Last update: 2026-10-06_Tue_19.36h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
khaled0111 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. khaled0111
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "khaled0111" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67214122 (unedited backup) (by Kavelj22) (scraped on Tue Oct 6 19:33:07 CEST 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
...
́Sorry, but do you mean that a casino will only catch all of your multiple accounts only if you make a deposit from each of them? If that's what you think, you may want to reconsider it, simply because that's not how anti-cheating systems work.
Believe it or not but most casino's anti-cheating systems are able to detect whether you have an alternative account even before you make your first deposit.
You are right about this point. Almost all casinos can detect the multi-accounting without the user makes mistake by depositing from the same source. There exist what is called device fingerprint by which the system can detect accounts using the same devices. Unless the multi accounting user is old school who doesn't change his IP each time he changes the account.
Well, we can't tell if the casino would act directly once catched or not. But I guess many of them wait until the person uses his accounts and makes deposits, then once willing to withdraw some winnings he will get hos account suspended for review. Then we know the result.
You're right about device fingerprinting being utilized to identify multi-accounting.
Some casinos also analyze browser fingerprints, device IDs, WebGL fingerprints, time zones, font types, and various other subtle indicators.
Therefore, merely changing the IP address has little effect if the individual is using the same device or browser, particularly Google Chrome.
I suspect that some casinos deliberately allow multi-accounting to continue for a while, waiting for the ideal moment when the individual makes a deposit, plays, and then attempts to withdraw significant winnings (this is just my speculation, though).
I share that speculation with you and I am sure many others do, considering the number of incidents of blocked users suspected to be doing multi-accounting after depositing and trying to withdraw, compared to the number of those blocked right after signing in. However, I can't frankly say that it is a commun method used by casinos to trap those users and punishing them for multi-accounting.
2. Post 67212306 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Tue Oct 6 09:04:49 CEST 2026) in هل انتهت تجربة السلفادور مع العملات المشف:
الفكرة نفسها نشأت في دولة أخرى لا تقل فقرا هي افريقيا الوسطى و لكن الفرق انها سريعا ما تخلت عن طموحات الكريبتو بعد ان أدركت عجزها عن مجاراته
أعتقد أن التمييز هنا مهم. ليس الأمر أن وسط أفريقيا تراجعت لمجرد أنها خرجت بأغلبية الأصوات. بل إنها أيضًا في اتحاد نقدي (CEMAC) مع بنك مركزي إقليمي هددها بفرض عقوبات لأن تشريعاتها الوطنية خالفت الاتحاد النقدي بأكمله. هذا يعني ضغطًا خارجيًا مباشرًا من الدول المجاورة، وليس مجرد اعتراف داخلي بالفشل.
السلفادور ليست في نفس الموقف لأنها مستقلة ماليًا بالفعل (مدولرة). الضغط الوحيد على السلفادور جاء من صندوق النقد الدولي، بدلاً من الدول المجاورة.
هل سبب فشل هذه التجربة هو الوضع الاقتصادي المتدهور، ام السبب هو عدم وجود رؤية و برنامج واضح
برايي الاثنين مو منفصلين، الوضع الاقتصادي المتدهور بالذات هو السبب اللي خلى القرار متسرع وغير مدروس، حكومة ماشية براس المال بشكل طبيعي ماكانت تحتاج تثبت نفسها بخطوة جريئة كذا. يعني الفقر نفسه ولد الحاجة للمقامرة السياسية.
هذا كان انتصار معنوي كبير جدا لمجتمع بيتكوين... وهذا بحد ذاته إنجاز كبير
بس لو كان انتصار معنوي حقيقي كان المفروض نشوف دول ثانية تتبعها بنفس الجدية، وحتى الوحيدة اللي جربت (افريقيا الوسطى) تراجعت خلال سنة وحدة. يعني الانجاز الرمزي موجود، بس عمليا ما قنع ولا دولة ثانية تكرر التجربة لحد الان، وهذا يضعف فكرة انه نموذج ناجح يستاهل التقليد.
3. Post 67211936 (unedited backup) (by #CapsLOck) (scraped on Tue Oct 6 04:36:31 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
As I said, it depends on how much you have in your bankroll. For example, if you have $10 in your bankroll and place $0.1 bets, it's exactly the same as someone who has $100 and places $1 bets.
However, I agree with you that placing small bets can give you the feeling that you may fulfil the wagering requirement safely (without much risks), but it doesn't. It’s just another gambling fallacy, nothing more.
I don't understand your maths because it is not adding up when consider wagered. $0.1 bets on a $10 balance is the same percentage of the account balance as $1 bet on a $100 balance but the wagered volume is completely different and that is what the casino look at and not the percentage of your balance you use in your individual bets. Unless, I did not get your point for which I would want you to make further clarifications.
I think what he meant by that is if you are placing a bet with only 0.10$ per bet, it would take you 100 bets to reach $10 wager.
A little different when you have a higher bankroll like for example, if you have a 100$ balance and place 1$ bet, you will need 100 bets to reach the same amount as your entire balance. Compared to someone with a small balance, placing a bet of 1$ can possibly result to losing the entire balance much faster.
The key point is to differentiate between the volume wagered and risk to the bankroll. Only wagers that count toward the wagering requirement count. Meaning that $0.10 bets and $1 bets count differently per round at the casino. However the size of the bankroll also plays a role since a $1 bet only takes up 10% of a $10 bankroll. But 1% of a $100 bankroll. Both sides are seeing the same side of the coin. Smaller bets can have a lower risk of losing the bankroll rapidly but won't be easier to accomplish with regards to overall volume.
4. Post 67211541 (unedited backup) (by Myleschetty) (scraped on Mon Oct 5 23:48:49 CEST 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
...
́Sorry, but do you mean that a casino will only catch all of your multiple accounts only if you make a deposit from each of them? If that's what you think, you may want to reconsider it, simply because that's not how anti-cheating systems work.
Believe it or not but most casino's anti-cheating systems are able to detect whether you have an alternative account even before you make your first deposit.
You are right about this point. Almost all casinos can detect the multi-accounting without the user makes mistake by depositing from the same source. There exist what is called device fingerprint by which the system can detect accounts using the same devices. Unless the multi accounting user is old school who doesn't change his IP each time he changes the account.
Well, we can't tell if the casino would act directly once catched or not. But I guess many of them wait until the person uses his accounts and makes deposits, then once willing to withdraw some winnings he will get hos account suspended for review. Then we know the result.
You're right about device fingerprinting being utilized to identify multi-accounting.
Some casinos also analyze browser fingerprints, device IDs, WebGL fingerprints, time zones, font types, and various other subtle indicators.
Therefore, merely changing the IP address has little effect if the individual is using the same device or browser, particularly Google Chrome.
I suspect that some casinos deliberately allow multi-accounting to continue for a while, waiting for the ideal moment when the individual makes a deposit, plays, and then attempts to withdraw significant winnings (this is just my speculation, though).
5. Post 67210711 (unedited backup) (by Kavelj22) (scraped on Mon Oct 5 18:42:26 CEST 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
...
́Sorry, but do you mean that a casino will only catch all of your multiple accounts only if you make a deposit from each of them? If that's what you think, you may want to reconsider it, simply because that's not how anti-cheating systems work.
Believe it or not but most casino's anti-cheating systems are able to detect whether you have an alternative account even before you make your first deposit.
You are right about this point. Almost all casinos can detect the multi-accounting without the user makes mistake by depositing from the same source. There exist what is called device fingerprint by which the system can detect accounts using the same devices. Unless the multi accounting user is old school who doesn't change his IP each time he changes the account.
Well, we can't tell if the casino would act directly once catched or not. But I guess many of them wait until the person uses his accounts and makes deposits, then once willing to withdraw some winnings he will get hos account suspended for review. Then we know the result.
6. Post 67207414 (unedited backup) (by masulum) (scraped on Sun Oct 4 18:32:55 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
As I said, it depends on how much you have in your bankroll. For example, if you have $10 in your bankroll and place $0.1 bets, it's exactly the same as someone who has $100 and places $1 bets.
However, I agree with you that placing small bets can give you the feeling that you may fulfil the wagering requirement safely (without much risks), but it doesn't. It’s just another gambling fallacy, nothing more.
yup, it will have the same value if we look at how much of the amount to bet. Small bets aren’t intended to increase the potential to win, since luck will always play a role in every spin. However, this is an effort to meet the wager requirement with a limited budget, and trying the smallest possible bet may help us achieve the goal. After all, it’s crucial to keep playing with your deposit to meet the minimum wager requirement for
this event if you only want to use a $10 deposit. If converted to an IDR balance, to reach the $20 minimum wager, starting from the smallest bet of 500 IDR (converted to dollars, that’s about 0.028 per spin), in the worst-case scenario, your money will run out after around 300–400 spins. And that’s assuming the reels only give symbols that don’t give any return or give only a small return. Is that possible? It’s very possible in slots.
just a preview
(human math, this can be wrong in real) between using small bets only with $10 deposits and how much spins you need
| Bet.............. | for $10 wager (worst case no winning).............. | for $20 Wager (with some winning) |
| $0.028 | 357 spins | 715 spins |
| $0.05 | 200 spins | 400 spins |
| $0.10 | 100 spins | 200 spins |
7. Post 67206015 (unedited backup) (by Tetu100) (scraped on Sun Oct 4 07:45:49 CEST 2026) in 2UP | No-KYC Crypto Casino & Bitcoin Sportsbook | Fast Withdrawals + 200% Bonus:
I was going to suggest giving the OP a couple of days to see if he will respond here and address this issue, but I realized that you posted about this more than a week ago and the OP hasn’t been online for more than three weeks. Given the above, I think it’s totally fine to create a scam accusation thread against them, not only to bring their attention to this matter but also to warn other users who play at their sportsbook who aren’t aware that the odds displayed before placing a bet aren’t the same as the ones that actually get accepted.
I don't think any genuine reason could probably make an op of a thread to completely go of line for almost a month? Especially on an official thread like this if not some dirty stuff or something that isn't clean or shady. However, i have warned severally that we should be more careful because people will aways appear to be real at the start but at the end become wild and likely prove how sensable they are. And to be save, let's just be always watchful while choosing a casino and avoid attractive offers. Hence it's not always what we think.
8. Post 67205496 (unedited backup) (by tabas) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 23:51:19 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
...
As I said, it depends on how much you have in your bankroll. For example, if you have $10 in your bankroll and place $0.1 bets, it's exactly the same as someone who has $100 and places $1 bets.
However, I agree with you that placing small bets can give you the feeling that you may fulfil the wagering requirement safely (without much risks), but it doesn't. It’s just another gambling fallacy, nothing more.
I understand the logic and everyone's pockets are not the same. I'd went with that route with placing very little bets just to fulfill the wagering requirements and it was successful. And if that's a gambler's fallacy, I think that you're right but as long as it works for me and to me it's not really that much while trying to fulfill that, I'll always choose to go for that option.
9. Post 67205215 (unedited backup) (by masulum) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 22:22:49 CEST 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
-snip-
Believe it or not but most casino's anti-cheating systems are able to detect whether you have an alternative account even before you make your first deposit.
you are right about this one, an anti cheating system will read some risk flag can be used by system, IP address is one of them, but because this can be a false positive information, system may flagging that account with another factor such as, device fingerprint, cookies/localstorage, device identifier and more. With these factors, the system can determine and detected that user have multiple accounts without waiting them to make a first deposit. However, will the platform immediately block those accounts? Some platforms do not immediately block multiple accounts until the users engage in activities that can harm the company, such as bonus abuse. So, in my opinion, the assumption that platforms wait for a deposit before blocking an account is not entirely incorrect, since each platform has its own criteria for deciding whether to block users with multiple accounts immediately or waiting until users being caught abusing bonuses or promotions.
10. Post 67204643 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 19:12:31 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
257. 507936:
DarkStar_ (
Trust: +62 / =1 / -0) (
2288 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
258. 516434:
Trevoid (
Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (
770 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
259. 520313:
Lutpin (
Trust: +29 / =2 / -1) (
880 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
260. 529564:
hymperion (
Trust: neutral) (
543 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
261. 532686:
nimogsm (
Trust: neutral) (
154 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
262. 535215:
ralle14 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1084 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
263. 538922:
TwitchySeal (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
1648 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
264. 543831:
zoose (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
265. 547435:
LTU_btc (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1066 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
266. 549786:
$crypto$ (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
763 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
267. 551460:
swogerino (
Trust: neutral) (
265 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
268. 553678:
Mr. Big (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
231 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
269. 554812:
DeathAngel (
Trust: neutral) (
837 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
270. 557000:
minibit (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
271. 558138:
elokk (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
19 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
272. 559842:
kryptqnick (
Trust: neutral) (
411 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
273. 569362:
x3t9fi (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
70 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
274. 579628:
bob123 (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
2261 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
275. 580327:
eddie13 (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
1776 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
276. 639573:
onemd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
18 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
277. 662129:
Chris! (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
133 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
278. 662400:
kzv (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
787 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
279. 679341:
TheFuzzStone (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
942 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
280. 698159:
Jet Cash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
2082 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
281. 728512:
Xavier59 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
46 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
282. 740502:
condoras (
Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (
676 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
283. 751988:
Taskford (
Trust: neutral) (
569 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
284. 755235:
arwin100 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
612 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
285. 765632:
bL4nkcode (
Trust: # +14 / =2 / -3) (
808 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
286. 779106:
Barcode_ (
Trust: neutral) (
91 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
287. 783422:
Slow death (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
697 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
288. 787736:
marlboroza (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
1781 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
289. 805741:
Javi_Anibarro (
Trust: neutral) (
32 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
290. 810879:
dimonstration (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (
231 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
291. 811213:
polymerbit (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
1016 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
292. 817682:
Gunthar (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
121 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
293. 820393:
Hardstyles (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
23 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
294. 821689:
Russlenat (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
590 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
295. 830898:
adamvp (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
208 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
296. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (
460 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
297. 831523:
taufik123 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
2284 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
298. 832366:
sportsbet.io (
Trust: +66 / =1 / -1) (
2775 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
299. 843320:
Komosa (
Trust: neutral) (
81 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
300. 844914:
Wind_FURY (
Trust: neutral) (
1726 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
301. 846936:
sabotag3x (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
2983 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
302. 849090:
tomahawk9 (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (
744 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
303. 857883:
Yatsan (
Trust: +3 / =5 / -0) (
764 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
304. 867786:
HCP (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
3882 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
305. 877396:
AdolfinWolf (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
927 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
306. 878630:
TheUltraElite (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
984 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
307. 879277:
Coding Enthusiast (
Trust: neutral) (
2612 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
308. 881377:
Hhampuz (
Trust: +137 / =4 / -0) (
6880 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
309. 881799:
altcoinb (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
32 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
310. 882509:
Blockchayne (
Trust: neutral) (
43 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
311. 884714:
CascadiaCC (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
312. 885934:
SamReomo (
Trust: neutral) (
731 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
313. 886369:
michellee (
Trust: neutral) (
410 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
314. 886521:
mk4 (
Trust: neutral) (
3647 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
315. 888099:
finaleshot2016 (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
933 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
316. 895302:
icon73 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
317. 897509:
xtraelv (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
1855 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
318. 898713:
paramind22 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
52 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
319. 898928:
Theb (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
406 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
320. 900408:
spirits (
Trust: neutral) (
963 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
321. 903175:
Csmiami (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
1277 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
322. 904524:
ChiBitCTy (
Trust: +34 / =1 / -0) (
3628 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
323. 910236:
Woodie (
Trust: neutral) (
888 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
324. 911663:
sompitonov (
Trust: neutral) (
1256 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
325. 917552:
slaman29 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
1306 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
326. 919511:
nelson4lov (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
640 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
327. 921974:
webtricks (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
1509 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
328. 926962:
xLays (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
598 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
329. 932936:
IdiotCoder (
Trust: neutral) (
16 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
330. 937020:
duesoldi (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
2390 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
331. 941129:
goodpunt (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
164 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
332. 942911:
entebah (
Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (
77 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
333. 943435:
xxjumperxx (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
276 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
334. 950662:
julerz12 (
Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (
1456 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
335. 961598:
ryzaadit (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
1429 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
336. 961708:
dittoup (
Trust: neutral) (
51 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
337. 962534:
Mahdirakib (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1129 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
338. 963640:
bct_ail (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
1997 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
339. 965120:
celeborne (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
340. 965440:
aoluain (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
1517 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
341. 969088:
leea-1334 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
800 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
342. 986781:
imhoneer (
Trust: neutral) (
1359 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
343. 988740:
frodocooper (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
160 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
344. 991374:
Porfirii (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
3680 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
345. 993021:
Hockeybum (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
31 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
346. 998490:
AlcoHoDL (
Trust: neutral) (
7555 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
347. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +90 / =1 / -0) (
4305 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
348. 1002739:
OneNattyLitecoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
235 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
349. 1012655:
khaled0111 (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
3369 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
350. 1013952:
Icygreen (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
886 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
351. 1015954:
aundroid (
Trust: neutral) (
1157 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
352. 1016105:
rozak (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
173 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
353. 1024276:
-doubleU- (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
1299 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
354. 1025255:
tyKiwanuka (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
1575 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
355. 1027694:
d_eddie (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
5679 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
356. 1031572:
rdluffy (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
1996 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
357. 1040400:
btcapollo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
358. 1047996:
bluefirecorp_ (
Trust: neutral) (
142 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
359. 1053119:
Halab (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
2725 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
360. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
15705 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
361. 1068464:
Xal0lex (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
3074 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
362. 1078623:
uelque (
Trust: neutral) (
26 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
363. 1091163:
Silent26 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
227 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
364. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
3853 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
365. 1103054:
pasrical (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
366. 1105709:
spider703 (
Trust: neutral) (
49 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
367. 1107222:
Don Pedro Dinero (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
2692 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
368. 1108269:
bitcoincidence (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1221 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
369. 1112467:
goldkingcoiner (
Trust: neutral) (
3129 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
370. 1112531:
Steamtyme (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
1950 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. Post 67204138 (unedited backup) (by DabsPoorVersion) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 16:09:13 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
As I said, it depends on how much you have in your bankroll. For example, if you have $10 in your bankroll and place $0.1 bets, it's exactly the same as someone who has $100 and places $1 bets.
However, I agree with you that placing small bets can give you the feeling that you may fulfil the wagering requirement safely (without much risks), but it doesn't. It’s just another gambling fallacy, nothing more.
I don't understand your maths because it is not adding up when consider wagered. $0.1 bets on a $10 balance is the same percentage of the account balance as $1 bet on a $100 balance but the wagered volume is completely different and that is what the casino look at and not the percentage of your balance you use in your individual bets. Unless, I did not get your point for which I would want you to make further clarifications.
I think what he meant by that is if you are placing a bet with only 0.10$ per bet, it would take you 100 bets to reach $10 wager.
A little different when you have a higher bankroll like for example, if you have a 100$ balance and place 1$ bet, you will need 100 bets to reach the same amount as your entire balance. Compared to someone with a small balance, placing a bet of 1$ can possibly result to losing the entire balance much faster.
12. Post 67203613 (unedited backup) (by Z_MBFM) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 12:35:19 CEST 2026) in 🎰 Spin.io ★ Fast Withdrawals ★ No KYC ★ VIP Transfer ★ 100% up to $100,000:
If a casino advertises itself as no-KYC and then asks a user for identity verification, for whatever reason, then this is deceptive advertising, to say the least.
On the other hand, any user with a minimum of common sense and logic is supposed to understand that a licensed casino can’t be completely no-KYC because that would be against their license requirements. The best you could expect from them is that they won’t ask for your documents unless they suspect that you are violating their terms or trying to cheat their system.
It's not a comfortable fact but people as users must be very knowledgeable and clever in choosing platforms from exchanges, marketplaces to casinos to use. They must self identify clearly that whether they are anti-KYC and try to avoid KYC as most as possible or they are KYC accepted and very ready to submit personal documents for KYC verification.
What online casinos promote are things users can not change, mostly can not change, so they must focus on their practice on KYC, protect KYC or let it go easily. The most important fact they must be aware is personal documents, privacy after losing will not be able to get it back, especially in this era of Internet, AI and massive storage by many parties.
It is not like KYC casinos or exchange are bad but privacy leakage has been the reason why so many players want to protect their identity so that they don't see their KYC data being everywhere as a result of cyber attack on the casino or exchange they have presented their information. We have seen the case of Bitsler that make the casino team to quickly close their operations because their KYC information on licensed platform was leaked to the public. This can be a dangerous exposure to the public that can affect a casino unexpectedly.
Yes, that is the main reason. If you do KYC on an exchange or casino platform, if it is secure with them, then it is not a problem. Because money is deposited there and gambling is done by trusting that platform. However, if that platform is ever hacked and kyc information leaks or if they sell those documents on the black market to get some financial support, that is a big reason for fear. Because if personal documents are used for any illegal or cyber crime, the person whose documents will be used can be in danger. That is why platforms without kyc always attract gamblers more and when a gambler comes to know that he has to do kyc on the platform where he is going to gamble, he is very scared about that issue and if necessary, he shifts to another platform.
13. Post 67203611 (unedited backup) (by Odohu) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 12:34:43 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
As I said, it depends on how much you have in your bankroll. For example, if you have $10 in your bankroll and place $0.1 bets, it's exactly the same as someone who has $100 and places $1 bets.
However, I agree with you that placing small bets can give you the feeling that you may fulfil the wagering requirement safely (without much risks), but it doesn't. It’s just another gambling fallacy, nothing more.
I don't understand your maths because it is not adding up when consider wagered. $0.1 bets on a $10 balance is the same percentage of the account balance as $1 bet on a $100 balance but the wagered volume is completely different and that is what the casino look at and not the percentage of your balance you use in your individual bets. Unless, I did not get your point for which I would want you to make further clarifications.
14. Post 67203499 (unedited backup) (by Bushdark) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 11:42:31 CEST 2026) in 🎰 Spin.io ★ Fast Withdrawals ★ No KYC ★ VIP Transfer ★ 100% up to $100,000:
If a casino advertises itself as no-KYC and then asks a user for identity verification, for whatever reason, then this is deceptive advertising, to say the least.
On the other hand, any user with a minimum of common sense and logic is supposed to understand that a licensed casino can’t be completely no-KYC because that would be against their license requirements. The best you could expect from them is that they won’t ask for your documents unless they suspect that you are violating their terms or trying to cheat their system.
It's not a comfortable fact but people as users must be very knowledgeable and clever in choosing platforms from exchanges, marketplaces to casinos to use. They must self identify clearly that whether they are anti-KYC and try to avoid KYC as most as possible or they are KYC accepted and very ready to submit personal documents for KYC verification.
What online casinos promote are things users can not change, mostly can not change, so they must focus on their practice on KYC, protect KYC or let it go easily. The most important fact they must be aware is personal documents, privacy after losing will not be able to get it back, especially in this era of Internet, AI and massive storage by many parties.
It is not like KYC casinos or exchange are bad but privacy leakage has been the reason why so many players want to protect their identity so that they don't see their KYC data being everywhere as a result of cyber attack on the casino or exchange they have presented their information. We have seen the case of Bitsler that make the casino team to quickly close their operations because their KYC information on licensed platform was leaked to the public. This can be a dangerous exposure to the public that can affect a casino unexpectedly.
15. Post 67203319 (unedited backup) (by BlackBoss_) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 10:12:07 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
As I said, it depends on how much you have in your bankroll. For example, if you have $10 in your bankroll and place $0.1 bets, it's exactly the same as someone who has $100 and places $1 bets.
However, I agree with you that placing small bets can give you the feeling that you may fulfil the wagering requirement safely (without much risks), but it doesn't. It’s just another gambling fallacy, nothing more.
Because the wagering requirement is the same and to win a wagering contest, wagering volume does not change no matter which strategies you use during the contest for accumulating your wagering volume and competing with other participants.
Top participants with highest wagering volumes have to wager more rounds with smaller capital to have an identified figure of wager volume, or have to wager less times but with bigger capital for each bet. Generally nothing change in long term because it's a game of probability, so wagering with bigger or smaller capital does not change probability.
16. Post 67203076 (unedited backup) (by Tetu100) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 07:26:31 CEST 2026) in 🎰 Spin.io ★ Fast Withdrawals ★ No KYC ★ VIP Transfer ★ 100% up to $100,000:
If a casino advertises itself as no-KYC and then asks a user for identity verification, for whatever reason, then this is deceptive advertising, to say the least.
On the other hand, any user with a minimum of common sense and logic is supposed to understand that a licensed casino can’t be completely no-KYC because that would be against their license requirements. The best you could expect from them is that they won’t ask for your documents unless they suspect that you are violating their terms or trying to cheat their system.
That is true. Even though they are demanding for a KYC let it be in this regard that you just mentioned above and not the other way round. I beleive players wouldn't find it too annoying if it's solely because of this reason. But where I find it very pissing is when I a casino will initially said they're non KYC at the beginning of everything and only start demanding for your details when you are about to withdraw your winnings. This is the height of it and casino really need to stop that attitude because it's no longer funny anymore.
However, what they've failed to understand is that, transparency and sincerity in everything is the best marketing strategy that can pull up a casino to any level they want. And this is what they don't understand.
17. Post 67203051 (unedited backup) (by Donneski) (scraped on Sat Oct 3 07:01:43 CEST 2026) in 🎰 Spin.io ★ Fast Withdrawals ★ No KYC ★ VIP Transfer ★ 100% up to $100,000:
If a casino advertises itself as no-KYC and then asks a user for identity verification, for whatever reason, then this is deceptive advertising, to say the least.
On the other hand, any user with a minimum of common sense and logic is supposed to understand that a licensed casino can’t be completely no-KYC because that would be against their license requirements. The best you could expect from them is that they won’t ask for your documents unless they suspect that you are violating their terms or trying to cheat their system.
I share the same view with you. Saying that a casino is NoKYC when they know very well that they demand verification especially when it's time to make withdrawals is a cheap misleading market strategy some of these casinos use.
NoKYC will better make sense when users will not be compulsorily asked for verification upfront but be forced to do so when their account becomes suspicious.
Everyone should try and be checking ToS before making deposits on casinos.
18. Post 67201081 (unedited backup) (by Itz-prisigold) (scraped on Fri Oct 2 16:25:01 CEST 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
That won’t be possible even if the bonus was available to any registred user simply because having more than one account is prohibited on Jack’s casino according to their
terms of service. So, if you get caught multi-accounting to abuse their bonus, or for whatever other reason, you will get banned and, most likely, your funds will be confiscated.
The weekly bonus is part of their VIP program and the bonus amount is determined based on the user’s VIP level.
The good thing about this is that the weekly bonus is based on a user's real activity in the account. And it's not something that anyone can sign up with several accounts just to abuse the bonus. It also implies that the bonus is more meaningful for players who use their platform regularly. That is actually a very effective strategy for me than giving rewards to everybody without considering if they are using the Casino or not. The important thing is that a regular player on jack.com have a little token to look forward to every week.
19. Post 67200859 (unedited backup) (by SuperBitMan) (scraped on Fri Oct 2 15:04:31 CEST 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
Of course everyone can’t be eligible for it, if it is available for everyone, people are going to abuse it, a single person may actually have 5 to 10 accounts there by abusing it
That won’t be possible even if the bonus was available to any registred user simply because having more than one account is prohibited on Jack’s casino according to their
terms of service. So, if you get caught multi-accounting to abuse their bonus, or for whatever other reason, you will get banned and, most likely, your funds will be confiscated.
Yeah I know of there terms and conditions concerning having multiple account however, even though they don’t allow it that those not mean some people won’t try to out smart them by having multiple account.
As a casino for you to stop people from having multiple account you need to make sure that before any account will get your bonus, like the one jack.com gives out weekly, you need to make sure those account have spent some time on your casino and they have spent some reasonable amount of money in your casino.
The conditions that is given for the jack.com weekly bonus is actually perfect even though it’s not actually that difficult.
Some people that usually come to scam accusation board to complain of a casino blocking their account is actually because of having multiple account.
20. Post 67200479 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Fri Oct 2 12:15:37 CEST 2026) in ملخص مشاركات القسم العربي الشهري:
سيكون من الجيد اخي لو تستطيع ان تجمع البيانات لنعرف تطور التفاعل في القسم ان كان قد ارتفع او قل
مرحباً، آسف على التأخير في الرد، لقد كنت مشغولاً بالعمل على ملخص Merit.
كما طلبت، جمعت الإحصائيات من موضوع الإحصائيات العامة لمنتدانا هنا:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231446.msg67193850#msg67193850كان من الصعب إنشاء رسم بياني يشمل جميع الأشهر السابقة، لذلك اكتفيت بنسخ عدد المشاركات فقط هذه المرة. عدد المشاركات لكل شهر هو كالتالي:
- أبريل: 162 مشاركة
- مايو: 143 مشاركة
- يونيو: 154 مشاركة
- يوليو: 139 مشاركة
- أغسطس: 141 مشاركة
- سبتمبر: 222 مشاركة
كما ترى، التفاعل لم ينخفض بل زاد، وكان سبتمبر هو الأعلى من حيث عدد المشاركات مقارنة بباقي الأشهر.
إن شاء الله سأشارك التحديث الشهري بداية من الشهر المقبل وعلى أساس منتظم. آمل أن يكون لديك المزيد من وقت الفراغ مع نهاية الصيف.
شكراً جزيلاً على كلماتك الطيبة، فنقاشاتك دائماً ما تضفي حيوية رائعة على القسم.
لوة بالقسم.
21. Post 67200421 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Fri Oct 2 11:48:25 CEST 2026) in [تقرير شهري] ملخص حركة نقاط الجدارة (Merits) في الق:
ملخص نقاط الجدارة (Merits) الشهري - القسم العربي
شهر سبتمبر 2026
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
كما وعدتكم سابقاً بمشاركة ملخص نقاط الجدارة (Merits) قريباً، إليكم التفاصيل.
دعونا نتحدث أولاً عن أكبر مرسلي الميرتس، وهم الأعضاء الذين قاموا بتوزيع أكبر عدد من نقاط الجدارة في مجتمعنا المحلي. وهذه القائمة تضم أعلى 3 مرسلين:
★ أعلى 3 مرسلين للميرتس في القسم العربي ★
- 🥇 mikeywith
- 🥈 hugeblack
- 🥉 OmegaStarScream
وهذا هو الرسم البياني لمرسلي الميرتس:
وهذا المخطط الدائري (Pie Chart) الذي يوضح نسبة كل مرسل:
ودعونا ننتقل الآن للحديث عن أكبر مستلمي الميرتس، وإليكم أعلى 3 أعضاء:
★ أعلى 3 مستلمين للميرتس في القسم العربي ★
- 🥇 khaled0111
- 🥈 OmegaStarScream
- 🥉 ObeyKnock
وهذا هو الرسم البياني لمستلمي الميرتس:
وهذا هو المخطط الدائري الخاص بهم:
إذا كان لديكم أي اقتراح أو شيء ترغبون في إضافته، لا تترددوا في مشاركتي إياه. سأحاول تطوير هذا الملخص أكثر في المرات القادمة. شكراً لكم جميعاً.
22. Post 67199923 (unedited backup) (by Odohu) (scraped on Fri Oct 2 07:08:37 CEST 2026) in 🎰 Spin.io ★ Fast Withdrawals ★ No KYC ★ VIP Transfer ★ 100% up to $100,000:
If a casino advertises itself as no-KYC and then asks a user for identity verification, for whatever reason, then this is deceptive advertising, to say the least.
On the other hand, any user with a minimum of common sense and logic is supposed to understand that a licensed casino can’t be completely no-KYC because that would be against their license requirements. The best you could expect from them is that they won’t ask for your documents unless they suspect that you are violating their terms or trying to cheat their system.
This is the right summery, and what I have been working with since the idea of no-KYC became a marketing strategy. I keep it in mind that KYC can be required at anytime even though the platform advertised as no-KYC, this helps me avoid surprises. Although, a legit casino that is not desperate for user data rarely ask for KYC unless there is serious need for that like the case of suspicious activities in the account.
23. Post 67199791 (unedited backup) (by OcTradism) (scraped on Fri Oct 2 04:47:43 CEST 2026) in 🎰 Spin.io ★ Fast Withdrawals ★ No KYC ★ VIP Transfer ★ 100% up to $100,000:
If a casino advertises itself as no-KYC and then asks a user for identity verification, for whatever reason, then this is deceptive advertising, to say the least.
On the other hand, any user with a minimum of common sense and logic is supposed to understand that a licensed casino can’t be completely no-KYC because that would be against their license requirements. The best you could expect from them is that they won’t ask for your documents unless they suspect that you are violating their terms or trying to cheat their system.
It's not a comfortable fact but people as users must be very knowledgeable and clever in choosing platforms from exchanges, marketplaces to casinos to use. They must self identify clearly that whether they are anti-KYC and try to avoid KYC as most as possible or they are KYC accepted and very ready to submit personal documents for KYC verification.
What online casinos promote are things users can not change, mostly can not change, so they must focus on their practice on KYC, protect KYC or let it go easily. The most important fact they must be aware is personal documents, privacy after losing will not be able to get it back, especially in this era of Internet, AI and massive storage by many parties.
24. Post 67197576 (unedited backup) (by GazetaBitcoin) (scraped on Thu Oct 1 14:12:43 CEST 2026) in [AOBT] THE ALLIANCE OF BITCOINTALK TRANSLATORS:
Yeah, this is why I thanked you previously. Now, since there is no other topic left to translate again, I have picked one from the list you shared with me. Soon, I will update you about the translation here once it is completed. Thanks!
Well, if it helps, here is a list containing only the topics which need Urdu translations (so you won't have to scroll through the entire big list anymore

)
6 translations available:5 translations available:- AI guidelines by theymos: this topic lacks translations in [TUR] [UKR] [BAN] [URD] [SER], so this should be in the attention of mindrust, DrBeer, DS, Adiljutt156 / snowpega and katanic97
4 translations available:2 translations available:
The Spanish translation for this topic is available
here.
Ooops that was a mistake on my side. I deleted the "[SPA]" after you made that translation, but left your name... In any case, good catch! One less available translation

25. Post 67196535 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Thu Oct 1 04:45:07 CEST 2026) in ملخص مشاركات القسم العربي الشهري:
ملخص المشاركات الشهري - القسم العربي
شهر سبتمبر 2026
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.
جاءتني هذه الفكرة من الأخ
Rikafip عندما وصلني إشعار إشارة (Mention) منه بالأمس، ففكرت أن بياناتنا في القسم المحلي (Local Board) يجب أن نراها أيضاً. في شهر سبتمبر، بلغ إجمالي المشاركات في قسمنا العربي 222 مشاركة.
هذه هي المرة الأولى التي أقوم فيها بجمع وإعداد هذه البيانات، لذا قد تكون هناك بعض الأخطاء. لا تترددوا في تنبيهي وسأحاول تصحيحها في المرات القادمة.
دعونا نتحدث الآن عن أعلى 3 أعضاء من حيث عدد المشاركات؛ أولهم اسمي هههه، والثاني الأخ
khaled0111، والثالث الأخ
Kavelj22.
دعونا الآن نستعرض الرسوم البيانية التي تغطي جميع أعضاء القسم العربي الذين شاركوا هذا الشهر. إذا كان لديكم أي ملاحظات أو أخطاء، لا تترددوا في ذكرها.
ملاحظة: استعنت بقليل من الذكاء الاصطناعي في إعداد هذه الرسوم البيانية.
كما أنشأت مخططاً دائرياً (Pie Chart) يوضح نسبة مساهمة كل عضو، وإليكم المخطط:
وهذا جدول يوضح أعلى 10 أعضاء نشاطاً هذا الشهر:
هذه محاولة بسيطة مني ومبادرة لتقديم ملخص شهري لمشاركات سبتمبر. تم جمع البيانات من موقع TryNinja الخاص بـ (bitlist.co).
قريباً جداً سأشارككم ملخص نقاط الجدارة (Merits) أيضاً، حيث لا أزال في مرحلة جمع وتحليل البيانات الخاص بها.
أتمنى أن تشاركوني آراءكم وملاحظاتكم، كيف وجدتم هذا الملخص؟
26. Post 67194045 (unedited backup) (by GazetaBitcoin) (scraped on Wed Sep 30 11:18:49 CEST 2026) in [AOBT] THE ALLIANCE OF BITCOINTALK TRANSLATORS:
Translated the article
Thank you DrBeer! I
announced irfan_pak10 about your translation.
And, since it's been 3 months from the last
update regarding the topics moved to "Finished" section, I am presenting below another update. I did this last time on June 30 and I kept that post updated with the translations which were made meanwhile.
6 translations available:5 translations available:- AI guidelines by theymos: this topic lacks translations in [TUR] [UKR] [BAN] [URD] [SER], so this should be in the attention of mindrust, DrBeer, DS, Adiljutt156 and katanic97
4 translations available:- Silent payments by witcher_sense: this topic lacks translations in [BAN] [HIN] [CRO] [SER], so this should be in the attention of DS, M47AK16 and katanic97
3 translations available:- Writing a welcome message by theymos: this topic lacks translations in [IDN] [BAN] [SER], so this should be in the attention of Husna QA / dansus021, DS and katanic97
2 translations available:- Satoshi's lesson by theymos: this topic lacks translations in [BAN] [SER], so this should be in the attention of DS and katanic97
1 translation available:
27. Post 67193850 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Wed Sep 30 09:37:19 CEST 2026) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
Its time for another brief overview of local boards activity, and this time for August 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr
Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.
Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview nevertheless.
Post activity per local board during August 2026During August, 15130 posts were written across local boards, which is an increase compared to July's numbers (13938 posts). Majority of this increase happened on three most active boards, but some others like Spanish had noticeable increase compared to previous month. French unfortunately continued declining and now its maybe at all time low numbers, or very close to it.
Active members per local board during August 2026Despite the increase in number of posts, active members went down from 1298 in July to 1265 in August. Nigerian boards keeps dominating this chart, with only Russian being somewhat close to them.
Local board members per amount of posts during August 2026When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leader is French board with 80% of such members, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage, only 11%.
At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Greek board with 56% while French had only 13% of such members.
Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Croatian board with 56% while French had only 7%.
Merit shared per local board during August 2026During August, 7218 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, and is a big increase compared to July's numbers (5818). Majority of this increase happened on Germna board, that went from 612 merit sent in July to 1510 in August, almost beating Nigerians at the top.
Merit/Post ratio per local board during August 2026In May, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, which is an increase compared to July's 0.42 merit per post. This time we have Polish board sticking out, but as seen from their last 12 month ratio, last month's was just an exception, and such a big difference can happen on less active boards.
Merit senders and receivers per local board during August 2026During last month, 562 members sent while 598 received merit which is an expected increase compared to July (509 senders, 588 receivers). Needless to say which local boards dominates this chart as well.
Percentage of merited posts across local boards during August 2026Romanian board remained at the top of this chart with very high 58% of merited posts, but Italian also has a high number, especially considering the fact that its one of the more active local boards on the forum.
Merit per transaction across local boards during August 2026And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habits of local boards, which (as you can see) differs from board to board.
The most active members per local board during August 2026This time top 3 most active local boards members all come from the same board, Russian. klarki is at the top with 162, while jokers10 and numberal both wrote 135 posts. GG.
[/table[
```
28. Post 67193092 (unedited backup) (by mikeywith) (scraped on Tue Sep 29 23:58:13 CEST 2026) in كيف تحدث اختراقات الكريبتو فعليا؟:
^^
كان منالاجدر كذلك اخي ميكي ان هناك فرق بيسدن سرقة بنك الكتروني و بين سرقة بنك فعلي.
اضافة لذلك، يجب الاشارة ان هناك فرق كبير بين سرقة حسابك الالكتروتي في بنك معين و بين سرقة محفظتك.
لهذا السبب دائما نؤكد على المبتدئين ان يفهمو هذه المقولة: " انت هو البنك الان".
لو سرق مليم واحد من بطاقة ائتمانك فيمكن لبنكك ان يسترجعها، لكن لو سرقت محفظتك او حتى ساتوشي واحد منها، فهي مسؤوليتك لكي تسترجعها.
نعم اخي خالد اثفق تماما, ماكنت احاول ان اشرحه هوا ان البنوك التقدليدية ليس اكثر اماننا من المنصات, فليس من المنطقي ان نقول ان بنك س في ساحل العاج لديه انظمة حماية ومهندسين افضل من باينانس, ولكن في المقابل لا احد يحاول اختراق ذلك البنك لانه ربما لايمتلك نظام تحويل الكتروني من الاساس, او يكون به سقف تحويل بقيمة 500$, ربما كان مثال البنك العاجي مبالغ فيه ولكني لازلت احاول ان اوضح الصورة بأن اختراق منصات الكريبتو مثل سرقة السيارات, فرصتك في الهروب وتصريفها قبل ان يتم القبض عليك كبيرة جدا, في المقابل سرقة حسابات المصارف هي تماما مثل سرق محلات تجارية او منازل, فأنت تعرض نفسك للخطر ولن يكون الخروج سهلا حتى لو كان الدخول كذلك.