khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 03, 2025, 11:32:16 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 03, 2025, 11:10:54 PM

انا لدي مثلك نفس الشعور بالرضا عن اي سعر للبيتكوين بما انني أستعمله في مدفوعاتي و يؤدي وظيفته بامتياز و اراقب السعر الذي هو دوما مؤشر على مزيد الانتشار و التبني بما انه في نسق عام نصاعدي، و لانني لست متداولا و لا مستثمرا. ما تلذي سيقلقني في السعر؟ لا شيء و لا اهتم حقا.

كل ما قلته منطقي لكنني متأكد ان رأيك سيتغير لو انك مثلا اشتريت البيتكوين بسعر معين ثم عندما اردت استعماله لشراء منتج معين وجدت ان سعره انخفظ للنصف او ربما اكثر. نفس الشيئ لو ان السعر ارتفع بشكل كبير.
عند شراء البيتكون بسعر محدد و استعماله لاتمام اي معاملة فلا يوجد اي اشكال ان كان لا يزال يحافظ على نفس السعر الذي اشتريته به، لكن لو تغير السعر فمتأكد ان رأيك سيكون مختلفا تماما. لهذا السبب، كلنا نتمنى ان يستقر سعر البيتكوين، طبعا بعد ان يصل الى السعر الذي يستحقه و يمكنه من ان يكون بديل جي للعملات التقليدية. حاليا، لا نزال بعيدين جدا عن ذلك السعر، للاسف.

أعتقد أن الاستقرار الحقيقي لسعر البيتكوين قد يتحقق بشكل تدريجي مع نضوج السوق وزيادة الاعتماد المؤسسي والجماعي، وربما بعد انتهاء تعدين جميع الوحدات. عندها ستنخفض حدة ضغوط البيع من المعدّنين، وتتحول العوامل المؤثرة في السعر إلى العرض والطلب الحقيقيين.حتى ذلك الحين، يبقى البيتكوين في مرحلة تحول كأصل ناشئ، وتقلباته جزء من رحلته نحو النضج. ما نراه اليوم هو صورة لبداية الثورة المالية، والأمل معقود على أن يصبح أكثر استقرارًا مع الوقت، ليخدم الجميع كمخزون للقيمة ووسيلة تبادل حقيقية.

Quote from: Pablo-wood on Today at 08:50:43 AM

$68.1412 sent
Please check DM

I am confirming that I have received it, and the new repayment amount should 16.26. If you repay after the repayment date then you will be charged 1% per day, which will be too small amount.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:56:10 AM

Hi shasan,

Loan Amount: 200 USDT
Purpose: personal
Collateral: None
Repayment date: 1 month
Loan Repay Amount: 220 USDT
Address (trc20): TL2djfNKSLhQTLRdSXcLYVVQuHjyr8SeK9

I have accepted your loan request and sent USDT to your wallet. Please check your account balance. Please repay on or before the due date to TFn3i5U1MTVRJ1KubzsFto4RcZgA7WEAFS

Quote from: Grace333 on Today at 09:57:04 AM

Loan Amount: 100 USDT
Loan Purpose: Personal
Loan Repay Amount: 110 USDT
Loan Repay Date: 1 Month
Type of Collateral: None
USDT TRC20 Address: TTgiNB6UrHvfBY9gCvMDHXcghRom7UyaXa

I have accepted your loan request and sent USDT to your wallet. Please check your account balance. Please repay on or before the due date to TFn3i5U1MTVRJ1KubzsFto4RcZgA7WEAFS

Quote from: Grace333 on Today at 09:57:04 AM

Loan Amount: 100 USDT
Loan Purpose: Personal
Loan Repay Amount: 110 USDT
Loan Repay Date: 1 Month
Type of Collateral: None
USDT TRC20 Address: TTgiNB6UrHvfBY9gCvMDHXcghRom7UyaXa

I have accepted your loan request and sent USDT to your wallet. Please check your account balance. Please repay on or before the due date to TFn3i5U1MTVRJ1KubzsFto4RcZgA7WEAFS

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 11:59:19 PM

I don’t know why this thread has turned into a discussion about gambling addictions?
It seems like some members always try to derail any discussion into topics they feel more comfortable with (sorry, but this is what I have noticed).
By the way, has anyone (from all those who posted in this thread) noticed that the OP created this topic about four months ago but he never replied to any of the comments or engaged in the discussion? Doesn’t this seem a bit weird to you?
I think it’s about time to add him to my ignore list.

Anything discussing gambling is likely to lead to gambling addiction, possibly starting with one person discussing gambling, which can lead to addiction. However, considering that gambling is inherently risky, it's obvious, yet many people ignore it. The OP's disappearance and non-participation in discussions is quite odd. His recent post also seems to indicate that he rarely checks his account, perhaps because he's simply lazy.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 30, 2025, 11:59:32 PM

Quote from: God Of Thunder on November 28, 2025, 12:59:13 PM

Well, it won't be possible if the casino triggers KYC during the withdrawal process. But believe me, KYC does not keep your account safe. What if someone gains access to your account, which is already KYC verified? The KYC won't help you this time. The hacker will be able to withdraw your funds because it is already verified. But let's forget about it because nobody keeps funds on a casino website these days.

KYC can help you regain access to your hacked account as it can prove you are the real owner (if it has already been verified) but it won’t stop the hacker from stealing your funds if he ever gets the chance to access your account (regardless of whether it’s verified or not).
If a hacker gains access to a verified account, then he can make a withdrawal request and he is unlikely to be asked to re-verify his (the real owner’s) identity before the request gets approved. If the account is not verified and he gets asked to verify his identity, then he can simply use a fake identity and hope it works.

Am still trying to understand something here, because we learn everyday, doesn't it mean that if a hacker hack someone gambling account and the person regained back access to his or her gambling account, that the hacker will still be able to steal the person funds if the hacker in one or the still get access to person gambling account he or she once hacked? And secondly if a hacker get access to some gambling account that is already verified with the person KYC, how will the hacker be able to make I withdrawal? Because the last I checked in some gambling platforms if the account details you intend use to withdraw your own funds from a gambling account doesn't match with the name you used during the registration process, that withdrawal won't be initiated. And most of the gambling platforms I have used do far do that.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 29, 2025, 07:59:41 PM

Quote from: Lida93 on November 29, 2025, 07:55:29 PM

I often question how those that are gambling for the fun of gambling are having trouble with addiction just as those who are gambling strictly for the profits. I can wave it off for people that are gambling for the funds but you shouldn't be addicted for fun. It doesn't make a difference with you and the man gambling to double his funds.

It starts with fun, then it turns into addiction, unfotunately.
There is a thin line between the two, and from my observation many gamblers don’t realize that they have crossed that line. This is why many gamblers don’t even realize they have become addicted even if you tell them.
I have tried many times to warn some of my friends because they were showing adiction signs, but most of them tend to ignore me and simply say “they ae fine and they are just having fun".

The thing is that the excesses of doing anything is bad and no fun catching should be done excessively otherwise we can as others who chase after their losses get into addiction and it would look like the individual is still on the course of fun, whereas they have crossed off. The poor addict wouldn't know they're having started suffering addiction, you can keep complaining and warning them but it won't change them until something very devastating happens to them resulting from their addiction habits.

Despite the clear warning it seems @SatCipher.com is continuing heavy usage of AI chatbots.

Quote from: SatCipher.com on November 30, 2025, 07:45:45 PM

Thank you for the additional input, memehunter.

We definitely value thoughtful input from community members like yourself, and we are paying close attention to every piece of feedback regarding the game mechanics and economy.

Regarding your suggestion on communication—we appreciate the advice and where you're coming from. For our part, we aim to provide the clearest, most comprehensive, and timely responses possible to keep the conversation moving and ensure transparency for all users. We prioritize substance and clarity in our answers above all else.

We hope you understand and focus on the ongoing discussion about Satoshi's Cipher itself!

Chatgpt: 100%
Stealth Writer: 100%

Quote from: SatCipher.com on November 30, 2025, 11:34:26 PM

Thank you for the warm welcome, khaled0111!

It's great to hear that the name and theme are memorable—we'll take that as a positive!

We can definitely understand why the design might feel familiar. The core concept of setting a secret pattern and having opponents guess it is inspired by classic logic puzzles (like Mastermind), which is an evergreen mechanic, and our initial design aimed for a clean, crypto-familiar look.

However, Satoshi's Cipher is a unique implementation. The key difference is the King-of-the-Hill PvP economy—where the Champion collects 90% of the challenge fees and earns a Treasury Yield. This ensures you are always playing against a human opponent, not the house algorithm.

We are fully committed to this project long-term and invite you to dive in and see how our specific ruleset and economy create a completely new dynamic!

👉 See the Live Action

Chatgpt: mixed result
Stealth Writer: 100%

There is a latest post also https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5566573.msg66118941#msg66118941 which also reflects usage of AI + human inputs. Let this be second warning (before 3rd clear cut AI post).

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 30, 2025, 09:59:51 PM

Welcome to bitcointalk, SatCipher!
I don’t know but the website theme seems familiar and the domain name always rings a bell!
I read TypoTonic’s reply and indeed they had another announcement thread but that’s not why they seem so familiar. I’m pretty sure I came across this website or mybe another one that is almost identical to it somewhere else!

If there's some site similar to them, what they can do is think how they can sustain the interest of their players. Because the truth is - with this type of casino, would be a challenge to maintain their operations. As usually, the interest is only at the beginning, and later on, would be very difficult to gain regular players and so they may encounter problems in terms of operational costs.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 30, 2025, 11:59:32 PM

Quote from: God Of Thunder on November 28, 2025, 12:59:13 PM

Well, it won't be possible if the casino triggers KYC during the withdrawal process. But believe me, KYC does not keep your account safe. What if someone gains access to your account, which is already KYC verified? The KYC won't help you this time. The hacker will be able to withdraw your funds because it is already verified. But let's forget about it because nobody keeps funds on a casino website these days.

KYC can help you regain access to your hacked account as it can prove you are the real owner (if it has already been verified) but it won’t stop the hacker from stealing your funds if he ever gets the chance to access your account (regardless of whether it’s verified or not).
If a hacker gains access to a verified account, then he can make a withdrawal request and he is unlikely to be asked to re-verify his (the real owner’s) identity before the request gets approved. If the account is not verified and he gets asked to verify his identity, then he can simply use a fake identity and hope it works.

The conclusion is that the player has no benefit from verifying their accounts. They still lose their funds if a hacker can access their account. However, a player can also regain their account by answering security questions to the support and sending an email from their registered email address. So, KYC is not the only thing that can help regain the account, right? KYC is a disadvantage for a player. We are risking our personal data.

I hope the third-party companies handle the data carefully and don't sell it on the black market. As I mentioned earlier, I believe most people prefer no-KYC casinos. It may help the casinos, but it is useless for a player.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 11:35:55 PM

Sorry to say this, but I really don’t like the fact that even after three days since panjul explained that they need to change their DM settings so they can receive PMs from newbies, newbies are still complaining that they can’t send them personal messages. They either need to follow panjul’s recommendation, appoint an experienced member to take care of their promotions or just end this promotion altogether.

Quote from: samo88 on November 28, 2025, 10:52:15 PM

The only reason why they have high reviews in Trustpilot is because they are doing another illegal thing by giving free crypto in exchange of reviews to their users.

Can you prove this?

Yes, when they stole my money I research online how it was possible that they had so many 5 stars and found their social media having a promo to get free Tron for a trustpilot review https://jackpotter.com/promotions/get-1-ton-for-free-for-your-trustpilot-review

When I reported this to Trustpilot they removed it, but if you search for that link in Bing it still appears

https://ibb.co/4wdzz3gD

And then also if you go to the own Trustpilot reviews you have some people even mentioning it in the reviews:
https://ibb.co/NgT4TJGy

And then among their promos, they had another one to get free XRP if you talked in one of the crypto forums, so they are just professional scammers, nothing more in my opinion.
https://ibb.co/8gfwwtTD

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 30, 2025, 10:58:13 PM

Quote from: lionheart78 on November 30, 2025, 10:37:09 PM

I checked Big Bass Bonanza has 96.71 RTP almost the same as most slot games but to my experience and witnessing streamers' results on this game, Big Bass Bonanza seems to be stingy in giving the player a win, making us think that it is a high volatility slot, but according to its feature, it is in the medium volatility category.

I don’t know why, but I used to think that "Big Bass Bonanza" was one of the games with medium or low volatility. After reading your post, I did a quick search and it turns out that it’s indeed a high-volatility game!
I tried to check the game info on 2UP but I couldn’t because they have more than 580 games from Pragmatic Play and they don’t have a search feature. So you have to go through the whole list till you find the game you are looking for.
The search feature is something that 2UP should consider adding.

Hi there,

We do have a search function.

For PC its on the left side menu bar
For mobile its on the top navigation bar

Thanks

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 30, 2025, 11:59:32 PM

KYC can help you regain access to your hacked account as it can prove you are the real owner (if it has already been verified) but it won’t stop the hacker from stealing your funds if he ever gets the chance to access your account (regardless of whether it’s verified or not).
If a hacker gains access to a verified account, then he can make a withdrawal request and he is unlikely to be asked to re-verify his (the real owner’s) identity before the request gets approved. If the account is not verified and he gets asked to verify his identity, then he can simply use a fake identity and hope it works.

Passing KYC allows to avoid some fraud because casino knows all its clients but only some.
It does not allow to prevent all fraud and scam.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 30, 2025, 10:58:13 PM

Quote from: lionheart78 on November 30, 2025, 10:37:09 PM

I checked Big Bass Bonanza has 96.71 RTP almost the same as most slot games but to my experience and witnessing streamers' results on this game, Big Bass Bonanza seems to be stingy in giving the player a win, making us think that it is a high volatility slot, but according to its feature, it is in the medium volatility category.

I don’t know why, but I used to think that "Big Bass Bonanza" was one of the games with medium or low volatility. After reading your post, I did a quick search and it turns out that it’s indeed a high-volatility game!
I tried to check the game info on 2UP but I couldn’t because they have more than 580 games from Pragmatic Play and they don’t have a search feature. So you have to go through the whole list till you find the game you are looking for.
The search feature is something that 2UP should consider adding.

I don't know much about big bass although I have been actively playing the game on a casino where it's used as the main game for their bonus requirements and I have also won a couple of cash on it likewise the same I have lost too although not actually a lot of losses because I know the game is really hard to win. The casino offers 100 free spins on big bass for registration and welcome bonus with no wager requirement on the winning from the 100 free spins just that q deposit of 15$ is required to activate the free spin, nice isn't it? I hope casino here could replicate something like this.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:59:51 PM

Welcome to bitcointalk, SatCipher!
I don’t know but the website theme seems familiar and the domain name always rings a bell!
I read TypoTonic’s reply and indeed they had another announcement thread but that’s not why they seem so familiar. I’m pretty sure I came across this website or mybe another one that is almost identical to it somewhere else!

Thank you for the warm welcome, khaled0111!

It's great to hear that the name and theme are memorable—we'll take that as a positive!

We can definitely understand why the design might feel familiar. The core concept of setting a secret pattern and having opponents guess it is inspired by classic logic puzzles (like Mastermind), which is an evergreen mechanic, and our initial design aimed for a clean, crypto-familiar look.

However, Satoshi's Cipher is a unique implementation. The key difference is the King-of-the-Hill PvP economy—where the Champion collects 90% of the challenge fees and earns a Treasury Yield. This ensures you are always playing against a human opponent, not the house algorithm.

We are fully committed to this project long-term and invite you to dive in and see how our specific ruleset and economy create a completely new dynamic!

👉 See the Live Action

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 29, 2025, 09:52:54 PM

Quote from: NurseHub on November 29, 2025, 09:27:30 PM

there are scenarios where it's very important to split or splitting can be the best options because basically things happen and unforeseen circumstances like robbery where they are aware of your crypto involvement but because it's splited there is no amount of pressure that can get them there at the point of robbery they can have 6 and 6 will be left so it's not possible to access

That’s a good point, and it shows why splitting the seed could be a good strategy in some cases.
However, if someone steals one of the pieces of paper (or whatever storage medium you used) on which you stored part of your seed, you also won’t be able to access your wallet if you didn’t make multiple backups and store them in different places. So, this is something you need to consider.
Personally, I believe using a passphrase is more convenient and more secure than seed splitting.

Of course stolen piece won't work if the two parts are not united however for the owner there must be a complete backup which is very much recommended using those plates or boards to store them and if you miss one you can actually put it back with some help, at the end of the day I am very much convinced that splitting would help alot on scenarios like I mentioned yet personally preferences should be made unlike mine.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 09:58:30 PM

سؤلك غريب بعض الشيئ صديقي. لماذا تهتم كثيرا بجنسيات الاعضاء هنا و لماذا تعتقد انه يجب ان يخبروك من اي دولة هم؟
برأيي، من الافضل ان يتم التركيز اكثر على الافكار التي يتم طرحها و مناقشتها هنا عوض التركيز على الاشخاص الذين يطرحونها و محاولة معرفة معلومات شخصية حولهم.
اعرف الكثير من الاشخاص في هذا القسم منذ ان تم انشاؤه و لم يتم طرح مثل هذه الاسئلة من قبل.
اتفهم فضولك، لكن لا اعتقد ان مثل هذه الاسئلة مرحب بها كثيرا في مثل هذا المنتدى. لكن ربما يجيبك بعض الاعضاء!

و انا اتفهم فضوله ايضا و قد اجبته اجابة عامة حول اهمية مبدأ الخصوصية خصوصا في منتدى يهتم بالبيتكوين الداعم المهم لفكرة الخصوصية. كنت لن استغرب السؤال لو كان من عضو نشط هنا في القسم العربي و ربما قد يرغب بايجاد شراكات محتملة او مشاركة انشطة محلية اذا هناك من هم من بلده، لكن العضو بحساب جديد و يبدو انه ليس من رواد المنتديات عموما و غالبا يعتقد ان هذا فضاء يشبه فيسبوك او تيكتوك.

انا اعرف جنسيات بعض رواد القسم العربي الذين منهم لا يتحرج بالافصاح عن جنسيته، و منهم من كان لنا حوار في الخاص و تقربنا اكثر احدنا للاخر. ليس السؤال محرما لكن يجب ان نتفهم اهمية الحفاظ على مبدأ الخصوصية. على فكرة نفس الشيء ينطبق على الاعضاء في بقية الاقسام المحلية التي تكون اللغة تتحدث بها اكثر من بلد كالاسبانية و الفرنسية و البرتغالية، اين لا يمكن التمييز بين الجنسيات المختلفة، عكس الاقسام المحلية التي تكون اللغة فريدة لبلد معين مثل الالمانية او التركية.

Quote from: joeperry on Today at 04:34:51 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 29, 2025, 10:57:49 PM

The widespread use of the internet and the affordability of smartphones have definitely helped make gambling more accessible to almost everyone around the world. But this has been the case for many years now, so what really contributed to making gambling accessible to everyone, in my opinion, is online casinos starting to accept cryptocurrencies as a payment method. This development has, without a doubt, completely changed the gambling industry.

It's actually a game changer, imagine you would be able to play anywhere you are either rural and urban this also increase the government profit. However there's always a downside, people that are addicted to gambling are more prone now due to number of gambling sites that they can access and play by just signing up, and a lot of minors would be able to access the site too, so it's really a matter of responsibility and every one should learn how to be a responsible gambler. Anyway, I've seen that the Earnbet may ask KYC upon withdrawal, does anyone here managed to withdraw without submitting KYC? I've played in Earnbet before when it's still called EOSbet and it's pure cryptocurrency that's why I wasn't asked a KYC.

Since they rebranded their name, I think they’ve actually improved based on what I’m seeing, though I’ve already signed up on their website but haven’t tried playing yet for now.
But I do have plans to play there in the future.

However, I wasn’t able to try playing back when they were still EOSBet. Did they have a problem before? It seems like they didn’t have any issues before, right? Although I actually don’t know anything about their past. But as of the moment, their casino is running smoothly.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 29, 2025, 10:57:49 PM

The widespread use of the internet and the affordability of smartphones have definitely helped make gambling more accessible to almost everyone around the world. But this has been the case for many years now, so what really contributed to making gambling accessible to everyone, in my opinion, is online casinos starting to accept cryptocurrencies as a payment method. This development has, without a doubt, completely changed the gambling industry.

It's actually a game changer, imagine you would be able to play anywhere you are either rural and urban this also increase the government profit. However there's always a downside, people that are addicted to gambling are more prone now due to number of gambling sites that they can access and play by just signing up, and a lot of minors would be able to access the site too, so it's really a matter of responsibility and every one should learn how to be a responsible gambler. Anyway, I've seen that the Earnbet may ask KYC upon withdrawal, does anyone here managed to withdraw without submitting KYC? I've played in Earnbet before when it's still called EOSbet and it's pure cryptocurrency that's why I wasn't asked a KYC.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 29, 2025, 11:58:41 PM

Quote from: lionheart78 on November 29, 2025, 09:54:23 PM

I think the free spins use the same setup as the regular spins have, RTP and house edge are still the same as the normal bets. I have claimed lots of free spins from different casinos before, and the experience is the same as if I were wagering my own money. I win sometimes, I don't get anything sometimes, but if lucky, I even get into the bonus round using those free spins.

If the game is fair and not rigged, which I believe is the case for almost all slot games from trusted and well-known game providers, then the result will be the same whether you play free spins or regular spins. The only difference is the bet value since in free spins it will be set by the casino and you can’t change it.
I’m really curious to know what the bet value was in this case as someone would need to be very unlucky to win only $1 or $2 from 100 free spins if the bet value was $0.2 or more!

The base bet for free spins is usually fixed at the lowest level, often around $0.10-$0.20 per spin, depending on what the casino sets. I also believe that free spins work exactly the same as playing normally, whether you're using your own money or free spins. The chances of winning, hitting a bonus, or getting nothing are still the same. If the results are small, it's probably just bad luck or the slot has a lower RTP.

Quote from: Ochan_yazo_tochant on Today at 09:31:09 PM

Quote from: yhiaali3 on Today at 02:26:36 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 08:59:12 PM

هنا يجب ان اعيد نفس السؤال الذي طرحته سابقا، و ه طو ما هي البدائل المتوفرة و لماذا لم تتمكن من المنافسة و ان كان المانع ماديا فلماذا لم يتم دعمها من قبل اي طرف؟

لذلك المشكلة الكبرى في الانتقال برأيي هي مشكلة الدمج والتكامل ، يعني أن تنتقل من كل هذه الخدمات التي يقدمها كلاود فلاير إلى خدمات أخرى بسلاسة ودون مشاكل هو تحدي كبير ويحتاج الكثير من الوقت وبحاجة أيضا للاختبار قبل التشغيل للتأكد من عدم وجود مشاكل والبحث عن ثغرات أمنية محتملة والكثير من الأمور الأخرى المعقدة.

لكل هذه الأسباب فإن الشركات خاصة الكبيرة تفضل البقاء على هذا الاختيار وتجنب كل المشاكل المحتملة للانتقال

الاعتماد على Cloudflare أصبح أشبه بضرورة تقنية استراتيجية والبديل الوحيد هو بناء نظام موازٍ بالتدريج خلال سنوات، وهو ما قد لا تستطيع معظم الشركات تحمله!
لهذا أعتقد أن الفكرة التي تسأل عليها الأخ خالد أن المانع ليس ماديا فقط بل أيضاً كم من الوقت الذي تحتاجه الشركات الناشئة لبناء النظام البيئي للخدمة.،لهذا فأغلب الشركات لم تجد حلول بديلة لذلك نراها متشبثة بخدمات cloudflare في الوقت الحالي مادامت الحلول غائبة

حسب ما فهمت فان المشكلة ليست في البديل ايضا اذا كان هناك اتفاق على مبدأ المركزية. حرفاء CloudFlare لهم من الخيارات العديد فضلا عن كونهم قادرون على العمل ايضا على تطوير تلك البدائل لانفسهم. المشكلة على ما يبدو هي في الانتقال الى اي نظام بديل. عملية الانتقال الى اي نظام بديل سواء كانت الموقع تطويره ذاتيا او اشتراه. شركة CloudFlare ظهرت كحل لمشكلة و استحوذت على المجال لدرجة ان 20% من مواقع النترنت نجحت ان تكسب ثقتها و هي نسبة ضخمة جدا.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:52:54 PM

~
However, if someone steals one of the pieces of paper (or whatever storage medium you used) on which you stored part of your seed, you also won’t be able to access your wallet if you didn’t make multiple backups and store them in different places. So, this is something you need to consider.
Personally, I believe using a passphrase is more convenient and more secure than seed splitting.

When you split a seed with something like Shamir's Secret Sharing, you need a certain number of pieces to put it back together - say, 3 out of 5. So, one stolen piece wont do anything.

A passphrase is a great way to add security. But SSS gives you a method for spreading the risk, which might be even better than trusting just one phrase you have to remember or write down separately.

Quote from: yhiaali3 on Today at 02:26:36 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 08:59:12 PM

هنا يجب ان اعيد نفس السؤال الذي طرحته سابقا، و ه طو ما هي البدائل المتوفرة و لماذا لم تتمكن من المنافسة و ان كان المانع ماديا فلماذا لم يتم دعمها من قبل اي طرف؟

لذلك المشكلة الكبرى في الانتقال برأيي هي مشكلة الدمج والتكامل ، يعني أن تنتقل من كل هذه الخدمات التي يقدمها كلاود فلاير إلى خدمات أخرى بسلاسة ودون مشاكل هو تحدي كبير ويحتاج الكثير من الوقت وبحاجة أيضا للاختبار قبل التشغيل للتأكد من عدم وجود مشاكل والبحث عن ثغرات أمنية محتملة والكثير من الأمور الأخرى المعقدة.

لكل هذه الأسباب فإن الشركات خاصة الكبيرة تفضل البقاء على هذا الاختيار وتجنب كل المشاكل المحتملة للانتقال

الاعتماد على Cloudflare أصبح أشبه بضرورة تقنية استراتيجية والبديل الوحيد هو بناء نظام موازٍ بالتدريج خلال سنوات، وهو ما قد لا تستطيع معظم الشركات تحمله!
لهذا أعتقد أن الفكرة التي تسأل عليها الأخ خالد أن المانع ليس ماديا فقط بل أيضاً كم من الوقت الذي تحتاجه الشركات الناشئة لبناء النظام البيئي للخدمة.،لهذا فأغلب الشركات لم تجد حلول بديلة لذلك نراها متشبثة بخدمات cloudflare في الوقت الحالي مادامت الحلول غائبة

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 11:35:55 PM

Sorry to say this, but I really don’t like the fact that even after three days since panjul explained that they need to change their DM settings so they can receive PMs from newbies, newbies are still complaining that they can’t send them personal messages. They either need to follow panjul’s recommendation, appoint an experienced member to take care of their promotions or just end this promotion altogether.

Thanks for pointing that out — we appreciate the feedback. 🙏 We’re already adjusting the DM settings so newbies can contact us without issues

273. 389271: Limx Dev (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
274. 389331: RHavar (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
275. 392915: darkv0rt3x (Trust: neutral) (682 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
276. 393771: oliver12 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
277. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (525 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 396526: ezeminer (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 396591: panjul07 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (388 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 397157: Magnavox (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 397633: Abiky (Trust: +25 / =1 / -0) (464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 397737: hilariousetc (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2582 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 401014: Ultegra134 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (940 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (72 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (4471 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 405709: ds06 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 407112: deathdealer1252 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 407892: micromen (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 409704: Acura3600 (Trust: neutral) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 430390: psycodad (Trust: neutral) (2093 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 454323: Raimonn (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1524 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3899 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 507015: BtcCrazy1 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +66 / =1 / -0) (2284 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +34 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 531201: d4rkwizard (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (5892 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1639 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 543626: jackg (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 545598: Isildur (official) (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (87 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (994 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (257 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust: neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 553678: Mr. Big (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (637 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (36 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (4994 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 689964: RariBest (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 705593: gt_addict (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 740502: condoras (Trust: +14 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 751988: Taskford (Trust: neutral) (481 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (518 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (649 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust: neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (781 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 815246: Murat (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2760 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (908 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust: neutral) (1616 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (2384 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 878630: TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (922 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
353. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2599 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
354. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +140 / =4 / -0) (6312 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
355. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
356. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
357. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (552 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
358. 886369: michellee (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (404 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
359. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3645 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
360. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
361. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1845 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
362. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
363. 898928: Theb (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
364. 900408: spirits (Trust: neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
365. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
366. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (3548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 910236: Woodie (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1148 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (617 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (370 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1923 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1031 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: neutral) (53 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 942911: entebah (Trust: neutral) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1020 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1189 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
383. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
384. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1044 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
385. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1995 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
386. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1324 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
387. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (706 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
388. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
389. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
390. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust: neutral) (6098 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
391. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
392. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3202 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
393. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
394. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
395. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
396. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 28, 2025, 08:59:12 PM

هنا يجب ان اعيد نفس السؤال الذي طرحته سابقا، و ه طو ما هي البدائل المتوفرة و لماذا لم تتمكن من المنافسة و ان كان المانع ماديا فلماذا لم يتم دعمها من قبل اي طرف؟

من أبرز بدائل Cloudflare هناك خدمات مثل Sucuri، Akamai، Fastly، Imperva، StackPath، BunnyCDN، وAWS CloudFront. رغم وجود كل هذه البدائل لكن الشركات الكبرى تستمر بالاعتماد على Cloudflare بسبب انتشاره العالمي وسهولة الدمج والأسعار التنافسية وخدمات الأمان المتكاملة التي يصعب منافستها.

حسبما ما فهمت فإن الانتقال إلى خدمة أخرى مكلف ومعقد نوعا ويتطلب بعض الوقت وسيكون تحدي كبير أن تنتقل من خدمة إلى خدمة جديدة دون أن يشعر المستخدمين بذلك ودون أن تضطر لتوقيف الخدمات، كما أنه ما الضمان أن الخدمة الجديدة لن تتعرض للتوقف أيضا؟

تعمقت بالبحث أكثر ووجدت أن كلاود فلاير لايقوم بمهمة واحدة بل بعدة مهام حيث أنه يقوم بتسريع المواقع عبر شبكة CDN، حماية من هجمات DDoS، توفير جدار ناري للتطبيقات (WAF)، إدارة DNS بسرعة عالية، وتحسين أمان الاتصالات عبر بروتوكولات مثل HTTPS بالإضافة إلى تحسين الأداء ومراقبة وتحليلات (تقديم تقارير عن حركة المرور، الهجمات، وأداء الموقع...)

لذلك المشكلة الكبرى في الانتقال برأيي هي مشكلة الدمج والتكامل ، يعني أن تنتقل من كل هذه الخدمات التي يقدمها كلاود فلاير إلى خدمات أخرى بسلاسة ودون مشاكل هو تحدي كبير ويحتاج الكثير من الوقت وبحاجة أيضا للاختبار قبل التشغيل للتأكد من عدم وجود مشاكل والبحث عن ثغرات أمنية محتملة والكثير من الأمور الأخرى المعقدة.

لكل هذه الأسباب فإن الشركات خاصة الكبيرة تفضل البقاء على هذا الاختيار وتجنب كل المشاكل المحتملة للانتقال

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 27, 2025, 10:49:33 PM

^^
الحيتان هم من يتحكمون في السوق. البقية هم فقط يحاولون المواكبة و ذاك ما ينتج عنه ما يعرف بظاهرة كرة الثلج. يعني، "تجار التجزئة" كما قال الاخ في الاعلى بالتاكيد يؤثرون في السوق، لكن الطرف الرئيسي الذي يحدد الاتجاه ان كان صعودي او نزولي هم الحيتان.
تجار التجزئة عادة ما يقومون بتتبع ما يحدث في السوق، اي اذا كان هناك توجه للبيع سيقومون بالبيع و ان كان هناك توجه للشراء سيقومون بالشراء. هذا ما ينتج عنه ظاهرة كرة الثلج.
على كل حال، يبدو ان سعر البيتكوين بدأ بالتعافي، لكن لا يمكن معرفة ان كان السعر سيعود لمستويات فوق المائة الف التي استقر فيها البيتكوين طيلة الاشهر السابقة. سيكون من المشوق رؤية ما سيحدث في الفترة القادمة!

أعتقد أنك فهمت الطريقة الصحيحة لكيفية عمل طلبات البيع و الشراء و الحيتان الكبار هم المأثرين في تذبذب الأسعار كما حدث مع مايكل بمجرد تصريحه للبيع إنزلق سعر البتكوين. أما التعافي الذي شهده البتكوين في الأيام القليلة الماضية لا أعتقد أنه بذلك الزخم المرغوب فيه. ربما مسار السعر سيرتد في أي لحظة تم فيها إصدار أخبار سلبية خصوصا أننا في أيام أعياد الميلاد.

@yahiiali أخي أعتقد أنك الآن تعرف أحد الأسباب الهبوط أليس كذلك؟

Quote from: yhiaali3 on Today at 02:18:07 AM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on November 25, 2025, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 19, 2025, 10:58:49 PM

اتمنى ان لا يتكرر حدوث مثل هذا الخلل مرة اخرى، رغم انه لا يوجد اي ضمان لذلك، لكن يجب التفكير بجدية بايجاد حل بديل اقل مركزية او على الاقل خطة بديلة للتقليل من الخسائر باكبر قدر ممكن.

المشكلة يا صديقي ان هناك فعلا بدائل متوفرة و ربما البعض منها لا يقل كفاءة عن cloudflareلا و صار اكيدا ان cloudflare ليست على تلك الدرجة من الكفاءة. المشكلة الاخرى او بالاحرى المفاجأة الاخرى ان ما حصل مؤخرا سيتكرر و ربما باضرار اكثر مادامت كبرى المواقع تستعمل نفس الخدمة اي ان الضرر لو حدث فسيكون كارثيا. هل هناك من يمدنا ببيانات او حتى مجرد توقعات عن حجم الخسائر التي تكبدتها شركات و ربما افراد اؤضا بسبب حالة الشلل التي اصابت سوق الانترنت لعدة ساعات؟ من المفترض ان تقديرات موضوعية يمكنها تقدير ذلك و الاكيد ان العملية لم تمضي بسلام كما قد يعتقد البعض.

قمت ببعض البحث حول الخسائر التي يمكن أن يكون تسبب بها توقف cloudflare لبضعة ساعات لكنني لم أجد إجابات حول الموضوع حتى أنني سألت الذكاء الاصطناعي فأخبرني أنه لا توجد إجابات واضحة لأن الشركات تخفي مثل هذه البيانات عن خسائرها لتجنب الذعر أو التأثير على أسهمها وهذا جواب منطقي بالفعل. لذلك من الصعب جدا إيجاد مثل هذه البيانات حول حجم الخسائر.

لكن أكثر المواقع تضررا كانت هي مواقع عالمية مثل منصات التواصل (X، Truth Social) وشركات الذكاء الاصطناعي والخدمات السحابية مثل OpenAI (ChatGPT وSora)، وشركات التجارة الإلكترونية مثل Shopify، لكن المدهش أن حجم الاعتماد العالمي كبير جدا نحو 20% من حركة الإنترنت العالمية تمر عبر Cloudflare. هذا رقم مهول بالفعل Huh

شكرا على اجتهادك صديقي يحي. لقد حاولت فعلا البحث عن معطيات منشورة حتى في شكل توقعات محتملة و لم اجد شيئا يذكر. لكن هذا حسب رأيي يؤكد حصول خسائر لأنه من المستحيل ان ساعات من التعطيل قد مرت بسلام دون خسائر نذكر. كما ذكر الذكاء الاصطناعي، الشركات المتضررة تخفي البيانات كي لا تزيد من حالة الذعر و تتأثر صورتها في السوق خصوصا امام منافسيها الذين لم يتضرروا من الانقطاع. حتى منصات التواصل الاجتماعي ستفقد جزءا من قاعدة مستخدميها اذا كشفت عن اضرار اصابتهت.

هذا يدفعني مبتشرة للتفكير في اكثر ضرر محتمل انه وقع و هو لشركة CloudFlare نفسها التي لابد انها فقدت جزءا مهما من مصداقيتها كخدمة احترافية و بالتالي فان قاعدة مستخدميها لابد ان تكون في تراجع مستمر منذ يوم الحادث. هناك مراجعات لابد ان جميع حرفاء CloudFlare يقومون بها لتغيير الخدمة او تطوير برمجياتها الخاصة خصوصا اننا نتكلم عن شركات عملاقة رائدة في مجالها. حصة 20% ضخمة جدا و هذا ما يؤكد خطورة المركزية المطلقة حين تكون جهة مركزية واحدة هي المتحكمة.

ايضا بحثت عن ما يمكن ان يكون تسبب في الخلل و يبدو ان الشركة تتحفظ هلى هذه المعطيات. لكن طبعا الاسئلة ستبقى عالقة الى ان يأتي ما يفندها.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on November 25, 2025, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 19, 2025, 10:58:49 PM

اتمنى ان لا يتكرر حدوث مثل هذا الخلل مرة اخرى، رغم انه لا يوجد اي ضمان لذلك، لكن يجب التفكير بجدية بايجاد حل بديل اقل مركزية او على الاقل خطة بديلة للتقليل من الخسائر باكبر قدر ممكن.

المشكلة يا صديقي ان هناك فعلا بدائل متوفرة و ربما البعض منها لا يقل كفاءة عن cloudflareلا و صار اكيدا ان cloudflare ليست على تلك الدرجة من الكفاءة. المشكلة الاخرى او بالاحرى المفاجأة الاخرى ان ما حصل مؤخرا سيتكرر و ربما باضرار اكثر مادامت كبرى المواقع تستعمل نفس الخدمة اي ان الضرر لو حدث فسيكون كارثيا. هل هناك من يمدنا ببيانات او حتى مجرد توقعات عن حجم الخسائر التي تكبدتها شركات و ربما افراد اؤضا بسبب حالة الشلل التي اصابت سوق الانترنت لعدة ساعات؟ من المفترض ان تقديرات موضوعية يمكنها تقدير ذلك و الاكيد ان العملية لم تمضي بسلام كما قد يعتقد البعض.

قمت ببعض البحث حول الخسائر التي يمكن أن يكون تسبب بها توقف cloudflare لبضعة ساعات لكنني لم أجد إجابات حول الموضوع حتى أنني سألت الذكاء الاصطناعي فأخبرني أنه لا توجد إجابات واضحة لأن الشركات تخفي مثل هذه البيانات عن خسائرها لتجنب الذعر أو التأثير على أسهمها وهذا جواب منطقي بالفعل. لذلك من الصعب جدا إيجاد مثل هذه البيانات حول حج الخسائر.

لكن أكثر المواقع تضررا كانت هي مواقع عالمية مثل منصات التواصل (X، Truth Social) وشركات الذكاء الاصطناعي والخدمات السحابية مثل OpenAI (ChatGPT وSora)، وشركات التجارة الإلكترونية مثل Shopify، لكن المدهش أن حجم الاعتماد العالمي كبير جدا نحو 20% من حركة الإنترنت العالمية تمر عبر Cloudflare. هذا رقم مهول بالفعل Huh