نعم أخي أنا أيضا سمعت نفس الشيء

هذا مقال يتحدث عن استمرار بينانس في خدمة العملاء الإيرانيين رغم الحظر لكن أتوقع أن هذا كان قبل أن تطلب بينانس تحقق KYC
لأنه بعد فرض تحقق KYC لن يتمكن المستخدمون من استخدام المنصة حتى لو استخدموا VPN
https://www.euronews.com/2022/07/11/fintech-crypto-binance-iran-exclusive

أتوقع نفس الشيء بالنسبة لروسيا وكوريا الشمالية

I believe this was the topic (pretty old though): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351078.0

Now I feel stupid! I have been on this forum for 2-3 years, I guess, and I never needed to create a self moderated topic and didn’t even know how to create one. I just realized there is a little checkbox in the additional options. LOL… I guess there is no end to learning, even if you become old enough..

That sounds great, I'll download Bitcoin Core and try it then.

So, you mean I don't need to have any of the blockchain downloaded to retrieve my keys - did I understand it correctly? I'll try it! (and, of course, I'm a She! hehe )

Thank you!

I don't think there's a way to change it, but I will definitely look into it. As I said, pinky promise we WON'T delete any comments, except for some spammy ones, but by spammy I don't mean bad reviews.


We do like criticism, and we are open to discuss anything, anytime. It's more about how we handle those bad reviews—since we are naturally born with different visions and thoughts. But you know, I cannot count a bad review, for example, when a player says: 'Why isn't it an instant withdrawal?' And the withdrawal takes about 36 seconds to arrive and be visible on the chain, and then those users are complaining.

All of those comments will be kept, and in the end, you will see how transparent we are and how simple and easy it is to operate when you are 100% honest and open, just as we were and always will be.

That is correct -- no strings attached.

Let us know your thoughts on our platform after you’ve played.





Yes, that’s an outdated terms page that we never actually used.. None of that documentation is relevant or accurate anymore. You’ll notice it mentions btc-ordinals. Will have that removed.
When we first started building, the idea was to launch as a no-KYC ordinal-focused casino, since the ordinal space was gaining momentum at the time. But as development progressed, that momentum completely faded. So we made a clear pivot. Instead of focusing on ordinals, we expanded to cover everything crypto -- and we haven’t looked back.
Since then, we’ve been consistently shipping new features, games, and improvements every month, all focused on delivering the best possible experience for our players.




Thanks for clarifying the load issue. Seems like it may have just been some sort of weird network delay on the first load for you. But we are going to look into seeing if this happens to other people on first loads or if it was a one off.  Appreciate the heads up.

Glad you like that we are working to improve it.  The release as mentioned will be coming very soon on that.  One thing you will notice with us at toshi.bet is that we are constantly improving our platform so that we live up to being the best no kyc online casino.

Definitely hit my dms with your username when you have a moment. We will be crediting new requests later today again. Look forward to hearing about your experience on our platform afterwards.


I think you are right to be skeptical. Bitcointalk appears to have seen its fair share of fly-by-night brands that show up, make big promises (like "no KYC"), and disappear or move on before anyone can hold them accountable.

That’s not who we are.

Toshi.bet has been live and running for over two years. In that time, not a single user has ever been asked for KYC.  We are proud of that track record. We didn’t just slap together a white-label site and rush here for quick exposure. We built our platform from scratch and spent those two years working closely with early crypto-native communities to refine the experience and prove we were serious.

We knew about Bitcointalk from the start, but we waited to engage until we could show real proof and not promises of who we are and what we stand for. Now we have a fully featured platform with vip benefits, slots, live dealer, sport book, original games in the Toshi Dojo, instant payouts, and a deeply engaged user base.

We are here because we want to be part of this community for the long haul. And if you stick around, we’ll prove that we are not just another crypto casino -- Toshi.bet is legitimately the best no kyc online casino.

Thank you, khaled0111,

Well, that would be great news, but for what I researched, Bitcoin Core needs to be able to identify the transaction which generated my key, and for that it needs at least the first 28 GB of the blockchain, which was its size when I got my BTCs. If I use Bitcoin Core with the pruned version, it'll only see the last so many transactions on the blockchain, and mine was way back in 2015.

I honestly don't know if this info is correct, but it's was what Chat GPT reasoned with me, so that's why I gave up on using Bitcoin Core and went after a way to get the keys extracted from the wallet.dat file. But if what you're saying is true, I would much rather do that and use Bitcoin Core. Hopefully someone can verify that info for us.

Thanks again!

Humans are greedy by nature so when they see an exploit to the system, they will definitely abuse it. Having a wagering requirement on promotions also ensures that only real gamblers will get the bonus not people who will just register for the free stuff then walk away.

I've seen some new casinos before that didn't thought of applying a wagering requirement on free spins bonus. Withdrawals were fast and easy during those times and KYC was still not mandatory. Users would create multiple accounts to use the free spin and wuthdraw what they won immediately. After few days, their website can't be accessed which likely they got bankrupt because of a loophole on their promotion.

Glad you like our humor.  You should check us on x.com/toshibet. It will definitely provide some laughs.

Regarding adding an affiliate code after registration, you may have already claimed it by clicking the link in my signature or post. It will be applied automatically, so no need for you to click anything. Its for 3 days after signing up.


Also, little teaser for you -- we are putting together some community events for bitcointalk users right now. Once we are ready, we will make additional announcements. I’m bringing it up now though as our team was just discussing rakebackboosts for bct members as one of the things we will be giving out.




I’m a bit confused on the issue you were having with support. Our support bottom on the bottom right is clickable and allows you to message our 24/7 live support so we can quickly answer any questions our customers have.  If you are saying it was not clickable for you then that is the first time we’ve heard of that, and we will definitely look into what could possibly be causing that.   

Happy to hear your support and the support from many of the members here regarding our commitment to no kyc.





---

Additionally to everyone -- if you dm’d me to claim funds and have not received yet please send me a follow up. I believe we got all of you pretty quickly but doesn’t hurt to double check.

Very much appreciate everyone who has already played that has given us their first experience feedback as well.

This is also a heads up to other community members that they are more than welcome to also still claim $10 to play on the best no kyc casino in the world 😉

I have read none from the representative so far from my lurking on the announcement threads that suggest using a VPN to bypass the geo-restriction when the casino officially announced on their TOS that the use of a VPN is prohibited to bypass the geo-restriction (if there is, maybe I am missing something).  In case the country is not banned and the user cannot access some games, that is when I read some representatives mentioning the use of VPN.


I think there is no sane representative to suggest the use of VPN when it is restricted on their TOS to bypass the geo-restriction.  It is really suspicious if someone from the representative suggests breaching their contract and I believe this is the tactic of shady casinos to entice users from the banned country then deprived them of the winnings whenever they hit big.

Infact vas majority of gamblers use mobile devices because of the convinces that comes with gaming with a small screen and the ease of access I mean is easier to gamble on the go on your mobile phone than it is to gamble with computer, like laptop, so I guess gambler only use laptop for just few in doors gaming and we have what we call gaming PC it specially designed for gamers I believe that fits best.

I do not think there is a way to remove or terminated self moderation from a thread you created to be self moderated, if there was, I believe the information would have been circulated well enough that most active forum users would have come across it and learn how to do it..

But all the same, please do report is later you found out it's possible to turn a self moderated thread into mod moderation..
This like you said isn't really a big deal so long as the op does not start deleting forum users comment when the user posts something the casino do not like, this is the only time the self moderated thing becomes a really big deal and most of us may begin to consider the casino to be a scam, because it's only scam casinos that do not like to take criticism.

It's nice to see the OP is finally back posting in the ANN. It would also be nice if you can drop an update in regards to the prohibited jurisdictions as the community has been asking for it. Would it be possible to clear some countries out of the list?


That's very sad to hear, which casinos are these? does this happen more on lesser knowns or not really? As we've seen platforms pulling out breach of ToS cards to withhold funds and/or deny bets, I'd be nervous to play there—if my place was from one of the prohibited jurisdictions.

Hi guys... I have contacted support and they said it is valid for 5 days from the email promotion received.

This is what I mean... the offer countdown when opening the email yesterday was blank and black, but now it looks normal, maybe my internet problem. hahah


The $20 coupon is quite a big deal, will enjoy it.
Have any of you received the same offer?

Thank you Gazeta, I've added your translation already.

In addition, I've updated our OP and there is a new mention to your 80 translations. But, as chances are that we'll need to update the OP to add katanic97 to our Hall of Fame soon, so as not to make our colleagues work twice, let's wait a bit before updating it in our respective local boards.

Sure, I'm trying to identify similar tools. I've shared more info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547830

I know, Porf... you are very modest...


Okay

---

I also translated BHC's topic: [Începători] Citiți asta înainte de a vă posta adresa.

At the moment, this topic has 4 translations and 6 more are needed. The available languages are: [POL] [GER] [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [TUR] [FIL] [PID] [BAN] [POR] [URD] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of cygan, paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus021, mindrust / mela65, Peanutswar, DSr_victory, Adiljutt156 and M47AK16.

   273. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1771 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   274. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   275. 657456: Nomad88 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (268 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   276. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   277. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   278. 705593: gt_addict (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   279. 751988: Taskford (Trust:  neutral) (416 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   280. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (426 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   281. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust:  neutral) (82 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   282. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (633 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   283. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1773 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   284. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust:  neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   285. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (762 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   286. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (220 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   287. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (953 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   288. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   289. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   290. 821689: Russlenat (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (535 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   291. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   292. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +65 / =1 / -0) (2603 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   293. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   294. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (834 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   295. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust:  neutral) (1517 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   296. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   297. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (494 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   298. 857883: Yatsan (Trust: +3 / =5 / -0) (761 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   299. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3877 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   300. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   301. 878630: TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (881 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   302. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust:  neutral) (2580 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   303. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +133 / =4 / -0) (6052 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   304. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust:  neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   305. 886369: michellee (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (380 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   306. 886521: mk4 (Trust:  neutral) (3639 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   307. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   308. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   309. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   310. 898928: Theb (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   311. 900408: spirits (Trust:  neutral) (962 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   312. 901819: TheLobster (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   313. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   314. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +38 / =1 / -0) (3358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   315. 910236: Woodie (Trust:  neutral) (830 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   316. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (1045 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   317. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1095 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   318. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (608 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   319. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   320. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   321. 935622: devans (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (268 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   322. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   323. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1916 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   324. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1003 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   325. 942911: entebah (Trust:  neutral) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   326. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =4 / -0) (975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   327. 954323: m.lov (Trust:  neutral) (331 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   328. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1188 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   329. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   330. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1981 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   331. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1174 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   332. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (704 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   333. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (1344 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   334. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   335. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   336. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust:  neutral) (5378 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   337. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   338. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (3090 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   339. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   340. 1015954: aundroid (Trust:  neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   341. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   342. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1297 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   343. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1574 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   344. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   345. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   346. 1046135: AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (469 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   347. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust:  neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   348. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2383 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   349. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4123 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   350. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (14213 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   351. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2670 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   352. 1071136: PHI1618 (Trust: #  +2 / =1 / -0) (1234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   353. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   354. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   355. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   356. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   357. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   358. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   359. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   360. 1105709: spider703 (Trust:  neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   361. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1967 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   362. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   363. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust:  neutral) (2456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   364. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1939 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   365. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   366. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (658 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   367. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1737 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   368. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1176 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   369. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust:  neutral) (2369 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   370. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   371. 1136512: Xylber (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   372. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust:  neutral) (2540 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   373. 1143728: Spazzer (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   374. 1153445: BitcoinBunny (Trust:  neutral) (2848 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   375. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1786 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   376. 1164586: gpfrag (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (14 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   377. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (3136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   378. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (2214 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   379. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (526 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   380. 1173695: sAj1420 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   381. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1555 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   382. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (18761 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   383. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1212 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   384. 1192397: paxmao (Trust:  neutral) (1566 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   385. 1202061: chimk (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (714 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   386. 1210149: ithd1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   387. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   388. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   389. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust:  neutral) (7301 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

شكرا للسؤال أخي خالد
في الواقع الأخ Sebastian Michaelis@ قام مشكورا بإرسال الأداة لي على الإيميل
قمت بتنزيلها وتجربتها في ذلك الوقت لكنها لم تعمل وفهمت من الرسالة التي ظهرت لي وقتها أن API التي تستخدمها الأداة تحظر سوريا لذلك لم تعمل ولم أتمكن من رؤية أداءها

بصراحة لم أجربها بعد أن تم فك الحظر عن سوريا ، سأجربها إن شاء الله في وقت لاحق وأخبرك بالنتائج أخي خالد

لا اعتقد ان هذا هو الحال مع كوكوين بالذات باعتبار انها منصة عريقة لها سمعتها في السوق. لو كانت منصة اخرى اقل حجما من كوكوين لربما كنت سأضع هامش لاعتبارات استثنائية لكن لا يجب ان يكون هذا هو الحال حتى لو اتفقنا ان العقوبات ظالمة و مجحفة في حق مستخدمين عاديين.

كوكوين تعمل وفق تراخيص نشاط ممنوحة لها ضمن أطر قانونية معينة و هي مثل غيرها من المنصات العريقة امتثلت للعقوبات الغربية على سوريا لان عدم الامتثال يعني سحب التراخيص و ربما ايقاف النشاط في اسواق عديدة مهمة بالاضافة الى تأثر مركزها في السوق وسط منافسيها الذين سيسارعون لاقتسام حصتها. في نفس هذا الاطار فانها لا تستطيع تغاضي النظر عن مستخدمين يستعملون وسائل تخفي VPN الا بوجود احدى الفرضيتين:
- ان تكون المنصة غير قادرة على رصد استعمال VPN من طرف حساب او اكثر و هو ما اجده فرضية شبه مستحيلة مع نظام كالذي لدى كيكوين قادر على التلاؤم مع كل التطورات.
- ان تكون المنصة تريد الاستفادة من هذه الحسابات التي تستعمل VPN. ليس ان تستفيد من رسوم الخدمة او من السيولة المتاحة لها على ارصدة اولئك المستخدمين. بل من الايداعات التي سيقوم بها هؤولاء الحسابات لتقوم بتجميد جميع الارصدة بحجة استخدام VPN و محاولة التلاعب بالنظام. هذه فرضية واردة ايضا و لكني استبعدها كثيرا لان لا احد سيصدق ان مستخدما استعمل VPN و وثق به حسابه و لم يتم التفطن له الا بعد ان قام بعمل ايداعات.

أشكرك أخي خالد على مساهمتك البناءة في هذا الموضوع، وآمل أن نكون عند حسن ظنك دائماً.

لا أعرف ما مررتَ به من تجربتك مع BountyPortals، لكن لا أعلم ماذا تقصد بالمنصة؟ كان موقع الويب عبارة عن موقع ومنصة تعريفية بهذا المشروع المسؤول عن التسويق والترويج للمشاريع في المنتدى، صراحةً كانت دائماً المشاريع التي يُديرها irfan وyahoo وHhampuz هي الأكثر ربحاً بالنسبة لي، لأنهم كانوا يهتمون دائماً بالتعاقد مع أصحاب المشاريع المرموقة للحفاظ على سمعتهم، وقد حققت مبالغ مهمة منذ تلك الفترة قبل أن أعتزل مجال حملات المكافآت بالكامل.
الآن Irfan وjulerz12 هم الذين ما زالوا مهتمين بهذا القطاع رغم كثرة المشاريع الاحتيالية ومديري المكافآت الجدد.

إخترنا Bptrades للوسطاء لتكون جزءاً من BountyPortals لأن المشروع يعمل منذ سنوات وقد اكتسب سمعة جيدة، مما سيساعد في انتشار خدمة الوساطة بشكل جيد.

Thanks, our previous post can confirm that too!

You were right at that point, dude, and @tropo also testified, and because he said it was a huge impact for other gambling casinos to trust, and I was one of those. This is also the case with the transparency of a casino.

And many more gamblers do not want MA KYC in a casino, which is what I see that it is properly practiced by this chilistakes correctly,
so I am happy with this implementation of their according to TOS that they have.

I can’t any specific details about this specific question. I’m just assuming that they encounter a technical problem on distributing the rewards which typically take some time to fix.

Although I think they are just using a delaying tactic that time since they still have active promotion.

Let’s wait when the team get back here.

The time has come for another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time for May 2025. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during May 2025

During the last month, 12794 posts were written across 18 local boards which is an increase compared to April's numbers (12356). Russian local board remained at the top, but Nigerian  is coming closer month after month and its just a matter of time before they overtake them.

---

Active members per local board during May 2025

During May, 1241 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local board which is a slight increase compared to month before (1236 during May), which is not a surprise given the increase in the amont of posts as well. In this chart Russian still has big advantage over the others, but we will see how that develops.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during May 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Romanian is the leader with 63%, while in the same time Pilipinas has only 9% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is the French local board with 55%, while on the other side Polish local has only 20% of the members who wrote between 2-9 posts.

And regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian local is the leader with 55% and at the bottom its Romanian local with only 13% of the members who wrote 10+ posts.

---

Merit shared per local board during May 2025

During the above mentioned period 7479 merit was sent acorss local boards that are part of this overview, which makes it a huge increase compared to April's numbers (5873). German local board is back at the top after poor Aoril's performance, narrowly beating Nigerian local while Russian local dropped to for them unusually low 3rd spot.

Majority of the local boards shared more merit than in April, with Nigerian local sticking out (904-1663). At the same time, Indonesian has a big decrease (from 619 down to 304).

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during May 2025

During May , the average merit per post ratio for local board was 0.58, meaning a big increase compared to April (0.48).

Romanian board is kinda messing up this chart once again, this time with even higher merit/post ratio than last month (just to add that this is not too unusual for less active boards)  followed far behind by German local board, while at the same time Pilipinas remiend the dead last wityh only 0.1 merit per post.

Given the recently appointed merit sources in many local boards, I expect this chart to looks much different in the next overview.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during May 2025

During May, 503 members sent while 620 received merit in once of the local boards, which is (an expected) increase compared to April (519 senders/579 receivers). Despite being 2nd on merit amount chart, Nigerian local dominates this chart, leaving all others far behind, and you can say that Indonesian also performed well consdiering their amount of merit sent.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during May 2025

Considering their crazy high merit per post ratio, no surprise to see Romanian board once again at the top with 52% of merited post, while far more active Nigerian, German and Italian are behind at around 30% mark.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during May 2025

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards. Here we have Greek local board sticking due fact that they only had 2 merit transaction during may, causing this unrealistically high merit per transaction value, while Romanian (another less active local board) also had unrealistically high number.

---

The most active members per local board during May 2025

And in the end, list of the most active local boards members. This time two members from Russian local board were the most active ones; klarki with 175 and jokers10 with 169 posts while joker_josue  from Portuguese local board was 3rd with 152 posts written in his local druing last month. Keep it up guys!
.

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [175]	|	1. MaxMueller [113]	|	1. yenerbatmaz [94]	|	1. babo [89]	|	1. joker_josue [152]	|	1. famososMuertos [56]	|
2. jokers10 [169]	|	2. Lakai01 [99]	|	2. mandown [87]	|	2. Ale88 [72]	|	2. bitmover [91]	|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [46]	|
3. Julien_Olynpic [133]	|	3. cygan [80]	|	3. blomen [77]	|	3. giorgione [60]	|	3. TryNinja [77]	|	3. Hispo [41]	|
4. zasad@ [94]	|	4. Soonandwaite [79]	|	4. execijutiere [61]	|	4. fillippone [55]	|	4. Forsyth Jones [59]	|	4. sausalitox [31]	|
5. xandry [88]	|	5. Real-Duke [75]	|	5. Mustang Shelby [60]	|	5. xenomorfo [49]	|	5. tg88 [55]	|	5. Porfirii [29]	|
6. Alex077 [85]	|	6. Unknown01 [59]	|	6. ajanwalker [56]	|	6. Plutosky [44]	|	6. Pumared [50]	|	6. darbitmobilerecovery [23]	|
7. safar1980 [74]	|	7. Koal-84 [52]	|	7. RaltcoinsB [57]	|	7. Lillominato89 [38]	|	7. r_victory [33]	|	7. seoincorporation [21]	|
8. Numeral [58]	|	8. Buchi-88 [51]	|	8. RaltcoinsB [57]	|	8. gbianchi [34]	|	8. mikel_012 [32]	|	8. d5000 [19]	|
9. mak013 [57]	|	9. MinoRaiola [48]	|	9. ajanwalker [56]	|	9. bastisisca [31]	|	9. non fungible anxiety [32]	|	9. Drawesome [15]	|
10. eisen33 [53]	|	10. willi9974 [47]	|	10. Hvdv [52]	|	10. bitbollo [26]	|	10. Mindyspace [31]	|	10. darxiaomi [14]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [90]	|	1. Becassine [21]	|	1. Peanutswar [41]	|	1. katanic97 [63]	|	1. Charles-Tim [60]	|	1. Kavelj22 [30]
2. punk.zink [44]	|	2. patrickus [20]	|	2. gunhell16 [34]	|	2. btcltcdigger [45]	|	2. Joy- maker [43]	|	2. khaled0111 [27]
3. Husna QA [42]	|	3. Danydee [19]	|	3. cryptoaddictchie [33]	|	3. Rikafip [38]	|	3. Africolo [41]	|	3. yhiaali3 [25]
4. mu_enrico [34]	|	4. Saint-loup [8]	|	4. Mr. Magkaisa [30]	|	4. Pmalek [30]	|	4. Sonia_123 [35]	|	4. satoshyat.team [19]
5. MAAManda [31]	|	5. G.Seed [6]	|	5. GreatArkansas [25]	|	5. Trofo [30]	|	5. Tonimez [34]	|	5. GxSTxV [16]
6. Luzin [29]	|	6. tuxo [6]	|	6. PX-Z [24]	|	6. dkbit98 [27]	|	6. Josefjix [33]	|	6. OmegaStarScream [8]
7. joniboini [25]	|	7. Halab [4]	|	7. serjent05 [24]	|	7. slackovic [27]	|	7. Mate2237 [32]	|	7. Privatus [8]
8. len01 [25]	|	8. coupable [4]	|	8. Fredomago [22]	|	8. cryptofrka [25]	|	8. CryptoHeadlineNews [30]	|	8. albon [4]
9. armanda90 [23]	|	9. Angroid [2]	|	9. bhadz [22]	|	9. examplens [24]	|	9. POPOLUV [28]	|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [3]
10. Rashlyowl [22]	|	10. GrosWesh [2]	|	10. blockman [22]	|	10. ovcijisir [23]	|	10. Princess Leah [28]	|	10. hugeblack [3]

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [27]	|	1. IIrik11 [26]	|	1. condoras [19]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [14]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [39]	|	1. DYING_S0UL [22]	|
2. pawel7777 [4]	|	2. JSRAW [25]	|	2. Ultegra134 [14]	|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [35]	|	2. Nothingtodo [19]	|
3. bitbartek [1]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [14]	|	3. coctailnuts [6]	|	3. UsdtBucuresti [2]	|	3. GbitG [25]	|	3. Bd officer [18]	|
4. shual1982als [1]	|	4. TheUltraElite [8]	|	4. apogio [4]	|	4. IonCreanga [1]	|	4. Cheema02 [22]	|	4. Shishir99 [16]	|
5. stwenhao [1]	|	5. M47AK16 [5]	|	5. BitcoinsGreece [3]	|	5. amsterdamlucian [1]	|	5. MusaPk [22]	|	5. Crypto Library [12]	|
	|	6. henry1111 [4]	|	6. changlee [2]	|	6. ethanhunt2023 [1]	|	6. Rustam Meraj [22]	|	6. HelliumZ [12]	|
	|	7. libert19 [4]	|	7. Dimitris [1]	|	7. jedaite [1]	|	7. ZAINmalik75 [22]	|	7. LDL [12]	|
	|	8. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|	8. RnBMC.official [1]	|	8. shinotabu28u [1]	|	8. Publictalk792 [16]	|	8. Bluedrem [11]	|
	|	9. Mastercon [2]	|	9. alani123 [1]	|		|	9. UmerIdrees [15]	|	9. Mahiyammahi [11]	|
	|	10. Orange89 [2]	|	10. mastercryptogr [1]	|		|	10. Compromise me [14]	|	10. Hossain Risfa [9]	|

We need to have a minor bump here before the thread closes.

To our active players.

صحيح، شخصيا ارى انه من الافضل دمج المدخلات على دفعات صغيرة لتجنب فقدان كامل للخصوصية، لكن الامر يعتمد على مدى اهتمام الشخص بخصوصية معاملاته اصلا، ومعظم الاشخاص لا يهتمون بذلك.
مع ذلك فمن الافضل دمج المدخلات عندما تكون الرسوم منخفضة في حالة ما الشخص يرسل ويستقبل البيتكوين بانتظام، خاصة اذا كانت المعاملات صغيرة القيمة.

That situation is very disappointing especially that you need to get an immediate clarification on your inquiries.

If they perform so bad especially on their support department many people would start to doubt or maybe think about that they are not good casino to deal with.

So if they really want to run a serious business here they better hire more staff to handle their support well. Since if they remain to be like that and people will continue to get disappointed the way they receive late response from them then provably that many gamblers would stay away on their casino.

No need to think about youtubers and streamers as we don't know the real. But we can enjoy their show and considering that is for entertainment only. If you just attract because of them, that will be a mistake because they just serve the entertainment side and not making money.

But many people tempting to follow what they did so people lose their money without making money. It needs awareness to realize that is for entertainment and not teach people to use their money to gamble.

You can use minimum bet to gambling and make you gamble longer. But there is no guarantee you can win the games or hit high multipliers. But you will only have a chance to lose your money anytime.

Exactly. But no wonder he came up with such logic. Looking at his signature, I understand that he always focuses on increasing the number of posts to get maximum payment, and he does not have enough time to think about what he is writing here. All he wants is to generate more and more posts so he can get more money from his signature campaign.

I don't see any other logic why would someone come up with such logic. A gmabler should always reach the support no matter if it's a big problem or a tiny problem. The support is there to help the customers.

Slot just always speculation, the things you are did is your gambling fallancy. I agree with @mu_enrico is just gambling fallancy. Do you even know, we have some gambling fallancy, like:
- New slot give big wins
- Pragmatic play 100-120 spin for scatter to be hits

And the things you just mentioned, none of these can be prove or having fixed information. So, mostly just speculated and gambling fallancy. Even we all thinking the more you lose the more you will get a chance to win but honestly is not. Each spin, and each bet the chance are same like...... you betting dice with 50% chance win and you can lose a couple times in a row and believe each lost increase the chance but the reality is not. Your bet will always having 50% chance, no matter how much you lose.

I believe it's just one kind of gambler's fallacy.
If you do low bets, usually you'll spin more, meaning you'll get more chances to hit a big multiplier. Meanwhile, if you're high rolling, you can't do it for long (well, except you're already crazy rich), therefore lower chances to win.

I'm pretty sure it's just a coincidence. After you make hundreds/thousands of bonus purchases, you'll see that the result is completely unpredictable. I remember getting a 500x+ multiplier on 1st spin, and the rest 14 spins were trash. Conversely, I remember getting 0 multipliers on the first 14 spins, but getting a huge win on the last spin.

From experience, some support staff do not have in-depth knowledge about the project they represent. That is when such wrong advice could be given. If a casino is not accessible in a particular region, it shows that the casino isn't in agreement with the government and policies of that country. So, if the customer wants to bypass the restrictions, it should be according to their own discretion and they should take responsibility of that also.

A support staff or casino representative advice you to bypass with VPN even when the use of VPN is prohibited in their ToS is a setup.