khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: Davidvictorson on April 08, 2026, 08:55:56 PM

Quote from: noorman0 on April 08, 2026, 04:34:16 PM

Regular rules still apply, meaning they don't have a maximum deposit/withdrawal limit without KYC. Even if they were required to, the reason is often because players violated the rules, not the sum of money involved.

That's correct, most casinos will tell you that they can request for KYC at anytime if they have any suspicion - so even if they say that they are are no-kyc casino that doesn't mean that they can't request for KYC if they have a reason to.

In the Terms of Service, the only reference I can see to ‘KYC’ states that it will not be required for withdrawals.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 08, 2026, 11:49:10 PM

It’s wise to keep this in mind. However and to be fair, 2Up has been here for quite some time now and no one has complained or said he has been asked to pass kyc. As I said, they have been around for months so It’s highly likely that some gamblers have made large withdrawals.
I also checked some old complaints on the accusation board that have been raised against 2Up and even the accusers who their accounts got blocked (for whatever reason), no one of them was asked to verify his identity.

This is consistent with what they advertise. Even cases of cheating by some gamblers can be dealt with without requiring KYC.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 06, 2026, 11:36:19 PM

Quote from: yhiaali3 on April 02, 2026, 02:36:21 AM

هذا بالفعل لايوجد نظيره في التاريخ أن اختراع ما يكون لامركزي بشكل كامل حتى أن مخترعه لايملكه أو يملك السيطرة عليه، البيتكوين يعتبر ملك البشرية جمعاء وليس ملك ساتوشي أو أي شخص آخر، هذا مذهل حقا وبقدر ما يظهر عظمة البيتكوين يظهر أيضا عظمة ساتوشي الذي اخترع هذا الاختراع المذهل ثم تخلى عن كل شيء واختفى ببساطة.

هو امر مدهش بالفعل اخي يحيى. لكن و لكي اكون صريحا، اجد صعوبة في تقبل ان يقدر اي شخص، مهما كانت القيم و المبادئ التي يؤمن بها، ان يقاوم الاغراءات لسحب و بيع كل تلك الكمية من البيتكوين او حتى اغراءات الشهرة خاصة في عصرنا هذا.
طبعا هناك استثناءات لكن اغلب الاشخاص الذين عرفوا بحدة ذكائهم و قاموا باكتشافات عظيمة لكنهم لم يسعوا خلف المال و الشهرة هم قلة و غالبا ما كانت نهايتهم مأساوية و منهم حتى من اصيب بالجنون.
هناك احتمال اخر و هو ان يكون ساتوشي، ان افترضنا انه شخص واحد، غنيا بالاساس او تمكن من تحقيق ارباح بطريقة اخرى و لذلك لا يحتاج لتحريك تلك المحافظ و بيع ما تحتويه.

غالبا لا يمكن ان يكون هذا الانجاز العظيم من ابداع شخص واحد بسبب كثرة التفاصيل التقنية التي تتطلب عملا جماعيا و ليس بالسهولة التي يمكن لشخص واحد ان يعمل عليه الا اذا كان شخصا متفرغا بالكامل بدون مشاغل و له ميزانية كافية و وقت لامحدود لان هذا سيتطلب سنوات من الجهد و التطوير و التجربة و المحاولة. فرضية ان يكون ساتوشي شخصا واحدا تتضاءل بمرور الزمن خصوصا مع تلك العناوين النائمة و كأنها فقدت مفاتيحها.

لازلنا نرى عناوين نائمة تتحرك من فترة لاخرى و يمكن ملاحظة مدى تأثير تلك التحركات في السوق. و لا غرابة ان تكون عناوين ساتوشي مخزونا استراتيجيا لهيئة او منظمة او حتى مؤسسة حكومية تنتظر الوقت المناسب لاستخدام تلك الثروات النائمة. اي شخص عادي لابد ان يقع نحت الاغراءات بشكل او باخر مهما بلغت درجة حرصه. صورة ساتوشي كما نعرفها تبدو مثالية جدا لشخص نزيه تماما و مصلح و على قدر من الحكمة و الانسانية و هي صفات تبعده عن الطبيعة البشرية المليئة بالتناقضات.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 03, 2026, 08:59:35 PM

Quote from: leonair on April 03, 2026, 07:59:28 PM

If the previous data is deleted, it will not cause any financial problems to the user because the users have already found the solution to the previous transaction histories so they are not very important data, but for a responsible gambler it could be good data to track how much they have gambled in the past, how much they have won, how much they have lost, how much they have deposited and withdrawn,

It may be important for some users while others might not be interested in it at all and probably had never opened that tab. However, the most important thing is that this update will not affect any user financially, as already said.
For more convenience, it would be great if all services add a feature allowing users to download their account activity whenever they want. This way, even if a technical issue arises and causes data loss, users would still have a copy of it that they can access locally.

That’s a very fair take, and we appreciate you sharing your perspective on it.

You’re right, for many players it may not be critical, but for those who like to track their activity, historical data can definitely be useful.

Just to clarify, while individual transaction-level data from Version 1 may not be available directly to players, we have ensured that overall/aggregated data is still carried over, so players can still get a clear view of their general stats and activity on the platform.

We understand the importance of this for responsible tracking, and feedback like yours really helps us improve how we present this information going forward. Thanks again for the input!

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 06, 2026, 11:36:19 PM

هناك احتمال اخر و هو ان يكون ساتوشي، ان افترضنا انه شخص واحد، غنيا بالاساس او تمكن من تحقيق ارباح بطريقة اخرى و لذلك لا يحتاج لتحريك تلك المحافظ و بيع ما تحتويه.

لا ننسي ان ما نعرفه هو الحسابات المرتبطة باسم ساتوشي وليس جميع العملات التي قام ساتوشي بجمعها وبالتالي يمكن ان يكون ساتوشي قد جمع بالفعل الالاف العملات تحت اي اسم مستعار آخر وبالتالي فمن يملك 10 الف بيتكوين لن يفكر بضياع اي مبلغ آخر خصوصا وان للشهره ضريبة حيث سيقوم الناس بتتبع كل تصريحاته وكل الاماكن التي قد يزورها او المشاريع التي قد يستثمر بها لذلك فمن هذا المنظور قد لا يحتاج لتلك العملات المرتبطة بهذا الاسم.

هذا ان افترضنا ان ساتوشي هو مطور واحد وليس مشروع

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on March 30, 2026, 09:18:19 AM

—snip—

[ENG Tutorial] PGP Signature - Encrypt/Decrypt message - Fingerprint by mdayonliner and Learn Bitcoin: this topic lacks translations in [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [TUR] [URD] [HIN] [CRO] [SER] [SWE], so this should be in the attention of paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, HUSNA QA / dansus021, mindrust / mela65, Adiljutt156 M47AK16, katanic97 and Baseplate

I’ve already written about PGP in Indonesian, and mdayonliner used it as one of the references for his own PGP topic, as you can see from his statement here:

Quote from: mdayonliner on May 21, 2018, 01:18:56 AM

—snip—
Husna QA: The topic PGP/GPG Signed Message - Public Key in his/her local language was the starter for me to start my learning. I am happy that I was good enough to understand the translation in English.

Friends who have translated mdayonliner’s PGP topic (the one reposted by Learn Bitcoin) have definitely seen that write-up.
So, it would be pretty confusing if I translated that same topic on the same local board (Indonesia).

Quote from: Porfirii on April 03, 2026, 02:57:44 PM

Dear AoBTers,

I'm really sad to share this news with us. In Spain we've just started vacations, and this is the last kind of thing you want to hear about when you finally take a well-deserved period of rest, but anyway.

A member of the Alliance has written to me because he doesn't agree with the result of the last voting. In brief, he says that our Arabic translators' behaviour is intolerable and that me as the manager of this community should act accordingly. He has asked me not to respond to his PM and made it clear that he won't answer or participate in anything related to AoBT until this situation is resolved (if ever).

Since he asked me not to reply to his PM, and I respect it, I will just share my thoughts here with all of us, as this is of interest of all.
—snip—

Sorry, in this voting, I abstain.

When I am asked for an opinion on whether a certain user who is applying to join should be accepted or not, it is sometimes difficult because I do not fully understand whether the translation language they use is already good and correct or not.

For that, what if the moderators on their local board were also asked for their opinion about the credibility of the user who is applying to join AoBT?

Then, regarding users who are not active, maybe it is necessary to provide a more detailed explanation of what criteria make them fall into the inactive category.
The suggestion from zasad above can also be considered.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 03, 2026, 11:54:35 PM

Just to be clear, I’m not trying to defend Blocino here or taking any side, but to be honest, not many casinos accept forum members as mediators and are willing to share users’ personal information with them. If I'm not mistaken, this happened only once or twice.
CoffeeSipper64, you need to understand that if you want to alert the community, then the best way to do this is by convincing DT members to support your flag. If DT members see that you sent them an email and they didn’t respond, they will support the flag and it will become active and visible for everyone.

From my point of view, the case is not that complicated to be solved.
The casino accused player for having multi accounts and bonus abuse, I think it is not that hard to prove it if I were in the casino's position.
Especially the accused player have already given the permission for the casino to reveal the proof publicly (no need any mediator).
By simply proving the data of the suspected multiple accounts especially the connection between those accounts, case can be closed easier.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 01, 2026, 10:39:07 PM

Quote from: dimonstration on April 01, 2026, 12:33:50 PM

It’s not worth it to pursue bonus considering how hard the rules of every casino bonus is. I’m surprised how some casino still managed to complain about bonus abuse most notably those who has x40 wagering requirements and more since that requirements is almost a gatekeep to the bonus claim.

Although abusers usually act like bots (some may actually use real bots), they create an account, claim the bonus, fulfill the requirements then withdraw whatever profit they make then rinse and repeat, they are not completely dumb. They know which bonuses to target. They will certainly never try to abuse a bonus that requires making a deposit upfront and fulfilling a high wagering requirement. Most, if not all of them, are only after no-deposit bonuses offered by no-kyc casinos.
What many of them don’t realize, though, is that being no-kyc doesn’t mean the casino doesn’t have other anti-cheating measures that help them spot cheaters.

Fulfilling the actually require on casinos can be a difficult part of trying to make free money from a casino.
Even though you have the time to create different accounts on a casino, they will still ask you to make a deposit and give you wagering requirement and if you are able to fulfill the expected requirements, that is when you can withdraw the bonus offer and what you had used it to make. Many casinos are smart now and there is no way they will give you bonus without a wagering requirement as a new user.

Quote from: Rockson1 on April 03, 2026, 12:12:51 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 02, 2026, 11:23:01 PM

I think I remember the case Hazink was talking about and if I’m not mistaken, this issue was brought up in a thread on the scam accusation board. So yes, things like this happen and this is exactly why you need to be extra careful with the information you get from customer support. We all know that most of them are outsourced or just low wage freelancers who are not well informed about the service they represent or its terms. It’s mainly the service’s fault for hiring incompetent staff and not making them go through a training program before starting the actual work.

It is a red flag if a casino representative does not know the terms and conditions of the casino they are representing athough I agree to what you said that it is the fault of the casino not only because the employed them without knowing what they are capable of, if an employer wants to hire anyone especially when such employer is very much interested in such person skills, they should put them under probation periods which is also a grace and learning period to enable them not to mess up things or even the full training as you suggested, they can consider to continuously ask them some of questions that relates to those important areas to know if they have learnt before proceeding to giving them offer, you are actually right dude.

This can be very hilarious reading some comments here! How possible could it be that a casino support does not know the terms of service of the casino he is working for? The reality can be very surprising if the support is newly employed and have no experience at all about what he needed to know when working as support that gives answers to users queries.

376. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (1249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +15 / =6 / -0) (1163 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1087 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1420 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
383. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (739 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
384. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
385. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
386. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3330 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
387. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
388. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
389. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3253 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
390. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
391. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
392. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
393. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
394. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
395. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
396. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1824 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
397. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
398. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
399. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust: neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
400. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
401. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (5132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
402. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2647 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
403. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2888 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
404. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
405. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
406. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
407. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
408. 1080073: Spack17 (Trust: neutral) (287 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
409. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
410. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
411. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
412. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
413. 1105709: spider703 (Trust: neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
414. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2385 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
415. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
416. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust: neutral) (2900 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
417. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
418. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
419. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (753 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
420. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1818 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
421. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1408 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
422. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust: neutral) (2370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
423. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
424. 1136512: Xylber (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
425. 1137750: bavicrypto (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
426. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust: neutral) (2823 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
427. 1153445: BitcoinBunny (Trust: neutral) (2876 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
428. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust: neutral) (1786 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
429. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1371 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
430. 1164586: gpfrag (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (16 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
431. 1166480: Julien_Olynpic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5012 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
432. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3137 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
433. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (2234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
434. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
435. 1173695: sAj1420 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
436. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1566 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
437. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (18887 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
438. 1192397: paxmao (Trust: neutral) (1635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
439. 1210149: ithd1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
440. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1758 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
441. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
442. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust: neutral) (8520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
443. 1237522: Plutosky (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5158 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
444. 1239916: ZipReg (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (842 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
445. 1260847: creep_o (Trust: neutral) (1001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
446. 1275282: joniboini (Trust: neutral) (1879 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
447. 1283017: masulum (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1815 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
448. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +55 / =0 / -0) (579 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
449. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3342 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
450. 1292764: notocactus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4924 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
451. 1297306: haloxon (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
452. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1511 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
453. 1385147: ILuckyGuyI (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
454. 1392550: zeki555 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
455. 1410401: dkbit98 (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (8601 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
456. 1422438: Paolo.Demidov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2598 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
457. 1433865: witcher_sense (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (4439 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
458. 1464056: Mrstacy (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
459. 1478835: MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +57 / =0 / -0) (3330 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
460. 1541583: sky999 (Trust: neutral) (785 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
461. 1545702: DeepMining76 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (22 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
462. 1564795: Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1281 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
463. 1573369: casperBGD (Trust: neutral) (1152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
464. 1574226: mu_enrico (Trust: neutral) (2362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
465. 1583465: Dernoste (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
466. 1593137: famososMuertos (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4040 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
467. 1644820: bitcoiner24h (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
468. 1681586: RickDeckard (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
469. 1695463: Speculatoross (Trust: neutral) (353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
470. 1729238: UmerIdrees (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (936 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
471. 1762404: Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
472. 1775670: bubbalex (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
473. 1781771: Mbitr (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
474. 1803753: Kylapoiss (Trust: neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
475. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
476. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2608 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
477. 1855828: taikuri13 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1715 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
478. 1883627: shasan (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (1402 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
479. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2638 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
480. 1903411: BITCOIN4X (Trust: neutral) (1193 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
481. 1926710: Renato297 (Trust: neutral) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
482. 1932205: CucakRowo (Trust: neutral) (593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
483. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
484. 2000200: 1Dq (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
485. 2003707: kawetsriyanto (Trust: neutral) (1178 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
486. 2005913: Corrosive (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
487. 2033515: mikeywith (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (7143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
488. 2129514: VashaUdacha777 (Trust: neutral) (85 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
489. 2136362: TalkStar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
490. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +8 / =6 / -0) (7569 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
491. 2148411: DIKUL (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
492. 2154195: Nikisa (Trust: neutral) (217 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
493. 2160117: Harkorede (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (1071 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
494. 2168312: yhiaali3 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
495. 2178170: Sayeds56 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
496. 2204241: ICOEthics (Trust: +23 / =1 / -0) (892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
497. 2221613: FontSeli (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (858 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
498. 2376653: Coyster (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1421 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 03, 2026, 11:32:23 PM

كيف تم التفطن لذلك الشاب الذي كان يستعمل كروت شاشة للتعدين و لم يتم التفطن لتلك الشركة التي قامت بادخال اجهزة تعدين عديدة عبر الحدود!

الفرق واضح بين شاب يملك معدات بسيطة يضعها في غرفته او في مخزن بالبيت متاح لان يلاحظه اي شخص او يشتبه به، و شركة لديها الميزانيات اللازمة للقيام بكل التنظيمات اللازمة. غالبا فان ذلك الشاب قد روى القصة لبعض معارفه الذين نشروا الخبر مما استدعى السلطات للتحرك لانه من شبه المستحيل انه تم رصد نشاطه دون ان لا تكون هناك وشاية سابقة او تتبع مبني على اشتباه. الشركة على الجانب الاخر يمكنها توفير الحماية التامة للاجهزة مع التكتم على الامر و غالبا اذا سأل احد عن تلك الاجهزة فيمكن ببساطة الادعاء انها خاصة بسلسلة الانتاج في وحدة التصنيع و خوادم بيانات او حتى مضخات هواء.

لا يمكنني الجزم بأن هذا يحصل فقط في دولنا العربية بل اتوقع انه وارد الحصول في كل الدول التي تقدم كهرباء رخيصة اذا لم تكن هناك تشريعات تنظم قطاع تعدين العملات المشفرة بشكل واضح.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 03, 2026, 07:58:32 PM

Quote from: Kelvinid on April 03, 2026, 01:10:20 PM

The same thing here. I'm not sure whether the issue is with my internet connection or the site itself, as I visit other casinos that work fine.

Are you guys still facing the same issue? I just checked and opened the website on my mobile browser and it loads really fast with no problems. All the games load fast as well. I had the same positive experience when I visited the casino for the first time yesterday.
So unless you are still experiencing this issue till now then this most likely a temporary problem that has already been resolved.
The website design seems simple, which shouldn’t cause any latency even on low spec mobile devices.

I don't know internet issues or not but opening the website of Dustbit running well just get problem when opening the pragmatic games, its fully blank can't open yet due my country restrict or not but this games after waiting more than 30 second still blank not open yet.

Looks the same when opening sport games but still blank and I don't know is the mistake my internet or my IP address but opening the website of Dustbit is running well. I got problem when opening all casino and sport games there are not any game can't to open. I think need respond from the team or OP about this cases have any specific country restrict for access the Dustbit casino gambling?

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:59:32 PM

Quote from: CoffeeSipper64 on Today at 10:17:29 PM

...

It seems like you are going in circles and this is not how to get this case resolved. Did you send an email giving them consent to share proof as they requested? If you didn’t, then send one giving them consent to share any information (including personal data) that was used to link the suspected accounts with the mediator (make sure to mention his name and include a link to his profile on this forum). I don’t see why you wouldn’t do that.
If you already sent it, you can share a screenshot of the email here so everyone knows that you did and that they are the ones stalling.

One can not get his case resolved against scammers abusing the terms of their circus site to confiscate funds of users willing to test it out.
My purpose was not to resolve my came but to alert all of you here.
If you or anyone else is not convinced of their shady ways,please go ahead and deposit your own funds on their site.

I have given them permission to post here all evidence of my supposed breach of their terms for days now.
I won't be directly contacting the scammers in any other way ,but only here for all of your to see the interaction.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:59:32 PM

Quote from: CoffeeSipper64 on Today at 10:17:29 PM

...

It seems like you are going in circles and this is not how to get this case resolved. Did you send an email giving them consent to share proof as they requested? If you didn’t, then send one giving them consent to share any information (including personal data) that was used to link the suspected accounts with the mediator (make sure to mention his name and include a link to his profile on this forum). I don’t see why you shouldn’t do that.
If you already sent it, you can share a screenshot of the email here so everyone will know that you did.

This won't change anything because the casino is using it as an excuse not to reveal the proofs that the user broke some rules from the Tos. The casino representative is in argue about to reveal those proofs, not to solve anything. Like their decision is final and the user just has to send them a request to show the proof to a mediator. This is bullshit as you see.

I asked him to send me the proofs and CoffeeSipper also asked them to do it in public, even he has the right to get a valid explanation if the reasons are legit. Guess what should be the reasons to confiscate $600 from someone!

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 01, 2026, 10:59:35 PM

Quote from: leonair on April 01, 2026, 09:56:11 PM

Yes, it is not a very difficult thing for them because they have the data of every user. But I can see that so far my transaction history does not have any previous history, only the history of the transactions that are currently happening. Maybe when their development is completely finished, they will export the data.

OP already addressed this in his last reply and said that they are not going to do that, they won’t migrate old data to the new platform. I’m not sure why but they certainly have valid reasons.
The good thing, according to what they have said, is that only transaction history and some other old data won’t be migrated and this won’t apply to more important data such as affiliate data and the like, so there will be no financial impact on users.

If the previous data is deleted, it will not cause any financial problems to the user because the users have already found the solution to the previous transaction histories so they are not very important data, but for a responsible gambler it could be good data to track how much they have gambled in the past, how much they have won, how much they have lost, how much they have deposited and withdrawn, and compare them with the current one. Apart from this, the previous transaction history has no other function. For me, it is not a problem if I cannot find the previous histories because I gamble once or twice a week so I do not check the previous histories too much.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 02, 2026, 11:59:20 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on April 02, 2026, 11:43:51 PM

Ok I can understand your arguments very well because actually this is what happening. This is to make things easier for casino to attract as many deposits as possible then we will argue later with verification matters. Casinos can set the option for users to complete KYC procedures whenever they want whenever they feel ready, not just under casino request.

This is a very good point. If we are going to accept that it’s okay for casinos to not ask for identity verification upon registration and only enforce it on the first withdrawal then we, as users, should also be given the possibility to verify our identity at any time before that if we choose to. Many users would like to make sure they can pass kyc successfully before deciding to make a deposit to avoid any future issues. So this would be fair for both parties, I guess.

It is fair for both parties like it usually happened with exchange platforms where users can register just by confirming his email and start using the service without any problem except for withdrawal which is related to identity verification. The user isn't forbidden to use any option including completing identity verification the time he set at his own will. With casinos, they promote the identity verification process as a feature, then when the user makes his first win, problem begins. Sometimes it is not even related to withdrawal but to try to manipulate the user itself.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 02, 2026, 11:23:01 PM

I think I remember the case Hazink was talking about and if I’m not mistaken, this issue was brought up in a thread on the scam accusation board. So yes, things like this happen and this is exactly why you need to be extra careful with the information you get from customer support. We all know that most of them are outsourced or just low wage freelancers who are not well informed about the service they represent or its terms. It’s mainly the service’s fault for hiring incompetent staff and not making them go through a training program before starting the actual work.

It is a red flag if a casino representative does not know the terms and conditions of the casino they are representing athough I agree to what you said that it is the fault of the casino not only because the employed them without knowing what they are capable of, if an employer wants to hire anyone especially when such employer is very much interested in such person skills, they should put them under probation periods which is also a grace and learning period to enable them not to mess up things or even the full training as you suggested, they can consider to continuously ask them some of questions that relates to those important areas to know if they have learnt before proceeding to giving them offer, you are actually right dude.

Quote from: khaled0111 on March 31, 2026, 11:58:46 PM

-snip-

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 08:42:56 AM

-snip-

و لهذا السبب بالتحديد قمت بالماضي بانشاء موضوع حول تعدين مونيرو، لأنها العملة الوحيدة ذات قيمة معتبرة التي مازال بامكان الجميع تعدينها عن طريق معالجات الحواسيب (حتى و ان كانت تحتاج الى استثمار معتبر و كهرباء رخيصة/مجانية).

Cheesy

(يوجد هذا النوع من الأجهزة للبيتكوين لكنها لا تنافس الأجهزة الكبيرة بأي شكل من الأشكال بطبيعة الحال) في انتظار اختراع أجهزة صغيرة للبيتكوين

نسأل الله أن تتحسن أحوال بلداننا.

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on March 31, 2026, 03:02:29 PM

Quote from: Ochan_yazo_tochant on March 31, 2026, 01:58:47 PM

-snip-
نحن في فصل الربيع هل سيكون أخضراً على سوق التشفير أم أن الربع الثاني من العام سيصدم الكثير؟

.

أنا الان مقتنع تماما أن البيتكوين و العملات المشفرة لن ترى النور حتى انتهاء عهدة ترامب. (بغض النظر ان فاز جمهوري أخر أو ديموقراطي)

صحيح أن ترامب أصبح كابوسا لمختلف الأسواق العالمية، لقد بدأ يجبر حلفاء النيتو على التدخل من خلال المشاركة في شن هجمات على إيران كما صرح أن أمريكا ستنسحب من الحلف في حالة لم تشارك في الحرب. بعدها مباشرة تعرضت الأسواق لتراجع في الأسعار سوى أسواق الطاقة شهدت إرتفاعاً غير ملحوظ.

Quote from: khaled0111 on March 31, 2026, 11:49:33 PM

.
بالنسبة لارتفاع اسعار الطاقة فهو امر مفهوم و متوقع تماما و خاصة مع ما قامت به ايران من غلق لمضيق هرمز و مهاجمة او التهديد بمهاجمة منشآت الطاقة في المنطقة. غير المفهوم هو ما يحدث مع سوق الذهب الذي كان يجب ان يعرف ازدهارا ملحوظا!
لست متاكدا من هذا المعلومة لكن اعتقد ان تأثر هذه الاسواق بهذه الحرب كان اكبر من تأثرها بالحرب الروسية الاوكرانية. هل هذا صحيح؟

فعلاً الأسواق التقليدية دائما ما تكون هي الملاذ الأمين أثناء الحروب كالدولار و الذهب. و لكن ما نراه الآن الأمر مختلف تماما، أعتقد تراجع هذه الأسواق كان بسبب تحويل المستثمرين أموالهم إلى الكاش لأن الدولار بدأ يشهد قفزة و أيضاً شراء أصول الخزانة الأمريكية بسبب إرتفاع نسبة الفائدة من 4% إلى 4,39% هذا ما جعل المستثمرين من تغيير الإتجاهات أي اللعب في الجهة الأمينة كما يشير روبيرت كيوساكي في كتابه الأب الفقير و الأب الغني.

على الأرجح الفائز الوحيد في هذه المعركة هو ترامب لأنه يوجه الأسواق لصالحه و شركائه في الأعمال. لذلك أتفق مع الأخ أوميغا بشأن عهدة ترامب.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 01, 2026, 08:59:56 PM

That’s a great bonus, indeed! For anyone interested, there are still only three hours left to claim it, so hurry up if you don’t want to miss it (minimum deposit to be eligible for this bonus is $100).
Just one question regarding the 10x rollover requirement, are we supposed to wager the deposited amount 10 times or only the bonus amount? I think this informaion makes a big difference.

Hi! thanks for feedback ! The 10x wagering requirement applies to the bonus amount 👍

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 01, 2026, 11:58:32 PM

كان من الممتع قراءة تلك المواضيع و الاطلاع على الاحتمالات الممكنة، لكن اكثر الاحتمالات التي وجدتها منطقية هي ان حدوث اي من ذلك لن يكون له تأثير لا على وجود البيتكوين و لا على سعره. يمكن ان يتأثر السعر لفترة معينة سواءا ايجابيا او سلبيا، لكن البيتكوين سيواصل الوجود بشكل طبيعي و السبب هو طبيعته اللامركزية التي بني عليها.
ساتوشي رغم كونه المؤسس او مخترع البيتكوين، لم تعد تربطه فعليا من الناحية التقنية اي صلة به باستثناء العملات التي عدنها في بداياته و ربما غيرها من العملات التي حصل عليها لاحقا بشكل او باخر. لذلك ذهب الكثيرون للقول ان ظهوره لن يكون له تأثيرا كبيرا.

صدقت أخي وهذه أحد جوانب جمال وقوة البيتكوين وجاذبية شخصية ساتوشي الذي تحول إلى أيقونة العصر الحديث لأنه لم يوجد حسب علمي على مر التاريخ رجل استطاع أن يقدم للعالم مثل هذا الاختراع المبهر ثم يختفي عن الأضواء ويتخلى عن كل شيء لتحقيق حلمه

هذا بالفعل لايوجد نظيره في التاريخ أن اختراع ما يكون لامركزي بشكل كامل حتى أن مخترعه لايملكه أو يملك السيطرة عليه، البيتكوين يعتبر ملك البشرية جمعاء وليس ملك ساتوشي أو أي شخص آخر، هذا مذهل حقا وبقدر ما يظهر عظمة البيتكوين يظهر أيضا عظمة ساتوشي الذي اخترع هذا الاختراع المذهل ثم تخلى عن كل شيء واختفى ببساطة.