Correct me if I am wrong, but to my simplest understanding, I think this game you are talking about have exactly same concept with Crash which we all know is a casino game that is often about airplane taking off and crashing at some point, and the only duty of the gambler is  to set the desired cashout multiplier and stake money on the game before the plan takes off..
While the plan is yet to reach your desired set multiplier and also has not crash, you have the option of cashing out at any other multipliers already achieved while the plan is still flying and yet to reach the multiplier you yourself set.

Many other casinos have rebuilt this game turning the airplane to a car or a bus, or even a human being racing or running on a very busy road with possibilities of getting hit by a car or motorbike and several other obstacles, this is a classic game concept that is truly legendary.

There are so many games that are currently been hosted on casino and most of the games is just funny too. I think with the way you are explaining it, it's like having same similar principles with most of the crash games too like flying of plane and the rest of them. Slot games are just purely based on luck which makes it less stressful too to play and also easier to lose lots of funds that's if you don't have control anyways.

Yeah that's exactly what I meant, i wasn't active to respond but thanks for helping me out. So you mean anyone can cheat or attempt scam just cause they're using a non kyc casino that shouldn't ask for their personal details when they do so?
 Don't you think it's their lose since they could be queried by regulatory bodies if anyone can use their sites or apps for things like money laundering or even try to open multiple accounts which violates their TOS?

What I have understood over time with football game fixtures is that, no tournament will fix two clubs if they know that the other has no capacity to beat the one, there is no sure game anywhere as long as football is concerned, let not confuse ourselves. However, we may know likely which clubs can win, which is still under probability until the end of the game so following odds may be a risky thing to do at that point.

So if you Z_MBFM think football is predictable then you will still believe in what's called sure bets which is totally out of this world to believe such pre determined bet exists most especially in international tournaments.

   261. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   262. 396526: ezeminer (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   263. 397737: hilariousetc (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   264. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   265. 401014: Ultegra134 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1023 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   266. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1314 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   267. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (84 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   268. 405709: ds06 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   269. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   270. 407892: micromen (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   271. 409704: Acura3600 (Trust:  neutral) (285 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   272. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   273. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   274. 430390: psycodad (Trust:  neutral) (2316 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   275. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   276. 454323: Raimonn (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   277. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   278. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3902 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   279. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   280. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   281. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   282. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +64 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   283. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (477 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   284. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +33 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   285. 529564: hymperion (Trust:  neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   286. 532686: nimogsm (Trust:  neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   287. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (6156 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   288. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1021 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   289. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   290. 543626: jackg (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   291. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   292. 545598: Isildur (official) (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (87 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   293. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1017 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   294. 551460: swogerino (Trust:  neutral) (260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   295. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust:  neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   296. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +5 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   297. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust:  neutral) (692 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   298. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   299. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust:  neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   300. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   301. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5024 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   302. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   303. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   304. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   305. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   306. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   307. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   308. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (2056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   309. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   310. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   311. 751988: Taskford (Trust:  neutral) (523 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   312. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (543 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   313. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: #  +14 / =2 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   314. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust:  neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   315. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   316. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   317. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (784 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   318. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   319. 815246: Murat (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   320. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   321. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   322. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   323. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   324. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   325. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   326. 843320: Komosa (Trust:  neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   327. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   328. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   329. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   330. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   331. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   332. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust:  neutral) (2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   333. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +133 / =4 / -0) (6576 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   334. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust:  neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   335. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   336. 885934: SamReomo (Trust:  neutral) (567 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   337. 886369: michellee (Trust:  neutral) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   338. 886521: mk4 (Trust:  neutral) (3646 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   339. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   340. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   341. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   342. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   343. 900408: spirits (Trust:  neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   344. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   345. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +36 / =1 / -0) (3576 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   346. 910236: Woodie (Trust:  neutral) (859 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   347. 911663: sompitonov (Trust:  neutral) (1214 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   348. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   349. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   350. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   351. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (422 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   352. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3391 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   353. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust:  neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   354. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   355. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2022 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   356. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   357. 941129: goodpunt (Trust:  neutral) (84 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   358. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   359. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   360. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1146 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   361. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   362. 961708: dittoup (Trust:  neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   363. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1078 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   364. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   365. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1380 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   366. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   367. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (1355 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   368. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   369. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3244 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   370. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   371. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3230 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   372. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   373. 1015954: aundroid (Trust:  neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   374. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   375. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (1836 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   376. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   377. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   378. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5152 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   379. 1029297: desertboy10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   380. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   381. 1046135: AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (469 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   382. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

The refund from Betpanda has been made and I received the funds even though I had to wait more than 24 hours, it doesn't matter what is important is that the funds are back.
But I have yet to get a definitive answer as to why my deposits are always not credited, and to date there is no satisfactory answer either from Support@Betpanda.com.

Strangely this is the opposite of me... I got the $25 bitcointalk bonus after completing 1x wager and then made a withdrawal and it was instant, while my deposit was interrupted as described above.


All solved...
But I will try depositing with other altcoins and want to know if my deposit still experiences the same thing or different from USDT-BSC deposits.

قد أكون مخطئا لكن لا أعتقد أن استخدامهم لنفس العنوان في مشكل كبير، خاصة في هذا الوقت مع وجود شركات مثل Arkham intelligence, ChainAnalysis, Elliptic, الخ.

لأنه حتى مع المنصات المركزية، أين يتم اعطائك عنوان واحد (أو أكثر من واحد)، الأموال التي ترسلها، لا يتم ابقائها في ذلك العنوان بل يتم ارساله الى hot الخاصة بالمنصة (و التي تكون عبارة عن عنوان معلوم لجميع الشركات المذكورة أعلاه).

يعني سواء استخدمت Thorchain أو Binance، من المرجح أن أي شركة تريد تتبع تحركاتك سوف تعلم أنك قد أرسلت أموالك لأحدى هذه المنصات.

على أي حال سواء كان هنالك اختلاط مع عناوين 'قامت بمعاملات غير قانونية' أم لا، قد يكون من الأفضل عدم ارسال أموال من  الثورشين مباشرة الى المنصات المركزية لأن بعضها قد يعتبر أي منصة لا تقوم بتوثيق الحسابات أو ال KYT ك high risk سواء كانت مركزية أو لا.

It seems he sent it to the correct address since, according to him, the casino acknowledged it and said they would process a refund. Otherwise, they would’ve just told him he used the wrong address or the wrong network and that the deposit couldn’t be credited.

You're correct football can be predictable but it's not a guarantee that your prediction will always play out. I feel like football predictions most of the times is based on luck that it plays out and then together with your prediction skills and stats.
Most times when you want to predict a game that has to do with a strong team and a big team just like you said the odds are always  favour the stronger team but it's not a guarantee that the stronger team will win as most of the times it's usually the other way round.

[quote author=khaled0111 link=topic=5575900
نقاط الضعف التي لاحظتها هي قلة عدد العملات المدعومة و على الاغلب هذا عائد لعوائق تقنية. اضافة لذلك، لاحظت عند محاولة تبديل البيتكوين بعملة اخرى فان عنوان الايداع الذي تعطيه المنصة هو عنوان مستعمل و قد استقبل عدد كبير من المعاملات. البعض قد يعتبر هذا نقطة سلبية خاصة بالنسبة لمن يهتمون بخصوصيتهم و لا يرغبون ان ترتبط عناوينهم بعناوين اخرى.
[/quote]

هذه نقطة غاية في الاهمية و لا تدعم ايضا مبدأ الخدمة في الحفاظ على الخصوصية بما انها لا تطلب توثيق هوية از اي بيانات خاصة يمكن استخدامها للتتبع. اعادة استخدام نفس العنوان مع اكثر من عرض تبادل يظهر من ناحية جانب عدم الاحترافية التقنية، و يظهر من جانب اخر عدم حماية الخصوصية لان ترابط العناوين يمكن ان يثبت ان الشخص قد استخدم منصة خدمات معينة بكل التفاصيل الاخرى المبينة في بيانات المعاملة.

شكرا جزيلا اخواني الكرام على تقديم المعلومة بشكل ادق وافصل، الامر الذي لفت انتباهي هي نقطة رجل اعمال اسرائيلي لدي علاقات سابقة مع حكومة نتنياهو وهو الامر الذي سيبعد بشكل كبير اذا لم نقل كلي استثمارات الفلسطينيين في هذه العملة او ثقتهم، ربما كان من الافضل التخلي على الجانب الفلسطيني من الاول وتوظيف العملة مباشرة لمصالح الاحتلال، لاني لا ارى اي فائدة من سيطرة جهة واحدة على مركزية عملة كان من الاجدر ان تكون بطابع لا مركزي

رغم ان الجانب العربي والفلسطيني لا يزال في حالة تاخر عندما يعني الامر البلوك شين والتقنيات الخاصة بالعملات المشفرة وما ذلك، لكننا بعد كل التجارب والاخبار التي نسمعها في المجال، صرنا نعرف جيدا كيف يمكن لاي جهة ان تقوم بالسيطرة على عملة مركزية وتتبع تعاملات المستخدمين وانا ارى ان خلف هذا المشروع شيئا مظلما ولا نفع للمواطن الفلسطيني البسيط ولا حتى اقتصادهم للاسف

حسب المصدر فان رجل الاعمل الاسرائيلي ليران تانكمان هو من يعمل على انجاح الفكرة و السعي لملائمة الظروف لانجاحها. جدير بالذكر ان هذا الرجل هو كان سابقا ذو رتبة عالية في جيش الدفاع الاسرائيلي و له ارتباطات وثيقة بحكومة ناتانياهو الحالية. نفس المصدر اشار الى انه سيتم توكيل مهمة التنظيم و الاطلاق لشركات فلسطينية و خليجية مختصة في المجال و هنا بالذات لا اعرف ما المقصود بشركات فلسطينية لانه على حد علمي ليس هناك شركات فلسطينية تعنل في مجال التكنولوجيا على هذا القدر من الكفاءة في ما يخص البلوكشين و العملات المشفرة، اما الشركات الخليجية فمن المرجح ان تكون دولة الامارات هي من ستكون ضمن الدول المشرفة من خلال شركاتها.

بالنسبة لتحديد قيمة العملة و عدد الوحدات و كل التفاصيل التنظيمية فانه لا اخبار دقيقة الى حد الان و عدى عن هذا المقال فانه فقط يتم تداول الخبر اعلاميا و ليس هناك اي مصادر موثوقة تنشر تفاصيل اضافية.

I now see it from another perspective now, but even if we should agree that borrowing money is not necessarily a sign of gambling addiction we should also note that gambling addiction can also lead you to borrowing for gambling. 
Yeah I also agree with you when you say there is no such game as sure game because even the surest of the games can still cause your los so why will one think that there is such as a sure game. Gambling to me I feel it's just luck and a bit of skills.

The time has come for another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time for January 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja BitList

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during January 2026

During the last month, 13925 posts were written across local boards, which is a very small decerase compared to December's number (13997). The top 5 is almost the same as month before, with only Pilipinas and German boards changing the positions, while the same thing can be said for the bottom, with Greek board being an exception.

---

Active members per local board during January 2026

During January, 1392 members wrote at least one post, which is a drop compared to December, during which 1441 members were active. Majority of this decrease is caused by Russian and Indonesian local boards, while some like Nigerian keep growing month after month.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during January 2026

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Polish local board is the leader with 57%, while at the same time Nigerian local has only 15% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket, Indonesian is the leader with 50%, while Greek local didn't have such members at all.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Greek board dominates with 57%, while Romanian and French locals both had only 11%.

---

Merit shared per local board during January 2026

During January, 9717 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, which is a big increase compared to December's 7657 merit. Majority of the local boards had the increase, but majority of it happened on German local that went from only 423 merit sent in December to 1592 in January.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during Janaury 2026

The average merit per post across all local boards that are part of this overview is 0.7, and if I remember correctly it may be the highest average ever.

I didn't think that I will ever say this, but I think that forum at the moment may be over merited. Some parts of the forum and some local boards are imho still undermited, but generally speaking, I am no sure that this is in the best interest of the forum as it may attract account farmers.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during January 2026

In January, 633 members sent while 725 received merit, which is a big increase compared to December (527 senders and 628 receivers). Once again, majority of this happened due Nigerian board, that had their all time high numbers of merit system participants.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during January 2026

I decided to make this chart again as this time I am using numbers from BitList which I hope calculate percentage of merited posts differently from Merit Dashboard. Situation is at it was in the past-Romanian board at the top with a very high 67% of merited posts, while French at the bottom with only 6%.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during January 2026

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards.

---

The most active members per local board during January 2026

And for the end of the overview, list of the most active local boards members. joker_josue from Portuguese bioard is back at the top with 144 posts, klarki from Russian ia at the 2nd with 137 posts while Turkish member mandown, who wrote 135 posts, is at the 3rd spot. Gj guys!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [137]	|	1. MaxMueller [87]	|	1. mandown [135]	|	1. Paolo.Demidov [59]	|	1. joker_josue [144]	|	1. famososMuertos [41]	|
2. jokers10 [121]	|	2. Soonandwaite [75]	|	2. yenerbatmaz [70]	|	2. gbianchi [49]	|	2. sabotag3x [79]	|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [31]	|
3. Julien_Olynpic [96]	|	3. MinoRaiola [51]	|	3. execijutiere [67]	|	3. babo [40]	|	3. bitmover [54]	|	3. Porfirii [27]	|
4. safar1980 [91]	|	4. Unknown01 [48]	|	4. Valcendier [65]	|	4. arulbero [30]	|	4. criptoevangelista [45]	|	4. danadc [18]	|
5. zasad@ [87]	|	5. Real-Duke [47]	|	5. ajanwalker [56]	|	5. fillippone [30]	|	5. TryNinja [43]	|	5. darxiaomi [13]	|
6. mak013 [62]	|	6. mole0815 [46]	|	6. Phoenix Anka [56]	|	6. Ale88 [24]	|	6. alegotardo [40]	|	6. Crystal-Trade.org [13]	|
7. Alex077 [57]	|	7. Koal-84 [44]	|	7. kriminall [55]	|	7. bitbollo [20]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [39]	|	7. Mateomateomateo [13]	|
8. internetional [49]	|	8. cygan [35]	|	8. Hvdv [54]	|	8. *Ace* [20]	|	8. Pumared [27]	|	8. Hispo [11]	|
9. PerfectumR [47]	|	9. virginorange [33]	|	9. lodocus [52]	|	9. Italian Panic [19]	|	9. mikel_012 [26]	|	9. darbitmobilerecovery [11]	|
10. KTChampions [44]	|	10. willi9974 [30]	|	10. blomen [51]	|	10. Lillominato89 [13]	|	10. davipinheiro [22]	|	10. LucasSilverGold [9]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [93]	|	1. patrickus [17]	|	1. GreatArkansas [31]	|	1. slackovic [45]	|	1. Floxynice [92]	|	1. yhiaali3 [29]	|
2. AakZaki [35]	|	2. winspiral [14]	|	2. tech30338 [28]	|	2. katanic97 [38]	|	2. Jubilee58 [92]	|	2. Kavelj22 [29]	|
3. Husna QA [32]	|	3. Danydee [9]	|	3. arwin100 [26]	|	3. Pmalek [20]	|	3. Karl_3000 [72]	|	3. khaled0111 [26]	|
4. mu_enrico [30]	|	4. fpelu [7]	|	4. julerz12 [25]	|	4. examplens [19]	|	4. Bishop Victor [55]	|	4. OmegaStarScream [12]	|
5. iqbal26 [27]	|	5. Saint-loup [4]	|	5. cryptoaddictchie [25]	|	5. ovcijisir [16]	|	5. Africolo [53]	|	5. ZaynOsmanAli [10]	|
6. Luzin [25]	|	6. Becassine [4]	|	6. coin-investor [24]	|	6. cryptofrka [16]	|	6. PremiumcryptoHub [45]	|	6. AnwarKhattabAnwar [9]	|
7. taufik123 [22]	|	7. TryNinja [3]	|	7. lionheart78 [23]	|	7. Daniel91 [15]	|	7. Yablee0 [42]	|	7. HasanIbnSaud [7]	|
8. MAAManda [21]	|	8. Rocou [2]	|	8. aioc [22]	|	8. Trofo [15]	|	8. LOVER BOY 422 [42]	|	8. Abdullah6969 [7]	|
9. abhiseshakana [19]	|	9. Halab [2]	|	9. bhadz [20]	|	9. Rikafip [15]	|	9. Charles-Tim [41]	|	9. GxSTxV [5]	|
10. joniboini [15]	|	10. GrosWesh [2]	|	10. blockman [20]	|	10. dkbit98 [9]	|	10. SatoPrincess [40]	|	10. RedFlix [4]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [11]	|	1. vivekdhyani1 [36]	|	1. cryptosize [50]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [13]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [67]	|	1. Bd officer [18]	|
2. pawel7777 [3]	|	2. JSRAW [33]	|	2. alani123 [38]	|	2. NeuroticFish [9]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [39]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [12]	|
3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [27]	|	3. BlackHatCoiner [35]	|	3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Jaweria parveen [32]	|	3. BlackHatSojib [11]	|
4. EXMON [1]	|	4. pawanjain [22]	|	4. Ultegra134 [15]	|	4. Aetherischain [3]	|	4. HustleZ [28]	|	4. Crypto Library [9]	|
5. fillippone [1]	|	5. Maestrobigbrock777 [9]	|	5. apogio [1]	|	5. bogdy23 [2]	|	5. MusaPk [26]	|	5. Z_MBFM [9]	|
6. lukaszstepnowski [1]	|	6. TheUltraElite [6]	|	6. mastercryptogr [1]	|	6. antonpans [1]	|	6. ZAINmalik75 [24]	|	6. Mahiyammahi [4]	|
7. ABCKrypto [1]	|	7. David_Surfgate [6]	|	7. bettyparker098 [1]	|	7. jedaite [1]	|	7. Rustam Meraj [17]	|	7. Review Master [3]	|
	|	8. winspiral [5]	|		|	8. antimonycoin [1]	|	8. Compromise me [16]	|	8. Btcloop [2]	|
	|	9. Vihaanraviii [5]	|		|	9. Nepemate [1]	|	9. Sabih7 [16]	|	9. Comando65 [2]	|
	|	10. LucyFurr [3]	|		|		|	10. ThemePen [16]	|	10. Nadifa2030 [2]	|

I do get the point.


This is not a matter of interpretation:


That is false. As false as 2+2=5. You "interpretation" doesn't change that.


It is false. The fact that you and they don't understand the concepts and choose to relativize them doesn't change the facts. If a game has an RTP of 98% (or an HE of 2%, which is the same thing) and you win 10X on the first spin, if you say you've obtained a 1,000% "short-term RTP", you're talking nonsense.

I agree. It is best to use 2FA or the usual username and password. Besides, safety doesn't stop there. It also depends on how we take care of it.

Besides, I don't hear about hacked gambling accounts (or I just missed it). If we are not holding money with them, there is nothing to worry about. What we are worried about is that after our deposit, the casino will be gone. That even the craziest thing happened.

Guys, @Eternad, @stadus, @dimonstration, @khaled0111, @Woodie, thank you for the congratulations and kind words! You know, I've learned with age that quite often a personal achievement you are very excited about may look not so exciting to others. That's why I feel so happy when my excitement is shared.m Thankls again, guys. Answering your question about how many tries it took to get 633x, I’d say — a lot. I didn’t count, but I can tell you it was approximately 400 tries — maybe even more. Doing that many tries in one sitting isn’t fun, so to keep it fun and easy, I did 40–80 tries per day, and it took me several days to get that 633x. ... When I saw that the next jump would give me 2,743x, I thought, "Humans aren’t wired for that much patience. The next step is simply impossible to win!" But a couple of days passed, and I decided to try my luck with this game again. I knew it might take thousands of tries, so I thought, maybe I’ll finally get there by summer. But fate had other plans, as they say. Within the first 50-60 tries I hit it.




Now I think the next step, with a 16,460x multiplier, is really impossible. But maybe some of you will surprise me. You never know what awaits you in the next 100 tries.

Yes. I know.
They didn't get much. The system flagged his withdrawal, yet I was lazy to check carefully before releasing the first withdrawal. Then I released the 2nd withdrawal without a check. Once he requested the 3rd withdrawal, I noticed that something is wrong. However, that wasn't much to be honest.

---

That is some good suggestions! I will implement the changes tonight. About the abuser, we do not have many users as you may know. We just launched two weeks ago and the platform is still in Beta. The guy actually threatened us of giving negative review on Bitcointalk forum. This happened the next day of our announcement thread launch.

Exposing these abusers would be good, so everyone can red tag them 'til kingdom come. But, won't that only cause more problems for Blocino? That practically violates the user's privacy. They even stated on their own Privacy Policy page that they can't disclose any personal data to any third party unless required by law.
Doing so might also deter future possible gamblers from using this casino especially those who are keen on keeping their personal data private.

You don't get the point.

When @khaled0111 writes his post, I can go about it in two ways. Either I hammer him for not using the correct terminology, or I can try to understand what he is trying to convey. He may use wrong terminology, but I don't feel particularly incentivized to lecture him about something that I could interpret as being false (like you) or see the point he is making.


It is not false what he is saying. Whether he should be using "actual" vs. "theoretical" or whatever, sample size is all that matters in the context that @khaled0111 is talking about


and you won't change that.

No, I'm not losing myself in anything. The concepts of HE and RTP are very clear, and this forum is full of people who have some idea of the concepts but don't understand them. Several of them have been quoted in this thread.


Great way to talk nonsense. Shall I explain it to you like you're a primary school kid? I'll repeat it again: RTP and HE are two concepts that basically express the same thing in different ways, and talking about short-term RTP is nonsense because RTP refers to large statistical samples something that neither you nor khaled0111 nor leea-1334 are going to change, no matter how much you want to twist and turn the issue.

You are frequently losing yourself in semantics, but it is ok. At least there is some hope that you do understand the concept of sample size in statistics, not mathematics:


whereas your "short-term" here undoubtedly refers to a low number of events (aka small sample size).


lol

Nice wall of text but I don't know why you are quoting me because that has nothing to do with what I am saying. RTP and HE are two ways of expressing the same. They are mathematically interchangeable; if a game has a HE of 2%, it is because the RTP is 98%, and vice versa. So leea-1334 si simply wrong.


So, what @khaled0111 wrongly labels as "short-term RTP" would be more accurately described as short-term results, not "short-term RTP".

Sometimes we have to think around the corners in order to get to the same result we want.

Thanks for khaled for finding a solution

Good suggestion and interestingly it worked. I didn't expect it would. CTRL+F is a keyboard shortcut to the browser's in-built search feature. In case of Chrome, they call it "Find & Edit." They basically achieve the same thing, but the issue here was that Toshi.bet assigned that keyboard shortcut to their own search option. However, the browser's find feature can still be activated in a different way.

Thanks!

In any probabilistic environment, sample size does matter. In mathematics, it is about certainty and rigorous proofs. Mathematics are deterministic, law of nature.

Statistics are probabilistic and empirical and you actually often times approximate results via sample size. You have a whole different toolset to evaluate outcomes (CI, RA, mean, median, SD...)

So sample size does matter individually, but the question asked here (I guess) is whether the collective RTP is 100% (in a large sample size, which I assume is approximately given if Duel has a lot of users). If they have a ton of players, Duel should hand as much money out as they are cashing in from players over time.
 
I can't say for sure, but maybe the word "actual" that @leea-1334 used, was to imply that for an individual, the 100% RTP rate is rather irrelevant unless that individual plays enormous volumes distributed among a very large number of events (dice rolls, slot rounds etc.).


What @khaled0111 labels as "short-term RTP" is most likely referring to a small sample size because sample size clearly matters. The larger the sample size, the closer the relationship between average payout and average wager, aka 100% RTP convergence.

In a probabilistic environment, which I think a casino is (it is not mathematical), a 100% RTP essentially means a redistribution of funds among players following a stochastic process.

He is wrong. RTP and HE are two sides of the same coin. It doesn't matter the sample size.


False.


False as well. Unless you want to play on words here. If the RTP is 98%, it doesn't matter if you get 300% or -50% in the short term. RTP is a mathematical concept, and what you call short-term RTP results have nothing to do with the mathematical concept.

I have played on blocino, I think their original games are very light and easy to use. I use my phone to play, and it works fine. Pretty impressive


Well, that's probably what happened. Furthermore, the OP used a code to claim the test bonus, allowing anyone to share it and abuse it. It would be better if the test bonus for Bitcointalk members was credited directly to their accounts to prevent abuse.

1. Bitcointalk is probably the first place they announced their casino, which is still in beta phase
2. Bitcointalk is probably the only place where they provided some members with bonus codes for testing the platform
3. The abusers knowing how popular bitcointalk is decided to threaten OP that they would post a scam accusation if their accounts stayed blocked.

No prob, you were only trying to help a member.
Regarding the FS, once your registration is complete and you log in, click on your profile icon, then select "Bonuses" There, you’ll find your 20 free spins, make sure to activate them because they have an expiration date (see the image please)

اكيد أخي معظم البرامج المفتوحة المصدر تعتمد على المتطوعين وخاصة بالنسبة للترجمات لكن في النهاية هي مسؤولية فريق التطوير الأساسي الذي ينبغي عليه أن يراجع الملفات قبل إضافتها للمصدر
المتطوعون لايستطيعون رفع هذه الملفات إلى المستودع ودمجها إلا عن طريق المطور الاساسي أو في حالة إعطائهم صلاحية لإجراء تغييرات في المستودع وأستبعد هنا أن يكون تم إعطائهم الصلاحية، على الأغلب المطور قام بدمج الترجمة دون مراجعة ربما لان اللغة الفرنسية أو العربية ليست لغته الأصلية لكن كان عليه على الأقل أن يتأكد من عناوين البيتكوين الموجودة في الترجمة

صحيح هذه نقطة مهمة للغاية لانه ان كان يستعمل تطبيق تطبيق الهاتف فانه من المستحيل نسخ العنوان الا اذا قام المستخدم بنقله يدويا و هو ما استبعده تماما و لكن لا احد يعلم بالضبط. كل شيء وارد بما ان الضحية مبتدأ و ليس بالدراية الكافية للتفريق بين جميع عناصر المحفظة. هذا يزيد من التأكيد على ضرورة معرفة الطريقة الصحيحة للاستخدام الامن للمحفظة

اما على تطبيق الحاسوب، و ان لم يكن قد قام بنقله يدويا في اقصى الحالات، فان هذا يفتح فرضية ان احد المطورين قد قاموا بتحوير صيغة العنوان لجعله من الممكن نسخه. يعني المطور جعل من خانة العنوان استثناء ليتمكن الضحية من نسخه. هذا سينفي التهمة بالمطلق عن الجهة المسؤولة عن الترجمة الفرنسية و يحيل المسؤولية الى فريق التطوير نفسه اي انه عمل داخلي inside job.

A gambler can have a edge over games that are skill based but it can be very different for one to have an edge over games that are luck based. This can be a difficult thing and this is what most casinos use to make profits from gamblers.

Since we can not control luck, it is the casinos that can at least control how gamblers win on their platforms reducing the possibility of users making too much profits by reducing the odds of the games, making themselves quite fortunate.

If one is going to use a centralized exchange, they already know that they have to pass KYC in the exchange. I don't know if op has funds in his exchange account, but what this case actually proves is that people should not store their funds in custodial services and they should be their bank.

If you lose your wallet file or you device, what you'd simply do in a self custodial setup is to revover your wallet with your seed phrase. However, if it's in a custodial service, your fate rests in their hands and i don't like that.

I do not think that it is possible to predict your luck. Your are lucky or not. But you can not be lucky always and you can win for some time and one day you will lose all your money.

في الموضوع الخاص بالكشف عن مستحدمي الذكاء الاصطناعي في قسم Reputation ليس هناك سوى المنشورات الانقليزية. حسب ما فهمت فان هناك مواضيع مشابهة في الاقسام باللغات الاخرى. بما انه لا يوجد هذا الموضوع هنا قلت يمكنني دعم مجهود المشرف باستخدام report to moderator و هو سيتصرف التصرف الصحيح. انا اكتفي برفع التقرير كل ما اشتبهت باحدى المنشورات خصوصا الاعضاء الغير النشيطين دوما انا لا اشك ابدا بمنشوراتهم.

اتفهم كذلك ملاحظتك ان هناك من يريد ان يقول شيئا و لا يملك الكفاءة بالعربية. هذا طبيعي و مفهوم اذا كان بوستات لها اهمية. حتى لو تم رفع تقرير فان المشرف لن يتخذ اي اجراء. انا لن اضع تقييم على حساب اي عضو حتى لو ثبت انه يستعمل AI. اعتقد ان هذا ليس دوري ان اشوه سمعة احد لانه ربما يتغير في المستقبل.

No KYC is NO KYC 


Thanks for pointing that out. Actually, we started with ETH only and later added other cryptocurrencies. We overlooked that part. However, we already updated it.

It is correct, actually. We do accept XRP deposits on the BSC chain.


Please PM us your username.
It's No KYC casino.


Correct. The slots are in Demo Mode and cannot be played with real money. We will mention it on the website.
About BLC token, it is staked automatically on the dividend pool and the players get dividend every 24 hours based on their BLC holdings. The TestCoin is for our Staffs only to test the games since we are still in Beta. We created TestCoin so the staffs can play the games to test them, and these testcoin wager won't count towards the wagering contests. We did it to make the wager contest fair for the players.

---

It seems we got some exploiters from BitcoinTalk forum, who managed to exploit some bugs and used it in a few games. They successfully withdrawn some money already, and after blocking their account, they are threatening us to give negative review on the forum. We expect them to come here and write more details about it.

---

Speaking of exploits, we will open a bug bounty program soon and we will reward if anyone can report security issues of the games. Feel free to reach us via private message if you are interested.

Pretty much. We can only play with demo credits and not real money.

Personally, I don't think it's a good idea to display the slots when they are in such state—demo mode only. Because some folks may thought it's working as usual and depo, only to find out they can't play the slots at all with real money. It can be a real hassle. We all know casinos typically have wager req for real money as well and/or sensitive when players depo and withdraw with little to no play.

If the team wants to do some tests, they can keep it in the staging environment, and on the live public website, they can simply add coming soon in the slots.