khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Anyways, one thing is to steal money and disappear, another different thing is to psychologically damage people as they are doing, it just shows how wicked and sick in the head some scammers can be when comes to getting as much money as possible and mock their victims.

That’s exactly what I have been thinking about.
They pulled an exit scam and are unlikely to ever get back online or return users’ money, so why do they waste their time posting those updates and give false hope to victims.

I think it's mental problems or drugs. There are physical sadists who enjoy ripping the legs off flies or generally causing pain to others, and there are psychological sadists who do things like this and then enjoy watching their work with satisfaction.

That is something I have noticed from scammers who manage to get their way and steal money or when they believe they are about to get a lot of money from a single victim, they actually get cocky and show some sadistic and psychopathic characteristics against their victims.
It is because they feel entitled to the money of others, as it was their own money.

At this point, I believe it would be very safe to assume those scammers behind this theft are just trying to mock us all and perhaps they could be even trying to turn this situation in their favor in order to continue stealing money with their next fake casino.

This experience has made me skeptic of any new casi o which appears here and claims to be free of Know your client.

261. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
262. 396526: ezeminer (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
263. 397737: hilariousetc (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
264. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
265. 401014: Ultegra134 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1013 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
266. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
267. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (84 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
268. 405709: ds06 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
269. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
270. 407892: micromen (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
271. 409704: Acura3600 (Trust: neutral) (285 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
272. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
273. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
274. 430390: psycodad (Trust: neutral) (2311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
275. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
276. 454323: Raimonn (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
277. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3902 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +64 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (474 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +33 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (6129 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1020 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 543626: jackg (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 545598: Isildur (official) (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (87 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1017 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust: neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +5 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (692 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5024 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (2056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 751988: Taskford (Trust: neutral) (516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: # +14 / =2 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (784 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 815246: Murat (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1955 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +133 / =4 / -0) (6569 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (565 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 886369: michellee (Trust: neutral) (405 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3646 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 900408: spirits (Trust: neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +36 / =1 / -0) (3565 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 910236: Woodie (Trust: neutral) (856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1207 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (421 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3385 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
353. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
354. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
355. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2016 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
356. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
357. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: neutral) (78 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
358. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
359. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
360. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
361. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
362. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
363. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
364. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
365. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1379 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
366. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (722 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1355 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3217 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3225 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (1832 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 1029297: desertboy10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 20, 2026, 10:36:42 PM

What I found a bit odd, though, is that although this is a crypto wallet, they do not accept crypto payments! You have to pay with your credit card.

If I'm not mistaken, that's because Google play mandates that anyone accepting payments for digital content or subscriptions must use Google Play Billing. If they don't do that, they won't be able to get listed on the app store.

@sunsilk You should be able to get access to the premium version for free, if you download it through F-droid.

Quote from: Woodie on February 20, 2026, 10:24:34 AM

Btw, not sure how true it is, but I hear it's easy to win at slots when the game has just been listed (new).. and this would be the perfect time for everyone to put this theory to the test...For science Grin

I play games because I want to explore games that are new with me or when I want to have entertainment. I don't play games because of any theory or fallacy of big winning chance, it's untrue. At all casinos, they run business for profit, and gamblers have to be aware of this fact, so there is no easy chance of winning especially winning big and more importantly winning against the casino in long term.

I don't take risk to test any theory or fallacy as I value safety of my fund than chance of beating a casino, or using any playing theory well for profit.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 20, 2026, 11:40:41 PM

Many gamblers believe the same, but this is not true, obviously. It’s just another gambler’s fallacy.
Whether the game is new or has been around for a too long does not change anything. This doesn’t affect the chances of winning in any way. What really matters is the game’s RTP and volatility.
But why not? There’s nothing wrong with trying to test this theory (as the occasion arose) as long as you enjoy playing those new games and not spending on it more than you can afford to lose

There is nothing wrong to test a new game, test a new theory, but let's do it with money people afford to lose, and surely with very tiny part of their gambling fund and never let it affects their whole gambling fund as well as general finance.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 20, 2026, 11:59:34 PM

Quote from: Hispo on February 20, 2026, 11:47:31 PM

Anyways, one thing is to steal money and disappear, another different thing is to psychologically damage people as they are doing, it just shows how wicked and sick in the head some scammers can be when comes to getting as much money as possible and mock their victims.

That’s exactly what I have been thinking about.
They pulled an exit scam and are unlikely to ever get back online or return users’ money, so why do they waste their time posting those updates and give false hope to victims.

I think it's mental problems or drugs. There are physical sadists who enjoy ripping the legs off flies or generally causing pain to others, and there are psychological sadists who do things like this and then enjoy watching their work with satisfaction.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:36:42 PM

Quote from: sunsilk on Today at 09:36:20 PM

Is this premium paid? I can't paid the details on the website.

Yes, that’s what Premium means. You need to pay a fee to get access to the wallet’s advanced features.
I just downloaded it to check how much it costs and it seems they offer two subscription plans, a monthly plan that costs $25 per month and a yearly plan that costs $199 per year.

What I mean is I can't see the paid details. Cheesy

And thanks because I haven't downloaded it yet so, it shows after downloading and installing it. There's so much savings if it's annually paid, hmmm.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:36:42 PM

What I found a bit odd, though, is that although this is a crypto wallet, they do not accept crypto payments! You have to pay with your credit card.

Haha, they should start accepting payments in crypto since they're a multi crypto wallet.

Again, thanks khaled for those details.

Quote from: CONVOAI on February 15, 2026, 07:43:47 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:10:27 PM

May I ask all the gamblers on this board and I hope they will respond honestly: "how many times do you check whether the license of the casino you are playing at is valid?".
Pretty sure the answers will 99% "we never do".
So, any casino could simply claim they are licensed and many gamblers will take their word for it wihout verification. This is, unfortunately, how things have been going around here for too long.

Even if they are licensed, is it possible to understand their intentions? If they entered the field with the intention of scamming, then what if they have a license or not? Suppose Betmoco has a valid license, then what would be the next step for those who are now unable to withdraw large amounts? Would those who gave the license to Betmoco refund the gamblers' money? Would they help at all?

Obtaining a valid license means that the license issuers knows everything about the casino and the team behind, and that every detail is clear including procedures to take in case of proved scam. Otherwise, the license issuer is also considered as contributor in scam.

Just today I discovered the updates with betmoco. The case reminds me about a similar case happened since few months called betmanor. I guess many of you guys remember this casino and how he had started promotion with a huge welcome bonus with a very small wager requirement, which was the main reason why few people join the casino and made deposits. Later the representative tried to give promises that he will fix all disputes as a try to clean hos trust page but never solved a single case.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:50:28 PM

مهما كانت ثقتك في خبرة مطوري اي محفظة و في كفاءتهم، لا يجب الوثوق في حماية المحفظة بشكل اعمى. لا بد من اتباع قواعد الامان المتعارف عليها و الحذر الدائم. اضافة لذلك، يجب تعلم اساسيات التقنية التي تستعملها و اخذ فكرة جيدة عن طريقة استعمال التطبيق الذي تنوي استخدامه، واعتقد ان هذا امر بديهي.
مثلا، في الحالة التي تم الاشارة، لو كان الضحية يعلم كيفية استخدام المحفظة لما ارتكب ذلك الخطأ و نسخ عنوان المتحيل بدل عنوانه الخاص.

انا لا انزه المستخدم بأي حال من الأحوال خصوصا انني وجدت صعوبة في استيعاب كيف وصل الى ذلك العنوان الذي كان مختبئه في التفضيلات و بالذات النسخة الفرنسية. هذا مذهل بصراحة. لكن تأويلات الحادث وخيمة ان يكون هناك اهمال بما يسمح بادخال بيانات لا تتمكن برمجات الحماية من رصدها حتى لو كانت بدون فاعلية. صاحب ذلك العنوان كائنا من يكون قد نجح فعلا في كسب بعض الاموال ليست على ملكه و تسبب هذا بتراجع ثقتنا كمستخدمين في التطبيق و في خدماته و حتى في فريق العمل خلفه.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:50:28 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on February 17, 2026, 08:58:23 PM

بالرغم من عدم رصد اي حادثة خطيرة لدى مستعملي الكتروم فانه يوصى بتوخي الحذر الشديد خصوصا اذا كنت تستعمل الكتروم للتخزين البارد بمساعدة سيرفير خاص.

بالنسبة لهذه النقطة، اردت فقط الاشارة انه لا حاجة لاستخدام سيرفرك الخاص او اي سيرفر عند استخدام محفظة اكتروم للتخزين البارد، لانه بمجرد ربط المحفظة باي سيرفر فلن تعود محفظة تخزين بارد (لا يجب ان يكون هناك اي اتصال بالانترنات او باي شبكة خارجية).

ما اقصده هو انه لاستعمال الكتروم للتخزين البارد فانت لست بحاجة اصلا للاتصال بالانترنت. لكن اخذت بعين الاعتبار وقت تقرير انفاق تلك المدخرات كليا او جزئيا فانه افضل ان يكون باستخدام سيرفير خاص حفاظا على الخصوصية و توفيرا لشروط حماية اكثر امانا.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 11, 2026, 11:52:44 PM

بالفعل، اي شخص مهتم بالخصوصية عليه تشغيل عقدته الخاصة و ايصال محفظته بها.
لا يمكن ان تعلم ما هي البيانات التي يمكن ان تجمعها العقد الاخرى التي تتصل بها لذلك يفضل دائما استعمال vpn لاضافة مزيد من الخصوصبة، لكن يبقى دائما الحل الافضل تسغيل عقدتك الخاصة.

بعد الحادثة الاخيرة مع محفظة الكتروم النسخة الفرنسية، اصبحت اشك في كل ما كنت اعتقد انه على كفاءة و جودة خدمات عالية. و بالرغم من عدم رصد اي حادثة خطيرة لدى مستعملي الكتروم فانه يوصى بتوخي الحذر الشديد خصوصا اذا كنت تستعمل الكتروم للتخزين البارد بمساعدة سيرفير خاص. اذا كان يتعذر على اي شخص الخوض في تفاصيل تقنية او ملاحظات الاخلالات المحتملة فانه من الافضل التواصل بالسؤال و النقاش مع مختصين قادرين على تقديم الافادة.

هذه بعض الروابط المفيدة لمستخدمي الكتروم:

Quote from: Cryptmuster on Today at 09:16:27 AM

Quote from: GODENKOR on February 16, 2026, 07:55:01 PM

Why is your title "no KYC" a lie? Why doesn't the administration remove these pathetic, aggressive marketing campaigns? It's terrible. Bitcointalk is simply a gathering place for scammers to collect people's data.

https://snipboard.io/hqIVY1.jpg

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 08:59:21 PM

^^
Sorry, but did you read the email they have sent to you carefully? They clearly said that they need to verify your identity because the sportsbook provider flagged your betting behaviour as suspicious. So, the decision to verify your account was made by the sportsbook and not the casino and the casino has no option but to comply with this request.
Pretty sure there are many gamblers who have played at this casino and were never requested to verify their identities.

I haven’t encountered a request for mandatory verification at this casino, but that was before they opened their sports betting section.
First of all, I think that before making a deposit, you should always carefully read the terms and conditions, they usually specify whether verification is mandatory. Nowadays, I believe almost any casino can request verification from you at some point. In that case, it becomes a matter of choice: decide what’s more important to you, completing the verification and continuing to play, or refusing if you’re not comfortable with it.

Did they explain in the email what exactly they consider suspicious behavior and how they justify it? I think that if such a requirement is imposed, there should be a clear explanation behind it.

I wrote to their online support that I refuse to undergo identity verification and request my deposit back, but they refused.
https://snipboard.io/G7nY5s.jpg

Quote from: GODENKOR on February 16, 2026, 07:55:01 PM

Why is your title "no KYC" a lie? Why doesn't the administration remove these pathetic, aggressive marketing campaigns? It's terrible. Bitcointalk is simply a gathering place for scammers to collect people's data.

https://snipboard.io/hqIVY1.jpg

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 08:59:21 PM

^^
Sorry, but did you read the email they have sent to you carefully? They clearly said that they need to verify your identity because the sportsbook provider flagged your betting behaviour as suspicious. So, the decision to verify your account was made by the sportsbook and not the casino and the casino has no option but to comply with this request.
Pretty sure there are many gamblers who have played at this casino and were never requested to verify their identities.

I haven’t encountered a request for mandatory verification at this casino, but that was before they opened their sports betting section.
First of all, I think that before making a deposit, you should always carefully read the terms and conditions, they usually specify whether verification is mandatory. Nowadays, I believe almost any casino can request verification from you at some point. In that case, it becomes a matter of choice: decide what’s more important to you, completing the verification and continuing to play, or refusing if you’re not comfortable with it.

Did they explain in the email what exactly they consider suspicious behavior and how they justify it? I think that if such a requirement is imposed, there should be a clear explanation behind it.

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on February 16, 2026, 11:34:24 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 10:32:40 PM

^^
No, I won’t do that.
Try to educate yourself more about how casinos operate and how they work with sportsbook providers before making baseless accusations. Then you can come back and tell me what I should do.
The casino took the decision to verify your account because the odds provider flagged it. It’s as simple as that /.

They won't tell you the real situation and they just want to pressure the casino to process the withdrawal. I've heard how the mafia works, when they get information about a match then they will place small bets in many Sportsbooks to avoid attention from casinos/sportsbooks meaning winning $100-200 still doesn't exclude anything from cheating. Some people have confirmed here, they withdrew more than $100 without any problem without KYC well this is another proof that the case arose based on reports from sportsbook providers not based on winning.

What mafia? Stop using drugs. Syndicates bet at reliable companies, not cheap casinos like this one, where you can't trace the owner or even check if their license is legitimate. You haven't heard enough to write such nonsense. Well, their sign needs to be removed, it's misleading people.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 11:59:00 PM

Quote from: Slow death on February 16, 2026, 04:10:35 PM

Welcome to the forum! Your casino has a very nice design, but from what I'm seeing, it only has one game. I don't know how that would be a good thing in terms of attracting many customers. Since it's very difficult to have thousands of people who like only one game, and since people like many games, most casinos have opted to offer many games and even sports betting. This way they please many customers. In any case, congratulations on your casino!

Sorry for being too honest, but I really don’t see how anyone can say this casino has a "very nice design". Maybe it’s just my poor taste, but to each their own, after all!

Note: regardless of how good their design may look, I do not recommend anyone to play here until they address the concerns I have raised regarding their provably fair system!

The provably fair concerns raised here are valid. That should be the most important thing for any casino. The design is up to personal taste, but with only one game and no clear fair system it's hard for players to trust this casino.

I also noticed that the OP is not really active here. It looks like they're just watching without replying to the questions from users in this thread. The issues raised here are serious and the OP should speak up and explain how their provably fair system works. If players can't verify that the games are fair, why would they play? Hope they respond soon.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 08:21:58 PM

Quote from: doggywin on February 16, 2026, 06:22:42 PM

Was I supposed to save hash after every single dice bet? After every single roll? Are they for real? Is it made inconvenient intentionally?

What is the point of having a nonce in dice provably fair if it is always 0?

Did I lose my money fairly?

Unfortunately, yes. If you want to verify the fairness of the bets, you need to save the hash of the server seed, the client seed and the nonce for every bet.
If the server seed changes with every bet, this means that with every new bet you are starting a new session, so it makes perfect sense that the nonce resets to zero. This is how the nonce is supposed to work. I’m not sure what you are trying to complain about here because everything seems to be working as it’s supposed to.

This is how nonce is supposed to work? Have you played dice anywhere or are you spamming your signature?

In every casino that has nonce, the rolls are generated like this:
server seed, client seed, nonce: 0
server seed, client seed, nonce: 1
server seed, client seed, nonce: 2
server seed, client seed, nonce: 3

Players save the server seed once and verify any number of rolls together. This is legit provably fair.

BetPanda is using nonce suspiciously. They don't want players to verify every bet? What the heck is this?

Hey khaled0111,

Thanks for reporting this and sorry about the interruption. On the night of February 16th we were doing a system upgrade (rolling out updates to our Dice game and caching system), and during that process there was a brief period where all games went down — including the slots. This was a server-side issue on our end, not a problem with the slot game itself.

The issue has been fully resolved. If you refresh the page now everything should work normally. Slot games will resume from where you left off if there's an active session, but in this case the session was interrupted by the server restart so it wouldn't have saved your state — that's the expected behavior during a deployment, not a bug with the game.

If your $5 bonus balance was affected by the crash, reach out to us and we'll make it right.

We're still in early stages and actively improving things every day. Appreciate your patience and the feedback.

– CSN STARS

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 11:33:10 PM

شكرا على التنبيه اخي DireWolfM14.

من عيوني

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 11:33:10 PM

لغتك العربية لا بأس بها و مفهومة جدا، رغم كونها بلكنة معينة

نعم, لهجت الفلسطيني الامريكي Cheesy

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 11:33:10 PM

و اتمنى ان يزداد نشاطك في القسم العربي كما وعدتني سابقا

انشأالله

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 16, 2026, 11:33:10 PM

بالنسبة للتنبيه الذي نشرته فبالفعل، ما حدث لا يبدو امرا جيدا و اعتقد انه يمكن حتى وصفه بالثغرة او الضعف الامني.
كنت على علم بما حدث و كيف قام ذلك الشخص بتحويل مبلغ معين لعنوان المخرب و قمت بتفقد عديد الملفات المترجمة لعديد اللغات و اخر ما خطر في بالي هو تفقد ملف اللغة العربية و الا لكنت تفطنت ان كان هناك اي تلاعب. هذا تقصير مني و اعتذر عليه.

ما اعتقد الحرامي يقدر يسرق فلوسنا
بس عنوان الحرامي يبين في مكان مو طبيعي

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:32:40 PM

^^
No, I won’t do that.
Try to educate yourself more about how casinos operate and how they work with sportsbook providers before making baseless accusations. Then you can come back and tell me what I should do.
The casino took the decision to verify your account because the odds provider flagged it. It’s as simple as that /.

They won't tell you the real situation and they just want to pressure the casino to process the withdrawal. I've heard how the mafia works, when they get information about a match then they will place small bets in many Sportsbooks to avoid attention from casinos/sportsbooks meaning winning $100-200 still doesn't exclude anything from cheating. Some people have confirmed here, they withdrew more than $100 without any problem without KYC well this is another proof that the case arose based on reports from sportsbook providers not based on winning.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:21 PM

^^
Sorry, but did you read the email they have sent to you carefully? They clearly said that they need to verify your identity because the sportsbook provider flagged your betting behaviour as suspicious. So, the decision to verify your account was made by the sportsbook and not the casino and the casino has no option but to comply with this request.
Pretty sure there are many gamblers who have played at this casino and were never requested to verify their identities.

You can keep your guesses to yourself; we only need facts. I won $110, and it's unlikely the provider would ask for identification, not the casino's. It would have been foolish to provide such reckless information. The casino leases this provider, that's all. The decision on verification always comes from the casino itself, meaning it collects information about players, which completely contradicts their claims. This is clearly aggressive marketing to attract players. I would block such casinos outright. Apparently, the site administration doesn't care what the casinos write when they're trying to attract a flood of players.

Quote from: ultrloa on Today at 11:10:00 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 15, 2026, 10:59:24 PM

Quote from: gunhell16 on February 12, 2026, 05:26:57 AM

That's a valid point, man. While some people may completely disagree with your post, others may understand what you're expressing. However, you make a valid point. You're right; if you're going to deposit anyhow, it's best to keep your first wagering money separate and remove as soon as you've saved up, say, $100 in profits.

Keeping in your account balance only the money you already have planned to spend on gambling and withdrawing the excess, is not only a good idea but also an essentiel part of proper budget management.
Some casinos offer a vault feature which helps you achieve the same goal since it allows you to keep the excess in a vault (lock it) so you don’t spend it and the advantage of this feature is that also helps you save on withdrawal fees (keep in mind that keeping your coins in a custodial wallet for a long period is not recommended!).

Yeah its good decision to do, since they can avoid losing a lot of money if they could just do those actions what you have said, also it can limit their long time exposure on gambling if they just manage the amount and limit to what they can afford to lose.

Also this casino they actually offer Vault feature to use by their gamblers, but I don't know if there's people here using that feature. Since for me its better to deposit only the amount you can afford to lose on your account to avoid getting any extended troubles.

It's true, and a lot of our fellow gamblers are always reminding us of that. We should only wager the amount we can afford to lose, and that is actually how things should be.
The players will undoubtedly suffer long-term consequences if we play for any other reason.

Additionally, it's simply different when we store our assets even if they're modest in non-custodial wallets. Compared to custodial platforms, where we might lose our equilibrium
at any time, at least we can claim that we actually have control over it.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 15, 2026, 09:59:38 PM

Quote from: Wiwo on February 13, 2026, 09:32:28 PM

You are referring to Toshi Bet or another casino, you mentioned duel, if you mean duelbits then I will tell you that that casino have food reputation here in the forum and a few times that I use them, I never encountered any problems either and sure I believe others don't have any issues with them.

Since he shared his experience here in this thread then he must be talking about Toshi.bet. He mentioned Duel just to compare how different his experience was, although I don’t think it’s in good taste to mention a company name in another company's announcement thread (it’s just me, though).
Regarding bets not showing in the “bets history”, personally, I don’t consider it a big issue as long as it doesn’t have any impact on your balance. But I’m happy to hear the issue got resolved with the new update.

When ever balance is not displaying it is assumed to be bug. Hence when an update is done everything functions normal again.
Concerning about mentioning other site on this thread well to be frank, I don't see it as something wrong because already their signature is displaying on that same thread immediately they leave post over there, so, it is not a big deal if they mention other site on their thread.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 15, 2026, 10:59:24 PM

Quote from: gunhell16 on February 12, 2026, 05:26:57 AM

That's a valid point, man. While some people may completely disagree with your post, others may understand what you're expressing. However, you make a valid point. You're right; if you're going to deposit anyhow, it's best to keep your first wagering money separate and remove as soon as you've saved up, say, $100 in profits.

Keeping in your account balance only the money you already have planned to spend on gambling and withdrawing the excess, is not only a good idea but also an essentiel part of proper budget management.
Some casinos offer a vault feature which helps you achieve the same goal since it allows you to keep the excess in a vault (lock it) so you don’t spend it and the advantage of this feature is that also helps you save on withdrawal fees (keep in mind that keeping your coins in a custodial wallet for a long period is not recommended!).

Yeah its good decision to do, since they can avoid losing a lot of money if they could just do those actions what you have said, also it can limit their long time exposure on gambling if they just manage the amount and limit to what they can afford to lose.

Also this casino they actually offer Vault feature to use by their gamblers, but I don't know if there's people here using that feature. Since for me its better to deposit only the amount you can afford to lose on your account to avoid getting any extended troubles.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 15, 2026, 11:58:45 PM

I can also see that a $5 (no deposit bonus) has been instantly credited to my account upon registration. Without éforcing kyc or ày serious and advanced verification measures to spot and identify multi-accounters, I'm afraid this bonus will be massively abused by cheaters. This may cause serious issues later ans you will have hard time dealing with it, just like what happened with some of your competitors. I hope his won’t happen here, though

I haven't registered yet, but I guess it's manually added then. By the way, can you check their language section?

They support a total of 23 languages, but when you try changing them, the site slows down for some strange reason (at least it did for me). I cannot determine whether it's because of my internet speed or it has like that always. Not only that, it's also showing partially translated pages, like this ones below. I mean what's the point then if it's incomplete. Undecided

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:59:10 PM

Sorry, but it would have been better if you have took the time to explain to him the difference between a provably fair game and a game with zero house edge.

What would have been better is that instead of coming here to try to lecture me on what I should or shouldn't do, you would have taken the time to explain to him yourself what you say I have to explain to him. Wasting time explaining something obvious to someone who doesn't even reach a 0.3 merit to activity ratio isn't my thing.

I don't think it's a coincidence that those of you who come to this thread to raise doubts about whether Duel is provably fair or not, or to try to lecture others, are people who are promoting other casinos.

If anyone wants to cast doubt on whether Duel is provably fair, all they have to do is prove it. If they don't know how to check, there's this thing called the internet, search engines, and another thing called AI. I'm not a kindergarten teacher who has to explain obvious things. And the same goes for 0% HE. If anyone wants to cast doubt on whether the games that Duel promotes as 0% HE actually are not, what they have to do is provide evidence.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:10:27 PM

May I ask all the gamblers on this board and I hope they will respond honestly: "how many times do you check whether the license of the casino you are playing at is valid?".
Pretty sure the answers will 99% "we never do".
So, any casino could simply claim they are licensed and many gamblers will take their word for it wihout verification. This is, unfortunately, how things have been going around here for too long.

Even if they are licensed, is it possible to understand their intentions? If they entered the field with the intention of scamming, then what if they have a license or not? Suppose Betmoco has a valid license, then what would be the next step for those who are now unable to withdraw large amounts? Would those who gave the license to Betmoco refund the gamblers' money? Would they help at all?

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:10:27 PM

May I ask all the gamblers on this board and I hope they will respond honestly: "how many times do you check whether the license of the casino you are playing at is valid?".
Pretty sure the answers will 99% "we never do".
So, any casino could simply claim they are licensed and many gamblers will take their word for it wihout verification. This is, unfortunately, how things have been going around here for too long.

I want to be honest here. I did actually check the license for this casino(Curaçao) when they announced that they got it since I was thinking of playing here. Used chatgpt, gemini, claude and grok to check whether it was a legitimate license or not.

Was busy back then which is why I ran it through AI. All except gemini confirmed that it is valid. Gemini mentioned that there is something shady about it. Majority said it was fine and AI make mistakes sometimes which is why I ignored Gemini when reverse was the truth.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:10:27 PM

Quote from: arwin100 on February 14, 2026, 10:44:54 PM

Yeah this is the least thing people could look for and also verify if the license presented is valid, since early exit might not gonna happen. But still I doubt it can stop those scam, since if the intention of the casino is to do that heinous act well even if they have license they can still run and scam people.

May I ask all the gamblers on this board and I hope they will respond honestly: "how many times do you check whether the license of the casino you are playing at is valid?".
Pretty sure the answers will 99% "we never do".
So, any casino could simply claim they are licensed and many gamblers will take their word for it wihout verification. This is, unfortunately, how things have been going around here for too long.

Honestly, I have never checked whether a casino license was true or just a falsehood. That is mostly because I have mostly stuck to very reliable and big casinos which would have no need to falsify their license or do such fishy things.

Perhaps people should have not blindly trusted whatever Betmoco ended up saying about their licensing and take all their claims with a huge grain of salt...

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:10:27 PM

May I ask all the gamblers on this board and I hope they will respond honestly: "how many times do you check whether the license of the casino you are playing at is valid?".
Pretty sure the answers will 99% "we never do".
So, any casino could simply claim they are licensed and many gamblers will take their word for it wihout verification. This is, unfortunately, how things have been going around here for too long.

For sites that have a clickable badge, it only takes a second to verify whether they have a valid license. Some years ago, there was license issuers that didn’t have an online validator and I didn’t always take the time to do research unless I heard complaints about that casino. Today almost every casino, except those based in Costa Rica, have a verifiable badge at the bottom of their homepage.

I didn’t follow the Betmoco situation too closely. My understanding was that they were operating unlicensed, so there wan’t really anything to verify. They dismissed some claims about their previous license, which was from Curacao and then said they were in the process of getting a license from Anjouan. They never made enough of an impression to make me want to play there and after seeing how they addressed licensing concerns and accusations of unprocessed withdrawals, I got the feeling there were out to scam.

Quote from: khaled0111 on February 14, 2026, 11:10:27 PM

Quote from: arwin100 on February 14, 2026, 10:44:54 PM

Yeah this is the least thing people could look for and also verify if the license presented is valid, since early exit might not gonna happen. But still I doubt it can stop those scam, since if the intention of the casino is to do that heinous act well even if they have license they can still run and scam people.

May I ask all the gamblers on this board and I hope they will respond honestly: "how many times do you check whether the license of the casino you are playing at is valid?".
Pretty sure the answers will 99% "we never do".
So, any casino could simply claim they are licensed and many gamblers will take their word for it wihout verification. This is, unfortunately, how things have been going around here for too long.

I personally have never checked a license validity before playing at a casino, but I also rarely play at non trusted casinos when they 1st launch. I want them to have some sort of reputation before I put my money at risk as we have seen too many fly by night scam operations pop up to take the risk.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:31:13 PM

Welcome to Bitcointalk, Rollify!
I’m really interested in reading a review from someone who has made a deposit and actually used the platform and was able to withdraw his winnings.

There is one from a reputed member, see:

Quote from: Mahdirakib on February 10, 2026, 04:41:40 PM

Welcome to Bitcointalk forum. Usually I wait for a few weeks before making deposits to a new casino which comes to this forum. But I have made a deposit at Rollify after my first visit. Looks like there is a well experienced team behind Rollify. It has everything to compete with the other casinos of the crypto gambling industry. The sportsbook is missing at this moment though.

The rakeback rate is low at the beginning stage. But the bonuses from Rollbox are good enough. I have made some small deposits and a withdrawal, everything went smoothly. My first withdrawal was under review for 5 minutes before the funds were sent to my wallet.

I think I will depo with a small amount soon, too. I wanna try my luck here for my next gamba sesh. Small depo = small risk for me.

I'm also interested in their 150x challenges as I usually see higher multi to hit. I'm not gonna relentlessly chase it lol, but it's a might as well since I do check out new releases, and rollify seem to list these games for this. At the moment, challenges for the slots I wanna try with have been claimed lol, as expected.

color=gray] 277.[/color] 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3902 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +64 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (474 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +33 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (6120 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1019 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 543626: jackg (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 545598: Isildur (official) (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (87 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1013 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust: neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +6 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (692 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5024 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (2046 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 740502: condoras (Trust: +11 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 751988: Taskford (Trust: neutral) (515 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: # +15 / =2 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (784 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 815246: Murat (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1954 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +133 / =4 / -0) (6564 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (565 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 886369: michellee (Trust: neutral) (404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3646 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 900408: spirits (Trust: neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +38 / =1 / -0) (3565 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 910236: Woodie (Trust: neutral) (856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1207 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (420 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3380 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
353. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
354. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1993 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
355. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1042 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
356. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: neutral) (74 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
357. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
358. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
359. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1132 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
360. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
361. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
362. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
363. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
364. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (1378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
365. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (714 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
366. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1355 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3220 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (1831 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5141 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 1029297: desertboy10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 1046135: AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (469 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (5132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
383. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2610 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
384. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4377 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
385. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
386. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
387. 1071136: PHI1618 (Trust: # +2 / =2 / -0) (1234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
388. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +20 / =8 / -1) (2229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
389. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
390. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
391. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
392. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
393. 1105709: spider703 (Trust: neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
394. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
395. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
396. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust: neutral) (2842 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
397. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
398. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)