TBH, I just go through Op profile and check his activities and I must say it's not pleasing because he is not always active and neither does he post regularly. About the project well I wouldn't find it interesting to join or do anything there as whatever that concerns telegram already has a red flag from my side as most of them do ends in wasted efforts. Of course you are right most of the tap to earn or move to earn are just like this and after they have finished gaining popularity they ended up breaking people's heart for those who fully put their trust on those projects. Again, I wouldn't mind saying that this project is own by op but he is hind under radar so that wouldn't put himself at the front rather using a trickish way to post here maybe he wouldn't want to be tag for anything in the future.

All the "support offers" I got were sent in dm, not one was made public. I won't delete the post because the answers I got from other members were pretty useful and can help someone who is in same situation as me.


That was exactly my intention, every report we make is one step closer to some unsuspecting victim being saved. Scams like this are painting Bitcoin in wrong light.

---

BTW. recently I watched interesting documentary about how scams like this actually operate. I was surprised at the level of organisation they have.

Inside A Merciless Scam Empire (short documentary)

Well, a lot of gamblers may join a new platform where they never played before, only to avail offers and bonuses, but that does not mean that those gamblers would go away once the promotion is over. Actually, it depends upon the services they got during the promotion period. If the casino had good customer support, the games were fair, and the interface was attractive, some of the gamblers may even stay after the bonus period is over.

Additionally, the casino offers promotions with the intention of attracting gamblers to their platform and then retaining them. For this, they may keep offering something and keep the gamblers engaged.

The intention of these promotions is to expose the other services of the casino and their services in general to the community that have been lured with specially tailored promotions. On exposure to how efficient the services of the casino are, many of them who actually know the value of good service will stick around long after the promotions have even ended. Those who do not stay probably are not meant to stay.

The promotions bring exposure to the platform.

With the actions of the YEET team, they are doing a good job.

Yes, and there are still those players who are slots and sports bettors who move their bankroll to the bookmaker and regardless of the competition, they continue betting there and getting the odds or participating in exclusive slots.

Some competition can really make people keep visiting the platform every day. Specially if the reward is good, and accessible by frequent players.

It becomes like those games where you have daily activities. Once it gets into your routine, people just keep playing...

I think it has more benefits than drawbacks. This is because it builds customer loyalty, and depending on the type of bettor, they will stay with the bookmaker because they like the odds or the VIP. I don't think most would change because of the competition.

yes, but at the same time it's a double edged sword strategy, because as soon as they stop those promotions, a lot of players would leave as they are not there for what the casino has to offers overall, they are only there for the wagering leaderboard and the contests.
and you can already see this if you compare the numbers of the first leaderboard and the current one.

The big reason for this is because of how engaging they can be. Gamblers will not even know when they are becoming loyal customers because these promotional strategy will have them always wanting to come back to the platform.

For a casino to have a special contest tailored specifically for members of the community amongst the numerous numbers of gamblers worldwide, it's a gesture that many gamblers in that community will appreciate.

It shows that the casino values the inputs of the community and holds them in special regard.

That’s a perfect point, and we completely agree that having a mobile app makes the whole experience better.
We’re glad to share that Jackbit already offers a mobile app for players who prefer to enjoy our platform on the go. 📱

You can find the download and step-by-step installation guide here:
👉 https://jackbit.com/en/static/app

The app provides the same features as the website, with added convenience and speed 🚀

But sometimes it also "depends" because if it gives the players a sort of edge, the casino would be losing money. Plus they would be losing money exponentially if one user has ten accounts.

 

It already happened in BlackJack.Fun when they had their community-friendly daily/weekly/monthly wagering contests. Users were happy to win back some of their losses after the prizes were given, plus they were given a generous amount if free spins in Dig Dig Digger. The admins were OK with losing a little amount of money because the casino was growing.

But when a large group of people arrived, they definitely had multi-accounts, and exploited BlackJack.Fun's generosity because the casino lost millions from their wagering contests.

Someone said that he/she believes that the group was a team of professional exploiters from Asia.

It is true that such contest or bonus offer always have imparts on the community that is was specifically made for, such forster the communication relationship amongst both the casino and the players justa s you have said. This is very strategic in business because it helps to grow a casino and sometimes, gamblers who visits the casino for the first time and as a result of the fair treatment meted on them and other good experience they had with the casino, they might decide to remain with the casino and not go away and some would go as far as referring friends and relatives to the casino and that is home the traffic of the casino keeps growing.

Better still if it has a mobile app.

I still keep asking myself my most crypto casinos do not have mobile apps as compared to their crypto exchange counterparts despite all of them being in the same industry and some making nice revenue out of it.

To me, an app makes the whole experience of playing games easier and less like to get log in details phished. For example, I don't remember the last time I visited an exchange site on my mobile browsers, despite most of them being optimized for mobile phones too. I always visit and use the mobile apps.

What I think about this is a simple compliance with our central bank. That's because whichever TXID you enter on it, they'll just accept it even if it's not from the actual TX that you've received. I cannot say if there's someone who actually monitors the TXs there unless they will start to enforce stricter rules about it.

But yes, I won't provide fake information on it because they're now tied up with the government and any info that's sensitive, it's important for them to have it processed and next might be the taxation for each user they have if the government forces it. And what we don't like about them is whenever we're in a surge, they start to maintenance all of a sudden.

That is true and there are people who doesn't like sitting for longer time because of waist and difficulty to seat down for a longer duration, people like that needs what wouldn't make them relaxed on their bed while accessing the site.
Anyway, sorry for the back pain, it would be better you have good treatment and go for regular checkup to know how the condition is.

Right? I can't even think how luck is not supposed to be involve on such unpredicted game, any game. As long as there is a referee or judges of the game, the result will not always be so predictable, luck still matters.

You can only experienced the said issue when you are using smartphone to access the site, but when using pc like I does currently I didn't experienced what you made mentioned but rather just on web version of it because I am using pc to access the site.
I think for better experience I would advise you to use pc to access the site than mobile phone, although not everyone who must access the site with pc but to me I enjoys gambling with pc than mobile since the screen isn't that widely for me covering the whole places I wouldn't find it interest.

Time has come for yet another brief monthly overview, and this time a little bit earlier than usual as I am travelling tomorrow and won't be too active till Sunday. All charts and tables are made using Ddmrddmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space while images are uploaded via TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk made by @joker_josue.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but I included them anyway, hoping that theymos will finally give them their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during July 2025

During July, 13735 posts were written across local boards which is a solid increase compared to June (12762). Nigerian board not only kept the first spot they took from Russian board, but even increased the difference reaching their all time high of 3430 posts, while all the other boards afe far behind top two.

Regarding the boards that had decreased activity, French sticks out as their post number dropped by 50%, making it all time low (at leasts since I am making these overviews).

---

Active members per local board during July 2025

During the above mentioned period, 1348 members frote at least 1 post in one of the local borads, which is a big increase compared to June (1191). Majorify of this increase goes to Nigerian and Russian local boards, but other big boards contributed to that as well.

Also, its worth mentioning that Nigerian board is coming dangerously close to Russians and might overtake them in this metric as well.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during July 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Greek board is the leader with 71%, while in the same bracket Pakistan had only 11 % of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket, Bengali is at the top with 52% of such members, while Croatian local board had only 14% of members who wrote that amount of posts.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Pakistan leads with 53% while at the same time French local; board had only 8% of such members.

---

Merit shared per local board during July 2025

During July 8367 merit was sent across local boards that are part of this overview, which is surprisngly lower than during June (8710), despite two most merited boards having increased amount of merit shared. This decrease happened simply bnecause German board went from 1603 merit shared in june to only 604 in July, casuing this dump.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during July 2025

During July, average merit per post ratio across local boards was 0.61 which is a drop compared to June (0.68). No surprise there since number of post went up while merit went down.

While in june 4 local boards had over 1 merit/post ratio, this time only Spanish local boartd managed to reach that.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during July 2025

During July 534 members sent while 641 rereived merit on one of the local boards which is surprisingly an increased compared to June (529 senders/613 reicevers). I say surprisngly since merit shared went down noticeable, but maybe the fact that majorioty of that decrease happened on 1 board didn't affect the total numbers.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during July 2025

Once again Romanian local bpoard is at the top, but this time with a little bit more realistic 55% of merited posts (compared to June's 73%).

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during July 2025

And last in this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habits in local boards, which you can see differentiate quite a bit.

---

The most active members per local board during July 2025

And in the end, list of the most acrive members per local board. joker_josue from Portuguese local board is once again at the top with 168 posts, while two members from Russian board ( Julien_Olynpic with 158 and klarki with 155 posts) are 2nd and 3rd. GG guys!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Julien_Olynpic [158]	|	1. Lakai01 [118]	|	1. mandown [103]	|	1. Ale88 [80]	|	1. joker_josue [168]	|	1. famososMuertos [80]	|
2. klarki [155]	|	2. MaxMueller [105]	|	2. execijutiere [75]	|	2. xenomorfo [64]	|	2. bitmover [117]	|	2. darxiaomi [77]	|
3. jokers10 [124]	|	3. Soonandwaite [69]	|	3. Mustang Shelby [61]	|	3. giorgione [63]	|	3. sabotag3x [94]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [50]	|
4. zasad@ [100]	|	4. Koal-84 [60]	|	4. Wake Up [56]	|	4. babo [57]	|	4. TryNinja [89]	|	4. Hispo [37]	|
5. Numeral [93]	|	5. MinoRaiola [60]	|	5. ajanwalker [50]	|	5. verdinio [51]	|	5. alegotardo [78]	|	5. Porfirii [30]	|
6. xandry [91]	|	6. mole0815 [56]	|	6. blomen [49]	|	6. cande86 [50]	|	6. mikel_012 [46]	|	6. danadc [22]	|
7. safar1980 [76]	|	7. willi9974 [53]	|	7. Balmain [48]	|	7. fillippone [50]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [42]	|	7. MJWALK [12]	|
8. Alex077 [63]	|	8. Real-Duke [48]	|	8. Silence Scream [47]	|	8. *Ace* [49]	|	8. alexrossi [25]	|	8. MaksymMur [12]	|
9. Polkeins [59]	|	9. cygan [45]	|	9. W Jr. [47]	|	9. Plutosky [40]	|	9. l3pox [25]	|	9. Filicius [10]	|
10. Etranger [51]	|	10. Unknown01 [44]	|	10. Black Mbaye [44]	|	10. Lillominato89 [39]	|	10. criptoevangelista [24]	|	10. Pinkman737 [8]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [50]	|	1. Danydee [11]	|	1. Peanutswar [45]	|	1. katanic97 [43]	|	1. Charles-Tim [98]	|	1. Kavelj22 [36]	|
2. mu_enrico [33]	|	2. G.Seed [10]	|	2. blockman [42]	|	2. ovcijisir [43]	|	2. Yablee0 [58]	|	2. khaled0111 [29]	|
3. Luzin [28]	|	3. Becassine [9]	|	3. gunhell16 [41]	|	3. Pmalek [37]	|	3. Tonimez [45]	|	3. yhiaali3 [28]	|
4. joniboini [26]	|	4. patrickus [9]	|	4. cryptoaddictchie [32]	|	4. slackovic [37]	|	4. WhoYouCantKill [45]	|	4. GxSTxV [16]	|
5. maydna [23]	|	5. MJWALK [8]	|	5. GreatArkansas [30]	|	5. Rikafip [29]	|	5. Africolo [40]	|	5. loveurself420 [16]	|
6. armanda90 [21]	|	6. LeGaulois [7]	|	6. Eternad [26]	|	6. dkbit98 [27]	|	6. Floxynice [39]	|	6. MJWALK [13]	|
7. punk.zink [19]	|	7. Jer0mFR [5]	|	7. happybitcoinph [26]	|	7. examplens [22]	|	7. Tungbulu [38]	|	7. albon [12]	|
8. reagansimms [19]	|	8. Deelan1 [4]	|	8. arwin100 [25]	|	8. Trofo [16]	|	8. JayJuanGee [34]	|	8. Sebastian Michaelis [5]	|
9. silpersurfer [17]	|	9. Halab [4]	|	9. bhadz [25]	|	9. btcltcdigger [13]	|	9. Mate2237 [34]	|	9. OmegaStarScream [4]	|
10. masulum [16]	|	10. GrosWesh [3]	|	10. Fredomago [24]	|	10. BitGoba [10]	|	10. Fiatless [32]	|	10. hugeblack [4]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [15]	|	1. JSRAW [26]	|	1. condoras [19]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [21]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [64]	|	1. Crypto Library [18]	|
2. pawel7777 [8]	|	2. Bitcoin Smith [20]	|	2. Ultegra134 [18]	|	2. MJWALK [5]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [40]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [17]	|
3. MJWALK [2]	|	3. pawanjain [18]	|	3. CHSUP [1]	|	3. NeuroticFish [4]	|	3. Cheema02 [28]	|	3. Mahiyammahi [17]	|
4. TryNinja [2]	|	4. IIrik11 [16]	|	4. Dimitris [1]	|	4. TryNinja [2]	|	4. ZAINmalik75 [28]	|	4. Bd officer [13]	|
5. stwenhao [2]	|	5. TheUltraElite [12]	|	5. MJWALK [1]	|	5. @Whale [1]	|	5. MusaPk [25]	|	5. Z_MBFM [10]	|
6. CHSUP [1]	|	6. LucyFurr [8]	|	6. alani123 [1]	|	6. CHSUP [1]	|	6. BTC FutureKing [22]	|	6. Nothingtodo [9]	|
7. EXMON [1]	|	7. libert19 [8]	|	7. changlee [1]	|	7. Trêvoid [1]	|	7. Zaka1221 [21]	|	7. Review Master [7]	|
8. GazetaBitcoin [1]	|	8. avikz [6]	|		|	8. killat [1]	|	8. GbitG [20]	|	8. LDL [6]	|
9. TooBit.com [1]	|	9. GrennEC [5]	|		|		|	9. UmerIdrees [19]	|	9. Shishir99 [6]	|
10. Trêvoid [1]	|	10. mardo89 [4]	|		|		|	10. CryptoYar [18]	|	10. Wonder Work [5]	|

Yes, smart companies take advantage of negative comments to reestablish and boost the confidence that people have in them. Especially when these negative comments are false. It takes a smart team to do that, and unfortunately not all casinos have this sort of team.

 

That would be the craziest thing to do since even if they implement 100% RTP chances to lose is still there. They might just get disappointed and do a rage betting like actions and for sure they might regret doing those things especially if they lose lots of money or all capital they brought.

So we really need to control ourselves to avoid getting any more bigger problems.

And better to take everything cool and enjoy since if we are going to be lucky then for sure it happens, but if not then its fine then better luck next time to us.

Yeah, I remember that there was a lot of slot multiplier tournament before, but if I recall it correctly, it didn't get that traction in the community. I try to join some, but I wasn't that lucky to even hit like 50x in games that I played. I just got busted early, from $30-$100 as initial capital.

But I heard that there are gamblers who just spend around that ball park number and hit like in the 500x-1000x and won several slot game multiplier. So that's how it is, everyone is built differently when playing slot and other are luckier I guess.

I still play though with my favorite slot games from time to time in a control manner. Once I'm busted, it's over for me and quit and maybe start next week again or if the budget will allow me to play again.

First and foremost, we want to thank every single one of you who has taken the time to comment here:
@panjul07, @Cointxz, @beveryu778, @Wapfika, @Zwei, @haircombint, @fieberman, @The Cryptovator, @Kavelj22, @logfiles, @joeperry, @virasog, @gunhell16, @DaNNy001, @Woodie, @khaled0111 — your feedback, concerns, and even harsh words are important. They help us see things from your perspective, and they push us to improve.
We know we’ve made mistakes. We also know that the only way to rebuild trust is not through long explanations, but through action.

---

📅 Re-Opening Timeline (Confirmed)
We want to remove the uncertainty around when things will be back.
BetManor will reopen no later than Thursday, August 28, 2025.
We are working around the clock to launch earlier, but Thursday is the final guaranteed date.
When the site comes back, withdrawals are our very first priority. Making sure players are paid comes first, before new promotions or features.
This is a promise we will stand by.

---

💰 Withdrawals & Pending Requests
We want to make this part as transparent as possible.
All pending withdrawals have already been processed, except for two forum members. Those two players will be able to withdraw on reopening day.
We currently have no other pending withdrawal requests in our system.
With the reopening, proof of transactions (TXIDs) will be shared here (with user consent) so the community can see payouts confirmed in real time.
Anyone who wants to double-check their status can still reach out via support@betmanor.com or t.me/VIPBetManor.
This means there is no “backlog” waiting — just two remaining cases that will be cleared on opening day.

---

⚙️ Technical Upgrades & Fixes
Why did this happen in the first place?
Our previous wallet provider introduced restrictions that disrupted both deposits and withdrawals.
Instead of letting more players face issues, we shut down and started migrating to a stronger, more reliable wallet system.
This process has taken longer than expected, but it is now in final testing and nearly ready to go live.
We’ve also strengthened our promotion system to prevent abuse so genuine players aren’t affected by bad actors.

---

🛡 Community Concerns
We understand the criticism, the scam warnings, and the red tags. They exist for a reason: to protect the community. Our job now is to change those perceptions by following through.
@The Cryptovator and @Kavelj22 — thank you for pointing out where communication fell short. From now on, you’ll get specific dates, not vague “soon.”
@joeperry and @virasog — you’re right, reputations can be rebuilt. We’re determined to put in the work to make that happen.
@Woodie and @khaled0111 — thank you for reminding us that optimism and caution can go hand in hand. We want to earn back your cautious optimism through action.

---

📢 Next Steps
Daily updates will continue here until Thursday. Even if brief, we’ll post progress every day.
Public confirmations of payments will follow as batches are cleared.
Support response times are being reduced with an expanded team.

---

I think every casino always has its haters, those people without a job who try to deceive the casinos by making false accusations. I think we shouldn't seek attention or anything, just ignore them. It's well known that honest casinos should only act when they've truly made a mistake or something.

Casinos are constantly under attack from all sides. Each of us as players is responsible when choosing our casino of choice, and that's what matters.

When I see a slot promotion like that, I play, but I don't go crazy, sitting around like there's no tomorrow, I do it in a very controlled manner Slots can get you very excited, and when you see that, it means you've spent a lot of money. That's what you have to be careful about.

Slots aren't an ATM you still have to control yourself, even if you see the high RTP and a 0 house edge That's very tempting, but you still have to control yourself.

What browser did you use?

Out of curiosity, I did the same on Chrome browser. The initial homepage was just Google with the "Desktop Site" option even checked. The site loaded, but automatically redirected to the mobile version (m.jackbit.com)

Maybe there was just a minor mishap/glitch which got patched.

I think they should answer the scam accusations against them with proof. So that those who accused them will just go away. In real world that's how everything works, so it also applies in online. But I do understand that it's a tough business to be in, so they be ready to really answer every questions that they have in mind, with regards to how everything works including accusations that is baseless.

Talking about competition though, it could also benefit us in the long run. I mean they are going against them, and then can either go up and compete or die. But for us gamblers, the more the better options for us if new casinos will slowly built their brand here.

Actually, the casino should take advantage of these fake accusation to boost their own reputation, and ignoring these fake accusations will give them no benefits but doubt from the people reading the accusation.  By refuting this fake accusation and proving that they indeed offer a reputable service will help them establish their footing in terms of being reputable.

That went down to fast...perhaps the forum needs mods sending such service providers to the grave yard faster than they came to avoid unsuspecting players from falling for such..

And thanks for the heads-up

Someone lock this thread to send the warnings

The only reason why such authority would need his details is when an anti-money laundry (AML) detected and like I know I don't think if the said user would be using his account for illegality or for activities.
People cares about their privacy and whenever they see that their privacy isn't secured they wouldn't mind moving out to some where they think that are more secure for them to operate and gamble. Of course, this isn't in the hand of support team rather are being guided by sets of rules or regulations on the casino but it would be fine there should be a sets of adjustments where it would also favor more gamblers.

لا اعتقد ان هذا من الممكن تقنيا مع اي من  شبكات البلوكشين التي تعمل بالتعدين. السبب بسيط و هو انه ليس هناك جهة واحدة هي من تنشط بالتعدين بل يمكنك ان تحصي العديد من مزارع التعدين التابعة لشركات عملاقة، كل منها تسعى طول الوقت لتجميع اكثر ما يمكن من المعاملات في بلوك واحد لاضافته الى سلسلة الكتل. لذلك من الطبيعي ان يتم اختيار المعاملات على اساس قيمة الرسوم و ليس وفق التواتر الزمني. ربما هذا هو اكثر ما اصبح يحفز العاملين في قطاع التعدين على مواصلة العمل بعد انخفاض مكافأة البلوك مع كل هالفينغ.

حسب علمي ليس هناك اي شبكة تعتمد مبدأ الرسوم الثابتة. جميع الرسوم يتم تحديدها وفق معيار معين بحسب القيمة الاولية لسعر الوحدة حسب حجم المدخلات و المخرجات فيها. التواتر الزمني ليس حلا حتى لو تم تطبيقه لانه ليس كل المعاملات بنفس الحجم و لا كل المعاملات بنفس درجة الاولوية. هل تعرف شبكات تعتمد مبدأ الرسوم الثابتة و تأكيد معاملات وفق التواتر الزمني؟

Correct, Its a very competitive industry so I can only imagine that the competition will try and
create negative vibe around a new comer.

We are approximately only a year old at this stage so compared to the other very long running casinos
we are just starting out. Give it tme and Winna will be an established platform. it wont be long before
all this pervieved negativiy will be in the past and long forgotten.

What I mean by daily RTP is that when I play, the RTP is quite good at over 400%, but while I was playing Bonanza, it seemed like the RTP was decreasing as I kept winning. You're right that not everyone who plays the game I play wins, so it's just a matter of luck.

I usually don't think about RTP, but by chance, when I opened the casino, I accidentally saw the high percentage, so I tried it

I also opened several casinos, and Cloudflare appeared, but the waiting time depends on the network connection. On my PC, it's faster and takes 10-15 seconds to bypass Cloudflare, but on my phone, it can take up to 30 seconds to bypass Cloudflare.

---

The next match day features Fulham vs Man United and Newcastle vs Liverpool. If you have any predictions, please post them herehttps://x.com/Razedcom/status/1959465690689335768
$100 for those who can correctly predict the scores of both matches.

هذا يدفعني لسؤال قد كنت سألته في السابق في  موضوع لا أذكر هنا في القسم العربي أو في القسم الإنكليزي لكنني لم أجد إجابة شافية
وهو: لماذا لاتكون رسوم الشبكة ثابتة بحيث تكون متوسطة مناسبة للمستخدمين والمعدنين على حد سواء؟ تغير الرسوم وقت الازدحام هو ما يدفع المعدنين للطمع وأخذ المعاملات ذات الرسوم الأعلى وبالتالي التسبب في تأخر المعاملات وارتفاع الرسوم للشبكة كلها .

بينما لو كانت الرسوم ثابتة بشكل متوسط ويتم أخذ المعاملات بحسب أولويتها الزمنية أي أن يتم أخذ المعاملة الأولى ثم الثانية وهكذا بالترتيب الزمني وليس الأولوية من حيث ارتفاع الرسوم، أتوقع أنه كانت انحلت مشكلة الازدحام وارتفاع الرسوم .

كثير من الشبكات تعتمد مثل هذا المبدأ ولا نجد أنها تعاني من الازدحام مثل شبكة البيتكوين.

I have actually not come across any centralized services which includes casinos that will delete your account upon your requests and completely erase your information and data from their system.
When you request that your account be deleted and that your personal data be completely wiped off or erased from their the casinos system for life, they customer support or the management of that casino may tell you or inform you that your request has been granted and that everything about you has been erased, it's simply a lie, they tell you this to simply avoid long talks.

Just as you have right said, they will and must keep a part of the users personally information for any important use of it in the future if or when the need arises, I guess this is the reason why so many people who understand perfectly how this systems work are always afraid and or against kyc services, like casinos where kyc verification is mandatory.

حين يقوم المعدنون باختيار المعاملات الاكثر رسوما فانهم بذلك يفرضون على المستخدمين وضع اكثر عمولة ممكنة و قد رأينا ذلك في مناسبات عديدة خصوصا حين يرتفع الطلب على البيتكوين في اوقات الذروة. انا اتفق معك انهم ليسوا مسؤولين مباشرين عن تحديد نسبة العمولة كرسوم معاملات و لكن لهم تأثير لامباشر في ذلك.

Even though what happened is tragic, and I can feel how they must feel, one just can't help but wonder how a person can be in the industry for so long and still behave like a total newbie. I watched the initial few minutes of the interview, he says that he realized that the mobile app is not associated with the desktop app, which means they don't have a mobile wallet, but he came to know abou that after the case, which is so naive for him not to confirm this before importing a wallet containing almost $1m worth of Bitcoin.

The only thing that I liked in that interview was the interviewer defending Bitcoin, saying that when something like this happens, it's not that the Bitcoin network is compromised or anything like that, but it's that someone has got access to your seed phrase and your wallet, and that is not Bitcoin's fault. Those who may watch that interview, if they are newbies like this guy, shouldn't think that Bitcoin is the reason why he lost his money; they should know it was his fault that he lost all his money.

Can't they make an adjustment to this rules as I know more people wouldn't find this part interesting to continue using site, as this could be the reason for Dr. Osh account closure, but however even though he deletes his account the details still remains within the system so he it's not entirely gotten rid off from the their system.
Though most of the gambler doesn't even cared about their information being retain on some site, but those who definitely cares about privacy wouldn't be that finding it funny to leave their information behinds.

Thank you for your suggestion. I've tried sending a PM and hopefully a representative can help me.

Thank you Jackbit for responding.

Yes. In fact, on a protocol level, there are only satoshis.

Fees will be whole sats. So 14 sats fee makes it 0.099 sat/vbyte, which means nodes still reject the transaction. At 15 sats, it will be 0.106 sat/vbyte and can be broadcasted.

It's rounded. Or more accurately: the amount in sats/vbyte gets calculated from the transaction size and total fee. The fee in sat/vbyte can have as many decimals as you want, the actual fee is an integer.

Perhaps the daily or even weekly RTP can change, but theoretically, the RTP remains unchanged at 96.5% for Pragmatic Play.

Like the Starlight Princess slot, the daily and weekly RTP is currently on the rise. https://www.razed.com/casino-game/starlight-princess/
But who knows... I myself don't really think about RTP at all.

that, but they also use those hosting services like vercel.app, pages.dev, web.app, to not get blocked by filters, as those domains/services have high trust rating compared to a new domain.

or he can keep the post up as bait, so he can post those websites here so we can report them, but it's up to him.

   376. 943442: Podgor (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   377. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (1161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   378. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +15 / =4 / -0) (977 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   379. 954323: m.lov (Trust:  neutral) (332 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   380. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1188 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   381. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1001 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   382. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1981 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   383. 965120: celeborne (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   384. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1207 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   385. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (704 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   386. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (1345 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   387. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   388. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   389. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   390. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (3103 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   391. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   392. 1015954: aundroid (Trust:  neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   393. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   394. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1297 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   395. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1574 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   396. 1026500: rusbitcoinuser (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   397. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   398. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1604 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   399. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   400. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust:  neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   401. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (4921 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   402. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   403. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2709 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   404. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust:  neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   405. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   406. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   407. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   408. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   409. 1094195: igor72 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2361 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   410. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   411. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   412. 1105709: spider703 (Trust:  neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   413. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2054 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   414. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1165 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   415. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust:  neutral) (2566 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   416. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1939 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   417. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   418. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (658 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   419. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1756 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   420. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   421. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust:  neutral) (2369 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   422. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   423. 1136512: Xylber (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   424. 1137750: bavicrypto (Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (154 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   425. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust:  neutral) (2540 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   426. 1143728: Spazzer (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   427. 1153445: BitcoinBunny (Trust:  neutral) (2851 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   428. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1786 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   429. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1347 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   430. 1166480: Julien_Olynpic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4256 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   431. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   432. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +2 / =2 / -1) (2214 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   433. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (527 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   434. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1555 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   435. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (18784 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   436. 1202061: chimk (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (714 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   437. 1208052: frankbitcoin (Trust: +27 / =0 / -1) (342 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   438. 1210149: ithd1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   439. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   440. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   441. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust:  neutral) (7473 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   442. 1237522: Plutosky (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   443. 1239916: ZipReg (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (821 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   444. 1248164: fruktik (Trust:  neutral) (613 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   445. 1260847: creep_o (Trust:  neutral) (1001 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   446. 1269701: cryptoaddictchie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1462 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   447. 1275282: joniboini (Trust:  neutral) (1838 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   448. 1283017: masulum (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1649 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   449. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +54 / =0 / -0) (579 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   450. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   451. 1292764: notocactus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4590 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   452. 1297306: haloxon (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (524 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   453. 1342946: Deadrisinghelp (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   454. 1362086: conilmionome (Trust:  neutral) (1205 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   455. 1392550: zeki555 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   456. 1410401: dkbit98 (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (8180 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   457. 1422438: Paolo.Demidov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2492 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   458. 1433865: witcher_sense (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (4425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   459. 1464056: Mrstacy (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   460. 1478835: MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +56 / =0 / -0) (2816 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   461. 1541583: sky999 (Trust:  neutral) (780 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   462. 1545702: DeepMining76 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   463. 1564795: Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   464. 1573369: casperBGD (Trust:  neutral) (1152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   465. 1573409: Souri (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (360 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   466. 1574226: mu_enrico (Trust:  neutral) (2251 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   467. 1580039: asche (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1491 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   468. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (11177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   469. 1583465: Dernoste (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (149 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   470. 1593137: famososMuertos (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (3517 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   471. 1608003: montreal1 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   472. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (3164 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   473. 1644820: bitcoiner24h (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (102 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   474. 1681586: RickDeckard (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3204 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   475. 1695463: Speculatoross (Trust:  neutral) (353 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   476. 1762404: Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (962 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   477. 1775670: bubbalex (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (339 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   478. 1781771: Mbitr (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (1326 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   479. 1803753: Kylapoiss (Trust:  neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   480. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2176 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   481. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   482. 1855828: taikuri13 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1707 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   483. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (2151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   484. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (2317 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   485. 1883627: shasan (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   486. 1903411: BITCOIN4X (Trust:  neutral) (1192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   487. 1932205: CucakRowo (Trust:  neutral) (593 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   488. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   489. 2000200: 1Dq (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   490. 2003707: kawetsriyanto (Trust:  neutral) (1145 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   491. 2004043: Zwei (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   492. 2005913: Corrosive (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   493. 2033515: mikeywith (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (7018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   494. 2072197: livecoins (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   495. 2087138: Bitcasino.io Support (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (1751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

هناك موضوع للأخ Zwei مترجم عن الموضوع الأصلي للعضو LoyceV للاستفادة من انخفاض الرسوم بتقليل المدخلات في المحفظة وخاصة للذين كانوا يعملون في صنابير البيتكوين أو للمشاركين في الحملات الذين يتلقون دفعات أسبوعية وبالتالي الذين يقومون باستراتيجية التجميع على المدى البعيد سيكون لديهم عدد كبير جدا من المدخلات والمخرجات وبالتالي ستكون معاملاتهم ذات رسوم عالية.

هذا مقتبس من الموضوع يوضح الفائدة الكبيرة لدمج المدخلات الصغيرة

لذلك هذه فرصة كبيرة لمن يوجد لديه عدد كبير من المدخلات والمخرجات أن يقوم بتقليصها
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547270.0

Indeed, there are information that's beyond the reach of the service to verify. But that's probably not the point. It's probably like the system about police blotters. They're mainly gathering information for record keeping. For a time, they may amount to nothing, but a situation may arise in the future which prompts the authorities to take a look at your history. If you provided fake information, it's going to be your problem. You might suffer for it.

So, yeah, you better be honest. Such should be the mindset when dealing with a third party that has control over your funds and submits data to the authorities. Who knows, years from now, the tax people might one day appear on your doorstep to do some verification on the pieces of information you once provided in the past.

اصحاب منصات الخدمات لا يصدرون معاملات بدون احتساب قيمة الرسوم و مقارنتها بحجم المعاملات و العائدات المستفاد منها و لا اعتقد انه يمكنهم التعويل على هذه الخاصية لانه قد تؤخر تأكيد المعاملات و بالتالي قد يضر هذا بسمعة كفاءتها. كما لا اعتقد ان حجم المعاملات التي تصدرها منصات الخدمات لها وزن كبير على الشبكة بل ان اغلب التحويلا تحصل بنظام التحويل المباشر و ليس في شكل سحوبات من المنصات. عموما فتلك المنصات بكل الاحوال يمكنها اضافة هذا العرض كخيار لكن طبعا لا اعتقد ان اس من مستخدمينها سيقبل ان يصبر على احتمالية ان تتأخر السحوبات لان المنصة تود توفير بعض السنتات.

من جهة اخرى، أليست أحواض التعدين بدورها منصات خدمات هناك من يستفيدون منها؟ مع تراجع قيمة المكافأة في كل هالفينغ فان العائد من العملية كلها سينخفض تدريجيا و نلاحظ الاهمية التي اصبحت عليها رسوم المعاملات بالنسبة للمعدنين. بتخفيض نسب الرسوم بهذا القدر (من 1% الى 0.01%) و مع الهالفينغ القادم فان التعدين سيتراجع بشكل ملحوظ في نسبة العوائد الاستثمارية و التصنيف السوقي.

مبدئيا لا اعتقد انها فكرة جيدة اصدار معاملات بهذه الرسوم المنخفضة جدا لانه لا احد يمكنه توقع متى ترتفع الرسوم مجددا بما ان الأمر كله بيد المعدنين. و اذا كان حاليا هناك تنافس شديد بسبب كثرة احواض التعدين و صعوبة تحصيل المعاملات فانوهذا لا يعني ان الوضع سيبقى فعلا كذلك. أوكي أتفق انها خاصية ممتازة امكانية تحديد اقل من ساتوشي واحد ثمن واحد vbyte و انا اعتقد جيدا في اهمية هذه الخاصية في المستقبل حين يرتفع سعر البيتكوين الى مستويات قياسية اكبر و اكثر و لكن حاليا قد لا يكون لذلك داعي اذا كان 1 ساتوشي و 2 ساتوشي ليست بقيمة كبيرة. منذ ايام لاحظت انخفاض الرسوم و ظهر لي المعدل العام هو 2 ساتوشي فجربت و وضعت واحد ساتوشي فاضطررت لانتظار عشرة بلوكات بما مقداره ساعتين زمن تأخير تقريبا لاتمكن من تأكيد المعاملة. صحيح ان خاصية تعديل الرسوم ممكنة لكن انا متأكد انها ليست في متناول الجميع اي لا يعرفها الكثيرون.


اتوقع ان يكون ذلك متاحا في تحديثات سيرفيرات الكتروم في المستقبل القريب بما ان ذلك سيصبح ضرورة مع ارتفاع اسعار البيتكوين و مواصلة احواض التعدين قبول رسوم بهذه الدرجة من الانخفاض. كذلك لا استغرب ان تضيف المحفظات المركزية هذه الخاصية على تطبيقاتها او ربما اطلاق محفظات جديدة تمتاز بهذا.

يدعوني هذا للتفكير في نجاعة شبكة البرق و ما اذا كان ستبقى حاحة لها اذا واصلت احواض التعدين قبول معاملات برسوم منخفضة جدا.

Awww! I am flattered by this proposal I don't know though if any company would be interested in hiring a Latin translator =)))


Both of these statements are so true!


And I just learned something new...

---

Thank you for these translations, cygan and M47AK16!

---

And here we go...

• [Newbies] Read this before you stake an address by BlackHatCoiner: [SPA] [RUS] [UKR] [ROM] [PID] [CRO] [POR] [GER] [POL]

At the moment, this topic has 9 translations and 1 more ise needed. The available languages are: [POL] [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [TUR] [FIL] [BAN] [URD] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of cygan, paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus021, mindrust / mela65, Peanutswar, DS, Adiljutt156 and M47AK16.

• How to Export/Import Labels In Popular Wallets by Pmalek: [PID] [RUS] [ROM] [CRO] [UKR] [URD] [IDN] [GER]

At the moment, this topic has 8 translations and 2 more are needed. The available languages are: [POL] [FRE] [ARA] [SPA] [TUR] [FIL] [BAN] [POR] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Porf, mindrust / mela65, Peanutswar, DS, r_victory and M47AK16.

• Writing a welcome message by theymos: [PID] [URD] [SPA] [ROM] [RUS] [UKR] [HIN]

At the moment, this topic has 7 translations and 3 more are needed. The available languages are: [POL] [GER] [RUS] [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [TUR] [UKR] [FIL] [BAN] [POR] [HIN] [CRO]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of cygan, paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus021, mindrust / mela65, Peanutswar, DS, r_victory, and katanic97.

• Satoshi's lesson by theymos: [PID] [TUR] [RUS] [GER] [SPA] [POL] [URD] [HIN]

At the moment, this topic has 8 translations and 2 more are needed. The available languages are: [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [UKR] [FIL] [BAN] [POR] [HIN] [CRO] [URD] [ROM]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus021, DrBeer, Peanutswar, DS, r_victory, katanic97, Adiljutt156 and myself.

All in all, we should complete 8 more translations in total, until end of September

مجتمع مونيرو يشكك في مصداقية هذا الشخص وفي نواياه أيضا، وفقًا لتصريحاته هو يعتبر هذا الهجوم تجربة استراتيجية تهدف إلى اختبار قوة الشبكة وكشف نقاط ضعفها. وكذلك يحاول إثبات الفرضيات الاقتصادية:
لكن المجتمع يشكك في نواياه كما أنهم يشككون في صحة كلامه حول سيطرة حوض التعدين Qubic على 51% من قوة الشبكة حيث وفق أغلب الترجيحات أنهم لايملكون سوى 43-40% حتى الآن.

بغض النظر عن مصداقية ادعائه ولكن هذه التجربة حسب رأيي ورأي الأغلبية تضر بالشبكة أكثر ما تفيدها.