khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: yhiaali3 on Today at 02:36:46 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 09, 2026, 11:59:29 PM

يعني مسؤولية الحماية هنا تعق على عاتق المنصات التي تستخدم البوابة ولايمكن للمستخدم فعل أي شيء سوى تجنب استخدام الخدمة حاليا حتى يتم ترقية النظام وإصلاح الثغرات.

اذا كان مستخدمو البوابة غير واعيين بما يحصل و يثقون بالبوابة ثقة عمياء فانهم بلا شك يفتقرون لابسط بديهيات التعامل بالكريبتو. انا فعلا اعتقد ان من يدمج بوابة btcpay لابد ان يكون من المهتمين بالمجال و لديه الدراية التقنية اللازمة مهما كان المتجر صغيرا. عدم متابعة التحديثات باستمرار يعني ان درجة المخاطرة تبقى دوما عالية حتى لو ليس هناك ثغرات في الوقت الحالي. ما حصل مؤخرا مع محفظة هاردوير من اختراق خطير يجب ان يكون قد رفع الراية الحمراء لدى الجميع بانه لا يجب الوثوق بأي نظام و ان القاعدة صحيحة بان لكل نظام ثغرات تنتظر من يكتشفها ليستغلها. طبعا من حسن الحظ ان هناك بدائل موثوقة للبوابة الى حين تجاوز الازمة. يكفي ان يكون المستخدم مواكبا لما يحصل فقط.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 09, 2026, 11:59:29 PM

^^
اعتقد ان درجة الخطورة تعتمد على نوع الثغرة اخي.
بالفعل، btcpay هي بوابة دفع و تقوم بمعالجة عمليات الدفع، لكن ان كانت الثغرة تمكن المخترق من تغيير عناوين الدفع مثلا فانها ستكون خطيرة جدا.
لا اعرف ان كانت هناك طريقة لتنبيه جميع مستخدمي هذا البرنامج بشكل الي او ايقاف النسخ المعنية عن العمل لتجنب وقوع اي اضرار او خسائر مادية لان بعض المستخدمين لا ينتبهون لمثل هذه التنبيهات و لا يتابعون اخر اخبار البرامج التي يستعملونها.

حسب بينانس فإن هناك ثغرة خطيرة يتم استغلالها حالياً بنشاط، وتؤثر بشكل خاص على المستخدمين الذين يقومون بتشغيل عقد شبكة البرق (Lightning Network) باستخدام برنامج LND.
https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/353838960842529

بالنسبة ل btcpay فلايوجد هناك تطبيق يتم تحميله أو تحديثه وإنما كما تفضات أخي هو بوابة دفع يمكن استخدامها في أي متجر أو منصة أو خدمات دفع على الانترنت وبالتالي فإن خطورة الثغرات في هذا النظام تنبع من كونه نظام استضافة ذاتي بالأساس يعني إذا تمكن المخترق من تعديل عناوين الدفع داخل الخادم فستتحول الأموال مباشرة إلى محفظته دون علم صاحب المتجر حتى.

يعني مسؤولية الحماية هنا تعق على عاتق المنصات التي تستخدم البوابة ولايمكن للمستخدم فعل أي شيء سوى تجنب استخدام الخدمة حاليا حتى يتم ترقية النظام وإصلاح الثغرات.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 07, 2026, 08:59:23 PM

I just took a look at your website and found the "What happens if I clear my cookies or switch devices?" section in your FAQ really interesting and I think anyone planning to play here should read it carefully.
If someone clears his browser cookies without saving the recovery code, his account and his funds associated will be gone forever. I checked and it seems your system doesn’t allow a logged-in user to log out before saving the recovery code, this is good but it is not enough. At least, you should force users to save their recovery code before letting them make their first deposit.

Wow that is Interesting. That is why itis good to read ToS before playing in any casino be a poker or slot casino. Someone like me that like to clear reset browser preference and cookies whenever my device disturbed me and hanging when using might not use this because sometimes I clear it when it is hanging. And not only this site, we should read every casino Tod before using.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 07, 2026, 10:57:43 PM

^^
Tron used to have one of the fastest and cheapest transactions but that is no longer the case. The member above has shared some chains that offer way lower transaction fees that you can use.

However, in some cases, it’s not always about the transaction fees. There are other factors to take into consideration before choosing which chain to use.
For example, sometimes you will be forced to choose Tron although it has higher fees just because the wallet or service you are withdrawing the coins to doesn’t support other chains.

If you are using spinly to gamble then it is fine but withdrawal is entirely free from spinly, I do not know if is only limited to some chains but when make withdrawal from spinly I don't spend any fee to get my payment from the site, of course sig payment are directly deposited into the site and when making withdrawal they do not take any charges and there is no hidden fee from them, however even if you are gambling there are chances for you not to be charged as well.

Quote from: Catenaccio on Today at 03:17:38 PM

Below your post, he ignored above posts from me and you, to continue with posting his next one, that again is non sense. With signature ban is around, he looks to be very brave to posting with this style. Maybe he checked and got good health post score, so he saw no risk with his account by posing this way but honestly I don't know why he posted like this.

If you read the last pages of this thread, anyone can see his spammy behavior. But if you only look in the post history of a user with no context of the other posts, you will probably think it's a normal post where he is helping someone to choose the best network with the best fees. Tongue

A signature ban would clean a lot of future spam from the Spinly thread and maybe there could be more real discussions about the casino Roll Eyes

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 07, 2026, 10:57:43 PM

^^
Tron used to have one of the fastest and cheapest transactions but that is no longer the case. The member above has shared some chains that offer way lower transaction fees that you can use.

However, in some cases, it’s not always about the transaction fees. There are other factors to take into consideration before choosing which chain to use.
For example, sometimes you will be forced to choose Tron although it has higher fees just because the wallet or service you are withdrawing the coins to doesn’t support other chains.

This is correct, but I never encountered a wallet or service that does not accept at least one: Ethereum, Solana, Polygon

To accept only TRON it is probably a service paid by the developers of the tron blockchain Grin

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 06, 2026, 08:59:46 PM

Technical knowledge can help protect you from being scammed but it isn't enough. For better safety, you also need to be smart and use common sense.

Scammers, especially those who are good at and master social engineering can be very smart. Some of them are so smart that they can use your own technical knowledge against you. They will exploit your overconfidence (thinking you are safe because you have technical knowledge) and use it against you.

I love the phrase "using your technical knowledge" against you. I have seen it happen. When someone is so confident of themselves, they fall for small tricks and when they are scammed, they'll feel ashamed of telling others about it. Some tekky guys fall for scam but they cover up and deal with it in silence.

Another angle is that the scammers will throw their bait on your emotions. If your sense of judgement is beclouded by emotions, you will easily do stupid stuffs.

So, technical knowledge alone is obviously not enough.

Quote from: mikel_012 on August 07, 2026, 06:17:20 PM

I have to be honest and say this is not the first time I see a post from him that looks like a filler post. Like a post that does not have a purpose

I can only say that if you want to write anything, maybe because you need to make posts for a signature campaign, at least try not to say something that is absolutely wrong and the complete opposite of the true. Saying that the most expensive network is the cheapest is comically funny Grin

https://gasfeesnow.com now is saying $2 USD with TRON, $0.01 with Ethereum and $0.001 with Solana Grin

Below your post, he ignored above posts from me and you, to continue with posting his next one, that again is non sense. With signature ban is around, he looks to be very brave to posting with this style. Maybe he checked and got good health post score, so he saw no risk with his account by posing this way but honestly I don't know why he posted like this.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 07, 2026, 10:57:43 PM

Tron used to have one of the fastest and cheapest transactions but that is no longer the case. The member above has shared some chains that offer way lower transaction fees that you can use.

From the time of Tron used to be one of fastest and cheapest chains for transactions especially for stable coins like USDT to the present, it's a considerable long time. Honestly I can not remind my last time to use TRC20 chain for my USDT transactions and because I don't care about TRX so when I stopped using TRC20 chain for USDT transactions, that means I no longer used that chain.

261. 397157: Magnavox (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
262. 397633: Abiky (Trust: +25 / =1 / -0) (523 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
263. 397737: hilariousetc (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2603 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
264. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
265. 401014: Ultegra134 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1063 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
266. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1340 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
267. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (85 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
268. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
269. 407112: deathdealer1252 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
270. 407892: micromen (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
271. 409704: Acura3600 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (286 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
272. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
273. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
274. 430390: psycodad (Trust: neutral) (2523 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
275. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
276. 454323: Raimonn (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
277. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (6365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 502704: zimbo123 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 507015: BtcCrazy1 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +64 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (677 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +34 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 531201: d4rkwizard (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1049 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 549786: $crypto$ (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (755 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (263 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust: neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 553678: Mr. Big (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (231 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (751 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (10321 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 558138: elokk (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (19 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5259 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 689964: RariBest (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 705593: gt_addict (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (124 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 740502: condoras (Trust: +15 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 751988: Taskford (Trust: neutral) (559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (597 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (91 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (661 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust: neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =7 / -0) (821 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (231 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1014 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (121 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2153 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +69 / =1 / -0) (2765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust: neutral) (1690 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2907 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 878630: TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (971 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2611 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +142 / =4 / -0) (6748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 881799: altcoinb (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (714 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 886369: michellee (Trust: neutral) (410 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1855 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 900408: spirits (Trust: neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1263 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
353. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +37 / =1 / -0) (3594 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
354. 910236: Woodie (Trust: neutral) (870 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
355. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1251 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
356. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1215 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
357. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
358. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
359. 926962: xLays (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
360. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
361. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
362. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
363. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2114 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
364. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (142 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
365. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
366. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +13 / =6 / -0) (1399 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1219 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1111 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 965120: celeborne (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (780 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3600 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust: neutral) (7348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (3340 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 07, 2026, 10:31:35 PM

I noticed that most no-kyc and VPN-friendly casinos allow their customers to use VPNs to bypass some game provider restrictions. I understand that this doesn’t make much sense (and I always advised users against doing it), but it is what it is.
However, in the conversation shared above, it looks like the support agent was referring to slot and casino games, so things might be different with to the sportsbook.

I would recommend contacting customer support to clarify this point and get their confirmation before using a VPN to access the sportsbook.

They always have terms to treat accounts with cheating behavior and one of things for consideration is using VPN. It's quite controversial like if you use VPN, but don't cheat anything at a casino, you will not have problems but who knows what will happen.

Old and reputable casinos might keep up their promises to customers but it's very different and not reliable with new casinos. You can not trust their sayings easily so to be safe, and just in case, let's avoid using VPN.

With cheaters, they will try because VPN is like their ways to go for masking their geolocations and do their cheating works.
With people who actually care about privacy, VPN will be their favorite tool.

But with users who don't care about privacy, if they don't want to suddenly have troubles with online casinos, just don't use VPN. So the advice is different case by case for different users and their priorities on privacy as well as their accounts and funds.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 06, 2026, 10:38:55 PM

I'm curious to know, if anyone can invite their friends and anyone can claim the no-wagering bonus (please correct me if I'm wrong), how can they be so sure that the abusers are forum members?

That $20 bonus is only currently active and available for Bitcointalk members. Plus, I'm pretty sure the sign-up link coming from this forum had a tracker on it, too.
And aside from IP addresses, a casino can also cross check login and play sessions, they betting patterns and many other things that could ultimately tell them if a specific list of account are owned and operated by a single entity.

One of a casino's aim is to grow their number of users/players, so, I'm sure banning a couple of accounts isn't done on a whim without proper investigation. Wink

As for the issue if SCORAS team should present further proof, I believe they've already made a statement about that. Privacy comes first. It's now up to other casinos to impose their own checks to avoid similar instances happening within their own platform.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:59:53 PM

Quote from: laijsica on August 04, 2026, 02:02:18 AM

I have doubts about the amount you mentioned. You really bet such a huge amount and lost the amount in one day. You bet continuously and this amount is $3k.

No, he only lost $100, and the $3k is his total wager. Losing $100 is not that huge amount to be honest, and losing it in one day does not raise any suspicions.

The interesting part is that this user complained about this casino a month or so ago and called it a scam (to which Kikabet’s representative responded and debunked his claims), but for some weird reason, he is still playing there. This raises questions about his real motives. If you don’t like a casino then just leave.

Honestly this just sounds like anger after losing money, not a real Kikabet problem. Losing makes it easy to blame the casino. Could just be bad luck too. He called Kikabet a scam a month ago and still kept playing, kind of hard to take that seriously as a complaint.

So maybe it's not about the bonus or rakeback system. It's about how he reacts to losing. If there is clear proof that a bonus did not arrive or support ignored him, then that is worth talking about. Right now it just sounds like frustration.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:38:55 PM

I'm curious to know, if anyone can invite their friends and anyone can claim the no-wagering bonus (please correct me if I'm wrong), how can they be so sure that the abusers are forum members?

Because the friends who are invited by someone will also have to be members of this forum, even they need to be full members+ to join this reward program.
I think these two rules are enough for them, and additionally IP address, MAC(don't know if they take this), as well as the other processes that their Risk Management team knows well?

Quote from: SCORAS on July 31, 2026, 08:45:32 AM

Requirements:
• Be a BitcoinTalk Full Member or above
• Post your BitcoinTalk username and your SCORAS User ID in this thread (or send it via PM if you prefer)

Quote

Personally, I believe that if they can prove without any doubt that those abusers have bitcointalk accounts, then they should expose them publicly here.

I don't think they will do this because it will definitely identify those who abuse, but SCORAS casino will violate the privacy of its own users, which could backfire on them. Roll Eyes

Although from their end they punished the abusers on their platform.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:46 PM

Technical knowledge can help protect you from being scammed but it isn't enough. For better safety, you also need to be smart and use common sense.

Scammers, especially those who are good at and master social engineering can be very smart. Some of them are so smart that they can use your own technical knowledge against you. They will exploit your overconfidence (thinking you are safe because you have technical knowledge) and use it against you.

On reflection, maybewe can distinguish between technical, and non-technical knowledge.

Technical knowledge is usually necessary to guard against fraud or hacking, but it is limited to the technical aspects of security. However, scammers have numerous ways to lure potential victims, and the most common method is an emotional appeal. Scammers frequently use this tactic to deceive targets, often tricking them into unwittingly compromising their own security, whether by dangling an offer that seems "too good to be true", or by creating a false sense of urgency. That is precisely when scammers typically strike.

Therefore, I believe that technical knowledge alone is insufficient to protect yourself from fraud or hacking. You also need to understand non-technical factors, and familiarize yourself with the methods scammers use. By doing so, you will recognize their deceptions, and be better equipped to protect yourself against such crimes.

Quote from: DPHOR on August 03, 2026, 11:01:52 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on July 30, 2026, 11:37:46 PM

Before we start sharing our own experiences, I suggest you read the forum rules first. If you do, you will realize that posting multiple posts in a row is not allowed. This is nothing but a friendly advice (keep in mind that if you ignore my "friendly" advice, forum moderators/admins can temp-ban your account).
I appreciate being very active, but it’s not about how many posts you make (to bump the thread), but it’s more about how many concerns you address.

However, in addition to what you have said above; op can wait for at least 4 to 8 replies then he can quote them gradually and make a single response instead of having to Spam the thread.
I believe this will also help to save their profile from getting knocked down, as everyone must be strictly adhering to the rules and regulations that is here. Being active is not actually the problem, but handling and ironing out cases from their users is always the best.

Noted. Good to know. Thank you! Tip on Kingz.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 05, 2026, 11:29:32 PM

لا اعتقد ان صاحب الموضوع سيعود مجددا للاجابة على اي من تعليقاتنا.

لا اعتقد انه يجيداصلا الحديث بالعربية, لو لاحظت فان هناك مشاركات سابقة من عدة لغات وبالتالي فمن الطبيعي الاعتقاد بانه يستخدم احد ادوات الترجمة التلقائية.
لذلك فعلي الارجح لو استمر بهذه الطريقة سيتم حظر الحساب قريبا.

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on August 05, 2026, 12:01:13 PM

Weekly repayment of 80$ for the big loan has just been sent to your wallet. New total is 1940$ with next payment due Wednesday August 12th. cheers

ID: https://bscscan.com/tx/0x60b984a8b72a15399db955fa7872d51d3e5e3e8317f250eab29b8d5a441ea0bd

I am confirming the receipt, so the new repayment schedule should be as mentioned below:
2026-09-16: 1940$ (repayment weekly)
2026-08-12: 350$

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 05, 2026, 01:54:44 PM

Hi Shasan,
Partial repayment of $200 has been sent to the repayment address (I have sent the proof of payment on telegram).
Please check and confirm.

Once again, thank you for your patience and understanding.

New total loan repayment amount should be 262$, please repay on or before the due date of the loan.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 05, 2026, 11:59:28 PM

Quote from: yhiaali3 on August 01, 2026, 02:25:04 AM

نعم أخي معك حق هذه نقطة مهمة بالفعل إذا تم الإيداع من منصة مركزية فالأموال ستعاد إلى عنوان المحفظة الساخنة للمنصة المركزية وليس إلى حساب المستخدم وبالتالي ستضيع على المستخدمين وبالتالي من قام بالإيداع من المنصات المركزية عليه أن يقوم بسحب أمواله يدويا قبل 13 الشهر الجاري وإلا ستضيع عليه.

الان فقط انتبهت لهذه النقطة. قد تبدو للوهلة الاولى هي القرار الانسب، لكنها ليست كذلك. كما ذكرت اخي، يمكن ان يكون قد تم الايداع من حساب المستخدم على منصة اخرى، سواءا كانت مركزية او لا، و هذا يعني ضياع تلك الاموال. ايضا يمكن انه تمت عملية الايداع من محفظة المستخدم الشخصية لكن لم يعد بامكانه الولوج اليها لسبب او لاخر، و هذا يعني كذلك ضياع تلك الاموال.
بالنسبة للمنصة فهذا هو الحل الامثل حتى تتنصل من اي مسؤولية، لكن يالنسبة للمستخدم فانه قرار سيئ.
هناك حلول عديدة اخرى يمكن اتباعها من شأنها ان تضمن حق المستخدم و تحافظ على سمعة المنصة في نفس الوقت.

معك حق أخي خالد ربما لايكون هذا الخيار الأفضل بالنسبة للمستخدم للأسباب التي ذكرناها
لذلك أرى أن أفضل حل طالما أن العقد الذكي يقوم بكل الامور تلقائيا أن يتم تحديد المحفظة التي ستعاد إليها الأموال تلقائيا في حال انتهاء العقد أو حدوث أي مشاكل غير متوقعة
يعني بمعنى آخر يكون هناك خيار بداية استخدام المستخدم للمنصة اللامركزية وإيداع الأصول هل يريد استخدام هذا العنوان أو عنوان آخر يقوم بتحديده هو يمكنه الوصول إليه في أي وقت، أتوقع هكذا يكون الأمر مقبولا لأن المستخدم يستطيع تحديد عنوان محفظته التي يستخدمها بشكل دائما ويملك مفاتيحها الخاصة.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 02, 2026, 11:59:30 PM

هل يمكنكم على الاقل مشاركة بعض من المشاريع التي قمتم بانجازها حتى يتعرف اي شخص مهتم على مدى جودة خدماتكم؟
بعض المعلومات عن فريق العملمثل سنوات الخبرة و التقنيات التي تتقنونها ستكون ايضا مفيدة.
اتمنى ايضا ان تاخذو بنصيحة الاخ كافلج و توفروا وسائل تواصل اكثر احترافية فذلك من شأنه تعزيز ثقة الاخرين بكم فالصفقات التي يتم النقاش حولها عبر تطبيقات مثل تلغرام لا تنتهي عادة بشكل جيد و الجميع يعرف الاسباب.

كالعادة هي محاولة فاشلة من شخص لا يعرف شيئا عن المنتدى، يتصور انه يمكنه استدراج ضحايا فقط عبر انشاء حساب منتدى و حساب تلغرام. لا استغرب ان يجد من يقتنع بعرضه و ينجح في اقناعه و لكنه متأكد انه اما شخص من خارج المنتدى اي ايس نشطا على المنتدى او انه عضو بحساب جديد لازال يتحسس طريقه وسط المجموعة community.. هذا هو السبب الوحيد الذي يجعلني اتكبد عناء كتابة الردود على هكذا مواضيع لاني اعرف ان المنتدى يسمح بحرية التعبير بما في ذلك نشر اي محتوى حتى لو كان بغاية التحيل واضحة.

نصيحة لكل من يقرأ هذا الموضوع، ابقوا بعيدا عن هكذا عروض و لا تصدقوا اي شخص يقدم عروضا دون اثباتات او ضمانات تؤكد صحة ما يعرضه. هناك محتالون غي كل مكان.

Quote from: longyenthanh on August 03, 2026, 11:11:35 PM

Quote from: DPHOR on August 03, 2026, 11:01:52 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on July 30, 2026, 11:37:46 PM

Before we start sharing our own experiences, I suggest you read the forum rules first. If you do, you will realize that posting multiple posts in a row is not allowed. This is nothing but a friendly advice (keep in mind that if you ignore my "friendly" advice, forum moderators/admins can temp-ban your account).
I appreciate being very active, but it’s not about how many posts you make (to bump the thread), but it’s more about how many concerns you address.

However, in addition to what you have said above; op can wait for at least 4 to 8 replies then he can quote them gradually and make a single response instead of having to Spam the thread.
I believe this will also help to save their profile from getting knocked down, as everyone must be strictly adhering to the rules and regulations that is here. Being active is not actually the problem, but handling and ironing out cases from their users is always the best.

OP isn't representing this casino, he is just a regular user collecting referral links. So I don't know what kind of answers you're expecting, but I wouldn't trust someone impersonating casino representative.

Would it help if the founders confirmed that I’m an official representative?

Quote from: khaled0111 on July 31, 2026, 10:35:01 PM

Quote from: panjul07 on July 27, 2026, 02:30:19 PM

...

Thank you for the explanation. The replies above yours were a bit confusing but now (after you explained it) it’s more clear how their deposit sysem works and it makes more sense. As far as I know, most casinos require a minimum deposit to be able to claim the deposit bonus and I think a $20 minimum is more than fair.
Also, t’s good to know that they sent the no-deposit $5 bonus to some users (as PC confirmed) but I hope the OP will ne more active to clarify some points like the wagering requirement tied to this bonus.

Yes I think the same, although at first I didn’t understand very well what bonuses and minimum deposits were they talking about, everything is clear now. I must confess that I was even willing to deposit $20 to give the casino a good try, but if it is not necessary I will try with the $5 bonus first (there is always time to deposit more later).

Quote from: Agbe on August 02, 2026, 02:25:45 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on July 17, 2026, 11:58:28 PM

edited out

Qzino you can linked your images to your website so that if anyone click them, it will navigate to the website instead of taking the person to the talkimg.com image hosting site.

thank you for your suggestion and let me try working on that

Quote from: DPHOR on Today at 11:01:52 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on July 30, 2026, 11:37:46 PM

Before we start sharing our own experiences, I suggest you read the forum rules first. If you do, you will realize that posting multiple posts in a row is not allowed. This is nothing but a friendly advice (keep in mind that if you ignore my "friendly" advice, forum moderators/admins can temp-ban your account).
I appreciate being very active, but it’s not about how many posts you make (to bump the thread), but it’s more about how many concerns you address.

However, in addition to what you have said above; op can wait for at least 4 to 8 replies then he can quote them gradually and make a single response instead of having to Spam the thread.
I believe this will also help to save their profile from getting knocked down, as everyone must be strictly adhering to the rules and regulations that is here. Being active is not actually the problem, but handling and ironing out cases from their users is always the best.

OP isn't representing this casino, he is just a regular user collecting referral links. So I don't know what kind of answers you're expecting, but I wouldn't trust someone impersonating casino representative.

Quote from: khaled0111 on July 30, 2026, 11:37:46 PM

Before we start sharing our own experiences, I suggest you read the forum rules first. If you do, you will realize that posting multiple posts in a row is not allowed. This is nothing but a friendly advice (keep in mind that if you ignore my "friendly" advice, forum moderators/admins can temp-ban your account).
I appreciate being very active, but it’s not about how many posts you make (to bump the thread), but it’s more about how many concerns you address.

However, in addition to what you have said above; op can wait for at least 4 to 8 replies then he can quote them gradually and make a single response instead of having to Spam the thread.
I believe this will also help to save their profile from getting knocked down, as everyone must be strictly adhering to the rules and regulations that is here. Being active is not actually the problem, but handling and ironing out cases from their users is always the best.

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on Today at 06:09:14 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 02, 2026, 11:25:59 PM

^^
كلامك هذا منطقي الى حد كبير، فعلى الاغلب بعد هذه الحادثة ستقل ثقة المستخدمين، و خاصة المستخدمين العاديين الذين ليست لديهم خلفية تقنية جيدة، بمحافظ الهاردوير حتى و ان كانت الثغرة التي تم استغلالها هنا لا تعنيهم.

ليس لدي أي احصائيات ظاهرة (كنت قد رأييت مقالا لكني لا أجده)، لكني رأيت في تويتر أن هنالك الكثير من الناس التي أصبحت تدعم فكرة شراء البيتكوين و ابقائه في كوينيايز أو IBIT يعني ال ETF الخاص بشركة BlackRock.

و هذا في رأيي فكر خطير و قد يؤدي الى عواقب كارثية ما اذا عممت هذه الفكرة في المستقبل و أصبحت كوين باز أو المنصات المركزية هي الوجهة الأولى لتخزين البيتكوين عوض المحافظ non-custodial.

هذا نتيجة مباشرة لما حصل. ستنخفض مستويات الثقة بالمحفظات non-custodial مقابل ارتفاع حظوظ المحفظات المركزية كمحفظات الواب و حسابات منصات التداول. بالطبع هذا كارثي و فيه مخاطرة كبيرة لانه فضلا عن احتمالية فقدان تلك الاموال لسبب او لاخر، فان تراكم تلك الاصول لدى المنصات سيزيد من تغولها و يصبح من الصعب على التشريعات و السلطات التحكم بها او مراقبة انشطتها. بالضبط كما يحصل مع النظام البنكي، اذ ان الحكومات تخشى من انهيار او افلاس اي بنك فتسارعوالى انقاذه كلما مر بأزمة و هو ما جعل اصحاب المؤسسات البنكية يتمتعون بصلاحيات تصل الى حد السرقة و الاحتيال دون خوف من العواقب.

الامر الثاني الذي فهمته من خلال النقاش في القسم الانجليزي هو بخصوص انه كانت هناك تحذيرات و نداءات من مجتمع المطورين بشأن هكذا ثغرات و احتمالية استغلالها بالرغم من انها تبدو صعبة جدا. طبعا يتم تجاهل تلك النداءات الى ان تحصل الكارثة فلا نجد غير الندم. اؤكد بشدة على نصيحة متابعة النقاش في القسم الانقليزي حتى لمن هم بعيدون عن المجال التقني. هناك حقا ما يمكن متابعته.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 02, 2026, 11:25:59 PM

^^
كلامك هذا منطقي الى حد كبير، فعلى الاغلب بعد هذه الحادثة ستقل ثقة المستخدمين، و خاصة المستخدمين العاديين الذين ليست لديهم خلفية تقنية جيدة، بمحافظ الهاردوير حتى و ان كانت الثغرة التي تم استغلالها هنا لا تعنيهم.

ليس لدي أي احصائيات ظاهرة (كنت قد رأييت مقالا لكني لا أجده)، لكني رأيت في تويتر أن هنالك الكثير من الناس التي أصبحت تدعم فكرة شراء البيتكوين و ابقائه في كوينيايز أو IBIT يعني ال ETF الخاص بشركة BlackRock.

و هذا في رأيي فكر خطير و قد يؤدي الى عواقب كارثية ما اذا عممت هذه الفكرة في المستقبل و أصبحت كوين باز أو المنصات المركزية هي الوجهة الأولى لتخزين البيتكوين عوض المحافظ non-custodial.
يعني حتى ما رأيناه في السابق[1]. من تهكير و افلاس شركات يثبت أن هذه المنصات لا يجب أن تستخدم لابقاء الأموال في المدى البعيد.

(ETFs بطبيعة الحال قصة مختلفة و ليس متوفرة للجميع)

[1] https://x.com/LukeMikic21/status/2084022326958739758