khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 11:59:20 PM

I used to use TrustWallet but never used its built-in exchange, to be honest.
As it has been said above, TrustWallet is non-custodial as it gives you access to your private keys but, as a closed-source wallet, there is no guarantee that you are the only one who has access to them.
Regarding the built-in exchange, as I said, I didn’t use it so I don’t know how it works but if in order to complete a trade, you need to send your coins to a third-party service then the moment you do that, those coins are no longer under your custody.

Updating you on recent happening with trust wallet is changing from a none custodial wallet into custodial wallet but the public still have Trust wallet as listed among non custodial wallets.

Trustwallet is now own and operated by binance the biggest global cryptocurrency exchange, and their made some changes to the trustwallet source codes when the claimed not independently verified that there is a malware in the source code.

Ever since that time, trust wallet have gradually turned into an exchange and alot of trade going on, so now on trustwallet should be treated as custodial wallet.

Quote from: ObeyKnock on September 24, 2026, 01:10:23 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 23, 2026, 11:33:57 PM

المعاملات على شبكة البيتكوين من اكثر المعاملات التي يمكن تتبعها سهولة و هناك شركات مختصة في تحليل بيانات الشبكة و ربط العناوين ببعضها و باصحابها

من الغريب أن أحد الأشياء التي فعلها زنجاني والتي ربما أدت إلى اكتشافهم السريع هو استخدام البيتكوين لتحويل هذه المبالغ الكبيرة. نظرًا لحجم هذه المعاملات، فإن أي شخص يرغب في الحفاظ على درجة معينة من الخصوصية ربما كان سيستخدم عملة أكثر خصوصية، مثل Monero. تحتفظ البيتكوين بسجل دائم وعام لجميع المعاملات. من الممكن أن زنجاني اعتقد أن البيتكوين كانت مقبولة على نطاق أوسع وأكثر سيولة، وأن هذه الميزة طغت على أي فائدة من استخدام عملة توفر الخصوصية.

اتفهم فكرتك و استغرابك في نفس الوقت، لكن منصة BitBank لا تدعم عملة مونيرو XMR. أم أنك تقصد أنه كان يمكنه تحويل المبلغ على منصة اخرى؟ طبعا هذا شبه مستحيل بسبب ضخامة المبلغ و ان اغلب المنصات التداول قد الغت دعمها لعملة Monero بسبب التشديدات التنظيمية على عملات الخصوصية. اعتقد ان البيتكوين كان الخيار الافضل بما انه يمكن استعمال الخلاطات لاخفاء التتبع لاحقا حتى لو كان البلوكشين يفضحهك اليوم.

ملاحظة خالد صحيحة لانه قد تطرقنا بالسابق الى عقوبات فرضتها الخزانة الامريكية على منصة ثبت تعاملها مع البنك المركزي الايراني لمساعدته على تجاوز العقوبات. لكن حسب ما اذكر فانها كانت منصة اخرى و ليست BitBank. للاشارة فانه حسب نفس المقال في الرابط فان BitBank هي اخر منصة يتم معاقبتها في علاقة بالنظام الايراني لان جميع المنصات الاخرى المتاحة للايرانيؤن قد تمت معاقبتهم.

Quote from: Johnlomape on September 26, 2026, 03:38:53 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 09:59:51 PM

Quote from: Promocodeudo on September 25, 2026, 09:06:18 PM

...

So you are basically saying that we should try every casino by ourselves because reviews might be fake and can’t be trusted? Well, unfortunately, that’s not possible and even if it was possible then it definitely isn’t recommended. You could simply lose your money while trying to find whether a new casino is legitimate or not.
What you need to do is read reviews on reputable review websites and check the reviewer’s profile to see if he is a reputable reviewer and whether he has reviewed other casinos or not. Those who have only one or two reviews on their profile are usually fake and can’t be trusted.

Trying different casinos just because of fear of using a strict casino that can confiscate fund when rule is broken can still make a player falls in the hand of casinos that don't take shit. Not all casinos reviews online are true and it is necessary to look for a good platform like the forum where users of a casino both old and new can share their experience about the casinos they have used in the past and present.

Not all casinos is ready to confiscate users fund when a rule is broken or when abuse is noticed, some casinos can allow a users that have broken their rules multiple times to withdraw their money and leave if they want to pardon the user for his wrong doings.

Exactly. You shouldn't rely only on online reviews. It's much better to read real stories from users on forums and see how a casino handles disputed situations. But even that doesn't guarantee complete objectivity.
When it comes to rule violations, it really depends on the casino itself: some will immediately block the account and confiscate the funds, while others may give the player a chance to withdraw the money and simply close the account. It's better to read the casino's rules beforehand so there are no unpleasant surprises later.

Quote from: Donneski on September 26, 2026, 01:59:09 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 09:59:51 PM

Quote from: Promocodeudo on September 25, 2026, 09:06:18 PM

...

So you are basically saying that we should try every casino by ourselves because reviews might be fake and can’t be trusted? Well, unfortunately, that’s not possible and even if it was possible then it definitely isn’t recommended. You could simply lose your money while trying to find whether a new casino is legitimate or not.
What you need to do is read reviews on reputable review websites and check the reviewer’s profile to see if he is a reputable reviewer and whether he has reviewed other casinos or not. Those who have only one or two reviews on their profile are usually fake and can’t be trusted.

I understand the point you're tryna make and how one can actually run quick check on a reviewer to know the authenticity of their review. But I don't think there's any review site that's 100% immune to paid promotions or fake credibility.

Taking time to do due diligence doesn't mean one must risk huge capital on unknown casinos and gambling platforms, it's mostly about making small testing then combining it with feedback from the community instead of totally outsourcing your trust to third-party review sites.

Exactly my point I agree with you because no matter the amount of due diligence you do about a casino before using them it doesn't mean that you can be so certain of newer casino's reputation to be able to trust them with huge deposits and transactions.
So getting the reputation of a casino doesn't necessarily need to be from the reviews done by players as that can be manipulated in some ways and genuine feedback can not be guaranteed to some extent.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 11:59:20 PM

As it has been said above, TrustWallet is non-custodial as it gives you access to your private keys but, as a closed-source wallet, there is no guarantee that you are the only one who has access to them.

For this reason I consider such wallet not to be 100% guaranteed or saved to be honest since I can't be certain of being the only person that has access to the private keys. However, i don't use trust wallet right from time because of this issue. Electrum has been my choice since I came into the space and I have never regret using it, not even in a day.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 17, 2026, 11:33:30 PM

Quote from: Hazink on September 17, 2026, 02:57:39 AM

That's the difference and Joyce might not have been aware of the forum review campaigns and how it's being done, where the manager pays members not to praise the casino but to try the casino and give their honest review,

Seriously! I just hope this is nothing more than a mere misunderstanding. Do you really believe that Joyce is not aware of the review campaigns being held on this forum? I can’t really remember, but I believe Joyce has even organized some of these campaigns Cheesy

And just to add to what you said, many members participate in review campaigns and post positive feedback just because they believe this is the only way they will get paid (or get a chane to be accepted in a signature campaign). Those members are to be added to your ignore list.

Review campaigns are honest feedbacks from few selected participants who are expected to use the features of a platform and share their experiences bluntly how they felt about the platform. Such campaigns avails the manager and project the opportunity to liaise with each other in knowing where the platform is lacking and what to do immediately to effectively cover up any lapses being observed by the participants. Not only that, if there are any bugs while using the platform it could be detected by the reviewers who would make it known so it could be fixed up immediately. So this is just my own view about such engagement and anybody writing their reports would be doing so based on their experience while reviewing the platform, bad or good, it is worth sharing reasons being that they have already been engaged to do so.

Quote from: Johnlomape on September 19, 2026, 09:18:17 AM

Quote from: CryptSafe on September 18, 2026, 12:21:02 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 17, 2026, 12:11:04 AM

And that’s exactly the misconception most gamblers have and fail to understand. Just because you know a lot about sports (skilled) doesn’t necessarily mean you will earn more from sports betting than from casino games.
The trick here is that regardless of how skilled you are, you need to understand that the odds provider knows more than you do and, in most cases, they get inside information that you don’t have access to. That’s how they can set the odds for the events in a way that makes them always in their favor.

You are right, this point you have raised is what many players fail to understand. Odds providers act on information since they are very close to the sports cycle and in such cases, they would be very careful to not make any mistake on themselves not to make any losses. Even when match is still live, haven't you also noticed that they also change odds? While game is ongoing they change odds if I am not mistaken because I have experienced it for sometime now while game is live.

Odd providers are always watching and counting on probability of what team is going to win a match and they are busy working on our psychology of what options we could be opting for looking at the probability of the match.
There is no trick in gambling and there has been occasions when you could make profit easily and most times you will not make anything irrespective of your prediction and analysis done to increase the chances of increasing individual bankroll.

This is why it's important to have some sports knowledge, as in, live odds. When a new piece of information such as a goal, injury, red card or other such occurrence alters the estimated probability, the price may shift rapidly. What I like about the better is that he or she doesn't just have to analyze the outcome, but they also need to evaluate whether the odds are worth it. The only winning prediction is one that is capped by the probability and margin included in the market price.

Quote from: hd49728 on Today at 03:33:05 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 10:49:01 PM

Everyone has their own preference to which currency to use, but the idea that smaller bets increase your chances of fulfilling the wagering requirement is a common misconception.
I have to admit that I used to think the same, but mathematically, that’s not true. The chances of completing the wagering requirement depend on your bankroll, the game RTP and, of course, your luck. The same applies to bonus buys as well.

Bet smaller means you will have to bet more times and in long run, difference is not too big between bet small and bet big. Because the most important thing is bet in many times to reach the required wager volume, and factors that affect it are things like you already mentioned: bankroll, RTP of games you played with, and luck factor.

Skillful gamblers and participants in wagering contests will know well about these factors, choose good games to play but during playing and wagering time, they must depend on luck factor to defend their gambling capital and achieving wagering requirement.

I think the important distinction is between bankroll longevity and the actual probability of completing the wager requirement.

Betting smaller doesn't increase the mathematical chance of completing the requirement by itself. It mainly allows your bankroll to survive more spins and reduces the impact of individual losing bets. If you have a limited bankroll, that might still a reasonable strategy.

For ex. the wagering requirement of $1,000, betting $0.028 (base on @Renampun) means you need roughly 35,700 spins, while betting $1 requires only 1,000 spins. The amount wagered is still the same.

And that's right that the total wager volume still has to be reached. RTP, bankroll, bet size, and luck of course, determine whether you survive long enough to get there.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 09:59:51 PM

Quote from: Promocodeudo on September 25, 2026, 09:06:18 PM

...

So you are basically saying that we should try every casino by ourselves because reviews might be fake and can’t be trusted? Well, unfortunately, that’s not possible and even if it was possible then it definitely isn’t recommended. You could simply lose your money while trying to find whether a new casino is legitimate or not.
What you need to do is read reviews on reputable review websites and check the reviewer’s profile to see if he is a reputable reviewer and whether he has reviewed other casinos or not. Those who have only one or two reviews on their profile are usually fake and can’t be trusted.

Trying different casinos just because of fear of using a strict casino that can confiscate fund when rule is broken can still make a player falls in the hand of casinos that don't take shit. Not all casinos reviews online are true and it is necessary to look for a good platform like the forum where users of a casino both old and new can share their experience about the casinos they have used in the past and present.

Not all casinos is ready to confiscate users fund when a rule is broken or when abuse is noticed, some casinos can allow a users that have broken their rules multiple times to withdraw their money and leave if they want to pardon the user for his wrong doings.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 09:59:51 PM

Quote from: Promocodeudo on September 25, 2026, 09:06:18 PM

...

So you are basically saying that we should try every casino by ourselves because reviews might be fake and can’t be trusted? Well, unfortunately, that’s not possible and even if it was possible then it definitely isn’t recommended. You could simply lose your money while trying to find whether a new casino is legitimate or not.
What you need to do is read reviews on reputable review websites and check the reviewer’s profile to see if he is a reputable reviewer and whether he has reviewed other casinos or not. Those who have only one or two reviews on their profile are usually fake and can’t be trusted.

I understand the point you're tryna make and how one can actually run quick check on a reviewer to know the authenticity of their review. But I don't think there's any review site that's 100% immune to paid promotions or fake credibility.

Taking time to do due diligence doesn't mean one must risk huge capital on unknown casinos and gambling platforms, it's mostly about making small testing then combining it with feedback from the community instead of totally outsourcing your trust to third-party review sites.

260. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
261. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (85 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
262. 405709: ds06 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
263. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
264. 407112: deathdealer1252 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
265. 409704: Acura3600 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (289 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
266. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
267. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
268. 430390: psycodad (Trust: neutral) (2556 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
269. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
270. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (21715 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
271. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (1535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
272. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
273. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
274. 502704: zimbo123 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
275. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
276. 507015: BtcCrazy1 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
277. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +62 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (769 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +32 / =2 / -1) (880 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 531201: d4rkwizard (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1066 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 549786: $crypto$ (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (763 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust: neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 553678: Mr. Big (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (231 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (795 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 558138: elokk (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (19 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 689964: RariBest (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (2082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 705593: gt_addict (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (124 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 740502: condoras (Trust: +14 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 751988: Taskford (Trust: neutral) (568 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (609 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (91 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust: neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (4122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +4 / =7 / -0) (839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (231 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (1016 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (121 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +62 / =1 / -1) (2775 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust: neutral) (1726 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2970 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2612 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +139 / =4 / -0) (6876 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 881799: altcoinb (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (730 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 886369: michellee (Trust: neutral) (410 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 888099: finaleshot2016 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (933 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1855 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 898928: Theb (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 900408: spirits (Trust: neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +35 / =1 / -0) (3617 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 910236: Woodie (Trust: neutral) (882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1256 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2162 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (163 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
353. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +12 / =6 / -0) (1444 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
354. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1402 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
355. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
356. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1119 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
357. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
358. 965120: celeborne (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
359. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1517 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
360. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (795 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
361. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
362. 988039: Koal-84 (Trust: neutral) (1475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
363. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
364. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3664 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
365. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
366. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust: neutral) (7545 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +90 / =1 / -0) (4297 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (3369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 10:49:01 PM

Everyone has their own preference to which currency to use, but the idea that smaller bets increase your chances of fulfilling the wagering requirement is a common misconception.
I have to admit that I used to think the same, but mathematically, that’s not true. The chances of completing the wagering requirement depend on your bankroll, the game RTP and, of course, your luck. The same applies to bonus buys as well.

Bet smaller means you will have to bet more times and in long run, difference is not too big between bet small and bet big. Because the most important thing is bet in many times to reach the required wager volume, and factors that affect it are things like you already mentioned: bankroll, RTP of games you played with, and luck factor.

Skillful gamblers and participants in wagering contests will know well about these factors, choose good games to play but during playing and wagering time, they must depend on luck factor to defend their gambling capital and achieving wagering requirement.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 25, 2026, 11:59:20 PM

I used to use TrustWallet but never used its built-in exchange, to be honest.
As it has been said above, TrustWallet is non-custodial as it gives you access to your private keys but, as a closed-source wallet, there is no guarantee that you are the only one who has access to them.
Regarding the built-in exchange, as I said, I didn’t use it so I don’t know how it works but if in order to complete a trade, you need to send your coins to a third-party service then the moment you do that, those coins are no longer under your custody.

Even you don't use the built-in exchange in Trust wallet, you don't exclude all risks if you already used Trust wallet. Since a time of creating your wallet with Trust, using that wallet to store your cryptocurrency, you already accepted risk and actually had risks.

If the wallet has backdoors to give the Trust wallet developers access to your wallet private keys/ mnemonic seeds, all your cryptocurrencies can be stolen anytime in the future.

Using the built-in exchange only escalates risk by requiring you to approve smart contract access. With other wallets, a same principle is applied, revoke a smart contract approval when you finished a trade.

How to revoke token approval.
https://etherscan.io/tokenapprovalchecker
https://revoke.cash/
https://app.unrekt.net/

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:37:53 PM

I just visited it and it still shows "under maintenance"!

I also see their maintenance message when trying to visit the website.
I visited Duelbits several times after the hack incident. I was able to see the Duelbits home page a few times, but even on those occasions, I saw their mainteance message again after reloading the page.

Ambatman, reload the page and you will probably see their maintenance message again.
I hope everything will be back to normal soon.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:37:53 PM

^^
I just visited it and it still shows "under maintenance"!

Recovering from such an incident takes time, that’s totally understandable given that they need to figure out exactly what happened and how their hot wallets got compromised and, most importantly, make sure all the issues are fixed before coming back online.
The most important thing now is to secure the remaining funds in their cold wallets and make sure users funds are safe.

I agree with Ambatman, the website is now back on, but some sections are not yet loading well properly, I think this will be fixed in the next fgew hours. Maybe you could try to refresh your browser.

This is what I see right now

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 07:58:52 PM

للامانة ليست لدي معلومات حول اختراق duelbits و قد سمعت بالحادثة، و هي حادثة مؤسفة، بعد قراءتي لهذا الموضوع. ساقوم بالبحث اكثر لاعرف ما الذي حدث.
ما استطيع ان اؤكده لك، اخي، ان اختراق هذه المنصات سهل للغاية بالنسبة للمحترفين.
السبب هو ان اصحاب هذه المنصات لا يولون اهتماما كبيرا بمدى امان مواقعهم و تطبيقاتهم. كل ما يلزم هو مخترق محترف و يضع نصب عينيه تلك المنصة، في بعض الحالات الامر لا يتطلب مخترقا محترفا لان الثغرات واضحة حتى للمبتدئين.
اسف لسماع ان موقع duelbits تعرض للاختراق و كل ما اتمناه هو ان يتمكنو من تعويض الضحايا.

اضن ان الامر خرج عن السيطرة او ان شيئا ما تم اكتشافه في نظام حماية بعض المحافظ لان في نفس اليوم الان منصة Bitget تتعرض للاختراق وتم تحويل مبالغ كبيرة ايضا من محفظتها الى مخترق. سوف ننتظر الاعلان الرسمي من المنصة بعد ساعات لتاكيد الخبر طبعا، وعلى اي حال نتمنى ان فريق هذه المشاريع قد قامت بحفظ اموال لمثل هذه الحالات لتتمكن من تعويض الخسائر لمستخدميها في اقرب وقت.

يمكن قراءة كامل الخبر هنا : https://x.com/officer_secret/status/2103217359389638778

@Lucano

Yes, unfortunately the delay was caused by the payment provider issue. We completely agree that 12 hours is too long. This is something we are actively addressing, and we appreciate your patience.

@khaled0111

We completely agree. Fast and reliable withdrawals are extremely important, and because we have experienced issues with this provider before, we are taking the situation very seriously. We don't want these delays to become something our players have to expect.

@DabsPoorVersion

Yes, your previously promised deposit boost is still valid, and we have not forgotten about it.

You can also participate in the **Deposit $100 and Get $30 Free** promotion.

And just to make it completely clear: **everything is confirmed from our side, so you can go ahead and deposit now.** You don't need to wait any longer for confirmation.

We will make sure your previously promised boost is taken into consideration as agreed.

Good luck with the deposit and hopefully you get a nice run! 🍌

@Lucano

Correct, the new promotion is available for everyone who meets the requirements. In DabsPoorVersion's case, however, he also had a previously promised personal boost due to the earlier issue, so we will honor that as well.

Regarding the payment provider

We have seen everyone's feedback regarding the withdrawal delays, and we agree with the concerns being raised.

Withdrawals are one of the most important parts of any casino, and players should not have to wonder when their money is going to arrive.

The current delays are related to the payment provider issue we mentioned previously. We are following it closely and will make sure the affected withdrawals are handled.

We also understand the comments saying that because this is not the first time we have experienced an issue with the provider, something needs to change. We are taking that feedback seriously and discussing the situation internally.

Thank you to everyone for the patience. 🍌

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 23, 2026, 11:33:57 PM

المعاملات على شبكة البيتكوين من اكثر المعاملات التي يمكن تتبعها سهولة و هناك شركات مختصة في تحليل بيانات الشبكة و ربط العناوين ببعضها و باصحابها

من الغريب أن أحد الأشياء التي فعلها زنجاني والتي ربما أدت إلى اكتشافهم السريع هو استخدام البيتكوين لتحويل هذه المبالغ الكبيرة. نظرًا لحجم هذه المعاملات، فإن أي شخص يرغب في الحفاظ على درجة معينة من الخصوصية ربما كان سيستخدم عملة أكثر خصوصية، مثل Monero. تحتفظ البيتكوين بسجل دائم وعام لجميع المعاملات. من الممكن أن زنجاني اعتقد أن البيتكوين كانت مقبولة على نطاق أوسع وأكثر سيولة، وأن هذه الميزة طغت على أي فائدة من استخدام عملة توفر الخصوصية.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 23, 2026, 11:59:35 PM

^^
Sorry to hear this but OP said in the reply just above yours that they are experiencing issues with their payment provider which caused the withdrawal delays. The good thing is that users funds are safe.

Since this is not the first time such thing happens and given how important fast and reliable withdrawals are, I guess it’s about time for Scoras to start looking for a better and more reliable payment provider to avoid causing annoyance to their users. jmo.

It is highly recommended, if this situation continues then users will leave.

Quote from: DabsPoorVersion on Today at 12:06:17 AM

Quote from: SCORAS on September 09, 2026, 07:27:29 AM

we will give you a boost on your next deposit. When you are ready to deposit again, simply send us a PM here on the forum and we will make sure the boost is added for you.

Hello SCORAS,
Can I still have this boost on my next deposit on top of your previous promotion that is valid until Oct 1?
I'm planning to join the deposit $100 and get $30 bonus.

Is it valid or I can only choose 1? Cheesy

Thanks!

they just launched a new one, everyone is allowed to join

Quote from: Wakate on Today at 12:35:54 AM

Quote from: Hazink on September 17, 2026, 02:57:39 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 16, 2026, 11:32:57 PM

That’s not always true. Take the review campaigns hosted on this forum where casinos and other services pay forum members to test their services and share their reviews. If you go through some of those campaign threads and read the reviews, you will see that many of them focus on the negative points and the features that need to be added or improved more than just praising the service.

That's the difference and Joyce might not have been aware of the forum review campaigns and how it's being done, where the manager pays members not to praise the casino but to try the casino and give their honest review, not like some shillings jobs and review platform where the casino will have to review what their paid reviewer are doing what ever don't pass review don't get published here even when members are not paid they still test to verify what was said by others if the casino is actually same way it's being praised to be.

The forum members are only interested in genuine reviews and not something that will affect the actual experience of a player from writing what they faced using a casino instead of praising the casino for not being honest with their words.
This forum is different from all other forums that can lie to cover the truth about a casino that is busy treating players anyhow.

Since members of the forum will also play the games of the casinos they will give their honest review when they are paid to make a review but anything outside the reviews done by the forum members you are likely not going to trust most of the things they said because they will not displease the people who asked them to make the reviews. A casino that wants an honest review will choose the forum because members here are experienced and they will give them the best reviews that would help them to identify and work on their services where it is needed.

Quote from: Donneski on September 22, 2026, 12:26:51 PM

Quote from: CryptSafe on September 18, 2026, 12:21:02 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 17, 2026, 12:11:04 AM

And that’s exactly the misconception most gamblers have and fail to understand. Just because you know a lot about sports (skilled) doesn’t necessarily mean you will earn more from sports betting than from casino games.
The trick here is that regardless of how skilled you are, you need to understand that the odds provider knows more than you do and, in most cases, they get inside information that you don’t have access to. That’s how they can set the odds for the events in a way that makes them always in their favor.

You are right, this point you have raised is what many players fail to understand. Odds providers act on information since they are very close to the sports cycle and in such cases, they would be very careful to not make any mistake on themselves not to make any losses. Even when match is still live, haven't you also noticed that they also change odds? While game is ongoing they change odds if I am not mistaken because I have experienced it for sometime now while game is live.

One trap many gamblers fall for is believing that somehow, sports betting is easier or safer than casino games because they know so much about sports especially football.

Bookmakers are wiser than you think they are. They have all the details and data feeds of every game, that's why they you see the odds moving up and down during live games. They move the odds to protect their margins so they don't end up on the loss side regardless of the outcome of the game.

That is what it means taking ten steps ahead. They know that rules so they implore it to be on the safe side otherwise they would lose out entirely to bettors with high odds in their favour. I have also noticed it several times whenever I want to bet, sometimes while on the process off betting, the odds are suspended and locked while I am putting my bet and I will have to wait till it is restored before I continue my betting and it can be frustrating at times. Those guys are very smart too so they are always in the watch to see and to quick actions to be on the safe side otherwise they will losse out to bettors.

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 18, 2026, 08:19:49 PM

بالتاكيد هي ليست خيارات امنة..لكن حسب ما فهمت هي اختيارات "اجبارية"

يجب على المستخدمين تفضيل المنصات التي تنشر عمليات تدقيق دورية لـ Proof of Reserves التي تجريها شركة تدقيق خارجية ذات سمعة طيبة. قد ينطوي ذلك على مستوى معين من المخاطر، ولكنه أقل بكثير مما لديك إذا لم يكن لديك أي فكرة عما إذا كانت المنصة تمتلك أموالك بالفعل، أو إذا كانت قد استثمرتها في عمليات أخرى. على الأقل مع إثبات الاحتياطيات، فأنت تعلم أن لديهم أموالك بالفعل، والتأكيد من طرف ثالث أكثر موثوقية من الإبلاغ الذاتي. لسوء الحظ، من المرجح أن يختار معظم المبتدئين المنصات التي تتمتع بواجهة سهلة الفهم وشاهدوها معلنة، بدلاً من تلك التي تنشر هذه التقارير.

Quote from: Hazink on September 17, 2026, 02:57:39 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 16, 2026, 11:32:57 PM

That’s not always true. Take the review campaigns hosted on this forum where casinos and other services pay forum members to test their services and share their reviews. If you go through some of those campaign threads and read the reviews, you will see that many of them focus on the negative points and the features that need to be added or improved more than just praising the service.

That's the difference and Joyce might not have been aware of the forum review campaigns and how it's being done, where the manager pays members not to praise the casino but to try the casino and give their honest review, not like some shillings jobs and review platform where the casino will have to review what their paid reviewer are doing what ever don't pass review don't get published here even when members are not paid they still test to verify what was said by others if the casino is actually same way it's being praised to be.

The forum members are only interested in genuine reviews and not something that will affect the actual experience of a player from writing what they faced using a casino instead of praising the casino for not being honest with their words.
This forum is different from all other forums that can lie to cover the truth about a casino that is busy treating players anyhow.

Quote from: CryptSafe on September 18, 2026, 12:21:02 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on September 17, 2026, 12:11:04 AM

And that’s exactly the misconception most gamblers have and fail to understand. Just because you know a lot about sports (skilled) doesn’t necessarily mean you will earn more from sports betting than from casino games.
The trick here is that regardless of how skilled you are, you need to understand that the odds provider knows more than you do and, in most cases, they get inside information that you don’t have access to. That’s how they can set the odds for the events in a way that makes them always in their favor.

You are right, this point you have raised is what many players fail to understand. Odds providers act on information since they are very close to the sports cycle and in such cases, they would be very careful to not make any mistake on themselves not to make any losses. Even when match is still live, haven't you also noticed that they also change odds? While game is ongoing they change odds if I am not mistaken because I have experienced it for sometime now while game is live.

One trap many gamblers fall for is believing that somehow, sports betting is easier or safer than casino games because they know so much about sports especially football.

Bookmakers are wiser than you think they are. They have all the details and data feeds of every game, that's why they you see the odds moving up and down during live games. They move the odds to protect their margins so they don't end up on the loss side regardless of the outcome of the game.