Last update: 2026-11-03_Tue_23.24h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

khaled0111 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. khaled0111
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none

Username "khaled0111" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 67308658 (unedited backup) (by Kavelj22) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 23:20:31 CET 2026) in اختراق بينانس- أكتوبر 2026:
Quote from: khaled0111 on November 02, 2026, 10:55:15 PM
هذه ليست المرة الاولى التي تتعرض فيها بايناص لاختراق كبير و تقوم بتعويض المتضررين و تتكفل بتغطية الاموال المسروقة من اموالها الخاصة. لم تمر فترة طويلة على الاختراق السابق و اتذكر انهم رفظوا عروض لمساعدتهم في تعويض الضحايا وقتها..

هذه المرة ليست ككل مرة لأن حجم الخسارة ضخم جدا لدرجة ان الودائع على SAFU لا تكفي و اضطروا لاستخدام الأموال الخاصة للمنصة. اذا كان هناك من هو مستعد لمساعدة بينانس فالأكيد هي اليوم تحتاج لذلك أكثر من أي وقت مضى. العمليات السابقة كانت الخسائر لا تتجاوز عدة ملايين من الدولارات. أما اليوم فالرقم يتجاوز ميزانيات بعض الدول مجتمعة. أضف الى ذلك الكم الهائل من السحوبات التي عليهم اتمامها و لا ننسى ان تعويض كل هذه النفقات سيتطلب وقتا اكبر اذا تم الاعتماد على الايرادان العادية للمنصة لأن عدد المستخدمين لابد أنه تراجع بعد ان غادر العديد منهم المنصة و خفض الباقي مدخراته عليها.

في اخر التحديثات بخصوص الحادثة فانه بعد ما وجهت وكالة الاستخبارات الفدرالية الأمريكية FBI التهمة مباشرة لكوريا الشمالية بالضلوع خلف عملية التعليق، فقد نفت كوريا الشمالية تلك التهم واصفة اياها بالسخبفة و الرامية الى تشويه صورة بيونغ يانغ: https://www.reuters.com/ar/business/G2PMEWBK7VOQHG3TVI63RPEH54-2026-11-02/


2. Post 67305738 (unedited backup) (by frogbetcom) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 08:11:13 CET 2026) in Frogbet.com | 70+ Provably Fair Originals | Instant Withdrawals | VIP Transfer:
Quote from: Jaycoinz on November 01, 2026, 06:53:30 PM
Quote from: Haunebu on October 31, 2026, 06:17:50 AM
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2026, 09:59:21 PM
Sorry Haunebu but I have to disagree with you on this.
If a casino has solid evidence that prove that a user created multiple accounts to cheat its system, then it is within its rights to confiscate his winnings (casinos usually state that in their terms). It may sound unfair for some people, but it’s definitely not stealing.
I understand why you are saying that. You believe he is fortunate because they allowed him to withdraw his money after he got caught cheating. But this doesn’t mean seizing cheaters’ funds is stealing.
In this particular case, they obviously did not steal his funds because they reached the conclusion that he didn't cheat despite possessing multiple accounts which is where your points are totally valid. However, my point is that many sites go in the opposite direction.

A smart gambler never gives any casino(Offline and Online) an excuse to take their funds legitimately or illegitimately.

I get your point mate, well it turns out Frogbet is already on their way to being one of those shitty-ass casinos that probably don't have enough liquidity or came to scam users because the issue rising against them is starting to look too shady.

Am really curious about something, it's about casino that go through the long process to buy a domain, register and license their casinos, build the website interface, pay a whole lot for marketing, and then decides to scam users here over a some couple hundred of dollars, I really don't know how big the market space for them to gather up a lot of players but I feel most of the casino that go down this route don't actually get profits or am I missing something because am thinking the cost of starting a casino or even getting license, they must have presented a certain bankroll to get that so why then scam?

Unsure where these claims are coming from. We have a 100% win rate against all claims with ADRs, Casino Guru, and Askgamblers across all brands and have paid out over $1,000,000 in wins which anyone can verify on-chain.


3. Post 67305322 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 02:47:19 CET 2026) in ماذا بعد سرقة محافظ البيتكوين:
Quote from: khaled0111 link=topic=5590666.msg67305195#msg67305195 date=1793490063 date=1793662863
فالمستخدمون يتحملون المسؤولية لاكبر لعدم التحديث للاصدار الاخير كما طلب منهم

الناس الذين لم يتم تحديثهم، نعم، هم مسؤولون جزئيًا على الأقل. ومع ذلك، فإن لغة BTCPay الخاصة في الإفصاح الأصلي ("العملاء الذين لا يستخدمون LND لا يتأثرون بتسرب البيانات في LND" + "نوصي جميع العملاء بالتحديث") كانت مفهومة بشكل معقول لتعني أن مستخدمي LND فقط هم المعرضون للخطر. من جانبي، سأميل إلى الموافقة على أنه ليس مضللاً بشكل صارخ.

لا أعرف، لا أعتقد أن أي شخص يمكن أن يستنتج بشكل معقول أن محافظهم الساخنة على السلاسل العادية كانت معرضة للخطر بسبب هذه الصياغة. وأوافق على أن الأشخاص الذين يشغلون برامج معروفة بأنها ضعيفة يستحقون جزءًا كبيرًا من اللوم، لكنني أيضًا لا أعتقد أن الصياغة التي استخدمتها BTCPay في أغسطس كانت مضللة بشكل صارخ.

أوضحت BTCPay لاحقًا أن الإصدارات الأقل من 2.4.2 كانت ضعيفة، ولكن ذلك كان بعد فوات الأوان، ولم يوضحوا بعد ما إذا كانت نفس المشكلة أم لا.


4. Post 67304772 (unedited backup) (by moneroarena) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 22:03:49 CET 2026) in 🔥 MONEROARENA.COM - Provably fair PvP minigames - Play against real people 🔥:
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2026, 10:53:02 PM
I like retro-style casinos and I have nothing against that, but to be honest, I think you can do better.
I understand that you want to emphasize the retro look, but I think you are pushing it too far when users can no longer distinguish between regular text and buttons or clickable links. I understand that this is hard to achieve but you need to find a balance between the retro aspect and the ease of use.

Hello khaled,

Sorry for my late reply. You were right, the original retro design had some flaws, that made it a bit confusing.
We have updated our user interface and also made some improvements to the games. We’d love to hear your opinion on the new design!



NEW GAME ADDED: MINES (multiple modes, provably fair, PvP)


5. Post 67301706 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 02:44:13 CET 2026) in  [تقرير شهري] ملخص حركة نقاط الجدارة (Merits) في الق:
ملخص نقاط الجدارة الشهري - القسم العربي
شهر أكتوبر 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته،

★ أعلى 3 أعضاء في إرسال نقاط الجدارة (Merit Senders) ★


إليكم الرسوم البيانية الخاصة بمرسلي نقاط الجدارة:


جدول أعلى مرسلي نقاط الجدارة - أكتوبر

RankUsernameMerits Sent
1OmegaStarScream16
2hugeblack13
3khaled01119
4GxSTxV6
5mikeywith4
6yhiaali34
7Kavelj223
8ObeyKnock3
9DireWolfM142

---

★ أعلى 3 أعضاء في استلام نقاط الجدارة (Merit Receivers) ★


إليكم الرسوم البيانية الخاصة بمستلمي نقاط الجدارة:



جدول أعلى مستلمي نقاط الجدارة - أكتوبر

RankUsernameMerits Received
1OmegaStarScream20
2Kavelj2218
3ObeyKnock10
4yhiaali36
5hugeblack3
6khaled01112
7Zwei1



6. Post 67300613 (unedited backup) (by Jaycoinz) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 19:53:31 CET 2026) in Frogbet.com | 70+ Provably Fair Originals | Instant Withdrawals | VIP Transfer:
Quote from: Haunebu on October 31, 2026, 06:17:50 AM
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2026, 09:59:21 PM
Sorry Haunebu but I have to disagree with you on this.
If a casino has solid evidence that prove that a user created multiple accounts to cheat its system, then it is within its rights to confiscate his winnings (casinos usually state that in their terms). It may sound unfair for some people, but it’s definitely not stealing.
I understand why you are saying that. You believe he is fortunate because they allowed him to withdraw his money after he got caught cheating. But this doesn’t mean seizing cheaters’ funds is stealing.
In this particular case, they obviously did not steal his funds because they reached the conclusion that he didn't cheat despite possessing multiple accounts which is where your points are totally valid. However, my point is that many sites go in the opposite direction.

A smart gambler never gives any casino(Offline and Online) an excuse to take their funds legitimately or illegitimately.

I get your point mate, well it turns out Frogbet is already on their way to being one of those shitty-ass casinos that probably don't have enough liquidity or came to scam users because the issue rising against them is starting to look too shady.

Am really curious about something, it's about casino that go through the long process to buy a domain, register and license their casinos, build the website interface, pay a whole lot for marketing, and then decides to scam users here over a some couple hundred of dollars, I really don't know how big the market space for them to gather up a lot of players but I feel most of the casino that go down this route don't actually get profits or am I missing something because am thinking the cost of starting a casino or even getting license, they must have presented a certain bankroll to get that so why then scam.


7. Post 67298671 (unedited backup) (by ObeyKnock) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 04:47:56 CET 2026) in ملخص مشاركات القسم العربي الشهري:
ملخص المشاركات الشهري - القسم العربي
شهر أكتوبر 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته،

في شهر أكتوبر بلغ إجمالي المشاركات في قسمنا العربي 211 مشاركة، أي أقل بـ11 مشاركة مقارنة بشهر سبتمبر.

دعونا نتحدث الآن عن أعلى 3 أعضاء من حيث عدد المشاركات:


دعونا الآن نستعرض الرسوم البيانية التي تغطي جميع أعضاء القسم العربي الذين شاركوا هذا الشهر.


كما أنشأت مخططاً دائرياً (Pie Chart) يوضح نسبة مساهمة كل عضو، وإليكم المخطط:


وهذا جدول يوضح أعلى 10 أعضاء نشاطاً هذا الشهر:

RankUsernamePost Count
1ObeyKnock52
2khaled011143
3Kavelj2235
4yhiaali326
5GxSTxV13
6OmegaStarScream12
7hugeblack8
8Zwei3
9RedFlix3
10Baristotle3


8. Post 67298463 (unedited backup) (by Donneski) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 00:32:08 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2026, 11:37:46 PM
Quote from: Bushdark on October 30, 2026, 06:30:19 PM
...
I think I got what you are trying to say and you are probablyright. They most likely got paid to list this exchange on their website and to promote it and that’s probably why they can't just delist it. They simply chose to remain silent and pretend they haven't noticed forum users' complaints. But once the deal is over, they will delist the exchange and come back here and claim they were away and weren’t aware of the allegations against the exchange.
More like they do consciously feign ignorance to the complaints of forum users until they're sure that they've completed their own part of the deal, delist them and come back to the forum acting like they're just waking up from sleep. And I ask, can't something be done about it? Isn't that malicious enough to attract little sanctions as a way of protecting the interest of the community?


9. Post 67296409 (unedited backup) (by arwin100) (scraped on Sat Oct 31 13:42:07 CET 2026) in Frogbet.com | 70+ Provably Fair Originals | Instant Withdrawals | VIP Transfer:
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2026, 09:59:21 PM
Quote from: Haunebu on October 30, 2026, 01:35:55 PM
..
Sorry Haunebu but I have to disagree with you on this.
If a casino has solid evidence that prove that a user created multiple accounts to cheat its system, then it is within its rights to confiscate his winnings (casinos usually state that in their terms). It may sound unfair for some people, but it’s definitely not stealing.
I understand why you are saying that. You believe he is fortunate because they allowed him to withdraw his money after he got caught cheating. But this doesn’t mean seizing cheaters’ funds is stealing.

But actually, its also good for the casino to show proof that the user commits violation in their casino.

Since if they left a statement stating that the user commits violation, this will leave some negative conclusion that maybe the casino just do a selective scamming.

If they can also present their defense, then all of those people following those case will get satisfied on their findings. Then no further questions will be asked.


10. Post 67296306 (unedited backup) (by DabsPoorVersion) (scraped on Sat Oct 31 13:01:13 CET 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
Quote from: Renampun on October 30, 2026, 10:05:07 PM
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 29, 2026, 10:40:02 PM
So, allowing newbies to participate in these contests and promotions is not a bad idea as long as the casino has its own ways to detect cheaters, which I believe Vega.bet has.
So, I don’t think this is going to be an issue here.

CM should also understand that, and Vega surely does reviews before deciding whether a user is eligible for that reward.. They also wouldn't just give out rewards randomly, they definitely have assessed the account and made sure there's no activity that violates their terms of service before depositing the reward into the winner’s account.. That's also not difficult for them because they have a system that can detect that. So I agree with you that there really shouldn’t be an issue here.
That's something that is not confirmed on Vega Bet part. Since what we usually see at the end of each weekly event is only the breakdown of the scores of each participant and nothing more than that. But then again, Royse knows exactly what he needs to do. It's his responsibility to ensure that no one will abuse the event and spoil the fun. We know for sure he has his own ways to avoid that.


A few more hours left before the start of the match for our Vega Bet weekly event.
There's still time left to submit new entries.
It was surprising to see more people and new names joining now. Good luck everyone!


11. Post 67296053 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Oct 31 11:01:55 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
   245. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   246. 430390: psycodad (Trust:  neutral) (2556 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   247. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   248. 454323: Raimonn (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   249. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   250. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   251. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (6403 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   252. 502704: zimbo123 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   253. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   254. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   255. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +60 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   256. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (780 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   257. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (880 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   258. 529564: hymperion (Trust:  neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   259. 532686: nimogsm (Trust:  neutral) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   260. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1093 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   261. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   262. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   263. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1070 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   264. 549786: $crypto$ (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (766 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   265. 551460: swogerino (Trust:  neutral) (265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   266. 553678: Mr. Big (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (231 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   267. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust:  neutral) (837 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   268. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   269. 558138: elokk (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (19 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   270. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust:  neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   271. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   272. 579628: bob123 (Trust:  neutral) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   273. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   274. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   275. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   276. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   277. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   278. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   279. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   280. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   281. 751988: Taskford (Trust:  neutral) (576 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   282. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   283. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: #  +13 / =1 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   284. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust:  neutral) (92 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   285. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (709 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   286. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   287. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust:  neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   288. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (231 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   289. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (1017 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   290. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (121 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   291. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   292. 821689: Russlenat (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (596 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   293. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   294. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (463 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   295. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2400 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   296. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +65 / =1 / -1) (2776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   297. 843320: Komosa (Trust:  neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   298. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust:  neutral) (1739 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   299. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (3077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   300. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   301. 857883: Yatsan (Trust: +3 / =5 / -0) (764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   302. 867786: HCP (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   303. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   304. 878630: TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (986 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   305. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust:  neutral) (2617 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   306. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +136 / =4 / -0) (6943 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   307. 881799: altcoinb (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   308. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust:  neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   309. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   310. 885934: SamReomo (Trust:  neutral) (742 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   311. 886369: michellee (Trust:  neutral) (410 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   312. 886521: mk4 (Trust:  neutral) (3647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   313. 888099: finaleshot2016 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (933 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   314. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   315. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1855 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   316. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   317. 898928: Theb (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   318. 900408: spirits (Trust:  neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   319. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1287 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   320. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (3738 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   321. 910236: Woodie (Trust:  neutral) (901 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   322. 911663: sompitonov (Trust:  neutral) (1259 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   323. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1321 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   324. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (656 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   325. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   326. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   327. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust:  neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   328. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   329. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (175 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   330. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   331. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   332. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1540 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   333. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1504 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   334. 961708: dittoup (Trust:  neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   335. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   336. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   337. 965120: celeborne (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   338. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (816 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   339. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   340. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   341. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3818 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   342. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   343. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust:  neutral) (7648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   344. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +79 / =1 / -0) (4312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   345. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   346. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (3393 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   347. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   348. 1015954: aundroid (Trust:  neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   349. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   350. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   351. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   352. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5813 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   353. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2035 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   354. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   355. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust:  neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   356. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2729 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   357. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +25 / =2 / -0) (15771 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   358. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (3109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   359. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


12. Post 67295602 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Sat Oct 31 07:17:50 CET 2026) in Frogbet.com | 70+ Provably Fair Originals | Instant Withdrawals | VIP Transfer:
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2026, 09:59:21 PM
Sorry Haunebu but I have to disagree with you on this.
If a casino has solid evidence that prove that a user created multiple accounts to cheat its system, then it is within its rights to confiscate his winnings (casinos usually state that in their terms). It may sound unfair for some people, but it’s definitely not stealing.
I understand why you are saying that. You believe he is fortunate because they allowed him to withdraw his money after he got caught cheating. But this doesn’t mean seizing cheaters’ funds is stealing.
In this particular case, they obviously did not steal his funds because they reached the conclusion that he didn't cheat despite possessing multiple accounts which is where your points are totally valid. However, my point is that many sites go in the opposite direction.

A smart gambler never gives any casino(Offline and Online) an excuse to take their funds legitimately or illegitimately.


13. Post 67294897 (unedited backup) (by Renampun) (scraped on Fri Oct 30 23:05:07 CET 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 29, 2026, 10:40:02 PM
So, allowing newbies to participate in these contests and promotions is not a bad idea as long as the casino has its own ways to detect cheaters, which I believe Vega.bet has.
So, I don’t think this is going to be an issue here.

CM should also understand that, and Vega surely does reviews before deciding whether a user is eligible for that reward.. They also wouldn't just give out rewards randomly, they definitely have assessed the account and made sure there's no activity that violates their terms of service before depositing the reward into the winner’s account.. That's also not difficult for them because they have a system that can detect that. So I agree with you that there really shouldn’t be an issue here.


14. Post 67294134 (unedited backup) (by Bushdark) (scraped on Fri Oct 30 19:30:19 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :


I have seen the option for crypto platforms that want to get listed on Notokyc platform and I am beginning to think that the El Capo instant exchange may have paid for getting listed that is why the team is taking time to delist the exchange.
What do you think may have been the reason?

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 29, 2026, 10:59:26 PM
I really don’t get why NoKYC didn’t delist this scam casino from their website and choose to put their own reputation at risk! Since it’s a scam casino, they are unlikely to pay them their owed referral commissions. What’s the point of promoting a scam for free, what do they gain from that (unless there is a deal under the table that we aren't aware of)?
When was the last time they updated their website (nokyc), btw?


15. Post 67293189 (unedited backup) (by Agbamoni) (scraped on Fri Oct 30 14:50:14 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
Quote from: Wakate on Today at 04:14:09 AM
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 29, 2026, 10:59:26 PM
I really don’t get why NoKYC didn’t delist this scam casino from their website and choose to put their own reputation at risk! Since it’s a scam casino, they are unlikely to pay them their owed referral commissions. What’s the point of promoting a scam for free, what do they gain from that (unless there is a deal under the table that we aren't aware of)?
When was the last time they updated their website (nokyc), btw?
They can not tell us that they are not aware of the scam and notifications about the complaints that have been going on here.
But I will still find a way to contact the team of the Notokyc team because I see it as a important update to let them know in case they will want to give excuses about not being aware of what's happening. The delay can be dangerous in this kind of situation to prevent the woser cases from happening.

Let's take a moment to also understand from the platform's POV. Automatic delisting because of a complaint is not a vague reason to delist the casino from their platform. However, what they should have done is indicate a warning sign at the top right of the casino on their platform to let visitors know that the casino is under review and cannot be trusted entirely. Lack of communication has been the problem here. No KYC and staying mute are not encouraging visitors to their platform.


16. Post 67292324 (unedited backup) (by OmegaStarScream) (scraped on Fri Oct 30 09:36:08 CET 2026) in سرقة +84 مليون دولار محفظة Ledger:
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 13, 2026, 11:59:02 PM
ما الذي يعنيه هذا الخبر اخي اوميغا؟ هل هذا يعني ان اي جهاز يمكن ان يكون مفخخا (في انتظار ان يتم الكشف عنها) او ان هناك اصدارات معينة معنية بهذا الاختراق.

أعتذر عن التأخر في الرد. نعم، هذا يعني أنه عكس ما كان يظنه البعض، نماذج Ledger Nano ليس هي وحدها التي تم تفخيخها.
على أي حال: ما كنا نخشاه، لقد أكدت Trezor منذ قليل أن أحد الأجهزة التي تم شراءها من نفس البائع (CryptoBillis) هي أيضا فيها جهاز للتجسس. لكن ماهذا لا يوجد أي تقارير حول خسارة أي مستخدم لأمواله[1]

[1] https://trezor.io/blog/news/implant-reported-in-a-trezor-sold-by-cryptobilis


17. Post 67291916 (unedited backup) (by Wakate) (scraped on Fri Oct 30 05:14:13 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 29, 2026, 10:59:26 PM
I really don’t get why NoKYC didn’t delist this scam casino from their website and choose to put their own reputation at risk! Since it’s a scam casino, they are unlikely to pay them their owed referral commissions. What’s the point of promoting a scam for free, what do they gain from that (unless there is a deal under the table that we aren't aware of)?
When was the last time they updated their website (nokyc), btw?
They can not tell us that they are not aware of the scam and notifications about the complaints that have been going on here.
But I will still find a way to contact the team of the Notokyc team because I see it as a important update to let them know in case they will want to give excuses about not being aware of what's happening. The delay can be dangerous in this kind of situation to prevent the woser cases from happening.


18. Post 67291460 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Thu Oct 29 23:45:55 CET 2026) in Vega Bet Crypto Casino No KYC, Instant | 150FS no deposit bonus Limited time:
Quote from: Frankolala on Today at 10:38:08 PM
Quote from: PX-Z on Today at 09:43:45 PM
Simply because accepting newbie participants has higher chance that there could be cheating or multi accounting, just like you said. Yes, those can be traced if there really is, but that could make long observation and investigation from the casino to tell if there really is multiaccounting. Also, it's a rule probably discussed and agreed by the manager and from casino team, so its still their jurisdiction to do so.
You don't need to be worried about multi accounts cheating because since, the casino is aware about this, they will definitely, fish out those that are using multi accounts to cheat through their IP address and they will be given negative tag. A similar case like this happened in the forum on bonus and the guy abuse it by creating a new account to for bonus. The casino was the one who caught him and brought it up here. This the reason why I think newbies can also join without any restrictions.
Yeah, participation of the casino to identify those multiaccounting users is very helpful. But as for cheating detection, a sole ip address for reference of multiaccounting is not enough and is not reliable, it should be based on browsers, device, platform, screens, login behaviours, games, etc.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:40:02 PM
Quote from: PX-Z on Today at 09:43:45 PM
...
The main aim from hosting promotions and contests is to encourage current users to play more, which helps in building a community of loyal players and, most importantly, attract new users who may turn into loyal customers as well. So, allowing newbies to participate in these contests and promotions is not a bad idea as long as the casino has its own ways to detect cheaters, which I believe Vega.bet has.
So, I don’t think this is going to be an issue here.
Well, that really make sense if this is the case. But maybe add some requirements aside from being just a newbie, maybe some X posts, and etc.


19. Post 67288961 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Thu Oct 29 11:15:31 CET 2026) in تحديث محفظة الكتروم:
Quote from: khaled0111 on October 28, 2026, 12:32:59 AM
^^
لا اعلم اخوتي، لكن حسب ما قراته و ما فهمته، فإن السيرفر الشخصي يمكن ان يكون الحل هنا.
فقط لنركز على هذه الحالة بالذات بدون ان نركز على اي حالة اخرى، هل هناك اي امكانية لاستغلال هذه الثغرة لاختراق شخص يستعمل سيرفره الخاص؟ لا اعتقد ان ذلك ممكن في هذه الحالة و لذلك ركزت عل  ضرورة استخدام السيرفر الشخصي، رغم ان ذلك ليس متوفرا لكل المستخدمين، للاسف.
مجددا، انا احكي من الجانب التقني.
ان كان شخص ما سيستخدم سيرفر شخصي فلا اعتقد انه سيقوم باستخدام محفظة الكتروم وهو انتقاص من فكرة SPV wallets حيث لا يزال يحتاج الكثيرين لادارة عقدة كاملة لامان عملاتهم وليست لخصوصية تلك العملات.

التحديث كافي في الوقت الراهن ولكن ان استمرت هكذا هجمات في النجاح فسيكون من الضرورية ادارةعقدةكاملة لاسباب الخصوصية والامان معا


20. Post 67287156 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Wed Oct 28 20:11:31 CET 2026) in سحوبات مونيرو على منصة كراكن:
Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 12:58:39 AM
^^
الى حد الان لست قادرا على استيعاب كيف يمكن لمنصة مركزية ان تقبل التعامل بعملات تدعم الخصوصية! هذا لا يبدو مقبولا، للامانة، الا ان كانت تلك المنصات تعمل للاطاحة بمن يستخدم هذذه العملات و تسعى لكشف هويتهم.
منصة مركزية تطلب توثيق الهوية و تدعم عملة مجعولة اساسا لاخفاء الهوية.. للامانة اجد صعوبة في فهم هذه التركيبة!
الامر محير شيئا ما نظرا للضغوط التي كانت تمارسها السلطات سابقا (واعتقد لا تزال تمارسها على جميع المنصات) لازالة مونيرو وعدم ادراجها مجددا.
من غير المستبعد ان يكون لدى كراكن اتفاقا خلف الكواليس مع الساطات لابقاء مونيرو مدرجة ليتمكنوا من تتبع الاشخاص الذين يستخدمونها وجمع المعلومات عنهم.

القضية فيها ان.


21. Post 67285695 (unedited backup) (by OmegaStarScream) (scraped on Wed Oct 28 13:00:20 CET 2026) in سحوبات مونيرو على منصة كراكن:
Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 08:31:37 AM
Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 12:58:39 AM
منصة مركزية تطلب توثيق الهوية و تدعم عملة مجعولة اساسا لاخفاء الهوية.. للامانة اجد صعوبة في فهم هذه التركيبة!
ان كان دعم هذه المنصات سيوفر لهم ارباح وتحقيق المزيد من المستخدمين مع الحفاظ علي علاقات جيدة مع السلطات كونهم يتعاونو معهم واي ايداع سيقومون بتجميده فحتما ستكون دعم المونيرو هي الخيار الافضل خصوصا وان لها بعض الاستخدامات حيث يستخدمها الصحفيين وغيرهم في الدفع وبالتالي وبدلا من ان تكون هناك منصات غير مسجلة في الولايات المتحدة تدعمها فلا باس من كون وجود منصة تراقبها الحكومة.

كما لا ننسي انه عندما يسألون عن ماذا ستفعل بها سيقوم البعض بالجواب مباشرةكون ان هؤلاء الاشخاص لا يهتمون اصلا بالخصوصية وبعضهم يشتريها لسبب استثماري بحت

صراحة حتى و ان أخذنا الأرباح بعين الاعتبار فهي ليس بالشئ الكبير...

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/kraken/

حجم تداول العملة في منصة كراكن لا يتجاوز عشر ملايين دولار (بعد جمل كل من USDT/XMR و XMR/USD) يعني هذا لا يمثل حتى 1 بالمئة من حجم التداول الاجمالي. هل يعتبر و الذي في رأيي هو حجم غير معتبر خاصة و ان كان سوف يسبب صداع رأس من المنظمين.

لا أدري ماهو الأمر بالتحديد و أنا لا أتهم المنصة  بأش شئ، لكن مازالت أعتقد أنه يوجد للأمر اكثر مما هو ظاهر لنا.




22. Post 67285144 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Wed Oct 28 09:31:37 CET 2026) in سحوبات مونيرو على منصة كراكن:
Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 12:58:39 AM
منصة مركزية تطلب توثيق الهوية و تدعم عملة مجعولة اساسا لاخفاء الهوية.. للامانة اجد صعوبة في فهم هذه التركيبة!
ان كان دعم هذه المنصات سيوفر لهم ارباح وتحقيق المزيد من المستخدمين مع الحفاظ علي علاقات جيدة مع السلطات كونهم يتعاونو معهم واي ايداع سيقومون بتجميده فحتما ستكون دعم المونيرو هي الخيار الافضل خصوصا وان لها بعض الاستخدامات حيث يستخدمها الصحفيين وغيرهم في الدفع وبالتالي وبدلا من ان تكون هناك منصات غير مسجلة في الولايات المتحدة تدعمها فلا باس من كون وجود منصة تراقبها الحكومة.

كما لا ننسي انه عندما يسألون عن ماذا ستفعل بها سيقوم البعض بالجواب مباشرةكون ان هؤلاء الاشخاص لا يهتمون اصلا بالخصوصية وبعضهم يشتريها لسبب استثماري بحت


23. Post 67283832 (unedited backup) (by PauloKoner) (scraped on Tue Oct 27 21:28:07 CET 2026) in Goated.com 🐐 | The #1 Crypto Casino | Sports | VIP Transfer✨| Rewards 🎁:
Quote from: khaled0111 on September 24, 2026, 11:37:00 PM
^^
Please stop this discussion about Goated loans if you didn’t even bother to read the terms on how to get them. Getting a loan from Goated has nothing to do with trust and it certainly has nothing to do with the loans you can get from a bank, they have nothing in common.
Please read Zwei's reply to understand how Goated loan service works.
I'm really surprised to see many members (who are supposed to be legendaries) arguing about something they don’t even understand how it works.

I think Goated really hit the mark with this feature. It got a lot of attention and brought traffic to the site and got people talking about their name. Smart move on their part..

The main thing is that everyone figured it out in the end.