What you just said is correct , people speak up their minds here ,any experience they get , they don’t hide it especially how it makes them feel , before I joined this forum , I have seen different casino advert on X which I tried out and it didn’t go well as expected , I saw so many reviews which I got disappointed after my first attempt, , these forum is a big community that has different people and their experience, so I trust most reviews here than other platforms,  the few i tried out here when I join , was nice , even this recent one it’s amazing and unique and I will urge people to try it out , the easy deposit and Instant withdrawal with sweet bonus .

   262. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   263. 407112: deathdealer1252 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   264. 407892: micromen (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   265. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   266. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   267. 430390: psycodad (Trust:  neutral) (2367 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   268. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   269. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1530 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   270. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3902 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   271. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   272. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   273. 507015: BtcCrazy1 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   274. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   275. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +61 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   276. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   277. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +33 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   278. 529564: hymperion (Trust:  neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   279. 531201: d4rkwizard (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   280. 532686: nimogsm (Trust:  neutral) (153 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   281. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (6225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   282. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1024 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   283. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1642 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   284. 543626: jackg (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2074 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   285. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   286. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1026 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   287. 551460: swogerino (Trust:  neutral) (260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   288. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust:  neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   289. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +7 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   290. 553678: Mr. Big (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   291. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust:  neutral) (692 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   292. 558138: elokk (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (19 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   293. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust:  neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   294. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   295. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5058 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   296. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   297. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   298. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   299. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   300. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   301. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   302. 689964: RariBest (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   303. 705593: gt_addict (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (124 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   304. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   305. 740502: condoras (Trust: +15 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   306. 751988: Taskford (Trust:  neutral) (527 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   307. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (551 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   308. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: #  +15 / =2 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   309. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust:  neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   310. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   311. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   312. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust:  neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   313. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +6 / =6 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   314. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (230 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   315. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (1011 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   316. 815246: Murat (Trust: +11 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   317. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   318. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   319. 821689: Russlenat (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   320. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   321. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1977 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   322. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   323. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   324. 843320: Komosa (Trust:  neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   325. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust:  neutral) (1657 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   326. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (2587 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   327. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   328. 857883: Yatsan (Trust: +3 / =5 / -0) (764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   329. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   330. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   331. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   332. 878630: TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (947 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   333. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +139 / =4 / -0) (6596 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   334. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust:  neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   335. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   336. 885934: SamReomo (Trust:  neutral) (571 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   337. 886369: michellee (Trust:  neutral) (409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   338. 886521: mk4 (Trust:  neutral) (3646 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   339. 888099: finaleshot2016 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (933 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   340. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1850 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   341. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   342. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   343. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   344. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +37 / =1 / -0) (3589 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   345. 910236: Woodie (Trust:  neutral) (861 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   346. 911663: sompitonov (Trust:  neutral) (1224 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   347. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   348. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   349. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   350. 926962: xLays (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (439 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   351. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   352. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   353. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust:  neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   354. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   355. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   356. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (93 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   357. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   358. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   359. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (1249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   360. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +15 / =5 / -0) (1158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   361. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1199 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   362. 961708: dittoup (Trust:  neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   363. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1086 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   364. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   365. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   366. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   367. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (1356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   368. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   369. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   370. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust:  neutral) (6571 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   371. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   372. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3238 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   373. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   374. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   375. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   376. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5173 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   377. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1821 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   378. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   379. 1046135: AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (470 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   380. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust:  neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   381. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   382. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (5132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

This should not be about how much the specific amounts could be but all maintaining safety while using a casino for the first time. Apart from checking for real reviews of a casino before using it, your experience with the casino is vital and if you make big deposit for the first time and you ended up not liking the casino, this can make you angry if you had already made a big deposit with a wagering requirement before removing your money. This is not a rule that needed to be followed but a simple way to stay at alert when using a casino for the first time.

بالنسبة لمؤيدات الادعاء في القضية فهي ستستند أساسا على التسجيلات الصوتية بين المدعى عليها و اختها و التي تثبت تورطهما في القيام بالسرقة و محاولتهما التصرف في المسروقات، و الا كيف يمكن معرفة انها بدقة استعملت كاميرات المراقبة. ايضا هناك شهادة أخت الضحية التي كانت أول من نبههوالى نوايا زوجته قبل أن تحصل السرقة. الرابط الذي نشرته يفسر كل اركان الادعاء لكنه فقط طويل و ممل بما انه مكتوب بصبغة قانونية. عموما حتى لو تمكن محاموا المدعى عليها من اثبات بطلان الادعاء بالسرقة من زوجها فانها لن تنجو من اتهام القضاء لها بمحاولة غسيل الاموال و الاثراء غير المشروع و تهم أخرى يمكن تكييفها حسب ما يمكن اثباته من التسجيلات الصوتية.

بالنسبة لنقطة التسوية فانها حسب رأيي أفضل الحلول. التسوية يعني أن يجلس محامو الطرفين و يحاولان الوصول الى تسوية بصيغة متفق عليها. مثلا ان يتراجع الزوج عن القضية مقابل استعادة نصف المبلغ او نسبة معينة منه، او ان ترجع الزوجة المسروقات مقابل تراجع الزوج في اقواله التي تدينها بشكل او باخر مع تغطية التكاليف و ما الى ذلك.
لماذا التسوية هي افضل الحلول؟ ببساطة لان القضية في المحكمة ستؤدي الى احدى النتيجتين. اما ان تثبت التهم بحق الزوجة و تذهب الى السجن مع رفضها ارجاع المبلغ (لا معنى لارجاع المبلغ ان كانت مدانة بكل الاحوال) و بالنالي الزوج لن يستفيد شيئا فقد ضاعت امواله بكل الاحوال، و اما ان تعيد الزوجة المبلغ و يتم اسقاط التهم بادعاء ان التسجيلات كانت مجرد دردشة صوتية مثلا و هنا سيفتح باب جديد مع السلطات لاثبات مصادر البيتكوين و ربما يتم اتهام الزوج بتهم تتعلق بغسيل الاموال او ما شابه. كلا السيناريوات لا يخدمان مصلحة الطرفين لذلك من الأفضل ان يجلس الطرفان على طاولة التفاوض قبل الوقوف امام القاضي و ان يصلا الى اتفاق باخف الاضرار للجميع.

طبعا كل هذا قراءة شخصية مني و ربما اكون مخطئا بالتقديرات لانني لست على علم بجميع حيثيات القضية و لا بالقانون البريطاني. الموضوع ايضا متاح للنقاش في القسم الانقليزي لمن يريد متابعة التطورات:

Since it was a notice from Winna, you can still reach out to them. Honestly, it is incredible from Winna because not all casinos will come up with this to refund gamers.

I think this is the kind of trait that users expect from casinos because it gives one the comfort to stick to a good casino like this. I really fancy the brand that Winna is building, showing a good concern for gamers and that's how thing is supposed to be done.

I think the ideal would be to have some official activity here for promotion. They should start considering the forum as a social network that receives marketing campaigns and information, just like X or any other social network.

 
That's a lot of money for features we may never use.

Let's see how that stacks up:

Unstoppable is a phone wallet.  No one should be storing their entire stash in a phone wallet, and if handing over the $200 worth of coins I keep in my hot wallet saves me from getting knee caps smashed by $5 wrench, so long $200 worth of coins, that's only one year of subscribing and you may never need to worry about it for your entire life.  At least one can pray you'll never need it. 


How often do you send money to drug dealers, hookers, and terrorists?  Okay, don't answer that, but if you do send money to drug dealers, hookers, or terrorists you probably know you're doing it.  You don't need to pay your wallet to remind you you're doing it.


Meh.

---

Anyway, to answer the OP's original question; I use Electrum (mobile and desktop,) Bitcoin Core, and sometimes Sparrow.  For alts I use the official Monero wallet for desktop, and Moneroju on mobile.

Hi, everyone!
I’d like to share my personal opinion.
If participants were active and made a significant contribution to promoting cryptocurrencies, but currently cannot fully support the project for objective reasons, perhaps we could simply assign them a status like “temporarily suspended” or something similar. I think this would be a more lenient solution for people who have made a significant contribution to AOBT.
However, if we’re talking about people whose work was insignificant and inconsistent, then we could consider expelling them from the community.

I did play plinko during the mentioned time in Winna especially on December-January cant really remember if I was in a loss or profit.
Perhaps they should make an official statement related to this serious issue, at least they have the data about their own players who were affected and they should send an email to the affected users.
I do not want to ask them whether I'm one of the affected users, I'll wait if there will be someone who managed to contact them and get a refund due to this issue.

I support this too. I voted.

I guess this is what you mean right? Yesterday I was also confused about where to enter the code even on desktop. It took me a while to realize that the “Enter your code” text wasn’t very prominent. I’ve already sent a ticket to the team and I hope they will improve it or make it better.

maybe @bennettwinna should make a comment about this here to clarify things.

i don't think they did automated refunds, you need to contact their support to see if you were affected so you can get a refund.

from the looks of it, they didn't send the incident report email to everyone, some got it and some didn't.
if not for the tweet from @provablyfairorg a lot of people would still not be aware of this.

yeah, but it's a bit crazy that this was going on for almost 3 months.

- Hey, thanks for the detailed write-up, genuinely useful feedback. The Philippines block was a technical glitch on our side, not an intentional restriction. Philippines is not on our restricted list. It's fixed now.
On your suggestions:

• Direct prize delivery — fair point. Having players chase support to claim a giveaway win is not a great experience. We've noted it.
• Clearer list of restricted countries — also fair. We'll work on making that more visible on the site.
• Mirror site feedback — noted.

Glad you got your spins and were able to withdraw. Hope to see you back.


- Good questions.

"No withdrawal fees" means we don't add any fee on top of your transaction. You pay the blockchain network cost, that's the only deduction. We don't take a cut.
On bug bounty, nothing to announce right now. It's something we're aware of and have discussed, but no program is live yet. If that changes, we'll post about it publicly.


- That's a fair call-out. "No withdrawal fees" means no fee from our side, we don't add anything on top. The blockchain network cost still applies and the player covers that.

You're right that the current wording doesn't make that distinction clearly enough. We'll fix it.


- Thanks for the welcome.

On site speed, we're aware of it, it's on the list. Nothing to share on timing yet.

On fees, you read it correctly. No Minebit fee, just the blockchain network cost. We're going to make that clearer in the announcement and on the site so it doesn't create confusion.


- You're right that it's confusing. That tooltip is describing the blockchain network fee, not a Minebit fee. We don't charge anything on top. The problem is that context is missing from the tooltip, so it reads like we're the ones setting a variable fee.

We'll get that updated.

On popups, noted. The plan is to add notification preferences so players can control what they see. No release date yet, but it's on the roadmap.


- The Philippines access issue was a glitch, not a targeted restriction. It's been fixed, not just for your account, for the whole country. Philippines is not on our restricted list.

On popups, we hear you. Notification settings are planned so players can manage what shows up. No date yet but it's coming.

And thanks for sharing the ship updates here. Saves us a post.

Maybe Vega Bet needs to consider remapping the menu on the website. I am also facing a problem finding the menu I want to check or see. In most online casinos and online service websites that have a user dashboard page, all menus are usually shown in a drop down style in the top right corner. Like when you click your profile menu, you see most of the menus, important and frequently used menus.

On the Vega Bet website, there's a drop down menu, but it's limited to only 3 items, "Profile," "Settings," and "Exits." It’s a bit confusing when the placement of some frequently used features is scattered. Maybe place all personal related features in the top right corner, and game related features on the left sidebar if you still want to keep it.

Overall, I don't have any problems with games, transaction speed, etc. This menu remapping is also a subjective suggestion. It's based on my experience, behavior, and on how the majority of websites (casinos and other services) that I use are designed.

These suggestions are for the desktop version. For the mobile version, I think it's no problem because the menu is placed at the bottom as a bottom navigation bar.

Thank you for the heads up Porf, I would have missed the voting if you hadn't sent the PM.

Anyway, I remain at keeping everyone on board. If anyone wishes to leave willingly, let them, but if anyone underperforms, well that can be ignored for a while. Surely they had their reasons, but we shouldn't forget their past contributions.

As for inviting baseplate, I have already sent the answer through the voting poll.

Dear AoBTers,

It's that time of year when we evaluate the activity of our members and decide whether those who remain inactive should stay with us or abandon ship. You can cast your votes throughout the week here.

This time, the inactive members are mela65 (who, for personal reasons, won't have enough time to devote to translations this year and asked to leave, at least temporarily), Zwei and khaled0111. In case any of the mentioned members want to stay in the AOBT, speak now or forever hold your peace.

Agreed. The rep isn't the one who is the knowledge base of the product, but combined with others - he truly is

I think KYC verification is the only viable solution to block a person who opts to self-exclude himself from a casino and then opens a new account eventually.
I've heard it before that blocking an IP is an impractical solution, because a lot of things could go wrong if a casino is constantly doing it to red-flagged accounts or to people who self-exclude themselves. It could unintentionally block other people from using the casino just because a certain individual's IP address was blocked. Most residential internet users have dynamic IP addresses that change periodically, or if that person was using a public WiFi from a certain establishment, and of course, the VPN.
The casino does not want to lose any potential customers/players because they have been blocking a lot of IP addresses.

Did they issue refunds? I am sure I have played plinko this year (even if VERY limited) and I'm sure I didn't get anything back, at least not that I know of. Actually I wasn't even aware of the situation until today. 
Can we still see this report winna issued? I couldn't find it.
Obviously it's a good thing to be so upfront with their community, cause without winna telling them basically nobody would have known. Honesty is a very rare trait in this business.

نعم أخي ، المتيقنون هم الاشخاص الذين يؤمنون بفكرة البيتكوين و القيم التي بني عليها ولذلك نحن نسعى في مجتمع بيتكوين لنشر هذ المفاهيم ونشر هذه القيم وكلما كان الانتشار أوسع ستتغير هذه المفاهيم والقيم بشكل أسرع
المفاهيم تتغير مع الزمن وكذلك مع الظروف، على سبيل المثال في الأحوال العادية تعتبر العقارات نوع من الملاذ ال’م ويلجأ كثير من الناس للحفاظ على قيمة أصولهم من خلال شراء العقارات وتركها للزمن لكن في الحروب تصبح العقارات أسوأ ملاذ آمن وعلى العكس تصبح كارثة لأن أي صاروخ أو شظية ممكن أن تؤدي إلى تدميرها ويضيع كل شيء.
أوافق الأخ Kavelj22@ في مثاله حول الملاذ الآمن حيث كما ذكر "أن الملاذ الآمن لشركة بلاك روك التي يعد رأسمالها بالمليارات مختلف تماما عن مفهوم الملاذ الآمن لمواطن في غزة يمتلك مليون دولار و يريد ان ينقلها معها في وقت قصير الى الخارج قبل ان تصيبه رصاصة او شظية".
 
هذا صحيح تماما وبالتالي المفاهيم يمكن أن تتغير مع الزمن ومع الظروف.

This is not about Trustpilot itself, so in this context, it's valid. Did you read the 1 rating tag he claimed JP has on Trustpilot, from his manipulated link, while the actual rating is 4.4? That should tell you something already, aside from his known ignoble acts on the forum.

Looking at his post history it seems that its natural for him to accuse the casino he visit.

So I think we cannot really get any positive from him and it seems that he's enjoying throwing accusation against the casinos here in Bitcointalk.

For sure that those accusation he made won't stand and for sure that people will ignore it, people know how to determine those valid accusation and when to ignore those pure nonsense accusation.

I think it's always important to look at both the evidence and the reputation of the person making the accusation. Reviews on sites like Trustpilot can give some information, but they shouldn't be the only reference. After seeing his tag, it makes sense now. This kind of account is better to just ignore because he did not come here to give useful feedback, he just came here to spread negativity about the platform.

Some people are better ignored, bro. Posting a degrading link by yourself that immediately proves you wrong shows the kind of person you are and the mission you came for.

<<Read his tag>>

You raise a fair point. The “expected” amount cannot really be a fixed number because, as you said, players range from small bettors to high rollers with very different bankrolls. In practice, most systems do not look at a single amount but at patterns of behavior over time. This includes bet size relative to the account’s history, betting frequency, variance, win and loss cycles, and other indicators. The baseline is usually defined dynamically from a player’s own activity together with broader statistical models of normal play.

That said, I agree that relying only on behavioral expectations would be weak. Any detection system based purely on predictable thresholds can eventually be studied and imitated. That is why most modern anti-cheating or risk systems combine several layers such as statistical analysis, anomaly detection, timing patterns, device and network signals, and sometimes manual review. The goal is not just to check whether someone appears “normal” on the surface, but whether their behavior stays consistent across multiple dimensions.

So while a smart individual might try to mimic what the system expects, doing that consistently across all those signals becomes much harder in practice.

You are right.

Hi, Spinly. Do I receive the free spins? My post is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5544222.msg66509555#msg66509555 ending with 555

The website is also not working here. I am getting the same cloudflare error. Hopefull they fix it soon

اعتبار البيتكوين ملاذ آمن يعني أن الافراد و الشركات يمكنهم تحويل مدخراتهم من الدولار مثلا الى بيتكوين بسبب سهولة و سرعة التخزين و التحكم مقارنة مع أصول أخرى. الذهب أيضا ملاذ آمن لكن تعلم جيدا الصعوبات و التكاليف لتخزينه و استعماله. حين نقول ملاذ آمن يمكن الاستدلال عليه باستقرار السعر اثناء الفترة الحالية بعد موجة نزول حاد فاننا نعني بذلك الفترة الحالية في واقع الحرب متى يبحث عن الناس عن تحويل أموالهم بالعملات المحلية مثلا (مثال ذلك المستخدمون في دول منطقة الشرق الأوسط حيث يدور الصراع) الى بيتكوين او الى ذهب او الى عملة اخرى يمكن الوثوق باستقرارها الى حد ما كالفرنك السويسري.