khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 11:31:46 PM

Quote from: Salahmu on December 15, 2025, 07:31:20 PM

Casinos does not allow users to register using any random name or other data, if there are people who uses such random data is not because the casino gave them the permission to but because the casino does not no what there real information are but however the place were everything will be resected and transparent is when the use of Kyc will be mandatory to all the users before they can do anything

You are right, but for the record, I remember some casino representatives (not talking about BetPanda) saying that it was ok to provide random information in the registration form, especially when it comes to the phone number.
Now, if you ask me whether that’s ok, I will tell you with total certainty that it is not. Do not do that. If you do not want to reveal your identity then just look for a casino that does not require kyc.

I love the advice you issued, it could only be interpreted as a trap, people should avoid that. This verification of a thing must be sincere and thorough in case you want to do it, so that it will not cause issues for you (that will favour the casino) in the future. KYC casinos are not by force, so anyone who is not willing to reveal their true identity should avoid them for many reasons.

Shortly after your post, I read from some people who claimed that those who wanted to share a phone number but still want privacy should use a burner phone. Is that even wise? Fine many might be using it, but this is not without consequences entirely, and I am sure that it has put some people in trouble of 2FA access, VoIP detection that could cause the account to be flagged, etc.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 11:31:46 PM

Quote from: Salahmu on December 15, 2025, 07:31:20 PM

Casinos does not allow users to register using any random name or other data, if there are people who uses such random data is not because the casino gave them the permission to but because the casino does not no what there real information are but however the place were everything will be resected and transparent is when the use of Kyc will be mandatory to all the users before they can do anything

You are right, but for the record, I remember some casino representatives (not talking about BetPanda) saying that it was ok to provide random information in the registration form, especially when it comes to the phone number.
Now, if you ask me whether that’s ok, I will tell you with total certainty that it is not. Do not do that. If you do not want to reveal your identity then just look for a casino that does not require kyc.

Yes, but the thing is that there could be form of KYC that requires your phone number. But what I observed though is that with crypto based phone numbers are not that usual, but in local phone numbers are very important for 2FA.

So it could be very dangerous as some point to used our phone numbers in crypto base casinos. I would rather used email a disposal one just to be on the safe side and not used my local phone number. KYC is already mandatory though, so it's very hard to not send our personal info specially if we win big from casinos.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 11:31:46 PM

You are right, but for the record, I remember some casino representatives (not talking about BetPanda) saying that it was ok to provide random information in the registration form, especially when it comes to the phone number.
Now, if you ask me whether that’s ok, I will tell you with total certainty that it is not. Do not do that. If you do not want to reveal your identity then just look for a casino that does not require kyc.

Regardless of what other casino representatives said, I would avoid a casino that requires my real phone number and requires me to verify the account by providing OTP. It is probably one of the strongest methods for 2FA, but now the phone number is tied to identity information. Submitting the phone number means sharing your personal information with the casino. So if the phone number is optional and it is okay to submit random phone numbers, I think people who love anonymous casinos would go for it. But at the same time, it is kinda unethical. I would also recommend not to do that.

Quote from: osasshem on Today at 06:05:08 AM

Quote from: mikel_012 on December 15, 2025, 11:48:08 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 11:31:46 PM

<...>

Phone number is different than personal details from KYC. If you put a random phone number to play because you don't want to share yours nothing wrong will happen if they ask for KYC. But if you lie about your full name or country you could have serious problems if they need proof about where you live or who you are (because of anti laundering laws).

I would never lie about my country or use a VPN from a different country when playing in a kyc casino, many people lose money because of this and it's not worth it.

As much as it is not the safest to make use of personal phone number when registering in a Casino, but because of the requirement for KYC verification, providing personal phone number is important, most times (on rare cases) you are being required to verify that you own the number. Though, I heard that one can buy a foreign number for online registrations and stuff; where this becomes dangerous is when it comes to the point of withdrawals and forceful KYC verification (which happened to me in one of these casino platform, it was frustrating).

Some we complicate issues to ourselves during registration on casino platform, during registration some gamblers forgy or fake their documents why registration, and that has been existing issues some gamblers face during withdrawal

When they're called for verification and they find it difficult to use verify their account due they forgy documents to upload as real documents, sometimes some platform is against using VPN to bypass the registration by using any country, so if KYC is needed for verification they find it difficult to present a real document that suits for the verification

During registration, what we need is for the rules of the casino in accordance and also know that using a forgery document to verify our account or changing our location through VPN, it will result out negatively in future, it's better we forget to register than using fake information to fill the gaps of the registration.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 11:59:23 PM

If they want to attract new customers then they need to be more active on their social media pages. Just a friendly advice!.

In this forum as well because the competition is getting tougher from time to time so being more active will be better for them. As I just noticed, the OP last online was a week ago which is not that good for a casino that can be considered as new in this community. Having like a daily update/bump on their own ANN thread is better. Good thing is that they are running signature campaign, some participants may bump this ANN thread regularly, if they dont have a running campaign, I think this ANN thread will be lack of activity.

Quote from: mikel_012 on December 15, 2025, 11:48:08 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 11:31:46 PM

You are right, but for the record, I remember some casino representatives (not talking about BetPanda) saying that it was ok to provide random information in the registration form, especially when it comes to the phone number.
Now, if you ask me whether that’s ok, I will tell you with total certainty that it is not. Do not do that. If you do not want to reveal your identity then just look for a casino that does not require kyc.

Phone number is different than personal details from KYC. If you put a random phone number to play because you don't want to share yours nothing wrong will happen if they ask for KYC. But if you lie about your full name or country you could have serious problems if they need proof about where you live or who you are (because of anti laundering laws).

I would never lie about my country or use a VPN from a different country when playing in a kyc casino, many people lose money because of this and it's not worth it.

As much as it is not the safest to make use of personal phone number when registering in a Casino, but because of the requirement for KYC verification, providing personal phone number is important, most times (on rare cases) you are being required to verify that you own the number. Though, I heard that one can buy a foreign number for online registrations and stuff; where this becomes dangerous is when it comes to the point of withdrawals and forceful KYC verification (which happened to me in one of these casino platform, it was frustrating).

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 15, 2025, 10:26:37 PM

Quote from: Haunebu on December 15, 2025, 11:52:21 AM

Nah. I believe casino games generate more revenue and are more popular on the whole primarily because of the fact that anyone can play them since they are extremely easy to learn while sports betting involves a bit more effort to learn in comparison.

When it comes to sports betting, soccer is definitely the most popular followed by the rest based on my observations.

Well, we would need a casino owner or an official representative who can confirm this, or at least provide us with some stats before we can say with total certainty which one generates the most revenue.
But since we are in the guessing game, and if I had to guess, I would also say that casino games are more popular and generate way more revenue than sports betting.
When it comes to sports betting thrn there is no doubt that soccer (football) is the most popular sport to bet on.

Khaled0111 do have a point though, additional information is needed to better understand the overall situation, otherwise it would be like throwing stons at random. And To be honest, if it's needed to learn then it's no fun at all. For what I have observed (my friends) those who are regularly betting on sports are also sports freak.

Football (not the American one) and cricket, these two are the most famous and betted sports in my opinion.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:31:46 PM

You are right, but for the record, I remember some casino representatives (not talking about BetPanda) saying that it was ok to provide random information in the registration form, especially when it comes to the phone number.
Now, if you ask me whether that’s ok, I will tell you with total certainty that it is not. Do not do that. If you do not want to reveal your identity then just look for a casino that does not require kyc.

Phone number is different than personal details from KYC. If you put a random phone number to play because you don't want to share yours nothing wrong will happen if they ask for KYC. But if you lie about your full name or country you could have serious problems if they need proof about where you live or who you are (because of anti laundering laws).

I would never lie about my country or use a VPN from a different country when playing in a kyc casino, many people lose money because of this and it's not worth it.

Quote from: katanic97 on Today at 07:45:23 PM

Betis is in slightly better form, and you made a good choice. Rayo is playing at home, but they’ve disrupted their form and are far from the level they should be at. I was expecting a slightly higher odds on Betis, but this one isn’t bad either. They need points for a spot in europe, so i wish you good luck and hope Betis wins

Anthony is playing very well in Betis, he found himself after losing and playing very badly in Manchester United. Next season they might go in the top 5 for la liga.

Quote from: BlackBaron on Today at 01:06:21 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 14, 2025, 09:48:14 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 12, 2025, 11:59:24 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 12, 2025, 11:31:03 PM

I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.

Reasonable for what or according to whom? I think that’s the question you need to think of and try to answer.

Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
It won't be reasonable for someone who used to accept rules as facts superior above critics. I am not the only one who think this way, already other users in this discussion share the same idea.

Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.

Being a commun standard between all casinos doesn't make it right.

In this context, it seems to be talking about bonuses and wagering requirements that must be completed for the bonus money to become our money.

Actually, such high requirements I also find it difficult to achieve, but considering this is a bonus so the casino has the right to make such policies. On the other hand as a user, I think we also have the right to negotiate a little although the final result is still the casino who decides.

I would have much more reservations if the terms being discussed here were about our deposit money and we had to reach such a large wagering requirement. And I guess it makes sense that we would object so much.

Requiring a wagering for deposits is mandatory because to forbid users from using the casino as a mixer because without the wagering requirement, someone can deposit and withdraw without placing bets to get a new fresh coins. Users have nothing to discuss about deposit wagering requirement and we don't negotiate about it that much.

Our discussion is not to enforce casinos to make change in the bonus system because they are free to set the minimum they think good for their benefits, but to let users know this is a trap more than a bonus.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 14, 2025, 09:48:14 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 12, 2025, 11:59:24 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 12, 2025, 11:31:03 PM

I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.

Reasonable for what or according to whom? I think that’s the question you need to think of and try to answer.

Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
It won't be reasonable for someone who used to accept rules as facts superior above critics. I am not the only one who think this way, already other users in this discussion share the same idea.

Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.

Being a commun standard between all casinos doesn't make it right.

In this context, it seems to be talking about bonuses and wagering requirements that must be completed for the bonus money to become our money.

Actually, such high requirements I also find it difficult to achieve, but considering this is a bonus so the casino has the right to make such policies. On the other hand as a user, I think we also have the right to negotiate a little although the final result is still the casino who decides.

I would have much more reservations if the terms being discussed here were about our deposit money and we had to reach such a large wagering requirement. And I guess it makes sense that we would object so much.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 14, 2025, 11:35:28 PM

Sorry, but what does sports betting have to do with casino games? Sorry, but I couldn’t follow your logic here.
I agree with you that sports betting depends on skills but we all know that the final outcome of any sport event still rely on luck (whether you like it or no).
To be honest, I do the exactly the opposite. After placing a bet on a sports event, I just start playing casino games while waiting for the outcome of the sportds bet.
Well to each his own..

Whatever we believe, that’s really on us. We like to separate slots and sports betting, saying one is luck-based and the other is skill-based. But sometimes that argument doesn’t even make sense, especially if we’re not reaching our goals anyway.

At the end of the day, the record and the winnings are what judge us, especially when we’re talking about long-term results. So if we claim sports betting is skill-based, can we actually prove it by showing a profitable betting record?

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 14, 2025, 10:38:11 PM

Quote from: Distinctin on December 14, 2025, 10:15:29 PM

After all that, fixed RTP is really just a reference when gambling. Those 24-hour RTP numbers are mostly driven by luck anyway. Someone else being lucky doesn’t mean you’ll be lucky too. We all have our own timing. So regardless of what the numbers show, you can still play if you want. Just don’t overthink it. Stay positive, that’s usually how people feel they attract luck in the first place.

What? Do you know what RTP means? It’s not just numbers!, it’s the "Return To Player". Just think about it for a moment.
You said that some gamblers may get lucky, but this is not the case for most gamblers. What we need to learn is that the exception doesn’t make the rule.
Just like what you said “Just because someone got lucky, it doesn’t mean you will be just as lucky.”

What do you think of me, stupid? Of course I know what RTP means, you don’t need to explain the abbreviation. Maybe you’re not following the previous page. There were already discussing the 24-hour RTP there and how it changes from time to time.

The real RTP is 96.7%, that’s the fixed one. Maybe you should check a few replies back before saying that.
check this specific reply.

Quote from: bitLeap on December 11, 2025, 01:57:05 PM

That's right, there are details in the information section to see the last 24 hours and the overall weekly RTP. In fact, sometimes I always compare the odds of playing a game when the RTP is down below 80%, which is not good. Technically now the Xmas themed Pragmatic games have a pretty healthy RTP averaging above 80% showing the activity towards Christmas is attracting attention. I might try it later Wink

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 12, 2025, 11:59:24 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on December 12, 2025, 11:31:03 PM

I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.

Reasonable for what or according to whom? I think that’s the question you need to think of and try to answer.

Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
It won't be reasonable for someone who used to accept rules as facts superior above critics. I am not the only one who think this way, already other users in this discussion share the same idea.

Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.

Being a commun standard between all casinos doesn't make it right.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 13, 2025, 11:59:36 PM

Quote from: SunFire Casino on December 13, 2025, 08:32:55 AM

🔥 SunFire Update — Faucet Release + Referrals + Games Page
December 13, 2025

Those are some nice updates. Congratulation, SunFireCasino!
Just a small question regarding the new 2FA feature and the possibility to set it to "none". I haven’t tested it intensively, but you said that if 2FA is disabled and set to “none", withdrawals will not be allowed. But I guess anyone (malicious entity for example) who gets access to the account will be able to re-activate it, will he get a new authentication key?. If yes then can you explain how can this protect the user’s funds. And is it possible to activate 2FA only for withdrawals?

Security is definitely important, but I also think users should be able to manage their own setup.
Sometimes convenience or speed matters more, and accepting a certain level of risk should be a personal choice.
As long as strong security options are available, letting users decide when and how to enable them feels like the right balance.

Quote from: DYING_S0UL on Today at 06:59:09 PM

Quote from: salad daging on December 06, 2025, 10:30:54 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 06, 2025, 09:59:13 PM

If your country is restricted by the casino, then you are not supposed to bypass the geo-restriction by using a VPN. Even if a casino representative tells you that it’s okay to do so, don’t do it. Just forget about that casino and try to find a better one.
I don’t know why some people take the risk of playing at a restricted casino, deposit a huge amount of money and believe they will get away with it!
If a casino says they don’t welcome players from your jurisdiction, then just leave it. It’s as simple as that.

Maybe the person wants to play at a restricted casino just chasing bonuses or has confidence in winning at the casino, and indeed we never know the exact reason why so insist on playing at a restricted casino.

But wait this feels so wrong, it's like the casinos are tricking users from restricted locations into making deposits and later blocking it because they are from restriction location Undecided

. To be honest I have never heard of such case. Unintentional playing from a restricted place can be normal, as many people doesn't read the tos properly, but getting blocked after the representative assures you nothing will happen is not acceptable! Can you point to such cases?

For me, I have the opposite situations here! The law of my country prohibits gambling, but many online casinos still allows it, creating a gray area.

Some platforms allow people from restricted countries to gamble here. Especially casino platforms never prevent them from using VPN. I have seen on stake that if they do not allow a user to gamble on their platform, if that user somehow makes a deposit there, then his deposit is returned. I once submitted kyc and made a deposit there but they rejected me because I did not provide a clear picture of my document and I was not allowed to gamble but I was allowed to withdraw my balance. However, not all casino sites will give such an opportunity because reading TOS is very important.

Quote from: salad daging on December 06, 2025, 10:30:54 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 06, 2025, 09:59:13 PM

If your country is restricted by the casino, then you are not supposed to bypass the geo-restriction by using a VPN. Even if a casino representative tells you that it’s okay to do so, don’t do it. Just forget about that casino and try to find a better one.
I don’t know why some people take the risk of playing at a restricted casino, deposit a huge amount of money and believe they will get away with it!
If a casino says they don’t welcome players from your jurisdiction, then just leave it. It’s as simple as that.

Maybe the person wants to play at a restricted casino just chasing bonuses or has confidence in winning at the casino, and indeed we never know the exact reason why so insist on playing at a restricted casino.

But wait this feels so wrong, it's like the casinos are tricking users from restricted locations into making deposits and later blocking it because they are from restriction location Undecided

. To be honest I have never heard of such case. Unintentional playing from a restricted place can be normal, as many people doesn't read the tos properly, but getting blocked after the representative assures you nothing will happen is not acceptable! Can you point to such cases?

For me, I have the opposite situations here! The law of my country prohibits gambling, but many online casinos still allows it, creating a gray area.

247. 502704: zimbo123 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
248. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
249. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
250. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +65 / =1 / -0) (2284 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
251. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +35 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
252. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
253. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
254. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (5905 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
255. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1005 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
256. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1639 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
257. 543626: jackg (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
258. 545598: Isildur (official) (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (87 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
259. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (996 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
260. 547991: phishead (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (342 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
261. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (258 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
262. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +8 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
263. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (637 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
264. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
265. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (8829 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
266. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
267. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5003 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
268. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
269. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
270. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
271. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
272. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
273. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2038 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
274. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
275. 740502: condoras (Trust: +13 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
276. 751988: Taskford (Trust: neutral) (487 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
277. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (522 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (649 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust: neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (3776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (781 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 815246: Murat (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =2 / -0) (2760 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (1017 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 844914: Wind_FURY (Trust: neutral) (1621 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (2402 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (754 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2601 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +140 / =4 / -0) (6332 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 881799: altcoinb (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (552 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 886369: michellee (Trust: neutral) (404 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3645 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1845 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 900408: spirits (Trust: neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +38 / =1 / -0) (3550 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 910236: Woodie (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (848 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1150 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (617 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (399 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1923 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1036 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: neutral) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 942911: entebah (Trust: neutral) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +13 / =6 / -0) (1041 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1189 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1045 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1995 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 965120: celeborne (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (706 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1351 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust: neutral) (6124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (3202 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 1026500: rusbitcoinuser (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5042 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1738 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust: neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2483 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2857 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 11, 2025, 11:33:32 PM

بالنسبة للاوضاع غير المستقرة و وقوع احداث عنف من حين لاخر، فهذا امر عادي و متوقع في بلد عانى لسنوات من الحرب و الاقتتال و لا يزال الوضع فيه غير مستقر. الدول المعنية مثل الولايات المتحدة تعلم ذلك و تتفهمه. ما يهم هنا ان الدولة او النظام الحاكم يقوم بدوره و يتدخل بسرعة و حزم لايقاف اي محاولات لبث الفوضى.

اتفق معك أخي أن هذا أمر طبيعي أن تحدث أحداث عنف من وقت لآخر في بلد عانى من الحرب طويلا ولم يتعافى بعد لكن المشكلة أن الدولة لم تستطع بسط سيطرتها على كافة الفصائل المسلحة وعشائر البدو وهؤلاء هم من يثيرون المشاكل باستمرار لقد ارتكبوا مجازر كبيرة في الساحل السوري والسويداء بحق الأقليات وبالأمس أحداث حمص وهناك عشرات الحوادث الفردية التي تحدث يوميا لم نتكلم عنها.

من أهم الشروط لرفع العقوبات وقانون قيصر هما شرطين مكافحة التنظيمات الإرهـابـية واحترام حقوق الأقليات
إذا لم تتمكن الدولة من ضبط هؤلاء ونزع السلاح من أيديهم فلن يكون هناك استقرار أبدا والمشكلة أن هذه الحوادث تتخذ دوما منحى طائفي حيث أن المقتولين أو المتضررين هم دائما من الأقليات وهذا يشكل نقطة اتهام قوية للحكومة السورية أنها تتغاضى عن جرائم هؤلاء المتعصبين أو غير قادرة على ضبطهم وغير قادرة على حماية الأقليات وهو مايشكل إخلال بشروط رفع الحظر.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:58:37 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on Today at 09:32:14 PM

But in some cases, or let's say in the majority of cases when wagering applied to bonuses, it's almost impossible to make a profit out of it even by winning multiple times. Imagine how many times you have to win to achieve a 45X wagering requirement before being allowed to withdraw.

I don’t know why some gamblers think those requirements are not fair! Maybe because they consider bonuses as free money that they can cash out just like that.
Well, that’s not what bonuses are meant for. Bonuses exist to encourage gamblers to test the casino or to keep them playing for longer and if they are lucky enough, they might end up with some profit that they can cash out.
Casinos offer bonuses in order to make more money, not to give money away, which is also the case for all other kinds of promotions, btw.

I don't know how others may think about its fairness. Personally i find 45X or 25X is so high that can be a total waste of time for anybody.
If the bonus system is made to incentivizing users to join the casino and deposit, the high wager requirement makes it somehow useless. I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.

I can't tell how many users in one casino have been lucky enough to make a profit out of bonus, but I am pretty sure they are so few to none compared to total number of users joining the casino and made a deposit to enjoy the bonus.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 06, 2025, 11:59:22 PM

Quote from: ginsan on December 06, 2025, 10:56:47 PM

99
In my experience it is different sir, maybe the expression I do is based on the feelings accumulated from the many free spins that have been tried, although [un does not have concrete data as a gambler, but as a gambler must feel that why I always do not get a big profit from free spins, in fact I think that in demo mode it is better, it seems that I need to analyze properly in this context to reassure whether it is true or false, it would be very interesting if you find results that can make my eyes open with these two situations.

I feel you. Me as well, I have never been lucky with free spins or any of these free bonuses. I always end up with a small profit (if any). However, I won’t say that I never made a big win because I was playing with free bets, it has nothing to do with that but it certainly had more to do with my bad luck. To me, what you said is nothing but another gambler’s fallacy.
Just to be clear, I need to repeat that I'm talking about fair games from reputable providers.

Well, I think most gamblers go through similar experiences with free bets like what you went through. Personally, the only experience I've had was with my first deposit at a new casino where
I also received a free bet, but I didn't get the chance to win any big prizes from it.

And when I think about it, our experiences are actually quite similar - we do win sometimes, but only minimal amounts. The majority of our free bets still end up losing.
It's really that simple in the end.