khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: Kavelj22 on August 31, 2026, 09:21:19 PM

مجال البحث يصبح مشروعا فقط لرصد اذا كانت تلك المبالغ الضخمة قد انتقلت الى احدى منصات التداول و بالتالي امكانية تأثيرها في اسعار السوق

صحيح كلامك بخصوص الخصوصية، بس بشوف الموضوع مو بس عن رصد وصولها لمنصة، حتى لو ما وصلت لمنصة معروفة ممكن تكون انتقلت لسوق OTC وهذا برضو بيأثر على العرض بطريقة غير مباشرة لان في مشتري حقيقي استلم الكمية هاي، بس صعب نشوفه بنفس وضوح تحويلة لمنصة تداول عادية.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 31, 2026, 11:59:03 PM

اللافتفي عمليات التحويل السابقة هي انه لم يتم تحويل كل المبالغ بل مبالغ صغيرة جدا و هو ما يمكنا من ان نستبعد ان عمليات التحويل صارت لاسباب امنية

نقطة ممتازة صراحة ما كنت منتبه لها، لو كان الهدف امني بحت كان المفروض ينقلوا كل المحفظة دفعة وحدة مو يجربوا بمبالغ صغيرة، هذا فعلا يخلي احتمال البيع او التجربة اقوى من احتمال الحماية من الاختراقات.

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 30, 2026, 10:02:55 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 27, 2026, 11:38:11 PM

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 27, 2026, 11:05:49 PM

...

Almost all casinos on this forum that promote themselves as no-kyc have such clause in their ToS and I think it’s pointless to keep arguing about whether this is acceptable or not as all the previous discussions have led to nothing.
They claim that they have this clause in their ToS just for compliance reasons or to protect themselves in case they suspect someone is cheating and they need his information to complete their investigations.
Personally, I’m OK with this as long as they can guarantee that they will never ask for kyc unless there are serious and clear evidence to suspect that a user is cheating/abusing their system, but I don’t know how they can guarantee that.

okay if this won't change, there is no need to be complaining about casinos clause when they know what they are doing.
Maybe going for other frank casinos are better to use since you will know that you will surely be required to complete KYC by all means.
There are also good KYC casinos to use for betting that will not drain our blood asking for impossible documents.

The problem most of the times for me is not them asking for this kyc in the long run but advertising that it is nokyc and later go back on asking for kyc in the long run is what I really don't like. Because for someone who does not want to undergo kyc registration he will simply not use a casino if it is stated clearly that it is a kyc casino but if not stated no kyc and later demands for kyc then it is not to be trusted because first thing first a casino is suppose to keep to there words.

Danke Dir für das monatliche Resümee! Als nächstes wäre dann eine Qualitative Auswertung der lokalen Boards ganz interessant, auch wenn das wiederum subjektive Ermessenssache wäre... Cheesy

Quote from: Real-Duke on Today at 03:38:32 PM

Unsere TOP 10 der fleißigsten Schreiber im Juli waren:

6. jahead [51]

Bei Platz 6. muss man aber aber jetzt noch keine Rede halten oder? Wink

Weiter fand ich persönlich auch noch diesen Teil vom [CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity ) super interessant, einfach um die Neugier "Wer ist denn so woher oder wo evt. beheimatet?" zu befriedigen und auch mal eine Übersicht zu haben, welche Accounts so mutmaßlich aus welchen Ländern kommen, ist denen Accounts ja schließlich nicht auf die Stirn tätowiert...

Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 07:52:14 AM

The most active members per local board during July 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. Once again joker_josue from Portuguese board is at the top, folloed by chickito from Indonesian and Numeral from Russian local boards. GG guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Numeral [137]	\|	1. mole0815 [72]	\|	1. mandown [109]	\|	1. babo [42]	\|	1. joker_josue [139]	\|	1. Filicius [37]	\|
2. jokers10 [130]	\|	2. Lakai01 [72]	\|	2. Valcendier [81]	\|	2. Italian Panic [42]	\|	2. sabotag3x [98]	\|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	\|
3. klarki [116]	\|	3. Soonandwaite [63]	\|	3. yenerbatmaz [66]	\|	3. fillippone [38]	\|	3. bitmover [61]	\|	3. darbitmobilerecovery [22]	\|
4. safar1980 [105]	\|	4. MinoRaiola [59]	\|	4. MK-74 [61]	\|	4. Ale88 [32]	\|	4. alegotardo [53]	\|	4. famososMuertos [19]	\|
5. Julien_Olynpic [96]	\|	5. MaxMueller [55]	\|	5. RaltcoinsB [60]	\|	5. Plutosky [28]	\|	5. TryNinja [43]	\|	5. darxiaomi [15]	\|
6. internetional [78]	\|	6. jahead [51]	\|	6. Mustang Shelby [58]	\|	6. Ultimo2 [22]	\|	6. Forsyth Jones [38]	\|	6. Marmeladka.cc [13]	\|
7. dwyane36 [63]	\|	7. Real-Duke [48]	\|	7. Hvdv [57]	\|	7. alexrossi [21]	\|	7. criptoevangelista [31]	\|	7. Porfirii [10]	\|
8. Alex077 [60]	\|	8. cygan [40]	\|	8. kriminall [54]	\|	8. gbianchi [19]	\|	8. rdluffy [29]	\|	8. thesebassv [10]	\|
9. xandry [52]	\|	9. Unknown01 [34]	\|	9. Phoenix Anka [54]	\|	9. Brcbrc [16]	\|	9. alexrossi [28]	\|	9. GazetaBitcoin [9]	\|
10. zasad@ [49]	\|	10. 5tift [31]	\|	10. Xyloo [53]	\|	10. rtx10 [14]	\|	10. Pumared [21]	\|	10. Allo-obmen [9]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [138]	\|	1. BinaryWizard [8]	\|	1. Peanutswar [41]	\|	1. Daniel91 [40]	\|	1. Floxynice [75]	\|	1. khaled0111 [34]	\|
2. joniboini [51]	\|	2. winspiral [6]	\|	2. Asuspawer09 [37]	\|	2. slackovic [34]	\|	2. Charles-Tim [54]	\|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	\|
3. taufik123 [47]	\|	3. Danydee [5]	\|	3. tech30338 [37]	\|	3. katanic97 [32]	\|	3. Africolo [54]	\|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	\|
4. Luzin [39]	\|	4. Perosy [5]	\|	4. arwin100 [30]	\|	4. Rikafip [31]	\|	4. TrialBitcoin [51]	\|	4. OmegaStarScream [15]	\|
5. Husna QA [37]	\|	5. TryNinja [3]	\|	5. blockman [29]	\|	5. Pmalek [26]	\|	5. Mayor of ogba [46]	\|	5. GxSTxV [10]	\|
6. AakZaki [34]	\|	6. DenisDenis [2]	\|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	\|	6. ovcijisir [22]	\|	6. CryptopreneurBrainboss [42]	\|	6. hugeblack [6]	\|
7. mu_enrico [34]	\|	7. Halab [2]	\|	7. bhadz [23]	\|	7. dkbit98 [15]	\|	7. Tetu100 [42]	\|	7. aseemhamza [5]	\|
8. kawetsriyanto [32]	\|	8. EXMON [2]	\|	8. cryptoaddictchie [23]	\|	8. cryptofrka [14]	\|	8. Yablee0 [41]	\|	8. Xmors [3]	\|
9. masulum [24]	\|	9. genius89 [2]	\|	9. fighter2627 [23]	\|	9. examplens [13]	\|	9. Agbamoni [40]	\|	9. lastpixellive [2]	\|
10. salad daging [16]	\|	10. lastpixellive [2]	\|	10. coin-investor [22]	\|	10. BitGoba [12]	\|	10. Plutomanian [39]	\|	10. nexguard [1]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [19]	\|	1. Cointikka [34]	\|	1. cryptosize [31]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [51]	\|	1. Bd officer [19]	\|
2. pawel7777 [4]	\|	2. JSRAW [33]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [22]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	\|	2. Bityar [42]	\|	2. Review Master [13]	\|
3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. Bitcoin Smith [28]	\|	3. Conqueror777 [9]	\|	3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. Junii [39]	\|	3. Shishir99 [11]	\|
4. EXMON [2]	\|	4. eaLiTy [27]	\|	4. alani123 [3]	\|	4. lastpixellive [2]	\|	4. JunaidAzizi [38]	\|	4. NNRR [8]	\|
5. lastpixellive [1]	\|	5. pawanjain [19]	\|	5. Makis Kotzampasis [2]	\|	5. jedaite [1]	\|	5. Sawera2255@ [38]	\|	5. Crypto Library [8]	\|
6.	\|	6. GazetaBitcoin [9]	\|	6. Ultegra134 [1]	\|	6. daniosem [1]	\|	6. Abdul Sami786 [34]	\|	6. Z_MBFM [8]	\|
7.	\|	7. vivekdhyani1 [4]	\|	7. lastpixellive [1]	\|	7. b1ack [1]	\|	7. Nmjut [30]	\|	7. Nothingtodo [7]	\|
8.	\|	8. weallbitcoiners [4]	\|	8.	\|	8. nexguard [1]	\|	8. HustleZ [29]	\|	8. DYING_S0UL [7]	\|
9.	\|	9. Nrcewker [3]	\|	9.	\|	9.	\|	9. Fragrance1122 [29]	\|	9. Tiger096 [4]	\|
10.	\|	10. TheUltraElite [3]	\|	10.	\|	10.	\|	10. snowpega [27]	\|	10. Murat [2]	\|

Quote from: Y3shot on August 30, 2026, 07:19:14 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 26, 2026, 11:33:31 PM

Quote from: CryptoHeadlineNews on August 26, 2026, 07:04:47 AM

...

If you are going to keep your coins on a casino then you are treating it as a wallet, which is wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you have deposited those coins or won them. It also doesn’t matter if it’s a trusted casino or not (you should only play on trusted casinos, obviously), because even if it’s a trusted casino, bad things can still happen, like the casino getting hacked or going bankrupt.
So, always withdraw your coins whenever you can and this applies to all crypto services, not just casinos.

People should understand the risk of leaving funds in a casino. The reputation of a casino doesn't prevent what may happen to it in the future. A casino can go bankrupt and decide to shut down, or it can be hacked, which the owner and management may not even be aware of when it occurs. A reputable casino doesn't mean that users should just rely on it to keep their money if they are not even ready to place a bet.

Exactly I feel it's pointless to just deposit money into your casino wallet and leave it without making use of it after a while because just like you said even if I trust a casinos reputation how about other things that cause lost of fund. It's better to leave your fund in your trust digital wallets and send to your casino wallet when you want to make a bet and not to leave it in your casino wallet for a long time. It's my opinion though and I don't know if there are other benefits I don't know of that people get from keeping there funds for long in there casino wallet.

Its time for yet another brief overview of local boards activity, and I am so late that I am literally writing this from hotel room, few hours before I have to check out and fly back home (otherwise I won't have time to do it before month ends). All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards.

Post activity per local board during July 2026

During above mentioned period, 13928 posts were made across local boards, which is a small increase compared to June (13659). Top 5 most active boards remained almost the same as month before, with only Pakistan and German locals changing spots.

Active members per local board during July 2026

During July, 1298 members wrote at least one post across one of the local boards, and is yet again small increase compared to June, during which 1290 members were active. Like in previous chart, there's no much change among the most active boards, with Nigerian remaining far ahead the others.

Local board members per amount of posts during July 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leaders are Romanian and Indian boards with 50%, while Pakistan had only 3% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket, leader is Polish board with 60%, while Turkish local board had only 20%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Turkish board with 52%, while French board (once again) had no members in that bracket.

Merit shared per local board during July 2026

During July, 5818 merit was sent across local boards that are part of this overview, and is a bog drop compared to June's numbers (6573). Majorify of this drop happened on German board, that went from 1267 merit sent in June to 612 in July. These kind of fluctuations aren't strange fro them, so I wouldn't be surprised if they go back to their old numbers.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during July 2026

During July, average merit per post ratio across local boards was 0.42, which is a drop compared to June's 0.48 merit per post. Italian board remained at the top, but what is noticeable that majority of local boards had lower July's ratio, compared to 12 month average.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during July 2026

During July, 509 members sent while 588 received merit, which is a small decrease compared to month before (525 senders, 601 receiver).

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during July 2026

Romanian board remained at the top of this chart, with Italian board right behind them, while others are a little bit further behind.

Merit per transaction across local boards during July 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that gives more info on meriting habits of each local board. Having said that, it can be very deceiving as Greek board is at the top with basically having only 1 merit transaction during July.

The most active members per local board during July 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. Once again joker_josue from Portuguese board is at the top, folloed by chickito from Indonesian and Numeral from Russian local boards. GG guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Numeral [137]	\|	1. mole0815 [72]	\|	1. mandown [109]	\|	1. babo [42]	\|	1. joker_josue [139]	\|	1. Filicius [37]	\|
2. jokers10 [130]	\|	2. Lakai01 [72]	\|	2. Valcendier [81]	\|	2. Italian Panic [42]	\|	2. sabotag3x [98]	\|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	\|
3. klarki [116]	\|	3. Soonandwaite [63]	\|	3. yenerbatmaz [66]	\|	3. fillippone [38]	\|	3. bitmover [61]	\|	3. darbitmobilerecovery [22]	\|
4. safar1980 [105]	\|	4. MinoRaiola [59]	\|	4. MK-74 [61]	\|	4. Ale88 [32]	\|	4. alegotardo [53]	\|	4. famososMuertos [19]	\|
5. Julien_Olynpic [96]	\|	5. MaxMueller [55]	\|	5. RaltcoinsB [60]	\|	5. Plutosky [28]	\|	5. TryNinja [43]	\|	5. darxiaomi [15]	\|
6. internetional [78]	\|	6. jahead [51]	\|	6. Mustang Shelby [58]	\|	6. Ultimo2 [22]	\|	6. Forsyth Jones [38]	\|	6. Marmeladka.cc [13]	\|
7. dwyane36 [63]	\|	7. Real-Duke [48]	\|	7. Hvdv [57]	\|	7. alexrossi [21]	\|	7. criptoevangelista [31]	\|	7. Porfirii [10]	\|
8. Alex077 [60]	\|	8. cygan [40]	\|	8. kriminall [54]	\|	8. gbianchi [19]	\|	8. rdluffy [29]	\|	8. thesebassv [10]	\|
9. xandry [52]	\|	9. Unknown01 [34]	\|	9. Phoenix Anka [54]	\|	9. Brcbrc [16]	\|	9. alexrossi [28]	\|	9. GazetaBitcoin [9]	\|
10. zasad@ [49]	\|	10. 5tift [31]	\|	10. Xyloo [53]	\|	10. rtx10 [14]	\|	10. Pumared [21]	\|	10. Allo-obmen [9]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [138]	\|	1. BinaryWizard [8]	\|	1. Peanutswar [41]	\|	1. Daniel91 [40]	\|	1. Floxynice [75]	\|	1. khaled0111 [34]	\|
2. joniboini [51]	\|	2. winspiral [6]	\|	2. Asuspawer09 [37]	\|	2. slackovic [34]	\|	2. Charles-Tim [54]	\|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	\|
3. taufik123 [47]	\|	3. Danydee [5]	\|	3. tech30338 [37]	\|	3. katanic97 [32]	\|	3. Africolo [54]	\|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	\|
4. Luzin [39]	\|	4. Perosy [5]	\|	4. arwin100 [30]	\|	4. Rikafip [31]	\|	4. TrialBitcoin [51]	\|	4. OmegaStarScream [15]	\|
5. Husna QA [37]	\|	5. TryNinja [3]	\|	5. blockman [29]	\|	5. Pmalek [26]	\|	5. Mayor of ogba [46]	\|	5. GxSTxV [10]	\|
6. AakZaki [34]	\|	6. DenisDenis [2]	\|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	\|	6. ovcijisir [22]	\|	6. CryptopreneurBrainboss [42]	\|	6. hugeblack [6]	\|
7. mu_enrico [34]	\|	7. Halab [2]	\|	7. bhadz [23]	\|	7. dkbit98 [15]	\|	7. Tetu100 [42]	\|	7. aseemhamza [5]	\|
8. kawetsriyanto [32]	\|	8. EXMON [2]	\|	8. cryptoaddictchie [23]	\|	8. cryptofrka [14]	\|	8. Yablee0 [41]	\|	8. Xmors [3]	\|
9. masulum [24]	\|	9. genius89 [2]	\|	9. fighter2627 [23]	\|	9. examplens [13]	\|	9. Agbamoni [40]	\|	9. lastpixellive [2]	\|
10. salad daging [16]	\|	10. lastpixellive [2]	\|	10. coin-investor [22]	\|	10. BitGoba [12]	\|	10. Plutomanian [39]	\|	10. nexguard [1]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [19]	\|	1. Cointikka [34]	\|	1. cryptosize [31]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [51]	\|	1. Bd officer [19]	\|
2. pawel7777 [4]	\|	2. JSRAW [33]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [22]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	\|	2. Bityar [42]	\|	2. Review Master [13]	\|
3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. Bitcoin Smith [28]	\|	3. Conqueror777 [9]	\|	3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. Junii [39]	\|	3. Shishir99 [11]	\|
4. EXMON [2]	\|	4. eaLiTy [27]	\|	4. alani123 [3]	\|	4. lastpixellive [2]	\|	4. JunaidAzizi [38]	\|	4. NNRR [8]	\|
5. lastpixellive [1]	\|	5. pawanjain [19]	\|	5. Makis Kotzampasis [2]	\|	5. jedaite [1]	\|	5. Sawera2255@ [38]	\|	5. Crypto Library [8]	\|
6.	\|	6. GazetaBitcoin [9]	\|	6. Ultegra134 [1]	\|	6. daniosem [1]	\|	6. Abdul Sami786 [34]	\|	6. Z_MBFM [8]	\|
7.	\|	7. vivekdhyani1 [4]	\|	7. lastpixellive [1]	\|	7. b1ack [1]	\|	7. Nmjut [30]	\|	7. Nothingtodo [7]	\|
8.	\|	8. weallbitcoiners [4]	\|	8.	\|	8. nexguard [1]	\|	8. HustleZ [29]	\|	8. DYING_S0UL [7]	\|
9.	\|	9. Nrcewker [3]	\|	9.	\|	9.	\|	9. Fragrance1122 [29]	\|	9. Tiger096 [4]	\|
10.	\|	10. TheUltraElite [3]	\|	10.	\|	10.	\|	10. snowpega [27]	\|	10. Murat [2]	\|

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 30, 2026, 10:02:55 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 27, 2026, 11:38:11 PM

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 27, 2026, 11:05:49 PM

...

Almost all casinos on this forum that promote themselves as no-kyc have such clause in their ToS and I think it’s pointless to keep arguing about whether this is acceptable or not as all the previous discussions have led to nothing.
They claim that they have this clause in their ToS just for compliance reasons or to protect themselves in case they suspect someone is cheating and they need his information to complete their investigations.
Personally, I’m OK with this as long as they can guarantee that they will never ask for kyc unless there are serious and clear evidence to suspect that a user is cheating/abusing their system, but I don’t know how they can guarantee that.

okay if this won't change, there is no need to be complaining about casinos clause when they know what they are doing.
Maybe going for other frank casinos are better to use since you will know that you will surely be required to complete KYC by all means.
There are also good KYC casinos to use for betting that will not drain our blood asking for impossible documents.

Sincerely there are good casinos out here that can be trusted when it come to no KYC. But the thing is at some point for proper usage there is need to do the KYC. So it can only last for a few people which is why it advisable to always be guided and have it in mind that even if the casino allowed no KYC at some point in the future it will be needed. No gabler should relax with the believe that it will continue to be no KYC for ever.

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on Today at 10:02:55 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 27, 2026, 11:38:11 PM

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 27, 2026, 11:05:49 PM

...

Almost all casinos on this forum that promote themselves as no-kyc have such clause in their ToS and I think it’s pointless to keep arguing about whether this is acceptable or not as all the previous discussions have led to nothing.
They claim that they have this clause in their ToS just for compliance reasons or to protect themselves in case they suspect someone is cheating and they need his information to complete their investigations.
Personally, I’m OK with this as long as they can guarantee that they will never ask for kyc unless there are serious and clear evidence to suspect that a user is cheating/abusing their system, but I don’t know how they can guarantee that.

okay if this won't change, there is no need to be complaining about casinos clause when they know what they are doing.
Maybe going for other frank casinos are better to use since you will know that you will surely be required to complete KYC by all means.
There are also good KYC casinos to use for betting that will not drain our blood asking for impossible documents.

These are more reasons why you should mind the type of gambling site you would use to gamble, and you don't just have to jump over gambling site due to their bonuses or whatever offers they have provided.
As far as I know, there are people who do not really like to involved themselves with kyc casino because at times when there is a high winning from the gambling they could asked you for additional information and documentation before you could be allowed to make withdrawal and even as that they wouldn't mind be checking about illegals gambling or arbitrage betting as well.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 27, 2026, 11:38:11 PM

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 27, 2026, 11:05:49 PM

...

Almost all casinos on this forum that promote themselves as no-kyc have such clause in their ToS and I think it’s pointless to keep arguing about whether this is acceptable or not as all the previous discussions have led to nothing.
They claim that they have this clause in their ToS just for compliance reasons or to protect themselves in case they suspect someone is cheating and they need his information to complete their investigations.
Personally, I’m OK with this as long as they can guarantee that they will never ask for kyc unless there are serious and clear evidence to suspect that a user is cheating/abusing their system, but I don’t know how they can guarantee that.

okay if this won't change, there is no need to be complaining about casinos clause when they know what they are doing.
Maybe going for other frank casinos are better to use since you will know that you will surely be required to complete KYC by all means.
There are also good KYC casinos to use for betting that will not drain our blood asking for impossible documents.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 26, 2026, 11:33:31 PM

Quote from: CryptoHeadlineNews on August 26, 2026, 07:04:47 AM

...

If you are going to keep your coins on a casino then you are treating it as a wallet, which is wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you have deposited those coins or won them. It also doesn’t matter if it’s a trusted casino or not (you should only play on trusted casinos, obviously), because even if it’s a trusted casino, bad things can still happen, like the casino getting hacked or going bankrupt.
So, always withdraw your coins whenever you can and this applies to all crypto services, not just casinos.

Keeping your coin a casino does not make any sense at all. It can be risky because a good casino can trun to scam and that can make it hard for anyone that have huge amounts of money on the casino to be allowed to withdraw the money.
We must have heard different stories about casinos scamming their users and also not allowing them to make withdrawals. Prevention is better than unnecessary explanation while seeking justification.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 26, 2026, 11:33:31 PM

Quote from: CryptoHeadlineNews on August 26, 2026, 07:04:47 AM

...

If you are going to keep your coins on a casino then you are treating it as a wallet, which is wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you have deposited those coins or won them. It also doesn’t matter if it’s a trusted casino or not (you should only play on trusted casinos, obviously), because even if it’s a trusted casino, bad things can still happen, like the casino getting hacked or going bankrupt.
So, always withdraw your coins whenever you can and this applies to all crypto services, not just casinos.

People should understand the risk of leaving funds in a casino. The reputation of a casino doesn't prevent what may happen to it in the future. A casino can go bankrupt and decide to shut down, or it can be hacked, which the owner and management may not even be aware of when it occurs. A reputable casino doesn't mean that users should just rely on it to keep their money if they are not even ready to place a bet.

366. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +13 / =6 / -0) (1413 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1322 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 965120: celeborne (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1481 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (784 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3623 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust: neutral) (7434 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (3352 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
383. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
384. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
385. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
386. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5582 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
387. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
388. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
389. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
390. 1046135: AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (470 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
391. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust: neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
392. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2716 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
393. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (3053 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
394. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
395. 1071136: PHI1618 (Trust: # +2 / =1 / -0) (1235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
396. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
397. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
398. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
399. 1080073: Spack17 (Trust: neutral) (291 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
400. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
401. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
402. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
403. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
404. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2653 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
405. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1221 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
406. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust: neutral) (3067 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
407. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1950 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
408. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
409. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (756 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
410. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
411. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1471 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
412. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust: neutral) (2370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
413. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
414. 1136512: Xylber (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
415. 1137750: bavicrypto (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
416. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust: neutral) (2836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
417. 1139993: Baoo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
418. 1143164: LogitechMouse (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1069 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
419. 1146433: JooBra (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (62 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
420. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust: neutral) (1786 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
421. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1425 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
422. 1164586: gpfrag (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
423. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3138 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
424. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (2339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
425. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (689 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
426. 1173695: sAj1420 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
427. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1567 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
428. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
429. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (18914 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
430. 1192397: paxmao (Trust: neutral) (1635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
431. 1202061: chimk (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (714 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
432. 1210149: ithd1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
433. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1817 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
434. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
435. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust: neutral) (9009 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
436. 1237522: Plutosky (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
437. 1239916: ZipReg (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (843 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
438. 1260847: creep_o (Trust: neutral) (1001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
439. 1265260: ovcijisir (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1360 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
440. 1275282: joniboini (Trust: neutral) (1909 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
441. 1283017: masulum (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1968 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
442. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +54 / =0 / -0) (579 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
443. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3351 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
444. 1292764: notocactus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (5118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
445. 1297306: haloxon (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
446. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1515 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
447. 1342946: Deadrisinghelp (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
448. 1365271: RGBTC (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
449. 1385147: ILuckyGuyI (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (674 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
450. 1392550: zeki555 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
451. 1410401: dkbit98 (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (8829 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
452. 1422438: Paolo.Demidov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2686 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
453. 1433865: witcher_sense (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (4445 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
454. 1452494: UserU (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (578 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
455. 1464056: Mrstacy (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
456. 1478835: MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +60 / =0 / -0) (3579 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
457. 1541583: sky999 (Trust: neutral) (785 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
458. 1564795: Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1286 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
459. 1573369: casperBGD (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
460. 1574226: mu_enrico (Trust: neutral) (2465 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
461. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1492 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
462. 1583465: Dernoste (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (170 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
463. 1593137: famososMuertos (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
464. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3499 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
465. 1644820: bitcoiner24h (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
466. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (1418 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
467. 1681586: RickDeckard (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
468. 1695463: Speculatoross (Trust: neutral) (353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
469. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
470. 1762404: Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
471. 1775670: bubbalex (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
472. 1781771: Mbitr (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
473. 1803753: Kylapoiss (Trust: neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
474. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2212 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
475. 1855828: taikuri13 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1715 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
476. 1856285: ~~Leviathan.007~~ Banned! (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (722 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
477. 1856852: katanic97 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1328 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
478. 1883627: shasan (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1480 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
479. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2638 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
480. 1903411: BITCOIN4X (Trust: neutral) (1193 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
481. 1926710: Renato297 (Trust: neutral) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
482. 1932205: CucakRowo (Trust: neutral) (597 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
483. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
484. 2000200: 1Dq (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
485. 2003707: kawetsriyanto (Trust: neutral) (1189 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
486. 2004043: Zwei (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (1362 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
487. 2005913: Corrosive (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
488. 2033515: mikeywith (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (7198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: SilverCryptoBullet on Today at 06:03:21 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 28, 2026, 10:35:02 PM

I agree with you that sports betting attracts a lot of gamblers, but I wouldn’t go to the extent of saying that they are not serious about their business just because they haven’t introduced a sportsbook yet. Luckiest is still a relatively new casino (they created this announcement thread like one month ago) and there is still much time for them to make improvements and add new features.
I remember there was a casino that started with a single game and that remained the case for months, then they started adding more games (from different providers) and now they are among the biggest casinos in the industry!

The gambling industry is very big and there are many types of gambling so it's possible for a gambling company to focus on only one or some gambling products for their users. If their site is smoothly operating, their business is provably fair and trustworthy, they will have a good gambling business. Just focus on what they do best, and they will be able to run the business along time with good revenue.

Sportsbook or no sportsbook, it won't decide the future and success of Luckiest casino as history in this industry shows that there are many casinos without sportsbook.

I agree with you because we all know gambling industry is so big. Many crypto casinos focus on products on which they can handle well. Having a sportsbook is not mandatory, although many request to add it especially on reputable casinos, since many people want convenience.

Adding sportsbook is not actually primary requirements to succeed. There are lots of crypto casino generating strong revenue even if they didn't add sportsbook in their platform.

What actually matter is they operate smoothly and they can offer legitimate provably fair games to there users, then also they usually they have fast withdrawal process.

If they are consistent with those important points I mentioned earlier. This could help them a lot to gain more trust and that also lead for more potential growth, even if they add sportsbook or not.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 28, 2026, 10:35:02 PM

I agree with you that sports betting attracts a lot of gamblers, but I wouldn’t go to the extent of saying that they are not serious about their business just because they haven’t introduced a sportsbook yet. Luckiest is still a relatively new casino (they created this announcement thread like one month ago) and there is still much time for them to make improvements and add new features.
I remember there was a casino that started with a single game and that remained the case for months, then they started adding more games (from different providers) and now they are among the biggest casinos in the industry!

The gambling industry is very big and there are many types of gambling so it's possible for a gambling company to focus on only one or some gambling products for their users. If their site is smoothly operating, their business is provably fair and trustworthy, they will have a good gambling business. Just focus on what they do best, and they will be able to run the business along time with good revenue.

Sportsbook or no sportsbook, it won't decide the future and success of Luckiest casino as history in this industry shows that there are many casinos without sportsbook.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:53:48 PM

Regarding this point, if you are from an allowed country and, for whatever reason, your VPN makes it look like you are connecting from a restricted country, then this shouldn’t be a big problem as long as you are playing at a reputable casino. If the casino detects that you are accessing their website from a restricted region and suspends your account based on that, then the issue can be easily resolved by contacting customer support and explaining what happened to them.

A good reputable casino should not even be able to let you access their website or sign up/sign in from a restricted region in the first place through geoblocking. Casinos that let uses sign in yet they are from banned regions or iP addresses of Banned regions should be carefully considered un safe

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:53:43 PM

Quote from: knuckey on August 27, 2026, 11:07:56 PM

but we see they are making updates that are important for comfort and wider promotion, as they say this is not the final version, so it's possible they will update the design in the future

That’s true. They introduced some interesting updates as they announced earlier and I’m confident that they will keep working on improving their casino based on users’ feedback and suggestions. You can see how active the OP is and how detailed his replies are and this proves that they are truly committed to this project and that they will do everything, including adding new features as requested by the community, to make it succeed.

Yeah there's more possibilities that more updates to come knowing that they are truly listening on the recommendations drop by their community.

Also this is what I really like about them, aside that OP is so active. Their support is so active to.

I have an issue regarding on migration earlier. First I cannot see the balance I left on my account, the second one is after finishing forgetting my password later on I can't access my account. Their support step up and help me solve my issue.

Now everything is fine and didn't experience any troubles.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 27, 2026, 11:38:11 PM

Quote from: Sarah Jordan on August 27, 2026, 11:05:49 PM

...

Almost all casinos on this forum that promote themselves as no-kyc have such clause in their ToS and I think it’s pointless to keep arguing about whether this is acceptable or not as all the previous discussions have led to nothing.
They claim that they have this clause in their ToS just for compliance reasons or to protect themselves in case they suspect someone is cheating and they need his information to complete their investigations.
Personally, I’m OK with this as long as they can guarantee that they will never ask for kyc unless there are serious and clear evidence to suspect that a user is cheating/abusing their system, but I don’t know how they can guarantee that.

The term "no kyc" has shifted away from its original meaning. Originally, no kyc should be no kyc at all but lately it is being used only for marketing strategy while in fact it is only mean that KYC is not mandatory where there is still high possibility to be asked later as the casino deserve the right to do it as what is written in the terms. All in all, we should no longer expect or we should lower our expectation when we see "no kyc" used by casino in their ANN thread.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:45:24 PM

I just visited the new platform and I’m not sure if you have introduced any changes to the design, but I have just one remark regarding what I have seen. Although the overall design looks nice, the banner and the original games icons on the top of the page (on mobile) use exactly the same colors and theme, with the black background, it looks like one large flat image/banner rather than dfferent elements. To be honest, it’s not very pleasant to the eye (but that’s just me!).

They don't seem to focus too much on design, indeed the appearance is a little less comfortable, but we see they are making updates that are important for comfort and wider promotion, as they say this is not the final version, so it's possible they will update the design in the future, we all hope for that because the less attractive appearance definitely discourages playing for a long time

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 26, 2026, 11:33:31 PM

Quote from: CryptoHeadlineNews on August 26, 2026, 07:04:47 AM

...

If you are going to keep your coins on a casino then you are treating it as a wallet, which is wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you have deposited those coins or won them. It also doesn’t matter if it’s a trusted casino or not (you should only play on trusted casinos, obviously), because even if it’s a trusted casino, bad things can still happen, like the casino getting hacked or going bankrupt.
So, always withdraw your coins whenever you can and this applies to all crypto services, not just casinos.

I've never and don't think I'll ever understand those that keep huge funds in their casino accounts. Regardless of the level of reputation a casino has, it does not in anyway remove risks completely. A casino site can be hacked, have technical issues that might be very difficult to resolve or even disappear from the internet.

I'll be more comfortable to leave my coins in an exchange than a casino account because I feel an exchange is safer with securing funds at their disposal.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:59:42 PM

شكرا اخي هيوج على الايضاح و شرح كيف تتم عملية التقييم و على ماذا تستند.
كنت ايضا ساطرح تساؤلا حول ان كان التقرير يذكر بشكل مفصل المعايير التي تم اعتمادها عند القيام بهذه الدراسة، و هذا امر لا بد من وجوده في اي تقرير تصدره جهة محترمة حتى يكون ذا مصداقية.
اطلعت على الموضوع الاصلي و وجدت ان كاتب المقال ذكر ان هناك ثلاثون معيارا الا انه ذكر القليل منها فقط. و للاسف، ككل المنشورات في المواقع العربية، كاتب الموضوع لم يكلف نفسه عناء اضافة رابط الدراسة او حتى رابط الموقع الرسمي للجهة التي قامت بها..
طبعا يمكن القيام ببحث على قوقل لايجاد الروابط، لكن كان من واجب كاتب المقال القيام بذلك.

غالبا لم تجد اي روابط موثوقة لانه من الواضح ان المسؤول عن نشر المقال يريد تمرير رسائل واضحة سواء بالتقليل من الدولة السورية و الشعب السوري خصوصا بصرف النظر عن القيادات، او باظهار العرب كواجهة للتخلف مستغلا بذلك جهل القارئ بابسط بديهيات التفكير النقدي البسيطة. استغرب من الثلاثين معيارا التي تصنف دمشق اخطر عاصمة و تترك مكسيكو و بانكوك و بيونغ يانغ.

في سياق متصل اجد كن الجيد الذكر ان الولايات المتحدة رفعت اخطر تصنيف عن سوريا الذي هو "دولة راعية للارهاب" الذي بدأ العمل به منذ اكثر من 47 سنة. الغاء التصنيف يعدوخطوة جيدة محو بناء المزيد كن الثقة في سوريا ز يفتح امامها افاقا ارحب.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:28 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on August 25, 2026, 08:49:09 PM

هذه ازمة هيكلية في تصميم المشروع بحد ذاته و تتواصل لتبلغ درجة ان الفريق ليس مهتما اصلا بالعمل على التحديثات و مراقبة فرص الاستغلال التي يبدو انها كانت دوما موجودة قبل وقت طويل من حدوث هذه العمليات. لقد بلغت بهم درجة التستهتار ان لا يتابعوا حتى اخبار السوق للحصول على اشعارات تنبيه لتجنيهم ان تتكرر معهم احدى المآسي و لكنهم خيروا النوم في العسل. هذا على الاقل ما من المنطقي توقعه بعد حادثة Ponk.

هذا هو الفرق بين المشاريع و العملات التي اطلقها و طورها اصحابها من اجل تحقيق فكرة نبيلة و خدمة المجموعة بدون انتظار اي مقابل و بين تلك التي هدف اصحابها تحقيق الربح السريع فقط.
احسن مثال على ذلك هو البيتكوين الذي لازلنا لا نعرف من قام بتطويره اول مرة و رغم الثروة التي يمتلكها من ورائه الا انه لم يقم بلمسها و ترك المشروع للمجموعة كي تواصل تطويره. هذه هي المشاريع التي يجب دعمها و الاستثمار فيها و ليس تلك المشاريع التي يكون الرابح الوحيد منها هو صاحبها.

ليس هناك مجال لمقارنة البيتكوين باي مشروع لان المفهوم the concept مختلف تماما عن اي مشروع احر. البيتكوين حقق عوائد لصاحبه و لاوائل المشجعين للفكرة تفوق بكثير ما يمكن ان يفكر بتحقيقه اي مستثمر مستقل. البيتكوين كاولة محطة في رحلة الكريبتو كان هو الذي مهد الطريق لظهور مشاريع خاصة اي انه مصمم بقابلية للتطوير استغلها العديد لاطلاق مشاربع جديدة لا يمكن انكار ان العديد منها يحقق نجاح بشكل متوازن سواء لفريق العمل او للمستثمرين. المشكلة هنا مع نظام arbitrage غير معدل و يستقطب اناسا ليسوا من ذوي الخبرة التقنية بل فقط مستثمرون ينتظرون عوائد الاستثمار دون بذل اي مجهود يذكر.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 26, 2026, 11:33:31 PM

Quote from: CryptoHeadlineNews on August 26, 2026, 07:04:47 AM

...

If you are going to keep your coins on a casino then you are treating it as a wallet, which is wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you have deposited those coins or won them. It also doesn’t matter if it’s a trusted casino or not (you should only play on trusted casinos, obviously), because even if it’s a trusted casino, bad things can still happen, like the casino getting hacked or going bankrupt.
So, always withdraw your coins whenever you can and this applies to all crypto services, not just casinos.

Right, that is not recommended using casino to keep your coins. We don't know how long they will online and even they announce shutting down the casino and guarantee that the fund is safe and members can withdraw anytime, that still not good enough. People must have separate wallet to keep the coin and other wallets to be the place to gambling. Withdrawing your coins and not leaving too big funds in your casino account is the thing you should do so you can prevent the regret if casino becomes scam.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 26, 2026, 11:33:31 PM

Quote from: CryptoHeadlineNews on August 26, 2026, 07:04:47 AM

...

If you are going to keep your coins on a casino then you are treating it as a wallet, which is wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you have deposited those coins or won them. It also doesn’t matter if it’s a trusted casino or not (you should only play on trusted casinos, obviously), because even if it’s a trusted casino, bad things can still happen, like the casino getting hacked or going bankrupt.
So, always withdraw your coins whenever you can and this applies to all crypto services, not just casinos.

Funds left on a casino are meant to be used for gambling, any other reason is not wise for a player to leave their money on a casino.
Maybe the player may want to gamble big or may not want to stress themselves on making another new deposit when they needed to bet.
The fund left on a casino can make one to gamble irresponsible and that is enough reasons to avoid leaving big amount there.

Quote from: khaled0111 on August 20, 2026, 09:15:54 PM

Quote from: Patikno on August 19, 2026, 09:17:19 PM

I might reach the Silver rank before long; I have already hit Bronze-2, even though I was at Bronze-1 just yesterday. I will likely reach Silver next month, or the month after. Because, I feel like I will be very active on this platform, especially since I feel lucky playing at Rizzy.

Believe it or not, my luck coming back again, and again the last time I played, but I am not playing the same game as I said before. Now, I have played the lightning game.

Congratulations on reaching Bronze-2, Patinko and hopefully you will reach the Silver tier soon!
I just watched the game replay you shared and that was a really nice win (tuurning $0.20 into more than $40). With such luck, I have no doubt you will keep ranking up quickly.
I haven’t played slots in a while and watching that replay makes me want to play again to try my luck.

Thanks for the congratulations; I hope you enjoy similar good luck, especially when you play slots again in your next session.

I am also hoping to reach the Silver tier soon. Right now, I am at Bronze 4; about halfway to Bronze 5, and I look forward to reaching the tier that offers monthly bonuses.

By the way, I’d suggest not pushing your luck too hard, especially if you feel like things aren't going your way. There is always another session, so it should be better to play during your free time, without interfering with your main responsibilities. Above all, I hope you play responsibly, and wisely.