khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 05, 2025, 11:07:05 PM

الامر الاسوأ هو قيامهم بحجز اموال من يقوم بمخالفة قانونهم السخيف. كان يمكن ان يكون الامر مقبولا لو انهم منعوه فقط من استخدام عملتهم مرة اخرى لكن ان يصل الامر لحد حجز، او بمعنى اصح، سرقة امواله فذلك غير مقبول تماما.

نعم أخي وذلك أكثر ما يثير استيائي من هذه العملات المستقرة ، هي تتصرف وكأن لها سلطة قانونية رسمية بإمكانها أن تسن قوانينها الخاصة وتمنع الناس من فعل ما يحلو لهم بأموالهم ولا تكتفي بذلك بل يمكن أن تقوم بتجميد أموال أي شخص وسرقته بحجة أنه خالف شروط الاستخدام الخاصة بها.

على الأقل يجب أن يكون تجميد الأموال بطلب رسمي بموجب مذكرة من الحكومة ولا يجوز لهذه الشركات أن تفعل ما يحلو لها.

Quote from: Bitcoin_Arena on November 01, 2025, 11:47:38 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 01, 2025, 11:33:59 PM

I also noticed this. The loading screen and the overall design seems familiar. However, I have noticed the same on many other casinos. So, this doesn’t necessarily mean it isn’t genuine. Maybe just a lack of creativity..

True, I am not accusing them of being a scam or something like that but in order to build a brand name that could potentially grow over time, they need to be honest from the word go and not copy other brands

Anyway, the still have a lot of room in case they want to do any improvement

Sir we have not copied any other brand. If you feel that the design matches with any other brand it is purely coincidence.
We would appreciate rather if you can tell us which brand does it resemble with and as per your expectation what we could have done differently. That will really help us improve.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 01, 2025, 08:59:57 PM

Nice design!
But what I liked the most is the simplicity of creating an account. You just need to provide your email address, then after confirming your email address, you set your password. As simple as that! Creating an account can’t be any simpler than that. I like the sigup process!
I'll check your casino and post my honest review about it later..

Thanks for the appreciation. As a platform we embrace simplicity and transparency and want ourselves to always look approachable to our players rather than dazzle or intimidate them.

Quote from: SquirrelJulietGarden on Today at 02:13:10 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 03, 2025, 11:58:58 PM

It seems he reached an agreement with the Winna team to pay him $5K (although he claims he had more than $80K in his account) at the condition that he marks the scam accusation thread as resolved.

Quote from: panjul07 on November 04, 2025, 02:52:40 PM

Comparing the winning amount to the amount as the final agreement, yes it seems to be unsatisfied outcome but since the player has accepted it then what we can expect as viewer?

The case was resolved according to the user started that scam accusation, and let's read the edited post of that scam accusation. The user admitted that he used card counting technique which is not tolerated by the Winna's Terms of Service.

If he admitted that ToS violation, I think he would accept to don't receive any money but he reached an agreement with Winna, and got $5k for this case. I am not sure why Winna let it happened as they must have tools to detect it and block such violations as fastest as possible. They did not do it in this user case but they should react to this violation more faster in any cases in the future.

Quote from: GambdleGame on October 11, 2025, 11:41:49 PM

Had a long chat with Winna representatives. Max has been very helpful. I do understand both sides here. Yes I have used card counting techniques and understand that this may be against TOS. I would advise everyone to not do card counting online.

The resolution of the problem is still taboo, and I think there is still something awkward and not entirely clear, there are two clauses that collide which makes us lack at the end of the agreement from the perspective that I see and read this case.

But everything is over because both sides from the user who started all this and Winna's representatives who dialogued with the player have discussed to the end and found a common ground that can be agreed upon, no matter how ugly the arguments that were built before because of the $80k issue have finally been resolved, considering that Winna does not want to give victory to its customers and other comments, I understand the annoyance, but it should be said that the clause in this case can be said that the Winna team has successfully resolved this issue.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 03, 2025, 11:58:58 PM

It seems he reached an agreement with the Winna team to pay him $5K (although he claims he had more than $80K in his account) at the condition that he marks the scam accusation thread as resolved.

Quote from: panjul07 on November 04, 2025, 02:52:40 PM

Comparing the winning amount to the amount as the final agreement, yes it seems to be unsatisfied outcome but since the player has accepted it then what we can expect as viewer?

The case was resolved according to the user started that scam accusation, and let's read the edited post of that scam accusation. The user admitted that he used card counting technique which is not tolerated by the Winna's Terms of Service.

If he admitted that ToS violation, I think he would accept to don't receive any money but he reached an agreement with Winna, and got $5k for this case. I am not sure why Winna let it happened as they must have tools to detect it and block such violations as fastest as possible. They did not do it in this user case but they should react to this violation more faster in any cases in the future.

Quote from: GambdleGame on October 11, 2025, 11:41:49 PM

Had a long chat with Winna representatives. Max has been very helpful. I do understand both sides here. Yes I have used card counting techniques and understand that this may be against TOS. I would advise everyone to not do card counting online.

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 02, 2025, 11:39:00 PM

فعلا. منذ ايام قليلة شاهدت فيديوهات على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي لشخص معروف نوعا ما يظهر فيها كيف انه تمكن من ايصال بعض المساعدات لسكان غزة و كان قد جمع ثمن تلك المساعدات من خلال التبرعات. للاسف الطريقة التي اعتمدها في توزيع المساعدات لم تعجبني اذ وضع اسم صفحته على جميع العلب التي ارسلها و بدا و كأن متلقي المساعدات كان يطلب منهم توجيه الشكر اليه.
بعدها بفترة قليلة، قرأت بعض التعليقات من متابعيه هاجموه فيها بسبب عدم شفافيته في نشر المبالغ التي تلقاها و المبالغ التي انفقها و كان يقوم بحضر كل من ينتقده.
لهذا السبب تحديدا نصحت بالانتباه مع من يتم التعامل مهما كان ذلك الشخص مشهورا.

للأسف هذا ما اصبح عليه الأمر بأن مؤثرين على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي يستغلون الازمة الانسانية في غزة لدعم حساباتهم و تعزيز شهرتهم. الوضع حاليا ليس في حالة انفراج و لكن هو افضل حالا بقليل مما كان عليه قبل المصادقة على مشروع ترامب. اليوم قرأت انه يتم العمل على تشكيل قوة من اربعين دولة ستدخل القطاع و تشرف على تسييره لضمان اتفاق الهدنة و تأمين دخول المساعدات. المساعدات فعلا بدأت تدخل بشكل محدود و لكنه افضل من لاشيء بكل الاحوال. اتمنى ان تنتهي هذه المأساة قريبا مهما كان حجم التنازلات لان الخسائر كارثية و لا احد يريد ان تتواصل الحرب و الجميع مهتم بتأمين المساعدات خصوصا مع حلول فصل الشتاء.

هناك دول و حكومات و مسؤولون سياسيون في العديد من البلدان يستغلون القضية الفلسطينية لحشد دعم شعبي لمساندتهم في حملاتهم الانتخابية او لتبييض صورتهم اما الرأي العام. فما بالك بالاشخاص الانتهازيين في الحياة العادية.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 03, 2025, 09:59:29 PM

So, if I’m understanding this correctly, you were able to place a bet even though your balance shows zero. That’s interesting!
If that’s the case, then I believe your bet has already been settled (bets on major leagues usually get settled immediately after the events finish) and what you are experiencing is likely due to a visual glitch or something like that.
This might sound weird, but have you tried to cash out?

To test and make sure that it is not a glitch, try to log in the account on another browser and see whether the same issue happens. If it does not happen on another browser, it is a visual glitch on a first browser.

I am keen on a glitch as if user account can bet while balance is zero, it is actually a severe bug that can be exploited and also possibly harm the casino reputation if they say it is a bug and refuse to pay users. It is better if such bugs don't exist, and perhaps bet105 does not have the bug at all.

The user can try as I recommend and if issue is not resolved, it is only one way, contact support and wait for official answer on this case.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 03, 2025, 11:58:58 PM

Quote from: xLays on November 03, 2025, 11:29:53 PM

I checked the reference link for the negative trust rating feedback and I noticed something strange in that scam accusations thread. OP who made the accusation has already edited their post and it seems like they admitted to card counting. I don't know what's going on.

It seems he reached an agreement with the Winna team to pay him $5K (although he claims he had more than $80K in his account) at the condition that he marks the scam accusation thread as resolved.
Whether you think this is a fair agreement or not is up to you. Many members in that thread believe it’s not a satisfying outcome.
Personally, I think there’s something missing in this story, so I can’t make a fair judgment.

Comparing the winning amount to the amount as the final agreement, yes it seems to be unsatisfied outcome but since the player has accepted it then what we can expect as viewer?
Talking about whether it is fair or not, there will be always pros and cons about this case because there are always 2 PoV.
The player made a mistake which is against the term by doing card counting but after that the player win fairly on the mines game although the player played it with the money which came from the card counting.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 02, 2025, 11:14:14 PM

Quote from: Woodie on November 02, 2025, 10:49:42 PM

Looking at the heading of the thread, it says register and get 50 USDT.. is this in anyway click bait because I didn't get this when I registered (not asking for special treatment either ) Roll Eyes

Or maybe it happened in the early days of XYES being on the forum and players actually got these offers Roll Eyes

if this actually happened, then it was a great offer for anyone that gave this a shot... Perhaps this is still on, on this is based on a deposit offer ??

I might be wrong, but I don’t remember them offering a $50 no-deposit bonus to new registrants when they launched this announcement thread.
If you check the subject of the previous replies carefully, you will notice that they edit it from time to time. When they started this thread, there was no mention of this offer at all. Then they started offering a $30 bonus and later, they increased it to $50.
I guess it’s part of their welcome package offer but it’s certainly not a no-deposit bonus.

Yes. It is updated periodically. They now offer up to $50 USDT on sign-ups, but you have a 40x wagering requirement, and a $25 deposit is required to withdraw the winnings. This may sound a little confusing. If I have to make a deposit, then how is it a no-deposit bonus? Well, you don't have to make a deposit when you claim the bonus. Once you have completed the wagering requirement and unlocked the bonus, you can deposit to become eligible to withdraw the funds.

If I understand correctly, you can only withdraw $50 from the bonus (the $25 is excluded). You need to wager your 25 USD deposit once to withdraw those funds. However, wgaering is a little different at Xyes. Total winnings - Bet amount = Wager.

Quote from: Porfirii on October 31, 2025, 10:08:39 AM

we can start proposing new topics to be translated in November.

Just as a heads-up, until we will pick new topics, fillippone's thread needs at least 5 more translations, and the available languages are the following: [GER] [POL] [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [SPA] [TUR] [UKR] [FIL] [BAN] [POR] [SER] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of cygan, paid2, Zwei / khaled0111, mindrust / mela65, DrBeer, Peanutswar, DS, r_victory, katanic97 and M47AK16.

Also, if anyone wishes to do any translation from topics considered as being finished, the list with all remaining available translations can be found here

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 02, 2025, 10:29:43 PM

I don’t know about arwin or the other members, but I didn’t say I never check my balance. I said I check it from time to time, so I'm not that obsessed with it.
It depends mainly on the game I’m playing. For example, if I’m playing slots, which I play the most, I don’t have to check my balance after every spin. I usually do it only before the session starts and after it ends. I can see how much I won/lost on each spin, so I have an approximate idea of how much I have left in my account balance.

You have a lot of patience in that case, because when I play slots or any other casino game, I tend to check my balance after each bet only to see how much it is. I do check it before I start the session, of course, but then I keep checking it while I'm playing; it's just a habit because I have been doing that since the beginning of my gambling career. I'm not a regular gambler, so I don't gamble a lot, but when I do, I tend to keep an eye on my balance, also because I always spend only a portion of my bankroll in a single session and then stop if I see I'm losing constantly.

I think most gamblers are like me; they can't control themselves so much that they can wait until the session ends before they can see their balance again. We tend to get anxious if we don't see the balance at least after a few bets, only to see how much we have lost already even though we can have an idea based on how much we are betting on each round or spin, but if we are constantly changing the bets, then it can differ.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 02, 2025, 09:38:07 PM

Quote from: Youngrebel on October 29, 2025, 07:10:14 PM

I don't really like that behavior from casinos, if they want to ask for KYC, let them ask at the beginning to f before a gambler deposit funds and not when you win big amount and want to withdraw them frustration just came up to verify the account.

That is probably the fairest approach, especially for customers as they will have the choice whether to complete kyc or just leave and find another casino. This will also allow them to see if their documents will be accepted, complete KYC successfully and resolve any issues before they make a deposit.
However, I can think of many reasons why some service providers don’t do that. They don’t enforce kyc upon registration because they want to make the user experience as smooth as possible (at least until the user makes some deposits and makes his first withdrawal request) and we all know that identity verification can be unpleasant.

The sutiation may change very quicky and no kyc casino can become a kyc casino when you will start to withdraw money.

Quote from: arwin100 on November 01, 2025, 10:59:15 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 31, 2025, 11:59:15 PM

Quote from: danadc on October 31, 2025, 01:55:08 AM

You're right, I hardly ever check my balance when I play I just focus on playing with small amounts and don't look at the balance Sometimes I keep mental track of what I have , but it's necessary to keep track of everything because it's our money If I see that I don't feel good playing or that I'm losing, it's necessary to stop playing That's the only way to avoid losing a lot of money.

Personally, I check my balance after each bet or every other bet, although I have to confess that this can be a bit stressful. The only time I don’t do this is when I play on autobet. In that case, I just set the number of bets and the bet amount so I already know how much I could lose in a worst case scenario and this is way less stressful but also less fun.
Actually, I can understand why some gamblers don’t check their balances regularly. If someone deposits a certain amount of money and he is already ready to spend it all and only cares about having fun, then I don’t see why he has to worry about how much he has spent.

I also check my balance when playing, there's nothing wrong with it and I don't feel any stress doing these things since it will make me aware if its time to stop or not.

Same as you I want to be aware about what's happening and I don't want to exceed on my limit since that is so stressful situation especially if we lose big that we can't afford to lose at that day.

For me it’s a little crazy to never want to check one’s balance even if he is there to spend all his money he would unconsciously want to check his balance to see if he can still continue playing or not. Some may even get a bit anxious seeing how low their balance has gotten.

Quote from: Bitcoin_Arena on November 01, 2025, 11:47:38 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 01, 2025, 11:33:59 PM

I also noticed this. The loading screen and the overall design seems familiar. However, I have noticed the same on many other casinos. So, this doesn’t necessarily mean it isn’t genuine. Maybe just a lack of creativity..

True, I am not accusing them of being a scam or something like that but in order to build a brand name that could potentially grow over time, they need to be honest from the word go and not copy other brands

Anyway, the still have a lot of room in case they want to do any improvement

Why do you say they are copying other brands? Many casinos use the same or similar casino script because you don't need to reinvent the wheel and code a new casino out of the zero unless you need to. Better to use one that companies sell which is already tested and has a good security against hacks.

I don't understand this criticism like they are doing something bad because the website has similar animations on the loading screen. Grin

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:33:59 PM

I also noticed this. The loading screen and the overall design seems familiar. However, I have noticed the same on many other casinos. So, this doesn’t necessarily mean it isn’t genuine. Maybe just a lack of creativity..

True, I am not accusing them of being a scam or something like that but in order to build a brand name that could potentially grow over time, they need to be honest from the word go and not copy other brands

Anyway, the still have a lot of room in case they want to do any improvement

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 31, 2025, 11:59:15 PM

Quote from: danadc on October 31, 2025, 01:55:08 AM

You're right, I hardly ever check my balance when I play I just focus on playing with small amounts and don't look at the balance Sometimes I keep mental track of what I have , but it's necessary to keep track of everything because it's our money If I see that I don't feel good playing or that I'm losing, it's necessary to stop playing That's the only way to avoid losing a lot of money.

Personally, I check my balance after each bet or every other bet, although I have to confess that this can be a bit stressful. The only time I don’t do this is when I play on autobet. In that case, I just set the number of bets and the bet amount so I already know how much I could lose in a worst case scenario and this is way less stressful but also less fun.
Actually, I can understand why some gamblers don’t check their balances regularly. If someone deposits a certain amount of money and he is already ready to spend it all and only cares about having fun, then I don’t see why he has to worry about how much he has spent.

I also check my balance when playing, there's nothing wrong with it and I don't feel any stress doing these things since it will make me aware if its time to stop or not.

Same as you I want to be aware about what's happening and I don't want to exceed on my limit since that is so stressful situation especially if we lose big that we can't afford to lose at that day.

I don't spend all my deposited funds on a casino on single day only because I stop immediately if I'm see that I'm having a long losing streak, then just continue playing maybe on next day or when I'm free to gamble again.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:57 PM

Nice design!
But what I liked the most is the simplicity of creating an account. You just need to provide your email address, then after confirming your email address, you set your password. As simple as that! Creating an account can’t be any simpler than that. I like the sigup process!

I think it's an intentional act for new and some old casinos to make their sign-up process very easy because they expect new users not to find any challenge trying to onboard their platform, so maybe that is not very impressive to me.

I will be more impressed after I try out their deposit process, try to play on their platform, hopefully win, and then try out their withdrawals as well. Those are quite important to me as well as their customer support.

265. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (525 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
266. 396526: ezeminer (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
267. 396591: panjul07 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (384 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
268. 397633: Abiky (Trust: +25 / =1 / -0) (460 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
269. 397737: hilariousetc (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2582 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
270. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
271. 401014: Ultegra134 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (909 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
272. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1287 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
273. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (72 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
274. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (4470 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
275. 405709: ds06 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
276. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
277. 407112: deathdealer1252 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
278. 407892: micromen (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
279. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
280. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
281. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
282. 454323: Raimonn (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
283. 458393: harizen (Trust: # +4 / =1 / -3) (398 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
284. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1518 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
285. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3899 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
286. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
287. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
288. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
289. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +60 / =1 / -0) (2284 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
290. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (367 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
291. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +31 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
292. 529564: hymperion (Trust: neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
293. 532686: nimogsm (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
294. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (5860 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
295. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
296. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1604 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
297. 543626: jackg (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
298. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
299. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (981 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
300. 547991: phishead (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (342 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
301. 551460: swogerino (Trust: neutral) (257 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
302. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust: neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
303. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +8 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
304. 553678: Mr. Big (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
305. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (633 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
306. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust: neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
307. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
308. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (4913 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
309. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
310. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
311. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
312. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
313. 673693: bolinao (Trust: neutral) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
314. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
315. 689964: RariBest (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
316. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (2037 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
317. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: # +15 / =2 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
318. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
319. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (647 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
320. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1773 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
321. 805741: Javi_Anibarro (Trust: neutral) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
322. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +6 / =6 / -0) (774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
323. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (958 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
324. 815246: Murat (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
325. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
326. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
327. 821689: Russlenat (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (564 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
328. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
329. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2730 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
330. 839009: Chiefmonkey (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
331. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (834 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
332. 843320: Komosa (Trust: neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
333. 846936: sabotag3x (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (2306 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
334. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (696 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
335. 857883: Yatsan (Trust: +3 / =5 / -0) (764 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
336. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
337. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
338. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
339. 878630: TheUltraElite (Trust: neutral) (908 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
340. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust: neutral) (2598 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
341. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +135 / =4 / -0) (6293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
342. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust: neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
343. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
344. 885934: SamReomo (Trust: neutral) (552 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
345. 886369: michellee (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (400 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
346. 886521: mk4 (Trust: neutral) (3641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
347. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
348. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
349. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
350. 898928: Theb (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
351. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
352. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (3459 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
353. 906023: poptop (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (746 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
354. 910236: Woodie (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
355. 911663: sompitonov (Trust: neutral) (1104 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
356. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
357. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
358. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (366 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
359. 930597: bobbyclee (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
360. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
361. 935622: devans (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (268 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
362. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
363. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1921 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
364. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
365. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
366. 942911: entebah (Trust: neutral) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
367. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +15 / =5 / -0) (982 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
368. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1189 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
369. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
370. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1032 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
371. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1984 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1286 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (704 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1349 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 988039: Koal-84 (Trust: neutral) (1293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust: neutral) (5878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1297 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
383. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
384. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4923 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
385. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1676 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
386. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Ever-young on October 28, 2025, 09:11:02 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 27, 2025, 11:27:00 PM

Sorry, but I’m not sure what this user is complaining about or why they are complaining in the first place.
He used a centralized service to send a large amount of money from his account to another user’s account, and as part of their AML policies, the service has the right to seize the funds until the user explains he made such a large transaction.
If they don’t do so, whether we like it or not, those services will be used and abused by money launderers/tax evaders/ terrorists...
If you don’t want to get in the same situation then simply don’t use centralized services.

Before going ahead to make use of centralized services, they’re supposed to have known that stuffs like this were most likely to happen right? The exchanges are only doing what they feel is necessary to protect themselves too, because if ever a situation arises where someone is caught using their services for something illegal, the exchange’s reputation might eventually be dragged along. So seizing users’ funds are normal for exchanges.

And we have seen worst cases, I don't know if others will still remember this case,

Quote

The company's CEO and founder, Gerald William Cotten, died in December 2018 after traveling to India. Up to C$250 million (US$190 million) in cryptocurrency owed to 115,000 customers was missing[2] or could not be accessed because only Cotten held the password to off-line cold wallets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadriga_(company)

That is one of the bizarre things that happened in crypto in the past, the CEO died and together with it the money of his customers as he is the only one who have accessed. So don't you forget about it as CEX are really dangerous to put most of our assets as we don't have control of it.

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2025, 10:54:25 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on October 30, 2025, 10:21:39 PM

...

اختلف معك في بعض النقاط اخي.
رغم ان مجال العملات الرقمية غير مقنن في عديد الدول و لا توجد قوانين تنظمه او حتى تمنعه بشكل واضح و صريح، الا ان القوانين يمكن انه يمكن تطبيق قوانين ذات صلة على من يتم القبض عليه و هناك العديد من لقوانين التي يمكن استعمالها مثل تبييض الاموال، تمويل الارهاب، التهرب الضريبي... و غيرها من القوانين التي، للاسف، تكون عقواباتها عادة عقوبات قاسية.
ايضا، لست متأكدا من صحة النقطة التي ذكرتها من كون اجهزة دولة معينة لا يمكنها التواصل مع منصات التبادل للحصول على البيانات اللازمة في حال لم تكن المنصة مرخصة للعمل في تلك الدولة. اعتقد انه يمكن للدولة الوصول الى تلك البيانات عن طريق قنوات اخرى مثل الانتربول و غيره كما لا اعتقد ان اي منصة سترفض التعاون مع احدى الدول حتى ان لم تكن مجبرة قانونيا على ذلك.

تعليقي كان حسب الصيغة التي ورد بها بان نشاط التداول بحد ذاته جريمة بدون التطرق لاي شبهات اخرى قد يكون تم تأكيدها. اجل يمكن للسلطات ان تفتح تحقيقا في شبهة تمويل انشطة اجرامية او غسيل اموال و لكن هذا ليس ابدا اتهاما واضحا ما لم يتم تأكيده. الخبر ورد بان امرأة حققت مكاسب من التداول الذي هو جريمة و هو ما لا يمكن ان يكون معقولا ابدا خصوصا مع عدم وجود ضرر مباشر لاي شخص او جهة خصوصا العملات المشفرة التي لا زجود فعلي لها في قنوات المالية الرسمية للبلد. ان شخصا يتداول العملات المشفرة فهذا بحد ذاته ليس نشاطا تجرمه اي سلطة في العالم، و لكن اذا وشى احدهم انه اشترى بيتكوين من شخص ما فان التهمة تصبح تداول عملات غير مرخصة او اذا ظهرت علامات الثراء فيمكن فتح تحقيق في الثراء غير المشروع، و جميعها لا علاقة لها بالتداول في حد ذاته كما قام صاحب المقال بتجريمه او ربما هي السلطات من قامت بذلك فعلا. عموما لا استغرب شيئا في مصر و بلداننا العربية التي مفهوم العدالة بها مشوه للغاية و يمكن ظلم الناس بسهولة.

بالنسبة للتواصل مع منصات التداول الغير مرخصة فانه يمكن ان يتم فقط عبر الانتربول الذي لا يمكن اقحامه الا في القضايا الدولية. عدى عن ذلك فان اي منصة تحترم نفسها لا يمكن ان تفصح عن بيانات المستخدمين لديها دون موجب قانوني و الا فانها ستخسر سمعتها. يعني مثلا ما الذي قد يدفع بينانس الى التجاوب مع السلطات في مصر اذا كانت ليست هناك قنوات رسمية للتواصل اصلا و الدولة اصلا لا تعترف بالعملات المشفرة او تجرمها. يعني مصر تعتبر التداول جريمة ثم تعتمد على بيانات من منصة تداول. هذا قد يبدو منطقيا و لكنه غير واقعي بالمرة و لم نسمع عن حدوث حوادث مشابهة في اي مكان، باستثناء الجرائم الدولية التي يتدخل بها الانتربول لاجراء و اتمام التحقيقات حتى بمعزل عن سلطات الدول.

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 30, 2025, 11:37:16 PM

Quote from: yhiaali3 on October 30, 2025, 01:53:21 AM

يعني ما الفرق؟ لا أجد صراحة أي فرق العملات المستقرة المركزية شديدة المركزية والتحكم والسيطرة لدرجة أنني البارحة قرأت خبرا مضحكا بأن شركة سيركل الشركة المنشأة

لا اعتقد ان هناك فرق كبير على التقل من الناحية التقنية. الفرق ربما يكون درجة الثقة فعلى الاغلب ستكون الثقة في العملات المستقرة الرقمية الصادرة عن البنك المركزي لاحدى الدول اكبر.
كلنا نعلم ان هناك عمليات تحيل كبيرة تقوم بها الشركات المالكة للعملات الرقمية المستقرة اضافة لعدم الشفافية بخصوص الاصول التي من المفترضا ان تكون داعمة لعدد العملات التي تم طباعتها. على الاغلب لن يتم ذلك مع العملات التابعة للبنوك المركزية.

Quote

للعملة المستقرة USDC أصدرت قرارا يمنع حاملي العملة من شراء "سكاكين" بواسطة USDC Huh

تخيل هذا!!! ممنوع عليك أن تشتري سكين (لأنها ربما تعتبر سلاح بنظرهم) ولكن بغض النظر كيف يحق لشركة تصدر النقود من أن تمنع المستخدمين من شراء حاجيات معينة؟

امر مضحك بالفعل! هل هناك مصدر رسمي لهذه المعلومة اخي يحيى؟

نعم بالطبع أخي خالد هذا هو رابط الخبر:

Quote

Using USDC to purchase weapons of any kind, including but not limited to firearms, ammunition, knives, explosives, or related accessories are prohibited by Circle’s terms.

https://peakd.com/hive-167922/@badbitch/circle-terms-prohibits-purchasing-knives-with-usdc-this-cannot-be-our-future-4c3

كما ترى أخي أنهم يحظرون شراء أي نوع من الأسلحة بما فيها السكاكين

ليست المشكلة في حظر السكاكين واعتبارها نوع من الأسلحة فقط ولكن المشكلة أن تقوم شركة خاصة ليست لها أي سلطة قانونية أو قضائية بتحديد مايمكن شراؤه وما لايمكن شراؤه، والأمر لن يقتصر على ذلك فحسب بل إذا اكتشفوا أنك خالفت شروطهم سيقومون بمعاقبتك وتجميد أموالك ومنعك من إجراء المعاملات

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 27, 2025, 08:57:25 PM

Quote from: GeerieErik on October 26, 2025, 04:45:02 PM

But is VPN also not allowed if the user is from a legal country and has a verified account? I just like to browse with a VPN for my own privacy, is it allowed then?

Snip

That is True the use of a VPN in most cases is used by Gambler's that their countries are prohibited by Casinos based on the perception of the Casino towards such a country or region. So there is no need for anyone who's country or region that is not prohibited by a Casino to use any Using a VPN from a country that is not prohibited will make such a person suspicious which may lead the casino from taking action such as restricting the account of such a person.

Quote from: mitchr4 on October 25, 2025, 11:15:16 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 25, 2025, 10:13:44 PM

Quote from: Dr.Osh on October 25, 2025, 09:45:45 AM

I have made my first deposit and of course it was processed well, I also did not forget to claim the 100% bonus which only requires 6X wager which I think is not too difficult to achieve

I guess this is exactly what triggered their kyc system.
A new user makes a deposit, claims the deposit bonus, completes the wagering requirement (which is not that hard to fulfill) and then makes a withdrawal request.
Any anti-cheating system will flag this as suspicious activity and therefore trigger the KYC process.
It’s normal as those systems are designed to prevent abusers from taking advantage of bonuses and kyc is the only way to identify cheaters.

I also have some concerns about the bonuses offered, as Epicbet provides two types of no-deposit bonuses: a 20 USDT no-deposit Sportsbook Bonus and a 20 USDT no-deposit Casino Bonus, both of which have very low wagering requirements. This might allow some people to meet the wagering conditions, including myself, as I only succeeded with the Sportsbook. I have never made a deposit before and only relied on the bonus funds to make a withdrawal. It feels strange that even those who have made a deposit are being asked to complete the KYC verification. Do we have to forfeit all the bonuses to be able to withdraw, or is there another way to do so without fulfilling the KYC request?

If the casino already requires KYC right from the deposit stage, I think that means the casino is being honest with their users from the start,
which I believe shows that they have nothing to hide from the users who will use their platform.

Rather than those where at the beginning others think there's no KYC, but in the end they only find out when they're about to withdraw. At least with this approach,
from the very first deposit, their new users have the choice to continue or not.