khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: yhiaali3 on Today at 02:24:43 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 25, 2025, 11:56:23 PM

المقالات التي اشرت لها اخي يحيى تذكرني بمقالات "وفاة البيتكوين" او "نهاية البيتكوين" التي اعتدنا ان نراها كل ما انخفض سعر البيتكوين في السنوات الماضية. كنت اضحك في السابق عندما اقرأ هذه المقالات و هو نفس الشي الذي افعله حاليا.

نزول سعر البيتكوين تحت سقف المائة الف امر محبط حقيقة لكنه كان امرا متوقعا. كلنا كنا نعلم ان ذلك سيحدث لكن لم نكن نتمنى ذلك.
هل هذا يعني نهاية البيتكوين؟ بالتاكيد لا. و اي شخص يقول عكس ذلك، هو شخص لا يفهم اصلا ما هو البيتكوين.
هل سيرتفع السعر مجددا؟ بالتأكيد، لكن متى سيحدث ذلك هو امر لا يمكن التنبؤ به و خاصة التنبؤ بمتى سيتمكن البيتكوين من تجاوز عتبة المائة الف دولار مجددا!

أوافقك أخي خالد ، نعم نسمع الكثير من هذه العبارات عند كل هبوط قوي للبيتكوين وتبدأ المقلات بالظهور في الانترنت حول "موت البيتكوين" أو "انهيار سوق الكريبتو" أو "نهاية الفقاعة" ومثل هذه الترهات ولا داعي للقول أنهم يفشلون في كل مرة ويخيب أملهم.

طبعا لا أستبعد أن يكون قسم كبير من هذه الشائعات من ترويج الحيتان أنفسهم ليشتروا بأرخص سعر لكن بغض النظر كل حاملي البيتكوين لا يأبهون بكل هذا ويعلمون جيدا أنها مسألة وقت فقط قبل أن يعاود الارتفاع مجددا.

البيتكوين بدأ بالتعافي قليلا واليوم لامس 88 ألف تقريبا وهو مؤشر ربما لعودته إلى 100 ألف قريبا إن شاء الله.

صحيح الضجيج يأتي بعد كل هبوط أو صعود و بعده نشهد تفاعل عدد كبير من مستخدمي التشفير هناك من يشعر بأن عملة البتكوين و صلت إلى الإنهيار تام و قسم أخر من المجتمع يعتبر الحدث مناسب للإستثمار لأنهم يعلمون أن سوق سيشهد نوع من التعافي بمجرد تغريدة يتم تغيير سلوك البشر تجاه إستثماراتهم.
من خلال قرأتي لعدد ردود الإخوة البعض لم يجد أي تفسير للأنماط المتداولة أو دورات و أسباب إنحراف مسار السعر نزولاً و صعوداً. نعم إن المؤثر المباشر في حركة السعر هو سطر أوامر البيع و الشراء هذا يعني أن تجار التجزئة هم من يقومون بتحديد السعر من خلال طلبات البيع و الشراء أتمنى أن تكون الفكرة واضحة للجميع.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 25, 2025, 11:56:23 PM

المقالات التي اشرت لها اخي يحيى تذكرني بمقالات "وفاة البيتكوين" او "نهاية البيتكوين" التي اعتدنا ان نراها كل ما انخفض سعر البيتكوين في السنوات الماضية. كنت اضحك في السابق عندما اقرأ هذه المقالات و هو نفس الشي الذي افعله حاليا.

نزول سعر البيتكوين تحت سقف المائة الف امر محبط حقيقة لكنه كان امرا متوقعا. كلنا كنا نعلم ان ذلك سيحدث لكن لم نكن نتمنى ذلك.
هل هذا يعني نهاية البيتكوين؟ بالتاكيد لا. و اي شخص يقول عكس ذلك، هو شخص لا يفهم اصلا ما هو البيتكوين.
هل سيرتفع السعر مجددا؟ بالتأكيد، لكن متى سيحدث ذلك هو امر لا يمكن التنبؤ به و خاصة التنبؤ بمتى سيتمكن البيتكوين من تجاوز عتبة المائة الف دولار مجددا!

أوافقك أخي خالد ، نعم نسمع الكثير من هذه العبارات عند كل هبوط قوي للبيتكوين وتبدأ المقلات بالظهور في الانترنت حول "موت البيتكوين" أو "انهيار سوق الكريبتو" أو "نهاية الفقاعة" ومثل هذه الترهات ولا داعي للقول أنهم يفشلون في كل مرة ويخيب أملهم.

طبعا لا أستبعد أن يكون قسم كبير من هذه الشائعات من ترويج الحيتان أنفسهم ليشتروا بأرخص سعر لكن بغض النظر كل حاملي البيتكوين لا يأبهون بكل هذا ويعلمون جيدا أنها مسألة وقت فقط قبل أن يعاود الارتفاع مجددا.

البيتكوين بدأ بالتعافي قليلا واليوم لامس 88 ألف تقريبا وهو مؤشر ربما لعودته إلى 100 ألف قريبا إن شاء الله.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 19, 2025, 10:58:49 PM

اتمنى ان لا يتكرر حدوث مثل هذا الخلل مرة اخرى، رغم انه لا يوجد اي ضمان لذلك، لكن يجب التفكير بجدية بايجاد حل بديل اقل مركزية او على الاقل خطة بديلة للتقليل من الخسائر باكبر قدر ممكن.

المشكلة يا صديقي ان هناك فعلا بدائل متوفرة و ربما البعض منها لا يقل كفاءة عن cloudflareلا و صار اكيدا ان cloudflare ليست على تلك الدرجة من الكفاءة. المشكلة الاخرى او بالاحرى المفاجأة الاخرى ان ما حصل مؤخرا سيتكرر و ربما باضرار اكثر مادامت كبرى المواقع تستعمل نفس الخدمة اي ان الضرر لو حدث فسيكون كارثيا. هل هناك من يمدنا ببيانات او حتى مجرد توقعات عن حجم الخسائر التي تكبدتها شركات و ربما افراد اؤضا بسبب حالة الشلل التي اصابت سوق الانترنت لعدة ساعات؟ من المفترض ان تقديرات موضوعية يمكنها تقدير ذلك و الاكيد ان العملية لم تمضي بسلام كما قد يعتقد البعض.

بالنسبة للمنتدى فانه من المؤسف ان يتم صرف ملايين الدولارات لتطوير نسخة جديدة من تطبيق المنتدى التي فشلت في المهد، و لا يتم انتداب مطورين لتوفير حلول للمشاكل التي يساعد cloudflare على حلها.

Quote from: LeyMonte on Today at 03:56:41 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 24, 2025, 10:57:52 PM

As far as I know, even the results of virtual games are generated randomly (just like any other luck-based game), so I don�t really see how these insiders could have known the outcomes. The only explanation I can think of would be that these games are rigged in the first place znd that�s why the results could be known beforehand.

It is definitely rigged, that's why they know the results in advance. I have read many comments about the results of virtual games before and heard a little about their scams. They do this by cheating gamers. There is always doubt about the results of virtual games and the insiders handle it in such a way that no one can understand.

I don�t think it was. I�m saying this because the amount they charged for their subscription in the group where they posted the �crash game prediction� was ridiculously cheap, I mean it wasn�t even up to $20 and they claimed that it was a sure prediction.

Casino games results are generated randomly and even if you work backend I don�t think you�ll be able to know what the result will be for a particular period of time.

Those claiming to have something to do with rigging are all just trying to scam people off their little subscription fee, they don�t have any insider information to share for that low fee.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 24, 2025, 10:57:52 PM

As far as I know, even the results of virtual games are generated randomly (just like any other luck-based game), so I don�t really see how these insiders could have known the outcomes. The only explanation I can think of would be that these games are rigged in the first place znd that�s why the results could be known beforehand.

It is definitely rigged, that's why they know the results in advance. I have read many comments about the results of virtual games before and heard a little about their scams. They do this by cheating gamers. There is always doubt about the results of virtual games and the insiders handle it in such a way that no one can understand.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 24, 2025, 11:59:47 PM

Quote from: logfiles on November 24, 2025, 11:32:15 PM

Bitpanda.com is an old crypto exchange. I think I remember coming across it a couple of years when I had just gotten into crypto. It's not that popular, that's why so many people don't know about it but it has been around for a while.
Their Wikipedia page states that it was founded in 2014, so way older than betpanda.io. So this is not like the 1xbet - 1xbit scenario.

Thank you for the details, logfiles.
I�m pretty sure many users may mistype "betpanda" as "bitpanda", which made me wonder how betpanda can protect its users against such mistakes, in case bitpanda or any similar website decides to take advantage of this?
I�m not saying that this is going to happen, but what if? What might make things a bit more complicated is that the bitpanda domain name was registered before betpanda, as you said!

Well, first of all, users themselves should be more careful before entering any address in the address bar, and to be honest, I doubt that there are many careless users who would confuse betpanda.io with bitpanda.com. As you can see, these sites differ not only in their second-level domains but also in their top-level domains. Moreover, if users want to find the Betpanda site, they will obviously expect to see a gambling platform, not an Austria-based and European-regulated crypto & securities broker platform, which is what bitpanda is.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 24, 2025, 11:59:47 PM

Quote from: logfiles on November 24, 2025, 11:32:15 PM

Bitpanda.com is an old crypto exchange. I think I remember coming across it a couple of years when I had just gotten into crypto. It's not that popular, that's why so many people don't know about it but it has been around for a while.
Their Wikipedia page states that it was founded in 2014, so way older than betpanda.io. So this is not like the 1xbet - 1xbit scenario.

Thank you for the details, logfiles.
I�m pretty sure many users may mistype "betpanda" as "bitpanda", which made me wonder how betpanda can protect its users against such mistakes, in case bitpanda or any similar website decides to take advantage of this?
I�m not saying that this is going to happen, but what if? What might make things a bit more complicated is that the bitpanda domain name was registered before betpanda, as you said!

Lol, I assure you, whatever the hell Bitpanda is, I'm sure it's a hell of a lot safer than betpanda.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:32:53 PM

^^
I understand your frustration but three days is not that very long period. Some cases take weeks to get resolved.
As long as they are responding to your messages and explaining what is missing or what is wrong with the documents you have provided and why they were rejected, there is still hope that your issue will be resolved. Just try to remain as calm as possible. You should also remain cooperative and provide all the information they request. If you do so and your case still doesn�t get resolved, only then you can start posting complaints publicy. jmo.

The problem is double standards,
When you lose a lot of money, every deposit and withdrawal goes quickly, they know you have gambling problems, and they don't make problems. And they want your money and they want to cash in on your addiction.

When you won the money, they delay and suddenly ask for KYC, a gray area, hoping while they are looking for any way to delay the payment, that you will gamble away that money.

People need money for food, rent, and they invent groups of excuses, even though I sent 10 documents where it is obvious that everything is regular and that I am a real person and that I have given all the correct information. Sent bank statement, internet account, mobile account, salary statement, etc. If they really wanted real and convenient KYC, they would have video verification like most normal casinos where everything goes automatically and you can do it in 30 minutes.

Quote from: Ruttoshi on Today at 08:48:53 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 23, 2025, 11:59:34 PM

Quote from: Agbe on November 22, 2025, 07:14:26 PM

Personally for me I don't like using free bets or even bonuses to gamble because the conditions attached to some of these free bets are just too much. Because even if you win you have to wager to get your winning which at the end of the day you lose both your winning and the extra money used in wagering. These are just calculated efforts by Casinos in making people to bet the more and nothing else body should be moved about bonuses and free bets because there's nothing special about it.

I just read the 2UP representative�s reply to your post in which he explained the requirements for this promotion, and to be honest, it seems fair.
Besides, claiming bonuses is not mandatory to be able to play at the casino. So, if you don�t like the requirements or think they are unfair, simply ignore the promotion and don�t claim the bonus and go straight to playing your favorite games. This way, you won�t need to wager your deposit more than usual.

Yea, that's what I do. When there's a promotion that I don't want to participate in due to some personal reasons, I ignore it after reading, make my deposit and have fun for a while. Whatever promotion or bonus a casino is on, is a thing of choice.

Same here, I seldom claim promotional stuff and bonuses, I only take bonuses if the requirement is fair, since, I had experienced claiming bonusess and found out that it has an extremely hard wagering requirement. (My bad, though, by not reading the requirement first)

Quote from: Ruttoshi on Today at 08:48:53 AM

Personally, I think the bonus requirements are fair enough because people can abuse it. If you're participating with a sincere heart, you wouldn't see it as a big deal but to try your luck. However, gamble with the amount of money that you can afford to lose.

But other casinos give a wagering requirement that is impossible to achieve, especially when they limit the game to be played for the wagering requirement. We understand that it is for the casino protection but some casinos implement an extremely impossible requirement as if the bonus is a trap to deplete players fund in a much easier way. Grin

Quote from: 2UP.io on Today at 06:48:57 AM

Previous claimers can claim the new promotion no problem BUT people are not allowed to set up multiple accounts to claim the same promotion multiple times.

Thank you for answering my inquiries.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 07:37:26 PM

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 07:32:06 AM

However, a gambler needs to look for certain information, such as restricted regions, KYC rules, and bonus rules. These are the most important terms that a gambler should look for. You know, sometimes KYC casinos advertise themself as no KYC. When you ask them about it, they will tell you that they are no KYC for regular players. But if they suspect anything, they may ask for a KYC.

That�s correct, but to be compleyely safe, what you need to do (and what you should always do before signing any contract) is to focus on the fine print because that�s where the devil hides. Unfortunately, most gamblers/customers, even when they read the service rules, they don�t pay much attention to the details. Fortunately, based on my own experience, this usually isn�t a big problem since most casinos have almost the same ToS. So, as you said, you only need to focus on the parts that concern you or that you are interested in (again, no harm in spending few minutes to read the full terms, just in case!).

Many gamblers do not read terms of use including kyc policy. They register account and making deposits without checking the kyc.
They know about kyc only when they start to withdraw money.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 09, 2025, 09:51:35 PM

Quote from: NewCryptocasinos on November 09, 2025, 02:35:58 PM

No i haven't, but i know one of the founders of this casinos, and know that he has a long and professional track record in this industry.
So its legit, but i have to agree, its nothing special by the look of it.

So, you are advertising this casino and you added it to your �best bitcoin casinos� list without even trying it first, you did that just because you personally know its owner?
Sorry and with all due respect, this makes me question how reliable this list is since it�s based on personal opinions and not on real user experience.
A frienly advice, you need to personally test those casinos before adding them to your list.

This is the more reason why I usually never take casino rating, reviews like this serious because they are never founded on user experience but on mere sentiments, I myself could wake up one morning, come here on this forum and create my one list of top 20 casinos simply based on sentiment and emotions and not based on my experience of each of the casinos on the list, as a matter of fact, I may not even be a gambler but simply come up with a list of top casinos for my own selfish reasons..

This is why I've always told gamblers to not take unverified reviews like this seriously because as a matter of fact, some scam casinos may pay an individual some amount of money to make a list like this and place them at that top, and some gamblers out of curiosity may want to try the casino placed at the top gain their first hand experience and in that process end up getting scammed.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 23, 2025, 11:35:36 PM

Such casinos that are truly no-kyc are rare and if you are lucky enough to find one, you can be sure that aside from not asking for identity verification, there isn�t much else interesting about them. These casinos usually don�t offer any ineresting bonuses or promotions because they know such offers will be heavily abused by alt accounts and they won�t be able to do anything about it.
If you value your privacy, then these casinos are the way to go but you will need to forget about the juicy bonuses you could find elsewhere.

All that you said here are 100% true, and it's one major disadvantages this no kyc have, because since they don't want to be taken advantage of, they will not be giving any exciting offers that casinos that are kyc conscious normally do, since anyone can register a dozen of account, just to get that particular offer or welcome bonus that comes along with registration of new accounts, or already an existing offers. So you are 100% right about this, so it's left for we the gambler to decide if we value our privacy more, than giving out our details in other to have Access to all those exciting offers that comes with a mandatory kyc casinos.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 23, 2025, 09:47:11 PM

Congratulations on the successful giveaway and congratulations to all the winners, especially MrjonesAA!
I noticed that this participant, MrjonesAA, won four out of the ten prizes and that�s really impressive!
However, this made me wonder whether it wouldn�t be more fair if each participant was eligible to win only one prize. In the giveaway rules, it says that �each user can only win one of the first three prizes� (source). Why is this restriction applied only to the first three prizes? Wouldn�t it be more fair if this rule was applied to all ten prizes? This would have given more participants a better chance to be among the winners. jmo.

I can understand why they let players to win more than 1 prize because players need to deposit and wager in order to get the entries which means that the more players make minimum deposit+wager for the promo, they get more entries so basically they deserve to win more than 1 prize.
That's a point of view if I stand in the position of those players who did extra effort and risk for this promotion, if they have no chance to win more than 1 prize then they will not do extra efforts.
Of course from other point of view, I also understand that some participants want to win one of the prizes with less entries and they hope for 1 user 1 prize only.
About the rule that the restriction is applied to the first 3 prizes only, I think it is to make the promo more attractive as it will be less attractive if they allow a single user win all the top 3 prizes.

Quote from: dimonstration on Today at 07:03:54 AM

Quote from: mitchr4 on November 23, 2025, 04:43:53 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 22, 2025, 10:59:13 PM

Sorry OP, but haven�t you noticed that no one seems to be interested in the promotion you are advertising here? You have been posting about these promotions for months, but not a single member has even replied. Don�t you think there might be something wrong with your advertising strategy?
Just saying because it seems like you are wasting your time without getting the desired results. A friendly advice, better consider changing your advertising strategy!

IMO, there's nothing wrong with the promotions he shares here. He actually consistently reminds forum users about ongoing or upcoming promotions, even if he doesn't get any feedback.
Participating in a promotion doesn't always have to be shown through replies. Users can simply visit the site and participate without leaving a comment.
I also noticed there are around 1.9k users online on his site, so I believe some of them are probably taking part in the promotion.

Honestly, this is the first time to see this casino ANN thread up on the first page on gambling board probably due to lack of posting interaction of other member aside from OP that regularly bump it.

I�m surprised that this casino ANN thread was created last 2022 and still operating now.

@OP is there any exclusive bonus you can offer for the first time user of Bitcointalk forum?

Yes, we have a unique offer, but only for new users:

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 23, 2025, 11:59:34 PM

Quote from: Agbe on November 22, 2025, 07:14:26 PM

Personally for me I don't like using free bets or even bonuses to gamble because the conditions attached to some of these free bets are just too much. Because even if you win you have to wager to get your winning which at the end of the day you lose both your winning and the extra money used in wagering. These are just calculated efforts by Casinos in making people to bet the more and nothing else body should be moved about bonuses and free bets because there's nothing special about it.

I just read the 2UP representative�s reply to your post in which he explained the requirements for this promotion, and to be honest, it seems fair.
Besides, claiming bonuses is not mandatory to be able to play at the casino. So, if you don�t like the requirements or think they are unfair, simply ignore the promotion and don�t claim the bonus and go straight to playing your favorite games. This way, you won�t need to wager your deposit more than usual.

Yea, that's what I do. When there's a promotion that I don't want to participate in due to some personal reasons, I ignore it after reading, make my deposit and have fun for a while. Whatever promotion or bonus a casino is on, is a thing of choice.

Personally, I think the bonus requirements are fair enough because people can abuse it. If you're participating with a sincere heart, you wouldn't see it as a big deal but to try your luck. However, gamble with the amount of money that you can afford to lose.

Quote from: mitchr4 on November 23, 2025, 04:43:53 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 22, 2025, 10:59:13 PM

Sorry OP, but haven�t you noticed that no one seems to be interested in the promotion you are advertising here? You have been posting about these promotions for months, but not a single member has even replied. Don�t you think there might be something wrong with your advertising strategy?
Just saying because it seems like you are wasting your time without getting the desired results. A friendly advice, better consider changing your advertising strategy!

IMO, there's nothing wrong with the promotions he shares here. He actually consistently reminds forum users about ongoing or upcoming promotions, even if he doesn't get any feedback.
Participating in a promotion doesn't always have to be shown through replies. Users can simply visit the site and participate without leaving a comment.
I also noticed there are around 1.9k users online on his site, so I believe some of them are probably taking part in the promotion.

Honestly, this is the first time to see this casino ANN thread up on the first page on gambling board probably due to lack of posting interaction of other member aside from OP that regularly bump it.

I�m surprised that this casino ANN thread was created last 2022 and still operating now.

@OP is there any exclusive bonus you can offer for the first time user of Bitcointalk forum?

Quote from: lionheart78 on November 23, 2025, 09:14:14 PM

Quote from: 2UP.io on November 23, 2025, 11:26:33 AM

Hi there

The promotion was done a few weeks ago, the full details are on the second post of this thread.

We will do another one soon in a week or 2.

Are the previous members who claimed the previous promotion able to claim this one, too? Or is it just for the first timer on the platform?

Quote from: 2UP.io on November 23, 2025, 11:26:33 AM

Quote from: Agbe on November 22, 2025, 07:14:26 PM

Personally for me I don't like using free bets or even bonuses to gamble because the conditions attached to some of these free bets are just too much. Because even if you win you have to wager to get your winning which at the end of the day you lose both your winning and the extra money used in wagering. These are just calculated efforts by Casinos in making people to bet the more and nothing else body should be moved about bonuses and free bets because there's nothing special about it.

Yes you are right so it is good to read the terms of the deal.

I think the deal we had before was not bad though. Basically you get 10$ free, if you want to withdraw you make a deposit equal to your balance and wager it 5x.
So you can play for free, if you get lucky and turn the 10$ into 50$ then you deposit another 50$ and wager 250$, sounds quite normal, you would generally wager 5x your money, its not like 200% first time deposit bonus that has big rollover because casinos need to protect from bonus hunters.

See the second post for full details.

The withdrawal requirement for this bonus sounds reasonable to me. I have seen other casinos implement bonuses, but one needs to drain his deposit first and start using the bonus fund before the wagering requirement to be able to withdraw countdown starts

Previous claimers can claim the new promotion no problem BUT people are not allowed to set up multiple accounts to claim the same promotion multiple times.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 23, 2025, 11:59:34 PM

Quote from: Agbe on November 22, 2025, 07:14:26 PM

Personally for me I don't like using free bets or even bonuses to gamble because the conditions attached to some of these free bets are just too much. Because even if you win you have to wager to get your winning which at the end of the day you lose both your winning and the extra money used in wagering. These are just calculated efforts by Casinos in making people to bet the more and nothing else body should be moved about bonuses and free bets because there's nothing special about it.

I just read the 2UP representative�s reply to your post in which he explained the requirements for this promotion, and to be honest, it seems fair.
Besides, claiming bonuses is not mandatory to be able to play at the casino. So, if you don�t like the requirements or think they are unfair, simply ignore the promotion and don�t claim the bonus and go straight to playing your favorite games. This way, you won�t need to wager your deposit more than usual.

Yes that is correct

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 09:47:11 PM

Quote from: CasinoBet on Today at 04:38:01 PM

[/b]All 10 winners announced! Congratulations! 🍾
...

Congratulations on the successful giveaway and congratulations to all the winners, especially MrjonesAA!
I noticed that this participant, MrjonesAA, won four out of the ten prizes and that�s really impressive!
However, this made me wonder whether it wouldn�t be more fair if each participant was eligible to win only one prize. In the giveaway rules, it says that �each user can only win one of the first three prizes� (source). Why is this restriction applied only to the first three prizes? Wouldn�t it be more fair if this rule was applied to all ten prizes? This would have given more participants a better chance to be among the winners. jmo.

I�m also in support of this. If they had restricted it to one player with a maximum of one prize and nothing more it would have increased the winners to the actual 10 and not just 5.

I came late to the contest, and honestly if I had contested in it and got the 200 minimum entries required and then saw that one player won more than 2 prizes I won�t be happy at the organizers because it would look as if they weren�t fair to the participants.

This is just a suggestion, if a contest like this is being held in the nearest future - the reward should be restricted to just one player per prize so that a wider range of player will get to win the prize and.

Quote from: mitchr4 on Today at 04:43:53 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 22, 2025, 10:59:13 PM

Sorry OP, but haven�t you noticed that no one seems to be interested in the promotion you are advertising here? You have been posting about these promotions for months, but not a single member has even replied. Don�t you think there might be something wrong with your advertising strategy?
Just saying because it seems like you are wasting your time without getting the desired results. A friendly advice, better consider changing your advertising strategy!

IMO, there's nothing wrong with the promotions he shares here. He actually consistently reminds forum users about ongoing or upcoming promotions, even if he doesn't get any feedback.
Participating in a promotion doesn't always have to be shown through replies. Users can simply visit the site and participate without leaving a comment.
I also noticed there are around 1.9k users online on his site, so I believe some of them are probably taking part in the promotion.

You�re absolutely right! That�s exactly how it is, because I do receive feedback from the forum and I can see it. Thank you, have a great day!

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 22, 2025, 10:59:13 PM

Sorry OP, but haven�t you noticed that no one seems to be interested in the promotion you are advertising here? You have been posting about these promotions for months, but not a single member has even replied. Don�t you think there might be something wrong with your advertising strategy?
Just saying because it seems like you are wasting your time without getting the desired results. A friendly advice, better consider changing your advertising strategy!

Hi, I�m just notifying people about the weekly and other promotions � some message me in DMs and so on. Thanks for the advice.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 22, 2025, 10:59:13 PM

Sorry OP, but haven�t you noticed that no one seems to be interested in the promotion you are advertising here? You have been posting about these promotions for months, but not a single member has even replied. Don�t you think there might be something wrong with your advertising strategy?
Just saying because it seems like you are wasting your time without getting the desired results. A friendly advice, better consider changing your advertising strategy!

IMO, there's nothing wrong with the promotions he shares here. He actually consistently reminds forum users about ongoing or upcoming promotions, even if he doesn't get any feedback.
Participating in a promotion doesn't always have to be shown through replies. Users can simply visit the site and participate without leaving a comment.
I also noticed there are around 1.9k users online on his site, so I believe some of them are probably taking part in the promotion.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 21, 2025, 09:59:25 PM

Quote from: yhiaali3 on November 21, 2025, 02:11:54 AM

...

المشكل ان القائمين على هذه الدول يعلمون جيدا انهم لو واصلوا على هذا النهج فانهم يفتحون الباب للمخالفين و الناشطين في الاقتصاد الموازي و المتحيليين و.و.و..و يوفرون لهم طريقا سهلا لتبييض اموالهم بدون المرور عن طريق القنوات القانونية. فقط تخيل تاجر مخدرات يمتلك اموال طائلة في دولة معينة، لكن لا يمكنه صرف او التصرف في تلك الاموال، ثم يعلم انه يمكنه تصري كل ما يملكه عن طريق العملات الرقمية، فقط لانه مجال غير مقنن، هل تتصور انه سيتردد في القيام بذلك؟
عدم تقنين هذا المجال هو في حد ذاته فتح للباب لكل انواع المخالفين. لكن للاسف، من سيدفع الثمن في النهاية هم المستخدمون العاديون.

هذا هو بالضبط ما يحصل في سوق الممنوعات عموما و لان قطاع الكريبتو غير مدعوم فانه ليس اصلا من الممكن تتبع حركة الاموال بين المهربين و حرفائهم. كذلك اصبح الامر اسهل كثيرا بما ان تحويل الاموال لم يعد بنفس الصعوبة كالتي تتطلبها النقود الكلاسيكية سواء كاش او في شكل تحويلات. سوق المخدرات حول العالم مثلا لابد و انه يستعمل العملات المشفرة لاتمام الصفقات، و بما ان ليس كل الدول لديها البنية التحتية الاستراتيجية اللازمة فان هذا القطاع منتعش جدا في الدول التي يغيب فيها الاطار التنظيمي.

ما رأيك في دول هي نفسها تستعمل العملات المشفرة لاتمام صفقات مع دول و منظمات دون ان تكون منظمة للقطاع او معترفة به على الاطلاق. هناك حالات حصلت ان تتم قرصنة انظمة لبعض الدول و يتم طلب فدية بالعملات المشفرة فتضطر الدولة الى دفع الفدية بالعملات المشفرة بطرق لاتنظيمية لانها لا تملك الجهاز القانوني اللازم لذلك. انها مفارقة عجيبة و يا ريت السياسيين يعتبرون منها و يقرون بسياسة الامر الواقع.

391. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
392. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
393. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
394. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
395. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
396. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
397. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
398. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4952 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
399. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1719 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
400. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
401. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
402. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust: neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
403. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2466 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
404. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2790 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
405. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
406. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
407. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
408. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
409. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
410. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
411. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
412. 1105709: spider703 (Trust: neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
413. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
414. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1165 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
415. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1939 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
416. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
417. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (688 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
418. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
419. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
420. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust: neutral) (2369 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
421. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
422. 1137750: bavicrypto (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (154 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
423. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust: neutral) (2638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
424. 1153445: BitcoinBunny (Trust: neutral) (2851 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
425. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1786 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
426. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1362 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
427. 1164586: gpfrag (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (14 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
428. 1166480: Julien_Olynpic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4513 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
429. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
430. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (2214 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
431. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (527 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
432. 1173695: sAj1420 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
433. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1566 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
434. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1165 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
435. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (18868 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
436. 1192397: paxmao (Trust: neutral) (1613 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
437. 1202061: chimk (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (714 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
438. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1672 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
439. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
440. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust: neutral) (7895 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
441. 1237522: Plutosky (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4888 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
442. 1239916: ZipReg (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (835 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
443. 1248164: fruktik (Trust: neutral) (625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
444. 1260847: creep_o (Trust: neutral) (1001 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
445. 1269701: cryptoaddictchie (Trust: neutral) (1476 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
446. 1275282: joniboini (Trust: neutral) (1847 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
447. 1283017: masulum (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1741 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
448. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +55 / =0 / -0) (579 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
449. 1292764: notocactus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4670 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
450. 1297306: haloxon (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (525 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
451. 1362086: conilmionome (Trust: neutral) (1278 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
452. 1385147: ILuckyGuyI (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (637 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
453. 1392550: zeki555 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
454. 1410401: dkbit98 (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (8322 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
455. 1422438: Paolo.Demidov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2520 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
456. 1433865: witcher_sense (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (4434 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
457. 1452494: UserU (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (562 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
458. 1464056: Mrstacy (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
459. 1478835: MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +55 / =0 / -0) (3081 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
460. 1541583: sky999 (Trust: neutral) (780 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
461. 1545702: DeepMining76 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
462. 1564795: Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
463. 1573369: casperBGD (Trust: neutral) (1152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
464. 1574226: mu_enrico (Trust: neutral) (2256 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
465. 1583465: Dernoste (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
466. 1593137: famososMuertos (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (3652 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
467. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (3187 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
468. 1644820: bitcoiner24h (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (105 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
469. 1646968: temarazin (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
470. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (1342 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
471. 1681586: RickDeckard (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3205 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
472. 1695463: Speculatoross (Trust: neutral) (353 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
473. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (3616 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
474. 1750589: TopTort777 (Trust: neutral) (1563 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
475. 1762404: Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (962 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
476. 1764764: esmanthra (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (732 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
477. 1775670: bubbalex (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (339 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
478. 1781771: Mbitr (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1327 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
479. 1803753: Kylapoiss (Trust: neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
480. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
481. 1855828: taikuri13 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1713 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
482. 1856285: ~~Leviathan.007~~ Banned! (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (722 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
483. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2374 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
484. 1883627: shasan (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1382 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
485. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
486. 1903411: BITCOIN4X (Trust: neutral) (1192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
487. 1926710: Renato297 (Trust: neutral) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
488. 1932205: CucakRowo (Trust: neutral) (593 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
489. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
490. 2000200: 1Dq (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
491. 2003707: kawetsriyanto (Trust: neutral) (1153 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
492. 2004043: Zwei (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (965 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
493. 2005913: Corrosive (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
494. 2033515: mikeywith (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (7109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
495. 2072197: livecoins (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
496. 2087138: Bitcasino.io Support (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (1751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
497. 2136362: TalkStar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (737 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
498. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +9 / =6 / -0) (7521 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
499. 2148411: DIKUL (Trust: neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
500. 2154195: Nikisa (Trust: neutral) (217 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
501. 2160117: Harkorede (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (1003 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
502. 2168312: yhiaali3 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2356 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
503. 2178170: Sayeds56 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (748 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
504. 2204241: ICOEthics (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (892 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
505. 2221613: FontSeli (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (858 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
506. 2243418: alanst (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
507. 2359691: Helana (Trust: neutral) (71 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
508. 2376653: Coyster (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1404 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
509. 2403910: Spokanistan51 (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
510. 2423488: Upgrade00 (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (2779 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
511. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (991 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
512. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3782 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
513. 2503677: BC.GAME (Trust: +7 / =3 / -0) (195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
514. 2514450: rxalts (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (353 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
515. 2527697: Soonandwaite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2044 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
516. 2551755: Sat0shisGhost (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
517. 2578892: Jawhead999 (Trust: neutral) (1270 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Weekly update (2025-11-14_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1763086094 1 5565389.msg66045473 2168312 1012655
1763085514 1 5564190.msg65994696 3719408 3727988
1763084975 1 178336.msg66045852 198573 252510
1763084775 1 178336.msg66045631 198573 64507
1763083938 1 178336.msg66045838 198573 33156
1763083933 1 178336.msg66045826 198573 87930
1763083920 1 178336.msg66045622 198573 1027694
1763083914 1 178336.msg66045607 198573 1067333
1763083724 2 5564874.msg66023218 3466646 3492563
1763083521 1 178336.msg66045838 64507 33156
1763083135 1 5182222.msg66030457 549786 839568
1763081926 1 5562026.msg66015973 3370434 3579336
1763080575 5 5565125.msg66044680 11425 2775483
1763080438 5 232519.msg66044514 1068464 3669573
1763080405 5 5253221.msg66037288 347141 839568
1763080312 5 631891.msg66044090 1068464 3513442
1763080267 4 5565187.msg66037625 347141 839568
1763078408 1 178336.msg66044285 252510 998490
1763078272 1 178336.msg66044130 252510 128156
1763078149 1 5565248.msg66039622 1091302 3552586
1763077282 1 2542231.msg66044057 894012 333827
1763077265 1 2542231.msg66025233 894012 1155166
1763077154 2 5535269.msg66045552 33156 3253914
1763077099 1 178336.msg66045607 33156 1067333
1763076431 2 5560573.msg65966355 3526976 3500874
1763076227 1 178336.msg66045607 64507 1067333
1763076124 1 178336.msg66045607 1027694 1067333
1763076117 1 5412657.msg65621336 1852120 3579677
1763076111 1 5549712.msg65579248 1852120 3579677
1763076106 1 5549201.msg65567438 1852120 3579677
1763076098 1 5548861.msg65556013 1852120 3579677
1763076084 1 178336.msg66045607 18321 1067333
1763076071 1 5562928.msg65954853 1852120 3579677
1763076027 1 5412657.msg65620926 1852120 3696100
1763076007 1 5548777.msg65550689 1852120 3696100
1763075982 1 5412657.msg65607820 1852120 3686607
1763075978 1 5487753.msg65586891 1852120 3686607
1763075974 1 5544549.msg65422722 1852120 3686607
1763075970 1 5376945.msg65936084 1852120 3686607
1763075965 1 5487753.msg65920013 1852120 3686607
1763075952 3 5565375.msg66044759 1068464 3558380
1763075888 1 5412657.msg65585697 1852120 3698708
1763075879 1 5412657.msg65583064 1852120 3638006
1763075877 3 5565392.msg66045563 1068464 1247226
1763075852 1 5132720.msg65232281 1852120 252510
1763075848 1 5132720.msg65232231 1852120 3698708
1763075842 1 5132720.msg65583062 1852120 3698708
1763075823 1 5536004.msg65197035 1852120 3638006
1763075817 1 5535922.msg65193818 1852120 3638006
1763075782 1 5412657.msg65582160 1852120 2034734
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (53 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2622 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 14 Nov 2025 03:08:14 AM CET, yhiaali3 (history) sent 1 Merit to khaled0111 (history) for مستخدم يدفع 100.000$ عممولة لعملية تحويل.
On Fri 14 Nov 2025 02:58:34 AM CET, TypoTonic (history) sent 1 Merit to Webutxo (history) for Scam trick to password reset with phising link using 'rn' instead of 'm'.
On Fri 14 Nov 2025 02:49:35 AM CET, Hueristic (history) sent 1 Merit to JayJuanGee (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 14 Nov 2025 02:46:15 AM CET, Hueristic (history) sent 1 Merit to philipma1957 (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 14 Nov 2025 02:32:18 AM CET, Hueristic (history) sent 1 Merit to vapourminer (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (559 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8035 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 828 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3735277: pricklypierre13 (history) earned: 8 Merit.
3735413: Squiggle (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3735529: intheb0x (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3735576: coinrifft (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3735669: pandakitty (history) earned: 2 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3730996: Pikiboy
3730998: Mabebe
3731047: PepeLapiu2
3731126: Akkaali
3731190: AuchanX
3731248: Abelly
3731496: Mvtech
3731565: tomasaurifer
3731567: VIP police talk
3731944: BTCissointeresting
3732183: Luke_Later
3732187: tipscikrds
3732269: User_CBCBF
3732285: Pumpsta
3732402: sc404
3732435: efla19
3732458: Queen uloma
3732496: Charcol
3732607: adailtonafa
3732655: TSen
3732951: Gabrim
3732958: Fmceyhan25
3732990: NodeMystic
3733034: Xyloo
3733082: PhilosopherKing
3733333: stay_determined
3733455: ramheat1
3733546: PorkyP
3733653: Olotu20
3733747: The Founding Titan
3733954: SpadIta
3733974: Veenie
3734097: Saltysugar99
3734106: ScalpCandy
3734139: Bitcoinisfreedom12112
3734178: Drippy Bet
3734203: darwinsz
3734294: Halifat
3734397: konopaki12
3734485: Hashura
3734531: Nasdel4
3734829: Trobbio
3734880: q7naistar
3735005: Bishop9921
3735259: ArabBTC
3735277: pricklypierre13
3735413: Squiggle
3735529: intheb0x
3735576: coinrifft
3735669: pandakitty

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8035
4:0:828
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:723
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14040:13721
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:300
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1412
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3730996:1:2
3730998:1:2
3731047:1:2
3731126:0:14
3731190:2:5
3731248:0:2
3731496:0:1
3731565:0:1
3731567:0:6
3731944:0:1
3732183:0:4
3732187:0:1
3732269:0:3
3732285:0:10
3732402:0:2
3732435:0:1
3732458:0:3
3732496:2:4
3732607:0:5
3732655:0:3
3732951:0:3
3732958:0:3
3732990:0:2
3733034:0:5
3733082:0:5
3733333:0:13
3733455:0:2
3733546:0:3
3733653:0:4
3733747:0:1
3733954:0:5
3733974:0:1
3734097:0:1
3734106:0:1
3734139:0:1
3734178:0:3
3734203:0:2
3734294:0:4
3734397:0:3
3734485:3:8
3734531:0:3
3734829:0:1
3734880:0:3
3735005:0:3
3735259:0:9
3735277:0:8
3735413:0:1
3735529:0:1
3735576:0:1
3735669:0:2

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50552
Sample

Code:

1. 19370 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 729 unique users in 10560 transactions
2. 19351 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1081 unique users in 11106 transactions
3. 18868 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9970 transactions
4. 14846 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 475 unique users in 8583 transactions
5. 13721 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1211 unique users in 4893 transactions
6. 12369 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 686 unique users in 8267 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11203 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 647 unique users in 6419 transactions
9. 11166 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 479 unique users in 6251 transactions
10. 11037 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 589 unique users in 6416 transactions
11. 11016 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 557 unique users in 4317 transactions
12. 10331 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 497 unique users in 5453 transactions
13. 9824 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 561 unique users in 5583 transactions
14. 9521 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 325 unique users in 4880 transactions
15. 9210 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 618 unique users in 4949 transactions
16. 9087 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 508 unique users in 4242 transactions
17. 9068 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 332 unique users in 3213 transactions
18. 8947 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 381 unique users in 3174 transactions
19. 8923 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 441 unique users in 4470 transactions
20. 8771 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 407 unique users in 4783 transactions
21. 8492 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 518 unique users in 3906 transactions
22. 8398 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 571 unique users in 4804 transactions
23. 8352 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 522 unique users in 4514 transactions
24. 8322 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 448 unique users in 4935 transactions
25. 8233 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 564 unique users in 4813 transactions
26. 8035 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 400 unique users in 871 transactions
27. 7895 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 391 unique users in 4161 transactions
28. 7521 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4109 transactions
29. 7406 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 449 unique users in 4102 transactions
30. 7109 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 401 unique users in 3632 transactions
31. 7077 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 569 unique users in 4205 transactions
32. 6615 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 226 unique users in 1699 transactions
33. 6514 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 273 unique users in 2950 transactions
34. 6429 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 366 unique users in 3250 transactions
35. 6421 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 377 unique users in 3504 transactions
36. 6334 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 473 unique users in 3517 transactions
37. 6310 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 918 unique users in 4087 transactions
38. 6182 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 617 unique users in 3457 transactions
39. 6083 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 194 unique users in 3514 transactions
40. 6030 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 398 unique users in 3497 transactions
41. 6018 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 216 unique users in 3517 transactions
42. 6012 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2628 transactions
43. 5963 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 404 unique users in 3250 transactions
44. 5931 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 450 unique users in 3332 transactions
45. 5891 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 514 unique users in 3433 transactions
46. 5874 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 322 unique users in 2711 transactions
47. 5737 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 223 unique users in 3220 transactions
48. 5492 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 200 unique users in 3150 transactions
49. 5276 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 411 unique users in 2599 transactions
50. 5136 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 362 unique users in 2455 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50503. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50504. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50505. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50506. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50507. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50508. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50509. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50510. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50511. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50512. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50513. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50514. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50515. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50516. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50517. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50518. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50519. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50520. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50521. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50522. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50523. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50524. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50525. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50526. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50527. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50528. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50529. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50530. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50531. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50532. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50533. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50534. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50535. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50536. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50537. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50538. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50539. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50540. 1 Merit received by 0x000369 (#3072101) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50541. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50542. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50543. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50544. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50545. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50546. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50547. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50548. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50549. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50550. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50551. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50552. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26419
Sample

Code:

1. 68345 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 880 unique users in 12246 transactions
2. 64720 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2104 unique users in 27864 transactions
3. 63987 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3290 unique users in 17197 transactions
4. 55510 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4441 unique users in 32021 transactions
5. 55417 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3493 unique users in 53250 transactions
6. 45609 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3560 unique users in 31706 transactions
7. 42332 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2758 unique users in 14868 transactions
8. 41791 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9154 transactions
9. 36681 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2815 unique users in 29710 transactions
10. 36598 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2479 unique users in 13539 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 32845 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1555 unique users in 13508 transactions
13. 31202 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1437 unique users in 10144 transactions
14. 27493 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2043 unique users in 9991 transactions
15. 27256 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1652 unique users in 6480 transactions
16. 26970 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1378 unique users in 6850 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 21562 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1318 unique users in 9159 transactions
21. 20572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6387 transactions
22. 15867 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1917 unique users in 6430 transactions
23. 15379 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 724 unique users in 5657 transactions
24. 15162 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5458 transactions
25. 15143 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1686 unique users in 7059 transactions
26. 14554 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1622 unique users in 3687 transactions
27. 14168 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1139 unique users in 8632 transactions
28. 14040 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1008 unique users in 1623 transactions
29. 13847 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 523 unique users in 6461 transactions
30. 13796 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1271 unique users in 7888 transactions
31. 13372 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1567 unique users in 6778 transactions
32. 12820 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 653 unique users in 3553 transactions
33. 12601 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1316 unique users in 7130 transactions
34. 12557 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1301 unique users in 5787 transactions
35. 12414 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 806 unique users in 4136 transactions
36. 12397 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2904 unique users in 6640 transactions
37. 12382 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1102 unique users in 7491 transactions
38. 12161 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 799 unique users in 5845 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 10317 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 539 unique users in 3933 transactions
41. 10187 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1099 unique users in 5809 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 7952 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3257 transactions
45. 7906 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1009 unique users in 3429 transactions
46. 7704 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 927 unique users in 3392 transactions
47. 7673 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 739 unique users in 6840 transactions
48. 7244 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 563 unique users in 6474 transactions
49. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
50. 6822 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 500 unique users in 3885 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26370. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26371. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26372. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26373. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26374. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26375. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26376. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26377. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26378. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26379. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26380. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26381. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26382. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26383. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26384. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26385. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26386. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26387. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26388. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26389. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26390. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26391. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26392. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26393. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26394. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26395. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26396. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26397. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26398. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26399. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26400. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26401. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26402. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26403. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26404. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26405. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26406. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26407. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26408. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26409. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26410. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26411. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26412. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26413. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26414. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26415. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26416. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26417. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26418. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26419. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 313010 (14.32%)
Tuesday 311911 (14.27%)
Wednesday 312711 (14.31%)
Thursday 333415 (15.26%)
Friday 332365 (15.21%)
Saturday 289512 (13.25%)
Sunday 291552 (13.34%)
Total: 2184476

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 21, 2025, 10:59:05 PM

Quote from: Josefjix on November 21, 2025, 08:07:40 PM

Hello Jackpoker support, I am seeing newly created account joining the special program for Bitcointalk users, there is something wrong I would love to adjust.

In the promotion rules, they clearly say that participants need to send them a personal message on the bitcointalk forum.
Obviously, all the members who posted their applications here are abusers (most likely part of an alt account group and belong to the same person) because they didn�t even bother to read the promotion terms. But OP should have mentioned the promotion terms in his post, or even better, created a dedicated thread for this promotion in the games and rounds section.

Too many newly created accounts trying to claim the free spins offer, you might be correct that they are belong to the same person who try to abuse the bonus. If it is true, I would say that they are so dumb to do it because they need to wager the winning from the FS 30x first before they can request a withdrawal. These new accounts did not even read the rule because they should not post it here as the rule is clear that they should send a PM. Do they also aware that level 2 verification is also required to claim this FS offer? I doubt it simply because who is willing to do KYC just for 30FS?

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 21, 2025, 11:58:41 PM

Quote from: ApesCasino on November 21, 2025, 11:43:58 PM

The games are provably fair and there is a page explaining the algorithm and a verifier to check bets.
But, I can see the fair button is not showing on mobile at the moment. Are you on mobile?

It should show on the bar under the game on desktop view. We are literally working on an updated design for dice which will go live in the next 24 hours which adds the provably fair button to the top of the page on mobile.

Thank you for the quick reply, ApesCasino.
Yes, I�m on mobile and I just tried again and I just switched to the desktop version (still on mobile), but I still can�t find how to verify the bet results or change the client seed (if there is one in the first place).
Also, I couldn�t find the provably fair page you mentioned. Could you please post its link here? This would be very helpful.
Not saying your in-house games are not fair, but I just want to see how your provably fair system works.

If you refresh again on mobile we just uploaded a new design (for desktop too).
You should now see a big yellow button at top left of screen on mobile with provably fair icon that opens a window with two tabs, seed and verify. On the verify tab there's also a link to the provably fair page here https://apescasino.com/provably-fair

On desktop the provably fair button can be found at the bottom right side of each game.

Hope that helps.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:36:36 PM

Weelcome to bitcointalk, ApesCasino!
I just checked your casino and it seems you have some cool in-house games. However, it appears that these games are not provably fair. I checked the whole website and there doesn�t seem to be any mention that the games are provably fair. Even when you open one of the in-house games, there�s no way to verify the fairness of the game (please correct me if I'm wrong).
I don�t think anyone would be interested in those games if they are not provably fair, imo of course!.

Hi, thanks!

The games are provably fair and there is a page explaining the algorithm and a verifier to check bets.
But, I can see the fair button is not showing on mobile at the moment. Are you on mobile?

It should show on the bar under the game on desktop view. We are literally working on an updated design for dice which will go live in the next 24 hours which adds the provably fair button to the top of the page on mobile.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:18:40 PM

Quote from: RedFlix on Today at 09:11:45 PM

منظمة الصليب الاحمر نزيهة و شفافية معاملاتها اكثر من منظمة الهلال الاحمر بعد ان تورطت فروعها حول العالم في شبهات فساد طالت ارصدة مالية و مساعدات مختلفة. هناك مخاوف لدى اسرائيل ان تذهب المساعدات الى حماس و هذا عذر كافي لاعتراضها على دخول المساعدات خصوصا من الهلال الاحمر.

لا اثق في اي من هذه الجمعيات. اتذكر انه منذ مدة خلال الحرب على غزة تم اتهامالهلال الاحمر هنا بسرقة اموال التبرعات لغزة، نفس الشيئ حدث خلال فترة الكورونا. بعا، ذلك لا يقلل من قيمة المنظمة نفسها بشيئ، بل القائمون عليها هم من شوهوا صورتها.
كما قلت، لا اثق في اي من هذه المنظمات حتى الصليب الاحمر، و لدي تحفظات كثيرة على هذه المنظمة.
بالنسبة للجمعيات الناشطة في الضفة الغربية، اتمنى ان تتمكن من تلبية احتياجات سكان الضفة الغربية اولا و بعدها لنرى كيف يمكنهم ايصال المساعدات لغزة و عبور مئات الحواجز في حين تعجز منظمات دولية عن ذلك مثل الجمعيات و المنظمات التابعة للامم المتحدة او المتعاملة معه.

لا اعرف عن اي منظمات يقصد بالضبط لانه حسب علمي فان الضفة الغربية نفسها تحتاج الى مساعدات و المساعدات الدولية تكون السلطة الفلسطينية هي المسؤولة عن استقبالها و توزيعها و هي بالكاد تكفي اجور الموظفين و حتى الخدمات فجميعها تأتي من اسرائيل. بالنسبة للمنظمات الانسانية الدولية الغير حكومية فهي غالبا لا تستطيع النشاط ضمن نطاق الاراضي المحتلة لان هذا يتطلب تراخيص من الجانب الاسرائيلي الذي بكل تأكيد لن يمنحها شيئا تحت نفس التعلة المعروفة "شبهة تمويل منظمات ارهابية" و التي مقصود بها الفصائل المقاومة.

الهلال الاحكر و الصليب الاحمر كلاهما منظمات انسانية عالمية و لكن هذا لا يمنحهما نزاهة من اي نوع او انهما خاليتان من ملفات الفساد. هناك خور في كل مكان و امكانية التلاعب واردة مهما كان الهدف انسانيا او نبيلا. المشكلة مع هذه المنظمات هو صعوبة كشف التلاعب بسبب غياب الشفافية اللازمة. يعني لو لا يحصل تسريب معطيات من داخل المنظمة فانه لا احد يمكنه اكتشاف اي تلاعب بما غي ذلك السلطات نفسها.

Quote from: Dr.Osh on November 19, 2025, 10:48:55 PM

Quote from: Beparanf on November 19, 2025, 10:38:27 PM

Quote from: Bitinity on November 16, 2025, 05:18:04 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 15, 2025, 10:39:19 PM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on November 15, 2025, 09:13:42 PM

But it seems that more users are paying attention to this tournament because so far the lowest multiplier is 253.4x for 10th place while there are still 26 hours left. Just curious, any forum users participating in this week's tournament?

Sorry, but what makes you think there is more interest in this contest (aside from the lowest recorded multiplier)?
Not saying that there isn�t much interest in this contest or that it isn�t attractive, but I�m curious to know why you think it has gained more attention just recently. Just asking because your input can very helpful for the contest organizers.
btw, if you are lucky enough, you can beat that 253x multiplier after just a few spins!

Basically it is true that there is more interest (at least they have more players now) in this weekly multiplier contest compared to when I was still actively participating in the early months. It can be seen from the number of participants and its multipliers. In the past, I could even win on the top 5 with multiplier under 50x especially in the first few rounds of this weekly multiplier contest. Now the contest give more paid places (from 5 to 10) while every week, it is like that any multiplier below 100x will not have a chance to be on the top 10 unlike in the early days.

I remember that sweet days on Casinopunkz weekly multiplier contest including the monthly wagering contest that rewards handsomely on many participants.

Before, you can the top spot when you have x300 to x500 multiplier since only few participate probably due to high minimum bet 1�.

I believe the current contest will be more lively if the minimum bet will be bring down to 0.1� or 0.2�.

I haven't been active playing at casinopunkz for quite a while, and as you said if the minimum bet was $0.2, casinopunkz would definitely get more attention, because a $1 bet seems to make people think about joining because most players only have relatively small capital for 100 spins, they already spend $100, but if the minimum bet is lowered to $0.2, a capital of $20 is enough to join and it depends on luck

That�s also what I do as a gambler here in the crypto gambling industry, where I always make a 0.2$ bet and I only put a limited amount of funds in my bankroll balance,
which is between 30�40$ . It�s limited to that amount, and once it�s all used up, I stop right away.

But if you know any casino here in the crypto casino space where the minimum bet amount is 0.1$ , maybe you could share it so I can also try gambling there.
Usually, only 0.2$ minimum bet casinos are available, not 0.1$

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 13, 2025, 11:58:28 PM

المنتدى بلا شك هو حدث مهم و اكيد ستنتج عنه عديد الشراكات و ربما حتى مشاريع جديدة.
هل هذه هي النسخة الاولى من هذا المنتدى او انه تم تنظيم نسخ سابقة منه في بلدان اخرى؟
السؤال الاهم هو لماذا تم اختيار روسيا بالذات لاحتضان هذا الحدث الضخم؟
قائمة اهم الشركات المشاركة في الحدث تبدو غريبة بعض الشيئ بالنسبة لي، فعلى حسب علمي، بعض ان لم يكن اغلب هذه الشركات تفرض عقوبات على روسيا و تمنع المستخدمين الروس من استخدامها بسبب الوضع هناك!
اتمنى ممن لديه اطلاع اكثر على هذا الشأن ان ينيرنا حول هذا الموضوع. فالمفروض عند تنظيم مثل هذه المنتديات ان يتم اختيار المكان المناسب الذي يوفر ارضية جيدة لاطلاق شراكات و مشاريع جديدة و لا اعتقد ان الوضع السياسي و الامني في روسيا يحقق تلك الشروط.

لا أعرف صراحة إن كان هناك نسخ سابقة من هذا المنتدى تحديدا لكن يبدو أنه امتداد لمنتدى Blockchain Life الذي تم تأسيسه في دبي عام 2017 وتم عقده مرتين في موسكو عامي 2021-2022 وعقد عدة مرات في دبي وكذلك سيعقد العام المقبل 2026 في دبي

أما لماذا تم اختيار روسيا بالذات لاحتضان هذا الحدث الضخم فلا أعرف السبب لكنني أخمن أن روسيا هي من تسعى لاحتضان هكذا مؤتمرات كنوع من الالتفاف على الحصار المفروض عليها وجذب الشركات ورجال الأعمال للحضور إلى روسيا وبما أنه لايوجد جهة رسمية دولية مسؤولة عن المؤتمر فيمكن لأي دولة أن تستضيفه بدون ممانعة

وكما تعلم فإن روسيا في السنوات الأخيرة أبدت انفتاحا كبيرا تجاه البيتكوين والعملات المشفرة في محاولة للتخلص من العقوبات الأمريكية والغربية المفروضة عليها وبالتالي فإن استضافة هكذا مؤتمرات فرصة كبيرة لروسيا

Quote from: Beparanf on Today at 10:38:27 PM

Quote from: Bitinity on November 16, 2025, 05:18:04 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 15, 2025, 10:39:19 PM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on November 15, 2025, 09:13:42 PM

But it seems that more users are paying attention to this tournament because so far the lowest multiplier is 253.4x for 10th place while there are still 26 hours left. Just curious, any forum users participating in this week's tournament?

Sorry, but what makes you think there is more interest in this contest (aside from the lowest recorded multiplier)?
Not saying that there isn�t much interest in this contest or that it isn�t attractive, but I�m curious to know why you think it has gained more attention just recently. Just asking because your input can very helpful for the contest organizers.
btw, if you are lucky enough, you can beat that 253x multiplier after just a few spins!

Basically it is true that there is more interest (at least they have more players now) in this weekly multiplier contest compared to when I was still actively participating in the early months. It can be seen from the number of participants and its multipliers. In the past, I could even win on the top 5 with multiplier under 50x especially in the first few rounds of this weekly multiplier contest. Now the contest give more paid places (from 5 to 10) while every week, it is like that any multiplier below 100x will not have a chance to be on the top 10 unlike in the early days.

I remember that sweet days on Casinopunkz weekly multiplier contest including the monthly wagering contest that rewards handsomely on many participants.

Before, you can the top spot when you have x300 to x500 multiplier since only few participate probably due to high minimum bet 1�.

I believe the current contest will be more lively if the minimum bet will be bring down to 0.1� or 0.2�.

I haven't been active playing at casinopunkz for quite a while, and as you said if the minimum bet was $0.2, casinopunkz would definitely get more attention, because a $1 bet seems to make people think about joining because most players only have relatively small capital for 100 spins, they already spend $100, but if the minimum bet is lowered to $0.2, a capital of $20 is enough to join and it depends on luck

Quote from: Bitinity on November 16, 2025, 05:18:04 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 15, 2025, 10:39:19 PM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on November 15, 2025, 09:13:42 PM

But it seems that more users are paying attention to this tournament because so far the lowest multiplier is 253.4x for 10th place while there are still 26 hours left. Just curious, any forum users participating in this week's tournament?

Sorry, but what makes you think there is more interest in this contest (aside from the lowest recorded multiplier)?
Not saying that there isn�t much interest in this contest or that it isn�t attractive, but I�m curious to know why you think it has gained more attention just recently. Just asking because your input can very helpful for the contest organizers.
btw, if you are lucky enough, you can beat that 253x multiplier after just a few spins!

Basically it is true that there is more interest (at least they have more players now) in this weekly multiplier contest compared to when I was still actively participating in the early months. It can be seen from the number of participants and its multipliers. In the past, I could even win on the top 5 with multiplier under 50x especially in the first few rounds of this weekly multiplier contest. Now the contest give more paid places (from 5 to 10) while every week, it is like that any multiplier below 100x will not have a chance to be on the top 10 unlike in the early days.

I remember that sweet days on Casinopunkz weekly multiplier contest including the monthly wagering contest that rewards handsomely on many participants.

Before, you can the top spot when you have x300 to x500 multiplier since only few participate probably due to high minimum bet 1�.

I believe the current contest will be more lively if the minimum bet will be bring down to 0.1� or 0.2�.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 17, 2025, 08:59:12 PM

Sorry if this is a bit off-topic and I�m not trying to defend Wina here, but don�t you think they would never have considered taking this case to court if they knew they were at fault?

nope, but they were not threatening to sue him over the win that they didn't want to pay, they were threatening to sue him over the scam accusation he posted. i doubt they were actually going to go through with that, it was just a scare tactic imo to get him to agree to the "deal", and it kinda worked since he took the post down.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 17, 2025, 08:59:12 PM

As I said earlier, one of the main reasons service providers ask customers to complete kyc (they usually do this right before banning the account) is to profile cheaters. In this case, they simply wanted to know who that person was so they can deal with him in person.

fair enough.

Quote from: khaled0111 on November 17, 2025, 08:59:12 PM

It�s a complicated case. You may think what they did was unethical, while someone else may say they were within their rights to do so in order to protect their business.

both can be true at the same time, to protect their business they do unethical shit.

Quote from: Mahdirakib on Today at 11:39:18 AM

Looks like the post bumpers are really helping this thread to appear at the top. As a result, it is getting the attention of other forum members, and the forum members are continuously making discussions here.

at least there aren't that many shilling accounts anymore (unless their posts get deleted before i see them).

Quote from: Mahdirakib on Today at 11:39:18 AM

Everyone is discussing about KYC and No-KYC related things, but no one is talking about the NoToKYC.com services. Does any of you agree with listing system of NoToKYC? They are providing inaccurate information about the KYC verification requirement of the casinos.

i think i made my opinion about NoToKYC crystal clear, their listing system is bullshit.