khaled0111's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned khaled0111 in the past 7 days

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 20, 2026, 11:20:52 PM

^^
هذا بالضبط ما يحدث خي kavelj. قد تبدو تصريحات ترامب و تغريداته مثيرة للسخرية و اي شخص قد ينعته بالمعتوه، لكن هل تعتقد فعلا ان شخصا بمثل هذه المواصفات يمكن ان يصل ليكون رئيس الولايات المتحدة؟ حتى ان افترضنا انه شخص مخبول و وصل بطريقة ما لهذا المنصب، هل تعتقد ان كل من يعمل في ادارته هم اشخاص مخبولون مثله او انهم مسلوبو الارادة لدرجة ان يتحكم فيهم شخص مثل هذا؟

أنا لا أعتقد أن ترامب مخبول بالشكل الذي يجعله يقوم بمشاريع اعتباطية. هناك استراتيجية مدروسة بلا شك و الدليل هو انه لا يلاقي معارضة من الكونغرس و لا حتى في صلب ادارته. ما اراه ضربا من اللامعقولية هو اصدار مواقف على سوشيال ميديا لا تعكس حقا الموقف الامريكي و لا وضوح السياسات. مثال ذلك كان اعلان بدء الضربة العسكرية على ايران في نفس الوقت الذي كانت فيه مفاوضات جارية كان ترامب نفسه وصفها بالمثمرة. هل وظيفة الرئيس في أمريكا اصبحت تشتيت الرأي العام و تجهيز الأمريكان لمفاجأة الحرب؟

Quote from: avp2306 on April 20, 2026, 09:48:05 PM

Quote from: Obim34 on April 20, 2026, 05:58:30 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:34:40 PM

You didn’t but I did.
Try to solve this, please:
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/04/18/UfJx35.jpeg
This one is from Vega registration page.
Clicking on 00 then 3G, won’t solve the capcha, btw.

Try to request for another image and see.

I may not like the captcha update, I'm still logged in so i haven't experience how tough it is, but it is not nice if i have to struggle to access my account, I won from the Vega raffle, If they should release our wins, I won't be happy going through the stress.

Captcha can still be implemented but not this hard, they should relate back to the captcha update.

I didn't get much issues on their captcha but looking at situation which their are several people complains about it, maybe its time for them to pay attention and maybe try to upgrade this. Since people really getting stress especially if they can't enter immediately then those captcha gives lots of stress to people that will try log in on their casino.

They may try to look at the captcha implemented by Bitcointalk or try other smooth ones, since people want convenience and not want to get stress for something unimportant.

You are right. A casino's login process needs to consider security as well as user convenience. Extra-difficult and repetitive captchas are often very annoying. Especially when I want to log in to my account quickly, it seems quite annoying to me. People may get annoyed by something like this and choose another site. That's why casino companies should pay attention to these. However, you are right that having a relatively simple but effective captcha system like Bitcointalk will not ruin the user experience.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 20, 2026, 11:20:52 PM

ترامب يمكن ان يكون مباشرا و صريحا لدرجة لا يمكن لاي شخص ان يصدق انه صريح و مباشر لتلك الدرجة، لكن في نفس الوقت يستطيع ان يخلف ابسط وعوده و ينقلب على اقرب حلفائه بدون اي سبب يذكر. ترامب شخص مخبول، هذا مما لا شك فيه، لكنه ظاهرة تستحق الدرس.

أوافقك الرأي إلى حد كبير أخي خالد في هذه النقطة، فعلا ترامب شخصية تستحق الدراسة إنه مباشر وصريح لدرجة أنه لا أحد يصدقه
الناس معتادة على المجاملة والنفاق خاصة في السياسة وعندما يأتي شخص صريح ومباشر بهذا الشكل فإن الناس لا تصدقه أو تتهمه بالجنون هو لا يخاف من أي شيء لذلك لايخفي أي شيء فمثلا نراه يستهزئ بكثير من رؤساء الدول مباشرة أمام الشاشة دون أن يهتم بالبروتوكولات والمجاملات الرئاسية التي تحكم العلاقات بين الدول

وأيضا تراه يغرد على منصته الاجتماعية بما يفعله أو ينوي فعله بشكل مباشر ودون خوف أو مجاملة وهذه الأمور التي تحدث في الغرف السرية لمخابرات الدول فمثلا تكلم صراحة وعلنا كيف أخذ نفط فنزويلا وأصبح ملكا للولايات المتحدة حتى في مجال البيتكوين كما تذكرون قال بما معناه أنه من الجيد أن نمحي كل ديون أمريكا مقابل "شيك كريبتو" وضحك الناس عليه وقتها واتهمهوه بالجنون وأنه لايعلم شيء عن البيتكوين لكن في الحقيقة أعتقد أنه كان يعني ما يقول وأنه وجد طريقة جيدة لمحو ديون الولايات المتحدة (حسب ريقته في التفكير) مقابل عملة افتراضية لاوجود حقيقي لها ولايؤمن بها بالأساس لكنه وجدها طريقة جيدة للتخلص من ديون الولايات المتحدة

Quote from: Obim34 on Today at 05:58:30 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:34:40 PM

You didn’t but I did.
Try to solve this, please:

This one is from Vega registration page.
Clicking on 00 then 3G, won’t solve the capcha, btw.

Try to request for another image and see.

I may not like the captcha update, I'm still logged in so i haven't experience how tough it is, but it is not nice if i have to struggle to access my account, I won from the Vega raffle, If they should release our wins, I won't be happy going through the stress.

Captcha can still be implemented but not this hard, they should relate back to the captcha update.

I didn't get much issues on their captcha but looking at situation which their are several people complains about it, maybe its time for them to pay attention and maybe try to upgrade this. Since people really getting stress especially if they can't enter immediately then those captcha gives lots of stress to people that will try log in on their casino.

They may try to look at the captcha implemented by Bitcointalk or try other smooth ones, since people want convenience and not want to get stress for something unimportant.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:34:40 PM

You didn’t but I did.
Try to solve this, please:

This one is from Vega registration page.
Clicking on 00 then 3G, won’t solve the capcha, btw.

Try to request for another image and see.

I may not like the captcha update, I'm still logged in so i haven't experience how tough it is, but it is not nice if i have to struggle to access my account, I won from the Vega raffle, If they should release our wins, I won't be happy going through the stress.

Captcha can still be implemented but not this hard, they should relate back to the captcha update.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:34:40 PM

Quote from: Renampun on April 17, 2026, 09:29:46 AM

I didn't find any problem solving the captcha they created, it wasn't as difficult as I thought, so there shouldn't be any problem with the captcha if someone wants to register.

You didn’t but I did.
Try to solve this, please:

This one is from Vega registration page.
Clicking on 00 then 3G, won’t solve the capcha, btw.

I don't really understand why it doesn't work on your side, but I didn't encounter any issues when solving the captcha. but from what I checked, Vega uses GoCaptcha on their site, and if more people are having issues solving the captcha, they should switch to hCaptcha or they could use Cloudflare Turnstile since they use Cloudflare on their site.

Quote from: Woodie on April 19, 2026, 11:14:35 AM

snip

Just keeping my eyes 👀 peeled for the sportsbook.

Yes, for now Vega only focuses on providing slots and live casino, it would be even better if they were able to provide a sportsbook on their platform because I think that there must be many Vega users who also bet, and with a sportsbook in Vega, users no longer need to play elsewhere because they can bet directly here.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:34:40 PM

You didn’t but I did.
Try to solve this, please:

This one is from Vega registration page.
Clicking on 00 then 3G, won’t solve the capcha, btw.

I think this depends on the captcha provider. Vega should change their provider but if they find this secure the usual ones like what we have in the forum. The captcha the forum has got became better and easier and it keeps the security of each log in. So, maybe if the Vega's management sees that some users are having hard time with the captcha, they might reconsider the suggestion to make it easier for all.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 10:59:26 PM

Quote from: edondoko on April 17, 2026, 09:46:01 PM

Also I do not want to get into the money laundering allegations but I think it's pretty obvious this is heaven for money-laundering. Will get reported too with the proper evidence. Sample batch test of 100K to 90K washed money easier than ever here.

Do you understand that it’s the person making a deposit into services like this one who is more likely to be considered a money launderer? So be ready to explain why you chose this service in particular.

Quote

You idiots think anyone can run a casino and get away with illegal shit. not this time. I couldn't give less fucks how much money he has, makes or will make in the future. Noone is above the law. Especially cross-border and happily I'm not from some random third-world country which is corrupt as fuck.

Your reply would have made more sense if you hadn’t used that discriminatory term "third world". You and where you come from are no better than any user from a low-income country. "The rules apply to all customers regardless of where they come from unless stated otherwise".

Dear Khaled, you don't have to lecture me on what will be thrown upon me on questioning in court hearings or whatever may come. I know full well how to respond and will do so by the side of my lawyer obviously.

What I want to say is everyone and their mom knows this plattform is used to launder money as it has never been easier and more accessible then conventional methods. They damn well know that they allow it and make themselfs complicit in any kind of money laundering going on on their platform. This includes Fireblock as a payment provider.

I already noticed them that I will file a criminal lawsuit and this stuff will get checked and if they are so dumb to continue to provide the wallets for this they can be hold just as accountable. This has nothing to do with my case, this is just facts what can happen when the proper channels get involved and enforcement proceeds.

Why do I say they are complicit?

See their answer to their Licensor. If you are somewhat capable of how law works and how legal answers get interpreted, this is a suicide for Duel and for they payment provider. As per their own statement - they have done everything according to law like doing KYC/AML checks and more.

Now tell me, you casino defending heroes, is this normal? A casino straight up lying about having done this and that?

This is straight up bullshitting and since this is their only legal answer, together with the statements which Monarch did I wish them good luck in front of courts or any revision that takes place after the fact.

My case has nothing to do with this. I don't need the money as I already said. What I'm offering is a settlement to not pursue any further action.

In either way, they are better of settling for half instead of loosing out fully on the illicit gained funds. Why?

Cause ESBK(read upon swiss laws yourself) can and will seize this funds as they are tied to a criminal investigation about illicit gained funds, these fund will not be redirected or given to me, they will literally be seized by the proper enforcement channels here in Switzerland in cooperation with the proper cross-border channels.

Now, I can sue civilly for my money, which won't get far as there is not a single possibility right now to enforce it Anjouan. So what do I do?

Sue Monarch and hold him personally accountable.

You can guess how this will roll out after and what this means for the casino reputation wise, not only that but can you imagine all the alarm bells ringing at the regulatory bodies?

This is not simple hey I lost I want my money back, couldn't care less and if I can't have it rather have my government have it.

It's simply put I want to enforce and hold persons accountible for actions they are doing which are viewed illegal in most if not all countries on this planet.

I understand you guys saying I'm tryna exploit a casino, I really understand it, but put that aside and actually comment on any or all of the other allegations I've made and you'll see it's pretty hard to justify why they are acting like these.

They are basically acting like a non-existent company atp. It's obvious why as apparently it's always the players fault. But many of the points said have nothing to do with me or my case but rather their incompetence and criminal exposure.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 16, 2026, 10:59:16 PM

^^
I’m not sure if the 150 free spins no-deposit bonus is still available or not, but it is certainly worth it. The 100x wagering requirement is indeed a bit high but it’s a no-deposit bonus, so we are talking about free money!

There is no free money, it is a no deposit bonus free spins means that you are able to claim the free spins without making deposit but once you play the FS and win something then you need to complete the wagering requirement using your real balance.
Means that to unlock what you won from the FS, you will have to make a deposit.
Basically there is one other FS bonus (without deposit) that you can claim, it is 100FS on The Dog House but of course the rule is the same.
You will have to make deposit in order to unlock what you won from the FS, so do not even think it is a free money.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:58:47 PM

استسمح كل الاخوة، لكن بما اننا تطرقنا لهذا الموضوع فلدي سؤال اتمنى ان يتم الاجابة عليه سواءا بذاتيةاو موضوعية:
فلنفترض ان تعدين العملات الرقمية و استعمالها في بلد معين ممنوع تماما، فهل تشجع اي شخص من ذلك البلد على التعدين و استعمال العملات الرقمية؟
هنا لا اتحدث عن العواقب و ما يمكن ان يحصل لذلك الشخص، لكن اتحدث من ناحية المبدأ. هل تعتقد ان من حق اي شخص استعمال العملات الرقمية، حتى ان كان ذلك مخالفا لقوانين بلده؟
هل يعتبر ذلك خروجا عن القانون او محاولة لفرض امر واقع؟

من ناحية المبدأ فهذا يعود لسبب حظر البيتكوين, استمتعت للكثير من الندوات وبعض المؤتمرات بخصوص البيتكوين (وبعضها من ناحية شرعية ودينيه) وجميع اسباب حظر/تحريم البيتكوين كانت غير واضحة وفضفاضة كاستخدامه في الجريمة او غسيل الاموال او لان الدول لا تفرض تشريعات او بسبب الغرر والجهالة في سعر الصرف (تذبذب سعر الصرف) وغيرها من الاسباب.
لذلك فطالما ان التعدين يتم حظره لهذه الاسباب فاخلاقيا لا يبدوا ان اسباب حظره مقنعه.

اما من ناحية القوانين فمن النادر ان تقوم الدول بتتبع الافراد داخل منازلهم ومعاقبتهم لفعل شئ ما لذلك فطالما تبقي الامر بخصوصية عالية, تقوم بالتعدين المنفرد عبر جهاز او اثنين ولا تستهلك هذه الاجهزه تيار كهربائي عالي فلن يقوم احد من الشرطة بتتبعك او سجنك.

كل الحالات التي تم القبض فيها علي اشخاص بتهمه التعدين كانوا يديرون نشاط تجاري (حاوية تحتوي عشرات اجهزه التعدين) وبالتالي فحتما هكذا نشاط سهل الرصد وستقوم الحكومات بايقافك.

اذن باختصار طالما ابقيت فمك مغلقا وكان التعدين في نشاط شخصي وليس تجاري وبجهاز او اثنين ودون ازعاج من الجيران فلن يكتشفك احد او علي الاقل لن يتم تطبيق القانون عليك.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:58:47 PM

استسمح كل الاخوة، لكن بما اننا تطرقنا لهذا الموضوع فلدي سؤال اتمنى ان يتم الاجابة عليه سواءا بذاتيةاو موضوعية:
فلنفترض ان تعدين العملات الرقمية و استعمالها في بلد معين ممنوع تماما، فهل تشجع اي شخص من ذلك البلد على التعدين و استعمال العملات الرقمية؟
هنا لا اتحدث عن العواقب و ما يمكن ان يحصل لذلك الشخص، لكن اتحدث من ناحية المبدأ. هل تعتقد ان من حق اي شخص استعمال العملات الرقمية، حتى ان كان ذلك مخالفا لقوانين بلده؟
هل يعتبر ذلك خروجا عن القانون او محاولة لفرض امر واقع؟

السؤال فلسفي بامتياز و يستحق التفكير الى حد كبير في المفارقة بين الممكن و المسموح به. للأسف لا أحد يملك الاجابة بدقة لأن هذا خاضع لثقافة كل شخص و لقناعاته لكن يمكنني اعطاء مثالين اجدهما مفيدان لمزيد التعمق:

المثال الأول: حين تم اتهام الفيلسوف سقراط بالهرطقة و محاولة افساد شباب روما، تم اثناء محاكمته الحكم عليه بالاعدام. المدينة التي احبها سقراط و دافع عن مجدها كاهم حضارة في زمانها تحكم عليه قوانينها بالاعدام. حين جاءه صديقه الذي لديه نفوذ في الدولة و عرض عليه ان يتدخل لمساعدته، رفض سقراط هذه المحاولة بالمطلق متحججا انه لو قبل بالمساعدة فهو بذلك يرفض كل نظام روما الذي كان طيلة حياته يعتقد في فعاليته و بالتالي سيناقض نفسه و يخون مبادئه لو فعل. و فعلا تم اعدام سقراط الذي هانت عليه حياته مقابل الدفاع عن مبادئه.

المثال الثاني: شخص يعتنق دينا او معتقدا يحرم القمار مثلا و يؤمن انه دين الحق. لكنه في نفس الوقت يشتغل في كازينو متحججا بأن الظروف هي من دفعته لقبول الوظيفة. في بلداننا العربية اين مسموح بانتاج و بيع الخمور فان قطاع كبير من الناس يشتغلون في قطاع الخمور. نفس الشيء ينطبق على القروض الربوية. هنا في المنتدى لدينا مسلمون من جميع انحاء العالم ليس فقط الدول العربية و يشاركون في حملات ترويج لكازينوات. هل يجوز تصنيف هؤولاء "منافقين" اذا جاز التعبير؟

أنا شخصيا لا أرى تعارضا في المبادئ حين أخالف النظام الذي أعيش به لأن أؤمن أن ظروفي الخاصة هي فعلا ما يهمني و ليس الحفاظ على سلامة النظام مهما كان نوعه. القناعات باعتقادي كما الأخلاق، لا يمكن أن تكون قاعدة عامة يجوز تعميمها بل لكل مقام مقال.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 15, 2026, 08:27:21 PM

Sorry albon, but as far as I can see, they are just trying to appeal their case again in order to get the ban lifted. I think you are pushing it a bit too far by saying they are trying to bypass the block (they are exercising their right by resubmitting their case for review). This is just my humble opinion for the time being.
I'll need to re-read the whole thread and check all the proof both parties have provided before making a fair judgment.

This seems to be a reasonable reaction by scammers and non-scammers alike. It is probably a standard reaction from people when they are confronted with events such as these, they want to push back.

For example, compare it to an account in the forum that has been banned. The owner creates another account to appeal the ban and persist on trying to have the ban removed as they want to monetise the banned account via signature campaigns and bounties. Eventually, they give up especially if fresh evidence is presented or if they do not receive support. It did not stop them trying.

When accounts are caught cheating a campaign manager or being part of an account farm, they initially push back in the hope of having negative tags removed too. Even if they very little chance of success, it did not stop them trying. I think the conduct by Sirplay and KasyNoir in trying to have their names removed from any blacklist was expected and we should not be surprised. How this is seen by MetaMask is a matter for them.

Quote from: albon on April 16, 2026, 01:17:24 PM

MetaMask will likely spot this easily and reject the request again to protect users. I’m not pushing anything, but to clearly expose these deceptive practices,so the reports I filed can move forward.

MetaMask probably receive many reports about dubious and nefarious websites on a weekly basis. You did you part by reporting them, it will be interesting to see how they respond now that Sirplay have added their reply.

371. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
372. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2068 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
373. 941129: goodpunt (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (106 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
374. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
375. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
376. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (1249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
377. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
378. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
379. 961708: dittoup (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
380. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
381. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
382. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1421 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
383. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (754 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
384. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (1356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
385. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
386. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3393 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
387. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
388. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
389. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
390. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
391. 1015954: aundroid (Trust: neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
392. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
393. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
394. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
395. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
396. 1031572: rdluffy (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1837 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
397. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
398. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
399. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust: neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
400. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
401. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (5133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
402. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2649 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
403. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
404. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust: neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
405. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
406. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
407. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
408. 1080073: Spack17 (Trust: neutral) (291 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
409. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
410. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
411. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
412. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
413. 1105709: spider703 (Trust: neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
414. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2427 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
415. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
416. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust: neutral) (2904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
417. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
418. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
419. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (753 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
420. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1818 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
421. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1410 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
422. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust: neutral) (2370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
423. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
424. 1136512: Xylber (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
425. 1137750: bavicrypto (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
426. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust: neutral) (2823 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
427. 1153445: BitcoinBunny (Trust: neutral) (2876 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
428. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust: neutral) (1786 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
429. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
430. 1164586: gpfrag (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (16 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
431. 1166480: Julien_Olynpic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5042 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
432. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3137 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
433. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (2235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
434. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
435. 1173695: sAj1420 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
436. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1566 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
437. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (18891 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
438. 1192397: paxmao (Trust: neutral) (1635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
439. 1210149: ithd1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
440. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1761 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
441. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
442. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust: neutral) (8543 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
443. 1237522: Plutosky (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
444. 1239916: ZipReg (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (842 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
445. 1260847: creep_o (Trust: neutral) (1001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
446. 1275282: joniboini (Trust: neutral) (1883 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
447. 1283017: masulum (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1838 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
448. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +55 / =0 / -0) (579 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
449. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3342 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
450. 1292764: notocactus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4924 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
451. 1297306: haloxon (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
452. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1511 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
453. 1385147: ILuckyGuyI (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
454. 1392550: zeki555 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
455. 1410401: dkbit98 (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (8616 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
456. 1422438: Paolo.Demidov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2609 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
457. 1433865: witcher_sense (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (4439 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
458. 1464056: Mrstacy (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
459. 1478835: MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +57 / =0 / -0) (3339 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
460. 1541583: sky999 (Trust: neutral) (785 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
461. 1545702: DeepMining76 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (22 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
462. 1564795: Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1285 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
463. 1573369: casperBGD (Trust: neutral) (1152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
464. 1574226: mu_enrico (Trust: neutral) (2372 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
465. 1583465: Dernoste (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
466. 1593137: famososMuertos (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4115 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
467. 1644820: bitcoiner24h (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
468. 1681586: RickDeckard (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
469. 1695463: Speculatoross (Trust: neutral) (353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
470. 1729238: UmerIdrees (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (936 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
471. 1762404: Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
472. 1775670: bubbalex (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
473. 1781771: Mbitr (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
474. 1803753: Kylapoiss (Trust: neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
475. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
476. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2608 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
477. 1855828: taikuri13 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1715 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
478. 1883627: shasan (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (1415 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
479. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2638 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
480. 1903411: BITCOIN4X (Trust: neutral) (1193 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
481. 1926710: Renato297 (Trust: neutral) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
482. 1932205: CucakRowo (Trust: neutral) (593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
483. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
484. 2000200: 1Dq (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
485. 2003707: kawetsriyanto (Trust: neutral) (1181 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
486. 2005913: Corrosive (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
487. 2033515: mikeywith (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (7143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
488. 2129514: VashaUdacha777 (Trust: neutral) (93 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 17, 2026, 11:58:47 PM

استسمح كل الاخوة، لكن بما اننا تطرقنا لهذا الموضوع فلدي سؤال اتمنى ان يتم الاجابة عليه سواءا بذاتيةاو موضوعية:
فلنفترض ان تعدين العملات الرقمية و استعمالها في بلد معين ممنوع تماما، فهل تشجع اي شخص من ذلك البلد على التعدين و استعمال العملات الرقمية؟
هنا لا اتحدث عن العواقب و ما يمكن ان يحصل لذلك الشخص، لكن اتحدث من ناحية المبدأ. هل تعتقد ان من حق اي شخص استعمال العملات الرقمية، حتى ان كان ذلك مخالفا لقوانين بلده؟
هل يعتبر ذلك خروجا عن القانون او محاولة لفرض امر واقع؟

هذا السؤال يثير جدلية أخلاقية وفلسفية برأيي ولا أتوقع أن تجد إجابة موحدة لأن كل شخص لديه رؤية مختلفة من جانب مختلف للمسألة.
البعض يعتبر أنه طالما هناك قوانين تمنع التعدين فهذا يعتبر مخالف للقانون وخروج على الدولة بغض النظر سواء كانت الدولة محقة بقرارها أم لا ، فيما يرى البعض الآخر أن الكثير من قوانين الدولة مجحفة ولا تنصف المواطنين وبالتالي يحق له مخالفة هذه القوانين.

شخصيا لايمكنني الحكم بشكل دقيق في هذه المسألة لأنه على سبيل المثال في بلدي معظم القوانين جائرة والتي وضعها مسؤولون فاسدون مرتشون لايملكون أخلاق أساسا ويعيشون من امتصاص دم الشعب سواء النظام الفائت أم النظام الحالي لم يتغير الوضع، الناس هنا تعيش في فقر مدقع ويبحثون عن أي وسيلة لتحصيل لقمة عيشهم في ظل الغلاء الفاحش والرواتب التي لا تتعدى 100-200 دولار في أحسن الأحوال هذا طبعا بعد الزيادة التي حصلت بنسبة 300% تقريبا على الرواتب
لذلك يمكن القول أنها مسألة نسبية والناس المضطرة ستفعل أي شيء للحصول على دخل إضافي حتى لو كان مخالف لقوانين البلد خاصة إذا كانت الحكومة فاسدة ولا تسد احتياجات المواطنين

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:43:19 PM

Well, let me tell you something, if you choose to ignore forum members’ suggestions, then be prepared to be ignored.
I'll repeat it again, buy a copper membership.

DEMANDING is different from suggestion, just saying

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:56 PM

This is a bit funny but I just took a look at your posts history and it doesn’t seem like you are a person/member who doesn’t know how bitcoin/cryptocurrencies work!

I don’t think my post history is relevant but fair points on the engagement. I believe that apart from me, there are also other newbies on this forum that can benefit from the discussion’s held in this thread i created and even though i might have a little bit of knowledge about how bitcoin/cryptocurrency works ,it doesn’t mean I can’t also hear the views and opinions of other people with far more knowledge and experience than me.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:56 PM

This thread has almost reached its third page but you never bothered to post any updates or address any of the previous comments. This is really very concerning!

I appreciate the concern sir I’ve been keeping up with the thread, just taking time to go through the different perspectives before responding I’ll share a proper update shortly.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:59:56 PM

This is a bit funny but I just took a look at your posts history and it doesn’t seem like you are a person/member who doesn’t know how bitcoin/cryptocurrencies work!
This thread has almost reached its third page but you never bothered to post any updates or address any of the previous comments. This is really very concerning!

This is the third page of the thread the Op have already been active ln other thread on speculation section maybe he just don't see need to reply to the thread or his curiosity have been satisfied which if that's true locking the thread and acknowledging of being satisfied with the replies who have been the best thing to do.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 08:43:19 PM

Sorry, but it has already been two days since you created this announcement thread and you still didn’t realize it’s important to buy a copper membership. Someone already suggested this but it looks like you have simply chose to ignore him.
Well, let me tell you something, if you choose to ignore forum members’ suggestions, then be prepared to be ignored.
I'll repeat it again, buy a copper membership.

I apologize and have purchased the copper membership, information was truly gold by a reputable member and I assure you I did not mean to disregard, I simply missed his comment. Thank you for reiterating very much appreciated.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 16, 2026, 10:59:16 PM

On another note, I understand that the aim from having a captcha is to prevent bots, but the one Vega uses on the registration page is a bit complicated and hard to solve. So I hope they will consider using a more user-friendly capcha system.

The main aim as you said is to prevent bot accounts, which is why captcha is introduced. Maybe another complex captcha is added as you explained because as at the time I signed up in the casino, the captcha is not difficult to pass, it is like normal captcha to me.
The entire registration process is smooth no complex problem encounter and the site have a user friendly interface that makes it easy for new users to easily navigate.

Quote from: malcovi2 on April 16, 2026, 02:21:42 AM

Quote from: malcovi2 on April 15, 2026, 10:23:54 AM

thx for the free juicer Vega

run up the $45 juice to $180

withdraw was super fast now unlike my 1st withdraw before

For the first withdrawal, it is quite normal that it will take longer because the casino will conduct a more in-depth review, but after that, the process will usually be faster.. so congratulations on your win and glad to hear that you had a good experience making your withdrawal.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 16, 2026, 10:59:16 PM

On another note, I understand that the aim from having a captcha is to prevent bots, but the one Vega uses on the registration page is a bit complicated and hard to solve. So I hope they will consider using a more user-friendly capcha system.

I didn't find any problem solving the captcha they created, it wasn't as difficult as I thought, so there shouldn't be any problem with the captcha if someone wants to register.

Quote from: Strongkored on April 16, 2026, 11:42:13 PM

at least as players we can test this casino, how fast it is, and so on, and as players we can channel our desire to play.

Anyone who tested it out got it quickly. But it's still better to experience the speed of its withdrawal for those who are curious of how it will go for them.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 16, 2026, 10:59:16 PM

On another note, I understand that the aim from having a captcha is to prevent bots, but the one Vega uses on the registration page is a bit complicated and hard to solve. So I hope they will consider using a more user-friendly capcha system.

They're looking at this thread and hopefully, all of these concerns will be sent to their technical team. It's good to have these feed back and comment for them to serve their customers better.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 16, 2026, 10:59:16 PM

^^
I’m not sure if the 150 free spins no-deposit bonus is still available or not, but it is certainly worth it. The 100x wagering requirement is indeed a bit high but it’s a no-deposit bonus, so we are talking about free money!

Thanks for responding man, and I very much agree with you, I perfectly understand that the reason why the wager requirement is that high is because the bonus is basically free money, the gambler is risking nothing but simply depending on luck to decide whether or not they walk away with something tangible from the $1000 max win.
And that max win of $1k is also juicy, but I highly doubt it's winnable though..

Well, If I am to go by the date written on the bonus note, I think it's expired already but I will wait a bit to see if the official rep will confirm whether or not the bonus is still active, I really hope it's still active 😋😁

Quote

On another note, I understand that the aim from having a captcha is to prevent bots, but the one Vega uses on the registration page is a bit complicated and hard to solve. So I hope they will consider using a more user-friendly capcha system.

I've not registered on the site yet so I honestly don't know how hard the captcha is to solve, I've actually encountered alot of different captcha and indeed, there are some that are very hard to pass, though I can't describe one I've encountered one time that gave me a really tough time, but I do hope it's not the same type this casino is using again. 😁, and I hope they will listen to you and go for an easier one so long as they all do exactly same job which is keep the bots away.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 11:37:37 PM

Quote from: Russlenat on Today at 10:23:59 PM

If anything gets flagged, then there is probably another reason behind it, like maybe they received a report about a certain deposit address and they need to investigate, then that specific account gets tagged. Sometimes scam casinos use that kind of excuse even when the player did nothing illegal.

Making a deposit, completing the wagering requirement and then immediately requesting a withdrawal is definitely going to raise suspicions, especially if the wagering requirement is too low and easy to fulfill. If this happens only once, it may not trigger the anti-fraud system, but if it keeps happening, then you need to be ready to be asked to verify your identity.

I would not see it as suspicious since it's also some sort of gambling behavior. Some people are looking for a short spike, some short excitement to get their fix, and then withdraw (if there is something left of course).
An issue would arise if some super new account would do something like this. Like deposit 100$, make 1 bet on 1.01, and then withdraw. After that doing the same thing again.
I mean it's not smart business anyway since several casinos have fees for withdrawals. On all of my usdt withdrawals ever on winna they also always charged me 1$ for it. When asking them about it they claimed it's not a 1$ fee and ony the transaction (blockchain) fee, which is total nonsense since transfers on solana for example don't even cost 1 cent. But that's a different story.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:59:16 PM

^^
I’m not sure if the 150 free spins no-deposit bonus is still available or not, but it is certainly worth it. The 100x wagering requirement is indeed a bit high but it’s a no-deposit bonus, so we are talking about free money!

I also think the same, this is just free money, seeing as the wager requirements are high, the chances of being achieved are quite small, and if it can't be achieved, so you don't get money, at least as players we can test this casino, how fast it is, and so on, and as players we can channel our desire to play.

Quote from: Mahiyammahi on Today at 11:25:14 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 15, 2026, 10:56:06 PM

Good game Potato Chips, but free spins on one of the highest volatility games with a $10 win cap and, on top of that, a 40x wagering requirement… if this is true, then this seems like mission impossible!
As I said, if this is the case then I totally understand why BitcoinHunt3r had to reject this offer. It doesn’t seem that appealing to anyone who understand how such bonuses wok (supposed to work), to be honest.

I've deposited $12 to try this free spins. I've won over $13 but maybe they only give max $10 if we forfeit the bonus. I've forfeit the bonus cause it's impossible for me to complete a 40x wagering, still though I'm left with 8$ free winning profits. I did received the bonus on Wanted Dead Or Alive , from 100 spins didn't hit any scatter + only $13 winning. Maybe didn't have that much of luck.

Although it was a good experience with plump. Received my withdrawal instantly, it was like transferring fund from one wallet to another.

That makes sense, it will be very difficult to complete the 40x wager bonus especially with a small remaining balance, I also canceled the bonus and was credited $3, so it is indeed difficult to complete a high wager, at least what has been experienced is reaching 20x wager and it worked only once that the rest lost a lot or could not be completed, for me it is natural that casinos have high TO requirements so that they are not easy to win. Hehe

Quote from: yhiaali3 on Today at 02:28:10 AM

شكرا لكما أخي @OmegaStarScream و @khaled0111
أنا جاهز بالطبع لتقديم أي معلومات أو أي مساعدة لكنني لا أعلم ما المطلوب بالضبط ، حبذا لو وضح @tas0000 ما المطلوب بالضبط أو وضع رابط الموضوع الإنجليزي الذي ذكره الأخ أوميغا وأنا جاهز لتقديم المساعدة حسب الإمكانيات

إذا كان قصدك شراء أو بيع بيتكوين أو عملات مشفرة في سوريا عن طريق الدولار والليرة السورية أو تطبيق شام كاش فهو متاح عن طريق وسيط موثوق، طبعا هناك أكثر من وسيط لكن أنا أعطيك عنوان الوسيط الذي أتعامل معه منذ سنوات عديدة وهو موثوق جدا والحمد لله وعمولته منخفضة مع موثوقية وسرعة في التحويل.
إذا أحببت أعطيك كل التفاصيل.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5580025.msg66606372#msg66606372

هذا هو رابط الموضوع. لا أدري لما ذكر الأخر سوريا و ليبيا مع بعض (ربما يمتلك جنسية البلدين؟)

لكن أفترض أنه كما ذكر الأخ هيوج، لا يمكن الشراء عن طريق أي منصة معروفة لأن البطاقات في سوريا لا تعتمد على نظام الفيزا و الماستركارد، بل ربما هي بطاقة للدفع محليا فقط (و كان الأخ كان قد ذكر أن البطاقة من بنك محلي، يعني ليست لبنك الكتروني مثل redotpay أو غيرها)

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 15, 2026, 08:27:21 PM

Sorry albon, but as far as I can see, they are just trying to appeal their case again in order to get the ban lifted. I think you are pushing it a bit too far by saying they are trying to bypass the block (they are exercising their right by resubmitting their case for review). This is just my humble opinion for the time being.
I'll need to re-read the whole thread and check all the proof both parties have provided before making a fair judgment.

Pushing it? I don’t think so. . I’m the one who filed the complaint with real evidence that’s why MetaMask already blocked them.

the guys behind these domains tried to remove the block but MetaMask rejected it because these are obvious scam clone sites. .Now, just five days after their first request was denied they’ve submitted a new one using fake claims and arguments

MetaMask will likely spot this easily and reject the request again to protect users. I’m not pushing anything, but to clearly expose these deceptive practices,so the reports I filed can move forward.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 15, 2026, 10:56:06 PM

Good game Potato Chips, but free spins on one of the highest volatility games with a $10 win cap and, on top of that, a 40x wagering requirement… if this is true, then this seems like mission impossible!

It is not impossible, I have done it few days ago when I completed the x40 wagering requirement here in Plump.
Here in Plump, the x40 wagering requirement can be said as easier than other casinos because original games contributes 100% unlike in other casinos where original games or even table games contributes like 10-25% only towards wagering requirement.
The x40 wager requirement is applied for the bonus only while the free spins is wager free, means that you can withdraw the winning from the FS without wagering it first but I'm not sure about the winning cap.
Is it all capped to $10 or it depends on the deposited amount by players.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 15, 2026, 10:56:06 PM

Good game Potato Chips, but free spins on one of the highest volatility games with a $10 win cap and, on top of that, a 40x wagering requirement… if this is true, then this seems like mission impossible!
As I said, if this is the case then I totally understand why BitcoinHunt3r had to reject this offer. It doesn’t seem that appealing to anyone who understand how such bonuses wok (supposed to work), to be honest.

I've deposited $12 to try this free spins. I've won over $13 but maybe they only give max $10 if we forfeit the bonus. I've forfeit the bonus cause it's impossible for me to complete a 40x wagering, still though I'm left with 8$ free winning profits. I did received the bonus on Wanted Dead Or Alive , from 100 spins didn't hit any scatter + only $13 winning. Maybe didn't have that much of luck.

Although it was a good experience with plump. Received my withdrawal instantly, it was like transferring fund from one wallet to another.

شكرا لكما أخي @OmegaStarScream و @khaled0111
أنا جاهز بالطبع لتقديم أي معلومات أو أي مساعدة لكنني لا أعلم ما المطلوب بالضبط ، حبذا لو وضح @tas0000 ما المطلوب بالضبط أو وضع رابط الموضوع الإنجليزي الذي ذكره الأخ أوميغا وأنا جاهز لتقديم المساعدة حسب الإمكانيات

إذا كان قصدك شراء أو بيع بيتكوين أو عملات مشفرة في سوريا عن طريق الدولار والليرة السورية أو تطبيق شام كاش فهو متاح عن طريق وسيط موثوق، طبعا هناك أكثر من وسيط لكن أنا أعطيك عنوان الوسيط الذي أتعامل معه منذ سنوات عديدة وهو موثوق جدا والحمد لله وعمولته منخفضة مع موثوقية وسرعة في التحويل.
إذا أحببت أعطيك كل التفاصيل.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:56:06 PM

Good game Potato Chips, but free spins on one of the highest volatility games with a $10 win cap and, on top of that, a 40x wagering requirement… if this is true, then this seems like mission impossible!
As I said, if this is the case then I totally understand why BitcoinHunt3r had to reject this offer. It doesn’t seem that appealing to anyone who understand how such bonuses wok (supposed to work), to be honest.

Personally, I don't mind the game since I play a lot of pretty volatile games already + also do more volatile buys. 40x is only for the bonus depo money in which originals count 100% so it is much easier to build up wager. 40x is not easy but it is a fair shot at originals IMO. I did complete mine, but I just did not withdraw and kept playing.

The max win cap was something I forgot to look into. I did ask it here some time ago, but forgot about it yesterday. It is strange though that woodie's FS win of 20 bucks was credited fully, while I only got 10 bucks.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:56:06 PM

Good game Potato Chips, but free spins on one of the highest volatility games with a $10 win cap and, on top of that, a 40x wagering requirement… if this is true, then this seems like mission impossible!
As I said, if this is the case then I totally understand why BitcoinHunt3r had to reject this offer. It doesn’t seem that appealing to anyone who understand how such bonuses wok (supposed to work), to be honest.

Hope they change it.

I think caping with around 500-1000$ should be the one who are suitable, with 50x wagering should be no problem at all. Capped 10$ are kind very very low, the interesting could be vanish due the capped max win for the free spin are just to low.

I'm not a fans of bonuses, but agree if the max cap thats was low.

Quote from: Ochan_yazo_tochant on Today at 02:13:35 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 14, 2026, 10:51:25 PM

^^
الشركات و المؤسسات التي تقوم بتحليل البيانات الموجودة على البلوكتشاين يمكنها على الاغلب معرفة ان تم ذلك او لا. اغلب الاستنتاجات الموجودة في المقال الذي نشر رابطه الاخ اوميغا مبنية على تقارير احدى تلك الشركات وهي chainalysis.
رغم ان المقال فيه معلومات مهمة، كنت اجهل اغلبها للحقيقية، الا ان ما لفت انتباهي و وجدته غريبا بعض الشيئ هو تكرار اكثر من مرة انه لو قامت ايران باستعمال العملة الثابتة usdt1 الذي انشأته عائلة ترامب فستحقق مكاسب هامة منها امكانية ان يقوم ترامب برفع العقوبات عن ايران.
هذا يبدو غريبا بعض الشيئ و يقلل من مصداقية ما ذكر في المقال اذ يظهر كمحاولة للتوجيه اكثر منه كمقال اخباري.

لا أعتقد أن ترامب يرفع العقوبات عن إيران إذا إستخدمت في معاملاتها عملة عائلة ترامب. و لكن يمكن لإيران أن تقبل الدفع بواسطة عملات الخصوصية التي يصعب تتبعها عكس البتكوين يمكن لشركات مثل chainslysis تتبع المحافظ التابعة للحرس الثوري و يتم وضع هذه العناوين في القائمة السوداء مما يؤدي تجميدها فور تبادلها على المنصات المركزية. لهذا أعتقد أن الخيار الأفضل للحرس الثوري عملات الخصوصية مثل Zcash

إعلان حصار المونيء الإيرانية من قبل القيادة المركزية الأمريكية و من جهة أخرى الحرس الثوري يقوم بالسيطرة على المضيق و إغلاقه. من المتضرر هنا؟ هل إيران فقط؟ هذه المناوراة تهدد دول أسيا و أروبا التي تشهد نقص في مخزونها مما يأثر عليها سلباً.
في الواقع يبدو أن ترامب يحاصر حلفائه في الناتو أليس هذا هو المغزى من هذه اللعبة

نعم على الغالب أخي هذا هو مغزى ترامب من هذا الحصار هو يريد معاقبة حلفائه في الناتو الذي تخلو عنه ولم يساعدوه في الحرب كما أنه يريد عرقلة الصين التي لم تتأثر بالحصار وسفنها تروح وتأتي بحرية في المضيق بالإضافة كما ذكر الأخ أوميغا أنه يريد الحصول على بعض المال لأنه لايمكن أن يترك أي وليمة بدون أن يشارك فيها

أما بالنسبة لإمكانية أن يرفع ترامب العقوبات عن إيران إذا إستخدمت في معاملاتها عملة عائلة ترامب usdt1 فلماذا تستغرب أخي أنا أعتقد أن هذا ممكن جدا لأن ترامب يبيع أبوه من أجل المال وكل حروبه من أجل المال، من الناحية العملية هذا ممكن جدا لأنه إذا استخدمت إيران usdt1 فسيحقق ترامب هدفين مهمين الأول وهو الحصول على المال من خلال اضطرار كل الدول التي تريد عبور المضيق لهذه العملة التافهة والثاني أن هذه عملة مركزية بيد ترامب شخصيا وبإمكانه في أي وقت تجميد أي معاملة غير راضي عنها أو سحب الأرصدة يعني تحكم كامل مثل العقوبات وأسوأ.

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 14, 2026, 10:51:25 PM

^^
الشركات و المؤسسات التي تقوم بتحليل البيانات الموجودة على البلوكتشاين يمكنها على الاغلب معرفة ان تم ذلك او لا. اغلب الاستنتاجات الموجودة في المقال الذي نشر رابطه الاخ اوميغا مبنية على تقارير احدى تلك الشركات وهي chainalysis.
رغم ان المقال فيه معلومات مهمة، كنت اجهل اغلبها للحقيقية، الا ان ما لفت انتباهي و وجدته غريبا بعض الشيئ هو تكرار اكثر من مرة انه لو قامت ايران باستعمال العملة الثابتة usdt1 الذي انشأته عائلة ترامب فستحقق مكاسب هامة منها امكانية ان يقوم ترامب برفع العقوبات عن ايران.
هذا يبدو غريبا بعض الشيئ و يقلل من مصداقية ما ذكر في المقال اذ يظهر كمحاولة للتوجيه اكثر منه كمقال اخباري.

لا أعتقد أن ترامب يرفع العقوبات عن إيران إذا إستخدمت في معاملاتها عملة عائلة ترامب. و لكن يمكن لإيران أن تقبل الدفع بواسطة عملات الخصوصية التي يصعب تتبعها عكس البتكوين يمكن لشركات مثل chainslysis تتبع المحافظ التابعة للحرس الثوري و يتم وضع هذه العناوين في القائمة السوداء مما يؤدي تجميدها فور تبادلها على المنصات المركزية. لهذا أعتقد أن الخيار الأفضل للحرس الثوري عملات الخصوصية مثل Zcash