Guys, @Eternad, @stadus, @dimonstration, @khaled0111, @Woodie, thank you for the congratulations and kind words! You know, I've learned with age that quite often a personal achievement you are very excited about may look not so exciting to others. That's why I feel so happy when my excitement is shared.m Thankls again, guys. Answering your question about how many tries it took to get 633x, I’d say — a lot. I didn’t count, but I can tell you it was approximately 400 tries — maybe even more. Doing that many tries in one sitting isn’t fun, so to keep it fun and easy, I did 40–80 tries per day, and it took me several days to get that 633x. ... When I saw that the next jump would give me 2,743x, I thought, "Humans aren’t wired for that much patience. The next step is simply impossible to win!" But a couple of days passed, and I decided to try my luck with this game again. I knew it might take thousands of tries, so I thought, maybe I’ll finally get there by summer. But fate had other plans, as they say. Within the first 50-60 tries I hit it.




Now I think the next step, with a 16,460x multiplier, is really impossible. But maybe some of you will surprise me. You never know what awaits you in the next 100 tries.

Yes. I know.
They didn't get much. The system flagged his withdrawal, yet I was lazy to check carefully before releasing the first withdrawal. Then I released the 2nd withdrawal without a check. Once he requested the 3rd withdrawal, I noticed that something is wrong. However, that wasn't much to be honest.

---

That is some good suggestions! I will implement the changes tonight. About the abuser, we do not have many users as you may know. We just launched two weeks ago and the platform is still in Beta. The guy actually threatened us of giving negative review on Bitcointalk forum. This happened the next day of our announcement thread launch.

Exposing these abusers would be good, so everyone can red tag them 'til kingdom come. But, won't that only cause more problems for Blocino? That practically violates the user's privacy. They even stated on their own Privacy Policy page that they can't disclose any personal data to any third party unless required by law.
Doing so might also deter future possible gamblers from using this casino especially those who are keen on keeping their personal data private.

You don't get the point.

When @khaled0111 writes his post, I can go about it in two ways. Either I hammer him for not using the correct terminology, or I can try to understand what he is trying to convey. He may use wrong terminology, but I don't feel particularly incentivized to lecture him about something that I could interpret as being false (like you) or see the point he is making.


It is not false what he is saying. Whether he should be using "actual" vs. "theoretical" or whatever, sample size is all that matters in the context that @khaled0111 is talking about


and you won't change that.

No, I'm not losing myself in anything. The concepts of HE and RTP are very clear, and this forum is full of people who have some idea of the concepts but don't understand them. Several of them have been quoted in this thread.


Great way to talk nonsense. Shall I explain it to you like you're a primary school kid? I'll repeat it again: RTP and HE are two concepts that basically express the same thing in different ways, and talking about short-term RTP is nonsense because RTP refers to large statistical samples something that neither you nor khaled0111 nor leea-1334 are going to change, no matter how much you want to twist and turn the issue.

You are frequently losing yourself in semantics, but it is ok. At least there is some hope that you do understand the concept of sample size in statistics, not mathematics:


whereas your "short-term" here undoubtedly refers to a low number of events (aka small sample size).


lol

Nice wall of text but I don't know why you are quoting me because that has nothing to do with what I am saying. RTP and HE are two ways of expressing the same. They are mathematically interchangeable; if a game has a HE of 2%, it is because the RTP is 98%, and vice versa. So leea-1334 si simply wrong.


So, what @khaled0111 wrongly labels as "short-term RTP" would be more accurately described as short-term results, not "short-term RTP".

Sometimes we have to think around the corners in order to get to the same result we want.

Thanks for khaled for finding a solution

Good suggestion and interestingly it worked. I didn't expect it would. CTRL+F is a keyboard shortcut to the browser's in-built search feature. In case of Chrome, they call it "Find & Edit." They basically achieve the same thing, but the issue here was that Toshi.bet assigned that keyboard shortcut to their own search option. However, the browser's find feature can still be activated in a different way.

Thanks!

In any probabilistic environment, sample size does matter. In mathematics, it is about certainty and rigorous proofs. Mathematics are deterministic, law of nature.

Statistics are probabilistic and empirical and you actually often times approximate results via sample size. You have a whole different toolset to evaluate outcomes (CI, RA, mean, median, SD...)

So sample size does matter individually, but the question asked here (I guess) is whether the collective RTP is 100% (in a large sample size, which I assume is approximately given if Duel has a lot of users). If they have a ton of players, Duel should hand as much money out as they are cashing in from players over time.
 
I can't say for sure, but maybe the word "actual" that @leea-1334 used, was to imply that for an individual, the 100% RTP rate is rather irrelevant unless that individual plays enormous volumes distributed among a very large number of events (dice rolls, slot rounds etc.).


What @khaled0111 labels as "short-term RTP" is most likely referring to a small sample size because sample size clearly matters. The larger the sample size, the closer the relationship between average payout and average wager, aka 100% RTP convergence.

In a probabilistic environment, which I think a casino is (it is not mathematical), a 100% RTP essentially means a redistribution of funds among players following a stochastic process.

He is wrong. RTP and HE are two sides of the same coin. It doesn't matter the sample size.


False.


False as well. Unless you want to play on words here. If the RTP is 98%, it doesn't matter if you get 300% or -50% in the short term. RTP is a mathematical concept, and what you call short-term RTP results have nothing to do with the mathematical concept.

I have played on blocino, I think their original games are very light and easy to use. I use my phone to play, and it works fine. Pretty impressive


Well, that's probably what happened. Furthermore, the OP used a code to claim the test bonus, allowing anyone to share it and abuse it. It would be better if the test bonus for Bitcointalk members was credited directly to their accounts to prevent abuse.

1. Bitcointalk is probably the first place they announced their casino, which is still in beta phase
2. Bitcointalk is probably the only place where they provided some members with bonus codes for testing the platform
3. The abusers knowing how popular bitcointalk is decided to threaten OP that they would post a scam accusation if their accounts stayed blocked.

No prob, you were only trying to help a member.
Regarding the FS, once your registration is complete and you log in, click on your profile icon, then select "Bonuses" There, you’ll find your 20 free spins, make sure to activate them because they have an expiration date (see the image please)

اكيد أخي معظم البرامج المفتوحة المصدر تعتمد على المتطوعين وخاصة بالنسبة للترجمات لكن في النهاية هي مسؤولية فريق التطوير الأساسي الذي ينبغي عليه أن يراجع الملفات قبل إضافتها للمصدر
المتطوعون لايستطيعون رفع هذه الملفات إلى المستودع ودمجها إلا عن طريق المطور الاساسي أو في حالة إعطائهم صلاحية لإجراء تغييرات في المستودع وأستبعد هنا أن يكون تم إعطائهم الصلاحية، على الأغلب المطور قام بدمج الترجمة دون مراجعة ربما لان اللغة الفرنسية أو العربية ليست لغته الأصلية لكن كان عليه على الأقل أن يتأكد من عناوين البيتكوين الموجودة في الترجمة

صحيح هذه نقطة مهمة للغاية لانه ان كان يستعمل تطبيق تطبيق الهاتف فانه من المستحيل نسخ العنوان الا اذا قام المستخدم بنقله يدويا و هو ما استبعده تماما و لكن لا احد يعلم بالضبط. كل شيء وارد بما ان الضحية مبتدأ و ليس بالدراية الكافية للتفريق بين جميع عناصر المحفظة. هذا يزيد من التأكيد على ضرورة معرفة الطريقة الصحيحة للاستخدام الامن للمحفظة

اما على تطبيق الحاسوب، و ان لم يكن قد قام بنقله يدويا في اقصى الحالات، فان هذا يفتح فرضية ان احد المطورين قد قاموا بتحوير صيغة العنوان لجعله من الممكن نسخه. يعني المطور جعل من خانة العنوان استثناء ليتمكن الضحية من نسخه. هذا سينفي التهمة بالمطلق عن الجهة المسؤولة عن الترجمة الفرنسية و يحيل المسؤولية الى فريق التطوير نفسه اي انه عمل داخلي inside job.

A gambler can have a edge over games that are skill based but it can be very different for one to have an edge over games that are luck based. This can be a difficult thing and this is what most casinos use to make profits from gamblers.

Since we can not control luck, it is the casinos that can at least control how gamblers win on their platforms reducing the possibility of users making too much profits by reducing the odds of the games, making themselves quite fortunate.

If one is going to use a centralized exchange, they already know that they have to pass KYC in the exchange. I don't know if op has funds in his exchange account, but what this case actually proves is that people should not store their funds in custodial services and they should be their bank.

If you lose your wallet file or you device, what you'd simply do in a self custodial setup is to revover your wallet with your seed phrase. However, if it's in a custodial service, your fate rests in their hands and i don't like that.

I do not think that it is possible to predict your luck. Your are lucky or not. But you can not be lucky always and you can win for some time and one day you will lose all your money.

في الموضوع الخاص بالكشف عن مستحدمي الذكاء الاصطناعي في قسم Reputation ليس هناك سوى المنشورات الانقليزية. حسب ما فهمت فان هناك مواضيع مشابهة في الاقسام باللغات الاخرى. بما انه لا يوجد هذا الموضوع هنا قلت يمكنني دعم مجهود المشرف باستخدام report to moderator و هو سيتصرف التصرف الصحيح. انا اكتفي برفع التقرير كل ما اشتبهت باحدى المنشورات خصوصا الاعضاء الغير النشيطين دوما انا لا اشك ابدا بمنشوراتهم.

اتفهم كذلك ملاحظتك ان هناك من يريد ان يقول شيئا و لا يملك الكفاءة بالعربية. هذا طبيعي و مفهوم اذا كان بوستات لها اهمية. حتى لو تم رفع تقرير فان المشرف لن يتخذ اي اجراء. انا لن اضع تقييم على حساب اي عضو حتى لو ثبت انه يستعمل AI. اعتقد ان هذا ليس دوري ان اشوه سمعة احد لانه ربما يتغير في المستقبل.

No KYC is NO KYC 


Thanks for pointing that out. Actually, we started with ETH only and later added other cryptocurrencies. We overlooked that part. However, we already updated it.

It is correct, actually. We do accept XRP deposits on the BSC chain.


Please PM us your username.
It's No KYC casino.


Correct. The slots are in Demo Mode and cannot be played with real money. We will mention it on the website.
About BLC token, it is staked automatically on the dividend pool and the players get dividend every 24 hours based on their BLC holdings. The TestCoin is for our Staffs only to test the games since we are still in Beta. We created TestCoin so the staffs can play the games to test them, and these testcoin wager won't count towards the wagering contests. We did it to make the wager contest fair for the players.

---

It seems we got some exploiters from BitcoinTalk forum, who managed to exploit some bugs and used it in a few games. They successfully withdrawn some money already, and after blocking their account, they are threatening us to give negative review on the forum. We expect them to come here and write more details about it.

---

Speaking of exploits, we will open a bug bounty program soon and we will reward if anyone can report security issues of the games. Feel free to reach us via private message if you are interested.

Pretty much. We can only play with demo credits and not real money.

Personally, I don't think it's a good idea to display the slots when they are in such state—demo mode only. Because some folks may thought it's working as usual and depo, only to find out they can't play the slots at all with real money. It can be a real hassle. We all know casinos typically have wager req for real money as well and/or sensitive when players depo and withdraw with little to no play.

If the team wants to do some tests, they can keep it in the staging environment, and on the live public website, they can simply add coming soon in the slots.

That is something I have noticed from scammers who manage to get their way and steal money or when they believe they are about to get a lot of money from a single victim, they actually get cocky and show some sadistic and psychopathic characteristics against their victims.
It is because they feel entitled to the money of others, as it was their own money.

At this point, I believe it would be very safe to assume those scammers behind this theft are just trying to mock us all and perhaps they could be even trying to turn this situation in their favor in order to continue stealing money with their next fake casino.

This experience has made me skeptic of any new casi o which appears here and claims to be free of Know your client.

   261. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   262. 396526: ezeminer (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   263. 397737: hilariousetc (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   264. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   265. 401014: Ultegra134 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1013 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   266. 402366: Betwrong (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   267. 402550: digicoinuser (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (84 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   268. 405709: ds06 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   269. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   270. 407892: micromen (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   271. 409704: Acura3600 (Trust:  neutral) (285 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   272. 410541: MaoChao (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   273. 416731: leowonderful (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   274. 430390: psycodad (Trust:  neutral) (2311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   275. 452769: bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   276. 454323: Raimonn (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   277. 465017: actmyname (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   278. 479624: Last of the V8s (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (3902 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   279. 487377: Kalemder (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   280. 504780: tothemoonsands (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   281. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   282. 507936: DarkStar_ (Trust: +64 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   283. 516434: Trevoid (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (474 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   284. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +33 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   285. 529564: hymperion (Trust:  neutral) (543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   286. 532686: nimogsm (Trust:  neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   287. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (6129 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   288. 535215: ralle14 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1020 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   289. 538922: TwitchySeal (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   290. 543626: jackg (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   291. 543831: zoose (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   292. 545598: Isildur (official) (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (87 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   293. 547435: LTU_btc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1017 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   294. 551460: swogerino (Trust:  neutral) (260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   295. 551559: SPQRCoin (Trust:  neutral) (132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   296. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +5 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   297. 554812: DeathAngel (Trust:  neutral) (692 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   298. 557000: minibit (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   299. 559842: kryptqnick (Trust:  neutral) (411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   300. 569362: x3t9fi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   301. 569455: BobLawblaw (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (5024 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   302. 579628: bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (2261 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   303. 580327: eddie13 (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   304. 639573: onemd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   305. 662129: Chris! (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   306. 662400: kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   307. 679341: TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   308. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (2056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   309. 728512: Xavier59 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   310. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   311. 751988: Taskford (Trust:  neutral) (516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   312. 755235: arwin100 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   313. 765632: bL4nkcode (Trust: #  +14 / =2 / -3) (808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   314. 779106: Barcode_ (Trust:  neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   315. 783422: Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   316. 787736: marlboroza (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (1778 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   317. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +5 / =6 / -0) (784 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   318. 810879: dimonstration (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   319. 815246: Murat (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   320. 817682: Gunthar (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   321. 820393: Hardstyles (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   322. 830898: adamvp (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   323. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   324. 831523: taufik123 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1955 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   325. 832366: sportsbet.io (Trust: +80 / =1 / -0) (2765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   326. 843320: Komosa (Trust:  neutral) (81 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   327. 849090: tomahawk9 (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   328. 853829: Adbitco (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   329. 861475: lebnor (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   330. 867786: HCP (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   331. 877396: AdolfinWolf (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   332. 879277: Coding Enthusiast (Trust:  neutral) (2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   333. 881377: Hhampuz (Trust: +133 / =4 / -0) (6569 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   334. 882509: Blockchayne (Trust:  neutral) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   335. 884714: CascadiaCC (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   336. 885934: SamReomo (Trust:  neutral) (565 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   337. 886369: michellee (Trust:  neutral) (405 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   338. 886521: mk4 (Trust:  neutral) (3646 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   339. 895302: icon73 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   340. 897509: xtraelv (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   341. 898713: paramind22 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (52 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   342. 898928: Theb (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   343. 900408: spirits (Trust:  neutral) (963 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   344. 903175: Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (1262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   345. 904524: ChiBitCTy (Trust: +36 / =1 / -0) (3565 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   346. 910236: Woodie (Trust:  neutral) (856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   347. 911663: sompitonov (Trust:  neutral) (1207 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   348. 917552: slaman29 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   349. 919511: nelson4lov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   350. 921974: webtricks (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   351. 926962: xLays (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (421 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   352. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3385 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   353. 932936: IdiotCoder (Trust:  neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   354. 937020: duesoldi (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   355. 938833: Chikito (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2016 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   356. 940323: Mpamaegbu (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   357. 941129: goodpunt (Trust:  neutral) (78 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   358. 942911: entebah (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (77 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   359. 943435: xxjumperxx (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   360. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +14 / =6 / -0) (1141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   361. 961598: ryzaadit (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   362. 961708: dittoup (Trust:  neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   363. 962534: Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   364. 963640: bct_ail (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1997 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   365. 965440: aoluain (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1379 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   366. 969088: leea-1334 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (722 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   367. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (1355 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   368. 988740: frodocooper (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   369. 991374: Porfirii (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (3217 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   370. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   371. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3225 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   372. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   373. 1015954: aundroid (Trust:  neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   374. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   375. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (1832 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   376. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   377. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   378. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   379. 1029297: desertboy10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

If I'm not mistaken, that's because Google play mandates that anyone accepting payments for digital content or subscriptions must use Google Play Billing. If they don't do that, they won't be able to get listed on the app store.

@sunsilk You should be able to get access to the premium version for free, if you download it through F-droid.

I play games because I want to explore games that are new with me or when I want to have entertainment. I don't play games because of any theory or fallacy of big winning chance, it's untrue. At all casinos, they run business for profit, and gamblers have to be aware of this fact, so there is no easy chance of winning especially winning big and more importantly winning against the casino in long term.

I don't take risk to test any theory or fallacy as I value safety of my fund than chance of beating a casino, or using any playing theory well for profit.

There is nothing wrong to test a new game, test a new theory, but let's do it with money people afford to lose, and surely with very tiny part of their gambling fund and never let it affects their whole gambling fund as well as general finance.

I think it's mental problems or drugs. There are physical sadists who enjoy ripping the legs off flies or generally causing pain to others, and there are psychological sadists who do things like this and then enjoy watching their work with satisfaction.

What I mean is I can't see the paid details. 

And thanks because I haven't downloaded it yet so, it shows after downloading and installing it. There's so much savings if it's annually paid, hmmm.

Haha, they should start accepting payments in crypto since they're a multi crypto wallet.

Again, thanks khaled for those details.

Obtaining a valid license means that the license issuers knows everything about the casino and the team behind, and that every detail is clear including procedures to take in case of proved scam. Otherwise, the license issuer is also considered as contributor in scam.

Just today I discovered the updates with betmoco. The case reminds me about a similar case happened since few months called betmanor. I guess many of you guys remember this casino and how he had started promotion with a huge welcome bonus with a very small wager requirement, which was the main reason why few people join the casino and made deposits. Later the representative tried to give promises that he will fix all disputes as a try to clean hos trust page but never solved a single case.

انا لا انزه المستخدم بأي حال من الأحوال خصوصا انني وجدت صعوبة في استيعاب كيف وصل الى ذلك العنوان الذي كان مختبئه في التفضيلات و بالذات النسخة الفرنسية. هذا مذهل بصراحة. لكن تأويلات الحادث وخيمة ان يكون هناك اهمال بما يسمح بادخال بيانات لا تتمكن برمجات الحماية من رصدها حتى لو كانت بدون فاعلية. صاحب ذلك العنوان كائنا من يكون قد نجح فعلا في كسب بعض الاموال ليست على ملكه و تسبب هذا بتراجع ثقتنا كمستخدمين في التطبيق و في خدماته و حتى في فريق العمل خلفه.


ما اقصده هو انه لاستعمال الكتروم للتخزين البارد فانت لست بحاجة اصلا للاتصال بالانترنت. لكن اخذت بعين الاعتبار وقت تقرير انفاق تلك المدخرات كليا او جزئيا فانه افضل ان يكون باستخدام سيرفير خاص حفاظا على الخصوصية و توفيرا لشروط حماية اكثر امانا.

بعد الحادثة الاخيرة مع محفظة الكتروم النسخة الفرنسية، اصبحت اشك في كل ما كنت اعتقد انه على كفاءة و جودة خدمات عالية. و بالرغم من عدم رصد اي حادثة خطيرة لدى مستعملي الكتروم فانه يوصى بتوخي الحذر الشديد خصوصا اذا كنت تستعمل الكتروم للتخزين البارد بمساعدة سيرفير خاص. اذا كان يتعذر على اي شخص الخوض في تفاصيل تقنية او ملاحظات الاخلالات المحتملة فانه من الافضل التواصل بالسؤال و النقاش مع مختصين قادرين على تقديم الافادة.

هذه بعض الروابط المفيدة لمستخدمي الكتروم: