Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Pmalek? Jel došlo vrijeme da te vidimo u nekom promu? Za wc dodat ćemo 2 nova promoa, oba sponzorina od strane Rainbeta. Svaki 100mBTC.

Uopšte ne pratim nogometne lige, čak ni lige petice više. Pogledam utakmice svog kluba, Juventusa i završnicu Lige Prvaka ako su zanimljivi dueli i to je to. Ali Svjetsko Prvenstvo nije svaki dan i ako bude zanimljiv promo možda se i priključim. Budem vidio kako će to sve izgledati a i gdje ću ja bit u to vrijeme pa da se znam organizovati. Hvala na pozivu!

Super, što nas je više to bolje, a ako se još netko zainteresira možda uspijemo sastaviti i 3 lokalna tima sa našeg područja Grin

Sad kad je slackovic spomenuo malo sam pogledao tu sekciju i vidim da ima i drugih dostupnih sportskih natjecanja ali meni je za sada sasvim dovoljno i BSFL natjecanje i još to ekipno natjecanje koje kreće za svjetsko prvenstvo i više od toga bi mi stvarno bilo previše, moglo bi se pretvoriti u full tim job i opterećenje a to ne želim.
Super da osim signature kampanja ima toliko dodatnih mogućnosti drugih kampanja tj. natjecanja gdje se čovjek može malo i zabaviti, skupiti jednostavno dovoljan broj postova u gambling sekciji i još dodatno zaraditi. Win Win.
Ehh kad bi mi bar moj trenutni manager priznavao postove u BSFL threadu Cheesy

Aktivirajte se ljudi već smo u punom zamahu. Očekujem bar još jednu cro ekipu i jednu možda balkan

Jedan igrač s iskostvom BSFLa unutar tima i jedan koji je ikada odigrao ticket su vam po meni već dovoljni za dobre šanse i minimalni effort oko pravila i svega.
⚽⭐⚽ Rainbet’s BTT World Cup 2026 – Road to Glory ⚽⭐⚽

Kao što su ti neki već rekli, čudno mi je da ti ne broji postove u BSFL threadu i ja bi to raspravio direkt s managerom. Ideja iza pravila je da ti veliki threadovi nemaju smisla jer je pitanje postavljeno u prvom postu već odgovoreno sigurno na prvih 10 stranica. Bar je to meni tako bilo tako prezentirano, to za BSFL ne vrijedi jer nije takav tip threada i svaki tjedan je zapravo nova diskusija.

S druge strane meni je bilo kakvo ograničavanje postova kontraproduktivno. Biraj ljude u kampanju koji pišu tamo di ti treba, ali to vrijedi samo za top accounte dok multiacounteri vjerojatno mjenjaju sklonosti kako vjetar puše. Mi u našim kampanjama uglavnom odbijamo samo games & rounds, jer baš plaćati nekome da piše 21 gol ili 68.645$ je stvarno debilno

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:41:43 PM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:29:07 PM

Sigurno menadžeri tu nemaju zadnju riječ. Oni mogu savjetovati vlasnike usluga koje reklamiraju šta je najbolje i predložiti saradnju na duže staze jer to ima bolje rezultate od kratkotrajnih kampanja. I menadžerima se to više isplati jer pretpostavljam da i njih plaćaju na tjednoj bazi. Ali na kraju krajeva odlučuju oni koju daju novac za promociju. Očekivati instant rezultate, pogotovo nakon tjedan ili dva, je pogrešno a ima i takvih. Viđali smo kampanje koje se završe nakon 7 dana vjerovatno jer neko nije vidio rezultate koje odmah očekuje i ne želi dalje da plaća za reklamu.

Zapravo downsizing na pola recimo nakon 2 mjeseca možda čak i drži vodu. U dva mjeseca jako dobro upoznaš ljude i kako pišu, te ako izbaciš pola ostane ti creame de la creame Grin

To naravno vrijedi kada uzimaš ljude koje ne znaš od prije. Ako ne radiš to možda se isplati svaka dva mjeseca izbaciti bottom 25% i uzeti nove ljude te tako kontinuirano dizati kvalitetu kampanje.

Quote from: inspace on April 23, 2026, 07:22:28 PM

Quote from: ➥ Instant / Automatic & No Registration [Official Website] & [Fast Tutorial] & [ANN Thread] & [Altcointalk] 🔊

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/05/22/UaYjBv.gif

CCE.Cash is a Fast Automatic Exchange accepting .Bitcoin, ETH, SOL, XMR, TRX, USDT., etc. Users can quickly and anonymously complete currency exchange without registering. Its core features are: automation, simplicity, and security. A simple 2-step guide will help you quickly get familiar with the functionality.

Rules/Prizes:

➥ Pick a SLOT! 🎯
➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ You can choose 2 SLOTS if you posted comments in the ANN topic before the raffle announcement draw in the last 2 weeks.
➥ After selecting a block, we will use the BitList tool to determine the winner.

01 - knuckey
02 - Tmoonz
03 - mikel_012
04 - Barcode_
05 - Cityhunter34
06 - CoinMin3r
07 - FP91G
08 - NeuroticFish
09 - Real-Duke
10 - Danydee
11 - TryNinja
12 - Z-tight
13 - Z-tight
14 - ovcijisir
15 -
16 - Mr. Magkaisa
17 - tvplus006
18 - Woodie
19 -
20 - safar1980
21 - Pandorak
22 - haloxon
23 - GazetaBitcoin
24 - malcovi2
25 - Unsoldier
26 - Rikafip
27 - Soonandwaite
28 -
29 -
30 - hugeblack
31 - odunybiz
32 - DYING_S0UL
33 - Italian Panic
34 - klarki
35 - examplens
36 - bitmover
37 - bitmover
38 -
39 -
40 - masulum
41 - Pmalek
42 -
43 - FinneysTrueVision
44 - examplens
45 - dansus021
46 -
47 - viljy
48 - Taricoins
49 -
50 - sabotag3x
51 -
52 - mikel_012
53 - UserU
54 - mv1986
55 - inspace
56 -
57 - Hypnotizer
58 - zasad@
59 - Bigjoe33
60 - xandry

Application:

Code:

Slot #: 60
BTC Address: bc1qw9et92hp8k4vewk3w7ak0mqctqnke5c29u2pg6

Quote from: CCE.Cash

We reserve the right to ignore any application without explanation. No random slots.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

- They say that battery failures happen from time to time. OK. No arguments there.

In addition to LoyceV's comment, it's worth mentioning that most of them can still be used while being plugged in.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

- The native apps of these devices introduce various types of attack vectors. They introduce some and then they get fixed. The same can be said about software wallets. It's always a fight between good and evil.

+ Considering that most of them are compatible with other wallets, they can always opt for one of the so-called safer ones.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

- Hardware wallets aren't private and the vendors know your name and can see your balances. True, but it also depends how you buy them and where. Some companies sell their devices in physical stores, like Best Buy and MediaMarkt. Parts for DIY HWs can be purchased from various unrelated sellers online.

+ Some of them also give their users the option to use their own nodes.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

In the end, Unstoppable and other software wallets aren't better and safer than good hardware wallets.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 02:24:04 PM

But the fact that they seem to think they must talk down hardware wallets to get people to use their app makes me trust them less.

Exactly and that's why I finally pulled the plug on them... I thought their app was unstoppable, but it turns out it wasn't that hard to stop them ^{[I just did]}: Select their app, then hit uninstall Cool

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Trofo
mv1986
cryptofrka
Slissy
hilariousandco
Porfirii
mitchr4
un_rank
Jayce
Ryu_Ar1
ILuckyGuyI
goodpunt
Mahdirakib
Dump3er
Charles-Tim
avp2306
Zwei
NeuroticFish
slaman29
LFC_Bitcoin
knuckey
igebotz
B1g4udge
koal-84
tiCeR
KTChampions
BABY SHOES
xandry
Strongkored
dzonikg28
Woodie
Pmalek
mole0815
CLS63
famososMuertos
eisen33
buwaytress
arallmuus
ovcijisir
leea-1334
Betwrong
hosemary
Renato297
entebah
VashaUdacha777
klarki
crwth
jeremypwr
Jinetics1111
holydarkness
Rikafip
Harkorede

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 09:38:46 AM

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 07:52:19 AM

Hvala Pmalek na ovom update-u novih kampanja u ponudi.
Odlučio sam probati svoju sreću sa DEX.fo signature kampanjom jer mi uvjeti odgovaraju.
Nema minimalnog broja postova, kampanja plaća više postova i bolje po postu nego moja trenutna, prihvaća i lokalne postove a čak nema ni obveze pisanja u gambling sekciji.
Predao sam prijavu ali vidim da su se prijave ''rastegle'' već do 6. stranice pa nisam baš optimist Grin

Nedavno se zatvorila jedno dobro plaćena kampanja i očito se povećala potražnja za novim kampanjama.

Da, ja sam isto na vagi bi li se prijavio na tu kampanju ili ne. Uvjeti su odlični, ponajviše jer nam za dva-tri mjeseca stižu godišnji odmori, a kampanja nema minimalnog broja postova. Samo opet je problem toga što nisam siguran hoće li kampanja potrajati ili se zatvoriti nakon tri-četiri tjedna.

Vec smo diskutovali o ovakvom nastupu menadzera, gde otvori kampanju za veliki broj ucesnika, da bi to vec nakon par ciklusa redukovao taj broj i nakon mesec dana je sveo na nekoliko ucesnika. Nisam siguran koja je osnovna ideja za to, kad je prilicno jasno da signature kampanja radi posao samo na duzi period. Umesto da imas kampanju za 50 ucesnika jedan mesec, bolje je 15 kvalitetnih, ali 3 meseca.

Dobar je trend sto ove instant menjacnice krecu sa kampanjama, mada u tom biznisu je znatno manja zarada nego kod kazina, pa je uvek tesko ocekivati da ce vecina njih biti dugorocna.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

It's not a secret that people tend to overdo it when advertising and talking about their products and services on social media. Unstoppable Wallet did just that yesterday, trying to make it seem that it's better to use a hot wallet, like Unstoppable, instead of a hardware wallet.

I've seen that post (or at least something similar) before. Most of it is partially true, but the information is incomplete and one-sided. The full story would be that both hardware and (hot) mobile software wallets have use cases, and for the most part those use cases don't overlap. But the fact that they seem to think they most talk down hardware wallets makes me trust them less.

Quote

- They say that battery failures happen from time to time. OK. No arguments there.

Here's one: get one without a battery Wink

Quote

In the end, Unstoppable and other software wallets aren't better and safer than good hardware wallets.

Do they really expect people to carry around their life savings on their phone?

Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 09:10:31 AM

Week#30 payment has been processed- 8df9bc7a1e2e636fe4cd209a94d12f1d10fe4da16f6ec99405068f4eb29accc7
Sorry for the delay.

A request to everyone in my campaign and other forum users-

I know a guy who has been suffering from Hemophilia for a while now. He has spent all of his assets surviving this. Now, he is solely living on donations as he has left nothing else. His mom also got cancer. No one was left for him to help in this situation, his wife left him after he was diagnosed with this sickness.
I request everyone to help him, donate some funds to him. Whatever amount it is, it would be a great benefit for him.

BTC Addy- bc1qyw2lt33eh9tpfcr4s0gjqyx3u7mpn96uvwyj8p
USDT (BEP20, ERC20, and other EVM compatible)- 0x3e3bbb03b09a6b10f21cb40c27fee15ac657f6ef

I'll convert all these into BDT and send them through mobile banking(bkash/nagad). I'll share an update once I send them. Thanks, everyone.

Code:

Bitinity
Mahdirakib
Pmalek
hopenotlate
Fortify
boltz
aylabadia05
snipie
julerz12
GreatArkansas
satscraper
TopTort777
Die_empty
Kelvinid
Cryptomultiplier
Strongkored
Razmirraz

Hi Littlemouse, you can take half my earnings next week and contribute it towards your good cause.

Quote from: CoffeeSipper64 on April 25, 2026, 12:11:24 PM

Welcome to the forum.

Searching on your site in the Web I found both good and bad reviews regarding the site by users.

On TrustPilot your profile has been flagged for fake reviews sponsored by the site itself as self-promotion

Eventually people will test your casino out and the experiences will become more apparent.

Hello,

Thank you for your interest.

The issue we are currently facing is related to Trustpilot’s strict policies regarding how businesses invite users to leave reviews. Trustpilot requires that all review invitations are sent directly through their platform to ensure compliance with their guidelines.

We had been in discussions with them and had already started the integration process. However, during this period, we independently sent an email to our users inviting them to rate their experience with the casino. Unfortunately, this approach did not align with their policies, and as a result, a warning notice was placed on our profile.

Since then, we have been working to address the situation and ensure full compliance with their requirements moving forward.

Please let us know if you need any additional details.

--------------------------

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 09:55:27 AM

Quote from: Shishir99 on April 25, 2026, 01:13:53 PM

Welcome to the BitcoinTalk forum CasinOK.

I have some questions about the contradictions between your ANN banner and your website terms and conditions.
On the website, you do have a dedicated page for the KYC-related information, which others can find here - https://casinok.com/legal/kyc-policy

On that page, it is clearly mentioned:

Know Your Customer (KYC)

We verify the identity of every player to protect against identity theft, underage gambling, and fraudulent activities. All users must complete the KYC process before they are allowed to deposit, withdraw, or play with real money.

Good catch.

I made a test. I created an account without my phone number, didn't even verify my e-mail, and tried to make a deposit:

I was able to generate a bitcoin address to deposit:

So it is clearly possible to make a deposit without any KYC.

ToS are wrong. They are outdated, or just copied from somewhere else. They need to reflect the real casino terms of use and procedures.

We are a Hybrid brand , as you can see there are fiat payment options too, that's why there is a verification requirement, but i can assure you it's fully no KYC on crypto as mentioned. This rule about verification is only for visa/Mastercard users .

-------------------------

Quote from: avp2306 on Today at 09:51:54 AM

Quote from: OcTradism on Today at 08:57:06 AM

Quote from: Cointxz on Today at 06:25:15 AM

The OP last active was 2 days ago while they recently announced the signature campaign yesterday that probably in negotiations few days ago before the account was inactive.

I’m sure they will become active more on the following days considering that they are already putting some money on their marketing just to attract attention here

The campaign is managed by the signature campaign manager which is an outsource while the announcement thread is managed by the internal member, even by the founder. They are different people and have different active time in the forum but by running a signature campaign, and creating this announcement thread, the Casinok representative will be active in this thread and reply to community questions including user questions.

Now that they open their sig campaign they comeback in this thread and became active for answering the questions of people, since somehow those interested parties provably looking forward to see if there representative is active here.

Its not obligation for the campaign manager to answer inquiry, since we know his main duty is to monitor what's going on with his campaign. But maybe they are sorting out and later we see them trying to come up with question also other things need to answer in this thread.

We’re here and actively working on everything. There’s a lot more coming in terms of campaigns and updates, and we’ll keep things moving on our side.

All threads will be answered and handled accordingly.

-------------------------

Quote from: rohang on April 26, 2026, 08:32:38 PM

Quote from: Rruchi man on April 26, 2026, 07:58:15 PM

Quote from: rohang on April 26, 2026, 06:25:41 PM

So many posts here so i was expecting a very nice ANN with active OP having some nice announcements and Maybe promos

But they havent even made a single comment after the ANN to answer any legitimate queries or concerns

Honestly a red sign for me, if they arent even putting an effort to market would they ever help if some user needs help?

Be slow to judge, or should I say condemn? Their Ann thread was just set up a few days ago; It is possible that they are still getting someone to handle that role properly, or the person for the role is just coming up to speed.

@Casinok, considering that you are a very new casino in the gambling industry, you need to be really active to help mold your company's reputation. You need to be available to answer questions and address complaints.

It is a good thing to want to run a project in this forum; that can help with your reputation if all things go properly.

You are right maybe i am being hasty and infact scammers tend to be more proactive so i wasnt inferring that they might be dishonest

But rather that they might not be paying some attention to this forum that most other sites do

We are here from now on and everything will be alright , just got everything up and now we will work with you guys to make CasinOK better place for users

-----------------------------------

Quote from: CoffeeSipper64 on April 26, 2026, 07:36:04 PM

There have been 40 replies posted here regarding issues and questions about the site and not a SINGLE ONE of them has been posted by the OP.

I guess that is indicative of how unserious they are promoting and getting clients on a site that the terms themselves are quite hostile to newcomers.
Anyways I won't be giving them a chance to prove me wrong since I don't feel like getting scammed once again testing newly promoted sites from this forum.

We understand your concern. We’ve only recently set everything up on the forum, so it took us a bit of time to get fully organized here.

That said, we’re now actively monitoring and from this point on all questions and threads will be answered.

----------------------------------

Quote from: Bitinity on April 26, 2026, 07:36:26 AM

Quote from: Mahdirakib on April 26, 2026, 06:40:35 AM

I reached the support team to know the reason and learnt that Casinok doesn't consider the wager of mini games for the 1× deposit rollover requirement. Finally, I played some slots games and made a withdrawal request after completing the 1× rollover requirement. The withdrawal was processed within 5 minutes.

Do they have this term written anywhere on their site? This is a strange requirement if you ask me and it should not be like this because it is like forcing players to play slot games in order to withdraw. How if players only want to play the mini games such as dice, plinko, etc? Casinok should change this term and accept wager on their mini games for the 1x deposit wager requirement. Imagine if we play and wager like 10x-20x on mini games only and making profit but we cant withdraw it because we should play slot first, not a fair term imo.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 26, 2026, 07:15:34 AM

Quote from: Mahdirakib on April 26, 2026, 06:40:35 AM

Today I made a small deposit here to check my luck again. I made a withdrawal request after making a small profit on Dice game. My withdrawal was pending for 1 hour before it was rejected. I reached the support team to know the reason and learnt that Casinok doesn't consider the wager of mini games for the 1× deposit rollover requirement. Finally, I played some slots games and made a withdrawal request after completing the 1× rollover requirement. The withdrawal was processed within 5 minutes.

That's a big no-go if you ask me. Unless you claimed a bonus, which you didn't say you did, you should be allowed to wager your real money deposits any way you want. Whether that's playing dice, slots, sports, live games, or anything else is your decision. A casino shouldn't limit its players regarding the games they are allowed to wager real money on.

I saw a similar or even worse example a couple of months ago, where one casino only accepts wagers on slots for its wagering requirements with real money deposits. It's clear why it's like that. They want as many players as possible to lose their money because slot games have the highest house edge.

We understand your point, and just to clarify — this rule is not there to limit regular players, but to prevent fraudulent activity.

We’ve seen cases where certain games (like dice or similar low-risk/high-frequency games) are used to bypass requirements or gain unfair advantage. Because of that, some restrictions are applied specifically to protect the system and keep things fair for everyone.

That said, we’re always reviewing these rules and trying to keep the balance between security and a good player experience.

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 07:52:19 AM

Nedavno se zatvorila jedno dobro plaćena kampanja i očito se povećala potražnja za novim kampanjama.

Code:

Bitinity
Mahdirakib
Pmalek
hopenotlate
Fortify
boltz
aylabadia05
snipie
julerz12
GreatArkansas
satscraper
TopTort777
Die_empty
Kelvinid
Cryptomultiplier
Strongkored
Razmirraz

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:06:30 AM

Milan vs Juventus is always a match that is looked forward to with great anticipation, but it's also one that often disappoints in the end. Last night was one of those occasions. Both teams were very cautious and made defending the 0:0 result priority #1. It looked like if someone offered them the 0:0 result before kick off, both teams would accept happily. Juventus was slightly better overall, but Milan had the best scoring opportunity when Saelemaekers hit the bar.

The only goal scored came from Thuram but it was ruled offside. I thought that should stand or maybe I didn't properly analyse it.

But then, it is thank you to the new manager of Juventus. If they happen to make it to the Champions League competition, I believe they'll be so invested in the repair and rebuilding of their sqaud. Juventus I'd say was the better side, they where more of the better side mostly from the first 45 which I happen to watch.

Nedavno se zatvorila jedno dobro plaćena kampanja i očito se povećala potražnja za novim kampanjama.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 25, 2026, 07:03:34 AM

Quote from: promise444c5 on April 24, 2026, 06:37:07 PM

Nice catch! Apple already deleted the new fake Sparrow app that I mentioned yesterday, so that's good. It had a similar name to the app I wrote about last year. Both scammers, or perhaps it's the same person, were focused on multisig. The old one was named Sparrow Multi-Sig while the new one used brackets and was called Sparrow{Mobile}: Wallet M-Sig. Anyways, they are things of the past now.

You did a Good job with the reports that took it down.. I tried checking before my post but it wasn’t accessible which means they already taken if I didn’t made any typo and it shows that they are active on reports.

It’s likely same app controlled by same person as you’ve mentioned, just a change of name was likely the difference..

I’m still wondering if Apple don’t keep record of why they delete apps, this apps shouldn’t be getting through fr.
Although Cygan screenshot doesn’t have the `Multi-sig’, but they all have name `Sparrow’ and it’s categorized as Wallet.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 25, 2026, 03:26:59 PM

Most online casinos on this forum that advertise themselves as not having KYC simply mean that they don't require KYC from the get go or by default but they reserve the right to request from players to undergo identity verification at any point in time. However, the thing you found is significantly different and isn't the same thing as 'we don't request KYC by default'. Those terms state that you can't even play, deposit or withdraw without undergoing KYC first. Very contradicting indeed!

Correct. As you noticed already, they are totally opposite. I understand what some casinos mean by claiming themself as No KYC. Some of them come up with the NO KYC title, and then they either modify it, or tell the community that you can play without KYC till this or that. Or sometimes, we do not require KYC for crypto players, we do it for fiat players, etc., etc. As for this casino, they clearly stated that they are very strict about KYC. The player cannot even move without doing the KYC.

I don't understand why the hell they would claim themself as no KYC casino in Bitcointalk announcement thread. Is it became a marketing strategy? So they get more comments in their thread? Claiming themself as No KYC so people talk about it?

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:15:34 AM

Yeah, I didn't take any bonuses. And in normal situations, there shouldn't be any restrictions for the deposit rollover requirement while I haven't taken any bonuses. The in-house games are also generating revenue for them. They don't even consider the wager of those games for the weekly leaderboard contest.

Quote from: Bitinity on Today at 07:36:26 AM

They only have this terms.

Quote

8.5 Excepted Games
If some promotions require wagering, these games are excluded from all campaigns.Note: If a customer plays these games, they will not earn any points, and the games will also be excluded from Leaderboards.

Scratch Dice, Roulette, Baccarat, Dragon Tiger, Top Card, Sic Bo, Craps, Deal Or No Deal, Fan Tan, Alien Hunter, Fishing War, Lightning Dice, HyperXplorer, Plinko, Blackjack, Book of 99, Dice Clash,Arcade Bomb, Golden Roulette, All Roulette Games, Caribbean Beach Poker, Arcade Bomb, Golden Joker Dice, Classic Joker 5 Reels, Classic Joker 6 Reels, Classic Joker 6000, All Craps Games, All Plinko Games, Limbo,Limblo XY, Speed Crash, All Mini Games Type ( Dice, Hilo,Plinko, Roulette, Limbo, Frog)

'memehunter' has highlighted a terms of 1.3× odds. I think it is related to sports betting. There is no way to check the total wagered amount if you play those mini games. Those games don't even contribute to the VIP rank progress. So, I don't see any reasons for keeping those mini games.

WINNERS Cool

Code:

Forum username Earnbet ID Prediction Reward

Lovelygoldinall Lovelygoldinall $77,499.99 $25
inearth inearth $77,601.00 $25
Pmalek Pmalek $77,601.55 $25
Pandorak Pandorak $77,629.99 $25

WINNERS Cool

Code:

Forum username Winna ID Prediction Reward

Dr.Osh drosh $77,477.08 $25
Pmalek Pmalek $77,658.34 $25
tvplus006 tvplus006 $77,432.23 $25
Hello5 hellok $77,412.53 $25

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (57) 14384 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (14) 9689 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2624 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4980 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10741 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4602 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9586 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 8645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +46 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1973 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6543 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6677 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3607 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 9803 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 716 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 4300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3663 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 20616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3048 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9590 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1367 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1734 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1488 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3710 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3458 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6662 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4163 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2243 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 15353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2221 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +84 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 12222 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1387 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2045 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9640 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3432 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 7385 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1417 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4019 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2649 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5596 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 5647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1890 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3971 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5530 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 7899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1866 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 9678 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6316 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1242 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 7006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8537 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (19 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (449 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Round 16 is now over, here are the results :

Closing price on 25/04/2026 : 77 619$

Name	Prediction	B/M	Final prediction	Difference
ESG	76 930,84	0% malus	76 930,84	688,16
cryptofrka	76 750,00		76 750,00	869,00
Pmalek	76 407,00		76 407,00	1 212,00
examplens	78 260,00	1% malus	79 042,60	1 423,60
Leahized	75 120,00		75 120,00	2 499,00
Hypnotizer	75 098,45	0,25% malus	74 910,70	2 708,30
LoyceV	82 194,65		82 194,65	4 575,65

ESG, this round is definitely yours. Your rules, your win, your 50BTC.
But I’m going to add a little house rule (the situation forces me to, nothing personnal). ESG, with those 104 BTC, are you buying a second life now ?
If so, you will be eligible to be chosen for the duel (round 16.5).
If not, I won’t allow you to spend those 104BTC until after the end of round 17. You will always have your 104BTC. I promise.

Ho no LoyceV, you are the last one. What a loser. But your protection is effective, so you don't lose anything.

Hypnotizer, you didn't have enough BTC to cancel your malus. But you should also have given yourself a bonus to keep from losing your last life.
Your participation in this game is hanging by a thread. You have one last chance with the duel card.
We will wait for ESG's decision to see who you can challenge to a duel.
For now, you can challenge :

Name	Life(s)	BTC	Comment
Leahized	♥♥	97	Hunter's card
LoyceV	♥♥♥	25

and maybe ESG.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:26:59 PM

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:13:53 PM

Is this just for popularity? because some casinos do not apply KYC in the thread title but in the ToS/AML they say to ask for KYC at any time this is often only for the needs of license regulation in the proof that casinos do not ask for KYC as long as there are no suspected cases.
Casinok needs clarification whether KYC in this casino is mandatory or not? Or this rule can only be relaxed?

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:18:00 PM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on Today at 09:06:35 AM

I do understand your point, but keeping coins in hot wallets is something I try to avoid as much as possible.

I am with you there, and I am not a fan of it myself. The majority of my coins aren't in hot wallets. However, sometimes it's necessary to move them to less secure but temporary locations. For me, those are mobile phone (hot) wallets. It happens in times when I spend crypto or sell it face-to-face to other people. I don't feel comfortable taking a hardware wallet and laptop with me in such situations, and as I said previously, I don't want to connect hardware wallets to a device I use every day, like my phone.

I can say that the Ibis wallet is already my main wallet on Android (my tablet). I'm really enjoying it, I have a restored wallet on it with a small amount, nothing too risky to lose, another larger portion is in my hardware wallet (Trezor), which being USB-only, I only use on my laptop. I can say it's my main desktop wallet (trezor suite, sparrow + Trezor), but I also don't feel safe using an Android desktop or tablet in public. In such situations, I keep some funds in my iOS software wallet, like Stack, Coinomi or Bluewallet... and I rarely use coin_control, since I usually only use 1 or 2 utxos.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:26:59 PM

True, the forum is use to casinos labeling as NO KYC even while they request at certain questionable circumstances, but the problem here is that the words on both sides don't link, a much better presentation for clearer understanding would work.

I see the casino is ready to launch signature campaign, I advise them to reconnect with the manager to properly guide them on how to present their ANN and Website without contradicting each other. All these contradiction are becoming flaws at first glance.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:26:59 PM

However, the thing you found is significantly different and isn't the same thing as 'we don't request KYC by default'. Those terms state that you can't even play, deposit or withdraw without undergoing KYC first. Very contradicting indeed!

Quote from: DYING_S0UL on Today at 04:28:30 PM

Quote from: https://casinok.com/legal/kyc-policy

All users must complete the KYC process before they are allowed to deposit, withdraw, or play with real money.

When you say MUST, there is nothing else that needs saying. Wink

It is very contradicting between their KYC terms and the banner advertisement. Their KYC terms are actually different than other casinos that use No-KYC advertisements but have their terms that KYC can be required in some situations.

With CasinOK, at least with the findings, KYC is for all users, and it's a must, before users can deposit money to play there. So, it's very contradicting and confusing.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:03:06 AM

I am not sure what you mean when you say "address based control" but I guess it has that too. The default gap limit is 20 unused receiving addresses. I don't think you can increase this limit, though. You can generate native sewgwit, legacy, lightning, multisig, and taproot wallets.

On Android I use Trezor suite, since it works with my HW and it's not too bad.
There, when I spend, I can use coin control, which is a step forward. However, I just see a list of inputs and addresses which doesn't help much.
Electrum for PC has the addresses tab where I can label them. Even more, I can right click one or more addresses and set to spend only from there - no matter there is one input or more there, Electrum will do the math. This imho helps keeping funds from various sources distinct - i.e. more privacy.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:03:06 AM

Putting aside the hardware wallet support that lacks, Blue Wallet for Android has good coin control and labelling features for all your UTXOs. I personally prefer to keep my hardware wallets as far away from phones as I can, but I understand that other people may have different needs.

I do understand your point, but keeping coins in hot wallets is something I try to avoid as much as possible.
However, I also use HW from Android rather seldom, but I'm not that extreme to "keep my hardware wallets as far away from phones as I can"

Weekly update (2026-04-17_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1776393246 1 5519917.msg66623686 252510 3753717
1776393157 1 5224503.msg66625250 198573 2003859
1776392470 1 5519917.msg66623676 252510 3600622
1776392289 1 5519917.msg66623388 252510 3529859
1776392053 1 5519917.msg66622304 252510 3700266
1776391795 1 5580483.msg66625254 1634336 3442100
1776391280 1 5580483.msg66625236 3442100 1634336
1776390501 1 5224503.msg66625085 2003859 198573
1776389938 1 5522781.msg64846922 3442100 1000813
1776388874 1 5580401.msg66622311 1711698 2755792
1776386090 1 5580260.msg66624139 33156 2776678
1776386018 4 5580260.msg66623560 33156 3383763
1776385060 2 5565816.msg66413744 3647116 3588053
1776384892 1 5563728.msg66625124 3723796 2737799
1776384808 1 5579477.msg66584995 2776678 3491360
1776384769 2 5574872.msg66420965 2776678 3368141
1776384721 1 5156835.msg51544945 2776678 2423488
1776384675 1 5579358.msg66586668 2819049 3434176
1776384494 2 178336.msg66624044 64507 33156
1776383170 1 5580474.msg66625068 2776678 35
1776382658 2 5580208.msg66614866 3567660 3736035
1776382645 1 5580123.msg66612963 140584 11425
1776382505 1 5450786.msg62175955 1000813 2762272
1776382495 1 5580075.msg66608724 1000813 3753546
1776382485 1 5579022.msg66569314 1000813 3466646
1776382463 1 5579841.msg66598696 1000813 3735576
1776382442 1 5580146.msg66611747 1000813 3442100
1776382423 1 5580337.msg66619609 1000813 745781
1776382394 1 5579969.msg66604176 1000813 3698160
1776382377 1 5579812.msg66597728 1000813 745781
1776382353 1 5580057.msg66608041 1000813 3735576
1776382340 1 5580139.msg66611557 1000813 552276
1776382334 1 178336.msg66624458 252510 64507
1776382325 1 5579534.msg66587176 1000813 3704588
1776382317 1 5580201.msg66616645 557798 846936
1776382314 1 5580201.msg66614694 557798 1174868
1776382309 2 5580201.msg66614212 557798 846936
1776382300 1 5580319.msg66618888 1000813 2762272
1776382287 1 5580430.msg66623088 1000813 3442100
1776382271 1 5580135.msg66611515 1000813 552276
1776381932 1 178336.msg66624044 252510 33156
1776381802 1 5580208.msg66623173 3567660 3542569
1776381761 1 5580208.msg66615889 3567660 3645972
1776381729 1 5580208.msg66615247 3567660 65636
1776381695 1 5530314.msg66623479 938833 831523
1776381581 2 5580206.msg66624112 3567660 3729918
1776381547 2 5580206.msg66622522 3567660 3688462
1776381526 1 5580206.msg66620850 3567660 3725618
1776381361 1 5580299.msg66622303 1827294 753396
1776381307 2 5573344.msg66620178 407174 1626490
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (56 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2453 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:34:06 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to devouring-DARKNESS (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:32:37 AM CEST, Hueristic (history) sent 1 Merit to DireWolfM14 (history) for Re: 🏈🏈 The American Football Discussion Thread 🏈🏈.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:21:10 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Bright0515 (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:18:09 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Sim_card (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:14:13 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Loyang (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (588 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8537 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 884 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3753546: mobilelegend (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3753604: pixelsort (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3753630: Anatolii83 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3753717: devouring-DARKNESS (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3753854: wizardotools (history) earned: 13 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3750739: Aventas
3750779: Bitsolo.me
3750843: crypto-vegas
3751018: 0trace
3751023: BitaniaExchange
3751038: sats2usd
3751069: katzamit99
3751114: Cassius55
3751274: bisasam
3751306: broccolo9
3751426: REAleksij
3751431: fibonacciopstan
3751510: mike.io
3751516: IgnotusNemo
3751609: Kasynoir
3751662: GFOXOG
3751715: Daniel8874
3751788: Nick Finney
3751838: David2026$
3752009: toake
3752048: DeFCoN Network
3752205: Aliciaworld
3752224: Misa Amane
3752237: Niza888
3752313: pscamillo
3752326: asidonline
3752336: Hoke1996
3752446: BitcoinBTGS
3752453: Primark
3752508: John SwapSpace
3752520: BluebloodCXVI
3752555: KycNotList
3752716: jizzjazz
3752795: criptounlocker
3752872: SoloFury
3753044: Cyborg T-33
3753141: tfbets
3753171: CasinoIndex
3753207: Almhissn
3753257: SolvoCard.com
3753281: Adanali
3753372: mirekua
3753444: Criptano
3753482: Qatrol
3753487: tas0000
3753546: mobilelegend
3753604: pixelsort
3753630: Anatolii83
3753717: devouring-DARKNESS
3753854: wizardotools

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8537
4:0:884
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14350:14384
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2557
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:308
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1485
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3750739:0:2
3750779:0:1
3750843:0:2
3751018:0:1
3751023:0:4
3751038:0:2
3751069:0:2
3751114:0:17
3751274:0:3
3751306:0:3
3751426:0:5
3751431:0:1
3751510:0:1
3751516:0:3
3751609:0:1
3751662:0:1
3751715:0:6
3751788:0:2
3751838:0:1
3752009:0:1
3752048:0:5
3752205:0:1
3752224:1:7
3752237:0:4
3752313:0:11
3752326:0:8
3752336:0:1
3752446:0:1
3752453:0:1
3752508:0:2
3752520:0:1
3752555:2:15
3752716:0:1
3752795:0:4
3752872:0:1
3753044:0:1
3753141:0:1
3753171:0:2
3753207:2:4
3753257:0:1
3753281:0:2
3753372:0:1
3753444:0:1
3753482:0:2
3753487:0:1
3753546:0:2
3753604:0:1
3753630:0:2
3753717:0:1
3753854:0:13

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51245
Sample

Code:

1. 20616 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1109 unique users in 11917 transactions
2. 20302 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 746 unique users in 11143 transactions
3. 18891 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9985 transactions
4. 15353 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 479 unique users in 8839 transactions
5. 14384 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1223 unique users in 5170 transactions
6. 13309 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 716 unique users in 8813 transactions
7. 12222 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 583 unique users in 4642 transactions
8. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
9. 11707 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 491 unique users in 6488 transactions
10. 11290 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6454 transactions
11. 11279 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6560 transactions
12. 11110 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 508 unique users in 5787 transactions
13. 10741 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 581 unique users in 6176 transactions
14. 9997 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 330 unique users in 5141 transactions
15. 9803 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 644 unique users in 5325 transactions
16. 9689 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 338 unique users in 3502 transactions
17. 9678 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 459 unique users in 4834 transactions
18. 9640 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 397 unique users in 3359 transactions
19. 9618 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 531 unique users in 4474 transactions
20. 9590 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 543 unique users in 4326 transactions
21. 9586 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 439 unique users in 5240 transactions
22. 8954 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 538 unique users in 4845 transactions
23. 8645 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 571 unique users in 5099 transactions
24. 8633 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 455 unique users in 5123 transactions
25. 8626 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 404 unique users in 4465 transactions
26. 8537 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 407 unique users in 902 transactions
27. 8534 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4854 transactions
28. 7899 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 457 unique users in 4356 transactions
29. 7571 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4118 transactions
30. 7385 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 585 unique users in 4396 transactions
31. 7143 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 404 unique users in 3648 transactions
32. 7006 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 231 unique users in 1800 transactions
33. 6770 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 198 unique users in 3903 transactions
34. 6738 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 380 unique users in 3407 transactions
35. 6677 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 277 unique users in 3019 transactions
36. 6662 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 390 unique users in 3641 transactions
37. 6651 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 946 unique users in 4317 transactions
38. 6543 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 483 unique users in 3635 transactions
39. 6480 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3736 transactions
40. 6322 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 526 unique users in 3676 transactions
41. 6319 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 625 unique users in 3553 transactions
42. 6316 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 422 unique users in 3684 transactions
43. 6297 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 335 unique users in 2978 transactions
44. 6277 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 416 unique users in 3436 transactions
45. 6195 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3620 transactions
46. 6140 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 458 unique users in 3439 transactions
47. 6057 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 195 unique users in 2634 transactions
48. 6051 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 204 unique users in 3496 transactions
49. 5647 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 388 unique users in 2674 transactions
50. 5596 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 454 unique users in 3937 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51196. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51197. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51198. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51199. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51200. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51201. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51202. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51203. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51204. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51205. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51206. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51207. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51208. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51209. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51210. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51211. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51212. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51213. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51214. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51215. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51216. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51217. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51218. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51219. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51220. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51221. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51222. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51223. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51224. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51225. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51226. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51227. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51228. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51229. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51230. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51231. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51232. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51233. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51234. 1 Merit received by 0trace (#3751018) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51235. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51236. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51237. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51238. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51239. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51240. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51241. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51242. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51243. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51244. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51245. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26607
Sample

Code:

1. 73568 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 903 unique users in 12746 transactions
2. 68234 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2198 unique users in 29395 transactions
3. 67163 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3328 unique users in 17707 transactions
4. 59662 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3599 unique users in 57453 transactions
5. 58696 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4622 unique users in 33644 transactions
6. 50847 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3697 unique users in 35160 transactions
7. 44330 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2879 unique users in 15677 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38234 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2961 unique users in 31006 transactions
10. 37840 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2522 unique users in 14083 transactions
11. 34652 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1588 unique users in 13938 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 32297 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1477 unique users in 10345 transactions
14. 30717 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2123 unique users in 10760 transactions
15. 29001 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1434 unique users in 7616 transactions
16. 28011 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1686 unique users in 6611 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 23572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6457 transactions
20. 22991 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1377 unique users in 9491 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 17560 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1732 unique users in 3968 transactions
23. 16323 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 747 unique users in 6047 transactions
24. 16162 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1989 unique users in 6567 transactions
25. 16138 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1729 unique users in 7423 transactions
26. 15893 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 539 unique users in 7477 transactions
27. 15564 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1176 unique users in 9095 transactions
28. 15253 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5485 transactions
29. 14612 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1310 unique users in 8270 transactions
30. 14350 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1105 unique users in 1758 transactions
31. 14127 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1666 unique users in 7376 transactions
32. 13475 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3032 unique users in 7123 transactions
33. 13333 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3612 transactions
34. 13302 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1342 unique users in 7391 transactions
35. 13256 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1305 unique users in 5879 transactions
36. 13140 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1139 unique users in 8021 transactions
37. 13044 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 827 unique users in 6134 transactions
38. 12954 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 831 unique users in 4247 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11451 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1170 unique users in 6310 transactions
41. 10543 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 545 unique users in 3954 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8342 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1046 unique users in 3625 transactions
45. 8292 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 755 unique users in 7249 transactions
46. 8153 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 577 unique users in 7050 transactions
47. 8089 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 329 unique users in 3303 transactions
48. 8014 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 950 unique users in 3508 transactions
49. 7752 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 516 unique users in 6158 transactions
50. 7209 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 521 unique users in 4081 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26558. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26559. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26560. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26561. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26562. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26563. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26564. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26565. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26566. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26567. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26568. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26569. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26570. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26571. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26572. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26573. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26574. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26575. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26576. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26577. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26578. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26579. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26580. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26581. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26582. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26583. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26584. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26585. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26586. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26587. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26588. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26589. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26590. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26591. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26592. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26593. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26594. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26595. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26596. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26597. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26598. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26599. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26600. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26601. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26602. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26603. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26604. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26605. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26606. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26607. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 329937 (14.37%)
Tuesday 328724 (14.32%)
Wednesday 329358 (14.35%)
Thursday 349683 (15.23%)
Friday 347478 (15.14%)
Saturday 303012 (13.20%)
Sunday 306617 (13.36%)
Total: 2294809

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: julerz12 on April 23, 2026, 01:44:10 PM

Another simple giveaway is launched by EarnBet on their official X (Twitter) page.
Simply guess the number (1-100) and win a "reward" - no idea what or how much it would be, probably some free spins. Cheesy

-snip-

Winners have been announced, congrats to all who got the prizes (still have no idea what it is, though) Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on April 21, 2026, 03:50:50 PM

Here is an even crazier session and even bigger win! This time it was triggered on Nolimit City's Tombstone R.I.P. The lucky player triggered free spins with a $0.10 bet and managed to get the maximum multiplier of 300,000x.

Watch the video on X below:
https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2046548210852696242

Crazy win for that lucky guy. Geez. $0.10 to $30k real quick. Talk about being kissed by Lady Luck. I wish I had similar luck, but, alas, I always end up burning my small bankroll on slots. Roll Eyes

It seems EarnBet has also given a few tips for random replies on that post, pretty generous of them: https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2047754195957055516

Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 08:16:57 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:51:12 AM

Little Mouse je objavio da je pauzirana Duel.com kampanja:

Znaci cryptofrka i ja odosmo na burzu.

S obzirom da je forum pun ko brod, trebalo bi nekako pomoci nama koji ostanemo bez kampanje. Ono recimo svaki tjedan $50, i tako par tjedana ili dok ne nadjemo novu kampanju. Cisto da imamo za kladionicu i slicne osnovne zivotne potrebe. Cheesy

Evo LM je najavio neke nove kampanje i da ce probati da vrati neke clanove. Tako da neces sigurno biti dugo bez kampanje,ni ti ni Frka. Gledacu da azuriram tablicu redovno pa baci oko,mozda bude nesto i kod hampuza,on ima dosta dugorocne kampanje. Svakako prati thread Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on April 23, 2026, 03:38:29 PM

That's not the only fake Sparrow wallet currently hosted on the App Store. In fact, I can't even see it right now. Maybe they already deleted it. There is another one. I will post a broken link to it in case you guys want to report it and help in it getting removed from the store.

(https) ://apps.apple.com/de/app/ sparrow-mobile-wallet-m-sig/ id6762899665

You literally had a similar post on August last year when Jimmy Ramirez lost his 7.4BTC due to similar Fake sparrow wallet on his IPhone . It’s been heating up since then..
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5552731.0

I’m wondering how similar apps keep making it to AppStore after Apple removed almost same thing in the past, didn’t they record the complaint then ? So how come we have something similar again . Their review process should be questioned fr

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:24:08 AM

How do you even help people like that Huh

Even without knowing the details, you have the same reaction to those who read the thread.
His initial "demands" are quite interesting but after a while, we convinced him that Electrum isn't at fault,
You'll probably enjoy reading that thread, it's still in the first page of Electrum board BTW.

It's getting off-topic so, that'll be my last reply about it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:13:29 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on April 23, 2026, 11:35:25 PM

^^
You have been in this forum for at least three years and based on that and based on what you have shared, your gambling experience dates back even further (at least five years). Let’s suppose it’s only three years of experience! You are supposed to know how casino promotions work, right?

If lothian's argument is that the casino isn't being transparent about the wagering requirements for the first deposit sports bonus then I agree with him. They don't mention it in the accompanying TOS. The question is, why would an essential piece of information be missing from there, and why should players be looking for that information in other places? That omittance can only be intentional. It's even worse if you have to deposit and claim the bonus to only then be told what the wagering requirement is.

That is exactly what I am asking. Not sure what khaled is waffling about - it´s very normal to want to see the ts&cs of a bonus, otherwise you are playing with it blind and the wagering could be 10x, it could be 100x. It could be 2x max winnings, it could be uncapped winnings. But of course, Khaled would know that as he has over 3000 posts Grin

Hopefully the OP can respond and give a little more insight! Casino looks good nonetheless! Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:51:12 AM

Little Mouse je objavio da je pauzirana Duel.com kampanja:

Znaci cryptofrka i ja odosmo na burzu. Cry

S obzirom da je forum pun ko brod, trebalo bi nekako pomoci nama koji ostanemo bez kampanje. Ono recimo svaki tjedan $50, i tako par tjedana ili dok ne nadjemo novu kampanju. Cisto da imamo za kladionicu. Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:54:21 PM

Quote from: lothian on Today at 03:27:21 PM

Hey guys, do you have an example of how much id have to wager to unlock x amount on the sports bonus? I wanted to deposit a few hundred dollars but dont want to get stung with hefty wagering or winnings caps like other casinos do. Maybe an example of if i deposited say $100 would be helpful, before i actually take the plunge.

Thanks!

Casinos usually mention this in their Terms & Conditions but I can't find the information on Vave's website. There is a pop-up for the first deposit sports bonus but it doesn't mention what the playthrough requirement is.

It says the following:

Quote

All information about the wager is available by clicking on the “info” tab in the bonus card.

Can you try to find this in your account somewhere? If not, get in touch with their support and ask them directly.

Thanks for the reply. Yeah I was hopnig to find out BEFORE taking the bonus, just so I know what im getting myself into haha!

Quote from: nc50lc on April 22, 2026, 04:01:39 AM

Quote

I explained what I meant above, but you still didn't answer my specific question. If I back up my wallet to the cloud in any form, then it is no longer self-custodial because the cloud storage service provider has access to it like Dropbox?

From the limited info that we know about the wallet, yes, but I explained why it depends on the factors that I've mentioned.
So don't expect a simple "yes" or "no" answer to this.

What I'm saying is, my reply is about categorizing it as a "Web Wallet", being self-custodial or custodial depends on those factors.

Why? What has the backup solution does to do with who has custody of my wallet if it is encrypted? I can back up my wallet as long as it is encrypted in any way that I want to, that won't change that I am the only person who has custody to it. To claim that an Electrum wallet that is backed up to the cloud this way stops being self-custodial is just silly.. How exactly do they have custody of my wallet? I can understand your point fine if we talk about a wallet that is not encrypted or a plain text seed phrase, but when it is encrypted I can't. People may not like the cloud as a back up solution, they may rightfully say that it is insecure too, but that doesn't change the definition of things or suddenly give custody in impossible scenarios.

Quote from: satscraper on April 22, 2026, 05:49:56 AM

How do you know that it’s false? I’m starting to suspect that you’re one of them.

Nice you proceed to attack me personally I question false opinions and assumptions in this thread.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 22, 2026, 07:20:51 AM

The wallet is closed-source. No one knows what they back up and how. No one can check what the code does. They can only decide if they want to trust Tether or not.

You missed my point, next time consider spending more time reading before you write a reply because the reply does not make sense to the question that I have posed. It has nothing to do with the Tether wallet.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 22, 2026, 07:20:51 AM

Quote from: Dogedegen on April 21, 2026, 05:35:41 PM

As I said this is nothing new, you need to ask the whole shitcoin space first and not Tether only.

This discussion is not about the entire shitcoin or altcoin space or other altcoin wallets. It's about Tether and the Tether Wallet.

Instead of admitting that you are wrong, you decide to be rude for no good reason. This is not a new feature. If you have failed to understand where it comes from and why, the problem is on you for being outdated. The concept is not new and I can remember it being at least a couple of years old if not longer. And it is going to spread more whether you like it or not.

Quote from: ABCbits on April 22, 2026, 09:06:35 AM

FWIW, it's common to see people angry at an exchange for freeze their coin with claim following regulation. Sometimes it's because their system is very strict/paranoid, but such reason also misused to steal people's coin by never unfreezing user's coin even after you send document. For reference, Freewallet is known to doing the latter for many years.

There are cases where companies abuse these rules that is not disputable, but to claim that very reputable and extremely rich companies are doing this because they want to is at best just childish. It shows inexperience with topics relating to business and regulations.

Why would anyone want to do something as a business that only hurts them? Why would someone who owns billions of dollars and is extremely profitable selectively try to scam someone out of $50 000 or $5m? It does not add up as it does not make logical or business sense. Because of that we can't group everyone who ever does any kind of freezing together. We must separate legal and reputable entities from those that selectively scam like some swap services have been doing in the last couple of years. Do people not know what happens to an company like Coinbase or Tether in the US if they refuse to comply with a freezing order? They may not even agree with the order, but why would they spend millions of dollars in legal fees to fight in favor of some random customer?

I just realized that examplens' PM was indeed sent, but it doesn't show up on LoyceVs' PM publisher page. So I'm posting this screenshot as proof of his prediction :

Everyone has sent their PM, so here are your predictions for round 16 :

Name	Prediction	B/M
Hypnotizer	75 098,45	0,25% malus
Leahized	75 120,00
Pmalek	76 407,00
cryptofrka	76 750,00
ESG	76 930,84	0,00% malus
examplens	78 260,00	1,00% malus
LoyceV	82 194,65

And the user protected by LoyceV is... LoyceV !! It’s easy to see why he’s so courageously bullish this time .

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:50:13 AM

Quote from: Trofo on April 22, 2026, 07:46:54 AM

Pmalek? Jel došlo vrijeme da te vidimo u nekom promu? Za wc dodat ćemo 2 nova promoa, oba sponzorina od strane Rainbeta. Svaki 100mBTC.

Super, što nas je više to bolje, a ako se još netko zainteresira možda uspijemo sastaviti i 3 lokalna tima sa našeg područja Grin

Quote from: Publictalk792 on Today at 05:59:44 AM

What do you guys think? Is it time to start work on Crypto Flexibility and swappable signature parts by Bitcoin developers or is it another excitement to put unproven fear? Personally, I believe that it is just as bad as being broke to be late in security.

The developers are not idle in anticipating it, but the current situation has not yet found the best option. However, from the Trezor application, I once discussed on local media that they are ready for quantum. They have created Trezor Safe 7. This Trezor combines a security system between TROPIC01 + EAL6, TROPIC01 is a chip made by Trezor, while EAL6 (security certification). Even the US, through the FEDERAL government, officially bans ECDSA cryptography starting in 2030 with a final deadline in 2035.

On the global sub-board at Development & Technical Discussion, he Pmalek also created a thread titled J. Lopp's Post-Quantum Migration BIP. I also read that this situation seems to be neglected because developers apparently have not taken much action yet. But actually, this BIP 360 Proposal has been added to https://github.com/bitcoin/bips. This was also written by him, ABCbits, in the Thread Quantum threat ignored by Bitcoin developers.

Recently, there is a BIP-361 proposal that plans to lock old wallet addresses. This proposal contains a suggestion to freeze more than 6.5 million BTC stored in UTXOs that are vulnerable to quantum attacks, including more than around one million coins related to Satoshi. However, this proposal is still under debate and has sparked controversy between two camps. But this step is considered unlikely to save 1.7 million Bitcoins according to Cardano (ADA) Founder, Charles Hoskinson. Even BIP 361 proposer James Lopp feels that this proposal is not entirely regarded as good. But Lopp also thinks there is no better alternative than the one he made.

Quote from: https://x.com/lopp/status/2044406134178795748?s=20

Thoughts on BIP-361:

* I know folks don't like it. I don't like it myself. I wrote it because I like the alternative even less.

* It isn't a spec, nor is it proposed for activation. It's a rough idea for a contingency plan that needs more R&D.

* I hope it never needs to be considered for adoption.

* Ultimately, my thesis is that in the face of existential threat, individual economic incentives outweigh philosophical principles.

CMIIW

Sources:
1. https://id.beincrypto.com/bip-361-hoskinson-satoshi-bitcoin-kuantum/
2. https://x.com/lopp/status/2044406134178795748?s=20
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5550298.0
4. https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2026/02/23/bitcoin-took-its-first-step-against-quantum-computers/

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 12:54:31 PM

It's now possible to buy a SeedSigner Plus battery edition that works with 3 AAA batteries and doesn't require any other cable connection.

XMRSTREET has done amazing job with this SeedSigner modifications!
Having version with regular AAA batteries is great, but my absolute favorite is SeedSigner+ slim version that works with Satochip cards.
You can always use any powerbank as a battery source, and they are even selling blank javacards that can be loaded with Satochip code.

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 07:46:54 AM

Bilo je i vrijeme da ga otkrijes Grin

Šta se tiče ovog novog promoa da, hrvatska će sigurno imati 2 tima, ima nas puno u bsfl. Pricekjte da postamo više detalja u novom threadu a onda samo naprijed. Mozda se i još netko s lokala bude htio uključiti. Ako ste dobri s nekime s lokala ovo je idalna prilika za ga pokupiti makar i ako nije dio bsfla.

Pmalek? Jel došlo vrijeme da te vidimo u nekom promu? Za wc dodat ćemo 2 nova promoa, oba sponzorina od strane Rainbeta. Svaki 100mBTC.

Čekaj, čekaj... Kakav novi promo? Kakvi timovi? Čovječe, malo mi se zagužva na poslu da ne stignem pratiti thread i odmah neke novosti. Stvarno će biti nešto kao reprezentacija ili će se BSFL članovi sami organizirati u timove?

Meni zapravo nije jasno zašto netko tko voli sport nije u BSFL-u. Ja koji stvarno ne pratim sport baš uživam u BSFL-u i FPL Challenge-u.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 21, 2026, 03:50:50 PM

This is insane... but I think this is a bonus buy. Look at his balance, 0.00. He either bought Hang 'Em High with the last $7, or, even crazier, he played normally and hit the bonus round with the last $0.1...

And he was so lucky to trigger BootHill after a few spins... Crazy lucky! Cool

Quote from: TopTort777 on Today at 07:12:29 AM

Does this apply to Sugar Rush or any slot game that allow to buy super bonuses? Do I get it right, only buying super bonus or variations of it, allows to get maximum from playing slots.

Super buys give you a better starting position, higher multipliers, or more spins... all that depends on a slot. In any case, all that gives you higher chances for max win, but as you can see from Pmalek's share, you can hit max win even with normal playing/normal bonus buy... I am not really sure how this guy won first bonus, and that zero balance is a bit strange...

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 07:36:40 AM

Inače, moram vam čestitati, nisam prije obraćao pažnju na vaše BSFL natjecanje ali napravili ste sjajan posao s time, svaka čast!
Kako ćete formirati timove, hoćemo li formirati lokalni tim, ja, slackovic, rikafip i pokazati ostalima što znamo? Grin

Bilo je i vrijeme da ga otkrijes Grin

Quote from: SirJohnVonSlotty on Today at 07:36:57 AM

Eto me nazad. Malo sam se opet aktivirala.

Da najavim dolazak novog casina, taman otvorio ANN: Rooli Online Casino

Budem ga još nadogradio, za sada sam samo htio launchat. Ima još više detalja na mirror sajtu ovdje: Try Rooli

Bit ću otvoren za komentare kao i uvijek

Pa ti si živ? Preživio si bombe koje su padale po Dubaju? Grin

Dobrodošao nazad na forum i želim ti sve najbolje s novim casino projektom.
Kao što je pmalek već primjetio, šteta što nema sport betinga, vjerojatno bi ti se onda pridružilo i više članova, posebno s našeg lokala.
Trofo i cryptofrka su nas već razmazili sa BSFL sportskim natjecanjem ali čini se da ne ''ciljaš'' na nas, sportaše Grin

Quote from: Pmalek on April 21, 2026, 03:50:50 PM

Bets on their Blackjack are blowing up, too. Geez. Look at those numbers. $30k, $48k, $42k wins. Shocked

Source: https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2046674942880580037

Quote from: Cryptomultiplier on April 21, 2026, 06:17:17 PM

Gamblers do make such decisions because betting small amounts most of the times is just a waste of time and resources .

So, it's a risk big, win big strategy. Very fitting for someone with a gigantic bankroll. Grin

BTW, I wouldn't call it a waste of time when you're just betting small amounts, as long as you're having fun doing it. But, I guess, people who see it as that (a waste of time) are only after profits and have forgotten how to make gambling fun and entertaining. Although I'd probably think the same if I had a similar huge bankroll like them. Why go small when you can always go big, right? The image above is one big example of it.

Quote from: satscraper on Today at 06:07:49 AM

Tether.wallet simply gives company more visibility into users' tokens, which facilitates freezing actions. The underlying power of relevant smart contract functions remains exactly the same.

No it does not, simply because you say it it does not make it true. They do not need the wallet for anything related to freezing. They do not do anything relating to freezing on their own will, they are following regulations and issue freezes only when they need to. So a claim that they would build a whole wallet to gather more information on users that they will selectively freeze is false.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:07:27 AM

Where is the difference between an original or a copy of a digital file? For instance, would you be comfortable sending me a copy of the seed phrases you use, passwords, or any other secrets? Remember, it's just a copy. You will get to keep the original. Does it matter if I have the original or a digital copy of your private information and data?

If there were no differences between an original and a copy, why would we invent the world backup? It seems that you guys are hell bent on proving some weird case that you keep missing the obvious. A wallet that is hosted on your phone and backed up to the cloud whether by you or by some third party service is a completely different setup than a wallet that only exists in the cloud. That is the difference that I am trying to talk about. It is so easy to understand, what is the problem?

Quote from: nc50lc on Today at 04:13:48 AM

but it can't be categorized as "self-custodial" unless you can verify that you are the only one who's in custody of your wallet.

I explained what I meant above, but you still didn't answer my question. If I back up my wallet to the cloud in any form, then it is no longer self-custodial because the service provider has access to it like Dropbox?

Quote from: Pmalek on April 13, 2026, 07:10:15 AM

People should be careful when using Exolix. It's an instant exchange that requires KYC from its users and performs AML checks but that doesn't always mean that you will receive "clean" and "safe" funds. In this example, they sent one customer stolen funds that were later frozen and confiscated by another exchange. They admitted their mistake but didn't want to do anything to rectify it.

You are right about Exolix, but I think Unstoppable wallet now have integrated rating system before initiating any exchange.
So now you are going to see warning if exchange can ask you for KYC verification with different risk levels, and you can just skip or disable it later.
There is also settings that can be enabled for Secure Send and Phishing Check.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:27:44 PM

Quote from: tbtftg on Today at 12:40:04 PM

Why is it obvious? It is obvious to me that the only ethical option is freezing them and that is not at all because of the influence of those additional coins to the price.

It's not ethical to freeze or confiscate something that doesn't belong to you.

Quote from: tbtftg on Today at 12:40:04 PM

I do not believe their effect will be significant, there are other much more significant factors (*). What greatly bothers me is that letting them taken encourages and rewards the thieves.

Bitcoin has functioned that way from day one. The moment someone gets a copy of your keys, they get access to your coins. In other words, the thieves who stole the keys get rewarded but the network is doing what it's supposed to do and there shouldn't be any meddling. It's your job to protect your secrets. The one who first presents the right signing keys gets the reward.

Quote from: tbtftg on Today at 12:40:04 PM

I am perfectly fine if those forgotten coins are not frozen but instead, for example, donated to some charity, and thus added to the circulating supply but not via theft.

That's also theft and stealing. You would be taking someone else's coins and deciding what to do with them.
Who gets to decide when certain coins can be considered forgotten and ripe for the taking? How much time must pass before they get that status? Old wallets that have been dormant for many years wake up sometimes and people have the right to never spend their coins if they don't want to. That doesn't mean others should be able to take them or even donate them.

As you can see, this is a very complex question.

This really comes down to property rights. If coins are still technically accessible via private keys, then they are not abandoned in any legal or ethical sense, regardless of how long they’ve been dormant.

Quote from: iv4n on April 20, 2026, 06:58:26 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on April 20, 2026, 03:33:13 PM

One EarnBet player had a very prolific weekend. After playing Sugar Rush 1000, this individual won $25,789 with a $5 base bet. That's a multiplier of 5158x.

It's x10. ... You can see in the image you shared: Bet Size $2500...

This is a super bonus buy, with a $5 base bet, it's all there:

Did I get it correct? Players bet 5 bucks but then purchased 2500 bonus and Gods of random brought him 10x multiplier during bonus spins. Damn I wish I understand logic how some gamblers play. What was on his mind when he decided to buy such a huge bonus with such a comparably low bet.

I am not a slots player and I have a question. Is it possible to by playing 1-5 bet per spin and having 2500 budget (that is 500-2500 spins) win same 25k bucks? Are 500-2500 spins a lot for slots or not?

Quote from: aylabadia05 on April 20, 2026, 05:54:28 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on April 20, 2026, 03:33:13 PM

One EarnBet player had a very prolific weekend. After playing Sugar Rush 1000, this individual won $25,789 with a $5 base bet. That's a multiplier of 5158x.
Unfortunately, EarnBet hasn't posted a video, showing the win, but there is an image and post of it on their X profile. Not a bad day to end the week at all.

What a stroke of luck for that player. A sensational win.
Winning $25,789 like this isn’t a small amount when converted to my local currency here.
I’ll convert $20,000 to Bitcoin—whatever the amount I end up with—and use the remaining $5,789 to have some fun with different games, trying my luck and gaining new experiences with various types of games.

When a player is able to bet $2500, his initial deposit must be a huge amount. If I have to guess the amount he won from the above bet is still lower than his initial bankroll and I believe this amount is not that big for the player. Of course if we win that amount, we will withdraw most of the winning amount but for this player, I believe he continues his gambling session until he wins more or until he lose it back

Round 15 is now over, here are the results :

Closing price on 20/04/2026 : 75 875$

Name	Prediction	Difference
LoyceV	75 898,57	23,57
examplens	76 016,00	141,00
ESG	75 678,34	196,66
Leahized	75 421,00	454,00
Hypnotizer	75 398,56	476,44
Pmalek	75 214,00	661,00
xLays	75 067,00	808,00
cryptofrka	100 000,00	24 125,00

LoyceV, you think you are being smart, but well... ok you are the smartest one in this round. Here's 50BTC. Make good use of it.

Cryptofrka, are you the Chosen One ? Because when you do something stupid, you dodge bullets like Neo ? This time, it’s a random chance caused by LoyceV that save your butt. You avoid elimination.
This round needed a victim, and it’s you xLays, who’s paying the price. You are finally free, you are now eliminated. But before you leave, you must use your Last Will card. Give me two names from among the remaining players to whom you will give 34BTC.

Now let’s talk about round 16, the last of the three bloody rounds.
The previous rules apply, and ESG suggested an idea to me. And this is the perfect time to implement it.
As with one other round, you can only make one prediction via LoyceV’s PM publisher.
But in addition, the last three people to submit their predictions will receive a malus (0.25%, 0.50%, and 0.75%).
Don’t blame me, blame ESG for this round. We will see if your math skills are useful.

Round 16 : The return of the Bloody round
What will be the price of Bitcoin at April 26, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 20/04/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before April 23, 2026, 06:00:00 PM.

Cash shop: OPEN

Special rules :
The two players with the worst predictions will lose a life.
LoyceV has to protect someone.

As with round 10, submit your prediction to LoyceV’s PM publisher. Click here for instructions.
If you are not sure about the delay, set it to “delay=4”

Quote from: Pmalek on April 19, 2026, 06:52:49 AM

That's very unusual indeed. I didn't actually bet or play any games when I did my testing. I just browsed around the different sites to see if I would experience anything out of the ordinary. I didn't. Try to load and log in to the website in a new incognito window without any active extensions to see if that will make a difference. The weird thing is that the games were initially playable on your end and then they were blocked the next second.

I did it yesterday because the support team also suggested the same thing but unfortunately it didn't work and you know that made me stop playing here for a while. A few hours ago the support team contacted me via email saying everything was back to normal but I haven't had time to check it yet, Anyway, I think there are still a lot of things that are not normal here, I mean they need to keep updating it.

Notifying others, not all will be aware.

@Qjmak333
@Mr. Magkaisa
@Itz-prisigold
@Pmalek
@InGod
@Road21Bitcoin
@ASK Day

Received mine, thanks.

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Quote from: Pmalek on April 19, 2026, 03:36:39 PM

Između ostalog, Trezor radi sa ChangeNOW i Changelly koje treba izbjegavati u širokom luku. Ko se odluči da koristi Trezorovu swap uslugu, treba da ručno izabere swap provajdera sa liste nakon što detaljno istraži o kakvoj se usluzi radi ako želi da bude siguran da neće biti problema.

Taj Trezor Suite ima neke glupe visoke naknade za nihov swap service, i ne isplati se koristiti ga.
Doslovno ga nikad nisam koristio, a nekoliko puta sam pokušao samo da vidim koliko dodatno naplaćuju.

A sad su stavili i ovo:

Quote

Trading will be temporarily unavailable on April 22nd from 11:00 to 12:00 CEST due to scheduled maintenance.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:33:13 PM

One EarnBet player had a very prolific weekend. After playing Sugar Rush 1000, this individual won $25,789 with a $5 base bet. That's a multiplier of 5158x.

It's x10,315... You can see in the image you shared: Bet Size $2500...

This is a super bonus buy, with a $5 base bet, it's all there:

I bought many super bonuses on this slot... $100 & $200, and maybe I bought some more expensive, but who will remember from all the slots I played and bought super bonuses? Cool

In any case, super bonuses are different... and they can be pretty expensive. At the same time, buying super bonuses can turn into a disaster pretty easily... Big bets, huge volatility, crazy excitement, and many times you will get less than 10% of the bonus buy...
There are no guarantees, it's just a spin that costs a lot, opens some features, but nobody knows what will happen... so good luck!