One thing I noticed about this casino is that before they allowed someone to loan from their platform the said gambler must have loose seriously couples with the person being in their VIP rank.
The said amount which you mentioned above is extremely high, I would want to know how this is being calculated, because it's actually hard for someone to deposit up to that amount, even as some people do not go higher than 100$ per week.
Is it the total amount deposited and the amount wagered, lose and win, the commutative of all gives the total submission of someone being into the VIP rank?

This actually means for you to get the loan you must have spent huge amount of money gambling on the casino.
There is no way a casino will just wake up and create a loan option for the customers just like that, when I saw the news I already knew to get the loan you most have spent a lot on the casino site.
 
Creating the loan option is actually very good however, since it’s just for VIPs, I believe it is also a way to attract or make people to use the casino more often so they can get to a point they can be eligible for the loan.

Da, to je vjerojatno neka ljudska psihologija da si uspješan tek kada se možeš pohvaliti drugima i dobiti njihovo poštovanje i divljenje.
To me podsjeća na Kim Kardashian, koja praktički živi na društvenim mrežama i hvali se svojim bogatstvom, putovanjima, luksuznim stilom života itd sve dok joj to nije došlo na naplatu u hotelu u Parizu kada joj je provalnik upao u hotelsku sobu i opljačkao je.
Na njezinim društvenim mrežama lopovi su mogli vidjeti i kakav nakit nosi i u kojem hotelu će biti pa se zapravo nisu morali previše ni truditi.
Mislim da je nakon toga iskustva ipak promijenila svije ponašanje na društvenim mrežama i postala malo pametnija i da više pazi na svoju sigurnost.

Congratulations to our event winners! Pmalek & TryNinja

BTC price closed: $79,093.84

Avaitor games also qualify as a kind if crash game, if an right because the airplane moves until it crashes and within this time frame, you either get a good multiplier or have your bankroll emptied. I never liked avaitor games though to be sincere and it won't be a pick for me, but I would rather go for a fast paced game like dice and plinko which I believe gives me the player more control over the kind of risk am exposed to.

They could add a probably fair game like plinko or mines. That would make a great addition for me.

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

None. None of them are provably fair and follow the minimum industry standards.

Thanks for sharing. I answered Crash. I like that particular original game. Simple animation, usually a rocket that goes to the moon. 
As for some suggestions, I don't know if there's an original game out there that works similarly to Flappy Bird - you know, that old Android game (IDK if it was available back then on iOS) wherein the tiny bird flaps its wings to go through a series of pipes (pipes like the ones in Mario games). This could probably work like a crash game, right?

Of course.  I'm not saying that there is some sort of a terminal flaw in the theoretical logic.  That would be silly.  I am saying that it would have been better to avoid any such situations which could complicate user implementations or create human question marks in dusty old punched plates.  At least make it so that a null character is not necessary to account for in a 'first 4 character set' if one has the choice.  But I did not design BIP-39 (or any of the word sets) so maybe those who did have considerations which I'm not thinking of.  Maybe it was just damn difficult to find enough words?

Relatedly, consider an implementation which I have seen a number of times with CCQ where auto-completion intending to type in word autocompletes at the 2nd or 3rd letter and auto-increments to the next word and the last part of one word becomes the first part of the next.  This can bite on the last word, which is a checksum and more significantly limited in size.  A single letter mis-typed due to auto-completion of the previous word can auto-complete a word completely.  Then the total solution is considered valid.  If the code continues upon solution, then the code needs to have the ability to reliably create a show-state confirmation and means of editing reliably to fix problems.

Indeed, maybe a human interface device requiring one to fiddle with a few buttons in input a full 24 word list on a limited line display is a 'feature' after all insofar as the user cannot work fast enough to make certain kinds of mistakes.  Ergo, a usable keypad is a bug and not a feature.

Admittedly, with the consensus view in the community being a model where users only need one seed (or several in multi-sig) which controls their entire wealth, then it doesn't matter so much if reliable input is a bitch.

The best thing about free bets is that there's no such wagering requirement to withdraw the won amount. I've got free bets multiple times by some generous casinos of the forum and to be honest when I won the free bets I could withdraw the money without any such requirements. When you see wagering requirement with free spins that someone hurts new ones but when it comes to free bets then we don't need to worry at all because we can withdraw the won amount without any issues or requirements.

They can share three letters with another word, and may be complete in three-letter form.  'air' and 'airplane' come to mind.  This can cause entry problems if an algorithm aggressively solves near the end of a phrase entry cycle due to the existence of the checksum word.  If a UI moves on once a valid solution is achieved without offering the user a chance to cross-check it can be problematic, and, of course, if backing up and re-editing is mis-coded to improperly reflect a state, the results will always be disaster.  There is a pretty famous error of this nature in a machine that administered radiation in the medical field which killed some people.

But that is not the reason I'm getting cold-feet about BIP-39.

It's just creating an additional risk because the customer thinks they're buying from an authorized seller, but it turns out they're buying from someone authorized by the reseller. If Ledger allows such a practice then it should be added to the list of all the incredibly stupid things they have been doing for the past 5-6 years.

I don't know, even if the manufacturers were to remove the authorized resellers, there is still a risk in the delivery chain - pre-modified devices can be inserted into the packages at any time, whether it happens in the sorting center or is done by the delivery person during delivery.

Such packages should be "anonymous" in some way, in the sense that no one can deduce what is inside.

Hvala na upozorenju! 

Dodao sam u prvi post izvore i linkove koje sam koristio za sastavljanje vodiča, a usput sam još jednom prošao aktualne službene izvore i ažurirao tekst gdje je trebalo.

Hvala još jednom!

What you exactly need? i cant provide more , maybe its Earnbet who needs to add a reason to steal 15 000 usd of deposits and 15 000 usd of profits dont you think?

That's not what happened either. The bookmaker can easily verify this from my betting history. The live markets I bet on did not start with a minimum 2-minute delay after I placed the bets, so there wasn't some kind of late-betting or faster-feed situation.

Also, a lot of my bets were simply match-winner markets, not bets based on a specific point or moment where having faster information would give me an advantage.

These cases are many like cases in these threads with invalid results at the end.

Scam Accusation Cases Against Betting Platform on The Forum.
Scam Accusation Cases Against Betting Platform on The Forum (v.2.26.7.1)

Only time will tell us this accusation is valid or invalid, only time can tell and to make the accusation more convincing, even not surely valid, the user must add more details into the accusation post.

That’s a good point. the term usually implies that the wallet is quantum-safe unlike standard hardware wallets, meaning the client's funds are secure on their end. I still don't understand how new seed will be stored, given that their current system makes them difficult to write down on paper.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (19) 10471 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 24140: qwk (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5767 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11429 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4798 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3668 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 10092 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6918 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (14) 6807 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (37) 1952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 13887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6817 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6977 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +7 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3920 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10719 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4496 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (24) 12159 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2937 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4714 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (32) 6372 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3158 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6740 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1415 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2251 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1507 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1367 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3716 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1329 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6998 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2037 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2345 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5156 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2366 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3704 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (40) 13353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1489 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2391 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3686 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2216 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3528 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 21352 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3096 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 2612 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 5829 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5820 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3796 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1912 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4186 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (29) 8260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10190 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5395 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 982 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10071 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1298 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3627 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2285 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (8880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (15040 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Yes, I did, and if you are using Gmail, then check the Promotions tab.
Your reply gives me a clear understanding what actually is being promoted and the reality. Thanks for the deep dive into the comparison table.

Initially, I had approximately 22 ETH in total.

I first withdrew 0.25 ETH to make sure the bookmaker would pay without any problems, and I received the funds almost instantly. Then I withdrew 1 ETH, which was approximately the amount I needed to buy something.

After that, I started playing slots and unfortunately lost around 8 ETH. My final balance was around 14 ETH, so I decided to withdraw the remaining balance to avoid continuing to play casino.

I find this part odd. Why would you wd .25Eth then the next wd is 14 eth? Were all wd attempts on the same day after you had won? Just curious why you would wd a small amount then move to a large amount?

This evolution of these modified devices seems quite systematic, and is, for that very reason, truly terrifying. No one is safe from such counterfeits; the situation is reminiscent of the threat posed by quantum computers: while it may not be an immediate danger, the advancement of technology (specifically regarding the skills needed to create and disguise these counterfeit HW devices) could well create significant problems for crypto asset owners in the foreseeable future. The situation is further compounded by the rising value of cryptocurrencies, which increases the potential payoff for attackers. Consequently, your prediction could easily come true, perhaps even in the near future.

How can one protect oneself when hardware wallets, even those from official manufacturers, can no longer be trusted? By developing the concept of building these HW devices yourself.

I’m 10000% certain that I did not violate any rules or commit any fraud. I never did anything wrong, and I’m completely sure about that. I simply played normally, made my deposits, and accumulated my balance after some loses. I’m confident there is no legitimate reason for them to accuse me of fraud or refuse my withdrawal.

It's now showing.
I didn't do anything to fix it, haven't restarted my router either.

If you've tested it yesterday, that would be a good indication of what could be happening.

Many gamblers skip reading a casino’s TOS before agreeing, often due to excitement to win,  or impatience with lengthy text which is legally supported.This oversight leads to common complaints. But such claims usually stem from a misunderstanding.

Nearly every casino’s ToS contains a clause allowing the operator to amend terms at any time, without prior notice. This means a platform advertised as NoKYC can still legally introduce identity verification requirements later, freeze withdrawals, or adjust bonus conditions. But then most of us finds it difficult to read through it TCs.

It is the choice of gamblers to decide if they are going to read the terms of a casino or they are going to ignore it.
It is when problem arises that is related to breaking of the casino TOS that people can now judge if it's was the casino that was wrong or the player that complained about the casino freezing or locking his account.

It is better to do the right time now by checking what could be wrong with a casino TOS before falling to their trap.
The use of AI can come in when the player doesn't really understand the TOS of the casino very well. At least that can help to break down those rules that need to be observed.

Thanks for the explanation. Honestly I didn't know ContestHunters was more than just a place to share contests. It's interesting they have a Disputes section too, and it's still new. Some casino reps like EarnBet and others already came there to answer. Maybe later this section can be another option for cases like other players have. But the main fix should still come from Earnbet.

I wouldn't call out anyone for failing to read the Terms of Service of any platform, i mean, it can be a very long and time-consuming read. But i think people should read the important parts of the T&C, such parts are, but not limited to, the privacy policy, limitations of liability, deposits & withdrawals, etc.

I even read on the forum sometime ago that people now use AI to summarize T&C, it is not something i have personally done, i just read the parts i consider most important. But if one can use AI to get the key points of any platform, then they should do so.

Yeah, actually we were differentiating between an open code and an open-source code earlier and exodus happens to fall into the category of open code. Most essential components are hidden in private repositories, so we cannot call it open-source, but an open code, but T don't see it as to be totally categorized as close source. However, another wave of thought have flashed through my mind while I read your write-up.

Is there such situation whereby a wallet provider making every component of their code base (including the binaries) public, but restricting the legal rights of it being reproduced?

I don't know but according to the following post, it's not Betby.

This is one of those high volatility games that has the potential of multiplying payouts or cleaning up capital.

The game however doesn't fail to have its own crowd among crypto casino players and I certainly do love the theme because as a bonus spin feature, dead rockstars like Elvis, Jimi Hendrix, and Kurt Cobain become an icon feature, also even though I can hardly play this game, I am endeared to it because of it's high multiplier that's a result of its bonus feature by mathematical design.

This is definitely a very big win for the lucky player.

Yes most gamblers are very lazy to read those bogus writings about the casino and for that they missed a lot and later have problem with the casino. But the casinos in turn are not trying their best instead deceiving the gamblers in the announcement thread by saying that "No KYC". Why can't they make it clear from the announcement thread because most gamblers only read the information from the announcement thread and register in the casino and play.

Gamblers like privacy and once the see that No KYC, they are motivated to join. But within casinos will ask KYC in some extend. The forum has to address this issue clearly.

"The current implants with messy wires and shaved-down batteries are just crude 'Gen 1' proof-of-concepts. Attackers with a real budget will inevitably pivot to a full PCB Swap with exact topology cloning.The original chips, including the Secure Element, are simply hot-aired off and transplanted onto a custom multilayer board. On this new board, hackers can perfectly replicate Ledger's original routing, solder mask color, and silkscreen to match the official teardown photos, while hiding the spy components in the inner layers or blind spots.And the hardware is already commercially available to anyone. For instance, the TI MSPM0C1104 microcontroller is just 1.38 mm˛ (literally the size of a pepper corn), and a WLCSP-packaged eSIM (like the Infineon OPTIGA Connect) is roughly 1.8 x 1.6 mm and paper-thin. You just upload the gerber files to a service like JLCPCB, and Chinese pick-and-place robots assemble the boards. To the factory, it looks like a standard production run for a smartwatch.

There is one way to find out whether physical modifications have been made to the device.

Make the hardware wallet casing out of transparent plastic. Ledger offers several transparent casing options, but I don't think the plastic is clear enough to allow for a good view of the internal components.

HW manufacturers should further develop this transparent casing concept. It would help minimize the risks associated with modified devices without requiring any intrusion into the internal mechanism.

While I fully agree with this, malicious actors will also gain access to this information, which will allow them to better disguise their forgeries.

Every buyer will face this dilemma: either risk their personal data (exposing themselves to a threat) or risk the contents of their wallet (running the risk of buying a counterfeit).

Shall we look forward to a "surprise" involving this brand?


On the contrary, there is another (old) method. Can transfer a small amount of money to the "potentially counterfeit device" and watch to see if those funds move "on their own". This method is not 100% foolproof, however, as malicious actors might leave small amounts untouched (perhaps due to a minimum transaction threshold) and wait for a more substantial sum to appear.

Securely managing cryptocurrencies requires a wide range of skills, including engineers ones.

One should not forget hardware wallets; however, it is essential to recognize that they don't offer a 100% guarantee of secure storage and to factor this into one's overall security strategy.

What you said is true. Most gamblers rarely take their time to read the terms of conditions when they see the "NoKYC" signage on the homepage of these gambling sites, they usually read through when they're flagged from withdrawing after winning.

That said, while we talk about the lazy habits of many casino users when it comes to reading through T&C's, I think some of these gambling sites intentionally design their sites in a way that'll be misleading from unsuspecting customers. They'll beautify the boldly written "NoKYC" on the main page but will still go on to add conditional KYC triggers in the paragraph 14 of their terms and conditions in their bid to keep it away from an average customer until the need becomes necessary.

I get your points sir but for a normal casino, deposit, playing, and withdrawal are key factors to always look out for as this is all that is needed to rate a casino and to determine if they are trustworthy and except a casino has some hidden agendas, a normal casino isn't supposed to stress its players with these key things.

I understand that, majority of gamblers find it difficult to to read the terms and conditions of a casino before jumping on it that is simply because they believe that the key factors I mentioned earlier aren't supposed to have any issues and concerning the issue of KYC, it will be more understandable if they ask customers for KYC while they're trying to deposit so they can seek ways to pass the KYC and then deposit and the not the other way round where they easily deposit but find it very difficult to withdraw which is always frustrating.

Many skips on it and think they will be fine, since they are just doing their regular thing in the casino.

But the problem is there are lots of hidden information which they need to know. That's why people usually fail to understand what's happening, because they made bad decision not to read the TOS.

Its important and to avoid any issue better not to read it only when they encounter an issue. People should try to make it a habit that once they decide to register on a new casino. Better to read their rules first to understand what they are implementing in their platform.

Many people argue that casinos usually have the same rules, but that's not make any sense, since as I said earlier each of them have hidden information which usually they hide in their TOS.

I agree with you on most people not sparing the time to read the T&C of the casino they use and relying solely on what they see superficially. The reason people do this is the belive that they are playing fairly and wouldn't have problems like multi accounting, using illicit funds and others. Hence, there is the mindset that they may not be required to perform KYC since they play by the rules. But what people fail to understand is that you can play by the rules and still be asked to perform KYC of provide proof of funds and other information. Casinos do this especially when the gambler tends to win often.

Evo i mjesecnog pregleda naseg boarda za mjesec Srpanj, koji dan kasnije nego inace jer sam prakticki cijeli Kolovoz proveo putujuci. Pregled je kao i uvijek napravljen uz pomoc pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Srpanj 2026 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Srpnja 2026

Tijekom Lipnja na nasem boardu je napisano 304 posta, sto je pad od otprilike 10% u odnosu na prethodni mjesec. S obzirom na ljeto i sezonu godisnjih odmora, oo su zapravo odlicne brojke.

---

Analiza merita za Srpanj 2026

Pad aktivnosti nije se osjetio na broju podijeljenih merita u gore navedenm razdoblje. Dapace, broj je narastao i to poprilicno, kao sto se vidi na donjem chartu.




Sto se tice liste onih koji su podijelili te primili merit, nema promjena u donosu na Lipanj: i dalje su na vrhu Pmalek te katanic97.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Srpnja 2026

I za sam kraj, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu tijekom Srpnja, koja je za 4 clana veca nego tijekom Lipnja. Top 3 je ostao identican onom u Lipnju: Daniel91, slackovic te katanic97. Ocekuje se slackovicev odgovor kad se vrati sa mora.

1. Daniel91 [40]
2. slackovic [34]
3. katanic97 [32]
4. Rikafip [31]
5. Pmalek [26]
6. ovcijisir [22]
7. dkbit98 [15]
8. cryptofrka [14]
9. examplens [13]
10. BitGoba [12]
11. SirJohnVonSlotty [11]
12. Trofo [10]
13. GazetaBitcoin [10]
14. Ceemv22 [9]
15. paco92x [7]
16. CroBoy12 [4]
17. VoxelX [3]
18. EXMON [2]
19. icopress [2]
20. Joca97 [1]
21. b1ack [1]
22. DEX.fo_off [1]
23. lastpixellive [1]
24. Billy blanks [1]
25. fghjyujfg [1]
26. ChibbyCS [1]

This is the reason why it is left for the gamblers themselves to read casino terms before going further creating account, and it is very important to also note that very place where they said they could require kyc when necessary, and as a gambler if they aren't that comfortable with such condition then I must say it is that important for them to leave or decline without going further making account on that specific site. Many gambling site that preached to be No-kyc gambling site often end up requesting kyc from gamblers even if is a little winning, they would always suspects all winning to illegal were at last the said gambler must have to undergo kyc before they could be allowed to continue whatever they are doing on the gambling site. And of course you are right, this debate won't gonna lead to anywhere, it is left for the gambler to make their choice of casinos.

Nope, I didn't, and I do know about it (kinda hard to miss when it's right below the thread I mentioned). Also, I only pointed out the proper format when posting scam accusations on that board.
What you showed were the full guidelines, which still point to the same thread I mentioned earlier when referring to proper scam accusation posting format.
Still a useful thread though, especially to those who don't know what they should look for and consider before posting a scam accusation thread.

Slots provided by NoLimit City no longer surprise me when some people hit thousands in one of their games.
Their slot games are known to be highly volatile, which means low-frequency payouts, but when it hits, it rains money. 

None of this is going to change at all. I have seen so many threads on this board where KYC debating has literally become the main topic without any end in sight and it definitely looks like this is the new thread added to that ever increasing list.

Most crypto gambling sites will stick to what they think is best while only few actually listen and change their advertising strategy from 'No KYC' to 'KYC' basically.

Since the majority of casinos market themselves as no KYC casinos, I think it would be best to be open with users in the terms and conqqqqqqqqditions by stating that KYC may be required for highaqqqq aqq. At least this will stop questions from users. I don't have a problem with requesting KYC when casinos perceive any suspicious activity from a user, because gamblers also have their own wrongs too. A lot of qquqqqsers try to outsmart the casino, so if KYC is the only way to prevent suspicious moves, casinos have the right to request it.

Nisam mislio da si ti jedan od krivaca što su isplate bile smanjene. Očito sam krivo shvatio tvoj post jer sam mislio da si upao u kampanju nakon što su se isplate smanjile i da je nakon toga kampanja završila.


To samo dodatno naglašava da kriptovalute uvijek treba čuvati u walletu kojem samo ti znaš privatni ključ. Koliko god neki projekt tvrdio da ne čuva privatne ključeve, ako nisi sam generirao privatni ključ na nekom offline računalu, ne možeš wallet smatrati sigurnim.

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan September 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 111 user (bertambah 4 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty vapourminer Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV SFR10 Lucius Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 decodx BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist ZAINmalik75 YodasRedRocket SirJohnVonSlotty

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty qwk Vod vapourminer mprep philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hybridsole stompix hilariousandco Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 Lucius TryNinja holydarkness tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro decodx BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket Mia Chloe

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana Husna QA roycilik YOSHIE

Sumber: DT update log September 2026

This month 111 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

An interesting start to the story. Now you know the consequences of buying the cheapest device on the market (attackers bank on buyer greed).

By the way, wouldn't it have been easier (and cheaper) to just buy a broken device on the secondary market for the battery? Or perhaps buy the battery separately on a marketplace?

Ledger's website (https://shop.ledger.com/pages/resellers?continent=asia+%26+oceania&country=thailand) lists only one reseller for Thailand. - https://www.lazada.co.th/

You can see it in the picture. Is this exactly where the counterfeit device was purchased?

A wise decision: to turn to someone with greater expertise.

So, it turns out it really is a genuine device (albeit with extra features) after all? After all, if you remove all the modifications, can revert the device to its original (factory) state. Would you want to use one like that?

By the way, implementing all this requires specific technical knowledge. Do you think the "handymen" in Thailand have sufficient knowledge and experience for this?
 
It turns out that the seed-phrase can't be extracted from Ledger (chip), and the device remains secure overall. However, through this simple method (copying the seed-phrase from the screen) the entire security mechanism is rendered useless.

In reality, the implementation of this seed-phrase "interceptor" is quite simple yet highly ingenious. Why try to "crack" a device's protection when can bypass it?

However, devices from currently available models remain vulnerable to this "attack". There is nothing left to do now but open up the hardware wallet before use and check if anything extra has been soldered on, right? Or better yet, buy directly from the manufacturer (provided you aren't worried about personal data leaks).


P.S. Why was this post published here instead of in the hardware wallets section? That would have been the more appropriate place for this topic. I realize it’s all about Joe, but if I hadn’t stumbled upon this thread, I honestly would have missed that post about the fake nano X. I do check hardware wallets section more often, though. Maybe you should post a duplicate there?