Last update: 2025-05-09_Fri_15.00h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Pmalek receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Pmalek
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Pmalek" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 65362554 (unedited backup) (by GxSTxV) (scraped on Fri May 9 15:00:08 CEST 2025) in Betpanda.io Scam:
Assuming, of course, everything that OP has said is true.
Yeah, exactly. If what the OP shared in this topic is the full and only version of the case, and Betpanda is acting based on their provider’s assessment that the player breached a rule, then the OP deserves a clearer explanation or processing his withdrawal. What’s more concerning is the delay in response from them especially considering the casino has a representative active here.
I hve seen the bets the OP shared publicly, and I couldn’t find anything suspicious either. Many people gamble in the same way, and it's a well known gaming league. Hopefully, we hear the other side of the story soon so no one is misjudged especially since Betpanda has maintained a solid reputation and value within our gambling community.
2. Post 65362351 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Fri May 9 13:37:43 CEST 2025) in 🚓 🚨 FixedFloat Scammed Me Too 🚨 🚓:
Unbelievable. On the one hand they give one person a hard time, saying their crypto is dirty and needs to be checked. On the other, they use the same crypto to send it to a different customer who used their exchange.
I assume that after mixing coins through their service, they come out with a low AML score.
This is a big loophole in the AML regulation, and, incredibly, not a single competent authority is dealing with it. The obvious theft of users, almost legalized.
Most of the complaints come to FF, Changenow, and Changelly, it seems, because of their slightly higher trading volume. I believe that the same thing happens with lesser-known exchangers.
3. Post 65362210 (unedited backup) (by Taskford) (scraped on Fri May 9 12:44:37 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
🚩💰What’s your personal ‘crypto red flag’?
I am not at all interested in cryptocurrencies outside of bitcoin and the occasional swap to a stablecoin every now and the. But if I had to mention a red flag it would be no use case and no reason for existence of that particular cryptocurrency. That could be said for many alts. If you can solve the same problem with BTC or an existing coin, then why do we need altcoin X for that use case? The answer is, we don't.
Meme coins will be prime example for that because all of them don't have any use case and usually those tokens is built up by hype. That's why I don't want to engage with those tokens because I don't like the feeling like I have something to chase or follow since you will lose if you don't pay attention around.
That's the reason also I only hold Bitcoins and never think about other alts because it already provide promising future. I always think about meme coins or other altcoins with no use case as waste of capital for us because they are so risky to try and chance to lose is high
4. Post 65360239 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Thu May 8 20:51:37 CEST 2025) in 🚓 🚨 FixedFloat Scammed Me Too 🚨 🚓:
The exchange will then say that the money will be kept until the user does what is asked of them. There was a case not that long ago where an exchange was caught sending confiscated money to a mixer to obscure its history. That shows clear intent that the idea was never to return it to the rightful owner but keep it for themselves. I can't remember which service it was that did that but I think it was @LoyceV who discovered it.
If you're talking about
this case: they mixed the deposit with their own funds, and then send it to what I assume was a customer's address.
5. Post 65360048 (unedited backup) (by albon) (scraped on Thu May 8 19:52:43 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
Where did you get this exact email address from? Can you post a link to the website?
I searched on Google and through Wikipedia, and it appears that the email belongs to the Federal Criminal Police Office of Germany. This is their official website:
https://www.bka.de/I'm not a German citizen, can someone from outside Germany file a report?
One of the phishing websites that monero(.)forex and darketbible point to was suspended - xchange(.)cx
They quickly replaced it with another one - xchange(.)cheap
Thank you for sharing this information. It's good that the domain ending in .cx has been taken down. I'm amazed by the speed at which these scammers create a new phishing domain ending in .cheap.
I will provide the information below:
Domain Name: xchange[.]cheap
Registrar Information : Tucows Domains Inc.
Created: 1/25/2025
Expires: 1/25/2026
Updated: 4/17/2025
Report Abuse:
https://tucowsdomains.com/abuse-form/phishing/
6. Post 65358815 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu May 8 13:30:31 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
Sommer po meni MOTM igrač.
I dobio je MOTM nagradu. Vidio sam negdje sliku da je se slikao na trofejom. Jel se sjećate Onane? Kad su njega M. Unitedu uvalili za nekih €50 mil, tad je Sommer došao za €5 mil. Pogledajte sad gdje je jedan a gdje drugi i koliku važnost imaju u svojim klubovima.
Sto je najgore od svega,Onana uopste nije lose branio kad je igrao u Interu,cak sto vise dosta ih je spasio. U Ajaksu je bio neprikosnoven naravno.Izgleda da je United toliko postao baksuzan da ja ne znam evo ...
Bas je los otkako je otisao tamo,Antony kad je otisao u Betis,preporodio se covek
7. Post 65358675 (unedited backup) (by paco92x) (scraped on Thu May 8 12:47:01 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
I dobio je MOTM nagradu. Vidio sam negdje sliku da je se slikao na trofejom. Jel se sjećate Onane? Kad su njega M. Unitedu uvalili za nekih €50 mil, tad je Sommer došao za €5 mil. Pogledajte sad gdje je jedan a gdje drugi i koliku važnost imaju u svojim klubovima.
Mislio sam da je neko drugi dobio MOTM nagradu, pardon na dezinformaciji. Ma joj taj Onana to je bila trampa kao meni Vargić kad je iz Rijeke otišao u Lazio za tada mislim 1,5 mil eura.
Best deal ever.
Rekao sam ja da Arsenal neće moć meda naparavit protiv PSG-a, Saka opet u ključnim trenutcima ne isporučuje a drugi igrači nisu ta razini da izbore finale Lige prvaka.
8. Post 65358618 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Thu May 8 12:30:13 CEST 2025) in 🚓 🚨 FixedFloat Scammed Me Too 🚨 🚓:
What are Fixed Float (and any other exchanges that are scamming customers) doing with the funds they confiscate? They are not supposed to hold them indefinitely, at some stage they should be returned to the customer. It seems they are selectively scamming customers with the explicit aim to steal their crypto.
Wanna bet that there will be no repercussions for FixedFloat and the same negative media attention that eXch got a few months ago after stolen money was allegedly swapped through their exchange? FixedFloat is a fully regulated and trusted exchange after all.
A service with the utmost respect for KYC and AML procedures that, as we know, work wonders and aren't subjective and arbitrary by any means.
9. Post 65358420 (unedited backup) (by bassabarra) (scraped on Thu May 8 11:08:13 CEST 2025) in Duelbits.com falsely accussing me and wont pay out my 4000$:
This is all, they havn't replied after.
In the discordticket I gave them 48 more hours to respond and solve the issue or simply give me the rule that I would have broken from their TOS.
40 hours left of that, without any reply.
After this I will forward all information to casinoguru, and take further steps.
10. Post 65358270 (unedited backup) (by VoxelX) (scraped on Thu May 8 10:16:25 CEST 2025) in Bitcoin Meter:
Nemam VIP nalog na Bitcoin Meter pa ne mogu da komentarišem jel ovo napisano u prethodnim porukama sve tačno ali isto tako nemam razloga da mislim da nije.
Ono čega se sjećam da ste predviđali je skok BTC-a na $100k, što je sad veoma blizu, a zatimo veliki pad prema $60k. Drugi vaš veliki tip je TRX na $1 ali ne znam u kojem vremenskom periodu. Želim da vidim kako će se ovo odigrati.
We have been mentioning about all our trades also in the telegram group you can just check the history
https://t.me/Bitcoin_MeterThere are many ways to get the vip membership
Either paying for it or getting it for free through few steps
Just pm me and I will explain to you
Contact me through telegram t.me/dr_lionheart
11. Post 65355521 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Wed May 7 14:46:07 CEST 2025) in 🚓 🚨 FixedFloat Scammed Me Too 🚨 🚓:
I don't know how these scumbags from FixedFloat market themselves, but I can guess. Their website and documentation probably boast how they are non-custodial, KYC free, quick, no hidden fees, and absolutely trusted. Did I get it right?
right on the mark, so much for "no need to share your personal details", this honestly pisses me off so much as it's clearly not true and misleading, and i know the majority of people who use their platform won't look past that statement.
Anytime you see something like that, go directly to their T&Cs, Privacy Policy, and other docs they may have. Search for keywords like "KYC", "AML", "identity", "verify", "verification", "document", "ID", "passport", etc. If you can't find these, still read the docs. Look for the context of where those terms are mentioned and you will probably find out that you agree with the service being able to freeze you out of your money and having to submit all sorts of personal information if you want to get it back.
man, only if everyone would start doing this for every website they use.
at least half of the scam accusations on this board would not exist if people actually read the terms first, but unfortunately, most just mindlessly click "i agree" and only complain about the terms when it's too late.
12. Post 65355278 (unedited backup) (by banana33) (scraped on Wed May 7 13:18:07 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
I don't necessarily think of betting as gambling, I mean, it's a game that I need to pay to enjoy. For some bets like sports betting, I always think of it as gambling, but with games like slots I often think of it as playing.
This can be both good and bad, depending on how you approach it. If you look at it as just a game and a fun time but with a clear idea about how much money you will spend on that game, then you might be able to enjoy yourself for a while without going through stress when you don't win. But games can be addictive and make us spend more time having fun than we initially wanted to or more than we can afford to. Digital money on a screen isn't like physical cash in your hands. The experience of spending them isn't the same. With cash, you notice that your stash is smaller and your wallet is lighter. With crypto and digital money, it's just numbers on a screen that don't affect you in the same way. And because you are having fun, you might not be paying attention to what those numbers are displaying.
I think that gambling addiction is a bad thing, I think we all agree on this, but I think that gambling is often a way of letting off steam, but it should only be a pastime and you shouldn't let yourself be influenced, just spend some time with it and don't try to play more than you're willing to lose, I play regularly, but I don't blame myself and I don't let myself be influenced by all those psychedelic lights, I see it as a little pastime of little time
13. Post 65355263 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Wed May 7 13:11:13 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
Za neutralne gledaoce i ljubitelje nogometa je ono sinoć bila vrhunska zabava. Teško da se nešto više može poželjeti. Vodstva jedne ekipe pa preokreti pa nesigurnost. Par minuta te dijeli od pobjede pa primiš izjednačujući gol i onda opet preokret u produžetcima. Ali za istinske navijače i jedne i druge ekipe je ova utakmica uvod u srčani udar.
Obe ekipe su zašlužile da prođu dalje kako su igrale u ovom dvomeču. Da ima neki buzzer da se pritisne da i Inter i Barcelona odu u finale, to je sinoć trebalo biti pritisnuto.
Tacno sam mislio da kad je Barca dala 3. gol da je sve gotovo,jer Inter je izgledao kao da ne moze da se pokrene,kondicija 0 i onda dolazi Acerbi na loptu i salje je u mrezu. Dumfries je odigrao fantasticno,toliko korisnog igraca dugo nisam gledao. Yamal je svaki put prosao i nisu mogli da ga stignu. Jos bi se osvrnuo na Sommera,kako je branio ... Bilo je njegovo vece. Da pritisnuo bih i ja 😄 Da opet gledamo predobru utakmicu
Sta mislite za danas? PSG ili Arsenal? Neutralan sam ali voleo bih da PSG prodje
14. Post 65354889 (unedited backup) (by VashaUdacha777) (scraped on Wed May 7 10:45:43 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
Stvarno utakmica i pol. Radije bi da je Barca prošla ali Inter je odigrao ozbiljnije tekme. Yamal je čudo, ako ga ne ponese budući da ima samo 17 godina bit će jedan od najvećih.
Jos par dana za prijave u BSFL ako je netko zainteresiran. Katanic? A t i ti bi pmalek mogao, već nas ima puno s lokala. Hrvatska superliga?
Yamal je čudo 100%! Ako ga velika lova ne pokvari, kao neke mlade zvijezde) Hrvatska superliga je dobra) Nadam se da ćete tamo pozvati slavensku braću)
15. Post 65354878 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Wed May 7 10:40:55 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
Stvarno utakmica i pol. Radije bi da je Barca prošla ali Inter je odigrao ozbiljnije tekme. Yamal je čudo, ako ga ne ponese budući da ima samo 17 godina bit će jedan od najvećih.
Jos par dana za prijave u BSFL ako je netko zainteresiran. Katanic? A t i ti bi pmalek mogao, već nas ima puno s lokala. Hrvatska superliga?
16. Post 65354015 (unedited backup) (by Bitcoin_Arena) (scraped on Wed May 7 01:34:25 CEST 2025) in 🚓 🚨 FixedFloat Scammed Me Too 🚨 🚓:
Sorry OP. Fixedfloat fell off so hard a while back and is one of the services that should not be trusted anymore. I am not sure how you missed the details, but if you had searched around before, you would have just looked for other much better alternatives.
The service has already been tagged negative here in the forum by DT members
| | Pmalek | | 2025-03-04 | | Reference | | This service can freeze and lock your funds at any time due to arbitrary rules just because they and their partners don't like its history. |
I think they deserve a trust flag as well.
17. Post 65353819 (unedited backup) (by Taskford) (scraped on Wed May 7 00:12:31 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
if you can spend a small amount of time and money win a huge amount of prize and never play again I suppose it could help your mental health.
The thing is, most people don't want to to stop regardless if their first experience was good or bad. If it was good, they want to repeat it, thinking luck was on my side last time, perhaps it will be so again today. If the gambling experience was negative, they will try to recover their previous losses and land on top the second time.
and let's be real, very few people would walk away... once you are caught in that loop, it's really hard to get out of it.
personally i don't know a single person from my gambling circle who actually walked away after winning big or breaking even.
they usually just keep playing hoping to squeeze out more out of their luck until it runs out.
I guess there's two factor on why they decide to continue.
People in that situation still think that they could able to win more especially that they are so lucky today hitting those good profits.
Another one is they are still in climax and enjoying the their gaming session that's the reason they still gamble and don't want to quit.
That situation is risky, but what can we do right? If people that's what makes them happy then its fine. But still see responsible gamblers walk away after winning since they know that luck will fade out soon and don't want the casino take their winnings out from them. I usually do this thinking about quitting especially I win then starting to feel that I already experiencing a long losing streak.
18. Post 65353580 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Tue May 6 22:42:25 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
if you can spend a small amount of time and money win a huge amount of prize and never play again I suppose it could help your mental health.
The thing is, most people don't want to to stop regardless if their first experience was good or bad. If it was good, they want to repeat it, thinking luck was on my side last time, perhaps it will be so again today. If the gambling experience was negative, they will try to recover their previous losses and land on top the second time.
and let's be real, very few people would walk away... once you are caught in that loop, it's really hard to get out of it.
personally i don't know a single person from my gambling circle who actually walked away after winning big or breaking even.
they usually just keep playing hoping to squeeze out more out of their luck until it runs out.
19. Post 65352915 (unedited backup) (by Zadicar) (scraped on Tue May 6 18:53:01 CEST 2025) in Top 3 Welcome Bonuses That Are Actually Worth It (Tested in 2025):
Bonuses without any wagering requirements are for me the most transparent and honest one. I don't judge a casino for having a wagering requirement. It is their business and they choose however they want to run it but as an individual gambler, wagering requirements is an absolute turnoff for me.
Fair or unfair, wagering requirements for bonuses exist almost on all online casinos. You have wagering requirements on your deposits even if you don't claim a welcome bonus. Usually it's 1x of the deposit. Some betting sites allow a 0.5x playthrough before you are allowed to withdraw but I have also seen wagering requirements of 2-3x on sports betting, for example.
Its just the standard when it comes to wagering requirement on which its true that even with the simplest deposit you do have then you do need up to wager 1x most of the time and when it comes to slots then it will be definitely be ranging around 30-60x depending on the platform or casinos. Usually they will be that letting it that small when they do have that promotions but still not that a guarantee that you could be able to get out and just on what most people been saying that these bonuses or promotions are just traps.
20. Post 65351814 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Tue May 6 12:08:49 CEST 2025) in SCAM upozorenja Zbirni topic:
Pa ta Solana je postala sinonim za greške, prekide u radu i meme rug pull-ove. Jedan od razloga što toliki broj ljudi kad čuje kripto pomisli na prevaru.
E vidiš... Upravo zbog toga sam mislio da će cijela mreža propasti lani kad je SOL pao na $8, a problemi se samo nizali. Sjećam se da se mreža nekoliko puta zaustavljala. Ali onda je došla meme-groznica koja je podigla Solanu i cijena je otišla 20x gore.
21. Post 65351579 (unedited backup) (by Hyphen(-)) (scraped on Tue May 6 10:36:19 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
I think it has been updated already that the domain has been suspended since 25/04/2025. The only two active domains are monero(.)forex and exch(.)cd and many reports has been submitted we are expecting the two domains to be suspended soon.
darknetbible was initially suspended but the site is back online. Feel free to check it yourself. There is no reason to speculate.
I just checked the website now; it is back online. Maybe more reports need to be sent for further actions; maybe it will not take long to be suspended since it was taken down before.
22. Post 65351540 (unedited backup) (by Doan9269) (scraped on Tue May 6 10:23:01 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
I am sure we would all like to hear something new from the eXch team as they have been quiet for quite some time now.
Yeah. I observed that too since their last post in this forum was around 10 days ago. @eXch Support need to be a bit more active in this thread by providing updates regularly like before.
You people really are stupid as fuck. They used this thread and campaign for publicity, because they were banned from signature campaigns.
They have since been forced to shut down by law enforcement. You think they are going to keep coming back and paying you trolls to spam for them?
You're too harsh in your words, if they aren't trusted, they wouldn't have been here for the first time, paid everyone accordingly for the success in bringing down the fake domains already taken down, they may shut down, but they are still active with thier campaign from here until the remaining two domains left are also taken down.
23. Post 65351050 (unedited backup) (by Coin-1) (scraped on Tue May 6 05:25:55 CEST 2025) in [ТОП-200] Щедрые пользователи, дающие мериты:
Ниже приведена
помесячная статистика
за апрель 2025 года.
Самые щедрые пользователи, дающие мериты (Апрель 2025 года)
| Имя пользователя | Отправлено меритов | Получено меритов | Щедрость |
| 1) | fillippone | 1095 (в 328 транз. к 136 польз.) | 200 (в 109 транз. от 49 польз.) | 995 (макс. 995) |
| 2) | El duderino_ | 1023 (в 94 транз. к 37 польз.) | 133 (в 67 транз. от 18 польз.) | 956 (макс. 964) |
| 3) | ABCbits | 918 (в 413 транз. к 217 польз.) | 94 (в 48 транз. от 24 польз.) | 871 (макс. 871) |
| 4) | JayJuanGee | 836 (в 821 транз. к 285 польз.) | 166 (в 93 транз. от 39 польз.) | 753 (макс. 753) |
| 5) | LoyceV | 745 (в 100 транз. к 65 польз.) | 154 (в 106 транз. от 43 польз.) | 668 (макс. 669) |
| 6) | vapourminer | 664 (в 411 транз. к 152 польз.) | 101 (в 56 транз. от 19 польз.) | 613 (макс. 613) |
| 7) | xandry | 582 (в 137 транз. к 56 польз.) | 82 (в 46 транз. от 21 польз.) | 541 (макс. 541) |
| 8) | NotATether | 511 (в 63 транз. к 51 польз.) | 254 (в 76 транз. от 41 польз.) | 384 (макс. 386) |
| 9) | klarki | 386 (в 106 транз. к 51 польз.) | 52 (в 35 транз. от 16 польз.) | 360 (макс. 360) |
| 10) | pooya87 | 376 (в 119 транз. к 80 польз.) | 70 (в 46 транз. от 28 польз.) | 341 (макс. 341) |
| 11) | Welsh | 312 (в 22 транз. к 19 польз.) | 11 (в 4 транз. от 3 польз.) | 306 (макс. 308) |
| 12) | EFS | 312 (в 93 транз. к 47 польз.) | 18 (в 17 транз. от 15 польз.) | 303 (макс. 304) |
| 13) | Julien_Olynpic | 283 (в 145 транз. к 51 польз.) | 65 (в 56 транз. от 21 польз.) | 250 (макс. 250) |
| 14) | 1miau | 229 (в 28 транз. к 15 польз.) | 4 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 227 (макс. 228) |
| 15) | d5000 | 258 (в 146 транз. к 81 польз.) | 86 (в 50 транз. от 22 польз.) | 215 (макс. 215) |
| 16) | Igebotz | 211 (в 69 транз. к 45 польз.) | 19 (в 15 транз. от 11 польз.) | 201 (макс. 202) |
| 17) | philipma1957 | 246 (в 100 транз. к 62 польз.) | 140 (в 81 транз. от 35 польз.) | 176 (макс. 176) |
| 18) | Xal0lex | 177 (в 48 транз. к 29 польз.) | 11 (в 6 транз. от 4 польз.) | 171 (макс. 171) |
| 19) | nutildah | 246 (в 105 транз. к 82 польз.) | 162 (в 69 транз. от 42 польз.) | 165 (макс. 166) |
| 20) | LFC_Bitcoin | 209 (в 68 транз. к 28 польз.) | 104 (в 46 транз. от 15 польз.) | 157 (макс. 158) |
| 21) | hugeblack | 158 (в 60 транз. к 48 польз.) | 22 (в 20 транз. от 15 польз.) | 147 (макс. 147) |
| 22) | CryptopreneurBrainboss | 146 (в 87 транз. к 44 польз.) | 22 (в 10 транз. от 10 польз.) | 135 (макс. 135) |
| 23) | bitmover | 172 (в 91 транз. к 52 польз.) | 88 (в 48 транз. от 30 польз.) | 128 (макс. 129) |
| 24) | The Sceptical Chymist | 133 (в 30 транз. к 19 польз.) | 16 (в 7 транз. от 7 польз.) | 125 (макс. 125) |
| 25) | NeuroticFish | 130 (в 62 транз. к 29 польз.) | 20 (в 12 транз. от 7 польз.) | 120 (макс. 120) |
| 26) | The Cryptovator | 116 (в 48 транз. к 40 польз.) | 6 (в 6 транз. от 6 польз.) | 113 (макс. 113) |
| 27) | Pmalek | 160 (в 77 транз. к 39 польз.) | 96 (в 76 транз. от 35 польз.) | 112 (макс. 114) |
| 28) | Buchi-88 | 111 (в 78 транз. к 29 польз.) | 11 (в 6 транз. от 4 польз.) | 105 (макс. 105) |
| 29) | Vispilio | 102 (в 53 транз. к 28 польз.) | 3 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 100 (макс. 100) |
| 30) | dbshck | 92 (в 23 транз. к 23 польз.) | 0 | 92 (макс. 92) |
| 31) | dkbit98 | 112 (в 72 транз. к 38 польз.) | 51 (в 40 транз. от 23 польз.) | 86 (макс. 86) |
| 32) | Halab | 94 (в 37 транз. к 31 польз.) | 27 (в 11 транз. от 8 польз.) | 80 (макс. 80) |
| 33) | Hueristic | 134 (в 107 транз. к 42 польз.) | 115 (в 58 транз. от 20 польз.) | 76 (макс. 78) |
| 34) | Mitchell | 77 (в 17 транз. к 11 польз.) | 5 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 74 (макс. 74) |
| 35) | mikeywith | 100 (в 24 транз. к 14 польз.) | 53 (в 27 транз. от 14 польз.) | 73 (макс. 78) |
| 36) | mprep | 80 (в 7 транз. к 7 польз.) | 23 (в 4 транз. от 4 польз.) | 68 (макс. 68) |
| 37) | MaxMueller | 95 (в 90 транз. к 72 польз.) | 58 (в 31 транз. от 18 польз.) | 66 (макс. 66) |
| 38) | willi9974 | 88 (в 8 транз. к 8 польз.) | 47 (в 13 транз. от 9 польз.) | 64 (макс. 78) |
| 39) | hosemary | 83 (в 38 транз. к 25 польз.) | 44 (в 24 транз. от 17 польз.) | 61 (макс. 61) |
| 40) | mole0815 | 56 (в 46 транз. к 30 польз.) | 9 (в 9 транз. от 5 польз.) | 51 (макс. 52) |
| 41) | babo | 59 (в 59 транз. к 17 польз.) | 45 (в 20 транз. от 7 польз.) | 36 (макс. 46) |
| 42) | S3MKi | 35 (в 1 транз.) | 0 | 35 (макс. 35) |
| 43) | krogothmanhattan | 55 (в 11 транз. к 11 польз.) | 41 (в 14 транз. от 9 польз.) | 34 (макс. 41) |
| 44) | shahzadafzal | 51 (в 51 транз. к 19 польз.) | 35 (в 11 транз. от 7 польз.) | 33 (макс. 34) |
| 45) | mhanbostanci | 41 (в 16 транз. к 14 польз.) | 16 (в 7 транз. от 6 польз.) | 33 (макс. 33) |
| 46) | cAPSLOCK | 83 (в 15 транз. к 13 польз.) | 101 (в 57 транз. от 19 польз.) | 32 (макс. 38) |
| 47) | Synchronice | 36 (в 10 транз. к 8 польз.) | 9 (в 6 транз. от 4 польз.) | 31 (макс. 31) |
| 48) | Jossque | 43 (в 33 транз. к 22 польз.) | 28 (в 16 транз. от 11 польз.) | 29 (макс. 29) |
| 49) | FatFork | 33 (в 24 транз. к 14 польз.) | 7 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 29 (макс. 29) |
| 50) | cygan | 127 (в 33 транз. к 24 польз.) | 196 (в 97 транз. от 42 польз.) | 29 (макс. 30) |
| 51) | Foxpup | 31 (в 10 транз. к 8 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 2 польз.) | 29 (макс. 29) |
| 52) | Rustam Meraj | 29 (в 15 транз. к 7 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 1 польз.) | 27 (макс. 27) |
| 53) | OmegaStarScream | 38 (в 17 транз. к 16 польз.) | 22 (в 13 транз. от 12 польз.) | 27 (макс. 27) |
| 54) | Compromise me | 28 (в 17 транз. к 9 польз.) | 4 (в 4 транз. от 3 польз.) | 26 (макс. 26) |
| 55) | stwenhao | 53 (в 53 транз. к 35 польз.) | 55 (в 22 транз. от 12 польз.) | 25 (макс. 25) |
| 56) | mmgen-py | 28 (в 10 транз. к 6 польз.) | 7 (в 3 транз. от 2 польз.) | 24 (макс. 24) |
| 57) | Hhampuz | 56 (в 15 транз. к 13 польз.) | 66 (в 42 транз. от 32 польз.) | 23 (макс. 29) |
| 58) | Youngrebel | 42 (в 13 транз. к 9 польз.) | 40 (в 14 транз. от 12 польз.) | 22 (макс. 26) |
| 59) | Husna QA | 28 (в 8 транз. к 7 польз.) | 11 (в 7 транз. от 6 польз.) | 22 (макс. 22) |
| 60) | AlcoHoDL | 85 (в 42 транз. к 19 польз.) | 127 (в 56 транз. от 16 польз.) | 21 (макс. 21) |
| 61) | Steamtyme | 21 (в 3 транз. к 3 польз.) | 0 | 21 (макс. 21) |
| 62) | execijutiere | 34 (в 33 транз. к 25 польз.) | 27 (в 27 транз. от 20 польз.) | 20 (макс. 21) |
| 63) | Cyrus | 69 (в 43 транз. к 36 польз.) | 100 (в 29 транз. от 14 польз.) | 19 (макс. 19) |
| 64) | DdmrDdmr | 18 (в 7 транз. к 7 польз.) | 0 | 18 (макс. 18) |
| 65) | SuperBitMan | 31 (в 11 транз. к 8 польз.) | 27 (в 13 транз. от 7 польз.) | 17 (макс. 19) |
| 66) | MK-74 | 26 (в 25 транз. к 19 польз.) | 18 (в 16 транз. от 14 польз.) | 17 (макс. 23) |
| 67) | Farhan99 | 29 (в 17 транз. к 7 польз.) | 25 (в 13 транз. от 9 польз.) | 16 (макс. 16) |
| 68) | Bazzu | 19 (в 15 транз. к 12 польз.) | 6 (в 6 транз. от 6 польз.) | 16 (макс. 16) |
| 69) | Frankolala | 17 (в 6 транз. к 5 польз.) | 1 | 16 (макс. 16) |
| 70) | Cricktor | 56 (в 47 транз. к 35 польз.) | 80 (в 35 транз. от 21 польз.) | 16 (макс. 28) |
| 71) | I_Anime | 24 (в 16 транз. к 13 польз.) | 17 (в 9 транз. от 5 польз.) | 15 (макс. 15) |
| 72) | MrMojoRising26 | 24 (в 6 транз. к 6 польз.) | 17 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 15 (макс. 19) |
| 73) | Balmain | 28 (в 24 транз. к 16 польз.) | 26 (в 15 транз. от 10 польз.) | 15 (макс. 15) |
| 74) | Lucius | 31 (в 30 транз. к 25 польз.) | 31 (в 22 транз. от 13 польз.) | 15 (макс. 18) |
| 75) | Mallampue | 24 (в 24 транз. к 24 польз.) | 20 (в 20 транз. от 20 польз.) | 14 (макс. 14) |
| 76) | ITExpert | 21 (в 14 транз. к 5 польз.) | 14 (в 8 транз. от 6 польз.) | 14 (макс. 14) |
| 77) | minerjones | 15 (в 5 транз. к 4 польз.) | 2 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 14 (макс. 15) |
| 78) | Hazink | 34 (в 15 транз. к 14 польз.) | 42 (в 17 транз. от 12 польз.) | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 79) | Akbarkoe | 20 (в 20 транз. к 20 польз.) | 13 (в 13 транз. от 13 польз.) | 13 (макс. 20) |
| 80) | cryptoWODL | 14 (в 10 транз. к 9 польз.) | 2 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 81) | GazetaBitcoin | 51 (в 27 транз. к 13 польз.) | 76 (в 26 транз. от 10 польз.) | 13 (макс. 19) |
| 82) | Zadicar | 13 (в 11 транз. к 4 польз.) | 0 | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 83) | hisslyness | 42 (в 13 транз. к 9 польз.) | 58 (в 19 транз. от 13 польз.) | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 84) | reefsea | 19 (в 19 транз. к 18 польз.) | 13 (в 13 транз. от 13 польз.) | 12 (макс. 18) |
| 85) | icebar | 12 (в 5 транз. к 4 польз.) | 0 | 12 (макс. 12) |
| 86) | EL MOHA | 12 (в 9 транз. к 6 польз.) | 0 | 12 (макс. 12) |
| 87) | ginsan | 33 (в 33 транз. к 30 польз.) | 41 (в 41 транз. от 32 польз.) | 12 (макс. 14) |
| 88) | Lakai01 | 37 (в 29 транз. к 16 польз.) | 50 (в 37 транз. от 16 польз.) | 12 (макс. 17) |
| 89) | BigBos | 18 (в 18 транз. к 18 польз.) | 13 (в 13 транз. от 12 польз.) | 11 (макс. 13) |
| 90) | apogio | 57 (в 49 транз. к 28 польз.) | 93 (в 45 транз. от 20 польз.) | 10 (макс. 11) |
| 91) | Dickiy | 13 (в 13 транз. к 13 польз.) | 6 (в 6 транз. от 6 польз.) | 10 (макс. 11) |
| 92) | Unknown Op | 17 (в 11 транз. к 5 польз.) | 13 (в 5 транз. от 4 польз.) | 10 (макс. 15) |
| 93) | KiaKia | 22 (в 9 транз. к 7 польз.) | 23 (в 11 транз. от 10 польз.) | 10 (макс. 10) |
| 94) | Cryptogreatdane | 10 (в 1 транз.) | 0 | 10 (макс. 10) |
| 95) | heslo | 10 (в 1 транз.) | 0 | 10 (макс. 10) |
| 96) | Reynaldo | 11 (в 10 транз. к 10 польз.) | 1 | 10 (макс. 10) |
| 97) | lizarder | 19 (в 19 транз. к 18 польз.) | 18 (в 18 транз. от 16 польз.) | 10 (макс. 10) |
| 98) | Unknown01 | 13 (в 13 транз. к 9 польз.) | 5 (в 5 транз. от 4 польз.) | 10 (макс. 11) |
| 99) | gbianchi | 20 (в 1 транз.) | 19 (в 7 транз. от 3 польз.) | 10 (макс. 12) |
| 100) | bitbollo | 30 (в 25 транз. к 21 польз.) | 40 (в 14 транз. от 9 польз.) | 10 (макс. 13) |
| 101) | Proty | 32 (в 14 транз. к 9 польз.) | 45 (в 17 транз. от 10 польз.) | 9 (макс. 21) |
| 102) | CY4NiDE | 9 (в 4 транз. к 3 польз.) | 0 | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 103) | Zigabel | 15 (в 6 транз. к 5 польз.) | 11 (в 5 транз. от 3 польз.) | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 104) | dewez | 14 (в 5 транз. к 5 польз.) | 10 (в 8 транз. от 4 польз.) | 9 (макс. 11) |
| 105) | Hvdv | 19 (в 19 транз. к 15 польз.) | 20 (в 19 транз. от 19 польз.) | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 106) | mamesso | 9 (в 3 транз. к 3 польз.) | 0 | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 107) | hyudien | 15 (в 15 транз. к 15 польз.) | 11 (в 10 транз. от 10 польз.) | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 108) | Saint-loup | 10 (в 9 транз. к 6 польз.) | 1 | 9 (макс. 10) |
| 109) | NurseHub | 8 (в 4 транз. к 4 польз.) | 0 | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 110) | junder | 11 (в 11 транз. к 11 польз.) | 5 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 8 (макс. 11) |
| 111) | Nalain420 | 13 (в 11 транз. к 9 польз.) | 9 (в 6 транз. от 6 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 112) | citb0in | 8 (в 7 транз. к 5 польз.) | 0 | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 113) | 348Judah | 10 (в 4 транз. к 3 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 1 польз.) | 8 (макс. 9) |
| 114) | baeva | 18 (в 11 транз. к 9 польз.) | 20 (в 13 транз. от 6 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 115) | Alex077 | 24 (в 17 транз. к 8 польз.) | 32 (в 15 транз. от 5 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 116) | m2017 | 14 (в 13 транз. к 10 польз.) | 11 (в 9 транз. от 7 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 117) | Lafu | 47 (в 43 транз. к 24 польз.) | 77 (в 20 транз. от 11 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 118) | bigmanik | 7 (в 1 транз.) | 0 | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 119) | Nanga Parbat | 22 (в 13 транз. к 8 польз.) | 30 (в 18 транз. от 8 польз.) | 7 (макс. 10) |
| 120) | Adiljutt156 | 21 (в 12 транз. к 7 польз.) | 27 (в 11 транз. от 7 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 121) | Egii Nna | 12 (в 12 транз. к 5 польз.) | 10 (в 7 транз. от 5 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 122) | Ambatman | 23 (в 20 транз. к 17 польз.) | 32 (в 21 транз. от 17 польз.) | 7 (макс. 12) |
| 123) | Hatchy | 15 (в 12 транз. к 12 польз.) | 16 (в 7 транз. от 7 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 124) | Gallar | 13 (в 13 транз. к 13 польз.) | 11 (в 11 транз. от 9 польз.) | 7 (макс. 9) |
| 125) | Silence Scream | 13 (в 13 транз. к 10 польз.) | 12 (в 12 транз. от 10 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 126) | W Jr. | 10 (в 10 транз. к 9 польз.) | 6 (в 6 транз. от 6 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 127) | ZAINmalik75 | 18 (в 12 транз. к 7 польз.) | 22 (в 14 транз. от 7 польз.) | 7 (макс. 8) |
| 128) | Oshosondy | 8 (в 5 транз. к 5 польз.) | 2 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 129) | kawetsriyanto | 9 (в 9 транз. к 9 польз.) | 4 (в 4 транз. от 4 польз.) | 7 (макс. 8) |
| 130) | Csmiami | 8 (в 3 транз. к 3 польз.) | 1 | 7 (макс. 8) |
| 131) | Ale88 | 25 (в 15 транз. к 5 польз.) | 35 (в 13 транз. от 3 польз.) | 7 (макс. 11) |
| 132) | tusandii | 7 (в 7 транз. к 7 польз.) | 0 | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 133) | Real-Duke | 20 (в 20 транз. к 15 польз.) | 25 (в 20 транз. от 11 польз.) | 7 (макс. 12) |
| 134) | dwyane36 | 12 (в 10 транз. к 7 польз.) | 9 (в 7 транз. от 6 польз.) | 7 (макс. 9) |
| 135) | M47AK16 | 11 (в 7 транз. к 5 польз.) | 10 (в 2 транз. от 1 польз.) | 6 (макс. 6) |
В апреле 2025 года всего отправлено 19663 меритов (в 9878 транз. к 1380 польз.):
- 1% к Newbies: 256 меритов (к 125 польз.)
- 2% к Jr. Members: 312 меритов (к 119 польз.)
- 7% к Members: 1287 меритов (к 186 польз.)
- 7% к Full Members: 1460 меритов (к 128 польз.)
- 12% к Sr. Members: 2354 меритов (к 204 польз.)
- 12% к Hero Members: 2431 меритов (к 261 польз.)
- 59% к Legendaries: 11563 меритов (к 433 польз.)
Общее количество пользователей на 1 мая 2025 года:
- 3091 Legendaries (1784 из них отправляли мериты)
- 3993 Hero Members (1816 из них отправляли мериты)
- 9283 Sr. Members (3321 из них отправляли мериты)
- 18649 Full Members (5898 из них отправляли мериты)
- 33352 Members (10147 из них отправляли мериты)
- 26829 Jr. Members (3152 из них отправляли мериты)
- около трёх миллионов новичков
24. Post 65351038 (unedited backup) (by CCECash) (scraped on Tue May 6 05:13:19 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
However this is No Account exchange.
It is a no account exchange and that's fine. That's the standard way that instant exchanges operate. What I don't think is fine is claiming to be non-custodial and decentralized. CCE.Cash still claims that and it's written in their correspondence here with the community.
The difference between CCECash (semi-custodial exchange) and non-custodial wallets lies in their core functionality, custody model, and user control.
CCECash focuses on cryptocurrency exchange services for asset exchange/trading (e.g. BTC to ETH). Acts as an intermediary to facilitate transactions, but temporarily holds user funds during the transaction. Users must send cryptocurrency to a CCECash address to initiate the exchange. During the processing, CCECash controls the funds. Users rely on CCECash to complete the transaction.
CCECash:..Suitable for users who prioritize speed rather than full self-custody.
CCECash is a temporary custodian for swaps and is more suitable for fast transactions.
Can we stop beating around the bush please and call things the way they are. You went from claiming you are non custodial to calling yourself semi-custodial, and a temporary user-funds-holder. You are custodial. That's it. You and your intermediaries have custody of the coins until they get deposited into user wallets. The users don't have control of their money until the exchange is over. That's how a custodial service operates. It's based on trust. Trust that the custodian will do the right thing and exchange the funds and give up custody of them.
I see no problem in an exchange being custodial as long as they are honest about it. You haven't been honest. You are neither decentralized nor non custodial and the question is how long are you going to claim that you are? You are new on the forum. Be honest with your potential customers to be able to build trust. Personally, I would never try a service that isn't telling me the truth. Everyone else can make up their own minds.
Additionally, if you were non custodial, you and your intermediaries wouldn't be able to freeze coins and request KYC. Your users could simply import their keys into a real non custodial wallet and forget about you and the KYC requirements. But they can't do that because they don't have custody of the coins. You have.
Thank you for your feedback. At CCECash, we value our users’ opinions and are committed to continuous improvement. To ensure clarity,
We recognize that there are misunderstandings and it is our responsibility to ensure that the responsibilities of our platform are communicated transparently. Going forward, we will:
Improve clarity in communication to avoid misunderstandings.
Resolve technical or operational issues promptly to enhance user trust.
Open to criticism and prioritize user concerns during development.
Your support has motivated us to make CCECash a safe and reliable platform for all users. Please continue to share your insights - we are listening, learning, and growing.
Sincerely,
The CCECash Team
OPERATING AROUND THE CLOCK
Contact Us:
Official Email:
support@cce.cashOfficial Website:
https://cce.cash/exchange
25. Post 65351037 (unedited backup) (by Coin-1) (scraped on Tue May 6 05:12:37 CEST 2025) in [ТОП-200] Щедрые пользователи, дающие мериты:
Ниже приведена
помесячная статистика
за март 2025 года.
Самые щедрые пользователи, дающие мериты (Март 2025 года)
| Имя пользователя | Отправлено меритов | Получено меритов | Щедрость |
| 1) | El duderino_ | 1027 (в 95 транз. к 43 польз.) | 161 (в 76 транз. от 26 польз.) | 946 (макс. 949) |
| 2) | LoyceV | 927 (в 136 транз. к 89 польз.) | 200 (в 126 транз. от 53 польз.) | 827 (макс. 828) |
| 3) | JayJuanGee | 836 (в 835 транз. к 287 польз.) | 142 (в 85 транз. от 41 польз.) | 765 (макс. 765) |
| 4) | fillippone | 864 (в 305 транз. к 103 польз.) | 222 (в 129 транз. от 46 польз.) | 753 (макс. 758) |
| 5) | qwk | 751 (в 16 транз. к 16 польз.) | 15 (в 9 транз. от 9 польз.) | 743 (макс. 750) |
| 6) | vapourminer | 619 (в 352 транз. к 144 польз.) | 122 (в 77 транз. от 24 польз.) | 558 (макс. 559) |
| 7) | ABCbits | 503 (в 221 транз. к 105 польз.) | 150 (в 77 транз. от 36 польз.) | 428 (макс. 431) |
| 8) | xandry | 424 (в 115 транз. к 40 польз.) | 65 (в 36 транз. от 16 польз.) | 391 (макс. 393) |
| 9) | klarki | 416 (в 122 транз. к 60 польз.) | 73 (в 37 транз. от 15 польз.) | 379 (макс. 391) |
| 10) | Igebotz | 300 (в 115 транз. к 66 польз.) | 14 (в 12 транз. от 8 польз.) | 293 (макс. 293) |
| 11) | LFC_Bitcoin | 328 (в 109 транз. к 39 польз.) | 170 (в 77 транз. от 30 польз.) | 243 (макс. 243) |
| 12) | EFS | 266 (в 115 транз. к 53 польз.) | 47 (в 28 транз. от 16 польз.) | 242 (макс. 244) |
| 13) | pooya87 | 301 (в 81 транз. к 54 польз.) | 126 (в 58 транз. от 29 польз.) | 238 (макс. 238) |
| 14) | Julien_Olynpic | 260 (в 127 транз. к 54 польз.) | 62 (в 45 транз. от 23 польз.) | 229 (макс. 229) |
| 15) | NeuroticFish | 227 (в 107 транз. к 39 польз.) | 50 (в 36 транз. от 17 польз.) | 202 (макс. 202) |
| 16) | hugeblack | 202 (в 78 транз. к 63 польз.) | 26 (в 21 транз. от 15 польз.) | 189 (макс. 191) |
| 17) | Vispilio | 186 (в 49 транз. к 24 польз.) | 12 (в 4 транз. от 4 польз.) | 180 (макс. 180) |
| 18) | d5000 | 275 (в 163 транз. к 86 польз.) | 189 (в 99 транз. от 46 польз.) | 180 (макс. 182) |
| 19) | Xal0lex | 172 (в 43 транз. к 32 польз.) | 14 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 165 (макс. 165) |
| 20) | Pmalek | 209 (в 101 транз. к 51 польз.) | 97 (в 73 транз. от 29 польз.) | 160 (макс. 160) |
| 21) | The Sceptical Chymist | 154 (в 38 транз. к 30 польз.) | 5 (в 5 транз. от 4 польз.) | 151 (макс. 151) |
| 22) | 1miau | 165 (в 76 транз. к 24 польз.) | 63 (в 7 транз. от 7 польз.) | 133 (макс. 147) |
| 23) | The Cryptovator | 144 (в 31 транз. к 25 польз.) | 32 (в 22 транз. от 21 польз.) | 128 (макс. 130) |
| 24) | CryptopreneurBrainboss | 153 (в 71 транз. к 34 польз.) | 51 (в 13 транз. от 11 польз.) | 127 (макс. 127) |
| 25) | dkbit98 | 148 (в 87 транз. к 43 польз.) | 55 (в 35 транз. от 18 польз.) | 120 (макс. 120) |
| 26) | nutildah | 180 (в 108 транз. к 64 польз.) | 137 (в 74 транз. от 41 польз.) | 111 (макс. 114) |
| 27) | paxmao | 103 (в 20 транз. к 10 польз.) | 1 | 102 (макс. 102) |
| 28) | mikeywith | 140 (в 37 транз. к 19 польз.) | 82 (в 33 транз. от 17 польз.) | 99 (макс. 99) |
| 29) | philipma1957 | 137 (в 67 транз. к 47 польз.) | 95 (в 50 транз. от 26 польз.) | 89 (макс. 89) |
| 30) | TryNinja | 177 (в 99 транз. к 25 польз.) | 198 (в 92 транз. от 39 польз.) | 78 (макс. 79) |
| 31) | Halab | 86 (в 30 транз. к 26 польз.) | 18 (в 6 транз. от 5 польз.) | 77 (макс. 77) |
| 32) | krogothmanhattan | 112 (в 30 транз. к 23 польз.) | 80 (в 25 транз. от 15 польз.) | 72 (макс. 74) |
| 33) | Mitchell | 79 (в 23 транз. к 18 польз.) | 20 (в 11 транз. от 11 польз.) | 69 (макс. 69) |
| 34) | bitmover | 83 (в 55 транз. к 32 польз.) | 32 (в 25 транз. от 13 польз.) | 67 (макс. 67) |
| 35) | CARIBBEAN_TREASURES | 72 (в 13 транз. к 7 польз.) | 35 (в 8 транз. от 4 польз.) | 54 (макс. 55) |
| 36) | mole0815 | 50 (в 50 транз. к 29 польз.) | 6 (в 6 транз. от 5 польз.) | 47 (макс. 47) |
| 37) | babo | 66 (в 62 транз. к 21 польз.) | 40 (в 18 транз. от 8 польз.) | 46 (макс. 46) |
| 38) | cAPSLOCK | 106 (в 17 транз. к 15 польз.) | 122 (в 62 транз. от 23 польз.) | 45 (макс. 60) |
| 39) | mprep | 40 (в 4 транз. к 4 польз.) | 0 | 40 (макс. 40) |
| 40) | Cyrus | 45 (в 16 транз. к 13 польз.) | 12 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 39 (макс. 39) |
| 41) | romero121 | 36 (в 19 транз. к 19 польз.) | 6 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 33 (макс. 34) |
| 42) | Rikafip | 59 (в 55 транз. к 26 польз.) | 58 (в 28 транз. от 20 польз.) | 30 (макс. 33) |
| 43) | DdmrDdmr | 31 (в 13 транз. к 12 польз.) | 2 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 30 (макс. 30) |
| 44) | shahzadafzal | 36 (в 36 транз. к 13 польз.) | 14 (в 3 транз. от 3 польз.) | 29 (макс. 29) |
| 45) | franky1 | 50 (в 1 транз.) | 44 (в 22 транз. от 13 польз.) | 28 (макс. 34) |
| 46) | mhanbostanci | 30 (в 11 транз. к 10 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 2 польз.) | 28 (макс. 28) |
| 47) | KingsDen | 27 (в 12 транз. к 10 польз.) | 4 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 25 (макс. 25) |
| 48) | icopress | 97 (в 89 транз. к 55 польз.) | 144 (в 76 транз. от 43 польз.) | 25 (макс. 40) |
| 49) | theymos | 51 (в 8 транз. к 8 польз.) | 51 (в 17 транз. от 10 польз.) | 25 (макс. 27) |
| 50) | Etranger | 34 (в 16 транз. к 13 польз.) | 19 (в 14 транз. от 10 польз.) | 24 (макс. 25) |
| 51) | Buchi-88 | 56 (в 54 транз. к 20 польз.) | 64 (в 14 транз. от 8 польз.) | 24 (макс. 48) |
| 52) | hosemary | 55 (в 25 транз. к 19 польз.) | 65 (в 32 транз. от 18 польз.) | 22 (макс. 25) |
| 53) | Su-asa | 22 (в 13 транз. к 6 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 3 польз.) | 20 (макс. 21) |
| 54) | Cricktor | 84 (в 66 транз. к 43 польз.) | 127 (в 43 транз. от 22 польз.) | 20 (макс. 41) |
| 55) | FatFork | 22 (в 19 транз. к 10 польз.) | 3 (в 1 транз.) | 20 (макс. 21) |
| 56) | Hueristic | 52 (в 52 транз. к 22 польз.) | 65 (в 32 транз. от 15 польз.) | 19 (макс. 20) |
| 57) | Ronsbit | 25 (в 9 транз. к 6 польз.) | 18 (в 5 транз. от 3 польз.) | 16 (макс. 16) |
| 58) | uche6215 | 17 (в 5 транз. к 4 польз.) | 1 | 16 (макс. 16) |
| 59) | mandown | 26 (в 23 транз. к 19 польз.) | 19 (в 17 транз. от 12 польз.) | 16 (макс. 17) |
| 60) | hisslyness | 28 (в 14 транз. к 10 польз.) | 23 (в 11 транз. от 7 польз.) | 16 (макс. 25) |
| 61) | Sticky Bomb | 31 (в 10 транз. к 7 польз.) | 31 (в 12 транз. от 8 польз.) | 15 (макс. 18) |
| 62) | Ricardo11 | 18 (в 7 транз. к 4 польз.) | 5 (в 4 транз. от 3 польз.) | 15 (макс. 16) |
| 63) | _Hiloveua_ | 15 (в 6 транз. к 5 польз.) | 0 | 15 (макс. 15) |
| 64) | BigBos | 21 (в 21 транз. к 18 польз.) | 12 (в 12 транз. от 12 польз.) | 15 (макс. 15) |
| 65) | Forsyth Jones | 60 (в 40 транз. к 26 польз.) | 89 (в 58 транз. от 24 польз.) | 15 (макс. 17) |
| 66) | @Whale | 24 (в 16 транз. к 13 польз.) | 20 (в 13 транз. от 8 польз.) | 14 (макс. 16) |
| 67) | Bazzu | 14 (в 9 транз. к 7 польз.) | 0 | 14 (макс. 14) |
| 68) | frankbitcoin | 18 (в 9 транз. к 8 польз.) | 8 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 14 (макс. 14) |
| 69) | entertheabyss | 13 (в 2 транз. к 2 польз.) | 0 | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 70) | Hvdv | 17 (в 16 транз. к 12 польз.) | 7 (в 7 транз. от 6 польз.) | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 71) | DaveF | 28 (в 14 транз. к 12 польз.) | 30 (в 18 транз. от 13 польз.) | 13 (макс. 13) |
| 72) | Black Mbaye | 21 (в 21 транз. к 13 польз.) | 17 (в 15 транз. от 13 польз.) | 12 (макс. 13) |
| 73) | AB de Royse777 | 20 (в 5 транз. к 5 польз.) | 15 (в 12 транз. от 12 польз.) | 12 (макс. 12) |
| 74) | Rustam Meraj | 22 (в 11 транз. к 6 польз.) | 21 (в 14 транз. от 5 польз.) | 11 (макс. 12) |
| 75) | AVE5 | 11 (в 4 транз. к 3 польз.) | 0 | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 76) | Promocodeudo | 13 (в 8 транз. к 7 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 1 польз.) | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 77) | Mate2237 | 11 (в 5 транз. к 3 польз.) | 0 | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 78) | Peanutswar | 28 (в 28 транз. к 17 польз.) | 34 (в 17 транз. от 12 польз.) | 11 (макс. 15) |
| 79) | Basti773 | 12 (в 3 транз. к 2 польз.) | 1 | 11 (макс. 12) |
| 80) | Kavelj22 | 14 (в 9 транз. к 9 польз.) | 6 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 81) | Ultegra134 | 18 (в 15 транз. к 10 польз.) | 14 (в 14 транз. от 8 польз.) | 11 (макс. 12) |
| 82) | Zadicar | 12 (в 12 транз. к 5 польз.) | 2 (в 2 транз. от 1 польз.) | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 83) | jakelyson | 11 (в 6 транз. к 3 польз.) | 0 | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 84) | wmaurik | 13 (в 13 транз. к 13 польз.) | 4 (в 4 транз. от 4 польз.) | 11 (макс. 11) |
| 85) | joker_josue | 52 (в 52 транз. к 22 польз.) | 84 (в 59 транз. от 19 польз.) | 10 (макс. 11) |
| 86) | famososMuertos | 27 (в 27 транз. к 18 польз.) | 34 (в 21 транз. от 11 польз.) | 10 (макс. 14) |
| 87) | 1Dq | 10 (в 2 транз. к 2 польз.) | 0 | 10 (макс. 10) |
| 88) | NotFuzzyWarm | 53 (в 36 транз. к 27 польз.) | 85 (в 36 транз. от 17 польз.) | 10 (макс. 16) |
| 89) | GIF-JOBS | 13 (в 6 транз. к 4 польз.) | 8 (в 3 транз. от 2 польз.) | 9 (макс. 12) |
| 90) | Zackz5000 | 12 (в 7 транз. к 7 польз.) | 5 (в 5 транз. от 1 польз.) | 9 (макс. 10) |
| 91) | Ambatman | 37 (в 33 транз. к 28 польз.) | 55 (в 25 транз. от 20 польз.) | 9 (макс. 10) |
| 92) | eXch | 50 (в 4 транз. к 3 польз.) | 82 (в 36 транз. от 19 польз.) | 9 (макс. 23) |
| 93) | Rabata | 14 (в 5 транз. к 5 польз.) | 9 (в 5 транз. от 3 польз.) | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 94) | Mustang Shelby | 22 (в 21 транз. к 14 польз.) | 26 (в 16 транз. от 12 польз.) | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 95) | WanderingPhilospher | 13 (в 5 транз. к 5 польз.) | 8 (в 3 транз. от 3 польз.) | 9 (макс. 9) |
| 96) | logfiles | 24 (в 24 транз. к 17 польз.) | 30 (в 20 транз. от 14 польз.) | 9 (макс. 10) |
| 97) | iv4n | 12 (в 3 транз. к 2 польз.) | 5 (в 5 транз. от 3 польз.) | 9 (макс. 10) |
| 98) | serveria.com | 40 (в 13 транз. к 8 польз.) | 62 (в 15 транз. от 7 польз.) | 9 (макс. 18) |
| 99) | buwaytress | 20 (в 17 транз. к 10 польз.) | 21 (в 14 транз. от 7 польз.) | 9 (макс. 11) |
| 100) | Paredao | 10 (в 2 транз. к 1 польз.) | 1 | 9 (макс. 10) |
| 101) | Hewlet | 10 (в 4 транз. к 2 польз.) | 4 (в 3 транз. от 3 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 102) | Zoomic | 13 (в 4 транз. к 4 польз.) | 10 (в 7 транз. от 7 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 103) | Fuso.hp | 10 (в 4 транз. к 3 польз.) | 4 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 104) | mattsaronx | 8 (в 8 транз. к 8 польз.) | 0 | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 105) | Muba20 | 12 (в 5 транз. к 3 польз.) | 8 (в 4 транз. от 4 польз.) | 8 (макс. 9) |
| 106) | Juse14 | 12 (в 12 транз. к 9 польз.) | 8 (в 8 транз. от 8 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 107) | tiCeR | 10 (в 5 транз. к 5 польз.) | 4 (в 4 транз. от 2 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 108) | Husna QA | 10 (в 3 транз. к 3 польз.) | 4 (в 3 транз. от 2 польз.) | 8 (макс. 10) |
| 109) | shield132 | 9 (в 4 транз. к 4 польз.) | 2 (в 2 транз. от 2 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 110) | Don Pedro Dinero | 24 (в 23 транз. к 15 польз.) | 32 (в 19 транз. от 10 польз.) | 8 (макс. 8) |
| 111) | cande86 | 14 (в 14 транз. к 5 польз.) | 13 (в 9 транз. от 6 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 112) | As-Soon-As | 10 (в 6 транз. к 6 польз.) | 5 (в 4 транз. от 3 польз.) | 7 (макс. 8) |
| 113) | DubemIfedigbo001 | 31 (в 10 транз. к 7 польз.) | 48 (в 32 транз. от 17 польз.) | 7 (макс. 9) |
| 114) | Hatchy | 17 (в 11 транз. к 11 польз.) | 20 (в 11 транз. от 10 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 115) | Lannakosa | 20 (в 17 транз. к 11 польз.) | 26 (в 12 транз. от 8 польз.) | 7 (макс. 8) |
| 116) | Fiatless | 14 (в 6 транз. к 6 польз.) | 13 (в 5 транз. от 4 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 117) | boty | 7 (в 7 транз. к 7 польз.) | 0 | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 118) | Jossque | 52 (в 38 транз. к 25 польз.) | 90 (в 21 транз. от 14 польз.) | 7 (макс. 22) |
| 119) | PrivacyG | 14 (в 7 транз. к 7 польз.) | 13 (в 9 транз. от 9 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 120) | Altryist | 11 (в 10 транз. к 9 польз.) | 7 (в 6 транз. от 6 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 121) | NotATether | 105 (в 18 транз. к 18 польз.) | 196 (в 56 транз. от 36 польз.) | 7 (макс. 68) |
| 122) | FinneysTrueVision | 12 (в 12 транз. к 12 польз.) | 10 (в 8 транз. от 7 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 123) | jokers10 | 24 (в 24 транз. к 15 польз.) | 33 (в 26 транз. от 17 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 124) | rdluffy | 15 (в 15 транз. к 10 польз.) | 16 (в 14 транз. от 8 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 125) | skarais | 8 (в 8 транз. к 7 польз.) | 1 | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 126) | Welsh | 7 (в 2 транз. к 2 польз.) | 0 | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 127) | bitebits | 15 (в 15 транз. к 8 польз.) | 16 (в 5 транз. от 5 польз.) | 7 (макс. 11) |
| 128) | jojo69 | 26 (в 22 транз. к 13 польз.) | 38 (в 15 транз. от 11 польз.) | 7 (макс. 10) |
| 129) | SFR10 | 24 (в 23 транз. к 15 польз.) | 34 (в 22 транз. от 14 польз.) | 7 (макс. 7) |
| 130) | XPB | 6 (в 2 транз. к 2 польз.) | 0 | 6 (макс. 6) |
| 131) | Sonia_123 | 20 (в 7 транз. к 6 польз.) | 28 (в 11 транз. от 4 польз.) | 6 (макс. 6) |
| 132) | Marvelockg | 8 (в 4 транз. к 4 польз.) | 3 (в 3 транз. от 2 польз.) | 6 (макс. 6) |
| 133) | sotelorene | 10 (в 5 транз. к 4 польз.) | 7 (в 4 транз. от 4 польз.) | 6 (макс. 6) |
| 134) | martinex | 6 (в 6 транз. к 6 польз.) | 0 | 6 (макс. 6) |
| 135) | Tamaperdana | 13 (в 13 транз. к 12 польз.) | 14 (в 14 транз. от 11 польз.) | 6 (макс. 7) |
В марте 2025 года всего отправлено 18842 меритов (в 9682 транз. к 1287 польз.):
- 1% к Newbies: 177 меритов (к 107 польз.)
- 2% к Jr. Members: 398 меритов (к 109 польз.)
- 9% к Members: 1679 меритов (к 196 польз.)
- 7% к Full Members: 1336 меритов (к 141 польз.)
- 9% к Sr. Members: 1663 меритов (к 178 польз.)
- 11% к Hero Members: 2132 меритов (к 239 польз.)
- 61% к Legendaries: 11457 меритов (к 406 польз.)
Общее количество пользователей на 1 апреля 2025 года:
- 3086 Legendaries (1779 из них отправляли мериты)
- 3989 Hero Members (1811 из них отправляли мериты)
- 9281 Sr. Members (3317 из них отправляли мериты)
- 18646 Full Members (5892 из них отправляли мериты)
- 33339 Members (10130 из них отправляли мериты)
- 26731 Jr. Members (3151 из них отправляли мериты)
- около трёх миллионов новичков
26. Post 65350923 (unedited backup) (by TerryW) (scraped on Tue May 6 03:41:25 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
I am sure we would all like to hear something new from the eXch team as they have been quiet for quite some time now.
Yeah. I observed that too since their last post in this forum was around 10 days ago. @eXch Support need to be a bit more active in this thread by providing updates regularly like before.
You people reall are stupid as fuck. They used this thread and campaign for publicity, because they were banned from signature campaigns.
They have since been forced to shut down by law enforcement. You think they are going to keep coming back and paying you trolls to spam for them?
Do others agree? Should the new approach be to include complaints to take down the phishing sites xchange(.)cx and stealthex(.)co as well?
These scammers from monero(.)forex and darketblible (intentionally misspelled) will then surely replace them with other phishing domains for the same exchanges.
lol those sites redirect to affiliate links of real sites. Not phishing.
I guess if you were smart, you would not be spending your time begging for a few dollars here in exchange for spamming (mostly false) complaints.
27. Post 65350815 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Tue May 6 01:55:25 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Thank you for clarifying the distinction. Here's a concise breakdown of CCECash based on your description:
Non-Custodial/Semi-Custodial Exchange:
Wrong.
Fully custodial and centralized instant exchange. If you want, you can add
no-account in that explanation.
CCECash operates as a platform where users retain control of their assets during transactions (non-custodial), while the exchange may facilitate trades securely without long-term custody of funds.
Are you using AI for your posts or what/who writes these? CCECash and intermediaries have absolute custody and control of the funds. Users have zero control of the funds during the swap process.
Decentralization:
CCECash is not fully decentralized.
CCECash, like all instant swap platforms, is completely centralized.
The point you have been attacking is that the OP said that they are "decentralized and KYC-free". Your judgment is based on subjective judgment only, and there is no objective factual basis at all. You are jumping around here and picking all kinds of faults.
This exchange is centralized and can ask users to undergo KYC if they want to. Read their terms, it's all explained there. It's not based on my judgement. The terms explain how the KYC process works if it comes to that.
Before picking all kinds of faults, please come up with real evidence yourself, such as you used this service and found that it was not consistent with their propaganda, so that your statement is more true. Don't attack others based on just a little text information!
My statements are true. I don't need to use the exchange for my statements to be true. I will only use a centralized exchange that I believe I can trust. At this point, CCECash doesn't meet these conditions.
If this post is easybit, if they dare to promote their "NO KYC". I will attack them mercilessly like you, because they will conduct KYC verification and have not returned my funds (it has been 7 months). I have all the transaction evidence and screenshots to prove it, instead of attacking here without any basis like you!
If you calmed down and started thinking logically, it would be easier for you to understand what I am talking about. How do you think that easybit took your funds and have been holding them for 7 months? What made that possible? Custody made it possible. When you deposited money into easybit, they gained custody and absolute control of your money. If that wasn't the case, you could have made a transaction any day and moved your coins away from the exchange. But you can't do that, can you? What prevents you from doing it? The answer is again custody. More precisely, the lack of it. You don't hold the keys that would allow you to control your money. easybit does. You are now at their mercy and have to fulfill their requests if you want your money back. Are you starting to understand now?
That's why the custodial vs non-custodial argument is important. You can't claim to be non-custodial if you aren't and expect that people won't correct you. It gives the readers a false sense of security and control.
Any centralized exchange, be it easybit, FixedFloat, Binance, eXch or CCECash, can at any moment freeze your money. Whether or not they will do that is a different question. But they have the means to do it. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be waiting for 7 months for easybit to release your money, would you?
The main reason I argued with you is that you are too pretentious, and you still speak in a pretentious tone until now. Isn't it clear to everyone what you said about "decentralization, NO KYC"? You have to jump out and point it out, treating everyone as idiots, and you are the only smart one?
28. Post 65350492 (unedited backup) (by khaled0111) (scraped on Mon May 5 23:30:07 CEST 2025) in Top 3 Welcome Bonuses That Are Actually Worth It (Tested in 2025):
Please note that by bot, I mean the telegram bot, since this is the only platform I know for now that such tool can be built on.
Got you! Well, there are many gurus on this forum who could easily develop such a tool. You just need to convince them of the benefits of the idea so they got motivated and start working on it.
If you have a little technical knowledge, you can also use ChatGPT to help you write the code for the telegram bot. I don’t believe it would be very complicated.
Generally speaking, welcome bonuses aren't there to give away free money. If that was the case, casinos would be out of business quickly. The rules aren't in your favor and it's made so that the big majority of new players will lose the bonus funds given to them.
Casinos are for-profit businesses and not some kind of sharity and, unfortunately, that what some gamblers fail to understand. They make these offers to attract new customers but they add some rules and requirement to make sure they will always be in profit.
Before claiming any bonus, make sure to read its terms!
29. Post 65350088 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Mon May 5 21:00:26 CEST 2025) in SCAM upozorenja Zbirni topic:
Teško da će neko sa našeg lokala pasti na tako nešto.
A SirJohnVonSlotty ?
Čuo sam da on lako pada na to, i na catfishing scam
Budite oprezni sa većinom shitcoina, npr. s0lana blockchain je opet imao neki ozbiljan skoro katastrofalan bug:
https://decrypt.co/317894/solana-patches-bug-attackers-steal-tokens
30. Post 65349794 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Mon May 5 19:26:37 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
Do others agree? Should the new approach be to include complaints to take down the phishing sites xchange(.)cx and stealthex(.)co as well?
These scammers from monero(.)forex and darketblible (intentionally misspelled) will then surely replace them with other phishing domains for the same exchanges.
It never hurts to report. Now it's time to see who has more patience.
It is to report all the phishing sites that come up. Or the creator of these sites gives up.
In an analysis I did, I suspect that there are about 7 sites associated with this scheme.
At least known we have 3 or 4. So this will take a lot of fighting...
31. Post 65349099 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Mon May 5 16:08:55 CEST 2025) in Novosti:
Secam se da je na toj listi bio i Binance.
Prvo sam se iznenadio otkud oni, a bilo bi malo lose po njihovu reputaciju da se pojavi i Binance kao ucesnik u Bybit nagradnoj kampanji, gde se love coins koje je BB izgubio svojom neozbiljnoscu.
Hm, nisam bas siguran da je to za Binance tocno jer je bitmover prije par tjedana (znavi puno poslije Bybit hacka) slao lovu sa eXch na Binance te nije bilo nikakvih problema.
I have sent funds from eXch straight to binance without any problems just about 2 weeks ago.
Sa Wayback Machine arhive možeš naći sljedeće:
E to je upravo to sto sam vidiona temi. Hvala!
32. Post 65348672 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Mon May 5 13:47:13 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
However this is No Account exchange.
It is a no account exchange and that's fine. That's the standard way that instant exchanges operate. What I don't think is fine is claiming to be non-custodial and decentralized. CCE.Cash still claims that and it's written in their correspondence here with the community.
The difference between CCECash (semi-custodial exchange) and non-custodial wallets lies in their core functionality, custody model, and user control.
CCECash focuses on cryptocurrency exchange services for asset exchange/trading (e.g. BTC to ETH). Acts as an intermediary to facilitate transactions, but temporarily holds user funds during the transaction. Users must send cryptocurrency to a CCECash address to initiate the exchange. During the processing, CCECash controls the funds. Users rely on CCECash to complete the transaction.
CCECash:..Suitable for users who prioritize speed rather than full self-custody.
CCECash is a temporary custodian for swaps and is more suitable for fast transactions.
Can we stop beating around the bush please and call things the way they are. You went from claiming you are non custodial to calling yourself semi-custodial, and a temporary user-funds-holder. You are custodial. That's it. You and your intermediaries have custody of the coins until they get deposited into user wallets. The users don't have control of their money until the exchange is over. That's how a custodial service operates. It's based on trust. Trust that the custodian will do the right thing and exchange the funds and give up custody of them.
I see no problem in an exchange being custodial as long as they are honest about it. You haven't been honest. You are neither decentralized nor non custodial and the question is how long are you going to claim that you are? You are new on the forum. Be honest with your potential customers to be able to build trust. Personally, I would never try a service that isn't telling me the truth. Everyone else can make up their own minds.
Additionally, if you were non custodial, you and your intermediaries wouldn't be able to freeze coins and request KYC. Your users could simply import their keys into a real non custodial wallet and forget about you and the KYC requirements. But they can't do that because they don't have custody of the coins. You have.
You are really funny! Everyone obviously knows what this website is and what it does (there are a lot of similar websites on bestchange). And you are looking for loopholes in this post to show that you know everything. You are like a clown!
33. Post 65348668 (unedited backup) (by CCECash) (scraped on Mon May 5 13:44:50 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
However this is No Account exchange.
It is a no account exchange and that's fine. That's the standard way that instant exchanges operate. What I don't think is fine is claiming to be non-custodial and decentralized. CCE.Cash still claims that and it's written in their correspondence here with the community.
The difference between CCECash (semi-custodial exchange) and non-custodial wallets lies in their core functionality, custody model, and user control.
CCECash focuses on cryptocurrency exchange services for asset exchange/trading (e.g. BTC to ETH). Acts as an intermediary to facilitate transactions, but temporarily holds user funds during the transaction. Users must send cryptocurrency to a CCECash address to initiate the exchange. During the processing, CCECash controls the funds. Users rely on CCECash to complete the transaction.
CCECash:..Suitable for users who prioritize speed rather than full self-custody.
CCECash is a temporary custodian for swaps and is more suitable for fast transactions.
Can we stop beating around the bush please and call things the way they are. You went from claiming you are non custodial to calling yourself semi-custodial, and a temporary user-funds-holder. You are custodial. That's it. You and your intermediaries have custody of the coins until they get deposited into user wallets. The users don't have control of their money until the exchange is over. That's how a custodial service operates. It's based on trust. Trust that the custodian will do the right thing and exchange the funds and give up custody of them.
I see no problem in an exchange being custodial as long as they are honest about it. You haven't been honest. You are neither decentralized nor non custodial and the question is how long are you going to claim that you are? You are new on the forum. Be honest with your potential customers to be able to build trust. Personally, I would never try a service that isn't telling me the truth. Everyone else can make up their own minds.
Additionally, if you were non custodial, you and your intermediaries wouldn't be able to freeze coins and request KYC. Your users could simply import their keys into a real non custodial wallet and forget about you and the KYC requirements. But they can't do that because they don't have custody of the coins. You have.
Thank you for clarifying the distinction. Here's a concise breakdown of CCECash based on your description:
Non-Custodial/Semi-Custodial Exchange:
CCECash operates as a platform where users retain control of their assets during transactions (non-custodial), while the exchange may facilitate trades securely without long-term custody of funds. This hybrid ("semi-custodial") model balances user autonomy with streamlined trading efficiency.
Not a Wallet:
Unlike wallets, which focus on storing private keys and managing crypto holdings, CCECash prioritizes exchange functionality (e.g., trading, liquidity). This distinction emphasizes its role in enabling transactions rather than asset storage.
Minimizing custodial risk reduces exposure to large-scale hacks, aligning with the security advantages of non-custodial systems while maintaining usability.
This model positions CCECash as a flexible, user-responsive platform for traders prioritizing both control and convenience. Let me know if further nuances should be highlighted!
Decentralization:
CCECash is not fully decentralized. While we use decentralized protocols for swaps, aspects like dispute resolution or KYC involve centralized components. We’ll avoid conflating terms like “non-custodial” or “decentralized” unless strictly accurate.
34. Post 65348432 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Mon May 5 12:11:01 CEST 2025) in SCAM upozorenja Zbirni topic:
Teško da će neko sa našeg lokala pasti na tako nešto. Ne znam o kakvoj šemi je riječ. Možda je baš ovo što je btcltcdigger objasnio.
Svakakvih ponuda se moglo vidjeti na ovom forumu pa čak do toga da traže od tebe da na svoje ime otvoriš bankovni račun, PayPal ili nešto slično pa će oni da ti šalju neku lovu, ti od toga kupiš kripto, njima ga vraćaš a dobijaš neki procenat. Ti koji se na to zakače ne razmišljaju da se radi o ukradenom novcu ili ukradenim kreditnim/debitnim karticama i da se sve bilježi na njihovo ime.
Ovo sto je btcltcdigger objasnio nimalo nije naivno,jer ipak daju unapred neku manju svotu novca da se osiguraju i da te pridobiju a onda krecu u realizaciju plana. Ovo sto si rekao za PayPal ili bankovni racun to je bas mnogo,verujem da ljudi nasednu,svasta prevarantima pada na pamet. Zanima me kako je moguce uci u trag takvim ljudima,da li je to uopste moguce jer su anonimni u svakom pogledu
35. Post 65347960 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Mon May 5 09:06:08 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
I am sure we would all like to hear something new from the eXch team as they have been quiet for quite some time now.
Yeah. I observed that too since their last post in this forum was around 10 days ago. @eXch Support need to be a bit more active in this thread by providing updates regularly like before.
36. Post 65347610 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Mon May 5 05:17:55 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I'm quite curious, how are we sure that there's no hidden Clause that could lead to KYC been needed
Maybe a fund coming from a supposed illegal
A user experienced same with GODEX, a sight that claimed that they don't do KYC
By branding his funds as supposedly illicit.
CCE.Cash is not a no-KYC exchange. Please check my older posts in this thread and go through their T&Cs carefully. You could get your funds frozen and the exchange may ask you to undergo identity verification. You have the right to say no and demand your money to be returned to you. Depending on the case, they may or may not do that until you submit the documents they asked for. Only them and the third party they use will determine how "dirty" your crypto is and if you will get a refund or if the coins will be in their custody until you comply. That's not KYC-free, it's not non-custodial and it's not decentralized.
@CCE.CashI am asking OP to explain how it works. If it's non-custodial, I am asking where the keys are to the deposit addresses. If it's decentralized, I am asking how to perform swaps when the website is offline and how to connect P2P to other market participants. According to OP, transactions are conducted directly between two parties. Meaning, I (the buyer) am connected directly to the seller. I want the OP to explain how that connection works if the CCE.Cash service is down?
You know it! You seem to know everything. Have you verified everything you said?
37. Post 65347606 (unedited backup) (by CCECash) (scraped on Mon May 5 05:11:37 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I'm quite curious, how are we sure that there's no hidden Clause that could lead to KYC been needed
Maybe a fund coming from a supposed illegal
A user experienced same with GODEX, a sight that claimed that they don't do KYC
By branding his funds as supposedly illicit.
CCE.Cash is not a no-KYC exchange. Please check my older posts in this thread and go through their T&Cs carefully. You could get your funds frozen and the exchange may ask you to undergo identity verification. You have the right to say no and demand your money to be returned to you. Depending on the case, they may or may not do that until you submit the documents they asked for. Only them and the third party they use will determine how "dirty" your crypto is and if you will get a refund or if the coins will be in their custody until you comply. That's not KYC-free, it's not non-custodial and it's not decentralized.
@CCE.CashI am asking OP to explain how it works. If it's non-custodial, I am asking where the keys are to the deposit addresses. If it's decentralized, I am asking how to perform swaps when the website is offline and how to connect P2P to other market participants. According to OP, transactions are conducted directly between two parties. Meaning, I (the buyer) am connected directly to the seller. I want the OP to explain how that connection works if the CCE.Cash service is down?
Hello, thank you for your question. Please read our official terms carefully. If you have any KYC questions, please contact our official expert email:
support@cce.cashThank you for your support. Thank you
38. Post 65347006 (unedited backup) (by andrew2406) (scraped on Sun May 4 23:34:49 CEST 2025) in ⚠️ ⚠️ Spinbet.com - Unexplained Account Restriction? $49,997.56 Stuck! ⚠️ ⚠️:
Three passports. Thanks for asking.
You don't see that every day but multiple citizenship aren't unusual. Your VPN usage complicates things and makes it difficult for the casino to know where you were at the moment of playing. If the IP logs don't show you played from New Zealand, the casino won't be able to know it. If you were aware that Australia was a banned territory, why access the casino through an Australian VPN server? It's also possible that you only found out about the restriction after the casino told you. The next thing that doesn't go in your favor is you entering an Australian address and submitting an Australian PoA.
I am curious what decision CasinoGuru will make and in whose favor the verdict will be.
Their last response was
Dear andrew2406 and SpinBet Casino,
Thank you both for providing comprehensive information regarding this matter. Given its complexity, I will need some additional time to thoroughly review all the details and formulate Casino Guru's official stance.
As a general principle, we do not consider VPN usage a valid reason for the confiscation of a player's winnings, unless it is used to bypass the casino’s geographical restrictions or to exploit country-specific bonuses unfairly. Based on the information provided so far (particularly the references to Australian IP addresses) it appears the situation may be quite the opposite. It seems the player may have accessed the casino via a VPN routed through a restricted country.
However, if geo-blocking is indeed in place, and the site should be inaccessible from Australia, I’m unclear as to how this access was technically possible.
Dear SpinBet Casino,
I would appreciate your clarification on this point, along with any supporting evidence, such as login logs showing corresponding IP addresses. You are welcome to send this information directly to my email address at
jakub.m@casino.guru.
Thank you for your cooperation.
39. Post 65345835 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Sun May 4 18:53:56 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
<Snip>
It wouldn't hurt to report those phishing websites that monero(.)forex and darknetbible direct users to. That way if they replace them with other links, it's a clear sign that they are only doing that to point people to new phishing sites.
It is and it isn't. Because they can claim that they were also deceived. The process has to be repeated many times, to create suspicion. But in the meantime, they switch to another domain registrar and the investigation starts all over again.
I'm not saying that people shouldn't continue to report, whether or not there is support from eXch. What I'm saying is that the model of these two sites will always make reporting difficult, as it will always be superficial.
We don't need to be discouraged, I think we have already achieved a lot and we have to be proud.
40. Post 65344892 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sun May 4 14:43:37 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
CCE.Cash is not a no-KYC exchange.
Yes, their terms page reflects all details about KYC. However this is No Account exchange. There was this unnoticed error in the signature banner and it has fixed now.
41. Post 65344848 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Sun May 4 14:33:07 CEST 2025) in Novosti:
@Rikafip
Mozes pogledati i ovu
https://cce.cash/exchange deluje mi ok,ima dosta coin-a na raspolaganju,bez registracije i bez kyc-a za sada.
Bez KYC su ako im provjere tvog kripta ne upale neke alarme. Ako im nešto djeluje sumnjivo, novac će ti biti blokiran i tražit će da uradiš KYC. Uslovi Korištenja kažu da ti možeš odbiti i da će ti u tom slučaju vratiti novac nazad. Međutim, nije to uvijek moguće. Ako sumnjaju na ozbiljniji kriminal, mogu ti novac držati sve dok ne uradiš KYC i pošalješ im sve one dokumente što oni i njihovi partneri traže. Ko ti sad može garantovati kako će tvoj kripto koji tamo deponuješ biti tretiran. Zaštitili su se pravilom da mogu ali ne moraju da ti vrate novac. U oba slučaju ne krše svoje uslove korištenja.
I na drugim poljima pišu gluposti. Naveli su da su non-custodial i decentralizirana mjenačnica. Hoću da ih uhvatim u laži jer naravno da nisu ni jedno ni drugo. Sad je pitanje da li lažu kako bi privukli više korisnika ili ne znaju razliku? Ni jedno ni drugo nije dobro. Ako lažu o ovim stvarima, o čemu su još lagali? Ako ne lažu već ne znaju, da li su to onda ljudi kojima treba povjeriti svoj novac?
Slazem se za ovo sto kazes da ne moze niko da garantuje,i slazem se da treba ici samo na proverene menjacnice.E sad, da bi nesto delovalo sumnjivo znaci da to mora da bude novac u bas velikim kolicinama? I ovo sto kazes za ozbiljan kriminal,kakve tu velike transakcije moras da uradis da bi tako posumnjali?
~
Mislim da je jedna od stvari na koje im se pale alarmi ako posumnjaju da su sredstva prosla miksere ili da su dobivena kradom / kriminalom.
Mislim da sam cak na redditu nedavno procitao da se ljudima
stvorio problem nakon sto je mjenjacnica prepoznala da su sredstva prethodno bila na exch, gdje su zbog hacka odjednom sva sredstva koja su prosla kroz tu mjenjacnicu obiljezena kao sumnjiva.
42. Post 65344810 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Sun May 4 14:19:13 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
To try to be more efficient, we have to go after these two domains:
xchange[.]cx
stealthex[.]co
They are the new element of the scheme, and for that they have to be overthrown.
They can easily be replaced with other phishing websites just like they removed the eXch phishing site from there. It's the same group that operates the phishing sites and these 'news sites' driving traffic to them. Plus, they are not the focus of this campaign. The xchange and stealthex teams can deal with that if they see fit. xchange seems more willing to do something.
But it's always like this in phishing schemes, the domain is closed and they open others. It's part of it. Unless you can get clearer proof that the owner of a domain that is just releasing information, with a domain that is phishing, it will be difficult to take it down.
I'll give you a very simple example - perhaps many haven't lived through that time - Torrent sites.
There is nothing wrong with the torrent site itself, most of them just list links to a file (movie, music, book, etc.). The content is not hosted by the site, the site owner, nor does he create any torrent file. Usually it is users who share this torrent of the content you have.
For this simple reason, large companies in the music and film industries have always had great difficulty in shutting down these sites. They have had to resort to various authorities, courts and other means to get them shut down. Even so, they have only managed to shut down a few of the big ones.
And why did they take so long and only manage to go after the big ones? Well, because in reality the torrent site didn't have anything illegal. It just has links, which allow you to obtain data/files that other people have on their computer. In the midst of all this content, there are legal things and "allegedly" illegal things.
Thinking about this example, it's the same in this case. These two domains in particular do something more or less similar. Their content is not illegal, one shares "news" and the other has a set of "tutorials". You will say that they point to links from fake websites. Yes, it is true. But unless it is proven - very clearly and unsettlingly - that both projects are from the same person. It will be difficult to take them down.
Unfortunately, although it may seem obvious to us, these companies have to work with more than the obvious. They have to have irrefutable foundations, and in this area, unfortunately we are unable to provide them. This would only be possible with a clear leak of information, or a more in-depth investigation by the authorities.
I think we already have very little room to maneuver to do what we want. All that's left is to report that these sites are phishing, and VPNs, browsers and the like, do their job of blocking them (which is more or less working). But, there is no clear evidence, the owner of these sites can refute the accusations and everything goes back to normal.
Thinking about this example, it is the same in this case.
43. Post 65344668 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Sun May 4 13:21:55 CEST 2025) in Novosti:
@Rikafip
Mozes pogledati i ovu
https://cce.cash/exchange deluje mi ok,ima dosta coin-a na raspolaganju,bez registracije i bez kyc-a za sada.
Bez KYC su ako im provjere tvog kripta ne upale neke alarme. Ako im nešto djeluje sumnjivo, novac će ti biti blokiran i tražit će da uradiš KYC. Uslovi Korištenja kažu da ti možeš odbiti i da će ti u tom slučaju vratiti novac nazad. Međutim, nije to uvijek moguće. Ako sumnjaju na ozbiljniji kriminal, mogu ti novac držati sve dok ne uradiš KYC i pošalješ im sve one dokumente što oni i njihovi partneri traže. Ko ti sad može garantovati kako će tvoj kripto koji tamo deponuješ biti tretiran. Zaštitili su se pravilom da mogu ali ne moraju da ti vrate novac. U oba slučaju ne krše svoje uslove korištenja.
I na drugim poljima pišu gluposti. Naveli su da su non-custodial i decentralizirana mjenačnica. Hoću da ih uhvatim u laži jer naravno da nisu ni jedno ni drugo. Sad je pitanje da li lažu kako bi privukli više korisnika ili ne znaju razliku? Ni jedno ni drugo nije dobro. Ako lažu o ovim stvarima, o čemu su još lagali? Ako ne lažu već ne znaju, da li su to onda ljudi kojima treba povjeriti svoj novac?
Slazem se za ovo sto kazes da ne moze niko da garantuje,i slazem se da treba ici samo na proverene menjacnice.E sad, da bi nesto delovalo sumnjivo znaci da to mora da bude novac u bas velikim kolicinama? I ovo sto kazes za ozbiljan kriminal,kakve tu velike transakcije moras da uradis da bi tako posumnjali? Nisam znao da tek tako mogu da blokiraju sredstva i zatraze KYC. Svakako otvorene su mi oci i pre nego sto se odlucim vise cu puta proveriti. A ovo sto kazes da, ako ne lazu onda da ne znaju,ne moze biti dobro nikako i naravno da ne bih poverio novac.
44. Post 65344518 (unedited backup) (by andrew2406) (scraped on Sun May 4 12:20:02 CEST 2025) in ⚠️ ⚠️ Spinbet.com - Unexplained Account Restriction? $49,997.56 Stuck! ⚠️ ⚠️:
I never once stated that I have nothing to do with Australia. I have dual-citizen ship for both Australia and New Zealand. I own property in Australia, and live in New Zealand.
This is the first time you mention that you have an Australian citizenship if I am not mistaken. In your Casino Guru thread you said that you think your first identity verification request was denied because you uploaded copies of your UK passport instead of your New Zealand one. How many passports do you have? Two, three, more?
On that very same line you are referencing me uploading my UK passport, in that same sentence, I clearly state I have multi-citizenship.
Three passports. Thanks for asking.
45. Post 65344237 (unedited backup) (by crwth) (scraped on Sun May 4 10:05:01 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
At the moment Bitcoin is attempting to achieve the $100k benchmark, but there is a strong resistance at around $97k+ and really around 96+k which is somewhat still in between bull and corrections point and anything can happen at this point but then, we have more uptrends speculation and the trading volume is pointing to more bull than bear market.
It didn't help bitcoin's momentum that the Arizona governor rejected and vetoed the States' Bitcoin Strategic Reserve bill yesterday. She is leftover from the Biden administration and it was expected she would reject it. Not long after that we saw bitcoin's price go down from $97k to $95k. It's the weekend so the drop was a rather small one. Perhaps we will see more red tomorrow.
I do hope it goes down quite a bit so we can have more chances to buy more before it goes up again. It's always during this weekend that it traps down like this, or some significant crazy move happens.
46. Post 65344199 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sun May 4 09:50:19 CEST 2025) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2025-04-25_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1745549487 1 178336.msg65311697 998490 252510
1745549005 1 5180975.msg65311189 252510 3489845
1745548425 1 5506921.msg64450939 805820 317618
1745548405 1 5506921.msg65312927 805820 317618
1745548224 1 5224503.msg65310740 198573 1825672
1745548212 1 5132720.msg65311926 252510 3613441
1745547623 1 178336.msg65311697 198573 252510
1745547320 1 178336.msg65311165 198573 49008
1745547313 2 5452055.msg65311083 1166480 306213
1745547300 2 5452055.msg65312345 1166480 3120651
1745547268 2 5452055.msg65306656 1166480 1511943
1745547239 2 5452055.msg65303941 1166480 144693
1745547208 2 5452055.msg65303728 1166480 1117066
1745546732 1 5539469.msg65311046 1554927 3532477
1745546441 1 178336.msg65310011 198573 35501
1745546389 1 5487298.msg65309701 198573 317618
1745545347 1 5500380.msg65311953 1166480 3559369
1745545015 1 5253221.msg65306141 837151 877231
1745544663 1 5539301.msg65305343 940323 3490938
1745543334 4 5536986.msg65301932 3490536 3474400
1745542030 1 5539487.msg65312599 3546931 525056
1745541791 1 5484350.msg65312831 140584 3545203
1745541570 1 5487753.msg65311828 252510 3490938
1745541540 2 5518000.msg64733033 3545617 3378267
1745541437 2 5528987.msg65028861 3545617 3378267
1745541322 1 5538306.msg65297504 3520002 3483703
1745541257 1 5539322.msg65307876 3354911 3483703
1745541229 2 5539286.msg65307940 3354911 3483703
1745541047 3 5537243.msg65310772 64507 176777
1745541002 3 178336.msg65311154 64507 1067333
1745540566 1 5539426.msg65309943 3484325 3483703
1745540375 1 5539454.msg65311021 2641992 3483703
1745540322 1 5487753.msg65311651 252510 3529859
1745540228 1 5538672.msg65312363 3465100 3570336
1745540123 3 5536403.msg65297955 1045971 2737799
1745540068 5 5539229.msg65312787 1045971 1052091
1745540043 2 5539229.msg65303381 1045971 3425157
1745540029 5 5539229.msg65310206 1045971 2737799
1745539970 2 5539501.msg65312839 557798 1112094
1745539964 1 5539286.msg65307940 3534752 3483703
1745539909 2 5536470.msg65219864 3491210 3343941
1745539666 2 5132720.msg65165007 3491210 3343941
1745539529 3 5536355.msg65312431 3636671 2679380
1745539474 2 5530202.msg65050555 3343941 3474400
1745539465 2 5534650.msg65312490 3513718 2679380
1745539436 5 5536219.msg65305767 3602121 2679380
1745539300 3 5534650.msg65312490 3628894 2679380
1745539236 1 5539450.msg65311194 972961 65837
1745539142 2 5268108.msg64970992 3519361 3343941
1745538908 1 5539229.msg65309626 1052091 3673791
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (49 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2308 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 25 Apr 2025 04:51:27 AM CEST,
AlcoHoDL (
history) sent 1 Merit to
JayJuanGee (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 25 Apr 2025 04:43:25 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Hazink (
history) for
Re: Merit source observations.
On Fri 25 Apr 2025 04:33:45 AM CEST,
Lafu (
history) sent 1 Merit to
nutildah (
history) for
Old Accounts That Have Likely Been Hacked/Traded.
On Fri 25 Apr 2025 04:33:25 AM CEST,
Lafu (
history) sent 1 Merit to
nutildah (
history) for
Re: Old Accounts That Have Likely Been Hacked/Traded.
On Fri 25 Apr 2025 04:30:24 AM CEST,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
morvillz7z (
history) for
Re: 🏈🏈 The American Football Discussion Thread 🏈🏈.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (522 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 7501 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 752 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3701355:
Cryptocurrency hipsters (
history) earned: 4 Merit.
3701398:
Spinsino.com (
history) earned: 3 Merit.
3701471:
mutclan (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3701604:
onlytwenyone (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3702914:
Regardme (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3696628: SportingFan
3696717: Bluebird1357
3696826: asterlinden
3696875: Jerusalem12
3696971: EdMorgan
3697016: marquelle
3697045: Banoose
3697315: Block888737
3697382: satoricoin
3697402: mr2dark
3697430: TapRooot2021
3697465: RandalJones
3697517: In urgent
3697572: Imptz
3697623: Jostern
3698160: fighter2627
3698167: baginek
3698320: rstake
3698375: Pizza.Day
3698528: HumbleMarketTimer
3698623: julval
3698628: AG0RA
3698688: HugoXOX3
3698699: SunFire Casino
3698904: nonlogs
3699138: Lord drugga
3699331: Distinctly Vague
3699398: Davided80
3699661: x2chilleD4yAx
3699695: u0u
3699802: ninja_007
3699814: Dizzyduzzy
3699847: askii
3699866: MotoLM
3700171: douvy
3700245: MVPoker
3700406: Ethan_Crypto
3700630: NodePhantom
3700798: trendkoyn
3700801: Kedikid76
3700802: Draska
3700819: PortBy
3700842: melinoe
3701054: denyAKA BLACKANGEL
3701152: champloo
3701355: Cryptocurrency hipsters
3701398: Spinsino.com
3701471: mutclan
3701604: onlytwenyone
3702914: Regardme
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:7501
4:0:752
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:18
27:0:4
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:722
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:13935:13207
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2385
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:250
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1330
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:51
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3696628:0:1
3696717:0:1
3696826:0:5
3696875:0:1
3696971:0:4
3697016:0:3
3697045:0:1
3697315:0:1
3697382:0:34
3697402:0:3
3697430:0:4
3697465:0:2
3697517:0:1
3697572:0:3
3697623:0:4
3698160:0:1
3698167:0:1
3698320:0:1
3698375:0:3
3698528:0:1
3698623:0:2
3698628:0:1
3698688:0:22
3698699:0:1
3698904:0:1
3699138:0:1
3699331:0:1
3699398:0:3
3699661:0:3
3699695:5:66
3699802:0:2
3699814:0:1
3699847:6:36
3699866:0:2
3700171:0:6
3700245:0:1
3700406:0:1
3700630:0:2
3700798:0:5
3700801:0:1
3700802:0:1
3700819:0:1
3700842:0:1
3701054:0:1
3701152:2:8
3701355:0:4
3701398:0:3
3701471:0:1
3701604:0:1
3702914:0:1
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 49639Sample 1. 18751 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9935 transactions
2. 18038 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 702 unique users in 9788 transactions
3. 17638 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1043 unique users in 10066 transactions
4. 14021 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 469 unique users in 8125 transactions
5. 13207 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1199 unique users in 4664 transactions
6. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
7. 11138 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 646 unique users in 6386 transactions
8. 11096 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 644 unique users in 7430 transactions
9. 10541 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 569 unique users in 6147 transactions
10. 10339 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 464 unique users in 5836 transactions
11. 10268 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 545 unique users in 4078 transactions
12. 8921 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 480 unique users in 4801 transactions
13. 8679 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 525 unique users in 4924 transactions
14. 8658 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 423 unique users in 4318 transactions
15. 8623 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 315 unique users in 4422 transactions
16. 8369 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 474 unique users in 3940 transactions
17. 8280 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 571 unique users in 4762 transactions
18. 8233 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 589 unique users in 4389 transactions
19. 8157 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 369 unique users in 2956 transactions
20. 8131 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 318 unique users in 2811 transactions
21. 7924 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 432 unique users in 4691 transactions
22. 7704 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 508 unique users in 4182 transactions
23. 7576 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 501 unique users in 3522 transactions
24. 7506 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 537 unique users in 4387 transactions
25. 7501 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 394 unique users in 836 transactions
26. 7500 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 370 unique users in 4162 transactions
27. 7251 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 478 unique users in 4034 transactions
28. 7109 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 375 unique users in 3785 transactions
29. 6964 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 442 unique users in 3883 transactions
30. 6846 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 393 unique users in 3514 transactions
31. 6578 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 552 unique users in 3859 transactions
32. 6328 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 362 unique users in 3201 transactions
33. 6201 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 457 unique users in 3431 transactions
34. 6064 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 614 unique users in 3372 transactions
35. 6021 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 266 unique users in 2768 transactions
36. 5956 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2618 transactions
37. 5944 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 892 unique users in 3864 transactions
38. 5942 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 212 unique users in 1518 transactions
39. 5856 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 442 unique users in 3278 transactions
40. 5751 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 348 unique users in 3176 transactions
41. 5744 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 395 unique users in 3144 transactions
42. 5500 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 502 unique users in 3251 transactions
43. 5487 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 373 unique users in 3191 transactions
44. 5299 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 203 unique users in 3144 transactions
45. 5197 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 183 unique users in 3057 transactions
46. 5073 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 296 unique users in 2320 transactions
47. 4924 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 352 unique users in 2344 transactions
48. 4892 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 189 unique users in 2815 transactions
49. 4881 Merit received by bullrun2020bro (#2744352) from 245 unique users in 2939 transactions
50. 4875 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 212 unique users in 2766 transactions
.......
.......
.......
49590. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49591. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49592. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49593. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49594. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49595. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49596. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49597. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49598. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49599. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49600. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49601. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49602. 1 Merit received by 1440000bytes (#3672090) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49603. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49604. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49605. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49606. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49607. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49608. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49609. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49610. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49611. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49612. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49613. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49614. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49615. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49616. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49617. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49618. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49619. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49620. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49621. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49622. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49623. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49624. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49625. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49626. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49627. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49628. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49629. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49630. 1 Merit received by 0id1d (#3600764) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49631. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49632. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49633. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49634. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49635. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49636. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49637. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49638. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49639. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26109Sample 1. 61779 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 856 unique users in 11568 transactions
2. 59704 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3233 unique users in 16461 transactions
3. 58935 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 1988 unique users in 25116 transactions
4. 51163 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4150 unique users in 30002 transactions
5. 49957 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3318 unique users in 47849 transactions
6. 41769 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9144 transactions
7. 40163 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2658 unique users in 14099 transactions
8. 39318 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3395 unique users in 28117 transactions
9. 36525 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2811 unique users in 29637 transactions
10. 33684 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2385 unique users in 12671 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 30663 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1422 unique users in 10020 transactions
13. 30378 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1525 unique users in 12920 transactions
14. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
15. 25819 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1616 unique users in 6301 transactions
16. 24252 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1202 unique users in 10970 transactions
17. 24059 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1285 unique users in 5837 transactions
18. 23106 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 1836 unique users in 8762 transactions
19. 22398 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1313 unique users in 6437 transactions
20. 18718 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1182 unique users in 8444 transactions
21. 17571 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 599 unique users in 6322 transactions
22. 15485 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1845 unique users in 6260 transactions
23. 15111 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 637 unique users in 5430 transactions
24. 14126 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 705 unique users in 5224 transactions
25. 13935 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 997 unique users in 1598 transactions
26. 13881 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1613 unique users in 6572 transactions
27. 13039 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1216 unique users in 7351 transactions
28. 12654 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1088 unique users in 8006 transactions
29. 12189 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 791 unique users in 4096 transactions
30. 12146 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 639 unique users in 3455 transactions
31. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
32. 11910 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1275 unique users in 5664 transactions
33. 11840 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1403 unique users in 5977 transactions
34. 11813 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2861 unique users in 6448 transactions
35. 11572 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 431 unique users in 5396 transactions
36. 11569 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1442 unique users in 3352 transactions
37. 11510 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1048 unique users in 6889 transactions
38. 11489 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 785 unique users in 5576 transactions
39. 11192 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1254 unique users in 6416 transactions
40. 9477 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 521 unique users in 3782 transactions
41. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
42. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
43. 7911 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 327 unique users in 3244 transactions
44. 7612 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 927 unique users in 4859 transactions
45. 7533 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 911 unique users in 3320 transactions
46. 7324 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 957 unique users in 3178 transactions
47. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
48. 6636 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 543 unique users in 5993 transactions
49. 6510 Merit sent by TMAN (#98986) to 497 unique users in 1422 transactions
50. 6109 Merit sent by mole0815 (#1424178) to 1440 unique users in 5778 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26060. 1 Merit sent by 3btc (#69960) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26061. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26062. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26063. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26064. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26065. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26066. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26067. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26068. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26069. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26070. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26071. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26072. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26073. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26074. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26075. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26076. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26077. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26078. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26079. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26080. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26081. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26082. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26083. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26084. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26085. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26086. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26087. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26088. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26089. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26090. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26091. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26092. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26093. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26094. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26095. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26096. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26097. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26098. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26099. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26100. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26101. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26102. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26103. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26104. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26105. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26106. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26107. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26108. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26109. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 288799 (14.19%)
Tuesday 291090 (14.30%)
Wednesday 291779 (14.34%)
Thursday 311174 (15.29%)
Friday 311949 (15.33%)
Saturday 269783 (13.25%)
Sunday 270008 (13.27%)
Total: 2034582
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
47. Post 65344196 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Sun May 4 09:49:13 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
Both of those work. Additionally, monero(.)forex is back. They got the domains back after some complaints most probably and had people tricked that they aren't doing anything bad and malicious even though they advertise phishing sites.
At least neither darknetbible nor monero(.)forex drive traffic to phishing websites of eXch anymore. For whatever that's worth.
As I said earlier, these two domains will be difficult to take down (despite all our communications alerting the registrars), as their content is not phishing in itself. They may claim that they were also deceived and caught in this scheme.
To try to be more efficient, we have to go after these two domains:
xchange[.]cx
stealthex[.]co
They are the new element of the scheme, and for that they have to be overthrown.
48. Post 65343068 (unedited backup) (by Dyno8050) (scraped on Sun May 4 00:21:55 CEST 2025) in [Duelbits.com]- $71,338.44 Stolen via Predatory Practices & Deceptive Operations:
If you have a gambling problem, seek professional help. Talk to a professional health worker or check yourself in to an institution. Don't look for the next casino to gamble and complain how it didn't go according to plan.
Please take note of this KBJ, I'm actually not ragging on you, legit take the above users advice seriously.
I've never even seen 71.3k in my bank let alone been able to afford to gamble such amounts.
These are "Professional Gambler" types of numbers, and you gambled that?
Idk man, it's hard to feel sympathy for you but, I empathise.
49. Post 65341947 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Sat May 3 19:16:13 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
even if you find some place with wagering requirements that low (10x), in my experience those numbers are misleading as they don't count your wager at 1:1. and if you do the math you will find the real wager needed is much higher than what is advertised.
In my experience, and I might be wrong, most online casinos count wagers on selected slot games at 1:1 when you are playing through your welcome bonus. It's usually other types of games that contribute less to the wagering requirements. Usually, it's table and live dealer games that count anywhere from 5% to 20% or more. It's even common for some casino games to not count at all and not be allowed for wagering your bonus funds.
you are not wrong, that's usually how it works.
slots would count at 1:1, original games with low house edge (1%) would count at 1/5 like on betfury, live dealer games usually don't count at all and sports bets tend to count at a bosted rate of 2x or 3x or they would have lower wager requirements.
but every place has different rules, some have good terms some have shit terms.
It's crazy when they let us play with locked tokens whose price just keeps falling... sooner or later we will try to gamble to get back to a starting point (in dollars):
i used to have that temptation few years ago when my bags dropped in price, not anymore as i lost them all
martingal is so good and bad at the same time, i mean it always works until it doesn't, hehehe.
i wonder how many reds you were away from ruin?
50. Post 65341442 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sat May 3 16:46:31 CEST 2025) in [CFNP]BetFury Crypto Casino, Bitcoin Gambling, Sports Betting Signature Campaign:
We had another great week with this campaign. Week#24 stats:
"Forum
User" "New Posts
on ANN" "Historical
Posts" "Total
Posts"
lovesmayfamilis 1 8,963 37
Ale88 7,589 32
krogothmanhattan 10,446 14
bullrun2024bro 7,368 3
Strongkored 2 13,056 25
Joel_Jantsen 5,629 1
Joca97 12,887 28
Ejarwan
wwzsocki 1 7,688 9
Rruchi man 3 5,512 25
5tift 2,806 11
philipma1957 6 49,255 82
Soonandwaite 6,638 17
tg88 4,951 8
HeRetiK 4,414 3
jokers10 7,922 38
Pmalek 5 16,400 53
Don Pedro Dinero 3 6,862 34
Zwei 5 1,460 39
CryptSafe 4,509 34
btcltcdigger 1 5,859 17
CryptopreneurBrainboss 9,215 23
nutildah 12,766 43
willi9974 12,030 10
Coin-1 3,282 0
Becassine 2,977 14
babygun 3 6,170 11
PrivacyG 1,960 20
BenCodie 2,783 28
bitmover 1 14,813 39
cygan 18,238 53
AHOYBRAUSE 4,541 31
Taskford 6 6,608 32
snipie 1 9,093 22
Buchi-88 13,719 13
crwth 11,214 30
Forsyth Jones 5 2,572 32
alani123 8,348 9
GxSTxV 2,819 14
Princess Leah 546
IceLincoln 266
qurbanshah02 513
jcojci 1,994
katanic97 447
Nothingtodo 1,293
yenerbatmaz 1,137
banana33 319
Mindyspace 157
Mahiyammahi 202
Danydee 6,139 14
43 346,375 948
We were able to create 948 posts. Contribution on the
🎲BetFury.com|♥️ discussion topic was 43. Please check your week details from
the spreadsheet. You will get paid tomorrow with the conversation rate of $96,677.00 BTCUSD.
51. Post 65340503 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat May 3 11:13:19 CEST 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 8131 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 18321:
OgNasty (
Trust: +67 / =3 / -7) (
DT1! (0) 4292 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 30747:
Vod (
Trust: +28 / =2 / -1) (
DT1! (7) 2253 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3599 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 1678 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 2551 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 8679 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 2355 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (4) 7500 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 7506 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 113670:
Mitchell (
Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 1395 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1507 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2079 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 1345 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 1886 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2268 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 11096 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5856 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6021 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 8233 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 346731:
minerjones (
Trust: +135 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 2982 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 3741 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3178 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 10541 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 10339 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4381 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1816 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 3458 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (58) 17638 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 6064 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 7576 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 698159:
Jet Cash (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1979 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 740502:
condoras (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 615 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 1187 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3304 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 413 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1404 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 3328 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1041 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2834 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 5751 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 3688 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 1678 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 1045971:
Igebotz (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 1891 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1901 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 4589 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 14021 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1904 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 2736 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +69 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 10268 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 1164368:
GreatArkansas (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1321 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1179651:
sheenshane (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1151 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1200 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1938 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1836 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1285450:
Agrawas (
Trust: +57 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 579 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 8157 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1339716:
coinlocket$ (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 1509 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6578 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1634314:
shahzadafzal (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (1) 3137 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3240 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1825672:
morvillz7z (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2158 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3098 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2594 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 18038 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2001 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1894120:
madnessteat (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2541 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 2274 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 4924 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1361 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 2143453:
1miau (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 7251 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +25 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2624 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 1807 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3617 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 752 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 2597426:
efialtis (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1503 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1098 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 4824 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 6964 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1528 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2718725:
Lachrymose (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1128 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2722098:
seek3r (
Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2020 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2738899:
FatFork (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2710 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 8369 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1456 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 4881 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5487 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 937 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2525 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 3373825:
paid2 (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3668 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 624 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
7501 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
752 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +31 / =1 / -1) (
13207 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
25 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
141 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
192 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
333 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
19 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 10502:
SgtSpike (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 11275:
wariner (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 11671:
Kluge (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 12089:
piotr_n (
Trust: neutral) (
427 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 12459:
CydeWeys (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 13813:
smooth (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 14001:
MiningBuddy (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. Post 65340301 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 10:01:07 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
It's just a hypothesis and a 'what if' question. The address I shared in my previous post is an actual address that the exchange generated for me where I should deposit my bitcoin if I wanted to do a swap. I am asking OP where would I get the keys to that address.
When you exchanged on EXCH, did they also give you the private key of your deposit address?
eXch has nothing to do with CCE.Cash or this discussion. I know why I am asking the questions I am asking. eXch didn't claim it was a non-custodial and decentralized exchange. CCE.Cash says it is. I am asking OP to explain how it works. If it's non-custodial, I am asking where the keys are to the deposit addresses. If it's decentralized, I am asking how to perform swaps when the website is offline and how to connect P2P to other market participants. According to OP, transactions are conducted directly between two parties. Meaning, I (the buyer) am connected directly to the seller. I want the OP to explain how that connection works if the CCE.Cash service is down?
This is what I asked fixedfloat, and their answer is decentralized trading! According to your understanding of decentralization, do you think they are? They are all exchanges, not centralized or decentralized. So the question you asked the original poster is meaningless, because it is obviously not a decentralized exchange, nor centralized, and all exchanges on the market are just exchanges. Any exchange on the market can say that it is decentralized or centralized, but you don’t think so, because this is an obvious mistake! ! They are just an exchange, there are a lot of them on bestchange!
53. Post 65340281 (unedited backup) (by andrew2406) (scraped on Sat May 3 09:56:38 CEST 2025) in ⚠️ ⚠️ Spinbet.com - Unexplained Account Restriction? $49,997.56 Stuck! ⚠️ ⚠️:
After your initial withdrawal attempt failed in October 2024 and you were asked do undergo KYC, you didn't take any other actions until March 2025. Is that correct? Can I ask why you waited that long?
About the 'Take a Break' mode. You said that it started on 18 March 2025, but you attempted to access and verify your account only on 26 March 2025. What happened between 18-26 March? Why would the 'Take a Break' mode become active at a time when you didn't do anything with your suspended Spinbet account?
The SpinBet representative claims that you registered your account with an Australian address. Is that correct? They also say you uploaded a proof of address from Australia. In your response to them, you said that you incorrectly entered the address. I would like to know how does one incorrectly enter that they are in Australia if they are in New Zealand? Additionally, how did you mistakenly upload a bill as PoA from Australia if you are in New Zealand and you have nothing to do with Australia?
Please note that I am not accusing you of anything. These are just some of the things in the story that I find weird and unusual, assuming you are telling us the truth.
I have no idea why the 'Take a break' mode became active at that time. That is merely the date that the pop-up informed me it was activated. Not by me - by Spinbet.
I never once stated that I have nothing to do with Australia. I have dual-citizen ship for both Australia and New Zealand. I own property in Australia, and live in New Zealand.
54. Post 65339767 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 05:03:01 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
Either you're part of the service team or you just want to spread nonsense. Although your writing style is very similar to OP's, I'll assume good intentions and invite you to re-read OP's comments, as he is an official representative of the platform and confirms that the service is decentralized and doesn't require KYC. I don't know how you compared it to Exch, but be assured that Exch didn't gain credibility overnight and don't attack community members who express their thoughts and honest opinions about the service. I also think it's better to help OP provide answers to community questions if you're convinced about the service rather than attacking those with ideas you don't like.
Don’t you think it’s ridiculous to give the private key of the deposit address? Has EXCH done this?
I am just a spectator, and I have also been defrauded by platforms that require KYC. I have posted about it in scam posts, you can go and have a look. I have no reason to help anyone or not, I just think your attack and difficulty are a bit bullshit, purely commenting and adding experience everywhere
Or have you, the so-called advanced forum users, never used exchange services? I have never seen any exchange service provider on the market that requires the private key to be given to the user. Whether it is EXCH, changenow, fixedfloat, changelly, "easybit that cheated me out of money", or any exchange provider on bestchange
55. Post 65339758 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 04:57:25 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
Either you're part of the service team or you just want to spread nonsense. Although your writing style is very similar to OP's, I'll assume good intentions and invite you to re-read OP's comments, as he is an official representative of the platform and confirms that the service is decentralized and doesn't require KYC. I don't know how you compared it to Exch, but be assured that Exch didn't gain credibility overnight and don't attack community members who express their thoughts and honest opinions about the service. I also think it's better to help OP provide answers to community questions if you're convinced about the service rather than attacking those with ideas you don't like.
Don’t you think it’s ridiculous to give the private key of the deposit address? Has EXCH done this?
I am just a spectator, and I have also been defrauded by platforms that require KYC. I have posted about it in scam posts, you can go and have a look. I have no reason to help anyone or not, I just think your attack and difficulty are a bit bullshit, purely commenting and adding experience everywhere
56. Post 65339709 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Sat May 3 04:18:01 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
Either you're part of the service team or you just want to spread nonsense. Although your writing style is very similar to OP's, I'll assume good intentions and invite you to re-read OP's comments, as he is an official representative of the platform and confirms that the service is decentralized and doesn't require KYC. I don't know how you compared it to Exch, but be assured that Exch didn't gain credibility overnight and don't attack community members who express their thoughts and honest opinions about the service. I also think it's better to help OP provide answers to community questions if you're convinced about the service rather than attacking those with ideas you don't like.
57. Post 65339653 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 03:13:31 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
58. Post 65339635 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 02:55:07 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
<Snip>
Tell us this please. Let's say I want to exchange bitcoin for ether. I fill out the form on your website and I am given bc1qd28307q3p52zzcnu8lx7eg0lwkzwntq9flmcwh as the deposit address for my bitcoin. Can you tell me how do I find the private key or seed of this address if I need it?
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Do you mean that after you deposit money, you still need the private key of this address, and then you need others to send you the coins you exchanged? Please tell me where there is a website that does this kind of good thing, so I can go there too.
When you exchanged on EXCH, did they also give you the private key of your deposit address?
59. Post 65338733 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Fri May 2 21:13:07 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
You seem to know enough about situations like this. Perhaps you can answer the following question. Is there any way we can take advantage of this situation and get in touch with ICANN to complain to them directly and ask them to take action, proving they are dealing with a malicious site and site owner?
Not the expert here but I think considering monero . Forex are now on the watchlist of ICANN, I think it makes logical sense to now report the registrar now for failing to follow up the abuse (phishing) which they haven't done anything about it.
Did my part , others can report the registrar there too.
https://icannportal.force.com/compliance/s/abuse-contactI think this is a bit of an exaggeration. Because part of the crook's scheme was that when he started to be investigated by the registrar company, he would change companies. Soon the company would no longer have autonomy over the domain, and the other company would become responsible.
In this case, the new company ends up having control of the domain for a short time, and therefore ends up not having a minimally viable margin of maneuver to take action.
There are some deadlines that must be met between domain transfers, which can create delays in analysis and little capacity for intervention. Therefore, I say that it makes no sense to keep accusing the Registrar. Perhaps the previous one could suffer this type of accusation, but it can also claim that when it started investigating, the domain transfer process began.
In this case and at this time, I don't think it makes sense to go that route. We must pay attention, so as not to be too "inconvenient" (individually speaking) we may lose weight in future cases.
60. Post 65338710 (unedited backup) (by Woodie) (scraped on Fri May 2 21:03:49 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
You seem to know enough about situations like this. Perhaps you can answer the following question. Is there any way we can take advantage of this situation and get in touch with ICANN to complain to them directly and ask them to take action, proving they are dealing with a malicious site and site owner?
Not the expert here but I think considering monero . Forex are now on the watchlist of ICAN, I think it makes logical sense to now report the registrar now for failing to follow up the abuse (phishing) which they haven't done anything about it.
Did my part , others can report the registrar there too.
https://icannportal.force.com/compliance/s/abuse-contact
61. Post 65338429 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Fri May 2 19:32:25 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
You seem to know enough about situations like this. Perhaps you can answer the following question. Is there any way we can take advantage of this situation and get in touch with ICANN to complain to them directly and ask them to take action, proving they are dealing with a malicious site and site owner?
Usually they do not intervene in these cases. Unless it is really something very big and that involves the competent authorities.
That is why there are registration companies, to manage and control what is done with the domains.
But, there is no problem sending an email.
You are being paid to launch false complaints and harass the hosts, registrars, and owners of news sites and blogs that reported on eXch laundering money for the Lazurus NK hacking group. Conflating news blogs like monero [.] forex with clone/phishing sites like exch [.] cd may confuse low level staffers at web hosts, but not law enforcement.
If this so-called monero(.)Forex has nothing to do with these phishing sites... Why was you using the DNS service of one of these phishing sites? Can you give me a logical explanation for why this happened?
https://whoisfreaks.com/tools/whois/history/lookup/monero.forex
62. Post 65338371 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Fri May 2 19:09:32 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] eXch Anti-Phishing Campaign:
Clever scammers! I wouldn't bother reporting to nicenic.net because they are pretty infamous for hosting scam sites and you can find a lot more information about that through their trustpilot rating.
At this point, it's better to simply get monero.forex and darknetbible.info blacklisted just like exch.cd since their registrars will protect them.
63. Post 65338306 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Fri May 2 18:50:55 CEST 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
But I think to redeem bonus 40x wager is way too much as a starter , keep it to 5/10x and an option to withdraw profit will likely great for user's.
You won't have much luck finding crypto casinos with wagering requirements of 5 to 10x. The standard is 30x to 40x. Some are below that, like 20-25x but I have also seen online casinos requiring playthroughs of 60-80x and more.
even if you find some place with wagering requirements that low (10x), in my experience those numbers are misleading as they don't count your wager at 1:1. and if you do the math you will find the real wager needed is much higher than what is advertised.
64. Post 65338222 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Fri May 2 18:24:01 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
