Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:53:27 AM

My opinion is that if people can find a way to abuse the system to make more faucet claims, they will. It's an ugly human nature.
What would be the requirement to make claims on your website? Would someone just need to spend time on it and browse around or are you planning to have them read your content, answer questions, and actually show some knowledge before they can earn bitcoin?

Yes the plan is to make about 100+ question Quiz/learning funnel before user is able to claim e.g how many decimal are behind 0.? answer a) 5 b) 7 c) 8
If correct to reward user , next question how many bitcoins are total a)10M b)21M c) 24M
and so on, I know some will use Chatgpt or search but the point is that they will learn and adopt how bitcoin works
and after the whole questions are done e.g 7-14 days he will be able to get reward just by solving the captcha

While on other side the people who want to advertise their crypto project will have to pay so i can keep the faucet alive

Quote from: Pmalek on October 13, 2025, 03:30:07 PM

Quote from: Satofan44 on October 13, 2025, 03:13:51 PM

It is a myth. It is never going to happen. This possibility is often used by shitcoiners who advocate for POS. A 51% attack in POS is much more realistic as it does not have any physical limitations. Stake is abstract, real world power is not. A 51% attack in a POS protocol takes complete control over the blockchain. A 51% attack in a POW protocol is a kamikaze level move that will make all miners obsolete. Temporary chaos, but you can't take control over Bitcoin this way.

I am not sure what exactly happened to Monero back in August. Some claim that there was a 51% attack against the blockchain that resulted in chain reorgs, but then the numbers also differ in the scope. Some say it was 6 blocks, other that more than 50 blocks got orphaned. One side is denying that any pool controlled more than 50% of the global hashrate, but the pool that allegedly did say they were successful. I haven't followed the story so I don't know if other miners were unable to mine blocks during the alleged attack or not and if there were significant doublespends.

FYI 51% attack on Monero is FUD. BitMEX mentioned the actual hashrate was 33% or lower[1] while analysis from blockchain developer shows the actual hashrate was 35% or lower[2]. As stated on my previous post, it's possible to try re-org block with less than 51% hashrate. But the chance of success would be lower depending on hashrate percentage and block depth[3].

Quote from: Pmalek on October 13, 2025, 03:30:07 PM

Anyways, my point is that a popular PoW coin suffered or were at least close to suffering a 51% attack against its blockchain. Bitcoin is, of course, a different kind of beast from Monero, but still.

Yeah, it's something i can agree. It's valuable lesson for community/developer of PoW coins.

[1] https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1955254320305217726
[2] https://shai-deshe.gitbook.io/parallel-thoughts/proof-of-work/the-qubic-minority-report
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5561948.msg65907455#msg65907455

Quote from: Youngrebel on Today at 09:02:31 PM

Quote from: TravelMug on Today at 07:41:35 PM

Quote from: noormcs5 on Today at 03:48:52 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:37:47 PM

You make it sound like crypto deposits are a luxury and cost significant amounts of money. Let's take bitcoin that has traditionally cost a bit more to move than smaller, especially POS coins, as an example. For $0.10 or $0.20 per transaction, regardless of the amount of BTC you send, you can make a transaction from a non-custodial wallet. Other cryptocurrencies that prioritize low fees and quick confirmations cost 1 cent and less.

Even if someone deposits litecoin or dogecoin in the gambling sites whose transaction fees are close to a very small amount, it is indeed a headache to transfer such small amount again and again to the gambling site and then gamble.

For example if I gamble with 0.5$ in a single game so it doesn't make sense for me to deposit 0.5$ dollar only and then try to play and if I lose all that amount and then transfer another 0.5$. What I will do, I will manage my risk like I will deposit $10 or $20 at a time and then play with it and also it will be like I will have a relax of mind and will not be like you know the hassle of only depositing and depositing small amounts.

I just don't know if there are gamblers that are going to deposit $0.5 to play?

For me the minimum is like $20.00 or higher, that kind of gambling money is not that big to begin with and so it's a good amount already. So I doubt that the picture you describe are being used by gamblers at some point.

It could be but in land base, but in online, $0.5 is not viable just to be honest.

I have not seen any casino accepting such amount as a deposit amount and what I have seen is $1 and not $0.5. From where will you even send that amount. Because wallets have a limit to withdraw and it will not be 0.5$. some casinos which I had participated, take a minimum deposit of $5, $10 and it is only in the fiat deposit that I have deposited less amount which is below $1 as of then but now it is more than $1 because of the devaluation of the local currency.

I think that is just an example.

But if people can do that I think none of us would come in the casino and deposit $0.5 since it cannot do anything to us, people won't find any enjoyment in that figure.

What I see here is most of people deposit $10 to $20 then place $0.1 - $0.2 minimum bets then try to enjoy those games what they play.

But at the end of the day its up for people whatever strategy or the amount they used suits their preferences, since each of us have different level of enjoyment.

Quote from: TravelMug on Today at 07:41:35 PM

Quote from: noormcs5 on Today at 03:48:52 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:37:47 PM

You make it sound like crypto deposits are a luxury and cost significant amounts of money. Let's take bitcoin that has traditionally cost a bit more to move than smaller, especially POS coins, as an example. For $0.10 or $0.20 per transaction, regardless of the amount of BTC you send, you can make a transaction from a non-custodial wallet. Other cryptocurrencies that prioritize low fees and quick confirmations cost 1 cent and less.

Even if someone deposits litecoin or dogecoin in the gambling sites whose transaction fees are close to a very small amount, it is indeed a headache to transfer such small amount again and again to the gambling site and then gamble.

For example if I gamble with 0.5$ in a single game so it doesn't make sense for me to deposit 0.5$ dollar only and then try to play and if I lose all that amount and then transfer another 0.5$. What I will do, I will manage my risk like I will deposit $10 or $20 at a time and then play with it and also it will be like I will have a relax of mind and will not be like you know the hassle of only depositing and depositing small amounts.

I just don't know if there are gamblers that are going to deposit $0.5 to play?

For me the minimum is like $20.00 or higher, that kind of gambling money is not that big to begin with and so it's a good amount already. So I doubt that the picture you describe are being used by gamblers at some point.

It could be but in land base, but in online, $0.5 is not viable just to be honest.

I have not seen any casino accepting such amount as a deposit amount and what I have seen is $1 and not $0.5. From where will you even send that amount. Because wallets have a limit to withdraw and it will not be 0.5$. some casinos which I had participated, take a minimum deposit of $5, $10 and it is only in the fiat deposit that I have deposited less amount which is below $1 as of then but now it is more than $1 because of the devaluation of the local currency.

Quote from: noormcs5 on Today at 03:48:52 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:37:47 PM

Quote from: DiMarxist on Today at 12:12:44 PM

It is not really good to deposite the amount you want to gamble with in one time and deposit another in another time again because each transaction you make, there is a transaction fee you are paying so it would be good to deposit once and gamble any amount with it at a time and if any balance is leftover, he might use it later in the week or that day. That should be the mood of the gambler of the day in the casino, if he wants to empty or reserve.

You make it sound like crypto deposits are a luxury and cost significant amounts of money. Let's take bitcoin that has traditionally cost a bit more to move than smaller, especially POS coins, as an example. For $0.10 or $0.20 per transaction, regardless of the amount of BTC you send, you can make a transaction from a non-custodial wallet. Other cryptocurrencies that prioritize low fees and quick confirmations cost 1 cent and less.

Even if someone deposits litecoin or dogecoin in the gambling sites whose transaction fees are close to a very small amount, it is indeed a headache to transfer such small amount again and again to the gambling site and then gamble.

For example if I gamble with 0.5$ in a single game so it doesn't make sense for me to deposit 0.5$ dollar only and then try to play and if I lose all that amount and then transfer another 0.5$. What I will do, I will manage my risk like I will deposit $10 or $20 at a time and then play with it and also it will be like I will have a relax of mind and will not be like you know the hassle of only depositing and depositing small amounts.

I just don't know if there are gamblers that are going to deposit $0.5 to play?

For me the minimum is like $20.00 or higher, that kind of gambling money is not that big to begin with and so it's a good amount already. So I doubt that the picture you describe are being used by gamblers at some point.

It could be but in land base, but in online, $0.5 is not viable just to be honest.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:37:47 PM

Quote from: DiMarxist on Today at 12:12:44 PM

It is not really good to deposite the amount you want to gamble with in one time and deposit another in another time again because each transaction you make, there is a transaction fee you are paying so it would be good to deposit once and gamble any amount with it at a time and if any balance is leftover, he might use it later in the week or that day. That should be the mood of the gambler of the day in the casino, if he wants to empty or reserve.

You make it sound like crypto deposits are a luxury and cost significant amounts of money. Let's take bitcoin that has traditionally cost a bit more to move than smaller, especially POS coins, as an example. For $0.10 or $0.20 per transaction, regardless of the amount of BTC you send, you can make a transaction from a non-custodial wallet. Other cryptocurrencies that prioritize low fees and quick confirmations cost 1 cent and less.

Even if someone deposits litecoin or dogecoin in the gambling sites whose transaction fees are close to a very small amount, it is indeed a headache to transfer such small amount again and again to the gambling site and then gamble.

For example if I gamble with 0.5$ in a single game so it doesn't make sense for me to deposit 5 dollar only and then try to play and if I lose all that amount and then transfer another 0.5$. What I will do, I will manage my risk like I will deposit $10 or $20 at a time and then play with it and also it will be I will have a relax of mind and will not be like you know the hassle of only depositing and depositing small amounts.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:30:07 PM

Quote from: Satofan44 on Today at 03:13:51 PM

It is a myth. It is never going to happen. This possibility is often used by shitcoiners who advocate for POS. A 51% attack in POS is much more realistic as it does not have any physical limitations. Stake is abstract, real world power is not. A 51% attack in a POS protocol takes complete control over the blockchain. A 51% attack in a POW protocol is a kamikaze level move that will make all miners obsolete. Temporary chaos, but you can't take control over Bitcoin this way.

I am not sure what exactly happened to Monero back in August. Some claim that there was a 51% attack against the blockchain that resulted in chain reorgs, but then the numbers also differ in the scope. Some say it was 6 blocks, other that more than 50 blocks got orphaned. One side is denying that any pool controlled more than 50% of the global hashrate, but the pool that allegedly did say they were successful. I haven't followed the story so I don't know if other miners were unable to mine blocks during the alleged attack or not and if there were significant doublespends.

Anyways, my point is that a popular PoW coin suffered or were at least close to suffering a 51% attack against its blockchain. Bitcoin is, of course, a different kind of beast from Monero, but still.

It is likely that a small attack was possible but it is unknown if it was successful, but you must understand one important difference. Having 51% hashrate =/= executing a 51% attack. Those are different things. For there to be a 51% attack the group that owns the 51% hashrate must execute at least 1 double spend against somebody. Orphaning blocks is not a sign of a succesful 51% attack, there are other reasons for which this can happen such as selfish mining. AFAIK there is no proof that a 51% attack was successfully done against somebody or some entity. Doing it between your own wallets or your colleagues does not count. It has to be a market transaction of some short. In any case this is not legal, you can't with intent steal an asset or coin from somebody else especially not from established and large businesses such as Binance. I would expect a public entity that tries to do this to get quickly handled by the law. An anonymous attacker could get away with it but hiding all that hashrate (even if most of it is rented) is very difficult.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:30:07 PM

Anyways, my point is that a popular PoW coin suffered or were at least close to suffering a 51% attack against its blockchain. Bitcoin is, of course, a different kind of beast from Monero, but still.

Yes, that is why I wrote this in the second part of my post. In theory it is possible. For Bitcoin, in practice it is very unlikely. We have much bigger threats to worry about than this theoretical attack.

Quote from: Satofan44 on Today at 03:13:51 PM

Of course it is possible in shitcoins. In terms of actual power expenditure, i.e., the actual security of a blockchain the dominance of Bitcoin is something like 99.9%. Coingecko would never show you that number though. Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:53:46 AM

The winner of the 50 SOL draw will be announced on 14 Oct at 00:00. Solana is down 15% on the weekly chart following the crypto meltdown we witnessed on Friday night but it's an excellent prize.
https://metawin.com/prizes/31284/

Market is recovering and people win that 50 SOL will be so lucky to get huge rewards from this competition. Few hours left and we could see another new lucky people wins huge from Metawin.

Quote from: Mahdirakib on Today at 11:07:32 AM

Quote from: Potato Chips on October 12, 2025, 07:55:47 AM

🔵 Get up to $200 by playing plinko
~snip~
Make sure to check the full deets 👇
https://metawin.com/promotions/plinko-tiered/

It was a great promotion from the MetaWin team. And I was pretty interested to wager $10k and claim all those codes. But I had some doubts about the requirement when I checked the bonus codes. I had reached to the support to clear my doubts. The funny part is that I got a response from their support team today, they took 17+ hours to give a reply to my inquiry. However, I wasn't eligible for this promo as the minimum VIP rank needed to be Bronze to be eligible for that.

Indeed this is another great promotion done by their team. They always have those things that can excite their community and for sure that lots of people would enjoy this especially that we have chance to get up to $200 by playing their Plinko.

This is great promotion for people who regularly play that game.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 12, 2025, 07:10:10 AM

Even if a casino doesn't have an official bug bounty program, the owners can still show gratitude to a person who discovers a serious issue and reports it responsibly. It's the right thing to do. White hats should be rewarded, and people must see that it pays off to do the ethical thing instead of abusing vulnerabilities and trying to fill your pockets as much as you can.

If only those who steal and abuse get richer but honest individuals get a 'thanks and goodbye', you are only pushing people in the wrong direction.

Absolutely right, the company�in our case, the online casino�is interested in improving and closing security holes. And while they may not advertise their rewards program on their website, like Apple, for example, they still don't want anyone exploiting their system by stealing money earned dishonestly. But I'm sure most players won't help me anyway and will think they've found a gold mine.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:22:50 AM

I don't know anything about Bitcoin Knotz, but if I wanted to run a full node, I am not sure that I would want that to be Knotz. Luke Dashjr as the head developer and main maintainer, no thanks. He claims to have been hacked and lost over 200 BTC. Some of those coins he allegedly kept in cold wallets. I wouldn't want the security of my Bitcoin wallet to rely on a person who gets his cold wallets hacked. And if he wasn't hacked and the story was made up, then he is lying. I also wouldn't trust a liar.

Furthermore, Luke hasn't been a huge contributor to core, in volume. His projects barely get the attention of other core developers which debunked most of his contribution from getting added into the network. For him to come with this new controversial approach that got everyone talking made it really open why he's always not getting the approval of most other core developers. Fortunately, he got the attention once more, unfortunately it wouldn't endure.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 08, 2025, 03:54:04 PM

Quote from: aipercoin on October 08, 2025, 03:02:57 PM

I'm so sorry, but you didn't include your website

so it's a little complicated to register and redeem

He posted the website link on his profile.

ah ok, i dont see it in the post. Thank you

Quote from: Pmalek on October 12, 2025, 06:41:50 AM

The company has already stated a few months ago that EU orders will be shipped from warehouses in Europe. That covers the EU zone at least and decreases shipping fees.

Wow, I wasn�t aware of such positive development in their shipping policy. I�ll definitely check it out in case I need their new Passport Prime wallet, but that�s likely to be at least two years from now since the device needs to be tested over time. Plus, the price of the Passport Prime could drop by then. Even $50 - $30 decrease could make the big difference.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 11, 2025, 03:38:16 PM

I guess it's a combination of the two. Many different services have been leaked and had their databases stolen. If they find your info in one crypto-related database, they will just assume that you have accounts and use other services as well.
~snip~

Although such attempts don't actually cost them anything, it seems to me that in the concrete case they are shooting at nothing, given that this hardware wallet is one of the most expensive on the market and that it is owned by a relatively small number of people. Furthermore, these same people could be considered more advanced, given that it is still a device that is at a higher level of sophistication. This does not mean that the average user cannot master its use, but it is not as simple as a classic hardware wallet.

Quote from: m2017 on Today at 10:35:28 AM

~snip~
I would like to buy this device (and test the capabilities), but the price is a bit scary, and when combined with the delivery, it's downright terrifying.

Will wait for discounts.

Have you looked at the reseller list? For me personally, this is a much better (cheaper option) when it comes to ordering within the EU, except for those who are extra paranoid and want to buy directly from the manufacturer. As for the discount, I don't know that I have ever seen a significant discount on this device considering that it is produced in the US and in very small quantities, unlike some others.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:49:50 AM

Discord i Slack koriste mnoge kompanije u poslovne svrhe. Ako igrom slučaja radi� za jednu takvu tvrtku, komunicirate preko Discorda i tu se dijele bitne informacije u vezi posla, i onda Discord zatra�i provjeru identiteta, nađe� se u nezgodnoj situaciji. Ako je ta verifikacija obavezna, te�ko da mo�e� reći nadređenima da je ti neće� izvr�iti i nek pronađu novi način da komuniciraju s tobom. Ne vjerujem da je veliki broj takvih slučajeva čiji su se podaci na�li u ovom leak-u ali hoću da ka�em da ima vi�e razloga zbog čega bi neko podjelio osobne podatke sa DIscordom i njihovim partnerskim slu�bama.

Iskreno nisam imao pojma da kompanije koriste Discord u poslovne svrhe. U mojoj glavi to je i dalje platforma za gejmere i crypto ekipu, kakva je u biti nekad prvenstveno i bila pa mi otud i cudjenje da netko updejta osobne iskaznice i radi verifikacije.

Quote from: cryptofrka on Today at 09:39:43 AM

Ekipa, ste �ivi? Grin

Kako ne. Vec jedno 7-8 godina nemam nikakve aplikacije za pracenje cijena, cak sam i CMC/Coingecko obrisao sa bookmarkova tako da sam se skroz maknuo od svega toga. Tek malopije kad sam sjeo na komp i vidio tvoj post sam otisao na Coingecko da vidim koji kurac se dogadja, i sve sto mogu reci je da cemo dobiti vise bitcoina od signature kampanje. Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on October 03, 2025, 11:14:48 AM

Those interested in buying a Foundation Devices hardware device can use promo code "BRANDON" and get $10 off of their purchase. I tried the code with a Passport Core at checkout and it works. It's not a big discount, but still, why pay $10 more if you can pay $10 less. I found the code on social media and I am not sure how long it will be valid for.

I checked, the promo code still works.

And if pay in bitcoins (isn't that what this cryptocurrency was created for?), you'll get another 3% discount, which will increase the discount to to approximately $16-19 (depending on the device model).

Foundation also give a $10 discount on shipping (I have no idea under what pretext), but if they give it, then why refuse.

But they're out of gift cards. Although, why bother (only if you're giving a physical gift of a card looks nice) when you can send a bitcoin directly as a gift (to a newbie who doesn't have a hardware wallet?).

Quote from: Pmalek on October 10, 2025, 07:37:42 AM

Passport Foundation warns its customers that they are aware that there have been reports of phishing emails being sent where scammers point people to a fake website.
~snip~

Did I miss something about how scammers know who to send phishing e-mails to, or do they send them randomly using some already existing leaked databases? I assume this is a classic seed stealer where the scammer tries to convince people to enter their seed on a fake website or in this case a fake desktop app.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:17:55 AM

Is there also a command to get one address per line with no commas or quotation marks between them?

Since Electrum is based on Python, the commands used are relative to Python. To separate lines in Python, use\n as @hosemary suggests. However, you can separate lines however you like by simply changing what's inside the quotes in the join.

For example, to add a space after a comma, you add it like this:

Code:

', '.join(wallet.get_receiving_addresses())

Or you could do something like this:

Code:

exec("for a in wallet.get_receiving_addresses(): print('btc: ' + a)")

btc: 1ewuiuwieu...
btc: 1dfjfkfjdkfjk...
btc: 1dffdsasjdkj...

As long as you follow Python's rules.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (60) 13660 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 294 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 8864 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4150 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1719 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2656 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 9553 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4326 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2394 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8569 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5796 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8139 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1600 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5837 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1814 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (9) 6299 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1818 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 169515: EcuaMobi (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2553 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5919 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6454 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3096 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +130 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3083 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3965 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3409 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10969 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3998 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (56) 19022 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 6152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2812 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 8293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (3) 675 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1304 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3752 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 439 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1444 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3494 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1083 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6238 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +97 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3941 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1715 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (3) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 5055 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4189 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 14680 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2986 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +74 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (30) 10987 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1164 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1932 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 8858 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3206 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2352 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3017 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6947 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 11199 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 3167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3591 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 19122 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2321 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2632 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2374 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4964 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5101 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 971 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5210 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 7294 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1668 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 9043 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1486 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5902 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2815 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +6 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2049 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (7932 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 5797: grue (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (474 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (435 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 13813: smooth (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 14716: rb1205 (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:17:55 AM

Is there also a command to get one address per line with no commas or quotation marks between them?

All you need to do is to replace the ',' with '\n' in the python code. \n represents line break in python.

So the command should be as follows.

Code:

print('\n'.join(wallet.get_receiving_addresses()))

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:59:39 AM

Volio bi da vidim onoga koji je prije dva ili tri dana tipovao da će vrijednost Bitcoina danas biti $112,000 a sutra mo�da jo� i ni�a. Kakvo krvoproliće sinoć. Ne pamtim dan kad je BTC tako brzo izgubio na vrijedosti. Puno toga opet miri�e na ciljanu manipulaciju. Sav će ovaj bitcoin iz ruku malih investitora otići u ruke velikih igrača. Velika narand�a�ta beba očekivala Nobelovu nagradu za mir a po�to je nije dobila evo onda Kini tarife od 100% čisto da napakostim svima.

Mene ovaj noća�nji pad jako podsjeća na Covid crash iz 2020. godine. Tada je cijena BTC-a u jednom danu pala za 44% (s $8000 na $4400). Ovaj put BTC nije pao tako jako ali su altovi uni�teni. Pogotovo smallcap i midcap altovi. Nadam se samo da će nakon ovog pada slijediti �to je slijedilo i nakon Covid crasha - veliki pump.

Weekly update (2025-10-03_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1759459401 5 1220979.msg12789630 18321 333827
1759459255 3 5560573.msg65874301 1068464 3608509
1759459089 3 5561026.msg65874111 1068464 30747
1759458855 1 178336.msg65820780 3486361 2755547
1759458843 1 178336.msg65820728 3486361 317618
1759458740 1 178336.msg65820287 3486361 459836
1759458501 4 5559000.msg65802245 379147 995810
1759457957 1 178336.msg65813387 3486361 33156
1759456996 1 5561026.msg65874111 3486361 30747
1759456805 2 5489893.msg65873686 1166480 1416877
1759456632 2 5500380.msg65873681 1166480 3645972
1759456486 1 178336.msg65801276 3486361 2755547
1759456239 2 5551687.msg65873892 1166480 407174
1759455728 2 178336.msg65874223 1089623 569455
1759454603 25 1790.msg28917 35501 3
1759454442 1 178336.msg65874051 1027694 533727
1759454055 1 178336.msg65873390 1027694 1067333
1759453966 1 5173493.msg65871767 1174868 983960
1759453333 1 178336.msg65795750 3486361 2755547
1759453321 1 178336.msg65795681 3486361 18321
1759453130 2 178336.msg65795330 3486361 2755547
1759452970 1 178336.msg65794788 3486361 198573
1759452877 1 178336.msg65792617 3486361 2003859
1759452810 1 178336.msg65792085 3486361 881377
1759452284 1 178336.msg65788575 3486361 198573
1759452082 1 178336.msg65785474 3486361 129815
1759451746 1 178336.msg65873953 198573 223922
1759451740 1 5253221.msg65870290 2390454 984234
1759451517 1 178336.msg65783100 3486361 998490
1759450692 1 178336.msg65775773 3486361 33156
1759450449 1 178336.msg65774652 3486361 317618
1759450268 1 178336.msg65870225 386538 223922
1759449847 1 178336.msg65767113 3486361 128156
1759449755 2 178336.msg65872828 1174580 223922
1759449729 2 178336.msg65873586 1174580 1089623
1759448767 13 5560422.msg65853505 407174 3579677
1759447611 3 5548626.msg65544788 949248 3136945
1759447449 2 5561025.msg65873358 3723928 3721599
1759447238 1 5560925.msg65873837 355846 2004043
1759447223 1 5560925.msg65873562 355846 317618
1759447212 1 5560925.msg65873450 355846 557798
1759447184 1 5560925.msg65872643 355846 802441
1759447159 1 5560925.msg65871967 355846 1292764
1759447145 1 5560925.msg65871965 355846 971544
1759446678 2 5327577.msg65869899 137185 1593137
1759446280 1 5526415.msg65873936 3704391 881377
1759445805 1 5111785.msg65873605 137773 1016855
1759445702 2 5537776.msg65760972 407174 349303
1759445565 1 178336.msg65873685 1089623 64507
1759445511 1 5561027.msg65873529 3503033 3546931
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (52 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 3281 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 03 Oct 2025 04:43:21 AM CEST, OgNasty (history) sent 5 Merit to ingiltere (history) for 2022 NBA Season.
On Fri 03 Oct 2025 04:40:55 AM CEST, Xal0lex (history) sent 3 Merit to Sticky Bomb (history) for Re: ANN - 2025 Bitcointalk Annual Pumpkin Carving Contest .
On Fri 03 Oct 2025 04:38:09 AM CEST, Xal0lex (history) sent 3 Merit to Vod (history) for Re: Looking for a reliable full-service moving company.
On Fri 03 Oct 2025 04:34:15 AM CEST, PowerGlove (history) sent 1 Merit to OutOfMemory (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 03 Oct 2025 04:34:03 AM CEST, PowerGlove (history) sent 1 Merit to nutildah (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (551 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 7932 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 804 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3729034: underwood77 (history) earned: 4 Merit.
3729205: CMD1982 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3729450: CyBET_Casino (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3729733: Anthony Bill (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3729756: LonelyEcho (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3724640: Zaposhi.com
3724916: T-Chad
3724979: Alonso_
3725003: pancelot
3725106: twilighvanquisher
3725191: Gamblr.io
3725222: NateShaw
3725226: badjoke-lab
3725269: BaronZemodas
3725289: rc_monkey
3725479: Djithbit
3725618: Hypnotizer
3725623: Pauldesaints
3725649: BattleDog
3725863: howardsentell@aol.com
3726133: HODLstack
3726250: Mhizlove
3726254: El_Tammy
3726322: thomuso
3726426: BULATTA
3726429: AP Taurus Capital
3726460: jeckyll
3726556: AreBar
3726657: davesta_xcp
3726659: mydogecoin
3726814: bitwalhr
3726859: Cryptohunterkill
3727048: skyperry
3727067: flapduck
3727274: BlueEye1006
3727339: Avsuckerpunch
3727462: Clearpilled
3727568: NoLoss1
3727959: Baridomale
3728199: Xhowdhury
3728228: Sabio
3728240: chacalcareca
3728291: driverom
3728426: VoltaCX
3728470: dem2084
3728545: Alba Renner III
3728880: uvaml.io
3728888: Bernd680
3728906: ThrillCasino
3728915: purpgoose
3729034: underwood77
3729205: CMD1982
3729450: CyBET_Casino
3729733: Anthony Bill
3729756: LonelyEcho

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:7932
4:0:804
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:723
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14034:13660
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:294
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1402
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3724640:0:1
3724916:0:1
3724979:0:4
3725003:3:7
3725106:0:10
3725191:0:1
3725222:0:4
3725226:0:6
3725269:0:5
3725289:0:4
3725479:2:5
3725618:0:29
3725623:0:2
3725649:11:96
3725863:0:1
3726133:0:1
3726250:0:5
3726254:1:5
3726322:0:5
3726426:0:1
3726429:0:6
3726460:0:2
3726556:0:2
3726657:0:1
3726659:0:1
3726814:0:2
3726859:0:1
3727048:0:2
3727067:0:15
3727274:0:1
3727339:0:1
3727462:0:1
3727568:0:1
3727959:0:1
3728199:0:1
3728228:0:1
3728240:0:1
3728291:0:1
3728426:0:1
3728470:0:1
3728545:0:1
3728880:0:1
3728888:0:7
3728906:0:1
3728915:0:9
3729034:0:4
3729205:0:2
3729450:0:1
3729733:0:1
3729756:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50335
Sample

Code:

1. 19122 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 726 unique users in 10400 transactions
2. 19022 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1073 unique users in 10862 transactions
3. 18864 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9969 transactions
4. 14680 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 473 unique users in 8487 transactions
5. 13660 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1210 unique users in 4868 transactions
6. 12050 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 681 unique users in 8066 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11199 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 647 unique users in 6415 transactions
9. 10987 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 555 unique users in 4305 transactions
10. 10969 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 587 unique users in 6373 transactions
11. 10923 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 474 unique users in 6118 transactions
12. 10064 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 494 unique users in 5324 transactions
13. 9553 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 556 unique users in 5451 transactions
14. 9331 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 323 unique users in 4764 transactions
15. 9076 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 617 unique users in 4850 transactions
16. 9043 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 504 unique users in 4211 transactions
17. 8864 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 326 unique users in 3111 transactions
18. 8858 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 377 unique users in 3132 transactions
19. 8698 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 424 unique users in 4335 transactions
20. 8569 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 395 unique users in 4650 transactions
21. 8383 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 571 unique users in 4792 transactions
22. 8293 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 514 unique users in 3806 transactions
23. 8240 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 443 unique users in 4880 transactions
24. 8210 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 518 unique users in 4430 transactions
25. 8139 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 560 unique users in 4756 transactions
26. 7932 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 399 unique users in 866 transactions
27. 7698 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 386 unique users in 4077 transactions
28. 7494 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4101 transactions
29. 7294 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 446 unique users in 4048 transactions
30. 7096 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 400 unique users in 3626 transactions
31. 6947 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 565 unique users in 4128 transactions
32. 6543 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 224 unique users in 1662 transactions
33. 6454 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 273 unique users in 2930 transactions
34. 6401 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 365 unique users in 3239 transactions
35. 6299 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 471 unique users in 3492 transactions
36. 6257 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 914 unique users in 4053 transactions
37. 6238 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 365 unique users in 3399 transactions
38. 6152 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 616 unique users in 3439 transactions
39. 6012 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2628 transactions
40. 5925 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 403 unique users in 3238 transactions
41. 5919 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 450 unique users in 3325 transactions
42. 5902 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 394 unique users in 3432 transactions
43. 5837 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 212 unique users in 3424 transactions
44. 5797 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 189 unique users in 3383 transactions
45. 5796 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 320 unique users in 2651 transactions
46. 5783 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 509 unique users in 3396 transactions
47. 5453 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 217 unique users in 3058 transactions
48. 5323 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 197 unique users in 3057 transactions
49. 5210 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 409 unique users in 2567 transactions
50. 5101 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 359 unique users in 2432 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50286. 1 Merit received by 1Cryptonutaya1 (#2080901) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50287. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50288. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50289. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50290. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50291. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50292. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50293. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50294. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50295. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50296. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50297. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50298. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50299. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50300. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50301. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50302. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50303. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50304. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50305. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50306. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50307. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50308. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50309. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50310. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50311. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50312. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50313. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50314. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50315. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50316. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50317. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50318. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50319. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50320. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50321. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50322. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50323. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50324. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50325. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50326. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50327. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50328. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50329. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50330. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50331. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50332. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50333. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50334. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50335. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26358
Sample

Code:

1. 66909 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 874 unique users in 12085 transactions
2. 63699 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2088 unique users in 27341 transactions
3. 63169 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3273 unique users in 17050 transactions
4. 54395 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3465 unique users in 52245 transactions
5. 54043 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4341 unique users in 31425 transactions
6. 44308 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3521 unique users in 30874 transactions
7. 41886 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2745 unique users in 14708 transactions
8. 41791 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9154 transactions
9. 36640 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2814 unique users in 29691 transactions
10. 36180 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2451 unique users in 13380 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 32047 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1543 unique users in 13340 transactions
13. 31081 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1435 unique users in 10119 transactions
14. 26953 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1643 unique users in 6417 transactions
15. 26715 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 1984 unique users in 9706 transactions
16. 26661 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1363 unique users in 6668 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 20982 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1300 unique users in 9027 transactions
21. 20572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6387 transactions
22. 15807 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1907 unique users in 6401 transactions
23. 15155 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 641 unique users in 5454 transactions
24. 15143 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 720 unique users in 5557 transactions
25. 15002 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1681 unique users in 6986 transactions
26. 14034 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1008 unique users in 1621 transactions
27. 13807 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1127 unique users in 8513 transactions
28. 13637 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1565 unique users in 3599 transactions
29. 13620 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1258 unique users in 7779 transactions
30. 13341 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 511 unique users in 6222 transactions
31. 13190 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1557 unique users in 6650 transactions
32. 12740 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 651 unique users in 3539 transactions
33. 12557 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1301 unique users in 5787 transactions
34. 12350 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1298 unique users in 7008 transactions
35. 12247 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2889 unique users in 6597 transactions
36. 12215 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1091 unique users in 7374 transactions
37. 12189 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 791 unique users in 4096 transactions
38. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
39. 12051 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 795 unique users in 5801 transactions
40. 10015 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 536 unique users in 3903 transactions
41. 9645 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1047 unique users in 5581 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 7911 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 327 unique users in 3244 transactions
45. 7799 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 998 unique users in 3387 transactions
46. 7693 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 925 unique users in 3387 transactions
47. 7397 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 686 unique users in 6631 transactions
48. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
49. 6973 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 560 unique users in 6272 transactions
50. 6652 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 476 unique users in 3775 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26309. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26310. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26311. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26312. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26313. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26314. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26315. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26316. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26317. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26318. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26319. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26320. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26321. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26322. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26323. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26324. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26325. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26326. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26327. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26328. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26329. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26330. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26331. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26332. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26333. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26334. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26335. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26336. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26337. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26338. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26339. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26340. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26341. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26342. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26343. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26344. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26345. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26346. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26347. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26348. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26349. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26350. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26351. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26352. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26353. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26354. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26355. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26356. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26357. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26358. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 307122 (14.26%)
Tuesday 308079 (14.30%)
Wednesday 308309 (14.31%)
Thursday 329163 (15.28%)
Friday 328102 (15.23%)
Saturday 285800 (13.27%)
Sunday 286754 (13.31%)
Total: 2153329

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:12:07 AM

Nakon devetog tjedna zavr�ena je Aark.Digital signature kampanja uz mogućnost da se nastavi nakon �to se projekat dodatno pro�iri i usluga pobolj�a.
Gledao sam tablicu učesnkika i vidim da iz na�eg lokala niko nije bio dio kampanje. Aark.Digital je imao samo osam članova i nisu privukli neka velika imena.

Quote from: Little Mouse on October 09, 2025, 04:12:16 PM

Unfortunately, this is the end of this campaign until the team further develops the project.

You are free to remove the signature.

Delovala mi je kao dobra kampanja koja moze da potraje ali sad kad si spomenuo tablicu skroz je druga prica na kraju ...

Otvorena je nova kampanja koju vodi God Of Thunder EpicBet traze se Hero/Legendary memberi

Isplata je $50 u BTC-u

Pravila

Minimum 25 postova je potrebno za isplatu

Minimum 10 postova u gambling sekciji je potrebno za isplatu

Maksimum 5 postova u lokalu se racuna

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:13:31 AM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on October 09, 2025, 04:25:43 PM

Okay this is good and I have to go through this videos and learn more about them.
At least it would save my ass from getting messed up when trying to play, you know what someone didn't know how it works it could be as if someone is trying to gamble trial by error methods which could cause more loses to that person.

You can always play with fun money in demo mode to see how it goes. I would recommend you don't bet real money until you are completely comfortable with the rules and all the options available to you.

Playing with fun money is completely different from playing with real money. It may help you familiarize yourself with the dynamics of the game, but if you get very good results with fun money, don't be overconfident. I would recommend starting with real money with amounts a bit lower than what you feel comfortable with.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 09, 2025, 03:20:14 PM

Quote from: 3kpk3 on October 09, 2025, 08:00:45 AM

I guess if the player isn't willing to cooperate, he wouldn't be eligible for a refund since it would look like he had something to hide.

Maybe the person can't provide the requested and satisfying information even if they wanted to. It's difficult to know the origin of all your coins if you aren't keeping tags. You might find yourself in the possession of crypto that exchanges or casinos classify as "dirty" without being the cause of that dirt and only being the person that suffers the consequences.

Quote from: PlayBit on October 09, 2025, 08:28:13 AM

The funds are sent back to the address from which the transfer was made. We also don't need to spoil our address history.

That's good to know. Is this mentioned in your Terms of Service somewhere? If it is, can you point me to the exact clause please?
Also, is there an AML service that you recommend players could use to find out the risk score of their coins before depositing to your casino? The same one you use would be best.

Quote from: PlayBit on October 09, 2025, 08:28:13 AM

But this is in case no OFFICIAL request has been received (which is very unlikely; in my experience, this has never happened).

An official request from a government body asking to have the money confiscated?

Our legal department has reviewed your request and approved it. The clause has been added to the Terms of Service.

Thank you for your help and desire to make us even better!

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:48:30 AM

There was another massive win on MetaWin yesterday. This time it looks like it's from a highroller because the stake was $150. The player's name is baa111b4, and he won $78,960 playing Sugar Rush.
As always, MetaWin is giving away extra money to one person who comments on the tweet what they would do with $78,000 if they won.

Link to the tweet:
https://x.com/MetaWin/status/1975950405327577144

Slot games are always exciting to follow, and the wins of other gamblers can be incredibly motivating. I often watch videos of slot players on social media, Showing them winning fantastic amounts.
I'm even surprised they're brave enough to buy FS with large sums of money. Are they high rollers or influencers funded by casinos to promote their casino?

However, that's not a big deal, as big wins from close friends or others shared on social media can actually boost our gambling enthusiasm. I often play slots, But I don't like Pragmatic play because their games are so difficult for me. I prefer playing on PGSoft, where it's easy to get scatters without having to buy in.

Quote from: SmartGold01 on Today at 04:25:43 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:37:46 PM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on Today at 01:39:11 PM

Sorry to draw your attention anyway, please is there any video that fully expressed what you said maybe I can go through the video to learn...

YouTube has many videos on how to play Baccarat. This one is two minutes long and explains the basics.
You can also watch this one that goes into more details about the rules, like when is a third card drawn and when it isn't. You will also see a few rounds played on screen with explanations from the narrator.

Okay this is good and I have to go through this videos and learn more about them.
At least it would save my ass from getting messed up when trying to play, you know what someone didn't know how it works it could be as if someone is trying to gamble trial by error methods which could cause more loses to that person.
I will devote my time to watch those video and try it out again to see how I could make an attempt.

The rules on baccarat is very basic which I believe you can easily catch up if play a few rounds. The goal is just getting 9 as the highest score.

My dilemma on playing this game is when I check the game history. Since we are just betting between player and dealer. There�s an influence that the side that is on losing streak will have higher chance to win on the next round but in reality is the game is independent to each other unlike other games that you have no choice to play your own hand.

Baccarat is a fun game especially the bonus the rewards up to x100.

I've been slacking with these overviews for quite some time, publishing them at the end of the month, so this time I've decided to do it a bit earlier for a change. As always, all charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic Space.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards.

Post activity per local board during September 2025

Increase of activity in Nigerian board continues, from 3812 posts in August to 4255 in September, making it their new all time high. At the same time, majority of the other very active local boards had decreased activity, and that's something that is going on for a while.

Generally speaking, no surprise that total amount of posts written across local boards dropped from 13107 in August to 12612 in September.

Active members per local board during September 2025

During the last month, 1292 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards, which is a decrease compared to August (1344).

While in August Russian board still had more active members than Nigerian board, this changed in September and now Nigerian is finally topping this chart as well, and the difference will probably keep increasing. All the other local boards are far behind the others, with mostly decreased number of active members compared to month before.

Local board members per amount of posts during September 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Spanish is the leader with 54% of such members, while Pakistan local had only 12% members in that bracket.

In the 2-9 posts bracket, Polish the leader with 60%, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage of such members (21%)

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Nigerian and Portuguese local boards ahsred the 1st spot with 47%, while French had only 6% of members in that group.

Merit shared per local board during September 2025

During September, 8922 merit was shared acorss local boards, which is a decrease compared to month before (9258). Even the record high 2964 merit that was shared in Nigerian board didn't help, which is due the fact that many of the other active local boards had decrease of merit in that period. It will be inreersting to see whether Nigerian local breaks the 3k merit shared mark, something that hasn't been broken in local boards since the early merit days, back in 2018 in Russian board.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during September 2025

The average merit per post across local boards was 0.7, the exactly the same as in August. Once again Romanian is at the top, and this time with even higher ratio than month before, and again followed by German board while this time Italian board is 3rd instead of Spanish.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during September 2025

During September, 582 members sent while 656 received merit. Nigerian local board dominates this board as well, with the diference that hasn't been seen in a long time.

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during September 2025

I thought that 100% of merited posts in Romanian board was just an anomaly, but they almost managed to achieve that 2 months in a row while Polish board also had a very high percentage, but its no so weird given their amount of posts. What is a surprise though is Italian board, given their pretty good overall activity (that was lower than usual in the last few months).

Merit per transaction across local boards during September 2025

This month German board is at the top having which is not the surprise given their high merit per post ratio, but French and Greek definitely are.

The most active members per local board during September 2025

Last but not the list in this monthly overview, list of the most active members per local board. joker_josue from Portuguese board remained at the top with 144 posts, while executijere and mandown from Turkish board are at the 2nd and 3rd spot with also respectable 140 and 124 posts. GG guys, keep it up!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. klarki [124]	\|	1. MaxMueller [82]	\|	1. execijutiere [140]	\|	1. Ale88 [47]	\|	1. joker_josue [144]	\|	1. famososMuertos [57]	\|
2. zasad@ [90]	\|	2. Lakai01 [77]	\|	2. mandown [124]	\|	2. fillippone [40]	\|	2. TryNinja [62]	\|	2. darxiaomi [52]	\|
3. Numeral [85]	\|	3. cygan [58]	\|	3. ajanwalker [66]	\|	3. Ace [36]	\|	3. bitmover [59]	\|	3. Porfirii [31]	\|
4. Julien_Olynpic [79]	\|	4. Koal-84 [50]	\|	4. RaltcoinsB [62]	\|	4. babo [30]	\|	4. sabotag3x [52]	\|	4. danadc [23]	\|
5. Alex077 [64]	\|	5. MinoRaiola [50]	\|	5. yenerbatmaz [54]	\|	5. Plutosky [28]	\|	5. mikel_012 [49]	\|	5. Don Pedro Dinero [21]	\|
6. safar1980 [48]	\|	6. Real-Duke [40]	\|	6. blomen [52]	\|	6. conilmionome [27]	\|	6. Forsyth Jones [38]	\|	6. Hispo [15]	\|
7. Lannakosa [42]	\|	7. Unknown01 [34]	\|	7. Mustang Shelby [51]	\|	7. Lillominato89 [26]	\|	7. alegotardo [36]	\|	7. paxmao [7]	\|
8. Excimer [41]	\|	8. mole0815 [29]	\|	8. eightdots [44]	\|	8. gbianchi [24]	\|	8. velhoti [26]	\|	8. btc-marty [6]	\|
9. KTChampions [41]	\|	9. 5tift [21]	\|	9. xzone [41]	\|	9. giorgione [22]	\|	9. alexrossi [22]	\|	9. darbitmobilerecovery [6]	\|
10. eisen33 [39]	\|	10. Soonandwaite [20]	\|	10. Black Mbaye [40]	\|	10. martinom [18]	\|	10. rdluffy [22]	\|	10. d5000 [5]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. traderethereum [25]	\|	1. Danydee [12]	\|	1. gunhell16 [63]	\|	1. slackovic [45]	\|	1. Jubilee58 [83]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [36]	\|
2. Rashlyowl [24]	\|	2. patrickus [9]	\|	2. technicalguy83 [55]	\|	2. ovcijisir [41]	\|	2. Charles-Tim [75]	\|	2. yhiaali3 [24]	\|
3. Nahl [22]	\|	3. oscar2000 [5]	\|	3. tech30338 [54]	\|	3. katanic97 [38]	\|	3. Mr_Brilliant$ [52]	\|	3. khaled0111 [23]	\|
4. maydna [22]	\|	4. TryNinja [4]	\|	4. blockman [52]	\|	4. Pmalek [27]	\|	4. Floxynice [51]	\|	4. FoxTM1 [7]	\|
5. mu_enrico [21]	\|	5. akfreebtc [4]	\|	5. Peanutswar [42]	\|	5. examplens [26]	\|	5. Donk1 [49]	\|	5. HistoLock [7]	\|
6. Akbarkoe [20]	\|	6. GrosWesh [3]	\|	6. cryptoaddictchie [37]	\|	6. Rikafip [20]	\|	6. Bright0515 [48]	\|	6. AP Taurus Capital [6]	\|
7. joniboini [20]	\|	7. SimonBHB [3]	\|	7. arwin100 [27]	\|	7. Trofo [17]	\|	7. Tonimez [42]	\|	7. Ochan_yazo_tochant [6]	\|
8. TelolettOm [18]	\|	8. G.Seed [2]	\|	8. Russlenat [23]	\|	8. dkbit98 [13]	\|	8. Karl_3000 [40]	\|	8. Sebastian Michaelis [5]	\|
9. MAAManda [17]	\|	9. mably [2]	\|	9. bhadz [22]	\|	9. paco92x [11]	\|	9. JoyceBTC [37]	\|	9. hugeblack [4]	\|
10. masulum [15]	\|	10. Becassin [1]	\|	10. coin-investor [21]	\|	10. CroBoy12 [9]	\|	10. PremiumcryptoHub [36]	\|	10. GxSTxV [2]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [26]	\|	1. Bitcoin Smith [42]	\|	1. Ultegra134 [18]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [12]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [76]	\|	1. Bd officer [23]	\|
2. TryNinja [4]	\|	2. JSRAW [32]	\|	2. cryptosize [10]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	\|	2. JunaidAzizi [40]	\|	2. Crypto Library [22]	\|
3. pawel7777 [4]	\|	3. pawanjain [28]	\|	3. condoras [8]	\|	3. TryNinja [4]	\|	3. BTC FutureKing [31]	\|	3. DYING_S0UL [18]	\|
4. ertil [2]	\|	4. henry1111 [20]	\|	4. alani123 [6]	\|	4. othell_rogue [1]	\|	4. ZAINmalik75 [31]	\|	4. God Of Thunder [14]	\|
5. EXMON [1]	\|	5. IIrik11 [19]	\|	5. apogio [4]	\|		\|	5. HustleZ [28]	\|	5. Z_MBFM [12]	\|
	\|	6. henmark [17]	\|	6. Satos21 [1]	\|		\|	6. Cheema02 [25]	\|	6. Shishir99 [9]	\|
	\|	7. TheUltraElite [14]	\|	7. siderisng [1]	\|		\|	7. MusaPk [24]	\|	7. LDL [8]	\|
	\|	8. XXKK-Exchange [12]	\|		\|		\|	8. Ab de villiers [21]	\|	8. Mahiyammahi [7]	\|
	\|	9. libert19 [10]	\|		\|		\|	9. Publictalk792 [20]	\|	9. Review Master [7]	\|
	\|	10. LucyFurr [9]	\|		\|		\|	10. Compromise me [18]	\|	10. Yea_btc [5]	\|

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:37:46 PM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on Today at 01:39:11 PM

Sorry to draw your attention anyway, please is there any video that fully expressed what you said maybe I can go through the video to learn...

YouTube has many videos on how to play Baccarat. This one is two minutes long and explains the basics.
You can also watch this one that goes into more details about the rules, like when is a third card drawn and when it isn't. You will also see a few rounds played on screen with explanations from the narrator.

Okay this is good and I have to go through this videos and learn more about them.
At least it would save my ass from getting messed up when trying to play, you know what someone didn't know how it works it could be as if someone is trying to gamble trial by error methods which could cause more loses to that person.
I will devote my time to watch those video and try it out again to see how I could make an attempt.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 08, 2025, 07:29:04 AM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on October 08, 2025, 01:17:55 AM

Have never gambled on Baccarat and most time these casinos games are difficult handle but of course started getting used to some games which I think could be that easier with time when I keep playing and trying out, but for now it would surely be on learn phase where I really need know the functionalities and also knows well about the rules of the game, have never also tried out blackjack .

Baccarat isn't as popular as Blackjack but it's even easier to play. There is very little that the player needs to do besides deciding whether to bet on the Player or the Banker. After that, the game round plays out by itself based on the rules of play. Essentially, the winning hand is the one that gets a total value of 9 or closest to 9 without going over.

You can learn the rules in 10 mins. Cards 2-9 are worth their face values. Face cards are worth 0 and aces are worth 1. Total hand values can only be from 0 to 9. It doesn't go above that. If you get a hand value above 10, you just remove the first digit to get the final count. an 8 and a 4 is 12 in total. Remove the 1, and your total hand value is 2.

Baccarat isn't as interesting as Blackjack, though. That's my personal opinion. The minimalistic decision-making is one of the reasons.

Sorry to draw your attention anyway, please is there any video that fully expressed what you said maybe I can go through the video to learn because from your explanation it seems to simple to you to understand it but a bit twisted for me because I haven't played it for the first time but wishing to expand myself about games for that I gamble round without specializing only Sport betting. This could go along way if there is any.. Thanks

Quote from: PlayBit on Today at 08:28:13 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:39:30 AM

Quote from: PlayBit on October 08, 2025, 04:00:41 PM

A clear answer to your question. If you make a deposit from an address that has been involved in criminal activity, your account will be frozen until the matter is clarified.

If an account gets frozen and the player can't provide answers or proof that satisfies your team and AML partners, what happens with the money? Will you keep it, will you send it back, or will the funds move somewhere else? If a player can't or doesn't want to cooperate with your investigation and instead requests to get a refund, will you refund the money?

The funds are sent back to the address from which the transfer was made. We also don't need to spoil our address history.

But this is in case no OFFICIAL request has been received (which is very unlikely; in my experience, this has never happened).

If a person has nothing to hide, we are always willing to meet them halfway. First and foremost, it is in our best interest to be as loyal as possible to our players. After all, positive feedback, even in such a situation, is only a plus for us.

But if a player does not respond, does not cooperate, and is not polite in communication, then there is reason to believe that these funds are involved in something illegal, and then they are frozen at the address and await resolution.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:39:30 AM

Quote from: PlayBit on October 08, 2025, 04:00:41 PM

A clear answer to your question. If you make a deposit from an address that has been involved in criminal activity, your account will be frozen until the matter is clarified.

If an account gets frozen and the player can't provide answers or proof that satisfies your team and AML partners, what happens with the money? Will you keep it, will you send it back, or will the funds move somewhere else? If a player can't or doesn't want to cooperate with your investigation and instead requests to get a refund, will you refund the money?

The funds are sent back to the address from which the transfer was made. We also don't need to spoil our address history.

But this is in case no OFFICIAL request has been received (which is very unlikely; in my experience, this has never happened).

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:39:30 AM

If an account gets frozen and the player can't provide answers or proof that satisfies your team and AML partners, what happens with the money? Will you keep it, will you send it back, or will the funds move somewhere else? If a player can't or doesn't want to cooperate with your investigation and instead requests to get a refund, will you refund the money?

Good question. Arbitration would be necessary in these cases to sort everything out, but the team should be willing to go for it proving that they have nothing to hide. This can be done within this forum itself or other sites like AG, CG etc.

I guess if the player isn't willing to cooperate, he wouldn't be eligible for a refund since it would look like he had something to hide.

Quote from: bitmover on October 06, 2025, 09:36:27 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on October 06, 2025, 07:01:12 AM

Quote from: bitmover on October 05, 2025, 11:23:11 AM

There are still many good alternatives, where you can simply exchange any btc for stablecoins without kyc/aml. For now, i like to use Hyperliquid but there are many other good ones.

Hyperliquid isn't non-custodial, though. They like to pretend they are. They carry out checks on the coins that get deposited on their exchange. I have read several stories of users who have had their bitcoin frozen on Hyperliquid and simply locked out of their accounts. I considered using them in the past but not anymore. Do an internet search on "can hyperliquid freeze your funds" or something similar and you will see what I am talking about.

Yeah, i know they are custodial service.

Just like exch or any other service.

Every time you send bitcoin , those coins can be frozen.

In my situation , they accepted many coins that were refused by other services.

I think people from bitcointalk could benefit a lot from hyperliquid. It is way better than 99% of the exchanges that advertise here. I think even 100% lol

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-6m-drained-hyperliquid-defi-124149253.html

is this the one you are referring?

Quote from: SmartGold01 on Today at 01:17:55 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on October 07, 2025, 07:10:42 AM

Quote from: ryzaadit on October 06, 2025, 01:34:26 PM

Just in Live-Games. I love Baccarat & BJ and now looking more into Live-Games.

I think you are the first person on the forum that I have seen who says they love to bet on Baccarat, and that it's one of their main games. Bettors aren't left with many decisions when playing Baccarat except backing either the Player or the Banker. Everything else is automated until the rounds end. Do you usually bet on the Banker or the Player or do you switch it up?

Have never gambled on Baccarat and most time these casinos games are difficult handle but of course started getting used to some games which I think could be that easier with time when I keep playing and trying out, but for now it would surely be on learn phase where I really need know the functionalities and also knows well about the rules of the game, have never also tried out blackjack .

Majority of us gamblers avoid most of the casinos in house games because of their methods a d hectic way of playing, i guess the most popular among them and most played ate poker games and a few others baccarat is not a new game but not as popular as most of the others and also not the favorite among gamblers.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:04 AM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on Today at 01:17:55 AM

Have never gambled on Baccarat and most time these casinos games are difficult handle but of course started getting used to some games which I think could be that easier with time when I keep playing and trying out, but for now it would surely be on learn phase where I really need know the functionalities and also knows well about the rules of the game, have never also tried out blackjack .

Baccarat isn't as popular as Blackjack but it's even easier to play. There is very little that the player needs to do besides deciding whether to bet on the Player or the Banker. After that, the game round plays out by itself based on the rules of play. Essentially, the winning hand is the one that gets a total value of 9 or closest to 9 without going over.

You can learn the rules in 10 mins. Cards 2-9 are worth their face values. Face cards are worth 0 and aces are worth 1. Total hand values can only be from 0 to 9. It doesn't go above that. If you get a hand value above 10, you just remove the first digit to get the final count. an 8 and a 4 is 12 in total. Remove the 1, and your total hand value is 2.

Baccarat isn't as interesting as Blackjack, though. That's my personal opinion. The minimalistic decision-making is one of the reasons.

Baccarat is somehow appealing to high rollers especially for those who seeks spectacle and speed. But for people who enjoy being so tactical on each games they play maybe they will find it boring.

While in Blackjack people have a chance to outplay the house. They have this saying that Blackjack is battle and Baccarat is a bet.

Impressive and there are lots of people winning in their casino. Also people have chance to win $400 to, just check the details and who knows they get lucky to be chosen as a winner.

Quote from: https://x.com/MetaWin/status/1975950405327577144

MetaWinner �baa111b4� just hit a MASSIVE $78,960 win from a $150 bet playing Sugar Rush on http://metawin.com! 🍭

To give somebody else the opportunity to hit a W like this�

We are GIVING AWAY $400 to 1 person who comments what they would do with $78k in winnings!

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:28:28 PM

/snip

Hardverske novčanike? Ne vidim tu ni�ta lo�e. I ja jako malo kripta dr�im na dohvat ruke i u npr. mobilnim novčanicima. Samo kad i ako mi ne�to treba onda taj dio ide u softverski novčanik s namjerom da se potro�i.

Hardverski wallet zapravo i nije tako nepraktično koristiti. Nepraktično je to �to ga mora� nositi sa sobom da bi ga koristio. Ja recimo većinu stvari vezano uz crypto odradim na poslu jer imam vi�e mira nego doma s djecom. Onda mi je jednostavnije imati sve na mobilnom walletu nego na hardware walletu jer bi ga onda morao imati na poslu. To onda nosi mogućnost da ostanem bez njega jer bi netko mogao pomisliti da je USB stick. Uglavnom, nisu ni mobilni i desktop walleti ni�ta stra�no ako čovjek zna �to radi, ako ne otvara sumnjive stranice i uzme si vremena da razmisli prije nego klikne Send ili Approve.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:51:34 PM

Welcome to Bitcointalk!
Simple and fast-loading site. Nice to see.

Two things I noticed.
- The registration window pops up every time you click on a game category from the navigation menu on the left. I understand that you want people to register, but it's a bit annoying having to close it so often.
- I was interested in viewing your sports betting section but the site won't allow me because I haven't created an account and logged in. Perhaps you can change this.

And lastly a question.
Since there is no KYC for players who gamble with crypto, is there also no AML checks for incoming crypto deposits? In other words, can a player have his crypto frozen and/or betting account locked until they provide more information about the source of their coins?

Unfortunately, only authorized users who are registered on the website can open the betting page.

Regarding AML, all transactions are naturally verified through AML/KYT, which guarantees that all payments from us will be guaranteed to be �clean� cryptocurrency, which will not raise any questions from the exchange you use.

A clear answer to your question. If you make a deposit from an address that has been involved in criminal activity, your account will be frozen until the matter is clarified.

Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 08:25:44 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:40:32 AM

Ne znam �to je ljudima problem pregledati cijelu adresu. Par sekundi du�e traje a sigurniji si nego kad samo gleda� i poredi� prve i zadnje znakove.

Ja sam jedan od onih koji inace ne pregledavaju cijelu adresu, nego recimo prvih 5-6 i zadnjih 5-6 znakova. Lijenost jebiga. Tongue

Jedina situacija gdje to radim je ako prebacujem bas ono fakat ozbiljan iznos, onda se detaljno pregledava znak po znak jedno 5 puta. Ali ovako kad saljem tipa 1 mBTC, samo ovaj gore nacin.

Ja iz tog razloga proveravam uglavnom nasumicno srednji deo adrese. Bas zato sto se proverava tih prvi par i poslednjih par, pretpostavljam da i scameri se vise trude oko tog dela. Naravno, kada je veci iznos, vizuleno jedan pored drugog pa uporedjujes.
Mada sam polako poceo da se sklanjam sa windowsa, makar tamo gde su te "neoprostive" greske moguce.
Inace, toliko sam se ulenjio sto se tice walleta, koristim hardware cak i za neke sitne, privremene transakcije.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:40:32 AM

Ne znam �to je ljudima problem pregledati cijelu adresu. Par sekundi du�e traje a sigurniji si nego kad samo gleda� i poredi� prve i zadnje znakove.

Ja sam jedan od onih koji inace ne pregledavaju cijelu adresu, nego recimo prvih 5-6 i zadnjih 5-6 znakova. Lijenost jebiga. Tongue

Jedina situacija gdje to radim je ako prebacujem bas ono fakat ozbiljan iznos, onda se detaljno pregledava znak po znak jedno 5 puta. Ali ovako kad saljem tipa 1 mBTC, samo ovaj gore nacin.

Winners;

Doan9269
Pmalek
vladu89
f150

Quote from: Pmalek on October 07, 2025, 12:08:42 PM

The non-custodial option seems region specific. I don't have it on my end. If you are interested, check if you can see it in your wallet.

No, it is not region specific. I sent an email to support@walletofsatoshi.com to inquire about this, because i couldn't also find the option in my own wallet, and this was their reply:

So i went ahead to update my wallet to the latest version in the app store, because my Wallet of Satoshi is installed in my Iphone and now i can see the option of 'switch to self custody in my wallet.' So i think you should also update your wallet if you are interested in this option.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 07, 2025, 07:10:42 AM

Quote from: ryzaadit on October 06, 2025, 01:34:26 PM

Just in Live-Games. I love Baccarat & BJ and now looking more into Live-Games.

I think you are the first person on the forum that I have seen who says they love to bet on Baccarat, and that it's one of their main games. Bettors aren't left with many decisions when playing Baccarat except backing either the Player or the Banker. Everything else is automated until the rounds end. Do you usually bet on the Banker or the Player or do you switch it up?

Have never gambled on Baccarat and most time these casinos games are difficult handle but of course started getting used to some games which I think could be that easier with time when I keep playing and trying out, but for now it would surely be on learn phase where I really need know the functionalities and also knows well about the rules of the game, have never also tried out blackjack .

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:58:58 AM

Quote from: nc50lc on Today at 04:59:09 AM

Yes, in the "Console" tab (View->Show Console), use the command: [wallet.create_new_address(False) for i in range(980)]

Won't generating that many receiving addresses in Electrum cause the software to freeze or even crash?

1000~10000 addresses is easy enough, I've even tested that before at least on a mid-range hardware.
But for the upper-limit, I haven't done some benchmarking but some threads report that their client freezes at 50,000 addresses even with high-end hardware.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 12:08:42 PM

The non-custodial option seems region specific. I don't have it on my end. If you are interested, check if you can see it in your wallet.

It would seem so, I don't see it either.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:48:28 AM

Quote from: bitmover on October 06, 2025, 06:11:22 PM

Ofc hyperlliquid is not equally dangerous as binance or changelly, for example. You can send coins with high AML and no questions will be asked, and no funds will be frozen.

Maybe no questions will be asked and maybe the coins won't get confiscated. But maybe they also will. You can't make claims that Hyperliquid doesn't freeze funds and doesn't ask questions when they have done it in the past. Again, if that is acceptable to you, feel free to use them. I would rather look for alternatives where the question of maybe isn't hanging in the air.

The fact is that any exchange can freeze coins by referring to AML rules. That is why it cannot be said that any exchange is safe from that aspect. Usually, the first few transactions, especially the smaller ones, always go through without problems. Only after years of operational business without a single claim for freezing funds, the service can be largely considered safe.

Quote from: apogio on July 27, 2025, 01:16:29 PM

I 've never heard of EUR stablecoins. What are they?

Quote from: Pmalek on August 03, 2025, 06:56:52 AM

Banks are slow in adopting new technologies because they don't like taking those risks. They work with their decades old systems and would rather continue to do so as long as they can. They are also heavily regulated and bringing in something like a bank-native stablecoin would require a lot of work and compliance on their part.

There's a development in this area: ING and 8 other European banks are going to create their own stable coin, working in a new Dutch company under supervision of the Dutch National Bank (DNB). I like the analyses in the Dutch Cryptocast, and indeed, this involved many people within the bank because of compliance. They also said that Tether is the most profitable company on earth per employee, which is no doubt the reason many others are trying to create their own stable coins.
Banks must fear being replaced by tech companies, even though the payment infrastructure in euro countries is quite good. Don't get me wrong, I don't like banks and I don't like the foundation of the euro coin, but when touch my debit card to a machine in a shop and instantly remove it, the payment is processed before I can store the card again. So I don't really see a reason to switch to (euro) stable coins for payments.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 04, 2025, 06:36:36 AM

This is now the first official release that's added the feature.

If a 2.3.0 client connects to a node that hasn't adjusted the relay fee rate, then the minimum limit for the relevant fee slider in Sparrow remains 1 sat/vB, and the 'Create Transaction' button is not activated.

Quote from: satscraper_over_Sparrow2.3.0_connected_to_not_adjusted_node

Thus, to send a transaction with a fee rate less than 1 sat/vB, your client needs to connect to a node that allows the relay of such transactions.

In my case, I have adjusted my own Bitcoin Core v.29.0 node by adding the following entry into the bitcoin.conf file:

Code:

minrelaytxfee=0.00000010

and got the expected result for Sparrow v.2.3.0

Quote from: satscraper_over_Sparrow2.3.0_connected_to_adjusted_node

Quote from: LoyceV on October 05, 2025, 09:37:53 AM

Quote from: Bitcoins101 on October 05, 2025, 09:30:05 AM

If you actually use bitcoin as intended, as a currency, then you are bound to have tainted coins, and it's inevitable that you will have issues with exchanges.
The lack of fungibility is a real problem.

Fungibility is a state of mind Wink

But if Bitcoin would be more like Monero, I'd expect exchanges to ask much more questions than they do now. Or they'll just ban them entirely, like exchanges in EU did with Monero.

Fungibility isn't a state of mind when you can get "scammed" by buying tainted coins.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 06, 2025, 07:01:12 AM

Quote from: bitmover on October 05, 2025, 11:23:11 AM

There are still many good alternatives, where you can simply exchange any btc for stablecoins without kyc/aml. For now, i like to use Hyperliquid but there are many other good ones.

Hyperliquid isn't non-custodial, though. They like to pretend they are. They carry out checks on the coins that get deposited on their exchange. I have read several stories of users who have had their bitcoin frozen on Hyperliquid and simply locked out of their accounts. I considered using them in the past but not anymore. Do an internet search on "can hyperliquid freeze your funds" or something similar and you will see what I am talking about.

Hyperliquid just locking accounts and saying "tough luck" is a serious issue. It would be one thing to just send the funds back to the user and another thing to require further verification. But, it sounds like they just freeze funds and keep them essentially, which I would classify as a scam.