Last update: 2026-08-10_Mon_02.06h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

Pmalek receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Pmalek
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "Pmalek" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 67028377 (unedited backup) (by ryzaadit) (scraped on Mon Aug 10 02:04:19 CEST 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 09, 2026, 07:42:17 AM
Which one would you choose and why?
Le Pharaoh.

Its most common slots are being played, not just by influencers or streamers but also by regular players. Le Pharaoh comparing to Blood & Shadow II & Outsourced, I really think would be more easier than those two slots. The reason, NoLimits is well known as a provider that really drains players money.

But, for player who want to test their luck with "Go Bigs or Go Home".... I really recommend you pick a slot from NoLimits. Maybe Blood & Shadow II cause these slots have a bigger max win compared to Outsourced.



Wings of Horus a bits flop for the design. I don't like it, just to boring.



2. Post 67027929 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 23:25:07 CEST 2026) in Priamex ♻️ FREE raffle #2 welcome round | Prize pool $50, Winner takes all!:

Quote from: Casino Critique on August 04, 2026, 03:38:30 PM
~snip~
 Final SLOTS

1   - hahay
2   -
3   - snowpega
4   - Hypnotizer
5   -
6   - tvplus006
7   -
8   -
9   - ChocolateBitcoinK
10   - xandry
11   -
12   - f150
13   -
14   -
15   - Smartprofit
16   - tiCeR
17   -
18   -
19   - GIF-JOBS
20   -
21   - Pandorak
22   - klarki
23   -
24   - DYING_S0UL
25   -
26   -
27   - Leahized
28   - Pmalek
29   - FinneysTrueVision
30   - Woodie
31   - Ricardo11
32   - LogitechMouse
33   - Yoona_As
34   - Improved
35   -
36   -
37   - viljy
38   - lovesmayfamilis
39   - Ninja Primes
40   - Danydee
41   - brooksby
42   - Mr. Magkaisa
43   -
44   - bitmover
45   - RTX-G53
46   -
47   - mv1986
48   - bitzizzix
49   - inearth
50   - Cointxz

Let's go with the block height number 961776



3. Post 67027801 (unedited backup) (by Cryptomultiplier) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 22:44:37 CEST 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:

Quote from: TopTort777 on Today at 01:50:59 PM
A few days ago, EarnBet asked this question on X, so let's bring it over here to see what the community would rather play.
If you could get 50 free spins on one of the mentioned slots below, which one would you choose and why?

1. Wings of Horus
2. Blood & Shadow II
3. Le Pharaoh
4. Outsourced

I would pick Blood & Shadow II because it looks like the sickest one.



If I was given 50 free spins and would have to choose one slot from the list I would pick Le Pharaoh for sure. The rest slots dont look attractive to me; they are more scary than entertaining. For me scary never equals fun. I dont get people who go to cinemas (for entertainment) to watch horror movies.

However if I got 50 spins for free in other 3 slots, I would use them. I would not go with “scary UI, this game is not for me and other bs”. Anything that is free in gambling is fine with me Cheesy
We share same insight on this one because anything horror or scary is not my panashe and that makes Blood & Shadow II not my best pick but Le Pharaoh, of which has the best mileage per spin on a good day.

Am hardly a slot gambler though but the visuals and soundtrack alone of Le Pharaoh makes me feel entertained and glued to my device and makes me feel like am seeing one of those old movies which was acted in Egypt with the pyramids and pharaoh insignia all over. It definitely gives me a wonderful delight for real and I may not mind spending my free time and funds to buy free spins just to entertain myself even if my intention isn't a jackpot win.




4. Post 67027545 (unedited backup) (by MrGambler531) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 21:27:07 CEST 2026) in ₿ BSpin.io | Bitcoin Casino | Instant deposits | Slots, Games and Lottery:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:15:29 PM
<Snip>
Many online casinos have weekly reload bonuses where you get some bonus money or free spins for depositing on specific days of the week. It doesn't look like BSpin.io has something like that. Judging by their promos page, they only have deposit bonuses for the first three deposits and the promos stop there. There is also weekly cashback and that's it.

Regarding the support going quiet on you. They could have done their job better. That's true.

Yes, I know all of that. And I rejected those automatic deposit bonuses on my first 3 deposits because I didn't want to be attached to some rollover rules.
That is why now I am emailing them to ask for a more personalized bonus.



5. Post 67027339 (unedited backup) (by OsaiEmma) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 20:22:07 CEST 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 08, 2026, 03:40:11 PM
The ColdCard case could be the beginning of something good and so far it's looking like it, maybe from now on the main focus will be 100% on the vulnerabilities on the Blockchain system.
It's always going to be a race between good actors vs bad actors. The Coldcard case has shown that both types exist (as if we didn't know that before). Some people use AI to help them take advantage of vulnerabilities to steal money. Others use it to help discover and correct problems.
This is just hitting the nail on the head. AI can be dangerous and good depending entirely on who is operating it. And besides, before the emergence of AI, there have been automated tools used in different sectors, AI just made the whole process seem effortless and smooth. It's funny seeing forum members saying AI will take over the world lol, the only one taking over the world are the humans behind these AIs.

Well, I'm glad serious losses haven't occurred yet with respect to this BTCpay vulnerability, good one from the red team and every other person who assisted. Even though the coldcard case left a sour taste in our mouth, at least it has significantly improved the security consciousness of these service providers.



6. Post 67026588 (unedited backup) (by TopTort777) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 15:51:01 CEST 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:42:17 AM
A few days ago, EarnBet asked this question on X, so let's bring it over here to see what the community would rather play.
If you could get 50 free spins on one of the mentioned slots below, which one would you choose and why?

1. Wings of Horus
2. Blood & Shadow II
3. Le Pharaoh
4. Outsourced

I would pick Blood & Shadow II because it looks like the sickest one.



If I was given 50 free spins and would have to choose one slot from the list I would pick Le Pharaoh for sure. The rest slots dont look attractive to me; they are more scary than entertaining. For me scary never equals fun. I dont get people who go to cinemas (for entertainment) to watch horror movies.

However if I got 50 spins for free in other 3 slots, I would use them. I would not go with “scary UI, this game is not for me and other bs”. Anything that is free in gambling is fine with me Cheesy



7. Post 67026357 (unedited backup) (by ultrloa) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 14:03:13 CEST 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:

Quote from: julerz12 on Today at 09:15:27 AM
If you could get 50 free spins on one of the mentioned slots below, which one would you choose and why?
I would pick Le Pharaoh. Aside from seeing a familiar face (Smokey) in a slightly different outfit, it usually does have the same mechanics as Le Bandit, plus a couple more up its sleeves, like the 2 choices for the bonus game round: LUCK OF THE PHARAOH and LOST TREASURES. Lost Treasures is usually my go-to choice since it gives 3 refilling lives instead of the common 10 free spins.
During the normal game, the thing that always excites me is the 🌈Rainbow Grin, which turns paying symbols into some coins (🥉bronze, 🥈silver, and 🥇gold), sometimes a pot of gold💰 (collects all paying symbols and redrops them) or even a clover🍀(which further multiplies the paying symbols' value). It also has a higher max multiplier, capped at 15,000x, while Le Bandit is only capped at 10,000x. Of course, bonus buys are available, too, for those with deep pockets.  Wink

Indeed great pick since that game somehow feels like we are playing an upgrade version of the game Le bandit. Having those two type of bonuses make the game less repetitive. Also that Lost treasure that refilling lives thing makes the game more engaging.

Their rainbow is good to highlight because it adds fun on the game especially if we hit that clovers boost and pot of gold.

With having that 15,000 max win, this provably make this game more challenging that's why many people like to play this game.



8. Post 67026260 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 13:13:49 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 08:36:03 AM
snip.... ima nekoliko slobodnih pozicija.
Ovo mi izgleda ko posljedica sig banova Smiley

Kad smo kod toga počeli su neki ljudi koje ne smatram spamerima dobivati banova. Moram to sad ići pogledat pošteno da vidim kriterije Smiley A tako mi je mrsko gubit vrijeme u meti. Već znam šta ću naći, neki novi power strugle i hrpu padobranaca koji iskoriste priliku da gaze po onima koji su pali  Grin

To mi je gadljivo gledati, zato skoro nikad ne posjecujem Metu a jos manje postam tamo...

Bas gledam sig ban listu i prepoznao sam par imena sa BSFL lige koje ne bih nikako svrstao u kategoriju spammera, a i opcenito sam vidio da je (po meni) jos nekoliko clanova dobilo sig ban nezasluzeno...

S druge strane svakako je trebala malo "cvrsca ruka" da rijesi sav spam koji se pise na forumu, jedino je steta da i nevini nastradaju...



9. Post 67025999 (unedited backup) (by julerz12) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 11:15:31 CEST 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:42:17 AM
If you could get 50 free spins on one of the mentioned slots below, which one would you choose and why?
I would pick Le Pharaoh. Aside from seeing a familiar face (Smokey) in a slightly different outfit, it usually does have the same mechanics as Le Bandit, plus a couple more up its sleeves, like the 2 choices for the bonus game round: LUCK OF THE PHARAOH and LOST TREASURES. Lost Treasures is usually my go-to choice since it gives 3 refilling lives instead of the common 10 free spins.
During the normal game, the thing that always excites me is the 🌈Rainbow Grin, which turns paying symbols into some coins (🥉bronze, 🥈silver, and 🥇gold), sometimes a pot of gold💰 (collects all paying symbols and redrops them) or even a clover🍀(which further multiplies the paying symbols' value). It also has a higher max multiplier, capped at 15,000x, while Le Bandit is only capped at 10,000x. Of course, bonus buys are available, too, for those with deep pockets.  Wink



10. Post 67025929 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 10:36:07 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:13:37 AM
snip.... ima nekoliko slobodnih pozicija.
Ovo mi izgleda ko posljedica sig banova Smiley

Kad smo kod toga počeli su neki ljudi koje ne smatram spamerima dobivati banova. Moram to sad ići pogledat pošteno da vidim kriterije Smiley A tako mi je mrsko gubit vrijeme u meti. Već znam šta ću naći, neki novi power strugle i hrpu padobranaca koji iskoriste priliku da gaze po onima koji su pali  Grin



11. Post 67025882 (unedited backup) (by Bitinity) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 10:11:49 CEST 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:42:17 AM
A few days ago, EarnBet asked this question on X, so let's bring it over here to see what the community would rather play.
If you could get 50 free spins on one of the mentioned slots below, which one would you choose and why?

1. Wings of Horus
2. Blood & Shadow II
3. Le Pharaoh
4. Outsourced

I would pick Blood & Shadow II because it looks like the sickest one.

As a slot lover, I've played all the mentioned games with regular spins as well as bonus buys. These games are considered as extreme volatility games especially the 2 by NLC (Blood $ Shadow II and Outsourced). If I have to choose 1 among these 4, I'll go with the one of the games by Hacksaw (Le Pharaoh or Wing of Horuz). The reason is simple because it will be for 50FS only so I have to choose the one with better RTP than others. Special case for games from NolimitCity, there are always 3 options of RTP that can be selected by casino. They are: Regular RTP, DX1, and DX2. If the game is using the regular RTP, it is still good to play but if it is using DX1 or DX2, I will not even touch it  Cheesy For example on the Outsourced, the standard or regular RTP is 96.08% while the DX1 is 94.08% and DX2 is 92.06%.



12. Post 67024351 (unedited backup) (by 348Judah) (scraped on Sat Aug 8 20:16:13 CEST 2026) in 🚀 Kikabet.com 👑 $100,000 Weekly Race 🔥 Daily Cashback up to 30%:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:50:46 PM
An Inter win at odds of around 2.30 were a great deal even if it's a pre-season friendly. Inter is sadly a better team than Juventus.

Juventus really proved the have the strength to Battle against Inter,, but upon all their attempts, they still got defeated by inter with two goals against one, no one would have believe Juventus could play in such manner and as well inter, but just as expected, inter score 2 goals and this was how they both ended the match, sometimes football could be surprising and can also come in a different way from what we expect, we are to catch the fun from either conditions that applies.



13. Post 67022780 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Aug 8 10:39:49 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 14973 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 10058 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4750 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 9928 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8907 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2164 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6266 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2173 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1949 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 13785 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6909 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4443 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3963 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11398 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 12043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 534 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2869 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4661 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (62) 21386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6660 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2126 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3878 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1360 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3660 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1313 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6889 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2328 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3605 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 13185 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1482 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2102 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10096 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2643 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3620 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11374 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 21130 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2981 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2601 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5754 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1606 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1901 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1609 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1885 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1604 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 946 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3599 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1020 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8826 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust:  neutral) (467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)



14. Post 67022740 (unedited backup) (by Die_empty) (scraped on Sat Aug 8 10:16:07 CEST 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 07, 2026, 04:50:54 PM
BTCPay Server thanks the Bitcoin Red Team for discovering and reporting the vulnerability and suggest the following:
In this thread What's your take on this moment?, we discussed Bitcoin Red Team. Some members didn't see anything special about how they selflessly reviewed many core Bitcoin projects after the Coldcard problem. But I am happy to see that their discovery and report have helped BTCPay Server avoid what would have been another disaster. 

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:59:46 AM
I haven't seen any evidence so far that this BTCPay Server vulnerability was exploited by AI.
I doubt you will, but I am pretty sure it was done with AI. After the Coldcard hack, we have had multiple projects announcing disruptions or shutdowns of service and all that is happening in a shot space of time. That tells you that there is something new on the market, making it easier to find exploits and bugs.
With the rate at which AI is discovering flaws in crypto projects recently, it is not wrong to assume that AI is involved in this one. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8 was used to find a four-year-old Zcash vulnerability that could have allowed attackers to create unlimited counterfeit ZEC. It was announced that the Coldcard attackers used AI to find a firmware flaw, and Boltz suspended its service after they discovered that AI-assisted attacks were finding vulnerabilities faster than its team could address them.


https://tech.yahoo.com/cybersecurity/articles/bitcoin-payment-btcpay-warns-critical-200034427.html



15. Post 67022687 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Aug 8 09:53:43 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):

Weekly update (2026-07-31_Fri_05.18h)


theymos' raw data (format: time    amount    msg    user_from    user_to)
Sample
Code:
1785466314 1 5589898.msg66995781 2836461 3442536
1785464633 1 5568613.msg66995772 2658890 112493
1785461787 1 5589927.msg66995578 84521 52782
1785461780 3 5589927.msg66996295 84521 2739424
1785460887 1 5156376.msg66901933 3421100 3739266
1785460878 1 5156376.msg66916114 3421100 1024933
1785460869 1 5156376.msg66916318 3421100 3746445
1785460852 1 5156376.msg66945870 3421100 3704193
1785460844 1 5156376.msg66978907 3421100 3714097
1785460834 1 5156376.msg66983113 3421100 3757223
1785460827 1 5156376.msg66988300 3421100 3745143
1785460819 1 5156376.msg66996159 3421100 1217918
1785460153 1 178336.msg66996153 198573 33156
1785459166 1 5589903.msg66995793 950662 783422
1785458723 1 5571375.msg66995889 1554927 1852120
1785458320 1 5589903.msg66996217 950662 523235
1785458287 2 178336.msg66996153 317618 33156
1785458252 2 5589032.msg66965839 85033 941526
1785457587 1 5586897.msg66879902 950662 1711698
1785457429 1 178336.msg66996153 430390 33156
1785456924 1 5589754.msg66995113 961598 839568
1785456526 1 5589763.msg66994989 950662 926962
1785456457 1 5539197.msg66996176 97582 846936
1785456004 1 5589913.msg66995179 97582 3575638
1785455961 1 5589913.msg66995094 97582 1031572
1785455931 2 5589750.msg66989772 1021018 557798
1785455929 1 5589763.msg66993882 317618 1982152
1785455841 1 5476162.msg66525919 33156 941526
1785455841 1 5589750.msg66989772 1021018 557798
1785455776 2 5589943.msg66996120 97582 846936
1785455688 1 5589885.msg66996143 317618 1269497
1785455563 2 5589944.msg66996135 97582 1021018
1785455554 2 5243405.msg54295426 97582 1292764
1785455261 1 5156376.msg66892886 1217918 3449242
1785455189 1 5589497.msg66992896 938833 961598
1785455184 1 5156376.msg66945870 1217918 3704193
1785455013 3 5379847.msg66899483 1852120 1237522
1785455009 1 5589694.msg66987650 33156 1190631
1785455006 1 5589694.msg66987646 33156 1137579
1785455004 1 5589694.msg66987613 33156 772177
1785455001 1 178336.msg66987620 33156 533583
1785454999 1 5589699.msg66988123 33156 459836
1785454996 1 178336.msg66994141 33156 533583
1785454994 1 5588886.msg66993813 33156 550315
1785454991 1 5588886.msg66993611 33156 353637
1785454961 3 5379847.msg66895539 1852120 65636
1785454930 5 5379847.msg66895525 1852120 140582
1785454928 1 5589240.msg66993857 85033 2773722
1785454909 5 5379847.msg66895515 1852120 140582
1785454901 3 5379847.msg66888335 1852120 3751114
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2295 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 31 Jul 2026 04:51:54 AM CEST, Free Market Capitalist (history) sent 1 Merit to AHOYBRAUSE (history) for Re: Zazangs312 scammer.
On Fri 31 Jul 2026 04:23:53 AM CEST, Rikafip (history) sent 1 Merit to Pmalek (history) for Re: Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [Last update 3.7.2026.].
On Fri 31 Jul 2026 03:36:27 AM CEST, Welsh (history) sent 1 Merit to flatfly (history) for Large-scale Coldcard compromise (1082.65 BTC stolen so far) .
On Fri 31 Jul 2026 03:36:20 AM CEST, Welsh (history) sent 3 Merit to NotATether (history) for Re: Large-scale compromise, possibly affecting coldcard (600 BTC stolen so far) .
On Fri 31 Jul 2026 03:21:27 AM CEST, Silence Scream (history) sent 1 Merit to NyktersteinMD (history) for Re: Vispilio'nun Tam Ba&#287;&#305;ms&#305;z &#128293; Merit Cafe'si &#128293;.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking &amp; discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (605 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8826 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 935 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3763276: MegRewards (history) earned: 4 Merit.
3763338: omenswap (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3763404: Rmun1217 (history) earned: 3 Merit.
3763611: Hazebet.co (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3763895: Papa_Mojet (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample
Code:
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3760817: lastpixellive
3760902: borrowonbitcoin
3760961: Ethereum1
3761001: buffetto
3761071: Droppies
3761141: paidfully
3761153: mickpaoli
3761170: Soulistic
3761181: nadanada_me
3761237: IsItMiCACompliant
3761238: xmrbro
3761264: GHOTO11
3761348: Gmax98005
3761385: shaketank
3761497: niso23
3761513: Casper7
3761530: Priamex.com
3761538: Benedesuuuk
3761595: Khaleedmaine
3761676: Lytvynets1
3761774: scoorched
3761866: Otomato
3761923: Korvane.io
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw
3762146: Cinexa
3762178: Bamskki
3762182: Aliikhanii
3762184: xiaoyu1222006
3762229: lattica-core
3762275: DigitalDonkeyBlocks
3762314: apide01
3762360: Midisk
3762435: exWhale
3762536: DurakCrypto
3762577: Sowat
3762578: sidrabtc
3762721: Fire_man
3762844: monerica
3762860: PolarCrypto
3762899: Akos26
3763135: Geould
3763168: jaxx.bet
3763248: xxxmourn
3763270: swapsslol
3763276: MegRewards
3763338: omenswap
3763404: Rmun1217
3763611: Hazebet.co
3763895: Papa_Mojet
Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample
Code:
0:569:0
3:0:8826
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:1
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14470:14973
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1492
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3760817:0:5
3760902:0:3
3760961:0:2
3761001:0:2
3761071:0:2
3761141:0:1
3761153:0:1
3761170:2:8
3761181:0:3
3761237:0:3
3761238:0:5
3761264:0:1
3761348:0:1
3761385:0:1
3761497:0:38
3761513:0:2
3761530:0:11
3761538:7:15
3761595:1:7
3761676:0:2
3761774:0:1
3761866:0:1
3761923:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1
3762146:0:12
3762178:0:8
3762182:0:1
3762184:0:1
3762229:0:1
3762275:0:2
3762314:0:3
3762360:0:1
3762435:0:1
3762536:0:2
3762577:0:1
3762578:0:1
3762721:0:1
3762844:0:2
3762860:0:9
3762899:0:1
3763135:0:2
3763168:0:1
3763248:0:1
3763270:0:1
3763276:0:4
3763338:0:1
3763404:0:3
3763611:0:1
3763895:0:1
Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51635
Sample
Code:
     1. 21386 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1120 unique users in 12389 transactions
     2. 21130 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 768 unique users in 11561 transactions
     3. 18897 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9988 transactions
     4. 15618 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8963 transactions
     5. 14973 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1230 unique users in 5426 transactions
     6. 13785 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 733 unique users in 9085 transactions
     7. 13185 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 611 unique users in 4927 transactions
     8. 12043 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 503 unique users in 6628 transactions
     9. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
    10. 11911 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 529 unique users in 6110 transactions
    11. 11398 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 614 unique users in 6637 transactions
    12. 11374 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6472 transactions
    13. 11302 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 587 unique users in 6493 transactions
    14. 10541 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 671 unique users in 5686 transactions
    15. 10435 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5333 transactions
    16. 10321 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 565 unique users in 4588 transactions
    17. 10096 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 405 unique users in 3510 transactions
    18. 10058 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 343 unique users in 3704 transactions
    19. 9958 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 470 unique users in 4985 transactions
    20. 9957 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 538 unique users in 4583 transactions
    21. 9928 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 456 unique users in 5427 transactions
    22. 9252 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 5003 transactions
    23. 8927 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 411 unique users in 4608 transactions
    24. 8907 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 585 unique users in 5277 transactions
    25. 8826 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 412 unique users in 934 transactions
    26. 8776 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 456 unique users in 5200 transactions
    27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
    28. 8224 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 462 unique users in 4506 transactions
    29. 7648 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 593 unique users in 4542 transactions
    30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
    31. 7348 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4221 transactions
    32. 7262 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1869 transactions
    33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
    34. 6965 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 229 unique users in 3988 transactions
    35. 6909 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3507 transactions
    36. 6889 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 403 unique users in 3789 transactions
    37. 6793 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 347 unique users in 3195 transactions
    38. 6776 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3042 transactions
    39. 6748 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 957 unique users in 4390 transactions
    40. 6729 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 493 unique users in 3739 transactions
    41. 6660 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 529 unique users in 3845 transactions
    42. 6507 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 206 unique users in 3765 transactions
    43. 6489 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 431 unique users in 3551 transactions
    44. 6464 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 436 unique users in 3776 transactions
    45. 6365 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 626 unique users in 3584 transactions
    46. 6270 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3494 transactions
    47. 6266 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3644 transactions
    48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
    49. 5760 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2730 transactions
    50. 5754 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 460 unique users in 4046 transactions
.......
.......
.......
 51586. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51587. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51588. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51589. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51590. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51591. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51592. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51593. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51594. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51595. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51596. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51597. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51598. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51599. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51600. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51601. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51602. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51603. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51604. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51605. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51606. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51607. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51608. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51609. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51610. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51611. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51612. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51613. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51614. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51615. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51616. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51617. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51618. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51619. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51620. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51621. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51622. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51623. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51624. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51625. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51626. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51627. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51628. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51629. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51630. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51631. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51632. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51633. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51634. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 51635. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26721
Sample
Code:
     1. 77138 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 912 unique users in 13087 transactions
     2. 71780 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2299 unique users in 31396 transactions
     3. 69105 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3348 unique users in 18086 transactions
     4. 62427 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3659 unique users in 60185 transactions
     5. 60361 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4733 unique users in 34565 transactions
     6. 53949 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3789 unique users in 37233 transactions
     7. 45499 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2928 unique users in 16114 transactions
     8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
     9. 39151 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2543 unique users in 14532 transactions
    10. 38335 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2964 unique users in 31053 transactions
    11. 35752 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1598 unique users in 14199 transactions
    12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
    13. 33309 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2198 unique users in 11401 transactions
    14. 32837 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1494 unique users in 10459 transactions
    15. 29887 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1465 unique users in 7829 transactions
    16. 29347 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1740 unique users in 6878 transactions
    17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
    18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
    19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
    20. 23378 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1390 unique users in 9565 transactions
    21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
    22. 18287 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1789 unique users in 4118 transactions
    23. 17077 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 568 unique users in 8031 transactions
    24. 16849 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 754 unique users in 6275 transactions
    25. 16651 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1753 unique users in 7621 transactions
    26. 16480 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1203 unique users in 9392 transactions
    27. 16250 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2006 unique users in 6606 transactions
    28. 15303 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 643 unique users in 5495 transactions
    29. 15128 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1332 unique users in 8510 transactions
    30. 14643 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1693 unique users in 7652 transactions
    31. 14470 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1109 unique users in 1778 transactions
    32. 14428 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3164 unique users in 7565 transactions
    33. 13635 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 666 unique users in 3644 transactions
    34. 13513 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1157 unique users in 8263 transactions
    35. 13505 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1363 unique users in 7478 transactions
    36. 13434 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6301 transactions
    37. 13393 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5907 transactions
    38. 13244 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 850 unique users in 4301 transactions
    39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
    40. 12025 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1201 unique users in 6563 transactions
    41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
    42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
    43. 8712 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 586 unique users in 7426 transactions
    44. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
    45. 8583 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1064 unique users in 3724 transactions
    46. 8579 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 760 unique users in 7416 transactions
    47. 8498 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 525 unique users in 6701 transactions
    48. 8413 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 333 unique users in 3389 transactions
    49. 8230 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 961 unique users in 3593 transactions
    50. 8148 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 674 unique users in 2522 transactions
.......
.......
.......
 26672. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26673. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26674. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26675. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26676. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26677. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26678. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26679. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26680. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26681. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26682. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26683. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26684. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26685. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26686. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26687. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26688. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26689. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26690. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26691. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26692. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26693. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26694. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26695. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26696. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26697. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26698. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26699. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26700. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26701. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26702. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26703. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26704. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26705. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26706. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26707. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26708. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26709. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26710. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26711. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26712. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26713. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26714. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26715. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26716. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26717. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26718. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26719. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26720. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26721. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 340440 (14.38%)
Tuesday 339905 (14.36%)
Wednesday 339722 (14.35%)
Thursday 360427 (15.23%)
Friday 357884 (15.12%)
Saturday 311513 (13.16%)
Sunday 315937 (13.35%)
Total: 2365828


* This file will be overwritten by newer versions



16. Post 67022543 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Sat Aug 8 08:45:07 CEST 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 07, 2026, 04:50:54 PM
Update:

BTCPay Server thanks the Bitcoin Red Team for discovering and reporting the vulnerability and suggest the following:

Quote
To stay safe, make sure that even after the update, you:
- Completely refresh macaroons and macaroons.db
- Completely refresh auth strings for other LN backends
- If you generated a hot on-chain wallet in BTCPay, you want to move those funds and recreate the wallet
https://x.com/BtcpayServer/status/2085771939008667869

It's good to see they acknowledged Bitcoin Red Team, it seems i was worried too much about the team finding.


Quote from: Odohu on August 07, 2026, 06:32:25 PM
I really do not feel at ease when I see  with open source system because they were supposed to be rhe safest means of storing Bitcoin.

People who claim open-source wallet as safest probably generalize too much. I mostly agree with such statement only when such wallet is popular and have been around for some time. Even considering recent known vulnerability on open-source/source-code available wallet, IMO using closed source wallet isn't good alternative either, unless you deeply trust whoever create and maintain it.



17. Post 67021422 (unedited backup) (by Lillominato89) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 21:51:37 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: katanic97 on Today at 03:12:52 PM
I don’t think Juventus will let J. David go.
Last season they signed him as the solution to their attacking problems, and I’m convinced they still hold that view.
In reality, however, the player hasn’t really lived up to his potential – could he do so this year? Perhaps, because by now he should have settled in. It won’t be easy to sell him either, unless there are buyers willing to take him on.
Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, though. With Kolo Muani at the club now, it doesn't look like David will be a starter. And if they bring in a similar attacker like David, his playing time will be greatly limited. Jonathan is a great opportunity to score some valuable capital gains points. He came to Juventus last season on a free transfer and if a good offer were to arrive, I think they would sell him. As you said, he hasn't live up to the hype.

Juventus has a lot of strikers and lately in the last couple of seasons they have been getting them a lot. All these strikers didnt do much,the only guy who did something was Vlahovic and even he didnt score much. If they could sell David they will probobly do it. Juventus is currently missing a striker that can score a lot of goals,because currently from what they are having is not enough and they arent good enough at all.

Sometimes Vlahovic was good too, you said that well. Now Kolo Muani has come back again and we'll see if he can do something once more... I remember when Juventus had Mandzukic, Tevez, Vucinic, and many other great strikers. Now, changes are necessary and Juventus needs to get back to its old ways.

Vlahovic is a different matter altogether; he’s now at loggerheads with the board, and the board would be only too happy to sell him or let him leave because his wages are sky-high and he’s not delivering as much as the board had hoped!
Of course, with Kolo Muani’s arrival, someone has to make way

It's been like that for a long time. It's obvious that he's not happy with the salary he's gets either. Unfortunately, I was hoping he'd be in good form. Honestly, he hasn't shown much for the Serbian national team either, but somehow i know he has talent and that this poor form is only temporary. I hope he'll find a club where he'll play well again

I don’t think he’s unhappy with the salary he’s on! 13 million a year in Serie A is an enormous sum! In fact, he’s the highest-paid player in Serie A, yet he performs less well than Inter’s Bonny, who earns 12 times less.

He’d be better off at a club like Como or Atalanta, where he’d be the first-choice striker and the whole team would play around him.

But it’s unlikely he’d accept a move to a club like Como at this stage.



18. Post 67021247 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 20:41:55 CEST 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on Today at 05:01:19 PM
My guess is that this is another open-source project that's being targeted with the help of AI.

I don't think it's fair to blame AI for every attack on any open source project.

I haven't seen any evidence so far that this BTCPay Server vulnerability was exploited by AI.

You know, any popular open source software is regularly analyzed by security researcher also by attacker.

When any critical bug is discovered, it's an unfortunate reality that attempt to exploit it before or after a patch is released.

Every decent developer uses AI now.

Ofc the AI didnt find the vulnerability alone. But the AI enhances the developer/hacker capabilities

So yeah  , AI is to blame for all those attacks to be happening simultaneously or in a small amount of time



19. Post 67021145 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 20:03:31 CEST 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on Today at 05:01:19 PM
My guess is that this is another open-source project that's being targeted with the help of AI.
I don't think it's fair to blame AI for every attack on any open source project.
It is really not fair until it is proven, but ever since AI came out and has continued to improve, especially with models like Claude, which are very advanced and game-changing, hacks have also been increasing.

Of course, no one is talking about this, but this is something that cannot be ignored. Self-testing by these companies has also shown that AI is capable of a lot of things, and it has already been used to find a lot of vulnerabilities. For example, Chinese-sponsored hackers used Claude to break into at least 30 organizations. Claude was also used by a person to find his seed phrase, which was not a hack, but it helped with extortion, real data theft as well. Many hackers have used it to find vulnerabilities in healthcare, emergency services, and other governmental departments to gain access to the people's stored data, which they sell online or use to extort people later.

A hacker used AI to create ransomware that he later sold online to criminals, so with the help of AI, one can solve one problem, which can then help them break into another system, eventually leading to even more serious consequences. That's why I won't disagree with pmalek, as AI is capable of a lot of things. You must have heard they blamed it all on Claude when they bombed the Iranian schoolgirl.



20. Post 67021007 (unedited backup) (by Gost ms) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 19:04:55 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: bastisisca on Today at 12:47:29 PM
I thought the smiley I placed at the end of my post would be enough for everyone to know that I was joking and being sarcastic. Apparently it wasn't.

Unfortunately Jonathan David is a player with mediocre qualities, but not excellent ones. At Lille he did great things because in a league that allows you to do better. In Serie A, where the teams are more defensive, you have to be able to demonstrate that you can move faster. And David has precisely this lack that prevents him from coming out in Serie A.

David's performance was much worse than expected and many dreams were made about him, in the beginning, David was getting that much but gradually David lost his performance. If he cannot change himself very quickly at this moment, then maybe a very bad situation is waiting for David in the future. The reason behind David's poor performance cannot be said yet, but the possible problems that exist need to be overcome quickly. If there is any problem like adapting to the new team or not being able to handle the extra pressure, then these problems need to be solved very quickly.



21. Post 67020994 (unedited backup) (by Swordsoffreedom) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 19:01:19 CEST 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:50:54 PM
Users of BTCPay Server must know that there is a critical vulnerability in this payment processor right now. It is being exploited by scammers and can lead to the loss of funds.
The developers recommend that all users update to version 2.4.2 as soon as possible. If that's not possible at the moment the alternative is to turn off your BTCPay Server until you can safely upgrade. Spread the word if you know someone that uses BTCPay Server.

My guess is that this is another open-source project that's being targeted with the help of AI.


https://x.com/BtcpayServer/status/2085755643659522240

I don't think it's fair to blame AI for every attack on any open source project.

I haven't seen any evidence so far that this BTCPay Server vulnerability was exploited by AI.

You know, any popular open source software is regularly analyzed by security researcher also by attacker.

When any critical bug is discovered, it's an unfortunate reality that attempt to exploit it before or after a patch is released.



22. Post 67020669 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 17:12:55 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Lillominato89 on August 06, 2026, 06:09:31 PM
I don’t think Juventus will let J. David go.
Last season they signed him as the solution to their attacking problems, and I’m convinced they still hold that view.
In reality, however, the player hasn’t really lived up to his potential – could he do so this year? Perhaps, because by now he should have settled in. It won’t be easy to sell him either, unless there are buyers willing to take him on.
Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, though. With Kolo Muani at the club now, it doesn't look like David will be a starter. And if they bring in a similar attacker like David, his playing time will be greatly limited. Jonathan is a great opportunity to score some valuable capital gains points. He came to Juventus last season on a free transfer and if a good offer were to arrive, I think they would sell him. As you said, he hasn't live up to the hype.

Juventus has a lot of strikers and lately in the last couple of seasons they have been getting them a lot. All these strikers didnt do much,the only guy who did something was Vlahovic and even he didnt score much. If they could sell David they will probobly do it. Juventus is currently missing a striker that can score a lot of goals,because currently from what they are having is not enough and they arent good enough at all.

Sometimes Vlahovic was good too, you said that well. Now Kolo Muani has come back again and we'll see if he can do something once more... I remember when Juventus had Mandzukic, Tevez, Vucinic, and many other great strikers. Now, changes are necessary and Juventus needs to get back to its old ways.

Vlahovic is a different matter altogether; he’s now at loggerheads with the board, and the board would be only too happy to sell him or let him leave because his wages are sky-high and he’s not delivering as much as the board had hoped!
Of course, with Kolo Muani’s arrival, someone has to make way

It's been like that for a long time. It's obvious that he's not happy with the salary he's gets either. Unfortunately, I was hoping he'd be in good form. Honestly, he hasn't shown much for the Serbian national team either, but somehow i know he has talent and that this poor form is only temporary. I hope he'll find a club where he'll play well again



23. Post 67020607 (unedited backup) (by Frankolala) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 16:52:37 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: bastisisca on Today at 12:47:29 PM
I thought the smiley I placed at the end of my post would be enough for everyone to know that I was joking and being sarcastic. Apparently it wasn't.

Unfortunately Jonathan David is a player with mediocre qualities, but not excellent ones. At Lille he did great things because in a league that allows you to do better. In Serie A, where the teams are more defensive, you have to be able to demonstrate that you can move faster. And David has precisely this lack that prevents him from coming out in Serie A.
That's the challenge in Seria A. If you're a striker, much work needs to be done in order for you to penetrate your opponent defense since, they're playing a defensive game. This is why you see that Seria A doesn't have much goals scored in total at the end of the league compared to other big leagues. David should improve his pace.



24. Post 67020512 (unedited backup) (by snowpega) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 16:13:43 CEST 2026) in [ANN Preview] Lock.com: a split- architecture wallet for safer self-custody :

Quote from: Pmalek on August 05, 2026, 03:37:05 PM
Keep in mind that Bitcoin and its blockchain aren't quantum-safe. The network would have to undergo a hard fork to migrate away from legacy signatures. Who knows how long that's going to take and when it will be needed. Lock uses a combination of traditional, non-quantum-safe cryptography and a quantum-safe system. I don't have the technical know-how to comment on how that would work on a blockchain that itself isn't protected against the worst-case scenario and what would happen to Lock in case a quantum attack happened.

Yeah, you are correct, as this is a very concerning and important matter these days.
Because we, as its adopters, fear what would happen if a quantum computer damages/attack its network in any way.
At the same time, if we think about it from another perspective, we know that every technology has its pros and cons.

So what if this technology is used to make it safe from bad actors to protect it rather than damaging it in any way?
The meaning of this is that it will depend on the situation and what kind of people/person is using this technology.
This will decide whether quantum computing is a technology against this asset or supports it.

Other than this, what I think is that, as adoption of Bitcoin is increasing day by day, and now it has reached the international level where we have seen it also has been added to some countries' strategic reserves, e.g., the US. So I don't think countries like these or big powers will ever let this happen. Because if this happens, it will also damage them, which can impact their economy, right? CMIIW!



25. Post 67020390 (unedited backup) (by Mustang Shelby) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 15:26:37 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: bastisisca on Today at 12:47:29 PM
I thought the smiley I placed at the end of my post would be enough for everyone to know that I was joking and being sarcastic. Apparently it wasn't.

Unfortunately Jonathan David is a player with mediocre qualities, but not excellent ones. At Lille he did great things because in a league that allows you to do better. In Serie A, where the teams are more defensive, you have to be able to demonstrate that you can move faster. And David has precisely this lack that prevents him from coming out in Serie A.
David's performance at Juventus was very poor. Juventus has been unable to get the desired performance from the strikers they've recently signed. Currently, Juventus' most pressing need is a striker. Without wingers, Juventus can't score goals. This was perhaps one of the main reasons for their decline in performance last year. Juventus needs a very good, clinical striker. Perhaps they should spend a lot of money on this, because the other players in the squad aren't bad. However, without a clinical striker, you can't achieve better performance.



26. Post 67020271 (unedited backup) (by bastisisca) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 14:47:31 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on August 06, 2026, 01:59:36 PM
I thought the smiley I placed at the end of my post would be enough for everyone to know that I was joking and being sarcastic. Apparently it wasn't.

Unfortunately Jonathan David is a player with mediocre qualities, but not excellent ones. At Lille he did great things because in a league that allows you to do better. In Serie A, where the teams are more defensive, you have to be able to demonstrate that you can move faster. And David has precisely this lack that prevents him from coming out in Serie A.



27. Post 67019762 (unedited backup) (by Numan467) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 11:17:43 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :

Quote from: ABCbits on Today at 08:08:23 AM
Bitcoin Red Team consists of 16 people who are working around the clock now and running security audits on Bitcoin code bases. According to their report, they have already made close to 5,000 findings and discovered what they believe are 85 critical and 635 high severity issues. They report these issues back to project owners and companies, and I think that's a great thing that has come out of this terrible situation. Whitehats and industry experts joining forces to help secure the wider Bitcoin ecosystem.

https://xcancel.com/callebtc/status/2085024458012586286

I have mixed thought about it. I can see OpenSats actually fund this person[1] and AFAIK OpenSats generally fund promising person and project. But i also worry about quality/accuracy of their finding. "27.5 hours in, we've filed 4,962 findings across 390 projects" from 16 people and some AI sounds too high/fast. Either way, we'll know how accurate are their findings, by at release note of wallet and other cryptocurrency software/library in few next months.

[1] https://opensats.org/blog/cashu-calle-receives-lts-grant
It was the numbers that caught my attention. Almost 5,000 results on 390 projects in less than a day is pretty cool, but also makes me wonder how much hand checking was done. While AI can scan code very quickly, proof that it is indeed serious flaw usually takes a lot longer.
That is why I agree with @ABCbits about waiting before judging the results. Project added value if wallet developers begin to fix bugs from these reports. However, if most of reports turn out to be wrong alarms, then developers may spend much of time working on reports other than working on real safety flaws. While it is good news that OpenSats is supporting the project, the amount of the results will be more important than the amount.



28. Post 67019597 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 10:08:25 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :

Quote from: Pmalek on August 06, 2026, 03:35:05 PM
Bitcoin Red Team consists of 16 people who are working around the clock now and running security audits on Bitcoin code bases. According to their report, they have already made close to 5,000 findings and discovered what they believe are 85 critical and 635 high severity issues. They report these issues back to project owners and companies, and I think that's a great thing that has come out of this terrible situation. Whitehats and industry experts joining forces to help secure the wider Bitcoin ecosystem.

https://xcancel.com/callebtc/status/2085024458012586286

I have mixed thought about it. I can see OpenSats actually fund this person[1] and AFAIK OpenSats generally fund promising person and project. But i also worry about quality/accuracy of their finding. "27.5 hours in, we've filed 4,962 findings across 390 projects" from 16 people and some AI sounds too high/fast. Either way, we'll know how accurate are their findings, by at release note of wallet and other cryptocurrency software/library in few next months.

[1] https://opensats.org/blog/cashu-calle-receives-lts-grant



29. Post 67018873 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 00:48:49 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:35:05 PM
Bitcoin Red Team consists of 16 people who are working around the clock now and running security audits on Bitcoin code bases. According to their report, they have already made close to 5,000 findings and discovered what they believe are 85 critical and 635 high severity issues. They report these issues back to project owners and companies, and I think that's a great thing that has come out of this terrible situation. Whitehats and industry experts joining forces to help secure the wider Bitcoin ecosystem.

https://xcancel.com/callebtc/status/2085024458012586286
Bitcoin code is safe.
The most audited code in the world has been under constant scrutiny by the best minds since 16 years.
The code is arguably kept simple just to avoid any hidden bug or negative feature.
Interacting with this code requires using many more codes: wallets, signing devices, cryptographic libraries, exchanges....
Those software are not secure, and prone to AI-driven exploit.



30. Post 67018764 (unedited backup) (by KingsDen) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 00:14:49 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:23:43 PM
Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, though. With Kolo Muani at the club now, it doesn't look like David will be a starter. And if they bring in a similar attacker like David, his playing time will be greatly limited. Jonathan is a great opportunity to score some valuable capital gains points. He came to Juventus last season on a free transfer and if a good offer were to arrive, I think they would sell him. As you said, he hasn't live up to the hype.
Looking at the stats of both strikers last season, they really didn't score much goals, they seem to be at the same level according to stats. Jonathan David didn't perform as expected for Juventus, and I will suggest they sell him  and bring in a proper striker. Juventus lacks a decent striker, although Vlahaovic is there, but he is not very fit, he suffered injury last season which is making him decline.

There are rumours that Juventus wants Alexander Sorloth, I think he will be the solution to this problem.



31. Post 67017972 (unedited backup) (by Lillominato89) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 20:09:31 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: katanic97 on Today at 05:28:57 PM
I don’t think Juventus will let J. David go.
Last season they signed him as the solution to their attacking problems, and I’m convinced they still hold that view.
In reality, however, the player hasn’t really lived up to his potential – could he do so this year? Perhaps, because by now he should have settled in. It won’t be easy to sell him either, unless there are buyers willing to take him on.
Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, though. With Kolo Muani at the club now, it doesn't look like David will be a starter. And if they bring in a similar attacker like David, his playing time will be greatly limited. Jonathan is a great opportunity to score some valuable capital gains points. He came to Juventus last season on a free transfer and if a good offer were to arrive, I think they would sell him. As you said, he hasn't live up to the hype.

Juventus has a lot of strikers and lately in the last couple of seasons they have been getting them a lot. All these strikers didnt do much,the only guy who did something was Vlahovic and even he didnt score much. If they could sell David they will probobly do it. Juventus is currently missing a striker that can score a lot of goals,because currently from what they are having is not enough and they arent good enough at all.

Sometimes Vlahovic was good too, you said that well. Now Kolo Muani has come back again and we'll see if he can do something once more... I remember when Juventus had Mandzukic, Tevez, Vucinic, and many other great strikers. Now, changes are necessary and Juventus needs to get back to its old ways.

Vlahovic is a different matter altogether; he’s now at loggerheads with the board, and the board would be only too happy to sell him or let him leave because his wages are sky-high and he’s not delivering as much as the board had hoped!
Of course, with Kolo Muani’s arrival, someone has to make way



32. Post 67017844 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 19:29:01 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Joca97 on Today at 03:28:50 PM
I don’t think Juventus will let J. David go.
Last season they signed him as the solution to their attacking problems, and I’m convinced they still hold that view.
In reality, however, the player hasn’t really lived up to his potential – could he do so this year? Perhaps, because by now he should have settled in. It won’t be easy to sell him either, unless there are buyers willing to take him on.
Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, though. With Kolo Muani at the club now, it doesn't look like David will be a starter. And if they bring in a similar attacker like David, his playing time will be greatly limited. Jonathan is a great opportunity to score some valuable capital gains points. He came to Juventus last season on a free transfer and if a good offer were to arrive, I think they would sell him. As you said, he hasn't live up to the hype.

Juventus has a lot of strikers and lately in the last couple of seasons they have been getting them a lot. All these strikers didnt do much,the only guy who did something was Vlahovic and even he didnt score much. If they could sell David they will probobly do it. Juventus is currently missing a striker that can score a lot of goals,because currently from what they are having is not enough and they arent good enough at all.

Sometimes Vlahovic was good too, you said that well. Now Kolo Muani has come back again and we'll see if he can do something once more... I remember when Juventus had Mandzukic, Tevez, Vucinic, and many other great strikers. Now, changes are necessary and Juventus needs to get back to its old ways.



33. Post 67017677 (unedited backup) (by panjul07) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 18:28:37 CEST 2026) in Loyalty Bonuses & Promotions on Crypto Casinos and Sportsbooks:

Hey mate, I think its been so long you have not updated the list, I know you are going to make an update as what you said in Pmalek's thread days ago.
Just for your information, there are some casinos on the list that are no longer accessible so you can double check.
I'm experiencing error when accessing Betchain and Starbets, while Playbitcoingames is on domain's sale, then Luckydiamond is closing down.
Btc365 is showing under maintenance, not quite sure if it is happening recently or its been a while because their official ANN thread is also no longer active.







34. Post 67017503 (unedited backup) (by Joca97) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 17:28:55 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:23:43 PM
I don’t think Juventus will let J. David go.
Last season they signed him as the solution to their attacking problems, and I’m convinced they still hold that view.
In reality, however, the player hasn’t really lived up to his potential – could he do so this year? Perhaps, because by now he should have settled in. It won’t be easy to sell him either, unless there are buyers willing to take him on.
Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, though. With Kolo Muani at the club now, it doesn't look like David will be a starter. And if they bring in a similar attacker like David, his playing time will be greatly limited. Jonathan is a great opportunity to score some valuable capital gains points. He came to Juventus last season on a free transfer and if a good offer were to arrive, I think they would sell him. As you said, he hasn't live up to the hype.

Juventus has a lot of strikers and lately in the last couple of seasons they have been getting them a lot. All these strikers didnt do much,the only guy who did something was Vlahovic and even he didnt score much. If they could sell David they will probobly do it. Juventus is currently missing a striker that can score a lot of goals,because currently from what they are having is not enough and they arent good enough at all.



35. Post 67017211 (unedited backup) (by darxiaomi) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 15:56:43 CEST 2026) in [ANN Preview] Lock.com: a split- architecture wallet for safer self-custody :

Quote from: Pmalek on August 05, 2026, 03:37:05 PM
I like the concept of start to paying attention to the quantum computer from now and already closing the discussion about it since we alread have the tools to prevent any problem in the future, so i hope your product does good and more people start to be cover from post quantum issues.
Keep in mind that Bitcoin and its blockchain aren't quantum-safe. The network would have to undergo a hard fork to migrate away from legacy signatures. Who knows how long that's going to take and when it will be needed. Lock uses a combination of traditional, non-quantum-safe cryptography and a quantum-safe system. I don't have the technical know-how to comment on how that would work on a blockchain that itself isn't protected against the worst-case scenario and what would happen to Lock in case a quantum attack happened.

Thank you Pmalek for your answer, yes i know it, but i also know we already have the knowledge to overcome it which is super important we only need the next step which is what you said and is not an easy one. We have to come to a new consensus and made it bulletproof.

But this could take a lot of time and that could be a problem.



36. Post 67017024 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 14:48:49 CEST 2026) in [Unofficial] Boltz exchange - Bitcoin atomic swaps:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:49:23 AM
Is there any official news regarding the whereabouts of the compromised Coldcard funds?
I'd like to read it.
There are reports that the hackers have started mixing/coinjoining the stolen coins. For example, there is this X post that talks about it.
Apparently, some of the bitcoin is being coinjoined through Wasabi Wallet and Kruw's coordinator. I also saw a post from ZachXBT who posted about wishing that Kruw rots in prison and losses everything he has. Something along those lines.

Also read an article about that action done by hackers https://www.analyticsinsight.net/news/coldcard-bitcoin-theft-splits-as-64-btc-moves-through-wasabi-mixer Maybe this article can help to gain more info about recent actions done by those criminals.

But as what has been said there majority of the funds remain untouched.

Quote
Most stolen Bitcoin linked to the Coldcard exploit remains unmoved, while a separate attacker has begun using CoinJoin. Investigators continue tracking flagged addresses. Users with affected seeds must create new wallets and transfer funds because firmware updates cannot secure compromised seed phrases.

It seems that the hackers still finding ways on how they can launder the money and move it without traces.



37. Post 67016414 (unedited backup) (by YUriy1991) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 10:23:01 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on August 05, 2026, 03:58:49 PM
Since I am a Juventus fan, I kept one eye on today's Juventus vs Chelsea friendly match played in Hong Kong while working. The pitch condition wasn't the best and since this was a friendly, the result doesn't really matter. Most of the players considered fit enough got their chance today. I am happy for Zhegrova. He finally did something right after last season's bad performances. He scored the game-winning goal and it was a beautiful one.

If Juve doesn't win any tropies in Italy or Europe this season, at least they are the Hong Kong Football Festival champions. The trophy that actually matters. Grin
Juventus is a big team in Italy with a long history. Juventus chances of winning the Italian league this season are very good. Juventus striker Kenan Yildiz, a young player from Turkey. will also mature this season He just needs more trust from his teammates. Last season, they finished 6 in the Serie A standings with 69 points from 19 wins, 12 draws, and 7 losses. In my opinion, Juventus will be better this season as proven in their friendly match, they won against Chelsea. The players are developing, the team game is getting more solid. Juventus is very ready to take on the league in my opinion.



38. Post 67016289 (unedited backup) (by Lillominato89) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 09:17:43 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:59:36 AM
Juventus have finally signed Randall Kolo Muani and this will help them and paired with Johnathan David, the team will enjoy a good striking force as both men are poachers in front of goal. I really look forward to watching them when season starts.
I am sure Spalletti would rather have the management sell J. David and bring another big and powerful attacker instead. The media has been speculating about Sorloth of Atletico Madrid, but I doubt he will come. That's another €40 mil transfer operation and Juve can't do that without a major sale first. Mateo Pellegrino from Parma is an alternative. We will see. David has been nowhere close to the performances he showed when playing for Lille ever since signing for Juve.

Seeing a juventus fan celebrate the Hong Kong festival pre season championship show how massive the club have dropped.
I thought the smiley I placed at the end of my post would be enough for everyone to know that I was joking and being sarcastic. Apparently it wasn't.

I don’t think Juventus will let J. David go.
Last season they signed him as the solution to their attacking problems, and I’m convinced they still hold that view.
In reality, however, the player hasn’t really lived up to his potential – could he do so this year? Perhaps, because by now he should have settled in. It won’t be easy to sell him either, unless there are buyers willing to take him on.



39. Post 67016260 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 09:01:50 CEST 2026) in [Unofficial] Boltz exchange - Bitcoin atomic swaps:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:49:42 AM
Coldcard and Boltz aren't the only two services that have had problems in the last few days. The ZEUS Lightning wallet is non-operational since yesterday or the day before yesterday. They say that they suffered a "a cybersecurity incident." Similarly to Boltz, they claim that user funds weren't lost and aren't at risk but they are auditing their systems. More information is available in their blog post.

So now that's two Lightning network providers not working at once  Angry



40. Post 67015771 (unedited backup) (by Patikno) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 01:49:07 CEST 2026) in What should you know before recommending Bitcoin to a friend?:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 01, 2026, 07:22:01 AM
The days of me recommending bitcoin to friends are gone. I have tried different tactics to get them interested but they just don't want to. Some don't get it, others aren't interested. I have even gifted BTC to some of my best friends. They don't care. I think I would have had more success with bananas.

I still get the occasional "how is that Bitcoin thing going?" type of questions. When the price increased above $100k and they heard about it, some commented that they regret not buying. When it started dropping, it was a different story. Now they are certain that BTC is doomed to fail and there is no future for it anymore. I just shrug it off with a smile.

Satoshi was right when he said, "if you don't believe or don't get it, then I don't have the time to try to convince you." Do your own thing and be happy.
Would you have more success offering them a banana ? In other words, do your friends want instant gratification; something they can enjoy right away ? I think that mindset is flawed; instant rewards are beneficial, sure, but only in the short term. Some of my friends think the same way, they just want to make huge, and quick profits without wanting to go through the actual process. Come on, nothing works like that; you have to put in effort to earn even a single dollar.

In the end, the same thing happened with my friends. When the price of Bitcoin climbed above $100,000, they finally became interested in hearing about it. They really should have listened to me sooner. The difference between your story and mine is; they are the ones now asking about Bitcoin's progress, without me having to be the one to bring it up, or explain it first.

Honestly, I have lost the desire to talk about it with people who only want instant results. I feel like they are only interested in the price, with no regard for Bitcoin’s functional value, or its potential for future growth. That said, I won’t hide anything from them; I just won’t initiate the conversation myself. I only explain Bitcoin when they ask me about it.



41. Post 67015344 (unedited backup) (by Sally9256) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 23:30:37 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:58:49 PM
Since I am a Juventus fan, I kept one eye on today's Juventus vs Chelsea friendly match played in Hong Kong while working. The pitch condition wasn't the best and since this was a friendly, the result doesn't really matter. Most of the players considered fit enough got their chance today. I am happy for Zhegrova. He finally did something right after last season's bad performances. He scored the game-winning goal and it was a beautiful one.

If Juve doesn't win any tropies in Italy or Europe this season, at least they are the Hong Kong Football Festival champions. The trophy that actually matters. Grin
Seeing a juventus fan celebrate the Hong Kong festival pre season championship show how massive the club have dropped. Juventus is a club that we use to know in dominating the Italian football, but now juventus have to struggle to even get a champions league football. On the other hand it wasn’t a bad game today, at least they defended very well, but The overall performance needs to improve.

Next season I’m still in a huge doubt if juventus will do well in the league, they have been disappointing this transfer window, I expected them to get good players but instead we are seeing the board being in Kolo Muani, a player who had a terrible season at Tottenham. I won’t be too quick to judge, so I will wait and see how the club perform next season.



42. Post 67015050 (unedited backup) (by lionheart78) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 22:08:55 CEST 2026) in Degen.com | Fastest Growing Online Casino & Sportsbook | DEGEN VIP Transfer:

Quote from: mikel_012 on Today at 05:13:38 AM
Even so, it’s a huge win. But it is certainly something worth reflecting on. After 544 attempts, the big prize finally arrived. This shows that winning a big prize is possible, but not easy. In any case, now I’m tempted to play Limbo...Grin
Do not forget for this big win 1000x more people played and lost money

If you can make a 1000x or 100000x win after 544 attempts, the casino will break and we all know they are not a charity but a business that makes lots of money Grin


This made me think whether some hit that 1,000,000x but thinking of the announcement, I believe that 1000x is the highest multiplier that won, and no one bets higher than that.  if anyone hits that 1,000,000x with high bet like $100, I think it will cause a serious bankroll challenge for the casino but at the same time will also cause huge sensation on the internet.

Quote from: mikel_012 on Today at 05:13:38 AM
Play for fun, but do not expect a big win like this will definitely come. Many friends of mine lose more than win in slots and casinos, they have more luck with sports bet because they can understand more about the teams playing and so you can win when you are good at predicting and studying each team and statistics

Yeah, expecting a huge win will only give us disappointment and frustration.  Better to expect the worst so that when the result turns to be better, it will give us great joy.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:49:07 AM
I doubt that he didn't follow the round to its end just to see what happens. But even 1000x isn't something you see everyday in crash games. I have played some of them in the past and bet a little bit but never tried my luck with massive multipliers like that. If I can double my money with a 2x multiplier then I am happy with that. It's not unusual to see a crash at 1.01x and similar low levels, so I always keep that in mind.

Yeah, 1000x is a very rare event not only in crash games but also in other chance-based games.  Same here, I also don't have the luck to hit 100x or more.  As far as I remember, the highest multiplier I got from crash games is only 7x.



43. Post 67014967 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 21:42:56 CEST 2026) in Boltz swaps were disabled:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 5, 2026, 04:31:40 AM
To me that sounds like the service lost something unless they are talking about potential losses had certain vulnerabilities and flaws been discovered and abused.
I saw this post on X, the context is that boltz issued a warning signing a pgp letter to users certifying that they (boltz) have not received any government order to seize their infrastructure (yet).

In the letter mentions that they will commit to issuing a new notice within 60 days stating that they are fine, if don't, they stop updating us, we can consider that the worst has happened.

In short, they implemented a kind of deadman switch that will serve as an alert if they are under coercion.

The notice was issued on the domain called warrant canary, a transparency mechanism used by privacy services: https://canary.boltz.exchange/

Quote from: Post on X from Adam Simecka on August 5, 2026, 04:31:40 AM
This is bigger than the Coldcard news.

Canary - Boltz Exchange [link that contain refer] Original link: https://canary.boltz.exchange/




44. Post 67014895 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 21:16:43 CEST 2026) in Novosti:

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 05:02:43 PM
Niko sretniji sad nije nego dkbit98. Grin Nek postavi neko onaj meme gdje dkbit98 dkbit98u stavlja medalju oko vrata
Ma nisam sretan, samo sam opet bio u pravu.  Cool
Zanimljivo da taj bug sa c0ldcardom je nastao dana kad je nvk odlučio da njegovo sranje više nije open source.
To je točno ono što sam ja već ranije napisao. Meni je to 90% šanse da je namjerno ubačen. Čudno kako se uvijek te stvari nekako poklope u kriptu.



45. Post 67014659 (unedited backup) (by Oluwa-btc) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 19:51:49 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:58:49 PM
Since I am a Juventus fan, I kept one eye on today's Juventus vs Chelsea friendly match played in Hong Kong while working. The pitch condition wasn't the best and since this was a friendly, the result doesn't really matter. Most of the players considered fit enough got their chance today. I am happy for Zhegrova. He finally did something right after last season's bad performances. He scored the game-winning goal and it was a beautiful one.

If Juve doesn't win any tropies in Italy or Europe this season, at least they are the Hong Kong Football Festival champions. The trophy that actually matters. Grin

Naaa!   Grin
I know this is a joke but nobody considers it worthy.
I was confident Juventus wins today because Spalletti managed them for quite some time already last season even before the season came to an end. I still think they need to add two more players to their squad list. Joshua Zirkzee from Manchester United was mentioned according to a sports journalist. It is rumoured he knows the league and will want to make a return. I don't know, but he did perform well with Bologna.

Why are Manchester United fans hate watching Ruben Amorim this way?! Not a single lose in his pre-season and they be raining ill words on him.



46. Post 67014485 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 19:02:49 CEST 2026) in Novosti:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 01, 2026, 06:52:59 AM
Niko sretniji sad nije nego dkbit98. Grin Nek postavi neko onaj meme gdje dkbit98 dkbit98u stavlja medalju oko vrata
Ma nisam sretan, samo sam opet bio u pravu.
Zanimljivo da taj bug sa c0ldcardom je nastao dana kad je nvk odlučio da wegovo sranje više nije open source.




47. Post 67014356 (unedited backup) (by Majestic-milf) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 18:14:19 CEST 2026) in Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A):

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:58:49 PM
Since I am a Juventus fan, I kept one eye on today's Juventus vs Chelsea friendly match played in Hong Kong while working. The pitch condition wasn't the best and since this was a friendly, the result doesn't really matter. Most of the players considered fit enough got their chance today. I am happy for Zhegrova. He finally did something right after last season's bad performances. He scored the game-winning goal and it was a beautiful one.

If Juve doesn't win any tropies in Italy or Europe this season, at least they are the Hong Kong Football Festival champions. The trophy that actually matters. Grin
Chelsea went on a back to back defeat in the friendlies whereas Juventus went two games with a win and didn't concede any goals. I Kno it's the preseason but these results will help boost the morale of players who haven't really been doing well. Juventus have finally signed Randall Kolo Muani and this will help them and paired with Johnathan David, the team will enjoy a good striking force as both men are poachers in front of goal. I really look forward to watching them when season starts.



48. Post 67013803 (unedited backup) (by satscraper) (scraped on Wed Aug 5 15:32:19 CEST 2026) in [ANN Preview] Lock.com: a split- architecture wallet for safer self-custody :

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:22:06 AM
I am not so sure about this. I don't want to turn my back on hardware wallets altogether because of what Coldcard, NVK, and the rest of the guys did. Their implementation was flawed but that doesn't make 12/24-word seeds unsafe now, especially with a complex, long, and non-bruteforcable (according to today's standards) passphrase or multisig involving several other parties. Entropy from non-biased dice is still good.

The flawed code of Coldcard was public for five years. Why didn't anyone notice it? People can argue that nobody wanted to waste their time reviewing it or working with NVK because of his past behavior but I don't think that's good enough of an excuse. Any expert that claimed to have "reviewed" Coldcard's code and gave them the thumbs up messed up.

If people weren't able to find the vulnerabilities with that product for five years, what are the chances they will review Lock properly and its 2 million lines of code? At the moment, that's a no from me.

If I make the decision to abandon all hardware wallets, it's going to be for a completely and properly airgapped setup involving Electrum on an offline computer. To me, that's levelling up in terms of security.

It seems that setup which meets your requirement exists already, and this is Tails, which has Electrum preinstalled and is capable of booting on any machine offline via USB port. This setup has been proven over the years. New setup, like Lock OS with its millions of entries in its codebase is likely to have more flaws than anything else users have faced so far.



49. Post 67011827 (unedited backup) (by icebar) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 22:58:37 CEST 2026) in Lessons From the Biggest Bitcoin Losses in History.:

Quote from: Pmalek on August 03, 2026, 11:04:43 AM
I’ve seen people like Michael Saylor using this opportunity to tell people that it is better to put money in custodial ETFs, centralized exchanges and treasury company stocks. That is a completely wrong mentality. The ColdCard incident, as painful as it is to have to learn through devastating losses, will lead to better hardware wallet security and more thorough testing. Another important lesson is that when a developer is as hubristic and hostile as NVK, they should be scrutinized the hardest. Acting tough and untouchable isn’t going to protect anybody’s multi-million dollar fortune.
It was to be expected that various services would use this unfortunate incident to their advantage in order to advertise their own products and boost their sales. Michael Saylor has said all kinds of things, from never selling bitcoin to buying bitcoin forever, regardless of the price. That then changed to sell some bitcoin and buy back later. Then it changed again to him saying that regular people shouldn't sell, but it's different for institutional investors. The most recent news is that Strategy has put forward plans to sell $5 billion worth of BTC to increase their cash reserves. People say one thing when things look bright and another one when they get dark(er).
I would definitely agree with you. An investor's situation will not be always stable. That is why there may be a difference between his previous and his current statements. From the beginning, Michael Saylor was steadfast in his principle of only holding. He himself has done this, but there is no guarantee that his plan will always be the same. An important point is that he did not invest his personal money in Bitcoin. Since he is an institutional investor, he must sell Bitcoin. In running an organization, money is needed at different times, and it is not possible to invest that required money in Bitcoin and keep it for a long time.

Ordinary investors should not invest in Bitcoin depending on any particular person or influencer. We have heard about Elon Musk before, and everyone knows how much loss he caused for various investors. Although there is no such allegation against Michael Saylor, everyone who invests will have to accept the risk of his assets. Whether someone sells or buys is their own business, but according to their principles, investing in Bitcoin is definitely not profitable.



50. Post 67011787 (unedited backup) (by lionheart78) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 22:45:19 CEST 2026) in Degen.com | Fastest Growing Online Casino & Sportsbook | DEGEN VIP Transfer:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:48:54 AM
For this player he selected 1000x so he won this much, but he could have tried 1000000x and he would win a lot more.
That's what I thought. His wager was on a 1,000x multiplier for a Limbo round that ended with a 1,000,000x multiplier. They could have simplified it and written it like that. There was no need to write how the player "hit" 1,000,000x. He didn't. He made a bet in a round that ended with that multiplier, but his wager was on a much lower value.

It is also possible that the player himself is unaware that the limbo hits 1,000,000 x since it automatically cashes out once it hits the betted multiplier and it will take time for the game to hit 1,000,000x.
I also don't think that the player regrets that he only bet 1000x. I bet he is truly excited when the multiplier reaches his bet point.

And yeah, it should not have been written the way it was written because the player did not hit that 1000000 multiplier in any sense.

Quote from: r_victory on Today at 04:32:28 PM
Even so, it’s a huge win. But it is certainly something worth reflecting on. After 544 attempts, the big prize finally arrived. This shows that winning a big prize is possible, but not easy. In any case, now I’m tempted to play Limbo...Grin

It is always tempting to play the game that is advertised to give a huge multiplier.  I am very much tempted too, but the sense in me keeps me calm.



51. Post 67011606 (unedited backup) (by Klyroll) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 21:52:55 CEST 2026) in 🍀 Kliroll - Play Anonymously. No KYC, 24/7 Non-Stop Crypto Casino Action 🔥:

Quote from: negotiation4 on Today at 05:36:44 PM

Are your hot wallets public?

Hello negotiation4, That's a great question, Right now, for security and internal liquidity management, our hot wallet addresses are kept private. However, as we grow and scale our operations, we are definitely exploring ways to introduce better transparency features (like reserve proofs).
Thanks for bringing this up.

Well let me do it on your behalf.
0xd3114A6B4744143486336C49EBD8952FBC911169
Almost $236 in reserves on Ethereum.

Thanks for checking, but that address is not our operational treasury or hot wallet. It is likely just one of the gateway or routing addresses associated with transaction processing or third-party integrations.
As we noted, our main liquidity and reserve wallets are kept private for security reasons. Rest assured, our operational funds are structured securely behind the scenes. Appreciate you keeping an eye out 😀💙




Quote from: MuffinMaster on Today at 06:36:56 PM
Your left-side menu has a "Wagering" tab. It's filled with slot games. Why call it "wagering"? Does it list games you can wager bonuses on or is there some other reason behind the name?
"Wagering" Tab: Spot on, You understood it correctly those are indeed the games designated for clearing bonus wagering.

So wagering bonuses can only be earned on these slots and no other games?

License / Company Number: Regarding the number 3102712845 just to be fully transparent, that is our Costa Rica corporate/tax entity registration number rather than a traditional iGaming master license (since, as we mentioned, we are starting transparently without heavy tier-1 licenses for now). That's likely why it won't show up in standard gambling licensing registries. We'll make sure to clarify that distinction clearly in our terms!

So it's not a license, just a company registration number. In short, you don't have a license.

So, right now, the casino is not really a "no-KYC" casino,

If you're not a no-KYC casino, then stop lying about being a no-KYC casino. Simple as that.

Do you have any social media or Telegram?


Let's address these point by point:

Wagering Games: Yes, there are currently 203 games included in that bonus category, and this list will be gradually expanded moving forward.

License / Registration: As we stated transparently from the beginning, we are operating under a Costa Rica corporate registration entity right now, not a traditional tier-1 iGaming master license. We've never tried to hide that fact transparency is our priority.

No-KYC: It depends on how you define it. For 95% of our players, you register with an email, deposit crypto, and play anonymously without submitting ID documents. Standard AML or security checks only exist as a backstop for severe risk/fraud cases. We aren't lying; we are just keeping it practical for everyday players while maintaining basic safety protocols.

Social Media & Telegram: We currently don't have public social media channels or a Telegram group up yet thanks for the suggestion, we are definitely planning to set them up in the near future!

Thanks for keeping the discussion direct and open 💙




Quote from: Obim34 on Today at 07:08:24 PM
Well let me do it on your behalf.
0xd3114A6B4744143486336C49EBD8952FBC911169
Almost $236 in reserves on Ethereum.
How did you get this proof if the casino says their reserves are kept undisclosed?

I understand this is a new casino, but $236 in the hot wallet is really a small amount, the owners can do better.

If you're not a no-KYC casino, then stop lying about being a no-KYC casino. Simple as that.

Do you have any social media or Telegram?
Fair point, although we have many other casinos doing the same, presenting as No KYC, but can at any point demand KYC.


Thanks for jumping in, Obim34!

Just to reiterate regarding the wallet address mentioned earlier that is definitely not our actual treasury or liquidity reserve. If it were only $236, we'd probably be in trouble 😀
And regarding the No-KYC discussion, you hit the nail on the head. That's the reality of how most crypto platforms operate: smooth day-to-day play without bureaucratic friction, with standard security backstops in place.

Thanks for bringing a fair and realistic perspective to the table 💙




Quote from: panjul07 on Today at 07:10:31 PM
  • No KYC on Routine Operations: Fast registration and hassle-free, anonymous gameplay designed to protect your privacy.
Can you please explain with more detail what you mean by "routine" here, maybe by giving a real example of routine operation that wont cause KYC later?
Is it merely about deposits/withdrawals, about wager activity, or combined? If it is combined, do you have specific criteria on how often or maybe how much they can be considered as routine?

  • Provably Fair: Transparent mechanics ensuring verifiable randomness.
Which games you are claiming to be provably fair, as far as I can see is that all your games are coming from external providers and most of them are not provably fair because there is no way to verify the bets made on that games.
Real proVably fair usually implemented on original in-house games while games from external providers are mostly proBably fair only.


Hello, Great questions panjul07. You're bringing up key points, and I'm happy to clarify

Routine Operations & KYC Thresholds: By 'routine', we mean standard, everyday gameplay and transactions where no risk triggers are tripped. This includes regular deposits, gameplay, and cash-outs. It becomes non-routine (and triggers a review) only when system flags are raised such as multi-accounting, bonus abuse patterns, suspicious high-velocity transactions, or chargeback disputes. While we don't publish exact internal algorithmic triggers for obvious security reasons, a standard player won't ever encounter them

Provably Fair / External Providers: You are completely right, and thank you for the correction! Since our games are integrated from licensed external providers rather than built in-house, they rely on certified RNGs (Random Number Generators) rather than the classical cryptographic 'Provably Fair' hash-verification systems. We will update our wording to reflect that accurately so it doesn't cause any confusion




Quote from: Coyster on Today at 07:22:12 PM
Why those T&C Clauses Exist (5.1.1 - 5.3): Like any platform operating legally (even as an early-stage startup), we are bound by standard legal frameworks, anti-money laundering (AML) guidelines, and risk management protocols. Those clauses are our legal safety net. They are not there to randomly strip players of their funds, but rather to protect the platform against extreme red flags (such as fraud, underage gambling, multi-accounting abuse of bonuses, or suspicious high-risk transactions).
We get that, it simply means there is a possibility that a player would be asked to verify their identity, so your platform is not a "NO-KYC" one, and there is nothing wrong in that. The community already knows that most platforms that advertise as NO-KYC are not, it is just misleading when they advertise as that and it is doesn't do them any good.
Can you please explain with more detail what you mean by "routine" here, maybe by giving a real example of routine operation that wont cause KYC later?
Of course you'll expet them to say KYC would be triggered when players break the rules or are suspected of foul play. Nevertheless, it is common for casinos to block withdrawals and ask for KYC when players win big. Grin


Hello, you make a very fair point, Coyster, and we completely respect that perspective

You're right that the term 'No-KYC' has been overused and sometimes misused across the industry, leading to well-founded skepticism especially regarding large wins. Our goal isn't to play word games, but rather to prove through our actions over time that our checks are strictly for risk management, not a tactic for withholding legitimate wins.

Thanks for the input 🙏



52. Post 67011337 (unedited backup) (by MuffinMaster) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 20:37:01 CEST 2026) in 🍀 Kliroll - Play Anonymously. No KYC, 24/7 Non-Stop Crypto Casino Action 🔥:

Quote from: Klyroll on Today at 04:34:25 PM
Your left-side menu has a "Wagering" tab. It's filled with slot games. Why call it "wagering"? Does it list games you can wager bonuses on or is there some other reason behind the name?
"Wagering" Tab: Spot on, You understood it correctly those are indeed the games designated for clearing bonus wagering.

So wagering bonuses can only be earned on these slots and no other games?

Quote from: Klyroll on Today at 04:34:25 PM
License / Company Number: Regarding the number 3102712845 just to be fully transparent, that is our Costa Rica corporate/tax entity registration number rather than a traditional iGaming master license (since, as we mentioned, we are starting transparently without heavy tier-1 licenses for now). That's likely why it won't show up in standard gambling licensing registries. We'll make sure to clarify that distinction clearly in our terms!

So it's not a license, just a company registration number. In short, you don't have a license.

Quote from: Klyroll on Today at 04:34:25 PM
So, right now, the casino is not really a "no-KYC" casino,

If you're not a no-KYC casino, then stop lying about being a no-KYC casino. Simple as that.

Do you have any social media or Telegram?



53. Post 67010964 (unedited backup) (by Klyroll) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 18:34:31 CEST 2026) in 🍀 Kliroll - Play Anonymously. No KYC, 24/7 Non-Stop Crypto Casino Action 🔥:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:32:45 PM
The website lacks the usual flashy graphics, images, texts, and detailed backgrounds we see in many other casinos. It's not necessarily a bad thing. For one, it's easier to look at. At the bottom of the site, the last line of text shows how much 1 SOL is worth in USD. I wonder why you are showing that? Why exactly SOL and not BTC, ETH, or some other coin?

Your left-side menu has a "Wagering" tab. It's filled with slot games. Why call it "wagering"? Does it list games you can wager bonuses on or is there some other reason behind the name?

Hello Pmalek, Thanks for the awesome feedback 💙
Design: You nailed it. Our exact goal was to keep it clean and minimalist no overwhelming clutter or flashing banners. We prefer a sleek interface and really hope players appreciate this smoother approach.
SOL Price: Haha, as for Solana we just genuinely love the coin and root for it! It's smart, fast, and close to our hearts. We're trying to be just as 'smart' as SOL. 😇
"Wagering" Tab: Spot on, You understood it correctly those are indeed the games designated for clearing bonus wagering.

Thanks for asking, appreciate your keen eye and support 💙


Quote from: Agbe on Today at 03:39:04 PM
I couldn't find any information about your license, so I'm a bit confused that you have such strict KYC verification requirements..
The license number is in the ToS but I was trying to verify the license number and it is not found and this what is written.
"3102712845 Not found in any of the 5 checked authority databases. Checked on 04 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC". Though this is the first time I am trying to verify a casino license and I am thinking I didn't use the proper verification website. So if anyone knows one please drop link so we can check it.

As for the Op you're welcome to the forum, and if you really mean business here, you can purchase a copper membership from here Copper Membership . And another thing you have to do is to be active in this thread to answer and resolve matters.

Hello Agbe, and thank you for the warm welcome and the solid advice.

License / Company Number: Regarding the number 3102712845 just to be fully transparent, that is our Costa Rica corporate/tax entity registration number rather than a traditional iGaming master license (since, as we mentioned, we are starting transparently without heavy tier-1 licenses for now). That's likely why it won't show up in standard gambling licensing registries. We'll make sure to clarify that distinction clearly in our terms!

Copper & Activity: Thanks for the tip about the Copper Membership, we will definitely look into it.

Thanks again for keeping us sharp 💙


Quote from: negotiation4 on Today at 03:53:29 PM
Are your hot wallets public?

Hello negotiation4, That's a great question, Right now, for security and internal liquidity management, our hot wallet addresses are kept private. However, as we grow and scale our operations, we are definitely exploring ways to introduce better transparency features (like reserve proofs).
Thanks for bringing this up.


Quote from: acroman08 on Today at 04:20:13 PM
KYC & Bonuses: You raised a very fair point. While our regular gameplay is designed to be smooth and anonymous, certain promotional terms (especially around higher-tier bonuses to prevent abuse/multi-accounts) currently require standard profile details. However, we are continuously reviewing our policies to find the best balance between security and user privacy.
So, right now, the casino is not really a "no-KYC" casino, but a casino that enforces KYC if they flagged something on the gambler. Sounds like what a lot of casino that claims they are "no-KYC" casino.

Anyway, Welcome to the Forum!


Hey acroman08, Thank you for pulling up those exact clauses this is a very valid and sharp question, and I appreciate the chance to clarify.

Here is how it actually works in practice:

No-KYC on Routine Play: For 95% of our regular players, gameplay and transactions do not require uploading identity documents or passports. You register with an email, fund via crypto, and play.

Why those T&C Clauses Exist (5.1.1 - 5.3): Like any platform operating legally (even as an early-stage startup), we are bound by standard legal frameworks, anti-money laundering (AML) guidelines, and risk management protocols. Those clauses are our legal safety net. They are not there to randomly strip players of their funds, but rather to protect the platform against extreme red flags (such as fraud, underage gambling, multi-accounting abuse of bonuses, or suspicious high-risk transactions).

We know that marketing terms like "No-KYC" can sometimes be misleading across the industry, but our goal is simple: no bureaucratic hassle for regular, honest players, while retaining the legal right to step in only when security or compliance forces us to do so.

Thanks for keeping us on our toes this type of scrutiny is exactly why we wanted to be transparent here from day one 💙



54. Post 67010823 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 17:40:07 CEST 2026) in Degen.com | Fastest Growing Online Casino & Sportsbook | DEGEN VIP Transfer:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:48:54 AM
For this player he selected 1000x so he won this much, but he could have tried 1000000x and he would win a lot more.
That's what I thought. His wager was on a 1,000x multiplier for a Limbo round that ended with a 1,000,000x multiplier. They could have simplified it and written it like that. There was no need to write how the player "hit" 1,000,000x. He didn't. He made a bet in a round that ended with that multiplier, but his wager was on a much lower value.
He hit 1,000,000x in the game but of course the limit is for what he chose. In the post the casino makes clear that he set the multiplier to 1000x, in the same phrase

The reason they worded like this is because they question how would you feel after seeing this, that you hit a big multiplier but you missed 1000x more. This generates discussions and it is a good marketing to the casino. See that we are talking about this big hit and miss here Cheesy



55. Post 67010818 (unedited backup) (by Casino Critique) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 17:38:31 CEST 2026) in Priamex ♻️ FREE raffle #2 welcome round | Prize pool $50, Winner takes all!:

 SLOTS

1   -
2   -
3   - snowpega
4   - Hypnotizer
5   -
6   - tvplus006
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   - xandry
11   -
12   - f150
13   -
14   -
15   - Smartprofit
16   -
17   -
18   -
19   -
20   -
21   - Pandorak
22   - klarki
23   -
24   - DYING_S0UL
25   -
26   -
27   -
28   - Pmalek
29   -
30   -
31   - Ricardo11
32   -
33   - Yoona_As
34   - Improved
35   -
36   -
37   - viljy
38   - lovesmayfamilis
39   - Ninja Primes
40   - Danydee
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   - bitmover
45   - RTX-G53
46   -
47   -
48   - bitzizzix
49   - inearth
50   -



56. Post 67010619 (unedited backup) (by Pumared) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 16:22:43 CEST 2026) in Degen.com | Fastest Growing Online Casino & Sportsbook | DEGEN VIP Transfer:

Quote from: Bitinity on Today at 08:33:28 AM
That's what I thought. His wager was on a 1,000x multiplier for a Limbo round that ended with a 1,000,000x multiplier. They could have simplified it and written it like that. There was no need to write how the player "hit" 1,000,000x. He didn't. He made a bet in a round that ended with that multiplier, but his wager was on a much lower value.

The X post cant be misleading for some people due to the wording "hit a 1,000,000x" because when we say that we "hit", most people may think that the hit winning multiplier is the mentioned one. Perhaps it would be much better if they say something like "this player hit 1,000x while the game reached/ended with 1,000,000x" or something similar. On the other side, I can understand why they made it a bit hyperbole which is a marketing strategy to gain intention because people will always feel amazed when they see a huge number of multiplier.

The intention is to show the final multiplier in the best way possible. I think stating how much he won throughout the bet doesn't make sense, and it's good that it generates comments and encourages users to try their luck as well.



57. Post 67010302 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 14:29:13 CEST 2026) in [Nezvanična tema] Boltz exchange - Bitcoin atomic swaps:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:38 AM
... Hakeri koriste AI kako bi pronašli ranjivosti i ukrali novac...

/snip

Mislim da sve više IT sustava ima ovakve probleme. AI je donio dosta toga dobroga, ali kao i sve, može se koristiti za loše stvari. Još kad se poklopi da se radi o IT sustavu gdje je hakiranjem direktno moguće ukrasti novac/crypto, gdje ćeš boljeg poticaja. Kod ostalih sustava je potrebno hakirati pa tražiti otkupninu koju vlasnik IT sustava može ali i ne mora platiti. Ovako automatski nakon uspješnog hakiranja imaš lovu.



58. Post 67009862 (unedited backup) (by ultrloa) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 11:39:01 CEST 2026) in A Comprehensive Definition of Cryptocurrency Terms:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:58:20 AM
One of the best pieces of feedback I've had since the campaign ended. I have taken down the ads, but I'm looking for ways to keep them from interfering again if I add a banner again.
That's too bad, especially if it already helped monetizing the site a bit.
Perhaps a different placement or size of the banner? Have you tried placing the ad slightly higher or lowering the brackets with the letters? Maybe the ad can even be positioned in the top right/left corner in a smaller size. Putting it in the footer decreases the visibility, so that wouldn't work.

If those ads in the site helps a lot, doing good experiment towards proper positioning or placement of the ads is definitely good to do. He can adjust the size of the banner or do some changes like adjust the size the content of the ads so he can still highlight the messaging on what he tries to promote without creating bigger changes or destroying his current layout.

But since his site is new, improving those matters or maybe the design of his site will help him bring lots of traffic then next to that is to gain advertisers.

Adding those creative twist, proper ads positioning and ideal sizes of the text will help him gain more good results.




59. Post 67009680 (unedited backup) (by Bitinity) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 10:33:31 CEST 2026) in Degen.com | Fastest Growing Online Casino & Sportsbook | DEGEN VIP Transfer:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:48:54 AM
That's what I thought. His wager was on a 1,000x multiplier for a Limbo round that ended with a 1,000,000x multiplier. They could have simplified it and written it like that. There was no need to write how the player "hit" 1,000,000x. He didn't. He made a bet in a round that ended with that multiplier, but his wager was on a much lower value.

The X post cant be misleading for some people due to the wording "hit a 1,000,000x" because when we say that we "hit", most people may think that the hit winning multiplier is the mentioned one. Perhaps it would be much better if they say something like "this player hit 1,000x while the game reached/ended with 1,000,000x" or something similar. On the other side, I can understand why they made it a bit hyperbole which is a marketing strategy to gain intention because people will always feel amazed when they see a huge number of multiplier.



60. Post 67008955 (unedited backup) (by robelneo) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 01:22:55 CEST 2026) in A Comprehensive Definition of Cryptocurrency Terms:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:00:15 AM
Since this is still work-in-progress, it makes no sense to comment on the amount of terms. You will add new ones with time. I did find it funny when I saw Vitalik Buterin in the list and have to ask, why him and no other names (besides satoshi)? Charlie Lee invented Litecoin and there are many other personalities more closely associated with Bitcoin.
Lined up to be added and gathering all the best information, you are right beside the terms. I should also be focusing on the personality behind the crypto space.

Quote
The table layout is somewhat messed up. Take a look at the image below. Those brackets on the left are also links to the Priamex ad above it.
One of the best pieces of feedback I've had since the campaign ended. I have taken down the ads, but I'm looking for ways to keep them from interfering again if I add a banner again.

So far, 53 terms, and this week we'll have over 100 terms.



61. Post 67008520 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 23:11:31 CEST 2026) in Degen.com | Fastest Growing Online Casino & Sportsbook | DEGEN VIP Transfer:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:26:44 PM
I am a bit confused with that X post to be honest. It says that the player hit a 1,000,000x multiplier but wagered only on a 1,000x multiplier. Why are they saying that he "hit" one thing when he wagered something else? Did that particular round end with a 1,000,000x multiplier, meaning it could have been his potential win had he bet on that?

I think they could have made that X post clearer.
In that game you select a multiplier you want and you win the multiplier if the result is that value or higher

This means if I choose 10x and the result for that round is 5x, I lose because it is lower than my multiplier.

If the result is 10x I win because it is equal what I choose.

And if it is 20x I also win because it is higher than the 10x I chose, but I only receive the 10x that I selected.

For this player he selected 1000x so he won this much, but he could have tried 1000000x and he would win a lot more.



62. Post 67008346 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 22:25:43 CEST 2026) in Priamex ♻️ FREE raffle welcome round | Prize pool $50, Winner takes all!:

Quote from: Casino Critique on July 26, 2026, 03:59:52 PM
 SLOTS

1   - Leahized
2   - Cityhunter34
3   - Bogimen
4   - strunberg
5   - Wqjdd
6   - bitmover
7   - Royal Cap
8   - zasad@
9   - Fulllove1
10   - FinneysTrueVision
11   - LokhcfyBit
12   - Odenleva09
13   - Chibit01
14   - Forsyth Jones
15   - Ricardo11
16   - Kuconas
17   - Antdm
18   - rentxa
19   - r_victory
20   - LogitechMouse
21   - Pandorak
22   - Obari
23   - Yconz
24   - osasshem
25   - Warkop
26   - TryNinja
27   - DokuAd
28   - Xbajwk
29   - cryptobest4all
30   - Cointikka
31   - Xifi
32   - Protonvive
33   - Yoona_As
34   - Hatchy
35   -
36   - inearth
37   - Xbaus
38   - Zangi777
39   - Tanelhole
40   - Miles2006
41   - Potato Chips
42   -
43   - shakshii
44   - tvplus006
45   - f150
46   -
47   - adefunmi
48   -
49   - Wolimmon
50   - BADERO
51   - cryptoaddictchie
52   -
53   - MarryWithBTC
54   - RTX-G53
55   - xGennady
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   - BTCbom
60   -
61   - Huntblt
62   - Jiopen
63   - WhattheFk
64   -
65   - HarvestOpan
66   - HausaBitCkk
67   - wengibway
68   - Ninja Primes
69   - LNC999
70   -
71   - ASK Day
72   - vikkynice
73   - vandomm
74   - sabotag3x
75   - mv1986
76   - Gooodosa
77   - Taricoins
78   - lovesmayfamilis
79   - Qjmak333
80   - Ventazz
81   - klarki
82   - Pmalek
83   - Hello5
84   - bitzizzix
85   - wallwallbtc
86   - neasha
87   - Soqunami
88   - viljy
89   - Eardwot
90   - NuckaBTC
91   - slapper
92   - hedgeh0g
93   - snowpega
94   - Ms14344
95   - oll
96   - Vaigine
97   - Debbiecrypto
98   - xandry
99   - Smartprofit
100   - Alvin_talk
We will find it here

Let's go with block height 960908



63. Post 67006864 (unedited backup) (by arwin100) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 15:02:07 CEST 2026) in Lessons From the Biggest Bitcoin Losses in History.:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 11:04:43 AM
I’ve seen people like Michael Saylor using this opportunity to tell people that it is better to put money in custodial ETFs, centralized exchanges and treasury company stocks. That is a completely wrong mentality. The ColdCard incident, as painful as it is to have to learn through devastating losses, will lead to better hardware wallet security and more thorough testing. Another important lesson is that when a developer is as hubristic and hostile as NVK, they should be scrutinized the hardest. Acting tough and untouchable isn’t going to protect anybody’s multi-million dollar fortune.
It was to be expected that various services would use this unfortunate incident to their advantage in order to advertise their own products and boost their sales. Michael Saylor has said all kinds of things, from never selling bitcoin to buying bitcoin forever, regardless of the price. That then changed to sell some bitcoin and buy back later. Then it changed again to him saying that regular people shouldn't sell, but it's different for institutional investors. The most recent news is that Strategy has put forward plans to sell $5 billion worth of BTC to increase their cash reserves. People say one thing when things look bright and another one when they get dark(er).

Well that's how they take advantage on the news, Coldcard is common topic now and Saylor just ride on the noise and try to market those products that they have.

Also his tone change depends on market situation. If we look at his past actions he always says about never sell and continue to buy when market is in good condition. But his narrative change and he's now into selling and drop many reasons why they made that sales.

Speaking about sales as what I read on Bitcoin Magazine Strategy again sold 1,637 Bitcoins, don't know if this new or just re upload. But It seems that dumps is their new normal now https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HZiUc27yE/.

With such thing happened to them it just shows that their business decision change depends on the situations happened in the market.




64. Post 67006664 (unedited backup) (by sidrabtc) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 13:48:32 CEST 2026) in Don't be scared to start all-over:

Quote from: Rockstarguy on Today at 10:56:01 AM
It's sad, but the best lessons are learned when they happen to you personally. Never trust anyone who claims they want to make you money and they are there to help you. Bullshit. They want to help themselves and make money off of you. People who consider unsolicited investment opportunities as scams and the people who contact them as scammers will be better off than individuals willing to hear them out and give it a try. It's a nasty world out there, so be careful. Don't be the small fish that gets eaten.
Those who fall victim to scams always think something is too hard for them to learn, which leads them to prefer that others do it for them, so they won't have to go through the difficulties. A mindset like this is what causes people to lose money.

I think people should develop the habit of seeing that they can do things for themselves, especially when it comes to money. In investing and trading, it is personal, and whoever claims to help people is only looking to make a gain. People will always make mistakes and regret it when they limit themselves to learning and think others do it better.
Doing things for themselves always keeps things in balance because trusting others always increases problems and the chance of losing enough, which has never been recoverable in this world.
People who are well aware of this bitter truth know that technology is bringing good development, but with this, life is also becoming complicated, always having your work done before its end, and you are just regretting your laziness. Few people have the habit of doing things by themselves; they mostly always want to rely on other searches and analyses. This never ends well, especially in trading or any investment.
Always use precautions because things can take changes frequently, and losses can happen with no chance of having any penny back.



65. Post 67006546 (unedited backup) (by Rockstarguy) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 12:56:01 CEST 2026) in Don't be scared to start all-over:

Quote from: Pmalek on July 30, 2026, 07:49:52 AM
It's sad, but the best lessons are learned when they happen to you personally. Never trust anyone who claims they want to make you money and they are there to help you. Bullshit. They want to help themselves and make money off of you. People who consider unsolicited investment opportunities as scams and the people who contact them as scammers will be better off than individuals willing to hear them out and give it a try. It's a nasty world out there, so be careful. Don't be the small fish that gets eaten.
Those who fall victim to scams always think something is too hard for them to learn, which leads them to prefer that others do it for them, so they won't have to go through the difficulties. A mindset like this is what causes people to lose money.

I think people should develop the habit of seeing that they can do things for themselves, especially when it comes to money. In investing and trading, it is personal, and whoever claims to help people is only looking to make a gain. People will always make mistakes and regret it when they limit themselves to learning and think others do it better.



66. Post 67006339 (unedited backup) (by FinneysTrueVision) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 11:34:25 CEST 2026) in Lessons From the Biggest Bitcoin Losses in History.:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:25:12 AM
Now we have the Coldcard disaster that will forever change how we view cold storage. Despite the keys being generated offline and never touching the internet, hundreds of users lost over 1000 BTC in the last few days. The lesson learnt is that one line of code can be the difference between sufficient or insufficient amount of entropy. If it's the latter, it can have devastating consequences. In the future we will see greater focus on more complex key generation, like getting entropy from dice rolls. It will take more time but if the dice aren't biased it will be safer all-around.

I’ve seen people like Michael Saylor using this opportunity to tell people that it is better to put money in custodial ETFs, centralized exchanges and treasury company stocks. That is a completely wrong mentality. The ColdCard incident, as painful as it is to have to learn through devastating losses, will lead to better hardware wallet security and more thorough testing. Another important lesson is that when a developer is as hubristic and hostile as NVK, they should be scrutinized the hardest. Acting tough and untouchable isn’t going to protect anybody’s multi-million dollar fortune.



67. Post 67006051 (unedited backup) (by babo) (scraped on Mon Aug 3 09:25:25 CEST 2026) in [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana:

Quote from: Theymos DT update [thread]
Agosto 2026
Lista New Users:

Code:
theymos (CONFIRMED)
HostFat (CONFIRMED)
gmaxwell (CONFIRMED)
OgNasty (CONFIRMED)
vapourminer (CONFIRMED)
Foxpup (CONFIRMED)
philipma1957 (CONFIRMED)
babo (CONFIRMED)
Cyrus (CONFIRMED)
ibminer (CONFIRMED)
d5000 (CONFIRMED)
joker_josue (CONFIRMED)
Pmalek (CONFIRMED)
Mitchell (CONFIRMED)
albon (CONFIRMED)
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr (CONFIRMED)
gbianchi (CONFIRMED)
EFS (CONFIRMED)
hybridsole
stompix (CONFIRMED)
hilariousandco (CONFIRMED)
buckrogers (CONFIRMED)
Buchi-88 (CONFIRMED)
Lesbian Cow
JayJuanGee (CONFIRMED)
NeuroticFish (CONFIRMED)
achow101
DaveF
examplens (CONFIRMED)
nutildah (CONFIRMED)
irfan_pak10 (CONFIRMED)
yahoo62278 (CONFIRMED)
bitbollo (CONFIRMED)
zazarb
pooya87 (CONFIRMED)
LFC_Bitcoin (CONFIRMED)
o_solo_miner
mocacinno (CONFIRMED)
Real-Duke (CONFIRMED)
klarki (CONFIRMED)
LoyceV (CONFIRMED)
SFR10 (CONFIRMED)
Lucius
Lafu (CONFIRMED)
tweetious (CONFIRMED)
AakZaki (CONFIRMED)
giammangiato
buwaytress (CONFIRMED)
crwth (CONFIRMED)
Ale88 (CONFIRMED)
Kryptowerk
hosemary (CONFIRMED)
krogothmanhattan (CONFIRMED)
JollyGood (CONFIRMED)
igebotz (CONFIRMED)
roycilik (CONFIRMED)
CryptopreneurBrainboss (CONFIRMED)
hugeblack (CONFIRMED)
El duderino_ (CONFIRMED)
KTChampions (CONFIRMED)
Trofo (CONFIRMED)
icopress (CONFIRMED)
JeromeTash (CONFIRMED)
logfiles (CONFIRMED)
Bitcoin_Arena (CONFIRMED)
GazetaBitcoin (CONFIRMED)
tvplus006 (CONFIRMED)
mole0815
bitmover (CONFIRMED)
DdmrDdmr (CONFIRMED)
Husna QA (CONFIRMED)
Bthd
fillippone (CONFIRMED)
cryptofrka (CONFIRMED)
abhiseshakana (CONFIRMED)
The Cryptovator (CONFIRMED)
lovesmayfamilis (CONFIRMED)
DireWolfM14 (CONFIRMED)
notblox1 (CONFIRMED)
Little Mouse (CONFIRMED)
YOSHIE (CONFIRMED)
inspace (CONFIRMED)
jokers10 (CONFIRMED)
Awaklara (CONFIRMED)
geophphreigh
zasad@ (CONFIRMED)
Rikafip (CONFIRMED)
Etranger (CONFIRMED)
NotATether (CONFIRMED)
Stalker22 (CONFIRMED)
decodx
BlackHatCoiner (CONFIRMED)
Charles-Tim (CONFIRMED)
Lillominato89 (CONFIRMED)
Free Market Capitalist (CONFIRMED)
ZAINmalik75
YodasRedRocket (CONFIRMED)
SirJohnVonSlotty (CONFIRMED)


. . . . Lista Utenti Italiani:

USER.............DT....DT.July 2026.BPIPNinjastic
Ale88
(DT)
SI
arulbero
SI
babo
(DT)
SI
coinlocket$
no
fillippone
(DT)
SI
gbianchi
(DT)
SI
bastisisca
no
bitbollo
(DT)
SI
giammangiato
(DT)
no
mendace
no
mars78
no
simpic
no
Lillominato89
(DT)
SI


Link Utili: