Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:18:27 AM

I have a friend who does that. He is a poker guy and visits physical casinos to play poker, but he also likes to try his luck on slots. Before he starts playing at a machine, he will sit and watch to see which of the slots pay out money to previous players. He will not use those. His argument is: if a machine hasn't paid out anything for a while, but some others have, you should deposit at one that hasn't. The time has come for it to trigger a big win.

He just tries to play the probability game with assumption that if previous players did not win and get winning payments, perhaps it will turn to be winning round when he steps in and plays with that slot machine. He assumes that if other previous players won and got payment, there will be less probability for him to play, win and get payment if he actually uses his money for playing.

The assumption can be right but perhaps he will not wait a long time enough like a long time with many rounds of playing from previous players until he takes action. It's basically the probability game is based on big sample, not small one, so even in theory it is right, in his practice it would turn to be quite wrong.

Quote from: UmerIdrees on February 22, 2026, 11:25:18 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on February 22, 2026, 05:09:49 PM

Quote from: SageSwap on February 22, 2026, 08:38:36 AM

To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.

There aren't that many quality multi-coin software wallets that tick the important boxes, such as non-custodial and open-source. Exodus wallet only ticks one of them. Regardless, I have never felt like this is a good wallet. Every now and then, stories have pooped up involving mysterious "hacks" and the disappearance of funds from Exodus. I wouldn't want to use it. Cake Wallet and Unstoppable Wallet are perhaps a better pair of software wallets for multi-coin holders.

But still even if we use cake wallet or unstoppable wallet, our USD Tether can still be frozen, true ? I think it is by design that tether can freeze USDT from any wallet or exchange

Yes, but that was in response to the question of whether a centralized exchange could freeze BTC.

Quote from: qidafei on Today at 12:40:52 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on February 22, 2026, 05:09:49 PM

Quote from: SageSwap on February 22, 2026, 08:38:36 AM

To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.

Usually, I mostly use Trust Wallet. Does this also count as a non-custodial wallet?

I know Cake Wallet — I’ve used it before. When I stored my XRM, I used Cake Wallet.

Unfortunately, despite being non-custodial, Trust Wallet is not trustworthy. A few weeks ago, they were hacked and users lost several million dollars.

Earlier, I wrote that Exodus might also be a good option, but I take that back and also consider it a poor option after they stop support XMR. I really don't like that.

Cake Wallet is really great, but only their wallet, the rest of their services need more improvement.

Haaa Quake is better than sex !

*Hahem* Round 4 is now over, here are the results :

Closing price on 22/02/2026 : 67 585$

Name	Prediction	B/M	Final prediction	Difference
xLays	67 676,00		67 676,00	91,00
Leahized	67 367,00		67 367,00	218,00
GazetaBitcoin	67 323,00		67 323,00	262,00
LoyceV	67 852,05		67 852,05	267,05
Becassine	67 093,14		67 093,14	491,86
Mr. Magkaisa	66 666,66	0,5 bonus	67 000,00	585,00
Danydee	68 210,00		68 210,00	625,00
Pmalek	66 417,00		66 417,00	1 168,00
Doan9269	66 379,00		66 379,00	1 206,00
BABY SHOES	66 362,00		66 362,00	1 223,00
promise444c5	68 900,00		68 900,00	1 315,00
ESG	65 888,55		65 888,55	1 696,45
LogitechMouse	69 696,69		69 696,69	2 111,69
examplens	69 446,00	0,5 malus	69 793,00	2 208,00
cryptofrka	71 250,00		71 250,00	3 665,00

I start with the losers.
Cryptofrka, finishing last means you lose a life.
Examplens, the malus from the previous round almost got you in trouble. You avoided the last place, but you will have a 0.75% malus for the next round.
LogitechMouse, you thought you were safe, but you will have a 0.50% malus for the next round.
ESG, you are the luckiest of the unlucky, you will only get a small malus of 0.25% for the next round.

Quad Damage is now disabled... Mmmmm... wait.

Congratulations xLays, you are the big winner of this round. Your account has been credited with 50BTC.

But what kind of player are you ? A player with panache, a showman ? Or a more defensive player, ...a coward ?
I have a deal to offer you that will determine round 5 :
A : Do you want round 5 to be a round without additional rules and therefore a boring round ?
B : Or do you want to activate double Quad Damage for round 5 ? It's like round 4, but everything will be doubled, so 8 players will be affected. There are only 17 players, so you could be among the 8 players affected by the double Quad Damage, but it would be a good way to eliminate or accelerate the fall of other players.

So xLays, what is your choice ? a or the beautiful B ?

Quote from: Rikafip on February 04, 2026, 09:37:30 AM

Afaik it hasn't been decided yet, but icopress said it will be either February 25th or 27th.

So, there are also 6 days left for editing (28 Feb max). We only have about 100 applications, so the distribution will actually look something like this:

20 spots for $150
30 spots for $100

Or I'll just put together a list of all the long answers that will be eligible for a $250 x10 prize and a list of short answers that will be eligible for $50 x 10 prizes.

People write casino and exchange reviews for $50, spending an hour or more... but they overlook... putting in 5 minutes of time has a 30% chance of getting $100-150 for one post (in fact, I think that's too generous an offer).

But if someone thinks their vote will be counted based on writing one line under each nomination, they're mistaken. That's what I mean by a detailed answer. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569520.msg66342957#msg66342957

Sorry if I mentioned anyone by mistake... I just exported a list of those who wrote at least 1 post.

Code:

1. icopress: 1 posts
2. Bigjoe33: 1 posts
3. Pmalek: 1 posts
4. The Sceptical Chymist: 1 posts
5. bitmover: 1 posts
6. joker_josue: 1 posts
7. redhack: 1 posts
8. *Ace*: 1 posts
9. ABCbits: 1 posts
10. AprilioMP: 1 posts
11. BABY SHOES: 1 posts
12. Barikui1: 1 posts
13. Bright0515: 1 posts
14. Btcdeybodi: 1 posts
15. DaNNy001: 1 posts
16. Donneski: 1 posts
17. Dreadboost: 1 posts
18. EFS: 1 posts
19. Fivestar4everMVP: 1 posts
20. Floczy: 1 posts
21. Foxpup: 1 posts
22. GeorgeJohn: 1 posts
23. GiftedMAN: 1 posts
24. Jaycoinz: 1 posts
25. Karl_3000: 1 posts
26. KingsDen: 1 posts
27. LFC_Bitcoin: 1 posts
28. Lida93: 1 posts
29. Lillominato89: 1 posts
30. MAAManda: 1 posts
31. MainIbem: 1 posts
32. Majestic-milf: 1 posts
33. Mhizlove: 1 posts
34. MorganaX: 1 posts
35. Nathrixxx: 1 posts
36. NeuroticFish: 1 posts
37. NotATether: 1 posts
38. Obim34: 1 posts
39. Odohu: 1 posts
40. Ojima-ojo: 1 posts
41. Pablo-wood: 1 posts
42. Peanutswar: 1 posts
43. Perfectbaby: 1 posts
44. Rockstarguy: 1 posts
45. SamReomo: 1 posts
46. SatoPrincess: 1 posts
47. Satofan44: 1 posts
48. Sexylizzy2813: 1 posts
49. Sir_Garry55: 1 posts
50. Su-asa: 1 posts
51. Tinubu: 1 posts
52. Tmoonz: 1 posts
53. TryNinja: 1 posts
54. TypoTonic: 1 posts
55. Victorybit1: 1 posts
56. Wakate: 1 posts
57. Wake Up: 1 posts
58. Woodie: 1 posts
59. adultcrypto: 1 posts
60. aipercoin: 1 posts
61. apogio: 1 posts
62. babo: 1 posts
63. banana33: 1 posts
64. bangjoe: 1 posts
65. bastisisca: 1 posts
66. bitbollo: 1 posts
67. blomen: 1 posts
68. bubilas: 1 posts
69. cande86: 1 posts
70. changaa: 1 posts
71. criptoevangelista: 1 posts
72. d5000: 1 posts
73. dkbit98: 1 posts
74. dollyamo: 1 posts
75. examplens: 1 posts
76. famososMuertos: 1 posts
77. fillippone: 1 posts
78. fluffaloo: 1 posts
79. giorgione: 1 posts
80. imthegreat: 1 posts
81. justinlamode: 1 posts
82. kennycryptoitalia: 1 posts
83. lovesmayfamilis: 1 posts
84. m2017: 1 posts
85. m4r1o: 1 posts
86. martinom: 1 posts
87. mv1986: 1 posts
88. nesterok228: 1 posts
89. notblox1: 1 posts
90. nutildah: 1 posts
91. obuoma: 1 posts
92. pewboy: 1 posts
93. promise444c5: 1 posts
94. rachael9385: 1 posts
95. sabotag3x: 1 posts
96. sotelorene: 1 posts
97. summonerrk: 1 posts
98. verdinio: 1 posts
99. wangjie110: 1 posts
100. xLays: 1 posts
101. xenomorfo: 1 posts
102. yahoo62278: 1 posts
103. zasad@: 1 posts

Quote from: Pmalek on February 22, 2026, 05:09:49 PM

Quote from: SageSwap on February 22, 2026, 08:38:36 AM

To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.

Usually, I mostly use Trust Wallet. Does this also count as a non-custodial wallet?

I know Cake Wallet — I’ve used it before. When I stored my XRM, I used Cake Wallet.

Summary of the Dispute
The forum thread on Bitcointalk.org (titled "[UNRESOLVED] Betpanda.io SCAM 18.2mBTC") centers on a complaint by user T1HGO against the online crypto casino Betpanda.io. T1HGO claims the casino scammed him out of approximately 18.2 mBTC (around €1,550 at the time) by rejecting his withdrawal request on April 27, 2025, locking his account, and later permanently closing it under the pretext of "suspicious betting behavior." The thread, which started on May 7, 2025, and spans one page with 20 posts, remains unresolved. It involves back-and-forth between T1HGO, a representative from Betpanda.io, and several forum users who mostly side with the accuser.
Key Parties

Accuser (T1HGO): A player who deposited funds, placed bets on Dota 2 esports matches, built up winnings, and attempted to withdraw. He argues the casino's actions were fraudulent to avoid paying out.
Accused (Betpanda.io): The casino, which defends the account closure and fund forfeiture as a legitimate enforcement of their Terms and Conditions (ToC), specifically their anti-fraud policy.

Arguments and Evidence from T1HGO
T1HGO describes a sequence of events starting with a quick withdrawal rejection (within 30 seconds), followed by an account lock and a KYC (Know Your Customer) request. He submitted documents promptly but waited over a week for a response. The casino then emailed him stating his account was closed due to a breach flagged by their sportsbook provider, Betby, with all funds forfeited. Key points from his side:

He denies any suspicious activity, emphasizing his bets were standard wagers on Dota 2 matches (mostly underdogs with even odds and consistent stakes like 0.1-0.5 mBTC per bet).
Evidence includes:
A blockchain transaction showing a deposit of 0.0025 BTC (2.5 mBTC) to the casino, confirming at least part of his activity.
Screenshots of his betting history, which he claims show normal behavior (e.g., bets on match winners, no unusual patterns like arbitrage or rapid in-play adjustments).
Proof of successful withdrawals from other Betby-powered casinos (e.g., CryptoLeo and FortuneJack) shortly after, including one on May 8, 2025, to argue that Betby didn't flag him system-wide—only at Betpanda.io.
A related complaint on CasinoGuru, which was dismissed not because his case lacked merit, but due to the mediator's admitted lack of expertise in evaluating sports betting investigations: "Since we don't have enough insight into this field of online gambling, we wouldn't be able to interpret the casino's results of the investigation and/or their explanation correctly and judge this case fairly."

Quote: "This is a lie, and a scam. I am 100% certain I did not breach any terms and conditions, and my betting behavior is not suspicious at all. They are just hiding behind the provider to be able to steal money from people."

Arguments and Evidence from Betpanda.io
Betpanda.io's representative responded on May 9, 2025, denying any scam and citing their ToC clause on anti-fraud:

They claim the breach involved "betting techniques designed to circumvent the standard house edge," flagged by Betby. Specifically, bets were placed "right at the same moment when the event occurred or extremely close to it," implying possible exploitation of timing or latency.
They state they aren't required to share more details, as Betby handles investigations and provides limited info to them.
No concrete evidence was provided, such as timestamps, bet logs, or specifics on which bets were flagged. They reiterated the decision is final.
Quote: "The suspicious bets were placed right at the same moment when the event occurred or extremely close to it. I'm only able to provide you with as much details as Betby shares with us, and this is the extent we receive."

Community Opinions
Forum users (e.g., albon, Trêvoid, holydarkness, AHOYBRAUSE, Pmalek, Zwei) largely support T1HGO, criticizing Betpanda.io for vagueness, lack of proof, and a pattern of similar issues. Points raised:

Dota 2 esports has built-in streaming delays (e.g., 15 minutes), no live crowds, and no way to exploit real-time events like "courtsiding" (betting from the venue before broadcast).
Bets appear normal: Consistent stakes, even odds, no signs of fraud like varying bet sizes or focusing on obscure markets.
References to Betpanda.io's poor reputation, including low ratings (e.g., 4.6/10 on CasinoGuru, 2.7/5 on Trustpilot) and multiple unresolved complaints on sites like AskGamblers and other Bitcointalk threads.
Links to similar accusations, such as another thread where a user lost over $3,000 in a near-identical scenario (delayed withdrawal, KYC, then breach cited with no details, funds retained).

Who Is Right?
Based on the thread, supporting evidence, and broader context from complaints across multiple platforms, T1HGO is right—the casino's actions appear unjustified and indicative of a scam to retain winnings. Here's why:

Lack of Transparency from Betpanda.io: Their explanation is vague and unsubstantiated. They refuse to provide specifics (e.g., which bets, exact timings) despite T1HGO sharing his full history. Hiding behind Betby without evidence suggests evasion rather than a legitimate flag.
Inconsistencies in the Accusation: The "timing" claim doesn't hold for Dota 2, as forum users correctly note—events are digital, with delays, making real-time exploitation implausible. T1HGO's bets (from descriptions) show no red flags like in-play abuse or arbitrage.
Pattern of Behavior: This isn't isolated. Betpanda.io has a history of account closures after wins, fund confiscations with generic "breach" excuses, and ignoring complaints. Ratings on review sites are low, with recurring themes of "sudden blocks" and "no proof given." Even mediators like CasinoGuru couldn't resolve due to the casino's opacity, not player fault.
Supporting Evidence for T1HGO: His deposits are verifiable, bets seem routine, and he succeeded on other Betby sites—undermining the idea of a universal flag.
Casino's Licensing and Practices: Operating under a weak Costa Rica license (not robust regulation), Betpanda.io has broad ToC discretion, which appears abused here.

While casinos have the right to enforce rules against fraud, Betpanda.io's handling lacks credibility. This fits a scam pattern: Accept deposits, let players win, then seize funds with minimal justification. Avoid this casino based on the evidence.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 05:09:49 PM

Quote from: SageSwap on Today at 08:38:36 AM

To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.

But still even if we use cake wallet or unstoppable wallet, our USD Tether can still be frozen, true ? I think it is by design that tether can freeze USDT from any wallet or exchange, i don't know why people still trust them too much. By trusting in mean look at the marketcap of the USDT and Dai, people still hesitent to put the funds in DAI, i wonder why Huh

Quote from: Pmalek on February 04, 2026, 08:25:10 AM

Quote from: Rruchi man on February 03, 2026, 07:20:43 PM

I don't play crash games, but I have noticed that they are becoming popular and even as addictive as slot games are. I think they have the attention because of how quickly you know if you have won or lost. I guess this is what people are getting to like, that is, playing games where the outcome is quick and they don't have to wait, like sportsbet.

Does anyone think interest in these sorts of games where the outcome is quick will threaten interest in games that you have to wait for the outcome?

I don't think so. Personally, I have always found sports betting to be more entertaining than playing casino games. It's been like that since I was a teen and I doubt it will change now. But if I had to choose between playing slots or crash games, like the mentioned Aviator, I would pick crash games. It feels like it's easier to win or cash out in time if you are happy with the multiplier.

Sports betting has always been more fun for me too, same as you since my teenage days. But honestly, if i had to choose, i’d go with slots. Crash just feels too fast. Sometimes you don’t even properly look at the screen and the plane already crashes at 1.00x Cheesy

Slots are also quick, but at least something is happening , you’ve got animations, different themes, bonus rounds, all kinds of game patterns I’ve tried both, and i can’t say crash games are bad, not at all. I just feel like slots are a bit more entertaining overall

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 05:00:45 PM

I won a freebet on Rainbet some time ago. I decided to try my luck betting on the finals of the Olympic ice hockey competition and on Canada. The odds of 2.36 looked really nice and I though they would surely defeat the US team despite Crosby being out. Unfortunately that didn't happen. They were the better team throughout the match and had great opportunities to score a 2:1 goal during regular time. MacKinnon especially, but also Toews missed big opportunities. The match went into overtime and the US scored the game-winning goal not long after it started.

Better luck next time I guess.

TThe 2 freebets I got before also ended tragically and this is the world of gambling that sometimes it will look easy but it will be much more difficult than we expect.
But luck can come at any time and we just need to try again with better preparedness.

This week I got a freebet and I want to make sure this freebet goes well especially since it seems like this week is a pretty good week for me because all my bets went as expected.

My 3 bets including 2 for Garcia went well and there is 1 more bet that I am waiting for at under 3.5 goals and it is currently halfway through and only waiting for the remaining 2 matches.

Another round number from Pmalek, congratulations on 9000. Cheesy

Quote from: Yamane_Keto on February 21, 2026, 12:14:15 PM

That's true, but not all decentralized liquidity protocols are truly decentralized, nor do they all implement policies to prevent the seizure or blocking of funds. Thorswap is a good example for that Thorswap partner frozen 10 BTC?
provide a list of the liquidity providers you plan to use is better

I am currently discussing this issue with my superiors, and we may publish a list. The final decision on this matter will be made on Monday, as my superiors are currently on holiday.
The only thing I can say for sure right now is that we are currently connecting NEAR intens, which is mentioned in the article, for small amounts of money, as they have very low fees for small amounts, and for large amounts we will only use protocols that do not have the possibility of withholding.

We will assume all risks associated with the use of NEAR intens, and in a case similar to the one described in the article, we will make compensation from our own funds. We are also preparing changes to the ToS and FAQ. If such cases involve small amounts, we will consider other protocols for small amounts as well.

Quote from: Yamane_Keto on February 21, 2026, 12:14:15 PM

jud-ex uses a short order ID, which can be easily compromised.

No, it is not sufficient to know the order identifier to view the order ID. If you switch from another browser or device to this order, you will also need to enter the recipient's wallet to view the payment details.

Quote from: Yamane_Keto on February 21, 2026, 12:14:15 PM

How will service fees be calculated? Will they go directly to the liquidity provider or will they be deducted from it?

The most commonly used model is one where, when creating an order on the liquidity provider's side, we specify our commission, which is transferred to our wallet after a successful exchange.

However, there are also suppliers who have other remuneration models based on a percentage commission.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 21, 2026, 04:28:10 PM

@jud-ex
All that which you wrote above sounds nice but without knowing your liquidity partners, you are asking us to trust you that everything will be all right and will work exactly as you said. As Yamane_Keto explained, there have been examples where services that look like they are decentralized (and probably promote themselves as such) have turned out to posses freezing options. NEAR Intents, for example. In theory, the same can happen with your liquidity partner(s), which at this point remain a secret.

No, there were no changes in NEAR Intens; they initially had built-in functions to hold funds in case of non-compliance with AML requirements. Thus, there are systems in which this function was built in initially, and there are systems that do not have fund holding functions, and all of this is documented.

Quote from: Upgrade00 on February 21, 2026, 04:40:07 PM

You should include it in your website as communication channels not reviews it doesn't matter if it was made by customers or users dropped replies on the thread. As I mentioned reviews should ideally be done independently by an external source. Reviews come naturally as your service grows and attracts more users.

Thank you for clarifying. You are correct. We have made changes and removed kycnot.me from the ‘Reviews about us’ section.

Quote from: NotATether on February 21, 2026, 10:45:26 PM

I would like to test your exchange for addition to BitMixList. Would you be available for contact?

Thank you! Yes, we are interested. Please write to us at the contact details below or via private message on the forum.
Email: info@jud-ex.com
Telegram: @Jud_ex

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:53:19 AM

Quote from: StereoSwap on February 21, 2026, 09:19:39 PM

Each swap is processed per order. That does not make us a trustless protocol, and we are not claiming to be one. It means we do not custody user assets beyond the technical execution of a specific swap.

That's custodial. You have custody of the funds while the exchange takes place. You control the outcome. Once you send those coins to a client, they belong to them. But the latter part is irrelevant.

I think StereoSwap means that they so not have a wallet for each user, where users can deposit funds for trading and later on withdrawal.

I agree with Pmalek, using the term "non custodial" exchange isn't precise.

The only way we could have a non custodial swap/exchange would be using smartcontracts, like uniswap, Jupiter , sushiswap , etc.. shihc isn't the case

Quote from: qidafei on February 21, 2026, 09:54:18 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on February 21, 2026, 04:36:40 PM

Quote from: SamReomo on February 21, 2026, 12:59:08 PM

I believe it's better to go for Dai option than choosing LUSD as Dai is still accepted on many platforms and its liquidity is also higher than LUSD. Both of those are better when we compare those to USDT, but people often use or prefer USDT because it's accepted everywhere. I also use USDT for trading at centralized exchanges and to be honest, I've not yet faced any issue with it. However, I would never withdraw funds in form of USDT because for me Bitcoin works better than others.

USDT is the most battle-tested. Let's call it that. It remains the most popular option worldwide. But like I said previously. If you still have access to USDT, DAI and some other non-compliant stablecoins (according to EU regulators) on the CEXs you use, that means you are not residing in the European Union. EU citizens can't use either of the two on CEXs. Unless it's a smaller exchange or the CEX doesn't care, of course. USDC is the most popular EU-compliant stablecoin.

Now I’m thinking about something: if I use SageSwap.io to exchange my Bitcoin for DAI and then deposit it into my centralized exchange (CEX), is there a risk that my account could be frozen?

From what I previously understood, whether you receive ETH or Bitcoin, there is always a chance of receiving tokens that have been flagged — for example, high-risk or tainted tokens. That could potentially lead to an account being frozen.

I’ve never used DAI before, so I’d like to understand the situation better.

Centralized exchanges can freeze any of your coins, regardless of whether they are USDT, DAI or BTC.

To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.

If you exchange Bitcoin > DAI with us, there is no chance that your funds will be frozen, because they will not be linked to any theft or anything like that. The only option is that your account will be frozen for another reason like suspicion of money laundering.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:36:40 PM

Quote from: SamReomo on Today at 12:59:08 PM

Thank you everyone for sharing — I’ve learned a lot. I also looked into DAI. It seems much better than LUSD, because on many apps you can purchase DAI directly.

Now I’m thinking about something: if I use SageSwap.io to exchange my Bitcoin for DAI and then deposit it into my centralized exchange (CEX), is there a risk that my account could be frozen?

From what I previously understood, whether you receive ETH or Bitcoin, there is always a chance of receiving tokens that have been flagged — for example, high-risk or tainted tokens. That could potentially lead to an account being frozen.

I’ve never used DAI before, so I’d like to understand the situation better.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 20, 2026, 07:57:44 AM

Your FAQ section is incomplete. It doesn't answer any of the questions asked.
I don't see a Terms of Service or Privacy Policy on your website. How do you deal with AML issues?

You claim that users retain control throughout the entire swap process. Can you tell us how that works exactly? Once I make a deposit to one of your addresses, how do I get my coins back without your intervention if I change my mind and decide not to carry out the swap before it was initiated?

Thx for pointing this out.

Right, when we first pushed the production version live, the FAQ was still being finalized and the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy had not yet been published. We were completing frontend adjustments and documentation updates at that time, minor front-end improvements are still ongoing!

All of this has now been added. The FAQ is updated, and both the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy are live on the website.

Regarding AML: we do not operate under a KYC policy and we do not request identity verification from users.

On custody: users remain in control until they send funds. Once a deposit is confirmed, the swap is executed automatically. We do not hold balances or require manual intervention.

The swap engine has always been functioning correctly, the recent changes were strictly frontend and documentation refinements.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:19:38 AM

LUSD probably has an even lower acceptance rate than the rest of the stablecoins. Liquidity is a federation, more decentralized than the one shot-caller rules we have in popular stalecoins.

17. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (441 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 13813: smooth (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 14716: rb1205 (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 15510: Mousepotato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 16248: SolarSilver (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 18595: 2weiX (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (7 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 18640: SebastianJu (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (83 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 18953: Stemby (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 19971: -ck (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (701 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 20300: Otoh (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 20651: coblee (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (365 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 22698: gwillen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 23092: malevolent (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (728 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 23810: yxt (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 24140: qwk (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (2539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 25960: smoothie (Trust: +30 / =1 / -0) (495 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 27427: ziomik (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (12 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 27470: cygan (Trust: +62 / =2 / -0) (10812 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 27870: JoelKatz (Trust: neutral) (12 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 29642: Lincoln6Echo (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (63 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 30964: Spotswood (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 31288: John (John K.) (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (236 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 31410: ercolinux (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 31539: Michail1 (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (165 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 33107: ssateneth (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 33155: tiCeR (Trust: neutral) (504 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 34692: fronti (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (310 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 34894: risho (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 35501: cAPSLOCK (Trust: neutral) (6213 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 36455: picchio (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 37502: rdponticelli (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 38894: SaltySpitoon (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 41175: infofront (Trust: neutral) (2095 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 41911: BadBear (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 43172: mrkent (Trust: neutral) (6 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 43526: ocminer (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 44673: ninjarobot (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 47656: P_Shep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (408 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 48856: minimalB (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 49008: jojo69 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4281 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 51478: mezzomix (Trust: neutral) (309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 52440: ailikun (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 55122: DiamondCardz (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 55503: squall1066 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 57872: diego1000 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 58711: Entropy-uc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 60791: lassdas (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (511 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 60820: DannyHamilton (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (4359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 62955: odolvlobo (Trust: neutral) (2747 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 64205: Carlton Banks (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2100 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 65034: dozerz (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 65636: babo (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (4539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 65716: CoinEraser (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 67210: Richy_T (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1808 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 68448: KonstantinosM (Trust: neutral) (263 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 70535: KWH (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (82 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 71414: mnightwaffle (Trust: +13 / =4 / -0) (14 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 71769: kelpy (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 73619: GIANNAT (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 74263: BG4 (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 76216: Cripto (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 79608: Flying Hellfish (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 80081: hephaist0s (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (34 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 80810: solosequenosenada (Trust: neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 81572: Milquetoast (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 81962: monkeynuts (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (259 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 82709: Coinfan (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 86549: alexrossi (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (808 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 86948: Minor Miner (Trust: neutral) (95 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 87930: bitserve (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1522 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 88912: 600watt (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 90255: Queenvio (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
96. 93954: The_Catman (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
97. 94840: fluffypony (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
98. 95042: BigBitz (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
99. 97179: joeperry (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (451 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
100. 98986: TMAN (Trust: +22 / =1 / -1) (1308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
101. 99165: Searing (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (821 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
102. 99837: HeRetiK (Trust: neutral) (1821 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
103. 102795: kurious (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (749 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
104. 103764: Evilish (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (64 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
105. 104297: kimosan (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
106. 107601: pmorici (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
107. 107762: NLNico (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (313 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
108. 107855: Wed (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
109. 109430: TookDk (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (62 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
110. 110383: Bytekiller (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
111. 110642: hanspeter77 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
112. 111872: Deathwing (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (329 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
113. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (8478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
114. 112568: Adriano (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
115. 115075: bitwhizz (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
116. 115423: Micio (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
117. 120694: xhomerx10 (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (9776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
118. 120714: gdassori (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
119. 120821: ghibly79 (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (6 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
120. 120837: vizique (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
121. 121796: alani123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
122. 122882: klintay (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
123. 123869: wttbs (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (109 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
124. 124440: btct22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
125. 125583: tokeweed (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (600 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
126. 129764: Ticked (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
127. 130358: c4shm3n (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
128. 130792: sidehack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (871 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
129. 131351: djjacket (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
130. 133846: monbux (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (29 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
131. 134226: Nestade (Trust: neutral) (783 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
132. 134378: Blazed (Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
133. 136722: yakuza699 (Trust: neutral) (13 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
134. 138541: nrg1zer (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
135. 138940: minifrij (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (269 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
136. 139004: eneloop (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (40 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
137. 139027: alp (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
138. 144671: unick (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:34:41 AM

Do you have plans to create a TOR version of your exchange?

We are currently working in this direction, and the TOR domain will be launched in the coming days.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:34:41 AM

Jud-ex uses different protocols as liquidity providers for swaps. Does the user have the option to select which protocol to use when they perform an exchange? If not, could you list which ones you use?

You obviously can't guarantee what the future will hold for the third-party liquidity providers you use. Tomorrow, they might decide to perform AML checks, request KYC, and perhaps even start freezing user funds. You even mention in your TOS that you can't be blamed if something like that happens. That's another reason why I think users should know where the liquidity comes from, so they can accept or refuse to use that route.

I want to clarify an important architectural point about how our exchange routes trades and why neither we nor any underlying liquidity source can arbitrarily “hold” user funds.

Here’s the key idea:

🔹 1. Your funds never go anywhere permanently
When a user initiates a swap, the assets are not sent to any custody account owned by us or by the liquidity source. Instead, your assets are:
• technically sent to a smart contract/liquidity pool
• immediately used to execute the swap
• then returned to you as the output asset without delay
There is no “holding” period — the transaction is atomic, meaning it either succeeds and completes in one go, or it fails and reverts immediately.

🔹 2. Even if a blockchain protocol adds compliance, it can’t freeze funds mid-swap
The decentralized liquidity protocols we use cannot seize or withhold funds solely because of AML/KYC policies, because:
• The smart contract logic doesn’t grant them custodial power to confiscate assets.
• They can filter access to their RPC/UI or block sanctioned addresses, but that doesn’t change the fact that the swap is executed as a single blockchain transaction.
• In decentralized swaps, if a transaction is not valid (e.g., due to blocked address), it simply fails and is reverted — meaning the user keeps their original funds automatically.

There is no ability to sit on tokens or lock them up unless the user explicitly signs a transaction agreeing to such behavior (which ours does not).

🔹 3. Our architecture doesn’t give any third party control over assets
We route swaps through decentralized liquidity — but we do not custody your funds at any point. That’s fundamentally different from a centralized exchange holding balances on its books.

🔹 4. Why we don’t name specific protocols
For competitive and security reasons, we do not publicly disclose the individual liquidity protocols we integrate with. This ensures that:
• competitors cannot easily copy or replicate our routing strategies
• we maintain flexibility to swap or upgrade liquidity sources as needed
• we avoid exposing sensitive technical details that do not affect users directly

So in short:

✔️ There is no mechanism for a third-party protocol in the swap pipeline to hold your funds
✔️ If a protocol were to implement any kind of compliance blocking, the swap would simply fail & revert
✔️ The user always either receives swapped assets OR keeps the original funds

Quote from: howardsentell on February 20, 2026, 04:45:22 AM

Free Raffle: Spotlight on Polymerbit Physical Bitcoin Collectibles 🎉🎉

Hey everyone I am excited to start this raffle celebrating one player in the world of physical Bitcoin collectibles. Polymerbit turns assets into real touchable pieces that any fan would love to own. The raffle will bring the community together. Give us a chance to have fun BTC

A Quick Look at the Creator: 👀

🌟 Dan CEO of Polymerbit has created over 100 unique note designs. His work has received recognition from grading institutions and the largest auction companies and is even part of The British Museums collection. His collectibles attract enthusiasts who value the blend of art design and emerging technology. Dan is well liked and respected on the forum. https://www.polymerbit.com/

This creator is making more than products they are the core of the community. Polymerbit shows the HODL attitude with knowledge, grit, and passion.

🗓️ Drawing DATE: Circle March 1, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST on your agendas. To keep it fair and transparent, I will use RandomPicker, Bitlist, or a similar service for the draw.

🎁 Prizes Up for Grabs:

2025 Polymerbit Cryptovalley (Zug) 2 Milli BTC Series 4 FUNDED. Limited to 50 notes. This note will be funded after the winner receives.

👉 How to ENTER:

The raffle has 100 slots.

The raffle will still take place even if not all the slots are filled. Winners will be notified via DM or in the thread. If the prizes are unclaimed after five days or the winner cannot be reached, the gifts will be offered to the next runner-up.

Enter your chosen number (like #42) and your username. The entries follow the first-come, first-served rules. Each member is allowed one entry. No alts allowed.

01 - bitbollo
2
03 - guy369
4
05 - 5tift
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 - 2stout
14 - doblezero
15 - geo
16
17 - Cointxz
18
19 - thebtcdoctor
20
21 - swatcheesehead
22
23 - Primo-bit
24 - Mindyspace
25
26
27 - CasBrowser
28 - finitemaz
29
30
31 - Pmalek
32
33 - cygan
34
35
36
37
38 - Pumared
39 - Remsjack
40
41
42 - tweetious
43
44 - finitebydesign
45 - tvplus006
46 - fillippone
47
48
49
50
51
52
53 - Phoolsh
54
55
56 - estoneee
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64 - Baseplate
65
66
67 - akeyva
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83 - T-Chad
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100

Have a ₿lessed raffle BTC Visit their website and tip your hat to the innovators. I am looking forward to March 1, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST. Let us sustain the energy going 🚀.

Disclaimer: This free raffle is provided as-is with no purchase necessary. The organizer may make changes and is not liable for errors, omissions, or technical issues. Let's make this raffle epic!

Weekly update (2026-02-13_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1770950782 2 5129604.msg66386075 1166480 915315
1770950644 1 5456516.msg66401693 317618 3380863
1770950622 1 5456516.msg66397756 317618 401014
1770950223 3 178336.msg66400325 1067333 148567
1770949982 1 5574309.msg66401692 30747 2561166
1770949876 2 5452055.msg66401387 1166480 1311641
1770949562 2 5570090.msg66401596 1166480 1028592
1770949495 1 5574309.msg66401692 3719408 2561166
1770948518 1 5574218.msg66401976 30747 3561516
1770948421 1 5574214.msg66397898 3611603 35
1770948225 1 178336.msg66402376 64507 120694
1770947696 1 178336.msg66402296 120694 252510
1770945652 1 5357434.msg66402355 3645972 1045971
1770945571 1 5571422.msg66391932 831523 938833
1770944881 1 5574320.msg66402303 33156 2003859
1770944833 1 5568408.msg66275198 33156 64507
1770944769 1 5568408.msg66183266 33156 359716
1770944751 1 5568408.msg66180875 33156 2724574
1770944623 1 178336.msg66402334 33156 64507
1770943981 1 178336.msg66402261 64507 120694
1770943454 1 5547264.msg66402287 30747 192825
1770943143 2 5357434.msg66402302 1045971 3688462
1770941879 1 178336.msg66402261 252510 120694
1770940546 1 178336.msg66401677 252510 3704398
1770939812 1 5574228.msg66402180 3380863 3673053
1770939566 1 5357434.msg66402189 3567660 1045971
1770939271 1 5574188.msg66397027 3611472 3724193
1770938846 1 5574306.msg66401709 33156 2561166
1770938580 1 178336.msg66401303 252510 1089623
1770938570 1 5574309.msg66401948 33156 3380863
1770938531 1 178336.msg66401291 252510 35501
1770938230 4 5574309.msg66401692 33156 2561166
1770938070 1 5574214.msg66401906 33156 64507
1770937624 1 5574309.msg66401692 1365271 2561166
1770937361 1 178336.msg66401251 252510 1089623
1770937330 1 5574159.msg66401999 849498 782805
1770937321 1 5574159.msg66396350 849498 745781
1770936876 1 178336.msg66401677 33156 3704398
1770936815 1 5573881.msg66386959 1016855 3704391
1770936726 1 178336.msg66401035 252510 223922
1770935890 1 5573581.msg66375034 3240980 346731
1770935791 1 5574170.msg66398349 3490661 3670744
1770935729 1 5574309.msg66401948 401014 3380863
1770935691 1 5574159.msg66396350 639420 745781
1770935574 1 5574041.msg66400717 1668017 33156
1770935040 1 178336.msg66400325 252510 148567
1770934925 5 5574309.msg66401692 401014 2561166
1770934553 1 5574214.msg66399173 64507 459836
1770934483 2 5564428.msg66005246 1052091 3687196
1770934452 1 5571009.msg66274851 1052091 3740136
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (55 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2626 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 13 Feb 2026 03:46:22 AM CET, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 2 Merit to hedgeh0g (history) for Re: Bitcoin vs Золото vs Фиат.
On Fri 13 Feb 2026 03:44:04 AM CET, nutildah (history) sent 1 Merit to SatoPrincess (history) for Re: AI Spam Report Reference Thread.
On Fri 13 Feb 2026 03:43:42 AM CET, nutildah (history) sent 1 Merit to Ultegra134 (history) for Re: AI Spam Report Reference Thread.
On Fri 13 Feb 2026 03:37:03 AM CET, El duderino_ (history) sent 3 Merit to lightfoot (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 13 Feb 2026 03:33:02 AM CET, Vod (history) sent 1 Merit to PrimeNumber7 (history) for I found an AI .
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (577 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8339 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 878 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3746294: tcatm2 (history) earned: 10 Merit.
3746381: flowingcapital (history) earned: 5 Merit.
3746499: kazikbalaganiarz (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3746729: evgpokrow (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3746871: xdxiug (history) earned: 3 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3742931: elvisjedusor
3742965: Moeralife11
3743001: DuelbitsPredict
3743117: Crypto_Timothy
3743165: bnavf
3743230: cyberopsxx
3743238: adv3ntur0us
3743293: Frankwitzer
3743309: Maestrobigbrock777
3743325: Betmoco
3743339: justyourcasualtrader
3743344: NKminer66
3743503: Mateomateomateo
3743530: gaelium
3743536: valen_koinly
3743655: ZaynOsmanAli
3743791: Dimazdan
3743800: MagnificentX
3743918: Temnayanoch
3743964: melina710
3743974: banktobtc
3744238: Lal_bitcoin
3744348: FiatSystemHater2009
3744376: Abdullah6969
3744379: Vihaanraviii
3744432: Akuma_
3744448: JANEEY555
3744480: WeLiveCrypto
3744506: ModuloMadBTC
3744519: Paney_Thrill
3744614: Coldstreak
3744691: Antikyc_
3744714: lukezio
3744763: topcaz
3744888: khbinversion
3744958: Invariant Core
3745143: Vaeldraux
3745203: cephalopod
3745458: goblintester
3745514: HighwayLost81
3745612: cLoazyL
3745615: viruz06
3745871: Lethobios
3746105: Dicey12
3746177: wavelife1
3746294: tcatm2
3746381: flowingcapital
3746499: kazikbalaganiarz
3746729: evgpokrow
3746871: xdxiug

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8339
4:0:878
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:773
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14263:14141
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:301
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1462
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3742931:0:1
3742965:0:1
3743001:0:2
3743117:0:5
3743165:0:1
3743230:0:3
3743238:0:4
3743293:1:13
3743309:0:3
3743325:1:15
3743339:0:2
3743344:0:1
3743503:0:1
3743530:0:1
3743536:0:2
3743655:0:2
3743791:0:2
3743800:0:6
3743918:0:1
3743964:0:4
3743974:0:12
3744238:3:7
3744348:1:2
3744376:0:1
3744379:0:2
3744432:2:34
3744448:0:1
3744480:0:5
3744506:0:9
3744519:0:2
3744614:6:12
3744691:0:2
3744714:0:1
3744763:0:1
3744888:0:5
3744958:0:2
3745143:0:1
3745203:0:3
3745458:1:13
3745514:0:11
3745612:0:5
3745615:0:1
3745871:0:1
3746105:0:1
3746177:0:1
3746294:0:10
3746381:0:5
3746499:0:1
3746729:0:2
3746871:0:3

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50963
Sample

Code:

1. 20186 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1098 unique users in 11629 transactions
2. 19901 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 741 unique users in 10905 transactions
3. 18882 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9982 transactions
4. 15176 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8748 transactions
5. 14141 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1220 unique users in 5067 transactions
6. 12969 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 709 unique users in 8653 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11692 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 573 unique users in 4489 transactions
9. 11529 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 488 unique users in 6408 transactions
10. 11250 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6445 transactions
11. 11226 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6529 transactions
12. 10812 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 502 unique users in 5637 transactions
13. 10433 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 573 unique users in 5977 transactions
14. 9776 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 329 unique users in 5022 transactions
15. 9525 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 630 unique users in 5151 transactions
16. 9464 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 519 unique users in 4393 transactions
17. 9380 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 335 unique users in 3359 transactions
18. 9371 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 452 unique users in 4683 transactions
19. 9257 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 432 unique users in 5054 transactions
20. 9250 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 537 unique users in 4195 transactions
21. 9183 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 391 unique users in 3255 transactions
22. 8727 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 531 unique users in 4707 transactions
23. 8518 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4840 transactions
24. 8516 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 453 unique users in 5047 transactions
25. 8478 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 568 unique users in 4988 transactions
26. 8368 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 402 unique users in 4355 transactions
27. 8339 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 405 unique users in 892 transactions
28. 7725 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 456 unique users in 4272 transactions
29. 7559 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4116 transactions
30. 7282 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 575 unique users in 4326 transactions
31. 7132 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 402 unique users in 3640 transactions
32. 6881 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 228 unique users in 1768 transactions
33. 6605 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 371 unique users in 3323 transactions
34. 6600 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 384 unique users in 3599 transactions
35. 6594 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 276 unique users in 2993 transactions
36. 6569 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 935 unique users in 4247 transactions
37. 6446 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 197 unique users in 3755 transactions
38. 6413 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 478 unique users in 3568 transactions
39. 6266 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 623 unique users in 3511 transactions
40. 6229 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 413 unique users in 3623 transactions
41. 6213 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3562 transactions
42. 6153 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 220 unique users in 3604 transactions
43. 6129 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 524 unique users in 3583 transactions
44. 6089 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 327 unique users in 2870 transactions
45. 6069 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 410 unique users in 3316 transactions
46. 6032 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 452 unique users in 3382 transactions
47. 6013 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2629 transactions
48. 5845 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 203 unique users in 3383 transactions
49. 5469 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 412 unique users in 2674 transactions
50. 5427 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 442 unique users in 3830 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50914. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50915. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50916. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50917. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50918. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50919. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50920. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50921. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50922. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50923. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50924. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50925. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50926. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50927. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50928. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50929. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50930. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50931. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50932. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50933. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50934. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50935. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50936. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50937. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50938. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50939. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50940. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50941. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50942. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50943. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50944. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50945. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50946. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50947. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50948. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50949. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50950. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50951. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50952. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50953. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50954. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50955. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50956. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50957. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50958. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50959. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50960. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50961. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50962. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50963. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26549
Sample

Code:

1. 71529 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 898 unique users in 12583 transactions
2. 67052 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2171 unique users in 28959 transactions
3. 65903 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3317 unique users in 17513 transactions
4. 57925 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3557 unique users in 55737 transactions
5. 57352 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4561 unique users in 32940 transactions
6. 48782 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3647 unique users in 33795 transactions
7. 43382 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2821 unique users in 15307 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38167 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2959 unique users in 30973 transactions
10. 37376 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2509 unique users in 13870 transactions
11. 33928 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1573 unique users in 13741 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 31892 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1466 unique users in 10269 transactions
14. 29428 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2093 unique users in 10438 transactions
15. 28173 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1420 unique users in 7356 transactions
16. 27785 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1676 unique users in 6558 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22839 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1371 unique users in 9451 transactions
20. 22822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6439 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 16456 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1694 unique users in 3872 transactions
23. 16055 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1958 unique users in 6514 transactions
24. 16014 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 740 unique users in 5897 transactions
25. 15670 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1707 unique users in 7274 transactions
26. 15199 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 532 unique users in 7134 transactions
27. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
28. 15084 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1164 unique users in 8937 transactions
29. 14264 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1288 unique users in 8106 transactions
30. 14263 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1102 unique users in 1749 transactions
31. 13706 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1602 unique users in 7070 transactions
32. 13177 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3598 transactions
33. 13070 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1334 unique users in 7308 transactions
34. 13034 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2988 unique users in 6946 transactions
35. 12867 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1302 unique users in 5820 transactions
36. 12834 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1123 unique users in 7818 transactions
37. 12715 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 819 unique users in 4193 transactions
38. 12612 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 815 unique users in 6000 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11010 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1148 unique users in 6134 transactions
41. 10471 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 540 unique users in 3939 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8152 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1031 unique users in 3544 transactions
45. 8074 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3300 transactions
46. 8065 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 750 unique users in 7097 transactions
47. 7846 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 571 unique users in 6855 transactions
48. 7845 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 938 unique users in 3442 transactions
49. 7316 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 498 unique users in 5790 transactions
50. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26500. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26501. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26502. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26503. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26504. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26505. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26506. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26507. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26508. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26509. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26510. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26511. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26512. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26513. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26514. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26515. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26516. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26517. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26518. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26519. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26520. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26521. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26522. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26523. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26524. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26525. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26526. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26527. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26528. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26529. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26530. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26531. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26532. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26533. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26534. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26535. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26536. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26537. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26538. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26539. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26540. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26541. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26542. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26543. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26544. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26545. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26546. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26547. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26548. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26549. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 323896 (14.35%)
Tuesday 322649 (14.30%)
Wednesday 322930 (14.31%)
Thursday 344396 (15.26%)
Friday 341785 (15.15%)
Saturday 298368 (13.22%)
Sunday 301930 (13.38%)
Total: 2255954

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Here are your predictions for round 4 :

Name	Prediction	B/M
BABY SHOES	66 362,00
Becassine	67 093,14
cryptofrka	71 250,00
Danydee	68 210,00
Doan9269	66 379,00
ESG	65 888,55
examplens	69 446,00	0,5 malus
GazetaBitcoin	67 323,00
Hypnotizer	N/A
Leahized	67 367,00
LogitechMouse	69 696,69
LoyceV	67 852,05
Mr. Magkaisa	66 666,66	0,5 bonus
Pmalek	66 417,00
promise444c5	68 900,00
TryNinja	N/A
xLays	67 676,00

Two people did not participate (Hypnotizer and TryNinja). Sorry, but you will lose one life.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:04:14 PM

Quote from: notblox1 on Today at 12:16:23 PM

Do you know any other casinos with integrated coins swap feature?
This could be important to know for customers who want to save on withdrawal fees or withdraw different coin.

I think I have seen a crypto swap option on BetFury. I can take a look later to find out whether or not I remembered it correctly. I am pretty sure they have one. I think there is at least two more casinos where I came across swap features while doing my regular fees checks, but I can't remember which ones.

I think both of you have forgotten about this thread: (LIST) Gambling sites with internal exchange
It is reasonable, because the OP of that thread has forgotten about the thread as well Grin

. He had updated the thread 2 years ago for the last time. I had provided some updates to him a few months ago. He hasn't updated them in the table despite being active on the forum.

Anyway, Bitcoin withdrawal fee is quite low in most of the casinos now. Where it will cost more for the swap as there is a fee in every platform for this feature.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:09:13 AM

Ne znam šta mu znači ovo da samo novi korisnici mogu da učestvuju u kampanji. Pretpostavljam da misli na one koji nemaju već registrovan nalog na kasinu od prije. Zašto bi bilo bitno da li koristim novi ili postojeći nalog. Možda zato što hoće da se u recenziji piše i o bonusu dobrodošlice a oni koji su ga već aktivirali ne bi mogli pokriti taj dio. Ili hoće da se korisnici registruju preko njegovog referral linka pa da tu dobije određene procente od svake uplate.

Mislim da se odnosi samo na novoregistrovane korisnike kazina. Ima tu vise razloga verovatno i pored skupljanja novih referala za kasniji profit. Na primer kada se bude racunao uspeh kampanje, jedan od pozitivnih aspekata ce biti da je kampanja dovela novih xx igraca. Raniji igraci sigurno bolje znaju prednosti/nedostatke platforme i njihovo iskustvo bi svakako koristilo u review kampanju, ali iz nekog razloga njihov feedback nije primaran.
U biti, to su sve sekundarni efekti review kampanje, ali su istureni ispred glavnog cilja koji bi neka review kampanja trebala da ima.
Pri tom, nagrada $40-$60 (iz prethodnih iskustava znamo da ce uglavnom biti $40), minus $10 obaveznog depozita, nije bas posebno atraktivna. Za $60 (-$10) se ocekuje kvalitetna analiza, sto mislim da ce tesko ici.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:38:42 AM

Thanks for the tip. I will take a look at the numbers when I add them to the table.

Thank you.
Jackpotter is good so far and I think they are going to be even better.
Do you know any other casinos with integrated coins swap feature?
This could be important to know for customers who want to save on withdrawal fees or withdraw different coin.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 19, 2026, 04:31:53 PM

Punkz casino added four new slot games to its constantly increasing catalogue a few days ago.

Those are:
- Supersized by Nolimit City. A high volatility slot with a 12,345x maximum payout.
- Zeus Ze Zecond by Hacksaw. A medium volatility slot with a 20,000x maximum payout.
- Knights vs Barbarians by Pragmatic Play. A high volatility slot with a 10,000x maximum payout.
- Flaming Chicken: Highway Hazard by Penguin King. A high volatility slot with a 20,000x maximum payout.

https://x.com/CasinoPunkz/status/2023140043649409354

Some high volatility game's, nice one Punkz and like the game providers releasing the new games Cool

Btw, not sure how true it is, but I hear it's easy to win at slots when the game has just been listed (new).. and this would be the perfect time for everyone to put this theory to the test...For science Grin

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 04:42:23 AM

So, not only is it convenient for ~~clueless would-be victims~~ Twitter users to access all kinds of information from a single platform, or arrive at any exchange's sign-up page, they also get to enjoy exclusive ~~bait~~ deals.

can't wait for all the things that will go wrong with this and to see people complaining about losing their money after they joined a pump and dump, etc... or however investing/trading grifters on twitter gonna abuse it. it's going to be a real shitshow.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:59:13 AM

Grok thinks that eToro could become X's partner for the Smart Cashtag transactions, but that's only speculation at this point.

i'm sure twitter users are going to love that considering where eToro is based.

Pmalek can you add Jackpotter casino on your table for Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts?
Minimum Withdrawal amount is 0.00015 BTC that is around $10 currently.
Transaction Fee is 0.00005 BTC or $3.34
Other coins have different withdrawal fees or amounts, and there is internal Jackpotter coin swap service

Quote from: Pmalek on February 18, 2026, 07:47:25 AM

Quote from: satscraper on February 17, 2026, 06:07:08 PM

Besides, the letter was postmarked in Pennsylvania, while the headquarters of SatoshiLabs ^{relevant to Trezor} is located in Prague, Czech Republic.

Scammers have really gotten stupid lately.

Correct again. That's where they sent it from. They did write the Czech address at the top right of the letter, though.

They are not stupid, they are targeting stupid (naive) people. I also think that this is some kind of organized network that sends such letters all over the world, but obviously not from France or the Czech Republic because then those companies could file a complaint with the police. As far as I can see, almost identical documents are posted on the official Ledger website, and I read somewhere that they come from various EU countries.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:47:20 AM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on February 17, 2026, 06:56:06 PM

Do you really think that toshi.bet representative should be posting regularly updates on this thread, for instance there are some updates and free rolls they do announce on Twitter which could like be shared as well?
For instance, I am not a regular user of x and I can't even remember my details on x, but that could be shared here for people over here to get involved. Off course I know that they could be doing that I think there are people who are missing a lot about toshi.bet.

I see no reason why a casino's forum representative wouldn't be active on Bitcointalk, posting regular updates and information about the casino as they become available. If they can do it on X and other social media, they can do the same on this forum. It takes a little bit of effort, but it can help in attracting new players who might be searching for something new and different to try out.

Of course it wouldn’t cost their representative anything here, and of course their profile here has received enough activity to be able to display graphics. To me I see it as additional methods of promoting over here.
I could remembered then, there was a casino I regularly used to gamble and it was their regular update that attracted me where I was looking for particular game to play on and immediately they posted it I become the sure of the site.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 16, 2026, 04:56:28 PM

Quote from: AakZaki on February 13, 2026, 08:52:56 PM

This is what exchange you offer, this is like a robber disguised as an exchange. Your rate is ridiculous...

Do you know what is interesting? You posted that image three days ago, where it shows that their rate is 1 BTC for 59,000 USDT. I just checked the site, and it's still the same exchange rate. 1 BTC at 59,000 USDT. The rate has probably stayed like that for God knows how long, and they are just hoping that an uninformed user will get hooked. Let's hope they never do.

Thank you for pointing this out.

The rate shown in that image was the result of a temporary technical error, which has now been fully corrected. Our exchange rates are updated automatically, and the system is designed to adjust in line with market movements.

We want to assure you that we do not and will never rely on misleading rates to attract users. Transparency, fairness, and honest operations are core principles of our business.

We are always committed to working professionally and maintaining the trust of our clients and partners.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:35:19 PM

As you can see from OP's response a few posts below yours, the exchange had some issues with its frontend servers which affected button presses. Maybe that's why nothing happened when you clicked on the "Get Quote" button. Try it now. It should work. I have just checked the clearnet site and it looks fine. No double clicks on buttons were needed.

Yeah, mate i have seen OP's response. And I have tried testing the exchange service already.
When I was testing the service "get quote" button was not working properly, but after the passage of sometime it started working properly.
Because of this, I was able to complete my task. You can see in the above response that I have tested the service, which means that the "get quote" button is now fully functional and working properly.

Quote from: Zwei on February 11, 2026, 07:55:06 PM

Quote from: NotATether on February 10, 2026, 07:33:45 PM

I'm surprised nobody hasn't suggested to report the domain yet. Report the domain for abuse to the registrar. They must take again against it.

everyone reading this should report the domain accually. because what's crazy is that, based on the wayback machine, this scam site has been running since at least august 2024.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 11, 2026, 08:19:37 AM

It seems it wasn't a small amount either.

yeah, sadly it looks like that's the case. they are asking him for 12% of his "invested" funds, so he must have lost ~$35k.

Quote from: bolektusk on February 08, 2026, 12:55:26 PM

1] IRS TAX FEE: 12% of your investment is $4200

Where should it be reported?

Anyone know where the company is registered?

On their about page https://grandaccessinvestment.com/about

They show their 'Certificate of Incorporation with Companies House, London'

but this shows a false number and is fraudulent.

This is a criminal outfit and should be shut down, but I can't work out where it operates from.

Quote from: mitchr4 on Today at 08:39:25 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:15 AM

Quote from: Synchronice on February 13, 2026, 02:26:43 PM

Bgaming Chips Aviator is one of the worst game that I've ever played. Doesn't matter how much you deposit, you lose everything. Played it many times in a row with 0.10 bets and you just lose your money too quickly. Almost every bet is a failed bet or in the best case, you win 80% of bet and that happens 2 out of 10 times.
What's the RTP of this game? Seems to be extremely volatile.

Maybe try with another strategy. It's a game based on luck but still you can try a different approach. I am not a big fan of crash games myself. Are you betting on too high multipliers? That's another thing you can change. Instead of betting on 2x or more, try, 1.5x, 1.2x, or even lower.

There is this opinion, which of course isn't true but still, that if several high/low multipliers come up in a row, then it's time for the opposite to happen. You can keep an eye on that as well.

if I'm not mistaken, Chips Aviators is actually not a regular crash game. It's BGaming's Aviamasters with slightly different mechanics. The plane flies along a randomized path and can collect multipliers along the way, but it can also hit rockets that cut your balance in half. If the plane successfully lands on the ship you win, if it falls into the water you lose everything.

So, this is not like the regular crash games we usually play. In a normal crash game, we can decide when to cash out whenever we want. In this game, everything depends on the multipliers and random obstacles along the flight path, so we don't have full control

Based on what you both explained, Chips Aviators is not like any ordinary crash games. There is no option to only cash out every time as in the traditional versions, but you purely rely on the random route that the plane will follow and the multipliers it will pass. Rockets have the ability to halve your balance and falling into the water will result in loss of all and hence incredibly volatile. Even the modest bets such as 0.10 are lost easily. It may lower multipliers or decreased stakes, an inch but still it is luck that reigns supreme. The only thing to do is to consider that it is entertainment, save your money, and do not chase after losses.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:15 AM

Quote from: Synchronice on February 13, 2026, 02:26:43 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:23:36 PM

Quote from: GODENKOR on Today at 09:13:21 AM

Why are you writing all this? Let's all lie so people will buy their products. You'll die from what you eat. The packaging will say "gluten-free," but the product actually contains gluten. Why make concessions to the casinos? I exposed them, and you should be grateful that I showed everyone how casinos deceive with their signs.

If you want to see what your food contains, read the ingredients. If you want to see the rules of a casino, read the terms and conditions. In the T&Cs it says that the casino can request verification any time they believe it's necessary. That's the rule you comply with by opening an account at almost every crypto casino.

In all casino ANN threads on this forum you can find people who have been gambling there but have not been asked to perform KYC. However, you will also find those where that's not the case. That's why I said that it's no KYC by default but it can change anytime.

You don't seem to understand the expression "no kyc"; it means "no verification," meaning there shouldn't be any, if there are any pitfalls, then your sign needs to be removed. It's that simple, right?

Thank you for updating this table again op. I generally avoid sites that team up with Betby who are proven scammers which is why this table makes it extremely easy to avoid sites that team up with them. Keep up the good work op.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 16, 2026, 04:35:03 PM

Betby is dominating the game and has a majority share it seems.

There lies the problem. They are proven scammers who add another risky layer to the already risky nature of sports betting. They probably offer budget deals to get sites to partner with them.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:43:12 PM

We have seen in the past cases of Ledger users receiving physical mail with various types of scams and phishing attempts. There were even cases of hardware wallets being sent to someone's house.

The same is happening with Trezor.
Scammers are sending out letters to people, asking them to complete a mandatory "authentication check." If not, they claim the users won't be able to access Trezor Suite and would have limited functionality. The letters contain a QR code that they want you to scan to activate the authentication check. These lead to phishing sites where they want you to enter your seed so they can steal your coins.

Dumb scammers in this case.

If anyone actually looked at who signed this “Trezor” letter, they’d immediately notice that the letter stated it bears the signature of Ledger’s SEO, but then, it is better than Satoshi. Grin

Besides, the letter was postmarked in Pennsylvania, while the headquarters of SatoshiLabs ^{relevant to Trezor} is located in Prague, Czech Republic.

Scammers have really gotten stupid lately.

Quote from: Fivestar4everMVP on February 16, 2026, 04:03:11 PM

~ I don't know if you understand what I mean..

I doubt that I understood what you said here.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 16, 2026, 04:35:03 PM

~snip~

It is very easy to know which sportsbook is operating with the odds provider Betby. All of them have the same UI. For the sportsbook with other odds providers, I did some research to find out the provider name. I also tried to get the information about them from the odds provider website. Occasionally, I have compared the odds of a sportsbook with other sportsbooks to get an idea about their odds provider.

Initially, it was very difficult for me to make the list by finding out those information. None of the sportsbooks have any logo or information about their odds provider on their website.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 09:06:37 AM

Quote from: GODENKOR on February 16, 2026, 07:55:01 PM

Why is your title "no KYC" a lie? Why doesn't the administration remove these pathetic, aggressive marketing campaigns? It's terrible. Bitcointalk is simply a gathering place for scammers to collect people's data.

https://snipboard.io/hqIVY1.jpg

Nowadays when you see casinos advertised as not requiring KYC assume that it means they won't ask KYC by default. In other words, you can create an account, deposit and start betting without verifying your identity. That's a difference to fiat casinos. It doesn't mean that you wont ever be asked for KYC under any circumstances. You experienced it yourself. I don't know what you did, but whatever it was, it triggered some people somewhere to want to take a closer look at you.

Round 3 is now over, here are the results :

Closing price on 16/02/2026 : 68 908$

Name	Prediction	Val	Difference
LoyceV	68 636,58	Mr. Magkaisa	271
Pmalek	68 517,00	Hypnotizer	391
Hypnotizer	69 412,00	Leahized	504
GazetaBitcoin	69 423,00	Becassine	515
Mr. Magkaisa	69 696,00	LogitechMouse	788
promise444c5	68 100,00	Doan9269	808
Becassine	69 934,00	Danydee	1 026
BABY SHOES	67 832,00	Danydee	1 076
examplens	69 989,00	LoyceV	1 081
TryNinja	70 001,00	ESG	1 093
Leahized	67 657,00	GazetaBitcoin	1 251
LogitechMouse	67 569,96	Mr. Magkaisa	1 338
Doan9269	65 900,00	promise444c5	3 008
ESG	65 555,00	TryNinja	3 353
Danydee	72 714,00	Becassine	3 806
cryptofrka	65 000,00	Pmalek	3 908
xLays	64 557,00	examplens	4 351

Congratulations LoyceV, love didn’t distract you (is a bot capable of feeling love ?) and you managed to predict the right BTC price. Your account has been credited with 50BTC.
Mr. Magkaisa, by choosing you, LoyceV gave you a nice little gift, since for the next round you will get a 0.5% bonus.

Sorry xLays, you need to stay focused on the BTC price. You lose a life.
Examplens, I’m sorry to tell you this, but your romance with xLays smells like a toxic relationship. For the next round, you will get a 0.5% malus.

Alright, we’re finally done with this love bullshit. I need to vent some rage right now !
Back in the day, whenever I needed to cool off, I used to play Quake. What a pleasure it was to frag people with the railgun under Quad Damage... Oh wait, what if I activate Quad Damage for round 4 ??
Just one piece of advice : don’t finish in the bottom four.
After that, I wil have an exclusive offer for the winner.

DAH... DAH... DAH !

Round 4 : Quad Damage activated !

What will be the price of Bitcoin at February 23, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 22/02/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before February 20, 2026, 07:00:00 PM.

Cash shop: OPEN

Special rules : None.

Free bets have been credited to your Rainbet accounts

Quote from: Rainbet on Today at 02:22:50 AM

Congrats to the winners

Pmalek
jeremypwr
CLS63
darxiaomi

* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love Free Bets

Code:

Zwei
notblox1
Koal-84
Harkorede
Trofo
LFC_Bitcoin
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
buwaytress
jeremypwr
CLS63
Slissy
hosemary
NeuroticFish
cryptofrka
Dump3er
KTChampions
Pmalek
mv1986
darxiaomi
famososMuertos
Mahdirakib
tiCeR
vivekdhyani1
goodpunt
hilariousandco
xandry
slaman29
SatoPrincess
leea-1334
mitchr4
VashaUdacha777
mole0815
ILuckyGuyI
Ryu_Ar1
Betwrong
Strongkored
xLays
jayce

* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love Free Bets

Code:

* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love Free Bets

Code:

Quote from: katanic97 on February 13, 2026, 08:28:02 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on February 13, 2026, 04:39:54 PM

Quote from: Daniel91 on February 13, 2026, 08:58:54 AM

Da, sjećam se te CM kampanje jako dobro.
Kada god je manager imao otvorenu novu poziciju, prijave bi redovno bile na 10-15 stranica i sve bi izgledalo kao neki natječaj za pravi posao a onaj koga bi manager odabrao, njega bi cijeli forum provjeravao do stoljeća sedmog Grin

To je jedina kampanja za koju mi je stvarno žao da nisam uspio upasti jer se stvarno moglo dobro zaraditi, čak i za hrvatske prilike.

Menadžer ChipMixer kampanje, DarkStar je otišao sa foruma nakon što je CM pao i mislim da se nije više nikad vratio. Osim što je vodio ChipMixer kampanju, dugo je i posuđivao članovima zajednice bitcoin na kredit a djelovao je i kao escrow.

I ja sam se prijavljivao za kampanju svaki put kad bi bilo slobodno mjesto u tom periodu kad su najviše plaćali ali nisam nikad uspio upasti. I onda jedan dan dolazi PM DarkStar-a i pitanje želiš li se pridružiti kampanji. Naravno da želim. Kao i Rikafip, i ja sam uletio nakon što je smanjen budžet kampanje i to odmah nekoliko tjedana poslje.

Ja sad citam ovo sto pisete i stvarno sam iznenadjen,jer ispada da su se ljudi "tukli" za mesto u kampanji. Nisam bio u tom periodu na forumu i krivo mi je iskreno ... Kao sto Daniel kaze da su ostali clanovi proveravali ostale koji su upali u kampanju i trazili im propuste ili sta god,stvarno neverovatno. Hteo sam da pitam na osnovu cega su bile toliko velile nedeljne isplate? I sta mislite da li ce ikad biti vece isplate u kampanjama od $100? Cheesy

Da, u ranim danima ovog foruma, mogli su se, bez ikakvog problema zaraditi cijeli bitcoini, no to vrijeme je prošlo i neće se nikada vratiti Grin

Kao što je netko spomenuo, samo klikanjem fauceta na određenim stranicama mogao si zaraditi velike iznose btc no tada je malo ljudi bilom aktivno na ovom forumu a još manje ljudi je sve ovo shvaćalo ozbiljno i zaista vjerovalo da će btc, koji je u ranim danima, vrijedio par dolara, jednog dana vrijediti više od 100k.
Vjerujem da se mnogi ljudi, koji su te btc prodali za ''sitno'' za 10 ili 20$ (ili s njima kupovali pizze lol Grin

) i vjerovali da su odlično zaradili, 10 ili 20 X sada tuče po glavi s obzirom da su mogli zaraditi i 1 000 puta više Grin

Za nas, koji smo zakasnili na te ''rane dane'' btc i priključili se forumu malo kasnije, CM je bio ''vrh vrhova'' ali upasti u tu kampanju bilo je zaista jako teška misija a proces prijave je nalikovao na audiciju, gdje te provjeravao čitav forum i svi su jedva čekali svaki krivi korak primljenih članova, da bi ih zamijenili u kampanji.
Glavni razkog je naravno bio što je zaista ozbiljna lova bila u pitanju, čak i za nas iz Evrope, a da ne govorimo za nekog iz Afrike ili Azije.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:48:31 AM

Quote from: Unsoldier on February 15, 2026, 07:32:35 PM

In this match, I’d lean more towards a low-scoring game rather than expecting a lot of goals. In recent meetings between Napoli and Roma, the scoreline has usually been minimal — one goal, maybe two at most.
...

And how wrong we both were. The derby ended 2:2, and Napoli scored more than 1.5 goals despite the bookies not trusting them that they will. That goes to show how everything is possible, regardless how likely or unlikely it seems to be.

I wonder if salad daging ended up placing that bet. @salad daging, did you follow your instinct and bet on Napoli to score more than 1.5 goals against Roma last night? The wager would have been a winning won.

That’s football for you — I completely agree, we both got it wrong. All the stats pointed towards a tight, low-scoring game, but instead we got a 2–2 draw and a completely different scenario from what we expected.
For Napoli, this draw feels bittersweet. On one hand, they avoided defeat and held on to third place. On the other, the gap to Inter is now 11 points, and honestly, it’s becoming harder and harder to talk about a title challenge for Conte’s side. The gap just looks too big at this stage.