Last update: 2026-11-07_Sat_19.54h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Pmalek receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Pmalek
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Pmalek" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67321821 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Sat Nov 7 19:50:31 CET 2026) in JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack:
I would agree that a long term signature could be helpful for Jack.com to get more visibility in the forum, especially for those who haven't heard of Jack.com yet. For me, how long they run a campaign is not sufficient to make a casino well known or successful. This is because marketing can only attract visitors to a platform, but once they're there, it's the experience they will have that will keep them.
I think that some casinos have the wrong expectations from Bitcointalk signature campaigns. They expect an instant influx of new players and more revenue in one or two weeks of running a marketing campaign here. That's not going to work. You want the banner to be visible in front of the right audience for a long time. The next time those players start thinking about a new casino to join, you want them to remember that they have been seeing your casino signature everywhere, and register. Expecting too much too soon doesn't do anyone any good.
Running a signature campaign for only a few weeks is just plain pointless, the effects just don't last long. People tends to forget things very easily! As soon as people stops talking about the brand or stops seeing it's banners, they starts to disappear from our mind. Also expecting large numbers of registrations in a short amount of time is foolish thinking. Yeah it's possible if they brands starts giving out lucrative bonuses or deals, but that also not gonna last long. The only way is to build recognition slowly over time..
So yeah, I second your opinion on this matter!
2. Post 67321386 (unedited backup) (by nullius) (scraped on Sat Nov 7 17:24:55 CET 2026) in Mixers to be banned:
"Taint" only exists if people want it to exist, and the companies who's business model is to sell "the notion of taint" are good at convincing more and more people they need to pay them for their "services".
Eh? You encourage AML checks. (No offense to NotATether; I understand why they offer this. My point is that taint is real—and it’s grown to be something it wasn’t four years ago.)
[ANN] BitMixList.org - XMR <=> BTC - AML Score Checker - Bitcoin Mixer ListMerited by klarki (100), bitmover (15), ABCbits (13), LoyceV (12), n0nce (10), NeuroticFish (5), Pmalek (5), OmegaStarScream (4), TryNinja (3), dkbit98 (3), nc50lc (2), Husna QA (2), suchmoon (1), hugeblack (1), DireWolfM14 (1), RGBTC (1), Bitcoin_Arena (1), AakZaki (1), m2017 (1), God Of Thunder (1), Helena Yu (1), Trêvoid (1)
Bitcoin Historical ContextPlease take the long view. This fight started not later than 2011—perhaps earlier; a more knowledgeable Bitcoin historian would need to elucidate.
I didn't know someone speculate such possibility long time ago, although it's disappointing he consider it as something that shouldn't be feared.
I think one of the problems is, most Bitcoiners lack adequate historical context to see the implications of this thread.
You are
far more knowledeable than most forum users, so please don’t take insult as I illustrate this example:
The upper bound (latest possible time) for when you (u=359716) first discovered Bitcoin is 2014.
(Not asking. None of my business.) Thus, if I tell you that
Gavin (u=224) “verified” Faketoshi in 2016, or if I talk to you about the personalities involved in the 2017 Jihancoin hardfork, I don’t need to explain. You may know many parts of this better than I do! If you talk to a newbie who discovered Bitcoin in 2020, you may guide them to read old forum threads about Faketoshi, and about the fork wars, etc.
If I discuss my suspicion that Gavin (u=224) may have been compromised by the CIA, you
may know why; even though
the most relevant thread was in 2011, it’s one of the most (in)famous old threads on the forum.
Yet if
even you don’t know that this...
It reminds me of statement from one of former US official few years ago.
Carole House, a former White House director for cybersecurity and secure digital innovation, who is now executive in residence at Terranet Ventures, spoke at the DeCenter Spring Conference at Princeton University in April, proposing exactly that.
In her speech, House suggested that it would be great if miners, as well as validators of proof-of-stake blockchains, came together and agreed not to mine OFAC-blacklisted transactions, as well as not to build upon blocks with such transactions. She also noted that having as much hashpower as possible in the U.S., where miners have to comply with the sanctions, would help make that vision a reality.
It's essentially 51% attack under disguise of "OFAC compliant".
...is indeed only the later iteration of a plan first discussed in
2011, (and maybe even earlier that I don’t know about?)...
By the way, I observe that Hearn posted this topic ten days before Gavin announced that he was visiting the CIA; see also the alleged Satoshi email quoted below:From time to time governments freeze the assets of people or organizations they believe to be criminal. [...] BitCoins apparent inability to do this will certainly make law enforcement uncomfortable with the concept.
But in reality, by the time BitCoin is large enough for this to be a real issue it will be quite possible to freeze bitcoins by requiring miners to exclude transactions from blacklisted addresses.
I infer that you read it, ABCbits; I quote it for others....then, I guess that
most of the discussion of this 81-page thread probably lacks for historical context.
Why am I freaking out about the mixer advertising ban? I don’t need mixers, and I was never in their
paid signature campaigns. I see this in the big picture, in the historical context of the past 15 years. Step by step, Bitcoin is being transformed from a system of freedom into a weapon for crushing oppression.
I intend soon to make a new thread showing some old threads that I know, and inviting others to do similarly.
Check Post HistoryOnce again, none of what I say here is new for me.
If different same-sized pieces of a currency have different values, then it is not a currency at all: It is a chaotic mess of non-fungible tokens. (This is what Mike Hearn wanted; and where is he now?)
From: Satoshi Nakamoto <
satoshin@gmx.com>
Date: Sat,
Apr 23, 2011 at 3:40 PM
To: Mike Hearn <
mike@plan99.net>
[...]
I've moved on to other things. It's
[Bitcoin is] in good hands with Gavin and everyone.
So, this unauthenticated e-mail was allegedly sent by Satoshi to
Mike Mr Surveillance & Taint Hearn four days before Gavin Andresen publicly announced his visit to the CIA:
Subject: Gavin will visit the CIAI want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community.
Coin taint and blacklisting are what break Bitcoin’s fungibility. BTC is an NFT: A non-fungible token, due to coin taint and blacklisting. The subset of Bitcoiners who refuse to acknowledge this are either living in a Reality Distortion Field, or still under the influence of the blockchain transparency fetishization with which Mike Hearn, et al. poisoned Bitcoin early on. I identify a lack of fungibility as the biggest long-term economic threat to Bitcoin.
Is the problem AI? No.
Disagreed, but that’s off-topic.
Is Bitcoin to blame? No.
Was it the fault of whoever created Bitcoin? No.
People just like to take advantage of what they have that's good.
That view is both totally passive, and outright nihilistic.
The best proof that Bitcoin is private is that to this day no one has been able to discover who its creator is. You could say that he didn't touch his Bitcoin. He didn't touch that Bitcoin that was known to be his. And the other one? We don't know.
That assumes a whole string of facts not in evidence. Even assuming all those facts
arguendo, all it would show is that it’s hard to dox the coins of someone who mined anonymously on a desktop PC in 2009. For those of us who didn’t, it’s irrelevant. It’s also irrelevant to further usage of those coins; as soon as a 2009-era anonymous miner moves the coins, they go into circulation like any others, and are thereafter subject to all of the same privacy and fungibility problems.
As I understand it, you’re trying to blow against the wind.
You could have said the same thing to Satoshi in 2008. Some people aren’t so passive.
What should I say about that...probably nothing, except that every man is the smith of his own rough luck.
This is the type of response that gets Bitcoin accused of a cultlike mentality. If I’d written about problems with the banking system (where I
could’ve made a ton of money when I was younger), then you’d give me three cheers. Instead, I wrote about real problems with Bitcoin—and I showed some historical context of how Bitcoin developers
tried to fix those problems in 2013. You reply that it’s basically just my fault that I didn’t corrupt my principles with FOMO for HODL moons. 🚀
I reject a system that doesn’t give me freedom. Isn’t Bitcoin supposed to be about freedom? I didn’t come to Bitcoin for financial speculation, and I’m
more than beginning to agree with those who say the speculation aspect is a bad thing. It corrupts.
As LoyceV said, “the taint” here is nothing more than perception, and it seems you took this stuff seriously, just as the government wanted.
So, it’s all in my head? If I get funds frozen under shotgun KYC because of taint, will you guarantee my transaction, and make me whole with money from your own wallet? Or will you tell me it’s “nothing more than perception” that my funds were frozen?
This is
gaslighting—with a twist: You’re in denial of the real impact of taint. See also my above self-quote about a “Reality Distortion Field”.
I didn’t.
Yes, you do. Your signature, avatar, and personal text currently advertise “AntiSwap.io - NO AML/KYC EXCHANGER MONITORING”, which would not need to exist without taint and “AML” problems.
Whereas
I’m the only one in this thread who absolutely rejects the concept of taint. I shall never, ever use an “AML checker”. I swear on my PGP key.
You may also want to inform some other benighted rubes that taint is all in their heads, such as NotATether, or...
I put my Address in to the b1exch Anti Money Laundering checking tool for the first time this year, and considering my threat level I should be tied up and locked in a dark, damp cell right now!
No offense to said “benighted rubes”, whom I personally respect. We’ve all gotta deal with the real world somehow. My own choice to deal with it is henceforth to treat a Bitcoin UTXO as a hot potato. I will hold ZEC and some XMR, use exchanges with strict no-KYC policies, and never, ever use an “AML checker”.
Anyway, satscraper,
your account was registered in 2022; perhaps you may want to learn the history of taint, before you try to teach others about it.
One of most commonly raised issues with Bitcoin is that of crime and punishment. Over the past 40 years our societies have, through both fair means and foul, built an integrated anti-money laundering system that attempts to let governments trace the proceeds of crime.
[...] Blacklist providers maintain sets of outputs that are blacklisted or tainted in some way, for instance because the owner reported them stolen or because it’s believed they are owned by some criminal enterprise. [...]
3. Post 67321092 (unedited backup) (by memehunter) (scraped on Sat Nov 7 15:55:25 CET 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:
Slots are the games that can give you 100,000x your stake
Only a handful of slots from top 10 slot providers like pragmatic, hacksaw, bggaming etc. will give you that high of a multiplier (100000x). Most of the slots are capped at 10000x. You also have to realize that when you spin slots usually your stakes are per spin are quite low, like 100th of your balance which make this max win even smaller. The only positive thing about slot is the entertainment aspect you just get totally consumed by the feel.
4. Post 67320107 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Nov 7 08:25:01 CET 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-10-30_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1793328645 1 178336.msg67291800 120694 67210
1793328498 1 178336.msg67291816 120694 157572
1793328485 1 178336.msg67291800 18321 67210
1793328455 1 178336.msg67291816 252510 157572
1793328448 1 178336.msg67291546 18321 67210
1793328410 1 178336.msg67291763 198573 252510
1793328405 1 178336.msg67291805 252510 67210
1793328343 1 178336.msg67291816 198573 157572
1793328329 1 178336.msg67290945 18321 169384
1793328327 2 178336.msg67291814 198573 120694
1793328260 1 178336.msg67291800 198573 67210
1793328166 1 178336.msg67291761 252510 198573
1793328054 47 178336.msg67290945 157572 169384
1793327752 1 178336.msg67291691 120694 67210
1793327704 1 178336.msg67291546 120694 67210
1793327639 1 178336.msg67291170 120694 2393114
1793327445 1 178336.msg67291170 252510 2393114
1793327314 1 178336.msg67291067 252510 1852120
1793327300 1 5598317.msg67291788 156391 3735576
1793327251 1 178336.msg67290945 252510 169384
1793326954 1 178336.msg67290709 252510 223922
1793326713 1 178336.msg67290462 252510 3757269
1793326648 1 178336.msg67290278 252510 2755547
1793326555 1 5569989.msg67291734 976210 2033515
1793325669 1 178336.msg67291761 67210 198573
1793325164 1 5598307.msg67291640 961598 839568
1793325151 1 5598307.msg67291548 961598 831523
1793324727 1 5598307.msg67291350 961598 976441
1793324278 1 178336.msg67289743 252510 33156
1793323688 10 178336.msg67291691 1067333 67210
1793323677 1 178336.msg67289060 252510 124876
1793323592 9 178336.msg67291468 1067333 379487
1793323515 21 178336.msg67290945 1067333 169384
1793323421 3 5581742.msg67290823 64507 18321
1793323378 2 5598315.msg67291623 3441086 2443746
1793323002 3 5598319.msg67291709 64507 2033515
1793322770 1 5376945.msg67291242 252510 3525056
1793321677 4 5569989.msg67279530 2033515 2003859
1793320469 1 5361248.msg67289722 831523 3552965
1793320451 1 5361248.msg67288095 831523 3706783
1793320424 1 5361248.msg67280645 831523 1827294
1793320274 1 178336.msg67291691 198573 67210
1793320263 1 5598307.msg67291350 2747752 976441
1793320204 1 5376945.msg67289873 252510 3606054
1793319675 1 5598288.msg67291678 355846 3704403
1793319646 1 5569989.msg67279530 976210 2003859
1793319231 2 5573547.msg67288826 932931 3547969
1793318498 1 5586817.msg66876590 1031572 941526
1793318496 1 5376945.msg67289133 252510 3646039
1793318451 1 5376945.msg67289078 252510 3625720
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (59 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2497 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
NEW merit.all.txt (59 MB) is available in user-sized chunks at
loyce.club/Merit/merit.all/459836.txt (change userID for each user) for userscript processing.
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 30 Oct 2026 03:50:45 AM CET,
xhomerx10 (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Richy_T (
history) for
Re: Automated posting.
On Fri 30 Oct 2026 03:48:18 AM CET,
xhomerx10 (
history) sent 1 Merit to
heslo (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 30 Oct 2026 03:48:05 AM CET,
OgNasty (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Richy_T (
history) for
Re: Automated posting.
On Fri 30 Oct 2026 03:47:35 AM CET,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
heslo (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 30 Oct 2026 03:47:28 AM CET,
OgNasty (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Richy_T (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (622 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8954 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 935 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 19 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3771641:
woopmedia (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3771781:
u.software (
history) earned: 3 Merit.
3772229:
overdog_bet (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3772339:
Netzfluss (
history) earned: 4 Merit.
3772436:
noxswap (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
Full list* (11 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3769360: CryptoVertex7
3769597: GGGary33
3769613: swap.thorchain.org
3769704: Munshi Prem Chand
3769762: noMEMEwork
3769768: Chad221
3769779: roulettedojo
3769859: mrpcrypto26
3769889: nwillems
3769913: theresinada5b4
3769956: accsnake
3769973: PedroMoisesss
3769995: WW Downloader
3769999: Reroll.gg
3770060: Secksthemex
3770125: ElDorado_21
3770135: Obsidian Games
3770278: Rezo37
3770295: Black_Onyx
3770308: p2pie
3770323: khpalcoin
3770340: MissyMiningCat
3770372: jetLA
3770414: adbench
3770521: Falco Volpe
3770595: varnda
3770612: bitrox
3770667: SleepycatSwap
3770700: Queen Amara Belle
3770776: SirTom7891
3770783: BiggerZ.com
3770794: ClubChess.Net
3771105: blackisbeauty
3771123: ccc.io
3771157: Geofingerprintgeo
3771268: kemoth00
3771322: twentynine.io
3771337: giantlife
3771348: AnonChangeCom
3771354: rapingabuser
3771379: Anonym Browser
3771430: vpuravida
3771456: DICE777
3771511: Alt112
3771572: casbuy1909
3771641: woopmedia
3771781: u.software
3772229: overdog_bet
3772339: Netzfluss
3772436: noxswap
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8954
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:19
12:0:2
13:3:99
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:10
26:0:19
27:0:60
28:0:16
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14655:15465
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2792
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1498
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3769360:0:1
3769597:0:1
3769613:3:7
3769704:3:18
3769762:0:3
3769768:0:4
3769779:0:4
3769859:0:2
3769889:0:1
3769913:0:1
3769956:0:1
3769973:0:1
3769995:0:1
3769999:0:23
3770060:0:1
3770125:0:8
3770135:0:1
3770278:0:2
3770295:0:3
3770308:0:4
3770323:0:1
3770340:0:11
3770372:0:5
3770414:0:8
3770521:0:2
3770595:0:1
3770612:0:1
3770667:2:23
3770700:0:1
3770776:0:1
3770783:0:22
3770794:0:1
3771105:0:4
3771123:0:20
3771157:0:1
3771268:0:2
3771322:0:3
3771337:0:1
3771348:15:36
3771354:0:1
3771379:0:1
3771430:0:1
3771456:0:1
3771511:0:5
3771572:0:1
3771641:0:2
3771781:0:3
3772229:0:1
3772339:0:4
3772436:0:2
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51991Sample 1. 22036 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1138 unique users in 12805 transactions
2. 21817 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 783 unique users in 11884 transactions
3. 18984 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 10006 transactions
4. 15797 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 482 unique users in 9048 transactions
5. 15465 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1245 unique users in 5666 transactions
6. 14198 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 750 unique users in 9313 transactions
7. 13694 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 624 unique users in 5112 transactions
8. 12560 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 554 unique users in 6436 transactions
9. 12436 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 513 unique users in 6792 transactions
10. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
11. 11715 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 627 unique users in 6850 transactions
12. 11625 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 596 unique users in 6694 transactions
13. 11408 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6484 transactions
14. 11135 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 690 unique users in 6000 transactions
15. 10922 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 332 unique users in 5563 transactions
16. 10867 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 573 unique users in 4793 transactions
17. 10663 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 348 unique users in 3903 transactions
18. 10548 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 562 unique users in 4849 transactions
19. 10392 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 409 unique users in 3627 transactions
20. 10391 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 471 unique users in 5604 transactions
21. 10234 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 482 unique users in 5135 transactions
22. 9462 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 546 unique users in 5147 transactions
23. 9326 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 598 unique users in 5513 transactions
24. 9308 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 422 unique users in 4818 transactions
25. 8954 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 415 unique users in 946 transactions
26. 8952 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 462 unique users in 5321 transactions
27. 8626 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 576 unique users in 4893 transactions
28. 8618 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 469 unique users in 4715 transactions
29. 7917 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 615 unique users in 4731 transactions
30. 7664 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 204 unique users in 4377 transactions
31. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
32. 7371 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1893 transactions
33. 7318 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 231 unique users in 4159 transactions
34. 7239 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 407 unique users in 3692 transactions
35. 7198 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 422 unique users in 3984 transactions
36. 7143 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 364 unique users in 3412 transactions
37. 7134 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 390 unique users in 3656 transactions
38. 7004 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 501 unique users in 3931 transactions
39. 6965 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 540 unique users in 4002 transactions
40. 6949 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 967 unique users in 4499 transactions
41. 6898 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 210 unique users in 3991 transactions
42. 6862 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 282 unique users in 3076 transactions
43. 6785 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 444 unique users in 3712 transactions
44. 6605 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 444 unique users in 3861 transactions
45. 6410 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 632 unique users in 3613 transactions
46. 6297 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3511 transactions
47. 6291 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 223 unique users in 3660 transactions
48. 6089 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2651 transactions
49. 6018 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 405 unique users in 2878 transactions
50. 5987 Merit received by vapourminer (#33156) from 285 unique users in 3848 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51942. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51943. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51944. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51945. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51946. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51947. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51948. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51949. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51950. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51951. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51952. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51953. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51954. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51955. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51956. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51957. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51958. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51959. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51960. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51961. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51962. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51963. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51964. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51965. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51966. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51967. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51968. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51969. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51970. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51971. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51972. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51973. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51974. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51975. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51976. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51977. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51978. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51979. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51980. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51981. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51982. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51983. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51984. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51985. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51986. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51987. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51988. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51989. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51990. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51991. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26830Sample 1. 79989 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 917 unique users in 13318 transactions
2. 74557 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2348 unique users in 33097 transactions
3. 70929 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3374 unique users in 18444 transactions
4. 64283 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3715 unique users in 62007 transactions
5. 61856 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4824 unique users in 35399 transactions
6. 57068 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3843 unique users in 39578 transactions
7. 46659 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2981 unique users in 16535 transactions
8. 41832 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2888 unique users in 9167 transactions
9. 40860 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2577 unique users in 14913 transactions
10. 38411 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2966 unique users in 31089 transactions
11. 37197 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1611 unique users in 14495 transactions
12. 35628 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2285 unique users in 12020 transactions
13. 33478 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1511 unique users in 10574 transactions
14. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
15. 30306 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1474 unique users in 8018 transactions
16. 30292 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1758 unique users in 7016 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 26572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 606 unique users in 6527 transactions
19. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
20. 24590 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1432 unique users in 9844 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 20554 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1865 unique users in 4349 transactions
23. 17657 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1835 unique users in 7960 transactions
24. 17482 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1227 unique users in 9724 transactions
25. 17305 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 761 unique users in 6470 transactions
26. 17231 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 576 unique users in 8157 transactions
27. 16320 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2024 unique users in 6638 transactions
28. 15768 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1361 unique users in 8809 transactions
29. 15418 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 649 unique users in 5524 transactions
30. 15027 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1709 unique users in 7841 transactions
31. 14655 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1117 unique users in 1815 transactions
32. 14576 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3187 unique users in 7659 transactions
33. 14090 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1395 unique users in 7753 transactions
34. 13938 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1169 unique users in 8517 transactions
35. 13861 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1308 unique users in 5974 transactions
36. 13778 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 668 unique users in 3663 transactions
37. 13751 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 841 unique users in 6431 transactions
38. 13663 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 868 unique users in 4378 transactions
39. 12648 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1247 unique users in 6886 transactions
40. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
41. 11060 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 550 unique users in 4019 transactions
42. 9322 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 598 unique users in 7866 transactions
43. 9140 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 538 unique users in 7178 transactions
44. 9009 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 769 unique users in 7674 transactions
45. 8938 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 696 unique users in 2706 transactions
46. 8815 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1077 unique users in 3804 transactions
47. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
48. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
49. 8587 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 337 unique users in 3432 transactions
50. 8424 Merit sent by igehhh (#1045971) to 592 unique users in 3884 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26781. 1 Merit sent by 3btc (#69960) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26782. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26783. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26784. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26785. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26786. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26787. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26788. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26789. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26790. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26791. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26792. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26793. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26794. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26795. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26796. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26797. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26798. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26799. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26800. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26801. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26802. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26803. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26804. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26805. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26806. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26807. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26808. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26809. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26810. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26811. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26812. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26813. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26814. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26815. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26816. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26817. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26818. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26819. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26820. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26821. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26822. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26823. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26824. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26825. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26826. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26827. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26828. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26829. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26830. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 351478 (14.42%)
Tuesday 349388 (14.33%)
Wednesday 349237 (14.33%)
Thursday 371065 (15.22%)
Friday 369494 (15.16%)
Saturday 321607 (13.19%)
Sunday 324833 (13.32%)
Total: 2437102
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
5. Post 67319569 (unedited backup) (by Meuserna) (scraped on Sat Nov 7 00:14:25 CET 2026) in TANGEM WALLET: An Innovative Seedles Cold Wallet Setup:
Proper seed/keys backup has always been an integral part of Bitcoin and being your own bank.
I say this with all due respect.
I fully understand your position, and I also respect the thinking behind both of those.
I wouldn’t be a self-custody maxi and a privacy maxi if I didn’t agree with that.
What I think differently is that for small amounts of Satoshi, I am willing to exchange trust for convenience.
Tangem wallet and custodial Lightning apps are a good compromise for small amounts if they improve the user experience of Bitcoin.
I don’t see how using a custodial service (yes, even an exchange) to use a small amount of money can hinder the properties of Bitcoin.
Small amounts. Yes. We're in agreement. Personally, I still wouldn't use Tangem since it's closed source, and blind signing (which is what Tangem does) comes with additional risks... not to mention the device calls itself seedless even though it uses a seed but it doesn't give the user access to the entropy. That's bad in so many ways...
But, yeah, for small amounts, I understand favoring convenience over maximum security.
Too many people don't understand the risks though, and they're using things like Tangem or even exchanges to hold large sums of Bitcoin. I wish we, as a community, did a better job of helping people understand risks and best practices. Even many devs don't follow best practices because their goal is to sell products like Ledger or Tangem.
6. Post 67319405 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Fri Nov 6 23:19:07 CET 2026) in TANGEM WALLET: An Innovative Seedles Cold Wallet Setup:
Proper seed/keys backup has always been an integral part of Bitcoin and being your own bank.
I say this with all due respect.
I fully understand your position, and I also respect the thinking behind both of those.
I wouldn’t be a self-custody maxi and a privacy maxi if I didn’t agree with that.
What I think differently is that for small amounts of Satoshi, I am willing to exchange trust for convenience.
Tangem wallet and custodial Lightning apps are a good compromise for small amounts if they improve the user experience of Bitcoin.
I don’t see how using a custodial service (yes, even an exchange) to use a small amount of money can hinder the properties of Bitcoin.
7. Post 67319297 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Fri Nov 6 22:48:31 CET 2026) in Do not buy Keystone hardware wallet until new ones are produced:
Does anyone know where this WebAuth key is stored? I guess it's in the secure element. One question worth asking is, couldn't they replace that secure element with one that has the new WebAuth key imported in it? It's still costly but it wouldn't be as big of a loss for the company as completely destroying close to 20,000 perfectly functioning units and having to replace them with new ones.
It would not be a bad idea to do a product call back replace what is necessary to solve the problem at least.
Damn. 2026 is a really bad year for Hardware Wallets it seems. At this point I can not even imagine ever wanting to purchase one ever again. I was paranoid enough before, but after all these incidents I rather not own any at all and have my peace of mind.
8. Post 67319071 (unedited backup) (by joniboini) (scraped on Fri Nov 6 21:42:37 CET 2026) in Do not buy Keystone hardware wallet until new ones are produced:
Does anyone know where this WebAuth key is stored? I guess it's in the secure element. One question worth asking is, couldn't they replace that secure element with one that has the new WebAuth key imported in it?
From the second hand info that I read, some of them mentioned about "write once" storage. I assumed this mean the storage is embedded into something that's irreplaceable or difficult to separate and replace easily. I guess they'll probably scrap and use anything that's easy to disassemble and only destroy the sensitive parts instead.
9. Post 67318970 (unedited backup) (by Meuserna) (scraped on Fri Nov 6 21:09:43 CET 2026) in The simple analogies for hardware wallets. :
...Coldcard has almost all the characteristics that you mentioned but some people said it is not completely open source.
It's not open-source at all. Coldcard's code is source-verifiable, meaning it's publicly available for scrutiny. If you know how to inspect and audit code, you can do that with Coldcard just like you can do with Trezor and any other open-source code.
Open-source means you can use the code however you like. Copy all of it, modify it, add to it, create your own product with it and sell it. You could create the Karl_3000 hardware wallet, keep it open-source and sell it.
Coldcard's source-verifiable code doesn't allow you to do that. A Karl_3000 hardware wallet couldn't be legally built and sold using Coldcard's code.
[/quote
THIS. Here's why it matters.
ColdCard's code was published and verifiable, but other devs couldn't use it in their own work, so they had no incentive to read it. Why bother?
But even if other devs did read ColdCard's code, there's a huuuge difference between reading code and using code in your own work. When you use somebody else's code in your own work, things can behave in unexpected ways and you have to dig into the code, line by line, to figure out why. That's where it becomes easier to find bugs.
The fact that Coinkite intentionally mislead users into thinking ColdCard's code was open source when it was not is a perfect example of why ColdCard, Rodolfo Novak (NVK) and Peter Gray (Doc-Hex) should never be trusted again. Never.
But too many people in this space are gadget-guys who think the calculators are cool, and Tangem cards are cool, and Ledger gadgets are cool.
Bitcoin is open source. Any code you use to secure your Bitcoin should be open source too. No exceptions. If your keys depend on code that isn't open source, you can't be sure your keys are safe.
Obviously, if you're only securing a few hundred bucks worth of Bitcoin, none of this really matters. But if you want Bitcoin to be part of your financial future, it makes no sense to even consider cool-factor, and it makes no sense to prioritize convenience over security.
10. Post 67316627 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Fri Nov 6 09:01:14 CET 2026) in SCAM upozorenja Zbirni topic:
Zanimljivo da na
web stranici još uvijek imaju podatak da tvrtka djeluje od 2018. godine s 0 sigurnosnih incidenata:
Ne znam misle li pod time da su imali 0 krađa kriptovaluta s Keystone walleta, ali po meni je curenje korisničkih podataka prilično ozbiljan sigurnosni incident.
Sigurno će ta tablica ostati kakva je i sada. I ovo što im se desilo neće uvrstiti pod sigurnosni propust/incident. Kriptovalute nisu ukradene sa njihovih uređaja i gubitak privatnosti neće smatrati sigurnosnim problemom koji čini tu tablicu nevažećom. Ako bi se u budućnosti desio neki sigurnosni propust onda bi tu tablicu sklonili sa svoje stranice a ne promijenili 0 u 1.
''Data deletion system fails''? Mislim stvarno, kaj je baš toliko teško obrisati stare podatke ili ne primjetiti da stari podaci još uvijek nisu obrisani?
Ma znali su da tu nešto ne štima i da se podaci ne brišu samo ih nije bilo briga. Sva ostala priča je samo mazanje očiju javnosti. Sad su odjednom nakon ovog incidenta unaprijedili svoje metode pa se vrše provjere svaki dan kako se osobni podaci ne bi čuvali duže od 90 dana. Automatski sustavi vrše monitoring i šalju obavijesti o korisnicima čije podatke će trebati izbrisati. Sve je to moglo biti rađeno i prije. Nije ta tehnologija izmišljena nakon 20.10.
Da, to je čini se problem kod mnogih takvih firmi, naprave osnovne stvari, po defaultu a ne potrude se provjeriti sve aspekte sigurnosti, ne provjeravaju svaki dan ažuriranja programa, ne čitaju poruke... jer im je to dodatni posao i ne čini se važnim dok se naravno nešto ne dogodi a onda se pospemo pepelom i svečano obećamo da ćemo bolje paziti i da se to više nikada neće dogoditi
Koliko vidim, tvrde da podaci o karticama i plaćanjima, osobne iskaznice i drugi osjetljivi podaci nisu kompromitirani, i valjda bi im trebali vjerovati da je tako no ipak su u svoje mjere opreza uključili i gotovo 13 000 neplaćenih checkout zapisa.
11. Post 67314112 (unedited backup) (by julerz12) (scraped on Thu Nov 5 14:41:19 CET 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:
If you want to participate in a small giveaway from Earnbet, keep reading.
It's simple: You need to guess which slot logo hides behind the silhouette.
- Guess the name of the slot game.
- Repost and tag a friend in your post.
~SNIP~
I'm about 50% certain that this is RIP City.
That silhouette on the right side matches the character on RIP City. Not sure about the one on the left, though.
EarnBet has also launched another simple giveaway, here:
https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2118332533335368036
12. Post 67313784 (unedited backup) (by panjul07) (scraped on Thu Nov 5 12:57:13 CET 2026) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
Honestly, I really hate how so many crypto gambling sites use multi accounts as an excuse to screw over legit gamblers thanks to their TOS. The real problem is when gamblers use multiple accounts to exploit bonuses and other shady stuff.
You can't really blame them. It's because of the dishonest players and abusers that some innocent individuals get caught up in the storm. Abusers use multiple accounts and VPNs. They abuse bonuses, get around betting/wagering restrictions, and other things. We have heard excuses like it's not my account, it's my brother's, uncle's, father's, neighbor's, etc. man times.
That's true but there can be a case where the system of a casino make a false detection which make a user with no other account become a victim.
I experienced myself in 2-3 casinos where I wanted to create an account but I received an immediate warning message that I have created an account before while it was my first time visit the casino to create an account.
Of course getting immediate message like this is better so I have no chance to make deposit compared to if the casino let me deposit and play and use the multi account terms later upon withdrawal.
13. Post 67313230 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Thu Nov 5 09:17:19 CET 2026) in TANGEM WALLET: An Innovative Seedles Cold Wallet Setup:
I've been doing some research on this Tangem wallet, I am trying to come up with al alternative to my airgapped device, you know, the don't put your eggs in one basket advice?
What exactly draws you to the Tangem? If you want something with smart cards, there are other options. Open-source ones. For example, Satochip. Or Keycard and Keycard Shell. If Tangem disappeared tomorrow, you wouldn't necessarily lose your coins, but you depend on someone to build a usable app for you. Maybe you can or want to do it yourself. If not, you'll have to wait a week, a month, a year... until you will be able to spend your bitcoin. That doesn't seem very attractive to me.
My reason to use Tangem:
- Totally anonymous credit card form factor in my wallet
- Innovative “seedless” custody approach. Peace of mind of seeed backup via physical cards. Worth a try for pocket money.
In my opinion, Keycard is the best substitute, if you really hate closed source (totally legitimate position).
14. Post 67313155 (unedited backup) (by satscraper) (scraped on Thu Nov 5 08:42:56 CET 2026) in TANGEM WALLET: An Innovative Seedles Cold Wallet Setup:
I've been doing some research on this Tangem wallet, I am trying to come up with al alternative to my airgapped device, you know, the don't put your eggs in one basket advice?
What exactly draws you to the Tangem? If you want something with smart cards, there are other options. Open-source ones. For example, Satochip. Or Keycard and Keycard Shell. If Tangem disappeared tomorrow, you wouldn't necessarily lose your coins, but you depend on someone to build a usable app for you. Maybe you can or want to do it yourself. If not, you'll have to wait a week, a month, a year... until you will be able to spend your bitcoin. That doesn't seem very attractive to me.
Tangem Pay could be the answer. No other HW designed in the card format offers similar functionality. Regarding disappeared-tomorrow-lose-your-coins that argument is not applicable here because as I said in my previous post Tangem has the option to be initialized with SEED. So users are free in what mode to use.
15. Post 67313078 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Thu Nov 5 08:00:07 CET 2026) in SCAM upozorenja Zbirni topic:
Keystone nije velika kompanija. Ovo će ih sigurno finansijski mnogo zaboljeti. Baš me zanima da li će uspjeti da pronađu neku alternativu da izbjegnu uništavanje tolikog broja uređaja čiju su proizvodnju platili a zaradu od prodaje nikad neće vidjeti.
/snip
Zanimljivo da na
web stranici još uvijek imaju podatak da tvrtka djeluje od 2018. godine s 0 sigurnosnih incidenata:
Ne znam misle li pod time da su imali 0 krađa kriptovaluta s Keystone walleta, ali po meni je curenje korisničkih podataka prilično ozbiljan sigurnosni incident.
16. Post 67311569 (unedited backup) (by MisFoxie) (scraped on Wed Nov 4 19:45:55 CET 2026) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
I am also running the risk of being accused of multi-accounting and breaking casino terms and conditions of a gambling platform if/when I create a real account there, play, and win something significant that might trigger a security check. A check like that could find IPs connected to multiple accounts or a device ID connected to multiple accounts. I do have genuine accounts on some of the casinos as well, not dummy accounts I don't care about.
Honestly, I really hate how so many crypto gambling sites use multi accounts as an excuse to screw over legit gamblers thanks to their TOS. The real problem is when gamblers use multiple accounts to exploit bonuses and other shady stuff.
Some sites have zero issues with multi accounts though as long as the gamblers don't utilise them unfairly and one such example that comes to my mind is Stake.
They make accusations about internal matters like these which you cannot prove even if you want to. They can lock your account using excuses like multi accounting, rule violations and many others. In some areas of some countries shared ips are used so many users may have the same IP or two people may use the same IP. That doesn't mean it proves they are the same person. I think casinos need to take responsibility for these things by clearly mentioning them in their ToS and properly investigating such cases before making any decision regarding an account.
17. Post 67311444 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Wed Nov 4 19:04:55 CET 2026) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
I am also running the risk of being accused of multi-accounting and breaking casino terms and conditions of a gambling platform if/when I create a real account there, play, and win something significant that might trigger a security check. A check like that could find IPs connected to multiple accounts or a device ID connected to multiple accounts. I do have genuine accounts on some of the casinos as well, not dummy accounts I don't care about.
Honestly, I really hate how so many crypto gambling sites use multi accounts as an excuse to screw over legit gamblers thanks to their TOS. The real problem is when gamblers use multiple accounts to exploit bonuses and other shady stuff.
Some sites have zero issues with multi accounts though as long as the gamblers don't utilise them unfairly and one such example that comes to my mind is Stake.
18. Post 67311328 (unedited backup) (by Cryptomultiplier) (scraped on Wed Nov 4 18:31:55 CET 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:
Looks like the EarnBet team has finally listened to what most of us have previously suggested here: add more coin/blockchain support.
...
EarnBet has also announced over Telegram that they have expanded their games catalog by another 3,000 titles. The casino now hosts over 10,000 games.
Among the new titles are Le Vampire, Sweet Bonanza Pop and Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter, Gates of Olympus Super Scatter, Demonic Dolls, Duck Hunters 2, Six Feet Under, San Quentin Manhunt, Rat Royale, and many more.
With more users rejecting legacy network bottlenecks this new expansion by Earnbet to add more coin/blockchain support that includes L2 and EVM chains is a good thing.
Also, with the addition of about 10,000 games makes Earnbet a full scale competitor in the market against other igaming platforms. With 3,000 titles added, it shows they are ready to cater for the high rollers chasing max win caps.
This makes them a hot platform that can retain and bring in more players with expensive taste that appeals to the adrenaline spike that is much desired by high variance crypto casino players.
Nice one!
19. Post 67308151 (unedited backup) (by notblox1) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 20:52:55 CET 2026) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
We had a few changes. Cloudbet and MintDice are new names that made it into the list of casinos that have the lowest withdrawal amounts. VAVADA made a big change. Their minimum withdrawal amount increased from $10 to $100. There were a few other small changes.
I never used Vavada casino so I dont care about their changes, but it is good to see other casinos reduced their withdrawal amounts.
For Cloudbet I think I have account but I dont use it very often.
Yes, I have throwaway accounts on all casinos. Most of them show the data when you go to the withdrawal section. Some don't. If they have live chat, I ask customer support what the minimums are. If there is no live chat but they have a FAQ section that mentions the numbers I need, then I take the data from there. Lastly, if there is no information, like with 8Bet, I leave it as it is in the table. Maybe it's wrong but there is no quick way to check it.
Amazing!
You spent a lot of time researching this, and I think you did better job than some casino review websites that are claiming to be professional.
I was doing some casino research in past and I know how time consuming this can be.
20. Post 67306876 (unedited backup) (by Lontor) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 14:53:07 CET 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :
That's what happened to Krux if I am not mistaken. I think the software is no longer being updated and maintained. I could be wrong, but I remember reading something like that. -snip-
New features and improvements will not be added, though, unless someone forks it and continues its development.
New maintainers came in, Jean Do on GitHub:
jdlcdlPretty fast for Krux got a new maintainers, started from Jeff, to Odudex, and now Jean Do.
In about 2 months, and the new maintainers released his first release update
Version 26.09.0 3 weeks ago:.
I have a family member who happened to have purchased ColdCard hardware wallet before the attack that happened last time, he showed me some hours ago and he hasn't deposited any amount of crypto coins in it.
It's why I find this thread to ask this question, is it still a good idea to keep using Cold card? Are you saying here that someone new takes over the company or it's just new maintainers you are talking about?
What do you have to say about this advice? Should I tell him to avoid using the hardware wallet and get Trezor or he should keep using this Coldcard hardware wallet? What would you do if it's someone close to you?
21. Post 67306254 (unedited backup) (by ultrloa) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 11:36:01 CET 2026) in Hack and data leak across RoboEx, Mamura, SicretEx, karma-exchanger, ComCash...:
It is also strange that no loss of funds has been reported...
Maybe it was never the goal of the person who carried out the hack to steal the crypto. It looks weird writing this, I know. It looks more like it's an attack on the exchange owners and staff members and the way they handled sensitive information of customers. He is calling them out for doing a bad job. But you are right about the potential dangers of downloading and opening those files.
I'm thinking about possible two scenarios happening here.
Maybe they just want to damage the reputation of those platforms, since most of them says that they don't require KYC. But at the end of the day, they are still collecting the data of their costumers.
Second is maybe they see the importance of the data they stole from those platforms, since they can use it for long term. They can do profiling to identify who are their high valued targets.
22. Post 67305981 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 09:54:25 CET 2026) in Hack and data leak across RoboEx, Mamura, SicretEx, karma-exchanger, ComCash...:
It is also strange that no loss of funds has been reported...
Maybe it was never the goal of the person who carried out the hack to steal the crypto.
+1
The whole story is highly suspicious. I am still waiting for a response from the team to find out what happened, but it is clear that the hackers are very familiar with the platform—or, at the very least, there is some connection between them.
23. Post 67305942 (unedited backup) (by TopTort777) (scraped on Tue Nov 3 09:38:49 CET 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:
I understand Betwrong approach to crash game well. Setting 100x is a real challenge, and it is exciting to catch it, because that is a rare multiplier. I dont get those people who set 1.01 cashout and play with large or small bets. It is even funny because it is so lame when someone place hundreds and thousands with 1.01 auto cashout. Guy risk such a huge amount of money just to get a dollar or 10 bucks
Both approaches make sense depending on what you are trying to achieve. You mentioned placing hundreds or thousands of dollars on a low odds like 1.01. It makes sense if you are satisfied with your win but have a wagering requirement to meet before you can withdraw, for example. If you have to meet additional playthrough requirements and don't care to increase the payouts any further, betting $100 or $1000 two/three times on 1.01 odds helps to maximize your chances of winning as much as possible.
I think that placing such huge amounts with lowest possible odds is a stupid idea. You still have decent chances of losing, when reward amount is so tiny. I have experience of burning with such approach. I would better bet 100 bucks with odds close to 1.50 and lose, than bet same amount and lose with 1.01 odd. Loosing with such lowest odds are so disappointing.
24. Post 67304573 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 21:12:38 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ Bundesliga GOALFEST ⚽ Nov 7-8:
Courtesy tag for those who love free bets
Smartvirus
jayce
LFC_Bitcoin
Porf
hosemary
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
unrank
darxiaomi
Nheer
KTChampions
arallmuus
Strongkored
leea-1334
fmbet
Woodie
LUCKMCFLY
CharlesTim
xLays
goodpunt
Mahdirakib
Ryu_Ar1
buwaytress
Smartprofit
Dump3er
Zwei
jeremypwr
tiCeR
Pmalek
Harkorede
mv1986
el che
Slissy
logitechmouse
Koal84
xandry
hilariousandco
slaman29
lakai01
notblox1
25. Post 67304571 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 21:12:26 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ Premier League GOALFEST ⚽ Nov 7-8:
Courtesy tag for those who love free bets
Smartvirus
jayce
LFC_Bitcoin
Porf
hosemary
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
unrank
darxiaomi
Nheer
KTChampions
arallmuus
Strongkored
leea-1334
fmbet
Woodie
LUCKMCFLY
CharlesTim
xLays
goodpunt
Mahdirakib
Ryu_Ar1
buwaytress
Smartprofit
Dump3er
Zwei
jeremypwr
tiCeR
Pmalek
Harkorede
mv1986
el che
Slissy
logitechmouse
Koal84
xandry
hilariousandco
slaman29
lakai01
notblox1
26. Post 67304570 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 21:12:14 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ LaLiga GOALFEST ⚽ Nov 7-8:
Courtesy tag for those who love free bets
Smartvirus
jayce
LFC_Bitcoin
Porf
hosemary
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
unrank
darxiaomi
Nheer
KTChampions
arallmuus
Strongkored
leea-1334
fmbet
Woodie
LUCKMCFLY
CharlesTim
xLays
goodpunt
Mahdirakib
Ryu_Ar1
buwaytress
Smartprofit
Dump3er
Zwei
jeremypwr
tiCeR
Pmalek
Harkorede
mv1986
el che
Slissy
logitechmouse
Koal84
xandry
hilariousandco
slaman29
lakai01
notblox1
27. Post 67302953 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 13:27:37 CET 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:
There are security issues with BTCPay Server again.
There have been reports that hot wallets on BTCPay Servers are being swept by scammers. BTCPay Server's investigation discovered vulnerabilities in versions 2.4.1 and older. The team recommends that if you are running older instances of the software, to shut them down. There are no reports of drains for users running the latest 2.4.7 release of BTCPay Server. The best option is to update it or alternatively shut it down.
https://x.com/BtcpayServer/status/2117020340815819262Again and again, for some reason these attacks have been carried out in succession since the Coldcard, Ledger and Exchange Tier 1 attacks and now BTCPay Server is the latest target.
Is this some kind of organized attack targeting all the crypto ecosystems that exist today?
Most probably this is done by organize groups. Since individual hacker cannot probably penetrate easily on those platforms.
Although BTC didn't disclosed their potential suspects, but I think it might get revealed soon.
With recent hacking issue happened nowadays. It seems that the hackers became more dangerous. I will not get surprised to see another big platform will get victimized by hacking in future. I think we need to prepare on it and stop relying on exchange or other third party platform when it comes storing our funds.
28. Post 67302708 (unedited backup) (by DaveF) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 12:25:55 CET 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:
Update:
BTCPay Server has released version 2.4.3-rc4 of the software. It contains a security update that addresses the vulnerabilities that the Bitcoin Red Team and other researchers identified and reported. This is a release candidate but BTCPay Server still recommends that users perform the upgrade. Bugs may be present, though.
More information is available here:
https://x.com/btcpayserver/status/2087959120515101035 There are security issues with BTCPay Server again.
There have been reports that hot wallets on BTCPay Servers are being swept by scammers. BTCPay Server's investigation discovered vulnerabilities in versions 2.4.1 and older. The team recommends that if you are running older instances of the software, to shut them down. There are no reports of drains for users running the latest 2.4.7 release of BTCPay Server. The best option is to update it or alternatively shut it down.
https://x.com/BtcpayServer/status/2117020340815819262OK, I am really confused.
The old version that had a vulnerability that was reported & fixed back in August and people were still running even older versions of it?
With 2.4.4 & 2.4.5 & 2.4.6 all being posted as security releases I can see missing one or even 2 of them letting things shake out a bit, but running 3+ month old versions. What are people thinking?
Not victim blaming here, but it does make you wonder why.
-Dave
29. Post 67302305 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 09:32:49 CET 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:
There have been reports that hot wallets on BTCPay Servers are being swept by scammers. BTCPay Server's investigation discovered vulnerabilities in versions 2.4.1 and older. The team recommends that if you are running older instances of the software, to shut them down.
The attack targeted .macaroon credential files used by LND through which merchant Lightning wallets could be drained.
The good side of the story is that the Bitcoin base protocol was not affected and thus the Lightning Network settlements will be affected.
Frankly, with the limited use of the Lightning Network (and low fees), such attacks may make the scope of LN much less than in the past.
30. Post 67302265 (unedited backup) (by taufik123) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 09:15:01 CET 2026) in Critical vulnerability discovered in BTCPay Server:
There are security issues with BTCPay Server again.
There have been reports that hot wallets on BTCPay Servers are being swept by scammers. BTCPay Server's investigation discovered vulnerabilities in versions 2.4.1 and older. The team recommends that if you are running older instances of the software, to shut them down. There are no reports of drains for users running the latest 2.4.7 release of BTCPay Server. The best option is to update it or alternatively shut it down.
https://x.com/BtcpayServer/status/2117020340815819262Again and again, for some reason these attacks have been carried out in succession since the Coldcard, Ledger and Exchange Tier 1 attacks and now BTCPay Server is the latest target.
Is this some kind of organized attack targeting all the crypto ecosystems that exist today?
31. Post 67301653 (unedited backup) (by Meuserna) (scraped on Mon Nov 2 01:39:37 CET 2026) in TANGEM WALLET: An Innovative Seedles Cold Wallet Setup:
I also would never trust a "seedless" approach.
Tangem can operate in both seedless and standard (with seed) mode if I am not mistaken. Users have a choice which one to use.
Users have a choice, but the way they have to enter the seed phrase is poison. No one who cares about the security of their Bitcoin should ever enter a seed phrase on a phone.
Also, Tangem's use of the word "seedless" is flat-out wrong. What they actually mean is "without a seed
phrase." Tangem's so-called "seedless" wallets do use a seed. They don't use seed phrases, but they do have a seed. That's how deterministic Bitcoin wallets work. This is basic Bitcoin wallet stuff. The fact that Tangem intentionally uses misleading terminology makes me trust them even less than I already do. And I don't trust closed source firmware.
A seed phrase gives the user human readable entropy as a backup.
If you don't use a seed phrase with Tangem to generate the seed, you have no human readable entropy for your wallet backup. That's dangerous. But worse than that, you have no ability to prove the entropy Tangem uses to generate the seed is truly random or even safe. ColdCard proved why that matters, because their entropy was trash and their users got robbed.
And somebody is going to read this and still not understand that Tangem's supposedly "seedless" wallets do, in fact, have a seed, because Tangem's terminology gets in the way of people learning Bitcoin basics instead of helping.
32. Post 67300833 (unedited backup) (by Husna QA) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 20:57:55 CET 2026) in [Info] DT 1 dan DT 2 Berasal Dari Indonesia [Update tiap Bulan]:
DT Member - November 2026DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 111 user (berkurang 5 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)
Daftar lama: theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
Swordsoffreedom
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
Lucius
TryNinja
holydarkness
Lafu
Cointxz
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
hosemary
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
KTChampions
icopress
sheenshane
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
mole0815
bitmover
Lakai01
morvillz7z
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
inspace
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
decodx
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
ZAINmalik75
AHOYBRAUSE
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
SirJohnVonSlotty
Mia Chloe
| ----- | Daftar Baru: theymos
HostFat
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
Swordsoffreedom
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
Lucius
Lafu
Cointxz
polymerbit
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
MrMojoRising26
Free Market Capitalist
ZAINmalik75
AHOYBRAUSE
PowerGlove
SirJohnVonSlotty
Mia Chloe
|
| ----- | DT1 dari Indonesia: AakZaki
roycilik
Husna QA
abhiseshakana
YOSHIE
|
|
Sumber: theymos |
DT update log
Daftar perubahan DT1Sumber: LoyceV |
DefaultTrust changes
33. Post 67300624 (unedited backup) (by babo) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 19:56:31 CET 2026) in [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana:
Lista New Users:
theymos (CONFIRMED)
HostFat (CONFIRMED)
OgNasty (CONFIRMED)
Vod (CONFIRMED)
vapourminer (CONFIRMED)
Foxpup (CONFIRMED)
philipma1957 (CONFIRMED)
babo
Cyrus (CONFIRMED)
Welsh (CONFIRMED)
ibminer (CONFIRMED)
d5000
joker_josue (CONFIRMED)
Pmalek (CONFIRMED)
albon (CONFIRMED)
wwzsocki (CONFIRMED)
Timelord2067 (CONFIRMED)
jeremypwr (CONFIRMED)
EFS (CONFIRMED)
Swordsoffreedom (CONFIRMED)
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco (CONFIRMED)
arulbero
buckrogers (CONFIRMED)
Buchi-88 (CONFIRMED)
willi9974 (CONFIRMED)
JayJuanGee (CONFIRMED)
achow101 (CONFIRMED)
DaveF (CONFIRMED)
examplens (CONFIRMED)
nutildah (CONFIRMED)
irfan_pak10 (CONFIRMED)
yahoo62278 (CONFIRMED)
bitbollo (CONFIRMED)
LFC_Bitcoin (CONFIRMED)
o_solo_miner (CONFIRMED)
mocacinno (CONFIRMED)
Real-Duke (CONFIRMED)
LoyceV (CONFIRMED)
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10 (CONFIRMED)
Lucius (CONFIRMED)
Lafu (CONFIRMED)
Cointxz (CONFIRMED)
polymerbit
tweetious
AakZaki (CONFIRMED)
giammangiato (CONFIRMED)
crwth (CONFIRMED)
Ale88 (CONFIRMED)
Kryptowerk (CONFIRMED)
hosemary (CONFIRMED)
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood (CONFIRMED)
igebotz (CONFIRMED)
roycilik (CONFIRMED)
CryptopreneurBrainboss (CONFIRMED)
hugeblack (CONFIRMED)
El duderino_
KTChampions (CONFIRMED)
Trofo
icopress (CONFIRMED)
JeromeTash
logfiles (CONFIRMED)
Bitcoin_Arena (CONFIRMED)
GazetaBitcoin (CONFIRMED)
tvplus006
mole0815 (CONFIRMED)
bitmover (CONFIRMED)
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01 (CONFIRMED)
Husna QA
fillippone (CONFIRMED)
abhiseshakana (CONFIRMED)
The Cryptovator (CONFIRMED)
lovesmayfamilis (CONFIRMED)
DireWolfM14 (CONFIRMED)
notblox1 (CONFIRMED)
YOSHIE
inspace (CONFIRMED)
jokers10
Awaklara (CONFIRMED)
geophphreigh (CONFIRMED)
zasad@ (CONFIRMED)
Rikafip (CONFIRMED)
Etranger (CONFIRMED)
NotATether (CONFIRMED)
Stalker22 (CONFIRMED)
decodx (CONFIRMED)
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim (CONFIRMED)
MrMojoRising26
Free Market Capitalist (CONFIRMED)
ZAINmalik75 (CONFIRMED)
AHOYBRAUSE (CONFIRMED)
PowerGlove (CONFIRMED)
SirJohnVonSlotty (CONFIRMED)
Mia Chloe (CONFIRMED)
| . . . . | Lista Utenti Italiani:
|
Link Utili:
34. Post 67300618 (unedited backup) (by theymos) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 19:55:01 CET 2026) in DT update log:
This month 111 users were eligible.
Old:
theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
Swordsoffreedom
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
Lucius
TryNinja
holydarkness
Lafu
Cointxz
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
hosemary
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
KTChampions
icopress
sheenshane
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
mole0815
bitmover
Lakai01
morvillz7z
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
inspace
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
decodx
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
ZAINmalik75
AHOYBRAUSE
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
SirJohnVonSlotty
Mia Chloe
New:
theymos
HostFat
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
Swordsoffreedom
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
Lucius
Lafu
Cointxz
polymerbit
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
MrMojoRising26
Free Market Capitalist
ZAINmalik75
AHOYBRAUSE
PowerGlove
SirJohnVonSlotty
Mia Chloe
35. Post 67299294 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 12:13:37 CET 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:
In crash games I never cash out at 1.50x. Since my bet is small, "winning" at 1.50x makes no sense. I aim at 100x at least.
I understand. Aiming for those high multipliers also means that you have significantly more losses than wins overall. As long as you are not worried about any of that and you look at gambling as entertainment and a way to spend x amount of time, then that's fine.
Maybe the most important part out here is they don't chase to much, then became so greedy.
Because by the time they fall badly and think outrageous things, like they should bet more since they feel that they are going to win. While in reality they are losing a lot and bad luck hit them hard. They might earn more stress on that situations.
So best to have control not only with their spending, but also their emotion. Because if they are lucky, maybe they might going to hit that huge win. If not at least they enjoy or even win some amount from the games they are playing.
36. Post 67298953 (unedited backup) (by Betwrong) (scraped on Sun Nov 1 09:07:44 CET 2026) in 🎲EarnBet.io🎲FREE Faucet❗🎲0.5% House Edge🎲100% Decentralized🎲Provably Fair🎲:
~ Currently, my personal record is 1,100x with a $0.20 bet. I won more than $200 with that and was super happy. If I would win $400 ... I think, you can imagine.
That's the eternal dilemma. If you play with a low base bet, your final payout is lower even if you win on a big multiplier. But you risk less in case you win. On the other hand, a higher base bet also means a higher payout at the same multiplier. It also means you loss much more money if you are unsuccessful.
For me it's not a dilemma. I gamble for fun, not for making money, and that's why I never make big bets. I mean, I never bet as much as $10, unless it's required by the rules of some competition. I hope for a high multiplier and if I hit it, I'm content with a $100-$200 win.
The same dilemma is there when you play crash games, for example. Risk less with a smaller bet and lower multiplier and be successful and win 1.50x your odds. It's not bad. But if you see that the rocket went as high as 200x, for example, you tell yourself that you should have taken a greater risk.
In crash games I never cash out at 1.50x. Since my bet is small "winning" at 1.50x makes no sense. I aim at 100x at least. It's a bit stressful to play crash like that manually, so, I'm doing it on autobet, or set Auto cashout, as you can do it on EarnBet.io:
I'd suggest to add an option of setting number of bets. I usually set it at 20 or 30, and hope that my 100x or 1,000x will be hit within that range.
37. Post 67297769 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Sat Oct 31 20:54:13 CET 2026) in A better crypto wallet for Bitcoin? :
The fact remains that there are plenty of products on the market, you have to be very careful about the products you use for your crypto. Now seems to the best time to remind people that hardware wallets come with their own problems and it is not worth taking the risk.
No matter how
good any product might be (or claim to be), the fact remains that closed source is always going to be a risk when crypto is at stake. If any software cannot be independently evaluated and assessed in order to be deemed safe or secure, then the best course of action has to be to avoid using it.
And no source code! If we criticize Ledger for being closed-source (just one of the many things they deserve to be criticized for), then the same rules should apply to other products. Tangem being one of them. I don't see what advantage a Tangem would have over the competition. The seedless setup? The smart cards? Naah.
If someone wants to move away from traditional hardware wallets because of what's been happening lately, it makes sense to upgrade to something more secure, not the other way around. Stateless, airgapped, offline, etc.
![getting my dick stomped on an anvil [sexually explicit link]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CBT_Trampling_2.jpg){kind=link}