Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:26:59 AM

Altcoins podforum nam je u minusu. Grin

Mislim da je ovo prvi put da vidim minus u analizama. Znači da je neko izbrisao jedan post u odnosu na mjesec prije.
Čudno mi je bilo što se na listi onih koji su podjelili najviše merita nalaze d5000 i GazetaBitcoin ali pretpostavljam da to ima veze sa ovim prevodima tema što su katanic97 i paco92x radili u posljedne vrijeme.

Da, altcoins sekcija nam je dosta pusta, pretpostavljam da je to zato sto su altcoini imali dosta lose rezultate po pitanju cijene. A i takoder, barem po mom misljenju, sto su ljudi stariji i imaju vise iskustva primjecuju kako su altcoini nesigurno i nestabilno ulaganje u odnosu na BTC, pa radije naginju BTC-u.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 30, 2025, 03:53:18 PM

Nikad ne možez znati šta će biti. Ako želiš brzu potvrdu tranksakcije, moraš je preplatiti ali ti ni to ne garantuje da će brzo dobiti prvu potvrdu. Iako se novi Bitcoin blokovi rudare svakih 10 minuta u prosjeku, često se desi da period između dva bloka bude mnogo duži. Tad ne igra ulogu kolike naknade plaćaš, svejedno ćeš čekati. Najbolje je sam pogledati stanje na mempoolu pomoću alata kojeg je Jochen Hoenicke napravio. Obično i mempool space to dosta dobro procjeni.

Nakon što sam duže vrijeme pratio Bitcoin transakcije na mempool stranici, treba mi malo vremena da se naviknem na ovo sučelje. Misliš da je bolje i preciznije od mempool stranice? I koja je uopće razlika između BTC i BTC (default mempool)? Fora mi je što ima opciju praćenja transakcija unazad nekoliko godina, a osim Bitcoina prati ETH, BCH, DOGE, LTC i DASH transakcije.

Quote from: iv4n on June 30, 2025, 03:45:08 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on June 30, 2025, 03:22:20 PM

Quote from: iv4n on June 30, 2025, 07:34:16 AM

...

Maybe it's better to avoid this one. Inter is still the favorites to go through but they may need extra time and/or penalties to get there. They are still playing without Bisseck and Pavard in defense. Another defender, Darmian, is doubtful for tonight's match. Plus, two important individuals in Calhanoglu and Zielinski are injured and can't help in the midfield.

Well, I will share a short story... Yesterday, I gifted a $100 bet to a dear friend from the forum. I place the bet, and he decides what to do with the winnings. If it's a lost bet, then nothing. This was his first bet:

But he didn't want to take the profits; instead, he wanted this:

Today he made a choice... so now there's no avoiding. And I doubt he would ever step down:

I have a lot lower bets, but this one will be a real smash if it happens...

How did this work out for you, I can’t figure out the final part of your results

Quote from: danadc on Today at 05:22:26 PM

Quote from: HeRetiK on Today at 08:38:31 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:57:39 AM

Let's look at your example when the initial bet is $0.001 and you use the Martingale Strategy. Let's say you use it and it never depletes your balance, aka, you never run into a long losing streak and you only have success with Martingale. What did you really gain? $0.001 as the initial bet means that your total profit in each cycle is only $0.001. After 1000 wins, you would have made $1. You put so much work into it for $1. That could only be attractive for someone in a third-work country and only if it works, of course.

There are casinos where you can set up a Martingale bot that you can run unsupervised, so time spent isn't really the issue. The problem is that you're likely to get wiped out by a losing streak before your bot makes any sort of meaningful profit.

That type of bot is for people with a lot of risk, determined that they can lose any amount, I use the martingale but since it is so risky, I do it 1 or 2 times and if I lose, I don't continue and I continue with another strategy If I do it manually, I wouldn't let a bot do it for me, I couldn't.

I used this before and I don't enjoy it. didn't see any enjoyment for using this that's why I used to gamble manually since I can monitor well the sessions I made also the money I spend on gambling.

Also its somehow hard to get wiped out easily and don't want to experience that one when bad luck strikes.

But I guess same with you this is suitable for risk taker people that have huge bankroll since maybe they are capable to automate things then let the game roll without worrying about anything.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 28, 2025, 12:07:05 PM

If you see similar discounts from other brands, don't hesitate to mention them below and I will add them to the list in the OP.

This might be a bit too late since only a few hours are left ^{[assuming that UTC will be used]}, but Bitkey is offering a 21% off until today with code LEDGER ^[source].

Quote from: Pmalek on June 29, 2025, 03:26:08 PM

I am not sure if these offers are related to Ledger's decision to phase out the Nano S or not but it doesn't matter. I will add them to the list.

On that note, Tangem is offering a 10% discount with code SUMMER10 ^{[not sure until when this promo lasts]}.

Evo i pregleda aktivnosti naseg boarda tijekom Svibnja. Pregled je napravljen uz pomoc @DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te @TryNinja Ninjastic.space a sve slike su uploadano na joker_josue TalkImg.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Svibanj 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

Analiza broja postova tijekom Svibnja 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca napisano je 380 postova na nasem boardu sto je odlicno povecanje aktivnosti u odnosu na Travanjske brojke (321 post) te je nastavak pozitvnog trenda koji traje vec mjesecima, od kad nam se pojavilo par novih clanova.

Na ovom chartu se vidi nas oporovak te napredak u zadnjih par mjeseci.

Analiza merita za Svibanj 2025

Tijekom Svibnja je podijeljeno 202 merita sto je solidan pad u odnosu na Travanj iako smo bili dosta aktivniji. Unatoc tome, mislim da je ta brojka i dalje dosta dobra s obzirom na kolicinu napisanih postova te i dalje imamo skroz pristojan merit/post ratio (0.53)

Lista svih koji su podijelili te primili merit na nasem boardu tijekom Svibnja, koja je za 3 clana kraca u odnosu na onu za Travanj. Ono sto se nije promjenilo su imena na vrhu: Pmalek je opet podijelio najvise dok je katanic97 primio najvise merita.

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Svibnja 2025

Unatoc povecanju broja postova od skoro 20% u odnosu na prethodno razdoblje, lista aktivnih clanova se nazalost nije povecala, nego naprotiv smanjila za jednog clana. Na vrhu je opet katanic97 koji je bio jos aktivniji nego mjesec ranije, na drugom mjestu je btcltcdigger, ja sam na trecem mjestu dok je drvena medalja ovaj put rezervirana za Pmaleka. Cheesy

1. katanic97 [63]
2. btcltcdigger [45]
3. Rikafip [38]
4. Pmalek [30]
5. Trofo [30]
6. dkbit98 [27]
7. slackovic [27]
8. cryptofrka [25]
9. examplens [24]
10. ovcijisir [23]
11. paco92x [11]
12. CroBoy12 [9]
13. SirJohnVonSlotty [7]
14. TalkativeCoin [7]
15. VoxelX [6]
16. Lunorael [3]
17. GazetaBitcoin [2]
18. FatFork [1]
19. VashaUdacha777 [1]
20. aquamarin13 [1]

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:22:20 PM

Quote from: iv4n on Today at 07:34:16 AM

Tricky game... I don't know how safe it is to bet on Inter. To bet on goals? This game could easily go either way... It could easily be under 2.5, and it could also go over 5...

There's plenty of time to decide... does anyone have a good suggestion?

Honestly, I get the concerns about Inter's missing players, but I still believe they’ll get the job done in tonight’s match without needing extra time. Sure, the squad isn’t at full strength, but they’ve proven time and again that they can adapt and grind out results through discipline and experience. Fluminense have been impressive, no doubt, but the level of competition now is a different story. I expect Inter to try and settle it within 90 minutes while they still have control and energy.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 29, 2025, 07:02:06 AM

I nakon svih tih godina možda otkriju neku ranjivost koja je prisutna negdje u njihovom softveru. Uređaji koji imaju podršku, dobit će potrebne zakrpe a oni koji nemaju neće. Ako koristiš Ledger sa drugim softverskim novčanicima kao Electrum npr, može se desiti da novi update Electruma dovede do neke nekompatibilnosti sa Ledger uređajima. Ledger bi onda popravio štetu kod novih uređaja ali ti ostaje stari Nano S koji više ne radi sa Electrumom. Bio bi prisiljen da koristiš stariju Electrum verziju i da je više ne nadograđuješ. Tako da ne možeš ni da koristiš šta god Electrum ili neki drugi wallet izbace u budućnosti.

Ne vjerujem da nakon toliko godina na najpopularnijem hardverskom novčaniku može biti greška. To je pročešljano toliko puta...da išta postoji već bi bilo exploita. Također nisam od onih koji electrum instaliraju čim dođe nova zakrpa. Novo nije uvijek bolje pogotovo sa sigurnosnog aspekta. Radije ja pustim druge da testiraju to jedno godinu dana.

Osim naravno u slučaju nekog kritičnog vulrnabilitya.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 29, 2025, 07:02:06 AM

Veći update-i kod blockchaina ne bi imali podršku kod Nano S. Kao što examplens navede primjer Segwit-a ili Taproot nadogradnje. Možda Bitcoin kroz par godina pređe na algoritam koji će štititi mrežu od kvantnih računara. Tu bi podršku Ledger morao omogučiti na svojim uređajima. Nano S je ne bi dobio. Zbog nedostatka memorije ne bi možda ni podržavao novi algoritam jer bi se povečala veličina ključeva i potpisa na blockchainu.

Ovo već je razlog koji prihvaćam. Ali opet ne vjerujem da je algoritam za zaštitu od kvantnih računara moguće kvalitetno napraviti na postojećem hardveru. Nekako mislim da će nam trebati sasvim novi sigurnosni element u priči. Kada dođemo do toga, nekako mislim da će sweep na neki potpuno novi HW wallet biti jedino pravo riješenje. Da se razumijemo ovo je moj take na problem kojeg nisam uopće proučavao i priznajem da nisam dovoljno upućen.

Kvantna mehanika i kompjuteri su nešto što otvara sasvim nove grane znanosti i definitvno zaslužuju dobar dio moje pažnje negdje u bližoj budućnosti.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:22:20 PM

Quote from: iv4n on Today at 07:34:16 AM

Inter have a lot of injured players and especially in defence and this can mean that Inter can concede a goal or more. So i think in this match we will see a lot of goals. Both teams to score for sure and someone will score more then one for sure and i think that will be Inter. Plus also a really good odd on inter to win tonight aswell

Quote from: HeRetiK on Today at 08:38:31 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:57:39 AM

Quote from: PrivacyG on June 29, 2025, 08:29:34 PM

Martingale sounds extremely attractive to a beginner. You have to lose a couple times to realize why things went so wrong. And I heard often enough of gamblers who thought starting with amounts as small as .001 Dollars would take a LONG chain of losses before it drains the entire balance, so they left the balance as it is. It takes a chain of 20 losses from .001 to already lose a thousand.

Courtesy tag for those eligible from R1

Code:

Harkorede
Dump3er
ILuckyGuyI
jayce
LFC_Bitcoin
Soonandwaite
hilariousandco
vivekdhyani1
Ozymandias_DZ
BABY SHOES
holydarkness
Pmalek
BitcoinHunt3r
kryptqnick
notblox1
Barcode_
mv1986
Strongkored
B1g4udge
morvillz7z
Koal-84
cryptofrka
Slissy
slapper
Ryu_Ar1
Betwrong
Buchi-88
KTChampions
mitchr4
buwaytress
xandry
Trofo
famososMuertos
NeuroticFish
CLS63
hosemary
arallmuus
Charles-Tim

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:22:20 PM

Quote from: iv4n on Today at 07:34:16 AM

...

But he didn't want to take the profits; instead, he wanted this:

Today he made a choice... so now there's no avoiding. And I doubt he would ever step down:

I have a lot lower bets, but this one will be a real smash if it happens...

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:57:39 AM

Quote from: PrivacyG on June 29, 2025, 08:29:34 PM

Quote from: SamReomo on June 29, 2025, 03:06:21 PM

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on June 29, 2025, 08:33:04 AM

Playing what? I am sure I have had over 500x playing slots. On the other hand you seem to have missed the point that philipma1957 is asking, he is not saying that he got anything. AFAIK he doesn't gamble.

Played slots and most available games at online casinos but wasn't much lucky in any of those.

it's insane that you have not hit more than 20x on slots, i usually get a 20x in just a few base game spins or a dead bonus buy.
you are either the unluckiest player ever, or maybe you just do a few spins here and there.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 29, 2025, 03:40:32 PM

People learn best based on personal experience. If they ever attempted a strategy like Martingale or some other and had success with it, they are not going to believe people who warn them that it's a risky way to play. Only when they deplete their entire account balance following a series of losses will they say: oh, that's what people tried to warn me about.

if only it took just one time to realize it's a bad idea, so much money would have been saved.
from my experience, people usually think it's just bad luck and that it will surely be different the next time they play martingale.
spoiler alert: it never does. (been there, done that, so i know know, lol)

Quote from: Pmalek on June 28, 2025, 12:07:05 PM

If you see similar discounts from other brands, don't hesitate to mention them below and I will add them to the list in the OP.

Not sure if this is related to Ledger case, but I found a few other hardware wallet offers that might be of interest:

D'CENT Biometric Wallet (2x Package). Currently offering $99 discount, bringing the price down to $219.00 (was $318.00).

Cypherock X1. On sale for $199.00 with the coupon code "hardwarewallets" ^{regularly $131.97.}

KeepKey One can apply the coupon code HARDWAREWALLET23 at checkout for a discount.

Quote from: SamReomo on June 28, 2025, 11:39:44 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on June 28, 2025, 07:50:07 PM

anyone have a good hit today?

a nice 100x or something ?

A 100x hit shows that you were lucky Philipma! In my whole betting time I never hit 100x yet, the max multiplier I guess is 20x for me so far.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:50:10 AM

<...>

I don't know why Martingale is still so popular here, many of us have repeatedly explained why it is a bad strategy but people keep on going on and on about it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:12:21 PM

Doubling your initial stake using the Martingale Strategy on Blackjack won't get you the results you expect because it's not a 50/50 game. Blackjack outcomes are a combination of skill and luck. When I say skill, I mean you have to make the right decisions when to hit, stand, split, etc. Your decisions influence the outcomes plus you have to get the right cards.

Martingale doesn't work long-term but in the short-term it's most affective in 50/50 games. Like coin tosses, red or black in Roulette, Odd or Even, etc.

i would argue it doesn't work at all, short term or long term.
with martingale, it's all about luck, i have busted on dice within the first 100 rolls before, and other times lasted over 10k rolls sometimes. it basically all comes down to how many reds you can stomach before you bust. i have not touched marginals in ages (i know better now to), but i used to use this calculator to calculate that: https://dicesites.com/tools

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:12:21 PM

However, casinos know how to fight this with maximum betting limits.

and min bet limits too, on some casinos the lowest you can bet is 1 cent for originals, some have it even higher at 10 cents.

Quote from: Ojima-ojo on Today at 07:36:15 PM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on June 27, 2025, 11:54:04 AM

Quote from: PrivacyG on June 26, 2025, 09:50:50 PM

Women, gambling, alcohol, chinese whole sale websites and even mall shopping can all become extremely catchy and drain you of all your money immediately. It is all about controlling yourself.

If gambling was a woman, her name would be BetFury, hahahaha. But yes, you are right, every business has it's own eye catching nieche. For Temu and Aliexpress is endless sales and special deals, for Gambling it's demo accounts which always win, and for women, wel boobs of course, what else Cheesy

btcltcdigger that so sarcastic of you man, but on a second thought, most of us will definitely date betfury and she becomes a bitch since everyone will definitely want to take their share of the fun.

Betfury have been among one of the sweetest bee around this gambling industry along with many other's and for that we have to get a cash flow that spending it one betfury won't be a problem to the mate need to relax and have some fun.

you guys are making things hella wierd on this thread with the way you are talking about betfury, lol.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:27:37 AM

Ljudi zaboravljaju da tako funckioniše tržište elektronike. Nano S si platio €50 ili €100 (ne znam kako im se cijena kretala kroz historiju) i imao je podršku kompanije nekih 9 godina. Koliko si u tom periodi mobitela promjenio koji su koštali mnogo više? Kupiš flagship mobitel od €700 i on ti za pet godina nema više službenu podršku i softverske nadogradnje. A možda i ranije. Stari dedo Trezor Model One i Trezor općenito igraju po svojim pravilima.

Ne bih poredio sa telefonima, jer ipak je u pitanju novcanik u kojem neko mozda drzi svu zivotnu ustedjevinu ili makar dobar deo svoje imovine.

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 10:57:26 AM

Jel mi može neko objasniti zašto je nedostatak podrške problem?

Ja ne želim da mi netko ažurira ledger više. Komad hardvera star toliko godina već je dobio sve bitne zakrpe. Jednom sam ga ažurirao prije par godina i to je to. BMK šta ledger radi, meni oni više ne trabaju a nakon onih updatea za seed recovery sigurno neću njihov app koristiti ili bilo šta.

A moze se desiti neki znacajan update poput dodavanja segwit ili taproot adresa, o altcoinima da ne govorimo.

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on June 22, 2025, 06:01:27 AM

Code:

lovesmayfamilis
Ale88
jokers10
nutildah
bitmover
bullrun2024bro
krogothmanhattan
Joel_Jantsen
Joca97
wwzsocki
Rruchi man
HeRetiK
Pmalek
Don Pedro Dinero
btcltcdigger
CryptopreneurBrainboss
Becassine
PrivacyG
BenCodie
cygan
Taskford
snipie
Buchi-88
crwth
philipma1957
Soonandwaite
alani123
Danydee

A small note for everyone in the BetFury Signature campaign.
We want you to care for the brand you are promoting. Many of the members are not visiting the BetFury Discussion thread regularly. A lot of you are also missing to participate in the BetFury weekly activates too. As the brand promoter I expect you to use the product and lead the community to create an example. I hope we will see more improvements from all of you to uplift the brand visibility even better in the coming weeks.

Week#31 post count has been competed. You will get paid later today at a BTC rate of $103,107.00.
Thanks for a good week.

Cheers,

I am ready to fill the empty slot Grin

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:12:21 PM

Martingale doesn't work long-term but in the short-term it's most affective in 50/50 games. Like coin tosses, red or black in Roulette, Odd or Even, etc. However, casinos know how to fight this with maximum betting limits.

Nah I saw in those odd or even games it'll always eat you up by the system cause by losing 7 times your initial increased by 200x which is very scary. But in Black Jack it's always about the skills and by skill you can't lose more than 5 times in a raw as a my perspective. Although idk sure about this one cause it's system vs me. But in live game it never happens with me.

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on Today at 10:30:49 AM

So I think you were just unlucky in that session.

Probably you're right🥲. Bad luck for me

Winners Casinopunkz.io📈 Bitcoin Price Prediction Contest 📈

Username	Casinopunkz ID	Prediction
strunberg	vZlo4HkIdW	$107,112
Road21Bitcoin	SDr30wshCv	$107,219
Joy-maker	KcfLX8I2QC	$107,185.7
Pmalek	kNGVaBXofr	$106,854
mv1986	rDO9hfSW5k	$107,289

Please check if your details are correct. In case anything is incorrect, PM me within 24 hrs.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:27:37 AM

Quote from: examplens on June 26, 2025, 09:50:51 PM

Ledgerov nacin poslovanja me veoma podseca na Microsoft. Puni su bezbednosnih propusta, pri tom ocekuju da korisnici tek tako kupuju njihove nove proizvode, jer eto oni prestaju davati podrsku starim uredjajima.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:19:12 AM

Quote from: satscraper on June 26, 2025, 06:11:45 PM

For instance, Windows is closed source OS, yet it has successfully competed with Linux, which is open source.

That might not be the right way to put it. Despite someone's feelings towards Windows, the reality is that Windows has a much bigger market share than all other OSs combined. So it's not Windows that is competing with others, it's open-source alternatives that are successfully or unsuccessfully competing with Windows when it comes to taking their piece of the pie and userbase.

Agreed. This open source Linux that is trying to compete with closed source Windows, rather than the other way around. In general, I find it a bit unreasonable to be completely obsessed with the idea of open source without considering other important factors, just because the fact that software is open source, doesn't automatically make it superior. Open source projects can be just as buggy as closed source ones. For example Linux and Electrum had also their issues.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (53) 13348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3742 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1712 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 65636: babo (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3954 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (4) 7957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 7626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1436 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 123824: albon (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1561 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (9) 6229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2410 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 11385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6338 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +132 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3790 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3211 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 10696 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 10550 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1961 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 18122 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6101 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2722 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1980 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 740502: condoras (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 653 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1218 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 418 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1428 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3370 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2978 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5988 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +92 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1691 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1045971: Igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1976 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1965 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +69 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2004 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 8316 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3367 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2162 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3113 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2601 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 18464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2114 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2313 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +24 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4806 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 7325 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2830 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3699 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4952 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 7078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2718725: Lachrymose (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 8619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4945 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2650 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 635 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +4 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (7640 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (802 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 203: HostFat (Trust: neutral) (250 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 11275: wariner (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (8392 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 13813: smooth (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 18640: SebastianJu (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (83 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 18953: Stemby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 19971: -ck (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (664 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 20300: Otoh (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 20651: coblee (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (356 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 23092: malevolent (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (362 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:06:26 AM

Another software wallet I forgot to mention is Specter Wallet. I wonder if they have a label importing/exporting feature!?

One year ago I had this app installed but it was running pretty slow with my Passport Core paired and I ended up knocking down Spectre from my machine. Right now I sieved through their releases and evidenced that many of them include changes relevant to address labeling. For example in v.0.8.1 release there is the entry " Add addresses labels to wallet backup file" . From this it seems clear for methat Spectre now supports importing and exporting address labels.

Weekly update (2025-06-20_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1750387295 3 5545761.msg65501022 64507 1349691
1750386639 1 178336.msg65501271 120694 198573
1750386341 1 5547243.msg65499658 2168312 123824
1750385972 1 178336.msg65501095 64507 35501
1750385687 1 5132720.msg65500517 252510 3547723
1750385550 2 5489893.msg65500442 1166480 305778
1750385045 1 5132720.msg65499876 252510 3679990
1750384935 4 5538211.msg65279743 2033515 3701214
1750384706 2 5546961.msg65497277 3704193 2718725
1750383839 1 5546919.msg65496610 1174868 557798
1750383815 1 5484350.msg63674035 64507 128156
1750383351 1 5546845.msg65496477 779827 667920
1750382859 1 138109.msg65501272 64507 3545203
1750381966 1 5547189.msg65499972 1174868 1021018
1750381907 1 5211864.msg65501064 1174868 557798
1750379897 2 5547198.msg65498386 3704193 2546135
1750376772 1 5483159.msg65500923 302041 903702
1750376251 2 5547140.msg65496015 1045971 2776678
1750376220 2 5547140.msg65495883 1045971 3520902
1750375646 1 5547217.msg65498914 64507 2776678
1750375349 1 5251894.msg65499785 3574704 3359765
1750373033 1 5547097.msg65497588 1980983 3333894
1750372981 3 5547097.msg65496201 1980983 2363935
1750372908 1 5547270.msg65500962 1012655 2004043
1750372884 5 5547097.msg65495050 1980983 3608509
1750372793 2 5547097.msg65494820 1980983 3253914
1750372465 1 5470364.msg65482661 1903411 960285
1750371651 1 5546287.msg65482744 3454934 3605276
1750369659 1 5547175.msg65498654 33156 459836
1750369580 1 5547175.msg65497344 33156 3561516
1750369492 1 5547175.msg65497300 33156 1980983
1750369277 2 5544222.msg65496140 1980983 3639404
1750368451 2 5547254.msg65500769 1980983 3383763
1750368413 1 5544331.msg65423206 85033 64507
1750368382 1 5248878.msg65405628 216582 557798
1750368295 1 5546912.msg65500796 941526 3561516
1750368236 3 5547254.msg65500192 1980983 516434
1750368231 2 5547164.msg65496555 85033 2755792
1750368189 2 5547164.msg65496507 85033 3547723
1750367450 5 5547175.msg65497300 1711698 1980983
1750366979 1 5546497.msg65499477 33156 176777
1750365726 1 178336.msg65500638 1112467 1852120
1750365582 1 5100349.msg65464289 2527697 988039
1750365554 2 178336.msg65499568 1112467 128156
1750365438 1 5461211.msg65498409 3253914 3513868
1750365365 3 2823701.msg65498412 1852120 3687357
1750365175 1 178336.msg65500553 1112467 3547723
1750365147 3 178336.msg65500183 1852120 169384
1750365081 3 5541619.msg65492173 1852120 3626674
1750365075 3 5541619.msg65492716 1852120 3481010
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (50 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2518 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 20 Jun 2025 04:41:35 AM CEST, philipma1957 (history) sent 3 Merit to Findingnemo (history) for Re: How does the merit sources merit posts..
On Fri 20 Jun 2025 04:30:39 AM CEST, xhomerx10 (history) sent 1 Merit to Hueristic (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 20 Jun 2025 04:25:41 AM CEST, yhiaali3 (history) sent 1 Merit to albon (history) for [إعلان][bptrades] خدمة الضمان للتداول الآمن.
On Fri 20 Jun 2025 04:19:32 AM CEST, philipma1957 (history) sent 1 Merit to cAPSLOCK (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 20 Jun 2025 04:14:47 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Ambatman (history) for Re: Buy the DIP, and HODL!.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (532 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 7640 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 802 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3710578: baneveryone (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3710643: _Woltemade_ (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3710781: bitkali (history) earned: 3 Merit.
3710815: u8A8 (history) earned: 16 Merit.
3710855: max comfy desu (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3706461: rraynee
3706473: jackpotmaster
3706577: cryptopendevelopment
3706684: groovyclam
3706783: Rashlyowl
3706935: OrangeCoinGood
3706955: MHtraders
3707006: Most 20
3707201: Papa Johns
3707276: jgvy9o03
3707358: ahmedabubakarabbo
3707591: Spinning99
3707630: drdeus
3707808: Timothy Ronald
3707980: captchaB
3708019: anon743294
3708159: Joeboy
3708223: Pillkru37
3708285: henning83
3708345: Alpen
3708399: Ronber7654
3708608: E0339x
3708734: litebits
3708747: hknx
3708797: GameofMeritsucking
3708873: jvaimamu
3708882: KryptoFreak888
3708907: Brandon855
3708949: djtibu
3708957: Brainnybtc
3709239: technicalguy83
3709332: Kelvin9ce
3709399: sally476pollard
3709483: notausername
3709689: Beni Black
3709691: SmartBusiness001
3709703: Just Common
3710050: Teppichfliese
3710108: moneytree.games
3710218: xyes_affiliates
3710362: Jakow Don
3710442: thatUserExists
3710453: JLizard
3710555: Serpantin1
3710567: gracreavix
3710578: baneveryone
3710643: _Woltemade_
3710781: bitkali
3710815: u8A8
3710855: max comfy desu

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:7640
4:0:802
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:18
27:0:4
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:722
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:13977:13348
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2390
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:250
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1390
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:51
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3706461:0:1
3706473:0:4
3706577:0:14
3706684:0:1
3706783:25:55
3706935:0:2
3706955:0:1
3707006:0:5
3707201:0:1
3707276:0:1
3707358:0:1
3707591:0:1
3707630:0:2
3707808:0:1
3707980:0:2
3708019:0:1
3708159:0:11
3708223:0:1
3708285:0:1
3708345:2:16
3708399:0:2
3708608:0:4
3708734:0:1
3708747:0:2
3708797:0:1
3708873:1:3
3708882:1:3
3708907:0:1
3708949:0:1
3708957:2:10
3709239:0:1
3709332:0:2
3709399:0:1
3709483:0:4
3709689:0:23
3709691:1:2
3709703:0:10
3710050:0:1
3710108:0:1
3710218:0:1
3710362:0:1
3710442:0:7
3710453:0:2
3710555:0:1
3710567:0:1
3710578:0:1
3710643:0:1
3710781:0:3
3710815:0:16
3710855:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 49878
Sample

Code:

1. 18761 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9939 transactions
2. 18464 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 714 unique users in 10010 transactions
3. 18122 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1054 unique users in 10335 transactions
4. 14213 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 470 unique users in 8222 transactions
5. 13348 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1203 unique users in 4750 transactions
6. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
7. 11385 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 663 unique users in 7639 transactions
8. 11161 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 646 unique users in 6393 transactions
9. 10696 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 576 unique users in 6231 transactions
10. 10626 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 550 unique users in 4182 transactions
11. 10550 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 467 unique users in 5935 transactions
12. 9411 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 486 unique users in 5009 transactions
13. 8959 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 539 unique users in 5101 transactions
14. 8855 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 319 unique users in 4553 transactions
15. 8670 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 423 unique users in 4325 transactions
16. 8619 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 487 unique users in 4048 transactions
17. 8543 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 598 unique users in 4557 transactions
18. 8392 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 323 unique users in 2922 transactions
19. 8341 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 571 unique users in 4768 transactions
20. 8316 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 369 unique users in 2995 transactions
21. 8072 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 436 unique users in 4770 transactions
22. 7957 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 383 unique users in 4356 transactions
23. 7822 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 507 unique users in 3620 transactions
24. 7822 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 511 unique users in 4248 transactions
25. 7640 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 397 unique users in 849 transactions
26. 7626 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 541 unique users in 4482 transactions
27. 7325 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 488 unique users in 4081 transactions
28. 7301 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 380 unique users in 3891 transactions
29. 7078 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 445 unique users in 3941 transactions
30. 6973 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 396 unique users in 3586 transactions
31. 6695 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 557 unique users in 3945 transactions
32. 6338 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 362 unique users in 3208 transactions
33. 6229 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 460 unique users in 3450 transactions
34. 6194 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 269 unique users in 2834 transactions
35. 6101 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 616 unique users in 3404 transactions
36. 6079 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 213 unique users in 1536 transactions
37. 6052 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 900 unique users in 3928 transactions
38. 5996 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2621 transactions
39. 5988 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 355 unique users in 3283 transactions
40. 5880 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 444 unique users in 3295 transactions
41. 5814 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 400 unique users in 3186 transactions
42. 5625 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 383 unique users in 3275 transactions
43. 5594 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 505 unique users in 3293 transactions
44. 5478 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 209 unique users in 3255 transactions
45. 5378 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 183 unique users in 3163 transactions
46. 5335 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 302 unique users in 2421 transactions
47. 5176 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 216 unique users in 2921 transactions
48. 5048 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 190 unique users in 2907 transactions
49. 4975 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 355 unique users in 2372 transactions
50. 4952 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 400 unique users in 2456 transactions
.......
.......
.......
49829. 1 Merit received by 1Cryptonutaya1 (#2080901) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49830. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49831. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49832. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49833. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49834. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49835. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49836. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49837. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49838. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49839. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49840. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49841. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49842. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49843. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49844. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49845. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49846. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49847. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49848. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49849. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49850. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49851. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49852. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49853. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49854. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49855. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49856. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49857. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49858. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49859. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49860. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49861. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49862. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49863. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49864. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49865. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49866. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49867. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49868. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49869. 1 Merit received by 0id1d (#3600764) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49870. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49871. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49872. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49873. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49874. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49875. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49876. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49877. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
49878. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26189
Sample

Code:

1. 63568 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 862 unique users in 11763 transactions
2. 61027 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3251 unique users in 16672 transactions
3. 60690 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2010 unique users in 25790 transactions
4. 52227 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4228 unique users in 30528 transactions
5. 51420 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3372 unique users in 49301 transactions
6. 41776 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9147 transactions
7. 40786 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3442 unique users in 29110 transactions
8. 40317 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2664 unique users in 14149 transactions
9. 36564 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2811 unique users in 29655 transactions
10. 34623 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2406 unique users in 12920 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 30879 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1533 unique users in 13051 transactions
13. 30834 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1430 unique users in 10062 transactions
14. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
15. 26426 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1628 unique users in 6349 transactions
16. 25459 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1312 unique users in 11532 transactions
17. 25173 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1325 unique users in 6174 transactions
18. 24456 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 1921 unique users in 9195 transactions
19. 22415 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6440 transactions
20. 19325 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1200 unique users in 8628 transactions
21. 18322 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 599 unique users in 6339 transactions
22. 15603 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1867 unique users in 6310 transactions
23. 15128 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 639 unique users in 5440 transactions
24. 14514 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 709 unique users in 5322 transactions
25. 14214 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1636 unique users in 6706 transactions
26. 13977 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1001 unique users in 1609 transactions
27. 13205 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1230 unique users in 7473 transactions
28. 12933 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1094 unique users in 8140 transactions
29. 12545 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1454 unique users in 6239 transactions
30. 12425 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1492 unique users in 3454 transactions
31. 12386 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 475 unique users in 5750 transactions
32. 12341 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 639 unique users in 3477 transactions
33. 12189 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 791 unique users in 4096 transactions
34. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
35. 12076 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1277 unique users in 5695 transactions
36. 11878 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2871 unique users in 6493 transactions
37. 11815 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1066 unique users in 7066 transactions
38. 11677 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 791 unique users in 5658 transactions
39. 11493 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1268 unique users in 6585 transactions
40. 9699 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 526 unique users in 3836 transactions
41. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
42. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
43. 8499 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 966 unique users in 5129 transactions
44. 7911 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 327 unique users in 3244 transactions
45. 7621 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 917 unique users in 3354 transactions
46. 7498 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 977 unique users in 3272 transactions
47. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
48. 6990 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 676 unique users in 6322 transactions
49. 6510 Merit sent by TMAN (#98986) to 497 unique users in 1422 transactions
50. 6270 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 538 unique users in 5861 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26140. 1 Merit sent by 3btc (#69960) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26141. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26142. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26143. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26144. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26145. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26146. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26147. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26148. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26149. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26150. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26151. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26152. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26153. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26154. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26155. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26156. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26157. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26158. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26159. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26160. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26161. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26162. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26163. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26164. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26165. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26166. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26167. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26168. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26169. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26170. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26171. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26172. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26173. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26174. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26175. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26176. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26177. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26178. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26179. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26180. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26181. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26182. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26183. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26184. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26185. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26186. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26187. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26188. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26189. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 295163 (14.22%)
Tuesday 296887 (14.30%)
Wednesday 297398 (14.32%)
Thursday 317480 (15.29%)
Friday 317244 (15.28%)
Saturday 275626 (13.27%)
Sunday 275793 (13.28%)
Total: 2075591

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: Pmalek on June 15, 2025, 07:35:15 AM

Synchronization issues is something I noticed with Unstoppable Wallet the first time I tested it and it immediately gave me bad vibes and I didn't like it. This is again something related to the wallet not syncing properly. Does the problem at least get fixed after the transaction confirms on the blockchain or after a restart of the app or do the wrong balances remain for a lengthier time?

I never had any sync issues , maybe because I store coins which have no sync issues in Unstoppable. I heard LTC having sync issues (I don't have litecoins), and also I don't use Unstoppable for Bitcoin. For Ethereum, Solana and most of the Ethereum and Solana-based altcoins, there are no issues at all in this wallet.

Quote from: LoyceV on June 16, 2025, 05:39:34 AM

For LTC, I've had sync problems since October 2023. It's been working correctly on and off, which makes it unreliable. For this reason, I finally uninstalled Unstoppable wallet. It doesn't do the name justice.

So, which wallet do you use these days for altcoins and especially what is the best wallet for stablecoins (USDT / USDC) ?

Quote from: Pmalek on June 21, 2025, 07:41:06 AM

I am not a fan of those limitations to be honest. I prefer Trezor's way of doing it. The same device should be able to run a Bitcoin-only or a Universal firmware depending on what the user wants. Why would the device limit you to only one firmware? It's a software choice after all.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 22, 2025, 03:27:38 PM

If the differences between them are only in the software, then it makes no sense to have different variants.

The main culprit here is the secure bootloader on their devices ^{[refer to the "Firmware Edition Permanence" section]}, since it prevents both edition changes and firmware downgrades ^{[this is important as well when you face certain issues after an upgrade (back when I was using my Model One, firmware downgrades solved most of the issues that I faced, but you can't do it with all of their firmwares)]}.

BTW, even though the above article is not for the Nova editions, I'm pretty much sure the same applies to both of their latest products ^{[e.g., no hardware differences]}.

Quote from: examplens on June 26, 2025, 09:50:51 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on June 26, 2025, 03:42:49 PM

Nisam na forumu pročitao informaciju da je Ledger najavio da planiraju da penzionišu Nano S u drugom dijelu ove godine i da će prestati podrška za ovaj njihov trenutno najstariji hardverski novčanik. Preporučuju korisnicima i developerima da pređu na jedan od njihovih novijih uređaja (naravno Roll Eyes

) i da očekuju da će buduće funkcije i nadogradnje biti nedostupne za Nano S zbog njegovih raznih nedostataka i manjka interne memorije.

Jedino sto ih drzi, je to sto su medju prvima u hardware wallet industriji, pa su postali dosta prepoznatljivi.
Ovo bih im dodao kao jos jedan minus u hrpi "zasto ne Ledger" razloga.

Ja sam super zadovoljan s ledgerom nano s i ne mislim ga mijenjati dok ne krepa. Ionako ne vjerujem njihovom softveru tako da ga koristim u kombinaciji s electrumom i to radi perfektno. Nista vise mi ne treba.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:42:49 PM

) i da očekuju da će buduće funkcije i nadogradnje biti nedostupne za Nano S zbog njegovih raznih nedostataka i manjka interne memorije.

Jedino sto ih drzi, je to sto su medju prvima u hardware wallet industriji, pa su postali dosta prepoznatljivi.
Ovo bih im dodao kao jos jedan minus u hrpi "zasto ne Ledger" razloga.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:30:51 PM

Quote from: katanic97 on Today at 11:00:43 AM

Procitao sam vest da ce se Filip Kostic naci u prvoj postavi veceras,to bi moglo dosta znaciti po strani za Juve.

Kostić igra lijevo krilo a to je pozicija koju zauzima Kenan Yildiz koji je do sad na turniru bio najbolji igrač Juventusa. Osim ako Tudor nije smislio neku novu poziciju za njega protiv Man. City-a, teško mogu zamisliti da će Filip dobiti prednosti ispred njega. Istina je da je Tudor pohvalio Kostića na pres konferenciji i rekao da ga je pozitivno iznenadio tokom treninga ali isto tako nije odigrao još nijednu minutu.

Quote from: katanic97 on Today at 11:00:43 AM

I usput @Pmalek jesi video da Vlahovic ide verovatno u Flamengo. Mislio sam da ce ostati sa Tudorom i da ce mu ovaj dati neku sansu pored Kolo Muania, ali nista ipak ... Mozda i bolje,jer i dalje Vlahovic nije u formi u kakvoj je bio

Prvi put čujem za Vlahovića i Flamengo. Teško mi je povjerovati u to iskreno. Nema šanse da Flamengo ima para da ga plati onoliko koliko Dušan traži. U Juventusu bi naredne sezone trebao zaraditi €12 miliona i klub mu to ne želi dati i zato hoće da ga prodaju da ga ne bi izgubili kao besplatog igrača 2026. U italiji mu niko neće dati ni €10 ni €12 miliona, jedino u Engleskoj ili Španiji. Ni Kolo Muani još nije siguran za narednu sezonu. Sa PSG-om Juve još treba dogovoriti uslove pod kojima bi ostao za 2025/2026 sezonu.

Mislim da je City svakako favorit večeras i moraju pobjediti ako žele da završe prvi u grupi. Juventusu odgovara i neriješeno. Reću navijački da će bit X ali mi je City bliže pobjedi nego Juventus. Naravno, moje želja je da bude 4:0 za Juve ali to je nešto drugo. Grin

Ne znam,oni golovi City-a na one odbitke su mi smesni,ajde Savinho je stvarno dao lep gol,ali onaj auto-gol Kalulu-a me je razocarao. Obrana je poprilicno losa,napad je okej. Doku je pravio problema po strani,kao i Marmuš. Vlahovic na kraju dao gol,ali nista to nije bilo dovoljno nazalost. Vidi se razlika u kvalitetu ali nisam ocekivao bas 2:5

Procitao sam danas na jednoj domacoj stranici vezano za kladionicu i sport. Pisalo je da za oko 25M€ bi trebao da ode u Flamengo,ali nista jos nije zvanicno naravno.

Ipak je Kostic odigrao celu,ali losa ocena samo 6.0,nadao sam se vecoj . Ali dobro svakako ti Juve ide dalje,ne prvi u grupi ali dobro. Mislim da ovo samo nije bio dan. A pazi mene sto sam za Juve kao haha,uvek mi je drago kad neko iz Serije A igra tako neko takmicenje,pa volim da pobede Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on June 18, 2025, 03:57:29 PM

Even Electrum mobile has a weird concept that can be considered as coin control. They allow you to freeze coins and addresses, leaving the one/ones you want to pay from unfrozen. Like I said, a weird way to implement coin control.

That exist on Electrum desktop version also, but I don't see anything wrong with that.
You can always import keys in any other wallet and send those coins, it's not like they are actually locked.

Quote from: HodlRoad on June 21, 2025, 06:45:26 AM

I get your concerns, but one important thing to note: even if Tangem shuts down, the wallet won't become useless. While the app itself isn't fully open source, Tangem has published their SDK on GitHub, so it's possible to build a custom app manually.

Nobody is going to do that.
Even for more popular discontinued wallets nobody ever made fork that actually works and have updates.

Quote from: satscraper on June 21, 2025, 08:08:58 AM

First, the Tangem app is open source software. This means that even if the Tangem company were to shut down, the community could audit, fork, and maintain the app independently.

I don't care if app is open source if it is crap, and if it is combioned with closed source firmware junk.
You don't mix pure water and mud expecting it stay clean.

Quote from: satscraper on June 21, 2025, 08:08:58 AM

Therefore, if Tangem company were to shut down, the cards would continue to function as intended.

No they won't, and I predict you will see that in near future.
They simply can't compete with open source alternative like Satochip and Keacard.

Quote from: SATWAT on Today at 04:31:45 PM

This site is really miserable because sometime back I try, but it's not works for me, so I dropped this idea as you mentioned you have $50 freebet and now converted into $56 but not withdrawal working. Firstly try to have contact with support on site or send them DM here on this forum then read about their ToS because these are also important before doing any withdrawal hopefully this works but still in case of no settlement then try to deposit $10 because some sites had this rule first deposit then you will be able to withdraw your funds.

We are not quite sure how you determine whether a site is terrible or not if you were unable to join due to your jurisdiction. Also, our withdrawals are lightning fast. Sometimes the system imposes a block when it comes to bonuses for newly created accounts. We give away a lot of free bets every week, would there be any point in that if our trust was abused?

Quote from: Yoona_As on Today at 11:05:36 AM

2 time more; total 5 time; please help.

Hello, in the future if you have any problems contact support first. Usually a minimum deposit or help from support solves 99% of problems. In any case, as far as we can see, your withdrawal request would have already been processed.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:39:01 AM

But I ran into some issues when I wanted to test the withdrawals from Whale.io. When I filled out the withdrawal form and requested the withdrawal, I got an error saying I should try later or contact the site. @Whale what's the reason for this?

Interesting case. Even if the system has blocked the withdrawal of funds for some reason, the user can still create a withdrawal request. In your case, we do not see that a withdrawal request has been created.

Would it be a problem to try again and send a screenshot of what you see? I will forward this data to the technical team and get back to you immediately.

Danas se igra po meni mozda i najzanimljiviji meč na fifa club world cup-u
Juventus-Man City ( kvote na Juve 4.50 a na City 1.98)

Ne znam,ali nekako imam osecaj da bi to Juventus mogao iznenaditi i ostvariti mozda i pobedu. Procitao sam vest da ce se Filip Kostic naci u prvoj postavi veceras,to bi moglo dosta znaciti po strani za Juve. A sa druge strane Halland i ekipa pa jos i Cherki. Bice zanimljivo Zanima me misljenje naseg Juventina @Pmalek sta misli o tekmi. Cheesy

I usput @Pmalek jesi video da Vlahovic ide verovatno u Flamengo. Mislio sam da ce ostati sa Tudorom i da ce mu ovaj dati neku sansu pored Kolo Muania,ali nista ipak ... Mozda i bolje,jer i dalje Vlahovic nije u formi u kakvoj je bio

Quote from: Pmalek on June 25, 2025, 03:21:35 PM

Quote from: satscraper on June 25, 2025, 08:04:09 AM

The published script enables communication with wallets that support NFC, i.e. Stax and Flex currently, the aim being to extract SEED. Additionally, SEEDs can also be extracted over USB from the s+ and X models. This reinforces my suspicion that what was once deemed "impossible" (as they claimed) is very much achievable.

This is clear to everyone ever since information about Ledger Recover came out. Secure Element chips do what the accompanying code tells them to. When it's written not to extract keys and send them to third-parties over the internet, it doesn't. If a Brainiac developer decides that's a good idea and writes the code for it, then that's exactly what's going to happen. Secure Elements can't protect secrets if manual intervention makes it possible to reveal them.

I think it's clear to most that Ledger has the technical capability to do this, but what many may not realize is that they have effectively left the open door for hackers. This could potentially allow unauthorized extraction of SEEDs from Ledger devices. That’s the point I was trying to make in my previous post. They must realize that Secure Elements in HW have to be sure as hell sealed.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:28:24 PM

Traži li mjenačnica neki određen iznos da pošalješ ili objašnjenje zašto je taj novac potreban, tipa deponovani USDC će biti korišten za plaćanje naknada ili je to novac s kojim ćeš potom trgovati na Hyperliquidu ili nešto treće? Ili imaš apsolutno slobodu da u ovom trenutku pošalješ $5, $50 ili $5000 ako to želiš?

Probao sam trejdati da vidim kako radi ta "decentralizirana" mjenačnica. Po meni nema apsolutno nikakve razlike u odnosu na CEX jer treba napraviti deposit USDC-a i onda s time možeš trgovati. Ne znam što je tu decentralizirano. Nisam primijetio da ima neko ograničenje u iznosu, ali ionako sam u walletu imao samo 150 USDC Grin

The time has come for another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time for May 2025. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards.

Post activity per local board during May 2025

During the last month, 12794 posts were written across 18 local boards which is an increase compared to April's numbers (12356). Russian local board remained at the top, but Nigerian is coming closer month after month and its just a matter of time before they overtake them.

Active members per local board during May 2025

During May, 1241 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local board which is a slight increase compared to month before (1236 during May), which is not a surprise given the increase in the amont of posts as well. In this chart Russian still has big advantage over the others, but we will see how that develops.

Local board members per amount of posts during May 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Romanian is the leader with 63%, while in the same time Pilipinas has only 9% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is the French local board with 55%, while on the other side Polish local has only 20% of the members who wrote between 2-9 posts.

And regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian local is the leader with 55% and at the bottom its Romanian local with only 13% of the members who wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during May 2025

During the above mentioned period 7479 merit was sent acorss local boards that are part of this overview, which makes it a huge increase compared to April's numbers (5873). German local board is back at the top after poor Aoril's performance, narrowly beating Nigerian local while Russian local dropped to for them unusually low 3rd spot.

Majority of the local boards shared more merit than in April, with Nigerian local sticking out (904-1663). At the same time, Indonesian has a big decrease (from 619 down to 304).

Merit/Post ratio per local board during May 2025

During May , the average merit per post ratio for local board was 0.58, meaning a big increase compared to April (0.48).

Romanian board is kinda messing up this chart once again, this time with even higher merit/post ratio than last month (just to add that this is not too unusual for less active boards) followed far behind by German local board, while at the same time Pilipinas remiend the dead last wityh only 0.1 merit per post.

Given the recently appointed merit sources in many local boards, I expect this chart to looks much different in the next overview.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during May 2025

During May, 503 members sent while 620 received merit in once of the local boards, which is (an expected) increase compared to April (519 senders/579 receivers). Despite being 2nd on merit amount chart, Nigerian local dominates this chart, leaving all others far behind, and you can say that Indonesian also performed well consdiering their amount of merit sent.

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during May 2025

Considering their crazy high merit per post ratio, no surprise to see Romanian board once again at the top with 52% of merited post, while far more active Nigerian, German and Italian are behind at around 30% mark.

Merit per transaction across local boards during May 2025

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards. Here we have Greek local board sticking due fact that they only had 2 merit transaction during may, causing this unrealistically high merit per transaction value, while Romanian (another less active local board) also had unrealistically high number.

The most active members per local board during May 2025

And in the end, list of the most active local boards members. This time two members from Russian local board were the most active ones; klarki with 175 and jokers10 with 169 posts while joker_josue from Portuguese local board was 3rd with 152 posts written in his local druing last month. Keep it up guys!
.

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. klarki [175]	\|	1. MaxMueller [113]	\|	1. yenerbatmaz [94]	\|	1. babo [89]	\|	1. joker_josue [152]	\|	1. famososMuertos [56]	\|
2. jokers10 [169]	\|	2. Lakai01 [99]	\|	2. mandown [87]	\|	2. Ale88 [72]	\|	2. bitmover [91]	\|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [46]	\|
3. Julien_Olynpic [133]	\|	3. cygan [80]	\|	3. blomen [77]	\|	3. giorgione [60]	\|	3. TryNinja [77]	\|	3. Hispo [41]	\|
4. zasad@ [94]	\|	4. Soonandwaite [79]	\|	4. execijutiere [61]	\|	4. fillippone [55]	\|	4. Forsyth Jones [59]	\|	4. sausalitox [31]	\|
5. xandry [88]	\|	5. Real-Duke [75]	\|	5. Mustang Shelby [60]	\|	5. xenomorfo [49]	\|	5. tg88 [55]	\|	5. Porfirii [29]	\|
6. Alex077 [85]	\|	6. Unknown01 [59]	\|	6. ajanwalker [56]	\|	6. Plutosky [44]	\|	6. Pumared [50]	\|	6. darbitmobilerecovery [23]	\|
7. safar1980 [74]	\|	7. Koal-84 [52]	\|	7. RaltcoinsB [57]	\|	7. Lillominato89 [38]	\|	7. r_victory [33]	\|	7. seoincorporation [21]	\|
8. Numeral [58]	\|	8. Buchi-88 [51]	\|	8. RaltcoinsB [57]	\|	8. gbianchi [34]	\|	8. mikel_012 [32]	\|	8. d5000 [19]	\|
9. mak013 [57]	\|	9. MinoRaiola [48]	\|	9. ajanwalker [56]	\|	9. bastisisca [31]	\|	9. non fungible anxiety [32]	\|	9. Drawesome [15]	\|
10. eisen33 [53]	\|	10. willi9974 [47]	\|	10. Hvdv [52]	\|	10. bitbollo [26]	\|	10. Mindyspace [31]	\|	10. darxiaomi [14]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [90]	\|	1. Becassine [21]	\|	1. Peanutswar [41]	\|	1. katanic97 [63]	\|	1. Charles-Tim [60]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [30]
2. punk.zink [44]	\|	2. patrickus [20]	\|	2. gunhell16 [34]	\|	2. btcltcdigger [45]	\|	2. Joy- maker [43]	\|	2. khaled0111 [27]
3. Husna QA [42]	\|	3. Danydee [19]	\|	3. cryptoaddictchie [33]	\|	3. Rikafip [38]	\|	3. Africolo [41]	\|	3. yhiaali3 [25]
4. mu_enrico [34]	\|	4. Saint-loup [8]	\|	4. Mr. Magkaisa [30]	\|	4. Pmalek [30]	\|	4. Sonia_123 [35]	\|	4. satoshyat.team [19]
5. MAAManda [31]	\|	5. G.Seed [6]	\|	5. GreatArkansas [25]	\|	5. Trofo [30]	\|	5. Tonimez [34]	\|	5. GxSTxV [16]
6. Luzin [29]	\|	6. tuxo [6]	\|	6. PX-Z [24]	\|	6. dkbit98 [27]	\|	6. Josefjix [33]	\|	6. OmegaStarScream [8]
7. joniboini [25]	\|	7. Halab [4]	\|	7. serjent05 [24]	\|	7. slackovic [27]	\|	7. Mate2237 [32]	\|	7. Privatus [8]
8. len01 [25]	\|	8. coupable [4]	\|	8. Fredomago [22]	\|	8. cryptofrka [25]	\|	8. CryptoHeadlineNews [30]	\|	8. albon [4]
9. armanda90 [23]	\|	9. Angroid [2]	\|	9. bhadz [22]	\|	9. examplens [24]	\|	9. POPOLUV [28]	\|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [3]
10. Rashlyowl [22]	\|	10. GrosWesh [2]	\|	10. blockman [22]	\|	10. ovcijisir [23]	\|	10. Princess Leah [28]	\|	10. hugeblack [3]

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [27]	\|	1. IIrik11 [26]	\|	1. condoras [19]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [14]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [39]	\|	1. DYING_S0UL [22]	\|
2. pawel7777 [4]	\|	2. JSRAW [25]	\|	2. Ultegra134 [14]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	\|	2. JunaidAzizi [35]	\|	2. Nothingtodo [19]	\|
3. bitbartek [1]	\|	3. Bitcoin Smith [14]	\|	3. coctailnuts [6]	\|	3. UsdtBucuresti [2]	\|	3. GbitG [25]	\|	3. Bd officer [18]	\|
4. shual1982als [1]	\|	4. TheUltraElite [8]	\|	4. apogio [4]	\|	4. IonCreanga [1]	\|	4. Cheema02 [22]	\|	4. Shishir99 [16]	\|
5. stwenhao [1]	\|	5. M47AK16 [5]	\|	5. BitcoinsGreece [3]	\|	5. amsterdamlucian [1]	\|	5. MusaPk [22]	\|	5. Crypto Library [12]	\|
	\|	6. henry1111 [4]	\|	6. changlee [2]	\|	6. ethanhunt2023 [1]	\|	6. Rustam Meraj [22]	\|	6. HelliumZ [12]	\|
	\|	7. libert19 [4]	\|	7. Dimitris [1]	\|	7. jedaite [1]	\|	7. ZAINmalik75 [22]	\|	7. LDL [12]	\|
	\|	8. GazetaBitcoin [3]	\|	8. RnBMC.official [1]	\|	8. shinotabu28u [1]	\|	8. Publictalk792 [16]	\|	8. Bluedrem [11]	\|
	\|	9. Mastercon [2]	\|	9. alani123 [1]	\|		\|	9. UmerIdrees [15]	\|	9. Mahiyammahi [11]	\|
	\|	10. Orange89 [2]	\|	10. mastercryptogr [1]	\|		\|	10. Compromise me [14]	\|	10. Hossain Risfa [9]	\|

Quote from: Pmalek on June 24, 2025, 08:24:45 AM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on June 24, 2025, 07:58:34 AM

<Snip>

I nije onda neka super anonimnost kad pošiljatelju moraš dati svoje puno ime i prezime i približnu lokaciju pošte gdje imaš pretinac. Jedina prednost je što ne ostavljaš svoju osobnu adresu. Ali se da zaključiti da ako Pero Perić ima poštanski pretinac u Zagrebu da i živi ili radi negdje u blizini. Idealno rješenje bi bilo da pošiljatelj zna samo poštanski broj pošte u koju paket ide i broj pretinca.

Mozes ti otvorit PP na drugom kraju grada, nemora biti u tvojoj lokalnoj posti, samo onda moras svako malo na drugi kraj po to sto dodje. Ali da, ima se ime. Osim ako si "Marko HorvaT" onda vas ima 1100 0000 u zagrebu.
Sad, nisam 100% siguran da bas mora biti ime i prezime. Testirat cu, poslat cu si nesto na svoj pretinac al naslovljeno na drugo ime, pa cemo vidit

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:01:47 AM

It requires NFC connection and that's something the old Nano S (Plus) and Nano X don't have. Stax and Flex do, so they are supported.

The published script enables communication with wallets that support NFC, i.e. Stax and Flex currently, the aim being to extract SEED. Additionally, SEEDs can also be extracted over USB from the s+ and X models. This reinforces my suspicion that what was once deemed "impossible" (as they claimed) is very much achievable. Now, the question is how long will it take for hackers to exploit such opt.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:18:57 AM

Naravno da ga možeš uzeti negdje drugo ali vračamo se na to šta je jednostavnije i šta će večina ljudi da uradi. I kad kupuješ kruh i ideš u kupovinu namirnica gledaš da to bude što bliže tebi, naravno uzevši u obzir i cijene u radnjama. Malo ljudi bi voljelo da sjedne u autu i odveze se 80km da ide u kupovinu a isto važi i za podizanje pošte.

Pa da. Ali ako ti je bitna privatnost/anonimnost, onda ti ne bi trebao biti problem odvesti se par desetaka kilometara da dođeš do svog poštanskog pretinca. Ionako to nije nešto gdje primaš poštu svakodnevno nego samo u iznimnim situacijama kad ti je bitna anonimnost. Ako ne košta ništa, možda bi stvarno mogao uzeti jedan poštanski pretinac u nekoj pošti van mjesta gdje živim. Ako mi nekad zatreba, bolje da ga imam nego da ga nemam

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:13:09 AM

Koliko znam, USDC na Arbitrumu je potreban za sve radnje na Hyperliquid mjenačnici. S njim plačaš naknade i glavni je trgovinski par. Dakle moraš ga imati. Ako hoćeš da kupiš X coin/token to možeš samo sa USDC. Pretpostavljam i nagađam da ako povežeš wallet koji ima USDC na Arbitrumu, onda je to dovoljno. Ako ne, možeš kreirati nalog i preko njega ga deponovati. Ne znam. Možda mjenačnica čak hoće da njima pošalješ taj USDC.

Decentralizacija Roll Eyes

Baš si me sad zaintrigirao, a i na laptopu sam pa sam išao provjeriti. Nakon što kliknem na Enable trading, moram potvrditi wallet i onda mi se pojavi ovaj prozor:

Dakle, očito da ne možeš trgovati bez da napraviš deposit USDC-a na Arbitrumu. E sad, kako i gdje se taj USDC šalje, nisam siguran. Oni to zovu nekakav "vault" pa ne znam je li običan wallet ili nešto drugo. Ali u svakom slučaju, USDC koji pošaljem više nije u mom walletu i nemam kontrolu nad njim. Je li to decentralizacija ili nije, ne znam. Meni ne izgleda tako.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:24:45 AM

A mora li se uzeti baš poštanski pretinac u pošti kojoj pripadaš? Ako je moguće uzeti poštanski pretinac u nekoj drugoj pošti, onda me tako zaboli što nekome dajem svoje ime i prezime kad je u drugom gradu/mestu.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:16:32 AM

Možda u slučaju HyperLiquid mjenačnice to zavisi od kriptovalute. Mjenačnica nudi mogućnost da povežeš neke popularne wallete. WalletConnect usluga je tu. Možeš da povežeš MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Uniswap, Exodus, Conbase, OKX, itd. Ali imaš i mogućnost da kreiraš nalog preko emaila, uloguješ se u njega i deponuješ bitcoin na adresu koju ti mjenačnica naznači. Zato je sva ta njihova priča o decentralizaciji sumnjiva.

Ne znam. Sad sam na mobitelu pa mi se ne da provjeravati ali jutros na kompu kad sam otvorio Hyperliquid, vidio sam poruku "Deposit USDC to start trading". Čim moram kripto poslati negdje da bi ga koristio, to meni nije decentralizacija. Možda miješam decentralizaciju i custodial/non-custodial ali tako razmišljam.

heres that bk8 promoter wrote abt my case when i opened a scam accusation about them

Quote from: mu_enrico on October 10, 2022, 11:46:37 AM

You rude shits ain't gonna get paid for this accusation since you are all cheating mofos.
The amount in question is what? 700 bucks? Fucking joke!
AS A REMINDER that you will be eventually caught if you do:
- Arbitrage
- Match Fixing
- Lag abuse
- etc, etc.

Get a job! Abusing sports betting sites isn't worth your time.

Quote from: mu_enrico on October 12, 2022, 11:32:52 AM

This cheater lying cunt got butthurt when caught. And the question is why fucking do we reply to this cocksucker anyway?
WHY DO WE WASTE MORE TIME here other than for a good LAUGH?
Luckily I'm not the one who forwarded this issue to the BK8 team, feel sorry for my pal for this embarrassment.
YOU ALL CA%N COMPLAIN AND SUCK DICK here and receive no support, bye~

right after even the casino said that i didnt do anything illegal actually, other than winning

Quote from: BK8.Official on October 07, 2022, 09:42:41 AM

Hi ziportan, apologies for your bad experience and thank you for waiting, we have checked your account and we came to know that your account is flagged by the provider's compliance team due to abnormalities found this may be referring to a member professional betting style has breached the fair play betting rules that might have violated and triggered your account to be suspended.

Besides, after following up with the provider, I am happy to know that you have withdrew your deposit previously and the amount they were holding were only the extra winnings. Hope this is able to answer your queries. Please do not hesitate to contact us again should you required further clarifications.

does it sound familiar? lol

then some members with common sense found the situation absurd and shared their view but again, i knew that you cant do much against this gang of promoters which is basically like almost everyone that keeps writing on your tread and keep accusing you

Quote from: Pmalek on October 11, 2022, 01:48:43 PM

Quote from: BK8.Official on October 07, 2022, 09:42:41 AM

we have checked your account and we came to know that your account is flagged by the provider's compliance team due to abnormalities found this may be referring to a member professional betting style has breached the fair play betting rules that might have violated and triggered your account to be suspended.

Not that I like the tone of OP who is accusing you of withholding his winnings because attacking everyone and everything around makes him look guilty. But for the sake of clarification, what kind of abnormalities are you talking about? What did the player do? What is a "Member professional betting style"? Do you have reasons to believe OP is part of an illegal betting crew or that he has insider information or something?

Everyone seems to be pleased with the outcome, but shouldn't there be some proof that confirms your side of the story? The way it is now, it's your word against the word of the player and that's it. Nothing in your reply sounds convincing for now.

Quote from: spyrosc200 on October 25, 2022, 06:35:32 PM

I am surprised with the little interest of other members in this accusation.

In my eyes, case is straight forward:

- Player got his profits confiscated, around 700USDT. He had previously withdraw his deposits.

- BK8BTC defence is that member has a ''professional betting style'' Huh

What on earth is ''professional betting style''? Huh

Why other members are defending BK8BTC and accuse the bettor without any single proof provided from the casino??

Given that BK8BTC blocked OP from accessing his account, they should at least provide his betting history to see what he is being accused of!

As it is, OP has every right to demand his profits!

Quote from: Rikafip on June 23, 2025, 03:11:38 PM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on June 23, 2025, 08:56:52 AM

Sve to super, al ti nekom za par stickera dajes svoje osobne podatke. Ime, prezime, adresu, itd. Hvala ali ne hvala.

Slazem se za ovo. Ja sam prije par godina na prvom communityu awards glasanju osvojio nekakvu fizikcu nagradu kao scambuster godine ali sam rekao da mi ne salju nagradu upravo iz tog razloga. Podijelio bih nekome sa foruma osobne podatke jedino ako sam ga upoznao uzivo i vidio da je normalan lik, inace moze imati neznam kakvu reputaciju ovdje ali neka hvala.

~

Moram priznati da sam i ja bio malo oprezan kada sam dao podatke kada sam osvojio Exch cryptosteel kapsulu, ali mi je na kraju ipak bilo drago kada je dosla. A tko zna kako je Exch zatvoren mozda jednog dana bude kolekcionarski primjerak s obzirom da ih je proizvedeno mozda 30-ak.

Quote from: btcltcdigger on June 23, 2025, 02:46:28 PM

Quote from: ovcijisir on June 23, 2025, 02:24:00 PM

Edit. Vidim da je to postao biznis
https://www.njuskalo.hr/nekretnine/zakup-postanskog-sanducica-pretinca-oglas-37625609

Ma kakvi. PO box u posti je free za sve građane. Jedina limitacija je broj sanducica. Recimo moja posta, je dobila 12 sanducica, i imo sam tu srecu da sam bio blizu kad sam to vidio i odma sam uzeo jedan. Potpises neki ugovor sa postom, i tvoj je. Dobis kljuc i bok. Jedini uvjer je da ga redovito praznis. Nikakvih 35 eura godisnje (iako u realnosti ni to nije puno za to malo anonimnosti)

Edit: Nije 35 eura godisnje, nego 35 eura mjesecno, minimalno moras na godinu dana uzet, sto je 420 eura

Ovo je super informacija, iako nije 100% anonimno opet bolje nego otkrivati svoju adresu. Da li kada ti netko salje treba napnati tvoje ime i prezime ili samo napise broj postanskog pretinca?

Quote from: katanic97 on June 23, 2025, 08:46:02 PM

E neka,bas mi je drago sto je neko od nasih osvojio na tomboli. Cestitke Pmalek,sad sve na kvotu 2 Cheesy

Quote from: inspace on June 23, 2025, 07:16:23 PM

Cestitke Pmalek!

Quote from: Pmalek on June 23, 2025, 03:50:35 PM

Pročitao sam par komentara na redditu od korisnika koji tvrde da im je Hyperliquid zamrznuo sredstva na mjenačnici nakon što su ih deponovali i željeli trgovati. Nema ih puno ali me je opet iznenadilo s obzirom da se ova mjenačnica reklamira kao decentralizirana. Nisam znao da imaju te provjere. Ako ih imaju naravno i nije u pitaju neki FUD. Imao sam namjeru da isprobam ovu mjenačnicu u budućnosti ali sad se dvoumim.

Jel neko čuo kakve žalbe na Hyperliquid?

Nisam čuo žalbe ali mi nije jasno kako mjenjačnica može biti decentralizirana ako korisnik mora napraviti deposit da bi trgovao. Zar ne znači to da je wallet na koji se radi deposit centraliziran? Po meni decentralizirana mjenjačnica može biti samo klasičan DEX na kojem nema deposita nego se trguje iz vlastitog walleta. Ovako kad korisnik napravi deposit, mjenjačnica uvijek ima kontrolu nad korisnikovim kriptovalutama.