Last update: 2026-01-14_Wed_23.48h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Pmalek receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Pmalek
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Pmalek" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66295316 (unedited backup) (by bhadz) (scraped on Wed Jan 14 23:47:37 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
Use Bitcoin. Everything else is secondary. We don't need any more examples.
I agree, nobody can freeze Bitcoin unless someone has intentionally deposit their Bitcoins into a centralized exchange. But if not and kept to their own personal wallets, there is no one that can freeze them.
I get your point, but to make it even more clear to readers, it’s the account (with only figures) that gets frozen through the C.exchange, not the Bitcoin.
The Bitcoin will still be sitting in the exchange's self-custody wallets.
Yeah, technically it's the account but also you've deposited it there and the exchange has the authority not to allow to withdraw your actual Bitcoins from them. So from that standpoint and easier terms to understand, one normal user would say that if it ever happens, the exchange has frozen their bitcoins.
Also,while it can’t be frozen, there are other ways to lose your Bitcoins too and wallet is part of it..so the personal wallet should be a trusted, open-sourced, self-custody wallet.
Exactly, and don't be a victim of those websites that can lead to phishing which is the new investors are prone to this.
2. Post 66294423 (unedited backup) (by Ivystar5) (scraped on Wed Jan 14 19:21:26 CET 2026) in Congratulations, KYC Is Now a Vibe Check:
It's scary when you think about it. The possibilities for abuse are endless.
A few years ago I remember reading on the forum about an exchange and their request to one trader. I can't remember which site. They asked the person to take a picture with a local newspaper in his hands. It has to be a local paper, that is sold in that locality, and not something national or international. While holding the newspaper, he has to stand in front of his street address sign or the building number has to be visible in the background.
With today's AI, you can do all that in a few minutes.
This whole process is like handing your life or your activities for life time into the hands of an exchange just because you have an activity to be conducted in their platforms, this very much scary more that what AIs can do
Furthermore, I have been seeing videos of AI generated videos with so much realistic looks which makes me thing that havung attempted an exchange verification process this AIs can still be prompted to do whatsoever, I'm just afraid how I can be represented with AI on cases that is crime related.
3. Post 66294411 (unedited backup) (by Agathamay) (scraped on Wed Jan 14 19:18:13 CET 2026) in Congratulations, KYC Is Now a Vibe Check:
It's scary when you think about it. The possibilities for abuse are endless.
A few years ago I remember reading on the forum about an exchange and their request to one trader. I can't remember which site. They asked the person to take a picture with a local newspaper in his hands. It has to be a local paper, that is sold in that locality, and not something national or international. While holding the newspaper, he has to stand in front of his street address sign or the building number has to be visible in the background.
With today's AI, you can do all that in a few minutes.
Everything has its advantages and disadvantages which today's AI isn't exempted.
I understand how we all want to avoid KYC and skip all these verifications but at some point, these AI innovations and upgrades are really becoming scary as we don't even know what to trust on the internet anymore as everything seems almost real.
I checked on x and at some point after watching that video severally, I think it might be a haven gateway for scammers and internet fraudsters, because those hoodlums never rest until they get what they want.
I don't even know if I'm to celebrate this AI innovations or not because I think it might do more harm than good
4. Post 66294180 (unedited backup) (by LTU_btc) (scraped on Wed Jan 14 18:21:50 CET 2026) in Why I wouldn't buy Ledger Nano S ever again?:
Check out the new type of phishing emails that scammers are sending to Ledger users, most probably to email addresses associated with various leaks.
They inform victims that they have been selected to attend a Ledger convention in Las Vegas. On top of that, they have won a special edition Golden Ledger hardware wallet. To accept the convention invitation and arrange delivery of the device, they need to click the "Accept invitation in Ledger Live" button. These scammers don't seem to have received the memo that the software is not called Ledger Live anymore.
My guess is that the button takes you to a fake Ledger Wallet link that then requires that you enter your personal information and recovery phrase.
I am sure there is no one here that will fall for something like this. Still, stay safe out there!
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/01/11/UFYAz2.jpegI also got this message. Last week Igot another kind of Ledger phishing scam:
Scammers is getting more creative because I haven't saw such message about Ledger and Trezor merger before. Usually I don't even notice such messages, but for some unknown reasons it wasn't moved to my spam folder, got it in my main feed.
5. Post 66293992 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Wed Jan 14 17:28:43 CET 2026) in Congratulations, KYC Is Now a Vibe Check:
It's scary when you think about it. The possibilities for abuse are endless.
A few years ago I remember reading on the forum about an exchange and their request to one trader. I can't remember which site. They asked the person to take a picture with a local newspaper in his hands. It has to be a local paper, that is sold in that locality, and not something national or international. While holding the newspaper, he has to stand in front of his street address sign or the building number has to be visible in the background.
With today's AI, you can do all that in a few minutes.
I remember that, and imagine, I didn't need AI to find that topic ->
Street Selfie? Why all these crazy requirements in the name of KYC verification?I don't know what CEXs will come up with next regarding KYC, but it definitely won't be easy. People may have to go to their office in person to open an account.
6. Post 66290760 (unedited backup) (by Felicity_Tide) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 19:38:25 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
It's not freedom money if there is a governor that can take it from you.
It's not freedom because it was never meant to represent one. Like I believe, a lot of the things that are digital today where literally rebranded from what has been in existence, and majority of the cryptocurrency are in no way different because they are centralized.The truth is, as long as anything is tied to centralization, there is always a chance of it being used as a weapon in sorting out political differences, and that's what this thread has proven. And not just political differences, but can also makes the lives those who heavily rely and trust in it, to be unbearable. It's a bit difficult these days to find a well established organization that doesn't fear the US.
And what's more dishearten is that despite all these unending drama that centralization causes, a lot of people still hasn't learnt because they feel it doesn't affect them.
7. Post 66290523 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 18:35:55 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
Use Bitcoin. Everything else is secondary. We don't need any more examples.
I agree, nobody can freeze Bitcoin unless someone has intentionally deposit their Bitcoins into a centralized exchange. But if not and kept to their own personal wallets, there is no one that can freeze them.
I get your point, but to make it even more clear to readers, it’s the account (with only figures) that gets frozen through the C.exchange, not the Bitcoin.
The Bitcoin will still be sitting in the exchange's self-custody wallets.
Also,while it can’t be frozen, there are other ways to lose your Bitcoins too and wallet is part of it..so the personal wallet should be a trusted, open-sourced, self-custody wallet.
By the way, a country trying to avoid US sanctions used a stablecoin from a company located in the US - really genius
That’s what happens when they refuse to stay informed..
8. Post 66290261 (unedited backup) (by _act_) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 17:30:07 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
It's going to take a long time for that to happen, in either direction. We can't expect Bitcoin with its tiny market cap to perform similarly to an asset with much bigger market cap (I am looking at you gold).
You are right about this, but the marketcap keeps growing. A time will later come that the marketcap will be huge, more institutions will invest in bitcoin while the institutions will defend the price in a way bitcoin will be seen more as a store of value just like gold. Bitcoin was volatile than this before but becoming less volatile gradually.
9. Post 66290246 (unedited backup) (by cr1776) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 17:26:50 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
...
The lesson is clear. You don't own centralized stablecoins. You co-own them with the issuer. ...
Use Bitcoin. Everything else is secondary. We don't need any more examples.
Exactly. Almost every cryptocurrency except bitcoin has risks like this. Look at Eth vs classic. And not to inject anything controversial here, but this shows how "filtering" could result in "filtering" transactions - it is the camel's nose under the tent. :-)
10. Post 66289932 (unedited backup) (by hd49728) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 16:00:49 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
Tether froze over $180 million in USDT across five wallets on the Tron blockchain a few days ago. It's believed that those wallets are connected to Venezuela, that used USDT for oil trade and to evade US sanctions. It's reported that 80% of Venezuela's oil revenue is settled in USDT. And what happened? US political interests happened, and that resulted in Tether freezing the addresses.
It's stablecoin Tether, and many other stablecoins have the same risk. It happened in the past, it just happened days ago and it will appear in the future as altcoin blockchains are centralized and most stablecoins are centralized as well.
PSA: Most stablecoins can be frozen, even in your own wallets.Stablecoin blacklists: How they work and who controls them.Stablecoins and blaclists.Use Bitcoin. Everything else is secondary. We don't need any more examples.
bitcoins can not be frozen in your non-custodial wallets. Bitcoin is unique and governments can not freeze your coins if you store your coins in non custodial wallets.
11. Post 66289881 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 15:47:01 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
~snip~
But Bitcoin doesn't have an issuer. Transactions settle every 10 minutes without asking the "Bitcoin Board of Directors" or the "CEO" if it's ok. Orange presidents can't call the "Bitcoin Security Department", threaten them with tariffs, and request a rollback or a freeze. The blockchain doesn't care who you are or who your political alliances are. Nodes don't discriminate, and only make sure that the rules are being followed.
It's not as simple as it seems, because you should keep in mind that at least a third of the hash power is located in mining farms located in the USA, and that although BTC transactions cannot be frozen, as is the case with most so-called stablecoins, they can be rejected by the mining pool, or the coin addresses from which they are sent can be blacklisted.
To make the situation even worse, let's not forget that the greatest peacemaker and that Chinese scumbag became very good friends overnight, which means that he will do whatever is asked of him, and I have no doubt that every other major CEX operating in the US will do the same.
By the way, a country trying to avoid US sanctions used a stablecoin from a company located in the US - really genius
12. Post 66289823 (unedited backup) (by bhadz) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 15:30:32 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
It's reported that 80% of Venezuela's oil revenue is settled in USDT. And what happened? US political interests happened, and that resulted in Tether freezing the addresses.
That's a lot of percentage from their oil there and if it's put into USDT, easy for Tether to freeze it.
Use Bitcoin. Everything else is secondary. We don't need any more examples.
I agree, nobody can freeze Bitcoin unless someone has intentionally deposit their Bitcoins into a centralized exchange. But if not and kept to their own personal wallets, there is no one that can freeze them.
Does it mean the Venezuelan governments cannot hire a Crypto Enthusiast who is professional enough to advise them on the disadvantages of leaving asset in a centralized platform.
I think that each government now has their staff who has at least basic knowledge about how to transfer, deposit/withdraw cryptos.
13. Post 66289410 (unedited backup) (by 348Judah) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 13:21:43 CET 2026) in Stick with bitcoin and stay away from centralized crypto, especially stablecoins:
Tether froze over $180 million in USDT across five wallets on the Tron blockchain a few days ago. It's believed that those wallets are connected to Venezuela, that used USDT for oil trade and to evade US sanctions. It's reported that 80% of Venezuela's oil revenue is settled in USDT. And what happened? US political interests happened, and that resulted in Tether freezing the addresses.
Source:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tether-freezes-182m-usdt-largest-105442400.html What does all these suggest, that even if it were to be bitcoin, users will also be affected in the same manners once they are using it from a custodial storage like that of a centralized exchange, we have to be careful these days, when we have asset that worth thousands or millions, we should avoid the use of a custodial storage for them, very soon, these may also extend to all exchanges users for one reason or the other, we should learn before it becomes too late for us.
14. Post 66289174 (unedited backup) (by melinoe) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 12:05:13 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
I still do not think that reputed casinos share this with other casinos or even any such formal/informal co-operation exist. I mean, this is a very competitive industry after all
.
When I said that they may share such information with their gaming partners, I was thinking more of game providers and sports betting providers and not with competitor casinos. But it's also common that one company owns two or more online casinos. When that is the case, perhaps those platforms cooperate and work together to battle fraud and learn from each other's experiences, both positive and negative.
Even if they do so, they can't tell about it outright.
Usually each platform is under different entities (firms, groups of firms, so on), even though they are, in fact, connected.
15. Post 66289164 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 12:01:43 CET 2026) in Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian):
Većina online trgovina koja prima bitcoin automatski ga pretvara u fiat kad se transakcija potvrdi na blockchainu. Veoma mali broj zadrži bitcoin u svojim novčanicima. Trgovinama je u interesu da se tranksakcija potvrdi čim prije. Zato često imaš samo 10 ili 20 minuta da izvršiš uplatu po onom tečaju kojeg ti trgovina zaključa za taj period. Neke trgovine koriste promjenjiv tečaj. Ako platiš nisku naknadu a bitcoin krene da pada dok se transakcija zvanično ne potvrdi na blockchainu, trgovine gube novac kada uzmemo u obzir protuvrijednost u EUR/USD ili šta već. Vrijednost može naravno i da poraste.
Na nekim online shop-ovima sam viđao informaciju da će možda bit potrebno doplatiti dodatno ako se vrijednost BTC-a značajno promjeni dok trgovini ne bude potvrđena transakcija.
Mislim da trgovine (barem one u Hrvatskoj) niti ne smiju zadržati Bitcoin koji im korisnik plati. Zapravo, mislim čak i da ne smiju prodavati robu i usluge za kripto nego samo preko posrednika kao što je Paycek koji onda radi konverziju u fiat.
Sad kad malo razmislim, nije istina ono što sam napisao da sam skoro svaki put kod kupnje nečega direktno plaćao BTC iz walleta. Mislim, jesam, ali to je opet bilo preko drugih payment providera (ne preko Payceka) jer većinom kupujem u inozemstvu.
Da, firme na svoje poslovne bankovne račune moraju položiti dnevni utržak u eurima, nema opcije da predaju bitcoine.
Zbog toga je Electrocoin i razvio paycek kao premosnicu između zahtjeva korisnika da plaćaju kriptovalutama i zakonskih obveza da na kraju dana trgovac mora imati eure u svojoj blagajni.
Trgovci su dobili još jednu opciju da privuku turiste i mlađe da troše kod njih umjesto kod konkurencije, korisnici imaju priliku da direktno troše svoje kriptovalute ako to žele a i Electrocoin zarađuje na svojoj aplikaciji.
Win win za sve.
16. Post 66288993 (unedited backup) (by nemesis_incarnate) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 10:59:13 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
That's what he is trying to do. His goal is to get back the money that he gambled away. His issue isn't that Bitz allowed him to play. It's that he lost. And because he lost, he wants his money back.
That’s pretty obvious.
If he really cared about how the TOS wasn’t properly implemented, he could’ve acted on it earlier and called the casino’s attention not only when he lost money.
What it looks like instead is spotting a loophole and using it against the casino only after losing, which honestly feels more like blackmail. Hopefully other casinos take note of scenarios like this, where a user suddenly questions the rules about who’s allowed to play only when things don’t go their way.
I’ll stop here, but personally, I don’t support this kind of behavior.
Nobody does and nobody wants to get caught doing it, but it's like a web, and to untie it, it will always be not enough info to do so properly, especially at a place where you are not obliged to tell every part of the story.
17. Post 66288812 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 09:47:37 CET 2026) in Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian):
Većina online trgovina koja prima bitcoin automatski ga pretvara u fiat kad se transakcija potvrdi na blockchainu. Veoma mali broj zadrži bitcoin u svojim novčanicima. Trgovinama je u interesu da se tranksakcija potvrdi čim prije. Zato često imaš samo 10 ili 20 minuta da izvršiš uplatu po onom tečaju kojeg ti trgovina zaključa za taj period. Neke trgovine koriste promjenjiv tečaj. Ako platiš nisku naknadu a bitcoin krene da pada dok se transakcija zvanično ne potvrdi na blockchainu, trgovine gube novac kada uzmemo u obzir protuvrijednost u EUR/USD ili šta već. Vrijednost može naravno i da poraste.
Na nekim online shop-ovima sam viđao informaciju da će možda bit potrebno doplatiti dodatno ako se vrijednost BTC-a značajno promjeni dok trgovini ne bude potvrđena transakcija.
Mislim da trgovine (barem one u Hrvatskoj) niti ne smiju zadržati Bitcoin koji im korisnik plati. Zapravo, mislim čak i da ne smiju prodavati robu i usluge za kripto nego samo preko posrednika kao što je Paycek koji onda radi konverziju u fiat.
Sad kad malo razmislim, nije istina ono što sam napisao da sam skoro svaki put kod kupnje nečega direktno plaćao BTC iz walleta. Mislim, jesam, ali to je opet bilo preko drugih payment providera (ne preko Payceka) jer većinom kupujem u inozemstvu.
18. Post 66288226 (unedited backup) (by Mandoy) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 04:11:26 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
No, that's not always the case. I have seen in the Scam Accusation board many examples where players are asked to undergo identity verification. Once they submit all the documents the casino asks for, the site locks their account, confiscates all their money, or returns only the deposits without the winnings. Casinos often know what you did even before they ask for KYC. The KYC request is just there to connect someone's wrongdoings with their real identity, which they can then keep on file or share with gaming partners.
This is actually a fairly common case, we've seen quite a few users (mostly newbies signing up) and complaining that after they submitted KYC, they were then blocked and not allowed to access their accounts/funds anymore. I'm also guessing that it's because, after confirming their identity, are associating them with malicious activities that the casino acknowledged beforehand, but didn't have the necessary evidence, perhaps it's a user who's multiaccounting or has done it again in the past. The truth is that we can never fully know what has happened from both sides.
Not only about KYC but all the reports I have seen against a casino site are done from newbie accounts. I think these are nothing but spamming. I am talking about how those who do not know about this forum and are not in this forum, after facing any problem on a casino site, suddenly know about this forum and come here and report about that site where that site is promoted in different places. For this I do not give importance to any newbie's report unless they can post some kind of valid proof
Verification by casinos is an actual occurrence and some clients lose their access to their money after KYC. Nonetheless, most of the accusations are a result of unsubstantiated new stories, which are doubtful. That is why proofs are highly valued in scamming reports. It is easy to judge cases fairly, with the help of screenshots, details of transactions, and clear explanations. Casinos we should be wary of, but so also are all unproven claims.
19. Post 66287902 (unedited backup) (by khaled0111) (scraped on Tue Jan 13 00:34:38 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
I have seen in the Scam Accusation board many examples where players are asked to undergo identity verification. Once they submit all the documents the casino asks for, the site locks their account, confiscates all their money, or returns only the deposits without the winnings. Casinos often know what you did even before they ask for KYC.
That’s correct, and in most cases, based on what they are accusing you of, it’s easy to tell whether they are asking you to verify your identity to help resolve your case or just because they know for sure that you breached their terms and need to know who you are (your real identity).
20. Post 66287561 (unedited backup) (by mirakal) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 22:50:38 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
That's what he is trying to do. His goal is to get back the money that he gambled away. His issue isn't that Bitz allowed him to play. It's that he lost. And because he lost, he wants his money back.
That’s pretty obvious.
If he really cared about how the TOS wasn’t properly implemented, he could’ve acted on it earlier and called the casino’s attention not only when he lost money.
What it looks like instead is spotting a loophole and using it against the casino only after losing, which honestly feels more like blackmail. Hopefully other casinos take note of scenarios like this, where a user suddenly questions the rules about who’s allowed to play only when things don’t go their way.
I’ll stop here, but personally, I don’t support this kind of behavior.
21. Post 66287190 (unedited backup) (by Z_MBFM) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 21:17:43 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
No, that's not always the case. I have seen in the Scam Accusation board many examples where players are asked to undergo identity verification. Once they submit all the documents the casino asks for, the site locks their account, confiscates all their money, or returns only the deposits without the winnings. Casinos often know what you did even before they ask for KYC. The KYC request is just there to connect someone's wrongdoings with their real identity, which they can then keep on file or share with gaming partners.
This is actually a fairly common case, we've seen quite a few users (mostly newbies signing up) and complaining that after they submitted KYC, they were then blocked and not allowed to access their accounts/funds anymore. I'm also guessing that it's because, after confirming their identity, are associating them with malicious activities that the casino acknowledged beforehand, but didn't have the necessary evidence, perhaps it's a user who's multiaccounting or has done it again in the past. The truth is that we can never fully know what has happened from both sides.
Not only about KYC but all the reports I have seen against a casino site are done from newbie accounts. I think these are nothing but spamming. I am talking about how those who do not know about this forum and are not in this forum, after facing any problem on a casino site, suddenly know about this forum and come here and report about that site where that site is promoted in different places. For this I do not give importance to any newbie's report unless they can post some kind of valid proof
22. Post 66286927 (unedited backup) (by Ultegra134) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 20:07:26 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
No, that's not always the case. I have seen in the Scam Accusation board many examples where players are asked to undergo identity verification. Once they submit all the documents the casino asks for, the site locks their account, confiscates all their money, or returns only the deposits without the winnings. Casinos often know what you did even before they ask for KYC. The KYC request is just there to connect someone's wrongdoings with their real identity, which they can then keep on file or share with gaming partners.
This is actually a fairly common case, we've seen quite a few users (mostly newbies signing up) and complaining that after they submitted KYC, they were then blocked and not allowed to access their accounts/funds anymore. I'm also guessing that it's because, after confirming their identity, are associating them with malicious activities that the casino acknowledged beforehand, but didn't have the necessary evidence, perhaps it's a user who's multiaccounting or has done it again in the past. The truth is that we can never fully know what has happened from both sides.
23. Post 66286750 (unedited backup) (by notblox1) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 19:12:08 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
No, that's not always the case. I have seen in the Scam Accusation board many examples where players are asked to undergo identity verification. Once they submit all the documents the casino asks for, the site locks their account, confiscates all their money, or returns only the deposits without the winnings. Casinos often know what you did even before they ask for KYC. The KYC request is just there to connect someone's wrongdoings with their real identity, which they can then keep on file or share with gaming partners.
This days it is not so hard to get fake documents and selfies from someone else, so that wont stop real scammers or hackers from scamming.
I know of cases when some bad casinos refused to return deposited money even for players who did nothing wrong, and they later lost in court and had to pay extra.
Most casinos have the right to ban everyone and close their accounts if this is stated in their ToS.
24. Post 66286530 (unedited backup) (by memehunter) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 18:28:50 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
The KYC request is just there to connect someone's wrongdoings with their real identity, which they can then keep on file or share with gaming partners.
Yeah, most of the times it is just an additional proof against your (player's) fraudulent activities. Fraudsters uses many times fake/stolen KYC documents and casino's cheating prevention department can also use that to train their employees about innovations in cheating/forging lol.
I still do not think that reputed casinos share this with other casinos or even any such formal/informal co-operation exist. I mean, this is a very competitive industry after all
.
25. Post 66286497 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 18:23:43 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ Bundesliga GOALFEST ⚽ 16 January:
* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **
Courtesy tag for those who love football
Zwei
Harkorede
xandry
Pmalek
cryptofrka
xLays
Jinetics1111
jayce
LFC_Bitcoin
entebah
Lakai01
notblox1
BABY SHOES
Z-tight
Rikafip
darxiaomi
el che
hosemary
KTChampions
CLS63
Dump3er
Smartvirus
mv1986
slaman29
vivekdhyani1
mitchr4
Trofo
goodpunt
Betwrong
Woodie
mole0815
Strongkored
famososMuertos
SatoPrincess
hilariousandco
holydarkness
tiCeR
buwaytress
VashaUdacha777
Mahdirakib
Ochan_yazo_tochant
Koal-84
Ryu_Ar1
Slissy
26. Post 66286454 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 18:15:07 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | 🏈 NFL Division Round 🏈 Bills vs Broncos 🏈 17 January:
* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **
Courtesy tag for those who love the NFL
xandry
Zwei
el che
notblox1
LFC_Bitcoin
Pmalek
KTChampions
Trofo
ovcijisir
Dump3er
slaman29
goodpunt
famososMuertos
hilariousandco
tiCeR
buwaytress
VashaUdacha777
vivekdhyani1
jeremypwr
Slissy
mole0815
mv1986
holydarkness
Jinetics1111
CLS63
jayce
Woodie
mitchr4
Betwrong
Harkorede
Z-tight
Rikafip
cryptofrka
entebah
ILuckyGuyI
Porfirii
27. Post 66285122 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 12:41:07 CET 2026) in Why I wouldn't buy Ledger Nano S ever again?:
I am sure there is no one here that will fall for something like this. Still, stay safe out there!
Here probably not, but I am pretty sure some will fall for this (pretty weak imho) attempt.
My email address was among those leaked years ago, and for whatever reason I only got few phishing emails (iirc no more than 5-6 alltogether) and last one was several years ago.
28. Post 66285035 (unedited backup) (by henry_of_skalitz) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 12:03:19 CET 2026) in Does Bitcoin destroy the environment or is it just political propaganda?:
Bitcoin is supposedly not environmentally-friendly, but I am sure if we added a new type of tax to it for "destroying the environment", nations and the banking cartel would be pleased with that. Every time you hear that something is destroying our environment, know that it is either a cash or power grab, or both.
I am sure the WEF climate activists, arriving to their annual Davos meetings in their private jets (one jet for each person and their team) will find a way to raise extra funding... I mean save our planet.
Bitcoin mining has become one of the most renewable-intensive industries globally, with 43-52.4% of operations now powered by clean energy sources.
It combines lots of different sources of energy under its belt aand the argument like that is just foolish.
There are lots of articles that would debunk this kind of FUD.
29. Post 66284116 (unedited backup) (by ptaylor78) (scraped on Mon Jan 12 02:29:14 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
The dispute always has been only about responsible gaming failures and refusal to honor exclusion requests. Anyone still clinging to the "you shouldn't have been there" talking point is arguing against Bitz's own written guidance and support messages and not reading the complaint carefully.
I'll leave this here for anyone confused or still pretending that "being from a restricted country" is an issue in this dispute.
1. Bitz openly publishes instructions encouraging users to use Bitz-branded VPN to “play without restrictions from any country,” including recommending specific regions to connect through. That is explicit encouragement to access the platform from a location other than where the user is physically located.
And if you want to argue that VPN use “doesn’t apply” to players from restricted countries and is somehow only meant for permitted players, then explain this. Why is Bitz encouraging users to use a VPN to access games that the provider itself blocks in certain countries? Providers block games by jurisdiction for regulatory reasons. Bitz is telling players to bypass those blocks. That has nothing to do with “loading issues.” That is guidance on how to defeat geographic restrictions imposed by the provider.
2. Bitz’s own support explicitly advises players from restricted countries that they “may play,” with the only limitation being potential site or game loading issues. No warning about violations. No instruction to leave. No account blocking.
The restricted-country issue is not relevant to resolving this dispute. Read the complaint. It never was. That said, it’s worth clarifying once so we can put an end to the posts grasping at it as a distraction after
Pmalek astutely raised this red herring.
30. Post 66283629 (unedited backup) (by freedomgo) (scraped on Sun Jan 11 23:05:38 CET 2026) in If this comes to past it will accelerate adoption :
The question is, what kind of tax and on what kind of bitcoin transactions?
Since the report says it will remove the tax, that means there’s already an existing one. The only thing that comes to my mind is capital gains tax when selling Bitcoin. If I remember correctly, the rate can go as high as 20%, which is already a big chunk.
So if this actually gets approved, that’s a pretty significant amount of profit you get to keep instead of handing it over as tax.
31. Post 66283084 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Sun Jan 11 20:36:13 CET 2026) in BIP39 Passphrase (the 25th word): A security layer or a self-lockout trap?:
You should try entering a seed phrase or a long and complex passphrase on a Blockstream Jade, which has left/right navigational buttons to navigate through the letters of the alphabet, numbers, and symbols. It's a lot of fun.
I already find it annoying to type passphrases on my Trezor Model T, imagine typing lengthy passphrases on a device that only allows two-button navigation. To avoid taking so long and having to switch character types, perhaps it would be better to use passphrases like:
outfield rearview fiftieth outshine chatter drab
That's why I think hardware wallets with a QWERTY keyboard like Coldcard Q and Passport Prime (when it's released) are necessary.
I would even go one step further and send a small test transaction to the restored wallet. After that, send it back out again to ensure that it's working properly. That gives me greater peace of mind.
Another approach would be to note the fingerprint #00000000 that each wallet has, it changes every time a new passphrase is typed, but of course it's necessary to test at least 4 times if the passphrase is accessing the same wallet.
32. Post 66282958 (unedited backup) (by hafezaldubaili@gmail.com) (scraped on Sun Jan 11 20:05:19 CET 2026) in Nation-States hunting for SEEDs?:
You should always carefully check every output addresses before you sign a transaction with your hardware signing device. For this very reason it's mandatory that your signing device has an own independant display that can't be manipulated by the software wallet that hands over the transaction to be signed.
I only recently
found out there's a thing called "blind signing" for shitcoins like Ethereum. Instead of confirming each address on your screen, you have to tell your hardware wallet to just trust the software again. So that's how people got all their coins stolen from their hardware wallet.
Correct, but also quite wrong -- this is not the primary reason why people are losing their coins, not even close. What blind signing does is abstract away some of the details, but the primary culprit is interacting with malicious and phishing contracts. Do you really think that the average user would be able to interpret the calls when doing an interaction even if they were hidden? Absolutely not. Those that can drain everything that you have because most of these shitcoins have token standards that do not have native ownership. Even if wallets had complete clear signing, this would still not prevent most of these cases of scamming. What is the difference between a legitimate contract and fraudulent contract that requires you to approve unlimited allowance for USDC and similar actions (say deposit/stake)? Nothing, the average user would never be able to tell even if all ABI information was displayed for every contract (it never will be).
What they do over there is generally terrible, but let's be clear about the real causes of things. The best type of attack that shows how shitcoins are stupid is the one where a single signing drains all of your balances across every chain of the same type and all of their layers
from a hardware wallet, for example EVM based chains.
I had a friend buy some Bitcoin and kept stressing the importance of security to him. Hardware wallets weren’t really popular yet at the time, so I suggested he install the Bitpie app on a dedicated phone and set a very strong wallet password. Unfortunately, he later forgot the password, and those two Bitcoins have been stuck there ever since, unable to be moved.
I have never heard of Bitpie or know anyone that has used it. By the sound of it, it looks like a custodial service. Is it? Did your friend not generate a seed phrase or received private keys to the addresses where he sent his bitcoin? Wallet passwords are meant to encrypt files locally, so that if an unauthorized third-party got hold of them, they couldn't abuse them. But you should always be able to recover your wallet elsewhere using a recovery phrase or individual private keys.
Custodial services suck, but in terms of user failures in this case there is nothing different between a custodial or non custodial wallet. A proper failure to to store key information (which differs between wallet types) and then forgetting it will lead to a loss of coin or coin being stuck in both cases.
Bad, but this is nothing compared to the number of systems activated by these or similar tools. It is in the hundreds of millions of devices. Of course some malicious actors will jump on the opportunity, still the data shows that it represents a small amount of devices that actually have a malicious activator. The amount stolen would be much higher otherwise. Anyway there is no reason to use Windows at all, and if someone does need it they can install it in a virtual machine without a network adapter. That way it is not going to be a problem even if you put a malware-infested copy of Windows on it. The exception would be malware that targets the VM but average users commonly don't stumble upon that.
But the simple fact that it's an activator, which can be hosted by any site, without any provenance, closed source code, and so on, is all unfavorable signs that you shouldn't install it on a PC with an unactivated Windows, because what are the chances of not having something very unpleasant there?
The simple fact that it's not open source and that there's no official team behind it already makes me want to stay away from this kind of thing. It's true that just not using Windows eliminates these problems, but if there's no other way, for example, having a pc for work to run things that only work on Windows-compatible software, the best thing is not to tempt fate and acquire a license.
Correct, but wrong. Pretty much all cracking is closed source on average, this includes everything from software to video games for Windows. If you download it from suspicious sources, then you may get in trouble. If you download it from legitimate sources and authors, you will be fine. The percentage of users that get malware this way is very tiny compared to the users that successfully use things. Yes, it would be better if things were open source -- but this is the realistic state of things. Activators should not be singled out, people who use activators are likely using other software or games that are cracked too. Anyway, if I recall correctly there was once an open source activator for Windows 10 but I don't know if it that is still a thing.
Besides, nowadays computers already come with pre-activated OEM Windows licenses...
If you buy a pre-built computer or a laptop maybe, but that is for the amateurs.
33. Post 66279937 (unedited backup) (by salad daging) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 22:05:31 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
I am sure Punkz will add those eventually to its casino catalogue.
Punkz will probably add a slot from this provider if it is released, in my experience playing demos in this slot is less interesting in terms of visuals and winnings.
I was intrigued when saw that game provider but I don’t dare to try new provider after experiencing a terrible loss on Shadylady slot game provider which is new to me.
Rest for a while after recovering you can return.
Anyone here manage to try a bonus buy on that slot games? I still doesn’t check the games.
Slots from provider SneakySlots have no buy bonus, you can only activate
Sneaky Boost with regular Sneaky 2x bet level - Sneaky Super 5x bet increase, this only increases the super bonus chance.
With 3 Slots available now it's still not exciting enough.
34. Post 66279384 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 19:46:07 CET 2026) in Novosti:
@slackovic
Nemoj zaboraviti da i Blockchair explorer nudi besplatne AML provjere preko nekoliko izvora.
https://blockchair.com/Ne znam koliko su precizne i tačne te analize ali može se probati. Naravno, guraj sve to preko VPNa. Imaju i Tor stranicu ako nekog zanima.
Tenks za ovo, provjerio sam sve adrese i većina ima low score. Samo jedna je 85/100 risk, tu ću očistiti i flaggati adresu da ju više ne koristim.
Ona je jedna od 2 s više od 50 tx-ova tako da nije ni čudno, ono što je čudno je da je druga s 450 tx-eva zapravo ful čista. Međutim - na njoj ionako imam neki sitniš i neću ni nju više koristiti.
35. Post 66278900 (unedited backup) (by Mahdirakib) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 17:43:19 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
I just realized that Casinopunkz has rebranded to Punkz.com. I'm wondering why the rebrand has been done. They have added the sportsbook, but I don't see any other changes on the platform. And my country is still on the restricted countries list there. They haven't added the geo-blocking system yet.
~snip~ I don't think instant versions of crash games are as popular as the standard games.
There won't be any option to do the cashout manually on instant version of Crash game. Limbo can be considered as an instant version of Crash game. But Limbo isn’t popular like the Crash game.
36. Post 66278583 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 16:20:25 CET 2026) in Nation-States hunting for SEEDs?:
Custodial services suck, but in terms of user failures in this case there is nothing different between a custodial or non custodial wallet. A proper failure to to store key information (which differs between wallet types) and then forgetting it will lead to a loss of coin or coin being stuck in both cases.
There is one major distinction between custodial and non custodial services. If you forget or don't make backups of your private key information and the software where those keys are stored malfunctions, you are done. You lose access to your coins and you will never get them back. Custodial services are controlled by someone else, and you can lose access to them. If you do, there will be a way back in, by proving to the custodian that you are who you say you are. That can be as simple as resetting a password over e-mail, entering a code sent to you via SMS, or doing (another round of) KYC to verify yourself. After that, the custodian can give you access to your bitcoin again.
Not necessarily. There are custodial solutions that require both you and the custodian, and if you lose the key information here from your side they can do nothing for you. Furthermore, again you make a false comparison by having an unfair assumption on the side of the custodial solution where you retain key information so that you are able to "reset" something. Losing private key information is the same as losing everything for a custodial solution, in the case of one that requires an email and password -- you lose both the email account and password. Getting that back will be extremely difficult unless there is KYC involved, but that defeats the purpose. Correct comparisons would be the following, don't mix and match.
Non-custodial: Lost wallet password, retained private key or seed phrase backup. Recovery possible.
Custodial: Lost account or wallet password, retained email account or phone number or whatever else was used. Recovery possible.
Non-custodial: Lost wallet password, and lost private key or seed phrase. Recovery impossible.
Custodial (no KYC): Lost account or wallet password, lost email account or phone number or whatever else was used. Recovery most likely impossible.
In terms of recovery, the custodial solution only has a small benefit in the second case but I don't believe that in most of those cases recovery will be possible.
Lazy people can feel it is safe as they can recover their account from password to 2FA, but there is bigger risk than non-custodial wallets. Centralized exchanges can close their service as scam, their exchanges can be seized like TradeOrge exchange or their exchanges can be hacked and bankrupted after that.
We can talk about different tradeoffs in different perspectives, but ultimately Not Your Keys Not Your Bitcoin always prevails. No matter how you approach this topic, non custodial wallets are always the best choice by far. They are best for the user, they are best for the network. I'd only recommend custodial to people who can barely use technology at all (being able to open some apps on a smartphone does not count).
37. Post 66278357 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 15:18:14 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
16. 11671:
Kluge (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 13813:
smooth (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 14001:
MiningBuddy (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 14210:
simpic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
319 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 18312:
phantastisch (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
363 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 18595:
2weiX (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (7 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 18640:
SebastianJu (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
83 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 18953:
Stemby (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 19971:
-ck (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
701 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 20300:
Otoh (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
246 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 20651:
coblee (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
365 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 23092:
malevolent (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
728 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 23324:
Balthazar (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (
362 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 23810:
yxt (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
116 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 24140:
qwk (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
2538 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 25960:
smoothie (
Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (
495 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 27470:
cygan (
Trust: +64 / =2 / -0) (
10534 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 29642:
Lincoln6Echo (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
63 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 30964:
Spotswood (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 31288:
John (John K.) (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
236 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 31539:
Michail1 (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
165 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 31931:
Anduck (
Trust: +20 / =2 / -1) (
72 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 33155:
tiCeR (
Trust: neutral) (
503 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 34692:
fronti (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
310 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 35501:
cAPSLOCK (
Trust: neutral) (
5983 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 36455:
picchio (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
120 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 38894:
SaltySpitoon (
Trust: +21 / =1 / -1) (
1160 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 41175:
infofront (
Trust: neutral) (
2095 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 41911:
BadBear (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
135 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 42189:
eckmar (
Trust: neutral) (
38 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 43526:
ocminer (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
245 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 47656:
P_Shep (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
408 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 49008:
jojo69 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
4256 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
1727 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 55122:
DiamondCardz (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
118 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
2672 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 55503:
squall1066 (
Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (
32 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 60791:
lassdas (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
508 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 60820:
DannyHamilton (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
4348 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 62955:
odolvlobo (
Trust: neutral) (
2744 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 64205:
Carlton Banks (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
2099 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 65034:
dozerz (
Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (
88 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 65317:
bigtimespaghetti (
Trust: +21 / =0 / -1) (
57 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 65716:
CoinEraser (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1269 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 67210:
Richy_T (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1751 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 68448:
KonstantinosM (
Trust: neutral) (
263 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 70535:
KWH (
Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (
81 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 71414:
mnightwaffle (
Trust: +12 / =4 / -0) (
14 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 74263:
BG4 (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 76206:
bertani (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 79608:
Flying Hellfish (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
776 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 80081:
hephaist0s (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
34 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 80810:
solosequenosenada (
Trust: neutral) (
292 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 81292:
Stunna (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
285 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 81572:
Milquetoast (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
31 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 81962:
monkeynuts (
Trust: +30 / =1 / -0) (
259 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 82709:
Coinfan (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
117 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 83038:
miffman (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
3290 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 86549:
alexrossi (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
803 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 87930:
bitserve (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
1516 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 88912:
600watt (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
1106 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 91492:
fsm247 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 94840:
fluffypony (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
60 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 96650:
Guido (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 97179:
joeperry (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
444 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 98986:
TMAN (
Trust: +25 / =1 / -1) (
1308 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 99165:
Searing (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
820 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 99837:
HeRetiK (
Trust: neutral) (
1821 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 102795:
kurious (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
749 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 103764:
Evilish (
Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (
64 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 104297:
kimosan (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 107762:
NLNico (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
313 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 107855:
Wed (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
18 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 109325:
mars78 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (6 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 109430:
TookDk (
Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (
62 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 109754:
emdes (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 110383:
Bytekiller (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 111872:
Deathwing (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
329 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
8397 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 112568:
Adriano (
Trust: neutral) (
88 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
97. 112877:
BitcoinBarrel (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
38 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
98. 115075:
bitwhizz (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
99. 115423:
Micio (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
283 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
100. 120694:
xhomerx10 (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
9633 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
101. 120714:
gdassori (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
102. 122882:
klintay (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
32 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
103. 123869:
wttbs (
Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (
109 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
104. 124440:
btct22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
105. 125583:
tokeweed (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
593 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
106. 129764:
Ticked (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
224 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
107. 130358:
c4shm3n (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
108. 130792:
sidehack (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
871 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
109. 131351:
djjacket (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
110. 132212:
dArkjON (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
16 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
111. 133846:
monbux (
Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (
29 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
112. 134226:
Nestade (
Trust: neutral) (
783 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
113. 134378:
Blazed (
Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (
119 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
114. 138833:
allyouracid (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
292 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
115. 138940:
minifrij (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
269 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
116. 143492:
girino (
Trust: neutral) (
170 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
117. 143551:
johoe (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
195 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
118. 144671:
unick (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
119. 144811:
bittawm (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
87 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
120. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
197 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
121. 146601:
ndnh (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (9 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
122. 147451:
klaaas (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
44 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
123. 149135:
xzone (
Trust: neutral) (
1256 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
124. 149433:
Biffa (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
225 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
125. 153149:
arallmuus (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
484 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
126. 153656:
TheNewAnon135246 (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
989 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
127. 154400:
bitguy101 (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
128. 154816:
cagrund (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
129. 155345:
gentlemand (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
2089 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
130. 155421:
dsattler (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
131. 157000:
Bitze (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
42 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
132. 157691:
piebeyb (
Trust: neutral) (
39 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
133. 159292:
Arriemoller (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1330 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
134. 160943:
greenplastic (
Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (
137 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
135. 161364:
pĂĽsĂĽr (
Trust: neutral) (
827 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
136. 161795:
eoakland (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
137. 165089:
Anon39 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
10 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
138. 169384:
Paashaas (
Trust: neutral) (
4787 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
139. 170557:
AT101ET (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
369 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
140. 170839:
audiotopix (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
12 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
141. 175302:
Avirunes (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
472 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
142. 175361:
DooMAD (
Trust: neutral) (
2202 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. Post 66278316 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 15:07:31 CET 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-01-02_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1767322059 1 178336.msg66241445 3545203 2755547
1767321823 1 178336.msg66246287 198573 64507
1767321099 2 26136.msg66243515 85033 27470
1767320875 3 5568884.msg66242500 85033 3547723
1767319855 1 5570157.msg66243757 2168312 2739424
1767318295 7 5569385.msg66210434 1068464 30747
1767318290 1 5545813.msg66246253 1856852 1265260
1767318207 3 232519.msg66246254 1068464 3594134
1767316649 1 178336.msg66246191 33156 3570710
1767316140 1 5568613.msg66246107 1265260 1856852
1767315683 2 5182222.msg66229628 1068464 805820
1767315120 1 5570180.msg66243184 831523 839568
1767315012 1 5569532.msg66244582 1593137 1414197
1767314629 3 232519.msg66246161 1068464 3716311
1767314080 1 5521271.msg66244146 1593137 1053119
1767313450 2 5516918.msg66206262 3614991 3574904
1767312450 1 5570180.msg66243184 3430388 839568
1767312160 1 5570180.msg66243184 1827294 839568
1767312002 1 5503125.msg64338145 252510 334783
1767311968 1 5570180.msg66244051 1827294 2747752
1767311956 1 5570180.msg66243184 1827294 839568
1767311813 1 5503125.msg64335426 252510 557798
1767310797 1 5561206.msg66242149 3470657 3724416
1767310173 1 5569933.msg66234727 1856852 881377
1767309027 1 5570164.msg66242763 988039 1478835
1767308881 1 5100349.msg66243667 988039 320412
1767308873 1 5489866.msg66243539 252510 751988
1767308685 1 5570073.msg66245752 1365271 1190631
1767308442 1 5569192.msg66220944 2755792 3704391
1767308213 1 178336.msg66245584 1089623 18321
1767307762 1 5268108.msg66242961 302041 2836461
1767307324 1 5533985.msg66244550 3532447 1107222
1767306955 1 178336.msg66245776 252510 3283582
1767306955 1 5268108.msg66241115 302041 1852120
1767306514 1 5570094.msg66240044 3575638 1031572
1767306475 1 5570120.msg66245819 33156 3489845
1767306248 2 5487753.msg66213864 3546930 3685373
1767306244 1 5479271.msg66245184 3528115 2015418
1767306235 1 5479271.msg66245019 3528115 335088
1767306232 1 5199499.msg66245459 2775937 1006729
1767305891 1 178336.msg66244803 33156 198573
1767305776 1 5569769.msg66227428 816893 3735576
1767305293 1 5132720.msg66245598 252510 3727026
1767304693 1 5132720.msg66245558 252510 3430388
1767304314 1 178336.msg66241445 3283582 2755547
1767304258 1 178336.msg66241216 3283582 64507
1767304195 1 5570070.msg66245297 2755792 2775483
1767304012 1 232519.msg66243280 3580530 3594134
1767303990 1 232519.msg66241686 3580530 3720043
1767302401 1 178336.msg66245557 223922 64507
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (54 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2996 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 02 Jan 2026 03:47:39 AM CET,
DirtyKeyboard (
history) sent 1 Merit to
OutOfMemory (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 02 Jan 2026 03:43:43 AM CET,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
philipma1957 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 02 Jan 2026 03:31:39 AM CET,
d5000 (
history) sent 2 Merit to
cygan (
history) for
Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf.
On Fri 02 Jan 2026 03:27:55 AM CET,
d5000 (
history) sent 3 Merit to
Ambatman (
history) for
Re: Consumerism and Destructive Behavior: A Case against ANY Monetary Inflation.
On Fri 02 Jan 2026 03:10:55 AM CET,
yhiaali3 (
history) sent 1 Merit to
NotATether (
history) for
Re: ترقية فيرمي تسرّع شبكة BNB.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (569 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8282 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 878 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3741008:
NINI2501 (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3741074:
TechGr8 (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3741114:
cutecui (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3741133:
orenz0 (
history) earned: 41 Merit.
3741528:
MusicLand (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3738152: Fresh_Milk
3738205: xXHenneBXx
3738277: TheNextBigThinger0x0
3738491: meangoat
3738543: InvestigatingWOZX
3738697: art3m1s_37
3738700: KawasakiNinja1_
3738840: Rah12345
3738956: boombitty
3739036: Unixx
3739052: AmlRiskMonitor
3739109: Bjoern90
3739221: marywill9020
3739255: Amzender
3739266: NyktersteinMD
3739326: Raisero
3739388: Vanellp
3739483: JaredIbrahim
3739490: Blour
3739617: Chononaut
3739632: Sheylon
3739635: coupcoup
3739636: cudumbro
3739640: darkrangerat
3739781: BigNoteh
3739792: Wildead Casino
3739859: clex88
3739996: hikrimen
3740053: georgino22222
3740057: Becassinewantstocomeback
3740061: Baseplate
3740085: Taurox
3740105: Tinubu
3740133: TokenTsunami
3740134: AI Buster
3740293: Eze BTC
3740425: untruth997
3740508: durcoin
3740518: clayderman
3740569: CryptoVoyager24
3740677: emiliamuller6710
3740690: AML Bot
3740756: Kunda2025
3740817: cleanycleany
3740953: contesthunters.com
3741008: NINI2501
3741074: TechGr8
3741114: cutecui
3741133: orenz0
3741528: MusicLand
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8282
4:0:878
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:773
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14218:13865
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:300
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1412
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3738152:0:3
3738205:0:8
3738277:0:1
3738491:0:2
3738543:0:1
3738697:5:12
3738700:0:7
3738840:0:6
3738956:0:1
3739036:2:5
3739052:0:3
3739109:0:2
3739221:0:1
3739255:0:1
3739266:0:3
3739326:0:1
3739388:1:5
3739483:0:10
3739490:0:3
3739617:0:3
3739632:0:1
3739635:0:1
3739636:0:3
3739640:0:2
3739781:0:4
3739792:0:1
3739859:0:4
3739996:0:2
3740053:0:1
3740057:1:2
3740061:0:3
3740085:0:6
3740105:3:6
3740133:0:2
3740134:0:1
3740293:0:1
3740425:0:2
3740508:0:1
3740518:0:4
3740569:0:2
3740677:0:2
3740690:0:9
3740756:0:1
3740817:0:2
3740953:0:2
3741008:0:2
3741074:0:1
3741114:0:1
3741133:0:41
3741528:0:1
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50801Sample 1. 19789 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1088 unique users in 11368 transactions
2. 19637 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 737 unique users in 10750 transactions
3. 18881 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9981 transactions
4. 14973 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8633 transactions
5. 13865 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1215 unique users in 4966 transactions
6. 12736 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 699 unique users in 8498 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11369 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 561 unique users in 4389 transactions
9. 11304 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 486 unique users in 6323 transactions
10. 11235 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 649 unique users in 6435 transactions
11. 11129 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 595 unique users in 6479 transactions
12. 10534 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 497 unique users in 5533 transactions
13. 10155 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 570 unique users in 5801 transactions
14. 9633 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 328 unique users in 4938 transactions
15. 9396 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 625 unique users in 5069 transactions
16. 9284 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 334 unique users in 3305 transactions
17. 9225 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 450 unique users in 4598 transactions
18. 9202 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 511 unique users in 4292 transactions
19. 9065 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 386 unique users in 3216 transactions
20. 9060 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 423 unique users in 4910 transactions
21. 9001 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 532 unique users in 4084 transactions
22. 8533 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 527 unique users in 4609 transactions
23. 8511 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4833 transactions
24. 8451 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 451 unique users in 4998 transactions
25. 8397 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 566 unique users in 4924 transactions
26. 8282 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 404 unique users in 884 transactions
27. 8180 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 399 unique users in 4271 transactions
28. 7545 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 452 unique users in 4185 transactions
29. 7543 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4111 transactions
30. 7225 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 571 unique users in 4282 transactions
31. 7127 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 401 unique users in 3636 transactions
32. 6718 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 227 unique users in 1731 transactions
33. 6560 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 370 unique users in 3302 transactions
34. 6535 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 273 unique users in 2961 transactions
35. 6526 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 381 unique users in 3555 transactions
36. 6511 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 932 unique users in 4202 transactions
37. 6363 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 475 unique users in 3539 transactions
38. 6248 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 197 unique users in 3633 transactions
39. 6213 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 620 unique users in 3477 transactions
40. 6140 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 219 unique users in 3591 transactions
41. 6136 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 407 unique users in 3567 transactions
42. 6021 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 520 unique users in 3504 transactions
43. 6012 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2628 transactions
44. 5983 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 226 unique users in 3395 transactions
45. 5980 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 450 unique users in 3354 transactions
46. 5977 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 405 unique users in 3259 transactions
47. 5970 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 324 unique users in 2783 transactions
48. 5725 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 201 unique users in 3292 transactions
49. 5373 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 412 unique users in 2640 transactions
50. 5312 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 440 unique users in 3773 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50752. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50753. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50754. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50755. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50756. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50757. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50758. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50759. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50760. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50761. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50762. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50763. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50764. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50765. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50766. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50767. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50768. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50769. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50770. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50771. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50772. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50773. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50774. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50775. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50776. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50777. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50778. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50779. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50780. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50781. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50782. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50783. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50784. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50785. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50786. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50787. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50788. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50789. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50790. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50791. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50792. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50793. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50794. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50795. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50796. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50797. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50798. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50799. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50800. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50801. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26488Sample 1. 69945 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 891 unique users in 12430 transactions
2. 66165 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2142 unique users in 28595 transactions
3. 65069 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3305 unique users in 17372 transactions
4. 56894 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3531 unique users in 54717 transactions
5. 56838 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4540 unique users in 32674 transactions
6. 47379 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3612 unique users in 32904 transactions
7. 43024 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2798 unique users in 15164 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 36997 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2494 unique users in 13725 transactions
10. 36706 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2817 unique users in 29725 transactions
11. 33417 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1567 unique users in 13641 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 31491 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1448 unique users in 10194 transactions
14. 28599 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2070 unique users in 10236 transactions
15. 27598 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1672 unique users in 6541 transactions
16. 27491 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1390 unique users in 7075 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 22406 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1356 unique users in 9353 transactions
21. 21322 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6403 transactions
22. 15933 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1929 unique users in 6461 transactions
23. 15648 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 734 unique users in 5769 transactions
24. 15520 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1700 unique users in 7213 transactions
25. 15192 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1666 unique users in 3796 transactions
26. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
27. 14648 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1146 unique users in 8790 transactions
28. 14589 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 528 unique users in 6828 transactions
29. 14218 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1101 unique users in 1742 transactions
30. 14064 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1280 unique users in 8012 transactions
31. 13557 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1593 unique users in 6942 transactions
32. 13019 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 655 unique users in 3577 transactions
33. 12886 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2962 unique users in 6819 transactions
34. 12876 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1325 unique users in 7231 transactions
35. 12807 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1302 unique users in 5814 transactions
36. 12649 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1112 unique users in 7679 transactions
37. 12567 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 817 unique users in 4175 transactions
38. 12394 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 808 unique users in 5920 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 10701 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1129 unique users in 5992 transactions
41. 10471 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 540 unique users in 3939 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8064 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1025 unique users in 3494 transactions
45. 8045 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3288 transactions
46. 7843 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 741 unique users in 6951 transactions
47. 7737 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 930 unique users in 3403 transactions
48. 7643 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 566 unique users in 6708 transactions
49. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
50. 7037 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 487 unique users in 5543 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26439. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26440. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26441. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26442. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26443. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26444. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26445. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26446. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26447. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26448. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26449. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26450. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26451. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26452. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26453. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26454. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26455. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26456. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26457. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26458. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26459. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26460. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26461. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26462. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26463. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26464. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26465. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26466. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26467. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26468. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26469. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26470. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26471. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26472. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26473. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26474. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26475. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26476. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26477. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26478. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26479. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26480. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26481. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26482. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26483. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26484. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26485. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26486. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26487. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26488. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 319278 (14.35%)
Tuesday 317283 (14.26%)
Wednesday 318466 (14.31%)
Thursday 339900 (15.27%)
Friday 337200 (15.15%)
Saturday 294329 (13.23%)
Sunday 298059 (13.39%)
Total: 2224515
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
39. Post 66278147 (unedited backup) (by SilverCryptoBullet) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 14:24:49 CET 2026) in Nation-States hunting for SEEDs?:
There is one major distinction between custodial and non custodial services.
Custodial vs. Non Custodial Wallets - "Not your keys, not your coin" Explained.If you forget or don't make backups of your private key information and the software where those keys are stored malfunctions, you are done. You lose access to your coins and you will never get them back.
With high risk of losing your coins if you only create a single wallet for storage, without backup, when people know that risk, they must learn and practice both wallet backups and wallet recoveries.
How to back up a seed phrase?Custodial services are controlled by someone else, and you can lose access to them. If you do, there will be a way back in, by proving to the custodian that you are who you say you are. That can be as simple as resetting a password over e-mail, entering a code sent to you via SMS, or doing (another round of) KYC to verify yourself. After that, the custodian can give you access to your bitcoin again.
Lazy people can feel it is safe as they can recover their account from password to 2FA, but there is bigger risk than non-custodial wallets. Centralized exchanges can close their service as scam, their exchanges can be seized like TradeOrge exchange or their exchanges can be hacked and bankrupted after that.
Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts.
40. Post 66277965 (unedited backup) (by Eternad) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 13:33:07 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
Have you ever played at SneakySlots this provider is a little too unfamiliar to me because I only found out after the development of X Punkz which was just announced, and this provider only has 3 games available.
First I though that Punkz only added those three games by SneakySlots, neglecting the rest of their portfolio for a reason. But, judging by its
website, it really seems like that company has only created those three games. They have announced two upcoming games, though. Gods go Pew Pew, to be released at the end of January and Unwishable, scheduled for 25 February. I am sure Punkz will add those eventually to its casino catalogue.
I was intrigued when saw that game provider but I don’t dare to try new provider after experiencing a terrible loss on Shadylady slot game provider which is new to me.
I was attracted to a gore like theme of most of their slot games but it’s brutal experience since it’s so hard to hit any win even a medium size win on a bonus buy.
Anyone here manage to try a bonus buy on that slot games? I still doesn’t check the games.
41. Post 66276631 (unedited backup) (by JiiBs) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 00:33:49 CET 2026) in What's the biggest real security mistakes non technical bitcoiners still make?:
I think it's a combination of a few things, not just one.
Making digital backups like photos of your seed and storing them on your phone, cloud and/or email is one mistake. If that image gets in the wrong hands, it's goodbye to your bitcoin.
Downloading fake wallets because they saw a recommendation somewhere on Telegram, FB, or a different social media, without researching what they are downloading.
These are the very common ones that I think, anyone who comes into this space for the first time without any proper orientation would make. It always carries in it a sense of safety, safety in the fact that the device you are handling is yours and for those that stores data on the clouds, they trust too much on these for systems for backup and feels it’s easy to have these data recovered.
Some might even message themselves on social media as a way to back that up give it’s 2-way protection policy and you wonder how your message gets leaked in an investigation…
These are very unreliable and can at the least unexpected time constitute a security breach that one might not get to recover from.
42. Post 66276603 (unedited backup) (by ptaylor78) (scraped on Sat Jan 10 00:25:55 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
Bitz Casino claims to possess a Curacao Master License and that it's owned and operated by Win Sector N.V. If you visit the official website of the alleged owners, there isn't much information there.
Raj.Bet is similar to Bitz in that you can't find license information on their website. Both casinos claim to be owned by Win Sector N.V.
If you try to authenticate the two websites to check if their licenses are valid via
https://www.curacao-egaming.com/public-and-players/authenticity, the result is "Unlicensed."
And while we're at it, Bitz_Casino, since you've popped back into the forum, do you mind to also explain about your license and why doesn't any seal of validation being displayed [and assured the players of your casino] on your site?
Separately, we want to inform you that we are currently obtaining a new license from the island of Anjuan, and there will be an update on the website in the next few weeks. We will inform you separately when the license is updated on the website, and we will celebrate this event together.
But you're still under GC until July? If you are, I think it'll be best to still put their seal of validation on your site. If you're not, then it'll be best to scrap any claim of being under GC altogether for the time being.
--
Bitz_Casino:
Based on the above, there appear to have been unresolved issues in the past regarding verification of your licensing status while operating under a Curaçao license. Do you mind kindly explaining your current license.
Your website states that Bitz.io is licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros, under License No. ALSI-202411066-F12. However, unlike other operators holding valid Anjouan licenses such as BC.Game, no official license seal or verification badge is displayed on your site to allow players to independently confirm this status.
In addition, the Anjouan Gaming License Register appears to show this license as expired as of November 21, 2025. Please clarify whether this information is accurate, and if not, provide confirmation of your current licensing status and its validity.
Clear confirmation would be helpful for transparency and player assurance.
43. Post 66276492 (unedited backup) (by Amphenomenon) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 23:54:19 CET 2026) in What's the biggest real security mistakes non technical bitcoiners still make?:
Acting before thinking and asking questions is another common mistake. You will hear about cases where victims got a message and were tricked to import their seed phrase or download an updated piece of software. They do, they lose their crypto, and then they start asking if that was the right thing to do.
This is one easy way for one to fall into social engineering attacks sadly especially when such individual is communication with an account that can be link to his/her identity/location. The ironic fact that anyone can fall into this if they are not cautious, after all the scammer doesn't come to scam first but rather gain trust and then one is vulnerable to their schemes and attack.
Unwilling to learn technical side, they often prefer to store their Bitcoin in centralized wallets.
They lack the opportunity to perform even basic technical tasks, such as sending Bitcoin on-chain, which requires manual setups to get the best network fees.
Technicality are not necessary in coin protection basically. The on-chain transaction is something also in the CEX, and sometimes I consider theirs more complex since it has different options.
Wallets like Bluewallets gives users simple understanding, there is the send and receive with other options to increase fee or replace fee and even if they don't bother about that, it still gives good fee estimation, not like CEX or some said non-custodial wallets like Trust wallet.
Knowledge can even be overridden by carelessness, leading to major mistakes. This isn't just about a Bitcoiner's background. I remember the news a few months ago where a crypto developer's wallet was drained.
One thing I have come to notice about such scams on technical individuals is that this is often through social engineering attacks or carelessness.
44. Post 66275895 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 21:21:43 CET 2026) in Nation-States hunting for SEEDs?:
You should always carefully check every output addresses before you sign a transaction with your hardware signing device. For this very reason it's mandatory that your signing device has an own independant display that can't be manipulated by the software wallet that hands over the transaction to be signed.
I only recently
found out there's a thing called "blind signing" for shitcoins like Ethereum. Instead of confirming each address on your screen, you have to tell your hardware wallet to just trust the software again. So that's how people got all their coins stolen from their hardware wallet.
Correct, but also quite wrong -- this is not the primary reason why people are losing their coins, not even close. What blind signing does is abstract away some of the details, but the primary culprit is interacting with malicious and phishing contracts. Do you really think that the average user would be able to interpret the calls when doing an interaction even if they were hidden? Absolutely not. Those that can drain everything that you have because most of these shitcoins have token standards that do not have native ownership. Even if wallets had complete clear signing, this would still not prevent most of these cases of scamming. What is the difference between a legitimate contract and fraudulent contract that requires you to approve unlimited allowance for USDC and similar actions (say deposit/stake)? Nothing, the average user would never be able to tell even if all ABI information was displayed for every contract (it never will be).
What they do over there is generally terrible, but let's be clear about the real causes of things. The best type of attack that shows how shitcoins are stupid is the one where a single signing drains all of your balances across every chain of the same type and all of their layers
from a hardware wallet, for example EVM based chains.
I had a friend buy some Bitcoin and kept stressing the importance of security to him. Hardware wallets weren’t really popular yet at the time, so I suggested he install the Bitpie app on a dedicated phone and set a very strong wallet password. Unfortunately, he later forgot the password, and those two Bitcoins have been stuck there ever since, unable to be moved.
I have never heard of Bitpie or know anyone that has used it. By the sound of it, it looks like a custodial service. Is it? Did your friend not generate a seed phrase or received private keys to the addresses where he sent his bitcoin? Wallet passwords are meant to encrypt files locally, so that if an unauthorized third-party got hold of them, they couldn't abuse them. But you should always be able to recover your wallet elsewhere using a recovery phrase or individual private keys.
Custodial services suck, but in terms of user failures in this case there is nothing different between a custodial or non custodial wallet. A proper failure to to store key information (which differs between wallet types) and then forgetting it will lead to a loss of coin or coin being stuck in both cases.
Bad, but this is nothing compared to the number of systems activated by these or similar tools. It is in the hundreds of millions of devices. Of course some malicious actors will jump on the opportunity, still the data shows that it represents a small amount of devices that actually have a malicious activator. The amount stolen would be much higher otherwise. Anyway there is no reason to use Windows at all, and if someone does need it they can install it in a virtual machine without a network adapter. That way it is not going to be a problem even if you put a malware-infested copy of Windows on it. The exception would be malware that targets the VM but average users commonly don't stumble upon that.
But the simple fact that it's an activator, which can be hosted by any site, without any provenance, closed source code, and so on, is all unfavorable signs that you shouldn't install it on a PC with an unactivated Windows, because what are the chances of not having something very unpleasant there?
The simple fact that it's not open source and that there's no official team behind it already makes me want to stay away from this kind of thing. It's true that just not using Windows eliminates these problems, but if there's no other way, for example, having a pc for work to run things that only work on Windows-compatible software, the best thing is not to tempt fate and acquire a license.
Correct, but wrong. Pretty much all cracking is closed source on average, this includes everything from software to video games for Windows. If you download it from suspicious sources, then you may get in trouble. If you download it from legitimate sources and authors, you will be fine. The percentage of users that get malware this way is very tiny compared to the users that successfully use things. Yes, it would be better if it were open source -- but this is the realistic state of things. Activators should not be singled out, people who use activators are likely using other software or games that are cracked too. Anyway, if I recall correctly there was once an open source activator for Windows 10 but I don't know if it that is still a thing.
Besides, nowadays computers already come with pre-activated OEM Windows licenses...
If you buy a pre-built computer or a laptop maybe, but that is for the amateurs.
45. Post 66275351 (unedited backup) (by Cryptomultiplier) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 18:53:19 CET 2026) in Nation-States hunting for SEEDs?:
I don't think that's your standard clipboard hijacker. His clipboard wasn't hijacked in the normal fashion. He copied the correct address from his Trezor and pasted it into his Binance account. The correct address was also confirmed on the hardware wallet. Only after the transaction was sent from Binance do we see that it got sent to a different address.
This is something else and maybe a combination of a few things. Fake Trezor software or firmware, fake Binance exchange, a malicious browser, script, or extension that replaces crypto addresses in the background, or something like that. He did something very wrong to catch that nasty thing.
Yeah, it could be a combination of several factors. It's more likely that he downloaded cracked software or a game, and that same installer may have downloaded several other malware programs through malicious ddls to increase its success. This means that if you identify a clipboard hijacker on your machine, it should be considered a red flag, as it's very likely that its malicious code may be downloading several members of the same family of highly undetectable malware.
For Bitcoin, yes, one can keep it offline or an airgapped device, etc, but what about people storing altcoins and especially the stable coins in Unstoppable or Trust Wallet (I don't recommend this wallet), etc ? Does this mean that we are at risk if we keep our coins in the Unstoppable wallet ?
Also they do not have any desktop version, so what are our options for altcoins storage
There's always the risk of your online machine being compromised by an infostealer that can scan your machine in seconds. Malwares is increasingly using encryption techniques to remain undetectable by antivirus software. So you never know if your device is infected.
A hardware wallet like Trezor is considered a "secure" device because the private keys are stored on the device's chip and transactions are signed in the device's isolated environment, invalidating any malware from acting there (to date, I haven't heard of any malware obtaining private keys from such a device). Besides supporting various altcoins, you can use it on your Android/iOS device (depending on the model, like Safe 7).
I prefer airgapped wallets like Passport, Coldcard or Krux (for Bitcoin), but for those who want to store altcoins, the best alternative is Trezor.
For more information about multicoin wallets, visit this thread:
list Multicoin Open Source WalletsBesides using an air gapped wallet, an investor can decide to protect themselves by using some strategies like evacuating hot seed phrases that has been typed on your device and stored on a cloud backup by creating a new wallet and move holdings there.
Use lockdown mode for iPhone users , disable cloud backup or iCloud sync to remain safe and lastly never leave or take screenshots or photos of your seed phrase and store on your device.
46. Post 66275080 (unedited backup) (by ptaylor78) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 17:41:50 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
Bitz shouldn't have allowed a US player to gamble on their online casino. That's my opinion. But the US player should also not have been at the website at all. It was the player's responsibility to make sure of that. Since you inspected their terms in detail, you couldn't have missed point 3.4. that goes hand-in-hand with 3.3. I have already shared my feelings about Responsible Gambling guidelines and how ineffective and silly I think they are.
I am sorry, but my opinion hasn't changed. If you had won and Bitz refused to pay you your winnings because they didn't want to, I would have supported you and you would have me in your corner. However, that isn't the case here. You were looking for a specific service. That service was online gambling. You found what you were looking for in Bitz. They offered you the service to gamble online. You gambled and, sadly, you lost. That's it.
What you’re advocating is the functional equivalent of jury nullification.
You’re discarding the governing terms and substituting your personal beliefs about what “should” matter. No mediator, regulator, or court evaluates disputes that way. They apply the rules as written to the facts as established. Personal ideology is irrelevant.
Pointing to alleged U.S. ineligibility doesn’t change that analysis. A term that the operator itself applies inconsistently or ignores does not excuse separate, affirmative violations of other written obligations. One breach does not nullify all others.
That approach might be tolerated in forum debate. It has zero value in any process that actually resolves disputes.
For the second time, I’m not here for sympathy, concern, or life advice from an internet forum "legend". Everything is fine on my end. The issue is compliance with written obligations. Nothing else.
47. Post 66273780 (unedited backup) (by DubemIfedigbo001) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 10:46:43 CET 2026) in Nation-States hunting for SEEDs?:
If you have a separate machine only for your financial needs and operations and you use it properly, it won't get infected with malware and crypto address hijackers. You wouldn't be interacting with anything that can cause that. Worst case scenario, such malware infects your day-to-day computer and unless the malware can spread all over your network and connected devices (unlikely), the most important machine stays safe.
What I see being little disclosed, but the risk is imminent, is when thousands download Windows activators/crackers. These are downloaded from random, unverifiable websites, such as KMSpico (activator software).
There have been mentions that they may be full of malware designed to steal cryptocurrencies and banking data...
Imagine how many people have activated their Windows/office using cracked software and are using wallets on these activated Windows systems, and are at risk right now?
There is even a bigger risk which is that people download that software to be installed before crack from third-party cracked software providers like
getintopc and it is obvious compromised software gets into their Pcs. They now crack with the KMSpico and the damage continues.
Furthermore, less tech-savvy people do not actually download their software themselves but rely on the services of the computer engineer to install his own software for them which may be compromised. Most of the engineers copy software from their peers and install for their clients, including operating systems, so if a compromised software enters a location of PC engineers, it has the ability to spread quicker and attack a wide range of clients who patronize them.
48. Post 66273661 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 10:04:13 CET 2026) in Novosti:
To mi više izgleda kao 2 blockchain potvrde. Prva je bila u 8:15, druga a možda i treća u 8:35. Ne znam šta im ta budalaština o 24 blockchain potvrde treba da znači dok u isto vrijeme iznad toga pišu da se zamjena kripta očekuje u periodu od 5 do 30 minuta. Ne može i jedno i drugo. Moguće da se to odnosi na ether i Ethereum tokene pa su nešto iskomplikovali ili pišu isto za sve mreže bez obzira kakav je 'block time'. Uglavnom bitno je da je prošlo.
Bilo bi zanimljivo sad vidjeti kakav je risk rejting tog ethera kojeg si dobio. BTC kojeg si njima poslao je imao medium-risk i coini potiču iz eXch, jel?
Iskreno, nemam pojma odakle sve potječe BTC koji sam im slao jer sam istu adresu koristio nekoliko godina. eXch nisam koristio tako da mislim da od tamo nemam ništa direktno. Jedino ako je nešto neizravno završilo u mom walletu. Kod mene su bili kojekakvi ordinalsi, BTC iz prošlih kampanja... Ma stvarno svašta. Na onom AML botu je rezultat bio 53% medium risk level ali ima tu svega:
🟧🟧🟧 Medium risk level 53.29%
🟢 Trusted sources:
Miner: 0.82%
Payment: 0.37%
Other: 10.45%
Exchange Licensed: 74.35%
🟠 Suspicious sources:
ATM: 0.48%
Liquidity Pools: 0.38%
Exchange Unlicensed: 0.63%
P2P Exchange Unlicensed: 0.21%
🔴 Dangerous sources:
Dark Market: 0.20%
Illegal Service: 0.01%
Mixer: 4.16%
Scam: 0.01%
Gambling: 7.85%
Ransom: 0.03%
Stolen Coins: 0.01%
Sanctions: 0.03%
Kako da provjerim ETH koji sam dobio? Otvorio sam novi ETH wallet koji nije povezan s niti jednim drugim mojim walletom (nema nikakvih prethodnih transakcija na njemu).
Najverovatnije je u pitanju maksimalan broj potvrda koje neke transakcije zahtevaju. To se uglavnom odnosi na ETH i tokene na toj mrezi. Mada tih 24 potvrde na ETH mrezi znaju biti mnogo brze nego dve na blockchainu.
Slicna stvar je i na Binance, s tim sto mislim da je tamo potrebno preko 50 potvrda za depozit da bi rasoplagao sredstvima.
Ma da. Meni se isto čini da im to po defaultu piše bez obzira na kojoj mreži se rade transakcije. Za Ethereum su mi 24 potvrde OK ali za Bitcoin nisam nikad čuo da netko traži toliko. Zato sam i išao to ovdje napisati, a kad ono ipak nije tako
49. Post 66273635 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 09:56:20 CET 2026) in Novosti:
EDIT: Evo ipak se moram ispraviti. Nisam siguran što im znači ta informacija o 24 potvrde jer je meni swap odrađen puno prije. U 8:15 je potvrđena BTC transakcija, a ETH sam u wallet dobio u 8:35. Ne znam je li nekome bitno, ali ETH koji sam dobio je došao iz walleta KuCoin mjenjačnice.
To mi više izgleda kao 2 blockchain potvrde. Prva je bila u 8:15, druga a možda i treća u 8:35. Ne znam šta im ta budalaština o 24 blockchain potvrde treba da znači dok u isto vrijeme iznad toga pišu da se zamjena kripta očekuje u periodu od 5 do 30 minuta. Ne može i jedno i drugo. Moguće da se to odnosi na ether i Ethereum tokene pa su nešto iskomplikovali ili pišu isto za sve mreže bez obzira kakav je 'block time'. Uglavnom bitno je da je prošlo.
Bilo bi zanimljivo sad vidjeti kakav je risk rejting tog ethera kojeg si dobio. BTC kojeg si njima poslao je imao medium-risk i coini potiču iz eXch, jel?
Najverovatnije je u pitanju maksimalan broj potvrda koje neke transakcije zahtevaju. To se uglavnom odnosi na ETH i tokene na toj mrezi. Mada tih 24 potvrde na ETH mrezi znaju biti mnogo brze nego dve na blockchainu.
Slicna stvar je i na Binance, s tim sto mislim da je tamo potrebno preko 50 potvrda za depozit da bi rasoplagao sredstvima.
50. Post 66273399 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 08:05:19 CET 2026) in Novosti:
Nikad nisam čuo da neko za bitcoin transkacije traži 24 potvrde i prosto ne vjerujem. Jel moguće da ta osoba s kojom si pričao nije nešto pogrešno shvatila ili ti dala informaciju za neku drugu kriptovalutu? Kad započnem proces zamjene BTC u USDT npr, na dnu stranice mi piše da je očekivano vrijeme swap-a 5-30 minuta. 24 potvrde na Bitcoin blockchainu je prosječno čekanje od 4 sata. To je nenormalno skroz.
Btw, Swapuz nije DEX. To je CEX i instant mjenačnica.
Ne, ne. Nisi me dobro shvatio. Nisam pričao s osobom koja mi je rekla da su potrebne 24 potvrde. Koristio sam Swapuz i tražilo je 24 potvrde da bi napravili zamjenu i poslali mi ETH. Evo, jutros sam ponovo pokrenuo swap i evo screenshota:
Isprva nisam to niti primijetio. Ali onda kad je transakcija bila potvrđena, a ETH mi nije dolazio u wallet, išao sam provjeriti i vidio da piše "Number of blockchain confirmations 24". Meni je isto nevjerojatno pa sam htio podijeliti s vama da računate s tim ako ćete koristiti Swapuz.
51. Post 66273182 (unedited backup) (by nc50lc) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 05:39:43 CET 2026) in How to make a bitcoin transaction and pay less than 1 sat/vByte:
-snip-
Are you saying that I should mention something in my OP about the
Use SSL option and how it should be ticked for network changes to be recorded properly? I could add that somewhere in the tutorial.
Or perhaps you were trying to say that it should have been noted by Blue Wallet in the network settings tab?
Something like: '
Make sure that "Use SSL" is ticked' should be enough.
It's switched-on by default, but in cases like what happened to "
@Not your key not your BTC", the note should prevent it.
52. Post 66273035 (unedited backup) (by impulse709) (scraped on Fri Jan 9 03:28:37 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
If you like sports and know how to bet on them, that's a good idea.
What were you playing before that you didn't have any luck with? You could try Dice or Plinko. I have seen players trigger big multipliers on crash games like Aviator or one of the alternatives created by competing game providers.
When it comes to betting on slot games, the first thing that comes to mind is crash games. Because this is where I work best. Sometimes I focus on Dice or Plinko, but the plan doesn't work properly. But your idea is very good, because sometimes we should think of exceptions. But I never worry about rakeback. I use a very small amount of money to bet, so as not to lose too much. As he has experience towards sports games,So he should give his time there.
Racial games such as Aviator may be challenging, however, those huge multipliers are alluring. Dice and Plinko are better alternatives when you have less time and need to have something less risky. I appreciate the fact that you bet little at a time- this makes the losses easily manageable as well as makes the game enjoyable. And, of course, when a person has an experience of sports betting, it is logical to concentrate there. Occasionally it is best to be safe and secure, and to venture a little on the side.
53. Post 66271529 (unedited backup) (by ptaylor78) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 18:17:37 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
@ptaylor78
Another thing I noticed when I took a look at your Casino Guru thread. In the summary, CG states that you are a "player from the United States." Is that true?
Have you checked what the casino's terms state regarding players who are residents in certain territories, including the United States of America? It's under 3.3 in the terms and conditions.
Hi
Pmalek:
It’s interesting that you are now selectively citing Bitz’s Terms of Service and pointing to provisions you believe have full force and effect in this dispute.
You reference Section 3.3 regarding restricted territories. Yet throughout this entire thread, you have consistently refused to give any weight at all to Section 6.8 of the same TOS and Bitz’s now-deleted Self-Exclusion Policy (
https://bitz.io/self-policy). Apparently, in your view, some sections of the TOS matter and others do not.
That inconsistency aside, I anticipated you would raise Section 3.3. After Bitz refused my self-exclusion request and still before any deposits were made, I sought an independent basis to have my account closed. I explicitly informed Bitz that I was a United States resident and quoted the very language from Section 3.3 you now rely on. Under their own terms, my account should have been blocked immediately.
Bitz refused. They stated that the account could not be blocked until the self-exclusion tool “under maintenance” was repaired and a seven-day self-exclusion period had elapsed. In other words, even when presented with a clear territorial prohibition under their own TOS, they still declined to act. Now ask yourself why a casino would claim a self-exclusion tool was required to block an account from a restricted territory. You can decide whether that explanation reflects a legitimate constraint or clear bad faith.
It gets worse. On December 15, Bitz support, through the same representative involved elsewhere in this matter, claimed that players could play from any country, with the caveat that there “may be issues loading games or the website.” That position directly contradicts Section 3.3 and further demonstrates how casually Bitz treated its own rules.
So now that you’ve decided to engage with the TOS, perhaps you can explain how refusing to honor a self-exclusion request citing gambling addiction, refusing to close an account for a prohibited-country resident, and continuing to accept deposits complies with Bitz’s published terms.
You won’t be able to. That’s why your arguments keep pivoting to personal responsibility while avoiding operator obligations entirely.
You’ve seen only a fraction of the evidence documenting Bitz’s conduct beginning December 7. I have no obligation to convince you of anything. But when you thought you had found a clever angle by raising U.S. residency, it was necessary to correct the record once again.
Screenshots attached for clarity.
54. Post 66270894 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 15:44:08 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
@ptaylor78
If you truly are a gambling addict, then I am sorry for you and those close to you. And yes, the "personal-responsibility rhetoric" still applies to you. It's your fault that you are addicted. It's not mine, Bitz's, or the world's. If I didn't say it earlier, then I am going to say it now: Go seek professional help before you destroy yourself and the lives of people that depend on you. That's also your personal responsibility, not someone else's. I don't think you should be in control of your own finances if you can't make sound decisions. The best thing that could happen to you is if someone gave you an allowance, enough to provide you with everything you need in life, but not an amount that you can gamble away and destroy your future and that of your loved ones. That's all assuming that you aren't capable of making normal decisions yourself.
I read up some cases about some of gamblers try to exploit the self exclusion policy of the casino and they try to exploit it by asking compensation especially if the casino forget to impose the request of those gamblers.
I don't want to accuse him trying to do that, but it seems that's what's happening especially seeing his actions done here.
But if we really think about the situation he is the one to be blame on those actions he have done. So if he don't have any hidden agenda with those issues he raised here, much better if he moves on and just find other things that can make him busy then stay away on gambling.
55. Post 66270884 (unedited backup) (by ptaylor78) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 15:41:49 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
@ptaylor78
If you truly are a gambling addict, then I am sorry for you and those close to you. And yes, the "personal-responsibility rhetoric" still applies to you. It's your fault that you are addicted. It's not mine, Bitz's, or the world's. If I didn't say it earlier, then I am going to say it now: Go seek professional help before you destroy yourself and the lives of people that depend on you. That's also your personal responsibility, not someone else's. I don't think you should be in control of your own finances if you can't make sound decisions. The best thing that could happen to you is if someone gave you an allowance, enough to provide you with everything you need in life, but not an amount that you can gamble away and destroy your future and that of your loved ones. That's all assuming that you aren't capable of making normal decisions yourself.
I’m not here to solicit or accept life advice from strangers on forum.
Responsible gambling exists precisely because personal responsibility alone is not sufficient. That is why reputable casinos provide tools like limits, timeouts, and self-exclusion, and why they bind themselves to honor those requests once made. Those tools are not charity. They are contractual obligations Bitz chose to publish, advertise, and enforce against players.
Bitz failed on every front. I disclosed addiction. I requested self-exclusion. They acknowledged it and refused to act while continuing to accept deposits. That is operator misconduct under their own terms. Your fixation on “personal responsibility” ignores the equally real concept of operator responsibility and the written obligations Bitz voluntarily assumed.
What’s striking is how some people like you treat responsible gaming provisions as optional or second-class, while insisting every other term. KYC, AML, country restrictions, bonus rules, wagering limits. be enforced to the letter. Contracts do not work that way. Every term carries equal force. Casinos do not get to cherry-pick compliance based on ideology.
It’s difficult not to respond when people continue to spout misinformation, as you have, but at this point it’s no longer productive. The complaint is progressing through the appropriate channels.
Bitz had a duty to provide the responsible gaming safeguards it advertised and incorporated into its terms. That is the issue. I have no duty to convince you of anything, especially when you insist on ignoring the factual record and the governing terms.
You’re entitled to your views on addiction. They are irrelevant to whether Bitz complied with its own TOS and self-exclusion policy. This dispute is about conduct and compliance, not sermons.
56. Post 66269862 (unedited backup) (by nc50lc) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 10:27:55 CET 2026) in How to make a bitcoin transaction and pay less than 1 sat/vByte:
I don't remember having to click on "Use SSL" when I tested this on my own setup back when I was writing this thread. Maybe it was already turned on from before or the software did it by itself after a restart. I also don't remember seeing error messages.
I see what happened here:
He must have disabled that "
Use SSL" switch beforehand that's why he had to enable it when he followed your instructions.
On the other hand (
at your end), since it should be switched-on by default,
You don't remember having to tick that settings and your test worked right away.
57. Post 66269822 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 10:17:26 CET 2026) in Novosti:
I Trezor i svaka druga kompanija vezana ili ne vezana za kriptovalute može imati curenje podataka, i mnoge su imale. I Trezor je imao neki leak u prošlosti ali u dosta manjem obimu.
Znam da mogu imati curenje podataka i vjerujem da su neke imale. Ali u zadnje vrijeme za Ledger čujem samo vezano uz nekakve probleme tako da sam odlučio zaobilaziti ih u širokom luku.
Trezor One je postojao već par godina kad je Ledger počeo da prodaje Nano S. Trezor Model One je prvi i najstariji hardverski novčanik.
Vidiš, to nisam znao. Zapravo, moguće da sam tada (negdje 2018. godine) znao za Trezor ali koliko se sjećam Ledger je tada bio dosta popularan pa sam se vjerojatno zbog toga odlučio na kupnju Nano S uređaja.
58. Post 66269784 (unedited backup) (by ptaylor78) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 10:01:37 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
@ptaylor78
In essence: You created an account at Bitz Casino, reviewed their Self-Exclusion Policy, found that it wasn't to your liking, and decided to gamble there anyways. Would you say that is a very brief, one-sentence explanation of your case?
To me it seems like that was a very calculated and intentional move on your part. You might have done things like that in the past, someone advised you to do it, or you figured it out in some other way. You are not dumb, you know what you are doing. If you won, there would have been no complaints, and Bitz would have been an wonderful casino. Since you lost, you now want to change the past, and get your money back.
I learned early on that when someone starts a rebuttal with “in essence,” what follows is usually fiction. You’ve confirmed that rule nicely.
I won’t bother reposting all the exhibits that corroborate my positions. They are already in the record. Your speculation adds nothing.
Your summary is wrong at every material point. On December 8, before a single penny was deposited or a single bet was placed, I disclosed gambling addiction and requested self-exclusion. Bitz acknowledged the request and then refused to implement it while continuing to accept deposits. Unless you can explain how Bitz's December 8 refusal to self-exclude complies with its own Terms of Service and Self-Exclusion Policy, everything else you’ve written is irrelevant.
For completeness, explain why the same Bitz support representative, Jessy, gave materially different answers on self-exclusion on December 15 and again today, January 8. That inconsistency further undercuts your narrative.
If self-exclusion was available via email, as Jessy states on January 8, why was my email request denied on December 8. And why did Jessy state on December 15 that self-exclusion by email was not possible.
Now that the “calculated gamble” theory is dead on the timeline alone, feel free to resume the personal-responsibility rhetoric. It still won’t change the facts or the obligations Bitz chose to publish and ignore.
Just for the record, I don’t expect a substantive response to any of the issues raised. Your pattern is consistent. You post assertions without evidence, disappear once they’re debunked, then reappear days later to repeat a new version of the same unsupported narrative.
At this point, it’s noise, not analysis.
59. Post 66269526 (unedited backup) (by Cointxz) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 08:07:01 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
If you like sports and know how to bet on them, that's a good idea.
What were you playing before that you didn't have any luck with? You could try Dice or Plinko. I have seen players trigger big multipliers on crash games like Aviator or one of the alternatives created by competing game providers.
I play slot games from Play'Ngo provider Tome of Madness well, usually this game is very friendly especially if we new user at the casino but somehow here I'm not lucky even after 2 deposits
Anyway, I will try to play again in the near future. Dice or Plinko is not my favorite game and I play it only for wagering or chase new VIP levels. For sports yeah I know and often bets on big matches it's just that my ritual is to play slot games before moving on to Sports
by the way thanks for the advice
I missed Play’n Go games especially the one that you mentioned and Rise of Olympus franchise. I frequently play that on livecasino due to its animation effects are satisfying to watch.
This slot provider games give frequent small to medium which I like compared to high volatile game provider.
It’s just sad that it suddenly restrict my country on accessing this provider. Nice choice of slot game.
60. Post 66269518 (unedited backup) (by BitcoinHunt3r) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 08:00:43 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
If you like sports and know how to bet on them, that's a good idea.
What were you playing before that you didn't have any luck with? You could try Dice or Plinko. I have seen players trigger big multipliers on crash games like Aviator or one of the alternatives created by competing game providers.
I play slot games from Play'Ngo provider Tome of Madness well, usually this game is very friendly especially if we new user at the casino but somehow here I'm not lucky even after 2 deposits
Anyway, I will try to play again in the near future. Dice or Plinko is not my favorite game and I play it only for wagering or chase new VIP levels. For sports yeah I know and often bets on big matches it's just that my ritual is to play slot games before moving on to Sports
by the way thanks for the advice
61. Post 66269212 (unedited backup) (by Not your key not your BTC) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 03:57:01 CET 2026) in How to make a bitcoin transaction and pay less than 1 sat/vByte:
4. You will need to enter a server and port number under "Preferred Server" of one that will relay sub 1 sat/vByte transactions. You can enter electrum.loyce.club or electrum.labrie.ca as those two have been confirmed to work. Enter 50002 as the port number.
You may have to add information to click the
use SSL button, because I got an error when I didn't.
I've succeeded in changing after I clicked the Use SSL button.
I also translated part of your thread on my local board:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5421970.msg66269209#msg66269209
62. Post 66269150 (unedited backup) (by Mr. Magkaisa) (scraped on Thu Jan 8 02:46:31 CET 2026) in NBA free BET - 🏆 100$ Prize BTC 🏆 28/12 Happy New Year event:
We have 6 participants with a score of 9 and 10.. the 5 winners will get 10 USD each.
BUT, no one gets the 50USD bonus for the perfect prediction, I will make all 6 partcipants with more than 8points winners!
Pls post your BTC address, prizes will be sent within 5 days.
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
@Harkorede = 10 (1280)
@VashaUdacha777 = 10 (1320)
@vivekdhyani1 = 9(1333)
@albizon = 9 (1338)
@Pmalek = 9 (1311)
@Ochan_yazo_tochant = 9 (1225)
@xlays = 8
@bitzizzix = 8
@Russlenat = 8
@Yoona_As = 8
@julerz12 = 8
@Cryptmuster = 8
@BabyBird = 8
@bisdak40 = 8
@vplus006 = 8
@Improved = 7
@vanesha = 7
@Dr.Osh = 7
@Woodie = 6
@f150 = 6
@LokhcfyBit = 6
@ypoTonic = 6
@Odenleva09 = 6
@UserU = 6
@Porfirii = 3
@xandry = 1
Prizes sent
Thank you for joining guys.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/cce70c9b46138636613faaa57c9d59a5b50ac8feb48049c547c3f3f7f10d3b84@Ochan_yazo_tochant
Pls send you BTC address, thanks
63. Post 66268801 (unedited backup) (by Yamifoud) (scraped on Wed Jan 7 23:39:01 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
Bitz has always run a bit slower than other casino sites in my experience. It takes a bit time to get used to it but afterwards it's fine.
The site was also slow when i tried to use my smartphone, it's so slow in loading the casino features as i have to wait up to 30 seconds and above before a feature i click on will open. I missed out on a game i was trying to place a live bet on simply because of how slow it took for the live bet interface to appear. Well, i find it faster while using a PC, every feature i click on opens instantly unlike the challenges i was facing while using a mobile browser so for now i can only use Bitz when am with my PC at home because i can't endure the annoying time i waste while trying to wait for a page to load when using a smartphone.
It happens that the mobile can't manage to run the system faster for some reason.
-hardware specs
-graphic processing
-not fit for mobile phones
I know many of us encountered the same story, not just in BITZ.io. That is why it is advisable to use higher-spec phones if we want to. Otherwise, use a computer for a better experience and faster game loading. Aside from that, the wider screen helps us avoid wrong bets that usually happen on mobile phones.
64. Post 66268654 (unedited backup) (by Richbased) (scraped on Wed Jan 7 22:50:19 CET 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
Bitz has always run a bit slower than other casino sites in my experience. It takes a bit time to get used to it but afterwards it's fine.
The site was also slow when i tried to use my smartphone, it's so slow in loading the casino features as i have to wait up to 30 seconds and above before a feature i click on will open. I missed out on a game i was trying to place a live bet on simply because of how slow it took for the live bet interface to appear. Well, i find it faster while using a PC, every feature i click on opens instantly unlike the challenges i was facing while using a mobile browser so for now i can only use Bitz when am with my PC at home because i can't endure the annoying time i waste while trying to wait for a page to load when using a smartphone.
