Hm... Baš me zainteresiralo zašto je dobio negativni Trust i moram priznati da ne vidim razlog. Autor negativnog Trusta je kao referencu stavio prvi post u threadu u kojem zapravo ne vidim gdje to Goba nekoga optužuje da je scammer. Jedino što je u tom threadu napisao je post s njegovim standardnim mišljenjem da je cijela kripto industrija puna scammera. Iako to možda nije potpuna istina, ali činjenica je da u kripto svijetu postoji puno više scammera nego primjerice u svijetu "klasičnih" financija (dionice i slično). Ali po meni zbog toga nije zaslužio negativni Trust jer nije napisao ništa pogrešno ili optužio nekoga bez dokaza.

I agree on this and I already retracted my previous that I made when Sportsbet.io is still on transition since that time they already have no communication and their sister company is on the verge of closing specifically livecasino.io.

I still doesn’t try to play again on sportsbet.io to give a full vouch but trust Trofo to be a professional campaign manager to handle this brand promotion.

Stakes almost appear in all Viral Videos on social media, They do good enough marketing so that Stakes are more known and chosen.
Some casinos also do this marketing by choosing influencers with a lot of followers and then the video goes viral by embedding their casino Watermark.

Like Roobet does that too, but maybe not like stakes.
Roobet is now known as the Sponsor of Chealsea FC Sports Club to become an Official Regional Betting Partner, Sponsor UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship),
Esports and Gaming Creators and most iconic is Snoop Dogg as the Chief Brand Officer for various global promotional campaigns and of course many more.

Slot #: 18
BTC Address: bc1qpzwvre2ynerqxc6nk6ur8zspvdx54qrzwyy7f7

---

Last scraped participants:

USERNAME	SLOT	RANK	REG DATE	POST
......................................	......	....................	................................	.........
knuckey	01	Sr. Member	June 16, 2015	check
Peanutswar	03	Legendary	February 17, 2020	check
internetional	04	Legendary	October 24, 2016	check
DabsPoorVersion	05	Sr. Member	April 01, 2017	check
bakasabo	06	Legendary	January 22, 2018	check
Kelward	07	Hero Member	April 22, 2023	check
GazetaBitcoin	08	Legendary	November 06, 2017	check
Woodie	08	Hero Member	October 18, 2016	check
Real-Duke	09	Legendary	December 22, 2014	check
GIF-JOBS	10	Sr. Member	October 17, 2023	check
Bagiira	11	Sr. Member	November 02, 2017	check
abel1337	12	Legendary	November 01, 2013	check
lovesmayfamilis	13	Legendary	March 28, 2018	check
AakZaki	14	Legendary	May 11, 2016	check
snowpega	15	Hero Member	September 26, 2022	check
viljy	16	Legendary	February 19, 2017	check
mv1986	17	Legendary	February 09, 2014	check
RGBTC	20	Legendary	November 30, 2017	check
Smartprofit	21	Legendary	August 21, 2017	check
inspace	22	Legendary	November 19, 2018	check
DYING_S0UL	23	Legendary	October 27, 2022	check
Tmoonz	24	Hero Member	December 20, 2023	check
Barcode_	25	Hero Member	February 21, 2016	check
bitmover	27	Legendary	December 31, 2017	check
angrybirdy	29	Sr. Member	November 29, 2016	check
Pmalek	31	Legendary	May 05, 2013	check
LogitechMouse	32	Legendary	September 07, 2017	check
jahead	33	Sr. Member	August 03, 2017	check
Hypnotizer	34	Sr. Member	September 01, 2025	check
ovcijisir	35	Legendary	October 30, 2017	check
abuzmaster	37	Copper Member	April 13, 2018	check
klarki_mobile	38	Full Member	September 06, 2025	check
cocadalcan	39	Full Member	February 19, 2024	check
NeuroticFish	40	Legendary	February 24, 2014	check
SatoPrincess	41	Legendary	September 15, 2021	check
MarryWithBTC	42	Full Member	January 22, 2025	check
fruktik	43	Hero Member	October 25, 2017	check
FinneysTrueVision	44	Legendary	October 13, 2018	check
TheButterZone	45	Legendary	June 22, 2012	check
Italian Panic	46	Hero Member	April 14, 2023	check
Improved	47	Member	March 06, 2015	check
xandry	48	Legendary	September 29, 2014	check
oll	49	Full Member	November 09, 2016	check
Cityhunter34	50	Sr. Member	September 07, 2023	check

Available Slots (7): 02, 18, 19, 26, 28, 30, 36

Note:
⚠ Slot 08 has been claimed by GazetaBitcoin and Woodie; the first picker is GazetaBitcoin.

---

Note on the duplicates/first picks: this is just scraped data, not a final decision. The manager can still move or reassign the slots based on their rules. This is just for reference. Also, since it's an automated scrape, sometimes error or bug can happen, just double check it. scraped using telegram bot: @btalkgamesbot

The idea of separating devices makes a lot of sense. If your main device gets infected with malware or you fall for a phishing attack, having a separate device can definitely help protect you. But I still wouldn’t overlook the most important thing — your seed phrase and its backup. Losing access to them could be much worse than having your phone hacked.

Of course, that's what I did. I have a separate device for only my crypto activities which no one touches. I also have another device for my daily online activities like gambling and surfing the internet.

To have a good insurance that your asset is safe, it's better to spend more for the security of your coins than losing more than what you should have used a buy a new device for strictly for your crypto activities.

As I said before, I crossed names in a conservative manner. Here is a maximalist list.


Mind you, I might have made some mistakes. For example, maybe I should have included jeremypwr but I am not sure and I have included some that sound like casino reps but who I don't know, like 96OFFICIAL but we can get an idea.

Bitinity's signature ban has actually been a bit of shock to me. He is actually one of the users who gambles and shares his experience in those boards including promos and given the fact that he spends most of the time in those boards. Acquiring merits from there is definitely going to be so hard.

You should have crossed out campaign managers and contest organisers as well to bring out a clear picture.

---

You were one of the contest organisers some months back, no? 

I'd never heard of Freecycle either. Apparently, if your city isn't listed, you can create a group yourself to get it added. I thought I'd give it a try for my little town. But there's a catch: their website has this requirement:
My town is right on the border with Turkey, but people in the town itself don't speak Turkish. Or any of the other languages on that list, for that matter.

But if someone managed to get Sarajevo and Belgrade added, I guess the rule isn't all that strict after all. So I went ahead and submitted an application. They should review it within 7-10 days. If they approve it, I'll join TheButterZone and spread the word to my friends.

Anyway, it's a great initiative!

Topic original: [Mega resources for newbies] Check here, find most of your need, before asking.

---

---

Note

• Utilizatorii noi adresează multe întrebări repetate, iar topicul acesta se află aici, în secțiunea Beginners & Help, pentru a-i ajuta să găsească răspunsuri la întrebările cele mai frecvente, fără a le mai pune.
• Sper ca acest topic  să mai rărească aceste întrebări, său măcar să ajute cumva.
• Știu că unora dintre cei noi nu le va păsa de acest topic, dar asta este.
• Topicul este în dezvoltare, nu este complet încă.
• Este încuiat temporar, pentru a evita spam-ul.

---

Cuprins

• Topicuri referitoare la forum
• Unelte construite de comunitatea forumului
• Cărți despre Bitcoin
• Resurse pentu învățat
• Portofele
• Unelte pentru scripturi Bitcoin, depanare, note explicative
• ETF-uri spot bitcoin
• Probleme de securitate
• Jocuri de noroc
• Sevicii & locuri de muncă

Topicuri referitoare la forum


Unelte construite de comunitatea forumului



Campanii de semnături & avatar conduse de comunitate


Cărți despre Bitcoin
* Link-urile de descărcare pentru unele cărți sunt luate de pe [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Link-urile pot fi inaccesibile oricând, depind de Maus0728.

Resurse pentu învățat


Portofele

---

---

Traducere realizată la inițiativa:

When I crossed out the names at a glance, I knew someone would object. Ok that name crossed out was wrong. How about we focus on the point I was trying to make? You can’t just take the merits distributed in that section and claim that if someone earns a quarter of the average merit, it means they aren’t contributing, because many of them are awarded to casino representatives or people linked to them.

I wouldn't be very surprised if secure element on other hardware wallet also could extract it's private/sensitive data, either due to vulnerability or intentional choice. But IMO the Ledger case is especially bad, because it's intentional choice with paid subscription and they used to have great reputation among enthusiast. I still remember people used to recommend either Ledger or Trezor many years ago.

This has been the case for a long while now actually where Stake is in a completely different league when compared to the rest with Roobet next and the rest following though I have no clue why so many people in this forum overfocus on deposit volumes.

More important metrics in comparison are annual revenues, net profits etc which provide an accurate estimate of a site's health and I believe Stake is still numero uno when comparing via those metrics too.

The crossed out part I took as a personal insult  The majority of my merits have been earned from my posts and threads as a regular forum member, not as a casino representative. Pedro is belittling my contributions, tsk...

We’ve told you before, that doesn’t mean anything; the people who earn the most points on those forums are usually casino representatives.


I have crossed out names from that list on the safe side, as I could also have crossed out campaign managers and accounts which, although not directly linked to casinos, belong to members who are connected in some way through organising promotions or events with them. Take all those off the list and you’ll see that he doesn’t come off half as badly. 

Also, informative?

This is how informative real discussions are on another forum:

That's a huge, Huge, HUGE difference though.

Ledger gave hackers an API to extract keys from Ledger devices over the internet. It's built into every Ledger device. And I can't help assuming the trackers in Ledger's awful companion app will eventually be used by hackers to find Ledger users (Ledger Wallet, formerly known as Ledger Live).

I think that whole scheme is a time bomb waiting to go off. And when it does, we'll never know. It'll be just like what happened to ColdCard users: Hackers will spend a long time gathering as many seed phrases from Ledger wallets as they can before they empty them en masse. Hackers could already be gathering Ledger seed phrases as we speak.

That being said... I definitely agree that any hardware wallet can be susceptible to hacks. This is one of the reasons I stopped using hardware wallets that save the seed (or the wallet) on the device. I switched to airgapped & stateless self custody instead: SeedSigner/ShieldSigner, Krux, Kern.

Airgapped: Can't be reached over the internet.
Stateless: The seed can't be extracted from the device (because nothing is saved on the device).

And with ShieldSigner, Krux and Kern, you can encrypt the SeedQR, which means even if somebody finds it, all they found is a QR code that scans as empty (because it's encrypted).

If you expand it to 1 year, he is the 13th most active poster on the Gambling board but 54th in merits earned on that board. To me that suggests his posts (in general) aren't particularly informative or interesting to most readers.


Because this account is particularly lacking in certain areas. They use the same words to describe the same or similar concepts, repeatedly -- for years now, living almost entirely in threads where not many people appear to be reading much of anything.

Nobody should be "free to spam." If you'd like, PM me some examples of accounts you think are clearly spammers that haven't been sigbanned yet.


Here's a list of the top 60 merit earners on the Gambling board over the last 365 days so people can evaluate the data themselves:

1 - JackpotterCasino: 195 merits
2 - Zwei: 136 merits
3 - Rainbet: 134 merits
4 - sportsbet.io: 124 merits
5 - notblox1: 105 merits
6 - SirJohnVonSlotty: 93 merits
7 - buwaytress: 91 merits
8 - memehunter: 81 merits
9 - goodpunt: 78 merits
10 - Mahdirakib: 75 merits
11 - Pmalek: 72 merits
12 - SamReomo: 66 merits
13 - Harkorede: 63 merits
14 - @Whale: 59 merits
15 - Betpanda: 54 merits
16 - TheOriginals: 54 merits
17 - jeremypwr: 54 merits
18 - BetFury.io: 53 merits
19 - Betwrong: 53 merits
20 - Bitz_Casino: 51 merits
21 - SpongeS: 50 merits
22 - panjul07: 50 merits
23 - AB de Royse777: 49 merits
24 - bitmover: 48 merits
25 - Spinly: 45 merits
26 - yahoo62278: 45 merits
27 - 1win.global: 42 merits
28 - BABY SHOES: 42 merits
29 - AHOYBRAUSE: 37 merits
30 - slaman29: 37 merits
31 - Haunebu: 35 merits
32 - dewez: 34 merits
33 - salad daging: 34 merits
34 - 2UP.io: 32 merits
35 - hosemary: 31 merits
36 - EOSBet: 30 merits
37 - victorhing: 30 merits
38 - Bspin_io: 29 merits
39 - EarnOnVictor: 28 merits
40 - Monarch-: 28 merits
41 - iv4n: 28 merits
42 - xLays: 28 merits
43 - efialtis: 26 merits
44 - leea-1334: 26 merits
45 - Allstars.io Team: 25 merits
46 - Free Market Capitalist: 25 merits
47 - Little Mouse: 25 merits
48 - Slissy: 25 merits
49 - julerz12: 25 merits
50 - rohang: 25 merits
51 - LFC_Bitcoin: 24 merits
52 - famososMuertos: 24 merits
53 - 96OFFICIAL: 23 merits
54 - Bitinity: 23 merits
55 - Upgrade00: 23 merits
56 - duelbits: 23 merits
57 - Potato Chips: 22 merits
58 - xandry: 22 merits
59 - Pseudo-Random: 21 merits
60 - Trofo: 21 merits

The last spot goes to you!

That’s exactly the kind of thing we want these tests to show.

We already record the actual time it takes for a withdrawal to reach the wallet rather than relying on the casino calling it “instant”. I agree that if a withdrawal still needs manual approval and takes 10–15 minutes, it makes sense to distinguish that from a genuinely near-instant withdrawal.

We haven’t specifically tracked 0-confirmation Bitcoin deposits as a separate test point yet, but that’s a good one to add to the testing process.

As for EarnBet, we haven’t tested it yet, but we can definitely add it to the shortlist for future real-money tests.



Good point about bankroll size.

We already show the deposit and withdrawal amounts in the tests, but adding the total amount wagered would give much more context. A casino may behave differently with a small account compared with someone depositing, wagering and withdrawing significantly larger amounts.

Doing several deposit and withdrawal cycles would also be useful, especially for seeing whether KYC appears later, withdrawals start taking longer, or anything else changes after more activity.

We probably won’t be able to do this for every casino straight away, but follow-up tests on selected brands and different bankroll sizes are definitely something we want to explore.



I agree that multiple tests over time and with different amounts would give a much stronger picture than a single test.

For now, each test represents one particular player journey, so the sample size is obviously limited. As we build more tests, we also want to revisit some casinos rather than treating one result as final.

On BC.Game vs Stake, KYC was only one of the categories that contributed to the test score, so the difference wasn’t based on KYC alone. But I agree that the current scoring doesn’t make the reasons behind the difference clear enough.

That’s something we need to improve by showing the score for each category more clearly and explaining how the final test score is calculated.



You’re right to question this, and I think there are two different ratings being mixed together here.

The 9.5 shown for BC.Game is the overall casino review rating. It isn’t calculated as an average of the real-money tests. The 8/10 is the score from that particular hands-on test, while the main casino rating is based on the broader review and other criteria.

The $5 no-deposit bonus article was also a different type of test. It wasn’t created for scoring the casino. We wanted to check the full process of actually claiming the bonus and show players the steps involved.

A lot of affiliate/review sites, including us in the past, publish information about no-deposit bonuses based on the casino’s terms without actually checking whether the offer can still be claimed. That can lead to negative feedback from players when the bonus turns out to be unavailable or works differently in practice.

So that article was partly a test for us as well: we wanted to see whether a step-by-step real-money check of a no-deposit bonus would actually be useful for players interested in that offer.

We also plan to run several more BC.Game tests covering different situations and deposit amounts. That should give us more data and allow us to reassess the test score more fairly instead of relying too much on one particular session.

That said, the fact that the 9.5 review rating and the 8/10 test score can be confused so easily shows that we need to separate and label them much more clearly.

And you’re also right about the withdrawal point. If the test didn’t reach a completed withdrawal, it shouldn’t look as if we actually tested and scored the withdrawal experience. That part needs to be reviewed and presented as not tested rather than as a completed withdrawal result.



That’s a good point, especially about how “No KYC” is presented.

We want to look more closely at exactly when verification appears during the player journey. If a casino markets itself as No KYC but can still request full verification later, especially at withdrawal, that should be explained very clearly rather than being hidden somewhere in the terms.

At the same time, some casinos use risk-based verification, so KYC may not happen to every player at the same stage. That’s one of the reasons why we think it’s useful to document exactly what happened during each test rather than simply label a casino as KYC or No KYC.

And I agree with your second point as well. A real-money test should show what happened in that particular case, while the broader casino assessment should also take into account documented player feedback, reputation and unresolved issues from other sources.

This is one of the things we want to improve: keeping the hands-on test score clearly separate from the overall casino rating, so one or two successful tests don’t automatically outweigh the wider picture.

Also don't forget that Ledger used to make fake/false claim private key can't leave or extracted from their device.


In case those link become invalid or changed, check https://web.archive.org/web/20260910154931/ledger.com/academy/basic-basics/ledgers-bit-of-it/ledger-nano-security-made-easy and https://archive.ph/CZhFl.

---

And that's what EU currently try to do with EU Kids Act, using "kids safety" as scapegoat.

At a moment like that, find yourself wondering: what could possibly go wrong? ... Everything!

All the regulator needs to do is mandate via yet another "wonderful" bill passed "for the greater good, against everything bad, and for the well-being of citizens" - that HW manufacturer collect, store, and transmit seed-phrases, much like the requirements for KYCs and personal data collection (data that routinely gets leaked or stolen). Sound absurd? In reality, bills just as idiotic as that actually get passed.

Well, smokers also pay for the thing that's "killing" them. So, it's all good.

To get clients to agree to this, the key is to present it in an appealing way.

I imagine that’s precisely the "effect" ledger was counting on. In reality, in this case, ledger ought to be paying the users. Ledger owners would actually be better off staking their crypto-assets; you lose control over the assets there too, but at least you get paid some small amount of interest.

Either you pay or you get paid, but the outcome is the same: you lose control.


And yet, someone is using Ledger Recovery (on a paid basis), right? It would be interesting to know the number of users in order to gauge the scale (of the potential threat).

Which hackers and malicious actors will inevitably study - using AI. They will find a vulnerability, and the Coldcard saga will repeat itself.

As long as it makes them money, it isn't a mistake. Besides, why should we care about other's mistakes? At least, not as long as it doesn't affect us.

Every one of their customers makes a mistake by blindly trusting the Ledger Recovery feature.

Therefore, the solution is this: don't use Ledger Recovery, don't own a ledger's hardware wallets, and stay away from that company.

That's was very sharp on your side to notice that quickly before depositing your funds.
Then again you're  right on the fact that players needs to be very careful and vigilant when depositing money so as not to deposit money to the wrong address.
It's good when there is an upgrade but then it slows down cause players have to understand how the upgraded system works.

Ledger Recover is seen as a ticking time bomb... Even though it's only activated with the user's conscious consent, who guarantees they aren't sending encrypted keys on the servers? We know the code is closed source, so neither the company can guarantee anything beyond words and marketing arguments, nor do the users themselves have any assurance that the firmware actually behaves as stated...

If Ledger truly wants to gain credibility from Bitcoiners OG users, they should make the firmware open source.

It seems they like to follow the motto: make mistakes, keep making mistakes, and they can't see an opportunity to make a mistake without diving headfirst into it............

bitz.io username: kukuku
Slot number: 33

---

USERNAME	SLOT	RANK	REG DATE	POST
......................................	......	....................	................................	.........
Smartprofit	01	Legendary	August 21, 2017	check
xandry	02	Legendary	September 29, 2014	check
mv1986	03	Legendary	February 09, 2014	check
knuckey	04	Sr. Member	June 16, 2015	check
DabsPoorVersion	05	Sr. Member	April 01, 2017	check
hopenotlate	07	Legendary	December 03, 2013	check
Itz-prisigold	08	Sr. Member	October 02, 2025	check
inearth	10	Member	October 02, 2024	check
jcojci	11	Full Member	August 23, 2016	check
UserU	12	Hero Member	December 17, 2017	check
lodocus	17	Sr. Member	April 16, 2025	check
Lucano	18	Hero Member	April 16, 2013	check
Barcode_	19	Hero Member	February 21, 2016	check
tiCeR	20	Legendary	July 10, 2011	check
Pandorak	21	Hero Member	January 24, 2023	check
demonica	22	Full Member	February 27, 2020	check
Debbiecrypto	23	Member	February 06, 2024	check
Road21Bitcoin	24	Copper Member	December 30, 2019	check
Woodie	25	Hero Member	October 18, 2016	check
Improved	26	Member	March 06, 2015	check
Pmalek	27	Legendary	May 05, 2013	check
m2017	29	Legendary	November 09, 2017	check
examplens	31	Legendary	April 13, 2014	check
VashaUdacha777	32	Full Member	May 17, 2018	check
rbynxx	34	Hero Member	October 27, 2017	check
Dip69	35	Member	September 10, 2024	check
RTX-G53	37	Member	November 23, 2023	check
Leahized	38	Sr. Member	September 20, 2023	check
Unknown Op	39	Hero Member	November 01, 2022	check

Available Slots (11): 06, 09, 13, 14, 15, 16, 28, 30, 33, 36, 40

---

Just a reminder: this is just scraped data, not a final decision. The manager can still move or reassign the slots based on their rules. This is just for reference. Also, since it's an automated scrape, sometimes error or bug can happen, just double check it. scrapped using @btalkgamesbot

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

It should be kept separately from your devices used for daily things and interact with online things as well as other devices like USB sticks for example. If it's not your own device, but devices of family members, friends, or computers at public places, it's more risky and practice must be more careful.

If I have my own devices, laptop, desktop, phones, I will never log in my account on devices of other people or free at public places.

I understand that some people don't have personal device, so they have to share devices with other people but let's use Hardware wallets and Tail OS for security protection.

How to Install Tails OS on USB flash drive for Wallet Purpose.

All I want to know is whether they believe in that, or they just want to be controversial for the clicks 


Let's hope so because it's becoming very annoying, and it's not just the ability to send or seeing the balances, even the prices like I have mentioned on a previous post doesn't seem to be functioning properly.

---

Regarding the Robbery protection/duress mode, has anyone tried using it since they made it available for free on the app store? I'm not sure if I'm missing something but it does not seem to work? I did setup the new PIN, but both the robbery protection as well as the original PIN seem to be opening and showing the same thing?

da es von Lafu leider für die monate juli, august und september keine updates gab, aber dieses thema doch aktuell bleiben sollte, möchte ich ihn etwas unter die arme greifen und euch wenigstens das update für den monat oktober veröffentlichen
im oktober waren 116 user berechtigt in die dt-liste mit aufgenommen zu werden:

alte dt1-liste:

neue dt1-liste:

aus unserem deutschsprachigen bereich sind insgesamt 10 leute vertreten: Buchi-88, willi9974, o_solo_miner, Real-Duke, Lafu, mole0815, Lakai01, efialtis, bullrun2024bro und AHOYBRAUSE
hier ist nochmal der original beitrag von theymos: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg67198109#msg67198109

wer genau rausgeflogen ist und wer dafür neu aufgenommen wurde, dies könnt ihr aus dieser liste entnehmen - hier hat es leider qwk und d5000 getroffen:

These are not paid reviews.

There is a method for determining the moment of execution of the transaction, which is sufficient for determining the exact price at a certain moment. Thanks to blockchain technology for that.
Also, a good observation about the source used in the methodology for calculating the actual real price. CoinGecko and CMC have somehow taken the lead in this and most tools rely on their API.

It was younger brother's phone I tried using to access my exchange account in order to send funds to someone because my phone got bad at that moment. I don't even know how come his phone got infected with clipboard malware. One thing I know is that, he loves watching movies online from random sites. That's what he uses his phone mostly for.

Ever since then, I don't use anyone phone for anything crypto related because I feel it might not be safe for me. Imagine, that I had no idea of clipboard malware or I was in a rush and didn't recheck the address, I would have lost my funds and learn in a hard way.

Most people in third countries could get clipboard malware by doing several activities:

• Watching movies from a pirated site
• Pop-up ads is also related to a pirated site move cause mostly they using pops up ads running.
• Downloading cracked games
• Downloading applications from non-official resources like (Playstore, Microsoft or other)

The first three are usually the reasons why someone gets malware, especially in third countries. As you know, even 5-10$ already consider bigs for them and they don't want to spend more than 5-10$ to buy a Netflix or official games from Stream.

They taken option for download or watching from non-official resource.

This is definitely huge, one best winning moment experienced by their player. Turning such small bets to massive amount make that game looks so appealing to play.

The reply or that win we have saw, indicates that one spin could change the situation of the players and this definitely a jaw dropping moment for him.

Got amaze seeing this big win and for sure many gamblers see this feel the same way to.

I think 30 days is going to work fine for me, but more months would be better.

This is one thing I would like to see improved in Jackpotter, but I don't think they are process withdrawals in the same speed for all customers.
I think I talked with one member with account in Jackpotter and he told me withdrawals are always very fast for him.
Being patient is always good, and talking with support can sometimes speed things up.

Tagirani smo, pa smo ispratili Bar ja.

Ovo će mi biti zadnji post na temu. Moj bulshit radar ovdje radi na veliko i jednostavno mi nešto ne sjeda u cijeloj toj priči. Možda je samo corporate mazanje očiju. Namjerno ne odgovaram u threadu jer mi se ne da uvući u nikakvu raspravu a u konačnici dok se učesnici kampanje ne bune, šta se ja imam buniti. Ali tagnem ih ja ovdje pa barem vide kada su već prevodili i moje postove.

---

Poluistina u najboljem slučaju. Znam barem neke ljude koji su se prijavili na kampanju i defenitvno su bolji posteri od onih koji su prihvaćeni. Plus utjecajniji plus poznatiji po bpipu.... Uglavnom cijena je sigurno bila dio paketa. Kako i treba biti. Zašto napisati da nije? Meni se čini da me neko smatra budalom kada to kaže. Cijena mora biti dio paketa u sig kampanji i reći da nije mi je neozbiljno.

[quotPricee author=antiswap link=topic=5594915.msg67210646#msg67210646 date=1791217471]
In total, all our payments to all members add up to $690 so far, and every active member is already paid in advance. That total will grow every week. Individual rates stay between us and each member.
[/quote]
Brojka isplaćene love bez popratne transakcije i individual rates ne znače ništa. Može biti frizirana na više da ispadne da troše više ili na manje da se ljudi u kampanji osjećaju bolje i važnije. Znam da nekima u našoj Sportsbet kampani ne pada dobro što nisu dobili najviši rang. Ovako to elegantno izbjegneš. Opet, nigdje ne piše da to treba biti javno, ali ovako napisana brojka meni je samo marketiški trik bez ikakavog pokrića.

---

Sve te popratne stvari za jednu kampanju, te telegram bot, te dodatna stranica.... Zašto? Možda sam samo prestar i vidio previše gluposti pa pušem na hladno i kad ne treba. Ali na internetu a pogotovu u kriptu, bolje biti preoprezan kod bilo čega. I još jednom ponavljam, nemam apsolutno nikakve dokaze ili razloge da mislim da antiswap kampanja nije legit i točno ono što tvrde. Samo ono "rubs me the wrong way" feeling po nekoliko točaka

No da ne pljujem samo, volim vidjeti inovacije i ovdje ih sigurno ima. Sa gledišta antiswapa stvarno super odrađen posao. Sretno bilo i njima i svim učesnicima.

Hey! the Goated loans are only given out to players who are sapphire and above, we don't give out loans more than what they are eligible, its mainly against they are pending reward.

https://www.goated.com/help/article/10714136-goated-loans

Evo koliko sam video u thread-u su vam odgovorili na diskusiju koju ste imali ovde. Meni licno sve ovo deluje legit i jedna jako profesionalna kampanja. Zanimljiv koncept,a opet jednostavan,takodje kazu da cena nikad nije bila krierijum.
@Pmalek @Trofo tag ako niste ispratili

I don't ignore such things when it comes to deposit money into a platform. I make sure that I always recopy the deposit address from the platform to avoid change in address and my deposit goes to the wrong address. I have almost deposited funds to a scammer address due to clipboard malware.

It's good that casino always make an upgrade in their system from time to time for players to have a better gambling experience than the previous. However, it's not all upgrade that is in the favour of the gamblers. Security reasons can also be the cause.

Our campaign has been discussed in a few other threads, so here are our answers in one place.

Translation from Croatian: "They were surely looking for the people who asked the least while still meeting some minimum requirements they set. So you'd expect them to rather work with someone asking $70 a week than with those who want $100, $150 or $200, if they think the first one is a 'good enough' poster. So far the campaign has no table of accepted members, and I don't think it will have one."

We did not pick whoever asked the least. Price was never the filter.

And there is a table now. Our campaign page lists every member wearing the AntiSwap signature, the date their contract runs to, and the total we have paid out so far:
https://signature.antiswap.info/

You can see for yourself who works with us. We pay each period at its start, not after it. In total, all our payments to all members add up to $690 so far, and every active member is already paid in advance. That total will grow every week. Individual rates stay between us and each member.

Translation from Croatian: "In my opinion it was a social experiment to see how low the best profiles are willing to go on pay."

No, it is not an experiment. I simply want to find people I find interesting and comfortable to work with. I also don't want this forum to turn into a bot party where AI writes posts for people, and I don't want to contribute to that through my campaign. That is why our selection is strict and thorough.

Translation from Croatian: "Yes, I applied, and apart from the $5 they gave to everyone who applied, I got no reply. As far as I can see, the campaign is still open."

Right, the campaign is not over. We are still waiting for replies from some applicants, and good new applications come in every day.

Let's be honest: the average manager's goal is to spend the budget quickly and get their cut. That's understandable. The company that hired them doesn't want to wait either, people want to see things moving. But that rush gives a quality we would not accept, so we decided to run our campaign ourselves instead of hiring a manager.

We are collecting at a pace that is comfortable for us. If we haven't answered you, feel completely free to take another signature. No problem at all.


We see that too, and we act on it. Posts made just to pass our checks get reported:



Some of those accounts now have this on their profile:



Banned from displaying signatures until September 2027, so they won't be wearing ours or anyone else's any time soon. We keep an eye on this so that our campaign does not harm the forum.

I haven't watched the video yet, but I've been using the card practically since I read this topic and I can say that it's perhaps the best virtual card that currently exists. People are always skeptical because the card has a subscription fee that is paid in advance, but good things come at a price, even though we're not talking about a large amount.

Of course, a note for anyone considering any NO-KYC card - there is always a risk that the card will stop working for various reasons. The person behind this is honest in my opinion and they put a lot of effort into this, but they can't influence other things. The good thing is that the card supports LN top ups, so you can have your funds instantly in your account when you need them.

Yeah, I just saw their post on X (Twitter), too. WTF! NoLimit's slots are really pretty crazy when it comes to their volatility and big payouts. That $18 booster really paid off for that player.
Imagine winning that amount; what would you do? Continue your winning streak? Or immediately cash out and call it a day.

---

BTW, EarnBet is also doing a small giveaway for that crazy hit, too. Mechanics are pretty simple: just drop your EarnBet username in the comments. Join here: https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2107053444158943672

Thanks for pinning this down - that explains problem.

Tor Browser's Safest security level disables JavaScript on all sites (and Safer often does the same on onion, because the service is http://, not https://). AntiSwap currently expects JavaScript: the language switcher and the currency list on the left are rendered that way, so they will not work with JS turned off. That is expected at the moment, not a Tor outage.

A proper no-JS version is not planned as a current task, but we may add one later so Safest users can switch language and browse directions without scripts.

Thank you! That's exactly what I was looking for. @Pmalek was right saying that he's sure the casino has some sort of betting history section. Thank you, @SilverCryptoBullet for the confirmation. I would make this "Continue Playing" thing more noticeable than it is now here:



But, anyways, it serves its purpose as it is. I clicked on Minted Mike by Hacksaw, the game I played last time I visited Degen, and got some great vibes from playing it.




It didn’t take long before I won with a pretty nice multiplier — 277x:



It’s nice weather outside. I think I’m going to celebrate the win right now.

Yes, it allows you to make sub 1 sat/vbytes transactions since the version 4.7.0, and like the desktop version, all you need for making such transactions is to be connected to a server that accepts them.

From Electrum's Release notes:

Previous participants get their bibs in except if they no longer want to join the campaign while there are new participants accepted according to an announcement post of Little Mouse in that campaign hours ago.

From the campaign spreadsheet, the list of accepted participants this time has 18 forum members, and it's a same figure of previous weeks. I don't compare their username so not sure there are any previous participants did not join this time or there are some new members this time.

Ti bi se na lakši način htio riješiti problema, ne ide to tako 
Moraš šutiti i trpiti, te financijski servisirati sve što ti žena traži ako želiš mir u kući.
Srećom pa imaš crypto i osnovu za to, što bi tek bilo da si uložio u neke propale dionice? 
Lijepo rasporedi sav crypto na više walleta, jedan neka bude za slučaj prepada u kući, drugi za ženu a treći tajni, tebi za crne dane, nikad se ne zna.
Pretpostavljam da predbračni ugovor niste potpisali? 

It is because you are using desktop Electrum for transactions will be the reason you did not know early. It was also not possible on mobile Electrum before, but version 4.7.0 supported it, the time it also supported fee customization. So far you connected to the node that is supporting it, the transaction will be sent.

That's great, if only the newer versions of Electrum didn't have minimum system requirements above what we actually have.

Pmalek, since version 4.6.2 of Electrum, you no longer need to use the wallet.relayfee=(lambda: 0) command, and all you need is to be connected to a server that accepts transactions with a fee rate of less than 1 sat/vbyte.
I noticed this after SeriouslyGiveaway shared a link to your topic in another thread thinking that it's difficult to make such transactions using Electrum.

I made this post, because you may want to consider editing the topic, so that it reflects the changes that have made it easier to make sub 1 sat/vbyte transactions in more recent versions of Electrum.


LoyceV
I mentiond your name here, as I didn't want to repeat the same thing in your thread.

Hey guys, I just noticed there are two different signature designs for Earnbet. One at OP, and another at page 18. So, I asked LM about it, and he told me to use the ones from page no 18 (sportsbet), and also suggested I let you all know.

So here, I'm letting you all know.

---

These are the codes...

New accepted users


If someone isn't included in the list (past participants), please let me know in DM.

Week day has changed to Tuesday to Monday.

Po meni je to bio social experiment da se vidi koliko nisko su spremni ići najbolji profili s isplatama. Nadam se da nas nisu unazadili previše sa danom statistikom. Ovo je bila perfektna prilika za "rising tides lifts all ships", da nitko od top profila nije ponudio ispod recimo 200$ bilo bi to neko novo vrijeme kampanja.

Ono šta ja očekujem da se dogodilo je da je par dobrih profila dalo relativno male zahtjeve i odmah dobilo mjesto. Totalno nagađanje s moje strane, nisam uopće gledao ko je primljen niti ako ima kakav tx id iz kojeg se vidi plaćanje. Tu sam ih svrstao od početka i kada su me kontaktirali na PM, napisao sam im da mi ne pada na pamet licitirati sa svojom cijenom niti korisiti nekakav neprovjerani bot za prijavu. Znaju di sam pa ako sam im stvarno interesantan nek se jave sa konkretnom ponudom.

Well, your guess is as good as mine, but an update wouldn't have hurt in the least bit. Am hoping most of the old members for their campaign get called back and that the performance of the platform get improved after this maintenance both as regards on time support response to customers alike.

No, there is no problem with RFC 6979. It does not "misfire", I believe what ABCbits meant is that there's possibility someone has a flawed implementation, which is true in everything.

Zar se ti nisi prijavljivao u onu Antiswap kampanju? To se nešto odužilo.
Nekako mi se ucinilo da si ti i jos par koje sam video koji su aplicirali, idealni kandidati za tu kampanju. Vidljivi svuda, redovno pisanje bez uslova kampanje... Za kampanju koja zeli sto vise automatizacije, bar je tako predstavljena, nema boljih kandidata.

Cekaj, pa ti ga sad savetujes da razmenjuje misljenja sa razbojnicima. A sta ako Trofa ovi ubede da je to laksa brza lova, pa se i on otisne u te vode  Covek je vec pod pritiskom, samo jos treba neko da mu predlaze alternativne izlaze iz situacije.

I agree that experience makes a difference, but a casino shouldn't rely on users being patient just because they have withdrawn successfully before. New players judge a platform by their first experience, and unclear withdrawal timelines can quickly damage trust. Even if every withdrawal is eventually paid, providing estimated processing times and updates when delays occur would help reduce uncertainty. Transparency is especially important in crypto gambling because users can easily compare platforms and choose one that offers a smoother withdrawal experience.

Experienced users of a casino and new users of the same casino will have very different feelings with pending withdrawals. You already had experience with JP and you can feel calm without panic if your withdrawal is pending for hours or days. It's still inconvenient but you at least are not panic.

However it is different with new users of JP, they lack of experience with JP and withdrawal processing, so they will have more reasons to feel fearful and panic that they will lose their coins and money. In general, this withdrawal procedure needs to be improved by JP for both current and new users.

That's true, there's also possibility of choosing weak K/nonce when signing TX/message as well. I only mentioned it as response of "remote theft of funds" attack angle, that probably involve other server or internet usage.

Thing is Trustpilot is actually useful to a certain extent since there are legitimate reviews mixed in with fake reviews though the fake reviews have reduced over time thanks to their team making some useful changes. I tend to rely on them a bit.

I never put all of my eggs in one basket which is why I check Trustpilot, Reddit, Google Reviews, Bitcointalk etc to make a decision regarding any sort of service. Takes more time, but worth it in my opinion.

Me neither.
I saw many times people being hired to write fake reviews on trust pilot for cheap money, so I seriously doubt all of them are real.
There are some percentage of real reviews for sure, but it is not easy to know what percentage are are and what fake reviews.
We have trustpilot crypto alternative few years ago, and they ahd topic in bitcointalk forum, but I am not sure if they are still working.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15148 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (18) 10544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2810 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3690 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7015 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +44 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2342 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +56 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2667 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 209 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 14034 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 7056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 10944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 787 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +42 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4531 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11571 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 12317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (60) 21792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3169 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +11 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 10651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1430 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 4123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +6 / =7 / -0) (DT1! (0) 841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1536 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4017 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3755 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2083 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4698 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (40) 13468 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2415 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 10225 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7777 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4349 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 21519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3256 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2621 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5868 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 5873 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +51 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (4) 3830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1753 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 8399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10341 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1659 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5396 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1305 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3663 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 3442536: AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2047 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 7322 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (8901 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

A single distinctive review can lead people to form a conclusion about service quality more effectively than ten generic ones. Average users rarely take the initiative to write even a brief, positive review unless prompted by an incentive, whereas users experiencing issues often resort to posting negative reviews simply to get a response to their complaint. lol

Kampanja koju vodi LM Earnbet je ponovo otvorena
Nedeljna isplata je u BTC-u i iznosi $60 za Sr clanove a za H/L iznosi $90
Pravila
Minimum 25 postova nedeljno je potrebno za isplatu
Maksimum se racuna 5 postova u lokalu
Minimum 5 postova u gambling sekciji je potrebno za isplatu
@Pmalek tag jer znam da si bio u toj kampanji

There's a new accusation against them on Trustpilot https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/6abf5a9e6be9092bfe350b73

Somehow they are still answering that issue, but that doesn't mean they are fine and would rather give weights on the accusation posted against them here.

With recent issues they are facing, I also think that's enough proof for people to stay away in their casino.

Problem je šta je to nešto? Nekome je 1000$ puno a nekome 1M$ malo. Ako netko misli da smo svi mi u kriptu bogataši, ne pomaže ti to.

Ja si sve nekako mislim da bi im rekao da uzmu moju ženu na mjesec, dva ako mi ne vjeruju pa probaju financirati ideje  Onda bi mi povjerovali.

Slot #: 44
BTC Address: bc1qpzwvre2ynerqxc6nk6ur8zspvdx54qrzwyy7f7

---

latest scrapped participants data and available slots

USERNAME	SLOT	RANK	REG DATE	POST
......................................	......	....................	................................	.........
Porfirii	01	Legendary	April 27, 2017	check
tiCeR	02	Legendary	July 10, 2011	check
Kelward	03	Hero Member	April 22, 2023	check
internetional	04	Legendary	October 24, 2016	check
DabsPoorVersion	05	Sr. Member	April 01, 2017	check
xandry	06	Legendary	September 29, 2014	check
Harkorede	07	Copper Member	May 27, 2018	check
mv1986	08	Legendary	February 09, 2014	check
Real-Duke	09	Legendary	December 22, 2014	check
Smartprofit	10	Legendary	August 21, 2017	check
Peanutswar	11	Legendary	February 17, 2020	check
laijsica	12	Sr. Member	February 21, 2024	check
TheButterZone	13	Legendary	June 22, 2012	check
Pmalek	15	Legendary	May 05, 2013	check
notblox1	16	Legendary	April 08, 2018	check
klarki_mobile	17	Full Member	September 06, 2025	check
zasad@	18	Legendary	July 25, 2019	check
ASloveapg	19	Full Member	February 19, 2025	check
RGBTC	20	Legendary	November 30, 2017	check
UserU	21	Hero Member	December 17, 2017	check
famososMuertos	22	Legendary	January 05, 2018	check
GazetaBitcoin	23	Legendary	November 06, 2017	check
FinneysTrueVision	25	Legendary	October 13, 2018	check
Rikafip	26	Legendary	August 03, 2019	check
Soonandwaite	27	Legendary	January 16, 2019	check
angrybirdy	29	Sr. Member	November 29, 2016	check
Barcode_	30	Hero Member	February 21, 2016	check
Debbiecrypto	31	Member	February 06, 2024	check
Bigjoe33	32	Sr. Member	August 10, 2024	check
LogitechMouse	33	Legendary	September 07, 2017	check
examplens	34	Legendary	April 13, 2014	check
bitmover	35	Legendary	December 31, 2017	check
ovcijisir	37	Legendary	October 30, 2017	check
Etiquette.exe	38	Full Member	April 23, 2025	check
inspace	39	Legendary	November 19, 2018	check
cocadalcan	42	Full Member	February 19, 2024	check
Tmoonz	43	Hero Member	December 20, 2023	check
Hypnotizer	46	Sr. Member	September 01, 2025	check
Pandorak	48	Hero Member	January 24, 2023	check
jahead	49	Sr. Member	August 03, 2017	check
Alvin_talk	50	Full Member	August 09, 2025	check

Available Slots (9): 14, 24, 28, 36, 40, 41, 44, 45, 47

---

Just a reminder: this is just scraped data, not a final decision. The manager can still move or reassign the slots based on their rules. This is just for reference. Also, since it's an automated scrape, sometimes error or bug can happen, just double check it. scrapped using telegram bot: @btalkgamesbot