Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

@Slackovic i @Pmalek dosta ste toga lijepo objasnili, dosta mi se rizicno cini, zato i nisam nikad eksperimentirao sa time a jos kad vidim kako izgleda menu na mjenjacnicama za leverage odmah me prode volja za takvom trgovinom.

Tko zna predvidati i raditi tehnicku analizu sigurno im je puno profitabilnije trgovati sa leverage-om ali za laika kao sto sam ja bolje je da samo hodlam, drzim se spot tradinga i nista ne diram.

Jedna stvar koja me kopka, da li posudba BTC kod leverage tradinga ima rok u kojem se mora vratiti posudena sredstva. Npr. pisudio sam 1 BTC i stavim long order, koliko smijem cekati da se taj order izvrsi? Mjesec, dva? I da li se moraju platiti kamate na posudena sredstva, sto bi po meni bilo logicno.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:42:58 AM

And you know what? People still turn up in big numbers and apply. Taking that into consideration, where do you think we will go from here? Up or down? I am sure we both know the answer to that question.

I think its the same number of people applying, its just that they have more alt accounts now than before, and more and more managers are turning a blind eye to this practice.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 03:09:45 PM

Good campaign managers should also try to remove or at least reduce number if members who write low quality content.

Yes, this is what it comes down to. But as I've often said, the bar for what passes as "not spam" is extremely low. I could spend all day reporting posts that nobody in their right mind would actually bother reading. Maybe 3/4 of them would be marked as "Good" at a maximum, but then nothing really changes as a result. Its up to the campaign managers to not actively encourage shitposts by monitoring the quality of the accounts they hire.

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 08:41:27 PM

Spammer can spam for few sats or for billion sats, so campaign payment rate doesn't really matter that much.

The problem is most campaigns don't pay very much these days because they know they can hire 3 spammers for the price of 1 decent poster.

It's interesting that publishers earn tokens using hCaptcha, but it would be great to turn this into sats.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 31, 2025, 08:07:51 AM

The damn motorcycles and traffic lights can be a thing of nightmares.

Those captchas are a nightmare for all Tor browser users, Freddy Krueger Elm Street kind Tongue

I only wish someone would create a better and more private alternative for cloudflare, that would make a much better experience using Bitcointalk forum.

Quote from: Pmalek on November 02, 2025, 09:03:02 AM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on November 02, 2025, 07:03:10 AM

I am curious why there will be withdrawal limits for monthly. I would agree to a daily limit of €5,000 if someone wins 10x his total deposit. But it's quite low as a monthly limit, especially for whale gamblers. They would make big deposits, and they might win bigger amounts as well. But if you limit the withdrawal, then it's really useless. It's not your funds, and you can't limit them in such a way; when they are losing, you don't have any terms, but there's a lot of drama when they withdraw funds.

I think they are just trying to stay liquid and prevent a situation where one or more players win massive amounts and empty most of their reserves. That would then affect the entire userbase and many more players would experience issues and delays when withdrawing because there isn't enough money in the bank. Their pockets might not be as deep as those of some more popular casino brands.

This could be a valid explanation since OP didn't reply to cryptovator comment in his last reply, but this can't be a reason that everybody can deal with, especially in a very competitive market. Why should anybody chose such a brand new casino with such limits when he can keep playing in long established platforms?

Please read

* Make sure you have checked out the Sportsbook section of your Rainbet account (click the "Sports" tab) *
** Rainbet and myself reserve the right to disqualify any prediction for any reason **
*** The declared winners are final and up to my discretion ***

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Code:

arallmuus
avp2306
B1g4udge
BABY SHOES
bangjoe
Barcode_
Betwrong
buwaytress
Charles-Tim
CLS63
cryptofrka
darbitmobilerecovery
Dr.Osh
dzonikg28
el che
entebah
Etranger
famososMuertos
goodpunt
Harkorede
holydarkness
hosemary
igebotz
ILuckyGuyI
jayce
jeremypwr
Jinetics1111
Jody.Drummer
joker404
Koal-84
KTChampions
LFC_Bitcoin
Mahdirakib
michellee
mitchr4
mole0815
Mr. Magkaisa
mv1986
notblox1
Ochan_yazo_tochant
Out of mind
ovcijisir
Pmalek
Renato297
rohang
russeras
Ryu_Ar1
slaman29
Slissy
Smartvirus
Strongkored
tiCeR
TravelMug
Trofo
un_rank
VashaUdacha777
vivekdhyani1
Woodie
xandry
xLays

Please read

* Make sure you have checked out the Sportsbook section of your account (click the "Sports" tab) *
** Rainbet and myself reserve the right to disqualify any prediction for any reason **
*** The declared winners are final and up to my discretion ***

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Code:

arallmuus
avp2306
B1g4udge
BABY SHOES
bangjoe
Barcode_
Betwrong
buwaytress
Charles-Tim
CLS63
cryptofrka
darbitmobilerecovery
Dr.Osh
dzonikg28
el che
entebah
Etranger
famososMuertos
goodpunt
Harkorede
holydarkness
hosemary
igebotz
ILuckyGuyI
jayce
jeremypwr
Jinetics1111
Jody.Drummer
joker404
Koal-84
KTChampions
LFC_Bitcoin
Mahdirakib
michellee
mitchr4
mole0815
Mr. Magkaisa
mv1986
notblox1
Ochan_yazo_tochant
Out of mind
ovcijisir
Pmalek
Renato297
rohang
russeras
Ryu_Ar1
slaman29
Slissy
Smartvirus
Strongkored
tiCeR
TravelMug
Trofo
un_rank
VashaUdacha777
vivekdhyani1
Woodie
xandry
xLays

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:42:58 AM

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:43:33 AM

Seems like most campaigns already pay pretty low compared to days past, and I do blame the spammers for that...

It's not only their fault. When quality campaigns paid $200-300, people stood in line and you would get several pages of applications. When the pay rates dropped to $150-200, people again turned up in big numbers. Then it went down to $100, and the pay rate now is, in many cases, below $100. And you know what? People still turn up in big numbers and apply. Taking that into consideration, where do you think we will go from here? Up or down? I am sure we both know the answer to that question.

People come in large numbers, but if you check their posts, you'll see a lot of similar content and many threads where the same accounts regularly post the same thing. What conclusion can we draw? Low-paying companies will also be in demand, but in a very different way. These companies have many people who know how to manage their accounts so they don't overlap with their other accounts. The result for the owner will be good in terms of revenue, but it will be bad for the forum. Where one thoughtful post could have been written, the owners of alternative accounts will write two or three, which ultimately results in a lot of spam.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:42:58 AM

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:43:33 AM

Seems like most campaigns already pay pretty low compared to days past, and I do blame the spammers for that...

It's not only their fault. When quality campaigns paid $200-300, people stood in line and you would get several pages of applications. When the pay rates dropped to $150-200, people again turned up in big numbers. Then it went down to $100, and the pay rate now is, in many cases, below $100. And you know what? People still turn up in big numbers and apply. Taking that into consideration, where do you think we will go from here? Up or down? I am sure we both know the answer to that question.

This is where we get to the point where no one complains that campaigns are paying less than before, because such people could easily be accused of being on the forum only for profit. When you look at things from that angle, it's clear why companies don't want to pay more or why managers don't demand higher pay rates.

However, we have to be honest and say that the mixers were the ones who paid the most and that online casinos are not nearly as generous as the mixers, even though we all know that they make exceptional profits.

What I also want to mention is that some campaigns also have so-called VIP slots in which the pay rates are twice as high as the public ones, but I assume that there are not too many such slots and that they are reserved for extra special members.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 09:21:42 AM

Quote from: ryzaadit on November 02, 2025, 06:20:33 PM

Online gambling stuff in America are mostly restricted they trying to bypass all the risk by claiming. It's socials game and not gambling, that's why they bypass those by creating a system like coins stuff and then a redeem system to avoid or bypass those + they're not claiming those are gambling while in reality is actually gambling cause the redeem involved money, the game is a gambling game being offer.

State of californis is actually sue "Stake" for these.

Sweepstakes aren't gambling, and I doubt a US court would classify them as such. We all know why people buy those coins in sweepstakes casinos but it doesn't matter. State laws aren't being broken.

Imagine if I am not allowed to sell you coffee in my place of business. However, if you come to my shop and buy something from me worth X or more, I can give you a voucher that you can cash in and exchange for a cup of coffee. Did I sell you coffee? No. I sold you items from my shop, but because I value you as a customer, I threw in a voucher for a cup of coffee as an extra.

That's taking advantage of a loophole. You got what you wanted, which is coffee. I provided a place where you can get coffee but without taking money for it. You bought from my shop and I gave you a coffee bonus. Maybe I will throw in a cookie if you spend more next week. Grin

Yes sweepstakes is been treated differently and US court actually does not classify this as gambling if they meet their legal criteria.

I guess this one explain about its difference https://riverslot.net/blog/sweepstakes-vs-gambling/

Stake has been sued since LA court alleged that Stake is operating a online illegal business and they use the loophole you mentioned and disguised as sweepstake casino. But let see how they can defend their casino in this challenges they face. Hopefully Metawin won't face same issues gotten by the casino mentioned.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 09:04:51 AM

Daleko od toga da je ovo tema u koju se dobro razumijem ali mogu pokušati. Kod futures trgovanja ne uplačuješ čitav iznos s kojim trguješ odmah. Kao što to radiš kad kupuješ npr. BTC na spot tržištu. Ako hoćeš da kupiš BTC za $100, deponuješ $100 i kupiš za to BTC. Više nemaš $ i imas BTC. Kod futuresa, uplačuješ samo početnu maržu (margin). Ona može biti 5%, 10%, 20%... od ukupne vrijednosti. S tom onda maržom otvaraš short ili long. Ali u pozadini izgleda kao da si uložio cijeli iznos od $100 a ne samo $5, $10, itd. Zato ako BTC poraste 10% a ti imaš 10x leverage, zaradiš 100% ako uzimaš u obzir samo onu početnu maržu koju si uplatio. Isto je i u suprotnom smjeru. Ako BTC padne za 10%, gubiš sve, odnosno 100% od one početne marže.

Edit:
vidim da je slacko komentarisao dok sam pisao post i detaljnije objasnio stvari. Nek me ispravi ako je ovo moje laičko objašnjenje pogrešno.

Da, to je uglavnom to. Samo da se razumijemo, ja sam isto tako laik što se tiče futures tradinga jer se time ne bavim nego povremeno uplatim neku sitnu lovu. Kako netko uplaćuje lovu u kladionicu, tako ja u futures trading Grin

Ima još puno stvari koje su bitne (npr. razlika između isolated i cross margin mode) ali mislim da je i ovo sasvim dovoljno da se objasni kako se s 10% rasta cijene profit može povećati 70%.

Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 06:52:29 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:26:56 PM

Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 03:47:57 PM

Low paying campaign does not encourage spam but some criteria of the signature campaign encourages spam;

Low-paying signature campaigns attract users willing to accept rates lower than they are elsewhere. A high-value member, who is also a good poster, will most probably not apply to a low-paying campaign unless he really needed to. What you are left with aren't necessarily spammers, but a group of people where there is a greater chance that some of them are spammers.

I understand you very well, but it seems you are taking it literally. It works for high paying campaigns but not always so for low paying campaign. What I mean is this; it is very obvious that high paying campaigns attracts quality posters. There's no chance for a spammer to be in the high paying campaigns. But it is not always so for low paying campaigns as you noted above. Due to scarcity of campaign, it is possible to see a quality poster applying for a low paying campaign and even beg for a full member rank. That's my point here.

In any cases, it's the campaign manager's responsibility to check and ensure that the participants are making posts properly, following the rules and maintaining optimal quality and warn those who fail to meet the standard quality or the requirements set by the CM. And as a last resort, remove them from the campaign. I'm not exactly sure how each CMs monitors this, but I'm certain all of them checks it and don't just pay participants blindly. One of the recent example can be found with yahoo62278, where he removed some users who were burst posting at Altcointalk forum!

Please read

* Make sure you have checked out the Sportsbook section of your account (click the "Sports" tab) *
** Rainbet and myself reserve the right to disqualify any prediction for any reason **
*** The declared winners are final and up to my discretion ***

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Code:

arallmuus
avp2306
B1g4udge
BABY SHOES
bangjoe
Barcode_
Betwrong
buwaytress
Charles-Tim
CLS63
cryptofrka
darbitmobilerecovery
Dr.Osh
dzonikg28
el che
entebah
Etranger
famososMuertos
goodpunt
Harkorede
holydarkness
hosemary
igebotz
ILuckyGuyI
jayce
jeremypwr
Jinetics1111
Jody.Drummer
joker404
Koal-84
KTChampions
LFC_Bitcoin
Mahdirakib
michellee
mitchr4
mole0815
Mr. Magkaisa
mv1986
notblox1
Ochan_yazo_tochant
Out of mind
ovcijisir
Pmalek
Renato297
rohang
russeras
Ryu_Ar1
slaman29
Slissy
Smartvirus
Strongkored
tiCeR
TravelMug
Trofo
un_rank
VashaUdacha777
vivekdhyani1
Woodie
xandry
xLays

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:26:56 PM

Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 03:47:57 PM

Low paying campaign does not encourage spam but some criteria of the signature campaign encourages spam;

Low-paying signature campaigns attract users willing to accept rates lower than they are elsewhere. A high-value member, who is also a good poster, will most probably not apply to a low-paying campaign unless he really needed to. What you are left with aren't necessarily spammers, but a group of people where there is a greater chance that some of them are spammers.

I understand you very well, but it seems you are taking it literally. It works for high paying campaigns but not always so for low paying campaign. What I mean is this; it is very obvious that high paying campaigns attracts quality posters. There's no chance for a spammer to be in the high paying campaigns. But it is not always so for low paying campaigns as you noted above. Due to scarcity of campaign, it is possible to see a quality poster applying for a low paying campaign and even beg for a full member rank. That's my point here.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:26:56 PM

Low-paying signature campaigns attract users willing to accept rates lower than they are elsewhere. A high-value member, who is also a good poster, will most probably not apply to a low-paying campaign unless he really needed to. What you are left with aren't necessarily spammers, but a group of people where there is a greater chance that some of them are spammers.

Yes, i can agree with you. I have witnessed members refusing to apply for newly served campaigns or campaigns in general even for one with higher pay, although some do move whenever slots are open. There are personal interest to why people don't move to campaigns with higher pay, not everything revolves around payouts, this is my own view on how representing a brand should be.

Availability of campaigns is also a concern for reputed members joining low paying campaigns, managers don't just higher participants, they select participants out of many applications based on what they accept as posting standard.

Notes
* Make sure you have opened the Sportsbook on the site (click the "Sports" tab in your Rainbet account) *
** Rainbet and myself reserve the right to disqualify any prediction for any reason **
*** The declared winners are final and up to my discretion ***

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Code:

arallmuus
avp2306
B1g4udge
BABY SHOES
bangjoe
Barcode_
Betwrong
buwaytress
Charles-Tim
CLS63
cryptofrka
darbitmobilerecovery
Dr.Osh
dzonikg28
el che
entebah
Etranger
famososMuertos
goodpunt
Harkorede
holydarkness
hosemary
igebotz
ILuckyGuyI
jayce
jeremypwr
Jinetics1111
Jody.Drummer
joker404
Koal-84
KTChampions
LFC_Bitcoin
Mahdirakib
michellee
mitchr4
mole0815
Mr. Magkaisa
mv1986
notblox1
Ochan_yazo_tochant
Out of mind
ovcijisir
Pmalek
Renato297
rohang
russeras
Ryu_Ar1
slaman29
Slissy
Smartvirus
Strongkored
tiCeR
TravelMug
Trofo
un_rank
VashaUdacha777
vivekdhyani1
Woodie
xandry
xLays

Novembre 2025

Lista New Users:

Code:

theymos (CONFIRMED)
HostFat (CONFIRMED)
gmaxwell (CONFIRMED)
OgNasty (CONFIRMED)
Vod
vapourminer (CONFIRMED)
mprep (CONFIRMED)
Foxpup (CONFIRMED)
philipma1957 (CONFIRMED)
babo (CONFIRMED)
Cyrus (CONFIRMED)
Welsh (CONFIRMED)
ibminer
d5000 (CONFIRMED)
joker_josue (CONFIRMED)
Pmalek (CONFIRMED)
Mitchell (CONFIRMED)
albon
jeremypwr (CONFIRMED)
stompix (CONFIRMED)
hilariousandco (CONFIRMED)
buckrogers (CONFIRMED)
Buchi-88
willi9974 (CONFIRMED)
JayJuanGee (CONFIRMED)
NeuroticFish (CONFIRMED)
achow101 (CONFIRMED)
DaveF
examplens (CONFIRMED)
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278 (CONFIRMED)
bitbollo (CONFIRMED)
zazarb
pooya87 (CONFIRMED)
LFC_Bitcoin
Real-Duke (CONFIRMED)
klarki (CONFIRMED)
LoyceV (CONFIRMED)
The Sceptical Chymist (CONFIRMED)
SFR10 (CONFIRMED)
TryNinja (CONFIRMED)
Jet Cash
holydarkness (CONFIRMED)
Lafu (CONFIRMED)
polymerbit
tweetious (CONFIRMED)
giammangiato (CONFIRMED)
buwaytress (CONFIRMED)
crwth (CONFIRMED)
Ale88 (CONFIRMED)
Kryptowerk (CONFIRMED)
Vispilio (CONFIRMED)
imhoneer
hosemary (CONFIRMED)
krogothmanhattan (CONFIRMED)
JollyGood (CONFIRMED)
RaltcoinsB (CONFIRMED)
igebotz
roycilik (CONFIRMED)
CryptopreneurBrainboss (CONFIRMED)
hugeblack (CONFIRMED)
El duderino_ (CONFIRMED)
KTChampions (CONFIRMED)
Trofo (CONFIRMED)
icopress (CONFIRMED)
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena (CONFIRMED)
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin (CONFIRMED)
TheBeardedBaby (CONFIRMED)
tvplus006 (CONFIRMED)
coinlocket$ (CONFIRMED)
mole0815 (CONFIRMED)
bitmover (CONFIRMED)
DdmrDdmr (CONFIRMED)
morvillz7z (CONFIRMED)
Husna QA (CONFIRMED)
fillippone (CONFIRMED)
cryptofrka
The Cryptovator (CONFIRMED)
lovesmayfamilis (CONFIRMED)
DireWolfM14 (CONFIRMED)
notblox1 (CONFIRMED)
Little Mouse
YOSHIE (CONFIRMED)
Awaklara (CONFIRMED)
efialtis (CONFIRMED)
geophphreigh
zasad@ (CONFIRMED)
Rikafip (CONFIRMED)
Etranger (CONFIRMED)
NotATether (CONFIRMED)
Stalker22 (CONFIRMED)
BlackHatCoiner
Lillominato89 (CONFIRMED)
Free Market Capitalist (CONFIRMED)
PowerGlove (CONFIRMED)
God Of Thunder (CONFIRMED)

. . . .

Lista Utenti Italiani:

USER..........	...DT...	BPIP	Ninjastic
Ale88	(DT)
arulbero
babo	(DT)
coinlocket$	(DT)
fillippone	(DT)
gbianchi
bastisisca
bitbollo	(DT)
giammangiato	(DT)
mendace
Lillominato89	(DT)

Link Utili:

Quote from: Pmalek on November 01, 2025, 04:20:58 PM

Quote from: panjul07 on November 01, 2025, 01:26:26 PM

I havent checked all the available casinos in the list as I do not have account in all of those casinos, but I checked my mintdice account and the faucet amount is now $0.01 worth of btc.
Although mintdice is not active in this forum as well as this gambling site is not that popular but I think it needs to be updated since it is listed in the table.

Perhaps it's just a difference in units between the accounts. 0.0000001 BTC is equal to $0.01 (more or less). They just display it differently than what they used to or according to the currency currently selected in your account. I no longer have access to my dummy account on MintDice. I assume they deleted it due to inactivity. I can't reset its password either. Do me a favor please if you can. Check if you get a different value if you switch your currency to BTC? Or if you are already on BTC, maybe a different faucet value?

Thanks!

I tried to claim the faucet after 24hours but there are 2 different warning when I tried to claim it.
First try was with ETH and it gave a warning that the server experienced an error/issue and I'm suggested to try it again later.
Second and third try was with BTC and BNB, both gave me a warning that I have to wait for more tome before I can claim it again.
I'm not sure how long I have to wait before I can claim another faucet, I thought it is once per 24hours but it does not work after more than 24hours.
I'll try it again after few more hours and I'll let you know the result when I claimed faucet with other currency.

Bitcoin was not built to be complicated. Of course, the technical part of it is complicated, but it was built in such a way that you don't need to know the technical part of it to understand it and use it. When something is too complicated, it becomes only for a specific people; people who are in that field, but Bitcoin is for anybody. All you need to know are the basics. How it works, why and how it was created, how it is mined, and what makes it unique. These are not things that are difficult to understand. It is only after you have understood these things, which are the basics, that you can start getting an understanding of the technical part.

Quote from: Helena Yu on Today at 09:49:23 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:32:50 AM

You don't need to know how the engine of your car works and how it accelerates when you press the gas pedal to drive a car. You also don't need to know what happens when you swipe your debit card on an electronic device to be able to pay with it. Still, both cars and payment cards have attracted hundreds of millions of people.

We can apply the same logic to Bitcoin. You will need only the basic of knowledge to be able to use it. If you are interested in more complex and technical parts of the system, and some people are, they can acquire that knowledge by studying the code and learning from technical documentation. None of that is mandatory for the average user, though, in the same way as not being able to explain the internal combustion engine can still take you from A to B.

Bitcoin is already a phenomenon, and it's not a success because tech geeks and developers find it useful. Its success lies in the fact that it provides many benefits to ordinary people with limited knowledge of its technology.

If someone have a problem over centralized exchange or wallet, then who they should seek? friends? it would breach their privacy, people are less likely to contact the customer support because they like someone in real life to fix for them.

Hence, people have to know many thing than just the basic because you can't rely on someone when you have a problem.

These things you mentioned are the basics. Wallets and exchanges are the basics of understanding Bitcoin. How do you learn about Bitcoin without knowing how wallets work and ow how exchanges work? If you have a problem and need help, that doesn't make it a technical part of bitcoin; it's just normal life. In all fields of life, people need assistance; it doesn't mean the assistance they need is a technical part of that field.

The forum was created to educate and give assistance to both the technical and non-technical aspects of Bitcoin. For example, if a person wants to import his address to a new wallet and he doesn't know how to go about it, if he asks, he will be given assistance on how to do it; that doesn't mean the problem was a technical problem. It's just a basic problem he doesn't know. The fact that we use the word "basic" doesn't mean everybody understands everything about it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:32:50 AM

You don't need to know how the engine of your car works and how it accelerates when you press the gas pedal to drive a car. You also don't need to know what happens when you swipe your debit card on an electronic device to be able to pay with it. Still, both cars and payment cards have attracted hundreds of millions of people.

We can apply the same logic to Bitcoin. You will need only the basic of knowledge to be able to use it. If you are interested in more complex and technical parts of the system, and some people are, they can acquire that knowledge by studying the code and learning from technical documentation. None of that is mandatory for the average user, though, in the same way as not being able to explain the internal combustion engine can still take you from A to B.

Bitcoin is already a phenomenon, and it's not a success because tech geeks and developers find it useful. Its success lies in the fact that it provides many benefits to ordinary people with limited knowledge of its technology.

But in Bitcoin you're supposed to do all the thing alone.

If someone don't know engine car and how to fix it, we can go to car service.
If someone have a trouble with their debit card, they can go to banks.

If someone have a problem over centralized exchange or wallet, then who they should seek? friends? it would breach their privacy, people are less likely to contact the customer support because they like someone in real life to fix for them.

Hence, people have to know many thing than just the basic because you can't rely on someone when you have a problem.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:03:37 AM

Compare a signature campaign to a sports team. If you fill your team with mediocre players, you will get bad results and underperform. If you have spammers advertising your brand, they can reach the target in terms of post count, but the quality won't be as high as if you had better posters in the campaign.

This is just the actual point sir, most people will think that it's because of the pay they are not putting in enough effort, without putting into consideration that they are only giving what they have.

So it's because that's their level, and we all know that you can only give what you have, and if an account is known as a serial spammer, that shows that, it is what he knows best to do, not that the person is purposely spamming or talking out of point, he is just giving out what he got in him.

This month 114 users were eligible.

Old:

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
EcuaMobi
buckrogers
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
examplens
minerjones
yahoo62278
bitbollo
pooya87
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
condoras
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
sheenshane
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
TheBeardedBaby
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
abhiseshakana
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
efialtis
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
apogio

New:

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
jeremypwr
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
Jet Cash
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
imhoneer
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
TheBeardedBaby
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
morvillz7z
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
BlackHatCoiner
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:31:19 PM

It makes sense that you occasionally visit the ANN threads of the casinos you promote in your signature and take a look at what's going on. As is stated in the rules, it's not a must, and campaign managers don't force their participants to be active in announcement threads. At least not publicly.

It's genuinely and naturally support from participants from a campaign and if they are experienced, they do it naturally without any request from the campaign manager. They know that if their posts which are paid, can be helpful for advertisement of a company, it will help them contributing more for that campaign success so that thei job will be prolonged.

Some campaign managers sometimes make posts like "we appreciate your time to check out the site, and share your thinking about it". It's kind of an indirect command for contributions in the announcement thread, and this indirect way does not break forum rule.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:12:11 AM

According to ninjastic.space, there is no coin address associated with the account OP is trying to recover. Seems like they never staked one or posted one in a comment on the forum. It complicates things a bit because there is no public address posted on the forum prior to the hack from which he could sign a message. But it's a plus that he still controls the original email used when the Bitcointalk account was created.

If he still has access to his email, he can find past emails from Bitcoin forum like a welcome email when an account was registered, or some post deletion notifications from the forum, and surely PMs from the forum about account password changes and email change.

I have doubt that by missing many years to bring the account hack issue to the forum, his access to that email was lost too. Or the email was even disabled by the email provider. Since the policy change of Elon Musk on X, many big corporations like Google with gmail followed that policy and disable inactive gmail accounts. Other email providers can have same policy changes recent months.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (60) 13694 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 299 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 8982 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4208 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2658 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 9653 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4361 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2394 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8675 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5847 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1603 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5899 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2243 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1834 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (9) 6304 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 169515: EcuaMobi (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2557 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12237 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5922 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6482 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +130 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3088 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3431 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 11000 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2282 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4060 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (56) 19241 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 6169 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 8394 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (3) 675 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 440 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1452 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3534 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1085 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3222 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +97 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3986 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1759 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (3) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 5095 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4220 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 14749 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2097 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3058 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +75 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (30) 11015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1164 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1945 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 8931 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2377 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3045 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 7013 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 11203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 3168 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3599 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 19241 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2352 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2387 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4991 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5118 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1829 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 979 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3782 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5258 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 7377 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1674 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9063 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1492 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5976 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1121 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2852 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6583 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2172 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (8032 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (824 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:48:35 AM

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 12:55:15 AM

I think 1 day missed will reset your claim to day one again. It's about Streak if I am not wrong. You must maintain the streak, and your rewards will be increased for the next seven days. I never managed to improve my streak because I forgot to come back the next day and claim it. But if you are a regular gambler and do not want to miss the bonuses, you can surely try Bitz faucet. I like it because of the no-wagering requirement.

Yes, the whole idea is to visit the faucet section every day and claim your rewards. On the first day you get 50 sats, on the second you get 60, on the third you get 70, and the maximum is 150 sats for the last claim of the week. The rewards increase every day on condition that you don't forget and don't break your streak. If you do, you go back down to 50 sats for the first claim and you have to work yourself up again.

I used to actively collect satoshi few years back but now I don't think I would be spending my time on them. But for the new ones who are very new to crypto or who don't have any other means to collect bitcoin, faucets are the easiest and free way to accumulate satoshis.

And to all those who are accumulating satoshi through faucets, I would suggest them not to sell them and keep them for at least 10 years and see if they make some reasonable good money through this collection.

Weekly update (2025-10-24_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1761271640 2 2235093.msg65952907 1166480 3628466
1761271628 2 2235093.msg65958705 1166480 1687287
1761271588 4 2235093.msg65953405 1166480 1048869
1761270782 2 5489893.msg65958980 1166480 1416877
1761268936 1 5376945.msg65957852 252510 978337
1761268752 1 5376945.msg65957777 252510 658163
1761268127 1 5376945.msg65953244 252510 822995
1761267494 1 5376945.msg65953179 252510 3549064
1761267420 1 5376945.msg65953089 252510 3661617
1761267273 1 5376945.msg65952821 252510 3620542
1761265947 1 5560925.msg65870110 2003859 355846
1761264022 1 178336.msg65958291 140584 64507
1761263992 1 178336.msg65958203 140584 169384
1761263955 1 178336.msg65929807 140584 3646263
1761263938 1 5562765.msg65937441 140584 3646263
1761263526 1 5560573.msg65956290 407174 3499955
1761263513 1 5484350.msg65959017 140584 3521023
1761263407 3 5491208.msg65957795 407174 2654005
1761263126 1 5484350.msg65957339 252510 3532960
1761262989 1 582736.msg7579128 33156 164822
1761262979 1 495948.msg5461811 33156 52098
1761262919 1 582736.msg6386906 33156 16116
1761262828 1 5523596.msg65953757 1247226 137185
1761262725 1 5484350.msg65956825 252510 3500874
1761262230 1 5224503.msg65958779 2003859 137185
1761261833 1 5563003.msg65947809 140584 3517887
1761261656 1 5516151.msg65959038 140584 3646263
1761260877 1 5563141.msg65956937 1269497 176777
1761260202 1 5479271.msg65959742 137185 302041
1761259948 1 5479271.msg65957782 302041 137185
1761258851 4 5546441.msg65472776 982288 1024933
1761258688 1 5539943.msg65953671 33156 3542282
1761258656 1 5539943.msg65956237 33156 11425
1761258472 1 5248878.msg65958663 252510 557798
1761257882 1 320959.msg65955292 2434463 2285939
1761257701 1 5562211.msg65948369 995810 1237156
1761257696 1 5562211.msg65945491 995810 7811
1761257540 1 5456516.msg65958572 252510 3486361
1761257531 2 5563250.msg65956385 407174 3466646
1761257435 1 5560096.msg65949946 3687357 1162389
1761256363 1 5214672.msg65956602 2796662 1852120
1761256354 1 5214672.msg65956648 2796662 65636
1761256083 1 178336.msg65958203 1112467 169384
1761255834 1 5562712.msg65940377 1291828 459836
1761255761 2 5563255.msg65956740 995810 2776678
1761255517 1 3309245.msg65770986 1291828 1059082
1761255150 3 5563163.msg65953578 1080073 1069553
1761254881 1 5554042.msg65678319 3715666 3587984
1761254814 1 5561840.msg65905824 3715666 3587984
1761254696 1 5563149.msg65956381 33156 459836
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (52 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2783 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 24 Oct 2025 04:07:20 AM CEST, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 2 Merit to eisen33 (history) for Re: Последний вагон на север.
On Fri 24 Oct 2025 04:07:08 AM CEST, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 2 Merit to Lannakosa (history) for Re: Последний вагон на север.
On Fri 24 Oct 2025 04:06:28 AM CEST, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 4 Merit to Altryist (history) for Re: Последний вагон на север.
On Fri 24 Oct 2025 03:53:02 AM CEST, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 2 Merit to jor777 (history) for Re: [***] Создаём экосистему токена Chamby .
On Fri 24 Oct 2025 03:22:16 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to lizarder (history) for Re: JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (555 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8032 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 824 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3732285: Pumpsta (history) earned: 9 Merit.
3732402: sc404 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3732435: efla19 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3732496: Charcol (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3732607: adailtonafa (history) earned: 5 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3728470: dem2084
3728545: Alba Renner III
3728749: Silverstonez
3728880: uvaml.io
3728887: LayerzWallet
3728888: Bernd680
3728892: wunderwaffe
3728906: ThrillCasino
3728915: purpgoose
3729034: underwood77
3729104: IndependentRepublicSiberi
3729205: CMD1982
3729214: Supreme Donvic
3729280: Marinnorris
3729450: CyBET_Casino
3729733: Anthony Bill
3729756: LonelyEcho
3729891: tnlol
3729918: Itz-prisigold
3729942: NewRevelation
3729958: Signosmomentum
3729972: OudGozer
3730071: stackerlabsdev
3730073: Keijdn399
3730084: alxSS
3730088: retaur
3730232: SovInd582
3730327: FreeMind00
3730335: Keerook
3730340: PostQuantumBTC
3730381: Galileobeitragssucher
3730494: 2UP.io
3730555: duttoneva
3730622: nathmaroal
3730651: Father111
3730955: Makis Kotzampasis
3730996: Pikiboy
3731047: PepeLapiu2
3731126: Akkaali
3731190: AuchanX
3731248: Abelly
3731565: tomasaurifer
3731567: VIP police talk
3731944: BTCissointeresting
3732269: User_CBCBF
3732285: Pumpsta
3732402: sc404
3732435: efla19
3732496: Charcol
3732607: adailtonafa

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8032
4:0:824
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:723
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14039:13694
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:299
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1412
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3728470:0:1
3728545:0:1
3728749:0:14
3728880:0:1
3728887:0:1
3728888:0:9
3728892:0:4
3728906:0:1
3728915:0:9
3729034:0:4
3729104:0:1
3729205:0:4
3729214:0:2
3729280:0:1
3729450:0:1
3729733:0:1
3729756:1:3
3729891:0:1
3729918:0:4
3729942:0:1
3729958:0:2
3729972:0:4
3730071:0:6
3730073:0:1
3730084:0:18
3730088:3:11
3730232:0:1
3730327:0:5
3730335:0:2
3730340:0:7
3730381:0:1
3730494:0:7
3730555:0:1
3730622:0:2
3730651:4:9
3730955:2:7
3730996:0:1
3731047:1:2
3731126:0:8
3731190:2:5
3731248:0:2
3731565:0:1
3731567:0:6
3731944:0:1
3732269:0:1
3732285:0:9
3732402:0:2
3732435:0:1
3732496:1:2
3732607:0:5

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50429
Sample

Code:

1. 19241 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1076 unique users in 11019 transactions
2. 19241 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 727 unique users in 10485 transactions
3. 18864 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9969 transactions
4. 14749 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 473 unique users in 8521 transactions
5. 13694 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1210 unique users in 4882 transactions
6. 12237 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 684 unique users in 8176 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11203 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 647 unique users in 6419 transactions
9. 11092 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 477 unique users in 6215 transactions
10. 11015 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 557 unique users in 4316 transactions
11. 11000 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 588 unique users in 6394 transactions
12. 10271 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 497 unique users in 5414 transactions
13. 9653 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 557 unique users in 5519 transactions
14. 9423 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 324 unique users in 4828 transactions
15. 9162 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 617 unique users in 4911 transactions
16. 9063 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 506 unique users in 4224 transactions
17. 8982 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 331 unique users in 3170 transactions
18. 8931 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 380 unique users in 3167 transactions
19. 8821 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 436 unique users in 4407 transactions
20. 8675 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 401 unique users in 4717 transactions
21. 8394 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 515 unique users in 3861 transactions
22. 8394 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 571 unique users in 4803 transactions
23. 8273 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 446 unique users in 4904 transactions
24. 8267 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 520 unique users in 4473 transactions
25. 8194 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 561 unique users in 4791 transactions
26. 8032 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 399 unique users in 868 transactions
27. 7783 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 386 unique users in 4112 transactions
28. 7511 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4107 transactions
29. 7377 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 446 unique users in 4086 transactions
30. 7105 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 401 unique users in 3631 transactions
31. 7013 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 567 unique users in 4172 transactions
32. 6583 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 226 unique users in 1688 transactions
33. 6482 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 273 unique users in 2942 transactions
34. 6418 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 365 unique users in 3242 transactions
35. 6304 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 471 unique users in 3496 transactions
36. 6293 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 366 unique users in 3430 transactions
37. 6293 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 916 unique users in 4072 transactions
38. 6169 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 616 unique users in 3452 transactions
39. 6012 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2628 transactions
40. 5976 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 397 unique users in 3469 transactions
41. 5940 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 403 unique users in 3247 transactions
42. 5922 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 450 unique users in 3327 transactions
43. 5899 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 213 unique users in 3463 transactions
44. 5878 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 190 unique users in 3439 transactions
45. 5860 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 513 unique users in 3422 transactions
46. 5847 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 321 unique users in 2685 transactions
47. 5547 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 218 unique users in 3100 transactions
48. 5403 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 198 unique users in 3096 transactions
49. 5258 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 411 unique users in 2589 transactions
50. 5118 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 360 unique users in 2441 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50380. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50381. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50382. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50383. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50384. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50385. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50386. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50387. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50388. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50389. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50390. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50391. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50392. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50393. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50394. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50395. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50396. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50397. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50398. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50399. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50400. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50401. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50402. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50403. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50404. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50405. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50406. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50407. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50408. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50409. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50410. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50411. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50412. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50413. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50414. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50415. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50416. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50417. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50418. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50419. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50420. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50421. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50422. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50423. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50424. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50425. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50426. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50427. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50428. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50429. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26393
Sample

Code:

1. 67711 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 875 unique users in 12175 transactions
2. 64279 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2096 unique users in 27672 transactions
3. 63562 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3281 unique users in 17126 transactions
4. 54921 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3484 unique users in 52764 transactions
5. 54264 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4356 unique users in 31569 transactions
6. 44986 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3544 unique users in 31265 transactions
7. 42062 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2751 unique users in 14785 transactions
8. 41791 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9154 transactions
9. 36663 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2814 unique users in 29701 transactions
10. 36391 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2472 unique users in 13469 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 32559 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1550 unique users in 13431 transactions
13. 31160 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1436 unique users in 10136 transactions
14. 27083 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1646 unique users in 6443 transactions
15. 27039 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2013 unique users in 9851 transactions
16. 26856 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1372 unique users in 6765 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 21209 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1304 unique users in 9082 transactions
21. 20572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6387 transactions
22. 15839 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1913 unique users in 6416 transactions
23. 15318 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 721 unique users in 5618 transactions
24. 15162 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5458 transactions
25. 15071 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1684 unique users in 7028 transactions
26. 14077 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1591 unique users in 3639 transactions
27. 14039 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1008 unique users in 1622 transactions
28. 14027 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1131 unique users in 8585 transactions
29. 13716 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1264 unique users in 7836 transactions
30. 13558 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 511 unique users in 6324 transactions
31. 13258 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1564 unique users in 6716 transactions
32. 12771 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 653 unique users in 3547 transactions
33. 12557 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1301 unique users in 5787 transactions
34. 12477 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1308 unique users in 7065 transactions
35. 12379 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2902 unique users in 6630 transactions
36. 12332 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 801 unique users in 4127 transactions
37. 12317 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1096 unique users in 7440 transactions
38. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
39. 12091 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 797 unique users in 5820 transactions
40. 10151 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 537 unique users in 3918 transactions
41. 9938 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1074 unique users in 5705 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 7929 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3251 transactions
45. 7823 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 998 unique users in 3400 transactions
46. 7701 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 926 unique users in 3390 transactions
47. 7465 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 690 unique users in 6674 transactions
48. 7092 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 561 unique users in 6355 transactions
49. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
50. 6777 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 498 unique users in 3854 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26344. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26345. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26346. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26347. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26348. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26349. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26350. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26351. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26352. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26353. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26354. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26355. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26356. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26357. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26358. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26359. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26360. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26361. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26362. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26363. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26364. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26365. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26366. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26367. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26368. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26369. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26370. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26371. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26372. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26373. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26374. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26375. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26376. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26377. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26378. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26379. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26380. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26381. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26382. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26383. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26384. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26385. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26386. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26387. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26388. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26389. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26390. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26391. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26392. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26393. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 309770 (14.28%)
Tuesday 310033 (14.29%)
Wednesday 310398 (14.31%)
Thursday 331557 (15.28%)
Friday 330098 (15.21%)
Saturday 287822 (13.26%)
Sunday 289364 (13.34%)
Total: 2169042

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: Pmalek on October 28, 2025, 05:03:58 PM

Quote from: katanic97 on October 27, 2025, 11:16:28 PM

Sad sam video saopstenje da je Tudor dobio otkaz. Realno,tesko je bilo za poverovati da ce ostati posle onakvih rezultata u poslednje vreme. Steta,krenuo je odlicno,a i kao sto kazu da je preuzeo ekipu u teskom momentu. @Pmalek sta ti kazes na ovo? Mozda su mogli i da ga ostave. Primer mi je Amorim koji je dobio poverenje Uniteda i evo poceo da redja pobede. E sad,ko bi mogao da zameni Tudora ostaje da pratimo,video sam da neki pisu da bi Klopp mogao da bude novo trener Juventusa,jer nema nijedan klub trenutno

Kao Juventino volio bi da je jedan Juventino uspio i da je ostavio bolji trag ali nažalost nije. Čudna je i bila odluka menadžmenta na početku sezone da mu produže ugovor na još jednu godinu. Prvobitno je imao ugovor do kraja 2025/26. Sad moraju duže da ga plaćaju i dali mu otkaz poslje 8 kola.

Ekipa ne izgleda dobro. Bez ideje su. Niko ne može da objasni šta tačno Juventus želi kad igraju. Sredina je katastrofa a tu nije samo kriv trener. Kao i prošle sezone opet je ista situacija sa novim igračima. Niko se nije snašao i uklopio u ekipi. Ni sam Tudor nije znao ko treba da bude starter a ko ne. Kad gledate kako su postavljeni Napoli i Inter, kod njih igraju uvijek isti igrači ako su zdravi i spremni i ako trener u tom trenutku nema neki drugačiji pristup ili nekog ne odmara. Postoji hijerarhija i zna se ko je starter a ko rezerva. Kod Tudorovog Juventusa to nije bio slučaj.

Ne vjerujem da će Klopp biti novi trener ne samo u Juventusu nego bilo gdje drugo. Mislim da on nešto skroz drugo radi za Red Bull organizaciju. Najviše se spominju Spalletti i Palladino. Radije bi uzeo iskusnijeg Spallettija. Palladino je opet bezvezno jeftino rješenje koje će prije ili kasnije dobiti otkaz pa opet traži novu zakrpu.

Ja sam isto mislio da ce Tudor moci da podigne Juve na neki visi nivo,ali svakako se slazem sa tobom oko ekipe. Evo cim je otisao Juve zabelezio prvu pobedu posle dugo vremena Cheesy

Koliko vidim Spalletti je novi trener,mnogi mu zameraju tetovazu na ruci,navijaci zele da je ukloni (znas o kojoj tetovazi pricam Cheesy

). Kao Napolitano drago mi je sto se Spalletti vratio pa i nek to bio Juventus. Napoliju je doneo titulu posle mnogo godina a verujem da ce uraditi veoma dobar posao sa Juventusom. Yildiz,Vlahovic i Openda mu mogu itekako biti od koristi jer dosta forsira napadacku taktiku. Cambiaso i Kostic po strani dosta brzi igraci. Verujem da ce se snaci

@Porfirii - 8 (perfect prediction) and almost correct for the tie breaker! wow! 1st place WINNER
@julerz12 - 6 2nd Place. winner!
@BIGMOUSE97 - 4
@bisdak40 - 1
@sundaylex1 - 4
@Yoona_As - 1
@bitzizzix - 3
@LokhcfyBit - 3
@f150 - 2
@Fredomago - 3
@Pmalek -3
@tvplus006 - 4
@vivekdhyani1 - 2
@Harkorede - 4
@Dr.Osh - 4
@HOPE_0000 - 4
@Vaculin - 2
@xLays - 2
@VashaUdacha777 - 3
@joker404 - 4
@TypoTonic - 3

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 30, 2025, 11:44:36 PM

People should not be using AI to write, improve, or even just touch up their posts here.

That is your personal moral judgement on the matter, which does not comply with the forum rules.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:00:09 AM

Regarding translations, there is only one rule that somewhat clarifies this subject. It's forbidden to use tools that automatically translate text to other languages that you can then post on Bitcointalk local boards. Interestingly, the rules don't mention anything about using automated translation tools to translate into English.

What we do know is that many of us have used translation tools to translate from other tools into English, openly expressing this, and no one has ever been punished for it.

Quote from: Justbillywitt on Today at 03:25:04 PM

Quote from: KingsDen on October 29, 2025, 06:52:31 PM

There are so many uses of Chatgpt, I think the user is adopting the one which is less dangerous to the community.

But this is the same thing as committing a crime and coming out publicly to admit that you commited the and you expect to be let off the hook because admitted you did it.

Can you think of a more stupid example? Go on, try it, you can do it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 02:35:10 PM

Quote from: hopenotlate on Today at 12:04:28 PM

You might want to check Astrobet.gg, they are relatively new and there is only crash game available on their site as of now but they told here on the forum they plan to also offer slots in the future.

They have a daily 20 bits ( 2000 satoshi) faucet which you can claim every 24 hours and you don't even need your balance is zero to claim it.

As you said, the casino is brand new. Astrobet hasn't even been on the forum one whole month yet. I will wait for at least two or three months before considering adding new casinos to the list.
On first look, it seems like an interesting Bitcoin-only casino that operates without a license and therefore might remain KYC-free. Something that is becoming a rarity in today's time and age. But the more games and providers they incorporate and the more popular the site becomes, the bigger the pressure to start following AML and KYC requirements by regulators.

Astrobet has publicly listed their bankroll on their website. This is a good feature for them and can be a good proof for players to trust. If you scan their bankroll today, it shows 45 Bitcoins. However, they are spending very little money on marketing. So there is still some confusion about what they are trying to do. Their progress is not very good yet. I support your decision. you should take a few more months before listing them as a good casino.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 30, 2025, 07:55:33 AM

I created a test account to try the faucet but I didn't have to submit a phone number. I did enter and confirm my email, though, but that was a personal choice, not a requirement.

Thanks for updating, I think its requirement if want to claim faucet but its really not needed for additional mobile phone number, I try for second day claiming faucet and must re login again as usually any casino gambling can exist for longer time if login with the same browser. Earned around 60 satoshi for second days claiming and looks bit patience waiting the website loading for claiming faucet but overall running well with this casino have offer faucet claiming in daily day.

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 03:45:55 AM

No, mate, you've got it wrong. It says 500 Sats on day seven. You can see the screenshot carefully, where it breaks down how much you get every day. You get 50 Sats on the first day and end up getting 500 Sats on day seven, which is more than half a dollar. Just claim for a few days and play your favorite game with the free money. Since it does not have any wagering requirements, you can withdraw your funds once you have reached the minimum withdrawal amount.

After claiming have amount detail how much satoshi earned for upcoming claim for the first day 50 then second day I earned faucet 60 satoshi, for third day increasing up to 10 satoshi and earn around 70 satoshi but will reset to be 50 satoshi if missing claim in one days or several days? Likely for day 7 will earn 150 satoshi and any one have claimed after seven days will reset to 50 sat or the amount keep increasing. If really increasing I won't miss any one day yet for clauming faucet.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:19:32 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:44:46 AM

Just know that "risk scores" are made up by companies trying to sell them to you, so I assume Blockchair is showing them because they earn from it.

I know, but the reality is that taint is here and it's here to stay. We can do our best to avoid centralized services and not care about their taint nonsense, but the notion still exists. Sometimes I am curious to see just what CEXs think about certain coins I have. Running them through AML risk checkers is one way to find out even if it remains a gamble. As you noticed yourself, one service says the history is fine, another one assigns it a medium risk.

I had several high-risk AML coins. From Sinbad campaign, from eXch, from CM, etc...

I solved this problem by using swap services like eXch and splash.tf (there are others btw) which accept those coins and will give you USDT ETH XMR whatever. You can then swap again using other service to get other BTC back (with less AML risk).

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:05:36 AM

Quote from: bitmover on October 29, 2025, 05:18:03 PM

I have sent a few times BTC directly from eXch to my (and others) binance account, and even other local CEX from Brazil.

Binance was on the list that didn't consider eXch funds as unworthy and so they didn't create issues for people who owned them.

Quote from: bitmover on October 29, 2025, 05:18:03 PM

Funds from eXch only had AML problems after bybit hack, which unfortunately tainted eXch forever...

I forgot the name of that instant exchange that considered eXch funds as dirty and there was also an AML service that rated them as such. All this was even before the Bybit hack.

The problem happened after the bybit hack. Probably, if you send those funds now to binance you will have AML problems.

Quote

I didn't know they provided risk scores for addresses. You just enter an address in the search field and the site displays the AML risk score for it or is there a different tool somewhere on the website that you need to use?

Just enter any address and you will see 2 different risk scores, from different services.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:05:36 AM

Quote from: bitmover on October 29, 2025, 06:51:58 PM

It is a good idea to check de AML risk in blockchair.com. Maybe you were lucky.

I didn't know they provided risk scores for addresses. You just enter an address in the search field and the site displays the AML risk score for it or is there a different tool somewhere on the website that you need to use?

Just enter an address on the site: blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD:

Just know that "risk scores" are made up by companies trying to sell them to you, so I assume Blockchair is slowing them because they earn from it. It's basically an advertisement. Which makes me assume they also track anything anyone looks up from their site (so use Tor: blkchairbknpn73cfjhevhla7rkp4ed5gg2knctvv7it4lioy22defid.onion/bitcoin/address/1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD.
Note that this page doesn't even show inputs and outputs of transactions anymore, but they do show their "Blacklist Report", "AMLBot", "MistTrack", "Risk level", "Scam reports", "Risk score" and more. I'd take those with a huge grain of salt.

Quote from: God Of Thunder on October 24, 2025, 02:51:19 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on October 23, 2025, 03:23:08 PM

I just tried it again and it's the same thing. The pop up appears telling me that the page needs 5-20 seconds to load and nothing happens. I tried it without a VPN and then with a VPN by switching three different server locations around the world. No change. Why can't the faucet page just load normally without tricks, IP changes, and VPNs that may or may not work? As God Of Thunder mentioned, I don't seem to be the only one having issues with it.

Make sure you are not using AdBlock. I don't know why they made the faucet like this, which requires you to wait a little. I assume they did it because when you click on the faucet, it performs several checks before determining if you are eligible for the faucet. I am sure there will be people with multiple accounts and farms with faucet balance since the faucet claims don't have any wagering requirements. So, this makes some sense.

As bitmover mentioned, his problem was solved once he disabled the adblocker. Personally, I did not face this issue, and UserU confirmed that he did not have any issues either. A couple of us confirmed that it works. You may try again and then add Bitz.io in your list

Do you claim bitcoin daily faucets on their website every day, dude? You've probably been doing this for a few months now, if I'm not mistaken, right? Because as far as I know,
there are no more faucets that give 500 sats per single claim, due to the high price value of Bitcoin so far.

What I also know is that I created an account here before, and I can no longer open it because my Yahoo Mail account now also requires KYC,
so I'm not attempting to submit it anymore since I rarely use this account anyway.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:07:25 AM

I made this suggestion a while back and I am not sure if anything was done in that regard or if you plan to do something.
A welcome addition would be a list of CEXs and their treatment of funds that originate from splash. The information should show if their algorithms deem the crypto as clean or if they are known to freeze user accounts, request additional information about the coin's origin, or even confiscate the money. Users will then also know if there are certain CEXs that don't mind receiving deposits of splash.tf crypto.

Is this something you can do?

I think it is very complicated to do this, plus the data would be relevant only after a significant transfer was made in the relation splash.tf funds > xx_CEX. And then, especially for each exchange.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:18:04 PM

If you remember, eXch used to have a list of popular CEXs that didn't flag cryptocurrencies that originated from them. At the same time, there were other centralized exchanges that treated eXch and its coins exactly the opposite, and considered their coins to be dirty. But I don't know what would happen if you used those exchanges and how much problems they would cause you.

Just setting a flag is not the same as how funds related to Splash will be treated.
eXch regularly received requests from other CEX to block funds from certain addresses, as far as I remember, requests from authorities were also shared here. This certainly helped them to recognize where the flag was.

And yes, always using the same address made things easier.

Quote from: Bitz_Casino on October 24, 2025, 02:29:31 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on October 24, 2025, 06:52:10 AM

@Bitz_Casino
I have added your faucet to the list. It's worth remembering that ad blockers can also be the reason why some of your users have issues with the faucet and/or maybe other areas of the site. Keep that in mind so your staff can suggest to turn ad blockers off to see if that will help with the experience.

Thanks for your patience and review!

Really appreciate you adding our Bitcoin faucet to the list Grin

What are the requirements to sign up to your platform?
Do you have mobile support for users like me who mostly like to access casinos on an Android phone?
What is the minimum amount of Satoshis before one is allowed to withdraw it all?

Assuming I get the minimal amount of Satoshis to withdraw them to my account, would I be asked to submit my KYC information to get those Satoshis to my personal Bitcoin wallet?

Thanks and appreciate your time to answers these questions,.as I am a former user of Freebitcoin, but not anymore, so I am looking for a new faucet to get comfy with.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 24, 2025, 03:32:01 PM

I tried to open the sports betting section to see what you offer and the odds, but I couldn't.

Bitz displays the following error message:

Quote

"[ Invalid currency \SATS\ ]
Please try again later

After I changed currency from BTC to ETH, it opened the sports betting page. Why doesn't it allow me to see if if the selected currency is BTC/sats?
Your sports betting layout reminds me very much of Winna Casino. Is there a connection between the two brands? One difference I noticed is the lack of live streaming. Winna has it but you apparently don't.

Thanks a lot for checking it so thoroughly and for adding us to your list! 🙏

The “Invalid currency \SATS\” message appears because some sportsbook providers don’t recognize SATS as a separate currency. While BTC = SATS, not all game providers support that denomination directly yet. You can freely use BTC or USD instead — the system automatically converts your balance from SATS to dollars when needed.
As for live streaming, we don’t use that feature since the provider we work with might not have legal streaming rights in all regions, and we prefer to stay fully compliant with copyright restrictions.

We appreciate your feedback and attention to detail — it really helps us polish things further!

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:18:04 PM

If you remember, eXch used to have a list of popular CEXs that didn't flag cryptocurrencies that originated from them. At the same time, there were other centralized exchanges that treated eXch and its coins exactly the opposite, and considered their coins to be dirty. But I don't know what would happen if you used those exchanges and how much problems they would cause you.

Yes, now I vaguely remember.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 05:18:03 PM

Funds that came from eXch never had AML problems. I think splash.tf funds are probably safe to use as well.

I have sent a few times BTC directly from eXch to my (and others) binance account, and even other local CEX from Brazil.

Funds from eXch only had AML problems after bybit hack, which unfortunately tainted eXch forever...

I don't think I have any UTXO from eXch. But I have sent funds from eXch to Bybit, exchanging one coin for another on eXch and receiving in my bybit account, and I've never had any problems.

Perhaps the ideal would be to send it to a self-custody wallet first if you need to use a CEX.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 21, 2025, 07:08:37 AM

That's interesting that they would only release those features for the mobile versions of the wallet. Cake Wallet 5.5.0 is also available for Windows and can be downloaded from GitHub, but like you said, the new options are probably still unavailable. A 5.5.1 version is currently in pre-release. I don't see a Windows file for download but a Linux one is available.

Generally speaking desktop wallet version is usually lagging behind mobile wallet releases this days, especially on wind0ws os.
I can see Cake v5.5.2 is now available for Linux and mobile version, but you need to build your own wind0ws version manually from source code.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:55:06 AM

Quote from: CryptSafe on October 28, 2025, 10:49:47 PM

In my country, there is no restrictions on casino transactions via fiat through the bank as a matter of fact, I can recharge or loaf my online casino account with my local currency as some casinos support my local currency. I have been able to do that with some casinos and it worked perfectly well. Although the services you have mentioned are all good to use but are not popular in my country here and many gamblers would prefer doing the transaction direct rather than passing through any third party to load their online casino account.

If the country you live in doesn't restrict how you can use your money and you don't mind that the bank knows that you are gambling, then you can take advantage of direct bank transfers if such options exist. But I know that there are countries and banks who have banned offshore online gambling. My cousin lives in such a place. His bank automatically rejects payments to offshore casinos and sportsbooks. He can deposit from his bank account to a local casino or bookmaker, though. The betting syndicate of his country made those arrangements with the nation's Central Bank to limit where bettors can play. That way more money flows their way.

My country is a gamble friendly nation so nobody is restricted from gambling in my country. As a matter of fact, some bank app do have option for online casino funding so that gamblers can easily fund their casino profile through the app so fast and easily. It is no business of the bank if you are a gambler or not as that is not a thing of concern to them. Only what they are after is their money and that is what is only of concern to them.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:18:04 PM

If you remember, eXch used to have a list of popular CEXs that didn't flag cryptocurrencies that originated from them. At the same time, there were other centralized exchanges that treated eXch and its coins exactly the opposite, and considered their coins to be dirty. But I don't know what would happen if you used those exchanges and how much problems they would cause you.

Funds that came from eXch never had AML problems. I think splash.tf funds are probably safe to use as well.

I have sent a few times BTC directly from eXch to my (and others) binance account, and even other local CEX from Brazil.

Funds from eXch only had AML problems after bybit hack, which unfortunately tainted eXch forever...

Quote from: Taskford on Today at 11:59:38 AM

Quote from: virasog on Today at 09:16:17 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:55:06 AM

If the country you live in doesn't restrict how you can use your money and you don't mind that the bank knows that you are gambling, then you can take advantage of direct bank transfers if such options exist. But I know that there are countries and banks who have banned offshore online gambling. My cousin lives in such a place. His bank automatically rejects payments to offshore casinos and sportsbooks. He can deposit from his bank account to a local casino or bookmaker, though. The betting syndicate of his country made those arrangements with the nation's Central Bank to limit where bettors can play. That way more money flows their way.

Yes, one needs to be very careful he is wants to directly deposit or withdraw to you bank account from the gambling site. In case the gambling is illegal in certain part of the world, the banks can easily detect the money flow as where the money is send or received into the account and they can put the account on freeze asking for the source of funds.

I do not use fiat money for gambling but even i never withdraw my coins from the casino into exchanges but some exchanges may not allow funds coming to them via gambling sites. As a precautionary measure, i will usually withdraw funds in my personal wallets and never in the exchanges directly.

Gambling policy shifts so with those changes they better prepare for possible worse scenario that might going to happen.

This is the reason on why I don't want to use fiat upon depositing on the casino since I don't want to experience any issue towards dealing on a currency which is been controlled by the government. I heard about that exchange not allowing gambling transactions, but so far never get any issue when I deposit my profits from casino to top exchange. Maybe exchange would check those large transactions and they won't bother to pay attention those small funds enter on their platform.

Yeah, good point. Using fiat money directly for gambling is quite risky, especially if your country bans it. The government can easily track suspicious transactions and even block your bank account. It’s safer to use crypto instead since it’s more private and secure. Just make sure to withdraw your funds to your personal wallet first before sending them to an exchange.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 09:38:00 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:07:25 AM

A welcome addition would be a list of CEXs and their treatment of funds that originate from splash.

That's only possible if splash uses a fixed sending address. If they send funds from a previous user directly to the next user, you end up with the treatment the original users would have received from a CEX.

However, if they use a fixed address to send coins to users, it would attract unwanted attention.
BTW, is there any history of any instant-exchange that had its funds flagged from No-KYC exchanges?
That it doesn't originate from theft.

Quote from: virasog on Today at 09:16:17 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:55:06 AM

If the country you live in doesn't restrict how you can use your money and you don't mind that the bank knows that you are gambling, then you can take advantage of direct bank transfers if such options exist. But I know that there are countries and banks who have banned offshore online gambling. My cousin lives in such a place. His bank automatically rejects payments to offshore casinos and sportsbooks. He can deposit from his bank account to a local casino or bookmaker, though. The betting syndicate of his country made those arrangements with the nation's Central Bank to limit where bettors can play. That way more money flows their way.

Yes, one needs to be very careful he is wants to directly deposit or withdraw to you bank account from the gambling site. In case the gambling is illegal in certain part of the world, the banks can easily detect the money flow as where the money is send or received into the account and they can put the account on freeze asking for the source of funds.

I do not use fiat money for gambling but even i never withdraw my coins from the casino into exchanges but some exchanges may not allow funds coming to them via gambling sites. As a precautionary measure, i will usually withdraw funds in my personal wallets and never in the exchanges directly.

Gambling policy shifts so with those changes they better prepare for possible worse scenario that might going to happen.

This is the reason on why I don't want to use fiat upon depositing on the casino since I don't want to experience any issue towards dealing on a currency which is been controlled by the government. I heard about that exchange not allowing gambling transactions, but so far never get any issue when I deposit my profits from casino to top exchange. Maybe exchange would check those large transactions and they won't bother to pay attention those small funds enter on their platform.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:07:25 AM

A welcome addition would be a list of CEXs and their treatment of funds that originate from splash.

That's only possible if splash uses a fixed sending address. If they send funds from a previous user directly to the next user, you end up with the treatment the original users would have received from a CEX.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:55:06 AM

If the country you live in doesn't restrict how you can use your money and you don't mind that the bank knows that you are gambling, then you can take advantage of direct bank transfers if such options exist. But I know that there are countries and banks who have banned offshore online gambling. My cousin lives in such a place. His bank automatically rejects payments to offshore casinos and sportsbooks. He can deposit from his bank account to a local casino or bookmaker, though. The betting syndicate of his country made those arrangements with the nation's Central Bank to limit where bettors can play. That way more money flows their way.

Yes, one needs to be very careful he is wants to directly deposit or withdraw to you bank account from the gambling site. In case the gambling is illegal in certain part of the world, the banks can easily detect the money flow as where the money is send or received into the account and they can put the account on freeze asking for the source of funds.

I do not use fiat money for gambling but even i never withdraw my coins from the casino into exchanges but some exchanges may not allow funds coming to them via gambling sites. As a precautionary measure, i will usually withdraw funds in my personal wallets and never in the exchanges directly.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:55:06 AM

Quote from: CryptSafe on October 28, 2025, 10:49:47 PM

In my country, there is no restrictions on casino transactions via fiat through the bank as a matter of fact, I can recharge or loaf my online casino account with my local currency as some casinos support my local currency. I have been able to do that with some casinos and it worked perfectly well. Although the services you have mentioned are all good to use but are not popular in my country here and many gamblers would prefer doing the transaction direct rather than passing through any third party to load their online casino account.

If the country you live in doesn't restrict how you can use your money and you don't mind that the bank knows that you are gambling, then you can take advantage of direct bank transfers if such options exist. But I know that there are countries and banks who have banned offshore online gambling. My cousin lives in such a place. His bank automatically rejects payments to offshore casinos and sportsbooks. He can deposit from his bank account to a local casino or bookmaker, though. The betting syndicate of his country made those arrangements with the nation's Central Bank to limit where bettors can play. That way more money flows their way.

That's good luxury for his side especially that not all government in all parts of the world allows that. Since as what I read on many articles lots of countries are restricting those transaction came from gambling especially to those unlicensed casino operating on their jurisdictions.

But in that case even if my bank allow me to deposit still I won't do it. Since I don't want them to know that I'm participating on such activities since maybe that institution will find way to create an issue.

That's why I always think that its safe to gamble with crypto since we don't need to go on their platform and we can gamble directly for using those crypto's that we like to spend.

Quote from: liuka on October 28, 2025, 10:55:50 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on October 28, 2025, 04:48:53 PM

There are other ways to deposit fiat to an online casino besides direct bank deposits. That's where payment services like Neteller or Skrill can help. You deposit from your bank into your Neteller/Skrill account and then from there to the casino. You can also use prepaid cards like PaysafeCard and similar services if the casinos support them.

You're right, sir. Usually, there are other applications besides banks, such as those for my local currency, where I can deposit using Qris and several others, so I don't have to go through a bank.
This makes it easy to make deposits at 1win because 1win offers deposit options from various financial applications that aren't affiliated with banks.

Gambling is becoming increasingly easier, as need to bother creating a bank account to gamble. Especially if we use cryptocurrency, the process is even easier and faster. 1win does support multiple local currencies, making it easy for gamblers living in different countries to gamble at 1win, as each deposit allows we to choose from several available services.

Now, some casinos offer easy deposit options, such as 1Win. So, we can choose from a wide variety of options, depending on our preferences. I'm not particularly picky, really; it depends on where my money is. If my money is in a bank account, I'll use that; if I'm depositing crypto, I'll do that.

All of these conveniences are designed by casinos to make things easier for their users. The easier it is for us to transact, the more profitable it is for the casino, as users won't have any trouble depositing.

Quote from: liuka on October 28, 2025, 10:55:50 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on October 28, 2025, 04:48:53 PM

There are other ways to deposit fiat to an online casino besides direct bank deposits. That's where payment services like Neteller or Skrill can help. You deposit from your bank into your Neteller/Skrill account and then from there to the casino. You can also use prepaid cards like PaysafeCard and similar services if the casinos support them.

You're right, sir. Usually, there are other applications besides banks, such as those for my local currency, where I can deposit using Qris and several others, so I don't have to go through a bank.
This makes it easy to make deposits at 1win because 1win offers deposit options from various financial applications that aren't affiliated with banks.

Gambling is becoming increasingly easier, as need to bother creating a bank account to gamble. Especially if we use cryptocurrency, the process is even easier and faster. 1win does support multiple local currencies, making it easy for gamblers living in different countries to gamble at 1win, as each deposit allows we to choose from several available services.

You're right, there are many alternative ways to deposit fiat currency into online casinos besides using a bank, as mentioned earlier. Skrill is one such alternative, and I find it a great and popular option in the online gambling industry due to its fast transactions and support for multiple currencies. Neteller, similar to Skrill, is also a common choice for online gamblers for deposits and withdrawals at online casinos. And for 1win, I often make deposits using Qris from one of my apps, and the process is very fast, my deposits are credited within seconds.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 18, 2025, 06:48:55 AM

The exchange is quite good. With more liquidity and lower fees it would be close to excellent.

Liquidity is growing slowly and steady, but I don't think Splash.tf have that high fees compared to other swap exchanges.
Other exchanges often times show one fee but in reality they have something more hidden fees, that is not the case with Splash (from my experience).

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:48:53 PM

There are other ways to deposit fiat to an online casino besides direct bank deposits. That's where payment services like Neteller or Skrill can help. You deposit from your bank into your Neteller/Skrill account and then from there to the casino. You can also use prepaid cards like PaysafeCard and similar services if the casinos support them.

You're right, sir. Usually, there are other applications besides banks, such as those for my local currency, where I can deposit using Qris and several others, so I don't have to go through a bank.
This makes it easy to make deposits at 1win because 1win offers deposit options from various financial applications that aren't affiliated with banks.

Gambling is becoming increasingly easier, as need to bother creating a bank account to gamble. Especially if we use cryptocurrency, the process is even easier and faster. 1win does support multiple local currencies, making it easy for gamblers living in different countries to gamble at 1win, as each deposit allows we to choose from several available services.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:48:53 PM

Quote from: CryptSafe on Today at 04:41:34 PM

With respect to fiat deposit, I don't know where he is from but I think this casino is basically running in the Philippines and if we are to go by that jurisdiction, I will say that it would be somehow difficult to make use of fiat to deposit and withdraw as the government of the nation already placed a restriction on their bank and third parties from processing casino transactions if I am not mistaken and of of lately there have been news of this nature circulating online for quite some time now.

There are other ways to deposit fiat to an online casino besides direct bank deposits. That's where payment services like Neteller or Skrill can help. You deposit from your bank into your Neteller/Skrill account and then from there to the casino. You can also use prepaid cards like PaysafeCard and similar services if the casinos support them.

In my country, there is no restrictions on casino transactions via fiat through the bank as a matter of fact, I can recharge or loaf my online casino account with my local currency as some casinos support my local currency. I have been able to do that with some casinos and it worked perfectly well. Although the services you have mentioned are all good to use but are not popular in my country here and many gamblers would prefer doing the transaction direct rather than passing through any third party to load their online casino account.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 05:03:58 PM

Quote from: katanic97 on October 27, 2025, 11:16:28 PM

Sad sam video saopstenje da je Tudor dobio otkaz. Realno,tesko je bilo za poverovati da ce ostati posle onakvih rezultata u poslednje vreme. Steta,krenuo je odlicno,a i kao sto kazu da je preuzeo ekipu u teskom momentu. @Pmalek sta ti kazes na ovo? Mozda su mogli i da ga ostave. Primer mi je Amorim koji je dobio poverenje Uniteda i evo poceo da redja pobede. E sad,ko bi mogao da zameni Tudora ostaje da pratimo,video sam da neki pisu da bi Klopp mogao da bude novo trener Juventusa,jer nema nijedan klub trenutno

Kao Juventino volio bi da je jedan Juventino uspio i da je ostavio bolji trag ali nažalost nije. Čudna je i bila odluka menadžmenta na početku sezone da mu produže ugovor na još jednu godinu. Prvobitno je imao ugovor do kraja 2025/26. Sad moraju duže da ga plaćaju i dali mu otkaz poslje 8 kola.

Tudor je zajeban lik i neće se posuti pepelom ili držati glavu dole

Ne govorim to ni u dobrom ni lošem kontekstu jednostavno kao činjenicu njegovog karaktera.

Baš zbog toga su mu i produžili ugovor, jer im je rekao da neće vodit klub na Svjetsko Klupsko prvenstvo ako ga ne produže, ili otkaz odmah ili produžetak Cool

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:36:08 PM

If mods and admins feel like it, then they can apply stricter moderation on spammers and start deleting more junk posts. If campaign managers want more quality in the campaigns they manage, they can restrict access to fewer participants.

And this, in my opinion is the best summary of the actions we can take, in order to ameliorate the forum:
a. better moderation
b. stricter campaigns

Quote from: joniboini on October 23, 2025, 05:26:56 PM

I'm fairly certain you'll get a notification if your post is deleted, and if you failed to post it, then the forum won't create your thread in the first place. If your goal is to bring more visibility, you can also move this thread to another board with the move option on the bottom left of your thread, CMIIW.

That's awesome I didn't know I can do that, I will do it now, thanks ^^

Quote from: r_victory on October 24, 2025, 06:00:53 PM

Hey, brother, congratulations on your courage and initiative. Don't give up, and your channel will surely grow. I watched the first episode and thought the animation style perfectly matched the narrative. Over time, you'll get the hang of it; the most important thing you've already done: get started... Wink

Note: As mentioned before, I believe the right board for your topic is Beginners & Help.

Thank you very much, Im glad you liked it

I will move it there.

Quote from: Man of peace on October 25, 2025, 07:12:43 AM

Well, actually I have not gone through your YouTube channel to how good it's,but with the comments I have read here so far,is an evidence that you have done well and that is my wish because we all the beginners are looking forward to a place that can enlightening our mind and give us a better understanding about the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchanges in general..

So I wish to join together with my fellow beginners and those of the higher rankers to say congratulations to you and keep your good work going and also bring out your best in you, because we the beginners are looking forward to receive the best knowledge about bitcoin and crypto space..

Thank you for the encouragement ^^ I will continue on!

Quote from: Perfectbaby on October 27, 2025, 01:32:10 PM

Your presentation works like almost the same thing here on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563357.msg65962678#msg65962678 posted by @Pmalek which I can also recommend newbies or someone who is that interested to study things about bitcoin to follow up with thread and also watch the videos, from the op there are hundreds of video listed on the site which covers lot of area in bitcoin you would also want to know, I strongly recommend it to anyone especially newbies or those who wants to start their career on bitcoin investment and rest of it.

Thank you for this recommendation, this website is awesome and it might help me with some technicalities.
But my videos are on a simpler level, a general introduction to the subjects

Quote from: Pmalek on October 27, 2025, 04:42:39 PM

Don't forget to also edit your first post and include new links to it, like this new intro segment or when the future technology chapter is finished. That's much better than having your videos scattered around in different posts, forcing the viewers to search for them. You can, of course, make a new post and announce that a new chapter is out.

I haven't watched your first chapter video yet, but I have placed it on my watch later list. I will comment on it when I do.

That's a great advice, I will do that. And Im waiting to get your feedback ^^

Quote from: DYING_S0UL on October 27, 2025, 07:03:17 PM

Thanks for the video, mate! I thought it would be boring, but it really wasn't. Must say you have got great storytelling skills and a unique way of describing things. I was completely drawn in and ended up watching the whole 14 minute video. It was indeeed fun, interesting, mesmerizing and most important beginner friendly.

When are you dropping the next one & what software you used for the animation? And best of luck for your channel.. Wink

Wow thank you so much, Im super excited to hear that Grin

more is coming ^^
Im making it on Fresco (ipad) + Davinci Resolve (mac), and I will be posting new segments of the Technology Chapter here as soon as I finish them, so it will build up over time

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:44:28 AM

As I said, the forum isn't gaining in popularity. No forum is. Are we expecting a huge influx of brand-new users coming to Bitcointalk soon? because I am not.

Quote from: Satofan44 on Today at 12:02:07 PM

Almost nobody worthwhile is going to come to a place where 95-99% of the posts are generic junk. Chicken and egg, you got the order of things reversed. If the quality was better, there may be a chance for attracting valuable users. At the current state of things, however, there is no chance.

I think you're both a bit unfair. Obviously forums aren't popular for many reasons. However:

1. I'm seeing the bullshit being posted on X, reddit and other platforms and, especially regarding bitcoin, in this forum you'll see top-notch content from several users, whereas in other platforms you'll literally see only garbage. Yes, there is lot of junk in here, obviously, but I owe a lot of my knowledge to this forum.

2. I don't think it's fair to characterize people as non-worthwile for coming to the forum. I mean, for me, even though you'll laugh, this forum is mostly entertainment. I don't think writting on X is more worthwile. I write for bitcoin because I like it, but there's nothing wrong with writting for unrelated stuff.

3. The most serious discussions for Bitcoin; I thinks I've seen them on GitHub or in some Nostr conversations. I can't compare them with this forum because this forum is called BitcoinTalk, but only one section of the forum is intended for Bitcoin. There is a marketplace, there are off-topic discussions, altcoins' discussions etc. Why there is a gambling section in a bitcoin-related forum? Because it's a forum... It's not supposed to be a place where onlyscientific papers are discussed. I don't like this fact, but I don't care too much, I'm participating where I want to participate.

To conclude: there are many valuable users in this forum from whom you can get great knowledge. It's supposed to relax us, not to make us angry, anxious or whatever.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:44:28 AM

Quote from: apogio on October 27, 2025, 07:46:15 PM

I also agree with @Pmalek that de-merit can be counter effective, but I disagree with the "any" de-meriting system.
...
Having said that, I'm sure that @PowerGlove can adjust the proposed system in a way that can respect both the existing system (by making de-meriting as efficient and fair as possible), but also allowing breaks for users.

I don't see a pressing need for a change. As I said, the forum isn't gaining in popularity. No forum is. Are we expecting a huge influx of brand-new users coming to Bitcointalk soon? because I am not. I don't see why you should log in to the forum one day and see 2150 merits to your name (or less) when you earned 2174 but took a break from Bitcointalk or you were sick, recovering from an accident, etc. Any problem a de-merit system is supposed to fix isn't as serious as it might have been back in the day when merits were first introduced.

Almost nobody worthwhile is going to come to a place where 95-99% of the posts are generic junk. Chicken and egg, you got the order of things reversed. If the quality was better, there may be a chance for attracting valuable users. At the current state of things, however, there is no chance.

Quote from: katanic97 on October 27, 2025, 11:16:28 PM

Sad sam video saopstenje da je Tudor dobio otkaz. Realno,tesko je bilo za poverovati da ce ostati posle onakvih rezultata u poslednje vreme. Steta,krenuo je odlicno,a i kao sto kazu da je preuzeo ekipu u teskom momentu. @Pmalek sta ti kazes na ovo? Mozda su mogli i da ga ostave. Primer mi je Amorim koji je dobio poverenje Uniteda i evo poceo da redja pobede. E sad,ko bi mogao da zameni Tudora ostaje da pratimo,video sam da neki pisu da bi Klopp mogao da bude novo trener Juventusa,jer nema nijedan klub trenutno

Nisam neki ljubitelj Tudor jer mislim da nije neki dobar trener ali Hrvat je pa ga trpim. Uspjeh je da jedan hrvatski trener vodi jedan veliki klub poput Juventusa ipak smo mi mala nacija. Tudor je bio ionako samo privremeno rješenje za klupu Juve-a dobio je malo duži mandat od toga i nažalost to je to od njega. Nevjerujem da će se Klopp vratit iz mirovine jer je u nedavnom intervjuu rekao da mu je dosta tog nogometnog kaos koji imaš prilikom vođenja ekipe. Al možda je i lagao ko će znat.

Rikafip nismo komentirali Dinamo i Rijeku u Europi ovaj put. Moram reć da sam malo razočaram u Dinamo mislio sam da ide glatka pobjeda protiv Malmo-a al to je tako kad unaprijed upišeš bodove. Rijeka na drugu stranu imala sreće s vremenom pa ju je malo posralo kako se kaže, ali nakon tekme jučer protiv Osijeka vidi se neki napradak ekipe. Biti će napeto u subotu na Maksimiru možda izvučemo neki X.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:55:18 AM

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 27, 2025, 10:37:30 PM

Casinos are not a money making machines and although they will let you win and make some profit from time to time, they will do every thing to ensure they will always be the winners/ahead on the long run.

They are money-making machines but their goal is to make that money for themselves and not the players. A guy who works in the casino industry made a nice comparison between casinos and movie theatres in our local board. Gambling & betting is entertainment. It's an entertainment industry just as cinemas. You don't go to the cinema, expecting to walk away with more money than you brought with you. You expect to spend some. Buying a ticket costs money. If you want something to drink or eat, you need to pay for it. You can sit at the bar and grab a beer or a coffee before your movie starts and that also costs money. All that is there for you to enjoy yourself and hand over your money to the business.

The same logic applies to casinos. You bring a little bit of money and they offer you their type of entertainment. Bring some more, and you will get more entertainment. Etc. etc. The difference between cinemas and casinos is that some people somewhere can profit from the entertainment they paid for, but that doesn't apply to everyone.

Casinos are not charity institution they build that business to gain profit from the owners.

They are giving their players chance to win but it always end up that their casino always win from the players played in their platform. That's why there's a house edge since that ensure the long term profitability of the casino operator.

So what players can do is to set good strategy and think about gambling is form of entertainment, If they can walk away with profit then its good but they should not be so greedy to ask for more profits because it will put them on risk to lose all they have.

Quote from: Pmalek on October 27, 2025, 08:47:28 AM

Look at this huge win from free spins on Gates of Olympus! A player spins the reels with $50 and ends up winning $600,000!
https://x.com/Skelhorn/status/1982161938613198929

What a nice max win in the Gates of Olympus 1000 and it was even greated because it was coming from a normal spin. The spins used the double chance feature, that's why the max win is capped at 12,000x from the base bet while it should be 15,000x if it was played with normal spins without double chance feature. No matter how much this player lost before hitting the max win, the winning itslef is a decent win and I think the player made a nice profit while playing the game.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:07:24 AM

/snip

Bitcoin Discussion je dobar pod-forum ali ga dobri posteri izbjegavaju zbog spama.
Beginners & Help je također dobar ali isto tako ima previše spama i najbolji korisnici ga ignorišu.

Meni je većina foruma odbojna baš zato što ima jako puno spama i besmislenih threadova. Kad samo otvorim Gambling Discussion sekciju i vidim naslove poput "To be the best, not just lucky at gambling", "Drinking vs Gambling" i slično, bude mi muka. Ali opet, jasno mi je i zašto ima tako puno glupih threadova. Zato jer se ekipa pokušava uključiti u tu sekciju kako bi ispunili uvjete signature kampanje, a ne žele platiti sudjelovanje u nekom poolu.

Sad sam videosaopstenje da je Tudor dobio otkaz. Realno,tesko je bilo za poverovati da ce ostati posle onakvih rezultata u poslednje vreme. Steta,krenuo je odlicno,a i kao sto kazu da je preuzeo ekipu u teskom momentu. @Pmalek sta ti kazes na ovo? Mozda su mogli i da ga ostave. Primer mi je Amorim koji je dobio poverenje Uniteda i evo poceo da redja pobede. E sad,ko bi mogao da zameni Tudora ostaje da pratimo,video sam da neki pisu da bi Klopp mogao da bude novo trener Juventusa,jer nema nijedan klub trenutno

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:54:11 PM

If there was a casino game that you can beat every time using gambling strategies, it would be banned and casinos wouldn't allow it on their sites. There is nothing like that to earn you money long-term. Betting strategies can work short-term, and maybe you will have success with them.

That’s correct, and if a casino finds out that you’re always winning (not because of a flaw in the game itself, but just because you are a skilled player, and tjis happens a lot with sports bettors) then they will most likely limit your account so you can’t win more than what you are supposed to win

I agree with @Ultegra134 that the merit system isn't perfect, but it has ameliorated the forum in many ways.
I also agree with @Pmalek that de-merit can be counter effective, but I disagree with the "any" de-meriting system.
I also agree with @Rikafip that taking breaks is not only normal but also very likely to happen. Sometimes either for recreation, or other times for more serious reasons. I've seen many respected and well-established users taking breaks.

Having said that, I'm sure that @PowerGlove can adjust the proposed system in a way that can respect both the existing system (by making de-meriting as efficient and fair as possible), but also allowing breaks for users.

In fact, if you consider it, I'm not saying something very wise here. All I'm saying is that the system should be fair and not to judge based on users' away-time.