Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Quote from: Pmalek on May 02, 2026, 03:49:51 PM

If you play at a casino where you haven't undergone KYC verification, that site doesn't have anything to report on you even if they wanted. They only know your email, IP address, device fingerprint, etc. Stick with crypto and move it to and from non-custodial wallets. It remains anonymous. If you move your casino winnings to a CEX where you have undergone detailed KYC, then that's a different matter. They can ask questions that you will need to answer. In that case, they have information they will store on file and can share with your country's tax agency, law enforcement, or whoever asks.

However, many countries are introducing regulations and rules governing the operation of exchanges-specifically, regarding the right to provide services to their citizens-requiring user verification and compliance with AML/CFT regulations. The stated reasons include combating money laundering and other illegal activities. And this trend, by all accounts, is set to “gain momentum.”

This time it's for real, the break is over. Here are your predictions for round 17b :

Name	Prediction
examplens	78 459,00
Pmalek	78 657,00
Hypnotizer	78 799,56
Leahized	78 956,00
cryptofrka	80 000,00
LoyceV	80 350,67
ESG	80 808,08

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Trofo
mv1986
cryptofrka
Slissy
hilariousandco
Porfirii
mitchr4
un_rank
Jayce
Ryu_Ar1
ILuckyGuyI
goodpunt
Mahdirakib
Dump3er
Charles-Tim
avp2306
Zwei
NeuroticFish
slaman29
LFC_Bitcoin
knuckey
igebotz
B1g4udge
koal-84
tiCeR
KTChampions
BABY SHOES
xandry
Strongkored
dzonikg28
Woodie
Pmalek
mole0815
CLS63
famososMuertos
eisen33
buwaytress
arallmuus
ovcijisir
leea-1334
Betwrong
hosemary
Renato297
entebah
VashaUdacha777
klarki
crwth
jeremypwr
Jinetics1111
holydarkness
Rikafip
Harkorede

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Courtesy tag for those eligible who love Free Bets

Code:

Hvala na na jos jednoj detaljnoj analizi Rikafip! Stvarno opet dobre brojke u lokalu i nas slackovic je jednostavno nepobediv Cheesy

10 postova je razlika izmedju nas ali opet velika razlika. Zadovoljan sam opet sa podelom merita. Pmalek opet prvi u podeli,a tu je odma i dkbit98 sto je stvarno dobro. Moje neko misljenje je da ce sledeci mesec biti dosta dosta bolji,imali smo dosta diskusije oko BSFL-a i novim takmicenjima koje su cryptofrka i Trofo spomenuli,a i vratio se SirJohnVonSlotty

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:03:02 AM

Earnbet Casino has a running Bug Bounty Program that anyone can participate in if they know how to spot and report bugs/vulnerabilities.
If the bugs impact deposits, withdrawals, site/game performance, back-end data, then the finders are eligible for rewards.

Bug bounty hunters are encouraged to report their findings to live chat support who will provide you with feedback on how to proceed. You can read about the Bug Bounty Program here if you are interested in taking part.

With this bug bounty program, Earnbet can potentially improve the casino security not only by their own internal security resources but also by community resources. Security is a complex thing to build and it is like a great wall with any point of security weakness can be exploited by hackers. It's important to debug well and fix security bugs before hackers find such bugs and security holes for exploitation.

Likely Earnbet don't expect that their platform has severe security issues to be detected but if such security issues exist, detecting it as soon as possible is truly vital for their business operation and success.

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 07:21:17 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:45 AM

Pa taj će tebe da mijenja. Wink

Gledam tablicu i samo tebe nema u odnosu na tjedan prije. Mislim da je menadžeru svejedno koji rang će biti novi član. U prvom postu svakako nije naznačio koliko učesnika iz svakog ranga želi da vidi u kampanji. Primit će onu osobu za koju misli da mu najbolje odgovora.

ovcijisir nam je trenutno bez signature kampanje. Koliko vidim menadžer ga je uklonio iz nekog razloga nakon završetka tjedna.

Naravno, znam da mene mijenja. Ovcijisir, znam da se ovdje pisalo dosta negativno protiv menadžera moje bivše kampanje ali osobno nisam imao problema. Istina, nekad je isplata kasnila dan-dva ali nikad nije promašio. Malo je manja isplata nego top kampanje ali je dugotrajna pa možda da probaš.

Toliko smo već dugo na forumu da već znamo sve te managere, ionako ih nema previše, koji vode sve te kampanje i već unaprijed znaš što od koga možeš očekivati.
Svatko ima svoja pravila kojih se drži i koja prekopira u svakoj novoj kampanji.
Netko ne voli da se većina postova napiše u 1 danu, netko ne plaća postove u threadovima koji imaju više stitina stranivca, netko plaća ograničeni broj lokalnih postova itd.
Jednostavno, prilagodiš se manageru i njegovim pravilima ili ako se ne možeš prilagoditi tražiš dalje Grin

Ja sam, svih ovih godina, samo jednom imao problem sa 1 managerom jer nisam vidio da sam primljen u njegovoj kampanji, nije bilo pp ili posta u threadu već je samo ažurirao spreadsheet pa sam se pridružio drugoj kampanji a od njega dobio poruku da mu se više ne javljam na njegove kampanje Cheesy

Od onda sve redovno provjeravam kada se negdje prijavim, i pp i thread ali i spreadsheet, zlu ne trebalo Grin

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:45 AM

~
ovcijisir nam je trenutno bez signature kampanje. Koliko vidim menadžer ga je uklonio iz nekog razloga nakon završetka tjedna.

Da, maknuo me iz kampanje bez nekog posebnog obrazloženja, ali nema veze ako nista drugo sada ima nekoliko otvorenih kampanja, pa se prijavljujem sto ima otvoreno

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 07:21:17 AM

~
Naravno, znam da mene mijenja. Ovcijisir, znam da se ovdje pisalo dosta negativno protiv menadžera moje bivše kampanje ali osobno nisam imao problema. Istina, nekad je isplata kasnila dan-dva ali nikad nije promašio. Malo je manja isplata nego top kampanje ali je dugotrajna pa možda da probaš.

Mislim da znam na koga mislis, i ja sam bio u njegovoj kampanji i nije bilo problema. U planu mi je prijaviti se, ali su se pojavili neki tehnicki problemi oko prijave.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:45 AM

Quote from: slackovic on May 03, 2026, 06:15:33 PM

Btw, kampanja iz koje sam otišao traži jednog člana (nije specificiran rang):

Pa taj će tebe da mijenja. Wink

Poznajuci situaciju, vrlo rado ce prihvatiti nekog sa nizim rankom, to mu je dodatno 20tak usd nedeljno. Wink

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:45 AM

Pa taj će tebe da mijenja. Wink

ovcijisir nam je trenutno bez signature kampanje. Koliko vidim menadžer ga je uklonio iz nekog razloga nakon završetka tjedna.

Vor ein paar Tagen hat theymos wieder die neue Liste für die Default Trust 1 Liste rausgebracht für den Monat Mai !

Diesesmal waren wieder 105 Benutzer dafür berechtigt.

Original Beitrag von theymos : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg66677188#msg66677188

Alte Default Trust 1 Liste :

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
igebotz
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
sheenshane
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder

Neue Default Trust 1 Liste :

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
BitcoinPenny
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
God Of Thunder
memehunter

Wieder aus dem Deutschen Bereich dabei sind : bullrun2024bro , efialtis , 1miau , Lakai01 , mole0815 , Real-Duke , Buchi-88 , willi9974 , d5000 und meine wenigkeit.

Hier das genaue Update von LoyceV , Danke dafür !

Quote from: LoyceV on May 01, 2026, 07:41:06 PM

Theymos reshuffled DT1.

Removed:
1. Legendary babo (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Hero Member hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (480 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Legendary LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (11763 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Legendary TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (9634 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Legendary RaltcoinsB (Trust: neutral) (1422 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Staff igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (2245 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Legendary sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1172 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Legendary bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (7396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Legendary anonymousminer (Trust: +37 / =0 / -1) (1417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Legendary notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1566 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Legendary NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (9632 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. Hero Member PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (7014 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Added:
1. Global Moderator mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1731 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Legendary joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (6314 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Legendary Timelord2067 (Trust: +20 / =15 / -0) (1365 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Legendary JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (13344 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Legendary BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +52 / =3 / -5) (1338 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Legendary zazarb (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Legendary mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4518 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Legendary CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (5134 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Legendary 1miau (Trust: +7 / =5 / -5) (7571 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Legendary efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (1558 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Legendary bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (5226 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. Hero Member memehunter (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Par dana nakon sto sam objavio generalni pregled lokalnih boardova, evo i pregleda stanja naseg boarda tijekom Ozujka 2026. Kao i svaki put do sada, pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Ozujak 2026 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

Analiza broja postova tijekom Ozujka 2026

Tijekom Ozujka napisali smo 248 postova sto je pad u odnosu na Veljacu tijekom koje je napisano 289 postova. Unatoc tome, mislim da su to i dalje dosta dosta brojke koje lako mogu ici gore u narednim mjesecima jer nam se polako vracaju stariji clanovi.

Analiza merita za Ozujak 2026

Pad broja postova osjetio se na broju podijeljenih merita koji je nesto manji za Ozujak. Da ne bi bilo zabune, i dalje su to odlicni brojevi jer nam je prosjek veci od 1 merita po postu, sto smo nekad mogli samo sanjati.

Lista svih koji su podijelili te primili merit, te koju standardno predvode Pmalek I katanic97, svaki u svojoj kategoriji.

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Ozujka 2026

I za sam kraj pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu tijekom Ozujka 2026. Na vrhu je naravno slackovic, dok su daleko iza njega katanic97 2. te Daniel91 na 3. mjestu.

slackovic [47]
katanic97 [37]
Daniel91 [30]
ovcijisir [24]
Pmalek [23]
examplens [20]
Rikafip [19]
dkbit98 [9]
cryptofrka [8]
Trofo [7]
BitGoba [5]
paco92x [4]
CroBoy12 [3]
Joca97 [2]
b1ack [2]
RidleyReport [1]
EXMON [1]
inspace [1]
SirJohnVonSlotty [1]
shual1982als [1]
ETZ-Swap [1]
academyviptrade [1]
08CC [1]

Pmalek,

Thanks for the suggestion! I ended up posting it here (and on his github repo) because he has the default setting of not receiving PMs from newbie accounts. I will look at possibly starting a new thread. This basically just allows for brute force guessing of pin/passwords, which could be useful if others don't have the details yet. Thanks!!

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:24 AM

Quote from: Hispo on Today at 12:36:44 AM

I have some questions of those cash rewards you mention on here, specifically on the fact you mention they do not require any minimum wagering in order for people to be able to do whatever they want with it (I assume we would also be able to withdraw it), it makes me wonder how sustainable that is.

I wanted to check that out myself, but the Rewards page won't load on my end. This is what I see and it never changes. I have tried in different browsers and even loading the casino in an incognito window. Turning off my VPN and ad blocker also didn't fix it. Can you open the rewards page normally?

Same here, but "All Rakeback and Cashback rewards at all tiers are Wager-Free (0x)" is great. Some casinos have wagering requirements for these rewards.

Quote from: kikabet on May 02, 2026, 10:29:02 PM

...

Welcome to the forum. Your casino looks like a serious story... Casino games, originals, sports book, crypto futures, and "token coming soon". Pretty interesting...

Good luck.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:24 AM

It's like you have to log into your casino account to see the page, you can't at first, it's like you have a blank screen, after creating an account everything seems normal.

Yeap can be said this is a bit strange anyway. Cheesy

Quote from: Strongkored on Today at 07:57:14 AM

Looking at your Terms and Conditions, under point 8.6 of the withdrawal section, players who win big will be constrained by this rule.
Withdrawal limits don't sound like a pleasant experience for those lucky players.

Damn, this casino seems to limit winnings which does not seem to benefit players.
1x deposit, then the gambler suddenly wins big 10x more than his deposit then the withdrawal will be limited.
If caught using a VPN then the withdrawal process cannot be done.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (56) 14395 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 9709 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5058 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1731 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2771 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 10814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2749 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2633 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (4) 9620 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6314 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8661 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +46 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1988 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2124 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (10) 6544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 1882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2914 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 13344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6173 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 6753 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 9828 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 716 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +46 / =3 / -5) (DT1! (0) 1338 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4314 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3683 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (5) 4518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2673 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4474 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (59) 20660 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +31 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 6319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3058 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1754 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1488 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3714 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3463 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6689 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 4173 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1945 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 5134 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15402 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3332 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +84 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 12270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2267 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2045 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3437 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4021 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3377 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 20358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2656 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2556 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5602 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5649 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +7 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (10) 7571 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3552 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1890 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1313 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3977 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1558 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5536 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 7906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1866 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1558 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5226 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 9701 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3366 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3629575: memehunter (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (8546 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:05:37 AM

What about cases when it's not accurate or when it's incomplete? This forum has some users who are very knowledgeable and know what they are talking about. There are also those who know a bit but not enough. Finally, there are people who have no idea what they are talking about.

Then I would expect the AI to crawl around and fine the most relevant and accurate answer available from all the available content. That will not be so difficult to do as most of the hot FUD topics have been discussed multiple times here and the most correct answers will stick out more.
A newbie talking about something they have no knowledge on every now and then should not be picked up.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:05:37 AM

You can't expect an AI to recommend DEXs and no KYC exchanges that we on this forum know about. You have to understand that we who use such services are still a big minority and not the other way around. Most people will go to Coinbase, Binance, or things like Cash App, Strike, etc.

I understand you, but I expect cash app to not be the first recommendation. I can also expect a good balance of the different sources of purchase. It should not just be regurgitating main stream content, that is how most of the FUD gets spread.

- Jay -

Quote from: Pmalek on May 01, 2026, 04:43:39 PM

Quote from: Slow death on May 01, 2026, 03:55:33 PM

And to add to that, it seems this casino isn't that new; it appears to have been operating for over a year, as can be seen in Reddit comments. From what I understand, this guy @PyLeeT from Reddit is responsible for the casino, and even four days ago he created an online thread about it. So I don't understand why this casino, which has been operating for over a year, only has one Twitter account, even though it was created two years ago.

What do you mean when you say that you don't understand why the casino only has one Twitter account? Should it have more?

Based on Whois records, the domain was created in November 2023. The first web achieve I found for it dates back to December 2024 and it was already a casino at that time. It's possible that it was a different type of site before and not always a casino.

I meant that I don't understand why this casino only has one post on their Twitter account when there are many posts on Reddit, and those posts are from a year ago. Anyway, I wouldn't use this casino. I might be wrong, but I advise people to be very careful. It seems to me that the owner shut down the casino a year ago, then saw that it didn't have many customers and had no idea about this forum, or maybe he gave up on the casino and now must have returned. This is just a supposition I'm making.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:21:22 AM

Aviator is completely based on luck, so any strategy you use may or may not work. The people that have success with it short-term will say it works and the other group will talk about the exact opposite experience. Something I have tried is to wait for three or four low multipliers in a row. For example, multipliers in the 1-1.5x or 2x range. After that, I expect the next round to end with a higher multiplier. But that's just the thing. Sometimes it does and other times it doesn't. At the end of the day, it's just luck.

Waiting pattern Waiting pattern is a sort of practice, not uncommon in the forecasts of future events, which, however, also are chance in their nature. The result of a single spin of a system that makes use of random-number generator is completely independent of the result of other spins that have already been made. The thing is that luck is the only important, indisputable factor considered in relation to this sort of game. Never take a chance and take precautions.

Quote from: katanic97 on May 01, 2026, 07:53:32 PM

Quote from: Rikafip on May 01, 2026, 01:17:54 PM

Evo nam jos jedne signature kampanje, i to za jos jednu mjenjacnicu, [OPEN] 🛡️SecureShift.io/dex - Instant Crypto Swaps | Signature Campaign

Kampanja placa $3 za Sr Member clanove te $5 za Hero/Legendary, te se treba napisati minimalno 10 postova tjedno, sto je ujedno i maksimum koji ce biti brojan za isplatu.

@Joca97 eto prilike da probas uoasti negdje gdje ne bi trebalo biti jake konkurencije.

Neverovatno koliko je novih kampanja otvoreno u kratkom roku. Bas kada smo pricali da je malo novih kampanja otvoreno i da slabo ima mesta u ostalim kampanjama tako je pocelo,kao da smo prizvali nove kampanje i nova mesta. Primetio sam da i nove kampanje koje su izasle imaju dosta OK isplate nego neke starije. Dosta nas sa lokala je promenilo svoje trenutne dugorocne kampanje,tako da sve u svemu dobre vesti. Ja opet kao i prosli put govorim da cu srediti tablicu,ali nikako da stignem,bice veceras,najkasnije sutra,da bude pregledno Cheesy

Da, izgleda da se otvorila sezona kampanja i sad najednom ih ima koliko hoćeš (a kad ih trebaš nema ih ni za lijek) Grin

Da, super je da nove kampanje nude više isplate i nadam se da će to postati novi standard a i da će kampanje biti stabilne i duže trajati jer mi se ne da stalno premještari i tražiti novu kampanju svako malo.
Tablicu uredi kada stigneš, nije problem i nema žurbe, bitno je da pmalek, ti i drugi na vrijeme objave najave novih kampanja a početnu tablicu možeš urediti i kasnije.
Ja i slackovic smo ponovno u novoj kampanji pa ćemo vidjeti kako će biti.

Weekly update (2026-04-24_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1776998616 1 5376945.msg66649692 252510 3704403
1776998276 2 5533985.msg66648943 1107222 1414197
1776998080 1 5571618.msg66648777 1554927 3701214
1776995478 1 5581074.msg66646987 1021018 3491360
1776992254 3 5569451.msg66617652 3363284 3575665
1776989581 1 178336.msg66648440 2393114 1027694
1776989235 4 5581137.msg66649558 2143453 3733653
1776989135 1 178336.msg66649556 998490 252510
1776989126 1 1306983.msg66599418 33156 3752313
1776988981 1 5576757.msg66488936 33156 359716
1776988925 4 5576757.msg66486200 33156 1520746
1776988540 1 5580431.msg66623136 1593137 3532447
1776988521 1 5580431.msg66648536 1593137 2812492
1776988303 4 5581138.msg66649575 2143453 839568
1776988196 5 5581031.msg66645265 140584 85033
1776987534 3 5581138.msg66649575 317618 839568
1776987187 1 178336.msg66649139 998490 33156
1776987054 1 5574659.msg66644466 1532398 2171012
1776986930 2 5581060.msg66646518 407174 3672878
1776986898 1 5268108.msg66647063 252510 2836461
1776986573 2 5491208.msg66646886 407174 2654005
1776986301 1 178336.msg66649139 252510 33156
1776986205 1 178336.msg66648644 252510 1027694
1776986137 2 5580515.msg66633574 11425 3704391
1776985353 1 178336.msg66648091 252510 998490
1776985288 1 178336.msg66648074 252510 35501
1776985142 1 178336.msg66647912 252510 1027694
1776985139 1 178336.msg66649139 1027694 33156
1776984674 4 5580302.msg66623138 33156 521899
1776984652 4 5580302.msg66621776 33156 1298138
1776984550 5 232519.msg66648918 1068464 3498480
1776984390 3 5580227.msg66617610 3570979 3575665
1776983978 4 5580302.msg66620750 33156 1410401
1776983965 4 5580302.msg66618471 33156 1298138
1776983793 1 5580966.msg66649329 1012655 3519432
1776983312 1 5574307.msg66647695 1593137 3532447
1776983086 1 5578753.msg66600446 3686418 3729893
1776982839 1 178336.msg66647539 252510 533583
1776982705 1 5294253.msg66644860 3442536 27470
1776982195 1 178336.msg66647434 252510 2393114
1776982127 1 5581051.msg66646820 1247226 962534
1776982005 1 5581132.msg66649294 2776678 18321
1776981916 1 178336.msg66647416 252510 3704398
1776981256 1 5376945.msg66649275 3729942 252510
1776981135 1 178336.msg66647040 252510 33156
1776981021 1 178336.msg66646298 252510 2752457
1776980983 1 178336.msg66646211 252510 998490
1776980908 1 178336.msg66646209 252510 35501
1776980899 1 5581060.msg66646518 3491360 3672878
1776979296 2 5519917.msg66645521 3729893 3733747
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (56 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2378 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 24 Apr 2026 04:43:36 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Dogedegen (history) for Re: JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas.
On Fri 24 Apr 2026 04:37:56 AM CEST, Don Pedro Dinero (history) sent 2 Merit to danadc (history) for Re: Hilo de seguimiento del precio del bitcoin a corto plazo.
On Fri 24 Apr 2026 04:34:40 AM CEST, bitmover (history) sent 1 Merit to CCECash (history) for Re: New Contest!.
On Fri 24 Apr 2026 03:51:18 AM CEST, r_victory (history) sent 1 Merit to EarnOnVictor (history) for Re: Bitcoin vs Bank.
On Fri 24 Apr 2026 02:57:34 AM CEST, Agathamay (history) sent 3 Merit to Versatile_choice (history) for Re: Make we dey careful the kind links we click online .
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (589 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8546 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 884 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3754232: prodigal son (history) earned: 7 Merit.
3754252: BTCprice.is (history) earned: 18 Merit.
3754391: riscohen4 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3754482: Boston 2.0 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3754527: Kstyle12 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3751788: Nick Finney
3751838: David2026$
3752009: toake
3752048: DeFCoN Network
3752205: Aliciaworld
3752224: Misa Amane
3752237: Niza888
3752313: pscamillo
3752326: asidonline
3752336: Hoke1996
3752423: plump
3752446: BitcoinBTGS
3752453: Primark
3752508: John SwapSpace
3752520: BluebloodCXVI
3752555: KycNotList
3752716: jizzjazz
3752795: criptounlocker
3752872: SoloFury
3753044: Cyborg T-33
3753141: tfbets
3753171: CasinoIndex
3753207: Almhissn
3753246: DEX.fo_off
3753257: SolvoCard.com
3753281: Adanali
3753372: mirekua
3753444: Criptano
3753482: Qatrol
3753487: tas0000
3753546: mobilelegend
3753604: pixelsort
3753630: Anatolii83
3753653: o555355
3753717: devouring-DARKNESS
3753718: BitBrainers
3753736: GlebG
3753854: wizardotools
3753907: Melly610
3753998: 0black0
3753999: ezyk22
3754015: tatscfilho
3754094: Exitoral
3754117: Opiate32
3754212: Djithbit2.0
3754232: prodigal son
3754252: BTCprice.is
3754391: riscohen4
3754482: Boston 2.0
3754527: Kstyle12

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8546
4:0:884
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14350:14395
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2557
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:308
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1485
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3751788:0:2
3751838:0:1
3752009:0:1
3752048:0:5
3752205:0:1
3752224:1:7
3752237:0:4
3752313:0:15
3752326:4:8
3752336:0:1
3752423:0:1
3752446:0:1
3752453:0:5
3752508:0:2
3752520:0:3
3752555:5:16
3752716:0:1
3752795:0:4
3752872:0:1
3753044:0:1
3753141:0:1
3753171:0:2
3753207:3:6
3753246:0:1
3753257:0:1
3753281:0:2
3753372:0:1
3753444:0:2
3753482:0:2
3753487:0:1
3753546:0:2
3753604:0:1
3753630:0:2
3753653:0:1
3753717:0:1
3753718:0:2
3753736:0:1
3753854:0:13
3753907:0:1
3753998:1:4
3753999:1:2
3754015:0:1
3754094:0:5
3754117:0:6
3754212:0:5
3754232:3:7
3754252:0:18
3754391:0:1
3754482:0:1
3754527:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51271
Sample

Code:

1. 20660 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1110 unique users in 11941 transactions
2. 20358 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 748 unique users in 11169 transactions
3. 18891 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9985 transactions
4. 15402 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 479 unique users in 8849 transactions
5. 14395 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1224 unique users in 5180 transactions
6. 13344 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 717 unique users in 8837 transactions
7. 12270 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 583 unique users in 4651 transactions
8. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
9. 11763 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 491 unique users in 6500 transactions
10. 11291 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6455 transactions
11. 11280 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6561 transactions
12. 11141 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 510 unique users in 5805 transactions
13. 10814 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 581 unique users in 6209 transactions
14. 10008 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 330 unique users in 5143 transactions
15. 9828 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 647 unique users in 5332 transactions
16. 9709 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 338 unique users in 3510 transactions
17. 9701 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 461 unique users in 4849 transactions
18. 9650 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 397 unique users in 3364 transactions
19. 9634 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 543 unique users in 4330 transactions
20. 9632 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 531 unique users in 4478 transactions
21. 9620 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 440 unique users in 5259 transactions
22. 9003 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 539 unique users in 4861 transactions
23. 8661 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 571 unique users in 5110 transactions
24. 8654 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 405 unique users in 4478 transactions
25. 8649 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 455 unique users in 5130 transactions
26. 8546 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 407 unique users in 911 transactions
27. 8539 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4856 transactions
28. 7906 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 458 unique users in 4363 transactions
29. 7571 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4118 transactions
30. 7396 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 585 unique users in 4403 transactions
31. 7151 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 404 unique users in 3650 transactions
32. 7014 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 231 unique users in 1802 transactions
33. 6800 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 198 unique users in 3927 transactions
34. 6753 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 381 unique users in 3414 transactions
35. 6689 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 391 unique users in 3656 transactions
36. 6688 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 277 unique users in 3024 transactions
37. 6652 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 946 unique users in 4318 transactions
38. 6544 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 483 unique users in 3636 transactions
39. 6514 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3753 transactions
40. 6339 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 526 unique users in 3681 transactions
41. 6319 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 625 unique users in 3553 transactions
42. 6317 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 423 unique users in 3685 transactions
43. 6314 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 336 unique users in 2990 transactions
44. 6297 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 417 unique users in 3444 transactions
45. 6195 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3620 transactions
46. 6173 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 458 unique users in 3447 transactions
47. 6094 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 204 unique users in 3516 transactions
48. 6057 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 195 unique users in 2634 transactions
49. 5649 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 388 unique users in 2676 transactions
50. 5602 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 455 unique users in 3943 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51222. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51223. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51224. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51225. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51226. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51227. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51228. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51229. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51230. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51231. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51232. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51233. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51234. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51235. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51236. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51237. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51238. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51239. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51240. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51241. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51242. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51243. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51244. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51245. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51246. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51247. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51248. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51249. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51250. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51251. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51252. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51253. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51254. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51255. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51256. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51257. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51258. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51259. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51260. 1 Merit received by 0trace (#3751018) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51261. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51262. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51263. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51264. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51265. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51266. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51267. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51268. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51269. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51270. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51271. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26617
Sample

Code:

1. 73931 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 903 unique users in 12775 transactions
2. 68403 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2204 unique users in 29492 transactions
3. 67229 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3328 unique users in 17724 transactions
4. 59922 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3604 unique users in 57712 transactions
5. 58792 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4625 unique users in 33683 transactions
6. 51183 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3706 unique users in 35327 transactions
7. 44484 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2884 unique users in 15735 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38236 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2961 unique users in 31007 transactions
10. 37878 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2524 unique users in 14109 transactions
11. 34754 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1591 unique users in 13960 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 32310 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1477 unique users in 10348 transactions
14. 30892 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2129 unique users in 10819 transactions
15. 29042 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1436 unique users in 7633 transactions
16. 28012 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1686 unique users in 6612 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25827 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1316 unique users in 11615 transactions
19. 23572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6457 transactions
20. 22991 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1377 unique users in 9491 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 17584 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1734 unique users in 3975 transactions
23. 16345 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 749 unique users in 6057 transactions
24. 16176 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1991 unique users in 6574 transactions
25. 16164 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1731 unique users in 7433 transactions
26. 15986 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 545 unique users in 7524 transactions
27. 15603 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1178 unique users in 9108 transactions
28. 15253 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5485 transactions
29. 14628 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1310 unique users in 8280 transactions
30. 14350 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1105 unique users in 1758 transactions
31. 14176 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1668 unique users in 7396 transactions
32. 13549 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3038 unique users in 7148 transactions
33. 13354 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3614 transactions
34. 13302 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1342 unique users in 7391 transactions
35. 13256 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1305 unique users in 5879 transactions
36. 13159 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1140 unique users in 8034 transactions
37. 13077 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 827 unique users in 6146 transactions
38. 12962 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 831 unique users in 4249 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11478 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1171 unique users in 6324 transactions
41. 10583 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 545 unique users in 3963 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8352 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1047 unique users in 3630 transactions
45. 8306 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 755 unique users in 7257 transactions
46. 8183 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 578 unique users in 7072 transactions
47. 8089 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 329 unique users in 3303 transactions
48. 8026 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 951 unique users in 3512 transactions
49. 7793 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 519 unique users in 6199 transactions
50. 7263 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 521 unique users in 4103 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26568. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26569. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26570. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26571. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26572. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26573. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26574. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26575. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26576. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26577. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26578. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26579. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26580. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26581. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26582. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26583. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26584. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26585. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26586. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26587. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26588. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26589. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26590. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26591. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26592. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26593. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26594. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26595. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26596. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26597. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26598. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26599. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26600. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26601. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26602. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26603. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26604. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26605. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26606. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26607. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26608. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26609. 1 Merit sent by 0black0 (#3753998) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26610. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26611. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26612. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26613. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26614. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26615. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26616. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26617. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 330622 (14.37%)
Tuesday 329248 (14.32%)
Wednesday 330076 (14.35%)
Thursday 350306 (15.23%)
Friday 348143 (15.14%)
Saturday 303511 (13.20%)
Sunday 307311 (13.36%)
Total: 2299217

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: Pmalek on April 26, 2026, 07:53:02 AM

Quote from: UmerIdrees on April 25, 2026, 09:19:01 PM

I think all the popular wallet services should have their Android and iOS versions too, and then this type of fake wallets scam will be minimised to a great extent.

Perhaps, but you can't protect people from themselves. You would still have those that visit app stores and search for wallets there instead of going through official sources and links on official websites. Scammers distribute fake apps over social media, in ads, and over email and enough people fall for it. If they didn't, the scammers wouldn't bother wasting their time to clone and distribute their phishing apps.

Well, I would suggest everyone (and I personally follow too) to visit the official wallet websites and from there click on the Play Store or App Store link, and that will take them to the right app, and they won't end up installing any fake app. This is more true for the financial related apps where money is involved, as scammers and hackers focus on those apps that can make them money if they are able to hack into people's crypto accounts.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:57:27 PM

What’s the source of the evidence?
Peer-reviewed research from Cambridge University, ERCOT, Human Rights Foundation, and 22+ academic studies.

I would not want bitcoin to be treated as an academic topic, if they are going to use sources for their information it should be from bitcoin communities like this one or some other bitcoin related forum. That should be more accurate than academic studies.

I asked about the FUD that bitcoin is too expensive and this was my answer -

Quote

Yes, Bitcoin's unit price can seem high at first glance, and that's a common concern for new investors. What many people don't realize is that Bitcoin is infinitely divisible — you don't need to buy a whole bitcoin. You can purchase as little as $1 worth through apps like Cash App, Strike, or Coinbase. Bitcoin can be divided into 100 million smaller units called satoshis (sats). Think of it like buying a fraction of a share of expensive stock like Berkshire Hathaway. The psychological barrier of the unit price doesn't change the underlying investment math. Whether you buy $100 of Bitcoin at $50K per coin or $100K per coin, your percentage gains and losses are identical. Many successful Bitcoin investors started by dollar-cost averaging small amounts weekly or monthly rather than buying large chunks at once.

Bitcoin is very divisible but not infinitely and I also do not like the idea of cash app being the first recommendation of where to buy from. The other parts of the answers are correct and generic, for a software dedicated to correcting FUD, it should be as accurate as possible and should allow for review of answers to make them better.

- Jay -

Quote from: Husna QA on April 02, 2026, 06:42:47 PM

DT Member - Mei 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 105 user (bertambah 2 DT1 baru dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama:

Code:

-----

Daftar Baru:

Code:

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia:

Code:

AakZaki
Husna QA
abhiseshakana
YOSHIE

Sumber: theymos | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg66677188#msg66677188

Quote from: ➥ Theymos DT update [thread]

Maggio 2026

Lista New Users:

Code:

theymos (CONFIRMED)
HostFat (CONFIRMED)
gmaxwell (CONFIRMED)
OgNasty (CONFIRMED)
Vod (CONFIRMED)
vapourminer (CONFIRMED)
mprep
Foxpup (CONFIRMED)
philipma1957 (CONFIRMED)
Cyrus (CONFIRMED)
Welsh (CONFIRMED)
ibminer (CONFIRMED)
d5000 (CONFIRMED)
joker_josue
Pmalek (CONFIRMED)
Mitchell (CONFIRMED)
albon (CONFIRMED)
wwzsocki (CONFIRMED)
Timelord2067
jeremypwr (CONFIRMED)
gbianchi (CONFIRMED)
EFS (CONFIRMED)
stompix (CONFIRMED)
hilariousandco (CONFIRMED)
buckrogers (CONFIRMED)
Buchi-88 (CONFIRMED)
Lesbian Cow (CONFIRMED)
willi9974 (CONFIRMED)
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish (CONFIRMED)
achow101 (CONFIRMED)
DaveF (CONFIRMED)
examplens (CONFIRMED)
nutildah (CONFIRMED)
irfan_pak10 (CONFIRMED)
BitcoinPenny
yahoo62278 (CONFIRMED)
bitbollo (CONFIRMED)
zazarb
mocacinno
Real-Duke (CONFIRMED)
klarki (CONFIRMED)
LoyceV (CONFIRMED)
The Sceptical Chymist (CONFIRMED)
SFR10 (CONFIRMED)
BitcoinGirl.Club (CONFIRMED)
holydarkness (CONFIRMED)
Lafu (CONFIRMED)
tweetious (CONFIRMED)
AakZaki (CONFIRMED)
giammangiato (CONFIRMED)
buwaytress (CONFIRMED)
crwth (CONFIRMED)
Ale88 (CONFIRMED)
Vispilio (CONFIRMED)
hosemary (CONFIRMED)
krogothmanhattan (CONFIRMED)
JollyGood (CONFIRMED)
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack (CONFIRMED)
El duderino_ (CONFIRMED)
KTChampions (CONFIRMED)
Trofo (CONFIRMED)
icopress (CONFIRMED)
JeromeTash (CONFIRMED)
logfiles (CONFIRMED)
Bitcoin_Arena (CONFIRMED)
GazetaBitcoin (CONFIRMED)
tvplus006 (CONFIRMED)
mole0815 (CONFIRMED)
DdmrDdmr (CONFIRMED)
shahzadafzal (CONFIRMED)
Lakai01 (CONFIRMED)
Husna QA (CONFIRMED)
fillippone (CONFIRMED)
cryptofrka (CONFIRMED)
abhiseshakana (CONFIRMED)
The Cryptovator (CONFIRMED)
lovesmayfamilis (CONFIRMED)
DireWolfM14 (CONFIRMED)
1miau
Little Mouse (CONFIRMED)
YOSHIE (CONFIRMED)
inspace (CONFIRMED)
jokers10 (CONFIRMED)
Awaklara (CONFIRMED)
efialtis
geophphreigh (CONFIRMED)
zasad@ (CONFIRMED)
Rikafip (CONFIRMED)
Etranger (CONFIRMED)
Stalker22 (CONFIRMED)
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner (CONFIRMED)
Charles-Tim (CONFIRMED)
Lillominato89 (CONFIRMED)
Free Market Capitalist (CONFIRMED)
YodasRedRocket (CONFIRMED)
God Of Thunder (CONFIRMED)
memehunter

. . . .

Lista Utenti Italiani:

USER..........	...DT...	.DT.April 2026.	BPIP	Ninjastic
Ale88	(DT)	no
arulbero		no
babo		no
coinlocket$		no
fillippone	(DT)	no
gbianchi	(DT)	no
bastisisca		no
bitbollo	(DT)	no
giammangiato	(DT)	no
mendace		no
mars78		no
simpic		no
Lillominato89	(DT)	no

Link Utili:

This month 105 users were eligible.

Old:

Code:

New:

Code:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:43:39 PM

Quote from: Slow death on Today at 03:55:33 PM

What do you mean when you say that you don't understand why the casino only has one Twitter account? Should it have more?

Maybe he meant Reddit account and not the twitter account, that there should have been more persons managing the casino and they should have separate Reddit accounts where the players can complain or ask any query. However, you are right that the casino would usually have a single twitter handle and also a single point of contact for customer queries (although that may be managed by multiple peoples at the backend).

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:57:27 PM

~snip

Nice of you sharing this information here but if I'm being realistic if I ever have any doubts or something I probably perceive to be a false claim about bitcoin my first and best bet would be to create a topic about it here and I'm gonna be likely getting one of the best sets of ideas and replies.

I think in most cases newbies that claim to be suffering from the whole FUD stuff are actually the ones that are barely buying or even selling most are all talk on social media platforms like X.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 30, 2026, 04:04:42 PM

We had another huge win on Earnbet Casino. A $1 spin resulted in a $50,000 win on Possessed, a slot game by NoLimit City. This is a game with extreme volatility, where 50000 times the bet is the maximum win.

You can watch the replay of this lucky round below:
https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2049845716277694754

That's quite a luck that guy had. If I had that win, I'd take a month-long break for sure. Cheesy

It's no surprise, though. NoLimit's slot games have those crazy multipliers that you can't get on any other slot providers. Quite scary to try out these high volatility games, especially for someone like me who's got a very thin bankroll. I might only last 1 microsecond on their slots. lol

Quote from: Pmalek on April 30, 2026, 07:25:40 AM

I have a somewhat different experience than you. A few years ago, one casino offered me no-deposit free spins on one particular slot game as part of a promo campaign. I think it was something small, like 10 free spins worth $0.10/spin. The interesting part is that I triggered a big multiplier of hundreds of x with my first spin. I was certain that I would be able to convert that bonus money into real money. The winnings came with a 35x wagering requirement, though. Eventually I lost it all, trying to meet the requirements. It shows that it's possible to win but very difficult to meet playthrough requirements and turn the bonus into real and withdrawable money.

Yes, I think that's the possible setup. They allow you to win only because they know you'll eventually burn all those winnings trying to meet the wagering requirement. Grin

Can't blame the casino, though, since it's their business model and that's usually how they profit. If all crypto-casinos just let everyone win on bonuses with no wagering requirements, no one else would be left playing, we'd all retire rich. lmao

Quote from: LoyceV on April 29, 2026, 03:41:20 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on April 29, 2026, 03:22:08 PM

Logpaste seemed like a simpler and automated solution but it seems a thing of the past now.

They may or may not come back. Whois showed a change was made to their expired domain name yesterday. It's also on Github, but requires "S3 compatible storage", and I don't know if I can run that on my simple VPS.

For S3 compatible storage I think you can use Backblaze B2 which is very cheap for $6.95 / TB / mo, just to keep the storage you need and your VPS for the system

https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/pricing

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:50:57 PM

Quote from: Dump3er on Today at 01:06:34 PM

<Snip>

I am glad you enjoyed it. Just for the info, there is a second part to that recovery video. It's actually a two-parter. You can watch the conclusion here.
Joe seems to have become an expert in physically manipulating the Trezor One. He knows his way around its chip very well at this point.

I hope we will see more of his great work in the future.

Yes I will watch the second one shortly, but if there is anyone knowledgeable around here, or maybe you know it, how does scanning the chip mini fraction by mini fraction and then find a weak spot? I can't get my head around that why a weak spot gives him some type of access or connection? I think he said is filtering the chip structure in regards to material and that left me puzzled how this could be an identifiable backdoor. I thought it is all about algorithms and encoding, but can the quality or consistency of the material offer a vector for attacks?

Its the last day of April, meaning time for yet another brief monthly overview, and this time for March 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards but are part of this overview.

Post activity per local board during March 2026

During the last month, 13524 posts were made across local boards, which is an increase slight compared to February's 12919 posts. Top 3 boards reemained the same as month before, and this increase mainly happened there.

Active members per local board during March 2026

During March, 1305 forum members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards, making it a small decrease compared to February, during which 1335 members were active. Nigerian boards remained at the top, but this time Russian came aalittle bit closer than before, while all the other local boards are far behind.

Local board members per amount of posts during March 2026

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Polish is the leader with 67% of such members, while at the same time Nigerian had the lowest, only 16%.

In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Russian board with 46%, while on the other side is Plish local that had only 17% of such members.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Turkish is the leader with 53% while Romanian didn't have a single member who wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during March 2026

7089 merit was shared across local board during March, which is a big drop compared to February's 7901 and is spread among majority of the boards. At the same, the most merited one (Nigerian) even managed to increase their merit shared compared to February and is one of the rare ones that managed to do that.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during March 2026

During March, average merit per post across local boards was 0.52 which is a decrease compared to February's 0.61, which is expected considering the increase of the amount of posts and in the same time decrease of sent merit. Despite that, the average is still very good, and majority of local boards can't complain about that. Having said that, some local boards are still undermerited.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during March 2026

During March 517 members sent while 602 received merit which is a expected decrease compared to February (535 senders, 615 receivers).

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during March 2026

No surprise here-Romanian board once again at the top, and this time they are back at 60%, but this time they have Italian board just behind them with a very high 55%, which is even more impressive considering their number of posts.

Merit per transaction across local boards during March 2026

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habit of local boards

And in the end of the overview, lists of the most active local boards members. joker_josue from Portuguese local boatrd is back at the top with 135 posts, followed by klarki from Russian boartd with 131 post and mandown from Turkish local who wrote 128 posts. GG guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. klarki [131]	\|	1. mole0815 [93]	\|	1. mandown [128]	\|	1. babo [42]	\|	1. joker_josue [135]	\|	1. Porfirii [45]	\|
2. jokers10 [119]	\|	2. Soonandwaite [64]	\|	2. Yabani [106]	\|	2. Italian Panic [38]	\|	2. sabotag3x [91]	\|	2. famososMuertos [43]	\|
3. safar1980 [115]	\|	3. Lakai01 [59]	\|	3. execijutiere [79]	\|	3. fillippone [34]	\|	3. alegotardo [48]	\|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [23]	\|
4. Numeral [107]	\|	4. cygan [51]	\|	4. yenerbatmaz [77]	\|	4. Plutosky [30]	\|	4. TryNinja [41]	\|	4. Hispo [23]	\|
5. Julien_Olynpic [104]	\|	5. Buchi-88 [43]	\|	5. Hvdv [62]	\|	5. kennycryptoitalia [22]	\|	5. criptoevangelista [39]	\|	5. Filicius [20]	\|
6. zasad@ [86]	\|	6. Koal-84 [41]	\|	6. Phoenix Anka [60]	\|	6. Ale88 [21]	\|	6. Forsyth Jones [38]	\|	6. darxiaomi [14]	\|
7. xandry [77]	\|	7. MaxMueller [40]	\|	7. Mustang Shelby [56]	\|	7. georgino22222 [16]	\|	7. bitmover [33]	\|	7. Crystal-Trade.org [14]	\|
8. Alex077 [68]	\|	8. Unknown01 [38]	\|	8. kriminall [54]	\|	8. Paolo.Demidov [13]	\|	8. Pumared [31]	\|	8. danadc [13]	\|
9. tvplus006 [66]	\|	9. MinoRaiola [37]	\|	9. blomen [54]	\|	9. Niekko [13]	\|	9. Paredao [29]	\|	9. darbitmobilerecovery [13]	\|
10. internetional [65]	\|	10. Real-Duke [34]	\|	10. lodocus [49]	\|	10. Cassius55 [12]	\|	10. rdluffy [25]	\|	10. LUSUBY [11]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [89]	\|	1. G.Seed [16]	\|	1. cryptoaddictchie [34]	\|	1. slackovic [47]	\|	1. Biirakedee [95]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [35]	\|
2. Husna QA [58]	\|	2. patrickus [14]	\|	2. arwin100 [29]	\|	2. katanic97 [37]	\|	2. Floxynice [83]	\|	2. yhiaali3 [29]	\|
3. Rashlyowl [38]	\|	3. winspiral [13]	\|	3. Peanutswar [28]	\|	3. Daniel91 [30]	\|	3. Jubilee58 [54]	\|	3. khaled0111 [27]	\|
4. AakZaki [36]	\|	4. oscar2000 [9]	\|	4. fullfitlarry [25]	\|	4. ovcijisir [24]	\|	4. Africolo [52]	\|	4. OmegaStarScream [12]	\|
5. mu_enrico [33]	\|	5. Danydee [7]	\|	5. julerz12 [24]	\|	5. Pmalek [23]	\|	5. Agbamoni [51]	\|	5. GxSTxV [7]	\|
6. TedMosby [28]	\|	6. rony_btc [7]	\|	6. bhadz [23]	\|	6. examplens [20]	\|	6. PremiumcryptoHub [45]	\|	6. Ochan_yazo_tochant [7]	\|
7. joniboini [25]	\|	7. GrosWesh [6]	\|	7. xLays [23]	\|	7. Rikafip [19]	\|	7. Mr Reporter [43]	\|	7. AnisEverRise [7]	\|
8. masulum [23]	\|	8. Jean_Michel [6]	\|	8. gunhell16 [22]	\|	8. dkbit98 [9]	\|	8. Cryptomultiplier [39]	\|	8. hugeblack [3]	\|
9. MAAManda [22]	\|	9. Remsjack [5]	\|	9. Mr. Magkaisa [22]	\|	9. cryptofrka [8]	\|	9. SatoPrincess [37]	\|	9. RedFlix [3]	\|
10. taufik123 [21]	\|	10. TryNinja [4]	\|	10. lionheart78 [21]	\|	10. Trofo [7]	\|	10. ZeroVinsonN [33]	\|	10. 0x256 [2]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [10]	\|	1. JSRAW [31]	\|	1. cryptosize [50]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [9]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [48]	\|	1. Bd officer [21]	\|
2. TryNinja [4]	\|	2. Bitcoin Smith [27]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [27]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	\|	2. JunaidAzizi [38]	\|	2. DYING_S0UL [20]	\|
3. pawel7777 [1]	\|	3. vivekdhyani1 [24]	\|	3. alani123 [15]	\|	3. TryNinja [4]	\|	3. Junii [31]	\|	3. Crypto Library [14]	\|
4. EXMON [1]	\|	4. pawanjain [21]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [7]	\|	4. UsdtBucuresti [2]	\|	4. MusaPk [26]	\|	4. Mahiyammahi [11]	\|
5. academyviptrade [1]	\|	5. Cointikka [14]	\|	5. apogio [2]	\|	5. jedaite [1]	\|	5. Shussainshah [24]	\|	5. Z_MBFM [8]	\|
6. may7723 [1]	\|	6. TheUltraElite [6]	\|	6. Dimitris [1]	\|	6. inspace [1]	\|	6. HustleZ [24]	\|	6. Shishir99 [6]	\|
	\|	7. IIrik11 [6]	\|	7. academyviptrade [1]	\|	7. academyviptrade [1]	\|	7. Rustam Meraj [23]	\|	7. Regbon134 [4]	\|
	\|	8. henmark [3]	\|	8. Jesus_Christ 2.0 [1]	\|	8. b1ack [1]	\|	8. Gladitorcomeback [22]	\|	8. BlackHatSojib [3]	\|
	\|	9. M47AK16 [3]	\|		\|	9. Botchain [1]	\|	9. ThemePen [20]	\|	9. SpaceSuite [2]	\|
	\|	10. TSen [3]	\|		\|		\|	10. GbitG [19]	\|	10. Btcloop [2]	\|

Quote from: Pmalek on March 31, 2026, 03:22:40 PM

Joe Grand has released a two-part video series where he is hacking hardware wallets, attempting to recover lost coins for his clients. I haven't seen the whole thing yet, but it seems that his sole focus in this video is on Trezor One's, a device he has had success with in the past. Multiple people with similar stories: they lost PINs or seeds.

You can watch it here if you are interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhJoJRqJ0Wc

Thanks for sharing this video, this man is a legend!

I didn't know about him before I found out about this thanks to your post and it is unbelievable to see what he is able to do to solve the problems. Or not problems as he said. Grin

He said "ok this is not a problem, it's a puzzle, let's figure this out, I have the tools, I have the skills.". What I found inconceivable is how he scanned over that chip with his scanning machine to find weak spots that allow him to get into it. I still don't understand it technically, but this is how he described it. Those chips have weaker spots and stronger spots.

When you see a video like this, you would often times think that it must be staged to some degree and some parts are fake, but at 8:30 you can see that the woman is not an actor. Her eyes are so serious and the trouble is real! The same for all the other guys, the one almost collapsing when he found out his friend has stolen it all. It's heart-breaking and I think everyone who has lost a valuable thing in life knows what it must mean to a person losing a fortune when they are not ultra rich.

And I like the guy at 15:00 when he was asked whether he would have sold earlier if his coins weren't believed to be lost. He immediately answered yes, he would have sold at a lower price and now he is happy that he couldn't, but could recover the coins. Grin

Joe Grand says a lot of true things about his job in regards to emotional pressure because he can change lives with his skills, but can as well find out that there is a soul falling apart on the other side when they find out it can't either be done or the wallet has been emptied by someone else apparently. Or when he accidentally destroys a wallet. The scene where the couple that lost their newborn got the money back, it must feel overwhelming if you are the one to have recovered that wallet with the best news possible. Everything is there and appreciated in price.

The amount of work that Grand puts into preparation, do test wallet after test wallet to make 99.9% sure that it is not him who messes up a real wallet is crazy. He is one of those guys I believe deserve to be rich and what I liked so much about him during the video is that you can tell from his body language that he would never scam anyone. A good portion of his motivation is empathy and altruism and this is why he says there is serious mental pressure for him. I enjoyed the video because of his mood and passion and authenticity.

Thanks Pmalek and it is a video I will have in the back of my head from now on because there are people who mess up their hardware wallets.

For all the real crypto guys around here, I think this video is a must watch!

Quote from: Pmalek on April 28, 2026, 08:36:02 PM

@holydarkness

I have done some more research using the browser inspect tool based on prompts by ChatGPT. Shuffle was trying to hide the provider name.
I am pretty sure that Shuffle uses Sportradar. There are several hints for this. I will paste some of the responses from ChatGPT after I supplied the bot with the data from Inspect Element and the network tab.

Quote

Final technical conclusion
Shuffle sportsbook architecture:
✔ Data provider:

Sportradar (confirmed via sr: IDs)

✔ Odds model:

probability-driven automated pricing engine (Sportradar ORS-style)

✔ Frontend:

Shuffle custom GraphQL middleware

Quote

What this means in plain English

Shuffle is NOT:

❌ a fully in-house sportsbook
❌ a Betby / Altenar skin (no evidence of those)
❌ directly exposing a white-label API in browser

Instead it is:

A custom sportsbook interface built on top of a Sportradar-powered data + pricing system.

Quote

Confidence breakdown (final)
Component   Confidence
Sportradar data feed   99%
Automated trading/probability pricing system   90%
Betby / Altenar involvement   5% (unlikely now)
Fully in-house sportsbook   1%

Quote

Final answer to your original question

Shuffle’s sports provider is Sportradar (Betradar infrastructure), integrated through a custom Shuffle GraphQL layer.

Sportradar is the biggest in fraud detection. They work with the NBA, FIFA, etc. Most of the time sportsbooks don't do anything with these suspicious matches even though they know that something wasn't right.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:33:06 PM

Did my mention of the service cause the issue with the images breaking?

Yes, and I can't believe you did it again by quoting the URL again Tongue

Quote

Did I shoot myself in the foot and then asked who shot me?

Kinda

All I look for is the URL, and assume you post a working link Wink

Quote

If it did, can it happen again the next time the website is mentioned somewhere?

Only if it's you who posts it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:22:08 PM

Logpaste seemed like a simpler and automated solution but it seems a thing of the past now.

Quote from: Haunebu on April 28, 2026, 03:57:54 PM

I noticed that BC.Game is still part of the table and I suggest removing it since they are a proven scam site since ages and have been screwing over gamblers selectively just like other scam sites such as 1xbit etc.

There are one or more multiple confirmed scam accusations against them. They are still relatively popular outside this forum though, but they have lost most of their credibility within this forum.

So sad to see such a a casino which used to be so good to become a scam . I think they were sold to some other people.

@Pmalek, the minimum of l0tt0 is outdated:

They have a minimum of $10 in each currency.

Quote

Is there a minimum withdrawal amount?

Yes. The minimum withdrawal amount is $10.00 per currency.

Current equivalent values are:
Bitcoin Icon
0.00013046

Litecoin Icon
0.17804226

Dogecoin Icon
94.41549812

Solana Icon
0.11919347
https://www.l0tt0.com/faq

Quote from: Mahdirakib on Today at 09:25:54 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on April 28, 2026, 04:46:58 PM

I got a reply from Tim, explaining and concluding one of our previous debate of the importance of the flag by Betby [me insisting it works as a considerable amount of evidence v. him telling me that Betby's flag is irrelevant to the case] because Shuffle doesn't use Betby. My quick visit to ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and raking my chat evidence with them indeed prove that they're not with Betby and the AI can't tell me what provider Shuffle use as Shuffle never publicly announnce it.

I got notifications from this thread yesterday, and also a PM from the OP about the issue. I can see that 'Pmalek' is confident enough about the response he got from AI. Based on his research, Shuffle use the odds feed of Sportradar. But I doubt about it's accuracy. Shuffle’s odds differ significantly from sportsbooks that use Sportradar as their odds provider.

Based on your research, Shuffle doesn't use Betby as its odds provider. But in reality the odds of different sports events of Shuffle is pretty close to Betby odds feed now. They have their own customized UI for the sportsbook. There are a lot of odds provider in the market, but Shuffle.com odds doesn't exactly match with any other betting sites. Which makes it tough to find out their odds provider.

I would like to share my thoughts about this issue. The match between Pato Basquete and SC Corinthians started at 21:00 UTC on 7th March. According to the response of Shuffle, OP started to place bets from 21:58 UTC on that match. So, he was placing live bets on the match. The odds feed occasionally gets delayed being updated in some sportsbook. Maybe something like that happened in this case. Where Shuffle.com terms say this for this type of situations:

Quote from: https://shuffle.com/info/sports

🏀 Basketball
~snip~
Settlement and Cancellation Rules

• If markets remain open with an incorrect score that significantly impacts prices, we reserve the right to void betting.

@OP, have you won all your bets placed on that match?

All of the bets were originally settled as wins, and they remained that way for approximately one week. Only later, on March 13, they were changed to void.

During that entire period, the bets were marked as winning bets. My withdrawal was also placed under review, and during that time Shuffle asked me to complete additional verification steps, including Level 3 verification and a liveness check. I completed all of them successfully.

Only after that review period, my withdrawal was cancelled and the bets were changed to void.

That is why I do not believe this was simply an issue of delayed live odds or an incorrect score remaining open. If that had been the real reason, the bets should have been identified and voided immediately, not left as wins for nearly a week while my account went through full verification.

To me, it looks much more like they were looking for a reason not to pay and could not properly justify it.

Also, the same event caused no issues on other platforms using providers such as Betradar and Betby, no voids, no flags, and no integrity concerns were reported.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:27:05 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:54:42 AM

Did something happen or change with bitcoindata.science between yesterday and this morning?
I just noticed that all my images in Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos are down. Everything was fine yesterday when I posted in the topic, but now none of the images are visible. Do you know what happened?

This is related to a failed download from logpaste.com. I've restored the latest backup.
Ironically, it failed the moment you mentioned the problem:

Quote from: Pmalek on April 28, 2026, 07:08:43 AM

@LoyceV
https://logpaste.com/ seems to be down.

This made my script overwrite the old list with <nothing>.

Yeah, you are now getting data from LoyceV mirror now. So if bitcoindata is down OR if LoyceV mirror is down, your topic images will break.

It is impressive how things just break by themselves sometimes Cheesy

Quote from: holydarkness on April 28, 2026, 04:46:58 PM

I got notifications from this thread yesterday, and also a PM from the OP about the issue. There are a good number of Sportsbook which don't disclose the name of its odds provider. Shuffle is one of them. I can see that 'Pmalek' is confident enough about the response he got from AI. Based on his research, Shuffle use the odds feed of Sportradar. But I doubt about it's accuracy. Shuffle’s odds differ significantly from sportsbooks that use Sportradar as their odds provider.

Based on your research, Shuffle doesn't use Betby as its odds provider. But in reality the odds of different sports events of Shuffle is pretty close to Betby odds feed now. I have just checked it out. There are a lot of odds provider in the market, but Shuffle.com odds doesn't exactly match with any other betting sites. They have their own customized UI for the sportsbook. And I think they used different margins for different sports events, which makes it tough to find out their odds provider.

Quote from: https://shuffle.com/info/sports

🏀 Basketball
~snip~
Settlement and Cancellation Rules

• If markets remain open with an incorrect score that significantly impacts prices, we reserve the right to void betting.

@OP, have you won all your bets placed on that match?

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:27:23 AM

Bitkey keeps one of the keys encrypted in their cloud. If the company goes bankrupt or something happens to the cloud and all data gets deleted, users still have 2/3 keys. The first one in the smartphone and the second one in the Bitkey device. That's enough for them to move their coins without Bitkey's intervention.

Bitkey does not have a clear, publicly documented ‘step-by-step’ recovery procedure specifically for the event of the company’s complete disappearance (including the app and servers). There are only promises and statements regarding the restoration of access without Bitkey’s involvement, which have not yet been implemented in any way.
(If you can, please provide a link to a clear recovery procedure that does not involve Bitkey and requires the user to have only a wallet, a phone and access to Google Drive.)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:54:42 AM

This is related to a failed download from logpaste.com. I've restored the latest backup.
Ironically, it failed the moment you mentioned the problem:

Quote from: Pmalek on April 28, 2026, 07:08:43 AM

@LoyceV
https://logpaste.com/ seems to be down.

This made my script overwrite the old list with <nothing>.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:27:23 AM

The Bitkey hardware wallet is designed as an integrated, closed system and, by default, only works with its official Bitkey app; so, in the event of the company going bankrupt and the app and its internal servers being taken offline, you will no longer be able to withdraw any funds.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 28, 2026, 07:08:43 AM

https://logpaste.com/ seems to be down. It was offline yesterday as well.

That's unfortunate.

Quote from: https://www.whois.com/whois/logpaste.com

Expires On: 2026-03-16
Updated On: 2026-04-28

Maybe they forgot to extend the domain?

Quote

What do you think of PrivateBin? https://privatebin.net/

That doesn't work, it creates a huge page instead of just the text I need.

Quote

Or if you have another suggestion, I am all ears...

Good old manual PM?

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:05:09 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 04:46:58 PM

I don't know what sports provider they use. When I saw your tag, I went straight to the casino, contacted customer support, and asked one of their agents. They told me that they can't share that with me because it's not public information. I don't think such info should be kept a secret, but it is what it is.

I looked at Mahdirakib's topic, List of Crypto Sportsbooks, Their Odds Providers, and Poker Availability and he doesn't seem to know either.

ahh... [literally scratching my head]

Thank you for this. Yahoo has already gave his insight on this personally too, and unfortunatelly we [well, I, but I'll call it "we", so I don't have to sufffer the stress alone] don't know who is shuffle's provider. I've even asked GPT and DeepSeek for this, if any info were officially given by Shuffle somewhere at sometime, but they too come negative.

I guess I can only rely on Tim's transparency to get this case move forward, then.

Thank you for your help [all three of you].

Quote from: masulum on Today at 05:57:57 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:38:00 PM

Milan might unexpectedly lose even more points in the remaining games of the season because they lost Luka Modrić to injury. He broke the cheekbone after Locatelli and him clashed heads. I read today that Luka already had surgery. It's not too serious of an injury but it's likely that he will be sidelined for at least 1 or 2 weeks if not more. There is no need to explain how important Modrić is for Milan despite his age.

I think Milanista need to be happy for the 4th or 5th in standings. Everything you said is true, Milan need modric an now he was ininjury, and this is a big problem for Milan. Milan is not strong enough to keep their position till the end of season. if Milan still make a mistake, as i said before, Milan can going to 5th if Milan lose several game from the 4 remaining matches. so there is no reason for them to lose if want to take the last UCL spot

Milan to me has even performed more than the expectations of many including me because, I was not expecting Milan to find themselves were they are currently sitting in the league. A champions League place is a good one because Milan to me is a team that, is undergoing a rebuilding process and so can't compete favorably well with the rest of the top teams event if they qualify for the champions League.

For now Milan should just concentrate on finishing the rest of the remaining matches because at this stage of the competition the players has been stressed out and fatigue too has set in.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:38:00 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on March 22, 2026, 04:52:32 PM

Quote from: Yamane_Keto on March 16, 2026, 11:48:36 AM

Blockstream’s Jade adds Lightning Network Support
...
using this way allowing users to send or receive LN payments while keeping seeds secured in cold storage

The quoted part is crucial. The funds you receive don't stay on the Lightning Network. Blockstream swaps them using Boltz exchange to the Liquid network and the LBTC token. Technically, you don't have bitcoin LN. You receive Liquid's LBTC token. If you want to make an outgoing transaction, Blocsktream uses Boltz again to swap your Liquid token for LN BTC.

very interesting news in this version.

Publicly asking for help of insight from Mahdirakib, Pmalek, yahoo62278, as I think the three of you guys are quite prominent in gambling board and well connected. Uhh... do any of you happen to know what sportsbook provider Shuffle use and/or do you mind to ask around?

I got a reply from Tim, explaining and concluding one of our previous debate of the importance of the flag by Betby [me insisting it works as a considerable amount of evidence v. him telling me that Betby's flag is irrelevant to the case] because Shuffle doesn't use Betby. My quick visit to ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and raking my chat evidence with them indeed prove that they're not with Betby and the AI can't tell me what provider Shuffle use as Shuffle never publicly announnce it.

I am currently still asking Tim to show me the flag from whoever provider they're using. But if any of you is willing to pitch in... I'll greatly appreciate that.

Quote from: Lillominato89 on April 26, 2026, 06:52:17 PM

Torino 2–2 Inter (final score)
It looked like the perfect evening, but in the end Inter took home just one point and saw their lead over Napoli cut from 12 to 10. However, this result will not affect the final outcome; Inter need just one win from their remaining four matches to win the Scudetto

Inter Milan could have won the league title with the victory against Torino, but they shared the points. I was very disappointed with the result, I bet on Inter Milan to win because I believe they can win the league title with the three points. Torino performance in the last few matches was quite impressive, but I underestimated them, knowing that Milan has a good history of winning against them. That do not matter to them, other teams will not prevent them from lifting the Scudetto this season.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 27, 2026, 07:06:30 AM

Milan vs Juventus is always a match that is looked forward to with great anticipation, but it's also one that often disappoints in the end. Last night was one of those occasions. Both teams were very cautious and made defending the 0:0 result priority #1. It looked like if someone offered them the 0:0 result before kick off, both teams would accept happily. Juventus was slightly better overall, but Milan had the best scoring opportunity when Saelemaekers hit the bar.

I wasn’t expecting the match to end in a draw between Ac Milan and Juventus, it was a game where I expected one side to win. I think both teams are playing with their chances of qualifying for the next Champions League, Juventus have 3 points above Roma and Como and Ac Milan have 6 points ahead of them, while we still have four more matches to go, they need to improve their performance to be able to finish in the top four.

It looks like Inter could be the most successful team for the Serie A in the CL next season. This is simply due to the increasing gap of quality.

Teams like Napoli, Milan, Juventus (or Como/Roma) all don't have a that strong squad. I doubt they'll have after this summer either considering their spending.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 27, 2026, 03:48:40 PM

Yildiz staying on the reserves bench wasn't for tactical reasons. He is struggling with a minor injury and the coach didn't want to risk playing him when there is a chance to make it worse and perhaps make him unavailable for weeks/months. One example is Yamal. That injury is the result of overplaying a player and not giving him enough time to rest and recover between two matches.

Oh, now I see. Thanks for the information. Otherwise I was thinking there was no way Spalletti would bench his best player for no reason. Especially while fighting for top 4. Tongue

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:21:12 AM

Again, it's a "seedless" product built on a 2/3 multisig setup where you don't get to see your seed. Keys are backed up on the cloud. I don't know if this optional or mandatory.

They published pdf that clear the air around this matter. One key of 2‑of‑3 quorum is stored in the cloud, while the other two are kept separately on the user’s mobile phone and Bitkey device, respectively, and this setup is mandatory. The good thing about their architecture is that ^{unlike the standard multisig scheme} it does not compromise user privacy. They implemented Chain Code Delegation "technique created by the Bitkey engineering team and proposed as BIP‑89" for signatures involving the key stored on their server. This is fully described in section 5.1 of pdf.

SLOTS

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   - masulum
5   - G00LA
6   - bitmover
7   - Soqunami
8   - WhattheFk
9   - Ricardo11
10   - Dip69
11   - MGVVY55
12   - HausaBitCkk
13   - Itz-prisigold
14   - Antdm
15   - Protonvive
16   - Mr. Magkaisa
17   - LokhcfyBit
18   - Yoona_As
19   - Qjmak333
20   - LogitechMouse
21   - Ninja Primes
22   - Odenleva09
23   - inearth
24   - Hello5
25   - ASK Day
26   - Ventazz
27   - LNC999
28   - Danydee
29   -
30   -
31   -
32   -
33   - RTX-G53
34   -
35   - Tanelhole
36   -
37   - Jiopen
38   -
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   - HarvestOpan
43   -
44   - masulum
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   -
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   - Kadelvibess
56   - NuckaBTC
57   - Hypnotizer
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   -
67   - Improved
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   - Takiya24
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   - Pmalek
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   - Wolimmon
84   - f150
85   - FRkgWoo
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   - malcovi2

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:21:12 AM

✂️
At €230 a piece there are certainly better and cheaper hardware wallets on the market.

i totally agree with you... for that price - or even much less- you can get much better hardware wallet alternatives
this market is already so saturated that it will be very difficult to introduce new or yet unknown innovations.

Quote from: slackovic on April 27, 2026, 09:38:46 AM

Quote from: Daniel91 on April 27, 2026, 07:52:19 AM

Hvala Pmalek na ovom update-u novih kampanja u ponudi.
Odlučio sam probati svoju sreću sa DEX.fo signature kampanjom jer mi uvjeti odgovaraju.
Nema minimalnog broja postova, kampanja plaća više postova i bolje po postu nego moja trenutna, prihvaća i lokalne postove a čak nema ni obveze pisanja u gambling sekciji.
Predao sam prijavu ali vidim da su se prijave ''rastegle'' već do 6. stranice pa nisam baš optimist Grin

Nedavno se zatvorila jedno dobro plaćena kampanja i očito se povećala potražnja za novim kampanjama.

Da, ja sam isto na vagi bi li se prijavio na tu kampanju ili ne. Uvjeti su odlični, ponajviše jer nam za dva-tri mjeseca stižu godišnji odmori, a kampanja nema minimalnog broja postova. Samo opet je problem toga što nisam siguran hoće li kampanja potrajati ili se zatvoriti nakon tri-četiri tjedna.

Da, to je uvijek pitanje, što je pametnije i bolje napraviti.
Teško je unaprijed procijeniti koja će kampanja biti ''uspješna'' i trajati godinama a koja će se zatvoriti već za tjedan, dva.
U zadnje vrijeme i nema previše otvaranja novih kampanja a čim se neka nova, bolje plaćena kampanja otvori, odmah bude 5-6 stranica prijava.
Ja sam ipak odlučio probati sreću pa ću vidjeti, najviše zbog onog uvjeta da nema minimalnog broja postova, jer uskoro dolazi ljeto i godišnji kada već znam da ću biti manje aktivan na forumu.
Vidjet ćemo.

Quote from: Daniel91 on April 23, 2026, 07:47:40 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on April 23, 2026, 06:50:13 AM

Quote from: Trofo on April 22, 2026, 07:46:54 AM

Pmalek? Jel došlo vrijeme da te vidimo u nekom promu? Za wc dodat ćemo 2 nova promoa, oba sponzorina od strane Rainbeta. Svaki 100mBTC.

Uopšte ne pratim nogometne lige, čak ni lige petice više. Pogledam utakmice svog kluba, Juventusa i završnicu Lige Prvaka ako su zanimljivi dueli i to je to. Ali Svjetsko Prvenstvo nije svaki dan i ako bude zanimljiv promo možda se i priključim. Budem vidio kako će to sve izgledati a i gdje ću ja bit u to vrijeme pa da se znam organizovati. Hvala na pozivu!

Super, što nas je više to bolje, a ako se još netko zainteresira možda uspijemo sastaviti i 3 lokalna tima sa našeg područja Grin

Sad kad je slackovic spomenuo malo sam pogledao tu sekciju i vidim da ima i drugih dostupnih sportskih natjecanja ali meni je za sada sasvim dovoljno i BSFL natjecanje i još to ekipno natjecanje koje kreće za svjetsko prvenstvo i više od toga bi mi stvarno bilo previše, moglo bi se pretvoriti u full tim job i opterećenje a to ne želim.
Super da osim signature kampanja ima toliko dodatnih mogućnosti drugih kampanja tj. natjecanja gdje se čovjek može malo i zabaviti, skupiti jednostavno dovoljan broj postova u gambling sekciji i još dodatno zaraditi. Win Win.
Ehh kad bi mi bar moj trenutni manager priznavao postove u BSFL threadu Cheesy

Aktivirajte se ljudi već smo u punom zamahu. Očekujem bar još jednu cro ekipu i jednu možda balkan

Jedan igrač s iskostvom BSFLa unutar tima i jedan koji je ikada odigrao ticket su vam po meni već dovoljni za dobre šanse i minimalni effort oko pravila i svega.
⚽⭐⚽ Rainbet’s BTT World Cup 2026 – Road to Glory ⚽⭐⚽

Kao što su ti neki već rekli, čudno mi je da ti ne broji postove u BSFL threadu i ja bi to raspravio direkt s managerom. Ideja iza pravila je da ti veliki threadovi nemaju smisla jer je pitanje postavljeno u prvom postu već odgovoreno sigurno na prvih 10 stranica. Bar je to meni tako bilo tako prezentirano, to za BSFL ne vrijedi jer nije takav tip threada i svaki tjedan je zapravo nova diskusija.

S druge strane meni je bilo kakvo ograničavanje postova kontraproduktivno. Biraj ljude u kampanju koji pišu tamo di ti treba, ali to vrijedi samo za top accounte dok multiacounteri vjerojatno mjenjaju sklonosti kako vjetar puše. Mi u našim kampanjama uglavnom odbijamo samo games & rounds, jer baš plaćati nekome da piše 21 gol ili 68.645$ je stvarno debilno

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:41:43 PM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:29:07 PM

Vec smo diskutovali o ovakvom nastupu menadzera, gde otvori kampanju za veliki broj ucesnika, da bi to vec nakon par ciklusa redukovao taj broj i nakon mesec dana je sveo na nekoliko ucesnika. Nisam siguran koja je osnovna ideja za to, kad je prilicno jasno da signature kampanja radi posao samo na duzi period. Umesto da imas kampanju za 50 ucesnika jedan mesec, bolje je 15 kvalitetnih, ali 3 meseca.

Sigurno menadžeri tu nemaju zadnju riječ. Oni mogu savjetovati vlasnike usluga koje reklamiraju šta je najbolje i predložiti saradnju na duže staze jer to ima bolje rezultate od kratkotrajnih kampanja. I menadžerima se to više isplati jer pretpostavljam da i njih plaćaju na tjednoj bazi. Ali na kraju krajeva odlučuju oni koju daju novac za promociju. Očekivati instant rezultate, pogotovo nakon tjedan ili dva, je pogrešno a ima i takvih. Viđali smo kampanje koje se završe nakon 7 dana vjerovatno jer neko nije vidio rezultate koje odmah očekuje i ne želi dalje da plaća za reklamu.

Zapravo downsizing na pola recimo nakon 2 mjeseca možda čak i drži vodu. U dva mjeseca jako dobro upoznaš ljude i kako pišu, te ako izbaciš pola ostane ti creame de la creame Grin

To naravno vrijedi kada uzimaš ljude koje ne znaš od prije. Ako ne radiš to možda se isplati svaka dva mjeseca izbaciti bottom 25% i uzeti nove ljude te tako kontinuirano dizati kvalitetu kampanje.

Quote from: inspace on April 23, 2026, 07:22:28 PM

Quote from: ➥ Instant / Automatic & No Registration [Official Website] & [Fast Tutorial] & [ANN Thread] & [Altcointalk] 🔊

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/05/22/UaYjBv.gif

CCE.Cash is a Fast Automatic Exchange accepting .Bitcoin, ETH, SOL, XMR, TRX, USDT., etc. Users can quickly and anonymously complete currency exchange without registering. Its core features are: automation, simplicity, and security. A simple 2-step guide will help you quickly get familiar with the functionality.

Rules/Prizes:

➥ Pick a SLOT! 🎯
➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ You can choose 2 SLOTS if you posted comments in the ANN topic before the raffle announcement draw in the last 2 weeks.
➥ After selecting a block, we will use the BitList tool to determine the winner.

01 - knuckey
02 - Tmoonz
03 - mikel_012
04 - Barcode_
05 - Cityhunter34
06 - CoinMin3r
07 - FP91G
08 - NeuroticFish
09 - Real-Duke
10 - Danydee
11 - TryNinja
12 - Z-tight
13 - Z-tight
14 - ovcijisir
15 -
16 - Mr. Magkaisa
17 - tvplus006
18 - Woodie
19 -
20 - safar1980
21 - Pandorak
22 - haloxon
23 - GazetaBitcoin
24 - malcovi2
25 - Unsoldier
26 - Rikafip
27 - Soonandwaite
28 -
29 -
30 - hugeblack
31 - odunybiz
32 - DYING_S0UL
33 - Italian Panic
34 - klarki
35 - examplens
36 - bitmover
37 - bitmover
38 -
39 -
40 - masulum
41 - Pmalek
42 -
43 - FinneysTrueVision
44 - examplens
45 - dansus021
46 -
47 - viljy
48 - Taricoins
49 -
50 - sabotag3x
51 -
52 - mikel_012
53 - UserU
54 - mv1986
55 - inspace
56 -
57 - Hypnotizer
58 - zasad@
59 - Bigjoe33
60 - xandry

Application:

Code:

Slot #: 60
BTC Address: bc1qw9et92hp8k4vewk3w7ak0mqctqnke5c29u2pg6

Quote from: CCE.Cash

We reserve the right to ignore any application without explanation. No random slots.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

- They say that battery failures happen from time to time. OK. No arguments there.

In addition to LoyceV's comment, it's worth mentioning that most of them can still be used while being plugged in.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

- The native apps of these devices introduce various types of attack vectors. They introduce some and then they get fixed. The same can be said about software wallets. It's always a fight between good and evil.

+ Considering that most of them are compatible with other wallets, they can always opt for one of the so-called safer ones.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

- Hardware wallets aren't private and the vendors know your name and can see your balances. True, but it also depends how you buy them and where. Some companies sell their devices in physical stores, like Best Buy and MediaMarkt. Parts for DIY HWs can be purchased from various unrelated sellers online.

+ Some of them also give their users the option to use their own nodes.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:29:36 AM

In the end, Unstoppable and other software wallets aren't better and safer than good hardware wallets.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 02:24:04 PM

But the fact that they seem to think they must talk down hardware wallets to get people to use their app makes me trust them less.

Exactly and that's why I finally pulled the plug on them... I thought their app was unstoppable, but it turns out it wasn't that hard to stop them ^{[I just did]}: Select their app, then hit uninstall Cool