Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:48:48 PM

An old post is now resurfacing where someone reported that their bitcoin was stolen from a Coldcard Mk4 back in 2022. Other people apparently confirmed that the same thing happened to them but they were blocked and silenced. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Someone could have discovered this vulnerability years ago before the draining of wallets began a few days ago. Same individual/group or a different one... who knows.

https://x.com/Zenul_Abidin/status/2083756420843839872

That's me, thanks for sharing

So apparently what I have also learned is that this entire software RNG path was triggered by a singular macro directive which was not written properly.

In other words, a line of code.

It was responsible for enabling the hardware RNG and got shut off by a developer who noted that the code wouldn't compile until that change was made.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:20:26 PM

~snip~

To be frank, Earnbet doesn't really run any promotions for its users. They occasionally run giveaways on their X account and post challenges on their Telegram channel. Those aren't really a big part of casino promotions. The $200k wager contest is the only active and real promotion of Earnbet. But it is a yearly wager contest where the top 3 ranked users will share the $200k prize pool.

So, it is reasonable not to receive promotional emails from EarnBet as they don't run any promotions.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:32:18 PM

To je veliki problem. Nisu svi aktivni na društvenim mrežama, ovom forumu niti redovno prate dešavanja vezana za Bitcoin. Kad imaš cold wallet koji je i airgapped i ne čačkaš ga previše. Možda s vremena na vrijeme provjeriš povezani watch-only wallet.

Pa da. I kupis hardverski novcanik upravo iz tog razloga, da se ne moras tresti, stalno provjeravati adrese i brinuti da ce te netko hackirati i ukrasti ti crypto, i onda popusis lovu na ovakav nacin. Jebena katastrofa.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:32:18 PM

Sad se spekuliše da su se prve krađe sredstava desile čak 2022 i da je već tad bilo korisnika koji su se na Redditu žalili da im je nestao bitcoin. Međutim ti ljudi su blokirani i postovi su im brisani.
https://x.com/Zenul_Abidin/status/2083756420843839872

Da vidio sam to, ali po meni je ipak vjerojatnije da je liku netko popalio seed i na taj nacin ukrao kripto nego da je isti propust u pitanju, jer da je, napad bi bio puno masovniji. Kao sto je uostalom ovaj gdje je trenutno ukradeno preko 1300 bitcoina.

Quote from: Pmalek on August 01, 2026, 06:52:59 AM

Kakva li će biti budućnost Coldcard projekta i da li je ovo kraj? Bit će zanimljivo ispratiti.

Pa mislim da moras biti lud ako imas neki od Coldcarda novcanika a nisi vec prebacio lovu na neki drugi wallet, pa makar ti seed i nije generiran na Coldcardu. Mislim da bi i Ledger/Trezor tesko ovo prezivili, a kamoli tako neka manja fiorma.

Najgore je sto sigurno ima ekipe koja uopce ne prati vijesti te ce se jako neugodno iznenaditi kad za par tjedana/mjeseci provjere svoje Coldcard wallete i skuze da nemaju vise nista.

Quote from: Pmalek on August 01, 2026, 07:22:01 AM

The days of me recommending bitcoin to friends are gone. I have tried different tactics to get them interested but they just don't want to. Some don't get it, others aren't interested. I have even gifted BTC to some of my best friends. They don't care. I think I would have had more success with bananas.

I still get the occasional "how is that Bitcoin thing going?" type of questions. When the price increased above $100k and they heard about it, some commented that they regret not buying. When it started dropping, it was a different story. Now they are certain that BTC is doomed to fail and there is no future for it anymore. I just shrug it off with a smile.

Satoshi was right when he said, "if you don't believe or don't get it, then I don't have the time to try to convince you." Do your own thing and be happy.

Bitcoin is not really something that we can force to learn by people. There are people maybe got curious about it, then others provably just ignore and this is so fine. Because for use if price goes up or down. Their focus will mainly goes on short term matters, not on the potential of Bitcoin.

Same as you I stop or rarely convince people to learn Bitcoin. Because those people got interest about it will explore and try to learn more information's on their own.

I like that statement made by Satoshi long ago, because with that there's no forcing and those who came in are the one which truly have interest to try use or invest on Bitcoin.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:12:14 AM

Najlakše bi bilo da ti dozvoli da se registruješ na kasino sa VPN-om ali pošto si iz Hrvatske ne smiješ tamo igrati, deponovati novac ili koristiti platformu na bilo koji način. Po mom mišljenju to ne bi trebao biti problem jer se zarada od signature kampanje na šalje na adresu od 1win kasina nego na wallet koji tebi odgovara. Jedna registracije više ili manje im ne bi trebala ništa značiti.

Upravo tako smo se i dogovorili. Znao sam da mogu to napraviti, ali htio sam prvo provjeriti s menadžerom da ne ispadne da nesto muljem. Sad samo čekam da objavi koga je prihvatio i da kampanja krene.

Ne znam samo što Trofo i cryptofrka čekaju s novim natjecanjima. Prije godišnjeg mi je Trofo napisao da se ne opuštam previše na godišnjem jer će krenuti nova natjecanja, ali zasad još ništa. Očito su i njih dvojica još na godišnjem odmoru.

Quote from: Pmalek on July 31, 2026, 04:06:44 PM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on July 31, 2026, 04:46:43 AM

But did you know I can't see their Twitter/X account from my region, marked as ''Account Withheld'' even though I can see accounts from other casinos. I'm not sure if EarnBet is aware of this and if it's just our region or most of the Asian region. Besides that, I also rarely get updates via email and to be honest, sometimes I forget that I have an account here because there is no news in my email. What about you, am I the only one experiencing this?

How about if you try to access their X account with a VPN from a different location? Does it work then? If it does, it could be a restriction from X as a result of a government request for example. Your country isn't on EarnBet's restricted territories list, is it?

You are right that it is a local ban/restriction as requested by the government of our country. X in general is obligated to follow the local laws means that once the government ask/request them to restrict the access of any accounts/contents on X which suspected of promoting online gambling, X should do it immediatelly. Even ordinary people in my country can also help the government to report any gambling related accounts. Using VPN will solve it obviously because it is only a local restriction. His (our) country is not on the restriction list by Earnbet's terms of service.
Regarding his concern about no email from Earnbet, I am experiencing it as well because Earnbet rarely send promotional email or updates like most other casinos. The only emails I received from Earnbet are all related to withdrawal confirmation. Not sure if it is also experienced by all earnbet players or it is experienced by Indonesian users only?

Quote from: KiaKia on August 01, 2026, 12:17:17 PM

The only lesson I learnt here is that nowhere is safe, putting all your eggs in one basket is totally wrong, as for that passphrase thing, hardware wallets are the only ones offering it?

If any mobile wallet has passphrase+ recovery seeds then there is really no reason to run after hardware wallets anymore, I am really disappointed in this ColdCard company and their team together.

Many people might never return to Bitcoin investment after this, there are people who have been holding and stacking Bitcoin since 2019 on that list of victims, someone whom I never thought would use ColdCard because I've never heard the name from him before.

Of course no where is totally safe and keeping all your Bitcoins in a single wallet can be costly but this incident doesn't entirely make hardware wallets less reliable, they are still the safest wallet around. I think the lesson should be knowing even hardware wallets can be vulnerable so it's better to use a device from a more reputable company.

Hardware wallets are not the only ones offering a passphrase, even mobile wallets offer it too although not many of them do but being connected to the internet makes them less safe than hardware wallets. Many wouldn't trust the company again and sadly people who had held on to Bitcoin for years will be discouraged to return to Bitcoin. It's really a terrible experience.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:45 AM

Quote from: tbct_mt2 on Today at 04:31:38 AM

Security vulnerability was found and reported two years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj_W3xOlt6U

That wasn't Coldcard's fault. That happened because the person used only one die roll in the creation of his seed and wallet. If the recommended number of dice rolls for enough entropy is 100, the wallet that user created was significantly less secure and was therefore easy to brute force. The same thing would/could have happened regardless what you used for the creation of such a seed. What Coldcard could have done better in that case is to show a warning, informing the user that they are supposed to enter many more dice rolls to increase the security of their keys.

A good company will have their customers best interest at heart. If they had issue out warnings that one dice roll or any number less than the recommended number would create a less secure seed people would have been aware and avoid making the mistake because no one wants to lose their assets. They are the manufacturer, they set the standard so they should have made the wallet display a warning sign at least to informed their customers earlier so they should be taking the blame here, they were being careless.

Quote from: BALIK on Today at 03:56:52 AM

As I understand it, coldcard is open source, and their firmware is published publicly and can be self built and self verified. That is why when the entropy bug happened, the community was able to trace the root cause so fast. If it had been closed source like Ledger, we would probably still have no idea what caused it unless they decided to disclose it themselves.

Coldcard is open source but the hardware itself is not fully open source. However, this incident was caused by a firmware bug, not the hardware.

https://github.com/Coldcard/firmware
https://github.com/Coldcard/firmware/blob/master/hardware/README.md

They are not open source wallet and their hardware wallet source code, including firmwares are only available and verifiable. It's different than reproducible that is only for open source hardware wallets.

https://walletscrutiny.com/?platform=allPlatforms&page=0&query-string=coldcard

Quote from: Pmalek on July 31, 2026, 03:48:16 PM

The code has been available for public scrutiny for 5 years and no one ever found it. Coldcard isn't open-source but its code is publicly verifiable. No security expert found the vulnerability.

Quote from: Pmalek on July 31, 2026, 07:14:07 AM

Quote from: SilverCryptoBullet on July 31, 2026, 06:39:00 AM

Coldcard wallet is open source
https://walletscrutiny.com/?platform=allPlatforms&page=0&query-string=coldcard

Coldcard is not open-source. The code is publicly available for verification, but it's not open-source. I guess the right term is "source-verifiable code."
With an open-source license, you are allowed to use the code, build upon it, and release your own products. Coldcard doesn't allow you to do that. In the beginning, it was open-source, but NVK changed it to prevent other companies from copying the Coldcard code to create similar (competitor) products. That was a bad decision.

Security vulnerability was found and reported two years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj_W3xOlt6U

DT Member - Agustus 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 107 user

Daftar lama (Juli 2026):

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
efialtis
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
SirJohnVonSlotty

-----

Daftar Baru (Agustus 2026):

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
vapourminer
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
Lucius
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
ZAINmalik75
YodasRedRocket
SirJohnVonSlotty

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia:

Code:

AakZaki
roycilik
Husna QA
abhiseshakana
YOSHIE

Sumber: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg67002249#msg67002249

Jika masih ada DT1 member dari Indonesia yang belum tercantum pada kolom ke-3, silahkan dikoreksi.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:51:44 PM

I just saw an X post that claims that seedphrases generated on Coldcard Mk4s are beginning to be drained now as well. They were considered vulnerable already but the entropy was allegedly not as weak as the one on Mk3 with the affected firmware versions. Here is one such post.

Someone has also reported that they found a critical vulnerability in Bitkey. Perhaps there is a connection or AI found something.

I read the thread but it still wasn't confirmed if the mk4s are really being attacked currently, as the keys are created on mk3 and just migrated on mk4. There is still investigation happening.

People are really active on this issue as this is a large compromise and would most likely affects the integrity of hard wallet companies. This compromise would certainly affect the reputation of coinkite and other hardware companies given that people would think that having a hardware wallet isn't as safe as we thought.

This issue also make other hackers realize that hardware wallet isn't impossible to penetrate.

This month 107 users were eligible.

Old:

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
efialtis
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
SirJohnVonSlotty

New:

Code:

theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
vapourminer
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
Lucius
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
ZAINmalik75
YodasRedRocket
SirJohnVonSlotty

Quote from: goldphysicalbitcoin on Today at 03:16:13 PM

The actions of the malicious attacker are truly regrettable. For those new to Bitcoin investment, purchasing an ETF or using a custodial service like Coinbase is likely the most suitable option at present; before the advent of mainstream hardware wallets, self-custody relied primarily on paper wallets—a method that remains secure to this day—whereas hardware wallets introduce additional risks that cannot be overlooked.

Please do not push users towards unsafe solutions. Paper wallets, even if generated offline, were hot wallets (generated on your computer, sent to a printer), and had only one address, which is extremely bad for privacy.
The cryptography behind paper wallets is just as safe as any other wallet, but everything else really isn't.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:51:44 PM

I just saw an X post that claims that seedphrases generated on Coldcard Mk4s are beginning to be drained now as well. They were considered vulnerable already but the entropy was allegedly not as weak as the one on Mk3 with the affected firmware versions. Here is one such post.

For the record, he posted an update recently telling that the seed was i fact generated on a Mk3 and then migrated to an Mk4.
Which does't mean that Mk4, Mk5 and Q are safe. They aren't.

Also, if anyone wants a technical post-mortem, I've come across this one that has just been published by Kevin Loaec from Wizardsardine (Liana): https://wizardsardine.com/blog/coldcard-rng-vulnerability/

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:51:44 PM

I just saw an X post that claims that seedphrases generated on Coldcard Mk4s are beginning to be drained now as well. They were considered vulnerable already but the entropy was allegedly not as weak as the one on Mk3 with the affected firmware versions. Here is one such post.

Someone has also reported that they found a critical vulnerability in Bitkey. Perhaps there is a connection or AI found something.

OK, Coldcard as a brand is finished.

There's no coming back from this for them

And that Bitkey vulnerability better be found before it gets exploited too.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (62) 14878 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 10038 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11265 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4740 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3608 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9913 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6779 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8885 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +44 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6265 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2560 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2170 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (13) 6698 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1947 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13761 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3765 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10456 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4442 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3960 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 12027 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2854 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4640 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (66) 21346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3131 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2083 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3873 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6825 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1976 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4633 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3601 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 13112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1479 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2366 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 10081 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2642 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7633 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11373 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3469 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3460 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 21101 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2980 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2598 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5759 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1606 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +49 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3780 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1900 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1597 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4145 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1568 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8177 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1885 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9901 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1603 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9945 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3588 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1020 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8825 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:46:01 AM

Quote from: mikel_012 on July 31, 2026, 08:17:47 PM

It is like a withdrawal fee

Many casinos in the list will also charge in a way you try to send 0.1 BTC and you will receive 0.09981 but this is not a problem, it is the cost to send the transaction from one wallet or blockchain to the other

The bitcoin network already exists if you want to receive btc in the main chain from rBTC

Regardless. It's 2026, and there is no reason why a casino wouldn't support real bitcoin on the Bitcoin blockchain without requiring that users find other ways to convert their tokens into BTC later. They will gladly take my bitcoin and give me options to gamble with it, but I can't withdraw bitcoin from them. I don't like the system they have set up and I agree with notblox1. I don't want their Rootstock token or a Wrapped Bitcoin if I can have the real thing elsewhere.

Imagine the inconvenience they bring to their players for forcing them to convert it to Wrapped Bitcoin and Rootstock token, also I really find it unnecessary action to do.

So if they want to make everything easy on the side of their user. Much better allow them to withdraw and deposit the native Bitcoin itself.

Many people want real BTC and not those substitute coins. Also if other casinos can able to handle direct BTC withdrawal for sure there's no reason on why they cannot implement that on their platform.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:06:44 PM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on Today at 04:46:43 AM

But did you know I can't see their Twitter/X account from my region, marked as ''Account Withheld'' even though I can see accounts from other casinos. I'm not sure if EarnBet is aware of this and if it's just our region or most of the Asian region. Besides that, I also rarely get updates via email and to be honest, sometimes I forget that I have an account here because there is no news in my email. What about you, am I the only one experiencing this?

How about if you try to access their X account with a VPN from a different location? Does it work then? If it does, it could be a restriction from X as a result of a government request for example. Your country isn't on EarnBet's restricted territories list, is it?

This is really very new to me, and I had no idea that it could happen. I am able to see what the account posts from my side. It probably has something to do with your local regulations regarding gambling and online casinos. X is probably trying to implement a directive.

I did some searching using AI, and this is what I saw

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:06:44 PM

EarnBet posted about another huge win on the NoLimit slot Mental. The final multiplier was 66,666x. A €0.20 spin triggered free spins (or were they bought?) and the player won over €13,300.
https://x.com/EarnBetCasino/status/2082917937560555743

This win was basically happened on July 20th as we can find under the history in that game:

It is hard to guess whether it came from regular spin or bonus buy, fun fact that can be watched from the replay is that those 2 max win as shown on above screenshot were in similar situation.
The one happened on 20th as posted on X by earnbet, the remaining balance of the user is €22.62 while the one happened in 18th, the remaining balance is €27.77
I'm wondering were these 2 wins done by a single player or 2 different lucky players who hit the max win when their remaining balance is less than €30.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:08 AM

Jako loša situacija koje je mogla biti spriječena da nije bilo pohlepe kod njihovog glavnog developera, NVK. 2021 je Coldcard promijenio licensu i nisu više bili open-source.

Pratio sam tu dramu oko open sourcea, sjecam se da je dkbit98 onomad vodio bitku sa onim nvK likom i upozoravao na njegovo sumLJivo ponasanje.

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 09:07:39 AM

Moja logika je držati se najvećih, ako rokne netko kao electrum ili bitcoincore....onda imamo puno veće probleme od samo moje love koja fali.

Da, upravo iz tog razloga mi nikad nije bila privlacna ideja kupovati te manje poznate hardverske novcanike.

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 11:11:29 AM

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 09:07:39 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:08 AM

S pravom se čovjek pita šta će se otkriti sutra, za godinu ili za deset i ko je slijedeći na redu? Postoje mnogo bolja open-source rješenja nego što je Coldcard ali je i ova ranjivost pet godina bila javno dostupna i niko nije znao u čemu je problem dok nije bilo prekasno. Toliko o stručnosti.

Moja logika je držati se najvećih, ako rokne netko kao electrum ili bitcoincore....onda imamo puno veće probleme od samo moje love koja fali.

Ali kada se nešto ovako dogodi meni je odmah sumnjivo. Znači exploit je bio točno na period nakon što je prestao biti open source. Meni to odmah vuče na namjerni backdoor i poslije pokrivanje ušima kao probili su nas. Sorry

Da, djeluje kao ''inside job'' i jako je sumnjivo.

Znajuci dramu koja je bila nakon izlaska Claude Fable 5 i onog Mythos modela, razvaljivanje ovog Coldcard propusta deluje kao trening. Ne tvrdim da jeste to bilo, ali sam siguran da je danas ovakve stvari mnogo lakse raditi nego pre samo godinu dana.
Na jednom forumu vidjam veoma aktivne diskusije od prepoznavanja exploit pa sve do toga kako eksploatisati neki propust.
Koliko vidim, Coldcard deluje da i nije imao slozen backend, moguce da zaista nije bio potreban backdoor za ovo danas.

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 09:07:39 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:08 AM

S pravom se čovjek pita šta će se otkriti sutra, za godinu ili za deset i ko je slijedeći na redu? Postoje mnogo bolja open-source rješenja nego što je Coldcard ali je i ova ranjivost pet godina bila javno dostupna i niko nije znao u čemu je problem dok nije bilo prekasno. Toliko o stručnosti.

Moja logika je držati se najvećih, ako rokne netko kao electrum ili bitcoincore....onda imamo puno veće probleme od samo moje love koja fali.

Ali kada se nešto ovako dogodi meni je odmah sumnjivo. Znači exploit je bio točno na period nakon što je prestao biti open source. Meni to odmah vuče na namjerni backdoor i poslije pokrivanje ušima kao probili su nas. Sorry

Da, djeluje kao ''inside job'' i jako je sumnjivo.
Ja se također držim electrum-a, već godinama za likvidna sredstva koja mi trebaju na dnevnoj bazi ali tamo držim samo onoliko koliko mi treba.
Sada malo djeluju smiješno sve te recenzije o sigurnosti ColdCard-a, poput one sa stranice mojkripto.com gdje pišu o tome da će seed phase biti pohranjen na posebno sigurnom ATECC608 čipu, o dostupnom i proveljivom računalnom kodu, provjerenom lancu dobave, lažni PIN i PIN iz dva dijela...
Apsolutne sigurnosti u cryptu očito nema ali opet neki hardware novčanik ipak moraš odabrati i očito nadati se da nećeš ovako završiti.
Slažem se, treba se držati najvećih.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 09:47:46 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on April 27, 2021, 06:03:10 PM

l0tt0	\|	$10, ≈	\|	*Dynamic withdrawal fees.	\|	-	\|

L0tt0 fees are dynamic only, there is no fixed $10 fee. Basically only mining fees (with some little overpay to get to the next block)

You misunderstood it, the $10 as shown in the table is not referring to the fee but it is referring to the minimum withdrawal amount.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 27, 2021, 06:03:10 PM

l0tt0	\|	$10, ≈	\|	*Dynamic withdrawal fees.	\|	-	\|

L0tt0 fees are dynamic only, there is no fixed $10 fee. Basically only mining fees (with some little overpay to get to the next block)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:08 AM

S pravom se čovjek pita šta će se otkriti sutra, za godinu ili za deset i ko je slijedeći na redu? Postoje mnogo bolja open-source rješenja nego što je Coldcard ali je i ova ranjivost pet godina bila javno dostupna i niko nije znao u čemu je problem dok nije bilo prekasno. Toliko o stručnosti.

Moja logika je držati se najvećih, ako rokne netko kao electrum ili bitcoincore....onda imamo puno veće probleme od samo moje love koja fali.

Ali kada se nešto ovako dogodi meni je odmah sumnjivo. Znači exploit je bio točno na period nakon što je prestao biti open source. Meni to odmah vuče na namjerni backdoor i poslije pokrivanje ušima kao probili su nas. Sorry

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:14:07 AM

Quote from: SilverCryptoBullet on Today at 06:39:00 AM

Coldcard wallet is open source
https://walletscrutiny.com/?platform=allPlatforms&page=0&query-string=coldcard

Coldcard is not open-source. The code is publicly available for verification, but it's not open-source. I guess the right term is "source-verifiable code."
With an open-source license, you are allowed to use the code, build upon it, and release your own products. Coldcard doesn't allow you to do that. In the beginning, it was open-source, but NVK changed it to prevent other companies from copying the Coldcard code to create similar (competitor) products. That was a bad decision.

That is exactly right. And here's the problem with "source verifiable" code vs open source code.

When ColdCard switched their code from being open source to “source verifiable” they blocked other developers from being able to legally use their code. This decreased the number of developers regularly reading their code.

Fewer devs reading the code meant fewer experts finding errors in the code, which meant fewer errors being found and fixed.

Hackers found an exploit in ColdCard's code and they exploited it to vicious effect. Over 500 wallets were drained.

Eff ColdCard and their “source verifiable” code. It isn't open source, and it's costing people their coins.

This isn't the last of these attacks, but these attacks are preventable.

Never trust your Bitcoin to code that is not fully open source. No exceptions. And if we're being completely honest, it's probably time to stop using wallets created using code-generated seed phrases unless you're also using human-generated input such as a passphrase or multisig.

Quote from: Mahdirakib on Today at 05:58:19 AM

@Pmalek, maybe you also want to remove Primedice from the list since they have stopped operating. They are still in the KYC and bonus related thread which I made. I will remove them soon as I have planned to update those threads next month.

Yeah. Already informed him about this earlier and it looks like he will wait until they fully cease operations after a couple of months in October.

Quote from: Pmalek on May 24, 2026, 03:32:33 PM

Quote from: Haunebu on May 24, 2026, 07:28:56 AM

Anyway, I want to talk about Primedice. They recently announced that they are shutting down later this year on Oct 8 which is clearly visible on their site itself.

Yes, I saw that as well. I have no reason to remove them from the thread until that happens because it's still operational right now.

It's one of the OG crypto gambling sites sailing off into the sunset though I won't be missing it much thanks to Stake turning out to be an excellent replacement for it.

Quote from: panjul07 on July 30, 2026, 02:44:43 PM

1.Bitsler minimum withdrawal is now 0.0002btc

Bitsler is one of those casinos who change their withdrawal limit now and then. I had provided updates about the withdrawal limit of different platforms a lot of times in this thread. Bitsler is the only casino which came in that list most of the time. If 'Pmalek' wants to keep the Bitsler minimum withdrawal information up to date, then he needs to check it out at least one time every month.

@Pmalek, maybe you also want to remove Primedice from the list since they have stopped operating. They are still in the KYC and bonus related thread which I made. I will remove them soon as I have planned to update those threads next month.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:56 AM

Quote from: promise444c5 on July 29, 2026, 08:13:15 PM

Not the first,wont be last either..
I remember Pmalek created a thread about similar Fake sparrow wallet that stole BTC from a long term holder :https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5552731.0 . I think he also lauched a campaign that took down a fake sparrow wallet.. it's back again Tongue

I don't understand why someone with so much money just decide to download a wallet with zero research on a mobile wallet.. A quick search will even tell them Sparrow has no mobile wallet.

Some people just have bad habits. Even those who are supposed to know better teach people to find and install software in the wrong way.

I heard about an interesting open-source app the other day. It has nothing to do with bitcoin, crypto, or anything like that, so there is no point in mentioning the name here. Because I never used the app, I went to YouTube to watch a few videos to see how it works, what features it has, etc. I found two good explanatory videos. What both videos have in common is the way the creators explain how to install the app. They don't tell the viewers to visit the official homepage or the GitHub repository. Instead, they instruct them to go to app stores and search for the software there. The app in question isn't a financial app of any kind and it's not an interesting target for scammers, but they are still teaching people in a bad way.

This is how the problem starts, since the scammer can use the video they created and put the link of their fake apps. Which is so bad for unaware individuals, since this can possibly cause financial loss to them.

It would be nice if those content creators became responsible for creating more valuable and informative contents. Then have complete tutorial on which they redirect people to download what they need on legitimate sources. Since with that for sure they can save many people that can watch their video from fake apps came from unknown store or unverified sources

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:04:56 AM

They don't tell the viewers to visit the official homepage or the GitHub repository. Instead, they instruct them to go to app stores and search for the software there. The app in question isn't a financial app of any kind and it's not an interesting target for scammers, but they are still teaching people in a bad way.

That’s literally what has been incorporated into most people over the years and it’s become so normal even though it’s a very bad and wrong practice.

Funny part is that most people having a wallet can’t even tell if such wallet have an official site or not.. They just wake up download a wallet as suggested by someone from App Store or Playstore , blindly trust it and dump Millions into it ..

After eventually losing some money, they do what’s meant to have been done before downloading such wallet Tongue

The sooner people start realising they are responsible for their loss, the more they stop trusting these companies blindly.

Quote from: Pmalek on July 29, 2026, 06:57:18 PM

Quote from: panjul07 on July 28, 2026, 01:00:07 PM

Third, Punkz:
Based on above image, there is no minimum withdrawal for btc in Punkz now and there is also no withdrawal fee (free) now.

I checked this again with their live support and they confirmed that the minimum withdrawal amount is still €10.

Means that the information on the withdrawal page is misleading for player as it is written as "Withdrawal Amount (Min $0.00)"
I tried myself earlier today to request a withdrawal less than €10, the system is not rejecting it straight away which make the withdrawal request on pending status.
Few minutes later, my withdrawal request is rejected/declined without any reason but it must be related to the minimum withdrawal rule.

Anyway, found some other sites that need to be updated as what is written here is different with the one in the website:
1.Bitsler minimum withdrawal is now 0.0002btc

2. Wolfbet minimum withdrawal 0.0008btc

One casino that you may add on your list is 2UP.io, their ANN thread started on October last year.
The minimum btc withdrawal is 0.0003btc but unfortunately I cant really remember about the fee as I'm VIP user there who gets free network fee.

Note: I know you are aware there is an open scam accusation thread against this casino, so take your time to take a look more before adding it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:49:52 AM

It's sad, but the best lessons are learned when they happen to you personally. Never trust anyone who claims they want to make you money and they are there to help you. Bullshit. They want to help themselves and make money off of you. People who consider unsolicited investment opportunities as scams and the people who contact them as scammers will be better off than individuals willing to hear them out and give it a try. It's a nasty world out there, so be careful. Don't be the small fish that gets eaten.

I know a lot of good lessons I’ve learned from the experience of others, without necessarily allowing it to happen to me first. Yes experience sure does teach the best lessons, but it’s mostly the painful ones, some who are unlucky never actually gets to recover and heal from the trauma of life’s lessons. So I think it’s best to learn and do your best so the shitty stuffs doesn’t happen to you. Everyday, people release different stories online about how they’re scammed and swindled by scammers, and these stories are more than enough to use as lessons to learn from.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:49:52 AM

It's sad, but the best lessons are learned when they happen to you personally. Never trust anyone who claims they want to make you money and they are there to help you. Bullshit. They want to help themselves and make money off of you. People who consider unsolicited investment opportunities as scams and the people who contact them as scammers will be better off than individuals willing to hear them out and give it a try. It's a nasty world out there, so be careful. Don't be the small fish that gets eaten.

I know a lot of good lessons I’ve learned from the experience of others, without necessarily allowing it to happen to me first. Yes experience sure does teach the best lessons, but it’s mostly the painful ones, some who are unlucky never actually gets to recover and heal from the trauma of life’s lessons. So I think it’s best to learn and do your best so the shitty stuffs doesn’t happen to you. Everyday, people release different stories online about how they’re scammed and swindled by scammers, and these stories are more than enough to use as lessons to learn from.

Weekly update (2026-07-24_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1784860831 1 5589239.msg66973096 982288 894012
1784860662 1 5589202.msg66971928 982288 3746445
1784860655 1 5589202.msg66972322 982288 1197905
1784859705 1 5572859.msg66970787 408030 839568
1784858184 4 5589242.msg66973363 885934 1137579
1784857639 1 5589242.msg66973365 885934 2434463
1784857625 1 5589242.msg66973363 885934 1137579
1784856662 1 5583440.msg66972663 846936 1021018
1784856293 1 5589185.msg66973079 846936 1021018
1784855950 1 5589074.msg66973256 1554927 335231
1784855937 2 5589074.msg66973256 1554927 335231
1784853733 10 5589173.msg66973208 1068464 35
1784853190 1 5331343.msg56809456 33156 459836
1784853183 1 5589099.msg66971177 33156 839568
1784853180 4 5588886.msg66959656 33156 317618
1784853178 1 178336.msg66972944 33156 998490
1784852700 1 178336.msg66972487 120694 198573
1784852555 1 178336.msg66973275 120694 1112467
1784852507 1 178336.msg66972278 120694 198573
1784851739 1 5572859.msg66970787 938833 839568
1784851268 1 5588655.msg66950370 525056 1059082
1784851117 4 5589173.msg66973208 1137579 35
1784849048 1 2235093.msg66969890 1251526 1166480
1784847656 1 178336.msg66972699 198573 33156
1784847569 1 178336.msg66970737 120694 33156
1784847542 1 178336.msg66970535 120694 1852120
1784847413 1 178336.msg66972960 198573 64507
1784847356 1 178336.msg66972781 198573 3704398
1784846968 3 5588539.msg66971643 64507 2724574
1784846959 1 232519.msg66969019 3580301 3558873
1784846335 2 631891.msg66967898 3418694 1949590
1784845884 2 5588886.msg66972312 3322606 33156
1784845654 1 5587641.msg66912803 85033 1349691
1784844613 2 5588886.msg66962146 3322606 35
1784843712 3 178336.msg66972487 64507 198573
1784843171 1 5588539.msg66971643 64507 2724574
1784842937 1 178336.msg66972699 998490 33156
1784841869 3 5548712.msg65547638 3715666 3601488
1784840501 1 5589165.msg66971010 1554927 3608509
1784840265 3 5589160.msg66970680 1554927 3254306
1784840144 1 631891.msg66967898 3543045 1949590
1784840071 1 5588886.msg66972151 1137579 3704391
1784839822 1 5589017.msg66972689 1280964 1041310
1784839615 1 5589135.msg66969798 3587984 3728458
1784839529 1 5546384.msg66972190 252510 3508007
1784839433 4 5588886.msg66959656 33156 317618
1784839418 4 178336.msg66969962 198573 569455
1784839281 1 5376945.msg66972637 252510 3611472
1784839242 1 5589202.msg66972006 3701436 333827
1784839229 1 5589170.msg66971241 3701436 3742085
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2151 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 24 Jul 2026 04:40:31 AM CEST, Vispilio (history) sent 1 Merit to SUPERSAIAN (history) for BR1 INFINITE.
On Fri 24 Jul 2026 04:37:42 AM CEST, Vispilio (history) sent 1 Merit to MomusReign (history) for Polymarket ve Kalshi engellendi.
On Fri 24 Jul 2026 04:37:35 AM CEST, Vispilio (history) sent 1 Merit to yenerbatmaz (history) for Re: Polymarket ve Kalshi engellendi.
On Fri 24 Jul 2026 04:21:45 AM CEST, LastKiss (history) sent 1 Merit to AakZaki (history) for Re: IHSG Dump Parah!, Trader Saham Panik, Ramai-ramai ke Bitcoin?.
On Fri 24 Jul 2026 03:56:24 AM CEST, SamReomo (history) sent 4 Merit to icopress (history) for Re: 50+ Accounts Connected - Is it real? or probably I'm drunk 🥴.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (604 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8825 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 935 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3762860: PolarCrypto (history) earned: 6 Merit.
3762899: Akos26 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3763135: Geould (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3763248: xxxmourn (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3763270: swapsslol (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3760228: lll555
3760243: proofra
3760275: Neha2399
3760276: DragonBites
3760305: redtrusts
3760506: smf24
3760625: gijane
3760686: legendo
3760707: aodrbxo
3760791: swedoc
3760817: lastpixellive
3760902: borrowonbitcoin
3760961: Ethereum1
3761001: buffetto
3761071: Droppies
3761141: paidfully
3761153: mickpaoli
3761170: Soulistic
3761181: nadanada_me
3761237: IsItMiCACompliant
3761238: xmrbro
3761264: GHOTO11
3761348: Gmax98005
3761385: shaketank
3761497: niso23
3761513: Casper7
3761530: Priamex.com
3761538: Benedesuuuk
3761595: Khaleedmaine
3761676: Lytvynets1
3761774: scoorched
3761923: Korvane.io
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw
3762178: Bamskki
3762182: Aliikhanii
3762184: xiaoyu1222006
3762275: DigitalDonkeyBlocks
3762314: apide01
3762360: Midisk
3762435: exWhale
3762577: Sowat
3762578: sidrabtc
3762721: Fire_man
3762844: monerica
3762860: PolarCrypto
3762899: Akos26
3763135: Geould
3763248: xxxmourn
3763270: swapsslol

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8825
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:1
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14458:14878
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1492
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3760228:0:1
3760243:0:5
3760275:0:2
3760276:0:2
3760305:0:3
3760506:0:1
3760625:0:1
3760686:0:2
3760707:0:3
3760791:0:1
3760817:0:5
3760902:0:3
3760961:0:2
3761001:0:2
3761071:0:2
3761141:0:1
3761153:0:1
3761170:2:5
3761181:0:1
3761237:0:3
3761238:0:5
3761264:0:1
3761348:0:1
3761385:0:1
3761497:0:23
3761513:0:2
3761530:0:11
3761538:2:15
3761595:1:7
3761676:0:2
3761774:0:1
3761923:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1
3762178:0:5
3762182:0:1
3762184:0:1
3762275:0:2
3762314:0:3
3762360:0:1
3762435:0:1
3762577:0:1
3762578:0:1
3762721:0:1
3762844:0:2
3762860:0:6
3762899:0:1
3763135:0:2
3763248:0:1
3763270:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51615
Sample

Code:

1. 21346 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1118 unique users in 12358 transactions
2. 21101 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 768 unique users in 11544 transactions
3. 18897 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9988 transactions
4. 15615 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8960 transactions
5. 14878 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1228 unique users in 5403 transactions
6. 13761 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 733 unique users in 9071 transactions
7. 13112 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 609 unique users in 4900 transactions
8. 12027 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 503 unique users in 6621 transactions
9. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
10. 11841 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 529 unique users in 6097 transactions
11. 11386 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 614 unique users in 6629 transactions
12. 11373 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6471 transactions
13. 11265 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 587 unique users in 6475 transactions
14. 10456 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 665 unique users in 5643 transactions
15. 10426 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5325 transactions
16. 10201 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 562 unique users in 4551 transactions
17. 10081 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 405 unique users in 3503 transactions
18. 10038 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 343 unique users in 3697 transactions
19. 9945 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 470 unique users in 4979 transactions
20. 9913 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 454 unique users in 5416 transactions
21. 9901 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 537 unique users in 4564 transactions
22. 9217 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 4990 transactions
23. 8921 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 411 unique users in 4603 transactions
24. 8885 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 585 unique users in 5259 transactions
25. 8825 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 412 unique users in 933 transactions
26. 8771 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 456 unique users in 5196 transactions
27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
28. 8177 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 461 unique users in 4485 transactions
29. 7633 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 592 unique users in 4530 transactions
30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
31. 7315 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4210 transactions
32. 7262 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1869 transactions
33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
34. 6932 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 229 unique users in 3970 transactions
35. 6902 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3500 transactions
36. 6825 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 399 unique users in 3753 transactions
37. 6779 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 347 unique users in 3183 transactions
38. 6776 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3042 transactions
39. 6730 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 956 unique users in 4380 transactions
40. 6698 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 491 unique users in 3714 transactions
41. 6638 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 529 unique users in 3833 transactions
42. 6477 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 206 unique users in 3750 transactions
43. 6475 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 429 unique users in 3544 transactions
44. 6448 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 436 unique users in 3768 transactions
45. 6364 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 626 unique users in 3583 transactions
46. 6269 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3493 transactions
47. 6265 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3643 transactions
48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
49. 5759 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2729 transactions
50. 5745 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 460 unique users in 4038 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51566. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51567. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51568. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51569. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51570. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51571. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51572. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51573. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51574. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51575. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51576. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51577. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51578. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51579. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51580. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51581. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51582. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51583. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51584. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51585. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51586. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51587. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51588. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51589. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51590. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51591. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51592. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51593. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51594. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51595. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51596. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51597. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51598. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51599. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51600. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51601. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51602. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51603. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51604. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51605. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51606. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51607. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51608. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51609. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51610. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51611. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51612. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51613. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51614. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51615. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26716
Sample

Code:

1. 76722 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 910 unique users in 13060 transactions
2. 71671 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2298 unique users in 31365 transactions
3. 69040 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3348 unique users in 18067 transactions
4. 62197 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3653 unique users in 59959 transactions
5. 60275 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4728 unique users in 34510 transactions
6. 53828 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3787 unique users in 37138 transactions
7. 45357 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2924 unique users in 16064 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 39051 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2543 unique users in 14510 transactions
10. 38335 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2964 unique users in 31053 transactions
11. 35726 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1598 unique users in 14190 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 33248 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2196 unique users in 11377 transactions
14. 32837 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1494 unique users in 10459 transactions
15. 29880 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1465 unique users in 7826 transactions
16. 29255 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1731 unique users in 6853 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
20. 23335 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1387 unique users in 9555 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18206 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1784 unique users in 4100 transactions
23. 17062 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 568 unique users in 8023 transactions
24. 16832 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 753 unique users in 6263 transactions
25. 16591 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1750 unique users in 7593 transactions
26. 16421 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1203 unique users in 9373 transactions
27. 16248 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2006 unique users in 6605 transactions
28. 15279 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5490 transactions
29. 15108 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1332 unique users in 8500 transactions
30. 14631 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1692 unique users in 7645 transactions
31. 14458 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1109 unique users in 1775 transactions
32. 14425 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3164 unique users in 7563 transactions
33. 13625 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 666 unique users in 3643 transactions
34. 13481 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1153 unique users in 8244 transactions
35. 13453 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1362 unique users in 7459 transactions
36. 13422 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6296 transactions
37. 13393 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5907 transactions
38. 13240 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 850 unique users in 4300 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11966 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1198 unique users in 6538 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8667 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 585 unique users in 7389 transactions
45. 8576 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1064 unique users in 3722 transactions
46. 8559 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 759 unique users in 7407 transactions
47. 8442 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 524 unique users in 6670 transactions
48. 8403 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 333 unique users in 3385 transactions
49. 8226 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 961 unique users in 3591 transactions
50. 8093 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 670 unique users in 2507 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26667. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26668. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26669. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26670. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26671. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26672. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26673. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26674. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26675. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26676. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26677. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26678. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26679. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26680. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26681. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26682. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26683. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26684. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26685. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26686. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26687. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26688. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26689. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26690. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26691. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26692. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26693. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26694. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26695. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26696. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26697. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26698. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26699. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26700. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26701. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26702. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26703. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26705. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26706. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26707. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26708. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26709. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26710. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26711. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26712. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26713. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26714. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26715. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26716. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 339794 (14.38%)
Tuesday 339318 (14.36%)
Wednesday 338908 (14.35%)
Thursday 359940 (15.24%)
Friday 357276 (15.12%)
Saturday 311049 (13.17%)
Sunday 315275 (13.35%)
Total: 2361560

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:49:52 AM

It's sad, but the best lessons are learned when they happen to you personally. Never trust anyone who claims they want to make you money and they are there to help you. Bullshit. They want to help themselves and make money off of you. People who consider unsolicited investment opportunities as scams and the people who contact them as scammers will be better off than individuals willing to hear them out and give it a try. It's a nasty world out there, so be careful. Don't be the small fish that gets eaten.

Harshest and painful lesson usually came from our personal experience. But its really good for us to learn on the mistakes made by others, so we will not experience the same bad faith as what those people already tried.

Also anyone offering easy way to earn money is for sure looking to earn money on you. So basically we should treat all those random offers as scam.

Since its more safer for us to ignore those offerings they have made. Rather than trying to take the risk and use our hard earned money. In this industry awareness will help us survive knowing there are so many scammers in internet.

Quote from: Pmalek on July 29, 2026, 06:57:18 PM

I have removed Fairlay from the list. However, I won't add Bitcoin Betting. I created an account there and I couldn't find native Bitcoin among the withdrawal options. I only see Ether, Rootstock Bitcoin, and BTC from RBTC.

Understandable. I used to use Fairlay way back which was a decent site by itself, but never got around to using it despite their great odds primarily due to low liquidities and no native BTC support as you mentioned yourself which is truly odd.

I believe Fairlay itself used to support native BTC. Furthermore, not many use the tokenized versions. Weird!

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:57:18 PM

I have removed Fairlay from the list. However, I won't add Bitcoin Betting. I created an account there and I couldn't find native Bitcoin among the withdrawal options. I only see Ether, Rootstock Bitcoin, and BTC from RBTC.

Every rBTC equals to BTC that is held by Rootstock. You can withdraw rBTC and convert to BTC in https://powpeg.rootstock.io

You can deposit native btc that is bridged but to withdraw they did not add any official bridge, but it's not hard to do yourself after you receive the rBTC

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:57:18 PM

I have removed Fairlay from the list. However, I won't add Bitcoin Betting. I created an account there and I couldn't find native Bitcoin among the withdrawal options. I only see Ether, Rootstock Bitcoin, and BTC from RBTC.

I support this decision.
Last year I first time heard about bitcoin betting casino, and I was shocked when I found out they dont even support bitcoin.
It is stupid and funny thing for them to add bitcoin in the name of your branding and website, and not even support that coin.

Not the first,wont be last either..
I remember Pmalek created a thread about similar Fake sparrow wallet that stole BTC from a long term holder :https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5552731.0 . I think he also lauched a campaign that took down a fake sparrow wallet.. it's back again Tongue

I don't understand why someone with so much money just decide to download a wallet with zero research on a mobile wallet.. A quick search will even tell them Sparrow has no mobile wallet .

They can go ahead, give it a try but once again, there's high chance they get away with it as usual..

Some people don't learn easily..

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:18:34 AM

Quote from: knuckey on July 28, 2026, 07:26:02 PM

Bayer Leverkusen vs KRC Genk (Bayer Leverkusen Win)
Atletico Madrid vs Getafe CF (Atletico Win)

Snip

At this stage of preparation for the upcoming season these teams don't yet have the strength.
Snip

The current interim result is that Bayern Leverkusen won in a very easy way, Atlético's schedule seems to be disrupted because the time is TBD.

Quote from: slaman29 on Today at 07:41:25 AM

Snip

Quote from: knuckey on July 28, 2026, 07:26:02 PM

Just wanted to have some fun placing a small bet to get the adrenaline pumping. I know it's an unimportant match, but I wanted to capitalize on each team's strengths.

Bayer Leverkusen vs KRC Genk (Bayer Leverkusen Win)
Atletico Madrid vs Getafe CF (Atletico Win)

What do you think of the two bets I just made?
I'm a little worried that the players won't expend much energy in this match.

Snip
BTW I like the picks, both clubs you selected want a good preseason, and new players want to impress while old players want a new contract

Thank you for reminding me I will come back refreshed and with more time, we will discuss later there is still a little time left

Quote from: Pumared on Today at 02:01:50 PM

Quote from: knuckey on July 28, 2026, 07:26:02 PM

Just wanted to have some fun placing a small bet to get the adrenaline pumping. I know it's an unimportant match, but I wanted to capitalize on each team's strengths.

Bayer Leverkusen vs KRC Genk (Bayer Leverkusen Win)
Atletico Madrid vs Getafe CF (Atletico Win)

What do you think of the two bets I just made?
I'm a little worried that the players won't expend much energy in this match.

If you want some really good excitement, there's a Flamengo game today in the Brazilian championship. The odds are very good for a Flamengo win, I got 0.9. It's interesting for those who want excitement and a game where anything can happen.

Good advice even though I don't really follow Brazilian football matches, it seems that Flamengo will win, playing as a guest (away) is the main challenge for Flamengo, so I decided to put a little on Flamengo

Quote from: mitchr4 on Today at 02:36:38 PM

Quote from: knuckey on July 28, 2026, 07:26:02 PM

Just wanted to have some fun placing a small bet to get the adrenaline pumping. I know it's an unimportant match, but I wanted to capitalize on each team's strengths.

Bayer Leverkusen vs KRC Genk (Bayer Leverkusen Win)
Atletico Madrid vs Getafe CF (Atletico Win)

What do you think of the two bets I just made?
I'm a little worried that the players won't expend much energy in this match.

Right now, Leverkusen looks like an easy win since the score is already 4-0. Too bad the bet was single, so it feels less exciting Cheesy

. Club friendly matches can make betting feel a little risky, because players do not always try their best to win or lose. But there are not many good matches for betting right now, since the league season has not started yet. Having friendly matches like this at least gives another option to keep betting while waiting for real competitions to start again after the World Cup.

The excitement and interest in watching is also not that exciting, so I bet just on luck LOL Cheesy

Quote from: Pmalek on October 09, 2025, 06:57:15 AM

But even if you enable the option to take screenshots, your wallet security can only be impacted if you take screenshots of your seed or private keys. There is no reason to do that, of course.

The developers added the by-default-enabled screenshot protection as a direct response to Windows Recall being introduced by Microsoft under which the OS itself every few seconds takes screenshots of the whole screen. That represents a direct reasonable pathway to having a screenshot taken of your seed words without your knowledge.

Quote from: Pmalek on July 26, 2026, 07:34:05 AM

At first glance, I would agree with the player. If what we have been told here is the whole story and they don't have reasons to believe there is an issue with the integrity of the match he bet on (match fixing, etc.), the bet should be settled as a win. Why would a bookie offer betting options on such leagues if there can be problems like betting fraud or whatever?

A question for the OP. A match from Myanmar's U20 league, really? Are you from Myanmar or live close by?

No, I am not from Myanmar and I do not live nearby.

At that time, there were very few live events available, so the choice of matches and markets was limited. My bets were not placed only on Myanmar events either. I also placed bets on events from other countries and competitions.

I had no connection to the teams, players, league, or match officials, and I had no inside information. If this had really been a fixed match and I had possessed reliable inside information, it would make little sense to place only a $23 bet — logically, the amount would have been much larger.

I simply selected one of the live events openly offered by the bookmaker. The bookmaker accepted the bet without any warning, settled it as a win, and removed the winnings only after I requested a withdrawal. Their support did not accuse me of match-fixing or insider betting. Their only explanation was that I had bet on “weak markets in low-level events.”

thank you, holydarkness!

Pmalek, What is the point of customer support? Just to send me a copy-pasted message? The whole idea of support is to help you and provide clear information, not just "robot" messages. I find it hard to believe there isn't someone to check documents that have already been verified by their system—taking about 10 days for that? Let's be serious.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:41:45 PM

One reason is KYC. A traditional online casino requires identity verification and usually from the get-go. Not only that, but you will probably also be asked to undergo address verification as well. Crypto casinos aren't 100% KYC-free but many can be. If you play moderately, respect the rules, and don't do anything suspicious, then you can deposit and withdraw without ever needing to verify your identity or having to upload your personal information to an online database somewhere that could be hacked and end up on the internet.

KYC is one reason, but I don't think this will be the reason why cryptocurrencies will become so popular in online gambling in the future because most reputable casinos now require KYC verification. I won't say that there are no casinos where gambling cannot be done without KYC verification, but even then people cannot fully trust those casinos like they do in top-level casinos.

And that's why I think the main reason why cryptocurrency is becoming more popular on gambling websites is the move away from using traditional banks. The word bank means more regulation, centralization, restrictions on transactions, high fees, statements etc. However, in the case of cryptocurrency, none of these things exist and transactions can be completed quickly from any place on the earth.

And if I talk about my country, gambling is banned here and if the government somehow finds a connection from your account to an account related to a gambling site in a banking transaction or mobile banking transaction, then you may have to go to jail. And here th cryptocurrency is the saviour of gamblers.

This is the bigger withdrawal, but not the one.
In march i Made 3 withdrawal of 17k 7k and 5k in a sigle day.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:57:02 PM

The requested €25,000 withdrawal is significantly larger than the other transactions visible in the screenshot (€2k and €5k). Casinos sometimes take more time when processing bigger withdrawals and they will also investigate them. Such investigations are carried out by third-party game providers. In your case, it's BGaming because you won the money on Elvis Frog in Vegas.

My guess is that is the reason for the delay. They processed two smaller withdrawals while the big one is pending. If they suspected you of being in violation of their rules, they wouldn't have done that. Everything would have been paused while you were under investigation. Let's hope it's nothing serious.

Kao sto sam obecao ranije danas Daniel91, evo i mjesecnog pregleda naseg boarda za mjesec Lipanj. Pregled je standardno napravljen uz pomoc pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Lipanj 2026 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

Analiza broja postova tijekom Lipnja 2026

Tijekom Lipnja na nasem boardu je napisano 334 posta, sto je neznatan pad u odnosu na svibanjske brojke (342 posta). S obzirom da se tijekom ljeta generalno smanjuje aktivnost, ova brojka je zapravo odlicna te se nadam da cemo nataviti u istom tonu i ostatak ljeta.

Analiza merita za Lipanj 2026

Iako je broj postova ostao skoro kao i tijekom Svibnja, broj merita je znacajno pao, pa je tako tijekom Lipnja podijljeno 174 merita sto je dosta manje od svibanjskih 288. Unatoc padu, mislim da je to i dalje dobar broj, jer i dalje znaci da ni jedan kvalitetan post ne bi trebao ostati bez merita.

Na vrhu liste su ista imena ka i prethodnih mjeseci: na vrhu posiljatelja je Pmalek sa 48 merita, dok je na vrhu liste primatelja katanic98 sa 51 merita.

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Lipnja 2026

I za sam kraj, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu tijekom Lipnja, koja je za jedno mjesto duza nego prethodni mjesec. Na vrhu liste je ponovno Daniel91, slackovic je sa 5. mjesta dosao do 2. dok je katanic97zadrzao 3. mjesto.

1. Daniel91 [45]
2. slackovic [42]
3. katanic97 [34]
4. ovcijisir [31]
5. Rikafip [31]
6. Pmalek [29]
7. Ceemv22 [21]
8. dkbit98 [19]
9. examplens [17]
10. GazetaBitcoin [15]
11. SirJohnVonSlotty [10]
12. BitGoba [9]
13. cryptofrka [7]
14. Trofo [6]
15. CroBoy12 [5]
16. Joca97 [3]
17. VoxelX [3]
18. ivek2021 [3]
19. EXMON [1]
20. b1ack [1]
21. BitcoinBtTeam [1]
22. fibonacciopstan [1]

Quote from: Pmalek on July 26, 2026, 02:46:31 PM

Quote from: SeriouslyGiveaway on July 26, 2026, 02:36:09 PM

With step 2, Earn XP, they have short description

Quote

Every wager adds to your experience points (XP).

That's obviously an incorrect description if players can only collect XP points by playing original games. The EarnBet team should take a minute to correct that. It's not right to tell the bettors that all wagers count and increase your points if the reality is different.

I don't know, things can be changed by the business with time, it's how business works and honestly I don't know what was XP points and how to earn those points on Earnbet were initially.

If it was changed, they must inform users about that.
If it was exactly like this since the start so far, they have lacked of a necessary guidance for Earnbet users.

And now it can be time for making some changes, if they want.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:40:41 AM

Welcome to the forum!

You should enable a standard registration option with email + password, without requiring players to connect third-party accounts to the casino if they don't want to.
If you aren't licensed, who is asking you to be compliant and collect KYC and private information on players?

Your OP says "Fast Deposits | Low Fees." Does that mean players are charged fees on deposits? My guess is that it doesn't but I thought it important to clarify this.

Yeah, they probably can't lol. Looking at the backend, it just seems like a white label casino. The login, Google auth, and pretty much the whole site look like they're handled by Insolve, not Hazebet.

Those white labels aren't that expensive either. I've seen them go for around $4k plus 10% GGR. Because of that, I wouldn't expect Hazebet to have much control over the platform. They can probably just manage the bankroll, player accounts, and a few settings through Insolve's admin panel.

Obviously nobody knows what their agreement with Insolve looks like, so they could have a bit more access. But from what it looks like, they don't really have control over the core code.

Quote from: acroman08 on Today at 12:06:03 AM

Quote from: logfiles on July 26, 2026, 10:51:43 PM

As far as I know, Cloudbet Geo-blocks users from banned countries.

Tried to verify this using a free VPN with a UK IP(London), but I can still access it, but when if I use an IP from the Netherlands(Amsterdam), it does block the website.

I have also tried with VPN and noticed that they aren't showing the geo-blocking message for some restricted countries while I'm logged out of my account. But Cloudbet is showing this error message while I'm logged in by using the UK and those restricted countries IP addresses.

@Pmalek, England isn't in the restricted jurisdiction list of Cloudbet. Anyway, Cloudbet should have allowed OP to withdraw his funds according to the above message. But OP's issue is actually different. He has stated this in his post:

Quote from: Tennisguy on July 26, 2026, 07:54:14 PM

~snip~ They said i had another account previously banned which may be true but with no kyc checks in place initially then really they are opening themselves up for this. ~

OP said 'may be true' while Cloudbet accused him of creating multiple accounts. Which means he doesn't care about the online casino's terms. So, I think it is fair for Cloudbet to confiscate his deposits based on the terms '7.1.10.3'.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:40:41 AM

Welcome to the forum!

You should enable a standard registration option with email + password, without requiring players to connect third-party accounts to the casino if they don’t want to.
If you aren’t licensed, who is asking you to be compliant and collect KYC and private information on players?

Your OP says “Fast Deposits | Low Fees.” Does that mean players are charged fees on deposits? My guess is that it doesn’t but I thought it important to clarify this.

Thanks for the warm welcome and for your feedback!

You’re absolutely right about the registration process. We’re already working on adding a standard email + password registration option, so users won’t have to rely on third-party accounts if they don’t want to.

Regarding KYC, nobody is currently requiring us to perform it. We included a risk-based KYC policy in our Terms from the beginning because we want to be transparent about our long-term plans. Since obtaining a gaming license is part of our roadmap, we don’t want to market ourselves as a “No KYC” casino today and potentially disappoint our community later if licensing requirements change. We’d rather set realistic expectations from the start.

You also make a good point about the “Fast Deposits | Low Fees” wording. There are no fees charged by HazeBet for deposits or withdrawals. The only fees users pay are the standard blockchain network fees associated with cryptocurrency transactions. We agree the wording could be clearer, and we’ll update it to avoid any confusion.

Thanks again for taking the time to point these things out. Feedback like this is incredibly valuable, especially while we’re still in the early stages after launch.

Quote from: katanic97 on July 25, 2026, 09:52:59 AM

Quote from: Daniel91 on July 25, 2026, 08:10:08 AM

Quote from: Rikafip on July 25, 2026, 07:38:36 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on July 25, 2026, 07:04:44 AM

Je li mu stari account hakiran ili ga je samo napustio. Mislim da sam negdje bookmarkovao njegov kontakt. Nek stoji, možda zatreba jednog dana.

Ne cini mi se da je hackiran, a i vidim da je bio online u zadnjih mjesec dana tako da nije skroz napusten.

Quote from: Pmalek on July 25, 2026, 07:04:44 AM

Zar on nije imao Telegram kanal gdje su svi mogli da pišu, prodaju, kupuju... pa ga je onda zaključao za komentare pa više niko nije mogao da piše niti komentariše bilo šta. Je li to sve ugašeno?

Da, imao je grupu gdje se mogla oglasavati kupnja i prodaja kripta, ali je zbog scammera koji su uspjevali povremeno prevariti ljude na kraju zabranio pisanje i oglasavanje na grupi te ju je koristio samo za svoje oglasavanje. A na kraju je izgleda i obrisao samu grupu jer je ne mogu vise naci.

Da, deaktivirao je staru grupu i kreirao potpuno novu grupu, u koju je pozvao samo ''provjerene'' kontakte iz prijašnje grupe.
U novoj grupi radi isto što je radio i u staroj, kupovinu i prodaju crypta.
Također je kreirao novi Telegram profile.
I u novoj grupi može pisati samo admin a ulazi se isključivo po pozivnici.
Slažem se da je razlog za to bio jer mu je staru grupu bilo teško kontrolirati, previše ljudi, scama...

Gledam ti ja jednom tu grupu i nisam mogao da verujem koliko scamova je bilo tu,sta se sve desavalo,za kakve sume novca su ljudi bili scamovani i na kakav nacin,i to sve uzivo. Mogao si bar 3 sata citati samo o scamovima . Zato i verujem da mu je sve to bilo puno i dobro je sto ima takvu vrstu grupe gde samo budu pozvani korisnici.

Da, u toj staroj grupi bilo je nekoliko tisuća članova, a na žalost i puno prevaranata.
Puno njih bi jednostavno kreirali neku varijantu Edinog username-a i dok se ne bi otkrilo da se radi o lažnom Edi, već bi puno ljudi bilo prevareno i izgubilo svoj kripto.
Iako Edo, naravno, nije bio odgovoran za to, ipak se to događalo u njegovoj Telegram grupi i čovjek je odlučio da mu je dosta.
Zatvorio je tu grupu i kreirao novu u koju je osobno pozvao samo provjerene članove iz stare grupe, samo admin može pisati u grupi (u svezi kupnje i prodaje crypta) tako da sada sve ide direktno preko njega i scamova više nema.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:01:39 PM

When a user performs an exchange, can they see which liquidity providers are involved in the operation? Do they have an option to select or deselect LPs they like or don't like? If that's not possible, then I think you should enable that option. Similarly, can users decide if they want to swap using your native reserves or go through third-party liquidity providers?

You mentioned that in case transactions require further verification and KYC, you prefer to return the money to the user, but you can't guarantee that will happen when third-party liquidity providers are involved. They will have custody of the funds. They can temporarily freeze them, confiscate them, or send them back. You are just the middleman in cases like that, communicating to end-users what the third parties told you.

At the moment, all exchanges on our platform are processed through liquidity providers. Currently, users cannot choose a specific liquidity provider or exclude individual providers from the exchange route. We understand that this functionality may be useful for some users, and we will certainly consider implementing it in the future.

Regarding KYC and potential restrictions imposed by liquidity providers, this is a matter we take very seriously.

Our goal is to prevent such situations whenever possible. That is why we work only with carefully selected liquidity providers that follow a balanced and reasonable AML approach.

We also strongly encourage users to check their cryptocurrency using an AML screening service or simply contact our support team before initiating an exchange. We will honestly tell you whether we can process your transaction, and if we identify any potential risks, we will inform you in advance.

Every case is reviewed individually, and we always strive to find the best possible solution for our customers.

SLOTS

1   - Leahized
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   - bitmover
7   - Royal Cap
8   - zasad@
9   - Fulllove1
10   - FinneysTrueVision
11   - LokhcfyBit
12   -
13   - Chibit01
14   - Forsyth Jones
15   - Ricardo11
16   -
17   - Antdm
18   -
19   - r_victory
20   - LogitechMouse
21   -
22   - Obari
23   -
24   - osasshem
25   - Warkop
26   - TryNinja
27   - DokuAd
28   -
29   - cryptobest4all
30   - Cointikka
31   -
32   -
33   - Yoona_As
34   - Hatchy
35   -
36   -
37   -
38   - Zangi777
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   - tvplus006
45   - f150
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   - Wolimmon
50   - BADERO
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   - xGennady
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   - HarvestOpan
66   -
67   - wengibway
68   -
69   - LNC999
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   - Taricoins
78   - lovesmayfamilis
79   - Qjmak333
80   -
81   -
82   - Pmalek
83   -
84   - bitzizzix
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   - viljy
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   - snowpega
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   - Debbiecrypto
98   -
99   - Smartprofit
100   - Alvin_talk

Its time for yet another brief overview of local boards activity, and this time for June 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview anyway.

Post activity per local board during June 2026

During June, 13659 posts were written across 18 local boards, which is a small decrease compared to May numbers (13781). No change at the top 3: Nigerian far ahead, followed by Russian and Turkish local boards, while Pakistani overtook German board at the 4th spot.

I wonder what are Pakistani members missing in order to get the local board, since their numbers are strong month after month, and its going on for years.

Active members per local board during June 2026

1290 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards, and is a small decrease compared to month before, as during May 1322 members were active. Nigerian board once again had more than 400 active members, while Russian board was far behind with still respectable 282 members. On the other side of the chart, the usual names- Romanian and Greek, and Bengali is slowly joining them.

Local board members per amount of posts during June 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, the leader is Greek board with 62% while at the same time Pakistan had only 13% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French board with 56%, while Greek had 12% members.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Croatian with 50%, and French board had no members who wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during June 2026

During June, 6573 merit was sent across local board, making it decrease compared to May, during which 6655 merit was sent. Even though there was a small decrease compared to month before, one big board had a huge increase, and that is German board that went from 489 merit in May to 1267 in June.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during June 2026

In June, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, exactly the same as in May. This time Italian board had the highest ratio, followed by German and Romanian locals, while Greek dropped down to a very low 0.03 merit per post.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during June 2026

525 members sent while 601 received merit in one of the local boards, whixch is not a big change compared to May (536 senders, 586 receivers). Needless to say, Nigerian board is dominating this chart as well, even more than in previous months, while French is joining Greek board at the bottom.

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during June 2026

Once again Romanian board is at the top of this chart with 59% of merited posts, while Italian is not that far behind with respectable 52%. And then we have Greek board where only 0.03 posts got merited (translated, 1 post).

Merit per transaction across local boards during June 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that gives a little bit more info on meriting habits of each local board.

The most active members per local board during June 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. After few months, joker_josue from Portuguese board is once again at the top with 153 posts, while jokers10 (138) and Numeral (128) from Russian board are at the 2nd and 3rd spot. Gj guys, keep it up!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. jokers10 [138]	\|	1. mole0815 [65]	\|	1. mandown [109]	\|	1. Ale88 [45]	\|	1. joker_josue [153]	\|	1. Porfirii [33]	\|
2. Numeral [128]	\|	2. MaxMueller [63]	\|	2. Phoenix Anka [63]	\|	2. babo [44]	\|	2. sabotag3x [97]	\|	2. famososMuertos [25]	\|
3. safar1980 [111]	\|	3. cygan [61]	\|	3. Xyloo [61]	\|	3. Plutosky [44]	\|	3. bitmover [67]	\|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [24]	\|
4. klarki [107]	\|	4. MinoRaiola [57]	\|	4. yenerbatmaz [60]	\|	4. Italian Panic [44]	\|	4. TryNinja [50]	\|	4. Filicius [23]	\|
5. Julien_Olynpic [102]	\|	5. Soonandwaite [55]	\|	5. kriminall [58]	\|	5. gbianchi [40]	\|	5. alegotardo [48]	\|	5. seoincorporation [20]	\|
6. tvplus006 [97]	\|	6. Lakai01 [53]	\|	6. MK-74 [58]	\|	6. fillippone [35]	\|	6. Forsyth Jones [39]	\|	6. clarkk01 [20]	\|
7. internetional [82]	\|	7. 5tift [47]	\|	7. Mustang Shelby [57]	\|	7. bitbollo [33]	\|	7. mikel_012 [28]	\|	7. darxiaomi [18]	\|
8. dwyane36 [79]	\|	8. Koal-84 [40]	\|	8. Hvdv [55]	\|	8. Cassius55 [19]	\|	8. criptoevangelista [28]	\|	8. danadc [15]	\|
9. Alex077 [71]	\|	9. Real-Duke [36]	\|	9. RaltcoinsB [54]	\|	9. Paolo.Demidov [18]	\|	9. marrcelo [28]	\|	9. GazetaBitcoin [14]	\|
10. zasad@ [69]	\|	10. Buchi-88 [27]	\|	10. Valcendier [51]	\|	10. bitcoiner180 [16]	\|	10. rdluffy [26]	\|	10. Marmeladka.cc [12]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [110]	\|	1. AURORE12 [5]	\|	1. Peanutswar [48]	\|	1. Daniel91 [45]	\|	1. Floxynice [99]	\|	1. khaled0111 [35]	\|
2. Husna QA [43]	\|	2. winspiral [4]	\|	2. Asuspawer09 [35]	\|	2. slackovic [42]	\|	2. Plutomanian [70]	\|	2. Kavelj22 [34]	\|
3. joniboini [39]	\|	3. TryNinja [4]	\|	3. tech30338 [30]	\|	3. katanic97 [34]	\|	3. Africolo [50]	\|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	\|
4. mu_enrico [37]	\|	4. patrickus [3]	\|	4. arwin100 [29]	\|	4. ovcijisir [31]	\|	4. Mr Reporter [49]	\|	4. OmegaStarScream [17]	\|
5. kawetsriyanto [36]	\|	5. genius89 [3]	\|	5. blockman [27]	\|	5. Rikafip [31]	\|	5. Charles-Tim [39]	\|	5. Ochan_yazo_tochant [11]	\|
6. AakZaki [33]	\|	6. Danydee [2]	\|	6. GreatArkansas [27]	\|	6. Pmalek [29]	\|	6. Tetu100 [38]	\|	6. hugeblack [10]	\|
7. Luzin [30]	\|	7. Halab [2]	\|	7. cryptoaddictchie [23]	\|	7. Ceemv22 [21]	\|	7. Qhunman [36]	\|	7. GxSTxV [5]	\|
8. taufik123 [27]	\|	8. daniosem [2]	\|	8. Fredomago [22]	\|	8. dkbit98 [19]	\|	8. Hypnotizer [36]	\|	8. daniosem [4]	\|
9. TedMosby [17]	\|	9. fibonacciopstan [2]	\|	9. bhadz [22]	\|	9. examplens [17]	\|	9. BluebloodCXVI [35]	\|	9. aseemhamza [3]	\|
10. masulum [17]	\|	10. EXMON [1]	\|	10. julerz12 [21]	\|	10. GazetaBitcoin [15]	\|	10. Agbamoni [34]	\|	10. Baristotle [2]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [17]	\|	1. Cointikka [51]	\|	1. cryptosize [13]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [33]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [82]	\|	1. Bd officer [17]	\|
2. wwzsocki [14]	\|	2. Bitcoin Smith [44]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [12]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [7]	\|	2. Fragrance1122 [49]	\|	2. Crypto Library [14]	\|
3. pawel7777 [7]	\|	3. JSRAW [32]	\|	3. alani123 [4]	\|	3. TryNinja [4]	\|	3. JunaidAzizi [44]	\|	3. Review Master [13]	\|
4. TryNinja [4]	\|	4. pawanjain [29]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [1]	\|	4. Adiljutt156 [1]	\|	4. Bityar [37]	\|	4. DYING_S0UL [13]	\|
5. ertil [2]	\|	5. vivekdhyani1 [18]	\|	5. Dimitris [1]	\|	5. b1ack [1]	\|	5. HustleZ [32]	\|	5. Shishir99 [9]	\|
6. Forsyth Jones [1]	\|	6. GazetaBitcoin [17]	\|	6. BitcoinsGreece [1]	\|		\|	6. Abdul Sami786 [31]	\|	6. Mahiyammahi [5]	\|
7. EXMON [1]	\|	7. eaLiTy [14]	\|	7. fibonacciopstan [1]	\|		\|	7. Junii [29]	\|	7. Z_MBFM [4]	\|
8. icopress [1]	\|	8. BitDiscussion [14]	\|	8. katsman [1]	\|		\|	8. Rustam Meraj [28]	\|	8. chotu1 [2]	\|
9. daniosem [1]	\|	9. TheUltraElite [10]	\|		\|		\|	9. MusaPk [25]	\|	9. Nothingtodo [2]	\|
10. atomicarthur [1]	\|	10. M47AK16 [8]	\|		\|		\|	10. Shussainshah [22]	\|	10. Talevin1234 [1]	\|

Quote from: Pmalek on July 25, 2026, 07:32:26 AM

At least you are not pretending to be a KYC-free exchange like many other services do.
I have some questions about your AML/KYC page. It's in Russian, so I had to translate it using the browser's native translation tool.

First you say this:

Quote

KYC (Know Your Customer) is a client identification and verification policy that is mandatory for all platform participants.

A few sentences further, you state the following:

Quote

In the event of suspicious or high-risk transactions, or as required by law, EXtratum.io reserves the right to request the sender of funds:

Passport details and a selfie/video selfie with the document.
Documents confirming the address of residence and source of funds (if necessary).
The video selfie must contain a passport with clearly visible data (series, number, full name) and a demonstration of the wallet from which the shipment was made.
Any other information necessary to continue the verification and comply with legal requirements.

Which one is it? Is KYC mandatory for everyone and from the start or does it kick in only for suspicious transactions/users?

Among your criteria for high-risk transactions, you mention "Fraudulent exchange." Can you give us a few examples of what fraudulent exchanges are?
You also mention gambling. That shouldn't be considered a high-risk transaction.
Sanctions is another high-risk transaction criteria. Really? You are a Russian-based service. You should know how harmful it is to to place an entire country and it's economy on a sanctions list. Are you going to prevent someone from Iran or Venezuela, for example, from using your service when you are both in the same boat?
Another criteria is "P2P Exchange Unlicensed." Can you give us a few examples of these unlicensed P2P exchanges?

Lastly, your chat is in Russian. Do your agents speak other languages besides Russian? How will you serve and provide support to international clients if they don't?

Thank you for your detailed comment and for taking the time to review our AML/KYC Policy.

You raised several important questions, and we would like to address each of them.

Regarding KYC, you correctly pointed out that the original wording of the Policy could create some ambiguity. Following an additional legal review, we revised the Policy and clarified the relevant provisions.

Using the Service means that the User agrees to the AML/KYC Policy and acknowledges that verification measures may be carried out in accordance with it. However, identity verification (KYC) is not automatically required for every user. It is performed only in cases required by applicable law or when a transaction is identified as suspicious or high-risk under our risk-based approach. This is how our Service operates in practice.

Regarding the Fraudulent Exchange category, it does not refer to ordinary cryptocurrency exchange services. It refers to addresses and services that specialized AML providers associate with fraudulent activity. The names of the risk categories in our Policy correspond to the classifications used by our AML screening provider and are not our own custom classifications.

The Gambling, Sanctions, and other categories also do not result in an automatic refusal of service. They are simply individual risk indicators considered during the overall assessment of a transaction. Every transaction is reviewed individually based on the combination of all relevant risk factors rather than on any single category alone.

The same applies to P2P Exchange Unlicensed. We do not create these categories ourselves—they reflect the terminology and classifications used by our AML screening provider and the results of its analysis.

We would also like to thank you for pointing out the localization issue. Your observation was entirely fair. At the time the Policy was published, an English version was not yet available, so users had to rely on browser-based machine translation.

Following your feedback, we completely revised the localization. We prepared a full English version of our AML/KYC Policy instead of relying on machine translation, carried out an additional legal review of the English version to ensure it fully corresponds to the Russian version, and continue improving the English localization of the Service.

As for customer support, we currently provide assistance in Russian, English, and Ukrainian, and we continue improving the Service to better serve our international users.

Once again, thank you for your constructive feedback. Several of your observations genuinely helped us improve the clarity and quality of our documentation. We value comments like yours, as they help us continue improving both the Service itself and the documentation provided to our users.