Pmalek's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Pmalek in the past 7 days

Quote from: Pmalek on December 28, 2025, 04:30:09 PM

I won a $25 free bet last week from a Whale.io raffle. I waited a few days to wager it, but decided to bet on Juventus - Pisa in Serie A last night.
The final result 0:2 makes it seem that Juventus won the match comfortably, but that wasn't the case at all. Pisa hit the bar and post before Juve scored. Juventus looked weak, and the manager made some unusual tactical changes by placing McKennie on the left wing and Cambiaso on the right. As soon as they switched, Juve started playing better.

Very nice win.
I like playing single bets but with higher odds, and last time I won big with one of the Whale freebets on Aston Villa win.
We dont have so many matches around New Year but Premier League and Seria A are a lifesavers.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:02:39 AM

/snip

Države i njene institucije prave od bitcoina problem i tretiraju ga na način koji vidiš. Bitcoin je dobro zamišljen ali da bi u praksi funkcionisao trebaš ga odvojiti od tih krvnika i zločinaca. Plati više u naknadama onima koji ne podržavaju ovu "taint" i "high-risk bitcoin" glupost. Trguj P2P ako možeš.

Korisnici bitcoina su krivi što CEX-ovi imaju toliku moć pa sebi dozvoljavaju da kradu od nas a mi im praštamo.

Da, s time se slažem. Nisam ni mislio na to da je mogućnost praćenja svakog satoshija loša generalno. Loša je samo zato što se regulativa lagano kreće prema tome da prati podrijetlo svakog satoshija i onda odlučuje je li on prljav ili čist. Meni je to totalna glupost zbog onoga što sam napisao. Ali opet, ne možemo očekivati da će CEX-ovi nestati samo zato jer nama ne odgovaraju. Jedino što možemo je prilagoditi se i stvarno za svaku stvar koristiti drugi wallet, koliko god to kompliciralo korištenje BTC-a.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:44:00 PM

A three-man midfield could be made up of Tonali, Joelington, and Bruno Guimaraes. There should be enough quality in midfield and attack to defeat Burnley.

Eddie Howe has preferred Ramsey to Joelington for recent matches, so it may not be their usual trio in the midfield. It's actually a change I've been expecting him to make and some Newcastle fans have been calling for it to add more creativity to the middle.

On paper Burnley should not be able to cope but Newcastle have a very poor away from which the Clarets may want to take advantage of. They are desperately in need of points to climb out of the relegation zone.

Iskreno, planirao sam izbaciti pregled sutra jer sam lijen, ali psoto me danas pitao Daniel kad ce lokalni pregled, evo ga sada. Cheesy

Kao i svaki put do sada, pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Studeni 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

Analiza broja postova tijekom Studenog 2025

Tijekom Studenog napisali smo 237 postova, sto je pad u odnosu na Listopad (289 postova). Slican pad je bio i na ostalim boardovima tako da nismo tu nikakva iznimka, jednostavno slabiji mjesec.

Analiza merita za Studeni 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca na nasem boardu je podijeljeno 228 merita, sto je pad u odnosu na listpadskih 281 merit. S obzirom na slican pad broja pootova, ovo ne iznenadjuje. Unatoc tome, mislim da je i ovih 228 merita odlican rezultat, u prosjeku skoro 1 merit po postu.

Evo i liste svih koji su podijelili te primili merit tijekom proslog mjeseca. Na vrhu posiljatelja je i ovaj put Pmalek sa 63 podijeljena merita dok je na vrhu primatelja katanic sa 47.

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Studenog 2025

I za kraj pregleda, popis svih clanova koji su ostavili makar 1 post na nasem boardu. slackovic je sacuvao svoje 1. mjesto i sad kad je u punoj aktivnosti, tesko ce ga itko svrgnuti sa trona, a daleko iza njega su ovcijisir na 2. te katanic97 na 3. mjestu. Ono sto veseli je povratak Daniel91, koji ce nadam se jos vise aktivirati na nasem boardu.

1. slackovic [50]
2. ovcijisir [32]
3. katanic97 [27]
4. Rikafip [25]
5. Pmalek [24]
6. dkbit98 [15]
7. examplens [14]
8. cryptofrka [13]
9. Trofo [9]
10. Daniel91 [7]
11. CroBoy12 [7]
12. paco92x [7]
13. btcltcdigger [2]
14. EXMON [2]
15. fujn [1]
16. Basil Rusakov [1]
17. powray [1]

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:16:39 AM

It depends on your wallet settings. Click on your account balance on the top of your screen. At the bottom of the drop down menu you will see, "Wallet Settings." Click on that and find the "Display Crypto in Fiat" option. Make sure EUR is ticked. I have set it at USD on my end. The balance will then display in whichever fiat currency you select. I personally find it easier to convert BTC and crypto values to USD instead of other fiat currencies.

Most websites detect your IP address and set the default currency and language based on that information but it's not difficult to customize your account settings a little bit for getting your favorite currency.

If you want to go global, choose US dollar and don't have to do manual conversion of price from USD to your national fiat currency. It takes more time and even can result in inaccuracy in your estimation in mind.

I'd prefer USD like you as it can help me to follow Bitcoin price in USD and compare current price with prices at anytime in the past while with national fiat currency, its inflation and purchasing power can contribute to Bitcoin price in different years.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:02:39 AM

Korisnici bitcoina su krivi što CEX-ovi imaju toliku moć pa sebi dozvoljavaju da kradu od nas a mi im praštamo.

Ima DEX i p2p alternative ali moramo raditi i dosta ''gimnastike'' za preskakanje Bitcoin prepreka.
Sviđalo se to nekom ili ne, sada je očito da Bitcoin zapravo nije fungible'' valuta, i nije svaki Bitcoin istin.
Meni se zato sviđa monero i očekujem da će u budućnosti rasti još više.

Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 06:57:37 AM

Week#58 payment has been processed- 94d086fc2314737d0acd40852c5a80cf8d31bc591a5814d23abd822d3a722ce6

Code:

BlackHatCoiner- old avatar
Pmalek- old avatar
Beparanf- old sig & avatar
Luzin- old sig & avatar
Eternad- old sig & avatar
Patikno- old sig & avatar

Please fix them ASAP.

Signature and Avatar updated. Thank you.

Quote from: Pmalek on December 29, 2025, 08:15:35 AM

On an unrelated note, address poisoning is becoming more and more common. ...

Well, address poisoning scams only work because a lot of people are negligent and possibly don't know how to efficiently check public addresses. I strongly believe that proper address verification should be basic crypto currency 101.

It might be convenient when a wallet offers target address suggestions, but this just aids address poisoning scams. If there were an option to turn this off, I'd do it.

For the record and how I usually check (I don't claim my method is the best or the only one; it simply worked for me all the time):

check a handful of symbols at the start, around the middle and at the end of a public address
(for Bitcoin: don't account public address prefixes like 1..., 3..., bc1q..., bc1p... for your symbol match count)

If your checking for start, ~middle and end areas match, the rest will match, too, because it's practically near impossible to have a different address that matches all three areas, especially when you have a bit of wiggle room in the middle.

My sample space is likely miniscule, but this method never failed me.

For hex string addresses like in Ethereum space, I find it harder to check.

Anyway, for your own safety, do not skip to check all output addresses thoroughly, regardless what crypto currency you use. Make it a habit to really never skip this. It's an easy middle finger to address poisoning scammers.

Quote from: Pmalek on December 27, 2025, 08:26:53 AM

Quote from: Bushdark on December 26, 2025, 05:52:52 PM

Even though most gamblers like you have mentioned don't take their time to check everything they need to know about a casino before they create an account, we don't have to blame these people because this might be as a result of rush so they don't have to miss out on a bet that could make them huge profits. It is not all gamblers that have the patience to register on a casino and at the same time reading through the casino terms to know what it is all about. They know that the casino terms will not have too strict terms that will make things complicated for them.

If you don't read the terms and abide by the rules, it's absolutely your fault if the casino catches you breaking them. Being in rush and wanting to hurry is not an excuse. Thinking that things will go according to plan doesn't always work, and claiming that you didn't know won't save you from the consequences of your actions.

I know that reading T&Cs is a hassle and I don't claim I have done it for every service I have ever used. However, if I mistakenly break those terms, it would be my fault and no one else's.

Some of these casinos terms can have deeper meaning than we can easily assimilate and interpreting most of those writeups can be incomprehensible for most gamblers that are only interested in making quick cash by making use of the bonus offers after making a deposit. The reason why I may not blame gamblers that end up not reading the terms of service of a casino is because they are after the benefit to be gotten from the casino before weighing the obligations of users from accepted regions which they might also be.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 12:19:27 PM

~
Spomenuo si bitcoin. Hajmo uzeti kao primjer da imaš 10 različitih transakcija na istoj adresi. 10 UTXO-a. 9 UTXO-a ti je low-risk, odnosno čisti su. 1 UTXO ti je high-risk ili "prljav/sumnjiv" prema AML analizama. Možda mjenačnica neće reagovati ako im pošalješ neki od tih 9 čistih UTXO-a a ako im pošalješ taj prljavi, ondi bi nastali problemi. A opet ko ti to može garantovati? Svi coini su na istoj adresi. Ti kao osoba imaš prljavi/high-risk BTC kod sebe. Možda ti ga zamrznu bez obzira koji od UTXO-a im pošalješ.
~

Znaci mogao bi se ocistiti BTC sa neke adrese gdje su nabacane razne tranaakcije tako da se izbace coinovi sa rizicnim UTXO?

Ako je to istina mogao bih ocistiti jednu od medium risk adresa tako da izbacim te "prljave" coine. Na svu srecu sam pratio i znam otprilike koje transakcije bi mogle biti oznacen kao rizicne (sredstva sa exch i casina) tako da mi ne bi tebao biti problem odvojiti ih sa coin controlom...

Quote from: Trofo on Today at 06:16:56 PM

I najvažniji dio priče, regulative se mijenjaju. Mene je tog dijela najviše strah jer ono što je danas čisto može jednog dana biti prljavo kada se neki kriterij postroži. A prema svemu sudeći idemo u sve veću i veću regulativu.

A i to je istina, kripto danas nije isti kripto kao i prije 5 godina, regulativa se sve vise steze i postaje stroza, ali na zalost to se moglo i ocekivati cim su instutucije pocele ulaziti u kripto.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 12:19:27 PM

Sig has been updated as per the rebranding and sportsbet addition. Please use the new sig and confirm ASAP.

Feel free to check out the new ANN and leave your feedback- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5519214.0

Code:

BlackHatCoiner
salad daging
BitcoinHunt3r
Zwei
Beparanf
Luzin
Eternad
Patikno
Pmalek

Quote from: noorman0 on Today at 08:56:34 AM

I thought the slider was for zooming the circle, but it turns out it's for displaying other blocks even though I've already manually entered a block.

I half imagined a futuristic display where you can highlight a circle and it rises above the rest with all major details about it shown.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 12:03:32 PM

I had the same thought the first time I inspected the website. A little pop up with transaction information on the right of the block visualizer would have been a neat addition. Who knows, perhaps it will be added in a future update.

I saw in the about page that it was created to aid drawing of Bitcoin blocks as physical artworks, I guess hence the name of thee website. If that's the case, it was never meant to replace a typical block explorer, anyone looking for that information can find it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:58:06 AM

I altovi podliježu istim AML provjerama kao i bitcoin. Njih je čak i lakše zapljeniti ili blokirati na adresama na kojim se nalaze jer su mnogi centralizovani. Na primjer, popularni stablecoini. Državne službe kontaktiraju izdavača, dostave "dokaze" ili potrebnu dokumentaciju i novac ti je blokiran.

Baš sam jučer čitao vijest da je Tether u zadnje dvije godine zaledio preko 3 milijarde USDT-a na Ethereum i Tron mrežama. Za razliku od njih, Circle je zaledio samo preko 100 miliona USDC-a u istom vremenskom periodu. USDC nije toliko popularan kao USDT, ali je ipak velika razlika.

To mi je jasno. Čuo sam puno puta da je Tether nekome zaplijenio, odnosno zamrznuo USDT zato jer je od regulatora ili suda došla odluka. Ali tu se ne radi o tome da su točno ti USDT tokeni porijeklom iz nekog hacka nego je adresa vezana uz hack. Znači oni ne gledaju podrijetlo svakog USDT tokena (kao što se može vidjeti podrijetlo svakog satoshija) nego povežu adresu s hackom i onda prate gdje je USDT završio i temeljem toga zamrznu USDT koji se nalazi na nekoj adresi. Kod Bitcoina je potpuno drugačije - tamo se može pratiti podrijetlo svakog satoshija i prljavim se označava BTC, a ne adresa na kojoj se nalazi. Mene ne muči da mi je Ethereum adresa vezana uz hack tako da sam miran što se toga tiče. Zato sam mislio da bi možda bilo bolje napraviti swap u USDT ili ETH.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:45:29 AM

Quote from: Lakai01 on December 28, 2025, 04:59:21 PM

I only saw a brief summary of the match, and the final score of 2–0 really doesn't do Pisa's performance justice — they hit the woodwork twice and then conceded an own goal. The newly promoted team deserved at least a draw, imo.

Actually, the first goal wasn't an own goal. I was a bit surprised that it was first registered as one. The Pisa defender tried to clear the ball from his goal. In the process he kicked it into the legs of Kalulu. The ball hits Kalulu's legs and deflects off the same defender who tried to clear it before going into goal. It's not an own goal because the ball was going goalwards after it came off Kalulu, and it would have gone towards goal even if it hadn't bounced off the defender.

Thanks for the explanation! Did you watch the game live?

I watched a summary of the game on Kicker.de and also read an article about it. Both the summary and the article mention an own goal.

But you're right, in the official Serie A match summary, the goal is credited directly to Kalulu and not to Calabresi after his failed rescue attempt.

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 28, 2025, 11:34:19 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on December 28, 2025, 07:50:05 AM

Reputable casinos will inform their players if something in the T&Cs changed, especially if the changes affect a larger group of gamblers. But there have also been cases when gambling sites have sneaked in new rules without emphasizing them enough and letting the players know.

Personally, I wouldn’t trust or consider playing/using at a casino/service that introduces changes to its terms (regardless of how insignificant those changes might be) without informing their players/customers in advance. They need to inform them through all their communication channels to ensure they won’t miss the updates.
This is why, on any reputable service, you will see the date when the Terms of Service have been last updated.
Not to mention that changes must have no retroactive effect.

Many people prefer not to read terms and conditions because it takes time to read them.
They want to play but not to read.
And if the terms and conditions changes they do not read about all changes and all new terms.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:50:05 AM

This is something some people/teams find as a challenge. If they can find the root of an mix or coinjoin they will get the plaudits and publicity that goes along with it. Others might want to remain anonymous but want it known if mixers and/or coinjoins can be traced back to the origin therefore want to discover if it really can be achieved.

I am not stating it is impossible, however credibility is essential. Any individual, group or organisation making claims really should provide substantial evidence before announcing anything otherwise they will never be taken seriously.

Quote from: Pmalek on December 27, 2025, 01:55:41 PM

TRM Labs claims to have demixed certain Wasabi and mixer transactions in connection to the stolen crypto from the LastPass hack in 2022. Wallets allegedly drained in 2024 and 2025 were linked by TRM Labs on-chain back to their original clusters. They further claim that they were able to follow the stolen crypto to Russian fiat on/off-ramps even after they went through Wasabi and mixers. It's believed that $28 million was converted to bitcoin and coinjoined through Wasabi in late 2024 and early 2025.

TRM analysts allegedly use certain "demixing techniques" to match deposit to withdrawal clusters. By considering values and timings of on-chain movements, they tie pre-mix bitcoins to post-mix bitcoin and conclude that the same operator controls certain deposits and withdrawals from Wasabi.

Besides the claims by TRM, there is no actual evidence or examples showing that they connected pre-mixed bitcoin to post-mix bitcoin and inputs to outputs. At least not in this blog post.

Source: https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/trm-traces-stolen-crypto-from-2022-lastpass-breach-on-chain-indicators-suggest-russian-cybercriminal-involvement

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:30:09 PM

I originally included the Juventus vs. Pisa game in my multi bet, predicting a Juventus win, but ultimately decided against it and removed the game. That's how wrong you can be!

I only saw a brief summary of the match, and the final score of 2–0 really doesn't do Pisa's performance justice — they hit the woodwork twice and then conceded an own goal. The newly promoted team deserved at least a draw, imo.

Nevertheless, congratulations on winning your bet!

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:50:05 AM

Quote from: Cryptozaika on December 27, 2025, 03:51:37 PM

It also necessary to remember that terms and conditions can change any time and gamblers must follow new terms and conditions of casino.

Correct. But I think the number of people who re-read the Terms & Conditions from time to time is very small. Considering that the number of people who read the terms even once is little, you can imagine how few people spend time reading new changes. Reputable casinos will inform their players if something in the T&Cs changed, especially if the changes affect a larger group of gamblers. But there have also been cases when gambling sites have sneaked in new rules without emphasizing them enough and letting the players know.

Very often people even do not know that the terms and conditions has changed or do not pay attention to the changing conditions. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Pmalek on December 26, 2025, 04:32:51 PM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on December 26, 2025, 02:06:35 PM

OK, here's my SafePal X1. It arrived a few days ago, and I opened it today.

I will add your SafePal X1 to the collection in OP. You are the first user who has reported that they own this particular model. ajiz138 confirmed having a SafePal S1 earlier.
Looks like a calculator. After you have used it a bit, you can write some feedback in the Safepal hardware wallet review and opinions thread.

👍

Quote

Quote from: Wind_FURY on December 26, 2025, 02:06:35 PM

- The hardware wallet was detached from the box. Is this OK? 👀

I don't know if you are joking or if that was a serious question. Tongue

It probably got detached during shipping and handling by the personnel who sent it from A to B, etc.

I was joking. The box was sealed and packed very well.

Quote

I see there is a USB cable. Safepal claims to be airgapped. Is the cable there for firmware installation only or do you need to have the device connection to the PC at all times during use? I have never taken a closer look at Safepal devices.

There's no need to connect to your PC with the USB cable. Everything done through BlueTooth. The USB cable is used merely for charging the device.

* Rainbet reserves the right to disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to my discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love football

Code:

mv1986
Zwei
xLays
Koal-84
Harkorede
CLS63
dzonikg28
notblox1
Pmalek
el che
Charles-Tim
famososMuertos
ovcijisir
jayce
Rikafip
xandry
hilariousandco
Betwrong
goodpunt
mole0815
KTChampions
VashaUdacha777
Ryu_Ar1
buwaytress
darbitmobilerecovery
holydarkness
Slissy
bangjoe
Dump3er
ajanwalker
B1g4udge
Jinetics1111
aoluain
crwth
LFC_Bitcoin
tiCeR
ILuckyGuyI
slaman29
JSRAW
hosemary
mitchr4
Trofo
klarki
Strongkored
rohang
Smartprofit
arallmuus

* Rainbet reserves the right to disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to my discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love football

Code:

Quote from: Pmalek on December 27, 2025, 01:55:41 PM

By considering values and timings of on-chain movements, they tie pre-mix bitcoins to post-mix bitcoin and conclude that the same operator controls certain deposits and withdrawals from Wasabi.

What does "By considering values and timings of on-chain movements" mean? Imagine you're monitoring Wasabi coinjoin liquidity and notice that a substantial amount of money enters the system, significantly increasing available liquidity. For example, let's say 600 BTC flows in. You then observe that total system liquidity stabilizes at this higher level—indicating the entity that deposited is still actively coinjoining. At this point, you can no longer track the funds, but you know the entity remains in the mixing process.

Then, you notice liquidity drops sharply—say, by 300 BTC. You decide to trace the outgoing funds and discover either a large consolidation of tens or hundreds of bitcoins, or multiple deposits flowing to the same exchange. Shortly after, liquidity drops again. Following the exiting funds once more, you find additional consolidations or more deposits to that same exchange.

Here's the critical question: what are the odds that 600 BTC entered the system and 600 BTC exited—only to end up at the exact same exchange?

This is why a whale can never hide among small fishes. This is why big consolidating lots of coins is a bad idea, especially for whales and this is why using Wasabi as a mixer is a bad idea.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 01:55:41 PM

TRM analysts allegedly use certain "demixing techniques" to match deposit to withdrawal clusters. By considering values and timings of on-chain movements, they tie pre-mix bitcoins to post-mix bitcoin and conclude that the same operator controls certain deposits and withdrawals from Wasabi.

Demixing is a somewhat misleading term because they have not broken the obfuscation algorithm to know with 100% certainty which outputs came from which specific inputs. Using Wasabi in and of itself isn’t enough to deanonymize a user. What they can analyze are behavior patterns. If you are trying to launder millions of dollars, you are still going to stick out like a sore thumb if you are sending large amounts of coinjoined BTC in a systematic, identifiable manner to 1 or 2 centralized destinations. With enough educated guesswork, you can eventually piece together enough information, with clues left by the hackers, to say ‘this is the most plausible culprit’.

Quote from: Cryptozaika on Today at 03:51:37 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:26:53 AM

It also necessary to remember that terms and conditions can change any time and gamblers must follow new terms and conditions of casino.

If terms and conditions changes, casinos make effort to inform their users of such changes. They do their in the form of popups which is something users will see the moment they log into their accounts. This way, no one will feign ignorance of such changes because everyone is aware and either accept it or chose to do otherwise.

Time has come for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, this time a little bit later than in previous months. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet.

Post activity per local board during November 2025

After the last month's increase this time we have a drop of activity; from October's 14463 posts we dropped down to 13826 posts in November. Majority of this drop happened due decreased activity in two of the most active boards, Nigerian and Russian. Drop is not huge, therefore not concerning and I am confident that it was just a little bit weaker month.

Active members per local board during November 2025

During the last month, 1445 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards that are part of this overview, which is almost exactly the same as in October (1446). To be honest, I expected bigger drop than that considering the drop of the number of posts, but I guess people just wrote less, nothing else.

No changes at the top; Nigerian board far ahead the other, and Russia behind on the 2nd, after many years of dominating this, and majority of the other charts.

Local board members per amount of posts during November 2025

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during November, leader is Polish local board with 58%, while at the same time Pilipinas board had only 12% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French board with 67%, while Arabic board had the lowest percentage, only 25%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Portuguese and Pilipinas share the first spot, each having 53% of such members, while Romanian board had no members who wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during November 2025

During November, 7414 merit was shared across local board, which is a big drop compared to October's 8427 merit. The main cause of this major drop can be found in Nigerian board, whose number of merit shared went from 2241 to 1565. Other boards contributed to this drop as well, but majority of this is decreased happened there. Drop would be much bigger if German board didn't have a big increase in the same period.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during November 2025

In November, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.54, which is an expected decrease compared to October's 0.56 and is continuation of the trend for several months now.

After losing the first spot for a couple of months, German local board is back at the top with a very high 1.66 ratio, but few others like Spanish, Italian, Arabic and Italian also have over 1+ merit per post which is an excellent ratio.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during November 2025

During November, 536 members sent while 610 received merit, which is an expected drop compared to October (654 senders and 685 receivers) due fewer merit shared.

Merit per transaction across local boards during November 2025

And for the end, the chart that shows us merit habits of each board. Arabic remained at the top, while German local board is not that far behind with also a very high merit per tx ratio, which is not surprise given their high merit per post ratio.

The most active members per local board during November 2025

Last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. This time the most active member was Julien_Olynpic from Russian local with 137 posts, close 2nd was joker_josue from Portuguese localwho wrote 135 posts while 3rd was the most active member of Turkish board, mandown, who wrote 127 posts. Keep it up guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Julien_Olynpic [137]	\|	1. MaxMueller [72]	\|	1. mandown [127]	\|	1. Plutosky [68]	\|	1. joker_josue [135]	\|	1. darxiaomi [39]	\|
2. klarki [116]	\|	2. mole0815 [71]	\|	2. Phoenix Anka [61]	\|	2. gbianchi [47]	\|	2. sabotag3x [73]	\|	2. famososMuertos [29]	\|
3. zasad@ [56]	\|	3. Unknown01 [57]	\|	3. Mustang Shelby [60]	\|	3. arulbero [45]	\|	3. bitmover [53]	\|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	\|
4. Alex077 [55]	\|	4. willi9974 [55]	\|	4. blomen [60]	\|	4. Ace [41]	\|	4. alegotardo [42]	\|	4. danadc [28]	\|
5. eisen33 [44]	\|	5. MinoRaiola [50]	\|	5. Hvdv [58]	\|	5. fillippone [39]	\|	5. Forsyth Jones [38]	\|	5. Porfirii [26]	\|
6. Numeral [43]	\|	6. cygan [47]	\|	6. xzone [57]	\|	6. Lillominato89 [28]	\|	6. TryNinja [34]	\|	6. Hispo [15]	\|
7. KTChampions [40]	\|	7. Koal-84 [37]	\|	7. kriminall [56]	\|	7. babo [26]	\|	7. mikel_012 [25]	\|	7. Crystal-Trade.org [13]	\|
8. PerfectumR [39]	\|	8. 5tift [35]	\|	8. yenerbatmaz [48]	\|	8. Italian Panic [25]	\|	8. rdluffy [21]	\|	8. sausalitox [8]	\|
9. xandry [37]	\|	9. Lakai01 [31]	\|	9. ingiltere [44]	\|	9. Ale88 [24]	\|	9. davipinheiro [20]	\|	9. Filicius [6]	\|
10. Unsoldier [36]	\|	10. x3t9fi [28]	\|	10. ZekiBeyy [43]	\|	10. Paolo.Demidov [19]	\|	10. velhoti [19]	\|	10. darbitmobilerecovery [5]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. AakZaki [33]	\|	1. patrickus [11]	\|	1. blockman [55]	\|	1. slackovic [50]	\|	1. Jubilee58 [81]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [32]	\|
2. MAAManda [31]	\|	2. Danydee [8]	\|	2. gunhell16 [52]	\|	2. ovcijisir [32]	\|	2. Floxynice [71]	\|	2. yhiaali3 [27]	\|
3. traderethereum [30]	\|	3. Saint-loup [4]	\|	3. tech30338 [52]	\|	3. katanic97 [27]	\|	3. Charles-Tim [63]	\|	3. khaled0111 [24]	\|
4. Maaop7 [26]	\|	4. GrosWesh [4]	\|	4. cryptoaddictchie [40]	\|	4. Rikafip [25]	\|	4. PremiumcryptoHub [59]	\|	4. GxSTxV [11]	\|
5. FunshareNesialMLMPenipu [24]	\|	5. winspiral [3]	\|	5. arwin100 [31]	\|	5. Pmalek [24]	\|	5. Africolo [58]	\|	5. Ochan_yazo_tochant [7]	\|
6. blue Snow [22]	\|	6. TryNinja [3]	\|	6. finaleshot2016 [29]	\|	6. dkbit98 [15]	\|	6. Agbe [40]	\|	6. hugeblack [4]	\|
7. Luzin [21]	\|	7. Halab [3]	\|	7. julerz12 [27]	\|	7. examplens [14]	\|	7. ArabBTC [39]	\|	7. RedFlix [4]	\|
8. Gaza13 [21]	\|	8. G.Seed [3]	\|	8. GreatArkansas [24]	\|	8. cryptofrka [13]	\|	8. SatoPrincess [37]	\|	8. 0x000369 [3]	\|
9. taufik123 [20]	\|	9. estenity [2]	\|	9. lionheart78 [22]	\|	9. Trofo [9]	\|	9. Agbamoni [36]	\|	9. Danydee [1]	\|
10. joniboini [20]	\|	10. EXMON [2]	\|	10. Questat [22]	\|	10. Daniel91 [7]	\|	10. Yablee0 [35]	\|	10. OmegaStarScream [1]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [10]	\|	1. Bitcoin Smith [28]	\|	1. cryptosize [30]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [7]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [74]	\|	1. Bd officer [22]	\|
2. pawel7777 [6]	\|	2. JSRAW [22]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [12]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	\|	2. Jaweria parveen [47]	\|	2. DYING_S0UL [16]	\|
3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. TSen [16]	\|	3. alani123 [4]	\|	3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. JunaidAzizi [41]	\|	3. Z_MBFM [14]	\|
4. EXMON [2]	\|	4. pawanjain [15]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [3]	\|	4. othell_rogue [1]	\|	4. MusaPk [27]	\|	4. Crypto Library [13]	\|
5. dominik_crypto [2]	\|	5. LucyFurr [15]	\|	5. Dimitris [1]	\|	5. fujn [1]	\|	5. Cheema02 [25]	\|	5. Review Master [13]	\|
6. Judicar [1]	\|	6. henmark [10]	\|	6. fujn [1]	\|	6. 0vi [1]	\|	6. ZAINmalik75 [20]	\|	6. God Of Thunder [12]	\|
7. fujn [1]	\|	7. TheUltraElite [9]	\|		\|	7. powray [1]	\|	7. Compromise me [19]	\|	7. Momin_Official [10]	\|
8. konopaki12 [1]	\|	8. so98nn [6]	\|		\|		\|	8. AgriTrack [18]	\|	8. BlackHatSojib [8]	\|
9. naglafar [1]	\|	9. Cointikka [5]	\|		\|		\|	9. BTC FutureKing [18]	\|	9. Btcloop [8]	\|
10. winqoo [1]	\|	10. M47AK16 [5]	\|		\|		\|	10. Doll2233 [18]	\|	10. Mahiyammahi [5]	\|

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:26:53 AM

It also necessary to remember that terms and conditions can change any time and gamblers must follow new terms and conditions of casino.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 01:55:41 PM

Besides the claims by TRM, there is no actual evidence or examples showing that they connected pre-mixed bitcoin to post-mix bitcoin and inputs to outputs. At least not in this blog post.

Without actual evidence, their claims must be taken with a grain of salt, because WabiSabi coinjoins can be of variable sizes AFAIK depending on the server configuration.

Update:
DT 1
1. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1724 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10044 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 3280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (3) 8992 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1888 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (10) 6346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1852 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 12625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 6533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6521 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 3269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9348 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +138 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3508 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11100 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11258 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 525 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4500 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 4204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (57) 19708 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2917 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1331 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1002 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3581 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +53 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6502 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +78 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 11079 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1318 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2188 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1986 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9031 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3139 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7189 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (7) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3687 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3182 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2414 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 5262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5221 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1489 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +41 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 3273 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1051 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 815 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1103 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7492 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3008 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8182 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (13807 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9257 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Weekly update (2025-12-19_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1766112631 2 5489893.msg66189546 1166480 958449
1766112612 3 5568630.msg66182755 379147 11425
1766110694 1 5522234.msg66190466 252510 3446246
1766110659 1 5522234.msg66187211 252510 3587685
1766110153 1 5568838.msg66188340 839568 33156
1766108374 1 5568871.msg66189836 33156 1349691
1766107289 1 5568838.msg66188340 3719408 33156
1766106442 1 5173493.msg66157234 1554927 846936
1766105529 1 178336.msg66190739 223922 67210
1766105458 1 178336.msg66189709 33156 198573
1766105020 1 178336.msg66190696 198573 252510
1766104686 1 5526798.msg64964344 3449242 2830659
1766104128 1 178336.msg66189473 223922 33156
1766103996 50 5143324.msg51070466 18321 15728
1766102349 1 5568262.msg66190542 1045971 317618
1766102023 2 5568657.msg66190363 1856852 1265260
1766101588 2 5489893.msg66150564 407174 382413
1766101282 1 5568613.msg66187131 1856852 1130307
1766101131 1 5456516.msg66188701 317618 3674660
1766100502 5 5568838.msg66188340 317618 33156
1766100323 1 178336.msg66190469 3547723 64507
1766100171 3 5568630.msg66182755 137773 11425
1766100142 1 5568630.msg66182755 137773 11425
1766099749 1 5132720.msg66190234 252510 3613441
1766099621 2 5568866.msg66189642 3322606 355846
1766099468 1 5568884.msg66190263 3547723 3704391
1766099269 1 5567984.msg66167702 3322558 3489395
1766098830 1 5568262.msg66179357 317618 459836
1766098753 1 5568885.msg66190454 3558380 3322606
1766098751 1 5132720.msg66189494 252510 3724979
1766098638 1 5568788.msg66187545 407174 2724574
1766098378 5 5548042.msg66115136 85033 3579677
1766098376 1 232519.msg66186624 2905746 3720043
1766097482 2 5444001.msg61881248 317618 1982152
1766097450 1 5444001.msg61879660 317618 1190631
1766097337 3 5444001.msg61877332 317618 2789068
1766097094 1 5568704.msg66184887 1410401 112493
1766097078 1 5568747.msg66189444 33156 317618
1766097049 1 5568747.msg66189039 33156 1269497
1766096912 3 5273824.msg66173638 1852120 557798
1766096210 2 781352.msg66188326 317618 71280
1766095914 1 178336.msg66188957 198573 1027389
1766095603 1 5561446.msg66186611 3704398 881377
1766095300 1 5568744.msg66186617 1410401 3719408
1766095259 1 5568787.msg66190034 839568 379487
1766095243 1 5568744.msg66186225 1410401 839568
1766095228 1 5568749.msg66190066 33156 1410401
1766095187 4 5568749.msg66189897 33156 3491360
1766095083 2 5548762.msg65550435 3730852 3570987
1766094663 1 5568838.msg66188340 2755547 33156
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (53 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2972 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:50:31 AM CET, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 2 Merit to viljy (history) for Re: [***] Создаём экосистему токена Chamby .
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:50:12 AM CET, pooya87 (history) sent 3 Merit to gmaxwell (history) for Re: Bitcoin Testnet Needed: Prefer USA based Miners.
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:18:14 AM CET, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to moneystery (history) for Re: Everything you wanted to know about Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:17:39 AM CET, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Just Say (history) for Re: Everything you wanted to know about Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:09:13 AM CET, AakZaki (history) sent 1 Merit to vapourminer (history) for bring back the glowing ignore button.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (566 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8182 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 828 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3739640: darkrangerat (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3739781: BigNoteh (history) earned: 4 Merit.
3739792: Wildead Casino (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3740057: Becassinewantstocomeback (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3740085: Taurox (history) earned: 4 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3736690: bxae00
3736722: Stilelibero
3736790: James tector
3736915: mrust_fridge
3736986: Showstopper1111
3737025: hmbdofficial
3737029: realmeh
3737125: FlyingDevilBB
3737150: ahmadhere
3737270: SawyerNolan
3737311: CONVOAI
3737401: Alge89
3737459: Akaenyi
3737471: LogosLRB
3737474: axcelvoid
3737623: DRY MARTINI
3737741: PlayRadar
3737767: krvbs
3737790: fabrice.btc
3737800: adilx157
3737826: BTC_Bae
3737986: KawasakiNinja_
3738006: FeWoWHV24
3738068: Coinjoiner21
3738090: rreplayworld
3738152: Fresh_Milk
3738205: xXHenneBXx
3738277: TheNextBigThinger0x0
3738491: meangoat
3738543: InvestigatingWOZX
3738697: art3m1s_37
3738700: KawasakiNinja1_
3738840: Rah12345
3738956: boombitty
3739036: Unixx
3739052: AmlRiskMonitor
3739109: Bjoern90
3739255: Amzender
3739266: NyktersteinMD
3739326: Raisero
3739388: Vanellp
3739483: JaredIbrahim
3739490: Blour
3739617: Chononaut
3739632: Sheylon
3739640: darkrangerat
3739781: BigNoteh
3739792: Wildead Casino
3740057: Becassinewantstocomeback
3740085: Taurox

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8182
4:0:828
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:723
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14216:13807
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:300
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1412
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3736690:2:29
3736722:0:1
3736790:0:13
3736915:0:1
3736986:0:8
3737025:0:2
3737029:0:26
3737125:0:1
3737150:0:1
3737270:0:1
3737311:0:3
3737401:0:1
3737459:0:3
3737471:0:2
3737474:0:22
3737623:0:5
3737741:0:1
3737767:0:2
3737790:1:7
3737800:0:4
3737826:0:3
3737986:0:1
3738006:0:1
3738068:2:8
3738090:0:2
3738152:0:1
3738205:0:8
3738277:0:1
3738491:0:1
3738543:0:1
3738697:5:12
3738700:0:1
3738840:0:6
3738956:0:1
3739036:2:5
3739052:0:3
3739109:0:2
3739255:0:1
3739266:0:1
3739326:0:1
3739388:1:5
3739483:0:10
3739490:0:2
3739617:0:1
3739632:0:1
3739640:0:1
3739781:0:4
3739792:0:1
3740057:1:2
3740085:0:4

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50748
Sample

Code:

1. 19708 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1086 unique users in 11300 transactions
2. 19547 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 733 unique users in 10680 transactions
3. 18879 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9979 transactions
4. 14944 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8621 transactions
5. 13807 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1213 unique users in 4943 transactions
6. 12625 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 693 unique users in 8427 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11258 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 483 unique users in 6302 transactions
9. 11227 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 649 unique users in 6428 transactions
10. 11100 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 594 unique users in 6462 transactions
11. 11079 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 558 unique users in 4345 transactions
12. 10508 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 497 unique users in 5516 transactions
13. 10044 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 568 unique users in 5718 transactions
14. 9596 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 328 unique users in 4921 transactions
15. 9348 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 625 unique users in 5038 transactions
16. 9257 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 334 unique users in 3294 transactions
17. 9167 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 511 unique users in 4275 transactions
18. 9149 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 448 unique users in 4556 transactions
19. 9031 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 384 unique users in 3197 transactions
20. 8992 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 420 unique users in 4877 transactions
21. 8944 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 531 unique users in 4050 transactions
22. 8465 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 525 unique users in 4575 transactions
23. 8461 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4832 transactions
24. 8395 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 450 unique users in 4978 transactions
25. 8353 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 565 unique users in 4895 transactions
26. 8182 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 404 unique users in 882 transactions
27. 8110 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 394 unique users in 4243 transactions
28. 7522 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4110 transactions
29. 7492 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 450 unique users in 4157 transactions
30. 7189 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 571 unique users in 4261 transactions
31. 7122 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 401 unique users in 3634 transactions
32. 6639 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 226 unique users in 1710 transactions
33. 6533 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 273 unique users in 2959 transactions
34. 6521 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 367 unique users in 3279 transactions
35. 6502 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 379 unique users in 3538 transactions
36. 6353 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 923 unique users in 4118 transactions
37. 6346 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 473 unique users in 3527 transactions
38. 6201 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 618 unique users in 3468 transactions
39. 6195 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 196 unique users in 3592 transactions
40. 6118 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 218 unique users in 3579 transactions
41. 6112 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 407 unique users in 3549 transactions
42. 6012 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2628 transactions
43. 5989 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 518 unique users in 3480 transactions
44. 5969 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 405 unique users in 3253 transactions
45. 5965 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 450 unique users in 3347 transactions
46. 5965 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 225 unique users in 3378 transactions
47. 5952 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 324 unique users in 2766 transactions
48. 5642 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 201 unique users in 3246 transactions
49. 5350 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 412 unique users in 2626 transactions
50. 5262 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 440 unique users in 3745 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50699. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50700. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50701. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50702. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50703. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50704. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50705. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50706. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50707. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50708. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50709. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50710. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50711. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50712. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50713. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50714. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50715. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50716. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50717. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50718. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50719. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50720. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50721. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50722. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50723. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50724. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50725. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50726. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50727. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50728. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50729. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50730. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50731. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50732. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50733. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50734. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50735. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50736. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50737. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50738. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50739. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50740. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50741. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50742. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50743. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50744. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50745. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50746. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50747. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50748. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26475
Sample

Code:

1. 69531 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 884 unique users in 12371 transactions
2. 65700 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2128 unique users in 28390 transactions
3. 64670 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3298 unique users in 17324 transactions
4. 56608 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4531 unique users in 32571 transactions
5. 56526 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3526 unique users in 54354 transactions
6. 46893 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3598 unique users in 32574 transactions
7. 42852 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2790 unique users in 15088 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 36875 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2490 unique users in 13682 transactions
10. 36696 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2817 unique users in 29717 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 33312 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1567 unique users in 13617 transactions
13. 31368 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1439 unique users in 10172 transactions
14. 28208 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2059 unique users in 10153 transactions
15. 27434 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1667 unique users in 6519 transactions
16. 27117 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1382 unique users in 6953 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 22068 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1337 unique users in 9277 transactions
21. 21322 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6403 transactions
22. 15915 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1925 unique users in 6452 transactions
23. 15592 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 731 unique users in 5740 transactions
24. 15419 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1697 unique users in 7176 transactions
25. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
26. 14848 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1642 unique users in 3733 transactions
27. 14549 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1145 unique users in 8757 transactions
28. 14387 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 528 unique users in 6729 transactions
29. 14216 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1101 unique users in 1741 transactions
30. 13989 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1275 unique users in 7970 transactions
31. 13502 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1586 unique users in 6895 transactions
32. 12970 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 654 unique users in 3563 transactions
33. 12728 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1321 unique users in 7179 transactions
34. 12652 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1301 unique users in 5797 transactions
35. 12618 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2927 unique users in 6710 transactions
36. 12552 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1109 unique users in 7623 transactions
37. 12516 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 815 unique users in 4163 transactions
38. 12280 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 802 unique users in 5881 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 10590 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1123 unique users in 5952 transactions
41. 10361 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 540 unique users in 3936 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8033 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3286 transactions
45. 8007 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1019 unique users in 3469 transactions
46. 7772 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 739 unique users in 6915 transactions
47. 7704 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 927 unique users in 3392 transactions
48. 7484 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 566 unique users in 6628 transactions
49. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
50. 6896 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 484 unique users in 5415 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26426. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26427. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26428. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26429. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26430. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26431. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26432. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26433. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26434. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26435. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26436. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26437. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26438. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26439. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26440. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26441. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26442. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26443. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26444. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26445. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26446. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26447. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26448. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26449. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26450. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26451. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26452. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26453. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26454. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26455. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26456. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26457. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26458. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26459. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26460. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26461. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26462. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26463. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26464. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26465. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26466. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26467. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26468. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26469. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26470. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26471. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26472. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26473. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26474. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26475. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 317431 (14.35%)
Tuesday 315615 (14.27%)
Wednesday 316688 (14.32%)
Thursday 337591 (15.27%)
Friday 335678 (15.18%)
Saturday 292385 (13.22%)
Sunday 295295 (13.35%)
Total: 2210683

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: Pmalek on December 26, 2025, 01:03:40 PM

What does the free IPTV service have to do with your website and the products you advertise and sell there?

Most likely you would use this IPTV service if you use our products.

Code:

Hero of Good: Suchmoon, Mitchell

I was going to mention Condoras first, but I see his account was online a week ago, although it is marked as "memorial". So I decided to mention those who are still with us and share a line that inspired me ... Leadership is the ability to inspire others without even trying (and some statements about what it truly means to be an informal leader). A phrase that, in this chaotic, rapidly changing world, compels me to look closely and seek stability and steadfastness in those around me. These are precisely the qualities I see in Suchmoon and Mitchell ... users who know they don't need to prove anything to anyone. I must admit, I even read a few literary passages to understand whether my subconscious really gives these words the meaning that I am trying to describe, so don’t judge if our views differ)

Code:

Forum Ninja: ChartBuddy

27,000 posts were published in the last week ... crazy.

Besides the spammers from Stake, the top poster list actually includes some good, high-quality posters that deserve attention, as well as the Swiss Guard. But I'd like to mention the person behind the Wall Observer bot, ChartBuddy. Who are you, dude? You really are a forum ninja.

Code:

Bitcoin Geek: mocacinno, willi9974

Without a doubt, mocacinno is a top geek for me. Every thread he writes is steeped in knowledge. And his thread from five years ago is still in my bookmarks. His thread from five years ago is still in my bookmarks, and I refer to it every time I communicate with my clients. I also admire willi9974, a truly cool representative of the German-speaking section and a true Bitcoiner who oversees Groupbuy Solo Mining, a Bitcoin party that collectively mined 193 BTC over 10 years. By the way, you can join if you want ... Blockparty 2025 Number 2 (which I joined a week ago) is currently active.

Code:

Best Event: Epochtalk

Distancing/ceasing Epochtalk development is a truly significant event, as it would have been too painful for me to part with the familiar interface if the migration to Epochtalk had taken place. But now you know that I'll probably be running BCA again and again.

Also, the financial burden... Of course, looking at it through the lens of 10 years of funding, $6 million seems reasonable, but I still think it's a colossal expense.

There's something else I wanted to discuss... a thread started by gmaxwell: Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?

I'm not a financier, and there are probably users like fillippone and JayJuanGee who are much more knowledgeable about Bitcoin funds. But I thought that perhaps the forum's capital, which is over 1000 bitcoins, could be managed in such a way that users would receive dividends (perhaps combining dividends with a merit system). Or, based on the profits, we could create conditions for sustainable forum growth ... I think we can find a solution if we consider all possible options together.

What I'm getting at is that the Russian-language section has become empty, just like other sections... users who've been here for years are leaving, and those who've been here from the start aren't getting any younger. We need a solution to attract truly high-quality posters. The forum ecosystem is quite fragile, and signature campaigns won't keep the forum active forever ... after all, I don't want to launch the Casino Community Awards in five years.

Code:

Best Project: BitList

Voting is subjective, right? So, I'll give my vote to BitList, a project TryNinja and I started and intend to further develop as a brand. Compared to other sites, it might seem like a hobby project, but thanks to our inexhaustible enthusiasm, you'll change your mind in just a year. BitList already includes a Bitcointalk Archive, Bitcoin site lists, forum notifiers, a PGP checker for mixers and exchanges, and a tool that helps prevent fraud (btw, I'd like to thank NotATether, as friendly competition helps us grow). A currency converter has been added to the toolkit, and there are big plans to expand its functionality. I won't go into details yet, but we're always happy to see you in the discussion thread and eagerly read your suggestions.

Code:

Discovery of the Year: RebelMoney

I really like Bitcoin art, so I'm voting for RebelMoney.

He's a user who's only recently become active and is already making significant strides. Take the time to check out his Bitcoin vision/culture.

Quote from: RebelMoney on December 16, 2025, 01:49:34 PM

Code:

Help Buster: Lafu, AakZaki

Without a doubt, AakZaki will be the one to replace nutildah if he wants to take a vacation.

But Lafu deserves to win the nomination more than anyone else: Report Malware and Suspicious Links here so Mods can take Action!

Code:

Craft Master: PowerGlove, Inspace, TryNinja

PowerGlove clearly deserves a nomination for the forum patches he rolled out and for his help with this and other events I managed with GazetaBitcoin. TryNinja is a jack of all trades... there are those who are passionate, but there are also truly talented users in their field who not only understand your vision but can also implement it. Inspace has been a wonderful assistant for over a year, understanding you instantly. This user not only saves me a lot of time each week, but over the past year has become a benchmark for managing various weekly events.

Code:

Local Hero: Pmalek, examplens, dkbit98

In my opinion, the largest concentration of famous names and high-quality posters is in the Croatian section (if we talk about the ratio of activity with other sections), but let's focus on those for whom, as it seems to me, I have not voted yet. Each of these guys is unique in their own way and has a strong point of view, the echoes of which extend far beyond the local section. So, as GB said, the three of you won an Oscar in the same category!

Code:

Miss Bitcointalk: Foxpup, Etranger, SatoPrincess

A gang of sexual perverts has captured the Fox Queen's full attention, so apparently she's unaware of my unrequited love. I sense someone among her subjects who disrupted last year's elections. Otherwise, how can she explain that all this year she's been doing nothing but watching the throne room?

Original Topic: What are Address Poisoning Scams?
Author: Pmalek

Plenti of una don already hear, and some don even experience address poisoning scams. Nah relatively new type of scamming scheme, wey don become popular for di last 30-40 days. E dey appear for blockchains wey get cheap transaction fees, wey dey allow di scammers to send many low-cost transactions. I neva read about cases wey dis affect di Bitcoin network, but e still worth knowing about just in case you come experience am for your BTC wallet in di future. Hardware wallet manufacturers, like Ledger don report say scammers dey target their users as well. So, stay alert.

Wetin be Address Poisoning, and How e dey Work?

Dis scam dey work by sending potential victims small (near-zero) crypto transactions. You go see a new entry for your transaction history wen dat one happen. Di address wey dey send di coins/tokens go look similar to your own. Di first and last two to four characters go dey identical.

Di scammer wan make you think say nah your own address. So, you go copy am from your transaction history wen you dey send coins to yourself or give am to a different party to pay you. In dat case, the funds go dey transferred to di scammer and not to you.

For which Blockchains Address Poisoning dey Common?

Users of di following blockchain networks don already experience address poisoning in one way or di other:

1.   Tron
2.   Binance Smart Chain
3.   Polygon
4.   Ethereum
5.   Maybe others

Safety Measures and Wetin to do Next

If you be victim of address poisoning, dem no get any reasons to panic. Nobody dey target you personally. Scammers victims nah those who dey make frequent transactions and move big sums of money.

Your coins no dey at risk. Your private keys/seed no dey leaked, and nobody don get control of your addresses, no matter di transaction history. Them no get protection against dis address poisoning, by himself , because you no go fit restrict someone from sending you crypto. E dey safe to use those coins as well.

Dem get small things wey you suppose always do to stay safe when sending and receiving crypto:

•   Neva copy addresses from your wallet's transaction history.
•   Neva copy addresses from a blockchain explorer.
•   Always dey generate or copy addresses from your wallet's receive or addresses tab.
•   Wen sending coins elsewhere, copy di address from di source/destination.
•   If you dey transfer crypto to a different person, ask di other party for di correct address.
•   Verify di full address, not just di first and last couple of characters.
•   If you dey use a hardware wallet, ensure say di address in your software dey match with di one wey dey show on your device's screen.
•   Dey prepared to double and triple-check if needed because cryptocurrency transactions dey irreversible. So, once your money is gone, e don lost forever. As can be seen, e dey better to spend an extra minute checking wetin you dey do than to regret say you no do am.

For more information about address poisoning scams, take a look at these sources:

Beware Of Address Poisoning Scams
Address Poisoning Attack, A Continuing Threat
SlowMist: Another Airdrop Scam, but with a twist

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 12:57:57 PM

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 09:21:09 AM

Ako želiš koristiti instant swap mjenačnicu a pogotovo no-KYC burzu onda i moraš bit spreman da platiš više u naknadama. To je jednostavno tako. Naknade od 0.5% do 1% su sasvim ok. Neke usluge naplaćuju i više. Npr, nije neobično da se za kupovinu monera plaća do 5% iznad tržišne cijene da bi sačuvao svoju anonimnost.

Kada sam radio ovaj swap, gde sam izmedju ostalih koristio Swapuz i Exolix (njih sam spomenuo jer su mi oni direktno radili AML proveru), nisam previse obracao paznju na to koliko su deklarativno napisali da je njihov fee. Na primer, moze menjacnica da kaze kako ima 0.001% fee, ali pri tom za 1 BTC mozes dobiti $69k.
Isao sam po sistemu istovremenog poredjenja koliko bih dobio na najpromentnijoj Binance menjacnici i koliko za isti iznos dobijam kroz swap na nekoj od instant menjacnica. Swapuz i Exolix jesu imali priblizno dobar rate, kada na to dodas withdrawal fee kod klasicnih CEX koji Pmalek spominje, sasvim je prihvatljivo za iznose koje sam radio. Do $1000.
Kasnije su se pojavili i jos neki no-kyc favoriti poput splash.tf, changeum.io koji su imali najpriblizniji kurs prema trenutnom stanju na trzistu, da ne kazem gotovo identican. Obe menjacnice su pristune na forumu, splash.tf cak ima i nesto sredstava u escrow, pa je to opet davalo kakvu takvu sigurnost. I kod njih uradio nekoliko transakcija, bez vecih problema. Cak sam jednom zapeo kod Splash, sto je ispostavilo se bio bug, ali vrlo brzo su to resili.

Nadam se da ne treba da napominjem da ovo nije moja garancija za gore pomenute, svakako treba uvek proveriti, samo prenosim licno iskustvo.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:00:37 AM

Osim Swapuz mjenačnice, examplens je spomenuo i Exolix, ali ja je namjerno nisam naveo. To je ona burza koja je korisniku poslala kripto koji je potekao iz neke krađe/hacka a navodno vrše sve potrebne AML i SoF provjere.

I Swapuz je centralizovana mjenačnica. Da ne misliš da je ona neki izuzetak ili da je decentralizovana. Instant mjenačnica ali ipak CEX. Ako se odlučiš da mijenjaš preko njih, to će onda bit zanimljiv test da vidimo šta kaže njihova korisnička služba i koliko su spremni da izađu korisnicima u susret koji ih zamole da im provjere adrese.

Nije mi problem koristiti centraliziranu mjenjačnicu sve dok ne traže KYC. Probao sam Swapuz ali nekako mi se čini dosta skup. Naknada za swap je 0.8%. Znam da su instant swap mjenjačnice skuplje od klasičnih CEX-ova, ali ovo je baš puno skuplje. Na klasičnom CEX-u je fee oko 0.01%.

Ipak, provjerio sam informaciju da ih se kontaktira za provjeru adrese. Poslao sam im poruku preko Telegrama (ima link na webu) i čovjek mi se javi nakon nekoliko minuta. Rekao sam da koristim istu Bitcoin adresu već nekoliko godina, da želim BTC zamijeniti za ETH ali zbog privatnosti ne želim raditi KYC, te da me zanima mogu li kod njih bez problema napraviti swap. Poslao sam mu Bitcoin adresu, provjerio je i za par minuta mi javio da nema nikakvih problema. Sad je jedino problem velikog fee-a koji naplaćuju za swap.

Baš ću isto probati napraviti s Blofin mjenjačnicom. Poslat ću im isti upit.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:54:00 PM

Quote from: Mustang Shelby on Today at 01:09:26 PM

Let's talk about the league statistics. Lautaro Martinez leads the goalscoring charts with 8 goals. He is followed by Pulisic with 7 goals. Hakan Çalhanoğlu, a midfielder, is third with 6 goals. In terms of assists, Nico Paz, on loan from Real Madrid, is at the top with 5 assists, followed by Dimarco with 5 assists. Both players share the top spot. Was there any player who didn't meet your expectations this year? Do you think the number of goals scored in the top scorer race is low?

I am not surprised to see L. Martinez at the top of the rankings. He has been one of the league's best strikers for years now. Pulisic is a surprise. Calhanoglu is only up there because he is Inter's penalty kick taker. He would have fewer goals to his name if it weren't for the penalty kicks. I don't think that Nico Paz is on a loan from Real. It's true that he played at Real in the recent past. But he has a contract with Como until 2028. However, several well-informed journalists have already reported that he is going to be repurchased by Real at the end of the current season for a hefty sum.

Regarding players that didn't meet my expectations. The first one that comes to mind is Jonathan David from Juventus. I remember him from his Lille days. He hasn't settled in well.

Everybody's talking about scorers but nobody's asking why are the goals so low this season? Lautaro scored 8 goals in late December. Immobile had 17 by now back in 2019. The winner of this year may end up with 18-20 goals total. The goals dried up because Italian football went full defensive nerd mode. Every team's got analysts optimizing their low block positioning and it's killed the game. You watch and it's just... passing around the perimeter forever because the middle's locked down tighter than a bank vault.

That's why Paz is so valuable despite the fact that he plays for Como. He's one of the few players who are able to actually break these defensive walls down through dribbling through them. Same with Dimarco at Inter. He just spams crosses until one works because that's the only way to make chances against these low blocks.

Pulisic's not surprising if you know what Milan's game plan is under Allegri. They sit back and absorb pressure and then hit you with one chance. Look at the derby - Milan only barely touched the ball in Inter's half, scored off of a rebound, and then locked the game down. That's Allegri football. One moment of quality and then defend for your life. Pulisic's just the guy that just happens to be in the right place when that moment comes.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:38:44 PM

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 11:45:06 AM

E vidiš, na ovaj način bi mogao riješiti problem moje Bitcoin adrese koju koristim u zadnje 2-3 godine za sve i svašta. Kako sam napisao, onaj bot mi daje Medium risk (jer ima BTC-a stvarno od svuda). E sad, problem je kako provjeriti hoće li primjerice Blofin raditi probleme ako napravim deposit "problematičnog" BTC-a. Jer iako vidim da mi je adresa Medium risk, nemam pojma koji točno BTC mi je označen kao problematičan, a koji je čist. Ako pošaljem samo mali iznos, možda pošaljem čisti BTC što mi onda ne znači ništa. Nije ni ukupan iznos ogroman, ali dovoljno da ne želim ostati bez toga, a ne želim niti slati nikakve dokumente.

Blofin je centralizovana mjenačnica. Kao i svi drugi takvi CEX-ovi, u svojim uslovima korištenja spominju KYC i provjeru identiteta. Možda to ne rade svima ili često ali ako ima potrebe, budi siguran da hoće. Bacit će te pod autobus ako im je to u interesu i ako budu morali.

Kad sam spomenuo no KYC mjenačnice, mislio sam na Peach Bitcoin, Splash, Thorchain, Bisq, ili nešto slično.

examplens je u jednom od prethodnih postova spomenuo da se može kontaktirati korisnička služba Swapuz instant mjenačnice i tražiti od njih da ti provjere 'risk score' adrese. Ako ti oni kažu da je sve ok, onda bi to značilo da kod njih možeš uraditi swap bez dodatnih pitanja. Nemoj misliti da je ovo preporuka. Nisam nikad koristio tu mjenačnicu ali ako već rade taj 'taint score', više mi se sviđa taj njihov sistem nego da prvo pošalješ pa onda razmišljaš hoće li blokirati i šta dalje.

E, hvala ti puno na ovim informacijama. Ne znam treba li me biti sram, ali jedva da sam čuo za neke od ovih burzi. Nisam siguran jesam li promašio post o Swapuz burzi ili sam jednostavno zaboravio, ali mislim da će taj put biti najbolji. Sad kad smo već raspravljali o tome, najbolje je odmah "očistiti" Bitcoin koji imam umjesto da ga slučajno pošaljem na neki CEX i onda eto problema.

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on December 24, 2025, 09:48:34 PM

(They *have* found addresses that have been used, but no coins yet)

This is not true, unless you refer to addresses with weak private keys. (less than 40 bits, or used in treasure hunts.)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:23:39 PM

Then we would see a new level of speculation: was it satoshi that moved his coins, someone who stole them from him, or has someone been successful in creating a strong-enough quantum computer.

Or maybe someone who is not Satoshi, did not steal them from Satoshi, does not own a quantum computer, and simply happened to mine them during the early days! Just saying. Grin

Quote from: fillippone on Today at 04:30:27 PM

Regarding Satoshi stash, I am sure it is spread over many addresses, but I have no idea on the characteristics of the addresses.

The myth is based on what's known as "Patoshi pattern." It is the nonce values in block templates that seemingly follow a pattern, not the addresses.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:23:39 PM

Quote from: fillippone on Today at 02:54:06 PM

Lowering the amount of BTC held in a single address reduces the attractiveness to an attacker.
Having 1,000,000 BTC on a single private key is much more risky in the event of a quantum computer breakthrough than having 1,000,000 private keys, each with a single BTC.

What you are saying makes sense. However, the most attractive treasure chest and the whole reason of this drama are the bitcoins being associated with satoshi from his mining days. It's more than likely that those coins aren't going anywhere. They won't be shared amongst multiple new addresses. If satoshi is still around and has control of his private keys, I think he will move his BTC from P2PK outputs to a segwit or multisig script. Then we would see a new level of speculation: was it satoshi that moved his coins, someone who stole them from him, or has someone been successful in creating a strong-enough quantum computer.

I perfectly understood the point, and I was referring to the ones that have this choice.
I remember, for example, that Bitwise used to hold all their Bitcoin banking the ETF on a single address.
I am pretty sure that, after the criticism about this choice (also by an Italian bitcoiner) they moved the bitcoins on various addresses.
Regarding Satoshi stash, I am sure it is spread over many addresses, but I have no idea on the characteristics of the addresses.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:15:30 AM

On a personal note, I don't like that the Cake Wallet integration only works with the Trezor Safe 7. I doubt there is a software or hardware limitation that prevents the company from enabling the same kind of support for models Safe 3 and Safe 5. I think they just didn't want to. It seems like it's a matter of: "If you want it, then buy our most expensive hardware wallet." Perhaps they will reconsider in the future.

I agree but what advantage does the Cake wallet have over Trezor suite to make this a deal breaker? I have not tested it yet, but it looks like Trezor suite for mobile now allows connecting the Safe 7 (via Bluetooth) and all other devices using cable and you can do everything as opposed to before, where only "watching" the wallet was possible.

Quote from: Pmalek on December 22, 2025, 07:56:47 AM

They show images of log-on scanners for PCs, smart ID cards, vein-lock doors, etc. No idea if they have anything tangible at this point or not.

Looks like I have found where it’s all coming from. G‑Knot appears to be the exclusive licensee of Seoul‑based eTunnel Inc.. The latter specializes in the development of finger vein authentication techniques and offers a range of relevant biometric products. Nevertheless, G‑Knot’s presale pricing of $299 and its promised delivery date of January 5, 2026 feel more like hype.

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on December 24, 2025, 09:48:34 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on December 23, 2025, 07:43:10 AM

Back in the days when satoshi mined his coins, the created BTC was sent to P2PK addresses. The outputs were Pay to Public Key, not ...Public Key Hash. The public keys of those early 2009/2010 addresses are already exposed publicly and visible on the blockchain. It is believed that satoshi mined 1 million bitcoin, and I guess the majority of them were sent to P2PK outputs. Since he never transferred his coins anywhere else, neither to P2PKH or Segwit addresses, those coins could be a target if a strong-enough quantum computer ever gets created.

Good luck with that, give it a shot... I know plenty of fellas who have been for a long time.

The interesting thing about harvesting priv keys is that the difficulty goes down as you get faster and with time.

(They *have* found addresses that have been used, but no coins yet)

Guessing private keys has nothing to do with what he is talking about. Those addresses have their public key exposed, and with a practical and large enough quantum computer they will come under a targeted attack. The attacker will derive the private key directly from the public key, and yes with a quantum computer this will be feasible. It is completely different from random guessing private keys and hoping you find something.

What you are referring to is traditional brute-force guessing. But with quantum computers they will use Shor's algorithm to derive the private key more efficiently from the public key. Eventually it will be possible, the question is mostly about when and under what conditions -- how large do the computers have to be and how many resources do they have to expend for a single key.

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on December 24, 2025, 09:48:34 PM

Tis life, split your stash up across multiple addresses. It's been like this forever.

No it has not.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:37:59 AM

/snip

Te coine koji su ti visoko-rizični zamjeni na nekoj od no-KYC mjenačnica kad za to dođe vrijeme. Samo vodi računa da je prava no-KYC mjenačnica a ne neka koja se kao takva predstavlja pa ti onda lupi block nad kriptom i šalje zahtjeve da im dostaviš dokumentaciju i razne dokaze.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:26:45 AM

Quote from: Potato Chips on Today at 12:22:47 AM

PS - looks like Skel's surgery went well. Wishing him a speedy recovery. Happy Holidays once again to everyone. Just a few days till we welcome 2026 too! Cheesy

Happy Holidays everyone!

Skel is a big lad, isn't he!? This is the first time I see a real image of him on X. Not that I was searching for one in the past. Judging by the size of his calves and forearms, I am sure he is a fellow gym & fitness enthusiast.
Cool thick beard, btw. Always wanted to grow one myself but looked silly in the process, so I gave up the idea.

Yes he is and this is not the first time he post his pic on his X account, see media and you can see lots of his pics including videos there.

Also see this video of him playing marble race https://x.com/Skelhorn/status/1932485058260345209/video/1

He really looks cool base on what he post on X.

Slot #: 25
BTC Address: bc1quazl54eae6u42dxgatq8n4xsjpc9ypqs5zngsj,

Helping with the recap so the team can easily input it into the OP.

Code:

DYING_S0UL = Slot #: 10
Pmalek = Slot #: 17
inspace = Slot #: 05
examplens = Slot #: 34, 35
TryNinja = Slot #: 4
Cityhunter34 = Slot #: 02
ovcijisir = Slot #: 27, 37
klarki = Slot #: 33
tvplus006 = Slot #: 23
Tonimez = Slot #: 39
bitmover = Slot #: 06, 07
Peanutswar = Slot# 14
mikel_012 = Slot #: 1
Chilwell = Slot #: 40
Mr. Magkaisa = Slot #: 40
tiCeR = Slot #: 15
UserU = Slot #: 29
POPOLUV = Slot #: 50
Hypnotizer = Slot #: 48
katanic97 = Slot # : 26
ZeroVinsonN = Slot #: 42
xandry = Slot #: 03
rbynxx = Slot # 45
ejikeme24 = Slot # 43, 44
Derekfunds = Slot#: 12
LOCKACO = Slot #: 49
Cryptmuster = Slot #: 38
CONVOAI = Slot #: 09 , 16
LogitechMouse = Slot #:20
DarkState = Slot #: 41
dkbit98 = Slot #: 36, 46
Zwei = Slot #: 22
Bigjoe33 = Slot #: 34
Husna QA = Slot #: 08, 11
Egii Nna = Slot #: 19
taufik123 = Slot#: 04, 18
AakZaki = Slot#: 25

The slot numbers that are not yet filled from 1–50 are:

13, 21, 24, 28, 30, 31, 32, 47

Merry Christmas Meta family 🎁🎄🎁
--------

Quote from: Pmalek on December 23, 2025, 08:03:13 AM

If you would like to try your luck and get a Christmas cash gift, you can participate in the MetaWin giveaway organized by PattyIce on X. All participants have to do is write a comment on his post, saying what is their favorite casino game on MetaWin. The winner gets $200. It can come in handy for some New Year's shopping.

Having followed alot of our gambling platforms, I want to agree that there is alot of freebies on these external platforms x(twitter), discord etcetera and chasing these can reward you but it takes alot of luck to land a prize as the following is mega mega big to compete with Roll Eyes

Merry Christmas once more Cool

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 10:30:18 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:09:47 AM

Scam accusations against casinos because of breaking responsible gambling guidelines do occur occasionally. These people usually claim they should get their money back because they are addicts, shouldn't have been allowed to gamble in the first place, live in restricted territories, are underaged, have multiple accounts, etc. We are yet to see a case where an addict shows up to return the money they won, admitting they broke the ToS, the law, or something else.

Well said. I have also been vocal about it on the scam accusation board, as I see that players are actually trying to exploit the casino by using its terms and conditions. I think I have also pointed out that they would never return the money if they won something from the casino. We often see scam accusations against the casino because the person who reports it usually ends up losing their deposit. Even if they recover the money from the casino, they will likely repeat the same process. So it is kind of gambling without risking anything since the casino will return their deposit just because they are addicted and self excluded before.

-

The service of a casino is to provide us with game's and also making us to risk our money in other to gain more money through our winnings, or we lose to the house.

This brings us down to why we have house edge it obviously make us to lose more to the house.

If all the above is true and facts, why then do we depend or expect casinos to provide us with responsible gambling tools, at least their have self exclusion which is ok and practically visible on most casinos, but we shouldn't expect anything more than that, at least.

Quote from: Pmalek on December 23, 2025, 07:43:10 AM

Quote from: Abelly on December 23, 2025, 05:23:36 AM

Quantum risk is created when someone Spends coins and their Public Key is published on the blockchain.In the case of unspent coins, only the Public Key Hash is visible from which it is not possible to extract the Private Key.Even with a Quantum Computer, Satoshis Coins have never been Spent.The Public Key has never been published, So there is no Opportunity for Attack. If you don't Spend,There is no Quantum risk.If you spend,quantum risk is created.satoshis risk.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:09:47 AM

All that "responsible gaming" is just noise and nonsense, put there because regulators request it. If you want to stop gambling, then stop gambling. If you can't do it on your own, get professional help. Casinos run a business. They want the money addicts and non-addicts bring them. It's the same as with the bar owner who is interested in selling you a drink whether you are an alcoholic or not. Why? Because that's his job, and that's how he makes money.

Scam accusations against casinos because of breaking responsible gambling guidelines do occur occasionally. These people usually claim they should get their money back because they are addicts, shouldn't have been allowed to gamble in the first place, live in restricted territories, are underaged, have multiple accounts, etc. We are yet to see a case where an addict shows up to return the money they won, admitting they broke the ToS, the law, or something else.

They want their money back so they can gamble again somewhere else or at the same place.

+1
What's the point of these self-exclusions on casino sites if customer can re-register with a different email address after being blocked? Even IP blocking is easily bypassed with a VPN or proxies.
Compared to a situation where an alcoholic asks to stop being served at a bar, there's nothing stopping that alcoholic from using makeup to disguise his appearance and buying a drink at the same bar. The problem isn't the bar, but the customer...

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:09:47 AM

You have to look out for yourself in this world, not expect other people and businesses to do it for you. All that "responsible gaming" is just noise and nonsense, put there because regulators request it. If you want to stop gambling, then stop gambling. If you can't do it on your own, get professional help. Casinos run a business. They want the money addicts and non-addicts bring them. It's the same as with the bar owner who is interested in selling you a drink whether you are an alcoholic or not. Why? Because that's his job, and that's how he makes money.

Scam accusations against casinos because of breaking responsible gambling guidelines do occur occasionally. These people usually claim they should get their money back because they are addicts, shouldn't have been allowed to gamble in the first place, live in restricted territories, are underaged, have multiple accounts, etc. We are yet to see a case where an addict shows up to return the money they won, admitting they broke the ToS, the law, or something else.

They want their money back so they can gamble again somewhere else or at the same place.

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 10:30:18 AM

None of this addresses the only question that matters. Why did Bitz receive clear self-exclusion and account-closure requests, acknowledge them, and still fail to apply any restriction even before a single deposit was made?

That failure occurred at time zero. Everything else is noise.

Quote from: coinrifft on December 23, 2025, 10:45:52 PM

I'm not sure if this has been reported here. But in any case, I saw this tweet from Trezor.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/23/Ut4bPd.png

You're the first one to report it on this thread, but on the dedicated "cake wallet" thread, Pmalek reported something similar ^{[at that time, it appeared to be limited to mobile devices only]}. One of Trezor's staff also mentioned that "this only works with Safe 7" devices, but on Cake wallet's "blog post", they're using a picture of a Safe 5 device, so now I'm confused & wondering if it's really limited to Safe 7 or there's a workaround for older Trezor devices.

BTW, a "small update" about the availability of Safe 7 devices:

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:09:47 AM

In general, I agree with you, but if the casino advertises that it has responsible gambling measures in place, it must comply with them. In regulated Europe, fiat casinos comply with these measures; otherwise, they have the regulator breathing down their necks, which can impose heavy fines or even force them to close down. Cryptocurrency casinos were born in a limbo where there was no KYC, no licenses, nothing, but over time they have implemented more measures in this regard, including responsible gaming measures that in most cases are complied with, but in others “stop working.”

But it is true that if you have a problem with gambling, you have to work on yourself, because the moment you enter compulsive mode and want to gamble, you will end up finding a casino where you have not previously excluded yourself.

Quote from: virasog on Today at 05:07:50 PM

Quote from: dkbit98 on December 16, 2025, 08:58:11 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on December 15, 2025, 07:47:13 AM

Unstoppable Wallet has announced a partnership with a yet unnamed third party that will enable users of the wallet to make free USDT transactions on the Tron blockchain (TRC20).

I saw this news but I didn't understand this would only work on Unstoppable wallet.
Tron network is stupid and centralized, and long term this is waste of time and nothing more.
They are probably going to charge higher fees for all swaps to cover for this ''free'' transactions.

I guess this is a good move, and the Tron network might have some partnership with Unstoppable Wallet, so they are offering free USDT transfers.

Ever since Binance Smart Chain transactions are almost free, people prefer to use BNB chain to move USDT and not the trx network. I remember there was a time when it cost a dollar to send USDT via trx chain but now it costs 2 to 3$ and it has become very expensive, much expensive than many other blockchains.

I find it weird when I see free stable coins transfer on any chain, it's rare for these chains to see revenue and then ignore it. One way or the other, they make fees.

I'm not sure if there is any network that will sustain free stable coin transaction for long time, the binance smart chain transaction is a promotion, it will soon come to a stop. I noticed this some month back when I was sending a couple of USDT on BSC and I wasn't charge a fee. Out of curiosity, I checked and it was stated the USDT promo will end on the October and it does. If you try to make USDT transaction now to any address, you will be charge, the fee is minor cents but it's not free.

Only few left stablecoins on BSC is free which is going to end on 31st of December. By the time this promo comes to an end, they will port back to Tron.

saw this blog.

https://www.bnbchain.org/en/blog/move-your-stablecoins-for-free-0-fee-carnival-for-usdc-usd1-transfers-extended

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 06:59:39 AM

Quote from: katanic97 on December 22, 2025, 11:10:13 PM

/snip

Prijavio sam se za duelbits,samo iskreno jer mi odgovaraju pravila kampanje, 20 postova od toga 10 u lokalu,mislim da je fer. Mislim nije ni meni ovde problem da pisem 25 i 5 u lokalu,ali kad sam vec dosta aktivan u lokalu pa neka se i broji,ne? Cheesy

Okej isplata je veca,ali nije glavni razlog zbog kojeg sam se prijavio

Prijavi se onda i u Bitz kampanju koju je Pmalek gore spomenuo. Ja sam u kampanji tog menadžera s istim uvjetima i stvarno sam zadovoljan. Malo mi je u početku bilo čudno što isplata dođe s par dana zakašnjenja, ali najčešće isplati ponedjeljkom (kampanja traje od subote do petka). Meni se jako sviđa što nema nikakvih ograničenja za pisanje (nema posebne sekcije foruma gdje moraš pisati).

Krenuo sam danas da se prijavim i vidim da sam upao u Duelbits (iskreno nisam ocekivao Cheesy

) tako da je idealno,uslovi su to sto mi najvise odgovara + je veca isplata od moje prethodne kampanje,tako da idealno. Inace prva kampanja mi je bila betfury , kad sam se vratio ove godine na forum,bas ta u kojoj si ti,tu je "no limit for local boards". Secam se da sam imao 45+ odobrenih postova Cheesy

po nedelji bas zbog tog uslova jer nema limita