Last update: 2025-09-18_Thu_22.00h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Pmalek receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Pmalek
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Pmalek" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 65820738 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 21:03:13 CEST 2025) in Novosti:
Centralizovana mjenačnica TradeOgre je izgleda hakovana ili su napravili exit scam. Iako je bila CEX, TradeOgre nije zahtjevala KYC. Mjenačnica je imala problema oko 2 mjeseca i web stranica im jedno vrijeme nije bila dostupna a nisu se ni oglašavali u javnosti da objasne šta se događa.
Jućer je sa adresa TradeOgre poslan bitcoin i ethereum vrijedan preko $30 miliona. Na blockchainu se može vidjeti op_return poruka da su sredstva sad pod kontrolom Kanadske vlade i policije. Ne bi bio prvi put da nečiji državni subjekt zaplijeni kripto berzu ili mikser ali je ipak sumnjivo da se Kanadske institucije nisu službeno očitovale o ovom slučaju ako su one zaslužne za pad TradeOgre. Zato mislim da su ili hakirani ili su nestali sa lovom korisnika.
https://www.therage.co/tradeogre-theft/Evo nam i nastavka. Izgleda da nije riječ o hacku ili rug pullu jer je kanadska policija
objavila da je zaplijenila oko 40 milijuna USD sa TradeOgre mjenjačnice zbog malverzacija vezanih uz pranje novca i kršenje kanadskih zakona. Ne znam gdje je mjenjačnica bila bazirana, ali pretpostavljam u Kanadi ako su oni zaplijenili kripto.
2. Post 65819685 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 15:55:13 CEST 2025) in Judge my security of how I created my Bitcoin wallet:
~snip~
Pmalek already suggested a hardware wallet, and for less than $70 you can buy a Trezor and avoid having to take so many steps
If the OP wants a complicated solution and has the time to make it a reality, I really have no problem with that. It is true that there are much simpler solutions, such as investing in a hardware wallet, although for those who want to store only their BTC private keys, I would always recommend choosing the air-gapped option, whether it is an old computer that they will turn into an AGW (air-gapped wallet) or they will decide to buy one such device.
Don't get me wrong, Trezor is a good device (I have one too), but anything that connects online carries certain risks that I'd rather avoid for a relatively small price.
3. Post 65819098 (unedited backup) (by ultrloa) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 12:30:01 CEST 2025) in BTC Investor Losses 7,4 BTC with Fake Sparrow Wallet Mobile App:
As lame as it sounds that the person download the wrong app on their phone it's possible that many people will still fall for the same scam trick because this days people want the easiest way to access their digital assets.
They will never stop looking for easy ways to do so, android and iPhone is in the hands of billions of people in the world, more accessible than laptops and PC, so sparrow wallet is only available for computers but not everyone has a computer.
This is what will triggers many people to fall for any fake sparrow wallets they find on appstore...
As you realized from your own example, that can be a very dangerous way to approach things. Just because you wish there was a mobile app for a service you use and like, doesn't mean there is one or that you can make it available on your wish alone.
I wonder if people do the same thing in traditional finance. For example, going to the Play Store or App Store to find a mobile app for their debit card. This is something you set up with your bank, not on your own. You don't find an app that looks good on an app store, download it, and enter your card details.
People should be even more careful with their bitcoin because there is no second chance. Banks have chargebacks and ways to recover stolen fiat. Bitcoin doesn't on a protocol level.
The problem with people is they are late to realize that they made mistake. They wait that they get compromised before they do those proper verification to know that the app they are using is real and not the clone ones.
I'm not really comfortable putting up my card details on app store on Play Store since I think there's huge risk for doing this that's why I usually choose the other option which I think safer.
People really need to exert lots of precautionary measure to make sure that they are safe since its so bad for them to do it when they already lose some money. We should learn from bad experiences happened to some people since everything is avoidable if we just exert effort to research somethings before proceeding for taking critical decisions.
4. Post 65818689 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 09:56:31 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
There is one interesting video showing a match from Finland. The keeper takes a goal kick and passes the ball to his defender. The player who receives the ball turns around and shoots it in his own net above the keeper. No one does or says anything.
There is a clip in the Bundesliga where Mark Flekken went to drink water while the game was in play and his team conceded a goal. He claimed to have not heard the whistle for the restart of the game. Should bookies not settle bets on that game too, it could be interpreted as manipulation?
There are many such isolated incidents at the top level of the game, it is expected as you go lower to semi-pros, to amateurish football, there will be worse blunders in the game by virtue of their lack of quality and professionalism. I would not acknowledge highlights of the game as evidence of match fixing in this case along with drawing in ties of the players nationality. Fairlay will have to prove that there was an official ruling and a criminal ring was apprehended or something of the sort.
If bookies look hard enough, they can string together highlights of many amateur matches that could pass as fixing. Where do we draw the line with that?
If you take the bet, for such a high amount, you settle the winnings, count your losses and change your approach.
- Jay -
It's not the book doing the tracking. It's done by companies such as Sportradar. They then make the sportsbooks aware of what happened.
Throughout 2024, Sportradar Integrity Services monitored more than 850,000 matches across 70 sports worldwide and 1,108 suspicious matches were identified, a 17% decrease from 2023. The highest number of suspicious matches were found across Europe, the region historically facing the most significant integrity issues.
5. Post 65818662 (unedited backup) (by un_rank) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 09:42:50 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
There is one interesting video showing a match from Finland. The keeper takes a goal kick and passes the ball to his defender. The player who receives the ball turns around and shoots it in his own net above the keeper. No one does or says anything.
There is a clip in the Bundesliga where Mark Flekken went to drink water while the game was in play and his team conceded a goal. He claimed to have not heard the whistle for the restart of the game. Should bookies not settle bets on that too, it could be interpreted as manipulation?
There are many such isolated incidents at the top level of the game, it is expected as you go lower to semi-pros, to amateurish football, there will be lots worse calamities in the game by virtue of their lack of quality and professionalism. I would not acknowledge highlights of the game as evidence of match fixing in this case along with drawing in ties of the players nationality. Fairlay will have to prove that there was an official ruling and a criminal ring was apprehended or get some other form of official evidence.
If bookies look hard enough, they can string together highlights of many amateur matches that could pass as fixing. Where do we draw the line with that?
If you take the bet, for such a high amount, you settle the winnings, count your losses and change your approach.
- Jay -
6. Post 65818639 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 09:33:25 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
This is Francesco Baranca's LinkedIn profile for those interested in checking out who he is.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/francesco-baranca-26ab14129/That's the integrity expert mentioned in the article Fairlay linked to last year.
I took a quick look at some of his recent posts and they are all about match fixing incidents in sports all over the world.
There is one interesting video showing a match from Finland. The keeper takes a goal kick and passes the ball to his defender. The player who receives the ball turns around and shoots it in his own net above the keeper. No one does or says anything.
If you do a google search on "Francesco Baranca Finland", you will find several of his posts where he talks about Finnish soccer. Among those is a case of Ukrainian and Brazilian players moving to Finland to play in low-division teams. I am only mentioning this because Fairlay was suspicious of a team consisting of Ukrainian players who performed badly in some matches.
Here are 4 of the Ukrainian players. I did a deep dive into the fixing to see if Fairlay was lying going as far as translating articles in Finnish.
What about the other 4 fixed matches. Names, teams and how everyone is associated is now being posted on forums. Some books no longer take wagers on some of the teams. There were 5 fixed matches that the player bet. I'll go over the first one. There are 4 Ukranian players on Futura. All 4 were involved in questionable activity. Others were clean.
Kiffen vs. Futura
1. Sinitsyn kicked the ball in his own goal.
2. Bazhan received a red card. No other red cards for the team.
3. Moiseiev received a yellow card. No other yellow cards for the team.
4. Kasakovv goalkeeper gave up 6 goals.
7. Post 65818138 (unedited backup) (by Johnlomape) (scraped on Thu Sep 18 04:17:13 CEST 2025) in Educative encyclopedia for the Naija Board :
I felt there is a need to have a list of important topics that had been discussed in the past so we all can reminiscent on some of these them that can be educative to the Naija board. There are so many topics I have compiled on my noted that will be beneficial to both the Naija board and the forum since new topics easily overtake the good old ones that might make searching for them be very difficult.
Some of these topics had been translated to the Pigin language for those that might find it easy to grab and comprehend in the Naija Native English tongue. I so much appreciate the people that devoted their time to translate someone the topics to our local native English for fluency sake.
Everyone is welcome to peruse these topics and I promise to add more so we can be enlightened to those important topics that might have slide through our eyes.
...More updates soon!
8. Post 65816997 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 20:12:37 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
I will now take some time to look at Freebitco.in and the reasons for their negative feedback. From what I have seen so far, it looks as I will kick them off the list. I want to check a few more threads, though.
Freebitco has fallen a long, long way and are proven scammers now sadly for a plethora of reasons. They are slowly and steadily getting banned in different countries from around the world.
I advise removing it from the list asap since it would take a miracle for them to recover from such a disastrous state honestly speaking.
9. Post 65816847 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 19:24:37 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
According to mononaut, there were only 3 stale blocks in the last 5000 mined blocks, and they weren't caused by below 1 sat/vByte transactions. mononaut concludes that it made sense to lower the minimum fee rates. The miners earned a bit more in fees without increasing the average number of stale blocks.
Since some changes that occurred in the network in 2017 or 2018 (I don't remember anymore), the probability of obsolete blocks is very low. Therefore, when it happens, it has little to do with transactions.
I think he only considered the difference between what the miners earned
That kinda makes sense, it shows miners who don't mine <1 sat/vbyte what they're missing.
Exact.
It reminds us of those people who don't bend down when they see coins of small value on the ground. But this ground is full of these coins, but as they don't want to go down, they will lose a lot of money.
10. Post 65816048 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 15:00:25 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
I think he only considered the difference between what the miners earned
That kinda makes sense, it shows miners who don't mine <1 sat/vbyte what they're missing.
11. Post 65815932 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 14:23:32 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
- They have earned an additional 7.49 BTC in transaction fees while doing it.
I don't think you can conclude this without comparing the blocks before lower fees were accepted. If, for instance, 6 million transactions paying 1 sat/vbyte were replaced by 9 million transactions paying 0.3 sat/vbyte, miners earned less.
12. Post 65815778 (unedited backup) (by gunhell16) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 13:31:20 CEST 2025) in MetaWin.com | The First WEB3 Casino:
Another big win for a MetaWin slots player happened yesterday. A player won $15,150 on a $15 stake, which makes it 1010 times his bet. The slot he played was Big Bass Bonanza 1000 by Pragmatic Play. I think this is not the first time this particular game has payed out big on MetaWin, and the same slot has been mentioned in similar situations.
The replay of the win is available on the link below:
https://www.pplink.social/XT7G2IjpzAIs that really true? I watched and saw that the player won around $15,150? It looked like a demo account, though I’m not sure about it. I only said that because their wins were happening
one after another. Although I do believe some of it, I still find it a bit doubtful that it’s real. Sorry, dude.
It could also be that the player was just really lucky. Anyway, I tried playing it myself with only a small amount, just in case I’d get lucky too.
I did enjoy it somehow — I even won a little, but in the end, I still lost overall.
13. Post 65815723 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 13:05:31 CEST 2025) in Novosti:
Centralizovana mjenačnica TradeOgre je izgleda hakovana ili su napravili exit scam. Iako je bila CEX, TradeOgre nije zahtjevala KYC. Mjenačnica je imala problema oko 2 mjeseca i web stranica im jedno vrijeme nije bila dostupna a nisu se ni oglašavali u javnosti da objasne šta se događa.
Jućer je sa adresa TradeOgre poslan bitcoin i ethereum vrijedan preko $30 miliona. Na blockchainu se može vidjeti op_return poruka da su sredstva sad pod kontrolom Kanadske vlade i policije. Ne bi bio prvi put da nečiji državni subjekt zaplijeni kripto berzu ili mikser ali je ipak sumnjivo da se Kanadske institucije nisu službeno očitovale o ovom slučaju ako su one zaslužne za pad TradeOgre. Zato mislim da su ili hakirani ili su nestali sa lovom korisnika.
https://www.therage.co/tradeogre-theft/Za tu mjenjacnicu sam cuo ali je nisam nikada koristio...
Koliko sam vidio sa brzim pretrazivanjem nije ukradeno previse brc u usporedbi sa FTX (na TradeOgre je ukradeno 126 BTC, dok je FTX ostecen za nekoliko tisuca BTC) a koliko vidim taj hack i nije previse utjecao na pad cijene.
Iskreno meni bi odgovarao pad cijene da kupim nesto BTC ali izgleda da ovaj dogadaj nije stvorio veliki odjek u vijestima da uzrokuje neki znacajni pad cijene. Sjecam se kad je FTX bio u problemima, to se stvarno odrazilo jako na trziste.
14. Post 65815474 (unedited backup) (by 3kpk3) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 11:28:55 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
My last post on this. The Gambling Integrity Unit stated that the matches were 100% fixed. Fairlay agreed to abide by their decision. No book waits a year for a case to conclude in a court of law. There were only 4 Ukrainian players on the team and all 4 were making obvious mistakes.Going from memory there was one match where one of the 4 players kicked the ball in his own goal. Another got a red card. The goal keeper let up easy goals and I forget what the 4th did. All 4 pulled similar stunts in multiple matches. Live bets were made just prior to these things happening. No book is going to let this go for $70k.
The investigations have concluded.
There is no need to drag this matter out any further people. Pmalek has made it pretty clear that he still trusts Fairlay which is why it is still on the table while Bitcoin-Betting won't be added.
It's just sad to see one of very few proper crypto betting exchanges get caught up in such big controversies within this forum in my opinion.
15. Post 65815235 (unedited backup) (by KiaKia) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 09:42:02 CEST 2025) in BTC Investor Losses 7,4 BTC with Fake Sparrow Wallet Mobile App:
Sparrow is only available on desktops and not mobile phone.
This Jimmy believed he was downloading a genuine version of a Sparrow Wallet app for his iPhone from the App Store.
Scammers have known already that we mostly use Android on this forum and that we do always report them. Apple app store was not mostly used before but Android Play store. But after many reports and taking down of their scam apps, they moved to App store for Apple. This is the reason App store scam wallets are many now.
As lame as it sounds that the person download the wrong app on their phone it's possible that many people will still fall for the same scam trick because this days people want the easiest way to access their digital assets.
They will never stop looking for easy ways to do so, android and iPhone is in the hands of billions of people in the world, more accessible than laptops and PC, so sparrow wallet is only available for computers but not everyone has a computer.
This is what will triggers many people to fall for any fake sparrow wallets they find on appstore, I was a victim of this scam but I lost small amount of Bitcoin that costs around $300.
I thought I knew it all but I was thought a new lesson, if a well popular crypto wallet company doesn't announced a mobile wallet it's wrong to go looking for one and if they announced one make sure you download from the official website.
16. Post 65815206 (unedited backup) (by Kruw) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 09:28:26 CEST 2025) in Cake wallet - Requesting honest reviews:
Among them is the likes of ChangeNOW. We know they can't be trusted.
Cake's CEO knowingly partnered with ChangeNOW after finding out they seize funds:
17. Post 65815168 (unedited backup) (by apogio) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 09:11:55 CEST 2025) in Cake wallet - Requesting honest reviews:
That's always a risk when you use third-party instant exchanges that allow themselves to block, reject, or simply confiscate your money due to X, Y, Z reasons. Looking at
this screenshot from their website, Cake Wallet uses different swap providers. Among them is the likes of ChangeNOW. We know they can't be trusted. But there are better swap providers as well. Anyways, you can let the app choose an instant exchange itself or pick one from the list.
I'd slightly rephrase your words, saying that I believe no exchange can be trusted. Literally none of them. I'm sick of the exchanges that are supposed to be KYC-free but suddenly they decide to ask for KYC data.
Is this the official latest list of exchanges that they use?
https://docs.cakewallet.com/support/swap/If so, just look at some of the reviews in kycnot.me and you'll understand what I'm saying:
| ServiceReview Summary |
| exolixShotgun KYC - May request KYC and block funds based on automated triggers. |
| sideshift KYC on authorities request - No routine KYC, but may cooperate with authorities, block funds or implement future KYC requirements. |
18. Post 65815152 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 09:03:19 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
The evidence was shown in Fairlay's/Bitcoin-Betting's first post. Anyone that bets sports knew immediately that the matches were fixed.
I don't view their first post with the videos and explanations of moments from matches as evidence either. But good on them if they saw that and believed something was wrong. An investigation is underway that will hopefully shed more light on the events.
I'm not trying to persuade you to add them to your list.
Fairlay was already on the list. My reason for checking that case involving allegedly fixed matches was because I was considering removing them after seeing the negative feedback on their profile. After I did, I decided not to. At the same time, I am not going to add Bitcoin-Betting to the table, but the reason for that has got nothing to do with the investigation of the Finnish league matches.
My last post on this. The Gambling Integrity Unit stated that the matches were 100% fixed.No book waits a year for a case to conclude in a court of law. There were only 4 Ukrainian players on the team and all 4 were making obvious mistakes.Going from memory there was one match where one of the 4 players kicked the ball in his own goal. Another got a red card. The goal keeper let up easy goals and I forget what the 4th did. All 4 pulled similar stunts in multiple matches.No book is going to let this go for $70k.
19. Post 65814451 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 00:20:01 CEST 2025) in Cake wallet - Requesting honest reviews:
The newest 5.4.0 version of Cake Wallet introduces a new and interesting feature called Pay Anything.
Essentially, it allows you to send crypto to any address using any other cryptocurrency that you have. Cake Wallet uses its swap providers in the background to swap crypto A to crypto B and automates the swapping and sending process for you.
This is not bad feature to have but question is what happens if those background partners mark some transaction as risky.
If we are forced to perform KYC verification or they won't return coins, than I would not use this option.
And monero solves this because there are no ''risky'' coins, just saying.
20. Post 65814158 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 22:18:37 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
What evidence? Are you talking about the Finnish article mentioning that there is an on-going investigation? That's not evidence. That's just a media report that may be based on actual evidence but we (the public) haven't seen that evidence.
Please check his post history and feedback on this member and than ignore the rat.
I dont see any of his posts for a long time.
I am exclusively a sports bettor. You, however, probably are not.
He is exclusive asking money from casinos to put them higher in his rat list
Dont expect this guy to understand anything you are saying, I learned that few years ago.
Go ahead and check my posting feedback. No one has ever said anything bad about me other than those paid by Sportsbet. You started stalking me years ago after I put up a rating for Sportsbet. I don't take money from anyone and rarely post the rating list so I don't know why anyone would pay. Stick to the topic at hand instead of personal attacks and stalking.
21. Post 65814145 (unedited backup) (by notblox1) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 22:14:37 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
What evidence? Are you talking about the Finnish article mentioning that there is an on-going investigation? That's not evidence. That's just a media report that may be based on actual evidence but we (the public) haven't seen that evidence.
Please check his post history and feedback on this member and than ignore the rat.
I dont see any of his posts for a long time.
I am exclusively a sports bettor. You, however, probably are not.
He is exclusive asking money from casinos to put them higher in his rat list
Dont expect this guy to understand anything you are saying, I learned that few years ago.
22. Post 65813221 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 18:01:31 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
My question is why allowing such games for betting in the first place, if they know they are risky and can be fixed?
That's what many people have asked and rightly so. There should definitely be a staking limit on markets where the possibility of manipulation is higher. Then, even if cheaters and match fixers try to do their dirty business at the bookie/exchange, they wouldn't be able to profit and cheat as much.
Also, do they still allow high-stakes bets to be placed on that league and other low-division Finnish leagues, including the clubs involved in the scandal?
I also followed the Fairlay case. efialtis, holydarkness and the Sports Integrity Unit all had the same evidence. The sports integrity unit said the games were 100% fixed.
What evidence? Are you talking about the Finnish article mentioning that there is an on-going investigation? That's not evidence. That's just a media report that may be based on actual evidence but we (the public) haven't seen that evidence.
If you do decide to add them the fees are .1 mBTC for BTC withdrawals and gas for ETH.
Thanks. At the moment I won't be adding Bitcoin Betting to the table.
The evidence was shown in Fairlay's first post.
23. Post 65813187 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 17:52:14 CEST 2025) in Blockstream Jade Plus:
@Pmalek, I checked the Blockstream App and that app has the option for users to buy Bitcoin directly through the app, and if it has that option, then of course it has certain requirements, one of which is e-mail. Such purchases are made through 3rd party exchanges, now the only question is whether anyone else can see this data, or whether they can connect that email with the fact that its owner is also the owner of Blockstream Jade.
If it was leaked somewhere at Blockstream, then it would be logical for a larger number of their users to come forward, although again, perhaps that database was only partially leaked.
https://help.blockstream.com/hc/en-us/articles/46682922987929-Buy-bitcoin
24. Post 65809329 (unedited backup) (by Upgrade00) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 16:07:37 CEST 2025) in 🏈 bet105.ag - NFL Week 3 - Thur, 18th Sep 🏈 🏆 $200 in rewards 🏆:
Friendly tag for previous participants and lovers of NFL;
Doan9269
mitchr4
alexrossi
B1g4udge
morvillz7z
Dr.Osh
Pmalek
rbynxx
mv1986
vanesha
Renato297
Harkorede
Koal-84
Danydee
BABY SHOES
JeiLian
f150
KTChampions
godweles888
Teethow
bitzizzix
xLays
notblox1
LFC_Bitcoin
holydarkness
slaman29
CLS63
Let me know if you would like me to not tag you for this sort of contests in the future
25. Post 65808659 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 12:42:55 CEST 2025) in Blockstream Jade Plus:
@Pmalek, are we talking about email addresses associated with ordering these devices or do users of this device perhaps have the option to enter their email address into their app wallet?
Some of us have learned a lesson and do not buy such devices in such a way as to put our personal data at risk. However, it is possible that someone is using previously leaked databases and sending random e-mail messages hoping that some of those messages will reach the owner of this device.
I regularly receive spam messages for wallets and CEXs that I have never used, so I am sure it is exactly the tactic I mentioned. They usually end up in the spam folder, from which they are automatically deleted after a while, but if they end up in the main inbox, I make sure to mark them as spam and hopefully help prevent others from receiving them in their main inbox.
26. Post 65807032 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 23:25:20 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
Ja se kasno javljam,zaboravio sam da pitam @Pmalek da li je danas ispratio ovu goleadu? Mislim glupo pitanje,verovatno da jeste
Jesam, naravno. Luda utakmica, slična onoj prošlogodišnjoj na Meazzi kad je bilo 4:4. Inter je većim dijelom utakmice bio bolji i oni su bili ti koji su napadali i držali loptu. Juve je dobro iskoristio prilike koje su im se ukazale.
Napoli i Juventus sad maksimalnim ucinkom po 3 pobede a posebno mi je zanimljivo sto je Rasmus Hojlund dao gol,znaci svako ko ode iz Uniteda postane ozbiljan igrac,bar tako ispada
Dobar trio mi izgleda De Bruyne , Mc Tominay i Hojlund za sada,bice svakako zanimljivo kada se sastanu Napoli i Juve .
Hojlund je prešao u Napoli pred sami kraj prelaznog roka nakon što se Lukaku povrijedio. Ne sumnjam da Conte neće izvuči iz njega maksimum. Napoli ima tri dobra teškaša u napadu u Lukaku, Hojlundu i Lucci.
Mislim da su oni i dalje glavni favorit za Scudetto. Inter sa Chivu-om neće biti ista ekipa kao sa Inzaghijem.
Jeste da,sad si me podsetio na tu od prosle godine kada je bilo 4:4,stvarno te utakmice Serije A znaju biti "absolute cinema"
Znam da nece biti ista ekipa ali tek je pocetak,znamo sve sta se izdesavalo prosle sezone,zakuvalo se svako mesto za ligu sampiona i nismo znali osvajaca skudeta do poslednje utakmice. Juventus mi je za sada najveca pretnja za Napoli,nekako taj duel na listicu vidim kao preveliki X vec unapred
Sorry na smaranju sa Serijom A,ali verujem da ima nasih koji je prate
Ma kakvo smaranje
Uvijek mi je drago kada netko piše nešto u ovoj temi, bez obzira na koju ligu ili sport se odnosi.
Nisam gledao utakmicu jer talijane skoro nikada ne gledam ali malo više ovakvih utakmica bi me mogli i prisliti da se prebacim s Premier Lige tu i tamo. Pogotovo ako PL krene u smjeru kako je jučer išlo.
Dobro, PL je svakako najjaca liga,pratimo je svi. Ova dva rezultata danas su bas onako kako sam mislio da ce biti. Salahov penal u 90+ i strasnih 3-0 za City. Nazlost United nastavlja gde je stao,i to mozda jos gore nego ikad...
Sorry na smaranju sa Serijom A,ali verujem da ima nasih koji je prate
Ma kakve smaranje, prati se i dalje kod na Serie A. Gledao sam jucer utakmicu do jedno 80 minute a onda sam morao ici nesto obaviti. Znaci, uspio sam propustiti sam kraj utakmice i cirkus. /facepalm
Objektivno Inter je bolji tim ali jebiga, ne pobjedjuju uvijek bolji. Mislim da ce za Juventus vrhunac biti osiguravanje lige prvaka, za titulu mislim da i dalje nisu spremni. Bar ne po ovome sto sam ja do sada vidio ove sezone.
Alaa,otisao si kad je bilo najzanimljivije,propustio si dva gola
Znas kako,tek je pocetak a Juventus deluje bolje nego prosle sezone sa Tudorom svakako. Videli smo da se forma igraca podigla na visi nivo i ono,moze bit svasta. Inter sa dva poraza na pocetku nikad nije dobro zavrsavao sezonu,pa cemo videti,nadajmo se bar upola onako zanimljivoj Seriji A kao prosle godine
27. Post 65806358 (unedited backup) (by Abdulzuruku01) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 20:04:20 CEST 2025) in Info-thread: Translation of Useful English topics to Naija languages, pidgin etc:
Original Topic: How to Create and use a Sparrow Border Wallet Author: Pmalek
If you want more information for border wallets I go suggest make you read
Are border wallets di modification of brain wallet?I never see other posts wey mention sey Sparrow get di feature wey dey allow people to create border wallets. I no be di supporter of dis type of wallet, but na still di hot wallet option you fit use if u dey travel and/or if I dey cross borders. I no see reason why u go use dis one as ur everyday wallet.
How to Create a Border Wallet for Sparrow1. Open di Sparrow and click "New Wallet."
2. Name am and click di "Create Wallet" button.
3. Under "Keystores" click "New or Import Software Wallet."
4. Click di dropdown menu next to "Mnemonic Words (BIP39)" to select "Border Wallets Grid."
5. For di Border Wallets Grid window click di "Generate Grid" button for di bottom left.
6. For di new window wey pops up click "Generate New."
7. Di software go generate 12 words. You fit but you don't need to back am up. Di word inform di software about di order for which to put all possible seed words (2048) into di Border Wallets Grid.
8. Click "OK" and save di copy of di grid for ur computer.
9. Draw di image pattern for di grid by clicking di 11 or 23 boxes in di order wey u fit remember (for example image wey I post for down). You go need to remember whr you start and do pattern which u create.
10. Click "OK."
11. Di words u select for di first grid go automatic select and you need to enter di last word (12th or 24th) manually. You need to remember dis last word and/or write am down somewhere/back am up.
12. When u don finish, click "Create Keystore."
13. Click "Import Keystore."
14. Click "Apply" and enter di wallet password if you want.
now u don create di new Bitcoin Border Wallet for Sparrow.
Keep copies of your Border Wallet Grid wey Sparrow create because you go need am in case of wallet recovery. Di grid emself no fit be use to steal ur coins without knowledge of di correct image pattern. You fit save di file digitally anyway you want am because e no get sensitive information inside am.
How to Recover di Border Wallet for Sparrow1. Open di Sparrow to click "New Wallet."
2. Name am and click di "Create Wallet" button.
3. Under "Keystores" click "New or Import Software Wallet."
4. Click di dropdown menu next to "Mnemonic Words (BIP39)" and select "Border Wallets Grid."
5. For di Border Wallets Grid window click di "Load PDF" button at di bottom left.
6. Find di location where u first save ur Border Wallet Grid and open am. Dat loads di grid with di words for di same order u first create.
7. Draw ur pattern in correct order and click "OK."
8. Select di 12th/24th word wey u first use for di dropdown menu.
9. If u don finish, click "Create Keystore."
10. Click "Import Keystore."
11. Click "Apply" and enter ur wallet password if e need.
na di example of a filled out Border Wallet Grid be dis:
Ben from BTC Session na em get credit for dis wan, na dere I see di info for Sparrow's Border Wallets.
Unlock Sparrow Bitcoin Wallet’s Hidden Power: Advanced Features Tutorial
28. Post 65804546 (unedited backup) (by stompix) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 10:47:13 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
They are different things!
The network is secure due to the decentralization of the hash, not its quantity.
Yeah no...
You, Loycev, Pmalek with your gpu cards and me with my broken s19 that lies in the corner, could all mine Bitcoin and keep mining decentralized, while Philip would be able to revert blocks after we mined for 100 years with his asic farm.
Would you feel secure if you knew anyone with a million dollars could buy enough gear to attack the network? I can already see the next MrBeast episode!
So, it is up to users, how much Proof of Work they will want to spend in the future, to protect their own coins.
The average Joe will not spend a dime for this, he will always ask others to pay for it, and from there you force the big bag holders to subsidize the security, which means the security depends on those with huge interests in the price and I have a feeling I've already seen this system in place
Also, when I'm talking about an attack, I'm not talking about reverting a transaction from ages ago, but making the chain a pain in the ass to use, tumbling the price of BTC, making more miners leave, and lowering the hashrate making the attacks more successful. You don't even need 51% to cause havoc, you just need timing, from block 914604 to 914609 ViaBTC with 10% of the hashrate mined 5 blocks but we're fine since it's mega farms behind this that have no incentive to do so, now, if this could be achieved with a guy from Australia
with 100 S21 in his basement that is pissed at the original non-SV vision, how would you feel?
It's not me it's CK:
Now that solo ckpool has mined a block with sub 1sat/vB transactions I have data on the reward mined as the result of a low transaction fee period. Of the ~4900 transactions mined in this block, ~3300 were sub 1sat/vB transactions. It took some time to sift through the data of these transactions to determine what the mined fees were. They amounted to ~.0018 BTC more in fees, or ~$220. This is ~.06% of the current 3.125 BTC block reward.
Whole block in question fees were ~0.012 BTC $1,455, so ~ 13% of total fees.CK compared the transaction fees earned from the sub 1 sat/vByte transactions in their block with the block subsidy of 3.125 BTC. It would be better to compare transaction fees earned from sub 1 sat/vByte transactions with transactions paying +1 sat/vByte. That's a better way because it shows how much you earn from those two individual groups. Based on the numbers CK posted, their block was filled to nearly 70% with transactions paying below 1 sat/vByte. Probably that's where most of the fees came from as well.
I told you, the block in question was 910440
https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000d22167aa0c9d1a49e7878631d6c93ea1b1c87b98ba24Total fees 0.012 BTC $1,454
Subsidy + fees 3.137 BTC $371,495
Ck calculated that fees under 1sat/vb were just ~220.
15% (my bad, not 13%) from total fees, and 0.059% of the total reward
Well, in other good news, or is it bad news? Fees of 0.29 are still getting confirmed with 30 blocks of jpgs waiting in the line
I wonder if I should inscribe a block of my own, for as low as $500 per block, to be remembered for ages in the chain.... sounds tempting,
29. Post 65803679 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 02:02:37 CEST 2025) in Sport i Kladionica:
Ja se kasno javljam,zaboravio sam da pitam @Pmalek da li je danas ispratio ovu goleadu? Mislim glupo pitanje,verovatno da jeste
Braca Thuram su se raspucala,a Juventus je pobedio,nisam odgledao ceo mec,vec samo highlights-e. Prijatno me je iznenadio Juventus pogotvo mali crnogorac Adzic, njegov gol me je podsetio na onaj od Vincenta Kompany-a kad su mu vikali "don't shoot"
Napoli i Juventus sad maksimalnim ucinkom po 3 pobede a posebno mi je zanimljivo sto je Rasmus Hojlund dao gol,znaci svako ko ode iz Uniteda postane ozbiljan igrac,bar tako ispada
Dobar trio mi izgleda De Bruyne , Mc Tominay i Hojlund za sada,bice svakako zanimljivo kada se sastanu Napoli i Juve . Sorry na smaranju sa Serijom A,ali verujem da ima nasih koji je prate
30. Post 65803440 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 00:26:49 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
Additionally, cryptofrka, un_rank, and efialtis wrote negative feedback on Fairlay's profile. Again, in my opinion, those are no longer valid. At worst, Fairlay deserves neutral tags but not negative ones if the games involving those clubs are under suspicion to have been manipulated.
No way I'm doing this, it is blatant manipulation by the bookie.
Who allows huge bets on amateur football? Only those that think they can gain something out of it or those that are clueless about the business - and you don't want to deal with either one of those.
Fairlay treated the case in a wrong way since the beginning, we did try to make them understand, they did not communicate well or care at all.
To begin with, they were the ones to allow the player to make a big bet on a shady market. If you take the bet, you honor the bet - end of discussion.
My red is here to stay, at least for now. I will however say that I do believe I've been unfair to Fairlay in a way - many others deserve to be redtagged as well, but I don't usually red the accusation boards. Somebody notified me to read this one and that's why Fairlay is the only one that I've tagged so far.
31. Post 65803102 (unedited backup) (by un_rank) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 22:31:43 CEST 2025) in [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos:
Additionally, ... un_rank, and ... wrote negative feedback on Fairlay's profile. Again, in my opinion, those are no longer valid. At worst, Fairlay deserves neutral tags but not negative ones if the games involving those clubs are under suspicion to have been manipulated.
I will respond here to reiterate the reason for my decision to give a negative tag.
It was completely ridiculous to not grade a bet due to video evidence of the game looking suspicious. I have watched many games in the top flight leagues and seen so many really terrible plays which can sometimes be mistaken for a deliberate act to cost your team the game. If bookies are allowed to refuse to grade a bet and ban a player indefinitely because of a hunch, it sets a bad precedence and gives one more reason players can be cheated out based on the discretion of the website.
As Fairplay mentioned in their own thread, other bookies settled bets on that game even though they had their suspicion (the latter part could be just speculation). They did this because suspicion is not proof. There was not enough evidence at the time to support their decision.
Their conduct in the thread was also very unprofessional. It was clear they were looking to get their decision validated and not a fair arbitration. Their choice of mediators telling them they were in the wrong should normally be enough to get you to reconsider your decision, it was not in this case.
New report of an investigation does not change their early conduct and haste action, so I will not be factoring it into my tag.
I will visit the original thread to check what is the latest update on the case.
- Jay -
32. Post 65802618 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 20:29:07 CEST 2025) in 8. Rujan 2025: NPM Supply-Chain Attack koji srećom nije uspio:
qix je dobio phishing email koji je ličio na poruku NPM korisničke službe nakon čega je resetovao svoju šifru i 2FA i na taj način hakeru dao pristup svom nalogu.
Vecina velikih hakova se desilo nakon sto je neka bitna sifra ukradena. Dakle, svi sigurnosni protokoli, razni layeri a gotovo uvek je najslabija tacka covek i makar i kratka nesmotrenost.
Ovo su se zbilja pametno dosjetili, da generiraju vise adresa i u clipboardu mijenjaju najslicnije. Zato bi uvijek trebalo kontrolirati prve i zadnje cetri brojke/slova, tako slicne adrese napadaci tesko da mogu generirati.
Kako tehnologija bude napredovala, postat će sve lakše i lakše generirati slične adrese. Provjeravati samo nekoliko prvih i zadnjih znakova više nije sigurno. Bolje je steći naviku provjeravati cijelu adresu. Ne oduzima previše vremena. Naročito kod slanja većih iznosa čovjek se sigurnije osjeća.
Da, provera cele adrese bi trebalo biti obavezna.
Ako se dobro secam, i ovde na forumu su neki clanovi nudili generisanje specificnih adresa, pa koliko sam shvatio, prvih par karaktera nije cak ni predstavljalo prevelik problem.
33. Post 65800884 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 12:24:13 CEST 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
23. 14716:
rb1205 (
Trust: neutral) (
17 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 15510:
Mousepotato (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 16248:
SolarSilver (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 18312:
phantastisch (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
363 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 18640:
SebastianJu (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
83 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 18953:
Stemby (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 19971:
-ck (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
672 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 20300:
Otoh (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
246 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 20651:
coblee (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
365 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 22698:
gwillen (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 23092:
malevolent (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
728 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 23324:
Balthazar (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (
362 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 23810:
yxt (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
116 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 24140:
qwk (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
2538 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 25960:
smoothie (
Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (
491 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 27427:
ziomik (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
12 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 27470:
cygan (
Trust: +60 / =2 / -0) (
9901 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 27870:
JoelKatz (
Trust: neutral) (
12 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 29642:
Lincoln6Echo (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
61 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 30964:
Spotswood (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 31288:
John (John K.) (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
236 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 31410:
ercolinux (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 31539:
Michail1 (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
165 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 31931:
Anduck (
Trust: +18 / =2 / -1) (
72 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 33107:
ssateneth (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 33155:
tiCeR (
Trust: neutral) (
501 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 34692:
fronti (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
310 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 34894:
risho (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 35501:
cAPSLOCK (
Trust: neutral) (
5341 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 36455:
picchio (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
120 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 37502:
rdponticelli (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 38894:
SaltySpitoon (
Trust: +23 / =1 / -1) (
1159 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 41175:
infofront (
Trust: neutral) (
2048 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 41911:
BadBear (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
134 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 42189:
eckmar (
Trust: neutral) (
38 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 43172:
mrkent (
Trust: neutral) (6 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 43526:
ocminer (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
245 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 44673:
ninjarobot (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 47656:
P_Shep (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
377 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 48856:
minimalB (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
23 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 49008:
jojo69 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
4168 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
1715 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 52440:
ailikun (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 55122:
DiamondCardz (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
118 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 55503:
squall1066 (
Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (
32 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 57872:
diego1000 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 58711:
Entropy-uc (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 60791:
lassdas (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
508 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 60820:
DannyHamilton (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
4177 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 62955:
odolvlobo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
2655 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 64205:
Carlton Banks (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
2097 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 65034:
dozerz (
Trust: +37 / =1 / -0) (
77 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 65317:
bigtimespaghetti (
Trust: +21 / =0 / -1) (
57 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 65716:
CoinEraser (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1269 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 67210:
Richy_T (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
1614 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 68448:
KonstantinosM (
Trust: neutral) (
263 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 70535:
KWH (
Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (
56 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 71414:
mnightwaffle (
Trust: +13 / =4 / -0) (
14 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 71769:
kelpy (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 73619:
GIANNAT (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 74263:
BG4 (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
24 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 76206:
bertani (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 76216:
Cripto (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 79608:
Flying Hellfish (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
772 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 80081:
hephaist0s (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
34 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 80810:
solosequenosenada (
Trust: neutral) (
292 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 81292:
Stunna (
Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (
280 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 81572:
Milquetoast (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
31 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 81962:
monkeynuts (
Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (
259 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 82709:
Coinfan (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
117 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
2434 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
8322 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 86549:
alexrossi (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
788 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 86948:
Minor Miner (
Trust: neutral) (
44 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
97. 87930:
bitserve (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
1401 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
98. 88912:
600watt (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
1106 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
99. 90255:
Queenvio (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
34 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
100. 91492:
fsm247 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
155 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
101. 93954:
The_Catman (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
102. 94840:
fluffypony (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
60 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
103. 95042:
BigBitz (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
104. 96650:
Guido (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
105. 97179:
joeperry (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
401 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
106. 98986:
TMAN (
Trust: +24 / =1 / -1) (
1308 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
107. 99165:
Searing (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
465 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
108. 99837:
HeRetiK (
Trust: neutral) (
1819 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
109. 102795:
kurious (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
749 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
110. 104297:
kimosan (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
111. 107601:
pmorici (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
112. 107762:
NLNico (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
313 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
113. 107855:
Wed (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
18 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
114. 109325:
mars78 (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (6 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
115. 109430:
TookDk (
Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (
62 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
116. 109754:
emdes (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
117. 110383:
Bytekiller (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
118. 110642:
hanspeter77 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
177 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
119. 111872:
Deathwing (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
329 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
120. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
7980 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
121. 112568:
Adriano (
Trust: neutral) (
88 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
122. 112877:
BitcoinBarrel (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
38 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
123. 115075:
bitwhizz (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
124. 115423:
Micio (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
283 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
125. 120694:
xhomerx10 (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
9230 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
126. 120714:
gdassori (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
127. 120821:
ghibly79 (
Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (6 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
128. 120837:
vizique (
Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (
645 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
129. 121796:
alani123 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
652 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
130. 122882:
klintay (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
32 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
131. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
1558 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
132. 123869:
wttbs (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
109 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
133. 124440:
btct22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
134. 125583:
tokeweed (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
548 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
135. 129764:
Ticked (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
224 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
136. 130358:
c4shm3n (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
137. 130792:
sidehack (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
868 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
138. 131351:
djjacket (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
139. 132212:
dArkjON (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
13 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
140. 133846:
monbux (
Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (
29 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
141. 134226:
Nestade (
Trust: neutral) (
783 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
142. 134378:
Blazed (
Trust: +58 / =1 / -0) (
119 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
143. 136722:
yakuza699 (
Trust: neutral) (
12 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
144. 138541:
nrg1zer (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
145. 138833:
allyouracid (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
292 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
146. 138940:
minifrij (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
269 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
147. 139004:
eneloop (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
40 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
148. 139027:
alp (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
149. 143492:
girino (
Trust: neutral) (
170 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
150. 143551:
johoe (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
195 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
151. 144671:
unick (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
152. 144811:
bittawm (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
87 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
153. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
171 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. Post 65800525 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 09:58:31 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
Why leave $200 worth of BTC in the air and not pocket it when we know where bitcoin is heading in the long-term?
I was indeed surprised to read his explanation:
In light of how ridiculously small the extra fees mined were by accepting these transactions, and the potential for creating a significant number of new UTXOs, I am reversing my decision to mine these transactions.
So he's saying it's worth $220 to keep Bitcoin's blockchain
about 1 MB smaller (until another miner includes them anyway).
35. Post 65800515 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 09:53:32 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
But even if that wasn't the case. Why leave $200 worth of BTC in the air and not pocket it when we know where bitcoin is heading in the long-term?
For greed! This has nothing to do with network security.
This is guys who even if the sat was worth $1000, would say that the minimum value of a transaction should be 1 sat.
Hopefully I mine a block and earn $200 in my wallet. That $200 alone will cover the energy used to mine the block (maybe it's even too much).
But, if you want, I can give you my BTC address, and transfer all the fees to me, for transactions below 1sat/vb.
36. Post 65800265 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 08:13:38 CEST 2025) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2025-09-05_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1757040117 20 5239098.msg54186093 1068464 2590147
1757038524 1 178336.msg65770613 198573 3717499
1757038475 1 178336.msg65770630 198573 223922
1757035098 3 5214672.msg65767490 1852120 3616629
1757035085 3 5214672.msg65767454 1852120 3624576
1757035060 3 5214672.msg65766977 1852120 932931
1757034937 1 5526415.msg65768046 881377 3490661
1757034922 1 5526415.msg65767985 881377 3623127
1757034901 1 5526415.msg65767128 881377 3525178
1757033704 1 5541908.msg65767450 85033 27470
1757033379 1 178336.msg65770589 33156 1027694
1757033286 1 5556300.msg65722151 3516832 3485266
1757033034 2 5556859.msg65732806 355846 65636
1757032438 1 5551724.msg65770511 1825672 2003859
1757031685 4 26136.msg65759501 2143453 85033
1757031674 4 26136.msg65759385 2143453 246367
1757031661 2 26136.msg65758685 2143453 27470
1757031649 2 26136.msg65755265 2143453 1280964
1757031632 2 26136.msg65753304 2143453 3527653
1757031619 1 26136.msg65751791 2143453 1041310
1757031545 2 5541908.msg65767450 2143453 27470
1757031522 4 5541908.msg65468316 2143453 85033
1757030508 1 178336.msg65770485 1027694 372243
1757030330 1 5551724.msg65769137 137185 379487
1757030156 1 178336.msg65770182 223922 35501
1757029793 2 5389999.msg65767688 407174 306213
1757029709 1 178336.msg65767412 372243 28719
1757029701 1 5551724.msg65769137 2003859 379487
1757029039 1 178336.msg65767394 372243 28719
1757028940 1 5558001.msg65767915 995810 3434176
1757028569 2 5558008.msg65768257 407174 306213
1757028559 3 5558008.msg65767992 407174 1097370
1757028489 2 5557924.msg65768687 407174 2654005
1757027285 1 5525931.msg65768505 1422438 3659543
1757027183 1 2929249.msg65764402 1422438 3659543
1757026173 1 5557624.msg65756547 314792 1283017
1757026109 1 5557605.msg65769188 33156 35
1757026094 1 5557830.msg65770263 2893573 2872248
1757026078 1 5557375.msg65770197 33156 11425
1757026072 1 5557830.msg65769440 2893573 305398
1757025157 2 5546899.msg65768523 407174 2654005
1757025112 2 5479666.msg65768664 407174 2654005
1757024997 1 5545813.msg65770106 314792 1265260
1757024936 1 5558022.msg65768379 983960 3654063
1757023888 2 5557830.msg65763255 2872248 2893573
1757023871 4 5557704.msg65764787 33156 2776678
1757023852 2 5557375.msg65768500 11425 844914
1757023830 4 5557704.msg65764180 33156 359716
1757023469 1 5536232.msg65205318 559088 333827
1757022675 1 5552310.msg65644457 954316 970256
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (52 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2642 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 05 Sep 2025 04:41:57 AM CEST,
Xal0lex (
history) sent 20 Merit to
OcTradism (
history) for
Good topics on security and privacy.
On Fri 05 Sep 2025 04:15:24 AM CEST,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
BTCETFInvestor (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 05 Sep 2025 04:14:35 AM CEST,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Biodom (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 05 Sep 2025 03:18:18 AM CEST,
fillippone (
history) sent 3 Merit to
verdinio (
history) for
Re: [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana.
On Fri 05 Sep 2025 03:18:05 AM CEST,
fillippone (
history) sent 3 Merit to
giorgione (
history) for
Re: [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (546 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 7896 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 804 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3725222:
NateShaw (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3725269:
BaronZemodas (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3725289:
rc_monkey (
history) earned: 4 Merit.
3725479:
Djithbit (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
3725649:
BattleDog (
history) earned: 13 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3718798: chesnock
3718904: Paddy man
3718959: neoman602
3719124: Xtraordinarious
3719147: Bridgoro
3719223: lipo135
3719251: wombat328
3719366: devv371
3719370: zyzzyv4
3719408: TypoTonic
3719451: stinger21
3719598: christine_dkim
3719607: noxcoin
3719664: TonStation
3719753: RoE187
3719854: oni_82
3719996: 1grindwhale
3720043: HustleZ
3720141: xParasite
3720204: nameisnotknown
3721426: freebitcovictim
3721432: Dareo
3721552: crowolf
3721588: krems_hive
3721599: Becky Wealth
3722052: Obiene12
3722054: Ton Poker
3722076: EstherBtc
3722095: Skevica22
3722130: User75318
3722745: edroi
3723320: Karl_3000
3723428: bitcoin-safe
3723557: Algahimy2025
3723698: Emikoyumi
3723704: figcapital
3723706: privacyemail
3723796: TokenTikas
3723860: Chenipe
3723928: BitcoinSterilizer
3723969: Hridyansh Labs
3724243: CryptoGraph ADV
3724463: Edelmalz
3724640: Zaposhi.com
3725106: twilighvanquisher
3725222: NateShaw
3725269: BaronZemodas
3725289: rc_monkey
3725479: Djithbit
3725649: BattleDog
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:7896
4:0:804
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:723
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14017:13541
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:290
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1402
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3718798:0:1
3718904:0:6
3718959:0:1
3719124:0:23
3719147:0:23
3719223:0:2
3719251:0:1
3719366:0:4
3719370:0:4
3719408:4:29
3719451:0:3
3719598:0:2
3719607:0:1
3719664:4:9
3719753:2:7
3719854:0:1
3719996:0:1
3720043:2:8
3720141:0:2
3720204:0:5
3721426:0:1
3721432:0:5
3721552:0:2
3721588:0:3
3721599:0:2
3722052:0:1
3722054:4:10
3722076:0:2
3722095:0:2
3722130:0:1
3722745:0:1
3723320:0:3
3723428:6:38
3723557:0:4
3723698:0:2
3723704:0:3
3723706:0:3
3723796:0:5
3723860:0:1
3723928:0:4
3723969:0:1
3724243:0:1
3724463:1:3
3724640:0:1
3725106:0:4
3725222:0:2
3725269:0:1
3725289:0:4
3725479:2:5
3725649:1:13
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50210Sample 1. 18945 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 722 unique users in 10289 transactions
2. 18836 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9961 transactions
3. 18767 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1066 unique users in 10701 transactions
4. 14602 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 473 unique users in 8425 transactions
5. 13541 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1208 unique users in 4838 transactions
6. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
7. 11820 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 674 unique users in 7927 transactions
8. 11183 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 646 unique users in 6406 transactions
9. 10944 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 555 unique users in 4286 transactions
10. 10897 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 587 unique users in 6334 transactions
11. 10840 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 472 unique users in 6079 transactions
12. 9901 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 493 unique users in 5239 transactions
13. 9433 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 552 unique users in 5390 transactions
14. 9230 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 321 unique users in 4715 transactions
15. 8946 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 613 unique users in 4769 transactions
16. 8899 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 502 unique users in 4173 transactions
17. 8755 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 376 unique users in 3106 transactions
18. 8701 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 325 unique users in 3038 transactions
19. 8695 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 424 unique users in 4333 transactions
20. 8364 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 571 unique users in 4777 transactions
21. 8322 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 392 unique users in 4547 transactions
22. 8203 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 442 unique users in 4854 transactions
23. 8122 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 513 unique users in 3764 transactions
24. 8110 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 517 unique users in 4375 transactions
25. 7980 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 554 unique users in 4677 transactions
26. 7896 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 398 unique users in 862 transactions
27. 7546 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 384 unique users in 4010 transactions
28. 7442 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 489 unique users in 4098 transactions
29. 7208 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 446 unique users in 4005 transactions
30. 7060 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 400 unique users in 3619 transactions
31. 6899 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 564 unique users in 4088 transactions
32. 6382 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 365 unique users in 3229 transactions
33. 6374 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 219 unique users in 1618 transactions
34. 6280 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 468 unique users in 3479 transactions
35. 6237 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 270 unique users in 2852 transactions
36. 6190 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 911 unique users in 4013 transactions
37. 6148 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 361 unique users in 3349 transactions
38. 6145 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 616 unique users in 3434 transactions
39. 6008 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2627 transactions
40. 5905 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 402 unique users in 3225 transactions
41. 5896 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 449 unique users in 3310 transactions
42. 5800 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 391 unique users in 3371 transactions
43. 5740 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 212 unique users in 3366 transactions
44. 5739 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 509 unique users in 3364 transactions
45. 5693 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 315 unique users in 2585 transactions
46. 5671 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 186 unique users in 3321 transactions
47. 5341 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 217 unique users in 3020 transactions
48. 5246 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 193 unique users in 3009 transactions
49. 5159 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 408 unique users in 2549 transactions
50. 5062 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 358 unique users in 2412 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50161. 1 Merit received by 1Cryptonutaya1 (#2080901) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50162. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50163. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50164. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50165. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50166. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50167. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50168. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50169. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50170. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50171. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50172. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50173. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50174. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50175. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50176. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50177. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50178. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50179. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50180. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50181. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50182. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50183. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50184. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50185. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50186. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50187. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50188. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50189. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50190. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50191. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50192. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50193. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50194. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50195. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50196. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50197. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50198. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50199. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50200. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50201. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50202. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50203. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50204. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50205. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50206. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50207. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50208. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50209. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50210. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26308Sample 1. 66026 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 872 unique users in 11989 transactions
2. 62595 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2050 unique users in 26626 transactions
3. 62588 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3268 unique users in 16941 transactions
4. 53596 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4316 unique users in 31169 transactions
5. 53518 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3430 unique users in 51380 transactions
6. 43296 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3495 unique users in 30366 transactions
7. 41784 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9151 transactions
8. 40635 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2679 unique users in 14267 transactions
9. 36623 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2813 unique users in 29683 transactions
10. 35773 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2427 unique users in 13243 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 31751 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1540 unique users in 13263 transactions
13. 31025 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1433 unique users in 10106 transactions
14. 26656 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1639 unique users in 6392 transactions
15. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
16. 26319 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1356 unique users in 6554 transactions
17. 25986 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 1969 unique users in 9578 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 20406 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1239 unique users in 8880 transactions
21. 19822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6371 transactions
22. 15765 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1898 unique users in 6382 transactions
23. 15146 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 640 unique users in 5448 transactions
24. 14951 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 715 unique users in 5481 transactions
25. 14829 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1671 unique users in 6930 transactions
26. 14017 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1006 unique users in 1616 transactions
27. 13547 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1254 unique users in 7725 transactions
28. 13513 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1122 unique users in 8416 transactions
29. 13192 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1543 unique users in 3550 transactions
30. 13116 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 503 unique users in 6110 transactions
31. 12998 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1526 unique users in 6555 transactions
32. 12648 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 644 unique users in 3510 transactions
33. 12454 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1300 unique users in 5771 transactions
34. 12201 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1292 unique users in 6950 transactions
35. 12189 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 791 unique users in 4096 transactions
36. 12167 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2882 unique users in 6568 transactions
37. 12136 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1085 unique users in 7307 transactions
38. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
39. 11909 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 793 unique users in 5746 transactions
40. 9983 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 536 unique users in 3895 transactions
41. 9323 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1023 unique users in 5459 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 7911 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 327 unique users in 3244 transactions
45. 7696 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 992 unique users in 3363 transactions
46. 7690 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 924 unique users in 3386 transactions
47. 7289 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 684 unique users in 6545 transactions
48. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
49. 6779 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 554 unique users in 6169 transactions
50. 6582 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 475 unique users in 3741 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26259. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26260. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26261. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26262. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26263. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26264. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26265. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26266. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26267. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26268. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26269. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26270. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26271. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26272. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26273. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26274. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26275. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26276. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26277. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26278. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26279. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26280. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26281. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26282. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26283. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26284. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26285. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26286. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26287. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26288. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26289. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26290. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26291. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26292. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26293. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26294. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26295. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26296. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26297. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26298. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26299. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26300. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26301. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26302. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26303. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26304. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26305. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26306. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26307. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26308. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 303970 (14.26%)
Tuesday 305426 (14.33%)
Wednesday 304672 (14.30%)
Thursday 325655 (15.28%)
Friday 324904 (15.25%)
Saturday 282588 (13.26%)
Sunday 283146 (13.29%)
Total: 2130361
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
37. Post 65798149 (unedited backup) (by Proty) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 17:54:25 CEST 2025) in Crypto owner losses ≈ $1 million after fake job interview:
The story begins with Alexander being approached over X by some token community profile regarding a partnership opportunity. They were interested in working with him and asked him to schedule a call to talk more. They had two meetings over Microsoft Teams, and everything seemed legitimate and done professionally. The first person Alexander spoke to introduced himself as Dan. He had an American accent and was well-spoken. They discussed the future and how they could cooperate because Alex is also a crypto founder. They spoke again two days later. This time, another cofounder joined the meeting to discuss their plans.
This seems to me like a malware infection dropped form Microsoft Teams. They seem to have created some exploit which probably installed a keyloggger and then uploaded the wallet files from his computer to their own system. Perhaps the victim was also running Microsoft Windows because otherwise it would be very difficult to find and exploit an RCE vulnerability in a browser and then use that to attack the OS itself.
They write in this article on how those criminals attacks on their victims
https://www.cryptoninjas.net/news/crypto-hackers-use-fake-job-interviews-to-install-malware/And those method they are using now is somehow effective for those people not aware in this schemes since they might fall from downloading the malwares provided by this hackers.
With this fake job interview scam/hacking still exist people need to be more careful dealing with what they see online also they should learn how to check if the interviewer is legitimate and also the tools they are downloading is safe and doesn't have any malwares inside.
The rate at which cybercrime is increasing is becoming alarming and many people are falling prey to this attack because I believe before this hackers were able to get authorised access to the victim wallet there were vulnerabilities that was detected that makes them to be able to gain access to his bitcoin. So people fail to understand the importance of cyber security, while they need to be very careful in securing there data online. Hackers will always come up with different means of gaining unauthorized access, so cyber security is as important as physical security. I believe the man fails to verify the authencity of whatever those hackers claim to be .
38. Post 65797738 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 15:56:19 CEST 2025) in 8. Rujan 2025: NPM Supply-Chain Attack koji srećom nije uspio:
~
Modifikacije koda su srećom i igrom slučaja otkrivene nakon što je jedan od kompromitovanih paketa javljao grešku. Nakon pregleda, developeri su otkrili sumnjive funkcije i novi kod. Da je to spretnije odrađeno, pitanje je kad bi se kompromitovani paketi otkrili.
Zapravo je taj hack slucajno otkriven jer ga napadaci nisu dobro napisali pa je javljao gresku? Pa ovo je dosta veliki propust, bas me zabrinulo jer imam vecinu portfolia na Metamasku trenutno, a svasta se moglo dogoditi da propust nije otkriven na vrijeme...
Zlonamjerni kod je zapravo bio clipboard malware, kreiran da promjeni adresu na koju žrtva šalje kripto u adresu pod kontrolom hakera. Ovaj malware je tražio i napadao web i softverske novčanike koje koriste JavaScript, kakav je npr. MetaMask za desktop. Ali i neki softverski novčanici od poznatih hardverskih kompanija navodno koriste JavaScript kao što su Ledger Live ili Trezor Suite. Ovo nije potvrđeno i predstavnici svih kompanija i developeri walleta su u većini slučajeve preko X objavili da njihovi softveri nisu kompromitovani niti da koriste izmijenjene pakete.
Malware je koristio poseban algoritam koji je birao adrese koje najviše liče na one adrese na koje su žrtve slale kripto kako bi spriječio da se otkrije.
~
Ovo su se zbilja pametno dosjetili, da generiraju vise adresa i u clipboardu mijenjaju najslicnije. Zato bi uvijek trebalo kontrolirati prve i zadnje cetri brojke/slova, tako slicne adrese napadaci tesko da mogu generirati.
39. Post 65797627 (unedited backup) (by Beparanf) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 15:18:49 CEST 2025) in YEET.com - Crypto's Casino | Casino & Sportsbook | Airdrop | Community Events:
The problem here is that many Telegram scammers aren't even part of the groups in which they scam. Take impersonators for example, who pretend to be group admins or trusted group members. The moment you join or ask a question, you will get contacted over PM by such people who use similar usernames and pictures that group admins do. They will ask if you need help, if you want to invest, join a special group, etc., etc. Their tactics obviously work good enough, otherwise they would abandon the idea.
This happened to me already, and in my first year in crypto back in 2018, I almost believed a scammer.
The scammer was offering some discount in a private deal for an ICO. I Believe this is how they get most people, offering free money or very good deals and discounts.
You’re right, this sneaky bastard usually copy everything from an admin especially the username that typically change a little bit like “o” to “0” and other letter to number changes just to look like he is the real admin.
These scammers is very updated and know everything so they can easily scam anyone that posting problem on the group.
Worst they relentlessly calling if you allow to be called by someone.
40. Post 65797486 (unedited backup) (by ultrloa) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 14:37:55 CEST 2025) in Crypto owner losses ≈ $1 million after fake job interview:
The story begins with Alexander being approached over X by some token community profile regarding a partnership opportunity. They were interested in working with him and asked him to schedule a call to talk more. They had two meetings over Microsoft Teams, and everything seemed legitimate and done professionally. The first person Alexander spoke to introduced himself as Dan. He had an American accent and was well-spoken. They discussed the future and how they could cooperate because Alex is also a crypto founder. They spoke again two days later. This time, another cofounder joined the meeting to discuss their plans.
This seems to me like a malware infection dropped form Microsoft Teams. They seem to have created some exploit which probably installed a keyloggger and then uploaded the wallet files from his computer to their own system. Perhaps the victim was also running Microsoft Windows because otherwise it would be very difficult to find and exploit an RCE vulnerability in a browser and then use that to attack the OS itself.
They write in this article on how those criminals attacks on their victims
https://www.cryptoninjas.net/news/crypto-hackers-use-fake-job-interviews-to-install-malware/And those method they are using now is somehow effective for those people not aware in this schemes since they might fall from downloading the malwares provided by this hackers.
With this fake job interview scam/hacking still exist people need to be more careful dealing with what they see online also they should learn how to check if the interviewer is legitimate and also the tools they are downloading is safe and doesn't have any malwares inside.
41. Post 65797321 (unedited backup) (by stompix) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 13:51:19 CEST 2025) in [Oct 2020] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!:
What are you comparing the below 1 sat/vByte fees with? With transactions with fees that pay 1 sat/vByte and more or with the block subsidy? If it's with the former, then I agree with you. If it's with the latter, then I don't.
It's not me it's CK:
Now that solo ckpool has mined a block with sub 1sat/vB transactions I have data on the reward mined as the result of a low transaction fee period. Of the ~4900 transactions mined in this block, ~3300 were sub 1sat/vB transactions. It took some time to sift through the data of these transactions to determine what the mined fees were. They amounted to ~.0018 BTC more in fees, or ~$220. This is ~.06% of the current 3.125 BTC block reward.
Whole block in question fees were ~0.012 BTC $1,455, so ~ 13% of total fees.
Not necessarily. The network can continue exactly like this, without growing, and will remain profitable and secure.
Well, you can have a
- 2 trillion worth of coins chain protected by a gear that needs 50 million a day to be overpowered
- a 10 trillion worth of coins that is protected by gear needing 60 million a day to be overpowered
Which one feels safer?
I said it many times, you can guard an ice cream shop with a guy, you can guard a Walmart with two armed bodyguards, but I doubt guarding the White House with 3 guys is a good idea.
Anyhow, one thing I'm curious about this mountain of consolidations tx, how many of those are not actual exchnges,casinos,mixers but the same guys that flood the chain with runes?
42. Post 65796972 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 11:39:44 CEST 2025) in YEET.com - Crypto's Casino | Casino & Sportsbook | Airdrop | Community Events:
The problem here is that many Telegram scammers aren't even part of the groups in which they scam. Take impersonators for example, who pretend to be group admins or trusted group members. The moment you join or ask a question, you will get contacted over PM by such people who use similar usernames and pictures that group admins do. They will ask if you need help, if you want to invest, join a special group, etc., etc. Their tactics obviously work good enough, otherwise they would abandon the idea.
This happened to me already, and in my first year in crypto back in 2018, I almost believed a scammer.
The scammer was offering some discount in a private deal for an ICO. I Believe this is how they get most people, offering free money or very good deals and discounts.
43. Post 65796753 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 10:15:38 CEST 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:
Evo u NoToKYC.com signature kampanji kod Little Mouse ima jedno slobodno mjesto.
We have 1x open slot.
ovcijisir je već vidio jer je prva prijava poslje menadžerove objave njegova. Sretno!
Nema obaveze pisanja u gambling temama i dovoljno je napisati 20 postova tjedno. Mislim da će ti @ovcijisir to odgovarati jer si rekao da ti je 30 postova previše.
Hvala ti! Taman sam ujutro isao na Services pogledati i primijetio da se otvorilo mjesto u kampanji
Ova mi se cini bas ok po uvjetima, ne trazi se previse postova tjedno, tko zna mozda upadnem sada... A pisanje u gamblingu mi vise i ne smeta, imam vec o cemu pisati kolliko sam casina isprobao, a i sudjelujem u Sportsbet sponzoriranim ligama od Trofe i Cryptofrke.
44. Post 65796634 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 09:15:50 CEST 2025) in How to make a bitcoin transaction and pay less than 1 sat/vByte:
examples of transactions where individuals engaged in batching
Isn't that what coinjoin does?
45. Post 65796612 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 09:06:13 CEST 2025) in Crypto owner losses ≈ $1 million after fake job interview:
The story begins with Alexander being approached over X by some token community profile regarding a partnership opportunity. They were interested in working with him and asked him to schedule a call to talk more. They had two meetings over Microsoft Teams, and everything seemed legitimate and done professionally. The first person Alexander spoke to introduced himself as Dan. He had an American accent and was well-spoken. They discussed the future and how they could cooperate because Alex is also a crypto founder. They spoke again two days later. This time, another cofounder joined the meeting to discuss their plans.
This seems to me like a malware infection dropped form Microsoft Teams. They seem to have created some exploit which probably installed a keyloggger and then uploaded the wallet files from his computer to their own system. Perhaps the victim was also running Microsoft Windows because otherwise it would be very difficult to find and exploit an RCE vulnerability in a browser and then use that to attack the OS itself.
