Last update: 2026-03-02_Mon_13.24h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

Pmalek receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Pmalek
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none

Username "Pmalek" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66464210 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 13:22:13 CET 2026) in Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian):
Quote from: slackovic on Today at 11:41:30 AM
Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 08:34:45 AM
/snip

I za kraj pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu. slackovic je ponovno na 1. mjestu, katanic97 se ovaj put popeo na 2. dok je Pmalek zadrzao svoje 3. mjesto.

1. slackovic [45]
2. katanic97 [38]

/snip

Ne može nam nitko ništa, jači smo od sudbine!!! Grin Moram priznati da me ovaj rezultat od katanic97 stvarno iznenadio. Mislio sam da ću opet biti daleko ispred svih, ali razlika je samo sedam postova. Ali neka... Meni je bitno da ima aktivnosti u našoj sekciji.

Btw, hvala na analizi Rikafip!
Evo predlog za one koji su dobri u prikupljanju informacija sa foruma.  Cheesy
Ideja je da se napravi neki live chart koji ce u realnom vremenu pratiti duel poput ovog izmedju slackovic i katanic97. Ko zna, mozda bi i neke opklade mogle da budu.


2. Post 66464056 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 12:41:31 CET 2026) in Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian):
Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 08:34:45 AM
/snip

I za kraj pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu. slackovic je ponovno na 1. mjestu, katanic97 se ovaj put popeo na 2. dok je Pmalek zadrzao svoje 3. mjesto.

1. slackovic [45]
2. katanic97 [38]

/snip

Ne može nam nitko ništa, jači smo od sudbine!!! Grin Moram priznati da me ovaj rezultat od katanic97 stvarno iznenadio. Mislio sam da ću opet biti daleko ispred svih, ali razlika je samo sedam postova. Ali neka... Meni je bitno da ima aktivnosti u našoj sekciji.

Btw, hvala na analizi Rikafip!


3. Post 66463838 (unedited backup) (by john_egbert) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 11:21:19 CET 2026) in 🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:29:53 AM
Quote from: xLays on March 01, 2026, 07:21:03 PM
Love how 1win.com gives free balance even if you didn’t make any deposit for the whole month. I know they don’t have monthly and weekly bonuses like stake.com, but on stake.com now if you don’t play, you’ll only receive a few cents like $0.05, even if you’re Platinum 1 (talking about weekly bonus). They sending SMS for this kind of bonus which is really good.

Did any of you also receive this on March 1st? It’s a totally free $3.
That's a strategy to get you to deposit and play with them again. Some casinos do that. If you have played with them in the past and they notice that you haven't been active lately, they will send you a special bonus and a promotion they think you might be interested in.

I have had the same thing happen to me on a sports betting site that I stopped using because I found better offers elsewhere. Their email said something like: "We noticed you haven't log in for a while. Here is a surprise that might change your mind if you decide to come back."

Yep. It's their retention team working.


4. Post 66463767 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 10:59:25 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: SageSwap on February 28, 2026, 11:23:19 AM
Quote from: Pmalek on February 28, 2026, 08:14:50 AM
Quote from: SageSwap on February 27, 2026, 06:09:22 PM
That is why, at SageSwap, every time a new exchange is created, we create a new address to which the user deposits money so that service A cannot be linked to user B.

In the future, we will try to introduce even more obstacles to make it even more difficult to track the transactions we carry out with users.
How easy or difficult do you think it would be for the enemies of private exchanges to connect all or most of your reserves back to you? You have stated that your coin reserves are spread out across different addresses. Are there so many of these addresses that if I were to make 10 swaps, for example, via SageSwap, I would get my crypto from a different address each time?

It depends on the amount. If you exchange small amounts of USDT/USDC, e.g. less than $100, there is a good chance that you will receive money from one of our partners, because even though we operate mostly on our own reserves, we still use partners for small amounts, especially USDT/USDC, so as not to risk: freezing funds or other things.

Quote from: NotATether on February 28, 2026, 09:28:41 AM
Quote from: SageSwap on February 27, 2026, 06:09:22 PM
The biggest problem that seems to be with the introduction of the No AML swap service is the fact that someone could connect us with helping with “launder money" for someone and put us on a sanctions list, e.g. in the USA.

That is why, at SageSwap, every time a new exchange is created, we create a new address to which the user deposits money so that service A cannot be linked to user B.

In the future, we will try to introduce even more obstacles to make it even more difficult to track the transactions we carry out with users.

For deposits exceeding a certain large threshold, like $1,000,000, you can implement an automatic AML check with a fast-updating provider such as MistTrack and just send the coins back if you are uncomfortable with processing them.

Hackers and money launders usually want to convert their coins quickly, so they send large sums. It's how the price of Monero spiked 2x temporarily a few months ago.

Over the last few days, thanks to our AML Mode, we have processed much more than $1 million, and because of this, we have also had some minor technical issues with our mode.

We do not want to deny our users access to the service, and since we have decided not to check AML in this mode, we will not do so.

I like your strategy. It is always good to expand the network with other partners and thus have more flexibility in business, and more available btc addresses for payment.
I believe that these are reliable partners.
If you have already processed more than a million $ in the last few days, this only proves your reliability to your future users and increases trust in your service.
I suggest that you share this information on your website, because it is important information for your potential future users.


5. Post 66463730 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 10:45:25 CET 2026) in Uputstva za koriscenje AI:
Quote from: slackovic on March 01, 2026, 06:47:17 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on March 01, 2026, 04:45:34 PM
Bilo je i vrijeme da se nešto uradi po pitanju AI postova jer ih ima dosta na forumu. Čudi me da administracija Bitcointalk-a nije prije iznijela jasan stav šta misle o takvim postovima. S ovim objašnjenjem od theymos-a, kopiranje AI postova je postalo isto kao i plagiranje iz drugih izvora i drugih osoba. Nije dozvoljeno osim ako se ne navade izvor informacija a čak i tad to ne smije da bude prekomjerno. Baš me zanima koliko strogi će admini biti kad budu razmatrali banovanje korisnika zbog AI plagiranja.

Nisam vidio post ali me zanima kako će netko dokazati da je post napisao AI, a ne čovjek. OK, većina foruma je na engleskom jeziku i postoje alati koji otkrivaju da je tekst napisao AI ali nisam siguran da će ljudi krenuti provjeravati postove i prijavljivati one koje je napisao AI. Kod ostalih jezika (recimo za naše jezike) nisam siguran da uopće postoji alat za otkrivanje AI tekstova.

Što se tiče navođenja izvora, to mi je OK. Slična stvar je i kod nas (barem u Hrvatskoj) što se tiče raznih radova na fakultetima. Sve je OK ako cijeli tekst nije napisala umjetna inteligencija i ako se za dio koji je napisao AI navede izvor.

Ako netko bude koristio AI na pametan način, i ne bude  doslovno kopirao cijeli tekst koji dobije, već ga bude pregledao i uredio prije objavljivanja, i napravi sažetak onoga što dobije od AI, mislim da će adminima i bilo kome drugome biti gotovo nemoguće dokazati da je neki tekst dobiven od AI.
Jedino oni koji se ne budu trudili oko toga, i budu doslovno kopirali cijeli AI tekst koji dobiju (bez provjere informacija jer AI nije savršen i ponekad ''halucinira'') njih neće biti teško otkriti.
Za lokalne jezike teško da će se netko truditi (osim možda ako baš neki lokalni član se odluči potruditi i analizirati neki tekst) jer je teško analizirati prevedeni tekst.
Djeca danas čak i sažetke sastava ili lektira u školi rade pomoću AI i danas je učiteljima, i bilo kome drugome, jako teško to sve pratiti i otkriti AI plagijat.


6. Post 66463608 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 09:43:13 CET 2026) in DefaultTrust changes:
Theymos reshuffled DT1.

Removed:
     1. Staff HostFat (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (301 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. Legendary Vod (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (2551 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. Administrator Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (2522 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. Legendary ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (2568 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. Staff Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (1651 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. Legendary arulbero (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1521 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. Legendary buckrogers (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. Legendary Buchi-88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. Legendary minerjones (Trust: +126 / =0 / -0) (3197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. Hero Member polymerbit (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (1011 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. Legendary Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (1249 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. Copper Member shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (3192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. Copper Member Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3323 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. Legendary Little Mouse (Trust: +44 / =1 / -0) (3446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. Legendary jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. Legendary efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1551 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Added:
     1. Administrator theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (14252 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. Legendary babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (4563 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. Legendary Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (8513 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. Legendary Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (199 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. Legendary cryptodevil (Trust: +10 / =0 / -1) (254 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. Legendary JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (13028 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. Legendary DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (6619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. Legendary zazarb (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. Legendary Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (2069 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. Sr. Member tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (448 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. Legendary JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (1839 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. Legendary sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1171 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. Legendary bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (7292 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. Legendary BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (9407 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. Legendary paid2 (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (3763 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. Hero Member n0nce (Trust: neutral) (6016 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


7. Post 66463592 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Mon Mar 2 09:34:49 CET 2026) in Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian):
Evo i mjesecne analize naseg boarda za Sijecanj, koji dolaze par dana kasnije nego sto sam planirao, i to cisto zbog lijenosti.  Kao i svaki put do sada, pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Sijecanj 2026 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.


Analiza broja postova tijekom Sijecnja 2026

Tijekom Sijecnja napisali smo 235 postova sto je mali pad u odnosu na mjesec ranije, tijekom kojeg je napisano 253 posta, te smo se prakticki vratili na brojke iz Studenog (237) tako da nije nista alarmantno.






Analiza merita za Sijecanj 2026

Mali pad broja postova prati i pad broja podijeljenih merita, tako da smo tijekom Sijecnja podijelili 314 merita, sto nam je ujedno i drugi najbolji rezultat uopce, odmah nakon Prosinca. Ovo bi bila odlicna brojka i da imamo duplo vise posotva, a kamoli ovih 235.




Listu onih koji su podijeli merit ponovno predvodi Pmalek sa 85 merita, dok listu primatelja ponovno predvodi katanic97 sa 92 merita.




Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Sijecnja 2026

I za kraj pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu. slackovic je ponovno na 1. mjestu, katanic97 se ovaj put popeo na 2. dok je Pmalek zadrzao svoje 3. mjesto.

1. slackovic [45]
2. katanic97 [38]
3. Pmalek [20]
4. examplens [19]
5. ovcijisir [16]
6. cryptofrka [16]
7. Daniel91 [15]
8. Trofo [15]
9. Rikafip [15]
10. dkbit98 [9]
11. Joca97 [6]
12. CroBoy12 [3]
13. SirJohnVonSlotty [3]
14. kriptor123 [3]
15. fillippone [2]
16. krpto58 [2]
17. paco92x [2]
18. freigeist [1]
19. btcltcdigger [1]
20. EXMON [1]
21. Bitcoin Store [1]
22. Lunorael [1]
23. NanoSyk [1]


8. Post 66461922 (unedited backup) (by DeeppRockk) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 20:08:13 CET 2026) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:03:40 PM
I don't think so. The prizes on the wheel aren't changing. The 1 BTC wheel has always had the same values since I first saw it. I think the ones requiring connection via Telegram haven't worked in a long time. Did they ever get around fixing that?Even if the prizes are changing, you would always have a biggest reward that you paid out as a win. If you asked me "what's the biggest win you ever got on a casino," it's easy to answer that question with a number. If you remember the number, of course. Even if I win every day, there is always a biggest payout ever at any point in time.


youre looking at the wrong variable. The 1 BTC prize being static is irrelevant; the prize list is just a visual. The wheel's value is its backend probability distribution, which isn't public.

The EV of a spin is fractions of a cent because the probability of hitting 1 BTC is programmed to be near-zero. This isn't a bet, its a mechanism to drive daily logins. Their value is your engagement, your value is the average payout of the tiny BFG wins.
The 1 BTC is marketing to create the illusion of a near miss. its not a game of chance, its a faucet with a flashy UI.


9. Post 66461847 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 19:47:19 CET 2026) in Uputstva za koriscenje AI:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:45:34 PM
Bilo je i vrijeme da se nešto uradi po pitanju AI postova jer ih ima dosta na forumu. Čudi me da administracija Bitcointalk-a nije prije iznijela jasan stav šta misle o takvim postovima. S ovim objašnjenjem od theymos-a, kopiranje AI postova je postalo isto kao i plagiranje iz drugih izvora i drugih osoba. Nije dozvoljeno osim ako se ne navade izvor informacija a čak i tad to ne smije da bude prekomjerno. Baš me zanima koliko strogi će admini biti kad budu razmatrali banovanje korisnika zbog AI plagiranja.

Nisam vidio post ali me zanima kako će netko dokazati da je post napisao AI, a ne čovjek. OK, većina foruma je na engleskom jeziku i postoje alati koji otkrivaju da je tekst napisao AI ali nisam siguran da će ljudi krenuti provjeravati postove i prijavljivati one koje je napisao AI. Kod ostalih jezika (recimo za naše jezike) nisam siguran da uopće postoji alat za otkrivanje AI tekstova.

Što se tiče navođenja izvora, to mi je OK. Slična stvar je i kod nas (barem u Hrvatskoj) što se tiče raznih radova na fakultetima. Sve je OK ako cijeli tekst nije napisala umjetna inteligencija i ako se za dio koji je napisao AI navede izvor.


10. Post 66461794 (unedited backup) (by theymos) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 19:30:25 CET 2026) in DT update log:
This month 111 users were eligible.

Old:
Code:
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
NeuroticFish
achow101
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
RaltcoinsB
igebotz
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
apogio

New:
Code:
theymos
gmaxwell
OgNasty
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Welsh
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
Swordsoffreedom
hybridsole
stompix
hilariousandco
willi9974
cryptodevil
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
Jet Cash
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
AakZaki
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
igebotz
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
sheenshane
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
anonymousminer
Lakai01
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
YOSHIE
inspace
Awaklara
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
paid2
n0nce
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
apogio


11. Post 66461672 (unedited backup) (by virasog) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 18:52:19 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:52:30 PM
Change the way you think about identity verification at crypto casinos. On one side you should put casinos that require KYC and where you know that you will be asked to verify yourself. On the other side, put crypto casinos where you will maybe be required to undergo KYC. That's it.

I wished it were that simple, but unfortunately, it is not. I do not say that all KYC casino aren't scam and all the non-KYC casino are scam but there are some bad fishes and they usually will block the big withdrawals and ask for KYC and then never approve the KYC so that they do not have to process the withdrawals. This way they keep running the casino, process small withdrawals and use KYC as a tool to scam selectively.  Sad

That is the reason some people prefer to do KYC early one after making the account even on the Non-KYC casino to avoid such issues. But yeah the scam casino can still stop your withdrawals even if we have KYC passed.


12. Post 66461121 (unedited backup) (by icopress) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 15:51:19 CET 2026) in 🏆 Crypto Community Award - Discussion:
Hi all! I've blocked the thread.

1. The results will be announced within a week or two.
2. There will be 20 prizes of $150 each.
3. Each user has been assigned a number of slots in the raffle (we will use the system suggested by examplens).


Code:
criptoevangelista
Pablo-wood
DaNNy001
Donneski
Obulis


Code:
icopress (2 slots)
SamReomo (10 slots).
Karl_3000 (10 slots).
Barikui1 (7 slots).
SatoPrincess (10 slots)
Su-asa (7 slots).
Nathrixxx (7 slots).
rachael9385 (8 slots).
adultcrypto (10 slots).
Bigjoe33 (8 slots).
bitmover (9 slot).
NeuroticFish (7 slots).
Dreadboost (10 slots).
MorganaX (9 slots).
justinlamode (10 slots).
Victorybit1 (8 slots).
Jaycoinz (8 slots).
TryNinja (10 slots).
Floczy (10 slots).
zasad@ (5 slots).
Satofan44 (3 slots).
apogio (6 slots).
*Ace* (6 slots).
m2017 (6 slots).
lovesmayfamilis (6 slots).
AprilioMP (3 slots).
MAAManda (4 slots).
Tmoonz (4 slots).
bangjoe (6 slots).
BABY SHOES (5 slots).
Lillominato89 (7 slots).
babo (7 slots).
LFC_Bitcoin (7 slots).
Fivestar4everMVP (4 slots).
Ojima-ojo (3 slots).
GeorgeJohn (6 slots).
Bright0515 (6 slots).
Btcdeybodi (10 slots).
Sexylizzy2813 (6 slots).
giorgione (4 slots).
Lida93 (8 slots).
bitbollo (10 slots).
bastisisca (5 slots).
MainIbem (2 slots).
The Sceptical Chymist (10 slot).
verdinio (4 slots).
Majestic-milf (9 slots).
pewboy (5 slots).
m4r1o (5 slots).
KingsDen (5 slots).
changaa (5 slots).
bubilas (10 slots).
summonerrk (9 slots).
cande86 (3 slots).
xenomorfo (5 slots).
Tinubu (10 slots).
Pmalek (10 slots).
promise444c5 (7 slots).
imthegreat (7 slots).
Woodie (6 slots).
Rockstarguy (1 slots).
examplens (10 slots).
banana33 (5 slots).
sabotag3x (4 slots).
dollyamo (4 slots).
Wakate (4 slots).
martinom (3 slots).
blomen (8 slots).
Peanutswar (8 slots).
kennycryptoitalia (4 slots).
GiftedMAN (6 slots).
aipercoin (3 slots).
fluffaloo (5 slots).
Wake Up (4 slots).
nutildah (6 slots).
TypoTonic (10 slots).
Obim34 (10 slots).
EFS (5 slots).
joker_josue (13 slots).
sotelorene (8 slots).
d5000 (10 slots).
dkbit98 (10 slots).
ABCbits (7 slots).
famososMuertos (8 slots).
Sir_Garry55 (8 slots).
Odohu (10 slots).
Foxpup (9 slots).
Perfectbaby (8 slots).
notblox1 (10 slots).
obuoma (10 slots).
Mhizlove (5 slots).
fillippone (10 slots).
AakZaki (10 slots).
Yablee0 (8 slots).
PowerGlove (10 slots).
LoyceV (9 slots).
Porfirii (9 slots).
taufik123 (10 slots).
bestcandy (10 slots).
Luzin (9 slots).
safar1980 (5 slots).
Etranger (10 slots).
xLays (4 slots).
holydarkness (14 slots).
W Jr. (6 slots).
Mustang Shelby (5 slots).
Rikafip (10 slots).
katanic97 (10 slots).
JollyGood (14 slots).
Fiatless (10 slots).
GazetaBitcoin (10 slots).
inspace (10 slots).
Forsyth Jones (10 slots).
Mia Chloe (9 slots).
Pjcr7 (2 slots).

I also have 10 places because I voted, and I want to give 8 of my slots to the following posts because I consider them the most comprehensive (holydarkness, JollyGood), that is, I will keep 2 slots for myself.


13. Post 66459581 (unedited backup) (by Rruchi man) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 00:29:55 CET 2026) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
Quote from: Fivestar4everMVP on February 22, 2026, 11:49:05 PM
10 dogecoin is something but I honestly don't think it deserved that congrats applaud 😊 because it's not even worth up to a dollar, 10 dogecoins is around $0.9 based on current rate if I am not mistaken.
Maybe the excitement is more about the possibility that maybe one day a gambler on the BetFury wheel will spin for free and win a big prize that has some real value.

Quote from: Pmalek on February 26, 2026, 04:40:48 PM
I asked BetFury before what were the top prizes they paid out since they introduced their lucky wheel. I never got an answer to that question. I won their native token a few times and some SHIB. Nothing of great value, though.

Could it be possible that you did not get an answer because they are constantly updating what the top prizes are? Just a thought.


14. Post 66459535 (unedited backup) (by UmerIdrees) (scraped on Sun Mar 1 00:13:49 CET 2026) in Seeking Business Co-Founder for Political Crypto Project:
Quote from: Pmalek on January 29, 2026, 08:23:52 AM
It makes more sense to tell the community what the project is really about than asking people to contact you in private just to find out more about it. By sharing the basics, you will at least get rid of DMs asking for more information and wasting both your time and theirs if they find out it's not something they want to participate in.

He's here only to get money from the people who will DM him about the project. I don't know why everyone thinks that they will just come up with NO idea and people will start believing in them and also start to invest in the project that has no value and hasn't even started.

Every now and then, the newbies try their luck here on project development section and hardly we find any sensible project here except people begging to invest in their scam business ideas.


15. Post 66459127 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 22:10:55 CET 2026) in Re:
It was hard work selecting the members below, these are sincere votes. Some I've had in mind for a while, as I've spent more time with them. I would like to nominate more members, but unfortunately I can only vote for 3 in each category. But know that you are all incredible!!!

Here are my nominations:

Code:
Hero of Good: HI-TEC99, HCP, Pmalek
HI-TEC99: I will never forget this user, he was one of the first to be very helpful to me, assisting me throughout the process of decrypting the Bitcoin Wallet Android wallet backup (schildbatch wallet). That's where my journey on the forum began. He is no longer active, I hope he is well!

HCP: This is another member who helped me a lot in the early days to solve the same problem above. Yes, it took me weeks or months to fully understand what I was doing wrong. He is also inactive, he also deserves a tribute.

Pmalek: He and I are involved in almost all technical discussions and we almost always interact with each other. I'm impressed by his technique and precision in suggesting or solving problems.

Code:
Forum Ninja: ABCbits, vapourminer, LoyceV

ABCbits: This guy is really cool, I really enjoy reading his posts, most are precise and technical, plus I come across him in most of the forum discussions and boards (that I participate in). I like him a lot.

vapourminer: I don't know who he is, but he's a mysterious guy and I think he has a strong presence on the forum. I see him more as an observer (although I consider myself one too), anyway, he has his ninja style.

LoyceV: I can't forget this guy, good presence on the forum, always involved in technical discussions, and if I'm not mistaken, he's the type of guy who posts something philosophical, anyway, always helping newbies and experienced users.

Code:
Bitcoin Geek: nc50lc, dkbit98, TryNinja
nc50lc: What can I say about this guy? He usually always understands the technical context of a discussion and almost always proposes a solution to your problem.

dkbit98: I like reading his posts, he has a lot of knowledge to share and I always see him suggesting solutions, his pow is comprehensive and with a good argument, technical and precise in the subjects.

TryNinja: Whenever I remember bitlist.co I will remember him, he is a very present guy and has a lot of knowledge to share, he contributed a lot developing tools like bitlist.co for the forum, he is an excellent programmer.

Code:
Best Event: Bitcoin Pizza Day 2025
Guys, I love pizzas, I think it was the best recipe I know, so the nomination couldn't be anything else. Just seeing the participants' pizzas makes me hungry...

Code:
Best Project: splash.tf
My vote goes to them because I really like the project and I'm confident it has a lot of room to grow on the forum. After eXch. shut down, I didn't see any other free-kyc exchanges, it was after its emergence that other services with similar proposals reappeared. May privacy always prevail!

Code:
Discovery of the Year: mikel_012
He is a very kind member of our community, always involved with political and philosophical discussions. I was impressed by his development on the forum. I don't remember exactly when I noticed him, but in a short time he reached the Hero rank! Well done!

Code:
Help Buster: Mia Chloe, DdmrDdmr
Mia Chloe: This year I'm putting her in this category. She's a dear friend of mine and I enjoy reading her posts whenever  I come across her amidst the forum discussions.

DdmrDdmr: What I have to say about him is that he does a great job on Bitcointalk on Meta, always cataloging members in his posts who are close to reaching the next rank, which helps identify members who are gaining traction and space in the forum. He always recognizes good posts that deserve plenty of merits.

Code:
Craft Master: Hhampuz, icopress, AB de Royse777
Hhampuz: He is one of the most respected managers on the forum and a very honest guy. I've never had any problems working with him, he's a really cool guy, I like him.

icopress: He is also one of the most respected managers on the forum, honest, and he's already offered to solve a problem I had. He's a very helpful and really nice guy.

AB de Royse777: I've had the pleasure of working on some of his campaigns. You can see that he has a lot of professionalism and passion for what he does. He's an indispensable member of the forum. Very honest. Anyway, all the people listed in this category share the same level of professionalism, honesty are friendly.

Code:
Local Hero: bitmover, sabotag3x, rdluffy

bitmover: Bitmover is a sincere guy, great at giving suggestions and and has a lot of knowledge. He participates in almost all discussions in our board community.

sabotag3x: He's a guy I've known since my early days on the forum. He's one of the oldest users on our board, always posting and sharing knowledge in our community.

rdluffy: He's a sincere guy, always helpful, and always sharing his knowledge, he's a very friendly guy.

Code:
Miss Bitcointalk: Mindyspace
Mindyspace is an amazing woman and also a recent discovery on this forum. She's gradually gaining recognition, makes great posts, and I interact with her whenever I can. She has everything it takes to become a Legendary, and I hope she stays with us for a long time.


16. Post 66458599 (unedited backup) (by Jorjorjo1234) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 19:10:55 CET 2026) in Duckdice.io and Tower.bet They closed my account due to suspicious activity:
Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 05:20:12 PM
Quote from: Jorjorjo1234 on Today at 05:10:42 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:27:43 PM
DuckDice and Tower.bet are operated by the same people. My guess is they use the same sports betting provider as well. If I were you, I wouldn't deposit anything else into that DuckDice account you have. Maybe they are waiting for you to do that so they can confiscate your money.

If they are accusing you of value betting, it means that they believe that you took (systematic) advantage of higher odds on their website than they were elsewhere. This can be in pre-match or live betting. If the odds of an outcome are higher than the likelihood of that outcome happening, it's considered a 'value bet.' If all or most of your betting history consists of such bets, the bookie probably sees that as an unfair way of playing.

I don't necessarily agree with that, but that's the way it is. I think that if they offer odds of X, they should also pay out all winnings players make betting on those odds. What's the point in offering them if you can get in trouble betting on them. If it was the other way around, and the bookies offered too low odds on an outcome, they sure as hell wouldn't cancel bets and refund players.

I placed games mostly on big market or esports matches, I checked the sport provider, it is Betby sportsbook.

I think it is not fair, they can ban my account and refund my balance, but cannot do it on that way lol.

It is a common practice amongst casino to return your initial depo if you're in the minus PnL or to return nothing if your overall PnL is in the green side. They're here to be fair, to pay what is won fairly and return what's not belong to them [suppose you're in PnL negative, thus eligible for initial depo]. Again, if you're willing for me to be your eyes and see evidences they have for you [very much likely it'll be under for-my-eyes-only], kindly provide your login details to me, you can PM me that if you prefer the info to be private, I'll reach my contact come Monday to consult with them regarding your issue.

Im sure there no evidences


17. Post 66458550 (unedited backup) (by Jorjorjo1234) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 18:59:13 CET 2026) in Duckdice.io and Tower.bet They closed my account due to suspicious activity:
Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 04:48:14 PM
As Pmalek mentioned, DuckDice and Tower are sister-casino. That said, I have their contact in my hand. Do you mind to inform me your username or email address or other login details? I think I can kill two birds with one representative, namely get them to look at your Tower's case, and then get them to peek at their sister's system and see your case there too.

Hello, thank you
username: jorjorjo123

sorry for the late reply, there is a 360 second lock for each reply


18. Post 66458479 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 18:38:25 CET 2026) in Duckdice.io and Tower.bet They closed my account due to suspicious activity:
Quote from: Jorjorjo1234 on Today at 05:10:42 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:27:43 PM
DuckDice and Tower.bet are operated by the same people. My guess is they use the same sports betting provider as well. If I were you, I wouldn't deposit anything else into that DuckDice account you have. Maybe they are waiting for you to do that so they can confiscate your money.

If they are accusing you of value betting, it means that they believe that you took (systematic) advantage of higher odds on their website than they were elsewhere. This can be in pre-match or live betting. If the odds of an outcome are higher than the likelihood of that outcome happening, it's considered a 'value bet.' If all or most of your betting history consists of such bets, the bookie probably sees that as an unfair way of playing.

I don't necessarily agree with that, but that's the way it is. I think that if they offer odds of X, they should also pay out all winnings players make betting on those odds. What's the point in offering them if you can get in trouble betting on them. If it was the other way around, and the bookies offered too low odds on an outcome, they sure as hell wouldn't cancel bets and refund players.

I placed games mostly on big market or esports matches, I checked the sport provider, it is Betby sportsbook.

I think it is not fair, they can ban my account and refund my balance, but cannot do it on that way lol.
Many of the Betby books are shady. If you like the odds stick to 500.casino or Roobet.


19. Post 66458429 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 18:20:14 CET 2026) in Duckdice.io and Tower.bet They closed my account due to suspicious activity:
Quote from: Jorjorjo1234 on Today at 05:10:42 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:27:43 PM
DuckDice and Tower.bet are operated by the same people. My guess is they use the same sports betting provider as well. If I were you, I wouldn't deposit anything else into that DuckDice account you have. Maybe they are waiting for you to do that so they can confiscate your money.

If they are accusing you of value betting, it means that they believe that you took (systematic) advantage of higher odds on their website than they were elsewhere. This can be in pre-match or live betting. If the odds of an outcome are higher than the likelihood of that outcome happening, it's considered a 'value bet.' If all or most of your betting history consists of such bets, the bookie probably sees that as an unfair way of playing.

I don't necessarily agree with that, but that's the way it is. I think that if they offer odds of X, they should also pay out all winnings players make betting on those odds. What's the point in offering them if you can get in trouble betting on them. If it was the other way around, and the bookies offered too low odds on an outcome, they sure as hell wouldn't cancel bets and refund players.

I placed games mostly on big market or esports matches, I checked the sport provider, it is Betby sportsbook.

I think it is not fair, they can ban my account and refund my balance, but cannot do it on that way lol.

It is a common practice amongst casino to return your initial depo if you're in the minus PnL or to return nothing if your overall PnL is in the green side. They're here to be fair, to pay what is won fairly and return what's not belong to them [suppose you're in PnL negative, thus eligible for initial depo]. Again, if you're willing for me to be your eyes and see evidences they have for you [very much likely it'll be under for-my-eyes-only], kindly provide your login details to me, you can PM me that if you prefer the info to be private, I'll reach my contact come Monday to consult with them regarding your issue.


20. Post 66458423 (unedited backup) (by The Sceptical Chymist) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 18:19:07 CET 2026) in Why I wouldn't buy Ledger Nano S ever again?:
Quote from: Pmalek on January 06, 2026, 04:46:54 PM
Quote from: rdluffy on January 06, 2026, 12:15:44 PM
<snip>
I know that some countries' laws require them to store the data, but this is extremely dangerous
It's not as easy as that. There are numerous laws that govern how companies are supposed to treat your data and the purposes why they store it. Ledger is based in France. They are required to comply with EU data protection laws. On top of that, there are also various French laws that the company must respect. One of those concerns taxes, accounting, invoicing, and the like. I think that particular law requires French companies to keep customer data for up to 10 years. So even if your personal data that they keep for other purposes can be deleted, the tax & accounting law requires domestic companies to keep your data for a very long time.

It's disgusting, because a conversation like this shouldn't even be ongoing when it comes to any hardware wallet.  The only reason (AFAIK) that data retention and the like are being fretted about in this section is because of Ledger's chicanery with their Recover rollout.  When you buy a hardware wallet, there's no reason you should be handing over any personal data to the manufacturer--and Jesus, if there is then fuck HW wallets altogether.  Electrum works just fine and if cold storage is needed, it's easy-peasy to etch that seed phrase down right along the barrel of your gun.

I've been asking myself for a long time if there are any honest people in crypto.  Seems like eventually almost everyone scams, lies, or does something to screw someone over.  Perhaps not the average users, but the ones who own exchanges, make wallets, get air time so they can influence people for their own personal gain....ugh, it's so frustrating and has not gotten better with time.


21. Post 66458385 (unedited backup) (by Jorjorjo1234) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 18:10:43 CET 2026) in Duckdice.io and Tower.bet They closed my account due to suspicious activity:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:27:43 PM
DuckDice and Tower.bet are operated by the same people. My guess is they use the same sports betting provider as well. If I were you, I wouldn't deposit anything else into that DuckDice account you have. Maybe they are waiting for you to do that so they can confiscate your money.

If they are accusing you of value betting, it means that they believe that you took (systematic) advantage of higher odds on their website than they were elsewhere. This can be in pre-match or live betting. If the odds of an outcome are higher than the likelihood of that outcome happening, it's considered a 'value bet.' If all or most of your betting history consists of such bets, the bookie probably sees that as an unfair way of playing.

I don't necessarily agree with that, but that's the way it is. I think that if they offer odds of X, they should also pay out all winnings players make betting on those odds. What's the point in offering them if you can get in trouble betting on them. If it was the other way around, and the bookies offered too low odds on an outcome, they sure as hell wouldn't cancel bets and refund players.

I placed games mostly on big market or esports matches, I checked the sport provider, it is Betby sportsbook.

I think it is not fair, they can ban my account and refund my balance, but cannot do it on that way lol.


22. Post 66458299 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 17:48:19 CET 2026) in Duckdice.io and Tower.bet They closed my account due to suspicious activity:
As Pmalek mentioned, DuckDice and Tower are sister-casino. That said, I have their contact in my hand. Do you mind to inform me your username or email address or other login details? I think I can kill two birds with one representative, namely get them to look at your Tower's case, and then get them to peek at their sister's system and see your case there too.


23. Post 66457541 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 13:18:07 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
    11. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 12089: piotr_n (Trust:  neutral) (441 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 13813: smooth (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 14716: rb1205 (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 15510: Mousepotato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 16248: SolarSilver (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 18595: 2weiX (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (7 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 18640: SebastianJu (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (83 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 18953: Stemby (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 19971: -ck (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 20300: Otoh (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 20651: coblee (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (365 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 22698: gwillen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 23092: malevolent (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (728 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 23810: yxt (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 24140: qwk (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (2540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 25960: smoothie (Trust: +30 / =1 / -0) (495 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 27427: ziomik (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (12 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 27470: cygan (Trust: +62 / =2 / -0) (10878 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 27870: JoelKatz (Trust:  neutral) (12 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 29642: Lincoln6Echo (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (63 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 30964: Spotswood (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 31288: John (John K.) (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (236 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 31410: ercolinux (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 31539: Michail1 (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (165 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 33107: ssateneth (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 33155: tiCeR (Trust:  neutral) (504 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 34692: fronti (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (310 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 34894: risho (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 35501: cAPSLOCK (Trust:  neutral) (6255 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 36455: picchio (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (120 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 37502: rdponticelli (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 38894: SaltySpitoon (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 41175: infofront (Trust:  neutral) (2095 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 41911: BadBear (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 43172: mrkent (Trust:  neutral) (6 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 43526: ocminer (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 44673: ninjarobot (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 47656: P_Shep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (408 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 48856: minimalB (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 49008: jojo69 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (4300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 51478: mezzomix (Trust:  neutral) (309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 52440: ailikun (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 55122: DiamondCardz (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 55503: squall1066 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 57872: diego1000 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 58711: Entropy-uc (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 60791: lassdas (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (511 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 60820: DannyHamilton (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (4359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 62955: odolvlobo (Trust:  neutral) (2747 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 64205: Carlton Banks (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2100 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 65034: dozerz (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 65636: babo (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (4554 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 65716: CoinEraser (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 67210: Richy_T (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1845 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 68448: KonstantinosM (Trust:  neutral) (263 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 70535: KWH (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (82 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 71414: mnightwaffle (Trust: +13 / =4 / -0) (14 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 71769: kelpy (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 73619: GIANNAT (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 74263: BG4 (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 76216: Cripto (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 79608: Flying Hellfish (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 80081: hephaist0s (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (34 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 80810: solosequenosenada (Trust:  neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 81572: Milquetoast (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 81962: monkeynuts (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (259 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 82709: Coinfan (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 86549: alexrossi (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (809 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 86948: Minor Miner (Trust:  neutral) (95 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 87930: bitserve (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1522 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 88912: 600watt (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 90255: Queenvio (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 93954: The_Catman (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    97. 94840: fluffypony (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    98. 95042: BigBitz (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    99. 97179: joeperry (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (451 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   100. 98986: TMAN (Trust: +22 / =1 / -1) (1308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   101. 99165: Searing (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (821 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   102. 99837: HeRetiK (Trust:  neutral) (1821 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   103. 102795: kurious (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (749 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   104. 103764: Evilish (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (64 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   105. 104297: kimosan (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   106. 107601: pmorici (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   107. 107762: NLNico (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (313 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   108. 107855: Wed (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (18 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   109. 109430: TookDk (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (62 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   110. 110383: Bytekiller (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   111. 110642: hanspeter77 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   112. 111872: Deathwing (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (329 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   113. 112493: Pmalek (Trust:  neutral) (8494 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   114. 112568: Adriano (Trust:  neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   115. 115075: bitwhizz (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   116. 115423: Micio (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   117. 120694: xhomerx10 (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (9802 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   118. 120714: gdassori (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   119. 120821: ghibly79 (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (6 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   120. 120837: vizique (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   121. 121796: alani123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   122. 122882: klintay (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   123. 123869: wttbs (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (109 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   124. 124440: btct22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   125. 125583: tokeweed (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (600 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   126. 129764: Ticked (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   127. 130358: c4shm3n (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   128. 130792: sidehack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (871 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   129. 131351: djjacket (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   130. 133846: monbux (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (29 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   131. 134226: Nestade (Trust:  neutral) (783 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   132. 134378: Blazed (Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   133. 136722: yakuza699 (Trust:  neutral) (13 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   134. 138541: nrg1zer (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   135. 138940: minifrij (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (269 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   136. 139004: eneloop (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (40 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   137. 139027: alp (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


24. Post 66457444 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 12:23:19 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:14:50 AM
Quote from: SageSwap on February 27, 2026, 06:09:22 PM
That is why, at SageSwap, every time a new exchange is created, we create a new address to which the user deposits money so that service A cannot be linked to user B.

In the future, we will try to introduce even more obstacles to make it even more difficult to track the transactions we carry out with users.
How easy or difficult do you think it would be for the enemies of private exchanges to connect all or most of your reserves back to you? You have stated that your coin reserves are spread out across different addresses. Are there so many of these addresses that if I were to make 10 swaps, for example, via SageSwap, I would get my crypto from a different address each time?

It depends on the amount. If you exchange small amounts of USDT/USDC, e.g. less than $100, there is a good chance that you will receive money from one of our partners, because even though we operate mostly on our own reserves, we still use partners for small amounts, especially USDT/USDC, so as not to risk: freezing funds or other things.

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 09:28:41 AM
Quote from: SageSwap on February 27, 2026, 06:09:22 PM
The biggest problem that seems to be with the introduction of the No AML swap service is the fact that someone could connect us with helping with “launder money" for someone and put us on a sanctions list, e.g. in the USA.

That is why, at SageSwap, every time a new exchange is created, we create a new address to which the user deposits money so that service A cannot be linked to user B.

In the future, we will try to introduce even more obstacles to make it even more difficult to track the transactions we carry out with users.

For deposits exceeding a certain large threshold, like $1,000,000, you can implement an automatic AML check with a fast-updating provider such as MistTrack and just send the coins back if you are uncomfortable with processing them.

Hackers and money launders usually want to convert their coins quickly, so they send large sums. It's how the price of Monero spiked 2x temporarily a few months ago.

Over the last few days, thanks to our AML Mode, we have processed much more than $1 million, and because of this, we have also had some minor technical issues with our mode.

We do not want to deny our users access to the service, and since we have decided not to check AML in this mode, we will not do so.


25. Post 66456991 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 08:50:43 CET 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-02-20_Fri_05.18h)


theymos' raw data (format: time    amount    msg    user_from    user_to)
Sample
Code:
1771554970 1 5268108.msg66424226 252510 2836461
1771552752 1 5575051.msg66425980 3558380 3597964
1771550998 3 5571692.msg66300695 3625271 3456305
1771550716 1 178336.msg66427433 120694 18321
1771550678 1 178336.msg66427166 120694 33156
1771550652 1 5275303.msg66427382 1016855 1045971
1771550343 2 5394559.msg66418272 123824 950662
1771550314 1 5573932.msg66423849 3745932 521899
1771550303 1 5573932.msg66423646 3745932 1059082
1771548488 1 5574695.msg66427295 33156 3594163
1771548444 1 5574214.msg66426092 33156 3678238
1771547985 1 5575011.msg66427419 33156 2729230
1771547484 1 5575088.msg66427456 2776678 3483703
1771547473 1 5568613.msg66426268 1265260 1856852
1771547466 1 5575088.msg66427414 2776678 1031572
1771547384 1 5575088.msg66427442 3483703 2776678
1771546500 1 178336.msg66427166 18321 33156
1771546295 1 5573645.msg66377787 3735576 3466646
1771546259 1 5574358.msg66422140 3735576 810882
1771546234 1 5574358.msg66420099 3735576 1269701
1771546146 1 5523695.msg66376817 1593137 2850161
1771546130 1 5523695.msg66422328 1593137 85033
1771545183 9 178336.msg66424124 1067333 169384
1771545118 11 178336.msg66423957 1067333 379487
1771545069 20 178336.msg66423573 1067333 67210
1771545058 1 5574859.msg66420746 18321 2337246
1771545051 1 5251894.msg66384141 33156 2744352
1771545048 1 5574859.msg66424050 18321 2337246
1771545008 20 178336.msg66421651 1067333 533583
1771544982 20 178336.msg66422255 1067333 379487
1771544928 10 178336.msg66421095 1067333 33156
1771544899 10 178336.msg66420343 1067333 252510
1771544873 10 178336.msg66420080 1067333 67210
1771544844 10 178336.msg66419951 1067333 64507
1771544831 10 178336.msg66419926 1067333 128156
1771544811 5 178336.msg66419813 1067333 35501
1771544771 10 178336.msg66419739 1067333 252510
1771544761 10 178336.msg66419675 1067333 223922
1771544345 1 5574773.msg66417525 1012655 2739424
1771544316 1 5575026.msg66425221 1247226 1832947
1771544077 2 5284830.msg66423234 85033 1593137
1771543897 1 3664755.msg66419896 1827294 938833
1771543659 2 5546090.msg66424293 85033 3291025
1771543465 2 5284830.msg66408573 85033 1593137
1771543383 1 178336.msg66423596 2393114 67210
1771543172 1 5571375.msg66413101 33156 3513442
1771542875 1 5487753.msg66426055 252510 3586390
1771542477 1 178336.msg66426667 2393114 3733364
1771542418 1 178336.msg66426942 2393114 35501
1771542069 2 5573542.msg66401502 3547940 3730340
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (55 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2700 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 20 Feb 2026 03:36:10 AM CET, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Free Market Capitalist (history) for Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’.
On Fri 20 Feb 2026 02:59:12 AM CET, Mia Chloe (history) sent 1 Merit to legiteum (history) for Bitcoin Whale Theory v1.0.
On Fri 20 Feb 2026 02:29:58 AM CET, Mr_Brilliant$ (history) sent 3 Merit to Somegory (history) for I choose peace &#128330;&#65039;.
On Fri 20 Feb 2026 02:25:16 AM CET, xhomerx10 (history) sent 1 Merit to OgNasty (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking &amp; discussion.
On Fri 20 Feb 2026 02:24:38 AM CET, xhomerx10 (history) sent 1 Merit to vapourminer (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking &amp; discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking &amp; discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (578 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8390 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 878 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3747640: Mark00101 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3747701: JonasKernDE (history) earned: 6 Merit.
3747726: Spicoli (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3747820: statumx (history) earned: 3 Merit.
3747917: billy.grabow (history) earned: 2 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample
Code:
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3743655: ZaynOsmanAli
3743712: Grease5000
3743791: Dimazdan
3743800: MagnificentX
3743918: Temnayanoch
3743964: melina710
3743974: banktobtc
3744238: Lal_bitcoin
3744348: FiatSystemHater2009
3744376: Abdullah6969
3744379: Vihaanraviii
3744432: Akuma_
3744448: JANEEY555
3744480: WeLiveCrypto
3744506: ModuloMadBTC
3744519: Paney_Thrill
3744614: Coldstreak
3744691: Antikyc_
3744714: lukezio
3744763: topcaz
3744888: khbinversion
3744958: Invariant Core
3745143: Vaeldraux
3745203: cephalopod
3745458: goblintester
3745512: Decimetre
3745514: HighwayLost81
3745612: cLoazyL
3745615: viruz06
3745624: rishib
3745871: Lethobios
3745932: jasonstacks
3746105: Dicey12
3746177: wavelife1
3746196: LUSUBY
3746294: tcatm2
3746381: flowingcapital
3746429: Tete130
3746499: kazikbalaganiarz
3746729: evgpokrow
3746827: rony_btc
3746871: xdxiug
3747260: Glum_Climate_5517
3747467: Dollartree
3747543: jinx_22
3747640: Mark00101
3747701: JonasKernDE
3747726: Spicoli
3747820: statumx
3747917: billy.grabow
Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample
Code:
0:569:0
3:0:8390
4:0:878
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:773
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14273:14216
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:301
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1462
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3743655:0:2
3743712:0:1
3743791:0:2
3743800:0:6
3743918:0:1
3743964:0:4
3743974:0:12
3744238:3:7
3744348:1:2
3744376:0:1
3744379:0:2
3744432:5:46
3744448:0:1
3744480:0:35
3744506:0:9
3744519:0:2
3744614:6:12
3744691:0:2
3744714:0:1
3744763:0:1
3744888:0:5
3744958:0:2
3745143:0:7
3745203:0:3
3745458:1:14
3745512:0:1
3745514:0:11
3745612:0:5
3745615:0:1
3745624:0:8
3745871:0:4
3745932:2:6
3746105:0:1
3746177:0:1
3746196:1:4
3746294:0:10
3746381:0:5
3746429:0:2
3746499:0:1
3746729:0:2
3746827:0:1
3746871:0:3
3747260:0:9
3747467:0:1
3747543:0:6
3747640:0:1
3747701:0:6
3747726:0:1
3747820:0:3
3747917:0:2
Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50994
Sample
Code:
     1. 20227 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1099 unique users in 11663 transactions
     2. 19931 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 741 unique users in 10927 transactions
     3. 18882 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9982 transactions
     4. 15176 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8748 transactions
     5. 14216 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1221 unique users in 5087 transactions
     6. 13015 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 709 unique users in 8673 transactions
     7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
     8. 11741 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 578 unique users in 4504 transactions
     9. 11583 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 488 unique users in 6425 transactions
    10. 11254 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6446 transactions
    11. 11252 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6543 transactions
    12. 10878 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 503 unique users in 5671 transactions
    13. 10459 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 573 unique users in 5993 transactions
    14. 9802 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 329 unique users in 5036 transactions
    15. 9559 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 632 unique users in 5171 transactions
    16. 9507 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 523 unique users in 4407 transactions
    17. 9397 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 452 unique users in 4695 transactions
    18. 9391 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 335 unique users in 3363 transactions
    19. 9299 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 434 unique users in 5081 transactions
    20. 9272 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 537 unique users in 4211 transactions
    21. 9188 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 391 unique users in 3260 transactions
    22. 8783 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 533 unique users in 4734 transactions
    23. 8534 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 453 unique users in 5057 transactions
    24. 8519 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4841 transactions
    25. 8494 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 568 unique users in 4999 transactions
    26. 8419 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 403 unique users in 4374 transactions
    27. 8390 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 406 unique users in 894 transactions
    28. 7737 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 456 unique users in 4278 transactions
    29. 7559 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4116 transactions
    30. 7289 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 576 unique users in 4332 transactions
    31. 7132 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 402 unique users in 3640 transactions
    32. 6882 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 228 unique users in 1769 transactions
    33. 6614 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 371 unique users in 3328 transactions
    34. 6610 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 387 unique users in 3608 transactions
    35. 6608 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 276 unique users in 2995 transactions
    36. 6576 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 935 unique users in 4252 transactions
    37. 6476 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 197 unique users in 3772 transactions
    38. 6442 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 479 unique users in 3579 transactions
    39. 6276 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 623 unique users in 3518 transactions
    40. 6255 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3586 transactions
    41. 6247 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 417 unique users in 3636 transactions
    42. 6156 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 524 unique users in 3590 transactions
    43. 6153 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 220 unique users in 3604 transactions
    44. 6132 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 328 unique users in 2894 transactions
    45. 6089 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 413 unique users in 3327 transactions
    46. 6053 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 453 unique users in 3392 transactions
    47. 6014 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2630 transactions
    48. 5862 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 203 unique users in 3389 transactions
    49. 5478 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 412 unique users in 2679 transactions
    50. 5441 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 444 unique users in 3842 transactions
.......
.......
.......
 50945. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50946. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50947. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50948. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50949. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50950. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50951. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50952. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50953. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50954. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50955. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50956. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50957. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50958. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50959. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50960. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50961. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50962. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50963. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50964. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50965. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50966. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50967. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50968. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50969. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50970. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50971. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50972. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50973. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50974. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50975. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50976. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50977. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50978. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50979. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50980. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50981. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50982. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50983. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50984. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50985. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50986. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50987. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50988. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50989. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50990. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50991. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50992. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50993. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 50994. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26560
Sample
Code:
     1. 71825 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 898 unique users in 12608 transactions
     2. 67152 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2176 unique users in 29017 transactions
     3. 66089 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3318 unique users in 17541 transactions
     4. 58124 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3561 unique users in 55931 transactions
     5. 57429 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4564 unique users in 32988 transactions
     6. 49056 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3651 unique users in 33958 transactions
     7. 43485 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2831 unique users in 15350 transactions
     8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
     9. 38174 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2959 unique users in 30976 transactions
    10. 37442 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2509 unique users in 13892 transactions
    11. 34008 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1576 unique users in 13766 transactions
    12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
    13. 31944 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1467 unique users in 10281 transactions
    14. 29527 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2094 unique users in 10457 transactions
    15. 28344 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1423 unique users in 7443 transactions
    16. 27867 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1678 unique users in 6574 transactions
    17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
    18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
    19. 22910 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1374 unique users in 9468 transactions
    20. 22822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6439 transactions
    21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
    22. 16988 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1704 unique users in 3897 transactions
    23. 16059 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1959 unique users in 6516 transactions
    24. 16040 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 743 unique users in 5915 transactions
    25. 15689 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1708 unique users in 7284 transactions
    26. 15309 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 533 unique users in 7184 transactions
    27. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
    28. 15142 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1166 unique users in 8957 transactions
    29. 14283 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1290 unique users in 8117 transactions
    30. 14273 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1102 unique users in 1750 transactions
    31. 13726 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1604 unique users in 7085 transactions
    32. 13198 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3601 transactions
    33. 13099 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2991 unique users in 6961 transactions
    34. 13080 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1334 unique users in 7310 transactions
    35. 13076 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1303 unique users in 5844 transactions
    36. 12867 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1127 unique users in 7843 transactions
    37. 12731 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 820 unique users in 4197 transactions
    38. 12696 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 818 unique users in 6022 transactions
    39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
    40. 11133 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1154 unique users in 6171 transactions
    41. 10483 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 540 unique users in 3941 transactions
    42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
    43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
    44. 8173 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1032 unique users in 3554 transactions
    45. 8107 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 752 unique users in 7125 transactions
    46. 8074 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3300 transactions
    47. 7874 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 571 unique users in 6879 transactions
    48. 7861 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 940 unique users in 3448 transactions
    49. 7354 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 499 unique users in 5825 transactions
    50. 7092 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 514 unique users in 4014 transactions
.......
.......
.......
 26511. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26512. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26513. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26514. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26515. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26516. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26517. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26518. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26519. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26520. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26521. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26522. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26523. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26524. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26525. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26526. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26527. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26528. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26529. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26530. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26531. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26532. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26533. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26534. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26535. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26536. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26537. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26538. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26539. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26540. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26541. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26542. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26543. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26544. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26545. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26546. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26547. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26548. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26549. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26550. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26551. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26552. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26553. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26554. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26555. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26556. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26557. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26558. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26559. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
 26560. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 324471 (14.34%)
Tuesday 323498 (14.30%)
Wednesday 323586 (14.30%)
Thursday 345141 (15.26%)
Friday 342586 (15.15%)
Saturday 299307 (13.23%)
Sunday 302702 (13.38%)
Total: 2261291

* This file will be overwritten by newer versions


26. Post 66456495 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 01:51:01 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Good evening Bitcointalkers,

I stayed awake late to announce the results of this round because I felted a slight disturbance.

Round 5 is now over, here are the results :

Closing price on 27/02/2026 : 65 884$

   Name      Prediction      B/M      Final prediction      Difference   
   Leahized         65 666,00            65 666,00      218,00   
   GazetaBitcoin      65 623,00            65 623,00      261,00   
   LoyceV         65 602,60            65 602,60      281,40   
   Pmalek         66 457,00            66 457,00      573,00   
   promise444c5       65 050,00            65 050,00      834,00   
   Hypnotizer      64 998,60            64 998,60      885,40   
   LogitechMouse      64 969,69      0,50% malus      64 644,84      1 239,16   
   examplens         65 006,02      0,75% malus      64 518,47      1 365,53   
   ESG         64 444,44      0,25% malus      64 283,33      1 600,67   
   xLays              67 676,00            67 676,00      1 792,00   
   Doan9269         63 850,00            63 850,00      2 034,00   
   cryptofrka      63 750,00      0,50% malus      63 431,25      2 452,75   
   Mr. Magkaisa       62 262,62            62 262,62      3 621,38   
                              

First blood !! Sorry Mr. Magkaisa, someone had to be the first, but you are the first player eliminated from the game. Don't be sad, you fought until the end, but it wasn't enough. Stick around, we never know, it's never over.
Congratulations Leahized, you are the winner of this round, 50BTC have been credited to your account.
xLays, I have reimbursed you 10BTC of the 50 you spent. You have given a malus to someone who did not participate.

For round 6, I want to prove to you that I'm nice guy. No one will lose a life in this round. Isn't that cool ?
Buuuuuuuut, yeah as you might have guessed, there's always a 'but'. The bottom 3 in round 6 will receive a major malus that will affect their next rounds.


Round 6 : The poisoned malus

What will be the price of Bitcoin at March 05, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 04/03/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before March 02, 2026, 07:00:00 PM.
 
Cash shop: OPEN
 
Special rules : None.


27. Post 66456385 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Sat Feb 28 00:52:55 CET 2026) in Re:
Haven’t been around the forum for a while, came back around this time last year. Over the past year, i’ve really realized how much some people here mean to the forum and how many genuinely good folks there are
So, let’s get started

Code:
Hero of Good: LoyceV, examplens
- LoyceV -  I don't think i need to say much about this guy , the forum simply wouldn’t be as good without him. Since i became a member of AoBT, i haven't just been translating his posts , through all that work i've gained a lot of valuable knowledge. I'm still trying to learn and improve, and LoyceV is someone everyone can learn a lot from.
- examplens - His presence on this forum has a huge impact , first of all on me, and i'm sure on many other members as well. Twelve years on the forum is no small thing, and the knowledge he shares is genuinely useful. Every time i had a doubt or a question, examplens had an answer. On top of that, he’s simply a good guy who genuinely likes to help others

Code:
Forum Ninja: Tryninja
‎- Tryninja - For me, it’s definitely TryNinja. We really should be grateful for the time and effort he puts in. In my opinion, the most useful tool is Bitcointalk Notifier v2, which i use every single day.
Code:
Bitcoin Greek: GazetaBitcoin
- GazetaBitcoin - His posts really carry weight, and i've learned a lot about Bitcoin just by reading them.  His dedication and effort are truly admirable. He also helps a lot with running AoBT, where i'm a member myself.

Code:
Best Event: Roobet Art Contest
‎- Roobet Art Contest - For me, in general, it's the Roobet Art Contest. I've participated several times, doing something i genuinely enjoy - drawing. That contest always shows just how creative people on this forum really are, and how much effort can pay off in the end.

Code:
Best Project : Talkimg.com
- Talkimg.com - Simply put, in my opinion it's the best project. I often use this site when posting images and i've never had any issues with it. 10/10.
‎
Code:
Discovery of the year:*Ace*

*Ace* - His effort really means a lot for this forum. The tools he's shared so far are really solid. I honestly think this member is the future of the forum.

Code:
Help Buster: nutildah
‎
nutildah - A member who fights against spam and AI generated posts. He's doing really well, and the effort he puts in truly helps keep the forum high quality.
‎
‎
Code:
Craft Master: Hhampuz, Little Mouse ,taufik123  


Hhampuz, Little Mouse - Two managers who, in my opinion, handle their job in the most professional way. I've had the chance to participate in their campaigns, and i was always treated fairly 100%, even when i made mistakes , they gave me a chance to prove myself. Above all, they’re good people, and then great managers.

taufik123 - really impressed me at the Art Contest with his dedication and the amazing skills he showed. I think an artist like him deserves more attention, because works like his are really hard to beat on this forum.
‎
‎
Code:
Local Hero: ovcijisir , dkbit98, Pmalek
‎This might be the hardest category for me to vote in. In the Croatian local board where i am, there are so many great members with a lot of knowledge, but unfortunately, i can't vote for everyone.
- ovcijisir - A member who’s put in a lot of effort, especially lately, since he decided to focus on all crypto scams and make things easier for all of us. I hope he keeps going just like he has so far.
- dkbit98 - Pmalek - Their dedication to the local part of the forum has always been exemplary. Since i came back, their support has always meant a lot to me, especially their knowledge. They're also largely responsible for some of us in the local board moving up to higher ranks.

Code:
Miss Bitcointalk:Mia Chloe

- Mia Chloe - I’m often active in the parts of the forum where Mia Chloe is. You can always see how quick she is and how ready she is to help new members. I think Mia Chloe truly deserves this award.
‎


28. Post 66455116 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Fri Feb 27 19:09:25 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: examplens on February 25, 2026, 10:31:51 AM
Quote from: Pmalek on February 25, 2026, 07:51:15 AM
Quote from: Daniel91 on February 24, 2026, 09:26:51 AM
However, why do you think you will never need to introduce a kyc rule in the future? Of course, anonymity is very important to all of us, your current and future users, and that is the main reason for using your service, but in the event of a court decision or ban, it will still become an obligation, right? So far, I have already seen many crypto exchanges that initially did not ask for kyc, but were later forced to introduce it due to pressure from the authorities.
There were also those who didn't cooperate with governments and law enforcement, remained 100% KYC free and anonymous, and were later taken down and confiscated, while the self-proclaimed crypto investigators were celebrating their demise. Luckily, not all services do what they are being told, but that's also why they become prime targets in investigations by those interested in protecting our future and our children.
As long as they are off the radar of those famous "crypto investigators" from X, they are probably safe. Also, if some of the jealous competitors feel that Sageswap is taking part in their market, they will organize a media campaign against SS, and they can quickly become the target of various critical attacks.

The biggest problem that seems to be with the introduction of the No AML swap service is the fact that someone could connect us with helping with “launder money" for someone and put us on a sanctions list, e.g. in the USA.

That is why, at SageSwap, every time a new exchange is created, we create a new address to which the user deposits money so that service A cannot be linked to user B.

In the future, we will try to introduce even more obstacles to make it even more difficult to track the transactions we carry out with users.


29. Post 66455031 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Fri Feb 27 18:49:07 CET 2026) in Re:
Code:
Hero of Good: theymos, suchmoon
It probably looks like a piece of cake to some, but I am sure that it is not easy at all to do what theymos has been doing for years and to deal with that kind of responsibility. Regarding suchmoon, in my opinion he is one of the best posters on the forum, and I wish he were more active.


Code:
Forum Ninja: TryNinja, DdmrDdmr, LoyceV
It would be hard to magine bitcointalk without those users and their tools that I use on basically the daily basis.


Code:
Bitcoin Geek: GazetaBitcoin, dkbit98
GazetaBitcoin wrote some of the more interesting posts about bitcoin and its signifance on this forum, while dkbit98 is the guy I would contact if I had some questions regarding bitcoin.


Code:
Best Event: Bitcoin Pizza Day Contest
As a big fan of home make pizzas, and even bigger fan of bitcoin themed pizzas, for me no event beats that, especially in the last year or two when it as pushed to another level by our member's skill and imagination.


Code:
Best project: BitList
I liked ninjastic.space, and now it evolved into even something bigger, which is BitList. Having said that, I am still getting used to it, and I miss some things that ninjastic.space had.


Code:
Discovery of the Year: AakZaki
I've seen his name around throughout the years, but I didn't know until recently that he is a very capable alt account buster as well.


Code:
Help Buster: holydarkness, nutildah, lovesmayfamilis
I am nominating holydarkness for his role in mediating between casinos and those who think they have been wronged by them, while nutildah and lovesmayfamilis for their scam busting work and keeping the forum better place for us all.


Code:
CraftMaster:Cro2 team ( Trofo&cryptofrka), icopress,
Cro2 team is behind the best gambling board thing going on, Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League. It takes time just to participate in it, and I don't even wanna think about how much time they spend running that thing for 3 years now.
I am also nominating icopress for having a positive impact on how signature campaigns have been run in recent years and for organizing initiatives such as this one.


Code:
Local Hero: slackovic, katanic97, Pmalek
Activity in our local board has been declining for quite some time, and sudden appereance of katanic97 and the effort he put really made our local board more lively, while slackovic has been consistently our most active member year after year, without whose spam our local board wouldn't be the same. Pmalek is another important member of our local board who beside being a very knowledgeable guy also helped our lower ranking members reaching higher ranks.


Code:
Miss Bitcointalk:foxpup
Every time I stumble upon her somewhere on the forum, that iconic Jimi Hendrix song comes to mind. Sapienti sat.  Wink


30. Post 66454775 (unedited backup) (by ZAINmalik75) (scraped on Fri Feb 27 17:36:37 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Zaguru12 on February 26, 2026, 11:22:14 PM
You yourself said, while I condemn any form of attack I think it’s logical that why it is happening during the bullish cycle because this is the cycle where you see wealth been flaunt or best where you see most holders waking up their wallets due to movement of coins in and out of the wallet. Since this bearish sentiment started have you see news of any whale having his wallet wake up.

This attackers are very informative and interesting I don’t have information to back it up but it has many things to do with data breaches that we see around on even ledger wallets and we fail to take them seriously.  We need to ask what happens when data leaks. I think this list actually shows why there are more attacks on such data

Also what reason does an attacker has to hold a stolen item?
I was assuming but you made it sure. It is logical and the explanation that Pmalek gave below makes more sense. Because in a bull market, when price is going up from $60k to $120k and then $125k everyone is willing to buy, everyone is super bullish because they think at this price bitcoin will never dump. But this time it was not only the price that increased but the adoption from countries too. But on the other hand in bear market everyone wants to stay away from bitcoin because they think it is going down so there is no point in holding or buying it now.

In the same way scammers wait and they must be motivated by the victim's portfolio's value in the bull market. That's why privacy matters and we should never share with anyone how much we hold and simply moving funds from one wallet to another does not add any extra layer to privacy.


31. Post 66452308 (unedited backup) (by ZAINmalik75) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 23:54:07 CET 2026) in i am buying the dip, if you can please do:
Quote from: FirmWars on Today at 08:02:03 PM
Bringing this here is not bad as long as your identity was not revealed in anyway, you already covered your name on the receipt which is good, if you also have your identity already known my some members on the forum living in the same country with you, then it is not totally good to announce the amount of Bitcoin you bought, you can encourage people to buy the dip without showing how much Bitcoin you have bought on your own. I am allocating some usdt to Bitcoin as well because I'm also taking the opportunity of the bear cycle to buy some Bitcoin.
Yes, we should never share with anyone how much Bitcoin we have bought, and if possible, always tell them a lesser amount because we never know what the other person is thinking. A database named https://stats.gart.io/ shared by pmalek gives us an idea of why we should hide our earnings and our investments in Bitcoin.

Especially in a place where our friends or those who know who you are and where you live, they can now know how much you invested, and that's how things can become bad for you when the bull run arrives. According to the database, cases increase with the increase in the price of Bitcoin. This correlation is a hint for investors that they should avoid sharing unnecessary information, and if they are too excited, hide the amount at least and only share that they have bought, it would not matter how much they bought.


32. Post 66452165 (unedited backup) (by ZAINmalik75) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 23:18:55 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:23 AM
The database contains several interesting stats and graphics.

For example, there is this one that shows the correlation between the price of bitcoin and the number of attacks. As the value of BTC increases, the number of attacks increases.

Is there anything that surprised you with the data from this database?
Yes, it surprised me. The data on the site is really shocking, and I never thought there would be so many cases reported. I only come to read one or two which are too big that everyone is covering them. But a lot of cases mentioned in the database, I have never read them before anywhere.

The pattern is strange though. Why would they wait for the bull market to do their dirty obscene work? They could do it anytime or at the best time. Why would they wait for the bull market so they could get more profit? Even if they do it in the bear market, they could wait and hold the coins until the price increases. Maybe they don't want to hold coins that are trouble-creating for too long.


33. Post 66451391 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 19:49:43 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:23 AM
I haven't seen anyone else mention this on the forum.
It's a database that documents cases of violence and physical attacks on bitcoin and cryptocurrency holders since 2014.
I know Jameson Lopp was tracking most of the cases of physical attacks on bitcoin, but he didn't create dedicated website only for that.
Gart website is nicely showing stats in different countries, but I am sure some countries are missing from their list.
I also don't see recommendations what to do for protection and how to react in case you get attacked.



34. Post 66451308 (unedited backup) (by EluguHcman) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 19:26:01 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:23 AM
Is there anything that surprised you with the data from this database?
There is actually nothing surprising about the data to me because right from when I have learnt about the value of Bitcoin and how it is being technologically embedded, it never portrayed a scam free aided financial system except for the fact of it Decentralization consensus that is aimed to tightening security and gives users the hedge of custody of their funds.

Drastically, the formation to stay safe while owning and using Bitcoin is junctured on individuals means of keeping privacy, so whichever way you misses the key guidelines of keeping your seed phrase safe or not letting the public beware of your portfolio, you will definitely stand on the risk of facing any of the attack challenges which maybe either online or physical attack.

As for the measure of the countries where the incidents had occurred according to the database, I don't feel shock about it neither because I either don't expect a specific region to be illiterates bind to be exposed to related dangers.

I am up in support of this shared information in creating awareness about the risk surrounding Bitcoin so that we can always say safe.


35. Post 66450982 (unedited backup) (by Cryptomultiplier) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 17:45:37 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Ndabagi01 on Today at 04:36:04 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:23 AM
At the bottom of the page, you can read news articles about all the documented violence cases against crypto owners.
Is there anything that surprised you with the data from this database?

I’m surprised that countries that even made bitcoin use as legal tender didn’t make the top list, but I’d assume some attack also didn’t get to the news to be recorded because they can’t get all attacks documented in this websites. We have some other countries where Bitcoin investors are also quite many but because of the less dominance of the use there, physical attacks on such places wont make it to the news to be documented accordingly.

Where there is money, there is always possible danger accompanying it, if all these can be spotted, then we need to find solution as to how to mitigate the attacks on this holders. The government can be of help but these holders also have to learn how to practice self privacy, it is better off for them before any intervention can even come for them to help protect these sort of assaults on them because of their bitcoin holdings.
Am sure this is only a data showing the cases that were reported, otherwise I would say it should surpass what it is currently because some cases in underdeveloped and even developed countries don't make it the news.
Am more disturbed about physical kidnapping cases because how the hell could have kidnappers gained such information on who owns Bitcoin or cryptocurrency in their wallet?
As for cases of hacks and scams, it is quite believable because some investors may not be too tech savvy and thus don't know how to safe guard themselves.

Since Bitcoin and crypto currencies are becoming more adopted and in many cases, a legal tender, the government should do more sensitization to expose the truth and enlighten individual investors on how to be safe out there. They owe the citizens that much because they pay taxes and that how taxes are to be used so as not to affect revenue and the economy of the country.


36. Post 66450943 (unedited backup) (by Ndabagi01) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 17:36:07 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:23 AM
At the bottom of the page, you can read news articles about all the documented violence cases against crypto owners.
Is there anything that surprised you with the data from this database?

I’m surprised that countries that even made bitcoin use as legal tender didn’t make the top list, but I’d assume some attack also didn’t get to the news to be recorded because they can’t get all attacks documented in this websites. We have some other countries where Bitcoin investors are also quite many but because of the less dominance of the use there, physical attacks on such places wont make it to the news to be documented accordingly.

Where there is money, there is always possible danger accompanying it, if all these can be spotted, then we need to find solution as to how to mitigate the attacks on this holders. The government can be of help but these holders also have to learn how to practice self privacy, it is better off for them before any intervention can even come for them to help protect these sort of assaults on them because of their bitcoin holdings.


37. Post 66450934 (unedited backup) (by notocactus) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 17:33:49 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:28:09 PM
The situation is changing. I was in Stockholm, Sweden for work in 2024, and the place has a big problem with growing crime. It's not crime perpetrated by the local population, but by immigrants. That beautiful city has suburbs that are now considered immigrant ghettos, filled with criminal activities of all kinds. One afternoon I needed to meet a colleague in town, but he was 40 minutes late. The reason: a ghetto gang pushed out garbage containers onto the tracks and then threw stones and bottles on the train and its passengers. He told me problems occur almost on a daily basis, but the authorities are trying not to give it to much attention on purpose. I expect to see Sweden higher up on negative lists in the future.
That's really unbelievable as I knew that Sweden is like other North Western nations that have very low crime rates. What you described is really bad especially it happened in Sweden and I saw some videos on X about similar problems by immigrants in Western nations but it's hard to believe all of these videos are real.

Anyway your story convinces me that immigrants especially who are from nations with bad backgrounds from education, politics to societies are causing massive problems in developed and first world. There is a famous saying on media "Importing the third world, your nation will be a third world too".

It looks like it has been going for a while and social problems there have become bigger with time. Possibly Trump is right about immigration policies not only in the USA but many western nations.


38. Post 66449605 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 10:42:43 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:46:07 AM
~
Jesi siguran za ovo? U početnom postu piše "OPEN" ali gledam menadžerove objave unazad mjesec dana i nigdje ne piše da prima nove članove kampanje.

Iskreno nisam bio siguran,zato je nisam odmah stavio u tablicu. Vidim da se clanovi prijavljuju i da pise OPEN. Svakako sam kontaktirao icopress-a preko poruke pa sad cekam da mi potvrdi da znam da li da je uvrstim u tablicu ili ne. Da zatvorimo slucaj sto bi se reklo Grin


39. Post 66449572 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 10:28:43 CET 2026) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
The time has come for another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time for January 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja BitList

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards.


Post activity per local board during January 2026

During the last month, 13925 posts were written across local boards, which is a very small decerase compared to December's number (13997). The top 5 is almost the same as month before, with only Pilipinas and German boards changing the positions, while the same thing can be said for the bottom, with Greek board being an exception.



Active members per local board during January 2026

During January, 1392 members wrote at least one post, which is a drop compared to December, during which 1441 members were active. Majority of this decrease is caused by Russian and Indonesian local boards, while some like Nigerian keep growing month after month.



Local board members per amount of posts during January 2026

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Polish local board is the leader with 57%, while at the same time Nigerian local has only 15% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket, Indonesian is the leader with 50%, while Greek local didn't have such members at all.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Greek board dominates with 57%, while Romanian and French locals both had only 11%.



Merit shared per local board during January 2026

During January, 9717 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, which is a big increase compared to December's 7657 merit. Majority of the local boards had the increase, but majority of it happened on German local that went from only 423 merit sent in December to 1592 in January.



Merit/Post ratio per local board during Janaury 2026

The average merit per post across all local boards that are part of this overview is 0.7, and if I remember correctly it may be the highest average ever.

I didn't think that I will ever say this, but I think that forum at the moment may be over merited. Some parts of the forum and some local boards are imho still undermited, but generally speaking, I am no sure that this is in the best interest of the forum as it may attract account farmers.



Merit senders and receivers per local board during January 2026

In January, 633 members sent while 725 received merit, which is a big increase compared to December (527 senders and 628 receivers). Once again, majority of this happened due Nigerian board, that had their all time high numbers of merit system participants.



Percentage of merited posts across local boards during January 2026

I decided to make this chart again as this time I am using numbers from BitList which I hope calculate percentage of merited posts differently from Merit Dashboard. Situation is at it was in the past-Romanian board at the top with a very high 67% of merited posts, while French at the bottom with only 6%.



Merit per transaction across local boards during January 2026

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards.



The most active members per local board during January 2026

And for the end of the overview, list of the most active local boards members. joker_josue from Portuguese bioard is back at the top with 144 posts, klarki from Russian ia at the 2nd with 137 posts while Turkish member mandown, who wrote 135 posts, is at the 3rd spot. Gj guys!

Russian |German |Turkish |Italian |Portuguese |Spanish |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. klarki [137] |1. MaxMueller [87] |1. mandown [135] |1. Paolo.Demidov [59] |1. joker_josue [144] |1. famososMuertos [41] |
2. jokers10 [121] |2. Soonandwaite [75] |2. yenerbatmaz [70] |2. gbianchi [49] |2. sabotag3x [79] |2. Don Pedro Dinero [31] |
3. Julien_Olynpic [96] |3. MinoRaiola [51] |3. execijutiere [67] |3. babo [40] |3. bitmover [54] |3. Porfirii [27] |
4. safar1980 [91] |4. Unknown01 [48] |4. Valcendier [65] |4. arulbero [30] |4. criptoevangelista [45] |4. danadc [18] |
5. zasad@ [87] |5. Real-Duke [47] |5. ajanwalker [56] |5. fillippone [30] |5. TryNinja [43] |5. darxiaomi [13] |
6. mak013 [62] |6. mole0815 [46] |6. Phoenix Anka [56] |6. Ale88 [24] |6. alegotardo [40] |6. Crystal-Trade.org [13] |
7. Alex077 [57] |7. Koal-84 [44] |7. kriminall [55] |7. bitbollo [20] |7. Forsyth Jones [39] |7. Mateomateomateo [13] |
8. internetional [49] |8. cygan [35] |8. Hvdv [54] |8. *Ace* [20] |8. Pumared [27] |8. Hispo [11] |
9. PerfectumR [47] |9. virginorange [33] |9. lodocus [52] |9. Italian Panic [19] |9. mikel_012 [26] |9. darbitmobilerecovery [11] |
10. KTChampions [44] |10. willi9974 [30] |10. blomen [51] |10. Lillominato89 [13] |10. davipinheiro [22] |10. LucasSilverGold [9] |

Indonesian |French |Pilipinas |Croatian |Nigerian |Arabic |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. Chikito [93] |1. patrickus [17] |1. GreatArkansas [31] |1. slackovic [45] |1. Floxynice [92] |1. yhiaali3 [29] |
2. AakZaki [35] |2. winspiral [14] |2. tech30338 [28] |2. katanic97 [38] |2. Jubilee58 [92] |2. Kavelj22 [29] |
3. Husna QA [32] |3. Danydee [9] |3. arwin100 [26] |3. Pmalek [20] |3. Karl_3000 [72] |3. khaled0111 [26] |
4. mu_enrico [30] |4. fpelu [7] |4. julerz12 [25] |4. examplens [19] |4. Bishop Victor [55] |4. OmegaStarScream [12] |
5. iqbal26 [27] |5. Saint-loup [4] |5. cryptoaddictchie [25] |5. ovcijisir [16] |5. Africolo [53] |5. ZaynOsmanAli [10] |
6. Luzin [25] |6. Becassine [4] |6. coin-investor [24] |6. cryptofrka [16] |6. PremiumcryptoHub [45] |6. AnwarKhattabAnwar [9] |
7. taufik123 [22] |7. TryNinja [3] |7. lionheart78 [23] |7. Daniel91 [15] |7. Yablee0 [42] |7. HasanIbnSaud [7] |
8. MAAManda [21] |8. Rocou [2] |8. aioc [22] |8. Trofo [15] |8. LOVER BOY 422 [42] |8. Abdullah6969 [7] |
9. abhiseshakana [19] |9. Halab [2] |9. bhadz [20] |9. Rikafip [15] |9. Charles-Tim [41] |9. GxSTxV [5] |
10. joniboini [15] |10. GrosWesh [2] |10. blockman [20] |10. dkbit98 [9] |10. SatoPrincess [40] |10. RedFlix [4] |

Polish |Indian |Greek |Romanian |Pakistan* |Bengali* |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. cygan [11] |1. vivekdhyani1 [36] |1. cryptosize [50] |1. GazetaBitcoin [13] |1. qurbanshah02 [67] |1. Bd officer [18] |
2. pawel7777 [3] |2. JSRAW [33] |2. alani123 [38] |2. NeuroticFish [9] |2. JunaidAzizi [39] |2. DYING_S0UL [12] |
3. TryNinja [3] |3. Bitcoin Smith [27] |3. BlackHatCoiner [35] |3. TryNinja [3] |3. Jaweria parveen [32] |3. BlackHatSojib [11] |
4. EXMON [1] |4. pawanjain [22] |4. Ultegra134 [15] |4. Aetherischain [3] |4. HustleZ [28] |4. Crypto Library [9] |
5. fillippone [1] |5. Maestrobigbrock777 [9] |5. apogio [1] |5. bogdy23 [2] |5. MusaPk [26] |5. Z_MBFM [9] |
6. lukaszstepnowski [1] |6. TheUltraElite [6] |6. mastercryptogr [1] |6. antonpans [1] |6. ZAINmalik75 [24] |6. Mahiyammahi [4] |
7. ABCKrypto [1] |7. David_Surfgate [6] |7. bettyparker098 [1] |7. jedaite [1] |7. Rustam Meraj [17] |7. Review Master [3] |
|8. winspiral [5] | |8. antimonycoin [1] |8. Compromise me [16] |8. Btcloop [2] |
|9. Vihaanraviii [5] | |9. Nepemate [1] |9. Sabih7 [16] |9. Comando65 [2] |
|10. LucyFurr [3] | | |10. ThemePen [16] |10. Nadifa2030 [2] |


40. Post 66449500 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 10:03:13 CET 2026) in Database of Physical Attacks Against Crypto Holders:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:27:23 AM
I haven't seen anyone else mention this on the forum.
It's a database that documents cases of violence and physical attacks on bitcoin and cryptocurrency holders since 2014.

You can take a look at it at https://stats.gart.io/

These are the current stats at the time of writing:
- 310 reported attacks
- 57 countries where attacks took place
- +77% year to year increase in attacks
- 25 fatalities

The database contains several interesting stats and graphics.
I don't know as for now I can not check two pages on Github about Bitcoin physical attacks (I can not access Github now) but I remember these pages did not list too many attack cases like more than 300 cases.

The site you shared likely has more reported physical attack cases but I need to check two following pages when I can access them again.
https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacks
https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacks


41. Post 66449460 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 09:50:37 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 08:30:13 AM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:46:07 AM
U početnom postu piše "OPEN" ali gledam menadžerove objave unazad mjesec dana i nigdje ne piše da prima nove članove kampanje.
Ljudi se prijavljuju, a on nije rekao da trenutno ne primaju nove clanove, sto znaci da bi trebala biti i dalje otvorena.

Vidim da je zadnji post managera u threadu bio ovaj:
Quote from: icopress on February 23, 2026, 02:36:50 PM
Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 128 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 66,100] Wink


Primijetite da u subjectu nema riječi [OPEN]. Ali onda je jedan član napisao svoju prijavu pri čemu je u subject poruke dodao [OPEN]. Ne znam točno kako forum funkcionira i mijenja li se subject threada temeljem subjecta zadnje poruke ili temeljem subjecta prve poruke, ali činjenica je da menadžer u svojoj zadnjoj poruci nije napisao da je kampanja otvorena, dok u naslovu threada stoji [OPEN].


42. Post 66449404 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Feb 26 09:30:19 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:46:07 AM
U početnom postu piše "OPEN" ali gledam menadžerove objave unazad mjesec dana i nigdje ne piše da prima nove članove kampanje.
Ljudi se prijavljuju, a on nije rekao da trenutno ne primaju nove clanove, sto znaci da bi trebala biti i dalje otvorena.





43. Post 66447788 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 20:16:43 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Lock & unlock

Here are your predictions for round 5 :

   Name      Prediction      B/M   
   BABY SHOES      N/A         
   Becassine      N/A      0,5% malus   
   cryptofrka      63 750,00      0,5% malus   
   Danydee      N/A         
   Doan9269         63 850,00         
   ESG         64 444,44      0,25% malus   
   examplens         65 006,02      0,75% malus   
   GazetaBitcoin      65 623,00         
   Hypnotizer      64 998,60         
   Leahized         65 666,00         
   LogitechMouse      64 969,69      0,5% malus   
   LoyceV         65 602,60         
   Mr. Magkaisa       62 262,62         
   Pmalek         66 457,00         
   promise444c5       65 050,00         
   TryNinja          N/A         
   xLays              67 676,00         
                  

Will this small pump last all week ?

Still lots of people who forgot to participate :
BABY SHOES, Danydee => -1 life
Becassine, TryNinja => MIA


44. Post 66446994 (unedited backup) (by xLays) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 16:30:31 CET 2026) in 💧 Rainbet.com 💧 | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Competitive Rewards 💦:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:01:59 AM
Quote from: xLays on February 24, 2026, 07:27:20 PM
I keep getting this error whenever I try to log in to my Rainbet account. My internet connection is fine, but the error still appears. When I use VPN to login, the issue disappears. Can anyone explain why this is happening? Before the issue is when I login I'm stuck in rainbet logo
Does Rainbet allow users to play on their site while using a VPN?
Is this something you experience every time you try to log in or has it just appeared out of the blue? Cloudflare was down for several hours a few days ago. I can't remember if I read that news yesterday or the day before yesterday. It could be related, but perhaps you wouldn't be able to log in with a VPN either if that was the reason.

I just tried with my own account. I see the usual Cloudflare verification notice, but after that I am taken to the casino's homepage like always. The Rainbet logo appears and loads for a few seconds and then everything is back to normal.

Like I said before, it was only getting stuck on the rainbet logo animation. I also posted about that issue here in this thread about a month ago, I think. But now yes, every time I try to log in to rainbet, I get that error. It only gets resolved when I use a VPN.

Anyway I tried logging in today because I won a sports freebet from the EFL Championship pool. I placed the free bet and managed to win. I immediately requested withdrawal for that winning amount and it was instantly credited to my wallet without any issue.

thanks rainbet.


45. Post 66446136 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 11:31:55 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:51:15 AM
Quote from: Daniel91 on February 24, 2026, 09:26:51 AM
However, why do you think you will never need to introduce a kyc rule in the future? Of course, anonymity is very important to all of us, your current and future users, and that is the main reason for using your service, but in the event of a court decision or ban, it will still become an obligation, right? So far, I have already seen many crypto exchanges that initially did not ask for kyc, but were later forced to introduce it due to pressure from the authorities.
There were also those who didn't cooperate with governments and law enforcement, remained 100% KYC free and anonymous, and were later taken down and confiscated, while the self-proclaimed crypto investigators were celebrating their demise. Luckily, not all services do what they are being told, but that's also why they become prime targets in investigations by those interested in protecting our future and our children.
As long as they are under the radar of those famous "crypto investigators" from X, they are probably safe. Also, if some of the jealous competitors feel that Sageswap is taking part in their market, they will organize a media campaign against SS, and they can quickly become the target of various critical attacks.


46. Post 66446107 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 11:23:55 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:51:15 AM
Quote from: Daniel91 on February 24, 2026, 09:26:51 AM
However, why do you think you will never need to introduce a kyc rule in the future? Of course, anonymity is very important to all of us, your current and future users, and that is the main reason for using your service, but in the event of a court decision or ban, it will still become an obligation, right? So far, I have already seen many crypto exchanges that initially did not ask for kyc, but were later forced to introduce it due to pressure from the authorities.
There were also those who didn't cooperate with governments and law enforcement, remained 100% KYC free and anonymous, and were later taken down and confiscated, while the self-proclaimed crypto investigators were celebrating their demise. Luckily, not all services do what they are being told, but that's also why they become prime targets in investigations by those interested in protecting our future and our children.

Yes, unfortunately I am aware of this and that is why I asked this question.
These days, due to the pressure of new crypto regulations in the EU and elsewhere, it is increasingly difficult to find crypto services that do not require KYC and that is why SageSwap is great news for all of us who want to protect our privacy.
At the beginning of crypto, it was not a problem to sell or buy some cryptocurrency without ID verification, but now it is increasingly difficult to find exchanges where it is possible.
I hope SageSwap will be with us for a long time.  Cheesy


47. Post 66445442 (unedited backup) (by nc50lc) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 04:47:55 CET 2026) in Electrum 4.7.0 released:
Quote from: AakZaki on February 24, 2026, 11:20:52 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on February 24, 2026, 04:21:47 PM
-snip-
It seems like you don't realize and need to change the link you shared because it's wrong, as LoyceV says it's BlueWallet.
It's not just his link, the release notes are also for Blue Wallet's latest version.
There seem to be a mix-up on Pmalek's notes or something.

If anything, it's only necessary to edit the wallet's name (3 instances) and post it in Blue Wallet's thread instead.


48. Post 66445306 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 02:37:01 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io Scam:
Quote from: holydarkness on February 24, 2026, 05:22:25 PM
Quote from: T1HGO on February 24, 2026, 09:41:27 AM
[...]
Quote from: holydarkness on February 23, 2026, 04:11:00 PM
Quote from: T1HGO on February 23, 2026, 12:15:27 AM
Summary of the Dispute
[...]

Just glancing over it as I know somewhere in that wall of text my name is being mentioned, uhh... what's the purpose of this... whatever this is? Is it a summary of a formal complaint you filed to court, or you simply pasted what you ask AI to summarize this thread?

Yes, i asked AI to deepsearch this thread and summarize it and reach a veredict. Yes, your name comes up, and i apologize if it bothers you. As for the purpose of this, is to continue to expose this dogshit scam. Why else would it be?

[...]

Well uhh, you do aware that they've gave their verdict and the case marked as resolved upon their explanation on post #100 and after the explanative post, none of the user you mentioned through the AI is pitching in to argue back, thus they understand and accept the explanation.

So, this part is kinda misleading,

Quote from: T1HGO on February 23, 2026, 12:15:27 AM
[...]

Community Opinions
Forum users (e.g., albon, Tręvoid, holydarkness, AHOYBRAUSE, Pmalek, Zwei) largely support T1HGO, criticizing Betpanda.io for vagueness, lack of proof, and a pattern of similar issues. Points raised:
[...]


Why can Betpanda close a case? It should be marked as a scam.


49. Post 66445160 (unedited backup) (by T1HGO) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 00:26:49 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io Scam:
Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 05:22:25 PM
Quote from: T1HGO on Today at 09:41:27 AM
[...]
Quote from: holydarkness on February 23, 2026, 04:11:00 PM
Quote from: T1HGO on February 23, 2026, 12:15:27 AM
Summary of the Dispute
[...]

Just glancing over it as I know somewhere in that wall of text my name is being mentioned, uhh... what's the purpose of this... whatever this is? Is it a summary of a formal complaint you filed to court, or you simply pasted what you ask AI to summarize this thread?

Yes, i asked AI to deepsearch this thread and summarize it and reach a veredict. Yes, your name comes up, and i apologize if it bothers you. As for the purpose of this, is to continue to expose this dogshit scam. Why else would it be?

[...]

Well uhh, you do aware that they've gave their verdict and the case marked as resolved upon their explanation on post #100 and after the explanative post, none of the user you mentioned through the AI is pitching in to argue back, thus they understand and accept the explanation.

So, this part is kinda misleading,

Quote from: T1HGO on February 23, 2026, 12:15:27 AM
[...]

Community Opinions
Forum users (e.g., albon, Tręvoid, holydarkness, AHOYBRAUSE, Pmalek, Zwei) largely support T1HGO, criticizing Betpanda.io for vagueness, lack of proof, and a pattern of similar issues. Points raised:
[...]

Yes, i am aware they gave their veredict on comment #100, but their veredict is very unfair and full of lies to say the least. It's a whole bunch of nothing and even i get bored of myself for repeating the same. I argue with facts and proof to my claims, they argue with proven wrong theorys.
I get what you're saying about that paragraph. While it's true they didn't argue back after post #100, besides you, it's also true that they didn't come here saying they agreed with betpanda in post #100. Also i don't think there's a thread before post #100 and another after it. But then again, i didn't write and this was the conclusion AI reached, and i think it's pretty accurate.
If any of the users mentioned changed their stance or opinion on this matter, or simply don't want to be mentioned, just say the word, and i will edit it and remove the names. I understand it might look bad for you, so if you want, i will edit it your name out.


50. Post 66445148 (unedited backup) (by AakZaki) (scraped on Wed Feb 25 00:20:55 CET 2026) in Electrum 4.7.0 released:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:21:47 PM
I will use this thread to announce the release of the new version of Electrum for Android and iOS. It's available for download from Electrum's GitHub page.

-snip-

https://github.com/BlueWallet/BlueWallet/releases/tag/v7.2.6
It seems like you don't realize and need to change the link you shared because it's wrong, as LoyceV says it's BlueWallet.
Shouldn't this link be the one you put https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/releases/tag/4.7.0



51. Post 66444444 (unedited backup) (by contesthunters.com) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 20:47:49 CET 2026) in Earnbet | BTC Price Prediction | Prize- $100 | 4 places paid| 21/02/2026:
WINNERS

Code:
    BTT USERNAME      EARNBET ID     PREDICTION     PRIZE   

1.) CONVOAI           CONVOAI        $66,000        $25             
2.) BABY SHOES        babyshoes      $66,374.23     $25       
3.) VashaUdacha7      VashaUdacha777 $66,480        $25
4.) Pmalek            Pmalek         $67,015.39     $25 


52. Post 66444357 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 20:27:13 CET 2026) in Electrum 4.7.0 released:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:21:47 PM
I will use this thread to announce the release of the new version of Electrum for Android and iOS.
You're talking about BlueWallet, not Electrum.


53. Post 66443953 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 18:22:25 CET 2026) in Betpanda.io Scam:
Quote from: T1HGO on Today at 09:41:27 AM
[...]
Quote from: holydarkness on February 23, 2026, 04:11:00 PM
Quote from: T1HGO on February 23, 2026, 12:15:27 AM
Summary of the Dispute
[...]

Just glancing over it as I know somewhere in that wall of text my name is being mentioned, uhh... what's the purpose of this... whatever this is? Is it a summary of a formal complaint you filed to court, or you simply pasted what you ask AI to summarize this thread?

Yes, i asked AI to deepsearch this thread and summarize it and reach a veredict. Yes, your name comes up, and i apologize if it bothers you. As for the purpose of this, is to continue to expose this dogshit scam. Why else would it be?

[...]

Well uhh, you do aware that they've gave their verdict and the case marked as resolved upon their explanation on post #100 and after the explanative post, none of the user you mentioned through the AI is pitching in to argue back, thus they understand and accept the explanation.

So, this part is kinda misleading,

Quote from: T1HGO on February 23, 2026, 12:15:27 AM
[...]

Community Opinions
Forum users (e.g., albon, Tręvoid, holydarkness, AHOYBRAUSE, Pmalek, Zwei) largely support T1HGO, criticizing Betpanda.io for vagueness, lack of proof, and a pattern of similar issues. Points raised:
[...]


54. Post 66442634 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 11:41:55 CET 2026) in Re:
Code:
Hero of Good: o_e_l_e_o
More than two years after he had to leave the forum, his posts still earn more Merit than most users. His legacy will help forum users for many years to come. He definitely left an indelible legacy.

Code:
Forum Ninja: TryNinja
Still the best candidate for this category, and not only because of his name. He's made finding older posts much more accessible, and I still use his site at least weekly.

Code:
Bitcoin Geek: nc50lc, Cricktor, stwenhao
The users above are #2-4 on my Sent Merit list, and I've seen their posts everywhere during the year. I often find myself unable to send more Merit because of the 50 per month limit. Those users are truely Bitcoin Geeks.

Code:
Best Event: Bitcointalk Community Awards
This, of course. Although I always feel like I can't do everyone justice because I'm terrible with names and don't have the time to re-read everything I've read in the past year. Last year I said I should take notes this year, unfortunately I slacked off and had to improvise again.

Code:
Best Project: PowerGlove
Last year I decided to call this member a "Project", and I'll do it again this year. I'm talking about his contributions on improving the forum. He announced he's stepping down, so this is my last chance to nominate him as Best Project.
You've made it to #1 on my Sent Merit list again, which is quite an accomplishment with 294 well-deserved Merits.

Code:
Discovery of the Year: stwenhao
Although not technically a Newbie, stwenhao made most of his contributions in 2025 and stood out this year. He thoroughly understands how Bitcoin works on a technical level.

Code:
Help Buster: Ultegra134, nutildah, lovesmayfamilis
Since I hate AI chatbot diarrhea with a passion, I'm nominating these users for their contributions to the AI Spam Report Reference Thread. In order of appearance above, they've contributed 224, 222 and 164 posts to that topic.

Code:
Craft Master:
I'm still thinking about this one.

Code:
Local Hero:
I'm only fluent in one local language, and that board is almost completely abandoned.

Code:
Miss Bitcointalk: Foxpup
Year after year after year Smiley

I partially (largely) based this list on my votes from last year.

I made a Top 50 of my sent Merit in 2025, to help me find back the right users:
Code:
     # Merit - userID - username
     1  294 - 3486361 - PowerGlove
     2  280 - 557798 - TryNinja
     3  265 - 317618 - nutildah
     4  258 - 1237156 - nc50lc
     5  242 - 3253914 - Cricktor
     6  163 - 1137579 - icopress
     7  162 - 2755792 - stwenhao
     8  140 - 359716 - ABCbits
     9  136 - 11425 - gmaxwell
    10  126 - 2739424 - NotATether
    11  116 - 995810 - hosemary
    12  114 - 112493 - Pmalek
    13  112 - 97582 - joker_josue
    14  108 - 1554927 - bitmover
    15  106 - 941526 - #BitcoinCore
    16  100 - 1285797 - GazetaBitcoin
    17  98 - 533583 - Lucius
    18  97 - 1410401 - dkbit98
    19  96 - 3540187 - apogio
    20  95 - 3373825 - paid2
    21  94 - 290195 - achow101
    22  90 - 1053119 - Halab
    23  82 - 85033 - d5000
    24  80 - 379147 - pooya87
    25  80 - 27470 - cygan
    26  78 - 2003859 - DireWolfM14
    27  72 - 2851928 - pbies
    28  70 - 3704391 - Satofan44
    29  70 - 314792 - examplens
    30  67 - 2836461 - Free
    31  66 - 84866 - ibminer
    32  59 - 971544 - Shishir99
    33  56 - 405464 - mocacinno
    34  56 - 1982152 - lovesmayfamilis
    35  55 - 35 - theymos
    36  54 - 998490 - AlcoHoDL
    37  54 - 2658890 - Rikafip
    38  52 - 60820 - DannyHamilton
    39  52 - 3440279 - OrangeFren
    40  52 - 1247226 - logfiles
    41  50 - 2307759 - TheArchaeologist
    42  47 - 2775483 - BlackHatCoiner
    43  46 - 991374 - Porfirii
    44  46 - 317557 - eXch
    45  46 - 1224889 - Becassine
    46  45 - 1852120 - fillippone
    47  44 - 3453140 - Meuserna
    48  44 - 209599 - somac.
    49  43 - 355846 - yahoo62278
    50  43 - 234771 - suchmoon


55. Post 66442587 (unedited backup) (by rishib) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 11:22:55 CET 2026) in [SERVICE] Blockrand: Double-Blind Randomness (Show HN #1) for Dice/Crash/Games:
Thanks for the feedback, @Pmalek. You’ve highlighted the two biggest hurdles: Inertia and Latency.

1. Why would casinos change?
You're right—they’re making money now. But they are also losing it to "Scam Accusations" and reputation damage. Blockrand isn't just about "fairness"; it’s Reputation Insurance. A casino using this can prove they can’t selectively enforce ToS based on the outcome. In a saturated market, that "Mathematically Impossible to Cheat" label is a massive competitive edge for attracting whales.

2. The 10-Second Wait
You're spot on—10s (we can reduce it a bit to say 6 sec) is too slow for "one-click" games. We solve this via Optimistic Commitment:
- The bet is locked to Round X instantly.
- The game "spins" or "rolls" immediately for UX.
- Settlement happens the millisecond the beacon is broadcast.

For high-frequency play, we are also prototyping VDF-based entropy to provide sub-second local results that remain verifiable against the Drand anchor.

Do you think whales would trade a few seconds of "settlement" delay for a 100% guarantee that the house isn't looking at the seed?


Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:01:42 AM
I received a PM to come and take a look at this proposal. Here are my comments.

Anything that makes gambling fairer and more transparent is a welcome move. Having said that, I don't see why the majority of online/crypto casinos would be on board with implementing a different system if the current one works well for them and makes them ridiculous amounts of money. Your randomness proposal would also have to undergo detailed and long testing before a serious casino would even consider implementing it. Still, the question remains whether they would ever agree to change. I don't think the online gambling industry suffers from a lack of clients even with this half-fair system, as you call it.

Then there is the question of the 10-seconds wait between two bets. Many bettors won't like it, especially not those who play fast-outcome, one-click games. I don't think patience is a big virtue among gamblers. Must this waiting time be 10 seconds? Is there a way to shorten it?


56. Post 66442390 (unedited backup) (by nemesis_incarnate) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 10:11:31 CET 2026) in ⚡⚡Toshi.bet No KYC⭐Up to 50% Loss Back 🚀 Instant VIP Perks 🎁 Deposit Bonuses⚡⚡:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 09:07:04 AM
Quote from: khaled0111 on February 23, 2026, 11:59:27 PM
I don’t have access to a desktop right now to test this and see if it works, but instead of clicking on "Ctrl + F", did you try opening the browser’s built-in "Find" feature from the browser menu?
Theoretically, this should trigger the browser’s search feature and not the casino’s.
Good suggestion and interestingly it worked. I didn't expect it would. CTRL+F is a keyboard shortcut to the browser's in-built search feature. In case of Chrome, they call it "Find & Edit." They basically achieve the same thing, but the issue here was that Toshi.bet assigned that keyboard shortcut to their own search option. However, the browser's find feature can still be activated in a different way.

Thanks!

Sometimes we have to think around the corners in order to get to the same result we want.

Thanks for khaled for finding a solution Smiley


57. Post 66442296 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 09:45:02 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
Quote from: Pmalek on February 23, 2026, 04:25:13 PM
Exactly. Even if you played a million rounds, that doesn't guarantee that you will reach the expected payouts based on the slot game's RTP. The fewer the rounds, the bigger the variations you will experience in the RTP rates.

Let's say you are playing a 95% RTP slot and you hit a 200x payout in a relatively short amount of time. You just made way more than what the game was supposed to give back to you. It's the same as if you lost 100% of your money after 20 played rounds. In that case, the game took all of your money and not an amount remotely close to its RTP. Both cases (where you hit a big multiplier and lose everything) are more likely to happen than the game giving you back 95 coins on a 100 coin deposit.

Like you said, you have to consider a sample size of millions and tens of millions of rounds. A single player is unlikely to experience a slot game's true RTP in his entire lifetime.
It's the theory and helpful for gambling practice too.

Your friend story is very insightful and interesting about a gambler who kind of understand the game theory, probability and try to do as best as he can to reduce risk of loss, increase chance of win, that's it. I guess that your friend did not intend to outsmart the slot machines, it's just he understood the game quite well and want to do something with as best control as he can. I am quite sure that it does not guarantee that he will surely win with his several playing rounds, just kind of having a little bit better chance if he is lucky enough.


58. Post 66441689 (unedited backup) (by famososMuertos) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 01:01:07 CET 2026) in 💧 Rainbet.com 💧 | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Competitive Rewards 💦:
Quote from: goodpunt on February 23, 2026, 05:20:12 AM
:///:::
Back to my bet please United don't let me down!


He didn’t disappoint, but he definitely made us suffer:  barely goal it in the 71st minute. (no bad)

It was my last bet of the weekend, which for many of us doesn’t always end on Sunday, but on Monday. Actually, weekends almost always start on Friday and end on Monday—although football has us betting from Monday to Sunday (that’s another story).

The only one who really “disappointed” was Real Madrid.



By the way, betting early always gives better odds @1.96 vs. @1.87


Quote from: Pmalek on February 22, 2026, 05:00:45 PM
I won a freebet on Rainbet some time ago. I decided to try my luck betting on the finals of the Olympic ice hockey competition and on Canada. The odds of 2.36 looked really nice and I though they would surely defeat the US team despite Crosby being out. Unfortunately that didn't happen. They were the better team throughout the match and had great opportunities to score a 2:1 goal during regular time. MacKinnon especially, but also Toews missed big opportunities. The match went into overtime and the US scored the game-winning goal not long after it started.

Better luck next time I guess.



There’s a phrase in poker that goes: "I lost, but I made the right move." What it means is that, in the long run, that move is profitable. And that logic applies to this particular bet—I also backed Canada. There were many variables in Canada’s favor, and the odds were very good relative to their chances of winning. I chose Canada in my bets, even in the BSFL.

We can’t live off @1.5 odds 😉 looking for value is part of the game (bets), and that match was the “right move.” It may sound illogical, but you’re not alone—we all took the Canada loss.


59. Post 66441678 (unedited backup) (by khaled0111) (scraped on Tue Feb 24 00:59:31 CET 2026) in ⚡⚡Toshi.bet No KYC⭐Up to 50% Loss Back 🚀 Instant VIP Perks 🎁 Deposit Bonuses⚡⚡:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:49:23 PM
@Toshi.bet
There is something that you can fix on your website.

Let's say I want to check your T&C to see something. For example, if my country is on your banned jurisdictions list. When I open the TOS, I can't run a search using the CTRL+F method because that immediately opens your casino's in-built search for games. Maybe there is a way around this (perhaps through Inspect Element), but I can't think of one from the top of my head.
I don’t have access to a desktop right now to test this and see if it works, but instead of clicking on Ctrl + F, did you try opening the browser’s built-in Find feature directly from the browser menu?
Theoretically, that should trigger the browser’s search function and not the casino’s in-built search.
I’m not sure if there’s a workaround for mobile users, though.


60. Post 66441260 (unedited backup) (by qidafei) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 22:44:25 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:11:58 AM
Quote from: UmerIdrees on February 22, 2026, 11:25:18 PM
But still even if we use cake wallet or unstoppable wallet, our USD Tether can still be frozen, true ?
Yes. Tether can freeze your USDT anywhere.

Quote from: qidafei on Today at 12:40:52 AM
Usually, I mostly use Trust Wallet. Does this also count as a non-custodial wallet?
Trust Wallet is non-custodial, but because it's closed-source, no one besides those close to the project know this for sure. It's got a really bad reputation and deserves to be called NON-Trust Wallet instead. I would never store anything of importance or value in it.
So, what wallets are trustworthy right now? I just checked Cake Wallet, but it only supports storing XRM. I have Bitcoin and ETH. Which wallet should I choose?


61. Post 66441095 (unedited backup) (by eternalgloom) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 22:06:07 CET 2026) in Seeking Business Co-Founder for Political Crypto Project:
Quote from: Pmalek on January 29, 2026, 08:23:52 AM
It makes more sense to tell the community what the project is really about than asking people to contact you in private just to find out more about it. By sharing the basics, you will at least get rid of DMs asking for more information and wasting both your time and theirs if they find out it's not something they want to participate in.

Ahh, nothing wrong with hiding actual math or algorithm but the main architecture of the project, tokenomics model and skeleton of the smart contract should be publicly available on GitHub and Lightpaper. In this quantum era, if an experienced builder sees someone saying 'DM for details' is nonsense.


62. Post 66440633 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 19:58:37 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ Bundesliga GOALFEST ⚽ 27 February:
* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love Free Bets  Smiley

Code:
Zwei
notblox1
Koal-84
klarki
Harkorede
Trofo
LFC_Bitcoin
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
buwaytress
jeremypwr
CLS63
Slissy
Woodie
hosemary
NeuroticFish
cryptofrka
Dump3er
KTChampions
Pmalek
mv1986
darxiaomi
famososMuertos
Mahdirakib
tiCeR
vivekdhyani1
goodpunt
hilariousandco
xandry
slaman29
SatoPrincess
leea-1334
mitchr4
VashaUdacha777
mole0815
ILuckyGuyI
Ryu_Ar1
Betwrong
Strongkored
xLays
jayce


63. Post 66440630 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 19:58:13 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ English Premier League GOALFEST ⚽ 27 February:
* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love Free Bets  Smiley

Code:
Zwei
notblox1
Koal-84
klarki
Harkorede
Trofo
LFC_Bitcoin
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
buwaytress
jeremypwr
CLS63
Slissy
Woodie
hosemary
NeuroticFish
cryptofrka
Dump3er
KTChampions
Pmalek
mv1986
darxiaomi
famososMuertos
Mahdirakib
tiCeR
vivekdhyani1
goodpunt
hilariousandco
xandry
slaman29
SatoPrincess
leea-1334
mitchr4
VashaUdacha777
mole0815
ILuckyGuyI
Ryu_Ar1
Betwrong
Strongkored
xLays
jayce


64. Post 66440625 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 19:57:55 CET 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ La Liga GOALFEST ⚽ 27 February :
* Rainbet reserves the right to delete/disqualify any prediction for any reason *
** The declared winners are final and up to our discretion **

Courtesy tag for those who love Free Bets  Smiley

Code:
Zwei
notblox1
Koal-84
klarki
Harkorede
Trofo
LFC_Bitcoin
BABY SHOES
Rikafip
buwaytress
jeremypwr
CLS63
Slissy
Woodie
hosemary
NeuroticFish
cryptofrka
Dump3er
KTChampions
Pmalek
mv1986
darxiaomi
famososMuertos
Mahdirakib
tiCeR
vivekdhyani1
goodpunt
hilariousandco
xandry
slaman29
SatoPrincess
leea-1334
mitchr4
VashaUdacha777
mole0815
ILuckyGuyI
Ryu_Ar1
Betwrong
Strongkored
xLays
jayce


65. Post 66440243 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 18:10:25 CET 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:
Nije bas Games & Rounds, ali nagrade su sasvim pristojne, a koliko vidim sa ovog lokala su samo Pmalek i dkbit98 glasali (i ja).

U pitanju je [Voting 2025] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
Trenutno je glasalo tek oko 100 clanova, a najavljuje se format nagrada za 50 najsrecnijih i to:
20 x $150
30 x $100
Zatvaranje glasanja je 28 februar.
Sanse da dobitak uopste nisu male.

Ovde se slazem sa menadzerom. Pisu se reviews i za mnogo manji novac, a ovde zaitsa nema posebnog opterecenja.
Prenosim njegov zadnji update
Quote from: icopress on Today at 12:48:57 AM
So, there are also 6 days left for editing (28 Feb max). We only have about 100 applications, so the distribution will actually look something like this:

20 x $150
30 x $100

Or I'll just put together a list of all the long answers that will be eligible for a $250 x10 prize and a list of short answers that will be eligible for $50 x 10 prizes.

People write casino and exchange reviews for $50, spending an hour or more... but they overlook... putting in 5 minutes of time has a 30% chance of getting $100-150 for one post (in fact, I think that's too generous an offer).

But if someone thinks their vote will be counted based on writing one line under each nomination, they're mistaken. That's what I mean by a detailed answer. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569520.msg66342957#msg66342957


66. Post 66439666 (unedited backup) (by Unsoldier) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 15:36:55 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
Quote from: Eternad on Today at 09:47:11 AM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:18:27 AM
Quote from: Eternad on February 22, 2026, 11:40:25 AM
I first knew this fallacy on physical casino slot games that some veteran players keep watching players on slot and wait for the slot games that doesn’t pay even after the previous player spins a lot.
I have a friend who does that. He is a poker guy and visits physical casinos to play poker, but he also likes to try his luck on slots. Before he starts playing at a machine, he will sit and watch to see which of the slots pay out money to previous players. He will not use those. His argument is: if a machine hasn't paid out anything for a while, but some others have, you should deposit at one that hasn't. The time has come for it to trigger a big win.

This method is very popular in my country mostly old man and woman sitting on the sidelines like a vulture waiting a losing slot players finally gave up their machine.

They have good experience doing this method that’s why many follow this trick. I don’t know if this is applicable on slot games but I think this is the basis on most cases.

Some user hunt cold slot games as an alternative.

I’ve heard of this slot machine method before. However, I’ve googled it, and the search results showed plenty of articles explaining why it doesn't work. That is why this strategy is nothing more than an illusion. Modern slot machines operate based on an RNG (Random Number Generator). Their processors generate thousands of numbers per second, and the result of the next spin is completely unrelated to the previous one. The machine doesn't 'remember' if it just hit a jackpot or, conversely, has been 'silent' for three hours. To the machine, every button press is an entirely new lottery. So, these people are guided by intuition that seems logical to them, but in reality, it contradicts how modern technology actually works.


67. Post 66439580 (unedited backup) (by cLoazyL) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 15:18:13 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: qidafei on February 21, 2026, 09:54:18 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on February 21, 2026, 04:36:40 PM
Quote from: SamReomo on February 21, 2026, 12:59:08 PM
I believe it's better to go for Dai option than choosing LUSD as Dai is still accepted on many platforms and its liquidity is also higher than LUSD. Both of those are better when we compare those to USDT, but people often use or prefer USDT because it's accepted everywhere. I also use USDT for trading at centralized exchanges and to be honest, I've not yet faced any issue with it. However, I would never withdraw funds in form of USDT because for me Bitcoin works better than others.
USDT is the most battle-tested. Let's call it that. It remains the most popular option worldwide. But like I said previously. If you still have access to USDT, DAI and some other non-compliant stablecoins (according to EU regulators) on the CEXs you use, that means you are not residing in the European Union. EU citizens can't use either of the two on CEXs. Unless it's a smaller exchange or the CEX doesn't care, of course. USDC is the most popular EU-compliant stablecoin. 
Thank you everyone for sharing — I’ve learned a lot. I also looked into DAI. It seems much better than LUSD, because on many apps you can purchase DAI directly.

Now I’m thinking about something: if I use SageSwap.io to exchange my Bitcoin for DAI and then deposit it into my centralized exchange (CEX), is there a risk that my account could be frozen?

From what I previously understood, whether you receive ETH or Bitcoin, there is always a chance of receiving tokens that have been flagged — for example, high-risk or tainted tokens. That could potentially lead to an account being frozen.

I’ve never used DAI before, so I’d like to understand the situation better.

If you receive BTC/ETH or another cryptocurrency with a high AML and you sent it to centralized exchange like Binance your account will be blocked and it won't be so easy to unblock it. You can always check the AML of the cryptocurrencies you received there are bots on tg for it.


68. Post 66438735 (unedited backup) (by Eternad) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 10:47:13 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:18:27 AM
Quote from: Eternad on February 22, 2026, 11:40:25 AM
I first knew this fallacy on physical casino slot games that some veteran players keep watching players on slot and wait for the slot games that doesn’t pay even after the previous player spins a lot.
I have a friend who does that. He is a poker guy and visits physical casinos to play poker, but he also likes to try his luck on slots. Before he starts playing at a machine, he will sit and watch to see which of the slots pay out money to previous players. He will not use those. His argument is: if a machine hasn't paid out anything for a while, but some others have, you should deposit at one that hasn't. The time has come for it to trigger a big win.

This method is very popular in my country mostly old man and woman sitting on the sidelines like a vulture waiting a losing slot players finally gave up their machine.

They have good experience doing this method that’s why many follow this trick. I don’t know if this is applicable on slot games but I think this is the basis on most cases.

Some user hunt cold slot games as an alternative.


69. Post 66438552 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 09:41:25 CET 2026) in Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:18:27 AM
I have a friend who does that. He is a poker guy and visits physical casinos to play poker, but he also likes to try his luck on slots. Before he starts playing at a machine, he will sit and watch to see which of the slots pay out money to previous players. He will not use those. His argument is: if a machine hasn't paid out anything for a while, but some others have, you should deposit at one that hasn't. The time has come for it to trigger a big win.
He just tries to play the probability game with assumption that if previous players did not win and get winning payments, perhaps it will turn to be winning round when he steps in and plays with that slot machine. He assumes that if other previous players won and got payment, there will be less probability for him to play, win and get payment if he actually uses his money for playing.

The assumption can be right but perhaps he will not wait a long time enough like a long time with many rounds of playing from previous players until he takes action. It's basically the probability game is based on big sample, not small one, so even in theory it is right, in his practice it would turn to be quite wrong.


70. Post 66438347 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Mon Feb 23 08:07:49 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Quote from: UmerIdrees on February 22, 2026, 11:25:18 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on February 22, 2026, 05:09:49 PM
Quote from: SageSwap on February 22, 2026, 08:38:36 AM
To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.
There aren't that many quality multi-coin software wallets that tick the important boxes, such as non-custodial and open-source. Exodus wallet only ticks one of them. Regardless, I have never felt like this is a good wallet. Every now and then, stories have pooped up involving mysterious "hacks" and the disappearance of funds from Exodus. I wouldn't want to use it. Cake Wallet and Unstoppable Wallet are perhaps a better pair of software wallets for multi-coin holders.  

But still even if we use cake wallet or unstoppable wallet, our USD Tether can still be frozen, true ? I think it is by design that tether can freeze USDT from any wallet or exchange

Yes, but that was in response to the question of whether a centralized exchange could freeze BTC.

Quote from: qidafei on Today at 12:40:52 AM
Quote from: Pmalek on February 22, 2026, 05:09:49 PM
Quote from: SageSwap on February 22, 2026, 08:38:36 AM
To ensure that they are never frozen, you must use non-custodial wallets such as Cake Wallet or Exodus.
There aren't that many quality multi-coin software wallets that tick the important boxes, such as non-custodial and open-source. Exodus wallet only ticks one of them. Regardless, I have never felt like this is a good wallet. Every now and then, stories have pooped up involving mysterious "hacks" and the disappearance of funds from Exodus. I wouldn't want to use it. Cake Wallet and Unstoppable Wallet are perhaps a better pair of software wallets for multi-coin holders. 
Usually, I mostly use Trust Wallet. Does this also count as a non-custodial wallet?

I know Cake Wallet — I’ve used it before. When I stored my XRM, I used Cake Wallet.

Unfortunately, despite being non-custodial, Trust Wallet is not trustworthy. A few weeks ago, they were hacked and users lost several million dollars.

Earlier, I wrote that Exodus might also be a good option, but I take that back and also consider it a poor option after they stop support XMR. I really don't like that.

Cake Wallet is really great, but only their wallet, the rest of their services need more improvement.