Eu li a biografia dele, o Pai dele espancava ele e o irmaõ, Kimbal Musk, na infância. O primeiro grande negocio dele, antes até do Paypal foi a Zip2, e ela fornecia guias de cidades e diretórios online para jornais. Com a venda ele foi para a Paypal. Depos Tesla, Space, Boring, A solar que não lembro o nome. E todos com o mesmo objetivo: Inovar na área.

Então ele ser trilionário é válido pela história de seguidas inovações em nichos relativamente longe um dos outros. Mas sobre o valuation da spaceX eu acho que está bastante inflado, dado o lucro que demonstraram nos prospectos. Mas, obvio que todos querem entrar pelo futuro dela e pelo histórico do que ele fez na Tesla. E nisso eu acho que vai ser muito bom.

Para o Satoshi a comunidade devia ser voluntária as mudanças e aceitar como um todo. A regra de 95% foi criada pela comunidade, não por Satoshi, para dar maior garantias que assim seja, em 2013 se não me engano.

Basicamente o que o Satoshi dizia, é que a maioria dos utilizadores (nós) tinha de usar o novo software com a mudança na altura do bloco X, caso contrário a mudança não acontecia. Caso a maioria não usasse essa mudança ela não entraria em vigor.

Por isso normalmente uma mudança só entra em vigor se 95% do hash da rede aceitar, para evitar problemas de fork.
O que o bip110 veio dizer é que basta 55% para entrar em vigor, com um espaço de um ano para isso acontecer.

Mas, se a maioria dos nodes não aceitar a mudança, mesmo que os mineradores queiram implementar não vão conseguir.
É um pouco semelhante ao que aconteceu quando foi a implementação do Segwit.

Concordo que o Ordinals são um ponto negativo. Mas a forma como querem resolver, não resolve, apenas minimiza o seu impacto. Desmotiva? Não sei.

Como o bitmover disse, há um ano que estamos com taxas no mínimo histórico. O que impede alguém enviar um jpg para a rede em 1000 transações? Nada, é barato e cumpre o objetivo. Mais dificuldade técnica? Talvez, mas com o IA isso é feito em minutos.

Gostei, não sei porque a comunidade está contra... pra mim esse é o caminho para fazer o Bitcoin servir novamente para aquilo que realmente foi criado: "dinheiro eletrônico p2p", então tem o meu apoio para eliminar essas M**** de Odinals e Runes para uma outra rede já que eles não quiseram fazer isso antes.

Com certeza que eu também vou aproveitar da mesma forma que tu falou, porque assim como foi com o BCH, essa vai ser a única vantagem que vou tirar do fork.

Problemas.... acho que isso não vai durar mais do que um ano, e depois disso volta o congestionamento.

Exactly! Right now, there are a lot of platforms, tools, or applications that are already relevant, where it can be done already by existing AI applications; some of these are just wrappers of other AI/LLMs.

But I think what OP means here is that we must learn how to do data analysis or clean data without using A.I.? I'm confused with the image.

E os silent payments (BIP-352) não são exatamente uma técnica voltada para privacidade?

Ao falar em pagamentos silenciosos, é essencial entender o propósito por trás do conceito, que é, justamente, aumentar a privacidade das transações.

Discordo, eu acho que entrada/saída é bastante claro..

Hoje os maiores sites usam essa tradução:


Mempool: https://mempool.space/pt/tx/4d9478242ae458995d5ff510148bde50f0cde37e993266eb8be72627d0faa200


Blockchair: https://blockchair.com/pt/bitcoin/transaction/d2785bd6312150bf37ad6f0a6473ca5c2630051a916683d29b54fc95b3af2d17

É um termo que existe tradução e facilita a leitura.

A Arkham infelizmente não tem português como idioma, mas se botar em espanhol fica "entradas y salidas".. então também traduziriam para "entrada/saída" em PTBR:


Arkham: https://arkm.com/explorer/tx/15f550117d99209ed8e2c079589d80c41074366acb8121d667ff5136dab549d1

---

Sobre o assunto em si, também achei muito complicado, assim como já havia achado no outro tópico sobre carteiras de software.

Pedi para o ChatGPT fazer um infográfico simples usando o texto do OP para ver se ajuda.. às vezes só desenhando para entender.. eis o resultado:

Mas como são gerados esses endereços?
Por cada vez que alguém envia para o endereço, gera um novo?

Já estou baralhado. 

The winner is- IIrik11
Payment sent- 3e1e275bf8ce564bd28e07f19b9fc5c6c9521d99375008b96e2e6db9ae353108

Verify

I was talking about the equity holders or those employees who's offered to work with a stock option on Space X.

As well as the pre-IPO investors. I guess that I've used the wrong word about saying about long time stock owners instead of pre-ipo and employees who also owns a share/equity of the company.

Either way, I'll wait for its dump before I buy.

Eu tenho u memprego de dia e outro de noite (aqui)
Dá pra ganhar mais que muita gente... mas entendo seu ponto, sem contar o tempo que um trabalhador passa no deslocamento de casa/trabalho/casa... trabalho novamente??? sem chance!
Isso funciona pra PJ e ajuda ainda mais para quem consegue trabalhar remotamente.


Por aqui, muitas empresas estão precisando de vagas, mas da mesma forma que tem empresário querendo pagar misérias por trabalho quase escravo, também tem muita gente só "coçando o saco" porque preferem receber auxílio do governo do que trabalhar no pesado por uma miséria.
Essa lei vai ferrar empresários que já não tem margem, não vai reduzir os salários atuais, porém quem pular fora e quiser entrar, vai entrar com valores menores, porque isso não vai sair da margem do patrão, que quase não tem, vai sair do salário e benefícios que existe, ou então do aumento de preço dos produtos e serviços.   

A chegada da Starlink no interior do Brasil foi brutal para melhorar a qualidade de vida.

Tenho conhecidos do interior que pagavam R$ 400 por mês por uma internet super limitada, com 20 Mbps de velocidade de download e latência de quase 800ms. A internet caia ou ficava instável quando chovia na região.

Hoje pagam R$ 189 por mês em uma internet rápida e com baixa latência.

E achas que apenas 25% da população trabalha?
Infelizmente os outros 50% devem de receber sem declarar.

Agora, esses números são sempre muito subjetivos. Tanto os que dizem quantos trabalham, como os que dizem quantos são ativos, como se existe ou não o pleno emprego.

Vai tudo depender de como se olha para os números.

Yes, that's the one that I've seen. It's listed in Bybit.

--> https://announcements.bybit.com/en/article/spcx-is-now-live-on-bybit-alpha-blt7ee7d273a3f4ee48/

But isn't this like the wrapped bitcoin? since it has got a contract on the solana network and said as an "on-chain asset".

--> https://solscan.io/token/SPCXxcqXj6e5dJDVNovHN8744zkbhM2bYudU45BimGb

I don't think this is what OP is looking for. There's a possibility that this can depeg from the actual space x stock we don't know when.

I also think so that it's overpriced but it gets interesting when there's a 14%+ right now.

I guess the long time stock owners of it haven't dumped yet.

Tem algumas palavras que, na minha opinião, nem precisariam ser traduzidas, por fazerem mais sentido em inglês, como input/output, sender (não gosto de “remetente”, mas é a melhor das opções  ) e blockchain, por exemplo, além de outras.


Sugestão aceita  
De fato deu mais sentido ao texto.

Obrigado!

I also some many people claiming the funds are moving from Bitcoin into SpaceX but it's hard to ignore the hype already around spaceX and that Elon Musk has become the first trillionaire all of that are making people believe that this is an opportunity of a lifetime for them especially those who think this is early Bitcoin days opportunity all over again.
But everything surrounding the IPO from exchanges going against their long standing rules and with documented cases of owing funds is this actually a good time to liquidate your Bitcoin to purchase SpaceX.

Já subiu para US$ 1,2 trilhão.. o Bitcoin está em US$ 1,3 trilhão.. daqui a pouco o Musk passa o Bitcoin..

Será que o BTC não está muito barato? um único homem vale mais que um ativo digital, escasso, anti-censura, etc


Se você quiser se divertir, pode olhar o comentário dos esquerditas neste tuíte do g1: https://x.com/g1/status/2065470400515957180

Querem acabar com a fome e moradores de rua

I tired with chrome and brave. After clicking on Submit, it keeps rolling. Nothing changes. I can't even see from the link you provided.

IA está puxando muito esses números para cima.. empresas de hardware estão no seu melhor momento, além da Nvidia também tem outras tantas no mesmo caminho.. SanDisk (que faz SSDs) subiu 4.660% em um ano, Micron (que faz memórias) subiu outros 795% no mesmo período.. só para citar algumas.. Samsung (faz de tudo), que é da Coreia, 489%..

Sem falar empresas de software e todas outras que estão sabendo aproveitar essa tecnologia.. o próprio Saylor fala que o capital está migrando para IA.. realmente é uma oportunidade única.

Aqui no Brasil tem o que? a Positivo que está no negativo? -15,2%

SpaceX está indo bem até agora, pensava que cairia na estreia.

I'll update the difference between inclusions and exclusions too:

     1. 664 (=674 inclusions - 10 exclusions): theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (14550 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 333 (=355 inclusions - 22 exclusions): LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (21035 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 266 (=297 inclusions - 31 exclusions): Hhampuz (Trust: +142 / =4 / -0) (6704 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 221 (=282 inclusions - 61 exclusions): OgNasty (Trust: +74 / =3 / -5) (5390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 198 (=199 inclusions - 1 exclusions): Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (2855 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 182 (=188 inclusions - 6 exclusions): minerjones (Trust: +124 / =0 / -0) (3283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 159 (=198 inclusions - 39 exclusions): hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (1896 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 155 (=178 inclusions - 23 exclusions): gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (9878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 148 (=155 inclusions - 7 exclusions): philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (11021 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 147 (=164 inclusions - 17 exclusions): yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (4384 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 147 (=156 inclusions - 9 exclusions): DarkStar_ (Trust: +61 / =1 / -0) (2288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 138 (=147 inclusions - 9 exclusions): dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 133 (=133 inclusions - 0 exclusions): satoshi (Trust: +40 / =0 / -0) (8662 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 132 (=147 inclusions - 15 exclusions): Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (2042 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 126 (=159 inclusions - 33 exclusions): icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (12687 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 122 (=205 inclusions - 83 exclusions): suchmoon (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (8540 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 122 (=123 inclusions - 1 exclusions): DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (11356 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 110 (=111 inclusions - 1 exclusions): John (John K.) (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 101 (=102 inclusions - 1 exclusions): fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (20787 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 98 (=107 inclusions - 9 exclusions): EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (2157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 95 (=96 inclusions - 1 exclusions): krogothmanhattan (Trust: +93 / =1 / -0) (4198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 93 (=98 inclusions - 5 exclusions): Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3506 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 93 (=179 inclusions - 86 exclusions): The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (6340 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 93 (=120 inclusions - 27 exclusions): Blazed (Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 92 (=96 inclusions - 4 exclusions): mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1763 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 91 (=97 inclusions - 6 exclusions): CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (5134 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 88 (=92 inclusions - 4 exclusions): BadBear (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 87 (=115 inclusions - 28 exclusions): lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (5676 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 85 (=108 inclusions - 23 exclusions): o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (18895 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 82 (=104 inclusions - 22 exclusions): HostFat (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (311 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 80 (=82 inclusions - 2 exclusions): achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (6738 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 78 (=84 inclusions - 6 exclusions): SebastianJu (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (83 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 78 (=110 inclusions - 32 exclusions): Tomatocage (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (239 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 74 (=79 inclusions - 5 exclusions): SaltySpitoon (Trust: +21 / =1 / -1) (1163 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 73 (=88 inclusions - 15 exclusions): Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (4115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 72 (=100 inclusions - 28 exclusions): qwk (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (2540 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 71 (=71 inclusions - 0 exclusions): -ck (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 70 (=80 inclusions - 10 exclusions): zazarb (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 69 (=77 inclusions - 8 exclusions): xandry (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4924 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 68 (=79 inclusions - 11 exclusions): TheFuzzStone (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (942 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 66 (=74 inclusions - 8 exclusions): DannyHamilton (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (4414 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 66 (=69 inclusions - 3 exclusions): jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (6234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 65 (=71 inclusions - 6 exclusions): Lesbian Cow (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (758 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 65 (=68 inclusions - 3 exclusions): willi9974 (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (2975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 62 (=95 inclusions - 33 exclusions): LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (11898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 62 (=84 inclusions - 22 exclusions): JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (13579 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 62 (=65 inclusions - 3 exclusions): phantastisch (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 60 (=101 inclusions - 41 exclusions): owlcatz (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (1036 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 59 (=64 inclusions - 5 exclusions): Little Mouse (Trust: +48 / =2 / -0) (3703 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 59 (=63 inclusions - 4 exclusions): Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (8059 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 58 (=98 inclusions - 40 exclusions): TECSHARE (Trust: +34 / =9 / -1) (1108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 58 (=74 inclusions - 16 exclusions): CanaryInTheMine (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 57 (=80 inclusions - 23 exclusions): AB de Royse777 (Trust: +44 / =4 / -2) (4301 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 55 (=58 inclusions - 3 exclusions): Sampey (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (40 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 54 (=60 inclusions - 6 exclusions): Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2940 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 54 (=115 inclusions - 61 exclusions): nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (10040 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 52 (=52 inclusions - 0 exclusions): irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (735 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 50 (=79 inclusions - 29 exclusions): The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (2584 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 48 (=57 inclusions - 9 exclusions): DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (6857 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 46 (=49 inclusions - 3 exclusions): greenplastic (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 46 (=47 inclusions - 1 exclusions): hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4592 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 46 (=46 inclusions - 0 exclusions): sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 46 (=46 inclusions - 0 exclusions): OmegaStarScream (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (6411 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 45 (=83 inclusions - 38 exclusions): DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (5735 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 45 (=54 inclusions - 9 exclusions): coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 45 (=53 inclusions - 8 exclusions): Stunna (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (287 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 45 (=49 inclusions - 4 exclusions): Goran_ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2572 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 45 (=46 inclusions - 1 exclusions): Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 44 (=54 inclusions - 10 exclusions): dkbit98 (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (8706 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 44 (=51 inclusions - 7 exclusions): TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (9976 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 44 (=47 inclusions - 3 exclusions): chronicsky (Trust: +40 / =1 / -0) (391 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 44 (=46 inclusions - 2 exclusions): cygan (Trust: +62 / =2 / -0) (11594 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 44 (=45 inclusions - 1 exclusions): El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (15571 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 43 (=54 inclusions - 11 exclusions): YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (1898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 43 (=46 inclusions - 3 exclusions): malevolent (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (728 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 42 (=57 inclusions - 15 exclusions): examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (3706 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 42 (=50 inclusions - 8 exclusions): Gavin Andresen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1491 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 42 (=45 inclusions - 3 exclusions): yxt (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (116 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 41 (=44 inclusions - 3 exclusions): shasan (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (1457 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 41 (=42 inclusions - 1 exclusions): casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 40 (=41 inclusions - 1 exclusions): julerz12 (Trust: +12 / =6 / -0) (1321 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 39 (=47 inclusions - 8 exclusions): chimk (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (714 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 39 (=41 inclusions - 2 exclusions): ICOEthics (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (892 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 38 (=42 inclusions - 4 exclusions): babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (4668 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 38 (=41 inclusions - 3 exclusions): igebotz (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (2295 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 37 (=52 inclusions - 15 exclusions): EcuaMobi (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (529 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 37 (=47 inclusions - 10 exclusions): Dabs (Trust: +7 / =2 / -2) (920 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 37 (=42 inclusions - 5 exclusions): monbux (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (29 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 37 (=41 inclusions - 4 exclusions): mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (3584 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 37 (=40 inclusions - 3 exclusions): SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (3096 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 36 (=53 inclusions - 17 exclusions): monkeynuts (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (259 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 36 (=47 inclusions - 11 exclusions): witcher_sense (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (4440 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 36 (=44 inclusions - 8 exclusions): NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (9780 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 36 (=36 inclusions - 0 exclusions): dbshck (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 35 (=51 inclusions - 16 exclusions): GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (9838 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 35 (=37 inclusions - 2 exclusions): poptop (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (746 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    97. 35 (=36 inclusions - 1 exclusions): Bthd (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2608 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    98. 34 (=35 inclusions - 1 exclusions): TookDk (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (62 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    99. 32 (=38 inclusions - 6 exclusions): MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +59 / =0 / -0) (3457 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   100. 32 (=36 inclusions - 4 exclusions): Charles-Tim (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (6392 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   101. 31 (=38 inclusions - 7 exclusions): bobita (Trust: neutral) (1083 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   102. 31 (=34 inclusions - 3 exclusions): holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1392 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   103. 30 (=82 inclusions - 52 exclusions): 1miau (Trust: +7 / =9 / -0) (7613 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   104. 30 (=70 inclusions - 40 exclusions): Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2788 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   105. 30 (=50 inclusions - 20 exclusions): TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   106. 30 (=41 inclusions - 11 exclusions): tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (2615 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   107. 30 (=34 inclusions - 4 exclusions): ABCbits (Trust: neutral) (9104 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   108. 30 (=34 inclusions - 4 exclusions): bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (7484 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   109. 30 (=32 inclusions - 2 exclusions): FatFork (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2722 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   110. 30 (=31 inclusions - 1 exclusions): wheelz1200 (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   111. 30 (=30 inclusions - 0 exclusions): buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   112. 30 (=30 inclusions - 0 exclusions): monocolor (Trust: neutral) (121 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   113. 29 (=45 inclusions - 16 exclusions): teeGUMES (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (978 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   114. 29 (=43 inclusions - 14 exclusions): Rmcdermott927 (Trust: +22 / =1 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   115. 29 (=38 inclusions - 9 exclusions): mikeywith (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (7186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   116. 29 (=31 inclusions - 2 exclusions): Yaremi (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (160 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   117. 29 (=30 inclusions - 1 exclusions): deeperx (Trust: #  +1 / =0 / -0) (386 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   118. 28 (=45 inclusions - 17 exclusions): sapta (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (217 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   119. 28 (=31 inclusions - 3 exclusions): logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (2297 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   120. 28 (=29 inclusions - 1 exclusions): buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (3830 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

https://talkimg.com/images/2026/06/15/U1aZta.png

working for me

I just tried and it seems bitmover's tool isnt working
Can you please check @bitmover?

Oh thanks so much for bringing this up here and good luck to Netherlands as they go head to head with Japan.

Not until this post I wasn't aware of Luckycoin predictions thread, and this is nice and welcoming from the marketing team of this casino.

I will head straight to make my submission on the thread and test how far my luck will take me.

Раффл от LuckyCoin: LuckyCoin.com FREE raffle round#6 | Prize pool $100, 10 winners



Как принять участие?

• выбрать свободный слот и указать свой юзернейм LuckyCoin
• отправить заявку в эту тему

Если писали  в ANN Lucky Coin, то можете выбрать еще один слот в раффле (пост должен быть за 5 дней до анонса раффла).

Формат заявки:

Призовые:


Победители будут определены через инструмент Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager.

ANN LuckyCoin: LuckyCoin.com - The Casino with Zero to hide - now live in Beta mode

 RULES

---

• Your Bitcointalk account must be at least a Member account
• Pick a SLOT you like.  Last date to make your pick: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
• You can pick a 2ND ADDITIONAL SLOT if you contributed with a constructive comments in the Vega Bet ANN topic WITHIN 5 DAYS BEFORE THIS RAFFLE ANNOUNCEMENT.
  (In this case make sure you add comment link with your entry)
• You can pick a 3RD ADDITIONAL SLOT if you have a Vega Bet account which had at least $100 successful deposit. Don't have an account yet? Click here and register.
  
  • Deposit must not be more than 3 days old from the date you entered in this raffle
  • Taking three slots WITHOUT a Vega Bet minimum deposit will disqualify your winning
• We will find the winners using Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on my Telegram group
• My decisions are final, you must follow the Vega Bet Terms
• You will receive reward in your Vega Bet BTC account

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -
11   -
12   -
13   -
14   -
15   -
16   -
17   -
18   -
19   -
20   -
21   -
22   -
23   -
24   -
25   -
26   -
27   -
28   -
29   -
30   -
31   -
32   -
33   -
34   -
35   -
36   -
37   -
38   -
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   -
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   -
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   -
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   -
67   -
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   -
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   -
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   -

 ENTER

---

---

 RULES

---

• Your Bitcointalk account must be at least a Member account
• Pick a SLOT you like.  Last date to book your slot: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
  (Do not have an account with LuckyCoin? Register using the url: https://go.luckycoin.com/click?o=1&a=6&c=3&link_id=2)
• If you have a constructive comment on the LuckyCoin Casino & Sportsbook ANN thread within 5 days before this raffle announcement then - you can pick a 2ND ADDITIONAL SLOT.
  (In this case make sure you add comment link with your entry)
• You can not edit your entry. If necessary then remove the old entry and make a new one.
• We will find the winners using Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on the 💰 R7 Bounty Hunters - Telegram Chat
• My decisions are final, you must follow the LuckyCoin Terms
• You will receive reward in your LuckyCoin account

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -
11   -
12   -
13   -
14   -
15   -
16   -
17   -
18   -
19   -
20   -
21   -
22   -
23   -
24   -
25   -
26   -
27   -
28   -
29   -
30   -
31   -
32   -
33   -
34   -
35   -
36   -
37   -
38   -
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   -
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   -
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   -
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   -
67   -
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   -
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   -
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   -

 ENTER

---

---

Here is our winners of Vega bet free raffle round #10 -


Verify
Congratulations to the winners, we have 2 winners this week.
Best of luck for next round, stay in touch.

We have our winners of this week's free raffle. Check below -


Verify
Congrats to the winners of LuckyCoin free raffle round #5. Best of luck for next round.

Ruim é ter uma potencia estrangeira interferindo nisso. Ruim é que pode atingir pessoas e instituições que podem não ter nada a ver com os crimes dos "terroristas". Ruim é bloquearem ativos dessas instituições e pessoas inocentes pagarem por isso.

Eu quero mais que a bandidagem seja presa e cumpra pena no Brasil. E não fujam para outros países para não cumprirem as penas impostas no Brasil.
Como tem vários criminosos brasileiros escondidos nos EUA e tem até uma criminosa acoitada na Itália.

Justiça brasileira tem que ser respeitada.

In future most countries especially the developed countries will do such type of tokenization of their real world assets. it'll be fun to see  the crypto-token version of real world assets and those of stocks. I believe that will make it easy for many people to buy those stocks in token form, but to be honest such a thing won't happen anytime soon.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 14512 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 9833 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5263 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1763 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2788 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4665 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2800 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2725 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 9736 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2074 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2497 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 503 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6563 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1896 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2975 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 6841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3695 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 735 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 4376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11347 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11891 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2763 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (62) 20978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 6333 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9946 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4064 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 452 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1492 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3812 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3514 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6765 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +93 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4194 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4578 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 15543 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3484 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (37) 12640 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2295 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2071 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9828 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2605 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3524 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7467 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3244 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3412 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20752 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2801 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2584 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5693 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +48 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3668 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1897 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1434 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4064 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 837 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1145 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5610 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8048 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1871 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9775 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1585 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5289 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9813 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3486 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3373858: n0nce (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (5) 6068 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +40 / =0 / -0) (8659 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 5797: grue (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (494 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

yes true rwa is next and im looking for it.

Nesses casos, podia limitar as ultimas 1000.
Claro que o resultado não seria bem o mesmo.

A única forma de ultrapassar isso, seria em casos específicos você guardar um log do ponto anterior verificado.
Imagina, ele verifica até 4000 movimentos, depois guarda um log com valor calculado e data do ultimo movimento até ao momento. Depois, a nova pesquisa, volta a verificar a partir desse momento.

Eu sei, falar é fácil, na pratica é diferente. Mas, fica a ideia.

That's right. Very good, I'm already using it on TalkImg.

Thank you for your effort and hard work.

Orihinal na akda ni: 1miau
Orihinal na akda:  Make sure to avoid wasting BTC for too high fees – step by step guide (Electrum)

---

---

Sa bawat transaction sa Bitcoin ay kailangan ng bayad. Ito ay importante dahil kailangang mababa ang patunay hangga't maaari para dumating ang transaksiyon sa papaldahan nila ng naaayon sa oras. Ang bilis ng transaksiyon ay depende sa kung magkano ang binayad dito. Ang fees ay tinatawag na Satoshi per byte (sat / byte). Mas mataas na bayad ng sat / byte, mas mabilis ang transaksiyon na maiilagay ito sa susunod na block. Ang mga miners ang pipili ng transaksiyon depende sa laki ng transaction fee (sat / byte). Ito ay lohikal, dahil ang mga miners ay hindi lang makakatanggap ng block reward kundi pati na rin ang transaction fee sa lahat ng transaksiyon ay kasama sa naminang block.

Hindi lahat ng wallet ay papayagan kang i-adjust ng transaction fee at sa mga maaari ay madalas nilang ginagawa ay ung simpleng default settings (o di kaya ay yung pinaka mahal). Ang isang magandang wallet ay papayagan kang ilagay ng transaction fee tulad ng Electrum.

Pagkatapos mong magpalit ng settings, isa sa pinakamahalaga ay malaman mo ang ideyal na halaga ng transaction fee, kung saan ito makikita sa maaasahan at tumpak na websites. Pero kailangan ay maaari mong palitan ang mga fees.

Para sa gabay na ito, ginagamit ko ito Electrum at ang Mempool by Jochen Hoenicke.
Ngayong malapit kana onting hakbang na lang para makatipid ka sa halaga ng Bitcoin:

1.

Una, buksan mo ang iyong Electrum. Ngayon, simulan natin maging madaling gamitin ang iyong wallet sa paggamit ng mga shortcut. Ngayon pindutin ang view sa may kaliwang itaas na bahagi at pindutin ang shortcut na gusto mong lumabas, tulad ng sa imahe sa ibaba.
Sa gabay na ito ay pinili ko lahat-lahat.

---

2.

Para sa mga older version ng Electrum, maaari ninyo edit ang fees manwal mula sa Electrum gamit ang tools and preferences sa menu, gayunpaman halos lahat ng bagong version ay hindi na kaya. Para lang mapalitan ninyo ang fees ay kailangan ninyong subukang gumawa ng transaksiyon. Ngayon ang kailangan nyo na lang gawin ay lagyan ang mga detalye tulad ng wallet address at kung magkano bago pindutin ang pay. At lalabas ang window na ito

---

3.

Ngayon makikita ninyo at maaari kayong mag-ayos ng fee gamit ang slider kung saan hindi sapat. Para ma-edit ang inyong mga fees ay pindutin lang ang icon na nakasaad sa ibabang imahe.

---

4.

Ngayon kung kayo ay tapos na sa step 3, ang maliit na window bar sa ibaba na may tsek ay maaaring pindutin sa setting at lalabas ang mga ito

---

5.

Ngayon, ang kailangan mong gawin ay piliin ang opsiyon na gusto mo sa iyong transaksiyon. Siguraduhing piliin mong mabuti ang Edit fees manually.

---

6.

Ngayon mapapansin ninyo na may dumagdag na slider at mayroon na tayong dalawang checkbox para magpalit ng fee tulad ng asa imahe sa ibaba. Gamit ang box na may highlighted na green sa ibaba, maaari kang magpalit ng fees gamit ang manwal na pag-type ng gusto mong halaga ng sat/byte. Habang ang isang box na may highlighted in red ay maaari kang mag lagay ng halagang fees na gusto mo ibayad na BTC or mBTC

---

7.

At tapos na, ngayo naman ay kailangan ninyong alamin kung magkano ang kailangan ninyong bayaran sa transaksiyon ninyo. Maaari ninyo malaman ito kung susunod kayo ang mga susunod na hakbang:

May ilang paraan para malaman ang kasalukuyang halaga ng transaction fee ang kailangan.
Ang isa sa mga paraan para tingnan ito ay sa Mempool Observer Topic at tingnan ang maaaring maging fee gamit ang FeeBuddy bot.

Ang isa pang magandang paraan para direktang makita ito ay tingnan ito sa Bitcoin Mempool. Ang Mempool ay hindi isang pool na kumukolekta ng mga memes, pero ay nagre-representa ng Bitcoin transaction na hinihintay na lang ma-confirm. Kaya ang isang buong Mempool ay nagkakahulugan na mahal ang pinadalang bayad para ma-proseso ang transaksiyon ng mabilis, dahil maraming transaksiyon ang nakahintay para ma kumpirma at makumpleto para masama ito sa susunod na block (ang mga mataas ang binayad para sa transaksiyon ay ang mga mapipili para mapasama sa susunod na block hanggat ito ay mapuno), habang ang ilan na halos wala pang laman na Mempool ay nag hihintay lang na makuha ang iyong transaksiyong makumpirma dahil sa mababang fee.

Ang isang magandang imahe ng Mempool ay makikita ninyo dito sa page ng Jochen Hoenicke: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,24h.

Mula sa website ay maaari kayong pumili pumili ng mga oras kung gaano ito katagal na maaari ninyong magamit para i-analisa ang Mempool. Mayroong 3 ibat ibang graph:
- Unconfirmed Transaction Count (Mempool)
- Mga Pending transaction fee sa BTC
- Mempool Size na MB

Para sa konsiderasyon, ang una at huling graph ay angkop, pero ang huling graph ang pinakaepektibo ay may gamit, kung titingnan mismo ang aktuwal na laki ng Mempool in MB. Dahil madalas mangyari ay mayroong malaking transaksiyon (in bytes) ang naghihintay sa Mempool, kung saan nakalista ito sa first graph bilang isang transaksiyon pero kailangan ng malaking laki (dahil mayroon itong maraming input), halimbawa mayroong maraming non-SegWit transactions).  
Pero pag katapos nito ay, katulad na ito ng mga ibang graph.

Unconfirmed Transaction Count (Mempool):

---

Mempool Size na MB:



Kung igagalaw ninyo ang inyong mouse patungo sa graph, maaari ninyo makita ang linya na nagre-representa kung gaano kadaling satoshi per byte (sat / byte). Ito ay nagbibigay sa inyo ng estimasyon kung magkano ang kailangang inyong bayaran para sa inyong transaksiyon. Kailangan nyo rin tingnan ang mga nakaraang itsura nito, gaano kalaki ang MB ng transaksiyon mula sa mga nakaraang oras at madalas bang walang laman ang Mempool. Kaya, mas maiging onting satoshi per byte. Siyempre, depende pa rin ito kung gaano mo mabilis gustong ipadala ang transaksiyon. Kung hindi naman ito agaran, mas maiging maghintay o di kaya ay gumamit ng mababang fee, mas makatotohanan sa mga susunod na oras.

Ang isa sa mga hindi tiyak na variable ay kung saan makikita ang susunod na block. Sa mga iilang kaso, ito ay tumatagal ng halos ilang oras sa pagitan ng dalawang magkasunod na block. Tapos, may maraming transaksiyon ang naiipon na kailangang ilagay sa susunod na block at kailangan ng maraming oras. Karagdagan pa dito, ito ay posibleng maraming transaksiyon ang pumasok sa Mempool bayagya at mayroong mas mataas na fee kaysa sa inyo, Ito ay masasama sa susunod na block kaysa ang sayo. Kaya, mayroon ding panganib ang pagpili ng mababang bayad sa transaksiyon.

Dagdag pa dito, kailangan ninyong tingnan lagi ang volume ng transaksiyon ng mga nakaraang araw. May ilang pangyayari, madalas ay may mga pattern:



- Pag katapos ng mga 08:00 CET, ang dami ng tranksiyon ay tumataas, mga bandang 23:00 ang mga Mempool ay walang madalas na laman (kaya ang mga oras na ito ay mahalaga, minsan maaga o di kaya naman ay mamaya)
- SA pagitan ng 02:00 at 08:00 CET ay ang magandang oras para mag padala ng Bitcoin, kung saan ang Mempool ay madalas walang laman
- Monday ang madalas na pinaka abalang oras
- Tuwing weekend ang Mempool ay madalas walang laman sa buong linggo, kahit na ito ay rush hour

Laging isipin ang mga pattern na ito ay nag papalit kahit anong oras, lalo na sa pag taas ng presyo ng BTC, maraming users ang gumagawa ng transaksiyon, kaya ang fees ay maaari ding tumaas.

---

At sa pang huli, isang maikling halimbawa

Ngayon ay 01:00 CET dito (gabi) noong ginawa ko ang screenshot, ang kung makikita ninyo ang Mempool sa larawan (daily overview):


Ito naman ay Monday, ang dami ng transaksiyon sa araw na ito ay sobrang taas tulad ng inaasahan. Pero ang Mempool ay madalas walang laman pa din. Maaari nating sabihin na dahil wala itong laman ng mga ilang oras pa ngayong gabi, tulad ng nakaraang linggo at mayroon pa tayong oras ngayong gabi.

Kung titingnan ninyo ang laki ng lahat ng transaksiyon sa Mempool pag ginalaw ninyo ang mouse ninyo sa graph, makikita ninyo sa huling block na hindi pa ito kumpleto (halos 0.55 MB (madalas mahigit 1 MB ang kasya sa isang block)). At sa ngayong punto, pipiliin ko ang 2 satoshi / byte at maaaring ito ay mataas dahil kasama na ito sa susunod na block.

At kung titingnan ninyo ang graph, maaari ninyong makita ang ilang transaksiyon na sobrang taas... Pinadala nila ang transaksiyon nila na mahigit 100 satoshi / byte, kahit na ang fee lamang ay 2 satoshi / byte na sapat lang para makuha sa susunod na block. ^^

Sa bawat transaction sa Bitcoin ay kailangan ng bayad. Ito ay importante dahil kailangang mababa ang patunay hangga't maaari para dumating ang transaksiyon sa papaldahan nila ng naaayon sa oras. Ang bilis ng transaksiyon ay depende sa kung magkano ang binayad dito. Ang fees ay tinatawag na Satoshi per byte (sat / byte). Mas mataas na bayad ng sat / byte, mas mabilis ang transaksiyon na maiilagay ito sa susunod na block. Ang mga miners ang pipili ng transaksiyon depende sa laki ng transaction fee (sat / byte). Ito ay lohikal, dahil ang mga miners ay hindi lang makakatanggap ng block reward kundi pati na rin ang transaction fee sa lahat ng transaksiyon ay kasama sa naminang block.

Hindi lahat ng wallet ay papayagan kang i-adjust ng transaction fee at sa mga maaari ay madalas nilang ginagawa ay ung simpleng default settings (o di kaya ay yung pinaka mahal). Ang isang magandang wallet ay papayagan kang ilagay ng transaction fee tulad ng Electrum.

Pagkatapos mong magpalit ng settings, isa sa pinakamahalaga ay malaman mo ang ideyal na halaga ng transaction fee, kung saan ito makikita sa maaasahan at tumpak na websites. Pero kailangan ay maaari mong palitan ang mga fees.

Para sa gabay na ito, ginagamit ko ito Electrum at ang Mempool by Jochen Hoenicke.
Ngayong malapit kana onting hakbang na lang para makatipid ka sa halaga ng Bitcoin:

1.

Una, buksan mo ang iyong Electrum. Ngayon, simulan natin maging madaling gamitin ang iyong wallet sa paggamit ng mga shortcut. Ngayon pindutin ang view sa may kaliwang itaas na bahagi at pindutin ang shortcut na gusto mong lumabas, tulad ng sa imahe sa ibaba.
Sa gabay na ito ay pinili ko lahat-lahat.

---

2.

Para sa mga older version ng Electrum, maaari ninyo edit ang fees manwal mula sa Electrum gamit ang tools and preferences sa menu, gayunpaman halos lahat ng bagong version ay hindi na kaya. Para lang mapalitan ninyo ang fees ay kailangan ninyong subukang gumawa ng transaksiyon. Ngayon ang kailangan nyo na lang gawin ay lagyan ang mga detalye tulad ng wallet address at kung magkano bago pindutin ang pay. At lalabas ang window na ito

---

3.

Ngayon makikita ninyo at maaari kayong mag-ayos ng fee gamit ang slider kung saan hindi sapat. Para ma-edit ang inyong mga fees ay pindutin lang ang icon na nakasaad sa ibabang imahe.

---

4.

Ngayon kung kayo ay tapos na sa step 3, ang maliit na window bar sa ibaba na may tsek ay maaaring pindutin sa setting at lalabas ang mga ito

---

5.

Ngayon, ang kailangan mong gawin ay piliin ang opsiyon na gusto mo sa iyong transaksiyon. Siguraduhing piliin mong mabuti ang Edit fees manually.

---

6.

Ngayon mapapansin ninyo na may dumagdag na slider at mayroon na tayong dalawang checkbox para magpalit ng fee tulad ng asa imahe sa ibaba. Gamit ang box na may highlighted na green sa ibaba, maaari kang magpalit ng fees gamit ang manwal na pag-type ng gusto mong halaga ng sat/byte. Habang ang isang box na may highlighted in red ay maaari kang mag lagay ng halagang fees na gusto mo ibayad na BTC or mBTC

---

7.

At tapos na, ngayo naman ay kailangan ninyong alamin kung magkano ang kailangan ninyong bayaran sa transaksiyon ninyo. Maaari ninyo malaman ito kung susunod kayo ang mga susunod na hakbang:

May ilang paraan para malaman ang kasalukuyang halaga ng transaction fee ang kailangan.
Ang isa sa mga paraan para tingnan ito ay sa Mempool Observer Topic at tingnan ang maaaring maging fee gamit ang FeeBuddy bot.

Ang isa pang magandang paraan para direktang makita ito ay tingnan ito sa Bitcoin Mempool. Ang Mempool ay hindi isang pool na kumukolekta ng mga memes, pero ay nagre-representa ng Bitcoin transaction na hinihintay na lang ma-confirm. Kaya ang isang buong Mempool ay nagkakahulugan na mahal ang pinadalang bayad para ma-proseso ang transaksiyon ng mabilis, dahil maraming transaksiyon ang nakahintay para ma kumpirma at makumpleto para masama ito sa susunod na block (ang mga mataas ang binayad para sa transaksiyon ay ang mga mapipili para mapasama sa susunod na block hanggat ito ay mapuno), habang ang ilan na halos wala pang laman na Mempool ay nag hihintay lang na makuha ang iyong transaksiyong makumpirma dahil sa mababang fee.

Ang isang magandang imahe ng Mempool ay makikita ninyo dito sa page ng Jochen Hoenicke: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,24h.

Mula sa website ay maaari kayong pumili pumili ng mga oras kung gaano ito katagal na maaari ninyong magamit para i-analisa ang Mempool. Mayroong 3 ibat ibang graph:
- Unconfirmed Transaction Count (Mempool)
- Mga Pending transaction fee sa BTC
- Mempool Size na naka MB

For our consideration, the first and the last graph are suitable, while the last graph is more effective for our purpose, as it shows the actual size of the Mempool in MB. Because sometimes it happens that very large transactions (in bytes) are waiting in the Mempool, which are listed in the first graph as a single transaction but need a lot of size (because they have many inputs, for example or are many non-SegWit transactions).  
But after all, the graphs are very similar:


Unconfirmed Transaction Count (Mempool):

---

Mempool Size in MB:





When you move your mouse across the graph, you can see which line represents how many satoshi per byte (sat / byte). This will allow you to estimate how much transaction fees you need to use for your transaction. You should also look back a bit in the past, how much MB of transactions was waiting the last few hours and whether the Mempool was generally emptied regularly. Then, it is reasonable to choose only a few satoshi per byte. Of course, it depends on how fast you have to send the transaction. If it is not necessary, it is advisable to wait or to send with a lower fee, which you think is realistic in the next few hours.

The big unknown variable is when the next block will be found. In rare cases, it may take more than an hour between two consecutive blocks. Then, many transactions accumulate which have to be included in the next blocks and until then a lot of time can pass. In addition, it is possible that many new transactions enter the Mempool in the meantime and if they have a higher fee than yours, they are included into a new block instead of your ones. So, there is also a risk of choosing a low transaction fee.


In addition, you should always check the transaction volume during past days. There are certain, frequently recurring patterns:




- After around 08:00 CET, the transaction volume tends to increase, around 23:00 the Mempool empties gradually (these times can vary, sometimes it’s starting earlier, sometimes later)
- Between 02:00 and 08:00 CET is the best time to send Bitcoin, when the Mempool is emptied regularly
- Monday is often the busiest time
- During the weekend the Mempool is usually much emptier than during the week, even at rush hour


Keep in mind that these patterns may change at any time, especially when BTC is increasing in price, many users doing transactions, so the fees will most likely also increase.

---

And finally, a short example:

Currently it was 01:00 CET here (night) when I made the screenshot, the Mempool is showing the following picture (daily overview):


It was Monday, so the transaction volume during the day was very high as expected. But currently, the Mempool is now almost empty again. It can be assumed that it will be empty several times tonight as in the previous week and it’s still the whole night left.

If you look at the size of all transactions in the Mempool by moving your mouse across the graph, you will see that the last block wasn’t completely full (approx. 0.55 MB (normally more than 1 MB fits into a block)). At this point, I would choose 2 satoshi / byte and the probability will be very high that this transaction gets already included in the next block.

And when you have a look at the graph you’ll also notice some transactions using a fee way too high… They had sent their transaction with more than 100 satoshi / byte, although a fee of only 2 satoshi / byte would have been enough to get the transaction into the next block. ^^

---

Yes, that makes more sense now.

However, the total amount I received is still around 0.15 BTC.

Basically, there were only two outgoing transactions.
Consolidation: https://mempool.space/pt/tx/f027ce9d1511c16e4c18d82184feba8d76bbd3037dbc9ef8d08f8423d7421542
Sale (to help cover server costs): https://mempool.space/pt/tx/1ea4904518fb4d726e99823b20ae898ab8ecf7b8a8352e79b460de4b60492954





I'm only looking at the BTC side.

The exchange rate naturally varies and should be based on the current rate, not the rate at the time I enter the market, which I think makes more sense.

Estava-se mesmo a ver, que ira acontecer.

Olhando para o panorama atual, eles tem 17% dos node da rede:
https://bitref.com/nodes/

Então, estamos perante um novo BCH. Parabens. Vamos ganhar umas moedas, para converter logo para BTC verdadeiro.

Maybe I do not sufficiently understand the issue, but it seems to me that one of the complaints that can relate to showing the dollar value is that the dollar value is shown at today's valuation, so then each time that bitcoin is received it has a different dollar valuation, so I am not sure if there might be an option to show the dollar value at the time that the bitcoin is received.  There are some wallets that show both the value at the time received and today's value.

To be honest, I just got to know today that the tool got a new design on the home page. I am not sure how long ago it was designed 
I have mostly been accessing loyce.club via the profiles link, which is still the same, so I had no idea that there was some bit of redesign. But I really liked it too, and it's a bit refreshing.

That's how the system was intended to work, but, in practice, I'm guessing that the vast majority of people would stick to the default list. That's just to have the view aligned with the rest of the forum members.
For most of the forum users who are not engaged in any exchange of goods or services, there's not much of a real value in building your own trust, unless I'm missing something here.

Maybe we could use a poll to see (roughly) what percent of people bothered to build their own trust list.

Thanks Bitmover, that's exactly the idea.

There is a problem... I didn't literally receive all of that amount, since I did a consolidation for myself. So, I'd say the amount is inflated by almost double. Which also doesn't make sense to present it this way.

I made you work, and now maybe it doesn't make as much sense to use it. Sorry. 

It's better to word it differently. Instead of saying that you need or don't need to know someone you add to your trust list, it's better to say that you should know the person. If you don't know me, you never talked to me, you have no idea how I feel, think, and act in certain situations, why would you trust me? Don't trust me because of my pretty name, the cute colors in my sig or avatar, the number of merits I have earned, or because I post a lot. None of that necessarily means that I can be trusted. It could mean that but it's not proof of trust.