A sony mesmo lançou um video durante o lançamento do ps4 ensinando a como compartilhar jogos, simplesmente passando o jogo de uma pessoa pra outra, já hoje eles jogam fora e achou que a internet deixar desapercebido: https://www.instagram.com/p/DaQ4Q30D2Q

Se eles pelo menos resolvessem abrir mão do monopólio da loja, deixar com que outros comerciantes também comercializem o jogo, ainda sim seria bastante criticado, abro o X e só vejo mais e mais indignações repudiando a decisão do fim das mídias físicas. Será que eles vão voltar atrás? Eles voltaram quando anunciaram que ia fechar a loja do PS3...

A sony vem fazendo muuita merda, tá merecendo uma concorrência mesmo, empresa mal acostumada é fogo..

Já não é, mas continua a existir e praticamente todos os jogos tem uma versão pirata a circular.

O que realmente acaba por minimizar a pirataria é o multiplayer e afins.

Além disso, devido ao mercado global, consegue-se jogos a preços bem acessíveis. Mas, se isso inverter, vai levar a aumentar novamente a pirataria.

Outro elemento, que faz com que a pirataria já não tenha o mesmo impacto, é porque as novas gerações não tem tantos conhecimentos de como chegar a ela, por incrível que pode parecer.

Há 20 anos atras, não havia quase ninguém que não sabia o que era um Kazaa para fazer download de musicas ou torrents para filmes e jogos.

Hoje falas em torrent, a malta nova não sabe o que é.

Por isso é que eu disse, que era uma forma de fugir a essas taxas. Eles não estarão a fazer nada de ilegal. Apenas aproveitam a forma como o sistema esta montado e funcionam, para obter a melhor vantagem durante o maior tempo que conseguirem.

Na Steam tem uma função chamada "modo família" ou algo assim.. você pode botar até 5 pessoas e compartilhar jogos como se fosse mídia física mesmo.. não funciona com todos os jogos, mas testei anos atrás e tinha vários jogos compatíveis.

Pode ler aqui: https://help.steampowered.com/pt-br/faqs/view/054C-3167-DD7F-49D4

Revender é impossível mesmo.. com certeza deve ter impacto nas "receitas evergreen".. mas hoje em dia com R$ 10 (US$ 2!) você consegue comprar vários jogos AAA mais antigos em promoções.


Nesse quesito a GOG é a melhor mesmo..

Mas a Steam não fica muito atrás.. vou dar um exemplo, tenho o Project Cars 2.. ele não está mais na loja Steam por questões de licenças da desenvolvedora, mas continuo podendo baixar e jogar a qualquer momento.

O problema mesmo é o modelo desses jogos mais novos, multiplayers que dependem de uma grande infraestrutura de servidores.

yeah.. i'll figure it out. sorry about the bullshit.

The most useful thing in this thread is the observation a few of you landed on independently (BitBrainers, mu_enrico, Fortify): every model spits out the same "5%, DCA, cautious" answer, and it jumps around the moment you correct the price. That isn't reasoning about Bitcoin. It's the answer a compliance-trained advisor is built to give a human retail investor. Which makes sense, because that's exactly what you're asking it to role-play.

But I think that framing is the whole problem, not the AI's. "Would an advanced agent invest in Bitcoin" quietly assumes the agent is a human-style investor picking an allocation. A real autonomous agent isn't a retail investor. It's an economic actor that has to transact, with other agents, at machine speed, against counterparties it will never meet and cannot vet.

bitmover got closest to the actual reason an agent would touch Bitcoin: it's the one asset an agent can custody itself, keys in memory, no broker, no bank account, no human to sign for it. You can't hand an agent a Schwab login or a bar of gold. You can hand it a private key.

Once you see the agent as a transactor rather than an investor, two functional needs show up, neither about price:

1. Settlement no single party can freeze or reverse. Most agent payments today ride USDC on Base or Solana, and that's fine for the payment leg, stable and fast. But a stablecoin has an issuer with a freeze function, and an issuer that can freeze can be leaned on. When value moves between two agents who don't trust each other, "no operator can claw this back" stops being ideology and becomes a hard requirement. Bitcoin is the one ledger that clears that bar after finality.

2. Proof of what happened. When two agents disagree about whether the work was actually delivered, someone needs a neutral record neither of them controls. Anchor a hash of the record to Bitcoin and you get "this existed at this time and hasn't been altered," checkable by anyone, no trusted middleman. That's a verification function, not an investment one, and it's the part nobody in the payment race has solved.

So to the OP's question directly: no, I don't think an advanced agent "invests" in Bitcoin the way these prompts are testing for, and the boring 5% answer is the model correctly refusing to pretend otherwise. What an advanced agent would do is depend on Bitcoin, as the settlement it can't have reversed and the record it can prove later, in a machine economy where it can't trust the counterparty and can't call a human to sort it out.

And to Lucius's point about AI eventually building its own system: the twist is an agent doesn't want a money it controls. It wants a money nobody controls, including its own owner. That's a much shorter list.

Achas mesmo isso?
Existe muita forma de sonegar imposto. Essas grandes empresas tem gabinetes especializados, em procurar brechas nos sistemas, para procurar pagar menos impostos possíveis, mas isso não significa que essas brechas tornem o processo 100% legal.

Olha a Apple:

Houve ainda um caso com Amazon, mas por falta de provas consistentes, acabou por cair.

Enfim, claro que esse não é o foco dessas empresas, mas se virem uma oportunidade vão aproveitar. Certamente, tentam evitar que as coisas possam fugir de controlo e acabar ter problemas, como foi o caso da Apple.

Bem que, a UE não é um grande exemplo, porque andam sempre atras dessas empresas americanas a tentar fazer com que eles paguem mais impostos.

Agora imagina, se poderem cambiar Euros para Dólares, com taxas cambiais mais reduzidas ou nulas, será que não vão aproveitar?

O foco pode não ser esse, mas se funcionar, irão aproveitar.

I don't actually have it because I didn't save it. But, as @Zwei showed, the rate info appears all together, as if it were the normal network rate.

But since I still have the wallet data, I can test it again with more details. As soon as I have some time, I'll show you how Bitcoin transactions work on a Windows PC.

with the help of claud AI, i think i found the code for the fee (i could be wrong tho, if someone can double check this that would be great).
it looks like it's calculated based on the amount being sent, subject to the minimum and maximum amounts in USD.

Quote from: https://github.com/CoinSpace/cs-common/blob/master/lib/CsWallet.js

Quote from: https://github.com/CoinSpace/cs-common/blob/master/lib/fee.js

but what's more interesting is that the fee % seems to be server-configurable and is not hard coded into the wallet code.
so the fee could be 0.5% today, then changed to 10% tomorrow if OP wanted to.

Quote from: https://github.com/CoinSpace/cs-common/blob/master/lib/CsWallet.js

so it is designed to be a hidden fee in the user interface, hmmm... i don't like that. even though this is open source and the fee is right there in the code, this is super deceptive.
tbh, i don't see why anyone aware of all this would use this wallet when there are better, completely free open-source alternatives with no hidden fees.

thank you for taking the time to look into it 

nope, it doesn't even show the fee you are going to be paying, only the amount sent, i tested this with 0.025 LTC input, and here are the screenshots:



the TX id: https://blockchair.com/litecoin/transaction/c1e664ee98f451a3a7b8190132164eee1f63cd7cce339b3efd5570bb3b6d0bce
litecoin transactions are super cheap. the network fee for this was only $0.00006, but with the service fees it was a $0.14 extra, and they just added their own address without even showing it or letting the user know.

you genuinely have to be so clueless to use this as your wallet.

In my country, both VPNs and TOR are actively blocked. However, I refrain from using TOR. I do use a VPN. 🙋

I'm a big fan of Chesterton. His hero advised always hiding a dry leaf in an autumn forest. In my country, 50 percent of the population uses VPNs, while very few use TOR. ISPs are usually well aware that users are using TOR, and this can create problems even for a conscientious user. Yes, I know about the possibility of using a VPN-TOR combination... However, even in this case, it's impossible to completely eliminate the possibility of a broken secure internet connection, in which case the ISP will still detect your use of TOR.

Regarding the affiliate program, I also have questions about maintaining anonymity and privacy (analytics programs like Chainalysis monitor 24/7).

I understand the general frustration, but pragmatically speaking, it doesn’t really apply here.
Fruit grows for free on free land too, yet no one questions why we still pay for it.

The only real question is how clearly this fee was explained and shown to the user before the operation — or whether it was bundled into one combined number that included all fees together.
In any case, it’s their right to set that fee, and it’s your right not to use their product

I have not considered viewing the price of bitcoin on my arm to have had been any major problem or even threat to my privacy in recent times.

Perhaps I am not paranoid enough?


Yeah.. it is like tradition dude.

Don't u no nuttin?  You're just a great big Tim Horton's donut-eating hosehead, eh. Take off!


Yes.. I know some folks who seem to overdo it on the alcohol.. and then it ends up being a kind of self-medication, and they feel better...even though the alcohol may well be pickling certain parts of their body.. especially their brain... but yeah, I might be overly judgemental from time to time.


I think it is called grifting.

I doubt that normal "bitcoiners" and/or even crypto people did close to as well as that guy.

I agree, if one have already built the habit of purchasing constantly, moments like this are more about staying disciplined than chasing excitement long term conviction usually beats trying to time every move, this is why having a plan matters whether pricy goes lower or not sticking to a consistent strategy is a lot less stressful than trying to guess the right entry. The market always gives individuals reasons to panic or get overexcited consistency is probably the most underrated strategies, being close to the 200WWA is definitely interested , but history also shows there's no guarantee we have seen the bottom have a good strategy and following it is what really matters.

I definitely agree with you because I don't see any excitement too if someone is persistently and also consistently inacculating Bitcoin, it will just be as normal as even though the prices high but at this Junction he will accumulate based on the amount is set to be buying consistently, and we know that when the price is low definitely he will accumulate more Bitcoin than when the price is high and with that there's nothing to worry about because already he has been taken advantage of it for a very long time and before you know you will see more bitcoin in his wallet.

Yes also there's still possibility of price to even go down just as you said and if already you have exhausted everything you have but ignoring your consistently method how can you take the advantage of this, the most important thing is that be Persistent and be consistent and everything will revolve around you no matter how the price is, you will always be count in.

I agree that it is less wordy.  Do you have the old language to compare it side by side?   

Get the fuck out of here.

If guys are already buying bitcoin regularly, then there is no need for them to get excited now, and they can stick with whatever system and practice that they already have in place that may well involve buying bitcoin regularly, persistently and consistently.

Of course, currently the BTC price is about 3% below the 200-WMA, so historically anywhere between 25% above the 200-WMA and even at the 200-WMA and even prices below the 200-WMA do not tend to happen very frequently, yet there are still possibilities that the BTC price could go even lower or even stay in this price territory for exended periods of time.

Congrats winners

Rank	Username	EARNBET	Prediction (USD)	Difference
1	atomicluv (contesthunters)		$58,500.00	$49.86
2	Protonvive	protonContesthunters.com	$58,496.54	$53.32
3	Cumper	Cumper261Contesthunters.com	$58,444.55	$105.31
4	WhattheFk	whattheContesthunters.com	$58,664.65	$114.79
5	CONVOAI	CONVOAIContesthunters.com	$58,750.60	$200.74
6	Eardwot	EardwotContesthunters.com	$58,289.44	$260.42
7	Tosign	TosignContesthunters.com	$58,818.33	$268.47
8	Ninja Primes	ninjaContesthunters.com	$58,888.88	$339.02
9	adefunmi	adefunmi89Contesthunters.com	$58,208.15	$341.71
10	Bogimen	bogimenContesthunters.com	$59,058.87	$509.01
11	wallwallbtc	wallwallbtcContesthunters.com	$59,063.63	$513.77
12	Lamine Yamal (contesthunters)		$59,120.00	$570.14
13	Fixed Points (contesthunters)		$59,160.00	$610.14
14	GDBYG	GDBYGContesthunters.com	$59,179.45	$629.59
15	Kuconas	KuconasContesthunters.com	$59,199.61	$649.75
16	shakshii	shakshiiContesthunters.com	$59,232.33	$682.47
17	babyshoes (contesthunters)		$59,263.00	$713.14
18	Pmalek	PmalekContesthunters.com	$59,298.36	$748.50
19	Drtlod	Drtlod678Contesthunters.com	$57,638.11	$911.75
20	Huntblt	huntbltContesthunters.com	$59,464.43	$914.57
21	Natanbgak	NatanbgakContesthunters.com	$59,495.11	$945.25
22	dzonikg28	DzonikgContesthunters.com	$59,509.48	$959.62
23	cryptobest4all	cryptobest4Contesthunters.com	$59,511.58	$961.72
24	Petdtkn	PetdtknContesthunters.com	$59,512.77	$962.91
25	Vaigine	VaigineContesthunters.com	$59,638.33	$1,088.47
26	DokuAd	DokuAdContesthunters.com	$59,685.56	$1,135.70
27	neasha	neashaContesthunters.com	$59,696.66	$1,146.80
28	MGVVY55	MGVVY55Contesthunters.com	$57,379.12	$1,170.74
29	Improved	CamachoContesthunters.com	$57,378.34	$1,171.52
30	Qjmak333	Qjmak333Contesthunters.com	$59,820.44	$1,270.58
31	Woodie	WoodieContesthunters.com	$59,880.00	$1,330.14
32	FRkgWoo	frkgwooContesthunters.com	$59,899.54	$1,349.68
33	LokhcfyBit	LokhcfyBitContestHunter	$59,966.48	$1,416.62
34	Dip69	Dip69BBBContesthunters.com	$57,119.01	$1,430.85
35	vandomm	vandomContesthunters.com	$59,986.55	$1,436.69
36	weybeans	weybeansContesthunters.com	$60,001.15	$1,451.29
37	Debbiecrypto	DebbiecryptoContesthunters.com	$60,009.78	$1,459.92
38	xGennady	Gennady12Contesthunters.com	$60,027.50	$1,477.64
39	MCVXYZ	mcvxyzContesthunters.com	$60,101.11	$1,551.25
40	Xbajwk	xbajwkContesthunters.com	$60,102.23	$1,552.37
41	StarFish (contesthunters)		$60,212.78	$1,662.92
42	Soqunami	SoqunamiContesthunters.com	$60,222.33	$1,672.47
43	Warkop	WarkopContesthunters.com	$60,223.78	$1,673.92
44	tvplus006	tvplus006Contesthunters.com	$60,233.44	$1,683.58
45	Taricoins	Taricoin62	$60,234.00	$1,684.14
46	Promocodeudo	Faceoffx	$60,245.35	$1,695.49
47	Wqjdd	WqjddContesthunters.com	$60,276.35	$1,726.49
48	Xnacarvibe	XnacarvibeContesthunters.com	$60,320.15	$1,770.29
49	Rohang (contesthunters)		$60,333.33	$1,783.47
50	Futurexxx	Futurexxx	$60,400.65	$1,850.79
51	G00LA	g00laContesthunters.com	$60,439.54	$1,889.68
52	xandry	xandryContesthunters.com	$60,469.48	$1,919.62
53	Xbaus	XbausContesthunters.com	$60,508.34	$1,958.48
54	mv1986	mv1986Contesthunters.com	$60,513.52	$1,963.66
55	rentxa	rentxaContesthunters.com	$60,518.55	$1,968.69
56	Ksmertz	KsmertzContesthunters.com	$60,550.06	$2,000.20
57	IQ.cash	IQ123Contesthunters.com	$60,555.55	$2,005.69
58	Yoona_As	Yoona_AsContesthunters.com	$60,589.22	$2,039.36
59	riyadmozu19 (contesthunters)		$60,599.60	$2,049.74
60	Yconz	yconzContesthunters.com	$60,624.54	$2,074.68
61	BTCbom	BTCbomContesthunters.com	$60,655.66	$2,105.80
62	Palah245 (contesthunters)		$60,690.35	$2,140.49
63	logitechmouse (contesthunters)		$60,696.69	$2,146.83
64	NuckaBTC	NuckaBTCContesthunters.com	$60,700.66	$2,150.80
65	Uvarlost	UvarlostContesthunters.com	$60,728.55	$2,178.69
66	mini (contesthunters)		$60,750.00	$2,200.14
67	LNC999	LNC999Contesthunters.com	$60,777.22	$2,227.36
68	Jiopen	jiopenContesthunters.com	$60,798.45	$2,248.59
69	vikkynice	vikkyniceContesthunters.com	$60,811.11	$2,261.25
70	Tanelhole	tanelContesthunters.com	$60,914.31	$2,364.45
71	Smartprofit	Smart135tContesthunters.com	$60,923.34	$2,373.48
72	Xifi	XifiContesthunters.com	$61,146.45	$2,596.59
73	Fulllove1	Fulllove1Contesthunters.com	$61,200.12	$2,650.26
74	Toffprints	ToffprintsContesthunter.com	$61,208.04	$2,658.18
75	eaLiTy	eaLiTyContesthunters.com	$61,250.00	$2,700.14
76	Odenleva09	Odenleva09ContestHunter	$61,265.11	$2,715.25
77	Wolimmon	WolimmonContesthunters.com	$61,300.22	$2,750.36
78	HausaBitCkk	HausaBitCkkContesthunters.com	$61,303.88	$2,754.02
79	Hello5	hellokContesthunters.com	$61,320.54	$2,770.68
80	Alzarifais (contesthunters)		$61,550.76	$3,000.90
81	ASK Day	anksContesthunters.com	$61,552.65	$3,002.79
82	Zrxefd	ZrxefdContesthunters.com	$61,655.76	$3,105.90
83	RTX-G53	RTX-G53Contesthunters.com	$61,722.32	$3,172.46
84	inearth	inearthContesthunters.com	$61,834.54	$3,284.68
85	Ricardo11	ricardo11Contesthunters.com	$62,002.54	$3,452.68
86	julerz12		$62,123.23	$3,573.37
87	bitmover (contesthunters)		$62,186.00	$3,636.14
88	Takiya24 (contesthunters)		$62,227.34	$3,677.48
89	LastKiss (contesthunters)		$62,286.00	$3,736.14
90	rbynxx	rbynxxContesthunters.com	$62,345.00	$3,795.14
91	IIrik11	llrik11Contesthunters.com	$54,656.21	$3,893.65
92	Tswargz13 (contesthunters)		$62,497.00	$3,947.14
93	StrongK (contesthunters)		$62,500.00	$3,950.14
94	Ventazz	Vep99TContesthunters.com	$62,733.55	$4,183.69
95	BitcoinHunt3r (contesthunters)		$63,061.45	$4,511.59
96	Teethow	OddoeufContesthunters.com	$63,333.33	$4,783.47
97	F150 (contesthunters)		$64,468.00	$5,918.14
98	KeenanEL19 (contesthunters)		$64,532.00	$5,982.14
99	MamBp9	MamunBp	$6,000,190.00	$5,941,640.14

Actual BTC Price: $58,549.86

Congrats winners

Rank	Username	Prediction (USD)	Difference
1	DarkState	$58,530.87	$18.99
2	MicroScript	$58,510.58	$39.28
3	Protonvive	$58,608.20	$58.34
4	Natanbgak	$58,487.71	$62.15
5	G00LA	$58,639.01	$89.15
6	LokhcfyBit	$58,689.11	$139.25
7	Eardwot	$58,746.56	$196.70
8	WhattheFk	$58,776.76	$226.90
9	adefunmi	$58,811.31	$261.45
10	MGVVY55	$58,279.55	$270.31
11	Ninja Primes	$58,944.04	$394.18
12	Cumper	$58,945.56	$395.70
13	IIrik11	$58,975.01	$425.15
14	wallwallbtc	$58,999.99	$450.13
15	DEF2026 (contesthunters)	$58,000.00	$549.86
16	Bogimen	$59,116.87	$567.01
17	Warkop	$59,150.01	$600.15
18	GDBYG	$57,919.44	$630.42
19	Tosign	$59,198.28	$648.42
20	Pmalek	$59,236.51	$686.65
21	Petdtkn	$57,856.67	$693.19
22	Improved	$57,855.12	$694.74
23	shakshii	$59,290.33	$740.47
24	tvplus006	$59,322.44	$772.58
25	Huntblt	$59,348.54	$798.68
26	Yoona_As	$57,723.52	$826.34
27	BitMaxz	$59,400.10	$850.24
28	NuckaBTC	$59,440.24	$890.38
29	Zrxefd	$59,477.11	$927.25
30	dzonikg28	$59,498.02	$948.16
31	cryptobest4all	$59,501.05	$951.19
32	Vaigine	$59,522.55	$972.69
33	Cointikka	$59,563.00	$1,013.14
34	LNC999	$59,601.44	$1,051.58
35	HIJ2026 (contesthunters)	$59,625.40	$1,075.54
36	Odenleva09	$59,658.33	$1,108.47
37	BTCbom	$59,736.27	$1,186.41
38	neasha	$59,812.55	$1,262.69
39	Drtlod	$59,850.59	$1,300.73
40	vandomm	$59,870.55	$1,320.69
41	Dip69	$57,199.99	$1,349.87
42	Kuconas	$59,930.56	$1,380.70
43	DokuAd	$59,955.55	$1,405.69
44	IQ.cash	$59,999.99	$1,450.13
45	vikkynice	$60,002.22	$1,452.36
46	xGennady	$60,027.55	$1,477.69
47	Xbajwk	$60,044.23	$1,494.37
48	Antdm	$60,086.78	$1,536.92
49	DYING_S0UL	$60,183.00	$1,633.14
50	weybeans	$60,209.99	$1,660.13
51	Wqjdd	$60,218.44	$1,668.58
52	Promocodeudo	$60,245.25	$1,695.39
53	xandry	$60,251.47	$1,701.61
54	Lamine Yamal (contesthunters)	$60,255.00	$1,705.14
55	FRkgWoo	$60,259.46	$1,709.60
56	Wolimmon	$60,312.57	$1,762.71
57	Xbaus	$60,392.55	$1,842.69
58	mv1986	$60,489.23	$1,939.37
59	bitzizzix	$60,525.11	$1,975.25
60	Fixed Points (contesthunters)	$60,542.00	$1,992.14
61	Xnacarvibe	$60,598.44	$2,048.58
62	khaled0111	$60,654.30	$2,104.44
63	Soqunami	$60,660.34	$2,110.48
64	klarki	$60,666.66	$2,116.80
65	Yconz	$60,682.33	$2,132.47
66	Ksmertz	$60,690.08	$2,140.22
67	rentxa	$60,738.11	$2,188.25
68	Jiopen	$60,740.33	$2,190.47
69	Rohang (contesthunters)	$60,777.77	$2,227.91
70	Debbiecrypto	$60,802.78	$2,252.92
71	Tanelhole	$60,972.44	$2,422.58
72	ABC2026 (contesthunters)	$61,000.00	$2,450.14
73	MCVXYZ	$61,037.17	$2,487.31
74	Futurexxx	$61,106.65	$2,556.79
75	Smartprofit	$61,175.09	$2,625.23
76	Xifi	$61,204.44	$2,654.58
77	bakasabo (contesthunters)	$61,247.13	$2,697.27
78	StarFish (contesthunters)	$61,251.78	$2,701.92
79	Hello5	$61,262.33	$2,712.47
80	ASK Day	$61,436.64	$2,886.78
81	Toffprints	$61,509.08	$2,959.22
82	RTX-G53	$61,609.54	$3,059.68
83	HausaBitCkk	$61,644.77	$3,094.91
84	Fulllove1	$61,721.55	$3,171.69
85	StrongK (contesthunters)	$61,750.00	$3,200.14
86	inearth	$61,778.54	$3,228.68
87	Ricardo11	$61,946.00	$3,396.14
88	logitechmouse (contesthunters)	$61,969.69	$3,419.83
89	Taricoins	$61,982.00	$3,432.14
90	mini (contesthunters)	$62,111.00	$3,561.14
91	rbynxx	$62,345.00	$3,795.14
92	babyshoes (contesthunters)	$62,367.00	$3,817.14
93	CONVOAI	$62,400.40	$3,850.54
94	Uvarlost	$62,680.55	$4,130.69
95	LastKiss (contesthunters)	$62,870.00	$4,320.14
96	atomicluv (contesthunters)	$63,400.00	$4,850.14
97	Ventazz	$63,500.11	$4,950.25
98	julerz12	$64,123.23	$5,573.37
99	Tswargz13 (contesthunters)	$64,381.00	$5,831.14
100	KeenanEL19 (contesthunters)	$64,432.00	$5,882.14
101	F150 (contesthunters)	$64,468.00	$5,918.14
102	bitmover	$64,517.44	$5,967.58
103	Dareo	$67,764.56	$9,214.70
104	Takiya24 (contesthunters)	$622,222.77	$563,672.91
105	bitbollo01 (contesthunters)	$5,676,008.00	$5,617,458.14
106	MamBp9	$5,986,096.00	$5,927,546.14

Actual BTC Price: $58,549.86

TOP D+!

É bacana demais ver essas alfinetadas "do bem" rolando, assim como acontece com Coca/Pepsi ou Burguer/Mc


E eu falei de uns 50% no post anterior pra Tether, to bem por fora.... a dominância deles realmente já se perdeu.
Ainda acho que eles devem manter uma porcentagem relevante de marketcap, mas de fato essa Open vai engolir muito mercado se essas empresas fizerem um serviço caprichado na integração com seus ambientes... é uma rede enorme de pagamentos já existente.

O CEO da Tether aproveitou para provocar a Circle:

You didn't  mention the tool  .
What should we comment now??
Have you checked this one out https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy ?

i don't think i have ever see a crypto wallet that charges 0.5% service fee for sending bitcoin transaction, and 0.5% service fee is fucking crazy.

and how exactly is it paid to you? do the wallet just add another address + the service fee when someone makes a transaction? that sounds like malware to me.
also, nowhere in the fee page that you say you charge a service fee, all you have is "transaction fee", bit misleading don't you think?

https://coin.space/all-about-fees/

yeah, every other free wallet is either completely free, or they make their money through adding a swap feature where they get commission from every exchange.

@examplens
Fair point on Chipmixer — that case is exactly why "trust us, we don't log" isn't enough as a promise. 7 TB "on a service that saved nothing" tells you everything about the gap between what services claim and what actually happens. The takedown showed that promises about data are only meaningful when the architecture makes it technically hard to save data in the first place.
That's the direction we push. Not "we promise we don't log" — but designing so that most of what could be logged simply isn't ever collected. Order data has a limited lifetime tied to the operational window; there's no user account layer accumulating history; no session tracking; no IP retention beyond what's needed to route the response.
We can't prove this from the outside — you're right about that. What we can do is stay consistent and let time do the verifying.
@bitmover
"The only way to protect your data is to never share it" — this is the actual answer, no matter how good the service. VPN/Tor + fresh addresses + minimum footprint at every step. A privacy-focused service does the last mile; the first 99% is on the user. We say the same to our own users, and it's the reason we push the Tor mirror as a first option, not an afterthought.
@MarryWithBTC
The Chipmixer / FBI question is a fair one — with law enforcement seizures, we only ever see the narrative the agency releases. Whether the 7 TB was operational data, honeypot traps, or evidence packaged for court — we don't know. What matters for the rest of us is the lesson: if a service can technically save it, sooner or later something gets saved.
About affiliate — you nailed the honest version. If someone's personal threat model is "no data about me anywhere, ever" — an affiliate program isn't the fit, and shouldn't be. Our affiliate system is for people running promotion who accept trackable identifiers as part of doing partner work. Users doing swaps stay in the no-account lane. Two different threat models, two different systems.
@aoluain
Exactly right — the two-pronged approach. Service side controls what's collected on their end; user side controls what leaves theirs. Neither can substitute for the other. And you're spot on that "No KYC / No AML / No registration" isn't just a slogan — it's actually a technical commitment about what a service refuses to collect in the first place.
Access via Tor plus VPN plus fresh addresses is the standard we'd recommend to any privacy-focused user, whether they use us or anyone else.
Thanks all — this is the kind of thread that makes the whole community smarter.

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan Juli 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 106 user (bertambah 3 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist n0nce YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon jeremypwr gbianchi EFS stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki buwaytress crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder SirJohnVonSlotty

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana Husna QA YOSHIE roycilik

Sumber: DT update log Juli 2026

This month 106 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

It's important to check AML score of Bitcoin these days, but when it comes to paying domain registrar or server costs then I think it's better to use stable coins as you won't have any issue with stable coins. I personally pay for domain names using stable coins like USDT and USDC and I've never faced any issues. Although, one can use Bitcoin to pay for those but again I think it's better to use stable coins sometimes.

Ou seja, seguindo os passos de Musk! Quanto mais treta melhor, custe o que custar, e se não deixarem mais brigar, vão comprar o Twitter também pra falarem o que quiser

Mas, defendo o @criptoevangelista, por mais que seja apenas uma brincadeira, não acho também que iriam rasgar dinheiro por nada, se não for ao menos por mais engajamento, então os dois são loucos!

E sabem oque isso me lembrou agora? De quando a gente tinha os sorteios da nossa aba quando a galera comprava os tickets, a ideia morreu por falta de engajamento, mas quem sabe se tiver gente a fim não dá pra ressuscitar? Não precisa ser necessariamente ligados à eventos cripto, dava pra começar até com uma previsão para resultados (seleções, placar, quem marca, etc) para a final da copa do mundo, 10 pila cada palpite....

Honestly, it is kind of impressive how the administration and the team of graphic design of this casino has managed to give off such a nostalgic and chill vibe with this service. That kind of pictures throw me back straight up to the 90s and 2000s.
It is something I had never seen before during this era when most casinos show a tendency to look quite similar one another.

The fact they have also continuing to give support to new games and experiences within Lotto says a lot about all the commitment which is being put on this casino in the long term.

I remember when they first came to this forum and they were rather just the typical new casino with a different skin on it. Time truly flies and we don't even realize it.

It is also essential to know or at least seek out services which state


So if anything is going to be collected its an IP address.

You read my mind   
I was playing something similar long time ago but I dont remember the name of the game, and I also played NBA game in the same style.
This retro sports game have something special and i think it would fit good on l0tt0 website with some modifications.

Thanks for the feedback - for the bigger players we need direct relationships to get the most up to date rates - but we are working on it! Stay tuned. Coinbase is in partnership with morpho so i think its fair to say the morpho rates in the defi section may be somewhat similar.

These are great - keep them coming!

https://borrowonbitcoin.com

e la vamos nós kkk

bem, essa brincadeira é de gente grande, talvez pra gerar tambem engajamento, reconhecimento, talvez abra ate novas porta de novos negocios sei la... acho que não apostariam por apostar, deve ter algo por tras disso q traz algum tipo de retorno financeiro para ambos.

O mesmo vale pro meu cartão etherfi, 3% de cashback, spread imperceptível, saldo em dólar ou euro, gastável em qualquer lugar do mundo que aceite cartão de crédito, mas tem KYC. Porém eu já desisti dessa ideia de cartão sem kyc, isso não existe de forma viável, e se tem, no máximo só serve pra ser usado pra que está nos EUA ou Europa.

aaa, manjei, porem aquilo ne, você mesmo disse que ele ficou exausto, então acredito que não aguentaria muito essa pegada

Lol! Over 4k posts in a month is actually astonishing 

I think it's due to conversational style because most of us are comfortable using pidgin to communicate. The local board is like a home for us and we treat it as a local hub to share experience.

Most posts are short and not all deep technical analysis. Most threads are relatable and our people find it easy to understand and contribute. 

Realmente apareceram vários vídeos pra mim, um deles foi de um pai que conseguiu escapar com o celula4r avisando 10 segundos antes e salvou a filha, mas imagina o desespero de descer as escadas com criança no colo e falar que vai ficar tudo bem, e ao mesmo tempo vê sua casa desabando...

Situação lamentável, só desejo que melhorem 

O "cara do Mises" é só o criador do primeiro ETF de Bitcoin do Brasil.. 100 mil deve ser troco para ele também os dois devem até ser amigos na vida real.

Tem até uma história que ele acertou o fundo de 2022, se não me engano.. deve ter entrado pesado e lucrou bastante nos últimos anos.


Estava lendo os comentários ali do admin da página.. parece que ele vai inventar alguma outra coisa para dar sequência ao projeto.. logo aparece mais dois caras interessados em apostar.. o próprio Mayall já ofereceu um "dobro ou nada"

Pois é, isso que eu ia postar também, o cara tem muita, mas muita grana, deve ser na casa de bilhões de patrimonio, portanto 100.000 reais deve ser troco de bala pra um cara desses, e também aquilo né.. ninguém aposta o que não tem, geralmente apostas são algo que se a pessoa perde não faz a menor diferença...

ele é bitcoiner das antigas também se não me engano, então deve ter milhares de moedinhas por ai

As promised to emf ellow local board member few hours ago, here is the brief overview of local boards for May 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview nevertheless.

---

Post activity per local board during May 2026

During May, 13781 posts were made across local boards which is an increase compared to April's numbers (13283). This increase has been spread among the most active boards, and one that had biggest increase was Nigerian that is again back at over 4k posts. Summer is coming, so let's see how situation develops and whether that affects activity.

---

Active members per local board during May 2026

1322 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards during May, that makes an increase compared to month before, during which 1276 members were active. Nigerian board remained at the top, and thanks mainly to them we have this increase. Unfortunately, French continues its descent towards the bottom.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during May 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leader is Polish with 70%, while at the same time Pakistan is at the bottom with 17% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Greek board with 60% (probably because they have no one who wrote 10+ posts), while Polish has only 20%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian local board is the leader with 52%, while before mentioned Greek is at the bottom of this bracket as they didn't have s single member who wrote 10+ posts during May in their local board.

---

Merit shared per local board during May 2026

During May, 6655 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, and is a big drop compared to April's 7452. Majority of this drop happened on German board (1146-489), which is somewhat known for big fluctuations in merit distribution so its probably not s cause for concern.

It is also good to see French board back on this chart, even if with only 2 merits sent.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during May 2026

In May, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, which is an decrease compared to April's 0.56. Still a very good merit per post ratio I would say.

Romanian board is back at the top with a very high 1.75 merit per post, Italian is 2nd with also very high 1.37 ratio, while last month's top board, Spanish, is at the 3rd spot while having 1.08 merit per post ratio. At the bottom is once again Greek board, and French is right next to them with not much better ratio.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during May 2026

536 member sent while 586 members received merit in one of the local boards, which is not that big differnece compared to April (530 senders, 601 receiver) when you take into consideration the drop in the number of merit shared. Needless to say Nigerian is once again at the top, leaving every other board far behind.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during May 2026

No surprise here-Romanian board is once again at the top, this time while having 72% of posts merited, but Italian is also not too far behind with 54%, especially when you consider how much more active Italian board is.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during May 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habit of local boards.

---

The most active members per local board during May 2026 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. Numeral (137) and jokers10 (1310 from Russian local board were the two most active memebrs in local board, while last month's top poster joker_josue has (125) to satisfy with the 3rd spot

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Numeral [137]	|	1. MaxMueller [84]	|	1. mandown [121]	|	1. fillippone [40]	|	1. joker_josue [125]	|	1. Porfirii [54]	|
2. jokers10 [131]	|	2. Soonandwaite [60]	|	2. yenerbatmaz [73]	|	2. Ale88 [38]	|	2. sabotag3x [67]	|	2. famososMuertos [35]	|
3. klarki [117]	|	3. MinoRaiola [52]	|	3. RaltcoinsB [69]	|	3. babo [33]	|	3. TryNinja [57]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [19]	|
4. safar1980 [115]	|	4. mole0815 [52]	|	4. Phoenix Anka [61]	|	4. Plutosky [30]	|	4. alegotardo [48]	|	4. Hispo [17]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [112]	|	5. cygan [47]	|	5. kriminall [58]	|	5. Italian Panic [27]	|	5. bitmover [44]	|	5. Filicius [14]	|
6. zasad@ [95]	|	6. Lakai01 [47]	|	6. Hvdv [57]	|	6. Cassius55 [22]	|	6. Forsyth Jones [40]	|	6. darxiaomi [14]	|
7. Alex077 [93]	|	7. Unknown01 [41]	|	7. Balmain [55]	|	7. Paolo.Demidov [15]	|	7. criptoevangelista [39]	|	7. danadc [13]	|
8. internetional [86]	|	8. Koal-84 [37]	|	8. Mustang Shelby [55]	|	8. alexrossi [13]	|	8. mikel_012 [31]	|	8. Allo-obmen [13]	|
9. tvplus006 [86]	|	9. Real-Duke [35]	|	9. Silence Scream [51]	|	9. *Ace* [12]	|	9. Paredao [29]	|	9. darbitmobilerecovery [11]	|
10. xandry [73]	|	10. mv1986 [31]	|	10. Xyloo [51]	|	10. bitcoiner180 [11]	|	10. rdluffy [25]	|	10. Marmeladka.cc [11]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [95]	|	1. winspiral [10]	|	1. Peanutswar [43]	|	1. Daniel91 [44]	|	1. Floxynice [100]	|	1. khaled0111 [36]	|
2. Luzin [45]	|	2. TryNinja [5]	|	2. cryptoaddictchie [36]	|	2. ovcijisir [42]	|	2. Lenubari [58]	|	2. Kavelj22 [27]	|
3. AakZaki [35]	|	3. gaelium [5]	|	3. tech30338 [34]	|	3. katanic97 [41]	|	3. Africolo [56]	|	3. yhiaali3 [26]	|
4. Husna QA [35]	|	4. HashRate Hero [4]	|	4. arwin100 [32]	|	4. SirJohnVonSlotty [39]	|	4. Mr Reporter [51]	|	4. Ochan_yazo_tochant [13]	|
5. masulum [28]	|	5. graphtek [3]	|	5. PX-Z [30]	|	5. slackovic [35]	|	5. Karl_3000 [49]	|	5. OmegaStarScream [7]	|
6. kawetsriyanto [26]	|	6. oscar2000 [2]	|	6. julerz12 [26]	|	6. Rikafip [32]	|	6. Agbamoni [48]	|	6. GxSTxV [7]	|
7. mu_enrico [25]	|	7. ETZ-Swap [2]	|	7. GreatArkansas [23]	|	7. dkbit98 [23]	|	7. Charles-Tim [46]	|	7. hugeblack [6]	|
8. joniboini [23]	|	8. DenisDenis [1]	|	8. SatsPH [23]	|	8. Pmalek [19]	|	8. PremiumcryptoHub [45]	|	8. RedFlix [3]	|
9. taufik123 [21]	|	9. patrickus [1]	|	9. bhadz [22]	|	9. examplens [18]	|	9. Exitoral [41]	|	9. mikeywith [2]	|
10. dansus021 [20]	|	10. Halab [1]	|	10. coin-investor [22]	|	10. Trofo [13]	|	10. Sammye3 [40]	|	10. syriano [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [16]	|	1. Cointikka [50]	|	1. BlackHatCoiner [9]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [20]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [75]	|	1. Bd officer [24]	|
2. TryNinja [5]	|	2. JSRAW [48]	|	2. cryptosize [8]	|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [43]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [20]	|
3. inspace [2]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [27]	|	3. alani123 [2]	|	3. TryNinja [5]	|	3. Ab de villiers [36]	|	3. Crypto Library [12]	|
4. pawel7777 [1]	|	4. vivekdhyani1 [23]	|	4. Ultegra134 [2]	|	4. gigica viteazu` [1]	|	4. snowpega [32]	|	4. Z_MBFM [7]	|
5. EXMON [1]	|	5. pawanjain [22]	|	5. Dimitris [2]	|	5. othell_rogue [1]	|	5. HustleZ [32]	|	5. Shishir99 [5]	|
6. icopress [1]	|	6. eaLiTy [16]	|	6. BitcoinsGreece [2]	|	6. IonCreanga [1]	|	6. Rustam Meraj [30]	|	6. Review Master [4]	|
7. CryptoCrookz [1]	|	7. M47AK16 [9]	|	7. xProe [1]	|	7. b1ack [1]	|	7. Jaweria parveen [30]	|	7. Nothingtodo [4]	|
8. hexan123 [1]	|	8. TheUltraElite [6]	|	8. BetByRent [1]	|	8. BetByRent [1]	|	8. Abdul Sami786 [30]	|	8. Royal Cap [3]	|
9. StefanTaylor [1]	|	9. Jimmymoriarty [6]	|	9. manos555555 [1]	|		|	9. CryptoYar [29]	|	9. malekbaba [2]	|
10. vid3 [1]	|	10. Lostbtc05 [5]	|	10. katsman [1]	|		|	10. Junii [29]	|	10. shasan [2]	|

foi bem legal essa aposta, eu acompanhei uma boa parte dela, pelo menos o perdedor teve a responsabilidade de honrar o compromisso, agora é esperar pela proxxima aposta, o que eu acho dificil de ter, ja que não é mais novidade, portanto não vai ter o mesmo hype.

aliás, foi tantaa doideira que ate acharam o perfil do cara que controlava a conta mises kkkk o povo na internet acha tudo!

Caramba, eu nem lembrava mais disso!
Faz tanto tempo assim que estamos sofrendo com o preço do BTC? Parece que a gente se acostuma com coisa ruim, teve uns períodos de alta mas no geral estamos andando de lado já faz uns bons meses mesmo.


Sim, eu ia dizer a mesma coisa!
Eu sou esse tipo de pessoa, sempre que entro em uma aposta, trade, etc... começo a perder dinheiro por insitir em uma posição que parece não parar de sangrar nunca, aí quando pulo fora o movimento se inverte! E não foi uma nem duas vezes que isso aconteceu... abandonei!

Enfim, será que o Mises já vai pedir uma revanche e dobrar a aposta?

A aposta acabou dia 23

O bitmover deve ter se confundido por que a foto dele mostra a data 19/06/2026

A conta mises vs cerize que acompanhava postou que já foi quitado o pagamento da aposta https://x.com/MisesVsCerize/status/2069745604574449834

Eu tinha certeza que essa aposta já tinha acabado

O engraçado seria se quando acabasse a aposta o BTC tivesse um começo de uma alta bem forte hahaha
Seria legal, possível, mas bem improvável no momento

Isso me lembra que você pode acertar a direção do mercado no médio e longo prazo, mas o tempo é difícil, e muitas vezes você pode se alavancar, acertar a direção, mas ser liquidado ou perder dinheiro por causa do tempo

Nunca duvide de Bitcoin

Tinha visto esse gráfico há umas semanas e realmente não há nada que vá salvar o Mayall.. lembro que no começo o Bitcoin abriu uma boa vantagem, mas ai começou o ciclo de baixa..

Talvez ele pegou uma janela de tempo ruim.. era de quanto tempo mesmo essa aposta? 2 anos?

I agree with the reputation part 100%. If you scam here you have fucked yourself for anywhere else that I see your name long as it can be linked to the original place you scammed. Altcoins lets you teleport so you are 100% the same account from here if you scam.

Hi there! You've been invited to participate in this Request for Feedback (RfF), hence the pings. Due to the inconclusive feedback in Stage 1 & 2, this is currently Stage 3 of the process in order to determine the following question:

RfF Question: Is this an appropriate use of red trust?


Suggested answers, if preferred not to elaborate:

• Yes
• No
• Not interested
• Not sure / phone a friend
• Your answer here

Feedback so far from Stage 1 & 2 based on Vod's DT1 sponsors:


There is also some bonus material at the bottom regarding the neutral tag and doxxing evidence should that tickle your interest 

---

DT voting class as of last weeks data (excluding members who were pinged as part of Stage 1 & 2 + Vod who can't vote for himself).

---

I couldn't care less what the admin thinks about this or previous communication with you, as he doesn't determine forum policy. He is literally just "the tech guy", a guy who knows little to nothing about forum politics and drama over here

You might have been given permission for doxxing by the wrong person in the past, and if so, that permission has since been revoked. Hope that helps clarify things for you. But your doxx of OgNasty and request for personal info on theymos a day prior to that alleged PM (September 07, 2024, 01:01:01 AM) still remains on there, as the policy wasn't implemented retrospectively it seems. Based on the time-frame, I'm guessing it's to do with that. I won't link directly, but it was your first post on there that was since moved to the trash bin so easy to locate.

So looks like it's not just me who can prove that yes you have indeed doxxed, but instead anyone with an account there (fyi trash bin is hidden from public view). So that includes lawyers who sign up to the forum in order to verify it, oopsy daisy

Here's a redacted version, just to provide some context for others. I hope this eliminates any doubt over whether Vod would doxx a member of this community on another forum, or request personal info on another:



Note: I'm aware theymos' real name has been posted on here since 2011, I just don't feel the need to share that here as serves no value.

Bonus question: Do you guys still think Vod is fit for DT after pulling a similar stunt on this forum in 2019 ? Unlike last time, Vod is now doubling down on his doxxing. My opinion is that this is shocking behaviour from a DT member and nothing more than retaliatory feedback.

L0tt0 is always beautiful, the dev really has a nice collection of colours and knows exactly how to use them, I would say he's very talented with the use of colors, and this is coupled with the fact that yellow as the main color is a very nice choice, reason being that I personally hardly come across someone who doesnt like yellow, it's always pleasing to the eyes.

I am happy that the dev have continued to develop the casino not mind the low usage at the moment, this shows zeal and determination and this are the qualities that can lead any business to a good success.

Nice x there but unfortunately you didn't bet with a good amount of money, even a $5 bet would have made you $155, thats $150 profit and a $10 stake would have made you $310, thats a $300 profit, but I understand you probably was just testing out the game or something 😂, hope this type of luck still finds us when we all have started playing this games fully.

There might be an ability to tailorize your fuck you status an the various presumptions, so even though my latest table had not been updated since late 2025, you can still see how the historical trend has worked out, which has largely been the requirement of fewer and fewer bitcoin to sustain an income at any of the given presumed income levels in the charts... So the first category is $80k per year (presuming a 10% withdrawal rate and $800k valuation at the 200-WMA level), the second category is a traditional 4% withdrawal rate which would then require $2 million valued at the 200-WMA, and then the third category is a presumptive filthy rich status at $100 million valuation at the 200-WMA level.

Of course, with an actual fuck you status tool, then guys could make their own presumptions about what they might need, yet the tools main function would be to project the 200-WMA forward to perhaps 2157 or perhaps further, and then provide an interface to be able to see how the numbers might change if the guys change their own presumptions about how much they feel that they need.  The historical data is more locked in and would be similar to the locked in data that is already contained in the sustainable withdrawal tool, yet it seems that being able to project forward might be helpful, even if there might not be complete agreement on the parameters, presumptions and framework that the tool uses, yet in the past several years I have been honing in more and more on ways to valuate bitcoin holdings based on the 200-WMA and attempts to project that forward since I think that the 200-WMA provides greater assurances, even though quite a few guys seem to like to fight with the use of the 200-WMA since concededly we are actually buying and selling at spot price and not based on the 200-WMA - which still is not guaranteed to ongoingly go up, even though so far historically in bitcoins time on this earth, the 200-WMA has tended upward, with its lowest annualized upward performance in the ballpark of 18% during the June 2022 to October 2023 period, which happened to be the so far worst performance period of the BTC price relative to the 200-WMA.. getting as low as 36% below the 200-WMA on November 22 when the BTC price got down as low as $15,479, and also having a period of nearly 9 weeks from November 6, 2022 to January 16, 2023 that the BTC spot price was more than 20% below the 200-WMA..


The combination of the already existing sustainable withdrawal tool and the hypothetical fuck you status tool that does not quite exist, yet, may or may not end up sufficiently capturing the debasement of the dollar, and surely sometimes we might have to include some of our own presumptions, which I personally have come to thinking that the use of the 200-WMA (as a bottom price, that is not always the complete bottom) is a more fair way of valuating bitcoin and not getting caught up on great variations in the BTC spot price... and at the same time with the sustainable withdrawal tool, I like to proclaim that once a guy locks himself into a sustainable withdrawal amount that is soundly calculated, then he likely is able to raise the dollar value that he is sustainably withdrawing by 7% per year in order to attempt to account for anticipated ongoing debasement of the dollar. 

In the end, guys are responsible for their own calculations of valuation, what they believe to be sustainable and even how much (if any) they believe that they might be able to increase their withdrawal rate (based on the dollar or otherwise?) in order to keep their system of withdrawal going in a perpetual matter and not necessarily depleting the principle, so in that regard, in theory (and probably in practice) guys need to make sure that however much they might be withdrawing from their bitcoin holdings is less than the amount that on average the bitcoin is appreciating, even though from year to year the numbers might not work out... and personally, I prefer to try to have an extra cushion so that if a guy might consider in ideal circumstances when the BTC price is at least 25% above the 200-WMA, he might ONLY need 13 bitcoin to sustainably withdraw $80k and give himself a 7% raise in dollars each year, yet if the BTC price is spending a lot of time at or below the 200-WMA then either he needs to reduce his withdrawal rate or to make sure that he has enough bitcoin to cover such a situation, such as right now he would need at least 18.8 bitcoin to cover a sustainable $80k per year ($6,666 per month) withdrawal rate, even though if the BTC price were more than 25% above the 200-WMA he would ONLY need 13 BTC to sustain the same withdrawal rate.  So in that regard, it may well be better to have and maintain a higher quantity of BTC or alternatively withdraw at a lower rate, or maybe even don't withdraw at all until the 200-WMA (and/or BTC spot price) rises high enough to justify the target-preferred withdrawal rate level.


Personally, I think that guys can figure out these kinds of presumptions especially if they are starting to reach high enough levels of BTC that they might be able to sustainably withdraw.

It seems that on a quite regular basis, I witness guys getting confused by sustainable withdrawal ideas, so there are a lot of folks who just calculate how many years that they expect to need whatever level of income that they believe that they need and then they will divide the whole amount by that and deplete their whole bitcoin holdings based on those kinds of presumptions, which surely is not the way that I try to advocate, even though in the end guys can do whatever they like and they may or may not find uses for either the sustainable withdrawal tool or even a potentially future available fuck you status tool.. yet some guys might not completely get the whole idea of sustainable withdrawal, yet either or both of the tools might still help them to think through how much bitcoin that they believe that they need to meet their own objectives.


I think projecting the 200-WMA with an increasing diminishing return is a good tool, while at the same time, sure we might have to deal with future events that might change either how we think about bitcoin and/or if we might feel that we need to migrate over to some other better and/or more improved (or less damaged) bitcoin.

Winner:
19 - Road21Bitcoin

Winner 2:
09 - Ninja Primes

Winner 3:
28 - Hypnotizer

Verify

Please DM your bitz.io bitcoin deposit address to my main account.

Thank you! I will explore the solution.




Perhaps adding a few characters in the middle (3 or 4) could minimize that probability?

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 14562 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 9917 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5340 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1764 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11055 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4683 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2863 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2766 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 9795 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8815 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1525 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2523 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2357 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2975 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6232 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 6860 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3709 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10073 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 735 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 4386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11354 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11941 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 534 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (63) 21088 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 6354 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9985 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4115 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1930 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1495 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3835 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3573 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6782 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +93 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4602 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 15584 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3522 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (37) 12781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2297 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2078 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9860 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3587 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7517 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3422 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20835 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2863 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5682 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5735 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +49 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3725 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1499 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 846 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8070 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1881 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9847 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6405 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1275 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3522 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3373858: n0nce (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (5) 6074 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +40 / =0 / -0) (8664 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 5797: grue (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (494 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Não aparece especificamente que é uma taxa especifica para a própria wallet.
Aparece a informação genérica sobre todas as taxas da transação. Pelo que só percebi essa questão ao final de um ou dois movimentos, pequenos mas com taxas alegadamente de rede fora do comum.

Serviço eles prestam por suportar os nodes (digo eu).

São uma opção de mercado, como outra qualquer, não existe obrigatoriedade de fornecerem o software gratuitamente, mas precisam ser mais claros nisso.

Eu até admitiria eles fazerem isso noutras cripto. Agora no Bitcoin? É de mais sem duvida.

O pior, é que na app em si, não diz nada. Quando testei a app, fiz alguns movimentos de BTC e comecei a perceber que os valores recebidos eram diferentes do que era suposto. Então fui pesquisar e percebi dessas taxas.
Claro, que a "culpa" é minha, por não ter visto isso antes, mas mesmo assim...

Is the "Fuck you money" tool supposed to show how much bitcoin you need to possess for early retirement or is it something different entirely?
That might be a complicated thing to calculate. Inflation is certainly going to eat up and continue devaluing our fiat currencies for every year we are alive. We will require more and more units of fiat as purchasing power decreases. At the same time, it's pretty difficult to predict what bitcoin will be worth 10 or 20 years from now and how much it will change, if at all. History has shown us that BTC's value will go up but that's assuming we see the same or increased demand.

I have always wondered what would happen if a better form of bitcoin is created in the future...

Weekly update (2026-06-19_Fri_05.18h)


theymos' raw data (format: time    amount    msg    user_from    user_to)
Sample
Full list^* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2514 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 19 Jun 2026 04:36:03 AM CEST, Vod (history) sent 1 Merit to Charcol (history) for Re: Hello, why are the topics locked........
On Fri 19 Jun 2026 04:32:35 AM CEST, Brizi5000 (history) sent 3 Merit to casey15 (history) for Can the Average User Truly Self-Custody Bitcoin?.
On Fri 19 Jun 2026 04:26:06 AM CEST, PhilosopherKing (history) sent 1 Merit to uchegod-21 (history) for Re: What are the effects of inflation on ordinary people.
On Fri 19 Jun 2026 04:21:41 AM CEST, yhiaali3 (history) sent 1 Merit to GxSTxV (history) for كم من الخصوصية بقي لمستخدمي البيتكوين الي
.
On Fri 19 Jun 2026 04:01:58 AM CEST, Leahized (history) sent 5 Merit to Halab (history) for Re: The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (599 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8664 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 935 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3759674: VarJames (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3759725: godisreal (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3759766: KingVesting (history) earned: 4 Merit.
3759808: Kannibal Hektor (history) earned: 12 Merit.
3760228: lll555 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample
Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample
Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51495
Sample
Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26692
Sample
Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 336414 (14.38%)
Tuesday 336314 (14.37%)
Wednesday 335730 (14.35%)
Thursday 356195 (15.22%)
Friday 353891 (15.12%)
Saturday 307926 (13.16%)
Sunday 312846 (13.37%)
Total: 2339316

---

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions