Dá pra gerar chaves privadas que podem ser usadas como paper wallets através do BIP85, visite meu post sobre.


Mas vou continuar usando o BIP39 tbm.

Eu ainda preciso ver, ainda não está definido, e dá pra fazer isso de maneira segura tbm através de dispositivos offlines airgapped como a Krux.

Your reply did not changed my point of view.
Once again, I did not promote my service anywhere. It is one dev letting the other dev checking their work and expecting some comments. Spam is something else.
yes, I took it personally because I think you were rude. If you cannot appreciate others work, just ignore them. There is no reason telling peoples efforts are doomed to failure right from the start. What you call as failure is my success. You should do something better and let everyone see how you do it, and why your work is better than someone else. Moreover, this is not off-topic. I am still discussing about the tool built by bitmover and I. I appreciate he checked my tools.

Infelizmente vc ainda não entendeu o meu caso de uso, deixa quieto, o Bitcoin Core já me atende pro que eu preciso, já uso há quase 10 anos mesmo (e esse é um dos motivos).

Sim, eu sei que posso sugerir lá, mas precisa ser uma nova conta, pois não quero que relacione a minha conta lá que tem meu nome pessoal e foto com a minha conta do forum. Quando eu puder, eu crio uma conta lá e comento.

Eles já removeram o importprivkey já (eu sabia que eles removeriam uma hora ou outra). Acho que já até fiz post reclamando dessa remoção.

Estou pensando em aderir paper wallet ao meu setup e um computador offline airgapped, ainda não vou parar de usar hardware wallets, vou migrando aos poucos (embora usar hardware wallets seja muito bom).

Veja um exemplo de como ficaria de um mod que eu fiz que eu pedi pro grok builder fazer (vibecoding):







É a carteira ibis, uma carteira muito legal, parecida com a electrum e sparrow, ela tem a opção de import privkey. Fiz um post detalhado aqui

What service and promotion are you talking about?
Take a good look at my post, please. I posted about my tool on July 19, not just two days ago. I’m not sure why you’re being so aggressive about it. My website does not display any ads. I have a few tools on my website, and they are for people to learn more about Bitcoin. I am not making any money from it. I would actually appreciate it if someone created another website similar to mine for the Bitcoin community. I didn’t see this coming, to be honest. I don’t understand why the hate. But bitmover commented in my thread and made some good suggestions to improve one of my tools, which I implemented in a day, and he said he liked it.

Quote from: Z-tight
Is there a particular reason why it was renamed to 'Fast and White'?

Just clarity — "White" makes it obvious to newcomers that the coins are fully exchange-sourced, not routed through anything else. "Fast" alone didn't communicate that on its own.

Quote from: MarryWithBTC
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5580629.msg66994208#msg66994208

Tried pulling that one up but couldn't get it to load on our end right now — could you paste the relevant part directly here? Want to give you a proper answer rather than another guess.

Quote from: bitmover
I took a look at the rates.xml endpoint... I think details about what those numbers mean would be good. I got a bit confused

Quote from: examplens
I assume that <in>, <out>, and <amount> are random numbers, while <minamount> and <maxamount> express the actual minimum and maximum amounts

Quote from: bitmover
I opened this file a few moments ago and there were no xml tags, just the data. Maybe some server error?

Confirmed — that was a real server-side glitch, tags were intermittently dropping from the output. examplens' read on the fields was correct: <in>/<out>/<amount> reflect a sample exchange for reference, <minamount>/<maxamount> are the live limits for that pair. Should be consistently tagged now; let us know if it drops again.

Well, the names of the tags could guess at what it is about. I assume that <in>, <out>, and <amount> are random numbers, while <minamount> and <maxamount> express the actual minimum and maximum amounts that can be exchanged here. At least they are close to the amounts that are on the website these days.

Maybe the real issue what people need to look at is on how act in this situation, because I think it does not add much either AML result shows different in other AML checkers.

Since even if result shows that they are at low risk the exchange could still freeze it for whatever reasons they have.

But yet doing those pre screening could help, since it help users to reduce those possibilities of sudden account blocking. People can possibly see it as sort of risk management, but this one does not offer any guarantee to them.

The main problem with defining "high risk" is that AML scores can vary from platform to platform, and what is classified as low risk on one platform might be medium or high risk on another.

Therefore, unless these platforms offer address AML verification before depositing, all these steps are useless.

Most of the times, i forgot aml score checkers so... And i only do 1 transfer then to the exchange, this include from mixers and non kyc instant kyc exchange. But once  i transfer funds to cex i eventually withdraw it within the day to avoid future headaches. So far everything went fine, its just the exchange i use have this EU implemented policy too.

Parece um ciclo interminável, quando tava tudo certo, o povo foi lá e colocou o ladrão que já havia sido condenado e preso, parece que o povo esquece.

lula só ganhou em 2022 por conta da rejeição alta do bolsonaro e pela memória do povo do seu 1º mandado, onde ele não interferiu bastante na economia, mas nesse 3º mandado, se radicalizou totalmente pra esquerda. Falta de aviso não foi, o povo tá se f*dendo, mas parece que nunca aprende.

Tem uma grande diferença entre os dois.. esse ai é sair por impeachment.. algo que não vai acontecer.. é basicamente 10% de chance do Brasil ser um país sério.

O outro é sair por qualquer motivo, incluindo por assassinato, renúncia, etc..

Também pensei que o nome do Moraes impactaria o Lula.. pelo visto, não. As apostas no Renan também não se mexeram após a decisão lá ser revertida.

Good to know you liked it bitmover.
Yes, it is from our own calculation, not a third-party AML/KYT feed.
There is no chain analysis for that. The tool pulls public mainnet stats from mempool.space and then runs a simple internal heuristic on our server. It checks, transaction count, cumulative inflow, repeated deposits to the same address, how many distinct counterparties show up in the recent txs and whether there’s both inbound and outbound activity.

So for your address, a medium band with reuse/deposit factors is basically the tool saying: this address is used publicly and often, privacy/linkability risk is higher than a one-time fresh receive. That’s intentional, not a claim that the address is dirty.

É realmente bem estranho essas contas e essa troca de merits, enfim, qual seria o objetivo dessas contas? eu prefiro acreditar que não é uma coincidência, afinal, realmente é bem suspeito... e também tem o fator gambling, se uma conta conseguiu descobrir a aba gambling logo de cara é um fato a mais para se suspeitar.... porque se fosse um usuário orgânico, levaria algum tempo até descobrir a referida aba e a forma na qual participar dela com consistência leva a conseguir uma vaga em algumas campanhas... eu acredito que existam segundas intenções por trás disso tudo, eu não coloco minha mão no fogo... são fortes os indícios do objetivo delas.

People choose bitcoin as their store of wealth, as investment in long term, as their prosperity building tool, and the ultimate goal is getting richer with bitcoin. They might or might not take profit with their bitcoin, if they take profit they can take it all or only part of their Bitcoin portfolios but surely there is nothing wrong financially and in risk management aspect to take profit.

They can invest with DCA strategy, they can take profit, withdraw profit with DCA strategy.
They can take a look at this site and a given withdrawal method https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy
If they need discussions about that
[ANN] JJG Sustainable Bitcoin Withdrawal Strategy.

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan September 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 111 user (bertambah 4 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty vapourminer Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV SFR10 Lucius Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 decodx BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist ZAINmalik75 YodasRedRocket SirJohnVonSlotty

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty qwk Vod vapourminer mprep philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hybridsole stompix hilariousandco Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 Lucius TryNinja holydarkness tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro decodx BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket Mia Chloe

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana Husna QA roycilik YOSHIE

Sumber: DT update log September 2026

Thank you bitmover.
Good idea. I have added them.
Please check with some real address and let me know if you liked it.

However, I did not post about these new tools yet since I am still working on them.

This month 111 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

I came from bitmover thread.
Not exactly what you asked, but I have a user script that detects pgp signed message and Bitcoin signed messages, then add a verify button on the top of the posts. Clicking on the verify button shows the result. I will share some screenshots when I log in using my PC.

Eu disse pra vocês que tem algo sinistro acontecendo, todos que meritaram ele são contas ressuscitadas da era 2013 mais ou menos, pra mim tá mais que óbvio que essas contas foram hackeadas e está sendo usada como uma fazenda de contas que também miram boards locais. Não é possível que seja tudo coincidência esse tanto de contas antigas acordarem ao mesmo tempo, começarem a se meritar e interagir e fazer 10 posts num dia só.

Claro que, por uma incrível coincidência não for nada disso, é só seguir os diversos conselhos já dados e pronto. Não é difícil.

Thanks everyone for joining us.


No winners this week unfortunately.

Verify

Don't miss the next round: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5592865.0

 RULES

---

• We have now 10 slots! YES, 10 slots only
• You must complete a successful order with Priamex from the time this event is live until the deadline time.
  
• The winner takes all!
•  Last date to book your slot: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
• Pick a SLOT you like.
• You can not edit your entry. If necessary then remove the old entry and make a new one.
• We will find the winnersusing Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on the 💰 R7 Bounty Hunters - Telegram Chat
• My decisions are final, you must follow the Priamex Terms
• You will receive reward directly to your Bitcoin address.

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -

 ENTER

---

Accepted slots

---

Danke Dir für das monatliche Resümee! Als nächstes wäre dann eine Qualitative Auswertung der lokalen Boards ganz interessant, auch wenn das wiederum subjektive Ermessenssache wäre... 


Bei Platz 6. muss man aber aber jetzt noch keine Rede halten oder? 

Weiter fand ich persönlich auch noch diesen Teil vom [CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity ) super interessant, einfach um die Neugier "Wer ist denn so woher oder wo evt. beheimatet?" zu befriedigen und auch mal eine Übersicht zu haben, welche Accounts so mutmaßlich aus welchen Ländern kommen, ist denen Accounts ja schließlich nicht auf die Stirn tätowiert... 

Do you already scrape all posts? If not: I could let you know (within seconds) when a new posts is made in this thread. I just don't know how to tell you It would be cool to verify and quote staked addresses after a few seconds.

They can do that but by investing this way: using all investment capital to buy bitcoin with one purchase, they will have no money left for future purchases. Especially if they feel more interested in this market and want to invest more, or when they see better and cheaper prices but can not buy more.

It happens but when people let market situation affects their thinking, emotion and decisions, very likely they will fall into a cycle of fomo buying and panic selling that is never good and should be avoided.

With DCA strategy, people can do both purchases and withdrawals comfortably and gradually with time without emotional and psychological effects on their thinking, decision  making and action.

Two websites which are helpful for estimation of entries and exists (profit withdrawals) with DCA strategy.
https://costavg.com/
https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy

FTFY
You should make a bot for this

Glad to see a new tool added here.
Given that other similar tools have an incomplete list of currently active services, especially those present on the forum, I would suggest perhaps adding favorites, which will contain the address base of most active services. This would simplify the verification of the letter of guarantee, and the user would not have to additionally search for the signing address

Its time for yet another brief overview of local boards activity, and I am so late that I am literally writing this from hotel room, few hours before I have to check out and fly back home (otherwise I won't have time to do it before month ends).  All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during July 2026

During above mentioned period, 13928 posts were made across local boards, which is a small increase compared to June (13659). Top 5 most active boards remained almost the same as month before, with only Pakistan and German locals changing spots.

---

Active members per local board during July 2026

During July, 1298 members wrote at least one post across one of the local boards, and is yet again small increase  compared to June, during which 1290 members were active. Like in previous chart, there's no much change among the most active boards, with Nigerian remaining far ahead the others.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during July 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leaders are Romanian and Indian boards with 50%, while Pakistan had only 3% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket, leader is Polish board with 60%, while Turkish local board had only 20%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Turkish board with 52%, while French board (once again) had no members in that bracket.

---

Merit shared per local board during July 2026

During July, 5818 merit was sent across local boards that are part of this overview, and is a bog drop compared to June's numbers (6573). Majorify of this drop happened on German board, that went from 1267 merit sent in June to 612 in July. These kind of fluctuations aren't strange fro them, so I wouldn't be surprised if they go back to their old numbers.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during July 2026

During July, average merit per post ratio across local boards was 0.42, which is a drop compared to June's 0.48 merit per post. Italian board remained at the top, but what is noticeable that majority of local boards had lower July's ratio, compared to 12 month average.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during July 2026

During July, 509 members sent while 588 received merit, which is a small decrease compared to month before (525 senders, 601 receiver).

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during July 2026

Romanian board remained at the top of this chart, with Italian board right behind them, while others are a little bit further behind.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during July 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that gives more info on meriting habits of each local board. Having said that, it can be very deceiving as Greek board is at the top with basically having only 1 merit transaction during July.

---

The most active members per local board during July 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. Once again joker_josue from Portuguese board is at the top, folloed by chickito from Indonesian and Numeral from Russian local boards. GG guys!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Numeral [137]	|	1. mole0815 [72]	|	1. mandown [109]	|	1. babo [42]	|	1. joker_josue [139]	|	1. Filicius [37]	|
2. jokers10 [130]	|	2. Lakai01 [72]	|	2. Valcendier [81]	|	2. Italian Panic [42]	|	2. sabotag3x [98]	|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	|
3. klarki [116]	|	3. Soonandwaite [63]	|	3. yenerbatmaz [66]	|	3. fillippone [38]	|	3. bitmover [61]	|	3. darbitmobilerecovery [22]	|
4. safar1980 [105]	|	4. MinoRaiola [59]	|	4. MK-74 [61]	|	4. Ale88 [32]	|	4. alegotardo [53]	|	4. famososMuertos [19]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [96]	|	5. MaxMueller [55]	|	5. RaltcoinsB [60]	|	5. Plutosky [28]	|	5. TryNinja [43]	|	5. darxiaomi [15]	|
6. internetional [78]	|	6. jahead [51]	|	6. Mustang Shelby [58]	|	6. Ultimo2 [22]	|	6. Forsyth Jones [38]	|	6. Marmeladka.cc [13]	|
7. dwyane36 [63]	|	7. Real-Duke [48]	|	7. Hvdv [57]	|	7. alexrossi [21]	|	7. criptoevangelista [31]	|	7. Porfirii [10]	|
8. Alex077 [60]	|	8. cygan [40]	|	8. kriminall [54]	|	8. gbianchi [19]	|	8. rdluffy [29]	|	8. thesebassv [10]	|
9. xandry [52]	|	9. Unknown01 [34]	|	9. Phoenix Anka [54]	|	9. Brcbrc [16]	|	9. alexrossi [28]	|	9. GazetaBitcoin [9]	|
10. zasad@ [49]	|	10. 5tift [31]	|	10. Xyloo [53]	|	10. rtx10 [14]	|	10. Pumared [21]	|	10. Allo-obmen [9]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [138]	|	1. BinaryWizard [8]	|	1. Peanutswar [41]	|	1. Daniel91 [40]	|	1. Floxynice [75]	|	1. khaled0111 [34]	|
2. joniboini [51]	|	2. winspiral [6]	|	2. Asuspawer09 [37]	|	2. slackovic [34]	|	2. Charles-Tim [54]	|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	|
3. taufik123 [47]	|	3. Danydee [5]	|	3. tech30338 [37]	|	3. katanic97 [32]	|	3. Africolo [54]	|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	|
4. Luzin [39]	|	4. Perosy [5]	|	4. arwin100 [30]	|	4. Rikafip [31]	|	4. TrialBitcoin [51]	|	4. OmegaStarScream [15]	|
5. Husna QA [37]	|	5. TryNinja [3]	|	5. blockman [29]	|	5. Pmalek [26]	|	5. Mayor of ogba [46]	|	5. GxSTxV [10]	|
6. AakZaki [34]	|	6. DenisDenis [2]	|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	|	6. ovcijisir [22]	|	6. CryptopreneurBrainboss [42]	|	6. hugeblack [6]	|
7. mu_enrico [34]	|	7. Halab [2]	|	7. bhadz [23]	|	7. dkbit98 [15]	|	7. Tetu100 [42]	|	7. aseemhamza [5]	|
8. kawetsriyanto [32]	|	8. EXMON [2]	|	8. cryptoaddictchie [23]	|	8. cryptofrka [14]	|	8. Yablee0 [41]	|	8. Xmors [3]	|
9. masulum [24]	|	9. genius89 [2]	|	9. fighter2627 [23]	|	9. examplens [13]	|	9. Agbamoni [40]	|	9. lastpixellive [2]	|
10. salad daging [16]	|	10. lastpixellive [2]	|	10. coin-investor [22]	|	10. BitGoba [12]	|	10. Plutomanian [39]	|	10. nexguard [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [19]	|	1. Cointikka [34]	|	1. cryptosize [31]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [51]	|	1. Bd officer [19]	|
2. pawel7777 [4]	|	2. JSRAW [33]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [22]	|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	|	2. Bityar [42]	|	2. Review Master [13]	|
3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [28]	|	3. Conqueror777 [9]	|	3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Junii [39]	|	3. Shishir99 [11]	|
4. EXMON [2]	|	4. eaLiTy [27]	|	4. alani123 [3]	|	4. lastpixellive [2]	|	4. JunaidAzizi [38]	|	4. NNRR [8]	|
5. lastpixellive [1]	|	5. pawanjain [19]	|	5. Makis Kotzampasis [2]	|	5. jedaite [1]	|	5. Sawera2255@ [38]	|	5. Crypto Library [8]	|
6.	|	6. GazetaBitcoin [9]	|	6. Ultegra134 [1]	|	6. daniosem [1]	|	6. Abdul Sami786 [34]	|	6. Z_MBFM [8]	|
7.	|	7. vivekdhyani1 [4]	|	7. lastpixellive [1]	|	7. b1ack [1]	|	7. Nmjut [30]	|	7. Nothingtodo [7]	|
8.	|	8. weallbitcoiners [4]	|	8.	|	8. nexguard [1]	|	8. HustleZ [29]	|	8. DYING_S0UL [7]	|
9.	|	9. Nrcewker [3]	|	9.	|	9.	|	9. Fragrance1122 [29]	|	9. Tiger096 [4]	|
10.	|	10. TheUltraElite [3]	|	10.	|	10.	|	10. snowpega [27]	|	10. Murat [2]	|

Good to see a new addition on your website.
I have seen the same tool on multiple websites already. I think Bitlist also has it. But thanks for the new tool.


There is nothing to regret about it. Creating a new wallet does not cost you anything. You don't need to use the same wallet if you think using it will be a risk for you. I am glad that a Bitcoin wallet is free. I have signed a message from one of my addresses does not mean I will keep my funds in this wallet. I can always choose not to use it anymore. If you are afraid of signing a message using your Bitcoin wallet address, you can always choose PGP instead.

The only logical explanation is that they are following this thread, they saw my post, they put all their manpower on the task of bringing your server back online, and now everything is back to normal.

Yeah, most of the images don't load. But the way it is now it's already working so that is great.
@bitmover I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.

It was harder to access educational resources in the past but the development, application and massive adoption of Internet have changed many things including educational resources and learning for many people. Nowadays, in modern world, it's considerably more easy to find and access free and open-access educational resources. With connection to Internet, people who want to learn now can learn about many things freely without extra expensive cost paid to schools or courses.

They can easily search about Dollar Cost Averaging and learn about this strategy for long term accumulation and investment.
https://costavg.com/
https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy

I guess your webserver gives the "it doesn't exist" result when the image isn't generated fast enough. If you can somehow make the client wait a few seconds until it's done, it may work. But don't ask me how to implement this

Uma boa exchange. Lembro que ela era basicona. Até o visual do site era bem básico. Parecia feita no quarto de algum nerd de condomínio fechado.
Assim que vieram as primeiras regulamentações, eles trataram de fechar e sumir do mapa.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15033 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 10465 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5722 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2810 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11368 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 10060 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6900 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +46 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2238 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2182 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2184 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1951 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2389 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 13885 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3909 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4481 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3988 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11472 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 12149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2934 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (62) 21505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3153 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6727 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3708 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4236 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2033 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2337 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15655 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3695 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 13344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2387 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2659 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3684 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7684 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 21334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2610 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5802 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3795 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4179 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 859 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5753 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8251 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10049 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6503 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1022 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Let's test this with Pmalek's list:

Don't blame bitmover, it's my server that's "missing". It makes me think of the scene in Silicon Valley where they threw all their servers at the back of a rental van.

Hi bitmover,

All the images in my Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos thread are down at the moment. I noticed it late last night. Any idea what could have happened? Did something maybe change on your end recently? I will tag @LoyceV as well since I am also getting data from his for that table of mine.

Please don't let us talk about the information that may help the hacker to successfully mix the stolen Bitcoin due to this forum's powerful backlinks, because the hacker is technically looking for means to do it, which is why the 65BTC was used as a test. Besides, the hackers are still stealing from people who are still using the vulnerable coldcard wallet.
https://x.com/intangiblecoins/status/2093457952103387618
https://cktripwire.com/

The problem is it's not the signing setup but it's the fact that you never agreed to the device.

Whatever you build. build a second independent implementation of anything that comes from those same words to get the xpub from.Before funding anything get the xpub from those same words on a second indepndent implementation of anything you build. Same words and same xpub. I think both sparrow and electrum will do it from seed without the internet access. If both are the same then the device has not silently replaced or corrupted the text you entered. Otherwis you know that at the time the wallet was empty.

The whole thing this mess argues for is that one cannot estimate entropy from the output and vice versa a device to which one gave good entropy. The only element in the chain that can be verified is cross derivation.

The point is there are many advantages to making use of linux especially in the case of bitcoin you have added perks like understanding how important open source codes actually are plus you have a full view of everything happening on your system unlike windows. The only difference is Linux is slightly harder because of it's structure but it's worth it.

I think this is even the most important part of using Linux aside from its open source features. You'll be more accustomed to command line codes. Tails is also a good one but less popular.

Eu estou como o Bitmover, essas dados geográficos são sempre muito subjetivos.

Quando ao numero de transações se ter mantido, acho que é sinal na confiança que existe no Bitcoin de modo geral. Um caso com o Coldcard, num outro tipo de mercado/ativo, provavelmente teriam um impacto bem mais significativo.

De resto, os números mostram que o mercado está mais ou menos estável, o que é algo positivo. Começando a dar sinais de animo. Veremos.

I enter my seed phrase into a hardware wallet that is:

100% open source.
Airgapped.
Stateless.

Airgapped means the device never connects to the internet, or to anything at all. The device communicates using a camera and a screen. Hackers can't reach it over the internet.

Stateless means my seed is never saved on the device. When the device turns off, the seed and the wallet are wiped. If the device gets lost or stolen, no worries. There's nothing on it.

I never save my seed on any device, ever.

To use an airgapped and stateless device, you need a coordinator app, just as you use with any hardware wallet. I'm a fan of Sparrow for desktop, and Blue Wallet for mobile. Nunchuk is great too, for managing xpubs, but it's not as user friendly.

Surely you realize quoting Ledger about their closed source code is the same as quoting Coinkite about ColdCard's closed source code. In May, they said it was the best. How'd that work out?

I do not understand why people trust code that isn't open source. It makes no sense.

In theory, you know how Ledger's code is supposed to function, according to Ledger. But hackers aren't going to use the code as intended. They're going to find exploits. And since Ledger devices have the ability to export the seed out of the device over the internet (which for years they swore wasn't even possible!), their code is one heck of a honeypot just waiting to be hacked.

And I do not understand why people trust companies after they lied. Ledger said this:


That was a lie. It's one of many lies they had to scrub from their website because their firmware contains an API to extract keys from their devices over the internet, which for years they swore was not possible.

Here's a lie that cracks me up.


That's printed on the box of a closed-source Ledger hardware wallet:
https://i.redd.it/dysdk6j9516b1.jpg

And here's a great quote from BTChip, Ledger owner & co-founder


He obviously can't prove it, because his code isn't open.

Trusting Ledger's word today is like Trusting Coinkite's word in May.

My point was that passphrases do work as an additional security layer. How well they work depends on their length and complexity. I am in no way advocating for people to stay with Coldcard and keep using them. I think and hope that the company is done and that we won't see them come back from this. I am advocating for using complex passphrases as seed extensions, though. A good passphrase could have saved some of those people who lost their coins, giving them some time to find and set up a different storage for their coins when the hacking began.

A 12-word seed generates 128 bits of entropy. A 24-word seed generates 256 bits. 128 bits of entropy is enough. If you make your Trezor generate a 24-word seed, just like Ledger does, you would get the same 256 bits.

Appreciate all three of you catching this — genuinely useful pushback. The intent was never to add a mixing feature; the idea was to let users avoid the extra network fee/spread from routing USDT through BTC and back when all they actually need is the same asset on a different chain. That's a network-switch use case, not a mixing one — but we can see how the wording read otherwise.

To be clear: there's no mixer coming. We'll stick to what examplens suggested — framing this properly as USDT network conversion (ERC-20 ↔ TRC-20), not same-network round-tripping. Thanks for keeping us out of trouble on this one.

Detalhe: Date Registered:   August 11, 2010, 02:24:01 PM

Temos um user bem antigo entre nós
Cuide bem da sua conta diggler 
Não é sempre que temos alguém de 2010 registrado aqui

Faça posts orgânicos, participe, se tem dúvidas pergunte antes. Se você postar conteúdo de IA pode mesmo ser banido

Aside from the issue with the ban on this forum, I think that the "mixer feature" would be an unnecessary attraction of negative attention to the service. At the same time, accepting critical USDT has a special risk due to the possible blocking of coins by Tether.
The option was announced by the DEX strain as a conversion, and perhaps the closest would be, for example, a conversion from ERC20 to TRC20 or vice versa. Where it would be presented as the focus of switching the network on which the coins are. In a way, it wouldn't be direct mixing feature

He's probably the only member of this forum who still thinks everyone else is spreading conspiracy theories when it comes to Ledger - the very fact that the seed can be remotely extracted from that device should have been a warning sign the moment the news was confirmed.

It's not a question of whether this "feature" will be abused one day, it's just a question of when it will happen. Given that this company still produces and sells devices, I would conclude that a very large number of those who use hardware wallets have no idea what risks they are exposed to.

I'm not buying it. The initial story was that your seed can't leave the device at all. Now it needs your PIN. What's stopping the firmware from not asking the PIN at all?

You're quoting Ledger, the company that lied that seed phrases could not leave the device. They're in the trust business, lying once means I'll never trust a word they say again.

This. ~
[/quote]
That image doesn't show anything about Trezor's Random Number Generator. It's well known that 12 seed words provide less entropy than 24 words, and that it's sufficient anyway. But you're free to stick to 24 words (that's what I did).

I've seen that picture before, they use "10²² years" and "many times longer than the age of the universe". That's weird, because "10²² years" is already 700 billion times longer than the age of the universe.

If you had looked at this picture a quarter of an hour before the Coldcard exploit, it would have looked extremely different (if I am able to make myself understood).
What I mean is: again, you are trusting someone whose entropy is good. Why are you putting this trust in a scheme that has already failed once, instead of removing it in the first place?