Last update: 2026-03-14_Sat_09.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
bitmover receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. bitmover
2. FeeBuddy
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "bitmover" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66507532 (unedited backup) (by Somegory) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 09:22:37 CET 2026) in [Newbies] Read this before you stake an address:
And for someone who likes privacy more they won't want to share their main BTC address to avoid balance reveal to the public.
It's all well and good.
You can share an address with zero balance that you will never use. It doesnt matter, and it wont reveal anything about it.
You just to prove that you owned the private key at the time you staked the address and you still own it now (when claiming the account)
This is true 😩😩😩 my brain isn't braining, if not, why didn't I think of this before? Thanks for the heads up
2. Post 66507360 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 07:30:02 CET 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-03-06_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1772764974 1 178336.msg66455385 2393114 35501
1772764736 1 178336.msg66478141 198573 120694
1772763701 1 178336.msg66478147 120694 64507
1772763446 2 2235093.msg66476891 1166480 1039323
1772763342 2 5452055.msg66475602 1166480 885256
1772762958 1 5559383.msg65816214 997187 2654005
1772762720 1 178336.msg66477157 252510 2755547
1772762680 4 5564839.msg66477070 1166480 1028592
1772762027 1 178336.msg66478141 64507 120694
1772760459 1 5576527.msg66478122 3570710 3558380
1772759283 2 5576474.msg66475449 3322606 1143990
1772758516 3 232519.msg66474236 2746686 3470490
1772758486 2 232519.msg66478051 2746686 3503706
1772758419 1 232519.msg66476503 2746686 3594134
1772758337 1 5574307.msg66477002 1593137 2812492
1772757962 1 5576324.msg66471770 3714097 422859
1772757949 1 5576324.msg66470604 3714097 140584
1772756799 1 5572151.msg66317887 2393114 30747
1772755911 1 5573622.msg66477940 1593137 2850161
1772753841 4 5576086.msg66464904 33156 290195
1772753813 4 5576086.msg66461797 33156 3357194
1772753740 1 5576329.msg66470829 33156 2590147
1772753333 3 5576282.msg66471918 1554927 3578252
1772753176 2 5576315.msg66469977 1554927 846936
1772752658 1 5576474.msg66475449 33156 1143990
1772752560 1 5575870.msg66453441 802441 1980983
1772752457 1 5576102.msg66476822 3559419 3718382
1772752151 2 5575984.msg66467816 1045971 3613415
1772752069 1 178336.msg66477300 33156 64507
1772751732 2 5571678.msg66418241 3548615 3667887
1772751725 1 5376945.msg66477326 252510 3708159
1772751348 2 5575285.msg66434890 3730852 3730997
1772750712 1 5575953.msg66457459 2393114 33156
1772750361 5 5553695.msg65682650 51173 1192397
1772750225 5 5576326.msg66470533 51173 30747
1772749762 10 5575905.msg66455968 51173 289817
1772749650 1 1220979.msg66476947 140584 18321
1772749648 5 1383758.msg66470451 51173 35
1772749606 1 5576404.msg66473214 846936 1031572
1772749406 3 5575049.msg66467861 3711603 2679380
1772748800 1 5576516.msg66477644 557798 846936
1772748645 2 5568567.msg66453410 3730997 3664632
1772748585 1 5576393.msg66473402 846936 983960
1772748025 1 178336.msg66474414 198573 1089623
1772747877 1 178336.msg66473796 198573 252510
1772747779 1 5571375.msg66477575 3687357 1852120
1772747772 1 5571375.msg66477360 3687357 1410401
1772747442 1 301480.msg66477091 1593137 945923
1772747210 5 5571375.msg66463854 1852120 3687357
1772747054 3 5571375.msg66477360 1852120 1410401
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (55 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2770 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:42:54 AM CET,
ESG (
history) sent 1 Merit to
cAPSLOCK (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:38:56 AM CET,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
xhomerx10 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:21:41 AM CET,
xhomerx10 (
history) sent 1 Merit to
philipma1957 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:17:26 AM CET,
Julien_Olynpic (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Goran_ (
history) for
Re: Последний вагон на север.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:15:42 AM CET,
Julien_Olynpic (
history) sent 2 Merit to
summonerrk (
history) for
Re: Биткойн-оптимизм..
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (581 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8393 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 878 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3748768:
ghoulMAX (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3748978:
Meggie Leen (
history) earned: 4 Merit.
3749052:
cezar1 (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3749153:
yowbow (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3749597:
Allicedreim123 (
history) earned: 7 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3745203: cephalopod
3745458: goblintester
3745512: Decimetre
3745514: HighwayLost81
3745612: cLoazyL
3745615: viruz06
3745624: rishib
3745871: Lethobios
3745932: jasonstacks
3746105: Dicey12
3746177: wavelife1
3746196: LUSUBY
3746294: tcatm2
3746381: flowingcapital
3746429: Tete130
3746445: MomusReign
3746499: kazikbalaganiarz
3746721: AnisEverRise
3746729: evgpokrow
3746827: rony_btc
3746871: xdxiug
3747125: TraderKnows007
3747215: highpay-ads
3747260: Glum_Climate_5517
3747322: Ngozi26
3747467: Dollartree
3747543: jinx_22
3747640: Mark00101
3747685: oxynaz
3747701: JonasKernDE
3747712: Mr intelligence
3747726: Spicoli
3747820: statumx
3747833: Chifather247
3747903: needsumhelp
3747917: billy.grabow
3747918: btchelp.io
3748112: ranswar
3748386: martschlo
3748434: alkalineph13
3748484: GemUtxo
3748490: luthen
3748579: Der_Gegenwert
3748655: deX001
3748702: Batractoxin
3748768: ghoulMAX
3748978: Meggie Leen
3749052: cezar1
3749153: yowbow
3749597: Allicedreim123
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8393
4:0:878
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:773
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14328:14311
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:301
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1470
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3745203:0:3
3745458:1:15
3745512:0:3
3745514:0:11
3745612:0:11
3745615:0:1
3745624:0:14
3745871:0:4
3745932:2:6
3746105:0:1
3746177:0:1
3746196:2:4
3746294:0:10
3746381:0:5
3746429:0:3
3746445:0:2
3746499:0:1
3746721:0:1
3746729:0:2
3746827:0:15
3746871:0:3
3747125:0:73
3747215:0:1
3747260:0:16
3747322:0:1
3747467:0:3
3747543:0:7
3747640:0:2
3747685:0:1
3747701:0:9
3747712:0:1
3747726:0:1
3747820:0:3
3747833:0:2
3747903:0:1
3747917:0:2
3747918:0:1
3748112:0:1
3748386:0:3
3748434:0:1
3748484:0:12
3748490:0:6
3748579:0:2
3748655:0:1
3748702:0:1
3748768:0:1
3748978:0:4
3749052:0:2
3749153:0:1
3749597:0:7
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51060Sample 1. 20319 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1102 unique users in 11726 transactions
2. 20075 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 745 unique users in 11009 transactions
3. 18882 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9982 transactions
4. 15206 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8765 transactions
5. 14311 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1222 unique users in 5132 transactions
6. 13050 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 711 unique users in 8704 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11893 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 580 unique users in 4556 transactions
9. 11600 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 490 unique users in 6434 transactions
10. 11269 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6554 transactions
11. 11257 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6449 transactions
12. 10946 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 504 unique users in 5705 transactions
13. 10573 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 579 unique users in 6050 transactions
14. 9852 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 329 unique users in 5060 transactions
15. 9613 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 638 unique users in 5206 transactions
16. 9558 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 524 unique users in 4430 transactions
17. 9461 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 335 unique users in 3400 transactions
18. 9429 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 452 unique users in 4717 transactions
19. 9380 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 435 unique users in 5131 transactions
20. 9315 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 539 unique users in 4241 transactions
21. 9262 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 391 unique users in 3280 transactions
22. 8801 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 535 unique users in 4752 transactions
23. 8557 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 453 unique users in 5074 transactions
24. 8520 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4842 transactions
25. 8519 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 568 unique users in 5018 transactions
26. 8458 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 403 unique users in 4397 transactions
27. 8393 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 406 unique users in 897 transactions
28. 7784 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 456 unique users in 4300 transactions
29. 7569 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4117 transactions
30. 7311 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 579 unique users in 4352 transactions
31. 7134 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 404 unique users in 3642 transactions
32. 6924 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 229 unique users in 1782 transactions
33. 6657 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 276 unique users in 3013 transactions
34. 6630 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 373 unique users in 3339 transactions
35. 6623 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 387 unique users in 3615 transactions
36. 6590 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 939 unique users in 4263 transactions
37. 6534 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 197 unique users in 3808 transactions
38. 6502 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 482 unique users in 3608 transactions
39. 6304 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3628 transactions
40. 6293 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 623 unique users in 3531 transactions
41. 6262 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 418 unique users in 3645 transactions
42. 6220 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 524 unique users in 3626 transactions
43. 6186 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 332 unique users in 2926 transactions
44. 6155 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 220 unique users in 3606 transactions
45. 6123 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 414 unique users in 3354 transactions
46. 6089 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 456 unique users in 3414 transactions
47. 6057 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 195 unique users in 2634 transactions
48. 5920 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 203 unique users in 3414 transactions
49. 5506 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 380 unique users in 2593 transactions
50. 5497 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 414 unique users in 2689 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51011. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51012. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51013. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51014. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51015. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51016. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51017. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51018. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51019. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51020. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51021. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51022. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51023. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51024. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51025. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51026. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51027. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51028. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51029. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51030. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51031. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51032. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51033. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51034. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51035. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51036. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51037. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51038. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51039. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51040. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51041. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51042. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51043. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51044. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51045. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51046. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51047. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51048. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51049. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51050. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51051. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51052. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51053. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51054. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51055. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51056. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51057. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51058. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51059. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51060. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26571Sample 1. 72146 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 898 unique users in 12632 transactions
2. 67496 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2193 unique users in 29234 transactions
3. 66293 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3320 unique users in 17577 transactions
4. 58556 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3572 unique users in 56355 transactions
5. 57848 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4591 unique users in 33198 transactions
6. 49447 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3660 unique users in 34223 transactions
7. 43485 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2831 unique users in 15350 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38193 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2961 unique users in 30986 transactions
10. 37505 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2511 unique users in 13928 transactions
11. 34115 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1579 unique users in 13802 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 32033 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1469 unique users in 10302 transactions
14. 29922 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2100 unique users in 10546 transactions
15. 28480 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1425 unique users in 7493 transactions
16. 27981 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1683 unique users in 6598 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22991 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1377 unique users in 9491 transactions
20. 22822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6439 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 17340 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1715 unique users in 3928 transactions
23. 16099 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 744 unique users in 5947 transactions
24. 16095 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1968 unique users in 6531 transactions
25. 15739 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1714 unique users in 7310 transactions
26. 15546 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 533 unique users in 7299 transactions
27. 15246 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1170 unique users in 8991 transactions
28. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
29. 14347 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1292 unique users in 8147 transactions
30. 14328 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1103 unique users in 1752 transactions
31. 13944 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1659 unique users in 7270 transactions
32. 13280 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3604 transactions
33. 13140 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2998 unique users in 7000 transactions
34. 13080 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1334 unique users in 7310 transactions
35. 13076 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1303 unique users in 5844 transactions
36. 12937 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1129 unique users in 7892 transactions
37. 12819 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 823 unique users in 6069 transactions
38. 12767 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 822 unique users in 4206 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11229 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1154 unique users in 6211 transactions
41. 10507 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 543 unique users in 3945 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8230 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1040 unique users in 3577 transactions
45. 8164 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 753 unique users in 7163 transactions
46. 8077 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3301 transactions
47. 7942 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 572 unique users in 6930 transactions
48. 7907 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 944 unique users in 3466 transactions
49. 7483 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 508 unique users in 5924 transactions
50. 7126 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 516 unique users in 4038 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26522. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26523. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26524. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26525. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26526. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26527. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26528. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26529. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26530. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26531. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26532. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26533. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26534. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26535. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26536. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26537. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26538. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26539. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26540. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26541. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26542. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26543. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26544. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26545. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26546. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26547. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26548. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26549. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26550. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26551. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26552. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26553. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26554. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26555. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26556. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26557. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26558. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26559. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26560. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26561. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26562. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26563. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26564. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26565. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26566. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26567. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26568. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26569. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26570. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26571. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 326172 (14.36%)
Tuesday 324912 (14.30%)
Wednesday 324978 (14.30%)
Thursday 346238 (15.24%)
Friday 344027 (15.14%)
Saturday 300504 (13.23%)
Sunday 304208 (13.39%)
Total: 2271039
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
3. Post 66505799 (unedited backup) (by criptoevangelista) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 19:47:55 CET 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
Ele ta tentando segurar a inflação
Reduzir impostos no diesel que afeta todos os produtos, e depois botar um imposto que torna quase impeditivo exportar o petroleo. Dai meio que vai sobrar uma producao para vender mais barato aqui dentro.
As maravilhas das intervenções federais na economia
O diesel sempre foi um problema no Brasil e até então nunca teve alguém disposto a resovler de verdade, sem conta o LIXO que é o biodiesel que arrebenta com os carros, aonde já se viu um combustivel que vai resto de gordura de peixe, gordura de animais, um monte de porcaria que dizem ser melhor para o meio ambiente, mas detona com tudo, encarecendo ainda mais os fretes por conta de maior manutenção de motores, bicos e bombas injetoras... cara... o diesel APODRECE em 1 mês, é coisa de maluco, vira uma borra, entope tudo, detona com os motores, e um motor diesel pra você arrumar passa fácil de 40, 50 mil reais! isso de carros pequenos, de caminhoes passa facil disso.. enfim, nossa gasolina é uma bosta, mas o diesel é um negocio bem crítico, de verdade, e ainda querem aumentar essa porcaria de biodiesel pra 30% ...
4. Post 66505271 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 17:16:55 CET 2026) in Onde estavas em 3 de janeiro de 2009?:
Era só vc minerar um bloco entre 2009 e 2010 e você estaria com 50 BTC e você estaria de boa...
A questão é que na época, ter 50BTC não significava ter dinheiro. Antes, que estavas a fazer parte de um projeto e ideologia, que ia mais além do que um aspeto econômico.
Não dava nem pra comprar uma pizza
@Forsyth Jones, vi que voce criou sua conta no forum em 2017. O Btc vale 700 USD nessa epoca
Se voce tivesse comprado 7 mil dólares no dia que abriu a conta no forum (10 BTC), hoje voce teria cerca de 720mil dólares, ou quase 4 milhões de reais
É um cenário mais provável!
Tem vários exemplos de pessoas que ganharam na loteria e rapidamente voltaram a ficar sem nada..
Com o Bitcoin é ainda pior.. é uma loteria em camera lenta, como costumam dizer.. então muita gente vai vendendo conforme sobe um pouco e quando vê já está sem nada.
O cara precisava ter uma excelente educação financeira, seja em 2010 ou 2017, para não vender.. digo excelente porque era difícil acreditar numa moeda descentralizada, muitos economistas estudados desdenharam/não entenderam até hoje o Bitcoin..
O próprio Vitalik vendeu uma porrada de Ethereum a US$ 0,99.. imagina só.
Agora, eu duvido muito de alguém que hoje diz, que em 2011 já achava que isto ia valer milhões. Dizer, isso hoje é fácil, mas na época? Não é visionário, é um salto de fé.
Deve ter alguns malucos como o Hal Finney.. uma pena que ele faleceu cedo e não pode acompanhar a trajetória do BTC.
5. Post 66505162 (unedited backup) (by Pumared) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 16:40:25 CET 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
Kalshi fechou parceria com a XP:
XP ta virando uma casa de Bet! Que tempos...
Lula aparece como favorito com 59%, abrindo bastante desde o início de outubro quando estava quase empatado com o Tarcísio.. Parece ter muitos fãs do Renan Santos tanto apostando quanto nos comentários também.
Já está bme menos, com 45%. E o mais inteerssante é que se somar os de direita todos , passa o lula.
Quem diria hein. Será que o Brasil ganha dos comunas nas eleições desse ano?
O povo nem ligou pra isenção dos 5k. É tanto aumento de imposto que nem perceberam kkk
Já começou as medidas populistas para ganhar voto. Atacou logo no principal e que pode dar dor de cabeça que é o Diesel.
Lula zera impostos sobre o diesel e taxará exportação de petróleo. O engraçado é que na fala dele foi dito que seria um sacrifício fazer um corte de imposto.
Lula foi o primeiro a falar e anunciou a redução dos impostos como um “sacrifício enorme”. Segundo ele, essa é a “medida que vai fazer com que nós cortemos impostos sobre a importação para evitarmos o aumento de preços”.
Acredito que logo o Flávio deva passar dele, pois foi muito imposto em tão pouco tempo. E isso ficou muito estampado. Mas não é uma certeza, como sempre o brasileiro tem memoria curta.
6. Post 66504761 (unedited backup) (by arwin100) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 14:49:31 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
Yes, some ask depending on the amount you win, if the money is very huge they'll feel you're trying to launder money with their platforms and request for it, although it's true that some use it as a market strateg, knowing fully well that lots of gamblers would prefer casinos that offers privacy to one's that would require them to expose their important documents online. Just that some gamblers don't read TOS to see where casinos that claim to be KYC free specify that they have the right to change their policy if need be.
This makes no sense. If you win big, there is no money to be launder. You sent a few bucks and you are withdrawing thousands of dollars that you made betting.
Launder money would be a situation where you sent a big amount of dirty money before betting. It would make sense to convert to another coin and withdrawal, or make a few low risk bets and withdrawal another coin, etc. Just to get different coins
Right, since winning big from small amount they bet is not really a case of laundering. That's provably legit withdrawal especially if the money came from their winning, I don't see any disguising and doing such illegal act with that scenario.
Money laundering schemes would only happen if they try place low risk and small bets for a while then immediately withdraw their funds then they try to make it look like those funds they withdraw is clean which came from the casino.
7. Post 66503947 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 09:46:38 CET 2026) in Help me test my SSH app:
Can you explain a little bit more about the use cases? Would be to securely connect to repos to install applications?
Will it work in windows, or android only (looks like a play store screenshot)
I use ssh to login into servers, github, etc. Personally I dont use to install apps
It's just an SSH client. The kind you can download to your phone and connect to servers and then open a terminal. Like Termux.
Yeah, it's Android only.
8. Post 66503508 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 05:26:07 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
That deepest dip in Sortino probably corresponded to Jan 2015 where many people got discouraged at the very end of the bear market.
That was one of the hardest moments for me, being approx. 45% under on a (for me) HUGE investment!!!! Everyone preached to me that I was wrong!!!
Since we are going through war stories, I am going to give some ballpark ideas to suggest that my level of agony was likely worse than your agony during that late 2014 and throughout 2015 timeframe.
My accounting kind of sucks, yet it seems to me that when I started in bitcoin my first few BTC purchases were a wee bit high, including my very first purchase was right around $1,200 per BTC, yet I was paying a premium since it was a peer to peer transaction, yet that was the top of the market so my further purchases through 2014 brought my average cot per BTC down to about $570 by November of 2014 and then I was down to about $550 per BTC average by the beginning of 2015.
So there were various dips that the BTC price went down to right around (or slightly below) $160 in early January (so that would be 70% down for my then holdings), yet I felt that throughout 2015, my average cost per BTC continued to come down and the BTC price dips did not go down as low.. since it seems to me that buy the time we had another test of $200 in around September 2015, my average costs per BTC were approaching $500, so then that would mean that I was only 60% in the hole by that time.
Of course, I had some other issues, that currently contributes to my now wanting to proclaim that my average cost per BTC is around $1k.. I especially started making that claim since about 2017.. . .yet even using $1k per BTC as my then newly estimated average, there weren't any meaningful dips below $1k once we got past April of 2017.
My punchline still is that if you are proclaiming that you ONLY were down around 45%, then your level of down was much less than mine for around that time.
Just the beginning of my plate training, though I also felt maxpain in late 2017 after watching it go from 17,966 to 3k (again, I was told how stoopid I was).
Huh? How could that be pain, relatively speaking?
Earlier you had suggested that you were not selling any of your bitcoin, so you were going through pain based on your going from a higher state of profits (on paper) and then to a lower state of profits (on paper) and based on feeling stupid for not having had sold as your friends, family and perhaps other acquaintances were pointing at you and laughing because you could have had sold out at 40x-ish profits, but instead you were ONLY able to potentially sell in the ballpark of 6x profits..
That period was less painful to me, since I felt at that time that I was still more than 3x profits even at the lowest price points in that timeframe - even though there weren't really a loss of folks calling for $1,500 and even lower prices as if such level of dip "technically" "had to happen," and we later found out that such level of dip did not "have to happen."
Upgraded to titanium via ole Bob-O... Don't get me wrong, the last time, even though it was hard watching it go from 69k back to 17k, somehow it was less hard, as my .63 BTC had grown substantially.
I can relate to the 0.63 BTC - and I am going to say that my amounts were higher prior to 2017... but shit happens.
Remember, the pie-in-the-sky number was 32K; that was the dream.
That was Adam's number.. and yeah, folks were not necessarily on the same page as Adam.. but at the same time, such numbers were not outside of the visions of "where we could go.".. not that anyone was really selling in great quantities on the way up.
Oh, how far we've come!!! 126k down to now has been mind-bending but not a real concern. Could I have followed LFC and made more? Hell yeah, I could have, but I also could have gone all in on the block wars and followed Craig to my demise, fo sho. Do I wish I had more? Yeah, but I am extremely grateful to be in the position I am in now!
Selling is generally not a great route to building more holdings, even though surely when you get a large enough stash, then you should not necessarily hesitate to sell a bit here and there along the way... but yeah, maybe your stash size is one of those "in-between" sizes that is not quite there, yet... not that "we" really need to know particulars, unless you start to brag about how BIG of a BALLER you happen to be. hahahahaha
Also coming to terms with time-based selling rather than price-based selling has also taken the pressure off as I can always not sell, as the bot (Jjg) says.
Yeah, but I do both. I started price-based selling in 2015, and I started experimenting with time based selling in late 2022.
I personally think that price based selling makes more sense to start first. It seems easier to justify for selling first.
Time based selling seems to imply a higher cushion, just to be comfortable with it... yet
even right now, a guy with 15.2 BTC or more should feel sufficiently comfortable that he would be able to sustainably withdraw at $80k per year and to increase his dollar withdrawal amount by 7% per year.
Of course the amount that works for sustainable withdrawal would be higher or lower based on the quantity of BTC...and perhaps the extent to which a person might want to retain a bit of a cushion with his quantity of BTC so that he does not end up withdrawing too much too soon.
But if I am bettering my current life, then it's worth it,
It seems to me that your life should already be better by having had accumulated whatever stash that you have built up, even if you have not started to cash out yet.
as the one thing we can't buy is time, and I bet Bob doesn't regret (much, anyways) building the ranch or Jimbo's lake. One day I hope to be able to rent an Airbnb at both though!!!!
I just wish I could use my time more efficiently and not think about what-ifs; it will definitely drive a man crazy!
K
That's true.
If it wasn't for brash geopolitics and the absolute stupidity of politicians, Bitcoin would be at 100K at least.
I think we would not need btc at all if nationalism and crooked politicians.
That is true.
If people were honest
(ie. not self-interested) (and perhaps like robots?), then we would not need bitcoin.
[edited out]
Yeah pick a number for the end of owning btc say 90years in my case.
So
90-69= 21 sales of my btc.
I think on my 70th birthday I should have 2 coins
So If I begin selling off in 2027
Jan 2027 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2028 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2029 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2030 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2031 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2032 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2033 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2034 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2035 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2036 sell 0.1btc
I will be 80 in 2037 and have a coin left
A simple plan
Even if you get up to 2 BTC by January 2027, then you still have to have 0.0105 BTC available when you turn 105 (that is if you turn 105) and you said that you want to have double that.
I think that you should wait a couple years before you make your first sale... maybe start at the earliest in Jan 2028.
You could also use my sustainable withdrawal tool, and sell 15% of the dollar value of the 200-WMA.
Right now, for 2 BTC, using 15% per year based on the 200WMA valuation, my tool (designed by bitmover) is showing $1,322 per month... I am sure it will be higher in 2027 or even likely to be higher if you were to wait until 2028
9. Post 66502727 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 22:42:32 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
Regarding "depressed", I wouldn't be at 30K or 37-38K, so it is mostly academic.
I would be sad if bitcoin completely vanishes, but it is not in the "cycles" afaik
.
I would likely start to get a bit depressed if we go below $45k, and maybe even getting wee bit depressed earlier than that, even though I would still be in 45x profits (more or less).
I would think that my 45x in profits (if we end up going there?) is likely way better than OgNasty's ability to buy back for 1/2 price or even 1/4 price, even if he were able to achieve such a feat... which is probably in his imagination, alone (absent his inclinations to spin and exaggerate, which he is quite inclined to engage in those behaviors and he even seems to persuade a few gullible folks in regards to his supposed self-proclaimed BIG BALLER status)..
And, gosh, a world without bitcoin, as if it were to go to zero: That would be difficult to imagine. There would be quite a few depressed peeps that would come out of such a development, and surely wondering the implications of such an outrageous outcome were such a thing actually play out or be able to play out.
yet, for sure OgNasty is still smarter than the rest of us dummies who are active in this thread, and even his having had supposedly sold most if not all of his 20 coins in this last price run, may well end up with way less than 20, if he does not end up buying them back. .since besides his lack of humility, he seems to be a bit of a greedy ass fuck too.. hahahahaha.
Why do you pretend you know how much BTC I have?
I have a working theory - that is actually a pretty good one.
Why do you sell 4% of your stack every year?
Within my authorization I could sell up to 10% of the 200-WMA dollar value as long as the BTC price is at least 25% above the 200-WMA.
I don't even sell close to my authorized levels.... which is not really a big deal... especially if we might recognize that overall my holdings are in the ballpark of 70x higher than my costs.. so I could sell various small percentages at any time and it is not really changing my portfolio size by very much..
And, yeah, my profit level (on paper) went from about 126x and down to as low as 60x, and now (as I type) floating around 70x... not really a BIG deal.. at least I have coins rather than being in dollars and having hypothetical coins, which seems to be your current status after selling most, if not all, of your coins.
Even if I might say that in 2017 through 2020, my average cost per coin was in the ballpark of $1k per coin, so if you might recall that the BTC price went up to $19,666 in late 2017, so that would be around 19.6x in profits, and then we had bitcoin corrections that spent quite a bit of time in 2018 through 2020 in the ranges of $3,124 to $10k for much of that time, event hough later, especially starting in late 2020, we largely broke above $20k and stayed above $20k, so maybe the hardest time was at various points between 201 and 2020 to have dips that brought my holdings to get as low as 3.124x in profits.. .. so yeah those were tougher times to ONLY have profits in the 3.124x to 10x territories... as compared to the supposed pain these days of only 60x to 70x profits (on paper) and your prediction that my profit might go into the 30x to 50x territories, which may well be your little fantasy rather than anything that really ends up happening in the real world. Yet you still have the ongoing dilemma (based on lack of fulfillment) regarding when and how to buy back..
Why don’t you do ANYTHING to support Bitcoin?
You seem to be arguing from a position of desperation, to the extent that any guys (including yours truly) have any obligation to do anything for bitcoin.
You have shot yourself in the foot by failing refusing to hold bitcoin, while you are trying to put yourself out there as a bitcoin expert and even a trading expert, yet even in your last trade, you have turned yourself into a low coiner or perhaps a no coiner and you are bragging about it, as if that kinds of an approach to bitcoin were a good idea.
You are free to do whatever you like, yet when you are bragging about being smarter than everyone else, then that seems both incorrect but also contrary to your own facts of selling way too much coins too soon in 2017, yet you want to proclaim that dumbass mistake does not count... like you did not know any better or that you did not know about cycles and blah blah blah, even though claiming yourself to be an expert. Those are not even my words. You are the one who said that you were an expert.
You are a leech. A flea dangling from the nuts of Bitcoiners like myself. Clinging for dear life in the hopes you can sell Bitcoin like a market parasite the rest of your life to support yourself. You are pathetic and a negative addition to Bitcoin. You should honestly be ashamed to post here.
I have bitcoin and you don't, even though you claim to have been profited by selling most if not all of yours.
I doubt that guys are concerned that guys are selling some of their bitcoin from time to time, especially if the guys have reached overaccumulation status - to the extent that you could even imagine what overaccumulation status is.
Sure, your goals might be greater than being able to have a mostly passive income from bitcoin, yet if you were to have
20 bitcoin right now, then you could still withdraw right around $8,800 per month (or $105k) per year (and with an ability to increase your dollar withdrawal rate by 7% per year forever and ever), so sure maybe you have a goal to have more bitcoin before you start to withdraw from your bitcoin - to the extent that you even understand how to deploy such a practice.
For sure, there is a considerable amount of latitude in terms of how guys might choose to manage their bitcoin holdings once they have reached a status that the consider to be enough or more than enough bitcoin.
In one of your earlier posts, you seemed to be having a dilemma whether you would be buying back your bitcoin or perhaps getting into some other kind of a potential investment with whatever proceeds that you might have from the bitcoin that you supposedly sold.
Sure, perhaps you are the more true bitcoiner who is just considering his options... Right? I doubt that any of us is really proclaiming that there is ONLY one way to be a bitcoiner, yet it seems like when claiming to be a good bitcoiner, it would help to have some bitcoin.
10. Post 66502009 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 19:32:19 CET 2026) in [ANN] bitcoindata.science:
But, as i have seen many websites using cloudflare stats, I think they are OK to use and share too
Cloudflare's stats may not really be entirely certain. But, usually it's not for less, it's for more
Therefore, this data is more than enough to get an idea of the movement you feel on the site.
There is no problem using them as a reference, and they are totally valid.
Therefore, he is to be congratulated for the success of the website/project.
11. Post 66499800 (unedited backup) (by Franklyn-wood) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 06:14:49 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
KYC is just a process and not measurement on how reliable the casino. New casinos can actually ask this requirements that's why they should not make it as basis to believe immediately that those casino do this is automatically a trusted platform.
I agree. Certainly there are many reliable casinos that perform KYC.
Kyc becomes a problem when the casino just freezes your funds , basically taking them hostage and asks for endless kyc and personal documents , which are very sensitive information
Yeah that's the part where I have a problem with when they won't tell you of kyc from the start and all of a sudden freeze your account and start asking for kyc especially like you said endless kyc, I mean it's very annoying what if you have some serious funds in this casino and would probably want to perform certain transactions you wouldn't be able to that because of some unnecessary endless kyc.
Well having known that this kind of occurrence will come into action for casinos with no KYC, it will be safer for each gambler who is security conscious to have all the possible information required for KYC available with him or her to avoid being locked up at the point of celebrating and withdrawing wining, because this is what usually ends happening to gamblers who sees no kyc as a quick and easy way to quickly get back what ever interested they are expecting from the site without any interference and later victims of blocked account, inability to withdraw or send funds into accounts and more as the case maybe.
12. Post 66499306 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 00:08:01 CET 2026) in Onde estavas em 3 de janeiro de 2009?:
Bem, eu não lembro ao certo o que eu estava fazendo, mas eu provavelmente estava de férias da escola, jogando PS2 um god of war, GTA 'sandera' ou no PC (meu primeiro computador era daqueles de monitor de tubo que pesava 1 tonelada).
Época muito boa, eu lembro daquela época em que a estética era outra, os designs dos sites, aplicativos era na forma chapada, cheio de entornos, o sistema muito usado ainda era o Windows XP e o Windows 7 era novidade... saudades do frutiger aero, aquela vibe futurista e super nostálgica... naquela época os forums (como esse) eram muito populares e eu sempre estava vasculhando em fóruns vasculhando tutoriais de games..
Pergunta interessante, eu nunca havia pensado nisso. Sempre pensava em dataas como 2013 ou 2015 quadno eu ouvi falar de bitcoin a primeira vez e não me interessei o suficiente pra comprar...
Em 3 de janeiro de 2009 eu estava "de férias" na Bahia, pensando que eu precisava arrumar um emprego e era já formado há um ano e não trabalhava ainda
Era só vc minerar um bloco entre 2009 e 2010 e você estaria com 50 BTC e você estaria de boa...
13. Post 66499218 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 23:41:50 CET 2026) in CZ agora é mais rico que Bill Gates, segundo a Forbes:
É incrível essa falta de transparência que existe no mundo cripto (o que é positivo e negativo ao mesmo tempo). CZ deve ter bilhões em ativos que ninguém sabe. Altcoins, stablecoins, bitcoin, etc, em dezenas ou até centenas de carteiras.
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill gates, etc tem o dinheiro deles em ações das empresas que eles fundaram. Além de transparência, o dinheiro deles está "skin in the game", nas empresas que eles comandam ou comandaram.
Neste caso a Forbes diz que a fortuna dele está ligada a própria Binance mesmo.. diz que a empresa vale US$ 100 bilhões e ele tem 90% dela (então US$ 90 bilhões).. mas como é privada, chutam qualquer valor.
Bitcoin eles dizem que o CZ tem só 1.400 moedas (US$ 99 milhões)..
No passado o próprio CZ disse que só tinha Bitcoin (1,32%) e BNB (98,48%).. então fazendo uma regra de 3, ele teria uns US$ 7,4 bilhões em BNB (ou US$ 10 bilhões já que o BNB subiu uns 36,5% contra o BTC desde então).
Os outros US$ 11 bilhões, não sei de onde tiraram
talvez da YZi Labs (antiga Binance Labs) e outras empresas menores dele.
Outro nome que vale a pena acompanhar é do Giancarlo Devasini, na 22ª posição com US$ 89,3 bilhões.. é o dono da Tether
14. Post 66498653 (unedited backup) (by Cricktor) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 20:58:37 CET 2026) in 2.62x BTC dumped to legacy address of Genesis block:
While it took more than a month to trigger a new sufficiently high entry, there was quite some dust spamming and some larger "donations" which just didn't surpass my arbitrary threshold.
Past March 14
th, 2025 large
equal/over 500k sats transfers to Genesis block descriptor:
Current balance at time of this post according to
combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50
BTC of coinbase tx: 107.15905497
BTC (includes 1,638sat pending confirmation, the difference (0.05909203
BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).
This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptorsee below accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt
15. Post 66498298 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 19:27:13 CET 2026) in CZ agora é mais rico que Bill Gates, segundo a Forbes:
É incrível essa falta de transparência que existe no mundo cripto (o que é positivo e negativo ao mesmo tempo). CZ deve ter bilhões em ativos que ninguém sabe. Altcoins, stablecoins, bitcoin, etc, em dezenas ou até centenas de carteiras.
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill gates, etc tem o dinheiro deles em ações das empresas que eles fundaram. Além de transparência, o dinheiro deles está "skin in the game", nas empresas que eles comandam ou comandaram.
O mesmo vale para esses magnatas das tecnologias.
Porque com toda a certeza eles terão a nível pessoal, uns bons milhares em BTC (principalmente).
Agora, de facto será sempre difícil ter uma real noção do dinheiro que o CZ, e equivalentes, tem. Todos os valores são meramente estimativas, salvo o valor das suas empresas, no mercado.
16. Post 66497847 (unedited backup) (by knuckey) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 17:16:01 CET 2026) in First goal prediction and winner ($15 rewards):
list of participants
Bobcrypto 31
Celsius 28
Economix 33
Leahized 37
Report 13
Btclover2025 25
Bommanbs 25
furious7 26
bitbit97 55
Pastaral 88
bitmover 23
Mr. Allcrypto 22
AIRWAYS 35
Caicedo 17
MarianRejewski 44
Gposas 19
rdluffy 46
Basedjack 42
Blowon 27
rachael9385 18
kai 11
Red_hamba 48
Highpressure 33
erus 52
Elvis 25
Altsfanatic 28
BlockLens 8
Azharul 22
MusaPk 15
Donneski 16
odunybiz 27
Pumared 15
Yoona_As 23
CONVOAI 10
vanesha 37
malcovi2 18
Dr.Osh 50
Faizan Zen 32
tvplus006 19
Taricoins 49
Ignore 7
Porfirii 55
Dip69 5
Barcode_ 21
bitzizzix 27
johnsaributua 19
cumakoff 12
17. Post 66497173 (unedited backup) (by Zoomic) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 13:29:50 CET 2026) in Are Wrench attacks the result of adoption?:
I agree. I was always very careful in social networks, avoiding even to follow crypto websites with my personal account.
Nowadays I am a bit more relaxed, as crypto is more popular and common, but I am still very reserved about my crypto investments.
People talk too much online about crypto or in real life. Those are the first targets.
My mind has never crossed not following crypto websites on social media. I know that such groups and pages are always target for attack. I follow those pages for information, but many atimes they dish out wrong information. But no matter how wrong the information are, I would never comment on the post. I'm always silent and mute
Social media networks are potentially very harmful for us in psychology and mental health, not only with our account security and fund safety. It's easily to open social media applications, accounts and get attracted by many status, posts, tweets, short videos, reels and all of them possibly consume a lot of time from us. Over using social media platforms will make our psychological and mental health worse, even weaken our physical health too by lack of enough physical activities and exercises.
I am also surprised why people are yet to understand how algorithm has dealt with us. Social media is so terrible that the algorithm decides what you read and it might decided to be wicked at you and be showing you one pattern of post that will gradually influnce your brain.
18. Post 66496898 (unedited backup) (by Gentle_Soul) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 11:42:55 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
KYC is just a process and not measurement on how reliable the casino. New casinos can actually ask this requirements that's why they should not make it as basis to believe immediately that those casino do this is automatically a trusted platform.
I agree. Certainly there are many reliable casinos that perform KYC.
Kyc becomes a problem when the casino just freezes your funds , basically taking them hostage and asks for endless kyc and personal documents , which are very sensitive information
Yeah that's the part where I have a problem with when they won't tell you of kyc from the start and all of a sudden freeze your account and start asking for kyc especially like you said endless kyc, I mean it's very annoying what if you have some serious funds in this casino and would probably want to perform certain transactions you wouldn't be able to that because of some unnecessary endless kyc.
19. Post 66496027 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 02:30:25 CET 2026) in Are Wrench attacks the result of adoption?:
I agree. I was always very careful in social networks, avoiding even to follow crypto websites with my personal account.
Nowadays I am a bit more relaxed, as crypto is more popular and common, but I am still very reserved about my crypto investments.
People talk too much online about crypto or in real life. Those are the first targets.
Social media networks are potentially very harmful for us in psychology and mental health, not only with our account security and fund safety. It's easily to open social media applications, accounts and get attracted by many status, posts, tweets, short videos, reels and all of them possibly consume a lot of time from us. Over using social media platforms will make our psychological and mental health worse, even weaken our physical health too by lack of enough physical activities and exercises.
With people who are in Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, it's quite right like you said, social media can bring potential security exploitation and data breaches.
The cryptocurrency scambook with many scam types including phishing scams with fake accounts on social media.
20. Post 66495252 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 21:15:02 CET 2026) in Are Wrench attacks the result of adoption?:
This $5 wrench attack doesn't need you to be a big hodler, hence you are identified as a bitcoiner or a crypto someone, they already assume that you are filty rich, even if your portfolio is $100
Most of them sees “Mike S.” Whenever they learn you are into crypto
..while you’re busy dealing with the mental stress from market ups and down
.
Nowadays I am a bit more relaxed, as crypto is more popular and common, but I am still very reserved about my crypto investments.
People talk too much online about crypto or in real life. Those are the first targets.
I don’t even talk about it, I’m just a regular dude with my personal account, comments are mostly cute, Nice , good pov
.. There are sometimes I would love too engage in some discussion but your comments also give a sense of how well you are into it and of course could make you a target.
21. Post 66493123 (unedited backup) (by betswift) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 09:59:43 CET 2026) in On Ray Dalio's there can only be 1 gold, bitcoin vs. gold:
@bitmover. Agreed! This is what I am arguing. The future children today who will grow up on year 2050 will see bitcoin or gold and it will only be something similar for them. They will be ordinary, mainstream investments. Bitcoin might also be less volatile because of increased available liquidity.
Totally believe in the volatility part. If things will go where they are headed now, it will be a bigger cap -> bigger demand to push it around, meaning volatility will be less of a factor..
22. Post 66492449 (unedited backup) (by bbc.reporter) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 02:30:01 CET 2026) in On Ray Dalio's there can only be 1 gold, bitcoin vs. gold:
@bitmover. Agreed! This is what I am arguing. The future children today who will grow up on year 2050 will see bitcoin or gold and it will only be something similar for them. They will be ordinary, mainstream investments. Bitcoin might also be less volatile because of increased available liquidity.
23. Post 66491584 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 21:14:55 CET 2026) in l0tt0.com:
I remember that I once lost 0.01 btc in a dice game. Then I sent more 0.01 to try to recover it, and lost again.
Now it is a 1350 usd loss in silly bets lol
you can't call yourself a gambler if you haven't done that at least once, lol
man, this brings back memories (good and bad ones), i remember i did the same thing on bitsler, but the damage wasn't as small as 0.01 btc, i even rage quit gambling and deleted both my account and my bitcoin wallet at the time.
24. Post 66491431 (unedited backup) (by Donneski) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 20:19:49 CET 2026) in Cold Storage Is Not Enough:
People over think very simple stuff.
Hardware wallet is the way to go.
Note down the seed in a piece of paper and another as a backup.
Save in 2 separate locations.
Done. 99.999999% safe.
I actually agree that hardware wallets provide a very strong foundation for self-custody and and for many users that setup already removes most of the common risks.
Just like I said in my response to @Charles-Tim, the topic isn't against hardware wallets. The point I was trying to highlight is that once the seed phrase is written down and a backup is created in another location, the security model shifts toward protecting those backups themselves. At that stage we already have multiple places where the recovery information exists which naturally introduces multiple points where it could potentially be exposed or mishandled over time.
So the idea behind the topic was simply that cold storage solves the online risk but the human side of key management still requires careful attention.
25. Post 66490963 (unedited backup) (by rat03gopoh) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 18:17:14 CET 2026) in Cold Storage Is Not Enough:
People over think very simple stuff.
Hardware wallet is the way to go.
Note down the seed in a piece of paper and another as a backup.
Save in 2 separate locations.
Done. 99.999999% safe.
Another simple thing to think about before the final step, "know the environment where you will be storing your backups."
26. Post 66490710 (unedited backup) (by Hatchy) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 17:21:01 CET 2026) in Is it okay to lock a post after getting answers?:
I just have a simple question to ask as a newbie that I am, so i can know how best to contribute here.
The question is this;
Is it okay to lock a post upon getting the desired answer you need or just let it run for more future opinions?
If you have received an answer to your question and you are completely satisfied with it, it is advisable to close the topic to prevent further spam.
I understand this point of view but I don't think this is beneficial to the community
Often the situation changes. A correct answer 6 months ago may be incomplete now. Or even worse, someone might have given an imprecise answer, the OP is satisfied and locked, and now nobody can give him the correct answer.
This is why stackoverflow topics remains open forever. And answers evolve over time there, they can even be edited by other users later on to update it
27. Post 66489955 (unedited backup) (by Fivestar4everMVP) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 14:39:31 CET 2026) in l0tt0.com:
...
I participated in YoloDice (already closed casino) signature campaign for years, and they paid directly in their account, 0.01 BTC per week (less than $100 at the time).
I remember that I once lost 0.01 btc in a dice game. Then I sent more 0.01 to try to recover it, and lost again.
Now it is a 1350 usd loss in silly bets lol
That is pretty much the same reason I prefer to use stablecoins to gamble, instead of Bitcoin or even other floating Cryptocurrencies like Litecoin.
In the end, Bitcoin is a scarce resource used to transfer value in a decentralized way and FIAT can be inflated and manipulated at will by a handful of individuals in the United States, European Union and China. Making the bulkd of their citizens to lose their wealth gradually.
Funnily enough, if one gambles with USDT or USDC in a couple of decades one could look back to one's wagwr an realize how much value it has lost. But this is very much still better than spending bitcoin or any other currency capable of appreciating in price alongside bitcoin on gambling, because if in a decade, you spend $3000 USDT on gambling for example, you are rest assured that that value will remain the same, that value will always be $3000 .
But imagine you spend the same $3000 worth of bitcoin on gambling, or let's just say that you had plan of spending not more than $3000 worth of bitcoin on gambling in a decade, if before then the crypto market enters a very good period, you will discover that you won't even gamble up to a decade and the dollar value of that number of bitcoins you have lost would have surpassed that $3000 target..
Spending bitcoin or any other good investment currencies like litecoin on gambling always appear to me as a double loss because we all know that it takes one being extremely lucky to gamble in a session and end in profit, and this is still no guarantee as well because profit made today can be lost tomorrow when you return to gamble, so to avoid being disappointed, I usually treat money reserved for gambling as money already lost.
28. Post 66489855 (unedited backup) (by Hispo) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 14:11:19 CET 2026) in l0tt0.com:
...
I participated in YoloDice (already closed casino) signature campaign for years, and they paid directly in their account, 0.01 BTC per week (less than $100 at the time).
I remember that I once lost 0.01 btc in a dice game. Then I sent more 0.01 to try to recover it, and lost again.
Now it is a 1350 usd loss in silly bets lol
That is pretty much the same reason I prefer to use stablecoins to gamble, instead of Bitcoin or even other floating Cryptocurrencies like Litecoin.
In the end, Bitcoin is a scarce resource used to transfer value in a decentralized way and FIAT can be inflated and manipulated at will by a handful of individuals in the United States, European Union and China. Making the bulkd of their citizens to lose their wealth gradually.
Funnily enough, if one gambles with USDT or USDC in a couple of decades one could look back to one's wagwr an realize how much value it has lost.
29. Post 66487504 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Sun Mar 8 20:45:19 CET 2026) in Diretrizes para o uso de IA:
Acho que existem AI melhores e piores para determinados assuntos, e tb usar a versão paga faz diferença.
Outro dia ouvi falar que estavam usando duas IAs, uma como uma espécie de firewall para a outra.
Talvez a evolução dessas IAs seja algo assim.. juntar duas ou mais para que uma revise o texto da outra para evitar alucinações..
Acho que ainda tem muito o que evoluir.
Gemini eu testei, deletaram um chat meu inteiro e nem sequer explicaram o motivo.. cancelei a assinatura.
Enfim, tem que ser muito cuidadoso com o uso.. se erram até em coisas bobas, imagina nas complexas.
30. Post 66487057 (unedited backup) (by r_victory) (scraped on Sun Mar 8 18:34:55 CET 2026) in Diretrizes para o uso de IA:
Acho que existem AI melhores e piores para determinados assuntos, e tb usar a versão paga faz diferença.
Atualmente a que eu mais gosto de usar é o gemini. Consegui a versão pro numa promocao de estudante, acho muito boa e nao vejo tantas alucinações..
Também gosto de usar o Gemini e também consegui essa promoção
O bom dessa versão é que temos acesso não somente a ele, mas às outras, como o Nano Banana, o VEO e o meu preferido, o NotebookLM, por permitir que você selecione suas próprias fontes, é ótimo para estudar, é o que mais uso, gosto de subir uns livros que tenho em PDF e praticamente "conversar" com o livro/autor, é bem legal.
Em relação aos usuários que postam textos gerados por IA, o maior problema é que a maioria nem lê o que foi escrito, copia e cola sem nem verificar se a IA alucinou. É uma ótima ferramenta para produção de conteúdo, mas tem que revisar, não dá para confiar totalmente.
Concordo que o theymos faça uma revisão sobre o uso de IA, confesso que isso é uma praga que pega as pessoas e fazem elas se acomodar, postar coisas inúteis, sem sentido e com o mínimo de esforço.
Enfim, já passei uns perrengues com a IA por aqui, e concordo que é hora de impor limites antes que a bagunça se torne algo normal.
E o pior é que isso está acontecendo fora do fórum também. O pessoal com esse papo de que a IA faz tudo está enchendo o YouTube com um monte de vídeo, muitas vezes mal feito, mal narrado, com um monte de erro. Gosto muito de assistir a alguns documentários, mas quando noto que a narração ou as imagens são geradas por IA, nem continuo assistindo. Por exemplo, tem canais que narram livros, e o diferencial agora está em dizer que a narração é 100% humana...
Não sei que preguiça medonha que esse povo tem de narrar um vídeo de 15 minutos
31. Post 66487045 (unedited backup) (by notocactus) (scraped on Sun Mar 8 18:32:20 CET 2026) in Can someone explain what moderators do and if they get paid?:
Yes, they do get paid .
I don't know exactly how much , but it is based on their activity. I saw some moderators talking about it in the past.
theymos talked about that years ago. Each moderator has a Bitcoin address in their account profile.
I believe theymos has posted the info before in previous years and I think somebody else requested it (maybe redsn0w) within the last year or so (and I think theymos may have said he will release it once all the accounting is done (though don't quote me on that)). I also would like to know how much the forum takes in and actually profits on.
hilariousetc talked about this thread
Question about forum finances (again, 2017).
32. Post 66486485 (unedited backup) (by need-leed) (scraped on Sun Mar 8 15:30:43 CET 2026) in 💎✅ Need someone to find me web design clients - paying 💰$150+ per lead:
You should show your portfolio. Past work , experience, etc... as you don't have reputation here, you should show yourself to us
As I mentioned in my post, I'd be happy to do that, but I'd prefer to do it via DM.
I work for large companies that probably wouldn't want me to share such things publicly.
33. Post 66485950 (unedited backup) (by coinrifft) (scraped on Sun Mar 8 11:32:25 CET 2026) in Can someone explain what moderators do and if they get paid?:
Yes, they do get paid .
I don't know exactly how much , but it is based on their activity. I saw some moderators talking about it in the past.
Paying is important to incentive people to work.
Yes, just like what EFS said,
Theymos pick moderators. We get paid but that's not guaranteed, we are volunteers and not employees.
Regarding the question on how to be a moderator:
There will only be one moderator.
Report history is the most important consideration for a moderator candidate. Over the forum's many years, relatively "newbie" members with good report histories have consistently done much better as mods than veteran, well-respected members with poor report histories. That said, not all reports are equal, so a simple report count doesn't tell the whole story. Also, in addition to report histories, it's necessary to consider factors such as the ability of the candidate to be neutral, their trustworthiness, etc. It's also nice to choose a moderator who people generally already trust/respect, but sometimes this is outweighed by other factors.
If a poll is created, I will not completely ignore the results, but I will also not use it as a primary influence. I'm more interested in arguments people have for or against certain candidates.
Old era, not sure if this still works though,
Q: Where can I find all the moderators/staff/administrators?A: Just go to the Member search page (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=mlist;sa=search), untick all the boxes and then tick "Search by position". To find all regular moderators like board moderators, local moderators or
patrollers (site-wide newbie moderators), search for "
Staff" (without the quotation marks). To find all global moderators, search for "
Global Moderator". To find all admins, search for "
Administrator".
34. Post 66484649 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 23:10:25 CET 2026) in 1win $1000 X Giveaway 🔥 10 winners :
| BLOCK | | HASH | |
| 939631 | | 00000000000000000001bb354b5948a5cd0cea9292317be91756c28abf491c3b |
| 939632 | | 00000000000000000001a9dc8f665840b2ff37fcae6d4474d47f98199aa61f6c |
| 939633 | | 000000000000000000010d3f29873766376ffcd8c443973062e92f56791f7f41 |
| 939634 | | 0000000000000000000105d6e750d9fc2894b77a5f5525d37a4d2a4c863d4901 |
| 939635 | | 000000000000000000008361ece6119dc48e9aae3e589fb1d8af6695866f6510 |
| 939636 | | 0000000000000000000109bc3354a0f96030c0856838df7beaff4c5553b65bb0 |
| 939637 | | 00000000000000000001d0dff6a68230eff60368f4f0efa2ea0918f431fe91f4 |
| 939638 | | 00000000000000000001916e4a28146bd06ff6e9eb983827e6d6f08df2a291e6 |
| 939639 | | 00000000000000000001ec6203d6e894cc33086d260cd3031fb7e417665b0c8f |
| 939640 | | 00000000000000000001e762bbfe3427c24eb6e6f58d2832324106bc79e9760f |
GOOD LUCK.
Seems like no one was able to get a correct four digit which means no winners! However, we need to find our winners and to get that I have decided to engage our community in a new concept of draw process.
I need 10 volunteers. After this post please let me know if you want to volunteer to conduct a draw.Here are the list of the users who participated in this campaign.
odunybiz
Improved
atomicarthur
Qjmak333
btooonn
Leahized
wanguda
vivekdhyani1
Danydee
xandry
xGennady
Takiya24
Tinubu
Teethow
Itz-prisigold
WhattheFk
jayce
vanesha
Kadelvibess
Odenleva09
Ksmertz
majorow
HarvestOpan
Ricardo11
Woodie
Yoona_As
malcovi2
f150
GxSTxV
BtcAnalyst1
Dr.Osh
julerz12
knuckey
inearth
LokhcfyBit
Protonvive
HausaBitCkk
bitzizzix
Using the
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager you will find a winner and post the winners name. Each volunteer will help me to find one winner.
I will take note of the next 10 posts for our volunteers.
35. Post 66484606 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 22:56:01 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Very true
You have known me for a long time now, buddy. That is how I roll
You will notice my emotions begin to get a little more twitchy at certain stages of the supposed
four year cycle. I expect around late 2028 to Q2 2029 you will see me getting increasingly annoyed at corrections and pauses in uppity. At that point you can assume I am relatively low in fiat and needing Bitcoin to pump. But hopefully 2029 is a real year of up only and you just see me shit posting and dropping memes. That way you can assume that I am doing well and dumping fat bags haha.
4-year cycles? What cycles? I thought the consensus here was that they don't exist (anymore)... Or so they say...
Consensus does not necessarily win bets.. hahahahaha
Joking aside, 2029 will be the year that will prove or disprove the cycle theory. That, or an early, massive pump with a stream of big ATHs, well before that year.
Regardless, coiners with 20 coins and above are unaffected. At least that's how I see it.
The coming years will be fun, both price-wise and WO-wise.
Comfortable quantity of coins may well depend on location, and 20 coins or more seems to be like a western life-style presumption... and so yeah, 20 bitcoin or more right now? versus 20 bitcoin or more in 2029?
So, if a guy currently has the minimum of what you are suggesting to be
20 bitcoin right now, then I would personally project that he should be able to withdraw from that at $8,790 per month with is about $105k per year with 7% per year increases in the dollar amount forever and ever. Of course, if he is withdrawing at a lower rate then his bitcoin will likely continue to grow to provide him greater options in the future (or larger possible withdrawal amounts in the future)...
So, one thing is already being at such 20 BTC or more status, and then another thing would be assessing which timelines of guys could have had reasonably gotten to such a status of 20 BTC or more.
I personally think that even a guy who had done most of his BTC accumulation prior to 2021 could have had reasonably gotten up to 20 BTC, yet it may way would have had cost him $200k in order to get to such status (presuming a cost per coin of around $10k).
Of course, the further back that we go, then the more likely that guys who accumulated most, if not all, of their BTC prior to 2021, they could have had cost per BTC that were quite a bit below $10k per coin.
Remember in March 2020, Mindrust was proclaiming that his average cost per coin for his purported 10 BTC was somewhere in the ballpark of $4,500 per coin... and he was not really atypical of where a relatively aggressive BTC accumulating guy could have had gotten in regards to cost per coin... so when he was complaining about the BTC price going near or to his cost per coin, his cost of coin claims did not really seem atypical for some of the then regular guys in these here parts... so in that sense maybe we could proclaim that many aggressive bitcoin accumulating guys could have had gotten to 20 BTC or more for $100k or less.. not a small amount of money, though within the grasp of guys who were able to focus on getting most of their BTC accumulation accomplished prior to 2021.
[edited out]
It is easy if you have 20 coins at a cost of 50,000 dollars.
it means 1360000-50,000=1,310,000 up. So sell one today at 68k and do nothing until it drops under 40k or goes over 100k.
Isn't it funny (or ironic?) how the first thing that you ever consider in your hypotheticals is "selling" some chunk of coin?
its hard to know what to do if you have 1.5 coins at a cost of 45k
I will agree that the lower your BTC amount, then the more difficult it becomes to sell some of it, and I would also suggest that presuming selling when the price is already in the ballpark of 46% below the ATH (its price in early October - a mere 5 months ago).
you are well up as 102k is way higher than 45k
but you are not in any position to sell you should just add coins.
Perhaps your overall conclusion of continuing to buy, for a person with 1.5-ish coins would be the most logical.
Quantity of coins remains an important factor, yet one of my own current criteria is that any coins that are sold (or tranches as Saylor likes to call them), would not be sold unless they were at least 4 years old and in profits. Alternatively, it could be possible to justify selling some coins that are less than 4 years old if those coins were acquired at a lower price and the remaining bitcoin stash adds up to a coin quantity that is enough or more than enough coins.. which is difficult to imagine how 1.5 coins would fit into such a category, and also it seems to me that anyone accumulating coins since 2021 would have some difficulties getting to overaccumulation status... but yeah, guys have to do their own calculations and make their own assessments of their stash size and how they intend to manage it in regard to their own timeline.. which may or may not be 4 years or longer.. yet it seems to me that any new coins that are accumulated should be accumulated with the intent to hold them at least 4 years. YMMV.
Cuba is being eyed by Trump - we'll be hearing more about it soon...
I guess he has to UP his level of showing himself to be unhinged and/or crazy to help to convince some middle-eastern folks to play ball with him, which may well not work out too well.. for either him or for people who he supposedly represents.
That is what "we" get when putting a convicted criminal psycho-narcissist in a position of relatively high power.
36. Post 66484287 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 21:22:37 CET 2026) in Diretrizes para o uso de IA:
Eu adoro IA, vocês não?
Perguntei quem são os usuários mais relevantes da nossa aba, olha a resposta:
Aqui ela se saiu melhor, mas ainda assim não gostei porque nem me mencionou
Hoje, **sem** um ranking oficial do Bitcointalk para “relevância”, os nomes que mais se destacam na aba local portuguesa parecem ser Adriano, bitmover, TryNinja, joker_josue e sabotag3x, com Pumared, r_victory, rdluffy, junior888 e criptoevangelista logo atrás pela atividade recente visível na board. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
Estou usando um critério prático: papel institucional, tópicos de referência e presença recorrente nas discussões atuais da primeira página. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222475.0)
## Mais centrais
- Adriano é a figura institucional mais forte, porque aparece como moderador de todas as subboards da seção em português: Iniciantes, Economia & Mercado, Mineração, Desenvolvimento & Discussões Técnicas, Altcoins, Brasil e Portugal. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
- bitmover segue como um dos nomes mais importantes porque mantém o tópico “Dados de merit da nossa aba local”, que continua ativo e já soma 951 respostas, funcionando como um fio de referência da comunidade. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
- TryNinja é claramente um dos membros mais visíveis hoje, com vários tópicos ativos na primeira página, como o sorteio da BitList, o tópico da BitList.co e o da CCE.Cash. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
- joker_josue é um dos usuários mais presentes no momento, aparecendo como autor ou último respondente em vários tópicos recentes e também como último postador da subboard de Desenvolvimento & Discussões Técnicas. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
- sabotag3x também entra nesse grupo principal porque abre e movimenta vários tópicos recentes, incluindo discussões sobre Bitrefill, Bitcoin em guerra mundial, ataque à privacidade e outros temas quentes. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
## Nomes fortes
| Usuário | Por que é relevante agora |
|---|---|
| Adriano | Moderador de todas as subboards da seção portuguesa, o que lhe dá peso institucional claro. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20) |
| bitmover | Mantém um dos tópicos de referência da aba, “Dados de merit da nossa aba local”, ainda ativo em março de 2026. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20) |
| TryNinja | Tem múltiplos tópicos ativos na primeira página e também aparece valorizado no “Guia Luso-Brasileiro de postagens no Bitcointalk”. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20) |
| joker_josue | Está muito presente nas respostas recentes e aparece repetidamente como último postador em tópicos ativos. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20) |
| sabotag3x | Abre e sustenta várias discussões recentes; também é citado no guia local entre usuários reconhecidos por meritarem conteúdo. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20) |
| cryptobaboon | É relevante mais como curador de conteúdo, por ser o autor do “Guia Luso-Brasileiro de postagens no Bitcointalk”, um dos tópicos mais vistos da board. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20) |
## Atividade recente
Na fotografia mais imediata da board, junior888, criptoevangelista, Pumared, Paredao, r_victory e rdluffy também aparecem bastante, seja criando tópicos, seja ocupando as posições de último post em discussões recentes. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
Isso sugere que, se a pergunta for “quem mais pesa hoje nas conversas do dia a dia”, esse segundo grupo também merece atenção, especialmente junior888 e criptoevangelista pela frequência visível na página inicial. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
## Leitura prática
Se eu tivesse que resumir em um “top 5 atual” da aba local portuguesa, eu colocaria Adriano, bitmover, TryNinja, joker_josue e sabotag3x. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
Se o foco for menos moderação e mais produção/conversa recente, eu trocaria Adriano por Pumared ou r_victory dependendo do recorte de dias ou semanas. [bitcointalk](
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185668.20)
Quer que eu monte um ranking mais objetivo, por exemplo separando em “institucional”, “mais ativos agora” e “mais úteis historicamente”?
37. Post 66484039 (unedited backup) (by UmerIdrees) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 20:16:49 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
I agree... the same also happened to Chipmixer. Processing any coins may lead to big trouble to the service.
When an exchange refunding high AML coins it is taking no sides in the matter. And it is the best approach for high AML coins.
Freezing coins is always wrong in my opinion. If the exchange doesn't want the coins, or cant process them, just refund them. Taking coins hostage and demanding documents is wrong, nobody has an obligation to handle personal information to anyone.
Also, once the exchange returns those coins that they aren't using, it shows the trustworthiness of the exchange and the service. Refunding the money is the best option as it not only safeguards the interest of the site but also the person who sends the high AML coins gets back his money and doesn't feel that he has been scammed by the site for not refunding him.
These precautions need to be taken by SageSwap if they are to run their service for the long term.
38. Post 66484032 (unedited backup) (by icopress) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 20:14:25 CET 2026) in Test:
@icopress, I noticed the only e-mail service added to bitlist is protonmail, which a famous "private" e-mail service (but there are many people questioning how private it is).
Other services like tutanota (which is a better option imo) and startmail aren't listed yet.
The ranking and evaluation components aren't yet configured for services. We'll do that very soon.
39. Post 66483640 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 18:29:49 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
Freezing coins is always wrong in my opinion. If the exchange doesn't want the coins, or cant process them, just refund them. Taking coins hostage and demanding documents is wrong, nobody has an obligation to handle personal information to anyone.
Legally registered entities, such as fixedfloat, are sometimes unable to offer refunds to users because they have received an official letter from LE stating that a particular address must be frozen/blocked. If they process the transaction or make a refund, they will face legal problems, which is why they often do not do so.
40. Post 66482915 (unedited backup) (by DireWolfM14) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 14:22:37 CET 2026) in First time using Bisq. Suggestions and tips?:
what I need is a card-to-card transfer (Visa Direct, MasterCard MoneySend).
I don't see those payment methods available in Bisq, so it makes me assume they can easily be reversed which might explain why you're seeing high fees when you see these offers in Bisq2.
By the way, here's an interesting observation. These methods are quite convenient, and people are willing to use them (otherwise no one would respond to my offers), but for some reason offers with these payment methods are very uncommon.
Unfortunately, convenience can be expensive.
Cant you use revolut or any European bank that accepts sepa? There are many online banks in europe.
According to google, neither Revolut nor SEPA are available in Russia.
A quick google search shows that Russia has a digital remittance service of their own; SBP (Fast Payment Service,) but at the moment I don't see any buy or sell offers for Rubles in Bisq. SBP is listed as one of the payment types in Bisq, so maybe internetional can be the first to start a trend.
41. Post 66482748 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 13:22:19 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (59) 14252 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (21) 9405 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 4764 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 1730 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 2675 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 10526 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4563 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3379 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 9355 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6152 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 8513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 1814 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 6155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2444 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2027 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 199 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 466 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (9) 6480 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (36) 1855 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2847 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 224980:
cryptodevil (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (5) 254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 13028 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6071 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6613 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 6619 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +8 / =4 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3486 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 9583 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 704 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (26) 4254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3560 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 11264 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11591 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4518 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2589 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 4364 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (66) 20277 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 6285 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2988 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 9284 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 698159:
Jet Cash (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2069 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 1350 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3923 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 448 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1556 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1487 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3639 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1129 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6616 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 4155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 1839 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2214 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 15198 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2192 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3233 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (38) 11830 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1179651:
sheenshane (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1359 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2234 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2028 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 9231 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2473 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3315 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 7292 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 11256 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1668017:
anonymousminer (
Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1397 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 3899 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2608 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 19954 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2478 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 2470 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 2502 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (28) 5454 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 5470 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1528 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 1887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1203 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 823 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1108 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5492 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 7762 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1841 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 9545 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5177 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 9407 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1233 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3245 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 3373825:
paid2 (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3763 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 3373858:
n0nce (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (8) 6016 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 646 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 3486361:
PowerGlove (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6903 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3540187:
apogio (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2385 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +43 / =0 / -0) (
8392 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
878 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (
191 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 3318:
Luke-Jr (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
196 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: neutral) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. Post 66482160 (unedited backup) (by internetional) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 09:03:37 CET 2026) in First time using Bisq. Suggestions and tips?:
The exchange rate is not bad in Bisq. What payment method are you looking for?
Basically, what I need is a card-to-card transfer (Visa Direct, MasterCard MoneySend). Such offers appear rarely, so I usually post an offer myself.
By the way, here's an interesting observation. These methods are quite convenient, and people are willing to use them (otherwise no one would respond to my offers), but for some reason offers with these payment methods are very uncommon.
I also need some specific domestic Russian payment methods. But considering the extremely low popularity of Bisq in Russia, I definitely wouldn't go to Bisq for such exchanges.