bitmover's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned bitmover in the past 7 days

Time for yet another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time a little bit later than usual as I was travelling and its pain in the ass to do these kind of things on laptop screen alone. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards but are part of this overview nevertheless.

Post activity per local board during February 2026

During February, 12919 posts were written across local boards that are part of the overview, which is a noticeable drop compared to January's 13925. Majority of that drop happened on the most active board, Nigerian, whose numbers went down from 4824 in January to 3924 in February. Despite the drop, they are still by far the most active board, followed by Russian and Turkish.

Active members per local board during February 2026

During the above mentioned period, 1335 members wrote at least one post, which is an expected drop compared to January's 1392. Unsurprisingly, majority of the drop happened on the Nigerian board. It would be ineteresting to hear from someone from their local board (maybe from their local sheriff Igebotz?) what has happened there.

Local board members per amount of posts during February 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only one post in their board during February, leader is Indian board with 50%, while at the same time Croatian local board had only 14% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French board with 52%, while Turkish was at the bottom with 36%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Portuguese board with 50% of such members, while French is at the bottom with only 5% of the members that wrote 10+ posts during last month.

Merit shared per local board during February 2026

During February, 7901 merit was shared across local boards which is a big drop compared to January during which 9717 merit was shared. This time noy only Nigerian board is responisble for such a big drop, but basically all the more active and merited boards as well. Despite the drop, I think those are still pretty good numbers.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during February 2026

As it can be seen on the chart, despite the big drop of merit sent, merit per post ratio remained pretty high. Well, at least on the majorify of the boards, while some like Greek, Bengali, Pilipinas and French are still struggling.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during February 2026

During the last month, 535 members sent while 615 members of local boards received merit, which is expectedly a drop compared to January (633 senders, 725 receivers)

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during February 2026

Once again Romanian board remained at the top of this chart, but this time with more realistic (but still very high) 45% merited posts, while Indian and Italian were just behind them. At the same time we have Greek board which is on par with Off Topic and similar boards.

Merit per transaction across local boards during February 2026

And the last in this series of charts, merit per transaction, that shows meriting habits of local boards.

The most active members per local board during February 2026

Last but not the least in this monthly overview, the list of the most active members per local board. mandown from Turkish local has been the most active member with 132 posts, followed by two member from Russian local, Julien_Olynpic with 121 post and klarki with 119 post. GG guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Julien_Olynpic [121]	\|	1. mole0815 [104]	\|	1. mandown [132]	\|	1. gbianchi [63]	\|	1. joker_josue [97]	\|	1. famososMuertos [32]	\|
2. klarki [119]	\|	2. Lakai01 [66]	\|	2. execijutiere [90]	\|	2. Italian Panic [43]	\|	2. TryNinja [38]	\|	2. LUSUBY [32]	\|
3. safar1980 [113]	\|	3. MaxMueller [54]	\|	3. yenerbatmaz [72]	\|	3. fillippone [39]	\|	3. Forsyth Jones [34]	\|	3. Hispo [24]	\|
4. Numeral [102]	\|	4. Real-Duke [51]	\|	4. Hvdv [61]	\|	4. Plutosky [34]	\|	4. alegotardo [33]	\|	4. Don Pedro Dinero [22]	\|
5. xandry [96]	\|	5. Soonandwaite [51]	\|	5. kriminall [60]	\|	5. babo [32]	\|	5. criptoevangelista [33]	\|	5. Porfirii [20]	\|
6. zasad@ [90]	\|	6. cygan [49]	\|	6. Mustang Shelby [57]	\|	6. Ale88 [31]	\|	6. Pumared [30]	\|	6. darxiaomi [15]	\|
7. Alex077 [81]	\|	7. willi9974 [47]	\|	7. Phoenix Anka [56]	\|	7. Paolo.Demidov [29]	\|	7. sabotag3x [27]	\|	7. danadc [13]	\|
8. mak013 [65]	\|	8. Koal-84 [47]	\|	8. MomusReign [52]	\|	8. georgino22222 [20]	\|	8. bitmover [27]	\|	8. Crystal-Trade.org [12]	\|
9. tvplus006 [63]	\|	9. MinoRaiola [47]	\|	9. blomen [51]	\|	9. Ace [15]	\|	9. rdluffy [22]	\|	9. Tete130 [11]	\|
10. internetional [62]	\|	10. Unknown01 [46]	\|	10. lodocus [50]	\|	10. bitcoiner180 [12]	\|	10. mikel_012 [18]	\|	10. btc-marty [10]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [75]	\|	1. rony_btc [14]	\|	1. arwin100 [23]	\|	1. slackovic [48]	\|	1. Jubilee58 [81]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [32]	\|
2. Husna QA [70]	\|	2. winspiral [9]	\|	2. julerz12 [23]	\|	2. katanic97 [36]	\|	2. Floxynice [74]	\|	2. yhiaali3 [26]	\|
3. AakZaki [34]	\|	3. Danydee [8]	\|	3. cryptoaddictchie [23]	\|	3. Daniel91 [29]	\|	3. Africolo [49]	\|	3. khaled0111 [24]	\|
4. taufik123 [33]	\|	4. patrickus [5]	\|	4. Fredomago [21]	\|	4. ovcijisir [25]	\|	4. Cleanshit [48]	\|	4. OmegaStarScream [9]	\|
5. joniboini [31]	\|	5. TryNinja [4]	\|	5. tech30338 [21]	\|	5. cryptofrka [22]	\|	5. Yablee0 [47]	\|	5. RedFlix [7]	\|
6. mu_enrico [31]	\|	6. fpelu [4]	\|	6. bhadz [20]	\|	6. examplens [21]	\|	6. Karl_3000 [45]	\|	6. NotATether [4]	\|
7. masulum [25]	\|	7. oscar2000 [3]	\|	7. xLays [20]	\|	7. Rikafip [21]	\|	7. PremiumcryptoHub [41]	\|	7. GxSTxV [4]	\|
8. Rashlyowl [24]	\|	8. paid2 [3]	\|	8. robelneo [18]	\|	8. Pmalek [18]	\|	8. Crypto_Timothy [41]	\|	8. DireWolfM14 [3]	\|
9. Luzin [23]	\|	9. gaelium [3]	\|	9. coin-investor [18]	\|	9. Trofo [16]	\|	9. Charles-Tim [37]	\|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [3]	\|
10. MAAManda [18]	\|	10. Botchain [3]	\|	10. GreatArkansas [18]	\|	10. dkbit98 [16]	\|	10. Mr Reporter [36]	\|	10. hugeblack [2]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [12]	\|	1. JSRAW [32]	\|	1. cryptosize [36]	\|	1. NeuroticFish [23]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [38]	\|	1. Bd officer [17]	\|
2. pawel7777 [4]	\|	2. Bitcoin Smith [26]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [20]	\|	2. GazetaBitcoin [11]	\|	2. ZAINmalik75 [36]	\|	2. DYING_S0UL [11]	\|
3. TryNinja [4]	\|	3. vivekdhyani1 [22]	\|	3. alani123 [12]	\|	3. Botchain [5]	\|	3. JunaidAzizi [34]	\|	3. Crypto Library [7]	\|
4. kazikbalaganiarz [3]	\|	4. pawanjain [20]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [5]	\|	4. TryNinja [4]	\|	4. MusaPk [20]	\|	4. Shishir99 [7]	\|
5. Judicar [1]	\|	5. TheUltraElite [8]	\|	5. BitcoinsGreece [2]	\|	5. b1ack [3]	\|	5. Rustam Meraj [20]	\|	5. B2Z [3]	\|
6. stwenhao [1]	\|	6. Cointikka [5]	\|	6. whoismeanyway [2]	\|	6. isidor44 [3]	\|	6. HustleZ [18]	\|	6. Hridyansh Labs [2]	\|
7. cryptdar88 [1]	\|	7. henmark [4]	\|	7. WebMonero [2]	\|	7. UsdtBucuresti [2]	\|	7. Faisal2202 [16]	\|	7. Mahiyammahi [2]	\|
	\|	8. IIrik11 [4]	\|	8. bxcxsdfg [1]	\|	8. max2000irc [1]	\|	8. BTC FutureKing [13]	\|	8. Btcloop [1]	\|
	\|	9. M47AK16 [3]	\|		\|	9. othell_rogue [1]	\|	9. Jaweria parveen [13]	\|	9. Comando65 [1]	\|
	\|	10. Rahulkirford [3]	\|		\|	10. Razvan_BTC [1]	\|	10. Publictalk792 [12]	\|	10. Morshedbns [1]	\|

Quote from: B-BossMan on Today at 12:25:08 PM

Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 12:12:29 PM

Quote from: B-BossMan on Today at 11:51:07 AM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:48:19 AM

Winners announced. I didn't get anything. THe 3rd place had 40k sats! I had 5.5 K only

Since the 3rd position had about 40k and you have 5.5k then the third position should be given to you honestly, but did you follow the due process because all the participants were asked to drop thier screenshot of the accumulated SATS balance on Bitz io post in X and then tag the @bitz_casino_en since on 21st of this month. Check here 👇

https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2038736758532170060

B-BossMan, what are you even saying. I don't understand you, I thought it was a sarcasm when you said that the 3rd position should have been given to bitmover, but reading it here again made me realize you are being serious.
What is the relationship between 40k and 5.5k and why should 5.5k be considered over 40K. Is there something you are not telling us or you simply do not understand how the challenge worked?

@Zoomic I understood how it works a little, I was just trying to explain his points, he said he have 5.5k, which I guess he was trying to say 55k, then definitely if it's 55k he should be given the position. My bad, I just noticed it was 5.5k he wrote.....Thanks for your observations.

And congratulations to the winners

You're misunderstood Bitmover's post. He wasn’t claiming he had 55k SATs instead he was just congratulating the winners and comparing his own SATs with that of the 3rd place user. His point was that if 3rd place already had 40k SATs then he didn't even stand a chance to win anything with his 5.5k SATs. The gap is just too much to catch up.

Bitmover with your 5.5k SATs you should be 30th place Grin

... You still ahead of me though. I only managed 1k sats.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:57:41 PM

Nossa 30k?

Eu diria que 50k é possivel mas ja seria um banho de sangue terrivel!! Tambem nao acho provável 50k, mas pode ser..

Também acho 30k muito improvável no curto prazo.. só se o Fed subir os juros lá nos EUA por conta do petróleo.. mas parece que nenhum país está interessado em apoiar o Trump, então logo tudo volta ao normal no Oriente Médio.

O problema é que esse bear market vai longe ainda, igual os outros.. 2027, 2028 surge algum novo FUD gigante como China vs Taiwan que o @criptoevangelista mencionou.

Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 12:12:29 PM

Quote from: B-BossMan on Today at 11:51:07 AM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:48:19 AM

Winners announced. I didn't get anything. THe 3rd place had 40k sats! I had 5.5 K only

https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2038736758532170060

Quote from: B-BossMan on Today at 11:51:07 AM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:48:19 AM

Winners announced. I didn't get anything. THe 3rd place had 40k sats! I had 5.5 K only

https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2038736758532170060

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:48:19 AM

Winners announced. I didn't get anything. THe 3rd place had 40k sats! I had 5.5 K only

https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2038736758532170060

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:48:19 AM

Winners announced. I didn't get anything. THe 3rd place had 40k sats! I had 5.5 K only

https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2038736758532170060

So it was only three winners? I was thinking that, it was going to be more than that. The first winner had up to 100k SATS wow that's a lot though, who knows how long they have been accumulating their SATS. @bitmover I honestly thought that you will be among the winners, but seeing the final results, it just shows that others SATS is significantly higher than yours. But anyways hoping that they will host another contest again and maybe one of us will be among the winners.

Quote from: dwyane36 on Today at 10:48:10 AM

Quote from: iv4n on Today at 08:52:17 AM

And now we can claim the free Sats only if we make a deposit, which I did... But I wonder whether it will be a weekly or a monthly deposit requirement. By the way, at the moment:

There is a weekly requirement to get free Sats. In other words, to gain access to the rewards center, a user must have made at least one deposit in the last 7 days. Regular users might not be too happy about this, but I’m more than sure that such requirements are necessary to combat abusers(bots).

I actually just noticed that too, but I think it's not all the rewards that require deposit before you can gain access to them. And I feel it's either the Tuesday's Loot or Satoshi's Box that requires deposit but I really don't know. I think it would have been better if they clearly show which one requires the deposit, so that people don't get the wrong idea. But I'm not really sure if it will affect regular users though, because I am very sure they make deposit every day.

Quote from: bitmover on March 30, 2026, 11:07:56 PM

Quote from: iv4n on March 30, 2026, 07:41:53 AM

Quote from: Rruchi man on March 29, 2026, 06:23:04 PM

I think just as we talk about avoiding revenge gambling, that is, trying to win back money you lose while gambling by gambling immediately, we should not forget that continuing to gamble just after a win without a sufficient break can lead to loss. Losses, which can claim all that you have won.

This wasn't "revenge gambling", I didn't chase any losses... I simply decided to buy some super bonuses, and that's it. A complete disaster this time, but as we all know, slots & buying bonuses & super bonuses can be tricky as hell. Slots can give a lot, but they can also take a lot more... maybe next time I will have more luck.

I already lost a good amount of money trying to get back my losses.

I once lost 0,03 BTC in a casino (when it was worth like 200 USD). I sent more 0.01 to try to recover it, and lost more 0.01!!

If i just had holded it, it would be worth thousands of dollars today lol

Lots of us experience same like situation, since many of us really want to recover our losses and think that on our next bet we provably gonna hit those big multiplier then that would cover up those losses we get and flip the situation in favor to us. But unfortunate situation really came and lose all those money we deposited for experiencing more losing streak.

Also yeah many provably think about if people just hold their volumes used in gambling before they supposed to get lots of money now, but we cannot control the situation and we don't know if Bitcoin will grow like this and those happenings before is just part of good experience dealing with Bitcoin also with our past gambling activities.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:48:19 AM

Winners announced. I didn't get anything. THe 3rd place had 40k sats! I had 5.5 K only

https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2038736758532170060

Holy smokes with that 100K sats just from the faucet. He dedicated all the claiming hard work for this special occasion. No one will ever knew that a casino will launch a giveaway to boost the claim of their own free faucet without any wager requirements on rewards.

This is how generous Bitz with their promotion. Let me join you on this faucet claim adventure. I will try to gamble mine to increase it rapidly for a chance to beat the top spot.

Quote from: icopress on March 30, 2026, 05:37:08 PM

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 8 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 66,800]} Wink

icopress, doggywin, Jinetics1111, AakZaki, TryNinja, bitmover - Bonus sent!

Welcome!

Code:

SensitiveEyes
Peanutswar

Hi! I understand that this is a small thing, but you didn't count my post in ANN in the spreadsheet. I had 5 posts in week 8, and I still have 5 posts in week 9.

Quote from: SeriouslyGiveaway on March 30, 2026, 03:36:23 AM

It's giveaway so when there is no financial inputs for receiving the giveaway, it becomes more comfortable and people can easily join, then wait for results without any pressure. Just don't keep their hope too high, and simply do their normal activities and wait for giveaway announcement with result like which participants are chosen as giveaway receivers.

Yes, you are right as we should not feels any pressure. If we thinks that we can get the giveaway, we take it but if not, we can skip and waits for the next giveaway. It is easy so we can choose what we thinks that we can get it. But any giveaway will takes people's attention so they will get it and wait for the announcement.

Quote from: Dave1 on March 30, 2026, 07:41:57 AM

I wouldn't say it's difficult, everything is base on luck. So there could be people that are more lucky than anyone. But the thing is that we can participate as long as we can and we shouldn't doubt ourselves that one day maybe we could be that lucky person.

For free sats, yeah why not. We should accumulate as much as we can. For the giveaways, we love this kind of promotions here and we can see that most gamblers really join it as there are no like stress or pressure on our end.

The difficult is compete with all participants as they also want to win and we can only rely on our luck. We can participate on any giveaway that we want but we should know it is better not to hopes too high as we compete with all.

We can accumulate free sats as that is free for all. We can use it as our free investment so that will also attract attention from others. I am sure all of us love giveaway which we don't have to pay. Just feels enjoy joining giveaways and let our luck comes in the right time.

Quote from: bhadz on March 30, 2026, 06:19:58 PM

Although for this one there will be 200 winners that shall receive 50 USDT if chosen. And that's a lot of winners there and bitz chosen to pick more winners than someone who'll win with all of it. I think either of the two are a good giveaway and so, we all wish everyone good luck and also thanks to that reminder that the others might have also forgotten.

From 200 winners, we hopes that we may be one of the winners so we can receive $50. We hopes that the winners will be from here so we can celebrates. It is just waiting for the luck but if we do not win, we can waiting and join the next giveaway. I am sure Bitz.io will releasing more giveaway to attract more people to join.

Quote from: bitmover on March 30, 2026, 08:43:07 PM

When will the winners be selected?

Today is the deadline! I hope to get something Grin

The result will be announces in April 10 as I see in Bitz.io X page so we can wait until that time and hopes you can be one of the winner. I wish many of us will be the winners so that will be a great moment seeing many fellows from here are the winners Grin

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 05:31:07 PM

So many new review services showing up recently!

I think you should add a space for user reviews, like other platforms. You would have your own score and the community score. Like metacritic.

I guess it’s normal. Just like in gambling sites, there are a lot of things being shown, but we’re the ones who decide what to believe. We can’t control what they write, so it’s really up to us to evaluate if it’s something we trust or not. Because whether we like it or not, most of those reviews are biased. The main goal of many of those websites is to monetize once they become popular.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:43:07 PM

Quote from: jcojci on March 22, 2026, 03:41:32 AM

If you already collected free SATS, there is a contest who stack higher will win 200,000 SATS, no wager. The bigger the stack, the better your chances.

The requirement to join is easy, you only need to screenshot of your SATS balance and post it on X + tag @bitz_casino_en.

You can check it on their X post : https://x.com/bitz_casino_en/status/2035393498124632527.

Good luck guys.

When will the winners be selected?

Today is the deadline! I hope to get something Grin

Trust me if I had known something this massive was going on I would have started collecting my SATS long time ago, but anyway I just hope there will be another contest after this one. Anyways good luck to lucky users that will win.

Quote from: Itz-prisigold on Today at 06:31:53 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:33:16 PM

Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the SATS and the real bitcoin you deposit on your own to Bitz going into two different balances that aren't combined into one?
The sats stay as sats in your account. You need to pump them up to at least 30,000 and then you have to convert them to a stablecoin before being allowed to withdraw. The bitcoin you deposit increase your bitcoin amount and remain independent of the sats earned through the rewards center.

You are correct, the SATS from the rewards center and the Bitcoin you deposit are in separate balance. Your SATS just sit there in the SATS balance until you reach the minimum amount which is about 30,000 and then you can convert them to a stablecoin, but I don't really know if you can withdraw your SATS once you convert it to stablecoin or you have to play game with it before you can withdraw. I just recently start collecting my daily SATS. The Bitcoin you deposit is in the main balance and it is not in anyway affected by the rewards. So basically, you can think of these as two separate pots, your SATS grows slowly by collecting daily rewards and your Bitcoin moves based on your deposits and you can withdraw it anytime you want.

Quote

30000 is a lot! I have 5500 and everyone was impressed by how rich I am ! (until they realized it was worth $4)

I was one of the people that thought you have actually made a good amount of money not knowing it wasn't up to $4 Grin. But you've gone a long way though, maybe you might be among one of the winners in the SATS flex challenge.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:43:07 PM

Quote from: jcojci on March 22, 2026, 03:41:32 AM

Good luck guys.

When will the winners be selected?

Today is the deadline! I hope to get something Grin

Quote from: Itz-prisigold on Today at 06:31:53 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:33:16 PM

30000 is a lot! I have 5500 and everyone was impressed by how rich I am ! (until they realized it was worth $4)

I was one of the people that thought you have actually made a good amount of money not knowing it wasn't up to $4 Grin

. But you've gone a long way though, maybe you might be among one of the winners in the SATS flex challenge.

Quote from: sabotag3x on March 13, 2026, 11:34:11 PM

Acertei todas do quiz, sou um maximalista Tongue

--
Por falar nisso, acho que o último vídeo que vi sobre Bitcoin foi no canal do Leta, onde eles estavam conversando sobre o Core v30 e o Knots.. já faz um tempinho.

Quote from: joker_josue on March 20, 2026, 08:06:12 AM

Sim, realmente o site parece ter coisas interessantes.

Faz lembrar o site do bitmover - https://bitcoindata.science/
Talvez dê para ele tirar algumas ideias.
--

Parabéns aos dois, eu até hoje não vi esse quiz, mas é uma boa dinâmica.

Quote from: silencedog on March 23, 2026, 07:32:16 PM

Esse tutorial também é bem bom: https://threedolar.com.br/como-fazer-auto-custodia-bitcoin-criptomoedas/

Eu dei uma lida em alguns tópicos sobre Bitcoin abordados na página, achei a linguagem meio 'conversa de bar', o que deixa a leitura mais descontraída (alguns curtem isso e outros não), eu até que achei legal, tem outras coisas sobre o mercado financeiro tbm, legal.
O blog é seu?

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 8 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 66,800]} Wink

icopress, doggywin, Jinetics1111, AakZaki, TryNinja, bitmover - Bonus sent!

Welcome!

Code:

SensitiveEyes
Peanutswar

Quote from: bitmover on March 29, 2026, 11:29:13 PM

Quote from: tiCeR on March 27, 2026, 09:59:44 PM

Banks wont be needed with CBDC.
Your balance will be directly controlled in the central bank, and the wallet will be the app that will do everything you need.

Banks wont be making custody of your money like they do now.

Of course, the need of banks would become minimal but for CBDCs to work, individuals must first accept to use it and then adopt it. Or it would remain as it is with crypto currencies leading the fore front for digital currency assets.
I also think one of the reasons why CBDCs has not been adopted widely is because of lack of proper policies by the government of any countries using it, that esteem its usage and favor it above fiat currency and crypto currencies.

Quote from: I_Anime on March 28, 2026, 10:15:33 PM

Quote from: PhilosopherKing on March 27, 2026, 10:34:03 PM

Quote from: Mr_Brilliant$ on March 27, 2026, 06:27:12 AM

Yeah for real, most of them are so annoying, they didn’t even come to understand Bitcoin, they just came chasing quick flips and when it did not go their way, boom… they start calling it scam..

Truth is, anything that actually builds wealth takes a lot of time, patience and also discipline. But once greed enters, logic will just disappear.. Can’t be blaming Bitcoin for a mindset problem to be honest..

People that come to bitcoin so they can flip their money for profit have shortterm mind so they cannot last long in bitcoin because of how afraid they will get if they encounter volatility.

Nothing good can come from person trying to fool theirselfs and outwitting the market because of the little gain they want to get. Consistent return only come from long term ongoing investment

The worse is when one is not well equipped with the right knowledge. Rather to be in such position (trading for shortterm profits without solid knowledge), just stick with bitcoin investment (holding for long ), which is quite safer than trading , though it has its own risk (cause there’s nothing like risk free investment), but the risk can be easily managed, especially those that understand how bitcoin investment works , like knowing how to allocate your money when come to investing .

The best way to mitigate risk is with position size, and so choosing an amount that you can afford to lose, whether that is $100 per week, $10 per week or some other amount....

So, surely one of the problems might come if the investment is greatly in profits, and there are temptations to tap into it.

Otherwise for guys who have not even been in bitcoin a whole cycle, there is likely not a lot of profits, and probably a need to just keep buying and to figure out an amount that is able to be put in on a weekly basis and is not either emotionally or financially bothersome.

Quote from: Promocodeudo on March 29, 2026, 12:50:46 PM

Quote from: Futurexxx on March 29, 2026, 07:40:30 AM

Quote from: cxtreenal on March 28, 2026, 03:46:17 PM

I repeat that depending on the increase in physical assets, it may be a good decision to withdraw part of the profit at the end of one or more cycles and increase physical assets.

This is not a wise decision, and we should refrain from doing such now or later in the future because we are still in our accumulation stage, and it's even more unwise to do such if you are a low coiner that is still far behind in his or her accumulation journey, besides do you think that the physical asset you wanted to invest in can be more profitable than bitcoin?
Statistically, in the past ten years, Bitcoin is actually the most profitable asset to invest in out there, so why killing your accumulation drive for something that wouldn't even give you as much revenue as Bitcoin later in the future?
My advice is that you should retrace your step because it's not a wise decision.

Profit withdrawal, profit this and profit that has been the reason why some investors don't concentrate in their accumulating or to even know that they need to give much attention to their Bitcoin accumulation than talking some shit about taking profit, what's one or more cycle as cxtreenal said, just 8years, so he's trying to tell us that 8 years is enough for people to withdraw, so he can advise an investor to accumulate and withdraw profit in those number of years even though they are at their accumulation stage, that's not right, I think that looks like a short term mindset and shouldn't be encourages, Bitcoin investment is not for short term and that should always be in our mind.

Do you want to use an example of a guy who had been investing in bitcoin for 8 years? Let's give it a shot, and try to figure out where such a guy might be right now?

Let' say that we have a guy who was in his early 30s in 2018, so right now he i about 40 years old. He had an income of about $30k per year for the last 8 years, and o he had been guying around $100 per week of bitcoin (17.33% of his income.

Accordingly, in March 2018, he started buying $100 per week, and until now he invested $42k and he has accumulated 2.7 BTC. Perhaps hi initial goal was to be able to stop his work and to withdraw $80k per year.

Right now, 2.7 BTC would ONLY get him right around $14k per year of income, which would be right around $1,200 per month (the time-based sustainable withdrawal tool is not working correctly right now, but the formula right now is to multiply the BTC by the 200-WMA - which is currently right around $59,200 and then to potentially withdraw yearly up to 10% of that amount as long as the BTC price is at least 25% above the 200-WMA.. which is not that case right now). Surely, that is not a bad amount of money, but it is not anywhere near his goal, and if he start to withdraw from his bitcoin early it may well have good chances of slowing him down in his goal.

An alternative way of withdrawing (other than time based) is price based, yet even that is not advisable prior to reaching overaccumulation status, yet even that should be reserved for when the BTC price is going up.. and perhaps some limited withdrawal formulas could be employed as the price is going up, such as withdrawing less than 10% every time the BTC price doubles, yet if the guy is still accumulating, he would be buying out of one hand and selling out of the other, which does not seem a great way of managing bitcoin holding. Here are some ideas on time-based sustainable withdrawal.

Guys can set their goals however they like, yet if they are withdrawing when the price is going down and/or withdrawing way before they are even close to overaccumulation status... they are likely quite undermining their bitcoin holdings, and even if they are losing confidence in bitcoin, they are likely better off to just hold through this period if they are not ready, willing and/or able to continue to buy.. but yeah people can do what they like.. and surely there are a lot of weird things going on with bitcoin and various other macro assets right now based on global power plays and uncertainties.. which also does not seem to be a justification to sell bitcoin, even if a person might be worried about current global happenings.

Quote from: cxtreenal on March 29, 2026, 04:07:58 PM

Quote from: Merit.s on March 28, 2026, 04:09:54 PM

Quote from: cxtreenal on March 28, 2026, 03:46:17 PM

I repeat that depending on the increase in physical assets, it may be a good decision to withdraw part of the profit at the end of one or more cycles and increase physical assets.

Tapping from the profit of your bitcoin investment to buy a physical asset isn't worth it because I believe bitcoin will do better in price in future than any physical asset that you sold part of your bitcoin for.

Instead, of tapping profits from your bitcoin investment why not stop your bitcoin investment and channel your discretionary income into that physical asset. However, we have our own choices to make since it's our funds. It's better to reach 50% amd above of your bitcoin target before diversifying into other asset.

You will gradually reach the stage of overaccumulation after completing two or three cycles of Bitcoin accumulation and at that point it would be fair if you withdraw some of the profits from Bitcoin to increase your physical assets. If someone does not do this, they may have liquidity of assets so their need to get profits from Bitcoin may be very limited.

If some of them want to continue accumulating Bitcoin continuously, they can if they have discretionary income available. But if you have the mental preparation that you will only accumulate wealth but not consume it, it may be a different matter. No one can predict the future value of Bitcoin. No one has the ability to predict where the value of Bitcoin will go in 10 years. Be self-critical in investing and make realistic decisions and accumulate Bitcoin through discretionary income and DCA method. You need to remember this important point that your long term attitude towards Bitcoin investment depends on the growth of physical assets in the future.

Even my other example above, there is a presumption of 17.3% investment over 2 cycles (8 years) which may well be quite a bit more aggressive than most people are able to accomplish.. many people struggle to consistently invest 10% of their income, and if they are not consistently accumulating (and also at the same time, "taking profits" from time to time, they may well undermine whatever progress that they might have had made when they had been accumulating in earlier times.

So, getting to a point of comfort in bitcoin is likely a product of both how much BTC has been accumulated and also the extent to which the bitcoin price ends up appreciating, which is not guaranteed (as you mentioned). A guy can choose his level of aggressiveness whether 5%, 12%, 17% or some other amount, but then if he is taking money out of his bitcoin investment when he probably should be putting money in, then the amount of his bitcoin accumulation may well would have had ended up going way lower, and it tends to take a real long time to build up a bitcoin investment portfolio, whether 2 or 3 cycles or longer for some who might be even more limited in how much bitcoin they are able to buy on a regular basis. Sometimes it would be better for guys to invest into bitcoin at lower percentage amounts, so that they don't feel drawn towards tapping into their bitcoin at seemingly wrong (and premature) times.

There is nothing that we can really do if guys end up making mistakes and over doing their investment into bitcoin when they thought that they were investing within their tolerance levels. Each of us likely has a responsibility to invest in such a way that we don't end up feeling that we have to change our investment approach based no our own feelings of prematurely "taking out profits" that may well have good chances of becoming regrets down the road.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (59) 14343 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (21) 9481 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4846 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1731 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2742 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4580 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9434 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 123824: albon (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1822 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6183 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2044 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 199 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (9) 6509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (36) 1879 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +10 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 13138 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6668 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9673 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3573 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 11273 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11666 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4395 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (66) 20433 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6307 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2075 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1363 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 449 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1606 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3682 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1139 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6624 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4161 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1872 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2223 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 15276 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3259 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +80 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (38) 11974 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1373 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2243 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2034 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 9300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2485 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7333 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 11286 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1412 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4002 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2608 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 20135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 2473 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 5477 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 5546 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1888 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1245 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5504 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 7808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1860 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5226 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9484 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1240 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3285 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 3373825: paid2 (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3763 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3373858: n0nce (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (8) 6057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6987 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2394 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8437 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2676: casascius (Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Weekly update (2026-03-20_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1773972760 1 5577863.msg66526846 3532301 2775483
1773971767 1 5567401.msg66526400 2434463 314792
1773968739 1 5577857.msg66526533 2168312 2003859
1773967628 1 5486271.msg66525149 932931 65636
1773967612 1 5486271.msg66525143 932931 3547969
1773966920 5 178336.msg66527534 198573 3736360
1773966853 3 5476162.msg66525919 1554927 941526
1773966780 1 5573796.msg66384028 1593137 3704403
1773964885 1 5576349.msg66471801 64507 459836
1773964217 1 5438071.msg66527382 3335277 1862043
1773963966 1 5573796.msg66520341 3704403 85033
1773963774 1 5545813.msg66523844 1856852 1265260
1773963658 2 5577699.msg66521568 3322606 459836
1773962815 1 5577857.msg66526533 1012655 2003859
1773961534 2 5572456.msg66526494 3322606 1137579
1773960508 1 5576901.msg66523892 3704193 140584
1773960256 1 178336.msg66526863 198573 18321
1773960226 5 178336.msg66526820 198573 216310
1773960171 1 178336.msg66525444 120694 1067333
1773959915 2 5457016.msg66526331 1554927 3557382
1773959863 1 5132720.msg66525197 3526976 3733747
1773959616 1 5576901.msg66490447 3704193 3701436
1773959349 3 5577802.msg66527148 317618 3322606
1773959244 1 5523596.msg66527115 1593137 2004043
1773959038 2 5576825.msg66488542 3558380 3567660
1773958130 1 5577838.msg66525609 2003859 1068464
1773958124 1 5577557.msg66516751 30747 113670
1773957837 1 5438071.msg66526650 153149 1099980
1773957802 1 5576596.msg66480326 1051073 26945
1773957789 1 5576596.msg66514420 1051073 317618
1773956921 1 5576901.msg66490447 3521023 3701436
1773956827 4 5560299.msg66527060 379487 926962
1773956625 1 5572483.msg66526782 85033 11425
1773956563 1 5577785.msg66526985 33156 2003859
1773955984 3 5576714.msg66526960 317618 724243
1773955798 1 5576518.msg66526991 1856852 1410401
1773955647 2 5572483.msg66526782 300014 11425
1773954286 1 5577855.msg66526479 941526 3654063
1773953693 3 140078.msg1494788 317618 3318
1773953450 1 5577692.msg66526570 2825075 946901
1773953304 1 5577855.msg66526479 3575638 3654063
1773953058 1 5523788.msg64952697 3529017 3539629
1773953045 1 5572483.msg66526782 3704391 11425
1773952901 1 5572483.msg66521203 317618 844914
1773952539 1 178336.msg66526226 430390 198573
1773952348 1 5208530.msg66522268 1410401 3442679
1773952204 3 5522234.msg66526689 379487 1852120
1773952176 3 5268108.msg66526780 379487 1852120
1773951834 1 1799823.msg66525838 1280964 988039
1773951731 1 5577739.msg66522386 1410401 3751038
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (55 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2144 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 20 Mar 2026 03:12:40 AM CET, SeriouslyGiveaway (history) sent 1 Merit to BlackHatCoiner (history) for Forget selfies and passports – crypto should be private.
On Fri 20 Mar 2026 02:56:07 AM CET, FinneysTrueVision (history) sent 1 Merit to examplens (history) for Re: 🔸 SageSwap.io - Fast Crypto Swap 🔸 Escrow $2000 🔸 NO KYC/AML!.
On Fri 20 Mar 2026 02:05:39 AM CET, yhiaali3 (history) sent 1 Merit to DireWolfM14 (history) for عيد مبارك.
On Fri 20 Mar 2026 01:47:08 AM CET, Ale88 (history) sent 1 Merit to babo (history) for Re: BITCOIN PUMP 360°.
On Fri 20 Mar 2026 01:46:52 AM CET, Ale88 (history) sent 1 Merit to Italian Panic (history) for Re: BITCOIN PUMP 360°.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (583 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8437 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 884 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3750567: freddy_mujik (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3750739: Aventas (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3750779: Bitsolo.me (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3751038: sats2usd (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3751069: katzamit99 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3747322: Ngozi26
3747467: Dollartree
3747543: jinx_22
3747640: Mark00101
3747685: oxynaz
3747701: JonasKernDE
3747712: Mr intelligence
3747726: Spicoli
3747820: statumx
3747822: Amaro958
3747833: Chifather247
3747903: needsumhelp
3747917: billy.grabow
3747918: btchelp.io
3748112: ranswar
3748386: martschlo
3748434: alkalineph13
3748444: Skizakas
3748484: GemUtxo
3748490: luthen
3748492: CryptoLogixBot
3748579: Der_Gegenwert
3748655: deX001
3748702: Batractoxin
3748768: ghoulMAX
3748978: Meggie Leen
3749023: JetSeason
3749052: cezar1
3749110: PocketAurora
3749153: yowbow
3749316: Carl_DKJ
3749438: Zagal
3749590: Rex1971
3749597: Allicedreim123
3749642: Julienbxl
3749650: Wexler3K
3749790: Strixc2
3749819: Jzbond65
3749913: BowClawblaw
3749923: BobClawblaw
3749937: ostap1706
3749956: funinfo
3750034: (BTC)
3750208: BambooSynergy
3750258: burnchat
3750567: freddy_mujik
3750739: Aventas
3750779: Bitsolo.me
3751038: sats2usd
3751069: katzamit99

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8437
4:0:884
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14338:14343
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:301
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1484
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3747322:0:1
3747467:0:4
3747543:0:7
3747640:0:2
3747685:0:1
3747701:0:10
3747712:0:1
3747726:0:1
3747820:0:3
3747822:0:7
3747833:0:2
3747903:0:1
3747917:0:2
3747918:0:1
3748112:0:1
3748386:0:3
3748434:0:1
3748444:0:1
3748484:0:16
3748490:0:7
3748492:0:1
3748579:0:2
3748655:0:1
3748702:0:1
3748768:0:1
3748978:0:4
3749023:0:1
3749052:0:2
3749110:0:2
3749153:0:1
3749316:0:1
3749438:0:3
3749590:0:9
3749597:0:7
3749642:0:1
3749650:0:1
3749790:0:1
3749819:0:1
3749913:0:2
3749923:0:4
3749937:0:1
3749956:0:1
3750034:3:6
3750208:0:1
3750258:0:1
3750567:0:1
3750739:0:2
3750779:0:1
3751038:0:1
3751069:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51117
Sample

Code:

1. 20433 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1104 unique users in 11803 transactions
2. 20135 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 745 unique users in 11045 transactions
3. 18887 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9984 transactions
4. 15276 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 478 unique users in 8802 transactions
5. 14343 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1223 unique users in 5149 transactions
6. 13138 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 713 unique users in 8751 transactions
7. 11974 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 580 unique users in 4579 transactions
8. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
9. 11666 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 490 unique users in 6461 transactions
10. 11286 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6451 transactions
11. 11273 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6556 transactions
12. 11036 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 505 unique users in 5735 transactions
13. 10651 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 580 unique users in 6101 transactions
14. 9895 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 330 unique users in 5084 transactions
15. 9673 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 640 unique users in 5252 transactions
16. 9577 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 525 unique users in 4444 transactions
17. 9484 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 455 unique users in 4745 transactions
18. 9481 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 335 unique users in 3413 transactions
19. 9434 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 436 unique users in 5165 transactions
20. 9411 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 539 unique users in 4268 transactions
21. 9300 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 391 unique users in 3299 transactions
22. 8847 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 537 unique users in 4783 transactions
23. 8580 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 453 unique users in 5089 transactions
24. 8542 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 569 unique users in 5037 transactions
25. 8527 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4849 transactions
26. 8505 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 403 unique users in 4419 transactions
27. 8437 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 406 unique users in 899 transactions
28. 7808 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 456 unique users in 4317 transactions
29. 7569 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4117 transactions
30. 7333 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 581 unique users in 4367 transactions
31. 7139 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 404 unique users in 3646 transactions
32. 6987 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 230 unique users in 1795 transactions
33. 6668 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 276 unique users in 3017 transactions
34. 6654 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 375 unique users in 3355 transactions
35. 6624 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 387 unique users in 3616 transactions
36. 6608 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 940 unique users in 4280 transactions
37. 6593 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 198 unique users in 3835 transactions
38. 6509 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 482 unique users in 3613 transactions
39. 6392 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3663 transactions
40. 6307 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 624 unique users in 3544 transactions
41. 6277 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 418 unique users in 3655 transactions
42. 6246 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 524 unique users in 3641 transactions
43. 6224 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 334 unique users in 2949 transactions
44. 6183 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 220 unique users in 3614 transactions
45. 6170 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 415 unique users in 3379 transactions
46. 6117 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 458 unique users in 3429 transactions
47. 6057 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 195 unique users in 2634 transactions
48. 5973 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 204 unique users in 3449 transactions
49. 5546 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 386 unique users in 2619 transactions
50. 5504 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 415 unique users in 2694 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51068. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51069. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51070. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51071. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51072. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51073. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51074. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51075. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51076. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51077. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51078. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51079. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51080. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51081. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51082. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51083. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51084. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51085. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51086. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51087. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51088. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51089. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51090. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51091. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51092. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51093. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51094. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51095. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51096. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51097. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51098. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51099. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51100. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51101. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51102. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51103. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51104. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51105. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51106. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51107. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51108. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51109. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51110. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51111. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51112. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51113. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51114. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51115. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51116. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51117. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26581
Sample

Code:

1. 72704 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 899 unique users in 12669 transactions
2. 67779 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2197 unique users in 29299 transactions
3. 66496 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3321 unique users in 17611 transactions
4. 58875 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3583 unique users in 56672 transactions
5. 58244 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4612 unique users in 33355 transactions
6. 49956 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3678 unique users in 34589 transactions
7. 43594 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2834 unique users in 15394 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38205 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2961 unique users in 30992 transactions
10. 37586 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2515 unique users in 13973 transactions
11. 34382 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1581 unique users in 13861 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 32109 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1472 unique users in 10319 transactions
14. 30164 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2105 unique users in 10611 transactions
15. 28591 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1431 unique users in 7523 transactions
16. 28007 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1685 unique users in 6609 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 23572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6457 transactions
20. 22991 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1377 unique users in 9491 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 17422 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1721 unique users in 3942 transactions
23. 16159 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 745 unique users in 5975 transactions
24. 16119 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1976 unique users in 6543 transactions
25. 15856 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1722 unique users in 7355 transactions
26. 15665 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 535 unique users in 7365 transactions
27. 15366 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1172 unique users in 9030 transactions
28. 15197 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5473 transactions
29. 14420 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1299 unique users in 8196 transactions
30. 14338 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1103 unique users in 1754 transactions
31. 13999 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1663 unique users in 7314 transactions
32. 13291 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3606 transactions
33. 13181 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3005 unique users in 7031 transactions
34. 13080 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1334 unique users in 7310 transactions
35. 13076 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1303 unique users in 5844 transactions
36. 12982 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1132 unique users in 7930 transactions
37. 12851 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 824 unique users in 6092 transactions
38. 12796 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 827 unique users in 4214 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11306 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1158 unique users in 6246 transactions
41. 10531 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 545 unique users in 3951 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8251 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1041 unique users in 3587 transactions
45. 8202 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 753 unique users in 7188 transactions
46. 8089 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 329 unique users in 3303 transactions
47. 8056 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 574 unique users in 6983 transactions
48. 7930 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 945 unique users in 3473 transactions
49. 7554 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 510 unique users in 5980 transactions
50. 7133 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 517 unique users in 4042 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26532. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26533. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26534. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26535. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26536. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26537. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26538. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26539. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26540. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26541. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26542. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26543. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26544. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26545. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26546. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26547. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26548. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26549. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26550. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26551. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26552. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26553. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26554. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26555. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26556. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26557. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26558. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26559. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26560. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26561. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26562. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26563. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26564. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26565. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26566. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26567. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26568. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26569. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26570. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26571. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26572. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26573. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26574. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26575. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26576. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26577. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26578. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26579. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26580. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26581. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 327541 (14.36%)
Tuesday 326862 (14.33%)
Wednesday 326432 (14.31%)
Thursday 347508 (15.23%)
Friday 345487 (15.14%)
Saturday 301456 (13.21%)
Sunday 305278 (13.38%)
Total: 2280564

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions\

Quote from: fillippone on Today at 08:56:17 PM

Quote from: bitmover on March 26, 2026, 05:46:39 PM

Quote from: Oshosondy on March 25, 2026, 11:20:05 PM

CBDC might even weaken banks
You dont need a bank account to use CBDC.

I dont think developed countries will adopt CBDC soon, specially because they weaken banks and this isnt going to make any good to those societies imo.

This.
In Europe nobody wants the CBDC, at least in its retail form, as it would displace the banks.
Not the retail that would see this as an Orwellian instrument from the government.
Not the banks, that would seeetheir deposits tdrained.
Not even sure what the ECB is trying to accomplish with that.

But isn't there a chance that the CBDC architecture requires banks to be involved and restrict or prohibit anyone else from developing online banking accounts / wallets? That is what least what I suspected, involve the banks like it is today and the users have to download an app that is per se connecting banks with each other.

If it ever comes, it will not be to improve user experience and privacy. I think it is mainly to have maximum surveillance possibilities and options like freezing accounts entirely even when there is only suspicion of any crime like tax evasion. Or bank accounts could be frozen from people they can't stand.

Nonetheless, bitcoin itself takes away options to some degree like freezing accounts as people could just use a decentralized currency. WOuldn't CBDC be most effective from the perspective of the government if it goes hand in hand with cash abolition?

Quote from: bitmover on March 26, 2026, 05:46:39 PM

Quote from: Oshosondy on March 25, 2026, 11:20:05 PM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:22:09 AM

Changelly probably is also highly regulated, making the partnership safe considering present and future regulations...

Based on the available data, I don't think their referral system is attractive.

Quote

You receive 50% of Changelly's revenue (which is 0.25% of the total transaction).

50% of the total transaction (0.25% of the total transaction) is a small percentage and comparable to many referral programs.

They may have special deals with higher fees.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:22:09 AM

Changelly probably is also highly regulated, making the partnership safe considering present and future regulations...

They have a very bad reputation here.

Quote from: bitmover on March 23, 2026, 11:50:18 PM

Hey Zenland!

Sorry for the late response

I received my contract as a PDF in google drive.
It has a link that said "visit the link or scan qr code" to accept the escrow. I did it, but it asked me to connect my wallet (already connected as you can see below)

Am i missing anything? I also verified the PDF, but couldn't accept it.

I am using brave browser.

This was due to a UI issue on our side - you had connected the wrong wallet, and the interface didn’t clearly indicate that. We’ve now fixed this and added a proper warning:

Quote from: bitmover on March 23, 2026, 11:50:18 PM

I got the error. I tried to connect with Zenland wallet and it worked. It didnt work with my web3 wallet (metamask, phantom..)

Everything working. I just had to change to my external wallet to approve the transaction.

After transaction approved, I got the error

Quote

Operation failed: Pimlico bundler RPC error: {'message': 'maxPriorityFeePerGas must be at least 5697874 (current maxPriorityFeePerGas: 4675000) - use pimlico_getUserOperationGasPrice to get the current gas price', 'code': -32602}

I tried again, and it worked.

The problem is that the fee increased from 0.33 to 0.45. The error message wasn't clear, maybe you can improve that.

Something like "fee changed. Try again with a higher fee"

Thank you @bitmover - the funds have now been released. Don’t forget to add the custom token in your wallet to see the 10 USDT and transfer it out if needed.

USDT (Ethereum) contract: 0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206994597c13d831ec7

Regarding the fee error - this was an issue on the Pimlico bundler side. We’ve already reported it, and it has now been fixed.

Also, it would really help if you could clarify what exactly failed with MetaMask - were you using the MetaMask extension inside Brave?

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:20:05 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2026, 02:05:25 PM

At the same time, I wouldn't mind being able to show a 7% increase each year in the dollar amount that is withdrawn in the simulator (by using some kind of an additional setting that allows for annual increase in the withdrawal amount - which makes more sense, to me, when it is measured from dollars rather than from BTC), even though that might be complicated to add such a feature to the simulator portion of the tool.

It is doable.
This 7% annual increase would be to compensate inflation? I think that is too aggressive, I think 3-4% would be more factual.

I was thinking about it as as a user-settable parameter that would be able to be placed in the simulator - so maybe it could range anywhere between 0% and 10% and it would just end up reflecting that users might feel that they need to give themselves an annual cost of living increase - and surely historically it might have had been closer to 3% (perhaps), yet since 2020, it may well be the case that even 7% might be conservative - yet of course, for sure, we likely realize that increases in the costs of goods/services is not spread out equally accross all products/services.. which would be further justification for the user to put in his own estimation of numbers. It also could reflect that individuals would prefer to get a raise each year that is guaranteed (since they set it for themselves) that they would not have had been likely to have been getting through their historical work.

I am nearly 100% positive that historically sustainable withdrawal increases in the withdrawal amounts would have had been supportable with increases in the cost of living, even north of 10% - and of course, we cannot know for sure about the future, even though part of the reason that I like to pay attention to when BTC prices are at least 25% above the 200-WMA, is that it seems likely to me that if BTC is not going to continue to stay at least 25% above the 200-WMA, then we would likely be witnessing a sign that we might need to be careful in terms of giving ourself an annual raise in our withdrawal amount (presuming that we are withdrawing monthly-ish, we could potentially make our adjustment financially and/or psychologically in advance).

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:20:05 AM

But I could add an input button called "Inflation per year" or something like that, and it would increase the anual inflation rate (which the user inputted) each month in the withdrawal ( divided by 12 ofc)

I think that the term "inflation" is ambiguous (it has various meanings), and so I would prefer it to be called something like "annual cost of living increase" - which may well be more of a layman's description that would be more understandable.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:20:05 AM

For example, if a user add 7% inflation it would add 0.565% each month to the withdrawals.

Did I get it correclty?

I was thinking about adding the adjustment annually, but perhaps from a programing perspective, it makes more sense that it would be added whenever the proposed (simulated) withdrawals are made, and in the case of the simulator, we had already presumed withdrawals to be happening twice a month on the 8th and the 22nd.. so I calculate for t7% that would be 7% ÷ 24 = 0.29167% - Of course the tool would figure out the amount based on whatever percentage had been placed in the user input field that would ONLY be in the simulator area.. perhaps based on 0.25% increments?...

Viram que curioso?
Divulgaram que o Lula tem chances de perder pra um Bolsonaro novamente e aí o @Paredao voltou após mais um hiato de 7-10 dias.

Quote from: Paredao on Today at 01:12:53 AM

Por acaso, você teve algum parente que morreu na Pandemia, ou por consequência dela ?

Eu perdi, mas foi por ignorância da pessoa, infelizmente.
Mas, conheço muito mais pessoas bem próxima que precisaram fechar comércio de anos ou que foram pra rua e nunca mais conseguiram se recuperar ao que tinham antes por causa das restrições descabidas que vieram depois.

Enfim, tenho a certeza que desde que Lula assumiu a presidência, estamos vivendo muito pior do que antes (obviamente, sem considerar o período da pandemia), estamos comendo pior e estamos pagando muuuito mais imposto.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:01:54 AM

Mas acho que tanto a esquerda quanto a direita tinham nomes melhores pra oferecer.

Sim, poderiam ser citados vários, a questão é quem aceita ficar de rabo preso para ter o privilégio de concorrer à previdência pelos seus partidos.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:09:15 AM

They use Boltz only for LN, but their swaps to USDT are made in a changelly and sideswift.

I didn't think they would resort to options like Changelly, given all the problems and complaints associated with Changelly, why do services continue to use it to process their transactions?

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:01:54 AM

[...]

Por acaso, você teve algum parente que morreu na Pandemia, ou por consequência dela ?

It looks like you (OgNasty) deleted your post while I was responding to it.. Who would-a-thunk that you might have had wanted to rethink your response?

Quote from: OgNasty on March 26, 2026, 10:24:56 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2026, 10:07:10 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on March 26, 2026, 08:36:52 PM

Read this thread and tell me who it reminds you of. Cheesy

Going broke and trying to frame me as a scammer because I hurt your feelings has become an age old tradition here at bitcointalk.

You figure out some way to to make any topic about you and how you are so much greater than anyone else...

I'm recounting historical facts from this website as they pertain to the discussion at hand, including similarities between idiots 12 years ago and idiots now. Maybe some people aren't as familiar with the stories of users from 12+ years ago. If you think those facts make me, "greater than anyone else" I fail to see how that is on me. I'm sorry that you have never done anything in the Bitcoin community but be a leech and you get jealous when actual contributors here are involved in historical discussion. When are you selling 4% of your stack this year to survive so I can buy it all?

I have a total of 3 accounts that are mostly managed by other people who are mostly allowed to exercise their own discretion within some of the parameters that I had set (using my bitcoin) that are authorized to sell 4% annualized and authorized to sell every month within the formulas that are associated with the sustainable withdrawal website, so monthly would be about 0.33% ... Two of the accounts had been active since about September 2022 - and then the remaining account has been active as of late 2024. You can see what a hypothetical scenario of an account from this post in my sustainable withdrawal thread. Those are not the actual numbers of the thread, even though they started out with 21 BTC in each of those hypothetical accounts.

One account tends to send to various sub accounts each month (and I had said use or lose in regards to the authorized amounts for each month.. which causes an incentive to spend within that month), and I am not sure the extent to which those sub accounts end up selling their BTC to put them on the market... The recipients are free to do what they want including selling or holding, yet as far as informal reports that I got back, perhaps only less than half of recipient account actually sell decent portions of the BTC after receipt.

A second account is sporadic in the quantity of BTC that is being sold and many months seems to just move the BTC from one account and to another and keeps a lot of the BTC in the other account... but yeah every once in a while that account sells some of the BTC - yet I think that there is internal accounting going on with that account so that fiat is being used in other places and mostly the BTC don't end up getting sold (as I had intended the BTC to be sold, but other people have their own idea about what they want to do in term of their own accounting).

The administrator of the third account seems to not know what to do with the BTC that is authorized, even though the quantity of coins is quite a bit smaller than the first two accounts... So it seem to me that the coins in that third account have not been moving from that third account..

I personally believe that once bitcoin holdings reach overaccumulation status, then those bitcoin holdings could support up to a 10% sustainable withdrawal rate based on the formulas and the 200-WMA valuations that are used for measuring authorized withdrawal amounts, yet of course, the formulas have reductions in the amounts if the BTC price is below 25% above the 200-WMA and they allow for extra (advanced months) withdrawals once the BTC price is at least 33% above the 200-WMA.

You can see the formulas in the description portion of the sustainable withdrawal tool, looking like this:
>>>>>>When the BTC spot price is at least 25% above the 200-week moving average, then at least 1 month's withdrawal will be authorized; however,

A) if the BTC spot price is between 10% and 25% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for only 90% of the current month's limit.
B. if the BTC spot price is between 0% and 10% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for only 85% of the current month's limit.
C. if the BTC spot price is between 0% and 20% below the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for only 70% of the current month's limit.
D. if the BTC spot price is between 20% and 30% below the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for only 50% of the current month's limit.
E. if the BTC spot price is greater than 30% and 35% below the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for only 40% of the current month's limit.
F. if the BTC spot price is greater than 35% below the 200-week moving average, then you will be not be authorized to withdraw any BTC from the budget.
•(Authorized) Month Withdrawal limit (USD)

This output is calculated based on BTC stash size * Annual withdrawal / 12 (* USD Spot price). Since the BTC spot price is continuing to change, if the monthly withdrawal is not accomplished all at one time, it is best to refer to the BTC authorized monthly withdrawal amount to stay within limits.

•Advanced Withdrawal (No. Months)

This output is calculated based on if the BTC spot price is higher than the 200 WMA. Accordingly:

A. if the BTC spot price is between 33% and 66% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + an additional month.
B. if the BTC spot price is between 66% and 100% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 3 additional months.
C. if the BTC spot price is between 100% and 200% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 5 additional months.
D. if the BTC spot price is between 200% and 400% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 11 additional months.
E. if the BTC spot price is between 400% and 650% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 23 additional months.
F. if the BTC spot price is between 650% and 900% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 35 additional months.
G. if the BTC spot price is between 900% and 1,400% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 47 additional months.
H. if the BTC spot price is greater than 1,400% above the 200-week moving average, then you will be authorized to withdraw for the current month + 59 additional months.<<<<

I will concede from my own attempts to practice time-based sustainable withdrawal, there have been compliance issue related to three accounts that I had authorized to deploy such withdrawal methods, and I suppose theoretically, I am also authorized to withdraw within those time-based sustainable withdrawal parameters in the event that I come accross any ways that I might want to spend BTC (whether monthly or otherwise), yet since about late 2015, I have been mostly just using funds generated from BTC within price-based sustainable withdrawal, and I have even disclosed that within price-based sustainable withdrawal I have been quite whimpy in my sales, since I have theoretically considered possible sales of up to 10% of the BTC for every time that the BTC price doubles, and maybe I was following something close to that in my earlier years of trying to deploy it, yet little by little the amounts have gravitated downwardly, so perhaps now I might be surprised if I were to sell 3% or even 2% for every doubling of the BTC price.

Quote from: OgNasty on March 26, 2026, 10:24:56 PM

Also, how is your selling BTC every single year instead of providing some value to society to earn an income better than the people spending BTC on a new vehicle that you criticize?

My selling bitcoin every single year has not been too much of a success, even though ever since around early 2019, I had pretty much authorized myself to figure out ways to sell various quantities of BTC so long as the BTC price was at least higher than $5k, yet I likely was mostly following price-based sustainable withdrawal practices (aka sales) rather than time-based sustainable withdrawals... even though granted, I more likely did not work out the formulas for how to carry out time-based sustainable withdrawal in 2022. I probably should be attempting to put more of the time-based sustainable withdrawal into practice, especially since the numbers continue to be so great for sustainably withdrawing from bitcoin, and even my sub accounts that are kind of doing such time-based sustainable withdrawal at a 4% rather than 10% rate, are largely showing that there are ways of making such time-based sustainable withdrawal work if any of the participants (even including myself) might get more serious about regularly selling the BTC that is authorized to be sold.

In the end, some of these ongoing selling matters tend to be easier said than done, since I don't seem to be like you in my excitement to get into dollar, and unlike you, I don't tend to get so excited to be getting into dollars and proclaiming myself to be a bitcoin advocate while getting into dollars... Although, I will say that you do seem to waffle around quite a bit in your own story.. and at some point (not very long ago), you had even said that you were looking at other investments (wasn't it AI-related?), instead of getting back into bitcoin from the supposed dollars that you had supposedly generated from your supposed bitcoin sale(s)..

Quote from: bitmover on March 16, 2026, 02:49:20 PM

I agree that it is unusual.
How do they make money? Does anyone know? I would like to understand better their business model

I think by now you received some of the answers. Here is what the man behind the casino also had to say;

Quote from: Monarch- on November 10, 2025, 05:34:02 PM

We'll make enough money from slots in the long run. Also, we got extremely deep pockets due to running CSGOEmpire for 10 years.

So it's more of a long term initiative. The numbers have been steadily growing over the past weeks (I mean the online folks). Though it does not directly translate to the number of people playing, but it's a good sign.

Quote from: OgNasty on Today at 06:38:17 PM

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on Today at 06:15:46 PM

Quote from: El duderino_ on Today at 07:49:02 AM

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on Today at 04:57:44 AM

Re. buying a car with BTC.
YOLO supporters will disagree, but buying a car with BTC makes sense only if the BTC used is a tiny percentage of your total BTC stash, like 5% or less, and I'm being generous. Spending something like half of your stash to buy a ton of metal on wheels is a total waste of BTC and a certain way to lose your sanity when BTC moons.

5% actually is a lot imo to spend on a vehicle...
Also depends a bit if its only a luxury expensive one or a really necessarily one...
But still 5% is a lot for a car in terms of BTC holdings

Yes, I agree, 5% is really a lot... I initially wrote 1%, but then I thought it may be too little for a luxury car, say $100k, so changed it to 5%.

That's the "problem" with BTC. It's too precious to spend on ~~petty things like cars~~ almost anything really...

It is all relative when you speak in percentages. One man’s 5% is a nuclear powered submarine, while another’s may be a 1996 Honda Accord. There are also considerations like if the vehicle is needed for work or transport, how much time you spend in it, and other possible advantages (maybe you need a car that drives itself or can power your home). Best to not worry about someone else’s vehicle unless it is breaking down and you want to help them.

I am on-board with the idea that everyone is different, and surely it would make a difference if a guy is still in his accumulation stage or if he might already have some authorization for being able to sell since he might have had already reached a status of having enough or more than enough bitcoin.. ...

Maybe we were also assuming that the guy might completely pay for the car outright, yet it might be different if he is spreading the payment over 3-6 years, depending on the available loan terms and even the percentage of the loan.... Sometimes car manufacturers can have 1% to 5% on their loans, yet it is likely that they might not be willing to negotiate the price as much if they are otherwise giving a decently good interest rate on their loan.

Sometimes, I consider the extent to which a guy might be above his fuck you status income to be totally discretionary in regards to being able to use such extra money for whatever reason that he wants.

So for example if a guy has an income level of $80k per year, then right now, he needs to have at least 15.1 BTC.. so then he could buy the car within the income that he already has, yet I personally consider that he could also buy the car with whatever extra bitcoin that he might have. So, maybe if the guy has 20 BTC, then he would have 4.9 BTC to do whatever he would like to do with... and so part of the rationale is that his 15.1 BTC is enough or more than enough BTC for him to carry out his targeted standard of living (which, in this example, is $80k per year plus a 7% increase each year based on the dollar value).

It could also be the case that a guy does not consider his 15.1 BTC to be enough unles it is at least 30% higher than his withdrawal rate, so, then again that would put him at 20 BTC as the minimum target size of his stash, so then if he has more than 20 BTC, then any amount of BTC above the 20 BTC would be considered excess and within his ability to spend, since his already existing stash of 20 BTC upports his then target withdrawal rate.

Quote from: xhomerx10 on Today at 07:18:02 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on Today at 06:33:02 PM

So we no longer "when lambo"?

Initially I think people thought of bitcoin as a windfall and so the "when Lambo" was a flex. Then we grew up and realized what we were really after was "fuck you" money and "when Lambo" could actually derail that longer term dream.
Thank you Peter Saddington (bought Lambo at $5600 per coin; generational wealth achievement remains locked) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGJ_q_mtMFc

Listen to him justify the Huracan as an everyday vehicle... taking the kids to school my ass - unless one at a time. You can pick up groceries in a moped ffs. Oh well, he says he couldn't be happier so good on him.
edit: I was looking for the Scandinavian dude who bought the Lambo, blew the engine and cried about the maintenance and repair costs. Can't find it though.

I saw in the description that the coins were bought in 2011 at $115 per coin and they were sold around $5,600 per coin, so it can be a bit difficult to hate too much on that - even though BTC's highest price in 2011, or even prior to 2013 was $32, so he must have had bought those $115 coins in 2013.

So, then there could be a question regarding how much of the stash was used to buy the lambo (or perhaps what percent of the stash), and surely it was not even new.. it was in a wreck prior to repurchase. If he had paid $250k for the used Lambo, then that would still be 44 BTC.. and yeah, I suppose, if he had a couple hundred bitcoin, then that would have had been only around 22% of his coins.. yet going back to the percentage issue versus the question of whether the remaining quantity of coins would be enough or more than enough to achieve whatever might be the goals of the guy selling the coins. Even in late 2017, the 200-WMA was only slightly higher than $1k per coin, o there would have had needed to be more than 760 BTC to be at sustainable withdrawal status for $80k per year, even though surely if we were to go by BTC's then spot price, a few hundred coins would have had been enough.. and even prior to 2020, I was using $40k per year and $1 million net worth as entry level fuck you status... We might not have had realized until March 2020 that $1 million networth and $40k per year sustainable withdrawal income was not enough anymore... yet even with the $1million and $40k per year standard, the guy would need a minimum of 380 BTC (after spending the 44 BTC on the used Lambo).

It is amazing how these days the number of needed coins has come down so much... which might even trigger me into thinking that spending 5% of coins for luxury or trivial matters might not be a BIG deal, even if we seem to be going through a lot uncertainty these days and also more and more draconian measures towards the bitcoiners.

Quote from: OgNasty on Today at 08:36:52 PM

Read this thread and tell me who it reminds you of. Cheesy

Going broke and trying to frame me as a scammer because I hurt your feelings has become an age old tradition here at bitcointalk.

You figure out some way to to make any topic about you and how you are so much greater than anyone else...

Cheesy

Quote from: r_victory on March 25, 2026, 08:47:08 PM

Olá, meus amigos e amigas!

Os resultados da votação e do sorteio foram divulgados.

Parabéns ao nosso querido TryNinja por ganhar, adivinhem... O prêmio de Ninja do Fórum Cheesy

E parabéns ao bitmover por ser um dos ganhadores do sorteio...

Me desculpem pelo spoiler, mas eu não consegui me conter de emoção. Grin

Parabéns aos amigos TryNinja e bitmover, infelizmente eu não fui sorteado dessa vez como no ano passado, mas vamos participar mais na votação do ano que vem, essa competição é bem legal e é uma forma legal de conhecer os outros usuários do forum de maneira descontraída.

Espero que mais amigos dessa aba recebam mais votos.

Enfim, foi uma boa competição.

Quote from: bitmover on March 23, 2026, 04:18:17 PM

Hey JayJuanGee
I have been doing some updates in the website and had an idea. (Tell me if you ser bugs i changed a lot of stuff around)

About the simulation of the remaining stash chart.
I think the chart could show the Y axis from 0 btc to the initial btc stash. Now it shows from initial btc to "remaining" btc stash (usually far from zero.

It think it would be a more illustrative of how much btc is still left
What do you think?

Of course, I use the sustainable withdrawal tool frequently (perhaps on a daily basis?), yet I don't use the historical simulator portion of the tool (as much).. even though I recall it to be working way better than I had expected it to work... Accordingly, I cannot recall the prior version going to zero in the visual representation.

I just went back through the tool to play around with the simulator, and of course there can be some disjuncture between the date of the information on the top (sustainable withdrawal) portion, and then using the starting date on the simulator to hypothetically consider how many BTC a guy might have had on a past date as compared with a present date... so frequently there are needs to consider quantity of coins on certain dates to be able to allow the simulator to give accurate answers, and the numbers can frequently end up being so amazing that we might have to do a double-take to figure out if we are making the proper estimates and using the tool correctly.

So, for example, in January 2021, my projection of a guy being able to sustainably withdraw $80k per year, suggests that a guy would have had needed have at least 102.5 BTC to be able to sustainably withdrawal at $80k per year (and that would be withdrawing at 10%... and that sounds like such a ridiculously high quantity of BTC.

And, this is what it looks like from January 2021 and anticipating withdrawing $6,666 per month.

Yet if we look at that same thing in the simulator, we would see that over the past 5-ish years, we would have had withdrawn right around 26.23 BTC ($1,3 million), and so right now we would still have right around 76.26 BTC.. so at a 10% withdrawal rate based on the 200-WMA value, our wealth still ends up going up around 5x in terms of our withdrawal potential.

At the same time, even if we had maximized the tool to withdrawing at 30% (in term of measuring from the dollar value), we still would have had retained 42..13 BTC after our withdrawal of 60.37 BTC ($2.8 million) over the past 5-ish year.

Of course, the tool allows us to look at withdrawing strictly from the BTC quantity, which would have caused way more BTC to have had been withdrawn, yet even at a 30% withdrawal rate, we still would end up retaining 23.75 BTC right now after having had withdrawn 78.75 BTC (nearly $4 million) over the past 5-ish years.

At the same time, I am suggesting that right now, we ONLY need 15.1 BTC in order to retain an $80k per year income at a sustainable rate that even includes giving a 7% raise each year based on the dollar rate.

It may well be the case that 5-ish years from now, BTC ended up growing in dollar value way faster than the withdrawal rate, even though I feel that I am proclaiming a fairly aggressive withdrawal rate to be sustainable (meaning that the dollar value is growing faster than the withdrawal rate as long as there is enough BTC in the stash).

I am not even asserting that there is anything wrong with the tool, even though I am sticking to my preference of wanting to use the 200-WMA as the measure of value and the measure of an appropriate withdrawal rate, even though it seems to end up being way more conservative than using the spot price that ends up using the BTC quantity as the withdrawal measuring amount.

At the same time, I wouldn't mind being able to show a 7% increase each year in the dollar amount that is withdrawn in the simulator (by using some kind of an additional setting that allows for annual increase in the withdrawal amount - which makes more sense, to me, when it is measured from dollars rather than from BTC), even though that might be complicated to add such a feature to the simulator portion of the tool.

Quote from: bitmover on February 11, 2026, 05:53:58 AM

It is probably that the managers could have some funds left after making all payments .. but what would they do with that money? As the service is gone, money cant even be given back to services...

It depends on case by case basis. I have distributed the leftover funds among the campaign members of a service that rug pulled a few weeks ago. There was a victim who also received some funds to recover his loss.

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 08:17:22 AM

Generally, since they aren't breaking any rules here, there's not much that can be done.

Not everything can define by rules, there are no official rules in this community as well. However, there should be a line of responsibility especially when you are with the community that has created by Satoshi himself and you are representing this respected community in some ways. Sure anyone can use loopholes of a system like Jambler campaign but I wouldn't endorse and continue communication with a service knowing it has built on stealing money from any community on the internet. It's now too hard to avoid the connections presented and I haven't read any convincing line of defense too from officials.

Quote from: bitmover on March 24, 2026, 02:39:25 PM

Quote from: Wapfika on March 24, 2026, 11:42:12 AM

I don’t collect faucet on Bitz since I’m just opening my account rarely to play on my free time. How many days you spend to collect that huge stack of Sats?

I collected for a few days.

But i made a high bet in a game and won! I dont remember which game it was, but i kept the money. I couldn't withdrawal so I just left it there...
I hope it is worth something now.

You’ve got a nice luck on growing your collected sats through gambling. Been doing that in the past but no luck on turning small amount to a decent win in able to withdraw it.

I wonder if the Sats earned through bets will still be counted on the promotion or just the Sats through faucet is eligible.

Either way, you’re killing it with your good run using faucet free earnings.

I'm no longer surprised by the occasional Miss Bitcointalk nomination, but I got curious who nominated me as "Discovery of the Year":

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on March 25, 2026, 08:07:16 PM

List of candidates who received 3 or fewer votes
Discovery of the Year: promise444c5 (3), GazetaBitcoin (2), mikel_012 (2), stwenhao (2), Adiljutt156 (1), Asanoha (1), Charles-Tim (1), Cookdata (1), LoyceV (1), M47AK16 (1), Mia Chloe (1), Trêvoid (1), VashaUdacha777 (1), albon (1), bitmover (1), danadc (1), examplens (1), hosemary (1), howardsentell (1), icopress (1), imthegreat (1), joker_josue (1), katanic97 (1), satscraper (1), sausalitox (1)

I tried to find who nominated me, and went over the voting topic several times, but the closest one I found is this:

Quote from: inspace on February 28, 2026, 03:59:14 PM

Code:

Discovery of the Year: stwenhao

I couldn't decide until I saw LoyceV's post, and then I remembered something. About a month ago, I spoke with ico, and he shared his impressions of stwenhao and his unsuccessful attempts to invite him to a signature campaign. I read his post history and realized that this guy deserves this award, as his posts over the past year have truly transformed the tech section.

Did I overlook something, or is this a mistake? He didn't vote for me, he voted for stwenhao.

Quote from: Biodom on March 25, 2026, 08:21:31 PM

[edited out]

It's most certainly not the case.
That said, I consider all declarations on how one or another asset class or a stock is currently "winning" as being false or very myopic.

We don't know much, especially about the future (to paraphrase Yogi Berra) .
I guess that if we had something like the "Foundation"'s Phychohistory, then we might have been able to make such predictions, but nothing like this has been developed yet.

Or, perhaps:
"The future ain’t what it used to be." (also per Yogi Berra).
I would be certainly hope that it is not, though.
[/quote]

For my pondering over the status of my bet that is set to end in less than a week (as I type this post), I was using another Yogi Berra related to: "it's not over until it is over," - even though in reality time is running out.

Quote from: philipma1957 on Today at 12:07:30 AM

Watching the Yankees on Netflix.
At JJG at a minimum I will continue the stacking for at least 10 months via mining.

So 1.6+0.4= 2.0 coins.
If price goes up to 222 I would ladder sell 0.2 and on Jan 1 I would be

2-.2= 1.8 only if we reach 222k price.
If we never reach 127-222k

No sales at all so 2.0btc and knowing me some dip buy. So 2.22 btc unlikely could my number

My own expectation of selling on the way up is that my BTC stash would shrink, so I sell without having any expectation of increasing my BTC holdings - even though probably the various ups and downs through the years has resulted in slightly more bitcoin, but amount that are not greater oni any kind of meaningful way.

For example, if I had ONLY been employing price-based sustainable withdrawal with buy backs based on dips, then maybe by time we return to $126k, I might have a couple of percent more BTC,yet only because the price had gone up and down several times over the period of time that we were correcting... which I think that the same is true with $69k. It took a bit more than 2 years to get back to $69k, so maybe my BTC stash was up 4% at most..

Now if I were to add time based sustainable withdrawal into the mix, then that would end up flatting out any BTC stash increase, so perhaps taking away any stash increase, and I expect with the passage of time, the BTC stash should start to shrink.. .. but yeah, if the price continues to go up, the value of the BTC in terms of dollar, would likely be ongoingly going up, so even if we might imagine a scenario in which I were to have had ended up selling 10% of my BTC over the period of 2021 to early 2024 (when we returned to $69k and made new ATHs, we might even consider that the BTC price had previously been maxed out around $20k (in 2017), but then in 2025/2026 bitcoin's floor moved up into the $50ks.. and surely if we measure the value of the BTC from the 200-WMA, we can see that bitcoin's floor moved from up from $4k in mid-2019, to $22k in mid-2022, to $59k right now, so even if I might have had ended up selling 10% of my bitcoin stash (or even if I ended up selling 20% of my BTC stash), the overall bitcoin holding largely had appreciated by nearly 15x during that period of time.. even if some of us are concerned that BTC prices had not gone up enough, it still seems that its floor (approximated by the 200-WMA) had ended up going up from $4k to $60k in the past nearly 7 years (those 200-WMA values as compared with BTC spot prices can be reviewed on the sustainable withdrawal website).

Many of us spend a lot of time proclaiming how bored we are with bitcoin price dynamic, but it really does seem to be holding up quite well when looking at it over a cycle or two.. and even right now the price history continues to support the case that the BTC price is holding up quite well (in the whole scheme of things)... and personally, I am still unsure if the bottom is in, since I personally feel that I would need to witness the BTC price spend some time (around a week might be enough?) supra $100k before I might start to be willing to enter into bets with me proclaiming that "the bottom is in."

Quote from: philipma1957 on Today at 01:47:02 PM

last year I sold under 0.05 btc
I added over 0.6 btc it was a good year for stacking

This year I added over 0.15 btc
Hoping for more than 2 btc by Dec 2026

over 1.6 btc now
my ladder sales start at 127k
and go to 222k

and I only have 0.2 btc listed

For sure, I have been torn about executing sales prior to reaching overaccumulation status, even though on the face of it, your intended structure does not seem bad... even though if you were to not accumulate anymore bitcoin and if the BTC price were to shoot up to $222k, you would end up selling 12.5% of your stash within the span of about a 3x increase from our current about $71k BTC price. It is not unreasonable, even though presumptively the sales would be within various intervals.. and of course, you are saying that they would be starting around $127k.

It seems that if you were able to accumulate more BTC (presuming that you are still accumulating bitcoin up to a certain prices - perhaps up until $110k or something like that? - I am not sure if your accumulation of BTC is intended to be ongoing)... but anyhow, if you were able to accumulate up to 2 bitcoin, then you would end up selling 10% of your stash with such 3x-ish rise in the price... Again, a little messy, but not seeming to be unreasonable on its face.

By the way, personally, I would prefer to consider these as hypothetical numbers, even though you seem to like to throw out a lot of specifics that might not be necessary... even though specifics can also be helpful for guys to attempt to learn from, even though many times it would be better for guys to stick with hypotheticals.. .. one the hypotheticals that many of us like to bring up is the guy with 20 bitcoin (which I used to refer to as the whimpy investor, even though relatively speaking, he is not seeming too whimpy in recent times if he were to have such a stash), and the other hypothetical guy is the one who seeks at least an $80k per year withdrawal rate.

It likely seems to many of us that the guy with 1-2 BTC is going to surely become one that is harder and harder to reach, and even the guy with more than 0.63 bitcoin is becoming difficult to reach, too.. even though they can still serve a good examples, to consider bitcoin accumulation targets and/or various ways to consider attempting to manage the bitcoin stash.

Quote from: Biodom on Today at 03:13:14 PM

Quote from: xhomerx10 on March 24, 2026, 07:20:10 PM

Quote from: Lucius on March 24, 2026, 03:25:49 PM

If you plan to buy a Lambo, do it as soon as possible because otherwise you might have some problems - not with the price, but with how you get in and out of it Grin

https://x.com/PropositoyVida/status/2033374759896207629

It's almost as though the car is giving birth.

This dude almost had a stroke doing that.
Note to myself...maybe a bit too late for a lambo, albeit he has quite a few years on me, most likely.

Surely guys age differently, yet I would consider that maybe the guy is in his mid-ish 70s. Perhaps?

Quote from: WatChe on Today at 05:07:37 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 09:20:05 AM

Quote from: WatChe on March 24, 2026, 03:57:08 PM

Quote from: Lucius on March 24, 2026, 03:25:49 PM

If you plan to buy a Lambo, do it as soon as possible because otherwise you might have some problems - not with the price, but with how you get in and out of it Grin

https://x.com/PropositoyVida/status/2033374759896207629

Thats why I sell my BTC last year to buy a new car. I am still young enough to drive that.

Yes.
Hahahahaha

Keep telling yourself that buying the car was a good idea.

Trust my JJG. Whats the point of investing in Bitcoin, if we can't use it to make our life better.

Between I have already explained you many times the scenario in which I bought car and you agreed that it was fine. Should I narrate that scenario every time I talk about my new car purchase?

You don't need to repeat. More or less, I remember... and I know I can be a bit of a pain in the ass from time to time... not completely on purpose, since I have talking points that differ from yours in terms of how to balance bitcoin accumulation - and at the same time, how we balance ends up having some personal preference components.. .that may well relate to differing perceptions of investment versus consumption versus utility.. and so the formulas are not completely objective.. I will give you that.. but I won't agree to stop responding to it, if you mention it.

Quote from: OgNasty on Today at 05:25:30 PM

Quote from: WatChe on Today at 05:07:37 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 09:20:05 AM

[edited out]

Don't listen to him. He complains anytime anyone else sells any BTC to improve their lives while at the same time he sells BTC every single year just to live and will sell another 4% of his stack in this down market while expecting to be praised for having such a genius retirement plan. He doesn't do anything to support the market, even going as far as to criticize people who continue to stack sats... A total hypocrite.

Of course, you have everything figured out in your own ways of "not listening to me".. hahahaha...

I will agree that some guys have better ideas in relation to bitcoin (or might it be bitcoin investment management?) than other guys, so we still have to figure out our own balances in regards our bitcoin versus our cash versus other places that we might choose to put our value, whether we might consider ourselves to be still accumulating bitcoin and surely some guys want to shave off some "profits" along the way in their bitcoin investment journey, to the extent that they might or might not end up selling too much of their corn too soon, is not always easy to determine in the moment....

Your own arguments seem a bit strange and a bit of a straw-man, even though at some point I did mention some accounts that I have that are authorized to pretty much sell 4% of bitcoin (annualized) no matter the BTC price, in alignment with my time-based sustainable withdraw ideas, including abilities to use the sustainable withdrawal tool as a reference. I would be able to carry out that level (or even up to 10% based on the 200-WMA valuations) for the remainder of my bitcoin holdings if I were to choose to do so.. and so I suppose in that respect, I have not even been acting within my own abilities to consume, if I were to want to ramp up my consumption levels.

So thinking about the guy who currently would like to withdraw $80k per year with a likely ability to increase his dollar withdrawal amount by 7% each year, the tool currently shows that it would be best for such a guy to have at least a BTC stash that is 15.1 BTC, and surely if he were to have more than 15.1 BTC, then he has extra cushion for the pushing within the size of the BTC stash. It surely seems like a sustainable way for a guy to live off of his BTC in circumstances that he is able to accumulate the minimum quantity of BTC (or more) for his targeted income level.

Quote from: vapourminer on Today at 05:30:49 PM

Quote from: WatChe on Today at 05:07:37 PM

[edited out]

JJGs just mad cuz hes gonna lose that bet

Sucks... right?

Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 10:07:44 PM

Quote from: Itz-prisigold on Today at 07:40:11 PM

Wowww I never knew that collecting SATS consistently can build up this massive amount though, and it's funny how I only started yesterday. Seeing this balance have really encouraged me to put more effort. I always use to feel reluctant whenever I get notifications about rewards because I feel the rewards where just little but from today I will be very active. Remembering how long I've registered on Bitz, if I had been collecting my daily SATS then I think it would have build something good by now. Anyways congrats to you.

Hello prisi, how massive is bitmover's sats balance? Grin

This made me to recall Bitz_Casino post above about hyperbitcoinization. Maybe it is time we begin to measure BTC by it's true unit (sats), so that I will be feeling like a bitcoin millionaire.

5,552 sats is not up to $4, so it is not massive lol.

Now this actually made me laugh so bad while reading this comment, 😂 I actually thought that was a lot if it's converted into dollar and now that I'm seeing the worth, it's actually making me laugh. But that is still something because you are not working for it, all you have to do is to login your account and collect your daily SATS and consistently it will result to something good some day, because little drops of water makes a mighty Ocean. So I will still be collecting my daily SATS everyday.

Quote from: Itz-prisigold on Today at 07:40:11 PM

Hello prisi, how massive is bitmover's sats balance? Grin

This made me to recall Bitz_Casino post above about hyperbitcoinization. Maybe it is time we begin to measure BTC by it's true unit (sats), so that I will be feeling like a bitcoin millionaire.

5,552 sats is not up to $4, so it is not massive lol.

Olá meus amigos e amigas!

O resultado da votação e do sorteio foram divulgados.

Parabéns ao nosso querido TryNinja por ganhar, adivinhem... O prêmio de Ninja do Fórum Cheesy

E parabéns ao bitmover por ser um dos ganhadores do sorteio...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578419.msg66546413#msg66546413

Me desculpem pelo spoiler, mas eu não consegui me segurar Grin

The winner of the Special Raffle is cande86!

Quote from: icopress on December 25, 2025, 02:22:30 PM

[...] there will also be a special raffle with a personalized BTC Romania plastic card + $200! 🎁 Note.

We also want to congratulate the other winners! You will be contacted shortly and each of you will receive a prize of $150 in bitcoins.

Code:

Winner 1: Sexylizzy2813
Winner 2: Woodie
Winner 3: NeuroticFish
Winner 4: inspace
Winner 5: Btcdeybodi
Winner 6: Wakate
Winner 7: Tinubu
Winner 8: LoyceV
Winner 9: Wake Up
Winner 10: Su-asa
Winner 11: nutildah
Winner 12: dkbit98
Winner 13: Fiatless
Winner 14: Porfirii
Winner 15: bitmover
Winner 16: Mia Chloe
Winner 17: Foxpup
Winner 18: Bigjoe33
Winner 19: W Jr.
Winner 20: Lillominato89

Code: (Full Slots)

icopress
icopress
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
SamReomo
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Karl_3000
Barikui1
Barikui1
Barikui1
Barikui1
Barikui1
Barikui1
Barikui1
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
SatoPrincess
Su-asa
Su-asa
Su-asa
Su-asa
Su-asa
Su-asa
Su-asa
Nathrixxx
Nathrixxx
Nathrixxx
Nathrixxx
Nathrixxx
Nathrixxx
Nathrixxx
rachael9385
rachael9385
rachael9385
rachael9385
rachael9385
rachael9385
rachael9385
rachael9385
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
adultcrypto
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
Bigjoe33
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
bitmover
NeuroticFish
NeuroticFish
NeuroticFish
NeuroticFish
NeuroticFish
NeuroticFish
NeuroticFish
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
Dreadboost
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
MorganaX
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
justinlamode
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Victorybit1
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
Jaycoinz
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
TryNinja
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
Floczy
zasad@
zasad@
zasad@
zasad@
zasad@
Satofan44
Satofan44
Satofan44
apogio
apogio
apogio
apogio
apogio
apogio
*Ace*
*Ace*
*Ace*
*Ace*
*Ace*
*Ace*
m2017
m2017
m2017
m2017
m2017
m2017
lovesmayfamilis
lovesmayfamilis
lovesmayfamilis
lovesmayfamilis
lovesmayfamilis
lovesmayfamilis
AprilioMP
AprilioMP
AprilioMP
MAAManda
MAAManda
MAAManda
MAAManda
Tmoonz
Tmoonz
Tmoonz
Tmoonz
bangjoe
bangjoe
bangjoe
bangjoe
bangjoe
bangjoe
BABY SHOES
BABY SHOES
BABY SHOES
BABY SHOES
BABY SHOES
Lillominato89
Lillominato89
Lillominato89
Lillominato89
Lillominato89
Lillominato89
Lillominato89
babo
babo
babo
babo
babo
babo
babo
LFC_Bitcoin
LFC_Bitcoin
LFC_Bitcoin
LFC_Bitcoin
LFC_Bitcoin
LFC_Bitcoin
LFC_Bitcoin
Fivestar4everMVP
Fivestar4everMVP
Fivestar4everMVP
Fivestar4everMVP
Ojima-ojo
Ojima-ojo
Ojima-ojo
GeorgeJohn
GeorgeJohn
GeorgeJohn
GeorgeJohn
GeorgeJohn
GeorgeJohn
Bright0515
Bright0515
Bright0515
Bright0515
Bright0515
Bright0515
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Btcdeybodi
Sexylizzy2813
Sexylizzy2813
Sexylizzy2813
Sexylizzy2813
Sexylizzy2813
Sexylizzy2813
giorgione
giorgione
giorgione
giorgione
Lida93
Lida93
Lida93
Lida93
Lida93
Lida93
Lida93
Lida93
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bitbollo
bastisisca
bastisisca
bastisisca
bastisisca
bastisisca
MainIbem
MainIbem
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
The Sceptical Chymist
verdinio
verdinio
verdinio
verdinio
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
Majestic-milf
pewboy
pewboy
pewboy
pewboy
pewboy
m4r1o
m4r1o
m4r1o
m4r1o
m4r1o
KingsDen
KingsDen
KingsDen
KingsDen
KingsDen
changaa
changaa
changaa
changaa
changaa
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
bubilas
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
summonerrk
cande86
cande86
cande86
xenomorfo
xenomorfo
xenomorfo
xenomorfo
xenomorfo
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Tinubu
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
Pmalek
promise444c5
promise444c5
promise444c5
promise444c5
promise444c5
promise444c5
promise444c5
imthegreat
imthegreat
imthegreat
imthegreat
imthegreat
imthegreat
imthegreat
Woodie
Woodie
Woodie
Woodie
Woodie
Woodie
Rockstarguy
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
examplens
banana33
banana33
banana33
banana33
banana33
sabotag3x
sabotag3x
sabotag3x
sabotag3x
dollyamo
dollyamo
dollyamo
dollyamo
Wakate
Wakate
Wakate
Wakate
martinom
martinom
martinom
blomen
blomen
blomen
blomen
blomen
blomen
blomen
blomen
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
Peanutswar
kennycryptoitalia
kennycryptoitalia
kennycryptoitalia
kennycryptoitalia
GiftedMAN
GiftedMAN
GiftedMAN
GiftedMAN
GiftedMAN
GiftedMAN
aipercoin
aipercoin
aipercoin
fluffaloo
fluffaloo
fluffaloo
fluffaloo
fluffaloo
Wake Up
Wake Up
Wake Up
Wake Up
nutildah
nutildah
nutildah
nutildah
nutildah
nutildah
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
TypoTonic
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
Obim34
EFS
EFS
EFS
EFS
EFS
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
joker_josue
sotelorene
sotelorene
sotelorene
sotelorene
sotelorene
sotelorene
sotelorene
sotelorene
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
d5000
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
dkbit98
ABCbits
ABCbits
ABCbits
ABCbits
ABCbits
ABCbits
ABCbits
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
famososMuertos
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Sir_Garry55
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Odohu
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Foxpup
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
Perfectbaby
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
notblox1
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
obuoma
Mhizlove
Mhizlove
Mhizlove
Mhizlove
Mhizlove
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
fillippone
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
AakZaki
Yablee0
Yablee0
Yablee0
Yablee0
Yablee0
Yablee0
Yablee0
Yablee0
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
PowerGlove
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
LoyceV
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
Porfirii
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
taufik123
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
bestcandy
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
Luzin
safar1980
safar1980
safar1980
safar1980
safar1980
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
Etranger
xLays
xLays
xLays
xLays
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
holydarkness
W Jr.
W Jr.
W Jr.
W Jr.
W Jr.
W Jr.
Mustang Shelby
Mustang Shelby
Mustang Shelby
Mustang Shelby
Mustang Shelby
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
Rikafip
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
katanic97
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
JollyGood
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
Fiatless
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
GazetaBitcoin
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
inspace
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Forsyth Jones
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Mia Chloe
Pjcr7
Pjcr7

🔍 You can check the results here: Special Raffle, Main Raffle. Wink

Quote from: icopress on Today at 04:20:10 PM

We're almost ready! The winners of the raffle will be determined by block 942180!

Quote from: icopress on Today at 05:36:16 PM

The winner of the special raffle will be determined by block 942185!

Quote from: ➥ Bitcointalk Quiz 2026 [Active] ➥ Last year's Event [Results] ➥ Voting BCA 2025 [Thread] & [Discussion Thread]


Craft Master Hhampuz	Hero of Good theymos	Discovery *Ace*	Forum Ninja TryNinja	Local Hero igebotz

Miss Bitcointalk Foxpup 🦊 ________________________	Help Buster lovesmayfamilis ________________________	Bitcoin Geek JayJuanGee ________________________	Best Project BitList ________________________	Best Event Pizza Day Contest __________________________

As we wrap up the BCA 2025, we would like to thank everyone who took the time to participate and write detailed answers.

Congratulations to everyone who made it into the top three in each nomination, and congrats to all raffles' winners. Thanks to everyone who continues to make the forum better! And I (and icopress) wish to express my deepest appreciation for PowerGlove's help, which made some insane efforts for giving a hand with the votes counting. Next year, we'll also be making a MEGA update to the event's format. 💪

Voting Results ^{[Only those who received 4 or more votes]}



	Hero of Good	theymos (60), satoshi (26), LoyceV (13), icopress (12), o_e_l_e_o (11), 1miau (7), pooya87 (7), Mitchell (5), fillippone (5), condoras (4)

	Local Hero	igebotz (30), CryptopreneurBrainboss (24), Mia Chloe (20), fillippone (12), Husna QA (7), babo (7), Charles-Tim (6), Plutosky (6), Julien_Olynpic (5), Pmalek (5), EFS (4)

	Forum Ninja	TryNinja (41), JayJuanGee (27), LoyceV (24), fillippone (13), DdmrDdmr (10), PowerGlove (10), vapourminer (9), icopress (8 ), philipma1957 (6)

	Bitcoin Geek	JayJuanGee (35), fillippone (22), nc50lc (12), ABCbits (10), NotATether (10), gmaxwell (8 ), pooya87 (8 ), stwenhao (7), Charles-Tim (6), GazetaBitcoin (6), LoyceV (5), achow101 (5), d5000 (5)

	Discovery of the Year	*Ace* (21), Satofan44 (17), AakZaki (6), PowerGlove (4), RebelMoney (4), TypoTonic (4)

	Help Buster	lovesmayfamilis (30), nutildah (28), AakZaki (26), LoyceV (8 ), Ultegra134 (7), holydarkness (6), ABCbits (5), Lafu (5), GazetaBitcoin (4)

	Craft Master	Hhampuz (40), icopress (34), Little Mouse (21), TryNinja (15), PowerGlove (11), Trofo (7), taufik123(6), AB de Royse777 (5), cryptofrka (5), jayce (4)

	Miss Bitcointalk	Foxpup 🦊 (25), lovesmayfamilis (24), SatoPrincess (16), Floxynice (15), Mia Chloe (10), Etranger (9), SmartGold01 (8 ), Mindyspace (4), xenomorfo (4)

	Best Event	Pizza Day Contest (32), Bitcointalk Community Awards (28), Naija Cooking Contest (25), Pumpkin Carving Contest (17), Turkish Monthly BTC Price Prediction Contest (5), April Fools (4)

	Best Project	BitList (45), TalkImg (19), BPIP (8 ), Bitcointalk SuperNotifier (6)

_________________	_________________

This is second year in a row when we apply the 0.75:1 votes reduction rule and not at only 2 categories, like last year, but at more of them! As a consequence, we have the following changes:

1️⃣ lovesmayfamilis, which received most votes at "Miss BitcoinTalk" (32), remains with only 24 votes, as she won this category last year as well (the outcome of this being that Foxpup 🦊 became the winner of first prize at "Miss BitcoinTalk")
2️⃣ CryptopreneurBrainboss, which received most votes at "Local Hero" (32), remains with only 24 votes, as he won this category last year as well (the outcome of this being that igebotz became the winner of first prize at "Local Hero")
3️⃣ Hhampuz, which received most votes at "Craft Master" (53), remains with only 40 votes, as he won this category last year as well (however, he keeps his first prize at current edition as his remaining votes still place him on first place).
4️⃣ Pizza Day Contest, which received most votes at "Best Event" (42), remains with only 32 votes, as it won this category last year as well (however, it keeps its first prize at current edition as its remaining votes still place it on first place).

List of unaccounted nominees and votes

Code:

criptoevangelista, Pablo-wood, DaNNy001, Donneski, Obulis

List of candidates who received 3 or fewer votes

Code:

Hero of Good: PowerGlove (3), ABCbits (2), DdmrDdmr (2), Hal (2), NotATether (2), achow101 (2), babo (2), suchmoon (2), BlackHatCoiner (1), Cyrus (1), HCP (1), HI-TEC99 (1), Hhampuz (1), HostFat (1), Little Mouse (1), Pmalek (1), Rikafip (1), Vod (1), Welsh (1), Xal0lex (1), d5000 (1), examplens (1), gmaxwell (1), hugeblack (1), krogothmanhattan (1), laszlo (1), minerjones (1), nutildah (1)

Forum Ninja: NotATether (3), theymos (3), ChartBuddy (2), GazetaBitcoin (2), bitmover (2), joker_josue (2), nutildah (2), ABCbits (1), Cyrus (1), DirtyKeyboard (1), JollyGood (1), LFC_Bitcoin (1), OgNasty (1), Porfirii (1), Rikafip (1), Trofo (1), apogio (1), cryptofrka (1), hugeblack (1), krogothmanhattan (1), lovesmayfamilis (1), nc50lc (1), pooya87 (1), suchmoon (1)

Bitcoin Geek: Mia Chloe (3), dkbit98 (3), igor72 (3), mocacinno (3), BlackHatCoiner (2), Cricktor (2), PowerGlove (2), gbianchi (2), icopress (2), Cookdata (1), DdmrDdmr (1), Forsyth Jones (1), Hhampuz (1), Husna QA (1), MoparMiningLLC (1), TryNinja (1), examplens (1), hosemary (1), notocactus (1), paid2 (1), philipma1957 (1), willi9974 (1), zasad@ (1)

Discovery of the Year: promise444c5 (3), GazetaBitcoin (2), mikel_012 (2), stwenhao (2), Adiljutt156 (1), Asanoha (1), Charles-Tim (1), Cookdata (1), LoyceV (1), M47AK16 (1), Mia Chloe (1), Trêvoid (1), VashaUdacha777 (1), albon (1), bitmover (1), danadc (1), examplens (1), hosemary (1), howardsentell (1), icopress (1), imthegreat (1), joker_josue (1), katanic97 (1), satscraper (1), sausalitox (1)

Help Buster: Don Pedro Dinero (3), PowerGlove (3), Wake Up (3), Mia Chloe (2), YOSHIE (2), hosemary (2), icopress (2), vapourminer (2), Awaklara (1), Cyrus (1), DdmrDdmr (1), EFS (1), Lachrymose (1), Obim34 (1), Pmalek (1), Porfirii (1), Rikafip (1), Satofan44 (1), The Sceptical Chymist (1), albon (1), bitbollo (1), gmaxwell (1), hugeblack (1), igebotz (1), joker_josue (1), julerz12 (1), mandown (1), philipma1957 (1)

Craft Master: CryptopreneurBrainboss (2), RebelMoney (2), Vod (2), inspace (2), krogothmanhattan (2), minerjones (2), vapourminer (2), *Ace* (1), 1Dq (1), Cyrus (1), Liquidoptions (1), LoyceV (1), Mia Chloe (1), Mitchell (1), Porfirii (1), Rikafip (1), cygan (1), hilariousandco (1), ibminer (1), julerz12 (1), memehunter (1), polymerbit (1), r_victory (1), theymos (1), virginorange (1), willi9974 (1)

Local Hero: GazetaBitcoin (3), Rikafip (3), Wake Up (3), icopress (3), joker_josue (3), katanic97 (3), sabotag3x (3), slackovic (3), Lachrymose (2), Shadiq (2), arulbero (2), blomen (2), darxiaomi (2), dkbit98 (2), famososMuertos (2), gbianchi (2), klarki (2), xzone (2), 1miau (1), AakZaki (1), Ale88 (1), Daniel91 (1), Don Pedro Dinero (1), DrBeer (1), Hispo (1), HostFat (1), MaxMueller (1), NeuroticFish (1), PX-Z (1), Porfirii (1), SFR10 (1), Smartvirus (1), The Sceptical Chymist (1), TryNinja (1), Upgrade00 (1), Vispilio (1), alegotardo (1), apogio (1), bitmover (1), criptoevangelista (1), cryptoaddictchie (1), examplens (1), humerh3 (1), jeremypwr (1), m2017 (1), mandown (1), mu_enrico (1), nc50lc (1), ovcijisir (1), r_victory (1), rdluffy (1)

Miss BitcoinTalk: Lillominato89 (3), Becassine (1), Disruptivas (1), Lannakosa (1), LoyceV (1), Sandra_hakeem (1), achow101 (1), igebotz (1), krogothmanhattan (1), womanderful (1)

Best Event: The cancellation of Epochtalk (3), Naija Fruit Carving Contest (2), Roobet Art Contests (2), 100 Push-Ups Per Day Challenge (1), 10th Anniversary Art Contest (1), Plan B Forum 2025 (1), Rainbet's BSFL (1), Rainbet's FPL Football Pool (1), Rollbit's 2025/26 Champions League Pool (1), Sportsbet.io's EPL Football Pool (1), The "mixer ban" being softened slightly (1), The $126k ATH (1), The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (1), The GENIUS Act (1), The Nigerian Local Board (1), The Pizza Day ATH Coincidence (1), The U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (1), The appointment of new merit sources (1), The growth of DeFi (1), The improvement of bitcoin-related U.S. politics (1), The various draws/contests/challenges on the "Games and rounds" board (1), bitbollo's Bitcoin Collectibles Meetup (1)

Best Project: Bitcoin (3), Talksearch.io (3), Bitcointalk (2), Loyce.club (2), Rainbet (2), ShadowPulse (2), Stake (2), b1exch.to (2), bitmover's Giveaway Manager (2), AOBT (1), Acebet (1), BRDb (1), Betpanda.io (1), BitMixList (1), BitVM2 (1), Bridgoro (1), Ethereum (1), Jackpotter (1), KYCnot.me (1), Ninjastic.space (1), Rollbit (1), Satori Coin (1), ibminer's Merit Poker Collectible (1), promise444c5's Banned Users Identifier (1), splash.tf (1)

Statistics:

This year we had 164 unique users nominated for 8 categories. Excepting them, some were also nominated as being event or project In comparison, last year we had 186 users being nominated.
The greatest number of nominations received by a user was 60 (theymos at Hero of Good category).
The biggest difference between a first place and a second place was 34 votes (theymos vs. satoshi, at Hero of Good category). Last year biggest difference was of 18 votes, between PowerGlove and 1Dq, at Discovery of the Year category.
Some mentions of Best event / project were merged all together, as they were written with words suggesting same idea. (Big thanks again to PowerGlove for trying to match each such vote into an adequate slot!)
Some votes for nominees / categories which had their name spelled incorrectly were merged together (Mia Chloe and Mia Chole, Bitcoin Geek and Bitcoin Greek (lol) etc.)

Quote from: icopress

Made with 💗 for the Bitcointalk public.

Amount in BTC	Confirmed (UTC)	Tx
`0.00500000`	`2026-03-25 14:19:52`	`a538b1e7e4b0eeb661deb7c31db0ad512ffd96044d1fc92c322329b75c7fc9d3`
`0.00700000`	`2026-03-11 10:51:18`	`786b73c9db1e6d831d57ce159204534a47909406677068e91616f31864b683ab`
`2.56536737`	`2026-02-07 00:04:05`	`a73335706adad5c400453fbc3c992f23cacf56b0ca964bc584f5f44ac7e0d412`
`0.02184558`	`2026-01-17 16:39:36`	`8199a72f489f9833989681e0d343ebf28ce44b69bc85cd8a095a147480a7215d`
`0.01400850`	`2026-01-17 15:24:14`	`056ddaa21d7fb5bc587b892b85aef442f00748ecaff1d560661619703f15dce9`
`0.00500000`	`2026-01-14 13:02:36`	`d01a8329f6e8373b3ca5f1cbcd310b8de5f2501fef44e0457f488bb76ab51430`
`0.00545227`	`2025-12-21 12:05:02`	`8c719d92865620a031036ff4fb8be82318337035c3809325c63830d5d7b909bb`
`0.00690000`	`2025-11-17 14:57:06`	`2b38dc88097605a1fc8665c82f1db395393d5b551a5c6857572367dee0d68b96`
`0.00713168`	`2025-11-12 16:59:55`	`98a9447d4e0fecea8a47f5b3dcfad8003db396eeaf3b4be6c400b96b71ab3320`
`0.00500000`	`2025-10-07 09:57:33`	`3c46228ba39b23d8a20e5db73bd5c901bcd3b755bd5a342389f474fbd7c58ea2`
`0.01197173`	`2025-09-29 10:56:34`	`bb5fca631509fbc35a6468f5968c816079d9b87fec6f50b7d6fe8a25190466e1`
`0.04896090`	`2025-09-27 08:38:41`	`877fae4692b985b5635780b1e7f98e04dc4891793b49ab40d82ac411458ceca9`
`0.18413749`	`2025-07-31 04:28:10`	`7bcbabc6f02368fc7ba1b8d239658d80741bbd8543861207c2531ecc0da5bc10`
`0.01015827`	`2025-07-25 13:13:55`	`d6b771a052263fe74140485ea2f3e4d26bedfe7e290e439a8a8fba52add42a7a`
`0.14318933`	`2025-07-21 04:40:18`	`41be08df8445313340e4865cf2f5124b5606eaf807f6582a5c6716d96e9a3027`
`0.15341422`	`2025-07-14 04:26:16`	`8b0ea01018dd85c541a33f2fa086349e6c9913a032c3adc11bed9c21ecb93de5`
`0.33300000`	`2025-07-10 19:29:38`	`fd82374c8ca1f9440e1ffe6999bf919f0c45cbe5aa4d1332e0dd769458219a36`
`0.17165662`	`2025-07-07 04:21:29`	`e4663f4fedbab8c65c69c0d69a4cdfe5e59a7645cce236276ff48d67ec7ffe8d`
`0.00500000`	`2025-07-04 09:08:58`	`c82d355b0ac315a49b0e3144b0e2b060c36f38421eb8d677d0215ac844e2ffae`
`0.00500000`	`2025-06-30 12:35:45`	`4eb3d81a6e52b83bffc90d15091f7983c16c062e791e6b01279db975bf27e61b`
`0.00500000`	`2025-06-30 08:48:51`	`e7314f650a24c78e8397392c47f5938d3e9bda9dc625cedfca421847b6bd6438`
`0.18458032`	`2025-06-30 06:25:38`	`6ba77eb9299e9438ed32261827bc23b8a21a0db2e873f0dfb6b275c26d9ce866`
`0.00921466`	`2025-06-29 09:26:01`	`555006acc092ee2ad53e0de6467f8ce7e3c5177beb71a943a98d7cd52b3c9888`
`0.02673751`	`2025-05-29 12:01:34`	`da77413f13bf77d261dda66b0d1ea26ca2db0c5802cfea96c95d85d1a72a6832`
`0.00615091`	`2025-05-15 19:37:43`	`b1f61c0e64c2c0a9a787d25d4f86d50d0e49f587c736218fc2f04d4eee841add`
`0.00600000`	`2025-04-28 10:08:26`	`adbc26914040cc65e24defb69f9b4442bbd6a2264cf1e25a601cce950ba6a8e0`
`0.00500000`	`2025-04-07 07:25:18`	`8644fc777d52e8e850ecc192cfaa246805e31bc763d84a055244872bf4dcb711`