That's great to hear

I have just added this, that's actually a very nice feature.

Here's the sample of how it works

---

I have thought of this as well, i even tried it, but there are lots of issues, one is CORS problem, some sites don't work well. Also, it takes time, like several seconds, which is not appropriate how fast copy and paste is and knowing how patience work for some of most, so i abandoned the idea lol

Yeah, the free image hosting sites that tends to link their site with the img tag. But this is not what I originally had in mind, though this too (feature) is somewhat needed if OP wants to further improve his tool.

What I want is, select and paste and the selected part gets embedded with the link.

like this below...

Cool, thanks. I'll check on this.

Usually, i struggle on how to make/generate an icon or the design of it when it comes to this. Well, anyway, i will just look for some reference.

Yes, I believe it may be related to that.
I've noticed this difference since March. I think I have more bots visiting, and I've already blocked some.
But I'm trying to take some time to better understand what's causing this increase, and whether it makes sense for it to exist or not.

From personal experience I agree 100 percent.  You can keep trying to avoid paying the highest rates and then if you add up all the ways you took around it, you realize it was actually more expensive both in money and in time than if you simply used the one, simple but more expensive way instead.

I really have a bad experience of pasting links to adding url tag and adding text on it that's why i came up such an idea and have a time thinking to code lmao.

I actually may consider adding a new button especially for mobile phone users as i didnt try it there yet, only on desktop. If someone can do, i appreciate it. I might try it later today though.

Today is the last day of our contest to submit or edit your predictions 🚀💰 BTC CONTEST "SIGNATURE BAN" [BTC PRIZE] 🚀💰[/b]

Remember that if we dont reach at elast 20 participants we are not gonna play it. (im gonna make a new one if that happen to see if changing something more people is set to play).

Tagging people who already played some of my previous contest, i dont know who already submit or not.

Clock is ticking.

Thanks, Bitmover. It’s good to see you.

Brave’s integration of Tor is generally intended for low-stakes privacy , such as bypassing simple censorship or ISP-level blocking.

Se o flavio for eleito pode ter certeza que um dos ministros vai ser o Bessias.

Sleeping easily is the best decision. Even some people have a different mindset, so they can afford to sleep after wrecking their accounts, but the majority can't. So always know where you stand. If you can't sleep well after a few losing trades, then bro, that's not for you. Better we control our emotions, which is easy, not that hard.

Because everything is a skill set. Just like AI learns and creates skill sets, we can also learn and create our own skill sets. We can learn how to control emotions by fighting with them on a daily basis and by knowing what our tools are in this fight.

Exchange rate is certainly an important condition when choosing instant exchange, but it does not always have to be decisive.
For example, what I noticed is that several very competitive instant exchangers often have an additional "lag" when exchanging with XMR in the relationship.
There are certainly those who want the swap process to be instant and not to last several hours.

O mais importante para mim é que o próximo presidente vai poder escolher 4 ministros para o STF, e o histórico de Lula é assustador:

- Advogado pessoal (Zanin)
- Ex-ministro da Justiça do seu governo e petista (Flávio Dino)
- Ex-Advogado-Geral da União do seu governo e garoto de recados (Jorge Messias)

Mesmo que Flávio Bolsonaro não seja flor que se cheire, é melhor um embate maior de ideias do que uma hegemonia exclusivamente Lula.

I enjoy projects much more without dealing with accounting systems

In theory, the Torrent solution would be perfect: if 1000 people per day download it, they'll share the majority of bandwidth consumption amongst themselves and my problem is gone But so far, I only get a few downloads per day. Let's see if this is a deal breaker before trying more drastic measures

I've never used and always Ignored all chatbots I see

I don't really like using things I don't understand.

Then I'll have to keep track of who shares their link with whom, and it's terrible for privacy.

It should still work for automated downloads, as that's how most people use this.

But there's a bigger "problem": I never created this with the intention of earning money from it. I kinda like how this data has become so established that even people on Github link to addresses.loyce.club. Charging money for it would scare off the large majority of users, even if it's just a small amount.
So for now, I'll just try the Torrent solution for a while.

If someone pays that much for something they can create or download for free, that's on them

I'd do that, if I'd know how. It was mentioned on the previous page:

xyz domains are commonly blocked by many security appliances and email filters by default. That's how bad it is.
Alphabet has 100s of 1000s of domains with all extensions for many reasons, they buying a $1.99 domain means nothing.

Anyway, I think this should be in the altcoin section since it does not matter to people who are holding BTC.

With the above being said, has anyone done any sort of looking at the code to really see what it was doing?

-Dave

I only see people who can trust anything to store their valuable assets .

TLD doesn’t really matter, anyone can turnout to be a scam anytime.. even if they start as legit.
Talking about the “xyz”, I found it to be more suspicious to me too ,even though TlD doesn’t matter.. maybe it because of the “.xyz” per se 

https://urlhaus.abuse.ch/browse.php?search=.xyz

I don’t really look into them, but now i understand why they are pricey..

I tend to agree with bitmover here. Maybe DEX.fo is not too dangerous as a competitor to OKX, but besides DEX, there are other exchanges. I'm sure there are more on the list that are false-positive blacklisted. From their perspective, why not make it harder for competitors to access, at least for their own users? I assume that mostly only OKX users have their browser add-on installed.
There are a lot of people who treat CEX as a wallet. I'm sure many of them don't even know how instant exchangers work and that everything is possible without a KYC procedure. It's better for OKX if many remain in the dark.

Genuinely appreciate all four of you taking the time on this — not something anyone had to do, and it makes a real difference on something we can't fix unilaterally from our side.

"Direct" is traffic when someone types your domain directly into a browser. I assume a small part of that is traffic you generated while developing this tool.
Also, "direct" traffic can occur if Cloudflare eats the "referrer" and displays fake direct. Often links from forums or Telegram lose the referrer header, so they show up as direct.
In general, it's not a big deal. You are interested in the traffic of real people anyway. This is just a short explanation for a better understanding of the structure of visits in your statistics.

I have to admit that I am also surprised by the traffic from DuckDuckGo. Obviously, the owner of the site is a good source of traffic.

It's certainly been a very bad period for Aqua and the JAN3 team. The Liquid Federation is missing around 600 LBTC unless something changed last night. That's quite an amount. Blockstream is beta testing Blockstream Swaps. Perhaps in the future, JAN3 and Aqua Wallet will look to partner with them and continue where Boltz left off. There has been no news coming from Boltz ever since the ownership change and the website is offline.

Congratulations bitmover.
I searched on DuckDuckGo with the keyword bitcoin message verifier, and the first result showed your website.
You have done a good job. However, I didn’t see the PGP message verifier tool on DuckDuckGo. I am not sure if I searched with weird keywords.

Pelo o que eu estou lendo, não é caso unico no forum. Parece que ultimamente tem surgindo essas contas.

Ou seja, a malta das alt farms, poderá estar a mudar a estratégia. Pegar em varias contas antigas, e espalhar-se pelo forum a tentar passar-se por alguém de varias comunidades locais. Tentar disfarçar a coisa... tentar!

I think because the .xyz is so cheap, this is the reason why many scammers choose to use that domain.

That one actually perfect for those people want to create clones, phising and for temporary site.

But yeah I agree that not all sites using .xyz are scam, but due to many scams happening and what people usually notice that the site scam them is using .xzy domain. It left some impression to people that majority of the site using that are just the same scam.

O que ue não entendo é a dedicação dele em continuar gastando tempo com isso aqui, será que ele pagou caro demais para não desistir tão rápido?

Concordo em partes,

Antes das HW modernas, como que a velha guarda fazia todo esse esquema seguindo boas recomendações de segurança? Tem gente que faz isso até hoje e as alternativas apresentadas aqui é pra quem não confia muito mais em trezor/ledger/bitbox depois do acontecido com coldcard e data leaks vazados da Trezor e Ledger.

Usar impressora offline, antiga já resolve, e se mesmo assim não atender a paranoia, criptografa a(s) chaves privada(s) com BIP38, se por algum motivo a impressora tiver um backdoor instalado, mesmo sendo offline, ela vai ter uma chave criptografada, a senha só você terá.

Uma chave criptografada com BIP38 começa com 6xxxxxxxx

Não precisa salvar chaves privadas isoladas tbm, basta gerar uma seed phrase offline em um software como sparrow, electrum e etc, pegar a xpub e ela vai gerar endereços públicos pra sempre, você só precisa ter um dispositivo offline que vc garante que é seguro pra assinar as transações.

A xpub vai pra uma hot wallet e pode ser no celular.

I'm glad this turned out to be a good idea for your site. What's certainly interesting is that this tool has been recognized much more outside of both forums, where it was primarily presented.

As far as I can see, you get the least amount of traffic from Google.
Solving that should be high positioned on your to-do list.

DEX.fo_off Thanks for hearing me, I understand your side. Just gave my opinion.


Do you think they do it because DEX.fo is a competitor of OKX? Hmm, that's a strange angle, because I don't think they should worry about DEX.fo. They have been in the business for years and still feel insecure by a platform that has just come into the market? Do they even know about DEX.fo?

Hmm this can be beneficial but I am good with my one long term mindset instead of having two. Dopamine is important we can get that any other way but yep profit keeps the spirits up and we tend to make more losses because after that we make stupid decisions and face losses.

The burden will still be on the shoulders of the holders, this can't reduce it.

Here's the link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf6dEq2jEsmteHeqnS6S_Pq3kbGr30se1hXg-gZqFKPHLZi1A/viewform

My understanding is that historically and perhaps in the past 20-30 years, there has been a lot of over diagnosis and over treatment when it comes to concerns about prostrate cancer.


There is no such thing as a "baby bull pattern."  #justsaying


Of course you are puzzled, and that is likely part of the reason that you are still fucking around trying to trade rather than buying and holding when you could have had a BIG ASS bitcoin stack size if you had not been fucking around for each of the past 4-ish cycles that you have been in bitcoin.

Yeah, sure maybe this particular cycle you may have had gotten lucky or partially lucky, yet even that is not clear, not that anyone needs to know the details of your stack size and/or the various opportunity cost you fucked up based on your ongoing inabilities to think beyond the short term and/or your seeming inabilities to think in terms of long term investing rather than trading.

Over the years, you end up leaving all kinds of money on the table while you are counting the times that you one on the your supposed trade when you have likely missed out on multiples and magnitudes of compounding portfolio valuations based on your not always being in when you should be and trying to spin your actions as if you were doing something less than dumb.


Yes, of course, you cannot even appreciate the value of buy and hold and ongoingly invest into bitcoin until you reached such status of enough bitcoin or more than enough bitcoin.  You don't seem  to understand the concept, yet you seem to want to ongoingly lecture guys about some kind of supposed value in trying to play cycle swings, as if any mere mortal is capable of determining when the price is going to go up, down or sideways, even though maybe retrospectively it might have had appeared obvious, it tends to not be obvious when we are in the midst of ups, down or sideways periods.


If you have reached overaccumulation status that means that you have enough or more than enough bitcoin.  Do you need another example?

Let's say that you had not been such a retard in your first 6-ish years of being in bitcoin and you had mostly concentrated on accumulating bitcoin rather than fucking around trying to trade it.

So perhaps between June 2011 and May 2013, you did not have much of a budget, and so you ended up investing $100 per month, and so you ended up investing $2,400 and you accumulated 120 BTC ($20 per coin).

Then let's say between June 2013 and May 2017, your budget was a bit better and you were able to invest $100 per week, which would have had been $5,200 per year and $20,800 after 4 years.  After 4 years, you would have had accumulated 41.6 BTC.

So then if we consider the whole matter of ongoingly and persistently accumulating bitcoin for about 6-ish years between June 2011 and May 2017, you could have had invested right around $23,200 in total and had accumulated right around 161.6 bitcoin.. which surely could have had put you at something near overaccumulation status at some point later down the road, even if you had stopped accumulating more bitcoin  

A large number of guys right now would be quite well off with 161.6 BTC, since it would have a 200-WMA value of nearly $10.5 million and a spot price value of more than $12.7 million.

You could even have around a sustainable monthly withdrawal amount that would be close to 1 bitcoin per month.

You seem to not understand and/or value the power of ongoing accumulation of bitcoin to reach a large enough or a greater than needed accumulation amount.


Instead of sucking the dick of a dumbass short term trader, you need to zoom out a wee bit in order to understand the value and the power of accumulating and/or holding bitcoin over more than one whole cycle prior to starting to "cash out."  

Maybe try doing some longer term math that might involve a couple of cycles rather than trying to fuck around within parameters of current cycles, and yeah, OgNasty seems to remain uncertain if the low for this cycle is "in," yet, which adds up to a lot of time both being out when he should be in and also a lot of time of failing/refusing to continue to accumulate bitcoin, when he seems to already ongoingly admit that he does not have enough or more than enough bitcoin.


Hardly even meaningful if you could have had a bitcoin portfolio size of 161.4 BTC or greater and you are talking about selling 1-2 bitcoin for potential capital gain tax exemptions of $49,450-ish?


We can agree to disagree, especially since even if bitcoin is continuing to be issued and we know the rate of issuance, there is no manipulation of bitcoin's issuance schedule which is a pretty damned strict kind of issuance schedule that is unlike any other asset class (or money) currently in existence.

Acho que é muito mais difícil de acontecer e muito mais fácil de remediar..

Em comparação com esse ataque da Liquid, seria como se alguém fosse a um banco e conseguisse trocar US$ 320 milhões de USDT por USD.. e o banco trocasse na hora porque não viu nada de errado nas moedas


Foi no BTCPay Server.. não diretamente na LN, mas muita gente usava.


Também achei que seria algo entre 5 a 10%.. mas acho que os dois lados saíram bem satisfeitos..

Pelo visto rolou uma negociação.. ai fica a linha tênue entre bug bounty e extorsão

 RULES

---

• We have now 10 slots! YES, 10 slots only
• You must complete a successful order with Priamex from the time this event is live until the deadline time.
  
• The winner takes all!
•  Last date to book your slot: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
• Pick a SLOT you like.
• You can not edit your entry. If necessary then remove the old entry and make a new one.
• We will find the winnersusing Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on the 💰 R7 Bounty Hunters - Telegram Chat
• My decisions are final, you must follow the Priamex Terms
• You will receive reward directly to your Bitcoin address.

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -  
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -  
8   -
9   -
10   -

 ENTER

---

Accepted slots

---

No winners for this round. Good luck with the next one.


Please verify.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (19) 10471 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 24140: qwk (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5767 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11429 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4798 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3668 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 10092 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6918 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (14) 6807 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (37) 1952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 13887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6817 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6977 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +7 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3920 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10719 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4496 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (24) 12159 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2937 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4714 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (32) 6372 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3158 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6740 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1415 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2251 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1507 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1367 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3716 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1329 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6998 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2037 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2345 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5156 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2366 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3704 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (40) 13353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1489 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2391 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3686 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2216 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3528 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 21352 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3096 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 2612 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 5829 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5820 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3796 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1912 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4186 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (29) 8260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10190 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5395 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 982 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10071 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1298 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3627 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2285 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (8880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (15040 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Dá pra gerar chaves privadas que podem ser usadas como paper wallets através do BIP85, visite meu post sobre.


Mas vou continuar usando o BIP39 tbm.

Eu ainda preciso ver, ainda não está definido, e dá pra fazer isso de maneira segura tbm através de dispositivos offlines airgapped como a Krux.

Your reply did not changed my point of view.
Once again, I did not promote my service anywhere. It is one dev letting the other dev checking their work and expecting some comments. Spam is something else.
yes, I took it personally because I think you were rude. If you cannot appreciate others work, just ignore them. There is no reason telling peoples efforts are doomed to failure right from the start. What you call as failure is my success. You should do something better and let everyone see how you do it, and why your work is better than someone else. Moreover, this is not off-topic. I am still discussing about the tool built by bitmover and I. I appreciate he checked my tools.

Infelizmente vc ainda não entendeu o meu caso de uso, deixa quieto, o Bitcoin Core já me atende pro que eu preciso, já uso há quase 10 anos mesmo (e esse é um dos motivos).

Sim, eu sei que posso sugerir lá, mas precisa ser uma nova conta, pois não quero que relacione a minha conta lá que tem meu nome pessoal e foto com a minha conta do forum. Quando eu puder, eu crio uma conta lá e comento.

Eles já removeram o importprivkey já (eu sabia que eles removeriam uma hora ou outra). Acho que já até fiz post reclamando dessa remoção.

Estou pensando em aderir paper wallet ao meu setup e um computador offline airgapped, ainda não vou parar de usar hardware wallets, vou migrando aos poucos (embora usar hardware wallets seja muito bom).

Veja um exemplo de como ficaria de um mod que eu fiz que eu pedi pro grok builder fazer (vibecoding):







É a carteira ibis, uma carteira muito legal, parecida com a electrum e sparrow, ela tem a opção de import privkey. Fiz um post detalhado aqui

What service and promotion are you talking about?
Take a good look at my post, please. I posted about my tool on July 19, not just two days ago. I’m not sure why you’re being so aggressive about it. My website does not display any ads. I have a few tools on my website, and they are for people to learn more about Bitcoin. I am not making any money from it. I would actually appreciate it if someone created another website similar to mine for the Bitcoin community. I didn’t see this coming, to be honest. I don’t understand why the hate. But bitmover commented in my thread and made some good suggestions to improve one of my tools, which I implemented in a day, and he said he liked it.