Last update: 2026-09-20_Sun_18.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
bitmover receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. bitmover
2. FeeBuddy
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "bitmover" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67162274 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 18:01:49 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
I think you alrrady lost a lot of money overcomplicating things.
I would definitely buy tether gold or gold etf in your situation.
You will waste money in physical gold fees and spread in price. Or even get scammed. There are billions of dollars in tokenized gold and trillions in ETF market. You are safe there.
I even considered entering a gold option in the dca calculator, but it defeats the purpose of the website.
I think I will add other currencies such as EUR and BRL and maybe a few more
Yeah, I know about the gold market and all that, but it's just how I see things under my control, and with BTC I prefer to hold everything under my possession now. But I will give it a try as well, thanks for mentioning.
That's a good idea to add a gold DCA calculator. If it defeats the purpose of the site, you can create a mirror site or another site if it stays in budget! But yeah, it might not get the same kind of traffic from here, so.
I will bookmark this site, TBH I was using the site for AltcoinsTalks for mentioning them, then for some time I started to face problems, and then I moved to another bot. It was when that forum was not allowing scraping maybe, it was a long time ago. Now it works fine.
2. Post 67161565 (unedited backup) (by Porfirii) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 13:33:31 CEST 2026) in [Mega recursos para newbies] Busca y encuentra lo que necesitas sin preguntar.:
Exploradores de bloques de Bitcoin- Si te preocupa la privacidad, usa siempre Tor cuando uses cualquier explorador de bloques de Bitcoin.
Etiquetas de comunidad sobre una dirección de Bitcoin- Las Etiquetas pueden ser válidas o inválidas. Úsalas solo como información en bruto. DYOR
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Enlace | | | Acceso Tor | | | Notas | | |
| | | Bitcoinwhoswho.com | | | No | | | Etiqueta direcciones, exchanges, pools de minado etc. buenas/malas | | |
| | | walletexplorer.com | | | Sí | | | Conexiones de historial de transacciones y direcciones | | |
| | | bitinfocharts.com | | | Sí | | | Usa recursos disponibles, no puedes etiquetar direcciones | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Enlaces | | | Notas | | |
| | | newhedge.io | | | Estima el próximo cambio de dificultad, tiempo, ... | | |
3. Post 67161557 (unedited backup) (by Porfirii) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 13:32:38 CEST 2026) in [Mega recursos para newbies] Busca y encuentra lo que necesitas sin preguntar.:
Autor:
notocactusHilo en inglés:
[Mega resources for newbies] Check here, find most of your need, before asking.
Notas- Los newbies hacen demasiadas preguntas repetidas, y este hilo está aquí, en el tablero de Ayuda, para ayudarles a encontrar las Q&A más básicas, sin preguntar.
- Espero que este hilo pueda ayudar a reducir dichas preguntas, al menos puede ayudar de algún modo.
- Sé que algunos newbies no harán caso de este hilo, pero dejémosles vivir.
- El hilo está en elaboración, y aún no está terminado
- Está bloqueado temporalmente, para evitar el spam. Lo desbloquearé cuando esté terminado.
ÍndiceTemas relacionados con el foroHerramientas creadas por la comunidad del foroCampañas de firmas y avatar creadas por la comunidadLibros sobre Bitcoin* Los enlaces a descargas de algunos libros se han tomado de [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Los enlaces pueden romperse en cualquier momento, depende de Maus0728.Recursos para el aprendizajeWallets
Traducción ofrecida a iniciativa de:
4. Post 67161446 (unedited backup) (by Porfirii) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 12:37:25 CEST 2026) in [DO NOT DELETE] AoBT Spanish Translations (Drafts):
Bitcoin block explorers- If you care about privacy, always use Tor when using any Bitcoin block explorer.
Community tags on a Bitcoin address- Tags can be valid or invalid. Only use them as raw information. DYOR
Debug & Simulation ScriptsMempool Observing toolsBitcoin Testnet FaucetsBitcoin Difficulty Estimator | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Link | | | Notes | | |
| | | newhedge.io | | | Estimate next difficulty change, time, ... | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Link | | | Notes | | |
| | | Heyapollo.com | | | ETF details (fee), charts exclusively animated | | |
| | | Bitcoin Strategy | | | Chart, Newsletter | | |
| | | Blockworks.co | | | ETF details (fee, status, AUM ..) | | |
| | | Coinglass.com | | | ETF details (fee, status, AUM ..) | | |
| | | ETFdb.com | | | Bitcoin ETFs List (factsheet, ...) | | |
| | | Farside.co.uk | | | Bitcoin ETF Flow (table, cumulative flow chart) | | |
| | | Bitcointreasuries.net | | | Bitcoin ETF overview, stats, balance sheet history | | |
5. Post 67161439 (unedited backup) (by Porfirii) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 12:36:01 CEST 2026) in [DO NOT DELETE] AoBT Spanish Translations (Drafts):
Autor:
notocactusHilo en inglés:
[Mega resources for newbies] Check here, find most of your need, before asking.
Notes- Newbies ask many repeated questions, and this thread is here, in Beginners & Help board, to help them finding most basic Q&A, without asking.
- I hope this thread can help to reduce such questions, at least it can help somewhat.
- I do know some newbies will not care about this thread, but let them be.
- The thread is composing, not completed yet.
- It's temporarily locked, to avoid spam. I will unlock it when it is finished.
Table of contentsForum-related topicsForum community-built toolsCommunity-led signature & avatar campaignsBitcoin books* Downloadable links for some books are taken from [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Links can be dead anytime depends on Maus0728.Learning ResourcesWallets
Traducción ofrecida a iniciativa de:
6. Post 67160824 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 04:19:49 CEST 2026) in JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas:
[edited out]
The aim of what we’re always discussing here and what JayJuanGee is advising is so guys can be able to make better choices/decisions with their investments no matter the level of their incomes and how it comes.
The DCA is a proven best strategy for every kind of investor but
some investors once in awhile defer to buy the dip or lump sum by their own decision. What’s important in all these is remaining consistent and investing with discretionary money.
You are convoluting lump sum and buying the dip.
They are not the same.
Guys might ONLY have opportunties to lump sum when they come accross some extra money, or otherwise, they could free up some money from some other investment that they have.
Whenever a lump sum comes available, there still should be a consideration about the extent to which the lump sum will be used to 1) buy right away, 2) defer by time (DCA) and/or 3) defer by price (buy dips that might not end up happening).
A great thing about lump sums is that it gives options that may well go beyond the usual income situation that a guy might have on a weekly/monthly basis.
Even for newbies, there seems to be no reason to wait for a dip, cheer for a dip or even welcome a dip, but instead do not let the dip bother you since when there is a dip, and if you are ongoingly buying bitcoin, then during such dips, if they arrive, you are getting more bitcoin for the same amount of dollars.
Spot on sir, I'm glad to see that you did justice to this, so that both newbies and other investors that might be confused about this subject, will understand that waiting for the dip is of no use, I don't know how it will sound that a newbie that is ready both mentally and financially will decide to wait for the dip, without considering the delay and discourage that might arise while waiting, what happens to acumulating with our discreationary steadily with the DCA method which will also cover both the dip or anytime, I think if a newbie wants to buy during the dip, waiting for the dip is the best way to go about it, rather he can start acumulating Bitcoin gradually and consistency,
then buy agressively at any slightest dip, I do not buy the idea of doing nothing by deceiving oneself that they want to buy the dip.
If a guy already has a relatively aggressive bitcoin buying routine of buying bitcoin every week, then I don't know why he would have any extra money for buying the dip, since if he has extra money to buy the dip, then he probably was not buying as aggressively as he had though that he was in his regular weekly bitcoin buys.
[edited out
What are you talking about, it's a good reason if a newbie can buy Bitcoin when it's low, there is nothing wrong with understanding this very early, it makes no sense to buy Bitcoin all for the sake of you need to buy it and hold.
Newbies need to understand that buying Bitcoin in some period of time is better than blindly buying, if a newbie has bought Bitcoin at 80k when it topped at 126k thinking it's th best time to buy they would lose their cool and patience seeing BTC at 58k.
They are new so they will react to this price action, so it's the right thing to guide them right about the bull market and the bear market,
after a new all time high bitcoin will go down, what goes up must come down, DCA is sweeter on the lows than DCA on every move. You might be lost KiaKia. This is not a trading thread.
Since you have been registered here since April 2022, then maybe you have been able to accumulate some bitcoin in that time of slightly more than 4 years, yet if you have been distracted by fucking around with trading, then maybe you have not been very focused on persistent, consistent, regular, ongoing and perhaps even aggressive bitcoin buying.
Even a straight-forward strategy of buying
$100 per week of bitcoin since April 2022 would have caused $23.4k to be invested and a current BTC stash size of 0.555 BTC, which is not bad. Are you saying that you trading has done better than that, @KiaKia?
Many times it can be difficult to measure meaningful results over a mere 4 year cycle, yet if you had spent 2 cycles accumulating bitcoin, then it becomes even harder to beat a straight forward bitcoin accumulating strategy as compared to a strategy that fucks around with trying to time dips and those other various inferior strategies - especially if your goal might be bitcoin accumulation.
7. Post 67160537 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sun Sep 20 00:34:13 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Personally, I think that gold is a BIG ASS waste of time, and if you are going to include gold, then try to make sure that it is less than 10% of the size of your bitcoin holdings.
Really! Are you saying this because of its volatility? BTW, thanks for the 10% tip but can you share more like what you actually think about gold?
Ultimately, you can do whatever you like, and surely in the last year and a half or so, a lot of people got excited about gold, so it did have some price spikes, yet gold has not really performed very well compared to bitcoin for the past 14 or so years.. maybe if we start measuring from January 2012.
Essentially if you think about the qualities of money, gold has almost no abilities to compete with bitcoin, and in that regard, bitcoin is about 1,000x greater than gold even though bitcoin currently has around 1/20th gold's market cap.
Money qualities are scarcity, verifiability, transportability, divisibility, and costs for storage/transport etc. There is no way that gold can meaningfully compete with bitcoin, even though it could take 50-200 years or more for the market to reflect the fair value/price of each.
Of course, guys trade instead of invest, so many times they are ending up with way less bitcoin than they should have had or could have had if they had stayed focus on getting to an accumulation goal that is reasonable for their anticipated income level and/or lifestyle... in which bitcoin may well be able to either completely replace their income level or to supplement it.
I can hold for more than 20 years but it is not about age for me, it is about resources and I just hope the effort will pay up because when you are accumulating with this mindset you don't want to depend on one card alone,
Of course, I cannot tell you about how to invest or the extent to diversify, yet it seems to me that a guy could spend one or two cycles, perhaps even 4-10 years or more just building his bitcoin and cash, yet it depends on how much of his income he is able to put into bitcoin.
Many normal people struggle to be able to consistently save/invest 10% of their income, and surely we can see that a guy who is saving/investing 10% of his income, then it is going to take him 10 years to save/invest 1 year of his income, and so surely within the range of investing 5% to 25% of your income, the guy who is consistently investing 25% of his income would have had been able to save 1 year of his income in 4 years, and surely it seems to me that having a goal of being able to put one or two years of your income into bitcoin would put your bitcoin into a pretty good place..
And, yeah, in the beginning, guys might have bad habits regarding how much back up funds they are keeping, so maybe if they are in the early stages of building their bitcoin holdings they might get their bitcoin holings and their back up funds up to various points that might be 1-3 months of their expenses, yet it seems to me that the larger the bitcoin holdings, then the more justifiable it would be to build up back up funds that are greater than 3 months, and perhaps the larger that the back up funds grow, then there might be some need to put those back up funds into places other than cash, but from my perspective the back up funds and the alternative investments still would not have greater priority that focusing and building the bitcoin holdings, since bitcoin has been and likely will continue to be amongst the better places (if not the best place) to put value and to focus on keeping value there as compared with other places that value might be put.
like these days people are so focused on having multiple jobs, not because they can't make enough from one but because they don't trust their feelings anymore that everyone else is doing two jobs then why I would rest, so the mindset has caused many people so much stress already that they are finding more than one source of income because depending on one is not a thing anymore so coming from that line,
It might be a bit problematic to be considering cashflow and diversification of income in similar ways as you think about diversification of investments, even though surely I can relate to the idea that guys want to be marketable and to be able to get high paying jobs. The more marketable a guy with skills, experiences and perhaps even connections, then the more that he can obtain higher paying income, so he may well not need to have multiple jobs if he has a job that pays well. I recall when I graduated from college, my pay went up several times higher than what it had been, and then within that job my pay again doubled once in about 3 years and it doubled twice around 8-9 years into the job, and I was not even in one of the higher paying sectors for my own skills, experiences, connection and education levels, and for sure, I am not even claiming to have had connections, since surely guys with connections can get even quite higher paying jobs than the jobs that I had.
I understand that some parts of the world it is harder to break into the higher paying jobs as compared with other parts of the world, so I cannot really proclaim that I know what guys can do or need to do, since guys likely have various kinds of opportunities based on their age and whatever job skills they have or the kinds of work that they had done, including that some kinds of jobs have more potential to lead into higher pay as compared with other kinds of jobs.
I also can't depend on btc alone I have to save cash whcih you said for cash flow management which is obvious but apart from that an investment class other than btc should also be kept aside for safe haven kind that's why I put gold but you said it is waste of time.
I think that I already described some of my ideas of cashflow management in this post, and if a guy is starting from absolutely nothing, then he is likely building his bitcoin and his cash (such as his back up funds) at the same time, especially in the beginning, yet if a guy had already been investing for 4-ish years, then there might be a presumption that the guy had built a good financial base that includes both his back up funds and his investments, whether bitcoin or other investments that he might have. I am not opposed to some level of diversification, even though I think that it is better to build the bitcoin and cash first with most of the emphasis on building the bitcoin before adding other investments, and surely if you are a student and/or you do not have a lot of discretionary income, then you could end up diluting whatever funds that you have with inferior investments, whether we are talking about gold or other inferior places that you could end up putting your value.
In the end, you have to figure out some kind of balance that comforts you in terms of how much you are focused on building your bitcoin versus getting distracted into inferior investments.. .and yeah, if you don't have confidence in bitcoin, then you may well be led into believing that there are all kinds of other great places that you can put portions of your discretionary funds... no one can really decide for you, yet if you spend 4-10 years or longer building various aspects of your investment portfolio and maintaining strength in your cashflow management practices (systems) then you will be able to measure where you are at various points along the way, and surely it can become problematic when guys spend 4-10 years or longer fucking around with inferior investments rather than figuring out how to put most of their emphasis on bitcoin ..
and of course, there are no guarantees no matter which investments you choose and/or no matter how you end up choosing how to allocate your resources. Each guy has to decide these allocation and cashflow management matters for himself and perhaps hope that he does not end up having a lot of resentment 4-10 years or longer down the road. We cannot go back in the past, and so we really only have our ongoing daily/weekly planning that we need to figure out and to be comfortable with and hope that after 4-10 years or longer we have ended up making choices that we don't regret.
Recently @JayJuanGee told me the most popular DCA calculators aren't working anymore. He suggested me to create a new one, and here it is. I think it was a nice idea, thanks JJG.
A brand new DCA-Calculator created specially for bitcointalk community
Very impressive
Chat GPT was already getting tired of me trying plan my future witch Bitcoin and backtesting as well
Although I don't know if it will be possible, the investment inflow is just one figure, assuming I get better jobs and increase investment, I would also love to see what potentials that holds as well,
Can you add something like % increase of investment within a particular period of time? Even if it is an option that you can change back anytime. Because the standard calculator still has to be available too.
I don't know if that can work as well, if it doesn't it's okay, me and chat GPT already had some confusion in that aspect too, crazy AI..
Yeah.
Guys want bitcoin DCA calculators to tell them what is going to happen in the future, when that is not what BTC DCA calculators do.
Of course, each of us can anticipate how much we are going to make and how much we will be able to put into bitcoin, and we can even project out our investment into the future by using something like an Excel spreadsheet - in which we can put a base case scenario that we consider to be the most likely scenario, and then we can also plan out better and best case scenarios and also worse and worst case scenarios. Spreadsheets can be quite powerful and incorporate our own detailed information as best as we are able to plan our own future detailed information.
When we project out, we can project our own income increases and we can also project out debasement of the dollar (and other fiat - which means rises in the cost of living) and we can project out how we expect bitcoin to perform in the future that would affect how much BTC we are able to accumulate and also what we perceive the value of that bitcoin will be as compared with other places that we could put our value.
8. Post 67159880 (unedited backup) (by Floczy) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 20:55:01 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Recently @JayJuanGee told me the most popular DCA calculators aren't working anymore. He suggested me to create a new one, and here it is. I think it was a nice idea, thanks JJG.
A brand new DCA-Calculator created specially for bitcointalk community
Very impressive
Chat GPT was already getting tired of me trying plan my future witch Bitcoin and backtesting as well
Although I don't know if it will be possible, the investment inflow is just one figure, assuming I get better jobs and increase investment, I would also love to see what potentials that holds as well,
Can you add something like % increase of investment within a particular period of time? Even if it is an option that you can change back anytime. Because the standard calculator still has to be available too.
I don't know if that can work as well, if it doesn't it's okay, me and chat GPT already had some confusion in that aspect too, crazy AI..
9. Post 67159548 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 19:00:19 CEST 2026) in 🔥 CavemanSwap.com - || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $50 Prize Pool 💰:
♻️
CavemanSwap is a non-custodial, no-account cryptocurrency exchange designed for simple and private swaps. Operating with a No-Js minimalist, caveman-themed design, the platform allows users to trade supported cryptocurrencies (such as BTC, ETH, XMR, LTC, BCH, and USDT) without requiring JavaScript, user registration, cookies, or personal identification. CavemanSwap is presenting a free raffle for the community.
Prize
1st: $25
2nd: $15
3rd: $10
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 50.
You can pick two if you have posted in their ANN thread before.
⚡ Three winners will
share $50 in Bitcoin* ⚡ Reward will be sent to your Bitcoin wallet.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ God Of Thunder and
CavemanSwap reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format:Slot number:
bech32 address:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
10. Post 67158508 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 11:26:13 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 203:
HostFat (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (19) 10536 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 24140:
qwk (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5819 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1769 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11477 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4815 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 2899 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 3672 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2794 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (4) 10143 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 6972 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 9027 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2195 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +56 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6291 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2640 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2205 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (14) 6864 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (37) 1957 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2390 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 13987 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6274 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 6818 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 7020 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +7 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (26) 3960 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 10848 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 784 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 4505 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 4045 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 11549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 12215 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 395806:
o_solo_miner (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2957 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4746 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 6381 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3164 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 533583:
Lucius (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 6775 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 10527 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 1418 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2287 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1517 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3998 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1368 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3740 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1349 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 7053 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 2081 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2356 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 5161 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 4675 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2381 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3774 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (41) 13415 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1498 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2398 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2116 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 2668 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3689 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 7718 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 11379 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1634314:
shahzadafzal (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 3539 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4339 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1825672:
morvillz7z (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2224 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3536 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 21453 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3187 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2626 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 2612 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 5850 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 5851 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +50 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3812 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 1913 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1708 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4192 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5818 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 8349 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 10296 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1652 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5395 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2745549:
decodx (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 984 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 10104 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6539 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1301 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3642 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 3558380:
Mia Chloe (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2288 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (
8881 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
935 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
15133 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
50 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
193 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 4528:
Matt Corallo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 10354:
JJG (
Trust: neutral) (
10 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. Post 67158136 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 08:07:07 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-09-11_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1789095097 5 5593464.msg67132042 3442679 1068464
1789094165 1 5376945.msg67129580 252510 3724979
1789094116 1 5376945.msg67129424 252510 3529859
1789093408 4 5348779.msg57439101 33156 3354519
1789093285 5 5591072.msg67037703 78147 3532477
1789090320 3 5571809.msg67080397 3593551 3733040
1789089508 1 5571375.msg67131070 3513442 3687357
1789089432 1 5593286.msg67115857 3513442 1000813
1789089244 1 178336.msg67131158 1027694 2755547
1789087786 1 5593742.msg67130555 3253914 85033
1789087680 2 5592498.msg67109251 3563972 3489395
1789087173 1 5376945.msg67128985 252510 3625720
1789086028 1 5376945.msg67128921 252510 3732181
1789085681 4 5593338.msg67130400 85033 3253914
1789084596 1 5593286.msg67131452 1000813 1554927
1789084250 1 5593776.msg67131588 1365271 1265260
1789083137 1 5592644.msg67129262 3345198 2003859
1789082937 5 631891.msg67131101 1068464 3418694
1789082204 1 5593739.msg67130130 1856852 3672878
1789081479 1 5376945.msg67128212 252510 3606054
1789081396 1 5376945.msg67128014 252510 3734097
1789081242 1 5376945.msg67127615 252510 3600557
1789081071 1 178336.msg67130765 67210 198573
1789079402 1 5591144.msg67127857 3638919 3735259
1789079359 2 5593575.msg67130349 3638919 3735259
1789078433 1 5591072.msg67131910 1593137 35
1789077827 2 5584565.msg67128944 3699287 3516832
1789077827 1 5593306.msg67122922 289817 1090299
1789076278 1 5592498.msg67117218 3688132 3716300
1789075752 2 5592234.msg67077500 64507 67264
1789075032 1 5592799.msg67128934 1283017 1827294
1789074773 2 5587528.msg67115495 3363284 3728749
1789074518 2 5593605.msg67125775 1052091 3490536
1789074333 2 1221154.msg67129282 846683 21720
1789074165 5 5593600.msg67131657 3735259 3557328
1789074093 2 5592147.msg67076976 64507 3530127
1789074078 1 5450546.msg67121633 1554927 97582
1789074016 2 5593689.msg67128452 64507 375981
1789073905 2 5483313.msg67131213 407174 912328
1789073000 5 178336.msg67131158 379487 2755547
1789072956 1 5593774.msg67131603 3558380 3465100
1789072945 2 5593774.msg67131607 3558380 3559419
1789072755 1 5593774.msg67131603 3766778 3465100
1789072694 1 5593774.msg67131603 2776678 3465100
1789072150 1 5593548.msg67123628 64507 3732285
1789072050 1 5593742.msg67130555 3547723 85033
1789071843 2 5593689.msg67128452 64507 375981
1789071735 2 5593601.msg67131261 64507 289817
1789071431 2 5593665.msg67131015 3322606 459836
1789071134 2 5578706.msg66558527 3517454 3405459
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (58 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2412 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 11 Sep 2026 04:51:37 AM CEST,
satscraper (
history) sent 5 Merit to
Xal0lex (
history) for
Re: Безопасно отщепляем BTC и продаём свои Black2b BTC..
On Fri 11 Sep 2026 04:36:05 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Alonso_ (
history) for
Re: JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas.
On Fri 11 Sep 2026 04:35:16 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Sim_card (
history) for
Re: JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas.
On Fri 11 Sep 2026 04:23:28 AM CEST,
vapourminer (
history) sent 4 Merit to
nortwood (
history) for
Specter DIY hardware wallet.
On Fri 11 Sep 2026 04:21:25 AM CEST,
Cyrus (
history) sent 5 Merit to
Volgastallion (
history) for
🚀💰 BTC CONTEST "SIGNATURE BAN" [BTC PRIZE] 🚀💰.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (613 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8881 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 935 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3767260:
nokyc_watch (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3767326:
Butrholesmasher78 (
history) earned: 3 Merit.
3767467:
redfish11111 (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3767591:
Leon Zimmer (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3767724:
Svolz (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list* (11 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3765014: AnonymtNorskNr
3765018: slowLearner2
3765075: Monetarium
3765093: snapEX.pro
3765116: nico01
3765224: ObeyKnock
3765228: betski
3765300: SatRush.IO
3765335: 5btcnear
3765376: JACK.COM
3765688: intnsity
3765697: vegasocials
3765736: Power.win
3765743: truffun
3765795: openbitcoin
3765801: coinfuty
3765834: Chief777
3765870: Julian7586
3765873: Btcroar
3765896: iloveDigit
3765903: Criptoview
3765945: frogbetcom
3765974: koilbuckethatbtc
3766003: Paco4747
3766152: VfpgK
3766252: anaxi
3766277: danfeh
3766501: Qredax
3766502: JoeBitcoinusr44
3766525: kwertykwerty2
3766558: BTC talk Official
3766587: Maniac!?
3766665: kaankaya
3766778: nobswebdev
3766836: swap_bot
3766840: MOBAZHA
3766935: Bitcoin_effect
3766938: nullmac
3766972: louis2608
3766994: t0te15
3767009: even1206
3767074: Pablo.Cash
3767115: oodog
3767119: AndreiAndrei22
3767138: KayaHodler
3767260: nokyc_watch
3767326: Butrholesmasher78
3767467: redfish11111
3767591: Leon Zimmer
3767724: Svolz
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8881
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:2
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14578:15133
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2792
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1496
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3765014:0:1
3765018:1:4
3765075:1:7
3765093:0:2
3765116:0:1
3765224:5:16
3765228:0:10
3765300:0:5
3765335:0:10
3765376:0:3
3765688:0:1
3765697:0:1
3765736:0:2
3765743:0:2
3765795:0:16
3765801:0:1
3765834:0:14
3765870:3:6
3765873:0:5
3765896:5:12
3765903:0:1
3765945:0:5
3765974:1:6
3766003:0:2
3766152:0:4
3766252:0:2
3766277:0:1
3766501:0:2
3766502:0:1
3766525:0:9
3766558:0:1
3766587:0:1
3766665:0:1
3766778:11:33
3766836:0:1
3766840:0:6
3766935:0:3
3766938:0:1
3766972:0:1
3766994:0:3
3767009:0:10
3767074:4:9
3767115:0:18
3767119:0:2
3767138:0:2
3767260:0:2
3767326:0:3
3767467:0:1
3767591:0:1
3767724:0:1
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51786Sample 1. 21656 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1128 unique users in 12557 transactions
2. 21453 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 778 unique users in 11715 transactions
3. 18926 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9997 transactions
4. 15684 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 481 unique users in 8999 transactions
5. 15133 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1235 unique users in 5520 transactions
6. 13987 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 743 unique users in 9180 transactions
7. 13415 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 621 unique users in 5034 transactions
8. 12250 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 544 unique users in 6269 transactions
9. 12215 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 507 unique users in 6705 transactions
10. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
11. 11549 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 620 unique users in 6737 transactions
12. 11477 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 593 unique users in 6611 transactions
13. 11379 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6475 transactions
14. 10848 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 683 unique users in 5843 transactions
15. 10672 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5446 transactions
16. 10536 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 347 unique users in 3856 transactions
17. 10527 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 568 unique users in 4662 transactions
18. 10296 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 552 unique users in 4739 transactions
19. 10183 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 407 unique users in 3549 transactions
20. 10143 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 465 unique users in 5524 transactions
21. 10104 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 479 unique users in 5069 transactions
22. 9363 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 545 unique users in 5073 transactions
23. 9102 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 415 unique users in 4708 transactions
24. 9027 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 587 unique users in 5368 transactions
25. 8881 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 413 unique users in 940 transactions
26. 8854 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 461 unique users in 5254 transactions
27. 8543 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4860 transactions
28. 8349 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 466 unique users in 4576 transactions
29. 7718 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 599 unique users in 4597 transactions
30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
31. 7524 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 203 unique users in 4309 transactions
32. 7316 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1874 transactions
33. 7208 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3675 transactions
34. 7176 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 231 unique users in 4095 transactions
35. 7053 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 413 unique users in 3894 transactions
36. 7020 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 388 unique users in 3583 transactions
37. 6972 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 355 unique users in 3297 transactions
38. 6864 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 496 unique users in 3831 transactions
39. 6833 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 961 unique users in 4443 transactions
40. 6818 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 280 unique users in 3055 transactions
41. 6775 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 536 unique users in 3915 transactions
42. 6735 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 208 unique users in 3897 transactions
43. 6650 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 437 unique users in 3645 transactions
44. 6539 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 440 unique users in 3826 transactions
45. 6381 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 629 unique users in 3594 transactions
46. 6291 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 223 unique users in 3660 transactions
47. 6274 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3497 transactions
48. 6087 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2649 transactions
49. 5851 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 400 unique users in 2789 transactions
50. 5850 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 465 unique users in 4108 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51737. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51738. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51739. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51740. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51741. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51742. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51743. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51744. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51745. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51746. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51747. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51748. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51749. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51750. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51751. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51752. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51753. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51754. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51755. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51756. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51757. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51758. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51759. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51760. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51761. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51762. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51763. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51764. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51765. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51766. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51767. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51768. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51769. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51770. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51771. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51772. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51773. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51774. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51775. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51776. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51777. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51778. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51779. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51780. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51781. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51782. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51783. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51784. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51785. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51786. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26776Sample 1. 78507 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 915 unique users in 13210 transactions
2. 73049 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2328 unique users in 32183 transactions
3. 69985 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3364 unique users in 18279 transactions
4. 63073 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3678 unique users in 60825 transactions
5. 60938 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4769 unique users in 34935 transactions
6. 55561 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3826 unique users in 38463 transactions
7. 46196 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2958 unique users in 16360 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 39846 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2550 unique users in 14674 transactions
10. 38391 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2966 unique users in 31080 transactions
11. 36487 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1605 unique users in 14354 transactions
12. 34595 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2232 unique users in 11707 transactions
13. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
14. 33077 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1498 unique users in 10499 transactions
15. 30174 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1468 unique users in 7936 transactions
16. 29683 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1746 unique users in 6929 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 605 unique users in 6509 transactions
20. 23897 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1402 unique users in 9676 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 19095 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1824 unique users in 4227 transactions
23. 17204 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 574 unique users in 8130 transactions
24. 17050 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 760 unique users in 6369 transactions
25. 17035 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1787 unique users in 7769 transactions
26. 16945 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1215 unique users in 9547 transactions
27. 16292 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2016 unique users in 6625 transactions
28. 15437 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1341 unique users in 8638 transactions
29. 15387 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 647 unique users in 5514 transactions
30. 14824 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1700 unique users in 7749 transactions
31. 14578 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1113 unique users in 1795 transactions
32. 14461 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3172 unique users in 7594 transactions
33. 13770 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1372 unique users in 7600 transactions
34. 13701 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 668 unique users in 3653 transactions
35. 13645 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1162 unique users in 8356 transactions
36. 13561 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5936 transactions
37. 13492 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 839 unique users in 6332 transactions
38. 13476 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 858 unique users in 4336 transactions
39. 12331 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1221 unique users in 6712 transactions
40. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
41. 10816 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3987 transactions
42. 9066 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 595 unique users in 7672 transactions
43. 8806 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 527 unique users in 6911 transactions
44. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
45. 8712 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 764 unique users in 7492 transactions
46. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
47. 8668 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1068 unique users in 3752 transactions
48. 8525 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 684 unique users in 2607 transactions
49. 8517 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 336 unique users in 3418 transactions
50. 8335 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 968 unique users in 3634 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26727. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26728. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26729. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26730. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26731. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26732. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26733. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26734. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26735. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26736. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26737. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26738. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26739. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26740. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26741. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26742. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26743. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26744. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26745. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26746. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26747. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26748. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26749. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26750. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26751. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26752. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26753. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26754. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26755. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26756. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26757. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26758. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26759. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26760. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26761. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26762. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26763. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26764. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26765. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26766. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26767. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26768. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26769. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26770. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26771. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26772. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26773. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26774. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26775. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26776. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 346346 (14.42%)
Tuesday 344857 (14.36%)
Wednesday 344395 (14.34%)
Thursday 365257 (15.21%)
Friday 363345 (15.13%)
Saturday 316067 (13.16%)
Sunday 320493 (13.34%)
Total: 2400760
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
12. Post 67158126 (unedited backup) (by Peanutswar) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 08:04:25 CEST 2026) in For translation to FIL:
Panuto- Maraming mga baguhan ang paulit-ulit na nagtatanong, kaya mayroong thread na ito, sa Beginners & Help board para matulungan silang mahanap ang pinakamadaling Q&A, kahit hindi na magtanong
- Sana makatulong ang thread na ito para mabawasan ang mga tanong, kahit papaano makatulong.
- Alam kong ang ilan sa mga baguhan ay walang pakialam sa thread na ito, pero hayaan na lang natin sila.
- Ang thread na ito ay ginagawa pa rin at hindi pa kumpleto sa ngayon.
- Ito ay pansamantalang isasara para maiwasan ang spam. I-unlock lang ito pag ito ay tapos na.
Talaan ng nilalamanUsapin patungkol sa forumForum community-built toolsCommunity-led signature & avatar campaignsLibro patungkol sa Bitcoin* Downloadable links for some books are taken from [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Links can be dead anytime depends on Maus0728.Learning ResourcesWallets
13. Post 67157989 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 05:25:01 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Well. Sorry to hear about your various difficult paths, and surely there are a lot of guys who come to realize that they would have had been better to not have had gotten involved in either shitcoins or trading of bitcoin, and so a good number of those guys might end up coming around to bitcoin and then trying to stay focused on bitcoin and to stay away from either shitcoins or trading.
Yes, actually there are a lot of lots like me, who made the same mistake. The topic I created on another forum, many members acknowledged making this mistake and now I am determined not to put a single penny in alts, not even for lowering the average price so I can survive earlier, because, for instance, I can reduce the price of AVAX from 36 to 28 by averaging. I bought many coins at the wrong time. Anyway, those were the dark times haha, even if it was a great time for bitcoiners but I lost almost everything. But now it is different.
Hopefully, you have figured out how to stay away from shitcoins, yet from the totality of your message, I am wondering if you have figured it out. You seem as if you are very inclined to repeat your past mistakes.. .. so it can take time to learn, and surely there are guys who started out with shitcoins and trading and even did it for several years, maybe even longer than a whole cycle, so they end up kind of getting screwed in terms of being able to accumulate bitcoin with that money, and so guys can start to feel relieved to start to focus on bitcoin only, even though it could still take several years before they really start to feel progress and even see progress in their finances.. and of course, merely because there has been such progress historically, there had never been any guarantee of progress, even though so far in bitcoin's history these matters of accumulating bitcoin and focusing on bitcoin have worked themselves out.
I also came up with another plan that I should start accumulating gold as well but physical gold is not so safe but tokenized one is not something I like. I prefer physical but where I live, I can't hold gold at home, and I am also not going to buy a lot, I am just a student haha.
Personally, I think that gold is a BIG ASS waste of time, and if you are going to include gold, then try to make sure that it is less than 10% of the size of your bitcoin holdings.
As I said, for the comment about 4 years of experience in crypto (you made), I use my short-term memory, because if I calculate how much I have invested and then convert it into fiat, I might panic haha so I don't even check the profit or loss, just invest but I am at a point where I think I will stop now and will start investing in something else if I can manage but increasing oil and other things here are making everything harder now.
Probably better to be in bitcoin rather than crypto, and frequently, I personally suggest to people who are in the beginning stages of building their bitcoin holdings, there is nothing wrong with focusing on only bitcoin and cash. So of course the cash has to do with cashflow management and back up funds, since there frequently are needs to have funds available to deal with situations in which the income and/or expenses fluctuate, so the income might go down and the expenses go up, so then it can be good to have some cash available to deal with those situations so that you do not end up tapping into your bitcoin at a time that is not completely of your own choosing.
I personally think that guys should keep on accumulating bitcoin for 4-10 years or longer until they reach a status of enough and more than enough bitcoin, and so in that regard, bitcoin is an investment and not a trade, and really the only reason to have timelines that are less than 10 years would be based on age and/or health considerations that do not allow for being able to hold for 10 years or longer.
Of course, guys trade instead of invest, so many times they are ending up with way less bitcoin than they should have had or could have had if they had stayed focus on getting to an accumulation goal that is reasonable for their anticipated income level and/or lifestyle... in which bitcoin may well be able to either completely replace their income level or to supplement it.
Yes, it's a handy calculator. Does anyone happen to know similar calculators for other equally simple accumulation strategies (such as Value Averaging, Calendar Rebalancing, Threshold Rebalancing, etc.)? It would be great to play around with comparisons - similar to what was done in this article:
https://medium.com/rabbit-io/dca-alternatives-part-ii-d879ce44523cFor sure, lump sum can really supplement DCA, yet an overwhelming majority of situations, normal people do not have lump sum amounts available at the beginning of their investment nor at various points along their bitcoin investing path, so in that regard, DCA continues to be amongst the most powerful of strategies for normal people who only have money as it comes in.
Of course, there can be guys who might have regular income or they might even come to bitcoin with other investments that they might choose to reallocate into bitcoin. At the same time, even regular income guys might have occasions that happen around a few times a year in which either their income goes up or their expenses go down, so as a result, they end up with lump sum amounts of money that is available to them to put into bitcoin or to otherwise shore up their cashflow situation.
I frequently suggest that there are three options when the lump sum comes available or the investor makes such money available. 1) buy right away, 2) DCA and/or 3) buy on dips that may or may not end up happening. DCA tends to be the best of methods, yet getting lump sum gives options in regards to buying right away or setting some aside for buying on dips, so if a person already had a system in place for buying right around $100 per week in bitcoin, and all of a sudden he has $3k that is available. He could continue his DCA with the $100 per week and/or perhaps he could also divide the $3k into three parts of $1k each for 1) buy right away, 2) DCA and/or 3) buy on dips that might not happen.
It tends to be harder to calculate so many variables, and especially if we are considering now into the future, yet if bitmover were to put some kind of an ability to add up more than one formula into the calculator (maybe up to 3 or 4 instances), then some variability could be shown, even if there might be some short periods in which a lot of money was available, and sometimes we might not even need to have a calculator if we know a short period of time in which a lot of bitcoin was bought, then we can manually calculate such situation into our overall rendition regarding what we believed could have happened.
So let's say in your situation, you registered on the forum in October 2016, so maybe we could imagine a situation in which you front loaded your bitcoin investment in either late 2016 or even into 2017, even though BTC prices started going up so crazy in 2017, so realistically many guys did not really know for sure about what to do, so maybe some guys might have had a bit of an aggressive period in buying bitcoin, but then they got scared into either no longer buying or even worse yet selling, which may or may not have had ended up working out for them, even though we can see from the DCA calculator that even a guy who merely started buying
$100 per week in October 2016, would have had invested $52.1k by now (10 years later) and he would have had accumulated 7.263 bitcoin, which surely would not have had been a bad place to be at this point in time, even though we are looking at a straight-forward DCA approach.
By the way, with the various other approaches to buying bitcoin that you pointed out, there surely can be quite a bit of variability in terms of both how the approaches are interpreted and also based on the cashflow situation of the investor, so they would not be easy to put into a calculator, even though surely guys could calculate various points that they might do rebalancing, yet if they are fucking around with trying to time swings in the bitcoin price, it may seem on paper that they might be able to beat DCA buying, yet I have my doubts about that, since so many of those strategies get guys into a trading rather than an investing mindset.. .and investing has quite a bit of value when there is consistence, persistence, ongoing, regular and perhaps even aggressive buying rather than fucking around trying to figure out if the BTC price is up, down or sideways -even though sometimes it may well seem apparent for guys who have been buying bitcoin for a while if they might want to increase their buying during certain periods (that is if they have any extra money lying around for such purposes).
14. Post 67157654 (unedited backup) (by robelneo) (scraped on Sat Sep 19 00:59:37 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
They just used the same names. But they did not teleport
I teleported my account there, and there is a configuration, request, and approval process before they can be teleported
However, as someone already took their usernames, they would have to ask admin to rename or deleted these account so they could properly teleport now
Yes its possible to delete or change the account in the admin dashboard, and they will be notified of the changes with the new username and password. If it's intentional, they have an intention to cheat or abuse, they can be deleted by the admin, but as a forum admin myself, there is no copyright when it comes to a forum username, but the admin can create a list of usernames that cannot be registered.
This is my perspective; it's still debatable and subject to the admin's decision or to a community call.
15. Post 67157079 (unedited backup) (by Improved) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 22:12:37 CEST 2026) in Spinly.io 🎰 || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $50 Prize Pool 💰:
You can fill out the details by yourself to verify
I just did:
Giveaway ResultDo you mean everyone must fill it out every time? 40 slots?
Why not just give the link?
16. Post 67156640 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 19:44:19 CEST 2026) in Mixers to be banned:
Thank you for understanding what i wanted to say, i didn't want to be arrogant or presumptuous, i was just hazarding a hypothesis as to why the admin of the most famous bitcoin forum had decided to ban mixers and mixer advertising.
I honestly don't know why.
...because mixers are scams? Chipmixer bought a ton of advertising on bitcointalk and then
stole everyone's coins:
Even if this is true, that is not the reason for the ban.
@kruw, as usual, exaggerates outrageously. His words should not be considered reliable, because he always thinks that only his way of thinking is correct.
His claim that he "stole everyone's coins" isn't true. CM didn't
take stole a single satoshi from me.
As @Lucius says, the CM owner didn't steal the coins and disappear. The authorities confiscated them.
17. Post 67156579 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 19:27:43 CEST 2026) in Mixers to be banned:
...because mixers are scams? Chipmixer bought a ton of advertising on bitcointalk and then stole everyone's coins:
I cannot recall the full story regarding how Chipmixer was brought down but from what I can recall, it was not in the manner that you are describing. If your narrative is that Chipmixer ran a signature campaign in order to steal coins, then that seems to be patently false as there was no evidence to suggest it was either a honey trap or created with the specific intentions of stealing from those that use their services.
Even if this is true, that is not the reason for the ban.
Theymos do not ban scammers, and they let community handle them with the trust system.
After the Sinbad mixer was shutdown, theymos took action to ban mixers. I raised issues about Sinbad for around six months before it was seized:
After Chipmixer, Is Sinbad.io Next To Be Shutdown?
18. Post 67156359 (unedited backup) (by BlackHatCoiner) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 18:12:56 CEST 2026) in The list of child boards in this sub-forum needs to be updated!:
A better reason to update the child board list is that it might not be the wisest choice to use any of these wallets, besides Electrum. BitcoinJ was developed by Mike Hearn who has long abandoned Bitcoin, and IIRC went into creating a forkcoin? I don't think "Bitcoin Wallet for Android" is still an app you can download without selecting among a hundred scam-apps, and I haven't ever talked with a person who used Armory.
But it is so new, it was released just 2 years ago. I would wait the test of time before adding it. (lots of wallet fails over time)
Sparrow was released in 2020.
19. Post 67156233 (unedited backup) (by Improved) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 17:34:08 CEST 2026) in Spinly.io 🎰 || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $50 Prize Pool 💰:
Hello. There's no link to Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager results.
20. Post 67156151 (unedited backup) (by Improved) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 17:08:01 CEST 2026) in Bitz.io || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $65 Prize Pool 💰:
Winner:
23 - MuffinMaster
Winner 2:
13 - abel1337
Winner 3:
02 - knuckey
Please Dm me your Bitz.io Bitcoin deposit address.
Congratulations!
Hello.
Why didn't you publish the results? I mean the link to Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager.
If someone is disqualified then please name them and the reason of your decision.
21. Post 67154650 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 06:31:50 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Recently @JayJuanGee told me the most popular DCA calculators aren't working anymore. He suggested me to create a new one, and here it is. I think it was a nice idea, thanks JJG.
A brand new DCA-Calculator created specially for bitcointalk community
Open for suggestions and bug reports!
Great work bitmover.
My suggestion is simple as it is available on another website for DCA calculator.
https://costavg.com/You can add exchange fee % from some Tier 1 exchanges, and use it for your DCA calculator.
That site has a table for % change from start of DCA practice, net % change, and % change for each round of DCA practice.
Exchange fees can be taken from some sites.
https://exchangewar.info/https://www.cryptowisser.com/exchanges/If you can add it to your DCA site, it will make yours more informative and helpful.
Exchange fee may or may not be necessary, even though surely exchange fee tends to be a user-activated input that may account for costs that go along with each purchase, whether exchange fees or not.. and I suppose even if bitmover might not be too excited about the additional potential clutter, it could be set as a low presumption, such as 0% or 1%, which would still give the user an ability to adjust it in the event that he believes such expense is important to account for.
I hate to be too much of a dummie, but I wanted a bit of an explanation regarding the two options related to share a link. Maybe such explanation needs to go at the bottom of the tool, too?
Anyhow I think that I understand permalink - which means that the inputs are saved so that if a member clicks on the link then it comes back to the exact inputs that the member had put in and had chose to share with someone else.
What is share a link "BBCode (Forums)" and in what context would such a link or sharing of that kind of a link be used?
Of course, our own personal bitcoin performance is likely traceable by what we actually did (to the extent that we had been keeping records), and so using a DCA calculator frequently helps us to consider what we (or anyone else) might have had been able to do, if they had followed a certain level of bitcoin investment over a certain period of time.
Frequently, I will use these kinds of calculators to show some forum member where they would have had been if they had been accumulating bitcoin since their forum registration date or some other date that might be relevant to our discussion, and it frequently works quite well if we might choose to show dates that are 8 years or more into the past and to show how it could be quite difficult (at least historically) to have had been able to beat a bitcoin accumulation strategy that had involved ongoing accumulation as compared to how guys had performed who had been putting their money into trading or even into shitcoins during the same period of time.
Many guys are still struggling after 8 years or more of performance, yet a guy who had consistently put such money into bitcoin rather than into trading and/or shitcoins, would have had likely put himself into a decently good position given the amount that he had ended up investing into bitcoin and the quantity of bitcoin (or satoshis) that he had been able to accumulate over his investment timeline.
I started DCA in the last quarter of 2022, accumulated not too much due to finances and stopped accumulating at $40k in 2023 and then booked half profit at $90k and some later but still holding some of it, the profit that I sold I could not resist the feeling of holding fiat. I was so excited about the alt market that I invested and lost 90% of it, still holding those alts in the hope they will recover (I don't do leverage trading).
This has taught me a great thing, and that's how I already know how much I could still have because in 2024 my plan was to accumulate only $10k but I failed that target due to this issue but now my target is higher and I am not going to focus on anything else, alts are off book. Even on other forums I created a topic to average the prices of 12 alts that I bought with just $1k but then I said leave them as they are, let's put $1k in BTC although $1k is the minimum, I needed at least $2k.
The point was, I already know how much I would have made if I had not made that mistake, but now I learned the lesson obviously the hard way even if I read it so many times. But I did not calculate the profit I might make since the day I joined, but the day I joined, I was not involved in BTC or anything, I was blank, had no idea what crypto was, joined bounties and then started joining article campaigns through which I learned more about crypto and eventually started understanding about BTC when I came to realize I can engage in discussion here haha, long story it is but I gave you the short version. So my rule is simple, don't calculate, I use my short memory to hold as much as I can and I don't even know how much I have now, this calculator gave me a rough idea but I am sure I have more.
Well. Sorry to hear about your various difficult paths, and surely there are a lot of guys who come to realize that they would have had been better to not have had gotten involved in either shitcoins or trading of bitcoin, and so a good number of those guys might end up coming around to bitcoin and then trying to stay focused on bitcoin and to stay away from either shitcoins or trading.
Of course, with bitcoin, there can be quite a bit of value for guys to spend 4-10 years or more merely ongoingly and persistently accumulating it and without stopping and without selling any.. .but many times it can be difficult to see and even it can be difficult to get started at a later point, especially for guys like you who already have 4 years under his belt, yet still having trouble really calculating where he could have had been absent the so many mistakes that might have had to both do with stopping in accumulating.. but then yeah, a tool like a solid BTC DCA calculator (like this one that Bitmover put together) can really be empowering in terms of helping to make actual calculations of where you could have had been, and then you can use those kinds of "where I could have had been" as a comparison point to where you are at, currently.
If there is any consolation, there are a lot of guys who make such mistakes, and I am not even proclaiming that it is easy to figure out ways to become bitcoin focused, even though ongoingly it has been my hunch that staying away from shitcoins and/or trading of BTC remains the better of practices to assure ongoing, persistent, consistent and regular progress... .even though at the same time, progress is not guaranteed, even if each of us does everything correctly, there are still chances that bitcoin might not advance and/or bitcoin could end up going to zero... yet at the same time, so many of us have, over the years, tried to figure out ways that we can ongoingly invest in bitcoin in ways that are as aggressive as we are able to, without over doing it, and then to also build up our back up funds and cashflow management strength at the same time.
22. Post 67154625 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Fri Sep 18 06:00:07 CEST 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Nice reverse bart on the daily. Looks like Bitcoin is going to pick up quite nicely. What say you OGnasty? Still feelin bearish?
What I think is that pump is till 80k and price will now revert to its previous position i.e. under 65k.
#JustMyFewSatoshi
These ideas that the price has to dip are pretty retarded.
Sure they could happen, yet they become quite expensive when guys rely upon such dumps before pumps or even expect that some kind of "reasonable pullback" is required.
It may looks absurd or retard when someone talk about the DIP but its something we can't ignore.
Price is slowly going down and that is giving strength to my prediction that I made on Aug, 28 2026.
It still seems retarded to me, and I am standing by my earlier assertion, whether you end up being correct or not remains almost irrelevant...
And, of course, even if there were a bet in there, you may well continue to NOT be a betting man.
hahahahaha
I’ve been looking at the current BTC/USD structure using three indicators: the 50/200 EMA structure, RSI momentum and volume confirmation.
A few things I’m currently watching:
• **Trend:** price action relative to the 50 EMA and 200 EMA.
• **Momentum:** RSI behavior and possible divergence between price and momentum.
• **Confirmation:** whether major price movements are supported by increased volume.
I’ve also put together a more detailed breakdown of the indicator setup and methodology here:
https://pdfcloud365.com/upload/dc/6xtfv/Detailed-BTC/USD-Indicator-Analysis.pdfInterested to hear how others are reading the current structure and whether you’re watching the same levels or using different indicators.
I was not able to look at your link since it was incompatible with the Operating system that I am currently running.
I imagine your squigglies relate to the daily and not the weekly (when referring to the 50 EMA and the 200 EMA), so I will have to call you retarded too.. since it remains difficult for me to get excited about short term noise and guys who are potentially trading bitcoin rather than investing into it.
Even though you ONLY have three posts, you have been registered on this here forum for more than 7 years (since June 2019), and so if you had not been fucking around trading during that time and perhaps investing (accumulating bitcoin through buying and holding only), then perhaps
if you had invested $100 per week, then you would have had invested right around $38.2k by now and you could have had accumulated right around 1.57 BTC, and so I am not sure how fucking around with trading BTC could have had beaten those kinds of persistent buying and/or holding of BTC results.
[edited out]
Almost like the daily news that people obsess over isn’t the main price driver. Like some invisible force molds the market in a certain direction every certain time frame. Someone should look into that and maybe give it a name so it is dead simple for everyone to sell the tops and accumulate through the bottoms.
As if you know what the fuck is going on.
You are quite humorous today.
hahahahaha
#nohomo [edited out]
Yes, those of us who believe in the mysterious time driven force consider 2026 an accumulation year after 2025 was a sell year. 2027 will also be an accumulation year. 2028 will be for holding or final purchases in the cycle. 2029 I will be reminding everyone of what happened in 2013, 2017, 2021, & 2025 and hearing how "this time is different" once again while dodging insults for the following 18 months. Personally, I am looking forward to rejoining team bull around Halloween as is my MO so hopefully the emotionally driven folks are a little nicer to the messenger when they like the message.
Just imagine if you had not been so retarded between June 2011 and early 2013 and perhaps even extending into 2018?
It would have had been amazing, and you would not have had needed to be fucking around trying to trade nonsense and to act like you know everything since you could have had easily had enough or more than enough bitcoin so that you would not have had to be fucking around with trying to trade - and perhaps with mediocre amounts too.
Do I need to go through the numbers again?
Probably not for you, but if anyone wants me to go through the numbers, I could lay out some relatively modest scenario to make the point that OgNasty remains a retard who wishes that he wasn't such. Accordingly, he is largely trying to make up for his historical retardedness (without even having to go into some of his other sorted forum history) by ongoingly spouting out how much more that he knows as compared to all other forum members and perhaps everyone else in the world too. He surely is amazing, at least in his own mind.
23. Post 67153168 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 19:07:02 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Of course, our own personal bitcoin performance is likely traceable by what we actually did (to the extent that we had been keeping records), and so using a DCA calculator frequently helps us to consider what we (or anyone else) might have had been able to do, if they had followed a certain level of bitcoin investment over a certain period of time.
Frequently, I will use these kinds of calculators to show some forum member where they would have had been if they had been accumulating bitcoin since their forum registration date or some other date that might be relevant to our discussion, and it frequently works quite well if we might choose to show dates that are 8 years or more into the past and to show how it could be quite difficult (at least historically) to have had been able to beat a bitcoin accumulation strategy that had involved ongoing accumulation as compared to how guys had performed who had been putting their money into trading or even into shitcoins during the same period of time.
Many guys are still struggling after 8 years or more of performance, yet a guy who had consistently put such money into bitcoin rather than into trading and/or shitcoins, would have had likely put himself into a decently good position given the amount that he had ended up investing into bitcoin and the quantity of bitcoin (or satoshis) that he had been able to accumulate over his investment timeline.
I started DCA in the last quarter of 2022, accumulated not too much due to finances and stopped accumulating at $40k in 2023 and then booked half profit at $90k and some later but still holding some of it, the profit that I sold I could not resist the feeling of holding fiat. I was so excited about the alt market that I invested and lost 90% of it, still holding those alts in the hope they will recover (I don't do leverage trading).
This has taught me a great thing, and that's how I already know how much I could still have because in 2024 my plan was to accumulate only $10k but I failed that target due to this issue but now my target is higher and I am not going to focus on anything else, alts are off book. Even on other forums I created a topic to average the prices of 12 alts that I bought with just $1k but then I said leave them as they are, let's put $1k in BTC although $1k is the minimum, I needed at least $2k.
The point was, I already know how much I would have made if I had not made that mistake, but now I learned the lesson obviously the hard way even if I read it so many times. But I did not calculate the profit I might make since the day I joined, but the day I joined, I was not involved in BTC or anything, I was blank, had no idea what crypto was, joined bounties and then started joining article campaigns through which I learned more about crypto and eventually started understanding about BTC when I came to realize I can engage in discussion here haha, long story it is but I gave you the short version. So my rule is simple, don't calculate, I use my short memory to hold as much as I can and I don't even know how much I have now, this calculator gave me a rough idea but I am sure I have more.
I think this is not a bug. If you set the frequency to week, when you change the day the numbers shouldn't change. Only if you change more than 7 days.
Understood.
24. Post 67153013 (unedited backup) (by arallmuus) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 18:20:25 CEST 2026) in 🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵:
I was able to create an account without any phone number using MetaMask wallet. Very good.
Good to hear that
I just made a $25 bet here:
So I've been reading on this thread lately about their free bets and the winning amount came back as full amount including the stake as well. Now this just make sense to me, instead of free bets I think its closer to straight cash bonus with 1x rollover which is why when you win the full amount including the stakes are back onto the balance
Normally free bets wont show up as balance so yeah this is straight cash with rollover which is even better than free bets. I hope you win your bet though, hard to imagine City will lose
25. Post 67152391 (unedited backup) (by arallmuus) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 15:05:31 CEST 2026) in 🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵:
Hello guys.
I am trying to create an account at 1win, but it keeps asking me for a phone number.
Is it possible to create an account without phone number? maybe using metamask or some other wallets? Anyone tried?
Yes, click login instead of registration then this will pop out
Got a good odds sweet here but close to Brighton like roughly 4.62~
Pregame odds was that high? dang and we lost after 2 goals lead, imagine how high it would have been after Brighton trailed by 2 goals
26. Post 67151897 (unedited backup) (by 1win.global) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 11:46:26 CEST 2026) in 🏅 1win.com | Man United & Man City - 13 September ⚽️ $50:
Congratulations to Fakhrulenclix and bitmover on the win! 🎉
The match ended with a 0:1 victory for Man City, with the first goal scored in the 60th minute. Thank you to everyone who took part, shared their predictions, and stayed with us. There are more exciting matches and new winners ahead!⚽️
Time: 59'
Time: 53
27. Post 67151764 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 10:51:43 CEST 2026) in Ledger has been hit with a class‑action lawsuit for $500,000,000 :
claims are gaining credibility. Initially I thought it was due to a data leak and its use in social attacks and phishing, but they managed to access a former employee's account, and Ledger didn't properly revoke the former employee's access after their employment ended. The damage was caused by Ledger's negligence, not just the data leak.
This is more serious than just a data leak.
Basically every company out there had suffered some data leak, even governments. If some judge decides to punish just a data leak, all big companies in the world would be facing similar actions.
However, a cybersecurity company that does not properly revoking access from former employee is much serious. Lets see how this goes.
FWIW, there are few cases where a company fined due to data leak. For example,
On November 25, 2022, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (“DPC”) released a decision fining Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) €265 million for a 2019 data leak involving the personal information of approximately 533 million Facebook users worldwide.
In the decision, the DPC argued that Meta failed to comply with the GDPR’s requirement of providing privacy “by design and default” when it failed to prevent the disclosure of users’ phone numbers, email addresses, full names, dates of birth and other personal information on an online hacking forum. The leak was a result of a hacking group exploiting a weakness in Facebook’s data processing measures to scrape public profiles and connect user profiles with email addresses.
It's probably small amount for Meta, but it could happen to other company, especially if they operate in EU.
28. Post 67151384 (unedited backup) (by atookz) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 07:15:25 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Actually, I'm very impressed with this tool! It's actively maintained, and keeps shipping updates based on feedback (end date, caching problem, etc) almost in real time. I also love it because it's beginner-friendly but not so dumbed-down that it skips the opportunity to go deeper for those who want to dig further into the numbers.
If I may, I'd like to offer a few suggestions, hopefully it will help:
Sats-based DCA. Currently, everything is fiat-based (inputs like $100/week). It would be nice if users could set it using sats too (for instance "buy 100k sats/week") as many of us now think in sats, not dollars.
Drawdown statistics. Besides indicating the final profit/loss, it would also be very useful to be able to see the maximum drawdown during the DCA period. I mean how far into the red did the portfolio go? That kind of number gives a much more honest picture of what it truly takes (mentally) to stick with DCA long-term, rather than the happy ending number.
Multi-currency support. Since this forum is rather international, calculating in EUR, IDR or any other currency (not just USD) might make it much more useful for non-US people who want the numbers to actually relate to their own situation.
Oh by the way, great work, bitmover. This is a solid addition to the community's toolkit
29. Post 67151250 (unedited backup) (by UchihaSarada) (scraped on Thu Sep 17 05:12:56 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Recently @JayJuanGee told me the most popular DCA calculators aren't working anymore. He suggested me to create a new one, and here it is. I think it was a nice idea, thanks JJG.
A brand new DCA-Calculator created specially for bitcointalk community
Open for suggestions and bug reports!
Great work bitmover.
My suggestion is simple as it is available on another website for DCA calculator.
https://costavg.com/You can add exchange fee % from some Tier 1 exchanges, and use it for your DCA calculator.
That site has a table for % change from start of DCA practice, net % change, and % change for each round of DCA practice.
Exchange fees can be taken from some sites.
https://exchangewar.info/https://www.cryptowisser.com/exchanges/If you can add it to your DCA site, it will make yours more informative and helpful.
30. Post 67150620 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 22:59:19 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Hey, you just decided to improve your site. An interesting tool.
I think it would be a good idea for you to try sometimes to share it on Reddit in the appropriate sub.
Probably forgot to add a link to the page in the navigation menu at the top.
I am also visiting the site after some time, and now it looks better. I don't even know what has changed because it seems new to me. I was not even aware of some tools already being there.
The issue you are seeing is not universal, because I can see the DCA tool listed in this tab. But thanks for reporting bro, it shows this also can exist.
Frequently, I will use these kinds of calculators to show some forum member where they would have had been if they had been accumulating bitcoin since their forum registration date or some other date that might be relevant to our discussion,
to have had been able to beat a bitcoin accumulation strategy that had involved ongoing accumulation as compared to how guys had performed who had been putting their money into trading or even into shitcoins during the same period of time.
I can imagine one thing about how long it must have taken the OP to make this tool just to help people realize who were or might still be investing in alts and other useless things instead of Bitcoin, thinking they lost the time, but they have not.
There is still time, and what they could have made if they had done these calculations a long time ago.
Thanks for introducing this tool bitmover and thanks to you JJG, for recommending him.
31. Post 67150587 (unedited backup) (by Grease5000) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 22:48:43 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
This is actually useful for the community. A working DCA calculator will makes it easier for people to understand how consistent buying could have performed over time, without relying on guesswork.
I encourage members to test the calculator with different DCA amounts and time periods, share their findings, and point out anything that could be improved. Because tools like this become more valuable when the community actively tests and improves them. Nice work, and credit to JJG for the idea.
32. Post 67150345 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 21:21:44 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Thank you. I didnt understand your point. Did you notice some bug when the frequency is not Daily? Can you be more specific?
I think what he means is, when you choose the duration, like from the start date to the end date, and if we keep the end date as of today, and start date from this week, like I chose in the image, the numbers don't change at all if the frequency is set to week. Unless we change it to daily, and then the results change.
So it can be a bug, depends on how you see it, and what can be the possible solution for this? Maybe you can enforce us to not select a date from the same week when we have set the frequency to week. Same goes for month.
Yeah… that was it, same thing happens when both start and end date is set to the current date [i.e today], switching the frequency to bi weekly and monthly also does same.
BUT it doesn’t really affect much like I mentioned, since most users will select a wide range..it could only be a thing when they do that mistakenly and end up getting stuck .
33. Post 67150325 (unedited backup) (by macson) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 21:14:19 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Thanks to Bitmover for being able to develop the site. It's quite helpful to simulate how DCA performs over time. So people no longer have to calculate manually --- just enter the amount of money and the date they want, and it's calculated automatically. The results are also super fast. +1
34. Post 67150261 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 20:54:13 CEST 2026) in Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?:
I find investors using the DCA strategy invest for the long term.
Special Considerations Should Beginners Follow the DCA Method for Bitcoin Investments? What Can Be the Outcome -Future
DCA Bitcoin is such a well‑known and relevant method that, despite its simplicity, it is constantly discussed both on the forum and beyond. People are creating DCA calculators that base their calculations on a strategy, and they are designed to help young investors predict their profits.
For example, bitmover has even recently released a new calculator that conveniently allows you to calculate earnings using DCA and determine how much Bitcoin will accumulate if you regularly set aside money to buy Bitcoin. And it’s funny that, despite the simplicity of the DCA method, not all experienced investors use it.
Here's the link to the new BTC DCA Calculator by Bitmover.
https://bitcoindata.science/dca-calculator
35. Post 67150219 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 20:38:07 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Thank you. I didnt understand your point. Did you notice some bug when the frequency is not Daily? Can you be more specific?
I think what he means is, when you choose the duration, like from the start date to the end date, and if we keep the end date as of today, and start date from this week, like I chose in the image, the numbers don't change at all if the frequency is set to week. Unless we change it to daily, and then the results change.
So it can be a bug, depends on how you see it, and what can be the possible solution for this? Maybe you can enforce us to not select a date from the same week when we have set the frequency to week. Same goes for month.
Or whatever solution, suits best for you.
I loved the site, TBH I don't usually use these calculators. I don't even want to calculate how much I have accumulated. I am just accumulating because I don't want to waste money haha so I just put it in btc and not think of it. I don't calculate the profit or loss, but this tool is good. Like, it gave me an idea of how much I might have invested, but as Promise suggested in the first post, maybe another option where we can choose the future price over time. And then we can see at this price, let's say $250k, how much we could earn.
This can increase the bounce rate as well.
36. Post 67150005 (unedited backup) (by hedgeh0g) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 19:16:07 CEST 2026) in Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?:
I find investors using the DCA strategy invest for the long term.
Special Considerations Should Beginners Follow the DCA Method for Bitcoin Investments? What Can Be the Outcome -Future
DCA Bitcoin is such a well‑known and relevant method that, despite its simplicity, it is constantly discussed both on the forum and beyond. People are creating DCA calculators that base their calculations on a strategy, and they are designed to help young investors predict their profits.
For example, bitmover has even recently released a new calculator that conveniently allows you to calculate earnings using DCA and determine how much Bitcoin will accumulate if you regularly set aside money to buy Bitcoin. And it’s funny that, despite the simplicity of the DCA method, not all experienced investors use it.
37. Post 67149920 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 18:45:31 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
I think that the calculator should have both a start date and an end date - otherwise the tool is assuming BTC DCA accumulation from the start date until present, yet there might be some guys who accumulated (or could have accumulated) bitcoin within a timeline such as $100 per week between January 2016 until January 2021.
Another thing is that if you want to be really fancy, and offer some feature(s) that no other BTC DCA calculator has so far offered (to my knowledge) is to have the ability of the user to calculate more than one timeline of BTC accumulation.
This one works too.. by default it will just retain the current date [as end-date], which can be easily changed instead of fixed current date as end-date.
For multiple timelines, permit me to suggest a different “advance” section on same page or maybe two pages now, while still maintaining the current simple to navigate implementation because some visitors see extra features as complicated..
DCA tends to reflect the past rather than the future, yet bitmover might want to be creative in terms of some kind of a future projection tool, and surely the JJG fuck you status chart that is almost ready to come out could provide a bit of a vehicle for such future projection. Perhaps?
That’s true..
JJG fuck you status it is, then.
38. Post 67149772 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 17:53:37 CEST 2026) in [TOOL] DCA Bitcoin Calculator:
Thanks Bitmover. I like it. It might be good to have a name, such as the Bitmover Bitcoin DCA Calculator
I think that it should have both a start date and an end date - otherwise the tool is assuming BTC DCA accumulation until present, yet there might be some guys who accumulated (or could have accumulated) bitcoin within a timeline such as $100 per week between January 2016 until January 2021.
Another thing is that if you want to be really fancy, and offer some feature(s) that no other BTC DCA calculator has so far offered (to my knowledge) is to have the ability of the user to calculate more than one timeline of BTC accumulation.
So for example the guy has three different kinds of accumulation and had changes in his budget. He did something like this:
1) $10 per week between January 2014 until December 2015
+
2) $50 per week between January 2016 until April 2020
+
3) $150 per week between May 2020 until present
Does this above guy have enough BTC after more than 12 years of BTC accumulation? Sure, he can see that he had started out in his bitcoin investment in a whimpy way, but with the passage of time, he became more aggressive, even though the bitcoin that he was buying were costing him more and more in dollar terms.
Maybe the guy could better assess if he has enough BTC (or more than enough BTC?) if he had a link to JJG's sustainable withdrawal tool or to JJG's fuck you status chart so that such guy might be able to figure out if he has enough bitcoin to support his targeted income level, or if he might have a target amount of BTC (in terms of dollar value) that he would like to reach in the future (if he had not quite made it) in order to feel that he could start to sustainably withdraw BTC in the future?
39. Post 67149060 (unedited backup) (by Agbe) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 13:24:38 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
@BlackHatCoiner @GazetaBitcoin, I suggest you take a look and teleport your account (so nobody willbe able to use your name there again)
If BlackHatCoiner and GazetaBitcoin were not the ones behind those accounts in altcoinstalks and they don't want to create account there and don't want to teleport. They can make comments here so people will know that they are not the ones behind the accounts. Because I don't really believe that they are the ones own those accounts. There is no way these users create accounts there and will not discuss with others and only interested to participate in raffles.
And if they are not the ones, then newbies from here or someone that knows them from here created those accounts there. Though they are two different forum but their input here can save a lot of doubts. And anything happens to those accounts there will not affect their reputation here. They don't need to teleport but their input here means a lot. It can be yes or no. Yes we are the ones or no we are not the ones behind those usernames there.
40. Post 67148658 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 10:47:49 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
Problems only exist if people use those nicknames to impersonate anyone else. If there is nothing like that, I see no problem.
Prohibit anyone to use a specific nickname is unfair, and you can imagine as well as expand to a bigger scale like there are many forums, not only Bitcointalk.org or altcoinstalks.com. Don't only limit to these two forums and think like if two members in two forums have a same username, person behind those accounts is one person, or one account is an impersonating.
Well, I have explained myself in that post already. But allow me to repeat myself.
If it's like a common name, I don't see any problem. This is one of the reasons people use a nickname/username for their online presence. If you search on the internet, you probably won't find many accounts if you search with the username LoyceV, theymos, or bitmover, etc. It's because these are not real names like John Doe.
I think Altcoinstalks is now very close to the Bitcointalk community. It happened after the mixer ban. All the mixers moved to Altcoinstalks, and the campaign managers moved the campaigns there. The forum members joined there as well. It's not like those people never knew that usernames like GazetaBitcoin exist. Even if it is not forbidden to copy someone else's username, it's not legit either. I consider this shady as fuck.
41. Post 67148252 (unedited backup) (by Darker45) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 07:07:02 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
If i see more users I will add them here. There are probably more abuse
Ive seen this
User had the same username of a prominent forum member here but without a
teleported tagged but its not active anymore. Also checked the post history and the last posts was used in some giveaways.
The user stats also shown been active on Nigeria Local section, but Im pretty know that the user with that username here came from our local Philippines. So clearly a different user from the one there on ALTT. Though the altcoinstalk account isnt active anymore. If @Darker45 decided to teleport his account on the alt forum. What will happened on the nigerian account? Will it be deleted?
Thanks for the mention, although I don't think I'm a prominent member here. In which case, I'm not at all bothered by having somebody else sharing the same username as mine on a separate platform, inactive at that.
To my mind, that's not even necessarily impersonation. Sans proof of any intention to take advantage of anything by pretending that he/she's the same user on this forum, that could even be brushed off as simple coincidence, as it's highly likely the same username also exists in other platforms.
42. Post 67148089 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 03:43:43 CEST 2026) in Rede Liquid do Bitcoin hackeada em 4000 BITCOINS:
Esses dias ouvi uma ótima entrevista com o criador da Ruby on Rails , o DHH. Ele é um programador mundialmente conhecido e estava falando sobre programação com IA. Ele disse que quase nao escreve mais código.
Isso chegou pra ficar mesmo, mas tem que saber usar.
Sim!!!
Te falo por experiência própria, na minha empresa já estamos usando uma IA na intranet para auxiliar na programação à mais de um mês e tem ajudado "pacacete"....
Por mais que você tenha um código bem estruturado, orientado À objetos, com reuso e padrões de projetos bem definidos, sempre tem muito serviço braçal que a IA ajuda demais.
Ela também é otima para criar casos de testes, validações de novas implementações, análises de métodos desconhecidos (feitos por outros devs e sem documentação
)... é outro mundo.
Mas.... é "nada raro" você pedir pra ela fazer ABC e derrepente ela faz ABCD mesmo tu tendo dito anteriormente pra não fazer isso.... ela tem vida própria! Tem que olhar tudo oque ela escreve e dev preguiçoso não faz isso, o importante as vezes é ver aquilo que foi pedido funcionando... o resultado só um bom dev sabe qual pode ser.
43. Post 67148071 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Sep 16 03:33:49 CEST 2026) in Proteja sua conta! Post seu endereço.:
Curiosamente, estou tendo uma quantidade muito alem do esperado de acessos. Orgânicos pelo bing e duckduckgo principalmente
Acredito que estava faltando uma ferramenta desse tipo.
Uma vez tinha mais ferramentas pra isso, hoje em dia tá complicado de encontrar, e como seu site já deve ter uma boa indexação, então é natural que apareça esse tráfego de outros sites além do bitcointalk.
Por falar no seu BUMP, estive procurando aqui e nã oencontrei mais o endereço que usei na época para fazer a minha verificação, apesar de provavelmente poder fazer a verificação com a wallet que uso em campanha (toc toc na madeira, me livrem do mal de precisar disso algum dia), é muito mais rápido e menos burocrático se tiver a verificação de mensagem assinada... vou atualizar!
44. Post 67147327 (unedited backup) (by notblox1) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 22:14:25 CEST 2026) in l0tt0.com:
I see more changes and updates on l0tt0 website, and it is good to have mobile version released.
Having real Roulette now is great and I am going to test it and post my feedback later.
Dark theme is looking very good.
I will keep trying a 500x win again, which I got long ago
This doesnt happen very often, but good luck trying
45. Post 67147225 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 21:46:19 CEST 2026) in Proteja sua conta! Post seu endereço.:
Acredito que estava faltando uma ferramenta desse tipo.
A sua esta simples e intuitiva.
As que eu já vi por ai, são bem complexas com anúncios e um aspeto meio duvidoso. Por isso, acho que já esta num nível bem acima.
46. Post 67146100 (unedited backup) (by cryptoaddictchie) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 16:22:01 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
If i see more users I will add them here. There are probably more abuse
Ive seen this
User had the same username of a prominent forum member here but without a
teleported tagged but its not active anymore. Also checked the post history and the last posts was used in some giveaways.
The user stats also shown been active on Nigeria Local section, but Im pretty know that the user with that username here came from our local Philippines. So clearly a different user from the one here. Though the altcoinstalk account isnt active anymore. If @Darker45 decided to teleport his account on the alt forum. What will happened on the nigerian account? Will it be deleted?
47. Post 67146051 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 16:04:37 CEST 2026) in Rede Liquid do Bitcoin hackeada em 4000 BITCOINS:
É preciso considerar que é um erro que colocou em risco 4000 BTC e que literalmente é uma situação de colocar a empresa em falência caso não fosse devolvido. Então, na minha visão, é algo totalmente diferente do que é praticado em Bounty comum. Quantas empresas conseguem ir a falência apenas por um erro? Quanto valeria um erro que faz com que todo o saldo guardado em um banco seja retirado por um hacker?
Isso é mesmo
Uma falha grave causa vazamentos de dados mas a empresa ainda funciona e mantém o dinheiro, esse hack é como se roubassem todo o saldo do banco do paypal e todos os clientes que tem dinheiro ficassem com $0 sem chance de recuperar a menos que a empresa gaste milhões
Ta ai um mal uso da IA
Esses dias ouvi uma ótima entrevista com o criador da Ruby on Rails , o DHH. Ele é um programador mundialmente conhecido e estava falando sobre programação com IA. Ele disse que quase nao escreve mais código.
Isso chegou pra ficar mesmo, mas tem que saber usar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYFGCESmikAEu acho que quem sabe programar e usa IA vai ter muito sucesso, mas o problema é não saber nada e usar IA sem entender se tem falhas no código e sem entender o que está sendo escrito
Eu estou estudando para usar IA, não vou fazer sem entender um pouco do assunto pois tenho essa preocupação de segurança
48. Post 67145605 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 13:23:31 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
I suggest you take a look and teleport your account (so nobody willbe able to use your name there again)
This sounds like it was created to force users from Bitcointalk to create an account on an insignificant altcoin forum.
If someone falls for a username on a different forum, they can't be helped.
I'm not going to create an account to prevent someone else from using my name, if I'd start that, there are millions more sites to register on.The mentioned accounts primarily only participated in free raffles and bounty contests. It may be tricky, in order to trick the manager into accepting them when he sees known usernames. I guess they expect that when there is a large number of applications that the manager will not check in more detail.
49. Post 67145595 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 13:21:13 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Is it possible to add a delete button just after image upload.??
As soon as you see the page with the image link, just go to the droplist and choose the link to delete the image.
Follow this link and the image will be deleted.
I just noticed some of those links are greyed out! Why is that?
I understood the other 3, but what are Frame and Medium links supposed to be?
50. Post 67145525 (unedited backup) (by JeromeTash) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 12:51:49 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
They could not fake the activity score because a legit teleported account start at higher activity score. They were simply registering new account under the nickname of some reputable user on this forum that hasnt teleported their account ( 2 nickname spotted by bitmover )
So far all of those account's post were on bitcoin price prediction thread but its always better to be safe than sorry. God knows when they will start 'scamming' under those reputable nickname
Okay, got it. Thanks for clearing this up. What actually confused me was the points thingy
. On a closer look I noticed that both accounts amassed over 2000 points, yet their activity is still low. How does this work over there? Is it an equivalent of merits in this forum?
51. Post 67145357 (unedited backup) (by Decimetre) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 11:34:31 CEST 2026) in Stake your Bitcoin address here:
I verified here.
Verified ✅But this is not how we usually do here. You should post your message like this
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is real Decimetre on Bitcointalk
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qrqlghmnt44m8fldnvx9p80r24n3k0zndrmz5ly
KOYiwS9Uh5B0prYTj6Eo+AXDK6WKa0iyyrH6tYp7eRj/M+wYu2ng1TG/qMBJdVhUdc6NqxCeJriYZqG5FjnfG90=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thanks for the correction and verification. I just learned how to do that. I don't know if it's still necessary again but here it is;
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is real Decimetre on Bitcointalk
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qrqlghmnt44m8fldnvx9p80r24n3k0zndrmz5ly
KOYiwS9Uh5B0prYTj6Eo+AXDK6WKa0iyyrH6tYp7eRj/M+wYu2ng1TG/qMBJdVhUdc6NqxCeJriYZqG5FjnfG90=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
52. Post 67145348 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 11:29:37 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
I suggest you take a look and teleport your account (so nobody willbe able to use your name there again)
This sounds like it was created to force users from Bitcointalk to create an account on an insignificant altcoin forum.
If someone falls for a username on a different forum, they can't be helped.
53. Post 67145051 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 09:23:02 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
However, as someone already took their usernames, they would have to ask admin to rename or deleted these account so they could properly teleport now
I do not think this is fair. It is true that there is a similarity in usernames, but that is not enough to prove that they impersonated BTT accounts.
It might be better if ALTT admin added a special tag for such accounts.
54. Post 67144739 (unedited backup) (by notocactus) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 05:38:14 CEST 2026) in Why can a Bitcoin transaction stay unconfirmed even with a higher fee?:
Previously. I believed that if you pay a higher fee on the transaction to Bitcoin it was almost certain that it would be confirmed quickly, but it's not this simple.
Quick or slow, it depends on the fee rate you use for broadcasting your transaction, whether the used fee rate is on tip of Bitcoin mempools. Additionally, another factor is whether your transaction fee is also higher than other transactions with same fee rate but have lower transaction fees.
Or look into the fee market and mempool?
There is nothing like fee market but there are Bitcoin mempools and there are sites for observing Bitcoin mempools.
Mempool Observing toolsDo you typically use RBF to offer a higher fee for transactions if they take longer to become confirmed or do you just wait for a transaction to get confirmed?
Most good non-custodial wallets have opt-in RBF, so except you disable RBF, your transactions will always are RBF and you can bump the fee later.
Otherwise, you can have another option, that is less convenient, it is Child Pay For Parents CPFP.
[Guide] Use CPFP if your stucked transactions from blockchain.com wallet[TUTORIAL] Getting a low-fee transaction unstuck by creating a CPFP with Electrum.All about transaction fees in Electrum.Minimize your transaction fee with Electrum wallet.
55. Post 67144599 (unedited backup) (by vapourminer) (scraped on Tue Sep 15 02:29:14 CEST 2026) in JJG's Bitcoin Investment Ideas (Sustainable Withdrawal / Portfolio Maintenance):
[...] our new tool, "fuck you status"
i have no idea what that tool may or may not be but im all in already
56. Post 67143675 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 20:56:25 CEST 2026) in Test - do not delete please:
♻️
CavemanSwap is a non-custodial, no-account cryptocurrency exchange designed for simple and private swaps. Operating with a No-Js minimalist, caveman-themed design, the platform allows users to trade supported cryptocurrencies (such as BTC, ETH, XMR, LTC, BCH, and USDT) without requiring JavaScript, user registration, cookies, or personal identification. CavemanSwap is presenting a free raffle for the community.
Prize
1st: $25
2nd: $15
3rd: $10
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
⚡ Three winners will
share $50 in Bitcoin* ⚡ Reward will be sent to your Bitcoin wallet.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ God Of Thunder and
CavemanSwap reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format:Slot number:
bech32 address:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
57. Post 67143517 (unedited backup) (by Sandra_hakeem) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 19:59:38 CEST 2026) in accounts of this forum are being impersonated in altcoinstalks :
I noticed some users are being impersonated in another forum to join some giveaways.
@BlackHatCoiner @GazetaBitcoin, I suggest you take a look and teleport your account (so nobody willbe able to use your name there again)
I created a topic about it
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=349676.msg2245690#msg2245690If i see more users I will add them here. There are probably more abuse
First of all, I just checked and the two accounts are under review so kudos to the admins on Att for that quick response.
I also want to add that the users behind this gruesome attempt to abuse a user's reputation are still part of this forum, and they have observed for a long time that either those reputable members have not yet teleported their accounts, or just don't have any interest to do so.
58. Post 67143392 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 19:28:02 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Is it possible to add a delete button just after image upload.??
As soon as you see the page with the image link, just go to the droplist and choose the link to delete the image.
Follow this link and the image will be deleted.
59. Post 67143254 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 18:57:13 CEST 2026) in [ANN] Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager:
An image similar to this:
Something like that. But with the URL to the results page under it.
But with the winners and the chosen block.?
Yes.
So:
before the block is mined:
6 blocks before the results
after the block is mined:
Winners:
1. Satoshi
2. ....
3. ....
60. Post 67142652 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 16:14:07 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Is it possible to add a delete button just after image upload.??
Didn't it have that feature when it was just launched? I remember seeing it.
61. Post 67142587 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 15:57:43 CEST 2026) in [ANN] Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager:
Can I give you more work?
How cool would it be if that "button" was an image, and the image showed information (Shift-Reload required) that counts down until the desired Bitcoin block, and after that shows the Results in the image?
62. Post 67140886 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 23:57:19 CEST 2026) in Priamex ♻️ FREE raffle #7 welcome round | Prize pool $30, Winner takes all!:
Sad to see only one entry in this round.
Let's go with the block height 966870
Unfortunately there are no winners.
Verify.
63. Post 67140654 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 22:45:13 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :
[edited out]
I would recommend at least two steps: using an hardware wallet that hasn’t been using subpar practice, this mean avoid ledger, at least, and using one that supports your own entropy to generate the seed, via dice rolling, for example.
This, before moving to a multivendor, multi sign setup.
I have seen a lot of folks jumping into the promotion of multi-signature, multi-vendor and/or various forms of collaborative custody, which I find to be potentially overly complicated.
And, yeah, perhaps many of us have lost a decent amount of confidence regarding the ways that seeds have been generated, so then there are some kinds of hardware wallets that allow us to add our own entropy. I also have gained confidence in the use of passphrases, so I think that a passphrase that is at least 12 characters of numbers, letters, capital and symbols would likely provide enough difficulty to make it quite secure, and sure you could add several more characters if you want a bit more difficulty in your passphrase.
...A long and complex passphrase is still non-hackable with today's technology. If a Coldcard-generated seed was additionally protected with a complex passphrase, the BTC would probably not be among the +1500 coins that got stolen. Some 2 and 3-word passphrases got bruteforced. An 8-word passphrase wouldn't be. An 8-word passphrase with numbers, lowercase & uppercase letters, and special characters even less so.
These are two different things and in one case your bitcoin are at risk (like here with coldcard scam...) :
-passphrase or password (bip38) would not help you at all.
Of course a passphrase would have had helped, and it is almost impossible to break into a passphrase that has 12 characters or more that are combined with numbers, letters, upper case and characters.
A custom password used to encrypt and lock a single Bitcoin private key into a secure 58-character string
-extra-word or bip39 (that is not a password but literally part of the seed) yes it's an extra word and not the password it would be used.
Yes a very long string could help but at this point I don't see any reason to have those risks and rely on a third party for a seed generation.
If you choose a sufficiently complex passphrase of 12 characters or more, you have a lot of protections, so I don't see why you are proclaiming such efforts to be futile.
By the way, if I thought that my initial 12 seed words were vulnerable, then surely I would regenerate them and not stick with ONLY the passphrase as a protection, so surely it is better to have the 12-24 seedwords and the passphrase also rather than merely relying on one of them.
In the end a passphrase must be stored like apart of the seed, adding some complexity.
For sure, it is way simpler than a multisig, with all the required seed conservation isssues.
I am not sure the larger part of the self custody community is ready for that. I have doubt on myself included.
64. Post 67140231 (unedited backup) (by Crypto Library) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 20:15:13 CEST 2026) in [Userscript] Automatically Converts copy/pasted URLs to [url=...]Text[/url]:
I was going to suggest using CTRL+SHIFT+V or CTRL+ALT+V for the url with the bbcode. Or even a new paste button in the forum page.
But you already solved slightly different
I would also going to suggest this in this case, because sometimes I had to face problems due to direct CTRL+V, many times, when I wanted to give the direct links, I had to remove BBCode Tags like
... again manually.
So I think this CTRL+SHIFT+V option is better than Url formatter on/off button.
Anyway, what else can I suggest, since now the artificial intelligence era
so I customized the PX-Z script through chatgpt. Hope this will be helpful.
// ==UserScript==
// @name Bitcointalk Paste URL Formatter
// @namespace https://bitcointalk.org/
// @version 1.4
// @description Formats pasted URLs as [url=URL]change_text[/url] BBCode using Ctrl+Shift+V. Works with highlighted/selected text. Press Ctrl+Shift+U to enable or disable.
// @match https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post*
// @grant none
// @author PX-Z
// @license MIT
// ==/UserScript==
(function () {
'use strict';
function addStyles() {
const style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = `
#url_formatter_note_text {
padding: 3px 15px;
border: 1px solid #e2cf6b;
background: #fffbe4;
}
#url_formatter_toggle {
margin-left: 8px;
}
`;
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
let enabled = true;
// Used to detect Ctrl+Shift+V before the paste event
let formatterPaste = false;
// Update the note text
function updateNote() {
const noteText = document.querySelector('#url_formatter_note_text');
if (!noteText) {
return;
}
noteText.innerHTML = enabled
? 'Note: URL Formatter is ON. Press Ctrl+Shift+V to format URL. Or click <a href="#" id="url_formatter_toggle">Disable</a>'
: 'Note: URL Formatter is OFF. Press Ctrl+Shift+U to enable. Or click <a href="#" id="url_formatter_toggle">Enable</a>';
const toggle = document.querySelector('#url_formatter_toggle');
if (toggle) {
toggle.addEventListener('click', function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
updateNote();
});
}
}
// Add note after #lock_warning
function addNote() {
const lockWarning = document.querySelector('#lock_warning');
if (!lockWarning) {
return;
}
// Prevent duplicate note
if (document.querySelector('#url_formatter_note')) {
return;
}
const noteRow = document.createElement('tr');
noteRow.id = 'url_formatter_note';
noteRow.innerHTML = `
<td></td>
<td align="left">
<span id="url_formatter_note_text"></span>
</td>
`;
lockWarning.insertAdjacentElement('afterend', noteRow);
updateNote();
}
// Keyboard shortcuts
document.addEventListener('keydown', function (e) {
// Ctrl + Shift + U = Enable / Disable Formatter
if (
e.ctrlKey &&
e.shiftKey &&
e.key.toLowerCase() === 'u'
) {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
updateNote();
return;
}
// Ctrl + Shift + V = Special URL Formatter Paste
if (
e.ctrlKey &&
e.shiftKey &&
e.key.toLowerCase() === 'v'
) {
formatterPaste = true;
}
});
// Reset formatterPaste if Ctrl+Shift+V is not followed by paste
document.addEventListener('keyup', function (e) {
if (e.key.toLowerCase() === 'v') {
setTimeout(function () {
formatterPaste = false;
}, 100);
}
});
// Handle paste
document.addEventListener('paste', function (e) {
// Only process Ctrl + Shift + V
if (!formatterPaste) {
return;
}
// Reset immediately
formatterPaste = false;
// Do nothing when disabled
if (!enabled) {
return;
}
const target = e.target;
// Only handle textareas
if (!(target instanceof HTMLTextAreaElement)) {
return;
}
const text = e.clipboardData.getData('text/plain').trim();
// Only process a single HTTP/HTTPS URL
if (!/^https?:\/\/\S+$/i.test(text)) {
return;
}
// Get selected text
const start = target.selectionStart;
const end = target.selectionEnd;
const selectedText = target.value.substring(start, end);
// Stop normal paste
e.preventDefault();
let bbcode;
if (start !== end) {
// Use selected text as anchor text
bbcode = `[url=${text}]${selectedText}[/url]`;
} else {
// No selected text
bbcode = `[url=${text}]change_text[/url]`;
}
// Insert BBCode
target.setRangeText(
bbcode,
start,
end,
'end'
);
// Notify site's JavaScript that the textarea changed
target.dispatchEvent(new Event('input', {
bubbles: true
}));
});
// MutationObserver
const observer = new MutationObserver(function () {
addNote();
});
observer.observe(document.body, {
childList: true,
subtree: true
});
// Initial check
addNote();
addStyles();
})();
On my side it is perfectly work for me but if anything need to change PX-Z can add it up
Anyway, Thanks to PX-Z, it's really useful tool
65. Post 67140011 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 18:59:02 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :
[edited out]
I would recommend at least two steps: using an hardware wallet that hasn’t been using subpar practice, this mean avoid ledger, at least, and using one that supports your own entropy to generate the seed, via dice rolling, for example.
This, before moving to a multivendor, multi sign setup.
I have seen a lot of folks jumping into the promotion of multi-signature, multi-vendor and/or various forms of collaborative custody, which I find to be potentially overly complicated.
And, yeah, perhaps many of us have lost a decent amount of confidence regarding the ways that seeds have been generated, so then there are some kinds of hardware wallets that allow us to add our own entropy. I also have gained confidence in the use of passphrases, so I think that a passphrase that is at least 12 characters of numbers, letters, capital and symbols would likely provide enough difficulty to make it quite secure, and sure you could add several more characters if you want a bit more difficulty in your passphrase.
...A long and complex passphrase is still non-hackable with today's technology. If a Coldcard-generated seed was additionally protected with a complex passphrase, the BTC would probably not be among the +1500 coins that got stolen. Some 2 and 3-word passphrases got bruteforced. An 8-word passphrase wouldn't be. An 8-word passphrase with numbers, lowercase & uppercase letters, and special characters even less so.
These are two different things and in one case your bitcoin are at risk (like here with coldcard scam...) :
-passphrase or password (bip38) would not help you at all.
Of course a passphrase would have had helped, and it is almost impossible to break into a passphrase that has 12 characters or more that are combined with numbers, letters, upper case and characters.
A custom password used to encrypt and lock a single Bitcoin private key into a secure 58-character string
-extra-word or bip39 (that is not a password but literally part of the seed) yes it's an extra word and not the password it would be used.
Yes a very long string could help but at this point I don't see any reason to have those risks and rely on a third party for a seed generation.
If you choose a sufficiently complex passphrase of 12 characters or more, you have a lot of protections, so I don't see why you are proclaiming such efforts to be futile.
By the way, if I thought that my initial 12 seed words were vulnerable, then surely I would regenerate them and not stick with ONLY the passphrase as a protection, so surely it is better to have the 12-24 seedwords and the passphrase also rather than merely relying on one of them.
66. Post 67139630 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 16:25:01 CEST 2026) in Test - do not delete please:
🎰 Grailbet is an online casino and sports betting platform offering a wide variety of gaming and wagering options. The platform features an extensive casino library—including video slots, live dealer games, table games, and proprietary "Grail Originals"—alongside a comprehensive sportsbook covering major sports like soccer, basketball, tennis, and e-sports. Registered in Saint Lucia and licensed in Anjouan, Grailbet supports modern crypto payments, rewards programs, and regular promotions for both casino and sports bettors. Grailbet.com is presenting a free raffle for the community.
Prize
1st: $25
2nd: $15
3rd: $10
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
⚡ Three winners will
share $50 in Bitcoin* The prize has 2x wagering requirement. 1x wagering requirement if you use the tracking link from this thread to sign up..
⚡ Reward will be credited to your
Grailbet account.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ I and
Grailbet reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format: Grailbet Username:
Slot number:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
67. Post 67139306 (unedited backup) (by aoluain) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 14:17:25 CEST 2026) in Fear Bitcoin, Buy Gold from me:
I really don't have any issue with Gold and believe it isn't bad to add to one's portfolio
I am not negative towards Gold either and I guess that a lot of Bitcoiners also have Gold in
whatever they deem as a portfolio.
in the same time this continue deny of the value of bitcoin and its economy. Probably it's just a way to troll the community and obtain some visibility.
or that he deep down believes/realises that Bitcoin does actually have value but he cannot
say that in public because it goes against his business model
I do have to say that I found it interesting about his commentry on all the other points he makes
about the state of the US economy.
Schiff is very intelligent and has made brilliant analysis over the last few years.
I also believe so, I did mention that I found his points about the US economy interesting.
He has talked non sense about gold outperforms Bitcoin.
With me, this short video and answer from Peter Schiff is enough to make him failed in attempt to shill gold against Bitcoin. With Bitcoin, there is no need to assess it is a real bitcoin by any third party company.
Saying Gold has outperformed BTC is nonsense, makes no sense to me, so brother, that's not the problem. The problem is he thinks BTC
and he also gets to slate Bitcoin at every opportunity and because he is seen as this Gold tycoon
it can be seen that hs is an authority in all things Bitcoin, so everyone should listen to him.
