Well, the new tool from Bitmover gives you an idea of what to expect in the future if you DCA, as you can see it calculates and shows you how DCA is effective. It's a good tool to those who can't do manual calculations.

To me, I am using the spreadsheet template from Coingecko; it requires an API, but if you are just tracking BTC, it won't hit your limit.
More templates from here: https://www.coingecko.com/en/api/templates


We just want to avoid any random apps nowadays because when they see the BTC price pumping, many scammers pop up around to look for victims. New apps like this are risky; we do not know what is behind the app.

Yeah thanks mate I've got it now. I just got confused where was my bets because I could see it anywhere and it seems like it disappear from the platform luckily I've seen your post here and you are seeing "My Bets" Tab.

Im just new on the platform I'm still getting use to it now, I lose my first bet on Sportbetting I was just betting on Dota 2 games it seems fun because I also play as well, but got my first win yesterday not bad.



Gonna more rounds today and I'm already getting a feel to it,  Goodluck!

This is what I really like about DCA, since it eliminate the disturbing situation and what people need to deal with it is to be consistent with their accumulation.

No losing with DCA not unless they decide to liquidate. Common losses will occur with day traders because they are dealing with fast phase or changes and hard to deal with this situation, especially if they are not sure what's going to happen next on Bitcoin.

@bitmover creates a tool which can help people on their DCA journey better check this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594323.msg67149688#msg67149688

Parece que não foi nada de muito grave (até agora)
Porém quando li:

Based on our investigation to date, there is no indication that MetaMask wallets or customer funds have been affected.

Já bate uma leve desconfiança que pode dar uma #$%da maior

---

Eu também me arrependo de não ter vendido mais ETH
Nessa última ATH do BTC eu acreditei que o ETH ia pra quase 10k USD pelo menos e segurei 


Eu já me arrisquei bastante vezes pra consegui um bom yield, ou para farmar algum projeto, mas hoje em dia não estou com estômago para ficar com dinheiro preso, rendendo 6 a 8% ao ano e ficar esperando alguma notícia: protocolo X foi hackeado


Eu preferia o bom e velho POW
Acho que muita gente abandonou o ETH depois disso
Sempre falavam que os mineradores só mineravam e despejavam moedas, mas depois que acabou a mineração, o ETH sofreu demais para só chegar na ATH anterior, provando que nem era isso o problema do ETH quanto ao preço

Mas a rede realmente está muito mais barata de movimentar

Quem sabe numa possível alta futura o ETH não possa até superar a valorização do BTC?
Muita gente ainda espera que ele chegue aos 10k

This script is very interesting and I believe it could be useful.
Personally, I've never felt the need for it, and I don't like using extra scripts, but I recognize the usefulness of the tool.




So what if this is an option for a specific button or key combination?
Waiting a few seconds is no longer an issue, because it's responding to a specific user request.

But my idea is a bit more advanced, and good for those who often quote.

My idea would be to copy text from a website, and then, upon clicking a specific button, it would create something like this:

In other words, when someone copies text, they also take with them the link to the page where the text was copied.

Perhaps it's too complex. Especially since it's an idea coming from someone who doesn't even use this type of script. 

Pode ser uma estratégia de marketing, que ainda antes da campanha começar já estão a ser falados.

Agora, estão a criar muita expectativa, se recuarem, a imagem deles vai ficar feia no fórum.

Veremos o que ira acontecer. Se realmente for como eles dizem, pode criar algum impacto e fazer com que os outros gerentes revejam os seus modelos.

As vezes é preciso isso, para o mercado se reinventar.

Aproveitando, a inflação diminuiu também, pouca coisa. Em 2023 foi herdado 211%. No primeiro ano (2024) já caiu pra 118% em seguida (2025) caiu para 31,5%. Em 2026 o acumulado, segundo o INDEC é 21,3% (Jan-Ago)



E o PIB segue aumentando ano a ano:



E nos últimos anos vem sendo melhor do que o Brasileiro:

Bitmover made the BTC DCA tool that we have linked in this thread.

Pelo que eu li, a Lido arcaria com as perdas da MetaMask se tivesse acontecido um corte dos validadores (eles tem um fundo para isso).. então parece muito tranquilo para usuários pequenos..

E se a merda for muito grande, ai você iria perder igual mesmo sem os ETH em stake porque a queda também seria grande

Sobre o PoS, eu gostei muito do modelo monetário e também do desempenho da rede.. cortou muito a inflação e melhoraram diversos pontos.. uma pena que isso não se refletiu no preço.. vamos ver como vai estar daqui 40 anos, com sorte o Vitalik termina o projeto antes de se aposentar.. é um fork atrás do outro

Eu me imagino todas as situações por ex. de defi pool ou todas as plataformas de empréstimos descentralizados que estão pagando juros, ate agora. Tenho a sensação que a IA ainda vai achar muito bug.

Exactly, crypto dudes don't want to download anything that is new and not verified by anyone, especially if the site link looks like that but the site UI is smooth and too much AIantic, I know this is not a word haha.

Tracking my DCA in BTC is way easier for me without giving my personal information to anyone or downloading anything. I can use Bitmover's tool, which he recently added. But OP, if you can, then please make a website version where people can privately test the product, or at least add some pictures so we can get a better idea of what you have made.

Where can i find that tab? It my first time doing sportbetting on this platform I was just kinda confuse, I bet on Sport dota 2 winning.



It disappear on my betting slip, it that supposed to happened? or something wrong happened here? where can i find the My bets tab here in the platform, there was no game history yet I'm guessing that it wasn't recorded yet since the match was still not finish but I wasn't sure if the bet go through since I can't see it on the platform that I've done the bet.

Of course. 4 year period of Bitcoin accumulation may not yield the expected results, but the figure shown in the DCA calculator from 2022 is realistic and shows a sustainable position of earning about 107% profit. If we can increase the period by another 6 years, it may be possible to be in a more favorable investment position. The longer the DCA period, the stronger the sustainable investment position will be.

It is very impressive for any investor to have about $4.59 million with profit from a capital of $2.2 million in 4 years, but reaching that level is not easy and will not be possible for many investors. Anyway I think that if an investor is able to accumulate $50 Bitcoin per week and continue for 4 years, he could get almost double the result from the capital of 1.1 million and if he can do it for 10 years, he will be able to reach a great investment position. He just has to do DCA regularly with patience.

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan Oktober 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 116 user (bertambah 5 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty qwk Vod vapourminer mprep philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hybridsole stompix hilariousandco Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 Lucius TryNinja holydarkness tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro decodx BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket Mia Chloe

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus Welsh ibminer joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV SFR10 Lucius TryNinja holydarkness Lafu Cointxz AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk Vispilio hosemary JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack KTChampions icopress sheenshane logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin mole0815 bitmover Lakai01 morvillz7z fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse inspace Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro decodx Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist ZAINmalik75 AHOYBRAUSE YodasRedRocket PowerGlove SirJohnVonSlotty Mia Chloe

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana roycilik

Sumber: DT update log Oktober 2026

Eu nunca na minha vida vi esse "", tive até que procurar aqui.. o "disabled..." eu sempre via, mas foi a primeira vez que notei que o fórum tinha dois comportamentos..

Realmente, cada usuário usa o fórum de uma maneira


Mas nessas redes sociais esses caracteres são trackers né.. você abre o link que alguém enviou e aparece "veja o que fulano compartilhou com você, cadastre-se no xyz também".. eu também costumo apagar.

I had already tested this notification bot.
Isn't it kind of a slow thing? We can access our notifications through other bots quickly; then my question is, why would anyone use this one, right? My suggestion to you is to make a dedicated bot where users can be able to access their notifications faster, without opening the website again and again. You need to give a reason to your users to use your tool or project. You can create such a tool on Telegram or any other supported platform.

And in that tool, you can add a backlink feature in every user's notification to promote your own website faster. This is just my suggestion. Besides this, you know better what is best for your website.

Other than this, Thanks for considering adding more older data regarding user notifications in your tool.

This month 116 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

Eu também acho que essa medida provisória cai. Não faz sentido, é uma insegurança jurídica absurda, muito aleatória, o governo totalmente perdido.

Sem contar que o Congresso, em grande parte, é contra o Lula. O pessoal que é oposição, então tudo que eles puderem fazer pra ir contra o Lula vai ser feito.

É uma pena. Se você parar pra pensar, o Congresso estava todo alinhado pra continuar um governo de direita ali, mas as manobras aí ferraram tudo, cara.

Complicado. É difícil o Brasil, hein? Está cada vez pior.

I gave you a little boost here.
It would be good if you had an "X" share button, with an already preconfigured X post and text description. For now, when I share, it's just an image + link

Fato!
A aba local sempre foi um bom local para receber meritos, mas hoje até com algum esforço está mais complicado receber merits aqui do que lá fora.
O que eu recebo, distribuo tudo (ou quase) aqui dentro, mas é pouco.

Acho que essa distância se dá principalmente por falta de mão de obra qualificada. As geradoras PRECISAM conter esses cortes, então elas vão apoiar qualquer iniciativa que dê lucro. Só precisa de pessoas para fazer acontecer.


A Rentabilidade de nenhum dos projetos é citada, nem mesmos as duas empresas listadas (Renova e Axia) tem em seus relatórios menções sobre rentabilidade, apenas a Renova fala em um menor curtailment (desperdício) que caiu de 51% para 39%. E de que o cliente ocultou adiantou alguns milhões para o caixa da empresa. E Axia cita investimentos, mas não deixa claro o projeto de mineração, provavelmente por ser muito pequeno (6 MW) frente a toda a empresa. E a Minter não se sabe nada, só o que há na imprensa.


Acredito que eles lucram com esses projetos, mas o ponto é como citei acima, não temos mão de obra qualificada. As geradoras querem monetizar essa energia com qualquer valor acima de zero.


Quando a noite chega eles usam tudo, menos a solar: Termo, Nuclear e a própria Eólica no caso do Nordeste, que é bem forte no segundo semestre. Acho que, assim como o caso da Axia, eles fazem um contrato com a energia que seria descartada e fixa o preço justamente pra não ter que desligar. No contrato da Axia eles não falam se para ou não as máquinas, mas dá pra fazer conta e inferir que foram 6 MW x Horas no Ano (8.760) x 6 anos de contrato dá 315,4 GWh, que é justamente o que foi contratado. Então nesse caso eles não param e acho que não deve ter muito ajuste além disso justamente por ter muita energia sobrando.

I would not deny that over any 4-year period, there are reasonably decent chances that investors into bitcoin are going to be profitable in their buying bitcoin and also in there choosing to DCA into bitcoin, and surely we know that the longer the DCA period then the better that the results end up being.

In your particular example, a guy would have had to have invested in the ballpark of $10,300 per week into bitcoin in order to invest $2.2 million over 4 years, so there are not very many folks who would be able to pull off those kinds of numbers over that short of a period of time, especially from their regular income. 

Of course, if they were reallocating into bitcoin from other investments, then they could have had chosen to spread out their investment into bitcoin rather than lump summing into bitcoin, yet it seems to me that DCA investing tends to work out better for guys when they are allocating from a stream of income rather than their already having the amount available for investing, and surely many of us likely realize that anyone who would have had lump sum into bitcoin 4 years ago, would have had been able to get bitcoin at anywhere between $16k and $22k, so they would have had done better as a lump summer (or at least someone front loading their investment in mid-to-late 2022 as compared with guys who had spread their bitcoin investment out in a DCA in the last 4-ish years.   

I am surely not proclaiming that lump sum buying is more applicable than DCA, since so many times, guys advocate lump sum rather than DCA, yet lump sum ends up not being applicable for an overwhelming majority of folks who tend to be more able to manage their bitcoin income over streams of ongoing and inflowing income rather than really having lump sum amounts that come available.

Actually, in cases that lump sum amounts do come available to some guys, I tend to presume that lump sum amounts are tending to come available at the same time that streams of income are also available, so I tend to recommend that guys consider their cashflows and any cash amounts that they have available in terms of all three of their options 1) buying right away, 2) DCA and 3) buy on dips that might not end up happening.... forms of deferral (related to DCA and buying on dips) can serve as great hedging strategies to off set large amounts that they might end up choosing to put into bitcoin right away.


I am not too thrilled about the idea of future DCA calculators, even though surely guys seem quite inclined to want to project their DCA results into the future.

Bitmover had been working on a tool that incorporates my presumptions regarding how the 200-WMA will grow into the future and also how those projections relate to how the BTC spot price will grow into the future (the tool has been labelled as fuck you status and so it relates to how many bitcoin might be needed to reach fuck you status), and in some private communications, we had been discussing my own projection as compared with other possible ways of projecting the BTC price into the future, so of course, I have an inclination towards my own projections, yet at the same time, bitmover has some of his own ideas that relate to alternative ways of projecting future BTC prices that might be able to be incorporated into a DCA projection tool, even though surely there is a certain grain of salt expectation that underlying presumptions might end up leading to quite a bit of variability from what ends up happening in the real world if the future projections are not sufficiently tethered to some kind of a reasonable foundation, and so many foundations might seem reasonable, but they end up being greatly off when they are projected and magnified into the future.

O governo americano lançou recentemente um site que é tipo um ChatGPT/Gemini, mas que usa só dados do governo: https://america.gov/

Perguntei ali e ele disse que a inflação acumulada nos últimos 10 anos foi de 39%:


Não é nem metade de 100%, mas é muita coisa para ser os EUA.. fora que essas medições são totalmente manipuladas e não refletem a realidade de quase ninguém.

The tools are quite good and have enough features, but I think the DCA calculator could be more useful if the average price and ROI options were added to the chart's hover toolup.

Now, if you hover over a specific area on the chart, you will see the Total Investment, Portfolio Value and Bitcoin Accumulated. If you can see the Average Average Price and ROI up to that date, it will be easier to understand how the investment performance has changed over the entire DCA period. And there is no need to add a separate large section. The existing chart already has the tooltip functionality, just add two new options. This is just my personal suggestion, if you find it useful, you can do it. Anyway, it is a great tool to understand the DCA process and encourage investors.

Deve ser uma conta bem complexa.. o que acontece de noite quando as pessoas chegam em casa e a energia solar some? o minerador paga preço cheio do kWh? quanto fica o preço médio? ou ele desliga suas máquinas e fica a ver navios? aqui no Brasi, a energia é bem cara.

Outro dia eu vi que a OpenAI oferece uns descontos em criações de imagens em lotes e que eles são procesados em 1-2 dias, algo assim.. imagino que eles também façam algo parecido, de fazer isso quando há pouco uso dos data centers (já que deve ter picos de consumo, igual qualquer outra coisa, mesmo sendo um produto global).

Sobre a mineração, também vi um caso na Finlândia onde estavam aquecendo uma comunidade de 11 mil pessoas.. realmente os caras inventam várias coisas..


Primeira vez que vejo Xique-Xique sem ser um meme

Wish I was as fast as you. 

Thanks, 0verview has been updated with your chart.



I honestly don't remember the last time you were left out of the top 3. I guess you became a little bit complacent, but I have no doubt you'll be back in the top 3 in the next overview. 

 

Are you saying that the bot came to life on its own?

 

Indeed, AI is gradually taking over our lives.

Your bot is proof that we're close to chaos!

Failed image, or is it my impression?

BIP39 wallets already create segwit bech32 addresses by default in BIP84 (or BIP86, or both for multiscript wallets), so the user doesn't even need to manually select inputs, do you often see users of BIP39 wallets, like Bluewallet for instance, reporting being confused?

Electrum seeds do encode this information within the mnemonic itself, however, for users who want to access multiple address types within a single wallet, the Electrum seed becomes inefficient and obsolete, as it derives only one address type and one account.

I don't want to manage 04 separate mnemonics for every address type, each with its own version number that derives a specific path and script.

If that were truly the case, the Electrum seed would be the standard rather than BIP39. It has been over +13 years since BIP39 was introduced, and to this day, I don't see people struggling to access their balances, the fact that few software apps support the Electrum seed version speaks volumes...

From the DCA calculator I calculated an auto sum of a past cycle to see how much return a long term investor can get from Bitcoin. The Excel sheet shows Cumulative Invested: $2215500 and Portfolio Value: $4587343. What an amazing Investment concept. An investor who has been doing regular DCA and has been saving Bitcoin regularly for the past 4 years has achieved a profit of about 107%.

Valeu bitmover, fiquei em 5 lugar novamente
Estou tentando distribuir os merits conforme dá
Esse mês consegui distribuir 19 merits aqui na nossa aba (outros eu distribui em outras abas internacionais)


Você tem sido um ótimo merit source junto com o bitmover e TryNinja, você tem distribuído bastante e para bastante users diferentes
Já está ótimo joker_josue 

Eu tenho tido essa sensação.
Mas acho que também não estamos com tantos tópicos em destaque.

Vou ver se dou uma melhoria nesse campo.

Its time for another brief overview of local boards activity, and this time for August 2026.  All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview nevertheless.

---

Post activity per local board during August 2026

During August, 15130 posts were written across local boards, which is an increase compared to July's numbers (13938 posts). Majority of this increase happened on three most active boards, but some others like Spanish had noticeable increase compared to previous month. French unfortunately continued declining and now its maybe at all time low numbers, or very close to it.

---

Active members per local board during August 2026

Despite the increase in number of posts, active members went down from 1298 in July to 1265 in August. Nigerian boards keeps dominating this chart, with only Russian being somewhat close to them.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during August 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leader is French board with 80% of such members, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage, only 11%.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Greek board with 56% while French had only 13% of such members.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Croatian board with 56% while French had only 7%.

---

Merit shared per local board during August 2026

During August, 7218 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, and is a big increase compared to July's numbers (5818). Majority of this increase happened on Germna board, that went from 612 merit sent in July to 1510 in August, almost beating Nigerians at the top.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during August 2026

In May, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, which is an increase compared to July's 0.42 merit per post. This time we have Polish board sticking out, but as seen from their last 12 month ratio, last month's was just an exception, and such a big difference can happen on less active boards.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during August 2026

During last month, 562 members sent while 598 received merit which is an expected increase compared to July (509 senders, 588 receivers). Needless to say which local boards dominates this chart as well.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during August 2026

Romanian board remained at the top of this chart with very high 58% of merited posts, but Italian also has a high number, especially considering the fact that its one of the more active local boards on the forum.

---

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during August 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habits of local boards, which (as you can see) differs from board to board.

---

The most active members per local board during August 2026

This time top 3 most active local boards members all come from the same board, Russian. klarki is at the top with 162, while jokers10 and numberal both wrote 135 posts.  GG.

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [162]	|	1. cygan [74]	|	1. mandown [113]	|	1. Italian Panic [48]	|	1. joker_josue [127]	|	1. famososMuertos [58]	|
2. jokers10 [135]	|	2. Soonandwaite [70]	|	2. MK-74 [69]	|	2. Ale88 [44]	|	2. sabotag3x [109]	|	2. darbitmobilerecovery [52]	|
3. Numeral [135]	|	3. 5tift [60]	|	3. yenerbatmaz [67]	|	3. babo [43]	|	3. bitmover [79]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [40]	|
4. safar1980 [123]	|	4. mole0815 [59]	|	4. Hvdv [67]	|	4. fillippone [43]	|	4. TryNinja [67]	|	4. Porfirii [33]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [90]	|	5. MinoRaiola [58]	|	5. kriminall [63]	|	5. Plutosky [34]	|	5. rdluffy [42]	|	5. Filicius [27]	|
6. internetional [87]	|	6. MaxMueller [58]	|	6. Phoenix Anka [62]	|	6. Ultimo2 [26]	|	6. alegotardo [42]	|	6. airbin [22]	|
7. mak013 [78]	|	7. jahead [56]	|	7. Xyloo [62]	|	7. bitbollo [25]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [41]	|	7. danadc [18]	|
8. tvplus006 [78]	|	8. Lakai01 [52]	|	8. emrecemsan [60]	|	8. alexrossi [22]	|	8. mikel_012 [40]	|	8. darxiaomi [13]	|
9. zasad@ [68]	|	9. Unknown01 [42]	|	9. Mustang Shelby [60]	|	9. gbianchi [18]	|	9. diggler [27]	|	9. RobertCG1990 [7]	|
10. klarki_mobile [55]	|	10. Real-Duke [36]	|	10. RaltcoinsB [59]	|	10. bitcoiner180 [16]	|	10. r_victory [27]	|	10. Artemis3 [6]	|

[/table[

```

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [105]	|	1. winspiral [13]	|	1. blockman [57]	|	1. slackovic [53]	|	1. Floxynice [78]	|	1. khaled0111 [39]	|
2. joniboini [55]	|	2. Benhouse [5]	|	2. Peanutswar [36]	|	2. Daniel91 [45]	|	2. Karl_3000 [77]	|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	|
3. mu_enrico [48]	|	3. TryNinja [4]	|	3. rbynxx [33]	|	3. katanic97 [41]	|	3. Africolo [54]	|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	|
4. taufik123 [44]	|	4. Danydee [1]	|	4. tech30338 [31]	|	4. ovcijisir [31]	|	4. TrialBitcoin [48]	|	4. OmegaStarScream [14]	|
5. masulum [42]	|	5. Delaforetnoire [1]	|	5. coin-investor [29]	|	5. Rikafip [29]	|	5. CryptopreneurBrainboss [47]	|	5. hugeblack [12]	|
6. Husna QA [40]	|	6. Halab [1]	|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	|	6. Pmalek [24]	|	6. PremiumcryptoHub [47]	|	6. ObeyKnock [6]	|
7. Luzin [36]	|	7. EXMON [1]	|	7. PX-Z [27]	|	7. cryptofrka [16]	|	7. Qhunman [47]	|	7. aseemhamza [3]	|
8. abhiseshakana [33]	|	8. G.Seed [1]	|	8. arwin100 [26]	|	8. examplens [14]	|	8. Samuel47 [47]	|	8. GxSTxV [2]	|
9. ryzaadit [30]	|	9. fagsosugym7314 [1]	|	9. cryptoaddictchie [26]	|	9. Trofo [13]	|	9. Hypnotizer [45]	|	9. Danydee [1]	|
10. AakZaki [28]	|	10. AL1CE M [1]	|	10. bhadz [23]	|	10. dkbit98 [10]	|	10. Mayor of ogba [44]	|	10. ajmnt [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan	|	Bengali	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [13]	|	1. Bitcoin Smith [43]	|	1. cryptosize [35]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	|	1. Fragrance1122 [56]	|	1. Review Master [25]	|
2. TryNinja [4]	|	2. JSRAW [42]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [30]	|	2. TryNinja [4]	|	2. qurbanshah02 [47]	|	2. Crypto Library [25]	|
3. pawel7777 [3]	|	3. Cointikka [42]	|	3. alani123 [7]	|	3. fillippone [4]	|	3. JunaidAzizi [43]	|	3. Bd officer [25]	|
4. EXMON [1]	|	4. eaLiTy [24]	|	4. Ultegra134 [3]	|	4. NeuroticFish [1]	|	4. HustleZ [34]	|	4. DYING_S0UL [16]	|
	|	5. pawanjain [18]	|	5. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|	5. jedaite [1]	|	5. Junii [33]	|	5. Shishir99 [12]	|
	|	6. hasan5jan7 [18]	|	6. BitcoinsGreece [2]	|	6. snaz3d [1]	|	6. AgriTrack [33]	|	6. Nothingtodo [11]	|
	|	7. Nrcewker [8]	|	7. Conqueror777 [2]	|	7. Zeeloth [1]	|	7. Abdul Sami786 [33]	|	7. Z_MBFM [11]	|
	|	8. TheUltraElite [5]	|	8. mastercryptogr [1]	|	8. BimboDev [1]	|	8. Cheema02 [29]	|	8. Royal Cap [7]	|
	|	9. M47AK16 [5]	|	9. dracarysvlr [1]	|		|	9. Nmjut [27]	|	9. NNRR [5]	|
	|	10. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|		|		|	10. GbitG [25]	|	10. God Of Thunder [4]	|

Sim, mas para isso, queria dizer que o próximo bull vai valorizar uma percentagem maior do que as ultimas bulls que o Bitcoin enfrentou.
Tendencialmente a valorização tem vindo a reduzir não aumentar.

Qualquer das formas espero estar enganado, porque isso seria algo fantástico.

Agora, acredito que depois do próximo bull, os bears ficaram mais próximos do patamar dos 100k.

Vou dizer uma coisa aqui que pode parecer anticientífica, mas com certeza nao é anti-logica em nível individual

Se a gasolina em 2020 (chutando) tava 4 reais e 2030 vai estar 8, e eu uso a gasolina (importantissima essa parte final)

Pra mim a inflação de fato, real, tangível, vai estar no 100%. Mesmo que o IBGE com a analise de 300 itens agregados diga que so aumentou 35%

Bem, isso também é um pouco exagerado.
Em menos de 5 anos, o Bitcoin ficar a vale isso tudo? Acho exagerado.

Não é que não gostasse de ver acontecer, mas acho muito. Principalmente agora com o mundo todo baralhado com estas guerras e crises nos mercados da energia.

Mas, uma coisa é certa, surpreender só mesmo 9 Bitcoin, porque de resto, não vejo outros capazes de o fazer.

I own quite a bit of SpaceX and Tesla. Today, Tesla announced a new Mergers and Acquisitions department sparking some headlines. It appears the merger is going to happen and soon. I am thrilled about this and wanted to own both companies to make sure I wouldn’t get screwed on the deal. Most exciting companies of our lifetimes about to join. 

These funds would, in theory, be held by trusted signature campaign managers, not theymos. They would also be quite small, so nothing that would incentivize people to steal them.


I swear I didn't steal it
I'm the happiest when I'm far away from Meta. It is a good idea though - at least I think so.


You misunderstood. DT1 would not have power to delete posts.
What I'm suggesting is that, when a post is reported to moderators, if it came from a DT1 member and ends up as deleted, it automatically counts against the member that wrote it.
Many such posts deleted by moderators and a sigban is automatically triggered.


There are 10+ paid pools every season, there were 20 or so at one point in time. It would make a lot of sense to separate them.
Not sure whether it would attract more users or not - but I'm sure a lot of people don't even know some of them exist because they hate going into Gambling. And I fully understand that.
Hopefully, more people would be drawn to organic discussions that take place there. The buyin for a full year of normal conversation is usually quite low.


This is exactly what I'm talking about. It's running since 2023.
Join us from next season, we'd love to have you


Well, kind of - yeah. I hope that discussions would improve there little by little but I'd also be ok with letting a part of the forum burn if it means that Gambling in general improves.


It would be purely statistical, based on previously agreed parameters (mostly revolving around deleted posts and banned members).


This is about tackling spam, not choosing who I like to work with. I don't suggest we select central authorities to police us, just to have an overview about which campaigns perform good and which do not.


I like gambling very much. I don't really like the gambling boards. Therefore, I'd really like to improve the situation on the part of the forum that attracts me the most - at least based on a personal preference.

The quote below is from Signature Campaign Guidelines thread, so there are measures in place for managers who are not doing their jobs properly. The question is, have these measures ever actually been enforced?
 

Memorizing is not a best and safest way to remember wallet seed phrases a long time. It can work in short term but if a user stops recalling that wallet seed phrase daily, he will forget it after a while.

With many things to concern, there is risk that we will forget to practice wallet seed phrase recall daily, and sooner or later we will reach to a time of forgetting it.

provavelmente era provocação, afinal, sua bet não pode, mas a minha pode e é "legalizada", é foda viu, até comentei no outro topico, que empresa agora vai querer vir pra ca? não é só o caso de bets, é o problema generalizado que isso vai trazer, porque se alguem quer investir aqui, segue as regras, coloca dinheiro, coloca o risco... e chega do dia pra noite mudam todas as regras... é uma insegurança juridica absurda que vai espantar todas as coisas empresas q um dia pensam em abrir um negocio por aqui, um governo perdido, de gente desqualificada e corrupta, triste de ver.... o enorme potencial que esse pais tem e é capado por essa corja de incompetentes.

Indeed.  The largest flying object ever made by humans and it will be building the future internet around the planet and making mankind a multi-planetary species.  I am not sure, but I think I may be more excited about this than when I discovered Bitcoin.  I wish I could have gotten into SpaceX with a sub-$10,000,000 market cap like I did with Bitcoin instead of getting in at $1,700,000,000,000, but I'm still happy to be along for the ride. 

To Infinity And Beyond!

You are delusional if you believe that there is any meaningful chance that trading will accelerate (or improve) the ability and/or ease that you might be able to accumulate 1 bitcoin.

The best way to have assurance of advancing towards getting to 1 bitcoin is by ongoingly buying bitcoin and also by figuring out ways to increase your discretionary income so that you can buy more bitcoin with the higher levels of discretionary income that you would be able to reach.


You should assume that the odds of you being more profitable by trading as compared with ongoingly buying bitcoin is quite low, especially since trading means selling and selling means causing you to have less bitcoin, which also means that you are employing tactics that involve waiting to buy bitcoin rather than acting to ongoingly buy bitcoin, so then if you sell bitcoin with an expectation of being able to buy more, you are actually gambling on one set of events (the BTC price going down) and if the price does not go down and even worse if it goes up you end up with less bitcoin because you had been spending that time waiting rather than actually ongoing and persistently buying.

The odds are against traders to have more bitcoin than ongoing buyers, especially if we consider those kinds of behaviors on a consistent and persistent 8 year or more (2 cycles or more) basis.

You can look at the DCA charts yourself and see what the performance of a guy who had been ongoingly accumulating bitcoin for the past 8-ish years or more.  Do you really think that you can beat those results by fucking around trying to trade rather than staying focused on buying...

Look at it.  A guy who had been investing $100 per week in the past 8 years would have had invested $42k and he would have had accumulated 2.34 BTC.  You really think that you can beat that with fucking around trying to trade?  Why not take the sure results of ongoingly buying bitcoin rather than gambling with BTC prices maybe going down and maybe not and taking chances on the value of ongoingly waiting rather than ongoingly acting (through ongoing buying and ongoingly building up your discretionary funds to buy bitcoin)?


You seem to be living in dreamlandia @Odusko if believe that gambling with your bitcoin is a good way to build it.. gambling is more likely to lead you to being more poor rather than getting lucky from having had been gambling rather than building.

Eu como não sou fã de futebol, acho isso uma palhaçada (também acharia se fosse fã).. já foi uma palhaçada aquela Copa.

Não entendo porque não deixam essas porras de clubes falirem se não dão lucro, como qualquer empresa que existe.. é o famoso pão (bolsa família) e circo (futebol).

Ainda sobre o tema, ontem vi uma publicação da Cazé TV no Twitter com um símbolo de "Loterias Caixa".. mas não parei pra ver se era meme/provocação ou se realmente fecharam alguma parceria.. tem muita gente grande ai que vai quebrar.

As penso se não são essas ondas de previsões, que acabam por realmente influenciar o mercado e fazer ele subir ou descer.

Claro que isto é só uma sensação. Mas, assim como quando todo o mundo começa a falar que vai descer, ele desce mesmo, o inverso parece que acontece o mesmo.

Pois é, quando ta subindo é muito simples e facil fazer isso... Eu não duvido que um dia o bitcoin custara 1 milhao de dolares, afinal, o sistema monetario baseado em divida e emissao de dinheiro faz o bitcoin "subir" infinitamente, mas ainda vejo um cenario pessimista no curto prazo, a galera que surfou essa onda vai querer realizar e o preço despencar, alias, o preço sobe tbm nos bears.. mas no fim das contas é impossivel saber se vai subir ou cair no curto prazo.

1. Ricardo11, $84,333.33  ~$2.67
2. bitmover, $84,424.31 ~$88.31
3. Woodie, $84,170  $166

Please DM me your Bitz Bitcoin deposit.

É uma alternativa, mas ainda acho que não mude nada de fato. Antes, com a legalização, eles viviam derrubando os clandestinos. No dia da assinatura o ministro da fazenda disse que tinha derrubado mais de 70 mil sites até aquela data. Só que é tão fácil abrir um novo ou usar um mirror que acho que não cause tanto efeito assim. E de toda forma, tu vai pra outro pais e consegue sacar tranquilo

Thanks, bitmover. I agree that rejecting a comment or treating it as spam simply because the user forgot to include proof would be unnecessarily harsh.

On KYCNotList, the required evidence is configured separately for each service and requested in the review form before submission. Therefore, in most cases, a user cannot simply omit the required Order ID or other proof. A submission with missing or insufficient evidence is also not published as a transaction-verified review and does not affect the exchange’s rating.

However, a user may still provide an incorrect Order ID, an incomplete screenshot, or evidence that is insufficient for verification. Your suggestion makes sense for these cases.

We plan to introduce a “Needs additional evidence” status. It would allow the author to edit a pending review, add the missing Order ID, order link, screenshot, or other required evidence, and resubmit it for moderation instead of creating a new review.

Until the additional evidence has been checked, the review would remain unpublished and would not affect the service’s rating or review totals.

Thank you for the useful suggestion.

What part of that block explorer output is unclear to you? You can plainly see the address the tx comes from, the address it's going to, and the USD values of each leg (2.53 in, 0.52 out).

This is a regular SegWit/Taproot tx that happens to include an unreadable OP_RETURN message. The tx is confirmed, on-chain. There's nothing "shielded" about this, and absolutely nothing even remotely similar to what happens with Lightning.

In order for this to be like Zcash "shielding", it would have to hide the sender, receiver, and value using zk-SNARKs at the protocol-level, not just tacking on some OP_RETURN data that might encode a message or perform some other application-layer function. In order for it to be like Lightning, the balance updates would need to happen off-chain, with base layer txs only happening when you're opening/closing a LN channel.

Mas essas bets sem o ".bet.br" já não deviam estar bloqueadas? eu acho que não vai mudar nada.


Que loucura esse governo, vai do 8 ao 80 bem rápido.. o negócio é usar só aba gringa e fingir que nem é brasileiro

Que merda hein, vou acumular a grana lá então e quando eu visitar algum país vizinho eu solicito o saque, geralmente costumo ir com certa frequência….. nem tudo está perdido hehe


Eh o nosso supremo líder do governo da república federativa democrática de banania sempre evoluindo e “cuidando das pessoas”.

These claims are not correct and are provided without proof. Platforms have reputation systems in place for reasons like this, so there are traders that have made thousands or tens of thousands of transactions over the years without any issues. So this claim here is a false. If someone decides to purchase coins the wrong way or from unknown individuals then the responsibility of the bad decisions lies on the person. That they get criminal coins with these methods does not prove that getting clean coins without KYC is hard.

Quite a strange way to write it, because that is exactly what they should be doing and are doing. This is a known method to get rid of bad coins.

It is safe when done correctly, and the author of this thread knows that. Please don't make false claims here, he asked for help to create a list.

Coins that come from mixers can often be tracked or they are marked as high risk these days.

But Uniswap is not a mixer, so I don't understand how this connects to the talk about mixers? Swapping on Uniswap can be traced directly through the blockchains, some tools have this very automated so there is no way to hide the coins by making on chain swaps like that.

This thread is not about tax evasion?

You can buy Bitcoin without KYC on hyperliquid? I thought that was only crypto to crypto?

It's not really shielded Bitcoin as in that proposal, he also mentioned this, it's a owner change, not a settlement.
Insanely complicated, heavy footprint 3 times the normal size, not really 100% anonymous.
The whole obfuscation this way would rely on volume and number of outputs, how do you do volume to hide that when the tx would be clogging the mempool?

Now, specifically talking about shielded Bitcoin, it will never gain traction, everyone will be scared of regulations, privacy or coins valued back at $1000, what do you think people will choose

DCA does not improve your average entry price, even though DCA does help you to facilitate balancing the amount that you put into bitcoin with your discretionary funds and/or other ongoing cashflow considerations.


Whether you are back testing or future projecting, we are using hypothetical persons in order that we do not necessarily need to talk about our own circumstances.

Of course, we can look at a person who registered in the forum in 2018, which would be 8 years ago, then we could project what he would have had accumulated in bitcoin if he had been accumulating $100 per week during those 8 years, and yeah, he would have had invested right about $42k and he would have had accumulated right about 2.334 BTC, which surely would be a good place to be in.  Of course, there could be guys who had engaged in other tactics, and they could compare their own performance to the hypothetical guy.

By the way, if we project forward for a guy investing $100 per week, then we could determine that he would invest $5,200 in 1 year and he would invest $52k over 10 years.  Of course, we cannot be sure how many bitcoin that he might end up getting or what might be the price of bitcoin in 10 years, yet we can project out those numbers and we can even adapt our projections specifically to our own expectations in regards to our own personal circumstances and even project out a base case and then perhaps better and worse case scenarios so that we might get some ideas about how we expect our bitcoin investment might go.

I wouldn't want to emphasize the deletion of images so much, because the probability of errors or deleting images that are already on the forum might increase.

Either way, I'll keep the idea noted down for future analysis.

You said you could do that easily but I would like to know what's next.

Because as far as I know, nations in Europe are very strict with tax and they have powerful infrastructures to trace their citizen money flows. You can trade (buy, sell) bitcoin on Bisq, even with big volume by doing several trades but to get USD or EUR, you will need to use banks.

Am I right about that?

If you need to use banks, you will have problems with tax.

That looks good, although the delete-button should only work for at most an hour.

Investment is a very good way for people who are not rich to accumulate their wealth and change their financial lives to become the rich in the future. They of course will have to do intelligent investment by choosing good assets such as in cryptocurrency market, choosing Bitcoin will give them a safest investment portfolio.

If they decide to invest but do it wrongly such as spending money for shitcoins, they will very likely not get richer but actually get poorer, even bankrupted.

DCA is a classic investment strategy and it works well for strong assets like Bitcoin. DCA can be used for accumulation but also for take profit with time.

https://costavg.com/
https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy

Paid.
https://mempool.space/tx/40c81178445f77bac25934be9cefcd0bc9e043722bbc2245d7537c6ae69a57e7

Update:
DT 1
     1. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (19) 10537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 24140: qwk (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1769 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11497 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4818 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3685 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 10160 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 9043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +55 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2655 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (14) 6876 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (37) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2391 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 14016 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6818 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 7036 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (27) 3991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 787 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +41 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4517 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11557 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (24) 12254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (32) 6381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 10556 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1430 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4007 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3744 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7076 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2357 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5177 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4689 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (41) 13446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1499 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2403 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7761 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 21486 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 5865 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +47 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (5) 3826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1913 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1730 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5827 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (29) 8371 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1655 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5396 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1305 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (8893 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (15135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Winner:
26 Barcode_

Winner 2:
47 chenille

Winner 3:
34 Pmalek

Giveaway Result

Congratulations!

Eligible:

02   knuckey
03   mv1986
04   Woodie
06   xandry
07   ovcijisir
08   Mehmet69
09   internetional
10   Ricardo11
12   tiCeR
13   TheButterZone
14   Smartprofit
16   klarki
18   Zlantann
19   GIF-JOBS
20   Zwei
21   Pandorak
22   PolarCrypto
23   DabsPoorVersion
25   bitmover
26   Barcode_
29   demonica
31   TheButterZone
33   ASloveapg
34   Pmalek
37   Hypnotizer
38   Warkop
39   Itz-prisigold
40   ChocolateBitcoinK
43   Improved
44   el che
45   examplens
47   chenille
49   Debbiecrypto

ineligible:

01   cumakoff
05   bitzizzix
15   f150
17   Yoona_As
27   RTX-G53
11   MuffinMaster
24   Ninja Primes
28   inearth

To ineligible participants: Do not participate in my raffles if you do not read the rules.
You guys are on my ignore list starting today

Winner:
34 rbynxx

Winner 2:
09 knuckey

Winner 3:
25 el che

Giveaway Result

Eligible:

01   xandry
02   Woodie
03   Woodie
04   Smartprofit
05   Smartprofit
06   bitmover
08   tiCeR
09   knuckey
14   Pmalek
15   Ricardo11
19   Road21Bitcoin
21   Pandorak
25   el che
27   Debbiecrypto
29   sokani
33   inearth
34   rbynxx
42   Improved
47   chenille

ineligible

07   cumakoff
10   bitzizzix
17   Yoona_As
28   f150
44   Ninja Primes
16   Mr. Magkaisa
39   RTX-G53

Do not participate in my raffles if you do not read the rules.
You guys are on my ignore list starting today

Winner:
23 hopenotlate

Winner 2:
35 Ricardo11

Winner 3:
19 Road21Bitcoin

Giveaway Result

Please DM me your Bitz.io Bitcoin deposit address.