I wouldn't want to emphasize the deletion of images so much, because the probability of errors or deleting images that are already on the forum might increase.

Either way, I'll keep the idea noted down for future analysis.

You said you could do that easily but I would like to know what's next.

Because as far as I know, nations in Europe are very strict with tax and they have powerful infrastructures to trace their citizen money flows. You can trade (buy, sell) bitcoin on Bisq, even with big volume by doing several trades but to get USD or EUR, you will need to use banks.

Am I right about that?

If you need to use banks, you will have problems with tax.

That looks good, although the delete-button should only work for at most an hour.

Investment is a very good way for people who are not rich to accumulate their wealth and change their financial lives to become the rich in the future. They of course will have to do intelligent investment by choosing good assets such as in cryptocurrency market, choosing Bitcoin will give them a safest investment portfolio.

If they decide to invest but do it wrongly such as spending money for shitcoins, they will very likely not get richer but actually get poorer, even bankrupted.

DCA is a classic investment strategy and it works well for strong assets like Bitcoin. DCA can be used for accumulation but also for take profit with time.

https://costavg.com/
https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy

Paid.
https://mempool.space/tx/40c81178445f77bac25934be9cefcd0bc9e043722bbc2245d7537c6ae69a57e7

Update:
DT 1
     1. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (19) 10537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 24140: qwk (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1769 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11497 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4818 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3685 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 10160 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 9043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +55 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2655 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (14) 6876 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (37) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2391 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 14016 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6818 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 7036 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (27) 3991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 787 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +41 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4517 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11557 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (24) 12254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (32) 6381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 10556 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1430 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4007 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3744 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7076 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2357 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5177 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4689 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (41) 13446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1499 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2403 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7761 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 21486 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3229 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 5865 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +47 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (5) 3826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1913 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1730 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5827 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (29) 8371 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1655 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5396 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1305 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (8893 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (15135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Winner:
26 Barcode_

Winner 2:
47 chenille

Winner 3:
34 Pmalek

Giveaway Result

Congratulations!

Eligible:

02   knuckey
03   mv1986
04   Woodie
06   xandry
07   ovcijisir
08   Mehmet69
09   internetional
10   Ricardo11
12   tiCeR
13   TheButterZone
14   Smartprofit
16   klarki
18   Zlantann
19   GIF-JOBS
20   Zwei
21   Pandorak
22   PolarCrypto
23   DabsPoorVersion
25   bitmover
26   Barcode_
29   demonica
31   TheButterZone
33   ASloveapg
34   Pmalek
37   Hypnotizer
38   Warkop
39   Itz-prisigold
40   ChocolateBitcoinK
43   Improved
44   el che
45   examplens
47   chenille
49   Debbiecrypto

ineligible:

01   cumakoff
05   bitzizzix
15   f150
17   Yoona_As
27   RTX-G53
11   MuffinMaster
24   Ninja Primes
28   inearth

To ineligible participants: Do not participate in my raffles if you do not read the rules.
You guys are on my ignore list starting today

Winner:
34 rbynxx

Winner 2:
09 knuckey

Winner 3:
25 el che

Giveaway Result

Eligible:

01   xandry
02   Woodie
03   Woodie
04   Smartprofit
05   Smartprofit
06   bitmover
08   tiCeR
09   knuckey
14   Pmalek
15   Ricardo11
19   Road21Bitcoin
21   Pandorak
25   el che
27   Debbiecrypto
29   sokani
33   inearth
34   rbynxx
42   Improved
47   chenille

ineligible

07   cumakoff
10   bitzizzix
17   Yoona_As
28   f150
44   Ninja Primes
16   Mr. Magkaisa
39   RTX-G53

Do not participate in my raffles if you do not read the rules.
You guys are on my ignore list starting today

Winner:
23 hopenotlate

Winner 2:
35 Ricardo11

Winner 3:
19 Road21Bitcoin

Giveaway Result

Please DM me your Bitz.io Bitcoin deposit address.

Thanks for sharing this helpful too by Bitmover who, as always, have brought a lot of innovations to make the forum enjoyable. Since a lot of use plebs use the DCA strategy, this tool will be very helpful.

I fear same, more because private Bitcoin is not a solved issue yet and to think of it, the base layer shouldn't be complex all in the name of private transactions because this could be a huge systemic risk to deal with.
Maybe in the future if such an idea works efficiently, I could opt for it but I believe privacy is better as an optional higher layer than it is assumed to become.

well, you can hope in one hand and..... haha

i'll update everyone the new changes when we're done.

Eu também não curto quando tem que colocar Telegram ou qualquer outra coisa no meio. Eu acho que as informações deveriam sempre ficar centralizadas aqui no fórum. Quando começa a misturar um monte de contato, geralmente dá problema.

E também tem a questão da privacidade. Não é todo mundo que gosta de ficar conversando sobre esse tipo de assunto fora do fórum. Tem pessoas que usam pseudônimos aqui e completo anonimato, o que também é uma coisa muito válida.

Enfim, eu também não curto isso não, cara. Acho muito invasivo, digamos assim.

Bitcoin has been better Gold for years now and no one can argue about it, although bitcoin price can change at any time and that is part of how it works, but when we look at the most successful between Bitcoin and Gold, bitcoin has been the best, people can doubt bitcoin, but those who believe and understand bitcoin will never doubt it, the people who doubt bitcoin are the same people who can't hold, and if you can’t hold your bitcoin for a long period of time to make a good profit, you should not buy or invest in bitcoin, because bitcoin is for people who believe in it and are willing to hold without considering how the market works.

Yes it should be removed. I updated the thread (because of new visual implementation) and forgot to make merit per post ratio chart

Thanks

I Initially wanted to start from August since the charts for May were already published, even though I didn’t want to I have to start from the following month.

For now, please enjoy this merit race.

Merit Race:
This race was made with the data from 2018 Feb to 2026 Sep , weekly


https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/30354818/

There is Agent 007. You are the agent of the four 7s. 

I'm almost catching up to you... I already have a target number of merits for the coming period.

Olha que eu duvido... to pra acreditar que a maioria dessa pessoas já jogam em sites que não são legalizados (tem muita propaganda de site que não pagou a licença e sequer estão cediados no Brasil).
Mas... mesmo que eles jogavam em sites legalizados, o governo não vai conseguir barrar sites de fora... eles vão continuar jogando e se preciso utilizando uma exchange daqui pra comprar cripto/stable com fiat e mandar pro cassino.

Sei lá... o Lula tá falando tando disso nas campanhas eleitorais que eu acho que estão contando com esse bloqueio como algo bom pro lado deles.

I think it's ok to still have them there actually. Sometimes people can have their posts moved either by themselves or moderators but at the same time it doesn't necessarily mean their posts are of zero value. Some users infact either lock or move most of their posts once they get what they want.

I think the real numbers is if you scraped the entire forum. There was a recent meta post that eventually got moved to off topic but you can't ignore the merit sent there too.

Totalmente automatizado até pode ser mais complicado. Mas, se servir para sinalizar casos, depois para os humanos polirem as informações, é voltarem analisar. Os resultados vão surpreender e serão muito mais rápidos.

No final é uma questão de tempo, quando mais hops surgirem depois da origem, mais difícil é.
Se com a IA conseguires detectar a ligação de um hop a outro, de forma mais rápida, fica ainda mais difícil esconder.

I think by default the profile is private we need to turn on this option.
As far as I have opened an account on TalkImg by joker_josue I don't actually remember if I ever made my profile identity public, even on the contrary I remember before that I was looking for whether the profile images can be made private but I didn't find it then but I forgot to ask in this place.
I'm asking because I suddenly remembered the thing again, but thanks anyway, this option never crossed my mind. 

Add another point here, you could also use the tools like shareX here you will need the API for set up the ShareX and for that you have to create an account. 

To be honest, while exploring this forum, I had to take screenshots hundreds of times and upload them manually to an image host site, then I copied and pasted the direct image link.
This is where ShareX and Postimages save me a lot of time, and I use these two tools continuously even now.

You noticed? Why did you not notice _act_'s comment? Albeit bit roundabout way than direct (which is clicking, 'Trust' right next to the profile), but it's more, 'universal' way since in some sections 'trust' is not shown next to profiles.

hahaha, verdade, tem certas pessoas que não precisam de muita coisa, conseguem se enforcar sozinhas, o Lules vai mexer num vespeiro, hoje as bets estão em todos os lugares, times, midia tradicional, absolutamente tudo, os caras vem girando a economia de certa forma, jogatina sempre vai existir, independente da decisão do presidente ou não... quero ver ele mexer com o jogo do bicho, que hoje é totalmente informatizado kkkk ai ele não quer né... enfim, presidente lules sempre em prol do povo brasileiro, cuidado dos pobres e fazendo a galera ter um café da manhã todos os dias na mesa.

não vejo a hora desse sujeito se aposentar e deixar o Brasil em PAZ.

Acho que IA rodando na blockchain pra ter rastros ja tem a bastante anos, mas imagino eu, com todos os mixers presentes la fora, quanto isso pode ser confiavel? No máximo pode ser um começo para depois os seres humanos (=policia) polirem as informações, espero que nunca se caia na fase dos processos geridos totalmente pela IA, que nem o suporte cliente do Uber.

Essa ultima frase me fez rir bastante. Pior que é verdade. Nem lembrava que o atual governo travou tudo em respeito ao IOF, e realmente, a pegada que a economia BR assume com esse tipo de imposto é bem protecionista.

Nao tinha um plano de 4-5 anos para zerar o IOF ou baixar muito ele? Ou era so IOF no cartão de credito e a de compra em divisa de outro estado vai ficar para sempre?

They are forgetting about it whenever the price of bitcoin slumps, they'll have to zoom out the charts to remind them that there's an upward trend for it in the long run.

While metric of it is the price and that's the majority of us looking at it, it's easier for those who don't understand it to analyze of how it is doing.

And that line graph going upwards speaks for itself on how the trend goes despite that we've been in several bear markets and other financial market corrections, it's still doing better than most of them.

Are we talking from a "cold perspective" or are we in a thread that relates to my bitcoin investing ideas?  Why would I give too many shits about "cold perspectives" if they seem to be failing/refusing to account for several of the various (and even basic) investment ideas that I have seemingly repeatedly gone over in this thread through the years?

At the same time, we are not talking about trading here.  Being motivated by the mere fact that your BTC holdings happen to be in profits seems to fall into the category of either trading or being lost from the perspective of this here cat.

Sure, there could be reasons that some guys might have less than a 10 year investment timeline in the event of age and/or health, yet really what would be the reason that you would be focusing on wanting to "take profits" merely because some portion of your bitcoin holdings happen to be "in profits"?


Fair enough that what you do and how you treat your bitcoin holdings relate to your perception of bitcoin and the strength of its investment thesis, which surely also relates to where you believe that the BTC price may or may not end up going... and surely it seems that any of us may well consider both upside and downside scenarios within any reasonable and prudent assessment of where we believe bitcoin prices may end up going as compared with other places that we might put our bitcoin value (whether investing or consumption).

By the way, your framing of "after a long few years from now" comes off as quite vague and even bordering upon meaningless - especially, since I specifically purposefully point out investing 4-10 years or longer, yet there are some underlying meanings to the way that I attempt to frame what I believe to be useful ways of considering bitcoin investment timelines, which I suppose could end up relating to whether we buy or we sell, yet it seems that so many guys who participate in this thread (which also seems to be you) seem to be quite early in their bitcoin accumulation process, so the selling portion of the consideration does not tend to become applicable since so many of the guys tend to be not even close to reaching enough bitcoin or even more than enough bitcoin.

At the same time, I surely can recognize and appreciate that even the concept of enough bitcoin or more than enough bitcoin could end up changing throughout the process of our bitcoin accumulation and/or even if we might have had come to assess that we had gotten through most of our bitcoin accumulation phase and entered into some form of maintenance phase (and I am not even go into the further stages of sustainable withdrawal and/or liquidation since those do not seem to be very relevant, even though they would end up starting to justify the selling of bitcoin - yet even maintenance phase could also start to trigger (or justify) abilities to sell some coins.. from the perspective of this here cat).


Yes.. You are showing your trading mindset and your trading way of framing matters.   After having several back and forth posts with me, haven't you at least done some back ground reading that might relate to the OP of this thread and/or various other threads that are linked in the OP?


Your story does not really add up.  Even a guy who had started buying $10 of bitcoin per week starting in January 2017 until now, he would have had invested $1,170 and his bitcoin holdings would be nearly 0.13 BTC, and surely that amount of BTC currently has value that is way over a couple of thousand dollars as you seem to be proclaiming to be the case with your supposedly "bitcoin guru" friend.

Do you have a bitcoin guru friend that would invest into bitcoin even more whimpily than $10 per month?  That does not seem accurate to me.


Sure.  Fair enough.  There are a lot of guys (including yours truly) who had ended up starting their bitcoin investment journey when bitcoin prices were at or near the top of the then cycle, and so if they continue to buy bitcoin, they likely end up in a quite good place some years down the road, even though in their beginning years, they may well have bitcoin holdings that are quite extensively in the negative (at least on paper) for a good amount of time before they either get to break even amounts (on paper) or even starting to be "in profits" as you seem to be inclined to focus on such "profits" as a motivator for yourself.

By the way, I am not too much of a subscriber to what seems to be relatively dumbass scenarios of guys who buy bitcoin at the top of the cycle and then  sit on their hands for several years waiting for their bitcoin holdings to get into profits.  

I understand that guys do dumbass shit, yet at the same time, in this thread, and in other places on the forum that I post, I am going to likely push back on any members who try to argue with me about scenarios about what I perceive to be dumbass guys who start their bitcoin investing journey at the top of the cycle and then sit on their hands for long periods of time waiting for their bitcoin holdings to "get back into profits."  Trolls, bitcoin naysayers, bitcoin trader, shitcoin pumpers and disingenuine posters seem to love to focus on scenarios of what dumbass people do in regards to buying at the top and sitting on their hands for long periods of time.


Some of your knowledge might be benefitted (and perhaps even benefit others too?) if you might read through some of the themes of this thread (starting from the various OPs), especially if you are wanting to purportedly share your knowledge in this thread.


There is no such thing as lump summing on the dip.

You are mixing up concepts when you are mixing terms like that, which likely makes it confusing for some other guys in terms of their own needs to make sure that they understand that buying the dip and lump sum are different concepts, and if you are mixing them up then guys are likely to get confused.

Even though guys can front load their bitcoin investment on dips, the way that you are using the expression "front load", you seem to be emphasizing buying the dip more than you are expressing some kind of meaningful understanding in regards to what frontloading into bitcoin tends to be in practice.

Throughout your post, it is just like you are randomly throwing various buzz words without really knowing what they mean or how to fit such buzzwords into a proper and meaningful description of what you are wanting to say, and in that regard, you even seem to get various of your buzzwords wrong in terms of whatever context that you ended up providing.


The ideas of these two paragraphs are largely correct, even though I frequently like to consider that managing our cashflows and deciding how much we are going to invest in bitcoin, save and/or discretionarily consume will ongoingly be influenced by our progress in building our bitcoin and our savings (back up funds), and so sure, if there might be some pay periods or even extended periods in which our income might end up going down and/or basic expenses end up going up, then we may well end up having to draw from our back up funds to cover our basic expenses.. which tend to be expenses that we cannot defer until our next pay period.  So the ideas that you contain in your second paragraph are not really incorrect, even though you mentioned discretionary consumption as if it were important in regards to the kinds of decisions that we might end up having to make in circumstances in which our income might be low and our basic expenses might go up.  I would speculate that anyone with any reasonable abilities to problem solve, he would have had already dropped his discretionary consumption during circumstances in which there are needs to tap into back up funds in order to cover basic expenses.. yet at the same time, if a person ends up having a lot of back up funds then they may well not be drawing their back up funds down to a low enough level in which it might have ended up becoming important to start to cut some or all of their discretionary consumption.


Having some kind of a presumption of privilege of combo strategy makes little to no sense, even if we might consider that you might be talking about an inability that many people have to actually employ either lump sum strategies and/or buy the dip strategies, since many normal people will largely be spending a lot of time merely relying upon their discretionary funds as they come in, and they may well not have very many circumstances in which either they have extra funds coming in and/or the quantity of the discretionary funds that they have available may well not amount to enough money in order to justify considering (or employing) either lump sum strategies or buy the dip strategies... so then if many folks are not really tending to get into situations in which lump sum and/or buy the dip starts to potentially make sense, they will tend to be much better off to largely stay focused on making sure that their ongoing DCA strategy (or regular BTC purchase amounts) remains appropriate for their income and/or cashflow situation.


I doubt that it is fair for you to assume or to presume that a bitcoin accumulator is accumulating more aggressively merely because he is deploying multiple strategies.  If you are ONLY relying on the fact that he is deploying more than one strategy and nothing else, then you do not have enough information to presume that he is being more aggressive as compared with someone who might be ONLY deploying DCA.  


That is not necessarily true.  Are you thinking about what you say or just making shit up?  I hear guys making these kinds of presumptions quite frequently, and they are not true if the ONLY thing that you know is that guy (1) is deploying DCA and guy (2) is deploying DCA, lump sum and buying the dip.  There is almost no way to know, without further details that guy 2 is being more aggressive (or smarter) than guy 1.  You seem to presume that guy 2 is smarter and/or more sophisticated than guy 1, which is also not true from the facts that we know about their differences.


Now you are getting really retarded if you believe that holding back funds in order to buy on the dip is more aggressive than regular DCA when more likely the opposite is true.

Face it.  You and some of the other guys who like to hold back money to buy dips that might not happen, you like to rationalize to yourself about your being smarter, more sophisticated and even more aggressive than a guy who is regularly, persistently, ongoing and consistently buying bitcoin.  Right?  

From my perspective, you kind of dip buying promoting guys are delusional and you are also spreading and promotiing incorrect information because you have a purpose to promote your own nonsense dip buying practices, while acting as if it is superior when the opposite tends to be true.


It sounds to me that you @Justbillywitt are bending over backwards to defend the dip buyer when such dip buyers do not really need any defense.

Most people that do doubt Bitcoin as a tool against inflation only consider short-term price movement, they don't usually look it in a long run because if they decide to look at it in a long run, they will know the truth and also know that no investment has goven more profits than Bitcoin investment in a long term since Bitcoin was created.
It is not too late to invest in Bitcoin because it is an investment that stores value, and holding for a long period of time will also give profit; the value it maintains is the reason why it always defeats inflation.

Ou seja, a estratégia de evitar as taxas de câmbio ou de evitar desvalorização da moeda, está a inflacionar os números?
Faz sentido.

A minha questão, o USDT também não paga impostos de mais valias ou coisa do género?

Those who doubt that Bitcoin cannot or is not worth fighting inflation are basically short-term thinkers or those who have invested in Bitcoin for the short term and have suffered losses due to volatility. Because I completely agree with what you said. If we look at the market from the past of Bitcoin to the present, we will see that every person has benefited a lot by investing in Bitcoin and Bitcoin has become one of the best assets to fight inflation.

Many people may say that they will invest in gold, yes they can invest in gold, but Bitcoin has become a much better asset than gold at present and if a person invests in Bitcoin, he will definitely benefit much more than gold if he is able to hold it in the long term.

Bitcoin is said to be a hedge against inflation, and that's not just a claim; it's based on Bitcoin's price history, which has increased over time. Don't look at it in the short term, but you need to look at it in the long term because short-term price movements can be volatile and may not reflect its performance as a long-term asset. But if you look at it in the long run, you can see that Bitcoin's price tends to go up. If you want proof, you can check out this picture:


https://bitcoindata.science/dca-calculator

Sim, provavelmente será algo que possa surgir daqui a uns 3 ou 4 anos.

Mas, se esta na ideia, vai surgir. Até porque ao que parece, é uma ideia que agrada a maioria dos Estados membros.

Maybe you can also post statistics how much customers are using new coins you listed.

I didnt notice this change, but than again I was not play so much dice games to notice this.
Bitcoin is probably still used the most, amd that is normal since it was as added first.

Obrigado pelos méritos  , ultimamente andam bem escassos pro meu lado  , bem, eu infelizmente não tenho a quantidade suficiente de méritos para me candidatar nessa campanha da duelbits, lá precisam de 50 méritos nos ultimos 120 dias e eu tenho apenas 19...

e @alegotardo o motivo principal é que não curto muito trocar de campanhas e o outro é por conta dos méritos mesmo, como disse antes, não me enquadro atualmente na inscrição desta campanha.

Houve contribuição dos ETFs, mas boa parte foi por conta de compradores "PF" (Spot). O fluxo de ETF de um mês atrás era de 1.25M, hoje já são 1.28M, um pequeno aumento de 2.14%. Eles ajudaram mas não foram apenas eles. Esse relatório do Glassnode explica com alguns detalhes e fala também sobre dinheiro novo entrando mesmo com BTC a esse preço.

22 de agosto:


22 de setembro:


fonte: https://charts.checkonchain.com/btconchain/etfs/etf_balance_0/etf_balance_0_light.html

Maybe you just overlook this feature, but it's always been there. Even in your previous bump on this thread, this feature was just sitting there waiting for you to be clicked 

I also checked my previous review that happened last July, but unfortunately I did not put an image to Dice. Lol

Não leva diretamente com ele, mas acaba por levar por tabela.

Esta longe, mas como faz parte da NATO, tem de se envolver.
Esta longe, mas tem um acordo com os EUA para eles usarem a base aérea das Lages, acaba por se envolver.

Mas, sim, de modo geral é mais seguro de outros lugares da Europa.

Os preços dos combustíveis, não param de subir. Esta semana atingiu o preço histórico, com medias a rondar os 2.25€/litro.

Ao que tudo indica, em Outubro, tudo irá aumentar de forma significativa.

O BCE, decidiu também aumentar as taxas, para controlar a inflação, mas praticamente não esta a fazer efeito. Porque desceram muito pouco desde que subiram, apos Covid.

Por isso, vai ficar complicado, os próximos meses.

Pelo que li, a "culpa" é dos ETFs novamente... entrou "apenas" ~$433 milhões, mas é claro que isso é reação de mercado, não é o motivo... talvez essa questão que o @bitmover falou seja o mais plausível mesmo.

E a alta de juros do FED? Pelo que li fazia tempo que não subiam (uns 2 ou 3 anos)... isso deveria ter efeito contrário, mas será que estão "com medo" das consequências!?
Será que uma guerra está terminando e alguém teve informação privilegiada?

Enfim... poderia cair um pouco novamente, antes de continuar subindo, quem sabe a Strategy também não reage e anuncia mais uma compra em breve para atiçar ainda mais o mercado.

Over the last few days I’ve made a few updates to my tool; one of these was the board overview feature.
Today, having imported the board_ids, I think the results are fairly consistent, although not 100 per cent.
Unfortunately, many topics and posts have been deleted over time, and I’ve had difficulty recovering many of them.

It’s now possible to download data from the tool in BBCode (beta version – I’m still working on improving the layout), Markdown and CSV formats.

Here are two examples of this board’s overview; please let me know what you think.

Thanks in advance to everyone.

BBCODE EXAMPLE

Posts: 472

Merits: 544

Users: 155

Topics: 38

---

POSTERS	RECEIVERS	SENDERS	IMPACT
1. joker_josue [31]	1. promise444c5 [71]	1. vapourminer [130]	1. promise444c5 [110.0]
2. LoyceV [23]	2. TryNinja [39]	2. LoyceV [48]	2. TryNinja [63.5]
3. nutildah [14]	3. LoyceV [29]	3. nutildah [33]	3. LoyceV [55.0]
4. DYING_S0UL [14]	4. joker_josue [26]	4. PowerGlove [31]	4. joker_josue [54.5]
5. notocactus [13]	5. nutildah [24]	5. JayJuanGee [23]	5. nutildah [43.0]
6. snipie [11]	6. FinneysTrueVision [24]	6. EFS [22]	6. FinneysTrueVision [38.5]
7. *Ace* [11]	7. DYING_S0UL [16]	7. Xal0lex [21]	7. DYING_S0UL [31.0]
8. antialbon [10]	8. NotATether [14]	8. joker_josue [16]	8. NotATether [25.0]
9. TryNinja [10]	9. PrivacyG [14]	9. Don Pedro Dinero [15]	9. *Ace* [25.0]
10. alegotardo [9]	10. *Ace* [13]	10. fillippone [15]	10. notocactus [24.5]

---

#	From	To	Merit	Tx
1	vapourminer	promise444c5	21	3
2	EFS	promise444c5	20	1
3	LoyceV	promise444c5	12	1
4	Don Pedro Dinero	Sterlino	10	1
5	vapourminer	joker_josue	9	9
6	PowerGlove	LoyceV	9	5
7	fillippone	*Ace*	9	3
8	vapourminer	TryNinja	8	5
9	Xal0lex	TryNinja	8	2
10	*Ace*	LoyceV	6	4

---

---

#	User	Posts	Score	Rep
1	PowerGlove	1	8.71	#2
2	fillippone	8	8.24	#7
3	LoyceV	23	7.84	#14
4	GazetaBitcoin	2	7.75	#17
5	nutildah	14	7.55	#23
6	cygan	1	7.55	#24
7	NotATether	8	7.47	#34
8	Cricktor	3	7.47	#33
9	TryNinja	10	7.40	#37
10	LFC_Bitcoin	1	7.37	#39
11	Rikafip	8	7.36	#41
12	vapourminer	2	7.36	#42
13	hosemary	2	7.32	#45
14	JayJuanGee	1	7.30	#46
15	ABCbits	1	7.24	#55
16	dkbit98	6	7.14	#68
17	bitmover	5	6.96	#82
18	PrivacyG	5	6.89	#90
19	lovesmayfamilis	2	6.88	#91
20	stompix	2	6.83	#97

---

Unfortunately, Markdown formatting isn’t supported on BitcoinTalk, but don’t worry – I’ve worked out a way to show it to you by creating a special tool just for you 

Board Overview: Meta Period: 2026-09-14 - 2026-09-21

Olha que te falo que se houver um airdrop, não deve ter que ter stake não
Aliás, acho que da própria Jumper não tem stake

Serviços como a Jumper tem mais probabilidades de recompensar mais ( novamente em um possível airdrop) usuários que tem mais tempo usando o serviço, mais volume, mais txs, mais bridges e por aí vai

Confesso que estou com alguma esperança hehe, sair uns 1k dolares de presente seria top demais

bitmover has created a DCA strategy simulation tool/calculator. Eliminate doubts and guesswork in direct testing
https://bitcoindata.science/dca-calculator

Honestly, its best used as almost as a step-by-step assistant rather than having it code massive things all at once. If you keep the scope small and somewhat compartmentalized it seems really good but if you give it a massive scope, then even now it seems insufficient. It is also only as good as the prompts you give it.

Spinly.io is a Next-gen crypto iGaming platform with 4000+ games. Spinly.io supports 15+ cryptocurrencies + buying crypto with credit cards. Its gamified loyalty program spans 20 tiers, rewarding players with cashback, bonuses, and other perks as they progress. Spinly emphasizes responsible gaming through its "Aura" system, allowing players to set personal limits and monitor their gaming habits. Spinly.io presents a free raffle for the Bitcointalk community.

---

---

  ✦ Rules:

      ⚡ You must be a Member to participate.
      ⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 50. You can pick two if you have posted in Spinly ANN in last 30 days.
      ⚡ Three winners will share $50 in Bitcoin, the reward has 2x wagering requirement (1x if you use the tracking link from this thread).
      ⚡ Reward will be credited to your Spinly.io account.
      ⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
      ⚡ I and Spinly.io reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
   

    ✦ Application format:
    
    ✦ List of participants:

---

🎰 Bitz.io is a crypto-first online casino and sportsbook that launched in 2023 with a bold, player-focused approach. Bitz, known for its sleek interface and lightning-fast payouts, offers over 4,000 games, including slots, live tables, and sports betting options. Bitz.io is presenting a free raffle for the community.

---

---

  ✦ Rules:

      ⚡ You must be a Member to participate.
      ⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
      ⚡ Three winners will share $65 in Bitcoin* The prize has 2x wagering requirement. 1x wagering requirement if you use the tracking link from this thread to sign up..
      ⚡ Reward will be credited to your Bitz.io account.
      ⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
      ⚡ I and Bitz.io reserve the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
   

    ✦ Application format:
    
    ✦ List of participants:

---

Even your framing of the whole matter is from a trading perspective.  

Of course, if we are buying bitcoin and we have a 4-10 year or longer timeline, we are going to expect much of our bitcoin holdings (if not all of it) to be largely in profits, meaning that the price that we bought is much lower than the current price, yet it seems that perhaps our goal might be related to how much bitcoin that we had been able to accumulate over that timeframe rather than our ability to completely sell all of our bitcoin because it happens to be "in profits."

Yes.  Factually, selling higher than we buy is trading, yet this thread is not about trading, so why do we even need to consider trading, since it is not really part of what we are practicing or what we are doing, especially in relation to what we are talking about in this investment thread.


Sure.  These kinds of dumb behaviors happen, yet are they very relevant to us, except maybe realizing what we could end up being tempted into doing, but we are not going to do those kinds of things since we are training ourselves to develop bitcoin buying practices that keep us ongoingly buying rather than waiting for the BTC price to go up in the short term.  Also we may well not even care which direction the BTC price goes in the short term, including that if the BTC price ends up going down, then we realize that we are getting more bitcoin for the same amount of dollars (fiat), and even if the BTC price goes up or down, we are still buying on a regular basis.

In the beginning, we are ongoingly building our bitcoin holdings and our back up funds, so hopefully there would not be too much concern for BTC prices since maybe for 1-2 years or even longer we would be ongoingly building our bitcoin holdings and our back up funds, so then after a few years of building up the bitcoin stash and the back up funds, then we might start to consider the extent to which changes in the BTC price might make a difference for how we employ our buys.

Personally, I have my doubts about any need to really alter our focus on ongoing and consistent buys until maybe at some point after we had put 1 year or more of the size of our expenses (and perhaps even the size of our income) into our bitcoin holdings, and so if we have one year of our expenses (or 1 year of our target income) into bitcoin, then surely changes in the bitcoin price is going to have greater effects on the overall value of the bitcoin that is in our holdings.

Let's say, for example, that a guy has an income of $30k per year and his expenses are in the ballpark of $20k per year, so perhaps if he is investing somewhere in the ballpark of $100 per week, then after 1 year of investing, he has invested $5,200 and after 4 years of investing, he has reached $20,800, which is 1 year of his expenses, and after 6 years he had invested $31,200 which is one year of his income.  

At 4 years and 6 years this particular guy has reached certain bitcoin accumulation target levels that could contribute towards his rethinking the extent to which he might want to change his strategy, and sure during a period of 4 years or 6 years, the bitcoin price would have had likely changed quite a bit through out that period... so in the last 4 years, the BTC price had various levels that were between $15,470 and $126,272, and so maybe if we had been accumulating steady for 4 years our average cost per BTC might be around $46k, even though the current BTC price is $81k.

Of course, if we had been accumulating for 6 years, our numbers would be different since the timeline is longer, even though only in the beginning of the period in late 2020 were the BTC prices lower than $15,470.. perhaps just going down to around $10,500-ish.  yet, our average cost per BTC in the past 6 years would have had been around $39k, so the average cost per BTC is not really very much lower, even though from the hypothetical that I gave there would have had been a whole year of income put into bitcoin as compared with the 4 year example in which a whole year of expenses had been put into bitcoin.

Frequently, when we start to get to the higher levels of bitcoin accumulation, such as having more than a year of expenses or more than a year of income into bitcoin, we might start to consider the extent that we have accumulated enough bitcoin or more than enough bitcoin and we might start to consider whether we should adjust our bitcoin accumulating strategies.

Personally, I consider profits to be less of a consideration to such an investor as compared with what he is able to do with the amount of BTC that he had already accumulated, and surely there can be questions about whether to just keep buying bitcoin blindly with regularity and consistency, or whether he might want to consider adjusting how he buys, such as trying to strategize around the BTC price and where he believes the BTC price might go, yet it also seems that in either case, whether his average cost per BTC is around $46k under the 4 year scenario or around $39k under the 6 year scenario, I doubt that he would be concerning himself very much with small moves in the bitcoin price, and he may well consider that it still remains to his advantage to merely consider his budget and whether continuing to invest $100 per week is a good practice or if he might choose to change his amount based on any aspects of changes in his budget (changes in his income and/or changes in his expenses).


Well?  At least you brought the ideas of your post back to investing, even though you spent quite a bit of your framing on the ideas of trading and profit ideas, which it seems that you cannot help yourself to think about profits rather than thinking about ongoing accumulation.


I have been through a few dips that were quite low and long lasting, and it seems to me that my first dip was the hardest to deal with since my BTC holdings were also in the negative, so in the 2014 to 2015 period, my average cost per bitcoin went from $600 down to nearly $400 - since I continued to buy during that period, yet the bitcoin price had gone down below $200 on a couple of occasions, so there were times that my bitcoin holdings were more than 65% in the negative, yet since I kept buying bitcoin during that period, my cost per BTC continued to go down, yet it was still frustrating to have BTC holdings in the negative, and it was also still quite difficult to continue to buy during periods like that, since in some sense, I was also considering that I had already put enough or more than enough into bitcoin, so it was difficult to justify putting more value into bitcoin.

Of course, for me, selling was out of the question, especially since I had already told myself that I was putting in money that I could afford to lose, so I was not using money that I needed, yet at the same time, the money that I put in kept going down in value.

By the way, these days I proclaim that my average cost per BTC is somewhere in the ballpark of $1k to $2k per BTC, so even though we might have low average costs per BTC and also have had times that we were bringing down our average costs per BTC, mistakes can also be made at various points in the bitcoin accumulation (and/or maintenance) journey.

Yeah, I know about the gold market and all that, but it's just how I see things under my control, and with BTC I prefer to hold everything under my possession now. But I will give it a try as well, thanks for mentioning.

That's a good idea to add a gold DCA calculator. If it defeats the purpose of the site, you can create a mirror site or another site if it stays in budget! But yeah, it might not get the same kind of traffic from here, so.

I will bookmark this site, TBH I was using the site for AltcoinsTalks for mentioning them, then for some time I started to face problems, and then I moved to another bot. It was when that forum was not allowing scraping maybe, it was a long time ago. Now it works fine.

Autor: notocactus
Hilo en inglés: [Mega resources for newbies] Check here, find most of your need, before asking.

---

Notas

• Los newbies hacen demasiadas preguntas repetidas, y este hilo está aquí, en el tablero de Ayuda, para ayudarles a encontrar las Q&A más básicas, sin preguntar.
• Espero que este hilo pueda ayudar a reducir dichas preguntas, al menos puede ayudar de algún modo.
• Sé que algunos newbies no harán caso de este hilo, pero dejémosles vivir.
• El hilo está en elaboración, y aún no está terminado
• Está bloqueado temporalmente, para evitar el spam. Lo desbloquearé cuando esté terminado.

---

Índice

• Temas relacionados con el foro
• Herramientas creadas por la comunidad del foro
• Libros sobre Bitcoin
• Recursos para el aprendizaje
• Wallets
• Herramientas para scripts de Bitcoin, debugs, descriptors
• Spot ETFs de Bitcoin
• Problemas de seguridad
• Apuestas
• Sevicios y Trabajos

Temas relacionados con el foro


Herramientas creadas por la comunidad del foro



Campañas de firmas y avatar creadas por la comunidad


Libros sobre Bitcoin
* Los enlaces a descargas de algunos libros se han tomado de [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Los enlaces pueden romperse en cualquier momento, depende de Maus0728.

Recursos para el aprendizaje


Wallets

---

Traducción ofrecida a iniciativa de:

Autor: notocactus
Hilo en inglés: [Mega resources for newbies] Check here, find most of your need, before asking.

---

Notes

• Newbies ask many repeated questions, and this thread is here, in Beginners & Help board, to help them finding most basic Q&A, without asking.
• I hope this thread can help to reduce such questions, at least it can help somewhat.
• I do know some newbies will not care about this thread, but let them be.
• The thread is composing, not completed yet.
• It's temporarily locked, to avoid spam. I will unlock it when it is finished.

---

Table of contents

• Forum related topics
• Forum community-built tools
• Bitcoin books
• Learning resources
• Wallets
• Tools for Bitcoin scripts, debugs, descriptors
• Bitcoin Spot ETFs
• Security issues
• Gambling
• Sevices & Jobs

Forum-related topics


Forum community-built tools



Community-led signature & avatar campaigns


Bitcoin books
* Downloadable links for some books are taken from [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Links can be dead anytime depends on Maus0728.

Learning Resources


Wallets

---

Traducción ofrecida a iniciativa de: