Last update: 2026-09-14_Mon_16.18h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
bitmover receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. bitmover
2. FeeBuddy
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "bitmover" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67142652 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 16:14:07 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Is it possible to add a delete button just after image upload.??
Didn't it have that feature when it was just launched? I remember seeing it.
2. Post 67142587 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Sep 14 15:57:43 CEST 2026) in [ANN] Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager:
Can I give you more work?
How cool would it be if that "button" was an image, and the image showed information (Shift-Reload required) that counts down until the desired Bitcoin block, and after that shows the Results in the image?
3. Post 67140886 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 23:57:19 CEST 2026) in Priamex ♻️ FREE raffle #7 welcome round | Prize pool $30, Winner takes all!:
Sad to see only one entry in this round.
Let's go with the block height 966870
Unfortunately there are no winners.
Verify.
4. Post 67140654 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 22:45:13 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :
[edited out]
I would recommend at least two steps: using an hardware wallet that hasn’t been using subpar practice, this mean avoid ledger, at least, and using one that supports your own entropy to generate the seed, via dice rolling, for example.
This, before moving to a multivendor, multi sign setup.
I have seen a lot of folks jumping into the promotion of multi-signature, multi-vendor and/or various forms of collaborative custody, which I find to be potentially overly complicated.
And, yeah, perhaps many of us have lost a decent amount of confidence regarding the ways that seeds have been generated, so then there are some kinds of hardware wallets that allow us to add our own entropy. I also have gained confidence in the use of passphrases, so I think that a passphrase that is at least 12 characters of numbers, letters, capital and symbols would likely provide enough difficulty to make it quite secure, and sure you could add several more characters if you want a bit more difficulty in your passphrase.
...A long and complex passphrase is still non-hackable with today's technology. If a Coldcard-generated seed was additionally protected with a complex passphrase, the BTC would probably not be among the +1500 coins that got stolen. Some 2 and 3-word passphrases got bruteforced. An 8-word passphrase wouldn't be. An 8-word passphrase with numbers, lowercase & uppercase letters, and special characters even less so.
These are two different things and in one case your bitcoin are at risk (like here with coldcard scam...) :
-passphrase or password (bip38) would not help you at all.
Of course a passphrase would have had helped, and it is almost impossible to break into a passphrase that has 12 characters or more that are combined with numbers, letters, upper case and characters.
A custom password used to encrypt and lock a single Bitcoin private key into a secure 58-character string
-extra-word or bip39 (that is not a password but literally part of the seed) yes it's an extra word and not the password it would be used.
Yes a very long string could help but at this point I don't see any reason to have those risks and rely on a third party for a seed generation.
If you choose a sufficiently complex passphrase of 12 characters or more, you have a lot of protections, so I don't see why you are proclaiming such efforts to be futile.
By the way, if I thought that my initial 12 seed words were vulnerable, then surely I would regenerate them and not stick with ONLY the passphrase as a protection, so surely it is better to have the 12-24 seedwords and the passphrase also rather than merely relying on one of them.
In the end a passphrase must be stored like apart of the seed, adding some complexity.
For sure, it is way simpler than a multisig, with all the required seed conservation isssues.
I am not sure the larger part of the self custody community is ready for that. I have doubt on myself included.
5. Post 67140231 (unedited backup) (by Crypto Library) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 20:15:13 CEST 2026) in [Userscript] Automatically Converts copy/pasted URLs to [url=...]Text[/url]:
I was going to suggest using CTRL+SHIFT+V or CTRL+ALT+V for the url with the bbcode. Or even a new paste button in the forum page.
But you already solved slightly different
I would also going to suggest this in this case, because sometimes I had to face problems due to direct CTRL+V, many times, when I wanted to give the direct links, I had to remove BBCode Tags like
... again manually.
So I think this CTRL+SHIFT+V option is better than Url formatter on/off button.
Anyway, what else can I suggest, since now the artificial intelligence era
so I customized the PX-Z script through chatgpt. Hope this will be helpful.
// ==UserScript==
// @name Bitcointalk Paste URL Formatter
// @namespace https://bitcointalk.org/
// @version 1.4
// @description Formats pasted URLs as [url=URL]change_text[/url] BBCode using Ctrl+Shift+V. Works with highlighted/selected text. Press Ctrl+Shift+U to enable or disable.
// @match https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post*
// @grant none
// @author PX-Z
// @license MIT
// ==/UserScript==
(function () {
'use strict';
function addStyles() {
const style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = `
#url_formatter_note_text {
padding: 3px 15px;
border: 1px solid #e2cf6b;
background: #fffbe4;
}
#url_formatter_toggle {
margin-left: 8px;
}
`;
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
let enabled = true;
// Used to detect Ctrl+Shift+V before the paste event
let formatterPaste = false;
// Update the note text
function updateNote() {
const noteText = document.querySelector('#url_formatter_note_text');
if (!noteText) {
return;
}
noteText.innerHTML = enabled
? 'Note: URL Formatter is ON. Press Ctrl+Shift+V to format URL. Or click <a href="#" id="url_formatter_toggle">Disable</a>'
: 'Note: URL Formatter is OFF. Press Ctrl+Shift+U to enable. Or click <a href="#" id="url_formatter_toggle">Enable</a>';
const toggle = document.querySelector('#url_formatter_toggle');
if (toggle) {
toggle.addEventListener('click', function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
updateNote();
});
}
}
// Add note after #lock_warning
function addNote() {
const lockWarning = document.querySelector('#lock_warning');
if (!lockWarning) {
return;
}
// Prevent duplicate note
if (document.querySelector('#url_formatter_note')) {
return;
}
const noteRow = document.createElement('tr');
noteRow.id = 'url_formatter_note';
noteRow.innerHTML = `
<td></td>
<td align="left">
<span id="url_formatter_note_text"></span>
</td>
`;
lockWarning.insertAdjacentElement('afterend', noteRow);
updateNote();
}
// Keyboard shortcuts
document.addEventListener('keydown', function (e) {
// Ctrl + Shift + U = Enable / Disable Formatter
if (
e.ctrlKey &&
e.shiftKey &&
e.key.toLowerCase() === 'u'
) {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
updateNote();
return;
}
// Ctrl + Shift + V = Special URL Formatter Paste
if (
e.ctrlKey &&
e.shiftKey &&
e.key.toLowerCase() === 'v'
) {
formatterPaste = true;
}
});
// Reset formatterPaste if Ctrl+Shift+V is not followed by paste
document.addEventListener('keyup', function (e) {
if (e.key.toLowerCase() === 'v') {
setTimeout(function () {
formatterPaste = false;
}, 100);
}
});
// Handle paste
document.addEventListener('paste', function (e) {
// Only process Ctrl + Shift + V
if (!formatterPaste) {
return;
}
// Reset immediately
formatterPaste = false;
// Do nothing when disabled
if (!enabled) {
return;
}
const target = e.target;
// Only handle textareas
if (!(target instanceof HTMLTextAreaElement)) {
return;
}
const text = e.clipboardData.getData('text/plain').trim();
// Only process a single HTTP/HTTPS URL
if (!/^https?:\/\/\S+$/i.test(text)) {
return;
}
// Get selected text
const start = target.selectionStart;
const end = target.selectionEnd;
const selectedText = target.value.substring(start, end);
// Stop normal paste
e.preventDefault();
let bbcode;
if (start !== end) {
// Use selected text as anchor text
bbcode = `[url=${text}]${selectedText}[/url]`;
} else {
// No selected text
bbcode = `[url=${text}]change_text[/url]`;
}
// Insert BBCode
target.setRangeText(
bbcode,
start,
end,
'end'
);
// Notify site's JavaScript that the textarea changed
target.dispatchEvent(new Event('input', {
bubbles: true
}));
});
// MutationObserver
const observer = new MutationObserver(function () {
addNote();
});
observer.observe(document.body, {
childList: true,
subtree: true
});
// Initial check
addNote();
addStyles();
})();
On my side it is perfectly work for me but if anything need to change PX-Z can add it up
Anyway, Thanks to PX-Z, it's really useful tool
6. Post 67140011 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 18:59:02 CEST 2026) in Large-scale coldcard compromise underway. 600 BTC drained so far :
[edited out]
I would recommend at least two steps: using an hardware wallet that hasn’t been using subpar practice, this mean avoid ledger, at least, and using one that supports your own entropy to generate the seed, via dice rolling, for example.
This, before moving to a multivendor, multi sign setup.
I have seen a lot of folks jumping into the promotion of multi-signature, multi-vendor and/or various forms of collaborative custody, which I find to be potentially overly complicated.
And, yeah, perhaps many of us have lost a decent amount of confidence regarding the ways that seeds have been generated, so then there are some kinds of hardware wallets that allow us to add our own entropy. I also have gained confidence in the use of passphrases, so I think that a passphrase that is at least 12 characters of numbers, letters, capital and symbols would likely provide enough difficulty to make it quite secure, and sure you could add several more characters if you want a bit more difficulty in your passphrase.
...A long and complex passphrase is still non-hackable with today's technology. If a Coldcard-generated seed was additionally protected with a complex passphrase, the BTC would probably not be among the +1500 coins that got stolen. Some 2 and 3-word passphrases got bruteforced. An 8-word passphrase wouldn't be. An 8-word passphrase with numbers, lowercase & uppercase letters, and special characters even less so.
These are two different things and in one case your bitcoin are at risk (like here with coldcard scam...) :
-passphrase or password (bip38) would not help you at all.
Of course a passphrase would have had helped, and it is almost impossible to break into a passphrase that has 12 characters or more that are combined with numbers, letters, upper case and characters.
A custom password used to encrypt and lock a single Bitcoin private key into a secure 58-character string
-extra-word or bip39 (that is not a password but literally part of the seed) yes it's an extra word and not the password it would be used.
Yes a very long string could help but at this point I don't see any reason to have those risks and rely on a third party for a seed generation.
If you choose a sufficiently complex passphrase of 12 characters or more, you have a lot of protections, so I don't see why you are proclaiming such efforts to be futile.
By the way, if I thought that my initial 12 seed words were vulnerable, then surely I would regenerate them and not stick with ONLY the passphrase as a protection, so surely it is better to have the 12-24 seedwords and the passphrase also rather than merely relying on one of them.
7. Post 67139630 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 16:25:01 CEST 2026) in Test - do not delete please:
🎰 Grailbet is an online casino and sports betting platform offering a wide variety of gaming and wagering options. The platform features an extensive casino library—including video slots, live dealer games, table games, and proprietary "Grail Originals"—alongside a comprehensive sportsbook covering major sports like soccer, basketball, tennis, and e-sports. Registered in Saint Lucia and licensed in Anjouan, Grailbet supports modern crypto payments, rewards programs, and regular promotions for both casino and sports bettors. Grailbet.com is presenting a free raffle for the community.
Prize
1st: $25
2nd: $15
3rd: $10
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
⚡ Three winners will
share $50 in Bitcoin* The prize has 2x wagering requirement. 1x wagering requirement if you use the tracking link from this thread to sign up..
⚡ Reward will be credited to your
Grailbet account.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ I and
Grailbet reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format: Grailbet Username:
Slot number:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
8. Post 67139306 (unedited backup) (by aoluain) (scraped on Sun Sep 13 14:17:25 CEST 2026) in Fear Bitcoin, Buy Gold from me:
I really don't have any issue with Gold and believe it isn't bad to add to one's portfolio
I am not negative towards Gold either and I guess that a lot of Bitcoiners also have Gold in
whatever they deem as a portfolio.
in the same time this continue deny of the value of bitcoin and its economy. Probably it's just a way to troll the community and obtain some visibility.
or that he deep down believes/realises that Bitcoin does actually have value but he cannot
say that in public because it goes against his business model
I do have to say that I found it interesting about his commentry on all the other points he makes
about the state of the US economy.
Schiff is very intelligent and has made brilliant analysis over the last few years.
I also believe so, I did mention that I found his points about the US economy interesting.
He has talked non sense about gold outperforms Bitcoin.
With me, this short video and answer from Peter Schiff is enough to make him failed in attempt to shill gold against Bitcoin. With Bitcoin, there is no need to assess it is a real bitcoin by any third party company.
Saying Gold has outperformed BTC is nonsense, makes no sense to me, so brother, that's not the problem. The problem is he thinks BTC
and he also gets to slate Bitcoin at every opportunity and because he is seen as this Gold tycoon
it can be seen that hs is an authority in all things Bitcoin, so everyone should listen to him.
9. Post 67136774 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 15:58:02 CEST 2026) in Bitz.io || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $65 Prize Pool 💰:
🎰 Bitz.io is a crypto-first online casino and sportsbook that launched in 2023 with a bold, player-focused approach. Bitz, known for its sleek interface and lightning-fast payouts, offers over 4,000 games, including slots, live tables, and sports betting options. Bitz.io is presenting a free raffle for the community.
Prize
1st: $30
2nd: $20
3rd: $15
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
⚡ Three winners will
share $65 in Bitcoin* The prize has 2x wagering requirement. 1x wagering requirement if you use the tracking link from this thread to sign up..
⚡ Reward will be credited to your
Bitz.io account.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ I and
Bitz.io reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format: Bitz.io Username:
Slot number:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
10. Post 67136764 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 15:53:49 CEST 2026) in Spinly.io 🎰 || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $50 Prize Pool 💰:
Spinly.io is a Next-gen crypto iGaming platform with 4000+ games. Spinly.io supports 15+ cryptocurrencies + buying crypto with credit cards. Its gamified loyalty program spans 20 tiers, rewarding players with cashback, bonuses, and other perks as they progress. Spinly emphasizes responsible gaming through its "Aura" system, allowing players to set personal limits and monitor their gaming habits. Spinly.io presents a free raffle for the Bitcointalk community.
Prize
1st: $25
2nd: $15
3rd: $10
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 30.
⚡ Three winners will
share $50 in Bitcoin, the reward has 2x wagering requirement (1x if you use the tracking link from this thread).
⚡ Reward will be credited to your
Spinly.io account.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ I and
Spinly.io reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format: Spinly.io username:
Slot number:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
11. Post 67136362 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 13:16:43 CEST 2026) in Test - do not delete please:
♻️ EagleSwap is a non-custodial, privacy-focused cryptocurrency exchange platform designed to enable fast, cross-chain crypto swaps without requiring account registration or KYC verification. Operating across more than 150 supported coins and tokens, the service allows users to exchange assets directly between external wallet addresses using either real-time floating rates or locked-in fixed rates, all while maintaining total control over their funds. EagleSwap is presenting a free raffle for the community.
Prize
1st: $25
2nd: $15
3rd: $10
╔══════
✦ Rules: ⚡ You must be a
Member to participate.
⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
⚡ Three winners will
share $50 in Bitcoin* ⚡ Reward will be sent to your Bitcoin wallet.
⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's
Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
⚡ God Of Thunder and
EagleSwap reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.
══════╝
✦ Application format:Slot number:
bech32 address:
✦ List of participants:
Professionally managed by;
12. Post 67136121 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 11:23:44 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 203:
HostFat (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (19) 10522 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 24140:
qwk (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5789 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1769 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11452 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4810 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 2889 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 3672 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2794 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (4) 10119 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 6949 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 9005 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2194 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +56 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6291 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2634 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2202 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (14) 6839 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (37) 1952 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2390 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 13942 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6272 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 6817 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 6995 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +7 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (26) 3953 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 10807 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 769 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 4502 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 4040 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 11537 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 12187 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 395806:
o_solo_miner (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2943 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4728 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 6374 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3159 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 533583:
Lucius (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 6756 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 10516 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 1417 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2267 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3989 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1368 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3738 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1349 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 7039 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +18 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 2077 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2351 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 5159 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 4672 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2370 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3765 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +87 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (40) 13384 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1496 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2393 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2114 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 2668 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3689 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 7713 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 11378 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1634314:
shahzadafzal (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 3535 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4332 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1825672:
morvillz7z (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2217 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3530 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 21410 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3124 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2620 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 2612 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 5847 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 5837 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +50 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 3809 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 1913 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1667 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4190 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5775 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 8321 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 10264 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1652 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5395 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2745549:
decodx (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 983 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 10094 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6525 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1300 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3640 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 3558380:
Mia Chloe (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2288 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (
8881 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
935 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
15100 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
50 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
193 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 4528:
Matt Corallo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 10354:
JJG (
Trust: neutral) (
10 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. Post 67136007 (unedited backup) (by Cricktor) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 10:24:56 CEST 2026) in 2.62x BTC dumped to legacy address of Genesis block:
Time for another update, this time with three entries that came in yesterday in a tight time window. All three very likely sent by the same entity because the change output from the previous transaction were used as one of inputs in the next one.
Past March 14th, 2025 largeequal/over 500k sats transfers to Genesis block descriptor:
Current balance at time of this post according to
combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50
BTC of coinbase tx: 107.47971437
BTC (includes pending 3672sats waiting for confirmation, the difference (0.03958766
BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transactions are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).
This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptorsee below accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt
14. Post 67135349 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 01:26:19 CEST 2026) in Rede Liquid do Bitcoin hackeada em 4000 BITCOINS:
Sim, é uma prática para incentivar esse trabalho.. ninguém vai ficar testando código de graça..
O cara também trocou os pés pelas mãos.. deveria primeiro ter negociado, depois enviado o dinheiro
vamos ver se algum dia liberaram aquelas conversas fechadas.
O Bitcointalk também tem um programa:
https://bitcointalk.org/sbounties.phpQueria saber se alguém já rodou uma dessas IAs recentes para verificar a segurança do fórum.
esse não é nenhum white hacker. É um hacker que elaborou um esquema para explorar um bug e obter dinheiro limpo.
Estão chamando ele de grey hat.. um meio termo
acho que a definição cai bem.
15. Post 67135328 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Sat Sep 12 01:16:25 CEST 2026) in Rede Liquid do Bitcoin hackeada em 4000 BITCOINS:
Pode até ter esse premio, mas esse premio é para dar quando o bug é descoberto e comunicado a empresa, sem ser explorado ou tornado publico.
Mesmo não tendo, esse premio, será que o hacker comunicou que sabia de um bug antes de retirar o BTC? Parece que não.
Uma coisa é eu dizer que você tem uma falha no site e pedir um premio por isso, outra é ir lá roubar e depois dizer que devolve se você me pagar. Isso é chantagem, e mesmo que a empresa tenha bug bounty nunca irá pagar nesse cenário.
Podemos dizer que como não tem bug bounty, o hacker quis primeiro provar que sabia do bug. Sim, podia ter feito isso e só retirar 1BTC. Mas, não, ele tirou 4000x mais.
Por isso, para mim, esse não é nenhum white hacker. É um hacker que elaborou um esquema para explorar um bug e obter dinheiro limpo.
16. Post 67134529 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 21:04:56 CEST 2026) in Aqua wallet - Bitcoin, Lightning, Liquid:
I have a few bucks ($ 30) in bitcoin mainnet in aqua wallet. I converted it from LN long ago. They are still available after this hack.
I will move them to my main mobile wallet.
That would be a good idea, but I would also suggest converting LN back to bitcoin mainnet.
I see holding anything on lightning network as much more risky than it was holding it in liquid assets.
Time will tell if I was right (again).
And also no Boltz support, so their LN is useless as well.
Exactly.
It's funny that Boltz was constantly attacked, to be point they had to quit and shut down their service.
17. Post 67134194 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 19:21:31 CEST 2026) in Rede Liquid do Bitcoin hackeada em 4000 BITCOINS:
E ai que ta, agora como isso vai evoluir? Eu acho que era bem melhor eles negociarem mais fundo porque querendo ou nao o 85% voltou
Eu acho que o hacker sabe coisas amais dentro da empresa porque é como se ele tivesse escolhido uma porcentagem muito especifica para ter uma boa margem de negociação
Apos um roubo desse, devolver o 60-70% ja seria muita coisa, entao eu acredito que ele esperasse meio que um "sim" por parte da Blockstream
Acho que o hacker nao quer ser chamado de ladrao. Ele quer ficar com a grana legalmente.
Na verdade deve ser um grupo.
Complicado a Blockstream nao chegar num acordo com eles.
O que eu vejo é assim: a empresa determina o bug bounty e o cidadão precisa aceitar, mesmo sendo um valor que ele não gostou (no caso da Blockstream, não é algo público, e não se sabe o que conversão).. mas o que ele está fazendo agora é extorsão, embora eu concorde que 15% saiu barato para a Blockstream..
O problema é que o raio pode cair duas vezes no mesmo lugar.. o próximo hacker não vai devolver 3.400 bitcoins como esse ai fez justamente por conta dessa postura da empresa.. melhor queimar tudo ou viver uma vida de Vorcaro até ser preso.. isso vale para ataques a outras empresas do setor, essa negociação afeta todo mundo..
Sobre a falta de lastro do LBTC, como você disse, eles devem ter dinheiro para cobrir.. só estão enrolando.
18. Post 67134179 (unedited backup) (by hd49728) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 19:15:55 CEST 2026) in Fear Bitcoin, Buy Gold from me:
Schiff is very intelligent and has made brilliant analysis over the last few years.
He is recommending people to buy gold since it was in 1700 range (4400 now)
I think he is wrong on his bitcoin analysis. But we dont have to agree on him about everything
He is smart and has a successful business with products are correlated with gold, and he has gotten a lot of profit from it. All of his sayings against Bitcoin, to attack Bitcoin, to make it lower in value and future vision are only for main purpose of shilling gold.
Peter Schiff is smart, and clearly know what he has been doing, and he will not stop his favorite investment asset: gold, as well as will never stop saying that gold is better than bitcoin. He has freedom to do that while we have our freedom to research and double check about fact, what he said, what the fact is, and we will easily realize that Bitcoin is better than gold in most years.
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/bitcoin-returns-vs-major-asset-classes/https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/ft01-bitcoin-returns/
19. Post 67133755 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 17:07:55 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-08-29_Sat_10.21h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1787882714 1 5400620.msg67072916 2813627 961598
1787881760 1 4564216.msg67088197 317618 2003859
1787881330 2 5536692.msg67083298 317618 2739424
1787880980 1 178336.msg67088173 198573 1112467
1787876459 1 5592511.msg67087218 949248 3636099
1787876192 1 178336.msg67087878 1027694 67210
1787876158 1 5584952.msg66802369 1112467 3610370
1787875803 1 5456516.msg67086567 2434463 3693501
1787875660 1 178336.msg67087252 1027694 3763872
1787875624 1 178336.msg67087212 1027694 379487
1787875544 1 178336.msg67086621 1027694 67210
1787874833 1 5579836.msg67082582 407174 3753246
1787874370 1 5591143.msg67041984 1174868 97582
1787874337 1 5592131.msg67086471 140584 18321
1787874323 1 5591143.msg67043601 1174868 550315
1787874319 1 5592131.msg67087648 140584 379487
1787873748 1 5592131.msg67088023 3490938 317618
1787873734 2 5591236.msg67046728 3613415 3566824
1787872581 1 2853903.msg66831119 407174 912328
1787872280 1 5479271.msg67082686 3528115 969088
1787872233 1 5479271.msg67083242 3528115 1265260
1787871904 1 5592131.msg67083961 317618 164822
1787871228 2 5592254.msg67078592 3625271 3740101
1787870313 1 5586345.msg67062203 29708 3765896
1787869973 2 3664755.msg67086995 961598 839568
1787868905 1 5592457.msg67085529 149135 2546135
1787867895 2 5589479.msg66981027 3732458 3546931
1787867783 1 5582836.msg67084317 2747752 839568
1787867177 1 5592220.msg67076821 982288 3733034
1787867160 1 178336.msg67087561 1634314 33156
1787867019 1 5592506.msg67087199 3543045 3558380
1787867012 1 5592506.msg67087156 3543045 3513442
1787866994 1 5592506.msg67087449 3543045 1410401
1787866986 2 5592506.msg67087442 3543045 1283017
1787866560 1 5591879.msg67064086 831523 1827294
1787866412 1 5592342.msg67086273 1265260 123824
1787866382 1 5592342.msg67086209 1265260 3762146
1787866181 3 5592515.msg67087484 1852120 65636
1787866039 1 5568599.msg66232233 3479125 3566824
1787866007 3 5545902.msg67086925 1852120 3442679
1787865478 4 5568262.msg67026233 379487 366632
1787865472 2 5591566.msg67064228 3472516 3471475
1787865264 1 5592420.msg67084251 2739454 2004043
1787865202 1 5592515.msg67087484 3547969 65636
1787865113 1 178336.msg67087561 120694 33156
1787865074 1 178336.msg67087561 198573 33156
1787864416 1 178336.msg67086621 33156 67210
1787864414 1 5592448.msg67085512 33156 112493
1787864407 1 5590036.msg67087426 33156 379487
1787864240 1 2235093.msg67085010 1687287 1166480
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (58 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 0 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri Aug 28 04:05:14 2026,
Luzin (
history) sent 1 Merit to
ryzaadit (
history) for
Re: [INFO] Tempat Belajar Gratis! Materi Blockchain & Cryptocurrency untuk Pemula.
On Fri Aug 28 03:49:20 2026,
nutildah (
history) sent 1 Merit to
DireWolfM14 (
history) for
Re: Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny.
On Fri Aug 28 03:42:10 2026,
nutildah (
history) sent 2 Merit to
NotATether (
history) for
Re: Talksearch.io - Advanced Bitcointalk Search Engine.
On Fri Aug 28 03:36:20 2026,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
goldkingcoiner (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri Aug 28 02:20:59 2026,
Kryptowerk (
history) sent 1 Merit to
21MilBTC (
history) for
[FREE RAFFLE#4] Guess The Last 2 Digits on the 1/2 Goldback. Something Fun 4 All.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed Jan 24 23:28:54 2018,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed Jan 24 23:27:54 2018,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed Jan 24 23:27:22 2018,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed Jan 24 23:27:13 2018,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed Jan 24 23:12:21 2018,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (601 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8880 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 935 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3765974:
koilbuckethatbtc (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3766152:
VfpgK (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3766252:
anaxi (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3766277:
danfeh (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3766587:
Maniac!? (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list* (11 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3763168: jaxx.bet
3763191: greysonz
3763248: xxxmourn
3763270: swapsslol
3763276: MegRewards
3763338: omenswap
3763404: Rmun1217
3763459: ohio_jaunt
3763560: paygate-love
3763611: Hazebet.co
3763618: rice_cooker
3763696: Gerdino
3763797: SCORAS
3763826: puzzle_72_worker
3763872: Danish Ali
3763895: Papa_Mojet
3764024: ColdcardVictim
3764049: OLDBOY 003
3764119: IntervalWalker
3764131: luocongjay
3764157: MrGambler531
3764227: Zeto Cash
3764541: Blockspins_Casino
3764562: Simeon1988
3764700: rajashek41
3764752: truedevil
3764889: Pakistani Shaheen
3764905: Sterlino
3765001: nipperk
3765014: AnonymtNorskNr
3765018: slowLearner2
3765075: Monetarium
3765093: snapEX.pro
3765116: nico01
3765228: betski
3765300: SatRush.IO
3765335: 5btcnear
3765697: vegasocials
3765743: truffun
3765795: openbitcoin
3765801: coinfuty
3765834: Chief777
3765870: Julian7586
3765896: iloveDigit
3765903: Criptoview
3765974: koilbuckethatbtc
3766152: VfpgK
3766252: anaxi
3766277: danfeh
3766587: Maniac!?
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8880
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:2
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14562:15040
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2792
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1494
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3763168:0:1
3763191:2:7
3763248:0:1
3763270:0:1
3763276:0:5
3763338:0:1
3763404:0:3
3763459:0:2
3763560:0:1
3763611:0:1
3763618:0:1
3763696:0:1
3763797:12:32
3763826:0:15
3763872:8:50
3763895:0:1
3764024:40:119
3764049:0:22
3764119:0:1
3764131:0:1
3764157:0:4
3764227:0:81
3764541:0:1
3764562:0:1
3764700:0:2
3764752:0:1
3764889:0:1
3764905:0:1
3765001:0:20
3765014:0:1
3765018:1:4
3765075:0:7
3765093:0:2
3765116:0:1
3765228:0:10
3765300:0:5
3765335:0:10
3765697:0:1
3765743:0:1
3765795:0:9
3765801:0:1
3765834:0:12
3765870:3:6
3765896:4:9
3765903:0:1
3765974:0:1
3766152:0:1
3766252:0:2
3766277:0:1
3766587:0:1
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51737Sample 1. 21545 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1125 unique users in 12501 transactions
2. 21352 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 773 unique users in 11658 transactions
3. 18926 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9997 transactions
4. 15668 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8985 transactions
5. 15040 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1230 unique users in 5462 transactions
6. 13887 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 742 unique users in 9137 transactions
7. 13353 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 620 unique users in 5006 transactions
8. 12197 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 541 unique users in 6235 transactions
9. 12159 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 505 unique users in 6678 transactions
10. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
11. 11516 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 619 unique users in 6711 transactions
12. 11429 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 591 unique users in 6574 transactions
13. 11378 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6474 transactions
14. 10719 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 680 unique users in 5772 transactions
15. 10593 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5406 transactions
16. 10471 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 347 unique users in 3818 transactions
17. 10448 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 568 unique users in 4640 transactions
18. 10190 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 546 unique users in 4703 transactions
19. 10149 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 406 unique users in 3537 transactions
20. 10092 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 465 unique users in 5499 transactions
21. 10071 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 477 unique users in 5051 transactions
22. 9337 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 545 unique users in 5052 transactions
23. 9026 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 414 unique users in 4667 transactions
24. 8991 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 587 unique users in 5342 transactions
25. 8880 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 413 unique users in 939 transactions
26. 8839 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 459 unique users in 5241 transactions
27. 8543 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4860 transactions
28. 8260 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 465 unique users in 4532 transactions
29. 7688 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 596 unique users in 4577 transactions
30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
31. 7448 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4270 transactions
32. 7316 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1874 transactions
33. 7199 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3672 transactions
34. 7136 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 230 unique users in 4069 transactions
35. 6998 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 410 unique users in 3859 transactions
36. 6977 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3557 transactions
37. 6918 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 355 unique users in 3263 transactions
38. 6817 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 279 unique users in 3054 transactions
39. 6807 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 495 unique users in 3786 transactions
40. 6788 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 959 unique users in 4422 transactions
41. 6740 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 535 unique users in 3894 transactions
42. 6671 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 208 unique users in 3862 transactions
43. 6603 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 435 unique users in 3617 transactions
44. 6506 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 438 unique users in 3806 transactions
45. 6372 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 627 unique users in 3589 transactions
46. 6277 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 223 unique users in 3653 transactions
47. 6272 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3495 transactions
48. 6087 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2649 transactions
49. 5829 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 464 unique users in 4096 transactions
50. 5820 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 399 unique users in 2763 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51688. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51689. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51690. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51691. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51692. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51693. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51694. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51695. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51696. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51697. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51698. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51699. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51700. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51701. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51702. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51703. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51704. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51705. 1 Merit received by 1 currency now (#23) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51706. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51707. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51708. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51709. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51710. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51711. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51712. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51713. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51714. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51715. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51716. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51717. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51718. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51719. 1 Merit received by -manki- (#2012741) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51720. 1 Merit received by -kazz- (#2680522) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51721. 1 Merit received by -jf (#3668766) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51722. 1 Merit received by -droid- (#196457) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51723. 1 Merit received by -Redacted- (#129075) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51724. 1 Merit received by -Night- (#878210) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51725. 1 Merit received by -Multivitamina- (#2566641) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51726. 1 Merit received by -Khairani- (#3523933) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51727. 1 Merit received by -HK- (#1133384) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51728. 1 Merit received by -BDan- (#1751855) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51729. 1 Merit received by -ATHEIST- (#2381655) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51730. 1 Merit received by +Tatogo+ (#126552) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51731. 1 Merit received by *zismo* (#1114896) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51732. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51733. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51734. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51735. 1 Merit received by #BitLucky (#2101836) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51736. 1 Merit received by !vanovi4 (#2145681) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51737. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26752Sample 1. 78055 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 915 unique users in 13173 transactions
2. 72855 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2327 unique users in 32119 transactions
3. 69707 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3357 unique users in 18221 transactions
4. 62856 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3675 unique users in 60612 transactions
5. 60786 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4759 unique users in 34830 transactions
6. 55125 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3817 unique users in 38138 transactions
7. 45941 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2945 unique users in 16272 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 39633 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2547 unique users in 14623 transactions
10. 38380 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2966 unique users in 31075 transactions
11. 36270 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1602 unique users in 14309 transactions
12. 34113 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2222 unique users in 11601 transactions
13. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
14. 32930 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1496 unique users in 10476 transactions
15. 30107 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1468 unique users in 7902 transactions
16. 29564 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1743 unique users in 6907 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 605 unique users in 6509 transactions
20. 23731 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1396 unique users in 9636 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18788 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1813 unique users in 4192 transactions
23. 17163 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 572 unique users in 8091 transactions
24. 17015 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 758 unique users in 6348 transactions
25. 16930 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1769 unique users in 7719 transactions
26. 16801 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1210 unique users in 9499 transactions
27. 16282 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2014 unique users in 6620 transactions
28. 15387 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 647 unique users in 5514 transactions
29. 15350 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1338 unique users in 8609 transactions
30. 14790 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1698 unique users in 7725 transactions
31. 14562 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1113 unique users in 1791 transactions
32. 14454 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3169 unique users in 7587 transactions
33. 13696 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 667 unique users in 3652 transactions
34. 13669 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1369 unique users in 7552 transactions
35. 13600 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1159 unique users in 8315 transactions
36. 13561 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5936 transactions
37. 13456 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6314 transactions
38. 13456 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 856 unique users in 4331 transactions
39. 12209 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1213 unique users in 6654 transactions
40. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8958 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 593 unique users in 7590 transactions
43. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
44. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
45. 8690 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 526 unique users in 6833 transactions
46. 8686 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 764 unique users in 7479 transactions
47. 8649 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1066 unique users in 3744 transactions
48. 8493 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 333 unique users in 3408 transactions
49. 8374 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 682 unique users in 2573 transactions
50. 8290 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 965 unique users in 3617 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26703. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26705. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26706. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26707. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26708. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26709. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26710. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26711. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26712. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26713. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26714. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26715. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26716. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26717. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26718. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26719. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26720. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26721. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26722. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26723. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26724. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26725. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26726. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26727. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26728. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26729. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26730. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26731. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26732. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26733. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26734. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26735. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26736. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26737. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26738. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26739. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26740. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26741. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26742. 1 Merit sent by .nuke (#89670) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26743. 1 Merit sent by .crypto (#917656) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26744. 1 Merit sent by .anto. (#548049) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26745. 1 Merit sent by -kirito (#1747828) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26746. 1 Merit sent by -Night- (#878210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26747. 1 Merit sent by -Kaizer- (#60550) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26748. 1 Merit sent by -Blockcuan- (#2545116) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26749. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26750. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26751. 1 Merit sent by #Greatest (#3601697) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26752. 1 Merit sent by #Bentley (#1232592) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 344950 (14.42%)
Tuesday 343656 (14.36%)
Wednesday 343031 (14.34%)
Thursday 363811 (15.21%)
Friday 361965 (15.13%)
Saturday 315105 (13.17%)
Sunday 319350 (13.35%)
Total: 2391868
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
20. Post 67133566 (unedited backup) (by Karl_3000) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 16:15:13 CEST 2026) in The list of child boards in this sub-forum needs to be updated!:
Why did you not post this on Meta instead? That is the right board this supposed to be.
quote author=bitmover link=topic=5593804.msg67132953#msg67132953 date=1789122013]
I think sparrow is the only wallet I can think of that would deserve a place in this sub.
But it is so new, it was released just 2 years ago. I would wait the test of time before adding it. (lots of wallet fails over time)
[/quote]
You can correct me, but I have known about Sparrow wallet since 2020. I browsed about when Sparrow was released and I also saw August 29, 2020 while the project’s initial commit was March 22, 2020.
21. Post 67133381 (unedited backup) (by DrBeer) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 15:14:07 CEST 2026) in Українська (Ukrainian):
Автор:
notocactusОригінальна тема:
[Мега ресурси для newbie] Перевірте тут, знайдіть більшість того, що вам потрібно, перш ніж питати.
Примітки- Newbie часто ставлять однакові повторювані питання, і ця тема створена тут, у розділі Beginners & Help, щоб допомогти їм знайти найосновніші питання та відповіді, не запитуючи.
- Сподіваюся, ця тема допоможе зменшити кількість таких питань, принаймні хоч якось.
- Я знаю, що деякі newbie не звертатимуть уваги на цю тему, але нехай так.
- Тема ще в процесі складання, ще не завершена.
- Вона тимчасово закрита, щоб уникнути спаму. Я відкрию її, коли вона буде завершена.
ЗмістТеми, пов'язані з форумомІнструменти форуму, створені спільнотоюКампанії підписів та аватарів під керівництвом спільнотиКниги про Bitcoin* Посилання для завантаження деяких книг взяті з [RESOURCES] Free bitcoin/blockchain/finance eBook. Посилання можуть у будь-який момент перестати працювати, залежно від Maus0728.Навчальні ресурсиГаманці
Переклад здійснено завдяки ініціативі AoBT:
22. Post 67132323 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 04:46:01 CEST 2026) in [Userscript] Automatically Converts copy/pasted URLs to [url=...]Text[/url]:
That's great to hear
I have a feature request (not sure whether its already requested, as I have not read other comments, as I'm on my mobile.device). Can you make it so that when something is selected (like a word, or a sentence, or anything), I can directly paste the link, and it gets embedded with that selected portion. So that I don't need to manually edit the "change_text" part!
I'm not sure if you understand my idea (should have used better wordings I guess).
I have just added this, that's actually a very nice feature.
Here's the sample of how it works
Maybe scrap the website title from where you copied the contenttto fill the "change_text"
I have thought of this as well, i even tried it, but there are lots of issues, one is CORS problem, some sites don't work well. Also, it takes time, like several seconds, which is not appropriate how fast copy and paste is and knowing how patience work for some of most, so i abandoned the idea lol
23. Post 67132295 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 04:15:01 CEST 2026) in [Userscript] Automatically Converts copy/pasted URLs to [url=...]Text[/url]:
....snip....
There are some websites which you copy a content and when you pasted you the "content ... read more in URL"
Maybe something like this would fit well
Maybe scrap the website title from where you copied the contenttto fill the "change_text"
Yeah, the free image hosting sites that tends to link their site with the img tag. But this is not what I originally had in mind, though this too (feature) is somewhat needed if OP wants to further improve his tool.
What I want is, select and paste and the selected part gets embedded with the link.
like this below...
24. Post 67132171 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 01:56:32 CEST 2026) in [Userscript] Automatically Converts copy/pasted URLs to [url=...]Text[/url]:
I actually may consider adding a new button especially for mobile phone users as i didnt try it there yet, only on desktop. If someone can do, i appreciate it. I might try it later today though.
You can check the code of my extension
I added several buttons
Code:
https://github.com/bitmover-studio/bitcoindata-extensionCool, thanks. I'll check on this.
Usually, i struggle on how to make/generate an icon or the design of it when it comes to this. Well, anyway, i will just look for some reference.
25. Post 67132140 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Fri Sep 11 01:43:25 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
I am impressed by the monthly visits. Could this be related to bot traffic? I saw just a few months ago you had like 6-10k visitors.
Yes, I believe it may be related to that.
I've noticed this difference since March. I think I have more bots visiting, and I've already blocked some.
But I'm trying to take some time to better understand what's causing this increase, and whether it makes sense for it to exist or not.
26. Post 67131529 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Thu Sep 10 22:09:55 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
The slightly higher rate of privacy focused services pays off when you want privacy
From personal experience I agree 100 percent. You can keep trying to avoid paying the highest rates and then if you add up all the ways you took around it, you realize it was actually more expensive both in money and in time than if you simply used the one, simple but more expensive way instead.
27. Post 67131430 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Thu Sep 10 21:43:25 CEST 2026) in [Userscript] Automatically Converts copy/pasted URLs to [url=...]Text[/url]:
This is indeed a problem, to paste links in the forum
I really have a bad experience of pasting links to adding url tag and adding text on it that's why i came up such an idea and have a time thinking to code lmao.
I was going to suggest using CTRL+SHIFT+V or CTRL+ALT+V for the url with the bbcode. Or even a new paste button in the forum page.
But you already solved slightly different
I actually may consider adding a new button especially for mobile phone users as i didnt try it there yet, only on desktop. If someone can do, i appreciate it. I might try it later today though.
28. Post 67130905 (unedited backup) (by Volgastallion) (scraped on Thu Sep 10 18:45:07 CEST 2026) in BEAT TRUMP CLOCK DISCUSSION THREAD:
Today is the last day of our contest to submit or edit your predictions
🚀💰 BTC CONTEST "SIGNATURE BAN" [BTC PRIZE] 🚀💰[/b]
Remember that if we dont reach at elast 20 participants we are not gonna play it. (im gonna make a new one if that happen to see if changing something more people is set to play).
Tagging people who already played some of my previous contest, i dont know who already submit or not.
Clock is ticking.
LoyceV
paid2
psycodad
philipma1957
Danydee
BABY SHOES
GazetaBitcoin
Dumper
strunberg
Koal-84
BlackhatCoiner
1miau
nutildah
Betwrong
Smartprofit
fillippone
1dq
Haunebu
krogothmanhattan
AlcoHodl
xlays
pooya87
dkbit98
Odohu
ajiz
slapper
ovcijisir
vapourminer
goldkingcoiner
despairo
NotATether
OmegaStarScream
OgNasty
The Speptical Chymist
Mia Chloe
DiMarxist
cryptofrka
joker_josue
NeuroticFish
Pmalek
Biodom
bitbollo
Woodie
Becassine
BTCLiz
Rikafip
bitmover
xandry
buwaytress
29. Post 67129420 (unedited backup) (by Trêvoid) (scraped on Thu Sep 10 08:54:08 CEST 2026) in Secure & Private No-KYC Crypto Swaps (MWEB, XMR):
Friendly bump!
If you are worried about your privacy, do not trust any remote node. Run your own and use Tor to route your traffic regardless of which node you choose.
I have recently discovered that there are other browsers which allows you to navigate to onion links, such as Brave Browser in private mode. But brave browser
do not offer anonymity like Tor Browser.
To get the most privacy when accessing onion links, you should use Tor Browser.
Thanks, Bitmover. It’s good to see you.
Brave’s integration of Tor is generally intended for low-stakes privacy , such as bypassing simple censorship or ISP-level blocking.
30. Post 67128729 (unedited backup) (by non fungible anxiety) (scraped on Thu Sep 10 00:10:19 CEST 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
Ou dar a mesma pena pro ladrão de galinhas e pro hitler
oportunidade os dois ex presidentes tiveram igual. Só comparar o nível dos escândalos e ver qual país vc prefere viver.
Por mim o bolsonaro pode ir pra cadeia por ter feito rachadinha, nao tenho nenhum problema com isso. Mas ouvir isso de um petista que acha que roubar 55 bilhões é tão ruim quanto roubar 6 milhões, mas ele acha o lula vai cool e vai botar no corrupto que ele gosta mais, não dá.
O mais importante para mim é que o próximo presidente vai poder escolher 4 ministros para o STF, e o histórico de Lula é assustador:
- Advogado pessoal (Zanin)
- Ex-ministro da Justiça do seu governo e petista (Flávio Dino)
- Ex-Advogado-Geral da União do seu governo e garoto de recados (Jorge Messias)
Mesmo que Flávio Bolsonaro não seja flor que se cheire, é melhor um embate maior de ideias do que uma hegemonia exclusivamente Lula.
Se o flavio for eleito pode ter certeza que um dos ministros vai ser o Bessias.
31. Post 67128292 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 21:47:55 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
I tend to agree with bitmover here. Maybe DEX.fo is not too dangerous as a competitor to OKX, but besides DEX, there are other exchanges. I'm sure there are more on the list that are false-positive blacklisted. From their perspective, why not make it harder for competitors to access, at least for their own users? I assume that mostly only OKX users have their browser add-on installed.
There are a lot of people who treat CEX as a wallet. I'm sure many of them don't even know how instant exchangers work and that everything is possible without a KYC procedure. It's better for OKX if many remain in the dark.
Sleeping easily is the best decision. Even some people have a different mindset, so they can afford to sleep after wrecking their accounts, but the majority can't. So always know where you stand. If you can't sleep well after a few losing trades, then bro, that's not for you. Better we control our emotions, which is easy, not that hard.
Because everything is a skill set. Just like AI learns and creates skill sets, we can also learn and create our own skill sets. We can learn how to control emotions by fighting with them on a daily basis and by knowing what our tools are in this fight.
32. Post 67127869 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 19:13:01 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
It doesn't really matter which specific competitor was chosen. Many swapping services offer better rates for clients than b1exch.
Better rates are good until your funds are taken hostage waiting for endless kyc.
There are dozens, maybe hundreds of scam accusations around the web against big and known services like fixed float or Changelly, which offer good rates but make shotgun kyc all the time.
The slightly higher rate of privacy focused services pays off when you want privacy
Exchange rate is certainly an important condition when choosing instant exchange, but it does not always have to be decisive.
For example, what I noticed is that several very competitive instant exchangers often have an additional "lag" when exchanging with XMR in the relationship.
There are certainly those who want the swap process to be instant and not to last several hours.
33. Post 67127464 (unedited backup) (by pandakitty) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 16:42:50 CEST 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
Ou dar a mesma pena pro ladrão de galinhas e pro hitler
oportunidade os dois ex presidentes tiveram igual. Só comparar o nível dos escândalos e ver qual país vc prefere viver.
Por mim o bolsonaro pode ir pra cadeia por ter feito rachadinha, nao tenho nenhum problema com isso. Mas ouvir isso de um petista que acha que roubar 55 bilhões é tão ruim quanto roubar 6 milhões, mas ele acha o lula vai cool e vai botar no corrupto que ele gosta mais, não dá.
O mais importante para mim é que o próximo presidente vai poder escolher 4 ministros para o STF, e o histórico de Lula é assustador:
- Advogado pessoal (Zanin)
- Ex-ministro da Justiça do seu governo e petista (Flávio Dino)
- Ex-Advogado-Geral da União do seu governo e garoto de recados (Jorge Messias)
Mesmo que Flávio Bolsonaro não seja flor que se cheire, é melhor um embate maior de ideias do que uma hegemonia exclusivamente Lula.
34. Post 67127347 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 15:58:19 CEST 2026) in List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance:
But, there might be some way to earn from your tool (if you want to). Maybe free up to 5 downloads per month, and then ask for money after 5 downloads, or some other model.
I enjoy projects much more without dealing with accounting systems
In theory, the Torrent solution would be perfect: if 1000 people per day download it, they'll share the majority of bandwidth consumption amongst themselves and my problem is gone
But so far, I only get a few downloads per day. Let's see if this is a deal breaker before trying more drastic measures
However, you don't have to do use AI this way (asking it do to things you don't understand).
I've never used and always Ignored all chatbots I see
35. Post 67127094 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 14:36:50 CEST 2026) in List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance:
It will demand some work from your side. AI certainly helps.
I don't really like using things I don't understand.
Easy way:
Put your email and give them the link to download once they send you the btc.
Then I'll have to keep track of who shares their link with whom, and it's terrible for privacy.
Longer way:
You would probably have to create an account/login system.
Genetate a single address for each account( maybe use btcpayserver or a bitcoin library)
It should still work for automated downloads, as that's how most people use this.
But there's a bigger "problem": I never created this with the intention of earning money from it. I kinda like how this data has become so established that even people on Github link to addresses.loyce.club. Charging money for it would scare off the large majority of users, even if it's just a small amount.
So for now, I'll just try the Torrent solution for a while.
36. Post 67126881 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 13:06:19 CEST 2026) in List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance:
But he charges $199 USD to have access to the information (all addresses with balance).
If someone pays that much for something they can create or download for free, that's on them
Maybe charging something wouldn't be a bad idea.
I'd do that, if I'd know how. It was mentioned on the previous page:
A thousand downloads per day wouldn't be any problem at all if they all pay $1 per year.
37. Post 67126849 (unedited backup) (by DaveF) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 12:52:19 CEST 2026) in Wallets connected/created through lootbot are being wiped out:
I never heard of lootbot, but after checking the domain, it is a .xyz domain, which, for me, I can't trust any project that uses .xyz domains.
I hope some users are still able to move their funds to a new wallet.
I got curious about this. Any reason for that? Have you seen many scams in .xyz?
.xyz were initially designed to be an alternative to .net and .com domains, for technology and inovation projects.
I saw many good solid projects using it.
Even google bought them for Alphabet
https://abc.xyz/Also found this:
https://hackernoon.com/is-xyz-the-new-com-6f3c3e5829dfxyz domains are commonly blocked by many security appliances and email filters by default. That's how bad it is.
Alphabet has 100s of 1000s of domains with all extensions for many reasons, they buying a $1.99 domain means nothing.
Anyway, I think this should be in the altcoin section since it does not matter to people who are holding
BTC.
With the above being said, has anyone done any sort of looking at the code to really see what it was doing?
-Dave
38. Post 67126626 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 11:21:19 CEST 2026) in Wallets connected/created through lootbot are being wiped out:
I only see people who can trust anything to store their valuable assets
.
I never heard of lootbot, but after checking the domain, it is a .xyz domain, which, for me, I can't trust any project that uses .xyz domains.
I hope some users are still able to move their funds to a new wallet.
I got curious about this. Any reason for that? Have you seen many scams in .xyz?
TLD doesn’t really matter, anyone can turnout to be a scam anytime.. even if they start as legit.
Talking about the “xyz”, I found it to be more suspicious to me too ,even though TlD doesn’t matter.. maybe it because of the “.xyz” per se
https://urlhaus.abuse.ch/browse.php?search=.xyzI don’t really look into them, but now i understand why they are pricey..
39. Post 67126531 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 10:39:25 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
OKX is a competitor of Dex.fo.
This is very unethical from OKX side.
I remember a long time ago when eXch (a former kyc-free exchange) had problems with Bybit, which was blocking coins from eXch.
I believe some of those high regulated CEX will always try to hurt kyc-free CEX, like Dex.fo
Do you think they do it because DEX.fo is a competitor of OKX? Hmm, that's a strange angle, because I don't think they should worry about DEX.fo. They have been in the business for years and still feel insecure by a platform that has just come into the market? Do they even know about DEX.fo?
I tend to agree with bitmover here. Maybe DEX.fo is not too dangerous as a competitor to OKX, but besides DEX, there are other exchanges. I'm sure there are more on the list that are false-positive blacklisted. From their perspective, why not make it harder for competitors to access, at least for their own users? I assume that mostly only OKX users have their browser add-on installed.
There are a lot of people who treat CEX as a wallet. I'm sure many of them don't even know how instant exchangers work and that everything is possible without a KYC procedure. It's better for OKX if many remain in the dark.
40. Post 67126499 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 10:26:31 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Good job! I already filled in the form and submitted
I have also filled out the form and reported my feedback that dex.fo is not a risky website.
Someone reported a similar situation in the past and I suspected that it was because of the word "DEX". We advised him to report which he did.
Genuinely appreciate all four of you taking the time on this — not something anyone had to do, and it makes a real difference on something we can't fix unilaterally from our side.
41. Post 67126498 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 10:25:31 CEST 2026) in [ANN] Verify Bitcoin Signed Message - Easily shareable in Stake Address Thread.:
Considering overall domain traffic, most of my traffic is direct link, and the second is google. Bitcointalk is 5th place.
"Direct" is traffic when someone types your domain directly into a browser. I assume a small part of that is traffic you generated while developing this tool.
Also, "direct" traffic can occur if Cloudflare eats the "referrer" and displays fake direct. Often links from forums or Telegram lose the referrer header, so they show up as direct.
In general, it's not a big deal. You are interested in the traffic of real people anyway. This is just a short explanation for a better understanding of the structure of visits in your statistics.
I have to admit that I am also surprised by the traffic from DuckDuckGo. Obviously, the owner of the site is a good source of traffic.
42. Post 67126328 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 09:08:01 CEST 2026) in Aqua wallet - Bitcoin, Lightning, Liquid:
It's certainly been a very bad period for Aqua and the JAN3 team. The Liquid Federation is missing around 600 LBTC unless something changed last night. That's quite an amount. Blockstream is beta testing Blockstream Swaps. Perhaps in the future, JAN3 and Aqua Wallet will look to partner with them and continue where Boltz left off. There has been no news coming from Boltz ever since the ownership change and the website is offline.
43. Post 67126319 (unedited backup) (by Cinexa) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 09:03:43 CEST 2026) in [ANN] Verify Bitcoin Signed Message - Easily shareable in Stake Address Thread.:
Congratulations bitmover.
I searched on DuckDuckGo with the keyword bitcoin message verifier, and the first result showed your website.
You have done a good job. However, I didn’t see the PGP message verifier tool on DuckDuckGo. I am not sure if I searched with weird keywords.
44. Post 67126292 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 08:50:19 CEST 2026) in Porque o postar em outra sub aba além daqui, o fórum apaga meu post?:
Eu só nao entendo pq ele ta usando essas contas compradas/hackeadas que são newbie ainda.
Não vale nem a pena dar um red trust, pq elas não valem nada. Mas claramente sao contas compradas/hackeadas.
O que ue não entendo é a dedicação dele em continuar gastando tempo com isso aqui... não para de brotar tópicos.
Será que ele pagou caro demais para não querer desistir tão rápido?
Pelo o que eu estou lendo, não é caso unico no forum. Parece que ultimamente tem surgindo essas contas.
Ou seja, a malta das alt farms, poderá estar a mudar a estratégia. Pegar em varias contas antigas, e espalhar-se pelo forum a tentar passar-se por alguém de varias comunidades locais. Tentar disfarçar a coisa... tentar!
45. Post 67126022 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 04:41:56 CEST 2026) in Wallets connected/created through lootbot are being wiped out:
I never heard of lootbot, but after checking the domain, it is a .xyz domain, which, for me, I can't trust any project that uses .xyz domains.
I hope some users are still able to move their funds to a new wallet.
I got curious about this. Any reason for that? Have you seen many scams in .xyz?
.xyz were initially designed to be an alternative to .net and .com domains, for technology and inovation projects.
I saw many good solid projects using it.
Even google bought them for Alphabet
https://abc.xyz/Also found this:
https://hackernoon.com/is-xyz-the-new-com-6f3c3e5829dfI think because the .xyz is so cheap, this is the reason why many scammers choose to use that domain.
That one actually perfect for those people want to create clones, phising and for temporary site.
But yeah I agree that not all sites using .xyz are scam, but due to many scams happening and what people usually notice that the site scam them is using .xzy domain. It left some impression to people that majority of the site using that are just the same scam.
46. Post 67125916 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 02:37:20 CEST 2026) in Porque o postar em outra sub aba além daqui, o fórum apaga meu post?:
Eu só nao entendo pq ele ta usando essas contas compradas/hackeadas que são newbie ainda.
Não vale nem a pena dar um red trust, pq elas não valem nada. Mas claramente sao contas compradas/hackeadas.
O que ue não entendo é a dedicação dele em continuar gastando tempo com isso aqui, será que ele pagou caro demais para não desistir tão rápido?
47. Post 67125803 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 01:29:31 CEST 2026) in Software Wallet - Discussões e Novidades:
Acho que vale a reflexão se isso aumenta sua segurança ou diminui.
Ja temos carteiras como a trezor e ledger que nunca foram hackeadas, uma vez que a seed tenha sido gerada em segurança
Ja imprimir private keys, sei la.... pode ter cache em impressoras, sei la. Nao conheço sobre isso os possíveis pontos de falha em setup complexos.
Concordo em partes,
Antes das HW modernas, como que a velha guarda fazia todo esse esquema seguindo boas recomendações de segurança? Tem gente que faz isso até hoje e as alternativas apresentadas aqui é pra quem não confia muito mais em trezor/ledger/bitbox depois do acontecido com coldcard e data leaks vazados da Trezor e Ledger.
Usar impressora offline, antiga já resolve, e se mesmo assim não atender a paranoia, criptografa a(s) chaves privada(s) com BIP38, se por algum motivo a impressora tiver um backdoor instalado, mesmo sendo offline, ela vai ter uma chave criptografada, a senha só você terá.
Uma chave criptografada com BIP38 começa com 6xxxxxxxx
Não precisa salvar chaves privadas isoladas tbm, basta gerar uma seed phrase offline em um software como sparrow, electrum e etc, pegar a xpub e ela vai gerar endereços públicos pra sempre, você só precisa ter um dispositivo offline que vc garante que é seguro pra assinar as transações.
A xpub vai pra uma hot wallet e pode ser no celular.
48. Post 67125760 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Wed Sep 9 01:01:13 CEST 2026) in [ANN] Verify Bitcoin Signed Message - Easily shareable in Stake Address Thread.:
I'm glad this turned out to be a good idea for your site. What's certainly interesting is that this tool has been recognized much more outside of both forums, where it was primarily presented.
Looks like there is a lack of decent bitcoin message verification tools. I have just improved the SEO for those tools to be better seen by google. Let's see if I get more traffic from them in the next weeks/months.
As far as I can see, you get the least amount of traffic from Google.
Solving that should be high positioned on your to-do list.
49. Post 67125056 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Tue Sep 8 20:50:49 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
DEX.fo_off Thanks for hearing me, I understand your side. Just gave my opinion.
OKX is a competitor of Dex.fo.
This is very unethical from OKX side.
I remember a long time ago when eXch (a former kyc-free exchange) had problems with Bybit, which was blocking coins from eXch.
I believe some of those high regulated CEX will always try to hurt kyc-free CEX, like Dex.fo
Do you think they do it because DEX.fo is a competitor of OKX? Hmm, that's a strange angle, because I don't think they should worry about DEX.fo. They have been in the business for years and still feel insecure by a platform that has just come into the market? Do they even know about DEX.fo?
One should separate the investment in two parts to have better profits in long term and short term. If someone is into Bitcoin investing and does DCA on weekly or monthly basis then it's better to split that investment in two parts one for long term holding and other one to sell take profit in short term.
Hmm this can be beneficial but I am good with my one long term mindset instead of having two. Dopamine is important we can get that any other way but yep profit keeps the spirits up and we tend to make more losses because after that we make stupid decisions and face losses.
The burden will still be on the shoulders of the holders, this can't reduce it.
50. Post 67124185 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Tue Sep 8 16:56:55 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
I believe this is quite useful and everyone should do it.
How did you report? Is it necessary to download the wallet?
Here's the link:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf6dEq2jEsmteHeqnS6S_Pq3kbGr30se1hXg-gZqFKPHLZi1A/viewform
51. Post 67122633 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Tue Sep 8 06:18:25 CEST 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
Sorry for your loss.
In 2 weeks I go to my urologist to address my rising PSA scores.
My family record with prostate cancer is poor.
Granddad got it at 67 died at 76 he was a good patient and took care of himself
Great Uncle got it 73 died at 74 played ostrich never checked it
Great Uncle got it at 81 died at 83 a real health guy food work out etc.
I have done a biopsy 1 time I was clean in 2024. Here is hoping I check out after reaching my all-time high PSA number (3.99 not bad, but with family history I have fears)
My understanding is that historically and perhaps in the past 20-30 years, there has been a lot of over diagnosis and over treatment when it comes to concerns about prostrate cancer.
##Maybe, the end of baby-bull patterns?
There is no such thing as a "baby bull pattern."
#justsayingI am having some difficulties understanding how comparing bitcoin to the S&P 500 over a 1.5 year-ish period has any kind of meaning in terms of long term bitcoin fundamentals as compared with merely trying to guess which way the price might go with an attempt to try to place higher odds for one price direction as compared with another price direction, at least in the short-term.
Fair point on the long term timeline JJG. Short term charts are just dynamic snapshots for fun and observation, not a replacement for 4-10 year stacking. Hodling and accumulating is still the ultimate plan.
I don't have any difficulties understanding... People who sold the Bitcoin top then bought the S&P 500 are up substantially over the people who ignored the 4-year cycle and decided to hold through a >50% drawdown. The denial of this fact by the people who argued against selling the top is the only thing that puzzles me.
Of course you are puzzled, and that is likely part of the reason that you are still fucking around trying to trade rather than buying and holding when you could have had a BIG ASS bitcoin stack size if you had not been fucking around for each of the past 4-ish cycles that you have been in bitcoin.
Yeah, sure maybe this particular cycle you may have had gotten lucky or partially lucky, yet even that is not clear, not that anyone needs to know the details of your stack size and/or the various opportunity cost you fucked up based on your ongoing inabilities to think beyond the short term and/or your seeming inabilities to think in terms of long term investing rather than trading.
Over the years, you end up leaving all kinds of money on the table while you are counting the times that you one on the your supposed trade when you have likely missed out on multiples and magnitudes of compounding portfolio valuations based on your not always being in when you should be and trying to spin your actions as if you were doing something less than dumb.
Especially in a BTC/USD speculation thread. There really should be a BTC stacking thread for the folks who want to stay in up-only mode at the top of the 4-year cycle.
Yes, of course, you cannot even appreciate the value of buy and hold and ongoingly invest into bitcoin until you reached such status of enough bitcoin or more than enough bitcoin. You don't seem to understand the concept, yet you seem to want to ongoingly lecture guys about some kind of supposed value in trying to play cycle swings, as if any mere mortal is capable of determining when the price is going to go up, down or sideways, even though maybe retrospectively it might have had appeared obvious, it tends to not be obvious when we are in the midst of ups, down or sideways periods.
I guess the only problem with that is the people who rage against those who sold the top sell part of their stack annually and never replace it, so not even a stacking thread would be appropriate for whatever it is they think they're doing.
If you have reached overaccumulation status that means that you have enough or more than enough bitcoin. Do you need another example?
Let's say that you had not been such a retard in your first 6-ish years of being in bitcoin and you had mostly concentrated on accumulating bitcoin rather than fucking around trying to trade it.
So perhaps between June 2011 and May 2013, you did not have much of a budget, and so you ended up investing $100 per month, and so you ended up investing $2,400 and you accumulated 120 BTC ($20 per coin).
Then let's say between June 2013 and May 2017, your budget was a bit better and you were able to invest $100 per week, which would have had been $5,200 per year and $20,800 after 4 years. After 4 years, you would have had accumulated 41.6 BTC.
So then if we consider the whole matter of ongoingly and persistently accumulating bitcoin for about 6-ish years between June 2011 and May 2017, you could have had invested right around $23,200 in total and had accumulated right around 161.6 bitcoin.. which surely could have had put you at something near overaccumulation status at some point later down the road, even if you had stopped accumulating more bitcoin
A large number of guys right now would be quite well off with 161.6 BTC, since it would have a 200-WMA value of nearly $10.5 million and a spot price value of more than $12.7 million.
You could even have around a sustainable monthly withdrawal amount that would be close to 1 bitcoin per month.
You seem to not understand and/or value the power of ongoing accumulation of bitcoin to reach a large enough or a greater than needed accumulation amount.
Let's see if i sold1 btc at 36k base for 126k
My profit would be 90k if usa tax payer. I could owe 30k which I pay.
So 126k-30k is 96k
I park it at 4% and 11 months later I have almost 100k
With maybe 1 k tax owed on the 4k interest. I compare to the guy that held the 1 btc
And he has 80k and he has 44k profit to be taxed if he cashs.
So og was correct to sell it at 126k
Yea og
Instead of sucking the dick of a dumbass short term trader, you need to zoom out a wee bit in order to understand the value and the power of accumulating and/or holding bitcoin over more than one whole cycle prior to starting to "cash out."
Maybe try doing some longer term math that might involve a couple of cycles rather than trying to fuck around within parameters of current cycles, and yeah, OgNasty seems to remain uncertain if the low for this cycle is "in," yet, which adds up to a lot of time both being out when he should be in and also a lot of time of failing/refusing to continue to accumulate bitcoin, when he seems to already ongoingly admit that he does not have enough or more than enough bitcoin.
[edited out]
My sale was at $117K. I did not manage to sell any in the 120s I don’t think.
Your scenario also doesn’t count that a single filer investor can get $49,450 in tax free long term capital gains per year. That makes a significant difference. Then there’s the S&P performance since then, or the 6% interest currently available on cash, or if you use that income to buy the bottom…
Hardly even meaningful if you could have had a bitcoin portfolio size of 161.4 BTC or greater and you are talking about selling 1-2 bitcoin for potential capital gain tax exemptions of $49,450-ish?
I might misunderstand your post, yet from my perspective, I consider bitcoin to be the opposite of money printing, so I have some difficulties understanding how bitcoin embraces money printing rather than being a check upon other systems that tolerate a whole hell-of-a-lot of money printing, while bitcoin embraces a fixed supply that is so strict that it does not even have any kind of tail emission.
The block reward drives the security of Bitcoin through money printing. The strict control on emission is part of how it uses it during its adoption phase. You're correct that it eventually goes away but that's not directly relevant to my statement.
We can agree to disagree, especially since even if bitcoin is continuing to be issued and we know the rate of issuance, there is no manipulation of bitcoin's issuance schedule which is a pretty damned strict kind of issuance schedule that is unlike any other asset class (or money) currently in existence.
52. Post 67122472 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Tue Sep 8 02:51:02 CEST 2026) in Rede Liquid do Bitcoin hackeada em 4000 BITCOINS:
Eu estava pensando se algo assim acontece com USDT ou algo assim em uma rede L2.
Acho que é muito mais difícil de acontecer e muito mais fácil de remediar..
Em comparação com esse ataque da Liquid, seria como se alguém fosse a um banco e conseguisse trocar US$ 320 milhões de USDT por USD.. e o banco trocasse na hora porque não viu nada de errado nas moedas
O problema do LN, não foi por causa daquele BIP110?
Não me recordo de ter visto algo sobre ataque à rede...
Foi no BTCPay Server.. não diretamente na LN, mas muita gente usava.
No final ficou 15%
Alguém tem informação se rolou algum acordo ou garantia que não irão atrás do hacker?
Pensei que o padrão seria 10% o que já era uma quantia imensa
Qualquer coisa que fosse já é papo de aposentadoria
15%, quase 600 BTC, o cara praticamente já se aposentou, ele e mais a geração dele. Uma quantia gorda até.
Também achei que seria algo entre 5 a 10%.. mas acho que os dois lados saíram bem satisfeitos..
Pelo visto rolou uma negociação.. ai fica a linha tênue entre bug bounty e extorsão
