Last update: 2026-08-21_Fri_00.42h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
bitmover receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. bitmover
2. FeeBuddy
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "bitmover" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67065533 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 00:41:07 CEST 2026) in Question to all campaign manager, what you do in this case?:
But, sometimes if the money is actually good and you see a future in that relationship with the customer, exposing your identity might make sense. Depending on your financial situation as well.
personally speaking, it would be under one condition, only if the other party would expose their identity as well... maybe i won't go as far as to ask them to show me their ID, but full name and a video chat would be a must.
if we are gonna do the "who you are" thing, and make it an official employment relationship, it's got to be a two way street.
2. Post 67065052 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 22:17:07 CEST 2026) in Will De-Dollarization Strengthen Bitcoin's Position as a Neutral Global Asset.:
that de-dollarization doesn't necessarily mean that countries will adopt Bitcoin. That's not to say that the BRICS countries that have opted to reduce dollar dependency and begin using local currencies are taking the plunge into BTC, though. That said, Bitcoin may indirectly benefit, as it is neither tied to any one government and is a neutral asset. It has the major drawbacks of volatility, lack of clarity in regulations, scalability and not being widely used for regular payments. I don't think bitcoin is suitable for replacing national currencies or as a day to day payment system, I believe it's more realistic as a neutral asset and a settlement option for larger transfers.
Fortify has explained it all very well already, and you definitely added good points, CapsLock.
Volatility is a drawback, but really not a major one, because let's say scalability is the issue here, but what I am going to say is going to contradict the utility of it for the countries who want to avoid dollars and use a currency or medium that nobody controls. I recently came to learn that Hal has said:
Hal Finney also answered that in 2010.
Actually there is a very good reason for Bitcoin-backed banks to exist, issuing their own digital cash currency, redeemable for bitcoins. Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain. There needs to be a secondary level of payment systems which is lighter weight and more efficient. Likewise, the time needed for Bitcoin transactions to finalize will be impractical for medium to large value purchases.
Bitcoin backed banks will solve these problems. They can work like banks did before nationalization of currency. Different banks can have different policies, some more aggressive, some more conservative. Some would be fractional reserve while others may be 100% Bitcoin backed. Interest rates may vary. Cash from some banks may trade at a discount to that from others.
George Selgin has worked out the theory of competitive free banking in detail, and he argues that such a system would be stable, inflation resistant and self-regulating.
I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash. Most Bitcoin transactions will occur between banks, to settle net transfers. Bitcoin transactions by private individuals will be as rare as... well, as Bitcoin based purchases are today.
If people move to 2nd layer solutions if the fee is too expensive, only big transfer between banks/ecchanges and other big players will happen on-chain.
So if Hal really means it, which is a possible and a good assumption at that time, then a central body will be using BTC as backup to create their own currency that won't move on the BTC blockchain. But this way, at least we won't have to suffer from the scalability issues. It can also be widely used for payments as well, but again, it contradicts the feature of freedom.
3. Post 67064991 (unedited backup) (by Cricktor) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 22:01:31 CEST 2026) in 2.62x BTC dumped to legacy address of Genesis block:
It didn't take long for another worthy transaction to be recorded. There was also quite some traffic thrown at the Genesis block, mostly dust, roundabout 180ish transaction from the last entry to the table. Some entity was in a generous mood and what a ridiculous feerate was paid for the transaction package, too.
Past March 14
th, 2025 large
equal/over 500k sats transfers to Genesis block descriptor:
Current balance at time of this post according to
combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50
BTC of coinbase tx: 107.44012671
BTC (includes pending 6274sats waiting for confirmation, the difference (0.07315055
BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).
This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptorsee below accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt
4. Post 67064779 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 20:55:55 CEST 2026) in CAMPANHAS DE ASSINATURAS ATUALIZADAS:
Como que funciona esse programa de recompensa pra criador de conteudos?
Me parece bastante lucrativo, mesmo para quem nao fraude o sistema com muitas contas.
Voce tem o link.?
Eles estão mudando esse sistema.. até agora eles pagavam qualquer pessoa (podia copiar conteúdos).. mas a partir de setembro, se não me engano, vai ser só para criadores de conteúdos originais.. mas era basicamente assinar aquele selo azul, bater uma quantia mínima de views e ter um mínimo de seguidores verificados.
Esse é o novo modelo que estão implementando:
https://x.com/XCreators/status/2085835082166653393Não sei quantos seguidores esse cara ai tinha.. a conta principal dele já foi deletada (as outras também).. pesquisei agora e parece que tinha 270k seguidores e 27 mil posts na principal.
5. Post 67064568 (unedited backup) (by notocactus) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 19:41:43 CEST 2026) in Dice to Seed - comprehensive guide:
Here in the post . He mentions a 50% flawed dice , but looks solid still
It only looks and is solid till it is compromised, and I only want to try with dice method without flaws.
I think the point is that the attacker doesn't know that your seed used a flawed dice, and which number is repeating.
The problem is when you created a wallet with a flawed method used by thousands of people and the flaws are known (like coldcard)
That's true but it also says about a fact that is not comfortable at all because non technical people only can trust technical guys, companies, manufacturers about security and quality of a wallet.
Like I trust Bitcoin Core, trust Electrum because they are very old wallet brands and people technically reviewed those wallets as top notch. I don't know how to do technical things, code reviews and I have no other choice than trusting them while they all can make mistakes from developments, QA/QC to community reviews.
It's stressful during this AI era.
6. Post 67063678 (unedited backup) (by rdluffy) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 14:56:37 CEST 2026) in Safepal hardware wallet review and opinions:
...
Hey, tell us how and why did Jumper gave you this wallet.
Did you had a lot of referrals? high volume? One of the oldest users of jumper?
I used jumper a few times, as your suggestion, and it is quite good and cheap
No referals hehe
I used Jumper a lot since jan 2024 and they have a level system, so I earned points doing trades, volume, different networks...
And they made a partnership with Safepal, I earned a X1 model, I only had to pay the taxes and shipping (not expensive)
They have another advantages, like discounts, free e-sims etc, it's a nice reward
I still use jumper, it's a good service, glad that you liked
7. Post 67063475 (unedited backup) (by SilverCryptoBullet) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 13:48:55 CEST 2026) in Bitcoin’s Security After the Block Subsidy: Who Will Pay for the Network?:
Hal Finney also answered that in 2010.
This question is not new and it has been asked and answered many times so far.
What will happen to Bitcoin after all 21 millions are mined?People did not do their searching for finding available questions and answers, mostly like that, or they did not satisfy with available answers because the future is uncertain, that is true, and many things will change with time for Bitcoin, its development and adoption as well as how Bitcoin miners will get rewards from mining.
If people move to 2nd layer solutions if the fee is too expensive, only big transfer between banks/ecchanges and other big players will happen on-chain.
If anyone are interested in 2nd layer solutions, they can follow up this thread.
Sidechain Observer - Bitcoin L2 Projects & current state of development.
8. Post 67062409 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 02:47:19 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Not long ago, in 2021, binance was a completely free kyc exchange for withdrawals up to 2 btc per Day.
You could just create a throw away email, send 2 btc (20k usd at the time) and withdrawal instantly without any kyc.
Good old times
Those days are gone and those were some really good days for crypto users especially for crypto traders/investors who could easily buy/sell Bitcoin without following the KYC procedure and those days there was no issues related to AML either, but now things are quite different in the market. In current times we're still lucky that we have exchanges like DEX.fo that help us to swap our Bitcoin to other coins without the KYC procedure. These days almost majority if not all traditional CEXs like Binance want KYC details of users because allowing them to withdraw Bitcoin or other crypto currencies so in current days no KYC exchanges are saviors of privacy enthusiasts who don't want to reveal their details to exchanges but still need to swap their one coin to another coin.
9. Post 67062264 (unedited backup) (by r_victory) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 01:27:20 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
~snip
Também consegui pegar essa promoção de um ano e meio, encerra daqui a dez dias e já aceitei a oferta de R$23,99 por mês durante um ano; o preço é menor do que o plano Plus. Uso todos os recursos disponíveis; o Gemini Notebook (anteriormente NotebookLM) é excepcional para o aprendizado de qualquer tema. Assim como você, também uso para ajudar minhas filhas com os estudos. Gosto muito do Antigravity IDE e da sua extensão no VSCode.
Outra que estou usando há quase dois anos gratuitamente é a Perplexity, ótima também, principalmente para pesquisas. O primeiro ano foi por uma parceria com a Vivo e o segundo ano está sendo patrocinado pelo PayPal...
Vou aproveitar o tópico para fazer outra pergunta.. alguém já tentou rodar uma LLM localmente, no seu próprio computador?
Meu PC tem um processador bacana com a GPU integrada e 32GB de RAM; dá para brincar com alguns modelos. Uso principalmente o Ollama e o LM Studio, mas estou sempre testando outros; o OpenCode é muito bom também, é possível integrar com o Ollama.
10. Post 67061478 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 21:04:49 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
Google, microsoft, amazon, meta, nao sao empresas de software propriamente, apesar de tb fazerem software elas sao muito mais do que isso. Sao empresas de cloud, rede social, servicos, hardware, etc...
Exato. Para essas empresas, investir em datacenters, compensa sempre. Porque não estão presas a apenas um tipo de dados/negocio.
Vejo apenas a OpenIA - por ter sido a primeira, e a Anthropic, a se conseguirem firmar na exclusividade da operação IA.
O modelo da Amazon, já foi construído no foco em empresas. Já tem o futuro assegurado, não entrou na "guerra" do publico em geral.
11. Post 67060973 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 18:42:32 CEST 2026) in Bitcoin’s Security After the Block Subsidy: Who Will Pay for the Network?:
If people move to 2nd layer solutions if the fee is too expensive, only big transfer between banks/ecchanges and other big players will happen on-chain.
I can't agree more with this, thanks for sharing it. I read this opinion of Hal for the first time, and now I can't unsee a lot of things which I thought maybe were wrong haha.
Like all these ETFs and other banks moving toward tokenization, adopting digital currency, and eventually all this will streamline what Hal said. So the miners won't make huge losses if I am not wrong, because if we see the volume which is high now, but the fee is low, it will be reversed in the upcoming time. Low volume but high fees. All these banks, when they have to move funds from one place to another, they will also have to pay a huge amount to the miners. By the way, it raises a lot of questions, like hashpower, technological advancements in rigs, etc. Well, I will just search. But miners will eventually find a way, maybe to monetize their mining operations. Don't know, just shooting in the dark haha.
12. Post 67060643 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 17:15:25 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Cara além da ferramenta do street view é MUITO fácil para um criminoso montar um golpe ou planejar um crime
Com seus dados o criminoso vai lá e sabe onde você mora, coloca seu nome no Instagram ou Facebook e consegue ver vários lugares que você vai, frequenta, se fez viagem internacional, se tem iPhone, se tem carro bom, se anda com jóia, relógio etc
Com o e-mail consegue ver vários sites que tem cadastro, pois já vazou várias listas por aí
Com seu telefone consegue ligar pra você, consegue saber alguns lugares que você tem cadastro etc
O cara monta um ficha e se compensar vai pra cima
Eu comentei em outro tópico aqui nessa semana.. sobre uns casos de invasões domiciliares por engano na França..
Os caras não tem esse preparo ai não.. eles pegam um endereço vazado, contratam uns caras aleatórios que estão desesperados por dinheiro e mandam eles irem lá espancar a vítima até que ela transfira as moedas.. ou seja, são dados antigos, não há muito trabalho de inteligência e a parte física é muito amadora.
Tem uns relatos das vítimas de que os sequestradores ficam ao telefone (falando com esse mandante) porque justamente não entendem nada de criptomoedas.
Ou seja, você vai apanhar igual mesmo não tendo criptomoedas.
Esses vazamentos estao mais relacionados a phishing.
Que eu saiba quase todos os usuários da coldcard foram roubados. Mas da ledger/ trezor todos receberam um email spam/phising que a maioria nem viu e foi parar no spam diretamente.
Sei que tem acontecido ataques desse tipo que voce falou a usuarios de cripto, mas pelo que vi sao mais baseados em rede social
A Chainalysis, referência do setor, publicou um relatório sobre esses casos há poucas semanas:
França, Estados Unidos, Brasil e Tailândia registraram o maior número acumulado de incidentes desde 2023, mas a França agora se encontra em um patamar à parte. Antes de 2025, a França havia registrado apenas alguns poucos incidentes violentos conhecidos relacionados a criptomoedas. Em 2025, esse número saltou para 19.
A seguir, examinamos a escala de ataques violentos relacionados a criptomoedas, quais países são os principais focos e o que os padrões *on-chain* revelam sobre os agentes de ameaça envolvidos. Também exploramos como um único vazamento de dados na França pode ter impulsionado um aumento drástico nos ataques contra detentores de criptomoedas.
Um vazamento de dados é a causa mais provável do aumento observado na França. Em 2024, um funcionário do fisco francês na região de Paris teria roubado e vendido dossiês sobre detentores de criptomoedas com alto patrimônio; esses documentos continham nomes, endereços, saldos de ativos, números de telefone e registros fiscais. Relata-se que intermediários criminosos adquiriram esses dossiês.
A frequência dos ataques era de aproximadamente 1,9 por mês em 2025, subindo para cerca de 4,6 por mês no primeiro semestre de 2026. Dois fatores podem estar impulsionando essa aceleração. Primeiro, em janeiro de 2026, as autoridades francesas tornaram público o caso do vazamento fiscal, gerando conscientização sobre o problema e possivelmente levando criminosos a acelerar o uso das informações contidas nos dossiês. Segundo, também em janeiro de 2026, a Waltio — empresa de declaração de impostos sobre criptomoedas — revelou um vazamento separado que afetou cerca de 50.000 usuários, gerando ainda mais dados úteis para que os atacantes criassem listas de alvos.
O *modus operandi* tende a ser amador no momento da violência física, mas profissional nas etapas inicial e final da operação. A maioria dos incidentes analisados foi premeditada, com as vítimas sendo selecionadas a partir de informações expostas — seja por meio de vazamentos de dados, atividades em redes sociais ou informações privilegiadas. Por outro lado, a execução da força física é cada vez mais terceirizada para grupos descartáveis e de baixa qualificação, muitos dos quais são recrutados via aplicativos de mensagens.
Para os detentores de criptomoedas, os dados ressaltam a importância da segurança operacional contra ataques físicos coercitivos (conhecidos como "ataques de chave inglesa" ou *wrench attacks*). Divulgar publicamente a posse de criptomoedas — seja em redes sociais, palestras em conferências ou atividades *on-chain* vinculadas a identidades conhecidas — pode transformar indivíduos em alvos. Práticas de privacidade e estratégias de custódia segura tornam-se cada vez mais importantes; além disso, o vazamento na autoridade fiscal francesa ilustra que as estruturas regulatórias que exigem a coleta de informações sensíveis devem, também, garantir uma proteção robusta desses dados.
Falaram só sobre o caso da agente da Receita francesa e da Waltio.. mas a Ledger é francesa e deve ter exposto dados de muita gente ali.
Aqui no Brasil, por enquanto, é mais rede social mesmo.. visto os casos do Rocelo (2017) e outras figuras públicas (influenciadores) mais recentemente.. acho que a situação mudaria bastante se uma corretora nacional sofresse um vazamento de dados.
13. Post 67060634 (unedited backup) (by tbct_mt2) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 17:12:19 CEST 2026) in If you could teach a new Bitcoin user only 3 things, what would they be?:
For someone who is new to bitcoin, the three lessons I would like them to know is that
1. There is no perfect time to invest in bitcoin- stop waiting for a perfect time, there might be no perfect time.
No perfect time, no perfect price, and timing the market is impossible so let's accumulating bitcoin gradually with time.
2. No fixed amount to invest in bitcoin, invest with what you have and start accumulating.
Must be bigger than Bitcoin dust amount and must be at least equal or bigger than min trading value order on exchanges or market places. Usually it is $10 that is quite possible with many people.
Another thing to know is min withdrawal so that they will have information for planning their purchases and withdrawals like how long they need to accumulate, store coins one exchanges before making 1 withdrawal to save withdrawal fee from exchange.
3. Use the right strategy that will help you achieve your future goal.
DCA for purchases and DCA for taking profit.
[ANN] JJG Sustainable Bitcoin Withdrawal Strategyhttps://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategyhttps://costavg.com/
14. Post 67059240 (unedited backup) (by alexrossi) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 08:46:49 CEST 2026) in Possível vulnerabilidade nas carteiras da Coldcard:
Tem até vários pedidos escritos no OP_RETURN
Coitado dele... ja eu quero é muito distância desses Bitcoins, pois quem receber algum "trocado" disso aí vai precisa é rezar muito para não receber uma "visita" de madrugada com uma ordem judicial nas mãos.
Fico até imaginando os inimigos desse(s) meliantes.... porque pra eles mandar 1 ou 2 BTC para uma wallet alheia é algo insignificante, mas que certamente poderia ferrar com a vida de alguém que ele tenha inimizades.
Cara, pessoalmente acho isso assustador somente se a pessoa fizer algo depois com esse dinheiro
Se alguém receber, é so nao mexer com aquele especifico input (ex. se vc ja tinha saldo de outros imputes, vc ainda pode usar eles), e esperar o law enforcement aparecer
Agora claro, se a pessoa comencar a utilizar, é outros 500
15. Post 67058917 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 04:44:55 CEST 2026) in Possível vulnerabilidade nas carteiras da Coldcard:
Tem até vários pedidos escritos no OP_RETURN
Coitado dele... ja eu quero é muito distância desses Bitcoins, pois quem receber algum "trocado" disso aí vai precisa é rezar muito para não receber uma "visita" de madrugada com uma ordem judicial nas mãos.
Fico até imaginando os inimigos desse(s) meliantes.... porque pra eles mandar 1 ou 2 BTC para uma wallet alheia é algo insignificante, mas que certamente poderia ferrar com a vida de alguém que ele tenha inimizades.
16. Post 67058887 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 04:18:37 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Não entendi mesmo essa sua postagem
Por que o coldcard com 5 traços de gravidade é 10/10 ruim e o vazamento de lista que tem 3 traços seria 60/10 ruim (6 vezes mais)?
Eu simplesmente multipliquei por 2x as estrelas do post pra ficar na escala de 1 a 10 em vez de 1 a 5
Eu acho que ficou claro que a coldcard foi o pior de todos e os outros foram menos pior mas ainda ruim, não sei por que você decidiu fazer um texto falando de influencer. Acho que cada um ve a informação da sua maneira, e para mim ficou claro
Ficou claríssimo, e é justamente esse o problema.
Os outros não são "ainda ruim", os outros são excelentes ou ótimos.
Cara, mas vai e fala isso pro cara que teve a casa invadida porque os criminosos exigiram os bitcoins que ele tinham na hardware-wallet só porque conseguiram os dados vazados.
Uma pessoa que ficou sob a mira de uma arma, que sofreu todo tipo de atrocidade na frente da esposa e filhos, que assistiu eles aliciarem sua familia śo para conseguir que ele entregasse os Bitcoins escondidos.
Tu acha que essa vitima não teria preferido perder os Bitcoins à distância e "em segurança" com o problema da ColdCard?
Eu acho que não existe problema menos grave... qualquer coisa que te deixe vulnerável, em risco é um problema sério.
17. Post 67058548 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 00:15:37 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Não sei nem do que você está falando, ai você vai ficar sendo desrespeitoso em todo topico que eu criar?
Boa sorte na vida pra você
Eu nem fui desrespeitoso com voce. Eu critiquei as informações que voce botou, e o pessoal que critica as wallets do post que voce botou.
Vc que não entendeu e ficou falando do 60/10 e das estrelas
..
Tabom, então eu entendi errado e peço desculpas
Pensei que estava falando de mim já que eu postei a imagem e você respondeu minha postagem falando gente que não entende nada de segurança e até falou "nesse forum"
Mas fazemos as pazes então e vida que segue
18. Post 67058423 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 23:31:49 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Queria entender por que toda hora vejo esse bitmover vindo com uma agressividade desnecessária. Eu vim compartilhar a imagem que achei para buscar pontos de vista diferente, mas ele já vem chamando de péssima analise e de ignorancia tremenda. Parece que todo mundo tem que ser especialista e isso afasta outras pessoas que podem vir querer contribuir
Lembro que voce foi desrespeitoso comigo desd a primeira vez que apareceu por aqui. Dizendo que eu apoiava shitcoins ou cloud storage sei la o que.
Era mais fácil falar mais amigavelmente que não tem risco grande de perder as moedas com as outras carteiras e que são dois problemas de categoria diferente
Acho que voce trouxe um conteúdo ruim e para mim estava óbvio que se seu e-mail vazar seus bitcoins ainda estariam seguros.
Não sei nem do que você está falando, ai você vai ficar sendo desrespeitoso em todo topico que eu criar?
Boa sorte na vida pra você
19. Post 67058013 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 21:39:02 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Eu acho que ficou claro que a coldcard foi o pior de todos e os outros foram menos pior mas ainda ruim, não sei por que você decidiu fazer um texto falando de influencer. Acho que cada um ve a informação da sua maneira, e para mim ficou claro
~~
Fale isso para quem foi sequestrado por causa desses vazamentos
São coisas diferentes. O problema esta quando se põem na mesma equação problemas totalmente diferentes.
Numa escala de 5, dizer que o 5 é o caso do Coldcard - problema na geração das seeds, que permite um ataque obter todas as seeds geradas nessa wallet. Não se pode dizer que um vazamento de contatos, tenha 2 pontos menos.
Podes dizer que esses vazamentos podem dar sequestro, podem. Mas, uma operação de sequestro é muito mais complexa e leva mais riscos para o lado dos criminosos, que normalmente só é levado a cabo em situações muito especificas e com alta taxa de ganho.
O simples facto de um bandindo saber que alguém recebeu uma Ledger, não significa que essa pessoa tem cripto ou que tem muito cripto, que compense o risco de fazer um sequestro. É mais útil a
informação do fisco francês, do que a morada de entrega dos compradores da Ledger. Porque a morada, pode dar a muitas probabilidades, já os dados do fisco ajuda a identificar alvos que realmente compensa.
Por isso, a tabela em si, apresenta uma escala desiquilibrada para o tipo de caso envolvidos. Se fosse um 5 para a Coldcard, e um 2 para a Ledger até poderia fazer mais sentido. Mas, difícil equiparar situações.
Obrigado pela contribuição para a ánalise
Eu entendi o seu ponto de vista. Quando eu vi a imagem, para mim 2 estrelas para 5 era uma diferença grande e os outros também são problemas graves já que um vazamento de dados acaba em sequestros
Queria entender por que toda hora vejo esse bitmover vindo com uma agressividade desnecessária. Eu vim compartilhar a imagem que achei para buscar pontos de vista diferente, mas ele já vem chamando de péssima analise e de ignorancia tremenda. Parece que todo mundo tem que ser especialista e isso afasta outras pessoas que podem vir querer contribuir
Era mais fácil falar mais amigavelmente que não tem risco grande de perder as moedas com as outras carteiras e que são dois problemas de categoria diferente
20. Post 67057857 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 20:55:43 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Eu acho que ficou claro que a coldcard foi o pior de todos e os outros foram menos pior mas ainda ruim, não sei por que você decidiu fazer um texto falando de influencer. Acho que cada um ve a informação da sua maneira, e para mim ficou claro
~~
Fale isso para quem foi sequestrado por causa desses vazamentos
São coisas diferentes. O problema esta quando se pode na mesma equação problemas totalmente diferentes.
Numa escala de 5, dizer que o 5 é o caso do Coldcard - problema na geração das seeds, que permite um ataque obter todas as seeds geradas nessa wallet. Não se pode dizer que um vazamento de contatos, tenha 2 pontos menos.
Podes dizer que esses vazamentos podem dar sequestro, podem. Mas, uma operação de sequestro é muito mais complexa e leva mais riscos para o lado dos criminosos, que normalmente só é levado a cabo em situações muito especificas e com alta taxa de ganho.
O simples facto de um bandindo saber que alguém recebeu uma Ledger, não significa que essa pessoa tem cripto ou que tem muito cripto, que compense o risco de fazer um sequestro. É mais útil a
informação do fisco francês, do que a morada de entrega dos compradores da Ledger. Porque a morada, pode dar a muitas probabilidades, já os dados do fisco ajuda a identificar alvos que realmente compensa.
Por isso, a tabela em si, apresenta uma escala desiquilibrada para o tipo de caso envolvidos. Se fosse um 5 para a Coldcard, e um 2 para a Ledger até poderia fazer mais sentido. Mas, difícil equiparar situações.
O problema é na hora de gastar. Um mecanismo complexo e pouco prático (tipo um celular offline) pode fazer você cometer erros na hora de gastar e expor suas private keys a riscos desnecessários num momento de pressa por exemplo.
Esse é o ponto. Se a pessoa torna o sistema em si frágil, ele perde toda a segurança que possa ter.
Isto é o mesmo de você ter em casa, o melhor alarme do mundo, mas depois ter o comando por baixo do tapete da entrada. Pouco vale ser o melhor, se for mal usado.
Por exemplo, tenho estado a estudar a solução SeedSigner. Aquilo parece realmente bom e viável. Mas, tem um problema (na minha opinião) se a pessoa quiser esse sistema para o "dia a dia".
Cada vez que quer validar uma transação, tem que apontar o equipamento para um QR Code, que terá a seed de validação.
Se a pessoa fizer isso pontualmente, é tranquilo. Mas, se começar a ter de fazer muitas vezes, acaba por ter o QR Code mal guardado ou exposto a terceiros verem e captarem o QR.
Ou seja, a pessoa para montar o seu setup, tem de pensar não só na segurança, mas na forma que usa.
Tem de procurar equilibrar as duas coisas. Caso contrario, vai acabar por expor uma delas.
No final o caso da Coldcard é uma novidade no mercado. Normalmente isso significa que as soluções existentes vão ficar melhores, não piores. Porque uma Ledger ou uma Trezor, não vão querer cair no mesmo erro, irão fazer tudo para garantir que o problema não ocorra e melhorar os seus equipamentos.
21. Post 67057538 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 19:32:13 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
Voce paga $ 20 mensal? Acho que é o mesmo valor do gemini. E eles estão me oferecendo 75% off, seriam uns ~$5 mensal ou uns $55 anual.
Pelo que vi são compatíveis
Para poder usar o antigravity, o preço é de +/-25€/mes. O Chatgpt é uns 18€.
Então ainda não sinto a necessidade de mudar. Até porque o chatgpt já sabe mais ou menos o meu método de trabalho. Migrar tudo, daria algum trabalho.
Vamos ver se um dia essa bolha vai estourar.. esses nomes como Nvidia (hardware) não devem cair, já que não há muita competição.. mas o setor de software é muito concorrido.
Os data centers não vão desaparecer, mesmo que a bolha no IA arrebentar.
Porque os data center são usados para várias coisas, e muitas empresas de IA usa data centers de terceiros.
Montar os seus próprios data center só devem ser uma ou duas empresas.
Depois tens são as empresas de data centers atuais a aumentar as suas capacidades.
Se a bolha arrebentar, eles desviam os recursos para outro tipo de projetos. Se for preciso até o mercado em segunda mão é bem movimento nesse setor.
Acho que a bolha está é no lado das empresas de software. Tens muitas ligadas ao IA que fazem a mesma coisa, e no final estão a usar os principais serviços de IA. São empresas de prompt e não dia IA propriamente dita. Essas sim, estão mais em risco.
22. Post 67057458 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 19:09:25 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
Os maiores players do mundo usam hardware wallets. Por exemplo, a bybit usa ledger para proteger suas moedas.
Pelo que eu lembro eles migraram para um serviço de custódia da Zodia (que o Standard Chartered comprou) logo depois daquela perda de milhões.. mas o erro foi da Safe Wallet, não da Ledger nesse caso.
Sobre o celular.. o problema da Coldcard foi na geração das chaves.. o resto funciona como prometido.. então se você usar um celular, mas usar um gerador ruim, vai ter o mesmo problema.. o irônico é que usuários avançados perderam dinheiro com essa falha da Coldcard.
23. Post 67057338 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 18:34:01 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
Voce paga $ 20 mensal? Acho que é o mesmo valor do gemini. E eles estão me oferecendo 75% off, seriam uns ~$5 mensal ou uns $55 anual.
Pelo que vi são compatíveis
É a mesma coisa mesmo.. tem dias que um alucina mais que o outro.. às vezes eu até uso os dois em "simultâneo" para que me deem uma resposta decente para perguntas mais difíceis.
Estou querendo sair do Grok para ir pra um outro melhor. Tem o tal do adapta.org que diz reunir as melhores IA, mas tem gente que diz que isso não é verdade, o que vocês acham?
Esses pacotes de IA sao apenas pacotes mesmo.
O que eu vejo o pessoal falando é que essas empresas lucram com as pessoas que usam pouco a ferramenta (porque fica sobrando tokens no fim do mês).. acho que depende o quanto você usa.. mas como é possível usar todos de graça, com limites diários, dá para ir pulando manualmente de um em um.
Minha opinião, posso estar errado, é de que essas promoções de uso gratuito diminuíram muito e vão secar em breve... já passou a fase de marketing e angariar usuários, agora a missão/necessidade dessas empresas é correr atrás do prejuízo.
Tem gente dizendo que a bolha das IAs vai ser isso ai.. muitas empresas com modelos parecidos.. não tem tanta diferença usar um ou outro modelo equivalente.. a diferença é o dinheiro gastado em marketing e promoções.. acredito que ainda há um bom espaço para isso.. como podemos ver aqui no próprio tópico, ninguém tem um preferido e as empresas seguem lutando para conquistar clientes..
Esses dias o Arthur Hayes também falou que os investimentos em IA mais se parecem com investimentos em imóveis do que em tecnologia.. porque essas empresas estão basicamente erguendo data centers.. e ano a ano, o hardware vai evoluindo, sendo necessário espaços cada vez menores..
Lembra aquelas fotos antigas de computadores gigantes:
Fonte:
https://www.reddit.com/r/OldSchoolCool/comments/3l18hv/5_mb_harddrive_being_shipped_by_ibm_1956/Agora imagina como serão esses data centers atuais daqui 50 anos.
Vamos ver se um dia essa bolha vai estourar.. esses nomes como Nvidia (hardware) não devem cair, já que não há muita competição.. mas o setor de software é muito concorrido.
24. Post 67057082 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 17:15:49 CEST 2026) in Todas hardware wallets sofreram grandes problemas. Qual a solução?:
A lista mostra todos os ataques que hardware wallets sofreram em 2026, de erro de firmware até golpes com vazamentos de bancos de dados
Comprar uma hardware wallet ainda é a melhor solução? Eu penso se não vale a pena comprar um celular android barato e usar ele como carteira desconectada com um programa de wallet confiável. O que acham da ideia?
O problema são essas péssimas análises.
Dizer que a Ledger e a Trezor tem 3 tracinhos ruins e a coldcard tem 5 é duma ignorância tremenda.
se todos os seus bitcoins roubados está 10/10 ruim
Mas pra quem fez esse quadro ta 60/10 ruim se o seu e-mail vazar em uma lista com 1milhão de outros emails, mostrando que você já teve contato com uma ledger ou trezor (pode ser como cliente, como agente de marketing, etc).
Claro que não, a ledger a trezor não mereciam nem meia estrela nessa listinha ai.
Eu vi tb tanta gente de birra com a coinomi pq um usuário perdeu fundos dizendo que a seed ia pro google tradutor. No final, ele foi o único usuário que perdeu dinheiro.
Eu tenho saldos na coinomi, na metamask desde 2017 que eu criei sem cuidado especial nenhum, ja recuperei a seed mil vezes em computador/mobile etc e nunca fui hackeado.
Acho que muita gente que não entende nada de segurança fica fazendo listinhas e memes e falando coisas agressivas nesse forum e no X, e como resultado fica circulando muita informação ruim e errada.
Vivemos num mundo que um influencer com segundo grau completo e que cursou um tecnologo de 2 anos fala um dia sobre guerra na Ucrania e no outro está falando sobre ciber segurança, sem nunca ter estudado nada do assunto nenhum. E a pessoa que estudou e tem autoridade não consegue engajamento.
E isso reflete no software. O erro da coldcard é muito banal, eles erraram no mais simples. O que eles fizeram errado 99% das outras wallets fizeram certo. Por isso meus saldos antigos de mobile/web wallets estão intactos
Não entendi mesmo essa sua postagem
Por que o coldcard com 5 traços de gravidade é 10/10 ruim e o vazamento de lista que tem 3 traços seria 60/10 ruim (6 vezes mais)?
Eu acho que ficou claro que a coldcard foi o pior de todos e os outros foram menos pior mas ainda ruim, não sei por que você decidiu fazer um texto falando de influencer
Bom que na imagem ta escrito:
More red means more damage. Only one of these was the device itself failing.
Porque de fato, ate o momento so a coldcard fez algo irreversível com as criptos e de impacto direto
As outras sao perfeitas? Claro que nao, mas estão ainda muito longe de ser criticáveis numa lista junto com a coldcard
So a minha opinião
Fale isso para quem foi sequestrado por causa desses vazamentos
25. Post 67057031 (unedited backup) (by Catenaccio) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 17:02:55 CEST 2026) in If you could teach a new Bitcoin user only 3 things, what would they be?:
The very first thing I will teach a newbie is that Bitcoin won't make you rich in short duration and if you are coming with that expectation then don't invest in Bitcoin.
Such time for getting rich quickly with Bitcoin gone years ago and with time, with market cycles, there will be less ROI annually and cyclically. If anyone hope for such "get rich quick" opportunity with Bitcoin since 2026, it's unrealistic and impossible investment target.
The second thing I would tech him is that since you are investing for long term you must have a money that you can forget for at least 4 years or even more. This is because if you don't have such money then you won't be able to invest for long duration. Lastly I will advice him to pay strict for security of your Bitcoin because once stolen or lost, you can't recover your Bitcoins.
Investing money in Bitcoin, holding your bitcoin for long term is very good. This chart shows very strong exponential ROI growth of Bitcoin over years since 2009 to 2026.
https://charts.bitbo.io/yearly-candles/This map of holding can give more information and motivation for investment and holding.
https://hodl.camp/If need more guides on how to invest, how to withdraw profit with time, this topic is helpful
[ANN] JJG Sustainable Bitcoin Withdrawal Strategyhttps://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy
26. Post 67055994 (unedited backup) (by dufresne) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 10:53:13 CEST 2026) in Do i need Electrum’s latest version:
Wipe the laptop, install Linux, keep it offline. Encrypt the drive if you're sure you won't forget the password. Create, test and securely store your backups before funding a wallet.
I can easily set this up and for me it is a more simpler solution that the one suggested by pooya87, involving USB sticks. I only need to spend a very short time to understand it, but the only problem with what i already have is that it is on a mobile phone, so i think a dedicated laptop is a better option for me. The only disadvantage is that it is more expensive than a USB stick.
I agree that this might be cheaper than a hardware wallet. But I always think it is safer for people who aren't very knowledged about bitcoin to buy a hardware wallet.
I have bitcoin knowledge, nothing close to some of the guys that have offerred solutions here, but doing this safely would not be hard for me. I don’t think i need a hardware wallet right now, except you believe it is more secure than the options suggested?
27. Post 67055682 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 08:25:07 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
O que vocês acham? Qual voces usam? Sabem de algum gratuito bom ou melhor ou outra promoção?
Eu tenho usado o ChatGPT mesmo, e tenho tido assinatura Plus.
Apesar de as vezes alucinar um pouco, mas acho que acontece com todos, no geral estou satisfeito.
Tenho usado o Codex, a versão deles para programação, e estou muito satisfeito.
Para já, esta a um bom preço, tem cumprido, por isso vou ficando.
O da Google, as vezes também uso o free, e tem sido bom, mas a versão paga é muito alta na minha opinião (fase ao que pago no ChatGPT).
28. Post 67055477 (unedited backup) (by Darker45) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 05:11:31 CEST 2026) in Tether finally gets a full audit by KPMG:
I don't think Tether has ever been audited. This misleading claim was precisely the reason why they were fined tens of millions of dollars by CFTC in 2021.
What happened days ago hit the news because that was the first time. Tether's gold bars, for example, that back your XAUT were physically counted for the first time ever by KPMG.
Regardless, however, this audit doesn't necessarily cleanse every piece of doubt on Tether's health. Apart from the announcements, press releases, and confirmations, the full audit report, the statements, breakdowns, and the like remain private and undisclosed.
You can see many third party audits here:
https://tether.to/en/transparency/?tab=reportsThey have been making such third party reports for quite some time. I don't understand why would those reports made by Independent Auditors wouldn't count.
Most probably because they aren't audits in a strict sense. While they're done by independent auditing firms, what they did are simply agreed-upon procedures, not audits.
Hence, the third party reports provided in the end aren't audit reports but simply attestation reports. And attestations don't take a comprehensive, broad, or deep examination of the books, internal controls, counterparty risks, and so on. They're simply just confirmations of the particular figures provided by Tether itself on a specific date.
29. Post 67055395 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 03:42:13 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
O que vocês acham? Qual voces usam? Sabem de algum gratuito bom ou melhor ou outra promoção?
Eu tenho usado o Perplexity desde que postaram aqui o uso gratuito pelo período de 1 ano para quem tinha conta no PayPal...
agradecimento enorme ao @mikel_012 pela dica, porém já se vão 9 meses também e resta menos de 3 nessa mordomia.
Para o trabalho, tenho usado um modelo do deepseek v4 flash em um server parrudo que instalaram na empresa, em uma rede privada ele tem acesso ao codigo fonte completo e tá ajudando D+ mesmo na programação, então com isso eu já economizo muitos tokens que eu usava antes no Perplexity.
E para uso pessoal, os limites gratuitos do chatGpt e Gemini são mais do que o suficiente pra mim
30. Post 67055100 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Tue Aug 18 00:30:20 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
Ano passado eu consegui o Gemini Pro por 1 ano e meio de graça, com uma promoção de estudante.
Eu estou adorando, uso aquele Nano Banana para vídeos (que sao ótimos, outro dia usei pra explicar materia de ciências pro meu filho foi incrível), uso o antigravity IDE para programar, o gemini para conversar etc.
O antigravity é muito bom, ele me da uma quantidade mais que suficiente pra mim de tokens do Gemini Flash 3.6 e do Claude Opus (poucos tokens)
Mas o plano free esta chegando ao fim e me ofereceram renovar por 288 reais por mais um ano. Achei barato e estou pensando em pagar.
O que vocês acham? Qual voces usam? Sabem de algum gratuito bom ou melhor ou outra promoção?
No momento eu assino o supergrok que eu peguei de uma promoção de 3 meses, mas acho que o chatgpt, mesmo gratuito produz resultados melhores, e o grok às vezes demora pra responder e isso me incomoda um pouco, mas agora parece que tem sido menos. Mas penso em assinar o openAI, todo mundo fala que ele é melhorzinho.
Mas o grok está me servindo bem, ele produz tabelas do jeito que eu gosto, faz scripts bem legais, esses dias eu até adaptei 2 userscripts aqui do BTCTalk para o ALTT, aquele de
traduzir postagens pro seu idioma nativo (ou qualquer idioma), eu fiz inclusive algumas modificações nele como: ler por voz pro idioma que vocÊ quiser (aparentemente, no original só permitia ouvir do idioma configurado no sistema operacional ou navegador, não tenho certeza), incluindo inglês (eu também escuto coisas em inglês e pra aprendizado) e também permite escolher a voz, o userscript original não permite escolher a voz e eu tive que inclusive baixar o idioma de voz em inglês para o windows pra poder escutar em inglês... as vozes são meio robotizadas e é meio cansativo, é muito legal pra dar aquela estudada básica no listening de vez em quando.
Eu também adaptei aquele userscript de copy
paste quote do TryNinja pro ALTT (originalmente, ele só funciona no BTCTalk), eu tô testando esses dois userscripts, depois faço um post lá.
Algumas o grok conseguiu de primeira ou de segunda no prompt. MUito bom. Tudo isso sem eu saber programação. Estou testando por esses dias e está funcionando muito bem!
QUando eu fizer os tópicos lá (ou aqui) vou dar os méritos pros devidos autores, incluindo postar nos devidos tópicos pra sugerir como melhoria se eles quiserem.
Fora isso, estou meio desatualizado em IA, por exemplo, eu até hoje não usei o claude, esse antigravity que vc citou aí,
Qual que está sendo melhor na opinião de vocês para:
-editar vídeos ou imagens
-produzir scripts, plugins, extensões para aplicativos
Estou querendo sair do Grok para ir pra um outro melhor. Tem o tal do adapta.org que diz reunir as melhores IA, mas tem gente que diz que isso não é verdade, o que vocês acham?
31. Post 67054524 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Mon Aug 17 21:29:49 CEST 2026) in Qual plano de IA vocês mais usam? usam planos pagos?:
Ano passado eu consegui o Gemini Pro por 1 ano e meio de graça, com uma promoção de estudante.
Eu estou adorando, uso aquele Nano Banana para vídeos (que sao ótimos, outro dia usei pra explicar materia de ciências pro meu filho foi incrível), uso o antigravity IDE para programar, o gemini para conversar etc.
O antigravity é muito bom, ele me da uma quantidade mais que suficiente pra mim de tokens do Gemini Flash 3.6 e do Claude Opus (poucos tokens)
Mas o plano free esta chegando ao fim e me ofereceram renovar por 288 reais por mais um ano. Achei barato e estou pensando em pagar.
O que vocês acham? Qual voces usam? Sabem de algum gratuito bom ou melhor ou outra promoção?
Postei sobre tokens de graça no ChatGPT, dá uma olhada:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591180.0Nesse caso ai, paga conforme usa..
Fora isso só uso grátis.. Gemini tem um bom limite para enviar arquivos, ChatGPT é decente para outras coisas.. ambos fazem umas X imagens de graça por dia, etc.. já me atende bem.. já paguei os dois e não vi tanta diferença para o plano free (mas não faço vídeos/etc)
32. Post 67054069 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Aug 17 19:11:13 CEST 2026) in Help generating true 256-bits entropy wallet:
I think you can generate the seed from the binary using iancoleman.io/bip39 tool
I'd kinda want to manually verify that.
33. Post 67052856 (unedited backup) (by MusaMohamed) (scraped on Mon Aug 17 13:06:07 CEST 2026) in How have you ever enjoy your bitcoin investment :
I think of bitcoin investment every day, but i have never see anyone talking about how he have enjoyed his bitcoin investment since it started Bitcoin investment, i want to know how many of us here have used bitcoin to become rich, and what you have achieved since the time you started the race of bitcoin.
You enjoy your Bitcoin investment when you see your portfolio growing in $ value and in positive ROI. It's very human and everyone would feel happy during such times but how long does it last depends on your investment vision, strategy and plan. If you do the right things like investment in long term, your emotion and psychology will be less affected negatively with short term loss. Because with such investment vision, you know that short term loss will not last forever, it will turn to be profit, even very good profit in the future.
Some ideas for your investment practice.
[ANN] JJG Sustainable Bitcoin Withdrawal Strategyhttps://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy
34. Post 67052411 (unedited backup) (by Darker45) (scraped on Mon Aug 17 09:52:37 CEST 2026) in Tether finally gets a full audit by KPMG:
~snip~
I think since 2021 tether became so big and open to third party audits that people arent suggesting it would collapse anymore.
I think tether is quite safe for now. I do own some tether gold and I am not worried about it
I don't think Tether has ever been
audited. This misleading claim was precisely the reason why they were fined tens of millions of dollars by CFTC in 2021.
What happened days ago hit the news because that was the first time. Tether's gold bars, for example, that back your XAUT were physically counted for the first time ever by KPMG.
Regardless, however, this audit doesn't necessarily cleanse every piece of doubt on Tether's health. Apart from the announcements, press releases, and confirmations, the full audit report, the statements, breakdowns, and the like remain private and undisclosed.
35. Post 67051398 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sun Aug 16 23:20:07 CEST 2026) in Priamex ♻️ FREE raffle #4 welcome round | Prize pool $30, Winner takes all!:
Event deadline Saturday 23:59 UTC.
RULES
- We have now 10 slots! YES, 10 slots only
- You must complete a successful order with Priamex from the time this event is live until the deadline time.
- The winner takes all!
- Last date to book your slot: Saturday 23:59 UTC
- Pick a SLOT you like.
- You can not edit your entry. If necessary then remove the old entry and make a new one.
- We will find the winnersusing Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
- Any questions? Ask on the 💰 R7 Bounty Hunters - Telegram Chat
- My decisions are final, you must follow the Priamex Terms
- You will receive reward directly to your Bitcoin address.
SLOTS
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
ENTER
Slot Number:
bech32:
Last two character of the order ID:
Full Order ID: Provide via PM
Accepted slots
R7 Promotions General Disclaimer: We would like to make it clear that R7 Promotions 💹📈 Bitcointalk Campaign Management 💪🔥 Signature & Bounty, managed by Bitcointalk member AB de Royse777, is an independent entity and is not directly affiliated with any of the crypto startups we advertise. While we strive to promote these startups in the best possible light, our views and opinions expressed in our advertising materials do not necessarily reflect those of the startups themselves. We work with various clients across the crypto industry, and our goal is to provide high-quality advertising services to help them achieve their marketing objectives.
36. Post 67050941 (unedited backup) (by New Judgement) (scraped on Sun Aug 16 20:52:07 CEST 2026) in Worth $70 Billion, Yet Hasn't Touched a Single Cent! The Mystery of Satoshi:
70 billion.
Normal people doesnt need so much money.
He probably got "only" about 100 million for himself and he is living very discrete somewhere.
I don’t really know if normal people don’t need that much money in their lives, but I’m sure if I have such money I will still be a normal person. But jokes apart, people don’t really need that much to live a good and decent life. If everyone can have this mentality, I don’t think people will be killing themselves over having so much money they can’t finish in their life. But the greed of keeping money for generations yet unborn that they not even sure of, won’t allow them. But they forget that if everyone just get exactly what they will need for their lives, that the generations yet unborn will also meet what they will need when they get here.
37. Post 67050661 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Sun Aug 16 19:26:55 CEST 2026) in Does Bitcoin transaction fee grows based on how much you sending? :
Guys I want to know something about Bitcoin wallet.
I've been able to transfer small amount of Bitcoin from the exchange to my wallet, back and forth and the fee is like 12 cent to 14 cents but I want to know what will happen if i move big amount.
To get what I am saying clearly, does Bitcoin transaction fee gets bigger when the Bitcoin you plan to move is also bigger or they stays the same?
How much in equivalent $ you are sending does not affect transaction fees.
Because Bitcoin transaction fees is calculated with this formula
Transaction fee = transaction size * fee rate.
Fee rate is what you are freely to choose.
Transaction size does not depend on your transaction value (how much).
How to calculate transaction Size (vbytes) for Segwit Addresses.https://jlopp.github.io/bitcoin-transaction-size-calculator/https://bitcoinops.org/en/tools/calc-size/You can try with this plot and understand more.
Plot your transaction in the mempoolhttps://bitcoindata.science/plot-your-transaction-in-mempool
38. Post 67049800 (unedited backup) (by Filicius) (scraped on Sun Aug 16 15:06:07 CEST 2026) in Worth $70 Billion, Yet Hasn't Touched a Single Cent! The Mystery of Satoshi:
70 billion.
Normal people doesnt need so much money.
He probably got "only" about 100 million for himself and he is living very discrete somewhere.
Haha, this is what we call a hero, right? I mean, he may be enjoying his life on any verge in this world, and we are speculating about him. There is too much speculation about Satoshi Nakamoto, whether he is still alive or has died. And if he is still alive, he must be living a no-name life with all of his luxuries. Maybe all he needed from Bitcoin he might have taken already in his other wallet before becoming an anonymous person, and maybe he is using this today. Well, have you ever thought what if the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto becomes open in front of the world? What I personally think is that the market can crash if his real identity is revealed in front of the whole world (Just a point of view). What do you think about it?
I think a big deal of Bitcoin's power lies in the narrative. Of course, the technical part and the idea of a ledger that would be unfalsifiable are brilliant, but what really hooks many of us is the philosophy and the halo of mystery that surrounds it, with the figure of Satoshi, which we end up idealizing and into which each of us projects part of ourselves. That's why, as long as we don't know who he really is, there will be as many Satoshis as there are people. In some cases, only the desert island on which he is located varies, but it is nice to think that there are endless theories about him.
39. Post 67049460 (unedited backup) (by vapourminer) (scraped on Sun Aug 16 12:28:01 CEST 2026) in Analysis:
And, by the way, weren't you (@bitmover) working on some tweaks to a new fuck you status page/tool that we might be able to agree to go public with? or maybe I missed some of the latests tweaks to such new tool that might be in my court...
I am expecting your reviews to make it public! Do you think we can make it public already?
That URL is working, we can already share it.
I was waiting for you to respond to our latest interactions.. Maybe we can take this to PMs..
bump
40. Post 67047166 (unedited backup) (by snowpega) (scraped on Sat Aug 15 17:49:07 CEST 2026) in Worth $70 Billion, Yet Hasn't Touched a Single Cent! The Mystery of Satoshi:
70 billion.
Normal people doesnt need so much money.
He probably got "only" about 100 million for himself and he is living very discrete somewhere.
Haha, this is what we call a hero, right? I mean, he may be enjoying his life on any verge in this world, and we are speculating about him. There is too much speculation about Satoshi Nakamoto, whether he is still alive or has died. And if he is still alive, he must be living a no-name life with all of his luxuries. Maybe all he needed from Bitcoin he might have taken already in his other wallet before becoming an anonymous person, and maybe he is using this today. Well, have you ever thought what if the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto becomes open in front of the world? What I personally think is that the market can crash if his real identity is revealed in front of the whole world (Just a point of view). What do you think about it?
41. Post 67046464 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Aug 15 13:30:43 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (58) 15022 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (16) 10356 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5630 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 11329 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4764 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 2887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2791 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (4) 9951 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 6836 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 8924 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 113670:
Mitchell (
Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 2202 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2173 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 6270 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2600 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2174 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (11) 6778 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 1949 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 189967:
buckrogers (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 196 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2387 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 206143:
Lesbian Cow (
Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 13837 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 6270 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 6776 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 6928 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3873 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 10598 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 746 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 4446 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3967 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 11410 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 12083 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 395806:
o_solo_miner (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4533 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2881 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 4676 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (62) 21420 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3139 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 533583:
Lucius (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 6688 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2157 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3893 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1360 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3666 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1318 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6909 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 4213 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 2012 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2328 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 5148 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 4639 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 15621 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2338 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3641 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (39) 13236 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1483 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2382 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2102 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 10108 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 2650 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 3625 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 7656 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11374 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3494 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2622 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 21217 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2989 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2615 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 2607 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (31) 5777 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 5766 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1609 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3782 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1910 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1625 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4156 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 855 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5731 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (28) 8234 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 10110 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1616 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2745549:
decodx (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 963 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 10008 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 6476 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1288 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3601 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 3519432:
SirJohnVonSlotty (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1020 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (
8876 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
935 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
50 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
193 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4528:
Matt Corallo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: neutral) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 10354:
JJG (
Trust: neutral) (
10 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 10502:
SgtSpike (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 11275:
wariner (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 11671:
Kluge (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
21 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 12089:
piotr_n (
Trust: neutral) (
467 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 12459:
CydeWeys (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. Post 67046377 (unedited backup) (by Cricktor) (scraped on Sat Aug 15 12:48:13 CEST 2026) in 2.62x BTC dumped to legacy address of Genesis block:
...
Yes, I know bitcoindata.science and have used some of their data display endpoints in the past. It's also mentioned at the very bottom of my update posts here.
We have another update "on the table" which sat since yesterday in mempool with a quite well tuned low feerate. I like those transactions which don't overpay fees by a large margin.
Past March 14
th, 2025 large
equal/over 500k sats transfers to Genesis block descriptor:
Current balance at time of this post according to
combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50
BTC of coinbase tx: 107.36697616
BTC (no pending sats waiting for confirmation, the difference (0.0137624
BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).
This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptorsee below accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt
43. Post 67045830 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Aug 15 07:31:13 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-08-07_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1786067812 1 5588886.msg66964191 252510 533583
1786067609 1 5588886.msg66964091 252510 1096237
1786067209 1 5584694.msg67015959 3611603 85021
1786066927 1 178336.msg67019150 198573 64507
1786066802 1 178336.msg67019150 120694 64507
1786066688 1 178336.msg67018502 120694 317618
1786063683 1 5579364.msg67017467 3725936 3641264
1786063299 1 5588886.msg66962146 252510 35
1786062823 1 5590074.msg67000949 33156 3735599
1786062449 1 5588886.msg66960427 252510 3489966
1786062048 1 5588886.msg66960230 252510 1137579
1786061679 1 5590594.msg67018928 113670 78147
1786061414 1 5584094.msg66765965 3721432 2568422
1786060707 1 5590579.msg67018157 1137579 1862043
1786060643 1 631891.msg67018759 3552984 3418694
1786060628 1 5406159.msg67018123 1137579 2739424
1786059754 1 5588206.msg67011053 3613415 3739827
1786058698 1 5579785.msg67018486 1247226 2965357
1786058549 2 5077229.msg67018362 407174 18977
1786058166 2 5561668.msg67017926 407174 912328
1786057739 1 5588855.msg66958358 3721432 3761497
1786057646 2 5590583.msg67018460 1052091 3545617
1786057465 1 5586355.msg66859411 3471145 3756384
1786057249 1 5590549.msg67018220 2004043 113670
1786056961 1 232519.msg67018459 3506458 350580
1786056873 1 5571375.msg67018628 3721432 3687357
1786056545 2 5590557.msg67017349 1052091 3717173
1786056407 1 5224503.msg67018857 355846 198573
1786056257 2 5589927.msg67009028 1554927 941526
1786056083 1 5589927.msg67016204 1554927 252510
1786056051 2 5589927.msg67009028 1554927 941526
1786056009 1 5589903.msg67018833 3513442 3418694
1786055659 1 5590459.msg67014291 1247226 3764227
1786055412 21 5571375.msg67006177 1852120 113670
1786055388 3 5571375.msg67018628 1852120 3687357
1786055303 1 5590459.msg67016847 1247226 1059082
1786054991 1 631891.msg67016800 3693329 3513442
1786054669 1 5571375.msg67018628 3513442 3687357
1786054040 1 5590522.msg67016228 313016 516434
1786053143 1 4768828.msg43070411 252510 2307759
1786052980 2 5588206.msg67011053 3720214 3739827
1786052927 1 5589474.msg66980915 3558380 2739424
1786052713 2 5589607.msg66989098 3467805 3525056
1786052604 2 5585334.msg66852477 3467805 3525178
1786052131 1 5590579.msg67018153 3534475 1099980
1786051995 1 5571375.msg67018628 113670 3687357
1786051353 1 5590496.msg67018573 816896 2776678
1786050874 1 5590515.msg67016696 113670 35
1786050862 1 5590515.msg67017435 113670 1478835
1786050701 1 5589927.msg67017915 289817 3453140
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2943 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 07 Aug 2026 03:56:52 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lucius (
history) for
Re: Signature Ban Appeal Thread: appeal your sigban here.
On Fri 07 Aug 2026 03:53:29 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
tbct_mt2 (
history) for
Re: Signature Ban Appeal Thread: appeal your sigban here.
On Fri 07 Aug 2026 03:46:49 AM CEST,
laijsica (
history) sent 1 Merit to
TheAndy500 (
history) for
Re: ✅[CFNP] Kikabet.com Casino - Signature Campaign - H/L $75/week | Sr. $50/week.
On Fri 07 Aug 2026 03:42:07 AM CEST,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
philipma1957 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 07 Aug 2026 03:40:02 AM CEST,
xhomerx10 (
history) sent 1 Merit to
philipma1957 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (607 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8876 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 935 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3763895:
Papa_Mojet (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3764024:
ColdcardVictim (
history) earned: 119 Merit.
3764049:
OLDBOY 003 (
history) earned: 22 Merit.
3764119:
IntervalWalker (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3764227:
Zeto Cash (
history) earned: 21 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3761497: niso23
3761513: Casper7
3761530: Priamex.com
3761538: Benedesuuuk
3761595: Khaleedmaine
3761676: Lytvynets1
3761774: scoorched
3761866: Otomato
3761923: Korvane.io
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw
3762146: Cinexa
3762178: Bamskki
3762182: Aliikhanii
3762184: xiaoyu1222006
3762229: lattica-core
3762275: DigitalDonkeyBlocks
3762314: apide01
3762360: Midisk
3762413: Ndnx1
3762435: exWhale
3762536: DurakCrypto
3762577: Sowat
3762578: sidrabtc
3762667: Luckiest
3762721: Fire_man
3762844: monerica
3762860: PolarCrypto
3762899: Akos26
3763135: Geould
3763168: jaxx.bet
3763191: greysonz
3763248: xxxmourn
3763270: swapsslol
3763276: MegRewards
3763338: omenswap
3763404: Rmun1217
3763459: ohio_jaunt
3763560: paygate-love
3763611: Hazebet.co
3763618: rice_cooker
3763696: Gerdino
3763797: SCORAS
3763826: puzzle_72_worker
3763872: Danish Ali
3763895: Papa_Mojet
3764024: ColdcardVictim
3764049: OLDBOY 003
3764119: IntervalWalker
3764227: Zeto Cash
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8876
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:2
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14547:15022
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1492
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3761497:0:39
3761513:0:2
3761530:0:31
3761538:7:15
3761595:1:7
3761676:0:2
3761774:0:1
3761866:0:1
3761923:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1
3762146:0:12
3762178:0:8
3762182:0:1
3762184:0:1
3762229:0:1
3762275:0:2
3762314:0:3
3762360:0:1
3762413:0:1
3762435:0:1
3762536:0:2
3762577:0:1
3762578:0:2
3762667:0:4
3762721:0:1
3762844:0:2
3762860:0:10
3762899:0:1
3763135:0:2
3763168:0:1
3763191:0:1
3763248:0:1
3763270:0:1
3763276:0:4
3763338:0:1
3763404:0:3
3763459:0:2
3763560:0:1
3763611:0:1
3763618:0:1
3763696:0:1
3763797:0:7
3763826:0:10
3763872:0:1
3763895:0:1
3764024:20:119
3764049:0:22
3764119:0:1
3764227:0:21
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51668Sample 1. 21420 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1120 unique users in 12416 transactions
2. 21217 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 772 unique users in 11603 transactions
3. 18912 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9991 transactions
4. 15621 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8966 transactions
5. 15022 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1230 unique users in 5453 transactions
6. 13837 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 736 unique users in 9109 transactions
7. 13236 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 616 unique users in 4950 transactions
8. 12083 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 504 unique users in 6643 transactions
9. 12027 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 535 unique users in 6162 transactions
10. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
11. 11410 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 617 unique users in 6647 transactions
12. 11374 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6472 transactions
13. 11329 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 588 unique users in 6510 transactions
14. 10598 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 674 unique users in 5710 transactions
15. 10464 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5348 transactions
16. 10386 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 566 unique users in 4603 transactions
17. 10356 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 347 unique users in 3773 transactions
18. 10110 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 541 unique users in 4662 transactions
19. 10108 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 406 unique users in 3514 transactions
20. 10008 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 474 unique users in 5015 transactions
21. 9951 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 459 unique users in 5441 transactions
22. 9267 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 5011 transactions
23. 8951 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 411 unique users in 4619 transactions
24. 8924 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 586 unique users in 5291 transactions
25. 8876 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 412 unique users in 935 transactions
26. 8803 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 456 unique users in 5213 transactions
27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
28. 8234 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 465 unique users in 4513 transactions
29. 7656 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 594 unique users in 4550 transactions
30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
31. 7418 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4244 transactions
32. 7313 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1871 transactions
33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
34. 7047 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 230 unique users in 4020 transactions
35. 6928 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3520 transactions
36. 6909 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 405 unique users in 3803 transactions
37. 6836 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 347 unique users in 3206 transactions
38. 6778 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 494 unique users in 3762 transactions
39. 6776 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3042 transactions
40. 6751 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 958 unique users in 4393 transactions
41. 6688 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 533 unique users in 3870 transactions
42. 6582 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 207 unique users in 3804 transactions
43. 6531 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 432 unique users in 3572 transactions
44. 6476 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 437 unique users in 3784 transactions
45. 6367 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 626 unique users in 3586 transactions
46. 6270 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3494 transactions
47. 6270 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 222 unique users in 3647 transactions
48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
49. 5777 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 460 unique users in 4059 transactions
50. 5766 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2733 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51619. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51620. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51621. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51622. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51623. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51624. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51625. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51626. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51627. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51628. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51629. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51630. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51631. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51632. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51633. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51634. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51635. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51636. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51637. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51638. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51639. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51640. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51641. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51642. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51643. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51644. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51645. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51646. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51647. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51648. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51649. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51650. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51651. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51652. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51653. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51654. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51655. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51656. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51657. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51658. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51659. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51660. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51661. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51662. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51663. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51664. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51665. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51666. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51667. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51668. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26731Sample 1. 77300 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 912 unique users in 13103 transactions
2. 71941 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2301 unique users in 31424 transactions
3. 69342 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3352 unique users in 18140 transactions
4. 62678 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3666 unique users in 60435 transactions
5. 60552 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4745 unique users in 34669 transactions
6. 54271 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3797 unique users in 37450 transactions
7. 45613 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2932 unique users in 16135 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 39256 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2546 unique users in 14554 transactions
10. 38350 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2965 unique users in 31060 transactions
11. 35980 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1599 unique users in 14227 transactions
12. 33787 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2211 unique users in 11483 transactions
13. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
14. 32890 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1495 unique users in 10466 transactions
15. 29906 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1467 unique users in 7844 transactions
16. 29520 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1742 unique users in 6898 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
20. 23479 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1392 unique users in 9577 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18441 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1795 unique users in 4140 transactions
23. 17077 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 568 unique users in 8031 transactions
24. 16858 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 754 unique users in 6280 transactions
25. 16747 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1758 unique users in 7658 transactions
26. 16579 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1204 unique users in 9425 transactions
27. 16260 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2009 unique users in 6611 transactions
28. 15383 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 647 unique users in 5512 transactions
29. 15191 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1335 unique users in 8539 transactions
30. 14682 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1696 unique users in 7673 transactions
31. 14547 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1112 unique users in 1788 transactions
32. 14442 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3166 unique users in 7575 transactions
33. 13650 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 667 unique users in 3647 transactions
34. 13561 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5936 transactions
35. 13544 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1364 unique users in 7495 transactions
36. 13522 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1157 unique users in 8272 transactions
37. 13434 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6301 transactions
38. 13396 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 854 unique users in 4316 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 12079 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1207 unique users in 6594 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8837 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 589 unique users in 7483 transactions
43. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
44. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
45. 8622 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1065 unique users in 3732 transactions
46. 8585 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 760 unique users in 7418 transactions
47. 8567 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 525 unique users in 6743 transactions
48. 8423 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 333 unique users in 3394 transactions
49. 8262 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 962 unique users in 3603 transactions
50. 8208 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 678 unique users in 2533 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26682. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26683. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26684. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26685. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26686. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26687. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26688. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26689. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26690. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26691. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26692. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26693. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26694. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26695. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26696. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26697. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26698. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26699. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26700. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26701. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26702. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26703. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26705. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26706. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26707. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26708. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26709. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26710. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26711. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26712. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26713. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26714. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26715. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26716. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26717. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26718. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26719. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26720. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26721. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26722. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26723. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26724. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26725. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26726. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26727. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26728. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26729. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26730. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26731. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 341562 (14.39%)
Tuesday 340664 (14.35%)
Wednesday 340360 (14.34%)
Thursday 361100 (15.21%)
Friday 359352 (15.14%)
Saturday 312704 (13.17%)
Sunday 316853 (13.35%)
Total: 2372595
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
44. Post 67045574 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Sat Aug 15 02:27:13 CEST 2026) in Does this also fall under Campaign Manager responsibilities?:
Most of the brands just uses the direct link, or they have a specific referral code to see the conversion rate, but the one who do the latter probably short term ones and conclude too soon that advertising on Bitcointalk is not effective.
The job of a campaign manager is to ensure the quality of the participants and it aligns with the interest of the brand they are promoting but they are not responsible for the conversion rate in my opinion.
Anyone who expects from a signature campaign that they will get a large number of clicks and significantly increase traffic, is seriously mistaken, or maybe they just don't know marketing.
It certainly contributes to some extent, but the biggest benefit is brand building and of course, what bitmover mentions. Although backlinks from bitcointalk are not up to follow, they really have a positive impact on strengthening domain authority
45. Post 67045299 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Sat Aug 15 00:14:19 CEST 2026) in Bitcoin wallet seed phrase with an optional (extended) passphrase:
This hack is a first time ever hardware wallet hack at this scale.
The hardware wallet wasn't hacked
The attacker took advantage of the flaws that created a pattern when generating seedphrase for their wallets.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Use case | | | Recommended length | | | Bits of entropy | | |
| | | Small holdins (<$1k) | | | 5-6 words | | | 55-66 | | |
| | | Medium holdings ($1k - $100k) | | | 6-7 words | | | 66-77 | | |
| | | Large holdings ($100k+) | | | 7-8 words | | | 77-88 | | |
| | | Whale / institutional | | | 8-10 words | | | 88-110 | | |
The entropy you listed are not strong enough especially for institutional level
And the number of words means nothing if they can be easily guessed or linked.
What matter is the amount of true entropy behind them
And whether they can be link to a predictable pattern.
128bits should at least be bare minimum of genuine entropy.
You are right.
The disaster of coldcard happened because the total entropy of seeds was about 40 bits.
A standard 24 words seed with decent entropy should have 128 bits.
There's major exploit already happened on Coldcard due to weak seed generation. Then now they want to repeat that incident and try to create or suggest same thing.
Definitely its good to drop some sample to refresh those people who forget about the exploit happened on that device.
The vulnerability stemmed from a March 2021 firmware issue that weakened seed generation on certain Coldcard models.
Source]
So reading these news make us realize that from start Coldcard RNG is so weak, since start. So that suggestion to have 24 seed word and have 128 bits of entropy is best to make sure our wallet is more secured.
46. Post 67043706 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Fri Aug 14 16:43:37 CEST 2026) in Bitz.io || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $65 Prize Pool 💰:
Winners are,
Winner:
21 - Pandorak
Winner 2:
12 - Road21Bitcoin
Winner 3:
08 - Smartprofit
Verify herePlease DM me your Bitz.io Bitcoin deposit address.
47. Post 67042918 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Fri Aug 14 11:59:50 CEST 2026) in [Userscript]Bitcointalk Modern Theme - Yet another Bitcointalk Skin:
You could say your extensions applies to altcointalks as well. I think it already works in both websites as well.
Other forum have other extension. They are built slightly differerently. I am going to update also the other one, by the way.
On a side note: why is that image Is in Italian? Mine is in English? Are you Italian? 🤌🏻🍕
