Last update: 2026-04-25_Sat_15.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
bitmover receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. bitmover
2. FeeBuddy
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "bitmover" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66654767 (unedited backup) (by non fungible anxiety) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 15:20:37 CEST 2026) in Polymarket é bloqueada no Brasil:
Vai ser igual foi com o Twitter e com os cassinos.. vai todo mundo usar VPN.
Todo mundo deve ser tipo 60% da sua bolha cripto/tecnologia, e menos de 1% da população ne
Tenho certeza que se você der uma voltinha na rodoviária de qualquer capital entrevistando pessoas, deve ser praticamente zero o número de celulares com VPN instalada
Falando nisso, qual você está usando ou vai usar? Alguem recomenda?
Eu tenho usado a protonVPN, mas estou procurando opções tb
Igual quando foi com o twitter, ficou só uma turma de elite. Galera sobrestima o poder de censura do estado.
Eu uso um tal de Eddie VPN, proton eu não confio nem no email, eles peidam muito fácil.
2. Post 66654322 (unedited backup) (by Tungbulu) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 12:10:14 CEST 2026) in Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?:
[edited out]
That’s right. There’s no universal indicator that an investor has accumulated enough or reached an overaccumulation status. Hitting a state of overaccumulation isn’t just about hitting a particular number of BTC. This is because every individual’s financial position is very unique and whatever the term overaccumulation status means to the investor only makes sense in relation to their life and their overall position. Which is their expenses, their income stability, their age, and most times how you plan to use the asset you’re accumulating in the future. It’s very possible for an investor who’s holding 1BTC with a low living cost and a strong cash flow to be in a much better and stronger position than someone who’s already accumulated 3BTC but has no income and a much higher obligation.
Sure. Living within one's means is important, whether a person is still accumulating, or has reached maintenance phase or might start to employ sustainable withdrawal.
And, he may be using his bitcoin to supplement other income sources that he has or he might be planning to completely live off of the BTC... even though objectively, if a guy already is considering himself at sustainable withdrawal then 1 BTC is ONLY going to have a sustainable withdrawal income that is 1/3 of the 3 BTC.
I calculate that
currently 1 BTC will ONLY have a sustainable withdrawal amount of $6k per year or $500 per month, while of course, if 3 BTC is 3x the size then it would have an annual sustainable withdrawal amount of $18k per year or $1,500 per month. Of course, my own calculations allow the annual dollar rate of the sustainable withdrawal amount to be raised by 7% each year, yet if guys have little to no cushion and they are withdrawing the maximum, then it is possible that the formulas might not work out if they don't have any extra cushion. So sometimes monitoring and adjustment might have to take place if guys are trying to withdraw at their maximum sustainable withdrawal rate.
Yeah, when it comes to living off Bitcoin, this is actually a real point that a lot of folks often ignore. There’s quite a big difference between just hodling bitcoin and actually having to depend on your stash for survival.
The part about living within your means is very very crucial for every investor. Whether the investor is in his accumulation phase or already living off his stash, it’s important for their lifestyle to really match the capacity of their Bitcoin stash and not what the actual capacity you feel or wish your BTC would be. I believe your example about the 1 BTC vs 3 BTC clearly explains it perfectly. The difference isn’t just small, it infact changes everything in terms of safety and comfort.
I also think the $500 monthly from 1 BTC you mentioned above is quite honest and realistic. Although for some, this may not be enough to cover for their expenses, in fact it could be more of just support money. So in this situation, the best thing would be to support it with an alternative source of income because relying fully on Bitcoin can be very risky. But with a stash of 3 BTC, there’s a bit more room to withdraw more, and even if it’s not luxury, but it should still be good enough.
Although I don’t really know about the 7% increase part, although it makes sense on paper, but I know that Bitcoin isn’t always steady you know, we do have bad years and good years, some years could be lower and some years higher, so if one attempts to strictly follow that plan, it could cause some complications, like selling low, which of course wouldn’t be all that favourable. That’s why that part, I feel necessary adjustments should be worth considering, as this could potentially be seen as the real backbone of that strategy, not just necessary but very necessary.
In my own personal opinion, I view sustainable withdrawal as less of a fixed formula and more of a kind of dynamic system, although I don’t know, cos I’ve not really reached that stage yet, so I wouldn’t know lol.
In conclusion, I think your framework makes a lot of sense, particularly the part you buttressed on realism, cushioning and most importantly adaptability, because while dealing with an asset as volatile as Bitcoin, surviving in the market isn’t just based on the math holding up, but more about your reaction and response should incase it doesn’t…
3. Post 66653888 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 08:40:07 CEST 2026) in Ainda vale a pena comprar pequenas quantias de BTC hoje?:
Ainda faz sentido comprar pequenas quantias regularmente (tipo DCA), ou hoje só faz diferença investir valores maiores?
Valores maiores, maiores ganhos ou perdas.
Valores menores, menores ganhos ou perdas.
Investir em algo, não depende do seu valor atual, mas sim o valor potencial.
Por isso, mesmo que pouco, investir em BTC é sempre uma oportunidade de bom retorno.
Se o resultado futuro, vai ser igual ao passado? Isso ninguém sabe. Mas, nunca podemos investir a pensar nos ganhos passados. Porque como todo o investidor diz: ganhos passados, não garante ganhos futuros.
Ou seja, se você acredita no Bitcoin, vale sempre apena fazer aquisições, não importa o montante.
O bitcoin não vai mudar o mundo. Vai ser isso aí que é hoje, com algum ganho de adoção. Pode multiplicar por 3x, 4x em 10 anos? Pode... mas igual a NVIDIA? Apostaria que não.
Não vai porque?
Talvez porque a malta ficou presa na ideia de hold, em vez da ideia de utilizar.
O objetivo do Bitcoin era mudar o mundo financeiro, mas a malta preferiu pegar nessa narrativa, para usa-lo no mesmo modelo financeiro tradicional, que era suposto combatelo.
O caso NVIDIA é interessante, em 6-7 anos, eles deram um salto que nem eles estavam a espera. Mas, isso também não significa que irão ficar nesse ritmo para sempre. Até porque mais cedo ou mais tarde, eles irão ter concorrência minimamente eficaz. Poderão continuar a ser os melhores, mas não os únicos capazes (como agora quase são).
4. Post 66653772 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 07:35:43 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-04-17_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1776393246 1 5519917.msg66623686 252510 3753717
1776393157 1 5224503.msg66625250 198573 2003859
1776392470 1 5519917.msg66623676 252510 3600622
1776392289 1 5519917.msg66623388 252510 3529859
1776392053 1 5519917.msg66622304 252510 3700266
1776391795 1 5580483.msg66625254 1634336 3442100
1776391280 1 5580483.msg66625236 3442100 1634336
1776390501 1 5224503.msg66625085 2003859 198573
1776389938 1 5522781.msg64846922 3442100 1000813
1776388874 1 5580401.msg66622311 1711698 2755792
1776386090 1 5580260.msg66624139 33156 2776678
1776386018 4 5580260.msg66623560 33156 3383763
1776385060 2 5565816.msg66413744 3647116 3588053
1776384892 1 5563728.msg66625124 3723796 2737799
1776384808 1 5579477.msg66584995 2776678 3491360
1776384769 2 5574872.msg66420965 2776678 3368141
1776384721 1 5156835.msg51544945 2776678 2423488
1776384675 1 5579358.msg66586668 2819049 3434176
1776384494 2 178336.msg66624044 64507 33156
1776383170 1 5580474.msg66625068 2776678 35
1776382658 2 5580208.msg66614866 3567660 3736035
1776382645 1 5580123.msg66612963 140584 11425
1776382505 1 5450786.msg62175955 1000813 2762272
1776382495 1 5580075.msg66608724 1000813 3753546
1776382485 1 5579022.msg66569314 1000813 3466646
1776382463 1 5579841.msg66598696 1000813 3735576
1776382442 1 5580146.msg66611747 1000813 3442100
1776382423 1 5580337.msg66619609 1000813 745781
1776382394 1 5579969.msg66604176 1000813 3698160
1776382377 1 5579812.msg66597728 1000813 745781
1776382353 1 5580057.msg66608041 1000813 3735576
1776382340 1 5580139.msg66611557 1000813 552276
1776382334 1 178336.msg66624458 252510 64507
1776382325 1 5579534.msg66587176 1000813 3704588
1776382317 1 5580201.msg66616645 557798 846936
1776382314 1 5580201.msg66614694 557798 1174868
1776382309 2 5580201.msg66614212 557798 846936
1776382300 1 5580319.msg66618888 1000813 2762272
1776382287 1 5580430.msg66623088 1000813 3442100
1776382271 1 5580135.msg66611515 1000813 552276
1776381932 1 178336.msg66624044 252510 33156
1776381802 1 5580208.msg66623173 3567660 3542569
1776381761 1 5580208.msg66615889 3567660 3645972
1776381729 1 5580208.msg66615247 3567660 65636
1776381695 1 5530314.msg66623479 938833 831523
1776381581 2 5580206.msg66624112 3567660 3729918
1776381547 2 5580206.msg66622522 3567660 3688462
1776381526 1 5580206.msg66620850 3567660 3725618
1776381361 1 5580299.msg66622303 1827294 753396
1776381307 2 5573344.msg66620178 407174 1626490
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (56 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2453 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:34:06 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
devouring-DARKNESS (
history) for
Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:32:37 AM CEST,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
DireWolfM14 (
history) for
Re: 🏈🏈 The American Football Discussion Thread 🏈🏈.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:21:10 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Bright0515 (
history) for
Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:18:09 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Sim_card (
history) for
Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:14:13 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Loyang (
history) for
Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (588 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8537 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 884 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3753546:
mobilelegend (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3753604:
pixelsort (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3753630:
Anatolii83 (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3753717:
devouring-DARKNESS (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3753854:
wizardotools (
history) earned: 13 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3750739: Aventas
3750779: Bitsolo.me
3750843: crypto-vegas
3751018: 0trace
3751023: BitaniaExchange
3751038: sats2usd
3751069: katzamit99
3751114: Cassius55
3751274: bisasam
3751306: broccolo9
3751426: REAleksij
3751431: fibonacciopstan
3751510: mike.io
3751516: IgnotusNemo
3751609: Kasynoir
3751662: GFOXOG
3751715: Daniel8874
3751788: Nick Finney
3751838: David2026$
3752009: toake
3752048: DeFCoN Network
3752205: Aliciaworld
3752224: Misa Amane
3752237: Niza888
3752313: pscamillo
3752326: asidonline
3752336: Hoke1996
3752446: BitcoinBTGS
3752453: Primark
3752508: John SwapSpace
3752520: BluebloodCXVI
3752555: KycNotList
3752716: jizzjazz
3752795: criptounlocker
3752872: SoloFury
3753044: Cyborg T-33
3753141: tfbets
3753171: CasinoIndex
3753207: Almhissn
3753257: SolvoCard.com
3753281: Adanali
3753372: mirekua
3753444: Criptano
3753482: Qatrol
3753487: tas0000
3753546: mobilelegend
3753604: pixelsort
3753630: Anatolii83
3753717: devouring-DARKNESS
3753854: wizardotools
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8537
4:0:884
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14350:14384
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2557
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:308
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1485
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3750739:0:2
3750779:0:1
3750843:0:2
3751018:0:1
3751023:0:4
3751038:0:2
3751069:0:2
3751114:0:17
3751274:0:3
3751306:0:3
3751426:0:5
3751431:0:1
3751510:0:1
3751516:0:3
3751609:0:1
3751662:0:1
3751715:0:6
3751788:0:2
3751838:0:1
3752009:0:1
3752048:0:5
3752205:0:1
3752224:1:7
3752237:0:4
3752313:0:11
3752326:0:8
3752336:0:1
3752446:0:1
3752453:0:1
3752508:0:2
3752520:0:1
3752555:2:15
3752716:0:1
3752795:0:4
3752872:0:1
3753044:0:1
3753141:0:1
3753171:0:2
3753207:2:4
3753257:0:1
3753281:0:2
3753372:0:1
3753444:0:1
3753482:0:2
3753487:0:1
3753546:0:2
3753604:0:1
3753630:0:2
3753717:0:1
3753854:0:13
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51245Sample 1. 20616 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1109 unique users in 11917 transactions
2. 20302 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 746 unique users in 11143 transactions
3. 18891 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9985 transactions
4. 15353 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 479 unique users in 8839 transactions
5. 14384 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1223 unique users in 5170 transactions
6. 13309 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 716 unique users in 8813 transactions
7. 12222 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 583 unique users in 4642 transactions
8. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
9. 11707 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 491 unique users in 6488 transactions
10. 11290 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6454 transactions
11. 11279 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6560 transactions
12. 11110 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 508 unique users in 5787 transactions
13. 10741 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 581 unique users in 6176 transactions
14. 9997 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 330 unique users in 5141 transactions
15. 9803 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 644 unique users in 5325 transactions
16. 9689 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 338 unique users in 3502 transactions
17. 9678 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 459 unique users in 4834 transactions
18. 9640 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 397 unique users in 3359 transactions
19. 9618 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 531 unique users in 4474 transactions
20. 9590 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 543 unique users in 4326 transactions
21. 9586 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 439 unique users in 5240 transactions
22. 8954 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 538 unique users in 4845 transactions
23. 8645 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 571 unique users in 5099 transactions
24. 8633 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 455 unique users in 5123 transactions
25. 8626 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 404 unique users in 4465 transactions
26. 8537 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 407 unique users in 902 transactions
27. 8534 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4854 transactions
28. 7899 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 457 unique users in 4356 transactions
29. 7571 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4118 transactions
30. 7385 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 585 unique users in 4396 transactions
31. 7143 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 404 unique users in 3648 transactions
32. 7006 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 231 unique users in 1800 transactions
33. 6770 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 198 unique users in 3903 transactions
34. 6738 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 380 unique users in 3407 transactions
35. 6677 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 277 unique users in 3019 transactions
36. 6662 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 390 unique users in 3641 transactions
37. 6651 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 946 unique users in 4317 transactions
38. 6543 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 483 unique users in 3635 transactions
39. 6480 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3736 transactions
40. 6322 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 526 unique users in 3676 transactions
41. 6319 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 625 unique users in 3553 transactions
42. 6316 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 422 unique users in 3684 transactions
43. 6297 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 335 unique users in 2978 transactions
44. 6277 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 416 unique users in 3436 transactions
45. 6195 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3620 transactions
46. 6140 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 458 unique users in 3439 transactions
47. 6057 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 195 unique users in 2634 transactions
48. 6051 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 204 unique users in 3496 transactions
49. 5647 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 388 unique users in 2674 transactions
50. 5596 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 454 unique users in 3937 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51196. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51197. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51198. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51199. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51200. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51201. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51202. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51203. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51204. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51205. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51206. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51207. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51208. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51209. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51210. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51211. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51212. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51213. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51214. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51215. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51216. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51217. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51218. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51219. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51220. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51221. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51222. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51223. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51224. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51225. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51226. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51227. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51228. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51229. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51230. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51231. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51232. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51233. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51234. 1 Merit received by 0trace (#3751018) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51235. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51236. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51237. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51238. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51239. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51240. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51241. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51242. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51243. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51244. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51245. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26607Sample 1. 73568 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 903 unique users in 12746 transactions
2. 68234 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2198 unique users in 29395 transactions
3. 67163 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3328 unique users in 17707 transactions
4. 59662 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3599 unique users in 57453 transactions
5. 58696 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4622 unique users in 33644 transactions
6. 50847 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3697 unique users in 35160 transactions
7. 44330 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2879 unique users in 15677 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38234 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2961 unique users in 31006 transactions
10. 37840 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2522 unique users in 14083 transactions
11. 34652 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1588 unique users in 13938 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 32297 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1477 unique users in 10345 transactions
14. 30717 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2123 unique users in 10760 transactions
15. 29001 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1434 unique users in 7616 transactions
16. 28011 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1686 unique users in 6611 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 23572 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6457 transactions
20. 22991 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1377 unique users in 9491 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 17560 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1732 unique users in 3968 transactions
23. 16323 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 747 unique users in 6047 transactions
24. 16162 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1989 unique users in 6567 transactions
25. 16138 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1729 unique users in 7423 transactions
26. 15893 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 539 unique users in 7477 transactions
27. 15564 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1176 unique users in 9095 transactions
28. 15253 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5485 transactions
29. 14612 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1310 unique users in 8270 transactions
30. 14350 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1105 unique users in 1758 transactions
31. 14127 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1666 unique users in 7376 transactions
32. 13475 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3032 unique users in 7123 transactions
33. 13333 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3612 transactions
34. 13302 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1342 unique users in 7391 transactions
35. 13256 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1305 unique users in 5879 transactions
36. 13140 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1139 unique users in 8021 transactions
37. 13044 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 827 unique users in 6134 transactions
38. 12954 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 831 unique users in 4247 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11451 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1170 unique users in 6310 transactions
41. 10543 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 545 unique users in 3954 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8342 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1046 unique users in 3625 transactions
45. 8292 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 755 unique users in 7249 transactions
46. 8153 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 577 unique users in 7050 transactions
47. 8089 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 329 unique users in 3303 transactions
48. 8014 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 950 unique users in 3508 transactions
49. 7752 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 516 unique users in 6158 transactions
50. 7209 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 521 unique users in 4081 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26558. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26559. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26560. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26561. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26562. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26563. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26564. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26565. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26566. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26567. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26568. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26569. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26570. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26571. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26572. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26573. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26574. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26575. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26576. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26577. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26578. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26579. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26580. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26581. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26582. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26583. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26584. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26585. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26586. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26587. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26588. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26589. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26590. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26591. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26592. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26593. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26594. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26595. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26596. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26597. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26598. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26599. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26600. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26601. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26602. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26603. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26604. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26605. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26606. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26607. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 329937 (14.37%)
Tuesday 328724 (14.32%)
Wednesday 329358 (14.35%)
Thursday 349683 (15.23%)
Friday 347478 (15.14%)
Saturday 303012 (13.20%)
Sunday 306617 (13.36%)
Total: 2294809
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
5. Post 66653363 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 01:48:13 CEST 2026) in Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?:
One question can be how aggressive you are able to invest, and surely guys who invest 5-10% of their income are not going to end up stacking as much bitcoin (relative to their income) as compared with guys who might have had been able to invest 15% to 25% of their income.
Another thing to consider is what you plan to do with your bitcoin stash once you reach the timeline.. are you going to sell all of it, or are you going to try to start to employ some version of sustainable withdrawal? One cycle might not give you enough time to have had stackedf enough bitcoin to get the compounding effects, so it could be problematic to be selling a lot of your bitcoin, even though you were only in bitcoin for one cycle.
You are right, these are some of things many investors tend to overlook. Having a clear target and also a direction in accumulation is very important as how much you invest. It's true that the percentage of income you commit weather it's 5% or even 30% will actually shape your outcome, but the approach and the strategies matters alots. Some investors really invest with clear plans, such as selling thier profits when it get/reach to the certain level, while other invest keep on accumulating bitcoin without a well defined goals and it actually leads to confusion
For example, I knew someone who started investing into bitcoin earlier this year and his plan is to take the profits shortly before his wedding week. As such, I see that as well timed plans or approach.
I doubt that you are getting the right message from me if you believe that merely creating a time target (seemingly less than 4 years) is anything close to a solid investment plan, since preparing the money for a wedding date comes off as gambling to me, unless the wedding might be 6 years or more into the future, and even then it may be problematic to be putting money needed (or wanted) for a wedding into bitcoin... especially if you believe yourself to be an investor rather than a trader or a gambler.
Also some investors just keep accumulating endlessly, sometimes comparing themselves to thers on how much they have accumulated,
You need to be more specific, especially in terms of the "endless" concept, even though I do know some guys who have amporphous goals and also seem to think that they could never have enough bitcoin. yet it seems that maybe they have not really thought through ideas of what they are wanting to achieve.
I frequently bring up the idea of a guy who might have a certain income level and then maybe having a goal to either replace his income level or perhaps alternatively to get to some amount that is reasonably higher than his current income level.. and some levels of multiples above might be more reasonable than aiming for 10x or 100x or some otherwise seemingly unrealistic level... .. but yeah, guys sometimes seem to trap themselves into frameworks in which they seem to "never have enough," which seems a bit self-defeating.. even though maybe they might be able to figure out ways to become more realistic when they might start to get close to what they consider to be an acceptable goal.. and sometimes the goals might become more concrete when they are closer to being attained rather when they are in their earlier stages and still seeming to be more theoretical than practical.
and there’s no competition in bitcoin investment or accumulation,
Some guys cannot help but wanting to compete with others, which might be problematic if they are being unrealistic.
because that will seriously create unnecessary pressures on them. Moreover, it's better no to compete with anyone. Invest what you can afford to lose, stay consistent and focuses on strategy that will fits your personal goals.
Even if a guy sets a goal for himself, he might frame it in terms of a competition with another version of himself.. so it does seem that some guys might need some comparable measurement in order to motivate themselves, even though as you imply, the competition might sometimes be unrealistic or unhealthy.
[edited out]
You may be right to some extent, although it was clearly explained where am heading to about some investors that chose to accumulate endlessly. That aside, But this investors doesn’t only relayed on only bitcoin investment profits, he has many other businesses that usually generate income for his daily financial activities, but for him take step and invest in Bitcoin he has actually invested in valuable asset, so that why it's better to have a plan B as an investor. As he invested for like 3 to 4 years after there's no way he will regret it. Yes I know there's no certainty in market since the bitcoin price can fluctuate at any moment, but within the period of 3 to 4years later of his investment, I have no doubt on how massive his potential profits maybe. Moreover, accumulating bitcoin gradually by using DCA strategy is a great way to approach Bitcoin investment, expecialy for newbies.
He's a trader/gambler, and yeah, maybe it will work out and maybe not. He can do whatever he likes, but I would not consider him to be "investing," and yeah, he can call it what he likes too, but I would disagree, especially with a 3-4 year timeline (even if it might end up working out for the guy).
[edited out]
That’s right. There’s no universal indicator that an investor has accumulated enough or reached an overaccumulation status. Hitting a state of overaccumulation isn’t just about hitting a particular number of BTC. This is because every individual’s financial position is very unique and whatever the term overaccumulation status means to the investor only makes sense in relation to their life and their overall position. Which is their expenses, their income stability, their age, and most times how you plan to use the asset you’re accumulating in the future. It’s very possible for an investor who’s holding 1BTC with a low living cost and a strong cash flow to be in a much better and stronger position than someone who’s already accumulated 3BTC but has no income and a much higher obligation.
Sure. Living within one's means is important, whether a person is still accumulating, or has reached maintenance phase or might start to employ sustainable withdrawal.
And, he may be using his bitcoin to supplement other income sources that he has or he might be planning to completely live off of the BTC... even though objectively, if a guy already is considering himself at sustainable withdrawal then 1 BTC is ONLY going to have a sustainable withdrawal income that is 1/3 of the 3 BTC.
I calculate that
currently 1 BTC will ONLY have a sustainable withdrawal amount of $6k per year or $500 per month, while of course, if 3 BTC is 3x the size then it would have an annual sustainable withdrawal amount of $18k per year or $1,500 per month. Of course, my own calculations allow the annual dollar rate of the sustainable withdrawal amount to be raised by 7% each year, yet if guys have little to no cushion and they are withdrawing the maximum, then it is possible that the formulas might not work out if they don't have any extra cushion. So sometimes monitoring and adjustment might have to take place if guys are trying to withdraw at their maximum sustainable withdrawal rate.
I really love your point about shifting tactics overtime, because this is mostly where a lot of gamble often end up struggling. Theoretically, bitcoin accumulation might feel like it’s a straightforward process, just as simple as keep buying consistently, but as time goes on, the question starts shifting from “How much can I stack?” to “what role does this really play in my life?” If an investor fails to recognize this shift, then they might either just keep on accumulating blindly or they might possibly start second guessing themselves too early.
Even though I am a pretty BIG advocate of get the fuck started investing in bitcoin as soon as possible once recognizing that discretionary funds are available, at the same time, I think that ongoing studying of bitcoin and reviewing investing and cashflow management systems is an important ongoing process, and surely some guys get quite a bit of pleasure out of monitoring their finances and their progress while other guys want to be less formal and less introspective in regards to how they are investing and how they are managing their cashflows... so from my perspective there should be monitoring and possibly adjusting going on no matter the stage, whether in the accumulation stage, the maintenance stage or the sustainable withdrawal stage.
Bitcoin price can be very very uncertain and this uncertainty just reinforces the fact that there are actually no timing mechanisms that can be considered as perfect. It doesn’t really matter whether you’re looking at the 200 week average or spot price,
I think that it matters, and I think that the 200-WMA is the best way to valuate and attempt to help what to do. .at least when it comes to figuring out how close a guy might be to time-based sustainable withdrawal.
Price-based sustainable withdrawal does not rely on the 200-WMA as much (if at all).
So of course, I think it matters, and so far in bitcoin's history, the 200-WMA has ONLY gone up and has tended to be a bottom indicator.. so even if it is not guaranteed, to hold in terms of always going up or being a bottom indicator, it still seems to be a good tool to help in figuring out how to proceed and even to determine if enough bitcoin has been accumulated.
because these are merely just lenses and not necessarily an answer. Their purpose isn’t to define an investor’s entire strategy but to only guide their behaviour, good mechanisms for emotional management but in the long run, it’ll still be up to the investor to make the absolute decisions.
Sure. The investor has to figure out how to use the tools, and if he ends up entering into sustainable withdrawal and withdraws too much too soon because he is misreading (and misusing the tools) then, yeah, he could get himself into trouble by not figuring out how to use the tools correctly so that he does not sell too much too soon.
On the other side, I have seen some guys who have enough BTC to start sustainable withdrawal at their chosen income level, yet they are afraid to start, even though they might already have double the bitcoin for their target income level. So, guys could make the mistake in either direction 1) withdrawing too much too soon or 2) waiting way too long before starting to begin withdrawals.
In my own personal opinion, the only time overaccumulation only actually starts becoming a problem is when it begins to a kind of crowd out other important areas, such as diversification, liquidity, or even your peace of mind.
Well if a guy ONLY has bitcoin and cash, then he may well not be prepared if he has 95% or more in bitcoin and he is not prepared for the price to correct 50% or 75% or more... so yeah, guys could end up getting themselves in trouble if they cannot figure out a comfortable balance. Some of these concerns might not make as much sense if we are not walking through some examples, since guys could have some income sources and they are merely ongoingly building up their bitcoin investment, yet if they lose their income source, then they might have to start to live off of their bitcoin or they might have to try to find another income source, but if they already have accurately assessed their overaccumulation status based on the 200-WMA and they have a sufficient cushion of bitcoin that is beyond their target levels (such as 2x) then I have a hard time understanding how that would be a problem unless the guy is other wise miscalculating his status based on spot price rather than the 200-WMA.
Maybe I need to give an example?
If a guy has a target income from his BTC of $80k per year, and he looks up how many bitcoin that he needs, and he sees
the bare minimum at this moment for that $80k per year income level is 13.3102 BTC, then maybe he might not rest assured until he gets 50% higher than his bare minimum number.. which would be 19.9653 BTC, so if he still has his job, and maybe he is already making somewhere close to $80k per year in his regular job or maybe he is making less than $80k per year, so isn't the devil in the details regarding if the guy loses his job, and I am not sure if he needs to have other resources, as long as he has enough bitcoin. Also, there could be a question of how much above his target level of BTC he had accumulated, and whether he is willing to live off less of an income until the sustainable withdrawal rate goes up? Or maybe you want to say that the guy miscalculated his withdrawal rate in some kind of a way?.. since if he loses his job, he may or may not have a cushion of cash, yet if he has enough BTC, then he does not need any cushion of cash because he has enough or more than enough bitcoin for his targeted withdrawal level
You probably need to clarify what you are wanting to say exactly in terms of any need to diversify, which may not even be necessary if the guy is properly valuating within the context of the 200-WMA instead of making assumptions based on spot prices.
The moment an investor begins to notice that their position in Bitcoin has eventually grown to the point where their financial life starts feeling too dependent on one outcome, then that’s a clear cue that they need to do some reassessment, not necessarily because Bitcoin is bad, but simply because concentration risk is real.
You seem to be overly emphasizing the need to diversify, and you may also be thinking about guys who also don't have any cushion and if they are trying to withdraw from BTC and the quantity of BTC is barely at their required income level. You might need to give an example.
6. Post 66653206 (unedited backup) (by Hispo) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 00:49:43 CEST 2026) in Polymarket.com - Bets on any events (politics, sports, crypto markets, and more):
Just my personal opinion, but it seems to me people within the government and regulation of stocks in Brazil want people to stop using Polymarket and gramble with money on those national websites and platforms, because it means there will be an steady flow of income in the form of fees for both private actors and also the government.
Still, it is rather a pointless block, because Polymarket does not need any thing beyond an address and money in other to be useful for anyone, and anyone within the world of cryptocurrency would have a minimum of idea how to handle and VPN and understand how bypass those blocks put in place by governments.
It won't change a thing, unless Brazil starts to prosecute those who violate the blockage and try to bet on polymarket.
7. Post 66652553 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 21:40:37 CEST 2026) in Polymarket.com - Bets on any events (politics, sports, crypto markets, and more):
a pointless block, like if that is going to stop anyone from accessing polymarket.
but with how countries are blocking stuff left and right, soon VPNs will be on the chopping block.
I like being able to trade on events and being right on things (but that's a post for another day)
easy, just become an insider
or do it like these two guys:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/winning-polymarket-bets-strange-temps-164645591.htmlthe lengths some people go thru to win on polymarket is crazy.
8. Post 66652285 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 20:23:43 CEST 2026) in Polymarket.com - Bets on any events (politics, sports, crypto markets, and more):
.
These blocks are always bullshit, I just use a VPN and impersonate my location to Austria or Hungary or something.
I like being able to trade on events and being right on things (but that's a post for another day)
On the other hand, B3 (Brazil stock exchange) will open its own predictive market tool.
I guess they just want to rug-pull their customers because no way they are going to post trading events, it will just be binary options gambling on stocks.
9. Post 66650297 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 09:56:25 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
If you have 0.05 btc of 30 AML risk, and send those BTC to an address with 0.05 btc of 60 AML risk, it is very reasonable to expect that the final address will have a lower AML score than 60.
This is how mixers and swap exchange are able to clean coins. Coins aren't tainted and marked forever.
Yeah, but what if you send BTC with 25% AML score to the empty address that previously had coins with a >60% AML score? Will the new coins, although relatively clean, inherit a bad score due to the history of the address?
10. Post 66649740 (unedited backup) (by Paredao) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 03:21:25 CEST 2026) in Javier Milei é o novo presidente da Argentina:
O povo vota em massa no milei, o cara arrasando nas eleicoes de meio de mandato
Isso depois da chantagem que o Laranjão fez dizendo que não mandaria o swap cambial caso o Mijei perdesse a eleição. Olha que 20 bilhões de Dólares para um país falido é muita coisa.
11. Post 66649429 (unedited backup) (by Wakate) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 00:41:19 CEST 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
...
I think it is way more common that customers do not read the terms of service than the support service.
Most users never read a term of service (ToS) in their life
and they would certainly avoid most services if they did read those terms.
If every user truly understood the ToS before joining, the number of players could go up or down significantly depending on how comfortable they are with the terms.
This makes it hard to tell whether platforms benefit more from users who fully understand the agreement or from those who never pay attention to it at all.
One thing I have known is that casinos do have a way of updating their TOS so that they don't look too direct when they know that players can use their terms against them in an obvious matter. They do have some restrictions to make it look less severe in most cases so they don't get handcuffed. It is the obligation of players to check the TOS of a casino before ever using any of them.
12. Post 66647446 (unedited backup) (by FP91G) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 14:55:25 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
I think the AML score already considers the history of the coins, many past transactions
You can try to move a coin with high aml score to 2-3 different addresses, it won't solve. I never tried more than that, but I think it will only reduce the score if you add more coins to the same address and consolidate them.
When we test the AML score of a service, we always use a new address to make the results as accurate as possible. Has anyone done a similar analysis of coins from the same source sent to addresses with different AML scores?
What is the difference if it is at an address that was previously 'dirty' compared to a new, clean address?
After such a transaction with dirty bitcoins, both addresses will have an increased AML risk, and transfers from them to the crypto exchange may be blocked.
I don't understand the point of this comparison if the decision to block is made by a centralized URI exchange.
13. Post 66645947 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 02:03:20 CEST 2026) in Como enviar Bitcoin com taxas 5 vezes mais baratas:
Mas o bitcoin não funciona assim, você não paga uma taxa percentual do valor transferido. Voce paga por UTXO transferido.
Sim sim, eu fui infeliz na comparação, só usei a mesma analogia considerando que para esse exemplo eu tenho 1 UTXO por semana e também com valor fixo, mas eu entendi.
E não é pq você ganhou muito que você deve desperdiçar seu dinheiro. Pessoalmente, acho 1% muito quando falamos de dinheiro, independente da quantia. Como exemplo, basta ver o pessoal que administra fundos na faria lima: são todo milionarios, e cobram 2% de taxa de adm.
Certo, concordo que em quantias maiores o lucro é definido nos detalhes... quanto maior o valor menor a taxa, faz sentido.
Mas, da mesma forma quando você vai em um restaurante, você é das pessoas que se negam à pagar os 10% pra "caixinha" dos garçom? 10% é um roubo ou é algo justo?
Enfim, quando falamos de grana todos temos percepções diferentes, eu to confortável com 1% até mesmo quando penso na redução da recompensa/bloco minerado e em uma forma de manter a rede saudável e segura.
14. Post 66645704 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 00:26:01 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
I think the AML score already considers the history of the coins, many past transactions
You can try to move a coin with high aml score to 2-3 different addresses, it won't solve. I never tried more than that, but I think it will only reduce the score if you add more coins to the same address and consolidate them.
When we test the AML score of a service, we always use a new address to make the results as accurate as possible. Has anyone done a similar analysis of coins from the same source sent to addresses with different AML scores?
What is the difference if it is at an address that was previously 'dirty' compared to a new, clean address?
15. Post 66645488 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 23:05:55 CEST 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Probably the whole first year of bitcoin, there were probably less than 20 individuals in total mining bitcoin and on CPUs. .not GPUs or anything fancy.. I think Lazlo figured out the GPU thing in early 2010.. which was part of the reason he started to buy pizzas in around May 2010 with all of the bitcoin he was mining as compared with any other then existing miners at that time (before bitcoin even seemed to have any kind of a price).
[edited out]
@infofront, make a poll please OGnasty or PAASHAAS
Would be nice to see who people following the most in a way of thinking for a near-mid term period.
Maybe a 3th option not to agree with any of them.
In your rendition of the world, as we know it, will there be an "OgNasty is retarded" option?
By the way, remember the good ole days when many of us (if not all?) "used to be" pissed off at Paashaas, based on his ongoing, incessant and persistent bear calls - which likely related to his having had sold too much of dee cornz too soon in the mid $30ks..
hahahahahaha
My how times change, no?
[edited out]
As long as we having fun together not interested in one upsmanship or a dick swinging competition.
You are no fun!!!!!!!
[edited out]
well for me with a measly 1.73 coins pushing to grow to 2 coins
which one should I pick to believe.
Hint it is not OG
here's why I am 69 and 1.73x40k=69.2 K
while 1.73x1,000,000=1,730,000
I rather get the 1.7 million plus easy pick for me.
As that is a life changing number for me. Even if I pay 600k in taxes on it.
In theory, you could stack more coins with the OG fantasy view.
Oh, and by the way, it is a bit presumption to expect high levels of BTC price performance, merely because we had high levels of BTC performance in the past.
Accordingly, it seems way more practical for guys to be preparing for a variety of scenarios, whether we are still accumulating more coins or not... .and yeah, there can frequently be a lack of patience to want to get to a stage of spending coins rather than accumulating them.. which is not as BIG of a problem for guys who have already gotten towards a decently large bitcoin stash and perhaps even to overaccumulation status where they have enough or more than enough bitcoin.
Even lower quantity of coins can be transitioned into sustainable withdrawal without trying to fuck around with trading, once we might figure out that we are no longer in our bitcoin accumulation phase - even though
right now, from my point of view, 1.73 BTC only gets you a sustainable withdrawal amount of right around $10,400 per year or $865 per month with a 7% per year increase, which still is not really bad for some people to have such a supplement of sustainable income - until such stage that there might be a determination to start to deplete the principle (which then is no longer sustainable withdrawal).
[edited out]
Hackability
destroys immutability, what part of that do you not understand
Sure. Hacking coins is theft, yet changing property rights within the bitcoin code seems way more problematic than someone taking some keys that might have had been vulnerable (supposedly).
I think that I fixed the quote that you (OOM) had messed up. I was going to send you a merit OOM, but you misquoted.
I think that the quote should have had been like this:
~Difficult choices and that's why we all need to decide were we stand and hash it out now years before it becomes imperative.
A decade from now what will a coin be worth?
Those coins going liquid will tank the value now, imagine when the value it upwards of a cool mil.
It does not matter what the valuation will be at a given point of time,
BTCitcoin is created to be an
immutable asset and it should stay that way irrespective of what the economist think.
Seconded. If you ever worry about the (monetary) worth of Bitcoin, you didn't get the idea of it. Just because Satoshi advised to hodl Bitcoin and that it will go up in price by itself (yeah, i did put it quite simple here but i think you get what i mean), doesn't mean that this is the sole purpose of Bitcoin. It's just a (convenient) side-effect of a deflational asset.
Thinking of Bitcoin as a technology instead of an asset brought me through all those cycle bear markets without sweating. Sure, it's nice to zoom out and see my net worth going up only, but fiat richness is really not the meaning of (my) life.
Substantively, I think that you (OOM) are agreeing that bitcoin's asset properties should not be changed.
16. Post 66645374 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 22:33:49 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
You can try to move a coin with high aml score to 2-3 different addresses, it won't solve. I never tried more than that, but I think it will only reduce the score if you add more coins to the same address and consolidate them.
Yes, the AML score will get lower if you add clean coins to the same address. Lets say someone has $100 worth of coins that have aml score of 50 and if in the same wallet $1000 worth of coins with 0-5 AML score are added the both the coins with high AML and with low AML will be in same wallet. One might needed to move all the coins to another wallet for extra safety and then to exchanges. That way I guess there won't be any issues from exchange's end.
17. Post 66645175 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 21:25:13 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
Sometimes I have to receive random tokens, like BNB or pegged BTC in BNB chain, or USDT in solana chain or whatever... there are so many tokens and blockchains around. Metamask supports basically anything. You can also connect it to a hardware wallet. It is a good software...
I use Trezor Suite when dealing with Eth and USDt/USDC because of ether.fi (crypto card). The Trezor Suite has great integration with wallet connect, which makes me question the need to use MetaMask.
I'm not saying that MetaMask is disposable, maybe for those who use many altcoins besides Eth, it can be indispensable.
18. Post 66644413 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 17:28:50 CEST 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
If the casino makes a giveaway, and after the user make the wagering requirements, the casino must allow them to withdrawal... otherwise they will ruin their reputation.
I wasn't able to withdrawal my winnings yet because I lack some dollars for the minimum amount allowed to withdrawal. But I will get there
I understand.
However, I believe you have seen casinos that offer deals that sound too good to be true, only to not honour the bonus winnings. I know there are players who are running after bonuses and probably abusing casino promo codes. However, casinos often do not pay out winnings if they were generated from bonuses rather than deposits. So, I think I should appreciate the casino seeing they are giving away free money even if it is for the promotion purposes.
19. Post 66642962 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 08:30:32 CEST 2026) in O fim do DeFi está próximo?:
Acho que essas coisas acabam de alguma forma fortalecendo o bitcoin, e seu posicionamento como commodity e reserva de valor.
Acabar acho que não, mas que vai enfraquecer isso sim, uma pena, um protocolo tão forte e resiliente passar por isso.. ai chegamos no ponto crucial, de empresas bloqueando carteiras etc etc... o que vai totalmente contra os principios cripto, que é "ser seu proprio banco"... bem, eu meio que perdi bastante da fé em altcoins depois deste ultimo ciclo, que no proximo não terei absolutamente nada dessas moedas...
Enquanto as pessoas não perceberem, que a grande vantagem de se ter/usar cripto é controlar o seu próprio capital e não depender de terceiros para fazer o que quiser, vão continuar expostas a este tipo de situações.
Apesar de alguns dentro do Bitcoin, andarem a tentar desestabilizar, o Bitcoin continua a provar ser o mais eficaz para aquilo a que se propôs desde o primeiro dia. Ser um ativo, controlado pelos seus titulares.
20. Post 66642759 (unedited backup) (by mikel_012) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 06:18:07 CEST 2026) in Como enviar Bitcoin com taxas 5 vezes mais baratas:
A diferença de 1 pra 3 sat/vB é enorme se voce transfere muitos utxo.
Faça uma conta simples.
O ano tem 52 semanas. Se voce participar dos 2 fóruns e ganhar 1 sorteio/review por mes, sao 52+52+12 utxo, o que sao 116 utxo por ano.
Em 2 anos sao 230 utxo.
Imagina consolidar isso. Vamos supor que voce queira vender tudo de uma vez no proximo ATH de 150k usd:
1 sat/vB = 0.13 usd × 230 = 30 usd.
3 sat/vB = 0.3 usd x 230 = 70 usd
A 0.1 sat/vB cai para 3 usd.
A 30 sat v/B sobe para 700 usd.
Nao parece mendigar sats agora né.
Certo, mas falando em números absolutos sempre parece exagerado, da mesma forma como 1 dólar pode pagar uma marmita em muito lugar do mundo, em outros não paga nem um cafezinho preto. Então, vamos falar de números relativos? nesse caso ao mesmo valor do que você se refereiu (campanhas de assinatura).
no bitcointalk 52 * $100/semana = $ 5200, não sei como está os pagamentos no altcoinstalks, mas vamos por 50% do valor... adiciona então $2600... $7800 no total
a taxa de $70 que você calculou com 3sat/vbytes que ue comentei anteriormente é menos de 1% dos $7800 ganhos em um ano, isso pra mim é mendigar sim!
Até o padre diz nas missas que devemos dar 10% de dízimo
Claro que eu exagerei, não uso 3 sat/vbytes fixo, quando vejo que 1,5 é o suficiente para confirmação no próximo bloco eu boto isso, mas também nunca coloquei menos de 1.
Confesso que na verdade nunca senti o peso de tantos utxo, eu consumo retirar a grana das campanhas no máximo 1 vez por mês e ir consolidando elas também.
Eu não sei vocês mas mesmo recebendo $75 por semana eu não quero pagar isso pra movimentar meu bitcoin. Ainda é uma semana de pagamento e para o Brasil é muuuito dinheiro
Todas as vezes eu usava as taxas mais baixas possíveis mas usaria essa tecnica para economizar se juntasse por um ano
21. Post 66642593 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 03:37:25 CEST 2026) in Midnight airdrop:
Pessoal, fui fazer o claim agora dos meus NIGHT e vi que estou sem ADA para fazer o claim
Alguem sabe qual corretora sem KYC da pra usar? tanto para vender os NIGHT quanto para comprar ADA com USDT ou SOL ou BNB?
Não conheço, só ouvi falar, mas tenta a
AceChange
22. Post 66642591 (unedited backup) (by alegotardo) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 03:31:13 CEST 2026) in Como enviar Bitcoin com taxas 5 vezes mais baratas:
A diferença de 1 pra 3 sat/vB é enorme se voce transfere muitos utxo.
Faça uma conta simples.
O ano tem 52 semanas. Se voce participar dos 2 fóruns e ganhar 1 sorteio/review por mes, sao 52+52+12 utxo, o que sao 116 utxo por ano.
Em 2 anos sao 230 utxo.
Imagina consolidar isso. Vamos supor que voce queira vender tudo de uma vez no proximo ATH de 150k usd:
1 sat/vB = 0.13 usd × 230 = 30 usd.
3 sat/vB = 0.3 usd x 230 = 70 usd
A 0.1 sat/vB cai para 3 usd.
A 30 sat v/B sobe para 700 usd.
Nao parece mendigar sats agora né.
Certo, mas falando em números absolutos sempre parece exagerado, da mesma forma como 1 dólar pode pagar uma marmita em muito lugar do mundo, em outros não paga nem um cafezinho preto. Então, vamos falar de números relativos? nesse caso ao mesmo valor do que você se refereiu (campanhas de assinatura).
no bitcointalk 52 * $100/semana = $ 5200, não sei como está os pagamentos no altcoinstalks, mas vamos por 50% do valor... adiciona então $2600... $7800 no total
a taxa de $70 que você calculou com 3sat/vbytes que ue comentei anteriormente é menos de 1% dos $7800 ganhos em um ano, isso pra mim é mendigar sim!
Até o padre diz nas missas que devemos dar 10% de dízimo
Claro que eu exagerei, não uso 3 sat/vbytes fixo, quando vejo que 1,5 é o suficiente para confirmação no próximo bloco eu boto isso, mas também nunca coloquei menos de 1.
Confesso que na verdade nunca senti o peso de tantos utxo, eu consumo retirar a grana das campanhas no máximo 1 vez por mês e ir consolidando elas também.
23. Post 66642182 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 23:23:13 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quite by chance, I sold at $3600+ at the end of 2024. It turned out to be one of the better decisions, although I did not plan to sell, more because of the cash out, and ETH seemed the most uninteresting to me.
You was really lucky and it was a good decision. Buying ETH at that range was a mistake for me, but I managed my average price so I think I am good haha as I just have to wait now for the next bull season.
I sold about half of my position at 3500 and converted a smaller amount to btc.
I regret not selling all the eth stash, but I still had some hope.
I am still holding now some eth. I am waiting for a good opportunity to sell more or converted to btc.
I think ccecash is the cheapest exchange I have found for such trade eth > btc, I having been making some simulations recently
I also sold some of my ETH around $3000 and bought again way lower so I am not facing a huge loss here. I don't regret it, you should also not regret because bro, it is ETH, and it will recover eventually due to its high demand, the way Bitmine is accumulating it, I am 90% confident that this time we will see a new ATH. Do you think?
BTC is best though, you did great to convert it to BTC, yep you are right, the rates are way lower than many.
24. Post 66641556 (unedited backup) (by Mr Reporter) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 20:29:55 CEST 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
...
I think it is way more common that customers do not read the terms of service than the support service.
Most users never read a term of service (ToS) in their life
and they would certainly avoid most services if they did read those terms.
If every user truly understood the ToS before joining, the number of players could go up or down significantly depending on how comfortable they are with the terms.
This makes it hard to tell whether platforms benefit more from users who fully understand the agreement or from those who never pay attention to it at all.
from the start i was trying to understand the uncomfortable truth of most mass and most market, ad supported, or data driven platforms quietly benefit from uninformed_agreement. If TikTok, Meta, or a gacha game made every user read every clause, they’d lose millions. Their model depends on broad permissions that most people wouldn’t grant if they stopped to think.
25. Post 66640910 (unedited backup) (by eaLiTy) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 17:43:55 CEST 2026) in Scammers trying to defraud shipping firms in the Strait of Hormuz:
~
It is very hard to believe that a ship carrying billions of dollars of oil (and ship itself might be worth hundreds of millions) would fall in such scheme.
They have insurance and lots of other stuff which will make impossible to even try to cross the strait without warranties
The story has some validity, Indian tanker named Sanmar Herald might be the scam victim, they might not announce that publicly for the reasons you mentioned regarding legal and insurance reasons.
Tanker Trackers who is a maritime intelligence firm released an audio clip of communication between the said ship and the Iranian Navy and that is how the scam news got leaked.
26. Post 66640614 (unedited backup) (by mitchr4) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 16:12:37 CEST 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
...
I think it is way more common that customers do not read the terms of service than the support service.
Most users never read a term of service (ToS) in their life
and they would certainly avoid most services if they did read those terms.
If every user truly understood the ToS before joining, the number of players could go up or down significantly depending on how comfortable they are with the terms.
This makes it hard to tell whether platforms benefit more from users who fully understand the agreement or from those who never pay attention to it at all.
27. Post 66640587 (unedited backup) (by maydna) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 16:00:31 CEST 2026) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
Anyway, I guess what happened is that freebitco.in's operators made huge money along the years, especially once the bull run of 2024 took place. As early adopters, they were already millionaire or billionaire at that point. Then, they just lost interest to continue managing the platform.
Probably.
This happened to many services... I think the same happened to yolodice, as they shut down their operations in 2021 in a bull run as well
I don't think this is going to happen again to services who started after 2020. Bitcoin volatility is much smaller now.
But the different is Yolodice shut down their operations with announcing to their ANN and gives members time to withdraw all of their funds. Ethan helps members with that so members can taking all of their money including their investment inside Yolodice.
28. Post 66640149 (unedited backup) (by rdluffy) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 13:17:07 CEST 2026) in considering a trezor: should i switch from metamask?:
...
I bought Trezor Plus 3 during one of their sales at the beginning of the year, and price wasn't that much cheaper than it is now (iirc I paid 47 euro and now price is 59) so I am not sure that saving 10-15 euro (as I don't think price will go much lower than 47 euro that i paid) is worth waiting for if you don't own any hardware wallet at all.
That was a good deal
I'm not really sure if it will make the difference the OP needs, but sometimes it can even get you a bigger discount
Black Friday is still a ways off, but it’s a great time to buy hardware wallets
Yeah, I agree.
The most expensive wallet is the one that put your coins at risk
If you are holding thousands, or even tens of thousands of dollars , I suggest getting one as soon as possible
I think when a person already has ~$1000 in crypto, it's worth investing and Trezor is an excellent choice to start with open source, plug-and-play and self-intuitive. Another alternative is the Bitbox02 Nova.
It's better to spend $50 to $100 (or pay more for a HW plus) than to lose everything. It's ideal to save up and buy a second device for backup, it can even be from another brand, as long as it's open source.
I think almost the same, I usually put it this way:
For amounts up to $100, you can use an exchange, a hot wallet, etc
For amounts between $100 and $1,000, learn how to create a secure offline seed phrase
For amounts over $1,000, buy a hardware wallet
Something like that
29. Post 66639041 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 01:41:31 CEST 2026) in considering a trezor: should i switch from metamask?:
The most expensive wallet is the one that put your coins at risk
If you are holding thousands, or even tens of thousands of dollars , I suggest getting one as soon as possible
I think when a person already has ~$1000 in crypto, it's worth investing and Trezor is an excellent choice to start with open source, plug-and-play and self-intuitive. Another alternative is the Bitbox02 Nova.
It's better to spend $50 to $100 (or pay more for a HW plus) than to lose everything. It's ideal to save up and buy a second device for backup, it can even be from another brand, as long as it's open source.
30. Post 66638418 (unedited backup) (by MANGO_PEOPLE) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 21:47:55 CEST 2026) in Is there any dedicated section for the developers?:
I can create projects from Scratch!
Create SaaS products, Casinos, Exchanges, Custodial Mixers, etc.
Thanks!
I think you are searching a board to utilise your skills that means you are trying to produce services. For the you can use different marketplace like Fiver, Upwork , Freelancer and many more trusted websites in the internet. Just go there and find your suitable one. Anyway here is also a board which is called Services. Hope you got your answer and you can lock this thread to prevent unnecessary replies.
31. Post 66638322 (unedited backup) (by Cricktor) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 21:32:37 CEST 2026) in 2.62x BTC dumped to legacy address of Genesis block:
In between quite a lot of dust spam sent to Genesis block recently, somebody was "generous" enough to trigger a new entry to the table.
Past March 14
th, 2025 large
equal/over 500k sats transfers to Genesis block descriptor:
Current balance at time of this post according to
combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50
BTC of coinbase tx: 107.18864064
BTC (includes 9190sat pending confirmation, the difference (0.01670830
BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).
This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptorsee below accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt
32. Post 66637951 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 19:41:44 CEST 2026) in O fim do DeFi está próximo?:
Tem uma demanda global por conversões de moedas sem kyc, como ccecash, bqexch, hyperliquid e todas as dex
Mesmo que ocorra um colapso total das atuais, novas irão surgir no lugar dessas.
Muito vazamento de dados, muito imposto... e cripto permite transações com mais privacidade e que nao podem ser censuradas. Acho que é um caminho sem volta
Mas esses hacks também estão em uma quantidade absurda.. e cada vez mais sofisticados (@joker_josue, adivinha em quem colocaram a culpa desse ataque? nos hackers norte-coreanos de novo
)
Uma coisa é você fazer um swap e ficar exposto por 5 minutos ao protocolo.. outra coisa é essa galera deixar milhões ali travados rendendo "5% ao ano".. será que vale o risco? talvez essa é a pergunta que estão se fazendo agora, o que explica esse TVL despencando.
33. Post 66637846 (unedited backup) (by Casino Critique) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 19:11:25 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet FREE raffle round #3 | Prize pool $200, 10 winners:
SLOTS
1 -
2 - Woodie
3 -
4 - Woodie
5 - RTX-G53
6 -
7 - CONVOAI
8 - Ventazz
9 - Hello5
10 -
11 - Lovelygoldinall
12 -
13 - knuckey
14 - Pmalek
15 - Protonvive
16 - Mr. Magkaisa
17 - Yoona_As
18 - LNC999
19 - Qjmak333
20 -
21 - Pandorak
22 -
23 - tvplus006
24 - malcovi2
25 - LokhcfyBit
26 -
27 - odunybiz
28 - malcovi2
29 -
30 -
31 - ASK Day
32 - f150
33 - Antdm
34 - Zangi777
35 - bitmover
36 - VashaUdacha777
37 - Joy- maker
38 -
39 - masulum
40 - bitzizzix
41 - Danydee
42 - HarvestOpan
43 - HausaBitCkk
44 - vanesha
45 - Ksmertz
46 - Hypnotizer
47 - Leahized
48 -
49 -
50 - masulum
51 -
52 -
53 -
54 -
55 -
56 -
57 -
58 -
59 -
60 - B-BossMan
61 -
62 -
63 -
64 -
65 -
66 - Odenleva09
67 -
68 -
69 -
70 -
71 -
72 - Takiya24
73 -
74 - Ricardo11
75 - Kadelvibess
76 -
77 - WhattheFk
78 -
79 -
80 -
81 -
82 -
83 -
84 -
85 -
86 -
87 - sokani
88 - inearth
89 -
90 - Princexmary
91 - Ninja Primes
92 -
93 -
94 -
95 -
96 -
97 -
98 -
99 -
100 -
34. Post 66637548 (unedited backup) (by icopress) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 17:49:43 CEST 2026) in 🔸 SageSwap.io - Fast Crypto Swap | Sig Campaign [OPEN]:
Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 10 week are on their way.
[Exchange rate: 75,650] 
bitmover, your bonus has been sent!
35. Post 66637169 (unedited backup) (by inspace) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 15:55:43 CEST 2026) in 🔸 SageSwap 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 $30 in BTC:
🔸 Target block - 945933 🔸
This round’s prize goes to bitmover 🎁 Congratulations!
36. Post 66636648 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 13:17:31 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I think ccecash is the cheapest exchange I have found for such trade eth > btc, I having been making some simulations recently
It is true that their fees are the cheapest and the exchange takes place as soon as the necessary confirmations are obtained, they only need to remove the human verification or modify its settings (last time it took me several minutes)
I don't think it makes much of a difference whether an exchange charges a 0.4% or 0.6% fee. The crucial thing is that the exchange rate is the closest to the current market rate. Every time I used CCE.Cash, the rate was the same as for example, on Binance, with the fact that there is no withdrawal fee here.
Proof that instant exchange doesn't have to be more 'unfavorable' than major CEX, and that's the direction we've been waiting for a long time.
37. Post 66636046 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 09:24:37 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I think ccecash is the cheapest exchange I have found for such trade eth > btc, I having been making some simulations recently
It is true that their fees are the cheapest and the exchange takes place as soon as the necessary confirmations are obtained, they only need to remove the human verification or modify its settings (last time it took me several minutes)
38. Post 66634725 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 22:11:55 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
It is interesting that the fee reduced and the transactions are still going up.
Look what I found in etherscan
It is quite impressive that the fees are low, transactions in ATH and the price didn't react a lot. Ethereum is still performing poorly compared to other coins and bitcoin
I think it has to do with their new updates, and I think there are some more updates on the way that they will integrate in 2026. The purpose of these updates will be to decrease the fee even further. Although for some, the fee would still be high, haha, and thanks for sharing the chart. It shows how the demand for ETH is increasing ecosystem-wise.
The price is doing much better, I think. It failed to hit the targets that most of us predicted, but I still have hopes for it, haha, as I bought some near $3500, haha. Is there anyone else who bought in this range?
39. Post 66634716 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 22:09:19 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
I do t know if metamask was "lucky " but reporting it correctly or if they have some good algorithm that catch a high probability of scam
isn't the blacklist built based on users reports? i don't think metamask goes around the internet scanning for scam sites, or do they?
I dont think it is based solely on user reports. There must be some kind of work on their side as well. Maybe some algorithm that track potential phising and scam website. Maybe even some shared list between other services.
As far as I know, it is always based on the user's reports. It is much more difficult to be removed from the blacklist if there is an open scam accusation along with the report.
That is why it may happen that some obvious phishing sites are not blacklisted, and that is only because no one has reported them.
Considering that no one from the splash.tf team is responding to this issue here, and they were quite active until April 5th, I don't know if we should be worried.
40. Post 66633582 (unedited backup) (by Casino Critique) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 16:32:38 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet FREE raffle round #3 | Prize pool $200, 10 winners:
Welcome to Vega Bet $200 weekly prize pool exclusively for Bitcointalk members!
The prizes are evenly split with 10 winners receiving $20 each .
RULES
- Pick a SLOT you like. Last date to make your pick: Saturday 23:59 UTC
- You can pick a 2ND ADDITIONAL SLOT if you contributed with a constructive comments in the Vega Bet ANN topic WITHIN 5 DAYS BEFORE THIS RAFFLE ANNOUNCEMENT.
(In this case make sure you add comment link with your entry) - You can pick a 3RD ADDITIONAL SLOT if you have a Vega Bet account which had at least $100 successful deposit. Don't have an account yet? Click here and register.
- Deposit must not be more than 3 days old from the date you entered in this raffle
- Taking three slots WITHOUT a Vega Bet minimum deposit will disqualify your winning
- We will find the winners using Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
- Any questions? Ask on my Telegram group
- My decisions are final, you must follow the Vega Bet Terms
- You will receive reward in your Vega Bet BTC account
SLOTS
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14 -
15 -
16 -
17 -
18 -
19 -
20 -
21 -
22 -
23 -
24 -
25 -
26 -
27 -
28 -
29 -
30 -
31 -
32 -
33 -
34 -
35 -
36 -
37 -
38 -
39 -
40 -
41 -
42 -
43 -
44 -
45 -
46 -
47 -
48 -
49 -
50 -
51 -
52 -
53 -
54 -
55 -
56 -
57 -
58 -
59 -
60 -
61 -
62 -
63 -
64 -
65 -
66 -
67 -
68 -
69 -
70 -
71 -
72 -
73 -
74 -
75 -
76 -
77 -
78 -
79 -
80 -
81 -
82 -
83 -
84 -
85 -
86 -
87 -
88 -
89 -
90 -
91 -
92 -
93 -
94 -
95 -
96 -
97 -
98 -
99 -
100 -
ENTER
Slot Number:
Vega Player ID:
R7 Promotions General Disclaimer: We would like to make it clear that R7 Promotions 💹📈 Bitcointalk Campaign Management 💪🔥 Signature & Bounty, managed by Bitcointalk member AB de Royse777, is an independent entity and is not directly affiliated with any of the crypto startups we advertise. While we strive to promote these startups in the best possible light, our views and opinions expressed in our advertising materials do not necessarily reflect those of the startups themselves. We work with various clients across the crypto industry, and our goal is to provide high-quality advertising services to help them achieve their marketing objectives.
41. Post 66633535 (unedited backup) (by Casino Critique) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 16:15:49 CEST 2026) in Vega Bet FREE raffle round #2 | Prize pool $200, 10 winners:
Thanks again everyone for joining this free raffle sponsored by
Vega Bet. We will go with the block number 945,790.
Good luck.
We have our winners for Vega Bet free raffle round 2. Please check below for winner list.
Winner: 66 -
Winner 2: 25 - Qjmak333
Winner 3: 16 - Mr. Magkaisa
Winner 4: 62 -
Winner 5: 8 - Itz-prisigold
Winner 6: 79 - Pmalek
Winner 7: 15 - InGod
Winner 8: 18 - Obim34
Winner 9: 19 - Road21Bitcoin
Winner 10: 23 - ASK Day
VerifyWe have 8 winners in this week's round. Rewards will be credited in 2 to 3 days. Stay in touch for the next round.
42. Post 66630754 (unedited backup) (by PERtua) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 18:30:08 CEST 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
Impressive, one of the ways we can get used to a casino and also get the best they are offering through their promotions is by engaging in some of these contest, because it sounds an opportunity to gambling, while we still stand in the best position to earn through the process, I think now I'm also going to put more eye on this aspect and ensure that I grab my own luck these days.
Congrats to you.
Keep an eye open for contests and giveaway is certainly a way to increase holdings in the casino. It can help you play more and even make riskier bets, as the money was initially free of charge.
I made a few bucks already from giveaway money
This is interesting, an opportunity for someone to lay hold to gambling opportunity even when we expect using a particular gambling casino, this is why many of them do not joke with the kind of promotion the engaged when it comes to offers the provided for gamblers through contest and other varieties of bonuses they give, as both the gamblers and the casino all benefited from this line of engagement offers.
Will definitely keep an eye.
The two of you are not unfounded in their arguments. though because contests and giveaways can be an excellent way to get to know a casino and be able to play longer without having to risk too much of your own money. They certainly bring excitement and sometimes can result in small wins as discussed. But be careful. as free money may tempt you to bet bigger than normal. Promotions may come in handy but they can only be effective when you know the conditions and do not count on them as a primary tool. Ultimately they are a pleasant added value. rather than a sure way of a steady stream of money.
43. Post 66630655 (unedited backup) (by Nathrixxx) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 17:56:43 CEST 2026) in 👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑:
Impressive, one of the ways we can get used to a casino and also get the best they are offering through their promotions is by engaging in some of these contest, because it sounds an opportunity to gambling, while we still stand in the best position to earn through the process, I think now I'm also going to put more eye on this aspect and ensure that I grab my own luck these days.
Congrats to you.
Keep an eye open for contests and giveaway is certainly a way to increase holdings in the casino. It can help you play more and even make riskier bets, as the money was initially free of charge.
I made a few bucks already from giveaway money
This is interesting, an opportunity for someone to lay hold to gambling opportunity even when we expect using a particular gambling casino, this is why many of them do not joke with the kind of promotion the engaged when it comes to offers the provided for gamblers through contest and other varieties of bonuses they give, as both the gamblers and the casino all benefited from this line of engagement offers.
