So it's very likely that an issue with withdrawal with fund from SATS tournaments, as you are the first one reporting this issue so far. Otherwise, with normal withdrawal with fund not from SATS tournament, nobody have ever reported problems with their withdrawal practice without a box for withdrawal address, and their accounts were not logged out then unable to log in again.

So sorry about this. I haven't seen anyone complaining about withdrawals. It could be a little problem from your end, browser side. But let's wait for the Biz team to attend to it.

Alert everyone, SATS whale want to make a huge withdrawal, the market is crashing any moment. 

Withdrawals usually go smoothly without any issues. Are there any other issues that could be causing the difficulty?

While I been playing slots at Bitz, I haven't encountered any withdrawal issues, But I was surprised when you couldn't withdraw and suddenly logged out of your Account and had to log back in.

I think you should wait for a response from a Bitz representative for a more precise answer. Hopefully, You can withdraw and enjoy your winnings.

Um, what? That couldn't possibly have anything to do with the PoW architecture, that's for sure. And given that Bitcoin is now a mainstream investment just like the rest, it makes even less sense now.


Can you, um, clarify that? I don't understand what you are trying to say here.


The people who have actual control of the Bitcoin code base is the Bitcoin core development team--although anybody could fork them if they wanted. While I could probably include the two US companies who currently execute the majority of the hash rate in my small list of companies who'd have to agree to the change. I would imagine those companies would go where the money is though.

Regardless, my point that Bitcoin isn't defacto decentralized anymore still stands. A small group of companies/individuals could agree to change it however they want, and the US government could compel them to agree to any change as well.

That's unusual. I have not withdraw USDT before because I haven't been lucky to win anything on the casinos yet, I only deposited a few times but wasn't lucky to win and make withdrawals but I haven't noticed any delay or issues with the withdrawals so maybe something is wrong somewhere, maybe it's a technical issue or something. I'm sure they'll get it fixed soon so let's just wait for OP to address this issue and rectify everything.

What happens in altcointalk, says in altcoinstalk.
I would rather prefer to speak about what we are doing here.
Maybe, if I have time, I will do something also on the other forum, but bitcointalk is the main part of my time, interest and commitment.

It may be worth mentioning that this works only if your blockchain.com seed phrase is BIP39.
If you have an old blockchain.com seed phrase, your only option is to use blockchain.com itself there is no other tool that can calculate your keys.

It is difficult to know when guys are spouting out odds that really seem to be outrageous, and frequently they won't bet on those odds, so it may well be the case that they don't really believe it.  Personally, I have the sense that a guy should be willing to bet on any claims that he is making - even though I can appreciate that someone might want to have a bit of a margin for error, so even if he were proclaiming that the odds for going below $60k before January 1, 2027, he might say that he would ONLY be willing to bet on 80% odds, because he wants to retain some margin of error.

Another things that guys might not want the complications of betting in a forum like this, and surely there could be logistics reasons, personal privacy reasons or even some reasons of not really wanting to deal with certain other forum members...and even if we were to be able to get some agreed-to neutral member to escrow the matter.

The flip-floppers will tend to vary in their expectations, and it may well be true that they actually believe their claims, even when they are flip-flopping from one perspective to what might appear to be the opposite.

Regarding your claim of $60k being the top 2 years ago, that does not seem to be a very material piece of information, since in March 2021 we had top BTC prices in the $64.5k territories, and then in November 2021, we had BTC top prices in that touched on $69k, and then in early 2024, we returned into the $60ks, including achieving a new ATH prior to the April 2024 halvening.. and then even though maybe there was some stagnation between mostly $55k and $65k between April 2024 and October 2024, we ended up getting the trump pump in November 2024, and the rest of BTC's price history is more recently experienced.

In the beginning of the October 2025 correction, I thought it was ridiculous to be aiming for the then 200-WMA that was in the  $53.5k price territories, yet by the time the current local low of $59.9k was reached in early February of this year, the 200-WMA was in the ballpark of $58k, so the BTC price got quite close to hitting the 200-WMA, and surely all of those lows or new lows had become more and more possible than many of us had considered them to be.

You can review the historical changes in the 200-WMA as compared to the BTC spot price on this site.

And, all of the craziness of current times, and even the fact that the current BTC prices are currently only floating around 27% higher than the current 200-WMA (of $61.1k), these kinds of ongoing failures of the BTC price to go up, likely cause questions about the extent to which the BTC price might again correct below the 200-WMA, and even bitcoin is not immune from various macro-happenings, and even questionable levels of attack in relation to the ever increasing paper products that cause some centralized (perhaps BTC ETFs, Exchanges, MSTR, etc) holders to hold a lot of bitcoin keys. which likely is not good for the BTC price and/or the various empowerment aspects of bitcoin that comes through various forms of direct holding that would spread more to the retail (or individual) level.

My main contention right now, is that I cannot really feel rest assured that "the bottom is in" prior to my own feelings that we are out of the bear market, and I am not even saying that I am very sure about what kinds of price moves would be needed for me to conclude that we are "out of the bear market," and yeah, whether the odds for below $60k are merely bouncing around in the 50/50 territories or maybe some other value would be better applied to that sub-$60k price threshold seems beyond my own speculative imaginationings (at least in light of current seemingly relevant happenings/factors).

Paid now

https://blockstream.info/tx/75128a56e4e30815acb1abb5314e8090aef3385ab6eddba0525cc123b33d32cb

I withdrawn with bitcoin several times, and there is a Bitcoin address for withdrawal.
Reading your post, I test with USDT on ERC20 chain for withdrawal, and there is a USDT ERC20 Address too.

It is unreasonable if a withdrawal request does not include an address for it, and I am not sure why you got that issue?

Once you’ve won a prize in a SATS tournament, it’s easy to make the rankings in the next one. The prizes you win allow you to wager more SATS, and it becomes a cycle. As a result, I see the same names in the top 10 every week. I have a very low balance right now, but I’m confident I’ll secure a spot in this week’s tournament. I’ve started developing some strategies to place more bets, and I think I’ll make it into the top 50. From now on, I’m sure we’ll see you in the top 5 every week, @bitmover.


I hope you haven’t cashed out all your SATS. It’s really important to keep some in reserve so you can keep playing in the tournament and keep winning SATS. Otherwise, starting over from scratch is really hard, trust me, I speak from experience.

The answer to your question is that all your SATS will be converted into a certain amount of USDT in your Bitz account, and you can then withdraw them to your USDT address.

It can be considered as your Bitcoin "giftcard" to your friend and people with Internet can search and learn about Bitcoin very easily. How to spend coins from a wallet or how to import a private key for accessing the coin and spend it.

Especially now with AI, asking such questions will result in very quick but helpful answers and guides from AI. Reminder for everyone is never share private key with anyone, with any tool, as it's your key, and you must be the only one have it for actually owning your coin.

Like this answer with searching on Google.
It's a good answer to begin with and learn more after that.

@Cricktor Very helpful answer, thanks. Just to answer your very very first question, apparently my brother knows about bitcoin a lot, but not about teaching


Wow, I've watched some videos and read some guides. Looks like the seed phrase and the private key aren't the same thing. We could say that the seed phrase is a way to write down the entropy. I just went back to my thermodynamics physics classes. It's astonishing how all the dots connect.


I am sharing this opinion as well. After reading about bitcoin this weekend, it seems like a "paper wallet" is a very easy way to store bitcoin.
What I don't like however, is that my brother didn't tell me how he created the paper. If he created it in a public computer, or using a public network, I don't have to trust my brother only, but also the whole internet
I'll have to ask him - just considered this issue.


Yeah that's what I did this weekend and I plan to keep reading about it this week. Electrum looks good to me and it has the benefit that I can see the code online.
But you said 12 or 24 word seed phrase, does it make a difference? With a simple google search, a 12 word seed phrase generally covers 128 bits of entropy whereas 24 words cover 256 bits.
I remember - and just found in my cryptography class notes, that 128 bits is impractical and infeasible for a current computer to break.

I will mention that the liquidation phase could be one in which a person plans to completely cash out of their bitcoin over a certain period of time, and end up as a no coiner or it could be a phase in which a person is merely ongoingly shaving off a certain quantity of bitcoin in a sustainable withdrawal kind of way.  Sustainable withdrawal may well entail making sure that the withdrawal amount (in terms of dollars) is not greater than the amount that the bitcoin holdings are continuing to grow.

So in dollar value the whole bitcoin are growing faster than the amount being withdrawn.

So for example, I theorize that, right now, a person with at least 13.1002 BTC could withdraw $80k per year with a 7% raise in his withdraw rate each year forever and ever and ever.  And, surely if such person withdraws at the maximum of his withdrawal rate, then he may well end up making mistakes and withdrawing more BTC than his bitcoin holdings would be able to sustain.  One way of dealing with the uncertainty would be to withdraw at a lesser amount (such as at $60k per year), another way would be delay withdrawal until such a time that the amount of BTC would more comfortably sustain the $80k per year withdrawal rate, and another way would be to grow the bitcoin holdings to a higher amount, such as if the holding amount were to be 20 BTC, then surely, there is plenty of BTC quantity cushion (something like 50% extra BTC) to provide comfort that the chosen withdrawal rate would be sustainable in the way that it is calculated to be.


Lump sum and buying the dip are different strategies, and they do not need to be thought of in terms of combination in order to be understood as being profitable.

Lump sum tends to reflect an idea of either getting or already having a lot of money that is available to be able to be used to buy bitcoin.  So if the money is available, then there is a question of why not use it to buy bitcoin right away rather than deferring such buys (such as using DCA). So the advantage might come from buying right away, especially if the price ends up going up over the period that the DCA would otherwise apply.  The same is true whether someone comes to bitcoin as a brand new investor and he had already decided to invest in bitcoin, yet he is trying to determine the extent to which he should use  money that he already has available to buy bitcoin right away or to spread his bitcoin buys over some designated period of time.

People will frequently think about DCA as a form of delayed buying of bitcoin, yet it is not really necessarily employed in a way that is delayed, since a person who might be trying to be as aggressive as they can with their ongoing bitcoin buys, they may well be buying as much bitcoin as they are able to buy as soon as the money comes available, so that is not really delaying in buying since they are not really able to reasonably buy bitcoin until they are sure that they have the money as being available.


Yes, of course, we can all have goals to "have a good life," which justifies spending bitcoin, potentially even spending too much too soon in regards too the accumulated amount, the accumulation process and setting accumulation targets that likely will change because the unit of measure (whether the dollar or any other fiat) is constantly debasing at such a rate that our heads tend to be ongoingly spinning in terms of trying to fathom how we are going to keep up with such ongoing debasement.

It could be the case that you, Livingleged, also don't understand that bitcoin has abilities, possibilities and even a history in which its growth in value has outpaced the debasement of the dollar and other fiat currencies.

Let's say that a 35 year old guy with a $30k per year income started buying bitcoin at the beginning of 2016, and he used around $8k of his then $50k savings (various investments that he had been making in the prior 10 years), so his initial purchase of bitcoin ended up being spread out between January 2016 and June 2016, and he bought 18.155 bitcoin over those first 6 months of investing into bitcoin.

Thereafter, he reduced his bitcoin investment amount to $50 per week and he continued to invest into his other investments at $50 per week.  So in the subsequent nearly 10 years, he invested an additional $26k and he accumulated about 4.7 BTC.

Therefore right now, the guy would be in his mid-40s, and his bitcoin stash would be right around 22.855, which seems more than enough to support his $30k income, even if his income (or his expected life style) had gone up, right now a 22.855 BTC bitcoin income, his bitcoin quantity would support an income of nearly $140k per year with an increase of 7% in the dollar amount each year forever and ever and ever.

So why would any of us conclude that this particular guys does not have enough bitcoin, based on his having had started from a $30k income and consistently accumulating bitcoin over 10.5 years.  The fact of the matter is that this hypothetical guy could have had probably quit his job much earlier based on how his BTC stash had progressed and also based on how the value of the bitcoin had gone up over the years, including if we use the 200-WMA to valuate his bitcoin holdings and to figure out how much dollar value could start to be sustainably withdrawn.


For sure, the larger our bitcoin holdings, then the more we have to figure out ways of protecting our bitcoin stash, even if we might start to sell some of our bitcoin in a sustainable way from time to time.. and so far in bitcoin's history, there can be ways to figure out how to sell some bitcoin within boundaries that the value of the bitcoin continue to go up faster than our sell amounts..and it might not be clear exactly when we might feel that we had gone through our accumulation phase, reached our maintenance phase (which as the name suggests may well not involve net sales or buys), and then a point where we might start to sell some of our holdings.   

 RULES

---

• Pick a SLOT you like.  Last date to make your pick: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
• You can pick a 2ND ADDITIONAL SLOT if you contributed with a constructive comments in the Vega Bet ANN topic WITHIN 5 DAYS BEFORE THIS RAFFLE ANNOUNCEMENT.
  (In this case make sure you add comment link with your entry)
• You can pick a 3RD ADDITIONAL SLOT if you have a Vega Bet account which had at least $100 successful deposit. Don't have an account yet? Click here and register.
  
  • Deposit must not be more than 3 days old from the date you entered in this raffle
  • Taking three slots WITHOUT a Vega Bet minimum deposit will disqualify your winning
• We will find the winners using Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on my Telegram group
• My decisions are final, you must follow the Vega Bet Terms
• You will receive reward in your Vega Bet BTC account

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -
11   -
12   -
13   -
14   -
15   -
16   -
17   -
18   -
19   -
20   -
21   -
22   -
23   -
24   -
25   -
26   -
27   -
28   -
29   -
30   -
31   -
32   -
33   -
34   -
35   -
36   -
37   -
38   -
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   -
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   -
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   -
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   -
67   -
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   -
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   -
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   -

 ENTER

---

---

We have our winners for Vega bet free raffle round #6.
Check below-


Verify

Winners will receive their rewards soon. Stay with us and best of luck for next round.
Cheers!

We have our winners for the LuckyCoin welcome round of free raffle draw. Please check below-


Verify

Congratulations to the winners, you will get the reward shortly in your accounts.
Best of luck for the next round.

   369. 993021: Hockeybum (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   370. 998490: AlcoHoDL (Trust:  neutral) (6941 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   371. 1002739: OneNattyLitecoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   372. 1012655: khaled0111 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (3317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   373. 1013952: Icygreen (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (886 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   374. 1015954: aundroid (Trust:  neutral) (1157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   375. 1016105: rozak (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   376. 1024276: -doubleU- (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   377. 1025255: tyKiwanuka (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1575 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   378. 1027694: d_eddie (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5326 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   379. 1040400: btcapollo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   380. 1042589: raghavsood (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   381. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (2251 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   382. 1047996: bluefirecorp_ (Trust:  neutral) (142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   383. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   384. 1053119: Halab (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2664 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   385. 1068464: Xal0lex (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (2918 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   386. 1069987: Cryptoqueeen (Trust:  neutral) (117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   387. 1074603: Ramelius (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   388. 1076216: ThatRandomDude (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   389. 1078623: uelque (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   390. 1080073: Spack17 (Trust:  neutral) (291 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   391. 1091163: Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   392. 1099535: dolphriends (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   393. 1099774: alpencoin (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   394. 1103054: pasrical (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   395. 1105709: spider703 (Trust:  neutral) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   396. 1107222: Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (2451 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   397. 1108269: bitcoincidence (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   398. 1112467: goldkingcoiner (Trust:  neutral) (2930 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   399. 1112531: Steamtyme (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (1945 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   400. 1116811: saga-crypto (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   401. 1118969: JanEmil (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (754 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   402. 1124954: CLS63 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1824 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   403. 1130307: slackovic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1416 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   404. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust:  neutral) (2370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   405. 1134568: Tramirostronix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (240 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   406. 1136512: Xylber (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   407. 1137750: bavicrypto (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   408. 1138727: VB1001 (Trust:  neutral) (2825 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   409. 1153977: LUCKMCFLY (Trust:  neutral) (1786 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   410. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   411. 1164586: gpfrag (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (16 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   412. 1166480: Julien_Olynpic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5124 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   413. 1169179: Rath_ (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3137 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   414. 1170966: dragonvslinux (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (2243 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   415. 1171087: 2stout (Trust: +40 / =0 / -0) (572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   416. 1173695: sAj1420 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (3 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   417. 1177936: Veleor (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1566 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   418. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   419. 1188543: o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (18891 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   420. 1192397: paxmao (Trust:  neutral) (1635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   421. 1210149: ithd1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   422. 1210969: JSRAW (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1781 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   423. 1230577: fyoung55 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (60 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   424. 1237156: nc50lc (Trust:  neutral) (8699 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   425. 1237522: Plutosky (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5275 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   426. 1239916: ZipReg (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (842 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   427. 1260847: creep_o (Trust:  neutral) (1001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   428. 1275282: joniboini (Trust:  neutral) (1884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   429. 1283017: masulum (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   430. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +56 / =0 / -0) (579 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   431. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (3343 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   432. 1292764: notocactus (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (4936 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   433. 1297306: haloxon (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (534 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   434. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1515 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   435. 1342946: Deadrisinghelp (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   436. 1392550: zeki555 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   437. 1410401: dkbit98 (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (8672 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   438. 1422438: Paolo.Demidov (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   439. 1433865: witcher_sense (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (4440 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   440. 1452494: UserU (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (571 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   441. 1464056: Mrstacy (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   442. 1478835: MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +58 / =0 / -0) (3350 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   443. 1541583: sky999 (Trust:  neutral) (785 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   444. 1545702: DeepMining76 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (22 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   445. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (7423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   446. 1564795: Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1285 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   447. 1573369: casperBGD (Trust:  neutral) (1152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   448. 1573409: Souri (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (360 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   449. 1574226: mu_enrico (Trust:  neutral) (2374 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   450. 1580039: asche (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1492 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   451. 1583465: Dernoste (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (165 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   452. 1593137: famososMuertos (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4179 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   453. 1644820: bitcoiner24h (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   454. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +37 / =0 / -1) (1417 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   455. 1681586: RickDeckard (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (3214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   456. 1729238: UmerIdrees (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (939 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   457. 1762404: Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (962 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   458. 1775670: bubbalex (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   459. 1781771: Mbitr (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (1362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   460. 1803753: Kylapoiss (Trust:  neutral) (292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   461. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (2200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   462. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2608 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   463. 1855828: taikuri13 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1715 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   464. 1856285: Leviathan.007 Banned! (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (722 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   465. 1883627: shasan (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (1452 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   466. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2638 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   467. 1903411: BITCOIN4X (Trust:  neutral) (1193 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   468. 1926710: Renato297 (Trust:  neutral) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   469. 1932205: CucakRowo (Trust:  neutral) (593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   470. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   471. 2000200: 1Dq (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
   472. 2003707: kawetsriyanto (Trust:  neutral) (1183 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   473. 2005913: Corrosive (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   474. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (1572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   475. 2033515: mikeywith (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (7177 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   476. 2129514: VashaUdacha777 (Trust:  neutral) (97 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   477. 2136362: TalkStar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   478. 2148411: DIKUL (Trust:  neutral) (151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   479. 2154195: Nikisa (Trust:  neutral) (217 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   480. 2160117: Harkorede (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (1108 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   481. 2168312: yhiaali3 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (2616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   482. 2178170: Sayeds56 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   483. 2204241: ICOEthics (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
   484. 2221613: FontSeli (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (858 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

I don't think changing colors makes pages like this any better.

I have 30 million files on this server. Not all of them are HTML, maybe "only" 20 million, but adding a few kB to each of them quickly adds up to tens of GB extra (storage and bandwidth).

I wouldn't know how, but if this is possible, it may work for some sections.

Even TalkImg has been attacked!

I'm not going to defend theories of separation, but at the time, the sequence of events that allegedly led to this attack leads me to believe that sometimes attacks arise from other interests, and not the objective of directly stealing something from the site.

Well, you're also right I guess but Altcoinstalks got attacked because it allows mixers to advertise on the forum and we all know that such privacy services are disliked by many people. I know the admin of that forum has done a lot to keep it online and now users don't face CF issues at that forum either.

I'm not sure much about DDoS protection of BitList but at least I know that it's a site looked by TryNinja who has managed Ninjastic.space for many years and such a person know how to protect a platform against attacks. I wish that BitList should always be protected by the negative ones who use DDoS attacks to take good services down. If such a thing happens then CF protection is the only solution but that slows down a website.

I don't know what you're talking about here.
A site doesn't have to have a deposit option or anything like that to be a target of attacks. Altcoinstalks is just a forum, so the admin struggles to defend it from constant attacks.
I remember even bitmover's bitcoindata.science was once under attack, although it only had a few tools on it. So, what is the reason for the DDoS ​​attack on it?
As for site security, services like X, which have a huge budget and the best server resources, often go down.

Great place! Two more days, so it's far from over... I guess you will have to continue to play, and with a little (or a lot) luck maybe you can keep 5th place or even advance! Good luck, Bitmover... you will need it.



I decided to try the Hammer Crusher. Small balance, but I decided to try with a $0.6 base bet... I crushed just one egg/stone, or whatever that is, and that's it... total disaster and back to zero balance. I hope I will have more luck in the future...

I can vividly related to this because I was alos accumulating a little SATs at first, then I didn't really pay much attention to it to accumulate more, because thoughts it's was actually a daily tasks that wouldn't be valuable later, sometimes I used to forget to  participate, but as time goes on I started see how well some members here gave grown thier SATS steadily, well it was truly a consistent work.

O IA apenas pesquisou os ficheiros que ele tinha criado no PC.
Logo, ele já lá tinha a password, nunca tinha foi aberto aquele ficheiro. Então, a pergunta é: ele procurou realmente bem?

Qualquer das formas, claro que certamente iria tomar as medidas necessárias de segurança e iria tentar fazer rodar o IA para tentar ajudar.

Mas, lembre-se, se tem medo da computação quântica, este tipo de exercícios/casos, irão dar cada vez mais ferramentas ao IA para este tipo de casos, e criar uma maior porta de entrada para ser mal utilizada.


No final, fico sempre achar estranho estas historias... Mas, ainda bem para ele.

E bom que esse Claude foi honesto, a primeira coisa que ia pensar é se tiver um client, ate com API legitimas mas que opera segundo uma logica de malware... ia dar muita dor de cabeça pra quem tem as private Keys armazenadas diretamente no computador

I came across this tournament via bitmover post. Since then I've been very motivated but I haven't accumulated many SATS since the beginning. Because I thought it wouldn't be of much use later. But now even though the tournament is running every week, I can't make any progress. Finished all my sats at last week tournament. Now there are only 700+ SATS, so thinking to take few weeks break and save SATS.

Pesquise Claude Desktop. A IA está muito avançada e faz tudo por você no computador ou rodando comandos no servidor

Pense que ele passou 10 anos sem esperança e com apenas uma mensagem, a IA busca uma solução nova e executa os comandos como precisam ser executados. Para quem não tinha esperança é um salto de fé que vale a pena tentar, e ele pagou

Asa he hai, Enho ny BTT sy related almost har tool ko apni websit par integrate kar diya hai. Like agar apko idea ho to pehly bitmover ka tool use kiya jata tha free raffle announcement ke liya laikn phir Bitlist ny ya wala tool bhi apni website par intriduce kar diya. Ab enho ny website mai hoor improvement ki hai wo ya ke mari de gyee suggestion par enho ny BB aur imgtalk ka internative introduce karwa diya hai jo ke meray khayal sy enki website ke liya sonay par sohaga ke tarha apna role play kary ga. Eska faida ya bhi hoga ke website ke traffic hor increase hogi es tools ki waja sy.

Phir enho ny nijastic space bhi bitlist mai integrate kar diya hai. Like every tool jo ke BTT users ki need hai on sabko enho ny ak he platform par merge kar diya hai. All in one stop. Baki ya to hum sirf abhi tools ki baat kar rhy hain, esky elawa baki jo bhi BTT aur ALTT par campaigns ati hain wo sab ki sab jo trusted hai sab enki website par listed hain aur jo campaigns end bhi ho chuki hai laikn trusted hai wo bhi listed hai bitlist par. So ap yaha sy idea laga skty hain ke enho ny ya project kitna bhara bana liya hai, aur kitna faida ho rha hai team ko.

Congratulation to you in advance mate..
I was not able to participate this time around.
But I will not miss this contest next time.
Bitz casino has really been trying their best to keep their platform very busy this time around, and this is a very good strategy.

Mas, ele tinha a IA a rodar localmente?

Porque, sinceramente, não queria uma IA a vasculhar o meu PC. Mesmo que fosse um antigo.
O PC pode nem ter o conteúdo importante/relevante que tenho conhecimento, mas ele existe em bits. Além disso, para fazer este tipo de analise, ele teve deixar esses ficheiros lá.

Sim, é interessante ver a utilidade do IA. Mas, no final, ele tinha lá o ficheiro com a senha, mesmo sem IA ele conseguia lá chegar, só tinha de procurar um pouco melhor.

I think it’s all in the same category of what OP has said I can can categorically say that anyone who had actually has all this altcoin wallet or multi coin wallet and uses them regularly must have been a victim of this in the past, I have similar experience like Nwada001 but mine was actually with NFT, how naive I was I will say.


This was a popular scam back then, I think what OP just describes right now is advancement of this scam which is the scammer doesn’t have to wait for you to actually do it repeatedly as what he gathers is from the gas fee. I think this new scam takes everything at a go because of 100% tax embedded.

Great!

Thanks I included your suggestion in the thread. 

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   - Livingleged
5   -
6   - Tanelhole
7   - tvplus006
8   - Itz-prisigold
9   - Uvarlost
10   - Qjmak333
11   - Ventazz
12   - NuckaBTC
13   - Antdm
14   - HausaBitCkk
15   - Odenleva09
16   - LNC999
17   -
18   - LokhcfyBit
19   - Wolimmon
20   - Yoona_As
21   - Pmalek
22   - inearth
23   - ASK Day
24   - wengibway
25   - bitzizzix
26   - HarvestOpan
27   - Soqunami
28   - Eardwot
29   -
30   - Joy- maker
31   - Mr. Magkaisa
32   - johnsaributua
33   - Dropsera
34   - Hypnotizer
35   -
36   - Pmalek
37   - bitmover
38   -
39   - Ricardo11
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   - Xifi
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   - f150
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   - xGennady
56   -
57   - SpongeS
58   - Hello5
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   - Hatchy
66   -
67   -
68   -
69   - Ninja Primes
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   - RTX-G53
74   - Jiopen
75   -
76   -
77   -
78   -
79   - Fulllove1
80   -
81   -
82   - Improved
83   - Kuconas
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   - Protonvive
92   -
93   - WhattheFk
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   - bitbollo

Thanks! I found it and I'm already playing. Dropped some sats on Plinko 2, which is a game I really like, but didn't have much luck this time. I'll set another bankroll aside later and give it another shot soon!

Nutildah goes after a lot non DT members without fact. All these people can’t be wrong.

When you think they're on a break from pleasing customers, BITZ.io would come up with another suprise in form of a tournament, it's amazing, good to know that I can now participate in a tournament with the Sats that I've been accumulating and I'll give it a trial if what I have is enough to participate in the tournament.
 Thanks for your Good luck wishes, I think COINFLIP would be more interesting than others but I've been a fan of ROCK PAPER scissors so I'll give that a trial first before others, Good luck to you too.

For Sats tournament you need to play selected games... from this week 5 games:


Of course, you need to play with sats... so select sats currency, and visit: https://bitz.io/tournaments/3969

Good luck Bitmover! I will give it a try as well, but my balance is to low so I don't hope much...

Good luck to all players!

I didn't make any changes to the settings. Therefore, it should work as before.

Can you tell me if this is happening to everyone or was it just an isolated case?

Winner: 28 - Itz-prisigold

Winner 2: 13 - Mehmet69

Winner 3: 10 - lodocus

Verify here

Please DM me your Bitz.io Bitcoin deposit address.

 RULES

---

• Pick a SLOT you like.  Last date to book your slot: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
  (Do not have an account with LuckyCoin? Register using the url: https://go.luckycoin.com/click?o=1&a=6&c=3&link_id=2)
• Review LuckyCoin Casino & Sportsbook, share a constructive feedback about your review on the LuckyCoin ANN topic - you can pick a 2ND ADDITIONAL SLOT.
  (In this case make sure you add comment link with your entry)
• You can not edit your entry. If necessary then remove the old entry and make a new one.
• We will find the winners using Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on the 💰 R7 Bounty Hunters - Telegram Chat
• My decisions are final, you must follow the LuckyCoin Terms
• You will receive reward in your LuckyCoin account

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -
11   -
12   -
13   -
14   -
15   -
16   -
17   -
18   -
19   -
20   -
21   -
22   -
23   -
24   -
25   -
26   -
27   -
28   -
29   -
30   -
31   -
32   -
33   -
34   -
35   -
36   -
37   -
38   -
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   -
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   -
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   -
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   -
67   -
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   -
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   -
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   -

 ENTER

---

---

How does this 'Sats' tournament work? I looked for it here at the casino but couldn't find it. I'm actually looking for some different games to play; I'm getting a bit bored of 'Fortune Tiger,' which is my go-to... any suggestions? I'm into slots!

It's time
proxyimages.bitcoindata.science can go to 38.102.86.40 again

Talvez, não me tenha explicado.

Estava a dizer é que, se o objetivo do Bitcoin é ir contra o sistema inflacionário e de controlo, não faz sentido dizer que ele foi criado com o objetivo de comprarmos a moeda desse sistema.

Mas, pronto, isso já é outro tipo de debate.

 SLOTS

---

1   - Pandorak
2   - Porfirii
3   - Dip69
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   - Taricoins
8   - inearth
9   - Ninja Primes
10   - Ricardo11
11   - Antdm
12   - Yoona_As
13   - WhattheFk
14   - Eardwot
15   - Protonvive
16   - Kuconas
17   - LNC999
18   - Qjmak333
19   - Fulllove1
20   - ASK Day
21   - RTX-G53
22   - Hello5
23   - NuckaBTC
24   - Soqunami
25   - Tanelhole
26   - Wolimmon
27   - LokhcfyBit
28   -
29   - Odenleva09
30   -
31   - viljy
32   -
33   - Jiopen
34   -
35   - Kadelvibess
36   - G00LA
37   - slapper
38   - Xifi
39   - Leahized
40   - bitmover
41   -
42   - Pmalek
43   -
44   -
45   - SpongeS
46   - fillippone
47   - Obim34
48   -
49   -
50   - MainIbem
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   - LastKiss
56   -
57   -
58   - Zangi777
59   - TFIRD
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   - MGVVY55
65   -
66   - Itz-prisigold
67   - Ventazz
68   -
69   - Itz-prisigold
70   -
71   -
72   - Takiya24
73   - odunybiz
74   -
75   -
76   - VashaUdacha777
77   -
78   -
79   -
80   - HausaBitCkk
81   -
82   - Improved
83   -
84   - f150
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   - HarvestOpan
99   - FRkgWoo
100   - malcovi2

A ideia de produtos supérfluos é outra questão.
É o mesmo de pagar um pão com um cheque ou com dinheiro vivo.

Se queres fugir a inflação ou ao controlo da rede, não é só usar o Bitcoin com forma de comprar mais moeda que gera inflação ou controlo de rede.

Porque se fosse apenas essa a ideia, nunca teríamos tido o Pizza Day.
Mas, isso já é outro debate.

Mas ter ETF Bitcoin, não é usar bitcoin. É apenas beneficiar da sua valorização (ou não).
Igual a ter outro ETF qualquer.

Isso não é usar bitcoin.

Sim, era essa a ideia do Nikolas Tesla.
Por isso ele ter criado o projeto Wardenclyffe.

Mas, claro, energia gratuita e abundante? Nem pensar. Tudo coloco na gaveta...

Também comecei a ver e parei na metade.. alguma hora preciso acabar.. mas é isso ai, parece que os caras tem tesão em ditadura, não tem outro assunto.

Você pode pedir para o Google borrar a sua casa. Fonte: https://support.google.com/maps/thread/212176423/como-fa%C3%A7o-para-remover-e-desfocar-a-minha-casa-no-google-maps-vista-do-c%C3%A9u?hl=pt

Mas na minha opinião, isso chama ainda mais atenção.. dá uma olhada na história desse cara suspeito de ser o Satoshi Nakamoto:


Às vezes o melhor disfarce é se juntar à multidão e agir normalmente.

You need to have a deposit in the last 7 days to claim Bitcoin faucet and Calendar