bitmover's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned bitmover in the past 7 days

Quote from: bitmover on August 26, 2026, 10:52:27 AM

This is what signing a message was created for.
But, other people could have the keys as well.
-snip

How about the signed message from the previous transaction before the sweeps?

Pretty sure the majority of the addresses are dormant addresses before they got sweeps, peopel are usually send their BTC after they got the hardware wallet > created the seed & wallet > then send the BTC > and leave it for such a long time.

They fill it the fund with either sending from another address or buying it from the exchange.

Quote from: Wind_FURY on Today at 07:52:49 AM

Quote from: bitmover on August 24, 2026, 09:13:25 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on August 24, 2026, 08:22:49 AM

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on August 23, 2026, 11:41:18 PM

I imagine there is likely more than one class action being cooked up.

Would they have deep enough pockets for this? I can imagine they spent a lot of money on marketing, sales and the actual product, while they didn't sell that many devices. So if all buyers want their money back, they don't have that amount. If the victims want their losses compensated, they won't have that kind of money it either.

I wonder if they will be able to find the users who now hold those 1500 btc. One small mistake when spending, even in a kyc free exchange (like an ip leak), might expose their identities

Tell will tell if someone from coldcard is involved

That ColdCard CTO who made an anonymous account and he was talking to the account - HIMSELF, in Github is already a red flag in my opinion.

This issue should definitely be investigated. Users have lost their savings because of developer-INCOMPETENCE or developers being BAD ACTORS.

Yes, he's a red flag, but we can talk about the unprofessional service provided by the Coldcard team and not talk about people who spent weeks assisting Bitcoin holders who were affected by the Coldcard vulnerability by helping them to transfer their funds to safety, with the estimation of tens of millions of dollars worth of BTC protected during the period the Coldcard vulnerability occurred.
https://x.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/2092703792944808228

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:26:37 PM

Acho que é aproveitar os momentos de ATH para vender, se for o caso. Vender antes de surgir a necessidade.

Agora por exemplo não é boa hora para vender, na minha opiniao

passando de 100k USD (ou 500k reais) começa a ficar mais atrativo, e se vc estiver precisando criar uma reserva para emergencias, pode ser uma boa hora.

Muitas vezes quando não há necessidade, nem se pensa em vender. Porque se vender, vai colocar o dinheiro onde.
Claro que existem sempre alternativas, mas Bitcoin é Bitcoin.

No final, nunca se sabe o momento certo de vender ou comprar. Então eu sempre tive a ideia de ir usado, quando realmente acho que preciso usar, sem olhar muito para se está a subir ou descer. Claro que também não vou às cegas, mas tento equilibrar a coisa, sem ficar muito obsecado com o valor.

Quote from: bitmover on August 25, 2026, 11:59:03 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on August 22, 2026, 02:42:46 PM

...

Entropy wasn't something "sexy" to talk about before this coldcard incident. I think ledger lost a lot of customers, who migrate to coldcard and trezor. Now, trezor entropy revealed to be inferior to competitors, they might be trying to fix this.

At least I hope this incident serves as a lesson so that nothing like this ever happens again
If that happens, it will at least be a step forward for security

I ended up regenerating some wallets I had here, including my Trezor, where instead of 12 words, I generated a 24-word seed with a passphrase
I hope I won’t have to regenerate them and move everything again, but if Trezor improves the entropy, I’ll end up doing it again

My Ledger wallet was already generated with 24 words, I think that was standard back then, so I didn’t change anything on that one

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:52:14 AM

Se voce depositar R$ 50mil no Nubank por exemplo

Calma, calma Cheesy

estou querendo usar US$ 50,00 para assinar serviços online com esses cartões.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:52:14 AM

E quando o ganho é de 3%, acaba que dura apenas 2-3 meses para atrair dinheiro e clientes e depois o cartão fica ruim.

Lembro que um tempo atrás rolou uma treta assim com os cartões da CryptoCom.. eles tinham vários "planos" que você precisava bloquear a moeda deles, etc. para ter cashbacks maiores.. mas ai, do nada, cortaram vários benefícios e a galera ficou puta..

Pelo menos, não estou vendo essa prática nesses novos cartões.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:31:56 AM

Por que você teria chaves privadas que não vieram de HD wallets? Queria entender.

Você não usava bitcoin na época em que isso existia. Hoje em dia só quem tem vanity addresses ou quer recuperar forks (coisa que já não existe faz tempo tb) que precisaria mexer com private keys individualmente

Cara, basicamente o que você e os outros estão propondo lá é que quem quiser que uma imported key/wallet se comporte em relação ao troco é uma solução remediável, não a que corta o problema na raiz, usando o pay to many apontando ! pro endereço de troco, não cara. E se eu quiser gastar de um ou mais outputs que está lá na outra carteira, a HD padrão e quiser juntar com o private key importado, eu não quero ter que expor as chaves privadas da conta HD, pra importar na carteira de chaves importados só pra fazer a transação, está vendo que não resolve, só cria mais problema?

Mas parece que meu esforço de argumentar é em vão, eu não gosto dessa ideia de que: "ah só porque ele é um user avançado, ele que se vire", não é assim, é fato que reutilizar um endereço é um problema de privacidade e até de segurança, a premissa básica de uma carteira bitcoin é de não reutilizar um endereço, por que o mesmo argumento desaparece no caso de quem usa paper wallet ou por algum motivo usa um endereço importado?

Não importa o que o usuário faz com a chave, o que importa é se tem solução pro caso de uso dele (bitcoin core já tem), mas eu posso usar o bitcoin core porque tenho espaço no SSD, mas eu aposto que a maioria das pessoas não tem, se houvesse mais carteiras com o mesmo comportamento do Core já resolveria.

Quote from: joker_josue on Today at 06:51:54 AM

I understand the idea. But the question is: how does Electrum know which is my "default" HD wallet?

For Electrum, each HD wallet is viewed independently. That's why when you open two wallets, they open in different windows.
Furthermore, there is no default wallet. The wallet that appears when you start Electrum is the last wallet you had open.

A user can have 10 HD wallets, even saved in different system folders. How would Electrum know which address exists in wallet X, if it doesn't even know that wallet exists, unless it's open?

The only way to do this was to indicate in the settings that wallet X was the primary one.
But by doing that, wouldn't it become more dangerous in terms of privacy? Because it could create connections between wallets.

This is just one of the proposals that came up in this discussion. I don't think it's feasible, as it's complicated and currently, as far as I remember, no wallet currently does or has implemented this. But let's say it were implemented, you just need to add any of the options below (one or more) in advanced sending to:

Manually select a change address, as proposed by Pmalek (and there are wallets that do this, for example, Bitcoin Core if you enable coin control), image example below
Optionally, there would be an option that opens a selection box for wallets that the user has generated, which could be HD Standard or imported from isolated keys or addresses. Electrum doesn't need to guess where the change is going or which wallet is primary. Again, Bitcoin Core already has this option (manually specify a change address if coin control is enabled).

But I keep hammering the point that:

The best solution for this was initially proposed by SomberNight, the creation of an advanced wallet with support for multiple scripts (or not) that would allow the import of private keys as well, and Electrum sends the change spent from that address to the HD account, period, simple to solve and painless.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 10:40:02 AM

I would not consider this a workaround. This is a basic wallet feature, which people use everyday.
It is the native way of the wallet to solve the problem you mentioned, the address reuse in case of change.

I'm not saying that pay to many is a workaround, I'm saying that using it specifically to designate the change is a workaround, there's a big difference between the purpose of pay to many and change addr.

Basically, the way Electrum handles my imported keys today is exactly like this:

"Here, we created a rented room for you (imported-only keystore, privkey-only or addresses watch-only), but there's no balcony because we don't know if you're stupid enough to want to jump out the balcony, while other residents are VIPs (HD wallets) and have balconies, terraces, and rooftop pools, because we assume they know what they're doing. If you don't like it, rent another apartment (use another wallet) or buy ours (do a sweep transferring everything to the HD wallet)."

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 10:40:02 AM

The wallet doesn't force you to reuse the address, even when you import a private key.

Of course, it forces me to, when I import a private key (creating a keystore called "imported" only for private keys and not public addresses), the change goes back to the imported key (bad for privacy), even if I enable use change addresses the wallet sends the change to a random address if there's more than one imported key. This isn't ideal either and just messes things up. In other words, it forces me to use this imported keystore that doesn't communicate with the standard HD or BIP39 imported keystores, with a "use change addresses" function that works in a stupid way, trying to guess where the change to a new virgin address goes, much worse than when they removed the import feature from the deterministic HD keystores (electrum v2.0).

The solution to all this is very simple:

Just keep what already worked well before v2.0, imported keys were saved in the same keystore as the HD wallet and this discussion wouldn't even exist in the first place, that's how Bitcoin Core works today
The option to create a wallet only for imported keys could be kept exactly as it works today, the only difference is that the import option would appear again in the standard HD electrum wallets (BIP39 or Standard Electrum) to satisfy users who demand that: imported private keys would no longer be reused > change goes to the HD account. This would solve the problem of the privacy of the imported private key
Or the creation of an advanced wallet for advanced users as proposed by SomberNight.

To be clear, my intention is not to use imported addresses forever, I would just like the imported keys to have same behavior as HD wallets regarding change and non-reuse. I'm thinking of users who use paper wallets who wish to use reliable software like Electrum or any other wallet like Bluewallet, preserving their privacy. The funds would be temporarily transferred to the HD keystore, which has paths for receiving /0 and changing /1, so that they can then transfer everything to a paper wallet or other cold storage, or why not, transfer directly to an integrated hardware wallet?

In my view, the best way to solve this would be to add an option to create an advanced wallet with support for multiple types of scripts and descriptors for users who know how to handle descriptors. As I've said many times, I'm being repetitive, seriously, it shouldn't be complicated to understand my reasoning.

Quote from: bitmover on August 25, 2026, 03:00:07 PM

Ja pensou quanto teria de tivesse feito hold de tudo que ganhou aqui nos fóruns ate hoje?

Acho que essa é uma bao reflexão

Não me torture Cheesy

Mas tenho alguns punhados de satoshis que guardei de campanhas passadas
É legal ver que uma campanha de 60 dólares no passado, virou 3x mais nos valores de hoje

Quote from: alegotardo on Today at 01:39:27 AM

Se eu, tivesse guardado só o que ganhei com as campanhas, já estaria aposentado vivendo de rendimentos e ainda sobraria para investir!
Mas, eu não penso só nisso, como já contei algumas vezes, o que ganhei com Bitcoin aqui e em outros lugares me salvou de uma crise financeira ferrenha uns anos atrás, se não fosse por ele eu acho que teria perdido até meu veiculo na época.

Somos holders, mas Bitcoin não é pra se levar pro caixão e esperar alguém secar quando a computação quântica chegar... é sobre realizar sonhos ou te salvar de perrengues quando necessário.

Acho que você já contou essa história uma vez aqui e acho incrível como o BTC pode servir em momentos de dificuldade, sem que você precise pegar empréstimo, pedir a alguém, vender algo importante seu...

Eu tenho muito dificuldade de vender meus satoshis, espero nunca precisar vender por necessidade, mas é uma segurança boa ter algo para liquidar

Quote from: avp2306 on August 25, 2026, 03:35:44 PM

Quote from: examplens on August 25, 2026, 08:50:08 AM

Quote from: bitmover on August 24, 2026, 09:13:25 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on August 24, 2026, 08:22:49 AM

Would they have deep enough pockets for this? I can imagine they spent a lot of money on marketing, sales and the actual product, while they didn't sell that many devices. So if all buyers want their money back, they don't have that amount. If the victims want their losses compensated, they won't have that kind of money it either.

I wonder if they will be able to find the users who now hold those 1500 btc. One small mistake when spending, even in a kyc free exchange (like an ip leak), might expose their identities

Tell will tell if someone from coldcard is involved

Well, there are indications that the hacker made a mistake and exposed information about himself. Activities were recognised where the operator used a paid account on a "well-known" blockchain service. A pattern of querying the original addresses was observed during the attack and this was repeated.

https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/19/block-and-galaxy-research-give-lead-to-law-enforcement-in-111m-coldcard-bitcoin-theft/

Now that they already traced the hacker, its good to see what other action they made. Because many people are so curious about this case, they want those people involve in this hacking issue to get captured.

Maybe this is also the reason why the funds stolen has left unmoved? https://crypto.news/coldcard-hackers-leave-87-of-stolen-bitcoin-unmoved-after-114m-theft they are maybe afraid to do transaction because it can create fresh traces to the authorities.

They should act fast, so they can still recover the funds and return it back to those proven victims.

The question now remains, how will the victims prove that their bitcoin was stolen?
Since there is no kyc to be able to identify owners?

Quote from: bitmover on August 25, 2026, 10:30:51 AM

Quote from: tvbcof on August 25, 2026, 09:30:30 AM

I am not a lawyer, but according to the official story (which studiously avoids any 'conspiracy theories') I'm not really sure I see a crime here.
...

You don't see a crime in transfering 1500 BTC (millions of dollars) from random people to your own wallet? What are you talking about.

Shades of the Owens/Wilson debate here. 'Can you name a charge?'

Of course I am playing devil's advocate (aka, trolling) to some degree, but it's also a serious question to answer prior to contemplating legal action.

Quote from: bitmover on August 25, 2026, 10:30:51 AM

It is the same as hacking a bank app and transferring money to your own account.

Here is my opinion from a bona-fide O.G. standpoint. There is a huge difference in that fiat currency is, pretty much by definition, backed by the state. They have an obligation to expend resource in defense of their authorization of chosen central bank's 'liability' (which is what we call money.) Such a thing was never expected and never requested by the Bitcoin community (in earlier times at least) and 'we' would do nothing but laugh in the faces of those who lost their savings through, say, inflation.

If the state enforcement apparatus is required to expend resources to recover funds from hardware wallet mis-haps then they have every right to demand that all such devices are submitted for public use certification prior to use. I would hope to hell that very very few people would want that.

The 'law' in Bitcoinland has always been 'not your keys, not your coin', and very few people would have missed that message...though more than a few may have not dwelt on it long enough to have imparted meaningful mental impact.

I would be amenable to the argument that stealing _anything_ is illegal, and since we all pay taxes, we all deserve efforts by the state to to right such a wrong in a general sort of a way. (If I were the opponents attorney I would argue that the plaintiff dropped the items in question on the ground and the accused simply picked them up.) I just wouldn't bet a lot of money that a lot of effort resources would be expended.

Now, if things progress into 'conspiritard territory' and evidence of collusion between some of the parties emerges, we very well may be looking at some serious charges. But we are not there yet as far as I can see, and with everyone chasing their tails, I seriously doubt that we ever will be.

Quote from: bitmover on August 24, 2026, 09:13:25 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on August 24, 2026, 08:22:49 AM

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on August 23, 2026, 11:41:18 PM

I imagine there is likely more than one class action being cooked up.

Would they have deep enough pockets for this? I can imagine they spent a lot of money on marketing, sales and the actual product, while they didn't sell that many devices. So if all buyers want their money back, they don't have that amount. If the victims want their losses compensated, they won't have that kind of money it either.

I wonder if they will be able to find the users who now hold those 1500 btc. One small mistake when spending, even in a kyc free exchange (like an ip leak), might expose their identities

Tell will tell if someone from coldcard is involved

That ColdCard CTO who made an anonymous account and he was talking to the account - HIMSELF, in Github is already a red flag in my opinion.

This issue should definitely be investigated. Users have lost their savings because of developer-INCOMPETENCE or developers being BAD ACTORS.

Quote from: bitmover on August 25, 2026, 11:59:03 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on August 22, 2026, 02:42:46 PM

I don't know if you've seen this Trezor response

https://x.com/Trezor/status/2089697469042979060

I found it really interesting, they're considering offering the option to roll the dice for entropy

Entropy wasn't something "sexy" to talk about before this coldcard incident. I think ledger lost a lot of customers, who migrate to coldcard and trezor. Now, trezor entropy revealed to be inferior to competitors, they might be trying to fix this.

Does trezor really have a choice? If their entropy lags behind that of competitors, they will lose marketing ground (market share). Especially after the Coldcard incident, users will be extremely particular about such details.

In short, HW's manufacturers (all of them) have no choice in the sense that they must constantly improve their devices and seek ways to enhance reliability. If generating the seed-phrase using dice "strengthens" trezor, then so be it (if only they don't break anything

).

Trezor owners will await the addition of this feature and prepare to migrate their crypto-assets.

Quote from: bitmover on August 25, 2026, 03:00:07 PM

Ja pensou quanto teria de tivesse feito hold de tudo que ganhou aqui nos fóruns ate hoje?

Acho que essa é uma bao reflexão

Se eu, tivesse guardado só o que ganhei com as campanhas, já estaria aposentado vivendo de rendimentos e ainda sobraria para investir!
Mas, eu não penso só nisso, como já contei algumas vezes, o que ganhei com Bitcoin aqui e em outros lugares me salvou de uma crise financeira ferrenha uns anos atrás, se não fosse por ele eu acho que teria perdido até meu veiculo na época.

Somos holders, mas Bitcoin não é pra se levar pro caixão e esperar alguém secar quando a computação quântica chegar... é sobre realizar sonhos ou te salvar de perrengues quando necessário.

Quote from: bitmover on August 20, 2026, 06:45:36 PM

Quote from: sabotag3x on August 20, 2026, 05:30:32 PM

Quote from: criptoevangelista on August 13, 2026, 11:04:43 AM

E eu ainda fico mais impressionado com a galera que mantém cinco, seis, sete contas, várias contas, às vezes até dezenas de contas, tentando pegar o máximo de campanhas possíveis.

Essa semana rolou algo parecido lá no X.. a comunidade denunciou um perfil que só roubava conteúdo de outras pessoas..

No fim, um funcionário do Musk descobriu que o cara estava participando com mais de 10 contas no programa de recompensa deles para criadores de conteúdo.. disse que o cara ganhou mais de US$ 250.000 (R$ 1,3 milhão!!) nos últimos dois anos.

Como que funciona esse programa de recompensa pra criador de conteudos?
Me parece bastante lucrativo, mesmo para quem nao fraude o sistema com muitas contas.

Voce tem o link.?

Então, acho que é bem lucrativo mesmo, se não me engano alguem a um tempo atrás comentou que a disruptivas abandonou o fórum para se dedicar mais ao twitter pois la as possibildiades de pagamento eram bem melhores... para quem tem bastante seguidores deve valer realmente bem a pena, financeiramente falando e tambem as oportunidades de networking que devem rolar por la...

eu tenho minha conta la desde 2010 e uso bem pouco, hoje em dia apenas para ler as coisas, mas eu acho o twitter muito exagerado e polarizado, é muita gente falando muita merda a todo momento.

I’m very disappointed that you think this way, but let's move on. I’ll try to answer each of you.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:21:35 AM

I agree that considering a new wallet for each imported private key isnt a good solution
One alternative for the change address is to fully spend the recovered coins to a HD wallet.

When you say "recovered", you're referring to importing, right? If so, yes, e.g:
HD Account #0 (default) – Change from imported keys goes here.
HD Account #1
HD Account #2
Imported – whatever is spent from this keystore, the remaining balance (change) is sent to one of the keystores above or some keystore chosen by the user, it’s a sort of wallet creation feature within advanced options. SomberNight (one of Electrum's main devs) has already hinted at something like this: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6016

That already solves part of the problem.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:21:35 AM

But the days of saving private keys are gone. Since bip 39 and hd wallets (2013!) There is no reason to save private keys individually. Sometimes you might want to do that to recover forked coins or some other very specific usage.

bitmover, just because "no one" uses isolated keys anymore doesn't mean we have to kill the feature at all. If we followed that logic, we would kill the sweep feature too, since no one prints paper wallets anymore. Yet you still see a large number of wallets supporting that feature. That’s not how things are solved.
Self-custody is also about maintaining legacy restoration and handling methods. As I’ve said, there will always, always, be use cases different from yours or the majority of users.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:21:35 AM

I hardly think wallets will try to improve user experience in importing private keys individually. Bip 39 seeds are way better for 99% of the situations

If no one flags it to them, they certainly won't do it. BIP39 seed phrases are great, but that’s not the discussion here.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:45 AM

The wallets like Electrum are deterministic which means when you create a wallet all the keys inside that wallet are supposed to be derived from a seed.

I know that wallets generated by Electrum are deterministic. I mentioned "HD" 03 times in the OP.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:45 AM

If they allow you to import a separate key into that same wallet file, then it will contain a single key that cannot be derived from that seed and cannot be recovered by it either. It also creates complications for other parts of the code which need to take that into consideration.

That’s not true, as I said, Electrum had this feature before v2.0, watch this video, and Bitcoin Core works exactly the way I described, so it is possible to implement it without breaking other parts of the code.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:45 AM

So it is easier to force the user to create a separate wallet that consists of all imported keys and has no seed.

With the design I explained above, the wallet without a seed cannot "derive" any new keys to be used for change. So you have 2 options: (1) manually select a change address (2) use your wallet with seed and sweep the key instead of importing it. After that each spend will create a change address.

No, nothing forced is acceptable in a self-custody environment, so such a thing shouldn't be acceptable. If at least the imported wallet keystore worked in a way that let the user choose where the change goes (like the scenario I suggested above to bitmover) or specify an output address... but no, it works in a completely lousy way, ended up reusing addresses.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:45 AM

Reusing address is not recommended but it is not as terrible as you think. Specially from a security perspective, as long as the wallet you are using is not broken there is no reason to attack your keys just because you revealed the public key and if it is broken then you should not be using it for anything let alone for this.

Just because something is not as terrible as I think it is, that doesn't mean we should just give up and not follow security best practices. I’m not worried about being attacked, I just wish the wallet I’m using offered at least the options I mentioned. That’s all. Is that too much to ask?

I’m not asking Electrum to create isolated keys the way Core used to, I’m just asking for at least an "advanced wallet" option in Electrum that allows for importing private keys and addresses, and gives the user 100% control over where the change goes (or, by default, sends it to an HD account pre-selected by the software). SomberNight has already expressed interest in this: implement advanced wallet option: multiple xpubs, mixed script types, and similar (maybe with output script descriptors)

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:45 AM

They did. In early versions, each key was created randomly therefore the wallet file had to be backed up again after each key generation (it generated multiple at a time though).
In later versions, they made it deterministic meaning new keys were still generated using that original seed (seed is the entropy used for child key derivation, not to me confused with mnemonic).

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:45 AM

And exactly because in bitcoin core you have to create a file-backup of your wallet (it doesn't support mnemonic) the approach can be different.

Actually no, Bitcoin Core doesn't need to back up the wallet file repeatedly anymore, it doesn't generate "a bunch of keys" in batches. Bitcoin Core uses BIP32, and keys are generated from the BIP32 root key (the xpriv), so it creates deterministic wallets. I explain this further in my thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5498210.0

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 10:04:38 AM

As you know, Electrum doesn't allow users to generate a single private key, and whenever you want to generate a new wallet, it only allows them to generate a HD wallet.

That's not what I expressed interest in. I didn't ask Electrum to provide an option to create isolated keys, I’m referring to the existing key import feature, and whether the software would provide an "advanced wallet" option where the user can choose which account/keystore the change goes to, or if an imported key is added to the current HD keystore it was imported into, exactly like it worked prior to version 2.0 (that last scenario I mentioned).

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 10:04:38 AM

Therefore most of Electrum users (including almost all non-techincal users) have a HD wallet with seed phrase and since the "Use change address" option is enabled by default, they always use change addresses for their transactions.

The import private key feature in Electrum is mostly used by technical users and those who have very old wallets created before seed phrase were introduced.

The use change address option only works well for standard Electrum wallets or imported HD wallets, but not for imported keys and addresses. Test it yourself with testnet coins: import a few private keys into an "imported" wallet, check the "use change address" option, and you'll see what I mean. You'll find that with imported key keystores:

- use change address doesn't work as well as it does in HD wallets, there is no control.
- You have to keep importing new private keys so that new change outputs go to new imported keys, following the order in which they were imported (as they appear in the Addresses tab, respecting the queue).
- You cannot import public addresses into a keystore where you initially imported private keys and vice-versa during creation. Why? What is the logic behind that?

Run this test, and you should reach the same conclusion.

The Electrum developer himself has pointed out that Electrum's current architecture (especially for imported keystores) is "severely limited." He proposes creating an advanced wallet with features for advanced users, one that would allow importing xprivs/xpubs and even private keys/addresses (exactly how it currently works in Bitcoin Core). See here: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6016

Quote from: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6016

I think it would be really nice if there was an option to create an advanced wallet; a power user feature.
This wallet could not be restored from seed.

It would allow importing xprvs/xpubs: so the user could have multiple of these. Importing could even be allowed for existing wallets (not just in wizard at creation time). These could have differing script types associated with them.

I think even single privkeys/addresses could be allowed to be imported.

Perhaps the user could mark certain paths to be preferred to be given out as receive addresses, and others as preferred change.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 03:00:07 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on Today at 02:00:00 PM

Como eu tenho as 3, uso todas pra dividir o que eu tenho, mas não é muito, mal dá para comprar uma bicicleta Tongue

Ja pensou quanto teria de tivesse feito hold de tudo que ganhou aqui nos fóruns ate hoje?

Acho que essa é uma bao reflexão

Esse tipo de pergunta é tortura.

Mas, se realmente tivesse feito hold de 90%, do que conseguiu desde que entrei no Bitcoin... Enfim, é melhor nem pensar...

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:50:08 AM

Quote from: bitmover on August 24, 2026, 09:13:25 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on August 24, 2026, 08:22:49 AM

Would they have deep enough pockets for this? I can imagine they spent a lot of money on marketing, sales and the actual product, while they didn't sell that many devices. So if all buyers want their money back, they don't have that amount. If the victims want their losses compensated, they won't have that kind of money it either.

I wonder if they will be able to find the users who now hold those 1500 btc. One small mistake when spending, even in a kyc free exchange (like an ip leak), might expose their identities

Tell will tell if someone from coldcard is involved

Well, there are indications that the hacker made a mistake and exposed information about himself. Activities were recognised where the operator used a paid account on a "well-known" blockchain service. A pattern of querying the original addresses was observed during the attack and this was repeated.

https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/19/block-and-galaxy-research-give-lead-to-law-enforcement-in-111m-coldcard-bitcoin-theft/

Now that they already traced the hacker, its good to see what other action they made. Because many people are so curious about this case, they want those people involve in this hacking issue to get captured.

Maybe this is also the reason why the funds stolen has left unmoved? https://crypto.news/coldcard-hackers-leave-87-of-stolen-bitcoin-unmoved-after-114m-theft they are maybe afraid to do transaction because it can create fresh traces to the authorities.

They should act fast, so they can still recover the funds and return it back to those proven victims.

Brief Overview of Pilipinas Local Board- JULY 2026

Date: From 01 July 2026 to 31 July 2026

Total active users in July Month (52):

Legendary	Hero Member	Sr. Member	Full Member	Member	Jr. Member	Newbie
Peanutswar	blockman	Asuspawer09	SatsPH	fighter2627	REDice	Jerusalem12
arwin100	bhadz	tech30338	Bitcoinislife09			Rmun1217
GreatArkansas	coin-investor	fullfitlarry	EXMON			surbetes
cryptoaddictchie	xLays	TypoTonic	demonica
lionheart78	aioc	coinrifft	DEX.fo_off
julerz12	qwertyup23	AicecreaME
PX-Z	bisdak40	bettercrypto
Fredomago	rbynxx	Mr. Magkaisa
robelneo	Finestream
SFR10	Ziskinberg
abel1337	Vaculin
Cointxz	Questat
crwth	BALIK
acroman08	Oasisman
LogitechMouse	gunhell16
GazetaBitcoin
TryNinja
Xal0lex
BitMaxz
bitmover

June month overview

July month overview

Quote

Name	Value
Posts	552
Merits	193
Merit Transactions	163
Users Posted At Least Once	56
Merits Per Post	0.35
Merits Per Transaction	1.18
Merited Posts	81
Unmerited Posts	471
Of Posts Merited	15%

Quote

Name	Value	Changes
Posts	586	+34
Merits	158	-35
Merit Transactions	149	-14
Users Posted At Least Once	55	-1
Merits Per Post	0.27	-0.08
Merits Per Transaction	1.06	-0.12
Merited Posts	88	+7
Unmerited Posts	498	+27
Of Posts Merited	15%	0%

Top 10 Merit Senders (June)

Top 10 Merit Senders (July)

Quote

Rank	Username	Merits
1	cryptoaddictchie	58
2	julerz12	17
3	fullfitlarry	14
4	coinrifft	12
5	Husna QA	10
6	Peanutswar	7
7	fillippone	7
8	joker_josue	6
9	mindrust	5
10	DdmrDdmr	4

Quote

Rank	Username	Merits	Changes
1	cryptoaddictchie	50	-8
2	fighter2627	10	New
3	julerz12	9	-8
4	tech30338	7	New
5	Peanutswar	6	-1
6	coinrifft	5	-7
7	fullfitlarry	5	-9
8	BitMaxz	4	New
9	GreatArkansas	4	New
10	LogitechMouse	4	New

Top 10 Merit Receivers (June)

Top 10 Merit Receivers (July)

Quote

Rank	Username	Merits
1	fullfitlarry	29
2	Peanutswar	21
3	coinrifft	21
4	GreatArkansas	15
5	fighter2627	15
6	arwin100	10
7	cryptoaddictchie	8
8	Finestream	7
9	SatsPH	7
10	julerz12	7

Quote

Rank	Username	Merits	Changes
1	Peanutswar	21	0
2	SatsPH	17	+10
3	GreatArkansas	14	-1
4	fighter2627	13	-2
5	coinrifft	11	-10
6	julerz12	10	+3
7	cryptoaddictchie	8	0
8	arwin100	7	-3
9	SFR10	6	New
10	tech30338	6	New

Top 10 Active Users (June)

Top 10 Active Users (July)

Quote

Rank	Username	Posts
1	Peanutswar	48
2	Asuspawer09	35
3	tech30338	30
4	arwin100	29
5	blockman	27
6	GreatArkansas	27
7	cryptoaddictchie	23
8	Fredomago	22
9	bhadz	22
10	julerz12	21

Quote

Rank	Username	Posts	Changes
1	Peanutswar	41	-7
2	Asuspawer09	37	+2
3	tech30338	37	+7
4	arwin100	30	+1
5	blockman	29	+2
6	GreatArkansas	28	+1
7	bhadz	23	+1
8	cryptoaddictchie	23	0
9	fighter2627	23	New
10	coin-investor	22	0

Top 10 Most Active Topics (June)

Top 10 Most Active Topics (July)

Quote

No.	Topic Title	Started by	Posts
1	cryptoaddictchie personal plea sa local section	cryptoaddictchie	34
2	May prediction sa Kalshi na babagsak ang Bitcoin sa $46k mag bet ka ba?	aioc	30
3	Binenta ko na lahat ng PH Stocks ko para bumili ng Bitcoin!	GreatArkansas	27
4	Mas nahihirapan ba ang mahihirap dahil sa paglaganap ng online casinos?	Kasabus	26
5	Bitcoin market down! Disappointed naba or tuloy parin?	arwin100	25
6	USB crypto-malware. Beware	julerz12	21
7	Blockchain, Hindi Kasama sa Pondo ng COMELEC para sa 2028 Halalan	coinrifft	20
8	Bumagsak ang Bitcoin dahil nagbenta ang Strategy?	Finestream	19
9	Saan pwedeng bumili ng Hardware Wallet sa Pilipinas?	Hashura	17
10	Dapat bang ayusin din ng Pilipinas ang crypto rules gaya ng ginagawa ng Japan?	Finestream	17

Quote

No.	Topic Title	Started by	Posts
1	Bihira ang nagsusuot ng shirt na may Bitcoin logo dahil ba sa $5 wrench attack	aioc	29
2	Di na daw babalik ng $20 si BTC noon? Pero ngayon mas tumaas ng higit pa.	arwin100	26
3	Paraan to avoid FOMO sa crypto	fighter2627	24
4	Trend ng banks ngayon na magwaive ng transaction fee's	tech30338	24
5	Papalayo ba tayo sa Bitcoin adoption dahil sa ginagawa ng government natin?	arwin100	22
6	Electric bill integrate sa blockchain maiwasan kaya ang problema sa bill?	tech30338	22
7	Dapat Yakapin ng Pilipinas ang Crypto	Bitcoinislife09	21
8	Mga mistakes na nagawa natin habang tayo ay nandito sa crypto industry	fighter2627	20
9	Trading or sports betting?	Finestream	20
10	Beware sa mga Crypto Scam	fighter2627	19

Reference:

Inspired by:

[CHARTS] Pilipinas Local Board Statistics (Brief Monthly Overview) by TypoTonic

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 10:40:12 AM

Quote from: Peanutswar on August 15, 2026, 12:14:44 PM

➥ Post Bitcoin price prediction for Aug 29th (once submitted, you cannot edit your post).

Can I delete my previous post and post again? Looks "legal" according to the rules.

If tjhat is ok, here it goes. If not, please disconsider my post.
[...]
$79,258.00

Hello bitmover!

Thanks for being active in our events, apparently once you already made your entry this will considered as a count but our predictions are offered

Quote

➥ Double/Triple prediction if you've already tested the swap and left a comment on kycnot/dex.fo or monerica/dex.fo.

so you can get a lot of chances to spot a good market trend and make your entry predictions Wink

Quote from: bitmover on August 24, 2026, 09:13:25 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on August 24, 2026, 08:22:49 AM

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on August 23, 2026, 11:41:18 PM

I imagine there is likely more than one class action being cooked up.

Would they have deep enough pockets for this? I can imagine they spent a lot of money on marketing, sales and the actual product, while they didn't sell that many devices. So if all buyers want their money back, they don't have that amount. If the victims want their losses compensated, they won't have that kind of money it either.

I wonder if they will be able to find the users who now hold those 1500 btc. One small mistake when spending, even in a kyc free exchange (like an ip leak), might expose their identities

Tell will tell if someone from coldcard is involved

Well, there are indications that the hacker made a mistake and exposed information about himself. Activities were recognised where the operator used a paid account on a "well-known" blockchain service. A pattern of querying the original addresses was observed during the attack and this was repeated.

https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/19/block-and-galaxy-research-give-lead-to-law-enforcement-in-111m-coldcard-bitcoin-theft/

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:09:16 PM

The longest campaign i participate in reddit required posts in an specific subreddit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4236484.msg38445950#msg38445950
BITCORE BTX Reddit Campaign - Full Members+ - Earn $20/Week

Their Reddit became quite active for some time, and we had no problems of accounts suspended.

This was a long time ago, and the rules on Reddit have changed significantly and become stricter. Many things that were allowed before are now not possible.

We will see how the manager and his client imagined this campaign. Such a campaign should certainly be kept behind closed doors

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:02:12 PM

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on August 21, 2026, 10:25:44 PM

One of my client needs a few Reddit users, Please let me know via PM if you are familiar with Reddit and regular there.

Cheers,

I have a 2600 karma account. I might be able to help you but Reddit isnt very firendly to paid posts in big communities.

Reddit is quite restrictive, and every campaign must be very well organised. Maybe that's why it's one of the most popular forums/social networks.
And it's not just that "suspicious" posts will be deleted, but accounts can also be suspended very easily.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 04:09:16 PM

As campanhas sao pagas exclusivamente com dinheiro publico, e a sociedade é proibida de participar do financiamento de partidos ou políticos. Apenas pessoas fisicas podem doar e seguindo regras e limites

Outro dia vi uma galera batendo palma nas redes sociais para um candidato do PSOL que declarou uma bicicleta nos bens.. ai do lado tinha milhões de fundo de campanha Cheesy

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 10:55:48 AM

Eu estou nessa situação e peguei uma nova, mas confesso que acho que não faz grande diferença em segurança.

acho que é mais pra interagir com Defi e outros protocolos smartcontracts que irá fazer diferença.

Eu criei uma nova carteira com uma passphrase forte mas ainda nao movi os fundos. Acho que isso faz difrença.

Aqui eu tenho uma Ledger Nano S + Trezor Safe 3 + Safepal X1

Tenho um pouco em cada carteira, sendo que na Trezor e Safepal criei carteiras adicionais com a passphrase

De resto tenho algumas carteiras com alguns poucos dólares espalhados para usar mais rapidamente como mandar dinheiro para casino, pagar algo, depositar no cartão etc

No momento não tenho mais o que fazer, mas se um dia eu viajar para fora de novo, vejo para comprar uma carteira nova e mais atual
Quem sabe ainda se tiver uma boa oferta na Black Friday dê para comprar uma trezor nova pela Amazon

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 3 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 78,400]} Wink

bitmover - Congratulations on your victory!

💠 Target block - 963579 💠

The winner of this round is bitmover. Congratulations! Wink

Quote from: bitmover on August 22, 2026, 08:38:12 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on August 20, 2026, 12:04:43 PM

...

Eu peguei o de estudante ano passado.

O requisito é un email .Edu
Simplesmente peguei um gerador de email aleatórios e temporários .edu , peguei o código que mandaram no email e pronto, virei estudante pro Google.

Legal, bom saber
Eu estava vendo uma pós graduação na i9, é super barata, e conseguiria além de uma carteirinha de estudante, o direito de ter essas promoções das IAs e ainda Youtube estudante
Se der certo eu compartilho aqui

Eu andei dando uma olhada em algumas soluções para me ajudar no dia a dia, mas é incrível a quantidade de novidades que tem
Fiquei bem perdido, parece que toda semana tem algo novo e todo mundo começa a recomendar, depois quando você pensa em usar já aparecem outras soluções, melhores e cheia de recursos haha

É a bolha das IAs

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on Today at 06:52:57 PM

Let's go with block height 963760

7 - DabsPoorVersion is our winner!

Verify
I will send the address to the management shortly. Once you receive the reward you can share your feedback.

Quote from: Navigation Menu

Event deadline Saturday 23:59 UTC.

RULES

We have now 10 slots! YES, 10 slots only
You must complete a successful order with Priamex from the time this event is live until the deadline time.
The winner takes all!
Last date to book your slot: Saturday 23:59 UTC
Pick a SLOT you like.
You can not edit your entry. If necessary then remove the old entry and make a new one.
We will find the winnersusing Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
Any questions? Ask on the 💰 R7 Bounty Hunters - Telegram Chat
My decisions are final, you must follow the Priamex Terms
You will receive reward directly to your Bitcoin address.

SLOTS

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -

ENTER

Code:

Slot Number:
bech32:
Last two character of the order ID:
Full Order ID: Provide via PM

Accepted slots

Quote from:

R7 Promotions General Disclaimer: We would like to make it clear that R7 Promotions 💹📈 Bitcointalk Campaign Management 💪🔥 Signature & Bounty, managed by Bitcointalk member AB de Royse777, is an independent entity and is not directly affiliated with any of the crypto startups we advertise. While we strive to promote these startups in the best possible light, our views and opinions expressed in our advertising materials do not necessarily reflect those of the startups themselves. We work with various clients across the crypto industry, and our goal is to provide high-quality advertising services to help them achieve their marketing objectives.

Quote from: bitmover on August 18, 2026, 10:45:03 PM

Dai alguem ve essa imagem e fica achando que a trezor ou a ledger sao inseguras, e que o seguro é deixar suas cripto num celular velho, ou rodando moeda, etc.

O problema dessas invenções é que vc uma hora vai esbarrar num problema. Por exemplo, o que vai fazer com 01010010 .... ? Vai colocar num iancoleman.io, mas precisa rodar isso num computador. Agora o metodo ja nao é mais tao off-line como vc imaginou inicialmente. E depois pra gastar? E pra transmitir a assinatura do gasto? Tl

Tudo tem solução , mas sao tantos pontos fracos que no geral 99.99% das pessoas estão melhores com uma hw

Eu também acho que por enquanto as hardware wallets continuam seguras, eu mesmo tenho umas 3 ou 5, vou continuar usando principalmente a Trezor, que é disparada a melhor e mais fácil pra iniciantes e até avançados, se alguma coisa vazar como vazou com a Trezor, o jeito é fazer a sua parte também, como usar emails diferente e exclusivo, com aliases na hora da compra (não resolve quase nada, mas conta), não ficar expondo os bens em redes sociais como é cultura do brasileiro fazer isso pra não ampliar ainda mais o risco sobre você. Acredito que boa parte desses vazamentos é mais prato cheio pra phishing do que um ataque de furadeira ou chave inglesa diretamente.

E lógico, se quiser evitar 100% de ter os dados vazados por quaisquer fabricantes, basta comprar direto de revendas (que ainda não vazaram, mas podem vazar tbm, todas estão propensas a tais riscos), não recomendo comprar em marketplaces por conta de riscos de falsificação / adulteração de firmware, o bom é comprar fisicamente como em eventos ou na europa que eu sei que lá tem bastante loja física que vende.

E também, montar sua própria Krux, que inclusive vai continuar o projeto, pois você compra a peça e a peça em sí não é uma hw, com o firmware baixado do site, você queima e ela passa a ser uma.

Weekly update (2026-08-14_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1786675109 1 5591151.msg67040701 289817 3729214
1786674915 2 5591180.msg67041620 3419471 846936
1786673284 1 5546384.msg67041285 252510 3661617
1786673157 1 5546384.msg67041181 252510 3691552
1786673155 1 5457330.msg62663608 3719408 3486361
1786671732 1 5487753.msg67040244 252510 3750180
1786671654 1 5173493.msg67039636 1174868 3575638
1786671247 1 178336.msg67040877 120694 2755547
1786671216 1 178336.msg67040593 120694 198573
1786668871 5 232519.msg67041145 1068464 3736572
1786668092 1 178336.msg67042135 33156 198573
1786667953 1 178336.msg67042133 198573 33156
1786667944 6 5561071.msg65875208 1554927 314792
1786667884 1 26136.msg67040632 3527653 85033
1786667874 1 5589927.msg67041072 33156 3322606
1786667871 1 5589966.msg67041816 33156 949248
1786666346 1 5224503.msg67041019 2003859 1825672
1786666222 5 5409125.msg67040985 140584 894012
1786666010 1 5224503.msg67040937 537028 2003859
1786665987 1 5590049.msg67007631 1593137 2850161
1786665969 1 5590049.msg67010729 1593137 1107222
1786665965 1 5590049.msg67011024 1593137 1414197
1786665962 1 5590049.msg67014816 1593137 3532447
1786665954 1 5590049.msg67033375 1593137 1414197
1786665949 1 5590049.msg67028414 1593137 2850161
1786665946 1 5590049.msg67017036 1593137 1107222
1786665065 1 5583197.msg66887159 350580 3322606
1786665035 1 5589158.msg67007131 3516832 3508793
1786664958 1 5479271.msg67041897 3528115 2015418
1786664918 1 5479271.msg67038836 3528115 335088
1786664909 1 5479271.msg67038534 3528115 1593137
1786663295 2 5590691.msg67023331 3611603 3283582
1786663180 3 5588819.msg67013080 3611603 3743297
1786662703 2 232519.msg67041794 1634314 2811340
1786662662 1 232519.msg67041330 1634314 350580
1786662484 1 5590834.msg67028491 1247226 1360301
1786662445 1 5590834.msg67030599 1247226 1053119
1786662232 5 5588367.msg66938596 3664701 3698024
1786661556 1 5582628.msg66840235 3723796 1093578
1786661340 1 5588886.msg67041555 97582 317618
1786660704 2 5588886.msg67041555 881377 317618
1786660572 1 5589927.msg67041072 252510 3322606
1786660353 1 5588886.msg67041555 397633 317618
1786660179 1 5224503.msg67041019 317618 1825672
1786659970 2 5588606.msg66946995 407174 3762667
1786659770 1 5590251.msg67007337 949248 1000199
1786659033 1 178336.msg67040480 33156 35501
1786659030 1 178336.msg67040529 33156 120694
1786659028 1 5591154.msg67041206 33156 3570710
1786659025 1 5589075.msg66967398 33156 3254306
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2660 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:38:29 AM CEST, NotFuzzyWarm (history) sent 1 Merit to Supreme Donvic (history) for Re: Cultisms in the society who are to be blame: parents, government or environment .
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:35:15 AM CEST, non fungible anxiety (history) sent 2 Merit to sabotag3x (history) for Tokens de graça no ChatGPT.
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:08:04 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Gost ms (history) for Re: Balancing Financial security and Bitcoin Accumulation .
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:05:57 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to ASloveapg (history) for Re: Balancing Financial security and Bitcoin Accumulation .
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:05:55 AM CEST, TypoTonic (history) sent 1 Merit to PowerGlove (history) for Re: A concise 2FA/TOTP implementation (SMF patch).
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (608 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8877 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 935 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3764227: Zeto Cash (history) earned: 71 Merit.
3764700: rajashek41 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3764752: truedevil (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3765001: nipperk (history) earned: 19 Merit.
3765116: nico01 (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3761774: scoorched
3761866: Otomato
3761923: Korvane.io
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw
3762146: Cinexa
3762178: Bamskki
3762182: Aliikhanii
3762184: xiaoyu1222006
3762229: lattica-core
3762275: DigitalDonkeyBlocks
3762314: apide01
3762360: Midisk
3762413: Ndnx1
3762435: exWhale
3762536: DurakCrypto
3762577: Sowat
3762578: sidrabtc
3762667: Luckiest
3762721: Fire_man
3762738: Prince patrick
3762844: monerica
3762860: PolarCrypto
3762899: Akos26
3763135: Geould
3763168: jaxx.bet
3763191: greysonz
3763248: xxxmourn
3763270: swapsslol
3763276: MegRewards
3763338: omenswap
3763404: Rmun1217
3763459: ohio_jaunt
3763560: paygate-love
3763611: Hazebet.co
3763618: rice_cooker
3763696: Gerdino
3763797: SCORAS
3763826: puzzle_72_worker
3763872: Danish Ali
3763895: Papa_Mojet
3764024: ColdcardVictim
3764049: OLDBOY 003
3764119: IntervalWalker
3764157: MrGambler531
3764227: Zeto Cash
3764700: rajashek41
3764752: truedevil
3765001: nipperk
3765116: nico01

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8877
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:2
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14557:15027
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1494
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3761774:0:1
3761866:0:1
3761923:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1
3762146:1:15
3762178:0:8
3762182:0:1
3762184:0:1
3762229:0:1
3762275:0:2
3762314:0:3
3762360:0:1
3762413:0:1
3762435:0:1
3762536:0:2
3762577:0:1
3762578:0:2
3762667:0:6
3762721:0:1
3762738:0:1
3762844:0:2
3762860:0:32
3762899:0:6
3763135:0:2
3763168:0:1
3763191:0:3
3763248:0:1
3763270:0:1
3763276:0:4
3763338:0:1
3763404:0:3
3763459:0:2
3763560:0:1
3763611:0:1
3763618:0:1
3763696:0:1
3763797:0:15
3763826:0:15
3763872:2:14
3763895:0:1
3764024:40:119
3764049:0:22
3764119:0:1
3764157:0:1
3764227:0:71
3764700:0:2
3764752:0:1
3765001:0:19
3765116:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51686
Sample

Code:

1. 21468 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1121 unique users in 12445 transactions
2. 21297 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 772 unique users in 11633 transactions
3. 18912 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9991 transactions
4. 15628 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8971 transactions
5. 15027 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1230 unique users in 5455 transactions
6. 13868 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 741 unique users in 9127 transactions
7. 13285 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 620 unique users in 4978 transactions
8. 12132 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 505 unique users in 6660 transactions
9. 12085 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 536 unique users in 6187 transactions
10. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
11. 11430 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 618 unique users in 6662 transactions
12. 11374 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6472 transactions
13. 11342 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 588 unique users in 6518 transactions
14. 10654 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 676 unique users in 5744 transactions
15. 10506 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5364 transactions
16. 10442 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 347 unique users in 3801 transactions
17. 10415 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 567 unique users in 4616 transactions
18. 10119 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 543 unique users in 4669 transactions
19. 10112 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 406 unique users in 3518 transactions
20. 10025 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 474 unique users in 5023 transactions
21. 9993 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 462 unique users in 5467 transactions
22. 9303 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 5028 transactions
23. 8967 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 412 unique users in 4631 transactions
24. 8955 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 587 unique users in 5316 transactions
25. 8877 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 413 unique users in 936 transactions
26. 8812 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 458 unique users in 5222 transactions
27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
28. 8249 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 465 unique users in 4526 transactions
29. 7665 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 594 unique users in 4559 transactions
30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
31. 7420 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4246 transactions
32. 7316 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1874 transactions
33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
34. 7071 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 230 unique users in 4033 transactions
35. 6947 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 406 unique users in 3830 transactions
36. 6937 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3527 transactions
37. 6878 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 350 unique users in 3235 transactions
38. 6793 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 494 unique users in 3774 transactions
39. 6791 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3043 transactions
40. 6775 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 959 unique users in 4412 transactions
41. 6711 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 533 unique users in 3878 transactions
42. 6591 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 208 unique users in 3813 transactions
43. 6549 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 433 unique users in 3587 transactions
44. 6493 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 437 unique users in 3796 transactions
45. 6367 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 626 unique users in 3586 transactions
46. 6272 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3495 transactions
47. 6272 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 222 unique users in 3649 transactions
48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
49. 5792 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 460 unique users in 4071 transactions
50. 5772 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2736 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51637. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51638. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51639. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51640. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51641. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51642. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51643. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51644. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51645. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51646. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51647. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51648. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51649. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51650. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51651. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51652. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51653. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51654. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51655. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51656. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51657. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51658. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51659. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51660. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51661. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51662. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51663. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51664. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51665. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51666. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51667. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51668. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51669. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51670. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51671. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51672. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51673. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51674. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51675. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51676. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51677. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51678. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51679. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51680. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51681. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51682. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51683. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51684. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51685. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51686. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26738
Sample

Code:

1. 77452 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 912 unique users in 13120 transactions
2. 72021 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2302 unique users in 31449 transactions
3. 69496 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3353 unique users in 18172 transactions
4. 62829 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3675 unique users in 60585 transactions
5. 60639 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4747 unique users in 34721 transactions
6. 54638 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3804 unique users in 37726 transactions
7. 45699 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2937 unique users in 16177 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 39412 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2547 unique users in 14582 transactions
10. 38350 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2965 unique users in 31060 transactions
11. 36044 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1601 unique users in 14243 transactions
12. 33984 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2217 unique users in 11540 transactions
13. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
14. 32897 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1495 unique users in 10468 transactions
15. 30049 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1467 unique users in 7869 transactions
16. 29539 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1742 unique users in 6902 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
20. 23536 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1393 unique users in 9588 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18490 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1800 unique users in 4155 transactions
23. 17127 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 570 unique users in 8056 transactions
24. 16891 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 754 unique users in 6293 transactions
25. 16791 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1760 unique users in 7679 transactions
26. 16666 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1206 unique users in 9454 transactions
27. 16264 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2009 unique users in 6612 transactions
28. 15384 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 647 unique users in 5513 transactions
29. 15237 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1336 unique users in 8558 transactions
30. 14703 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1696 unique users in 7680 transactions
31. 14557 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1113 unique users in 1790 transactions
32. 14448 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3166 unique users in 7581 transactions
33. 13685 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 667 unique users in 3650 transactions
34. 13561 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5936 transactions
35. 13555 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1366 unique users in 7501 transactions
36. 13541 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1158 unique users in 8287 transactions
37. 13434 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6301 transactions
38. 13422 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 855 unique users in 4321 transactions
39. 12129 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1209 unique users in 6615 transactions
40. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8877 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 591 unique users in 7512 transactions
43. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
44. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
45. 8645 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 764 unique users in 7454 transactions
46. 8635 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1065 unique users in 3737 transactions
47. 8602 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 525 unique users in 6768 transactions
48. 8430 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 333 unique users in 3397 transactions
49. 8271 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 963 unique users in 3607 transactions
50. 8260 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 678 unique users in 2545 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26689. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26690. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26691. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26692. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26693. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26694. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26695. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26696. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26697. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26698. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26699. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26700. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26701. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26702. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26703. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26705. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26706. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26707. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26708. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26709. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26710. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26711. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26712. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26713. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26714. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26715. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26716. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26717. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26718. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26719. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26720. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26721. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26722. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26723. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26724. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26725. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26726. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26727. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26728. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26729. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26730. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26731. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26732. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26733. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26734. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26735. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26736. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26737. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26738. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 342177 (14.39%)
Tuesday 341331 (14.35%)
Wednesday 341301 (14.35%)
Thursday 361733 (15.21%)
Friday 359810 (15.13%)
Saturday 313455 (13.18%)
Sunday 317599 (13.35%)
Total: 2377406

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15027 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 10442 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5696 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11342 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (4) 9993 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6878 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8955 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2222 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2174 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2610 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2179 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1950 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2387 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 13868 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6937 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3896 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4453 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11430 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 12132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (62) 21468 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3152 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 6711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2168 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3934 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1321 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6947 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2027 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2332 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3667 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 13285 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2106 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7665 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11374 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 21297 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3058 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2610 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1610 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1629 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10119 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1637 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 963 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10025 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6493 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
96. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1022 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8877 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Bitz.io - Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casino to Play [Bitz.io] [ANN thread] [Telegram] [X (Twitter)]

Quote

🎰 Bitz.io is a crypto-first online casino and sportsbook that launched in 2023 with a bold, player-focused approach. Bitz, known for its sleek interface and lightning-fast payouts, offers over 4,000 games, including slots, live tables, and sports betting options. Bitz.io is presenting a free raffle for the community.

Prize
1st: $30
2nd: $20
3rd: $15

╔══════

✦ Rules:

   ⚡ You must be a Member to participate.
   ⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
   ⚡ Three winners will share $65 in Bitcoin* The prize has 2x wagering requirement. 1x wagering requirement if you use the tracking link from this thread to sign up..
   ⚡ Reward will be credited to your Bitz.io account.
   ⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
   ⚡ I and Bitz.io reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.

══════╝

✦ Application format:

Code:

Bitz.io Username:
Slot number:

✦ List of participants:

Professionally managed by;

Quote

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 09:59:25 AM

e a subida não para, já temos um ganho de 25% na semana, e o bitcoin passou de 400 mil reais e estamos perto dos 80k!
...

Eu não esperava tanta ação assim até outubro, pensei que Agosto e Setembro seriam bem tranquilos
Senti falta desses dias de acordar e ter notificações que o BTC está subindo, que atingiu uma alta...

Até no X agora o pessoal voltou a ativa, todo mundo animado de novo Cheesy

Meu medo é que nessas subidas tão rápidas assim, pode ter umas correções meio complicadas no caminho

Quote from: Zwei on August 20, 2026, 10:41:03 PM

Quote from: bitmover on August 14, 2026, 06:32:16 PM

But, sometimes if the money is actually good and you see a future in that relationship with the customer, exposing your identity might make sense. Depending on your financial situation as well.

personally speaking, it would be under one condition, only if the other party would expose their identity as well... maybe i won't go as far as to ask them to show me their ID, but full name and a video chat would be a must.

if we are gonna do the "who you are" thing, and make it an official employment relationship, it's got to be a two way street.

I have had many video chats back in the ICO days, I think legitimate companies would have no issues having a conversation with a person via zoom or webcam.

@OP just type something up and submit it. You can look for a template or example on the web and copy the format. You're looking for work and want them to trust you with their money. This isn't 2012 anymore.

Quote from: bitmover on August 14, 2026, 06:32:16 PM

But, sometimes if the money is actually good and you see a future in that relationship with the customer, exposing your identity might make sense. Depending on your financial situation as well.

personally speaking, it would be under one condition, only if the other party would expose their identity as well... maybe i won't go as far as to ask them to show me their ID, but full name and a video chat would be a must.

if we are gonna do the "who you are" thing, and make it an official employment relationship, it's got to be a two way street.

Quote from: #CapsLOck on August 16, 2026, 09:27:52 AM

that de-dollarization doesn't necessarily mean that countries will adopt Bitcoin. That's not to say that the BRICS countries that have opted to reduce dollar dependency and begin using local currencies are taking the plunge into BTC, though. That said, Bitcoin may indirectly benefit, as it is neither tied to any one government and is a neutral asset. It has the major drawbacks of volatility, lack of clarity in regulations, scalability and not being widely used for regular payments. I don't think bitcoin is suitable for replacing national currencies or as a day to day payment system, I believe it's more realistic as a neutral asset and a settlement option for larger transfers.

Fortify has explained it all very well already, and you definitely added good points, CapsLock.

Volatility is a drawback, but really not a major one, because let's say scalability is the issue here, but what I am going to say is going to contradict the utility of it for the countries who want to avoid dollars and use a currency or medium that nobody controls. I recently came to learn that Hal has said:

Quote from: bitmover on August 19, 2026, 04:27:03 PM

Hal Finney also answered that in 2010.

Quote from: Hal on December 30, 2010, 01:38:40 AM

Actually there is a very good reason for Bitcoin-backed banks to exist, issuing their own digital cash currency, redeemable for bitcoins. Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain. There needs to be a secondary level of payment systems which is lighter weight and more efficient. Likewise, the time needed for Bitcoin transactions to finalize will be impractical for medium to large value purchases.

Bitcoin backed banks will solve these problems. They can work like banks did before nationalization of currency. Different banks can have different policies, some more aggressive, some more conservative. Some would be fractional reserve while others may be 100% Bitcoin backed. Interest rates may vary. Cash from some banks may trade at a discount to that from others.

George Selgin has worked out the theory of competitive free banking in detail, and he argues that such a system would be stable, inflation resistant and self-regulating.

I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash. Most Bitcoin transactions will occur between banks, to settle net transfers. Bitcoin transactions by private individuals will be as rare as... well, as Bitcoin based purchases are today.

If people move to 2nd layer solutions if the fee is too expensive, only big transfer between banks/ecchanges and other big players will happen on-chain.

So if Hal really means it, which is a possible and a good assumption at that time, then a central body will be using BTC as backup to create their own currency that won't move on the BTC blockchain. But this way, at least we won't have to suffer from the scalability issues. It can also be widely used for payments as well, but again, it contradicts the feature of freedom.

It didn't take long for another worthy transaction to be recorded. There was also quite some traffic thrown at the Genesis block, mostly dust, roundabout 180ish transaction from the last entry to the table. Some entity was in a generous mood and what a ridiculous feerate was paid for the transaction package, too. Shocked

Past March 14^th, 2025 large^{equal/over 500k sats} transfers to Genesis block descriptor:

Amount in BTC	Confirmed (UTC)	Tx
`0.07167419`	`2026-08-20 05:42:18`	`c19ed7cc5f8431f83c61f6afb868484889d00c207d714bfad06fe3ce2dece44c`
`0.01048815`	`2026-08-15 10:17:51`	`c23595c2a83938adf24b855a7f99ded3146abb049358529546b236e2b1b9d5c4`
`0.00699790`	`2026-08-11 13:04:54`	`4cc6274ba415b6e8097fddf5596e309b841ff21885f829b2588b3af94b242a05`
`0.03300000`	`2026-07-22 14:03:19`	`51b7c5092eb0b8d4075dac25fbabc1dd41a27a7a2ab0f9ab7067aae0a3c636ec`
`0.01810000`	`2026-07-21 04:58:13`	`ff0c039628c8170cabe9761e23d13676fb9e292436e6cef1bb5796837bcfab37`
`0.01810000`	`2026-07-21 02:58:14`	`df6c8668e04460c86ff1d566078264526258cb03b16203e36bfff9d84e60430a`
`0.01810000`	`2026-07-21 01:55:16`	`a6bc116a3974c656fc2b112d5cae184c7457d4d6ac21dffddddaa8d6f426235d`
`0.00534973`	`2026-04-19 20:47:57`	`b6eda301afa0719f98db2329f54309dfdd4ad3550f167b33a651bbce5d5ed0bb`
`0.00500000`	`2026-03-25 14:19:52`	`a538b1e7e4b0eeb661deb7c31db0ad512ffd96044d1fc92c322329b75c7fc9d3`
`0.00700000`	`2026-03-11 10:51:18`	`786b73c9db1e6d831d57ce159204534a47909406677068e91616f31864b683ab`
`2.56536737`	`2026-02-07 00:04:05`	`a73335706adad5c400453fbc3c992f23cacf56b0ca964bc584f5f44ac7e0d412`
`0.02184558`	`2026-01-17 16:39:36`	`8199a72f489f9833989681e0d343ebf28ce44b69bc85cd8a095a147480a7215d`
`0.01400850`	`2026-01-17 15:24:14`	`056ddaa21d7fb5bc587b892b85aef442f00748ecaff1d560661619703f15dce9`
`0.00500000`	`2026-01-14 13:02:36`	`d01a8329f6e8373b3ca5f1cbcd310b8de5f2501fef44e0457f488bb76ab51430`
`0.00545227`	`2025-12-21 12:05:02`	`8c719d92865620a031036ff4fb8be82318337035c3809325c63830d5d7b909bb`
`0.00690000`	`2025-11-17 14:57:06`	`2b38dc88097605a1fc8665c82f1db395393d5b551a5c6857572367dee0d68b96`
`0.00713168`	`2025-11-12 16:59:55`	`98a9447d4e0fecea8a47f5b3dcfad8003db396eeaf3b4be6c400b96b71ab3320`
`0.00500000`	`2025-10-07 09:57:33`	`3c46228ba39b23d8a20e5db73bd5c901bcd3b755bd5a342389f474fbd7c58ea2`
`0.01197173`	`2025-09-29 10:56:34`	`bb5fca631509fbc35a6468f5968c816079d9b87fec6f50b7d6fe8a25190466e1`
`0.04896090`	`2025-09-27 08:38:41`	`877fae4692b985b5635780b1e7f98e04dc4891793b49ab40d82ac411458ceca9`
`0.18413749`	`2025-07-31 04:28:10`	`7bcbabc6f02368fc7ba1b8d239658d80741bbd8543861207c2531ecc0da5bc10`
`0.01015827`	`2025-07-25 13:13:55`	`d6b771a052263fe74140485ea2f3e4d26bedfe7e290e439a8a8fba52add42a7a`
`0.14318933`	`2025-07-21 04:40:18`	`41be08df8445313340e4865cf2f5124b5606eaf807f6582a5c6716d96e9a3027`
`0.15341422`	`2025-07-14 04:26:16`	`8b0ea01018dd85c541a33f2fa086349e6c9913a032c3adc11bed9c21ecb93de5`
`0.33300000`	`2025-07-10 19:29:38`	`fd82374c8ca1f9440e1ffe6999bf919f0c45cbe5aa4d1332e0dd769458219a36`
`0.17165662`	`2025-07-07 04:21:29`	`e4663f4fedbab8c65c69c0d69a4cdfe5e59a7645cce236276ff48d67ec7ffe8d`
`0.00500000`	`2025-07-04 09:08:58`	`c82d355b0ac315a49b0e3144b0e2b060c36f38421eb8d677d0215ac844e2ffae`
`0.00500000`	`2025-06-30 12:35:45`	`4eb3d81a6e52b83bffc90d15091f7983c16c062e791e6b01279db975bf27e61b`
`0.00500000`	`2025-06-30 08:48:51`	`e7314f650a24c78e8397392c47f5938d3e9bda9dc625cedfca421847b6bd6438`
`0.18458032`	`2025-06-30 06:25:38`	`6ba77eb9299e9438ed32261827bc23b8a21a0db2e873f0dfb6b275c26d9ce866`
`0.00921466`	`2025-06-29 09:26:01`	`555006acc092ee2ad53e0de6467f8ce7e3c5177beb71a943a98d7cd52b3c9888`
`0.02673751`	`2025-05-29 12:01:34`	`da77413f13bf77d261dda66b0d1ea26ca2db0c5802cfea96c95d85d1a72a6832`
`0.00615091`	`2025-05-15 19:37:43`	`b1f61c0e64c2c0a9a787d25d4f86d50d0e49f587c736218fc2f04d4eee841add`
`0.00600000`	`2025-04-28 10:08:26`	`adbc26914040cc65e24defb69f9b4442bbd6a2264cf1e25a601cce950ba6a8e0`
`0.00500000`	`2025-04-07 07:25:18`	`8644fc777d52e8e850ecc192cfaa246805e31bc763d84a055244872bf4dcb711`

Current balance at time of this post according to combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50BTC of coinbase tx: 107.44012671BTC (includes pending 6274sats waiting for confirmation, the difference (0.07315055BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).

This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptor^{see below} accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).

Code:

combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 06:45:36 PM

Como que funciona esse programa de recompensa pra criador de conteudos?
Me parece bastante lucrativo, mesmo para quem nao fraude o sistema com muitas contas.

Voce tem o link.?

Eles estão mudando esse sistema.. até agora eles pagavam qualquer pessoa (podia copiar conteúdos).. mas a partir de setembro, se não me engano, vai ser só para criadores de conteúdos originais.. mas era basicamente assinar aquele selo azul, bater uma quantia mínima de views e ter um mínimo de seguidores verificados.

Esse é o novo modelo que estão implementando: https://x.com/XCreators/status/2085835082166653393

Não sei quantos seguidores esse cara ai tinha.. a conta principal dele já foi deletada (as outras também).. pesquisei agora e parece que tinha 270k seguidores e 27 mil posts na principal.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 05:11:57 PM

Here in the post . He mentions a 50% flawed dice , but looks solid still

It only looks and is solid till it is compromised, and I only want to try with dice method without flaws.

Quote

I think the point is that the attacker doesn't know that your seed used a flawed dice, and which number is repeating.

The problem is when you created a wallet with a flawed method used by thousands of people and the flaws are known (like coldcard)

That's true but it also says about a fact that is not comfortable at all because non technical people only can trust technical guys, companies, manufacturers about security and quality of a wallet.

Like I trust Bitcoin Core, trust Electrum because they are very old wallet brands and people technically reviewed those wallets as top notch. I don't know how to do technical things, code reviews and I have no other choice than trusting them while they all can make mistakes from developments, QA/QC to community reviews.

It's stressful during this AI era.

Quote from: bitmover on August 18, 2026, 01:05:19 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on January 02, 2026, 10:52:59 AM

...

Hey, tell us how and why did Jumper gave you this wallet.

Did you had a lot of referrals? high volume? One of the oldest users of jumper?

I used jumper a few times, as your suggestion, and it is quite good and cheap

No referals hehe
I used Jumper a lot since jan 2024 and they have a level system, so I earned points doing trades, volume, different networks...
And they made a partnership with Safepal, I earned a X1 model, I only had to pay the taxes and shipping (not expensive)
They have another advantages, like discounts, free e-sims etc, it's a nice reward

I still use jumper, it's a good service, glad that you liked

Quote from: bitmover on August 19, 2026, 04:27:03 PM

Hal Finney also answered that in 2010.

This question is not new and it has been asked and answered many times so far.
What will happen to Bitcoin after all 21 millions are mined?
People did not do their searching for finding available questions and answers, mostly like that, or they did not satisfy with available answers because the future is uncertain, that is true, and many things will change with time for Bitcoin, its development and adoption as well as how Bitcoin miners will get rewards from mining.

Quote

If people move to 2nd layer solutions if the fee is too expensive, only big transfer between banks/ecchanges and other big players will happen on-chain.

If anyone are interested in 2nd layer solutions, they can follow up this thread.
Sidechain Observer - Bitcoin L2 Projects & current state of development.

Quote from: bitmover on August 19, 2026, 10:20:00 PM

Not long ago, in 2021, binance was a completely free kyc exchange for withdrawals up to 2 btc per Day.

You could just create a throw away email, send 2 btc (20k usd at the time) and withdrawal instantly without any kyc.

Good old times Grin

Those days are gone and those were some really good days for crypto users especially for crypto traders/investors who could easily buy/sell Bitcoin without following the KYC procedure and those days there was no issues related to AML either, but now things are quite different in the market. In current times we're still lucky that we have exchanges like DEX.fo that help us to swap our Bitcoin to other coins without the KYC procedure. These days almost majority if not all traditional CEXs like Binance want KYC details of users because allowing them to withdraw Bitcoin or other crypto currencies so in current days no KYC exchanges are saviors of privacy enthusiasts who don't want to reveal their details to exchanges but still need to swap their one coin to another coin.