bitmover's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned bitmover in the past 7 days

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (61) 14654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 10005 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11183 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4721 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6756 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6259 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2557 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2165 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (13) 6651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1933 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2377 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13723 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6266 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10245 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 744 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4418 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3956 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2836 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4598 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (66) 21249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3111 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10130 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1394 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2017 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3858 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3594 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6800 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1961 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2309 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4617 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15601 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3576 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +87 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (38) 12908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2348 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 9931 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11371 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4215 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3442 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 20973 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2938 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2564 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2597 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5719 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1605 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +49 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1524 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1594 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9934 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6440 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1287 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3560 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7207 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1010 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8773 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 13813: smooth (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: BitMaxz on July 16, 2026, 11:54:32 PM

I believe this is simply their way of expanding their business to other countries because we have different jurisdictions. If KYC is required in your country where you live, you have the option of providing it just to pass the AML policies.

As Tryninja mentioned earlier, you can easily bypass them since Uniswap seems to be giving you two options if you want to share your data or not.

Yes, this Hook KYC feature is for LPs. If someone has a liquidity pool and they have used the Hook feature, then anyone who wants to swap from that pool has to get the KYC NFT first. If their wallet has none, then they will not be able to trade.

The LPs are still modular. You can trade in any pool you want, but confirm before swapping if you are swapping in a Hooked one or a free one where they won't check the NFT automatically. It is a basic smart contract feature that runs automatically, so I don't think Bitmover has to rush into selling his ETH just because of this tool.

But it has proved one thing. Centralization is really getting to where we once used to say it would.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:52:22 PM

Acho que sonegar vai ficar cada vez mais dif�cil daqui pra frente. Vamos viver um futuro de vigil�ncia total do Estado, principalmente em republiquetas de banana como a nossa, onde os direitos individuais s�o mal vistos.

Isso acaba por ser um ciclo vicioso.

A malta sonega, porque n�o concorda com os impostos.
Os governos aumentam o controlo e por sua vez os impostos.
A malta arranja novos esquemas para continuar a sonegar.
Os governos criam mais regras para tentar combater.
Etc...

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 09:49:34 AM

Quote from: joker_josue on July 16, 2026, 06:50:20 AM

Acham que v�o salvar o "mundo". Roll Eyes

Eles querem � se salvar

Depois que eu soube que o Luke foi hackeado e perdeu todas as suas moedas, deixei de levar a s�rio essa empreitada... ele est� s� querendo recuperar o que perdeu.

E se essa n�o resultar, vai fazer como o outro e dizer que � o Satoshi... Roll Eyes

Quote from: bitmover on July 16, 2026, 11:59:28 AM

Quote from: zasad@ on July 16, 2026, 11:04:19 AM

Decentralized exchanges like Uniswap have already introduced KYC capabilities in Uniswap v4.
This is implemented via the "Hooks" mechanism, allowing a developer to create a liquidity pool and attach a "KYC hook" to it. This hook checks whether the user holds a specific KYC-NFT verification token in their wallet - a token obtained after completing the KYC process through a third-party service. I haven't encountered this in practice yet, but it will likely be implemented soon.

This is an important information. Thanks for sharing.
Do you have more details about it? I use it a lot and always co sidered kyc free. I was going to use it in the future to dump my remaining eth. Not anymore I guess Grin

You don't need to worry about KYC on Uniswap right now. All pools on the Uniswap v1-3 protocol operate without KYC.
You can also use a bridge
https://app.rango.exchange/
But you should use caution with your main wallets. I use intermediate wallets for bridges.

Quote from: okorieemmanuel on June 21, 2026, 04:31:09 PM

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on June 07, 2026, 09:48:30 PM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on June 06, 2026, 04:32:04 PM

Quote from: bitmover on June 06, 2026, 08:27:25 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on June 06, 2026, 05:52:18 AM

Quote from: bitmover on June 05, 2026, 05:42:43 PM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on June 05, 2026, 07:40:00 AM

Although you "may" be right, BUT currently, Bitcoin's Four-Year-Cycle is STILL INTACT. Why make decisions because you "believe" that you're absolutely right and the market is wrong, or you "feel" that something different is going to happen?

That's how "investors" lose their precious capital.

Cylces are not "intact".
We had for the first time an ATH before the halving. The bear market started earlier than expected (in October).

A MINOR difference of one or two months does NOT make the Cycle broken. I would be the first person to say that the Cycle is broken IF the bear market continues throughout Q2/Q3 2027, OR if a surge to another All Time High happens this year.

In the current state of the Cycle, we might see the actual bottom in October or November.

That is a minor difference looking backwards.

If you are expecting the price to continue to grow for 4 more months and it collapses before that, you lose money. That is what happened last cycle

We have a saying in Brazil for this:
All the winning numbers of a winning lottery ticket looks easy on Monday Cheesy

I'm not actually sure what "narrative" you're trying to tell me. But you do you. Because from looking at this zoomed out chart, it FACTUALLY shows that Bitcoin's Four-Year-Cycle is still intact.

It's NOT even debatable.

�\_(ツ)_/�

If we boil it down to a binary reality. And we do not define the parameters of the cycle too tightly.

But it is seemingly changing. At least amplitude. And we do not really have enough data for THIS cycle to be conclusive IMHO. Not to mention that the sample size for the whole thing is 3.75.

Would you agree that for the cycle to be still valid we will need a bigger capitulation than we have seen so far? Your image does not show that red box.

I HAVE to admit I am quite surprised it has seemingly held on this long. I thought the institutional analysts would have it figured out and somehow counter trade it which would cause it to begin to disappear.

I also would think the effects of institutional shenanigans would overshadow anything the actual cycle forces could muster. And indeed that may be part of what is damping the amplitude...

Thank God you mentioned that this data is not complete. Else your predictions may be scary for me decipher without being sentimental. Let's add all the facts first before throwing figures on the table please.

The data is not complete because it's still being made through the completion of the Bear Cycle, which if the Four-Year-Cycle is still intact, then "the bottom" will be in October/November, 2026. IF it's NOT intact, then probably the bottom already happened OR we'll probably experience a longer Bear Cycle and lower bottom than what we'll see in October/November, no?

�\_(ツ)_/�

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:00:49 AM

But I am not sure if for the fact that I use cloudflare i should inform the users that cloudflare might be collecting their data

If you're only using Cloudflare's basic features, such as a CDN service or CSRF protection, without advanced traffic/user analysis capabilities, then it's not necessary either.

This is usually only required if: you use Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Google AdSense, or other similar tools. Or if you have cookies or collect data for analytics, advertising, personalization, or tracking.

If you don't do any of the things I mentioned above, you don't need any banner of this kind.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:59:28 AM

Quote from: bitmover on July 15, 2026, 09:18:21 PM

Maybe you need to use more AI. It really helps in everything.

I am sorry but I really do not feel any excitement at all about the idea of having a Google-on-steroids as my search engine that collects every thing I prompt, think, search for et cetera exploiting the use of that information to the highest point possible.

Quote from: bitmover on July 15, 2026, 09:18:21 PM

Basically all software and websites are written with AI help (or entirely written by AI).
Scientists are using it in their researches.

And to me that is very concerning. We are stupidifying our selves on a faster pace than ever. After TikTok, AI and what ever comes next, humanity may really reach the Idiocracy level of brain dead.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:59:28 AM

Here is an official link from Uniswap with some more information about Hooks in general:
https://developers.uniswap.org/docs/protocols/v4/concepts/hooks

An article I found says pretty much the same as zasad@ did. The KYC hook is an optional feature. Liquidity providers can choose to use it or not. For example, if laws in certain jurisdictions require them to perform KYC, they can do that.

Weekly update (2026-07-10_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1783651823 2 4657305.msg66925025 1724800 1041310
1783651420 1 5583520.msg66924272 1237156 7811
1783650362 1 5587999.msg66925364 3570710 1045971
1783649438 1 5579256.msg66925155 3752555 1190631
1783648143 1 178336.msg66923967 252510 198573
1783648035 1 178336.msg66923919 252510 1634314
1783647622 1 178336.msg66923656 252510 533583
1783647479 1 5587136.msg66923796 1269701 221727
1783647466 1 178336.msg66923627 252510 33156
1783647378 1 178336.msg66923399 252510 963784
1783646594 1 5587805.msg66921623 995810 3434176
1783646583 1 5587805.msg66921475 995810 2004043
1783646462 1 178336.msg66923177 252510 64507
1783646346 1 178336.msg66923148 252510 33156
1783646305 1 178336.msg66922880 252510 2755547
1783646154 1 178336.msg66922707 252510 2755547
1783645783 1 178336.msg66922590 252510 1634314
1783644676 1 5376945.msg66925568 252510 3724979
1783644195 1 5587709.msg66918765 1593137 753396
1783642731 1 5445282.msg66924550 1554927 97582
1783642227 1 5587703.msg66925507 3442536 137185
1783642040 1 5376945.msg66924564 252510 3752453
1783641608 1 5376945.msg66924386 252510 3367218
1783641526 1 5376945.msg66924171 252510 3525056
1783641131 1 5376945.msg66924068 252510 3670744
1783641085 1 5376945.msg66924040 252510 3733747
1783641043 1 5376945.msg66923992 252510 3570979
1783640441 1 5451044.msg66905679 1827294 392207
1783639302 1 5376945.msg66923590 252510 3614991
1783638645 1 5376945.msg66923542 252510 3508007
1783638386 1 5549699.msg66330731 3559419 3607450
1783638327 1 5587824.msg66918353 3559419 3534730
1783637475 2 5587999.msg66924985 1045971 3663803
1783637353 1 5479271.msg66925250 3528115 2015418
1783637342 1 5479271.msg66925092 3528115 1593137
1783636885 1 5587786.msg66924407 97582 1031572
1783636367 1 5538211.msg66922496 941526 112493
1783636280 2 5587991.msg66924881 184231 317618
1783636240 2 5587991.msg66924902 184231 163641
1783636079 1 5376945.msg66923381 252510 3732496
1783635719 1 232519.msg66924601 2872248 3594134
1783635680 3 5587864.msg66919604 407174 3761530
1783635123 5 5544695.msg65425359 113670 3082389
1783635115 1 5544695.msg66522282 113670 857604
1783635061 1 5544695.msg66923645 113670 857604
1783634986 1 5587575.msg66913976 407174 1365271
1783633131 1 5587312.msg66924662 3639584 149135
1783632882 2 5451159.msg66922957 407174 2654005
1783632697 1 4850385.msg66914397 407174 2843153
1783632363 3 5587954.msg66922802 407174 366632
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2319 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:50:23 AM CEST, Lakai01 (history) sent 2 Merit to Unknown01 (history) for Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... .
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:43:40 AM CEST, nc50lc (history) sent 1 Merit to goatpig (history) for Re: 0.97 RC1.
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:26:02 AM CEST, promise444c5 (history) sent 1 Merit to igehhh (history) for Re: OKX is back in Nigeria .
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:10:38 AM CEST, KycNotList (history) sent 1 Merit to JeromeTash (history) for Re: 🔎 [ANN] KycNotList.com � No KYC / No AML Crypto Exchange Monitor.
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 03:49:03 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Hueristic (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (602 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8773 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 935 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3761538: Benedesuuuk (history) earned: 9 Merit.
3761676: Lytvynets1 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3761774: scoorched (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner) (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3761992: Diceftw (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3758666: ChrisOfTheOT
3758716: abdulcelildibo
3758816: WurstTrader
3758829: options4good
3758929: SubGenius.Finance
3758969: Ghostswap.io
3759033: Fash33
3759071: standardnepo
3759079: Parveziqbal123
3759272: WhatareYou
3759370: ArkonSwap
3759379: Crypto gbeegbe
3759389: Antidote47k
3759454: Nwaswago
3759482: Ribust
3759517: satsinesat
3759555: DroidDesk
3759560: hellowaza
3759674: VarJames
3759725: godisreal
3759766: KingVesting
3759808: Kannibal Hektor
3760211: 0xHashRaptor
3760228: lll555
3760243: proofra
3760275: Neha2399
3760276: DragonBites
3760305: redtrusts
3760506: smf24
3760625: gijane
3760686: legendo
3760707: aodrbxo
3760791: swedoc
3760817: lastpixellive
3760902: borrowonbitcoin
3760961: Ethereum1
3761001: buffetto
3761071: Droppies
3761141: paidfully
3761153: mickpaoli
3761170: Soulistic
3761237: IsItMiCACompliant
3761238: xmrbro
3761348: Gmax98005
3761530: Priamex.com
3761538: Benedesuuuk
3761676: Lytvynets1
3761774: scoorched
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8773
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:1
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14428:14654
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1491
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3758666:0:1
3758716:0:1
3758816:0:1
3758829:0:1
3758929:0:1
3758969:1:3
3759033:0:3
3759071:3:7
3759079:0:1
3759272:0:2
3759370:0:1
3759379:0:1
3759389:0:9
3759454:0:1
3759482:4:19
3759517:0:2
3759555:0:1
3759560:0:2
3759674:0:3
3759725:0:1
3759766:0:4
3759808:9:37
3760211:0:4
3760228:0:1
3760243:0:5
3760275:0:2
3760276:0:2
3760305:0:3
3760506:0:1
3760625:0:1
3760686:0:2
3760707:0:3
3760791:0:1
3760817:0:5
3760902:0:3
3760961:0:2
3761001:0:2
3761071:0:1
3761141:0:1
3761153:0:1
3761170:1:4
3761237:0:3
3761238:0:4
3761348:0:1
3761530:0:4
3761538:0:9
3761676:0:2
3761774:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51574
Sample

Code:

1. 21249 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1116 unique users in 12300 transactions
2. 20973 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 764 unique users in 11486 transactions
3. 18897 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9988 transactions
4. 15601 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8956 transactions
5. 14654 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1225 unique users in 5304 transactions
6. 13723 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 731 unique users in 9043 transactions
7. 12908 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 604 unique users in 4843 transactions
8. 11978 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 500 unique users in 6598 transactions
9. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
10. 11789 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 527 unique users in 6068 transactions
11. 11371 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6470 transactions
12. 11365 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 611 unique users in 6611 transactions
13. 11183 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 587 unique users in 6438 transactions
14. 10376 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5308 transactions
15. 10245 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 659 unique users in 5548 transactions
16. 10130 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 558 unique users in 4520 transactions
17. 10005 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 341 unique users in 3675 transactions
18. 9934 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 469 unique users in 4972 transactions
19. 9931 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 402 unique users in 3457 transactions
20. 9867 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 453 unique users in 5393 transactions
21. 9862 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 534 unique users in 4544 transactions
22. 9186 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 4966 transactions
23. 8898 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 410 unique users in 4587 transactions
24. 8849 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 584 unique users in 5235 transactions
25. 8773 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 411 unique users in 930 transactions
26. 8755 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 456 unique users in 5188 transactions
27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
28. 8150 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 460 unique users in 4467 transactions
29. 7615 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 592 unique users in 4514 transactions
30. 7613 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4137 transactions
31. 7238 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4170 transactions
32. 7207 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 234 unique users in 1853 transactions
33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
34. 6885 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3488 transactions
35. 6881 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 229 unique users in 3939 transactions
36. 6800 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 398 unique users in 3736 transactions
37. 6756 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 345 unique users in 3167 transactions
38. 6755 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3037 transactions
39. 6723 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 955 unique users in 4373 transactions
40. 6651 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 487 unique users in 3694 transactions
41. 6590 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 529 unique users in 3811 transactions
42. 6451 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 429 unique users in 3529 transactions
43. 6440 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 435 unique users in 3762 transactions
44. 6425 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 206 unique users in 3716 transactions
45. 6361 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 625 unique users in 3580 transactions
46. 6266 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 461 unique users in 3490 transactions
47. 6259 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3640 transactions
48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
49. 5747 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2723 transactions
50. 5719 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 458 unique users in 4018 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51525. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51526. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51527. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51528. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51529. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51530. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51531. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51532. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51533. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51534. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51535. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51536. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51537. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51538. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51539. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51540. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51541. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51542. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51543. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51544. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51545. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51546. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51547. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51548. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51549. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51550. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51551. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51552. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51553. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51554. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51555. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51556. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51557. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51558. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51559. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51560. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51561. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51562. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51563. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51564. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51565. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51566. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51567. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51568. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51569. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51570. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51571. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51572. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51573. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51574. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26704
Sample

Code:

1. 76324 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 909 unique users in 13018 transactions
2. 71451 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2294 unique users in 31288 transactions
3. 68773 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3345 unique users in 18007 transactions
4. 61962 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3648 unique users in 59726 transactions
5. 60127 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4722 unique users in 34432 transactions
6. 53377 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3768 unique users in 36778 transactions
7. 45232 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2918 unique users in 16014 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38792 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2540 unique users in 14447 transactions
10. 38321 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2964 unique users in 31046 transactions
11. 35648 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1597 unique users in 14164 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 33037 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2192 unique users in 11324 transactions
14. 32774 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1490 unique users in 10447 transactions
15. 29777 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1460 unique users in 7781 transactions
16. 29202 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1729 unique users in 6836 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
20. 23224 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1382 unique users in 9530 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18027 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1770 unique users in 4070 transactions
23. 16955 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 568 unique users in 7967 transactions
24. 16781 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 753 unique users in 6231 transactions
25. 16515 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1748 unique users in 7569 transactions
26. 16274 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1201 unique users in 9324 transactions
27. 16240 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2004 unique users in 6602 transactions
28. 15275 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5489 transactions
29. 15056 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1331 unique users in 8470 transactions
30. 14561 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1689 unique users in 7614 transactions
31. 14428 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1107 unique users in 1766 transactions
32. 14365 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3162 unique users in 7556 transactions
33. 13571 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 663 unique users in 3635 transactions
34. 13421 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1151 unique users in 8206 transactions
35. 13393 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5907 transactions
36. 13372 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1354 unique users in 7420 transactions
37. 13366 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6273 transactions
38. 13204 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 848 unique users in 4295 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11888 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1193 unique users in 6509 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8606 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 585 unique users in 7331 transactions
45. 8547 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1063 unique users in 3708 transactions
46. 8532 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 757 unique users in 7392 transactions
47. 8368 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 332 unique users in 3370 transactions
48. 8364 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 522 unique users in 6616 transactions
49. 8204 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 958 unique users in 3580 transactions
50. 7953 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 667 unique users in 2476 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26655. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26656. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26657. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26658. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26659. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26660. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26661. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26662. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26663. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26664. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26665. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26666. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26667. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26668. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26669. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26670. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26671. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26672. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26673. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26674. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26675. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26676. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26677. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26678. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26679. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26680. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26681. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26682. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26683. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26684. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26685. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26686. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26687. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26688. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26689. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26690. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26691. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26692. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26693. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26694. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26695. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26696. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26697. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26698. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26699. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26700. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26701. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26702. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26703. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 338473 (14.38%)
Tuesday 338172 (14.36%)
Wednesday 337826 (14.35%)
Thursday 358516 (15.23%)
Friday 355997 (15.12%)
Saturday 310214 (13.18%)
Sunday 314372 (13.35%)
Total: 2353570

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: criptoevangelista on July 15, 2026, 03:00:42 PM

... com 100 mil reais na conta, eu manteria em um CDB, ganhando mil e pouquinho por m�s sem fazer nada e esperando o momento certo.
...

Acho que ele j� tem em CDB

Quote from: sabotag3x on July 15, 2026, 04:01:25 PM

Dif�cil ein.. depois o mercado cai e ele coloca a culpa em voc� Cheesy

Bitcoin parece estar bem pr�ximo do seu fundo, seria um bom momento para entrar de cabe�a...

Eu j� deixei bem claro Cheesy

Acho que se fosse eu nesse exato momento eu investiria metade no BTC, um pouco em altcoin e ia fazendo um DCA de leve
Pra quem j� est� h� mais tempo acostumado com BTC, acho que fica mais tranquilo de pesar a m�o

Quote from: Forsyth Jones on July 15, 2026, 05:41:25 PM

...
Eu faria da seguinte forma (meio por cima): Faria DCA no Bitcoin e talvez uma compra grande se eu achar que o pre�o esta no fundo do po�o, como estar abaixo da EMA de 200 ou com o RSI semanal ou mensal bem sobrevendido (quase sempre que isso acontece, o pre�o tende a ter uma subida forte que pode durar de 6 meses ou reverter completamente pro bull market), a compra grande seria em torno de 10k - 20k.
...

Pra quem sabe o que est� fazendo � mais tranquilo, mas acho que n�o tenho coragem de indicar alavancagem para um conhecido que n�o entende muito de cripto, � bastante arriscado na minha opini�o

Quote from: joker_josue on July 15, 2026, 06:00:53 PM

Se foi ele que perguntou como investir em cripto, e n�o foi voc� que sugeriu fazer, ent�o acho que � mais tranquilo.

Exatamente joker, � um conhecido bem tranquilo, eu expliquei dos riscos e que n�o h� garantia alguma, mas ele mesmo demonstrou interesse, n�o precisei convencer de nada hahaha

Quote from: bitmover on July 15, 2026, 08:19:55 PM

...
Eu iria 100% de bitcoin.

Voce pode sugerir fazer dca... mas sera que agoea nao � uma boa hora pra pesar a mao?

Como disse o sabotag3x, eu, se fosse eu, acho que seria boa hora de pesar a m�o e deixar quietinho esperando uma ATH nova, quem sabe (se chegar a aATH novamente �bvio)
Mas fico meio assim de indicar para algu�m novato em cripto

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 10:54:58 AM

SimpleX is the most appropriate and private way of communication that I know of, and it is used by a lot of crypto users...

I know some good projects that uses or used it in the past.

Sounds like a good idea. I'll do this.

I'm also going to scan Bits.media forum and check for any good services that don't have a presence here.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:21:52 PM

Quote from: joker_josue on July 15, 2026, 05:46:13 PM

It doesn't work quite like that. This is almost a myth, which leads dozens of websites to have this type of banner, even when it is not necessary.

If a website does not automatically access user cookie information, nor track activity, nor store user analytics data, then this type of banner is unnecessary.

EU bureaucracy is heavy shit. I have seen so many illogical, myth-driven decisions that nothing surprises me. Inserting a few lines of text disclaiming responsibility is not a big deal if it can be considered in accordance with the regulations.

I understand. But in this case, if there really is no tracking, you're unlikely to have any problems.

I would even say that it could create the wrong idea in the project, having that kind of message. Visitors might get the impression that the site is tracking people when it isn't. That's even worse.

Not to mention how annoying this type of banner is, as it serves zero purpose.

In this specific case, I think Bitmover can rest assured that it won't have any problems because it doesn't have that banner, as long as it doesn't do any tracking.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 10:30:54 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:06:41 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:55:04 AM

Not all but most of them are. bitmover gave a few examples of the opposite.

People get confused because we have been programmed to divide crypto exchanges into two categories: they are either centralized or decentralized. When people hear Binance, KuCoin, etc., they will never make a mistake in which group those brands belong to. Chances are that they have also had some experience using such platforms. Instant swap platforms work differently. You don't get those traditional accounts you see on CEXs, so people get confused and wrongly believe that they must therefore belong to the decentralized group of exchanges.

I think most people associate it with the fact whether registration is mandatory or not, custodial or non-custodial, whether they can use the exchange wallet as a regular wallet (which is completely wrong). For example, no one will give a CCE.Cash deposit address to receive a signature payout.

For Binance, Kucoin, and the like, I would rather say they are trading platforms

Yeah, in the end with have decentralized exchanges which are not instant, such as Bisq (maybe hyperliquid, if you consider it decentralized). These exchanges are similar to traditional exchanges, with depoiti/withdrawls, etc

And also decentralized instant exchanges, like the ones I mentioned earlier (uniswap, jupiter, sushiswap..)

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:55:04 AM

For Binance, Kucoin, and the like, I would rather say they are trading platforms

@Ultegra134

You captured the actual issue perfectly � the first automated acknowledgment ("we got your message, working on it") does more for user experience than a fast final answer with no interim response. Silence during waiting is what generates panic, not the wait itself. We're looking at automating that first-touch acknowledgment so it lands consistently regardless of team load. Thanks for continuing to push on this.

Also � appreciate the second review below. Chain mode running smoothly under load is exactly what we design for. Fast mode availability for USDT-BTC depends on reserves in the moment; when Fast is back consistently across all pairs, that limitation goes away. Working on it.

@hosemary

On the on-chain proof-of-reserves � you're right, at our scale it's genuinely hard to implement cleanly. The moment we publish a set of addresses claiming "this is our reserves," we've published targeting information plus the aforementioned honeypot risk. Services that do full on-chain proof-of-reserves usually either aggregate into fewer wallets (concentrating risk) or use zero-knowledge proofs (which are technically expensive to set up and verify). Both are on the horizon for our roadmap but not something we can flip on this quarter.

The trade-off in the meantime � forum escrow + PGP-signed guarantees from independent parties + operational track record over time. Not perfect, but a reasonable stack.

@MarryWithBTC

Fair take across the board. The prize scaling from $30 to $50 to $100 mirrors the thread's activity growth honestly � more engagement, better contests. Credit to Peanutswar for driving that consistently.

On the escrow suggestion � Tr�void's response below covers the practical side. Their escrow is a limited-capacity arrangement they extend selectively, not a service they scale up. That's actually a feature, not a bug: if they took on every request, the guarantee would mean less. We're grateful they extended it to us; adding more services would dilute what makes their word carry weight.

@bitmover

Well-summarized on the Exploit escrow dynamic � it's basically the forum administration acting as a trusted third party specifically because their reputation is worth far more than the escrow itself. Skin in the game at multiple layers.

On PGP-signed statements as a general reputation feature on sites � noted. Something we can look at implementing on our /reputation page: rotating PGP-signed status updates that any user can verify with our public key. Would make ongoing status claims (like "site status normal," "no outstanding disputes," etc.) independently verifiable rather than just published text.

@hosemary (post 361)

Both points are constructive and both are on our list. The OP does need refreshing � the asset list is outdated (still shows DAI which we removed), and there's no compact summary of the discussion topics that keep repeating. We'll batch these updates:

� Updated coin list: BTC, ETH, XMR, LTC, USDT, USDC
� Escrow summary (1 BTC on Exploit.in + 6.2 XMR via Tr�void)
� PGP infrastructure (support signing + per-order signing)
� Refund address explanation with the "same coin you send FROM" framing
� Chain vs Fast mode mechanics
� Coming soon: Solana, BSC/BNB
� FAQ links for the most-repeated questions

The idea is exactly what you said � new users read the OP first and if it's comprehensive, they don't need to trawl 20+ pages to find answers already given. Should reduce the repetitive questions and let the thread focus on actual new discussion.

@MarryWithBTC (post 362)

"Set reminder, don't miss unless the operator says no" 😅 � sound approach.

@Tr�void

Fully understand the position. Extending guarantees is a limited resource that only carries weight because it's used carefully. We appreciate the trust you extended to us � and respect the boundary you keep for it. Both matter.

@dwyane36

Understood on the exotic/underserved pair interest. RUNE-BTC and similar emerging Layer 1 pairs are interesting from a demand standpoint, but the liquidity constraints on smaller L1 assets make them tricky to route reliably in Chain mode without wide spreads. We evaluate them individually as their liquidity ecosystem matures.

The general logic � we'll add pairs when we can offer them cleanly (reasonable spread, reliable settlement, no dead-ends on refund). Not just when they're asked for. Better to say "not yet" than to add a pair that quietly fails 30% of the time.

@AnybodyElse

Thanks for the swap report and the honest $150 first test � 27 minutes on Chain mode USDT (ERC-20) → BTC is a solid result. Glad the experience landed well.

On Fast mode for USDT → BTC specifically � it comes and goes depending on our BTC reserves at that specific moment. When Fast is available for that pair, the swap is instant post-confirmation. Right now Fast is in a broader rework to make it consistent across pairs � when that lands, "sometimes available, sometimes not" won't be the answer anymore.

@Ultegra134 (post 366)

Fair on the status messaging inside the UI during longer swaps � this ties directly to the point in your earlier post. A "currently routing through liquidity pool, expected 15-20 min remaining" indicator (or similar) during longer flows would help users understand what's happening instead of just watching a spinner. Adding to the UX list along with the refund field improvements.

Thanks again for the multi-angle feedback � you're pointing at real friction, not hypothetical.

DEX.fo � No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Quote from: examplens on July 15, 2026, 09:53:02 AM

I would also add that all instant exchanges are also centralized platforms. I don't know why many confuse that.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:48:20 AM

Quem vota s�o os miners, tem que ver o posicionamento das pools, n�o dos influencers do twitter Cheesy

Seguidor nessa hora n�o vale nada, tem que ver o hashrate.

O Saylor tb n�o saberia dizer da relev�ncia, assim como da blackrock. N�o � proof of stake rsrs

Minerador vai apontar o hashrate para onde estiver o dinheiro, tanto faz se for BTC, BCH ou "Bitcoin Knots" (sei l� o nome que v�o dar pra essa moeda, caso surgir).. no fim quem manda � o mercado.. que � influenciado.. ent�o, influenciadores tem relev�ncia.. o problema � que o pessoal do BIP-110 n�o est� influenciando quase ningu�m.

Se voc� est� falando sobre a sinaliza��o dos mineradores.. a galera do BIP-110 vai empurrar isso de qualquer jeito, com ou sem apoio, como voc� pode ver abaixo:

Quote from: https://x.com/LukeDashjr/status/2074281153553371560

Muito provavelmente, o BIP110 ser� ativado sem problemas e n�o haver� divis�o da cadeia. Eles sequer propuseram um fork de contraposi��o at� agora. [...] Os mineradores n�o decidem o protocolo. Em agosto, a sinaliza��o se tornar� obrigat�ria; caso contr�rio, eles perder�o todas as recompensas por bloco. J� vimos isso ser comprovado com o BIP148. E, ao contr�rio daquela ocasi�o, desta vez os mineradores n�o t�m motivos para tentar atacar a rede.

Os caras est�o bem doidos com esse BIP ai Shocked

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 09:18:21 PM

Maybe you need to use more AI. It really helps in everything.

Basically all software and websites are written with AI help (or entirely written by AI).
Scientists are using it in their researches.
Every job in offices now can increase their productivity with AI.

Helps translating, create videos, write articles, create images, works in excel sheets, etc.. the list is endless of things AI is already doing.

AI is very useful nowadays. Look at those who advertise on YouTube and Facebook; most of them are AI-generated. They are no longer hiring an artist or popular vlogger to promote their product; instead, they hire someone who can do AI-generated videos because it is way cheaper than hiring an artist or a vlogger, and the good thing is they can finish the service almost immediately and be ready to start a campaign ad.

This AI honestly already existed before the hype. I am using a few of them to auto-generate some feeds to my social media accounts with a little change to the content before they post it to all of my social media accounts. It's for SEO and learning purposes before promoting my own site without spending.
We are in the AI era, and we see almost every month there is a new project related to AI. Even Google nowadays is slowly accepting AI-generated content on blogs, even though they were against it before.

Quote from: sabotag3x on Today at 07:18:06 PM

Agora as pessoas n�o precisam comprar mais memecoins.. podem se expor a algo mais interessante Tongue

Esse � um bom ponto.

Talvez o que aprenderam com essas negocia��es sem sentido em memecoins, permitiu agora estarem a expor-se a algo mais interessante e realista.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:36:16 PM

Acho que o dinheiro de risco e especula��o esta todo em AI e tecnologia agora. E tiraram do btc.

O ponto � perceber se o Bitcoin vai voltar ser o ponto de risco, quando essa onda do IA abrandar.

Quote from: PrivacyG on Today at 09:09:44 PM

'AI is necessary!' So it does not matter if the world burns now because it is some thing we definitely can not live with out!

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:51:16 PM

I love bitcoin. I think it is more than a decentralized currency, it is a public good.

But AI can be a lot more than that. AI can change the world. It is worth investing all possible energy at it, everyone is using it everywhere.

Bitcoin is a much older technology and AI is much more used

AI has changed even Bitcoin Talk, now that we have so many shit posters using it to write their B S!

What has AI done so particularly incredible? AI drink flavors? Deep fakes? Not being able to tell reality from fiction? Using Chat GPT for legal advice? The amazing WhatsApp feature where your conversations are beautifully summarized by AI?

I admit there are interesting things AI can do but everyone is using it everywhere because you have no choice considering EVEN OVENS ARE NOW 'POWERED BY AI'!

Your expression is quite the hard truth and what got me here is the last phrase.' even ovens are now powered by AI'. I would certainly love to use an oven, but you hit the point square on.

The growth of AI is more like an arms race to me because of its many uses and integration that bides time, enhances productivity and efficiency. It's in every sector and a country that owns control over AI ultimately rules the world, not Bitcoin that is decentralized, belongs to everyone, threatens the traditional monetary system and is hardly controlled nor truly makes one country more powerful than the other.

AI definitely uses more energy than Bitcoin systems ever could but the government is willing to turn a blind eye to this seeing the above reasons I spoke on, but let's see how long it would take for energy crisis to start and how AI gets to summount some of the hurdles that may arise in a foreseeable future where the effects starts to mount.

'AI is necessary!' So it does not matter if the world burns now because it is some thing we definitely can not live with out!

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:51:16 PM

Bitz.io - Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casino to Play [Bitz.io] [ANN thread] [Telegram] [X (Twitter)]

Quote

🎰 Bitz.io is a crypto-first online casino and sportsbook that launched in 2023 with a bold, player-focused approach. Bitz, known for its sleek interface and lightning-fast payouts, offers over 4,000 games, including slots, live tables, and sports betting options. Bitz.io is presenting a free raffle for the community.

Prize
1st: $30
2nd: $20
3rd: $15

╔══════

✦ Rules:

   ⚡ You must be a Member to participate.
   ⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 40.
   ⚡ Three winners will share $65 in Bitcoin* The prize has 2x wagering requirement. 1x wagering requirement if you use the tracking link from this thread to sign up..
   ⚡ Reward will be credited to your Bitz.io account.
   ⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
   ⚡ I and Bitz.io reserves the right to change the rules and disqualify participants.

══════╝

✦ Application format:

Code:

Bitz.io Username:
Slot number:

✦ List of participants:

Professionally managed by;

Quote

Quote from: WillyAp on July 13, 2026, 10:32:47 PM

I don't agree.
There are ways to escape inflation, even if you make your money with a bread and butter job you can escape it.
Only if you don't become active you are victim to outer circunstancies..

How exactly do you mean with this? Inflation per definition is not that can be escaped, so even if you went into something like Bitcoin fully you are still affected by inflation because the prices of everything that you need are rising all the time. If you mean something else like earning more than inflation, then that is possible but any kind of passive income story has its own risk. It is not like for example now you rent out a house or apartment and there are no issues are you are earning enough forever. This is the case when you have high inflation even in the best countries which is the case these days, it is an endless fight for making enough money for the future.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:37:29 AM

Quote from: WillyAp on July 13, 2026, 10:32:47 PM

I don't agree.
There are ways to escape inflation, even if you make your money with a bread and butter job you can escape it.
Only if you don't become active you are victim to outer circunstancies..

Inflation destroys everything. Living 3-5% anual inflation is easy, and that is not the problem. The problem are higher inflation rates over decades.

I grew up in country with 80-100% inflation per month. That is crazy, and economy is destroyed. Nobody knows how much anything costs, sometimes a person gets a good job and it becomes bad quite quickly and might become good again.

While I emphasize with your situation and understand the extremity of your example, I would not say that living with 5% annual inflation is easy. Easy relative to your case? Yeah that is for sure, but it is not that easy overall. I remember a long time ago you could feed a whole family for a month with $200 in the developed world, and in those years in the less developed one it must have been even less. In 2 decades or so the cost has increased 5 times or more, there are differences depending on where people are. Even in the last few years the cost has easily increased by 50%, it does not matter what official inflation data lies are given. If you track your grocery spending historically and there are no big changes in where you live or what you buy, you can get better data yourself that will be more accurate. Inflation is a huge problem, and is a source of many issues that we have these days.

24Casino | Best Online Casino & Live Casino [24Casino.com] [ANN thread] [Telegram]

Quote

24Casino is an online gaming platform offering a wide range of casino entertainment, including slots, table games, live casino experiences, jackpots, and sports betting. It highlights fast payments, 24/7 support, frequent bonuses, and games from certified, reputable providers. The site operates under an international e‑gaming license and emphasizes responsible gambling, reminding players to play safely and within their limits.

Prize
1st: $100
2nd: $65
3rd: $35

╔══════

✦ Rules:

   ⚡ You must be a Member to participate.
   ⚡ Pick a slot from 01 to 100.
   ⚡ Three winners will share $200 in Bitcoin* The prize has 1x wagering requirement. Max win is 5x..
   ⚡ Reward will be credited to your 24Casino.com account.
   ⚡ We will pick a block to find the winners. We will use bitmover's Bitcointalk Giveaway Manager to find the winners.
   ⚡ I and 24Casino.com reserves the right to change the rules, terminate the contest, and disqualify participants.

══════╝

✦ Application format:

Code:

24Casino UID:
Slot number:

✦ List of participants:

Professionally managed by;

Quote

24Casino | Best Online Casino & Live Casino [24Casino.com] [ANN thread] [Telegram]

Quote

Prize
1st: $100
2nd: $65
3rd: $35

╔══════

══════╝

✦ Application format:

Code:

24Casino UID:
Slot number:

✦ List of participants:

Professionally managed by;

Quote

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:37:29 AM

Inflation destroys everything. Living 3-5% anual inflation is easy, and that is not the problem. The problem are higher inflation rates over decades.

Increasingly high inflation rate over decade is the big Elephant in the building, and the reason is that, when inflation surge high and recession hit the economy, where there are no proactive sustainable measures to deal with the root cause of it, the percentage of inflation keep rising and the reflection is on the price of basic commodities will keep escalating.

Quote

I grew up in country with 80-100% inflation per month. That is crazy, and economy is destroyed. Nobody knows how much anything costs, sometimes a person gets a good job and it becomes bad quite quickly and might become good again.

When a country lack the most important factors that drive the economy like, good governance, low corruption tendency, high productivity and low unemployment, then security, it will be difficult for such a country without the above quality to over inflation over time.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:56:04 PM

Spcx closed almost at IPO price, $139 now.

It may be an opportunity to buy, but i still think it is highly overpriced

Not if they lay the 1st stone on the moon.
The moon is a no-brainer as you can lift off from the moon with a fraction of the monstrous amount of power needed now.

https://www.spacex.com/humanspaceflight/moon

Quote from: FinneysTrueVision on June 18, 2026, 06:58:10 AM

xStocks and Ondo Finance are the biggest tokenized stock providers right now, but I think Binance and Coinbase also have their own version. There�s also several futures and perpetual markets where you can speculate on the price of SPCX.

Buying with Bitcoin can probably only be done via centralized exchanges. You should first check what is being offered on whichever exchange you are registered on and research if those SPCX-backed tokens are reputable enough.

I wonder how safe these things are in the long term? For me it seems that a lot of platform managed to get tokenized stocks very quickly in recent time, but I am quite skeptical about this for now much more than with stablecoins. Can you somehow redeem them and get an equivalent share on some traditional platform with the traditional form? If you can't, how can we be sure that they represent real stock and are just not price tracking it with fake units? I wonder also who needs this because if someone is comfortable doing KYC on an exchange, what would be the problem to register with Fidelity or Vanguard? Maybe they are available in less places than Binance, so it is a question of availability?

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:56:04 PM

Spcx closed almost at IPO price, $139 now.

It may be an opportunity to buy, but i still think it is highly overpriced

The market cap is huge, many things are overpriced compared to revenue and earnings. I think that we may see a repeat of the 1920s in this same decade, but it is possible to avoid it if they manipulate fiat heavily and do a major intervention.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:22:25 PM

Spcx closed almost in IPO price.
$ 139

Any buyers now?
There will be a big dump in about 5 months when most lock ups end.

i got 4 shares today.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 08:22:25 PM

Spcx closed almost in IPO price.
$ 139

Any buyers now?
There will be a big dump in about 5 months when most lock ups end.

I would be a buyer from $120 (if it ever gets there)...loved the "Star Trek" and "Star Trek NG".
That said, I will add slowly.

Quote from: TokenTikas on Today at 09:34:56 AM

Over the past one week of using Dex.Fo, I tried to present some of the points that I think should be brought to attention.

Point 01:
Complete tutorial should be created showing the entire swap process using the exchange, so that any new user can easily understand it just by watching it and be able to perform swaps using the exchange.

A fair point, but I believe the UI is simple and easy for everyone to use. To me a video tutorial is not necessary. This is not like a DEX where people will sign contracts to execute transaction.

Quote from: TokenTikas on Today at 09:34:56 AM

Point 02:
It's necessary to inform everyone about using the refund address when swapping. If there are any cases where users faced problems during a swap and the exchange could not be completed, but the funds were returned to the refund address, those stories should be shared.

Bitmover raised this concern and the team promised to implement it in their next update.

Quote from: TokenTikas on Today at 09:34:56 AM

Point 03:
If someone accidentally sends funds through the wrong blockchain while making a swap, is there any possibility of getting those funds back? Or does Dex.Fo have any record of such cases? Providing complete information on this topic would be very helpful for users. Although many exchanges handle this issue carefully and return users' funds whenever possible, I could not find any information about how this exchange deals with such situations. That's why i'm asking. I hope the Dex.Fo representative will definitely look into this matter.

If it is possible, I think DEX.fo could return such funds. But for many exchanges I have used, it is always stated that your funds could permanently get lost if you send to the wrong network. Dex might have no control over this.

Quote from: TokenTikas on Today at 09:34:56 AM

Point 04:
The minimum requirement of the exchange seems a bit high because many users may not be able to use the exchange with that amount. If the minimum requirement could be reduced to around ($15�$20), it would be much better. I would also like to know if there will be any update regarding lowering the minimum requirement.

Having seen the min deposits of DEX competitors, I can say that DEX min deposit is okay. I will only ask for $15 min deposit from newly non reputable exchanges with zero escrow

Quote from: TokenTikas on Today at 09:34:56 AM

Point 05:
I can see that the Escrow is being increased but the exchange token is not being increased. Will the exchange reserve be increased in the future, or will it remain the same? I would appreciate some clarification on this as well. Thank you.

The exchange reserve is okay for the current market they cover. I think the right question should be, how soon are we expecting DEX self reserve to enable the fast mode exchange?

Quote from: TokenTikas on Today at 09:34:56 AM

Final Thoughts:
Actually used this exchange and compared to the reviews from other users, I have received much better results. Dex.Fo is moving forward and the representative, @DEX.fo_off, is very active. He is resolving everyone's issues properly and providing updates regularly. Since the representative is user-friendly, people are gaining more confidence in the exchange. Good luck, Dex.Fo.

That's true, I give it to DEX rep here. He attends to every questions and complaints here and that boosts confidence in the service.

Meanwhile, congratulations TokenTikas and welcome to the DEX campaign.

Quote from: Biodom on Today at 03:56:19 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on Today at 02:42:58 AM

If you think hundreds of years of abandoned property laws are not going to be used against btc you are sooo fucking delu lu it is sad.
btc is being wrapped into real fi as we type and abandoned property laws are in effect world wide for centuries.

my idea is simple and easy and will be the most gentle way to get ahead of the attack that will certainly happen to btc when it comes to abandon propety.

^I think that this is not how you present it.
Knowing what everyone literally knows (the public key) does not entitle you to claim that it was abandoned.
I also gave an example of a telescope in someone's apartment.
Seeing a telescope in a window of a Central park apartment and then seeing it again 10 years later does not entitle you to ANYTHING.
To think otherwise is simply wrong, imho.

The only potential wrinkle in all this if it is a state or fed gov who is behind this lawsuit.
I give the lawsuit a 70-90% chance of being dismissed outright.

You are correct that when the state (any government) starts pushing confiscation laws for itself, then they make all kind of inconsistent (and even unjust) proclamations about property escheating to the state - even though with bitcoin they still would have to overcome the obstacle of their not having the private key, in the event that the bitcoin is not being held by a third party who would cooperate with the government to hand over the property.

If the keys are in the hands of a private party, then the keys cannot be handed over without the cooperation of the private party, even though the movement of the UTXOs could be monitored so that if they are moved to some place in which a private party would be/could be coerced, then we cannot put it past a government to NOT intervene and/or proclaim a right to intervene... and/or to just engage in bullying and/or theft.

In many places, there do exist due process laws that involve confiscation, yet frequently governments run rough shod over those kinds of laws, and there are many ongoing injustices in the property laws around governmental confiscation/seizure (which injustices likely could also be stretched to be applied to claims of abandonment).

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on Today at 05:10:16 AM

Yes, we are all retarded here, but not that retarded!

Mindblow.

There are levels of retardedness?

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 01:36:15 PM

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on Today at 05:10:16 AM

If Phil's delusional idea (of declaring unmoved coins abandoned) ever goes into effect, and coins are ever forcibly confiscated by a s/w change, that will be the beginning of the end of Bitcoin. And Craig Wright will have a hard-on until the day he dies.

Most of my coins have not been moved for many years. Should I be worried?
Yes, we are all retarded here, but not that retarded!

This is against everything bitcoin stands for. Basic property rights.
Just like some people hold stocks or ETF funds for decades , without selling them. Nobody can just confiscate them because you don't sell them in a long time.

Of course, the situation is different if the keys are not actually held by the individual. State by state there are laws about abandoned property, so if a guy held an account and did not log in for 10 years, the state likely has laws about escheating those funds to the state.

I had that happen to me regarding one of my accounts in 2021-ish, and there was like 0.13 BTC in the account. I had not realized that i had not logged into the account for a while and they even had some other things going on regarding that particular "exchange." I started to get notifications in the mail about $6k-ish of property that I had and to get help to get the property returned to me. I had no idea what those pieces of mail was talking about, and I thought that it was junk mail, but then after a while with similar mail, I made the connection. When I looked at the mail, they claimed to help me to get my property back and they would get 10% of the amount. I looked into the matter and how to claim directly, and I was able to apply and get the whole amount back (without any fees). The state had sold the bitcoin at around $44k-ish as soon as it "escheated" to the state, and so I ended up receiving the dollar value which was somewhere in the lower $6k-ish territories.

In the context of an active account or a relationship with some broker, then there would be difficulties with claims of abandonment, yet surely guys can die or they might lose contact with their broker or not log into their account, yet in those cases, the individual do not have the private keys and the property would most likely escheat over to the state, as compared to situations in which the private keys are held by the individual who might have had died or otherwise disappeared (or lost access to his coins by death, disability or even forgetting his keys). In those cases, no one has the keys, not even the core developers (absent a change to the bitcoin software).

Quote from: God Of Thunder on July 10, 2026, 03:16:26 PM

Winners

Winner:
05 - rbynxx

Winner 2:
29 - m2017

Winner 3:
01 - ibuddy122505

Veify here

Please DM me your Bitz.io Bitcoin deposit address.

Paid. Please check your bitz account.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:28:29 AM

Added the terms of service (ToS), a requirement to list the website in kycnotme and other services.
Important thing that I never created, now fixed.

https://bitcoindata.science/terms-of-service

If you are already at it, then I will suggest that you create a complete legal center that will cover all legal matters. Privacy policy, cookie policy, disclaimer...
Although you are not from the EU, the site has global visitors, so I would think about adding a consent banner.
IA can help Cheesy

Quote from: bitmover on June 14, 2026, 03:53:50 PM

A populacao ta pedindo socorro ja.

Galera e presa 30x roubando celular e a justica solta no mesmo dia. e os "nossos criminosos " est�o botando barricada e aterrorizando a popula��o

A justi�a ou determinado juiz ? Tem que ver. Generalizar n�o � o caminho. Fora que tem milhares de presos sem condena��o definitiva e continuam presos provis�rios por anos.

Fora, como disse o ex-ministro Lewandowski, a policia prende muito mal. Deixa muitas falhas para depois os advogados dos bandidos agirem para solta-los.

Se prender direito, garanto que ficam presos por um bom tempo.

Nice. Good tutorial at translation. Mukhang pinag-gugulan mo talaga ng ilang oras ang pag-translate dito. Wink

Anyways..

Quote from: Peanutswar on June 12, 2026, 01:59:48 PM

May ilang paraan para malaman ang kasalukuyang halaga ng transaction fee ang kailangan.
Ang isa sa mga paraan para tingnan ito ay sa Mempool Observer Topic at tingnan ang maaaring maging fee gamit ang FeeBuddy bot.

Aside sa dalawang nabanggit, may iba pa ba kayong alam na site or (Telegram bot, since mas madalas tayo sa TG) na may simple data ng current BTC transaction fees?
Ang alam ko 'lang ay itong site na to: https://bitref.com/fees/
Not sure if it's accurate, though, pero I've been using this site as a reference for the current BTC network conditions and fees. Ok naman, so far. Cool

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:18:55 AM

@bitmover A few days ago, on another forum, we discussed gold as an investment. Without going into details or conclusions, one user proposed a very similar strategy in gold investment, to the one you and JayJuanGee did.
What do you think about the proposal to do a similar tool for gold, and the possibility of comparing this type of investment in two very "similar" assets, Bitcoin and gold?

I doubt that it works with gold, yet surely someone who might be an "expert" in gold might strive to make some kind of a similar comparison, yet my own attempt to apply the 200-WMA to bitcoin and to tailorize tools around such 200-WMA (bottom as a proximation) seems to have a wee bit of unique application to bitcoin's so far existence... and yeah, who knows for sure my ways of framing are going to continue to work, including that currently there are some folks who challenge the applicability of my ways to strive to frame (or emphasize) the bitcoin price to the 200-WMA.

Even when bitmover and I were discussing the projection tool that is at the bottom of the tool, I recall that I was arguing a bit against such an additional tool and considering that it was not really going to add much or anything, yet that portion of the tool frequently helps in back tracing how past projections (and even the application of sustainable withdrawal frameworks) would have had ended up playing out.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:56:47 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:18:55 AM

I never thought about adding the same technical analysis to gold.
I just applied the 200 WMA to gold chart, since 1996 (30years)

Gold cycles are much longer (~10y bear markets)... And they do have a strong indicatior when the 200WMA crosses the price.
I just became a bit worried about my position. I wouldn't want to hold this bag for 10 years Cheesy

But I still think it can go a bit further.

According to JJG strategy, it is time to make a more aggressive sell with some advanced months.

Of course in the 2.5-ish years since you (bitmover) and I had been working on the tool and brain storming how to attempt to tweak withdrawal amounts based on BTC price, there have been ongoing questions regarding the extent to which we might be able to extrapolate past cycles into future guidance in regards to how aggressive to authorize withdrawal levels at various points when the BTC price exceeds the 200-WMA as compared with various points to lessen the withdrawal authorization amounts based on the BTC price being less than 25% above the 200-WMA or even currently when the BTC price is barely above the 200-WMA (and the various staggering of the lessening of the withdrawal authorizations if the BTC price were to continue to reach even lower levels below the 200-WMA).

Of course, on the opposite of the spectrum, to the extent that BTC prices might get back to 25% above the 200-WMA and at various higher price points, then the higher withdrawal authorizations would end up falling within the tools guidances.

In some sense, I am not exactly sure what you mean when you say "it is time" for "more aggression," since right now, in accordance with the tool guidances, these are currently times to be more whimpy in withdrawals and to tone down withdrawal levels to the extent that any guys may well be trying to stay in line with the guidances of the parameters (and thinking) within the tool (which of course relate to my ongoing attempts to frame the withdrawal authorization levels matters) rather than coming up with their own withdrawal parameters that surely may well end up deviating quite a bit from my own suggestions even though the tool does not stop guys from coming up with their own guidances and guidelines regarding what they might consider to be their version of time-based sustained withdrawal levels.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:56:47 AM

Maybe even some other assets could be added to the tool. Gold, Sp500?

Sure, some of the ideas of the tool could still be applied to other assets, such as Gold, Sp500 or even other assets, yet there is a bit of specialization of the ideas of this particular tool being framed specifically around bitcoin, so surely other presumptions would have to apply to any other assets in which such a tool might be designed around them, and personally, I hardly have any interest in getting distracted into shitcoins, inferior assets (or other non-bticoin assets) even though some of the underlying ideas of the tool (of relying valuations upon moving averages rather than spot prices) still could be applied to show how those other assets suck as compared with bitcoin.. but didn't we already know that?

Sure, some folks still have not figured out the greatness of bitcoin as compared with other assets, which might be part of the motivation to spend time, energy and value focusing on other assets.... hahahahahaha and part of the reason that higher sustainable withdrawal rates work for bitcoin and don't seem too likely to work so well (sustainably) with various other non-bitcoin assets, which is why the traditional 4% sustainable withdrawal rules (guidelines) tend to apply to other assets (and traditional asset evaluation circles), and bitcoin likely can (arguably?) sustain something like a 10% withdrawal rate when bitcoin's valuations are guided by the 200-WMA rather than by BTC spot prices... which surely is part of the angle that I tend to be ongoingly arguing in terms of trying to get guys to not get so distracted by spot prices and to try to stay focused on valuations around the 200-WMA (which is ongoingly easier said than done.. and I have been ongoingly trying to practice these principles myself.. which sometimes I am having to shake myself into such framework and reframing of the bitcoin valuation matter).

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:06:09 PM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:56:47 AM

I just became a bit worried about my position. I wouldn't want to hold this bag for 10 years Cheesy

But I still think it can go a bit further.
According to JJG strategy, it is time to make a more aggressive sell with some advanced months.

Maybe even some other assets could be added to the tool. Gold, Sp500?

I often saw doubts and discussions about which instrument is better for investment, Bitcoin or Gold. Maybe this kind of comparison tool could help in this dilemma.
For example, I still have doubts whether long-term holding of these two assets can be considered as passive income. This JJG strategy is perhaps the closest to that.

I have been largely stealing from traditional sustainable withdrawal guidelines, so in some sense, whatever I have been adding has not really been anything new, and likely even bitmover could attest that in the beginning of our attempting to figure out some of the defaults on the tool, I was gravitating towards having a starting point of 6%, even though we both acknowledged that traditional sustainable withdrawal theories tended to gravitate towards 4% annual withdrawal rates, yet especially when bitmover designed the backtesting portion of the tool at the bottom, we had a bit of argumentation and even amazement (or maybe it was disbelief) that even if we maximize the tool at at 30%, there were so many times that the withdrawal rate still had a decent amount of sustainability within it).

Sometimes many of us might not even completely know what passive income is, except maybe if we have some agent who takes care of some of the finances (and accounting) and we just sit back and receive our money each quarter (or month - or whatever might be are payment time period), yet surely it seems quite likely to me that if guys have enough bitcoin, and they are withdrawing at a rate that is relatively low (including lower than my own advised 10% based on the 200-WMA), there could surely be quite a bit of set it and forget it within bitcoin and within making sure that the cushion is retained and not dwindling with the passage of time, yet ongoingly there are likely questions about how much bitcoin is enough and then wanting to make sure that the bitcoin is ongoingly growing faster than the rate in which it is being withdrawn, and surely it seems to me that the 200-WMA gives way more guidance about the setting of a sustainable withdrawal rate rather than bouncing all over the place trying to figure out how to guess about withdrawal rate when BTC spot prices have been and likely to continue to move around so much.. and surely, so far in bitcoin's history, the 200-WMA has not failed to continue to ongoingly and persistently go up, even in periods that the BTC price has languished at or even below the 200-WMA for fairly extended periods of time (like for the 16-ish months that we saw between June 2022 and October 2023).

Quote from: bitmover on July 08, 2026, 10:12:35 AM

L� impera a lei. A regula��o vai ser aplicada igual para todas. E elas podem recorrer na justi�a se sentirem injustic�adas. L� n�o � brasil que s� os amigos do rei se d�o bem (tipo odebretch, banco master Cheesy

)

Ia comentar exatamente isso, l� eles possuem seguran�a jur�dica bem mais estruturada se comparado ao terceiro-mundismo, n�o tem um SFT que manda bloquear o X s� porque n�o gostaria que 1 post ou conta continuasse na plataforma. Apesar de eu n�o ver isso com bons olhos, empresas fazendo acordos com o governo, tipo um lobby (mas l� isso � permitido tamb�m).

Quote from: joker_josue on July 07, 2026, 06:59:06 AM

Faz sentido, na logica de que o OpenIA esta a obter ganhos fruto do conhecimento geral da popula��o.

Por outro lado, al�m de limitar esses "ganhos" a popula��o dos EUA, acaba por estar a permitir que uma empresa privada seja influenciada pelo governo.

Isso � o que eu gostaria de ver na pr�tica, lembrando que o EUA ainda � um governo rs, mas � o governo em que as pessoas mais confiam pra fazer esses neg�cios (at� eu confiaria, pelo menos bem mais que em rela��o ao vuvuzuelazil).

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:03:06 AM

I miss a QR Code for you bitcoin address. Maybe it could make donations easier?

I never thought about that.

The QR code is only useful for those who are viewing the website on a screen and then search for the code with their smartphone.
Now, my question is: will someone on a PC actually use their smartphone to send BTC?
Because for those using the website on their smartphone, the QR code is useless.

What do you think?

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 04:12:43 PM

That's normal, it's the average Bitcoin rabbit hole experience. Most of us started with zero tech background and had to google every second word at the beginning.

Don't stress about it, the answers are coming. If you're already DCAing and self-custodying in a cold wallet, you're ahead of 90% of people in this space. Keep stacking and learning, this forum will help you with any Bitcoin question.

Newbies can start their learning in an easy way, they don't have to force themselves and feel stressed with learning. Do it in comfortable ways is better and as a matter of fact, time flies fast so their learning will be improved and accumulated fast too.

DCA for investment is very good strategy.
DCA for entries
Dollar Cost Averaging with costavg.com include exchange fee

DCA for withdrawals
JJG Sustainable Bitcoin Withdrawal Strategy
https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 11:56:47 AM

I just became a bit worried about my position. I wouldn't want to hold this bag for 10 years Cheesy

But I still think it can go a bit further.

According to JJG strategy, it is time to make a more aggressive sell with some advanced months.

Maybe even some other assets could be added to the tool. Gold, Sp500?

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (61) 14637 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 9958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4699 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2871 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3592 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2084 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6252 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2161 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (13) 6622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1916 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2368 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6264 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (34) 10138 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 744 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3923 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (67) 21185 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3107 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10109 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1959 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3555 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 12876 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1460 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2332 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2088 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9896 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2624 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7612 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4207 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3436 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 20945 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2920 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2564 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5742 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1603 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +49 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1510 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5642 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9833 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5343 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1279 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3546 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1005 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8773 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)