bitmover's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned bitmover in the past 7 days

Quote from: bitmover on December 29, 2025, 02:19:16 PM

...
Acho que ele faz uma contribuição interessante para o bitcoin no brasil, estimulando auto custódia e a compra do bitcoin.

Sim, ele faz uma grande contribuiçao ao BTC,
com cursos gartis pra quem nao sabe nada e etc,
mas depois que ele começou a parfticipar de podcasts,
ele esta conseguindo alcançar um publico mais seletivo,
claro, alem de ter aumentado o alcance em geral,
surgiu varios golpistas usando o nome dele... hahaha...

Quote from: sabotag3x on December 29, 2025, 06:56:59 PM

Quote from: ESG on December 16, 2025, 03:48:57 AM

(nao sei como funciona aqui,... )

Aqui pode-se falar sobre tudo, ainda mais que é algo ligado ao Bitcoin.

Obrigado.

...o problema de falar de tudo, que eu ja falo demais, rsss....
entao tenho tentado evitar de falar ..hehehe...

mas , eu nao sou muito fan de Marçal nao viu, tipo do cara ser superior... mas nesse video ae, é beminteressante, porque os dois sao inteligentes... e no final ele convence o marçal a comprar btc hahaha...
..entao to mudando o nome do topico, e tirando o nome do marçal, e vou adicionar mais uns dois ou tres videos ineteressante dele...38tao, ...
...
.. Sim ele super semelhante ao Daniel, mas a diferença,
que Daniel sumiu sem responder todos processos,
e ele esta repondendo...hehhee e nao é pouco.

no caso, esse video dele que estou deixando aqui ,
eu acho bem interessante tambem, pois estao tres figuras importaissimas,
sendo duas, que ajudaram o btc a crescer aqui,
mas o video apesar de falarem bem sobre BTC,
assunto é sobre o sistema de trade emA I Saturno V, do Hildenburg Melão, o Q I mais alto do Brasil.

> Análise Fundamental, Técnica e Conceitual | Hindemburg Melão, Renato Amoedo e Fausto Botelho

e mais esse do Renato e o Hildenburg, no RedCast.

esses videos tem muita informaçao e conhecimento.

com o tempo vou adicionando mais,
para informaçao e conhecimento somente,

se quiser adicionar mais videos dele, à vontade.
... de acordo com que ele vem dizendo, ele vai sair fora,
mais pretende voltar hehehe locomemo..

Obrigado pela recomendação, Bitmover.

Já conhecia o Antonopoulos de nome, mas ainda não tinha parado para estudar com mais atenção.
Vou começar pelos vídeos e depois ler o Mastering Bitcoin.

Agradeço por compartilhar o material.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 05:30:02 PM

Certainly a hacker who can hack computer in public wi-fi wont be targeting poor cryptocurrency gamblers here Cheesy

That’s in the event they know that you are poor or broke but, hackers can be weird at times, they would just want to get along with it just to prove that they can, test themselves maybe and have an orgasm doing it.

Quote

A good hacker that is able to hack public wi-fi will certainly be looking for much bigger fish... People with much more money, not just a few bucks or at most a few hundreds dollars in a casino

That’s in the case of hackers only having to hack for monetary purposes. Some of them are out there for what credentials they could get from a KYC activated account, documents they can sell and use in other illicit purposes.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:08:50 PM

hacks usually happen when the password is compromised in some way. A large number of users set passwords with their birthday, children's names or similar, which is quite easy to "hack". Even the most famous hacks happened because the developer leaked the password.
Very far from what we see in the Hollywood movies

Yeah, there is always a weak link that would be attacked and it always comes from compromise.

Quote from: bitmover on December 28, 2025, 11:33:00 PM

You guys are being too paranoid. There isn't much problem to use public wifi when gambling, using cryptoexchanges or whatever (as long as your device isn't infected with malware).

Not really sure about this as it depends on the public network you are connected to and how that network is configured.
But, as you said, if you are certain that you didn’t do anything wrong and didn’t intentionally breach the service/casino’s terms, then there is nothing to be afraid of.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 05:30:02 PM

Yeah, certainly hack is not a risk

Certainly a hacker who can hack computer in public wi-fi wont be targeting poor cryptocurrency gamblers here Cheesy

A good hacker that is able to hack public wi-fi will certainly be looking for much bigger fish... People with much more money, not just a few bucks or at most a few hundreds dollars in a casino

hacks usually happen when the password is compromised in some way. A large number of users set passwords with their birthday, children's names or similar, which is quite easy to "hack". Even the most famous hacks happened because the developer leaked the password.
Very far from what we see in the Hollywood movies

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 05:30:02 PM

Quote from: PX-Z on Today at 05:09:27 PM

Quote from: Ultegra134 on Today at 04:56:10 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 28, 2025, 11:33:00 PM

You guys are being too paranoid. There isn't much problem to use public wifi when gambling, using cryptoexchanges or whatever (as long as your device isn't infected with malware).

The casino will identify that the user is using a public network, it can be determined (with high probability) using the IP. Public networks such as airports have a different IP than a private network.

Yeah, you're right; I don't understand why some people become overly paranoid as well. The casino can spot which IPs are your most frequent ones, if you're logging in 100 times from your hometown in Germany for instance, and you login once from Poland, the casino won't suddenly flag you for one IP that may be public or a VPN. It requires much more incidents than this to cause issues with your account. Even in the unlikely event of it happening, they'll first ask for KYC, if you have no issues complying, you'll be okay.

Can understand where those peeps coming from there are lots of ways how to hack public wifi but of course only hand full dudes can do that. While changing wifi, device are normal to people, casinos won't just flag someone just because of the ip address changes, especially for a casino that accepts VPN use. As long you're not coming from a restricted country changing VPN server from country to another is just okay.

Yeah, certainly hack is not a risk

Certainly a hacker who can hack computer in public wi-fi wont be targeting poor cryptocurrency gamblers here Cheesy

A good hacker that is able to hack public wi-fi will certainly be looking for much bigger fish... People with much more money, not just a few bucks or at most a few hundreds dollars in a casino

Meaning, through public Wi-Fi, hackers can see potential prospects who would be most profitable for them, and they might ignore those who only offer small, insignificant gains?

Also, in my knowledge, public Wi-Fi is really prone to hacking, and this is something the majority of people don't actually know. Some even really wish for public Wi-Fi access, especially in low-income communities or compounds. It’s no wonder so many people get hacked, because some hackers might see 'small change' as worth it if they can gather enough of it from many people to make a large sum.

Quote from: ESG on December 16, 2025, 03:48:57 AM

(nao sei como funciona aqui, e acredito ser offtopic, mas só encontrei essa opção, pode remover sem problema. )

Aqui pode-se falar sobre tudo, ainda mais que é algo ligado ao Bitcoin.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:19:16 PM

Eu acho o Renato 38tao uma figura interessante, apesar de polêmica, e das bobagens que ele fala sobre mulheres e religião. Tem que relevar muito do que ele fala, mas dá pra extrair coisas boas.

Acho que ele faz uma contribuição interessante para o bitcoin no brasil, estimulando auto custódia e a compra do bitcoin.

Tenho a mesma opinião, também não concordo muito com a parte de religião/mulheres.. mas ele se tornou o "Daniel Fraga" dessa geração em relação ao Bitcoin.. é um dos únicos que furou a bolha e é conhecido fora desse meio.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:14:24 PM

Interessante esse SP500, nunca vi negociando em lugar nenhum esse ticker. Até procurei no coinmarketcap , mas não está lá.

Me parece que o token tem um risco alto da parte do emissor...

É futuros.. você não possui o token, não tem como depositar/sacar/etc.. só possui uma posição (long/short)..

Vamos ver como será o mercado spot, tem muitas exchanges que já começaram a listar ações tokenizadas, mas nenhuma contra BTC.

Quote from: Ultegra134 on Today at 04:56:10 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 28, 2025, 11:33:00 PM

You guys are being too paranoid. There isn't much problem to use public wifi when gambling, using cryptoexchanges or whatever (as long as your device isn't infected with malware).

The casino will identify that the user is using a public network, it can be determined (with high probability) using the IP. Public networks such as airports have a different IP than a private network.

Yeah, you're right; I don't understand why some people become overly paranoid as well. The casino can spot which IPs are your most frequent ones, if you're logging in 100 times from your hometown in Germany for instance, and you login once from Poland, the casino won't suddenly flag you for one IP that may be public or a VPN. It requires much more incidents than this to cause issues with your account. Even in the unlikely event of it happening, they'll first ask for KYC, if you have no issues complying, you'll be okay.

Can understand where those peeps coming from there are lots of ways how to hack public wifi but of course only hand full dudes can do that. While changing wifi, device are normal to people casinos won't just flag someone just because of the ip address changes, especially for a casino that accepts VPN use. As long you're not coming from a restricted country changing VPN server from country to another is just okay.

Quote from: bitmover on December 28, 2025, 11:33:00 PM

You guys are being too paranoid. There isn't much problem to use public wifi when gambling, using cryptoexchanges or whatever (as long as your device isn't infected with malware).

The casino will identify that the user is using a public network, it can be determined (with high probability) using the IP. Public networks such as airports have a different IP than a private network.

Yeah, you're right; I don't understand why some people become overly paranoid as well. The casino can spot which IPs are your most frequent ones, if you're logging in 100 times from your hometown in Germany for instance, and you login once from Poland, the casino won't suddenly flag you for one IP that may be public or a VPN.

scam top, scam bear done?
gyna pumps precious metals
demoralize all

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 28, 2025, 07:37:19 PM

Even though I frequently proclaim that I don't know where we are going, the 200-WMA can tell us where we are at.. and so we can see how far the BTC price is relative to the 200-WMA, which currently with the BTC price at $87,6000 and the 200-WMA at $56,700, we are about 55% above the 200-WMA.
Why use any other indicator, except maybe because other folks are using other indicators?

The 100-WMA can be helpful to see when the BTC price might get stuck between the 100-WMA and the 200-WMA.. then maybe that could be a sign that we are in a bear market or to confirm that we had entered a bear market. The 100-WMA is right around $83,600. By the way the 100-WMA can also be referred to as the 2 year moving average.

A problem with these indicators is that they can be gamed.. so then maybe if we stay below a price (such as the 100-WMA) for long enough, then maybe we will start to conclude that we have transitioned into a bear market.

I suppose that ultimately I like the 200-WMA since so far it is always moving up and it tends to take out a lo tof the shorter-term noise.. so it tells us where we are at, but not necessarily where we are going.. ..same with any of the indicators, even though surely we might try to extract some data from the various indicators to throw in a predictive element into the mix.

Of course, if you translate the 200 DMA into the weekly moving average then that is merely the 7 week moving average, which seems a bit short, which I suppose is the point, since we can compare the shorter with the longer and come up with some ideas about whetehr the trend has changed or if the trend is moving in a certain direction.

The 200 day is a decent short term goal post- but it's acted like a long term trend indicator with the volatility and limited history in this market, hence folks like Trace Mayer incorporating it so heavily. 4- and 2- year averages woulda been glacially long-term for coin in say, 2020 or earlier.

Spot bouncing ~5-10% above the 100 week provides essentially the same information: price is low, but not ugly by historical standards with recency bias removed- objectively not as bad as sentiment might indicate, and well above historical "bear markets". Equally as lukewarm as the lackluster October top.

If coin fails to retrace substantially from here and/or makes new ATHs next year, 4-year cycles may only be relevant insofar as the number of blocks between mining reward halvings.

Bitcoin is great at smashing price whisperer gurus' credibility- masterluc, planb, and now bob loukas.

Quote from: bitmover on December 28, 2025, 11:33:00 PM

You guys are being too paranoid. There isn't much problem to use public wifi when gambling...

There’s actually a basis for being paranoid here. Maybe you haven’t experienced issues using different Wi-Fi networks while gambling, but I’ve read reports about this before. It might not be standard across all casinos, maybe just random ones, but the risk is still there.

That’s why I’m just being cautious. If using the same Wi-Fi in one household can already be risky, then public Wi-Fi is obviously much worse. That’s the logic behind it.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 28, 2025, 07:37:19 PM

Quote from: asUHWEceyc on December 28, 2025, 04:49:15 PM

Quote from: Biodom on December 27, 2025, 06:40:09 PM

Found on reddit:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1pwi5pc/30_bitcoin_cycle_top_indicators_zero_triggered/
The thesis is that there are only two possibilities:
1. All previously designed top indicators (my comment-except the number of days passed post halving) are faulty.
2. This was not the top.

I think that the top was not in, but the day passed and a perfect fit with expected plus the diminishing return projected value might suggest otherwise.
Currently, I am 70:30 on this (70%-not yet, 30% -yes, we did hit the top in October).

Alternatively, we are switching to a more stock-market-like cycles with unpredictable ebbs and flows.

The 200dma was pierced on 11/04 for only the third time since mid-23: 1)for 8 days fully, but around two weeks back in 9/24 bottoming at 10% below; and 2)for a couple days in a less sustained manner circa Liberation Day `25. This has by far been the deepest, longest sustained correction since 2022.
But, we're still floating well above Jay's favorite 200wma metric (true bear indicator IMO) and a mere ~30% off the lackluster high, however it's approaching 2 months under the prior lowest level.

If 4year astrology proves to still be a thing, there's at least 9ish months of sideways-downity remaining: a dumbfoundingly difficult task with Trump Inc. pamping eet in an election year. $1776, 2026, etc

Quote from: asUHWEceyc on November 06, 2025, 01:51:36 PM

4-year Cycle Rules

~~Bear low does not violate prior ATH~~
~~Previous ATH is not exceeded until after halving~~
Q4 of year following halving yields parabolic* ATH
Subsequent 12-24 month bear market, 78+% drawdown

_{_{_{_*llamabolic}}}

Even though I frequently proclaim that I don't know where we are going, the 200-WMA can tell us where we are at.. and so we can see how far the BTC price is relative to the 200-WMA, which currently with the BTC price at $87,6000 and the 200-WMA at $56,700, we are about 55% above the 200-WMA.

Why use any other indicator, except maybe because other folks are using other indicators?

The 100-WMA can be helpful to see when the BTC price might get stuck between the 100-WMA and the 200-WMA.. then maybe that could be a sign that we are in a bear market or to confirm that we had entered a bear market. The 100-WMA is right around $83,600. By the way the 100-WMA can also be referred to as the 2 year moving average.

A problem with these indicators is that they can be gamed.. so then maybe if we stay below a price (such as the 100-WMA) for long enough, then maybe we will start to conclude that we have transitioned into a bear market.

I suppose that ultimately I like the 200-WMA since so far it is always moving up and it tends to take out a lo tof the shorter-term noise.. so it tells us where we are at, but not necessarily where we are going.. ..same with any of the indicators, even though surely we might try to extract some data from the various indicators to throw in a predictive element into the mix.

Of course, if you translate the 200 DMA into the weekly moving average then that is merely the 7 week moving average, which seems a bit short, which I suppose is the point, since we can compare the shorter with the longer and come up with some ideas about whetehr the trend has changed or if the trend is moving in a certain direction.

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 28, 2025, 04:56:18 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 27, 2025, 09:18:43 PM

I suppose the Doctors (et al) are working to figure out your diagnosis. Hopefully nothing too serious.

Quickly looking at some pulse oximeter information, I see that even below 92% could be worrisome if it is an accurate reading and not due to measuring device errors... so loss of consciousness and brain damage could start to kick in when in the lower 80%s... so it seems that 70% would have had put you into unconsciousness...and brain dead.. so hopefully that low measurement was due to measurement variability rather than reading an accurate blood/oxygen level.

It didn't take them long to figure out what was wrong... common pneumonia. You probably know that streptococcus pneumoniae normally exists in all our bodies and will develop into pneumonia when we are weakened by other diseases. I knew I'd picked up some kind of flu or other virus several weeks ago. I guess that triggered the pneumonia. Before I even called a cab I started myself on prednisone which my respirologist had given to me to use at my discretion in case of an emergency. At the hospital they quickly started me on amoxiclav and continued my prednisone.

My main reason to stay was oxygen. Because of the holiday short staffing, there was a bit of a mixup. The nurses monitoring my oxygen levels tried to keep my oximeter readings up in the high nineties. When an actual respirologist came in and saw what was happening she explained that after years of COPD my system had adapted and that my new normal was the 88-92 range and that the occasional dips into the high 70s was acceptable. By late yesterday we'd achieved these levels without extra oxygen so they discharged me.

They just make up shit as they go.. so that they can release you without feeling legally liable.

Cheesy

I am glad that things were pinpointed and the issue was not more serious - or at least if you have a path forward to potentially just to get back to what you had been in previously and assuming recovery after taking the antibiotics and the steroids. I heard that people can have issues with prednisone.. as with any systematic medications.

Do you smoke or vape?

Quote from: Greyhats on December 28, 2025, 05:05:29 PM

Popped in to say hi
Nice arguments all around
Cycle end or not?
#haikuspeakingfeelslikeyoda

Hi.

Regarding cycle: Both. Cycle theory is still in effect, meaning that this cycle is over. At the same time, we have not bounced out of the bull market yet... So go figure!!!!

I don't know what takes us out of this particular bull market. I suppose if we go below the 100-WMA for any meaningful amount of time (which is currently $83.6k).. that might help to take us out of it.. but going below the 100WMA with some kind of conviction might really help.. which would be a bit devastating to see folks actually selling at that price, unless it were to just be paper bitcoin playing some attempted manipulation, which might not end well for them..

Of course, with price movements there is a time element and there is also an amount of movement element too, so maybe the next two weeks are critical^tm, to see what happens to dee cornz, if anything, or will we continue to just be stuck in our current $86k to $94k narrow range for extended periods, or maybe we will be stuck in a broader $82k to $108k range or maybe we can bounce out of such broader range in order to get real and meaningful relief?

From my perspective, it is like an ongoing toss-up situation. What else is new?

We have been in these kind of toss up places in previous times and for long periods of time, and no one really knows what might or might not happen when we are in a toss up area, even though HODLers get frustrated by the lack of up that seems to be happening.

It was supposed to be the case that we were out of the stucked-ness range on December 26th from the closing of the end of the month options, but that has been almost 2 days ago and we are still flat as a pancake in the past two days.

Is someone trying to kill us through boredom?

Quote from: BTCETFInvestor on December 28, 2025, 05:15:57 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 28, 2025, 04:07:03 PM

My full name is Philip M.... = (middle) A.... = (last)
no-one I have found has that name but me.
I have searched my full name on the net since 1997 only I show up.
In retrospect using my full name for me email in 1996 was not a good choice for privacy.

But I was not a particularly rich person just working middle class guy.
In fact I was yet to have owned a new car in 1996.
So I had no issues about my privacy.

Phil - Yeah, you do have an extremely rare last name, and when putting your first and middle name with it - your full name is the only one on the planet! It's definitely not a Smith, Jones, Johnson or Williams! Even your wife has a relatively rare last name.

This is getting sicker and sicker... and Phil is just playing along with the further and further and further unnecessary, irrelevant and even invasive probing.

Quote from: Biodom on December 28, 2025, 06:28:20 PM

Femininity is being scorned at, though, with 90-100lb lady(ies) kicking the asses of the burly 230-250lb men, allegedly, as depicted in "Furiosa".

For sure, problematic to detach so thoroughly with reality - and the tragedies of sex alteration surgery in young folk is problematic too.. .. which is it any worse to be thinking that man can actually travel to places outside of earth to live? There can be some value in fantasy, yet it gets a bit detached from reality sometimes... .. which even life extension frequently seems more of a fantasy rather than a reality.

JJG - I may send Phil an email just to say howdy - but just to make you OpSec happy, I'd do it from one of my alias accounts. Cheesy

Quote from: bitmover on December 28, 2025, 11:33:00 PM

You guys are being too paranoid. There isn't much problem to use public wifi when gambling, using cryptoexchanges or whatever (as long as your device isn't infected with malware).

The casino will identify that the user is using a public network, it can be determined (with high probability) using the IP. Public networks such as airports have a different IP than a private network.

Yes, I agree. When you use a VPN you also share your connection with other people so you are changing one problem for the other if you think casinos will ban you because of the same connection from many accounts.

And I think with https and encryption there is no need to use VPN for security reasons anymore. VPN is good if you want privacy and if you don't want the connection provider to know what website you access, but this is the only reason to use a VPN now.

Quote from: Brizi5000 on Today at 05:11:21 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 12:00:10 AM

There is no need to try to talk nice about trading. It is a dumb thing to do - except maybe someone trying to learn trading and/or unable to control their inclinations to degenerately gamble, then maybe they could at least limit the size of their trading to be no more than 10% the size of their bitcoin investment.. without cheating.. Without taking more out of bitcoin to trade, so if they start out with 10% into trading, then every time they get paid and they allocate funds into bitcoin investment, they can take 10% of that to put into their trading funds.

Yeah, they are quite likely to lose money on their trading funds, especially after a couple of cycles, yet if they are able to control themselves they can measure and find out if they are even able to keep up their trading for 8 years.. and you never know... Maybe they might have figured out some system to not lose money relative to their investment holdings.

I agree with you that trading is really a dumb thing to do as far as bitcoin investment is concerned, anyone trading his bitcoin for quick profit is losing a lot, because in the future they will be the one regretting and saying had i know. look at examples of those who invested in bitcoin some years back, lets say 7 or 6 years ago and were able to hold it till this present time, and those who bought same years but couldn't hold themselves and they sell immediately for quick profit, you will see that those who were able to accumulate consistently and hold till now are probably having the last laugh, while those who couldn't remain consistent in accumulating and hold but decided to sell for quick profit are regretting their actions now.
And for all i know the only system they will want to figure out in order not to lose money is waiting for the dip to occur before they can buy bitcoin so that they will now sell immediately when they notice a quick rise in price which is also the dumbest thing to do because they will be waiting for the dip which might not even occur and they will miss out on several opportunities to add enough bitcoin stash to their portfolio, and some will even end up spending the money on something else because the dip have refused to come after waiting for so long which can cause them to abandon bitcoin investment totally.

That is correct.

The trader is in the wrong mindset, and even if he has great strategies, he is likely going to end up in times that he does not own any bitcoin and the bitcoin price shoots up (or goes up another step on the ladder without ever coming back down), and bitcoin has done such stair-stepping several times in its history.

It is almost impossible to know when the stair stepping will occur.

Another thing is that a beginner bitcoiner (who is a normal person) usually does not have a lump sum that they can start out buying bitcoin and then figure out some sell price target so that they can then establish a buy back price target, and frequently they would have had been better to not sell and then also to just keep buying on a regular basis as their money comes in.

Let's say that a person in his mid 30's who has an income of $30k had been investing in non-bitcoin investments in his 10 years prior to getting into bitcoin, started buying bitcoin 7 years ago (like in your example - let's say December 1, 2018), and he had around $50k in his regular investments (so he wanted to take $10k out to buy bitcoin) and then thereafter he would buy $100 per week. His goal was to be able to reach a point in which he can start to withdraw somewhere in the $80k per year from his bitcoin in 10-ish to 15-ish years, and he had a bit of flexibility in his timeline and he considers that his income might end up going up and he might be able to figure out ways to be more efficient in his spending, so he would likely increase his investment into bitcoin around 5% per year, so maybe we can say that he already averaged in vesting around $140 per week since December 1, 2018.

His initial investment of $10k ended up getting him 2.2 BTC, and his investing at $140 per week starting on December 1, 2018 caused him to invest $52k and to get 3 BTC up until now. So therefore right now he had invested about $62k, and he has 5.2 BTC, which right now would support an income of about $29k per year, yet he wants to get to a point of being able to support an $80k per year income..

Maybe right now he is in his early 40s and he is making about $45k per year, and he figures that in the next 3-4 years, he would continue to invest anywhere between $160 to $220 per week into bitcoin, and he considers that by mid 2029 he will have more than 6 BTC, which he considers to be enough or more than enough to be able to start to withdraw at a pace of $80k per year. And, surely, if he employs a sustainable withdrawal system, he is likely to be able to increase his withdrawal amount by 7% in dollar terms, each year.

None of this sound unrealistic for a person who might have had stayed serious in his accumulation, and sure, some folks cannot start with a lump sum, and they have to merely put together their weekly bitcoin buys from their income as it is coming in, and they have to figure an amount that is as aggressive as they are able to make it to be without overdoing it, since they will get set back if they overdo it, so whatever amount that they are able to invest into bitcoin, they may well need to also make sure that they are building up their cashflow management systems/practices (which means back up funds) as well. Anyone who insufficiently accounts for back up funds is putting himself into a position in which his bitcoin investment will be at risk.. so there should be a priority in protecting the bitcoin investment and making sure to have enough (or more than enough back up funds) at each step of the journey in building up the bitcoin investment size.

Quote from: Obulis on Today at 06:01:41 PM

Quote from: red4slash on December 27, 2025, 09:33:25 PM

Quote from: Lembo69 on December 27, 2025, 03:42:37 PM

You can invest your money wherever you want. It is completely up to you. But if you can invest in Bitcoin, it can be the best investment of your life.
Long-term investment is able to bring profits in the long term. The biggest challenge of an investor is to survive in the market.

There is no certainty about this because we must remember that bitcoin is risky and whether or not the results are the best or not, we ourselves determine whether we are willing to be at risk and ready for all forms of consequences or not.
Being in bitcoin is indeed very profitable but not all who are in bitcoin will end well so this needs to be a consideration for those who want to be in bitcoin in order to prepare mentally in advance before really jumping in because not a few of those who are fomo but have a bad mentality actually have to end up with destruction in the end.

In addition, long-term investment does not make sure that we will profit especially when talking about the risks that are owned in bitcoin. We must remember that being in the long term in bitcoin is actually only to minimize risk not as a benchmark in profit even though the hope remains to profit but in bitcoin nothing can really be ascertained considering this is a risky asset.

Well red4slash you can not get carried away with the fact that Bitcoin is not a guaranteed investment. So far, Bitcoin investment has proven itself to profited at least more than 85% of long-term hodlers and has failed over 90% of traders if not more. In as much as it's not a guaranteed venturing, the already existing fact of percentage profit for long-term hodling is the key point and the encouragement to still carry on with the already working long-term approach.

Yes. We can see from bitcoin's price history that the long term investors in bitcoin would all be in profits right now as long as they errored on the side of buying bitcoin and holding it. If they sold their bitcoin or tried to trade it, then it is difficult to know their results.

Regarding the future, even though bitcoin's investment thesis seems ongoingly strong, we do not know its future price performance. We also don't know aspects of our own execution risk management and if we are going to be successful in the future or make mistakes.

It is problematic to view the future in certainties rather than in probabilistic terms. Sure, once the future plays out it has become certain at that time, yet if it is still in the future, then it is probabilistic with knowns, unknowns and some of them have higher likelihoods of happening than others, yet some of them are dependent on the happening or the non-happening of others.

Quote from: Grace333 on Today at 06:38:50 PM

Quote from: Tamaperdana on Today at 11:38:29 AM

Quote from: Abelly on Today at 08:40:08 AM

A trader Always has the right thinking plan, management and patience are important, they do not chase profits, they consider the momentum first, and on the other hand, beginners want to make more money in shortcuts, this is the biggest problem, this is why long-term investment in trading is the most for new users, and Dca is more secure, the impact of market fluctuations is reduced and the mental stress is less, only then should you think about trading, before that, seeing Bitcoin as a long-term asset and being patient is the best way.

I feel like you're saying that trading is okay as long as you can control your emotions and manage risk well, but I don't think that's really the case. Because believe me, trading is not something that can be done easily. Because basically, the risks are very high. Because I also tried trading for a while, and even though I learned a lot, I still couldn't do anything. That's why I've come to the conclusion that investing in Bitcoin is far better and safer. Because I've experienced it myself, trading is not an easy thing to do. So rather than letting ourselves and our money fall into a high-risk abyss, it's better to just invest in Bitcoin. Because when you invest in Bitcoin, it certainly won't interfere with your work in the real world. Therefore, I believe we should not make the wrong move, because if we make even one wrong move, believe me, it will shatter your mentality.

I get you, trading can sound simple on the surface, but once you are inside it, you just realize how brutal it is. The risk is not just about money, it is mental. You can study, practice, learn strategies, and still end up on the wrong side of the market. One wrong move and you have mess with your confidence and mindset.

That is why I agree that trading is not for everyone. Even with discipline and risk management, it is still very demanding and time consuming. I will just advise anyone to stay away if possible, because sometimes it even affects your real life work if you are not careful.

If bitcoin's already existing pattern is that you need to be in bitcoin on around 10 days of the year in order to be profitable, and if you are fucking around trading, then you might not be in bitcoin on the days that you need to be in bitcoin in order to be profitable, so you end up fucking up an otherwise good thing because you choose to play around trying to trade it, and then you miss out because you are on in on the days that you need to be in. Sure, you might get lucky, yet it seems problematic to be trying to take chances, when bitcoin has been one of the best, if not the best place to put money, especially over 4-10 years or longer... and sure the longer that a person has been building their bitcoin stack, the better the personal financial results... especially for those just buying and holding and not trying to trade or to sell and to try to buy back cheaper.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:24:47 PM

I think there are too much campaigns forcing users to post there, which is unnecessary and incentives spam (imo). But it also incentives community support, which is good.

Premier League Discussion, La Liga Discussion, so on and so forth are full of spam? Yes, we can find spam on several pages, but i think the interaction in those threads changes, each week has its own discussion based on the performances of the teams on how they concluded the fixtures.

I'm asking for clarity, do you consider mega threads like the above to be truly low valued, considering there is always new events to discuss each week for a whole 35-38 league matches?

Quote from: asUHWEceyc on Today at 04:49:15 PM

Quote from: Biodom on December 27, 2025, 06:40:09 PM

Found on reddit:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1pwi5pc/30_bitcoin_cycle_top_indicators_zero_triggered/
The thesis is that there are only two possibilities:
1. All previously designed top indicators (my comment-except the number of days passed post halving) are faulty.
2. This was not the top.

I think that the top was not in, but the day passed and a perfect fit with expected plus the diminishing return projected value might suggest otherwise.
Currently, I am 70:30 on this (70%-not yet, 30% -yes, we did hit the top in October).

Alternatively, we are switching to a more stock-market-like cycles with unpredictable ebbs and flows.

The 200dma was pierced on 11/04 for only the third time since mid-23: 1)for 8 days fully, but around two weeks back in 9/24 bottoming at 10% below; and 2)for a couple days in a less sustained manner circa Liberation Day `25. This has by far been the deepest, longest sustained correction since 2022.
But, we're still floating well above Jay's favorite 200wma metric (true bear indicator IMO) and a mere ~30% off the lackluster high, however it's approaching 2 months under the prior lowest level.

If 4year astrology proves to still be a thing, there's at least 9ish months of sideways-downity remaining: a dumbfoundingly difficult task with Trump Inc. pamping eet in an election year. $1776, 2026, etc

Quote from: asUHWEceyc on November 06, 2025, 01:51:36 PM

4-year Cycle Rules

~~Bear low does not violate prior ATH~~
~~Previous ATH is not exceeded until after halving~~
Q4 of year following halving yields parabolic* ATH
Subsequent 12-24 month bear market, 78+% drawdown

_{_{_{_*llamabolic}}}

Even though I frequently proclaim that I don't know where we are going, the 200-WMA can tell us where we are at.. and so we can see how far the BTC price is relative to the 200-WMA, which currently with the BTC price at $87,6000 and the 200-WMA at $56,700, we are about 55% above the 200-WMA.

Why use any other indicator, except maybe because other folks are using other indicators?

The 100-WMA can be helpful to see when the BTC price might get stuck between the 100-WMA and the 200-WMA.. then maybe that could be a sign that we are in a bear market or to confirm that we had entered a bear market. The 100-WMA is right around $83,600. By the way the 100-WMA can also be referred to as the 2 year moving average.

A problem with these indicators is that they can be gamed.. so then maybe if we stay below a price (such as the 100-WMA) for long enough, then maybe we will start to conclude that we have transitioned into a bear market.

I suppose that ultimately I like the 200-WMA since so far it is always moving up and it tends to take out a lo tof the shorter-term noise.. so it tells us where we are at, but not necessarily where we are going.. ..same with any of the indicators, even though surely we might try to extract some data from the various indicators to throw in a predictive element into the mix.

Of course, if you translate the 200 DMA into the weekly moving average then that is merely the 7 week moving average, which seems a bit short, which I suppose is the point, since we can compare the shorter with the longer and come up with some ideas about whetehr the trend has changed or if the trend is moving in a certain direction.

Quote from: JimboToronto on Today at 04:56:18 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 27, 2025, 09:18:43 PM

I suppose the Doctors (et al) are working to figure out your diagnosis. Hopefully nothing too serious.

Quickly looking at some pulse oximeter information, I see that even below 92% could be worrisome if it is an accurate reading and not due to measuring device errors... so loss of consciousness and brain damage could start to kick in when in the lower 80%s... so it seems that 70% would have had put you into unconsciousness...and brain dead.. so hopefully that low measurement was due to measurement variability rather than reading an accurate blood/oxygen level.

It didn't take them long to figure out what was wrong... common pneumonia. You probably know that streptococcus pneumoniae normally exists in all our bodies and will develop into pneumonia when we are weakened by other diseases. I knew I'd picked up some kind of flu or other virus several weeks ago. I guess that triggered the pneumonia. Before I even called a cab I started myself on prednisone which my respirologist had given to me to use at my discretion in case of an emergency. At the hospital they quickly started me on amoxiclav and continued my prednisone.

My main reason to stay was oxygen. Because of the holiday short staffing, there was a bit of a mixup. The nurses monitoring my oxygen levels tried to keep my oximeter readings up in the high nineties. When an actual respirologist came in and saw what was happening she explained that after years of COPD my system had adapted and that my new normal was the 88-92 range and that the occasional dips into the high 70s was acceptable. By late yesterday we'd achieved these levels without extra oxygen so they discharged me.

They just make up shit as they go.. so that they can release you without feeling legally liable.

Cheesy

I am glad that things were pinpointed and the issue was not more serious - or at least if you have a path forward to potentially just to get back to what you had been in previously and assuming recovery after taking the antibiotics and the steroids. I heard that people can have issues with prednisone.. as with any systematic medications.

Do you smoke or vape?

Quote from: Greyhats on Today at 05:05:29 PM

Popped in to say hi
Nice arguments all around
Cycle end or not?
#haikuspeakingfeelslikeyoda

Hi.

Regarding cycle: Both. Cycle theory is still in effect, meaning that this cycle is over. At the same time, we have not bounced out of the bull market yet... So go figure!!!!

I don't know what takes us out of this particular bull market. I suppose if we go below the 100-WMA for any meaningful amount of time (which is currently $83.6k).. that might help to take us out of it.. but going below the 100WMA with some kind of conviction might really help.. which would be a bit devastating to see folks actually selling at that price, unless it were to just be paper bitcoin playing some attempted manipulation, which might not end well for them..

Of course, with price movements there is a time element and there is also an amount of movement element too, so maybe the next two weeks are critical^tm, to see what happens to dee cornz, if anything, or will we continue to just be stuck in our current $86k to $94k narrow range for extended periods, or maybe we will be stuck in a broader $82k to $108k range or maybe we can bounce out of such broader range in order to get real and meaningful relief?

From my perspective, it is like an ongoing toss-up situation. What else is new?

We have been in these kind of toss up places in previous times and for long periods of time, and no one really knows what might or might not happen when we are in a toss up area, even though HODLers get frustrated by the lack of up that seems to be happening.

It was supposed to be the case that we were out of the stucked-ness range on December 26th from the closing of the end of the month options, but that has been almost 2 days ago and we are still flat as a pancake in the past two days.

Is someone trying to kill us through boredom?

Quote from: BTCETFInvestor on Today at 05:15:57 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on Today at 04:07:03 PM

My full name is Philip M.... = (middle) A.... = (last)
no-one I have found has that name but me.
I have searched my full name on the net since 1997 only I show up.
In retrospect using my full name for me email in 1996 was not a good choice for privacy.

But I was not a particularly rich person just working middle class guy.
In fact I was yet to have owned a new car in 1996.
So I had no issues about my privacy.

Phil - Yeah, you do have an extremely rare last name, and when putting your first and middle name with it - your full name is the only one on the planet! It's definitely not a Smith, Jones, Johnson or Williams! Even your wife has a relatively rare last name.

This is getting sicker and sicker... and Phil is just playing along with the further and further and further unnecessary, irrelevant and even invasive probing.

Quote from: Biodom on Today at 06:28:20 PM

Femininity is being scorned at, though, with 90-100lb lady(ies) kicking the asses of the burly 230-250lb men, allegedly, as depicted in "Furiosa".

For sure, problematic to detach so thoroughly with reality - and the tragedies of sex alteration surgery in young folk is problematic too.. .. which is it any worse to be thinking that man can actually travel to places outside of earth to live? There can be some value in fantasy, yet it gets a bit detached from reality sometimes... .. which even life extension frequently seems more of a fantasy rather than a reality.

Quote from: Potato Chips on December 27, 2025, 11:10:04 PM

I don't think we have to exit at the top. I mean, in an ideal world sure, but predicting the top has always been hard, don't beat yourself up if you didn't exit at the top or near the top. It happens. As long as you're in profit, you're good.

But to be honest, with bitcoin, I still think we haven't topped yet lol because crypto adoption has just started, and more folks will jump in over time.

Predictions are hard to accurate and timing the market when it happens is harder. Combining price prediction and the time is impossible so just don't try to do the hard things.

Investment with DCA, buying bitcoin regularly with time, and holding your bitcoin with time for profit. Investors can have plans to accumulate and hold in one cycle, two or three cycles, even longer, but when they want to take profit, they can sell gradually too. It's like DCA out for taking profit that does not need to time the market for the top for exits.

This strategy of JJG can help too.
[ANN] JJG Sustainable Bitcoin Withdrawal Strategy
https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on Today at 02:35:39 PM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:24:47 PM

Quote from: libert19 on Today at 12:11:16 PM

...

I partly agree as well. I don't know if people think that discussions on other gambling forums are at the level of statistics professors.

Personally, I ain't fan of any particular type of discussions, just be genuine/authentic, it's all I care for.

Quote

I already stated my unpopular opinion. AI is a great tool for translating, and if you want to avoid accusations of plagiarism for using it for that purpose, here's a system that complies with the rules of bitcointalk:

How to use AI for translation without getting tagged or posts deleted.

Ok, that's a good one, and I agree with it.

Quote from: MinMan on Today at 03:08:51 PM

Here is mine:

The late adopters of bitcoin, yet to born (or bitcoin is too costly to invest).

Many are worrying on current high price of bitcoin to invest with. But in my opinion, we need to console ourselves with the future prices like $1M or $10M. When all 21 million supply to be mined out only after 100+ years, I am sure that the people who are accumulating right now are still in early phase only. If bitcoin is costing ~100k for early adopters, how much it would cost for late adopters? So, go for DCA freely coz it is still cheaper.

It's not pertaining to forum but ok.

Quote from: joker_josue on Today at 08:38:31 AM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:38:40 AM

Houve realmente um crescimento alto de meritos em circulação na aba local, que se consolidou nesses últimos 6 meses do ano. muito bom, muito graças a particpação do joker_josue.

Faz-se o que se pode...

Por outro lado, temos tido uma pequena baixa de atividade, face o que tínhamos alguns meses atras. Mas, continua haver boa qualidade, que é o mais importante.

A nossa board portuguesa só não é a maior por conta da quantidade, porém acredito que apesar de ser board menor, temos membros de qualidade de sobra.

Eu espero estar contribuindo também, quem me conhece sabe que eu não economizo em enviar sMerits, principalmente quando eu vejo um post de qualidade!

Apesar de que, tem membro aí que nunca mais me enviou merit, será por contraste de posicionamento político? Cheesy

Não que eu precise de mais merits, já que sou Legendary, eu não preciso mais subir de rank, mas tem coisas que a gente percebe Grin

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:24:47 PM

Quote from: libert19 on Today at 12:11:16 PM

I'll start by posting mine (this is my opinion, and you are free to disagree).

— Gambling discussion sub is not spam fest as it's usually deemed as.

I don't find it that way. But, I do not discount my ignorance here — I could feeling this way because I may have become 'comfortable' to spam that I don't find it spammy anymore!?

Off you go.

I partly agree.

I do think there is too much spam there. But there are some good discussions in the ANN of most casinos. Basically community support, which is by no mean spam.

I partly agree as well. I don't know if people think that discussions on other gambling forums are at the level of statistics professors. There are high-level discussions alongside opinions from degenerate gamblers trying to justify strategies such as the martingale with the most bizarre arguments.

I already stated my unpopular opinion. AI is a great tool for translating, and if you want to avoid accusations of plagiarism for using it for that purpose, here's a system that complies with the rules of bitcointalk:

How to use AI for translation without getting tagged or posts deleted.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:38:40 AM

Houve realmente um crescimento alto de meritos em circulação na aba local, que se consolidou nesses últimos 6 meses do ano. muito bom, muito graças a particpação do joker_josue.

Faz-se o que se pode...

Por outro lado, temos tido uma pequena baixa de atividade, face o que tínhamos alguns meses atras. Mas, continua haver boa qualidade, que é o mais importante.

Quote from: rdluffy on December 26, 2025, 09:45:02 AM

Após rodar o sorteio, o ganhador é:

Pode ser conferido no https://bitcoindata.science/giveaway-manager/

Obrigado pela participação de todos

alegotardo, é só me enviar seu endereço BTC

Mas óia só! Por essa nem eu esperava, esse fim de ano está sendo muito melhor do que eu esperava, agora só falta ganhar na mega da virada... sim, eu fiz meu bolão, não me julguem, pra ocmpensar eu prometo investir boa parte do valor em Bitcoins Tongue

Meu caro @rdluffy, pode enviar o pagamento para o endereço que está aqui no meu perfil mesmo, por favor: 3ALeGtaRdZXnPMmETeHaD3hrSxhz3sQinW

Quote from: sabotag3x on December 26, 2025, 02:44:59 PM

Quote from: rdluffy on December 26, 2025, 09:45:02 AM

Após rodar o sorteio, o ganhador é: alegotardo

O universo tem seus preferidos mesmo.. o @alegotardo sempre vence esses sorteios Cheesy

parabéns!

Bom final de ano para todos, especialmente para você que organizou mais um sorteio @rdluffy!

Nem vem, acho que esse é segundo ou terceiro premio que eu ganho nesses 8 anos de bitcointalk, nem mesmo na aba de Collectibles onde já participei muito eu ganhei algo até hoje.

Enfim, obrigado e parabéns pelo sorteio @rdluffy, sabemos que mais do que o prêmio em BTC, o verdadeiro valor desses sorteios é o engajamento que ele gera aqui.

Quote from: DanWalker on Today at 07:20:34 AM

Quote from: Fuso.hp on Today at 06:43:30 AM

In the next ten years, Bitcoin will reach a very good level in terms of popularity and we will see many positive changes in the market price of Bitcoin. If we want to get an idea about the next ten years by comparing it with the last 10 years, then the idea about Bitcoin is clear in front of us because we have seen that the popularity of Bitcoin has increased every year in the last ten years. But it is not like that in some years the popularity of Bitcoin has increased and in some years the popularity of Bitcoin has decreased. Maybe the price of Bitcoin has fluctuated, but overall the price of Bitcoin has touched the highest record this year. I have full confidence in the market and I think the Bitcoin market can touch one million dollars in the next 10 years, and I am investing with that target.

Bitcoin adoption is ongoing, and with fiat currencies losing value over time, it is almost certain that bitcoin will increase in price over the next 10 years.

However, although bitcoin has consistently reached ATH this year, we need to make one thing clear here. From 2021 to 2025, bitcoin increased from $69k to $126k, an increase of only about 80% in the last 4 years. Thereby, it is not too difficult to realize that the more mature bitcoin becomes, the slower its growth rate becomes.

Is it realistic to expect bitcoin to increase tenfold in the next 10 years?

I suggest that your measuring historical BTC prices from top to top is an inferior way to measure bitcoin, and it is likely better to measure bottom to bottom, including the use of averages (the 200-WMA) rather than spot price.

Currently the 200-WMA is $56,671, and [urlhttps://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy?U2FsdGVkX1+irzAPCq0pjnfyJXXUx16H4EyVJuP7sYCMqRBwXskCPJ6c4+W7Wnzxy+eDhhBwTHewHPGmU5TbhA==]4 years ago, the 200-WMA was $18,582[/url] - which is a 3x increase in the 200-WMA over the past 4 years.

Quote from: Alone055 on Today at 08:17:30 AM

Quote from: DanWalker on Today at 07:20:34 AM

[edited out]

Wait, you are not making that calculation correctly, because $69k was the all-time high of Bitcoin in the last bull run, but it then went to $16k in the bear market, and then reached $126k in this bull run. So, technically, it increased 10 folds within that period, and if someone had bought at the bottom and kept holding until the recent times, they could easily get more than 9x in profits. So it's not like one can't get good profits, but it all depends on when they buy and then sell.

I agree that one shouldn't expect to get rich through Bitcoin investments anymore because that opportunity is long gone, but we can still get good profits if we buy during the bear market and then keep holding until the bull run and sell when the price is pretty high. Those who didn't sell when Bitcoin's price was above $120k are now regretting it because they could get good returns if they had done it.

There could be some value to measure from bottom to top rather than top to top, even though you are likely getting exaggerated depictions.

Another problem is your assumption that it would be a good idea to try to buy at the bottom and sell at the top, even if guys were to be capable of identifying such price extremes. Bitcoin seems like a much better investment rather than a thing that guys should be trying to gamble with.

If a person is investing rather than trading or gambling, then he would likely be spending way more time, energy and value to just ongoingly accumulate bitcoin for his first cycle or two of being involved in bitcoin. Of course, if he is able to reallocate from some other asset into bitcoin, then he can front load his bitcoin investment, yet most folks tend to have to invest from their regular income and/or other ways of gradually acquiring a bitcoin position rather than being able to front load their bitcoin investment. In other words it seems a bit short-sighted to be trying to trade bitcoin rather than building up the holdings over time, such as 4-10 years or beyond... .so the initial stages is buying bitcoin ONLY and not selling. There is no guarantee that a person will increase his bitcoin stash by selling, so it is better to just remove selling as part of the bitcoin accumulation strategy.

Time has come for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, this time a little bit later than in previous months. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet.

Post activity per local board during November 2025

After the last month's increase this time we have a drop of activity; from October's 14463 posts we dropped down to 13826 posts in November. Majority of this drop happened due decreased activity in two of the most active boards, Nigerian and Russian. Drop is not huge, therefore not concerning and I am confident that it was just a little bit weaker month.

Active members per local board during November 2025

During the last month, 1445 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards that are part of this overview, which is almost exactly the same as in October (1446). To be honest, I expected bigger drop than that considering the drop of the number of posts, but I guess people just wrote less, nothing else.

No changes at the top; Nigerian board far ahead the other, and Russia behind on the 2nd, after many years of dominating this, and majority of the other charts.

Local board members per amount of posts during November 2025

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during November, leader is Polish local board with 58%, while at the same time Pilipinas board had only 12% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French board with 67%, while Arabic board had the lowest percentage, only 25%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Portuguese and Pilipinas share the first spot, each having 53% of such members, while Romanian board had no members who wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during November 2025

During November, 7414 merit was shared across local board, which is a big drop compared to October's 8427 merit. The main cause of this major drop can be found in Nigerian board, whose number of merit shared went from 2241 to 1565. Other boards contributed to this drop as well, but majority of this is decreased happened there. Drop would be much bigger if German board didn't have a big increase in the same period.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during November 2025

In November, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.54, which is an expected decrease compared to October's 0.56 and is continuation of the trend for several months now.

After losing the first spot for a couple of months, German local board is back at the top with a very high 1.66 ratio, but few others like Spanish, Italian, Arabic and Italian also have over 1+ merit per post which is an excellent ratio.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during November 2025

During November, 536 members sent while 610 received merit, which is an expected drop compared to October (654 senders and 685 receivers) due fewer merit shared.

Merit per transaction across local boards during November 2025

And for the end, the chart that shows us merit habits of each board. Arabic remained at the top, while German local board is not that far behind with also a very high merit per tx ratio, which is not surprise given their high merit per post ratio.

The most active members per local board during November 2025

Last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. This time the most active member was Julien_Olynpic from Russian local with 137 posts, close 2nd was joker_josue from Portuguese localwho wrote 135 posts while 3rd was the most active member of Turkish board, mandown, who wrote 127 posts. Keep it up guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Julien_Olynpic [137]	\|	1. MaxMueller [72]	\|	1. mandown [127]	\|	1. Plutosky [68]	\|	1. joker_josue [135]	\|	1. darxiaomi [39]	\|
2. klarki [116]	\|	2. mole0815 [71]	\|	2. Phoenix Anka [61]	\|	2. gbianchi [47]	\|	2. sabotag3x [73]	\|	2. famososMuertos [29]	\|
3. zasad@ [56]	\|	3. Unknown01 [57]	\|	3. Mustang Shelby [60]	\|	3. arulbero [45]	\|	3. bitmover [53]	\|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	\|
4. Alex077 [55]	\|	4. willi9974 [55]	\|	4. blomen [60]	\|	4. Ace [41]	\|	4. alegotardo [42]	\|	4. danadc [28]	\|
5. eisen33 [44]	\|	5. MinoRaiola [50]	\|	5. Hvdv [58]	\|	5. fillippone [39]	\|	5. Forsyth Jones [38]	\|	5. Porfirii [26]	\|
6. Numeral [43]	\|	6. cygan [47]	\|	6. xzone [57]	\|	6. Lillominato89 [28]	\|	6. TryNinja [34]	\|	6. Hispo [15]	\|
7. KTChampions [40]	\|	7. Koal-84 [37]	\|	7. kriminall [56]	\|	7. babo [26]	\|	7. mikel_012 [25]	\|	7. Crystal-Trade.org [13]	\|
8. PerfectumR [39]	\|	8. 5tift [35]	\|	8. yenerbatmaz [48]	\|	8. Italian Panic [25]	\|	8. rdluffy [21]	\|	8. sausalitox [8]	\|
9. xandry [37]	\|	9. Lakai01 [31]	\|	9. ingiltere [44]	\|	9. Ale88 [24]	\|	9. davipinheiro [20]	\|	9. Filicius [6]	\|
10. Unsoldier [36]	\|	10. x3t9fi [28]	\|	10. ZekiBeyy [43]	\|	10. Paolo.Demidov [19]	\|	10. velhoti [19]	\|	10. darbitmobilerecovery [5]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. AakZaki [33]	\|	1. patrickus [11]	\|	1. blockman [55]	\|	1. slackovic [50]	\|	1. Jubilee58 [81]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [32]	\|
2. MAAManda [31]	\|	2. Danydee [8]	\|	2. gunhell16 [52]	\|	2. ovcijisir [32]	\|	2. Floxynice [71]	\|	2. yhiaali3 [27]	\|
3. traderethereum [30]	\|	3. Saint-loup [4]	\|	3. tech30338 [52]	\|	3. katanic97 [27]	\|	3. Charles-Tim [63]	\|	3. khaled0111 [24]	\|
4. Maaop7 [26]	\|	4. GrosWesh [4]	\|	4. cryptoaddictchie [40]	\|	4. Rikafip [25]	\|	4. PremiumcryptoHub [59]	\|	4. GxSTxV [11]	\|
5. FunshareNesialMLMPenipu [24]	\|	5. winspiral [3]	\|	5. arwin100 [31]	\|	5. Pmalek [24]	\|	5. Africolo [58]	\|	5. Ochan_yazo_tochant [7]	\|
6. blue Snow [22]	\|	6. TryNinja [3]	\|	6. finaleshot2016 [29]	\|	6. dkbit98 [15]	\|	6. Agbe [40]	\|	6. hugeblack [4]	\|
7. Luzin [21]	\|	7. Halab [3]	\|	7. julerz12 [27]	\|	7. examplens [14]	\|	7. ArabBTC [39]	\|	7. RedFlix [4]	\|
8. Gaza13 [21]	\|	8. G.Seed [3]	\|	8. GreatArkansas [24]	\|	8. cryptofrka [13]	\|	8. SatoPrincess [37]	\|	8. 0x000369 [3]	\|
9. taufik123 [20]	\|	9. estenity [2]	\|	9. lionheart78 [22]	\|	9. Trofo [9]	\|	9. Agbamoni [36]	\|	9. Danydee [1]	\|
10. joniboini [20]	\|	10. EXMON [2]	\|	10. Questat [22]	\|	10. Daniel91 [7]	\|	10. Yablee0 [35]	\|	10. OmegaStarScream [1]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [10]	\|	1. Bitcoin Smith [28]	\|	1. cryptosize [30]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [7]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [74]	\|	1. Bd officer [22]	\|
2. pawel7777 [6]	\|	2. JSRAW [22]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [12]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	\|	2. Jaweria parveen [47]	\|	2. DYING_S0UL [16]	\|
3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. TSen [16]	\|	3. alani123 [4]	\|	3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. JunaidAzizi [41]	\|	3. Z_MBFM [14]	\|
4. EXMON [2]	\|	4. pawanjain [15]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [3]	\|	4. othell_rogue [1]	\|	4. MusaPk [27]	\|	4. Crypto Library [13]	\|
5. dominik_crypto [2]	\|	5. LucyFurr [15]	\|	5. Dimitris [1]	\|	5. fujn [1]	\|	5. Cheema02 [25]	\|	5. Review Master [13]	\|
6. Judicar [1]	\|	6. henmark [10]	\|	6. fujn [1]	\|	6. 0vi [1]	\|	6. ZAINmalik75 [20]	\|	6. God Of Thunder [12]	\|
7. fujn [1]	\|	7. TheUltraElite [9]	\|		\|	7. powray [1]	\|	7. Compromise me [19]	\|	7. Momin_Official [10]	\|
8. konopaki12 [1]	\|	8. so98nn [6]	\|		\|		\|	8. AgriTrack [18]	\|	8. BlackHatSojib [8]	\|
9. naglafar [1]	\|	9. Cointikka [5]	\|		\|		\|	9. BTC FutureKing [18]	\|	9. Btcloop [8]	\|
10. winqoo [1]	\|	10. M47AK16 [5]	\|		\|		\|	10. Doll2233 [18]	\|	10. Mahiyammahi [5]	\|

Update:
DT 1
1. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1724 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10044 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 3280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (3) 8992 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1888 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (10) 6346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1852 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 12625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 6533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6521 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 3269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9348 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +138 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3508 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11100 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11258 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 525 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4500 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 4204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (57) 19708 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2917 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1331 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1002 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3581 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +53 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6502 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +78 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 11079 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1318 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2188 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1986 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9031 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3139 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7189 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (7) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3687 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3182 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2414 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 5262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5221 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1489 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +41 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 3273 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1051 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 815 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1103 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7492 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3008 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8182 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (13807 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9257 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Weekly update (2025-12-19_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1766112631 2 5489893.msg66189546 1166480 958449
1766112612 3 5568630.msg66182755 379147 11425
1766110694 1 5522234.msg66190466 252510 3446246
1766110659 1 5522234.msg66187211 252510 3587685
1766110153 1 5568838.msg66188340 839568 33156
1766108374 1 5568871.msg66189836 33156 1349691
1766107289 1 5568838.msg66188340 3719408 33156
1766106442 1 5173493.msg66157234 1554927 846936
1766105529 1 178336.msg66190739 223922 67210
1766105458 1 178336.msg66189709 33156 198573
1766105020 1 178336.msg66190696 198573 252510
1766104686 1 5526798.msg64964344 3449242 2830659
1766104128 1 178336.msg66189473 223922 33156
1766103996 50 5143324.msg51070466 18321 15728
1766102349 1 5568262.msg66190542 1045971 317618
1766102023 2 5568657.msg66190363 1856852 1265260
1766101588 2 5489893.msg66150564 407174 382413
1766101282 1 5568613.msg66187131 1856852 1130307
1766101131 1 5456516.msg66188701 317618 3674660
1766100502 5 5568838.msg66188340 317618 33156
1766100323 1 178336.msg66190469 3547723 64507
1766100171 3 5568630.msg66182755 137773 11425
1766100142 1 5568630.msg66182755 137773 11425
1766099749 1 5132720.msg66190234 252510 3613441
1766099621 2 5568866.msg66189642 3322606 355846
1766099468 1 5568884.msg66190263 3547723 3704391
1766099269 1 5567984.msg66167702 3322558 3489395
1766098830 1 5568262.msg66179357 317618 459836
1766098753 1 5568885.msg66190454 3558380 3322606
1766098751 1 5132720.msg66189494 252510 3724979
1766098638 1 5568788.msg66187545 407174 2724574
1766098378 5 5548042.msg66115136 85033 3579677
1766098376 1 232519.msg66186624 2905746 3720043
1766097482 2 5444001.msg61881248 317618 1982152
1766097450 1 5444001.msg61879660 317618 1190631
1766097337 3 5444001.msg61877332 317618 2789068
1766097094 1 5568704.msg66184887 1410401 112493
1766097078 1 5568747.msg66189444 33156 317618
1766097049 1 5568747.msg66189039 33156 1269497
1766096912 3 5273824.msg66173638 1852120 557798
1766096210 2 781352.msg66188326 317618 71280
1766095914 1 178336.msg66188957 198573 1027389
1766095603 1 5561446.msg66186611 3704398 881377
1766095300 1 5568744.msg66186617 1410401 3719408
1766095259 1 5568787.msg66190034 839568 379487
1766095243 1 5568744.msg66186225 1410401 839568
1766095228 1 5568749.msg66190066 33156 1410401
1766095187 4 5568749.msg66189897 33156 3491360
1766095083 2 5548762.msg65550435 3730852 3570987
1766094663 1 5568838.msg66188340 2755547 33156
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (53 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2972 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:50:31 AM CET, Julien_Olynpic (history) sent 2 Merit to viljy (history) for Re: [***] Создаём экосистему токена Chamby .
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:50:12 AM CET, pooya87 (history) sent 3 Merit to gmaxwell (history) for Re: Bitcoin Testnet Needed: Prefer USA based Miners.
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:18:14 AM CET, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to moneystery (history) for Re: Everything you wanted to know about Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:17:39 AM CET, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Just Say (history) for Re: Everything you wanted to know about Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.
On Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:09:13 AM CET, AakZaki (history) sent 1 Merit to vapourminer (history) for bring back the glowing ignore button.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (566 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8182 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 828 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3739640: darkrangerat (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3739781: BigNoteh (history) earned: 4 Merit.
3739792: Wildead Casino (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3740057: Becassinewantstocomeback (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3740085: Taurox (history) earned: 4 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3736690: bxae00
3736722: Stilelibero
3736790: James tector
3736915: mrust_fridge
3736986: Showstopper1111
3737025: hmbdofficial
3737029: realmeh
3737125: FlyingDevilBB
3737150: ahmadhere
3737270: SawyerNolan
3737311: CONVOAI
3737401: Alge89
3737459: Akaenyi
3737471: LogosLRB
3737474: axcelvoid
3737623: DRY MARTINI
3737741: PlayRadar
3737767: krvbs
3737790: fabrice.btc
3737800: adilx157
3737826: BTC_Bae
3737986: KawasakiNinja_
3738006: FeWoWHV24
3738068: Coinjoiner21
3738090: rreplayworld
3738152: Fresh_Milk
3738205: xXHenneBXx
3738277: TheNextBigThinger0x0
3738491: meangoat
3738543: InvestigatingWOZX
3738697: art3m1s_37
3738700: KawasakiNinja1_
3738840: Rah12345
3738956: boombitty
3739036: Unixx
3739052: AmlRiskMonitor
3739109: Bjoern90
3739255: Amzender
3739266: NyktersteinMD
3739326: Raisero
3739388: Vanellp
3739483: JaredIbrahim
3739490: Blour
3739617: Chononaut
3739632: Sheylon
3739640: darkrangerat
3739781: BigNoteh
3739792: Wildead Casino
3740057: Becassinewantstocomeback
3740085: Taurox

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8182
4:0:828
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:723
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14216:13807
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:300
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1412
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3736690:2:29
3736722:0:1
3736790:0:13
3736915:0:1
3736986:0:8
3737025:0:2
3737029:0:26
3737125:0:1
3737150:0:1
3737270:0:1
3737311:0:3
3737401:0:1
3737459:0:3
3737471:0:2
3737474:0:22
3737623:0:5
3737741:0:1
3737767:0:2
3737790:1:7
3737800:0:4
3737826:0:3
3737986:0:1
3738006:0:1
3738068:2:8
3738090:0:2
3738152:0:1
3738205:0:8
3738277:0:1
3738491:0:1
3738543:0:1
3738697:5:12
3738700:0:1
3738840:0:6
3738956:0:1
3739036:2:5
3739052:0:3
3739109:0:2
3739255:0:1
3739266:0:1
3739326:0:1
3739388:1:5
3739483:0:10
3739490:0:2
3739617:0:1
3739632:0:1
3739640:0:1
3739781:0:4
3739792:0:1
3740057:1:2
3740085:0:4

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 50748
Sample

Code:

1. 19708 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1086 unique users in 11300 transactions
2. 19547 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 733 unique users in 10680 transactions
3. 18879 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9979 transactions
4. 14944 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8621 transactions
5. 13807 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1213 unique users in 4943 transactions
6. 12625 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 693 unique users in 8427 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11258 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 483 unique users in 6302 transactions
9. 11227 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 649 unique users in 6428 transactions
10. 11100 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 594 unique users in 6462 transactions
11. 11079 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 558 unique users in 4345 transactions
12. 10508 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 497 unique users in 5516 transactions
13. 10044 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 568 unique users in 5718 transactions
14. 9596 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 328 unique users in 4921 transactions
15. 9348 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 625 unique users in 5038 transactions
16. 9257 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 334 unique users in 3294 transactions
17. 9167 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 511 unique users in 4275 transactions
18. 9149 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 448 unique users in 4556 transactions
19. 9031 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 384 unique users in 3197 transactions
20. 8992 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 420 unique users in 4877 transactions
21. 8944 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 531 unique users in 4050 transactions
22. 8465 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 525 unique users in 4575 transactions
23. 8461 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4832 transactions
24. 8395 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 450 unique users in 4978 transactions
25. 8353 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 565 unique users in 4895 transactions
26. 8182 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 404 unique users in 882 transactions
27. 8110 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 394 unique users in 4243 transactions
28. 7522 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4110 transactions
29. 7492 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 450 unique users in 4157 transactions
30. 7189 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 571 unique users in 4261 transactions
31. 7122 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 401 unique users in 3634 transactions
32. 6639 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 226 unique users in 1710 transactions
33. 6533 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 273 unique users in 2959 transactions
34. 6521 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 367 unique users in 3279 transactions
35. 6502 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 379 unique users in 3538 transactions
36. 6353 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 923 unique users in 4118 transactions
37. 6346 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 473 unique users in 3527 transactions
38. 6201 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 618 unique users in 3468 transactions
39. 6195 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 196 unique users in 3592 transactions
40. 6118 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 218 unique users in 3579 transactions
41. 6112 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 407 unique users in 3549 transactions
42. 6012 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 194 unique users in 2628 transactions
43. 5989 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 518 unique users in 3480 transactions
44. 5969 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 405 unique users in 3253 transactions
45. 5965 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 450 unique users in 3347 transactions
46. 5965 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 225 unique users in 3378 transactions
47. 5952 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 324 unique users in 2766 transactions
48. 5642 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 201 unique users in 3246 transactions
49. 5350 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 412 unique users in 2626 transactions
50. 5262 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 440 unique users in 3745 transactions
.......
.......
.......
50699. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50700. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50701. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50702. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50703. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50704. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50705. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50706. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50707. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50708. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50709. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50710. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50711. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50712. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50713. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50714. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50715. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50716. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50717. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50718. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50719. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50720. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50721. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50722. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50723. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50724. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50725. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50726. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50727. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50728. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50729. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50730. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50731. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50732. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50733. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50734. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50735. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50736. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50737. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50738. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50739. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50740. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50741. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50742. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50743. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50744. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50745. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50746. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50747. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
50748. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26475
Sample

Code:

1. 69531 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 884 unique users in 12371 transactions
2. 65700 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2128 unique users in 28390 transactions
3. 64670 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3298 unique users in 17324 transactions
4. 56608 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4531 unique users in 32571 transactions
5. 56526 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3526 unique users in 54354 transactions
6. 46893 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3598 unique users in 32574 transactions
7. 42852 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2790 unique users in 15088 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 36875 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2490 unique users in 13682 transactions
10. 36696 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2817 unique users in 29717 transactions
11. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
12. 33312 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1567 unique users in 13617 transactions
13. 31368 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1439 unique users in 10172 transactions
14. 28208 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2059 unique users in 10153 transactions
15. 27434 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1667 unique users in 6519 transactions
16. 27117 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1382 unique users in 6953 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
20. 22068 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1337 unique users in 9277 transactions
21. 21322 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 600 unique users in 6403 transactions
22. 15915 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1925 unique users in 6452 transactions
23. 15592 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 731 unique users in 5740 transactions
24. 15419 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1697 unique users in 7176 transactions
25. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
26. 14848 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1642 unique users in 3733 transactions
27. 14549 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1145 unique users in 8757 transactions
28. 14387 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 528 unique users in 6729 transactions
29. 14216 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1101 unique users in 1741 transactions
30. 13989 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1275 unique users in 7970 transactions
31. 13502 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1586 unique users in 6895 transactions
32. 12970 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 654 unique users in 3563 transactions
33. 12728 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1321 unique users in 7179 transactions
34. 12652 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1301 unique users in 5797 transactions
35. 12618 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2927 unique users in 6710 transactions
36. 12552 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1109 unique users in 7623 transactions
37. 12516 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 815 unique users in 4163 transactions
38. 12280 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 802 unique users in 5881 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 10590 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1123 unique users in 5952 transactions
41. 10361 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 540 unique users in 3936 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8033 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3286 transactions
45. 8007 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1019 unique users in 3469 transactions
46. 7772 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 739 unique users in 6915 transactions
47. 7704 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 927 unique users in 3392 transactions
48. 7484 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 566 unique users in 6628 transactions
49. 7082 Merit sent by frodocooper (#988740) to 479 unique users in 2931 transactions
50. 6896 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 484 unique users in 5415 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26426. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26427. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26428. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26429. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26430. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26431. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26432. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26433. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26434. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26435. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26436. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26437. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26438. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26439. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26440. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26441. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26442. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26443. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26444. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26445. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26446. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26447. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26448. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26449. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26450. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26451. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26452. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26453. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26454. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26455. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26456. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26457. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26458. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26459. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26460. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26461. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26462. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26463. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26464. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26465. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26466. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26467. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26468. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26469. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26470. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26471. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26472. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26473. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26474. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26475. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 317431 (14.35%)
Tuesday 315615 (14.27%)
Wednesday 316688 (14.32%)
Thursday 337591 (15.27%)
Friday 335678 (15.18%)
Saturday 292385 (13.22%)
Sunday 295295 (13.35%)
Total: 2210683

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 07:03:20 PM

Quote from: icopress on Today at 02:47:20 AM

Quote from: Zwei on December 25, 2025, 10:05:22 PM

XMR to USDT fee for example, is still around 3% as you can see: [...]

Yes, but you don't take into account that this coin is quite specific and on similar exchanges the commissions vary from 4 to 6%.

It is common to see a higher fee in XMR pairs.

Even in eXch they charged a few more in XMR pairs, so they don`t handle out their XMR so easily (looks like many exchanges and p2p operators have problems with XMR liquidity).

I don`t see this as a problem. But BTC > USDT pairs (or others with high liquidity anywhere) should really have the lower fee possible.

As far as I know, one of the reasons that initiated the higher fees for XMR is that there is almost no trading of Monero on the traditional CEX, mainly because it was delisted. Traders used eXch for daily trade, and it was challenging for them to have enough reserves of XMR to sell, and sometimes enough BTC to buy XMR.
I'm not sure how much the fee increase solved the XRM liquidity problem on eXch, but it certainly helped enough.

All available slots are filled!

The current block number is 929610, so the winner will be selected in block 929620 using bitmover 🎁

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 02:35:50 AM

Quote from: joker_josue on December 25, 2025, 05:28:31 PM

@bitmover did you understand why those two images weren't generated?

No.

I see that it works sometimes and sometimes they image doesnt work.

I will keep an eye on it. But I wasn't able to upload an image to talkimg a few days ago, got some error. But it is working now...

Let's see if it works again in the next days

I understand what happened... The situation has already been resolved on TalkImg end.

Sometimes services give us the runaround, and we don't even know why. After hours without sleep, we find out. Wink

Meus amigos, a lista final ficou dessa forma:

Mindyspace
criptoevangelista
Pumared
bitmover
TryNinja
sabotag3x
Forsyth Jones
Paredao
alegotardo
Paredao
r_victory
sabotag3x
Pumared
criptoevangelista
CY4NiDE
alegotardo
ESG

Após rodar o sorteio, o ganhador é:

Pode ser conferido no https://bitcoindata.science/giveaway-manager/

Obrigado pela participação de todos

alegotardo, é só me enviar seu endereço BTC

Quote from: CCECash on Today at 02:31:48 AM

Quote from: Zwei on December 25, 2025, 10:05:22 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 09:06:23 PM

They used to charge about 3% fee in every swap (no deal for me in most situations)

the only thing that stops me from using cce.cash is the high fees. 3% is by no means a small fee, and if you swap regularly, it add up quickly and eats into your stash.

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 09:06:23 PM

I just made a simulation now, and it was less than 2% fee (about 1.9% fee)

it would have been great if that was for all coins, but it looks like the fee depends on the pairs you are swapping.
XMR to USDT fee for example, is still around 3% as you can see:

it would be nice if they were a bit more transparent about the fees.

Our transaction fees are structured as follows: Basic transfer fee + Rate-based fee.

The basic transfer fee is 1-2 USDT per currency pair. The rate-based fee varies between 0.5% and 2% depending on the currency pair.

For your example exchange of 1 XMR to 424.189 USDT-ERC20, the fee structure is: Basic transfer fee (1 USDT (XMR) += 1.5 USDT (ERC20) = 2.5 USDT) + Rate-based fee of 2% (435.396 * 2% = 8.707 USDT) = 11.207 USDT.

Because the total amount in your example exchange is too low, you might mistakenly believe our fee rate is 3%.

Sorry, your example likely used a fixed rate. I just calculated a variable rate. Our fixed rate is consistently 0.5% higher than the variable rate.

Quote from: Zwei on December 25, 2025, 10:05:22 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 09:06:23 PM

They used to charge about 3% fee in every swap (no deal for me in most situations)

the only thing that stops me from using cce.cash is the high fees. 3% is by no means a small fee, and if you swap regularly, it add up quickly and eats into your stash.

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 09:06:23 PM

I just made a simulation now, and it was less than 2% fee (about 1.9% fee)

it would have been great if that was for all coins, but it looks like the fee depends on the pairs you are swapping.
XMR to USDT fee for example, is still around 3% as you can see:

it would be nice if they were a bit more transparent about the fees.

Our transaction fees are structured as follows: Basic transfer fee + Rate-based fee.

The basic transfer fee is 1-2 USDT per currency pair. The rate-based fee varies between 0.5% and 2% depending on the currency pair.

For your example exchange of 1 XMR to 424.189 USDT-ERC20, the fee structure is: Basic transfer fee (1 USDT (XMR) += 1.5 USDT (ERC20) = 2.5 USDT) + Rate-based fee of 2% (435.396 * 2% = 8.707 USDT) = 11.207 USDT.

Because the total amount in your example exchange is too low, you might mistakenly believe our fee rate is 3%.

Quote from: Unsoldier on December 24, 2025, 06:59:05 PM

Quote from: Ruttoshi on December 24, 2025, 05:32:17 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 24, 2025, 03:15:49 PM

the same goes to casinos. There are some kyc-free casinos around, but they are all small ones.

The bigger the casino, the faster it will create awareness for the government to look into for regulations. If not, the casino will be shutdown. Nobody wants his business to be shutdown or go against the government laws, so they have no option than to dance the way the government asks them to.

I don't see any problem is using a trusted and reputable KYC casinos, because apart from crypto, everything about our lives centralized. Bitcoin changed that.

That’s basically the reality of it. Small platforms can fly under the radar for a while, but once a casino grows, regulation is inevitable. KYC isn’t about choice anymore, it’s the price of scaling legally. The key point isn’t avoiding KYC, but choosing platforms that handle user data responsibly and transparently.

Yes, you’re right. KYC simply cannot be avoided, and as you said, that isn’t even the goal. In the case of large winnings, KYC will have to be completed anyway. If I’m already deciding to play on a platform and be a regular player, and that platform requires KYC while also being verified and well rated, i would complete the KYC process right at the beginning ...

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 09:06:23 PM

They used to charge about 3% fee in every swap (no deal for me in most situations)

the only thing that stops me from using cce.cash is the high fees. 3% is by no means a small fee, and if you swap regularly, it add up quickly and eats into your stash.

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 09:06:23 PM

I just made a simulation now, and it was less than 2% fee (about 1.9% fee)

it would have been great if that was for all coins, but it looks like the fee depends on the pairs you are swapping.
XMR to USDT fee for example, is still around 3% as you can see:

it would be nice if they were a bit more transparent about the fees.

Não precisa fazer curso pra entender de Bitcoin (não falo por outras criptomoedas, como Yieldfarm, trading, etc), mas comece pelo básico, já assistiu os vídeos do Dâniel Fraga? Por mais antigos que eles estejam, assista alguns vídeos, claro que muita coisa mudou, mas a essência permanece a mesma, como não usar a carteira blockchain.info (.com), por mais que naquela época era bastante conhecida, hoje ela é considerava insegura (na minha visão, web wallets por definição, nunca serão seguras).

Depois, o algoritmo do youtube vai fazer o resto, eu gosto de assistir o criptomaniacos (ele foca mais na parte filosófica, análises on-chain, gráficas e indicadores de tendências), joão trein, doguera bitcoin.

Canais gringos: BTCSessions, crypto guide, The CryptoDad... habilitando as legendas você consegue entender, ainda mais agora que o YT está dublando artificialmente os idiomas (não são todos).

Livros: A internet do dinheiro, esse livro é maravilhoso, ele foca mais na parte filosófica e exemplos práticos, não contém muita prática ou conteúdos mais técnicos (eu li só o volume 1, hoje tem o volume 2). Para focar na parte técnica, tem o livro do Mastering Bitcoin produzido pelo mesmo autor: andreas antonoupolus que o bitmover recomendou, eu li boa parte dele na primeira edição, não li os outros ainda.

Recomendo o site: https://learnmeabitcoin.com/
Ele é o mais técnico que eu conheço, bem didático.

O resto você vai descobrindo sozinha, pois o aprendizado no Bitcoin é individual, basta não cair em golpes, pirâmides, phishings, promessas de ganhos fáceis e sem esforço, coisas óbvias... que você ficará bem.

Outra dica, frequente a aba de discussões técnicas global do bitcointalk, você vai aprender muita coisa lendo por lá.

Você tem potencial!

Quote from: FeeBuddy on December 24, 2025, 11:01:10 PM

fastestFee: 2.5 sat/vB
halfHourFee: 1.3 sat/vB
hourFee: 0.6 sat/vB
economyFee: 0.2 sat/vB
minimumFee: 0.1 sat/vB

Quote from: FeeBuddy on Today at 07:00:32 AM

fastestFee: 1.5 sat/vB
halfHourFee: 1.3 sat/vB
hourFee: 1 sat/vB
economyFee: 0.2 sat/vB
minimumFee: 0.1 sat/vB

@bitmover did you understand why those two images weren't generated?

Here are the results! Block #929441

https://bitcoindata.science/giveaway-manager/?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

Winner! 58 Pmalek, Congratulations and Merry Christmas! 🎄🎁

Howard will take it from here 🤍

Quote from: bitmover on December 24, 2025, 06:33:54 PM

These few athletes make so much money that in the end I believe they are all about records and titles, not money anymore. Some of them even have private jets

What you said is very correct. I was watching SportyTV last year and a player was saying, he doesn't want to be like Lionel Messi but he wants to be like himself. That means, the money Lionel Messi has is not his problem but the title. He wants to make name for himself as Lionel Messi did.

But I will like to ask this question. I don't know if it is only in the African Nations this things happens. Why is it that a footballer who was making money and name died in poverty? I have seen some of them like that in Africa Nations, Specifically my country.

Quote from: bitmover on December 24, 2025, 03:22:32 PM

I see you have in your roadmap support for USDT and USDC. What about DAI?

+1 for DAI request.
USDT did not comply with the MiCA regulation (although there are still no special restrictions). USDC is also quite centralized. DAI is the closest stablecoin to the free market, and most importantly, it is not subject to freezing coins by the creator.

Slot #: 25
BTC Address: bc1quazl54eae6u42dxgatq8n4xsjpc9ypqs5zngsj,

Helping with the recap so the team can easily input it into the OP.

Code:

DYING_S0UL = Slot #: 10
Pmalek = Slot #: 17
inspace = Slot #: 05
examplens = Slot #: 34, 35
TryNinja = Slot #: 4
Cityhunter34 = Slot #: 02
ovcijisir = Slot #: 27, 37
klarki = Slot #: 33
tvplus006 = Slot #: 23
Tonimez = Slot #: 39
bitmover = Slot #: 06, 07
Peanutswar = Slot# 14
mikel_012 = Slot #: 1
Chilwell = Slot #: 40
Mr. Magkaisa = Slot #: 40
tiCeR = Slot #: 15
UserU = Slot #: 29
POPOLUV = Slot #: 50
Hypnotizer = Slot #: 48
katanic97 = Slot # : 26
ZeroVinsonN = Slot #: 42
xandry = Slot #: 03
rbynxx = Slot # 45
ejikeme24 = Slot # 43, 44
Derekfunds = Slot#: 12
LOCKACO = Slot #: 49
Cryptmuster = Slot #: 38
CONVOAI = Slot #: 09 , 16
LogitechMouse = Slot #:20
DarkState = Slot #: 41
dkbit98 = Slot #: 36, 46
Zwei = Slot #: 22
Bigjoe33 = Slot #: 34
Husna QA = Slot #: 08, 11
Egii Nna = Slot #: 19
taufik123 = Slot#: 04, 18
AakZaki = Slot#: 25

The slot numbers that are not yet filled from 1–50 are:

13, 21, 24, 28, 30, 31, 32, 47

Season’s greetings everyone
In appreciation to my esteemed and valued customers, I am pleased to announce a special raffle draw contest exclusively for users who have patronized the Floxynice Quick Naira Loan Service.

This raffle is my own small way of saying thank you to those who trusted me, repaid responsibly, and helped grow this service within our Nigerian Bitcointalk community.

Important information

Total Giveaway Amount: ₦60,000 (₦20,000 each). There will be 3 lucky numbers to be won.
The winners will be selected through a random raffle draw with bitmover tool.
All customers who have patronized the Floxynice Quick Naira Loan Service and their names are on my list in the update are eligible to participate.
However, to appreciate loyalty and consistency, entries will be categorized as follows:
Premium Customers (10+ Loans Taken) are entitled to pick THREE (3) numbers from 1–100, while regular Customers (Below 10 Loans) are entitled to pick only ONE (1) number from 1–100
Reply in this thread with your username and your chosen number(s).
Please check your name below to know which category you belong to:
This raffle is strictly for verified customers of my loan service
Any attempt to manipulate or impersonate will lead to disqualification
Floxynice reserves the right to make final decisions where necessary
We are open for sponsorship of any kind.

Thank you all for your trust, loyalty, and support throughout the year.
This community made the Floxynice Quick Naira Loan Service possible, and I truly appreciate every single patron.

Merry Christmas
Happy New Year in advance
Congratulations to the future winners!

Quote from: Kaliandra on December 19, 2025, 10:04:32 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 05, 2025, 12:06:56 AM

I will repeat that it seems to me that if a guy has more than a whole cycle accumulating bitcoin, then he might switch his BTC accumulation strategy, yet even see guys who are ONLY in bitcoin for less than a whole cycle who are pausing in their bitcoin accumulation. Perhaps expecting lower prices that may or may not happen.. which may be a BIGGER mistake for a newer person to be waiting for lower prices that might not happen.

It seems that many people are satisfied with the BTC they already have, and most of them always wait for the price of BTC to drop significantly before buying. However, even though the current price of BTC is relatively high, it will not drop further or reach its lowest point in the past because the number of people adopting BTC is certainly increasing. so ultimately, it will be difficult for the price of BTC to fall very low. There will definitely be a decline, but only a slight one, and of course that is normal because the price of BTC will rise even higher later.

Yes, it is true that if are new to investing in BTC, it would be a big mistake to wait for BTC to fall to a low price, for example below $20k, before buying it. Sometimes I also find it strange that there are still people who stop buying BTC because they feel they have enough, when in fact, if we are still new to buying BTC, it would be better not to feel satisfied because the current price of BTC can be considered cheap compared to the price of BTC in the future.

My ways of assessing this has changed over the years, and frequently I find it difficult to figure out some kinds of a standard that might be reasonable.

Another thing is that even if we look at the whole last 3-ish years, the BTC price has mostly been going up the whole time, so it becomes difficult to figure out circumstances that any guys might have come to the conclusion that they bought enough or more than enough when they are largely buying their coins on the way up, unless they were able to front load their investment in 2022 or 2023, then it might make sense if they largely were able to buy most if not all of their bitcoin at an average that is mostly less than $30k and perhaps they were able to accumulate close to or more than a whole years of their income (expenses) at those sub $30-k prices.

Another possibility could be a guy that started in 2020 or even 2021, yet still bought mostly on the way down and also potentially was able to continue to buy in 2022, so he did not run out of money, yet he still might have had retained an average price per coin that might be in the $30k to $40k range.. and maybe even closer to $40k.. .... so some of those kinds of circumstances I could imagine a guy concluding that he had accumulated enough or more than enough, even if he had not quite reached fuck you status and/or overaccumulation status.. but if he had accumulated something like a year or two of his expenses, he might be tentatively concluding that he has enough and he will just let time play out to bring himself potentially to a place that he might be able to start to time based sustainable withdraw down the road, and maybe he could have also entered some kind of price based sustainable withdrawal based on his assessment of his own circumstances.

Maybe an example would be helpful? Let me go with a guy who gotten started in bitcoin in late 2020, and let's say that when he got started in bitcoin he is was his mid 40s, and he had been earning around $70k per year, so over the prior 20 years he had invested more than $120k into various non bitcoin investments and those investments were worth around $300k (his then investment portfolio). He also had strong cashflow management systems and his back up funds and other random investments that also might be considered fairly liquid were around 7 months of his expenses (maybe they added up to $30k-ish).

And so when this guy started in bitcoin in about October 2020 BTC prices were around $12k, and he decided that he was going to take around 50% from his other investments so he was able to get $150k to be able to use to buy bitcoin, and so he was able to buy right around 12 BTC with his initial investment amount, and so then thereafter from October 2020, he set up a weekly buy amounts that tended to vary between $100 per week and $500 per week depending on how he was feeling (he varied his buy amounts).. so maybe in the next 3-ish years, he ended up investing an additional $100k and perhaps he accumulated about 4 bitcoin and he had purchases that were higher when BTC prices were below $30k and lower when BTC prices were above $30k.. and so in the end at around the end of 2023, he had invested a total of about $250k (which was more than 3 x his current income) and he had accumulated 16 BTC... so by the end of 2023, he was starting to come to the conclusion that he had enough bitcoin and/or more than enough bitcoin.

I am just trying to describe some circumstances in which a guy might have had concluded that he had accumulated enough bitcoin or more than enough bitcoin even though by the end of 2023, he had only been in bitcoin slightly more than 3 years. Maybe the guy had a goal of being able to withdraw from his holdings at $100k per year, even though in late 2023, he might have had concluded that 16 BTC would only support around a $40k per year income, yet he still tentatively concluded that he had enough bitcoin to wait out a few years in the event that later he might want to start to withdraw at a rate of around $100k per year with the 16 BTC that he had accumulated. His cost per BTC were right just under $16k per coin (mostly due to his initial starting out lump sum) which might be a bit unrealistic and even lucky for a guy to have had been able to accumulate so much.

So I am not suggesting it to be impossible to come to an assessment of overaccumulation status in less than 4 years, and a guy might not necessarily be ready to employ some sustainable withdrawal even though he might have had assessed that after a few years of investing into bitcoin in a fairly aggressive way, that he had largely invested enough into bitcoin based on his own financial and psychological circumstances and how much he was willing to continue to put into bitcoin.

Of course there could be other variations of this scenario, and even if the guy came to an assessment in late 2023, that he had enough bitcoin, he might have decided to continue to buy bitcoin, yet to just buy it at a lower rate, such as $100 per week.. Or maybe he would have had invested into other things during 2024 and 2025? Guys are going to vary in regards to how they deal with matters... even though I am proclaiming that with the goals that my hypothetical guy has, he would not necessarily need to continue to accumulate bitcoin once he had reached his accumulation of 16 BTC and his having had invested $250k into bitcoin, since he would still be able to employ price based sustainable withdrawal even if he might not feel that his holdings are in a place to start time-based sustainable withdrawal.

Quote from: bitmover on December 16, 2025, 12:04:15 AM

At maximum risk I get at most x2 , after dozens of tries...

I stopped playing because it is so hard and not cost effective... just lost money lol

Same thing with me, if I continued playing Plinko Games on higher levels than I would lose all my coins Grin

Now I switched back to my standard games, but I dont so much luck like I had back in the old days.
I dont remember last time I had a big win.

Quote from: alegotardo on Today at 12:53:07 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 23, 2025, 07:18:45 PM

Eu peguei quase mil no airdrop.

Mas de acordo com o site, as minhas ficaram presas por ainda mais 71dias... não posso fazer o claim agora. Acho que muita gente deve estar nessa situacao.

Na real, acho que fui o único que não está acompanhando mais isso, apesar do OP que parecia ser interessante, eu logo desanimei quando parei também para refletir mais nos requisitos do airdrop e ver como isso aí tomou proporções grandes quanto ao conhecimento das pessoas, ou seja... muita gente com direito ao airdrop, muuuitos vão vender, a maioria terá de esperar alguns meses para conseguir fazer isso e consequentemente o preço vai cair ainda mais.
Cheguei à conclusão de que não vale à pena continuar gastando empenho nisso.

Mas, se alguém aqui conseguir um critério de airdrop mais significativo e resgatar antes ou conseguir uma quantia maior de moedas que seja relevante, não deixa de avisar e pagar o churrasco.

É isso um pouco que eu pensei.

Com base naquele valor atual, não conseguir sacar pelo menos uns 1000 tokens, pouco provável seja mais vantajoso daqui a uns 2 ou 3 meses.

Quote from: Ruttoshi on Today at 05:32:17 PM

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 03:15:49 PM

the same goes to casinos. There are some kyc-free casinos around, but they are all small ones.

The bigger the casino, the faster it will create awareness for the government to look into for regulations. If not, the casino will be shutdown. Nobody wants his business to be shutdown or go against the government laws, so they have no option than to dance the way the government asks them to.

I don't see any problem is using a trusted and reputable KYC casinos, because apart from crypto, everything about our lives centralized. Bitcoin changed that.

That’s basically the reality of it. Small platforms can fly under the radar for a while, but once a casino grows, regulation is inevitable. KYC isn’t about choice anymore, it’s the price of scaling legally. The key point isn’t avoiding KYC, but choosing platforms that handle user data responsibly and transparently.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 03:15:49 PM

the same goes to casinos. There are some kyc-free casinos around, but they are all small ones.

The bigger the casino, the faster it will create awareness for the government to look into for regulations. If not, the casino will be shutdown. Nobody wants his business to be shutdown or go against the government laws, so they have no option than to dance the way the government asks them to.

I don't see any problem is using a trusted and reputable KYC casinos, because apart from crypto, everything about our lives centralized. Bitcoin changed that.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:43:46 PM

It would be interesting to see the data of which (or at least which boards) reduced merit sources.
I believe there is so much merit farming/abuse in some local boards for so long time... I think some of those should be reviewed....

The thing is even if being a merit source is a voluntary thing it's one of the most important roles on the forum. Because of their allocation they actually have the power to moderate merit to an extent. If merit sources don't merit quality posts overtime they will drop because it would seem like they are not acknowledged.

Regardless merit distribution is still everyone's responsibility. Many users hoard a ton of smerits even if they earn alot all these factors have a role to play in merit distribution.

Quote from: LoyceV on December 23, 2025, 01:22:05 PM

Quote from: snowpega on December 23, 2025, 01:08:34 PM

One name I still remember strongly was "Ratimove". And as far as I remember, he used to add useful topics to his thread (I think his thread name was 'Encyclopaedia CMIIW'!) so that newbies could get useful information in a quick way, but sadly we lost that gem, and he passed away.

Ratimov had his nickname changed to Symmetrick, went kinda nuts, started name calling, deleted every post he could, backed out of a sponsorship, and eventually was banned. He single-handedly destroyed his reputation and left.

To be honest, I have this idea that the user changed his name, but I did not have that idea like he used to post plagiarised posts. So that was a big foolish step of him. I mean, I am not much surprised by the way he destroyed his account, and near me, an account does not value more than the person behind it, so what is more surprising is that person destroyed his name and his reputation.

Quote from: dkbit98 on December 23, 2025, 03:17:20 PM

Sure, we are losing good members all the time, simply because people are getting older or they have other priorities.

Yeah, that's true, and I agree with you. We have one older member in our Pakistan local community, and he has not been posting for too long, and some of our community members reached out to him through Telegram many months ago. Then they tell us that he is fine and alive, but what thoughts disturb most of the time is that those good users whom we used to interact with most of the time in a good way are not posting anymore. As I told you, he is an old man, so your words perfectly fit here. We always keep them remember in our good memories.

Quote from: apogio on December 23, 2025, 04:39:43 PM

Quote from: snowpega on December 23, 2025, 01:08:34 PM

We have lost some other good users here as well, like lightworrior and o_e_l_e_o, they both were active users and a great asset for the bitcointalk community.

Unfortunately, the reality is much worse. These users didn't simply quit bitcointalk, but, as far as we know, they are probably looking at us from above, hopefully smiling with us, seeing us arguing about insignificant stuff.

But, don't worry! We're still around and we'll continue being around, as long as this forum keeps giving us fun moments

Literally, I love the way you say it. That represents that we still remember them in our good memories. What makes them stay in our memory is that we had a great time with these users who left us and will not come back. What can we do for them? We can just pray for them for the ease of their next life.

And for the last line of what you said, I agree with you, mate; it's now our duty to keep interacting with each other so that we all can spend a good time here with each other and lead the forum further.

Quote from: bitmover on December 23, 2025, 06:35:03 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on December 23, 2025, 01:22:05 PM

Quote from: snowpega on December 23, 2025, 01:08:34 PM

One name I still remember strongly was "Ratimove". And as far as I remember, he used to add useful topics to his thread (I think his thread name was 'Encyclopaedia CMIIW'!) so that newbies could get useful information in a quick way, but sadly we lost that gem, and he passed away.

Ratimov had his nickname changed to Symmetrick, went kinda nuts, started name calling, deleted every post he could, backed out of a sponsorship, and eventually was banned. He single-handedly destroyed his reputation and left.

He made some good contributions to the forum... but i dont undertand how moderators allowed him to freely plagiarize so many posts for so long without any consequence.... clearly farming merits and reputation with other people's work..

Probably most users didnt even notice that most of his good posts were plagiarism.

Maybe he is still among us with another account.

And maybe I am one of those users who still don't have that idea, sadly. I honestly did not know it, but a lot of things got opened to me after this thread. You guys know much more about him than I do. And if that is so, there is no doubt that he may be reading our discussion using his alt-accounts.

Quote from: fillippone on December 23, 2025, 11:52:27 PM

Big users come and go.
For sure o_e_l_e_o was of a unique breed, but he wasn’t alone on the history of this forum.
I won’t say today users are less valid than those at the beginning of this forum (Satoshi excluded): every epoch has his distinct tone, and new users are growing here. One day they will be remembered as great as well.

Yeah, that's the big reality, and no one can deny that.

And I agree with you; every person is way different than others, like everyone has their own personality and the way they talk to others (tone). And these kinds of things make everyone a unique identity, and if it is good, then no doubt we always keep them remembered once they leave us forever.

And in the same way, I would like to relate my saying with your last words that if we end up doing things well, then there is no doubt that everyone will keep us remembered in their memories, and we will then live in their memories. A man's character matters a lot.

Quote from: Mia Chloe on Today at 05:22:04 AM

Well the fact is just like others have said, people come and go and the forum moves on not basically forgetting them but learning to continue without them. Sadly when light warrior passed I wasn't very familiar but both 1miau and o_e_l_e_o's disappearance was way unexpected and very sad.

Regardless I'm glad they were all of positive effect on the forum and it was good to interact with them and learn from them. One thing I do understand is boards won't go missing a particular personality as there's always someone pretty close for a substitution.

Mate, what everyone says is a fact that no one can deny: living on planet earth. Because that is true, and the cycle of life does not stop whether one is dead or still alive. Many say move on. I really know this is the best solution, but one more thing: we cannot deny that they still live in our thoughts and memories, those whom we love the most. Just for example, we say we moved on, but on any random day or any random Wednesday or any random cultural day, those random days you have spent quality time with will make you full of tears sometimes. But we have to make ourselves strong by saying that we have moved on.

All of these users you mentioned in your post were really a great asset for the BitcoinTalk community, and no one is going to forget their contribution to the forum, and they will stay alive in our memory. And if I talk about 1miau, then I would say he was a great user with whom I had a great work experience.

Quote from: Mpamaegbu on Today at 09:14:05 AM

Quote from: snowpega on December 23, 2025, 01:08:34 PM

I opened Bitcointalk some days ago, and then I opened my PM, and then one message caught my attention where I saw that 1miau is also no more. That makes me feel really sad.

The user – 1miau isn't dead. They only decided to rest that account. It wasn't even on self destruct like what Lauda did and will never have access to it. For 1miau, I'm sure those who maintained that the user is dead read from this thread. They should read the last post there where the user had to lock the thread. Dead men don't walk.

I am still confused. Does that mean this account was managed by someone else? Well, what I understand is that someone else wrote those words on his behalf and the user 1miau is dead. Well, some users are saying that his kitty died; that's why he left the forum. I don't know the exact reason, but what's sad is that 1miau has left the forum and will never come back, as he was a great asset for the bitcointalk community. And we all remember him in our memory.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 12:43:46 PM

Does that mean that the introduction of merit reduced spam? Or that fewer people are coming to bitcointalk?

Both, I think.

Quote from: bitmover on December 23, 2025, 07:18:45 PM

Eu peguei quase mil no airdrop.

Mas de acordo com o site, as minhas ficaram presas por ainda mais 71dias... não posso fazer o claim agora. Acho que muita gente deve estar nessa situacao.

Na real, acho que fui o único que não está acompanhando mais isso, apesar do OP que parecia ser interessante, eu logo desanimei quando parei também para refletir mais nos requisitos do airdrop e ver como isso aí tomou proporções grandes quanto ao conhecimento das pessoas, ou seja... muita gente com direito ao airdrop, muuuitos vão vender, a maioria terá de esperar alguns meses para conseguir fazer isso e consequentemente o preço vai cair ainda mais.
Cheguei à conclusão de que não vale à pena continuar gastando empenho nisso.

Mas, se alguém aqui conseguir um critério de airdrop mais significativo e resgatar antes ou conseguir uma quantia maior de moedas que seja relevante, não deixa de avisar e pagar o churrasco.

🚀 Another raffle is live! Secure your entry now and take part in the draw. Don’t wait too long — slots are limited.

🌐 Bridgoro.com 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 $30 in BTC!

➥ Pick any available slot to join.
➥ Already posted in our ANN thread? You can claim 2 slots.
➥ After selecting a block, we will use the Bitmover tool to determine the winner.

Follow us and stay updated!

Quote from: Semi-decentralized P2P Exchange Platform [ANN Bitcointalk] & [ANN Altcointalk] & [Telegram] Community Channel

Bridgoro.com project is being developed by a team of blockchain enthusiasts. Our mission is simple: create a reliable, censorship-resistant exchange that preserves the core values of crypto - privacy, autonomy, and trust through technology. Supported currencies: .BTC, ETH, SOL, TRX, and XMR..

Rules/Prizes:

➥ Pick a SLOT! 🎯
➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ You can choose 2 SLOTS if you posted comments in the ANN topic before the raffle announcement.
➥ After selecting a block, we will use the Bitmover tool to determine the winner.

01 -
02 -
03 -
04 -
05 -
06 -
07 -
08 -
09 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14 -
15 -
16 -
17 -
18 -
19 -
20 -
21 -
22 -
23 -
24 -
25 -
26 -
27 -
28 -
29 -
30 -
31 -
32 -
33 -
34 -
35 -
36 -
37 -
38 -
39 -
40 -
41 -
42 -
43 -
44 -
45 -
46 -
47 -
48 -
49 -
50 -

Application:

Code:

Slot #:
BTC Address:

Quote from: Bridgoro.com

We reserve the right to ignore any application without explanation. Applications without a BTC address will not be accepted..

Раффл от CCE.Cash: ♻️ CCE.Cash 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 $30 in BTC!

Правила/Призы

Quote

➥ выберите свободный слот* и отправьте свой выбор в эту тему
➥ победитель получить 30$ в BTC

*Вы можете выбрать 2 слота, если оставляли комментарии в ANN CCE.Cash до анонса раффла (за последние 2 недели)
Для определения победителя будет использовать инструмент http://bitcoindata.science/giveaway-manager/

Quote from: ➥ Instant / Automatic & No Registration [Official Website] & [Fast Tutorial] & [ANN Thread] & [Altcointalk] 🔊

CCE.Cash is a Fast Automatic Exchange accepting .Bitcoin, ETH, SOL, XMR, TRX, USDT., etc. Users can quickly and anonymously complete currency exchange without registering. Its core features are: automation, simplicity, and security. A simple 2-step guide will help you quickly get familiar with the functionality.

Rules/Prizes:

➥ Pick a SLOT! 🎯
➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ You can choose 2 SLOTS if you posted comments in the ANN topic before the raffle announcement.
➥ After selecting a block, we will use the Bitmover tool to determine the winner.

01 -
02 -
03 -
04 -
05 -
06 -
07 -
08 -
09 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14 -
15 -
16 -
17 -
18 -
19 -
20 -
21 -
22 -
23 -
24 -
25 -
26 -
27 -
28 -
29 -
30 -
31 -
32 -
33 -
34 -
35 -
36 -
37 -
38 -
39 -
40 -
41 -
42 -
43 -
44 -
45 -
46 -
47 -
48 -
49 -
50 -
51 -
52 -
53 -
54 -
55 -
56 -
57 -
58 -
59 -
60 -

Application:

Code:

Slot #:
BTC Address:

Quote from: CCE.Cash

We reserve the right to ignore any application without explanation. No random slots.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 04:11:14 PM

Eu acho que é obrigação do usuario ler o manual de instruções do equipamento.

Isso fez lembrar quando comprei carro.
Comentei com o vendedor que ia dar uma vista de olhos no manual do carro. Ele virá e disse para não fazer isso que não era preciso.

Eu nem respondi só ri... Como assim não é preciso? É um manual feito pelo fabricante por algum motivo. Posso não ler aquilo ao detalhe, mas pelo menos ter uma ideia onde estão as diversas informações, para quando for preciso ser mais fácil. E claro que foi preciso.

As pessoas deixaram de dar valor aos manuais, mas continuam a ser úteis para quem os segue.

Quote from: promise444c5 on December 19, 2025, 10:41:35 AM

The fact that Ledger Recover exists at all is alarming. It requires firmware that can possibly access & export the seed, and that firmware is closed source… So if there’s no way to independently verify , then isn’t it possible that ledger can access seed even if the user has not opted in fr Ledger Recover?

Ledger Recover service is distributed, not centralized. The seeds are encrypted and distributed to Ledger, Coincover, and EscrowTech. Coincover, and EscrowTech trust Ledger by default, and when Ledger asks them to sign a message, they will do. If Ledger servers are hacked, you will be safe, but you still need to trust Ledger.

Quote from: bitmover on December 19, 2025, 12:19:01 PM

Leger nano S and Nano X work without this feature. I have both and they dont have such feature. X supports it but you must enable it.

I bought them years before such feature existed...

At some point firmware updates may be necessary

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 04:11:14 PM

Como o valor é relativamente pequeno, cerca de 10k usd, acho que a trezor pode ate bancar se der muita repercussão.

Tem perdas de outras pessoas também.. passa os US$ 100.000 no total.. mesmo assim também acho que seria uma quantia pequena para eles..

O problema é que isso abre precedente para outros casos.. o erro final foi do usuário.. imagina se invadem o Bitcoin Data Science, você vai pagar alguém que digitou a seed ali? Roll Eyes

A primeira coisa que lembrei ao ver esse caso foi quando tentei baixar o software deles e veio esse aviso do Windows:

Quote from: sabotag3x on August 01, 2025, 03:19:41 AM

Muito complicado uma empresa de "segurança" não se preocupar com esses detalhes e agora tomar um ataque em seu site..

Quote from: Forsyth Jones on Today at 04:31:05 PM

Exato, o pior erro que um iniciante que caiu de paraquedas no Bitcoin e no mundo cripto em geral, é ir de cara comprar uma hardware wallet, as chances de perder dinheiro são muito grandes.

Pois se um usuário não sabe a importância de uma seed phrase, ele vai guardar isso num bloco de notas do Windows (kkk) ou simplesmente não anotar/jogar fora, vai só anotar no momento da geração da wallet, pois a maioria obriga o usuário a confirmar se realmente anotou ou não... mesmo com todos essas medidas de seguranças, os usuários ou perdem os fundos ou perdem os fundos para bandidos via phishing.

Isso é verdade.. tem gente que não entende que dá pra importar a seed em outra carteira.. pensam que é uma "senha" pra essa carteira ai..

Mas o cara ali parecia estar no mercado há uns 4 anos pelas conversas que li no Reclame Aqui entre ele e a KriptoBR.. não era novato não.

Queria saber qual era a isca que tinha no site para terem caído no golpe.. difícil ver casos assim.

Quote from: bitmover on Today at 04:11:14 PM

Quote from: sabotag3x on December 19, 2025, 08:13:02 PM

-

Exato, o pior erro que um iniciante que caiu de paraquedas no Bitcoin e no mundo cripto em geral, é ir de cara comprar uma hardware wallet, as chances de perder dinheiro são muito grandes.

Pois se um usuário não sabe a importância de uma seed phrase, ele vai guardar isso num bloco de notas do Windows (kkk) ou simplesmente não anotar/jogar fora, vai só anotar no momento da geração da wallet, pois a maioria obriga o usuário a confirmar se realmente anotou ou não... mesmo com todos essas medidas de seguranças, os usuários ou perdem os fundos ou perdem os fundos para bandidos via phishing.

Ainda tem o malware do clipboard que adultera o endereço, todo cuidado é pouco até na hora de movimentar os fundos na hardware wallet, mas não, a maioria se sente um super-homem ao usar uma.

Enquanto as pessoas não entender que a seed phrase é mais importante a hardware wallet, ele não está preparado pra ter uma hardware wallet, o aparelho pode até quebrar, dependendo da sua quantia, basta comprar outro ou ter um backup em casa.

O ideal pra um novato seria ele baixar uma wallet no desktop ou celular e ir experimentando, enviando um pouquinho, transferir pra outros serviços, utilizar a wallet, entender da importância das chaves e aí depois partir pra uma hardware wallet.

Quote from: joker_josue on December 22, 2025, 06:41:43 PM

Quote from: bitmover on December 22, 2025, 11:50:20 AM

Foi muito dificil aprovar a nossa lista, e nos demos tipo um necrobump la no github

Acho que os devs nao receberam muito bem, mas como tinha muita gente envolvida eles resolveram aprovar. Dai surgiram várias outras iniciativas após a nossa , e eles nao aprovaram mais

Também seria um pouco parvo não aprovar o 6 idioma mais falado do mundo.
Ainda por cima, se aceitaram idiomas muito menos falados, como o japonês.

Acho que todas as wallets, mesmo suportando esse BIP, continuam a só apresentar as palavras em inglês por padrão.
De facto, não era difícil introduzir um drop list para a pessoa escolher as palavras.

Aliás, se pensarmos bem, é mais seguro usar palavras em PT do que em ENG, porque o padrão é inglês e usar o português é fora do padrão.

Pensei a mesma coisa, principalmente o português por conta da 'ç' que não vai ser considerada em ataques por exemplo. Então, dá até para as Wallets 'venderem' como sendo mais segura, pois nunca saberão qual as palavras/idioma que foram utilizadas.

Ho Ho Ho !
As promised, here is the latest update before the final results.
Well... It looks like I have lost my place on the podium. With Christmas coming up, I'm likely to end up with the chocolate medal.
The top three are within 50$ of each other. Nothing is decided yet.
See you on January 1, 2026.

Pos	Users	22/12/2025
1	internetional	1 293,89
2	LoyceV	1 273,03
3	paid2	1 247,44
4	Halab	1 164,87
5	GazetaBitcoin	1 040,87
6	sompitonov	935,82
	Bitcoin	884,51
7	DireWolfM14	864,38
8	memehunter	841,83
9	examplens	787,76
10	ajiz138	656,70
11	icopress	605,41
12	n0nce	541,85
13	B1g4udge	493,61
	Average	487,21
14	FinneysTrueVision	485,11
15	shahzadafzal	464,56
16	rat03gopoh	464,03
17	Smartprofit	437,39
18	DYING_S0UL	435,21
19	Rikafip	398,28
20	GrosWesh	394,54
21	Despairo	346,13
22	Saint-loup	339,15
23	LogitechMouse	336,25
24	jokers10	322,65
25	SamReomo	319,95
	Random_but_balanced	297,25
26	Taskford	295,40
27	xandry	285,12
28	tokeweed	281,72
29	cryptofrka	260,26
30	Woodie	221,07
31	klarki	211,34
32	worldofcoins	201,37
33	Buchi-88	199,26
34	bitmover	184,92
35	famososMuertos	181,90
36	libert19	173,76
37	arallmuus	169,72
38	Koal-84	137,54
39	xLays	102,88
40	slackovic	91,29

Line chart race : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/
LCR without Woodie : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/24269401/

Quote from: bitmover on December 20, 2025, 01:05:20 AM

This situation hardly would happen to btc.

All those ethereum copy cats allow you to have just one address per wallet.

Bitcoin wallets generate one new address per transaction, so you end up with lots of addresses and different balances in each.
But yeah, people must be aware of what they are exposing when transferring money

Technically it is possible to have stealth addresses on EVM chains. From my understanding, they are similar to silent payments on Bitcoin. There aren’t many wallets supporting this, which I suppose is because web3 applications are designed to work with a single address at a time, so it would be a bad experience for users trying to do anything besides holding.