That’s correct. To confirm, there are no mandatory KYC requirements for crypto deposits or withdrawals, regardless of the amount.

The only exception is if our system flags fraudulent activity (such as multi-accounting, bonus abuse, or suspicious patterns). In those specific cases, we reserve the right to request verification to protect the platform.

We also appreciate the suggestion regarding the Terms of Service—we are currently working on updating the wording to make this distinction between fiat and crypto users much clearer for everyone.

----------------------


We are already working on this , thanks for suggestions



------------------------



Thank you for your valuable feedback. we know that many players have a strong preference for "originals" or mini-games like Dice, Plinko, and Crash due to their fast pace and strategic play.

We have redirected this concern to the relevant team for immediate review. Our goal is to ensure that players who genuinely enjoy these games aren't unfairly restricted by policies designed to stop bad actors.

We are actively working to improve this gap by:

Expanding our library with more diverse game options.

Reviewing our wagering policies to better accommodate different playstyles.

We will keep the community updated as we make these adjustments. We appreciate your patience as we work to find the right balance!

The explanation clears something about their terms on KYC but if the ToS is already outdated, they will need to update it as soon as possible, especially after it was found by community and they were already aware about that too.

ToS needs to be written in very details, and precisely reflects what the company offers to users. From the answer, they provide no KYC service for cryptocurrency users, but if it is fiat currency users from Visa/ Mastercard, KYC will be requested, mandatory so these two opposite terms must be added to their ToS. It's better to have a transparent and detailed ToS than lacking of some details which can confuse users and can be a possible reputation damage factor for their company too.

Hello,

Thank you for your interest.

The issue we are currently facing is related to Trustpilot’s strict policies regarding how businesses invite users to leave reviews. Trustpilot requires that all review invitations are sent directly through their platform to ensure compliance with their guidelines.

We had been in discussions with them and had already started the integration process. However, during this period, we independently sent an email to our users inviting them to rate their experience with the casino. Unfortunately, this approach did not align with their policies, and as a result, a warning notice was placed on our profile.

Since then, we have been working to address the situation and ensure full compliance with their requirements moving forward.

Please let us know if you need any additional details.


--------------------------



We are a Hybrid brand , as you can see there are fiat payment options too, that's why there is a verification requirement, but i can assure you it's fully no KYC on crypto as mentioned. This rule about verification is only for visa/Mastercard users .


-------------------------


We’re here and actively working on everything. There’s a lot more coming in terms of campaigns and updates, and we’ll keep things moving on our side.

All threads will be answered and handled accordingly.

-------------------------



We are here from now on and everything will be alright , just got everything up and now we will work with you guys to make CasinOK better place for users


-----------------------------------

We understand your concern. We’ve only recently set everything up on the forum, so it took us a bit of time to get fully organized here.

That said, we’re now actively monitoring and from this point on all questions and threads will be answered.


----------------------------------




We understand your point, and just to clarify — this rule is not there to limit regular players, but to prevent fraudulent activity.

We’ve seen cases where certain games (like dice or similar low-risk/high-frequency games) are used to bypass requirements or gain unfair advantage. Because of that, some restrictions are applied specifically to protect the system and keep things fair for everyone.

That said, we’re always reviewing these rules and trying to keep the balance between security and a good player experience.

 RULES

---

• Pick a SLOT you like.  Last date to make your pick: Saturday 23:59 UTC 
• You can pick a 2ND ADDITIONAL SLOT if you contributed with a constructive comments in the Vega Bet ANN topic WITHIN 5 DAYS BEFORE THIS RAFFLE ANNOUNCEMENT.
  (In this case make sure you add comment link with your entry)
• You can pick a 3RD ADDITIONAL SLOT if you have a Vega Bet account which had at least $100 successful deposit. Don't have an account yet? Click here and register.
  
  • Deposit must not be more than 3 days old from the date you entered in this raffle
  • Taking three slots WITHOUT a Vega Bet minimum deposit will disqualify your winning
• We will find the winners using Bitmover's giveaway manager on Sunday from a future Bitcoin Block Height
• Any questions? Ask on my Telegram group
• My decisions are final, you must follow the Vega Bet Terms
• You will receive reward in your Vega Bet BTC account

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   -
3   -
4   -
5   -
6   -
7   -
8   -
9   -
10   -
11   -
12   -
13   -
14   -
15   -
16   -
17   -
18   -
19   -
20   -
21   -
22   -
23   -
24   -
25   -
26   -
27   -
28   -
29   -
30   -
31   -
32   -
33   -
34   -
35   -
36   -
37   -
38   -
39   -
40   -
41   -
42   -
43   -
44   -
45   -
46   -
47   -
48   -
49   -
50   -
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   -
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   -
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   -
67   -
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   -
73   -
74   -
75   -
76   -
77   -
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   -
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   -
88   -
89   -
90   -
91   -
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   -

 ENTER

---

---

We have our winners for Vega Bet free raffle round 3. Please check below for winner list.


Verify

Congratulations! We have 9 winners for this round. Rewards will be credited in 2 or 3 days. Stay in touch, we will update here once the rewards are paid.

Best of luck for next round.

Imgur is disabled on Bitcointalk

Many times, I have described the use of debt as a more advance technique that likely would be better to not be deployed until a guy is already used to managing cashflows in regular ways and the guys who had sufficiently build up his cashflow management and/or back up funds.. even though surely guys might prematurely start to use debt when they might not really be ready for it..

Yet.. I think that you and I (@ZeroVinsonN) started out this area of the conversation in terms of how a guy who is considering starting out investing into bitcoin would be treating the debt that he already has in place. .. and in some sense, it hardly even matters how he got into such debt - except perhaps to the extent that he might not be able to change bad habits that he already has.. yet I personally don't want to dwell on those kinds of situations (even though surely each guy has to identify if he has problems and to figure out tactics to fix their problems to the extent that they believe that they have problems).. and it seems that my own emphasis, was pointing out ways to go forward to deal with debt that is already there and not really talking so much about adding new debt, even though surely I can imagine situations in which guys clear up their old debt and get their finances into a stronger place and then go down the road of using debt, again.. which may or many not be a problem, even though surely the use of debt can sometimes have challenges in terms of how the debt is being used and also the accounting for the costs of using the debt versus not using the debt and calculating possible future value from the use of such debt... so in the case of bitcoin, surely a guy could come to his own assessment and he might see that the totality of debt is going to cost him right round 6% per year for the next 5 years, and then he might estimate that bitcoin (or wherever he puts the money from the debt) is likely to perform at a rate that is greater than 6% per year for the next 5 years (and yeah, he may or may not be correct on that), and he may well decide that it is worth it to enter into the debt .. those are individual choices in regards to what tactics to use and the advantages versus disadvantages and if they end up benefiting or losing on their bet, then that is on them too in terms of reaping the benefits or bearing the costs of their actions.


You seem to be over-assuming the terms of the debt and/or the burden of the debt... There are ways to manage debt and to make sure that discretionary funds are still available to invest into bitcoin, even if they might have relatively onerous debt terms.. which is another reason that I would like to repeat that if guys have various sources of debt, then they can potentially figure out ways to resolve (pay off) the most onerous debt first, and yeah, if the whole debt is relatively onerous, they might need to bring the debt down to a certain level of manageability so that they conclude that their discretionary funds are high enough to continue to ongoingly buy bitcoin.  Attempts at smart management of debt does not tend to be all or nothing propositions, even though surely there could be some circumstances in which the debt needs to be either resolved or to brought down to more manageable amounts before resuming investing into bitcoin starts to make more sense.   I tend to place a pretty high priority on both investing into bitcoin and ongoingly building a bitcoin investment, yet surely at the same time, the devil is in the details in regards to conclusions about if their discretionary funds are enough to both allow them to invest in bitcoin and to otherwise allocate towards savings and/or discretionary consumption too (while at the same time servicing their debt(s)).


You are speaking in a bit of gobble-dee-gook, ZeroVinsonN.  If we are initially setting up the terms of debt, then of course, to even be able to take the loan, we have to have enough discretionary income to service such loan, and if the loan has minimal terms, then those would become part of basic expenses.  There can be abilities to pay extra which would reduce future payment requirements.  There can also be options to default or to underpay, which might create more costs depending on default terms and/or if the loan originator is holding collateral. or maybe they know where you are at, so the costs could be the loss of limbs or your life if you default.  Terms are going to vary and some aspects of the terms will be more optional than other aspects.  We are likely getting too much into the weeds on this discussion, and guys can figure these kinds of details for themselves, or maybe create another thread to discuss these kinds of matters, to the extent that they need to be (or want to be) discussed.


Yep.  Collateral versus non-collateral loans makes a difference in options, and guys can still have various aspects of their personal finances in a mess (including outstanding loans) and still invest in bitcoin at the same time while they might be figuring out ways to lessen or resolve various outstanding messy financial circumstances, including but not limited to debt management.


Even though you are using the term "invest" @Bright0515, you seem to be talking about trading.

How could a person consider himself to be investing for 5 years?  What would your example of a guy do at 5 years?  He spent 4 years accumulating and then the BTC price is going up and down, and he is just waiting for the BTC price to go up and then he sells all of his bitcoin?

From my perspective, investing has both an in and out strategy, yet the out strategy would likely not be all at once, unless there was an emergency or perhaps some age consideration that might justify moving from bitcoin into something that is more dollar stable.. based on needs to cash out such as health/age.

Otherwise, if we are planning to get out of bitcoin completely, that sounds like trading rather than investing - especially something like 5 years.

Furthermore, Bright0515, what are you considering that plan for the hypothetical guy that you mentioned to be having a 5-year timeline?

Maybe I can give another hint of what I might consider to be a timeline that is less than 10 years.  Let's say that a guy is in his early 60s when he heard about bitcoin, and so maybe he had been making various investments all of his life that had not really performed too well and he has some retirement benefits, yet they do not really add up to very much.  He was making around $80k per year, and he would like to make $80k per year in his retirement with a 7% per year increase, and so when he looks at his various benefits, he sees that they likely are going to pay him around $35 per year and maybe around 3% per year increase in the cost of living, so he decides to put his value into bitcoin so that the bitcoin can start to supplement whatever income he is going to be able to draw at 65 years old, and so wherever his bitcoin happen to be at 65 years old, he will start drawing from it at that time.  He might even have enough of his current investment portfolio that he is able to pretty much assure that he can put around $160k (2 years of his income) into bitcoin in the next two years (which would end up being right around $1,550 per week)... and then after the first 2 years of buying bitcoin, then he would continue to invest about $300 per week into bitcoin until his retirement 5 years after he started.. and he would start to withdraw at whatever the withdrawal rate would be at that time..

So let's actually apply this guy's situation to what happened in bitcoin in the past 5-ish years, and so let's say that the guy started investing $1,550 per week in bitcoin in January 2021 (of course not really a great time to start, but it is what it is).. So the first 2 years from January 1, 2021 until December 31, 2022 had him investing $162k into bitcoin and he accumulated 5.1 bitcoin.  

Thereafter starting from January 1, 2023 to date, he invested at $300 per week into bitcoin which caused him to invest right around $53k and accumulating right around 1.1 BTC.

So, right now, the guy is going to start his sustainable withdrawal with the amount of bitcoin that he has.  So right now, he had invested a total of $215k, and he had accumulated 6.2 BTC.  We can look at his sustainable withdrawal level, and see that his 200-WMA value for 6.2 BTC is right about $373k, which means that he could start right now withdrawing at $37.3k per year, or better monthly at $3,100 per month... and then also with a 7% increase per year, and so even though this is not the guy's only income it will supplement whatever other income that he has, which likely still will not add up to his earlier income, but it was the best that he was able to do based on his circumstances and his start date from 5 years ago.  He is still not in a bad position, and from my perspective, he would have had been investing rather than trading, even though he had start and end dates that ended up being only slightly more than 5 years (in the example I gave).


I agree with your other points about no guarantee, since of course there are both execution risks and underlying asset risks.


Your merely having faith in bitcoin does not cause it to become more guaranteed to be successful, even though surely you can control various aspects within your own control to attempt to lessen execution risk as much as feasible... even though you might not always know about certain aspects of execution risk and/or  certain aspects of the risks of the underlying asset (bitcoin in this case).


History does not guarantee results, and buying dips is an inferior practice as compared with DCA.


Even if you do everything right and you even have an investment timeline that is 10-15 years or longer, you are not guaranteed to have success (or to be in a better position for having had invested into bitcoin as compared with if you had not).

There are plenty of guys who consider bitcoin to be an asymmetric bet to the upside and perhaps amongst the best of investments (if not the best investment), so they can recognize that as long as they do not leverage the most they could lose is 100% of what they put in, yet they can also structure their own discretionary funds in such a way that allows them to invest as much as they are able to invest into bitcoin without over doing it (in other words in an aggressive way), and yeah, they can monitor their bitcoin investment as it goes and continue to consider whether or not bitcoin's investment thesis is getting weaker, stronger or staying the same with the passage of time.

People usually don't care reading that information, especially if they didn't try to experience those worst situation. But if they tried to get compromised and have hassle experience dealing with their problems on the casino.

For sure that by that time they find relevance reading the TOS at first, when they are still on registration phase to know the rules of the casino. Much better for gamblers that they should not wait for issue to come and better read those important notes, so they can avoid facing any problems.

Most of the players don't truly spend time reading the ToS of these casinos because if they do, most of them wouldn't really feel relaxed while playing because most of these terms gives these casino the right to adjust their ToS at their will and if I'm to answer the question directly, the I would say that, the casino benefit from people not reading their ToS because if people do, they would be more careful.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (57) 14384 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (14) 9689 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2624 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4980 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10741 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4602 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9586 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 8645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +46 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1973 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6543 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6677 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3607 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 9803 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 716 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 4300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3663 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 20616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3048 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9590 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1367 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1734 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1488 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3710 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1154 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3458 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6662 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4163 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2243 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 15353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2221 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +84 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 12222 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1387 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2045 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9640 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3432 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 7385 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1417 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4019 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2649 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5596 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 5647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1890 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3971 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5530 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 7899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1866 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 9678 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6316 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1242 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 7006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8537 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (19 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust:  neutral) (449 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Tenho usado o NordVPN, e estou satisfeito.

Além disso, eles tem demonstrado uma atitude muito assertiva, com relação as tentativas de alguns governos na Europa, com relação a exposição de informações de clientes por parte das VPNs. Eles tem afirmado, que não tem logs e por isso nunca vão partilhar, e estão dispostos a deixar de operar em alguns países.

https://torrentfreak.com/french-court-orders-popular-vpns-to-block-more-pirate-sites-despite-opposition/

Apesar de outras empresas contestarem essas ações dos governos, a NordVPN foi a que tem marcado mais essa posição de "no-log".

Não acho que a galera da rodoviária está usando a Polymarket


Acho que muita gente usou.. a diferença é que ninguém postava nada para entrar na mira e tomar a famosa multa de R$ 50 mil.


Aqui também não.. o negócio é ficar longe dessas grandes operadoras..

---

Governo publicou um vídeo sobre o assunto: https://x.com/govbr/status/2047803189328539791

Falam em "controle de vício" e "proteção da economia".. mas se fosse essa a questão, bastaria criaria uma lei onde quem tem histórico em apostas perderia direitos a auxílios.. mas isso faria eles perderem votos.

Igual quando foi com o twitter, ficou só uma turma de elite. Galera sobrestima o poder de censura do estado.

Eu uso um tal de Eddie VPN, proton eu não confio nem no email, eles peidam muito fácil.

Yeah, when it comes to living off Bitcoin, this is actually a real point that a lot of folks often ignore. There’s quite a big difference between just hodling bitcoin and actually having to depend on your stash for survival.

The part about living within your means is very very crucial for every investor. Whether the investor is in his accumulation phase or already living off his stash, it’s important for their lifestyle to really match the capacity of their Bitcoin stash and not what the actual capacity you feel or wish your BTC would be. I believe your example about the 1 BTC vs 3 BTC clearly explains it perfectly. The difference isn’t just small, it infact changes everything in terms of safety and comfort.

I also think the $500 monthly from 1 BTC you mentioned above is quite honest and realistic. Although for some, this may not be enough to cover for their expenses, in fact it could be more of just support money. So in this situation, the best thing would be to support it with an alternative source of income because relying fully on Bitcoin can be very risky. But with a stash of 3 BTC, there’s a bit more room to withdraw more, and even if it’s not luxury, but it should still be good enough.

Although I don’t really know about the 7% increase part, although it makes sense on paper, but I know that Bitcoin isn’t always steady you know, we do have bad years and good years, some years could be lower and some years higher, so if one attempts to strictly follow that plan, it could cause some complications, like selling low, which of course wouldn’t be all that favourable. That’s why that part, I feel necessary adjustments should be worth considering, as this could potentially be seen as the real backbone of that strategy, not just necessary but very necessary.

In my own personal opinion, I view sustainable withdrawal as less of a fixed formula and more of a kind of dynamic system, although I don’t know, cos I’ve not really reached that stage yet, so I wouldn’t know lol.

In conclusion, I think your framework makes a lot of sense, particularly the part you buttressed on realism, cushioning and most importantly adaptability, because while dealing with an asset as volatile as Bitcoin, surviving in the market isn’t just based on the math holding up, but more about your reaction and response should incase it doesn’t…

Valores maiores, maiores ganhos ou perdas.
Valores menores, menores ganhos ou perdas.

Investir em algo, não depende do seu valor atual, mas sim o valor potencial.
Por isso, mesmo que pouco, investir em BTC é sempre uma oportunidade de bom retorno.

Se o resultado futuro, vai ser igual ao passado? Isso ninguém sabe. Mas, nunca podemos investir a pensar nos ganhos passados. Porque como todo o investidor diz: ganhos passados, não garante ganhos futuros.

Ou seja, se você acredita no Bitcoin, vale sempre apena fazer aquisições, não importa o montante.




Não vai porque?
Talvez porque a malta ficou presa na ideia de hold, em vez da ideia de utilizar.

O objetivo do Bitcoin era mudar o mundo financeiro, mas a malta preferiu pegar nessa narrativa, para usa-lo no mesmo modelo financeiro tradicional, que era suposto combatelo.

O caso NVIDIA é interessante, em 6-7 anos, eles deram um salto que nem eles estavam a espera. Mas, isso também não significa que irão ficar nesse ritmo para sempre. Até porque mais cedo ou mais tarde, eles irão ter concorrência minimamente eficaz. Poderão continuar a ser os melhores, mas não os únicos capazes (como agora quase são).

Weekly update (2026-04-17_Fri_05.18h)


theymos' raw data (format: time    amount    msg    user_from    user_to)
Sample
Full list^* (56 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2453 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:34:06 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to devouring-DARKNESS (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:32:37 AM CEST, Hueristic (history) sent 1 Merit to DireWolfM14 (history) for Re: 🏈🏈 The American Football Discussion Thread 🏈🏈.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:21:10 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Bright0515 (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:18:09 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Sim_card (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
On Fri 17 Apr 2026 04:14:13 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Loyang (history) for Re: Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (588 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8537 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 884 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3753546: mobilelegend (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3753604: pixelsort (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3753630: Anatolii83 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3753717: devouring-DARKNESS (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3753854: wizardotools (history) earned: 13 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample
Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample
Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51245
Sample
Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26607
Sample
Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 329937 (14.37%)
Tuesday 328724 (14.32%)
Wednesday 329358 (14.35%)
Thursday 349683 (15.23%)
Friday 347478 (15.14%)
Saturday 303012 (13.20%)
Sunday 306617 (13.36%)
Total: 2294809

---

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

I doubt that you are getting the right message from me if you believe that merely creating a time target (seemingly less than 4 years) is anything close to a solid investment plan, since preparing the money for a wedding date comes off as gambling to me, unless the wedding might be 6 years or more into the future, and even then it may be problematic to be putting money needed (or wanted) for a wedding into bitcoin... especially if you believe yourself to be an investor rather than a trader or a gambler.


You need to be more specific, especially in terms of the "endless" concept, even though I do know some guys who have amporphous goals and also seem to think that they could never have enough bitcoin. yet it seems that maybe they have not really thought through ideas of what they are wanting to achieve.

I frequently bring up the idea of a guy who might have a certain income level and then maybe having a goal to either replace his income level or perhaps alternatively to get to some amount that is reasonably higher than his current income level.. and some levels of multiples above might be more reasonable than aiming for 10x or 100x or some otherwise seemingly unrealistic level... .. but yeah, guys sometimes seem to trap themselves into frameworks in which they seem to "never have enough," which seems a bit self-defeating.. even though maybe they might be able to figure out ways to become more realistic when they might start to get close to what they consider to be an acceptable goal.. and sometimes the goals might become more concrete when they are closer to being attained rather when they are in their earlier stages and still seeming to be more theoretical than practical.


Some guys cannot help but wanting to compete with others, which might be problematic if they are being unrealistic.


Even if a guy sets a goal for himself, he might frame it in terms of a competition with another version of himself.. so it does seem that some guys might need some comparable measurement in order to motivate themselves, even though as you imply, the competition might sometimes be unrealistic or unhealthy.


He's a trader/gambler, and yeah, maybe it will work out and maybe not.  He can do whatever he likes, but I would not consider him to be "investing," and yeah, he can call it what he likes too, but I would disagree, especially with a 3-4 year timeline (even if it might end up working out for the guy).


Sure.  Living within one's means is important, whether a person is still accumulating, or has reached maintenance phase or might start to employ sustainable withdrawal.

And, he may be using his bitcoin to supplement other income sources that he has or he might be planning to completely live off of the BTC... even though objectively, if a guy already is considering himself at sustainable withdrawal then 1 BTC is ONLY going to have a sustainable withdrawal income that is 1/3 of the 3 BTC.

I calculate that currently 1 BTC will ONLY have a sustainable withdrawal amount of $6k per year or $500 per month, while of course, if 3 BTC is 3x the size then it would have an annual sustainable withdrawal amount of $18k per year or $1,500 per month.  Of course, my own calculations allow the annual dollar rate of the sustainable withdrawal amount to be raised by 7% each year, yet if guys have little to no cushion and they are withdrawing the maximum, then it is possible that the formulas might not work out if they don't have any extra cushion.  So sometimes monitoring and adjustment might have to take place if guys are trying to withdraw at their maximum sustainable withdrawal rate.


Even though I am a pretty BIG advocate of get the fuck started investing in bitcoin as soon as possible once recognizing that discretionary funds are available, at the same time, I think that ongoing studying of bitcoin and reviewing investing and cashflow management systems is an important ongoing process, and surely some guys get quite a bit of pleasure out of monitoring their finances and their progress while other guys want to be less formal and less introspective in regards to how they are investing and how they are managing their cashflows... so from my perspective there should be monitoring and possibly adjusting going on no matter the stage, whether in the accumulation stage, the maintenance stage or the sustainable withdrawal stage.


I think that it matters, and I think that the 200-WMA is the best way to valuate and attempt to help what to do. .at least when it comes to figuring out how close a guy might be to time-based sustainable withdrawal.

Price-based sustainable withdrawal does not rely on the 200-WMA as much (if at all).

So of course, I think it matters, and so far in bitcoin's history, the 200-WMA has ONLY gone up and has tended to be a bottom indicator.. so even if it is not guaranteed, to hold in terms of always going up or being a bottom indicator, it still seems to be a good tool to help in figuring out how to proceed and even to determine if enough bitcoin has been accumulated.
 


Sure. The investor has to figure out how to use the tools, and if he ends up entering into sustainable withdrawal and withdraws too much too soon because he is misreading (and misusing the tools) then, yeah, he could get himself into trouble by not figuring out how to use the tools correctly so that he does not sell too much too soon.

On the other side, I have seen some guys who have enough BTC to start sustainable withdrawal at their chosen income level, yet they are afraid to start, even though they might already have double the bitcoin for their target income level.  So, guys could make the mistake in either direction 1) withdrawing too much too soon or 2) waiting way too long before starting to begin withdrawals.


Well if a guy ONLY has bitcoin and cash, then he may well not be prepared if he has 95% or more in bitcoin and he is not prepared for the price to correct 50% or 75% or more... so yeah, guys could end up getting themselves in trouble if they cannot figure out a comfortable balance.  Some of these concerns might not make as much sense if we are not walking through some examples, since guys could have some income sources and they are merely ongoingly building up their bitcoin investment, yet if they lose their income source, then they might have to start to live off of their bitcoin or they might have to try to find another income source, but if they already have accurately assessed their overaccumulation status based on the 200-WMA and they have a sufficient cushion of bitcoin that is beyond their target levels (such as 2x) then I have a hard time understanding how that would be a problem unless the guy is other wise miscalculating his status based on spot price rather than the 200-WMA.

Maybe I need to give an example?  

If a guy has a target income from his BTC of $80k per year, and he looks up how many bitcoin that he needs, and he sees the bare minimum at this moment for that $80k per year income level is 13.3102 BTC, then maybe he might not rest assured until he gets 50% higher than his bare minimum number.. which would be 19.9653 BTC, so if he still has his job, and maybe he is already making somewhere close to $80k per year in his regular job or maybe he is making less than $80k per year, so isn't the devil in the details regarding if the guy loses his job, and I am not sure if he needs to have other resources, as long as he has enough bitcoin.  Also, there could be a question of how much above his target level of BTC he had accumulated, and whether he is willing to live off less of an income until the sustainable withdrawal rate goes up?  Or maybe you want to say that the guy miscalculated his withdrawal rate in some kind of a way?.. since if he loses his job, he may or may not have a cushion of cash, yet if he has enough BTC, then he does not need any cushion of cash because he has enough or more than enough bitcoin for his targeted withdrawal level

You probably need to clarify what you are wanting to say exactly in terms of any need to diversify, which may not even be necessary if the guy is properly valuating within the context of the 200-WMA instead of making assumptions based on spot prices.


You seem to be overly emphasizing the need to diversify, and you may also be thinking about guys who also don't have any cushion and if they are trying to withdraw from BTC and the quantity of BTC is barely at their required income level. You might need to give an example.

Just my personal opinion, but it seems to me people within the government and regulation of stocks in Brazil want people to stop using Polymarket and gramble with money on those national websites and platforms, because it means there will be an steady flow of income in the form of fees for both private actors and also the government.
Still, it is rather a pointless block, because Polymarket does not need any thing beyond an address and money in other to be useful for anyone, and anyone within the world of cryptocurrency would have a minimum of idea how to handle and VPN and understand how bypass those blocks put in place by governments.

It won't change a thing, unless Brazil starts to prosecute those who violate the blockage and try to bet on polymarket.

a pointless block, like if that is going to stop anyone from accessing polymarket.
but with how countries are blocking stuff left and right, soon VPNs will be on the chopping block.

easy, just become an insider 

or do it like these two guys: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/winning-polymarket-bets-strange-temps-164645591.html
the lengths some people go thru to win on polymarket is crazy.

.

These blocks are always bullshit, I just use a VPN and impersonate my location to Austria or Hungary or something.

I like being able to trade on events and being right on things (but that's a post for another day)


I guess they just want to rug-pull their customers because no way they are going to post trading events, it will just be binary options gambling on stocks.

Yeah, but what if you send BTC with 25% AML score to the empty address that previously had coins with a >60% AML score? Will the new coins, although relatively clean, inherit a bad score due to the history of the address?

Isso depois da chantagem que o Laranjão fez dizendo que não mandaria o swap cambial caso o Mijei perdesse a eleição. Olha que 20 bilhões de Dólares para um país falido é muita coisa.

One thing I have known is that casinos do have a way of updating their TOS so that they don't look too direct when they know that players can use their terms against them in an obvious matter. They do have some restrictions to make it look less severe in most cases so they don't get handcuffed. It is the obligation of players to check the TOS of a casino before ever using any of them.

After such a transaction with dirty bitcoins, both addresses will have an increased AML risk, and transfers from them to the crypto exchange may be blocked.

I don't understand the point of this comparison if the decision to block is made by a centralized URI exchange.

Sim sim, eu fui infeliz na comparação, só usei a mesma analogia considerando que para esse exemplo eu tenho 1 UTXO por semana e também com valor fixo, mas eu entendi.


Certo, concordo que em quantias maiores o lucro é definido nos detalhes... quanto maior o valor menor a taxa, faz sentido.
Mas, da mesma forma quando você vai em um restaurante, você é das pessoas que se negam à pagar os 10% pra "caixinha" dos garçom? 10% é um roubo ou é algo justo?

Enfim, quando falamos de grana todos temos percepções diferentes, eu to confortável com 1% até mesmo quando penso na redução da recompensa/bloco minerado e em uma forma de manter a rede saudável e segura.

When we test the AML score of a service, we always use a new address to make the results as accurate as possible. Has anyone done a similar analysis of coins from the same source sent to addresses with different AML scores?
What is the difference if it is at an address that was previously 'dirty' compared to a new, clean address?

Probably the whole first year of bitcoin, there were probably less than 20 individuals in total mining bitcoin and on CPUs. .not GPUs  or anything fancy.. I think Lazlo figured out the GPU thing in early 2010.. which was part of the reason he started to buy pizzas in around May 2010 with all of the bitcoin he was mining as compared with any other then existing miners at that time (before bitcoin even seemed to have any kind of a price).


In your rendition of the world, as we know it, will there be an "OgNasty is retarded" option?

 

By the way, remember the good ole days when many of us (if not all?) "used to be" pissed off at Paashaas, based on his ongoing, incessant and persistent bear calls - which likely related to his having had sold too much of dee cornz too soon in the mid $30ks.. hahahahahaha

My how times change, no?


You are no fun!!!!!!!



 


In theory, you could stack more coins with the OG fantasy view.

Oh, and by the way, it is a bit presumption to expect high levels of BTC price performance, merely because we had high levels of BTC performance in the past.

Accordingly, it seems way more practical for guys to be preparing for a variety of scenarios, whether we are still accumulating more coins or not... .and yeah, there can frequently be a lack of patience to want to get to a stage of spending coins rather than accumulating them.. which is not as BIG of a problem for guys who have already gotten towards a decently large bitcoin stash and perhaps even to overaccumulation status where they have enough or more than enough bitcoin.

Even lower quantity of coins can be transitioned into sustainable withdrawal without trying to fuck around with trading, once we might figure out that we are no longer in our bitcoin accumulation phase - even though right now, from my point of view, 1.73 BTC only gets you a sustainable withdrawal amount of right around $10,400 per year or $865 per month with a 7% per year increase, which still is not really bad for some people to have such a supplement of sustainable income - until such stage that there might be a determination to start to deplete the principle (which then is no longer sustainable withdrawal).


Sure. Hacking coins is theft, yet changing property rights within the bitcoin code seems way more problematic than someone taking some keys that might have had been vulnerable (supposedly).

---

I think that I fixed the quote that you (OOM) had messed up.  I was going to send you a merit OOM, but you misquoted. 

I think that the quote should have had been like this:


Substantively, I think that you (OOM) are agreeing that bitcoin's asset properties should not be changed.

Yes, the AML score will get lower if you add clean coins to the same address. Lets say someone has $100 worth of coins that have aml score of 50 and if in the same wallet $1000 worth of coins with 0-5 AML score are added the both the coins with high AML and with low AML will be in same wallet. One might needed to move all the coins to another wallet for extra safety and then to exchanges. That way I guess there won't be any issues from exchange's end.

I use Trezor Suite when dealing with Eth and USDt/USDC because of ether.fi (crypto card). The Trezor Suite has great integration with wallet connect, which makes me question the need to use MetaMask.

I'm not saying that MetaMask is disposable, maybe for those who use many altcoins besides Eth, it can be indispensable.

I understand.
However, I believe you have seen casinos that offer deals that sound too good to be true, only to not honour the bonus winnings. I know there are players who are running after bonuses and probably abusing casino promo codes. However, casinos often do not pay out winnings if they were generated from bonuses rather than deposits. So, I think I should appreciate the casino seeing they are giving away free money even if it is for the promotion purposes.

Enquanto as pessoas não perceberem, que a grande vantagem de se ter/usar cripto é controlar o seu próprio capital e não depender de terceiros para fazer o que quiser, vão continuar expostas a este tipo de situações.

Apesar de alguns dentro do Bitcoin, andarem a tentar desestabilizar, o Bitcoin continua a provar ser o mais eficaz para aquilo a que se propôs desde o primeiro dia. Ser um ativo, controlado pelos seus titulares.

Eu não sei vocês mas mesmo recebendo $75 por semana eu não quero pagar isso pra movimentar meu bitcoin. Ainda é uma semana de pagamento e para o Brasil é muuuito dinheiro

Todas as vezes eu usava as taxas mais baixas possíveis mas usaria essa tecnica para economizar se juntasse por um ano

Não conheço, só ouvi falar, mas tenta a AceChange

Certo, mas falando em números absolutos sempre parece exagerado, da mesma forma como 1 dólar pode pagar uma marmita em muito lugar do mundo, em outros não paga nem um cafezinho preto. Então, vamos falar de números relativos? nesse caso ao mesmo valor do que você se refereiu (campanhas de assinatura).

no bitcointalk 52 * $100/semana = $ 5200, não sei como está os pagamentos no altcoinstalks, mas vamos por 50% do valor... adiciona então $2600... $7800 no total
a taxa de $70 que você calculou com 3sat/vbytes que ue comentei anteriormente é menos de 1% dos $7800 ganhos em um ano, isso pra mim é mendigar sim!
Até o padre diz nas missas que devemos dar 10% de dízimo

Claro que eu exagerei, não uso 3 sat/vbytes fixo, quando vejo que 1,5 é o suficiente para confirmação no próximo bloco eu boto isso, mas também nunca coloquei menos de 1.
Confesso que na verdade nunca senti o peso de tantos utxo, eu consumo retirar a grana das campanhas no máximo 1 vez por mês e ir consolidando elas também.

You was really lucky and it was a good decision. Buying ETH at that range was a mistake for me, but I managed my average price so I think I am good haha as I just have to wait now for the next bull season.

I also sold some of my ETH around $3000 and bought again way lower so I am not facing a huge loss here. I don't regret it, you should also not regret because bro, it is ETH, and it will recover eventually due to its high demand, the way Bitmine is accumulating it, I am 90% confident that this time we will see a new ATH. Do you think?

BTC is best though, you did great to convert it to BTC, yep you are right, the rates are way lower than many.

from the start i was trying to understand the uncomfortable truth of most mass and most market, ad supported, or data driven platforms quietly benefit from uninformed_agreement. If TikTok, Meta, or a gacha game made every user read every clause, they’d lose millions. Their model depends on broad permissions that most people wouldn’t grant if they stopped to think.

The story has some validity, Indian tanker named Sanmar Herald might be the scam victim, they might not announce that publicly for the reasons you mentioned regarding legal and insurance reasons.

Tanker Trackers who is a maritime intelligence firm released an audio clip of communication between the said ship and the Iranian Navy and that is how the scam news got leaked.

If every user truly understood the ToS before joining, the number of players could go up or down significantly depending on how comfortable they are with the terms.
This makes it hard to tell whether platforms benefit more from users who fully understand the agreement or from those who never pay attention to it at all.

But the different is Yolodice shut down their operations with announcing to their ANN and gives members time to withdraw all of their funds. Ethan helps members with that so members can taking all of their money including their investment inside Yolodice.

That was a good deal 
I'm not really sure if it will make the difference the OP needs, but sometimes it can even get you a bigger discount
Black Friday is still a ways off, but it’s a great time to buy hardware wallets



I think almost the same, I usually put it this way:

For amounts up to $100, you can use an exchange, a hot wallet, etc
For amounts between $100 and $1,000, learn how to create a secure offline seed phrase
For amounts over $1,000, buy a hardware wallet

Something like that

I think when a person already has ~$1000 in crypto, it's worth investing and Trezor is an excellent choice to start with open source, plug-and-play and self-intuitive. Another alternative is the Bitbox02 Nova.

It's better to spend $50 to $100 (or pay more for a HW plus) than to lose everything. It's ideal to save up and buy a second device for backup, it can even be from another brand, as long as it's open source.

I think you are searching a board to utilise your skills that means you are trying to produce services. For the you can use different marketplace like Fiver, Upwork , Freelancer and many more trusted websites in the internet. Just go there and find your suitable one. Anyway here is also a board which is called Services. Hope you got your answer and you can lock this thread to prevent unnecessary replies.

In between quite a lot of dust spam sent to Genesis block recently, somebody was "generous" enough to trigger a new entry to the table.

Past March 14^th, 2025 large^{equal/over 500k sats} transfers to Genesis block descriptor:

Current balance at time of this post according to combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50BTC of coinbase tx: 107.18864064BTC (includes 9190sat pending confirmation, the difference (0.01670830BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).

This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptor^{see below} accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).

Mas esses hacks também estão em uma quantidade absurda.. e cada vez mais sofisticados (@joker_josue, adivinha em quem colocaram a culpa desse ataque? nos hackers norte-coreanos de novo )

Uma coisa é você fazer um swap e ficar exposto por 5 minutos ao protocolo.. outra coisa é essa galera deixar milhões ali travados rendendo "5% ao ano".. será que vale o risco? talvez essa é a pergunta que estão se fazendo agora, o que explica esse TVL despencando.

 SLOTS

---

1   -
2   - Woodie
3   -
4   - Woodie
5   - RTX-G53
6   -
7   - CONVOAI
8   - Ventazz
9   - Hello5
10   -
11   - Lovelygoldinall
12   -
13   - knuckey
14   - Pmalek
15   - Protonvive
16   - Mr. Magkaisa
17   - Yoona_As
18   - LNC999
19   - Qjmak333
20   -
21   - Pandorak
22   -
23   - tvplus006
24   - malcovi2
25   - LokhcfyBit
26   -
27   - odunybiz
28   - malcovi2
29   -
30   -
31   - ASK Day
32   - f150
33   - Antdm
34   - Zangi777
35   - bitmover
36   - VashaUdacha777
37   - Joy- maker
38   -
39   - masulum
40   - bitzizzix
41   - Danydee
42   - HarvestOpan
43   - HausaBitCkk
44   - vanesha
45   - Ksmertz
46   - Hypnotizer
47   - Leahized
48   -
49   -
50   - masulum
51   -
52   -
53   -
54   -
55   -
56   -
57   -
58   -
59   -
60   - B-BossMan
61   -
62   -
63   -
64   -
65   -
66   - Odenleva09
67   -
68   -
69   -
70   -
71   -
72   - Takiya24
73   -
74   - Ricardo11
75   - Kadelvibess
76   -
77   - WhattheFk
78   -
79   -
80   -
81   -
82   -
83   -
84   -
85   -
86   -
87   - sokani
88   - inearth
89   -
90   - Princexmary
91   - Ninja Primes
92   -
93   -
94   -
95   -
96   -
97   -
98   -
99   -
100   -

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 10 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 75,650]}

bitmover, your bonus has been sent!

🔸 Target block - 945933 🔸

This round’s prize goes to bitmover 🎁 Congratulations!