Last update: 2026-03-17_Tue_13.42h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
bitmover receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. bitmover
2. FeeBuddy
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "bitmover" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66518524 (unedited backup) (by aoluain) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 13:40:55 CET 2026) in When is the next bitcoin?:
There's no such thing as the next Bitcoin. Bitcoin is just Bitcoin, and that's it. Even if another digital asset emerges after it, it will still just be another asset that might have characteristics that make it good and popular. But right now, I can say that no other digital asset can compete with Bitcoin --- because Bitcoin isn't just another digital asset, it's decentralized and has no centralized entity, which makes it trustworthy and reliable.
I think OP wants" another bitcoin" just to make money.
and you know there is nothing holding him back, he can go ahead and create a new Bitcoin...
just like the thousands who have tried - and failed, they are all listed on coinmarketcap.
How exactly does he propose in a way to move everyone using Bitcoin now to a "new" version?
Bitcoin is proven, a new version is not
Every other $hitcoin has tried and failed and set the stage for any more "editions".
Anyone trying to create a new Bitcoin would have to at least create a superior code, convince
as many people to adopt it and would have to be prepared to disappear and relinquish
all their coin holdings, just like Satoshi did. Thats the minimum!
2. Post 66517548 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 05:15:02 CET 2026) in Buy every dip, and HODL!:
Those who do market research to invest in Bitcoin may be unable to sustain their investment. The investor is inside the current market with a slight improvement, so a person who follows the DCA method regularly will never do market research for Bitcoin investment because he will maintain the continuity of purchase. If you invest for a long time by maintaining the continuity of Bitcoin purchase, the success of Bitcoin investment will definitely be ensured, because the possibility of profit will increase greatly if the portfolio is large due to investing in Bitcoin for a long time. Therefore, Bitcoin is the most profitable in the long term and helps reduce risk.
Doing market research is actually not too bad to do but when the goal is long-term then don't get too hung up on short-term movements.
I think understanding the market as an additional knowledge is not something negative because it can also make our knowledge and experience increase. What needs to be avoided here is not about understanding the market movement but the response that we do afterwards.
There is a concern for some people (especially for beginners) to make short-term market understanding as a reference that they have to get out when from the beginning they want to make this a long-term investment.
It is not the understanding of the market that is dangerous but our response to the market because we feel that our speculation can come true so we actually make the wrong decision when we see market movements.
The bitcoin market (as compared with other places that money can be placed) is only 1 out of my 9 items to consider, so it seems to me that various personal cashflow management factors play a pretty strong role.. likely even more important than our assessment of bitcoin.
Accordingly, if you are mixing up your trading ideas with investing, then you are likely trying to ascribe the same short-term profit motives onto investors, even though there is no reason for investors to be overly focusing on profits as you seem to be proclaiming to be the case, but instead it is more likely that guys with an investment approach to bitcoin are focused on ongoingly building up their bitcoin stack (through ongoing buying) rather than getting distracted by whether or not they might be able to extract some dollars or other nonsense that you seem to be implying to be the supposed "profit motives" of everyone.
Crypto was a bit the precursor to what LinkedIn is these days. You made one trade? You are now a trader. You bought something once, call yourself an investor. Read Coindesk a few times per week, call yourself an enthusiast and so it goes.

When I think about how many people have lost or are still losing money in future because they believe that they are traders after having a few trades, or even worse they believe that they know what they are doing after being lucky a few times it is a bit sad. Sadly with some of these people education or warnings don't work either, I had a few times where I warned a few mates against using leverage. They got lucky a few times with small plays and this is why they insisted that they can do it, later they lost the majority of their stash.

I understand that it can take a while to learn, and surely there are a lot of folks who really think in a kind of gambling way, which might be that so many folks do not even know how to invest.. and so if we have even a lot of newbies into bitcoin who have never invested, then they might have some difficulties figuring out how to get into the right kind of a mindset.
Whether on this forum or even in real life, I try to suggest that guys ease into building getting started, so then once they get started buying every week or whatever, then maybe at some point they can ramp up their level of investing, and it can even take a bit of time to get some accounts set up or to figure out from where they might source their coins in the beginning... yet of course, on the forum, we cannot necessarily know the options that might be available to people in differing geographical locations - even though in recent times, I have not really seen too many members complaining about their coin sourcing options .. even though surely it can be a bit of a factor to figure out in some locations.
You are wrong when you are suggesting such high focus upon "profits".. so in that regard you seem to be unable to discuss the matter properly because you cannot even remove yourself from a trader mentality... so then you proclaim that everyone has the same mentality about profits, when they don't.
It is quite unusual for the user to suggest that speculation is necessarily where the history of Bitcoin and data about it shows is that those that don't speculate and just invest for the long term have significantly outperformed everyone.
We cannot really guarantee that the long term ongoing accumulation is going to continue to be profitable, and we might even assert that the future bitcoin price slope might be less steep than it has been historically, yet at the same time, there is no real data to support any assertion that bitcoin's investment thesis is weakening with the passage of time, so in that sense, even a brand new bitcoiner should consider figuring out ways to get started investing into bitcoin and to focus on trying to figure out ways to ongoingly accumulate bitcoin within an amount that they consider to be workable for their own cashflows, and surely there are some guys who have very little back up funds, and they likely need to make sure that they have back up funds if they are going to be investing into bitcoin for long periods forward, since there surely can be challenges to have a lot of confidence about not being tempted to tap into our bitcoin investment if we are not putting systems/practices into place that gives us some cushion in the event that our income might go down and/or our expenses might go up and we want to be able to continue to build our bitcoin for 4-10 years or longer, even if there might be some periods in which we might not be in a position to continue to add to our bitcoin stash that we are hopefully ongoingly building until it gets to a reasonable decently sized amount.
Trading in Bitcoin but even worse in crypto which is what many normal people who call themselves traders in this space also do is very risky, for shitcoins it is like playing in a casino. It works well until that one moment where everything is lost and one can never recover to that point unless you put in a lot more money to buy back everything that you have built.
There are some folks who have somewhat degenerate personalities, yet if they could figure out how to at least limit the amount of their exposure to either trading and/or to shitcoins (perhaps to less than 10% of the size of their bitcoin holdings, then they might have some chance of learning their way out of such bad habits, yet so many times, there can be difficulties for guys to limit their own bad habits.. since they might have inclinations to go beyond their self-imposed limits, and then it just becomes an ever growing devolution.. that they might not be able to control.. so yeah, it can be difficult for guys who already have such gambling inclinations.
I should not even have to explain, yet a guy who ongoingly accumulates bitcoin, then sure he may well get to a position of having way more options if the value of his holdings goes shooting up, so then how many bitcoin in the holdings has a compounding effect, yet in the meantime, if he is accumulating 4-10 years or longer, he may well just stay focused on accumulating, and sure, he might also have spreadsheets and assessments of the value of his holdings as compared with the value that he put in, yet he may also have abilities to continue to stay focused on ongoing accumulation and making assessments in regards to how many bitcoin he might need, and sure if he had been accumulating 10 years or more, he might get to a place where his bitcoin may or may not be in profits, yet he is at an age where he still might have to consider the extent to which he might transition from accumulating and needing to transition into some form of withdrawal from his bitcoin holdings, whether he might calculate sustainable withdrawal or some other forum of withdrawal, so he makes his assessment about what to do based on how many bitcoin he has and the value of his bitcoin holdings a that time, and not in regards that they may or may not be "in profits."
I believe that there are actually very few reasons to stop accumulating. Sure we can think of specifics like reaching your own goal, the old established goal but why stop there?
Of course, each person has to consider his own situation and the extent to which it might be practical to change his goals (to make them higher) once he had already reached them. Surely I understand that sometimes guys might set their goals too low, so there can be some reasonable basis for making the goals higher after they had been reached... and so surely the guy has to account for his own factors.. and then what it might mean to him to continue to want to accumulate more bitcoin when he may well have enough and/or even more than enough... and so maybe it is difficult to talk about these kinds of ideas in the abstract, since if we are working with a set of particulars, we may well recognize and appreciate how at some point enough, should be enough, and getting to the status of enough could open doors to have the freedom to quit ones job and to be able to live off of his bitcoin for the rest of his life.
Of course, your registration date is less than a year ago, so maybe we need to use a guy with a longer history, and sure we can change around the particulars, yet I am trying to show at what point a guy might have had reached enough or more than enough.
So, let me use an example of a guy who perhaps came to bitcoin in his mid 30s towards the beginning of 2016, and at that time, he had been perhaps attended some college, and he had been working for the past 10 or more years, and maybe he had some success and/or not, yet his income was around $30k per year, and his then investment portfolio was around $45k.. .. so he was not in a bad place, but he still wanted to be able to retire in his early to mid-50s, so maybe he first heard about bitcoin around that early 2016 time, so he considered that maybe he could take around $10k from his already existing investment portfolio and put that into bitcoin, and otherwise he would continue to invest in bitcoin at a pace of around $100 per week (which was around 17.33% of his income).
He started out by investing the $11k in bitcoin between January and March 2026 - so he accumulated 27.25 BTC
Then thereafter starting from April 1, 2016 until now, he invested $100 per week into bitcoin, which added up to another $52k invested and 12.1 BTC.
So up until now he had invested right around $63k into bitcoin and he has 49.35 bitcoin. I have a hard time concluding that the guy does not have enough or more than enough bitcoin, since his income was $30k per year, and perhaps his goal would have had been to have an income of around $80k per year and not having to work, yet right now he could get a sustainable income of
$80k per year for right around 15.2 BTC per yearYet, right now his 49.35 BTC will support an income that is about 3x his goal and right around 8x the $30k per year income that he had been making. Sure, the guy is in his mid to late 40s because he is 10 years older, yet he is also ahead of schedule in terms of options.
You can quibble with the example, yet my main point is that there can be enough or more than enough, whether the person might be wanting to merely replace his current standard of living or perhaps to increase his standard of living by some reasonable multiple higher. If the guy says that he is not going to stop untiil he is a billionarie, or that he is making over a million per year from his bitcoin, then he has a right to do those things even though they might not be necessary, especially some folks do not necessarily want to change their llfestyle in magnitude kinds of ways.
Particularly in cases where your financial situation has been improving in parallel due to improved skills, experience and career growth then one should revise their targets accordingly. I mean someone earning $30k a year should not have the same target if they were realistic as someone earning $300k, right? What do you think?
Sure, within reason, and yeah, some guys get stuck in certain kinds of jobs and perhaps limited skills and other guys get raises along the way, yet if they are doubling or tripling their current standard of living that seems reasonable, and perhaps they can fit into something like a 10x increase, yet some levels of increases in the standard of living might be harder to adapt into.
One of the problems that I anticipate is that sometimes guys might keep setting their goals higher because they could be having difficulties figuring out how to transition.. and maybe they are greedy or they want power and status.. so I cannot necessarily blame them unless they might be interfering with their own ability to figure out that there might be points that are "enough" or "more than enough." And, yeah none of us can answer for anyone else in terms of how much might be enough or more than enough.
Even though many longer term bitcoiners have gone through a lot of ups and downs in the value of their bitcoin holdings, there are likely a decent number of bitcoiners who have held onto their bitcoin and continue to hold onto their bitcoin holdings even though their holdings have been in profits pretty much from the start of their investment into bitcoin - especially if you look back at bitcoiners who have been in bitcoin for 10 years or more.
You think that they are motivated by profits? For example, if some of the longer term HODLers have bitcoin holdings that are in the $500 per coin (or perhaps less?) territory, they have a lot of fluctuation in the value of their holdings, yet they have largely been in profits since mid 2016, and their holdings had gone all the way up to 252x and then back down, so up and down with their "level of profits." Right now with current BTC prices, the "profits" of the BTC holders who have average BTC prices of $500 or lass are hovering around at least 148x, so how exactly would you suggest that their management of their holdings is motivated by profits? It seems a bit vague and inexact to frame their motives in terms of profits, no?
The fluctuations are huge in the returns in those periods. Just the last comparison of the peak of $120k and now around $74k is a huge swing in terms of potential profits, but those that are not motivated by this at all do not really care about it. The user is mistaken to imply that they are concerned with profits, if they did they would try to sell at peaks and not ride the roller coaster through multiple cycles and not selling anything at all.
Even if we give an example that might be a guy who had accumulated north of 100 bitcoin between 2014 and 2016.. so then perhaps his average cost per BTC could be $500 per coin.. so then the more importan question might be how many coins he has rather than how much in profits he might be or not. ..
Sure, if he had 100 bitcoin, then he would have had been worth $12.6 million when BTC prices were $126k, buty then ONLY worth $6 million when prices dropped to $60k and so now with prices around $75k, he would be worth $7.5 million.
But if he figures out the income that he can draw from his holdings, then maybe that is the more important matter, and maybe he is drawing a few hundred million per year, then he is not necessarily in jeopardy, even though from time to time, he might purposefully choose to shave off some extra coins.
3. Post 66516986 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 23:37:19 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Time will tell if this rally gets any where near 118k and is a real bull and not a baby bull.
Oh gawd..

There is no such thing as baby bull. Baby bulls are like fairies..
Imaginary.
Aww! That one hurt a little.
Don't shoot the messenger.., as "they" say.
We’re currently on a run of 8 consecutive daily green candles. I really hope this doesn’t end with one nasty red, Darth Maul daily candle, erasing over a weeks worth of gains like we’ve seen so many times before.
I don’t have any real hope short term as we are still in a bear market which I don’t think has bottomed yet. I would love so much to be wrong though and the bottom is already in as people rotate out of metals and stocks, pumping money into Bitcoin as we hit new all time highs in the second half of 2026.
Shit, I’m talking myself into a short term bullish mindset. Let’s ******* go, pump the orange coin.
Yeah but?
Have you bought any back? As a hedge?
None of us can be "that" confident about our believes in which way the BTC price may or may not go.
Support at $72,000 must hold. Then, let's hope we clear the $79,000 resistance point soon - and then it's 'Go' time. We just don't want it to go down below $72k, but instead clear $79k... Go, go, go!
Dee actual cornz (have you heard about it?) no give no shits about your random expectations regarding what "needs to" happen to it, or not.
@sminston_with
It's interesting to see the overlap between Bitcoin's 200WMA and its estimated Cost of Production.
First off: the price (~$74,000) is sitting within about 1% the power law 'average' production cost.
2nd: these metrics suggest we're not where you think we are in the market cycle.
- - - - - - -
You'll notice there are several of these 'plateaus' in the 200WMA - and when they transition from one plateau to the next one up, typically pushing the WMA itself ABOVE the CoP, it is during these transitions when a bull run happens.
This time - since the FTX crash/end of 2022 - the price rose 7.8x despite have NO detectable plateau-plateau transition - in fact that whole time, the 200WMA has been trending downward, the same as how it has done every time during an 'accumulation market,' NOT a bull market.
Your use of the English language comes off as wee bit confusing, especially the idea of "trending down."
FYI. So far in bitcoin's history, the 200WMA has never trended down - sure there have been times when it was less steep, but the 200-WMA never trended down.
You can punch in various numbers and look at the 200-WMA history (
look here), and you likely will see that between June 2022 and October 2023, the BTC price spent a whole hell-of-a-lot of time below the 200-WMA and even got as low as 36% below the BTC price at the peak, yet even during that worst period of time, the 200-WMA continued to go up at least $10 per day and including overall yearly average that never went below 1% annual increase.
So FYI.. "diminishing up" is not the same as "trending down."
I believe this supports the ISM PMI theory; this has NOT been a bull run, its been a pseudo-bull run, similar to 2019.
Aren't you the BIGGEST party poop in the world.
As you recall our price increase from April 2019 to June 2019 was about 3.5x from $4,200 to $13,880, so it was only half way back to the ATH and then a regression back to the starting point, including the March 2020 fluke down to $3,800.
so yeah, that 2019 boost was preceded by around a 84% correction through 2018.
Of course, this also implies that we HAVE BEEN down the bear market path for some time, and once the business cycle picks up again (may be happening in a matter of months or less), Bitcoin price could start to experience the turnaround we've all been watching for.
Current BTC Price: $74,324
200-Week MA: $58,751 (BTC is +26.5% above)
CoP Power Law: $73,523 (BTC is +1.1% above)
https://x.com/sminston_with/status/2033558660363022846Even better visualized with the CoP power law as the residuals baseline:

Visualized equally clearly with the .05 Quantile Power Law baseline:

Your squigglies are far from convincing. If I just spit-ball the situation, it seems equally plausible that we could be going through some variation of the 2021 double top scenario.
Nothing wrong with attempting to prepare for both down and up, as long as you don't fail/refuse to be adequately prepared for up.
4. Post 66516646 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 22:01:25 CET 2026) in Duel.com -- The first casino with 0% house edge games:
I agree that it is unusual.
How do they make money? Does anyone know? I would like to understand better their business model
It's pretty simple really. They basically substituted bonuses which are usually given by many crypto gambling sites with this zero percent house edge model on their originals only upto a certain amount after which 0.1% house edge applies.
They make money primarily through their other high house edge games and through the vig in their sports betting section.
tbh, this is really genius, the 0% house edge is like a loss leader, they use it to get players in, then they make their money from slots and sports.
Is there any way to verify that one is playing with 0% house edge until $50k wager is done? Or one is playing with 0.1% house edge after $50k wage.
Yeah, you can verify it easily by using wagering strategies. The house edge is always 0.10% on the in-house games of Duel.com. They give back the 0.10% commission as rakeback until you wager $50k in a day. After that, they won't give you any rakeback. You have to play for a few hours with a decent bankroll to verify that by using a proper wagering strategy.
an easier way (that requires no gambling) would be to just check the payout/win chance. on a simple 2x on dice, the win chance is 49.95, so 49.95 + 49.95 = 99.9, and 100 - 99.9 = 0.1% which is the house edge.
5. Post 66516334 (unedited backup) (by nikolaspaolo) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 20:20:37 CET 2026) in Como vocês estão fazendo com o KYC?:
Cada dia que passa fica mais difícil conseguir achar e confiar em novos colegas... Com isso a possibilidade de acumular sem KYC vem diminuindo...
Abro esse campo aqui para a gente não só trocar experiencias sobre os atuais meios de acumular sem KYC, mas também sobre a real necessidade em tempos atuais. Qual a opiniào dos colegas?
Comprar bitcoin sem kyc , com fiat, a melhor forma é a bisq. Nao tem taxa qusse nenhuma e é descentralizado. A peach vc entra ja perdendo 2%.
Ou entao p2p com algum conhecido
Aqui tem o nikolaspaolo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1497675Voce pode tentar comprar com ele
hahahahaha
a Bisq do Brasil, ultima vez que vi, tinha 10 mil reais de volume mensal, e as ordens eram tipo, 5 a 55% de taxas, tipo assim, cem reais, 50 reais, na época maior ordem que vi lá foi algo como 2 mil reais......surrreal kkkkk
Acho que nem bandido, girando dinheiro ilegal aceita operar ali kkkkkkk
Eu tenho uma corretora, cumprindo regulacao, nao opero com ninguem sem KYC, Até porque nao faz sentido, o cara tem KYC 100% no banco e na corretora quer 0%, só se eu fosse louco de operar dinheiro de pix, sem saber quem é a outra ponta.
O que é muito engracado, que a maioria que procura anonimato(por mais que nao exista) no sistema bancario, nao chega nem perto do limite fiscal de isencao. Dos 35 mil reais mensais.
OU quando nao, é um cara meio louco que aparece do nada, fez uma declaracao de estudante, abriu conta nubank com meio salario minimo e vem querer perguntar como faz pra comprar 1 milhao de reais sem ser notado kkkkkkkk
Voce quer ser anonimo? Seca sua conta bancaria, troca 1 pizza por alguns bitcoins, mas jamais use o banco, pois pra usar o banco, voce ja fez 100% de KYC, qualquer caminho que envolva o banco, é impossivel ser anonimo...
6. Post 66516192 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 19:38:55 CET 2026) in Jogos na Steam foram identificados como distribuidores de malwares:
Não me surpreende saber que a Steam também passa por isso; o que me preocupa é que não tem como saber qual jogo é confiável dentro da plataforma. É responsabilidade deles verificar antes de disponibilizar os jogos para os usuários.
Um absurdo.
Uma plataforma paga , que fatura milhoes, deixa passar código malicioso em programs e depois coloca eles ali pra download.
Entendo que devem existir dificuldade técnicas, mas uma empresa tao dum setor que fatura tanto tem que ter controles melhores.
Obrigado por compartilhar
É verdade, mas é algo muito complicado de identificar, se estiver bem camuflado.
Sim, eles faturam milhões. Mas a Google fatura muito mais e continua a deixar passar coisas do género na sua loja.
Alem disso, ao que parece foram jogos propostos pela comunidade, que teoricamente já foram jogados por muitas horas antes de entrar na plataforma.
Enfim, nao estou a defender eles.
Logicamente que devia ter melhor controlo e validar mais a fundo estes jogos independentes.
Certamente irão melhorar. Até porque acho que este foi o primeiro caso que ocorreu. Eles certamente não querem este tipo de casos no futuro.
7. Post 66515875 (unedited backup) (by Pumared) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 18:20:55 CET 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
O diesel sempre foi um problema no Brasil e até então nunca teve alguém disposto a resovler de verdade, sem contar o LIXO que é o biodiesel que arrebenta com os carros, aonde já se viu um combustivel que vai resto de gordura de peixe, gordura de animais, um monte de porcaria que dizem ser melhor para o meio ambiente, mas detona com tudo, encarecendo ainda mais os fretes por conta de maior manutenção de motores, bicos e bombas injetoras... cara... o diesel brasileiro APODRECE em menos de 1 mês, é coisa de maluco, vira uma borra, entope tudo, detona com os motores, e um motor diesel pra você arrumar passa fácil de 40, 50 mil reais! isso de carros pequenos, de caminhoes passa facil disso.. enfim, nossa gasolina é uma bosta, mas o diesel é um negocio bem crítico, de verdade, e ainda querem aumentar essa porcaria de biodiesel pra 30% ...
Outro dia vi uma entrevista com o Renan dos Santos. Ele falando o básico: temos que fazer rodovias.
Dai todo mundo fala : "Nossa, seria incrível". E ele "incrível nada. Isso é baśico. Inglaterra fez isso no seculo XIX. São madeiras com um ferro no meio"

Isso que o governo deveria estar fazendo, e não taxando exportação de petroleo.
Eles nunca fariam isso mas com toda certeza deve ter algum sindicato fazendo lobby para que isso não aconteça hoje. Mas no passado, o JK poderia ter aberto rodovias e ferrovias, mas decidiu somente por rodovias visando o setor automobilístico. Os frutos colhidos de hoje são: Nenhum desenvolvimento nacional considerável. Acho que fazer ferrovias em países continentais é uma boa prática, só pensar em qualquer país minimamente grande e comparar. mas para variar somos o país atrasado
8. Post 66515605 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 17:18:07 CET 2026) in Duel.com -- The first casino with 0% house edge games:
I agree that it is unusual.
How do they make money? Does anyone know? I would like to understand better their business model
It's pretty simple really. They basically substituted bonuses which are usually given by many crypto gambling sites with this zero percent house edge model on their originals only upto a certain amount after which 0.1% house edge applies.
They make money primarily through their other high house edge games and through the vig in their sports betting section.
9. Post 66515411 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 16:31:19 CET 2026) in [R$ 100] Sorteio para reviver nossa aba:
Sorteio valendo R$ 100 em Bitcoin para reviver nossa aba..
Para participar, basta
marcar um membro inativo de nossa comunidade local.. se quiserem, podem escrever um texto explicando a escolha, mas não é obrigatório.
Regras:
Entradas em ordem de chegada
1 entrada por pessoa (os invativos que voltarem também podem participar)
Sem nomes repetidos
Prazo final para entradas: 1º de maio
Sorteio no bloco 950.000 (~18 de maio), usando o
https://bitcoindata.science/giveaway-manager/
10. Post 66513744 (unedited backup) (by BlackBoss_) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 04:29:31 CET 2026) in When is the next bitcoin?:
I think OP wants" another bitcoin" just to make money.
Ofc there isnt a next bitcoin, but there are maby other opportunities to make money. TSLA, NVIDIA, surged after bitcoin and many other opportunities will show up.
But people need to look out of the crypto market as well . Keep eyes open and willing to take risks.
If it is "another bitcoin" in cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, there will be high probability of another scam altcoin. I don't say all altcoins are scam but if their projects are quality and their founders, developers are capable of initiating and developing their projects well, they won't need to advertise their projects as "another bitcoin" or "next bitcoin".
Don't buy altcoins because they are top altcoins and that is true like "Don't buy coins because they are next bitcoins".
11. Post 66512728 (unedited backup) (by Dogedegen) (scraped on Sun Mar 15 21:10:07 CET 2026) in When is the next bitcoin?:
There's no such thing as the next Bitcoin. Bitcoin is just Bitcoin, and that's it. Even if another digital asset emerges after it, it will still just be another asset that might have characteristics that make it good and popular. But right now, I can say that no other digital asset can compete with Bitcoin --- because Bitcoin isn't just another digital asset, it's decentralized and has no centralized entity, which makes it trustworthy and reliable.
I think OP wants" another bitcoin" just to make money.
Ofc there isnt a next bitcoin, but there are maby other opportunities to make money. TSLA, NVIDIA, surged after bitcoin and many other opportunities will show up.
But people need to look out of the crypto market as well . Keep eyes open and willing to take risks.
Maybe we can put it differently, there will be many opportunities to make money close to the returns that Bitcoin has given but there will never be another Bitcoin. It can not be denied that in shitcoins and outright scam coins there were huge money making opportunity. This is not just limited to the current top shitcoins like Ethereum and Solana, but also to some that are now basically dead. There were times that you could get a 1000 fold return or more on those. However none of them are alike to Bitcoin at all with the exception of Monero and Litecoin that have some resemblance. The usual shitcoin is completely centralized, full of marketing lies and an organization that is doing everything in their power to promote and lie about it. Bitcoin is decentralized, it evolved its decentralization naturally and this is something that can not be replicated in an artificial way. That is what many greedy project founders do not understand, that is why they will continue to make shitcoins and tokens that will fail.
The world does not need more tokens, smart contracts, layer 1 chains, or none of that nonsense. You can build the whole world on Bitcoin using a layered stack.

12. Post 66512524 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sun Mar 15 20:15:43 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
-Yes, it seems to be a very risky long-shot, but, the price being close
to the average of 200W as it is now, makes the week-average of 200
in the long term not grow so much in value, I take into account the
points at which the price is for a certain period below the average of 180W
from time to time, just as I marked in the weekly chart below.

-So, looking at these markings in which the price is for a little period below
the 180-week average, it is noted that the price of Bitcoin has hardly lost
and or stayed below the average of 200W, and it is also noted that
these are strong points of buying volume.
Can this scenario change?, this is the question that remains,
taking into account that past movements do not dictate future movements.
I see no reason for you to change the indicator. The 200-WMA is commonly used, so let's stick with that.
Sure
there are periods that the BTC price has been close to the 200-WMA and even bouncing below it for extended periods of time, such as from June 2022 until October 2023, yet the overwhelming majority of the time, the BTC price has been at least 25% above the 200-WMA.
Sure it is not guaranteed that the bitcoin price will continue to spend an overwhelming majority of its time at least 25% above the 200-WMA, yet there is no real eveidence in place to suggest that bitcoin's investment thesis (or even price performance thesis) is getting weaker with the passage of time... so in many senses, bitcoins price performance thesis of mostly staying at least 25% above the 200-WMA.. remains intact and no reason to discount it or dismiss it, yet.
So, I say that the price in 2027 will be below the average of 200W,
is practically an unfounded statement, practically not applicable, however,
we can risk that it will be below the average of 180W based on one of
my most recent theories that come up a lot daily in my head,
and this theory has been hammering my neurons a little for a few months.
First off. Fuck the 180WMA, and the fact that you even consider your own earlier dumbass statement to be unfounded does not help us to be continuing to blabber on about such largely irrelevant nonsense.
In this theory, I base myself on the formation of the shoulder head shoulder pattern
in the monthly that was not materialized.
This formation started after the price left 60k in October 2024,
and went up to 109 in or until January 2025., and then falling to 76/80k
in March 2025 forming the left shoulder, when it started a new high
in April 2025 going until October 2025, where it formed the head at 126k,
starting the bearish leg, which seemed to be held at the 80k support
to then start the third bullish leg, which would possibly form
the right shoulder with suggested resistance at 104~108k....
-But no, 80k didn't hold the selling pressure, leading the price
to lose that 80k support and reach 60k.
And this is where my unsubstantiated crazy theory comes into play.
So, we can say that, big players, realized that other big players would try
this formation and entered into a dispute, while some sold, others composed,
and then they realized this fight, and entered into an agreement,
that it would be better for everyone if the price would return to the territory
to the 60~70k area and make an accumulation, leading to understand
that this could be a bear trap that lost support at 80k,
And then as soon as these players come to an agreement,
the price will go back to 80k, and then they will continue that bullish leg
that will go out of 80k and go up to 108k, and then they will start
the bearish leg of the shoulder head shoulder formation,
taking the price below the 60k range and or holding on to that 70k accumulation
that has been made, and we won't have lower prices than that from then on...
Starting the bullish rally that will aim for the price to go beyond 156k
and go up to 180k, leaving the territory free for an infinite rally.
You are just making up various mostly non-sensical ideas and attempting to give some credit to your random fantasies by writing them down. What a waste of time.
And or else, in the worst case, the price stabilizes at 100k and
we will not see a new high... And then go to zero, as many experts say,
this is just another bubble and bitcoin died hahahaha....
But, considering this theory that I just mentioned,
which you will not find on the internet, as I just wrote it,
we can say that, in January 2027 the price may be below the average of 180W,
and then in early 2028, the price may be above the average of 180W,
at least that 10%, where I believe that it will be above 80K
Fuck your dumbass reference to the 180 WMA.. Snap the fuck out of your out-of-touchedness and desires to pump out "novel" (largely fantasy) theories.
Right now the 200-WMA is right at $58,814, and so in recent times it is going up at around $30 per day (26%-ish on an annualized basis for the past 12-ish months), so at the end of May, it is quite likely to be above $61k.. In early 2027, it is quite likely to be above $68k, and in early 2028, it is quite likely to be around $85k. Even though my numbers are not updated, you can get ideas regarding how the 200-WMA is likely to progress from
my fuck you status table.
-Monthly chart explaining what I just wrote in an easy and intuitive way
to understand a probability of what can and cannot happen...
Easy, very easy hehehe...


For sure, you are spouting out just randomly made up nonsense.
13. Post 66509671 (unedited backup) (by Floczy) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 22:10:14 CET 2026) in Trump's desperate destabilizing wars. Invading Venezuela. Gold up. Bitcoin down.:
The only reason they would go to places like US is because in comparison to their own economy, the US economy is more stable with less inflation; otherwise nobody in their right mind goes to a place with the highest gun violence, extremely high cost of living, terrible healthcare, a culture of old immigrants hating new immigrants, and a lot more.
I don't think it is better to let people die and get murdered by a tyrant because that is a "domestic matter". I will support anyone that removes a tyrant.
You are wrong about Venezuela. It has much more gun violence than any country in the world, maybe even more than Ukraine.
USA is one of safests countries in the America (continent) when you talk about gun violence (USA has about 4 deaths every 100,000 people, brazil has 15, Venezuela has 44)
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_homicide_rateshttps://www.jacksoncountycombat.com/1113/Facts-Stats-Counties-With-Highest-Firear
Cost of living in Venezuela is also terrible, because people cant make money. An engineer there makes about 80-100 usd per month. I have worked with many of them, I know what I am talking about.
It's a different case of you solely talk about gun violence,
But when you talking about some relocating or going to another country, you should talk about the safety overall, not just about gun violence, a country might have low firearm homocide rates but still face safety issues like crime, drug trafficking, rape, racism etc...
And America is not a country you will call safe in the general term of safety, they are part of the top 5 country with the highest racial discrimination, that alone is enough reason for one not to move to such a country, but based in economical advantage US has over other countries some immigrants has less of a choice that to take advantage of it.
14. Post 66507949 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 13:19:43 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (59) 14311 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (21) 9461 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 4778 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 1730 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 2675 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 10573 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4569 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3385 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 9380 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6186 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 8519 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 1817 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 6155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2448 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2035 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 199 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 480 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (9) 6502 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (36) 1860 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2850 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 224980:
cryptodevil (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (5) 254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 13050 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6089 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6657 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 6630 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +8 / =4 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3493 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 9613 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 704 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (26) 4260 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3561 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 11269 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11600 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4518 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2594 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 4373 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (66) 20319 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 6293 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2988 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 9315 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 698159:
Jet Cash (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2070 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 1360 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3928 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 448 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1574 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1487 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3656 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1136 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6623 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 4155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 1846 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2219 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 15206 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2203 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3240 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (38) 11893 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1179651:
sheenshane (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1361 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2235 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2033 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 9262 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2478 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3325 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 7311 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 11257 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1668017:
anonymousminer (
Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1404 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 3912 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2608 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 20075 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2491 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 2472 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 2520 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (28) 5462 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 5506 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1529 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 1887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1218 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 823 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1135 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5497 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 7784 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1857 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 9558 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5177 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 9429 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 6262 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1239 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3260 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 3373825:
paid2 (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3763 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 3373858:
n0nce (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (8) 6057 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 3486361:
PowerGlove (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6924 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3540187:
apogio (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2387 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +43 / =0 / -0) (
8393 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
878 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (
191 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 3318:
Luke-Jr (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
196 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: neutral) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 10354:
JJG (
Trust: neutral) (
10 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 10502:
SgtSpike (
Trust: neutral) (5 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 11275:
wariner (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 12089:
piotr_n (
Trust: neutral) (
447 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. Post 66507532 (unedited backup) (by Somegory) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 09:22:37 CET 2026) in [Newbies] Read this before you stake an address:
And for someone who likes privacy more they won't want to share their main BTC address to avoid balance reveal to the public.
It's all well and good.
You can share an address with zero balance that you will never use. It doesnt matter, and it wont reveal anything about it.
You just to prove that you owned the private key at the time you staked the address and you still own it now (when claiming the account)
This is true 😩😩😩 my brain isn't braining, if not, why didn't I think of this before? Thanks for the heads up
16. Post 66507360 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 07:30:02 CET 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-03-06_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1772764974 1 178336.msg66455385 2393114 35501
1772764736 1 178336.msg66478141 198573 120694
1772763701 1 178336.msg66478147 120694 64507
1772763446 2 2235093.msg66476891 1166480 1039323
1772763342 2 5452055.msg66475602 1166480 885256
1772762958 1 5559383.msg65816214 997187 2654005
1772762720 1 178336.msg66477157 252510 2755547
1772762680 4 5564839.msg66477070 1166480 1028592
1772762027 1 178336.msg66478141 64507 120694
1772760459 1 5576527.msg66478122 3570710 3558380
1772759283 2 5576474.msg66475449 3322606 1143990
1772758516 3 232519.msg66474236 2746686 3470490
1772758486 2 232519.msg66478051 2746686 3503706
1772758419 1 232519.msg66476503 2746686 3594134
1772758337 1 5574307.msg66477002 1593137 2812492
1772757962 1 5576324.msg66471770 3714097 422859
1772757949 1 5576324.msg66470604 3714097 140584
1772756799 1 5572151.msg66317887 2393114 30747
1772755911 1 5573622.msg66477940 1593137 2850161
1772753841 4 5576086.msg66464904 33156 290195
1772753813 4 5576086.msg66461797 33156 3357194
1772753740 1 5576329.msg66470829 33156 2590147
1772753333 3 5576282.msg66471918 1554927 3578252
1772753176 2 5576315.msg66469977 1554927 846936
1772752658 1 5576474.msg66475449 33156 1143990
1772752560 1 5575870.msg66453441 802441 1980983
1772752457 1 5576102.msg66476822 3559419 3718382
1772752151 2 5575984.msg66467816 1045971 3613415
1772752069 1 178336.msg66477300 33156 64507
1772751732 2 5571678.msg66418241 3548615 3667887
1772751725 1 5376945.msg66477326 252510 3708159
1772751348 2 5575285.msg66434890 3730852 3730997
1772750712 1 5575953.msg66457459 2393114 33156
1772750361 5 5553695.msg65682650 51173 1192397
1772750225 5 5576326.msg66470533 51173 30747
1772749762 10 5575905.msg66455968 51173 289817
1772749650 1 1220979.msg66476947 140584 18321
1772749648 5 1383758.msg66470451 51173 35
1772749606 1 5576404.msg66473214 846936 1031572
1772749406 3 5575049.msg66467861 3711603 2679380
1772748800 1 5576516.msg66477644 557798 846936
1772748645 2 5568567.msg66453410 3730997 3664632
1772748585 1 5576393.msg66473402 846936 983960
1772748025 1 178336.msg66474414 198573 1089623
1772747877 1 178336.msg66473796 198573 252510
1772747779 1 5571375.msg66477575 3687357 1852120
1772747772 1 5571375.msg66477360 3687357 1410401
1772747442 1 301480.msg66477091 1593137 945923
1772747210 5 5571375.msg66463854 1852120 3687357
1772747054 3 5571375.msg66477360 1852120 1410401
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (55 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2770 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:42:54 AM CET,
ESG (
history) sent 1 Merit to
cAPSLOCK (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:38:56 AM CET,
Hueristic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
xhomerx10 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:21:41 AM CET,
xhomerx10 (
history) sent 1 Merit to
philipma1957 (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:17:26 AM CET,
Julien_Olynpic (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Goran_ (
history) for
Re: Последний вагон на север.
On Fri 06 Mar 2026 03:15:42 AM CET,
Julien_Olynpic (
history) sent 2 Merit to
summonerrk (
history) for
Re: Биткойн-оптимизм..
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (581 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8393 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 878 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 5 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3748768:
ghoulMAX (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3748978:
Meggie Leen (
history) earned: 4 Merit.
3749052:
cezar1 (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3749153:
yowbow (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3749597:
Allicedreim123 (
history) earned: 7 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3745203: cephalopod
3745458: goblintester
3745512: Decimetre
3745514: HighwayLost81
3745612: cLoazyL
3745615: viruz06
3745624: rishib
3745871: Lethobios
3745932: jasonstacks
3746105: Dicey12
3746177: wavelife1
3746196: LUSUBY
3746294: tcatm2
3746381: flowingcapital
3746429: Tete130
3746445: MomusReign
3746499: kazikbalaganiarz
3746721: AnisEverRise
3746729: evgpokrow
3746827: rony_btc
3746871: xdxiug
3747125: TraderKnows007
3747215: highpay-ads
3747260: Glum_Climate_5517
3747322: Ngozi26
3747467: Dollartree
3747543: jinx_22
3747640: Mark00101
3747685: oxynaz
3747701: JonasKernDE
3747712: Mr intelligence
3747726: Spicoli
3747820: statumx
3747833: Chifather247
3747903: needsumhelp
3747917: billy.grabow
3747918: btchelp.io
3748112: ranswar
3748386: martschlo
3748434: alkalineph13
3748484: GemUtxo
3748490: luthen
3748579: Der_Gegenwert
3748655: deX001
3748702: Batractoxin
3748768: ghoulMAX
3748978: Meggie Leen
3749052: cezar1
3749153: yowbow
3749597: Allicedreim123
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8393
4:0:878
10:0:1
11:0:5
12:0:1
13:3:76
14:0:11
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:773
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14328:14311
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2483
145:0:1
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:83
203:68:301
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1470
237:0:5
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:1
270:0:52
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:10
.......
.......
.......
3745203:0:3
3745458:1:15
3745512:0:3
3745514:0:11
3745612:0:11
3745615:0:1
3745624:0:14
3745871:0:4
3745932:2:6
3746105:0:1
3746177:0:1
3746196:2:4
3746294:0:10
3746381:0:5
3746429:0:3
3746445:0:2
3746499:0:1
3746721:0:1
3746729:0:2
3746827:0:15
3746871:0:3
3747125:0:73
3747215:0:1
3747260:0:16
3747322:0:1
3747467:0:3
3747543:0:7
3747640:0:2
3747685:0:1
3747701:0:9
3747712:0:1
3747726:0:1
3747820:0:3
3747833:0:2
3747903:0:1
3747917:0:2
3747918:0:1
3748112:0:1
3748386:0:3
3748434:0:1
3748484:0:12
3748490:0:6
3748579:0:2
3748655:0:1
3748702:0:1
3748768:0:1
3748978:0:4
3749052:0:2
3749153:0:1
3749597:0:7
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51060Sample 1. 20319 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1102 unique users in 11726 transactions
2. 20075 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 745 unique users in 11009 transactions
3. 18882 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9982 transactions
4. 15206 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 476 unique users in 8765 transactions
5. 14311 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1222 unique users in 5132 transactions
6. 13050 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 711 unique users in 8704 transactions
7. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
8. 11893 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 580 unique users in 4556 transactions
9. 11600 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 490 unique users in 6434 transactions
10. 11269 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 604 unique users in 6554 transactions
11. 11257 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 653 unique users in 6449 transactions
12. 10946 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 504 unique users in 5705 transactions
13. 10573 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 579 unique users in 6050 transactions
14. 9852 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 329 unique users in 5060 transactions
15. 9613 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 638 unique users in 5206 transactions
16. 9558 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 524 unique users in 4430 transactions
17. 9461 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 335 unique users in 3400 transactions
18. 9429 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 452 unique users in 4717 transactions
19. 9380 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 435 unique users in 5131 transactions
20. 9315 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 539 unique users in 4241 transactions
21. 9262 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 391 unique users in 3280 transactions
22. 8801 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 535 unique users in 4752 transactions
23. 8557 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 453 unique users in 5074 transactions
24. 8520 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4842 transactions
25. 8519 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 568 unique users in 5018 transactions
26. 8458 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 403 unique users in 4397 transactions
27. 8393 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 406 unique users in 897 transactions
28. 7784 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 456 unique users in 4300 transactions
29. 7569 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 490 unique users in 4117 transactions
30. 7311 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 579 unique users in 4352 transactions
31. 7134 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 404 unique users in 3642 transactions
32. 6924 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 229 unique users in 1782 transactions
33. 6657 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 276 unique users in 3013 transactions
34. 6630 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 373 unique users in 3339 transactions
35. 6623 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 387 unique users in 3615 transactions
36. 6590 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 939 unique users in 4263 transactions
37. 6534 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 197 unique users in 3808 transactions
38. 6502 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 482 unique users in 3608 transactions
39. 6304 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 227 unique users in 3628 transactions
40. 6293 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 623 unique users in 3531 transactions
41. 6262 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 418 unique users in 3645 transactions
42. 6220 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 524 unique users in 3626 transactions
43. 6186 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 332 unique users in 2926 transactions
44. 6155 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 220 unique users in 3606 transactions
45. 6123 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 414 unique users in 3354 transactions
46. 6089 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 456 unique users in 3414 transactions
47. 6057 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 195 unique users in 2634 transactions
48. 5920 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 203 unique users in 3414 transactions
49. 5506 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 380 unique users in 2593 transactions
50. 5497 Merit received by zasad@ (#2654005) from 414 unique users in 2689 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51011. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51012. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51013. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51014. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51015. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51016. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51017. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51018. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51019. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51020. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51021. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51022. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51023. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51024. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51025. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51026. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51027. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51028. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51029. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51030. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51031. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51032. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51033. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51034. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51035. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51036. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51037. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51038. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51039. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51040. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51041. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51042. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51043. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51044. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51045. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51046. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51047. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51048. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51049. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51050. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51051. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51052. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51053. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51054. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51055. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51056. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51057. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51058. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51059. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51060. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26571Sample 1. 72146 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 898 unique users in 12632 transactions
2. 67496 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2193 unique users in 29234 transactions
3. 66293 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3320 unique users in 17577 transactions
4. 58556 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3572 unique users in 56355 transactions
5. 57848 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4591 unique users in 33198 transactions
6. 49447 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3660 unique users in 34223 transactions
7. 43485 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2831 unique users in 15350 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38193 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2961 unique users in 30986 transactions
10. 37505 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2511 unique users in 13928 transactions
11. 34115 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1579 unique users in 13802 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 32033 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1469 unique users in 10302 transactions
14. 29922 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2100 unique users in 10546 transactions
15. 28480 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1425 unique users in 7493 transactions
16. 27981 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1683 unique users in 6598 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25819 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1315 unique users in 11613 transactions
19. 22991 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1377 unique users in 9491 transactions
20. 22822 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6439 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 17340 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1715 unique users in 3928 transactions
23. 16099 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 744 unique users in 5947 transactions
24. 16095 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 1968 unique users in 6531 transactions
25. 15739 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1714 unique users in 7310 transactions
26. 15546 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 533 unique users in 7299 transactions
27. 15246 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1170 unique users in 8991 transactions
28. 15188 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5468 transactions
29. 14347 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1292 unique users in 8147 transactions
30. 14328 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1103 unique users in 1752 transactions
31. 13944 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1659 unique users in 7270 transactions
32. 13280 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 660 unique users in 3604 transactions
33. 13140 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 2998 unique users in 7000 transactions
34. 13080 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1334 unique users in 7310 transactions
35. 13076 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1303 unique users in 5844 transactions
36. 12937 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1129 unique users in 7892 transactions
37. 12819 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 823 unique users in 6069 transactions
38. 12767 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 822 unique users in 4206 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11229 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1154 unique users in 6211 transactions
41. 10507 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 543 unique users in 3945 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8230 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1040 unique users in 3577 transactions
45. 8164 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 753 unique users in 7163 transactions
46. 8077 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 328 unique users in 3301 transactions
47. 7942 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 572 unique users in 6930 transactions
48. 7907 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 944 unique users in 3466 transactions
49. 7483 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 508 unique users in 5924 transactions
50. 7126 Merit sent by hosemary (#995810) to 516 unique users in 4038 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26522. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26523. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26524. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26525. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26526. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26527. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26528. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26529. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26530. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26531. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26532. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26533. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26534. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26535. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26536. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26537. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26538. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26539. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26540. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26541. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26542. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26543. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26544. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26545. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26546. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26547. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26548. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26549. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26550. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26551. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26552. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26553. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26554. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26555. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26556. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26557. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26558. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26559. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26560. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26561. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26562. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26563. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26564. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26565. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26566. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26567. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26568. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26569. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26570. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26571. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 326172 (14.36%)
Tuesday 324912 (14.30%)
Wednesday 324978 (14.30%)
Thursday 346238 (15.24%)
Friday 344027 (15.14%)
Saturday 300504 (13.23%)
Sunday 304208 (13.39%)
Total: 2271039
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
17. Post 66505799 (unedited backup) (by criptoevangelista) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 19:47:55 CET 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
Ele ta tentando segurar a inflação
Reduzir impostos no diesel que afeta todos os produtos, e depois botar um imposto que torna quase impeditivo exportar o petroleo. Dai meio que vai sobrar uma producao para vender mais barato aqui dentro.
As maravilhas das intervenções federais na economia

O diesel sempre foi um problema no Brasil e até então nunca teve alguém disposto a resovler de verdade, sem conta o LIXO que é o biodiesel que arrebenta com os carros, aonde já se viu um combustivel que vai resto de gordura de peixe, gordura de animais, um monte de porcaria que dizem ser melhor para o meio ambiente, mas detona com tudo, encarecendo ainda mais os fretes por conta de maior manutenção de motores, bicos e bombas injetoras... cara... o diesel APODRECE em 1 mês, é coisa de maluco, vira uma borra, entope tudo, detona com os motores, e um motor diesel pra você arrumar passa fácil de 40, 50 mil reais! isso de carros pequenos, de caminhoes passa facil disso.. enfim, nossa gasolina é uma bosta, mas o diesel é um negocio bem crítico, de verdade, e ainda querem aumentar essa porcaria de biodiesel pra 30% ...
18. Post 66505271 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 17:16:55 CET 2026) in Onde estavas em 3 de janeiro de 2009?:
Era só vc minerar um bloco entre 2009 e 2010 e você estaria com 50 BTC e você estaria de boa...
A questão é que na época, ter 50BTC não significava ter dinheiro. Antes, que estavas a fazer parte de um projeto e ideologia, que ia mais além do que um aspeto econômico.
Não dava nem pra comprar uma pizza

@Forsyth Jones, vi que voce criou sua conta no forum em 2017. O Btc vale 700 USD nessa epoca
Se voce tivesse comprado 7 mil dólares no dia que abriu a conta no forum (10 BTC), hoje voce teria cerca de 720mil dólares, ou quase 4 milhões de reais
É um cenário mais provável!
Tem vários exemplos de pessoas que ganharam na loteria e rapidamente voltaram a ficar sem nada..
Com o Bitcoin é ainda pior.. é uma loteria em camera lenta, como costumam dizer.. então muita gente vai vendendo conforme sobe um pouco e quando vê já está sem nada.
O cara precisava ter uma excelente educação financeira, seja em 2010 ou 2017, para não vender.. digo excelente porque era difícil acreditar numa moeda descentralizada, muitos economistas estudados desdenharam/não entenderam até hoje o Bitcoin..
O próprio Vitalik vendeu uma porrada de Ethereum a US$ 0,99.. imagina só.
Agora, eu duvido muito de alguém que hoje diz, que em 2011 já achava que isto ia valer milhões. Dizer, isso hoje é fácil, mas na época? Não é visionário, é um salto de fé.
Deve ter alguns malucos como o Hal Finney.. uma pena que ele faleceu cedo e não pode acompanhar a trajetória do BTC.
19. Post 66505162 (unedited backup) (by Pumared) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 16:40:25 CET 2026) in Eleições presidenciais 2026 na Polymarket/Kalshi:
Kalshi fechou parceria com a XP:
XP ta virando uma casa de Bet! Que tempos...

Lula aparece como favorito com 59%, abrindo bastante desde o início de outubro quando estava quase empatado com o Tarcísio.. Parece ter muitos fãs do Renan Santos tanto apostando quanto nos comentários também.
Já está bme menos, com 45%. E o mais inteerssante é que se somar os de direita todos , passa o lula.
Quem diria hein. Será que o Brasil ganha dos comunas nas eleições desse ano?
O povo nem ligou pra isenção dos 5k. É tanto aumento de imposto que nem perceberam kkk
Já começou as medidas populistas para ganhar voto. Atacou logo no principal e que pode dar dor de cabeça que é o Diesel.
Lula zera impostos sobre o diesel e taxará exportação de petróleo. O engraçado é que na fala dele foi dito que seria um sacrifício fazer um corte de imposto.
Lula foi o primeiro a falar e anunciou a redução dos impostos como um “sacrifício enorme”. Segundo ele, essa é a “medida que vai fazer com que nós cortemos impostos sobre a importação para evitarmos o aumento de preços”.
Acredito que logo o Flávio deva passar dele, pois foi muito imposto em tão pouco tempo. E isso ficou muito estampado. Mas não é uma certeza, como sempre o brasileiro tem memoria curta.
20. Post 66504761 (unedited backup) (by arwin100) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 14:49:31 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
Yes, some ask depending on the amount you win, if the money is very huge they'll feel you're trying to launder money with their platforms and request for it, although it's true that some use it as a market strateg, knowing fully well that lots of gamblers would prefer casinos that offers privacy to one's that would require them to expose their important documents online. Just that some gamblers don't read TOS to see where casinos that claim to be KYC free specify that they have the right to change their policy if need be.
This makes no sense. If you win big, there is no money to be launder. You sent a few bucks and you are withdrawing thousands of dollars that you made betting.
Launder money would be a situation where you sent a big amount of dirty money before betting. It would make sense to convert to another coin and withdrawal, or make a few low risk bets and withdrawal another coin, etc. Just to get different coins
Right, since winning big from small amount they bet is not really a case of laundering. That's provably legit withdrawal especially if the money came from their winning, I don't see any disguising and doing such illegal act with that scenario.
Money laundering schemes would only happen if they try place low risk and small bets for a while then immediately withdraw their funds then they try to make it look like those funds they withdraw is clean which came from the casino.
21. Post 66503947 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 09:46:38 CET 2026) in Help me test my SSH app:
Can you explain a little bit more about the use cases? Would be to securely connect to repos to install applications?
Will it work in windows, or android only (looks like a play store screenshot)
I use ssh to login into servers, github, etc. Personally I dont use to install apps
It's just an SSH client. The kind you can download to your phone and connect to servers and then open a terminal. Like Termux.
Yeah, it's Android only.
22. Post 66503508 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 05:26:07 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
That deepest dip in Sortino probably corresponded to Jan 2015 where many people got discouraged at the very end of the bear market.
That was one of the hardest moments for me, being approx. 45% under on a (for me) HUGE investment!!!! Everyone preached to me that I was wrong!!!
Since we are going through war stories, I am going to give some ballpark ideas to suggest that my level of agony was likely worse than your agony during that late 2014 and throughout 2015 timeframe.
My accounting kind of sucks, yet it seems to me that when I started in bitcoin my first few BTC purchases were a wee bit high, including my very first purchase was right around $1,200 per BTC, yet I was paying a premium since it was a peer to peer transaction, yet that was the top of the market so my further purchases through 2014 brought my average cot per BTC down to about $570 by November of 2014 and then I was down to about $550 per BTC average by the beginning of 2015.
So there were various dips that the BTC price went down to right around (or slightly below) $160 in early January (so that would be 70% down for my then holdings), yet I felt that throughout 2015, my average cost per BTC continued to come down and the BTC price dips did not go down as low.. since it seems to me that buy the time we had another test of $200 in around September 2015, my average costs per BTC were approaching $500, so then that would mean that I was only 60% in the hole by that time.
Of course, I had some other issues, that currently contributes to my now wanting to proclaim that my average cost per BTC is around $1k.. I especially started making that claim since about 2017.. . .yet even using $1k per BTC as my then newly estimated average, there weren't any meaningful dips below $1k once we got past April of 2017.
My punchline still is that if you are proclaiming that you ONLY were down around 45%, then your level of down was much less than mine for around that time.
Just the beginning of my plate training, though I also felt maxpain in late 2017 after watching it go from 17,966 to 3k (again, I was told how stoopid I was).
Huh? How could that be pain, relatively speaking?
Earlier you had suggested that you were not selling any of your bitcoin, so you were going through pain based on your going from a higher state of profits (on paper) and then to a lower state of profits (on paper) and based on feeling stupid for not having had sold as your friends, family and perhaps other acquaintances were pointing at you and laughing because you could have had sold out at 40x-ish profits, but instead you were ONLY able to potentially sell in the ballpark of 6x profits..
That period was less painful to me, since I felt at that time that I was still more than 3x profits even at the lowest price points in that timeframe - even though there weren't really a loss of folks calling for $1,500 and even lower prices as if such level of dip "technically" "had to happen," and we later found out that such level of dip did not "have to happen."
Upgraded to titanium via ole Bob-O... Don't get me wrong, the last time, even though it was hard watching it go from 69k back to 17k, somehow it was less hard, as my .63 BTC had grown substantially.
I can relate to the 0.63 BTC - and I am going to say that my amounts were higher prior to 2017... but shit happens.
Remember, the pie-in-the-sky number was 32K; that was the dream.
That was Adam's number.. and yeah, folks were not necessarily on the same page as Adam.. but at the same time, such numbers were not outside of the visions of "where we could go.".. not that anyone was really selling in great quantities on the way up.
Oh, how far we've come!!! 126k down to now has been mind-bending but not a real concern. Could I have followed LFC and made more? Hell yeah, I could have, but I also could have gone all in on the block wars and followed Craig to my demise, fo sho. Do I wish I had more? Yeah, but I am extremely grateful to be in the position I am in now!
Selling is generally not a great route to building more holdings, even though surely when you get a large enough stash, then you should not necessarily hesitate to sell a bit here and there along the way... but yeah, maybe your stash size is one of those "in-between" sizes that is not quite there, yet... not that "we" really need to know particulars, unless you start to brag about how BIG of a BALLER you happen to be. hahahahaha
Also coming to terms with time-based selling rather than price-based selling has also taken the pressure off as I can always not sell, as the bot (Jjg) says.
Yeah, but I do both. I started price-based selling in 2015, and I started experimenting with time based selling in late 2022.
I personally think that price based selling makes more sense to start first. It seems easier to justify for selling first.
Time based selling seems to imply a higher cushion, just to be comfortable with it... yet
even right now, a guy with 15.2 BTC or more should feel sufficiently comfortable that he would be able to sustainably withdraw at $80k per year and to increase his dollar withdrawal amount by 7% per year.
Of course the amount that works for sustainable withdrawal would be higher or lower based on the quantity of BTC...and perhaps the extent to which a person might want to retain a bit of a cushion with his quantity of BTC so that he does not end up withdrawing too much too soon.
But if I am bettering my current life, then it's worth it,
It seems to me that your life should already be better by having had accumulated whatever stash that you have built up, even if you have not started to cash out yet.
as the one thing we can't buy is time, and I bet Bob doesn't regret (much, anyways) building the ranch or Jimbo's lake. One day I hope to be able to rent an Airbnb at both though!!!!
I just wish I could use my time more efficiently and not think about what-ifs; it will definitely drive a man crazy!
K
That's true.
If it wasn't for brash geopolitics and the absolute stupidity of politicians, Bitcoin would be at 100K at least.
I think we would not need btc at all if nationalism and crooked politicians.
That is true.
If people were honest
(ie. not self-interested) (and perhaps like robots?), then we would not need bitcoin.
[edited out]
Yeah pick a number for the end of owning btc say 90years in my case.
So
90-69= 21 sales of my btc.
I think on my 70th birthday I should have 2 coins
So If I begin selling off in 2027
Jan 2027 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2028 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2029 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2030 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2031 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2032 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2033 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2034 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2035 sell 0.1btc
Jan 2036 sell 0.1btc
I will be 80 in 2037 and have a coin left
A simple plan
Even if you get up to 2 BTC by January 2027, then you still have to have 0.0105 BTC available when you turn 105 (that is if you turn 105) and you said that you want to have double that.
I think that you should wait a couple years before you make your first sale... maybe start at the earliest in Jan 2028.
You could also use my sustainable withdrawal tool, and sell 15% of the dollar value of the 200-WMA.
Right now, for 2 BTC, using 15% per year based on the 200WMA valuation, my tool (designed by bitmover) is showing $1,322 per month... I am sure it will be higher in 2027 or even likely to be higher if you were to wait until 2028
23. Post 66502727 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 22:42:32 CET 2026) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
Regarding "depressed", I wouldn't be at 30K or 37-38K, so it is mostly academic.
I would be sad if bitcoin completely vanishes, but it is not in the "cycles" afaik

.
I would likely start to get a bit depressed if we go below $45k, and maybe even getting wee bit depressed earlier than that, even though I would still be in 45x profits (more or less).
I would think that my 45x in profits (if we end up going there?) is likely way better than OgNasty's ability to buy back for 1/2 price or even 1/4 price, even if he were able to achieve such a feat... which is probably in his imagination, alone (absent his inclinations to spin and exaggerate, which he is quite inclined to engage in those behaviors and he even seems to persuade a few gullible folks in regards to his supposed self-proclaimed BIG BALLER status)..
And, gosh, a world without bitcoin, as if it were to go to zero: That would be difficult to imagine. There would be quite a few depressed peeps that would come out of such a development, and surely wondering the implications of such an outrageous outcome were such a thing actually play out or be able to play out.
yet, for sure OgNasty is still smarter than the rest of us dummies who are active in this thread, and even his having had supposedly sold most if not all of his 20 coins in this last price run, may well end up with way less than 20, if he does not end up buying them back. .since besides his lack of humility, he seems to be a bit of a greedy ass fuck too.. hahahahaha.
Why do you pretend you know how much BTC I have?
I have a working theory - that is actually a pretty good one.
Why do you sell 4% of your stack every year?
Within my authorization I could sell up to 10% of the 200-WMA dollar value as long as the BTC price is at least 25% above the 200-WMA.
I don't even sell close to my authorized levels.... which is not really a big deal... especially if we might recognize that overall my holdings are in the ballpark of 70x higher than my costs.. so I could sell various small percentages at any time and it is not really changing my portfolio size by very much..
And, yeah, my profit level (on paper) went from about 126x and down to as low as 60x, and now (as I type) floating around 70x... not really a BIG deal.. at least I have coins rather than being in dollars and having hypothetical coins, which seems to be your current status after selling most, if not all, of your coins.
Even if I might say that in 2017 through 2020, my average cost per coin was in the ballpark of $1k per coin, so if you might recall that the BTC price went up to $19,666 in late 2017, so that would be around 19.6x in profits, and then we had bitcoin corrections that spent quite a bit of time in 2018 through 2020 in the ranges of $3,124 to $10k for much of that time, event hough later, especially starting in late 2020, we largely broke above $20k and stayed above $20k, so maybe the hardest time was at various points between 201 and 2020 to have dips that brought my holdings to get as low as 3.124x in profits.. .. so yeah those were tougher times to ONLY have profits in the 3.124x to 10x territories... as compared to the supposed pain these days of only 60x to 70x profits (on paper) and your prediction that my profit might go into the 30x to 50x territories, which may well be your little fantasy rather than anything that really ends up happening in the real world. Yet you still have the ongoing dilemma (based on lack of fulfillment) regarding when and how to buy back..
Why don’t you do ANYTHING to support Bitcoin?
You seem to be arguing from a position of desperation, to the extent that any guys (including yours truly) have any obligation to do anything for bitcoin.
You have shot yourself in the foot by failing refusing to hold bitcoin, while you are trying to put yourself out there as a bitcoin expert and even a trading expert, yet even in your last trade, you have turned yourself into a low coiner or perhaps a no coiner and you are bragging about it, as if that kinds of an approach to bitcoin were a good idea.
You are free to do whatever you like, yet when you are bragging about being smarter than everyone else, then that seems both incorrect but also contrary to your own facts of selling way too much coins too soon in 2017, yet you want to proclaim that dumbass mistake does not count... like you did not know any better or that you did not know about cycles and blah blah blah, even though claiming yourself to be an expert. Those are not even my words. You are the one who said that you were an expert.
You are a leech. A flea dangling from the nuts of Bitcoiners like myself. Clinging for dear life in the hopes you can sell Bitcoin like a market parasite the rest of your life to support yourself. You are pathetic and a negative addition to Bitcoin. You should honestly be ashamed to post here.
I have bitcoin and you don't, even though you claim to have been profited by selling most if not all of yours.
I doubt that guys are concerned that guys are selling some of their bitcoin from time to time, especially if the guys have reached overaccumulation status - to the extent that you could even imagine what overaccumulation status is.
Sure, your goals might be greater than being able to have a mostly passive income from bitcoin, yet if you were to have
20 bitcoin right now, then you could still withdraw right around $8,800 per month (or $105k) per year (and with an ability to increase your dollar withdrawal rate by 7% per year forever and ever), so sure maybe you have a goal to have more bitcoin before you start to withdraw from your bitcoin - to the extent that you even understand how to deploy such a practice.
For sure, there is a considerable amount of latitude in terms of how guys might choose to manage their bitcoin holdings once they have reached a status that the consider to be enough or more than enough bitcoin.
In one of your earlier posts, you seemed to be having a dilemma whether you would be buying back your bitcoin or perhaps getting into some other kind of a potential investment with whatever proceeds that you might have from the bitcoin that you supposedly sold.
Sure, perhaps you are the more true bitcoiner who is just considering his options... Right? I doubt that any of us is really proclaiming that there is ONLY one way to be a bitcoiner, yet it seems like when claiming to be a good bitcoiner, it would help to have some bitcoin.
24. Post 66502009 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 19:32:19 CET 2026) in [ANN] bitcoindata.science:
But, as i have seen many websites using cloudflare stats, I think they are OK to use and share too
Cloudflare's stats may not really be entirely certain. But, usually it's not for less, it's for more
Therefore, this data is more than enough to get an idea of the movement you feel on the site.
There is no problem using them as a reference, and they are totally valid.
Therefore, he is to be congratulated for the success of the website/project.
25. Post 66499800 (unedited backup) (by Franklyn-wood) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 06:14:49 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
KYC is just a process and not measurement on how reliable the casino. New casinos can actually ask this requirements that's why they should not make it as basis to believe immediately that those casino do this is automatically a trusted platform.
I agree. Certainly there are many reliable casinos that perform KYC.
Kyc becomes a problem when the casino just freezes your funds , basically taking them hostage and asks for endless kyc and personal documents , which are very sensitive information
Yeah that's the part where I have a problem with when they won't tell you of kyc from the start and all of a sudden freeze your account and start asking for kyc especially like you said endless kyc, I mean it's very annoying what if you have some serious funds in this casino and would probably want to perform certain transactions you wouldn't be able to that because of some unnecessary endless kyc.
Well having known that this kind of occurrence will come into action for casinos with no KYC, it will be safer for each gambler who is security conscious to have all the possible information required for KYC available with him or her to avoid being locked up at the point of celebrating and withdrawing wining, because this is what usually ends happening to gamblers who sees no kyc as a quick and easy way to quickly get back what ever interested they are expecting from the site without any interference and later victims of blocked account, inability to withdraw or send funds into accounts and more as the case maybe.
26. Post 66499306 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 00:08:01 CET 2026) in Onde estavas em 3 de janeiro de 2009?:
Bem, eu não lembro ao certo o que eu estava fazendo, mas eu provavelmente estava de férias da escola, jogando PS2 um god of war, GTA 'sandera' ou no PC (meu primeiro computador era daqueles de monitor de tubo que pesava 1 tonelada).
Época muito boa, eu lembro daquela época em que a estética era outra, os designs dos sites, aplicativos era na forma chapada, cheio de entornos, o sistema muito usado ainda era o Windows XP e o Windows 7 era novidade... saudades do frutiger aero, aquela vibe futurista e super nostálgica... naquela época os forums (como esse) eram muito populares e eu sempre estava vasculhando em fóruns vasculhando tutoriais de games..
Pergunta interessante, eu nunca havia pensado nisso. Sempre pensava em dataas como 2013 ou 2015 quadno eu ouvi falar de bitcoin a primeira vez e não me interessei o suficiente pra comprar...
Em 3 de janeiro de 2009 eu estava "de férias" na Bahia, pensando que eu precisava arrumar um emprego e era já formado há um ano e não trabalhava ainda

Era só vc minerar um bloco entre 2009 e 2010 e você estaria com 50 BTC e você estaria de boa...
27. Post 66499218 (unedited backup) (by sabotag3x) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 23:41:50 CET 2026) in CZ agora é mais rico que Bill Gates, segundo a Forbes:
É incrível essa falta de transparência que existe no mundo cripto (o que é positivo e negativo ao mesmo tempo). CZ deve ter bilhões em ativos que ninguém sabe. Altcoins, stablecoins, bitcoin, etc, em dezenas ou até centenas de carteiras.
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill gates, etc tem o dinheiro deles em ações das empresas que eles fundaram. Além de transparência, o dinheiro deles está "skin in the game", nas empresas que eles comandam ou comandaram.
Neste caso a Forbes diz que a fortuna dele está ligada a própria Binance mesmo.. diz que a empresa vale US$ 100 bilhões e ele tem 90% dela (então US$ 90 bilhões).. mas como é privada, chutam qualquer valor.
Bitcoin eles dizem que o CZ tem só 1.400 moedas (US$ 99 milhões)..
No passado o próprio CZ disse que só tinha Bitcoin (1,32%) e BNB (98,48%).. então fazendo uma regra de 3, ele teria uns US$ 7,4 bilhões em BNB (ou US$ 10 bilhões já que o BNB subiu uns 36,5% contra o BTC desde então).
Os outros US$ 11 bilhões, não sei de onde tiraram

talvez da YZi Labs (antiga Binance Labs) e outras empresas menores dele.
Outro nome que vale a pena acompanhar é do Giancarlo Devasini, na 22ª posição com US$ 89,3 bilhões.. é o dono da Tether

28. Post 66498653 (unedited backup) (by Cricktor) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 20:58:37 CET 2026) in 2.62x BTC dumped to legacy address of Genesis block:
While it took more than a month to trigger a new sufficiently high entry, there was quite some dust spamming and some larger "donations" which just didn't surpass my arbitrary threshold.
Past March 14
th, 2025 large
equal/over 500k sats transfers to Genesis block descriptor:
Current balance at time of this post according to
combo(PubKey of Genesis block's coinbase) descriptor, including the unspendable 50
BTC of coinbase tx: 107.15905497
BTC (includes 1,638sat pending confirmation, the difference (0.05909203
BTC) to previous post's value and newcomer transaction are smaller dust wastes and often a few larger ones that just don't make it into the table).
This may differ slightly from what mempool.space or bitcoindata.science displays because the combo() descriptorsee below accounts for all address types (except Taproot, IIRC).combo(04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)#gvgcz9wt
29. Post 66498298 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 19:27:13 CET 2026) in CZ agora é mais rico que Bill Gates, segundo a Forbes:
É incrível essa falta de transparência que existe no mundo cripto (o que é positivo e negativo ao mesmo tempo). CZ deve ter bilhões em ativos que ninguém sabe. Altcoins, stablecoins, bitcoin, etc, em dezenas ou até centenas de carteiras.
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill gates, etc tem o dinheiro deles em ações das empresas que eles fundaram. Além de transparência, o dinheiro deles está "skin in the game", nas empresas que eles comandam ou comandaram.
O mesmo vale para esses magnatas das tecnologias.
Porque com toda a certeza eles terão a nível pessoal, uns bons milhares em BTC (principalmente).
Agora, de facto será sempre difícil ter uma real noção do dinheiro que o CZ, e equivalentes, tem. Todos os valores são meramente estimativas, salvo o valor das suas empresas, no mercado.
30. Post 66497847 (unedited backup) (by knuckey) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 17:16:01 CET 2026) in First goal prediction and winner ($15 rewards):
list of participants
Bobcrypto 31
Celsius 28
Economix 33
Leahized 37
Report 13
Btclover2025 25
Bommanbs 25
furious7 26
bitbit97 55
Pastaral 88
bitmover 23
Mr. Allcrypto 22
AIRWAYS 35
Caicedo 17
MarianRejewski 44
Gposas 19
rdluffy 46
Basedjack 42
Blowon 27
rachael9385 18
kai 11
Red_hamba 48
Highpressure 33
erus 52
Elvis 25
Altsfanatic 28
BlockLens 8
Azharul 22
MusaPk 15
Donneski 16
odunybiz 27
Pumared 15
Yoona_As 23
CONVOAI 10
vanesha 37
malcovi2 18
Dr.Osh 50
Faizan Zen 32
tvplus006 19
Taricoins 49
Ignore 7
Porfirii 55
Dip69 5
Barcode_ 21
bitzizzix 27
johnsaributua 19
cumakoff 12
31. Post 66497173 (unedited backup) (by Zoomic) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 13:29:50 CET 2026) in Are Wrench attacks the result of adoption?:
I agree. I was always very careful in social networks, avoiding even to follow crypto websites with my personal account.
Nowadays I am a bit more relaxed, as crypto is more popular and common, but I am still very reserved about my crypto investments.
People talk too much online about crypto or in real life. Those are the first targets.
My mind has never crossed not following crypto websites on social media. I know that such groups and pages are always target for attack. I follow those pages for information, but many atimes they dish out wrong information. But no matter how wrong the information are, I would never comment on the post. I'm always silent and mute
Social media networks are potentially very harmful for us in psychology and mental health, not only with our account security and fund safety. It's easily to open social media applications, accounts and get attracted by many status, posts, tweets, short videos, reels and all of them possibly consume a lot of time from us. Over using social media platforms will make our psychological and mental health worse, even weaken our physical health too by lack of enough physical activities and exercises.
I am also surprised why people are yet to understand how algorithm has dealt with us. Social media is so terrible that the algorithm decides what you read and it might decided to be wicked at you and be showing you one pattern of post that will gradually influnce your brain.
32. Post 66496898 (unedited backup) (by Gentle_Soul) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 11:42:55 CET 2026) in No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses :
KYC is just a process and not measurement on how reliable the casino. New casinos can actually ask this requirements that's why they should not make it as basis to believe immediately that those casino do this is automatically a trusted platform.
I agree. Certainly there are many reliable casinos that perform KYC.
Kyc becomes a problem when the casino just freezes your funds , basically taking them hostage and asks for endless kyc and personal documents , which are very sensitive information
Yeah that's the part where I have a problem with when they won't tell you of kyc from the start and all of a sudden freeze your account and start asking for kyc especially like you said endless kyc, I mean it's very annoying what if you have some serious funds in this casino and would probably want to perform certain transactions you wouldn't be able to that because of some unnecessary endless kyc.
33. Post 66496027 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Wed Mar 11 02:30:25 CET 2026) in Are Wrench attacks the result of adoption?:
I agree. I was always very careful in social networks, avoiding even to follow crypto websites with my personal account.
Nowadays I am a bit more relaxed, as crypto is more popular and common, but I am still very reserved about my crypto investments.
People talk too much online about crypto or in real life. Those are the first targets.
Social media networks are potentially very harmful for us in psychology and mental health, not only with our account security and fund safety. It's easily to open social media applications, accounts and get attracted by many status, posts, tweets, short videos, reels and all of them possibly consume a lot of time from us. Over using social media platforms will make our psychological and mental health worse, even weaken our physical health too by lack of enough physical activities and exercises.
With people who are in Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, it's quite right like you said, social media can bring potential security exploitation and data breaches.
The cryptocurrency scambook with many scam types including phishing scams with fake accounts on social media.
34. Post 66495252 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 21:15:02 CET 2026) in Are Wrench attacks the result of adoption?:
This $5 wrench attack doesn't need you to be a big hodler, hence you are identified as a bitcoiner or a crypto someone, they already assume that you are filty rich, even if your portfolio is $100
Most of them sees “Mike S.” Whenever they learn you are into crypto

..while you’re busy dealing with the mental stress from market ups and down

.
Nowadays I am a bit more relaxed, as crypto is more popular and common, but I am still very reserved about my crypto investments.
People talk too much online about crypto or in real life. Those are the first targets.
I don’t even talk about it, I’m just a regular dude with my personal account, comments are mostly cute, Nice , good pov

.. There are sometimes I would love too engage in some discussion but your comments also give a sense of how well you are into it and of course could make you a target.
35. Post 66493123 (unedited backup) (by betswift) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 09:59:43 CET 2026) in On Ray Dalio's there can only be 1 gold, bitcoin vs. gold:
@bitmover. Agreed! This is what I am arguing. The future children today who will grow up on year 2050 will see bitcoin or gold and it will only be something similar for them. They will be ordinary, mainstream investments. Bitcoin might also be less volatile because of increased available liquidity.
Totally believe in the volatility part. If things will go where they are headed now, it will be a bigger cap -> bigger demand to push it around, meaning volatility will be less of a factor..