الرابط اللي جبته وضح كتير الصورة صراحة، شكرا عليه.

بس خلاني افكر بنقطة، اذا كانت المنصة نفسها محجوزة عند السلطات وكل البيانات موجودة عندهم، ليش محتاجين اصلا اثبات ملكية اضافي من المستخدم؟ يعني لو سجلات المنصة نفسها فيها اسم صاحب كل محفظة او بريده الالكتروني وقت التسجيل، هذا كافي نظريا، الا اذا كانت هذي البيانات غير موثوقة او ناقصة من الاساس بسبب قدمها.

وبخصوص البائعين اللي حطوا بيتكوين من محافظهم مباشرة، فعلا وضعهم اصعب بكثير، لان اثبات انك انت صاحب عنوان معين على البلوكتشين من سنة 2012 شبه مستحيل الا اذا كنت حافظ على مفاتيحك الخاصة القديمة وين ما كانت.

August's Statistics Data for TalkImg is made available by joker_josue.

So this should be in the attention of DS, GazetaBitcoin, Porfirii, Peanutswar, cygan, mindrust, dansus021, mindrust, zasad@, Kavelj22, JunaidAzizi, Chilwell, M47AK16 and ovcijisir.

Guys, please update your corresponding local translations with newer data.  

 
 Statistics  August 2026____________________
In the latest statistics update, it was possible to notice an unusually low number of views for the most viewed images. It should be noted that, since Cloudflare is used, any changes to the server may cause a difference in how traffic reaches the site. That's what happened; I had made some adjustments that resulted in the information reaching the server being more limited. Faced with this situation, I went back to review the settings and try to understand how I could improve them in order to obtain a result closer to reality.

As you know, TalkImg was designed for Bitcointalk, so traffic via the forum's image proxy has priority on the server without restrictions. Although it is not creating major barriers to its use in other locations, the priority is forum. With that in mind, I managed to make some adjustments to the settings to further improve access to the forum. This allowed us to improve the statistics on forum access to TalkImg.

Therefore, this month we will see very different numbers than what we have seen over the past few months. Still, we'll only know for sure if the numbers are being entered correctly in a month or two, to validate whether they make sense or not. But, at first glance, it seems so.

I would also like to take this opportunity to explain again how this image ranking works. The statistics system analyzes all the queries that the forum's image proxy performs. It checks the number of times an image link is requested. To ensure that all images have the same exposure time, it checks the images uploaded in the previous month. In other words, for example this month, we'll look at the most viewed images in August that were uploaded in July.

One final note: we remind you that TalkImg is a platform where NSFW images, illegal content, or content that promotes illegal activities are prohibited.


Here are the numbers for the month:

	Number of uploads in the month:  7 982 (+181 that in the last month)
	Total disk space in the month:  3.11GB (-0.02 that in the last month)
	Number of visits to the talkimg.com website in the month: 1 823 008*  Estimated number of times images were viewed on the forum in the month (hits): 5 898 861*  Bandwidth in the month: 882.31GB* *This data may not represent total/real numbers, because of Cloudflare.

Top 10 Images Viewed
The 10 images viewed (estimated) this month, which were uploaded in the previous month.

#01 1795 views

#02 1782 views

#03 1346 views

#04 1345 views

#05 1345 views

#06 1344 views

#07 1344 views

#08 1344 views

#09 1341 views

#10 1337 views

من فهمي للخبر الاصلي، اغلب الظن يقصدون كشف حساب بنكي يوضح انه حول فلوس لحساب المنصة بنفس التاريخ اللي تم فيه شراء البيتكوين، يعني اثبات تدفق الفلوس مش توثيق الهوية وقت التسجيل.

نقطة السابقة القانونية اللي ذكرتها معك فيها كتير، بس شخصيا اشوف الموضوع مرتبط بمين استلم القضية اكثر من الدولة نفسها، يعني لو شركة محاماة خاصة زي هذي عندها الادوات وقررت تاخذ القضية بمبادرتها هي، ما تحتاج بالضرورة غطاء من هيئة رقابية معينة عشان تفتح ملفات مشابهة، بس طبعا محدودية وصولها لبيانات المنصات المقفلة او خارج ولايتها القضائية تبقى عائق حقيقي زي ما قلت.

فعلا كنت سأسأل نفس السؤال لأنه أول شيء لفت انتباهي عند قراءة الموضوع؟
التفسير الوحيد أخي كما ذكرت أنه قام بشراء البيتكوين من حسابه البنكي عن طريق المنصة وبالتالي ستكون سجل المعاملات البنكية وسجل البلوكتشاين أيضا لايزال موجود وبالتالي يمكن إثبات الشراء والإيداع
لكن ماذا عن الأشخاص الذين قاموا بإيداع البيتكوين مباشرة من محفظتهم إلى المنصة؟

القصة طريفة وغريبة في نفس الوقت يعني كيف بقيت هذه المحفظة التي تحوي 5500 بيتكوين كل هذه السنين دون أن يمسها أحد خاصة أن الشركة أفلست وأغلقت؟ يعني لماذا لم يبيعوا البيتكوين وقتها؟ هل كانت المحفظة منسية أو مفاتيحها مفقودة وتم استعادتها لاحقا؟

Fair point, and I actually agree with it, so I just went and extended it. The domain's now registered through August 2030, not a single year. Whois should reflect it shortly once it updates.

Honestly it was just me moving fast at launch, not some exit plan, but you're right that a one-year reg sends the wrong signal. Fixed now. Appreciate you flagging it, that's the kind of feedback that actually makes this thread worth having.

As I wrote in the post above yours, all companies registered in Costa Rica can be confirmed on the official Costa Rican National Registry website (Registro Nacional de Costa Rica): https://www.rnpdigital.com/
The company registered under number 3-102-969810 exists:



The above information is available for free. Detailed information, including physical address, must be purchased for a small fee on the same website.

I think there is a concern here. A gambling project ought to be particularly cautious in advancement because employing created or poor quality records can cause individuals to question the legitimacy of the entire project. If there's a project with a good signature campaign already in place. There's no need to have a few in active or suspicious accounts to drive up discussion. This would be much more believable if people who actually used the product had their experience shared. And had a natural voice from the established members. However I also believe it's important to differentiate between criticizing the practice of having casino's in general and accusing this casino without proof. If there is no proof that POWER.If WIN is actually using shillers it is better to make the discussion about the method of promotion. Not assume anything or assume that they do not use shillers.

True, I find any gambling project using shillers to promote their casinos to be weird. I'm not saying this casino is into something like that, but I can't imagine, after paying Hero rank and above a fair budget to wear their signatures, any need for bot accounts to start promoting the same project. Using poor and inactive accounts to shill a project only makes the project look less attractive and might harm the reputation of the project.

لا اخي انا ما قصدت اني موافق على هالشي او اشوفه مقبول اخلاقيا، انا بس كنت اوصف الواقع الموجود مو رايي الشخصي فيه، من ناحيتي انا برضو اشوفه تجارة وهم وما فيها اي قيمة حقيقية.

بس فكرتك عن حياد الشبكة هذي فعلا فتحت عيني على زاوية ما كنت منتبه لها، صح شبكة تاخذ رسوم بغض النظر عن محتوى المعاملة زي ما قلت، بس بحس المسؤولية الاخلاقية موجودة ولو بشكل غير مباشر، يعني لو شبكة معينة صارت معروفة انها البيت الرئيسي للاحتيال، برايي القائمين عليها لازم يفكروا بادوات حماية اقل ولو بسيطة، حتى لو ما كانوا مسؤولين قانونيا عن كل مشروع يطلع عليها.

Just an input since I discussed about this on some of my client before after a guy approached him for this kind of services.

Some of this user are selling shilling services to casino that doesn’t know how the trust system works on the forum which means even a red tag account can be look as someone promoting normally.

Good thing that this shill post is easy to distinguish so it’s totally useless to all members that viewing it.

They can buy accounts at high ranks or they can buy merit to rank up, and use such accounts for spamming and shilling but it does not lead to long term safety for their accounts.

Bought accounts can be known, reported, investigated, and banned or locked for security reasons.
Farmed accounts can be known from merit transaction histories and will be red tagged.
Accounts with spamming posts will become useless if they are no longer allowed to wear avatars and signatures with the latest policy of signature bans. With ban periods like 2 years, it will turn such spam accounts to useless.

سؤالك بصراحة يلخص المشكلة كلها، وانا اميل للاحتمال الثاني بصراحة، بس اللي يلفت نظري اكثر مو الميم كوينز نفسها، هي البنية التحتية اللي بنيت عليها، يعني تطبيق زي Pons ممكن يفضل موجود ويربح رسوم حتى لو كل الرموز اللي طلعت عليه انطفت وماتت، لان دخله من عمولة كل عملية مو من قيمة الرمز نفسه.

فممكن تكون الفقاعة نفسها فعلا مصيرها الانفجار زي ما قلت، لكن الي بناها ومستفيد من كل ضجة تصير عليها هذا شغال بمعزل تام عن نجاح او فشل اي رمز محدد.

I agree that it's better to be open about KYC than to apply the No KYC label and leave it in the Terms in a dark place. It's best for players to know what the real policy is before they put money in or play rather than when they want to take money out. I also believe that Power.win took the criticism rightfully. It's better to admit the wording is wrong and correct it.It is better to be wrong than to have to defend something that could lead users astray. Trust takes time to build. And the true measure will be what they actually do with the policies they say in real terms when they are faced with the real players and when they're faced with the real withdrawals. As long as they have that much openness. It can certainly help them build their reputation in the forum.

I agree that it's better to be open about KYC than to apply the No KYC label and leave it in the Terms in a dark place. It's best for players to know what the real policy is before they put money in or play rather than when they want to take money out. I also believe that Power.win took the criticism rightfully. It's better to admit the wording is wrong and correct it.It is better to be wrong than to have to defend something that could lead users astray. Trust takes time to build. And the true measure will be what they actually do with the policies they say in real terms when they are faced with the real players and when they're faced with the real withdrawals. As long as they have that much openness. It can certainly help them build their reputation in the forum.

I love the fact that they are obviously listening to the community and correcting their mistakes to reflect what is obtainable in their platform. I think this is the first casino that is boldly stating it in clear terms their stand on KYC which is good. I know that Rainbet and Duelbits also do not enforce KYC for their players although they can ask for it if they feel it is necessary and this is exactly captured in their TOS. That is how I know a casino that cherishes their integrity. I hope that Power.win follow their footsteps to become one of the biggest casino in the forum.

No point of doing it because our local topic wasn't very active since beginning and with our population there is no potential that it can become more active. From what I see our people prefer to discuss crypto stuff on Telegram, Discord or Facebook groups.
And yes, there is some CEX's operating in our country, so, you can avoid cross-boarder transfers.
I would say that my country is quite crypto friendly, but not when it comes to banks.

Nope, don't always trust information that you found on internet - we use Euro since 2015, not 2025.

هذا الكلام دقيق كتير، انا كمان بشوف ان القرارات السياسية الامريكية بحد ذاتها فئة مختلفة تماما عن الاحداث الجيوسياسية العادية، لان قرار زي رفع فائدة او تغيير بقوانين الضرائب على الكريبتو بيأثر مباشرة على تدفقات السيولة نفسها اللي احنا حاكين عنها، مو مجرد خبر عابر.


هون بختلف معك شوي، انا بشوف انه ممكن يكون "ملاذ" بمعنى مختلف عن الذهب مو بنفس التعريف بالضبط، يعني بدل ما نحاول نلبسه تعريف الذهب الكلاسيكي، ممكن نشوفه كملاذ ضد تراجع قيمة العملات الورقية على المدى الطويل، حتى لو كانت تقلباته اليومية اعلى بكثير.

احتمال استعمال اموال دافعي الضرائب لشراء البيتكوين و تحقيق فكرة ترامب في انشاء احتياطي بمليون قطعة بيتكوين غير وارد تماما.

First of all, thanks everyone for all the feedback. We are reading everything being posted here, and I want to answer the different points properly instead of leaving questions unanswered.

@tyraxx – $1,100 Withdrawal Update

Just to give a final update here:

Your first $1,900 withdrawal was processed extremely quickly and reached you within around 5–10 minutes.

Your following $1,100 withdrawal was then temporarily placed under review because the team needed to complete an additional check on the gameplay connected to the bonus.

We completely understand why that may have seemed strange considering the first $1,900 withdrawal had already been processed successfully.

The good news is that the review has now been completed and the additional $1,100 withdrawal has also been processed successfully. ✅

So both withdrawals have now been handled from our side.

Thanks again for your patience while the second withdrawal was being reviewed, and we appreciate you sharing your experience with the community. 🙏🐵

@Cointxz – iOS / Tablet Menu Issue

Thank you for coming back with the additional information.

Since you're experiencing the exact same problem on Safari, Chrome and Brave on iOS, while other members have confirmed that the menu works correctly on iPhone, Android and desktop, this looks much more likely to be related to the tablet/iOS layout rather than one specific browser.

The fact that you can see the "Collapse left menu" tooltip but cannot actually activate it is especially useful information.

We have reported this so the team can reproduce the tablet resolution/layout specifically. You definitely shouldn't have to zoom the entire website out just to use it properly.

We will get this looked into. 👍

Regarding the Blank Bonus Page

This has also been noted.

If you're clicking the Bonus section and receiving a completely blank page, that's obviously not intended. We're adding this to the issues being checked.

If anyone else experiences the same thing, please mention your device and browser as well. The more examples we have, the easier it is for our team to reproduce the exact problem and fix it.

@AHOYBRAUSE / wawaweewa – Old Balance + VIP Migration

Yes, we're aware that there are still some individual accounts where everything from the old platform hasn't been reflected correctly yet.

Your old balance and, more importantly, your VIP progress should not simply disappear because of the migration.

We're checking these remaining accounts individually. We already transferred the main account data during the migration, but some balances and VIP information still require correction on our side.

And yes, even the legendary 0.10 balance counts. 😂

Regarding Nick not answering since Friday, apologies for that as well. The last few days surrounding the migration have been extremely busy, but that's not an excuse to leave you wondering what is happening.

We'll make sure the remaining migration cases are handled.

DEPOSIT $100 & GET $30 – OFFICIAL WAGERING CLARIFICATION

Let me officially confirm this because a few members have asked and I don't want people having to guess the rules.

Deposit requirement: $100 USD equivalent

Deposit wagering: 1x the deposited amount

The $30 reward itself: No additional wagering requirement

So, for example:

Deposit $100 → wager the required 1x on the $100 deposit → the additional $30 promotional reward does NOT have another wagering requirement attached to it.

Some members already contacted support and received the same answer, but this is the official clarification here in the thread as well. 👍

Which Cryptocurrencies Qualify?

You do NOT have to use USDT.

BTC or any other supported cryptocurrency can be used as long as the deposit meets the required $100 USD equivalent.

Because cryptocurrency prices fluctuate, if you're depositing something like BTC, we recommend depositing slightly above exactly $100 equivalent so a small price movement doesn't leave the received value below the promotion requirement.

@goodpunt – BTC Deposit Error

Thanks for the screenshot.

BTC absolutely qualifies for the promotion, so the error you're receiving when trying to make the BTC deposit is not because BTC is excluded from the promotion.

This appears to be a technical issue with the deposit/cashier side and we're checking it.

Please don't send funds anywhere unless the deposit address/invoice has been generated correctly.

You did the right thing by waiting rather than trying to send anything manually. 👍

@Kavelj22 – Deposit Address Issue & Marketing Suggestion

You actually make a fair point here.

Telling an existing community member "contact support if the deposit address doesn't appear" is one thing. But you're right that a completely new player might simply leave the website instead.

A deposit address failing to appear is therefore something we take seriously. The cashier/deposit flow needs to work without a player needing support to complete a normal deposit.

Regarding your suggestion to pause the signature campaign or temporarily turn it into a review campaign while everything is being polished: we understand the reasoning behind it.

At the same time, we don't want to hide the fact that we're actively developing and improving the new platform.

This was a major migration to an entirely new platform, and while the core migration is complete, there are clearly smaller UI, account, cashier and device-specific issues that we're still finding and fixing.

We're actually very grateful that the BitcoinTalk community is finding these things.

We'd rather have people report them publicly, acknowledge them, fix them and continue improving than pretend everything is perfect.

That doesn't mean we're satisfied with bugs being present. We're not.

Our team is currently going through reported issues one by one, including:

• iOS/tablet responsive layout
• Left-menu collapse issue
• Blank Bonus page
• BTC/deposit-address generation
• Remaining old balance migrations
• Remaining VIP progress migrations
• General UI/UX improvements

Please keep reporting anything else you find — even small visual problems.

Some of the most useful reports we've received from this community have been things that might initially seem small. Fixing all of those details is part of getting the new platform exactly where we want it.

IMPORTANT – CLEAR YOUR CACHE AFTER THE MIGRATION

One final reminder:

If you're still seeing an old version of SCORAS, strange redirects, outdated pages, or something that another member says is already working correctly, please:

Clear your browser cache/history and reload SCORAS.io.

We've had cases where cached data from the previous platform continued showing users outdated parts of the website after the migration.

If clearing your cache doesn't solve the problem, please report it here or contact support and include your device, operating system, browser and a screenshot whenever possible.

THANK YOU BITCOINTALK ❤️

Thanks again to everyone testing the platform, reporting bugs, giving suggestions and challenging us when something isn't clear.

We're not going anywhere.

The migration was a huge step for SCORAS, but it isn't the finish line. We're going to keep fixing things, adding features and improving the platform together with the community.

Keep the feedback coming. 🐵🍌

SCORAS.io

صحيح كلامك بخصوص الخصوصية، بس بشوف الموضوع مو بس عن رصد وصولها لمنصة، حتى لو ما وصلت لمنصة معروفة ممكن تكون انتقلت لسوق OTC وهذا برضو بيأثر على العرض بطريقة غير مباشرة لان في مشتري حقيقي استلم الكمية هاي، بس صعب نشوفه بنفس وضوح تحويلة لمنصة تداول عادية.


نقطة ممتازة صراحة ما كنت منتبه لها، لو كان الهدف امني بحت كان المفروض ينقلوا كل المحفظة دفعة وحدة مو يجربوا بمبالغ صغيرة، هذا فعلا يخلي احتمال البيع او التجربة اقوى من احتمال الحماية من الاختراقات.

كلامك منطقي كتير وخلاني افكر بالموضوع من زاوية تانية، بس بحس في نقطة مهمة ما نتطرقلها وهي ان تدفقات صناديق الاستثمار المتداولة صارت اليوم لاعب اساسي بتحديد رد فعل السعر اكثر من أي وقت مضى، يعني حتى لو صار حدث جيوسياسي كبير، اذا المؤسسات مستمرة بالشراء عن طريق هالصناديق فراح يمتص أي بيع خوفي من المتداولين الافراد وبالتالي السعر ما بيتحرك كتير مهما كانت الاخبار مخيفة.

فأنا اميل اكثر لفكرة انه مو بالضرورة تغير بطبيعة البيتكوين نفسه، بقد ما هو تغير بهيكلية من يملك ويحرك السوق حاليا، صار فيه لاعبين كبار بمراكز طويلة المدى ما بيتأثروا بأخبار يومية زي ما كان يصير قبل سنتين او ثلاثة لما كان اغلب الحجم للمتداولين الافراد.