نعم أخي كلامك صحيح حتى أنه قانون GENIUS الأمريكي الخاص بتنظيم العملاتالمستقرة يرفض احتساب الذهب والبيتكوين ضمن الأصول المقبولة كغطاء قانوني مباشر للعملة لأن الحكومة الأمريكية يريدون  حصر الاحتياطيات في النقد، وأرصدة الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، وأذون الخزانة قصيرة الأجل وطبعا هذا كله في سبيل دعم الدولار

معك حق أخي ، على حسب معلوماتي شركة تيثر لم تتوقف طيلة العام الماضي عن صك عملات USDT جديدة وكانت تصدر في كل مرة مليار عملة دون أن يقدم إثباتات بوجود احتياطات حقيقية نقدية أو من سندات الخزينة ووفقاً للتقرير السنوي والبيانات المالية الصادرة عن شركة Tether لعام 2025، قامت الشركة بصك وإصدار ما يقرب من 50 مليار دولار من عملة USDT الجديدة خلال العام الماضي وحده.

نعم أخي تيثر لديها احتياطات من الذهب وهو ما يعتبر غير مقبول وفقا لقانون جينسوس المنظم للعملات المستقرة في الولايات المتحدة

أما بالنسبة لشركة KPMG في الولايات المتحدة (KPMG U.S. أو KPMG LLP) هي واحدة من كبرى شركات المحاسبة والتدقيق المالي المعترف بها رسميًا من قبل حكومة الولايات المتحدة والجهات التنظيمية الفيدرالية وتُصنّف الشركة كواحدة من شركات المحاسبة الأربع الكبرى عالميًا إلى جانب كل من (Deloitte، وPwC، وEY). وتخضع لرقابة مباشرة من "مجلس مراقبة محاسبة الشركات العامة" (PCAOB) التابع لهيئة الأوراق المالية والبورصات الأمريكية (SEC)

Perhaps they can only share if two casinos have the same entity behind or the same owner. Otherwise, I do not think that it's like land base casinos wherein there is one gaming commission that overlook everything so they have the data that can be shared along.

As for arbitrage, I don't know if this is still a thing in online casinos. I thought that it had died down because in order to take advantage of it, you need to be very quick in checking the odds as it changes very fast. Online casinos right now are far more advance unlike before, they can see what you are doing as you can give up some signs like the pattern of your betting, and everything goes under your behavioral fingerprinting.

I think the person who said that leagues can be a bit confusing is an interesting comment and when people begin betting for the fun of it, it can be a problem. It's far from a bad idea to get the odds that are under or over the market, but if you don't know the league you'll probably not be able to come up with too much accurate information and you'll be uncertain. If the main goal is to make big wins on the underdog, strategy is not the highest priority. That's where recreation betting can turn into an addiction, particularly when the gambler continues to take risks for the purpose of getting that excitement.

It's my first time hearing this, but I'm curious, it mean multiple online casinos may share all of their customers' data to identify this behaviour? Or they are using 3rd party providers? I'm curious.
If multiple accounts, I believe it is easy. But these? Like knowing you registered with different casinos and do arbitrage?

I understand that the bookmakers sometimes do some guess work or will I say that they are not so certain about an even, they will try to play mind game with the odd by setting it abnormally. I had a friend who likes betting on big odds from unfamiliar leagues - that's his strategy. He believes bookmakers make mistake sometimes with unfamiliar leagues.

For the AI spammer from your local, i think he was using it to complete post, not that he understands or bet on crickets

I don't know how smart and clever they are when doing that but with unfamiliar sports and unfamiliar leagues, in my opinion there are more risk because you only can bet based on stats and head to head records. You have no understanding about these teams, athletes and you will make your bets in mostly blinded way that is more risky than usual when you bet with familiar leagues and teams.

Of course when people get bored, they will try to find something new and try their luckiness but it's not my favorite bet style as I am not rich, and if I bet, I must do it very carefully. Even so I am aware of risk of losing money with gambling and because of this awareness, I would like to reduce risk as smallest as possible by betting very selectively.

Betting on unfamiliar leagues is just like treating football like a dice, when tossed any outcome will emerge.
Football is more than that because there are statistics available to direct gamblers about their gambling decisions.

Meanwhile there are factors such as quality of coach, environmental factors as weather and other factors that determine the outcome of football. Such factors need to be considered before placing a bet.

Apart from youths team, I have seen people even betting on women events. It is not bad only if you know what you are doing, but I have never done that because I hardly understand women football.

I'm glad to announce that new statistical data from TalkImg has been translated and published in the Spanish local board, and like DS above I have also announced it in the AoBT thread. You can find it here.

Thank you for explaining why sending images via link is not supported, I think it's quite reasonable.

I have also been wondering and thinking about this as well. Actually what can we call this, either from the lawyer or they didn't care to pay close attention to whatever the AI has to generated and couples with how precised the AI could be in writing out what was in their minds.

Y'all are missing the point here. Anjouan license is the weakest for sure when compared to Curacao etc, but it solidifies the fact that the site in question is willing to spend money and have a decent bankroll indicating that they could be legit.

They could still be scammers for sure, but this is still better than zero licensing scammers who spend very little and fake licenses. Betmoco etc are proper examples. It's a decent starting point to establishing the legitimacy of a crypto gambling site.

The global financial system is structured to be controlled by a centralized currency. The government will always want to print money to cushion the effect of financial mismanagement. Therefore, Bitcoin, being a centralised currency, will not be attractive to governmental institutions. The dollar has established itself as the major currency, and it will take some decades to lose its dominance. Bitcoin would be a good alternative if it becomes more stable. However, I believe that countries will prefer to promote their local currency in international trade rather than use a currency they can't control.

The USD dollar is the only one used in the foreign market and the biggest role behind it is diplomatic politics. Moreover, many states opposed it but were later brutally and relentlessly attacked. In my opinion the foreign market should use only dollar as well as other metals. This will reduce the dominance of the dollar to some extent. however, i don't want to go this way. But if the dollar is removed from the economic market, Bitcoin will lose a lot of value because in my opinion it will be the biggest economic fallout.

Done! I was aware of that but didn't remove the link to the first translation before, like I kept a log or historical record. But I have no problem deleting it if you prefer, it does not contribute much and can lead to error.

---

We have a saying like "whoever went to Seville lost his chair" (quien se fue a Sevilla perdió su silla) which means that if in the absence of someone another one takes his place, it's the fault of the one who left in the first place

But enjoy the holidays in peace, we've saved your chair

BTW, I will translate the Statistics this weekend at the latest.

First of all: congrats Porf! 👏

---

Thank you both Chilwell and DrBeer for covering translations from the past! I announced both authors about your translations.

---

Done on my side!

And I see DS takes advantage of me being in vacation, having only my phone with me and being slow -- so he makes the announcement ahead of me ☺️