السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.

جاءتني هذه الفكرة من الأخ Rikafip عندما وصلني إشعار إشارة (Mention) منه بالأمس، ففكرت أن بياناتنا في القسم المحلي (Local Board) يجب أن نراها أيضاً. في شهر سبتمبر، بلغ إجمالي المشاركات في قسمنا العربي 222 مشاركة.

هذه هي المرة الأولى التي أقوم فيها بجمع وإعداد هذه البيانات، لذا قد تكون هناك بعض الأخطاء. لا تترددوا في تنبيهي وسأحاول تصحيحها في المرات القادمة.

دعونا نتحدث الآن عن أعلى 3 أعضاء من حيث عدد المشاركات؛ أولهم اسمي هههه، والثاني الأخ khaled0111، والثالث الأخ Kavelj22.

• 1. ObeyKnock
• 2. khaled0111
• 3. Kavelj22

دعونا الآن نستعرض الرسوم البيانية التي تغطي جميع أعضاء القسم العربي الذين شاركوا هذا الشهر. إذا كان لديكم أي ملاحظات أو أخطاء، لا تترددوا في ذكرها.

ملاحظة: استعنت بقليل من الذكاء الاصطناعي في إعداد هذه الرسوم البيانية.


كما أنشأت مخططاً دائرياً (Pie Chart) يوضح نسبة مساهمة كل عضو، وإليكم المخطط:


وهذا جدول يوضح أعلى 10 أعضاء نشاطاً هذا الشهر:


هذه محاولة بسيطة مني ومبادرة لتقديم ملخص شهري لمشاركات سبتمبر. تم جمع البيانات من موقع TryNinja الخاص بـ (bitlist.co).

قريباً جداً سأشارككم ملخص نقاط الجدارة (Merits) أيضاً، حيث لا أزال في مرحلة جمع وتحليل البيانات الخاص بها.

أتمنى أن تشاركوني آراءكم وملاحظاتكم، كيف وجدتم هذا الملخص؟

It is difficult to avoid vulnerabilities, DeFi is exploited almost every day, most exchanges and casinos have also been hacked into by criminal targets.

About Bitget we already know the results of an investigation from the SlowMist security team.
-Zero-day vulnerability.
- Unmistakable access to third-party products, using internal identity.

Which means we don't know if behind all this there is an insider involved? This investigation has not been all his, considering now hooking up to many people including Chinese artists according to some sources.

https://x.com/SlowMist_Team/status/2105145931645743534

Exactly. The first two withdrawal series per day are free, and if a player doesn’t want to pay the fee on the third series, they can simply wait until the next day. Thanks for pointing this out.

Its time for another brief overview of local boards activity, and this time for August 2026.  All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview nevertheless.

---

Post activity per local board during August 2026

During August, 15130 posts were written across local boards, which is an increase compared to July's numbers (13938 posts). Majority of this increase happened on three most active boards, but some others like Spanish had noticeable increase compared to previous month. French unfortunately continued declining and now its maybe at all time low numbers, or very close to it.

---

Active members per local board during August 2026

Despite the increase in number of posts, active members went down from 1298 in July to 1265 in August. Nigerian boards keeps dominating this chart, with only Russian being somewhat close to them.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during August 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leader is French board with 80% of such members, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage, only 11%.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Greek board with 56% while French had only 13% of such members.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Croatian board with 56% while French had only 7%.

---

Merit shared per local board during August 2026

During August, 7218 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, and is a big increase compared to July's numbers (5818). Majority of this increase happened on Germna board, that went from 612 merit sent in July to 1510 in August, almost beating Nigerians at the top.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during August 2026

In May, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, which is an increase compared to July's 0.42 merit per post. This time we have Polish board sticking out, but as seen from their last 12 month ratio, last month's was just an exception, and such a big difference can happen on less active boards.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during August 2026

During last month, 562 members sent while 598 received merit which is an expected increase compared to July (509 senders, 588 receivers). Needless to say which local boards dominates this chart as well.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during August 2026

Romanian board remained at the top of this chart with very high 58% of merited posts, but Italian also has a high number, especially considering the fact that its one of the more active local boards on the forum.

---

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during August 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habits of local boards, which (as you can see) differs from board to board.

---

The most active members per local board during August 2026

This time top 3 most active local boards members all come from the same board, Russian. klarki is at the top with 162, while jokers10 and numberal both wrote 135 posts.  GG.

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [162]	|	1. cygan [74]	|	1. mandown [113]	|	1. Italian Panic [48]	|	1. joker_josue [127]	|	1. famososMuertos [58]	|
2. jokers10 [135]	|	2. Soonandwaite [70]	|	2. MK-74 [69]	|	2. Ale88 [44]	|	2. sabotag3x [109]	|	2. darbitmobilerecovery [52]	|
3. Numeral [135]	|	3. 5tift [60]	|	3. yenerbatmaz [67]	|	3. babo [43]	|	3. bitmover [79]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [40]	|
4. safar1980 [123]	|	4. mole0815 [59]	|	4. Hvdv [67]	|	4. fillippone [43]	|	4. TryNinja [67]	|	4. Porfirii [33]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [90]	|	5. MinoRaiola [58]	|	5. kriminall [63]	|	5. Plutosky [34]	|	5. rdluffy [42]	|	5. Filicius [27]	|
6. internetional [87]	|	6. MaxMueller [58]	|	6. Phoenix Anka [62]	|	6. Ultimo2 [26]	|	6. alegotardo [42]	|	6. airbin [22]	|
7. mak013 [78]	|	7. jahead [56]	|	7. Xyloo [62]	|	7. bitbollo [25]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [41]	|	7. danadc [18]	|
8. tvplus006 [78]	|	8. Lakai01 [52]	|	8. emrecemsan [60]	|	8. alexrossi [22]	|	8. mikel_012 [40]	|	8. darxiaomi [13]	|
9. zasad@ [68]	|	9. Unknown01 [42]	|	9. Mustang Shelby [60]	|	9. gbianchi [18]	|	9. diggler [27]	|	9. RobertCG1990 [7]	|
10. klarki_mobile [55]	|	10. Real-Duke [36]	|	10. RaltcoinsB [59]	|	10. bitcoiner180 [16]	|	10. r_victory [27]	|	10. Artemis3 [6]	|

[/table[

```

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [105]	|	1. winspiral [13]	|	1. blockman [57]	|	1. slackovic [53]	|	1. Floxynice [78]	|	1. khaled0111 [39]	|
2. joniboini [55]	|	2. Benhouse [5]	|	2. Peanutswar [36]	|	2. Daniel91 [45]	|	2. Karl_3000 [77]	|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	|
3. mu_enrico [48]	|	3. TryNinja [4]	|	3. rbynxx [33]	|	3. katanic97 [41]	|	3. Africolo [54]	|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	|
4. taufik123 [44]	|	4. Danydee [1]	|	4. tech30338 [31]	|	4. ovcijisir [31]	|	4. TrialBitcoin [48]	|	4. OmegaStarScream [14]	|
5. masulum [42]	|	5. Delaforetnoire [1]	|	5. coin-investor [29]	|	5. Rikafip [29]	|	5. CryptopreneurBrainboss [47]	|	5. hugeblack [12]	|
6. Husna QA [40]	|	6. Halab [1]	|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	|	6. Pmalek [24]	|	6. PremiumcryptoHub [47]	|	6. ObeyKnock [6]	|
7. Luzin [36]	|	7. EXMON [1]	|	7. PX-Z [27]	|	7. cryptofrka [16]	|	7. Qhunman [47]	|	7. aseemhamza [3]	|
8. abhiseshakana [33]	|	8. G.Seed [1]	|	8. arwin100 [26]	|	8. examplens [14]	|	8. Samuel47 [47]	|	8. GxSTxV [2]	|
9. ryzaadit [30]	|	9. fagsosugym7314 [1]	|	9. cryptoaddictchie [26]	|	9. Trofo [13]	|	9. Hypnotizer [45]	|	9. Danydee [1]	|
10. AakZaki [28]	|	10. AL1CE M [1]	|	10. bhadz [23]	|	10. dkbit98 [10]	|	10. Mayor of ogba [44]	|	10. ajmnt [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan	|	Bengali	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [13]	|	1. Bitcoin Smith [43]	|	1. cryptosize [35]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	|	1. Fragrance1122 [56]	|	1. Review Master [25]	|
2. TryNinja [4]	|	2. JSRAW [42]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [30]	|	2. TryNinja [4]	|	2. qurbanshah02 [47]	|	2. Crypto Library [25]	|
3. pawel7777 [3]	|	3. Cointikka [42]	|	3. alani123 [7]	|	3. fillippone [4]	|	3. JunaidAzizi [43]	|	3. Bd officer [25]	|
4. EXMON [1]	|	4. eaLiTy [24]	|	4. Ultegra134 [3]	|	4. NeuroticFish [1]	|	4. HustleZ [34]	|	4. DYING_S0UL [16]	|
	|	5. pawanjain [18]	|	5. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|	5. jedaite [1]	|	5. Junii [33]	|	5. Shishir99 [12]	|
	|	6. hasan5jan7 [18]	|	6. BitcoinsGreece [2]	|	6. snaz3d [1]	|	6. AgriTrack [33]	|	6. Nothingtodo [11]	|
	|	7. Nrcewker [8]	|	7. Conqueror777 [2]	|	7. Zeeloth [1]	|	7. Abdul Sami786 [33]	|	7. Z_MBFM [11]	|
	|	8. TheUltraElite [5]	|	8. mastercryptogr [1]	|	8. BimboDev [1]	|	8. Cheema02 [29]	|	8. Royal Cap [7]	|
	|	9. M47AK16 [5]	|	9. dracarysvlr [1]	|		|	9. Nmjut [27]	|	9. NNRR [5]	|
	|	10. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|		|		|	10. GbitG [25]	|	10. God Of Thunder [4]	|

I think the most important point here worth noting is that the first two withdrawals per day are free of charge and not that the casino charges 10% from the total amount you withdraw starting with the third withdrawal in the same day. Who makes three or more withdrawals per day anyway? If you made a poll and players answered honestly, I am sure you wouldn't find many people who withdraw so many times in a single day. If you don't want to be charged a 10% withdrawal fee, wait until the next day and withdraw your money for free.

هذا هو السبب بالضبط الذي يجعلني أعتقد أنها مشكلة أكبر وليست أقل. الخدمة رقمية وبالتالي لا يوجد موقع حقيقي نظرًا لعدم وجود حدود مادية، لذلك يبدو من الغريب تقسيم التراخيص حسب الإمارة. بينما شركة الأغذية لديها موقع مادي، لذا فإن الحصول على ترخيص لكل موقع يُعد أمرًا منطقيًا.

فترة السماح هي مجرد افتراض منطقي، ومع ذلك تبقى افتراضًا لأنها لم تُحدد فعليًا في القرار. سيتعين على الشركات انتظار مزيد من التوضيحات حول ما إذا كانت هناك فترة سماح فعلية أم لا.

نعم، تم فرض عقوبات على هذه المنصات الست سابقاً Nobitex و Wallex و Bitpin و Ramzinex و Shelbit و Aban Tether. لكن Nobitex وحدها كانت تمثل حوالي 70% من حجم تداول العملات المشفرة الإيرانية و 11 مليون مستخدم في ذروتها. لذلك، بينما ربما تم فرض عقوبات عليهم، فإن ما نريد معرفته حقاً هو ما إذا كان المستخدمون قد تم منعهم فعلياً من المنصة، أم أنهم وجدوا طريقة أخرى لاستخدامها بعد كل عقوبة.

لا اعلم ماعلاقة سرقة مثحف او سوق بالموضوع الذي نناقشه, ولكن لابسط عليك المسئلة, تخيل انك تمكنت من اختراق منصة باينانس وايضا اخترقت نظام مصرف في ايطاليا, ايهما الاسهل لتصريف ماتود ان تسرقه؟ بدون اذنى شك باينانس ستكون اسهل, كل ماعليك فعله هوا انشاء عنوان بتكوين او ايثيريوم وتحويل الاموال عليه وحتى هده المرحلة يمكنك البقاء مجهول الهوية, في المقابل في حال اخترقت المصرف الايطالي الى اين ستحول الاموال؟ يجب عليك تحويلها الى حساب مصرفي باسم شخص ما لديه حساب مثلا في مصرف في القاهرة, ثم عليك انتظار تأكيد الحوالة التي قد تستغرق بعض الوقت وربما تتطلب تأكيد بشري, ومن ثم حتى لو وصلت الاموال الى ذلك المصرف لن تنتهي القصة, لو كان الحساب ملك لك فسوق يتم القبض عليك مباشرة, ان كان لصديقك ايضا كذلك, ان كان لشخص اخر قمت انت باختراق بياناته فما زال لديك الكثير لتقوم به لكي تضع المال تحت تصرفك.

Yes, the withdrawal option is activated when you have anything to withdraw (no money = no withdraw option - simple as that).


This is a bug, for a very logical reason - you can't make a withdrawal without making a deposit first.


They found out today about it and it was forwarded to their technical department:



Can you explain to me how you would like to make a withdrawal without making a deposit first?

---

You left out a very important fact. Every day (within 24 hours) two withdrawals in Reels are with zero fees.

I think this is worth clarifying, and we’ve actually already removed the 18+ confirmation from the platform because we can see that some people were interpreting it differently.

The 18+ checkbox was never intended to be a KYC or age verification procedure. It was simply a self-declaration and a general responsible-gaming notice. We did not ask users to upload any documents or provide any information to prove their age.

To be clear, we do not collect or store identity documents or personal verification information from users, and we have no plans to introduce such a system. This is why we describe the platform as No KYC.

Know Your Customer (KYC) normally refers to an identity verification process used by financial services, casinos and other platforms, where users may be required to provide documents or other personal information to verify their identity.

The 18+ checkbox was therefore never meant to contradict the No KYC approach. It was simply a formal confirmation that the user understood the platform was intended for adults and that we are not responsible for losses or similar claims.

For example, many websites simply ask users to confirm that they are 18+ without requiring them to submit an ID or other documentation. The confirmation itself does not make it a KYC procedure.

To avoid any further confusion around this, we have removed the 18+ checkbox altogether. There is no identity or document verification on our platform.

If you have any further questions about this, feel free to ask. We’ll do our best to answer them and clarify anything that may still be unclear.

Hold up here, I am not accusing AlfaBet of anything, I never got scammed. Please read exactly what I said.

I merely stated the facts on what happened. Let me just list out what exactly happened.

1. Let me try my best to quote it in the wording they sent me. "100% bonus on a 4K Deposit, 400% bonus on a 10K Deposit, with 0x wagering requirements." But after I said its too good to be true and its a massive red flag, they changed it to 5x Wager requirement for the 400% bonus, even insisting that they missed out that information when they first sent it to me, even after we had like close to an hour long conversation about me trying to tell them no casino in the world will offer such an  offer.

2. He deleted the entire Telegram Chat straight after he saw my post on the forumn

3. He did send me 15K but it was Non-Withdrawable. No idea why he is making it seem like he gave me 15K Balance with 0x wager requirement as if I could withdraw it if I wanted to. I literally have 0 activity on the site, which casino will give a new player 15K withdrawable cash just because he asked

You’re absolutely free to discuss the terms and share your opinion about them. However, we don’t agree with the assumption that this policy is some kind of “trick” based on players not reading the Terms.

The withdrawal conditions are openly stated in our T&C, and the first two withdrawal series per day are free. The 10% fee applies only from the third series onwards. Different casinos use different withdrawal policies, and the fact that you haven’t encountered this particular model before doesn’t mean it is hidden or designed to mislead players.

بصراحة، الخلاطات ليست فعالة باستمرار. العديد من الخلاطات الأكبر، مثل Tornado Cash، تخضع للمراقبة أو العقوبات. وهذا من شأنه أن يحد من الخيارات المتاحة إلى حد كبير.

أيضاً، لقد قرأت المقال، لكنني لم أتمكن من العثور على هذه الجزئية. تصف مصادر متعددة هذا بأنه الجزء الأخير من حملة Operation Economic Outcast ولكن لا يذكر أي منها أن جميع الخيارات البديلة للوصول إلى هذه المنصات المتاحة لإيران قد تم فرض عقوبات عليها. هل يمكنك إرفاق رابط هذه الجزئية؟

رخصة VARA فعلا بتاخذ 3 الى 9 شهور بس هذا اسرع من اغلب الانظمة المنافسة زي بريطانيا وسنغافورة، فهذا الجزء يدعم كلامك.

ولهذا السبب، فإن الاضطرار إلى الحصول على ترخيص كامل في أبوظبي وكذلك في دبي يمثل مشكلة. لا يمكنك استخدام ترخيص ADGM بشكل متبادل لشركتك التي تتخذ من دبي مقراً لها والعكس صحيح.

لذلك، إذا كنت ترغب في الحصول على ترخيص VARA في دبي ولكنك ترغب في ممارسة الأعمال التجارية في أبوظبي أيضاً، فسيتعين عليك التقدم بطلب للحصول على ترخيص ADGM كامل. وهذا يمثل مشكلة.

I support your comment foe not giving the final judgement now, but lohxuankai said the Op deleted the conversation in telegram therefore he can't provide any evidence from his end. And this has made the accusation complicated to judge, but looking at the Op here, the bonus system and some promises are not factual in mere looking. They looks like trying to lure people to their site.

They lied in this statement as well. I have opened account yesterday and there was no bonus given to the account instead I saw a deposit bonus. They would have said first deposit bonus of 400% and not opening bonus.

You are rushing the verdict here without any sort of proper proof to justify your statements. This may or may not be a scam site, but they should be given a fair chance to defend themselves especially when the accuser hasn't provided any proof at all.

Both of them clearly couldn't reach an amicable deal thanks to which they proceeded to slander each other. Think!

I think there is a bit of confusion between KYC, age verification and licensing here.

“No KYC” doesn't mean “no age check” or “no compliance”. In our case, the age check is simply asking whether the user is 18+. We are not asking for their exact date of birth, passport, ID or any other identity documents.

So there is a big difference between simply confirming “I am 18+” and actually verifying someone's identity.

A gaming licence is also not simply a requirement to collect a passport from every player. It is about regulating the operator and the gambling activity itself: player protection, responsible gaming, AML, security, game integrity, payments, reporting, etc.

Also, I wouldn't interpret “No KYC” as “the platform can never ask for any information under any circumstances”. Depending on the jurisdiction and the situation, additional verification can still be required.

So I don't really see a contradiction between a platform being No KYC and having a simple 18+ confirmation. The important question is what kind of verification is actually required and when.

Licensing ≠ KYC ≠ age verification. These are three different things.

Again, reading the terms is the player's responsibility. If they just accept the ToS without reading it especially the section with withdrawal informations such as minimum amount, fees, and so on, it will be their fault to missed this kind of information. This is also the first time I encounter this kind of terms and percentage of withdrawal fee. Most of the online casinos I've played at either they don't have a withdrawal fee or have a fixed eithdrawal fee depending on the crypto they used for withdrawal. So, maybe they can do anything about it or at least change the amount of fee when withdrawing funds for their players.

ToS can be changed with time and discussions for raising need of user community are parts of important ideas for ToS updates.

An online casino is created to serve users, to bring money to casino operators so generally customers first. They decide whether a casino succeeds with positive business revenue or negative one, so opinion from user community if valid, must be taken into consideration of possible ToS changes as one of top priorities.

The online gambling industry is very competitive and gamblers certainly have many options to choose platforms for betting. They don't have limited choices, and they don't have any restriction to only use any online casino.

The 10% extra charged fee for third withdrawal in a day and later withdrawals is too much, I agree with discussion here so far that it needs to be changed, lower it down.

Hard to use the excuse for not knowing the rules, while in fact upon registration there's a text below that remind the players to read their TOS.

So if they missed something, because they don't read it, then its their fault. If they just read that on early part, maybe those people won't will get confuse about this matter. Then could able to adapt with the rules been implemented by this casino.

Also I think that's good initiative already, if they don't want to be charge on their withdrawals. Maybe they should limit it to  once or twice in a day.

Well, that's actually true because it's the player's responsibility to read the ToS before they even start playing. It's publicly available, players just beed to take a little of their time to read and understand the important details they need to know such as this terms that there's a fee that will apply on the third withdrawal within the same day.


I don't see any problem with this as long as the first two withdrawals will remain as free of charge. Players just need to be mindful of the number of times they withdraw in a single day if they want to avoid paying extra fees.

We understand your point, but we don’t think it’s fair to assume that this policy is designed to take advantage of players who don’t read the Terms. The withdrawal conditions are stated in our T&C and are available to review before playing.

Players have two withdrawal series per day without this fee, and the 10% fee only applies starting from the third series within the same day.

نظريا كلامك صحيح، بس عمليا التنسيق بين 5 جهات مختلفة نادرا ما يكون سلس 100% زي ما تتوقع، حتى لو كانت الشروط متقاربة، مجرد وجود اكثر من جهة تعني وقت اضافي بالتواصل والتنسيق بينهم، خصوصا لو شركة نشاطها يغطي اكثر من امارة او اكثر من فئة نشاط بنفس الوقت.


أتفق معك 100%. لدي تحفظات على فكرة الإيقاف الفوري، لأن ذلك قد يضر بالمستخدمين الأبرياء وتصبح أموالهم عالقة دون القدرة على سحبها.

لهذا السبب أعتقد أنه سيكون من الأفضل فرض غرامة. عند فرض الغرامة، ستستمر المنصة في العمل وتكون قادرة على تعويض المتضررين.

ما رأيك في فرض غرامة وتحديد مهلة للمنصة لإجراء التغييرات اللازمة وتعويض المستخدمين، وإذا لم يتمكنوا من القيام بذلك في الوقت المحدد يتم إيقافها؟

كانت هناك حالتان هذا الأسبوع Duelbits و Bitget في نفس اليوم، لذا فإن الحوادث ليست نظرية بل تحدث فعلياً.

.

The biggest advantage of Telegram Wallet is simply that it is already inside an app people use every day. Sending crypto without opening another app or copying wallet addresses can definitely be convenient, especially for small payments.

But personally, I still see dedicated wallets as more suitable for holding larger amounts. A messaging app and a financial wallet serve very different purposes, and I would rather keep those things separate. Also, some of the wallet features seem to depend on the user's country, so the experience isn't necessarily the same for everyone.

For me, Telegram Wallet makes more sense as a convenient spending or transfer tool than as my main wallet. The convenience is there, but whether that is enough to change people's existing wallet habits is another question.