I have been able to access the site.

Earlier, I tried it with my laptop and it got that “error” message but now I tried accessing with my mobile phone and it worked fine for me.

I’ll go back and see if my laptop would be able to open it now, or if the issue was probably just a network connection issue.

How does the $ prevent other currencies to surge?
Bitcoin without the $ has no value. No crypto has value without their counterpart.

Thanks for the constructive feedback DanWalker 💙

Terms and Conditions: Regarding the inactivity fee, it has already been completely removed and is fully updated in our official Terms and Conditions

VPN Policy and Access: To clarify once and for all, we are a fully VPN friendly platform, no user is legally restricted or penalized simply for using a VPN, as long as they aren't violating our general terms (like fraudulent activity), using a VPN will never cause any issues here

Restricted Countries and Providers: Regarding the list of restricted countries based on providers, we definitely appreciate the suggestion and will publish a clear overview on the site soon, in the meantime, our system's live filter handles this dynamically, it automatically shows players the exact games and providers available in their region so they don't have to guess

As it is a new site, since there is no tier-1 or recognized license yet, it is better not to try a large amount here before getting a proper license.

I have seen many new casinos here show proof of reserve at very beginning to increase confidence of users. So I think if klyroll is really transparent, they can also open proof of reserve then more confidence will increase.


You have removed the inactivity fee, it is very good decision. The fact that you have removed the inactivity fee should also be updated in Terms.


So I think it would be useful if you clearly publish actual restricted country list and explain what happen if someone uses VPN from restricted jurisdiction. I want you to succeed but more transparency is needed to clear the doubt of players.

I am completely new and do not have enough knowledge of Bitcoin and its related stuff. Just because of this, I prefer reading more about this because it's always work being a student in college. I learn a few things about technology and learning, but here on this forum I have enough, which is helping in real life as well because studying and always being hungry for new things gives me more chances of understanding.
Life has never been easy, but always keep reading and learning; give good lessons, which always work in real life. I am regularly going on technical boards and other sections, but mostly my motivation is having new things and increasing knowledge with reading.
Hopefully in the near future I will be able to share my knowledge with others; this could be helpful for the community.

Please choose your words more carefully, we are speaking correctly here, not lies, so there is no need for baseless accusations.
No, we are not associated with any other casino, also we use AI tools in our workflow, just like everyone else.






Just to clarify, we didn't mean to imply you were saying we weren't transparent, we were simply emphasizing that we've been 100% transparent about everything from day one.

We are actively working on securing the proper license, we don't restrict access from any country, and VPNs are totally fine, regarding game availability, we don't block users the system automatically filters and displays only the providers and games that are allowed in the player's specific region, so they won't have to waste time searching for what works

As for AI, we use it as an assistant in our workflow, not to speak or share opinions on our behalf here every message in this thread is written by us directly

Thanks again for looking out 💙






Thanks for the feedback, just to clarify, we don't use AI to speak on our behalf or share our thoughts every reply here is written by us directly, we only use AI tools as a workflow assistant in the background.
Thanks for the feedback.






Appreciate the concern, but as we’ve already mentioned, we handle our communication directly and know our platform inside and out.
Thanks for the feedback.






We completely agree that genuine community engagement and human interaction are important, which is why we are here talking to you directly.
Thanks for the advice. 💙

Looks unprofessional for doing such thing. Because that means they are lacking with knowledge on the business they are operating.

Maybe its good for whoever own this site to know lot of things about their casino, so they won't rely on Ai providing replies to people asking questions.

If they continue to do that and ignore this suggestions. Many people will not going to play in their casino, because they might get disappointed on how they handle this thread. First impression is always important and I think they would fail to impressed people base on the actions they have done here.

Good point, Kavelj22, That's exactly why we've already removed that rule
You're totally right, it makes no sense to penalize someone just because they're away for a bit





Hello DYING_S0UL,

About License, no Costa Rica registration is not an iGaming license, It is simply a corporate registration, we are operating under this structure while we work towards securing a proper license, we've been 100% transparent about this from the start.

VPN and restricted countries, we do not restrict VPN usage, our platform is built for privacy, so players are free to use a VPN.

About AI responses,  we don't use it to generate our forum replies every message here is written by us, ბut yes, of course we use AI tools in our day-to-day operations and workflow, just like pretty much every tech company today.

Hope that clears things up 🙏

Appreciate you breaking that down, panjul07, and looking at it objectively. 💙

That said, based on the community's overall feedback, we've actually decided to remove/revise this specific inactivity fee clause entirely. Even though the original intent was just to manage dormant accounts responsibly, we want to make sure our terms leave zero room for misunderstanding and remain fully player-friendly.

Thanks for the fair take.






Thanks for pointing that out, negotiation4.

Just to clarify, multi-account and related-party clauses are standard across the industry primarily to prevent bonus abuse and syndicate multi-accounting, rather than targeting regular players. However, we completely agree that vague wording can cause unnecessary confusion.

As we're currently reviewing our terms to make them as player-friendly and transparent as possible, we'll definitely take a close look at refining this clause too. Appreciate the eagle-eyed review.

I cant also understand why this term is taken as something bad by some people until thinking about the casino making scam accusations against players because of this terms is not making any senses.
The terms is clear enough, as what is written that the casino will try to contact the account first before starting to charge the inactivity fee or before the account is considered as inactive.
If we read and understand the term properly, this term or to be more specific the inactivity is simply applied for dormant account with some balance only. dormant accounts without any balance do not need to worry about this term because the casino has nothing to charge.

Hello Zwei, thanks for chiming in,

Just to reiterate what we mentioned earlier, public addresses or gateway routers spotted on-chain do not represent our operational treasury or total liquidity. As a crypto-native platform, we manage our liquidity across cold storage and dedicated routing structures for security reasons.

Regarding the inactivity fee and terms mentioned: we hear you loud and clear. We are currently reviewing and updating our Terms of Use to ensure they are fully aligned with player-friendly, fair standards. Our goal is to build a platform based on trust, and we're actively working on refining these clauses right now based on community feedback.

We completely understand why transparency is a major talking point for new platforms, and we're continuously working on improving how we present our operational strength without compromising security.
Appreciate you keeping the discussion active. 💙






Appreciate the perspective, Kavelj22, You're definitely right that most players skip the fine print, which is why we're taking another look at those terms to make sure everything is clear and fair for everyone.

Regarding the wallet side of things, keeping operational treasury and storage addresses private is standard industry practice for security and risk management. Publicly exposing primary liquidity pools just invites unnecessary targets, which is why we keep our main funds structured safely behind the scenes.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. 💙

المفروض ان يكون الامر كذلك. المنطق يقول ان البرامج مفتوحة المصدر من المفترض ان تكون اكثر امانا من البرامج مغلقة المصدر، لكن للاسف الواقع عكس ذلك، و حتى لا اعمم، فعلى الاقل هناك حالات عديدة حدث فيها العكس.
ما حدث مع محفظة كولد كارد هو احد الامثلة على ذلك فهي مفتوحة المصدر لكن تم اختراقها.

technically you can count cards in online blackjack, but is it worth the time and money? absolutely fucking not. one will make more begging on the streets.
you will need to sit there for a shit amount of hours counting cards to find a shoe with a true count high enough to give you an edge, but you will only be able to make a few bets before they reshuffle after dealing 4 or 5 decks.

i'm kinda terrible at explaining this, so you can watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjiVpO1hlvk. it pretty much goes into all the details why online card counting is so ridiculous when a casino accuses someone of doing it.

the provider have all the table data, so they can calculate the true count for every hand and compare it to each player betting pattern.

they like to keep the "fraud" and "unfair edge" terms vague on purpose so they can bend them to use in all situations however they like.

Card counting is basically useless online for so many reasons. If a casino gives this excuse they simply don't want to pay, that's all. Just google it, everywhere you will find the same information because the games are set up the way that you can't make a profit counting cards, simple as that.
There is a HUGE difference between online BJ and real casino BJ.

There’s a post where the Winna representative gave a more detailed answer about card counting:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5562065.msg65911489#msg65911489

As far as I know, detection is handled by the service provider, such as Pragmatic, for example
That’s what they said

The TOS don’t mention anything specific about card counting, they only address it in general terms

هذا أمر جيد حقا ، أهم ما حصل بعد هذه المعمعة التي افتعلها مايكل سايلور هو أن السوق لم يتعد يتأثر بقرارات شركة استراتيجي سواء في البيع أو الشراء وهذا أمر جيد وصحي تماما للسوق.

هذا أفضل بكثير أن يكون السوق لامركزي بشكل كامل ولا يتأثر بقرارات أي شركة والشيء الجيد الآخر كم ذكر الأخ Kavelj22 هو أنه لم يحدث تلاعب بالسوق مع أن الكثيرين ظنوا أن هذه خطة سايلور للتلاعب بالسوق لكن حتى الآن يبدو أنه لايوجد شيء مع أن استراتيجي بالكميات الضخمة التي لديها من البيتكوين قادرة على التلاعب بالسوق.

Thank you for your comment and for sharing your perspective.
I think there may be a small misunderstanding. Right now, Bonus.Cloud isn’t a large company with different departments or a dedicated marketing team. It’s just two people building something we’re genuinely interested in.
At this stage, our goal is simply to find out whether this idea is useful to other people. We’re not trying to compete with AskGamblers or other established platforms. We just want to make casino bonuses easier to understand by explaining their terms and conditions in a simpler way.
If we see that the project is valuable to the community, we’ll naturally invest more time and resources into it, including expanding the team.
In any case, thank you for the advice. We’ll definitely keep it in mind as the project grows.