هذا أمر جيد حقا ، أهم ما حصل بعد هذه المعمعة التي افتعلها مايكل سايلور هو أن السوق لم يتعد يتأثر بقرارات شركة استراتيجي سواء في البيع أو الشراء وهذا أمر جيد وصحي تماما للسوق.

هذا أفضل بكثير أن يكون السوق لامركزي بشكل كامل ولا يتأثر بقرارات أي شركة والشيء الجيد الآخر كم ذكر الأخ Kavelj22 هو أنه لم يحدث تلاعب بالسوق مع أن الكثيرين ظنوا أن هذه خطة سايلور للتلاعب بالسوق لكن حتى الآن يبدو أنه لايوجد شيء مع أن استراتيجي بالكميات الضخمة التي لديها من البيتكوين قادرة على التلاعب بالسوق.

Thank you for your comment and for sharing your perspective.
I think there may be a small misunderstanding. Right now, Bonus.Cloud isn’t a large company with different departments or a dedicated marketing team. It’s just two people building something we’re genuinely interested in.
At this stage, our goal is simply to find out whether this idea is useful to other people. We’re not trying to compete with AskGamblers or other established platforms. We just want to make casino bonuses easier to understand by explaining their terms and conditions in a simpler way.
If we see that the project is valuable to the community, we’ll naturally invest more time and resources into it, including expanding the team.
In any case, thank you for the advice. We’ll definitely keep it in mind as the project grows.

كما ذكر الأخ خالد، هذا المشكل في محفظة كولد كارد فقط و ليس المحافظ الأخرى. Trezor, Bitkey, Ledger, Keystone, الخ كلها قامت بتصريحات لطمأنة مستخدميها.

أما بالنسبة للمشاركة التي أشرت اليها فما الذي يجعلك تقول أن هذا هو  مؤسس كولد كارد؟

---

كتحديث: لقد قام أحد الأشخاص ببناء هذا الموقع لتتبع كمية الخسائر  و عناوين المخترق

https://coldcard-watch.vercel.app/

بعدما كانت الخسائر قد بلغت 38 مليون دولار عند انشائي للموضوع، هاهي اليوم تبلغ 70 مليون دولار (1128 بيتكوين).

Thank you for sharing your perspective.

We completely agree that choosing which casinos to list is a very important responsibility. Unfortunately, if you look at almost any crypto casino—including some of the biggest and most established brands—you’ll find complaints, scam accusations, and negative reviews somewhere on the internet. No casino has a perfect reputation, and their Terms & Conditions often give operators broad discretion to suspend accounts or request additional verification when they consider it necessary.
For that reason, we don’t believe it’s realistic to claim that only “perfect” casinos should be listed, because such casinos simply don’t exist.
As for what makes Bonus.Cloud different, we’ll let the community decide that over time. Our goal isn’t to compete by having the biggest database or the flashiest design. Instead, we’re trying to solve one specific problem: making casino bonuses easy to understand.
We haven’t come across many websites that explain, step by step, how to claim a bonus, summarize the most important Terms & Conditions in plain language, and highlight the details that actually matter—such as wagering requirements, minimum deposits, maximum cashout rules, claiming instructions, and other important restrictions.
That’s the gap we’re trying to fill. Whether we succeed is something the community will ultimately decide, but we’ll continue improving the project based on feedback like yours.

Thanks again for taking the time to share your thoughts.

نعم أخي معك حق هذه نقطة مهمة بالفعل إذا تم الإيداع من منصة مركزية فالأموال ستعاد إلى عنوان  المحفظة الساخنة للمنصة المركزية وليس إلى حساب المستخدم وبالتالي ستضيع على المستخدمين وبالتالي من قام بالإيداع من المنصات المركزية عليه أن يقوم بسحب أمواله يدويا قبل 13 الشهر الجاري وإلا ستضيع عليه.

هذا هو بالتحديد ما اردت معرفته و هو ان كانت العقوبات تشمل حظر المنصة من النشاط في دول معينة. شكرا على توضيح ذلك. في هذه الحال، من الاكيد ان مثل هذه الاجراءات ستتسبب في خسارة كبيرة للمنصة لكن ان تقوم بايقاف دعمها لروسيا بسبب ذلك سيكون رهينا بسبب دعمها لها من الاساس رغم الحضر المفروض عليها. يعني اذا كانت تقوم بذلك من اجل الربح فقط و تعتقد انها يمكن ان تفلت بذلك فعلى الاغلب ستوقف هذا الدعم خاصة ان كانت الخسارة بسبب العقوبات اكبر من الربح من تعاملاتها مع روسيا. اما ان كانت تدعم روسيا بشكل ممنهج لاسباب سياسية مثلا فلا اعتقد ان اي شيئ سيتغير حتى بعد فرض العقوبات عليها.

Having license doesn't really guaranteed that the casino would not scam people who are gambling on that particular website, but people so much believed that a license casinos can't bridge users trust, and as a matter of fact being licensed is like a free access for people to keep trooping on that particular gambling site.
As a gambler, you must know your right in regards to the gambling site that are being licensed. Of course you are right, the license is like a general access to operate in some other countries if that covers all those areas.

The real impact of failure lies in the way we react to it. A person can fail and rise to become better in his craft why another person can fail and give up completely. The later accepted failure as a defeat while the first person accepted failure as a challenge to do better. Starting all over again can be challenging and requires strong zeal to take the bold step. Over time, some people that started all over rise to become a better version of what they used to be. The things a person has to be conscious of when he is trying to start again should include;

Finding out what he did wrongly in his first trial: was he trading instead of investing? Was he buying under fear of missing out? Was he buying more than his finances can carry? Was he careless with his wallet security? If he is able to define these factors and other factors that led to his failure, then he will know what next to do.

Correcting his mistakes: After picking out the reason for his failure, he figures out the way forward, switching from trading to investing, avoiding buying under fear of missing out, ensuring that he does not buy above what his finances can carry, being more security conscious and also finding out many other factors he can use to improve his game.

If a person fails and breaks out of the failure successfully, he mostly becomes a better version of himself and more successful even in his bitcoin accumulation and other related life experiences.

So, basically $14 out of the required $20 or a 1x wagering, give or take. Thanks for sharing.

It's also worth noting that an email verification is required to make a withdrawal and that the minimum withdrawal amount is actually $10 (at least for USDC/USDT)


They've already stated that only the first 100 eligible users get the bonus. If they allow all new users to claim every 24 hours, that's just not good for their promo. Their answer seems pretty clear to me: one-time claim per user means once you've claimed the bonus, you can never claim it again.

Thanks for sharing this info. I guess that proves that a withdrawal of the deposit bonus is possible.

Just to clear up some of this confusion, perhaps what is meant is "1 participant only receives 1X bonus and the bonus will be credited within a maximum of 24 hours," isn't that right, @SCORAS?

And I also want to provide some information for bonus recipients, as I've already received the bonus myself. Withdrawals require at least 1X the wager of the deposit amount. Withdrawals cannot be processed immediately if no wager is placed until the wager is completed. I've made a withdrawal and it was successful after I completed the wager, and I still have my remaining bets. Hopefully, my withdrawal will go smoothly if my bet wins

the thing is that with the license you can trust a casino and the any person that does not have license can be easily scam their users but anyone that I have last in it will be difficult to scam their users, at first if a casino have a license that means the casino is being registered and they cannot do contrary above the condition I was giving to them during the registration that warrant then to operate with license, so that is one of the things that we have to consider and focus on the casino that operate with license and leave those ones who did not have license to operate because they can easily scam you

Boh the question and the reply seem to be a bit off. Sometimes, it’s even a bit funny.

No matter how you fail in life, don’t see it as your final bus stop. If someone decide that because they have fail once or twice, and because of it, they decide to   give up completely,  it’s just as if the person has stop to live even if his still breathing. Life has more opportunities if you decide to start all over again.

 The funniest thing about life is that life, doesn’t put age limit in fresh beginning. Whether you are 20 - 50 or even more older, if you’re dedicated and learn from your past mistakes, you can still rise nothing to something. Many successful people today once failed before they finally made it. Failure isn’t the end of life, it’s a lesson that prepares someone for a better opportunity. As long as you’re alive, there’s hope.

Yep. BIT-BENDER already made that clear, and I've already acknowledged my mistake. No need to repeat things over. 
Calm down, bro. No one's reputation got damaged; I was only curious as to what's with the connections to that deposit address.

Post deleted as requested.    Maybe @BIT-BENDER should unquote the post, too.

Maybe you must have not known but that address is owned by Shasan and I sent money there when repaying my loan.

We have tons of vouch history and vouch channel with reviews why you making justification without knowing the prediction you can check telegram username since 2018 also ask for vouches it will help with whatever it is your digging for

Perhaps he meant this Binance deposit address: bc1q6d9ag0wuyn3lguexadpqh4prlugv8jy5ersyqx

Mr. Reporter made multiple deposits on it from this address: bc1qnu8j3jykjf7yr4a2u4llts0x7jc8y22dd4ms4t ^{(Address ownership Archive)}


Interestingly, there are several accounts that deposited to that address too.
1. mcdouglasx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1711698)
From this address: bc1qxs47ttydl8tmdv8vtygp7dy76lvayz3r6rdahu ^{(Address ownership Archive)}


2. BIT-BENDER (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2709246)
From this address: bc1qftrcsa35qdhy0dhc3ztjz9fv0rlrpaw4nq7pt7 ^{(Address ownership Archive)}


3. Kavelj22 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2443746)
From this address: bc1qaf9k43k4n3htgpy66u8y83l8f8n9mlssevxqn7 ^{(Address ownership Archive)}


I see God Of Thunder in there too, but I guess that's from him paying signature campaign rewards. As for the other accounts... no idea why they use the same Binance deposit address. BTW, 3 of them are all in the same campaign right now.

From my time in this forum, it would also not be out of place to think that it is op who is luring people to text them on Telegram, with illicit intention.

As for the Telegram username, you should take a look at op's post history, their Telegram username is in almost every post they have made in this forum. Op seems to be offering a service that you have to contact them on TG for, i don't know if anyone has used the service in this forum yet, to confirm if it is legitimate.

لا أخي المحفظة تدعم شبكات متعددة وليس USDC  فقط هذه الخدمة تم إضافتها مؤخرا لكن بالأساس محفظة سامسونج محفظة متعددة الشبكات وتدعم بلوكتشاين البيتكوين وبلوكتشاين الإيثريوم والعملات المبنية عليها من نوع ERC-20  وكذلك شبكة ترون (TRON) والعملات المبنية عليها من نوع TRC-10 و TRC-20
يعني تستطيع تخزين كل هذه العملات وتملك مفاتيحها كأي محفظة خارجية غير احتجازية

بالنسبة لمشاركة البيانات لا أعتقد أن هناك أي مشاركة للبيانات لأن محفظة سامسونج تقنيا تشبه المحافظ الصلبة تريزور أو ليدجر أي يتم توليد عبارة الاسترداد (المكونة من 12 أو 24 كلمة) وتشفيرها بالكامل داخل رقاقة هاردوير معزولة داخل الهاتف تُدعى (Trusted Execution Environment - TEE).هذه الرقاقة منفصلة تماماً عن نظام الأندرويد الأساسي وعن خوادم شركة سامسونج، ولا تخرج الكلمات أو المفاتيح الخاصة منها إلى الإنترنت نهائياً.
https://fintech-alliance.com/news-insights/article/samsung-blockchain-wallet-introduction

لكن طبعا الخوف أن برنامج المحفظة مغلق وليس مفتوح المصدر وبالتالي لايمكن أن يكون مضمون 100% وتكون هناك ثغرات مخفية كما حدث مع محفظة ليدجر ذات البرنامج المغلق

أما بالنسبة للبذرة فهي ليست خاصة بأجهزة سامسونج فقط بل يمكن استيرادها إلى أي محفظة برمجية خارجية تدعم المعيار العالمي القياسي BIP39 ، يعني تقدر تستورد البذرة إلى أي محفظة تستخدم هذا المعيار مثل MetaMask أو Trust Wallet

With the rate at which the memecions market delth with new investors who instead building knowledge and making research about the market went ahead to risk their money on coins like Melanie memecion, what I noticed with this memecion is that unlike Trump memecion that went to all time highs, Melanie memecion on the other hand never increased in such significant value since it lunch so, why on earth will make anyone to chose Melanie memecion as a choice to start off your crypto investment on.

Ooh, look who's calling us a scammer—our little buddy here, who has done nothing but accuse us since the very start of this thread, all without ever having any actual experience with our site.

Maybe they could able to do those abusive act for now while they are in power. But for sure they cannot erase the track of their wrong doings, then also restore the trust of people which got affected by those huge dumps happen with their memecoins.

The damage is already created and if we notice on discussions about those shitcoins . Many people didn't forget about those multiple scams they have made.

Let's find out if Trump would face a legal consequences once his terms ends. Its interesting to know if there are investors will file a case towards financial loss they experienced from those dead tokens.