Last update: 2026-01-29_Thu_16.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Kavelj22 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Kavelj22
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Kavelj22" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66347512 (unedited backup) (by Abdullah6969) (scraped on Thu Jan 29 11:43:49 CET 2026) in ميتاماسك تضيف دعم بيتكوين الأصلي:
الخطوة ذكية من ناحية UX وتوسيع قاعدة المستخدمين، خصوصًا للمبتدئين اللي كانوا متخوفين من محافظ بيتكوين التقليدية. دمج BTC داخل ميتاماسك فعلاً يقلل الاحتكاك ويخلّي الدخول أسهل، لكن يظل مهم ننتبه لموضوع self-custody وإدارة المفاتيح، لأن السهولة أحيانًا تجي على حساب الوعي الأمني. برأيي نعم، التأثير إيجابي على التبني، بس ما يغني عن تعلّم أساسيات بيتكوين نفسها.
نعم الخطوة جيدة لتوسيع قادة المستخدمين وخاصة المبتدئين الذين لايفضلون التعامل مع محافظ بيتكوين الرئيسية ومعتادين على استخدام ميتاماسك.
لكن أي شخص لديه خبرة لن يقبل أن يضع بيتكوينه في ميتامسك لأنها أولا عبارة عن إضافة في متصفح وهذه ثغرة خطيرة بحد ذاتها تجعلها أقل أمان وعرضة للخطر بشكل دائم بالإضافة إلى أن ميتامسك ليست لامركزية بالكامل لأنه رأينا كيف فعلت بالمستخدمين الروس أثناء بداية الأزمة الأوكرانية.
كلامك مفهوم، ومخاوف إضافة المتصفح حقيقية، خصوصًا لمن يهتم بالـ OPSEC ويفصل بين hot wallets وcold storage. بس برضه لازم نعترف إن أغلب المستخدمين الجدد أصلاً مش هيبدأوا بـ hardware wallet أو Electrum، وميتاماسك بالنسبة لهم خطوة انتقالية تقلل friction. المشكلة مو في الأداة نفسها، قد ما هي في إن الناس تعرف حدودها: للتجربة والمبالغ الصغيرة تمام، أما التخزين الجدي فالكل يعرف إن الحلول المتخصصة والأكثر لامركزية ما لها بديل.
الاستعمال الذكي لمحفظة ميتاماسك يكون بتحديد طريقة و نوعية الاستخدام، اي لا يجب ان ينبني على موثوقية كاملة كانها محفظة هاردوير لامركزية بالكامل. اولا يجب محاولة الاستغناء تماما عن استعمال اضافة المتصفح Navigator addon باكثر قدر ممكن الا في حالات استثنائية خاصة، و تركيز تخصيص الاستخدام لتطبيق الهاتف الذي يمكن اعتباره الاكثر امانا. ثانيا، ان يتم استخدام المحفظة لاتمام عمليات تحويل بمبالغ ليست كبيرة، اي ان يتم التخلي تماما عن فكرة استخدامها كمحفظة للتخزين البارد او حتى على مدى قصير الى متوسط اذا كان المبلغ بحجم كبير.
بقدر ماهو مهم اضافة شبكة البيتكوين على ميتاماسك من ناحية رفاه المستخدمين من جهة و اتساع رقعة الانتشار من جهة اخرى، فانه يجب التعاطي مع جميع وسائل الحماية و الوعي بدرجة المخاطرة اثناء كل استخدام.
ميتاماسك مش حل لكل الحالات، هو أداة لسيناريوهات محددة فقط. إذا استُخدم كـ hot wallet لمبالغ صغيرة وعمليات مؤقتة مع فهم الـ attack surface والمخاطر، فالأمر طبيعي.
المشكلة تبدأ لما يُستخدم كبديل عن cold storage مع تجاهل أساسيات الـ OPSEC — هنا الخلل في توقعات المستخدم، مش في الأداة نفسها.
2. Post 66345135 (unedited backup) (by Lakai01) (scraped on Wed Jan 28 18:08:55 CET 2026) in AI scam on Telegram:
[...]
I don't think this is enough to know who is your friend you trusted the most to go into a Zoom call or whatever app that you weren't used before.
I also don't think that knowing your friends on Facebook and other social media platforms is enough. The attack must be much more targeted and involve real social engineering to find out more about the victim, for example, who the victim regularly talks to on the phone and when such calls take place. If, for example, one of my “Facebook friends” whom I hardly ever see in real life or with whom I hardly ever talk on the phone were to call me, I would immediately be suspicious if this person actually called and then asked me to install something.
So I don't think the whole thing happened purely by chance.
3. Post 66344584 (unedited backup) (by AnwarKhattabAnwar) (scraped on Wed Jan 28 15:30:19 CET 2026) in ما هو تقييمك لأداء سوق العملات الرقمية هذا &#:
وجهة النظر منطقية، خاصة إذا نظرنا للأمر من زاوية الـ market cycle والـ dominance، فتصحيح من 126 ألف إلى هذه المستويات ما زال ضمن نطاق صحي. ضعف أداء العملات البديلة مقارنة بالبيتكوين واضح من إجمالي القيمة السوقية، وهذا يفسر تأخر الـ altseason. شخصيًا أرى أن الشراء التدريجي (DCA) بأموال فائضة يظل خيارًا معقولًا طالما الاتجاه العام طويل المدى لم ينكسر.
هذا توصيف لاتجاهات عامة قد لا يمكن تعني شيئا كثيرا من وجهة نظر اخرى. تقلب حركة السعر لا يمكن ان يكون متوقعا اي لا يمكن محل اي دراسة معقولة. التذبذب في حركة السعر هو دائما عامل لوحده و لان التداول به نوع من المخاطرة فانه من المخاطرة المراهنة على هكذا اشياء مهما كان انوع الاغراءات التوقعات بشأن حركة السعر لا يمكن ان تكون موضوعية ابدا بل هي خلاصة استنتاجات مستخدم واحد.
نعم، السوق لا يمكن التنبؤ به بدقة مطلقة، ولا يوجد نموذج قادر على وصف حركة السعر بنسبة 100%. لكن استخدام أطر عامة مثل market cycles وDCA ليس للتوقع بقدر ما هو لإدارة المخاطر وتخفيف أثر التذبذب مع الوقت. وبالأساس نحن نتعامل مع احتمالات لا يقين، وكل شخص يختار الاستراتيجية التي تناسب تحمّله للمخاطر.
4. Post 66343093 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Wed Jan 28 03:30:19 CET 2026) in أريد خدمة مدفوعة:
ملاحظاتكم بالتأكيد في محلها و ليس هناك اكثر مخاطرة من مشاركة بيانات التسجيل و الادخال مع اي طرف بسبب حساسية تلك البيانات لارتباطها بحسابات شخصية. لكن في نفس الوقت دعونا لا نذهب الى مدى بعيد جدا لان صديقنا يحي ليس ساذجا الى درجة ان يقبل التعامل مع اي عضو او انه سيستعمل بيانات الادخال دون التثبت. الامر ربما اسهل مما قد يعتقد احدكما اذا كان واعيا بكل طبقات الحماية. بمجرد ان يحصل على البريد الالكتروني و كلمة السر خاصته فانه سيقوم بحماية العنوان بجميع وسائل الحماية المعمول بها على قوقل لضمان ان الشخص الذي صنع الحساب لن يتمكن من الولوج اليها مجددا بأي طريقة ثم يرى انت هناك طبقات حماية اضافية على حساب مطور قوقل. بعد التأكد من ان ملكية العنوان الالكتروني و حساب المطور قد انتقلت بالكامل اليه فانه لا ضرر ان يستعمله مطمئنا. ايضا نحن في القسم العربي اعضاء موثوقون نعرف بعضنا و هناك هامش ثقة متبادلة جيد جدا بيننا لذلك استبعد ان يحاول اي عضو نشط ان يتلاعب مع صديقنا يحي.
شكرا لك أخي ، كلامك صحيح تماما وشكرا على الثقة وعلى حسن ظنك بي وبأعضاء القسم العربي
لدي بطاقة افتراضية من طرف redotpay لكنها فارغة للاسف، وعلما اني استخدمها لعدة حسابات من قبل ولم اواجه اي مشكلة مع جوجل والدفع في جوجل باي بشكل عادي
يمكنني انشاء حساب جديد لك واستخدام البطاقة للدفع. لن اخذ اي مقابل منك اريد فقط مساعدتك وهذا اذا اردت شحن البطاقة ربما مع تكاليف الدفع ستكون حوالي 6$ فقط
يمكنك التواصل معي في اي وقت هنا او على التلغرام
ألف شكر لك أخي على المبادرة الطيبة منك، هذا كرم كبير منك
ساتواصل معك في أقرب فرصة إن شاء الله
شكرا لكم جميعا
5. Post 66342952 (unedited backup) (by coinlary) (scraped on Wed Jan 28 01:15:55 CET 2026) in AI scam on Telegram:
I don't think this is enough to know who is your friend you trusted the most to go into a Zoom call or whatever app that you weren't used before.
Check the internet , you will be surprised how much information people drop about themselves every single day.
The case quoted from X platform (ex-Twitter) said that the victim was naive to believe that it's really his friend who invites him to Zoom unless they are used to contact via Zoom.
But what about inviting him to install a plugin or a software? Did he used to accept invitations from his friends to install apps without to verify the source? The victim in this case invited the hacker to steal his sensitive data because of over self-confidence or indifference that this might not happen with a friend. Even if I am 100% confident that I am talking with
Not concerned how the story went, good it didn't left damage, I was only replying to the question "how?"
And yeah, they don't have to be sure it really the closest friend, anyone can be a close friend they aren't familis so there's possible assumptions but for them to have contact through such friend then they must have gotten some infos while running BC.
6. Post 66340384 (unedited backup) (by AnwarKhattabAnwar) (scraped on Tue Jan 27 12:37:26 CET 2026) in كيف استعمل الكتروم:
محفظة الكتروم ليست فقط مخصصة للبيتكوين. هناك محفظة الكتروم لعملة لايتكوين litecoin و هي تعمل بنفس الكفاءة كما مع البيتكوين. محفظة الكتروم تم انشاؤها ربما لتلائم الاحتياجات الاساسية لخصوصية المستخدم لذلك ينصح الجميع بها.
لا اخي، هذا الكلام غير دقيق!
محفظة الكتروم تدعم البيتكوين فقط دون سواه. المحفظة الاخرى التي اشرت اليها و بعض النسخ الاخرى هي مجرد نسخ تم التعديل عليها مثلا لدعم عملات اخرى مثل عملة لايتكوين لكن تم التعديل على الكود الاصلي من قبل مطورين اخرين و ليس من قبل مطوري محفظة الكتروم الاصلية. اعقد ان هذه نقطة مهمة وجب تصحيحها.
بالنسبة لتساؤل صاحب الموضوع حول الرابط الذي وجده، فرغم ان الموضوع قديم نوعا ما الا انه لا يوجد اختلاف كبير في النسخ الجديدة و الخطوات المشروحة فيه مازالت صالحة. فقط تاكد من تحميل اخر نسخة من محفظة الكتروم من الموقع الرسمي.
كلامك في محله، والتوضيح مهم فعلًا لأن كثير ناس تخلط بين Electrum الأصلي والفوركات المبنية عليه. من ناحية OPSEC والأمان، الاعتماد على النسخة الرسمية التي يدعمها الفريق الأصلي يقلّل مخاطر supply chain والتعديلات غير الموثوقة. وبالنسبة للدليل القديم، غالبًا الخطوات الأساسية ما تتغير، بس الأهم دايمًا تحميل آخر إصدار من الموقع الرسمي والتأكد من التواقيع.
7. Post 66340146 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Tue Jan 27 11:18:43 CET 2026) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
Few years ago I started making yearly overview of the local board activity as a way to compare the progress (or regress), and time has come for 2025 overview. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr
Merit Dashboard and BitList.
Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but I hope that's something that will change this year.
Post activity per local board during 2025During the last year, 161066 posts were made across local boards that are part of this overview, which is a considerable 15% decrease compared to 2024 (192417 posts). Its no surprise that Nigerian local board ended up at the top, followed by Russian and Turkish local boards, while at the same time, Romanian, Greek and Polish are once again at the far left part of the chart.
Also, it is obvious from the chart that majority of local boards had decreased activity, while only a few like Nigerian, Pilipinas and Croatian had a decent growth.
Active members per local board during 2025During 2025, 5154 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards, which is negligent decrease compared to 2024's number (5188). Surprising thing though is that Russian board leads this chart and not Nigerian, and by quite some margin.
Local board members per amount of posts during 2025Another chart that shows how many active members each board had during the last year, but this one is more detailed and shows the how many of each type of posters boards have, giving us the better picture of local boards.
So, for example, even though Russian board has double the amount of members that Nigerian board has, the latter has much stronger "core" group of members that wrote 100+ posts during the above mentioned period.
Merit shared per local board during 2025Given the increase of merit sources across local boards, no surprise that almost all local boards had increased number of merit sent, compared to 2024. So, during the last year, 89244 merit was sent, compared to 2024's 75339 merit.
The one that obviously sticks out is Nigerian local that more than doubled the number of merit sent, and Croatian local that had ~150% increase owing it mainly to a few new very active members
Merit/Post ratio per local board during 2025Given the overall decrease of the number of posts written and increase of merit sent, no surprise that average meriit per post ratio during 2025 was 0.55, noticeable increased compared to 2024's 0.42 merit per post.
Percentage of merited posts across local boards during 2025As you can see, differences here are pretty huge, even among the local boards of the similar size. So, Romanian as the least active local board has the highest percentage of merietd posts, while at the same time the 3rd least active local board (Greek) has the lowest percentage of merited posts.
Merit senders and receivers per local board during 2025During the last year, 1385 members sent while 1788 received merit, which is similar to 2024 numbers ( 1337 senders and 1388 receivers). I have to say that I expected much bigger numbers, considering the increase of merit sent.
Merit per transaction across local boards during 2025Its surprising to see Greek board with the highest merit per tx, since they have one of the lowest merit per post ratios. then again, in 2024 they had the highest merit per tx so I guess members there prefer to send merit there in bulk.
The most active members per local board during 2025And for the end of the last year's overview, top 10 active members per local board. For the 4th year in a row leader is joker_josue from Portuguese board with 1948 posts, while 2nd and 3rd spot goes to two members from Russian local, klarki (1704) and Julien_Olynpic (1552). Gj guys, keep it up!
8. Post 66336008 (unedited backup) (by ZaynOsmanAli) (scraped on Mon Jan 26 08:21:43 CET 2026) in منصات المغرب العربي:
كلامك منطقي فعلاً، الأرقام لوحدها ما تعكس الصورة الكاملة بدون ما نحسب عدد السكان. ومع ذلك، وجود الإمارات في الصدارة شيء متوقع مع كل الدعم والبنية التحتية اللي وفروها لهذا المجال.
الامارات في المركز الاول حسب قيمة الاموال المتدفقة و ليس حسب عدد المستخدمين. كما ذكر خالد فان هذا راجع اساسا الى توفير البنية التحتية التكنولوجية القادرة على استيعاب هذه التدفقات بالتضافة الى صياغة التشريعات و القوانين بما يتناسب مع البنية الجديدة. للأسف فان الامارات لزحدها ليست مؤشرا عاما على التطور في المنطقة العربية بالنظر الى حجم التباين بينها و بين الدول في المراتب التي تليها بالمقارنة مع عدد السكان. يعني مصر او المغرب او السعودية يظهر ان لديها نسبة تدفقات تقترب من الامارات لكن لا ننسى عامل حجم التعداد السكاني و الفارق بين اي من تلك الدول مع الامارات.
هذا المقال من موقع اماراتي تقول ان 30% من سكان الامارات يستخدمون العملات المشفرة اي حوالي 3 مليون مستخدم من جملة 11 مليون العدد الجملي للسكان. لك ان تتخيل نفس النسبة في مصر التي يتجاوز عدد سكانها ال100 مليون بكثير.
https://www.emaratalyoum.com/business/local/2025-12-09-1.1995469صحيح كلامك، التفريق بين حجم التدفقات وعدد المستخدمين مهم جدًا، والإمارات حالة خاصة بسبب التشريعات والبنية التحتية مش بالضرورة نموذج يُعمَّم على باقي المنطقة. بالنسبة للمغرب العربي تحديدًا، لحد الآن ما في منصات كبيرة محلية بالكامل بنفس الوزن، لكن في دعم إقليمي عبر منصات مثل Rain وBitOasis، إضافة لاستخدام واسع لمنصات عالمية مع حلول P2P بسبب القيود التنظيمية. باختصار، الطلب موجود، لكن الإطار القانوني هو اللي لسه مقيّد ظهور منصات مغاربية خالصة.
9. Post 66335072 (unedited backup) (by Alphakilo) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 22:46:37 CET 2026) in Comparing slots: myth or reality? :
We came up with the generous idea to develop a tool for comparing slots:
Pragmatic
Novomatic
Haksaw
Amusnet
PlayN'Go
And a lot of other providers are included!
What exactly is being compared here so it will enable us know what the post is about. Are you comparing the RTP of the slot games from the different providers? From the link you provided, you are looking at too many factors with no specifics which makes the entire platform difficult to use. My opinion is that individual should try out as many providers as they can and as many slot games as well to see which one give them better chance of winning and then continue with those games. From my personal experience, Haksaw games have given me more winning than any other slot game which why I play more of their games than those of other providers.
than you can filter by Hacksaw and see on a usual or VIP session what may be the possible outcomes, in case you would be able to validate if the tool actually works , we would be very glad you you post a feedback also here on that
Hacksaw games comparison is here:
https://topcaz.com/compare-slots/eye-of-the-panda-s5583-feel-the-beat-s5520/If it's a one time comparison between different slot providers, what should be the need for a comparison tool like yours? I can't tell if someone will need such a tool unless investors willing to lunch their casino project.
Slot game providers are almost the same with few differences in RTP especially and performance. Gamblers generally use the one that they fell the best regardless of the code behind. They know it's always a matter of pure luck and their choice between them is pointless if luck is missing.
yes, and no, not all the slots are the same, only on very long distance they became more or less the same and reach the same level of RTP, the tool we developed allows the users to see the risk of loss and realistic max win within the short session, and decide weather they want to go all in and try the luck, or have fun and decrease the risk of loss
We are counting multiple factors to give our audience the possible scenarious and allow them to decide what to choose by themselves.
It sounds more like you created an app that categorizes all sort of slot games, instead of a comparison persay.
I don't know why the importance of such development but am sure it would lead somewhere positive and align with whatever purpose you aim to achieve.
However, I think the brilliance in the app is the interface design which is quite simple to navigate and understand. It works more like a tool to aid analysis before venturing into any likely slots games and spurs the gambler who uses this to do more research to understand what some of the terms and figures represent and how it affects their luck when gambling.
10. Post 66335036 (unedited backup) (by topcaz) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 22:35:49 CET 2026) in Comparing slots: myth or reality? :
We came up with the generous idea to develop a tool for comparing slots:
Pragmatic
Novomatic
Haksaw
Amusnet
PlayN'Go
And a lot of other providers are included!
What exactly is being compared here so it will enable us know what the post is about. Are you comparing the RTP of the slot games from the different providers? From the link you provided, you are looking at too many factors with no specifics which makes the entire platform difficult to use. My opinion is that individual should try out as many providers as they can and as many slot games as well to see which one give them better chance of winning and then continue with those games. From my personal experience, Haksaw games have given me more winning than any other slot game which why I play more of their games than those of other providers.
than you can filter by Hacksaw and see on a usual or VIP session what may be the possible outcomes, in case you would be able to validate if the tool actually works , we would be very glad you you post a feedback also here on that
Hacksaw games comparison is here:
https://topcaz.com/compare-slots/eye-of-the-panda-s5583-feel-the-beat-s5520/If it's a one time comparison between different slot providers, what should be the need for a comparison tool like yours? I can't tell if someone will need such a tool unless investors willing to lunch their casino project.
Slot game providers are almost the same with few differences in RTP especially and performance. Gamblers generally use the one that they fell the best regardless of the code behind. They know it's always a matter of pure luck and their choice between them is pointless if luck is missing.
yes, and no, not all the slots are the same, only on very long distance they became more or less the same and reach the same level of RTP, the tool we developed allows the users to see the risk of loss and realistic max win within the short session, and decide weather they want to go all in and try the luck, or have fun and decrease the risk of loss
We are counting multiple factors to give our audience the possible scenarious and allow them to decide what to choose by themselves.
11. Post 66333105 (unedited backup) (by devlin85) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 12:38:01 CET 2026) in can someone help me trace usdt transaction?:
Follow the trace made in the post above. It can help you understand the transaction elements yourself so you won't get confused next time. The most important is that you check the address sent to you by the recipient if it's the same receiver address in the transaction. I hope you didn't made a mistake when withdrawing from stake platform.
Next time, i advice you make withdrawals to your personal address before sending to another recipient. The recipient maybe himself is using a deposit address from an exchange platform or whatever service which maybe flagged the deposit since it came from a casino.
Don't hesitate to share more details here so we can help you.
You took all my words out of my mouth, explained it well :p
12. Post 66331586 (unedited backup) (by Ivystar5) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 21:58:43 CET 2026) in Does Donald Trumps posses potential of influencing bitcoin price?:
Op Trump can't, Only President Trump can! President trump has been doing it already maybe you are not in the internet space l, let me inform you, he has used tarrifs to manipulate the price of assets beyond bitcoin and has also used his influence to drive the price of bitcoin up during his campaign and he was called last year the crypto year and also trump year but that crypto year is what we have seen and is still seeing till now.
He used tariffs as a weapon tool in the global trade war, and like all the products in the market that have been infected by this, bitcoin would also react accordingly. Trump pushed cryptocurrencies to expand to serve his goals. As much as this serves him, he will support it. Not because he is really convinced in cryptocurrencies in general.
Exactly, as long as it helps him launder more money, imhe will be in to support it like never before but today all trump is doing is manipulating he whole market not just for himself but for elite friends too but people are also benefiting from it largely by getting insider information and trade with you, however, trump or the US is not a supporter of crypto no matter what the agenda has been changed to instead they will try and much as possible to exploit it what's why they are trying to bring bitcoin close to the hands of the government so they can do what they want.
13. Post 66326817 (unedited backup) (by Smack That Ace) (scraped on Fri Jan 23 16:22:07 CET 2026) in Donald Trump says 8 European countries will face tax over Greenland:
It can be easily known that you and Kavelj22 are Trump supporters from the United States, and you will both be among the 14% that voted in the United States to support what Trump is doing against Greenland. Just know that you are all bullies.
I do not know if Kavelj22 supports Trump and the US. But I can assure you that I am not an admirer of the US and I am strongly opposed to their authoritarianism.
I do not take sides or defend any superpower because they are all the same. They are all bullies. However, I support the idea of a multipolar world. Because I believe that it will help make the world a better place and create more opportunities for smaller countries, including my own.
Regarding Trump and what he is doing. In the long run, I'm fairly certain that what he is doing will only lead the world to seek to reduce its dependence on the US even further. Thereby, accelerate the formation of a multipolar world sooner
