Yeah, they're one of the few that posts these historical events. I'm also looking for resource but let alone the rep of bitz do the job since it's now part of daily routine.

Yes and congratulations to everyone who's got it.

And while the NBA games are hot, the game of New York Knicks and Cleveland Cavaliers is set to play in the next several hours. I have made a prop bet for the Knicks.

Well as usual those memecoins are just riding the hype and utility coins has been associated with it, but their promotions done still didn't change the fundamentals of those coin.

Somehow market will just eventually filter those shitcoins, Also real value is not about having utility or been called as a meme, but rather if it can solves certain problems and have sustainable demands to investors. If they are just pure hype then it will die down the same as many shitcoins which exist in this space.

كلام صحيح مائة بالمائة. لاحظ ان اكبر مشاريع البنية التحتية خاصة في الدول النامية من الرقات و الموانئ و حتى الجسور و السدود تقوم بتنفيذها شركات صينية. لا يستطيع احد ان ينفي ان الولايت المتحدة هي ايضا قوة عظمة لكنها تحافظ على مكانتها هذه باستعمال القوة و البلطجة و افتعال الحروب في مختلف الاماكن. بينما الصين تكتسب مكانتها بالعمل و هذا هو الفرق.

Your post made me curious to find out the origin & location of their validators. Based on my findings, I found it as follows:

- USDT0 x Luganodes, located in Switzerland
- ValiDAO - located in Iceland
- B-Harvest - located in South Korea
- Meria - located in France
- Kinetiq x Hyperion - located in Australia

Well, that's only 5 out of 24. But still, it's well distributed across continents.

Just open poker client on stake (search poker in casino section). Here is the link to go to poker client directly: https://stake.com/casino/games/poker
Then go to tournament section and you will find this $100k event right.
 


Good luck at the tables.

Using AI to create a text presentation of your business—in this case, your website—is allowed on the forum, even though many people don't like it.


A garbage alleged "review" site which is nothing more than a crap website desperately trying to get referrals.


It's just like that.

Solana is not really a model to follow. The coin is relatively new (2018) but failed to make a strong ATH already in its second (!) cycle (only a handful % above the 2021 ATH). And has lost already 70% in this bear market ($300 down to $89).

The same can be said about Arbitrum. From 0.58$ it fell like a rock all the way down to 0.13$. And Arbitrum is only in its first cycle.

And both coin's tech is not "shiny" and "new" at all. Solana is a simple monolithic PoS coin based on a 1999 algorithm. Arbitrum is still 100% centralized, so can be said there was no progress compared to PayPal (also founded in 1999 ).

Litecoin's fall from $120-30 to about $50-60 in this bear is thus even quite mild (around 55%, not much more than Bitcoin). The problem is that people have the insane spikes from 2018 and 2021 in mind when LTC soared to $200+ but only for a few weeks.

BNB is a company coin, not a real cryptocurrency, so it doesn't count. The only reason why it's mentioned in crypto rankings is because Binance owns Coinmarketcap.

Lol I sound like a LTC shill I'm more a Monero bro, but I will always defend solid and decentralized cryptocurrencies against misinformation spread by centralized shitcoin shills

And with such claim, you will wonder if the content of his site is indeed legit or not. Because if you have been here for years, we already know which sites are scams or not. And if he has scam sites in his site, then, I would say, he didn't do much of his homework, right? So how can you trust his reviews if there are some red flags already in his content?
So the OP should revisit the content of his site because a lot here are long-time gamblers and we already know which ones are legit or not.

شكرا على مشاركة الراط و بالفعل هذه اخبار جيدة. بما ان من كانوا في اتصال مباشر مع المصابين لم تنتقل لهم العدوى فهذ يؤكد ان قدرة الفيروس على الانتقال بين البشر ضعيفة جدا و هذا يحد من خطورته بشكل كبير، رغم ان نسة الوفايات بين المصابين تعتبر مرتفعة.

Privacy on Litecoin is good and all, but most people aren't aware of such feature. Besides, most centralized exchanges don't support LTC-based "Mimblewimble" transactions. It's not enough to help boost Litecoin's market prices over the long term. Developers should've just made Litecoin a Bitcoin sidechain. Or added some smart contracts capabilities into it.

Besides the privacy feature, Litecoin will look like any ordinary cryptocurrency. It's nearly identical to Bitcoin. Why would any investor buy LTC when other altcoins have shiny-new features? These days, it's all about hype. Not real utility. It's this reason why "shitcoins" such as BNB and SOL are at the top. Litecoin will only have a future if there's enough capital flowing into it. Without support from mainstream investors (either retail or institutional), it would be nothing but doomed. We'll see what happens...

أنا أوافق الأخ خالد في كلامه ، أتفهم بالطبع وجهة نظر أخي hugeblack@ بشأن الدعاية وإمكانية أن الشركات تكذب وتضخم قدرات الذكاء الاصطناعي لتسويق منتجاتها لكن كما تفضل الأخ خالد هذه التحذيرات تظهر عن علماء وباحثسن مخضرمين في هذا المجال مثل هذا البحث الذي نتكلم عنه والذي قام به الباحث Daniel Kokotajlo وهو باحث مرموق ومعروف في مجال الذكاء الاصطناعي وشغل عدة مناصب في أكبر شركات الذكاء الاصطناعي ولا أعتقد أنه يقدم بحثه هذا للترويج للذكاء الاصطناعي بل للتحذير منه قبل فوات الأوان.

أتذكر أنه حتى إيلون ماسك الذي كان أكبر المستثمرين في مجال الذكاء الاصطناعي أطلق صرخة تحذيرية وطالب أن يتم إيقاف جميع تطويرات الذكاء الاصطناعي حتى يتم وضع آلية صارمة لهذا المجال قبل أن تفلت الأمور من يد البشرية لأن التطور وصل إلى مراحل مرعبة حتى أنه ذهب بعيدا في مخاوفه لدرجة أنه صرح بأن الذكاء الاصطناعي سيتفوق على البشر قريبا وسيهيمن على ذكاء البشرية بالكامل بحلول 2031 ويغير مستقبل العمل والحياة
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT1D-ubguEY/

في النهاية ربما تكون مخاوف مبالغ فيها فعلا وأن الأمر لن يصل إلى هذه المرحلة والبشر قادرون دائما على السيطرة مهما بلغت درجة تطور الذكاء الاصطناعي لكنها تبقى مخاوف مشروعة يجب أخذها بعين الاعتبار ووضع معايير صارمة لمنع انفلات الأمور عن السيطرة.

The fact that they have to keep the database for at least five years after the company is sold is a legal requirement. I honestly have no idea if they can keep it longer or if they have to destroy it. Maybe someone else will know?

But as you said, it's probably impossible to physically control to who else (besides the new company owner) they might sell the database. It's possible that in the future, it will be secured somehow with smart contracts. Someone should think about it, because it still is wild west.

نعم أخي اللحظة الفارقة والتي قد تبدأ بتشكيل تهديد حقيقي بفقدان السيطرة عندما تبدأ الربوتات بتطوير نفسها بنفسها ، أي تملك القدرة على تطوير برامجها بدون تدخل بشري والجميع يؤكد أننا قريبين جدا من هذه النقطة عندها لا أحد يمكنه أن يضمن ما الذي يمكن أن يطوره الذكاء الاصطناعي وما الصلاحيات التي يمكن أن يعطيها لنفسه بعيدا عن التدخل البشري

أتذكر أنني شاهدت العديد من أفلام الخيال العلمي منذ التسعينات التي كانت تنذر بالخطر وتحذر من هذه اللحظة بالذات ، حيث هناك كثير من الأفلام تتحدث عن فقدان السيطرة على الذكاء الاصطناعي وكيف أنها بدات تطور نفسها لا بل وتطور ربوتات خاضعة لسيطرتها مباشرة وتتحكم بها ، كان هذا في التسعينات يبدو خيال علمي بالفعل وبعيد عن الواقع لكن اليوم نحن قريبين جدا من هذا الخطر إن لم نكن دخلنا فيه بالفعل

The point is that the privacy policy includes a provision we agree to when registering, stating that our data can be sold along with the company. It's just that most people don't realize this.

As for the old owners, AML act imposes an obligation on gambling services to keep KYC data and transaction history for up to 5 years (depending on the licensing jurisdiction).

By the right the old owners of rue casino should not have a copy of the users' information since they have sold the company to a new company, it is the new company should have control on the users' data. The former owners have nothing to do with your information. Or is it for backup purpose?