Kavelj22's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Kavelj22 in the past 7 days

I would not agree (nor would anyone in the West) that the losses of military personnel (if that's what you mean) are equal on both sides - because the attacking side, as a rule, loses far more people than the defending one. Only Ukraine and Russia know the exact figures, but some international studies say that Ukraine lost around 140 000, while Russia lost over 300 000 soldiers.

Really? So how much Americans died in Iraq and Vietnam, compared to local defenders?

We can't only count local defenders in both examples Vietnam and Iraq. The american part is an organized army armed with weapons and reserves and strategies. While the other part is in small scale few armed peopled gathered in small groups (nothing to compare with an organized army), while the total rest is civilians without arms. More than 1 million person killed in Iraq between 2003 and 2009, do you think all of them are defenders? While the number of killed american soldiers in Iraq in the same period is less than 4500 soldiers. Similar rates in Vietnam and in Afghanistan as well.

With Russia and Ukraine, more than 99% of russian victims are soldiers. While a great percentage in the Ukrainian side are civilians. The comparison can't be accurate if one side is always the attacker and the other is always the defender.

Why are you spreading lies and fakes? What "great percentage [victims] in the Ukrainian side are civilians" give us numbers and cite them or delete this propaganda BS!

According to this statistic, The OHCHR verified a total of 57,508 civilian casualties during Russia's invasion of Ukraine as of February 28, 2026. 42,144 of them are people that were reported to have been injured. However, OHCHR specified that the real numbers could be higher. It means more than 15,000 killed which more than 97% of them are civilians. It's easy to check by yourself the comparison with total number of Russians killed in this war. The great majority are soldiers. This is normal because Russia in the attacker part. Check this wiki fyi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_war

How many of those civilian casualties were cause by Ukraine on Russia's controlled territories?

Quote from: Kavelj22 on Today at 05:37:46 PM

Quote from: DaRude on Today at 09:22:08 AM

~

Why are you spreading lies and fakes? What "great percentage [victims] in the Ukrainian side are civilians" give us numbers and cite them or delete this propaganda BS!

According to this statistic, The OHCHR verified a total of 57,508 civilian casualties during Russia's invasion of Ukraine as of February 28, 2026. 42,144 of them are people that were reported to have been injured. However, OHCHR specified that the real numbers could be higher. It means more than 15,000 killed which more than 97% of them are civilians. It's easy to check by yourself the comparison with total number of Russians killed in this war. The great majority are soldiers. This is normal because Russia in the attacker part. Check this wiki fyi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_war

There is a piece of somewhat faulty thinking in what you say.

Russia started this whole thing out as a 'Special Military Operation', not a war, to put down a military-like, terrorist act that the Ukraine government was doing. The US has done this kind of thing around the world... in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, South and Central America, and maybe more. It was formerly called a police action.

Ukraine turned it into a war by not allowing themselves to be policed.

When a nation goes to war, there aren't any civilians. Why not? Because one way or another, all the citizens are supporting the war activity. The whole nation, be it either Russia or Ukraine, is a military war machine. There are no civilians. There are only military personnel in various positions, some of them barely active in the formal war at all.

Since it was Ukraine that started attacking the civilians before there even was a war, members of the Ukraine government turned themselves into terrorists. Then they went big, and turned it into a war. So, it is a Ukraine terrorist-war. The whole nation has volunteered to be terrorists, even if they are not militarily active other than support of Ukraine in various incidental ways. Similar with Russia now that it has become a war.

Big media people who are acting on behalf of the warmongers are the ones who started calling it a war. This is part of what prompted Ukraine to actually turn it into a way. This and the money laundering Ukraine has been doing by using funds that they received for the war to enrich all kinds of people individually, rather than for using it in the war.

Cool

Quote from: bitmover on March 30, 2026, 05:31:07 PM

So many new review services showing up recently!

same with new casinos popping up everyday, everyone wants to get a piece of the cake, lol.

Quote from: Jake_CCAI on Today at 09:18:48 AM

Think once again. Which option will these big companies rather choose:
a) Write 100% objective reviews -> Casinos get pissed off due to just average/bad reviews -> Review sites get only the basic 25% rev share deal. The review sites fear that average/bad reviews don't induce players to click their links -> Not so much affiliate revenue.
b) They write somewhat biased/a lot biased reviews -> Casinos are happy -> Review sites get very lucrative 45-50% rev share deals + CPA deals per each depositing player. -> Visitors click more affiliate links from good reviews -> A LOT OF AFFILIATE INCOME.

Of course no one knows the 100% sure answer for this and the true state may be somewhere between a) and b). And of course, it's a legit question to ask how my site does this. But the only way I can even succeed now in 2026 against these giants is to go fully a).

imo, a) is the better option if you want to build a brand that will be here after many years and have loyal followers.
review sites are supposed to be for the players, to give them the truth with 100% objective reviews, not to bootlick casinos so they can get better deals to make more money on the back of their users.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on Today at 05:02:39 PM

Since you are the owner, do you mind share info about your app monetization and how you are willing to generate profits from it?

it's an affiliate site, so it's monetized by players using their affiliate links to signup on casinos, and depending on the deals they have, they will either be making money from revshare or maybe CPA too.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on March 29, 2026, 09:14:30 PM

Quote from: bitgolden on March 25, 2026, 08:31:24 PM

It's not different today than it was two years ago. When it first came out, notcoin was great because it was basically the first one (or at least first hyped one) where you could do stuff at telegram and automatically be getting rewarded for it, the entire system was new and people loved it.

But looking back on it now, a thousand of those happened since then and it is not a new thing anymore, we shouldn't be shocked about it anymore. I understand the desire for it, but it is not a new thing at all.

Generally speaking, nothing new about another trend hyped by the foolish community like so called memecoins with another wave started with the last two years called AI tokens. What is new is that we have Ton network that can be described as the haven for memecoins developers, if not saying all shitcoins inventors. I doubt that we can find another utility rather than developping memetokens at top of Ton and lunch it in nonsense apps developed at top of telegram. Nice combination imo.

It must be the owners are the ones that hyping it because it was their business and some people are just riding it to benefit as well. In fact, a lot now knows the agenda of them and are now hating them for poisoning the market. They also hate the fact that they have been taken advantage if they invested at them before blindly. But TON is not new anymore.

We are in fact on the age of AI now and the projects under TON like the tap tap game is not being talked about anymore. New trend is the haven of the meme coins but another haven of them must be the Hyper liquid exchange now. TON still have a utility project built on them. One example is the Telegram casinos. Let us only see if there is more to come. So don't lose hope yet.

Time for yet another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time a little bit later than usual as I was travelling and its pain in the ass to do these kind of things on laptop screen alone. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards but are part of this overview nevertheless.

Post activity per local board during February 2026

During February, 12919 posts were written across local boards that are part of the overview, which is a noticeable drop compared to January's 13925. Majority of that drop happened on the most active board, Nigerian, whose numbers went down from 4824 in January to 3924 in February. Despite the drop, they are still by far the most active board, followed by Russian and Turkish.

Active members per local board during February 2026

During the above mentioned period, 1335 members wrote at least one post, which is an expected drop compared to January's 1392. Unsurprisingly, majority of the drop happened on the Nigerian board. It would be ineteresting to hear from someone from their local board (maybe from their local sheriff Igebotz?) what has happened there.

Local board members per amount of posts during February 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only one post in their board during February, leader is Indian board with 50%, while at the same time Croatian local board had only 14% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French board with 52%, while Turkish was at the bottom with 36%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Portuguese board with 50% of such members, while French is at the bottom with only 5% of the members that wrote 10+ posts during last month.

Merit shared per local board during February 2026

During February, 7901 merit was shared across local boards which is a big drop compared to January during which 9717 merit was shared. This time noy only Nigerian board is responisble for such a big drop, but basically all the more active and merited boards as well. Despite the drop, I think those are still pretty good numbers.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during February 2026

As it can be seen on the chart, despite the big drop of merit sent, merit per post ratio remained pretty high. Well, at least on the majorify of the boards, while some like Greek, Bengali, Pilipinas and French are still struggling.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during February 2026

During the last month, 535 members sent while 615 members of local boards received merit, which is expectedly a drop compared to January (633 senders, 725 receivers)

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during February 2026

Once again Romanian board remained at the top of this chart, but this time with more realistic (but still very high) 45% merited posts, while Indian and Italian were just behind them. At the same time we have Greek board which is on par with Off Topic and similar boards.

Merit per transaction across local boards during February 2026

And the last in this series of charts, merit per transaction, that shows meriting habits of local boards.

The most active members per local board during February 2026

Last but not the least in this monthly overview, the list of the most active members per local board. mandown from Turkish local has been the most active member with 132 posts, followed by two member from Russian local, Julien_Olynpic with 121 post and klarki with 119 post. GG guys!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Julien_Olynpic [121]	\|	1. mole0815 [104]	\|	1. mandown [132]	\|	1. gbianchi [63]	\|	1. joker_josue [97]	\|	1. famososMuertos [32]	\|
2. klarki [119]	\|	2. Lakai01 [66]	\|	2. execijutiere [90]	\|	2. Italian Panic [43]	\|	2. TryNinja [38]	\|	2. LUSUBY [32]	\|
3. safar1980 [113]	\|	3. MaxMueller [54]	\|	3. yenerbatmaz [72]	\|	3. fillippone [39]	\|	3. Forsyth Jones [34]	\|	3. Hispo [24]	\|
4. Numeral [102]	\|	4. Real-Duke [51]	\|	4. Hvdv [61]	\|	4. Plutosky [34]	\|	4. alegotardo [33]	\|	4. Don Pedro Dinero [22]	\|
5. xandry [96]	\|	5. Soonandwaite [51]	\|	5. kriminall [60]	\|	5. babo [32]	\|	5. criptoevangelista [33]	\|	5. Porfirii [20]	\|
6. zasad@ [90]	\|	6. cygan [49]	\|	6. Mustang Shelby [57]	\|	6. Ale88 [31]	\|	6. Pumared [30]	\|	6. darxiaomi [15]	\|
7. Alex077 [81]	\|	7. willi9974 [47]	\|	7. Phoenix Anka [56]	\|	7. Paolo.Demidov [29]	\|	7. sabotag3x [27]	\|	7. danadc [13]	\|
8. mak013 [65]	\|	8. Koal-84 [47]	\|	8. MomusReign [52]	\|	8. georgino22222 [20]	\|	8. bitmover [27]	\|	8. Crystal-Trade.org [12]	\|
9. tvplus006 [63]	\|	9. MinoRaiola [47]	\|	9. blomen [51]	\|	9. Ace [15]	\|	9. rdluffy [22]	\|	9. Tete130 [11]	\|
10. internetional [62]	\|	10. Unknown01 [46]	\|	10. lodocus [50]	\|	10. bitcoiner180 [12]	\|	10. mikel_012 [18]	\|	10. btc-marty [10]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [75]	\|	1. rony_btc [14]	\|	1. arwin100 [23]	\|	1. slackovic [48]	\|	1. Jubilee58 [81]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [32]	\|
2. Husna QA [70]	\|	2. winspiral [9]	\|	2. julerz12 [23]	\|	2. katanic97 [36]	\|	2. Floxynice [74]	\|	2. yhiaali3 [26]	\|
3. AakZaki [34]	\|	3. Danydee [8]	\|	3. cryptoaddictchie [23]	\|	3. Daniel91 [29]	\|	3. Africolo [49]	\|	3. khaled0111 [24]	\|
4. taufik123 [33]	\|	4. patrickus [5]	\|	4. Fredomago [21]	\|	4. ovcijisir [25]	\|	4. Cleanshit [48]	\|	4. OmegaStarScream [9]	\|
5. joniboini [31]	\|	5. TryNinja [4]	\|	5. tech30338 [21]	\|	5. cryptofrka [22]	\|	5. Yablee0 [47]	\|	5. RedFlix [7]	\|
6. mu_enrico [31]	\|	6. fpelu [4]	\|	6. bhadz [20]	\|	6. examplens [21]	\|	6. Karl_3000 [45]	\|	6. NotATether [4]	\|
7. masulum [25]	\|	7. oscar2000 [3]	\|	7. xLays [20]	\|	7. Rikafip [21]	\|	7. PremiumcryptoHub [41]	\|	7. GxSTxV [4]	\|
8. Rashlyowl [24]	\|	8. paid2 [3]	\|	8. robelneo [18]	\|	8. Pmalek [18]	\|	8. Crypto_Timothy [41]	\|	8. DireWolfM14 [3]	\|
9. Luzin [23]	\|	9. gaelium [3]	\|	9. coin-investor [18]	\|	9. Trofo [16]	\|	9. Charles-Tim [37]	\|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [3]	\|
10. MAAManda [18]	\|	10. Botchain [3]	\|	10. GreatArkansas [18]	\|	10. dkbit98 [16]	\|	10. Mr Reporter [36]	\|	10. hugeblack [2]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [12]	\|	1. JSRAW [32]	\|	1. cryptosize [36]	\|	1. NeuroticFish [23]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [38]	\|	1. Bd officer [17]	\|
2. pawel7777 [4]	\|	2. Bitcoin Smith [26]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [20]	\|	2. GazetaBitcoin [11]	\|	2. ZAINmalik75 [36]	\|	2. DYING_S0UL [11]	\|
3. TryNinja [4]	\|	3. vivekdhyani1 [22]	\|	3. alani123 [12]	\|	3. Botchain [5]	\|	3. JunaidAzizi [34]	\|	3. Crypto Library [7]	\|
4. kazikbalaganiarz [3]	\|	4. pawanjain [20]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [5]	\|	4. TryNinja [4]	\|	4. MusaPk [20]	\|	4. Shishir99 [7]	\|
5. Judicar [1]	\|	5. TheUltraElite [8]	\|	5. BitcoinsGreece [2]	\|	5. b1ack [3]	\|	5. Rustam Meraj [20]	\|	5. B2Z [3]	\|
6. stwenhao [1]	\|	6. Cointikka [5]	\|	6. whoismeanyway [2]	\|	6. isidor44 [3]	\|	6. HustleZ [18]	\|	6. Hridyansh Labs [2]	\|
7. cryptdar88 [1]	\|	7. henmark [4]	\|	7. WebMonero [2]	\|	7. UsdtBucuresti [2]	\|	7. Faisal2202 [16]	\|	7. Mahiyammahi [2]	\|
	\|	8. IIrik11 [4]	\|	8. bxcxsdfg [1]	\|	8. max2000irc [1]	\|	8. BTC FutureKing [13]	\|	8. Btcloop [1]	\|
	\|	9. M47AK16 [3]	\|		\|	9. othell_rogue [1]	\|	9. Jaweria parveen [13]	\|	9. Comando65 [1]	\|
	\|	10. Rahulkirford [3]	\|		\|	10. Razvan_BTC [1]	\|	10. Publictalk792 [12]	\|	10. Morshedbns [1]	\|

Quote from: Kavelj22 on March 29, 2026, 09:14:30 PM

Generally speaking, nothing new about another trend hyped by the foolish community like so called memecoins with another wave started with the last two years called AI tokens. What is new is that we have Ton network that can be described as the haven for memecoins developers, if not saying all shitcoins inventors. I doubt that we can find another utility rather than developping memetokens at top of Ton and lunch it in nonsense apps developed at top of telegram. Nice combination imo.

When the TON Blockchain was first released, I thought it would be a promising project, built in collaboration with Telegram-CMIWW. I've tried making transactions on the TON network, and I found them to be very smooth and fast. I thought Ton would have many uses and become a competitor to Solana. However, currently, the TON coin is ranked 30th on the CMC and has shown no progress other than being a place to produce meme coins, which I consider completely useless. There's absolutely nothing new about this blockchain. I could say the Ton network is a hidden gem, but given its current development, it seems Ton will become just another useless altcoin.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on March 30, 2026, 03:37:40 PM

Quote from: Branko on March 26, 2026, 10:30:25 AM

Quote from: Lucius on March 24, 2026, 05:09:52 PM

I would not agree (nor would anyone in the West) that the losses of military personnel (if that's what you mean) are equal on both sides - because the attacking side, as a rule, loses far more people than the defending one. Only Ukraine and Russia know the exact figures, but some international studies say that Ukraine lost around 140 000, while Russia lost over 300 000 soldiers.

Really? So how much Americans died in Iraq and Vietnam, compared to local defenders?

We can't only count local defenders in both examples Vietnam and Iraq. The american part is an organized army armed with weapons and reserves and strategies. While the other part is in small scale few armed peopled gathered in small groups (nothing to compare with an organized army), while the total rest is civilians without arms. More than 1 million person killed in Iraq between 2003 and 2009, do you think all of them are defenders? While the number of killed american soldiers in Iraq in the same period is less than 4500 soldiers. Similar rates in Vietnam and in Afghanistan as well.

With Russia and Ukraine, more than 99% of russian victims are soldiers. While a great percentage in the Ukrainian side are civilians. The comparison can't be accurate if one side is always the attacker and the other is always the defender.

Why are you spreading lies and fakes? What "great percentage [victims] in the Ukrainian side are civilians" give us numbers and cite them or delete this propaganda BS!

Quote from: Kavelj22 on March 30, 2026, 05:15:09 PM

...
I didn't check the website but I would like to ask if you are the owner of that website or just using it to publish the reviews.
...

Yes, I am the owner, founder and 100% responsible for all the work on the site.

Thanks all for the comments! Some answers:
- I 100% agree that Stake should rank higher. Also Crypto.games seems to be trustworthy, but it shouldn't rank so high as they lack games, games look horrible and the UI sucks. I probably have a solution for this.
- About review counts, now the site has 8. Writing a review is a time consuming job, as I do all other things to the site also (design, UI, tech-side etc.). So this is more like a long term project. Hopefully in a year there will be 20-25 reviews online.
- I don't write the reviews with AI, if somebody got that impression. I use AI to crawl the sentiment, analyze it with AI and my own brain, and write the reviews myself.

Quote from: Questat on March 30, 2026, 10:35:35 PM

I guess it’s normal. Just like in gambling sites, there are a lot of things being shown, but we’re the ones who decide what to believe. We can’t control what they write, so it’s really up to us to evaluate if it’s something we trust or not. Because whether we like it or not, most of those reviews are biased. The main goal of many of those websites is to monetize once they become popular.

This is the BIG QUESTION in affiliate sites.

I think the recent model is broken. Go to Google and search for "best crypto casinos". The top 10 results are from big crypto companies who have their crypto-side, but they have decided to monetize their site with crypto casino reviews (which I understand). Their domain rating & backlink strength is strong as their other non-casino pages get a lot of links.

All writers of these sites claim to be "casino experts" with 10 years of expertise. The reviews are "verified" by another "casino expert". Guess what, they use a lot of AI directly to write the reviews. Because they have so strong domain rating (DR), Google has a hard time deciding if these reviews should rank or not. Right now, they are ranking pretty good. No one knows how much they really test the casinos.

This story goes further to companies that use Domain Hacking/Buying strategies (they buy an old really strong DR site and build partly or fully AI-generated crypto casino site over that -> ranks well) OR Parasite-SEO strategies (you have probably seen these newspaper domains turning into crypto casino affiliates, or strange Forbes-links with review content). Luckily Google has punished Parasite-SEO sites hard, but Domain Hack/Buy sites still rank very well. There are few of these in the first page of Google for bigger keywords.

Think once again. Which option will these big companies rather choose:
a) Write 100% objective reviews -> Casinos get pissed off due to just average/bad reviews -> Review sites get only the basic 25% rev share deal. The review sites fear that average/bad reviews don't induce players to click their links -> Not so much affiliate revenue.
b) They write somewhat biased/a lot biased reviews -> Casinos are happy -> Review sites get very lucrative 45-50% rev share deals + CPA deals per each depositing player. -> Visitors click more affiliate links from good reviews -> A LOT OF AFFILIATE INCOME.

Of course no one knows the 100% sure answer for this and the true state may be somewhere between a) and b). And of course, it's a legit question to ask how my site does this. But the only way I can even succeed now in 2026 against these giants is to go fully a).

But, this is the world we are now in 2026 for crypto casino review sites.

My project tries to be better than that. Of course it's up to you to decide if you trust "expert reviewers" more than my site. I try to offer an option to those bigger companies, with a lot of player data crunched into a (hopefully trustworthy) review. I will probably add more personal insight to the reviews to balance them out.

But, you all had some great comments and insights about my site. Now I go to code the review model 3.0 which should be a better one.

I'll be back Cool

Quote from: Kavelj22 on Today at 06:51:03 PM

Quote from: Blocino.com on Today at 06:04:11 PM

Please note that your account was reviewed thoroughly by our Risk Management Team, and the decision to ban your account and confiscate funds was based on violations of our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions. These rules apply to all players and are clearly outlined here: https://blocino.com/rules.

What are the rules he has violated in exact? I read the full rules article but found nothing that can validate your decision here but the right permanently ban user's account. Saying "violating rules" is a vague generalized concept. Scammers also say it when they are about to scam somebody.

Quote from: Blocino.com on Today at 06:04:11 PM

You have violated several User agreement including 2.17, which clearly states that we have the rights to ban/block multiple accounts and freely control the assets in such accounts. Hence, point number 8.2 has applied for your accounts.

I read the two clauses 2.17 and 8.2 and nothing about the main reason because of which you decided to ban the user's account. You don''t have to share the user's detail to say what are the rules he broke. He has the right to know.

Quote from: Blocino.com on Today at 06:04:11 PM

Unfortunately, we are not allowed to share user informations in public forums or places. So, we are not able to share detailed informations.

https://gyazo.com/4dfc2533807cca822e7460bec24d3fec this is a screenshot of the email I sent to them on the terms I supposedly "breached".
They are so clasmy with their scam too. They posting me terms that I have NO INFLUENCE ON so there is no way for me to breach them Grin

Anyway the money is not that issue , they look broke af with the site hardly functioning so they can have it but I want NONE of the other bettors here to get scammed the way I did.

Now you have the permission to do it in public. No need for a mediator.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on Today at 03:10:21 PM

بصراحة لا يبدو لي اي من هذه الحلول متاحا للسلطات بقدر احتمالية انهم قد وصلوا فعلا الى احدى المفاتيح الخاصة او مفتاح بذرة احدى المحفظات. اتمام عملية bruteforce بخا احتمالية اخفاق كبيرة جدا و اشك ان تغامر السلطات بتحمل نفقات هكذا مخاطرة. على الاغلب انهم تمكنوا من الوصول لاحدى المفاتيح بطريقة او باخرى او ربما في اطار مساومة و خيروا عدم الافصاح عن الطريقة لسبب او لاخر.

لذا كان مكتب الجرائم الاوربية يوروبول قادر على فك تشفير عناوين بيتكوين و فتح المحفظات بسهولة فان هذا يعتبر كارثة في اسواق المال قد تهوي باسواق الى الحضيض. غ و الا لماذا لم يفتحوا بقية المحفظات على افتراض ان المبلغ الجملي مقسم بينها. اذا لم يكونوا عثروا على المفاتيح بطريقة معينة فانني الغي بالمطلق امكانية ان يكونوا نجحوا في اتمام عملية bruteforce.

لكن ان تم اعتقال صاحب المحفظة بتهمة حيازة المخدرات و حجر ممتلاكته في 2017. كيف يعقل أن يكون هذا الأمر غير عملية bruteforce?
لأنه ان كانت المحفظة بحوزة الشرطة كل هذه السنوات، لقامت بارسالها الى محفظة أخرى خوفا من وصول أي أطراف أخرى للمحفظة عوض ابقائها في نفس المحفظة.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on March 24, 2026, 06:02:55 PM

Quote from: m2017 on March 23, 2026, 05:41:27 AM

I have mixed feelings about this coin: on the one hand, TON is hyping up the platform by leveraging Telegram's reputation, but on the other, within the messenger ecosystem, this coin is useful, which suggests that its value (not only from a financial perspective, but also in terms of its usefulness to users) could increase over time.

All what I can see is Ton hyped by telegram large user base, but what is the real use case gor it? Almost nothing but facilitating the process to create more shitcoins (memecoins in particular). Telegram use to cooperate with Ton blockchain but this doesn't mean it was their only option to integrate a friendly use wallet for payments within the app. As you can see, the wallet actually supports more altcoins to encourage users to use it, but I doubt they swapped their alts to Ton unless those staking memecoins developped at top of Ton.

It's not different today than it was two years ago. When it first came out, notcoin was great because it was basically the first one (or at least first hyped one) where you could do stuff at telegram and automatically be getting rewarded for it, the entire system was new and people loved it.

But looking back on it now, a thousand of those happened since then and it is not a new thing anymore, we shouldn't be shocked about it anymore. I understand the desire for it, but it is not a new thing at all.

Quote from: Kavelj22 on March 24, 2026, 07:44:43 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on March 24, 2026, 07:17:39 PM

Simply, if you don't have the time to bet then don't bet.

But who gambles in a hurry at first place? Let's make clear that all kinds of gambling are not to be played in a hurry because some might think that it's fine to have fun with quick slot fun. In a hurry, the user can mistaken to spend huge amounts in very short time. And sportsbets and table games always require a free tome to think wise before placing a bet.

Unfortunetly, there are players who do this. Mainly addicted gamblers who can't support to wait until be in free time. Gambling not for entertainment can lead to desatrious decisions.

Not only the addicts but people who treat gambling as some kind of job, a source of income, want to utilize every bet, this happens with sports betting and I guess that is what OP also trying to say. I had seen people making bets on the last minute with huge amount because they believe someone told that this is going to be the result so they want to make more money and the worst part is they even take out loans to make such bets and if things goes wrong then they are fucked for sure.