True, I find any gambling project using shillers to promote their casinos to be weird. I'm not saying this casino is into something like that, but I can't imagine, after paying Hero rank and above a fair budget to wear their signatures, any need for bot accounts to start promoting the same project. Using poor and inactive accounts to shill a project only makes the project look less attractive and might harm the reputation of the project.

لا اخي انا ما قصدت اني موافق على هالشي او اشوفه مقبول اخلاقيا، انا بس كنت اوصف الواقع الموجود مو رايي الشخصي فيه، من ناحيتي انا برضو اشوفه تجارة وهم وما فيها اي قيمة حقيقية.

بس فكرتك عن حياد الشبكة هذي فعلا فتحت عيني على زاوية ما كنت منتبه لها، صح شبكة تاخذ رسوم بغض النظر عن محتوى المعاملة زي ما قلت، بس بحس المسؤولية الاخلاقية موجودة ولو بشكل غير مباشر، يعني لو شبكة معينة صارت معروفة انها البيت الرئيسي للاحتيال، برايي القائمين عليها لازم يفكروا بادوات حماية اقل ولو بسيطة، حتى لو ما كانوا مسؤولين قانونيا عن كل مشروع يطلع عليها.

Just an input since I discussed about this on some of my client before after a guy approached him for this kind of services.

Some of this user are selling shilling services to casino that doesn’t know how the trust system works on the forum which means even a red tag account can be look as someone promoting normally.

Good thing that this shill post is easy to distinguish so it’s totally useless to all members that viewing it.

They can buy accounts at high ranks or they can buy merit to rank up, and use such accounts for spamming and shilling but it does not lead to long term safety for their accounts.

Bought accounts can be known, reported, investigated, and banned or locked for security reasons.
Farmed accounts can be known from merit transaction histories and will be red tagged.
Accounts with spamming posts will become useless if they are no longer allowed to wear avatars and signatures with the latest policy of signature bans. With ban periods like 2 years, it will turn such spam accounts to useless.

سؤالك بصراحة يلخص المشكلة كلها، وانا اميل للاحتمال الثاني بصراحة، بس اللي يلفت نظري اكثر مو الميم كوينز نفسها، هي البنية التحتية اللي بنيت عليها، يعني تطبيق زي Pons ممكن يفضل موجود ويربح رسوم حتى لو كل الرموز اللي طلعت عليه انطفت وماتت، لان دخله من عمولة كل عملية مو من قيمة الرمز نفسه.

فممكن تكون الفقاعة نفسها فعلا مصيرها الانفجار زي ما قلت، لكن الي بناها ومستفيد من كل ضجة تصير عليها هذا شغال بمعزل تام عن نجاح او فشل اي رمز محدد.

I agree that it's better to be open about KYC than to apply the No KYC label and leave it in the Terms in a dark place. It's best for players to know what the real policy is before they put money in or play rather than when they want to take money out. I also believe that Power.win took the criticism rightfully. It's better to admit the wording is wrong and correct it.It is better to be wrong than to have to defend something that could lead users astray. Trust takes time to build. And the true measure will be what they actually do with the policies they say in real terms when they are faced with the real players and when they're faced with the real withdrawals. As long as they have that much openness. It can certainly help them build their reputation in the forum.

I agree that it's better to be open about KYC than to apply the No KYC label and leave it in the Terms in a dark place. It's best for players to know what the real policy is before they put money in or play rather than when they want to take money out. I also believe that Power.win took the criticism rightfully. It's better to admit the wording is wrong and correct it.It is better to be wrong than to have to defend something that could lead users astray. Trust takes time to build. And the true measure will be what they actually do with the policies they say in real terms when they are faced with the real players and when they're faced with the real withdrawals. As long as they have that much openness. It can certainly help them build their reputation in the forum.

I love the fact that they are obviously listening to the community and correcting their mistakes to reflect what is obtainable in their platform. I think this is the first casino that is boldly stating it in clear terms their stand on KYC which is good. I know that Rainbet and Duelbits also do not enforce KYC for their players although they can ask for it if they feel it is necessary and this is exactly captured in their TOS. That is how I know a casino that cherishes their integrity. I hope that Power.win follow their footsteps to become one of the biggest casino in the forum.

No point of doing it because our local topic wasn't very active since beginning and with our population there is no potential that it can become more active. From what I see our people prefer to discuss crypto stuff on Telegram, Discord or Facebook groups.
And yes, there is some CEX's operating in our country, so, you can avoid cross-boarder transfers.
I would say that my country is quite crypto friendly, but not when it comes to banks.

Nope, don't always trust information that you found on internet - we use Euro since 2015, not 2025.

هذا الكلام دقيق كتير، انا كمان بشوف ان القرارات السياسية الامريكية بحد ذاتها فئة مختلفة تماما عن الاحداث الجيوسياسية العادية، لان قرار زي رفع فائدة او تغيير بقوانين الضرائب على الكريبتو بيأثر مباشرة على تدفقات السيولة نفسها اللي احنا حاكين عنها، مو مجرد خبر عابر.


هون بختلف معك شوي، انا بشوف انه ممكن يكون "ملاذ" بمعنى مختلف عن الذهب مو بنفس التعريف بالضبط، يعني بدل ما نحاول نلبسه تعريف الذهب الكلاسيكي، ممكن نشوفه كملاذ ضد تراجع قيمة العملات الورقية على المدى الطويل، حتى لو كانت تقلباته اليومية اعلى بكثير.

احتمال استعمال اموال دافعي الضرائب لشراء البيتكوين و تحقيق فكرة ترامب في انشاء احتياطي بمليون قطعة بيتكوين غير وارد تماما.

First of all, thanks everyone for all the feedback. We are reading everything being posted here, and I want to answer the different points properly instead of leaving questions unanswered.

@tyraxx – $1,100 Withdrawal Update

Just to give a final update here:

Your first $1,900 withdrawal was processed extremely quickly and reached you within around 5–10 minutes.

Your following $1,100 withdrawal was then temporarily placed under review because the team needed to complete an additional check on the gameplay connected to the bonus.

We completely understand why that may have seemed strange considering the first $1,900 withdrawal had already been processed successfully.

The good news is that the review has now been completed and the additional $1,100 withdrawal has also been processed successfully. ✅

So both withdrawals have now been handled from our side.

Thanks again for your patience while the second withdrawal was being reviewed, and we appreciate you sharing your experience with the community. 🙏🐵

@Cointxz – iOS / Tablet Menu Issue

Thank you for coming back with the additional information.

Since you're experiencing the exact same problem on Safari, Chrome and Brave on iOS, while other members have confirmed that the menu works correctly on iPhone, Android and desktop, this looks much more likely to be related to the tablet/iOS layout rather than one specific browser.

The fact that you can see the "Collapse left menu" tooltip but cannot actually activate it is especially useful information.

We have reported this so the team can reproduce the tablet resolution/layout specifically. You definitely shouldn't have to zoom the entire website out just to use it properly.

We will get this looked into. 👍

Regarding the Blank Bonus Page

This has also been noted.

If you're clicking the Bonus section and receiving a completely blank page, that's obviously not intended. We're adding this to the issues being checked.

If anyone else experiences the same thing, please mention your device and browser as well. The more examples we have, the easier it is for our team to reproduce the exact problem and fix it.

@AHOYBRAUSE / wawaweewa – Old Balance + VIP Migration

Yes, we're aware that there are still some individual accounts where everything from the old platform hasn't been reflected correctly yet.

Your old balance and, more importantly, your VIP progress should not simply disappear because of the migration.

We're checking these remaining accounts individually. We already transferred the main account data during the migration, but some balances and VIP information still require correction on our side.

And yes, even the legendary 0.10 balance counts. 😂

Regarding Nick not answering since Friday, apologies for that as well. The last few days surrounding the migration have been extremely busy, but that's not an excuse to leave you wondering what is happening.

We'll make sure the remaining migration cases are handled.

DEPOSIT $100 & GET $30 – OFFICIAL WAGERING CLARIFICATION

Let me officially confirm this because a few members have asked and I don't want people having to guess the rules.

Deposit requirement: $100 USD equivalent

Deposit wagering: 1x the deposited amount

The $30 reward itself: No additional wagering requirement

So, for example:

Deposit $100 → wager the required 1x on the $100 deposit → the additional $30 promotional reward does NOT have another wagering requirement attached to it.

Some members already contacted support and received the same answer, but this is the official clarification here in the thread as well. 👍

Which Cryptocurrencies Qualify?

You do NOT have to use USDT.

BTC or any other supported cryptocurrency can be used as long as the deposit meets the required $100 USD equivalent.

Because cryptocurrency prices fluctuate, if you're depositing something like BTC, we recommend depositing slightly above exactly $100 equivalent so a small price movement doesn't leave the received value below the promotion requirement.

@goodpunt – BTC Deposit Error

Thanks for the screenshot.

BTC absolutely qualifies for the promotion, so the error you're receiving when trying to make the BTC deposit is not because BTC is excluded from the promotion.

This appears to be a technical issue with the deposit/cashier side and we're checking it.

Please don't send funds anywhere unless the deposit address/invoice has been generated correctly.

You did the right thing by waiting rather than trying to send anything manually. 👍

@Kavelj22 – Deposit Address Issue & Marketing Suggestion

You actually make a fair point here.

Telling an existing community member "contact support if the deposit address doesn't appear" is one thing. But you're right that a completely new player might simply leave the website instead.

A deposit address failing to appear is therefore something we take seriously. The cashier/deposit flow needs to work without a player needing support to complete a normal deposit.

Regarding your suggestion to pause the signature campaign or temporarily turn it into a review campaign while everything is being polished: we understand the reasoning behind it.

At the same time, we don't want to hide the fact that we're actively developing and improving the new platform.

This was a major migration to an entirely new platform, and while the core migration is complete, there are clearly smaller UI, account, cashier and device-specific issues that we're still finding and fixing.

We're actually very grateful that the BitcoinTalk community is finding these things.

We'd rather have people report them publicly, acknowledge them, fix them and continue improving than pretend everything is perfect.

That doesn't mean we're satisfied with bugs being present. We're not.

Our team is currently going through reported issues one by one, including:

• iOS/tablet responsive layout
• Left-menu collapse issue
• Blank Bonus page
• BTC/deposit-address generation
• Remaining old balance migrations
• Remaining VIP progress migrations
• General UI/UX improvements

Please keep reporting anything else you find — even small visual problems.

Some of the most useful reports we've received from this community have been things that might initially seem small. Fixing all of those details is part of getting the new platform exactly where we want it.

IMPORTANT – CLEAR YOUR CACHE AFTER THE MIGRATION

One final reminder:

If you're still seeing an old version of SCORAS, strange redirects, outdated pages, or something that another member says is already working correctly, please:

Clear your browser cache/history and reload SCORAS.io.

We've had cases where cached data from the previous platform continued showing users outdated parts of the website after the migration.

If clearing your cache doesn't solve the problem, please report it here or contact support and include your device, operating system, browser and a screenshot whenever possible.

THANK YOU BITCOINTALK ❤️

Thanks again to everyone testing the platform, reporting bugs, giving suggestions and challenging us when something isn't clear.

We're not going anywhere.

The migration was a huge step for SCORAS, but it isn't the finish line. We're going to keep fixing things, adding features and improving the platform together with the community.

Keep the feedback coming. 🐵🍌

SCORAS.io

صحيح كلامك بخصوص الخصوصية، بس بشوف الموضوع مو بس عن رصد وصولها لمنصة، حتى لو ما وصلت لمنصة معروفة ممكن تكون انتقلت لسوق OTC وهذا برضو بيأثر على العرض بطريقة غير مباشرة لان في مشتري حقيقي استلم الكمية هاي، بس صعب نشوفه بنفس وضوح تحويلة لمنصة تداول عادية.


نقطة ممتازة صراحة ما كنت منتبه لها، لو كان الهدف امني بحت كان المفروض ينقلوا كل المحفظة دفعة وحدة مو يجربوا بمبالغ صغيرة، هذا فعلا يخلي احتمال البيع او التجربة اقوى من احتمال الحماية من الاختراقات.

كلامك منطقي كتير وخلاني افكر بالموضوع من زاوية تانية، بس بحس في نقطة مهمة ما نتطرقلها وهي ان تدفقات صناديق الاستثمار المتداولة صارت اليوم لاعب اساسي بتحديد رد فعل السعر اكثر من أي وقت مضى، يعني حتى لو صار حدث جيوسياسي كبير، اذا المؤسسات مستمرة بالشراء عن طريق هالصناديق فراح يمتص أي بيع خوفي من المتداولين الافراد وبالتالي السعر ما بيتحرك كتير مهما كانت الاخبار مخيفة.

فأنا اميل اكثر لفكرة انه مو بالضرورة تغير بطبيعة البيتكوين نفسه، بقد ما هو تغير بهيكلية من يملك ويحرك السوق حاليا، صار فيه لاعبين كبار بمراكز طويلة المدى ما بيتأثروا بأخبار يومية زي ما كان يصير قبل سنتين او ثلاثة لما كان اغلب الحجم للمتداولين الافراد.

Danke Dir für das monatliche Resümee! Als nächstes wäre dann eine Qualitative Auswertung der lokalen Boards ganz interessant, auch wenn das wiederum subjektive Ermessenssache wäre... 


Bei Platz 6. muss man aber aber jetzt noch keine Rede halten oder? 

Weiter fand ich persönlich auch noch diesen Teil vom [CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity ) super interessant, einfach um die Neugier "Wer ist denn so woher oder wo evt. beheimatet?" zu befriedigen und auch mal eine Übersicht zu haben, welche Accounts so mutmaßlich aus welchen Ländern kommen, ist denen Accounts ja schließlich nicht auf die Stirn tätowiert... 

Thanks for sharing your opinion. We understand your point, but we’ve already clarified what No KYC means at Reels.io and under which exceptional circumstances verification may be required. We don’t hide these conditions — they are clearly stated in our Terms.

We respect that some members of the community may define “No KYC” differently, but we prefer to be transparent about how our platform actually operates

Thank you for sharing your experience, and we're glad the previous $1,900 withdrawal reached you so quickly. 🙏

Just a quick update from our side as well: I can currently see that you have another $1,100 withdrawal pending.

The team is reviewing the gameplay connected to the bonus on the account before approving this withdrawal. This is a standard review to make sure the bonus conditions and gameplay are all in order, and it shouldn't take long.

As soon as the team has completed the review, they'll proceed accordingly with the withdrawal.

Thanks for your patience, and we'll try to get this handled as quickly as possible. 👍🐵


Thanks for the feedback!

Regarding the exact currency/network used for that withdrawal, I'll leave that confirmation to tyraxx since we don't want to guess on his behalf.

We're obviously very happy to hear that his previous $1,900 withdrawal arrived within around 5–10 minutes. ⚡

Regarding the deposit address issue, thank you for reporting it. We're still fixing and optimizing smaller issues following the migration.

If you select a cryptocurrency/network and the deposit address doesn't appear correctly, please contact our support before sending anything so we can check it.

The suggestion regarding Google/social registration is also noted. 👍

We're collecting these smaller suggestions because now that the major migration is completed, improving the overall user experience is one of our priorities.


Thank you very much for the kind words. ❤️

We definitely had issues in the beginning, and even after this major migration there are still things we're improving. We've never tried to pretend everything is perfect.

What matters to us is that when someone reports a legitimate problem or gives us a good suggestion, we actually look at it and try to do something about it.

And regarding the signature campaign, we actually encourage everyone participating to speak naturally. You don't have to praise SCORAS just because you're wearing our signature.

If something is good, say it.
If something is bad, say it.
If something is broken, definitely tell us. 😂

We would much rather have genuine community feedback than artificial hype.

Thanks for being part of the journey with us. 🐵🍌


Completely fair point, and we actually agree with you.

We don't want anyone artificially hyping SCORAS simply because they're participating in our campaign.

Please post naturally.

Ultimately, it's our responsibility as the operator to earn people's trust through withdrawals, support, improvements, promotions and how we handle problems — not through people simply saying we're amazing.

We're happy that you've noticed the work and updates we've been making so far.

We still have plenty more to improve, and we'll keep working on it. 👍🐵


Thank you, we really appreciate this. ❤️

It has definitely been a pretty crazy few weeks for us. 😂

We've made a major platform migration, introduced new features, worked through bugs, listened to suggestions here and made changes based directly on community feedback.

There are still things we're working on and there will definitely be more improvements coming.

One thing we want to continue doing is actually listening when this community points something out. Some of the best feedback we've received since launching here has come directly from BitcoinTalk members.

So please keep the criticism, bug reports and ideas coming.

We're only getting started. 🐵🍌


Yes! 😄

BTC is absolutely fine for the promotion. ✅

You don't specifically need to deposit USDT.

You can use BTC or another cryptocurrency supported by SCORAS as long as the value of the deposit meets the required $100 USD equivalent for the promotion.

So if your USDT has mysteriously disappeared somewhere 😂, BTC will do the job perfectly fine.

Good luck with the Games & Rounds promotion! 🍀🐵


Correct. 👍

Just confirming this officially from our side:

BTC is accepted for the $100 deposit promotion.

The requirement is based on the USD value of the deposit, not specifically on depositing USDT.

Users can participate with BTC or another supported cryptocurrency as long as the deposit meets the required $100 USD equivalent.

Thanks for helping answer the question before we got here. 😄🐵


Exactly right. 👍

Just giving the official confirmation so there is no uncertainty:

BTC is accepted. ✅

The promotion isn't restricted to USDT. The important requirement is that the deposit reaches the required $100 USD equivalent.

Any cryptocurrency supported for deposits on SCORAS can be used for the promotion.

Thanks for jumping in and helping clarify it. 🐵🍌

And finally, thank you everyone for the continued feedback. ❤️

We read this thread, including the criticism. We don't expect everyone to agree with everything we do, and we certainly don't expect people to praise us just because they're participating in one of our campaigns.

Keep reporting bugs.
Keep suggesting features.
Keep telling us where we can improve.

A lot has changed at SCORAS in only a few weeks, and there is still a lot more we want to do.

Thank you for being part of it. 🐵🍌

— SCORAS.io Team

Its time for yet another brief overview of local boards activity, and I am so late that I am literally writing this from hotel room, few hours before I have to check out and fly back home (otherwise I won't have time to do it before month ends).  All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during July 2026

During above mentioned period, 13928 posts were made across local boards, which is a small increase compared to June (13659). Top 5 most active boards remained almost the same as month before, with only Pakistan and German locals changing spots.

---

Active members per local board during July 2026

During July, 1298 members wrote at least one post across one of the local boards, and is yet again small increase  compared to June, during which 1290 members were active. Like in previous chart, there's no much change among the most active boards, with Nigerian remaining far ahead the others.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during July 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leaders are Romanian and Indian boards with 50%, while Pakistan had only 3% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket, leader is Polish board with 60%, while Turkish local board had only 20%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Turkish board with 52%, while French board (once again) had no members in that bracket.

---

Merit shared per local board during July 2026

During July, 5818 merit was sent across local boards that are part of this overview, and is a bog drop compared to June's numbers (6573). Majorify of this drop happened on German board, that went from 1267 merit sent in June to 612 in July. These kind of fluctuations aren't strange fro them, so I wouldn't be surprised if they go back to their old numbers.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during July 2026

During July, average merit per post ratio across local boards was 0.42, which is a drop compared to June's 0.48 merit per post. Italian board remained at the top, but what is noticeable that majority of local boards had lower July's ratio, compared to 12 month average.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during July 2026

During July, 509 members sent while 588 received merit, which is a small decrease compared to month before (525 senders, 601 receiver).

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during July 2026

Romanian board remained at the top of this chart, with Italian board right behind them, while others are a little bit further behind.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during July 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that gives more info on meriting habits of each local board. Having said that, it can be very deceiving as Greek board is at the top with basically having only 1 merit transaction during July.

---

The most active members per local board during July 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. Once again joker_josue from Portuguese board is at the top, folloed by chickito from Indonesian and Numeral from Russian local boards. GG guys!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Numeral [137]	|	1. mole0815 [72]	|	1. mandown [109]	|	1. babo [42]	|	1. joker_josue [139]	|	1. Filicius [37]	|
2. jokers10 [130]	|	2. Lakai01 [72]	|	2. Valcendier [81]	|	2. Italian Panic [42]	|	2. sabotag3x [98]	|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	|
3. klarki [116]	|	3. Soonandwaite [63]	|	3. yenerbatmaz [66]	|	3. fillippone [38]	|	3. bitmover [61]	|	3. darbitmobilerecovery [22]	|
4. safar1980 [105]	|	4. MinoRaiola [59]	|	4. MK-74 [61]	|	4. Ale88 [32]	|	4. alegotardo [53]	|	4. famososMuertos [19]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [96]	|	5. MaxMueller [55]	|	5. RaltcoinsB [60]	|	5. Plutosky [28]	|	5. TryNinja [43]	|	5. darxiaomi [15]	|
6. internetional [78]	|	6. jahead [51]	|	6. Mustang Shelby [58]	|	6. Ultimo2 [22]	|	6. Forsyth Jones [38]	|	6. Marmeladka.cc [13]	|
7. dwyane36 [63]	|	7. Real-Duke [48]	|	7. Hvdv [57]	|	7. alexrossi [21]	|	7. criptoevangelista [31]	|	7. Porfirii [10]	|
8. Alex077 [60]	|	8. cygan [40]	|	8. kriminall [54]	|	8. gbianchi [19]	|	8. rdluffy [29]	|	8. thesebassv [10]	|
9. xandry [52]	|	9. Unknown01 [34]	|	9. Phoenix Anka [54]	|	9. Brcbrc [16]	|	9. alexrossi [28]	|	9. GazetaBitcoin [9]	|
10. zasad@ [49]	|	10. 5tift [31]	|	10. Xyloo [53]	|	10. rtx10 [14]	|	10. Pumared [21]	|	10. Allo-obmen [9]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [138]	|	1. BinaryWizard [8]	|	1. Peanutswar [41]	|	1. Daniel91 [40]	|	1. Floxynice [75]	|	1. khaled0111 [34]	|
2. joniboini [51]	|	2. winspiral [6]	|	2. Asuspawer09 [37]	|	2. slackovic [34]	|	2. Charles-Tim [54]	|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	|
3. taufik123 [47]	|	3. Danydee [5]	|	3. tech30338 [37]	|	3. katanic97 [32]	|	3. Africolo [54]	|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	|
4. Luzin [39]	|	4. Perosy [5]	|	4. arwin100 [30]	|	4. Rikafip [31]	|	4. TrialBitcoin [51]	|	4. OmegaStarScream [15]	|
5. Husna QA [37]	|	5. TryNinja [3]	|	5. blockman [29]	|	5. Pmalek [26]	|	5. Mayor of ogba [46]	|	5. GxSTxV [10]	|
6. AakZaki [34]	|	6. DenisDenis [2]	|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	|	6. ovcijisir [22]	|	6. CryptopreneurBrainboss [42]	|	6. hugeblack [6]	|
7. mu_enrico [34]	|	7. Halab [2]	|	7. bhadz [23]	|	7. dkbit98 [15]	|	7. Tetu100 [42]	|	7. aseemhamza [5]	|
8. kawetsriyanto [32]	|	8. EXMON [2]	|	8. cryptoaddictchie [23]	|	8. cryptofrka [14]	|	8. Yablee0 [41]	|	8. Xmors [3]	|
9. masulum [24]	|	9. genius89 [2]	|	9. fighter2627 [23]	|	9. examplens [13]	|	9. Agbamoni [40]	|	9. lastpixellive [2]	|
10. salad daging [16]	|	10. lastpixellive [2]	|	10. coin-investor [22]	|	10. BitGoba [12]	|	10. Plutomanian [39]	|	10. nexguard [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [19]	|	1. Cointikka [34]	|	1. cryptosize [31]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [51]	|	1. Bd officer [19]	|
2. pawel7777 [4]	|	2. JSRAW [33]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [22]	|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	|	2. Bityar [42]	|	2. Review Master [13]	|
3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [28]	|	3. Conqueror777 [9]	|	3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Junii [39]	|	3. Shishir99 [11]	|
4. EXMON [2]	|	4. eaLiTy [27]	|	4. alani123 [3]	|	4. lastpixellive [2]	|	4. JunaidAzizi [38]	|	4. NNRR [8]	|
5. lastpixellive [1]	|	5. pawanjain [19]	|	5. Makis Kotzampasis [2]	|	5. jedaite [1]	|	5. Sawera2255@ [38]	|	5. Crypto Library [8]	|
6.	|	6. GazetaBitcoin [9]	|	6. Ultegra134 [1]	|	6. daniosem [1]	|	6. Abdul Sami786 [34]	|	6. Z_MBFM [8]	|
7.	|	7. vivekdhyani1 [4]	|	7. lastpixellive [1]	|	7. b1ack [1]	|	7. Nmjut [30]	|	7. Nothingtodo [7]	|
8.	|	8. weallbitcoiners [4]	|	8.	|	8. nexguard [1]	|	8. HustleZ [29]	|	8. DYING_S0UL [7]	|
9.	|	9. Nrcewker [3]	|	9.	|	9.	|	9. Fragrance1122 [29]	|	9. Tiger096 [4]	|
10.	|	10. TheUltraElite [3]	|	10.	|	10.	|	10. snowpega [27]	|	10. Murat [2]	|

I have accepted your loan request and sent USDT to your wallet. Please check your account balance. Please repay on or before the due date to TFn3i5U1MTVRJ1KubzsFto4RcZgA7WEAFS

---

I am confirming the receipt and extended the loan for another month. The new repayment amount should be 0.002062027 btc, which should be repaid on or before 29th September 2026.

This is one of the saddest part here. Usually many of their victims just decide to move on, because they don't want to undergo those hassle process and just want to just continue to their natural activities on other casino.

With this many scams like them can get away with the consequences and those few people have huge balance left. Usually starting to lose their morale seeing there are only few people fighting to get their refunds from those platform which scams them.

Lesson to learn from those scams is not to put huge funds on any casinos, to avoid experiencing same problems once the reputable casino we know suddenly pull another scam.