For a total newbie both to investing and cryptocurrency, asking them to do some research is more like preventing them from utilizing good opportunities. When I didn't understand these scams, I engaged in a scam called "Million money" built on Ethereum, I was warned but I got my eyes fixed on the profits and lost woefully, only then did I learn my lessons.

Fast forward to 2025, I was warning my sister that "CBEX" was scam and their licenses displayed on their page was fake, I even showed her reviews but she didn't listen, in fact she stopped discussing her investments with me and labelled me as bad luck. She only got wiser after loosing $2500 to them.

I feel most newbies are just like that and only take proper researching and rational thinking very seriously when they've been burned. We only hope that what burns beginners wouldn't be so much that would swallow up all their finances and starting all becomes near impossible, although with determination and desire to get back up, one can always start afresh.

If they're not backed by the government, then it's not worth holding onto them for the long-term. This new OpenUSD stablecoin aims to bring a lot of buzz to the crypto industry. But with established players in the scene, it's hard to believe it will take off anytime soon. Not even PayPal's USD stablecoin (PYUSD) has succeded.

Based on the path the Trump administration is taking, it seems to me that USD-based stablecoins will become the de-facto "Digital Dollar" of the nation. Only time will tell. Either way, USD stablecoins are way ahead in the game. Where does that leave EUR stablecoins? Alone, dusting in the corner. Just my two sats.

Does anyone know what is the content of this lawsuit ?

Have the creators of the coin promised something that did not happen ?

I believe it's not a problem with the volunteer moderator, but a problem of the official representative being visible. It's great if a member of the community can help by forwarding complaints, particularly if they already have a contact with the team. The issue is that the user relies on that volunteer and the official representative is not usually there. Every ANN thread should be given someone who is officially responsible to answer questions, update the thread and follow up on cases that have not been resolved. Volunteers can be a valuable link but may not be the main link. If that is the case. It appears that the casino isn't devoting enough attention to its own community support.

أوافق ما قاله الأخ Kavelj22 من السوق تخضع للرقابة ليس الداخلية لكن الدولية لأن سوريا رغم رفع العقوبات لم يتم رفعها من قائمة الدول الداعمة للإرهاب رغم أن الرئيس ترامب وعد الرئيس الشرع أن يتم إزالتها خلال شهرين أو ثلاثة ولكن يبدو أن ذلك مرتبط بشروط أمريكية على سوريا ولانعرف ما هي التنازلات التي ستقدمها

لذلك حتى الآن هناك رقابة وكذلك الكثير من الفصائل الموجودة في سوريا لاتزال تصنف إرهابية ولذلك فهناك الكثير من الخدمات التي لم ترفع الحظر عن سوريا وأبرزها خدمات جوجل المتنوعة وكذلك شركات الدفع العالمية مثل فيزا وماستر كارد وبايبال

1win really hard a good run in terms if the promotions in most aspects of it, their did touched all categories of promotions in the forum, this earn them the presence and visibility they have gained here on bitcointalk,.

Allowing the end of their signatures campaign, to make the ANN inactive is not good at least we have some other casinos whose signatures and other promotions ended long ago but yet their mentain a close connection with their community members and actively solving their issues.

I employ  🔵1win team to put in the same efforts to keep the ANN thread active and in a positive light as always.

Not sure if it's riskier than paper USD since it pretty much has the same backers (big banks), and surely it's not just a correlation, but the stablecoin represents a 1:1 peg to the actual dollar.

I think the threat is about using cryptocurrency as a means of payment as we thought before, since they mainly use the technology to issue fiat on top of the chain. Gone is the dream that we pay in, let's say, 10 cryptocoins (whatever they may be).

But there's no threat to crypto as a store-of-value thing.

The reputation of a casino is important not just in terms of its promotions but also after the campaigns have ended. If details of the case cannot be shared because of privacy concerns, brief updates regarding the current or resolved cases demonstrate that reports are placed on the agenda. There is also transparency that is important for people assisting users in disputes. Whether they are acting on behalf of the organisation. Or just helping out. This should be communicated. It is crucial to have an open and consistent communication to keep the trust and credibility in Bitcointalk community alive.

In several cases they usually hire those people which contribute a lot on their thread, also with those active people helping them to solve those concerns of people.

This is provably the reason why they hire someone from here to moderate this thread. This indicates that they are still seriously paying attention on what might going to happen in this thread.

But maybe in future they come back and launch their signature campaign again.

Why will Trump invested in it when he is the owner of the coin? I intentionally did not include his wife. They created a tokens, they told people to buy it. They do not need to buy the toeken they created. All they need is for people to think that the tojens are different, that it belongs ti Trump family and they will continue buying, but Trump will dump it hard just like other meme coins developers and the price crashed.

Representatives of casinos in this forum can be the owner, the team members or a community manager from their companies, sometimes they hire someone as an outsource to post an announcement thread but it's not this case.

1win has their official representative from their own company as far as we knew from this announcement thread, so after their marketing programs ended, and likely any contracts with signature campaign manager or community manager outsourced ended, it's time for their official representative to handle this thread and communicate with community.

It's a right thing to do if they still want to be here, advertise their brand here, and I agree with your opinion.

I was the campaign participant and was asked to moderate the thread and after the end of the campaign, if there are issue here, I can still forward them to 1win team. That is my position here. Is that clear now. If I see complains here, I will call the attention of 1win support team.

اشكرك على الرد الايجابي والجواب على تساؤلي، فعلا في الحظر الذي حدث سابقا فقد توصلت بعدة رسائل الى الايميل الخاص بي بفترة طويلة قبل ان يقوموا بالحظر النهائي وتحصلت على الوقت الكافي لسحب اصولي من المنصة وهذا طبعا شيء ايجابي، ومن الطبيعي ان حجم المنصة ايضا ليس بالصغير وعدد المستخدمين يشكل جزء كبير من السوق في الكريبتو وهذا مفروغ منه

حسب رايك اخي الفاضل فان سيطرة بايننس على السوق فعلا ليس بالامر الجيد لنا جميعا وهذا يشكل خطر كبير اذا ما قدر الله وصارت مشكلة في المنصة، لكن الاشكال الان اكبر من ذلك، فنحن بالذات كجزائريين فان مجتمعنا الخاص بالكريبتو كاملا يتعامل بنسبة اقرب من ١٠٠% على منصة باينسس عن طريق P2P ولا ارى في المستقل القريب اي منصة سوف توفر عرضا افضل او خدمة افضل من باينسس لان عمولتها جيدة وصغيرة جدا ولها فريق جيد في التعامل مع حالات محاولة نصب بكل دقة وسرعة مما يجعل الامر اكثر صعوبة للانتقال الى منصة اخرى

Are you surprised to see that? It is just strange to see a 1win moderator not wearing the signature of the campaign he is promoting and if he get accepted in another campaign, he will be doing his work which shows that it's a volunteer work and I don't think anyone assigned the work of a moderator to him. There is nothing wrong when you channel a complain to a casino team which is never a a sign of your responsibility to be doing that often. The casino representative can get updates from the campaign manager about users complains on the forum if they are not here often.

Regardless of the dangers, some casinos had a 0-confirmation deposit system. Even if there are a few cheaters, they would be removed from the site the first time they try something like that.

Regarding bumping the fee of bitcoin transactions. If you use RBF to increase the fee, you are creating a replacement transaction with a new transaction ID. The original transaction with the old transaction ID becomes invalid and non-existent. That would also invalidate whatever amount you won. You wouldn't be able to withdraw it because the system would consider that the initial deposit was never confirmed and never credited to your account. At last that's how I believe it is. 


I don't play there anymore, so I don't know. I did ask their AI support agent, and it claims that the site still supports 0-confirmation Bitcoin transactions.


If the deposit takes too long to be credited to my account and I miss the opportunity to submit my last-minute bet, I would probably go elsewhere the next time I want to gamble. Something even worse than that is if the casino causes issues with withdrawals and/or charges an unreasonable fee.

I don't claim welcome bonuses because of the wagering requirements and other terms connected to them.

It's not a deal-breaker if I feel the site acts honestly. A license does not equal trust and vice versa but it can be. I am sure there are players who would feel more comfortable with seeing a seal of authentication, though.

Thank you all for your responses and support — OrangeFren, Kavelj22, and everyone else who took the time.

I understand the situation better now. I'm just going to wait for GhostSwap to actually do something. They have my funds, they know the proposal, and they know what needs to be done. I hope they make the right choice soon.

I'll keep this thread updated if anything changes.

I am not a representative but the moderator of the thread and forward complains to the support team to look into the matter and resolved.

وصلني الايميل ايضا بعدما كنت مستخدما للمنصة و اان يطلبون التحقق من الحسابات للدول التي فك حظرهم. اتفق مع  الاخ Kavelj22 واعتقد ان توسع OKX في المنطقة العربية قد يكون احد الاسباب، لكن بالنسبة لي حتى لو رفعوا الحظر فلن اعود لاستخدام المنصة لانه امر مزعج واغلب الضن انهم سيستهدفون عملاء جدد وليس القدامى لاننا راينا بالفعل عيوب المنصة، قد يكون قرارهم فعلا مرتبط بالتوسع كما ذكرت، لكن كان من الافضل لو تعاملوا مع المستخدمين بشفافية منذ البداية بدل تغيير السياسة بهذه الطريقة

في المنظور او الجهة الاخرى فان ما قامت به الشركة ربما كان الخيار الوحيد لها تحت الضغوطات او اوامر سياسية، كل ما هو مركزي هو تحت رقابة جهات حكومية ولا يمكن انتهاك قوانينهم

Can you expatiate what mean by 1win seems to join them? I am still taking complains to them to solve and I have directed the said guy to them the appropriate headquarters to address his issue. And currently I am busy addressing issue behind the scene. Someone requested for his account to be blocked permanently and 1win did what he requested for and right now the guy said he didn't requested for it. 1win said they would not blocked account if the owner did request for it. So the case is complicated for me as well. If anyone has issue PM me with all the details and I will forward it to them.

Well, CBDCs don't need a Blockchain. They can simply live on a centralized database where only central banks and governments can control. If governments are keen on using Blockchain tech, they can make their very own sidechain operating on top of an existing public Blockchain network. All without losing power/control. CBDCs will simply rely on the security of existing Blockchain networks, while retaining its permissioned nature.

People don't care whenever CBDCs become the new norm or not. All they want is convenience. As long as they're able to pay for things using Fiat, nothing else matters. I'd expect CBDCs to replace credit/debit cards. Just you wait and see.

We could really see that those issues happen to some users unintentionally and we could see that its not actually players fault if they made a mistake, because sometimes TOS of casinos is actually confusing.

If they just address those matter on first place and write that its fine to use VPN, for sure that people will easily understand and know what to do with those matters. This is really the reason why I don't like to use VPN since maybe this might be used against us.



This is great confirmation and thank you Rizzy for this clarification.

It shouldn't be like this. I think, a great team like 1win can understand the importance of being presented on this forum. It's like for scientists being published in Nature - everyone knows that it won't hurt. I'm saying "a great team" because I'm sure only great team could create such a great site. Playing poker on it every day. It's amazing!