Last update: 2026-05-06_Wed_22.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Kavelj22 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Kavelj22
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Kavelj22" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66696336 (unedited backup) (by passwordnow) (scraped on Wed May 6 22:19:25 CEST 2026) in Are there any ETHEREUM Pre-Sale Participants on BitcoinTalk?:
Keep in mind that the address will be used only as a memorabilia,and you’ll still have access to it (private keys cannot be changed)
For sure? we don't believe. You'll probably going to take the most of the airdrops that haven't been taken by the owners of it. Oh well, why would I care, I don't even have it and missed the ICO pre sale of Ethereum. Lucky are those who got it if OP's offer here is for real.
Never heard about airdrops dedicated to early eth addresses. Can you mention some of them if you mind?
There are the likes of Omisego(OMG) although I don't know what happened to this project right now. But early address received like for every 1 ETH is close to its quantity.
If this is for real, the buyer will check the eligibility of the address for the airdrop which will determine its price. In the other hand, I don't think old eth pre-sale investors aren't aware of those airdrops if they are not already rich enough to not follow these offers for some hundreds dollars. Who the genuine to buy crypto addresses as collectibles, unless he intends to use it for another purpose.
He might be for real about having it like a collectors item. But there are tools or websites now that checks the eligible airdrops that can have for each of those old addresses.
2. Post 66694854 (unedited backup) (by Questat) (scraped on Wed May 6 15:08:55 CEST 2026) in 🟣 Plump.com | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | VIP Bonuses:
My advice to everybody visiting this topic, Stay Away from plump casino until more clarifications.
Indeed, for now until there is further update, member better avoid depositing to this platform. Moreover now plump thread both title and OP content already deleted, this is probably they are trying to stop their business or something bad happens with their platform. I hope no member have much money left inside the platform. Very sad actually, even though they can make more money with maintain their good services compared to act like this.
Or maybe they deleted the thread content so there will be no evidence left. Whatever their reason is, this already looks like an obvious exit scam to me.
If they were really honest, they would announce their situation properly. That is normal in any business, sometimes it succeeds, sometimes it fails, but at least they should give an update. The fact that there is no word from them makes it look like this was already planned from the very start.
Based on what I have seen, there are already two casinos that ran a campaign in the forum and later turned out to be a scam. So it is really hard to trust new casinos here.
To minimize the risk, just deposit a small amount first, not something that will hurt us if things like this happen. Too bad the casino is still active, because people who have not read this kind of warning might still fall victim.
3. Post 66694731 (unedited backup) (by masulum) (scraped on Wed May 6 14:28:26 CEST 2026) in 🟣 Plump.com | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | VIP Bonuses:
My advice to everybody visiting this topic, Stay Away from plump casino until more clarifications.
Indeed, for now until there is further update, member better avoid depositing to this platform. Moreover now plump thread both title and OP content already deleted, this is probably they are trying to stop their business or something bad happens with their platform. I hope no member have much money left inside the platform. Very sad actually, even though they can make more money with maintain their good services compared to act like this.
4. Post 66694289 (unedited backup) (by GazetaBitcoin) (scraped on Wed May 6 11:23:44 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Info for:
Kavelj22 | dansus021 | DYING_S0UL | cygan | Porfirii | ovcijisir | Chilwell | JunaidAzizi | Peanutswar | zasad@ | GazetaBitcoin | mindrust
New statistical data from TalkImg has been published. You will be able to share it in the topic you translated. Thanks.
Thanks once more for the heads-up, joker_josue

I just updated the
Romanian translation.
5. Post 66692589 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Tue May 5 21:26:43 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Statistics April 2026____________________Info for:
Kavelj22 | dansus021 | DYING_S0UL | cygan | Porfirii | ovcijisir | Chilwell | JunaidAzizi | Peanutswar | zasad@ | GazetaBitcoin | mindrust
New statistical data from TalkImg has been published. You will be able to share it in the topic you translated. Thanks.
Thank you as always for the reminder, joker_josue

I just updated the
Bangla translation and made a
short announcement inside the AOBT thread. Hope that helps, cheers.
And I once again ask, how do you know the top 10 viewed images? By number of downloads?

6. Post 66692558 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Tue May 5 21:20:19 CEST 2026) in [AOBT] THE ALLIANCE OF BITCOINTALK TRANSLATORS:
April's Statistics Data for TalkImg is made available by joker_josue.
So this should be in the attention of DS, GazetaBitcoin, Porfirii, Peanutswar, cygan, mindrust, dansus021, mindrust, zasad@, Kavelj22, JunaidAzizi, Chilwell, M47AK16 and ovcijisir.
Please update your corresponding local translations.

Statistics April 2026____________________
7. Post 66692437 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Tue May 5 20:54:13 CEST 2026) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
Statistics April 2026____________________April is always a significant month for TalkImg, as it was the month it was launched (even if it was at the end of the month). This past April marked the 3rd anniversary of our launch, so we put together a year-end report, which you can
see here.
Since last year, I've been mentioning that I'm preparing an update, but unfortunately I haven't been able to implement it. It was while trying to launch this update, coinciding with TalkImg's 3rd anniversary, that a small problem arose. I had planned to release the update on April 26th, but things didn't go as expected, and TalkImg was down for about 8 hours, preventing new image uploads.
When I started uploading the new update, I realized that some of the changes I made would conflict with the active database version. As soon as I detected this situation, a few minutes later, I canceled the update. However, some of these changes had already been applied, causing some conflicts. Initially I thought I had managed to restore the situation, since I had made all the necessary backups beforehand. But for some reason, the backup reset wasn't being applied. After almost an hour of trying to restore the backups, I had to request support from the server's technical team.
The system entered a loop, and therefore the reset was never applied. Because of this, the technical team had to reset the entire server in order to break the loop and ensure the reset was applied. The whole process ended up taking longer than expected because I wanted to ensure that the images remained active and working here on the forum, while also ensuring that none of them were lost during the entire process. Despite the delay, we achieved this goal; the images on the forum were always working, and no images were lost.
If my memory serves me right, I think this was the only time TalkImg wasn't operational during the entire last year. With everything working as before, I will now review all the adjustments I made again, as well as perform more tests, to ensure that nothing conflicts again. Believe me, I always want to provide the best possible service. So, thank you for all your support! Thank you very much.
Here are the numbers for the month:
| |
 | Number of uploads in the month: 7 439 (-152 that in the last month)
|
 | Total disk space in the month: 2.27GB (0.29 that in the last month)
|
 | Number of visits to the talkimg.com website in the month: 1 021 682* Estimated number of times images were viewed on the forum in the month (hits): 19 443 384* Bandwidth in the month: 635.66GB* *This data may not represent total/real numbers, because of Cloudflare.
|
Top 10 Images ViewedThe 10 images viewed (estimated) this month, which were uploaded in the previous month.
#01
291 views |  | | #02
291 views |  | | #03
290 views |  | | #04
285 views |  | | #05
284 views |  |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#06
267 views |  | | #07
259 views |  | | #08
244 views |  | | #09
230 views |  | | #10
222 views |  |
Info for:
Kavelj22 | dansus021 | DYING_S0UL | cygan | Porfirii | ovcijisir | Chilwell | JunaidAzizi | Peanutswar | zasad@ | GazetaBitcoin | mindrust
New statistical data from TalkImg has been published. You will be able to share it in the topic you translated. Thanks.
8. Post 66691661 (unedited backup) (by SuperBitMan) (scraped on Tue May 5 18:06:19 CEST 2026) in Newbies be careful with old members, when they PM you for business.:
I was once a newbie and I am not sure about what OP is saying because those who send PM are not high rank members, because they won't want to risk it, if they get exposed by the newbie they can get a red tag.
A newbie posted today in the Reputation board about how he received a from an old member offering to sell him merits to rank up to Junior membership:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579730.msg66687004#msg66687004The forum account is a confirmed account seller and already tagged but expect newbies might not be aware about the trust system and accept the offer. Note that some old members with red tags have also some green tags that might give him some kind of credibility.
The only way to fight those scammers is to never hesitate to report to mods. Unfortunetly most of newbie accounts have no clue about this feature in their profiles.
This issue of old members sending a message to newbies for wrong business deals has been happening in the forum that was the main reason I created This thread in this board so newbies will be aware of what is happening in the forum, the link thread you posted is an evidence that old members usually PM newbies for wrong business, the account that PM the newbie is already an account known for such in the forum, some newbies will fall for all this guys because they are new in the forum and won’t understand some things that is actually going on in the forum.
You are right the only way is for newbies to report any PM they find suspicious to Mod, and you are still right most newbies don’t know how to report to mod too well I think I will create a thread about that so I can teach those that don’t know.
9. Post 66690324 (unedited backup) (by Sportmarket) (scraped on Tue May 5 11:21:49 CEST 2026) in Sportmarket — Sports Betting Brokerage | Crypto Deposits | KYC Required:
The asset verification requirement is too high. It requires verification of funds for the most recent three months, and even one month less is not acceptable. I believe many people will be deterred by this requirement, because I am one of them.
I understand it can feel excessive, but we work under a strict license, which is why the three-month window isn't really something we can shorten case by case. The reason it's set at three months is to get a clear and consistent picture of how funds are moving over time, instead of a single snapshot that can leave gaps. A shorter window tends to raise more questions on the compliance side, which usually causes more friction down the line, not less.
The good thing is that it's mostly a one-time process. Once the initial verification is completed, you usually won't need to go through the same level of checks again unless something on the account changes.
Let me be honest, it is awesome that you ask for everything from the beginning that won't deceive users to register and deposit then stuck with verification upon withdrawal request. It is always better to be as much clear as possible to gain trust. However, I can't figure it out how to handle with source of funds for crypto users. I can think about those using decentralized exchanges or bought some cryptocurrencies from a friend or from a P2P platform. Not to forget those who directly deposit from the wallet of the seller, as I can buy directly from a forum user using another cryptocurrency then give him the deposit address from you sportmarket.
Let's make it easier for readers, actually I am enrolled in a signature campaign in bitcointalk, how can I provide the proof of funds if you will ask me one day?
Appreciate the question, Kavelj22. It wouldn't really be right for us to publish a checklist of what counts as proof for every scenario, every source-of-funds review is done individually based on the user's circumstances, and committing to specifics in a forum post would set expectations we can't realistically keep across every case.
What we can say in general terms:
- Deposits need to come from a wallet you control.
- You should be able to explain where the funds came from and provide reasonable documentation if we ask for it.
That covers the cases you raised. If it ever comes up on your account, support can walk you through what's needed for your specific situation.
10. Post 66688349 (unedited backup) (by Wakate) (scraped on Mon May 4 19:37:31 CEST 2026) in Are gambling and meme coin investing the same?:
In reality, these both are so bad that I can't decide which one is worse, they are both horrible for your finances and should not be done at all. I get that people do it, but that doesn't mean that they should, they should stay away from it if they want to make money.
One is horrible more than the other in each case for each one of them. Although the comparison is not that accurate. Investing in meme coins at some extents is more harmful than gambling as we know the traditional gambling in sports and basefld in pure lacks.
Those that are gambling are busy making their money once they understand when to invest in memecoins and when to sell their holdings to avoid losing to a project due to rug pull. Making money from gambling and investing is not the same.
A gambler in the crypto market could make faster profits when they gamble than someone that that js investing in different crypto projects.
11. Post 66688233 (unedited backup) (by Ochan_yazo_tochant) (scraped on Mon May 4 19:14:31 CEST 2026) in كيف سيكون الربع الأخير لهذا العام؟:
صحيح ما تقوله أخي أثناء كتابتي للمنشور السابق شهد مسار السعر تراجع و هذا أمر طبيعي، و الآن بدأ بالإنتعاش بحيث كان إفتتاح الشهر الثاني أخضر أعتقد أنه سيلمس المستوى 90000$ بعد سيتراجع و المحاولة مجدداً لإختراق هذا المستوى الذي يبدو هاماً خصوصا إذا نجح في الإستقرار فوق منه لذا سنرى ما يخبئه المستقبل.
هذا الموضوع بحد ذاته اصبح outdated بما انه كان يتطرق الى توقعات حركة السعر في الربع الاخير من السنة الفارطة 2025. نحن لازلنا الى اليوم غرة ماي 1026 اي في الربع الثاني من السنة الموالية نتكلم عن السعر هنا بااشكل الذي اصبح فيه العنوان مضللا الى حد ما. اقترح عليك ان تقفل هذا الموضوع و تقوم بانشاء موضوع جديد مخصص للنقاشات حول حركة السعر تماما مثل موضوع Wall observer btc price في القسم الرئيسي بالانجليزية. اعتقد ان القسم العربي بحاجة لهكذا موضوع كي لا يتم انشاء موضوع يتحدث عن السعر في كل فترة من العام. هذا يخلق حالة من السبام غير المقصود على كل حال.
بالنسبة للسعر فانا شخصيا لازلت اتوقع في حالة شبه استقرار منذ فترة جويلة تسبق الحرب الايران و تتجاوزها. و حتى بالتزامن مع مؤتمر البيتكوين فانه لا يبدو هناك مؤشرات صعود كبير او انهيار ملحوظ في حركة السعر قريبا.
كلامك صحيح بخصوص التضليل و لكن من الناحية الفنية يبدو العنوان جيد لأنه بفتح موضوع في زمان معين و إعادة تحديثه يعتبر أفضل لأنه يصبح مرجع يمكن الإستفادة من طرف زوار المنتدى و أيضاً مواصلة النقاش البناء في الخيط أفضل بكثير من فتح موضوع بنفس الصيغة و تحت عناوين جديدة و هذا ما أعتقد شخصياً النشر الغير المرغوب فيه و اصبح المواضيع مملة في آن واحد.
12. Post 66688205 (unedited backup) (by Ochan_yazo_tochant) (scraped on Mon May 4 19:08:37 CEST 2026) in امكانية تجميد البيتكوين:
بالإضافة إلى ما ذكره الأخ Kavelj22 فبرأيي لايوجد هناك ما يسمى عناوين بيتكوين الحرس الثوري أو غيره لأن البيتكوين يحافظ على الخصوصية فلن يتم اكتشاف أن هذا العنوان للحرس الثوري إلا بعد أن يتم ربط العنوان بمعاملة من إحدى الخدمات المركزية التي تتطلب إثبات الهوية عدا ذلك لايمكن لأي جهة لا الولايات المتحدة ولا غيرها أن تعرف لمن هذا العنوان
~~.
لا ننسى ان هناك عملات الخصوصية لا يمكن لاي جهة تتبعها و هي خيار جيد لايران او لكل من يريد اخفاء نشاطاته على البلوكشين، و ان امريكا طلبت رسميا عدم التعامل مع ايران في ما يتعلق بالرسوم على العبور من المضيق مهددة بفرض اجراءات عقابية عليها.
من خلال المناقشة يتضح أنه لا يمكن تجميد الأرصدة من طرف جهة معينة أي عملياً لا يمكن فعل ذلك حتى و لو تم الإستحواذ على نسبة كبيرة و لو كان أكثر من 90% هذا يستحيل في الأصل الإستحواذ عليه إلا في حالة إتفاق الحكومات على نطاق واسع و هذا الإتفاق يحتاج بدوره إلى مجموعة من التحديات خصوصاً الإختلاف الجيوسياسي من بلد إلى أخر.
نعم أخي @kavelj22 كنت قد أشارت أيضاً لهذه المعلومة في أحد المواضيع هنا في القسم العربي بخصوص قبول إيران لرسوم عبر العملة المشفرة. بأنها ستفتح الطريق نحو إستخدام عملات الخصوصية. و لاحظت إحدى هذه العملات zcash التي بدأ ينتعش حركة سعرها أعتقد أنها ستستمر بهذا الزخم لتصل مستويات جيدة ربما ستعود بالأرباح الجيدة لمن إستثمر في مستوى 200$ في الشهرين الماضيين.
13. Post 66687615 (unedited backup) (by MuffinMaster) (scraped on Mon May 4 16:52:19 CEST 2026) in Sportmarket — Sports Betting Brokerage | Crypto Deposits | KYC Required:
The asset verification requirement is too high. It requires verification of funds for the most recent three months, and even one month less is not acceptable. I believe many people will be deterred by this requirement, because I am one of them.
I understand it can feel excessive, but we work under a strict license, which is why the three-month window isn't really something we can shorten case by case. The reason it's set at three months is to get a clear and consistent picture of how funds are moving over time, instead of a single snapshot that can leave gaps. A shorter window tends to raise more questions on the compliance side, which usually causes more friction down the line, not less.
The good thing is that it's mostly a one-time process. Once the initial verification is completed, you usually won't need to go through the same level of checks again unless something on the account changes.
Let me be honest, it is awesome that you ask for everything from the beginning that won't deceive users to register and deposit then stuck with verification upon withdrawal request. It is always better to be as much clear as possible to gain trust. However, I can't figure it out how to handle with source of funds for crypto users. I can think about those using decentralized exchanges or bought some cryptocurrencies from a friend or from a P2P platform. Not to forget those who directly deposit from the wallet of the seller, as I can buy directly from a forum user using another cryptocurrency then give him the deposit address from you sportmarket.
Let's make it easier for readers, actually I am enrolled in a signature campaign in bitcointalk, how can I provide the proof of funds if you will ask me one day?
I think the most important message in this requirement is - only use funds whose source you can prove.
14. Post 66687596 (unedited backup) (by AmoreJaz) (scraped on Mon May 4 16:47:02 CEST 2026) in Sportmarket — Sports Betting Brokerage | Crypto Deposits | KYC Required:
The asset verification requirement is too high. It requires verification of funds for the most recent three months, and even one month less is not acceptable. I believe many people will be deterred by this requirement, because I am one of them.
I understand it can feel excessive, but we work under a strict license, which is why the three-month window isn't really something we can shorten case by case. The reason it's set at three months is to get a clear and consistent picture of how funds are moving over time, instead of a single snapshot that can leave gaps. A shorter window tends to raise more questions on the compliance side, which usually causes more friction down the line, not less.
The good thing is that it's mostly a one-time process. Once the initial verification is completed, you usually won't need to go through the same level of checks again unless something on the account changes.
Let me be honest, it is awesome that you ask for everything from the beginning that won't deceive users to register and deposit then stuck with verification upon withdrawal request. It is always better to be as much clear as possible to gain trust. However, I can't figure it out how to handle with source of funds for crypto users. I can think about those using decentralized exchanges or bought some cryptocurrencies from a friend or from a P2P platform. Not to forget those who directly deposit from the wallet of the seller, as I can buy directly from a forum user using another cryptocurrency then give him the deposit address from you sportmarket.
Let's make it easier for readers, actually I am enrolled in a signature campaign in bitcointalk, how can I provide the proof of funds if you will ask me one day?
At least they are pretty straightforward about this requirement, so the gambler won't be surprised later on. So they should know already what they are getting into even at the start of their journey of using this site. For me, this requirement is quite a hurdle as most licensed casinos or bookies found in the forum don't have this kind of requirement. So the gambler should weigh his options here and understand about this requirement and should be ready to provide those info if needed. This for me is quite tedious for the site itself as they need to verify the validity of the funds presented for the last 3 months.
15. Post 66685958 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Mon May 4 05:11:02 CEST 2026) in امكانية تجميد البيتكوين:
مشكور على الشرح أخي، للمزيد من المعلومات مثلاً في حالة تم وضع علامة على عناوين لمنظمة أو نظام مثل عناوين حرس الثوري الإيراني الذي كان قد أعلن قبول الرسوم العبور بالبتكوين هل سيحتاج النظام لإنشاء حوض تعدين من أجل تأكيد المعاملة أم أن العملية غير ممكنة؟
أحواض التعدين لا علاقة لها بالاعتبارات الجيوسياسية لانها مهمتها هي تأكيد المعاملات على البلوكشين مقابل رسوم. اي ادراج لعناوين شخص ما او جهة ما فهو لغاية التتبع و ليس لمنع المعدنين من ادراجها في بلوكاتهم. لو كان الامر بخذه السهولة لكان تم ادراج عناوين مجموعة لازاروس او التنظيمات الارهابية و لكن هذا لا ينفع في شيء و السلطات نفسها تعرف انه لا فائدة من وضع هكذا قواعد لانه ببساطة يمكن لصاحب العناوين استعملل احدى الميكسرات و ايضا حتى لو تم اجبار احواض تعدين قابلة بالاملاءات فانه بلا شك ستبقى واحدة لن ترضخ للشروط و ستواصل عملها. اذا كان هناك عقوبات فيجب ان تكون للخدمات التي تتعامل مع الجهات المعاقبة مثل منصات التداول او بنوك او مؤسسات مالية.
من الوارد فعلا ان يتم ادراج عناوين بيتكوين تابعة لايران تحت المراقبة لان ترامب حذر من اي شركة ستدفع رسوما لايران مقابل المرور عبر مضيق هرمز ستعرض نفسها لعقوبات امريكية.
بالإضافة إلى ما ذكره الأخ Kavelj22 فبرأيي لايوجد هناك ما يسمى عناوين بيتكوين الحرس الثوري أو غيره لأن البيتكوين يحافظ على الخصوصية فلن يتم اكتشاف أن هذا العنوان للحرس الثوري إلا بعد أن يتم ربط العنوان بمعاملة من إحدى الخدمات المركزية التي تتطلب إثبات الهوية عدا ذلك لايمكن لأي جهة لا الولايات المتحدة ولا غيرها أن تعرف لمن هذا العنوان
16. Post 66685923 (unedited backup) (by Ochan_yazo_tochant) (scraped on Mon May 4 04:44:19 CEST 2026) in امكانية تجميد البيتكوين:
مشكور على الشرح أخي، للمزيد من المعلومات مثلاً في حالة تم وضع علامة على عناوين لمنظمة أو نظام مثل عناوين حرس الثوري الإيراني الذي كان قد أعلن قبول الرسوم العبور بالبتكوين هل سيحتاج النظام لإنشاء حوض تعدين من أجل تأكيد المعاملة أم أن العملية غير ممكنة؟
أحواض التعدين لا علاقة لها بالاعتبارات الجيوسياسية لانها مهمتها هي تأكيد المعاملات على البلوكشين مقابل رسوم. اي ادراج لعناوين شخص ما او جهة ما فهو لغاية التتبع و ليس لمنع المعدنين من ادراجها في بلوكاتهم. لو كان الامر بخذه السهولة لكان تم ادراج عناوين مجموعة لازاروس او التنظيمات الارهابية و لكن هذا لا ينفع في شيء و السلطات نفسها تعرف انه لا فائدة من وضع هكذا قواعد لانه ببساطة يمكن لصاحب العناوين استعملل احدى الميكسرات و ايضا حتى لو تم اجبار احواض تعدين قابلة بالاملاءات فانه بلا شك ستبقى واحدة لن ترضخ للشروط و ستواصل عملها. اذا كان هناك عقوبات فيجب ان تكون للخدمات التي تتعامل مع الجهات المعاقبة مثل منصات التداول او بنوك او مؤسسات مالية.
من الوارد فعلا ان يتم ادراج عناوين بيتكوين تابعة لايران تحت المراقبة لان ترامب حذر من اي شركة ستدفع رسوما لايران مقابل المرور عبر مضيق هرمز ستعرض نفسها لعقوبات امريكية.
شكراً على التوضيح أخي الآن فهمت المسألة بشكل أفضل كما أشار الأخ makey في رده السابق بأن المعدنيين هم أيضاً في حاجة إلى دخل من خلال إدراج المعاملات و تأكيدها خصوصاً إذا كانت تدفع رسوماً أعلى. و هذا هو المقصود باللامركزية لذلك أعتقد أن شعبية البتكوين أخذت المبادرة من الشفافية التي تتمتع بها شبكة البلوكتشين بحيث لا يمكن التحكم فيها من طرف جهة معينة كالحكومة أو النظام.
17. Post 66678555 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Sat May 2 04:34:49 CEST 2026) in امكانية تجميد البيتكوين:
الصين بكل النفوذ الذي كان لديها و الذي ربما لايزال لا يمكن ان تكون فكرت بهكذا سيناريو. حضر التعدين في الصين لا يعني انها تخلت عن القطاع بالكامل خصوصا انها لاتزال قادرة على تصنيع مكونات الاجهزة و الاجهزة بحد ذاتها بالاضافة الى احتمال نقل نشاط التعدين خارج البلاد دون التفريط فيه بالكامل. اذكر اننا كنا تعرضنا مرة لحادثة اكتشاف مزرعة تعدين في ليبيا يديرها صينيون.
نعم أخي هذا صحيح ، وهناك نقطة جوهرية يجب الانتباه إليها فيما يخص أحواض التعدين وهي أن أحواض التعدين ليس هي من يملك القوة الحقيقية للتعدين بل هم المعدنون الذين يكونون من مختلف أنحاء العالم ، يعني على سبيل المثال AntPool الحوض نفسه موجود في الصين لكن الهاش الذي يأتي للحوض موزّع عالميًا وليس داخل الصين فقط من خلال جميع المعدنين المنضمين للحوض من جميع أنحاء العالم وبالتالي لو حاولت مثلا الحكومة الصينية فرض إجراءات مخالفة لمجتمع بيتكوين يمكن للمعدنين بكل بساطة التخلي عن الحوض والتوجه إلى حوض آخر وهكذا سيفقد الحوض قوته أو تأثيره.
هكذا أعتقد وأتمنى من الأخ mikeywith أن يؤكد لنا هذا الفكرة أو يصححها إن كنت مخطئا
18. Post 66677953 (unedited backup) (by Potato Chips) (scraped on Fri May 1 23:26:49 CEST 2026) in 🍀 Lucky.fun | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino & Sportsbook | Instant Payouts:
The bonus structure is explained under the terms and conditions for bonuses: 4.2 Wagering Requirement: 40× (Forty times) the bonus amount must be wagered in eligible games (see Section 7) before any bonus-derived funds or winnings can be withdrawn.
Sure, though from what I can remember, it wasn't tagged as bonus money? Typically, there will be a distinction between bonus and real money in casinos, and I didn't see it or maybe I missed it.
Well, you can just try and check when you claim your test money. Maybe op can post here as well when all slots for the 5 bucks have been taken.
19. Post 66676765 (unedited backup) (by hd49728) (scraped on Fri May 1 18:25:07 CEST 2026) in ✨ XMR.GG | The First XMR/Monero Casino | Sports & Casino :
They use XMR as a mean of promotion to invite users thinking to find the best haven to protect their privacy while gambling. A service dedicated to use Monero for the goal to care about privacy shouldn't be a licensed service at first place. We all know the fight of the authorities against privacy coins, so don't expect them to give a license to a company that aims to provide anonymity services.
It is honest that they have mentioned this in their TOS from the start. They could have given users the illusion of complete privacy and then added a KYC/AML policy update later.
The OP did not return to the forum since days ago but it does not mean he won't return to the forum, let's be patiently waiting for the OP comeback to answer some questions from the community.
XMR is truly a biggest privacy coin and it leads the privacy category in cryptocurrency industry, so it's a most favorite target of governments if they want to do regulations on breaking down possible money laundering. About possibility of getting a license for a company built on XMR blockchain, I don't know but I don't exclude chance of getting a valid license. Not all nations prohibit Monero so there is chance for getting a valid business license but surely with Monero, risk of having legal issues with governments can appear anytime.
20. Post 66672672 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Apr 30 16:16:19 CEST 2026) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
Its the last day of April, meaning time for yet another brief monthly overview, and this time for March 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr
Merit Dashboard and BitList.
Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards but are part of this overview.
Post activity per local board during March 2026During the last month, 13524 posts were made across local boards, which is an increase slight compared to February's 12919 posts. Top 3 boards reemained the same as month before, and this increase mainly happened there.
Active members per local board during March 2026During March, 1305 forum members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards, making it a small decrease compared to February, during which 1335 members were active. Nigerian boards remained at the top, but this time Russian came aalittle bit closer than before, while all the other local boards are far behind.
Local board members per amount of posts during March 2026When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Polish is the leader with 67% of such members, while at the same time Nigerian had the lowest, only 16%.
In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Russian board with 46%, while on the other side is Plish local that had only 17% of such members.
Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Turkish is the leader with 53% while Romanian didn't have a single member who wrote 10+ posts.
Merit shared per local board during March 20267089 merit was shared across local board during March, which is a big drop compared to February's 7901 and is spread among majority of the boards. At the same, the most merited one (Nigerian) even managed to increase their merit shared compared to February and is one of the rare ones that managed to do that.
Merit/Post ratio per local board during March 2026During March, average merit per post across local boards was 0.52 which is a decrease compared to February's 0.61, which is expected considering the increase of the amount of posts and in the same time decrease of sent merit. Despite that, the average is still very good, and majority of local boards can't complain about that. Having said that, some local boards are still undermerited.
Merit senders and receivers per local board during March 2026During March 517 members sent while 602 received merit which is a expected decrease compared to February (535 senders, 615 receivers).
Percentage of merited posts across local boards during March 2026No surprise here-Romanian board once again at the top, and this time they are back at 60%, but this time they have Italian board just behind them with a very high 55%, which is even more impressive considering their number of posts.
Merit per transaction across local boards during March 2026Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habit of local boards
And in the end of the overview, lists of the most active local boards members. joker_josue from Portuguese local boatrd is back at the top with 135 posts, followed by klarki from Russian boartd with 131 post and mandown from Turkish local who wrote 128 posts. GG guys!