Last update: 2025-12-12_Fri_09.30h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Kavelj22 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Kavelj22
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Kavelj22" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66162384 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 09:26:31 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
Even it seems to be acceptable, but 25X and 45X sounds exaggerated to me whatever the type of the bonus is. If compared to other wagering requirements in other casinos, casinos enforce this so high requirement would lose a large user base because of this if to consider how many users join the casino attracted by the bonus. Casinos are free to set the wagering requirement they see right, but i think it should be as much raisonable as possible.
I also dislike high wagering requirements. However, this is now the standard at casinos. They have a higher wagering requirement for the bonuses, which can be as high to 45x. Of course, the casinos do not want to give free money to players. The players cannot complete the wagering requirement most of the time either. I think the reasonable wagering requirement would be below 20 times the deposit amount. However, it is the casino that sets the wagering requirement, actually. If one popular casino decreases its wagering requirement, then other casinos may follow suit. However, they currently follow the standard, and the ratio is typically 25x to 45x.
2. Post 66159837 (unedited backup) (by maknyos) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 17:11:56 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
Even it seems to be acceptable, but 25X and 45X sounds exaggerated to me whatever the type of the bonus is. If compared to other wagering requirements in other casinos, casinos enforce this so high requirement would lose a large user base because of this if to consider how many users join the casino attracted by the bonus. Casinos are free to set the wagering requirement they see right, but i think it should be as much raisonable as possible.
The wagering requirement is at least 1x to prevent violations such as money laundering, but for bonuses they usually apply higher requirements. It is very reasonable for them to apply higher requirements, but we are happier when the requirements are still achievable, such as 5x or 10x for example.
However, that is just our preference, as the casino itself has the right to determine the requirements. However, they must also consider the risk of losing users if they set high requirements, as you mentioned.
3. Post 66159511 (unedited backup) (by nemesis_incarnate) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 15:53:49 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
Not only about bonus abuse, but also for deposits that should have a wagering requirement so the casino doesn't turn to be a mixer. Meanwhile, I think 100% wagering requirement is quite enough. There are no needs to rise the wagering requirement and make it more difficult for users to use their winning. They will fastly run away either they succeed to withdraw or lost everything.
Yeah, I agree with that. That is why the casino implemented a 1x wagering requirement on deposits, and the casino claims it is done to prevent money laundering, which is the same reason mixers do it. Yes, you are correct about that. 1x wagering requirement is enough already to prevent money laundering. I see more and more casinos are adopting this method to avoid money laundering. A 1x wagering requirement applies only to deposits. As for the deposit bonuses, casinos imply 25x to 45x wagering requirements depending on the bonus type.
Even it seems to be acceptable, but 25X and 45X sounds exaggerated to me whatever the type of the bonus is. If compared to other wagering requirements in other casinos, casinos enforce this so high requirement would lose a large user base because of this if to consider how many users join the casino attracted by the bonus. Casinos are free to set the wagering requirement they see right, but i think it should be as much raisonable as possible.
Such bonuses are no wonders for me, the x-es, I mean.
But truly, they become bigger and bigger by the years
4. Post 66158232 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 09:37:50 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
Not only about bonus abuse, but also for deposits that should have a wagering requirement so the casino doesn't turn to be a mixer. Meanwhile, I think 100% wagering requirement is quite enough. There are no needs to rise the wagering requirement and make it more difficult for users to use their winning. They will fastly run away either they succeed to withdraw or lost everything.
Yeah, I agree with that. That is why the casino implemented a 1x wagering requirement on deposits, and the casino claims it is done to prevent money laundering, which is the same reason mixers do it. Yes, you are correct about that. 1x wagering requirement is enough already to prevent money laundering. I see more and more casinos are adopting this method to avoid money laundering. A 1x wagering requirement applies only to deposits. As for the deposit bonuses, casinos imply 25x to 45x wagering requirements depending on the bonus type.
5. Post 66157576 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 03:07:55 CET 2025) in رفع الحظر عن سوريا!!:
شكرا لك أخي Kavelj22 على التحديث
نعم بطبيعة الحال سمعنا الخبر وجميع السوريين فرحين بهذا التطور المهم الذين ينتظرونه بفارغ الصبر
في الواقع رغم أنه لايزال مشاكل ولايزال هناك تحديات كبيرة أمام الحكومة السورية لكن نرى أن الشرع يبذل كل جهد للالتزام بالشروط والسيطرة على الوضع لكن لايزال حتى الآن غير قادر على ضبط الأمور تماما خاصة الطائفة والسلاح المنفلت خارج الدولة.
منذ أيام قليلة فقط حدثت فتنة طائفية كبيرة في المدينة التي أقيم فيها (حمص) وكادت تحرق الأخضر واليابس حيث هجم البدو المسلحين بالبنادق تجاه أحياء العلوية العزل الذين لايملكون أي سلاح وأحرقوا ممتلكاتهم وضربوا بعضهم ولولا تدخل الأمن العام السوري وحماية الأقليات العزل في هذه الأحياء لربما سال نهر من الدم وسبب هذه الفتنة أن أحد المجرمين قام بقتل شخص وزوجته من البدو وكتب على الجدران عبارات طائفية تدل كأن العلوية فعلوها للانتقام ولكن بعد التحقيقات تبين أن القاتل هو ابن اخت الزوجة وقد قتلهم بقصد السرقة وكتب هذه العبارات لتمويه الحقيقة وتوجيه الأنظار نحو العلوية الأقليات الضعفاء.
الشاهد من هذه القصة وما رأيناه بأعينا وللأمانة فقد قام الأمن العام على الفور بالتدخل وتطويق الأحياء واضطروا لطلب تعزيزات من مدن أخرى للسيطرة على البدو وإخراجهم من هذه الأحياء بأقل الخسائر، لكن في نفس الوقت يبقى السؤال لماذا تترك الدولة السلاح بيد البدو والفصائل المقاتلة خارج الدولة حتى الآن؟
6. Post 66155735 (unedited backup) (by passwordnow) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 16:55:13 CET 2025) in USDT or USDC or any other alternative?:
We have no option but to choose to either or both of them. If I have a lot of money that I want to sit in stable coin and I don't have to use them as of now, I'll divide my wealth into two of them. That's just to be safe in keeping them in either. Both are liquid and have the most volume in the space so, if we really have to choose and keep them in stable coins, I wouldn't mind but these two are the best options so don't have to stick to any of them.
There is another conception of DAI stablecoin which is not widely used but a model that worth interesting. I think it's the only model of a stable decentralized cryptocurrency.
Most of users if not saying the great majority of crypto users aren't aware of this kind of concepts and think sticked with Usd foat backed cryptocurrencies.
Yes, it's also mentioned above. It's a decentralized stable coin and many are not yet aware of it. So, there goes the three if someone is still looking for one. I think it's true that many are not going to chose this type of stablecoin if they haven't heard of it yet and if they are comfortable with the usage of these existing ones. To be honest, many don't look at the technical side of it and what is being used by the many, that's what they use.
7. Post 66155285 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 14:42:02 CET 2025) in Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?:
Wasn't this reason good enough to change the username?
I barely care about what JollyGood says. He was in my ignore list for a while. I think I unignored him a few weeks ago.
This is not the only reason. I have other reasons for changing my username, and I wrote them on a different thread. I get too many mentions daily from topics I never posted because of my username. People use this keyword and wallla.
Would you believe that my locals started copying my username?
I find that
hard to believe 
"Trick".
This new nickname fits nicely
Do you think so?
I guess that was pointed out by someone already, and I thought it fit better.
In the past week, at least 4 users got a name change.
I haven't seen any application thread for a name change. Did they send a PM to theymos for that? Look at my username.
I get unnecessary daily mentions of useless topics like Helping kids learn Bitcoin, teaching kids about Bitcoin is not in vain, etc. Whenever people use this word, I get notified via Telegram with TryNinja's bot. What is the good reason for changing a username? Is my reason good enough to consider?
You're asking this right after you added an abusive negative feedback?
Trading with Satofan44 is risky due to his history of aggressive and abusive forum behavior, including frequent insults, derogatory remarks (e.g., racist comments), and retaliatory negative trust feedback for non-scam issues.
His poor interpersonal style increases the likelihood that disputes will escalate during trades.
Help me understand which part reads as abusive and which part is not correct.
Unlike others, I have explained why I think trading with him is high-risk.
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk. You might also be able to add a flag.
8. Post 66155245 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 14:26:20 CET 2025) in Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?:
Giving someone negative feedback for saying mean things on the internet is as petty as petty gets.
For what it's worth: I trust your judgement more than God Of Thunder (who changed his username 6 weeks after
Learn Bitcoin got called out by JollyGood), Ultegra134, Mia Chloe and Kavelj22 combined.
Even though I can't agree with your feedback, it made me chuckle:
Not a shit poster pissing off shit posters.
Does that mean you do not exclude people who are not in DT?
Feel free to open a topic about this, or discuss it in my Reputation thread, or probably better: on Meta, in one of the threads about the currect feedback system.
I would love to invite you to go through some members' feedback, including mine, and tell if they belong on DT
You're asking this right after you added an abusive negative feedback?
Trading with Satofan44 is risky due to his history of aggressive and abusive forum behavior, including frequent insults, derogatory remarks (e.g., racist comments), and retaliatory negative trust feedback for non-scam issues.
His poor interpersonal style increases the likelihood that disputes will escalate during trades.
9. Post 66154765 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 11:40:13 CET 2025) in Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?:
Since when is it acceptable to call other people idiots, complete retards, make racist comments that hold no background, in the forum?
If by "acceptable" you mean "allowed", I'd say it's been allowed for as long as I can remember.
Allow me to quote myself quoting myself on free speech. I posted this in an earlier topic about Satofan44:
I find these statements deeply offensive
That's okay. You're free to feel offended whenever you choose to do so.
and contrary to the values that this forum is built on.
That's not at all what this forum is about:
the forum's mission to be as free as possible
This is not the first time I see people advocate for less freedom and more rules. Not only here, many people do the same in real life. But they don't realize those freedoms are lost forever once they're gone.
If this type of behavior is allowed in this forum, then here will be turned into another racism breading ground.
I've seen these discussions long before you joined, and the longer I'm here, the more I appreciate theymos' stance on the subject: freedom of speech above censorship.
To quote myself on the subject:
Use the Ignore button, problem solved. You can't possible expect everyone on the internet to be nice to you.
This forum gives users the freedom to be as rude as they want, just like it gives anyone else the freedom to be as nice as they want. Enjoy the freedom to choose your style, but let others enjoy the same freedom.
I have no problem with anyone's style as long as it's not pointing me.
Well, then that's your problem. It's simple as that. I would have started this sentence with "I'm sorry to say, ....", but then I realized that would go against the point I'm trying to make. Hurting someone's feelings is allowed. Grow a thicker skin, and stop caring. It's really that simple.
Who cares, you don't know the person, you don't have to meet him, and yet, you
choose to read his posts while you can easily ignore them at the click of a button! Why make yourself suffer for something that can only get worse if you give it more attention?
I'm usually quite polite on Bitcointalk, up to the point where the Cat and now others started calling me Switzerland. But I highly appreciate the freedom to
not be polite if someone wants to. Your hurt feelings don't take away someone else's right to say what he wants.
Bitcointalk offers more freedom than any other forum I know. You can choose to be an asshole or you can be a nice person. It's entirely up to you how you want to come across. If you're a snowflake, you might get offended.
That's okay.
So what?
The only right answer
Discrimination and racism is all part of freedom of speech. You can't have freedom of speech without someone else having the same freedom, and as I once read: freedom of speech is
especially necessary for controversial subjects! You don't need freedom of speech to say bunnies are fluffy.
So if someone wants to discriminate: let them! Use ignore if you want, discuss with them, try to change their mind
(as if that's ever worked on the internet) or just move on with your day.
Who cares what an anonymous person on the internet says? See my personal text to see how much I care.
Besides, as long as hell doesn't freeze over, you can have any race, nationality or gender you want on Bitcointalk. There's an attack helicopter as Global Moderator, that's all fine
How about if the admin filter some keywords(foul words), such that when you use them, you will be handed ban.
It's always amazing how people volunteer to give up the freedoms they've been given. It's truely scary, not only online but also in real life.
Bitcointalk is the only forum I know that allows freedom of speech. If you don't like it, go to SJW forum.
What the f*ck, do you think censoring *BEEP* is going to make the forum any better? I miss TMAN, go read
Poetry, by TMAN.
If I'm offended by someone online, it means I am doing something wrong by being offended by someone or I did something wrong to attract an attack on me?
If you
choose to be offended by something an anonymous person says on the big mean internet, you're doing something wrong. Why would you choose to give someone such power over you?
What is your understanding of freedom of speech? Do you know that there is an unofficial rule that says "No trolling?". If freedom of speech is what you think it is, why will such a rule apply?
Calling an idiot an idiot is not trolling. A bit more context:
However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).
To quote myself on the subject:
Just recently, I saw several posts saying: "I hope I'm not offending anyone", and it's been on my mind for a while now.
I only recently realized why this is so common in English. In Dutch, "offended" and "insulted" are the same word ("beledigd"). But lately, it seems like people treat the word "offending" as if it's "insulting".
I'd say insulting isn't needed and makes you look bad, but being offended is a choice of the receiver, and honestly I'm offended by people who want to limit their own freedom of speech out of fear that someone might get his feelings hurt on the internet! Oh noes!
It's okay to offended people! Offensive jokes are often funny. Don't let SJW decide what you're allowed to say or even think!
Trying to be nice doesn't hurt you, but don't let someone's made up feelings stop you from speaking your mind.
I can't agree with you. You can also gently criticize a person. To insult is only to insult, nothing more. And it is not right to talk about freedom of expression while insulting a person.
I am insulted by the very fact that you think you can have freedom of speech without being allowed to insult someone. So by your own definition you're not allowed to say that!
Luckily for you, you actually have the right to say pretty much anything you want on this forum. And as a
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader, I can handle anything you throw at me.
For example, I insulted you and you did it to me. What's the matter here? What did the forum gain from this? When viewed from the outside, the forum is seen as a place where racism, neopotism and swearing are falling.
It's the internet, I couldn't care less about your race. You can claim to be a Smurf if you want too. It can't be checked anyway, so why do you even care?
I think I'm usually pretty friendly, and I usually don't try very hard to insult people. But I can understand why others do that, and I highly value their right to do so. If someone, especially in an anonymous environment, treats others badly, it tells you a lot about them. But how you handle it says a lot about you.
Don't you really see these kinds of statements make the forum look bad?
No. It's what makes this forum great and unique! If you don't like it, you may want to go to a heavily censored SJW forum where your fragile feelings are protected. Bitcoin is about freedom, and you can't have freedom to say what you want without other people having the same freedom to say what they want. Grow a thicker skin or
choose to have a fragile ego hurt.
I'm pretty sure there are already texts that you don't like embedded in the Bitcoin blockchain. It's okay. You don't have to read it. Why would you even bother to read things on a website if it insults you?
How about if the admin filter some keywords(foul words), such that when you use them, you will be handed ban. Such as 7days ban, few days signature ban, read only mode etc. This will promote peaceful co-existence and curtail to the barest minimum any form of bullying, unfriendliness, acrimony or as the case may be.
I'm offended by your suggestion. Now you deserve a 7 day ban
You should spend 2.5 minutes to listen to
this guy: the only proper response to someone who says: "I'm offended!" is: "I don't care!".
Here's another 9 minutes worth of your time:
Rowan Atkinson on free speech.
For me, the best way to increase society's resistance to insulting or offensive speech is to allow a lot more of it. As with childhood diseases, you can better resist those germs to which you have been exposed. We need to build our immunity to taking offence, so that we can deal with the issues that perfectly justified criticism can raise. Our priority should be to deal with the message, not the messenger.
Did you notice how I completely ignored anything Satofan44 said? That's intentional: it's completely irrelevant to the discussion on freedom of speech.
Remember:
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -Voltaire*
@OP: What's your stance on Mia Chloe's feedback on Satofan44?
This is the biggest asshole I've seen on this forum moving around making stupid allegations. Avoid this retard.
Not only is it rude and abusive, it's also Trust abuse and if this stays red I'll exclude Mia Chloe from my Trust list.
Now that I'm on the subject: Kavelj22's feedback shouldn't be red either:
Accuse me and others irrelevant accusations. Has no clue how to use the trust system.
To be clear:
Satofan44's sent feedback is obvious large-scale Trust abuse, but he's so far excluded from DT that nobody cares anymore.
He's called me "LauraV" at least 3 times, including on my feedback page. His trolling is a waste of his technical knowledge, his contribution to the forum would have been much better without the drama.
10. Post 66153919 (unedited backup) (by bitwalhr) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 05:39:32 CET 2025) in Trump family earned $1B from crypto..:
Some of their earning went from pocket as well, Lost in trading of Trump and Melania coin, I purchased Melania coin when it launched thought it will pump like Trump coin, but instead going up to moon it went straight to hell
Regarding the Melania token, I also bought it shortly after its launch. And at the time, I was in a hurry to buy it. Because I thought the hype would be the same as Trump's. But it turned out I was wrong. Although it had a fairly high increase at the beginning, it only lasted for a short time and didn't last long, and then it experienced a continuous decline like a typical meme coin. Fortunately, I didn't buy much, because I had already prepared for such a situation.
It was clear from the beginning that this MelaniaCoin would not succeed for a good reason, which is that its counterpart cryptocurrency TrumpCoin was competing with it to attract more confident investors. Investors believed in TrumpCoin more than his wifeCoin because they knew she has nothing to do in the crypto field but to gather some benefits before running out, while they thought TrumpCoin would stay strong at least as long as Trump is in the white house.
Even many big ones are also fallen into this trap and faced loses because sometime peoples want to take risk, and they never thought about meme coin or shitcoin can go either way but with the Trump family in crypto now I have one view they have done good job because in near future if any big person will bring meme coin peoples surely will think and also done search about this before investing.
Trump family is surely taking good advantage of their power and influence this is giving them huge profit with now they are already having biggest ever mining system this is also going to be another big achievement in crypto 79 years old Trump doing for his family quickly.
11. Post 66153722 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 03:02:37 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
As for wagering requirement, i think it's a necessity for some good reasons. The users can't withdraw the amount he has just deposited without playing so that the casino doesn't turn to be a mixer to hide transaction traceability. And also the same thing applies with bonuses, there should be a minimum wager requirement for the reason not to abuse the bonus. Without the wager requirement the casino can be used as a mixer and can't lunch bonus programs which is a part of its marketing strategy to attract more users.
For the bonus wagering requirement, the most crucial part is that the players will abuse the bonus system, and the casino will go bankrupt without having any wagering requirement. Imagine a casino offering a bonus with no wagering requirements. I am sure the abusers will create multiple accounts to claim the wagering-free bonuses and try to withdraw them instantly on different addresses. They will use VPN and various devices so the casino cannot track them. The casino bonus without any wagering requirement doesn't fit at all. The casino will be forced to change the terms today or tomorrow.
12. Post 66150104 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Tue Dec 9 07:24:43 CET 2025) in 🔥 SunFireCasino.com 🔥 - A casino crafted by players for players 🎰♠️🎲:
It has been a while since your last update about automatic withdrawals and restrictions. Any improvement has been achieved since then?
I saw
your post in the Services board looking for community manager to join your team but with such a low budget which confirms that no much improvement after lunching the affiliate program. Being inactive for several weeks in bitcointalk with no updates would negatively impact the traffic and the quality of users in term of loyalty.
I noticed you are using more than one account as representative in bitcointalk. This is so confusing and unprofessional. You better stick with one official account for interacting with community and posting updates.
Their current marketing representative manages the SunFireAlge account, while other SunFire Casino staff members and the owner himself handle the SunFire Casino account. So the topic on the service board was probably created by the owner himself. I see no problem running multiple accounts if different departments handle these, provided the primary account confirms them. You can trust both of them, actually.
I have been in touch with the team for a while. However, I became somewhat busy with other jobs and did not follow up with the Sunfire team for months.
13. Post 66149165 (unedited backup) (by khaled0111) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 22:45:25 CET 2025) in 🔥 SunFireCasino.com 🔥 - A casino crafted by players for players 🎰♠️🎲:
It has been a while since your last update about automatic withdrawals and restrictions. Any improvement has been achieved since then?
I noticed you are using more than one account as representative in bitcointalk. This is so confusing and unprofessional. You better stick with one official account for interacting with community and posting updates.
This thread has been inactive for more than two months (which is not a good sign, btw), so I guess it’s the topic they created on the service board that brought you here!
I asked before about withdrawal delays and in their response they said that manual withdrawals would remain until the end of the summer. According to that, they should have switched to automated withdrawals by now. It would be helpful if OP or anyone who made a withdrawal recently could confirm this.
14. Post 66146888 (unedited backup) (by ultrloa) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 13:12:49 CET 2025) in SHOCK.COM | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK | 100% FIRST DEPOSIT MATCH BONUS:
I read your post twice to confirm the meaning and i think i understood your point very well. You say that it's fine to bypass the restriction by using a VPN, but without to mention the consequences a user will have to bear if catched. You might think they won't notice that someone is using a VPN however this becomes easier with developped tools that ever strict service should have, or when they doubt and ask for identity and residence verification.
No, you need to re-read his reply again because I’m pretty sure this is not what he was trying to say.
What he said is that, in most cases, it’s ok to use a VPN as long as you are not from a restricted country, because in that case you are, technically, not breaching the casino’s terms.
What he said is correct, because the use of VPNs is prohibited when it is used to hide your real location or, in other words, to bypass the geo-restriction.
I think i am not mistaken because why someone will chose to use a VPN if he is not in a restricted country, unless he is multi-accounting which is another restriction as well. It's not fine to use a VPN in a casino by all means because you risk to lose your funds once catched. Yes it's possible but it's not fine.
What SHOCK casino did to restrict login from restricted countries is great. I think there are no reasons for anybody to bypass the restrictions because he surely has other alternatives to chose from.
Its not always like that since user since people prefer to use that for privacy and security. But people need to check if they are really a VPN friendly casino since if it happens that they are not maybe they might get issue related to suspicious activities happening in their account.
But since this is usually been discourage to use by most of the casino I didn't use it anymore and just use my real IP. They are great for doing such restricting user to log in in their casino and this is what should be done by other casino to to avoid that bypassing issues.
15. Post 66146100 (unedited backup) (by AprilioMP) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 09:01:56 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
What I mean is this @Kavelj22
There are situations like fight in a casino and this may be a brutal one leading to a shutdown even before the government intervention, also, in some cases, the shutdown may com from government, but not because of their non compliance to their regulations like that of license, but government taking decisions to lock down a physical casino because of violence taken place in the casino, there could be cases of rape, theft, fight and so many others, just as we know can happen in a physical casino and the operators or government decided to shutdown activities there.
Illegal activities such as drugs to people fighting which result in people's lives being lost, then if it is interpreted that it is also because of regulations.
The casinos will probably deal with it but their efforts to shut down the casinos will not.
The closure will be carried out by the government because strict steps can be taken at this place which will cause inconvenience to residents.
I have never seen a physical casino close because I have never played in a casino like that, only spend time playing in online casinos, it is safe and not many people know my activities.
16. Post 66145514 (unedited backup) (by KeenanEl19) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 03:29:31 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
What I mean is this @Kavelj22
There are situations like fight in a casino and this may be a brutal one leading to a shutdown even before the government intervention, also, in some cases, the shutdown may com from government, but not because of their non compliance to their regulations like that of license, but government taking decisions to lock down a physical casino because of violence taken place in the casino, there could be cases of rape, theft, fight and so many others, just as we know can happen in a physical casino and the operators or government decided to shutdown activities there.
Even if a brutal brawl breaks out, I don't think a casino would shut down on its own. However, if the government did, it would make sense, even in a country where gambling is legal. I've never encountered such a case. I believe casinos that do shut down are those experiencing drastic bankruptcy, leaving them with no other option but to shut down and cease operations, whether temporarily or permanently. However, casinos should have had good security, so before a brawl broke out, their security would have been aware of the potential for further fighting and would have immediately taken action.
17. Post 66145223 (unedited backup) (by khaled0111) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 00:27:25 CET 2025) in SHOCK.COM | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK | 100% FIRST DEPOSIT MATCH BONUS:
I read your post twice to confirm the meaning and i think i understood your point very well. You say that it's fine to bypass the restriction by using a VPN, but without to mention the consequences a user will have to bear if catched. You might think they won't notice that someone is using a VPN however this becomes easier with developped tools that ever strict service should have, or when they doubt and ask for identity and residence verification.
No, you need to re-read his reply again because I’m pretty sure this is not what he was trying to say.
What he said is that, in most cases, it’s ok to use a VPN as long as you are not from a restricted country, because in that case you are, technically, not breaching the casino’s terms.
What he said is correct, because the use of VPNs is prohibited when it is used to hide your real location or, in other words, to bypass the geo-restriction.
18. Post 66144917 (unedited backup) (by Russlenat) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 23:13:19 CET 2025) in SHOCK.COM | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK | 100% FIRST DEPOSIT MATCH BONUS:
This whole VPN thing has become extremely complicated in the world of crypto gambling if you ask me. Easiest explanation here is that it's totally fine using a VPN if the country is not restricted by the site itself.
I read your post twice to confirm the meaning and i think i understood your point very well. You say that it's fine to bypass the restriction by using a VPN, but without to mention the consequences a user will have to bear if catched. You might think they won't notice that someone is using a VPN however this becomes easier with developped tools that ever strict service should have, or when they doubt and ask for identity and residence verification.
Yeah, it’s totally fine for us right now because we can access it. They probably notice it, but they won’t mind unless we start winning big. That’s when the problem starts. Maybe the people who say using a VPN is fine just haven’t won anything big yet, so their experience feels normal. They don’t realize the possible consequences.
It’s the same thing as playing on a KYC casino. We think everything is okay because they don’t ask for KYC at first. But once we hit a big win, that’s when they suddenly require it. And if we’re not prepared, we lose our chance to enjoy that big payout.
19. Post 66141920 (unedited backup) (by Ishicryptic) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 06:45:14 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
What I mean is this @Kavelj22
There are situations like fight in a casino and this may be a brutal one leading to a shutdown even before the government intervention, also, in some cases, the shutdown may com from government, but not because of their non compliance to their regulations like that of license, but government taking decisions to lock down a physical casino because of violence taken place in the casino, there could be cases of rape, theft, fight and so many others, just as we know can happen in a physical casino and the operators or government decided to shutdown activities there.
If a casino shutdown it's activities due to violence it should be on a temporary basis, so far they didn't commit any crimes that warrants government to shut it down permanently. Another understandable reason why a physical casino will permanently shutdown is due to regular attacks by robbers or recurring cases of violence in their location. But I know that the major reason why a casino will shutdown will be due to bankruptcy or the government shutdown due to their misconduct or regulation breach. Casinos cannot just shutdown due to problems, they will try and resolve it it and continue with their business.
20. Post 66141332 (unedited backup) (by Agbamoni) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 00:11:55 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
If it's not for license/regulations or bankruptcy reasons, what should be the reason in your opinion OP? Usually physical casinos shut down their activities because of confirmed accusations of fraud or money laundering involvement which are all under regulations category. I can't understand what do you mean by saying shut down because of violence. If players fight against each other the casino can't operate, unless you refer to illegal locations. Better to avoid going to those locations because you will be exposed to many risks including losing your whole life.
Apart from money laundering and drug abuse, some physical casinos engage in human trafficking. At the same time, some serve as a den for incubating criminals and their arms. Let us be realistic, a lot can literally go on in a physical casino, and most of them pay the governments to cover up their crimes. Once they are exposed, they completely shut down.
21. Post 66141042 (unedited backup) (by Slow death) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 22:51:07 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
What I mean is this @Kavelj22
There are situations like fight in a casino and this may be a brutal one leading to a shutdown even before the government intervention, also, in some cases, the shutdown may com from government, but not because of their non compliance to their regulations like that of license, but government taking decisions to lock down a physical casino because of violence taken place in the casino, there could be cases of rape, theft, fight and so many others, just as we know can happen in a physical casino and the operators or government decided to shutdown activities there.
These types of cases, however sad they may be, do not lead to the casino being closed, because the fight involved casino customers and not the casino owner. Therefore, when the police investigate these types of cases, they will only punish the individuals who were fighting, and the casino's operations will continue without problems. Only in cases of money laundering, drug trafficking, trafficking of women, men, or children directly involving the casino owner and casino employees is discovered will the court close the casino and punish the owners. In this scenario, the government revokes the casino's license, and only if the casino is sold to other owners would the government allow it to operate again.
22. Post 66141028 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 22:48:55 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
What I mean is this @Kavelj22
There are situations like fight in a casino and this may be a brutal one leading to a shutdown even before the government intervention, also, in some cases, the shutdown may com from government, but not because of their non compliance to their regulations like that of license, but government taking decisions to lock down a physical casino because of violence taken place in the casino, there could be cases of rape, theft, fight and so many others, just as we know can happen in a physical casino and the operators or government decided to shutdown activities there.
And what is your point? If a Casino shuts down due to a violence breaking out, it is not my business or yours and has no thing to do with anybody except the people involved. Unfortunately a lot of the big businesses have big names involved who may not be good people. It is what it is, they are always present where a lot of Money is involved.
23. Post 66140978 (unedited backup) (by Fiatless) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 22:33:07 CET 2025) in Casino Shutdown :
What I mean is this @Kavelj22
There are situations like fight in a casino and this may be a brutal one leading to a shutdown even before the government intervention, also, in some cases, the shutdown may com from government, but not because of their non compliance to their regulations like that of license, but government taking decisions to lock down a physical casino because of violence taken place in the casino, there could be cases of rape, theft, fight and so many others, just as we know can happen in a physical casino and the operators or government decided to shutdown activities there.
Disagreements that sometimes leads to quarrels and fights happens sometimes in physical betting shops. One of the reasons is that these gamblers place unofficial bets among themselves which could lead ro conflict. If you are there when fights break out, seek for means to leave the premises to avoid becoming a victim.of stray punch or dangerous weapons.
If these fights becomes constant or turns violent, shutting the betting place is a good opinion.
Avoiding physical casinos might be a good means of not becoming a victim. There are variety of online casinos that offer thesame services. Another measure will be visiting well managed physical casinos that has active security personnel on ground.
24. Post 66140337 (unedited backup) (by jeremypwr) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 19:38:37 CET 2025) in 1Win English Premier League Scorecast Matchweek 15:
I see 5 newbie accounts posting out of 18 total posts because there is no rule requirement rank. This opens the door to alt abuse because someone with 3 alt accounts can submit 4 predictions that rise his chance to win. Easy to create casino accounts using different IPs from different devices (wife,friend,son,brother...).
You make a valid point; not sure why any legit account would even waste their time with this (almost certain) blatant collusion...
25. Post 66137567 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 03:13:37 CET 2025) in اختراق منصة “Upbit” بقيمة 37 مليون دولار:
المصيبةانه لا يوجد تعريف واضح لهذه المجموعة,في البدايةيمكننا القول بان المجموعة قد تكون حقيقة وقدتكون نشطة ولكن من الصعب القول بانها وراء كل عملية اختراق, لدرجة ان اي احتيال اصبح يربطبها تلقائيا وبما ان كوريا الشمالية لاتهتم عادة بالرد علي الاتهمامات (بل بالعكس هكذا اتماهمات مفيدة لهم) فاعتقد ان الحكومات اصبحت تشير لهذه المجموعة مع كل حالة احتيال لا يمكن حلها.
لذلك فالحكومات مستفيدة حيث انهم سيقولون اننا لن نتمكن من ايقاف هذه الهجمات طالما انها من كوريا الشمالية. (لاحظ انه لا توجد ادله تشير لتطور كبير لهذه الدولة وحتي لوقرروا بيع البيتكوين اوغسيل الاموال سيكون صعبا عليهم)
اعتقد ان الامر اعقد بكثير من مجرد اتهامات يتم اطلاقها عشوائيا لمجموعة لازاروس فلتبرير الاخفاقات، خصوصا بان الاتهامات لا تصدر فقط من حكومات او هيئات رقابية، بل من شركات تحليل البيانات التي لديها ما يكفي من الخبرة و الاليات للتعرف على ما اذا كانت جهة بعينها هي من قامت بعملية الاختراق. حسب ما وجدته في عملية البحث فان هناك طريقة معتمدة تسمى "Attribution" و الذي يقوم على رصد ادلة تقنية و تشغيلية بما يشكل نمط معين يمكن ربطه بجهة معينة كلما تكرر. هذه الطريقة تعتمد على:
- مراقبة عقد الدخول و الخروج (entry/exit nodes)
- تحليل حركة الشبكات المشبوهة بما ان البرامج الخبيثة تتواصل مع الخوادم حتى اذا كانت تستهدف الشبكات اللامركزية.
- التركيز على الطرفيات Endpoints
- الذكاء الاصطناعي و تحليل سلوكات البيانات
و النقطة المهمة هي التعاون و التكامل بين مختلف الشركات الامنية الكبرى لتكون عملية الرصد سريعة و دقيقة و لا ننسى ان هناك بيانات تشاركية بين تلك الشركات و وكالات حكومية مثل fbi تسمى "مؤشرات اختراق" (IOCs).
أخي الكريم يمكن لشركات تحليل البيانات معرفة ومراقبة العناوين المعروفة التي تعود لشخصيات مشهورة مثل ساتوشي أو بعض الحيتان وكذلك المنصات المعروفة لأن هناك ارتباط معروف بين هذه العناوين وهذه الجهات وفيما عدا ذلك كيف ستتمكن هذه الشركات من معرفة أن المبلغ المسروق ذهب لجهة معينة وخاصة أن الهاكرز يسعون بكل الوسائل لإفاء هويتهم وخلط الأصول التي يسرقونها.
أما من ناحية النمط المتكرر فهو ممكن نوعا ما لكنه يوجه علامة استفهام كبيرة إذا كانوا يعرفون النمط الذي تتبعه مجموعة لازروس فلماذا لايتخذون الخطوات الأمنية الكافية لسد الثغرات المحتملة بما أن النمط متكرر فهم يستخدمون نفس الأساليب وبالتالي هذا فشل أمني كبير!!!
26. Post 66137252 (unedited backup) (by salad daging) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 00:02:49 CET 2025) in 2UP | No-KYC Crypto Casino & Bitcoin Sportsbook | Fast Withdrawals + 200% Bonus:
I couldn’t believe that all 15 of my free spins won, until my total winnings reached $3000. I thought I was using a demo account because I couldn’t believe it. In the end, I realized that the casino was just a scam, which was annoying because when I tried to withdraw my winnings, the casino asked me to deposit $100. That’s when I realized the platform was a scam, so I immediately logged out and deactivated my account there. That’s why it’s still better to gamble at reputable casinos.
Winning in all the free spins at the point to reach $3000, this is so good to be true that rise a lot of red flags about the platform to be a confirmed scam even before they ask you to deposit $100 to withdraw $3000. And if you deposit that $100 they will continue asking for more deposits. It's even worse than playing in demo account which at least won't let you win all the spins.
What's ironically pathetic is that there are many users leaded by greediness who easily fall victims of those scam schemes. And they don't even bother themselves to ask experienced users. Ignorance plus greediness can lead to disasters.
The casino platform asks users to deposit $100 this is like an investment platform only, because what I know is that legitimate casinos usually ask to fulfill wagered first and then withdraw but if such a scenario is clearly fraud.
Victims who fall for seeing the $3000 number in their account is what they are after even though they have to sacrifice $100 as a ransom.
If we realize it should be a scam but sometimes there are people who don't think this is not like a scam.