Last update: 2025-12-20_Sat_16.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Kavelj22 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Kavelj22
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Kavelj22" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66194618 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Fri Dec 19 23:57:25 CET 2025) in ميتاماسك تضيف دعم بيتكوين الأصلي:
...
للامانة، محفظة ميتاماسك محفظة جيدة جدا و فيها كل الميزات التي يبحث عنها اي مستخدم للعملات الرقمية. كما ذكرت، كانت المحفظة الرئيسية التي استخدمها في السابق. لكن بعد الحادثة التي وقعت قبل بضعة سنوات (لا اتذكر التاريخ تحديدا) و التي اشار لها التخ يحيى، لم اعد اثق فيها و في مطوريها و لا استطيع ان اشجع اي شخص على استعمالها كمحفظته الاساسية رغم ما توفره من مميزات.
اشاركك الراي نفسه اخي خالد، ومن وجهة نظري، الاحتفاظ بجميع عملاتك في محفظة متصلة بمتصفح ليس امنا ابدا.
نسخة الهاتف افضل بكتير من ناحية الامان، لكنني اعتقد ان اغلب المستخدمين يعتمدون على نسخة المتصفح، والكتير منهم لا يملكون الخبرة الكافية لتجنب الوقوع في فخ مواقع web3 الاحتيالية التي تقوم بتفريغ المحافظ.
شخصيا، لا اعيد تتبيت المحفظة و استعمالها الا عند الضرورة القصوى، متل الدفع في بعض المواقع التي تفرض عليك ربط المحفظة لاتمام العملية، وهو امر اكرهه جدا.
2. Post 66194310 (unedited backup) (by nutildah) (scraped on Fri Dec 19 22:46:55 CET 2025) in [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread:
What's the goal of this giveaway dude? Are you a team member trying to revive the coin or what? I can't figure out how you can verify that users posting their addresses were using counterparty before more than five years!
Well, I'll tell you. You take a peek at the contents of their wallet using a Counterparty-enabled block explorer. For example, this is the address in my profile, I don't mind sharing it, its where I keep most of my Counterparty token collection.
https://tokenscan.io/address/1864jXLSdbZq319oQScCNG1m7nLYbGHuBXIf the wallet has any token activity that is 5 years old or older, then its legit.
Yes, you're wrong and you don't have any understanding of what you're talking about. Thanks for the drive-by shitpost.
3. Post 66187999 (unedited backup) (by Porfirii) (scraped on Thu Dec 18 13:09:07 CET 2025) in [AOBT] THE ALLIANCE OF BITCOINTALK TRANSLATORS:
Hey Porf,
I saw that an
Arabic translation was made for TalkSearch thread.
Can you add it to our list, please?
Done! thank you Gazeta
Heads-up gang
joker_josue just posted an update with the statistics for November and he
asked us to update our translations again. So this should be in the attention of
roksana.hee DS, Peanutswar, cygan, mindrust, dansus021, Porf, zasad@, Kavelj22, JunaidAzizi, Chilwell, M47AK16 and ovcijisir.
Also, the ones which did not do
the earlier updates, please apply them as well...
Porf, will you notify the non-AOBTers, as usual...?
Hello AOBT Fam,
Just want to inform i'm done with the updates. Currently having a progress with the pending translation.
Good job Peanutswar. I know that you're a busy man and your efforts are highly valued ^^
I hope to be able to catch up a bit too this weekend.
4. Post 66186796 (unedited backup) (by TastyChillySauce00) (scraped on Thu Dec 18 05:13:31 CET 2025) in Adoption of Stablecoins:
I use stablecoins for everyday payments in small transactions since many locals know about USDT and start using it. I trust the use of USDT but not the USDT itself. For all the reasons, it can't be the safest way to store many for a ling period as investment
Understandable and honestly I did the same to some extent. The fact that we can create a swap route from bitcoin to stablecoin settlement on-chain using bridges etc means there's potential here for bitcoin payment to be widely adopted even if it needs to be swapped to stablecoin first.
Using that there will be no risk because we don't really hold stablecoin, it's processed by the payment gateway services providers.
We're actually in golden era of interoperability between chains right now. Like, literally you can swap anything and get it on the other side of the other chain.
5. Post 66184328 (unedited backup) (by Peanutswar) (scraped on Wed Dec 17 15:40:31 CET 2025) in [AOBT] THE ALLIANCE OF BITCOINTALK TRANSLATORS:
Heads-up gang
joker_josue just posted an update with the statistics for November and he
asked us to update our translations again. So this should be in the attention of
roksana.hee DS, Peanutswar, cygan, mindrust, dansus021, Porf, zasad@, Kavelj22, JunaidAzizi, Chilwell, M47AK16 and ovcijisir.
Also, the ones which did not do
the earlier updates, please apply them as well...
Porf, will you notify the non-AOBTers, as usual...?
Hello AOBT Fam,
Just want to inform i'm done with the updates. Currently having a progress with the pending translation.
6. Post 66179834 (unedited backup) (by Finebone) (scraped on Tue Dec 16 14:07:55 CET 2025) in 💧 Rainbet.com 💧 | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Competitive Rewards 💦:
Odds are calculated based on assumption according to the choice of users about who might has the more chance to win. When comparing odds between different gambling platforms, it's clear how much they are closer like they are set by the same entity. Who will win the match? Indeed, nobody can tell exactly. And placing a bet based on offered odds, is so misleading. Who knows what alghoritms are used to calculate odds? Especially for live match betting.
What I knew about odds is that the bookmarkers are the ones in charge of odds, and these gambling casinos follows suit by issuing out anything they decides, what am a bit curious about is how the odds is being decide when games are on, as you have said earlier, just like the live games, because you might gamble on a football game to play over 2.5, but as the time progresses while the game is on, if they have not scored any goal yet, the odds keeps on increasing, and when goals start coming the odds will start shrinking or depreciating, so i am just curious to know who are in charge of the changes that happens to the odds in the casino when games are on, is it the bookmakers or it's the casino?
7. Post 66178805 (unedited backup) (by BlackBaron) (scraped on Tue Dec 16 08:27:13 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
In this context, it seems to be talking about bonuses and wagering requirements that must be completed for the bonus money to become our money.
Actually, such high requirements I also find it difficult to achieve, but considering this is a bonus so the casino has the right to make such policies. On the other hand as a user, I think we also have the right to negotiate a little although the final result is still the casino who decides.
I would have much more reservations if the terms being discussed here were about our deposit money and we had to reach such a large wagering requirement. And I guess it makes sense that we would object so much.
Requiring a wagering for deposits is mandatory because to forbid users from using the casino as a mixer because without the wagering requirement, someone can deposit and withdraw without placing bets to get a new fresh coins. Users have nothing to discuss about deposit wagering requirement and we don't negotiate about it that much.
Our discussion is not to enforce casinos to make change in the bonus system because they are free to set the minimum they think good for their benefits, but to let users know this is a trap more than a bonus.
Yes, it means that what I said earlier is true that it is a must for kasiono to set wagering requirements for deposit money because it can prevent unwanted things, one of which is money laundering or whatever it is called.
But on the other hand, saying that a bonus with high wagering requirements or the bonus itself is a trap is not wise in my opinion. Because what will determine whether we will take the bonus or not is ourselves, I even often miss bonuses that should be obtained. And bonuses are actually a form of promotion, is promotion the same as a trap?
8. Post 66175352 (unedited backup) (by Finebone) (scraped on Mon Dec 15 14:13:37 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
I have already made peace with it that these bonuses target are set so high so that it can't be reached easily, that is why I only faces what makes me to gamble, not the bonuses that are difficult to unlock.
Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.
I just think that the earlier we accept the reality the better, it's left for you or others to try your best if you can unlucky the bonus that seems impossible or just forget about it because left for me, it's a trap to milk you as a gambler. You will see yourself losing like $100 in the process of trying to unluck a $30 bonus, don't that sounds crazy?
9. Post 66175329 (unedited backup) (by BlackBaron) (scraped on Mon Dec 15 14:06:25 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:
I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.
Reasonable for what or according to whom? I think that’s the question you need to think of and try to answer.
Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
It won't be reasonable for someone who used to accept rules as facts superior above critics. I am not the only one who think this way, already other users in this discussion share the same idea.
Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.
Being a commun standard between all casinos doesn't make it right.
In this context, it seems to be talking about bonuses and wagering requirements that must be completed for the bonus money to become our money.
Actually, such high requirements I also find it difficult to achieve, but considering this is a bonus so the casino has the right to make such policies. On the other hand as a user, I think we also have the right to negotiate a little although the final result is still the casino who decides.
I would have much more reservations if the terms being discussed here were about our deposit money and we had to reach such a large wagering requirement. And I guess it makes sense that we would object so much.
10. Post 66173816 (unedited backup) (by TastyChillySauce00) (scraped on Mon Dec 15 02:44:01 CET 2025) in Adoption of Stablecoins:
I wouldn't call those stablecoins as cryptocurrencies just because they are listed in cryptocurrency exchanges or recognized by some entities. USD backed tokens have nothing to share with the main concept of cryptocurrencies as defined by Satoshi when inventing the Bitcoin. They are fiat backed cryptocurrencies which means they have value derived from fiat money and this is the main reason why they are called stable (which is not true stability). In addition to it could be frozen by the devs who invented it, which makes it riskier than any other cryptocurrency in the crypto industry.
PayPal recognizes stablecoins, or youtube use them to pay content creators, all of them couldn't make those called stablecoins as real cryptocurrencies. They are just a crypto form of fiat money.
It's true that it's not a real crypto. if we're going deeper into the technical aspect, It's not even a proper coin but just smart contract code living in the blockchain. It's basically just an ERC20 token but regardless stablecoin being accepted by many companies means we can easily create a swap route that uses real crypto like ETH to make settlement in purchase to a merchant that accept stablecoin.
It's an indirect crypto adoption because it opens up another route. You basically don't need to withdraw to bank and add another middleman fee. That's why this adoption could be beneficial for crypto as well although we know stablecoin isn't real crypto.
11. Post 66170058 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Sun Dec 14 03:03:37 CET 2025) in عنوان بيتكوين طويل:
بينانس اذا لديها اكثر من خاصية في ما يخص المحفظات و ايضا توفر محافظ بخصائص متطورة. انا ايضا اشك بمدى مصداقية هذه التطبيقات و عموما انا لم اكن اعتقد بوجودها باي شكل خصوصا على منصة مركزية مهما كان نوع الضمانات.
بلى أخي هذه المحفظة اللامركزية موجودة على بينانس وأنا أنشأت واحدة وجربتها وهناك أيضا خيار لاستيراد البذرة وأنا قمت باختيار هذا الخيار وجاءني تحذير أنه إذا اخترت هذا الخيار فبينانس لم تعد تتحمل مسؤولية حماية هذه المحفظة وعليك أن تقوم بحفظها أنت.
أيضا يمكنك استخدام هذه المحفظة للتداول اللامركزي على المحفظة مباشرة على شبكات مثل BSC , SOL, Base والعملات التي تشتريها هنا منفصلة عن حسابك على بينانس ولاتظهر إلأ بالدخول إلى هذه المحفظة.
رغم أن المحفظة تبدو لامركزية تماما ويمكنك استيراد البذرة إلى أي محفظة أخرى لكن كما ذكرت أنا تبقى تراودني شكوك حول بينانس بسبب مركزيتها ولأنها أصبحت كالأخبوط تسيطر على خدمات كثيرة.