في رأيي نفس الشئ يمكن قوله على معظم المشاريع في عالم العملات المشفرة التي رأيناها في الأعوام الأخيرة سواء كانت L2s لمساعدة الاثريوم أو L1. خذ مثلا هذا المقال[1][2] أين يمكننا أن نرى بموضوح أين قامت العديد من المشاريع بجمع عشرات أو مئات ملايين الدولارات و في الأخيرة، الشبكات بالكاد تولد مئات الدولارات في الرسوم (يعني لا يوجد أي مستخدمين)

[1] https://protos.com/these-crypto-chains-raised-500m-but-generate-just-360-in-daily-fees-1/
[2] https://x.com/stacy_muur/status/2077034818450432412

نقطة قوية - هل يقدر سارق ذكي يزيف مسبقا مصدر امواله، او قصة بديلة، قبل ما يطلب السحب؟ مو بس الضحية اللي راح يقدم ادلة، بل حتى السارق يقدر يقدم ادلة مزيفة. يعني عبء اثبات الحق مو دايما يقع بس على الضحية؟ نقطة فعلا مثيرة للاهتمام وما فكرت فيها من قبل. بالنسبة لي، يبدو ان عمر الحساب له علاقة كبيرة بمدى سرعة استجابة المنصة، ومدى تجاوبهم معك بالبداية، بس بمجرد ما تثبت التهمة، ما راح يقدم له أي حماية.

يا رجل، كثييير تغيرت وجهة نظري السابقة بعد كلامك. تسلم على الشرح! بعض الاشياء اللي استخلصتها:

• ذكر البلد لا يلغي فورا إمكانية التفاوض.
• هناك المزيد من التعقيدات والمناطق الرمادية في هذه القضايا مما أدركت. قد يكون من الممكن التفاوض في هذا السيناريو حتى لو لم يكن هناك تقرير شرطة نموذجي.
• حساب جديد يطلب مبلغاً كبيراً في P2P في يومه الأول ربما يواجه صعوبة أكبر من حساب له سجل طويل وخالٍ من العيوب. بعبارة أخرى، السجل والائتمان مهمان لـ P2P، وهم يتعاملون مع النزاعات بشكل مختلف اعتماداً على تاريخ المستخدمين.

We operate in the B2B space, but we wouldn’t be against bringing in an investor to help us scale and grow the business further.

لا اتفكر صراحة لكن متأكد أنني تعرضت الخسارة فادحة. وقتها ربما
اذا كنت أتذكر بشكل جيد، ربما تمت شرفة اكثر من ستة عشر الف دولار من محفظتي.

هههه صراحة القصة ترجع ل2017 اخي، مين بيتذكر عنوان من زمان مثل هذا اصلا، حتى الايميل اللي كنت مسجل فيه بالمنصة تغير من زمان.

بس خلك بالفكرة، اذا قدرت الاقيه بأي مكان محفوظ (نسخة احتياطية قديمة او شي زي كذا) بجرب اتاكد من موضوع الفوركات اللي حكيت عنه. حاليا ما عندي وقت افتش، بس الفكرة عالقة براسي الحين.

بخصوص الجهاز فللاسف ما فيه شي يرجع، كسرته كسر خلاص.



هههه يا اخي مرحبا فينا كلنا بهالنادي، بس صراحة اذا خسارتك اكبر من نص بيتكوين وقتها هذا شي مؤلم فعلا، مو شي بسيط تتجاوزه بسهولة.

شكرا على العرض بس ما اعتقد في شي ممكن يرجع الوضع، القصة خلصت من زمان وانا تصالحت معها. المهم ناخذ منها عبرة ونصير احرص بالمستقبل، هذا اللي يهمني اكثر من محاولة استرجاع شي راح من سنين.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5451159.msg67121642#msg67121642
klarki, thanks!

   
   
Re: JACK.COM | 🎰Crypto Casino & ⚽️Sportsbook | 100 Free Spins + Sports Welcome Pack
Today at 01:58:27 PM
Reply with quote Edit message Delete message  +Merit  #32
Quote from: Joy- maker on Today at 12:44:19 PM
Quote from: JACK.COM on Today at 09:15:55 AM
Hello Bitcointalk community !

It’s great to see your interest in JACK.COM, and we’re happy to answer any questions you may have. We’ll do our best to be as open and transparent as possible.

First, I’d like to talk about our rebranding from Jackbit to JACK.COM. The rebranding was completed several months ago, but it was much more than simply changing the name and design. We took the opportunity to improve the platform on a deeper, system-wide level, with the goal of making the overall experience smoother, safer, and more comfortable for our users. In fact, the rebranding itself took a huge amount of effort on our side. We worked hard to make it clear to everyone that JACK.COM is the rebranding of Jackbit, not a new casino. We have never had any intention of hiding this, quite the opposite.

We’re active across social media and various forums, where we try to maintain open communication with our community and protect the reputation we’ve built over the years. Of course, as with any casino, there are also people who intentionally post negative comments or try to damage a brand’s reputation, but we believe our history and the way we handle our users speak for themselves.

Regarding Jackbit and its previous account, as you may know, there are several platforms such as Casino Guru, AskGamblers, and others where our history and previous cases are still visible. We have not created new accounts on these platforms to hide our history, in fact, the existing cases are there, and they have all been successfully resolved.

We have never scammed anyone under the Jackbit name, nor did we create a new account in order to hide negative comments or past issues. Quite the opposite, we want to remain active across forums and communities and maintain direct communication with our users. All cases on our old account have also been resolved, if you come across anything you have questions about, feel free to drop it here and I’ll be happy to answer.

We originally submitted an official request to change the name of our old Bitcointalk account, but the process kept getting delayed indefinitely. Rather than waiting any longer, we decided to create a new official account under JACK.COM so that we could continue being active here and stay close to the Bitcointalk community.

Following these updates, we’ve also expanded our team with many new members, and we continue to work every day to provide our users with the best possible experience in the market.
We’re here to build on what we already have, not to hide our past.
I'm really impressed with this comment and I appreciate your transparency, when I first received your Ann thread notification from my telegram bot I thought jack.com was a new casino, but I later realized it was a rebrand.

However, welcome back to the forum and it's good to have you here again, from what I have read so far, jackbit didn't scam anyone, they were accused and the accusations has simply been resolved.

I hope you continue to be transparent, genuine, trustworthy, reliable to your users, as those qualities are what help build long term trust and confidence within the community.

Does rebranding mean hiding the old brand from your perspective? I honestly don’t understand what you’re asking us.

Rebranding is about innovation, improvement, development, and moving forward. We rebranded because everything needs to evolve and move forward.
As for the complaints from the old account, we have successfully resolved all of them. You can also check our accounts on AskGamblers or Casino Guru, those are not new accounts, we simply changed the name directly and the entire history is visible.

Rebranding cannot help them, since their old cases will chase them up and people will continue to raise their concern about the past situation happened to them.

So maybe before thinking about doing all of this things. Much better for them to pay attention first on their past issues.

Because for sure that they are just wasting their time and also their resources for making this changes. Because for sure people will not adapt their new brand and other offerings if they know that they had bad past,  then many people still chasing for resolution of their old issue.

Rebrand or don't rebrand, if there are valid accusations that have yet been resolved by the previous brand company, it's best to take resources from time to finance for resolving those cases. Even if the company thought these cases are invalid, it's time to prove that fact before moving onward with a new brand. If cases are valid, resolving them will be like mandatory in order to move onward with good reputation for a new brand.

Because people in community can quickly find information links two brands together and they will have doubt about not-yet-resolved accusations.

We understand that some trading platforms do stuff like that. So the preventive measure is to create a new address separate from your main balance. This is for those of us who understand, but most people don’t do this and end up regretting it. Anything related to personal wallets shouldn’t be easily trusted on every site. If it can be avoided, just avoid it. There are still many other platforms that are more trusted and credible. Still, in the end, we all need to take precautions beforehand, which is using a new address when connecting with third parties. Even after 10 years of knowing crypto, I've never connected my personal wallet with a third party.

They can continue with this thread or a new one, both is acceptable but to avoid confusion, they can lock this thread by request sent to forum moderator. Many casinos no longer moderate their announcement threads with OPs but with other accounts. Possible the founders are no longer active in Bitcoin forum or access to OP accounts lost and they did not recover that or similar reason to Goated team.

It's not allowed.
One thread per site ONLY.

Thanks once more for the heads-up, joker_josue

I just updated the Romanian translation.

الرابط اللي جبته وضح كتير الصورة صراحة، شكرا عليه.

بس خلاني افكر بنقطة، اذا كانت المنصة نفسها محجوزة عند السلطات وكل البيانات موجودة عندهم، ليش محتاجين اصلا اثبات ملكية اضافي من المستخدم؟ يعني لو سجلات المنصة نفسها فيها اسم صاحب كل محفظة او بريده الالكتروني وقت التسجيل، هذا كافي نظريا، الا اذا كانت هذي البيانات غير موثوقة او ناقصة من الاساس بسبب قدمها.

وبخصوص البائعين اللي حطوا بيتكوين من محافظهم مباشرة، فعلا وضعهم اصعب بكثير، لان اثبات انك انت صاحب عنوان معين على البلوكتشين من سنة 2012 شبه مستحيل الا اذا كنت حافظ على مفاتيحك الخاصة القديمة وين ما كانت.

August's Statistics Data for TalkImg is made available by joker_josue.

So this should be in the attention of DS, GazetaBitcoin, Porfirii, Peanutswar, cygan, mindrust, dansus021, mindrust, zasad@, Kavelj22, JunaidAzizi, Chilwell, M47AK16 and ovcijisir.

Guys, please update your corresponding local translations with newer data.  

 
 Statistics  August 2026____________________
In the latest statistics update, it was possible to notice an unusually low number of views for the most viewed images. It should be noted that, since Cloudflare is used, any changes to the server may cause a difference in how traffic reaches the site. That's what happened; I had made some adjustments that resulted in the information reaching the server being more limited. Faced with this situation, I went back to review the settings and try to understand how I could improve them in order to obtain a result closer to reality.

As you know, TalkImg was designed for Bitcointalk, so traffic via the forum's image proxy has priority on the server without restrictions. Although it is not creating major barriers to its use in other locations, the priority is forum. With that in mind, I managed to make some adjustments to the settings to further improve access to the forum. This allowed us to improve the statistics on forum access to TalkImg.

Therefore, this month we will see very different numbers than what we have seen over the past few months. Still, we'll only know for sure if the numbers are being entered correctly in a month or two, to validate whether they make sense or not. But, at first glance, it seems so.

I would also like to take this opportunity to explain again how this image ranking works. The statistics system analyzes all the queries that the forum's image proxy performs. It checks the number of times an image link is requested. To ensure that all images have the same exposure time, it checks the images uploaded in the previous month. In other words, for example this month, we'll look at the most viewed images in August that were uploaded in July.

One final note: we remind you that TalkImg is a platform where NSFW images, illegal content, or content that promotes illegal activities are prohibited.


Here are the numbers for the month:

	Number of uploads in the month:  7 982 (+181 that in the last month)
	Total disk space in the month:  3.11GB (-0.02 that in the last month)
	Number of visits to the talkimg.com website in the month: 1 823 008*  Estimated number of times images were viewed on the forum in the month (hits): 5 898 861*  Bandwidth in the month: 882.31GB* *This data may not represent total/real numbers, because of Cloudflare.

Top 10 Images Viewed
The 10 images viewed (estimated) this month, which were uploaded in the previous month.

#01 1795 views

#02 1782 views

#03 1346 views

#04 1345 views

#05 1345 views

#06 1344 views

#07 1344 views

#08 1344 views

#09 1341 views

#10 1337 views

من فهمي للخبر الاصلي، اغلب الظن يقصدون كشف حساب بنكي يوضح انه حول فلوس لحساب المنصة بنفس التاريخ اللي تم فيه شراء البيتكوين، يعني اثبات تدفق الفلوس مش توثيق الهوية وقت التسجيل.

نقطة السابقة القانونية اللي ذكرتها معك فيها كتير، بس شخصيا اشوف الموضوع مرتبط بمين استلم القضية اكثر من الدولة نفسها، يعني لو شركة محاماة خاصة زي هذي عندها الادوات وقررت تاخذ القضية بمبادرتها هي، ما تحتاج بالضرورة غطاء من هيئة رقابية معينة عشان تفتح ملفات مشابهة، بس طبعا محدودية وصولها لبيانات المنصات المقفلة او خارج ولايتها القضائية تبقى عائق حقيقي زي ما قلت.

فعلا كنت سأسأل نفس السؤال لأنه أول شيء لفت انتباهي عند قراءة الموضوع؟
التفسير الوحيد أخي كما ذكرت أنه قام بشراء البيتكوين من حسابه البنكي عن طريق المنصة وبالتالي ستكون سجل المعاملات البنكية وسجل البلوكتشاين أيضا لايزال موجود وبالتالي يمكن إثبات الشراء والإيداع
لكن ماذا عن الأشخاص الذين قاموا بإيداع البيتكوين مباشرة من محفظتهم إلى المنصة؟

القصة طريفة وغريبة في نفس الوقت يعني كيف بقيت هذه المحفظة التي تحوي 5500 بيتكوين كل هذه السنين دون أن يمسها أحد خاصة أن الشركة أفلست وأغلقت؟ يعني لماذا لم يبيعوا البيتكوين وقتها؟ هل كانت المحفظة منسية أو مفاتيحها مفقودة وتم استعادتها لاحقا؟

Fair point, and I actually agree with it, so I just went and extended it. The domain's now registered through August 2030, not a single year. Whois should reflect it shortly once it updates.

Honestly it was just me moving fast at launch, not some exit plan, but you're right that a one-year reg sends the wrong signal. Fixed now. Appreciate you flagging it, that's the kind of feedback that actually makes this thread worth having.

As I wrote in the post above yours, all companies registered in Costa Rica can be confirmed on the official Costa Rican National Registry website (Registro Nacional de Costa Rica): https://www.rnpdigital.com/
The company registered under number 3-102-969810 exists:



The above information is available for free. Detailed information, including physical address, must be purchased for a small fee on the same website.

I think there is a concern here. A gambling project ought to be particularly cautious in advancement because employing created or poor quality records can cause individuals to question the legitimacy of the entire project. If there's a project with a good signature campaign already in place. There's no need to have a few in active or suspicious accounts to drive up discussion. This would be much more believable if people who actually used the product had their experience shared. And had a natural voice from the established members. However I also believe it's important to differentiate between criticizing the practice of having casino's in general and accusing this casino without proof. If there is no proof that POWER.If WIN is actually using shillers it is better to make the discussion about the method of promotion. Not assume anything or assume that they do not use shillers.

True, I find any gambling project using shillers to promote their casinos to be weird. I'm not saying this casino is into something like that, but I can't imagine, after paying Hero rank and above a fair budget to wear their signatures, any need for bot accounts to start promoting the same project. Using poor and inactive accounts to shill a project only makes the project look less attractive and might harm the reputation of the project.