وفقًا لتقرير نُشر اليوم، بلغ إجمالي سرقات العملات المشفرة التي قامت بها كوريا الشمالية أكثر من مليار دولار هذا العام. هذا المبلغ لا يشملها كلها، حيث يغطي فقط تلك التي يمكننا تحديدها بدقة.

وهذا يعزز وجهة النظر التي طرحها Kavelj22 بأنها مصدر إيرادات للنظام، بدلاً من كونها هجمات فردية. إن مجموعة Lazarus والهجمات الأخرى التي ناقشناها هي مجرد جزء من نظام بيئي اقتصادي كامل يعتمد على هذا النوع من الهجمات.

https://thecryptobasic.com/2026/10/02/24-hour-crypto-market-update-what-happened-in-crypto-on-october-2-2026/

Same point I was trying to make that even when a gambler that is addicted keeps losing, he cannot just stop gambling, since he doesn’t know his limit, instead he would go as far as borrowing money to keep gambling. The only thing that might stop him is maybe after borrowing from people and he still does not make any profit or win to pay back his debt and has no means of borrowing again, then since there is no option where to get money to gamble he can decide to pause gambling then but does not necessarily mean his stopping gambling.

It's crazy but yes it's true you end up some times not being able to control yourself to be able to know when to stop but this happens mostly with people who are addicted to gambling in this case this person's do not necessarily need to have all the money they need because most times if they really cannot get the money they need to gamble at a time some of them go as far as borrowing to gamble and it's that bad for them so even at the point of borrowing they still do not know when to stop gambling.

A gambler with no source of income will not chase losses because he won't have more money to spend, it isn't easy to lose and let go unless the gambler has the discipline to stop when he is losing. The spirit of gambling is what makes losers to keep looking for a way to win but those who knows the disadvantages of chasing after losses they will stop when they are not winning. The mindset controls what we do if your mindset could not stop you not even the money you lack will stop you until you are not having anything to pay again.

You're correct on this and honestly this idea people have about gamblers is really crazy, some people even go as far as calling all gamblers jobless but then they fail to understand that gambling is a choice and weather you believe in gambling or not it doesn't change what the next person believes or thinks about gambling so for a gambler he doesn't seem to care when he losses but for someone who is not a gambler when he hears about the loses it becomes a big deal and he wonders why he will have to lose such an amount of money to gambling, a gambler knows that in gambling you either win or lose so what ever the outcome is at a point in time at the end of the day it's a win.

When gambling, you have to face both profit and loss. However, those who gamble a lot also face more losses. And in this case, those who are unemployed gamble the most because they do not have any kind of job and do not have a way to earn money, they consider gambling an easy way. At first, when they gamble, if they can make some profit, it influences them a lot. From then on, no matter how much they lose, they continue their efforts. Those who work or do business in this place do not get much time to gamble because they are busy with their profession, so they can gamble less. However, those who have low salaries despite being employed, gamble for extra income. And they face a lot of losses. However, as far as I have seen practically and what has been seen in research, the effect of gambling is more visible among young people and those who are unemployed. And in this case, they face the most losses.

Many always think when gamblers chase after losses it is because they are jobless and have no source of income, but this is not true. Anybody can chase losses, even those who have a source of income. Some gamblers can't just bear the pain of loss, and they haven't understood gambling that it is a game of loss and win. If you don't know this and build your mind well, loss will look like a big thing that you can't easily let go. Chasing losses is not a matter of not having a source of income; it is a mindset, and it can be changed with an understanding of what gambling is all about.

If I'm not mistaken, the site has been down for over two months now, which doesn't seem to have happened before. So yes, you could say they've finally shut down the freebitcoin site, but whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is up for debate. On the one hand, it's good because there won't be any more users getting scammed, even though some people continued to make deposits there despite the growing number of problems surrounding freebitcoin. On the other hand, it's bad because there are still many questions that those who were scammed will likely never get answers to.

@jasyme made a quote about not believing that people actually make gambling a source of income when they don’t have the power to decide the outcome of the game and I then tried explaining that yes there are people who do this and this set of people who take gambling as a source of income are jobless people. Because if you actually have a job which you earn a living from, you won’t make gambling a source of income for you.

Once someone is jobless and addicted, it does not really matter if they are winning or losing, they can’t just stop and they continue putting all they have into gambling, all in the name of looking for more money.

نعم، تدعم الصين كوريا الشمالية اقتصاديًا بشكل عام، ولكن لافتراض أن الحكومة الصينية متواطئة في هذه الحالة هو أمر بعيد بعض الشيء في رأيي. بناءً على الموضوع المرفق، يبدو الأمر أشبه بـ "عصابة صينية تغسل الأموال". حتى أحد المعلقين يفترض تواطؤ الحكومة الصينية (وليس كحقيقة بل كحدس). على الرغم من أن هذا الموضوع مثير للاهتمام، إلا أنني ما زلت أعتقد أنه قفزة (بناءً على المعلومات الحالية) للانتقال من غاسلي الأموال الصينيين إلى تواطؤ الصين المحتمل.

If you read between his replies, the "monthly" was an error. Seems he wanted to say "mostly" but keyboard probably changed it due to autocorrect. He is saying instant swap does not require kyc before you can swap, but if they find your transaction suspicious just like you also said, they may request for kyc before the funds will be unfrozen unlike centralized exchanges that asked for it before you make deposits. This is why he says it's good to read the terms and conditions of such services before you make use of anyone.


I'm not sure why anyone would use an instant swap without doing a test transaction. Ever since I came across a thread where one guy was dragging an instant swap service for his 12 ETH, my trust on those services died immediately. What was even scary about this particular one is that the exchange was a no kyc service but refused to process the output transaction because they suspect the transaction was route through Tornado cash and I'm like 'when did we get here'? Although, they later released the funds after couple of drags but not worth it.

أعتقد أن التمييز هنا مهم. ليس الأمر أن وسط أفريقيا تراجعت لمجرد أنها خرجت بأغلبية الأصوات. بل إنها أيضًا في اتحاد نقدي (CEMAC) مع بنك مركزي إقليمي هددها بفرض عقوبات لأن تشريعاتها الوطنية خالفت الاتحاد النقدي بأكمله. هذا يعني ضغطًا خارجيًا مباشرًا من الدول المجاورة، وليس مجرد اعتراف داخلي بالفشل.

السلفادور ليست في نفس الموقف لأنها مستقلة ماليًا بالفعل (مدولرة). الضغط الوحيد على السلفادور جاء من صندوق النقد الدولي، بدلاً من الدول المجاورة.


برايي الاثنين مو منفصلين، الوضع الاقتصادي المتدهور بالذات هو السبب اللي خلى القرار متسرع وغير مدروس، حكومة ماشية براس المال بشكل طبيعي ماكانت تحتاج تثبت نفسها بخطوة جريئة كذا. يعني الفقر نفسه ولد الحاجة للمقامرة السياسية.


بس لو كان انتصار معنوي حقيقي كان المفروض نشوف دول ثانية تتبعها بنفس الجدية، وحتى الوحيدة اللي جربت (افريقيا الوسطى) تراجعت خلال سنة وحدة. يعني الانجاز الرمزي موجود، بس عمليا ما قنع ولا دولة ثانية تكرر التجربة لحد الان، وهذا يضعف فكرة انه نموذج ناجح يستاهل التقليد.

لا، بل على العكس تمامًا. قامت وزارة العدل الأمريكية بالفعل بتوجيه اتهامات لبعض الأشخاص من لازاروس في وقت مبكر من عام 2018، وثلاثة منهم مدرجون على قائمة مكتب التحقيقات الفيدرالي لأكثر مجرمي الإنترنت المطلوبين.

لذلك لا، فهم لا يختفون ببساطة دون عواقب، بل يختفون مع عواقب، ونحن نعرف من هم. إنهم ببساطة لا يعودون لأنهم موجودون في كوريا الشمالية، التي ليس لديها معاهدة تسليم مجرمين مع الولايات المتحدة. وهذا يجعل الوضع يبدو وكأنه لا توجد عواقب، في حين أن العواقب القانونية موجودة في الواقع، لكنها لا تصل أبدًا إلى الشخص الفعلي.

There are people who actually do, more especially jobless people, so they invest more of their time in gambling. They even go ask far as taking higher stake, just to make sure they make profit when winning isn’t even guaranteed and at this point I’ll say this set of people are addicted to gambling because they can’t actually do without it. They have so much confidence to win a bet, they don’t care about how much they loose because they will keep chasing after their losses.

You're right about device fingerprinting being utilized to identify multi-accounting.
Some casinos also analyze browser fingerprints, device IDs, WebGL fingerprints, time zones, font types, and various other subtle indicators.
Therefore, merely changing the IP address has little effect if the individual is using the same device or browser, particularly Google Chrome.
I suspect that some casinos deliberately allow multi-accounting to continue for a while, waiting for the ideal moment when the individual makes a deposit, plays, and then attempts to withdraw significant winnings (this is just my speculation, though).

If AI does't lie, Freebitco.in is blocked in Australia too, while from posts here we know that they're blocked in Netherlands in Germany. Usually I'm against such blocking, but maybe this time it saved at least several people from falling into this scam.

But in general I don't agree with words ''Lucky are those residing in countries where everything online should be locally regulated.'' Nope, they just force me to change DNS, use VPn and use other things to bypass stupid restrictions.

Not all other regions. Users from Germany don't see the Cloudflare error either.
If you visit the website with a German IP address, you will see a message saying "Sorry, this website has been blocked at request of the German government authorities."

The risk takers will suck not see the need to stop gambling they will rather want to be the person that will chase the %5 win which gives them the room to lose money they will win. The risk to gamble is a personal thing it is not something to convince a player to stop or continue but a player who has lost so much will have a rethink not to depend on gambling as a source of his income. The casino owners will not be chased out of business since they control the game they will remain the winners and the players will be coming because they will keep losing.

All this is understandable, for 20 years or more Ronaldo has been a football legend and young fans no longer remember Portugal without Ronaldo and cannot imagine Portugal after Ronaldo.
However, this is how Brazil fans felt after Pele, Argentina fans after Maradona or Germany fans after Beckenbauer and all these national teams continued to play after the departure of these football legends and won football trophies again, including world championship titles.
I think the bigger problem here is actually the way Ronaldo left, not with dignity like Messi but with a scandal and an affair.
All this has cast a shadow over his brilliant football career.
The fact is that Ronaldo is no longer as fast and effective in attack as he used to be when he was younger, but he could certainly help the younger players as a mentor and role model.
However, it is encouraging to see that this did not affect the Portugal players too much and that they continue to win, even without Ronaldo and that they are still a good bet.

I still don't believe that anyone will try to make gambling his source of income when he doesn't have the power to decide the outcome of any game. The game is a game of luck anyone who gets lucky will use the amount he win for something that is more reliable and dependable not  invest into gambling again when he is not sure of having the same luck that brought the win to him. Those who take gambling as their main source of income will be depending on the the win to earn a living and when they lose that means they have to go hungry, broke and sad until they are lucky to win again that's not the kind of life anyone should wish himself which means gambling is not to be used as a source of income.

It's basically an act that can lead to frustration because the chances of winning is like 5%, and 95% of losing which made it near impossible to make a living from it, that's why the casino owners are getting richer by the day, because if you select like ten games in an accumulated bet, you need to succeed in your 10/10 selection before you can win, while the casino owners is just looking for a single game inside to fail, so the casino will always be on the winning side,  that's why is see it as a self destruct for anyone to see it as a means of income.

بياناتك تؤكد حجتي بالفعل. انخفض استخدام البيتكوين في المعاملات اليومية من 25.7٪ في عام 2021 إلى 8.1٪ في عام 2024. وانخفضت حصة المعاملات المالية التي تتم بالبيتكوين من 4.5٪ إلى أقل من 1٪ خلال نفس الفترة.

بمعنى آخر، بعد 4 سنوات من الضغط التشريعي والدعم المالي، اختار السكان عدم استخدامه على أساس يومي. هذا هو الدليل القاطع على أن القضية لا تتعلق فقط بالمال والبنية التحتية. لم يقتنع غالبية السكان بالفكرة منذ البداية.

أتفق مع هذا الطرح، فقد تم فرض هذا القيد في فبراير 2025 عندما وقعوا على اتفاقية القرض الرئيسية الأصلية. هذا يعني أن أحداث هذا الأسبوع ليست قيداً جديداً، بل مجرد تنازل عن خرق لقيد قائمة عمره ما يقرب من عام ونصف.

ويبلغ احتياطي البلاد الآن 7,792 Bitcoin وفقاً لوثائقهم العامة، وجميعها جاءت عن طريق التبرعات كما يدعون. مما يعني أن الاحتياطي لا يزال ينمو على الرغم من القيد، ولكن تحت غطاء "التبرعات" بدلاً من الشراء المباشر.

People like us who lack the capital don't even think of setting up a mining farm. I personally just prefer leveraging on high volume utility coins and as of recently, my personal favorites are Xrp,Hbar and Arb on a daily trading. I switch in between them because they are far easier to trade on futures and mostly I usually go long on them. I hardly short the market. I somehow find a strong connection to them because I was seriously backtesting and observing them during the heavy downtrend of the market and I noticed how they were bouncing back and surviving the worst market conditions and that gave me the confidence I needed to trade their volatile contracts.

I am confirming the full repayment of the loan, thank you for the full repayment. Now you have no more active non-collateral loan, with me.

---

I am confirming the receipt and the new repayment schedule should be as mentioned below:
25th October 2026: 481$
30th October 2026: 130$ Repayment weekly.

---

I am confirming that I have received it and Now you have 2 active non-collateral loan which repayment schedule should be as mentioned schedule:
2026-10-21: 249$
8th October 2026: 148$

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.

جاءتني هذه الفكرة من الأخ Rikafip عندما وصلني إشعار إشارة (Mention) منه بالأمس، ففكرت أن بياناتنا في القسم المحلي (Local Board) يجب أن نراها أيضاً. في شهر سبتمبر، بلغ إجمالي المشاركات في قسمنا العربي 222 مشاركة.

هذه هي المرة الأولى التي أقوم فيها بجمع وإعداد هذه البيانات، لذا قد تكون هناك بعض الأخطاء. لا تترددوا في تنبيهي وسأحاول تصحيحها في المرات القادمة.

دعونا نتحدث الآن عن أعلى 3 أعضاء من حيث عدد المشاركات؛ أولهم اسمي هههه، والثاني الأخ khaled0111، والثالث الأخ Kavelj22.

• 1. ObeyKnock
• 2. khaled0111
• 3. Kavelj22

دعونا الآن نستعرض الرسوم البيانية التي تغطي جميع أعضاء القسم العربي الذين شاركوا هذا الشهر. إذا كان لديكم أي ملاحظات أو أخطاء، لا تترددوا في ذكرها.

ملاحظة: استعنت بقليل من الذكاء الاصطناعي في إعداد هذه الرسوم البيانية.


كما أنشأت مخططاً دائرياً (Pie Chart) يوضح نسبة مساهمة كل عضو، وإليكم المخطط:


وهذا جدول يوضح أعلى 10 أعضاء نشاطاً هذا الشهر:


هذه محاولة بسيطة مني ومبادرة لتقديم ملخص شهري لمشاركات سبتمبر. تم جمع البيانات من موقع TryNinja الخاص بـ (bitlist.co).

قريباً جداً سأشارككم ملخص نقاط الجدارة (Merits) أيضاً، حيث لا أزال في مرحلة جمع وتحليل البيانات الخاص بها.

أتمنى أن تشاركوني آراءكم وملاحظاتكم، كيف وجدتم هذا الملخص؟