Last update: 2026-01-22_Thu_16.00h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Kavelj22 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Kavelj22
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Kavelj22" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66317139 (unedited backup) (by passwordnow) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 23:50:32 CET 2026) in Sexual abuse on children.:
They have problem mentally and I think it's because of what they see and what they desire. It's also possible that they have been deprived for a long time and so, that's what they think is right which is morally very wrong.
I don't think it's normal, or that it should be normal.
It's never normal but the news that we hear about this kind of case becomes normal. These predators need to be charged so badly that they have to be punished to realize what they did is wrong in an absolute level.
2. Post 66315507 (unedited backup) (by kingbj21) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 16:13:49 CET 2026) in Flag Support Request - nutildah Trust Abuse:
TO THE COORDINATED CASINO DEFENSE SQUAD:
Interesting how SEVEN casino shills appeared to defend nutildah without addressing a SINGLE mathematical fact.
Let me address each statistical illiterate individually:
YAHOO62278: "Multiple users tagged you"
RESPONSE:
Yes, multiple casino campaign participants coordinated retaliatory tags after I exposed Casino's fraud.
Notice what you DIDN'T address:
- Is 93.54σ deviation possible in fair play? (Answer: No)
- Is 71% BTTC RTP acceptable? (Answer: No)
- Did nutildah use ChatGPT? (Answer: Yes - "Markov chains" proves it)
Your casino campaigns: (List them if known)
QUESTION: How much does Casinos pay you to defend fraud?
VOD: "You have -9 from default trust"
RESPONSE:
Yes, from coordinated casino shills retaliating for exposing fraud.
Mathematical fact doesn't care about trust scores:
- 93.54 standard deviations = impossible by chance
- Probability < 10^(-1000)
- 0/10,000 Monte Carlo simulations matched
CHALLENGE: Calculate the probability of 89% win rate over 13,998 blackjack hands.
Can't? Then your opinion on my trust score is irrelevant.
QUESTION: Do you participate in casino signature campaigns? Disclose your conflicts.
KAVELJ22: "Not a single piece of evidence"
RESPONSE:
Are you blind or lying?
EVIDENCE PROVIDED:
✓ 13,998 documented transactions
✓ Complete statistical analysis
✓ Monte Carlo simulation (code available)
✓ Z-score: 93.54σ
✓ Chi-square: 8,748.98
✓ Binomial p-value: < 10^(-1000)
✓ Currency discrimination data
✓ RTP by currency: BFG 99%, USDT 94%, BTTC 71%
YOUR EVIDENCE:
✗ Zero calculations
✗ Zero refutation
✗ Just "bullshit" repeated 3 times
QUESTION: Can you calculate a Z-score? Clearly not.
Your casino campaigns: (Probably multiple)
FREE MARKET CAPITALIST: "55% AI according to gptzero"
RESPONSE:
HILARIOUS considering:
1. nutildah's response was 100% ChatGPT
• Claimed "Markov chains" (wrong - blackjack hands independent)
• Zero calculations provided
• Pure buzzword soup
2. I provided actual mathematical analysis
• Calculations with real numbers
• Python simulation code
• Verifiable statistical tests
3. AI detectors are unreliable
• False positives common
• 55% = inconclusive
• Doesn't invalidate mathematics
CHALLENGE: Explain what a Markov chain is and why nutildah's claim was wrong.
Can't? Then shut up about AI.
QUESTION: What casino campaigns do you run? Disclose.
JEROMETASH: "Mentally retarded"
RESPONSE:
Ad hominem = admission you have no mathematical argument.
I'm "retarded" but I can:
✓ Calculate Z-scores (93.54σ)
✓ Run Monte Carlo simulations (0/10,000)
✓ Apply binomial probability (p < 10^-1000)
✓ Identify ChatGPT fraud ("Markov chains")
You're "smart" but you can't:
✗ Refute a single calculation
✗ Answer basic statistical questions
✗ Understand independent events
✗ Think beyond casino talking points
QUESTION: Which casinos pay you? Full disclosure.
ZOOMIC: "Your 10 -ve tags made me not read"
RESPONSE:
Translation: "I'm too lazy to evaluate evidence."
The mathematics don't care about your reading habits:
- 93.54σ = impossible
- 71% BTTC RTP = fraud
- Monte Carlo = validates impossibility
QUESTION: If you didn't read the evidence, why comment?
Oh right - casino campaigns require defending fraud.
MAJESTIC-MILF: "Crooked thoughts... bleed casinos with lies"
RESPONSE:
Which part is "lies"?
- 13,998 documented bets? (Verifiable)
- 93.54σ calculation? (Mathematical fact)
- 71% BTTC RTP? (Observable data)
- nutildah's "Markov chains" error? (Proven ChatGPT fraud)
CHALLENGE: Point to ONE "lie" and prove it's false with mathematics.
You can't. Because mathematics aren't lies.
QUESTION: How many casino campaigns have you participated in?
THE PATTERN IS OBVIOUS:
SEVEN casino shills appeared within hours to:
✗ Attack me personally
✗ Ignore mathematical evidence
✗ Defend proven fraud
✗ Coordinate negative tags
✗ Provide ZERO calculations
✗ Refuse to disclose conflicts
NOT ONE addressed:
- Is 93.54σ possible in fair play?
- Is 71% BTTC RTP acceptable?
- Why did nutildah claim "Markov chains"?
- Can any of you calculate a Z-score?
TO THE HONEST COMMUNITY:
Watch this pattern:
When casino fraud is exposed with mathematics:
1. Casino campaign participants coordinate attack
2. File retaliatory negative trust
3. Use ad hominem (retard, idiot, blackmailer)
4. Ignore all mathematical evidence
5. Never provide calculations
6. Protect advertiser revenue over users
This proves:
✓ Forum prioritizes casino revenue
✓ Trust system weaponized against victims
✓ Statistical evidence systematically ignored
✓ Casino shills coordinate defenses
✓ No honest evaluation of evidence
SEVEN "different" users, ZERO mathematical rebuttals.
THE CHALLENGE (REISSUED):
To ANY of the seven casino shills above:
Answer with MATHEMATICS:
1. Calculate probability of 89% win rate over 13,998 hands (p=0.495)
2. Calculate 95% confidence interval for n=6,678, RTP=99%
3. Determine if 94% RTP falls within that interval
4. Explain what a Markov chain is
5. Explain why blackjack hands are NOT Markovian
6. Calculate Z-score for 12,462 wins out of 13,998 trials
Rules:
- Show your work
- Provide equations
- Use actual numbers
- No ChatGPT
- No ad hominem
If you cannot answer (and you cannot):
Then admit you're statistically illiterate casino shills protecting fraud for money.
DISCLOSURE DEMANDED:
Each of you must disclose:
1. Current casino signature campaigns
2. Past casino affiliations (last 2 years)
3. Referral relationships with casinos
4. Any compensation from gambling operations
5. Financial ties to BetFury specifically
Failure to disclose = admission of conflict of interest
FINAL STATEMENT:
SEVEN casino shills cannot refute basic mathematics.
93.54 standard deviations.
71% BTTC RTP.
0/10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.
13,998 documented transactions.
These are facts, not opinions.
Your coordinated attack proves:
✓ You prioritize casino money over truth
✓ You cannot engage with evidence
✓ You weaponize trust against victims
✓ You protect fraud for profit
The mathematics don't lie.
Seven casino shills do.
Respond with EQUATIONS or admit you're paid defenders of fraud.
P.S. TO MODERATORS:
Notice how users appeared to defend nutildah?
This coordinated attack against legitimate mathematical evidence proves:
- Forum protects advertiser revenue
- Casino campaigns coordinate defenses
- Trust system weaponized
- Statistical evidence systematically suppressed
If you delete this while keeping their coordinated attack, you prove complicity.
3. Post 66314311 (unedited backup) (by JeromeTash) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 09:11:07 CET 2026) in Flag Support Request - nutildah Trust Abuse:
Another useless kingbj21 thread that is most likely going to be deleted in the near future by the poster himself, just like he did in the past. I think members are right when they say that you are mentally retarded.
Waaw! How much time it took you to write all this bullshit? You have not provided a single piece of evidence for any of these claims.
Not much when he decided to use ChatGPT and just copy and paste.
You have 9 trusted negative feedbacks and 4 untrusted negative feedbacks, why you choose only Nutildah to attack him with your bullshit accusations?
I guess he is trying to retaliate for this -
Flag for kingbj21
4. Post 66314253 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 08:41:49 CET 2026) in Flag Support Request - nutildah Trust Abuse:
Waaw! How much time it took you to write all this bullshit?
Not that much. I've run the text through gptzero AI detector and it gives a mixed result 55% AI.
I feel like adding another tag to his profile, but I don't think it would add anything, and he's already making a fool of himself with this thread.
5. Post 66314036 (unedited backup) (by OmegaStarScream) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 06:19:55 CET 2026) in منصات المغرب العربي:
الامارات في المركز الاول حسب قيمة الاموال المتدفقة و ليس حسب عدد المستخدمين. كما ذكر خالد فان هذا راجع اساسا الى توفير البنية التحتية التكنولوجية القادرة على استيعاب هذه التدفقات بالتضافة الى صياغة التشريعات و القوانين بما يتناسب مع البنية الجديدة. للأسف فان الامارات لزحدها ليست مؤشرا عاما على التطور في المنطقة العربية بالنظر الى حجم التباين بينها و بين الدول في المراتب التي تليها بالمقارنة مع عدد السكان. يعني مصر او المغرب او السعودية يظهر ان لديها نسبة تدفقات تقترب من الامارات لكن لا ننسى عامل حجم التعداد السكاني و الفارق بين اي من تلك الدول مع الامارات.
هذا المقال من موقع اماراتي تقول ان 30% من سكان الامارات يستخدمون العملات المشفرة اي حوالي 3 مليون مستخدم من جملة 11 مليون العدد الجملي للسكان. لك ان تتخيل نفس النسبة في مصر التي يتجاوز عدد سكانها ال100 مليون بكثير.
https://www.emaratalyoum.com/business/local/2025-12-09-1.1995469بالحديث عن الامارات، هل تملك فكرة (أو أحد من الاخوة هنا) عن طريقة الشراء عن طريق البيتكوين أو العملات المشفرة بصفة عامة؟
يعني في حال أردت شراء عقار أو سيارة غالية مثلا، كيف تكون الدفع في هذه الحالة؟ هل يكون الدفع عن طريق Binance Pay للتأكد من أن الأموال "نقية" و أن source of funds موجود لأن بينانس في هذه الحالة هي من سوف تتكفل بهذه التفاصيل؟ و أنه سوف يطلب منك جميع هذه الأمور، و يمكنك الدفع عن طريق محفظة شخصية مثل الكتروم مثلا.
أنا أفترض أن ان كانت قيمة الأموال المتفدقة كبيرة لهذه الدرجة، فان عمليات الكريبتو قد تكون تكون سهلة جدا، ربما أكثر من اللازم لكن في نفس الوقت، لا أرى كيف للامارات أن لا تضيف أنظمة لمنع غسيل الأموال.
سبب ذكري لبينانس هو ان لم تخني الذاكرة، يوجد شركة تقوم بانشاء أجهزة الدفع الاكتروني كانت قد قامت باضافة بينانس يعني أي شركة لها القدرة في استقبال الأموال في حساب بينانس بكل سهولة، لكن لست أدري ما اذا كانت الشركات ملزمة باستخدام هذه الأجهوة (قانونيا) أم لا.
6. Post 66313961 (unedited backup) (by PostQuantumBTC) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 05:12:14 CET 2026) in Donald Trump says 8 European countries will face tax over Greenland:
China and Russia are already there in the ocean arround trying to exploit from Arctic resources, and the USA needs to confirm its long term existing because it can't compete with Russian-Chineese powers in the oceans.
Do not believe what Trump is saying, they are not true. From what that was found out, there is no Russia and China presence in Greenland.
What Trump wants is territory, minerals...
Trump only wants to expand US territory to Greenland because of the gradual melting of the ice in the region, Trump want to make the place to generate income for US. They may be suspecting that rare earth minerals are there, what China used to end Trump bullying trade war on China because US does not really have rare earth.
I doubt Trump will continue the conflict against Europe his allies in NATO because of rare minerals while he can get them in easier way. A politician in Greenland said yesterday that USA already exist in the island but Trump is looking for another kind of presence. He wants minerals of course but not only this the reason as the move has more goals beyond what the media shows us everyday. He want Russia and China and their allies to know that USA exists in this part of the world. After annexing Greenland, those countries will no longer has the same privileges as before.
To be more precise, it was the US that wanted Greenland, not Trump. Because the idea of acquiring this island dates back to the 19th century and has been repeatedly discussed over the past several decade. But so far they have not succeeded in winning Greenland
What the US wants is not just resources, they see Greenland as a strategic element to consolidate and expand their influence, from economic to military. And the geopolitical situation is becoming increasingly tense due to intense competition from Russia and China. I think this time the US will do everything it can to take Greenland
You are right, they want Greenland to become more competitive and restrain Russia and China. There is no reason to create military conflict with their allies.
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/07/politics/us-greenland-trump-denmark-history-hnkIt.can be easily known that you and Kavelj22 are Trump supporters from the United States, and you will both be among the 14% that voted in the United States to support what Trump is doing against Greenland. Just know that you are all bullies. Listen to what you are saying, that Trump will do everything it takes to take over Greenland. That means even if it is about war.
You want to take over your allied country just because of your own selfish interests, bit you against China to take over Taiwan. All you big countries are bullies but United States is the worst of them in disguise. China and Russia were big countries in the past but United States took over lands.
EU really need to sit right because United States can be the problem in the future just like I have said before, if the power is becoming too big, anything can happen in the future.
You have base in Greenland, you said that is not enough, you are allowed to mine in Greenland and you said that is not also still enough. If you want to expand your military in the country without threats, Denmark would have allowed you, but you said that is kit enough. What you need is the whole Greenland.
What was Russia think when it sold Alaska to United, if not because of financial strain from war and because of the Britain that was thinking of planing to seized the area. EU played a large part in what United States becomes today but United States wants to tend against them.
It is better you know that you may think you are the world power, know that Russia has weapon like you, China has economy like you, what makes you have the power is your influence. EU supporting you is the main influence that you have. Know that works power can shift with this bullying.
7. Post 66313940 (unedited backup) (by Smack That Ace) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 04:52:44 CET 2026) in Donald Trump says 8 European countries will face tax over Greenland:
China and Russia are already there in the ocean arround trying to exploit from Arctic resources, and the USA needs to confirm its long term existing because it can't compete with Russian-Chineese powers in the oceans.
Do not believe what Trump is saying, they are not true. From what that was found out, there is no Russia and China presence in Greenland.
What Trump wants is territory, minerals...
Trump only wants to expand US territory to Greenland because of the gradual melting of the ice in the region, Trump want to make the place to generate income for US. They may be suspecting that rare earth minerals are there, what China used to end Trump bullying trade war on China because US does not really have rare earth.
I doubt Trump will continue the conflict against Europe his allies in NATO because of rare minerals while he can get them in easier way. A politician in Greenland said yesterday that USA already exist in the island but Trump is looking for another kind of presence. He wants minerals of course but not only this the reason as the move has more goals beyond what the media shows us everyday. He want Russia and China and their allies to know that USA exists in this part of the world. After annexing Greenland, those countries will no longer has the same privileges as before.
To be more precise, it was the US that wanted Greenland, not Trump. Because the idea of acquiring this island dates back to the 19th century and has been repeatedly discussed over the past several decade. But so far they have not succeeded in winning Greenland
What the US wants is not just resources, they see Greenland as a strategic element to consolidate and expand their influence, from economic to military. And the geopolitical situation is becoming increasingly tense due to intense competition from Russia and China. I think this time the US will do everything it can to take Greenland
You are right, they want Greenland to become more competitive and restrain Russia and China. There is no reason to create military conflict with their allies.
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/07/politics/us-greenland-trump-denmark-history-hnk
8. Post 66313938 (unedited backup) (by Vod) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 04:51:08 CET 2026) in Flag Support Request - nutildah Trust Abuse:
You have 9 trusted negative feedbacks and 4 untrusted negative feedbacks
If I may remind the honourable Kavelj22, untrusted feedback is
irrelevant.
9. Post 66313512 (unedited backup) (by PostQuantumBTC) (scraped on Mon Jan 19 23:47:43 CET 2026) in Donald Trump says 8 European countries will face tax over Greenland:
China and Russia are already there in the ocean arround trying to exploit from Arctic resources, and the USA needs to confirm its long term existing because it can't compete with Russian-Chineese powers in the oceans.
Do not believe what Trump is saying, they are not true. From what that was found out, there is no Russia and China presence in Greenland.
What Trump wants is territory, minerals...
Trump only wants to expand US territory to Greenland because of the gradual melting of the ice in the region, Trump want to make the place to generate income for US. They may be suspecting that rare earth minerals are there, what China used to end Trump bullying trade war on China because US does not really have rare earth.
Are you not surprised that Trump did not attend Conference of the Parties (COP) last year?
10. Post 66311852 (unedited backup) (by Solodoski) (scraped on Mon Jan 19 15:58:44 CET 2026) in Donald Trump says 8 European countries will face tax over Greenland:
I see this the most strange situation that a country want to force another country to sell itself. And that country can't resist the USA pressures despite supported from almost all countries as I didn't hear anybody supporting Trump invasion plan.
This not a good move by president Donald Trump to acquire Greenland, and I think it will not be good for the world at large. Russia is already speaking up about this situation and we know that Russia and the US are not best of friends, so this might result to a big issue if Trump continues to put pressure. I really don't even understand why Trump will want to make such move, but the annoying thing is that Greenland can't even stand up for themselves and I don't think Denmark can withstand the might of the US. I just hope this does not lead to WW3.
11. Post 66310091 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Mon Jan 19 03:31:38 CET 2026) in ميتاماسك تضيف دعم بيتكوين الأصلي:
ايضا لقد قام بإضافة شبكة Tron منذ يومين أعتقد.
هذه الإضافات متأخرة بعض الشيء عن منافسيها أيضا فل ال swaps فهي تأخذ 0.875% و فاإدة
وtrustwallet تقوم بها مجاني و مع ذلك مازلت تدعم أكثر سبكات من metamask لذلك من الأفضل إبقاء استعمال عال trustwalletلأنها لازالت خيار الأفضل و تقوم بنفس ما تفعله المحفضة الاخرى و زيادة Trust-wallet مازلت مفضلة عليها لكثير
انت حر في استخدام الشبكة التي تتناسب مع احتياجاتك و لكن يجب ان تعي انك تتحدث عن شيئين مختلفين تماما لان محفظة ميتاماسك تدعك اللامركزية و الخصوصية على البلوكشين و ربما بسبب هذا تأخر دعم المزيد من الشبكات بسبب تأخر عمليات التطوير. اما محفة TrustWallet فانها محفظة مركزية تتحكم بها شركة خاصة التي هي شركة بينانس. اذا قمت بالاستخدام الصحيح امحفظة ميتاماسك فانت حتما بأمان و لكن على محفظة Trustwallet فانت لا يمكن ان تتوقع عدم حصول اخطاء ممكن ان تؤدي الى ثغرات يستطيع مخترق استغلالها و هو فعلا ما حدث مؤخرا حين تعرض مستخدمو اصافة المتصفح على كروم الى خسائر بلغت ملايين الدولارات و قد كنا تناولنا الخبر بالنقاش هنا:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5567540.msg66238198#msg66238198من أجل الدقة أخي فإن محفظة تراست هي محفظة لامركزية وغير وصائية وحتى أن برنامجها مفتوح المصدر حيث أن الكود الأساسي (Wallet Core) مفتوح المصدر وموجود على GitHub ويمكن لأي شخص الوصول إلى الكود وفحصه أو حتى تطويره لكن الفرق أن التطبيق على اندرويد أو الإضافة على كروم التي تدير برنامج المحفظة الأساسي ليس مفتوحة بالكامل (يعني هناك أجزاء مفتوحة وأخرى مغلقة) ويتم إدارتها بواسطة بينانس وهذا الأمر الذي يثير بعض القلق لدى البعض
يعني المحفظة لامركزية وغير وصائية ومفتوحة المصدر لكنها تدار بواسطة شركة بينانس على عكس المحافظ اللامركزية بالكامل التي تدار بواسطة المجتمع ورغم أنها آمنة مثلها مثل أي محفظة لامركزية أخرى لكن امتلاكها بواسطة بينانس هو ما يثير تخوف البعض
12. Post 66306712 (unedited backup) (by yhiaali3) (scraped on Sun Jan 18 03:21:26 CET 2026) in أول اختراق كريبتو في عام 2026:
هذه الحادثة دفعتني للتساؤل حول ما اذا كانت هذه المنصات مرخصة ام لا. و اذا كانت تملك ترخيصا، أليس من المفترض انها تغطي نفقات تأمين الاصول لدى احدى شركات التأمين او برصد غطاء نقدي محدد كضمان في حال حصول شيء مشابه؟ و اذا كانت تعمل بدون ترخيص نشاط فانه لا خوف على المالكين من شيء بما ان المستخدمين يتحملون نسبة من المخاطرة بايداع اموالهم في منصات غير مرخصة.
ما أعلمه أخي أن وجود تأمين رسمي لدى شركة تأمين ليس شرطًا عالميًا أو إلزاميًا في كل دولة للحصول على رخصة لأنه كما تعلم أغلب المنصات العالمية مثل بينانس توفر صناديق حماية داخلية (Insurance Fund) لتعويض المستخدمين عند الاختراق أو الخسائر غير المتوقعة من أجل الحفاظ على سمعتها في حال حصول أي ضرر. وبالطبع ممكن أن بعض المنصات قد تبرم عقودًا مع شركات تأمين خاصة لتغطية أصولها الرقمية أو جزء منها.
هيئة الرقابة والتنظيم لا تدقق هل الشركات فيها تأمين أم لا لكنها تدقق في أن المنصة تملك أصول تغطي أصول المستثمرين بالفعل أو بالنسبة للعملات المستقرة المدعومة بالدولار هل تملك احتياط نقدي من الدولار يغطي أصولها الرقمية وهكذا.
13. Post 66297522 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Jan 15 17:01:08 CET 2026) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
Its time for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, and a little bit earlier than last time as I plan to publish the yearly overview by the end of the month. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr
Merit Dashboard and BitList.
Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards, but I still hope that's something that will change in the (near) future.
Post activity per local board during December 2025During the last month, 13997 posts were written across the local boards, which is a slight increase compared to November's number (13826). Increase may seem small, but what's more important is that the negative trend of decreased activity was stopped.
Once again Nigerian board has been far ahead the others, with Russian board at the 2nd, while Turkish board came dangerously close to them and considering how things are developing, I wouldn't be surprised if they take over that 2nd spot. Regarding the left part of the chart, no changes or surprises there, except maybe French local that slowly and steady keeps going down.
Active members per local board during December 2025During December, 1441 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards, which is almost as same as the month before (1445 during November).
Nigerian is at the top, but not as dominant as with the number of posts, Russian board at the 2nd spot while Indonesian at 3rd is far behind them.
Local board members per amount of posts during December 2025When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Romanian is the leader with 57%, while at the same bracket Pilipinas had only 15% of such members.
In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French local board with 55%, while at the same time Portuguese loca had only 20% of those members.
And regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Turkish local board with 57% of such members, while French and Polish local boards didn't have a single member whoe wrote 10+ posts.
Merit shared per local board during December 2025During the above mentioned period, 7657 merit was shared across local boards, which is a slight increase compared to November's 7414 merit. Imho, I think that this is generally a good number considering the overall number of posts written on local boards.
Nigerian board remained at the top, which makes sense considering their number of posts, followed far behind by Russian and Turkish local boards. Its also worth mentioning Greek local board as well, sicne I don't remember the last time they had such a high number of merit sent.
Merit/Post ratio per local board during December 2025During December, the average merit per post ratio across local boards that are part of this overview was 0.55, which is a small increase compared to November's 0.54.
Romanian board is back at the top with 1.88 merit per post, followed by Spanish, Greek, Italian and Croatian board that all had over 1 merit per post ratio, which is something we didn't see for quite some time. Regarding the last month's top board (German), they dropped hard, from 1.66 in Novermber to 0.59 in December, which is not so usual for such a big board.
Merit senders and receivers per local board during December 2025During December, 527 members sent while 628 members received merit which is similar to previous month numbers (536/610). As expected, Nigerian is far ahead the other boards with a huge amount of merit senders and receivers, even considering their number of merit sent.
Merit per transaction across local boards during December 2025Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards. This time Greek local board is at the top with 7+ merit sent per tx, which is only possible to happen on the smaller boards that don't have big number of merit transactions.
The most active members per local board during December 2025And for the end of December's local board overview, the list of the most active local board members. klarki from Russian local board was the most active member with 145 posts, at the 2nd place is mandown from Turkish local board who wrote 137 posts while another member from Russian local, Julien_Olynpic is at the 3rd place with 110 posts written. Gj guys, keep it up!
