You could have seen this coming from a mile away!

Nobody in their right mind would deal with a Newbie and trust him with money. Even worse if it's a Newbie who apparently can't even afford $120!

It would be better not to give loans to Newbies.

It's pointless: the transaction happened on Binance, so there is no on-chain link. It happened shortly after Charles-Tim tagged gordonics.com (with a useless Reference link). Make of that what you want.

Vidim da je Paycek i dalje aktivan, i da se u Konzumu (i drugdje) i dalje koristi za kripto plaćanja iako je naravno upitno koliko kupaca zaista koristi to koristi i za svakodnevnu kupovinu u Konzumu troše svoje kriptovalute.
Bilo bi zanimljivo imati konkretne podatke (postotak kripto plaćanja u odnosu na sva plaćanja na prodajnom mjestu) i koliko je to zaista zaživjelo ali to vjerojatno nećemo nikada saznati.
Mislim da većina ljudi ipak radije čuva svoj btc i ne troši ga ili trguje s njim i da ovakvi promotivni potezi poput uvođenja kripto plaćanja u trgovine nema neki veliki efekt ili značenje na prihvaćanje kriptovaluta za plaćanje u svakodnevnom životu.

As I said, I don't expect this issue to be resolved they're likely just targeting more victims and they will come here with new service again.

Ja mislim da smo blizu zasicenja, entuzijazma koji je pratio spomen kriota kao da je nestalo (doduse mozda je to znak nadolazeceg bear marketa), a na sam spomen kriptovaluta kod vecine osoba je prve asocijacije su spekulacija i prevare.

Ne znam kakva je situacija sa biznisima koji primaju direktno kripto, prije nekoliko godina ih je bilo nekoliko, ai mi se cini ovako na prvu loptu bez detaljmog istrazivanja da broj biznisa koji primaju kripto (govorim direktno kripto, bez konverzije u fiat) nije rastao.

Bojim se da bi se sa strozim regulacijama stvar mogla samo pogorsati.


Da, te institucije koriste kripto za spekulacije a kako su i pojedinacno najveci posjednici kripta koriste svoju poziciju kako bi manipulirali cijenom te tako ostvarivali dobit.

A sto se tice gotovih projekata osim BTC i ETH ,- mozda TON? Ja sam ga koristio dosta i jako je brz i pouzdan, barem do sada.
A od ostalih projekata mozda "oldtimeri" kao LTC, MXR i slicni. Njih ne koristim ali cinjenica da postoje nakon toliko godina govori sama za sebe

I understand what you are all talking about when you say that the APR is tempting, however, the wagering requirement is what alters the situation. There is nothing exactly low-risk about locking coins 1 year with a x12 bet, particularly in case the crypto market will fall within that year. To amateur players or those who hold a smaller holding, it may not be of much sense. However, with a balance large enough and already being active on the platform, it might be worth considering it as a component of the strategy of regular users. As an individual, I would consider the gains as compared to the market risk and the gambling regulations to be in committing to the bet.

That's quite that much but those who's got enough and even more might just think of this a piece of cake.
While the risk is there, paper loss in value and as well as the wagering, yeah it's not that attractive at all.
But those regular players that are in the same position, this might be an incentive for them to fulfill.

 Skjadoon I don't know if it's just me, but you seem to trust this shady exchanges with lots of money. Why is that so?  So far you have about 3 different accusations, and I am not sure if any has been resolved, yet you continue to trust those shady services

---

He has been shilling the service as well, I will also add a tag

The answer is simple  they’re just looking for more victims before pulling an exit scam and disappearing. They’re Russian scammers.

Indeed, through the forum brand names are built. It's not just about the traffic but getting customers sticking through trust and credibility built here.

Enzo Maresca is said to be ready to take over Amorin's job.

As among Manchester United bettors, there are many disappointments, last time in the parlay bet only Man United could not win, the others were correct bets.

For the time being, avoid betting on this team... when it stabilizes, I will return to choose this team as a bet.

Yeah, that's a hard source to find, but how about the last link I provided with the ICO and IDO for ongoing and upcoming presales?
At least you could still buy them at early stages before they were going to be listed on big exchanges? Presales should start with a low price.

I guess the casino should be worried about phishing scams, because if any gamblers land on a phishing site and deposit there, that money was supposed to be going to the original site, but it ended up in the hands of the scammers. 

So if the gambling sites can take preventive measures and remind gamblers and also give awareness about the phishing scam and how to avoid it, from time to time in the form of notices or emails, that will be beneficial for the gamblers as well as the casinos.

I bet he got sacked for his last comments on being " a manager and not a coach" he was already frustrated with the job cause nothing was actually working. One thing is certain; Manchester United brass were very patient with him despite the bad results from last season but it doesn't make sense to get rid of something without replacing it immediately.

Yesterday was Enzo Mascara, today is Amorim, tomorrow is who? My money on Slot 


Yes, possible. The teams ahead of us are also as shit as we're and then there's possibilities of PL getting CL 5 slots for next season again.

Casinos should emphasize that, because with so many domains in circulation, it will create doubts for users as well. Another problem is that when a user uses a fraudulent link on behalf of a casino, the user will question the casino and may later accuse the casino of being a fraudulent casino.

There must be certainty because this is also related to reputation. Apart from that, many users are also careless in using the site, maybe for us who are careful we will find out more about whether the site used is true or not, but those who are careless will use it without thinking about it.

I noticed the Mascara comments you posted on a regular basis but I have taken anti-infection measures. I noticed others starting to call him Mascara too but thankfully I decided to keep his name as his parents intended: Maresca not Mascara 

When they appointed Amorim, I thought he would be a success there but he simply could not come to terms with exactly how big the job was. He was under too much pressure and he could not handle it. Now within the space of days, both Maresca and Amorim have left their respected clubs.

There's truly a possibility that the customer support could be in the dark on this, as you hinted, but even if they know, they can't be running their mouths anyhow, because they do not know who is who. And as for different mirror websites being used for different purpose, that's equally correct, but the person who asked didn't ask for their marketing mirror website or the website that offers different services, but for the one that does the same thing the main/registered website does. For this, they needed to be diplomatic and smart in their responses.

 

Teško je to reći.
Činjenica je da mladi nemaju strpljenja za detaljne analize, čitanja i proučavanja materije.
Long term strateški plan za ulaganje u kripto? No way.
Što se tiče pojedinaca, očito je da starija generacija ima bolje shvaćanje kripta, i strpljenje da sve shvati, uloži i čeka na dobitak.
Međutim, kripto su praktički preuzeli institucionalni ulagači a ono što rade mali ulagači više praktički ne igra nikakvu ulogu na cijenu kripta kao što je to bilo nekada.

Yes, 12x is too much if you are already locking your money for 365 days. Most people will lose everything before the wagering requirement is done and so you gave the casino a free loan for 1 year and then gave up on the money because the house odds often make it very difficulty to take the money out before you bet this much

They should make two different things, one for people that want to invest and help the casino for an annual amount and take the money risk free and other for people that want to gamble and don't mind the big wagering

They should lower to maybe 5x because 12x is very hard to hit

i think you can still earn multiple times from a single link click. but that will depend on the cookies settings that the instant exchange uses (if they use cookies to track referrals).

you can send USDT on eth now for less than $0.01, so it's not really as inconvenient as it was in the past few years, $1 worth of eth can last you a while now.

Resending my previous response here to ensure the posts are not deleted.

Thank you for your question! I’d like to clarify a few points to avoid any misunderstanding.
According to our Terms of Use, we reserve the right to request KYC if a transaction is flagged as higher risk under AML procedures. This is standard practice for exchange services: we do not require KYC automatically for every client, only in cases where internal checks indicate elevated risk.
In such cases, we always give the client a lawful choice: either proceed with the exchange under adjusted conditions and additional fees, or cancel the transaction and receive a refund. The user always retains control of their funds, which are never held without consent.
Regarding BTC → BTC transactions: this is simply a standard exchange operation, not a mixer. The main function of a mixer is to intentionally blend funds from multiple users and obscure their origin. In our service, every transaction is fully transparent, traceable, and under the client’s control. If you want, feel free to Google what a crypto mixer is — you’ll see that what we do does not qualify as mixing in any way.
In short, our service operates strictly within AML rules and exchange standards, with full transparency and user control. BTC → BTC is just one of the standard exchange options, nothing more.


Replying to your post below.

1. Access to funds / KYC & AML
As stated in our Terms of Use, we reserve the right to request KYC only for transactions flagged as higher risk under AML procedures. This does not mean automatic freezing of funds. Users always retain full control over their funds.
If a transaction is not flagged as risky, funds are fully available, and the user manages them directly.
If a transaction is flagged, the user is given a lawful choice: complete KYC and proceed with the exchange under adjusted conditions and possible additional fees, or cancel the transaction and receive a full refund.
Thus, funds are never held arbitrarily; the rules describe options in case of increased risk, while the user always maintains control and the ability to retrieve their assets.

2. Third-party / partner involvement
Even if a transaction is processed by a partner or third party, this does not change the user’s control over their funds. Any technical delays or handling by a third party are simply an operational aspect of the service. In our case, we work with centralized and regulated exchanges such as MEX, Bitget, OKX, and others, ensuring reliability and transparency in fund processing.
User funds remain fully accessible, and any risk is limited to the standard scenario of a flagged transaction, where the user has the choice to proceed with the exchange or receive a refund. Partner involvement does not make the service a mixer or an unsafe platform.

3. BTC → BTC and the distinction from a mixer
BTC → BTC is simply a standard exchange operation, not a mixer. As you cited, a crypto mixer is defined as a service that intentionally obscures the origin of funds, mixes multiple users’ deposits, and may even misuse funds.
In our service:
Funds are never mixed or anonymized.
Every transaction is fully traceable and under the client’s control.
BTC → BTC merely exchanges one type of asset for the same type; it does not obscure or alter the source of funds in a way that makes the service a mixer.
According to your definition:
Our service does not advertise anonymity or privacy-enhancing features,
It does not misappropriate user funds,
KYC is requested only selectively, for flagged transactions, not from all users.

Thus, our service is a standard exchange service, not a mixer, similar to other regulated exchanges and non-custodial wallets. BTC → BTC is simply one of the standard exchange options, nothing more.
We hope this fully clarifies all points: users retain control over their funds, the service operates fully in compliance with AML, and BTC → BTC cannot be considered a mixer under any standard definition.

Thank you for your question! I’d like to clarify a few points to avoid any misunderstanding.
According to our Terms of Use, we reserve the right to request KYC if a transaction is flagged as higher risk under AML procedures. This is standard practice for exchange services: we do not require KYC automatically for every client, only in cases where internal checks indicate elevated risk.
In such cases, we always give the client a lawful choice: either proceed with the exchange under adjusted conditions and additional fees, or cancel the transaction and receive a refund. The user always retains control of their funds, which are never held without consent.
Regarding BTC → BTC transactions: this is simply a standard exchange operation, not a mixer. The main function of a mixer is to intentionally blend funds from multiple users and obscure their origin. In our service, every transaction is fully transparent, traceable, and under the client’s control. If you want, feel free to Google what a crypto mixer is — you’ll see that what we do does not qualify as mixing in any way.
In short, our service operates strictly within AML rules and exchange standards, with full transparency and user control. BTC → BTC is just one of the standard exchange options, nothing more.

Currently, about 90% of transactions go through our systems and only 10% through third parties. We try to exchange Bitcoin, Monero, Ethereum, and other major cryptocurrencies ourselves, but when it comes to USDT/USDC, we usually leave it to our partners. Of course, we are not always able to exchange Bitcoin or other majon crypto ourselves especially if there is a large number of transactions in the same time, but we usually do.

In the future, we plan to expand our infrastructure further. As I mentioned earlier, we were not ready for such a high level of interest in our project and the number of exchanges, which is why sometimes there are delays, as mentioned in a few threads above 

There's some risk, but we try to offset it. For instance if you search for 1 BTC to XMR then we don't count that search in the stats.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13831 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 10098 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4452 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2417 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2465 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9037 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5960 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 1628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +38 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1725 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6138 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2347 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1894 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 1852 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1422 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2202 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 12688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5970 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6531 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3286 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 9369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +141 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4132 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 11280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 525 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2374 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +33 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (25) 6205 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2935 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 8957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1332 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3780 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1003 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1466 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3581 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1247 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +13 / =6 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1078 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 6505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +101 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4074 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1820 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 5125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 4302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14955 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2148 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1168 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1989 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9041 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2400 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3142 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7206 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11233 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1363 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3688 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 19586 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2440 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5221 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1489 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +43 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (10) 3293 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1879 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1070 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 815 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1103 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 7507 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1766 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9179 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 642 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6643 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8182 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 203: HostFat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 11275: wariner (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9258 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 13813: smooth (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 14210: simpic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (319 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Meh...  Whatever.  Don't really care about typos anymore.  Lol.  But yeah, that guy.


Ah, so there's the difference between Chelsea's brass and Man City's brass.  Man City supports their manager and brings the manager what he needs to run the club his way.  I think we'll see a better expression of the beautiful game with Mascara at Man City than Mascara at Chelsea. 

The good thing about it tho is the Chelsea brass would prolly see their own shortcomings.

I don't think so. I tried using referral links on the forum, and the best I got was ~15 referrals per day. So, the best you'll get is $15-$20 daily (assuming transactions are always less than $200), and there might be days without a single click. Therefore, as a user, signature campaigns are better than referral links.


System abuse can be easily detected by tracking repetitions.
Referral links are good for YouTubers if their content creation costs are low.

It was really shocking to think like that haha.

That I read after hugeblack's reply but thank zwei for mentioing it as the section 4.2.11, 4.4, clears it all. It is abusive.

Well, he's the only available Pep student right now - Arteta and Kompany are untouchable.

Enzo did well at the City Academy, was promoted as Pep's assistant, and they performed wonders together before moving on to the Championship. I am not sure how to prove this, but I am positive Pep chose him as his successor. I still cannot believe we lost him. 

I was totally against it and wasn't happy with the sack although Enzo has been a real bitch for some time now but still doesn't warrant the brown "envelope" he was growing some wings from being a "Yes sir " manager to some strong head one and that's exactly what the owners hates. They only want to be in charge and never want to be told how to run their shit.

He's a good manager tactically and would do well with freedom and money at Manchester city if he replaces Pepe.


Enzo Maresca is Enzo Mascara    ( means Enzo autopilot) sounds well when I call him that - I've infected few members here


Manchester city owner sees him as the perfect Pep replacement - reported by several tie1 journalists.

Team play is very important. Injuries are a normal part of the game. If the combination of play is not right, multiple injuries can bring bad times for the team. Every player of Arsenal can now make a good impact. Rice, Saliba both are  plays an important role . On the other hand, Manchester City has overcome the previous bad situation and has improved a lot. They have played good in the last month. Aston Villa is giving them tough competition in the point table.

And 2% gain from 2017 ATH (413 USD x 420 USD now)

While bitcoin had a 400% gain from 2017 ATH (20k x 90 k now)

Ok, you had a great gain if you bought XMR in January 2025... If you were holding long term, lost a lot of money compared to other coins and assets.

This month 114 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

And that's it, 2025 is over. It's time for the results.

But first, let's summarize the performance of altcoins, which we can definitely call shitcoins.
Only a few shitcoins manage to outperform BTC. The big winners are Monero and gold.
Here is the bloodbath :

Alts	Evol 2025	Alts	Evol 2025
Monero (XMR)	95,72	CHEQD Network (CHEQ)	-81,66
Tether Gold (XAUT)	60,17	Aptos (APT)	-82,02
PAX Gold (PAXG)	59,38	The Sandbox (SAND)	-82,37
BNB (BNB)	21,78	DOG•GO•TO•THE•MOON (Runes) (DOG)	-82,48
Grin (GRIN)	21,52	Saros (SAROS)	-82,87
EURC (EURC)	13,48	WAX (WAXP)	-83,20
Hyperliquid (HYPE)	7,93	Pyth Network (PYTH)	-83,38
Jupiter Perpetuals Liquidity Provider Token (JLP)	2,26	SPACE ID (ID)	-83,74
Tether (USDT)	-0,12	Raydium (RAY)	-83,93
DAI (DAI)	-0,16	Zksync (ZK)	-83,95
BCGame Coin (BC)	-0,73	THORChain (RUNE)	-83,96
Ethereum (ETH)	-10,35	dogwifhat (WIF)	-84,76
Bitcoin (BTC)	-12,52	Wojak (WOJAK)	-85,13
Peercoin (PPC)	-26,70	Hana (HANA)	-86,24
Litecoin (LTC)	-38,17	WOO (WOO)	-86,30
Solana (SOL)	-41,05	Kekius Maximus (KEKIUS)	-87,09
XRP (XRP)	-43,21	Wormhole (W)	-87,26
MX (MX)	-45,58	Axie Infinity (AXS)	-87,46
Chainlink (LINK)	-47,00	dYdX (DYDX)	-87,49
Bitget Token (BGB)	-47,67	Brett (BRETT)	-89,20
Pendle (PENDLE)	-50,66	Eigenlayer (EIGEN)	-89,34
Aave (AAVE)	-52,99	NEURALAI (NEURAL)	-89,35
SPX6900 (SPX)	-53,24	ResearchCoin (RSC)	-89,45
Bitget Wallet Token (BWB)	-55,67	Sonic (S)	-90,53
Chainflip (FLIP)	-63,09	Goatseus Maximus (GOAT)	-90,64
XDC Network (XDC)	-63,52	Celestia (TIA)	-90,92
Waves (WAVES)	-63,63	Dogs (DOGS)	-91,40
Tezos (XTZ)	-63,65	ChainGPT (CGPT)	-91,43
GMX (GMX)	-67,85	Vanar Chain (VANRY)	-92,22
Dogecoin (DOGE)	-68,94	Ronin (RON)	-92,67
Avalanche (AVAX)	-69,23	MOG (MOG)	-92,91
Cardano (ADA)	-69,51	OPEN GPU (OGPU)	-93,00
Toncoin (TON)	-69,71	Odos (ODOS)	-93,32
Orca (ORCA)	-70,08	Hamster Kombat (HMSTR)	-93,36
Morpho (MORPHO)	-70,38	Usual (USUAL)	-95,44
Kaspa (KAS)	-70,51	NEM (XEM)	-95,46
Sui (SUI)	-70,59	ParallelAI (PAI)	-95,52
Cosmos Hub (ATOM)	-70,71	Catbal ($CATBAL)	-96,23
Hedera (HBAR)	-70,72	Zero1 Labs (DEAI)	-96,45
NEAR Protocol (NEAR)	-70,74	LinqAI (LNQ)	-96,59
LayerZero (ZRO)	-73,43	Aleph Zero (AZERO)	-96,72
Internet Computer (ICP)	-73,75	SuiPad (SUIP)	-96,75
Jupiter (JUP)	-76,09	Hyperlauncher (LAUNCH)	-96,79
FLOKI (FLOKI)	-76,65	Supra (SUPRA)	-96,91
Filecoin (FIL)	-76,83	PAAL AI (PAAL)	-96,99
Hawk Tuah (HAWKTUAH)	-77,77	aether collective (AETHER)	-98,56
Pepe (PEPE)	-77,78	Tomarket (TOMA)	-98,67
Ethena (ENA)	-78,13	Lenfi (LENFI)	-99,20
Polygon (MATIC)	-78,78	KIKICat (KIKI)	-99,75
Cartesi (CTSI)	-78,99	HIVE  (HIVE)	-99,88
Minima (MINIMA)	-79,91	Krypton DAO (KRD)	-99,92
IoTeX (IOTX)	-79,97	Vapor (VAPOR)	-99,96
Livepeer (LPT)	-80,00	Meme TrumpCoin (TRUMP)	-99,97
Realio Network Token (RIO)	-81,49	Akuma Inu (AKUMA)	-99,98
Injective (INJ)	-81,55

                        

Now, let's move on to the individual rankings.

The general graph, but we can't see anything.



Here is what you have been waiting for:

Pos	Users	31/12/2025
1	internetional	1 260,76
2	paid2	1 220,88
3	LoyceV	1 198,08
4	Halab	1 151,09
5	GazetaBitcoin	1 041,95
6	sompitonov	930,82
	Bitcoin	874,81
7	DireWolfM14	821,98
8	memehunter	800,13
9	examplens	746,70
10	ajiz138	656,18
11	icopress	598,04
12	n0nce	527,45
13	B1g4udge	480,78
14	FinneysTrueVision	479,49
	Average	476,40
15	rat03gopoh	463,46
16	shahzadafzal	444,93
17	DYING_S0UL	425,33
18	Smartprofit	422,18
19	GrosWesh	397,12
20	Rikafip	388,15
21	Despairo	337,21
22	jokers10	332,92
23	LogitechMouse	328,47
24	SamReomo	319,81
25	Saint-loup	311,89
	Random_but_balanced	294,28
26	Taskford	293,33
27	tokeweed	287,41
28	xandry	278,98
29	cryptofrka	235,41
30	Woodie	223,82
31	klarki	223,12
32	worldofcoins	204,11
33	Buchi-88	201,36
34	bitmover	185,88
35	famososMuertos	180,52
36	arallmuus	171,39
37	libert19	165,05
38	Koal-84	131,81
39	xLays	99,82
40	slackovic	88,12

                  

Congratulations to internetional, paid2, and LoyceV.

The most surprising thing is that, for once, the winner didn't select the best-performing shitcoin (XMR). It was all about the proportions of his selection.

As usual, I will wait 2-3 days so that everyone can check that I haven't made a mistake. Then I will contact the winners by PM to ask for their BTC address so I can send the rewards.
(What worries me a little is that paid2's last login date is 28/11. I hope he's looking to buy his third house and he will be back soon).

Thank you for this year, it was truly special (a little thought for Woodie ), and the suspense was definitely there.
Be careful when trading shitcoins, don't forget to take your profits.


For the other contest, I won't hide the fact that it seems compromised (or else I will have to go through the hassle of charging participants an entry fee...).

Iskreno, planirao sam izbaciti pregled sutra jer sam lijen, ali psoto me danas pitao Daniel kad ce lokalni pregled, evo ga sada. 

Kao i svaki put do sada, pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Studeni 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Studenog 2025

Tijekom Studenog napisali smo 237 postova, sto je pad u odnosu na Listopad (289 postova). Slican pad je bio i na ostalim boardovima tako da nismo tu nikakva iznimka, jednostavno slabiji mjesec.

---

Analiza merita za Studeni 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca na nasem boardu je podijeljeno 228 merita, sto je pad u odnosu na listpadskih 281 merit. S obzirom na slican pad broja pootova, ovo ne iznenadjuje. Unatoc tome, mislim da je i ovih 228 merita odlican rezultat, u prosjeku skoro 1 merit po postu.




Evo i liste svih koji su podijelili te primili merit tijekom proslog mjeseca. Na vrhu posiljatelja je i ovaj put Pmalek sa 63 podijeljena merita dok je na vrhu primatelja katanic sa 47.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Studenog 2025

I za kraj pregleda, popis svih clanova koji su ostavili makar 1 post na nasem boardu. slackovic je sacuvao svoje 1. mjesto i sad kad je u punoj aktivnosti, tesko ce ga itko svrgnuti sa trona, a daleko iza njega su ovcijisir na 2. te katanic97 na 3. mjestu. Ono sto veseli je povratak Daniel91, koji ce nadam se jos vise aktivirati na nasem boardu.

1. slackovic [50]
2. ovcijisir [32]
3. katanic97 [27]
4. Rikafip [25]
5. Pmalek [24]
6. dkbit98 [15]
7. examplens [14]
8. cryptofrka [13]
9. Trofo [9]
10. Daniel91 [7]
11. CroBoy12 [7]
12. paco92x [7]
13. btcltcdigger [2]
14. EXMON [2]
15. fujn [1]
16. Basil Rusakov [1]
17. powray [1]

U just checked it now and it shows merits correctly for my profile.
I can see the same 8413 merit number in forum profile and on BPIP website, but 8402 number is still visible under earned merits on BPIP website.
Maybe it needs more time to update everything, but I never paid much attention to this.

There is a lot of manipulation in this market, but some people finally realized the real value of having privacy coin that is full fungible, so yes monero performed very good this year.
If you look at street price than difference is even more obvious.

I many websites that seel stuff I always see bitcoin and monero on top, with all other coins being more like statistical error.

Silver also increased a lot, but I don't know the exact numbers.
They delisted monero from most centraslized exchange and they did everyone a favor
Even Splash exchgange said that monero coins are gone very quickly and they are not easy to purchase for a good price.

It's only listed as Zec on centralized exchanges and that is not private at all, that is only optional with addresses starting with Z.
This coins is probablycreated by one middleeast government agency I would never use it.