There are many ways that new members could be advised and informed about the rules before, during and after registering. Ultimately, having a checkbox does imply they have understood the rules therefore if they are in breach they will probably not be able to complain if a temporary or permanent ban was imposed on them.

I think they only get message about ban, but without any explanation whatsoever.
It's reasonable to think that outside bitcointalk forum many people don't know anything about mixer ban, especially new services.

That sounds good.
Anything is better than what we have now.
Few years ago I knew people who couldn't even register in forum because of evil fees, and they never used forum before that

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13943 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4624 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 10292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2462 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2512 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9160 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 1633 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +37 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2367 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 466 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6393 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 1853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1507 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 12897 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6014 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 9469 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +141 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3176 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (22) 4175 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11206 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 11450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2490 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4286 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +33 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (25) 6232 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2955 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9161 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1340 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3865 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1472 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3600 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1115 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +13 / =6 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1111 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 6572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1829 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2185 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 5131 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 15095 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2173 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3160 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1170 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9094 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3336 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2437 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11250 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3266 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 19820 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2458 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5295 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +42 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3411 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3852 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 819 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1108 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5416 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 7638 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1803 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9286 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 644 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6750 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 203: HostFat (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Yes, those two which are in the first page. When I've posted it, it's not working but now it's working, the clear link. I'll post my experience here too.

This is the big problem with AML analysis. The information is so weak that it leaves the person doubting the information they receive.

Perhaps soon some tool will emerge that helps to understand a little more about what is involved in each address. I can't say more for now.

that's probably exactly how it will go 

if i were you, i wouldn't risk it tbh. if the accounts you created have long been inactive, or if you never played on them using bonuses, i don't think they will find an issue with you or even link the accounts.
unless you used the same personal info they ask for before you can play, or the same deposit/withdraw address.

and if the accounts have been inactive for more than 2 years, they are probably already deleted.

Nakon sto sam napravio 3 pregleda ovaj mjesec, red je za da zavrsim sa godisnjim pregled naseb boarda. Chartovi i tablice su napravljeni uz pomoc pomoc @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboarda i @TryNinja BitList koje preporucam da provjerite ako zelite vise informacija.

---

Tijekom 2025 na nasem boardu je napisano 3280 postova, sto je ogroman rast u odnosu na 2024 tijekom koje je napisano 2221 post. Za rast su prvenstveno zasluzni par novih clanova, te povratak par forumskih veterana.

Sto se tice sastava boarda po rankovima koje mozete vidjeti na pie chartu i na tablici, tu se stvar nije promjenila u odnosu na 2024, te i dalje dominiraju Legendary clanovi, a godinu zavsravamo i bez aktivnih Full Member i Newbie clanova.

Samo da dodam da sam ovdje uzeo u obzir samo clanove koji su napisali 10+ postova tijekom prosle godine, kao nekakav minimum da bi se netko smatrao aktivnim clanom.

#

|

Legendary

|

Hero

|

Sr Member

|

Full Member

|

Member

|

Jr Member

|

Newbie

|

___

|

_________________

|

_________________

|

_________________

|

_________________

|

_________________

|

_________________

|

_________________

|

1

|

slackovic [442]

|

katanic97 [428]

|

paco92x [100]

|

|

VoxelX [28]

|

CroBoy12 [95]

|

|

2

|

ovcijisir [352]

|

btcltcdigger [227]

|

BitGoba [22]

|

|

joker404 [10]

|

|

|

3

|

Pmalek [346]

|

SirJohnVonSlotty [64]

|

|

|

|

|

|

4

|

Rikafip [336]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

5

|

examplens [232]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

6

|

dkbit98 [196]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

7

|

Trofo [194]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

8

|

cryptofrka [182]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

9

|

Daniel91 [22]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

10

|

GazetaBitcoin [10]

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

---

Sto se tice merita, i tu smo imali veliki rast, tako da je tijekom 2025 na nasem boardu podijeljeno cak 2562 merita (tijekom 2024 podijeljeno je samo 1026).

Listu posiljatelja predvodi Pmalek sa 621 meritom, dok je na vrhu liste primatelja katanic97 sa cak 674 merita, sto je sigurno rekord kad je nas board u pitanju. Punu listu mozete naci na linku ispod screenshota.


https://public.tableau.com/shared/Z6XQYR858?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

---

I za kraj  pregleda, lista svih koji su napisali makar 1 post na nasem boardu tijekom 2025 godine, koja je za 20 clanova rjaca u odnosu na 2024.

Zahvaljujuci jakoj zavrsnici slackovic je sprijecio iznenadjenje te je i prosle godine bio nas najaktivniji clan, katanic97 se mora zadovoljiti sa 2.mjestom, dok je jos jedan povratnik, ovcijsir zavrsio na 3. mjestu. Medalje ce vam biti poslane postom.

Nisam još došao do dijela gdje radim withdraw, ali vidio sam da korisnici koji su duže u tome pišu da je obično pravilo da se withdraw može raditi jednom dnevno. Naravno da je potrebno napraviti KYC ali pretpostavljam da je to obaveza nakon što prođeš challenge i kreneš trgovati "za stvarno".

Da, dobro si razumio. Platiš određeni iznos (70-80 dolara je najmanja cijena koju sam pronašao) da bi dobio demo account koji onda koristiš kako bi pokazao da znaš trejdati s profitom.


Zapravo, sad sam provjerio i ovakva je situacija. Platiš $90 za two-step challenge. Ako zadovoljiš pravila, dobiješ 5000 USDT za trejdanje. Ako želiš veći funding, challenge košta više. Isto tako i one-step challenge košta više od two-step challenge ali isto tako ima i stroža pravila.


S ovim se apsolutno slažem. Ali ovdje nije baš da besplatno trguješ s izmišljenim novcem. Ipak si uložio nešto svog novca (minimalno 90 dolara) da se dokažeš. Ako uspiješ, dobit ćeš funded account gdje ćeš trejdati i većina zarade ostaje tebi. Želim reći da se ipak ovakav demo account razlikuje od klasičnog demo accounta gdje besplatno dobiješ neke novce i onda trguješ. Kod ovog demo accounta ćeš ipak paziti kako trguješ jer ako padneš, ostaješ bez 90 dolara koje si platio i bez funded accounta.

I would say it's not as simple as taking the % of dangerous or suspicious sources and making that the score level.

If you have 10% of "dangerous sources", would you say there is only a 10% chance of getting funds blocked when sending them to an annoying exchange? I would say the chances are higher if it comes from confirmed stolen coins (i.e a big exchange hack).

I've seen an AML scoring service just putting a big warning on an address just because it had a small percentage of coins linked to an exploit. I don't agree with that, but some exchanges will take measures if there is even a small chance you're an "bad actor" trying to launder money (as they would say).

That's a cheap deal all thanks to Amorim but I'm certain Barcelona won't be able to afford it, they're just going to milk him and let him go after the season so they will be able to register another kid in his place. He's worth more than Ł26m in today's market but no where near Ł325k/week.


Xabi Alonso managed 98% of their Champions League games, hence he is mainly to blame for their current position. The interim manager was only in charge of two Champions League games, one win and one loss. If Xabi had gained as many points as feasible, one loss would not have left them in this situation.

Real Madrid fans once booed Ramos and Marcelo too - they're spoilt brats...

I wouldn't do that, to be honest. Many services just refund the coins to the address that sent the coins.

Imagine you send 0.01 BTC to make a swap and the website sends it back to Duel? Now you have to contact their support and who knows if they will help you out...

100% put your wallet in the middle. Duel -> wallet -> swap service. No excuse to save $0.30 in fees.

His post indicates that he belongs to the category of foolish scammers who think that the members here are naive and will believe any nonsense they post, even if it's within a thread like this that exposes them.

He probably found the thread through a search engine, because the difference between the last post in this thread and his new one is more than 10 months. Therefore, it is most likely that this is a new scammer who is also impersonating Adv3ntur0us.

In any case, every member should make sure they are dealing with the real person through their PGP signature which is generated by signing a text with their private key, and not just through an encrypted message like the one this scammer sent.. Most scammers take advantage of people’s lack of technical knowledge to deceive them.

I mean sure...  But compare the pressure a manager receives between Real Madrid and Liverpool, from what we've seen the Real Madrid brass is way more demanding with their managers than the guys at Fenway Sports Group. 

Alonso will prolly be give another season in Liverpool and his history at the club will be seriously considered...  In Real Madrid?  Nope! 

That's like telling every new user about the existence of mixers
It would be better if the registration page has a link to the Unofficial forum rules. Or continue the mythical welcome message

Most mixers use their URL as username. Allowing them to post means they'll continue advertising their mixer.

I have a better idea.

Make the checkbox say "I have read the Forum Rules", and then link to the Unofficial Rules thread.

I think he was asking about a withdrawal using fiat but I think that complicates things a bit. If the casino uses a third-party processor so that people can deposit cryptocurrencies on the site by paying with fiat, normally you will be only able to withdraw cryptocurrencies and, if anything, exchange them for fiat using a third party after the withdrawal.

I've asked a similar question before; note the answer.

I have some doubts as to whether they will give more details about the classification. At least they're cheaper than other services that provide the same information.

Perhaps the problem is this ban. For a crypto service owner who is generally unfamiliar with forum rules, advertising that service on Bitcointalk makes sense. Now, if a mixer is announced, the topic should be removed and the user should be warned, not banned. Especially if this was one of their first posts.

I think the issue is more the lack of information communicated to those who see their posts deleted. Users rarely find out the real reason why a post is deleted, unless they enter investigation mode. The information regarding this should be clearer than a simple generic message saying "you did not comply with the forum rules," always leaving the question "which ones?".
But that's a different discussion altogether...

Well, I had to try.

From clicking the Withdraw button to seeing the pending BTC transaction on my wallet in... 30 seconds. Literally.

$0.30 fee, so very reasonable.

I think CCE cash and Trevoid are the best options in my experience. I have made deals with both of them.

Both accept low values, so you can use them even for a few bucks.

I never said he was; I was against to the move and predicted he'd be fired if he didn't win the Spanish league - he's no different than Arne Slot, but I think he'd do a better job. He knows the team so well; he understands the culture and banter. Both Amorim and Xabi destroyed a promising profession in pursuit of higher cash.

I never said he was; I was against to the move and predicted he'd be fired if he didn't win the Spanish league - he's no different than Arne Slot, but I think he'd do a better job.

He knows the team so well; he understands the culture and banter. Both Amorim and Xabi destroyed a promising career in pursuit of higher cash.

It’s probably quite common for people to create multiple accounts not to abuse bonuses, but simply because they forgot their old ones or wanted to test the platform again after a long break.
The issue is that casinos usually don’t care about intent — in their eyes, multi-accounting is still multi-accounting. If their system links those accounts, denying it won’t help. The safest option is to contact support yourself, explain the situation, and ask them to keep one account. If you actually plan to use the casino, it’s better to sort this out yourself now rather than wait until Betfury notices it later.

Sometimes situation like this exist especially on early days of our registration on Betfury since there are instances that either we might forget our account or even the email we used. Then with that situations we struggle to recover the first account we created.

But I think its also good to make them aware about situation especially if we remember that we have old account that we didn't used. So if happens that we win huge Just assuming that it will happen lol  We won't get any problem if there's some verification process will happen.

examplens je to pisao, nisam ja. I ja sam učestvovao u tim AML bot tombolama ali nisam bio sretni dobitnik. Ako bi me izvukli, svakako bi se javio u ovu temu i spomenuo da i ja imam AML provjera na bacanje.

Pa i nije. Koliko god da je neko protiv ideje o prljavim coinima, realnost je da je takvo vrijeme došlo i biti protiv toga ne znači ništa. Ko hoće da koristi centralizovane mjenačnice, mora da prihvati da će igrati po njihovim pravilima. Možeš ti njima govoriti da ne postoji "tainted bitcoin" i da je sav BTC isti koliko hoćeš ali ako ti ga zaplijene, izgubio si osim ako ne ispoštuješ njihove zahtjeve. Ko to ne želi ili zna da ne može, bolje da izbjegava CEX-ove i custodial servise i traži druga rješenje, koja srećom postoje.

Few years ago I started making yearly overview of the local board activity as a way to compare the progress (or regress), and time has come for 2025 overview.  All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but I hope that's something that will change this year.

---

Post activity per local board during 2025

During the last year, 161066 posts were made across local boards that are part of this overview, which is a considerable 15% decrease compared to 2024 (192417 posts). Its no surprise that Nigerian local board ended up at the top, followed by Russian and Turkish local boards, while at the same time, Romanian, Greek and Polish are once again at the far left part of the chart.

Also, it is obvious from the chart that majority of local boards had decreased activity, while only a few like Nigerian, Pilipinas and Croatian had a decent growth.

---

Active members per local board during 2025

During 2025, 5154 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards, which is negligent decrease compared to 2024's number (5188). Surprising thing though is that Russian board leads this chart and not Nigerian, and by quite some margin.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during 2025

Another chart that shows how many active members each board had during the last year, but this one is more detailed and shows the how many of each type of posters boards have, giving us the better picture of local boards.

So, for example, even though Russian board has double the amount of members that Nigerian board has, the latter has much stronger "core" group of members that wrote 100+ posts during the above mentioned period.

---

Merit shared per local board during 2025

Given the increase of merit sources across local boards, no surprise that almost all local boards had increased number of merit sent, compared to 2024. So, during the last year, 89244 merit was sent, compared to 2024's 75339 merit.

The one that obviously sticks out is Nigerian local that more than doubled the number of merit sent, and Croatian local that had ~150% increase owing it mainly to a few new very active members

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during 2025

Given the overall decrease of the number of posts written and increase of merit sent, no surprise that average meriit per post ratio during 2025 was 0.55, noticeable increased compared to 2024's 0.42 merit per post.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during 2025

As you can see, differences here are pretty huge, even among the local boards of the similar size. So, Romanian as the least active local board has the highest percentage of merietd posts, while at the same time the 3rd least active local board (Greek) has the lowest percentage of merited posts.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during 2025

During the last year, 1385 members sent while 1788 received merit, which is similar to 2024 numbers ( 1337 senders and 1388 receivers). I have to say that I expected much bigger numbers, considering the increase of merit sent.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during 2025

Its surprising to see Greek board with the highest merit per tx, since they have one of the lowest merit per post ratios. then again, in 2024 they had the highest merit per tx so I guess members there prefer to send merit there in bulk.

---

The most active members per local board during 2025

And for the end of the last year's overview, top 10 active members per local board. For the 4th year in a row leader is joker_josue from Portuguese board with 1948 posts, while 2nd and 3rd spot goes to two members from Russian local, klarki (1704) and Julien_Olynpic (1552). Gj guys, keep it up!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [1704]	|	1. MaxMueller [1132]	|	1. mandown [1397]	|	1. Ale88 [770]	|	1. joker_josue [1948]	|	1. famososMuertos [740]	|
2. Julien_Olynpic [1552]	|	2. Lakai01 [877]	|	2. execijutiere [991]	|	2. fillippone [698]	|	2. bitmover [1088]	|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [478]	|
3. jokers10 [1171]	|	3. cygan [745]	|	3. yenerbatmaz [788]	|	3. babo [654]	|	3. TryNinja [898]	|	3. darxiaomi [398]	|
4. zasad@ [1040]	|	4. Real-Duke [708]	|	4. Mustang Shelby [712]	|	4. giorgione [523]	|	4. sabotag3x [622]	|	4. Porfirii [383]	|
5. Alex077 [908]	|	5. MinoRaiola [692]	|	5. blomen [682]	|	5. Plutosky [455]	|	5. alegotardo [581]	|	5. Hispo [350]	|
6. Numeral [904]	|	6. Soonandwaite [660]	|	6. ajanwalker [648]	|	6. xenomorfo [410]	|	6. Forsyth Jones [473]	|	6. darbitmobilerecovery [253]	|
7. safar1980 [833]	|	7. Koal-84 [588]	|	7. Silence Scream [537]	|	7. Lillominato89 [379]	|	7. Pumared [453]	|	7. danadc [161]	|
8. xandry [755]	|	8. Unknown01 [530]	|	8. Black Mbaye [523]	|	8. gbianchi [339]	|	8. rdluffy [423]	|	8. Hagart [137]	|
9. Etranger [577]	|	9. willi9974 [501]	|	9. W Jr. [515]	|	9. conilmionome [328]	|	9. tg88 [385]	|	9. seoincorporation [127]	|
10. eisen33 [560]	|	10. mole0815 [475]	|	10. eightdots [504]	|	10. bastisisca [306]	|	10. criptoevangelista [369]	|	10. sausalitox [124]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [432]	|	1. patrickus [266]	|	1. gunhell16 [457]	|	1. slackovic [442]	|	1. Charles-Tim [778]	|	1. Kavelj22 [371]	|
2. mu_enrico [365]	|	2. Becassine [211]	|	2. Peanutswar [433]	|	2. katanic97 [428]	|	2. Floxynice [451]	|	2. khaled0111 [307]	|
3. punk.zink [278]	|	3. Danydee [205]	|	3. blockman [398]	|	3. ovcijisir [352]	|	3. Jubilee58 [350]	|	3. yhiaali3 [305]	|
4. joniboini [271]	|	4. Saint-loup [142]	|	4. cryptoaddictchie [385]	|	4. Pmalek [346]	|	4. Joy- maker [342]	|	4. GxSTxV [120]	|
5. MAAManda [254]	|	5. G.Seed [105]	|	5. Mr. Magkaisa [335]	|	5. Rikafip [336]	|	5. Africolo [339]	|	5. satoshyat.team [102]	|
6. Luzin [253]	|	6. paid2 [95]	|	6. bhadz [315]	|	6. examplens [232]	|	6. Tonimez [332]	|	6. OmegaStarScream [77]	|
7. abhiseshakana [228]	|	7. yohannc [44]	|	7. tech30338 [298]	|	7. btcltcdigger [227]	|	7. Makus [326]	|	7. BADERO [76]	|
8. jcojci [209]	|	8. GrosWesh [36]	|	8. arwin100 [286]	|	8. dkbit98 [196]	|	8. Yablee0 [320]	|	8. hugeblack [71]	|
9. Husna QA [209]	|	9. Halab [33]	|	9. GreatArkansas [277]	|	9. Trofo [194]	|	9. Mate2237 [314]	|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [69]	|
10. maydna [195]	|	10. oscar2000 [32]	|	10. Fredomago [261]	|	10. cryptofrka [182]	|	10. Mpamaegbu [308]	|	10. albon [53]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [242]	|	1. Bitcoin Smith [357]	|	1. Ultegra134 [125]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [203]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [723]	|	1. DYING_S0UL [219]	|
2. pawel7777 [73]	|	2. JSRAW [272]	|	2. cryptosize [112]	|	2. NeuroticFish [91]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [414]	|	2. Bd officer [204]	|
3. Tytanowy Janusz [41]	|	3. pawanjain [198]	|	3. condoras [97]	|	3. TryNinja [18]	|	3. ZAINmalik75 [330]	|	3. Crypto Library [192]	|
4. wwzsocki [40]	|	4. TheUltraElite [139]	|	4. alani123 [61]	|	4. othell_rogue [5]	|	4. Cheema02 [309]	|	4. Nothingtodo [127]	|
5. TryNinja [18]	|	5. IIrik11 [108]	|	5. BlackHatCoiner [54]	|	5. MJWALK [5]	|	5. MusaPk [275]	|	5. God Of Thunder [103]	|
6. stafstor [7]	|	6. LucyFurr [66]	|	6. apogio [37]	|	6. IonCreanga [4]	|	6. GbitG [243]	|	6. Z_MBFM [97]	|
7. EXMON [6]	|	7. libert19 [60]	|	7. Makis Kotzampasis [11]	|	7. UsdtBucuresti [4]	|	7. Rustam Meraj [194]	|	7. Shishir99 [91]	|
8. ertil [5]	|	8. M47AK16 [47]	|	8. Dimitris [8]	|	8. jedaite [3]	|	8. UmerIdrees [192]	|	8. Mahiyammahi [81]	|
9. stwenhao [5]	|	9. henry1111 [42]	|	9. BitcoinsGreece [6]	|	9. mihaybus [3]	|	9. Publictalk792 [184]	|	9. Review Master [78]	|
10. aaaaa1221 [4]	|	10. henmark [40]	|	10. coctailnuts [6]	|	10. Nzbindexer [3]	|	10. ThemePen [169]	|	10. LDL [63]	|

I've waited days to hear back from other sites before, so at least they're paying attention here. But man, this whole thing for just eleven bucks?

I get that it's the principle of the sitution, but at some point you gotta ask if it's worth the headache.

Doing a full KYC process with the passport and a selfie for the price of a couple of coffees just feels like a major chore.

I'd probably just get annoyed and forget about it. It's supposed to be fun. When I start having to argue and fight with support over chump change, it stops being a good experience.

I think the casino is being a bit ridiculous asking for it, and the player is getting way too worked up over it.

I will also agree with LoyceV because lightning network is different entirely from mixers. Mixers are what the government are banning which makes theymos later ban it on this forum.

That is an exchange with AML check and not a mixer designed like an exchange. There are still some centralized exchanges that has no KYC that I can use. I can send the exchange bitcoin and later withdraw bitcoin.

That's borderline, but I decided that it is a mixer. The part of the mixer definition I was debating was the "advertise that it's improving deposited coins' privacy somehow" part. Without that "we offer a fast and cost-effective exchange into clean, AML-free assets" quote, I probably would've allowed it, since the site itself and most of the other materials I saw didn't seem to advertise privacy enhancement. (The site itself being no-KYC isn't a privacy enhancement of the coins, so that part is irrelevant.)

you have nothing to worry about, there are others doing exactly that with no problems.

let me guess, did someone wearing duel.com signature hurt your little feelings game-protect?

i thought it was fake when i saw it the other day, but oh boy, it was real... crazy shit.

I haven't encountered one brother, and I will question the intention if there is one. I hold on to my belief, not your keys, not your coins.
The platform is only a few months old and has very little information and no legit reviews. OP falls to every holder's mistake, and that is doing research first, again, another costly error.

✅ Block 933758 ✅

The winner is examplens — congratulations on your win!🎉

Yeah I forgot about him, he was Salah's biggest tool -  Salah's strength is just pace, now there's no one putting him on those passes as Trents used to.

VVD has been awful recently, he needs help but Slot needs to go too too. .