Last update: 2026-09-29_Tue_15.12h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67191407 (unedited backup) (by antiswap) (scraped on Tue Sep 29 15:11:01 CEST 2026) in [ANN] AntiSwap - Fight AML Scam | Exchanger Monitoring | en.antiswap.io:
Thank you all for the thoughtful questions and suggestions. There are several important points here, so I will answer them in detail.
It seems that your platform is bigger than I thought; how do you manage to monitor, 502 fraudulent, 353 fair, and 190 neutral exchangers. I read somewhere you mentioned that you do a kind of mutual review. How feasible is that?
Our review-monitoring processes are already well established, and we continue improving them. We pay particular attention to negative reviews and disputes involving withheld funds.
If a review was submitted by a real customer, we cannot remove it simply because the exchanger asks us to do so - even if the problem is eventually resolved. The customer, the exchanger and AntiSwap can all add public comments explaining what happened and how the case was resolved, but the original history remains visible.
We also plan to publish the number of completed transactions for each exchanger soon and keep these figures updated. This will provide users with another objective data point when choosing an exchanger.
Routine monitoring of new reviews is not actually the most difficult part. The much larger task was processing the initial database containing millions of historical reviews. We reviewed that history and recorded the detected scam cases in detail, including the amounts blocked by exchangers whenever this information was available.
Is there a possibility for a listed fraudulent exchange to become neutral or fair in the future, when they solve all their scam accusations and improve operations?
Yes. A fraudulent exchanger can return to Neutral or Fair status after resolving the problems with
all affected customers and demonstrating improved conduct.
This has already happened - but it is a very rare case, and only when the exchanger is genuinely interested in continuing to operate honestly. In most situations, a scam exchanger remains a scam. The original reviews are not deleted, and our comments explaining the exchanger's status change remain public. Users can therefore see both the original problem and how it was resolved.
This also gives us a useful form of pressure. Many exchangers do not want to stay on the scam list, and that has pushed some of them to return funds to customers even after they first refused to do so without KYC. Those cases please us most - they show that the work is not in vain.
In fact, this was one of the main reasons AntiSwap was created - to help stop the spread of AML scam and encourage exchangers to deal with customers honestly. To be frank, we believe we have already achieved some meaningful results in this area.
Imagine that a scammer launched an exchange, submit $20k escrow with you, scam $100k and pretentiously complete a $20k swap, then apply to be compensated from the escrow. If this happens, it means the scammer successfully took back the amount they escrowed.
How do you plan to solve this situation when it arises.
This is a possible attack scenario, and it would be dishonest to claim that it can be physically excluded. If a fabricated transaction is prepared carefully enough, it may be impossible to distinguish it conclusively from a genuine transaction.
This is one reason we always advise users that the amount of an exchange must
never exceed the exchanger's available deposit.
If anything starts going wrong during a transaction, the customer should contact us and leave a review
immediately. This allows us to suspend the exchanger before additional users are affected.
If there are several accepted claims against a limited deposit, the available deposit is distributed proportionally among the claimants. Therefore, in the scenario you described, a sufficiently convincing fraudulent claimant could theoretically receive part of the same deposit alongside genuine victims.
There is, however, a stronger option for users who want additional protection: the required part of an exchanger's deposit can be reserved specifically for a particular transaction through AntiSwap.
We temporarily reserve that amount so it cannot be used for other claims or withdrawn while the transaction is in progress. Once the exchange is completed successfully, the reserved amount is released back into the exchanger's available deposit.
Users rarely request this, but the option is available. If someone wants to reserve an exchanger's deposit for a transaction, they can contact us directly - arranging it is not a problem.
I think it will be better to translate the ANN OP post into multiple languages to spread information about the antiswap service. This can help the service to grow more in my point of view.
In this case, as an Urdu speaker, I can help translate the OP into Urdu. Similarly, you guys can ask other campaign participants to help with translating ANN into their native languages. Later on, you guys can add all translations in the ANN OP in its footer. What do you guys think about this?
We like this idea. Thank you for suggesting it and for offering to help with the Urdu translation.
We will look at how other services organize translated announcement topics across BitcoinTalk's local boards. The idea is excellent overall, and it is something we should work on.
We have seen other exchange monitors operate on the forum and users expressed mixed views about them because it was believed that negative reviews were usually deleted to protect the image of the exchange, as Antiswap how do you handle negative reviews when exchange desputes it ??
A user can delete a review that they personally submitted. However, AntiSwap does not remove a genuine customer's review without that customer's approval, even when the original problem has been resolved.
Instead, the user, the exchanger and AntiSwap can add comments describing the dispute, the available evidence and its eventual resolution. This preserves the complete history instead of pretending the incident never happened.
We only remove reviews that we determine to be fabricated and not submitted by a real customer. Exchangers monitor their pages closely and regularly report reviews they believe to be false, but a complaint from an exchanger alone is not sufficient reason for deletion.
AntiSwap has public threads on several forums as well as a public Telegram chat. If we removed a genuine review without the customer's approval, that information could quickly become public. We have not had such a case.
Considering that it'll be quite hard to check over 900 exchangers manually, I'd like to propose mentioning the dates on which you last manually checked each one on their dedicated pages.
BTW, I noticed the English version doesn't seem to apply to exchangers' description & review parts (for some reason, Google Translate doesn't always pop-up either).
Displaying the date of the latest manual review is an interesting suggestion, and we will consider how to implement it in a useful way.
Regarding English translations of exchanger descriptions and reviews: you are right, this is needed. I have added it to our task list, and we intend to improve the English version in the near future.
Scam exchanges are the top content, and they are all still regularly linked. I don't think that is the best way to degrade scammers and warn others about it, it seems that they are privileged compared to 'fair' services.
You are right. It was time to move fraudulent exchangers to the bottom of the list, and this has now been done. The current order is more logical.
Originally, AntiSwap was primarily a catalogue of scam exchangers. When AML scam was only beginning to spread, our goal was to demonstrate that this problem was being ignored in our part of the internet. For that reason, scam exchangers were deliberately given the most prominent position.
Later, after seeing the positive response on the forums where we published our research, we decided to develop AntiSwap into a complete exchanger-monitoring platform. Many improvements and structural changes have been made since then, so keeping fraudulent exchangers at the top no longer reflected what the project had become.
I just noticed that access to your platform is prohibited or you are just offline. I see this error message: File not found. Is this message appearing for everyone else or just me?
The issue has been fixed. Thank you for pointing it out.
I took a look at your website, both the clearnet and Tor versions, and I have some feedback. The website seems to be down at the moment so I can't provide a proper example, but I noticed that if you enter an exchange pair and click on one of the exchangers in the results, it won't always load the page with the correct trading pair selected. For instance, I tried with a swap of BTC to USDT. In some cases, that's exactly the pair I see when I click on your results. In others, it shows something random like XMR to BTC. The second thing I noticed is that the Tor version is only available in Russian. There is an option to change the language to English but it doesn't work. At least it didn't switch languages on my end. That's too bad because I wanted to see what's different with the info shared on the onion site.
Thank you for checking both versions so carefully.
On the first point: this issue is not on our side. We pass the exact pair selected by the user to the exchanger in the request. Unfortunately, not every exchanger handles this parameter correctly, so some of them may open a different pair.
The English language switch on the Tor version has now been fixed. Thank you for pointing out our mistake.
Thank you again for the questions, criticism and practical suggestions. They help us identify where the platform and our explanations need to become clearer.
2. Post 67189688 (unedited backup) (by Bitcoin_Arena) (scraped on Mon Sep 28 23:20:01 CEST 2026) in Mixers to be banned:
While the conversation is taking place about whether the forum could have possibly been seized after
Sinbad was seized, there is a valid question that remains unanswered: If the fear was that advertising mixers or allowing them to operate signature campaigns could lead to the forum being seized, why was the Altoinstalks forum not seized even though promoted mixers throughout?
Altcointalks is incomparable to Bitcointalk, though, especially in terms of activity or site visitors. Those law enforcement agencies obviously first go for the most popular platforms. Which is why they would go for the likes of Chipmixer and leave out the smaller Bitcoin Mixers
Until recently, they were in the EU, but a few months ago the site was moved to servers outside the EU to avoid possible complications with the MiCA regulation. The owner is also not from the US, strange but it is possible that there are non-US sites.
Domain seizure can happen to any platform regardless of the jurisdictions they are operating in.
3. Post 67187559 (unedited backup) (by DesmondHayes) (scraped on Mon Sep 28 11:47:55 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Koliko sam video, dosta vlasnika kazina su iz drzava gde je gambling prohibited, ne znam hoce li im to predstavljati problem.
Ne smijes operirati u drzavi gdje nemas licencu. Zato dosta ekipe ne voli VPN-ove. Al opet, vole pare, tako da se zakoni savijaju lijevo i desno. Onda se jedan dan probudis, od jednom 60% prometa ti je iz drzave gdje nemas licencu, policija kuca na vrata, kompanije se gase.
e sad; uvijek mozes imati mirror site x par komada
4. Post 67187339 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Mon Sep 28 10:21:19 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Koliko sam video, dosta vlasnika kazina su iz drzava gde je gambling prohibited, ne znam hoce li im to predstavljati problem.
Ne smijes operirati u drzavi gdje nemas licencu. Zato dosta ekipe ne voli VPN-ove. Al opet, vole pare, tako da se zakoni savijaju lijevo i desno. Onda se jedan dan probudis, od jednom 60% prometa ti je iz drzave gdje nemas licencu, policija kuca na vrata, kompanije se gase.
OK to je zapravo razumljivo i logično i tko želi biti dugoročno u ovom businessu trebao bi paziti na ove stvari i poslovati legalno.
Dakle, po tvojim informacijama, uskoro ćemo vidjeti zatvaranje više sportskih kladionica koje se reklamiraju na ovom forumu, uključujući i signature kampanje koje vode na forumu?
Znači, opet će postati zanimljivo i ponovno će biti velika potražnja za mjestima u kampanjama koje su preživjele ovo turbulentno razdoblje.
Nema druge nego da se ti uključiš i pokreneš neku svoju signature kampanju?
Managere već imaš, TRofo i cryptofrka, provjerena lokalna mafija
5. Post 67187284 (unedited backup) (by SirJohnVonSlotty) (scraped on Mon Sep 28 09:54:43 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Koliko sam video, dosta vlasnika kazina su iz drzava gde je gambling prohibited, ne znam hoce li im to predstavljati problem.
Ne smijes operirati u drzavi gdje nemas licencu. Zato dosta ekipe ne voli VPN-ove. Al opet, vole pare, tako da se zakoni savijaju lijevo i desno.
6. Post 67186540 (unedited backup) (by rdluffy) (scraped on Mon Sep 28 00:13:43 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
I don't have Tor access; is the onion link working?
I have visited both the Onion link and clear net link on Tor and both are working pretty fine here. I must say that the Onion link loads faster in Tor because on clear net link one has to wait for that Cloud Flare verification while at Onion link one can easily complete the verification and access the site.
I was going to do a swap right now (or at least check the exchange rate to see if it's good), but the site is down for maintenance right now, hehehe
If it's not back up in an hour, I'll just wait until tomorrow
7. Post 67186459 (unedited backup) (by DesmondHayes) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 23:42:31 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Dosta kampanja je na HOLD-u
Ne bih htio siriti vijest i dijeliti linkove, ali cijela industrija je trenutno malo uzdrmana. Koga zanima moze me pingati preko TG-a.
Za ostale, pripazite sad sljedecih 2-3 tjedna, dosta operatora ce stat sa operacijom.
Jel to povezano sa nedavnim hakom i leakom podataka kod onog Curasao registra?
Vidim da su neki vec poceli cudno da se ponasaju, poput Bitslera na primer, koji je obrisao i zakjlucao ann thread, bez mnogo objasnjenja.
Koliko sam video, dosta vlasnika kazina su iz drzava gde je gambling prohibited, ne znam hoce li im to predstavljati problem.
8. Post 67184789 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 13:42:25 CEST 2026) in Suspicious PM from a newbie:
I assume that they are mostly bot accounts. How do they bypass evil restrictions at all?
My guess is most of them are proxybanned. We can't know for sure until they post or PM someone.
9. Post 67184729 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 13:16:37 CEST 2026) in Suspicious PM from a newbie:
This kind of PM is why i've disabled accepting PM from newbies. Most of them are spam or scam attempt, that i don't even even feel like to report.
Someone's been busy creating accounts:
Electrum
...
Note: Not all of those are scammers.
I only searched the last 20,000 accounts, so anything created in the last half year.
I assume that they are mostly bot accounts. How do they bypass evil restrictions at all?
My bet is they already have proxy or VPN with IP address that isn't included on evil list yet.
10. Post 67184394 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 10:08:13 CEST 2026) in Suspicious PM from a newbie:
11. Post 67184222 (unedited backup) (by MarryWithBTC) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 08:43:20 CEST 2026) in Suspicious PM from a newbie:
I received a very similar PM, but from a different account. Is this some new scam method?
User:
OfficialSupportTeambitcoiI cannot remember that I have ever participated in a similar discussion as the subject of this PM
I wonder why they are targeting old and experienced members. Newbies, jr members and member ranks should be their target because it's simply impossible for a legendary member to fall for this.
How about sparing a few minutes to reply them, and say that you are having an issue to see their next steps. Possibly they'll send you a link to download the real version of Electrum lol.
Hope, the newbie - newbie pm restriction is still functional.
12. Post 67184186 (unedited backup) (by FinneysTrueVision) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 08:18:55 CEST 2026) in Suspicious PM from a newbie:
I received a very similar PM, but from a different account. Is this some new scam method?
User:
OfficialSupportTeambitcoiI cannot remember that I have ever participated in a similar discussion as the subject of this PM
It’s an old scam method on Discord, Telegram, and Reddit. I guess they are now trying it here, but I doubt they will have much success because people are generally more experienced here. This kind of phishing attempt is most likely to succeed only against a complete newcomer to cryptocurrency. This forum also shows user activity, which for these accounts is much lower than you would expect from a customer support representative. If that’s not enough, there’s a giant red warning message.
13. Post 67184073 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 06:18:01 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
I don't have Tor access; is the onion link working?
I have visited both the Onion link and clear net link on Tor and both are working pretty fine here. I must say that the Onion link loads faster in Tor because on clear net link one has to wait for that Cloud Flare verification while at Onion link one can easily complete the verification and access the site.
14. Post 67183829 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Sun Sep 27 01:30:19 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
I don't have Tor access; is the onion link working?
Yes, it is. I did not have any problem at all accessing it recently.
15. Post 67181423 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 26 10:37:55 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 203:
HostFat (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 311 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (19) 10537 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 24140:
qwk (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5841 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1769 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11497 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4818 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 2899 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 3685 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2794 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (4) 10160 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 6991 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 9043 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2204 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +55 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6291 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2655 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2208 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (14) 6876 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (37) 1957 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2391 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2990 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 14016 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6277 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 6818 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 7036 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 3991 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 10884 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 787 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +41 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 4517 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 4057 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 549 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 11557 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 12254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 395806:
o_solo_miner (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 541 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4541 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2958 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4760 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 6381 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3166 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 533583:
Lucius (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 6793 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 10556 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 1430 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 459 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2290 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1520 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 4007 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1375 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3744 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1350 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 7076 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 2082 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2357 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 5177 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 4689 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2386 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3839 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (41) 13446 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1499 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2403 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2116 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 2676 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3694 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 7761 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 11381 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1634314:
shahzadafzal (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 3541 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4346 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1825672:
morvillz7z (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2224 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3537 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 21486 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3229 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2628 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (25) 2613 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 5865 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 5853 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +47 / =2 / -1) (
DT1! (5) 3826 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 1913 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1730 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4197 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 862 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1146 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5827 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 8371 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 10323 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1655 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 5396 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2745549:
decodx (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1000 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 10120 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6542 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1305 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3651 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 3558380:
Mia Chloe (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2292 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (
8893 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
935 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
15135 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
50 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
193 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. Post 67180970 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sat Sep 26 05:21:32 CEST 2026) in 🔥 CavemanSwap.com - || Free Raffle 🎟️ – $50 Prize Pool 💰:
Winner:
26 Barcode_
Winner 2:
47 chenille
Winner 3:
34 Pmalek
Giveaway ResultCongratulations!
Eligible:
02 knuckey
03 mv1986
04 Woodie
06 xandry
07 ovcijisir
08 Mehmet69
09 internetional
10 Ricardo11
12 tiCeR
13 TheButterZone
14 Smartprofit
16 klarki
18 Zlantann
19 GIF-JOBS
20 Zwei
21 Pandorak
22 PolarCrypto
23 DabsPoorVersion
25 bitmover
26 Barcode_
29 demonica
31 TheButterZone
33 ASloveapg
34 Pmalek
37 Hypnotizer
38 Warkop
39 Itz-prisigold
40 ChocolateBitcoinK
43 Improved
44 el che
45 examplens
47 chenille
49 Debbiecrypto
ineligible:
01 cumakoff
05 bitzizzix
15 f150
17 Yoona_As
27 RTX-G53
11 MuffinMaster
24 Ninja Primes
28 inearth
To ineligible participants: Do not participate in my raffles if you do not read the rules.
You guys are on my ignore list starting today
17. Post 67180380 (unedited backup) (by Odohu) (scraped on Fri Sep 25 23:06:25 CEST 2026) in How about Accumulating with DCA Strategy now:
Thanks for sharing this helpful too by Bitmover who, as always, have brought a lot of innovations to make the forum enjoyable. Since a lot of use plebs use the DCA strategy, this tool will be very helpful.
18. Post 67180183 (unedited backup) (by OrangeFren) (scraped on Fri Sep 25 22:17:49 CEST 2026) in OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison:
⚠️ Cake Wallet's Yesenia Gonzalez's Telegram account was hacked and the account is now attempting to convince people to install malware
Cake knew about this for over a week, but made NO PUBLIC WARNING
Multiple of Cake's partners are already affected
I saw her post on X, I'm not really convinced that a "hack" happened, I'd rather say that she installed or approved something that she shouldn't have.
Also, for partners who still install any add-ons or applications obtained through Telegram
It always surprises me how people who hold such positions that are sensitive to people's funds and data always end up being so dumb and careless through their accounts.
But huge blame goes to her for not making a quick alert in time. Maybe the damage could have been much smaller.
Luckily we haven't lost any money and neither has anyone else that was contact as far as we know.
However, as a result of the warning we published Cake's Vik has been attacking me personally in the DMs all day yesterday sending ominous messages such as:
Nah.. i see what you're doing.
It's not going to work
Everyone sees it
as well as stating:
Maybe your English is not good then
when I said nowhere in the warning did I claim that anyone lost money, just that people were affected (had to quarantine computers, rotate password, sessions, etc). I opted to post
another tweet clarifying this in case someone truly can't read and jumps to conclusions. The pressure didn' t stop. As the clock approached midnight Vik messaged me again to condemn me for making so many Tweets about it asking about "3 new fresh tweets?". At this point I opted to just troll him and told him he's right, 3 is not enough and that we must work together to get millions to see this warning. He replied I ought to "fuck off" and unfollowed the OrangeFren account on Twitter.
I told Vik yesterday that I like him and I like his team and their work. But I suppose he didn't believe me.
Currently I feel compelled to share that I longer hold this position and have migrated to Monfluo wallet on mobile for XMR.
A question that arises is would they share if they had a critical bug for a week? Or would they just roll out a patch, assume it's fine and attack anyone that posts about it?
I have shared the story with a friend that isn't into crypto, she's a neurosurgeon. She listened to the whole thing, then when I was done, she laughed and said "C'mon there was no hack. They're just scammers". She followed this with pointing to Yesenia's warning being on a protected account, to ignoring information about this for a week, to attacking me for sharing the warning... I personally don't believe this theory, but I'm concerned that Cake's PR is such that people draw such conclusions.
Are you guys really just not going to comment on the fact that you had this exchange listed on your website recently?
https://mistex.io/And now an hour after my swap never went through, that exchange has disappeared off your website. What the hell is that?!?!?! Are you serious right now?
This is an interesting case.
We had Mistex listed. You got in touch with a serious accusation against them. Due to them being new and the seriousness of the accusation we opted to immediately delist them to ensure if there's an exit scam underway more users don't end up falling for it. We continued to provide support to you in a timely manner and explained why they were delisted.
Mistex continue to be delisted until they implement a letter of guarantee to ensure no such accusations can be put forth in the future.
That said, you have sent your BTC to KuCoin's aggregate address. Not a deposit address, but an aggregate one (the one they send deposits to after confirming). Mistex does not have your BTC. We don't have your BTC. KuCoin has your BTC. Why did you sign and broadcast such a tx, I don't know. If Mistex showed you this address, then I'm wondering.... why? If a virus replaced your clipboard then why with this address? It's in nobody's interest for you to send your BTC to KuCoin. If I had to guess I would presume that you had KuCoin's address in your clipboard for some reason or Mistex showed you KuCoin's address by mistake due to a bug in some API integration...?
Regardless, as we have advised previously, you now ought to contact KuCoin, explain to them to erroneously sent BTC to their address and they ought to refund it.
19. Post 67177274 (unedited backup) (by splashed) (scraped on Fri Sep 25 00:40:55 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
@splashed, you really need to start thinking about adding an alternative to the DAI token. I noticed that there are fewer and fewer services that accept it, and the solutions when you have DAI in your wallet are becoming quite limited.
Maybe even add a rebranded DAI, or USDS, if you don't already want USDT or USDC. That would be an understandable decision.
btw, is your affiliate program functional? I shared the link at least 10 times, I don't think I was misled when they confirmed to me that they used Splash. I don't see any traces in the aff dashboard
Thank you for the DAI suggestion. We will start thinking about it.
Yes, our affiliate program is functional, we've been paying out users like @NotATether
20. Post 67177060 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 23:33:49 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
I tried again to create the order from the beginning, but I didn't even get to this part, and I got the CF error again.
Did you try to use the Onion link? I rarely ever have issues through Tor.
21. Post 67176479 (unedited backup) (by iv4n) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 20:49:37 CEST 2026) in Српски (Serbian):
Ovo deluje zanimljivo... Vlasnik Stake.com sa Balkana....
Micro jesi li to ti?
haha
@examplens vidim tvoj komentar tamo, sta se to desava? Tek malopre sam video Bitsler temu, nesto se tamo desava... Istrazivao bih jos malo, ali predug dan... mozda ti mozes da nas malo uputis.
22. Post 67176470 (unedited backup) (by logfiles) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 20:47:19 CEST 2026) in OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison:
⚠️ Cake Wallet's Yesenia Gonzalez's Telegram account was hacked and the account is now attempting to convince people to install malware
Cake knew about this for over a week, but made NO PUBLIC WARNING
Multiple of Cake's partners are already affected
I saw her post on X, I'm not really convinced that a "hack" happened, I'd rather say that she installed or approved something that she shouldn't have.
Also, for partners who still install any add-ons or applications obtained through Telegram
It always surprises me how people who hold such positions that are sensitive to people's funds and data always end up being so dumb and careless through their accounts.
But huge blame goes to her for not making a quick alert in time. Maybe the damage could have been much smaller.
23. Post 67175971 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 18:22:37 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
This is a screenshot after I clicked on "Confirm exchange", and after a few seconds, a CF error appeared.
I tried again to create the order from the beginning, but I didn't even get to this part, and I got the CF error again.
The other two services executed the orders without any problems, so I believe it is not due to my connection.
I just created an order and it worked fine.
24. Post 67175576 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 16:16:07 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :
The date is the same, so I am not 100% sure if that's the same case, but maybe it can help you recall something and you can contact that person directly or indirectly via Trevoid's help, considering that contact is still valid/available.
@Tręvoid If you could help, I would be grateful.
btw. That guy who left feedback on Monerica, was quite impatient and did it after 2 hours.
I don't mind leaving a negative review, but the way Monerica handles feedback is extremely slow.
Perhaps someone knows who was behind this accusation and will ask the user to return.
Are you considering speeding up the support team's response time, or at least adding ProtonMail or SimpleX?
25. Post 67175571 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 16:15:07 CEST 2026) in 🔥Sportbook and Casino: BITSLER > $10,000 DAILY Wagering contest < :
Whatever is happening, it is a rather strange decision to delete the first post and subject in a thread that has existed for 11 years. It's not like they pretended they didn't exist. At the same time, from the Wayback Machine to BitList, it is very easy to find everything that has been deleted.
After 11 years, getting some explanation would be quite correct
it's very unlikly, but could the account has been hacked?
or maybe someone new to the forum is trying to update the ANN, and didn't expect changing things to a dot would get this much attention.
anyway erasing the first post won't do much to contain or prevent any eventual damage if it's already done.
i'm pretty sure them removing the OP content has nothing to do with the CGA hacked records.
26. Post 67175566 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 16:13:43 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Has anyone used b1exch.to recently?
I just tried to create an order, or maybe I succeeded. But I didn't get the deposit address. Only the destination address showed up. At some point after the refresh, I got a Cloudflare error.
Did you press "confirm exchange" to create the order and get the deposit address?
This is a screenshot after I clicked on "Confirm exchange", and after a few seconds, a CF error appeared.
I tried again to create the order from the beginning, but I didn't even get to this part, and I got the CF error again.
The other two services executed the orders without any problems, so I believe it is not due to my connection.
I tried just now and it keeps forever spining. It is not working indeed.
27. Post 67175397 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 15:21:31 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Has anyone used b1exch.to recently?
I just tried to create an order, or maybe I succeeded. But I didn't get the deposit address. Only the destination address showed up. At some point after the refresh, I got a Cloudflare error.
Did you press "confirm exchange" to create the order and get the deposit address?
28. Post 67175282 (unedited backup) (by hosemary) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 14:38:25 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Has anyone used b1exch.to recently?
I just tried to create an order, or maybe I succeeded. But I didn't get the deposit address. Only the destination address showed up. At some point after the refresh, I got a Cloudflare error.
The deposit address isn't displayed there, and that's normal.
They will give you a deposit address in the next page after you click the "Confirm exchange" button.
I just tried to create a swap order and it worked without nay issues.
29. Post 67173935 (unedited backup) (by albon) (scraped on Thu Sep 24 01:25:44 CEST 2026) in Plexum: Cryptocurrency Exchange Monitoring:
Some fairly unknown exchanges are listed here, at least for us who are outside of Russia and for whom RUB conversion means nothing.
After that, the service does not offer anything spectacular, for which there are no better solutions.
They don’t only exchange RUB. They also exchange many crypto and stablecoins, as well as cash and others.
Every member should do their own research. Everyone also shouldn’t rely only on reviews, because I noticed that the reviews don’t include TXIDs and could be fake.
I also recommend avoiding exchange platforms that have a high minimum exchange amount. Everyone should check the platform’s legitimacy using different sources, not just this monitoring list, because many platforms may have simply paid a listing fee and been added without their reputation being checked.
Also, It’s clear that the OP only cares about promotional posts for the platform while ignoring customers’ questions and concerns, and I consider this unprofessional on their part.
30. Post 67173693 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 23:53:31 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
...
Look, for me it was and still is really hard to solve this captcha, I’ve even given up on doing a swap because of it
I think it would be an improvement if they switched to a captcha that’s a little easier to read for us
I know it's not a huge thing, but I’ve gone over 10 attempts a few times, it's annoying
Strange, but I'm glad someone else reported this problem.
I know that my eyes are not in the best condition, and I struggle quite a bit with captchas like this one on b1exch, but whenever I report something similar, someone with hawk eyes always appears to say that everything is great.
I wonder why no one opts for the Form spam trap. It does not bother humans, while it is an obstacle for bots
At least 2–5 attempts before I manage to get the captcha right. It is usually because of characters like "5, S, I, 1, 8, B, D, O." Whenever one or two or even several of these characters appear, it almost always ends up being a retry. It is surprisingly consistent to me. lol
31. Post 67173382 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 22:15:43 CEST 2026) in $100 loan request:
There's plenty of third party sites like CSFloat, Skinport where you can check the real value of the inventory, that's actually more accurate than Steam price anyway since Steam is always inflated compared to actual sell value. All the skins are tradable, none are trade locked.I'm fine providing more proof if needed, screen recording of the inventory, trade history, or we can go through a trusted middleman too.
Go to sites like CSfloat, Skinport and ask for a loan there. They will surely recognise the value of what you have, and you will get a loan without many problems. You can try selling what you have in the digital goods section, although I think there are much better places to sell CS items than Bitcointalk.
That’s what i was going to suggest to him as well, because he can get around 65% of the Steam value, which is still a good price. I just don’t understand why he doesn"t do that. I"m not sure how he planned to use the skins as collateral, whether he would send the skins as gifts or give the entire steam account. He would need some proof that the steam account actually belongs to him...
32. Post 67173082 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 20:46:13 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Bolji članovi mogu da zahtijevaju i veće isplate. Kampanja plaća unaprijed. Preferiraju da plaćaju USDT preko Tron mreže ali postoji mogućnost za dogovor i za druge kriptovalute. Potrebno je napisati 20 postova tjedno. Nema obaveze pisanja u Gambling forumu niti učesnici moraju pisati svaki dan.
Bas citam, zanimljiva kampanja te sam pristup selekciji. Ne znam samo dal im je pametno davati tih $5 ili $10 bonusa za svaku aplikaciju, jer bi ovi sa vojskom altova mogli navaliti da iskoriste situaciju.
Stake je inace bio prilicno netransparentan kod dodavanja novih clanova. Koliko znam, imaju 2 ili vise threada sa kampanjom, a menadzera makar 5. Sta i ko je tu aktivan, mozda ni oni ne znaju.
Iskreno cisto sumnjam da imaju 5 managera, s ozbirom koliko lose je kampanja vodjena. A jos veca farsa je ono ko fol ocjenjivanje svakog clana pa prema tome odredjivanje koliko postova ce im biti placeno svaki tjedan.
Ako se dobro secam, nekoliko aktivnih ucesnika su i bili pod nekom istragom da je u pitanju farma ili alt accounti. Ne bih bio iznenadjen da je 80% stake kampanje u stvari grupa od 3-5 osoba, koji su bili i menadzeri i ucesnici.
Mislim da situacija opcenito nije puno bolja kad su u pitanju alt accounti i ekipa koja je popusila sig ban. Dam ruku u vatru da je minimalno 50% njih dio neke farme.
33. Post 67171192 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 09:13:01 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Zapravo mu stariji i iskusniji članovi daju dobre savjete u svezi kampanje, da pronađe managera s dobrom reputacijom za kampanju, poveća budget za kampanju, možda se fokusira samo na avatare itd.
No, čini mi se da nije baš voljan slušati druge i da čak misli da čini uslugu zajednici jer je otvorio kampanju junior članovima.
Najbolji savjet koji je dobio je da jednostavno zaključa taj thread
25 slobodnih pozicija u kampanji?
Baš me zanima da li ćemo i kada vidjeti prvu službenu prijavu za vjerojatno najslabije plaćenu kampanju u povijesti ovog foruma.
Eno podigao je na $0,25 isplatu. Cak je i napravio signature kodove i cini se da napreduje.
Meni je razumljivo da mali projekat ima limitiran budzet i d apokusavaju sa malo novca da urade nesto. Mada kazino u tako niskoj razini, nema sta da trazi danas. Ovo je vise hobi, pa mozda nadje jednog-dva istomisljenika.
Moram priznati da sam bio iznenađen da je dobio prvu prijavu za ovu kampanju pa sam baš išao provjeriti tko se to zapravo prijavio.
Jako zanimljiv slučaj, account registriran prije 3 godine, prvo je pisao na bengali jeziku, pa je počeo pisati na talijanskom i kasnije na engleskom.
Još uvijek je junior member, nakon 3 godine na forumu a ako taj lik nije baš neki jezični genijalac da dobro govori 3 tako različita jezika, account je vjerojatno prodan bar jednom.
I mislio sam da ako uopće bude nekih prijava, da će doći sa ovakvih profila.
Možda kojim čudom dobije još neku prijavu ali da će skupiti 25 sudionika kampanje je znanstvena fantastika
34. Post 67171123 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 08:41:13 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :
Perhaps someone knows who was behind this accusation and will ask the user to return.
I think the fastest way is to contact ---->
https://www.reddit.com/user/ryitnoise/@examplens I don't have an old Reddit account, so if you (or anyone else) could help, I would be grateful.
35. Post 67171115 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 08:38:01 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Well-done for the fast response and implementation
Thanks — the shimmer one was an easy fix once enough people flagged it.
Does chain-mode always go through a bridge or cross-chain, or can the swap be performed with liquidity funds directly from your pool reserves?
That's the impression I got, at least for some smaller orders.
Chain always routes through the bridge/cross-chain path — our own reserves are never used there, regardless of order size. Small or large, it's the same route.
When does Dex.fo add new token such as Solana? Wondering here like there is a Solana network here too which is really demand right now because of memecoin trend.
It's planned, but not next. The priority right now is finishing the Fast & White work and the other fixes on the list — once the system is fully dialed in, expanding the coin list is the next step. No dates until we're actually there.
36. Post 67170473 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Wed Sep 23 00:28:25 CEST 2026) in Blink wallet hacked:
They named their wallet before Bitcoin Beach Wallet release in 2020. The rebranding from Bitcoin Beach Wallet to Blink Wallet happened in 2023 at that time, they were only offering a custodial wallet.
Meanwhile, Self-Custodial Accounts feature was pretty new. They released this in update 3.0 this year (June, 2026).
That make sense, i once heard this bitcoin beach wallet before but never interest its service since its made for locals of el salvador if my brain serves me right.
It will be interesting to see the final list at the end of the year, all wallets and services that have been compromised. I think this is a record year.
Many blame the development of AI and the new possibilities it has brought. However, we can safely say that we are only at the beginning of development and what awaits us in the coming period.
Yes, with simple google and gemini response there are already 224 hacked incident happened, as for the amount, i never calculate it since it there are lots of them. And yes, this is a record breaking of incidents while the amount of previous years are higher compare this year.
37. Post 67169362 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Tue Sep 22 19:14:19 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Why is it called Fast & White? The Q&A section only explains the Fast part.
Let me also add my voice saying that I think you should add a tooltip on top of the box saying "it is disabled for now" instead of letting the user guess.
Also it would be best if you added the option to switch the webpage's theme.
I'm not sure if it was with dex.fo exchange, but White was an additional option with Fast mode, where the user can request on clean and low-AML-score coins.
On the name: White isn't a separate option you request, it's the same Fast mode. It describes where the coins come from — in Fast & White, payouts are made from our own reserves, so the coins are fully exchange-sourced, with no bridge or routing trail. That's the difference from Chain mode.
On the tooltip: we don't plan to add one. When the mode is paused, the card is greyed out and can't be selected, and with the shimmer removed the inactive state is clear on its own.
On the theme switch: thanks for the suggestion, but we don't plan to add it.
38. Post 67169285 (unedited backup) (by MoBitExchange) (scraped on Tue Sep 22 18:50:07 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :
I'm not sure, but does Monerica ever remove feedback?
I even think that it would be wrong in this case.
It can be seen from the whole situation that the user wrote negative feedback impatiently, already after two hours. The problem was resolved, but the Mobit team did not follow the discussion and responded 20 days later. Therefore, they did not solve the case just to remove bad feedback, but it was solved by a regular procedure.
I think that the whole situation is more useful for Mobit, than if someone wrote "great exchange, everything went smoothly". I would rather pay attention to this kind of feedback than any other.
The problem is that Monerica is rather slow to respond to status change requests. The user who posted the complaint didn't bother to come back and report that the issue had been resolved.
Furthermore, orders are automatically deleted after a certain period; even though we signed the PGP message and marked the order as "resolved," it no longer appears because it was automatically removed. So, we definitely need the community's help to report this.
Perhaps someone knows who was behind this accusation and will ask the user to return.
39. Post 67169067 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Tue Sep 22 17:42:49 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
~
Meni ta kampanja izgleda kao da je vlasnik projekta čuo da se crypto projekti reklamiraju na forumu u obliku signature kampanje, ali ne da mu se davati puno novaca na kampanju pa onda još i plaćati nekog menadžera s reputacijom da mu to vodi. Jednostavnije mu je plaćati 10 centi (!!!) po postu i sam sve voditi. Jer kao da je problem na kraju svakog tjedna prebrojati postoje koje su članovi kampanje napisali... Vjerojatno mu je čudno da ekipa plaća menadžere koji "samo broje postove" na kraju svakog tjedna.
Po meni, ova kampanja će relativno brzo završiti u Meti.
Covjek je probao da vidi da li ide. S obzirom da mu se jos uvijek jitko jije prijavio za kampanju mozda je izvukao pouku i prilagodi svoj pristup. Zanimljivo od svih kampanja u services dijelu je vidio bas BitList pa je prilagodio isplatu prema toj kampanji, jos je stavio skoro triput manju cijenu jer trazi juniore
U svakom slucaju ako casino nema love za kampanju barem od par tjedana, vjerojatno bi zezao i oko vecih isplata ukoliko netko ima srece u kockanju.
U neku ruku vec je skrenuo paznju na sebe. Drzi se onog; I losa reklama je ipak reklama.
Ali mora mu se oprostiti, poredi to svoje sa bitlist, ocigledno ne poznaje dovoljno prilike na forumu, pa ne zna da je bitlist kampanja prilika za nesto drugo.
Inace, sa trenutnom akcijom banovanja signature, bas me interesuje koliko je ovo primamljivo cak i spam farmerima.
Zapravo mu stariji i iskusniji članovi daju dobre savjete u svezi kampanje, da pronađe managera s dobrom reputacijom za kampanju, poveća budget za kampanju, možda se fokusira samo na avatare itd.
No, čini mi se da nije baš voljan slušati druge i da čak misli da čini uslugu zajednici jer je otvorio kampanju junior članovima.
Najbolji savjet koji je dobio je da jednostavno zaključa taj thread
25 slobodnih pozicija u kampanji?
Baš me zanima da li ćemo i kada vidjeti prvu službenu prijavu za vjerojatno najslabije plaćenu kampanju u povijesti ovog foruma.