Last update: 2025-11-12_Wed_15.30h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66039212 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 15:24:31 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:
From what I see now on the Bridgoro platform, 1 BRGX = 1 USD. Is that the correct rate?
Also, if the BRGX token is only and exclusively for internal use, I assume that this means that its rate will not change, because it will not be exposed to external influence and pump/dump risk?
Correct.
btw. What exactly is the reason for this update, and setting the minimum exchange amount to $60
Exchange Features
Minimum exchange amount: ~$60 (USD equivalent)[UPDATED]
The reason is related to the Dead Wallet Amount. If the price of crypto assets drops significantly, as it did on October 10, funds may get stuck because the remaining balance might be lower than the required network fee. During such price fluctuations, network fees can rise sharply, making small amounts effectively unspendable.
2. Post 66039046 (unedited backup) (by MotoLM) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 14:39:20 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Is there anybody else experiencing a painfully slow loading time when trying to access the sportsbook section?
My internet is pretty good right now, and I have tried through different browsers, but the part where the games and the odds are supposed to be displaced is just blank.
I just checked it now to see. Loading the main page and logging in is fast. So is navigating the home page. When I click on the sports section, it does slow down a bit. For a few seconds I only see the blue background before the page loads and displays content. It's not painfully slow on my end but it could be faster. It's not the first sportsbook that I have seen that is a bit slower, though, considering the amount of events and how much information is available on-page.
I just wanted to confirm the same thing based on my experience with Betpanda yesterday. I just checked, and it seems to be working within normal limits for the site's loading speed (sportsbet section). Maybe they improved something in the meantime.

Of course, it would be desirable if the site would speed up a bit, but it seems to me that it is currently common what we see on all similar platforms. Some are even significantly slower to load.
betpandacasino.io is their official mirror. You can try out the site when the main has issues.
3. Post 66038697 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 12:50:19 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:
Hi Bitcointalkers,We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to this community for being the very first to support us from the very beginning.
It's truly inspiring to see how the Bitcointalk community has stepped up to help our project, something we deeply value and respect.
As many of you know, our project is fully self-funded, so we don't have a large marketing budget.
Yet, thanks to the dedication and efforts of some of our community members, we have been able to bring more attention to what we are building.
We strongly believe that every contribution deserves recognition and reward.
We are confident that our project will achieve success sooner or later and when that happens, we will make sure to show our appreciation properly.
Believe us, the rewards won't just be a few hundred dollars. We have already created a list of those who have supported us and saved their contact information for future communication.
We would especially like to thank one of our community members [
examplens ] for his exceptional help. While we faced multiple bans trying to access Reddit, he managed to post and maintain our
Bridgoro subreddit there, as well as on
Altcoinstalks, which has been a huge help for our visibility.
This message carries no hidden meaning, we simply wanted to express our gratitude and confirm in writing that your support won't be forgotten.
Thank you, Bitcointalk, for being with us from the start.
I will check it out and search for any potential mistakes in document.
Whitepaper is usually made for coins, but there is nothing wrong in having whitepaper made for exchange.
That would be great. We are still new to this, so we would really appreciate any suggestions you have regarding the Whitepaper.
PS
Good luck with upcoming new Beta Test starting in few days, I think it should start in 4 days.
Just try not to write anything controversial on Telegram this time

Yeah, that small mistake happened because of crunch time. We published the post on November 10 and accidentally mentioned 4 days instead of 5 before the Beta launch. It's already fixed in our post.
The exchange will also issue an in-app token called BRGX. These BRGX tokens will be used as rewards for users who participate in specific tasks and reach certain achievements.
The whitepaper doesn't go into specifics about what kind of tasks there will be. It does mention that there will be easy ones like clicking a claim button and repeatable daily, weekly, monthly, and custom activities. BRGX tokens will also be used as referral rewards for inviting new users to the exchange.
Thanks a lot for pointing that out. We will update the Whitepaper soon with more details about the internal token and clearly explain the task structure and differences.
Just to clarify your question about the token:BRGX is purely an in-app token used inside the Bridgoro platform. It's not a blockchain-based crypto token, it exists only within the exchange environment and serves as a reward unit for:
- completing tasks
- inviting new users (referral rewards)
- and earning commissions for creating sell offers (after the fee-free period ends)
BRGX can only be used within the Bridgoro exchange and can be withdrawn exclusively inside the Bridgoro exchange.
4. Post 66035285 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 14:52:02 CET 2025) in JollyGood English Premier League Season: 2020/2021:
Yes,Slot will not be fired from his job as the manager of Liverpool because he has achieved something that is last season but will be under pressure next season. Slot spent huge during the last transfer window and with that kind of spending, the Liverpool owners expect results this season or next season. Although the season is still fresh but the daggers will be out next season.
I am fairly confident Slot will not be sacked this season. His contract expires at the end of the 2027 season therefore there is time, he could even sign a contract extension if results improve.
Everyone immediately starts an argument about how much was spent, and it very rarely happens that investing a lot of money does not bring results in the short term. PSG is perhaps the best example of this.
As for Liverpool, it is more striking that everything seems incompatible. It seems that they bought players whose characteristics are not what the team needed, now it looks quite uncontrolled. I think that Slot does not have the capacity to do what is required of him on paper. These wins against Real are especially symptomatic, which leads him to believe that he has solved the problem, and it is enough for his team to go on the field.
They beat Real Madrid but lose to Manchester City. I think Liverpool did not accept that (as Premier League champions) all the teams will be fighting against them in a more determined manner than last season. Time could prove me wrong but at the moment it seems as though Slot did not recruit well.
Of the recent purchases, Ekitike seems to a player that looks fantastic on the ball. Watching any player, especially a striker running at players and getting past them to create a chance is very exciting. The Isak saga that eventually brought him to Liverpool for Ł125 million did not help either.
5. Post 66034603 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 11:16:44 CET 2025) in 🔄 Changeum.io - Lightning-Fast Instant Crypto Exchange | No KYC:
Hello, we currently don't have KYC checks and we guarantee refunds for now. However, I can't speak for the future; if any changes occur, all users will be notified in advance. Currently, we only have AML verification for all transactions. Liquidity is replenished with our own funds.
Does this mean that every incoming transaction is checked by AML, and in the case of too many risky coins, you must return the coin to the sender?
AML score is a necessary evil and in the end, we have to accept it. Here is a very specific case, which could be a warning to you about accepting coins with a bad AML score
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563782.0Interesting situation
(how did I miss it?), it happens with platforms that have a limited reserve of coins. I will test Changeum.io to see the source of the coins and whether they use income inputs directly in other transactions or not.
Very interesting.
AML checks are indeed here to stay. Although this situation involves only altcoins, I see lots of people talking about bitcoin fungibility when
sending coins to exchanges. But I never see such situation when the user receives coins from exchanges... Fungibility means nothing in this situation...
I guess all this idea of fungibility really doesn't apply to stolen funds, specially when we are dealing with altcoins. Actually, fungibility is already questionable even for bitcoin. AML checks are here to stay.
6. Post 66033949 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 06:36:49 CET 2025) in 🔄 Changeum.io - Lightning-Fast Instant Crypto Exchange | No KYC:
Hello, we currently don't have KYC checks and we guarantee refunds for now. However, I can't speak for the future; if any changes occur, all users will be notified in advance. Currently, we only have AML verification for all transactions. Liquidity is replenished with our own funds.
Does this mean that every incoming transaction is checked by AML, and in the case of too many risky coins, you must return the coin to the sender?
AML score is a necessary evil and in the end, we have to accept it. Here is a very specific case, which could be a warning to you about accepting coins with a bad AML score
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563782.0Interesting situation
(how did I miss it?), it happens with platforms that have a limited reserve of coins. I will test Changeum.io to see the source of the coins and whether they use income inputs directly in other transactions or not.
7. Post 66033181 (unedited backup) (by Zoomic) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 23:11:44 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
They are called Head Lines and you can find them on the left side of the soccer icon.
Headlines under sports betting exactly.
Is this something new on Betpanda? Or maybe I just haven't been paying attention until now.
Currently, there is only Tesla stuff. I assume that there will be an upgrade here and more diverse options.
Could it be that Tesla bought the head line space to publish news only related to them. It sounds funny, but Betpanda can still sell out such space for strategic advertisement by pushing only the positive news about the project.
Well, let's just believe that those Tesla news are just placeholder news, diverse news will be punished there in due time.
8. Post 66032816 (unedited backup) (by Wiwo) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 21:42:14 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.
Not just you mate, but the reality is that we are all heading towards centralization and just like bitcoin adoptions via central authorities in form of ETFs positions in bitcoin have drive us towards centralization if not now but in the near future we all be beating good bye to decentralization.
Cryptocurrency casinos have taken the same direction since the need to meet licensing requirements have put them in a position that mandated them to take verification documents from their customers in form of kyc.
9. Post 66032787 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 21:35:13 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
~
It's not only you Examplens... at first I thought it had something with fiat, but after reading other comments I thought there's something more, and then I saw your comment. When they grow big enough, they need to adopt...
As I understood, Sportsbet will go fully legit... so they will accept crypto if all the laws & regulations allow it. I've read quite a few articles about that stuff... long story short, it says that all big players (casinos & other crypto platforms) are under serious pressure. The YOLO team decided to go fully legal, while some other casinos chose a different way...
In any case, it wouldn't surprise me if BC ends up becoming a crypto casino with mandatory KYC.
Unfortunately the way the trend is right now, the players who don't want to submit personal information for KYC will have to play only on casinos without licence with high probability of rigged games.
Sadly that is trend in whole world and not just in gambling industry.
10. Post 66032735 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 21:16:25 CET 2025) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:
~
evo i tag; ovcijisir, katanic97, dkbit98, Rikafip

Hvala ti na tagu Examplens, na zalost ovaj put nisam se uspio prijaviti na vrijeme, ali jako cijenim dobru namjeru

11. Post 66032484 (unedited backup) (by iv4n) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 19:58:55 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
~
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.
I agree that something funny is going on, as I had two KYC requests in last few months - one from bc.game and other from sportsbet.io.
Also in mean time sportsbet made decision to cease operations involving crypto due to regulations.
It seems that from one side big corporations invest in crypto, and from other side regular users are victims of regulations and potential privacy issues.
It's not only you Examplens... at first I thought it had something with fiat, but after reading other comments I thought there's something more, and then I saw your comment. When they grow big enough, they need to adopt...
As I understood, Sportsbet will go fully legit... so they will accept crypto if all the laws & regulations allow it. I've read quite a few articles about that stuff... long story short, it says that all big players (casinos & other crypto platforms) are under serious pressure. The YOLO team decided to go fully legal, while some other casinos chose a different way...
In any case, it wouldn't surprise me if BC ends up becoming a crypto casino with mandatory KYC.
12. Post 66031996 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 17:57:32 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
~
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.
I agree that something funny is going on, as I had two KYC requests in last few months - one from bc.game and other from sportsbet.io.
Also in mean time sportsbet made decision to cease operations involving crypto due to regulations.
It seems that from one side big corporations invest in crypto, and from other side regular users are victims of regulations and potential privacy issues.
13. Post 66031849 (unedited backup) (by azlandar4116) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 17:25:13 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
I am not sure that the only reason why KYC is triggered is only because withdrawal is in fiat.
I say that because one week ago I tried to make crypto withdrawal in TON in equivalent of 20 USD and somehow it triggered KYC.
I have used BC.game for years and until one week ago they never asked for KYC. I can't figure out what triggered it, because I didn't have any unusual activity lately and the amount was pretty small.
Well most of the users are being asked for KYC these days. I don't think it has anything to do with unusual activity, and no casino site will trigger a manual KYC check on such small withdrawals. I guess there is some random KYC checking and you account comes into that random checking and asking for the KYC.
I guess it makes sense if it was just random and not triggered by some action. I also don't know if they changed their KYC policies lately, I haven't got any notification on e-mail but it could also be one of possible reasons.
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.
Dear members of this forum i request everyone not use bc game especially in india they are doing scams thousands of players are begging for their own money you can see spams full of withdrawal and deposit issue on discord , trustpoilt even any one need personally proof he/she can quote me here i will provide them proof how shamelessly they are doing scams ,i boycott bc gam
14. Post 66031781 (unedited backup) (by Little Mouse) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 17:09:13 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Is this something new on Betpanda? Or maybe I just haven't been paying attention until now.
I have never been paying attention to this but I guess this icon was there all the time lol.
15. Post 66030866 (unedited backup) (by Haunebu) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 13:42:56 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.
It's not just you and It's pretty much the standard already these days sadly. World governments kept applying pressure on various crypto gambling sites due to which almost all of them have become KYC hungry in recent times.
BC.Game is one of the hungriest among them thanks to which their unethical tactics are visible to everyone. They aren't scammers, but they will use KYC as a tool to halt withdrawals unethically whenever they feel like it.
16. Post 66029482 (unedited backup) (by REDice) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 06:38:32 CET 2025) in Loan needed, domain as collateral - Advise needed:
what advice for me i had a web3 staking platform for collateral? token i had. this valid for collateral?
No.
When a lender lends money, he does not want to buy someone's business. He borrows money to get interest + his money back at the end of the agreement. If the lender can't sell your platform easily and cover the entire deal, the main amount + interest, they won't consider it as collateral.
Even if the platform is profitable, you certainly wouldn't get anywhere near the amount you think it's worth.
Otherwise, people would massively create similar platforms and tokens and sell them in this way.
what rank need to qualify to get loan here? i see most here is legenday to to qualify? JR. member not ?
17. Post 66028399 (unedited backup) (by OrangeFren) (scraped on Sun Nov 9 22:14:19 CET 2025) in OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison:
Unfortunately, here is a much more serious case related to another partner, Exolix. It is about $11k taken, where Exolix admitted his guilt.
I don't know how your guarantee system works, but it would be good if you could influence this to be resolved positively.
EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED — $11,000Sorry for the delay. Was busy doing the WizardSwap meetup in Gibraltar. We even paid using Lightning! See video:
https://x.com/OrangeFren/status/1986867927694328175I got in touch with Exolix, the confirmed to us that this user was not one of our own so our guarantee doesn't apply. That said, if a similar situation happened to one of our users I strongly suspect we would apply the insurance. After all Exolix is fully at fault here (they even say so themselves!).
18. Post 66027096 (unedited backup) (by iv4n) (scraped on Sun Nov 9 16:26:19 CET 2025) in Српски (Serbian):
Definitivno je dosegnut zenit sa ovim meme tokenima i ako je neko i sumnjao, ovakve stvari su signali da je alt sezona gotova i lagano ide ka ciscenju racuna.
Aca Lukas ima svoj $LUKAS token (neverovatno mi je da ovo uopste pisem) i njegovo objasnjavanje je prava slika sta predstvaljaju ove stvari.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQrMtXoiF48/?igsh=aXgwMms0ejA0dXllAca je rekao da ima tu prevara, ali on to nece da radi i nece nigde da bezi... nema gde, mora da peva. "Prakticno on investira vo bezbedna rabota", rekao Boki 13. Isti taj je 30 sekundi pre toga reako: "Jebes me na suvo ako ista razumem". Kakav razgovor "na nivou", sto bi rekao Zika Pavlovic.
Evo i nije lose, zar ne?

Pa to je odlicna cena... cak je i malo jaci od dinara. Ali valjda je poenta da svaki njegov fan za 1k dinara moze da kupi cak hiljadu tokena covece.
Naravno da sam morao da pogledam sajt... sta su oni sve napisali tamo.


Ali ne lezi vraže, gos'n Lukas na sajtu ima da prodaje i T-SHIRTS i JACKETS i HOODIES tako ukoliko ne kupiš token možeš da se obučeš

A za koju godinu kad bude video kako posao ide ima da brendira i svoje lonce i poklopce kao i namestaj naravno.
Mislim da su mnogo zanimljiviji slotovi & ruleti koji dolaze uskoro.
19. Post 66026386 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Sun Nov 9 12:20:37 CET 2025) in Talksearch.io - Advanced Bitcointalk Search Engine:
I used TalkSearch a little, I would suggest two improvements if possible. It is related to the search result.
For example, what I miss is the sorting of search results by creation date and by the date of the last post in the topic. I'm not sure how the algorithm decides the order of the prints, but it seems that they are thrown randomly.
Also, if possible, separate or at least mark archived or locked threads. It took me a long time to search and check each link, and many were just archived or locked, which was useless to me.
I hope to finally add vector embedding search within the next few days. It would require a complete re-index though since I have to add new fields.
Also the second request might be a good idea. I return the entire post data to the frontend anyway so it would be possible to do such a thing.
20. Post 66022549 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 13:12:20 CET 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (55) 13696 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 203:
HostFat (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 300 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 9019 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 30747:
Vod (
Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2340 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4230 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1721 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2662 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 9748 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4368 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 2395 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 3191 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2456 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (1) 8727 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 5856 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 8217 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 113670:
Mitchell (
Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 1607 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1599 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 5931 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (11) 6312 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (36) 1836 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 189967:
buckrogers (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2141 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2566 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 12272 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 5928 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 6510 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 6424 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 3128 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 9176 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 672 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 4018 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3435 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 11009 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 11116 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2286 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 4078 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (61) 19273 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 6170 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2832 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 8407 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 698159:
Jet Cash (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2037 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 1310 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3776 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 811213:
polymerbit (
Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 958 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 440 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1452 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3538 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1086 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3225 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1234 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 986781:
imhoneer (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (3) 1349 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6316 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +92 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 3987 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 1760 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 2114 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (2) 1906 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 5103 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4229 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 14771 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2099 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3061 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (34) 11015 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1288 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2145 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1949 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 8933 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1291828:
TheBeardedBaby (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 3304 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2382 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1339716:
coinlocket$ (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 1511 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3056 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 7026 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 11203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1825672:
morvillz7z (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2197 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 3144 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 19267 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2237 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 2389 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 5003 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 5130 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1470 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 3158 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 1832 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 793 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2597426:
efialtis (
Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1102 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5263 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 7378 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1705 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 9073 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1501 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 8849 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1126 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 2865 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3486361:
PowerGlove (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6590 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 3506304:
God Of Thunder (
Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1340 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (
8033 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
828 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
34 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
141 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3318:
Luke-Jr (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
191 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
334 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. Post 66022301 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 11:38:50 CET 2025) in Jobs that pay with $btc:
But to me it doesn't make sense to pay a salary in Bitcoin when evaluate the value in stablecoins or fiat. Though this considers Bitcoin adoption, it doesn't mean the receiver will hold that Bitcoin.
Imagine how much more complicated it would be to pay without Bitcoin.
Would signature campaigns as such appeal at all if there were only fiat payment?
Also, holding is not the most important thing in Bitcoin adoption, it's more about flow and transfer between different entities.
Due to volatility, the receiver would lose the value of Bitcoin unless he held it. So he/she is obliged to sell his/her Bitcoin to cover the family expenses. So Bitcoin payment isn't very useful for him.
Due to volatility, the value of the transaction is agreed in fiat, and Bitcoin is only used for easier transfer. Just as a user can lose by holding Bitcoin, they can also profit from its value increasing.
I received weekly payouts in bitcoin since 2018. I can see it is really amazing, and the volatility is not a problem at all. And I have hold most of what I received so far, and I have spent about 20-30% of it only (in bull markets ofc)
I have received literally thousands and thousands dollars in BTC in this forum and in other places in the internet (as a blog writer, as a developer, as a bounty hunter, etc) and I always received money in btc. I can simple say it is amazing, and the volatility is not a problem, neither having to evaluate the value in fiat. This simple doesn`t matter.
Bitcoin is an amazing payment method.
22. Post 66021555 (unedited backup) (by Skjadoon) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 06:19:01 CET 2025) in EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED:
It has been several weeks with no result, and it seems like Exolix is not taking much care. I am unsure what steps to take next.

How did you get to Exolix? Direct link or through an intermediary aggregator?
Exolix is listed on the Orangefren.com aggregator, and as far as I can see, there is some sort of warranty for Exolix with OF. I know that previously this guarantee applied to orders created only through Orangefren, but I would certainly ask for mediation from them or at least advice on what to do next. They are very customer-oriented, and I believe they will do their best.
Here is also their ANN
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409616.0https://talkimg.com/images/2025/11/06/U6jsQD.pngDelisting from Orangefren could cost them more than $11k in the long run.
It seems like OrangeFren doesn’t care if you don’t use their affiliate links. It’s been almost months, and the money is gone with no help or support. I don’t understand how everyone is so calm reading about stolen funds it’s someone else’s money that’s been taken.
Honestly, it feels like this community also doesn’t care at all.
23. Post 66021030 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 00:31:50 CET 2025) in Српски (Serbian):
Definitivno je dosegnut zenit sa ovim meme tokenima i ako je neko i sumnjao, ovakve stvari su signali da je alt sezona gotova i lagano ide ka ciscenju racuna.
Aca Lukas ima svoj $LUKAS token (neverovatno mi je da ovo uopste pisem) i njegovo objasnjavanje je prava slika sta predstvaljaju ove stvari.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQrMtXoiF48/?igsh=aXgwMms0ejA0dXllhahahaha sto je najgore ja sam ovo video pre mozda mesec dana i mislio sam da je neka zajebancija,kad ono lik ladno ima token. Kako mu se smeje ovaj Boki dok ga slusa,a ovaj nema tri cuke o tome sto prica. Vidi se da je ozbiljno zaglibio,ali sta drugo ocekivato od ćacija
24. Post 66020684 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 23:03:02 CET 2025) in [Web] BitcoinTalk notification bot (mentions and merits) - no app required:
Is there any possibility to follow a certain phrase, but only if it is written in the subject? I want to follow every discussion opened on a specific topic, following a phrase in the body of the message brings me too many unnecessary results.
I didn't find anything similar in the Telegram bot.
I'm very short in time at the moment, but I'll implement that in the next weeks.

25. Post 66019312 (unedited backup) (by mvdheuvel1983) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 16:49:49 CET 2025) in Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021:
If I am an Arsenal fan and they repeat what they did in previous seasons again this season, I will decamp from being an Arsenal fan. That's, if they're topping the league till almost the end of season without winning the title. It's been a long time since Arsenal lifted up the title, that should motivate them to do better this season.
Things don't quite go that way. If you are a fan of a club, then you should be a fan even when things are not going well. It is a process, and no club can be the best forever, always, and everywhere.
I assume that you would have been a Liverpool fan last season and a Manchester City fan the previous season.
Loyal fans will keep supporting their team when they are doing well and when they are going through a difficult moment that is what makes you a good fan if all the supporters of Arsenal were not loyal to the team you will not see them keep supporting Arsenal after they have been going back and forth in the league without achieving anything. When things are not going well in your team that should be the best time you show them love and support as a good fan cause every team will go through that process if you don't support your team that means you will keep changing teams each season.
26. Post 66019253 (unedited backup) (by reagansimms) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 16:35:07 CET 2025) in Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021:
If I am an Arsenal fan and they repeat what they did in previous seasons again this season, I will decamp from being an Arsenal fan. That's, if they're topping the league till almost the end of season without winning the title. It's been a long time since Arsenal lifted up the title, that should motivate them to do better this season.
Things don't quite go that way. If you are a fan of a club, then you should be a fan even when things are not going well. It is a process, and no club can be the best forever, always, and everywhere.
I assume that you would have been a Liverpool fan last season and a Manchester City fan the previous season.
Agreed, after all, when someone decides to become a fan of a club there is always a push for various reasons, which then leads to a strong emotional bond. True fans will certainly support their team no matter what the circumstances, it is not surprising that small clubs in the EPL and other leagues always have loyal fans or even those who are called hardcore fans.
Arsenal are on their way to the title, and fans are delighted to see their team on a positive path. The expectations are very high, maybe they will party for 7 days straight if Arsenal manages to win the EPL trophy, but if it is the opposite, disappointment will certainly be there, but they will not lie to themselves to be fans of another team that has been a rival of the team they have loved so much.
27. Post 66019057 (unedited backup) (by Mame89) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 15:37:13 CET 2025) in Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021:
If I am an Arsenal fan and they repeat what they did in previous seasons again this season, I will decamp from being an Arsenal fan. That's, if they're topping the league till almost the end of season without winning the title. It's been a long time since Arsenal lifted up the title, that should motivate them to do better this season.
Things don't quite go that way. If you are a fan of a club, then you should be a fan even when things are not going well. It is a process, and no club can be the best forever, always, and everywhere.
I assume that you would have been a Liverpool fan last season and a Manchester City fan the previous season.
Lol. So when the team you support fails to win the title, you support another team. This isn't true support, because true supporters will support their team in any situation, whether it's in the worst or the best.
Arsenal has indeed tested the patience of its fans in recent years, consistently performing well at the start of the season, but their performance declines as the season draws to a close. We can understand why Arsenal fans are disappointed, but that doesn't mean they'll switch their support to another club.
But looking at Arsenal's current form they are highly likely to win a trophy this season. This can be seen from their current performances, not only in their consistency but also in the more mature Arsenal squad this season, especially in terms of mentality. So I'm optimistic that Arteta won't repeat the mistakes of last season that led to their trophy failure.
28. Post 66018958 (unedited backup) (by jems) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 15:06:49 CET 2025) in Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021:
If I am an Arsenal fan and they repeat what they did in previous seasons again this season, I will decamp from being an Arsenal fan. That's, if they're topping the league till almost the end of season without winning the title. It's been a long time since Arsenal lifted up the title, that should motivate them to do better this season.
Things don't quite go that way. If you are a fan of a club, then you should be a fan even when things are not going well. It is a process, and no club can be the best forever, always, and everywhere.
I assume that you would have been a Liverpool fan last season and a Manchester City fan the previous season.
If the bet is solely based on Arsenal's end-of-season performance, that person is clearly just a FOMO fan, not a true fan, so it's no surprise that someone would say that. As far as I know no matter how bad their favorite team's performance, a fan will always be there for them, not just in good times but also in bad.
If you've always been an Arsenal fan, I don't think it would have affected you in any way, However disappointment is normal, All football fans feel this way, even though some teams have been in a slump in recent seasons but no fan has gone too far to change their minds.
We should just look at and support realistically, Expectations at the end of the season are certainly natural, In fact not only Arsenal fans but also fans of other top Premier League teams are still hoping their teams can win the Premier League title this season, However I believe anything is still possible because the season is still very long, so it's too early to say which team can win the title.
29. Post 66018731 (unedited backup) (by bitLeap) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 14:06:01 CET 2025) in Premier League Prediction Thread 2020/2021:
If I am an Arsenal fan and they repeat what they did in previous seasons again this season, I will decamp from being an Arsenal fan. That's, if they're topping the league till almost the end of season without winning the title. It's been a long time since Arsenal lifted up the title, that should motivate them to do better this season.
Things don't quite go that way. If you are a fan of a club, then you should be a fan even when things are not going well. It is a process, and no club can be the best forever, always, and everywhere.
I assume that you would have been a Liverpool fan last season and a Manchester City fan the previous season.
If the bet is solely based on Arsenal's end-of-season performance, that person is clearly just a FOMO fan, not a true fan, so it's no surprise that someone would say that. As far as I know no matter how bad their favorite team's performance, a fan will always be there for them, not just in good times but also in bad.
30. Post 66017184 (unedited backup) (by Darker45) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 02:31:44 CET 2025) in TRUSTED MIDDLEMAN WITH MERIT NEEDED:
Judging by you're post history, you're dealing with old ethereum wallets and funded credit cards. These trades have risks that no escrow can protect you from.
Based on his post history, it doesn't seem to me that he is looking for escrow here at all. He probably needs a trusted & aged account to add authority to some kind of offer or scheme. The fact that he included merit as a condition in this case only shows that he does not know this forum very well.
But he/she also mentioned about willingness to use "a trusted middleman or escrow" for his/her transactions. I'm with your suspicion, though. OP is probably looking for a reputable account for something else, probably to appear credible, to give more weight to offers.
Including merit as a condition shows OP knows how things work here very well. Although I don't necessarily agree, merit is probably perceived as the new measurement of reputation, at least more than rank, length of stay, activity, even trust.
Anyway, I hope you aren't a scammer, OP. But if you want to deal with the real account owners, I suggest you communicate with them here and not on Telegram. You might end up dealing with an impersonator.
31. Post 66016907 (unedited backup) (by Kavelj22) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 00:05:43 CET 2025) in Lizex.io – Your Gateway to Safe and Fast Swaps:
A minimum of $100 deposit then write a review to receive only $5 without counting the deducted fee of the swap and network transaction fee that may exceed the $5 value reward.
If There are no hidden fees; the minimum fee you pay will be around $1.50, so the review price isn't bad, but it's discouraging. $10 would be better.
$5 is the usual incentive for leaving feedback on rating platforms. $10 could perhaps be considered as buying positive reviews, which is probably against the rules of rating sites like antiswap.io (by the way, which is currently offline)
If it's against the policy rules of rating sites like antiswap, then it should't be acceptable to pay users any amount of money whatever timy that might be. The platform should lunch a review campaign to get honest feedbacks directly from community but not to design a rating page in a rating platform. The review campaign here in the forum should be quite enough to reach the intended results. Posting in rating platforms should be voluntarily.
32. Post 66016763 (unedited backup) (by Mallampue) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 23:23:25 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
Winning some free money to bet with is always good; at least I won't feel so guilty if I lose it.
The safest way to gamble is not to gamble with your own money

"feel so guilty", Interesting approach to the problem. I'm usually mad at myself for losing. Even if it's after a solid win or because of some irrational playing, everything can annoy me quite a bit. It's a good thing that I then leave everything until I cool down completely, which probably saved me from bigger losses.
But we need capital to gamble, and that capital is our own money. If there a bonus from the casino or if we win a certain event, we certainly won't be afraid to bet because whether we win or lose, we won't be disappointed. But most of the time, we have to take money out of our wallets and make deposits. Sometimes, We don't know whether we'll win or lose, because there only one hope, which is luck.
I think if they were out there winning big, they certainly wouldn't be afraid to gamble because they have a substantial capital from previous wins. However, if we lose consecutively, We certainly feel regret. So if we're not mentally strong, our days will be plagued by disappointment from wasting money on gambling.
33. Post 66016600 (unedited backup) (by Taskford) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 22:47:07 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
Winning some free money to bet with is always good; at least I won't feel so guilty if I lose it.
The safest way to gamble is not to gamble with your own money

"feel so guilty", Interesting approach to the problem. I'm usually mad at myself for losing. Even if it's after a solid win or because of some irrational playing, everything can annoy me quite a bit. It's a good thing that I then leave everything until I cool down completely, which probably saved me from bigger losses.
That's right and if we can take advantage on those promotion or free money that they give then why not right? Maybe if we got lucky we can pull some great gains later on.
Also its normal to have that kind of reaction especially if we exceed on our limitation since we provably think about after the game that we should not do all those bad decision we made since it cost us lots of money.
That's why I make sure to bet what can I afford to lose to avoid having those regrets and make sure not to lose huge each time I play.
34. Post 66014980 (unedited backup) (by @Whale) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 15:27:31 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
I agree with what Lakai01 says. You abruptly stopped all activities here. I understand that it is necessary to do an evaluation and look at the effects of the promotion here on the forum, but if you plan a long-term presence in crypto gambling, at least the basic activity is desirable.
If the problem persists, please note that the navigation bar in this thread (post 1) contains links to official mirrors!
We're still here! Yes, we stopped the campaign and several other things at the same time and for the same reason as some of the most famous casinos here. But we're still here, and we'll even be adding some raffles soon.
A few moments ago i was having some problems reaching the site, some 500 internal error was displayed, i was the only one having the issue? Now seems like its working again.
If the problem persists, please note that the navigation bar in this thread (post 1) contains links to official mirrors!

35. Post 66014717 (unedited backup) (by albon) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 14:11:19 CET 2025) in Fake Paid Reviews on Trustpilot – Beware of @247workonly:
I spent many years on this forum, and there were always offers to buy fake reviews. I am sure that there are currently other similar active services on the forum. Some attract attention, some don't.. We cannot deal with this because it is not only on the Bitcointalk forum, and it is a general problem on all similar platforms like Trustpilot, Google reviews, etc...
The only two options we have here are zero tolerance (it worked with mixers), or deleting all such posts or leaving them as is.
What I see is that we should do whatever we can and save what we can saved instead of ignoring their topics. Tagging the account and reporting the service provider's topic would be among the appropriate actions, but it is not a final solution. However, it reduces the spread of the problem, so that the forum does not become crowded with such services that cause harm to investors and buyers alike.. These services, by their very nature, violate the forum's rules because they promote fake reviews that may be used for fraud, as they use them to build a false reputation for fraudulent services and platforms. So, our duty is for all of us to cooperate together whenever we find any new service that could cause harm to others.
Even 10 negative tags mean nothing here. A newbie account with 4 posts is insignificant, and it takes very little time to create a new one like that. Someone who decided to buy reviews from him, the negative tag will certainly not deter him from doing so.
You could also leave that user a negative feedback. The bottom line is that it would be useless because of their rank, they'll just create as many accounts as possible and continue doing what they are doing.
Alright, even if they create new accounts, we'll keep repeating the same measures until they give up and stay away from the community.. They will not last long against a large community of vigilant members. However, we must fulfill our duty to warn others and not leave a scammer among us without alerting them, documenting evidence and officially reporting them to the administration/Mods. Those who ignore our warnings will ultimately bear the responsibility.
36. Post 66014598 (unedited backup) (by Charles-Tim) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 13:39:55 CET 2025) in Fake Paid Reviews on Trustpilot – Beware of @247workonly:
Even 10 negative tags mean nothing here. A newbie account with 4 posts is insignificant, and it takes very little time to create a new one like that. Someone who decided to buy reviews from him, the negative tag will certainly not deter him from doing so.
I later decided not to give him a negative feedback because he posted he will do the review before he will receive payment. I hope that will not change. But regardless if the feedback will not have any effects, I will still prefer to also give him or her a neutral feedback about how wrong is service is by deceiving the world with fake feedbacks.
37. Post 66013805 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 09:06:02 CET 2025) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:
Sada sam probao sa dva razlicita VPN servisa i nemam problem sa otvaranjem.
Ono sto je mozda slucaj kod tebe, ako koristis neki od popup blokera, pa stranica ne otvara prvi screen. U pitanju je cookie prozor, ono gde odobravas koje prihvatas, a koje odbijas.
Koristim ad blocker ali pojavio mi se je prozorčić sa cookijima. Sve sam ih odbijao i to je mogući razlog zašto ova špijunska stranica neće da se učita.

Danas malo izgleda drugačije nego jučer. I dalje je samo bijela podloga na praznoj stranici ali ovaj put sa krugom koji pokazuje učitavanje na sred ekrana koji non-stop vrti i ne mijenja se. Polako napredujemo. Za koji dan možda i proradi.
38. Post 66011568 (unedited backup) (by LTU_btc) (scraped on Wed Nov 5 17:42:14 CET 2025) in 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝:
Some pools have had the same sponsors for years, I believe they had priority when it came to sponsorship offers. The others simply did not have the opportunity to join. Now that Sportsbet has come out, I believe that there will be interested casinos to take their place as sponsors of such competitions.
In recent years probably 90% of pools and competitions were under Sportsbet sponsorship. But already before last news about Sportsbet, there is more different websites sponsoring pools this season. Whale.io sponsor Ligue 1, Cross League Goal Madnesss, Rollbit Champions league, Rainbet Championship pool and etc. And maybe next season we will see even more different brands joining.
For me as player is a bit more convenient to have everything in one place, especially when you receive free bets. Butfrom other perspective, when there iscompetition, we can get bigger prize pool than when we choose from one potential sponsor.
Currently Rainbet with BSFL (S8)
Rainbet Fantasy Premier League (FPL)
Next season there is still a possibility of Rainbet entering the league pool.

And there is also Rainbet EFL Championship pool
