Iskreno, planirao sam izbaciti pregled sutra jer sam lijen, ali psoto me danas pitao Daniel kad ce lokalni pregled, evo ga sada. 

Kao i svaki put do sada, pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Studeni 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Studenog 2025

Tijekom Studenog napisali smo 237 postova, sto je pad u odnosu na Listopad (289 postova). Slican pad je bio i na ostalim boardovima tako da nismo tu nikakva iznimka, jednostavno slabiji mjesec.

---

Analiza merita za Studeni 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca na nasem boardu je podijeljeno 228 merita, sto je pad u odnosu na listpadskih 281 merit. S obzirom na slican pad broja pootova, ovo ne iznenadjuje. Unatoc tome, mislim da je i ovih 228 merita odlican rezultat, u prosjeku skoro 1 merit po postu.




Evo i liste svih koji su podijelili te primili merit tijekom proslog mjeseca. Na vrhu posiljatelja je i ovaj put Pmalek sa 63 podijeljena merita dok je na vrhu primatelja katanic sa 47.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Studenog 2025

I za kraj pregleda, popis svih clanova koji su ostavili makar 1 post na nasem boardu. slackovic je sacuvao svoje 1. mjesto i sad kad je u punoj aktivnosti, tesko ce ga itko svrgnuti sa trona, a daleko iza njega su ovcijisir na 2. te katanic97 na 3. mjestu. Ono sto veseli je povratak Daniel91, koji ce nadam se jos vise aktivirati na nasem boardu.

1. slackovic [50]
2. ovcijisir [32]
3. katanic97 [27]
4. Rikafip [25]
5. Pmalek [24]
6. dkbit98 [15]
7. examplens [14]
8. cryptofrka [13]
9. Trofo [9]
10. Daniel91 [7]
11. CroBoy12 [7]
12. paco92x [7]
13. btcltcdigger [2]
14. EXMON [2]
15. fujn [1]
16. Basil Rusakov [1]
17. powray [1]

U just checked it now and it shows merits correctly for my profile.
I can see the same 8413 merit number in forum profile and on BPIP website, but 8402 number is still visible under earned merits on BPIP website.
Maybe it needs more time to update everything, but I never paid much attention to this.

There is a lot of manipulation in this market, but some people finally realized the real value of having privacy coin that is full fungible, so yes monero performed very good this year.
If you look at street price than difference is even more obvious.

I many websites that seel stuff I always see bitcoin and monero on top, with all other coins being more like statistical error.

Silver also increased a lot, but I don't know the exact numbers.
They delisted monero from most centraslized exchange and they did everyone a favor
Even Splash exchgange said that monero coins are gone very quickly and they are not easy to purchase for a good price.

It's only listed as Zec on centralized exchanges and that is not private at all, that is only optional with addresses starting with Z.
This coins is probablycreated by one middleeast government agency I would never use it.

That’s in the event they know that you are poor or broke but, hackers can be weird at times, they would just want to get along with it just to prove that they can, test themselves maybe and have an orgasm doing it.

That’s in the case of hackers only having to hack for monetary purposes. Some of them are out there for what credentials they could get from a KYC activated account, documents they can sell and use in other illicit purposes.

Yeah, there is always a weak link that would be attacked and it always comes from compromise.

It is the state when the person realizes that he is spending too much on gambling and feels that he is losing control, so he needs to deny himself access to the platform, but still doesn't want to leave gambling completely.  By doing a self-exclusion he just needs to deny him access for some time, and hope that when the self-exclusion expires, he has a better control of himself and play again.


if one is hooked on gambling, it is indeed hard to ignore promos and offers.

There's also the fact that CEX funds come from the users themselves. To maintain the price of pairs (so they don't fall significantly, as seen in the 10/10 crash on Binance), since CEXs is more popular than swap exchanges, they have an easier time providing liquidity to practically all users.

Instant-exchanges live CCE usually start with their own funds or partner with market makers and large exchanges.

However, the game changes when private coins like XMR can no longer be traded on these CEXs, and this is where swap services like CCECash gain a significant advantage, as it's basically the only way to own XMR.

I see XMR becoming increasingly popular, even I, who tend to be a maximalist, am becoming increasingly attracted to XMR...

Our apologies — a mix-up occurred in our workflows, and some communities were inadvertently overlooked. We're addressing this promptly before the year ends. Thank you for sticking with us and caring enough to point this out, even under these circumstances.

You are an absolute liar—stop spreading falsehoods just to sensationalize someone else's misfortune.

The only reason the Central Bank of the Russian Federation asked Roskomnadzor to restrict access to our site for users in Russia was a misunderstanding. They assumed that listing information about fiat currency exchange for any currency pair violated banking laws. That's not the case—there's no such requirement for informational resources in the law—but instead of endless disputes, we chose to hide certain exchange directions for Russian residents to get the site unblocked. Now it's fully operational, facing no issues, and has become even more polished and successful than before—despite all the bad-faith actors, like you, spreading outright lies.

We've already revamped the review system in the new version of the site. Now users will have access to a rating system, whether or not there’s a financial claim involved. You can try the updated site here: https://bestchange.biz/

Over time, once we've fixed the issues and gathered enough feedback to improve the user experience, the new version will completely replace the current site. Feel free to take part in testing and suggest improvements right now!

Our site doesn’t use the concept of a 'negative review.' Comments highlighted in red aren't treated as feedback — they're financial claims, which is why they're marked as 'resolved' once the financial issue is settled. The text itself remains publicly visible (unless the user chooses to delete it).

I altovi podliježu istim AML provjerama kao i bitcoin. Njih je čak i lakše zapljeniti ili blokirati na adresama na kojim se nalaze jer su mnogi centralizovani. Na primjer, popularni stablecoini. Državne službe kontaktiraju izdavača, dostave "dokaze" ili potrebnu dokumentaciju i novac ti je blokiran.

Baš sam jučer čitao vijest da je Tether u zadnje dvije godine zaledio preko 3 milijarde USDT-a na Ethereum i Tron mrežama. Za razliku od njih, Circle je zaledio samo preko 100 miliona USDC-a u istom vremenskom periodu. USDC nije toliko popularan kao USDT, ali je ipak velika razlika.

I think around this time Arsenal's squad is fully settled. Every match is decided by one player. In previous years, it was only Odegaard, Trossard, Martinelli and Saka who made the difference. Now that burden has lifted from them too. Eze, Madueke and Zubimendi have been like a breath of fresh air for the team. I think Gyökeres will come to good form soon, with time. City's game is improving, but they have too many weaknesses. Arsenal and Villa are much more cohesive and better teams compared to City. Arsenal are doing quite well despite all these absences. That's the advantage of having a deep squad.

Ma taj cijeli pritisak na mjenjacnice da zakljucavaju sredstva po meni nema nikakvog smisla i sluzi im samo da plijene sredstva, jer sigurno dio ljudi ne pristane na KYC i sredstva im ostanu zakljucana u mjenjacnicama...

Ne znam da li postoji kakva statistika koliko je sredstava ostalo tako zakljucano. Na forumu sam procitao i da su nekima plijenili BTC i onda nakon toga koristili taj isti BTC dalje u razmjenama. Izgleda da im nije bio prljav nakon pljenidbe.

 I tko tocno vrsi taj pritisak? Taj regulator koji stoji iza toga svega sigurno ima naziv. A cilj regulatora je da poveze kripto adresu sa imenom i prezimenom, vjerojatno radi oporezivanja ili neceg trecega.

Da, baš sam razmišljao o tome nakon što sam pročitao tvoj i post od examplens. Sad mi BTC koji imam u walletu očito nije toliko sumnjiv, ali pitanje što bi dobio od njih. Možda bi taj BTC bio još sumnjiviji. Radi li to (provjera podrijetla coina) i za altove? Primjerice za USDT, ETH i slično. Jer ako se to ne može ili ako mjenjačnice to ne prate, možda je onda rješenje prebaciti sve u ETH, poslati na neki non-KYC CEX (npr. Blofin) i onda napraviti withdraw BTC na novi wallet. Naravno, tu se onda plaćaju još veće naknade ali što možemo...

Zapravo me u ovoj situaciji užasno živcira što nikad nisam ništa nelegalno radio s BTC-om, a moram se brinuti hoće li neki CEX označiti moj BTC kao rizičan. Znam da je takva situacija i s fiat novcem (npr. ako u trgovini platiš ukradenim novčanicama), ali kad je netko čuo da su nekome uzeli fiat novac jer dolazi iz neke pljačke?

That is what I thought and that is why I asked here because I don't trust them that much or as much as to believe and risk using their service. One month is very little time like you say so most probably I will be checking if they will survive the usual 3-6 months scam time and if they end up genuine service maybe after 1 year if they are still here I can use their service if I still have not found a good alternative that works here where I am. Most of such service do not work and the one which some colleagues of mine have tested named builder is not working anymore here which is sad.

Time has come for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, this time a little bit later than in previous months. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet.

---

Post activity per local board during November 2025

After the last month's increase this time we have a drop of activity; from October's 14463 posts we dropped down to 13826 posts in November. Majority of this drop happened due decreased activity in two of the most active boards, Nigerian and Russian. Drop is not huge, therefore not concerning and I am confident that it was just a little bit weaker month.

---

Active members per local board during November 2025

During the last month, 1445 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards that are part of this overview, which is almost exactly the same as in October (1446). To be honest, I expected bigger drop than that considering the drop of the number of posts, but I guess people just wrote less, nothing else.

No changes at the top; Nigerian board far ahead the other, and Russia behind on the 2nd, after many years of dominating this, and majority of the other charts.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during November 2025

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during November, leader is Polish local board with 58%, while at the same time  Pilipinas board had only 12% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French board with 67%, while Arabic board had the lowest percentage, only 25%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Portuguese and Pilipinas share the first spot, each having 53% of such members, while Romanian board had no members who wrote 10+ posts.

---

Merit shared per local board during November 2025

During November, 7414 merit was shared across local board, which is a big drop compared to October's 8427 merit. The main cause of this major drop can be found in Nigerian board, whose number of merit shared went from 2241 to 1565. Other boards contributed to this drop as well, but majority of this is decreased happened there. Drop would be much bigger if German board didn't have a big increase in the same period.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during November 2025

In November, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.54, which is an expected decrease compared to October's 0.56 and is continuation of the trend for several months now.

After losing the first spot for a couple of months, German local board is back at the top with a very high 1.66 ratio, but few others like Spanish, Italian, Arabic and Italian also have over 1+ merit per post which is an excellent ratio.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during November 2025

During November, 536 members sent while 610 received merit, which is an expected drop compared to October (654 senders and 685 receivers) due fewer merit shared.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during November 2025

And for the end, the chart that shows us merit habits of each board. Arabic remained at the top, while German local board is not that far behind with also a very high merit per tx ratio, which is not surprise given their high merit per post ratio.

---

The most active members per local board during November 2025

Last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. This time the most active member was Julien_Olynpic from Russian local with 137 posts, close 2nd was joker_josue from Portuguese localwho wrote 135 posts while 3rd was the most active member of Turkish board, mandown, who wrote 127 posts. Keep it up guys!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Julien_Olynpic [137]	|	1. MaxMueller [72]	|	1. mandown [127]	|	1. Plutosky [68]	|	1. joker_josue [135]	|	1. darxiaomi [39]	|
2. klarki [116]	|	2. mole0815 [71]	|	2. Phoenix Anka [61]	|	2. gbianchi [47]	|	2. sabotag3x [73]	|	2. famososMuertos [29]	|
3. zasad@ [56]	|	3. Unknown01 [57]	|	3. Mustang Shelby [60]	|	3. arulbero [45]	|	3. bitmover [53]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [28]	|
4. Alex077 [55]	|	4. willi9974 [55]	|	4. blomen [60]	|	4. *Ace* [41]	|	4. alegotardo [42]	|	4. danadc [28]	|
5. eisen33 [44]	|	5. MinoRaiola [50]	|	5. Hvdv [58]	|	5. fillippone [39]	|	5. Forsyth Jones [38]	|	5. Porfirii [26]	|
6. Numeral [43]	|	6. cygan [47]	|	6. xzone [57]	|	6. Lillominato89 [28]	|	6. TryNinja [34]	|	6. Hispo [15]	|
7. KTChampions [40]	|	7. Koal-84 [37]	|	7. kriminall [56]	|	7. babo [26]	|	7. mikel_012 [25]	|	7. Crystal-Trade.org [13]	|
8. PerfectumR [39]	|	8. 5tift [35]	|	8. yenerbatmaz [48]	|	8. Italian Panic [25]	|	8. rdluffy [21]	|	8. sausalitox [8]	|
9. xandry [37]	|	9. Lakai01 [31]	|	9. ingiltere [44]	|	9. Ale88 [24]	|	9. davipinheiro [20]	|	9. Filicius [6]	|
10. Unsoldier [36]	|	10. x3t9fi [28]	|	10. ZekiBeyy [43]	|	10. Paolo.Demidov [19]	|	10. velhoti [19]	|	10. darbitmobilerecovery [5]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. AakZaki [33]	|	1. patrickus [11]	|	1. blockman [55]	|	1. slackovic [50]	|	1. Jubilee58 [81]	|	1. Kavelj22 [32]	|
2. MAAManda [31]	|	2. Danydee [8]	|	2. gunhell16 [52]	|	2. ovcijisir [32]	|	2. Floxynice [71]	|	2. yhiaali3 [27]	|
3. traderethereum [30]	|	3. Saint-loup [4]	|	3. tech30338 [52]	|	3. katanic97 [27]	|	3. Charles-Tim [63]	|	3. khaled0111 [24]	|
4. Maaop7 [26]	|	4. GrosWesh [4]	|	4. cryptoaddictchie [40]	|	4. Rikafip [25]	|	4. PremiumcryptoHub [59]	|	4. GxSTxV [11]	|
5. FunshareNesialMLMPenipu [24]	|	5. winspiral [3]	|	5. arwin100 [31]	|	5. Pmalek [24]	|	5. Africolo [58]	|	5. Ochan_yazo_tochant [7]	|
6. blue Snow [22]	|	6. TryNinja [3]	|	6. finaleshot2016 [29]	|	6. dkbit98 [15]	|	6. Agbe [40]	|	6. hugeblack [4]	|
7. Luzin [21]	|	7. Halab [3]	|	7. julerz12 [27]	|	7. examplens [14]	|	7. ArabBTC [39]	|	7. RedFlix [4]	|
8. Gaza13 [21]	|	8. G.Seed [3]	|	8. GreatArkansas [24]	|	8. cryptofrka [13]	|	8. SatoPrincess [37]	|	8. 0x000369 [3]	|
9. taufik123 [20]	|	9. estenity [2]	|	9. lionheart78 [22]	|	9. Trofo [9]	|	9. Agbamoni [36]	|	9. Danydee [1]	|
10. joniboini [20]	|	10. EXMON [2]	|	10. Questat [22]	|	10. Daniel91 [7]	|	10. Yablee0 [35]	|	10. OmegaStarScream [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [10]	|	1. Bitcoin Smith [28]	|	1. cryptosize [30]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [7]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [74]	|	1. Bd officer [22]	|
2. pawel7777 [6]	|	2. JSRAW [22]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [12]	|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	|	2. Jaweria parveen [47]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [16]	|
3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. TSen [16]	|	3. alani123 [4]	|	3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. JunaidAzizi [41]	|	3. Z_MBFM [14]	|
4. EXMON [2]	|	4. pawanjain [15]	|	4. Ultegra134 [3]	|	4. othell_rogue [1]	|	4. MusaPk [27]	|	4. Crypto Library [13]	|
5. dominik_crypto [2]	|	5. LucyFurr [15]	|	5. Dimitris [1]	|	5. fujn [1]	|	5. Cheema02 [25]	|	5. Review Master [13]	|
6. Judicar [1]	|	6. henmark [10]	|	6. fujn [1]	|	6. 0vi [1]	|	6. ZAINmalik75 [20]	|	6. God Of Thunder [12]	|
7. fujn [1]	|	7. TheUltraElite [9]	|		|	7. powray [1]	|	7. Compromise me [19]	|	7. Momin_Official [10]	|
8. konopaki12 [1]	|	8. so98nn [6]	|		|		|	8. AgriTrack [18]	|	8. BlackHatSojib [8]	|
9. naglafar [1]	|	9. Cointikka [5]	|		|		|	9. BTC FutureKing [18]	|	9. Btcloop [8]	|
10. winqoo [1]	|	10. M47AK16 [5]	|		|		|	10. Doll2233 [18]	|	10. Mahiyammahi [5]	|

At the beginning yes, now no. Yet they continue wasting time on this, while they stand idly by when malicious behavior occurs. As long as they don't tag those that pay the campaigns I guess.  


I am not in the DT system, therefore I can not be "wrongly using" it. I am acting according to the "right" use of the "untrusted" part of the trust system. Instead of wasting time on me, how about giving a tag to God Of Thunder also known as naim027 or giving one to the serial scammer AB de Royse777?  

You have actually work to do unlike scammers like God of Thunder, AB de Royse777 and a few other who pretend to be "managers" but who I am not allowed to name without proof for lest the retaliate. But it is clear here who associates with who, they tend to be similar in nature.

At the beginning yes, now no. Yet they continue wasting time on this, while they stand idly by when malicious behavior occurs. As long as they don't tag those that pay the campaigns I guess. 


I am not in the DT system, therefore I can not be "wrongly using" it. I am acting according to the "right" use of the "untrusted" part of the trust system.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1724 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2672 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10044 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 3280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 8992 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 112493: Pmalek (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 8353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1888 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1852 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2200 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 12625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 6533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6521 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 3269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9348 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +138 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3508 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11100 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11258 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 525 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4500 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 4204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (57) 19708 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2917 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1331 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1002 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3581 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +53 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6502 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +78 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 11079 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1318 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2188 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1986 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9031 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3139 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7189 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (7) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3687 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3182 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2414 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 5262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5221 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1489 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +41 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 3273 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1051 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 815 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1103 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7492 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9167 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1187 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3008 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6639 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8182 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (13807 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9257 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Says who?

I've taken this quote slightly out of context. It sounds like you really don't like freedom of speech!

And yet, you opened this topic right after Satofan44 (who's not on DT) left you negative feedback. Don't you see the irony there?

---

---

For what it's worth: even though I don't agree with Satofan44's way of leaving negative feedback, many of the users he tagged were already on my ignore list. That includes OP. I don't approve of his methods but he's on to something.

Not trusting someone's judgement doesn't make him stupid. Satofan44 seems to be wasting his technical talent on flame wars on the internet. I don't see a point of more exclusions, but his list keeps growing:

We edited the original post and removed the TXID and Letter of Guarantee. We mentioned another post by user @cleanycleany as the issue has been resolved.

I kinda agree with both sides here.
Yeah, you’re not supposed to just throw your TXID around publicly - that’s fair.
But when someone straight up calls you a scammer, especially when you’re a new trying to build trust, it’s also in your interest to defend yourself and prove you’re legit. So yeah… both sides have a point heree

We could go on and on: “Never, ever accuse someone of scam, especially if you haven't even received a response from support because you wrote to us five minutes before post"

Oh, vidi stvarno. Srećom da nisam stvarno uložio lovu u projekte koje sam izabrao. Vidim da je najbolji korisnik zaradio samo oko 29% što je za bull run prava tragedija. On je stavio u PAXG koji bi trebao pratiti cijenu zlata tako da nije ni čudo da se nalazi na prvom mjestu.

A što se tiče kampanja, nadam se da ovcijisir ipak neće preuzeti štafetu od mene jer znam koliko je to frustrirajuće. Budeš sretan što si upao u neku dobru kampanju i odmah nakon tjedan-dva dođe poruka da se kampanja zatvara, pa opet sve ispočetka.

I was going to mention Condoras first, but I see his account was online a week ago, although it is marked as "memorial". So I decided to mention those who are still with us and share a line that inspired me ... Leadership is the ability to inspire others without even trying (and some statements about what it truly means to be an informal leader). A phrase that, in this chaotic, rapidly changing world, compels me to look closely and seek stability and steadfastness in those around me. These are precisely the qualities I see in Suchmoon and Mitchell ... users who know they don't need to prove anything to anyone. I must admit, I even read a few literary passages to understand whether my subconscious really gives these words the meaning that I am trying to describe, so don’t judge if our views differ)


27,000 posts were published in the last week ... crazy.

Besides the spammers from Stake, the top poster list actually includes some good, high-quality posters that deserve attention, as well as the Swiss Guard. But I'd like to mention the person behind the Wall Observer bot, ChartBuddy. Who are you, dude? You really are a forum ninja.


Without a doubt, mocacinno is a top geek for me. Every thread he writes is steeped in knowledge. And his thread from five years ago is still in my bookmarks. His thread from five years ago is still in my bookmarks, and I refer to it every time I communicate with my clients. I also admire willi9974, a truly cool representative of the German-speaking section and a true Bitcoiner who oversees Groupbuy Solo Mining, a Bitcoin party that collectively mined 193 BTC over 10 years. By the way, you can join if you want ... Blockparty 2025 Number 2 (which I joined a week ago) is currently active.


Distancing/ceasing Epochtalk development is a truly significant event, as it would have been too painful for me to part with the familiar interface if the migration to Epochtalk had taken place. But now you know that I'll probably be running BCA again and again.

Also, the financial burden... Of course, looking at it through the lens of 10 years of funding, $6 million seems reasonable, but I still think it's a colossal expense.

There's something else I wanted to discuss... a thread started by gmaxwell: Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?

I'm not a financier, and there are probably users like fillippone and JayJuanGee who are much more knowledgeable about Bitcoin funds. But I thought that perhaps the forum's capital, which is over 1000 bitcoins, could be managed in such a way that users would receive dividends (perhaps combining dividends with a merit system). Or, based on the profits, we could create conditions for sustainable forum growth ... I think we can find a solution if we consider all possible options together.

What I'm getting at is that the Russian-language section has become empty, just like other sections... users who've been here for years are leaving, and those who've been here from the start aren't getting any younger. We need a solution to attract truly high-quality posters. The forum ecosystem is quite fragile, and signature campaigns won't keep the forum active forever ... after all, I don't want to launch the Casino Community Awards in five years.


Voting is subjective, right? So, I'll give my vote to BitList, a project TryNinja and I started and intend to further develop as a brand. Compared to other sites, it might seem like a hobby project, but thanks to our inexhaustible enthusiasm, you'll change your mind in just a year. BitList already includes a Bitcointalk Archive, Bitcoin site lists, forum notifiers, a PGP checker for mixers and exchanges, and a tool that helps prevent fraud (btw, I'd like to thank NotATether, as friendly competition helps us grow). A currency converter has been added to the toolkit, and there are big plans to expand its functionality. I won't go into details yet, but we're always happy to see you in the discussion thread and eagerly read your suggestions.


I really like Bitcoin art, so I'm voting for RebelMoney.

He's a user who's only recently become active and is already making significant strides. Take the time to check out his Bitcoin vision/culture.



Without a doubt, AakZaki will be the one to replace nutildah if he wants to take a vacation.  

But Lafu deserves to win the nomination more than anyone else: Report Malware and Suspicious Links here so Mods can take Action!


PowerGlove clearly deserves a nomination for the forum patches he rolled out and for his help with this and other events I managed with GazetaBitcoin. TryNinja is a jack of all trades... there are those who are passionate, but there are also truly talented users in their field who not only understand your vision but can also implement it. Inspace has been a wonderful assistant for over a year, understanding you instantly. This user not only saves me a lot of time each week, but over the past year has become a benchmark for managing various weekly events.


In my opinion, the largest concentration of famous names and high-quality posters is in the Croatian section (if we talk about the ratio of activity with other sections), but let's focus on those for whom, as it seems to me, I have not voted yet. Each of these guys is unique in their own way and has a strong point of view, the echoes of which extend far beyond the local section. So, as GB said, the three of you won an Oscar in the same category!


A gang of sexual perverts has captured the Fox Queen's full attention, so apparently she's unaware of my unrequited love. I sense someone among her subjects who disrupted last year's elections. Otherwise, how can she explain that all this year she's been doing nothing but watching the throne room?

Oh, I see now. You know, I'm not really a tech-savvy person, but because of things like this that I read, I'm really gaining additional knowledge,
like what you're saying here, dude, about this kind of thing.

Also, before, I used to think that mirror domains were phishing links back when I didn't know any better, but because of what I read here, I'm really gaining knowledge and now I know at least a little bit.

Good point. But out of curiousity if it was 10k in value and now you sell those at 100k doesnt that mean its 90k profit? Which means huge taxes have to be paid?🙈

I've never used it, and when I check their website it looks like a typical ICO bubble site. From what I've seen, it has less privacy and (at this moment) more hype than Monero. I don't really care about being traded on centralized exchanges, that's the last thing a privacy coin needs. It may help to temporarily hype up the price though.

Manchester City and Aston Villa have gone a very good run of games and a lot of points. Arsenal are no longer clear favourites to win the Premier League.

Here is the Premier League table. It will change later this evening after Manchester United host Newcastle United and when the remaining games take place this weekend starting tomorrow:





Not at all, I will not counter anything

Nije mi problem koristiti centraliziranu mjenjačnicu sve dok ne traže KYC. Probao sam Swapuz ali nekako mi se čini dosta skup. Naknada za swap je 0.8%. Znam da su instant swap mjenjačnice skuplje od klasičnih CEX-ova, ali ovo je baš puno skuplje. Na klasičnom CEX-u je fee oko 0.01%.

Ipak, provjerio sam informaciju da ih se kontaktira za provjeru adrese. Poslao sam im poruku preko Telegrama (ima link na webu) i čovjek mi se javi nakon nekoliko minuta. Rekao sam da koristim istu Bitcoin adresu već nekoliko godina, da želim BTC zamijeniti za ETH ali zbog privatnosti ne želim raditi KYC, te da me zanima mogu li kod njih bez problema napraviti swap. Poslao sam mu Bitcoin adresu, provjerio je i za par minuta mi javio da nema nikakvih problema. Sad je jedino problem velikog fee-a koji naplaćuju za swap.

Baš ću isto probati napraviti s Blofin mjenjačnicom. Poslat ću im isti upit.

Osim Swapuz mjenačnice, examplens je spomenuo i Exolix, ali ja je namjerno nisam naveo. To je ona burza koja je korisniku poslala kripto koji je potekao iz neke krađe/hacka a navodno vrše sve potrebne AML i SoF provjere.

I Swapuz je centralizovana mjenačnica. Da ne misliš da je ona neki izuzetak ili da je decentralizovana. Instant mjenačnica ali ipak CEX. Ako se odlučiš da mijenjaš preko njih, to će onda bit zanimljiv test da vidimo šta kaže njihova korisnička služba i koliko su spremni da izađu korisnicima u susret koji ih zamole da im provjere adrese.

You still have 2 wishes left my lord. 

E, hvala ti puno na ovim informacijama. Ne znam treba li me biti sram, ali jedva da sam čuo za neke od ovih burzi. Nisam siguran jesam li promašio post o Swapuz burzi ili sam jednostavno zaboravio, ali mislim da će taj put biti najbolji. Sad kad smo već raspravljali o tome, najbolje je odmah "očistiti" Bitcoin koji imam umjesto da ga slučajno pošaljem na neki CEX i onda eto problema.

Blofin je centralizovana mjenačnica. Kao i svi drugi takvi CEX-ovi, u svojim uslovima korištenja spominju KYC i provjeru identiteta. Možda to ne rade svima ili često ali ako ima potrebe, budi siguran da hoće. Bacit će te pod autobus ako im je to u interesu i ako budu morali.

Kad sam spomenuo no KYC mjenačnice, mislio sam na Peach Bitcoin, Splash, Thorchain, Bisq, ili nešto slično.

examplens je u jednom od prethodnih postova spomenuo da se može kontaktirati korisnička služba Swapuz instant mjenačnice i tražiti od njih da ti provjere 'risk score' adrese. Ako ti oni kažu da je sve ok, onda bi to značilo da kod njih možeš uraditi swap bez dodatnih pitanja. Nemoj misliti da je ovo preporuka. Nisam nikad koristio tu mjenačnicu ali ako već rade taj 'taint score', više mi se sviđa taj njihov sistem nego da prvo pošalješ pa onda razmišljaš hoće li blokirati i šta dalje.

As far as I know, he lost almost all the money he had earned during his career, not only because of this incident, but also due to his short-sighted lifestyle at the time. In fact, his lack of financial management skills and reckless spending on a luxurious lifestyle led him to declare bankruptcy in 2003. It's worth noting that Tyson is far from the only athlete who has lost almost all his money due to poor money management. This is a common problem among young professional athletes.
p.s.
By the way, meanwhile, Betfury has published a promo code for 50 "free" spins.

Slot #: 25
BTC Address: bc1quazl54eae6u42dxgatq8n4xsjpc9ypqs5zngsj,

---

Helping with the recap so the team can easily input it into the OP.

---

The slot numbers that are not yet filled from 1–50 are:

13, 21, 24, 28, 30, 31, 32, 47

Even before choosing that particular service station without someone having to tell you or recommend it to you, you may have to drive to all the three of them to experience which one has the best quality and reliability.
Maybe they are trying to find out which strategy has much better positive results before sticking to it. I however do hope that the time frame they will use will be much longer for a broader picture.

There are others, who are quite few, which try to keep playing as long as possible, like Cristiano Ronaldo and even Federer. They try to accumulate as many titles as possible and put their name in the history of the sport, or whatever... These few athletes make so much money that in the end I believe they are all about records and titles, not money anymore.

Let me share my perspective on this.
The Bitz team introduced a new manager to me a couple of weeks ago, and my previous contact person is no longer with them. The current contact person was not familiar with the forum. I was talking to them just a few days ago and told them about my forum situation, and they said, 'No worries!' They refilled the escrow wallet twice already.

They asked me how they could reach other managers, and I forwarded them to the service board. When I noticed another campaign on the service section, I reached out to my contact and asked if I should pause mine and return the escrowed funds. They said that my campaigns have nothing to do with others, so I should not pause the campaign. I don't find it disrespectful, but kinda competitive, which should be a good thing.

Both managers have made statements... that this is all an experiment by Bitz, maybe the evaluation results will see who will last.

I saw in the God of Thunder campaign thread that the escrow address has been filled again, there is a possibility that God of Thunder will also last long despite some controversy on the reputation board.

Bc.game... Ohh yes I remember that time, moved to another manager while the first campaign was still running if I'm not mistaken.

Ho Ho Ho !
As promised, here is the latest update before the final results.
Well... It looks like I have lost my place on the podium. With Christmas coming up, I'm likely to end up with the chocolate medal.
The top three are within 50$ of each other. Nothing is decided yet.
See you on January 1, 2026.

Pos	Users	22/12/2025
1	internetional	1 293,89
2	LoyceV	1 273,03
3	paid2	1 247,44
4	Halab	1 164,87
5	GazetaBitcoin	1 040,87
6	sompitonov	935,82
	Bitcoin	884,51
7	DireWolfM14	864,38
8	memehunter	841,83
9	examplens	787,76
10	ajiz138	656,70
11	icopress	605,41
12	n0nce	541,85
13	B1g4udge	493,61
	Average	487,21
14	FinneysTrueVision	485,11
15	shahzadafzal	464,56
16	rat03gopoh	464,03
17	Smartprofit	437,39
18	DYING_S0UL	435,21
19	Rikafip	398,28
20	GrosWesh	394,54
21	Despairo	346,13
22	Saint-loup	339,15
23	LogitechMouse	336,25
24	jokers10	322,65
25	SamReomo	319,95
	Random_but_balanced	297,25
26	Taskford	295,40
27	xandry	285,12
28	tokeweed	281,72
29	cryptofrka	260,26
30	Woodie	221,07
31	klarki	211,34
32	worldofcoins	201,37
33	Buchi-88	199,26
34	bitmover	184,92
35	famososMuertos	181,90
36	libert19	173,76
37	arallmuus	169,72
38	Koal-84	137,54
39	xLays	102,88
40	slackovic	91,29

                  


Line chart race : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/
LCR without Woodie  : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/24269401/