Last update: 2026-03-19_Thu_02.06h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66524153 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Thu Mar 19 02:03:13 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:

Quote from: examplens on March 18, 2026, 11:11:07 PM

waiting for the next steps Smiley
You need to post your wallet address from nyknyc, so Zen.land team can create an escrow contract.
note: NYKNYC wallet is just an additional feature, the basic functionality is the zen.land platform.

Thanks examplens.

Just edited my previous post with my wallet address.

I think I understand the platform better now. Already saw the place to upload the PDF, which they will send me.



2. Post 66522381 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 15:19:26 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:

thanks for inviting me examplens

Zenland, have you been to altcoinstalks.com?

There was recently an ethereum mixer project which scammed a lot of users. 
I think your service might be useful in that forum.

https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=330651.0



3. Post 66522299 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 14:53:07 CET 2026) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:

Quote from: examplens on March 17, 2026, 10:03:30 PM
There is one more piece of information for you. The Bridgoro sub on Reddit is still active, without suspension or any restrictions. Incredible, isn't it?  Wink
There was no special activity, but the service was also in development mode.
Maybe you could slowly think about getting active there as well. I assume icopress is still in charge of marketing. I'm sure he has good ideas for Reddit as well
That's incredible. THANKS A LOT!
We've been fully focused on launching Bridgoro and to be honest marketing (including Reddit) slipped through the cracks.
We really appreciate you maintaining the Bridgoro subreddit for us.
Before we become active there, we need to sort out a proper Reddit account setup that allows us to post without running into bans or restrictions.
Thanks again for your support it means a lot!



4. Post 66522172 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 14:05:31 CET 2026) in ⚡🌍⚡b1eXch’s Bitcointalk Swap Frenzy – Trade hard, rank higher⚡🌍⚡:

Hey fellas,

tagging you all here with the blessing (and recommendation) from icopress Grin
Basically wanted to invite you to participate in the b1eXch’s Swap Frenzy if you by any chance didn't know it's being held.

In short, it's designed to test out b1eXch, have a little bit of friendly competition while doing it and potentially earn some rewards in the process.

Our total prize budget is 7k$, will be 9k$ if we get a few more people to participate, and there are also weekly raffles on top of that for all who swap during that week.

We just entered the new month, we finished the previous one with 22 participants and over 75k$ in volume across 234 swaps.

Check it out, drop a few swaps if you like and you might win some prizes along the way Smiley

Code:
TypoTonic
TokenTikas
crwth
Ultegra134
Awaklara
dansus021
notocactus
5tift
internetional
ZAINmalik75
Buchi-88
MaxMueller
summonerrk
safar1980
tvplus006
Numeral
mole0815
SamReomo
PX-Z
rat03gopoh
PrivacyG
NotATether
NeuroticFish
The Cryptovator
joker_josue
DireWolfM14
inspace
DaveF
Lakai01
Husna QA
examplens
TryNinja
xandry
BlackHatCoiner
mikeywith



5. Post 66522116 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 13:45:19 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:21:04 AM
Ako ti entry fee omogucava vise inspiracije i diskusiju u takvim threadu, to svakako pomaze za ispunjavanje gambling kvote u kampanji. Plus, pretpostavljam da ovi sa multiaccountima ne placaju fee za sve svoje alt, sto utice na visi kvalitet razgovora tamo. Sigurno i menadzeri drugacije gledaju na to u odnosu na gomilu besmislenih prica koje se otvaraju u toj sekciji.
Cini se kao win-win situacija.

Nitko tko ne sudjeluje ne piše tamo. Jednom u 3 mjeseca uleti padobranac s nekim postom i većina ga prijavi.
BSFL je zapravo postao nekakav hub za tjednu raspravu o većini aktualnih sportskih tema i jako mi je drago da je ispalo tako jer smo i željeli napraviti neko mjesto gdje će ljudi koji gledaju sport moći pričati o njemu bez spama uz malo zdrave zajebancije.

Prijer - stavimo golf u pitanja i dio ekipe stvarno gleda golf i iskomentira što se događa. Ne bi mi nikad palo na pamet da će ljudi pratit šah uživo - al treba im za pobjedu pa prate Grin



6. Post 66521974 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 12:41:31 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:13:54 AM
Did I miss something?
The 10 USDT transaction is confirmed on the explorer, but I don't see it in the wallet. Only two transactions are within the escrow contract.
Just want to transfer and stake this reward as Zen.land agent, it seems that I will prefer to switch to my (hardware) wallet, where I have a greater sense of control and safety.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:13:54 AM
Did I miss something?
The 10 USDT transaction is confirmed on the explorer, but I don't see it in the wallet. Only two transactions are within the escrow contract.
Just want to transfer and stake this reward as Zen.land agent, it seems that I will prefer to switch to my (hardware) wallet, where I have a greater sense of control and safety.

Thanks for pointing this out - let me clarify how it works.

This is one of the changes we made compared to the traditional Web3 wallet flow. The page you're currently viewing is focused on gas-related activity. Since gas is abstracted in ERC-4337 wallets, we separated this view to avoid confusion.

Your actual assets are still in your wallet, but they may not be visible yet because the token hasn’t been added. You can manually add USDT to your wallet here https://nyknyc.app/app/wallets/.
USDT Address on Ethereum 0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206994597c13d831ec7

Also, regarding the transactions page - at the moment it only shows outgoing transactions. This is intentional. On Ethereum, wallets often receive a large number of spam or irrelevant incoming transactions (including scam tokens), and displaying all of them tends to create more confusion than clarity. For that reason, we currently focus on outgoing activity.

That said, we already have in our backlog an improvement to automatically detect and display popular tokens (like USDT) once they reach your wallet, so this process will become much smoother.




7. Post 66521581 (unedited backup) (by b1ack) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 09:50:25 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on March 15, 2026, 11:28:13 AM
As mentioned, the swap itself cannot happen "instantly," since a certain number of confirmations must be waited for, and this takes varying amounts of time depending on the blockchain in question. Of course, confirmations are essential; doing without them would leave the exchange wide open to attacks.
Even when you go to a physical fiat exchange, you cannot do an instant swap, it takes a few minutes at best. With instant exchanges, waiting for transaction confirmation makes the whole process take longer than "instant."

btw. b1ack, after how many confirmations is the swap process activated on the Ethereum network? (If there are differences in the number of required confirmations depending on the network, maybe you should write about it somewhere in the ToS)

We can't reveal our exact confirmation requirements, as this information could be used for targeted attacks.

What we can say: confirmation requirements are dynamic based on transaction value. Small amounts require fewer confirmations and process faster. Larger amounts require more confirmations for security.

Example: A $50 swap might process after 1-2 confirmations, while a $5,000 swap needs more confirmations to ensure security.

---

Quote from: tvplus006 on March 15, 2026, 01:11:18 PM
...We cannot make Bitcoin confirm faster. Nobody can. What we can do is execute the moment confirmations are received, and that's exactly what we do...
The speed of the exchange will depend on what commission the client and the exchange use when sending the transaction to the mempool. And if the client uses a low commission, it may take several hours to complete such a transaction. So the speed of the exchange depends not only on the exchange, but also on the client. And what kind of commission does the b1exch set to increase priority, and is it permanent?

You're absolutely right - swap speed depends on both sides.

Your incoming transaction:
If you send with low fees, it takes longer to confirm. We can't speed this up - we're waiting for blockchain confirmations.

Example: You send BTC with 1 sat/vB during high congestion → might take hours for first confirmation. Nothing we can do except wait.

Our outgoing transaction:
We monitor current mempool conditions and use appropriate fees to ensure your payout confirms within reasonable time (usually 20-40 minutes for Bitcoin).

We don't use a fixed fee rate - we adjust based on current network conditions. When mempool is congested, we increase fees. When it's clear, we use lower fees.

Bottom line: For fastest swaps, use higher fees when sending to us. We'll handle fast payouts on our end.

---

Quote from: internetional on March 16, 2026, 02:15:16 PM
Instant exchanges doesn't swap your coins instantly because that's not possible however
That is exactly what I was asking about. I often exchange bitcoins for fiat money on P2P platforms, and many people who run exchanges there follow a simple rule: as soon as they see that the fiat payment has been credited to their account, they immediately release the bitcoins. Quite often this process is even automated - a bot monitors bank notifications and instantly releases bitcoins once the notification about the incoming fiat payment is received.

Because of my experience with fiat exchanges, I find it quite surprising that in the crypto-to-crypto swaps an exchange is called "instant" even when the counter-transaction is not sent at the moment the user's transaction is received, but only after some delay (b1ack mentions up to 60 seconds for most pairs). What is the difference here compared to crypto-to-fiat exchanges? Why is instant sending possible there, but not possible here? What exactly requires this time - up to 60 seconds - in crypto-to-crypto swaps? If everything is automated, why isn't the algorithm configured to send the counter cryptocurrency at the exact moment it receives a notification that the client's transaction has arrived?

Good question - there's a key difference between fiat P2P and crypto-to-crypto exchanges.

Fiat P2P (why it can be "instant"):
Bank transfer is irreversible once confirmed. The seller checks their bank account, sees the money, releases Bitcoin. Done. The fiat can't be clawed back (usually).

Crypto-to-crypto (why we need delays):

We need to perform several security checks before sending your payout:

Blockchain confirmation verification - Is the transaction actually confirmed, or just broadcast?

Double-spend checks - Multiple node verification to ensure transaction is valid across our redundant nodes

RPC sanity checks - Cross-checking multiple nodes to prevent node attack/manipulation

Fiat value calculation - Fetching real-time rates from multiple sources to determine accurate payout amount

Liquidity checks - Ensuring we have sufficient reserves for payout

Security validations - Making sure nothing suspicious about the transaction
[/list]

These checks take 30-60 seconds typically.

Why we use multiple nodes:

Node attacks aren't uncommon. A malicious actor could spin up a fake node and feed us false information (like fake confirmations). By checking multiple independent nodes, we protect against this.

Example: If 1 node says "confirmed" but 2 other nodes say "unconfirmed," we know something's wrong and don't process the swap.

Why we use multiple fiat sources:

Prevents manipulation. If we used one price source and it gets compromised or shows wrong rates, you could get incorrect payout amounts.

The 60-second delay protects both you and us.

---

Quote from: AakZaki on March 16, 2026, 06:31:26 PM
  • Bitcoin (BTC)Going Live Today


b1ack is there indeed a slowdown regarding this, you said that BTC will be relaunched on the 15th yesterday. however, as of the 16th, BTC is still unavailable. You haven't given an update on this either? Approximately when will everything be back to normal, I would like to try to make another transaction, I hope I find what you said, "Increased Swap Speed"



-snip-
And what kind of commission does the b1exch set to increase priority, and is it permanent?

I don't think it's permanent. Apart from blockchain fees, there are swap priority fees that are happening you just need to set this section.


We've been working on internal testing before pushing it live. Happy to announce - it's live now!

Quick clarification: That's not "swap priority fees" - it's rate protection.

How rate protection works:

When you're doing a swap and coin exchange rates move against you, rate protection prevents you from taking a loss.

Example:
- You start a BTC → ETH swap
- Quote: You'll get 10 ETH
- Rate protection: 3%
- During processing, ETH price drops
- You'd now only get 9.5 ETH (>3% loss)
- Swap automatically cancels
- You get refunded instead of eating the loss

It's a safety feature to protect you from unfavorable rate movements during the swap process.

---

Quote from: Lakai01 on March 17, 2026, 06:53:49 AM
I'm also waiting for BTC to go live to try and make a swap, let's just keep being patient in the meantime. They did say it was a critical update though, so maybe it's taking a lot more time than they initially expected. Anyway, I'm sure they will post another update when it's ready. Wink

I'm also eagerly looking forward to the ETH-BTC pair going back online. I've got a handful of ETH just waiting to finally be converted Wink

Joking aside, b1ack did mention that this is a critical system update. Updates like this can not only take longer than expected—unplanned delays—but also require extensive testing. In this case, it's actually better to be offline for an extra day or two so they can use that time to thoroughly test the software. But in any case, I'm already very excited about the new pairs; I think the integration of additional stablecoins is a great idea.

Thank you for understanding.

Our next coin additions will be focused on Ethereum and ERC-20 tokens. We're building the infrastructure to support more ERC-20 stablecoins and tokens.


We're taking time to do this right - extensive testing before launch to ensure security and reliability.



8. Post 66521433 (unedited backup) (by internetional) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 08:50:19 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on March 17, 2026, 09:10:58 PM
I understand that the blockchain is needed to finalize the transaction. But how exactly can it prevent the transaction from being sent instantly?

Or did you mean something else?
Are you trolling here?
First, you explained why the transactions are not instant, then you asked why they are not instant. It seems like trolling to me.
There's no trolling here.

First, I asked:
Quote from: internetional on March 14, 2026, 02:19:36 PM
could you share how long the process usually takes for you - from the moment your transaction receives the required number of confirmations to the moment the counter transaction is sent? After all, b1exch.to is also described as "instant". Is it always instant, or do delays sometimes occur?
Then b1ack replied:
Quote from: b1ack on March 14, 2026, 03:01:25 PM
To answer honestly — once your deposit has the required confirmations on its native blockchain (which we don't control, that's between you and the network), the actual swap execution on our end typically completes in under 60 seconds for most pairs.
That made me curious about the purpose of that small delay, so I asked:
Quote from: internetional on March 16, 2026, 02:15:16 PM
What exactly requires this time - up to 60 seconds - in crypto-to-crypto swaps? If everything is automated, why isn't the algorithm configured to send the counter cryptocurrency at the exact moment it receives a notification that the client's transaction has arrived?
joker_josue replied:
Quote from: joker_josue on March 16, 2026, 06:25:20 PM
Because here there is something called blockchain.

I didn't understand that answer, so I asked him to explain what the blockchain had to do with it. After all, I am talking about the time it takes to send cryptocurrency to the client after the transaction in which the exchange received the client's crypto has already been confirmed on the blockchain.

So I honestly don't even understand where anyone could see trolling here. Most likely, the problem is simply that neither joker_josue nor you really looked into the context of my question. You didn't read that what interested me was
* not why the client does not receive the new cryptocurrency immediately after sending the old one (that part is obvious to everyone),
* but what the swap processing technically consists of, that is, what actions exactly the algorithm needs time to perform during the interval between the moment the client's cryptocurrency has already been received and the moment the other cryptocurrency has not yet been sent to the client.



Quote from: examplens on March 17, 2026, 09:10:58 PM
Do you have any examples where a service (of any kind) has instant billing, but in your view on this matter? I would like to test it.
When the Localbitcoins website was still operating, you could buy scripts on Telegram that automated trades there. I didn't test them myself, but their developers claimed that the scripts monitored notifications from banks and payment services about incoming fiat deposits and released bitcoins instantly. (By "instantly" - in the sense mentioned by joker_josue, meaning very quickly, with no noticeable delay.)

Now you probably won't be able to test them, since Localbitcoins has been inactive for quite a long time.



9. Post 66521310 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Wed Mar 18 07:42:49 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:

Quote from: examplens on March 17, 2026, 12:02:02 PM
edit: fulfilled

OK, I got it.
Here is my first impression.
Zen.land v2 looks much better now than before. I think that part is clearer now, and it's quite simplified.
For a better analysis, I will wait until the contract is fully executed, and I will have to create an escrow to test that part of the process as well.

Accept link from contract, lead me to error 404 page
https://zen.land/accept/0x3dCb130E16bB989F19EF34439E9e05fb35923536

NYC your app?
I have to admit that I'm not a huge fan of web3 wallets, and NYKNYC just confirmed that I'm sticking to my current methods.
Although it is probably a simple wallet, the UX (I chose dark mode) made me quite confused. Everything is the same black color, input fields (seed input field  Sad), space, links, buttons... difficult to navigate

During the second transaction, this error appeared, if I understood correctly, the wallet did not immediately adjust the gas fee. After the re-publish transaction, everything was ok.

Thank you @examplens, the funds were released.

With NYKNYC, we’re trying to address the adoption barrier in web3, though we recognize there’s still a long way to go. The goal is to combine the security of web3 wallets with a more familiar web2-like interface. I’ll add the redesign concerns to our backlog as we gather more user feedback.

Thanks for flagging the issue with the link - it’s already been fixed and will be rolled out in the next Zenland update. I appreciate your feedback and the time you took to review everything.



10. Post 66520378 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 22:25:38 CET 2026) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:15:17 PM
Welcome back or happy beginning  Wink
Looking at the EU market and MiCA regulation, if you are already thinking about stablecoins, it has somehow become apparent that USDC is needed as an option, because Tether does not meet the necessary conditions of regulation on the EU market.
Hey examplens,
Thanks for your continued support of the project!
Yes, we plan to start working on stablecoin integration in the next month or two, once we've finalized the current pairs and confirmed everything is running smoothly.

Q3-Q4 2026 - Stablecoin Integration
Adding support for DAI (ERC), USDT (ERC, TRC, SOL) and USDC (ERC, TRC, SOL) trading pairs.
Expanding liquidity and usability for traders worldwide.



11. Post 66519887 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 20:12:43 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Lock & unlock



Quote from: LogitechMouse on Today at 01:43:32 PM
Sorry for the 2 rounds that I didn't participate. I totally forgot it.  Wink Wink

Sorry, but you had two lifes, you missed two rounds, and you lost two lifes. So you are out (and MIA).



Here are your predictions for round 9 :

   Name         Prediction      B/M   
   Hypnotizer         71 856,55         
   Pmalek            73 401,00         
   Leahized            73 582,00         
   Doan9269            73 606,00      0,25% p.malus   
   examplens            73 999,00         
   xLays                 74 067,00         
   promise444c5          74 208,00         
   GazetaBitcoin         74 223,00         
   cryptofrka         74 250,00      0,75% p.malus   
   LoyceV            74 665,85         
   ESG            75 555,55         
   Danydee         80 750,00         



12. Post 66518344 (unedited backup) (by Yamane_Keto) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 12:28:49 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on March 15, 2026, 11:28:13 AM
after how many confirmations is the swap process activated on the Ethereum network? (If there are differences in the number of required confirmations depending on the network, maybe you should write about it somewhere in the ToS)
From what I've seen when exchanging, they are requesting 14 confirmations.

Quote from: Lakai01 on Today at 06:53:49 AM
Joking aside, b1ack did mention that this is a critical system update. Updates like this can not only take longer than expected—unplanned delays—but also require extensive testing. In this case, it’s actually better to be offline for an extra day or two so they can use that time to thoroughly test the software.
Adding all these pairs may require some testing before pool being updated. after this update, only Dogecoin is not among the well known tokens supported by Thorchain.



13. Post 66518157 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 11:12:43 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on March 15, 2026, 12:01:58 PM
I'm also surprised by how many new instant exchange launches have occurred in the last few months. Coincidentally, it's near the time when this forum no longer allows mixer promotion (if my memory is right). I guess the demand is just that high that some owners think they can absorb the volumes from previous services.

Most of these new services suffer the same attacks, too, as far as I'm aware. I wonder if the attackers are the same or not.
The increase in new instant exchanges has nothing to do with mixers or the ban on promoting them here.

It happens that the growth of industrial branches is at stake. Some bigger players have adapted and created a simple model for resellers. A domain and hosting are enough, and you can start your business, you don't even need any technical knowledge (and not even initial capital) to start your own instant exchange.
If you look only at those who operate with their own liquidity funds and at real no-KYCs (like Sageswap), you will see that there aren't too many of them.

Yes, you are right.
Given the increased crypto regulation, especially in the US and the EU, it is clear that there is an increased desire of users for crypto services without kyc.
It's not just that users want to maintain their privacy and anonymity, but that many users have difficulties proving the origin of their funds to tax and other authorities, and it's often very complicated to show all transactions in the tax return through the FIFO method.
Unfortunately, in recent years, many crypto exchanges have started to introduce kyc regulation under pressure from the authorities, so it's increasingly difficult to find a kyc crypto exchange that doesn't require kyc.
In short, if there is a demand for a service, for completely legal reasons, an offer will appear to fill the gap in the market.  Cheesy
I hope Crypto Swap will be with us for a long time.



14. Post 66518035 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 10:16:44 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 08:02:23 AM
Nisu li upravo ti "naši dečki" dokazali da je moguce zaraditi merit u gambling delu.
Isto tako su dokazali da pored toga sto im je najveca aktivnost u gambling sekciji, prilicno su atratktivni za signature kampanje, uvek lako prihvaceni, najcesce u najvisi platni razred.

Možda je moguće zaraditi Merit tamo, ali mislim da je puuuno lakše zaraditi ih kod nas u lokalnoj sekciji. Pogotovo ako znamo da nekome nedistaje Merita. Ali ovisi i o tome što pišeš u Gambling sekciji. Malo sam bacio oko na postove od Joca97 i vidim da su zapravo OK. Naravno, ne može se mjeriti s Trofom i cryptofrkom jer oni i vode neke pool-ove i natjecanja pa su automatski poznatiji menadžerima koji vode kampanje. Ali po meni nema razloga da se brine oko ulaska u kampanje. Kad netko traži jednog ili dva člana, gotovo je nemoguće upasti. Ali u nove kampanje je zapravo prilično lako upasti ako je jedan od uvjeta pisanje u Gambling sekciji, a korisnik je aktivan tamo.



Moram priznati da se ja ne sjećam da sam ikada dobio merit u gambling sekciji  Grin
To se jednostavno pokazalo kao ''nemoguća misija''.
Većina signature kampanja, jer su povezane s klađenjem, forsiraju da se što više piše u gambling dijelu što dovodi do ''štancanja'' velikog broja postova bez previše smisla a prave rasprave zapravo i nema, jer nitko ni ne čita prethodne postove.
Osoba A napiše da će Aston Villa osvojiti Evropsku ligu i onda idućih 50 postova budu različite varijacije tog istog posta, bez ikakve originalnosti, analiza itd.
Mene to iskreno zamara i ne vidim što vlasnici kampanja dobivaju od takvih ''umjetnih'' postova pisanih po zadatku, samo da se odradi obveza.
Osobno mi se čini da je gambling sekcija po kvaliteti jedan od lošijih dijelova foruma (i drago mi je da pisanje u gambling sekciji nije obveza u mojoj kampanji pa pišem samo u temama koje me zanimaju poput nastupa naših klubova).
Joci savjetujem da počne pisati i u drugim dijelovima foruma, posebno na našem lokalu jer će tu najlakše doći do merita a da u gambling sekciji pokuša biti originalan i pisati o onome što najbolje zna, i tako će iskočiti od konkurencije i biti prepoznat kao dobar kandidat za neku kampanju.  Cheesy



15. Post 66517990 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 09:52:20 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 06:29:55 PM
OK, let me try this new version of Zenland

Here is my nyknyc.app address: 0xFc5c4a9375A282Fc1De9A824F6Bca971bD0Fa4d9



Happy to see you onboard, examplens!

Here is your PDF Contract: View Contract

You can verify its authenticity at zen.land/verify

The contract has been created and is ready for you - feel free to accept and fulfill it at your convenience.

Good to know: With Zenland V2, you no longer need to ask a seller to log in to the platform. Just get their Web3 wallet address, create the escrow, and send them the PDF contract - that's it.

Looking forward to your feedback!

How contract looks like:



16. Post 66517876 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 09:02:25 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 03:58:42 PM
Nisu li upravo ti "naši dečki" dokazali da je moguce zaraditi merit u gambling delu.
Isto tako su dokazali da pored toga sto im je najveca aktivnost u gambling sekciji, prilicno su atratktivni za signature kampanje, uvek lako prihvaceni, najcesce u najvisi platni razred.

Možda je moguće zaraditi Merit tamo, ali mislim da je puuuno lakše zaraditi ih kod nas u lokalnoj sekciji. Pogotovo ako znamo da nekome nedistaje Merita. Ali ovisi i o tome što pišeš u Gambling sekciji. Malo sam bacio oko na postove od Joca97 i vidim da su zapravo OK. Naravno, ne može se mjeriti s Trofom i cryptofrkom jer oni i vode neke pool-ove i natjecanja pa su automatski poznatiji menadžerima koji vode kampanje. Ali po meni nema razloga da se brine oko ulaska u kampanje. Kad netko traži jednog ili dva člana, gotovo je nemoguće upasti. Ali u nove kampanje je zapravo prilično lako upasti ako je jedan od uvjeta pisanje u Gambling sekciji, a korisnik je aktivan tamo.




17. Post 66517735 (unedited backup) (by Tręvoid) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 07:32:01 CET 2026) in [FIXEDFLOAT SCAMS MEGATHREAD] Reports, Frozen Funds, Abuses, and KYC Traps:

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 02:24:09 PM
Quote
In September 2025, I created an exchange order (ETH → XMR) on FixedFloat. After sending funds, the transaction was stopped, and my money was frozen. The support team asked for proof of fund origin, which I promptly provided — including a car sale agreement confirming the source. Later, they said this wasn't enough and asked again for the same document, claiming they hadn’t even reviewed it. I also sent a photo of the car’s registration certificate to speed things up.
Despite providing everything requested, the issue remains unresolved. Support keeps referring to “third-party partners” with no clear timeline or reason for such a long delay. My funds have been blocked for months without legal grounds or updates. I ask BestChange administration to review this case and warn others that funds can be frozen for a long time even after submitting all necessary documents.
Is it just me who finds this humiliating, explaining to FF where you get your money from, sending them documentation about selling a car, or anything like that?
Why do people easily agree to things like this? Explaining to fu**** FixedFloat how I made some money. It requires a fair amount of self-respect to even decide to use them.

Everyone should stop using FixedFloat.

Unfortunately, once you fall into their traps, there’s not much you can do. Some users are doing their best to recover their funds, but it’s often a losing battle an endless KYC trap. The best thing we can do now is support each other, protect our community, and spread awareness about how FixedFloat operates and selectively scams users.

Avoid SimpleSwap, FixedFloat, and ChangeNOW at all costs.



18. Post 66517551 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 05:15:50 CET 2026) in How do i prove that i am human?:

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 03:42:29 PM
It depends on how you look at the whole thing.

No, it doesn’t depend on that. What’s happening here is that there’s a kind of ‘AI-bashing’ culture on the forum that’s reinforced by merits: if you say that AI is stupid, or that the world was better before chatbots, or that the forum has gone to the dogs because of AI, your opinion is reinforced by people who share your prejudices because they give you a bunch of merits.

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 03:42:29 PM
If you look at AI usage, the closest to what ordinary people or forum users like the OP rely on, artificial intelligence has a lot of flaws. When you mention the use in medicine, perhaps you should refer to
OpenAI’s New Rules for Legal and Health Queries
Modular Safety Middleware For Health-Adjacent AI Assistants
UnitedHealthcare's broken AI denied seniors' medical claims, lawsuit alleges
There are many lawsuits against AI chatbots, because they gave wrong medical diagnoses.

That's like if you'd told me back in 1996 that the internet was a piece of crap that would never amount to anything because it was so slow, and that you couldn't use your home phone while you were on it. Quote from The Register article:

Quote
The complaint, brought by Clarkson Law Firm, alleges UnitedHealthcare unlawfully deployed an AI system with a 90 percent error rate that improperly overrode the recommendations of physicians regarding medically necessary post-acute care for the elderly, i.e. treatment following discharge from a hospital.

So, you have a new technology, and just because we have a few cases like this, are we going to rule out that new technology instead of focusing on the ones that have a negligible error rate—and one that’s getting even lower?

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 03:42:29 PM
Maybe they're not as stupid as the users who use them for nonsense and stupid prompts.

We agree on this.

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on Today at 03:28:47 AM
Lol, everything is a lie, and it's absolutely insane that so many people still willingly choose the blue pill.

The "Health Industry" doesn't sell health, they sell cures for disease they and their partners created, in some cases, using AI.
The "Educational Institutions" don't provide education, they indoctrinate and filter the useful ones from the useless and dangerous.

Seeing through the lie is easy, it's the opposite of what they've named themselves.  Some of the same text books that are used at Harvard and are also used at Alabama State, and they're all published two major publishing houses...  Owned by BlackRock.  Medical journals are notorious for "not rocking the boat."  They're also mostly owned by two publishers... who are also owned by BlackRock.  Care to take a guess who's the largest institutional holder of AI stock?  It rhymes with BlackRock.

They're not going to hand you the keys to your own freedom, that's not what AI will be used for.  They'll only make your slavery more addictive and sedated.

Sure, sure. PubMed, the Ivy League universities, the European Space Agency, etc., aren't reliable sources of knowledge. The best source of knowledge is an anonymous internet forum and especially what anti-AI users say.

I agree, in part, that the pharmaceutical industry has a greater interest in keeping diseases chronic rather than curing them. But despite the shortcomings of the pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, BlackRock, and all the other examples you might cite, humanity has achieved levels of development and well-being that were unthinkable just two centuries ago, let alone two millennia. Two centuries ago, Malthus formulated his thesis that since food production grew arithmetically while the human population grew geometrically, humanity was headed for collapse, which shares a similar spirit with the apocalyptic visions surrounding AI.






19. Post 66517398 (unedited backup) (by seoincorporation) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 03:28:38 CET 2026) in How do i prove that i am human?:

Quote from: examplens on March 16, 2026, 03:42:29 PM
It depends on how you look at the whole thing.
If you look at AI usage, the closest to what ordinary people or forum users like the OP rely on, artificial intelligence has a lot of flaws. When you mention the use in medicine, perhaps you should refer to
OpenAI’s New Rules for Legal and Health Queries
Modular Safety Middleware For Health-Adjacent AI Assistants
UnitedHealthcare's broken AI denied seniors' medical claims, lawsuit alleges
There are many lawsuits against AI chatbots, because they gave wrong medical diagnoses.

Maybe they're not as stupid as the users who use them for nonsense and stupid prompts.

Those who decide to follow medical instructions from the AI are just crazy people, i wouldn't say they deserve to die, but c'mon, that's what Darwin used to call "Natural selection". We can't trust the AI answers, all of them should be verified by a human.

And i believe the IA should have harder terms of service. It shouldn't answer about medical things or other topics that could put in risk human life.



20. Post 66517307 (unedited backup) (by crwth) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 02:09:55 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on March 14, 2026, 12:15:08 PM
Do you have a threshold that a coin must reach in order to remain listed on the b1exch platform?
I'm curious about this question as well. I guess it will be about the volume and fees generated, maybe?

Quote from: examplens on March 14, 2026, 12:15:08 PM

Woo! I can't wait for USDC base because most of the coins that I'm trading on are using BASE and ARB for their deposits. It might even be easier to trade now if I needed funds or something  Shocked




21. Post 66517215 (unedited backup) (by OgNasty) (scraped on Tue Mar 17 00:58:07 CET 2026) in How do i prove that i am human?:

Quote from: examplens on March 13, 2026, 01:47:11 PM
I undestand the fact that BitcoinTalk isn't against AI, the forum is against the abuse. If we let the AI write our post then we will be Nucked, but we can always get good ideas from AI and write a post with our own words and style, and that will be fine because the post wasn't just a copy paste.
I'm just curious how you (or any AI transcriber) came to the conclusion that others might find your transmission of an AI-generated point of view interesting. At the same time, keep in mind that all, but absolutely all, members of this forum have equal or perhaps even more advanced access to the same AI tools.
So, what kind of unique idea will AI give you, but not me or anyone else?
I'm pretty sure that most people come here to exchange opinions with real humans because we all have bot thinking at our fingertips.

I find an AI-generated point of view interesting. I’m not familiar with this user’s specific history, but I think it is a good general question that I had hoped to read some thought provoking answers about. Unfortunately I was left a bit disappointed on that front but will ponder the question internally regardless. 



22. Post 66516497 (unedited backup) (by Coyster) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 21:16:37 CET 2026) in freebitco.in password change:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:16:29 PM
So, there is no need to bother with them further, unless you have a larger amount there and still hope for the possibility of withdrawing funds.
I second that. Thanks for drawing my attention to their closure, i actually missed it and didn't know they had already announced that they would be shutting down. I have read their announcement and i find it ludicruous that they put it down to abuse in their platform, lol, are they somehow blaming their gambling community. I think the real problem was actually with the management, which i am sure changed hands a few times within the time the platform became useless.



23. Post 66515864 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 18:18:31 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on March 15, 2026, 12:01:58 PM
I'm also surprised by how many new instant exchange launches have occurred in the last few months. Coincidentally, it's near the time when this forum no longer allows mixer promotion (if my memory is right). I guess the demand is just that high that some owners think they can absorb the volumes from previous services.

Most of these new services suffer the same attacks, too, as far as I'm aware. I wonder if the attackers are the same or not.
The increase in new instant exchanges has nothing to do with mixers or the ban on promoting them here.

It happens that the growth of industrial branches is at stake. Some bigger players have adapted and created a simple model for resellers. A domain and hosting are enough, and you can start your business, you don't even need any technical knowledge (and not even initial capital) to start your own instant exchange.
If you look only at those who operate with their own liquidity funds and at real no-KYCs (like Sageswap), you will see that there aren't too many of them.

I think many exchanges are showing up because they are filling a gap left by eXch.

eXch had very large volumes in their pairs, and lot of people used it. All that money is now flowing to those new exchanges,  which many of them work very similar (no kyc crypto swaps).



24. Post 66515304 (unedited backup) (by OrangeFren) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 16:00:49 CET 2026) in OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison:

Quote from: Tręvoid on March 13, 2026, 05:54:23 AM
Hi Orangefren,

I’d like to suggest delisting Swapter from your site. They’ve had ongoing scam reports for quite some time and still haven’t taken any visible steps to address the issue.

(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5572984.0)




Good call I think. I remember investigating them about this long ago, but can't seem to recall what their response was. Will delist and see what they provide.

Quote from: examplens on March 12, 2026, 09:57:03 PM
From a business point of view, I understand why FF is quite stable on your list.
The question is whether your profit would be higher without them, because users who will risk with FF will definitely look for them because of the better exchange rate.
What would probably mean more is to leave some kind of warning next to them about the increased risk of freezing funds. That way, those (uninformed) who don't want to take risks would still be warned.
Right now, it looks like you are incentivizing users to this exchange. "Rarely KYC & SoF may be demanded." and "Users often pick this service" plus "Your trade is fully protected against this service scamming you." To me, this looks too positive for a service that is hated in the community and has a lot of scam reports against it.
What alternative or additional wording would you suggest?



We've added a bar to the bottom of the screen on OrangeFren.com to let you quickly check what the current street rates are and what the current tx fees.





25. Post 66514772 (unedited backup) (by Joca97) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 13:09:02 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:05:05 PM
Ova Kampanja je vec puna,prosto neverovatno koliko ljudi brzo grabe mesta za sve kampanje pogotovo ove nove kad izadju.
I vidim da dosta kampanja u poslednje vreme dodaje 1x 2x mesta ma solidnim pozicijama

Vegabet isto otvorio mesto za 1x sr.member
Al mislim da je bas tesko doci do ovih mesta,gde ima samo jedno ili dva slobodno
Ta kampanja svakako nije za tebe. Gledajuci po njihovoj drugoj review kampanji, cini se da su na poptuno pogresnom putu sto se tice promocije, pretpostavljam da ocekuju iz ove signature kampanje da dobiju konkretne korisnike usluge. Nisam bas siguran koliko je realisticno ocekivati prodaju hotelskog smestaja preko ovog foruma.
Trajace par nedelja maksimalno, na kraju ce doneti zakljucak da je forum beskoristan.

Ali je idealno za ove sto Daniel91 navodi, multiusere iz low tier zemalja, koji grabe sve sto se postavi na sto.

@Joca97, Nekako smo tebi vec vise puta davali savete, ali cini se da ih ignorises. Recept je jasan, moras napraviti svoj account pozeljnim za kampanje pa te nece biti briga koliko je tesko doci do mesta u opskurnim kampanjama.

Ma znam,uzimam te savete,nego samo kazem kakva je situacija za te kampanje,za takve kampanje ne vidim svoju sansu tako da vise se trudim sa ove neke nove ako se otvore skroz. Meni je uvek najveci problem Meriti i to i znam da mi govorite da moram da budu bolji postovi i plus zasluzni merita,al sta cu najvise volim u gamblingu da postujem i onda mi to predstavlja problem,videcu taman u narednih par dana da promenim neke stvari jos kad vec imam malo slobodnog vremena



26. Post 66514264 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Mon Mar 16 09:57:37 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: Joca97 on March 15, 2026, 03:09:09 PM
Danas je počela Crypto Traveler signature kampanja koju vodi AB de Royse777.
Kampanja prima Sr. Membere i članove viših rangova.

Isplata:
- $3.00 po postu
- Menadžer plaća do 20 postova tjedno

Pravila:
- Nema ograničenja u broju postova u lokalnim forumima.
- Nema obaveze pisanja u Gambling forumu.
Link ti je nesto pobegao, pa evo da te ispravim: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577376.0

Inace Crypto Traveler ima i review kampanju, ali su uslovi za korisnike jednog online foruma vise nego radikalni. Potrebno je rezervisati smestaj, let, hotel, sve to koristiti pa na kraju napisati review.

Ova Kampanja je vec puna,prosto neverovatno koliko ljudi brzo grabe mesta za sve kampanje pogotovo ove nove kad izadju.
I vidim da dosta kampanja u poslednje vreme dodaje 1x 2x mesta ma solidnim pozicijama

Vegabet isto otvorio mesto za 1x sr.member
Al mislim da je bas tesko doci do ovih mesta,gde ima samo jedno ili dva slobodno

A čuj, na ovom forumu imaš na tisuće članova a broj mjesta u kampanjama je ipak dosta ograničen, pogotovo u bolje plaćenim kampanjama.
Za nas u Evropi i Americi te kampanje su više da nas ''inspiriraju'' da budemo malo aktivniji na forumu i kao neka nagrada za aktivnost ali za ekipu iz Afrike i Azije, zemalja poput Nigerije, Bangladeša itd. ovo je zapravo posao i novac od kojeg žive.
Vjerujem da oni ovome pristupaju jako organizirano i ozbiljno, uključuju više članova obitelji i prijatelja, kreiraju više profila i povećavaju si zaradu na taj način.
Naravno da je teško upasti pored tako organizirane ekipe ali savjetujem ti da budeš svoj i originalan, da se koncentriraš na manji broj kvalitetnih postova a ne na brzo ''štancanje'' velikog broja postova kao što radi ova ekipa, i prije ili poslije netko će te prepoznati  Grin



27. Post 66512515 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Sun Mar 15 20:13:55 CET 2026) in How do i prove that i am human?:

Quote from: examplens on March 14, 2026, 12:02:09 AM
Many forget that AI collects information written by humans.
The really large majority thinks it collects the information and 'thinks' which is good and legitimate and which is not.  I could be an incredibly smart scientist and create a blog to share every provable intelligent thing that contradicts most of the rest of the Internet and Artificial Intelligence will probably not pick it up as legitimate because my author name is 'Anonymous Scientist' and because the blog is not 'Fact Checked'.

Artificial Intelligence is for most things incredibly stupid.



28. Post 66511721 (unedited backup) (by Joca97) (scraped on Sun Mar 15 16:09:14 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on March 14, 2026, 06:18:27 PM
Danas je počela Crypto Traveler signature kampanja koju vodi AB de Royse777.
Kampanja prima Sr. Membere i članove viših rangova.

Isplata:
- $3.00 po postu
- Menadžer plaća do 20 postova tjedno

Pravila:
- Nema ograničenja u broju postova u lokalnim forumima.
- Nema obaveze pisanja u Gambling forumu.
Link ti je nesto pobegao, pa evo da te ispravim: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577376.0

Inace Crypto Traveler ima i review kampanju, ali su uslovi za korisnike jednog online foruma vise nego radikalni. Potrebno je rezervisati smestaj, let, hotel, sve to koristiti pa na kraju napisati review.

Ova Kampanja je vec puna,prosto neverovatno koliko ljudi brzo grabe mesta za sve kampanje pogotovo ove nove kad izadju.
I vidim da dosta kampanja u poslednje vreme dodaje 1x 2x mesta ma solidnim pozicijama

Vegabet isto otvorio mesto za 1x sr.member
Al mislim da je bas tesko doci do ovih mesta,gde ima samo jedno ili dva slobodno



29. Post 66510840 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Sun Mar 15 09:20:02 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on March 14, 2026, 06:18:27 PM
/snip

Inace Crypto Traveler ima i review kampanju, ali su uslovi za korisnike jednog online foruma vise nego radikalni. Potrebno je rezervisati smestaj, let, hotel, sve to koristiti pa na kraju napisati review.

Kad sam vidio tvoj post, mislio sam da se šališ. Onda sam ipak išao pogledati o čemu se radi jer sam mislio kako će zbog uvjeta nagrada biti bogata. I onda šok - smatraju da će netko za 100 dolara nagrade kupiti zrakoplovnu kartu, smještaj u hotelu i eSIM karticu? Nije ni čudno da post nema niti jednog odgovora u 10 dana prije koliko je napisan.



30. Post 66510395 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Sun Mar 15 02:24:25 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Before I give you the results of round 8, I have a quick announcement to make. The cash shop maintenance needs one more round. Don’t hire Musk’s DOGE intern, he lost a USB key... Anyway... 

Round 8 is now over, here are the results :


Closing price on 14/03/2026 : 71 217$

   Name         Prediction      B/M      Final prediction      Difference   
   xLays                 71 067,00            71 067,00      150,00   
   LoyceV            70 432,00            70 432,00      785,00   
   GazetaBitcoin         70 423,00            70 423,00      794,00   
   examplens            70 066,00            70 066,00      1 151,00   
   Hypnotizer         70 065,56            70 065,56      1 151,44   
   Doan9269            70 360,00      0,5% p.malus      70 008,20      1 208,80   
   ESG            70 000,00            70 000,00      1 217,00   
   Leahized            69 785,00            69 785,00      1 432,00   
   Pmalek            69 308,00            69 308,00      1 909,00   
   cryptofrka         69 700,00      1% p.malus      69 003,00      2 214,00   
   Danydee         73 802,00            73 802,00      2 585,00   
   promise444c5          68 430,00            68 430,00      2 787,00   
                                 

Well done xLays, this is your second round win. In addition to the 50 BTC, you have now earned the "Last Will card". When you will be eliminated (if you ever are), you must send all your BTC to two participants still in the game.
Sorry, promised444c5, no cheating here. It is Bitcoin that decided to make you lose a life.

For round 9, I have been waiting for this one for quite a while. I can’t say any more, I’d rather see your reactions. Some of you will be happy, and some will be disappointed. But if I were you, I’d try to win this round to stay in control of your own destiny.




Round 9 : The great rebalancing

What will be the price of Bitcoin at March 20, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 19/03/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before March 17, 2026, 07:00:00 PM.
 
Cash shop: CLOSED
 
Special rules : None



31. Post 66507949 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Mar 14 13:19:43 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (59) 14311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (21) 9461 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4778 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1730 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2675 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10573 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4569 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3385 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9380 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6186 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 8519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1817 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6155 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2035 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 199 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (9) 6502 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (36) 1860 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2850 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +10 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 13050 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6630 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3493 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 704 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 11269 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11600 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2594 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4373 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (66) 20319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6293 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2988 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9315 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2070 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1360 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3928 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 448 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1574 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3656 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4155 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1846 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2219 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 15206 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2203 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3240 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (38) 11893 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2033 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 9262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 11257 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3912 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2608 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 20075 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2491 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 2472 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 5462 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 5506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1218 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1135 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5497 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 7784 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1857 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9558 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5177 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9429 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1239 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 3373825: paid2 (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3763 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3373858: n0nce (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (8) 6057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6924 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2387 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +43 / =0 / -0) (8393 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2676: casascius (Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust:  neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 11275: wariner (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 12089: piotr_n (Trust:  neutral) (447 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)



32. Post 66506566 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 23:07:20 CET 2026) in How do i prove that i am human?:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:47:11 PM
I'm just curious how you (or any AI transcriber) came to the conclusion that others might find your transmission of an AI-generated point of view interesting. At the same time, keep in mind that all, but absolutely all, members of this forum have equal or perhaps even more advanced access to the same AI tools.
So, what kind of unique idea will AI give you, but not me or anyone else?
I'm pretty sure that most people come here to exchange opinions with real humans because we all have bot thinking at our fingertips.
I am guessing that most people believe Artificial Intelligence is the closest thing we get to an All Knowing Entity.  Which if it was true would make things even more dubious.  Imagine I knew nothing about some subjects and all of a sudden I can speak all languages on this Forum, I can answer any question about any thing in detail et cetera.

If this was possible, we would probably not have much human interaction any more.  Every body would be addicted to this 'All Knowing' thing.  It is scary that we can clearly see people would be very excited to use it, even if it could lead to the worst change in human social behavior.

-----

Quote from: Lucius on Today at 03:20:53 PM
I don't know if it's just me, but before AI appeared, people were more creative, more social, more responsible - today things are starting to come down to who uses which AI model, who can do something faster, and who will ultimately present themselves to the world as more intelligent than others. I'm still on the method of using my brain, and when (if) it stops working I won't bother replacing it with an artificial one.
I have seen some people using Artificial Intelligence for very serious Law information they should have never asked any body else other than a real lawyer.  People are becoming REALLY stupid and are accepting another 'brain' to tell them what to think.  It is not just you.

And when you think about it.  The effort they put in finding a good enough Artificial Intelligence tool to create a good looking answer.  In taking the reply and arranging it to look closer to a human response.  It probably takes about the same time it would have taken to write their own thoughts instead.  Hell.  There are ways you can use Artificial Intelligence to even improve the quality of your Posts by finding more information, making sure it is real and pretty much increasing your knowledge with the help of it.  Although I would argue you could do the exact same thing and probably much better by 'asking' a Search Engine what ever doubts, questions and thoughts you may have.



33. Post 66505990 (unedited backup) (by b1ack) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 20:36:01 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: AakZaki on March 11, 2026, 06:48:51 PM
I waited almost two hours for this transaction that finally failed, I don't think this SOL Liquidity is really worth using. when I make a Liquidity transaction has 1000$ and I only make a 50$ transaction, I think it will work until a message like this appears in the UI:

Code:
Processing Exchange
Your SOL is being sent. Estimated time: ~1 min.

Processing
Your deposit is confirmed! We're now processing your DAI-ERC20 → SOL swap.

This usually takes just a moment. Your SOL will be on its way shortly.



But after almost two hours the transaction failed, the platform said it would be refunded and then I entered my DAI address, but what I received was 46.07 DAI. Ridiculous, isn't it?
I have lost 4 DAI after a long wait and the transaction was not processed.


But after a few minutes I received another 3.96 DAI at my address, did you send it again? If so, it should be. But why did you make two transactions of 46.07 + 3.96 DAI? Why not send a whole 50 DAI?
Considering that the transaction is refunded,

We have already mentioned that Solana swaps are currently in beta.
We experienced some issues with gas fees, which resulted in a loss of 4 DAI on your end. We detected this and issued a full refund within 2 hours.
We're sorry to hear you're still unhappy despite receiving the refund — we understand how frustrating unexpected issues can be.
Due to these ongoing issues, we temporarily disabled Solana yesterday. Our team is actively working on a fix, and the feature will be back up shortly.
We appreciate your patience and understanding.



Quote from: crwth on Today at 01:17:53 AM
Because of b1exch, I got to use USDT TRC20. I didn't know that TRX has so many fees to deal with. The energy and the cost of transacting USDT. I regret having to swap USDT. I might just get more, then transact once, and get rid of the USDT TRX I have. I think it's better to have USDT on a different chain. This is so expensive  Shocked
That's something to consider when using non-custodial wallet for usdt trc20, that's why i only used usdt to received on cex platform even though there are risks to consider but since it is considered as centralized by nature, so im risking using it on cex transacting or using instant swap exchange like b1exch and sometimes cce.
That's the ideal approach. Now I know. Now I have to buy TRX, then transfer it to my wallet  Angry. I just need to trade those pairs to increase the trading pairs I have in the competition.  Grin

We understand this is causing a lot of inconvenience, and we sincerely apologize for that. We are working hard behind the scenes and will be bringing some exciting updates to our users very soon.

Quote from: SamReomo on March 12, 2026, 11:46:52 PM
I agree, it works way faster now.  I hope the new type of protection does help in an eventual future attack.  So far, it is actually one of the few No Java Script adapted websites I used that work well and do not require a couple reloads to finally load up or to show the requested information.
I believe their protection is quite good and it'll be much helpful to block any future attacks and at the same time users of the site won't face any issues even it's attacked once again by those people who're against privacy. The b1exch team has done their best and just like you, everyone else is happy to visit the site without those CloudFlare delays and without Java script. Thumbs up for b1exch for such a great alternative of CloudFlare.
Quote from: PrivacyG on March 12, 2026, 10:00:48 PM
I've visited the site multiple times since last week and to be honest the new in house DDoS protection system of b1exch is far better than cloudflare's protection because in the b1exch's new DDoS protection system a user can visit the site much faster and I've never faced those delays that happen on sites having cloudflare protection.
I agree, it works way faster now.  I hope the new type of protection does help in an eventual future attack.  So far, it is actually one of the few No Java Script adapted websites I used that work well and do not require a couple reloads to finally load up or to show the requested information.

-----

Another crazy month has flown by.  Shocked

Our Monero reserves currently stand at 9,372 XMR ($3,283,612). ✅

We expect the reserve to decrease slightly depending on swap demand for other trading pairs.
This sounds great.  Considering the amount of detailed work done in favor of customers and the user experience we get, I am hoping this gets to be one of the Exchanges to last for a very long time.

To be transparent with our community — we are currently experiencing DDoS attacks on both our clearnet and Tor services. However, our anti-DDoS systems are holding strong, and the attackers are clearly losing momentum.
Tor can only be taken down if the attack is powerful enough to destabilize the entire Tor network itself, which is extremely unlikely.
As for clearnet — even if attackers manage to bring us down temporarily, we will patch every vulnerability they expose, and each attempt will only make our infrastructure stronger.
We appreciate your patience and continued support.


Quote from: examplens on March 12, 2026, 02:23:56 PM
Another crazy month has flown by.  Shocked

Our Monero reserves currently stand at 9,372 XMR ($3,283,612). ✅

We expect the reserve to decrease slightly depending on swap demand for other trading pairs.

This is quite interesting. I would rather say that XMR reserves will start to decrease if the price of Monero is in the green for several days in a row.
It is good that you have enough funds in reserves, so other swap pairs do not suffer such a concentration in one coin.

btw. How demanding is it, and is it in the offing to add USDC, at least on one network? The recent MiCA regulation should have limited EU users from using USDT. Although I'm not sure how consistent it all is.

We are working on USDC-ERC20 .

Quote from: crwth on March 12, 2026, 01:46:15 AM
I waited almost two hours for this transaction that finally failed, I don't think this SOL Liquidity is really worth using. when I make a Liquidity transaction has 1000$ and I only make a 50$ transaction, I think it will work until a message like this appears in the UI:
I remember reading that this was in a kind of beta test or something. I want to try to trade it as well.



@b1ack Would it be possible to trade more SOL now, given the testing that was done, or is it still not enough to say it's stable? I kept experiencing slow site performance, possibly because the same trading pair was being quoted by other people. Or it's just because liquidity is low?
(I'm just thinking out loud)

Solana will be back online soon. Rather than launching with large liquidity right away, we will scale based on demand. Once we have confirmed that our nodes are stable and secure, you can expect up to $100,000 in available liquidity within the first few weeks.
For larger swaps, please don't worry — we will process them within 2 to 6 hours, as our team monitors the exchange 24/7.



34. Post 66504968 (unedited backup) (by seoincorporation) (scraped on Fri Mar 13 15:48:13 CET 2026) in How do i prove that i am human?:

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:45:20 AM

@OP: here's a challenge for you: how about you report 42 chatbot verbal diarrhae spammers and get them banned? And not just newbies, that's easy. Find and report the Member+ Ranks who do this. It will give you some understanding of the effort put into cleaning the spam from Bitcointalk.
If you can list 42 "AI" spammers that you got banned, I'll add another neutral tag saying you made amends in my opinion Smiley


Challenge accepted, not sure if i will be able to do it, but u will try it.  Smiley

Quote from: Lucius on Today at 02:11:42 PM
~snip~
I undestand the fact that BitcoinTalk isn't against AI, the forum is against the abuse. If we let the AI write our post then we will be Nucked, but we can always get good ideas from AI and write a post with our own words and style, and that will be fine because the post wasn't just a copy paste. Even some promotional Threads are fully made with AI looking for the best design.


You fall from one trap into another completely pointlessly, because if the AI ​​created your problem, then why do you think it should give you an idea for your next post? In other words, do you think it's okay for AI to generate content for you that you will then refine a bit and present as your idea?

No matter how much you look for a justification for what you described, you cannot find it - if you need AI to create something on the forum, then it makes no sense to present yourself as a human.

Is not about always using the AI backup to generate ideas, but we can use AI to understand complex topics or to get more context on our original idea.

AI is a really powerful tool, personally i use it for business automation and vive coding. We can build crazy stuff and we can do it fast. I'm not saying AI is good or bad, is just another tech tool, and we must learn to use it wisely.

By the way, i see some cool names like notocactus yahoo62278 NotATether examplens, and i want to say thanks for your comments guys.



35. Post 66503001 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 23:54:43 CET 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:38:54 PM
First: CCE Cash is a cheap swap platform compared to its competitors, I spent about 13$ on a 2900$ transaction.
I know CCE.Cash recently lowered its fees further, which supports your math. $60 profit on $2900 is about ~2%, some exchanges have that much fee.
AakZaki is quite smart to be honest, $13 is nothing in fees when you get chance to occupy most number of slots in a raffle to win $60 easily and since he said it himself that he's a trader and that means he can easily make that $13 back and make some profit from trading and plus $60 free money of the raffle. AakZaki good job my friend, I wish you best of luck and hope to see you winning more of such raffles. Congratulations once again!



36. Post 66502617 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 22:16:07 CET 2026) in hitBTC, give me my money back! Immediately!:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 05:57:39 PM
I have noticed this along the years when hitbtc was one of the most popular exchanges in mid 2017 and beyond. As far as there were victims accusing the platform to be a confirmed scam, there was also many positive reviews from users confirming that they didn't have any issue with the platform (am one of those). The only explanation is that they are a selective scammers. The case with Elon Musk says everything.
Yes, they were popular when their competition was Tradesatoshi, Cryptopia, Etherdelta and similar.
I can't say that I had problems with them, but I remember that I left them a long time ago because they had obscenely high withdrawal fees. At the time it seemed to me that they didn't really want users to withdraw crypto from their platform. That's enough of a signal for me to stay away from them.
Quite the opposite, despite I had a great experience with hitbtc as it were the first exchanger to list new tokens from ICO based project, I left the platform after I noticed their fraudulent behavior to list shit coins for just a determined period in exchange for a listing fee depending on the period (I can't remember where I had seen this) without the token has any previous trading volume in dex (etherdelta and forkdelta at that time), and because the rise in the number of scam accusation made by users who had their balances frozen or blocked account access. In fact, I didn't notice that the platform is stil running as they don't run any promotion campaign anywhere.



37. Post 66502160 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 20:20:13 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Lock & unlock



Here are your predictions for round 8 :

   Name         Prediction      B/M   
   promise444c5          68 430,00         
   Pmalek            69 308,00         
   cryptofrka         69 700,00      1% p.malus   
   Leahized            69 785,00         
   ESG            70 000,00         
   Hypnotizer         70 065,56         
   examplens            70 066,00         
   Doan9269            70 360,00      0,50% p.malus   
   GazetaBitcoin         70 423,00         
   LoyceV            70 432,00         
   xLays                 71 067,00         
   Danydee         73 802,00         
   BABY SHOES         DNP      0,75% p.malus   
   LogitechMouse         DNP         
                     

Did not participate : BABY SHOES and LogitechMouse => -1 life => MIA



38. Post 66501393 (unedited backup) (by AakZaki) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 16:38:37 CET 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:38:54 PM
I assumed it was something like this, plus it's a bonus if they recognized the right pair.
I know CCE.Cash recently lowered its fees further, which supports your math. $60 profit on $2900 is about ~2%, some exchanges have that much fee.
Congratulations on winning. It was uncertain  Cheesy
Actually I'm still waiting for the second round if any, let alone a tag name When it starts. I will try to be at the forefront if it does exist. I don't think icopress or inspace would mind creating a tag name if a second round did exist.

To be honest, I really like CCECash which is cheap for its swap fees, I even thought why not CCECash held the competition. maybe it would be more interesting if CCECash held the competition and the possibility of participants would be much more, because of the consideration of the fee.



39. Post 66501253 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Thu Mar 12 15:48:01 CET 2026) in [ANN] bitcoindata.science:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:33:31 PM
Honestly, I'm not sure how realistic the CloudFlare statistics are, i.e., human traffic, they are quite different from G00gle analytics, for example. Certainly, these are good numbers for a small site.
During February, you had some kind of sudden drop. Do you have any idea what happened then?

I agree about cloudflare data being bigger than Google analytics and other services.

I have been tracking in other analytics as well, and there is am getting about 2500 unique visitors only. However,  i noticied that my own visits do not count because I use adblock and strict privacy settings in Firefox (even proxying the analytics it gets blocked somehow)

So I am sure I am having way more visits than 2500.

But, as i have seen many websites using cloudflare stats, I think they are OK to use and share too