examplens's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned examplens in the past 7 days

Quote from: examplens on July 21, 2026, 11:07:27 PM

Quote from: internetional on July 21, 2026, 06:57:46 PM

In the past, Bitfinex has already blocked withdrawals of my assets to addresses it considered high-risk. Other exchanges do this too. It is a pretty standard practice.

In my opinion, this is a big red flag that would make me look for an alternative.
Honestly, this is the first time I've heard of withdrawal blocks due to receiving addresses, so I'm pretty sure it's not industry standard practice. Maybe at Bitfinex but not at all others.

Bitfinex finally unlocked my withdrawals after holding my funds for over three weeks. Based on the outcome of the investigation, I can say for sure that b1exch had nothing to do with it. The suspicion was not caused by me trying to withdraw tokens to their address.

If the problem had been with that address, Bitfinex would have asked me at least one question about it. But there were no such questions. I received a lot of questions, but the ones concerning withdrawals only related to the transactions that I hadn't canceled at the time of the inquiry. The withdrawal to the b1exch address had already been canceled, and Bitfinex had no interest in it.

Apparently, I just had a lot of deposits into Bitfinex in various cryptocurrencies from different addresses, and a critical mass accumulated, after which Bitfinex put my account under review, requesting information on the source of funds for all incoming deposits.

By the way, the original source of one of these deposits was income from a b1exch signature campaign. I wrote Bitfinex about this, and it caused no difficulties or additional questions.

So, as of right now, Bitfinex definitely does not view interacting with b1exch as anything illicit.

Quote from: examplens on August 09, 2026, 09:50:13 PM

Quote from: Ale88 on August 09, 2026, 05:31:36 PM

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on August 09, 2026, 09:42:08 AM

I was quoting you two because you both seem to be waiting for some kind of miracle

I'm not waiting for a miracle, I just want him to publicly announce his decision regarding this matter. Of course he can do whatever he wants, but at least we get an answer since he kept saying he would defend himself and he would answer to all the questions.

No matter how bad the whole thing looks to him, he has a serious opportunity to turn everything in his favor.

I sense manipulation Tongue

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:04:27 PM

Quote from: hulkyjamkal on Today at 09:37:16 PM

...

Once again, when an exchanger wants to be listed on Bestchange, it will do everything necessary in detail to meet the conditions. After being listed, the same exchanger slowly changes the conditions or possibly operates outside of its own rules. Certainly, BC does not necessarily have to have influence or insight into the business so that on that basis you consider them responsible for changing the ToS of an exchanger.
Many here blame BC when something goes wrong, even though none of you has done the basic research. Well, in this thread alone, many recognised shortcomings are presented, but it seems that no one reads it

Did you actually read my message in full? The exchanger has repeatedly violated its own rules, BestChange's rules, and the law — and BestChange is fully aware of this. No action has been taken by BestChange against the exchanger, so do you genuinely believe BestChange isn't at fault here either? I'll even entertain the idea that the official registration badge on the exchanger somehow appeared by accident and then somehow disappeared by accident (though in reality it didn't — see BestChange's own FAQ on what these badges mean), but the fact that BestChange allows this specific exchanger to keep breaking its rules is something I simply cannot explain any other way, because in effect they are covering for a fraudulent exchange operation.

A quick note: the badge FAQ explicitly says exchangers with the additional-check and official-registration icons have "the highest level of reliability" — which is exactly the point that makes an appearing-then-vanishing badge on a rule-breaking exchanger so hard to write off as coincidence. https://www.bestchange.com/faq.html

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:53:02 PM

Quote from: hulkyjamkal on Today at 07:19:54 PM

...

You mixed up some things here. Bestchange cannot be responsible for any third-party platform listed on their aggregator. At no point does BC control the terms of exchange, and from that point of view you cannot blame them for anything.
Another thing is that their catalogue includes some dishonest exchanges, but that is a completely different matter.
The next thing is that you, as a user, did not do further research, but simply trusted the results that the BC search shows, and that is always a problem. There is no intermediary platform that will give you the most accurate insight into an exchange

At the time I made my exchange, BestChange indicated that this particular exchanger had official registration, which creates a sense of trust among users. Now that a problem has arisen, this badge has disappeared. I believe this constitutes direct deception, specifically on the part of BestChange, because they claim to carry out verification before adding exchangers to the platform.

Furthermore, the exchanger’s rules state that it bears no responsibility whatsoever toward its customers. Exchangers like this should not be listed on BestChange at all. For example, imagine that you paid for a car, but the dealer included a clause in the contract stating that they bear no responsibility and may choose not to deliver the car you purchased. In any court, such an offer or contract would be declared legally invalid from the moment it was concluded, and acceptance of the offer would be annulled. It would not matter that I personally checked a box confirming that I agreed to those rules. And it’s not just this one issue—the rules as a whole are structured in this way and are essentially semi-fraudulent.

Nevertheless, BestChange insisted otherwise, and I began doing what I was instructed to do. Yet, in an analogous situation—when the exchanger violated the law, its own rules, and BestChange’s rules—BestChange itself took no action whatsoever. I believe this also says a great deal about BestChange itself.

And I fully acknowledge that this is ultimately my responsibility. However, I used BestChange when choosing this exchanger, and BestChange chose to defend this fraudulent exchanger despite its objectively documented violations of BestChange’s own rules. And BestChange publicly states that exchangers are thoroughly checked before being listed and that the platform continuously monitors their compliance with their obligations.

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on Today at 11:55:36 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:04:19 AM

Yesterday I received a notification from your ANN thread, so it caught my attention and honestly, it seems to me that you are playing on thin ice. Some reference links could be considered a violation of mixer ban rules. (I think I drew your attention to that earlier). I advise you to revise it or at least talk to theymos about it.
You yourself know that there are many members who would be happy to start a new drama against you, and it would probably be good for your health and the health of your business if you solved it preventively

I understand what you mean now. Yes, you are correct and taking care of it in a few hours.

Be careful with the links... Wink

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:04:19 AM

Yesterday I received a notification from your ANN thread, so it caught my attention and honestly, it seems to me that you are playing on thin ice. Some reference links could be considered a violation of mixer ban rules. (I think I drew your attention to that earlier). I advise you to revise it or at least talk to theymos about it.
You yourself know that there are many members who would be happy to start a new drama against you, and it would probably be good for your health and the health of your business if you solved it preventively

I understand what you mean now. Yes, you are correct and taking care of it in a few hours.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:02:56 AM

I haven't followed the whole case in detail, but is there even any clear evidence that the Lazarus group is behind the hack?

Bybit is being assisted in this matter by the blockchain analysis firm TRMLabs. The identification method used for other cases involving this group was the same, the process relies entirely on blockchain analysis.

Quote from: Ale88 on Today at 08:39:23 AM

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on Today at 08:31:50 AM

Quote from: Ale88 on August 08, 2026, 05:34:40 PM

Quote from: examplens on August 08, 2026, 10:47:37 AM

for my tag, I'm waiting for your reaction and how you're going to solve the matter with your unfair win at the contest.

Same for me. I'm still waiting for an answer about the Pizza Contest prize he wasn't supposed to receive, and if I/we don't receive a clear answer regarding this matter, and if the prize is not return, I'm going to leave a red trust too.

I’ll bet 0.01 bitcoin that he won’t give the money back. Does anyone want to bet that he will?

I’m simply waiting for CryptoYar comment, I’d like him to publicly announce whether he is going to return the prize or not.
It’s a very simple question that has been asked several times, ignoring it will simply bring more negative tags, he’s supposed to know that.

I was quoting you two because you both seem to be waiting for some kind of miracle but the bet is open to anyone who wants to take it up. Also, I’ve chosen the amount carefully, as he’d have to pay back around 0.03 bitcoin; if I were to bet 0.04 bitcoin, it would be profitable for him or one of his alt accounts to accept the bet.

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on Today at 08:31:50 AM

Quote from: Ale88 on August 08, 2026, 05:34:40 PM

Quote from: examplens on August 08, 2026, 10:47:37 AM

for my tag, I'm waiting for your reaction and how you're going to solve the matter with your unfair win at the contest.

Same for me. I'm still waiting for an answer about the Pizza Contest prize he wasn't supposed to receive, and if I/we don't receive a clear answer regarding this matter, and if the prize is not return, I'm going to leave a red trust too.

I’ll bet 0.01 bitcoin that he won’t give the money back. Does anyone want to bet that he will?

I’m simply waiting for CryptoYar comment, I’d like him to publicly announce whether he is going to return the prize or not.
It’s a very simple question that has been asked several times, ignoring it will simply bring more negative tags, he’s supposed to know that.

Quote from: Ale88 on August 08, 2026, 05:34:40 PM

Quote from: examplens on August 08, 2026, 10:47:37 AM

for my tag, I'm waiting for your reaction and how you're going to solve the matter with your unfair win at the contest.

Same for me. I'm still waiting for an answer about the Pizza Contest prize he wasn't supposed to receive, and if I/we don't receive a clear answer regarding this matter, and if the prize is not return, I'm going to leave a red trust too.

I’ll bet 0.01 bitcoin that he won’t give the money back. Does anyone want to bet that he will?

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:51:31 PM

Man, this is the bitcointalk forum. Probably the most rational place for all Bitcoin and crypto users. Do you think the forum would have such a reputation if they fell for false accusations by a newcomer without any evidence. Of course, it should be noted that b1exch left 0.2 BTC in escrow. It is enough to maintain a healthy approach to all services and take risks within the escrow amount.

The total escrow balance on various forums (some as old as Bitcointalk) is 3.2 BTC.

In any case, don't feed the trolls; just report it to a mod so they can block the thread.

Haven't had time to contribute to this thread, but +1 for JollyGood for creating it. Also examplens for the investigation bringing public evidence to light.

Quote from: AakZaki on August 07, 2026, 07:50:44 PM

Quote from: Ale88 on August 07, 2026, 03:36:10 PM

What is he missing at this point? Plagiarism maybe? After that he got 'em all.

What they are lacking at the moment is that they will no longer be as active in posting on this forum as they used to be. Because they are currently farming on the altcointalk forum and have been the second highest karma recipients in the last two months.

With those farm accounts, they seem to keep sharing regularly because the forum does not show who sent them.

source: https://pxzone.online/altt/karma-log?sort=karma_60_days

Fyi I did look into this when ThemePen specifically was climbing the ranks, I didn't flag with others as the karma was arriving from a variety of accounts in Urdu section, not just the other multi-accounts. It effectively looked very similar to other local sections where karma is very centralised (nothing wrong with that either, when it's not multi-accounts that is!). So it didn't follow the traditional pattern recognition I'm familiar with for multi-accounts, probably because there were other genuine users who were also distributing karma, so it blended in better. I'm not going to elaborate on what that is as have no intention to give tips to avoid detection here, only that it's clear that some farms think we aren't checking these things. Ayyway overall it was about half farm and half non-farm if not mistaken, or maybe 60/40. The other factor to consider is that users see a mod badge and instinctively give +1, that's probably why you see the gap between ThemePen and CryptoVar no doubt: 108 vs 68.

Either way, from altt perspective, it's near impossible to prove multi-accounts from karma interactions (unless the karma abuse is blatant), but it does contribute towards building a case and starting an investigation. The only exception is when it's negative karma being abused, because smiting sticks out like a sore thumb so is easy to detect. Everyone hates the fact the karma logs are hidden from public, but really, it's regularly been my secret weapon when I'm feeling analytical

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:47:37 AM

for my tag, I'm waiting for your reaction and how you're going to solve the matter with your unfair win at the contest.

Same for me. I'm still waiting for an answer about the Pizza Contest prize he wasn't supposed to receive, and if I/we don't receive a clear answer regarding this matter, and if the prize is not return, I'm going to leave a red trust too. I'm simply being patience at the moment and I'm going to wait a little more for these answers. If CryptoYar chooses to ignore them... Ok.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:47:37 AM

And I've already said it once, I'll say it again, for my tag, I'm waiting for your reaction and how you're going to solve the matter with your unfair win at the contest.

I wouldn't hold your breath for that.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 14973 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 10058 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4750 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (4) 9928 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6793 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8907 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2164 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6266 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2173 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 506 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1949 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 13785 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6776 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6909 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4443 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3963 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11398 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 12043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 534 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4533 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2869 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4661 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (62) 21386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 533583: Lucius (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 6660 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2126 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3878 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1360 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3660 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1313 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6889 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1991 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2328 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3605 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 13185 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1482 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2102 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10096 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2643 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3620 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11374 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 21130 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2981 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2601 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5754 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1606 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1901 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1609 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1885 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1604 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 946 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1288 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3599 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
96. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1020 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8826 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: examplens on August 05, 2026, 02:02:43 PM

If you removed the tags, he would certainly present it here as proof that it is not his fault.
So he claimed here that nothing discriminatory was found on the altt forum, although his request to remove the tag was rejected there. He only provoked me to make an observation with evidence from the pizza contest.
He still only partially answers the questions asked here. I'll wait for a while, maybe there will be an answer before I leave feedback.

Could you please clarify which specific questions you feel were only partially answered?

Regarding the Altcointalk forum, my thread was locked before I even had the chance to respond or present my side, so I could not carry the discussion further there.

I am still here, active, and willing to address any outstanding questions or concerns you have.

Fighting for my case does not mean I am begging but fighting with evidence. Regarding my PM I sent only one PM to JollyGood only. There was another PM sent to Don Pedro Dinero but before this thread. Otherwise, I did not send anyone any PM I will present my facts here and will ask them to review based on my facts presented here.

Quote from: PrivacyG on Today at 10:49:44 PM

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 10:52:12 PM

Following the whole drama surrounding the Coldcard wallet, one cannot help but wonder what the next step will be for the one who is currently managing the stolen Bitcoins. As one of the 100% no-kyc exchanges, b1exch could perhaps be misused to swap these coins, thus becoming a participant in money laundering.
Question to b1exch, do you have a scenario ready in such a case?
The Bybit hack greatly influenced the persecution of eXch and its subsequent closure, it would be really bad if a similar fate befell another no-kyc service

My opinion. b1exch would be put in a bad light by its own customers if they did have a scenario prepared against the Coldcard attacker. I would personally not visit them any more after this. Because according to their Terms no one will be traced, checked et cetera or treated in a different way,
...

Yes, and that's exactly how services like b1exch can end up on the radar of law enforcement. Once a platform is found to have processed or facilitated the movement of hacked or illicit funds, it gives authorities a stronger reason to investigate or even shut it down.
We've seen similar situations with mixers and exchanges that became associated with laundering stolen/hacked crypto. Even if a service isn't directly involved in the theft, repeatedly processing those funds can still attract regulatory scrutiny and legal action.

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 10:52:12 PM

Following the whole drama surrounding the Coldcard wallet, one cannot help but wonder what the next step will be for the one who is currently managing the stolen Bitcoins. As one of the 100% no-kyc exchanges, b1exch could perhaps be misused to swap these coins, thus becoming a participant in money laundering.
Question to b1exch, do you have a scenario ready in such a case?
The Bybit hack greatly influenced the persecution of eXch and its subsequent closure, it would be really bad if a similar fate befell another no-kyc service

My opinion. b1exch would be put in a bad light by its own customers if they did have a scenario prepared against the Coldcard attacker. I would personally not visit them any more after this. Because according to their Terms no one will be traced, checked et cetera or treated in a different way,

Quote

1. Service Overview

Bitcoin was not created to be surveilled. It was created to liberate. b1eXch exists to honour that original intent: to provide a space where people can transact freely, without interference, without observation, and without asking permission.

Quote

2. Eligibility

Any person may create and perform exchange operations on our service. We do not discriminate, impose identity verification, or maintain any rejection criteria based on nationality, geography, or personal characteristics.

We do not and cannot determine the identity or location of our users. No registration, email, phone number, or any other personally identifying information is required or collected.

b1eXch does not perform Know Your Customer (KYC) verification. b1eXch does not perform Anti-Money Laundering (AML) screening. b1eXch does not employ, integrate, or cooperate with any blockchain analytics, chain analysis, or transaction surveillance tools or providers.

Your transactions are yours. We do not score them, flag them, trace them, or share them. Every user is treated equally and unconditionally, regardless of the origin, destination, or history of their funds.

As seen here,
https://b1exch.to/Terms

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on August 03, 2026, 08:31:30 PM

An update worth including about boltz: they just announced that the platform will remain disabled until further notice (due to them being targeted by attackers):

https://x.com/i/status/2084311537502630319

Thanks, I added a warning note to their page.

Later on we'll have a better place to put updates about each service (e.g maintenances, new supported coins, etc...).

Quote from: examplens on August 04, 2026, 11:30:34 AM

Ninja, what do you think about the proposal that these /123 online /5 offline / unstable be linkable, where the link would lead to the page of the listed services that are in that group/tag. This especially applies to two groups (offline and unstable) when there are problems with the operation of a service.

I like the idea, so it has been added. Thanks for the suggestion! Cheesy

This is the PM he sent to me on 3rd August 2026:

Dear JollyGood,

I have been fighting this since day one, and I'm fighting because I have no connection with them. I will be replying in the main thread... I think ThemePen has made my case worst now... He's clearly close friend of Rustam and now they both are denying.

anyway I'm ready to give you anything proof you need to prove my identity. But I promise and swear I am not part of these farms. Even @examplens, who brought the evidence, did not tag me with red trust. I believe he has access to my IP logs on the Altcointalk forum and he knows that why my IP changed and when it changed, it changed before that case, and he knows I was not lying.

So this is a humble request: please remove the tag you can keep it neutral if you like until proven, since I have already given every detail from day one. If you remove it, I will also ask others to do the same, and I believe they will listen, since you are well respected among them. Thank you very much.

As you can see, he was mentioning your name as a reason why I should remove (or at the very least revise) my tag because he said you know he is not lying. I suppose he will use any tactic possible when trying to have his negative tags removed.

Quote from: examplens on August 05, 2026, 02:02:43 PM

If you removed the tags, he would certainly present it here as proof that it is not his fault.
So he claimed here that nothing discriminatory was found on the altt forum, although his request to remove the tag was rejected there. He only provoked me to make an observation with evidence from the pizza contest.
He still only partially answers the questions asked here. I'll wait for a while, maybe there will be an answer before I leave feedback.

Quote from: examplens on August 05, 2026, 05:15:16 PM

They issued a warrant canary today.
If we were to read between the lines, something completely different may be at stake. They may have been compromised in another way, but they are restricted from disclosing it.

Is there any official news regarding the whereabouts of the compromised Coldcard funds?
I'd like to read it.

You're probably thinking that it may be similar to what happened to eXch like some of the compromised funds have been swapped via Boltz and authorities are into them?
That's a valid and good reasoning but it needs some evidence to back it up.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 05:15:16 PM

They issued a warrant canary today.
If we were to read between the lines, something completely different may be at stake. They may have been compromised in another way, but they are restricted from disclosing it.

Compromised for what? Absolutely zero Coldcard funds went through Boltz or through the Lightning Networks and the service was closed for days.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:27:18 PM

Quote from: 0trace on Today at 10:33:55 AM

Yes, sure.
You can see the OrangeFren escrow amount on their main page, next to us.
https://orangefren.com/

Thank you for your question.

Ok, you need to make that clear and write it somewhere, with a note of all conditions of use of escrowed funds.
OrangeFren is reliable, and escrow on their platform is certainly a good thing, but forum users cannot count on this escrow, or anyone except OF users.

We immediately indicated in the main thread that the escrow is on OrangeFen and provided a link to it. If that's not enough, we can provide some additional information.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:59:09 AM

It may not be anything critical, but it could certainly be a warning.
These days, FixedFloat has changed its business jurisdiction from FFX Group Ltd (Republic of the Marshall Islands) to FFGX Group LLC (88 Avtomshenebeli Street, Kutaisi 4600, Georgia).
What is actually suspicious about the whole thing is that they did not announce this change anywhere, website, blog, social media (and it is certainly important). only updated their ToS.

By silently updating the Terms of Service (ToS), they hope nobody notices. If they get questioned later, they can just point to the ToS and say, "You agreed to these rules when you used the site," even if the rules changed while you were already using it.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:18:31 PM

The mixing of stolen coins with Coldcard has begun. It goes through Wasabiwallet, so it's not as sophisticated as one might have expected.
One part was swapped into ETH, which was later sent to Tornado Cash

Didnt coordenators from wasabi wallet blocked the funds? I thought they could do that.

Maybe a small part of the funds can stay undetect after using tornado cash.

We'd love for you to take part.

Code:

logfiles
AHOYBRAUSE
Daniel91
klarki
AakZaki
PX-Z
TryNinja
NeuroticFish
joker_josue
internetional
examplens
SFR10
rdluffy
ImGenius
knuckey
xandry
hugeblack
Forsyth Jones
OmegaStarScream
klarki
doggywin
crwth
dansus021
ArielRod20
zasad@
Skjadoon

Quote from:

If you would like your name to be removed from the list, please let me know.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:30:04 AM

Quote from: SageSwap on August 04, 2026, 06:51:19 PM

USDT (TRX) to XMR exchanges in AML mode have been suspended.

The high volume of USDT TRX transactions in this mode prevents us from processing them further; we will keep you updated!

USDT TRX TO XMR WORKS WITHOUT ANY ISSUES IN NORMAL SWAP MODE.

It may be a bit confusing that you say "AML mode" here, while on the website it is called "NO AML swap". It sounds like two opposite things.

Why don't you have any information on the website that a certain couple is currently suspended? As far as I can see, it is not even possible to select USDT (Tron) in (No) AML mode, but non-forum users do not have such information. Without it, you might be remembered as someone who doesn't have USDT (Tron) > XMR as an option at all

You're right, I mistakenly copied the previous version and just changed the name of the coin. Before, this feature was called “AML MODE” and now it's “NO AML MODE” so it can indeed be confusing. I've already edited the post, Thank you.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:37:38 AM

I'm trying to find more information about this $5000 escrow (written in the subject), but I can't, and it's a bit tiring to go through the whole thread. There is also nothing about it on the website.
Can you post a reference where a third party confirms escrowed funds for you?

Yes, sure.
You can see the OrangeFren escrow amount on their main page, next to us.
https://orangefren.com/

Thank you for your question.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 11:40:59 AM

I think he needs help with a decision so that people gradually forget his bad story.

He stated his fight to clear his name. I just do not see him doing anything proactive at all. The images in the Pizza Day competition were not a figment of our combined imaginations.

A very important component of this story is the fact he won $1500 and the ThemePen account was already a merit source therefore the chances of members forgetting anything (related to this matter) is highly unlikely.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:53:05 AM

The request to be a merit source is an additional rudeness, he obviously overestimated his plans to create a serious account farm. I did not see that he convinced anyone of his innocence

As of now, he has not made a compelling case at all yet believes he will clear his name. His merit source application became the primary reason for his current predicament.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:40:43 AM

Quote from: mikel_012 on July 31, 2026, 05:40:19 PM

Quote from: OrangeFren on July 31, 2026, 12:17:08 PM

Quote from: mikel_012 on July 30, 2026, 04:15:25 PM

And we know there is a lot of stolen and hacked money in all no kyc services, including with OrangeFren that has no kyc in many services when using their referral link. It is just how the world works let's not act innocent Grin

Truthfully I'm not aware of single hack that went through our links.

Even if there was it is better to not speak about this so let's change subject Grin

I am not saying this in a way to attack you, if we start choosing what to accept because of clean or dirty we will go back to KYC. And I also do not like when I need to send my docs to anonymous websites in the internet

Someone who doesn't know what it's about, and based on your first post, would think that Orangefren was launched as a plan to take a percentage from hacked and stolen coins through swap.
ISPs also had a part of the profits from the Internet connection that they sold to hackers, and they abused the connection, why does no one ever object to them for that?
At the same time, OF is only an aggregator, delivers information and has little influence on what happens in the backend of any listed exchanger with them.

Why so aggressive? I never said Orangefree was launched as a plan to take a percentage from hacked and stolen coins, please quote where I said this if you are this sure about my words Huh

I meant to say they can not block or track stolen coins because they are a privacy service that does not track or ask for KYC. And this is the same for any service with real privacy. And of course stolen coins will go through the service or through other no KYC services because this is useful for criminals just like for political fugitives or people that like privacy

Please try to be more respectful since I was never disrespectful to you before

Quote from: internetional on Today at 03:14:31 PM

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 10:52:12 PM

Following the whole drama surrounding the Coldcard wallet, one cannot help but wonder what the next step will be for the one who is currently managing the stolen Bitcoins. As one of the 100% no-kyc exchanges, b1exch could perhaps be misused to swap these coins, thus becoming a participant in money laundering.

I doubt that the heavily tracked coins will be sent to such swap services. I think it's unlikely that the thieves of such a massive amount would trust it to a service that gains full control over the cryptocurrency, even if only during the swap. For the thieves, the fact that b1eXch doesn’t collect user data shouldn’t be as important as the fact that b1eXch itself will have the technical capability to steal all those funds. If I were them, I would clean such a haul using atomic swaps.

Most the services called atomic swaps use thrid party centralized services to process bitcoin deposits.

I dont think they have many options to make those coins clean...

Quote from: Meoww on Today at 08:55:32 AM

I saw they have spot, futures, bots, copy trading and fiat options, but that does not really tell me much about real user experience.
Has anyone here actually used it?
Would appreciate honest feedback, good or bad.

Most CEXs offer pretty much the same features. Also, there are many well-known exchanges with better reputations and proven track records. What made you choose BYDFi?

Personally, I've never used it and I hadn't even heard of it before. According to this [[SOURCE]], BYDFi is not authorized by the FCA in the UK. That's a red flag, especially if you're looking for a regulated exchange.

Combined with what @examplens mentioned about some users' negative experiences on Reddit, I think those are enough warning signs to avoid this exchange and choose one of the many licensed exchanges with better reputations instead.

See this list: Top Exchanges.

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 10:52:12 PM

Following the whole drama surrounding the Coldcard wallet, one cannot help but wonder what the next step will be for the one who is currently managing the stolen Bitcoins. As one of the 100% no-kyc exchanges, b1exch could perhaps be misused to swap these coins, thus becoming a participant in money laundering.

I doubt that the heavily tracked coins will be sent to such swap services. I think it's unlikely that the thieves of such a massive amount would trust it to a service that gains full control over the cryptocurrency, even if only during the swap. For the thieves, the fact that b1eXch doesn’t collect user data shouldn’t be as important as the fact that b1eXch itself will have the technical capability to steal all those funds. If I were them, I would clean such a haul using atomic swaps.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:53:05 AM

[...]

I have been part of Bitcointalk since January 14, 2020, but I never joined the Pizza contest before this year. If those were all my alt accounts, why didn't I participate earlier? ThemePen, Rustam Meraj, and Publictalk792 have participated regularly, but I didn't. I only entered this time and did my best. Their pizzas didn't even make it to the top 10, which clearly shows that my entry was completely different from theirs.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:40:43 AM

Quote from: mikel_012 on July 31, 2026, 05:40:19 PM

Quote from: OrangeFren on July 31, 2026, 12:17:08 PM

Quote from: mikel_012 on July 30, 2026, 04:15:25 PM

And we know there is a lot of stolen and hacked money in all no kyc services, including with OrangeFren that has no kyc in many services when using their referral link. It is just how the world works let's not act innocent Grin

Truthfully I'm not aware of single hack that went through our links.

Even if there was it is better to not speak about this so let's change subject Grin

I am not saying this in a way to attack you, if we start choosing what to accept because of clean or dirty we will go back to KYC. And I also do not like when I need to send my docs to anonymous websites in the internet

Someone who doesn't know what it's about, and based on your first post, would think that Orangefren was launched as a plan to take a percentage from hacked and stolen coins through swap.
ISPs also had a part of the profits from the Internet connection that they sold to hackers, and they abused the connection, why does no one ever object to them for that?
At the same time, OF is only an aggregator, delivers information and has little influence on what happens in the backend of any listed exchanger with them.

Hah, no. OF was created, because I was frustrated that I manually had to check the rates from KYCNot.Me. It worked out well, because now we work with knm a lot and we're friends

Quote from: Alone055 on Today at 05:59:23 AM

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 11:29:24 PM

Do you track spam via OP_RETURN on the receiving address? People send Bitcoin to a hacker to send him a message. Huh

From threats of suicide, through begging, to offers of money laundering services

https://mempool.space/address/bc1qq85v2c926eg6pgxhwp6q7lf6cnsz80qs3fcu9r

Some of them are actually funny. Look at this one:

Lol

Anyway, since it was because of a security breach from their devices that caused people such big losses, shouldn't the owners, creators, developers, and all those involved in this be arrested and put through trials just like how SBF (Sam Bankman Fried) of FTX was arrested for fraud? And, let me just throw this thought out there, and I'm not blaming anyone or anything like that, but what are the chances that there is actually no external hacker or anything but it's all done from the inside? Just saying.

I also thought about this whole thing as being an inside job. Because, why would a company neglect security alert that they know is a threat to their reputation. They knew their security was weak yet they neglected the warnings and didn't even come out publicly to warn their users. Also, they have been quiet on how to recover the coins that has been stolen, they are not providing solutions. lastly, why is it only Coldcard that is being attacked?

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 11:29:24 PM

Do you track spam via OP_RETURN on the receiving address? People send Bitcoin to a hacker to send him a message. Huh

From threats of suicide, through begging, to offers of money laundering services

https://mempool.space/address/bc1qq85v2c926eg6pgxhwp6q7lf6cnsz80qs3fcu9r

Some of them are actually funny. Look at this one:

Lol

Anyway, since it was because of a security breach from their devices that caused people such big losses, shouldn't the owners, creators, developers, and all those involved in this be arrested and put through trials just like how SBF (Sam Bankman Fried) of FTX was arrested for fraud? And, let me just throw this thought out there, and I'm not blaming anyone or anything like that, but what are the chances that there is actually no external hacker or anything but it's all done from the inside? Just saying.

Quote from: examplens on August 03, 2026, 10:52:12 PM

Following the whole drama surrounding the Coldcard wallet, one cannot help but wonder what the next step will be for the one who is currently managing the stolen Bitcoins. As one of the 100% no-kyc exchanges, b1exch could perhaps be misused to swap these coins, thus becoming a participant in money laundering.
Question to b1exch, do you have a scenario ready in such a case?
The Bybit hack greatly influenced the persecution of eXch and its subsequent closure, it would be really bad if a similar fate befell another no-kyc service

Let's say they just block every address from a list connected to this hack. Can't the hackers just move the coins around, Coinjoin here and there, and swap from a different set of addresses? Or is b1exch going to screen every address and maybe even do a KYC check if anything bad is detected? Tongue

My point is: Sometimes you start controlling which coins are good and you won't just stop there.

Quote from: Italian Panic on Today at 07:42:31 AM

The attack is not ended, maybe another one hackers or hack team is on work to drain more BTC in people addresses.
At this point, we can safely say that Coldcard can be flushed down the toilet and we can move on to something else. I don’t think they wil regain the trust of their current and future customers.

Projected BTC drained count tell about:

Code:

[img height=400]https://talkimg.com/images/2026/08/03/UoI5wT.png[/img]

I'm in favor of bad companies going bankrupt, especially those that were negligent and had the chance to avoid this disaster (bug bounty, reverting to the GPL license). Let's see what happens.

Quote from: Stalker22 on Today at 10:13:39 PM

Quote from: kTimesG on Today at 09:20:59 PM

Compromised entropy = all derived wallet addresses are also compromised. So it is impossible to prove ownership when all the seeds are publicly known.

This is not necessarily true. As eaLiTy already said: The attacker (or whoever has the private keys of those addresses) cannot forge your entire historical transaction trail.

Unless I'm mistaken, technically you can prove you own the drained funds, as the seed was generated from the coldcard ID.
https://x.com/narcelio/status/2084303965202657304

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 11:10:54 AM

https://x.com/BTCsessions/status/2084024733511921691
The attackers have started draining wallets on Coldcard devices WITH passphrase. As per the tweet, it was a pretty simple passphrase (two extra words), but this shows the attack is active and they are searching everything. If you personally know any Coldcard user who feels safe with his "strong passphrase", it's best to reach them out as soon as possible.

cutthroat, even those who used passphrases used weak and predictable ones. People should use common sense before using advanced features and understand them masterfully. Below is a table showing the strength of each passphrase extension:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:29:24 PM

Do you track spam via OP_RETURN on the receiving address? People send Bitcoin to a hacker to send him a message. Huh

From threats of suicide, through begging, to offers of money laundering services

https://mempool.space/address/bc1qq85v2c926eg6pgxhwp6q7lf6cnsz80qs3fcu9r

It's one crook trying to outsmart another crook.

Guys, don't leave your houses while all tricksters are among each other. Grin