examplens's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned examplens in the past 7 days

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:05:26 AM

Quote from: changeum on January 20, 2026, 03:38:41 PM

Questions for the community:

Has anyone dealt with similar MetaMask blocklist situation?
Any ways to escalate this?
Is there any accountability for moderators who blocklist legitimate services without evidence?

Any advice appreciated. This is affecting our users who get phishing warnings when they shouldn't.

If there were several reports against you, you would certainly be added to the black list. I am not surprised if it is the work of the competition.

I remember @bitmover successfully contacted Metamask a couple of times regarding delisting from their blacklist. I mention him so that he would see this and pass on his experience.

Hello!

You need to go to their github and open an issue. I opened a few the past. You need to open the issue

https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues

You can use this template, that I used for jokermix
https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/101817

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 06:50:44 AM

Quote from: examplens on January 21, 2026, 03:04:23 PM

Uvek bilo, sto je ostrija poreska politika i visoki nameti, ljudi vise traze mogucnosti da to zaobidju. Jednostavno, cak i ako je nesto 99$k, mozes meni ili nekom vec "fiktivno" prodati za 1005$ i platiti porez samo na tih 5$ dobiti. Zvanicno si cist, a drzava neka se bahati sa svojih 1$ prihoda odatle.

/snip

Nemam puno znanja o porezima i kako Porezna uprava radi pa me zanima jedna stvar. Hipotetski slučaj (sličan ovome što si opisao) - početkom godine kupim Bitcoin za $90.000, na kraju godine cijena mu naraste na $125.000 ali ja ga nekome prodam za $91.000. Bi li Porezna priznala da platim porez na tih $1.000 zarade ili bi to smatrala poreznom prijevarom? Jer realno, na taj način svatko može izbjeći plaćanje poreza fiktivnim prodavanjem.

Kada prvi puta odeš u svoj lokalni porezni ured registriraš se u Registru poreznih obveznika.
Nakon toga dobiješ IBAN na koji trebaš uplaćivati 1 i 2. stup mirovinskog i porez na dobit (ako će ga biti) i to je otprilike to.
Ako imaš neka dodatna pitanja uputit će te da se javiš svojem knjigovođi ili poreznom savjetniku i reći da nije njihov posao da ti daju porezne savjete.
Tako, u tom hipotetskom slučaju, ti bi odnio joopd obrazac u poreznu ili ga predao preko e porezne, i uplatio porez koji misliš da trebaš uplatiti i to je to, nitko ti ništa ne bi rekao u tvom lokalnom poreznom uredu.
Oni samo zaprimaju porezne prijave i provjeravaju da li su sve šifre dobro ispunjene, i ti dobiješ na email potvrdu da ti je (tehnički) joopd obrazac ispravan i da je prošao u sustavu.
Dalje tvoj lokalni porezni ured nema nikakve veze s tim već središnjica porezne uprave, vjerojatno njihov odjel za porezne prevare ili porezni USKOK.
Oni pretražuju sve predane porezne prijave i po određenim kriterijima izdvajaju one ''sumnjive'' i šalju na dodatnu provjeru.
Ako smatraju da kod tvoje prijave sve ne štima ili ima ''sumnjivih elemenata'' javit će ti se za 2-3 mjeseca ili duže i zatražiti dodatnu dokumentaciju ili provjeru podataka.
U slučaju da otkriju nepravilnosti mogu ti odrediti naplatu dodatnog poreza.
Srećom, nikada nisam bio u toj situaciji a nadam se da i neću.

Quote from: examplens on January 21, 2026, 03:04:23 PM

Uvek bilo, sto je ostrija poreska politika i visoki nameti, ljudi vise traze mogucnosti da to zaobidju. Jednostavno, cak i ako je nesto 99$k, mozes meni ili nekom vec "fiktivno" prodati za 1005$ i platiti porez samo na tih 5$ dobiti. Zvanicno si cist, a drzava neka se bahati sa svojih 1$ prihoda odatle.

/snip

Nemam puno znanja o porezima i kako Porezna uprava radi pa me zanima jedna stvar. Hipotetski slučaj (sličan ovome što si opisao) - početkom godine kupim Bitcoin za $90.000, na kraju godine cijena mu naraste na $125.000 ali ja ga nekome prodam za $91.000. Bi li Porezna priznala da platim porez na tih $1.000 zarade ili bi to smatrala poreznom prijevarom? Jer realno, na taj način svatko može izbjeći plaćanje poreza fiktivnim prodavanjem.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:14:24 PM

I logged into my account.
Here's a new update I came across, it's over. freebitco.in is shutting down.
It is obviously recommended not to deposit any coins there.

after few years with a lot of accusation, the legends now come to an end, before I'm joined this forum I remember I joined FreeBitco.in first to claim their satoshi faucet. I wish they are keep their promise to pay all user balance before fully shutting down. before it happens, freebitco.in support must be active here till all process is done. but I don't know if they are run away before it happens (hopfully I'm wrong).

Quote from: buwaytress on January 17, 2026, 12:35:49 AM

Have to say, almost miss the pure degeneracy I used to see only on the original dice site chat rooms.

dice days were the best days, things were much simpler without all the nonsense we have today.

Quote from: buwaytress on January 17, 2026, 12:35:49 AM

@Zwei I've come to understand you have to give a lot to take some haha. I loved dice and its community for example, and learnt later to take the shit that came with it. I'm guessing you like the Andrew Tate thing almost as much as that Copenhagen thing you mentioned?

yeah, but tbh, i don't really care who they sponsor, but sponsoring tate was stupid, it was guaranteed to backfire since Tate is a scammer and a piece of shit. but i guess that how marketing works these days, at least we got to see funny stuff like this:

duct taping "fuck duel.com" to your ass on a duel.com sposored event is something else, lol

and all the other memes, and Tate lost.

Quote from: examplens on January 19, 2026, 10:09:58 AM

Why do they insist on returning to the old account when they can create a new one very quickly?
Also, they should separate different accounts, one official for Duel.com needs, and the other for Monarch, which will be free for everything he wants to say.

he did create a new personal account @ossiketola_, but the account got suspended after a few days.

Quote from: examplens on January 19, 2026, 10:09:58 AM

If the competition paid for the ban (I didn't know something like this was possible), doesn't he have enough money to do the opposite and pay for the unban?

maybe he already tried doing that. from his last update on this, no one at twitter wants to talk to him, even support doesn't reply to him.
and want to know the crazy part? he is going thru all this even after he bought the @duel handle from twitter for $300k.

Quote from: examplens on January 19, 2026, 11:35:49 AM

For example, they do not work with their liquidity funds because there are cases where blocked funds were reported by their liquidity provider.
Check here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569655.0

When we add to this the case where the user was get 100% stolen coins from them, which were subsequently frozen by a third party, we have to admit that this is quite arrogant and irresponsible behavior on the part of Exolix.

Also, this "Guaranteed never-KYC regardless for our users only" is very questionable and can lead to deception because it seems that you are participating in their illegal seizure of coins.
I mean, what is the difference in tainted coins if they go through the Orangefren referral link? Respect for your deal and the way you run your business, but the selective treatment of coins in this case gives a very negative image of Exolix exchanger.

Were there cases where Exolix blocked funds of customers?

I am just aware of the case you mentioned, of Exolix sending stolen coins to a user.

According to the description in OrangeFren, Exolix should have refunded the stolen coins, not given that coins to another customer.

Quote from: examplens on January 20, 2026, 10:51:39 PM

/snip
Negde bi svi trebali biti zadovoljni jer neki projekat zeli biti prisutan ovde, cini se da smo ipak skrenuli paznju na ovaj lokal. Rikafip-ove analize aktivnosti Hrvatskog lokala pokazuju neke brjeve koji su ocigledno nesto bolji od proseka.

Naša lokalna sekcija možda nema aktivnost kao neke druge sekcije gdje ima više članova, ali isto tako nema gotovo uopće spama i glupih rasprava. Valjda se zbog toga sviđa ekipi koja plaća reklame za svoje projekte. Recimo u mojoj kampanji aktivnost u Gambling sekciji nije presudna i mislim da sam mjesto u kampanji dobio prvenstveno zbog naše sekcije jer u Gamblingu pišem puno manje nego ovdje.

Quote from: examplens on January 20, 2026, 10:51:39 PM

/snip
Kako su prave no-KYC menjacnice postale pravi raritet, nije neobicno da menjacnica poput cce.cash dobro posluje. Nadam se samo da nece skrenuti paznju na sebe nezeljenim korisnicima, sto im moze samo zakomplikovati rad.

Pretpostavljam da će se trend smanjenja non-KYC mjenjačnica samo povećavati jer je sigurno vlasnicima puno lakše udovoljavati regulatorima nego se boriti protiv njih. Naravno da to nama korisnicima ne ide na ruku, ali mislim da tu ne možemo ništa. Mene kod ovakvih mjenjačnica (tu ne mislim na CCE.Cash jer ju nisam koristio nego govorim općenito) uvijek strah mijenjati veći iznos jer još uvijek imam traume od miksera koji su bili super dok netko nije pokušao miksati veću količinu BTC-a.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:10:26 AM

Mislim da bi imalo smisla izbaciti link za Hrvatski lokal iz OP-a jer kad otvoriš temu, već si tu. Ne treba ti link za nju. A pogotovo što link i ne vodi na ovu temu nego na početnu stranicu na Bitcointalk. Koliko vidim, slična je situacija i sa glavnom temom na engleskom jeziku. Linkovi za Indonezijski, Portugalski i Talijanski su ok dok ostali preusmjeravaju korisnika na početnu Bitcointalk.org stranicu. Ili im ti prevodi još nisu finalizirani ili su zaboravili da promjene OP i stave prave linkove.

Mislim da su definitivno zaboravili da urade update i da stave prave linkove jer je meni bila slicna situacija sa drugom menjacnicom kada sam uradio prevod. Update su posle nedelju dana,tako da bi to trebalo nagalsiti u ANN temi,ili ce examplens to resiti sa njima.Inace da li je neko koristio menjacnicu? Kako vam se cini? Duze vreme su tu,i deluje mi da im dobro ide

Quote from: examplens on January 19, 2026, 11:35:49 AM

I think you should revise the information for the Exolix exchange. Obviously, some of the very important ones are incorrect

For example, they do not work with their liquidity funds because there are cases where blocked funds were reported by their liquidity provider.
Check here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569655.0

When we add to this the case where the user was get 100% stolen coins from them, which were subsequently frozen by a third party, we have to admit that this is quite arrogant and irresponsible behavior on the part of Exolix.

Also, this "Guaranteed never-KYC regardless for our users only" is very questionable and can lead to deception because it seems that you are participating in their illegal seizure of coins.
I mean, what is the difference in tainted coins if they go through the Orangefren referral link? Respect for your deal and the way you run your business, but the selective treatment of coins in this case gives a very negative image of Exolix exchanger.

Funds going through our link get a different (usually worse) exchange rate, but these swaps are done using Exolix's own liquidity. This allows them to offer a guarantee of never demanding KYC and instead refunding funds if they don't like them.

If there was a situation wherein our user had the coins he received from Exolix be frozen then we would demand that Exolix replace these coins or otherwise refund him and if they were to decline doing so we would use their security deposit held as part of the OrangeFren Guarantee for the same purpose.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:09:58 AM

Why do they insist on returning to the old account when they can create a new one very quickly?
Also, they should separate different accounts, one official for Duel.com needs, and the other for Monarch, which will be free for everything he wants to say.
If the competition paid for the ban (I didn't know something like this was possible), doesn't he have enough money to do the opposite and pay for the unban?

Probably for the same reason someone banned from bitcointalk can't create a new account: Ban evading is a thing... Tongue

I'm not sure if it's as easy as doing an auction to see if your account is staying banned or not. Cheesy

Quote from: tokeweed on Today at 12:25:29 PM

As I said... Theatre of dreams. Lolol. Cheesy

But yeah, a friend of mine says it's kinda also Guardiola's fault as he's over tweaking the squad again and using the wrong players? Dunno tho. I didn't watch the match so I can't add anything.

So wait, Carrick was already in charge against City? Damn... That's a nice win.

The attackers were the same as before except for Semenyo and little tweaking at the back due to injuries but they won 10-1 with the same lineup few days before the game. No excuse

Yes Carrick took over from Fletcher to see the team through the season. He's back.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:34:45 PM

The first clip I found, and there are as many similar compilations as you want. I follow the Man United subreddit, and they often post Rashford's "effort" there, even in Barcelona.
I really hope that Barcelona will somehow find the money to buy him in the end. He scored many goals. I would like him not to return to MU.

Bacelona are broke, he's likely going to return home now that Amorim is gone and done for. He's not getting enough attention up there - poor TV rights.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:05:22 AM

Yesterday, he entered the game in the 63rd minute. Roll Eyes

Look at the whole season, very few games he played all 90'.
He wasn't even a starter at Aston Villa when he was on loan.

Imagine Rooney playing like Rash; https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JOq9sO7rO0A

Of course, there is no disputing that he is talented, but he is lazy. Plus, he missed so many 100% chances that he had to finish routinely.

In modern football, you don't have enough comfort to have players jogging during the match. Imagine what it would look like in Liverpool's prime, when they played the most serious pressing.

It's hard to believe now, but PSG was after Rashford, United were forced to extend Rashford's contract on the player's terms, giving him a higher salary, and ironically, this was the end of Rashford. I don’t remember exactly whether he was injured or not, but after receiving a fat contract, Rashford stopped trying and quickly regressed. Even though he had unlimited credit from Ten Hag. It seemed that he wanted to prove himself at Aston Villa, then at Barcelona, but none of the clubs are betting on him, which says a lot.

Quote from: examplens on December 22, 2025, 02:51:10 PM

This service cannot be said to be a highly popular and trusted platform for monitoring. At least not for the market outside the RU area.
Additionally, this listing should not be presented as confirmation of reliability, transparency, or quality standards, as their primary motive is to earn something through the affiliate program, potentially.

It is certainly good progress for you to be present on as many similar aggregators as possible, but this case is not a measure of quality and reliability, so don't present it that way.

TouchPay is an exchange that holds all government-recognized licenses in Somalia. We also operates with physical offices in Kenya and Egypt.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:05:22 AM

Yesterday, he entered the game in the 63rd minute. Roll Eyes

Look at the whole season, very few games he played all 90'.
He wasn't even a starter at Aston Villa when he was on loan.

Imagine Rooney playing like Rash; https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JOq9sO7rO0A

You brought a few seconds clip from his PL game last season when the whole team was in a shit hole, not disputing facts that's he's not good defensively but he's not as lazy as you think - he's an attacker for goodness sake Grin

I want clips from Bacelona.

7 goals and 11 assists from someone without 90' football is pretty decent, that's more contributions than Saka and Palmer this season.

Quote

In modern football, you don't have enough comfort to have players jogging during the match. Imagine what it would look like in Liverpool's prime, when they played the most serious pressing.

This is true, none of the players we have would've survived in that era - ALOT is lacking in today's football world.

Quote from: examplens on January 18, 2026, 11:20:04 PM

Jel moguce u Hrvatskoj imati mobilni broj bez verifikacije?
Kod nas je to nemoguce od prosle godine, a ako sam dobro razumeo to je u skladu sa nekakvim EU propisima, pa je praktično bila obaveza verifikacije/registracije svakog pripejd broja.

Na Telegramu me kontaktira izvesni/a Zala Jurić, nudeci ociglednu scam šemu a da pri tom nije čak ni sakrio broj telefona. Koliko vidim u pitanju je HR broj iz A1 mreže. Moguće da je neka AI šema, mada je konverzacijski prilično precizan, odnosno nema onih klasičnih translate grešaka, mada ne bih bio iznenađen da je neki naivac uložio novac, pa pokušava povući još nekog za sobom zarad malo referal profita.

4% zarade na 24h, deluje prilično legit, zar ne? Roll Eyes

Ime mi je izgledalo poznato, pasam pogledao Telegram, ista osoba (@Zala482) je i mene kontaktirala. Vjerojatno je preko drugog accounts clan neke domace kripto grupe pa sa ovim accountom salje "ponude".

Sto se tice kupnje broja bez veeifikacije, mislim da je to i dalje moguce, ja imam sve neverificirane brojeve na bonove i nikada me nitko nije tražio verifikaciju...

Quote from: cryptofrka on January 18, 2026, 08:25:14 PM

Quote from: examplens on January 16, 2026, 01:42:30 PM

I dalje je glavni problem tih AML provera sto svaki servis moze imati neki svoj nacin.

Da, jasno. I to je pak totalno sranje.
Taman misliš da si očistio sve i da je kako treba i promijene se nekakva 2 parametra koja se gledaju i ajmo sve ispočetka.

Generalno gledano, sama ideja 'tainted' Bitcoina mi je apsurdna. A jedna od glavnih prednosti Bitcoina je to što ne podliježe vladama, regulativama i nema helpdesk broj na koji zoveš jer s nečim nisi zadovoljan.
Nadam se da će takav i ostati, makar to značilo da će par hakera ili kriminalaca lakše oprati neku lovu.

To se nadamo svi ali dugoročno nisam optimist.
U početku nikoga nije zanimao btc (ni kripto) ali malo po malo, svaki novi dan vidimo sve više novih pravila i restrikcija za obične korisnike.
Prvo su se uvele obveze prijave kriptovaluta poreznoj i plaćanja poreza, pa sada postaje sve teže provući kripto kroz mjenjačnice ili na btc bankomatu bez predavanja osobnih dokumenata...
Naravno, uvijek možemo reći da ćemo kripto držati na svom walletu i da ga ne želimo nigdje prijavljivati, ali jednom ipak želimo nešto napraviti s tim kriptom, kupiti novi auto, kuću, uplatiti za ljetovanje itd.
Zapravo, trenutni porezni zakoni, barem kod nas, su sasvim u redu jer ako si držao svoj kripto 2 godine ne moraš plaćati nikakav porez, samo prijaviti prihod preko joopd obrasca i dalje trošiš svoja kripto sredstva kako želiš (isto kao i dobit od dionica) što je sasvim ok i korektno od strane države.

Quote from: examplens on January 18, 2026, 11:20:04 PM

Jel moguce u Hrvatskoj imati mobilni broj bez verifikacije?
Kod nas je to nemoguce od prosle godine, a ako sam dobro razumeo to je u skladu sa nekakvim EU propisima, pa je praktično bila obaveza verifikacije/registracije svakog pripejd broja.

Koliko ja znam je. Naravno ne pretplata ali bonovi bi trebali raditi bez problema. Mogao si kupiti takve kartice na kiosku ili pošti s lovom već na njima. I to po principu košta koliko love dobiješ na kartici.

Nisam već dugo probao, ali kratko google istraživanje kaze da bonbon još uvijek ima taj princip. Mozda su top operateri ukinuli.

Quote from: examplens on January 18, 2026, 11:43:07 PM

I wouldn't take Rashford as a special parameter. I would rather say that it's a good thing that he left. How good a game-changer he is is shown by the fact that he is not a constant starter even in Barcelona. His laziness without contributing to defense is undesirable for the team, especially in the PL, where it is obviously one less player on the pitch.

I haven't been watching Bacelona games recently, but I watched him start and play vital part in most of their games last season, and saying that he's lazy and can't survive in the PL is strange - this is someone who tore the league apart in his early 20s.

We've seen players like Hazard, Mata, Silva with zero defensive contributions conquered the league - just saying.

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 12:39:54 AM

The fans should be heard. Chelsea should be looking to engage with their fans and if the majority consensus is they want Clearlake out then someone from the board has to take the initiative to get them out. If the fans want Boehly to have full control they have to do something about it. I think protesting before home games is hardly going to change anything, they should formulate a strategy.

Apparently they want the boards out - clearlake are the majority share owners so they're literally the owners. There have been protests since Enzo the Mascara was sacked.

Quote from: igebotz on January 18, 2026, 07:57:45 PM

Clearlake should sell their shares to Todd Beohley to run the club- we want them out of the club, they can't sell the club till after 10 years but can sell their shares to some other owners. We were alot better when Todd was running business and signing experienced players not some random kids to milk profits. That's the only positive change that we need.

The fans should be heard. Chelsea should be looking to engage with their fans and if the majority consensus is they want Clearlake out then someone from the board has to take the initiative to get them out. If the fans want Boehly to have full control they have to do something about it. I think protesting before home games is hardly going to change anything, they should formulate a strategy.

Quote from: examplens on January 18, 2026, 11:43:07 PM

I wouldn't take Rashford as a special parameter. I would rather say that it's a good thing that he left. How good a game-changer he is is shown by the fact that he is not a constant starter even in Barcelona. His laziness without contributing to defense is undesirable for the team, especially in the PL, where it is obviously one less player on the pitch.

Rashford will not contribute anything to Manchester United if he were to return because both parties have moved on. The ideal scenario for all concerned would be for him to well enough for Barcelona to buy him at the end of the season.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:31:20 PM

Quote from: igebotz on Today at 07:57:45 PM

Now I'm wondering if you ever made that bet Grin

Manchester city were totally outclassed in every area. Total dominate from Manchester United under the new boss, saw a different Manchester United. Well deserved.

There were a couple of games where Man United looked very good, but mostly they lacked something to deliver the last blow to the opponent and bring the game to an end. Amorim could not find that something. I said earlier that it could easily happen that a new manager comes in, changes small details, and we get a completely different team.
We will see how it will look against teams that do not primarily have an attacking moment.

Amorim's biggest issue was pride; he was repeatedly told that his tactics were not working with the calibre of players he had, but he refused to improve, and whenever something went wrong, he blamed it on his players rather than seeking for a solution. Who, in reality, drives someone like Rashford off the team? Only Amorim. Micheal Carrick has started on a high note, and much is expected of him moving forward.

Micheal Carrick has started on a very high note, now alot would be expected from him going forward.

Quote from: examplens on January 16, 2026, 01:42:30 PM

I dalje je glavni problem tih AML provera sto svaki servis moze imati neki svoj nacin.

Da, jasno. I to je pak totalno sranje.
Taman misliš da si očistio sve i da je kako treba i promijene se nekakva 2 parametra koja se gledaju i ajmo sve ispočetka.

Generalno gledano, sama ideja 'tainted' Bitcoina mi je apsurdna. A jedna od glavnih prednosti Bitcoina je to što ne podliježe vladama, regulativama i nema helpdesk broj na koji zoveš jer s nečim nisi zadovoljan.
Nadam se da će takav i ostati, makar to značilo da će par hakera ili kriminalaca lakše oprati neku lovu.

Quote from: examplens on January 11, 2026, 12:36:33 PM

Here's a new mixer that appeared on the forum, I think he should be deported by theymos
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5571193.0

Another new mixer came on the forum saying exchange without KYC but it provides mixer services.
Nexulume.com Exchange without AML and KYC

It will be deported soon, because any mixer service is not allowed here.

Neki dan sam objavio pregled lokalnih boardova, tako da je vrijeme i da objavim za nas, za Prosinac. Kao i svaki put do sada, pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Prosinac 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

Analiza broja postova tijekom Prosinca 2025

Tijekom Prosinca, na nasem boardu je napisano 253 posta sto je rast u odnosu na Studeni, tijekom kojeg smo napisali 237 postova, te se nadam da ce se trend nastaviti i tijekom Sijecnja.

Analiza merita za Prosinac 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca podijelili smo 327 merita sto je veliko povecanje u odnosu na Studeni kada smo poslali 228 merita, te je to ujedno i nas najbolji rezultat uopce. S obzirom na nasu smanjenu aktivnost u donosu na prijasnje godine, nisam ovo ockeivao, ali u svakom slucaju odlicna situacija.

Lista svih koji su poslali te primili merit tijekom porslog mjeseca. Listu posiljatelja kao i obicno predvodi Pmalek, dok se isto moze reci za listu primatelja koju predvodi katanic97. Iskreno, ne sjecam se da je itko ikada na nasem boardu skupio toliko merita u mjesec dana.

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Prosinca 2025

I za kraj pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu. slackovic je naravno zadrzao vodecu poziciju, daleko iza njega su ovcijsir na 2. te Pmalek na 3. mjestu.

1. slackovic [54]
2. ovcijisir [35]
3. Pmalek [32]
4. katanic97 [31]
5. dkbit98 [18]
6. examplens [15]
7. Daniel91 [15]
8. Trofo [15]
9. Rikafip [15]
10. cryptofrka [9]
11. CroBoy12 [5]
12. freigeist [2]
13. paco92x [2]
14. GazetaBitcoin [1]
15. BitGoba [1]
16. Bridgoro [1]
17. TOKUGAWA.999 [1]
18. durcoin [1]

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13896 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2426 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4555 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 10206 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4482 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2449 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2477 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9112 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 1631 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +37 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 648 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1761 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1961 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (10) 6369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 1853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 12790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5987 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6564 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6562 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3305 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 9434 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +141 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (22) 4164 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3522 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 11348 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2455 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +33 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (25) 6223 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2950 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1332 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3865 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1003 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 447 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1472 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1114 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3313 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 950662: julerz12 (Trust: +13 / =6 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1091 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 6568 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4083 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2168 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 5130 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4349 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14984 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2158 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3138 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1168 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1996 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9079 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3336 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2434 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3199 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7233 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11245 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3232 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 19729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2275 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2440 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2457 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5287 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1501 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +42 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3377 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3819 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 819 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1108 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5386 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 7585 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1773 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9225 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1539 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1209 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 644 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6742 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8285 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 203: HostFat (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Ladies and Gentlemen
We got another update for the signature design. Please update your signature from here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5545935.msg66271683#msg66271683
Hopefully, this won't be the last time. Don't worry, I won't ask for a change every week.

Code:

nutildah
cryptofrka
buwaytress
Free Market Capitalist
examplens
Harkorede
TryNinja
logfiles
Potato Chips
Rikafip

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:15:39 PM

or I just don't understand how this is related to the Bridgoro p2p exchange. Undecided

It's about the captcha, that's close to the point where only bots can solve it. Especially on Tor it's quite bad: click 10 out of 16 squares, or click 3 and wait for them to reload each of them very slow (a couple of times), and do all that for about 10 different captcha screens. Bots don't care about their time, I do.
Which reminds me: how about a captcha bypass URL for registered users, so they never have to go through the captcha again?

Quote from: examplens on January 15, 2026, 08:10:18 PM

Changeum.io is blacklisted by Metamask. This is what it looks like when I try to open it.
Is there anyone from the team who is active and can communicate with MetaMask to request delisting from this base?

https://talkimg.com/images/2026/01/15/UFOErw.png

Thank you for reporting this.

We are aware of the MetaMask warning and are currently in direct contact with their security team to clarify and resolve the situation.

We recently received several suspicious messages from unknown third parties requesting unjustified payments and threatening to report our domain. We did not engage with them and instead followed the official security and appeal procedures.

All required documentation has already been submitted to MetaMask for review, and we are awaiting their response.

We take user safety and transparency very seriously and will keep the community informed.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:57:40 AM

Quote from: examplens on January 15, 2026, 07:59:06 PM

Look at the scam accusation board, accusations against bc.game pretty much dominate. Without delving into each accusation, I'm sure they can't all be characterized as complaints from angry players who lost money.

I took a look at some of the cases on the first page of the Scam Accusation board that mention BC.Game's name, and it's the same as it was several weeks ago when I last visited that subforum. Players from India who are depositing or withdrawing rupees complain about not receiving their money. BC.Game is at fault for still providing that service, but so are whatever shady payment processors these people use because they obviously can't get the job done. It's interesting how many Indians are interested in gambling with fiat at a crypto casino.

BC.Game is also frequently included in the list of the Scam Accusation, but that is not the reason to believe that it has something bad in mind. Most of the accusations remain unanswered and others are a result of the misunderstandings of the users or third party concerns. The constant complains raised by Indian users concerning the INR deposits and withdrawals are however not encouraging. In case the local payment processors are not trusted, BC.Game also has a role in the further provision of those services without adequate protection or clear warnings to users.

Quote from: examplens on January 15, 2026, 07:59:06 PM

Look at the scam accusation board, accusations against bc.game pretty much dominate. Without delving into each accusation, I'm sure they can't all be characterized as complaints from angry players who lost money.

I took a look at some of the cases on the first page of the Scam Accusation board that mention BC.Game's name, and it's the same as it was several weeks ago when I last visited that subforum. Players from India who are depositing or withdrawing rupees complain about not receiving their money. BC.Game is at fault for still providing that service, but so are whatever shady payment processors these people use because they obviously can't get the job done. It's interesting how many Indians are interested in gambling with fiat at a crypto casino.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:59:06 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:40:22 PM

I didn't know they stopped cooperating with holydarkness. It's a weird decision to be honest, and I don't see what they would have against a person trying to help the casino reach a fair decision. The Responsible Gambling issues aside, I remember seeing many accusations by players from India who had issues with fiat deposits/withdrawals in rupees. I don't know whether this is solely the casino's fault or if it also has to do with Indian banks, creating problems when money moves to and from online casinos.

What else goes on there right now that smells like scam to you? Is it the same as what oantt mentioned?

Look at the scam accusation board, accusations against bc.game pretty much dominate. Without delving into each accusation, I'm sure they can't all be characterized as complaints from angry players who lost money. It is obvious that things in bc.game are not in the best condition. We'll see after turning off holydarkness how everything will look like in the future, but I wouldn't be surprised if they slowly give up on this forum and the players from here.
Certainly, bc.game is no longer a casino to recommend.

I don't know why they had to step down holydarkness who was doing a good job indeed. Maybe BC.GAME wanted him to be baised with the casino but he was doing a fair job with honesty.

If you ask me what will happen after holydarkness no longer answers the scam accusations for the casino, I guess there will be no response from the bc game representatives and no one will care about these accusations. With so many better casino out there, i see no reason why anyone would still be playing there and risking their hard earned money Huh

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:19:36 PM

Quote from: TryNinja on January 14, 2026, 05:06:27 AM

For those who don't know, Monarch and CSGOEmpire are actually very known and controversial in the CS scenario. Cheesy

Is there a tldr story somewhere, where I can get brief information about the whole thing? I don't need to know everything in detail, but I am interested if it concerns duel.com, which I also wear in my signature.
I would rather hear a summary from a human than from ChatGPT.

Here are two big letters from Monarch and his side against "the CSGO gambling cartel" (as he likes to call).

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iznz8wLb3pyomQ0IV4v9nTe9W0M0xmO138SwNgDz5Sc/edit?tab=t.0
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rRAi2w4WSlEyCmUVVR70fjZKFwp7pnK9uRxVUielaYM/edit?tab=t.0

I don't have any links for the other side story (if there is any), so feel free to look around for more.

Quote from: ovcijisir on Today at 02:01:14 PM

Tombola u organizaciji jednog miks era, na altcoinstalk, ostalo je jako malo mjesta:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=337845.15

@ examplens, katanic97, dkbit98, Rikafip

Hvala sto si me tagao @ovcijisir, ali zbog novonastale situacije,necu nista da pisem tamo. Jednostavno je stvar toliko otisla daleko da niko ne moze da mi poveruje u pricu. Sada misle jos da smo clanovi porodice... Neko ce reci da je glupo sto se nerviram,pokusao sam da se ne nerviram ali ne ide ... I ako je sve to odvojeno od ovog,ipak ima i tamo clanova koji me znaju odavde,i to po dobrom. Ne zelim da ispadnem lazov i varalica jer to stvarno nisam

Its time for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, and a little bit earlier than last time as I plan to publish the yearly overview by the end of the month. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards, but I still hope that's something that will change in the (near) future.

Post activity per local board during December 2025

During the last month, 13997 posts were written across the local boards, which is a slight increase compared to November's number (13826). Increase may seem small, but what's more important is that the negative trend of decreased activity was stopped.

Once again Nigerian board has been far ahead the others, with Russian board at the 2nd, while Turkish board came dangerously close to them and considering how things are developing, I wouldn't be surprised if they take over that 2nd spot. Regarding the left part of the chart, no changes or surprises there, except maybe French local that slowly and steady keeps going down.

Active members per local board during December 2025

During December, 1441 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards, which is almost as same as the month before (1445 during November).

Nigerian is at the top, but not as dominant as with the number of posts, Russian board at the 2nd spot while Indonesian at 3rd is far behind them.

Local board members per amount of posts during December 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Romanian is the leader with 57%, while at the same bracket Pilipinas had only 15% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is French local board with 55%, while at the same time Portuguese loca had only 20% of those members.

And regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Turkish local board with 57% of such members, while French and Polish local boards didn't have a single member whoe wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during December 2025

During the above mentioned period, 7657 merit was shared across local boards, which is a slight increase compared to November's 7414 merit. Imho, I think that this is generally a good number considering the overall number of posts written on local boards.

Nigerian board remained at the top, which makes sense considering their number of posts, followed far behind by Russian and Turkish local boards. Its also worth mentioning Greek local board as well, sicne I don't remember the last time they had such a high number of merit sent.

Merit/Post ratio per local board during December 2025

During December, the average merit per post ratio across local boards that are part of this overview was 0.55, which is a small increase compared to November's 0.54.

Romanian board is back at the top with 1.88 merit per post, followed by Spanish, Greek, Italian and Croatian board that all had over 1 merit per post ratio, which is something we didn't see for quite some time. Regarding the last month's top board (German), they dropped hard, from 1.66 in Novermber to 0.59 in December, which is not so usual for such a big board.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during December 2025

During December, 527 members sent while 628 members received merit which is similar to previous month numbers (536/610). As expected, Nigerian is far ahead the other boards with a huge amount of merit senders and receivers, even considering their number of merit sent.

Merit per transaction across local boards during December 2025

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards. This time Greek local board is at the top with 7+ merit sent per tx, which is only possible to happen on the smaller boards that don't have big number of merit transactions.

The most active members per local board during December 2025

And for the end of December's local board overview, the list of the most active local board members. klarki from Russian local board was the most active member with 145 posts, at the 2nd place is mandown from Turkish local board who wrote 137 posts while another member from Russian local, Julien_Olynpic is at the 3rd place with 110 posts written. Gj guys, keep it up!

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. klarki [145]	\|	1. MaxMueller [98]	\|	1. mandown [137]	\|	1. fillippone [43]	\|	1. joker_josue [103]	\|	1. famososMuertos [37]	\|
2. Julien_Olynpic [110]	\|	2. Koal-84 [54]	\|	2. xzone [68]	\|	2. Plutosky [40]	\|	2. sabotag3x [77]	\|	2. darxiaomi [30]	\|
3. safar1980 [87]	\|	3. MinoRaiola [52]	\|	3. blomen [64]	\|	3. Lillominato89 [36]	\|	3. bitmover [56]	\|	3. Porfirii [24]	\|
4. zasad@ [86]	\|	4. Unknown01 [41]	\|	4. Mustang Shelby [59]	\|	4. Ace [35]	\|	4. alegotardo [48]	\|	4. Don Pedro Dinero [24]	\|
5. Alex077 [63]	\|	5. willi9974 [40]	\|	5. yenerbatmaz [58]	\|	5. arulbero [33]	\|	5. Forsyth Jones [42]	\|	5. danadc [16]	\|
6. PerfectumR [49]	\|	6. mole0815 [34]	\|	6. kriminall [56]	\|	6. babo [30]	\|	6. Pumared [29]	\|	6. Crystal-Trade.org [13]	\|
7. xandry [45]	\|	7. Real-Duke [32]	\|	7. Hvdv [56]	\|	7. Ale88 [29]	\|	7. Mindyspace [29]	\|	7. Hispo [12]	\|
8. KTChampions [43]	\|	8. cygan [29]	\|	8. Phoenix Anka [55]	\|	8. gbianchi [27]	\|	8. TryNinja [28]	\|	8. darbitmobilerecovery [10]	\|
9. eisen33 [43]	\|	9. Lakai01 [24]	\|	9. ajanwalker [52]	\|	9. giorgione [19]	\|	9. criptoevangelista [25]	\|	9. Sheylon [8]	\|
10. jokers10 [41]	\|	10. 5tift [21]	\|	10. execijutiere [52]	\|	10. kennycryptoitalia [15]	\|	10. Paredao [24]	\|	10. XMRmaximalist [5]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Husna QA [54]	\|	1. patrickus [9]	\|	1. arwin100 [29]	\|	1. slackovic [54]	\|	1. Floxynice [96]	\|	1. yhiaali3 [31]	\|
2. mu_enrico [35]	\|	2. winspiral [8]	\|	2. cryptoaddictchie [29]	\|	2. ovcijisir [35]	\|	2. Jubilee58 [86]	\|	2. Kavelj22 [31]	\|
3. Luzin [29]	\|	3. Danydee [6]	\|	3. gunhell16 [28]	\|	3. Pmalek [32]	\|	3. SatoPrincess [53]	\|	3. khaled0111 [25]	\|
4. AakZaki [27]	\|	4. RedFlix [5]	\|	4. Peanutswar [28]	\|	4. katanic97 [31]	\|	4. Africolo [52]	\|	4. RedFlix [22]	\|
5. Chikito [27]	\|	5. DenisDenis [4]	\|	5. lionheart78 [24]	\|	5. dkbit98 [18]	\|	5. ArabBTC [52]	\|	5. Ochan_yazo_tochant [8]	\|
6. joniboini [25]	\|	6. G.Seed [4]	\|	6. Fredomago [23]	\|	6. examplens [15]	\|	6. Yablee0 [49]	\|	6. shual1982als [8]	\|
7. taufik123 [23]	\|	7. TryNinja [3]	\|	7. bhadz [23]	\|	7. Daniel91 [15]	\|	7. Bishop Victor [47]	\|	7. OmegaStarScream [5]	\|
8. Rashlyowl [22]	\|	8. Jeanne28 [3]	\|	8. tech30338 [23]	\|	8. Trofo [15]	\|	8. Mr Reporter [45]	\|	8. hugeblack [5]	\|
9. Liboy95 [19]	\|	9. FDlabs [2]	\|	9. xLays [22]	\|	9. Rikafip [15]	\|	9. Agbamoni [41]	\|	9. waelov [3]	\|
10. abhiseshakana [18]	\|	10. gibrab16 [2]	\|	10. julerz12 [22]	\|	10. cryptofrka [9]	\|	10. Progress101 [41]	\|	10. Zwei [3]	\|

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [7]	\|	1. Bitcoin Smith [30]	\|	1. cryptosize [14]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [11]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [77]	\|	1. DYING_S0UL [24]	\|
2. TryNinja [3]	\|	2. JSRAW [26]	\|	2. BlackHatCoiner [9]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	\|	2. Jaweria parveen [43]	\|	2. Bd officer [20]	\|
3. Hejzzzz [2]	\|	3. pawanjain [17]	\|	3. alani123 [8]	\|	3. TryNinja [3]	\|	3. JunaidAzizi [43]	\|	3. Z_MBFM [15]	\|
4. pawel7777 [1]	\|	4. vivekdhyani1 [16]	\|	4. Ultegra134 [6]	\|	4. antonpans [1]	\|	4. HustleZ [28]	\|	4. Crypto Library [14]	\|
5. ABCKrypto [1]	\|	5. TheUltraElite [11]	\|	5. Makis Kotzampasis [3]	\|	5. jedaite [1]	\|	5. MusaPk [27]	\|	5. BlackHatSojib [13]	\|
6. TOKUGAWA.999 [1]	\|	6. LucyFurr [8]	\|	6. killerjoegreece [1]	\|	6. pandorian [1]	\|	6. ZAINmalik75 [24]	\|	6. Mahiyammahi [12]	\|
	\|	7. henmark [7]	\|	7. Dimitris [1]	\|	7. TOKUGAWA.999 [1]	\|	7. GbitG [21]	\|	7. malekbaba [11]	\|
	\|	8. Cointikka [6]	\|	8. TOKUGAWA.999 [1]	\|		\|	8. UmerIdrees [21]	\|	8. God Of Thunder [9]	\|
	\|	9. gibrab16 [5]	\|	9. durcoin [1]	\|		\|	9. Doll2233 [20]	\|	9. Hridyansh Labs [8]	\|
	\|	10. TSen [4]	\|		\|		\|	10. Ab de villiers [19]	\|	10. Review Master [5]	\|

Tombola u organizaciji jednog miks era, na altcoinstalk:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=337845.15

@ examplens, katanic97, dkbit98, Rikafip

Quote from: examplens on January 14, 2026, 11:41:45 AM

There are too many similarities here, even your posts on the forum are almost identical.
It's probably easiest for you to hide behind a denial, but for potential users, this kind of information can be significant. Crypto exchanges are a very sensitive industry, a small oversight leaves the user without money, so only an honest and fair relationship makes sense.

I agree - this is a sensitive industry, so we try to respond as factually as possible. We can’t vouch for AlwaysMoney and can’t comment on how they operate. Yes, some visual similarities can be noticed, but that doesn’t mean there’s any shared ownership or management - on our side, there’s no relationship.

Quote from: examplens on December 05, 2025, 10:11:20 AM

What a mess with Bitlist threads and the red circle icon. Suddenly, it's everywhere, Grin

All I see is Opera browser Wink

Quote from: NotATether on December 08, 2025, 01:34:58 PM

I think it would make the threads a lot more clearer if you put a one-word subject inside brackets,

I like this idea. Name changes always makes it harder to find back what I'm looking for.