Last update: 2026-04-25_Sat_08.30h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66653861 (unedited backup) (by Bitcoin_Arena) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 08:26:49 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on April 24, 2026, 07:56:22 AM
Yeah, but what if you send BTC with 25% AML score to the empty address that previously had coins with a >60% AML score? Will the new coins, although relatively clean, inherit a bad score due to the history of the address?
I am thinking the AML scanning tools don't just label "clean" and "dirty" bitcoins but go as far as labeling high-risk and low-risk addresses based on past transactions. You are basically giving them more data to label all future transactions through the address as suspicious/high risk. So it makes more sense not to reuse an address for all the future Bitcoin transactions.



2. Post 66653259 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Sat Apr 25 01:06:50 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:56:22 AM
Yeah, but what if you send BTC with 25% AML score to the empty address that previously had coins with a >60% AML score? Will the new coins, although relatively clean, inherit a bad score due to the history of the address?
Yes, most probably because the new coins will somehow get mixed with the old dirty coins and thus the overall score of coins will have high AML than 25%. The coins with low AML will somehow reduce to AML score of high AML coins but the overall score will get increased that's what's most possible. However, practical tests are needed to confirm such a thing.



3. Post 66652977 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 23:44:32 CEST 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:

Quote from: examplens on April 23, 2026, 09:45:28 PM
Ne znam da li si bio tada aktivan na forumu kad smo pricali u lokalu o aplikaciji Bitcoinmeter . Placa se,ali nedvano sam video da je imam u telefonu. I ova free verzija pokazuje da ce u 6. mesecu BTC biti oko 50k Cheesy Pre toga kada sam je testirao slabo je davala tacne prognoze. Evo ako te bude zanimalo Bitcoin Meter
Ta aplikacija je najavljivala $50k pa cak i ispod toga, bas dugo vremena. U medjuvremenu je BTC dostigao svoj ATH na $130k. Bilo bi interesantno cuti necije iskustvo ko je uzimao u obzir predikciju odatle.
Na kraju, ko moze predvideti planove narandzastog klovna koji neskriveno manipulise kad god moze.

U pravu si,ne moze niko Cheesy Te planove samo on zna ... Secam se da je dkbit98 imao premijum koji je dobio kao kod na forumu. Ima njegov post gde govori kako je sve pogresna predvidjanja aplikacija davala. Nisam je obrisao iz telefona,pogledacu s vremena na vreme kakvo je stanje,ali mislim da ce i dalje biti "fake" najavljivanja Cheesy



4. Post 66651281 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 15:34:49 CEST 2026) in [ANN] SolvoCard | No KYC card | Apple/Google Pay | 3DS Secure | Reloadable:

Quote from: examplens on April 22, 2026, 10:45:25 PM
5 years is too long for virtual credit cards. Several similar services that I used changed their business policy many times, and most of them switched from no-KYC to mandatory KYC. Such things depend exclusively on the card issuer

That's why I appreciate more those services that either don't have a multi-year subscription or that period is one year. It seems we used different providers, because so far I haven't had a bad experience with the VCCs I've used. I would simply stop using one service if a new one with better conditions appeared.



5. Post 66650618 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 11:50:19 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:56:22 AM
If you have 0.05 btc of 30 AML risk, and send those BTC to an address with 0.05 btc of 60 AML risk, it is very reasonable to expect that the final address will have a lower AML score than 60.

This is how mixers and swap exchange are able to clean coins. Coins aren't tainted and marked forever.
Yeah, but what if you send BTC with 25% AML score to the empty address that previously had coins with a >60% AML score? Will the new coins, although relatively clean, inherit a bad score due to the history of the address?

I guess that is very likely to happen as well.

This is a reason why I don't use some addresses anymore... like the ones that I received from campaigns of services that are no longer active, which I prefer not to mention here.



6. Post 66650411 (unedited backup) (by Obim34) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 10:34:38 CEST 2026) in [HIRING] Campaign Manager for DEX.fo — Signature + Activity Campaign:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:10:39 AM
I am curious what will be decisive for your choice, apart from the price.
Price + Managers Portfolio + feedbacks.



7. Post 66650251 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 09:35:56 CEST 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:

Quote from: katanic97 on April 23, 2026, 09:37:41 PM
Jos 4 dana je ostalo,koliko vidim bice jako tesko pogoditi cenu jer su ovo stvarno male nijanse. Iskoristit cu taktiku kao ti i sacekati jos malo. Nagrada nije losa $75 je sasvim koretkno . Tako da eto mali podsetnik da ostavite svoja predvidjanja ko nije naravno Smiley
Meni se vise puta dogodilo da sam cekao da ostavim predvidjanje da kao povecam sansu za dobitak, da bi na kraju naravno skroz zaboravio na sve to i ne bih ostavio nista.

Tako da, pripazi na to. Ja sam svoje predvidjanje ostavio sada jer da nisam vidio ovaj tvoj post, vjerojatno bih opet zaboravio.

Gledam cesto ovu temu tako da sam i dalje u toku. Ispratim sve sto se postuje,pogotovo jer ovcijisir ovu temu drzi na dobrom nivou Smiley
Tako da cu jos malo sacekati,svakako da cu pripaziti. Kao sto examplens kaze ili cemo imati srece ili ne. Kako ide izgleda da cemo probiti
80k Cheesy

80 k je jedna od ''psiholoških'' granica i treba malo veći poticaj tržišta da se pređe.
Došli smo blizu te granice i opet se odbili nazad na 78 k.
Dosta je trenutno nesigurnosti na globalnim tržištima, zbog situacije u Hormuškom tjesnacu, a kada je tako veliki globalni investicijski fondovi, koji ulažu u btc preko ETF-ova, prvo se rješavaju tzv. rizične imovine, u koju po njihovoj procjeni spada i btc.
Par velikih odljeva, pogotovo kada nema puno aktivnosti na tržištu, automatski ruši cijenu.
S obzirom na to, mislim da će moja prognoza ipak ići ispod 80 k, možda negdje oko 79 k.

Slazem se sa tobom Daniele. Svakako da je psiholoska granica 80k. Po ovome sto si napisao mislim da ce i moja prognoza biti slicna tvojoj a to je ispod 80k,bar za sada. Ne znam da li si bio tada aktivan na forumu kad smo pricali u lokalu o aplikaciji Bitcoinmeter . Placa se,ali nedvano sam video da je imam u telefonu. I ova free verzija pokazuje da ce u 6. mesecu BTC biti oko 50k Cheesy Pre toga kada sam je testirao slabo je davala tacne prognoze. Evo ako te bude zanimalo Bitcoin Meter

Da, čuo sam već za Bitcoin Meter ali iskreno, trenutna situacija na svim tržištima je toliko nepredvidljiva, i mijenja se svaki dan, da je postalo gotovo nemoguće bilo što predviđati.
Imaš situaciju da samo 1 post na truth social od ''znate već na koga mislim''  Grin može srušiti sve kratkoročne i dugoročne analize i cijelo tržište baciti u kaos, ne samo btc i kriptovalute već i sve ostalo.
Ne znam zaista što očekivati u bližoj ili daljoj budućnosti, ali stvarno je postalo teško bilo što konkretno predviđati zadnjih mjeseci.
Slijedit ću svoj ''feeling'' i tipovati na 78 ili 79k jer vidim da se zadnjih par dana btc vrti u tom rangu.



8. Post 66650215 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 09:22:49 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on April 23, 2026, 08:48:25 PM
Ehh kad bi mi bar moj trenutni manager priznavao postove u BSFL threadu  Cheesy

Ko drži SageSwap, icopress?
Gotovo sam siguran da priznaje, to je nabolji thread u gamblingu.

Vjerojatno će vidit tag pa i sam odgovorit na ovo. Osim ako sam fulao pa to njie njegova kampanja Grin
Siguran sam da ce racunati, jer i ekipa iz BSFL treba da zna za Sageswap.  Wink
Osim u slucaju da se pretera, pa se napise 99% postova tamo i ako bas ne budu ultra kratki postovi sa 2-3 reci.

Na žalost, nije tako.
Redovno provjeravam spreadsheet kampanje i točno vidim, po broju priznatih postova, koliko mi je i kojih postova priznao.
Definitivno mi ne priznaje i ne broji postove u BSFL threadu, iako od svojih 20-25 postova tjedno u BSFL thread napišem možda 1-2 posta tjedno.
Očito se striktno drži svojeg pravila da ne broji postove u BSFL threadovima koji imaju više od 250 stranica i ti je to, nažalost.  Sad
Zapravo mislim, kao i svi vi, da je u BSFL threadu vrlo kvalitetna rasprava, i dobro praćena ali pravila su pravila  Grin



9. Post 66649711 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 02:50:55 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: FP91G on April 23, 2026, 12:55:23 PM
I think the AML score already considers the history of the coins, many past transactions

You can try to move a coin with high aml score to 2-3 different addresses, it won't solve. I never tried more than that, but I think it will only reduce the score if you add more coins to the same address and consolidate them.
When we test the AML score of a service, we always use a new address to make the results as accurate as possible. Has anyone done a similar analysis of coins from the same source sent to addresses with different AML scores?
What is the difference if it is at an address that was previously 'dirty' compared to a new, clean address?
After such a transaction with dirty bitcoins, both addresses will have an increased AML risk, and transfers from them to the crypto exchange may be blocked.

I don't understand the point of this comparison if the decision to block is made by a centralized crypto exchange.

If you have 0.05 btc of 30 AML risk, and send those BTC to an address with 0.05 btc of 60 AML risk, it is very reasonable to expect that the final address will have a lower AML score than 60.

This is how mixers and swap exchange are able to clean coins. Coins aren't tainted and marked forever.



10. Post 66649404 (unedited backup) (by Bitcoin_Arena) (scraped on Fri Apr 24 00:32:14 CEST 2026) in [ANN] SolvoCard | No KYC card | Apple/Google Pay | 3DS Secure | Reloadable:

Quote from: examplens on April 22, 2026, 10:45:25 PM
5 years is too long for virtual credit cards. Several similar services that I used changed their business policy many times, and most of them switched from no-KYC to mandatory KYC. Such things depend exclusively on the card issuer
I experience this several times with different services. They usually switch to mandatory KYC somewhere along the way once they get a bit popular and as a user, if you already have your money deposited there, you have no choice to verify for the sake of spending it before switching to look for another service

They also have a habit of switching from one card provider to another, which sometimes means they may have to issue you a new card, and that all happens in less than 5 years. Probably after a couple of years.



11. Post 66649247 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 23:37:43 CEST 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 07:33:32 AM
Jos 4 dana je ostalo,koliko vidim bice jako tesko pogoditi cenu jer su ovo stvarno male nijanse. Iskoristit cu taktiku kao ti i sacekati jos malo. Nagrada nije losa $75 je sasvim koretkno . Tako da eto mali podsetnik da ostavite svoja predvidjanja ko nije naravno Smiley
Meni se vise puta dogodilo da sam cekao da ostavim predvidjanje da kao povecam sansu za dobitak, da bi na kraju naravno skroz zaboravio na sve to i ne bih ostavio nista.

Tako da, pripazi na to. Ja sam svoje predvidjanje ostavio sada jer da nisam vidio ovaj tvoj post, vjerojatno bih opet zaboravio.

Gledam cesto ovu temu tako da sam i dalje u toku. Ispratim sve sto se postuje,pogotovo jer ovcijisir ovu temu drzi na dobrom nivou Smiley
Tako da cu jos malo sacekati,svakako da cu pripaziti. Kao sto examplens kaze ili cemo imati srece ili ne. Kako ide izgleda da cemo probiti
80k Cheesy

80 k je jedna od ''psiholoških'' granica i treba malo veći poticaj tržišta da se pređe.
Došli smo blizu te granice i opet se odbili nazad na 78 k.
Dosta je trenutno nesigurnosti na globalnim tržištima, zbog situacije u Hormuškom tjesnacu, a kada je tako veliki globalni investicijski fondovi, koji ulažu u btc preko ETF-ova, prvo se rješavaju tzv. rizične imovine, u koju po njihovoj procjeni spada i btc.
Par velikih odljeva, pogotovo kada nema puno aktivnosti na tržištu, automatski ruši cijenu.
S obzirom na to, mislim da će moja prognoza ipak ići ispod 80 k, možda negdje oko 79 k.

Slazem se sa tobom Daniele. Svakako da je psiholoska granica 80k. Po ovome sto si napisao mislim da ce i moja prognoza biti slicna tvojoj a to je ispod 80k,bar za sada. Ne znam da li si bio tada aktivan na forumu kad smo pricali u lokalu o aplikaciji Bitcoinmeter . Placa se,ali nedvano sam video da je imam u telefonu. I ova free verzija pokazuje da ce u 6. mesecu BTC biti oko 50k Cheesy Pre toga kada sam je testirao slabo je davala tacne prognoze. Evo ako te bude zanimalo Bitcoin Meter



12. Post 66649019 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 22:39:19 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:33:14 PM
i wanted to swap some coins but splash.tf seems to be down right now (onion site is down too).

i hope this is nothing serious and it's just some temporary server issues, but with @splashed being inactive for a while now, i don't know what to think.
Well, they have only been down for 6 hours now (according to BitList). I'm not sure I would assume they are gone because of this just yet. Tongue
6 hours is not a very short period for a service like instant exchange, especially if we have no explanation as to why this is happening and when it is expected to be back online.
Given that they have not been active here for a long time, it seems that there is a problem with this exchange. Unfortunately, because they seemed like a solid and functional service.
Right. But time zones are a thing, and people usually sleep 8 hours a day.

All I'm saying that 6 hours is not enough to say "sad news" or act like they are gone forever. Down time happens, technical issues happens. Tongue

Give it some time. If they are down for 24h, 48h, then we can start assuming they might be gone.



13. Post 66648452 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 19:58:19 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: Halab on Today at 05:53:00 PM
I just realized that examplens' PM was indeed sent, but it doesn't show up on LoyceVs' PM publisher page.
Sorry about that. I toggled the problem, and now it shows up (but without sender). I need more time to look into what's causing this.



14. Post 66648429 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 19:53:01 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

I just realized that examplens' PM was indeed sent, but it doesn't show up on LoyceVs' PM publisher page. So I'm posting this screenshot as proof of his prediction :





Everyone has sent their PM, so here are your predictions for round 16 :


   Name      Prediction      B/M   
   Hypnotizer      75 098,45      0,25% malus   
   Leahized         75 120,00         
   Pmalek         76 407,00         
   cryptofrka      76 750,00         
   ESG         76 930,84      0,00% malus   
   examplens         78 260,00      1,00% malus   
   LoyceV         82 194,65         
                  

And the user protected by LoyceV is... LoyceV !! It’s easy to see why he’s so courageously bullish this time Smiley.



15. Post 66647446 (unedited backup) (by FP91G) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 14:55:25 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on April 22, 2026, 10:26:01 PM
I think the AML score already considers the history of the coins, many past transactions

You can try to move a coin with high aml score to 2-3 different addresses, it won't solve. I never tried more than that, but I think it will only reduce the score if you add more coins to the same address and consolidate them.
When we test the AML score of a service, we always use a new address to make the results as accurate as possible. Has anyone done a similar analysis of coins from the same source sent to addresses with different AML scores?
What is the difference if it is at an address that was previously 'dirty' compared to a new, clean address?
After such a transaction with dirty bitcoins, both addresses will have an increased AML risk, and transfers from them to the crypto exchange may be blocked.

I don't understand the point of this comparison if the decision to block is made by a centralized URI exchange.



16. Post 66646787 (unedited backup) (by SFR10) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 10:43:49 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:

Quote from: examplens on April 22, 2026, 09:02:02 PM
I assume that escrow has more direct contact with them, so if necessary.
Unfortunately, apart from the ones already mentioned in this thread, I don't know of any other routes to contact them.



17. Post 66646558 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 09:33:37 CEST 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:

Quote from: katanic97 on April 22, 2026, 11:24:17 PM
Jos 4 dana je ostalo,koliko vidim bice jako tesko pogoditi cenu jer su ovo stvarno male nijanse. Iskoristit cu taktiku kao ti i sacekati jos malo. Nagrada nije losa $75 je sasvim koretkno . Tako da eto mali podsetnik da ostavite svoja predvidjanja ko nije naravno Smiley
Meni se vise puta dogodilo da sam cekao da ostavim predvidjanje da kao povecam sansu za dobitak, da bi na kraju naravno skroz zaboravio na sve to i ne bih ostavio nista.

Tako da, pripazi na to. Ja sam svoje predvidjanje ostavio sada jer da nisam vidio ovaj tvoj post, vjerojatno bih opet zaboravio.

Gledam cesto ovu temu tako da sam i dalje u toku. Ispratim sve sto se postuje,pogotovo jer ovcijisir ovu temu drzi na dobrom nivou Smiley
Tako da cu jos malo sacekati,svakako da cu pripaziti. Kao sto examplens kaze ili cemo imati srece ili ne. Kako ide izgleda da cemo probiti
80k Cheesy

80 k je jedna od ''psiholoških'' granica i treba malo veći poticaj tržišta da se pređe.
Došli smo blizu te granice i opet se odbili nazad na 78 k.
Dosta je trenutno nesigurnosti na globalnim tržištima, zbog situacije u Hormuškom tjesnacu, a kada je tako veliki globalni investicijski fondovi, koji ulažu u btc preko ETF-ova, prvo se rješavaju tzv. rizične imovine, u koju po njihovoj procjeni spada i btc.
Par velikih odljeva, pogotovo kada nema puno aktivnosti na tržištu, automatski ruši cijenu.
S obzirom na to, mislim da će moja prognoza ipak ići ispod 80 k, možda negdje oko 79 k.



18. Post 66646490 (unedited backup) (by Leahized) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 09:05:31 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 05:43:38 AM
Take it easy, man, I'm not the one threatening. LoyceV has 3 hearts, plus he uses some twilight zone methods  Lips sealed
The real danger is Leahized, who quietly almost has 3 lives, plus the Hunter's card. And I'm the only other player with more than 1 live, so I'll lose it first

Hide prediction is dangerous for me. save me this time.

If I can win once without losing my life, maybe I will be stronger, like you



19. Post 66646351 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 07:43:43 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: examplens on April 22, 2026, 10:30:57 PM
Take it easy, man, I'm not the one threatening. LoyceV has 3 hearts, plus he uses some twilight zone methods  Lips sealed
The real danger is Leahized, who quietly almost has 3 lives, plus the Hunter's card. And I'm the only other player with more than 1 live, so I'll lose it first



20. Post 66645834 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 01:24:19 CEST 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:

Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 07:23:24 AM
Jos 4 dana je ostalo,koliko vidim bice jako tesko pogoditi cenu jer su ovo stvarno male nijanse. Iskoristit cu taktiku kao ti i sacekati jos malo. Nagrada nije losa $75 je sasvim koretkno . Tako da eto mali podsetnik da ostavite svoja predvidjanja ko nije naravno Smiley
Meni se vise puta dogodilo da sam cekao da ostavim predvidjanje da kao povecam sansu za dobitak, da bi na kraju naravno skroz zaboravio na sve to i ne bih ostavio nista.

Tako da, pripazi na to. Ja sam svoje predvidjanje ostavio sada jer da nisam vidio ovaj tvoj post, vjerojatno bih opet zaboravio.

Gledam cesto ovu temu tako da sam i dalje u toku. Ispratim sve sto se postuje,pogotovo jer ovcijisir ovu temu drzi na dobrom nivou Smiley
Tako da cu jos malo sacekati,svakako da cu pripaziti. Kao sto examplens kaze ili cemo imati srece ili ne. Kako ide izgleda da cemo probiti
80k Cheesy



21. Post 66645756 (unedited backup) (by ESG) (scraped on Thu Apr 23 00:49:43 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:30:57 PM
@halab, I'm going to follow your suggestion and spend these 10BTC for examplens to serve as an example... lol
Take it easy, man, I'm not the one threatening. LoyceV has 3 hearts, plus he uses some twilight zone methods  Lips sealed

more for fun, nothing against you man, you are sure to take advantage
 that you will already take 0.75%M,....
 
 the situation of loyceV with three lives is worrying....

But surely now the protégé will be him,....

As for me, I'm one foot in, and the other foot out of the game....hehehe  lets fun! Wink



22. Post 66645448 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 22:55:13 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:45:51 PM
We still do not have any information from the splash.tf team about the current problem with the metamask blacklist.
did anyone try sending them a PM, so they maybe would get an email notification and check the forum?

Quote from: Forsyth Jones on Today at 07:25:08 PM
I'm not saying that MetaMask is disposable, maybe for those who use many altcoins besides Eth, it can be indispensable.
everytime i use metamask, i'm always afraid that one day, not focusing enough, i would connect it and approve something that would result in my wallet getting drained.



23. Post 66644185 (unedited backup) (by ESG) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 16:22:43 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:38:24 PM
still missing Examplens post a prediction....
23 April is still the deadline, right?
-right. Grin



24. Post 66643976 (unedited backup) (by ESG) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 15:10:07 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: Halab on April 21, 2026, 05:51:49 PM
Shit, in the morning rush, I made a mistake. There weren't 8 players left, but 7. Sorry for the confusion.
So ESG will have a 0.25% penalty. And Hypnotizer will have a 0.50% penalty.

So, I'm going to spend some of what was donated to me to avoid losing a life
and if I lose I'm going to lose all that money, so I'm going to spend it
 on a 0.25% bonus of 20BTC, but if you can include/add the remaining 14BTC in bonuses, I appreciate it, and so i wll keep 50BTC

OK, for 20BTC, you now have a 0.25% bonus. That cancels your malus.
And for 10BTC, I can recommend this : 10BTC: 0.25% malus on another player's next prediction.

...

Ok, Thank you.,
The Suggestion is good, but I'll save the rest if I don't get out of this one,
in the next ones I can use it. Maybe.

still missing Examplens post a prediction....



25. Post 66643384 (unedited backup) (by SirJohnVonSlotty) (scraped on Wed Apr 22 11:28:01 CEST 2026) in Novosti:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:20:18 AM
Nisam siguran gde zaista postoje ogranicenja i koja je "najozbiljnija" lista

Ma promijenili smo licencu na costa ricu i mislim da legal nije ažurirao listu, radim baš upravo na tome Smiley Fala na podršci!



26. Post 66642182 (unedited backup) (by Hamza2424) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 23:23:13 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:

Quote from: examplens on April 19, 2026, 09:45:03 PM
Quite by chance, I sold at $3600+ at the end of 2024. It turned out to be one of the better decisions, although I did not plan to sell, more because of the cash out, and ETH seemed the most uninteresting to me.
You was really lucky and it was a good decision. Buying ETH at that range was a mistake for me, but I managed my average price so I think I am good haha as I just have to wait now for the next bull season.

Quote from: bitmover on April 20, 2026, 01:03:58 AM
I sold about half of my position at 3500 and converted a smaller amount to btc.

I regret not selling all the  eth stash, but I still had some hope.

I am still holding now some eth. I am waiting for a good opportunity to sell more or converted to btc.

I think ccecash is the cheapest exchange I have found for such trade eth > btc, I having been making some simulations recently
I also sold some of my ETH around $3000 and bought again way lower so I am not facing a huge loss here. I don't regret it, you should also not regret because bro, it is ETH, and it will recover eventually due to its high demand, the way Bitmine is accumulating it, I am 90% confident that this time we will see a new ATH. Do you think?

BTC is best though, you did great to convert it to BTC, yep you are right, the rates are way lower than many.



27. Post 66641348 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 19:39:19 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:

Quote from: examplens on April 20, 2026, 09:46:49 AM
There are different reasons for using it, for me, it serves as a kind of bridge. For example, in order to use Zenland (escrow platform) I have to connect a wallet, and I use Trezor for that. The simplest way for me is to connect Trezor (address generated only for this purpose) to Metamask and then connect it to the Zenland platform. This makes it easier for me, because I don't have to keep any keys from MM, and the funds are quite safe.
Most dapps allow you to connect a mobile wallet with wallet connect. If you have an old phone that you don't use for anything else, you can use it as some sort of hardware wallet (more like a 2FA) for this type of stuff.

Having private keys on a browser extendions does not look like a good idea. Tongue



28. Post 66641227 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 19:12:01 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:

Quote from: examplens on April 20, 2026, 09:46:49 AM
I honestly don't care what stupid metamask wallet is doing
I'm surprised so many people use browser extensions as wallet, and worse, give it access their entire browsing history!
There are different reasons for using it, for me, it serves as a kind of bridge. For example, in order to use Zenland (escrow platform) I have to connect a wallet, and I use Trezor for that. The simplest way for me is to connect Trezor (address generated only for this purpose) to Metamask and then connect it to the Zenland platform. This makes it easier for me, because I don't have to keep any keys from MM, and the funds are quite safe.

Sometimes I have to receive random tokens, like BNB or pegged BTC in BNB chain, or USDT in solana chain or whatever... there are so many tokens and blockchains around. Metamask supports basically anything. You can also connect it to a hardware wallet. It is a good software...



29. Post 66640471 (unedited backup) (by TokenTikas) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 15:24:31 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on April 16, 2026, 11:15:05 AM
Yes, it can be a problem for many people where to find Nigerian clay.  Smiley
There will be no issue with the soil because soil is generally the same everywhere, only with slight differences in color. However, the point raised here was specifically meant for Nigerian participants.

Quote from: PrivacyG on April 16, 2026, 01:58:11 PM
I wondered why choose the Nigerian board and not do an international art contest but now that I see how much attention it gets, I realize I always forget there are actually a lot of Nigerians on Bitcoin Talk.  If it was done on my local board, all I would get to see is crickets and dust.
I'm also a nigerian member and whenever we see positive comments from you about the nigerian local board, it really feels good. Our board has quite a number of good users, including some well-known members who have been active on the forum for a long time. For this art contest, the organizer (Mr Reporter) discussed it with b1ack and is running the competition. If there is a chance to participate, I hope you will also take part in the contest.

Quote from: taufik123 on April 16, 2026, 06:43:38 PM
Do Nigerians now dominate this forum?
I'm not sure if it is dominating or not, but compared to other local boards, we have a fairly good level of activity.

Quote from: SamReomo on April 17, 2026, 08:29:49 AM
I'm pretty sure there will be more contests for the whole forum in future. All we have to do is to wait for those contests.
Maybe these discussions will come to the attention of b1ack and I hope something can be organized on a global level so that everyone will have the chance to participate together.



30. Post 66640034 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 12:27:01 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:46:16 AM
What did you do here?
You lowered the value only for the counting moment, and then it returned to my prediction of over $76k
Cheesy



31. Post 66639438 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 08:14:31 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:


Round 15 is now over, here are the results :


Closing price on 20/04/2026 : 75 875$

   Name      Prediction      Difference   
   LoyceV         75 898,57      23,57   
   examplens         76 016,00      141,00   
   ESG         75 678,34      196,66   
   Leahized         75 421,00      454,00   
   Hypnotizer      75 398,56      476,44   
   Pmalek         75 214,00      661,00   
   xLays              75 067,00      808,00   
   cryptofrka      100 000,00      24 125,00   
                  

LoyceV, you think you are being smart, but well... ok you are the smartest one in this round. Here's 50BTC. Make good use of it.

Cryptofrka, are you the Chosen One ? Because when you do something stupid, you dodge bullets like Neo ? This time, it’s a random chance caused by LoyceV that save your butt. You avoid elimination.
This round needed a victim, and it’s you xLays, who’s paying the price. You are finally free, you are now eliminated. But before you leave, you must use your Last Will card. Give me two names from among the remaining players to whom you will give 34BTC.

Now let’s talk about round 16, the last of the three bloody rounds.
The previous rules apply, and ESG suggested an idea to me. And this is the perfect time to implement it.
As with one other round, you can only make one prediction via LoyceV’s PM publisher.
But in addition, the last three people to submit their predictions will receive a malus (0.25%, 0.50%, and 0.75%).
Don’t blame me, blame ESG for this round. We will see if your math skills are useful.




Round 16 : The return of the Bloody round
What will be the price of Bitcoin at April 26, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 20/04/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before April 23, 2026, 06:00:00 PM.
 
Cash shop: OPEN
 
Special rules :
The two players with the worst predictions will lose a life.
LoyceV has to protect someone.

As with round 10, submit your prediction to LoyceV’s PM publisher. Click here for instructions.
If you are not sure about the delay, set it to “delay=4”



32. Post 66639075 (unedited backup) (by avp2306) (scraped on Tue Apr 21 01:59:13 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :

Quote from: tvplus006 on Today at 05:02:14 PM
...Did you check when their outgoing transaction was generated?

And how can I see at what time the transaction from MoBitEx was sent to the mempool? Only a MoBitEx representative can answer this question. I can only tell from the transaction hash when that transaction was included in a block.

Yeah Mobitex support is the only one can confirm on when right time on when the transaction was been broadcast on mempool. Base on what Blockchain showing up, we can only see the transactions hash also the block on where this was been included. This one shows us on when the transaction will be confirmed.

Without them sharing those broadcast time, best option we could do is to check our transaction if its been mined on the block. I only have limited knowledge about this and apologize if there's something wrong with my opinion, so hopefully we can read some clear answer towards those questions.




33. Post 66638087 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 20:20:19 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:

I need to put a spell on examplens....



34. Post 66637952 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 19:42:01 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:57:36 AM
Pitao sam menadzera da pojasni ovo i u pitanju je nagrada $100 po korisniku za review. Ocigledno je konfuzija nastala jer je dizajner samo napravio ovaj baner, bez da je obracao paznju na to sto pise. Menadzer je opet samo zalepio, isto tako bez dodatne provere da li je sve ok.

Meni je najsmješnije to da je tagao jaycea kao krivca.
Fino mu je i odgovorio.

Generalno gledano, ok mi je u kampanji kod Little Mousea - al ovo su Royseove fore i bilo bi mu bolje da se makne od toga.



35. Post 66637819 (unedited backup) (by tvplus006) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 19:02:19 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:21:51 PM
...Did you check when their outgoing transaction was generated?

And how can I see at what time the transaction from MoBitEx was sent to the mempool? Only a MoBitEx representative can answer this question. I can only tell from the transaction hash when that transaction was included in a block.



36. Post 66637558 (unedited backup) (by Peanutswar) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 17:51:49 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on April 19, 2026, 11:36:26 AM
Let's go back to on topic.
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.

~

In my perspective its just giving an emphasis to the middle part, which is the exchange of the tokens, so they are just giving a subtle color so the people are just still focused on the middle division of the platform. Or else, they can also offer a different layout of the exchange such as all of the information details are at the right side navigation panel or can be hidden.

Quote from: PX-Z on April 19, 2026, 05:44:49 PM
I even go out of my way to highlight it with my mouse so the font turns white on a blue background - that makes it easier on the eyes. It’s clear that the website’s design concept is centered around the name, which is why dark tones dominate. But it’s now become popular on many platforms to offer both dark and light versions of a site, depending on the user’s preference. I usually choose the light version, but that’s just my personal preference - maybe because of the specifics of my vision.
In mobile mode, highlighting those text it becomes black with blue green background, havent tried in desktop yet. It's still dark imo. AFAIK, other platforms with dark mode theme won't use darker text color with dark bg because it will be difficult to read. Check mempool.space theme for reference.

When it comes with the desktop view is you can get a highlight of blue background and white text, now tried to my iOs it gives me the same font color and just a blue highlight, next is to my android is it gives me a darker color for the highlight and the same color of font.


Android


iOS



37. Post 66637092 (unedited backup) (by FP91G) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 15:40:01 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on April 19, 2026, 03:38:06 PM
The eternal dilemma is which AML checker is the most reliable.

As far as I understand from experience, a 30% risk score is still not critical. That is, until AML tools recognise stolen coins or those from one of the known hacks. Everything else that brings bad points (mixers, unlicensed exchanges) when calculating the AML score, no serious service pays much attention to it.
Since sageswap has a large list of coins for exchange, I would choose a different coin to send to the crypto exchange.

Bitcoin Lightning Network and Solana would be safer for this type of activity. On the Lightning Network, the sender is anonymous, and I don't understand how the exchange verifies incoming Lightning Network payments.



38. Post 66636924 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 14:56:13 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:17:25 AM
I don't think it makes much of a difference whether an exchange charges a 0.4% or 0.6% fee.

I agree that 0.4% or 0.6 isn't much, but if I trust both of them, and I am exchanging like 10k USD, i will obviously choose the cheaper one.

For 10k USD, 0.2% is 20 USD.

But, if some exchanges do charge 1% fee, which is 100 usd. Now we are talking about relevant differences.

Others charge even more than that. Someties even 3-4%

Costs matters.



39. Post 66635530 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 03:04:01 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:

Quote from: examplens on April 19, 2026, 09:45:03 PM
The price is doing much better, I think. It failed to hit the targets that most of us predicted, but I still have hopes for it, haha, as I bought some near $3500, haha. Is there anyone else who bought in this range?
Quite by chance, I sold at $3600+ at the end of 2024. It turned out to be one of the better decisions, although I did not plan to sell, more because of the cash out, and ETH seemed the most uninteresting to me.

I sold about half of my position at 3500 and converted a smaller amount to btc.

I regret not selling all the  eth stash, but I still had some hope.

I am still holding now some eth. I am waiting for a good opportunity to sell more or convert to btc



40. Post 66634872 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 22:56:19 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:36:26 AM
Let's go back to on topic.
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.
It does not seem very difficult to read to me but they could definitely make the text more visible when the mouse hovers over it.  Like this,




41. Post 66634364 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 20:24:55 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:38:06 PM
The eternal dilemma is which AML checker is the most reliable.

Mine  Wink

We use an enterprise endpoint for the address queries, so now there is zero downtime. And prices are still pretty cheap!

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:38:06 PM
As far as I understand from experience, a 30% risk score is still not critical. That is, until AML tools recognise stolen coins or those from one of the known hacks. Everything else that brings bad points (mixers, unlicensed exchanges) when calculating the AML score, no serious service pays much attention to it.

Just keep it under 25% any you'll be good. 30% you might get away with it but ehhhh... I wouldn't risk it.



42. Post 66634222 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 19:44:55 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:36:26 AM
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.
It's too dark actually, in mobile mode these updates are placed under the exchange card/box so they look good but in desktop i guess it needed to be placed under as well or some other pages like update pages.

Quote from: Numeral on Today at 04:20:27 PM
I even go out of my way to highlight it with my mouse so the font turns white on a blue background - that makes it easier on the eyes. It’s clear that the website’s design concept is centered around the name, which is why dark tones dominate. But it’s now become popular on many platforms to offer both dark and light versions of a site, depending on the user’s preference. I usually choose the light version, but that’s just my personal preference - maybe because of the specifics of my vision.
In mobile mode, highlighting those text it becomes black with blue green background, havent tried in desktop yet. It's still dark imo. AFAIK, other platforms with dark mode theme won't use darker text color with dark bg because it will be difficult to read. Check mempool.space theme for reference.



43. Post 66634171 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 19:33:08 CEST 2026) in Tomboi.io - no KYC / no AML exchange, XMR + Tor support - need honest feedback:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:47:57 PM
For example, what did Binance mean before it became a crypto exchange.
Finance with the B from Bitcoin, I assume.

Quote
Yes, I'm quite old, but I remember when g00gle appeared, the name didn't seem like it would lead to this kind of global dominance.
Google comes from googol, which means 10100.



44. Post 66634111 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 19:15:25 CEST 2026) in Duckdice.io Scamming Everyone's using the Shady Bonuses:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:55:35 AM
Did you really raise a flag here because the casino doesn't allow you to withdraw coins from the faucet?
Even if it is not written in the ToS, the casino gives you the free coins you get to try their platform and not to take that money to another casino or even to pay your internet bills.
Play a game at that casino, make $500 from there, and you will certainly be able to withdraw it.


Uhh... Bobstone brushed another reason [that is actually more crucial and should be the vocal point of his explanation on this thread], but for a reason or two that I believe was taken after a thorough discussion with DuckDice team, the reason was omitted.

I can not support the flag as I get the gist of the real issue. But I can't oppose it as well, since Bobstone's statement wasn't backed up by real evidence.

But... yeah... Bobstone, if I may repeat what I said to you in private: that point should be the first thing you said here and included in your explanation.

Just in case you want to change your mind.



45. Post 66633938 (unedited backup) (by Numeral) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 18:20:31 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:36:26 AM
Let's go back to on topic.
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.

[...]

I also find it a bit hard to read text in this color; I even go out of my way to highlight it with my mouse so the font turns white on a blue background - that makes it easier on the eyes. It’s clear that the website’s design concept is centered around the name, which is why dark tones dominate. But it’s now become popular on many platforms to offer both dark and light versions of a site, depending on the user’s preference. I usually choose the light version, but that’s just my personal preference - maybe because of the specifics of my vision.



46. Post 66633157 (unedited backup) (by prodigal son) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 13:38:13 CEST 2026) in -- Vlad2Vlad's Ban Appeal :

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:21:30 AM
yes, that's my account.  there's only Vlad2Vlad in crypto and only one such account.  I changed the password a bunch of times cause i kept forgetting it since i wasn't using it very often.  
You can prove that you are the owner of the account by signing the address 1FL8V65zjeNbwV2tFM363d11YM9iL8x8QJ
from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4236484.msg38524360#msg38524360
But that is only until May 25, 2018, which does not confirm ownership for an earlier period.

This:
In the span of ~20 minutes i had hundreds of posts deleted, all
my ~7 accounts on bitcointalk banned permanently, and i was also banned for life from twitter and youtube.  I used to be a bad rule breaking type of person.  
excludes any possibility of unbanning 'your' account. You don't deserve to be here, even if Trump personally came to advocate for you.
You can lock this topic or wait for this account to also be banned.

I'm above president Trump's pay-grade.  Another 5 posts deleted.  gee, i wonder why? 



47. Post 66631862 (unedited backup) (by irfan_pak10) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 23:50:25 CEST 2026) in [OPEN] Tomboi.io No KYC Crypto Exchange | Review Campaign | $100 Reward:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:56:33 PM
...

What is the payment rate here?
$100 for the most insightful, comprehensive review, or is the number of slots limited?
It's a bit unclear, it sounds like only one review will be rewarded with $100, while the others will participate, but there is no guarantee what the prize will be.

It means they have limited no. of slots, and each slot can get uptown 100$ worth of rewards based on the review. This is what I think from the OP



48. Post 66631105 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 20:10:07 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:


So, here are your predictions for round 15 :


   Name      Prediction   
   xLays              75 067,00   
   Pmalek         75 214,00   
   Hypnotizer      75 398,56   
   Leahized         75 421,00   
   ESG         75 678,34   
   LoyceV         75 898,57   
   examplens         76 016,00   
   cryptofrka      100 000,00   
            

And the user protected by LoyceV is... cryptofrka. You will see for yourself how LoyceV picked his name once the PM is visible. What a shame about this "protector"....

And I wanted to talk to you about round 16 to let you know not to wait too long after the round 15 results, or maybe not, because timing could be important.



49. Post 66629636 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 11:26:19 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (57) 14369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (14) 9540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4913 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10725 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9550 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 8618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6192 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2470 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2105 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6536 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1879 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 757 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2905 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6718 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3574 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 9768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 715 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4294 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4436 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 20586 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6318 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3031 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1690 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1488 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3705 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3444 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2238 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4449 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 15339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2218 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3303 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +83 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 12162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1383 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2258 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9636 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2523 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3418 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 7381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11289 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1417 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4013 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2474 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2538 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 5641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1546 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3508 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1890 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 829 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5515 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 7888 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1552 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 9665 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1242 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 7006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8488 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)