Last update: 2025-10-14_Tue_12.24h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none

Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 65920132 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Tue Oct 14 12:19:01 CEST 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:16:32 AM
/snip

Cucurella i jeste u UCL, mozda da mu doda neke elemente NFL, onu jaje loptu ili slicno.

Nisam mislio da nije u UCL nego da ako ide s njim, onda mora dodati neki NFL element. A ovo nije loša ideja. Nacrtaš Cucurellu s nekom zbunjenom facom jer se nalazi na NFL igralištu. Vjerujem da bi bilo fora. Samo pitanje je želi li Roobet nešto tako smiješno ili nešto drugo.


2. Post 65918014 (unedited backup) (by LDL) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 20:21:13 CEST 2025) in Cloudbet.com | Review Campaign | Earn up to $50!:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 06:16:39 PM
Quote from: LDL on Today at 05:58:25 PM
@Hhampuz, Dear honourable manager , what about the review campaign update?

cloudbet.com is offline, right?
Or it's just for me.

update: Yeah, it seems that it's up to me, probably a restricted zone because I accessed it using a VPN. Strange that I get a 404 error page and not an explanation about the reason.
You may have a network problem there, or it may not be allowed in your country.
But I'm completely fine here and I can access the casino website from my device.

[img height=2্400]https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/10/13/UMmU2j.jpeg[/img]


3. Post 65917666 (unedited backup) (by d5000) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 18:51:55 CEST 2025) in An "ethical" mixer / swap protocol - private but not helping crime:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:39:06 PM
Honestly, I can't see a mixer and any KYC in the same context under any conditions.
The only 'improvement' I would understand is the AML check of the coin before executing the order. So the mixer, if it recognizes coins from illegal streams, would return it back to the sender.
In the protocol I'm proposing, the AML check is done even before the deposit, like an address check on a block explorer (e.g. Blockchair) but for the transaction/UTXOs. Or none at all is done, if the "small amount" rule is respected.

I'm mentioning KYC only because in Bitcoin you can't avoid people depositing coins on an address, so as soon as the mixer publishes a deposit address, the mixer could transfer any funds to it, including not-pre-screened high risk coins. Of course simply returning the funds back would be ideal. But if the mixer is legally required to seize/demand KYC if the coins are "very high risk" (e.g. directly stolen funds) then in this case a minimal KYC infrastructure for these cases would be unavoidable.

I basically am thinking about the same model some no-KYC (or "almost no KYC") swap services are enforcing, but with the "pre screening" possibility before the mixing operation is done.


In theory, one could build a protocol where even this "minimal KYC" is not needed, if the mixer requires a "contract" transaction which gives the user the opportunity to "auto-refund" the funds himself. It is a bit complicated but would not even be user-unfriendly because the "magic" would be hidden to the user:

1) The user provides a refund address to the mixer.
2) The mixer generates a P2(W)SH address with two branches, where the coins can be claimed both by the mixer and by the owner of the refund address.
3) The user deposits coins to this P2WSH address.
4) If the mixer thinks the coins are high-risk, he will NOT move the coins and print out a message to the user. The user can withdraw the funds now at any time, and as soon as he withdraws them, he of course loses the right to mix the coins (so there's no double spend risk and no timelock or so is needed)
5) If the mixer thinks the coins are ok, the mixing operation is carried out, and both sides are happy.


4. Post 65916925 (unedited backup) (by hosemary) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 16:09:25 CEST 2025) in FREEbitco.in:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:24:19 PM
Is this confirmed that there are no withdrawals from this site?
Yes, they haven't processed any withdrawals for more than two months and don't care about users complaints at all.


Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:24:19 PM
As far as I remember, it was selective, and only those with 2FA activated and an address already added could withdraw.
If you have 2FA activated or use your profile address for your withdrawal, the only difference is that you wouldn't need to confirm your withdrawal via email.
Currently, they send the authorization emails for withdrawals and people can confirm the withdrawals. The problem is that withdrawals stay pending and are not processed at all.


5. Post 65909673 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 20:50:25 CEST 2025) in FREEbitco.in:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:20:21 PM
Quote from: FinneysTrueVision on October 09, 2025, 11:57:20 PM
The site might no longer be here tomorrow. Nobody has received payment in months, their domain expires in less than a day, and they’ve been transferring funds to Binance. I hope your losses are not too big. You should have withdrawn a while ago while many people were raising concerns.
It seems that the moment has come. freebitco.in is no longer alive. This looks like an expired domain, it is no longer certain that the domain is under the control of the original freebitco.in the team.
the domain is back up and the website is running like nothing happened.





and from the looks of it, the domain was auto renewed for another year.
i think the auto renew kicked in late, which is why the domain went into a grace period and appeared to have been expired?

or am i just misunderstanding the meaning of the "autoRenewPeriod"?


6. Post 65908313 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 15:15:19 CEST 2025) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 08:28:57 AM
Quote from: examplens on October 10, 2025, 10:32:34 AM
It seems that Splash exchange is slowly being used for day trading Monero. Just look at the reserves and you will know if XMR is in an up or down trend.
I wonder if this will cause a reaction and increase the fee for XMR pairs. Something similar happened on eXch, so the XMR fee was raised to 5%

It's too early to talk about this, as the total reserves for all cryptocurrencies have always been less than 1 Bitcoin, and daily trading volumes are less than $10,000. It's been about three months since this topic was created, and it's clear the liquidity issue hasn't been resolved yet.

Most exchanges solve this by using third party liquidity,  which is a big problem because those third parties freeze funds, demand kyc etc

Maybe splash could create  a pool for liquidity providers, with good ROI. This is how some dex protocols solve the liquidity issue. Of course,  people would have to trust splash.


7. Post 65907753 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 12:19:43 CEST 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (60) 13660 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 294 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 8864 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4150 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1719 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2656 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 9553 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4326 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2394 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 8569 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5796 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 8139 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1600 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5837 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1814 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (9) 6299 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1818 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 169515: EcuaMobi (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2553 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5919 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6454 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3096 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +130 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3083 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3965 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3409 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10969 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3998 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (56) 19022 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 6152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2812 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 8293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 740502: condoras (Trust: +12 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (3) 675 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1304 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3752 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 439 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1444 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3494 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1083 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6238 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +97 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3941 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1715 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (3) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 5055 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4189 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 14680 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2986 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +74 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (30) 10987 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1164 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1932 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 8858 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3206 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2352 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3017 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6947 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 11199 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 3167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3591 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 19122 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2321 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2632 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2374 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4964 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5101 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 971 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5210 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 7294 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1668 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 9043 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1486 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5902 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2815 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +6 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2049 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (7932 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 5797: grue (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (474 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust:  neutral) (435 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 13813: smooth (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust:  neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 14716: rb1205 (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


8. Post 65902642 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 08:17:19 CEST 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:
Quote from: slackovic on Today at 06:03:57 AM
Quote from: katanic97 on October 09, 2025, 10:10:13 AM
Ako se sve ispostuje moze da se zaradi $50 za sve stavke sto i nije tako lose kao sto kazes. Ocekivao sam vise prijava ali za sad mi ne deluje kao da ce biti neki veliki odziv. Prijavio sam se,pa cemo videti

/snip

Sad se već skupilo blizu 40 prijava što nije tako malo. Ali opet, nije ni puno prijava kad se može zaraditi za tri gableca kod nas, a sve napraviš u 10-15 minuta.

U tablici vidim da ti je prijava prihvaćena, a vidim da se i examplens prijavio te je njegova prijava također prihvaćena. Sretno momci! Smiley

Dobro to jeste,ali ako se sve ispostuje moze biti okej isplata Smiley
Inace,nisam provalio da sam prihvacen,hvala ti na info. Eto i @examplens,hvala slackovic!


9. Post 65902609 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 08:04:01 CEST 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:
Quote from: katanic97 on October 09, 2025, 10:10:13 AM
Ako se sve ispostuje moze da se zaradi $50 za sve stavke sto i nije tako lose kao sto kazes. Ocekivao sam vise prijava ali za sad mi ne deluje kao da ce biti neki veliki odziv. Prijavio sam se,pa cemo videti

/snip

Sad se već skupilo blizu 40 prijava što nije tako malo. Ali opet, nije ni puno prijava kad se može zaraditi za tri gableca kod nas, a sve napraviš u 10-15 minuta.

U tablici vidim da ti je prijava prihvaćena, a vidim da se i examplens prijavio te je njegova prijava također prihvaćena. Sretno momci! Smiley


10. Post 65900482 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 18:36:25 CEST 2025) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
I've been slacking with these overviews for quite some time, publishing them at the end of the month, so this time I've decided to do it a bit earlier for a change. As always, all charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic Space.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards.


Post activity per local board during September 2025

Increase of activity in Nigerian board continues, from 3812 posts in August to 4255 in September, making it their new all time high. At the same time, majority of the other very active local boards had decreased activity, and that's something that is going on for a while.

Generally speaking, no surprise that total amount of posts written across local boards dropped from 13107 in August to 12612 in September.



Active members per local board during September 2025

During the last month, 1292 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards, which is a decrease compared to August (1344).

While in August Russian board still had more active members than Nigerian board, this changed in September and now Nigerian is finally topping this chart as well, and the difference will probably keep increasing. All the other local boards are far behind the others, with mostly decreased number of active members compared to month before.



Local board members per amount of posts during September 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Spanish is the leader with 54% of such members, while Pakistan local had only 12% members in that bracket.

In the 2-9 posts bracket, Polish the leader with 60%, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage of such members (21%)

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Nigerian and Portuguese local boards ahsred the 1st spot with 47%, while French had only 6% of members in that group.



Merit shared per local board during September 2025

During September, 8922 merit was shared acorss local boards, which is a decrease compared to month before (9258). Even the record high 2964 merit that was shared in Nigerian board didn't help, which is due the fact that many of the other active local boards had decrease of merit in that period. It will be inreersting to see whether Nigerian local breaks the 3k merit shared mark, something that hasn't been broken in local boards since the early merit days, back in 2018 in Russian board.



Merit/Post ratio per local board during September 2025

The average merit per post across local boards was 0.7, the exactly the same as in August. Once again Romanian is at the top, and this time with even higher ratio than month before, and again followed by German board while this time Italian board is 3rd instead of Spanish.



Merit senders and receivers per local board during September 2025

During September, 582 members sent while 656 received merit. Nigerian local board dominates this board as well, with the diference that hasn't been seen in a long time.



Percentage of merited posts across local boards during September 2025

I thought that 100% of merited posts in Romanian board was just an anomaly, but they almost managed to achieve that 2 months in a row while Polish board also had a very high percentage, but its no so weird given their amount of posts. What is a surprise though is Italian board, given their pretty good overall activity (that was lower than usual in the last few months).



Merit per transaction across local boards during September 2025

This month German board is at the top having which is not the surprise given their high merit per post ratio, but French and Greek definitely are.



The most active members per local board during September 2025

Last but not the list in this monthly overview, list of the most active members per local board. joker_josue from Portuguese board remained at the top with 144 posts, while executijere and mandown from Turkish board are at the 2nd and 3rd spot with also respectable 140 and 124 posts. GG guys, keep it up!


Russian |German |Turkish |Italian |Portuguese |Spanish |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. klarki [124] |1. MaxMueller [82] |1. execijutiere [140] |1. Ale88 [47] |1. joker_josue [144] |1. famososMuertos [57] |
2. zasad@ [90] |2. Lakai01 [77] |2. mandown [124] |2. fillippone [40] |2. TryNinja [62] |2. darxiaomi [52] |
3. Numeral [85] |3. cygan [58] |3. ajanwalker [66] |3. *Ace* [36] |3. bitmover [59] |3. Porfirii [31] |
4. Julien_Olynpic [79] |4. Koal-84 [50] |4. RaltcoinsB [62] |4. babo [30] |4. sabotag3x [52] |4. danadc [23] |
5. Alex077 [64] |5. MinoRaiola [50] |5. yenerbatmaz [54] |5. Plutosky [28] |5. mikel_012 [49] |5. Don Pedro Dinero [21] |
6. safar1980 [48] |6. Real-Duke [40] |6. blomen [52] |6. conilmionome [27] |6. Forsyth Jones [38] |6. Hispo [15] |
7. Lannakosa [42] |7. Unknown01 [34] |7. Mustang Shelby [51] |7. Lillominato89 [26] |7. alegotardo [36] |7. paxmao [7] |
8. Excimer [41] |8. mole0815 [29] |8. eightdots [44] |8. gbianchi [24] |8. velhoti [26] |8. btc-marty [6] |
9. KTChampions [41] |9. 5tift [21] |9. xzone [41] |9. giorgione [22] |9. alexrossi [22] |9. darbitmobilerecovery [6] |
10. eisen33 [39] |10. Soonandwaite [20] |10. Black Mbaye [40] |10. martinom [18] |10. rdluffy [22] |10. d5000 [5] |

Indonesian |French |Pilipinas |Croatian |Nigerian |Arabic |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. traderethereum [25] |1. Danydee [12] |1. gunhell16 [63] |1. slackovic [45] |1. Jubilee58 [83] |1. Kavelj22 [36] |
2. Rashlyowl [24] |2. patrickus [9] |2. technicalguy83 [55] |2. ovcijisir [41] |2. Charles-Tim [75] |2. yhiaali3 [24] |
3. Nahl [22] |3. oscar2000 [5] |3. tech30338 [54] |3. katanic97 [38] |3. Mr_Brilliant$ [52] |3. khaled0111 [23] |
4. maydna [22] |4. TryNinja [4] |4. blockman [52] |4. Pmalek [27] |4. Floxynice [51] |4. FoxTM1 [7] |
5. mu_enrico [21] |5. akfreebtc [4] |5. Peanutswar [42] |5. examplens [26] |5. Donk1 [49] |5. HistoLock [7] |
6. Akbarkoe [20] |6. GrosWesh [3] |6. cryptoaddictchie [37] |6. Rikafip [20] |6. Bright0515 [48] |6. AP Taurus Capital [6] |
7. joniboini [20] |7. SimonBHB [3] |7. arwin100 [27] |7. Trofo [17] |7. Tonimez [42] |7. Ochan_yazo_tochant [6] |
8. TelolettOm [18] |8. G.Seed [2] |8. Russlenat [23] |8. dkbit98 [13] |8. Karl_3000 [40] |8. Sebastian Michaelis [5] |
9. MAAManda [17] |9. mably [2] |9. bhadz [22] |9. paco92x [11] |9. JoyceBTC [37] |9. hugeblack [4] |
10. masulum [15] |10. Becassin [1] |10. coin-investor [21] |10. CroBoy12 [9] |10. PremiumcryptoHub [36] |10. GxSTxV [2] |

Polish |Indian |Greek |Romanian |Pakistan* |Bengali* |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. cygan [26] |1. Bitcoin Smith [42] |1. Ultegra134 [18] |1. GazetaBitcoin [12] |1. qurbanshah02 [76] |1. Bd officer [23] |
2. TryNinja [4] |2. JSRAW [32] |2. cryptosize [10] |2. NeuroticFish [6] |2. JunaidAzizi [40] |2. Crypto Library [22] |
3. pawel7777 [4] |3. pawanjain [28] |3. condoras [8] |3. TryNinja [4] |3. BTC FutureKing [31] |3. DYING_S0UL [18] |
4. ertil [2] |4. henry1111 [20] |4. alani123 [6] |4. othell_rogue [1] |4. ZAINmalik75 [31] |4. God Of Thunder [14] |
5. EXMON [1] |5. IIrik11 [19] |5. apogio [4] | |5. HustleZ [28] |5. Z_MBFM [12] |
|6. henmark [17] |6. Satos21 [1] | |6. Cheema02 [25] |6. Shishir99 [9] |
|7. TheUltraElite [14] |7. siderisng [1] | |7. MusaPk [24] |7. LDL [8] |
|8. XXKK-Exchange [12] | | |8. Ab de villiers [21] |8. Mahiyammahi [7] |
|9. libert19 [10] | | |9. Publictalk792 [20] |9. Review Master [7] |
|10. LucyFurr [9] | | |10. Compromise me [18] |10. Yea_btc [5] |


11. Post 65899582 (unedited backup) (by SupItsJTTV) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 14:32:01 CEST 2025) in No Doubt About It: Shuffle and TimShuffle:
Quote from: DPHOR on September 30, 2025, 12:04:13 PM
Quote from: examplens on September 30, 2025, 11:34:51 AM
Man, take a breath.
There is no need to spam all the threads in the forum where Shuffle is mentioned. If you have a case where you feel scammed, open a thread and express everything you think there. Spamming the forum only makes you less relevant.
And or better still he can post on their Ann thread to have his issues discussed over there. However, if he feels so scammed he can also reach out to their manager little mouse if there any he can do towards that, provided that op has a genuine reason or is free from cheating and or even playing smart with the gambling site.

If you knew anything about anything, youd know since I posted previously the chat with this Little Rat, where I reached out and was blocked. I have reached out many times in fact including directly even today to Ndumm, in fact if you even care I kept a log for a long time but gave up after it reached over 240 attempts spanning two years or so.

If any shuffle employee, or player, or individual can facilitate a discussion with those in charge, I am offering a %20 kickback if such talks end in a payment to my outstanding debts they have accumulated which is closer to $10M than it is to $1M.


12. Post 65899451 (unedited backup) (by Bitz_io) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 13:55:13 CEST 2025) in What is Bitz?:
Quote from: examplens on October 07, 2025, 08:33:51 PM
Quote from: Bitz_io on October 06, 2025, 10:06:08 PM
Good day! We’d like to clarify our name—the correct one is "Bitsz". We’ll update our profile name soon to avoid any confusion. We’ll also try to change the topic title, but in any case, our service has never been and is not related to casinos or similar services.
I would advise you to contact theymos, explain the potential confusion. Usually, when it comes to misnaming a brand, he comes forward and changes the username.
Username on X, you can change without any assistance from their support.

Good day!
Thanks for your help, we will follow your advice.


13. Post 65898003 (unedited backup) (by BABY SHOES) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 03:26:43 CEST 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: examplens on October 08, 2025, 02:44:26 PM
Has anyone switched to the new username/password authentication on Whale, and has that finally solved the annoying daily activation when accessing the site?
I am still using the old method, but it should be easier with one password.
We haven't switched to authentication and username/password because, until now, the active code has been working smoothly without any delays, so we are still using the old method.

Perhaps later we will use authentication for extra security.
There is another option to get the code via a second email, but it seems a bit complicated.


14. Post 65896999 (unedited backup) (by alxSS) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 21:29:37 CEST 2025) in SimpleSwap froze my money & forced KYC while my address is clean:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:06:19 PM
Quote from: Tręvoid on Today at 06:16:30 AM
Quote from: alxSS on October 07, 2025, 06:31:29 PM
Finally some positive news. They told me that my case will take about 3 days to finalize. Hopefully, they refund me the money.

That's great news! Please keep us updated. I hope you’re able to recover your money.
I would wait for the epilogue, though.
Three days to finalize the case does not mean that there will be a refund, it is also possible to freeze forever. Or whatever the name of the new type of robbery is, under the umbrella of AML rules.

Man... you got me panicking now  Cry


15. Post 65896155 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 17:28:31 CEST 2025) in Kako da izgubite svoje Bitkoine koristeci CTRL-C i CTRL-V:
Quote from: ovcijisir on Today at 11:09:04 AM
Iako mislim da je realno mala mogucnost za se 8 znakova poklapaju, jer se sjecam da sam jednom isao generirati vanity adresu za ETH (to su adrese koje pocinju sa npr. 0xovcijisirUtgff...)i 5 znakova mi je relativno brzo softver napravio, ali vec za generiranje adrese sa 6 znakova je predvidao nekoliko sati.
Da, ali vremena se mijenjaju. Tehnologija postaje snažnija i sposobnije da brže izvrši takve radnje a softveri postaju savremeniji. Tih šest sati što je tebi bilo potrebno je hardversko ograničenje. Nekom drugom sa boljom kompjuterskom snagom je možda potrebno tri ili četiri sata.


Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:03:09 PM
Inace, toliko sam se ulenjio sto se tice walleta, koristim hardware cak i za neke sitne, privremene transakcije.
Hardverske novčanike? Ne vidim tu ništa loše. I ja jako malo kripta držim na dohvat ruke i u npr. mobilnim novčanicima. Samo kad i ako mi nešto treba onda taj dio ide u softverski novčanik s namjerom da se potroši.


16. Post 65895501 (unedited backup) (by snowpega) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 14:28:49 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: examplens on October 07, 2025, 08:29:06 PM
Quote from: inspace on October 06, 2025, 06:38:46 PM
It's not the best time for maintenance. Bitcoin is at its highest right now, and I can't lock in profits.  Grin
It depends on the scenario you want to go with.
The fact that they are unavailable right now may have prevented you from buying at high.
Or maybe you won't sell at low.  Cheesy

Haha! BTW nice way of thinking, mate. As near me, your both facts hit me kinda the same.
I mean, CCE doesn't want inspace to bear loss in any form. That's why they may have put their services under maintenance.  Cheesy


17. Post 65894115 (unedited backup) (by icopress) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 03:00:56 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: examplens on October 07, 2025, 08:29:06 PM
It depends on the scenario you want to go with.
The fact that they are unavailable right now may have prevented you from buying at high.
Or maybe you won't sell at low.  Cheesy
Or maybe he couldn't sell at the all-time high to buy at a lower price today.

But I like the way you think. I'd say I fall into the second category, as the thought of selling coins at 0.125 m per Bitcoin terrifies me.

There's something else... I've caught myself many times not wanting to sell coins, so that my inner self would continue to consider myself a hodler and not a trader.  Smiley


18. Post 65893754 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 23:54:31 CEST 2025) in 🌌WEISS Crypto Casino| 8 BTC + 70 FS Welcome Pack ♠️ Unique February Token Sale:
Quote from: WEISS.bet on Today at 01:38:23 PM
~

Hi examplens,

Just to clarify, everything regarding this situation has already been explained directly to ovcijisir in an email from our Support Team. We try to make sure to cover all points and provide as much detail as possible. We’ve been following the discussion on the forum and understand the attention this case has received.

I noticed that you are using fact that you contacted me personally by e-mail to avoid addressing your problems publicly. You run the business where transparency and trust are priorities. I still feel cheated and think your casino is very untrustworthy. Also I feel like you are purposely hiding 100% KYC policy for withdrawals.

In first the e-mail you sent me you just quoted your TOC, blamed customer support on everything and probably let AI generate the rest of the e-mail. There was no information why was I accused for using illegal "strategies".

In second e-mail answered question if it is possible to withdraw funds without KYC and you said that in my case it is impossible.

In third e-mail (sent few hours after @Examplens asked you about "strategies")   I was notified that I can withdraw the funds without KYC, but still I guess that KYC policy is enforced to all other players, so with me it's just exception.

It's easy to blame customer support on everything that happened, but the fact is that they didn't decide for themselves that I was using "strategies". Also stopping my wagering progress for my deposit couldn't be their decision. They were just the messengers and they had to look into system to get information. This leads me to believe that your casino system was designed with flaws this on purpose.

Quote from: WEISS.bet on Today at 01:38:23 PM
That said, our main focus is to ensure that a situation like this doesn’t happen again. We’re not trying to make excuses, we just want to address the matter and make sure it’s fully resolved.

Any information about the actions you are going to take so situation like this never happens? There are a lot of red flags that can probably be easily fixed and most of other casinos have them implemented, but still on weiss.bet we must rely on untrustworthy customer support to have some basic information like minimum withdrawal limit or wagering progress.



BTW. I suggest that, as the casino has 100% KYC policy for withdrawals, that it would be fair that it should also be 100% KYC policy for deposits. That way people would know from beginning that you are 100% KYC casino.


Also I'm still confused why there was stated on the Games&rounds section that only 1x wagering was required as that is not true?
Quote from: WEISS.bet on August 19, 2025, 11:51:20 AM
- The bonus comes with just x1 wagering.
If not all games contribute towards wagering requirement ot should be stated.



19. Post 65892032 (unedited backup) (by WEISS.bet) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 15:38:25 CEST 2025) in 🌌WEISS Crypto Casino| 8 BTC + 70 FS Welcome Pack ♠️ Unique February Token Sale:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:27:09 AM
Quote from: WEISS.bet on Today at 08:31:40 AM
Congratulations to the winners on our Spin & Prost Event! 🎉

In 15 days, only two participants dared to participate in your contest. Don't you think that you should give some explanations that are required of you here, maybe there would be more interest in your casino?
btw. We never found out what illegal strategies @ovcijisir used.

Hi examplens,

Just to clarify, everything regarding this situation has already been explained directly to ovcijisir in an email from our Support Team. We try to make sure to cover all points and provide as much detail as possible. We’ve been following the discussion on the forum and understand the attention this case has received.

That said, our main focus is to ensure that a situation like this doesn’t happen again. We’re not trying to make excuses, we just want to address the matter and make sure it’s fully resolved.