Yeah, I checked and they told me the address was fine.

Then I made the transaction. I will do a few more in the next days.

I want to convert some btc to gold stablecoins.
Winter is coming.

This month 120 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

Hello @examplens

I appreciate your suggestions and I’ll keep those in mind for future updates.

I’m usually online on simpleX, so feel free to reach out there anytime if you want to swap.

Wishing you all the best and safe swapping!
Tręvoid

Actually, looking here, when making the exchange, I sent $74.99 of LTC and I would receive ETH 0.02913306 (quoted on the site $2438.69), after moving on to the stage of sending the funds, I was informed that I would receive ETH 0.0291308 ($71.04).

A difference of $3.95 or 2.96% of the value in my case.

Upravo tako. Ma zapravo sam i ja nekako prestao pratiti altcoine. Imam neke koje držim već dosta dugo i naravno da mi je žao da nisam sve prodao tamo početkom godine. Ali što je, tu je. Prije par godina se moglo pratiti altcoine. Ali danas je to postalo preteško ili sam ja ostario. Jednostavno se iz ničega rodi nekakav hype koji zamre nakon par dana. To mi je prestresno za pratiti tako da držim ovo što imam u nadi nekog bull runa za altove pa da i to prebacim u BTC i stablecoin.

A što se tiče airdropova - tuga, čemer i jad. Jednostavno se nema što za podijeliti jer se sve svodi na nekakve taskove koje odrađuješ mjesecima da bi na kraju dobio par desetaka dolara. Još jedino polažem nade u Linea airdrop i to je to. Ali za Lineu se trebalo krenuti tamo 2022. ili tako nešto.

Hello @examplens

Thanks again for your interest and understanding! I have replied in here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5544046.msg65536788#msg65536788

Hello @examplens

Thanks for your question! I’m usually available on my computer for around 8 hours each day, so most of the time you’ll find the service up and running. Since this is a peer-to-peer setup and I’m just one person, there might be times when I’m offline or taking a break, but I do my best to keep things accessible and respond quickly when I’m back. If you ever have trouble reaching me or want to know about availability, best approach is to send a message on simpleX and I’ll get back to you as soon as I can.

There are no live status indicators or automated notifications, so direct communication is the most reliable way to check availability.

Hello @FlowCoin

You can exchange cryptocurrency with any AML % (Score)

This is our Terms of Service, you can see more at (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0)

• We don’t keep any records of what you do. There’s nothing to share with anyone.
• Anyone can use our service to swap. We don’t block or reject anyone.
• We don’t ask who you are. No ID checks. No AML checks. No KYC checks. No questions. You just swap and leave.
• We only give you a place to swap crypto. What you do outside is your business.
• If you send money to the wrong place, it’s your fault. Crypto can’t be back.
• Use Tor, VPN, Proxy or anything you want. We support your privacy.
• We don’t collect anything no cookies, no IPs, no logs, nothings.
• We don’t have prohibited jurisdictions because can’t detect your country, we don’t log IP addresses or process location data.
• I always provide letters of guarantee during our swaps. You can obtain one when we conduct a swap, and verify its authenticity using our public key.
• I will never refuse to give you a letter of guarantee. If I refuses to do so, consider it a red flag and suspect a scam.
  

if you have any other questions that above does not covers please get in touch with me on SimpleX.

Evo i pregleda aktivnosti naseg boarda tijekom  Svibnja. Pregled je napravljen uz pomoc @DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te @TryNinja Ninjastic.space a sve slike su uploadano na joker_josue TalkImg.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Svibanj 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Svibnja 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca napisano je 380 postova na nasem boardu sto je odlicno povecanje aktivnosti u odnosu na Travanjske brojke (321 post) te je nastavak pozitvnog trenda koji traje vec mjesecima, od kad nam se pojavilo par novih clanova.




Na ovom chartu se vidi nas oporovak te napredak u zadnjih par mjeseci.

---

Analiza merita za Svibanj 2025

Tijekom Svibnja je podijeljeno 202 merita sto je solidan pad u odnosu na Travanj iako smo bili dosta aktivniji. Unatoc tome, mislim da je ta brojka i dalje dosta dobra s obzirom na kolicinu napisanih postova te i dalje imamo skroz pristojan merit/post ratio (0.53)




Lista svih koji su podijelili te primili merit na nasem boardu tijekom Svibnja, koja je za 3 clana kraca u odnosu na onu za Travanj. Ono sto se nije promjenilo su imena na vrhu: Pmalek je opet podijelio najvise dok je katanic97 primio najvise merita.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Svibnja 2025

Unatoc povecanju broja postova od skoro 20% u odnosu na prethodno razdoblje, lista aktivnih clanova se nazalost nije povecala, nego naprotiv smanjila za jednog clana. Na vrhu je opet katanic97 koji je bio jos aktivniji nego mjesec ranije, na drugom mjestu je btcltcdigger, ja sam na trecem mjestu dok je drvena medalja ovaj put rezervirana za Pmaleka.  

1. katanic97 [63]
2. btcltcdigger [45]
3. Rikafip [38]
4. Pmalek [30]
5. Trofo [30]
6. dkbit98 [27]
7. slackovic [27]
8. cryptofrka [25]
9. examplens [24]
10. ovcijisir [23]
11. paco92x [11]
12. CroBoy12 [9]
13. SirJohnVonSlotty [7]
14. TalkativeCoin [7]
15. VoxelX [6]
16. Lunorael [3]
17. GazetaBitcoin [2]
18. FatFork [1]
19. VashaUdacha777 [1]
20. aquamarin13 [1]

This is a 100% trust model.
I mean, we just trust and not verify.
Examplens has raised this issue and I didn't get the answer given him. Since Trevoid is in this thread, they could just answer. Must I be in contact with them for to perform a swap? Are we talking about offline swapping here?

Ne vjerujem da nakon toliko godina na najpopularnijem hardverskom novčaniku može biti greška. To je pročešljano toliko puta...da išta postoji već bi bilo exploita. Također nisam od onih koji electrum instaliraju čim dođe nova zakrpa. Novo nije uvijek bolje pogotovo sa sigurnosnog aspekta. Radije ja pustim druge da testiraju to jedno godinu dana.

Osim naravno u slučaju nekog kritičnog vulrnabilitya.

Ovo već je razlog koji prihvaćam. Ali opet ne vjerujem da je algoritam za zaštitu od kvantnih računara moguće kvalitetno napraviti na postojećem hardveru. Nekako mislim da će nam trebati sasvim novi sigurnosni element u priči. Kada dođemo do toga, nekako mislim da će sweep na neki potpuno novi HW wallet biti jedino pravo riješenje. Da se razumijemo ovo je moj take na problem kojeg nisam uopće proučavao i priznajem da nisam dovoljno upućen.

Kvantna mehanika i kompjuteri su nešto što otvara sasvim nove grane znanosti i definitvno zaslužuju dobar dio moje pažnje negdje u bližoj budućnosti.

Big thanks to everyone who reported the rate differences!
We've had a closer look over the weekend and decided to impose a 1% correction on fees we get from Swapuz.

Currently we check for new rates as soon as we fetch the previous batch.
Bare in mind we also interpolate, we can't query every amount, after all. It also wouldn't be a good design for user privacy to send a request for a quote every time a user searches for a pair, because if any of the exchanges we list had their query history compromised it would make it possible to timing-attack our users. Even if they didn't use that particular service.

A little advice based on my personal experience... if you want to withdraw a few thousand dollars (in any casino, not just Whale), then divide this amount by two and the probability that you will be asked for KYC or something like that will tend to zero (although I don't remember Whale asking anyone for KYC despite the fact that there are footnotes about it in the documentation).

The same applies to the speed of transaction processing. I would dare to assume that the smaller the amount of the withdrawal request, the less likely the system will redirect the request for manual verification.

Inter yes, an easy bet with good odds but I'm not sure about Real Madrid because Juventus can do miracles.

In fact, after I lost 3k dollars a week ago betting on Real Madrid, I'm not sure about anything anymore (it was supposed to be a very easy match). Maybe I would have thought again if I knew Mbappe would be in the game but as far as I can judge, he's in a hospital bed.

Ofc he understands, but as he said, he doesn't care. He wants money at all costs and he knows that selling these items will not get him anything. Nobody will have any interest in these and from a person like him.
Perhaps his urgent need is to go to the doctor, but unfortunately for him, his illness can't be fixed with $200...

I will not blame it on the newbies but blame it on old members because you know how this forum works. If someone post about about the little amount of merit needed to rank up, as an old member, you do not need to merit his what he posted but just go throughout his topics and posts history and check for posts that are worth giving merit. If he is qualified, you can the person merit and also merit what he posted here if you feel like. For those that are not worth it, do not merit the person's posts.

It is good to know that some people will abuse this and use alt to also apply which is very bad, but as long as they are qualified, merit them but be strict in the merit is what that I think. I think anyone that is listing good will continue to earn merit even if they do not post on his thread. This is what these people do not know.

I know Reddit is very weird when it comes to using SMM services but I also know that it's possible to utilize such serviced that work.


Would you say BHW forum is trustworthy? Here in bitcointlak seniority and trust ratings actually mean something but I've had bad experiences in other forums. Thanks for the input. Feedback is very much appreciated.

No.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

hey there!

conducting a deal really zero KYC? Is that true? or there is a trigger system?

An API requires a database, which I don't have. BPIP for instance uses loyce.club/trust/latesttrustlist.txt to link to the most recent version of each user's Trust list (updated weekly), and user pages rely on weekly updated static data.

Maybe. But I'm not looking for more work for myself. Things work, I preserve my data, and at the moment it doesn't take too much of my time. Making big changes is something I simply don't have the time for. I'm basically locked-in now in the way things are.

I was thinking the same thing. I think I'd be okay working with someone, but not someone who's been here for 3 months. That doesn't give any guarantee of a long-term commitment to Bitcointalk.

Have you tried [β] BPIP Extension: user info & extra features add-on/extension, Firefox/Chrome? I don't use it myself, but it makes accessing loyce.club a bit easier. Just like I often use BPIP.org to find the link to their Trust list on loyce.club.

Yeah, you’re absolutely right, most of the exchangers listed on BestChange are just WhiteBIT resellers.

The only real “advantage” they offer over going directly through WhiteBIT is that you don’t need to create an account or go through KYC.

But it turns out there are exceptions to that too… and apparently, they’re pretty common.

I have contacted Swapuz on chat several times, but their AML verification system (or something like that) is "temporarily unavailable"  for quite some time (i even tried today).

Swapuz looks a solid alternative to eXch, and I really want to send some coins there, but I need to be safe on the AML side because I don't wanna do KYC.

Fees are really good and I will be glad to become a customer

Are you open to have someone else looking at the code and see how it can be improved, both from design and architecture perspective?

That's true. I only use that page to open a bunch of links in new tabs, other than that, it doesn't really have a function.

It got out of hand I never expected to store this much data when I started all this.

I nakon svih tih godina možda otkriju neku ranjivost koja je prisutna negdje u njihovom softveru. Uređaji koji imaju podršku, dobit će potrebne zakrpe a oni koji nemaju neće. Ako koristiš Ledger sa drugim softverskim novčanicima kao Electrum npr, može se desiti da novi update Electruma dovede do neke nekompatibilnosti sa Ledger uređajima. Ledger bi onda popravio štetu kod novih uređaja ali ti ostaje stari Nano S koji više ne radi sa Electrumom. Bio bi prisiljen da koristiš stariju Electrum verziju i da je više ne nadograđuješ. Tako da ne možeš ni da koristiš šta god Electrum ili neki drugi wallet izbace u budućnosti.

Veći update-i kod blockchaina ne bi imali podršku kod Nano S. Kao što examplens navede primjer Segwit-a ili Taproot nadogradnje. Možda Bitcoin kroz par godina pređe na algoritam koji će štititi mrežu od kvantnih računara. Tu bi podršku Ledger morao omogučiti na svojim uređajima. Nano S je ne bi dobio. Zbog nedostatka memorije ne bi možda ni podržavao novi algoritam jer bi se povečala veličina ključeva i potpisa na blockchainu.

Here are the answers to your questions:
1. CCE Cash will automatically recognize the transaction
2. If you deposit multiple amounts in a single order, you can contact online customer service for help.

Opening a full scale cryptocurrency at this moment would indeed be a risky business to undertake given the aggressive nature of regulators. Musk is a clever guy, and he understands that the right timing is everything. A stable coin is better to him provided he wants something practical and less confrontational and more so this is pegged on a big currency and it is accompanied with a certain sort of partnership and regulatory approval and yeah he has a massive influence in the world of the crypto. He even does not need to issue a coin and by a single tweet he can cause markets to shift. I think when and should he do release something he will do it in a larger ecosystem like X or one of his companies not a meme token.

Jel mi može neko objasniti zašto je nedostatak podrške problem?

Ja ne želim da mi netko ažurira ledger više. Komad hardvera star toliko godina već je dobio sve bitne zakrpe. Jednom sam ga ažurirao prije par godina i to je to. BMK šta ledger radi, meni oni više ne trabaju a nakon onih updatea za seed recovery sigurno neću njihov app koristiti ili bilo šta.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (53) 13348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3742 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1712 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 65636: babo (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3954 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 7957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 7626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1436 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1561 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (9) 6229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2410 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 11385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6338 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +132 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3790 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3211 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 10696 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 10550 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1961 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 18122 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6101 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2722 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1980 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 740502: condoras (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 653 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1218 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 418 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1428 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3370 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2978 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5988 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +92 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1691 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: Igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1976 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1965 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +69 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2004 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 8316 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3367 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2162 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3113 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2601 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 18464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2114 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2313 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +24 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4806 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 7325 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2830 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3699 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4952 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 7078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2718725: Lachrymose (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 8619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4945 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2650 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 635 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +4 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (7640 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (802 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 203: HostFat (Trust:  neutral) (250 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 11275: wariner (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (8392 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 13813: smooth (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 18640: SebastianJu (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (83 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 18953: Stemby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 19971: -ck (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (664 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 20300: Otoh (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 20651: coblee (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (356 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 23092: malevolent (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (362 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Ljudi zaboravljaju da tako funckioniše tržište elektronike. Nano S si platio €50 ili €100 (ne znam kako im se cijena kretala kroz historiju) i imao je podršku kompanije nekih 9 godina. Koliko si u tom periodi mobitela promjenio koji su koštali mnogo više? Kupiš flagship mobitel od €700 i on ti za pet godina nema više službenu podršku i softverske nadogradnje. A možda i ranije. Stari dedo Trezor Model One i Trezor općenito igraju po svojim pravilima.

At this point, I think he is faced with mental apocalypse or something like that. I have received PMs from OP more than twice asking for a loan, even when he very well knows that I could never lend him even a cent. For some reason, his brain still tells him that he can get anything from here.

No sane person who behave like that. Not even a troll 

Yeah 5% is not bad indeed. But depending on the coin, it could be variable. For example, I suppose 5% is reasonable for XMR, but is relatively high for ETH.


It works exactly like this. It's essentially like conducting a deal with someone in the forum's Currency Exchange section. It's good in my opinion. It maintains high levels of privacy.

Ja sam super zadovoljan s ledgerom nano s i ne mislim ga mijenjati dok ne krepa. Ionako ne vjerujem njihovom softveru tako da ga koristim u kombinaciji s electrumom i to radi perfektno. Nista vise mi ne treba.

Hello @hugeblack, thanks for your interest in our service!

We charge a standard 5% fee per swap, it can vary depending on the deal size.

For USDT, it depends on the amount. I don’t usually offer a lot, but in the past, some of my long-term clients have asked for it, and I’ve helped them out from time to time.

I maintain my own crypto stock. That means I provide my own liquidity and don’t use any centralized exchanges.

Please get in touch with me on SimpleX so we can discuss further!

I checked just now and they seemed ok, I'll keep an eye out for it.

We already do that for some exchanges, but most don't support it. We'll reach out to their teams and ask if there's an undocumented way of doing it.

Ah, you're right! That's odd. On it.

I think he charges 5%, and I see positive reviews from https://kycnot.me/service/trevoid-crypto-swaps?showPending=true&sort=upvotes#comments, and you need to pay first.

I think in most of the exchanges, you need to deposit first before making any swap.

Do you have the ability to exchange BTC to USDT, and what are the fees?
Do you have your own liquidity or use exchanges in the background?
Can you go first with trusted members?

Hello @examplens yes, you understood it right. it’s basically a peer-to-peer (p2p) swap.

I'm building something close to eXch.cx i will be rolling it out soon.

Nikad me nisi volio :<

We are almost halfway through this year, so it deserved a little update.

Pos	Users	24/06/2025
1	Woodie	3 008,97
2	paid2	1 252,59
3	internetional	1 099,88
	Bitcoin	1 059,28
4	Halab	987,83
5	LoyceV	975,08
6	GazetaBitcoin	919,53
7	sompitonov	867,63
8	ajiz138	866,55
9	DireWolfM14	785,67
10	examplens	760,67
11	rat03gopoh	743,21
12	memehunter	739,55
13	n0nce	708,34
	Average	652,56
14	GrosWesh	649,64
15	DYING_S0UL	572,18
16	FinneysTrueVision	564,95
17	shahzadafzal	561,87
18	B1g4udge	557,75
19	Smartprofit	555,00
20	jokers10	553,38
21	tokeweed	550,97
22	LogitechMouse	549,00
23	SamReomo	531,76
24	Despairo	521,06
25	icopress	515,98
26	bitmover	503,99
27	famososMuertos	485,73
28	klarki	481,61
29	Rikafip	473,08
30	Taskford	472,64
31	Saint-loup	463,15
32	Koal-84	383,42
33	xandry	380,01
	Random_but_balanced	357,48
34	libert19	314,52
35	worldofcoins	311,70
36	cryptofrka	304,67
37	Buchi-88	301,44
38	slackovic	289,93
39	arallmuus	283,85
40	xLays	253,52

                  


Line chart race : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/

The time has come for another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time for May 2025. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during May 2025

During the last month, 12794 posts were written across 18 local boards which is an increase compared to April's numbers (12356). Russian local board remained at the top, but Nigerian  is coming closer month after month and its just a matter of time before they overtake them.

---

Active members per local board during May 2025

During May, 1241 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local board which is a slight increase compared to month before (1236 during May), which is not a surprise given the increase in the amont of posts as well. In this chart Russian still has big advantage over the others, but we will see how that develops.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during May 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Romanian is the leader with 63%, while in the same time Pilipinas has only 9% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is the French local board with 55%, while on the other side Polish local has only 20% of the members who wrote between 2-9 posts.

And regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian local is the leader with 55% and at the bottom its Romanian local with only 13% of the members who wrote 10+ posts.

---

Merit shared per local board during May 2025

During the above mentioned period 7479 merit was sent acorss local boards that are part of this overview, which makes it a huge increase compared to April's numbers (5873). German local board is back at the top after poor Aoril's performance, narrowly beating Nigerian local while Russian local dropped to for them unusually low 3rd spot.

Majority of the local boards shared more merit than in April, with Nigerian local sticking out (904-1663). At the same time, Indonesian has a big decrease (from 619 down to 304).

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during May 2025

During May , the average merit per post ratio for local board was 0.58, meaning a big increase compared to April (0.48).

Romanian board is kinda messing up this chart once again, this time with even higher merit/post ratio than last month (just to add that this is not too unusual for less active boards)  followed far behind by German local board, while at the same time Pilipinas remiend the dead last wityh only 0.1 merit per post.

Given the recently appointed merit sources in many local boards, I expect this chart to looks much different in the next overview.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during May 2025

During May, 503 members sent while 620 received merit in once of the local boards, which is (an expected) increase compared to April (519 senders/579 receivers). Despite being 2nd on merit amount chart, Nigerian local dominates this chart, leaving all others far behind, and you can say that Indonesian also performed well consdiering their amount of merit sent.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during May 2025

Considering their crazy high merit per post ratio, no surprise to see Romanian board once again at the top with 52% of merited post, while far more active Nigerian, German and Italian are behind at around 30% mark.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during May 2025

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards. Here we have Greek local board sticking due fact that they only had 2 merit transaction during may, causing this unrealistically high merit per transaction value, while Romanian (another less active local board) also had unrealistically high number.

---

The most active members per local board during May 2025

And in the end, list of the most active local boards members. This time two members from Russian local board were the most active ones; klarki with 175 and jokers10 with 169 posts while joker_josue  from Portuguese local board was 3rd with 152 posts written in his local druing last month. Keep it up guys!
.

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [175]	|	1. MaxMueller [113]	|	1. yenerbatmaz [94]	|	1. babo [89]	|	1. joker_josue [152]	|	1. famososMuertos [56]	|
2. jokers10 [169]	|	2. Lakai01 [99]	|	2. mandown [87]	|	2. Ale88 [72]	|	2. bitmover [91]	|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [46]	|
3. Julien_Olynpic [133]	|	3. cygan [80]	|	3. blomen [77]	|	3. giorgione [60]	|	3. TryNinja [77]	|	3. Hispo [41]	|
4. zasad@ [94]	|	4. Soonandwaite [79]	|	4. execijutiere [61]	|	4. fillippone [55]	|	4. Forsyth Jones [59]	|	4. sausalitox [31]	|
5. xandry [88]	|	5. Real-Duke [75]	|	5. Mustang Shelby [60]	|	5. xenomorfo [49]	|	5. tg88 [55]	|	5. Porfirii [29]	|
6. Alex077 [85]	|	6. Unknown01 [59]	|	6. ajanwalker [56]	|	6. Plutosky [44]	|	6. Pumared [50]	|	6. darbitmobilerecovery [23]	|
7. safar1980 [74]	|	7. Koal-84 [52]	|	7. RaltcoinsB [57]	|	7. Lillominato89 [38]	|	7. r_victory [33]	|	7. seoincorporation [21]	|
8. Numeral [58]	|	8. Buchi-88 [51]	|	8. RaltcoinsB [57]	|	8. gbianchi [34]	|	8. mikel_012 [32]	|	8. d5000 [19]	|
9. mak013 [57]	|	9. MinoRaiola [48]	|	9. ajanwalker [56]	|	9. bastisisca [31]	|	9. non fungible anxiety [32]	|	9. Drawesome [15]	|
10. eisen33 [53]	|	10. willi9974 [47]	|	10. Hvdv [52]	|	10. bitbollo [26]	|	10. Mindyspace [31]	|	10. darxiaomi [14]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [90]	|	1. Becassine [21]	|	1. Peanutswar [41]	|	1. katanic97 [63]	|	1. Charles-Tim [60]	|	1. Kavelj22 [30]
2. punk.zink [44]	|	2. patrickus [20]	|	2. gunhell16 [34]	|	2. btcltcdigger [45]	|	2. Joy- maker [43]	|	2. khaled0111 [27]
3. Husna QA [42]	|	3. Danydee [19]	|	3. cryptoaddictchie [33]	|	3. Rikafip [38]	|	3. Africolo [41]	|	3. yhiaali3 [25]
4. mu_enrico [34]	|	4. Saint-loup [8]	|	4. Mr. Magkaisa [30]	|	4. Pmalek [30]	|	4. Sonia_123 [35]	|	4. satoshyat.team [19]
5. MAAManda [31]	|	5. G.Seed [6]	|	5. GreatArkansas [25]	|	5. Trofo [30]	|	5. Tonimez [34]	|	5. GxSTxV [16]
6. Luzin [29]	|	6. tuxo [6]	|	6. PX-Z [24]	|	6. dkbit98 [27]	|	6. Josefjix [33]	|	6. OmegaStarScream [8]
7. joniboini [25]	|	7. Halab [4]	|	7. serjent05 [24]	|	7. slackovic [27]	|	7. Mate2237 [32]	|	7. Privatus [8]
8. len01 [25]	|	8. coupable [4]	|	8. Fredomago [22]	|	8. cryptofrka [25]	|	8. CryptoHeadlineNews [30]	|	8. albon [4]
9. armanda90 [23]	|	9. Angroid [2]	|	9. bhadz [22]	|	9. examplens [24]	|	9. POPOLUV [28]	|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [3]
10. Rashlyowl [22]	|	10. GrosWesh [2]	|	10. blockman [22]	|	10. ovcijisir [23]	|	10. Princess Leah [28]	|	10. hugeblack [3]

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [27]	|	1. IIrik11 [26]	|	1. condoras [19]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [14]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [39]	|	1. DYING_S0UL [22]	|
2. pawel7777 [4]	|	2. JSRAW [25]	|	2. Ultegra134 [14]	|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [35]	|	2. Nothingtodo [19]	|
3. bitbartek [1]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [14]	|	3. coctailnuts [6]	|	3. UsdtBucuresti [2]	|	3. GbitG [25]	|	3. Bd officer [18]	|
4. shual1982als [1]	|	4. TheUltraElite [8]	|	4. apogio [4]	|	4. IonCreanga [1]	|	4. Cheema02 [22]	|	4. Shishir99 [16]	|
5. stwenhao [1]	|	5. M47AK16 [5]	|	5. BitcoinsGreece [3]	|	5. amsterdamlucian [1]	|	5. MusaPk [22]	|	5. Crypto Library [12]	|
	|	6. henry1111 [4]	|	6. changlee [2]	|	6. ethanhunt2023 [1]	|	6. Rustam Meraj [22]	|	6. HelliumZ [12]	|
	|	7. libert19 [4]	|	7. Dimitris [1]	|	7. jedaite [1]	|	7. ZAINmalik75 [22]	|	7. LDL [12]	|
	|	8. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|	8. RnBMC.official [1]	|	8. shinotabu28u [1]	|	8. Publictalk792 [16]	|	8. Bluedrem [11]	|
	|	9. Mastercon [2]	|	9. alani123 [1]	|		|	9. UmerIdrees [15]	|	9. Mahiyammahi [11]	|
	|	10. Orange89 [2]	|	10. mastercryptogr [1]	|		|	10. Compromise me [14]	|	10. Hossain Risfa [9]	|

Pa koliko vidim i nije dijelio tuđe postove nego samo svoje.
Mislim da je SirJohn samo generalno govorio.