examplens's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned examplens in the past 7 days

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:48:21 PM

Quote from: Trêvoid on Today at 09:31:08 PM

Hello @FlowCoin

You can exchange cryptocurrency with any AML % (Score)

You are doing a good promotion, so I guess that's why he thought it was an official exchange and not peer-to-peer. I asked for confirmation earlier for this very reason, lest I misunderstood.

@Trêvoid, I also touched on the topic of the availability of your service earlier, and later, I see that KingsDen also noticed it. Is there any pattern or indicator that potential users can use to orient themselves when the service is available and when it is not?
I assume that as a human, you have time off and are not behind a screen 24/7

note: If you think further discussion is more appropriate for your ANN, just reply in them quoting from here.

Hello @examplens

Thanks again for your interest and understanding! I have replied in here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5544046.msg65536788#msg65536788

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:48:21 PM

Quote from: Trêvoid on Today at 09:31:08 PM

Hello @FlowCoin

You can exchange cryptocurrency with any AML % (Score)

You are doing a good promotion, so I guess that's why he thought it was an official exchange and not peer-to-peer. I asked for confirmation earlier for this very reason, lest I misunderstood.

@Trêvoid, I also touched on the topic of the availability of your service earlier, and later, I see that KingsDen also noticed it. Is there any pattern or indicator that potential users can use to orient themselves when the service is available and when it is not?
I assume that as a human, you have time off and are not behind a screen 24/7

note: If you think further discussion is more appropriate for your ANN, just reply in them quoting from here.

Hello @examplens

Thanks for your question! I’m usually available on my computer for around 8 hours each day, so most of the time you’ll find the service up and running. Since this is a peer-to-peer setup and I’m just one person, there might be times when I’m offline or taking a break, but I do my best to keep things accessible and respond quickly when I’m back. If you ever have trouble reaching me or want to know about availability, best approach is to send a message on simpleX and I’ll get back to you as soon as I can.

There are no live status indicators or automated notifications, so direct communication is the most reliable way to check availability.

Quote from: FlowCoin on Today at 09:20:41 AM

Quote from: apogio on June 27, 2025, 03:25:22 PM

Quote from: Zwei on June 26, 2025, 02:26:32 PM

5% is not bad for BTC > XMR, eXch was charging the same if i remember right. hopefully once Trêvoid starts getting more volume, he would consider lowering the fee for other pairs to be more competitive.

Yeah 5% is not bad indeed. But depending on the coin, it could be variable. For example, I suppose 5% is reasonable for XMR, but is relatively high for ETH.

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 08:59:28 PM

If I understood correctly (I'm a little lazy to research it myself), it's a p2p swap? For each exchange, is direct communication with the seller necessary?
I have nothing against this method, but it can be tedious if it offers a high level of availability.

It works exactly like this. It's essentially like conducting a deal with someone in the forum's Currency Exchange section. It's good in my opinion. It maintains high levels of privacy.

hey there!

conducting a deal really zero KYC? Is that true? or there is a trigger system?

Hello @FlowCoin

You can exchange cryptocurrency with any AML % (Score)

This is our Terms of Service, you can see more at (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0)

We don’t keep any records of what you do. There’s nothing to share with anyone.
Anyone can use our service to swap. We don’t block or reject anyone.
We don’t ask who you are. No ID checks. No AML checks. No KYC checks. No questions. You just swap and leave.
We only give you a place to swap crypto. What you do outside is your business.
If you send money to the wrong place, it’s your fault. Crypto can’t be back.
Use Tor, VPN, Proxy or anything you want. We support your privacy.
We don’t collect anything no cookies, no IPs, no logs, nothings.
We don’t have prohibited jurisdictions because can’t detect your country, we don’t log IP addresses or process location data.
I always provide letters of guarantee during our swaps. You can obtain one when we conduct a swap, and verify its authenticity using our public key.
I will never refuse to give you a letter of guarantee. If I refuses to do so, consider it a red flag and suspect a scam.

if you have any other questions that above does not covers please get in touch with me on SimpleX.

Evo i pregleda aktivnosti naseg boarda tijekom Svibnja. Pregled je napravljen uz pomoc @DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te @TryNinja Ninjastic.space a sve slike su uploadano na joker_josue TalkImg.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Svibanj 2025 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

Analiza broja postova tijekom Svibnja 2025

Tijekom proslog mjeseca napisano je 380 postova na nasem boardu sto je odlicno povecanje aktivnosti u odnosu na Travanjske brojke (321 post) te je nastavak pozitvnog trenda koji traje vec mjesecima, od kad nam se pojavilo par novih clanova.

Na ovom chartu se vidi nas oporovak te napredak u zadnjih par mjeseci.

Analiza merita za Svibanj 2025

Tijekom Svibnja je podijeljeno 202 merita sto je solidan pad u odnosu na Travanj iako smo bili dosta aktivniji. Unatoc tome, mislim da je ta brojka i dalje dosta dobra s obzirom na kolicinu napisanih postova te i dalje imamo skroz pristojan merit/post ratio (0.53)

Lista svih koji su podijelili te primili merit na nasem boardu tijekom Svibnja, koja je za 3 clana kraca u odnosu na onu za Travanj. Ono sto se nije promjenilo su imena na vrhu: Pmalek je opet podijelio najvise dok je katanic97 primio najvise merita.

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Svibnja 2025

Unatoc povecanju broja postova od skoro 20% u odnosu na prethodno razdoblje, lista aktivnih clanova se nazalost nije povecala, nego naprotiv smanjila za jednog clana. Na vrhu je opet katanic97 koji je bio jos aktivniji nego mjesec ranije, na drugom mjestu je btcltcdigger, ja sam na trecem mjestu dok je drvena medalja ovaj put rezervirana za Pmaleka. Cheesy

1. katanic97 [63]
2. btcltcdigger [45]
3. Rikafip [38]
4. Pmalek [30]
5. Trofo [30]
6. dkbit98 [27]
7. slackovic [27]
8. cryptofrka [25]
9. examplens [24]
10. ovcijisir [23]
11. paco92x [11]
12. CroBoy12 [9]
13. SirJohnVonSlotty [7]
14. TalkativeCoin [7]
15. VoxelX [6]
16. Lunorael [3]
17. GazetaBitcoin [2]
18. FatFork [1]
19. VashaUdacha777 [1]
20. aquamarin13 [1]

Quote from: apogio on Today at 04:42:56 PM

Quote from: FlowCoin on Today at 09:20:41 AM

conducting a deal really zero KYC? Is that true? or there is a trigger system?

What kind of trigger? Triggers occur either automatically via algorithms or manually by people inspecting the transactions, but since there isn't any KYC or AML check, how can there be a trigger?

The only real "suspicion" that can make you worry (and I respect that) is the fact that, if you send the money upfront, the other party can run away with it. But, the purpose of this thread is to indicate that with Trevoid's swap service, I never had any doubt about my money being lost. *

* also read the disclaimer please

This is a 100% trust model.
I mean, we just trust and not verify.
Examplens has raised this issue and I didn't get the answer given him. Since Trevoid is in this thread, they could just answer. Must I be in contact with them for to perform a swap? Are we talking about offline swapping here?

Quote from: Pmalek on June 29, 2025, 07:02:06 AM

I nakon svih tih godina moda otkriju neku ranjivost koja je prisutna negdje u njihovom softveru. Uređaji koji imaju podršku, dobit će potrebne zakrpe a oni koji nemaju neće. Ako koristiš Ledger sa drugim softverskim novčanicima kao Electrum npr, moe se desiti da novi update Electruma dovede do neke nekompatibilnosti sa Ledger uređajima. Ledger bi onda popravio štetu kod novih uređaja ali ti ostaje stari Nano S koji više ne radi sa Electrumom. Bio bi prisiljen da koristiš stariju Electrum verziju i da je više ne nadograđuješ. Tako da ne moeš ni da koristiš šta god Electrum ili neki drugi wallet izbace u budućnosti.

Ne vjerujem da nakon toliko godina na najpopularnijem hardverskom novčaniku moe biti greška. To je pročešljano toliko puta...da išta postoji već bi bilo exploita. Također nisam od onih koji electrum instaliraju čim dođe nova zakrpa. Novo nije uvijek bolje pogotovo sa sigurnosnog aspekta. Radije ja pustim druge da testiraju to jedno godinu dana.

Osim naravno u slučaju nekog kritičnog vulrnabilitya.

Quote from: Pmalek on June 29, 2025, 07:02:06 AM

Veći update-i kod blockchaina ne bi imali podršku kod Nano S. Kao što examplens navede primjer Segwit-a ili Taproot nadogradnje. Moda Bitcoin kroz par godina pređe na algoritam koji će štititi mreu od kvantnih računara. Tu bi podršku Ledger morao omogučiti na svojim uređajima. Nano S je ne bi dobio. Zbog nedostatka memorije ne bi moda ni podravao novi algoritam jer bi se povečala veličina ključeva i potpisa na blockchainu.

Ovo već je razlog koji prihvaćam. Ali opet ne vjerujem da je algoritam za zaštitu od kvantnih računara moguće kvalitetno napraviti na postojećem hardveru. Nekako mislim da će nam trebati sasvim novi sigurnosni element u priči. Kada dođemo do toga, nekako mislim da će sweep na neki potpuno novi HW wallet biti jedino pravo riješenje. Da se razumijemo ovo je moj take na problem kojeg nisam uopće proučavao i priznajem da nisam dovoljno upućen.

Kvantna mehanika i kompjuteri su nešto što otvara sasvim nove grane znanosti i definitvno zasluuju dobar dio moje panje negdje u blioj budućnosti.

Quote from: examplens on June 29, 2025, 07:46:12 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on June 28, 2025, 08:09:43 AM

Quote from: Trêvoid on June 27, 2025, 10:29:34 PM

i believe these inconsistencies are usually due to the aggregator OrangeFren data refresh speed and the fast-moving nature of crypto prices

I've seen such inconsistencies too often to blame it on data refresh speed.

Whenever I use a site to compare rates at instant exchangers, I'm looking for the one that gives me (say) 0.2% better rates. If there's a 1% variation between what's shown and what I get, it's kinda pointless.

It's not just Orangefren, I remember seeing something similar on Bestchange and exchanges listed on there.

To test one of the exchanges, for example, Swapuz. I downloaded their affiliate widget and added it to one of my sites. Here is how the conversion of 0.1 ETH to USDT (trx) looks on my site and their official site
...

Big thanks to everyone who reported the rate differences!
We've had a closer look over the weekend and decided to impose a 1% correction on fees we get from Swapuz.

Currently we check for new rates as soon as we fetch the previous batch.
Bare in mind we also interpolate, we can't query every amount, after all. It also wouldn't be a good design for user privacy to send a request for a quote every time a user searches for a pair, because if any of the exchanges we list had their query history compromised it would make it possible to timing-attack our users. Even if they didn't use that particular service.

Quote from: examplens on June 27, 2025, 09:44:30 PM

This was the first thing that came to my mind. As far as I have had experience with Whale and withdrawal from their platform, I got the impression that they have the fastest withdrawal of all the casinos I have used. An incomplete withdrawal can only mean that some of the requirements have not been met, and it is probably possible that the wager requirements are involved.

A little advice based on my personal experience... if you want to withdraw a few thousand dollars (in any casino, not just Whale), then divide this amount by two and the probability that you will be asked for KYC or something like that will tend to zero (although I don't remember Whale asking anyone for KYC despite the fact that there are footnotes about it in the documentation).

The same applies to the speed of transaction processing. I would dare to assume that the smaller the amount of the withdrawal request, the less likely the system will redirect the request for manual verification.

Quote from: Lakai01 on Today at 08:24:42 AM

Are any of you betting on tomorrow's FIFA Club World Cup matches? [...]

Inter yes, an easy bet with good odds but I'm not sure about Real Madrid because Juventus can do miracles.

In fact, after I lost 3k dollars a week ago betting on Real Madrid, I'm not sure about anything anymore (it was supposed to be a very easy match). Maybe I would have thought again if I knew Mbappe would be in the game but as far as I can judge, he's in a hospital bed.

Quote from: examplens on June 29, 2025, 09:19:54 PM

Three years is not urgent. You also requested an urgent loan 3 years ago. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5388076.msg59409352#msg59409352
Still, you don't understand why you won't get a loan.
Here I repeat, there is no free money for you here. Maybe you'd get some money if it went to the doctors to help you.

Ofc he understands, but as he said, he doesn't care. He wants money at all costs and he knows that selling these items will not get him anything. Nobody will have any interest in these and from a person like him.
Perhaps his urgent need is to go to the doctor, but unfortunately for him, his illness can't be fixed with $200... Cheesy

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:25:34 AM

In the beginning, the idea was good, and the goal was to push members who lack a small number of merits for a rank upgrade. A little stimulus for younger members is perfectly fine and proof that the forum is not as rigid as newcomers perceive it to be.
As in everything, every good idea turns into its opposition at some point, so this thread has become a place where users beg for merit and possibly congratulations on rank-up. So instead of being a place where members will prove their quality, the opposite happened.

I will not blame it on the newbies but blame it on old members because you know how this forum works. If someone post about about the little amount of merit needed to rank up, as an old member, you do not need to merit his what he posted but just go throughout his topics and posts history and check for posts that are worth giving merit. If he is qualified, you can the person merit and also merit what he posted here if you feel like. For those that are not worth it, do not merit the person's posts.

It is good to know that some people will abuse this and use alt to also apply which is very bad, but as long as they are qualified, merit them but be strict in the merit is what that I think. I think anyone that is listing good will continue to earn merit even if they do not post on his thread. This is what these people do not know.

Quote from: examplens on June 29, 2025, 09:24:55 PM

Quote from: alani123 on June 29, 2025, 01:44:04 PM

I'm looking to see if any social media manager panel features decent Reddit services.

I'm trying to see if any SMM features decent services. I understand it's a bit of a niche market and maybe not so profitable but if you know anything let me know. You can also PM me with any info if you don't want to post it publicly. Thanks.

I'm not sure how many real offers there are here, but what appears are mostly resellers.
My advice to you is to look at the BHW forum. I have seen similar offers there; many of them have been officially tested by the forum administration or at least have enough feedback.
Certainly, Reddit is probably the most rigorous platform for any artificial hosting of posts or accounts, so be careful.

I know Reddit is very weird when it comes to using SMM services but I also know that it's possible to utilize such serviced that work.

Would you say BHW forum is trustworthy? Here in bitcointlak seniority and trust ratings actually mean something but I've had bad experiences in other forums. Thanks for the input. Feedback is very much appreciated.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:28:29 AM

Quote from: jvanname on June 29, 2025, 09:13:12 PM

But the people on this site (and everywhere else) are fucking evil, and they FUCKING HATE ME FOR BRINGING THIS UP! HUMANS ARE EVIL ROTTEN VIOLENCE PROMOTING PIECES OF SHIT WHO DESERVE EXTINCTION FOLLOWED BY ETERNAL DAMNATION!

Are the people from this site in the room with you now?

No.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Quote from: apogio on June 27, 2025, 03:25:22 PM

Quote from: Zwei on June 26, 2025, 02:26:32 PM

5% is not bad for BTC > XMR, eXch was charging the same if i remember right. hopefully once Trêvoid starts getting more volume, he would consider lowering the fee for other pairs to be more competitive.

Yeah 5% is not bad indeed. But depending on the coin, it could be variable. For example, I suppose 5% is reasonable for XMR, but is relatively high for ETH.

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 08:59:28 PM

If I understood correctly (I'm a little lazy to research it myself), it's a p2p swap? For each exchange, is direct communication with the seller necessary?
I have nothing against this method, but it can be tedious if it offers a high level of availability.

It works exactly like this. It's essentially like conducting a deal with someone in the forum's Currency Exchange section. It's good in my opinion. It maintains high levels of privacy.

hey there!

conducting a deal really zero KYC? Is that true? or there is a trigger system?

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:33:40 AM

Have you thought in the direction of creating an API that others could use for some additional tools or suggestions like the OP?

An API requires a database, which I don't have. BPIP for instance uses loyce.club/trust/latesttrustlist.txt to link to the most recent version of each user's Trust list (updated weekly), and user pages rely on weekly updated static data.

Quote from: AG0RA on June 29, 2025, 08:56:51 PM

Are you open to have someone else looking at the code and see how it can be improved, both from design and architecture perspective?

Maybe. But I'm not looking for more work for myself. Things work, I preserve my data, and at the moment it doesn't take too much of my time. Making big changes is something I simply don't have the time for. I'm basically locked-in now in the way things are.

Quote from: examplens on June 29, 2025, 09:01:50 PM

Quote from: AG0RA on June 29, 2025, 08:56:51 PM

Are you open to have someone else looking at the code and see how it can be improved, both from design and architecture perspective?

Even if he was open to sharing the code, I'm not sure how willing he would be to include someone else in development or improvement. Although I would not include anyone in this case. For example, after a while, you would get bored or simply wouldn't have time to continue with it, and he^LoyceV would have to fix yours in addition to his own code.

I was thinking the same thing. I think I'd be okay working with someone, but not someone who's been here for 3 months. That doesn't give any guarantee of a long-term commitment to Bitcointalk.

Quote from: AG0RA on June 29, 2025, 09:18:26 PM

As a newbie, I find a lot of useful info there...

Have you tried [β] BPIP Extension: user info & extra features add-on/extension, Firefox/Chrome? I don't use it myself, but it makes accessing loyce.club a bit easier. Just like I often use BPIP.org to find the link to their Trust list on loyce.club.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:05:21 PM

The bottom line is that the exchangers have smoothly distanced themselves from the whole problem and do not offer any help to the OP in solving it. So they are only there when they need to take a percentage of the order.
Why would anyone use them later? It's simpler to go directly to Whitebit, probably the client will have more chances.

Based on various previous similar reports of this type, it is noticeable that most exchangers on Bestchange are Whitebit resellers.

Yeah, you’re absolutely right, most of the exchangers listed on BestChange are just WhiteBIT resellers.

The only real “advantage” they offer over going directly through WhiteBIT is that you don’t need to create an account or go through KYC.

But it turns out there are exceptions to that too… and apparently, they’re pretty common.

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 08:06:48 PM

Quote from: Swapuz on June 25, 2025, 06:11:06 PM

In this environment, privacy-focused and decentralized solutions are gaining traction. Swapuz offers a simple way to exchange cryptocurrencies without KYC or registration — with a focus on Monero, Zcash, Dero, and other privacy coins. It addresses the growing demand for sovereign financial tools.

I have used Swapuz several times, no KYC required. Before the first transaction, support confirmed to me after an AML check on their part, that my coins are safe and will not require any additional conditions.

Somehow, I understood that Swapuz uses its own liquidity. However, it would be good to get an official explanation for the earlier claims of connection with Changenow. This would have a greater impact on creating trust than posting meaningless news about the market.

I have contacted Swapuz on chat several times, but their AML verification system (or something like that) is "temporarily unavailable" for quite some time (i even tried today).

Swapuz looks a solid alternative to eXch, and I really want to send some coins there, but I need to be safe on the AML side because I don't wanna do KYC.

Fees are really good and I will be glad to become a customer

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:33:38 PM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:58:03 PM

For example, the unedited (or deleted) posts page for a user with a large number of posts is quite tiring to use, even for the browser itself.

That's true. I only use that page to open a bunch of links in new tabs, other than that, it doesn't really have a function.

Quote

I assume you're doing everything as a hobby, but what's the point of a tool if it complicates its use.

It got out of hand Tongue

I never expected to store this much data when I started all this.

Are you open to have someone else looking at the code and see how it can be improved, both from design and architecture perspective?

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:58:03 PM

For example, the unedited (or deleted) posts page for a user with a large number of posts is quite tiring to use, even for the browser itself.

That's true. I only use that page to open a bunch of links in new tabs, other than that, it doesn't really have a function.

Quote

I assume you're doing everything as a hobby, but what's the point of a tool if it complicates its use.

It got out of hand Tongue

I never expected to store this much data when I started all this.

Quote from: Trofo on June 28, 2025, 10:57:26 AM

Jel mi moe neko objasniti zašto je nedostatak podrške problem?

Ja ne elim da mi netko aurira ledger više. Komad hardvera star toliko godina već je dobio sve bitne zakrpe. Jednom sam ga aurirao prije par godina i to je to. BMK šta ledger radi, meni oni više ne trabaju a nakon onih updatea za seed recovery sigurno neću njihov app koristiti ili bilo šta.

I nakon svih tih godina moda otkriju neku ranjivost koja je prisutna negdje u njihovom softveru. Uređaji koji imaju podršku, dobit će potrebne zakrpe a oni koji nemaju neće. Ako koristiš Ledger sa drugim softverskim novčanicima kao Electrum npr, moe se desiti da novi update Electruma dovede do neke nekompatibilnosti sa Ledger uređajima. Ledger bi onda popravio štetu kod novih uređaja ali ti ostaje stari Nano S koji više ne radi sa Electrumom. Bio bi prisiljen da koristiš stariju Electrum verziju i da je više ne nadograđuješ. Tako da ne moeš ni da koristiš šta god Electrum ili neki drugi wallet izbace u budućnosti.

Veći update-i kod blockchaina ne bi imali podršku kod Nano S. Kao što examplens navede primjer Segwit-a ili Taproot nadogradnje. Moda Bitcoin kroz par godina pređe na algoritam koji će štititi mreu od kvantnih računara. Tu bi podršku Ledger morao omogučiti na svojim uređajima. Nano S je ne bi dobio. Zbog nedostatka memorije ne bi moda ni podravao novi algoritam jer bi se povečala veličina ključeva i potpisa na blockchainu.

Quote from: examplens on June 28, 2025, 08:45:55 PM

Quote from: bitmover on June 28, 2025, 08:18:16 PM

Have anyone ever tried to bump a fee of a transaction using cce.cash?

I am a bit affraid that bumping might cause some error. And the transaction is taking long to confirm.

My first time using CCE.CASH. I will tell share my experience when it is over Grin

Two things are important: whether the exchange recognizes the incoming transaction and how the service behaves in case of two transactions in the same order.

The FAQ does not say too much about similar situations, but it refers to the support contact to possibly start the transaction manually in case the order has expired.

Code:

2. What should I do if my order expired?
If your transaction has not arrived before the order time has passed, you can contact Customer Service:

Continue the exchange at a floating rate. The order will be executed after the transaction is received and the required number of network confirmations is received.

Make a refund of the amount sent for the exchange minus the network fee. To do this, you need to specify your address, to which the coins will be returned after receiving your transaction.

Here are the answers to your questions:
1. CCE Cash will automatically recognize the transaction
2. If you deposit multiple amounts in a single order, you can contact online customer service for help.

Quote from: examplens on June 27, 2025, 10:01:16 PM

Quote from: rdbase on June 27, 2025, 09:51:03 PM

I am slowly believing that he won't create a cryptocurrency since that would come with legal action against him as if he doesn't need anymore reasons to go into court for a memecoin.
I think he will adapt a stablecoin siince it wouldn't come with any legal baggage beind it being politically backed with whichever way he decides to go. USDC, USD1 or TUSD.

He did not create his cryptocurrency because he feels that now is not the best time to do so. He doesn't want to try if he can't get the most out of it. What works for him is his experience with the Trump coin, and in terms of popularity, he is equally or maybe even more popular than Trump in the crypto community.
It will probably be something similar, with the shortcomings that the Trump coin had corrected, while Musk probably wants it to be a little more serious story, at least apparently with some purpose.

Opening a full scale cryptocurrency at this moment would indeed be a risky business to undertake given the aggressive nature of regulators. Musk is a clever guy, and he understands that the right timing is everything. A stable coin is better to him provided he wants something practical and less confrontational and more so this is pegged on a big currency and it is accompanied with a certain sort of partnership and regulatory approval and yeah he has a massive influence in the world of the crypto. He even does not need to issue a coin and by a single tweet he can cause markets to shift. I think when and should he do release something he will do it in a larger ecosystem like X or one of his companies not a meme token.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:27:37 AM

Quote from: examplens on June 26, 2025, 09:50:51 PM

Ledgerov nacin poslovanja me veoma podseca na Microsoft. Puni su bezbednosnih propusta, pri tom ocekuju da korisnici tek tako kupuju njihove nove proizvode, jer eto oni prestaju davati podrsku starim uredjajima.

Ljudi zaboravljaju da tako funckioniše trište elektronike. Nano S si platio €50 ili €100 (ne znam kako im se cijena kretala kroz historiju) i imao je podršku kompanije nekih 9 godina. Koliko si u tom periodi mobitela promjenio koji su koštali mnogo više? Kupiš flagship mobitel od €700 i on ti za pet godina nema više slubenu podršku i softverske nadogradnje. A moda i ranije. Stari dedo Trezor Model One i Trezor općenito igraju po svojim pravilima.

Jel mi moe neko objasniti zašto je nedostatak podrške problem?

Ja ne elim da mi netko aurira ledger više. Komad hardvera star toliko godina već je dobio sve bitne zakrpe. Jednom sam ga aurirao prije par godina i to je to. BMK šta ledger radi, meni oni više ne trabaju a nakon onih updatea za seed recovery sigurno neću njihov app koristiti ili bilo šta.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (53) 13348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3742 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1712 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 65636: babo (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3954 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (4) 7957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 7626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1436 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 123824: albon (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1561 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 153634: dbshck (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (9) 6229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2410 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 11385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6338 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +132 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3790 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3211 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 10696 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 10550 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1961 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 18122 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6101 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2722 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1980 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 740502: condoras (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 653 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1218 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 418 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1428 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3370 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2978 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +50 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5988 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +92 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1691 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1045971: Igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1976 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1965 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +69 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (32) 10626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1159 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2004 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 8316 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3367 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2162 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3113 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2601 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 18464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2114 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2313 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +24 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 4806 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1983110: mendace (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 626 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 7325 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2830 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3699 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 778 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4952 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 7078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2718725: Lachrymose (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 8619 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4945 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5625 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2650 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 635 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +4 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (7640 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (802 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 203: HostFat (Trust: neutral) (250 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 11275: wariner (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (8392 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 13813: smooth (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 18640: SebastianJu (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (83 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 18953: Stemby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 19971: -ck (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (664 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 20300: Otoh (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (246 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 20651: coblee (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (356 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 23092: malevolent (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (362 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: examplens on June 26, 2025, 09:50:51 PM

Ledgerov nacin poslovanja me veoma podseca na Microsoft. Puni su bezbednosnih propusta, pri tom ocekuju da korisnici tek tako kupuju njihove nove proizvode, jer eto oni prestaju davati podrsku starim uredjajima.

Ljudi zaboravljaju da tako funckioniše trište elektronike. Nano S si platio €50 ili €100 (ne znam kako im se cijena kretala kroz historiju) i imao je podršku kompanije nekih 9 godina. Koliko si u tom periodi mobitela promjenio koji su koštali mnogo više? Kupiš flagship mobitel od €700 i on ti za pet godina nema više slubenu podršku i softverske nadogradnje. A moda i ranije. Stari dedo Trezor Model One i Trezor općenito igraju po svojim pravilima.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:46:45 AM

I'm still not sure if you're just a troll or if you have some kind of mental impairment. It is simply impossible for a mentally stable person to do what you have been doing here for years.
Whatever it is, you need a medical examination and adequate therapy.

At this point, I think he is faced with mental apocalypse or something like that. I have received PMs from OP more than twice asking for a loan, even when he very well knows that I could never lend him even a cent. For some reason, his brain still tells him that he can get anything from here.

No sane person who behave like that. Not even a troll Grin

Quote from: Zwei on June 26, 2025, 02:26:32 PM

5% is not bad for BTC > XMR, eXch was charging the same if i remember right. hopefully once Trêvoid starts getting more volume, he would consider lowering the fee for other pairs to be more competitive.

Yeah 5% is not bad indeed. But depending on the coin, it could be variable. For example, I suppose 5% is reasonable for XMR, but is relatively high for ETH.

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 08:59:28 PM

If I understood correctly (I'm a little lazy to research it myself), it's a p2p swap? For each exchange, is direct communication with the seller necessary?
I have nothing against this method, but it can be tedious if it offers a high level of availability.

It works exactly like this. It's essentially like conducting a deal with someone in the forum's Currency Exchange section. It's good in my opinion. It maintains high levels of privacy.

Quote from: examplens on June 26, 2025, 09:50:51 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on June 26, 2025, 03:42:49 PM

Nisam na forumu pročitao informaciju da je Ledger najavio da planiraju da penzionišu Nano S u drugom dijelu ove godine i da će prestati podrška za ovaj njihov trenutno najstariji hardverski novčanik. Preporučuju korisnicima i developerima da pređu na jedan od njihovih novijih uređaja (naravno Roll Eyes

) i da očekuju da će buduće funkcije i nadogradnje biti nedostupne za Nano S zbog njegovih raznih nedostataka i manjka interne memorije.

Ledgerov nacin poslovanja me veoma podseca na Microsoft. Puni su bezbednosnih propusta, pri tom ocekuju da korisnici tek tako kupuju njihove nove proizvode, jer eto oni prestaju davati podrsku starim uredjajima. Sad

Jedino sto ih drzi, je to sto su medju prvima u hardware wallet industriji, pa su postali dosta prepoznatljivi.
Ovo bih im dodao kao jos jedan minus u hrpi "zasto ne Ledger" razloga.

Ja sam super zadovoljan s ledgerom nano s i ne mislim ga mijenjati dok ne krepa. Ionako ne vjerujem njihovom softveru tako da ga koristim u kombinaciji s electrumom i to radi perfektno. Nista vise mi ne treba.

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 07:33:16 AM

Quote from: Trêvoid on Today at 06:17:24 AM

Hello @examplens yes, you understood it right. it’s basically a peer-to-peer (p2p) swap.

Do you have the ability to exchange BTC to USDT, and what are the fees?
Do you have your own liquidity or use exchanges in the background?
Can you go first with trusted members?

Hello @hugeblack, thanks for your interest in our service!

We charge a standard 5% fee per swap, it can vary depending on the deal size.

For USDT, it depends on the amount. I don’t usually offer a lot, but in the past, some of my long-term clients have asked for it, and I’ve helped them out from time to time.

I maintain my own crypto stock. That means I provide my own liquidity and don’t use any centralized exchanges.

Please get in touch with me on SimpleX so we can discuss further!

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 10:02:08 PM

btw. I've checked, swapping 0.01 BTC to USDT (ERC20), the first two "best" results are OctoSwap and Hellex. However, in real exchanges, they offer a much worse exchange rate.

I checked just now and they seemed ok, I'll keep an eye out for it.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 07:32:45 AM

Suggestion: When I search to exchange a certain amount, you link to the site with a referral id. But what's missing in the link is the trade pair I'm looking for, so I have to enter it again on the site. Could you add the trade pair to the link? That's what your competitor does.

We already do that for some exchanges, but most don't support it. We'll reach out to their teams and ask if there's an undocumented way of doing it.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 07:32:45 AM

Suggestion: your drop-down menu with coins has many duplicates: BTC is in there 5 times, LTC 4 times, and more. That list should be a lot shorter.

Ah, you're right! That's odd. On it.

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 07:33:16 AM

Quote from: Trêvoid on Today at 06:17:24 AM

Hello @examplens yes, you understood it right. it’s basically a peer-to-peer (p2p) swap.

Do you have the ability to exchange BTC to USDT, and what are the fees?
Do you have your own liquidity or use exchanges in the background?
Can you go first with trusted members?

I think he charges 5%, and I see positive reviews from https://kycnot.me/service/trevoid-crypto-swaps?showPending=true&sort=upvotes#comments, and you need to pay first.

I think in most of the exchanges, you need to deposit first before making any swap.

Quote from: Trêvoid on Today at 06:17:24 AM

Hello @examplens yes, you understood it right. it’s basically a peer-to-peer (p2p) swap.

Do you have the ability to exchange BTC to USDT, and what are the fees?
Do you have your own liquidity or use exchanges in the background?
Can you go first with trusted members?

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 08:59:28 PM

The closure of eXch is a great loss for the true crypto community, but it certainly opens up space for new opportunities.

Quote from: apogio on June 25, 2025, 09:38:08 AM

My experience with them
How it works:
I have tried exchanging 3 cryptocurrencies (XMR, ETH and BTC).
The way it worked was that I was contacting Trêvoid on the forum via PM, or in their SimpleX chat.
I was only telling them what currency I had, what currency I needed and how much I wanted to exchange.
Then, it took approximately 5 minutes to finish the swap.

If I understood correctly (I'm a little lazy to research it myself), it's a p2p swap? For each exchange, is direct communication with the seller necessary?
I have nothing against this method, but it can be tedious if it offers a high level of availability.

Hello @examplens yes, you understood it right. it’s basically a peer-to-peer (p2p) swap.

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 08:59:28 PM

The closure of eXch is a great loss for the true crypto community, but it certainly opens up space for new opportunities.

Quote from: apogio on June 25, 2025, 09:38:08 AM

My experience with them
How it works:
I have tried exchanging 3 cryptocurrencies (XMR, ETH and BTC).
The way it worked was that I was contacting Trêvoid on the forum via PM, or in their SimpleX chat.
I was only telling them what currency I had, what currency I needed and how much I wanted to exchange.
Then, it took approximately 5 minutes to finish the swap.

If I understood correctly (I'm a little lazy to research it myself), it's a p2p swap? For each exchange, is direct communication with the seller necessary?
I have nothing against this method, but it can be tedious if it offers a high level of availability.

I'm building something close to eXch.cx i will be rolling it out soon.

Quote from: examplens on June 25, 2025, 09:05:38 PM

Retko proveravam SirJohna, mozda bi trebao poceti Cheesy

Nikad me nisi volio :<

We are almost halfway through this year, so it deserved a little update.

Pos	Users	24/06/2025
1	Woodie	3 008,97
2	paid2	1 252,59
3	internetional	1 099,88
	Bitcoin	1 059,28
4	Halab	987,83
5	LoyceV	975,08
6	GazetaBitcoin	919,53
7	sompitonov	867,63
8	ajiz138	866,55
9	DireWolfM14	785,67
10	examplens	760,67
11	rat03gopoh	743,21
12	memehunter	739,55
13	n0nce	708,34
	Average	652,56
14	GrosWesh	649,64
15	DYING_S0UL	572,18
16	FinneysTrueVision	564,95
17	shahzadafzal	561,87
18	B1g4udge	557,75
19	Smartprofit	555,00
20	jokers10	553,38
21	tokeweed	550,97
22	LogitechMouse	549,00
23	SamReomo	531,76
24	Despairo	521,06
25	icopress	515,98
26	bitmover	503,99
27	famososMuertos	485,73
28	klarki	481,61
29	Rikafip	473,08
30	Taskford	472,64
31	Saint-loup	463,15
32	Koal-84	383,42
33	xandry	380,01
	Random_but_balanced	357,48
34	libert19	314,52
35	worldofcoins	311,70
36	cryptofrka	304,67
37	Buchi-88	301,44
38	slackovic	289,93
39	arallmuus	283,85
40	xLays	253,52

Line chart race : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/

The time has come for another brief monthly overview of the local boards activity, this time for May 2025. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bangladesh) unfortunately still don't have their own local boards.

Post activity per local board during May 2025

During the last month, 12794 posts were written across 18 local boards which is an increase compared to April's numbers (12356). Russian local board remained at the top, but Nigerian is coming closer month after month and its just a matter of time before they overtake them.

Active members per local board during May 2025

During May, 1241 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local board which is a slight increase compared to month before (1236 during May), which is not a surprise given the increase in the amont of posts as well. In this chart Russian still has big advantage over the others, but we will see how that develops.

Local board members per amount of posts during May 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Romanian is the leader with 63%, while in the same time Pilipinas has only 9% of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket leader is the French local board with 55%, while on the other side Polish local has only 20% of the members who wrote between 2-9 posts.

And regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian local is the leader with 55% and at the bottom its Romanian local with only 13% of the members who wrote 10+ posts.

Merit shared per local board during May 2025

During the above mentioned period 7479 merit was sent acorss local boards that are part of this overview, which makes it a huge increase compared to April's numbers (5873). German local board is back at the top after poor Aoril's performance, narrowly beating Nigerian local while Russian local dropped to for them unusually low 3rd spot.

Majority of the local boards shared more merit than in April, with Nigerian local sticking out (904-1663). At the same time, Indonesian has a big decrease (from 619 down to 304).

Merit/Post ratio per local board during May 2025

During May , the average merit per post ratio for local board was 0.58, meaning a big increase compared to April (0.48).

Romanian board is kinda messing up this chart once again, this time with even higher merit/post ratio than last month (just to add that this is not too unusual for less active boards) followed far behind by German local board, while at the same time Pilipinas remiend the dead last wityh only 0.1 merit per post.

Given the recently appointed merit sources in many local boards, I expect this chart to looks much different in the next overview.

Merit senders and receivers per local board during May 2025

During May, 503 members sent while 620 received merit in once of the local boards, which is (an expected) increase compared to April (519 senders/579 receivers). Despite being 2nd on merit amount chart, Nigerian local dominates this chart, leaving all others far behind, and you can say that Indonesian also performed well consdiering their amount of merit sent.

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during May 2025

Considering their crazy high merit per post ratio, no surprise to see Romanian board once again at the top with 52% of merited post, while far more active Nigerian, German and Italian are behind at around 30% mark.

Merit per transaction across local boards during May 2025

Last but not the least, chart that shows meriting habits of local boards. Here we have Greek local board sticking due fact that they only had 2 merit transaction during may, causing this unrealistically high merit per transaction value, while Romanian (another less active local board) also had unrealistically high number.

The most active members per local board during May 2025

And in the end, list of the most active local boards members. This time two members from Russian local board were the most active ones; klarki with 175 and jokers10 with 169 posts while joker_josue from Portuguese local board was 3rd with 152 posts written in his local druing last month. Keep it up guys!
.

Russian	\|	German	\|	Turkish	\|	Italian	\|	Portuguese	\|	Spanish	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. klarki [175]	\|	1. MaxMueller [113]	\|	1. yenerbatmaz [94]	\|	1. babo [89]	\|	1. joker_josue [152]	\|	1. famososMuertos [56]	\|
2. jokers10 [169]	\|	2. Lakai01 [99]	\|	2. mandown [87]	\|	2. Ale88 [72]	\|	2. bitmover [91]	\|	2. Don Pedro Dinero [46]	\|
3. Julien_Olynpic [133]	\|	3. cygan [80]	\|	3. blomen [77]	\|	3. giorgione [60]	\|	3. TryNinja [77]	\|	3. Hispo [41]	\|
4. zasad@ [94]	\|	4. Soonandwaite [79]	\|	4. execijutiere [61]	\|	4. fillippone [55]	\|	4. Forsyth Jones [59]	\|	4. sausalitox [31]	\|
5. xandry [88]	\|	5. Real-Duke [75]	\|	5. Mustang Shelby [60]	\|	5. xenomorfo [49]	\|	5. tg88 [55]	\|	5. Porfirii [29]	\|
6. Alex077 [85]	\|	6. Unknown01 [59]	\|	6. ajanwalker [56]	\|	6. Plutosky [44]	\|	6. Pumared [50]	\|	6. darbitmobilerecovery [23]	\|
7. safar1980 [74]	\|	7. Koal-84 [52]	\|	7. RaltcoinsB [57]	\|	7. Lillominato89 [38]	\|	7. r_victory [33]	\|	7. seoincorporation [21]	\|
8. Numeral [58]	\|	8. Buchi-88 [51]	\|	8. RaltcoinsB [57]	\|	8. gbianchi [34]	\|	8. mikel_012 [32]	\|	8. d5000 [19]	\|
9. mak013 [57]	\|	9. MinoRaiola [48]	\|	9. ajanwalker [56]	\|	9. bastisisca [31]	\|	9. non fungible anxiety [32]	\|	9. Drawesome [15]	\|
10. eisen33 [53]	\|	10. willi9974 [47]	\|	10. Hvdv [52]	\|	10. bitbollo [26]	\|	10. Mindyspace [31]	\|	10. darxiaomi [14]	\|

Indonesian	\|	French	\|	Pilipinas	\|	Croatian	\|	Nigerian	\|	Arabic
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. Chikito [90]	\|	1. Becassine [21]	\|	1. Peanutswar [41]	\|	1. katanic97 [63]	\|	1. Charles-Tim [60]	\|	1. Kavelj22 [30]
2. punk.zink [44]	\|	2. patrickus [20]	\|	2. gunhell16 [34]	\|	2. btcltcdigger [45]	\|	2. Joy- maker [43]	\|	2. khaled0111 [27]
3. Husna QA [42]	\|	3. Danydee [19]	\|	3. cryptoaddictchie [33]	\|	3. Rikafip [38]	\|	3. Africolo [41]	\|	3. yhiaali3 [25]
4. mu_enrico [34]	\|	4. Saint-loup [8]	\|	4. Mr. Magkaisa [30]	\|	4. Pmalek [30]	\|	4. Sonia_123 [35]	\|	4. satoshyat.team [19]
5. MAAManda [31]	\|	5. G.Seed [6]	\|	5. GreatArkansas [25]	\|	5. Trofo [30]	\|	5. Tonimez [34]	\|	5. GxSTxV [16]
6. Luzin [29]	\|	6. tuxo [6]	\|	6. PX-Z [24]	\|	6. dkbit98 [27]	\|	6. Josefjix [33]	\|	6. OmegaStarScream [8]
7. joniboini [25]	\|	7. Halab [4]	\|	7. serjent05 [24]	\|	7. slackovic [27]	\|	7. Mate2237 [32]	\|	7. Privatus [8]
8. len01 [25]	\|	8. coupable [4]	\|	8. Fredomago [22]	\|	8. cryptofrka [25]	\|	8. CryptoHeadlineNews [30]	\|	8. albon [4]
9. armanda90 [23]	\|	9. Angroid [2]	\|	9. bhadz [22]	\|	9. examplens [24]	\|	9. POPOLUV [28]	\|	9. Ochan_yazo_tochant [3]
10. Rashlyowl [22]	\|	10. GrosWesh [2]	\|	10. blockman [22]	\|	10. ovcijisir [23]	\|	10. Princess Leah [28]	\|	10. hugeblack [3]

Polish	\|	Indian	\|	Greek	\|	Romanian	\|	Pakistan*	\|	Bengali*	\|
_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|	_________________	\|
1. cygan [27]	\|	1. IIrik11 [26]	\|	1. condoras [19]	\|	1. GazetaBitcoin [14]	\|	1. qurbanshah02 [39]	\|	1. DYING_S0UL [22]	\|
2. pawel7777 [4]	\|	2. JSRAW [25]	\|	2. Ultegra134 [14]	\|	2. NeuroticFish [4]	\|	2. JunaidAzizi [35]	\|	2. Nothingtodo [19]	\|
3. bitbartek [1]	\|	3. Bitcoin Smith [14]	\|	3. coctailnuts [6]	\|	3. UsdtBucuresti [2]	\|	3. GbitG [25]	\|	3. Bd officer [18]	\|
4. shual1982als [1]	\|	4. TheUltraElite [8]	\|	4. apogio [4]	\|	4. IonCreanga [1]	\|	4. Cheema02 [22]	\|	4. Shishir99 [16]	\|
5. stwenhao [1]	\|	5. M47AK16 [5]	\|	5. BitcoinsGreece [3]	\|	5. amsterdamlucian [1]	\|	5. MusaPk [22]	\|	5. Crypto Library [12]	\|
	\|	6. henry1111 [4]	\|	6. changlee [2]	\|	6. ethanhunt2023 [1]	\|	6. Rustam Meraj [22]	\|	6. HelliumZ [12]	\|
	\|	7. libert19 [4]	\|	7. Dimitris [1]	\|	7. jedaite [1]	\|	7. ZAINmalik75 [22]	\|	7. LDL [12]	\|
	\|	8. GazetaBitcoin [3]	\|	8. RnBMC.official [1]	\|	8. shinotabu28u [1]	\|	8. Publictalk792 [16]	\|	8. Bluedrem [11]	\|
	\|	9. Mastercon [2]	\|	9. alani123 [1]	\|		\|	9. UmerIdrees [15]	\|	9. Mahiyammahi [11]	\|
	\|	10. Orange89 [2]	\|	10. mastercryptogr [1]	\|		\|	10. Compromise me [14]	\|	10. Hossain Risfa [9]	\|

Quote from: examplens on June 24, 2025, 11:03:33 PM

Na tvom mestu, vise bih se potrudio oko sopstvenih postova da te primeti i ostatak foruma (izvan ovog lokala) po kvalitetu, ne bih se previse zamarao 'tudjim' postovima.

Pa koliko vidim i nije dijelio tuđe postove nego samo svoje.
Mislim da je SirJohn samo generalno govorio.

Quote from: examplens on June 22, 2025, 07:11:30 PM

Quote from: BitDrift on June 20, 2025, 07:29:54 PM

I’m not sure why I’m even responding, since it seems like you’ve already made up your mind. But just to clarify... when I started with Bucksbus, I didn’t pay 35K upfront. I began with their standard rate of 0.3% on transaction volume. I only decided to purchase the transaction package after trying the service, as they told me I could switch whenever I felt ready.

You don't seem sincere about the fact that you need a payment processor; you're acting more like shilling for Bucksbus.

If you are looking for a solution, I suggest you look at MixPay http://mixpay.me/
Zero Fees for Merchants, Zero Gas Fees for Users, Cross-Chain Conversion, no KYC...

Hey, thanks for the suggestion. I'm not affiliated with anyone, the only reason I started this thread was because I couldn’t find much info about their service. But by the time I got a reply, I had already decided to try them out.

Quote from: examplens on June 21, 2025, 08:29:11 PM

Quote from: SatStrike on June 21, 2025, 05:59:29 PM

Quote from: coin-investor on June 20, 2025, 11:17:24 PM

Quote from: SatStrike on June 20, 2025, 09:00:06 AM

PS: I initially posted this in the gambling section but was recommended to post it here since it really is not a casino or gambling site at all which I totally agree with. Also, it is a passion project of mine that I work on in my free time and not a business. Just wanted to get this out of the way, since a lot of people in the gambling section expected it to be a business with 24/7 support. I will do my best to answer all requests here though.

First you are the developer of this platform so you should be the one to know the classification of your platform if you think that this is a gambling platform then defend it's place in the board, second this is a developer section where new projects are in beta and alpha phase.

Vod is right in his opinion that its doesn't belong here, there's another section where your platform belongs and this is the MicroEarnings
I saw some platforms similar to yours so check if you think that's the best section ofr your platform.

It's definitely not a gambling site. Gambling is defined as a game of chance. This is clearly a skills based game and therefore not a casino or anything similar. Nonetheless, the other available sections did also not seem right for me, hence I posted in gambling first. I will have a look at Micro Earnings though.
In any case, the people over at gambling recommended this as the right section.

Yes, it sounds more like a micro earning service, like various faucets with different methods of claiming rewards.
How fatherly you planned the monetization so that the service could be functional on its own without constant investment in the bankroll?

Hi, not sure I completely understand the question? Could you rephrase it?

Quote from: r_victory on June 21, 2025, 08:44:53 PM

It's a simple game, I don't see how it could keep someone playing for a long time. If you tell me it's just an MVP, that's fine, I can overlook a lot of things, but if it's the final product, I saw a problem that, in my opinion, makes me suspicious. Who is the wallet being held by? By you? Since you said you're a technology lover, you could create an integration for the player to connect their own wallet and maybe even charge a small fee to keep the project active. I don't see any problem in wanting to profit from something that took time, knowledge, and money to maintain (hosting, domain, etc.).

You could base it on some of these games, they are simple but with a look that might be more interesting for players: https://poki.com/en/tanks

Thank you, very appreciated. It's certainly some kind of MVP. Further development depends a bit on my time and general user interest though. Regarding the wallet, if you are very paranoid, you could just only keep enough there to pay for a single game and then withdraw. That you can keep more than that is just a convenience feature. In the first version, you had to pay before every game which was a bit more cumbersome. Wallet integrations is certainly something I have on the roadmap though not but with extremely high prio. If you just have a couple hundred sats there, the risk is limited in my opinion but of course everyone needs to decide themselves.

Quote from: Vod on June 21, 2025, 09:27:23 PM

Quote from: r_victory on June 21, 2025, 08:44:53 PM

Who is the wallet being held by? By you? Since you said you're a technology lover, you could create an integration for the player to connect their own wallet and maybe even charge a small fee to keep the project active.

He claims it's a passion project for the lightning network. Yet the amount of time he spent on coding the lightning part was negligible. When you lose your coin on this platform, I would expect the customer support to be as honest as the announcement.

Everyone here knows I protect real projects from being saturated with scam projects, so I have tagged the OP after he ignored warnings.

Quote from: SatStrike on June 21, 2025, 05:59:29 PM

See me comment above. Not gambling.

See a dictionary. Gambling.

How would you know how much time I spent on a feature? Cheesy

On gambling, Wikipedia says: Gambling is the wagering of something of value on a random event with the intent of winning something else of value.
There is no randomness in the game aside from map layout generation. It is not gambling, no matter how often you claim the opposite.

Quote from: BitMaxz on June 21, 2025, 11:41:11 PM

I agree with the post above; it's still gambling because it requires a fee to win something. It isn't earning for free; you are still risking something to be able to earn the pot. There's no big difference in playing digital poker that's based on skill-based games and considered gambling.

Look at this image:

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/22/UuNdXD.png

Even if it is player vs. player, it has a fee of 10 sats to 50 sats. The free one is the training ground with a pot of 0 sats. Training ground is supposed to be just your demo.

I tried to play the demo one with a bot, and honestly, it's hard to win on the game. Once I got hit by the enemy bullet, I lost immediately, but when I tried to attack the bot and got hit multiple times, it didn't die, and my bullets are limited to, I guess, 10 shots; it will reload for more than 3 seconds and lots of movement delays.

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/22/UuNwhZ.png

The tank retro game is way better to play than this.

Thank you for your feedback. Well, it should not be easy to win but when you hit the bot it should definitely die immediately. I have not encountered this situation so far. Can you describe in more detail how it happened?

Quote from: askii on June 22, 2025, 02:02:55 PM

I think OP probably has good intentions with their project, but maybe hasn't presented or framed it in the best way (gambling issue etc).

At the end of the day, I think trust is the biggest issue, and a game like this is likely (regrettably) better suited to a blockchain with more advanced smart contracting abilities, where management of the pots can be fully trustless and fair.

With regards to the game itself - there is fairly significant input lag that I'm confident is not just me. I'm guessing client inputs are sent to the server and the game is only updated to reflect the server state? You should implement client side prediction and interpolate the client state with the server state, so the player can get immediate feedback for their actions. For such a simple game, it shouldn't be too much of a headache, and it'll make the gameplay feel a lot more smooth

Thank you very much. Yes, your assumption is absolutely correct. Inputs are sent to the server where the state is updated and then updates are communicated back to the client. Client-side prediction is something I have on the roadmap.

But yeah, depends a bit on my time. It's funny, I released a v1 of it a while ago with mostly positive feedback on another site. v2 here is like v1 just with some convenience features added but feedback is mostly negative for basically the same game. ^^

I will think a bit about it.

My view is that it is such a low stakes scenario that increasing trustlessness really does not matter that much. Each player will at most risk a couple cents worth of money. Even if there were thousands or tens of thousands of players (a very very very optimistic scenario) there would be maybe a couple hundred dollars circulating on the platform. If someone wanted to scam people, this would be really one of the most inefficient ways imaginable to do it imo.

It should be a fun and casual browser game. For that the gameplay should be responsive and entertaining. The latter part was where I got quite some positive feedback from people who actually played with friends or other real players in v1. The first part is definitely something to be improved, I agree.