Last update: 2026-04-20_Mon_03.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66635530 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Apr 20 03:04:01 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
The price is doing much better, I think. It failed to hit the targets that most of us predicted, but I still have hopes for it, haha, as I bought some near $3500, haha. Is there anyone else who bought in this range?
Quite by chance, I sold at $3600+ at the end of 2024. It turned out to be one of the better decisions, although I did not plan to sell, more because of the cash out, and ETH seemed the most uninteresting to me.
I sold about half of my position at 3500 and converted a smaller amount to btc.
I regret not selling all the eth stash, but I still had some hope.
I am still holding now some eth. I am waiting for a good opportunity to sell more or convert to btc
2. Post 66634872 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 22:56:19 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Let's go back to on topic.
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.
It does not seem very difficult to read to me but they could definitely make the text more visible when the mouse hovers over it. Like this,
3. Post 66634364 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 20:24:55 CEST 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
The eternal dilemma is which AML checker is the most reliable.
Mine
We use an enterprise endpoint for the address queries, so now there is zero downtime. And prices are still pretty cheap!
As far as I understand from experience, a 30% risk score is still not critical. That is, until AML tools recognise stolen coins or those from one of the known hacks. Everything else that brings bad points (mixers, unlicensed exchanges) when calculating the AML score, no serious service pays much attention to it.
Just keep it under 25% any you'll be good. 30% you might get away with it but ehhhh... I wouldn't risk it.
4. Post 66634222 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 19:44:55 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.
It's too dark actually, in mobile mode these updates are placed under the exchange card/box so they look good but in desktop i guess it needed to be placed under as well or some other pages like update pages.
I even go out of my way to highlight it with my mouse so the font turns white on a blue background - that makes it easier on the eyes. It’s clear that the website’s design concept is centered around the name, which is why dark tones dominate. But it’s now become popular on many platforms to offer both dark and light versions of a site, depending on the user’s preference. I usually choose the light version, but that’s just my personal preference - maybe because of the specifics of my vision.
In mobile mode, highlighting those text it becomes black with blue green background, havent tried in desktop yet. It's still dark imo. AFAIK, other platforms with dark mode theme won't use darker text color with dark bg because it will be difficult to read. Check mempool.space theme for reference.
5. Post 66634171 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 19:33:08 CEST 2026) in Tomboi.io - no KYC / no AML exchange, XMR + Tor support - need honest feedback:
For example, what did Binance mean before it became a crypto exchange.
Finance with the B from Bitcoin, I assume.
Yes, I'm quite old, but I remember when g00gle appeared, the name didn't seem like it would lead to this kind of global dominance.
Google comes from googol, which means 10
100.
6. Post 66634111 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 19:15:25 CEST 2026) in Duckdice.io Scamming Everyone's using the Shady Bonuses:
Did you really raise a flag here because the casino doesn't allow you to withdraw coins from the faucet?
Even if it is not written in the ToS, the casino gives you the free coins you get to try their platform and not to take that money to another casino or even to pay your internet bills.
Play a game at that casino, make $500 from there, and you will certainly be able to withdraw it.
Uhh...
Bobstone brushed another reason [that is actually more crucial and should be the vocal point of his explanation on this thread], but for a reason or two that I believe was taken after a thorough discussion with DuckDice team, the reason was omitted.
I can not support the flag as I get the gist of the real issue. But I can't oppose it as well, since Bobstone's statement wasn't backed up by real evidence.
But... yeah...
Bobstone, if I may repeat what I said to you in private: that point should be the first thing you said here and included in your explanation.
Just in case you want to change your mind.
7. Post 66633938 (unedited backup) (by Numeral) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 18:20:31 CEST 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Let's go back to on topic.
Is it just me that it's a bit difficult to read these gray letters on a black background? Especially this info on the left and right blocks on the home page
Ok, I know that these are some informative things, so maybe they are a little hidden because they are not of crucial importance for the operation of the service. I'm kind of used to noticing/reading, and it's a bit hard for me, especially in daylight.
[...]
I also find it a bit hard to read text in this color; I even go out of my way to highlight it with my mouse so the font turns white on a blue background - that makes it easier on the eyes. It’s clear that the website’s design concept is centered around the name, which is why dark tones dominate. But it’s now become popular on many platforms to offer both dark and light versions of a site, depending on the user’s preference. I usually choose the light version, but that’s just my personal preference - maybe because of the specifics of my vision.
8. Post 66633157 (unedited backup) (by prodigal son) (scraped on Sun Apr 19 13:38:13 CEST 2026) in -- Vlad2Vlad's Ban Appeal :
yes, that's my account. there's only Vlad2Vlad in crypto and only one such account. I changed the password a bunch of times cause i kept forgetting it since i wasn't using it very often.
You can prove that you are the owner of the account by signing the address 1FL8V65zjeNbwV2tFM363d11YM9iL8x8QJ
from here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4236484.msg38524360#msg38524360But that is only until May 25, 2018, which does not confirm ownership for an earlier period.
This:
In the span of ~20 minutes i had hundreds of posts deleted, all
my ~7 accounts on bitcointalk banned permanently, and i was also banned for life from twitter and youtube. I used to be a bad rule breaking type of person.
excludes any possibility of unbanning 'your' account. You don't deserve to be here, even if Trump personally came to advocate for you.
You can lock this topic or wait for this account to also be banned.
I'm above president Trump's pay-grade. Another 5 posts deleted. gee, i wonder why?
9. Post 66631862 (unedited backup) (by irfan_pak10) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 23:50:25 CEST 2026) in [OPEN] Tomboi.io No KYC Crypto Exchange | Review Campaign | $100 Reward:
...
What is the payment rate here?
$100 for the most insightful, comprehensive review, or is the number of slots limited?
It's a bit unclear, it sounds like only one review will be rewarded with $100, while the others will participate, but there is no guarantee what the prize will be.
It means they have limited no. of slots, and each slot can get uptown 100$ worth of rewards based on the review. This is what I think from the OP
10. Post 66631105 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 20:10:07 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
So, here are your predictions for round 15 :| Name | Prediction |
| xLays | 75 067,00 |
| Pmalek | 75 214,00 |
| Hypnotizer | 75 398,56 |
| Leahized | 75 421,00 |
| ESG | 75 678,34 |
| LoyceV | 75 898,57 |
| examplens | 76 016,00 |
| cryptofrka | 100 000,00 |
And the user protected by LoyceV is... cryptofrka. You will see for yourself how LoyceV picked his name once the PM is visible. What a shame about this "protector"....
And I wanted to talk to you about round 16 to let you know not to wait too long after the round 15 results, or maybe not, because timing could be important.
11. Post 66629636 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Apr 18 11:26:19 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (57) 14369 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 203:
HostFat (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 308 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (14) 9540 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 30747:
Vod (
Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2619 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4913 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2768 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 10725 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4595 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 2745 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 3409 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2623 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 9550 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 8618 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 113670:
Mitchell (
Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1965 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 1952 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 6192 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2470 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2105 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 480 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (11) 6536 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 1879 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 189967:
buckrogers (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2319 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 206143:
Lesbian Cow (
Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 757 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2905 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 6136 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 6676 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 6718 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (26) 3574 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (32) 9768 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 715 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 4294 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3657 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 11700 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2664 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 4436 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (61) 20586 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 6318 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3031 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 9559 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 1364 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 4001 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 450 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1690 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1488 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3705 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1149 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3444 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6645 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 4162 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 1942 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2238 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 4449 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 15339 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2218 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3303 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +83 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (36) 12162 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1179651:
sheenshane (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1172 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1383 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2258 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2043 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 9636 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2523 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3418 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 7381 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11289 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1634314:
shahzadafzal (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 3198 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1668017:
anonymousminer (
Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1417 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4013 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3370 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 20260 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2641 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 2474 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 2538 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 5553 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 5641 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1546 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3508 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 1890 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1283 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 3957 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 829 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1143 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5515 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (25) 7888 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1862 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 9611 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1552 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 9665 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6296 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1242 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3346 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3486361:
PowerGlove (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 7006 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (
8488 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
884 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
44 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
192 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3318:
Luke-Jr (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
201 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. Post 66626045 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Fri Apr 17 12:05:13 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
I honestly don't care what stupid metamask wallet is doing, but it might be a good idea to ask them for removal.
There is no way anyone is going to be protected from phishing just because of metamask, and it's silly to have it enabled all the time because they have a bunch of false positives.
The idea was excellent as a prevention against phishing, but it came down to the fact that most often, the competition makes such reports. Almost every smaller exchanger or mixer goes through this.
A few months ago there was a false report of a mixer with strong altcoinstalks presence.
I opened an issue in github and was able to remove the "false positive " in metamask
A few weeks later, that same mixer made an exit scam.
I do t know if metamask was "lucky " but reporting it correctly or if they have some good algorithm that catch a high probability of scam
13. Post 66624685 (unedited backup) (by Potato Chips) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 23:38:43 CEST 2026) in Tomboi.io - no KYC / no AML exchange, XMR + Tor support - need honest feedback:
As for the escrow deposit, I don't know what prompted you to add another $5k, but maybe they rushed you with it. As far as I can see, the current reserves are $22k, so practically over 50% is in your escrow reserves. I think that it would be better if you have larger reserves at this moment, because practically the swap of any coin (except XMR) cannot exceed the escrow reserves. This is good for users, but it limits your offer quite a bit.
It limits you and limits potential growth. Add to that the problem of 3/4 of your reserves being in one currency (XMR).
He edited his post but right from the start, $10K in escrow was the plan. However, he wasn't sure whether to distribute that to 5 people or just one. It appears, he just went with the latter and added the rest to Little Mouse.
I agree with the reserves. It should be their priority at this point.
Honestly, both KycNotList and AntiKYC are still quite minor, so the decision to deposit with them in escrow is a bit surprising.
OrangeFren.com would have been a better candidate. Been running for years, and has a solid reputation. Though they could be cautious on listing newly launched exchanges.
Here is their ANN thread if OP is interested:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409616.0
14. Post 66624556 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 23:10:43 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.
I am using Firefox and I am getting the same message so I guess its not only restricted to Chrome and Opera.
15. Post 66624550 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 23:09:25 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
@splashed, you need an urgent reaction.
Someone reported the Metamask splash.tf domain as harmful. It is necessary to request a delisting from the blocklist
It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.
[img height=304]https://talkimg.com/images/2026/04/16/UfIIBv.png[/img]
I think it would be better for splashed to be more active on the forum, even though this ANN has been inactive for about ~1 Month without activity, things like this can happen and and also to let forum users know that everything is fine.
Since they don't have a CM representative, I think it would be better if they logged into BTT every 5 days. They haven't accessed the forum since April 5th.
16. Post 66624087 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 21:01:01 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
@splashed, you need an urgent reaction.
Someone reported the Metamask splash.tf domain as harmful. It is necessary to request a delisting from the blocklist
It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.
I honestly don't care what stupid metamask wallet is doing, but it might be a good idea to ask for removal.
There is no way anyone is going to be protected from phishing just because of metamask, and it's silly to have it enabled all the time because they have a bunch of false positives.
17. Post 66623811 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 19:50:37 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
@splashed, you need an urgent reaction.
Someone reported the Metamask splash.tf domain as harmful. It is necessary to request a delisting from the blocklist
It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.
Perhaps it would be best to remove MetaMask.
removing from that list is slow and the accuracy of MetaMask blocklist has become poor.
It is possible to open an issue on github about it
https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issuesIt is common to see people requesting unblocking websites.
18. Post 66623787 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 19:45:13 CEST 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
@splashed, you need an urgent reaction.
Someone reported the Metamask splash.tf domain as harmful. It is necessary to request a delisting from the blocklist
It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.
Perhaps it would be best to remove MetaMask.
removing from that list is slow and the accuracy of MetaMask blocklist has become poor.
19. Post 66623554 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 18:45:26 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Uzmimo primer ove review kampanje. Nisam siguran sta je target ovde i kako ce se evaluirati rezultat kampanje
Nagrade
- Predlozi: ($0.00, ali kvalitetni predlozi mogu biti nagradjeni)
- Manji problemi: $0.50 - $1.00 po prijavi
- Veci problemi: $5.00 - $10.00 po prijavi
- Totalni bugovi: $20.00 - $50.00 po prijavi
Dva poluaktivna ucesnika, uzece po $2-$3. Niti ce vlasnik dobiti realan review, niti ce ucesnici biti zadovoljni nagradom za trud. Posle ce da dodju do zakljucka kako Bitcointalk vise nije vredan ulaganja, protracili su vreme i 'novac'.
O onoj kampanji gde je potrebno rezervisati hotel i avion, sve to koristiti pa napisati recenziju i u konkurenciji si da dobijes par desetina usd kao nagradu, ne treba trositi reci.
Ovo sam vidio, pa ko normalan postavi takva plaćanja po kampanji. Šta da nekome prijavljujem tipfelere za 50 centi? Pa radije bi ga poslao negdje nego čitao njegovu stranicu i tražio ih za tu lovu. Da ne spominjem da valjda svaki program u kojeg danas ubaciš tekst ima i nekakav autocorrect. A čak i ako nema, chat gpt to riješi s jednim copy paste. Uopće ne znam kako nastane takva kampanja i kako netko misli da nešto dobiva od toga.
Pa dovraga, za ovaj post ću dobit 5$ a nisam morao gledati stranicu projekta koji me uopće ne interesira.
Šta se tiče biranja managera, po meni manageri s lošim trustom mogu jedino do posla ako oni kontaktiraju projekt i prodaju im priču. Ako netko šalje PM više managera ipak je napravio minimalni reserch pa vjerojatno i vidi razliku. Ili će barem poslušati savjet nekog drugog.
20. Post 66622662 (unedited backup) (by iqbal26) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 13:47:49 CEST 2026) in Escrow0 — Secure Escrow Service :
There is no anonymity involved here. Escrow0 operates under PT Digital Smart Service, which is a legally registered company in Indonesia with an official Business Identification Number / NIB.
How exactly is someone from the EU, from Poland, for example, protected? All trade and agreements are conducted via Telegram, right?
Do you issue any contracts or anything legally binding?
btw. Can you share legal documents and links where we can check your claim?
Most of our community is from Asia and Indonesia. Even though many of you are anonymous since we're building on Telegram, we still track transaction amounts and fees to make sure we're all set for tax requirements.
I have sent the DM, but I censored the email and tax ID
21. Post 66622530 (unedited backup) (by iqbal26) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 12:58:25 CEST 2026) in Escrow0 — Secure Escrow Service :
The irony in everything is that, considering that you are anonymous, without a built-up trust, you would have to deposit some money in the 'fourth' party escrow. Why would anyone trust you more than someone from a direct deal?
The fact that you have two negative feedback related to cheating further complicates the matter. So, you have a tendency to do that. How do you expect someone to entrust you with money for safekeeping.
There is no anonymity involved here. Escrow0 operates under PT Digital Smart Service, which is a legally registered company in Indonesia with an official Business Identification Number / NIB.
22. Post 66622091 (unedited backup) (by BlackBoss_) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 09:48:37 CEST 2026) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Is anyone here? I want to know how long it usually takes to withdraw funds. I've been using this website for a long time, about a year, but I've never withdrawn any funds before. Today I deposited some money and won some in Baccarat. I tried to withdraw, but several hours have passed and my withdrawal order hasn't arrived. What happened? How long does it usually take to withdraw funds?
Answers from posts in the past.
And yes, after the withdrawal request, I recognized the pending income transaction in my wallet almost immediately. I don't remember seeing such a fast withdrawal at any casino.
I agree, my Withdrawal was very fast too.
I had problems at first , but once it worked my withdrawal was completed in very few seconds.
But I think they should improve their error messages, because just a 406 error means nothing to me..
If your withdrawal request has issues, you can contact their support for help.
23. Post 66621864 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Thu Apr 16 07:52:44 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Round 14 is now over, here are the results :Closing price on 15/04/2026 :
74 834$| Name | Prediction | Difference |
| xLays | 75 067,00 | 233,00 |
| ESG | 72 088,08 | 2 745,92 |
| cryptofrka | 72 000,00 | 2 834,00 |
| LoyceV | 71 641,62 | 3 192,38 |
| Pmalek | 71 248,00 | 3 586,00 |
| Hypnotizer | 71 199,50 | 3 634,50 |
| Leahized | 70 998,00 | 3 836,00 |
| Doan9269 | 70 550,00 | 4 284,00 |
| promise444c5 | 70 325,00 | 4 509,00 |
Sorry, xLays, you sold your soul by joining this game, you can't just leave it that easily. To help you get back into the game, here's 50BTC for taking the first place.
I thought this round was going to be brutal, but not this bad.
Examplens, by not participating in this round, you lose a life.
Sorry, promise444c5 and Doan9269, this round is fatal for you. You have lost your last lives, so you are out of the game. It’s not your fault, blame LoyceV for failing to protect you.
For round 15, it's the same old story. Try to survive.
Round 15 : The Bloody round strikes back
What will be the price of Bitcoin at
April 21, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 20/04/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before
April 18, 2026, 06:00:00 PM.
Cash shop:
OPEN Special rules :The two players with the worst predictions will lose a life.
LoyceV has to protect someone.
24. Post 66619429 (unedited backup) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on Wed Apr 15 14:01:43 CEST 2026) in Adbitco account alternative to SmartGold01?:
Sorry to interrupt, just thought I'd try clarify the following off topic misinformation. I forgot how people write shit here without a source and hope others will believe it
There’s a case about user Wiwo cheating on altcoinstalk but ignored since fellow local member defending the user.
Nope, it wasn't ignored there were 2 Judges and myself who reviewed the case and it was closed due to lack of evidence, hoods were peaked under etc.
They were defended by LuckyDigger and examplens over there, neither of which are active in Nigerian section.
Can you add a link to this topic?
Since no-one appeared to be able to find it
this is the original topic over there that was quoted over here.
As Karl_3000 said, no user was red tagged regarding this.
Lmao, You’re exactly one of them. Are you kidding me.
I guess I must be part of the grand conspiracy as well.
25. Post 66619396 (unedited backup) (by tomboi) (scraped on Wed Apr 15 13:47:07 CEST 2026) in Tomboi.io - no KYC / no AML exchange, XMR + Tor support - need honest feedback:
Was this account purchased?
You haven't been active since 2019, so can you sign a message from this address?
Thank you for raising the concern.
I understand why this question may come up, and I respect the caution of forum members when reviewing a new service thread. That said, I would prefer not to turn this topic into a discussion of private or historical account matters.
I believe it is more useful and fair for the thread to stay focused on the service itself, how we operate, and what public guarantees we are prepared to provide.
I think what hugeblack asked is completely understandable and not a deviation from the topic. An honest answer to this is part of the discussion process about your "service itself, how we operate,". Only a direct and honest answer can close the discussion on this.
Now you are focused on building trust, and in the near future, the previous owner of the account may show up, or someone may accuse you of anything related to your account in the past.
All your efforts may become worthless because you have not cleared up the unclear history today.
I understand the concern, and I’ll clarify this directly.
Yes, I am the current owner of this account.
The reason I chose to use an existing account was mainly practical — to be able to properly present the service (including signature and formatting), since new accounts have strict limitations in that regard.
At the same time, I fully understand that account history alone should not be used as a basis for trust, especially in the context of a service like this.
That’s exactly why I am not relying on the account itself for credibility and instead focusing on verifiable guarantees:
– $10,000 escrow has been publicly deposited and confirmed
– the service is actively maintained and improved
– we are working on increasing transparency (guarantee letter, clearer terms, etc.)
I agree that trust should come from actions, not from account age or rank, and I’m prepared to build that trust over time through consistent operation.
I’m open to any service-related questions.
26. Post 66618951 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Wed Apr 15 10:33:44 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Ali nije nikom obećana ta maksimalna isplata. Napisano je da svaki učesnik, Sr. Member i viši rangovi, mogu zaraditi od $1.2 do $5 po postu. A zatim piše da će svaki primljeni učesnik dobiti PM sa predloženom isplatom po napisanom postu. Vjerovatno se tih $5 po postu čuva za sami creme de la creme ovog forumu po menadžerovom mišljenju. Vrlo spretno se igra sa riječima ali se ne može reči da je promijenio pravila. I ja sam bio primljen u kampanju sa prijedlogom isplate $4 po postu do 25 postova tjedno ali sam dan prije toga primljen u Earnbet i zato sam odbio.
Ma to da isplata $5 po postu nije nikome obećana je totalna glupost po meni. Tako je isto mogao napisati da je isplata $10 po postu ali da on odlučuje o tome tko će dobiti tu isplatu. Naravno, ne radi se o promjeni pravila nego o tome da velikim iznosima privlači korisnike da se prijave kako bi mogao napisati da za svaku kampanju ima na stotine prijavljenih.
/snip
Pre 6-7 godina bi tu sevali red tagovi.
Pa upravo to mi je bilo čudno. Nitko nije niti riječi na forumu napisao o tome da je broj postova u tom jednom tjednu bio smanjen. OK, moguće stvarno da se potkrala greška ali ne mogu vjerovati da nitko nije reagirao.
Čini mi se da bi bilo poštenije da je jednostavno napisao da se po postu plaća toliko i toliko a da će on, po osobnoj prosudbi kvalitete postova svih sudionika kampanje, svakog tjedna odabrati 1 sudionika kampanje i nagraditi ga posebnom novčanim bonusom.
Ovako to izgleda kao neka muljaža da izgleda da je kampanja bolje plaćena nego što zapravo je.
A zašto se nitko ne buni? Pa s obzirom da je broj kampanja ograničen očito se nitko ne želi zamjerati i većina je sretna da dobije to što dobije.
27. Post 66618837 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Wed Apr 15 09:55:19 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Ali nije nikom obećana ta maksimalna isplata. Napisano je da svaki učesnik, Sr. Member i viši rangovi, mogu zaraditi od $1.2 do $5 po postu. A zatim piše da će svaki primljeni učesnik dobiti PM sa predloženom isplatom po napisanom postu. Vjerovatno se tih $5 po postu čuva za sami creme de la creme ovog forumu po menadžerovom mišljenju. Vrlo spretno se igra sa riječima ali se ne može reči da je promijenio pravila. I ja sam bio primljen u kampanju sa prijedlogom isplate $4 po postu do 25 postova tjedno ali sam dan prije toga primljen u Earnbet i zato sam odbio.
Ma to da isplata $5 po postu nije nikome obećana je totalna glupost po meni. Tako je isto mogao napisati da je isplata $10 po postu ali da on odlučuje o tome tko će dobiti tu isplatu. Naravno, ne radi se o promjeni pravila nego o tome da velikim iznosima privlači korisnike da se prijave kako bi mogao napisati da za svaku kampanju ima na stotine prijavljenih.
/snip
Pre 6-7 godina bi tu sevali red tagovi.
Pa upravo to mi je bilo čudno. Nitko nije niti riječi na forumu napisao o tome da je broj postova u tom jednom tjednu bio smanjen. OK, moguće stvarno da se potkrala greška ali ne mogu vjerovati da nitko nije reagirao.
28. Post 66616900 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Tue Apr 14 19:05:37 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Lijepo da je ispravio grešku. Moguće da mu je netko u Telegram grupi spomenuo da je krivo izbrojao postove.
Ali opet ostaje činjenica da nitko ne prima maksimalnu isplatu koja je obećana u prvom postu signature kampanje. To je isto u redu ako je pravilo za maksimalnu isplatu transparentno napisano među pravilima kampanje, a znamo da nije.
Komunicirali smo prije ispravka. Tako da na žalost šta se mene tiče to je priseljeni ispravak, kada te netko ulovi u mutnum. A mislim i ja vodim kampanju pa neću nakon 50+ tjedana odjednom platiti 20% manje. Greške se događaju ali takve mi je malo nevjerojatno. Kopiraš tablicu od prijašnjeg tjedna svaki put, tamo ti je zalokano 25 postova i moraš fizički promjeniti na 20.
29. Post 66615950 (unedited backup) (by SmartGold01) (scraped on Tue Apr 14 14:49:02 CEST 2026) in Adbitco account alternative to SmartGold01?:
At first I want to formally apologize to those whom I have gave neutral feedback, which is lovesmayfamilies and FinneysTrueVision, I acted this due to how I was emotionally unstable and drained. It is shocking to see that such a thing just came up and I was also surprised they way everything where happening, after some thought I noticed that I was too biased on my judgement by misusing the trust system which I shouldn't. Although, there is no one which this would happened to they would be happy for the allegation which knowing too well that I have never involved in merit abuse.
It was heart broken, in fact it was @examplens comment which gave me the courage to come out to speak as being silent could be that bad. I am a merit source and I distribute merit accordingly and to how I found any profile worthy of meriting. I could remembered a topic like that, where people talks about how merit should be distributed. Many people said lot of things about what actually attracted them to distribute merit which everyone has their own ways of reviewing and analyzing profiles. However, I am saying that I do not abuse merits and even theymos already explained everything in pm on the day he made me source, hence I can't compromise with his words and I sticked to his directives how it should be..
Therefore, apologize to everyone here, that if I have misused or abused the trust system, I deem it necessary to say that I am very sorry for the way I have used the trust system and feedback. Hence, I have reversed my feedback from both two, which is FinneysTrueVision and lovesmayfamilies.
To Everyone who has showed interest on this case, I also in one way apologize to you all including yahoo62278, and hugeblack for the misused of the Trust system.
Thank you
30. Post 66615531 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Tue Apr 14 12:17:49 CEST 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Lijepo da je ispravio grešku. Moguće da mu je netko u Telegram grupi spomenuo da je krivo izbrojao postove.
Ali opet ostaje činjenica da nitko ne prima maksimalnu isplatu koja je obećana u prvom postu signature kampanje. To je isto u redu ako je pravilo za maksimalnu isplatu transparentno napisano među pravilima kampanje, a znamo da nije.
31. Post 66613555 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Mon Apr 13 20:12:50 CEST 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Here are your predictions for Round 14 :| Name | Prediction |
| promise444c5 | 70 325,00 |
| Doan9269 | 70 550,00 |
| Leahized | 70 998,00 |
| Hypnotizer | 71 199,50 |
| Pmalek | 71 248,00 |
| LoyceV | 71 641,62 |
| cryptofrka | 72 000,00 |
| ESG | 72 088,08 |
| xLays | 75 067,00 |
| examplens | DNP |
And the user protected by LoyceV is... oh, that's so cute... you helped me, so I'm protecting you... So the lucky one is Hypnotizer.