Last update: 2026-03-10_Tue_14.18h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66493847 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 14:13:13 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:
Received
btw. Trezor wallet marks tokens as poisoned, this is not just the case with ZEN, I have seen this with most tokens in the Trezor suite. I have not researched how to remove this and make the token regularly visible by default
I looked into this, and it seems Trezor applies this warning to all newer or less mainstream tokens by default. Hopefully, this will change in the future as we continue to grow.
So, I don't need additional ETH to cover the gas fee during the transaction of USDT, and ZEN for stake?
Nope, once you create a wallet with them, you will see $5 in your Gas balance that you can use to pay off gas fees. It's actually a great incentive for getting people to create a wallet as no matter how small the gas fees are, people would prefer to avoid them if possible
Actually, that’s correct. We
fully sponsor primary actions on the Zenland protocol, such as agent registration and escrow creation.
These sponsored transactions utilize Zenland’s own gas wallets within the NYKNYC ecosystem, so they don’t touch your personal gas wallet at all.
Another great benefit of ERC-4337 Account Abstraction is that your $5 gas balance can be used across all EVM-compatible chains within the NYKNYC ecosystem.
The
$5 in your Gas wallet is provided to cover
any other secondary transactions you might perform.
Here is a screenshot showing how these sponsored transactions are marked:

Thank you mate, I confirm that I received my ZEN tokens. I will register within the next couple of days as I am getting USDC sent to my MetaMask wallet real soon
Thank you for giving Zenland a shot, Baseplate! We really appreciate the support.
2. Post 66493772 (unedited backup) (by Baseplate) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 13:50:37 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:
So, I don't need additional ETH to cover the gas fee during the transaction of USDT, and ZEN for stake?
No, once you create a wallet with them, you will see $5 in your Gas balance that you can use to pay off gas fees. It's actually a great incentive for getting people to create a wallet as no matter how small the gas fees are, people would prefer to avoid them if possible
3. Post 66493643 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 13:04:55 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:
OK, I just tried to re-register as an agent, but it is not possible to complete the application without the ZEN token.
So, I need some for that. Here is my ETH address, which I will use for this purpose: 0xDa41a544b43583cB408d5AB53145485D954fa5C5
thanks
btw: Is it possible to change the account information later? I have some ideas for a different contact, it would be ideal if I could update later. Also, it is not possible to enter a link to the Bitcointak profile, due to the limitation of 50 characters
Absolutely, you are free to update your account information at any time. To work around the 50-character limit for now, please add your profile as a custom contact:
Name: Bitcointalk
Value: examplens
We are planning a UI update soon that will explicitly identify forum contacts to make this more intuitive for everyone.
I’ve just sent the ZEN tokens to your address. Please give the registration another look and let us know if you encounter any friction, bugs, or "ugly" UX - we’re eager to keep refining the experience!
PM Sent
Thanks for giving NYKNYC a try! I have sent the ZEN tokens to your wallet.
One of the major benefits of using the
NYKNYC wallet is that Zenland
covers your gas fees. This means that both your agent registration and the creation of escrow contracts are entirely free. This is made possible through ERC-4337 Account Abstraction technology, which allows for sponsored transactions.
Please let us know if the registration process went smoothly for you!
4. Post 66493508 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 12:21:49 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:
I am interested, do you stake the ZEN in your wallet or do you have to go through your website?
Staking is quite straightforward. You just need to complete the registration form here:
https://zen.land/agents/register. Since ZEN tokens are not currently available for sale, please leave your wallet address in this thread or send me a PM. I will happily send you 100 ZEN tokens so you can begin staking immediately.
Hello Zenland
I've learned about your concept and I'm interested in joining your community to operate as an agent. Should we keep discussions in this thread?
You are welcome to DM us directly or continue the discussion here - whatever is most convenient for you! The registration process is very simple: just share your ETH wallet address in this thread, and we will send you the minimum ZEN tokens required to begin staking as an agent.
I was just wondering recently why you're no longer on the Bitcointalk forum.
What are the most important changes on the platform compared to the previous version? I see that only the Ethereum network and USDT/USDC tokens are currently active. Why such a change?
The protocol is now fully decentralized, meaning it is no longer under our direct control. We spent monthes studying the governance models of DAOs like Aave and Uniswap to ensure we could implement a similar structure, where smart contracts are governed exclusively by the DAO.
The biggest change is architectural: while Zenland V1 relied on a backend, Zenland V2 is backendless. This allows anyone to build their own custom interfaces for the Zenland protocol. Additionally, we no longer manually appoint agents; the process is permissionless and open to everyone. We have also introduced a treasury where all protocol fees are now automatically directed. You can track our governance and treasury activity here:
https://openbook.to/dao/zenlandI have not seen anywhere that it is possible to trade with the ZEN token. Where is it even possible to buy/sell your token, and what is its value?
I admit, it confuses me a bit since there is already a ZEN (Horizen) coin, you probably should have created a more unique ticker
ZEN tokens are not currently available for public sale. For our initial private sale, we are planning a price of $0.01 per token (meaning the 2,000-token requirement is currently valued at $20), though the price will likely shift for the IEO.
Regarding the ticker: we did discuss the overlap with Horizen (ZEN) internally. Ultimately, we decided to stick with it, as we operate in entirely different niches and believe the context of our protocol keeps the two distinct.
On a personal note, we want to thank you for all the times you advising users to use our service, Examplens. We would be honored to have you join our DAO and help shape the future growth of Zenland through your participation and voting.
5. Post 66493312 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 10:55:25 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
However, honestly I don't know that whether it can help them in legal aspect in the future as I am vague that whether the governments can accept a platform with two parts: one part complies well with AML, another part does not comply with AML. Just my thinking but perhaps they already thought about it thoroughly.
There will never be any problems with this, everything is taken care of.
Ok thanks for that. It's very important for your users that you have a "no kyc" policy and that they are sure that, from the legal side, their funds will not be blocked.
Until now, unfortunately, there have been many different cases and, as time goes on and crypto regulation in the world becomes more and more strict, it is more difficult to find crypto services that do not require kyc and provide anonymity to users.
You have our support for your work and service.
6. Post 66492990 (unedited backup) (by Zenland) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 09:11:08 CET 2026) in [ESCROW] Zenland V2: DAO-Governed Smart Contract Escrow | 1% Fee, $50 Max:
Hello BitcoinTalk,
It's good to be back. We’ve rebuilt Zenland from the ground up, and Zenland is now a fully decentralized protocol governed by a DAO.
First thing we’d like to do is invite our original agents to join **Zenland V2**. If you were an agent before, please post your **ETH wallet** here and I’ll send you **2000 ZEN tokens** as a small thank-you for your long-time support.
@yahoo62278 @AB de Royse777 @examplens @NotATether @paid2 @GxSTxV
To operate as an agent in V2 you’ll need to stake **at least 100 ZEN** plus any amount of stablecoins. For example, staking **$10 in USDC/USDT** allows you to be assigned to contracts up to **20× that amount**.
This forum played a big role in getting Zenland to where it is today, so thank you for the support.
7. Post 66492418 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Tue Mar 10 02:01:56 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Round 7 is now over, here are the results :Closing price on 09/03/2026 :
68 459$| Name | Prediction 1 | Prediction 2 | Selected prediction | B/M | Final prediction | Difference |
| Leahized | 67 573,00 | 68 358,00 | 68 358,00 | | 68 358,00 | 101,00 |
| ESG | 67 480,00 | 68 888,88 | 68 888,88 | | 68 888,88 | 429,88 |
| LoyceV | 67 945,96 | 70 806,73 | 67 945,96 | | 67 945,96 | 513,04 |
| Hypnotizer | 67 866,90 | 69 999,00 | 67 866,90 | | 67 866,90 | 592,10 |
| BABY SHOES | 66 895,00 | 67 777,00 | 67 777,00 | 1% p.malus | 67 099,23 | 1 359,77 |
| Pmalek | 66 415,00 | 67 011,00 | 67 011,00 | | 67 011,00 | 1 448,00 |
| examplens | 70 066,12 | 73 400,37 | 70 066,12 | | 70 066,12 | 1 607,12 |
| promise444c5 | 63 678,00 | 66 606,00 | 66 606,00 | | 66 606,00 | 1 853,00 |
| cryptofrka | 67 300,00 | 71 200,00 | 67 300,00 | 1,25% p.malus | 66 458,75 | 2 000,25 |
| Danydee | 63 237,00 | 65 677,00 | 65 677,00 | | 65 677,00 | 2 782,00 |
| xLays | 71 676,00 | 74 676,00 | 71 676,00 | | 71 676,00 | 3 217,00 |
| Doan9269 | 60 000,00 | 80 000,00 | 60 000,00 | 0,75% p.malus | 59 550,00 | 8 909,00 |
This round is for you, Leahized. Only 25BTC have been added to your account. But now you have the "Hunter's card".
When/if you are eliminated (and not MIA), you can remove one of someone else's life. You must first target someone who has more than one life left. But if everyone has one life left, you can target anyone you want. Who will dare to hurt you with this little card in your hand ?
And sorry Doan9269, you lose a life. Stop the magic, use your brain instead
.
The p.malus for those who survived has been reduced.
And remember, the cash shop will be closed for just under 24 hours for the duration of round 8.
For round 8, I will give another card. A less powerful than the hunter's card, but it is a card that will be appreciated by a few lucky people (50BTC will be distributed to the winner).
Round 8 : The round of the last will
What will be the price of Bitcoin at
March 15, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 14/03/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before
March 12, 2026, 07:00:00 PM.
Cash shop:
OPEN (for less than 24h) Special rules : None
8. Post 66491804 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 22:14:01 CET 2026) in Pregled "Games & Rounds" sekcije:
Bas to se i desilo ako nisi ispratio,ja sam kasno video tvoj post. Covek je od mogucih 30 slotova upisao 29. Znaci ovde ce se pravila menjati i to sam citao neke predloge. Mislim,svaka cast za lika,veoma lagana lova,ali ko bi rekao da ce sve slotove zauzeti . Nije bilo moguce da ne uzme nagradu

9. Post 66490250 (unedited backup) (by AakZaki) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 15:48:01 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
I saw in the b1ack signature campaign there were about 45+ participants, but I only saw a few of them using your b1ack swap service, I saw it in the competition participant data here
b1eXch's Bitcointalk Swap Frenzy ⚡♻️ Trade Hard, Rank Higher! ♻️⚡The following are the names of Signature Campaign Participants who are actively swapping on b1ack:
TryNinja
crwth
joker_josue
xandry
5tift
TokenTikas
NeuroticFish
icopress
Here are the names of the participants of the b1ack signature campaign who are not visible using the b1ack service, bro @icopress why don't you encourage these participants to also participate in the competition, so that they can be seen that they are also using b1ack services. If the participants below do it, won't b1ack services be used more?
TypoTonic
Big Dirams
joniboinii
Ultegra134
Awaklara
dansus021
Alex077
Smartvirus
Coyster
FP91G
ZAINmalik75
dwyan36
Zaguru12
summonerrk
safar1980
international
Numeral
tvplus006
MaxMueller
Buchi-88
SamReomo
sheenshane
PX-Z
rat03gopoh
notocactus
NotATether
The Cryptovator
DireWolfM14
inspace
PrivacyG
DaveF
Lakai01
Husna QA
examplens
BlackHatCoiner
mikeywith
mole0815
Mr. Nobody
10. Post 66489782 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 13:47:31 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
However, honestly I don't know that whether it can help them in legal aspect in the future as I am vague that whether the governments can accept a platform with two parts: one part complies well with AML, another part does not comply with AML. Just my thinking but perhaps they already thought about it thoroughly.
There will never be any problems with this, everything is taken care of.
11. Post 66488552 (unedited backup) (by splashed) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 03:49:01 CET 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
What happened with the liquidity funds on splash.tf, somehow I am convinced that earlier there was significantly more here compared to what is currently shown on the site?
Is this a preventive measure or something else?
We have not removed a single satoshi from the liquidity, it's only been increasing from the fees

12. Post 66488496 (unedited backup) (by OcTradism) (scraped on Mon Mar 9 02:53:02 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
But it's not what the company thought about or they thought about risk by separating their products to two types: "clean" coins (low AML score), and "likely stolen coins" (high AML score).
With this product separations for two different types of input coins from users, I believe that they want to minimize risk in the future as well as make it more easily for blockchain accounting with different pools for different customers' coin types.
However, honestly I don't know that whether it can help them in legal aspect in the future as I am vague that whether the governments can accept a platform with two parts: one part complies well with AML, another part does not comply with AML. Just my thinking but perhaps they already thought about it thoroughly.
13. Post 66488135 (unedited backup) (by PX-Z) (scraped on Sun Mar 8 23:39:49 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
When I just opened Clearweb
https://blexch.to/, an Error code 520 message appeared (I didn’t have time to screenshot it). However, when I tried again, it seemed to be back to normal. I’m not sure whether an error like this has happened before or not.
The other Clearweb link,
https://b1exch.to/, it runs normally.
I am running a Browser with out Java Script and the blexch.to page loads to a 'Please enable Java Script to continue'. It repeats continuously even when I use separate identities or when I renew the Tor circuit. On the other hand, b1exch.to works fine.
Idk about on TOR but the site looks good and accessible on clearnet without javascript though. I just tried it.
SOL was only recently added to b1exch, we can consider that it is still in the implementation phase.
Ah, yeah, that explains a lot. I though it was there for several days/weeks already. Thanks for the clarification.
14. Post 66484806 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 23:47:07 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Lock (you see nothing) & unlock
Here are your predictions for round 7 :| Name | Prediction 1 | Prediction 2 | B/M |
| BABY SHOES | 66 895,00 | 67 777,00 | 1.00% p.malus |
| cryptofrka | 67 300,00 | 71 200,00 | 1.25% p.malus |
| Danydee | 63 237,00 | 65 677,00 | |
| Doan9269 | 60 000,00 | 80 000,00 | 0.75% p.malus |
| ESG | 67 480,00 | 68 888,88 | |
| examplens | 70 066,12 | 73 400,37 | |
| GazetaBitcoin | DNP | DNP | |
| Hypnotizer | 67 866,90 | 69 999,00 | |
| Leahized | 67 573,00 | 68 358,00 | |
| LogitechMouse | DNP | DNP | |
| LoyceV | 67 945,96 | 70 806,73 | |
| Pmalek | 66 415,00 | 67 011,00 | |
| promise444c5 | 63 678,00 | 66 606,00 | |
| xLays | 71 676,00 | 74 676,00 | |
Did not participate : GazetaBitcoin and LogitechMouse => -1 life
15. Post 66484039 (unedited backup) (by UmerIdrees) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 20:16:49 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
I agree... the same also happened to Chipmixer. Processing any coins may lead to big trouble to the service.
When an exchange refunding high AML coins it is taking no sides in the matter. And it is the best approach for high AML coins.
Freezing coins is always wrong in my opinion. If the exchange doesn't want the coins, or cant process them, just refund them. Taking coins hostage and demanding documents is wrong, nobody has an obligation to handle personal information to anyone.
Also, once the exchange returns those coins that they aren't using, it shows the trustworthiness of the exchange and the service. Refunding the money is the best option as it not only safeguards the interest of the site but also the person who sends the high AML coins gets back his money and doesn't feel that he has been scammed by the site for not refunding him.
These precautions need to be taken by SageSwap if they are to run their service for the long term.

16. Post 66483640 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 18:29:49 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
Freezing coins is always wrong in my opinion. If the exchange doesn't want the coins, or cant process them, just refund them. Taking coins hostage and demanding documents is wrong, nobody has an obligation to handle personal information to anyone.
Legally registered entities, such as fixedfloat, are sometimes unable to offer refunds to users because they have received an official letter from LE stating that a particular address must be frozen/blocked. If they process the transaction or make a refund, they will face legal problems, which is why they often do not do so.
17. Post 66482748 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 13:22:19 CET 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (59) 14252 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (21) 9405 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 4764 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 51173:
mprep (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 1730 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 2675 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 10526 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4563 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3379 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 9355 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6152 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 8513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 1814 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 6155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2444 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2027 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 145841:
Swordsoffreedom (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 199 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 466 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (9) 6480 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (36) 1855 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2847 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 224980:
cryptodevil (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (5) 254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 13028 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6071 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 6613 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 6619 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +8 / =4 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3486 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (29) 9583 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 704 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (26) 4254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3560 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 11264 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11591 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4518 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2589 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 4364 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (66) 20277 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 6285 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2988 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 9284 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 698159:
Jet Cash (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2069 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 1350 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3923 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 448 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1556 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1487 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3639 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1129 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 6616 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 4155 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 1839 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2214 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 15198 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2192 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3233 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (38) 11830 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1179651:
sheenshane (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1359 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2234 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2028 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 9231 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2473 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3315 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 7292 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 11256 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1668017:
anonymousminer (
Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1397 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 3899 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2608 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 19954 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2478 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 2470 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 2502 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (28) 5454 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 5470 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1528 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 1887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1203 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 823 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1108 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5492 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (27) 7762 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1841 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 9545 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5177 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 9407 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6254 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1233 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3245 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 3373825:
paid2 (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 3763 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 3373858:
n0nce (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (8) 6016 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 646 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 3486361:
PowerGlove (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6903 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3540187:
apogio (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2385 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +43 / =0 / -0) (
8392 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
878 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -1) (
191 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 3318:
Luke-Jr (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
196 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: neutral) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. Post 66482362 (unedited backup) (by b1ack) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 10:29:25 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Contact Us:
Get in touch via our official channels.
I sent a private message here on the forum. Is that valid as an official channel? I believe so.

If I'm wrong, let me know.
We are currently have affiliates only via api.
b1exch was under serious DDoS attacks. This was followed by the Njalla domain registrar, which suspended the b1exch.io and blexch.io domains.

In order for the exchange to remain active on clearnet, the b1exch.to (blexch.to also) domain was registered.
I never liked Njalla as a registrar. Yes, there are good folks running it, but they are not actually a top-level registrar since ICANN rejected their application years ago (cause they didn't want to give that power to Peter Sunde of ThePirateBay legacy apparently), so they actually get all their domains from Tucows.
So Tucows can basically force them to suspend domains outright, and they have to comply or they lose their partnership and thus business.
This has lead to Njalla becoming trigger-happy with domain suspensions when someone files an abuse report. IIRC, they also wrongly suspended xcancel.com or some other Nitter primary domain too.
I get the picture now. Anyway in 15 more days , we will be able to transfer the domain and get .io back.
Seems like it's currently impossible to complete a SOL swap.
First try, order #35804471: I sent 1 LTC to become ~0.61 SOL. From that amount, only 16% got swapped (0.10 SOL) and the remaining 83% was refunded as LTC (0.831).
Then I tried again after 1 hour, with a lower amount, order #205B5DBB: I sent 0.45 LTC to become ~0.266 SOL, and the entire order was refunded.
We are working on it.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
19. Post 66482322 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 10:13:37 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
b1exch was under serious DDoS attacks. This was followed by the Njalla domain registrar, which suspended the b1exch.io and blexch.io domains.

In order for the exchange to remain active on clearnet, the b1exch.to (blexch.to also) domain was registered.
I never liked Njalla as a registrar. Yes, there are good folks running it, but because they are not actually a top-level registrar since ICANN rejected their application years ago (cause they didn't want to give that power to Peter Sunde of ThePirateBay legacy apparently), so they actually get all their domains from Tucows.
So Tucows can basically force them to suspend domains outright, and they have to comply or they lose their partnership and thus business.
This has lead to Njalla becoming trigger-happy with odmain suspensions. IIRC, they also wrongly suspended xcancel.com or some other Nitter primary domain too.
20. Post 66481763 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Mar 7 03:58:31 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
In the long term, it is certainly better for the exchange itself, because once they are marked as someone who accepts all coins without exception, after that, they are under constant pressure, most often from the competition.
I agree... the same also happened to Chipmixer.
When an exchange refunding high AML coins it is taking no sides in the matter. Freezing coins is always wrong in my opinion.
If the exchange doesn't want the coins, or cant process them, just refund them. Taking coins hostage and demanding documents is wrong, nobody has an obligation to handle personal information to anyone.
21. Post 66479258 (unedited backup) (by lovesmayfamilis) (scraped on Fri Mar 6 13:57:43 CET 2026) in Questionable posters in signature campaigns :
Did you read what he has posted on this thread?
He has apologized already for the wrongdoing. You can also see that he sent Free Market Capitalist a merit also which show that he know he has done something wrong. Reading what he has posted is very important to get this discussion to the right direction.
What exactly did he do here?
He apologized to silence and forget this attention as soon as possible, so everyone could continue where they left off. He presents spam as something that happened by accident, so I don't understand how it's possible to spam accidentally.
I know a man who caught a woman cheating on him, she also claimed that it happened by accident. She apologized and promised that it would be the last time, it might happen one or two more times, but it would be completely accidental again.
As JollyGood often notes, checking the post history of some users, you can also notice in the case of Joy-maker that this is not his only account on the forum. Having started his "path" on the forum, he clearly understood where and what to write in order to quickly boost his account. Similarly, what can you want from an account that has a goal of dozens of daily posts on topics that are already impossibly "chewed up"? If a person has several accounts, it is very difficult to have time to think about everything, read, and write something new.
His apologies will not affect his personality in any way

. It doesn't cost such accounts anything to apologize a hundred times, bow their heads, call the interlocutor "sir" as a sign of "respect," and continue doing what they did before.
There is a big difference between those for whom the forum is a place for communication, reading, and some profit, and those who have decided to live on the funds received from the signature companies.
22. Post 66478646 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Fri Mar 6 09:41:32 CET 2026) in Questionable posters in signature campaigns :
And I'm somehow convinced that, like you, they don't want additional drama and explaining about shitposting, it becomes boring after all these years.
Yes, pretty boring but what I am seeing lately is what LoyceV highlights here:
What is new, and what worries me is that more and more shitposters now manage to earn enough Merit to move up through the Ranks.
Then, they can join signature campaigns and post without even trying to understand what is actually being discussed.
23. Post 66478616 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Fri Mar 6 09:24:37 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
What we learned from the eXch case, for the health of the exchange itself, might be better to be careful here. I fully support the exchanger's decision to refund the user if the AML score shows that it is about stolen assets, and to refuse to process such swap orders.
Yes, we learned a lot from eXch and thus it's now somehow necessary to stop very high AML coins but SageSwap's official representative said that they don't care about the source of coins and they accept high AML coins. So with AML swap a user has to pay 2.2% more in fees and the exchance doesn't care much about the coins even if they're tagged or dirty.
Here's the statement of the representative:
First and most important: The long awaited AML Swaps are finally here!
This is a new way to exchange your "Dirty", flagged, high risk or just problematic coins without any hassle. No need to contact support anymore - you just go in and swap.
24. Post 66477548 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 22:43:19 CET 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I don't know who uses the TRC20 network at all, it's terribly expensive. I know that there is a thing with Tron Energy, which can reduce the network fee for these transactions, but what is the purpose if I have to buy an additional asset so that the transactions would be approximately as favourable as on other networks.
I wouldn't be surprised if Justin and his friends are pumping up use of stablecoins on tron network

Another thing to check is what chains are earning most fees, that could give us slightly better picture.
I have a feeling one day this big stablecoin bubble is going to explode...to zero.
TRC20 was a lot cheaper to transact USDT when ETH had its DeFi/NFT bull run and every transaction costed $100. That's why it was known as the "cheaper" alternative. Now that no one hardly uses ETH again and there is no competition to see who snipes a monkey jpeg faster, it became cheaper.
It's funny that even some ethereum second layers now have higher fees than ethereum itself

25. Post 66477115 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 20:47:37 CET 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
What happened with the liquidity funds on splash.tf, somehow I am convinced that earlier there was significantly more here compared to what is currently shown on the site?
I compared
September 24, 2025,
January 4, 2026 and
February 17, 2026, and don't really see much of a change. But it's hard to attribute exact values to fluctuating exchange rates.
There has been a drastic decrease in XMR liquidity compared to LoyceV's snapshots, before there were almost 50 XMR, now there's less than a fraction...
BTC, ETH and DAI reserves remain at the average of other days, only XMR has seen a drastic change.
Perhaps to increase liquidity, more people should swap coins with splash or they should contract liquidity funds so that they can hold custody of the assets (I don't know how this works in detail). There must be some solution to the current low liquidity...
26. Post 66476309 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 16:51:13 CET 2026) in Questionable posters in signature campaigns :
As someone who actively uses the forum, such posts may bother you, but keep in mind that the manager controls each post, and if it is accepted in the post count during payment, it means that he recognized them as valuable.
Tbh, I think its more about managers realizing that even if they remove shitposters from their campaigns they will have to replace them with even worse ones, than being satisfied with actual quality. At least I like to think that's why so many below average members are getting paid for their shitposts.
This will continue as long as there are more spots in signature campaigns than there are decent members.
27. Post 66475765 (unedited backup) (by b1ack) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 14:20:37 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
We always complete an swap when the liquidity is not enough.
It just takes extra 20-40 minutes to complete it.
How is this process going? Do you manually finalize such orders or just add liquidity for such a pair?
I did not check, but is there any information during the process that the execution of the order will be delayed due to the replenishment of the liquidity of the coin selected in the swap? It could be useful to the user if the swap lasts 20-40 minutes longer than usual.
Like we said earlier, our backup reserves kick in to complete swaps when liquidity is low.
That's why there's an extra 20-40 minutes. If an order is large, it's automatically shown as a backorder with a completion time of up to 6 hours, just to be safe.
I just want to say that sometimes there is a reason for not having the most perfect UX, and that's perfectly fine.
Could b1exch make their website extremely fast, "fix" their UX where you need to click a coin and wait for the page to reload? Of course they could.
But:
1. Some people value no-javascript websites, especially when dealing with privacy services. No js = worse UX; that includes having to be creative with the way they handle the coin selection, the order detection and its updates.
2. Using a tor middleware comes with trade offs, the main one is more instability and some random errors from time to time. They could just go for the easy route and risk being easily shutdown just for allowing people to swap coins (we have seen that happen to some others services), but they chose not to.
I respect their choice on some trade offs for more privacy and safety.

We've updated the CSS loader so now the whole swap widget feels like it's loading, instead of just one coin loading.
"
Normally, selecting the currencies I want to swap with takes a long time. Sometimes you need to refresh the page and select it again for it to actually be selected.
To be honest, I hadn't noticed this problem before. For me, the change happens relatively quickly (it feels like a 2-3 second wait, but I haven't measured it).
The update after the page refresh is done via JavaScript. Could it be that your browser is blocking it or that you have a plugin installed that is preventing the update? The easiest way to test this is to start your browser in incognito mode, where plugins are not normally loaded unless you have specifically allowed them.
I use the latest version of Brave and, as I said, I haven't noticed any problems yet!
We're not using any JavaScript - for the page refreshes.
28. Post 66475426 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 11:50:37 CET 2026) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
What happened with the liquidity funds on splash.tf, somehow I am convinced that earlier there was significantly more here compared to what is currently shown on the site?
I compared
September 24, 2025,
January 4, 2026 and
February 17, 2026, and don't really see much of a change. But it's hard to give exact values to fluctuating exchange rates.
29. Post 66474983 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 09:02:07 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Round 6 is now over, here are the results :Closing price on 04/03/2026 :
72 670$| Name | Prediction | Difference |
| GazetaBitcoin | 69 623,00 | 3 047,00 |
| ESG | 68 888,88 | 3 781,12 |
| xLays | 68 767,67 | 3 902,33 |
| LoyceV | 68 000,00 | 4 670,00 |
| Pmalek | 67 239,41 | 5 430,59 |
| Hypnotizer | 66 669,00 | 6 001,00 |
| promise444c5 | 66 500,00 | 6 170,00 |
| LogitechMouse | 65 696,69 | 6 973,31 |
| Danydee | 65 663,00 | 7 007,00 |
| examplens | 65 111,56 | 7 558,44 |
| Leahized | 65 000,00 | 7 670,00 |
| Doan9269 | 64 517,00 | 8 153,00 |
| BABY SHOES | 62 323,00 | 10 347,00 |
| cryptofrka | 1 000 000,00 927 330,00 |
Well played, GazetaBitcoin, you are the least worst predictor for this round. 50BTC have been added to your account.
cryptofrka, you want to play with fire, here's your 1.25% p.malus. Don't turn yourself into a pile of ashes.
BABY SHOES, with a difference of more than 10K compared to the price of BTC, here is a 1% p.malus.
Doan9269, you went in the wrong direction, here are your 0.75% p.malus.
BTC seems to be waking up, and you are not very good at making predictions, so for round 7, I'm going to give you a hand : you can make two predictions.
The winner of this round will only win 25BTC, but they will also get a “card” that has certain “powers.” I will give you just two words : protection and revenge.
Oh, and I also have a little announcement to make : my IT department, which manages the cash shop, needs to perform maintenance to upgrade the hardware. The cash shop will therefore be closed ~24 hours after the results of round 7 are announced and until the end of round 8. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Round 7 : The double prediction round
What will be the price of Bitcoin at
March 10, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 09/03/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before
March 07, 2026, 10:00:00 PM.
Cash shop:
OPEN Special rules :
Make two predictions with at least a 500$ difference between them.
The best of the two predictions will be selected.
For those with a malus/p.malus, the best prediction will be selected, and the malus will apply to that prediction.
30. Post 66474512 (unedited backup) (by Husna QA) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 03:40:19 CET 2026) in [Info] DT 1 dan DT 2 Berasal Dari Indonesia [Update tiap Bulan]:
Info terbaru DT Member bulan Maret 2026
DT1 Member
periode kali ini berjumlah sama dengan bulan sebelumnya yaitu 113 user-snip-Kang Husna kayaknya diremove jadi DT1 untuk bulan ini
Sumber:
DT update log Maret 2026Sedikit koreksi:
DT1 Member kali ini (Maret 2026) bukan 113 user melainkan 111—bisa dilihat kembali sumber aslinya.
Sepintas bisa dibandingkan juga antara kolom satu dan kolom dua dengan men-scroll hingga ke bawah, akan terlihat beda posisi scrollbar dan isinya.

Format tabel di atas saya modifikasi agar bisa membandingkan langsung daftar DT1 lama dan terbaru.
Saya tambahkan satu kolom untuk DT1 dari Indonesia. Sementara untuk daftar DT2—LoyceV biasanya memiliki daftar ini—, saya kurang tahu persis siapa saja yang berasal dari Indonesia.
Beberapa waktu yang lalu saya merombak kembali daftar trust saya*, entah apakah itu juga berpengaruh atau tidak.
Dulu juga saya seringkali melakukan update pada daftar trust tersebut, dan memang bergantian DT1 ⇆ DT2.
Jika dilihat pada daftar DT sebelumnya, theymos juga seringkali dari DT1 ke DT2 kemudian balik lagi DT1:
DT Member - Februari 2026DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 113 user
Daftar lama: theymos OgNasty Vod vapourminer philipma1957 babo Cyrus ibminer d5000 joker_josue Mitchell vizique albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS dbshck hybridsole stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner Real-Duke klarki The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja holydarkness Lafu polymerbit tweetious giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk julerz12 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB igebotz CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo sheenshane 3meek Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin TheBeardedBaby tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr anonymousminer Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 BlackHatCoiner Lillominato89 YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder apogio
| ----- | Daftar Baru: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 willi9974 NeuroticFish achow101 examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja holydarkness Lafu polymerbit AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Kryptowerk Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan RaltcoinsB igebotz El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal anonymousminer Lakai01 Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder apogio
|
| ----- | DT1 dari Indonesia: AakZaki Husna QA abhiseshakana YOSHIE
|
|
Sumber:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg66361122#msg66361122 * Terpaksa saya merombak Trust list—diantaranya user yang terkena tag negatif yang belum terselesaikan masalahnya—ataupun me
remove trust sesuai permintaan user bersangkutan yang memang tidak ingin berada di lingkup DT member sekalipun DT2.
31. Post 66474445 (unedited backup) (by Husna QA) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 02:29:19 CET 2026) in [Info] DT 1 dan DT 2 Berasal Dari Indonesia [Update tiap Bulan]:
Info terbaru DT Member bulan Maret 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah sama dengan bulan sebelumnya yaitu 113 user
-snip-Kang Husna kayaknya diremove jadi DT1 untuk bulan ini
Sumber:
DT update log Maret 2026Beberapa waktu yang lalu saya merombak kembali daftar trust saya*, entah apakah itu juga berpengaruh atau tidak.
Dulu juga saya seringkali melakukan update pada daftar trust tersebut, dan memang bergantian DT1 ⇆ DT2.
Jika dilihat pada data DT sebelumnya, theymos juga seringkali dari DT1 ke DT2 kemudian balik lagi DT1:
DT Member - Februari 2026DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 113 user
Daftar lama: theymos OgNasty Vod vapourminer philipma1957 babo Cyrus ibminer d5000 joker_josue Mitchell vizique albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS dbshck hybridsole stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner Real-Duke klarki The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja holydarkness Lafu polymerbit tweetious giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk julerz12 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB igebotz CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo sheenshane 3meek Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin TheBeardedBaby tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr anonymousminer Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 BlackHatCoiner Lillominato89 YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder apogio
| ----- | Daftar Baru: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 willi9974 NeuroticFish achow101 examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja holydarkness Lafu polymerbit AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Kryptowerk Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan RaltcoinsB igebotz El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal anonymousminer Lakai01 Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder apogio
|
| ----- | DT1 dari Indonesia: AakZaki Husna QA abhiseshakana YOSHIE
|
|
Sumber:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg66361122#msg66361122
* Terpaksa saya mengganti beberapa diantara user yang terkena tag negatif—yang belum terselesaikan masalahnya—ataupun me
remove trust sesuai permintaan user bersangkutan yang memang tidak ingin berada di lingkup DT member sekalipun DT2.
32. Post 66474415 (unedited backup) (by Chikito) (scraped on Thu Mar 5 02:01:08 CET 2026) in [Info] DT 1 dan DT 2 Berasal Dari Indonesia [Update tiap Bulan]:
Info terbaru DT Member bulan Maret 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah sama dengan bulan sebelumnya yaitu 113 user
Daftar lama: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 willi9974 NeuroticFish achow101 examplens nutildah minerjones irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja holydarkness Lafu polymerbit AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Kryptowerk Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan RaltcoinsB igebotz El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal anonymousminer Lakai01 Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder apogio
| ----- | Daftar Baru: theymos gmaxwell OgNasty vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Welsh d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hybridsole stompix hilariousandco willi9974 cryptodevil JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja Jet Cash holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood RaltcoinsB igebotz El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress sheenshane JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr anonymousminer Lakai01 Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 YOSHIE inspace Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist paid2 n0nce YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder apogio
|
| ----- | DT1 dari Indonesia: AakZaki abhiseshakana YOSHIE
|
|
Kang Husna kayaknya diremove jadi DT1 untuk bulan ini
Sumber:
DT update log Maret 2026
33. Post 66473947 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 23:02:20 CET 2026) in AML bot(ovi) za provjeru adresa:
Naisao sam na neke telegram botove koji daju nekoliko puta besplatnih AML provera. Znam da slackovic i examplens imaju dosta besplatnih,ali evo nekoliko aml botova koje mozete koristiti
@cryptoaml_bot
@green_stage_bot
@AlfaBitAml_bot
@CoinKYT_AML_bot
@USDTBlackList_bot
@QuppyAMLBot
@AML_checking_getblocknet_bot
@VafComplianceBot
To su neki od botova,placaju se ali u pocetku imate nekoliko free provera
34. Post 66473829 (unedited backup) (by Antikyc_) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 22:26:37 CET 2026) in 💙Antikyc.io | #1 Directory of Anonymous, no KYC Crypto Exchanges and Services💙:
Hello cLoazyL and thank you for expressing your concerns. As we have explained before on this thread, every exchange that is KYC level 0 will never ask you about KYC, ever (considering you are an antikyc user of course). Additionally, most of the KYC level 0 exchanges will even successfully process the exchange, while others will just refund the funds with no questions asked. The latter are clearly identified in the leaderboard with tags such as “Refunds high AML funds” for greater transparency.
You guarantee a certain amount for each listed exchange. Do you keep reserved funds somewhere for that (a confirmation would be possible)?
Do you have a direct agreement with each exchange, or do you only offer it based on what you read in their ToS? It is a bit unusual that you have gained so much trust, and a relatively new and unknown service.
Thank you for your comment, yes we keep reserved funds but we do not really provide any proof as of now.
As stated before in this thread, we have direct agreements with some exchanges, not all of them.
35. Post 66472999 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 18:13:01 CET 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I don't know who uses the TRC20 network at all, it's terribly expensive. I know that there is a thing with Tron Energy, which can reduce the network fee for these transactions, but what is the purpose if I have to buy an additional asset so that the transactions would be approximately as favourable as on other networks.
TRC20 was a lot cheaper to transact USDT when ETH had its DeFi/NFT bull run and every transaction costed $100. That's why it was known as the "cheaper" alternative. Now that no one hardly uses ETH again and there is no competition to see who snipes a monkey jpeg faster, it became cheaper.
36. Post 66472633 (unedited backup) (by CCECash) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 16:24:02 CET 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Actually, you're partly right. But I think people have a good impression of transactions on the Tron network because they're lightning fast and used to be very cheap. Perhaps it's due to subconscious past impressions.
I don't know who uses the TRC20 network at all, it's terribly expensive. I know that there is a thing with Tron Energy, which can reduce the network fee for these transactions, but what is the purpose if I have to buy an additional asset so that the transactions would be approximately as favourable as on other networks.
37. Post 66472461 (unedited backup) (by b1ack) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 15:40:55 CET 2026) in b1ack exchange |Automated Swap | Lowest fees | 24x7 | NO KYC | NO JS | TOR:
Hey! We have added Solana, Bitcoin Cash!
..
✅ Clearnet fixed and improved:
..
✅ Current stability:
..
✅ Bugs fixed:
..
✅ Cloudflare update:
..
✅ Pool page improvement: .
Probably the best answer to the recent DDoS and other attacks is platform improvement.
🔷 More chains coming soon
Do you have any target chains under consideration, or has the decision already been made?
Are these decisions based on user suggestions?
Could you add ETH Arbitrum for testing?
I agree with this proposal. I've been using the Arbitrum network often.
We're happy to announce new updates:
Clearnet fixed and improved: We've fixed clearnet issues and reduced gateway timeouts significantly. If you still get a "host is down" error, just refresh the page quickly. This might happen if the Tor middleware is temporarily down - a refresh will reconnect and work again.
I confirm that now both clear net links listed in the first post of the topic open quite quickly, although I applied the method of updating the page described by you to the first link. Everything is great

New coins added:
Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Solana (SOL)
Solana allows users to pay some of the cheapest fees of all cryptocurrencies, there really wasn't enough of it.
Avalanche has the lowest fees, even if it is not very common, like Solana, but if you wish, you can consider adding it to the list.
In development:
API
We'll keep improving.
The introduction and expansion of the API can really powerfully scale your product, for example, which can integrate exchange on third-party services and much more. We will be waiting for more news from you.
Summ: Magnificent and large-scale changes, each of which is huge and it is clear that you really care about the functionality, usability and reputation of your product.
We are working to add chains which have high volume of usage.
And the targets are just based on user suggestions and demand.
38. Post 66472081 (unedited backup) (by SageSwap) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 13:44:02 CET 2026) in SageSwap.io - The Privacy-First, KYC-free, NO-JS, Swap Service!:
Maybe we can increase the escrow so we can guarantee bigger tx volume, but I don't think we have to share the total transaction volume.
This was said earlier. Escrowed $2000 is enough and covers >90% of transactions by size.
It seems to me that this number is decreasing week by week. We are noticing higher transaction amounts all the time, but we think this is because people are trusting us more and more. The escrow will probably remain at $2,000 so that people who haven't heard of us can feel more secure.
39. Post 66470768 (unedited backup) (by ESG) (scraped on Wed Mar 4 01:09:31 CET 2026) in The ultimate battle royale for BTC price prediction | sponsored by 🌐 Bridgoro:
Lock & unlock
Everyone participated \o/ !
Here are your predictions for round 6 :| Name | Prediction |
| BABY SHOES | 62 323,00 |
| cryptofrka | 1 000 000,00 |
| Danydee | 65 663,00 |
| Doan9269 | 64 517,00 |
| ESG | 68 888,88 |
| examplens | 65 111,56 |
| GazetaBitcoin | 69 623,00 |
| Hypnotizer | 66 669,00 |
| Leahized | 65 000,00 |
| LogitechMouse | 65 696,69 |
| LoyceV | 68 000,00 |
| Pmalek | 67 239,41 |
| promise444c5 | 66 500,00 |
| xLays | 68 767,67 |
I've been wanting to say it for a while... but now it goes...
-Generally, I have a preference for alphabetical order, but in this case here,
don't you think it would be better to view if it was in numerical order?
| Name | Prediction |
|
|
| BABY SHOES | 62 323,00 |
| Doan9269 | 64 517,00 |
| Leahized | 65 000,00 |
| examplens | 65 111,56 |
| Danydee | 65 663,00 |
| LogitechMouse | 65 696,69 |
| promise444c5 | 66 500,00 |
| Hypnotizer | 66 669,00 |
| Pmalek | 67 239,41 |
| LoyceV | 68 000,00 |
| xLays | 68 767,67 |
| ESG | 68 888,88 |
| GazetaBitcoin | 69 623,00 |
| cryptofrka | 1 000 000,00 |
40. Post 66470469 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Tue Mar 3 23:28:13 CET 2026) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja [novi topic]:
Sto se tice AI pomaganja mislim da je u ovom takmicenju sveden na minimum jer svaki rad koji radis moras da uslikas progres,tacnije kako si krenuo od nule i to da postavis u album. Onda oni koji odlucuju o nagradama vide da je stvarno covek radio. Nebitno digital art,craft ili hand-drawn. Tako da koliko znam,nijednom nije bilo da je neki ucesnik koristio AI.
Dok se neko ne sjeti da i taj dio lažirala i da AI-u zadatak da upravo to uradi. Napravi dodatnih desetak crteža koji pokazuju kako je nastao finalni crtež. Sve od početne skice pa da završnog rada. Ne vjerujem da bi se dobar AI previše namučio da to izvede. Nikad nisam koristio ChatGPT da mu dajem instrukcije šta da crta ali pretpostavljam da i ovi osnovni/besplatni modeli imaju tu funkciju.
Mislim da je neko vec radio nesto slicno u pizza kontestu, vise kao test. Zadao je AI zahteve bas da budu u skladu sa pravilima, prva slika svi zacini, druga pravljenje podloge... sve do zavrsne slike gotove pizze. Izgledalo je prilicno originalno, nedostajalo je samo malo nesavrsenosti, rasutog brasna okolo, slucajno uslikana stolica u kadru. Ali za one koji su vešti u ovome, to nisu prepreke.
Ja se secam da su nekoga bili optuzili da mu je pizza napravljena preko AI. Covek se stvarno potrudio i napravio pizzu da su svi mislili da je AI,a ustvari remek delo

Slazem se sa vama,ako je neko vest,nece mu biti problem da napravi AI sta god bilo. Iskreno ne zelim da verujem da na takvom takmicenju ljudi varaju,jer gledam po sebi,utrosicu dosta vremena tako sto cu crtati ali uzivacu i u tome i jeste poenta Jako puno ljudi ima koji se trude,i stvarno premasuju ocekivanja.
@ovcijisir hvala na linkovima,samo kad stignes premesti u G&R temu

P.s. ovo za predvidjanjd BTC-a prosli put je neki lik pogodio skoro tacnu cenu ...
41. Post 66468723 (unedited backup) (by JustBeKause) (scraped on Tue Mar 3 15:54:55 CET 2026) in OgNasty doesn't give a shit. I disagree.:
I was going to post this in the thread @howardsentell made:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5576112.0It's basically about how both famous and newcomer manufacturers of physical bitcoin collectibles are no longer interested in participating in the bitcointalk.org forum. Even though howard made the thread, and I despise him and his butt-buddy spamming the forum with AI, I think it's a cool discussion to talk about. Too bad the discussion is being facilitated by an idiot and is perpetuating drama and slander onto very trusted users MMLLC/anonyminer, who called out howard and said butt-buddy for suspicious behavior.
I personally think that physical bitcoin collectibles participation has been steadily trending down after the U.S. government went after Mike because his coins were pre-loaded with currency. Yet... no one is talking about that in said topic.
______________
OgNasty, in particular, says that:
I've never scammed anyone. Why is the community ok with Vod’s constant lies and trust abuse? Why are people ok with those who include him in DT? I created keys that are holding millions of dollars for members of this community right now. If I can be attacked like this and nobody does anything after the hundreds of people I’ve protected with escrows, thousands of satisfied customers, and millions of dollars held on generated addresses for others, do you really think this community has any chance of retaining any new talent?
a.) You say you never scammed anyone? You ran a pass through for the biggest ponzi scam in bitcoin's entire history. Then, you posted in 2014 how "common sense plays a role", and you hoped that no one actually thought Patrick Harnett and Pirate were doing honest dealings:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=555881.msg6060228#msg6060228 Cool, now I know that I can scam people as long as I call them dumb for falling for it.
b.) You ask why people are ok with those who include him in DT? Refer to (a).
c.) You created keys that are holding millions of dollars for members of this community right now? Who cares? Refer to (b). DT isn't some list of users who have bad judgment.
d.) You whine like once or twice a week about being attacked but you can mis-label someone for years as a pedophile, mind you one of the worst things to be accused of nowadays. You slander the administrator of our forum and label him as a "useless observer" because he isn't sending Vod or anyone else that calls you out to detention.
e.) You say that you protected escrows, thousands of satisfied customers, and millions of dollars held on generated addresses for others. Again, who the fuck cares? For example, 99% of shitcoins don't perform as well as BTC and aren't taken seriously by big-time investors because the creators of said coins are "holding" the majority of the supply in their own wallets. Sure, they "won't sell", but what intelligent person acts on promises? What intelligent person would trust you with your history? I wouldn't touch you with a 10-foot digital pole.
f.) You say this community isn't retaining new talent because of one user, which is laughable. This forum is old-school. It doesn't attract nearly as much attention as other slop social sites, and it's probably for the best. I think you know that, but you just want to scapegoat the person suing you because...well I have no clue. You're one of those mysterious retards I think. Also, your coins suck and are the digital equivalent of a paperweight that literally collects bitcoin dust.
______________
Anyway,
Vod, you are such a loser. You keep talking about your frivolous lawsuit like I give a shit.
Really? You don't give a shit? You kind of sound like you do:
Format:
#.) Post/Archive link
Translation (of) Little Desperate Rascal -
1.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6568/65685433.htmlTLDR - "NOOooO you dont understand @KingsDen ! Im not in a LEGAL feud!? T_T I'm getting harassed! Yeah. yeah^_^...DT IS BEING WEAPONIZED!!!! HERE IS LIST OF ALL BAD DT!!! DDONT TTRRUST THEM!!!
2.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6568/65685611.htmlTLDR - OH UR ON MY SHIT LIST @Lillominato89 ? Here. Let ME teh great oGNasTY tell YOU the FACTS of why youre there! See, DT has been TAKEN OvER! WE CANT BE EXPECTED TO SPEND 14 YEARS to figure out WHO TO TRUSsSST!!! THAT LIST OF PEOPLE SUPPORT THE GUY SUING ME!!! OMFG O_O...
3.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6568/65685782.htmlTLDR - Wow @examplens ....you trust the guy suing ME?!? WTF? >_<... FILING that suit is NOT trustworthy behavior and it is NOT controversial for me to think THAT! gosh...
4.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6568/65689198.htmlTLDR - what the FRUNK (get it haha cybertrucks haha *drools*) do you not understand @Lafu !?!? YOU ARE SUPPORTING LAW WAREFARE TERRORISM...like...BE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY. BE. A. better. PErsONnn.
5.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6568/65689728.htmlTLDR - Privacy advocates?? Ha. Lol. LMAO, even!!! Those SAME privacy advocates support the guy SUING ME. CAN YOU BELEIVe IT!! These MONEY LAUNDERERS support NOTHING about privacy.
6.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6588/65881656.htmlTLDR - Finding a lawer for this BULLSHIT case was so hard! most advices me to IGNORE it.. HA. They said it was a DISSAPOINTMENT of filing.. You know what, I might as well AUCTION these LEGAL documents since they are a part of FORUM HISTORY. God im so fucking smaRRRT.
7.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6588/65883152.htmlTLDR - ALL Vod has to do is STOP harassing me. JEEZE. ARBITRATE WHAT? THere is NOTHING to talk about or discuss. its SO. Damn. SIMple.
8.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6589/65893786.htmlTLDR - UGHHHH this guy is sTILL making up lies about me WHILE suing me. WTH? WtFFFFF?

? I feel so sorry for him. PLZ anyone out there show Vod the LIGHT??? hes WASTING his money suing meee cuz IM the best and I NEVER EVER LOSE..
9.)
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6592/65927227.htmlTLDR - NOOOOOOOO ITS FREE SPEECH YOU DONT UNDERSTAND. I AM AN AMERICAN and will FIGHT for whats RIGHT. *Bald eagle screech*.
10.)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5562559.msg65929463#msg65929463TLDR - OgNasty posts an article about the woman at the Phillies game who took the ball from the child is suing the MLB for losing her job. Too bad the article doesn't exist, and when forum members point it out, Og is quick to play along with the *oopsie* act.
There's a lot more, but I'm tired of typing like an animal. You definitely give a shit, @OgNasty. The thing is, you fail to understand that there are a good few men watching your posts like hawks. What's done is done, homie. I'll conclude this thread with one of my personal favorite forum quotes of all time:
so lets get this shit straight, Nasty Mining had an IPO (you raised XXXBTC) you invested those funds in the wrong mining equipment (as you always manage to do) then when your exchange went down you decided to try and be a slippery cunt and change it to a fanclub..
so for everyone not aware - Mr OG nasty spent other peoples money and fucked up the whole enterprise to end up with less hashrate than one of my anal hairs.
-TMAN August 23, 2019