Last update: 2026-07-11_Sat_14.00h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none

Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66930068 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Jul 11 13:56:50 CEST 2026) in [ANN] bitcoindata.science:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:18:55 AM
@bitmover A few days ago, on another forum, we discussed gold as an investment. Without going into details or conclusions, one user proposed a very similar strategy in gold investment, to the one you and JayJuanGee did.
What do you think about the proposal to do a similar tool for gold, and the possibility of comparing this type of investment in two very "similar" assets, Bitcoin and gold?

I never thought about adding the same technical analysis to gold.

I just applied the 200 WMA to gold chart, since 1996 (30years)



Gold cycles are much longer (~10y bear markets)...  And they do have a strong indicatior when the 200WMA crosses the price.


I just became a bit worried about my position. I wouldn't want to hold this bag for 10 years  Cheesy But I still think it can go a bit further


2. Post 66929998 (unedited backup) (by tbct_mt2) (scraped on Sat Jul 11 13:25:19 CEST 2026) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: Yurkov on Today at 07:28:33 AM
As I wrote, I swapped Belgium for Spain, and it was a good choice, as Spain won 2-1. However, Djokovic unfortunately lost to Jannik quite decisively, 4-6, 4-6, 4-6. So, unfortunately, even though the parley looked good, it didn't work for me or you.

However, as for Norway, I think I'll take a chance in a single on them today.
Belgium played better than Portugal and they actually created more challenge for Spain than what did by Portugal. It's a little bit unlucky for Belgium when Courtois was injured and replaced by Lammens who actually played one of his biggest matches but also most stressed ones in his career so far. Spanish players likely got commands from De la Fuente to wait for second-ball situations and possibly Lammens knew about that too. He tried his best to control the ball but mistake was made and both Nico Williams and Merino only waited for that to take advantage and score a winning goal for Spain.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:33:29 AM
It seems there is no room for surprises here, stick with the favorites. 1.92 on England is not bad at all.
Switzerland and 5.6 are somehow better choices for me, somehow I got the impression that Argentina has spent all their luck, and it will be the hardest for them so far.
In two last quarter final matches, if there is surprise, I believe it will come from Norway, not Switzerland. Argentina are strong and experienced enough to beat Switzerland while England must be very careful with Norway and Haaland.


3. Post 66929952 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Jul 11 13:04:07 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (61) 14637 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 9958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5446 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4699 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2871 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3592 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2084 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6252 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2161 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (13) 6622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1916 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2368 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13694 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6264 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (34) 10138 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 744 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3923 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (67) 21185 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6356 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3107 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10109 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4204 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1959 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3555 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 12876 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1460 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2332 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2088 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9896 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2624 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7612 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4207 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3436 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 20945 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2920 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2564 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2593 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5742 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1603 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +49 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1510 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5642 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9833 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5343 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1279 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3546 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1005 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8773 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)


4. Post 66929099 (unedited backup) (by jayce) (scraped on Sat Jul 11 03:56:19 CEST 2026) in ----JAYCE DESIGNS---- Logo, Avatar, Signature, Banner, etc.:
Quote from: cygan on July 10, 2026, 12:32:08 PM
friendly BTCump!
feel free to contact this great designer if you need new designs for your projects and you'll be amazed by its results! Cool
Heyo cygan!
Thank you for the friendly bump and the kind words <3 Cheesy

Quote from: examplens on July 10, 2026, 12:45:18 PM
I'm looking at this first post, and as far as I can see a good part of the portfolio are images hosted on imgur which haven't been displayed on the forum for a long time. Switching to talkimg or bitlist would perhaps be constructive advice, it's a shame that previous works can't be seen due to a banal change.
Ah sure examplens, I always forgot to redo the ANN properly. Thank you mate Wink


5. Post 66927816 (unedited backup) (by marto25) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 19:49:55 CEST 2026) in [ANN] ZERO TRACE | Privacy Swap Aggregator | KYC Ratings | XMR Bridge | No KYC:
Quote from: examplens on July 09, 2026, 09:03:43 PM
Quote from: marto25 on May 26, 2026, 08:25:20 AM
Before you swap, you should know:
  • Does this exchange log your IP?
I'm curious, how can an aggregator know or be sure whether an exchanger logs the user's IP?
Is there a reliable method for such a check, or is everything based on "make my word". If this attribute is based on trust and belief in the word exchanger, what prevents bad actors from coming here and gaining unjustified trust?



Fair question.

ZERO TRACE itself logs nothing — no account, no IP, no analytics.
Pure HTML/JS running client-side.

The underlying exchanges (via Trocador API) are a different story — and that's exactly why the KYC Rating exists.

A-rated providers: no logging under any circumstances.
B/C-rated: may log under specific conditions — disclosed upfront.

We don't claim the third-party exchanges are log-free.
We make their policies visible before you commit.
That's the difference.

If a provider's logging policy changes or an incident surfaces — the rating gets updated. It's not set and forget.


6. Post 66927743 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 19:28:01 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
@examplens
Fair question — the escrow details, references and independent verification links are all documented on the site under the Reputation tab. Everything's in one place there so users don't have to hunt through the thread for scattered pieces.
Any specific question on what you find there — we're happy to elaborate directly.

@TypoTonic
Thanks for the first test and the honest write-up. 45 minutes on Chain mode BTC → USDT (TRC-20) is right in the expected range — glad it worked cleanly.
About Fast mode — it's been going through a rework for a while and comes back online across pairs as reserves are restored. Next time you swap, check the toggle for the pair you need. If it's active — you're in for a noticeably quicker experience.
Appreciate you noting the letter of guarantee too. Small signals like that matter more for building trust than any marketing line.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.


7. Post 66927422 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 17:50:49 CEST 2026) in [ANN] ZERO TRACE | Privacy Swap Aggregator | KYC Ratings | XMR Bridge | No KYC:
Quote from: examplens on July 09, 2026, 09:03:43 PM
I'm curious, how can an aggregator know or be sure whether an exchanger logs the user's IP?
Is there a reliable method for such a check, or is everything based on "make my word". If this attribute is based on trust and belief in the word exchanger, what prevents bad actors from coming here and gaining unjustified trust?
My guess is that it's based on trust. Many exchanges and similar services mention in their terms and privacy policies what they log and what kind of data they store from their users. So, they don't always hide it, and the information is out there. ZERO TRACE probably checks their claims based on the documentation available on their websites. But you are correct. A service with ulterior motives could lie and say they don't log this and that but still do it. 


8. Post 66926235 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 10:21:25 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :

@examplens
You're pushing us toward a more precise position, and honestly you're right to. Let us clarify the mechanics — because the refund story we described earlier deserves more detail so nobody gets misled.
Here's how Chain mode actually works:

User creates an order and sends coins to our address (not to the third-party pool directly)
We route the swap through a vetted pool
Coins from the pool arrive at the user's destination address

The pool never has direct custody of the user's original deposit. We do the routing. So if a pool refuses to execute for any reason — we still hold the user's original funds and send them back to the refund address. We don't freeze, hold, or block user funds under any circumstances. The user is not in a position where their coins are "stuck" and require KYC to release.
That's the design intent, and it's what makes the refund mechanism actually work as promised.
Where you're right to push us: we should say this clearly on the site. "We handle the refund from our side, not the pool's side, and we never block funds" is meaningfully different from "the refund mechanism kicks in" — and users deserve the precise version. We'll update the FAQ to spell out the routing mechanics so nobody has to guess.
Thanks for holding us to the precise answer.

@joniboini
You captured the right question — and yes, we should be proactive about explaining this. "We'll return your coins" as a reactive line does sound like a walkback, but it's actually the design principle from day one: we don't block, freeze, or hold user funds. Ever. Making that explicit on the site avoids the "vague promise" perception. Point taken.

@TryNinja
Fair concern, and worth addressing directly.
In our routing model, the user's original deposit stays under our control until the swap completes. So the "escrow dispute" scenario you're describing doesn't apply the same way — the user never handed their original coins to the third-party pool. If routing fails, we refund from our custody. We never block, freeze, or withhold funds — no conditions, no KYC required to release, ever.
The one thing we can't control is what happens on the destination side after coins are sent. If a user provides an address that gets flagged downstream (their own CEX freezing it, for example), that's between the user and their receiving service. But that's true of every crypto transaction, not something specific to Chain mode.
No escrow needed. No user-to-pool disputes. No blocking on our side. That's the point.
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.


9. Post 66925711 (unedited backup) (by SirJohnVonSlotty) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 04:22:55 CEST 2026) in Novosti:
Quote from: examplens on July 09, 2026, 10:56:24 AM
sumnja je sasvim opravdana.

Ovo mi je 50%-50%

Da se radi o manjem operateru, svakako.

Za bc.game ti je to mozda dnevni turnover.

No jel bi ja napravio marketinski trik u tom stilu? Definitivno Cheesy Tako da bi rekao da je 50-50 sansa.


10. Post 66924782 (unedited backup) (by Priamex.com) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 22:12:49 CEST 2026) in ☀️ Priamex ♻️ crypto exchange with zero traces - Fast & private - No limits:
Quote from: masulum on Today at 10:26:00 AM
Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM

We will also be adding a guaranteed deposit in the near future so users can feel confident in the service in practice.

This is a good decision to add letter of guarantee. Some exchange also apply guarantee money to campaign manager so the platform get more trust from forum member, maybe you also need to consider similar thing. I think you can also add the project on bitlist.co, because this platform is used by bitcointalk user to give review, so besides from trustpilot there is more place for user to give review and I haven't found priamex on bestchange, is this still in process?

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 07:28:02 AM
Quote from: Bitcoin_Arena on July 08, 2026, 10:19:46 PM
One day a client is going to have their funds frozen by one of the CEXs which will demand KYC verification, and this will come back to haunt you and probably mess up your reputation. The client will definitely say you lied. It's better a client knows what he is getting into beforehand.
This can be avoided by accepting deposits to an address under its control and conducting the necessary AML checks; if it fails to pass them, a refund is generated. The platform does not promote itself as noKYC, but since KYC may be requested, they must display the license number and necessary legal information.


Quote from: masulum on Today at 10:26:00 AM
Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM

We will also be adding a guaranteed deposit in the near future so users can feel confident in the service in practice.

This is a good decision to add letter of guarantee. Some exchange also apply guarantee money to campaign manager so the platform get more trust from forum member, maybe you also need to consider similar thing. I think you can also add the project on bitlist.co, because this platform is used by bitcointalk user to give review, so besides from trustpilot there is more place for user to give review and I haven't found priamex on bestchange, is this still in process?

We hear this concern and it's a fair one. To be clear: we operate without KYC, we do not collect or request identity documents from users under any circumstances. If a CEX liquidity partner in the routing chain freezes a transaction, that responsibility falls on us, not the client. The exchange is completed regardless: if the CEX does not unfreeze the funds, we complete the swap from our own reserves.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:43:03 AM
Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM
SFR10, the bug you pointed out has already been fixed.
Fixed by just changing the text or was something really done?

Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM
Regarding our AML policy: like any service, we strive to provide the best possible service, but our top priority is our users' privacy. In practice, our service does not have KYC procedures, and in certain cases we do process refunds.

Yamane_Keto, regarding reserves: we use mixed liquidity, which allows us to pay out funds to users directly from CEX platforms, since most users prefer to receive funds specifically from a CEX with minimal AML risk.
Mixed liquidity and no-KYC do not go together. This has been repeated several times, but here it is again. For the user, it is completely irrelevant that you do not ask for KYC if your liquidity partner will ask for it. Even that is a difficult situation, because in that case you are an unnecessary mediator.

Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM
We will also be adding a guaranteed deposit in the near future so users can feel confident in the service in practice.
What kind of deposit? Planning to deposit some funds in escrow here?

Quote from: rbynxx on Today at 04:33:52 PM
Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM
We will also be adding a guaranteed deposit in the near future so users can feel confident in the service in practice.
I think this should be urgently included in the service as it will be crucial for users. Confidence comes in different forms, but for someone who uses services that involve finance, I think that should be present at all times. By "near future", do you mean weeks or months?
Yes, this will be an escrow deposit. Terms are currently being finalized with Royse777. The deposit will be made within the next couple of days, we'll post the address and details here as soon as it's confirmed.

Quote from: uchegod-21 on Today at 12:30:35 PM
Welcome to the forum!
You did well by hitting the ground running immediately with a signature campaign. I became aware of this service from the campaign launched by AB De Royse777.
Feel free to interact with the community and be flexible to accept good suggestions that will help improve your services.
From this statement, it means that in some certain conditions, you do not process refunds and the funds are lost?
Quote from: Priamex.com on July 08, 2026, 04:24:22 PM
Regarding our AML policy: like any service, we strive to provide the best possible service, but our top priority is our users' privacy. In practice, our service does not have KYC procedures, and in certain cases we do process refunds.


to clarify, funds are not lost. "In certain cases we process refunds" refers to technical failures on the swap side or errors in the recipient address, not scenarios where client funds simply disappear. We'll tighten this wording in the ToS to remove any ambiguity.


11. Post 66924651 (unedited backup) (by MarryWithBTC) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 21:30:25 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Quote from: Hamza2424 on July 08, 2026, 08:09:41 PM
Quote from: MarryWithBTC on July 06, 2026, 01:29:47 PM
I understand your submission about low fee as regard BSC network. But I feel that anyone who is using a No KYC and No AML exchange is much more interested in privacy first and then fees come later. I know that for larger transactions, fees are important because a small difference in percentage could become a big fund.
Well, bro, the team has cleared this up for us as well. They are not here to pick one side but to provide all the options available, like an exchange, so that we can choose any pair for any reason that works best for us and meets our needs. You have taken the no KYC and no AML exchange a little too seriously because it is not always about privacy coins.

It is about exchanging coins without providing any documents, personal details, or anything else. Just visit the site, pay the commission fee, and exchange without hesitation or errors.
It is true that I have taken the No KYC and No AML exchange a little too seriously. Thanks for pinching me here. In the end the service is still an exchange where people pay attention to fees and not a mixer where privacy is the optimum goal.
The difference between this, and other non privacy CEXs could be the No KYC, No AML and the presence of XMR.

However, the team is committed to bringing a balance between fees and privacy, the reason for the launch of BSC network.

Quote from: Z-tight on Today at 02:53:26 PM
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:19:26 AM
It is clear that today, full no-KYC is very difficult to achieve and that it also brings some additional complications. I am of the opinion that such information must be declared on the site so that there are no surprises for the user
Yeah, you are correct, but 'no-kyc' is still very true in the case of DEX fo. In Fast Mode, with their own liquidity, the service guarantees never to ask for kyc from their users, which they have kept to up until now.

Now in Chain Mode with third party LP's, we are yet to get any reports of tx's stuck and kyc being requested. However, since it is a third party, on the off chance that it happens, funds would be returned to the refund address provided by the customer. I believe that makes it fully no-kyc, because under no condition, both in Chain or Fast Mode would you be required to provide where you live, where your funds came from or what you ate that morning.
I do not trust DEX statement based on "No one has ever been asked for KYC", but I trust their statement for their reassurance that if for any reason the swap doesn't go through, your funds are returned. This rightly explains why the refund address is mandatory.


12. Post 66924032 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 18:33:02 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
@examplens
Appreciate the thoughtful framing — but let us be clear on one thing, because it matters:

DEX.fo is fully no-KYC. Always has been, always will be.
In both modes — Fast and Chain — you will never be asked for documents, identity, or source of funds. Not by us, not by anyone in the process. That's not a marketing line, it's the core design principle the whole service is built on.
The refund mechanism we mentioned isn't a KYC fallback — it's the opposite. If a swap ever can't complete for any reason, the coins go straight back to your refund address. No questions, no forms, no "verify to release funds."
The user is never put in a position where KYC becomes the price of getting their money back. That's exactly what separates a real no-KYC service from one that quietly falls back on verification when things get complicated.
We'll add a clear statement to the FAQ confirming this in plain language — so there's zero ambiguity for anyone reading before their first swap.

@TokenTikas
You said it perfectly — under no condition, in either mode, will anyone ask where you live, where your funds came from, or what you ate that morning. 🙂 That's the whole point of what we built.
Fair take on the ETA too — one fast data point isn't enough to change the display. The 30-60 min range is calibrated for the realistic worst case (network congestion, slow blocks). Under-promising and over-delivering is the safer UX until a consistent pattern shows otherwise.
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.


13. Post 66923877 (unedited backup) (by uchegod-21) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 17:47:14 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: SamReomo on Today at 05:08:26 AM
Quote from: uchegod-21 on July 08, 2026, 12:48:43 PM
In which conditions do we know that we do not need to check?
When you use a service that you trust?
When  you receive coins directly from a centralized exchange wallet then you don't need to do any kind of AML score check because those coins are mostly low in AML and can be used without rethinking about the AML scoring.
Oh okay. That's correct. It is usually CEXS that flags coins of high AML, it is understandable that every coin emanating from it should have a low AML score.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:26:17 AM
Quote from: uchegod-21 on July 08, 2026, 11:21:58 PM
This seems more believable. I would rather go with this because it has clear analysis of the coin movement. It's better than displaying a score without showing how the result was arrived.
Some of the other tools listed above also provided additional analytics, but I deliberately shortened it to just the results.
It seemed too risky to me, especially because I knew the source of the coins could be suspicious, so I decided to do additional mixing.
Okay. That is how experts succeed in this space. You are simply aware of the environment, hence the suspension. An average jeo will easily get into troubles if care is not taking.

Binance once flagged my BTC from a casino, the mistake I made was not testing.


14. Post 66923725 (unedited backup) (by YIFI) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 16:59:19 CEST 2026) in 🔄 YiFi.io - Swap Aggregator | DEX+CEX+Private Routes | No-KYC | On-chain Yield:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:21:34 PM
It wouldn't be bad if you posted here the changes in the next update, which suggestions you accepted and which you rejected, and the possible reason for that. This could help users better understand the direction you want to go.
Anyway, I understood that the platform has just been set up and that there will be a lot of additions in the near future.

Hey! Great idea. We'll definitely make a post about implemented features and updates. We've already made an update of our main page UI. We have big plans for the service's development, and the review campaign has greatly contributed to it.


15. Post 66923707 (unedited backup) (by Z-tight) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 16:53:31 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:19:26 AM
It is clear that today, full no-KYC is very difficult to achieve and that it also brings some additional complications. I am of the opinion that such information must be declared on the site so that there are no surprises for the user
Yeah, you are correct, but 'no-kyc' is still very true in the case of DEX fo. In Fast Mode, with their own liquidity, the service guarantees never to ask for kyc from their users, which they have kept to up until now.

Now in Chain Mode with third party LP's, we are yet to get any reports of tx's stuck and kyc being requested. However, since it is a third party, on the off chance that it happens, funds would be returned to the refund address provided by the customer. I believe that makes it fully no-kyc, because under no condition, both in Chain or Fast Mode would you be required to provide where you live, where your funds came from or what you ate that morning.


16. Post 66923420 (unedited backup) (by YIFI) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 15:24:55 CEST 2026) in 🔄 YiFi.io - Swap Aggregator | DEX+CEX+Private Routes | No-KYC | On-chain Yield:
🎉 YiFi Review Campaign: Successfully Completed & Results Wrap-Up 🎉

Hello community!

We are excited to announce that our official **YiFi Review Campaign** has come to a successful conclusion! We would like to express our deepest gratitude to all the Bitcointalk members who took the time to test our platform, provide constructive feedback, and share their honest opinions.

To maintain complete transparency and showcase the amazing response from the community, we have compiled the full list of participants along with direct links to their detailed reviews below:

Bitcointalk UsernameDirect Link to Review
shasanRead Review 🔗
examplensRead Review 🔗
albonRead Review 🔗
katanic97Read Review 🔗
CookdataRead Review 🔗
StrongkoredRead Review 🔗
FinneysTrueVisionRead Review 🔗
WoodieRead Review 🔗
zasad@Read Review 🔗
summonerrkRead Review 🔗

The feedback we received is highly valuable, and our development team is already analyzing the suggestions to implement improvements in the upcoming updates.

You can also check the full discussion in our main campaign thread: YiFi Review Campaign Thread

Thank you for being a part of the YiFi journey! Stay tuned for more updates.


17. Post 66922509 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 09:34:49 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
@MarryWithBTC
Fair point — 30-60 min as displayed still holds up as an honest range based on your own experience across multiple swaps. Appreciate you sharing the full spectrum, not just the good outlier. That's the kind of data that actually helps other users calibrate expectations.
@bitmover
Good clarification on how you're counting "complete" — unconfirmed-but-broadcast with a healthy fee rate is a reasonable point to consider a swap in motion. And you're right, there's no incentive for any legitimate exchange to double-spend a client's incoming funds before confirmation — the economics don't work in the exchange's favor even in bad faith.
@Z-tight
Thanks — that's exactly the balance we're trying to strike. We can't promise a fully self-contained system in Chain mode since it involves third-party pools by design, but we can promise we did the vetting on our end and built a safety net (mandatory refund address) for the edge cases. Appreciate you laying it out clearly for others reading this thread.
@examplens
This is a fair and important correction, and we're not going to argue with it.
You're right — "we don't require KYC/SoF" is only a guarantee about our side of the transaction. In Chain mode, the swap genuinely routes through third-party liquidity, and we can't issue a blanket guarantee about every possible pool's behavior in every jurisdiction, even with careful vetting on our end.
What we can honestly say:
— We select pools that don't run KYC/screening as their standard operating procedure
— We've never had a Chain mode swap get stuck requiring KYC from a user
— If something ever did get refused, the refund mechanism kicks in rather than the user being asked for documents
But "we've never seen it happen" is different from "it's structurally impossible," and you're right to draw that line. For users who want a guarantee with zero third-party dependency, Fast mode (our own reserves, no bridges) is the more accurate answer once it's back online. Chain mode is the trade-off of lower fees for a small amount of routing dependency.
Thanks for holding us to precise language here — vague guarantees don't help anyone in this niche.
@Hamza2424
Well summarized. The service exists to give options for different priorities — some users are optimizing for absolute privacy, others for cost, others for speed. None of those are the "wrong" reason to use a no-KYC exchange. The common thread across every pair we offer is simply: no documents, no registration, no explanation required. What each user optimizes for beyond that is entirely up to them.
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.


18. Post 66921929 (unedited backup) (by BitMaxz) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 01:58:07 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 07:01:15 AM
Some of the tools are Telegram bots. For example, there is the Bitcoin AML Checker. It's a paid service, though. The first check is free. You have to pay $0.05 in BTC for subsequent checks.
There is another Telegram AML checking tool called GreenStage.
Also, the Blockchain explorer shows AML ratings on their website. Enter an address and check the results towards the bottom to see what it says.

I haven't tested any of these and don't know how reliable the information they show is. Generally, the only thing that matters is what the custodial service you deposit your coins into says and nothing else.

The blockchair explorer under dApp seems all addresses giving similar results. I tested 3 addresses the other AML checker seems to be giving low results on the Telegram AML checker.
It seems the one shared by examplens above is giving me a better risk result than the other AML checkers.
The blockchain dApps look like they are just a design; when clicking the source, it's asking for payment. Anyway, thanks.


19. Post 66921815 (unedited backup) (by uchegod-21) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 01:22:01 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:42:04 PM
Quote from: uchegod-21 on Today at 12:48:43 PM
That is true that the result is not universal. Does this mean that a fraudulent service could decide to only be dishing out misleading and wrong scores to make their service look good even when they do nothing?

If there is contradicting scores from two checkers, what do we use as standard? Do we base it on the reputation of the project?
Contradictory results with two different checkers are almost certain.
Here's an example I did yesterday for the same address, but on two different checkers. You can see that the score result varies from 17% to 86%, quite a big difference in risk recognition, right?


This seems more believable. I would rather go with this because it has clear analysis of the coin movement. It's better than displaying a score without showing how the result was arrived.

Further more, someone might begin to question how even a coin used for ransom was captured in the analysis. Ransom, Scam, Stolen coin. What's the difference between a scam coin and a stolen coin?


20. Post 66921637 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu Jul 9 00:14:14 CEST 2026) in Novosti:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 06:59:38 PM
Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 05:23:27 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:08:07 PM

Od samog početka je znao da razgovara sa scammerom i samo je tratio njegovo vrijeme.
Ja sam se dosta dugo vremena na taj način zabavljao na Telegramu, pokušavao tratiti scammerima vrijeme koliko god je bilo moguće, jer sam se nekako vodio mišlju da ako priča sa mnom koji zna da je scammer, ima manje vremena prevariti nekoga tko je još nov i naivan.

Nakon nekog vremena naravno da je dopizdilo, ali skuzis da su većina tih prevaranta obični debili, nikakvi mastermindovi.
Meni je ovo nekad bilo zabavno.
Ne znam koliko znate ili se secate slucaja $7 miliona i bc.game, gde smo nas sedmorica dobili nagradu od $7k. Nekoliko dana kasnije, kontaktira me lik preko Telegrama, predstavlja se kao iz redakcije nekog uglednog news sajta i zeli napraviti reportazu o tom slucaju.
Rec po rec, hteo je dokaz da sam zaista dobio taj novac i naravno, najbolji nacin za to je da mu prebacim nesto Ethereuma i tako potvrdim celu pricu (on ce to odmah vratiti). Na to se nadovezao i sa drugim accountom koji je imao malu razliku tipa 'l' umesto 'i' u odnosu na originalan forum account.
Na kraju sam pristao da posaljem ETH kako bih mu udovoljio i verifikovao celu pricu, te mu trazio random 4 cifre. Bas se razocarao kada je video da sam mu poslao 0.00001234 ETH

Nemoj me zajebavati da ste vas sedmorica dobili nagradu od $7k?? Daj mi nesto vise o tome,jel to bilo ovde na forumu ili si neki tiket pogodio ili ne daj Boze slotove igrao hehe. Necu da komentarisem tog lika sto je hteo reportazu da napravi. Na sta su sve ljudi spremni samo da ne uzmu motiku u ruke


21. Post 66921123 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Wed Jul 8 21:25:14 CEST 2026) in Novosti:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 06:59:38 PM
Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 05:23:27 PM
Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 04:08:07 PM

Od samog početka je znao da razgovara sa scammerom i samo je tratio njegovo vrijeme.
Ja sam se dosta dugo vremena na taj način zabavljao na Telegramu, pokušavao tratiti scammerima vrijeme koliko god je bilo moguće, jer sam se nekako vodio mišlju da ako priča sa mnom koji zna da je scammer, ima manje vremena prevariti nekoga tko je još nov i naivan.

Nakon nekog vremena naravno da je dopizdilo, ali skuzis da su većina tih prevaranta obični debili, nikakvi mastermindovi.
Meni je ovo nekad bilo zabavno.
Ne znam koliko znate ili se secate slucaja $7 miliona i bc.game, gde smo nas sedmorica dobili nagradu od $7k. Nekoliko dana kasnije, kontaktira me lik preko Telegrama, predstavlja se kao iz redakcije nekog uglednog news sajta i zeli napraviti reportazu o tom slucaju.
Rec po rec, hteo je dokaz da sam zaista dobio taj novac i naravno, najbolji nacin za to je da mu prebacim nesto Ethereuma i tako potvrdim celu pricu (on ce to odmah vratiti). Na to se nadovezao i sa drugim accountom koji je imao malu razliku tipa 'l' umesto 'i' u odnosu na originalan forum account.
Na kraju sam pristao da posaljem ETH kako bih mu udovoljio i verifikovao celu pricu, te mu trazio random 4 cifre. Bas se razocarao kada je video da sam mu poslao 0.00001234 ETH
Moja omiljena fora dok sam imao volje za to je bila dok su transakcije na ETHu bile super skupe. Glumio bi totalnu budalu i pristao da im pošaljem koliko već traže USDT ali nažalost nemam ETHa za transakciju. Dvojica su mi čak i poslali. Ono što mi je najčudnije, nitko nikada nije tražio moju adresu da provjeri ako imam USDT ili ETH na njoj  Grin


22. Post 66921069 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Wed Jul 8 21:08:01 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: Forsyth Jones on July 06, 2026, 07:17:22 PM
Don't tarnish the name of business owners  Cheesy business owners are generally honest people. The bureaucrats who produce these horrendous laws are just crooks. If we think about this way, a drug dealer is also a businessman  Grin

The difference lies in the morality of the services these people provide, which generate genuine value for society or simply break people's legs to sell crutches, creating problems to sell unique solutions.
Politics is easier when we read some books. I have not read much except the ones in schools or other institutions, and the only thing I have learned so far is that they will create a monopolized environment which will be full of dangers and threats, and then they will sell the solution. They will be the Homelander haha.

The policies they shape or rewrite are not to serve the free market. This is how they monopolize, create distinction and inequality, and preserve the state's own market share or their share haha. In short, they can sell us anything at gunpoint in a legal way.

Quote from: examplens on July 07, 2026, 10:33:14 AM
Check the service from my signature, they recently implemented a free AML check tool.
Please note that the result of any AML check is not universal, and some services may have different scores. It is very important that the service to which you send coins performs AML analysis.
You are right, the results can vary as every service has different ways and formulas. But if your AML is very high, like the one you need to fear, then I guess every AML site will give a high result, and that is enough to be prepared when using an exchange, like receiving payment from a person whose wallet is connected to wallets that had high AML, and like a virus, that AML moved onto us.


23. Post 66920218 (unedited backup) (by DEX.fo_off) (scraped on Wed Jul 8 16:52:37 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
@TokenTikas
Thanks for the honest note about the thread's early days — you're right, it took a while before the discussion picked up. Consistent testing and honest feedback from users like you is what actually gets a thread from zero to real traction. We remember who showed up first. 🙏
Looking forward to your Fast mode review when it's back online. Should be worth the wait.
@bitmover
3 minutes on BTC → ETH is a great result — congrats on catching a good moment. About the ETA display — this is a fair UX point and examplens explained the reasoning perfectly below 👇. But you're right that "3-60 minutes" or "typically under 30 minutes" would communicate reality more accurately. We'll look at how to phrase it without triggering panic for the outlier cases stompix described. Both angles matter.
@examplens
You called it exactly right — 30-60 minute display is a defensive UX choice. When users have skin in the game, unmet expectations feel much worse than exceeded expectations. A 3-minute delivery on a "up to 60 minutes" promise is a positive surprise. A 30-minute delivery on a "3-60 minutes" promise feels like a broken promise, even if the actual time is identical.
On your Chain mode question — honest answer:
The routing itself happens through third-party bridges and LPs, so technically there's a middle layer we don't fully control. What we guarantee is: no KYC requests from us, no SoF questionnaires from us, no freezing from our side. The coins arrive to your specified address after the swap completes on the pool side.
If a specific pool ever refuses to process a swap for any reason (rare but not impossible with certain jurisdictional pools) — the funds return to the refund address you provided at order creation. Never held indefinitely, never subject to additional user requirements. That's why the refund field is mandatory — it's the safety net for exactly this scenario.
Also worth noting: we deliberately choose pools that don't run KYC or address screening on their end. Not all LPs work the same way. We do the vetting so the user doesn't have to.
@FP91G
Thanks for pulling the direct quote from our FAQ — saves us repeating ourselves and confirms the position officially. 🙏
@stompix
Perfect breakdown on both points. The BTC block timing story is exactly why we err on the safe side with the ETA. Users seeing a fast-in-fast-out framing then hitting a mempool congestion event get frustrated in a way that's hard to unwind — even though the delay is on the network side, not ours.
On the refund logic — you're spot on. When a pool refuses to process, our system automatically pushes to the refund address. No manual intervention needed, no held funds. Design intent from day one.
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.


24. Post 66920073 (unedited backup) (by stompix) (scraped on Wed Jul 8 16:13:38 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:49:48 PM
I think that they deliberately gave the expected loss here so that users would not panic if it takes longer than 3 minutes, and that seems to me quite justified, knowing the behavior habits of many users. This is how you got more than you expected, considering that you were prepared to wait 30+ minutes, and everything was finished in just 3.

Yeah, nobody will like it if the minimum shown waiting time is so low and they are unlucky and only hit the 30-40 minutes time frame.

Bitmover was lucky, I happened to be the opposite and made the exchange exactly in the break when the mined Bitcoin block took 35+ minutes from the previous one, now imagine you sent those at the minimum low fees and the next block that waited that much will be full of more expensive tx so another one...and so on..it could easily above that time, and as I saw and keep seeing, a ton of new users are really unfamiliar with this "feature" Bitcoin has, they are always expecting a tx to clear in 2-3 minutes.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:49:48 PM
btw. about chain mode, I've been wanting to ask for some time, but since the complete order execution here does not depend only on Dex.fo, can it be guaranteed that there will be no freezing coins or any additional requirements, KYC, SoF...

Not even going to pretend I know anything about this, but my hunch is that if it ever happens for a liquidity pool to refuse the funds, the deal they have in place would mean refunding the coins.


25. Post 66920038 (unedited backup) (by FP91G) (scraped on Wed Jul 8 16:04:07 CEST 2026) in DEX.fo — Automatic Crypto Exchange | No KYC/AML | BTC ETH XMR LTC DAI USDT | :
Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:49:48 PM

btw. about chain mode, I've been wanting to ask for some time, but since the complete order execution here does not depend only on Dex.fo, can it be guaranteed that there will be no freezing coins or any additional requirements, KYC, SoF...
Do you need any documents from me in order to exchange?
No. We are a non-KYC exchange. We also never require SoF.
https://dex.fo/questions



26. Post 66919763 (unedited backup) (by uchegod-21) (scraped on Wed Jul 8 14:48:43 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: examplens on July 07, 2026, 10:33:14 AM
Check the service from my signature, they recently implemented a free AML check tool.
Please note that the result of any AML check is not universal, and some services may have different scores. It is very important that the service to which you send coins performs AML analysis.
That is true that the result is not universal. Does this mean that a fraudulent service could decide to only be dishing out misleading and wrong scores to make their service look good even when they do nothing?

If there is contradicting scores from two checkers, what do we use as standard? Do we base it on the reputation of the project?

Quote from: SamReomo on July 05, 2026, 07:43:08 AM

You are right, we should check the AML scores, but sometimes we just know that we do not have to.
In which conditions do we know that we do not need to check?
When you use a service that you trust?


27. Post 66917153 (unedited backup) (by Lytvynets1) (scraped on Tue Jul 7 19:08:43 CEST 2026) in FixedFloat — 0.0851 BTC frozen, no timeline, no answers (Order ZNTBD7):
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:40:54 AM
Lytvynets1, can you track the further flow of your coins based on the transaction?
Are they really on one of the FF addresses, or are they used further in other orders. Also if they added them to the pool, doesn't that mean they "contaminated" all the other coins in that way?

Quote from: fixedfloat on July 06, 2026, 03:33:06 PM
Once the review is completed, we either resume the exchange or return the funds, depending on the outcome.
Are you claiming that in any scenario, the user will get his coins back?

Yeah, I thought the same thing—that all their coins were compromised—but FF explained it: they said it’s standard practice for their service.

P.S. I’m currently in contact with FF, and I might get my funds back. I’ll be sure to let you know here how it all turns out.


28. Post 66916983 (unedited backup) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on Tue Jul 7 18:19:43 CEST 2026) in rby alternative account KingsDen?:
Quote from: examplens on July 05, 2026, 08:10:29 PM
Quote from: KingsDen on July 04, 2026, 10:56:36 AM
- This matter was also brought out in the Altcoinstalks talk forum where the admins and judges looked into the matter and didn't find me guilty - https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=343646.0
I was involved in the analysis of your & rby case on the altt forum. I believe that you received a detailed explanation from the moderator about the final conclusion that was reached there.
On that forum, moderators have additional insight into the account's access history, and there was no connection found between the two accounts. This was crucial for your KingsDen account to remain "intact" and without any markings. (For rby it is a completely different outcome)
You also probably received a verbal warning that the moderators there are not convinced of your 100% innocence, similar to the reasons nutildah mentions here. I will not go into a detailed explanation here either, in my opinion, the case is closed, unless some new information appears

I didn't want to weigh in, but as that mod/judge that closed the case on behalf of the court, I'll add that a tied court isn't exactly the best defence to be pointing to for a few good reasons. Firstly, it indicates that half the court believed you were guilty, the other half considered there to be reasonable doubt (not guilty). As examplens said, we looked at a lot more than just the prosecuting evidence; we also looked under the hood, did our own linguistic analysis, and accepted the defence evidence. But also bare in mind that we were only looking at evidence of multi-accounting on the other forum from when it feasibly possible (namely September 2024, the sign up date). Whether the account was used as part of a farm before then is not something we strongly considered, as not relevant to us there.

Aside from all that, not only are the two forums different, but the way in which tags are distributed is very different. On here it's a lot more decentralized involving hundreds of DT members, on altt it is more centralized among a handful of elected/appointed officials (as it's a smaller forum). Thus the difference in these tags is undoubtedly based on the different levels of requirements for evidence of guilt. On altt beyond reasonable doubt is the general threshold; on here, it's effectively if a member deems the evidence to be good enough. Also the access to evidence that DT members have here is less than what we have elsewhere. That's not to say one system is better than the other, only that they are distinctly different (that's a feature not a bug as they say). Negative tags here won't necessary exclude you from signature campaigns, on altt it will destroy the ability to monetise your account overnight as it's considered more authoritative.

As for rby, requesting account deletion is more of less an admission of guilt in my eyes. It arrived after hoods had already been peaked under, and yeh, good chance there are other accounts connected here even if KingsDen was not one of them (one of them with neutral feedback for suspected association with another account notably). The only reason we didn't produce a verdict was out of convenience, there was no need to deliberate over an account that's requesting self-destruction.

In summary, apples and oranges. The different results can't be compared directly. I'd argue that KingsDen doesn't deserve a negative tag on the other forum, but that he does deserve negative tags on this forum based on the evidence presented (and lack of meaningful and accessible defence). In precisely the same way that 4 DT members have tagged you believing the evidence to be sufficient, while another 4 DT members might not believe the evidence to be sufficient, even if they haven't directly left the positive trust to affirm that opinion. That's precisely how the system works here, or at least should work, and why having +4 doesn't contradict having -4 either. It's the same +2 and -2 that resulted in the on-tagging elsewhere effectively, leaving you with overall neutral trust. The systems may be different, but the current outcome is more similar than meets the eye.


29. Post 66911934 (unedited backup) (by Daniel91) (scraped on Mon Jul 6 08:50:37 CEST 2026) in Zbirni topic za davanje merita za kvalitetne postove:
Quote from: cryptofrka on July 05, 2026, 06:42:00 AM
Quote from: SirJohnVonSlotty on July 04, 2026, 07:11:58 PM
Ne znam koji mi je tocan overview merita, ali sam siguran da je posten postotak zahvaljujuci vama.

Imaš dosta info o tome na BPIP-u pa prokopaj ako ti je interesantno.

Ovo ti je top 10:

dkbit98   215
LoyceV   131
cryptofrka   74
Rikafip   68
Pmalek   67
FatFork   54
Trofo   39
Daniel91   30
ovcijisir   28
examplens   26

Znači 9/10 ti je naših. Apes strong together.

Vrlo zanimljiva statistika, hvala na dijeljenju.
Nisam znao da je LoyceV podijelio toliko merita našim članovima, svaka mu čast, trebali bi ga častiti jednom  Grin
Znači dkbit98 je naš merit šampion, a hvala također i ostalima, cryptofrka, Rikafip, Pmalek itd.
A da nema sirJohnija trebalo bi ga izmisliti, zahvaljujući njemu postalo je još zanimljivije na našem lokalu.


30. Post 66908587 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Sun Jul 5 08:42:01 CEST 2026) in Zbirni topic za davanje merita za kvalitetne postove:
Quote from: SirJohnVonSlotty on July 04, 2026, 07:11:58 PM
Ne znam koji mi je tocan overview merita, ali sam siguran da je posten postotak zahvaljujuci vama.

Imaš dosta info o tome na BPIP-u pa prokopaj ako ti je interesantno.

Ovo ti je top 10:

dkbit98   215
LoyceV   131
cryptofrka   74
Rikafip   68
Pmalek   67
FatFork   54
Trofo   39
Daniel91   30
ovcijisir   28
examplens   26

Znači 9/10 ti je naših. Apes strong together.


31. Post 66907762 (unedited backup) (by LUZUMYY) (scraped on Sat Jul 4 23:44:13 CEST 2026) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Quote from: examplens on July 02, 2026, 12:30:51 PM
There is no deadline by which DAI will exist, and it is possible to swap it 1:1 for USDS (and in the opposite direction), so for now I don't see any rush to exclude DAI as an option.
Honestly, I don't see the need to rush to delist DAI.
Exactly, I see no reason to delist it; I use DAI because it can't be confiscated.
Its primary reasons for creation include:


32. Post 66905955 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Jul 4 15:15:20 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (61) 14572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 9935 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1765 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4693 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2868 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3528 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2767 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9838 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6673 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2068 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6248 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (12) 6602 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1528 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3718 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (34) 10098 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4395 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3919 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2821 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4585 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (67) 21140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6355 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3105 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 9997 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1956 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3844 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2297 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4607 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15584 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 12850 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2316 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2081 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2621 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7568 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3431 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 20872 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5740 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1598 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +47 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3730 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4087 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1558 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5630 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8081 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1883 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5343 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6416 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1278 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3534 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1004 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +43 / =0 / -0) (8732 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)