I just did so now. Same issue. Shows: "
An Error Has Occurred!
Sorry Guest, you are banned from using this forum!
For security, your account has been locked. Email locked...@bitcointalk.org"

Don't want to go too off from the topic; but I would agree that Bitcointalk is an amazing forum, engagements here and there and yes none is like it.

However, the reason I was banned on Reddit is unknown since it's not just an occasional event it happens once I create an account close to the name ivy- it gets banned, maybe IP or something else is the case but I still have access to those accounts and allowed to view but not replying to any content on Reddit.

We will review fee-free minimum exchange amounts for different pairs.
Fortunately, we still have plenty of time to calculate this since the first 6 months will be fee-free for all any exchange amount.

---

Thanks for the idea, we will add it to our discussion list with my teammate.

---

Totally agree with you.
From our perspective, the first 6 months of fee-free exchanges are about building a core community.
After that, if we don't find a better solution, the service fee will be applicable for each exchange operation.

---

Thanks for your feedback.

---

No worries, we are old-school and not fans of the subscription model.
Once again, there will be no subscription model.

---

There is no need for concern here, as all prices are taken directly from CoinMarketCap (CMC) and we don't add any extra %.
You can verify this yourself by checking any exchange offer and doing the calculation.

However, please pay attention to the Price Margin value.
Price Margin is the difference between the market price of the cryptoasset and the added price of the seller.
0% -> equal to the CMC market price
-0.1% or lower -> cheaper than the market price
+0.1% or higher -> above the market price

---

Good idea!
We will definitely add this UX improvement in a future update.

---

Please keep in mind that only Level 3 accounts and higher will be able to participate in voting.
This is to prevent spam voting from newly created accounts and ensure that only real, active Bridgoro users have a voice in the decision-making process.

---

Don't worry, we aren't looking for any general sponsorships, as we want to stay fully independent in all aspects.
In the future, we may consider something like marketing sponsorships or integrations, but it's too early to focus on that now. At this stage, our main priority is building a community.
We also understand how projects succeed: the community's voice is important. That's why all ideas will be discussed with our active users (high-level accounts on Bridgoro).
And if we don't come up with a sustainable monetization model, then of course, the service fee will be applied to every trade.

---

We already have a solution, thanks to one of the Bitcointalk members (LoyceV).
We will be making small exchange offers fee-free. The exact threshold for what counts as a "small amount" will be decided once we complete our research and calculations on Dust Transactions and Dead Wallet Amounts.

---

In this case, we recommend using this cheat sheet as a quick reference.
0% -> good deal (market price)
-0.1% or lower -> very good deal
+0.1% or higher -> bad deal

---

Nah, we believe that making small-amount exchange offers fee-free is the better approach. It's also our way of showing gratitude to the community.

I like the idea of a coin list vote and planning this after the release is better it can generate fresh problems if a new list is made now and integrated. Voting will allow the community to participate in making a better future, they will feel more connected to the project and help prioritize the most demanded coins.

Overall, I think you're moving in the right direction and don't need to thanks, team I was contributing and reading some posts and made a reply.

Yep, this can be the best solution, they can set the minimum fee for BTC deals in BTC not in percentage.

Sad kad si to ovako napisao, palo mi je na pamet da stvarno pravi walleti (koji su stvarno samo walleti) vjerojatno neće imati problema. Za sam wallet vjerojatno ne treba nikakva dozvola. Ali problem je što većina popularnih walleta ima swap mogućnost. Evo, ja na mobitelu imam Metamask, Rabby, Xverse... Svi oni imaju swap mogućnost. Ne znam na koji način radi taj swap jer ga nikad nisam koristio, ali moguće da će walleti morati izbaciti tu funkciju ako ne žele da ih Google izbaci iz Play Store.

As I mentioned earlier, the exchange rates, as well asthe minimum and maximum exchange amounts, may change on an ongoing basis
depending on the current market situation. We strive to provide an individualapproach to each client and will be happy to confirm all the terms in the chat on our website with anyone interested.

Best regards,
The CryptoZeus Team

That's what the Price Margin percentage is for.

I was eager to know an alternative to Bitcointalk when I was new here. I was having this strange feelings that Bitcointalk could be taken down by the government and we wouldn't have an alternative. I was thinking Reddit was much higher in activity and engagement than Bitcointalk, but till now I don't know their statuses. I made an account on Reddit but I am no longer active there. Bitcointalk seems to be the perfect forum for me and since I belong here and understood that this forum is going no where for the mean time, I am very relaxed and in love with BTT

Thank you for your feedback!

For our clients, the top priority is fast andreliable exchanges without delays, and we are pleased to ensure this condition
is met. We will definitely take your suggestions into account and continueworking on improving our service in all areas.

We use exclusively our own funds. All
transactions — both incoming and outgoing — undergo verification, whichguarantees transparency and security when working with our service.

Thank you for helping us become better!

Best regards,
The CryptoZeus Team.

Even if that exchange keeps logs, they won't immediately send all logs of every user to all exchanges in the world. That is just ridiculous...

When you convert eXch coins to USDT or whatever, you can safely send those USDT to any other CEX you want without any worries...

are you sure it's not because you are a reseller using a 3rd party liquidity provider and you need higher minimum order amounts to make a nice fat profit on each exchange?

exactly, if they can ask users for KYC/AML information, their users also have a right to know who they are, where they are incorporated, and whether they have a license or not.

isn't that already the reality? and it's actually only getting worse as time goes on.

looking back, one of the best things i did was delete my binance account when KYC became mandatory a few years ago.
thanks to that, i forced myself to completely disconnect from all that KYC/AML bullshit and learn where and how to exchange my coins more privately and securely.

that's true, but i think he was referring to the swaps @examplens did on splash.tf (assuming they keep zero logs).

XMR isn't available on many CEXs, and this leads to the only option being to use DEXs or instant exchanges for conversion. That is the reason exchanges raise the XMR trading fee as they know that the trader do not have much options. I didn't like the fact when eXch increased the XMR fee to 5%. That was too much fee to pay for conversion. If any instant exchange wants to become popular, they should charge lower fees and rates close to the centralized exchanges, and they will get many customers. 

Time has come for yet another brief monthly overview, and this time a little bit earlier than usual as I am travelling tomorrow and won't be too active till Sunday. All charts and tables are made using Ddmrddmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space while images are uploaded via TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk made by @joker_josue.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but I included them anyway, hoping that theymos will finally give them their own local boards.

---

Post activity per local board during July 2025

During July, 13735 posts were written across local boards which is a solid increase compared to June (12762). Nigerian board not only kept the first spot they took from Russian board, but even increased the difference reaching their all time high of 3430 posts, while all the other boards afe far behind top two.

Regarding the boards that had decreased activity, French sticks out as their post number dropped by 50%, making it all time low (at leasts since I am making these overviews).

---

Active members per local board during July 2025

During the above mentioned period, 1348 members frote at least 1 post in one of the local borads, which is a big increase compared to June (1191). Majorify of this increase goes to Nigerian and Russian local boards, but other big boards contributed to that as well.

Also, its worth mentioning that Nigerian board is coming dangerously close to Russians and might overtake them in this metric as well.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during July 2025

When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Greek board is the leader with 71%, while in the same bracket Pakistan had only 11 % of such members.

In the 2-9 posts bracket, Bengali is at the top with 52% of such members, while Croatian local board had only 14% of members who wrote that amount of posts.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Pakistan leads with 53% while at the same time French local; board had only 8% of such members.

---

Merit shared per local board during July 2025

During July 8367 merit was sent across local boards that are part of this overview, which is surprisngly lower than during June (8710), despite two most merited boards having increased amount of merit shared. This decrease happened simply bnecause German board went from 1603 merit shared in june to only 604 in July, casuing this dump.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during July 2025

During July, average merit per post ratio across local boards was 0.61 which is a drop compared to June (0.68). No surprise there since number of post went up while merit went down.

While in june 4 local boards had over 1 merit/post ratio, this time only Spanish local boartd managed to reach that.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during July 2025

During July 534 members sent while 641 rereived merit on one of the local boards which is surprisingly an increased compared to June (529 senders/613 reicevers). I say surprisngly since merit shared went down noticeable, but maybe the fact that majorioty of that decrease happened on 1 board didn't affect the total numbers.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during July 2025

Once again Romanian local bpoard is at the top, but this time with a little bit more realistic 55% of merited posts (compared to June's 73%).

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during July 2025

And last in this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habits in local boards, which you can see differentiate quite a bit.

---

The most active members per local board during July 2025

And in the end, list of the most acrive members per local board. joker_josue from Portuguese local board is once again at the top with 168 posts, while two members from Russian board ( Julien_Olynpic with 158 and klarki with 155 posts) are 2nd and 3rd. GG guys!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Julien_Olynpic [158]	|	1. Lakai01 [118]	|	1. mandown [103]	|	1. Ale88 [80]	|	1. joker_josue [168]	|	1. famososMuertos [80]	|
2. klarki [155]	|	2. MaxMueller [105]	|	2. execijutiere [75]	|	2. xenomorfo [64]	|	2. bitmover [117]	|	2. darxiaomi [77]	|
3. jokers10 [124]	|	3. Soonandwaite [69]	|	3. Mustang Shelby [61]	|	3. giorgione [63]	|	3. sabotag3x [94]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [50]	|
4. zasad@ [100]	|	4. Koal-84 [60]	|	4. Wake Up [56]	|	4. babo [57]	|	4. TryNinja [89]	|	4. Hispo [37]	|
5. Numeral [93]	|	5. MinoRaiola [60]	|	5. ajanwalker [50]	|	5. verdinio [51]	|	5. alegotardo [78]	|	5. Porfirii [30]	|
6. xandry [91]	|	6. mole0815 [56]	|	6. blomen [49]	|	6. cande86 [50]	|	6. mikel_012 [46]	|	6. danadc [22]	|
7. safar1980 [76]	|	7. willi9974 [53]	|	7. Balmain [48]	|	7. fillippone [50]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [42]	|	7. MJWALK [12]	|
8. Alex077 [63]	|	8. Real-Duke [48]	|	8. Silence Scream [47]	|	8. *Ace* [49]	|	8. alexrossi [25]	|	8. MaksymMur [12]	|
9. Polkeins [59]	|	9. cygan [45]	|	9. W Jr. [47]	|	9. Plutosky [40]	|	9. l3pox [25]	|	9. Filicius [10]	|
10. Etranger [51]	|	10. Unknown01 [44]	|	10. Black Mbaye [44]	|	10. Lillominato89 [39]	|	10. criptoevangelista [24]	|	10. Pinkman737 [8]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [50]	|	1. Danydee [11]	|	1. Peanutswar [45]	|	1. katanic97 [43]	|	1. Charles-Tim [98]	|	1. Kavelj22 [36]	|
2. mu_enrico [33]	|	2. G.Seed [10]	|	2. blockman [42]	|	2. ovcijisir [43]	|	2. Yablee0 [58]	|	2. khaled0111 [29]	|
3. Luzin [28]	|	3. Becassine [9]	|	3. gunhell16 [41]	|	3. Pmalek [37]	|	3. Tonimez [45]	|	3. yhiaali3 [28]	|
4. joniboini [26]	|	4. patrickus [9]	|	4. cryptoaddictchie [32]	|	4. slackovic [37]	|	4. WhoYouCantKill [45]	|	4. GxSTxV [16]	|
5. maydna [23]	|	5. MJWALK [8]	|	5. GreatArkansas [30]	|	5. Rikafip [29]	|	5. Africolo [40]	|	5. loveurself420 [16]	|
6. armanda90 [21]	|	6. LeGaulois [7]	|	6. Eternad [26]	|	6. dkbit98 [27]	|	6. Floxynice [39]	|	6. MJWALK [13]	|
7. punk.zink [19]	|	7. Jer0mFR [5]	|	7. happybitcoinph [26]	|	7. examplens [22]	|	7. Tungbulu [38]	|	7. albon [12]	|
8. reagansimms [19]	|	8. Deelan1 [4]	|	8. arwin100 [25]	|	8. Trofo [16]	|	8. JayJuanGee [34]	|	8. Sebastian Michaelis [5]	|
9. silpersurfer [17]	|	9. Halab [4]	|	9. bhadz [25]	|	9. btcltcdigger [13]	|	9. Mate2237 [34]	|	9. OmegaStarScream [4]	|
10. masulum [16]	|	10. GrosWesh [3]	|	10. Fredomago [24]	|	10. BitGoba [10]	|	10. Fiatless [32]	|	10. hugeblack [4]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [15]	|	1. JSRAW [26]	|	1. condoras [19]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [21]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [64]	|	1. Crypto Library [18]	|
2. pawel7777 [8]	|	2. Bitcoin Smith [20]	|	2. Ultegra134 [18]	|	2. MJWALK [5]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [40]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [17]	|
3. MJWALK [2]	|	3. pawanjain [18]	|	3. CHSUP [1]	|	3. NeuroticFish [4]	|	3. Cheema02 [28]	|	3. Mahiyammahi [17]	|
4. TryNinja [2]	|	4. IIrik11 [16]	|	4. Dimitris [1]	|	4. TryNinja [2]	|	4. ZAINmalik75 [28]	|	4. Bd officer [13]	|
5. stwenhao [2]	|	5. TheUltraElite [12]	|	5. MJWALK [1]	|	5. @Whale [1]	|	5. MusaPk [25]	|	5. Z_MBFM [10]	|
6. CHSUP [1]	|	6. LucyFurr [8]	|	6. alani123 [1]	|	6. CHSUP [1]	|	6. BTC FutureKing [22]	|	6. Nothingtodo [9]	|
7. EXMON [1]	|	7. libert19 [8]	|	7. changlee [1]	|	7. Trêvoid [1]	|	7. Zaka1221 [21]	|	7. Review Master [7]	|
8. GazetaBitcoin [1]	|	8. avikz [6]	|		|	8. killat [1]	|	8. GbitG [20]	|	8. LDL [6]	|
9. TooBit.com [1]	|	9. GrennEC [5]	|		|		|	9. UmerIdrees [19]	|	9. Shishir99 [6]	|
10. Trêvoid [1]	|	10. mardo89 [4]	|		|		|	10. CryptoYar [18]	|	10. Wonder Work [5]	|

When you swap coins to coins from another chain, any link is immediately broken.

There is no reason to worry.

In my experience, i can say trading under 0.5 BTC on Binance is usually low risk, and the worst outcome is they might pause withdrawals. For amounts over 0.5 BTC, Binance runs stricter checks and might require additional verification or account reviews.

Our currency support table is dynamic and refreshes every few minutes. If FF isn't shown as supporting LN then it's because they briefly disabled it

They have by far the worst affiliate program as far as we're concerned, because they have the lowest fees. However, they are a favourite for most people.

On that note, I wish more services had LN. eXch was a very attractive alternative to FF, because they had LN and just as low fees, while having no KYC.

Good suggestion. I'll make sure we clarify it. And no, only if a never-KYC service demands KYC from you will we cover.

Tottenham have performed well against Manchester City since 2021/22 when playing at the Etihad, they have W3 D1 L1 record. Here are the statistics for their 21 meetings:

Aug 23, 2025: Man City 0-2 Spurs (Premier League)
Feb 26, 2025: Spurs 0-1 Man City (Premier League)
Nov 23, 2024: Man City 0-4 Spurs (Premier League)
Oct 30, 2024: Spurs 2-1 Man City (EFL Cup Last 16)
May 14, 2024: Spurs 0-2 Man City (Premier League)
Jan 26, 2024: Spurs 0-1 Man City (FA Cup Fourth Round)
Dec 03, 2023: Man City 3-3 Spurs (Premier League)
Feb 05, 2023: Spurs 1-0 Man City (Premier League)
Jan 19, 2023: Man City 4-2 Spurs (Premier League)
Feb 19, 2022: Man City 2-3 Spurs (Premier League)
Aug 15, 2021: Spurs 1-0 Man City (Premier League)
Apr 25, 2021: Man City 1-0 Spurs (EFL Cup Final)
Feb 13, 2021: Man City 3-0 Spurs (Premier League)
Nov 21, 2020: Spurs 2-0 Man City (Premier League)
Feb 02, 2020: Spurs 2-0 Man City (Premier League)
Aug 17, 2019: Man City 2-2 Spurs (Premier League)
Apr 20, 2019: Man City 1-0 Spurs (Premier League)
Apr 17, 2019: Man City 4-3 Spurs (Champions League Quarter-Finals)
Apr 09, 2019: Spurs 1-0 Man City (Champions League Quarter-Finals)
Oct 29, 2018: Spurs 0-1 Man City (Premier League)
Apr 14, 2018: Spurs 1-3 Man City (Premier League)

Part of the problem is that Manchester City are no longer the attacking force and defensive wall that they used to be. When Rodri was injured last season it exposed how vulnerable Manchester City really were.

They had plenty of players coming and going but many were not ideal replacements. Grealish at £100 million was a failure, Mahrez in 2023 and Sane in 2020 were never replaced with similar players. They knew De Bruyne was heading for an exit yet did not bring in someone to fill his role.

Buying Haaland clearly worked for them but overall their recruitment has just been good when it should have been excellent if they want to win the Premier League and Champions League again.

Zanimljiv princip. Naravno da i dalje imam pitanja Na primjer, kako odlučiš kad ćeš stop loss staviti u zeleno? Nakon što cijena pređe neki resistance, nakon što procijeniš da je cijena dovoljno narasla da ne bi više smjela pasti ispod ulaza ili na neki treći način? Takav način trejdanja si naučio u onoj paid grupi? Rekao si da tamo imaju jako dobar content pa pretpostavljam da si tamo čuo za to.


Upravo tako. Ja na sve te loše odluke gledam kao na školu, a znamo da svaka škola košta Samo ovakvu školu ne plaćaš na način da potrošiš novac koji već imaš nego izgubiš dio zarade koju si mogao imati.

This happened to me as well, not too long ago. The exchange had no problem accepting funds from eXch before the Bybit incident but afterward its a whole nother story. There were 2 silly things about this:

1) I received the funds from eXch before the Bybit hack, they just sat there for over a year, but since the eXch Ethereum address is marked/blacklisted, any funds sent at any time from them are considered "illicit."

2) The exchange accepted the deposit and immediately moved the funds to their hot wallet, all the while accusing me of having tainted funds. I pointed out to them that now their address was tainted as well. But it doesn't work like that I guess, as illicit funds received by a regulated exchange are now clean again (so long as they didn't come from a hacked exchange).

So they did end up issuing me a refund as well. They told me to be more cautious in the future, and I just accept it -- what's the point of arguing with them.

This happens because I am also victim of same situation have too many expectations from Bayer Leverkusen but change of coach and exit of few top players having impact on them.
Today I lost my two free bets both on Bayer Leverkusen, Manchester City and last one Atlético Madrid which held by Elche at home what a shame full start for these top teams in this new season even they spend huge funds for keeping good results.
This week surprises like many big teams lost their games at home which are surely upset and lost of funds for many those were sure about these wins and expecting good return of their bets with these results look like Sunday is also going to be not easy for betting.

Superbru?

Death, taxes, Totteham beating Manchester city- different manager, same old result.

Not against personal growth, but Trafford has little to no premier experience to start games for City. He caused the second goal.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (51) 13468 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (0) 257 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 8533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2294 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3946 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2623 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9337 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4067 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2384 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3165 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2433 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 8216 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5620 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 7866 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 120837: vizique (Trust: +40 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 645 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1546 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1516 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 1743 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 303 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (8) 6276 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1806 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6379 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3023 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +19 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +142 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3079 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: #  +52 / =3 / -5) (DT1! (2) 1288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3853 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 10850 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 10769 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4427 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2100 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3823 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (59) 18552 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +33 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 6133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 507856: LeGaulois (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2770 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 740502: condoras (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 665 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1295 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3699 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 958 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 437 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1432 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3440 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1075 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3128 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6111 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +100 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3839 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1702 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +25 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 14458 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2010 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2915 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +75 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 10936 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1164 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1893 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 8713 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1289002: Maus0728 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1572 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2285 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2934 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3486 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3125 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 18825 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2630 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2361 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 4877 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 5050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1423 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 7440 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +36 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 2949 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1825 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 885 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 792 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1099 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 7168 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1477 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5765 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1059 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2746 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3373825: paid2 (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3705 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 638 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    97. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +4 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1246 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (7804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

They have made it so easy that they are freezing funds of their customers by giving such ridiculous reasons. Now the number of such exchanges is increasing at an alarming rate, we have seen many cases recently with the same pattern but their explanation is different.

This is a trend of harassing crypto users by trapping them in a web called KYC, they want all kinds of documents that make a crypto user's privacy disappear, which is really disappointing. They are again tagging that crypto user as an attacker even after holding back $11k of this user.

Wow, that's a huge differentiator, I hadn't noticed that. Congratulations to the folks at CCE.Cash. 

Through BTCPay server, you mean? Tesla accepted BTC payments through BTCPay, if I remember correctly. I agree with you, these folks need better guidance regarding BTC payments.

the current owner who states they have the coins have shown images of the coins to verify - also that user is the original purchaser of those coins.

@examplens
This has already been confirmed by current owner that satochipzz doesn't owns these two coins
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5556249.msg65719405#msg65719405

I am 99,99% sure that this is absolutely true because the original owner has created and announced to own this coins few years ago.
He has never claimed to have sold these coin and now he is claiming to have still in possession.
Of course you can assume these are loaded if hologram has not been peeled... that's why these objects must be traded with a lot of attention due many issues that can arise.

Thanks for mentioning us @bitmover.

Previously, we did swap coins from eXch (ETH and BTC) without any issues.

Sure  , I haven't tested this service yet. Certainly looks a good option

You can also ask for Trêvoid, he has a  p2p service  which will accept coins from eXch.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0

Ima istine u tome,bio sam dobio tek kad sam se opet vratio na forum  na bc.game-u $50 freebet-a i morao sam da izvrtim duplo,secam se da sam odigrao neka tri para na tiketu i utrostrucim dobitak   Tako da sam pola bio povukao,pola ostavio na racunu. Naravno to je bila sreca,ne znam da li bih mogao ponoviti to opet ...

Free bets zna biti dvosjekli mac, za razliku od obicne nagrade u casinu u USDT-u. Nekad cak udvostrucim nagradu, ali se zna dogoditi i da je skroz izgubim losom okladom. Vjerujem okak tko se bolje razumije u sport da bi mogao i visestruko profitirati. "Obicnu" casino nagradu cesto izvrtim na dice ili ruletu (kladim se na crveno-crno) da ispunim wagering, a sredstva nakon wagering-a  budu i manja od dobivene nagrade.

Examplens probaj promijeniti "sretne brojeve". Ako se cesto prijavljujes sa istim brojevima, mozda je u tome problem

Is that annecdotal or did you engage with him to find out?

Just curious.

Nije forsiranje, nego izgleda da su odlucili potrositi nesto novaca u promociju na forumu pa imaju najvise nagradnih igara Prije Nekoliko mjeseci prvaci u nagradnim igrama su bili BC.game ali izgleda da su malo smanjili lovu za marketing, barem sto se foruma tice. Kod nijih sam znao osvojiti isto lijepe nagrade, mislim u ukupnoj vrijednosti preko 100 USD. Ali i Whale nije los, mislim da sam vec 3 puta free betove dobio tamo

[quote author=albon link=topic=5556124.msg65717425#msg65717425 l.

In addition, I think updating the topic created by @examplens would be better than maintaining two separate threads, so we can keep a single reference point for everyone to return to instead of having too many active topics.
[/quote]
Thanks. You are correct, and fraudsters go to different domains and repeat the same tricks, most of the time using WhatsApp or Telegram. I did this thread to encourage new people to keep abreast of new examples rather than to be repetitive. I concur that it is best to maintain in one location, and I am open to contributor to this post or the original thread to make it more useful to the general population.

I have used my coins exch in those exchanges . I always send money in small batches

Swapuz.com (they accepeted some coins, then refunded me without kyc agter a few batches)
Cce.cash
Hyperliquid.

All of the domains that were reported seem to have gone down by now,, but it’s likely that the scammers will create more new domains, promising investors high, guaranteed profits through so-called cloud mining. Once one of their schemes succeeds, they usually move on to a new domain under a different name.

I hope people don't trust those who first contacts them on social media or apps like WhatsApp, Telegram, or Discord, trying to lure them with promises of big profits. Don't trust, but verify. Don't rush to deposit your money. Do your own research and I strongly advise everyone to avoid new websites that have no track record or reviews.

In addition, I think updating the topic created by @examplens would be better than maintaining two separate threads, so we can keep a single reference point for everyone to return to instead of having too many active topics.

Apology, brother, I am aware of your list, but I forgot to mention that we already have one, created 6 years ago. It’s probably one of the oldest and longest scam lists. If OP wants to make his own, he can do so.
These lists are informative to help investors be made aware of how these scammer works.