Last update: 2025-09-17_Wed_06.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 65814895 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 06:03:01 CEST 2025) in SnapSwap.io | Instant Crypto Exchange | Swap BTC, ETH, XMR, and more without KYC:
It is questionable whether the mentioned deposit also covers the case when the partner freezes the money. As a potential user, I will not be interested in who in the chain holds the order, I would just like my money back.
Conversely, more liquidity providers means better exchange rates and lower transfer fees.
Personally, I don't mind paying higher fees (1% to 2%) if there's a simple service that ensures funds aren't frozen. This can be easily implemented by creating a small reserve and resolving issues with the liquidity provider, rather than requiring you to contact the liquidity provider's support team.
In general, I don't think services would risk creating such a service, so clarifying the liquidity provider would be a good step.
2. Post 65813481 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 19:12:13 CEST 2025) in 🔄 Changeum.io - Lightning-Fast Instant Crypto Exchange | No KYC:
OK, I see some illogicalities here, so if possible, an explanation.
Good points.
I am impressed by the number of new swap services showing up after exch was seized.
Looks like there are many small services trying to fill the gap they left .. unfortunately, it takes time to build the trust we had in their service, which was truly kyc free
3. Post 65813116 (unedited backup) (by Findingnemo) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 17:32:44 CEST 2025) in Dirty bitcoin risk?:
~
Also, don't forget that the 'dirtiest' coins become clean after they are confiscated by the authorities.
They can twist it as they want and this is another proof of how fucked up the system is, they consider something illegal but they also sell/auction them to make money out of it. Privacy and freedom is basic rights of every user and Bitcoin offers that with these tools and intention of laundering money using these privacy tools comes from the user not from the product/service so labeling the product is just the wrong way of handling it.
4. Post 65811675 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 08:51:55 CEST 2025) in [VELIKA LISTA] Hardverski novčanici (80+):
Pri tom, ova kartica je iskljucivo kolekcionarski primerak, ne bih rekao da vredi takvog rizika.
Kolekcionari vole i skupljaju različite stvari. Meni npr nisu nimalo privlačni časopisi stari po 10 godina u kojima ima neki članak ili je naslovna strana posvećena Bitcoinu. A opet, ima dosta ljudi koji to vole i skupljaju. Takvi predmeti imaju svoje tržište i svoje kupce. Ako se proizvede mali broj ovih Whale.io kartica, možda nekad u budućnosti postanu tražena roba samo zato što ih nema puno.
5. Post 65808631 (unedited backup) (by apogio) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 12:36:07 CEST 2025) in [DONATIONS] by apogio:
This is a wonderful initiative. If you have any ideas on how to select these members (especially those who don't wear paid signatures), we'd be happy to help.
If you rephrase it more specifically, we might be able to convince the administration to support it with a fixed monthly amount.
Hey hugeblack, sorry I didn't understand what you mean with the administration support. Thanks for the kind words though!
+1 for this
These 'small' tools certainly make it easier for us to use the forum, and their creators deserve more attention. They all invested some of their time and money in development. I assume that a donation to them would definitely encourage them to continue and give them a sign that they are doing a good thing.
I saw in the past a few good ideas, but they were not implemented due to a lack of funds.
I applaud apogio's initiative, this is just my two cents.
The users who have implemented these tools will definitely receive donations from me in the future! I don't have a specific schedule for my payments; I'll be donating at random times, when I have the ability to do so. That's exactly the meaning of a donation.
Thanks for the applause!
6. Post 65808387 (unedited backup) (by OrangeFren) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 11:11:01 CEST 2025) in OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison:
Has anyone tried to use Octoswap recently?
Last few times when I did search on Orangefren for swapping USDT to BTC, Octoswap has been shown as exchange with best exchange rate. When I visited Octoswap I was surprised how good exchange rate really was
Too bad that it didn't work. This issue is going on for few weeks, as I tried to swap smaller amounts of USDT to BTC, and it wasn't fixed so I couldn't make the swap. Haven't tried other pairs though, just USDT (BEP20) -> BTC.
Thanks for the report. I think the issue is our accurate on very small swaps isn't great. We'll make sure OctoSwap start reporting the min swap sizes to us so we can avoid these issues.
That's one "feature" I really dislike! The notion of "taint" is completely arbitrary, so they can selectively apply it. But also, they're basically saying they'll take dirty criminal coins as long as they get a higher fee.
I wonder how they manage 'tainted' coins, exchangers who use third-party liquidity partners. Obviously, they found a way to prevent LP from freezing their funds. Do they share that extra fee among themselves?
I can't speak for OctoSwap specifically, but generally what I've heard services do with tainted coins is they sell them on DEXes. This is one of the reasons why using P2P DEXes is very dangerous as you're likely to end up with extremely tainted coins.
7. Post 65808005 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 08:44:08 CEST 2025) in 8. Rujan 2025: NPM Supply-Chain Attack koji srećom nije uspio:
Ovo sam video na nekoj grupi, gde se korisnik zali da je trenutno izgubio pristup Ledger nano walletu. Nekako se desilo u vreme ovog hacka. Ipak, Ledger je u pitanju, pa nista nije iznenadjujuce.
Mislim da su to dva skroz različita slučaja. Kiln je jedan od partner servisa unutar Ledger Live aplikacije. To je neka DeFi i staking platforma. A poštu su partner Ledgeru, onda se staking može direktno sa hardverskog novčanika vršiti. Kiln je prije par dana objavio da su imali neki sigurnosni propust i vjerovatno su hakirani. Kako obično u takvim situacijama biva, prekida se rad platforme dok se situacija ne riješi.
Taj koji tvrdi da je izgubio pristup svom Ledgeru postavio je sliku s Ledger Live aplikacije gdje se vidi obavještenje u vezi Kiln.
8. Post 65807940 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 08:12:32 CEST 2025) in Altcoin novosti:
Jel mozes ovo da uprostis za nas koji nismo toliko vicni altcoinima, sta je ovde neka sustinska stvar, zbog koje bi vredelo ulaziti u celu pricu? Osim potencijalnog airdropa, koji moze a i ne mora da opali.
To je u sustini opcija za automatsko trgovanje, jel to pravi nekakav profit ili se sve svodi na broj poena koje ces skupiti?
Ne ulažeš u projekt nego svoj kripto stavljaš u pametni ugovor koji onda temeljem pravila koje postaviš trejda za tebe. Što se tiče airdropa, to zaboravi. Istina je da zbog nečega postoje bodovi ali u zadnjih par godina je bolje ne računati na nikakvu zaradu od airdropa. Ja sam stavio unutra lovu za koju sam spreman riskirati pa sam odabrao da mi s 50% ETH-a koji sam stavio unutra trguje s nekakvim shitarama koje su trending po Dexscreeneru. Naravno da možeš ostati s hrpom mrtvih tokena (kako je cryptofrka napisao) ali sve ovisi o tome kako ćeš postaviti pravila. Nema minimalnog iznosa koji možeš staviti pa ako te zanima, javi se za ref (jer za sad ne možeš ući bez koda) pa ubaci unutra 10-20 dolara i vidi. Tako sam ja krenuo.
Uložio sam već u jedan takav, zaboravio sam mu ime. Na Arbitrumu je bio čini mi se, imam pun wallet nekih dead shitara zbog toga
U teoriji mi se to čini kao ok ideja, ako nemaš fiksan broj referrala i nije ti bitno hoće li se netko prijaviti ili ne pošalji mi - pa ću detaljnije pogledati kad ulovim malo vremena.
Kuha nam se altseason - moglo bi biti dobro vrijeme za ovako nešto.
Kako sam napisao gore, naravno da je moguće da ti ostane pun wallet mrtvih tokena. Ali sve ovisi kako postaviš strategiju trejdanja. Ako postaviš da ti cijelo vrijeme drži 50% ETH i 50% wBTC (gleda se u odnosu na fiat vrijednost), onda nećeš imati shitare.
Mene više muči to što kripto nije u mom walletu pa uvijek postoji mogućnost nekog hacka. Ali opet je bolje ovako nego da pametnom ugovoru moram dati dozvolu da radi transakcije s mog walleta.
9. Post 65807205 (unedited backup) (by zasad@) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 00:23:19 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
I have a suggestion:
My idea is not to limit the number of participants.
For example, you set a deadline for submitting applications and the participants do not choose a number.
A participant submits an application and after the deadline for submitting applications, you assign each participant a number in the order of submitting the application. If a participant has the right to 2 applications, you give him 2 numbers.
As a result, more participants will be able to participate in the competition, learn about the project, and will not waste all their time looking for available numbers.
This sounds like more work for the organizer, and it is more susceptible to the interpretation that one of the participants is being favored. In the end, it is one of the more attractive raffles, and all places are filled very quickly.
I wouldn't touch anything there, except maybe if they were more frequent.
And I am sure that it requires less effort, you don't need to constantly monitor the topic. For example, today the organizer announced a competition and in 3 days distributed numbers to all participants.
Numbers can be distributed according to any algorithm, for example, the last post is 73, which means that numbers will be distributed starting with 7+3: 10 9 8.. 1 11 12 13..72 You can come up with any algorithm so that the participant does not try to pick a number for himself.
10. Post 65807173 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Mon Sep 15 00:13:07 CEST 2025) in Test:
Friendly bump here. This unfairly went as far as page 5.
btw. TryNinja, what do you think about adding a timer, information on the duration, in addition to the online/offline indicator? It's not so important for 'online', but now I see that many services from all sections are currently offline, so it would be useful to know if this is a temporary problem or if it will last for a long time.
Also, after how much time of inactivity is the service removed from monitoring?
Thanks for the bump.
I was already planning to make a historical chart that shows how often and for how long a service is down for. That will go with the service overview page which shows more information about the website, like known mirror urls and social media links.
11. Post 65807001 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 23:15:37 CEST 2025) in [VELIKA LISTA] Hardverski novčanici (80+):
Nisam hteo ovo da stavljam u G&R sekciju,nekako mi je vise za ovu temu jer sama nagrada vuce na to. Uglavnom, Whale organizuje tombolu u kojoj pobednik dobija Cold wallet u obliku kartice,ciji se privatni kljuc nalazi ispod holograma. Pa ako neko zeli,informacije za prijavljivanje su na linku,ima jos dostupnih mesta.
[FREE RAFFLE] 🐳 Whale.io Custom Card 🔥 Round 3Tu je problem sto se mora dati fizicka adresa u nekom trenutku, jer nekako moras dobiti nagradu. Pretpostavka da se radi o pouzdanim osobama koje to salju, ali ipak znacajno narusava privatnost. A cesto vidimo da bas zbog nekog banalnog previda izadju javno neki podaci. Pre pola godine, onaj exch prevarant je nudio novac za licne informacije o meni i jos par clanova sa foruma. To je tastatura ratnik, ali zasto bi mi trebalo da razmisljam, hocu li se natezati sa nekim online.
Pri tom, ova kartica je iskljucivo kolekcionarski primerak, ne bih rekao da vredi takvog rizika.
Je l to onaj lik sto je na kraju bio otkriven? Mislim da su izasle njegove slike,njega i zene,tako nesto,mada nebitno. Svakako si u pravu za rizik kada se daje fizicka adresa. Vidim vec runda 3 pa aj kao,nije bilo problema sa proslim,pa da postavim,mozda neko zeli kolekcionarski primerak
12. Post 65806488 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 20:37:13 CEST 2025) in OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison:
That's one "feature" I really dislike! The notion of "taint" is completely arbitrary, so they can selectively apply it. But also, they're basically saying they'll take dirty criminal coins as long as they get a higher fee.
I wonder how they manage 'tainted' coins, exchangers who use third-party liquidity partners. Obviously, they found a way to prevent LP from freezing their funds. Do they share that extra fee among themselves?
Personally I wouldn't be surprised if they just ran that money through one of the mixers and meanwhile complete your exchange using clean coins they have in reserve. That would explain why they charge higher rates.
Well I guess that's the least we can expect when you can pass money through Brian Armstrong or the DoJ twins and it suddenly becomes clean again.
13. Post 65806077 (unedited backup) (by nestex_one) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 19:02:49 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
You didn't give a direct answer. Do you keep VerdOrrBT money or not?
The account is locked,
we have not removed any funds from it. The user has been given a method (which their representative in our discord agreed was quite okay).
Once it's resolved, their access will be fully restored.
This argument you are having with him here is childish and shows amateurism. I'm not sure how much it helps in building trust with other users.
So the way I see it there's 3 options: blindly trust them, or ignore them, or respond to them. I can't do the 1st option as that's not really available for me. Option #2 - ignoring them - is not a good thing anyways; I would hate it if I were ignored.
So naturally I need to respond. You do say the argument is childish but you will notice I've tried to remain as civil as possible throughout and support restoration of the user's account based on the one static condition that was mentioned to them.
If this doesn't make sense, feel free to tell me a 4th option that I might not have considered. I'm happy to take inputs and implement them.
And, don't (both of you) quote me in each of your posts, it's tiring to get notifications with your repetitive sentences.
Sure mate, will not include you in future replies; just this one msg where I'm replying directly to you
14. Post 65805767 (unedited backup) (by hosemary) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 17:40:55 CEST 2025) in Another surprisingly thing on blockchain.com:
I haven't used a blockchain.com wallet in a long time, probably the last time when they were still on .info. Did they switch to custodial?
Blockchain.com wallet is still non-custodial. It gives you a BIP39 seed phrase and you can have access to your wallet using other softwares.
In the post you quoted, I was referring to the blockchain.com exchange, not their wallet.
If you want to use their exchange, you have to verify your identity and (like many other exchanges) give the control of your funds to a third party.
15. Post 65804311 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 09:09:13 CEST 2025) in 8. Rujan 2025: NPM Supply-Chain Attack koji srećom nije uspio:
Vecina velikih hakova se desilo nakon sto je neka bitna sifra ukradena. Dakle, svi sigurnosni protokoli, razni layeri a gotovo uvek je najslabija tacka covek i makar i kratka nesmotrenost.
Tako je. Bez obzira što neki sustav po prirodi može biti trustless, kakav je Bitcoin, u pozadini su developeri i ljudi koji održavaju i unaprjeđuju cijelu stvar. Kao korisnik, ti i dalje zavisiš od njih. Čak i ako oni imaju najbolje namjere, može se desiti isto ili slično što se desilo qix-u. Neko dobije pristup projektima koje održava i zloupotrijebi to.
Ovdje je nekoliko faktora uticalo na to da posljedice ne budu puno gore. Prije svega to što su ti JavaScript paketi open-source i mnogi su mogli proanalizirati šta se dešava. Jedan paket je javio build grešku što je potaklo druge developere da pogledaju šta nije uredu i šta je mijenjano. Većina softvera koji zavisi od tih JavaScript paketa nije povukla update. Moguće da su konfigurisani da to rade u određeno vrijeme što se nije poklapalo s periodom od 2 sata dok su promijenjeni paketi bili live.
16. Post 65803855 (unedited backup) (by nestex_one) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 04:49:07 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
Give me back MY coins.
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Let's clear up; funds of user @VerdOrrBT are blocked on your 'exchange'.
Fact. And this is not denied by the representative.
I already said yes in my response to examplens. And the reason has also been cited.
17. Post 65803848 (unedited backup) (by VerdOrrBT) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 04:46:07 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
Give me back MY coins.
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Let's clear up; funds of user @VerdOrrBT are blocked on your 'exchange'.
Fact. And this is not denied by the representative.
18. Post 65803755 (unedited backup) (by VerdOrrBT) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 03:35:07 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
Give me back MY coins.
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Your faith is quite uninteresting to the others. I honestly gave up reading after the second post.
Let's clear up; funds of user @VerdOrrBT are blocked on your 'exchange'. You did this because you dislike him and suspect he has some bad intentions. Did I miss something?
I dislike them now
Give me back MY coins and continue doing whatever you want
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Now everyone can see that your “terms of service” allow you to steal funds under a false pretext.
You are a scammer from known world-famous phishing operation! It's natural to keep you out of our systems.
Will there be evidence? Or did you steal my money because you felt like it?
Give me back MY coins and keep dreaming
The evidence was presented many times now! And also your desire to NOT disprove the charge!
Just scroll to previous pages or read the PDF that Liz emailed you, or read it up on NestEx discord bro, doesnt make sense to repeat it again 😂
As previously mentioned, present your evidence to Liz on email and at least ask how to disprove the charge, try to take some action there. Taking further action is in her hands now, not in mine.
Judging by the text and the way the system works, your entire team is hand-ass and ass-head. Just give me back MY coins and I won't tell anyone about this. But I can't promise that.
19. Post 65803733 (unedited backup) (by nestex_one) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 03:11:01 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
Give me back MY coins.
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Your faith is quite uninteresting to the others. I honestly gave up reading after the second post.
Let's clear up; funds of user @VerdOrrBT are blocked on your 'exchange'. You did this because you dislike him and suspect he has some bad intentions. Did I miss something?
I dislike them now
Give me back MY coins and continue doing whatever you want
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Now everyone can see that your “terms of service” allow you to steal funds under a false pretext.
You are a scammer from known world-famous phishing operation! It's natural to keep you out of our systems.
Will there be evidence? Or did you steal my money because you felt like it?
Give me back MY coins and keep dreaming
The evidence was presented many times now! And also your desire to NOT disprove the charge!
Just scroll to previous pages or read the PDF that Liz emailed you, or read it up on NestEx discord bro, doesnt make sense to repeat it again 😂
20. Post 65803728 (unedited backup) (by VerdOrrBT) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 03:07:25 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
Give me back MY coins.
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Your faith is quite uninteresting to the others. I honestly gave up reading after the second post.
Let's clear up; funds of user @VerdOrrBT are blocked on your 'exchange'. You did this because you dislike him and suspect he has some bad intentions. Did I miss something?
I dislike them now
Give me back MY coins and continue doing whatever you want
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Now everyone can see that your “terms of service” allow you to steal funds under a false pretext.
You are a scammer from known world-famous phishing operation! It's natural to keep you out of our systems.
Will there be evidence? Or did you steal my money because you felt like it?
Give me back MY coins and keep dreaming
21. Post 65803572 (unedited backup) (by nestex_one) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 01:14:25 CEST 2025) in NestEx (nestex.one) - scammers:
Give me back MY coins.
Sorry but our terms of service does not allow us to extend such courtesy to bad actors.
Your faith is quite uninteresting to the others. I honestly gave up reading after the second post.
Let's clear up; funds of user @VerdOrrBT are blocked on your 'exchange'. You did this because you dislike him and suspect he has some bad intentions. Did I miss something?
You're speaking of "dislike" however I personally did not interact with this user at all until a few days ago, and their account block as well as the notice sent to them were instituted by my reporting manager.
Our cybersecurity guys flagged the account and the rest is as you see.
I agree I dislike them now, but last month I didn't know them.
22. Post 65803203 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 23:05:19 CEST 2025) in [ALAT] Generator tablica - Prilagođene stilizirane tablice za Bitcointalk!:
Nesto mi je bilo prekomplikovano, na kraju sam se ipak drzao starog dobrog tekst editora i copy/paste koda. Hocu reci, nije mi bilo vredno listati dokumentaciju, testirati sve mogucnosti i razumevati kako je to kreator zamislio.
Ja sam takodjer bacio oko na ovaj tool (samo na par minuta doduse) i takodjer mi se cini komplicirano a nekako sam lijen da malo vise procackam.
Ja u zadnje vrijeme koristim Groka da mi napravi tablice za one moje mjesecne preglede lokalnih boardova, ali svako malo nesto zajebe. ChatGPT je jos gori bio po tom pitanju, vise puta sams e ozbiljno posvadjao sa njim zbog jebenih tablica.
23. Post 65802405 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 19:23:43 CEST 2025) in DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned):
Has it ever been discussed that banned users should be excluded from the possibility of DT selection?
Banned users can't post, so they can't reach DT1:
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
Banned users can no longer vote for other DT1-members:
Somebody PMed me pointing out an example of someone included in DT1 only because they were trusted by a permabanned member. I was aware that permabanned members were allowed to be voters, but I thought it'd be too rare to matter. But now I'm leaning toward excluding them.
I decided to exclude banned users
If someone is banned from the forum, therefore they are considered undesirable here, shouldn't they be completely excluded from any moderation here?
I'd say the rest is up to DT1-members: if a majority of DT1 thinks the feedback of a certain banned user is worth seeing, it's visible by default.
24. Post 65800882 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 12:24:02 CEST 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +33 / =1 / -1) (
DT1! (56) 13541 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 203:
HostFat (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 290 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 8701 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 30747:
Vod (
Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2311 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4031 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2629 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 9433 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 4221 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 2392 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 84521:
Welsh (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 3165 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 5693 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 113670:
Mitchell (
Trust: +49 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 1568 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1516 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 5740 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1789 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 153634:
dbshck (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 625 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 303 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (9) 6280 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 189967:
buckrogers (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2083 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 216582:
willi9974 (
Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2535 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 11820 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 5896 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 6237 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 6382 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 3050 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +20 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (25) 8946 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (28) 3872 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3396 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +36 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 10840 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 395806:
o_solo_miner (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 524 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4427 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2135 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 3885 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +30 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (56) 18767 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 487418:
The Sceptical Chymist (
Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (
DT1! (31) 6145 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 557798:
TryNinja (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 8122 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 740502:
condoras (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 673 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 754818:
holydarkness (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 1296 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 3701 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 811213:
polymerbit (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 958 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 439 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1437 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 3467 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1077 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1176 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 986781:
imhoneer (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (3) 1347 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6148 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +91 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 3856 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1709 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -1) (
DT1! (2) 1906 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4159 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 14602 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2058 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2962 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +74 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 10944 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1179651:
sheenshane (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1164 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2086 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1900 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 8755 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 2297 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1339716:
coinlocket$ (
Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 1511 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 2943 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 6899 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 11183 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1634314:
shahzadafzal (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 3164 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1668017:
anonymousminer (
Trust: +38 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 1309 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1724800:
Lakai01 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3513 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1825672:
morvillz7z (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2186 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3128 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 2602 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 2170 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2320 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1894120:
madnessteat (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2630 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 2366 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 5062 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 1428 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2143453:
1miau (
Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (19) 7442 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +38 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 2985 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (16) 1828 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 929 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 792 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2597426:
efialtis (
Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 1538 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 7208 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1646 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1479 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2744352:
bullrun2024bro (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 4999 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 5800 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1074 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2791 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (1) 638 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 3486361:
PowerGlove (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 6374 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3506304:
God Of Thunder (
Trust: +5 / =4 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1270 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (
7896 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
804 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
30 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
141 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3318:
Luke-Jr (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
190 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (
334 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 4528:
Matt Corallo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
17 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 10502:
SgtSpike (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 11275:
wariner (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 11671:
Kluge (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 12089:
piotr_n (
Trust: neutral) (
427 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 12459:
CydeWeys (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 13813:
smooth (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
198 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 14001:
MiningBuddy (
Trust: neutral)
(0 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. Post 65796599 (unedited backup) (by splashed) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 08:59:07 CEST 2025) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
There is one more thing ... I have problems with my eyesight and I think that anyone who wears glasses (I think there are many of them) experiences slight discomfort when trying to see input fields. Input fields should be slightly highlighted or marked with some mini lines that will help to catch the focus.
I agree with this, and I don't have any problems with my eyesight.
Maybe they could increase the size of text and reverse color for input fields, similar like it was on eXch website, that would make it easier to read.
If the decision is to keep showing 24h volume, the amounts should be limited to 8 decimal places.
btc 0.0045000000000000005 ?
I also have problems with my eyesight and wear glasses. When I visited the website for the first time, I was unable to find the input fields, but once I saw that, I couldn't undo it again. I would recommend them working on it as well.
Thank you all for the feedback, we'll work on it
Overall, I haven't seen any increase in reserves since day one, which is a negative indicator.
Yes, we are also working on this, it'll be increased soon
26. Post 65794454 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Thu Sep 11 17:06:49 CEST 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:
To sam i ja hteo pitati,nesto mi mnogo cudno da mnogo malo kampanja ima u poslednje vreme. BetFury je trajao dugo i kao pauziran ja sve mislio uskoro ce opet se aktivirati al izgleda nista…
Ja mislim da trenutno nikad teze i gore nije bilo uci u kampanju,bukvalno sve kampanje su pune a novih nema uopste.
Kako ništa? Pa BetFury kampanja je krenula ponovo prije par tjedana. Odnosno nije krenula iznova nego se nastavila, ali se trebalo opet prijaviti ako se dobro sjećam. Mislim sa smo iz našeg lokala upali dkbit98 i ja.
Nisam primetio sve sam gledao jednom u dve nedelje i ocekivao da ce biti neki tag ili pm al izgleda da sam uspeo da propustim to. Ne znam ova kampanja mi je bila mnogo dobro ali koliko sada vidim bas malo ljudi ima u njoj ili se ja varam
Ovde sam bio stavio da je kampanja otvorena znaci 29. jula je pocela sa radom opet,nakon sto je bila pauizrana,i ovde mozes naci pitanje i odgovor za tu kampanju gde je Pmalek odgovorio na pitanje examplens-u.Redovno sam tagovao ljude koji nisu imali tada kampanju da bi se mogli prijaviti sto pre,dosta ljudi je i uspelo da udje u kampanje. Nisam te vidjao ovde na lokalu,tako da nisam mogao ni da znam. Pretpostavljam da si bez kampanje,kada bude nesto novo ili ako bude negde otvoreno mesto,tagovacu te sto pre budem mogao. Svakako se slazem sa onim sto si rekao da era kampanji polako umire
Malo sam bio odsutan zadnja dva dana, sada prmecujem da neki od vas vise nisu u BetFurry kampanji. Sta se tamo desilo?
Koliko se secam, to je trebala biti bas dugorocna kampanja, sredstva za minimum 1+ god obezbedjena. Bar je meni tako menadzer rekao prilikom poziva da se prikljucim.
Kampanja je trenutno pauzirana. Da li samo na nekoliko dana ili cijeli ovaj tjedan ostaje da se vidi. Ja mislim da će se nastaviti ali će biti promjena. Vjerovatno Betfury i menadžer razmatraju dosadašnje rezultate i učinkovitost kampanje pa će onda odlučiti kako nastaviti. Moguće da će se smanjiti broj učesnika a možda snizi i tjedna isplate ali će onda za rezultat imati to da će oni najbolji početi tražiti bolje plaćene kampanje.
27. Post 65790777 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 16:34:25 CEST 2025) in [Warning] Unnamed.exchange - do we have another exit scam?:
There has been enough information posted online that points to Tillkoeln and how to take him to court. If the member was serious about wanting to join any lawsuit, the forum was not the only way of announcing it. He could have used his initiative in other ways too but either way I wish any victims success if they try to take scammer Tillkoeln to court.
Hey, im from the EU and im willing to join the lawsuit.
Im not hoping of getting any money back, but Tillkoeln belongs to the jail.
Look at some of the previous posts, some of the members were also planning it, or maybe they have already done it. Some of them also have the personal data of this scammer, which makes it easier to file a report.
I'm not doxxing anyone here because it's against the rules, even if it's about scammers.
28. Post 65789624 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 10:09:07 CEST 2025) in splash.tf - instant exchange BTC / ETH / XMR / DAI:
It may not be an eXch clone, but it certainly has some good things that were a feature of eXch. They must add more funds to the reserves and start with a little more noisy promotion. I see them as a potential successor to eXch.
Yes, all praise for the update. I had a problem with RBF on one order, but they obviously reacted very quickly and fixed the issue.
I get your point. They may have the most features that eXch offered, yet I don't think we should call them a clone of eXch. The word "Clone" defines something else. Many platforms may have similar features, but that doesn't mean they are clones of each other. I think we agree with this point. Yep, I agree that they must add more funds to the reserve and start some promotion in this forum. I have been in contact with the Splash team for a long time. Nothing is final yet, but they are interested in running some campaigns after fixing the bugs and adding new features.
There is one more thing ... I have problems with my eyesight and I think that anyone who wears glasses (I think there are many of them) experiences slight discomfort when trying to see input fields. Input fields should be slightly highlighted or marked with some mini lines that will help to catch the focus.
+1
I also have problems with my eyesight and wear glasses. When I visited the website for the first time, I was unable to find the input fields, but once I saw that, I couldn't undo it again. I would recommend them working on it as well.