Do you usually have background animation enabled?
It could be an animation loading error, which is why this error occurred.

Or you might be having a very busy month, and you've already reached the traffic limits for your website. 

Vrijeme je za jos jedan pregled mjesecnog stanja naseg boarda, ovaj put za Listopad 2025. Pregled je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te @TryNinja Ninjastic.space.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Listopada 2025

Tijekom Listopada na sem boardu je napisano 289 postova sto je mali (ali bitan) rast u odnosu na Rujan (272 postova). Nadam se da budemo nastavili sa ovim rastom, ali i ako ne, sve oko ovih brojki je i dalje super jer smo ne toliko davno (cca godina dana) pali i ispod 100 postova mjesecno.

---

Analiza merita za Listopad 2025

Tijekom Listopada podijeljeno je 281 merit, sto je najveci broj jos od Ozujka 2024. Odlican broj, kad se uzme u obzir broj postova, koji mislim da moze ici i jos gore, ali pod uvjetom da nam se pridruzi jos koji novi clan.




Lista onih koji su poslali te primili merit na nasem board, koja je otprilike jednaka kao i prosli mjesec. Listu posiljatelja predvodi Pmalek sa 71, a primatelja katanic97 sa 74 merita.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Listopada 2025

I za kraj ovomjesecnog pregleda, lista svih kojih su napisali makar 1 post na nasem boardu. Lista je kraca za par imena u odnosu na mjesec ranije, ali je uglavnom rijec o onima koji su napisali samo 1 post, tako da i nije neki gubitak.

slavkovic je naravno zadrzao prvo mjesto, katanic97 je ovaj put zavrsio na drugom, dok sam ja treci. Biti ce jako tesko svrgunit slackovica sa prvog mjesta, sad kad se ufurao i upao u stabilnu kampanju.

1. slackovic [62]
2. katanic97 [39]
3. Rikafip [33]
4. paco92x [26]
5. cryptofrka [23]
6. Pmalek [22]
7. ovcijisir [22]
8. Trofo [21]
9. examplens [14]
10. dkbit98 [10]
11. CroBoy12 [9]
12. GazetaBitcoin [2]
13. SirJohnVonSlotty [2]
14. joker404 [2]
15. EXMON [1]
16. MikeCro [1]

Yep, given their recent practice patterns, you might be right in your assumption, especially if they're no longer at the top of the heap and receive less public scrutiny.

I haven't paid much attention to them since they decided to withdraw their promotions on this forum; and that was the last time they strictly maintained their credibility and rated exchangers based on user reviews.

You can use the free bet to gamble on premier league and champion league games before the free bet expires.
Select some matches you want to bet on then you can stake it with the $5 dollar from your free bet, there is always an option for that for you to use it to stake the games you have selected. If you are confused about how this works, you can read the terms that encompasses how free bets/spins usage works on Bitsler.com. Wish you best of luck on your free bet!

Usually you will only find your free bet when going to sport bets section and betting in a game. It doesn't show in account balance.

So, go to sports bets section and try to make a $5 bet, I think it will work.

There are some opportunities there (like the bitsler campaign) , but certainly most of it is just trash

A few years ago I joined a nice reddit bounty there, requiring some posts per week in a such reddit for 20 usd per week in a good altcoin which could be instantly converted to btc.

Back in the day, as far as I know, it was a more prominent place, nowadays.. Not as much (unfortunately).

I don't think it will change anytime soon, but who knows

Yeah, I see Vave here as well, maybe someone else that's worth looking at, all the rest is bounties / airdrops from not so known projects around the board..

I agree. It has a good payment, > $80  per week.

Unfortunately, most users doesn't even visit the  Bounties(Altcoins) board, as it is full of spam and low quality bounties which barely pay anything...

Sometimes I take a look at that board, but not so often.

Switching to a BTC payment would certainly be much better to call attention

Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts. Feedback is always welcome and we are open to any suggestionns that can make the service better

To clarify.. Fujn Swap is built around strict privacy, so we do not disclose internal operations, liquidity sources, or backend structure. Protecting user privacy means keeping those details private, and this is intentional.

Regarding the networks you mentioned. When an asset is temporarily unavailable, it is never because of liquidity. It is simply routine maintenance, integration updates, or security checks. We prefer disabling a network for a short time rather than leaving it active in an unstable state. Once the maintenance is complete, the network becomes available again.

There is no risk of frozen funds, no unsafe behavior, and no hidden issue. Just privacy and standard maintenance.

He should get a reality check by being kicked off the campaign, not necessarily for complaining, but for doing it anonymously. Didn't even have the guts to reveal their identity. A signature campaign is a blessing in disguise, it's not your job and you shouldn't treat it like such, being petty for being a little late on payment on very rare occasions is petty, immature and ungrateful. Perhaps he's such a shtposter that he's anxious every week to see if he gets paid or the boot.

Uh, okay? I don't quite buy the "new".

Guys, thank you for your honest feedback regarding Telegram. We will consider your input and come up with a solution on how to expand the environment for submitting reports. We may also allow users to share their feedback directly here as well.
We just need some time, and we will return tomorrow with a proposed approach.
Hope to see you soon in Beta TWO.

Klopp left Slot an excellent foundation to build on, and Slot certainly used it well, winning the title. I also think that a lot is influenced by the fact that Salah is not in the kind of form he used to be in , he was simply the one who made the difference. I also believe that there is not much "chemistry" between the players and that they are in really big trouble. I don’t think anyone expected them to be in 11th place in the table. I hope the situation improves, but i definitely agree with what you said , Slot doesn’t have the capacity that Klopp had.

Cisto podsjetnik da je danas zadnji dan za ostaviti 2. predvidanje, a vidim da par sa naseg lokala jos nije ostavilo pa eto da ne propustite.

I don't do Reddit, or Telegram, or Twitter, or Discord or any other social media.

I do have a Telegram account, registered with an abandoned phone number, running in a VM on my old laptop. I don't want more things that take up my attention, if it's not on Bitcointalk, I'm not interested

Yeah, thanks to him we were finally able to create the subreddit, and it's still functioning well and hasn’t been banned.
We can definitely consider him part of the team.

And thank you as well for supporting us on Reddit.

---

You can easily access them through the links provided on the GitBook page dedicated to the Beta Test.
If you encounter any issues with any of the faucets, please let us know.
We can also send you testnet tokens directly, just specify which tokens you need and share your addresses.

---

Hey Bitcointalkers,
We still haven’t seen you participating in our OPEN BETA. I'm just curious about the reason for not joining (@dkbit98, @LoyceV, @bitmover).
Maybe there are some aspects of the OPEN BETA that you aren't satisfied with?

That's the disadvantage of relying too heavily on one player to score the goals; the day he blanks, the team suffers. I've been concerned about the city team allowing Halaand to score 90% of their goals this season; it makes them more vulnerable and easy to break because all you have to do is keep Halaand from scoring and you're good to go.  Nobody else would score.

I like how Chelsea and Arsenal spreads their goals - it gives opponent managers headaches not knowing who to man-mark.

Toga je uvijek mene bilo strah kod hardware walleta, degradacija i curenje baterije, degradacija memorije i slicno. Prije sam privatne kljuceve cuvao na kriptiranom USB sticku, no kad sam jednom imao lose iskustvo sa stickom koji mi vise nije htio ucitati podatke (na stecu jedan drugi, nevezan za crypto) te kad sam shvatio da USB memorija ima rok trajanja, sam sve prebacio na wallet ciji seed cuvam na fizickom mediju.

Ma vrlo malo sam ga koristio. Odnosio sam se prema njemu kao prema klasičnom hardware walletu - na njemu sam držao samo kripto koji je bio za long term hold. Ajmo reći da sam ga u prosjeku palio jednom u tjedan-dva. Mislim da je jednostavno riječ o lošoj kvaliteti hardvera. Ali moram priznati da nisam vidio baš puno komentara s takvim problemima tako da je moguće samo da je bila riječ o lošoj seriji koja me dopala.

Slot did not become a bad manager overnight. He took them to the Premier League title in his first season. Even though it was the team that Klopp built, the fact remains Slot was manager when they became champions. Nobody can work out why everything is going wrong for him.

The decline at Liverpool has coincided with their British record purchase of Isak (and his subsequent injury) as well as the complete loss of form that Salah is facing. It seems the team plays well when Salah is playing well. They have won six and lost six of their first twelve Premier League games. They must hope for stability when Isak manages to return to the first team.

Kad mogu Vitalik Buterin, Džo Lubin, Čarls Hoskinson, Justin Sun i mnogi drugi, zašto ne bi mogao i Lukas
Ljudi su  ponudili svoje shitcoine, niko nije bio prisiljen da ih kupuje. Za mene je neverovatan fenomen što postoje ljudi spremni da ih kupuju.

I don't expect them to win against City, it's quite difficult but not impossible but I do expect them to at least get a goal at home to hit my BTS pick. It's been a tense game so far.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (17) 9068 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2353 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4279 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2666 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9824 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3201 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (1) 8771 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 112493: Pmalek (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 8233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1610 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1650 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (36) 1836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2587 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12369 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5931 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6514 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6429 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3150 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9210 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 672 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4061 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3457 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11037 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11166 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2294 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4113 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 19351 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6182 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2845 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 8492 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2038 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1311 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 958 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 441 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1461 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3550 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1091 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3251 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 1350 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6421 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +93 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1799 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2122 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14846 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2120 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3074 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 11016 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2153 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1964 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8947 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2387 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3066 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 7077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19370 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2248 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2403 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5081 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 5136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1482 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +40 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1855 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1102 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5276 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 7406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1714 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9087 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1516 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 8923 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1139 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6615 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1354 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8035 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Teško da mogu biti veća ako im je cilj da cijela adresa bude na ekranu. Morali su veći displej ugraditi ako hoće i veća slova. Ne znam kakav je Nano X, nisam ga nikad koristio. Imam Ledger Nano S kod kojeg je ekran manji nego kod Trezor One modela. Kod provjere adrese, Ledger je podjeli u tri dijela ali su slova i brojevi veći nego kod Trezora. Neki se žale što cijela adresa nije vidljiva na ekranu ali je to čak i prednost. Lakše je provjeriti jedan dio pa drugi i na kraju treći nego se mučiti sa malim fontom.

That's true, of course, I hadn't thought of it that way. Not only could game providers have something against VPN use, but in some countries it could also lead to the casino being banned for use by residents. So it actually makes perfect sense that a (larger) casino wouldn't officially advertise this.

---

I'm glad that Whale is hosting contests again, thank you for that! I wanted to participate right away, but the contest seems to be full already. So I hope there will be a new round soon

Yeah I have noticed how accurate tags given by non-DT users escalate and most times attracts  more tags from DT users to concretise the accusations. it often catches the attention of DT users who then review the case themselves.

On the other hand, biased or low-effort tags from non-DT users usually get ignored or even countered by DT members. I take red tags seriously when DT-members co-tags the same account tagged by a non-DT user.

They continue this cartel without hesitation, because despite so many complaints against them, brands like Bestchange are still supporting these works of changenow. Because bestchange never takes the side of the victim customer, they always take the side of exchanges like changenow and mark the customer's complaint as neutral. So here changenow is still continuing their business without resolving this case and without returning the OP's funds. Changenow is listed in Bestchange and they are getting licenses to scam more and more new crypto users.

I get your point, dude, and I agree with you because it's true. The size of the amount wagered is pointless if you've never even held a sum like $10,000. So it's much better if your wager
is only $100 and luck suddenly sides with you, and you win, let's say, just $20,000.

Of course, an amount like that is already a big help to us. Only a stupid person would probably decide to continue gambling when we know we can already cash that out.
Even if I have to pass KYC if the casino requires it, that's fine. How much more for $100,000, which, when you think about it, is truly a life-changing amount.

I used to think it's not about how much one has wagered but how much he or she has won in total right? What is the essence of wagering millions in dollars on the gambling casino meanwhile your self in real life may not look like someone who has ever touched $10k as his or her own?

For me though, I have no interest in operating a gambling account that has millions of dollars in amount wagered, whereas I could barely feed well, the type of luck I need right now is one where even though my casino account is showing I've only wagered a total of $100, i want to have won $100k or even more, from here, let me decide if I want to still continue gambling or not 😂

Yeah, I believe they are cross-posting their promotion in different platforms to maximize exposure. I do not see any problem with that, instead I find it good since the platform is putting their best to cover people from different platforms in informing them about the promotion, or bonuses the Casino is currently offering.




There are some cryptocurrencies, although not tokens, that have outperformed Bitcoin growth during the said timeline.  One of which is BNB, where BNB growth reaches 255% against Bitcoin's 131%.

Yeah, the usual story: open a one-year chart, point at a candle and say “should’ve bought/sold right here.” Even a fridge could become a trader with hindsight Finding a chart where ZEC outperforms BTC is easy. Predicting those moments *before* they happen — that’s the real magic nobody has.

Here’s the translation in иронично-криптовом стиле:

Yeah, the usual story: open a one-year chart, point at a candle and say “should’ve bought/sold right here.” Even a fridge could become a trader with hindsight Finding a chart where ZEC outperforms BTC is easy. Predicting those moments *before* they happen — that’s the real magic nobody has.

Ja sam pricao da,gledao sam s vremena na vreme wallete i ono sto ste mi predlagali. Narucio sam Safe 3 danas. Hteo sam Safa 5 ali sam odustao,i ovaj ce da radi posao svakako. Hvala sto si podelio ovaj popust,kad stigne slikacu i postavicu ovde.

This is not a trading or investment topic, this is a casino topic. Although many people here discuss the BFG token of their platform, you cannot discuss any other coin here for trading or investment. What you are doing is spamming. don't do it.

He never talks about how much he loses in gambling or worries when he wins a big jackpot. You will often see stories of someone winning big from gambling. But you will not see him telling how much he lost behind his win. Gamblers share two types of stories, one is the story of his ruin and the other is the story of his big fortune. He does not reveal anything in between or does not want anyone to know.

You're clearly not the only one who has lost a lot on gambling. In fact, there are significantly more people who lose than win. It's normal that in the long run, gamblers will be at a loss, while individual wins, whether on Betfury or any other gambling platform, are always a matter of luck.


Well, for example, if you had bought ZEC instead of BTC and just held it for the same period, you would have earned much more now.

Thank you for your question - it’s completely reasonable, and we appreciate you raising it.

EXMON has been operating for many years, but we’ve never focused on public marketing and we’ve never bought reviews. There’s an entire industry built around “reputation boosting” - we get offers almost every day from companies that sell large batches of positive reviews on forums and rating sites. Many projects rely on this, which is why their “public reputation” can look so impressive.

We’ve always stayed away from that. It creates a nice façade, but it doesn’t reflect real user experience. And let’s be honest: trusting online reviews nowadays is difficult. When everything goes smoothly, users rarely go out of their way to leave a detailed positive review unless they’re incentivized with money or bonuses. But if something goes wrong, they will definitely write about it everywhere.

That’s why the only honest indicator is not the number of positive reviews, but the absence of negative ones. For us, that is the real measure of quality.
As for Escrow - we just launched it, so there are no “historical volumes” to talk about yet. It’s a new service, and we’re open about that.

If your question is about trading volumes on the exchange - those are fully public and visible on the charts for each trading pair.