Imaš dosta info o tome na BPIP-u pa prokopaj ako ti je interesantno.

Ovo ti je top 10:

dkbit98   215
LoyceV   131
cryptofrka   74
Rikafip   68
Pmalek   67
FatFork   54
Trofo   39
Daniel91   30
ovcijisir   28
examplens   26

Znači 9/10 ti je naših. Apes strong together.

Exactly, I see no reason to delist it; I use DAI because it can't be confiscated.
Its primary reasons for creation include:

• Technical evolution: It was designed to update and improve upon its predecessor by offering a faster, more secure system adapted to the new stage of DeFi.
• Yield generation: allows users to access native rewards (via sUSDS)
• Security and liquidity: It is backed by the Parity Stability Module (PSM) and overcollateralization mechanisms

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (61) 14572 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 9935 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5406 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1765 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4693 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2868 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3528 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2767 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 9838 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6673 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2068 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6248 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2535 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2157 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (12) 6602 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1906 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1528 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6262 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3718 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (34) 10098 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4395 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3919 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2821 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4585 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (67) 21140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6355 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3105 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 9997 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4116 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1956 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3844 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1358 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2297 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4607 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15584 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3537 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 12850 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2316 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2081 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2621 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7568 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3431 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 20872 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2899 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 5740 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1598 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +47 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3730 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4087 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1558 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5630 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8081 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1883 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5343 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6416 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1278 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3534 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1004 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +43 / =0 / -0) (8732 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Yes, we are change it in next update.

That's one of the biggest problems with this type of email service.
They are easily used for spam schemes.

This makes normal email use difficult, since many other services will classify emails from this service as spam, even when they are not.

Pisem ovaj mjesecni pregled naseg boarda za Svibanj, a ruka mi drhti zbog nemilih dogadjaja sinoc (da parafraziram kultnu scenu citanja oporuke iz Maratonaca) u kojem smo tesko pokradeni. Pregled je kao i inace napravljen uz pomoc pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Svibanj 2026 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Svibnja 2026

Tijekom Svinja na nasem boardu je napisano 342 posta, sto je ogroman rast u odnosu na Travanj tijekom kojeg je napisano 265 postova. Ako se pogleda onaj donji chart, mzoe se vidjeti da nam je to najbolji rezultat u zadnjih godinu dana, tocnije jos od Svibnja 2025.

---

Analiza merita za Svibanj 2026

Rast broja postova prouzrocio je i rast broja merita, tako da je tijekom Svibnja na nasem boardu podijeljeno ukupno 288 merita, sto je veliki rast u odnosu na travanjskih 198.




Standardna imena predvode listu posiljatelja te primatelja: Pmalek na vrhu prvih sa 99 poslanih merita tijekom Svibnja, dok je katanic97 na vrhu loste primatelja tijekom istog razdoblja sa 78 merita.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Svibnja 2026

Na samom kraju pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu tijekom Svibnja. Nakon recnetne domacije slackovica, doslo je do smjene na vrhu: Daniel91 je prvi sa 44 posta, ovcijisir je nedaleko od njga na 2. mjestu sa 42 posta dok je katanic takodjer bliozu na 3. sa 41 postom.

Ocekujemo da slackovic uzvrati udarac te se vrati na svoju prirodnu poziciju, ali mislim da cemo za to morati sacekati da opet upadne u placenu signature kampanju.


1. Daniel91 [44]
2. ovcijisir [42]
3. katanic97 [41]
4. SirJohnVonSlotty [39]
5. slackovic [35]
6. Rikafip [32]
7. dkbit98 [23]
8. Pmalek [19]
9. examplens [18]
10. Trofo [13]
11. cryptofrka [11]
12. Joca97 [7]
13. BitGoba [7]
14. paco92x [3]
15. ETZ-Swap [2]
16. EXMON [1]
17. CroBoy12 [1]
18. b1ack [1]
19. DEX.fo_off [1]
20. BetByRent [1]
21. cryptonic240 [1]

---

ps:jebem mater VARu i modernom nogometu.

I think transparency is important, but trust cannot be reduced to simply having an "About Us" page. A service's track record, the speed of processing transactions, and the way it handles customers are also key factors people rely on. As for KYC, it is only applied when necessary to meet compliance requirements, not to every customer by default.

They wrote that its about AML Mode, meaning a mode in which they DO NOT CHECK AML %, thats what their mode is called on their website

Im asking if there was some kind of hack on an exchange or something that caused so many bitcoins to flow through a mode where they DONT CHECK AML.

bcs if they cant process them, it must be a HUGE amount

i think they should change the name on the website, bcs its called AML Mode instead of NO AML Mode

Nije baš tako. Ima manjih mjenjačnica koje rade bez KYC-a. Ja recimo koristim BloFin i dosad nisam imao loših iskustava. Prije toga sam koristio BingX dok nisu uveli obavezan KYC. Naravno, tamo trgujem s lovom za koju neću plakati ako ostanem bez nje jer znam da je sve to "divlji zapad". Ali slično mišljenje imam i o CEX-ovima koji imaju obavezan KYC.

Lightning je sloj za svakodnevna plaćanja, slično kao Visa i Mastercard u fiat sistemu. Treba da ga prihvati što više ljudi i trgovaca u razmjeni dobara i usluga.Mjenjačnice ga ne moraju nužno prihvatati

Ako ti kao trgovac primiš Lightning Bitcoin za svoju robu, a onda tim istim Lightning Bitcoinom platiš svog dobavljača, a on plati svog radnika radnik plati robu od drugog trgovca  i tako u krug  mjenjačnica vam uopšte ne treba

Broj kanala i nodova, kao i količina BTC zaključana u kanalima, jesu korisni indikatori, ali po mom mišljenju nisu glavni. Pravi pokazatelj uspjeha je broj trgovaca koji prihvataju Lightning u stvarnoj razmjeni dobara i usluga.

Za sada postoji BTCMap.org, gdje se može pratiti koliko trgovaca prihvata Bitcoin i Lightning u stvarnoj razmjeni dobara i usluga.

Should be.

With what was confirmed to EarnOnVictor three months ago, EarnOnVictor said his disinterest in the account retrieval anymore, and what my contact only obviously confirmed what conveyed from three months ago, the account is fully his without restriction, after he finished KYC.

So whether or not he do the KYC, case should be safely able to be marked as resolved.

I didn't say that Those are the normal users waiting patiently (and checking frequently) for the file to be updated.

Yes.

I've never created an API, and I kinda don't want to restrict access to data.

Everything is working – the calculator is doing all the calculations. Could you please describe in more detail exactly what isn’t working for you and attach some screenshots?
https://ibb.co/8DPdp68Z
https://ibb.co/SXWz6p1t

Ehh?

It's actually reactivated by Godzill5 on #17 and inquired again by logfiles. I happened to re-indexing casino disputes for my v2 list and I reached BetFury and wanted to know whether or not I should mark this as resolved or other status, hence post #19, that EarnOnVictor replied on #20 with a screenshot. And I already reached my own contact to get an update and see if we can get a better understanding, wheel already turning, and I merely conveyed what they said to me on edit on #21.

I would beg to differ that I am repeating what was said, given EoV, The rep asked to escalate to risk team so it can be further looked into, my contact assured me that the account can be recovered to full feature once KYC done, after reaching risk team.

In my country, both VPNs and TOR are actively blocked. However, I refrain from using TOR. I do use a VPN. 🙋

I'm a big fan of Chesterton. His hero advised always hiding a dry leaf in an autumn forest. In my country, 50 percent of the population uses VPNs, while very few use TOR. ISPs are usually well aware that users are using TOR, and this can create problems even for a conscientious user. Yes, I know about the possibility of using a VPN-TOR combination... However, even in this case, it's impossible to completely eliminate the possibility of a broken secure internet connection, in which case the ISP will still detect your use of TOR.

Regarding the affiliate program, I also have questions about maintaining anonymity and privacy (analytics programs like Chainalysis monitor 24/7).

CZ-u ne bih baš previše vjerovao a nije da se već puno kripto mjenjačnica nije uskladilo sa MICA, kod nas u Hrvatskoj Electrocoin je bio prvi.
Dakle, nema tu previše politike već ili ćeš napraviti što treba da se uskladiš sa novom regulacijom ili si izgubio dio tržišta.
A koliko god se bunili zbog te stroge regulative u EU oko kripto mjenjačnica, s druge strane zbog toga se korisnici ipak mogu nadati povratu novca u slučaju nekih problema, kao nedavno sa FTX-om.
A tko ne želi koristiti takve mjenjačnice uvijek ima altenativu i mjenjačnice bez kyc.

Da, slažem se.
Po meni idealan osobni portfelj bi bio kombinacija niskorizičnih, srednjerizičnih i visokorizičnih financijskih ulaganja.
Recimo, u porfelju bi mogli biti crypto, ETF-ovi, investicijski fondovi, dionice, te zlato i start ovi.
To je samo jedan mogući primjer a do sada sam shvatio jednu istinu, da prava diverzifikacija nije ulagati u različite kriptovalute već u različite klase imovine jer ako sve imaš uloženo u istu klasu imovine i krene trend pada, sve ti pada.

@examplens
Fair point on Chipmixer — that case is exactly why "trust us, we don't log" isn't enough as a promise. 7 TB "on a service that saved nothing" tells you everything about the gap between what services claim and what actually happens. The takedown showed that promises about data are only meaningful when the architecture makes it technically hard to save data in the first place.
That's the direction we push. Not "we promise we don't log" — but designing so that most of what could be logged simply isn't ever collected. Order data has a limited lifetime tied to the operational window; there's no user account layer accumulating history; no session tracking; no IP retention beyond what's needed to route the response.
We can't prove this from the outside — you're right about that. What we can do is stay consistent and let time do the verifying.
@bitmover
"The only way to protect your data is to never share it" — this is the actual answer, no matter how good the service. VPN/Tor + fresh addresses + minimum footprint at every step. A privacy-focused service does the last mile; the first 99% is on the user. We say the same to our own users, and it's the reason we push the Tor mirror as a first option, not an afterthought.
@MarryWithBTC
The Chipmixer / FBI question is a fair one — with law enforcement seizures, we only ever see the narrative the agency releases. Whether the 7 TB was operational data, honeypot traps, or evidence packaged for court — we don't know. What matters for the rest of us is the lesson: if a service can technically save it, sooner or later something gets saved.
About affiliate — you nailed the honest version. If someone's personal threat model is "no data about me anywhere, ever" — an affiliate program isn't the fit, and shouldn't be. Our affiliate system is for people running promotion who accept trackable identifiers as part of doing partner work. Users doing swaps stay in the no-account lane. Two different threat models, two different systems.
@aoluain
Exactly right — the two-pronged approach. Service side controls what's collected on their end; user side controls what leaves theirs. Neither can substitute for the other. And you're spot on that "No KYC / No AML / No registration" isn't just a slogan — it's actually a technical commitment about what a service refuses to collect in the first place.
Access via Tor plus VPN plus fresh addresses is the standard we'd recommend to any privacy-focused user, whether they use us or anyone else.
Thanks all — this is the kind of thread that makes the whole community smarter.

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan Juli 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 106 user (bertambah 3 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist n0nce YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon jeremypwr gbianchi EFS stompix hilariousandco arulbero buckrogers Buchi-88 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki buwaytress crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket PowerGlove God Of Thunder SirJohnVonSlotty

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana Husna QA YOSHIE roycilik

Sumber: DT update log Juli 2026

This month 106 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

iskreno meni je startup malo drugaciji rizik-profil od ETFa. doduse, jedan startup moze 25x ali moze i na nulu dok mi je broad market ETF vise onaj "dosadni" dio portfelja koji ne mora eksploridati nego samo polako i sigurno raditi svoje. ali to je vise stvar toga sto svatko trazi razlicitu ulogu od svakog dijela portfelja, tebi je taj startup ocito odlicno prosao 

Negdje sam vidio da je CZ neki dan rekao da je sve u biti bilo rijeseno, a onda se politika umjesala, kao odluke iz vrha EU. Njemu generalno nije za vjerovati, ali isto tako znamo i da je EU katastrofa sto sto tice regulativa tako da ne bih bio iznenadjen da to i je istina.

Hvala, to govorim iz praktičnog i osobnog iskustva.
Meni se trenutno moja investicija u 1 start up od prije 5 godina već sada puno više isplatila nego da sam ta sredstva nastavio držati u btc.
Start up je od onda narastao 6 X sa daljnjom tendencijom rasta od 5-10 X zbog širenja u regiji dok je btc od onda, po trenutnoj cijeni, narastao tek 2x pa je to bio sjajan djelomičan izlaz iz crypta i odličan primjer kako diverzifikacija može pomoći u rastu osobnog portfelja.
Naravno, bilo je malo i rizika u početku jer sa start upovima uvijek riskiraš ali u mojem slučaju se isplatilo i očekujem izlaz za 3-4 godine sa zaradom 25-40x.
Sa btc takav rast ipak nije realan (osim za one koji su ušli u btc priču kada je btc bio ispod 1000 $).

Da, slažem se.
Iskreno, ljut sam na njih jer i dan danas dobivam spam emailove zbog njihovog propusta da bolje zaštite privatne podatke svojih kupaca (sad mi je žao što sam ledger išao naručivati direktno od njih umjesto da sam ga kupio u Linksu) ali ne zaštititi dobro podatke svojih kupaca je jedna stvar a namjerno koristiti zlonamjerne nodove, to mi nema smisla i ne vidim što bi dobili od toga osim dugoročne štete i poslovnog gubitka zbog gubitka korisnika?

It is also essential to know or at least seek out services which state


So if anything is going to be collected its an IP address.

slazem se, mozda i napravim zaseban thread kada skupim malo vise konkretnih iskustava da ima smisla. ovaj je krenuo kao moje pitanje pa se prirodno vise vrtilo oko platformi ali tema "realna iskustva sa ETF/S&P za nas iz hr/regije" bi moga biti korisna

i slazem se s danijelom oko diverzifikacije, meni je cijela poanta i bila krenuti polako s nekim broad market ETFom kao protutezom cryptu, bas da ne budu sva jaja u istoj kosari 

I know that Chipmixer case was deeply related to FBI. When such data was recovered, what actually was done with it? Were they personal data or financial data. How are we sure FBI didn't frame them to look worse in the eyes of the people?

Well, I was keen to knowing the answer DEX will provide about your question of running a affiliate program without saving data. I was satisfied with their answer, but the truth remains what you said. Someone who is so conscious of their privacy should not have business enrolling in the affiliate program.

In the end, the only way to protect your data is to never share it.

When using services that you want privacy, it is better to use a VPN or Tor. Always try to use a fresh new bitcoin address, etc.

If in the future some data leak, you don't have anything sensitive to be leaked.

I fear they treat us all like frogs...

Teoretski je moguće ali ja se više bojim da će me jato golubova napasti, ubiti i odnijeti moje tijelo da ne ostane ništa mojim najmilijim da sahrane nego što će neki wallet odlučiti da namjerno prikazuje pogrešne transakcije u mojim novčanicima i da mi lažno prikazuje kripto koji nije tu. Al će se usrećiti.

As promised to emf ellow local board member few hours ago, here is the brief overview of local boards for May 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview nevertheless.

---

Post activity per local board during May 2026

During May, 13781 posts were made across local boards which is an increase compared to April's numbers (13283). This increase has been spread among the most active boards, and one that had biggest increase was Nigerian that is again back at over 4k posts. Summer is coming, so let's see how situation develops and whether that affects activity.

---

Active members per local board during May 2026

1322 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards during May, that makes an increase compared to month before, during which 1276 members were active. Nigerian board remained at the top, and thanks mainly to them we have this increase. Unfortunately, French continues its descent towards the bottom.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during May 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leader is Polish with 70%, while at the same time Pakistan is at the bottom with 17% of such members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Greek board with 60% (probably because they have no one who wrote 10+ posts), while Polish has only 20%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian local board is the leader with 52%, while before mentioned Greek is at the bottom of this bracket as they didn't have s single member who wrote 10+ posts during May in their local board.

---

Merit shared per local board during May 2026

During May, 6655 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, and is a big drop compared to April's 7452. Majority of this drop happened on German board (1146-489), which is somewhat known for big fluctuations in merit distribution so its probably not s cause for concern.

It is also good to see French board back on this chart, even if with only 2 merits sent.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during May 2026

In May, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, which is an decrease compared to April's 0.56. Still a very good merit per post ratio I would say.

Romanian board is back at the top with a very high 1.75 merit per post, Italian is 2nd with also very high 1.37 ratio, while last month's top board, Spanish, is at the 3rd spot while having 1.08 merit per post ratio. At the bottom is once again Greek board, and French is right next to them with not much better ratio.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during May 2026

536 member sent while 586 members received merit in one of the local boards, which is not that big differnece compared to April (530 senders, 601 receiver) when you take into consideration the drop in the number of merit shared. Needless to say Nigerian is once again at the top, leaving every other board far behind.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during May 2026

No surprise here-Romanian board is once again at the top, this time while having 72% of posts merited, but Italian is also not too far behind with 54%, especially when you consider how much more active Italian board is.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during May 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habit of local boards.

---

The most active members per local board during May 2026 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. Numeral (137) and jokers10 (1310 from Russian local board were the two most active memebrs in local board, while last month's top poster joker_josue has (125) to satisfy with the 3rd spot

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Numeral [137]	|	1. MaxMueller [84]	|	1. mandown [121]	|	1. fillippone [40]	|	1. joker_josue [125]	|	1. Porfirii [54]	|
2. jokers10 [131]	|	2. Soonandwaite [60]	|	2. yenerbatmaz [73]	|	2. Ale88 [38]	|	2. sabotag3x [67]	|	2. famososMuertos [35]	|
3. klarki [117]	|	3. MinoRaiola [52]	|	3. RaltcoinsB [69]	|	3. babo [33]	|	3. TryNinja [57]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [19]	|
4. safar1980 [115]	|	4. mole0815 [52]	|	4. Phoenix Anka [61]	|	4. Plutosky [30]	|	4. alegotardo [48]	|	4. Hispo [17]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [112]	|	5. cygan [47]	|	5. kriminall [58]	|	5. Italian Panic [27]	|	5. bitmover [44]	|	5. Filicius [14]	|
6. zasad@ [95]	|	6. Lakai01 [47]	|	6. Hvdv [57]	|	6. Cassius55 [22]	|	6. Forsyth Jones [40]	|	6. darxiaomi [14]	|
7. Alex077 [93]	|	7. Unknown01 [41]	|	7. Balmain [55]	|	7. Paolo.Demidov [15]	|	7. criptoevangelista [39]	|	7. danadc [13]	|
8. internetional [86]	|	8. Koal-84 [37]	|	8. Mustang Shelby [55]	|	8. alexrossi [13]	|	8. mikel_012 [31]	|	8. Allo-obmen [13]	|
9. tvplus006 [86]	|	9. Real-Duke [35]	|	9. Silence Scream [51]	|	9. *Ace* [12]	|	9. Paredao [29]	|	9. darbitmobilerecovery [11]	|
10. xandry [73]	|	10. mv1986 [31]	|	10. Xyloo [51]	|	10. bitcoiner180 [11]	|	10. rdluffy [25]	|	10. Marmeladka.cc [11]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [95]	|	1. winspiral [10]	|	1. Peanutswar [43]	|	1. Daniel91 [44]	|	1. Floxynice [100]	|	1. khaled0111 [36]	|
2. Luzin [45]	|	2. TryNinja [5]	|	2. cryptoaddictchie [36]	|	2. ovcijisir [42]	|	2. Lenubari [58]	|	2. Kavelj22 [27]	|
3. AakZaki [35]	|	3. gaelium [5]	|	3. tech30338 [34]	|	3. katanic97 [41]	|	3. Africolo [56]	|	3. yhiaali3 [26]	|
4. Husna QA [35]	|	4. HashRate Hero [4]	|	4. arwin100 [32]	|	4. SirJohnVonSlotty [39]	|	4. Mr Reporter [51]	|	4. Ochan_yazo_tochant [13]	|
5. masulum [28]	|	5. graphtek [3]	|	5. PX-Z [30]	|	5. slackovic [35]	|	5. Karl_3000 [49]	|	5. OmegaStarScream [7]	|
6. kawetsriyanto [26]	|	6. oscar2000 [2]	|	6. julerz12 [26]	|	6. Rikafip [32]	|	6. Agbamoni [48]	|	6. GxSTxV [7]	|
7. mu_enrico [25]	|	7. ETZ-Swap [2]	|	7. GreatArkansas [23]	|	7. dkbit98 [23]	|	7. Charles-Tim [46]	|	7. hugeblack [6]	|
8. joniboini [23]	|	8. DenisDenis [1]	|	8. SatsPH [23]	|	8. Pmalek [19]	|	8. PremiumcryptoHub [45]	|	8. RedFlix [3]	|
9. taufik123 [21]	|	9. patrickus [1]	|	9. bhadz [22]	|	9. examplens [18]	|	9. Exitoral [41]	|	9. mikeywith [2]	|
10. dansus021 [20]	|	10. Halab [1]	|	10. coin-investor [22]	|	10. Trofo [13]	|	10. Sammye3 [40]	|	10. syriano [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [16]	|	1. Cointikka [50]	|	1. BlackHatCoiner [9]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [20]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [75]	|	1. Bd officer [24]	|
2. TryNinja [5]	|	2. JSRAW [48]	|	2. cryptosize [8]	|	2. NeuroticFish [6]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [43]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [20]	|
3. inspace [2]	|	3. Bitcoin Smith [27]	|	3. alani123 [2]	|	3. TryNinja [5]	|	3. Ab de villiers [36]	|	3. Crypto Library [12]	|
4. pawel7777 [1]	|	4. vivekdhyani1 [23]	|	4. Ultegra134 [2]	|	4. gigica viteazu` [1]	|	4. snowpega [32]	|	4. Z_MBFM [7]	|
5. EXMON [1]	|	5. pawanjain [22]	|	5. Dimitris [2]	|	5. othell_rogue [1]	|	5. HustleZ [32]	|	5. Shishir99 [5]	|
6. icopress [1]	|	6. eaLiTy [16]	|	6. BitcoinsGreece [2]	|	6. IonCreanga [1]	|	6. Rustam Meraj [30]	|	6. Review Master [4]	|
7. CryptoCrookz [1]	|	7. M47AK16 [9]	|	7. xProe [1]	|	7. b1ack [1]	|	7. Jaweria parveen [30]	|	7. Nothingtodo [4]	|
8. hexan123 [1]	|	8. TheUltraElite [6]	|	8. BetByRent [1]	|	8. BetByRent [1]	|	8. Abdul Sami786 [30]	|	8. Royal Cap [3]	|
9. StefanTaylor [1]	|	9. Jimmymoriarty [6]	|	9. manos555555 [1]	|		|	9. CryptoYar [29]	|	9. malekbaba [2]	|
10. vid3 [1]	|	10. Lostbtc05 [5]	|	10. katsman [1]	|		|	10. Junii [29]	|	10. shasan [2]	|

Da, informacije i mogućnost komunikacije su važni aspekti ovog foruma, ali i mogućnost monetizacije svog forumskog statusa kroz signature kampanje.
Međutim, čini mi se da ''mlađe generacije'' nemaju baš strpljenja za internetske forume poput ovoga, gdje ipak treba uložiti neko vrijeme i trud da bi se dostigla određena razina i status, određeni rank itd. i rasije posežu za instant rješenjima poput Google i AI odgovora.
Generalni je trend da ipak pada interes za forume na Internetu i da se ovdje ipak okuplja malo starija ekipa.

I never saw message like this before in my life. By the way, I am using Swiftkey. If I were you, I would probably do factory reset just to be sure. It is pain in the ass, but better be safe than sorry.


Not that it changes anything, but they do have new CEO now, named Felix Fan. 

@examplens
Fair correction on AudiA6 — 5 years is a long run, you're right. "Collapsed so fast" was poor phrasing. What I meant was that once the takedown was triggered, the architecture allowed the whole thing to fall in a single action. The lifespan was long, but the failure mode was instant. That's the part worth flagging.
About how an ordinary user verifies where data is stored — fully agreed, it's mostly trust-based. A user can check the Tor mirror, look at the response headers (to spot Cloudflare or similar proxies), test PGP signatures, and observe how a service handles incidents. But ultimately you can't verify infrastructure from the outside. That's why publicly explaining the architecture and standing behind it consistently matters — over time, behavior reveals the truth.
About the affiliate program — sharp observation, and you're hitting a real tension. Yes, an affiliate program requires tracking partner IDs, cookies, click attribution, and some form of identifier persistence. We're aware that's a trade-off with our "no accounts" principle.
The plan is to keep affiliate data fully separated from user-side data. Affiliates get an account with their own login because they need a dashboard, payout history, partner ID. Users still don't get an account — they just paste a referral link and swap as usual. The partner side stores the partner's data; the swap side stores nothing about the user beyond the operational window.
So affiliates get tracking, users don't. Two separate systems, intentionally.
About the Mercedes / Chinese cars parallel — fair point. Claims of superiority age differently depending on the brand and the audience. Best lesson taken: let the product talk over time, don't claim a position you haven't yet earned.
@FP91G
Interesting framing — "stay small to stay safe." Honestly, that strategy has its own risks. Small services often have less infrastructure resilience, less reserve depth, and less institutional ability to handle problems. Being a "small fish" doesn't make you invisible — sometimes it just makes you easier to swallow.
Z-tight nailed it below — you don't really get to choose the size of your fishbowl. Either the community uses your service or it doesn't. The right response isn't to stay artificially small, but to design for survivability at any scale. That's what we're trying to do.
@MarryWithBTC
Glad the celebration was solid! 🍻 As for the new raffle — fair strategy, going for round two. Good luck!
About refund-as-mandatory — exactly. Making it optional sounds user-friendly until 30% of orders end up in manual review because users forgot to fill it. Better to be clear and require it.
About reserves display — agreed, it's one of the trust signals users check first. Fixing it properly is a priority. And your "fishermen turning to riverbank fish" line is sharp — captures the dynamic better than the original framing.
@Z-tight
Exactly this. "Don't take the actions or inactions that didn't end well for them" — that's the real lesson from AudiA6 and others before it. The point isn't to hide. The point is to build like you've already watched the failure cases play out, because we have.
Thanks for keeping the discussion grounded.
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

I think I could not present it grammatically well here, so you may not have understood, but I have made it clear in my next line that there is always a fear working in my mind.
I mean, whenever I want to use all kinds of financial apps, I use the apps out of fear. But my phone is used completely separately, it is used only for working, and this issue never happened before. Recently, after some updates came to Binance, when I went to log in again, these issues are coming in front of me.  And this is why I created the topic to be clear, is anyone else facing this kind of problem? I am also telling you the phone model is s24 ultra.

This brings me to the question of what level these apps have access to on our devices. I have also received warnings while trying to authorize transactions. I got a phone call on WhatsApp immediately; they warned me with “Binance will never call you on the phone" or something of that nature.


A lot of management change in just a short period of time. I just made a search and confirmed Felix Fan has taken over as the CEO on February 11th, 2026.

🚨 AudiA6 takedown — what we should all learn from this
On June 11, 2026 — Europol along with law enforcement from 11 countries shut down AudiA6. The service moved about $389 million through 6,000 fraudulent accounts. Two admins arrested in Georgia, servers seized, domains shut down, Telegram channels blocked. Up to 20 years in prison.
It's a loud story — and it carries some lessons that apply to every service in this niche.
🔍 Why AudiA6 collapsed so fast
The main reason isn't that they got "tracked." The main reason was concentrated architecture:
— Cloudflare as the front — meaning a third-party intermediary that hands over everything when asked

— Servers in a single location — one raid, everything goes at once

— Single database — find the admin panel, get the entire history

— Shared domains and Telegram channels — block one, the rest fall
One hit, and the whole service fell. That's the concentration problem.
✅ Why DEX.fo is built differently
— No Cloudflare. No third-party middlemen between us and the user

— Distributed infrastructure. No single point of failure — data isn't sitting on one server

— Minimal footprint. We don't collect what isn't needed to complete a swap

— No accounts. No user database to take. Every order is its own isolated entity
This isn't marketing or slogans. It's a technical decision made at the design stage.
💡 What you can take away personally
If you're using any service in this niche, check:

Does the service use Cloudflare? If yes — that's a vulnerability
Where is order data stored? If on a single server — that's a vulnerability
Is there registration / accounts? If yes — that's a database that can be seized
Is there PGP signing of operations? If not — you can't verify the source

That's a basic checklist. Worth running against any exchanger claiming privacy.

---

@MarryWithBTC
Haha, the alarm-while-driving scenario is exactly how reminders fail in real life. Best laid plans of mice and men. 🙂
About the prize — checking with @Peanutswar on the timing, should land soon. Sorry about the beer tab running ahead of the payout! Enjoy the friends regardless.
Also — appreciated your "Mercedes ads" reference. That captures the spirit better than we did.
@joniboini
Good question on the UI rework. It covers exactly the kind of stuff that's come up in this thread:
— Refund address field — clear placeholder "Refund address (required) — same network as the deposit", inline format check, tooltip explaining why it's mandatory

— Exchange button state — instead of being grayed out silently, it will show what's missing

— Onion link placement — moving to the top of the page where privacy-focused users expect it

— Order tracking — easier access from the navigation

— Fee breakdown — platform fee + network fee shown separately, no more guessing where the cost came from

— Reserves display — stable real-time values without the refresh fluctuation we had

— BTC/USD reference — uniform across all pairs
The current UI works, you're right. But these are the small frictions that turn into real losses — users who couldn't figure out the gray button, or thought the refund field was optional and got stuck. Each one shouldn't happen.
@examplens
Fair point and we take it. You're right that talking down competitors isn't a good PR move, and the niche is competitive enough without that kind of framing.
What we wanted to highlight is the technical difference — there are services that call themselves "automatic" while running through manual queues or sitting offline during certain hours. Pointing that out as a category-level observation is one thing. Sweeping every other service into a "manual or worse" bucket is another, and we won't do that.
There are good automatic exchanges out there. Z-tight made the same point below — and they're right too. Our pitch should be about what we build, not about what others lack.
Thanks for the pushback. Better to hear it now than after we'd repeated the same line ten more times.
@Z-tight
Thank you for the kind words and for the honest qualifier — there absolutely are well-run automatic exchanges in the community, and we should be careful not to lump everyone together. The category of services you described — opening/closing hours, dying off and rebranding under new URLs — is a real thing and worth flagging. But that's a specific pattern, not a definition of "everyone else."
Point taken on tone, and credit to examplens for calling it.
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Zapravo većina ljudi pasivno prihvaća sve što im vlasti nude, bez kritičkog razmišljanja, tako da će prihvatiti i CBDC bez previše razmišljanja, kao novotariju koja navodno olakšava plaćanje, a ljudi ionako u zadnje vrijeme plaćaju sve više bez gotovine, samo s karticama.
A Hajduku ni ova lova neće previše pomoći jer njihov problem i nije toliko vezan uz financije koliko uz način vođenja kluba, organizacije kluba... u dok se to ne promijeni neće biti ni rezultata.

Po mojem mišljenju, ali i osobnom iskustvu, diverzifikacija je jako važna i nikada ne treba držati ''sva jaja u istoj košari''.
Osim u crypto trebalo bi ulagati i u fondove poput ETF-ova, možda još i u investicijsko zlato...
Na taj način, kada crypto pada ostalo raste i obrnuto.
Recimo, moj djelomičan izlaz iz crypta prije 5 godina se zaista pokazao kao puni pogodak jer je start up narastao 5 puta a btc 2 puta.
Ako netko ima dobra osobna iskustva i s ETF-ovima, rado ću ih saslušati i razmisliti o dodatnoj diverzifikaciji i ulaganju.
 

AML is not checked in AML Mode swap.

Quite often.

Haha da, Ratimov je to dignuo na skroz drugu razinu. Sjećam se da je čak pravio takve nekakve slavljeničke threadove i kad bi dosegnuo nekakav okrugli broj prijavljenih postova.

I svojoj "karijeri" sam bio aktivan na desetinama foruma (na nekima jesam i dalje) te nigdje drugdje nisam vidio da netko slavi xyz godinama ma forumu ili nešto slično tome. 

I have seen much of those exchanges lately in the forum. Most of them do not even have a rep to answer questions in their ANN thread, chat-bot keep updating AI generated information in their thread.

However, there are few real exchanges also doing well in the forum.

I understand examplens perceptive, but since there's no name calling, DEX are not actually out of the promotion ethics, unless they go extreme than this.

I still remember Mercedes ads of those days - "There is only two type of vehicles; Mercedes and others

If you are using our AML mode, there is no need to contact support.

If you used the standard swap mode and your transaction is flagged as high-risk, your transaction status will change to CONTACT_SUPPORT; clicking on it will display all the ways you can contact us.

If you do not contact us within 72 hours, the transaction will be automatically refunded to the address from which the coins were sent (Sometimes this doesn't happen when we determine that you may no longer have access to that wallet, for example, due to a lack of further activity.)

Hi there! You've been invited to participate in this Request for Feedback (RfF), hence the pings. Due to the inconclusive feedback in Stage 1 & 2, this is currently Stage 3 of the process in order to determine the following question:

RfF Question: Is this an appropriate use of red trust?


Suggested answers, if preferred not to elaborate:

• Yes
• No
• Not interested
• Not sure / phone a friend
• Your answer here

Feedback so far from Stage 1 & 2 based on Vod's DT1 sponsors:


There is also some bonus material at the bottom regarding the neutral tag and doxxing evidence should that tickle your interest 

---

DT voting class as of last weeks data (excluding members who were pinged as part of Stage 1 & 2 + Vod who can't vote for himself).

---

I couldn't care less what the admin thinks about this or previous communication with you, as he doesn't determine forum policy. He is literally just "the tech guy", a guy who knows little to nothing about forum politics and drama over here

You might have been given permission for doxxing by the wrong person in the past, and if so, that permission has since been revoked. Hope that helps clarify things for you. But your doxx of OgNasty and request for personal info on theymos a day prior to that alleged PM (September 07, 2024, 01:01:01 AM) still remains on there, as the policy wasn't implemented retrospectively it seems. Based on the time-frame, I'm guessing it's to do with that. I won't link directly, but it was your first post on there that was since moved to the trash bin so easy to locate.

So looks like it's not just me who can prove that yes you have indeed doxxed, but instead anyone with an account there (fyi trash bin is hidden from public view). So that includes lawyers who sign up to the forum in order to verify it, oopsy daisy

Here's a redacted version, just to provide some context for others. I hope this eliminates any doubt over whether Vod would doxx a member of this community on another forum, or request personal info on another:



Note: I'm aware theymos' real name has been posted on here since 2011, I just don't feel the need to share that here as serves no value.

Bonus question: Do you guys still think Vod is fit for DT after pulling a similar stunt on this forum in 2019 ? Unlike last time, Vod is now doubling down on his doxxing. My opinion is that this is shocking behaviour from a DT member and nothing more than retaliatory feedback.