examplens's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned examplens in the past 7 days

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13711 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9051 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2349 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4251 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2666 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9764 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3201 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (1) 8751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5866 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8224 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1608 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1612 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 5983 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6316 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (36) 1836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2585 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12324 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5930 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6510 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9188 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 672 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4026 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3454 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11027 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2291 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 19311 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 8463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2038 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 958 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 441 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1458 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3542 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1089 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (3) 1350 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +93 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4010 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1782 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5116 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4231 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14811 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2110 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3065 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 11015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1290 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2145 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8943 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2387 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3060 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 7034 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2241 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 5134 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1473 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1834 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1102 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5272 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 7390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1707 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9080 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1514 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 8888 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1132 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2869 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6611 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
96. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1344 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8033 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Bridgoro on November 12, 2025, 11:50:13 AM

We would especially like to thank one of our community members [ examplens ] for his exceptional help. While we faced multiple bans trying to access Reddit, he managed to post and maintain our Bridgoro subreddit there, as well as on Altcoinstalks, which has been a huge help for our visibility.

I am happy to see examplens managed to maintain your bridgoro subreddit. I believe this is the best way to go on Reddit. Just maintain your own subreddit, and try to make incentives for people to post there!

I already joined the community, upvoted a few posts and made a question here about how to get testnet tokens to make a few tests.

Does any of you have some bitcoin testnet coins? Or ethereum.
Thanks

Quote from: examplens on November 13, 2025, 09:46:20 AM

@Darkex.com, is there an official Darkex team member behind this account?
I find it strange that officials leave a referral link in ANN

If you already oblige your users to pass KYC, then you too would have to publicly publish information about who is behind the project, the license under which you are registered, and under which jurisdiction you are registered. I didn't find anything about it on the website.

You refer to the regulations, probably based on that you would lock users' accounts and coins, and at the same time you yourself are illegal

Quote from: Pmalek on November 13, 2025, 09:19:01 AM

Many members of Bitcointalk are reluctant to perform KYC verification even on the most popular centralized exchanges out there. Why? Because ultimately that data gets abused, hacked, leaked, and sold online. It comes back to bite you in the ass. I doubt you will find many people interested in undergoing KYC at your exchange just to receive a small percentage of profit as a cashback bonus or whatever you want to call it.

The only good thing is that they at least emphasized right away that KYC is mandatory.

Hello,

Thank you for your feedback and for raising these points.

The referral link in the ANN is used purely for tracking community engagement and measuring the effectiveness of our campaigns. It does not affect users� funds or access in any way and is not intended for personal gain by team members.

Regarding transparency, we fully understand the importance of disclosing information about the team, registration, and licensing. Our company is officially registered in Dubai, and we are preparing verified corporate documents to provide the community with clear and reliable information. All operations are fully compliant with applicable regulations.

We value the community�s attention to security and compliance and remain committed to building trust through transparency and professional conduct.

Quote from: @Whale on November 06, 2025, 02:27:29 PM

Quote from: examplens on November 02, 2025, 11:46:39 PM

I agree with what Lakai01 says. You abruptly stopped all activities here. I understand that it is necessary to do an evaluation and look at the effects of the promotion here on the forum, but if you plan a long-term presence in crypto gambling, at least the basic activity is desirable.

We're still here!

Yes, we stopped the campaign and several other things at the same time and for the same reason as some of the most famous casinos here.

But we're still here, and we'll even be adding some raffles soon.

Quote from: darxiaomi on November 05, 2025, 06:46:49 PM

A few moments ago i was having some problems reaching the site, some 500 internal error was displayed, i was the only one having the issue? Now seems like its working again.

If the problem persists, please note that the navigation bar in this thread (post 1) contains links to official mirrors! Kiss

Hi Whale!

Are you a VPN-friendly casino if I may ask? There is some confusion here because nothing against VPN is listed in your terms, apart from one more general line which says "24.12.3.2 Any attempt to bypass these restrictions (e.g. multiple accounts, VPNs, temporary emails) may result in disqualification or account suspension"

Does this mean the use of VPN is absolutely forbidden, or does it just mean that only if VPN is used to bypass country restrictions it is forbidden?
My country is not on the forbidden countries list but I often have a VPN turned on (for a multitude of reasons, such as downloading movies and using VPN on other casinos at the same time) and I don't want any future problems. So please let me know

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:47:15 AM

When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.

It's me, losing 13 bets at a row. If I can remember I didn't place anymore bets for a while back then lol.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:35:09 AM

As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before.

I sure hope that he looks and something more other than IP address, as babo pointed out there are many reason why you could share IP address with someone. For example, I am always using VPN when logging on altcointalk, and I am sure many more are doing the same.

Quote from: Emikoyumi on Today at 11:59:41 AM

Quote from: bestcandy on Today at 09:27:30 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:47:15 AM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on Today at 07:57:44 AM

Quote from: Dave1 on Today at 05:54:19 AM

Very different from each individual, I will admit that I do play and bet more when I'm stress out from jobs and other facets of life. But I'm not that addicted, I have self control and regardless of the outcome, at the end of the day, it's me whose going to face it again tomorrow.

This is actually the difference between a gambling addiction and a professional gambler. 'Professional' doesn't mean this is your profession, but the strategy and everything related to gambling should move professionally. Probably gambling addicts don't care whether they are in stress or in relax mode. They will gamble without strategy and without any proper plans; they really don't have self-control, or they don't control themselves.

When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.

Althought, gambling is associated with uncertainty because it's a game of win or loose and as such I don't tink if there is fixed percentage of wine rate but the percentage of win rate may likely depend on the smartness of the person and the ability to make a good forecast using the present performance and strength of the club. However, for one to be consider a professional gambler the percentage of winning should be at least between 45% to 70%.

Just having intelligence is not enough. If it is not in your luck you won�t win even if you play well. This has happened to me many times. I have played on Betpanda.io several times and made a good amount of profit from there as well. Gambling is very uncertain. If you don�t get good cards in hand, no matter how well you try to play you would not be able to win. And on betting sites choosing strong teams often increases your chances of winning. You can play these on Betpanda.io too.

In many other betting sites, is still same, or almost same as no difference is still known. The game of gambling is fix in that way and knowledge can not almost comprehend it, as it is see as something that can come and can not, if it is for it will be, so better still, the game is typically a lucky one and this is something we need to understand, whether on Betpanda.io too, so it is up to you to understand and not to over expect too much.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:55:55 AM

Quote from: s1lverbox on Today at 06:38:46 AM

As of now its slow and site is up for 2 weeks.

I welcome the idea, any action against scams is a good thing.
However, I have to ask. Considering the site is only two weeks old, how did it make a result so quickly and report $3,855,000 Total Amount Recovered? Where can we see cases in which some amount was recovered?

You have a typo in the subject, frozen, not frzoen

Each claim was added manually based on report from X for example. If you open reclaimr.info and move to claim tracker you will be presented with already added claims. Some can have just x.com post as source , some will have tx id as source. End game is to add and update when there is something to update.

With frozen funds there is option of recovery while with rug and scams funds are marked as LOST.
Why there is over 122m already reported? This report : https://reclaimr.info/claim-tracker#claim=-Od8jxT0VCs85i_K7qIo is done for latest balancer 100m loss due to hacking. Most important is that all reported funds are stay as REPORTED regardless if recovered or not. RECOVERED shows only when this happens and post is updated with this info.

If you go to claim tracker website you can see for example ThEWhiteWhale case where he got his money back and openly updated the case. That way 3m was recovered and marked. If you follow update link or share button you can see post where OP saying he got his money back.

Please do not consider this site as some kind tracker which helps recovering funds in any way. Its purely directory like website where even small lost funds can be seen by community.

Title has been fixed. Thanks for the heads up.

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 12:14:50 PM

It is up to you to say whatever you want. As DS quoted some posts and pointed out, they do not add a tag only for simple rule violations. They are not required to declare their alternative accounts if it is not participate in signature campaigns or do not violate the major rules. Additionally, the admin does not apply the red dot solely based on a single IP connection. Each time you post on the forum, the post includes your IP address, and you can see that under your post in the bottom right corner.

If you use Tor or a VPN, your IP address would be different each session (At least each day). However, when your IP address matches every day you post, it is clear that you are using alternative accounts. I am making this assumption based on my understanding. examplens is Senator there while I am just a Junior Mod, and he knows more information.

ah if it is considered on a daily basis then it is not a problem
I thought it was used on a long-term basis, in this case it is appropriate

if user x matches ip address with user y TODAY then it makes sense
if it is considered for a long time then no, since the IPs of the exit nodes are always the same

in any case you have to stay calm, I didn't say something banal or here we use same approach.. but we dont use because many use TOR

Quote from: babo on Today at 08:57:10 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:35:09 AM

As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before. It is not allowed to have more than one independent account on this forum. You can have more than one, but they must be clearly linked, and only one has the right to participate in campaigns, awards, contests, etc.
The search function there is quite unusable, so it is a bit complicated to find a direct quote for these claims by the admin.

It's a pretty stupid decision for many reasons.
many connect from tor, and from tor you often have the same exit nodes, so it makes no sense to rely on the ip
same, they could use the VPN, so same story

as a basis for associating accounts it is a very stupid system
how stupid it is that he decided to put cloud flare in front, boasting about a ddos that doesn't exist

It is up to you to say whatever you want. As DS quoted some posts and pointed out, they do not add a tag only for simple rule violations. They are not required to declare their alternative accounts if it is not participate in signature campaigns or do not violate the major rules. Additionally, the admin does not apply the red dot solely based on a single IP connection. Each time you post on the forum, the post includes your IP address, and you can see that under your post in the bottom right corner.

If you use Tor or a VPN, your IP address would be different each session (At least each day). However, when your IP address matches every day you post, it is clear that you are using alternative accounts. I am making this assumption based on my understanding. examplens is Senator there while I am just a Junior Mod, and he knows more information.

Quote from: examplens on October 29, 2025, 02:44:50 PM

Don't look at this only and exclusively from the gambler's point of view. There is a large number of sports fans who are not at all interested in betting in any sense, but follow sports only for enjoyment.

I know a lot of people who are regulars at the stadiums, follow every game of their favorite club, without ever opening a single bet. I also know those who don't even know all the rules of football, but are regulars in betting

If sports betting were to be abolished, gamblers would find their new place, and not much would change.
So, there is nothing to worry about.

Yeah I have alot of friends too who are not into gambling and don't find it interesting too, I feel their are always going to be people that gamble and those that don't,, these relationship is always balanced out, i don't feel their is going to be any major changes in the nearest future, though the number of new people gambling has been on a steady increase on a daily basis, we have to also note that others are also quitting gambling, so their is al kinetic relationship between them and going to continue for a very long time.

Quote from: bestcandy on Today at 09:27:30 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:47:15 AM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on Today at 07:57:44 AM

Quote from: Dave1 on Today at 05:54:19 AM

Very different from each individual, I will admit that I do play and bet more when I'm stress out from jobs and other facets of life. But I'm not that addicted, I have self control and regardless of the outcome, at the end of the day, it's me whose going to face it again tomorrow.

This is actually the difference between a gambling addiction and a professional gambler. 'Professional' doesn't mean this is your profession, but the strategy and everything related to gambling should move professionally. Probably gambling addicts don't care whether they are in stress or in relax mode. They will gamble without strategy and without any proper plans; they really don't have self-control, or they don't control themselves.

When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.

Althought, gambling is associated with uncertainty because it's a game of win or loose and as such I don't tink if there is fixed percentage of wine rate but the percentage of win rate may likely depend on the smartness of the person and the ability to make a good forecast using the present performance and strength of the club. However, for one to be consider a professional gambler the percentage of winning should be at least between 45% to 70%.

Just having intelligence is not enough. If it is not in your luck you won�t win even if you play well. This has happened to me many times. I have played on Betpanda.io several times and made a good amount of profit from there as well. Gambling is very uncertain. If you don�t get good cards in hand, no matter how well you try to play you would not be able to win. And on betting sites choosing strong teams often increases your chances of winning. You can play these on Betpanda.io too.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:27:34 AM

Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on Today at 08:49:43 AM

There are two more as far as I can see: ranochigo and NeuroticFish. Darkstar_ won't remove the tag because he's been AWOL for long, and ranochigo hasn't been very active lately. If you want the tags of people who remain active to change, I don't know why you keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result.

Nothing will happen here, he just risks getting more 'spammer' tags. I don't know what kind of change he's talking about or if he's corrected his posts here, but the last few pages of his post history are mostly useless spam in the gambling discussions section.

Given that romero121 is making a request in this thread to remove tags while suggesting a review of his posts, it seems that he doesn't even understand what spam is.

Maybe in most of the users view, I may be a spammer. My personal view, forum is for discussion and knowledge sharing. I have put forward my views and maybe that can be wrong in someone's view. So, it's upto them and even in our forum everything is taking place with group formation. Even merits are shared within them and person who try their best too doesn't get rewarded for what they deserve. I made a thread and seeked users to participate in the conversation. Maybe the thread and contents were spam, JollyGood is one among to receive the DM. He should've responded or he should have notified me, this isn't the way to make users get into discussion. What he does, he keeps finding connected accounts to receive merits. What better he had done to the forum. So, everyone are for some purpose.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:54:56 AM

A sto da ne, rekao bih solidna odluka? Za relativno mali novac, mozes dobiti prilicnu dominaciju na forumu. Gledam mega threade u gambling discussion, cisto sumnjam da to bilo ko cita i da nekog interesuje, mozda zadnjih par postova se koristi, tek toliko da se ima na osnovu cega pisati reply + quote jos bolje. Kad vec malo ko cita, a opet su poseceni threads, makar slika Betpanda signature da dominira.
Neki mladji Member rank clanovi ce se mozda truditi da upadnu u oko menadzeru, pa jednog dana mogu imati vise sansi u boljoj kampanji sa boljom isplatom, opet plus.
Na kraju, signature je jednako vidljiv, bez obzira dolazi li od member rank ili legendary.

Ja bi ipak rekao da je potpis vidljiviji ako ga nosi korisnik koji pi�e u "normalnim" threadovima gdje netko stvarno i čita to �to pi�e. Ako korisnik samo �tanca postove u spam threadovima, onda nema ba� neke svrhe. Ali opet, s druge strane je super �to se daje prilika ni�im rangovima da sudjeluju u kampanji i zarade ne�to BTC-a. Samo pitanje je koliko trenutno ima stvarnih Member korisnika, a koliko su samo alt računi postojećih korisnika.

Quote from: babo on Today at 08:57:10 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:35:09 AM

As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before. It is not allowed to have more than one independent account on this forum. You can have more than one, but they must be clearly linked, and only one has the right to participate in campaigns, awards, contests, etc.
The search function there is quite unusable, so it is a bit complicated to find a direct quote for these claims by the admin.

It's a pretty stupid decision for many reasons.
many connect from tor, and from tor you often have the same exit nodes, so it makes no sense to rely on the ip
same, they could use the VPN, so same story

as a basis for associating accounts it is a very stupid system
how stupid it is that he decided to put cloud flare in front, boasting about a ddos that doesn't exist

FYI:

here are some the direct quotes, one from admin, one from Freemind.

Quote from: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=321705.msg1925445#msg1925445

Any user who does not comply with the rules (at least the strictest ones, such as not cheating in signature campaigns) will be flagged and added to the zoom group without exception.

Quote from: Freemind link=https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=329747.msg1764898#msg1764898

Users are not required to declare multiple accounts, but if they are found to be violating forum rules by using multiple accounts or participating in signature campaigns, for example, they will receive a red dot for the reasons mentioned above. You might be wondering, if they're not required to declare their accounts, why do they receive a red dot? It's simply to ensure that all users have the same opportunities.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:47:15 AM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on Today at 07:57:44 AM

Quote from: Dave1 on Today at 05:54:19 AM

Very different from each individual, I will admit that I do play and bet more when I'm stress out from jobs and other facets of life. But I'm not that addicted, I have self control and regardless of the outcome, at the end of the day, it's me whose going to face it again tomorrow.

This is actually the difference between a gambling addiction and a professional gambler. 'Professional' doesn't mean this is your profession, but the strategy and everything related to gambling should move professionally. Probably gambling addicts don't care whether they are in stress or in relax mode. They will gamble without strategy and without any proper plans; they really don't have self-control, or they don't control themselves.

When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.

Althought, gambling is associated with uncertainty because it's a game of win or loose and as such I don't tink if there is fixed percentage of wine rate but the percentage of win rate may likely depend on the smartness of the person and the ability to make a good forecast using the present performance and strength of the club. However, for one to be consider a professional gambler the percentage of winning should be at least between 45% to 70%.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:13:15 AM

The final conclusion is that it is impossible to blame anyone in this case, and the end user bears the greatest damage.

This is what happens when some services treat fungible coins as non-fungible. Governments wouldn't allow this to happen to their fiat money, as it destroys trust in the currency. Which is exactly the reason they apply it to crypto.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:35:09 AM

As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before. It is not allowed to have more than one independent account on this forum. You can have more than one, but they must be clearly linked, and only one has the right to participate in campaigns, awards, contests, etc.
The search function there is quite unusable, so it is a bit complicated to find a direct quote for these claims by the admin.

It's a pretty stupid decision for many reasons.
many connect from tor, and from tor you often have the same exit nodes, so it makes no sense to rely on the ip
same, they could use the VPN, so same story

as a basis for associating accounts it is a very stupid system
how stupid it is that he decided to put cloud flare in front, boasting about a ddos that doesn't exist

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:08:26 PM

From what I see now on the Bridgoro platform, 1 BRGX = 1 USD. Is that the correct rate?
Also, if the BRGX token is only and exclusively for internal use, I assume that this means that its rate will not change, because it will not be exposed to external influence and pump/dump risk?

Correct.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:08:26 PM

btw. What exactly is the reason for this update, and setting the minimum exchange amount to $60

Quote

Exchange Features
Minimum exchange amount: ~$60 (USD equivalent)[UPDATED]

The reason is related to the Dead Wallet Amount. If the price of crypto assets drops significantly, as it did on October 10, funds may get stuck because the remaining balance might be lower than the required network fee. During such price fluctuations, network fees can rise sharply, making small amounts effectively unspendable.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:16:54 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:39:39 AM

Quote from: logfiles on November 10, 2025, 11:59:18 PM

Is there anybody else experiencing a painfully slow loading time when trying to access the sportsbook section?
My internet is pretty good right now, and I have tried through different browsers, but the part where the games and the odds are supposed to be displaced is just blank.

I just checked it now to see. Loading the main page and logging in is fast. So is navigating the home page. When I click on the sports section, it does slow down a bit. For a few seconds I only see the blue background before the page loads and displays content. It's not painfully slow on my end but it could be faster. It's not the first sportsbook that I have seen that is a bit slower, though, considering the amount of events and how much information is available on-page.

I just wanted to confirm the same thing based on my experience with Betpanda yesterday. I just checked, and it seems to be working within normal limits for the site's loading speed (sportsbet section). Maybe they improved something in the meantime.

Of course, it would be desirable if the site would speed up a bit, but it seems to me that it is currently common what we see on all similar platforms. Some are even significantly slower to load.

betpandacasino.io is their official mirror. You can try out the site when the main has issues.

Hi Bitcointalkers,

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to this community for being the very first to support us from the very beginning.
It's truly inspiring to see how the Bitcointalk community has stepped up to help our project, something we deeply value and respect.

As many of you know, our project is fully self-funded, so we don't have a large marketing budget.
Yet, thanks to the dedication and efforts of some of our community members, we have been able to bring more attention to what we are building.
We strongly believe that every contribution deserves recognition and reward.

We are confident that our project will achieve success sooner or later and when that happens, we will make sure to show our appreciation properly.
Believe us, the rewards won't just be a few hundred dollars. We have already created a list of those who have supported us and saved their contact information for future communication.

We would especially like to thank one of our community members [ examplens ] for his exceptional help. While we faced multiple bans trying to access Reddit, he managed to post and maintain our Bridgoro subreddit there, as well as on Altcoinstalks, which has been a huge help for our visibility.

This message carries no hidden meaning, we simply wanted to express our gratitude and confirm in writing that your support won't be forgotten.

Thank you, Bitcointalk, for being with us from the start.

Quote from: dkbit98 on November 11, 2025, 08:10:03 PM

I will check it out and search for any potential mistakes in document.
Whitepaper is usually made for coins, but there is nothing wrong in having whitepaper made for exchange.

That would be great. We are still new to this, so we would really appreciate any suggestions you have regarding the Whitepaper.

Quote from: dkbit98 on November 11, 2025, 08:10:03 PM

PS
Good luck with upcoming new Beta Test starting in few days, I think it should start in 4 days.
Just try not to write anything controversial on Telegram this time Wink

Yeah, that small mistake happened because of crunch time. We published the post on November 10 and accidentally mentioned 4 days instead of 5 before the Beta launch. It's already fixed in our post.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:09:11 AM

The exchange will also issue an in-app token called BRGX. These BRGX tokens will be used as rewards for users who participate in specific tasks and reach certain achievements.
The whitepaper doesn't go into specifics about what kind of tasks there will be. It does mention that there will be easy ones like clicking a claim button and repeatable daily, weekly, monthly, and custom activities. BRGX tokens will also be used as referral rewards for inviting new users to the exchange.

Thanks a lot for pointing that out. We will update the Whitepaper soon with more details about the internal token and clearly explain the task structure and differences.

Just to clarify your question about the token:
BRGX is purely an in-app token used inside the Bridgoro platform. It's not a blockchain-based crypto token, it exists only within the exchange environment and serves as a reward unit for:

completing tasks
inviting new users (referral rewards)
and earning commissions for creating sell offers (after the fee-free period ends)

BRGX can only be used within the Bridgoro exchange and can be withdrawn exclusively inside the Bridgoro exchange.

Quote from: Bigjoe158 on Today at 01:03:40 PM

Yes,Slot will not be fired from his job as the manager of Liverpool because he has achieved something that is last season but will be under pressure next season. Slot spent huge during the last transfer window and with that kind of spending, the Liverpool owners expect results this season or next season. Although the season is still fresh but the daggers will be out next season.

I am fairly confident Slot will not be sacked this season. His contract expires at the end of the 2027 season therefore there is time, he could even sign a contract extension if results improve.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:30:27 PM

Everyone immediately starts an argument about how much was spent, and it very rarely happens that investing a lot of money does not bring results in the short term. PSG is perhaps the best example of this.
As for Liverpool, it is more striking that everything seems incompatible. It seems that they bought players whose characteristics are not what the team needed, now it looks quite uncontrolled. I think that Slot does not have the capacity to do what is required of him on paper. These wins against Real are especially symptomatic, which leads him to believe that he has solved the problem, and it is enough for his team to go on the field.

They beat Real Madrid but lose to Manchester City. I think Liverpool did not accept that (as Premier League champions) all the teams will be fighting against them in a more determined manner than last season. Time could prove me wrong but at the moment it seems as though Slot did not recruit well.

Of the recent purchases, Ekitike seems to a player that looks fantastic on the ball. Watching any player, especially a striker running at players and getting past them to create a chance is very exciting. The Isak saga that eventually brought him to Liverpool for �125 million did not help either.

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 05:36:43 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:01:31 AM

Quote from: changeum on November 09, 2025, 11:07:00 AM

Hello, we currently don't have KYC checks and we guarantee refunds for now. However, I can't speak for the future; if any changes occur, all users will be notified in advance. Currently, we only have AML verification for all transactions. Liquidity is replenished with our own funds.

Does this mean that every incoming transaction is checked by AML, and in the case of too many risky coins, you must return the coin to the sender?
AML score is a necessary evil and in the end, we have to accept it. Here is a very specific case, which could be a warning to you about accepting coins with a bad AML score https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563782.0

Interesting situation (how did I miss it?), it happens with platforms that have a limited reserve of coins. I will test Changeum.io to see the source of the coins and whether they use income inputs directly in other transactions or not.

Very interesting.

AML checks are indeed here to stay. Although this situation involves only altcoins, I see lots of people talking about bitcoin fungibility when sending coins to exchanges. But I never see such situation when the user receives coins from exchanges... Fungibility means nothing in this situation...

I guess all this idea of fungibility really doesn't apply to stolen funds, specially when we are dealing with altcoins. Actually, fungibility is already questionable even for bitcoin. AML checks are here to stay.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:01:31 AM

Quote from: changeum on November 09, 2025, 11:07:00 AM

Hello, we currently don't have KYC checks and we guarantee refunds for now. However, I can't speak for the future; if any changes occur, all users will be notified in advance. Currently, we only have AML verification for all transactions. Liquidity is replenished with our own funds.

Does this mean that every incoming transaction is checked by AML, and in the case of too many risky coins, you must return the coin to the sender?
AML score is a necessary evil and in the end, we have to accept it. Here is a very specific case, which could be a warning to you about accepting coins with a bad AML score https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563782.0

Interesting situation (how did I miss it?), it happens with platforms that have a limited reserve of coins. I will test Changeum.io to see the source of the coins and whether they use income inputs directly in other transactions or not.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:26:15 PM

Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 04:45:48 AM

They are called Head Lines and you can find them on the left side of the soccer icon.

Headlines under sports betting exactly.
Is this something new on Betpanda? Or maybe I just haven't been paying attention until now.
Currently, there is only Tesla stuff. I assume that there will be an upgrade here and more diverse options.

Could it be that Tesla bought the head line space to publish news only related to them. It sounds funny, but Betpanda can still sell out such space for strategic advertisement by pushing only the positive news about the project.

Well, let's just believe that those Tesla news are just placeholder news, diverse news will be punished there in due time.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:12:02 PM

Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.

Not just you mate, but the reality is that we are all heading towards centralization and just like bitcoin adoptions via central authorities in form of ETFs positions in bitcoin have drive us towards centralization if not now but in the near future we all be beating good bye to decentralization.

Cryptocurrency casinos have taken the same direction since the need to meet licensing requirements have put them in a position that mandated them to take verification documents from their customers in form of kyc.

Quote from: iv4n on Today at 06:58:54 PM

~
It's not only you Examplens... at first I thought it had something with fiat, but after reading other comments I thought there's something more, and then I saw your comment. When they grow big enough, they need to adopt...

As I understood, Sportsbet will go fully legit... so they will accept crypto if all the laws & regulations allow it. I've read quite a few articles about that stuff... long story short, it says that all big players (casinos & other crypto platforms) are under serious pressure. The YOLO team decided to go fully legal, while some other casinos chose a different way...

In any case, it wouldn't surprise me if BC ends up becoming a crypto casino with mandatory KYC.

Unfortunately the way the trend is right now, the players who don't want to submit personal information for KYC will have to play only on casinos without licence with high probability of rigged games.

Sadly that is trend in whole world and not just in gambling industry.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:00:21 PM

~

evo i tag; ovcijisir, katanic97, dkbit98, Rikafip Wink

Hvala ti na tagu Examplens, na zalost ovaj put nisam se uspio prijaviti na vrijeme, ali jako cijenim dobru namjeru

Quote from: ovcijisir on Today at 04:57:30 PM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:12:02 PM

~
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.

I agree that something funny is going on, as I had two KYC requests in last few months - one from bc.game and other from sportsbet.io.

Also in mean time sportsbet made decision to cease operations involving crypto due to regulations.

It seems that from one side big corporations invest in crypto, and from other side regular users are victims of regulations and potential privacy issues.

It's not only you Examplens... at first I thought it had something with fiat, but after reading other comments I thought there's something more, and then I saw your comment. When they grow big enough, they need to adopt...

As I understood, Sportsbet will go fully legit... so they will accept crypto if all the laws & regulations allow it. I've read quite a few articles about that stuff... long story short, it says that all big players (casinos & other crypto platforms) are under serious pressure. The YOLO team decided to go fully legal, while some other casinos chose a different way...

In any case, it wouldn't surprise me if BC ends up becoming a crypto casino with mandatory KYC.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:12:02 PM

~
Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.

I agree that something funny is going on, as I had two KYC requests in last few months - one from bc.game and other from sportsbet.io.

Also in mean time sportsbet made decision to cease operations involving crypto due to regulations.

It seems that from one side big corporations invest in crypto, and from other side regular users are victims of regulations and potential privacy issues.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:12:02 PM

Quote from: ovcijisir on Today at 09:24:23 AM

Quote from: noormcs5 on November 09, 2025, 09:52:16 AM

Quote from: ovcijisir on November 09, 2025, 07:50:18 AM

I am not sure that the only reason why KYC is triggered is only because withdrawal is in fiat.

I say that because one week ago I tried to make crypto withdrawal in TON in equivalent of 20 USD and somehow it triggered KYC.

I have used BC.game for years and until one week ago they never asked for KYC. I can't figure out what triggered it, because I didn't have any unusual activity lately and the amount was pretty small.

Well most of the users are being asked for KYC these days. I don't think it has anything to do with unusual activity, and no casino site will trigger a manual KYC check on such small withdrawals. I guess there is some random KYC checking and you account comes into that random checking and asking for the KYC.

I guess it makes sense if it was just random and not triggered by some action. I also don't know if they changed their KYC policies lately, I haven't got any notification on e-mail but it could also be one of possible reasons.

Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.

Dear members of this forum i request everyone not use bc game especially in india they are doing scams thousands of players are begging for their own money you can see spams full of withdrawal and deposit issue on discord , trustpoilt even any one need personally proof he/she can quote me here i will provide them proof how shamelessly they are doing scams ,i boycott bc gam

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:26:15 PM

Is this something new on Betpanda? Or maybe I just haven't been paying attention until now.

I have never been paying attention to this but I guess this icon was there all the time lol.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:12:02 PM

Is it just me, or are we slowly sliding towards all casinos having mandatory KYC?
A few years ago, KYC & crypto casinos were very rare discussions at all, and they happened mostly only in critical situations. Nowadays, as far as I can see, it's a real rarity to find a KYC-free (truly free) casino.
Something very similar happened with CEX, now we are where we are.

It's not just you and It's pretty much the standard already these days sadly. World governments kept applying pressure on various crypto gambling sites due to which almost all of them have become KYC hungry in recent times.

BC.Game is one of the hungriest among them thanks to which their unethical tactics are visible to everyone. They aren't scammers, but they will use KYC as a tool to halt withdrawals unethically whenever they feel like it.

Quote from: examplens on November 08, 2025, 11:25:18 AM

Quote from: REDice on November 08, 2025, 11:12:49 AM

what advice for me i had a web3 staking platform for collateral? token i had. this valid for collateral?

No.

When a lender lends money, he does not want to buy someone's business. He borrows money to get interest + his money back at the end of the agreement. If the lender can't sell your platform easily and cover the entire deal, the main amount + interest, they won't consider it as collateral.
Even if the platform is profitable, you certainly wouldn't get anywhere near the amount you think it's worth.
Otherwise, people would massively create similar platforms and tokens and sell them in this way.

what rank need to qualify to get loan here? i see most here is legenday to to qualify? JR. member not ?

Quote from: examplens on November 06, 2025, 12:58:36 PM

Unfortunately, here is a much more serious case related to another partner, Exolix. It is about $11k taken, where Exolix admitted his guilt.
I don't know how your guarantee system works, but it would be good if you could influence this to be resolved positively.
EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED � $11,000

Sorry for the delay. Was busy doing the WizardSwap meetup in Gibraltar. We even paid using Lightning! See video: https://x.com/OrangeFren/status/1986867927694328175

I got in touch with Exolix, the confirmed to us that this user was not one of our own so our guarantee doesn't apply. That said, if a similar situation happened to one of our users I strongly suspect we would apply the insurance. After all Exolix is fully at fault here (they even say so themselves!).

Quote from: examplens on November 07, 2025, 05:41:46 PM

Definitivno je dosegnut zenit sa ovim meme tokenima i ako je neko i sumnjao, ovakve stvari su signali da je alt sezona gotova i lagano ide ka ciscenju racuna.
Aca Lukas ima svoj $LUKAS token (neverovatno mi je da ovo uopste pisem) i njegovo objasnjavanje je prava slika sta predstvaljaju ove stvari.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQrMtXoiF48/?igsh=aXgwMms0ejA0dXll

Aca je rekao da ima tu prevara, ali on to nece da radi i nece nigde da bezi... nema gde, mora da peva. "Prakticno on investira vo bezbedna rabota", rekao Boki 13. Isti taj je 30 sekundi pre toga reako: "Jebes me na suvo ako ista razumem". Kakav razgovor "na nivou", sto bi rekao Zika Pavlovic.

Quote from: examplens on November 08, 2025, 11:15:30 AM

Evo i nije lose, zar ne?

Pa to je odlicna cena... cak je i malo jaci od dinara. Ali valjda je poenta da svaki njegov fan za 1k dinara moze da kupi cak hiljadu tokena covece.
Naravno da sam morao da pogledam sajt... sta su oni sve napisali tamo.

Quote from: Owena on November 08, 2025, 07:35:56 PM

Ali ne lezi vra�e, gos'n Lukas na sajtu ima da prodaje i T-SHIRTS i JACKETS i HOODIES tako ukoliko ne kupi� token mo�e� da se obuče� Cheesy

A za koju godinu kad bude video kako posao ide ima da brendira i svoje lonce i poklopce kao i namestaj naravno. Cheesy

Mislim da su mnogo zanimljiviji slotovi & ruleti koji dolaze uskoro.

Quote from: examplens on November 06, 2025, 11:34:07 AM

I used TalkSearch a little, I would suggest two improvements if possible. It is related to the search result.
For example, what I miss is the sorting of search results by creation date and by the date of the last post in the topic. I'm not sure how the algorithm decides the order of the prints, but it seems that they are thrown randomly.

Also, if possible, separate or at least mark archived or locked threads. It took me a long time to search and check each link, and many were just archived or locked, which was useless to me.

I hope to finally add vector embedding search within the next few days. It would require a complete re-index though since I have to add new fields.

Also the second request might be a good idea. I return the entire post data to the frontend anyway so it would be possible to do such a thing.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13696 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9019 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2340 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4230 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2662 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9748 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4368 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (1) 8727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5856 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 8217 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1607 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1599 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 5931 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6312 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (36) 1836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2566 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12272 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5928 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6510 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6424 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3128 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9176 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 672 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3435 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11009 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11116 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2286 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 19273 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2832 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 8407 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2037 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 958 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 440 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1452 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1086 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (3) 1349 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6316 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +92 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3987 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1760 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2114 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5103 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14771 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2099 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3061 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 11015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2145 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1949 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8933 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3304 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2382 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3056 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 7026 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19267 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2237 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2389 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5003 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 5130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1470 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1832 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1102 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5263 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 7378 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1705 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9073 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1501 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 8849 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1126 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2865 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6590 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
96. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1340 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8033 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: examplens on October 29, 2025, 02:18:26 PM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on October 28, 2025, 07:50:48 PM

But to me it doesn't make sense to pay a salary in Bitcoin when evaluate the value in stablecoins or fiat. Though this considers Bitcoin adoption, it doesn't mean the receiver will hold that Bitcoin.

Imagine how much more complicated it would be to pay without Bitcoin.
Would signature campaigns as such appeal at all if there were only fiat payment?
Also, holding is not the most important thing in Bitcoin adoption, it's more about flow and transfer between different entities.

Quote from: The Cryptovator on October 28, 2025, 07:50:48 PM

Due to volatility, the receiver would lose the value of Bitcoin unless he held it. So he/she is obliged to sell his/her Bitcoin to cover the family expenses. So Bitcoin payment isn't very useful for him.

Due to volatility, the value of the transaction is agreed in fiat, and Bitcoin is only used for easier transfer. Just as a user can lose by holding Bitcoin, they can also profit from its value increasing.

I received weekly payouts in bitcoin since 2018. I can see it is really amazing, and the volatility is not a problem at all. And I have hold most of what I received so far, and I have spent about 20-30% of it only (in bull markets ofc)

I have received literally thousands and thousands dollars in BTC in this forum and in other places in the internet (as a blog writer, as a developer, as a bounty hunter, etc) and I always received money in btc. I can simple say it is amazing, and the volatility is not a problem, neither having to evaluate the value in fiat. This simple doesn`t matter.

Bitcoin is an amazing payment method.