Only that user faced the delay, I know there could be some network related delay or something else. I also swapped to XMR on many exchanges and it's normal to wait for confirmations when it's about XMR. @yugenz can you tell us that what kind of delay you faced? The transaction was executed on exchange's end or it wasn't? Sometimes XMR network can take time for confirmations and that can be a reason for such delay.

Haha da, taj njihov pidgin je bas cirkus. Ali mislim da su ga uglavnom ranije forsirali, sad vidim da su se prebacili na engleski.

Osim njih, mislim da jos jedino Indijci koriste engleski u svom lokalnom boardu. Koliko se sjecam, jedan njihov clan je u onom mom threadu na meti obrazlozio to time sto oni imaju pun kurac jezika, a posto je engleski jedan od sluzbenih, to im je bilo najprakticnije.

I would change the code before asking for a quote to the same verification system that is asked for to get a valid session through Tor where you have to choose the three codes out of nine that look like the one they show you.

Right, it's not new — Z-tight is correct, it's been there from the start. The post was just a reminder: as MarryWithBTC's reply showed, not everyone knew about it, and some users were still worrying about sending the exact amount. Thanks for confirming it from your own swaps.

No, it is not a new feature, it has always existed on DEX.fo, for as far as i can remember. Your experience is also right, because just like you, in many of my swaps, i have not sent the exact amount in my order and i don't worry about it, because the system would simply recalculate it and just process the actual amount that i sent

Well it run for many months already, people still discussing on things that have don't clear answer.

Maybe its good to move on from that for awhile, because for now it seems that they don't have plans to help their token to raise. So its no sense to talk about that here, unless they post new big updates which could possibly help their token.

Actually no one notice with those changes they made, since I think they didn't post anything about it on their social channels.

This section look completely different than it was before. I think they also have changed font for a list of what they offer (left side). They have redesigned all BetFury original game icons. Not really sure about chat, as I dont remember if they had so many smiles for posting. Not a frequent user also, but previous design looked way different, that is for sure. That is how page looked some time ago.

If you hadn't posted about it, it would’ve taken me forever to notice that Betfury changed their website design, since I rarely log in there. I checked out the new look and barely noticed any difference. The color palette changed slightly, but everything else is exactly the same. Honestly, if you hadn't pointed it out, I probably wouldn't have even noticed — the changes are that minor.

If you hadn't posted about it, it would’ve taken me forever to notice that Betfury changed their website design, since I rarely log in there. I checked out the new look and barely noticed any difference. The color palette changed slightly, but everything else is exactly the same. Honestly, if you hadn't pointed it out, I probably wouldn't have even noticed—the changes are that minor.

Not for two months instead of discussing casino, but all the time people discuss BFG token and how useless it is, and what BetFury should do to change that situation

Yesterday BetFury redesigned their page, but nobody seems to notice that or are lazy to tell that. Dont know about you guys, but I dont like that blackish style. Either I am used to their old style, or black-red-white-grey style looked better than black-grey-golden. I havent checked yet how page would look on a sunny day or when direct light hits the screen. Guess it not going to be good. Maybe that is just an effect of something new, but seems that page has started to work and load everything faster.

Covjek od principa. 


S obzirom da im je ovo posao i cesto glavni izvor prihoda, covjek bi pomislio da bi takvi trebali najozbiljnije pristupati sig kampanjama i samom forumu. Ali kao sto vidimo, to uglavnom nije slucaj.


Rusi jesu godinama bili najbrojniji, do pojave nigerijskog boarda koji je poceo kotiti nove clanove nenormalnom brzinom (odokativnom metodom rekao bih da su pola njihovog boarda altovi). Ali da, samo 1 sig banan clan na skoro njih 300 aktivnih je cudo. Moguce da puno njih uopce ne izlazi iz svog lokalnog boarda ili to radi minimalno, pa onda i nisu meta.

My tools are getting famous, it is inspiring other websites. 

Same design, same name, same units, same fiat currencies.

Look @examplens, one more!

Yes, this is roughly the 5^th time I have complained, and nothing has changed. The exchange speed is still ridiculously slow (48 hours?), and I still no response / support from the team.

The output coin was XMR, and I still don't see any technical reason why the delay would be any longer than 1 hour, much less 48 hours. Other exchangers work without this much delay.

I know I am the only one swapping to XMR because it says so on the website. The first exchange I see "Order will be filled shortly..." and subsequent ones I see "Position in Queue: 1", "Position in Queue: 2"

bitz.io username: kukuku
Slot number: 33

---

USERNAME	SLOT	RANK	REG DATE	POST
......................................	......	....................	................................	.........
Smartprofit	01	Legendary	August 21, 2017	check
xandry	02	Legendary	September 29, 2014	check
mv1986	03	Legendary	February 09, 2014	check
knuckey	04	Sr. Member	June 16, 2015	check
DabsPoorVersion	05	Sr. Member	April 01, 2017	check
hopenotlate	07	Legendary	December 03, 2013	check
Itz-prisigold	08	Sr. Member	October 02, 2025	check
inearth	10	Member	October 02, 2024	check
jcojci	11	Full Member	August 23, 2016	check
UserU	12	Hero Member	December 17, 2017	check
lodocus	17	Sr. Member	April 16, 2025	check
Lucano	18	Hero Member	April 16, 2013	check
Barcode_	19	Hero Member	February 21, 2016	check
tiCeR	20	Legendary	July 10, 2011	check
Pandorak	21	Hero Member	January 24, 2023	check
demonica	22	Full Member	February 27, 2020	check
Debbiecrypto	23	Member	February 06, 2024	check
Road21Bitcoin	24	Copper Member	December 30, 2019	check
Woodie	25	Hero Member	October 18, 2016	check
Improved	26	Member	March 06, 2015	check
Pmalek	27	Legendary	May 05, 2013	check
m2017	29	Legendary	November 09, 2017	check
examplens	31	Legendary	April 13, 2014	check
VashaUdacha777	32	Full Member	May 17, 2018	check
rbynxx	34	Hero Member	October 27, 2017	check
Dip69	35	Member	September 10, 2024	check
RTX-G53	37	Member	November 23, 2023	check
Leahized	38	Sr. Member	September 20, 2023	check
Unknown Op	39	Hero Member	November 01, 2022	check

Available Slots (11): 06, 09, 13, 14, 15, 16, 28, 30, 33, 36, 40

---

Just a reminder: this is just scraped data, not a final decision. The manager can still move or reassign the slots based on their rules. This is just for reference. Also, since it's an automated scrape, sometimes error or bug can happen, just double check it. scrapped using @btalkgamesbot

Fair question, and SamReomo and examplens have already covered most of it. The main focus is getting Fast & White stable around the clock, along with ongoing improvements to the code behind the service. The full API and the affiliate program are also in development — the current API is read-only for now, but that's not where it ends. And yes, we see the affiliate program the same way bitmover does, so it's definitely part of the plan.

No dates for any of it — we'd rather announce things when they're actually live. Thanks for the support and the good wishes!

---

📢 Follow our Telegram channel

We post crypto news there, duplicate all announcements, and let you know right away when Fast & White is switched on or off: t.me/dexfo_en

🔄 Reminder: automatic recalculation

If the amount you send doesn't match your order, there's no need to create a new one. For example, you create an order for 0.5 BTC but send 0.55 or 0.45 BTC — the system automatically recalculates the order for the amount actually received.

da es von Lafu leider für die monate juli, august und september keine updates gab, aber dieses thema doch aktuell bleiben sollte, möchte ich ihn etwas unter die arme greifen und euch wenigstens das update für den monat oktober veröffentlichen
im oktober waren 116 user berechtigt in die dt-liste mit aufgenommen zu werden:

alte dt1-liste:

neue dt1-liste:

aus unserem deutschsprachigen bereich sind insgesamt 10 leute vertreten: Buchi-88, willi9974, o_solo_miner, Real-Duke, Lafu, mole0815, Lakai01, efialtis, bullrun2024bro und AHOYBRAUSE
hier ist nochmal der original beitrag von theymos: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg67198109#msg67198109

wer genau rausgeflogen ist und wer dafür neu aufgenommen wurde, dies könnt ihr aus dieser liste entnehmen - hier hat es leider qwk und d5000 getroffen:

I would take all claims by both exchanges and review sites (in this case, LandofCrypto) with a grain of salt. One example is the fees and costs, the advertised ones vs the effective fees observed by the reviewer. We know how volatile bitcoin and crypto is. BTC values can drop or rise within an hour rather quickly. It's difficult to calculate the exact amount you are supposed to receive with floating rates that change every 20-30 seconds for example. In some cases, LandofCrypto compared the costs with CoinGecko rates, so there are margin of errors there as well.

Pa iskreno, nisam ni vidio u njihovom threadu da najavljuju nekakvu super placu, jedino da se moze pregovarati. E sad, to sto su ljudi to mozda shvatili da mogu dobiti xyz iznos, to je nekakav drugi problem.
Vidim da je i jedan clan moje kampanje (koji je placen $100 tjedno) takodjer prihvacen u Antiswap tako da vjerojatno ne placaju lose. Doduse, postoje i nekakvi drugi razlozi zasto bi netko mogao prijeci kod njih, recimo to da se placa 6 mjeseci unaprijed pa bi to moglo biti primamljivo onome tko ocekuje da cijena bitcoina uskoro naraste, sto bi znacilo extra profit.


To svakako, i bilo bi glupo da imaju drukciji pristup.


Da, i mene je iznenadio izbor primljenih clanova, ali cini mi se da pokusavaju pokriti i lokalne boardove, pa od tuda i neka manje poznata imena.

Especially in situations where those review scores are influenced or paid for, third-party reviews are not always a good choice if you really want to get the best genuine reviews.

Exchanges have a lot of affiliate marketing the drive volumes of executed orders, but sometimes those orders don't represent actual realities as far as individual customer satisfaction is concerned.

Geah  this is basically free advertising most of the time, and when the user clicks and complete the order dex.fo will pay a fee.

Most of the time users bookmark the page and don't use the ref link anymore.

So this is a very interesting and effective promotion to be implemented by dex

Thanks, everyone — this is exactly the kind of input we were hoping for. We'll think over all of these suggestions: new coins, DAI/USDS, and cheaper networks for stablecoins. As before, no dates — first we finish the technical side of the service, then we expand coins and networks.

We use our own liquidity pools, so once the required confirmations are received, your coins are sent immediately. Unlike larger exchanges such as Swapuz and PegasusSwap, which rely on resold or third-party liquidity and may require users to wait 40 minutes or more for their coins, we are able to process swaps directly from our own pools.

You can also verify our liquidity on-chain by tracking our wallets and seeing the funds moving in and out. We do not enforce KYC or AML requirements, as clearly stated in our Terms of Service.

This is also why Monero can occasionally become unavailable or limited on our platform, while other services may advertise XMR as "unlimited." When you operate your own liquidity pools, the available balance is naturally subject to what is actually in those pools.

Additionally, every quote clearly shows the applicable limits, rate, and expected slippage. We believe in being transparent about the conditions of every swap rather than hiding these details from users.

Our transparency has also been recognized by OrangeFren, a trusted exchange aggregator, who described us as one of the most transparent exchanges.

X post from OrangeFren about us:
https://x.com/OrangeFren/status/2105251362930102697

I agree USDS is a very needed stable coin, most people don't know about it and have never used it. I used to trade it on centralized exchanges but only for sake of trading not for its actual usage.

Since USDT and USDC are widely acceptable that is why they are mostly used and preferred by the users. Although, they can get frozen for obvious reasons but still people use those stable coins because those are accepted everywhere.

I think for majority of users it will be more helpful to add support for different networks of the stable coins like USDT and USDC as they're the most preferred stable coins. Personally, I use USDC/USDT on Binance network and for me both of those work pretty well.

About the board to post your project. You are trying to tell the forum that you have a project at hand and it will be a service for people to use. Therefore it is a service or announcement thread therefore what examplens recommended for you is the best place to drop or create the announcement. You can now lock this thread and create your ANN thread over there.

But what I don't understand is the looking for a  partnership online. You don't have to. Are you telling us that all the 4 developers can't pull resources together to finish up the project? And once the project has been completed and the services are very much okay for people to use, you don't look for investors but they will definitely come. For now focus on developing a good project that people will like to use.

Thanks for pinning this down - that explains problem.

Tor Browser's Safest security level disables JavaScript on all sites (and Safer often does the same on onion, because the service is http://, not https://). AntiSwap currently expects JavaScript: the language switcher and the currency list on the left are rendered that way, so they will not work with JS turned off. That is expected at the moment, not a Tor outage.

A proper no-JS version is not planned as a current task, but we may add one later so Safest users can switch language and browse directions without scripts.

This is how important their reaction towards those accusations posted against them, since their response and also evidence will just show that they are the one in good side and this is also how they could protect their reputation.

If they are silent towards the accusation posted against them, this will spread fast because. their critics will just create new account to spread more fire.

Their possible quick response could possibly stop and discourage any further fake accusation against their platform.

Po meni je to bio social experiment da se vidi koliko nisko su spremni ići najbolji profili s isplatama. Nadam se da nas nisu unazadili previše sa danom statistikom. Ovo je bila perfektna prilika za "rising tides lifts all ships", da nitko od top profila nije ponudio ispod recimo 200$ bilo bi to neko novo vrijeme kampanja.

Ono šta ja očekujem da se dogodilo je da je par dobrih profila dalo relativno male zahtjeve i odmah dobilo mjesto. Totalno nagađanje s moje strane, nisam uopće gledao ko je primljen niti ako ima kakav tx id iz kojeg se vidi plaćanje. Tu sam ih svrstao od početka i kada su me kontaktirali na PM, napisao sam im da mi ne pada na pamet licitirati sa svojom cijenom niti korisiti nekakav neprovjerani bot za prijavu. Znaju di sam pa ako sam im stvarno interesantan nek se jave sa konkretnom ponudom.

Hvala na lijepim riječima.
Jesam prijavio sam se i osim onih $5 što su davali onima koji se prijave nisam dobio nikakav odgovor. Koliko vidim kampanja je još otvorena. Međutim, jedan korisnik koji je prihvaćen (FinneysTrueVision) je napisao da je kampanja već počela. Njemu su za dan javili da je prihvaćen. Kako oni kažu, već su neki učesnici odabrani ali nisu svi. Ta je informacija stara par dana, ne znam kako je sad.

U utorak bi trebala ponovo da se nastavi EarnBet kampanja pa opet nosim njihov potpis.

One sign that suggests that they could be using their own liquidity pools is the few top coins that are listed on their swap page and the lower maximum limits for swapping something that is so rare for services that use third party liquidity partners.

it would be awesome to add links to the listed partners part

The most obvious part is that they have not been using their own brain both before and after the incident!

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15148 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (18) 10544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2810 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3690 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7015 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +44 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2342 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +56 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2667 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 209 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 14034 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 7056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 10944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 787 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +42 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4531 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11571 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 12317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (60) 21792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3169 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +11 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 10651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1430 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 4123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +6 / =7 / -0) (DT1! (0) 841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1536 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4017 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3755 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2083 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4698 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (40) 13468 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2415 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 10225 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7777 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4349 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 21519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3256 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2621 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5868 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 5873 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +51 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (4) 3830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1753 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 8399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10341 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1659 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5396 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1305 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3663 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 3442536: AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2047 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 7322 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (8901 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

My question is how will this exchange monitoring sites know if the order ID is valid or not since some of the services are so much about privacy where a third party may not be able to see the details of the exchange?

And yes kycnot.me looks like a one more operation. The person behind the platform is a privacy advocate but as the platform grew in popularity, I think is he is overwhelmed by the work load which is why even listed exchanges take long to get approved.

I'm waiting for a refund; I think being removed from OF might affect this process. I'll also post about this on Reddit.
Thank you for your concern—you're really helping a lot.

Thanks! I did it! And I'm still waiting for orangeFren to take action. There's still Reddit, but I'll post there later

Slot #: 44
BTC Address: bc1qpzwvre2ynerqxc6nk6ur8zspvdx54qrzwyy7f7

---

latest scrapped participants data and available slots

USERNAME	SLOT	RANK	REG DATE	POST
......................................	......	....................	................................	.........
Porfirii	01	Legendary	April 27, 2017	check
tiCeR	02	Legendary	July 10, 2011	check
Kelward	03	Hero Member	April 22, 2023	check
internetional	04	Legendary	October 24, 2016	check
DabsPoorVersion	05	Sr. Member	April 01, 2017	check
xandry	06	Legendary	September 29, 2014	check
Harkorede	07	Copper Member	May 27, 2018	check
mv1986	08	Legendary	February 09, 2014	check
Real-Duke	09	Legendary	December 22, 2014	check
Smartprofit	10	Legendary	August 21, 2017	check
Peanutswar	11	Legendary	February 17, 2020	check
laijsica	12	Sr. Member	February 21, 2024	check
TheButterZone	13	Legendary	June 22, 2012	check
Pmalek	15	Legendary	May 05, 2013	check
notblox1	16	Legendary	April 08, 2018	check
klarki_mobile	17	Full Member	September 06, 2025	check
zasad@	18	Legendary	July 25, 2019	check
ASloveapg	19	Full Member	February 19, 2025	check
RGBTC	20	Legendary	November 30, 2017	check
UserU	21	Hero Member	December 17, 2017	check
famososMuertos	22	Legendary	January 05, 2018	check
GazetaBitcoin	23	Legendary	November 06, 2017	check
FinneysTrueVision	25	Legendary	October 13, 2018	check
Rikafip	26	Legendary	August 03, 2019	check
Soonandwaite	27	Legendary	January 16, 2019	check
angrybirdy	29	Sr. Member	November 29, 2016	check
Barcode_	30	Hero Member	February 21, 2016	check
Debbiecrypto	31	Member	February 06, 2024	check
Bigjoe33	32	Sr. Member	August 10, 2024	check
LogitechMouse	33	Legendary	September 07, 2017	check
examplens	34	Legendary	April 13, 2014	check
bitmover	35	Legendary	December 31, 2017	check
ovcijisir	37	Legendary	October 30, 2017	check
Etiquette.exe	38	Full Member	April 23, 2025	check
inspace	39	Legendary	November 19, 2018	check
cocadalcan	42	Full Member	February 19, 2024	check
Tmoonz	43	Hero Member	December 20, 2023	check
Hypnotizer	46	Sr. Member	September 01, 2025	check
Pandorak	48	Hero Member	January 24, 2023	check
jahead	49	Sr. Member	August 03, 2017	check
Alvin_talk	50	Full Member	August 09, 2025	check

Available Slots (9): 14, 24, 28, 36, 40, 41, 44, 45, 47

---

Just a reminder: this is just scraped data, not a final decision. The manager can still move or reassign the slots based on their rules. This is just for reference. Also, since it's an automated scrape, sometimes error or bug can happen, just double check it. scrapped using telegram bot: @btalkgamesbot

It looks like they also use different keyword when creating the account. For example, account LedgerRecovery created 4 spam reply, where one of them even claim almost certain chance to make recovery.

Maybe you could tell me which other reputable listings feature GS besides OF and Kycnot.me? They haven't actually responded to me yet; OF promised to remove them from its listing if they don't reply, and I'm still waiting for that to happen.

This already has been moved to the trashbin, very likely because it was reported as non-declared LLM vomit. There's not much wrong with AI enhanced or produced text, just declare it properly as such and don't pretend it came from a human. Repeating this too often may get your account banned.

Some here don't want to read or interact with AI pretending to be human or hiding the fact that no human wrote it. There's also a forum rule about AI usage. Make yourself familiar with Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ.

About further recommendations: probably buy a Copper membership so that you can immediately post visible image links. Otherwise you have to wait to become Jr. Member rank which isn't too hard, but requires getting a bit merit and some activity.

PS: It's fun making those comments where you don't have to write a single letter.

i think there is someone/group that has been doing this support scam for a long time here on the forum.

last year i had something similar happen to me after posting a topic on the technical board: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5535453.0
but from the PM, i see they have changed how they run it.

you should have played along to see what their next move would have been, and maybe trolled them a bit while you were at it. it's fun missing with them 

But in a business, the assessment is different. just like in the case you mentioned, people might create an account just to post a review or a thread accusing the company scammed users and never comeback. if it’s a fake review, the company clarification becomes important. the company can issue a clarification on the same day or in the next days stating that the allegation is under investigation. If the allegation is found as false/fake accusation, the company can issue a statement confirming that the user claims are untrue, backed by evidence from the company. In this way, fake reviews can be minimized as long as the company actively monitors allegations and responds as quickly as possible. because an action like this necessary to keep company reputations clean from any fake accusations.

Exactly examplens, and other platforms/directories should also be checked and they all have their own ways of managing such matters. That's why a new customer always reads reviews from multiple sources, not just one.

Can't agree more.

IDK maybe this is too much asking, anyway as I said IDK about their current way of communicating besides the fact that I know, this is too much expectation but I completely agree with this as if it can be implemented then it should be.