Last update: 2025-11-19_Wed_19.42h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66069269 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 19:40:01 CET 2025) in [Registration] Best Altcoins Portfolio 2025:

The finish line is approaching and weeks go by, but they are not all the same.
Some manage to stabilize their portfolios, while others dare to take my place on the podium Smiley.



   Pos      Users      18/11/2025   
   1      paid2      1 359,56   
   2      internetional      1 215,52   
   3      LoyceV      1 191,72   
   4      Halab      1 148,40   
   5      GazetaBitcoin      1 088,68   
   6      sompitonov      959,23   
         Bitcoin      927,78   
   7      ajiz138      859,01   
   8      memehunter      825,25   
   9      DireWolfM14      818,77   
   10      examplens      760,92   
   11      rat03gopoh      719,23   
   12      icopress      695,93   
   13      n0nce      635,00   
   14      GrosWesh      597,15   
         Average      546,28   
   15      shahzadafzal      536,90   
   16      FinneysTrueVision      535,39   
   17      B1g4udge      532,82   
   18      Smartprofit      526,24   
   19      DYING_S0UL      513,90   
   20      tokeweed      443,80   
   21      Woodie      430,39   
   22      Saint-loup      414,12   
   23      Rikafip      413,85   
   24      jokers10      407,78   
   25      Taskford      393,05   
   26      LogitechMouse      385,93   
   27      SamReomo      373,13   
   28      Despairo      372,40   
   29      xandry      357,62   
   30      cryptofrka      339,80   
         Random_but_balanced      322,82   
   31      klarki      252,61   
   32      bitmover      251,46   
   33      libert19      244,85   
   34      worldofcoins      228,32   
   35      famososMuertos      208,52   
   36      arallmuus      201,72   
   37      Buchi-88      200,81   
   38      Koal-84      175,97   
   39      xLays      133,82   
   40      slackovic      101,41   
                  


Line chart race : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/
LCR without Woodie  : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/24269401/



2. Post 66069109 (unedited backup) (by irfan_pak10) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 19:00:02 CET 2025) in [ANN] RedotPay: Spend Crypto Like Fiat – Virtual & Physical Cards Available!:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:39:56 AM
-snip-
As Rikafip mentioned above, Slovenia is one of the most crypto-friendly countries, not only in the EU. I don't know if you are a recognized partner with Redotpay, but maybe you could suggest to them reconsider this list and possibly update it.

Thanks for pointing this out. I’m already connected with the RedotPay team, so I’ll pass this specific detail to them for review and share their official response once I have it.




3. Post 66068542 (unedited backup) (by Zanab247) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 16:37:37 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: danadc on Today at 02:34:01 PM
Finally, there are users who have wagered several million on Betfury, but there are many reasons why they don't talk about it in public.

Wow, I'd love to reach that level. It's a huge skill Many people on the forum are like that; we don't know what they do in the games, how they play, or how much they bet. It's natural that they don't want to admit they make those kinds of bets. If I did, I'd also stay anonymous, and it's much better that way, Betfury attracts clients with a lot of potential.

Hahahaha, do you know how much they have lose before they win million from Betfury , just that people don't announcing their lost in public but some people like to spread their winning in public. I have not lose much in Betfury but there is a hope that my news will break out soon, because I believe in luck in any decision i am  taking in playing sport betting.

Not that they don't want to tell people about their winning that   made them a millionaire  from Betfury, but they are afraid of the public because they don't know who will be after their lifes or their personal details.



4. Post 66068295 (unedited backup) (by danadc) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 15:34:01 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: examplens on November 18, 2025, 08:49:56 PM
Finally, there are users who have wagered several million on Betfury, but there are many reasons why they don't talk about it in public.

Wow, I'd love to reach that level. It's a huge skill Many people on the forum are like that; we don't know what they do in the games, how they play, or how much they bet. It's natural that they don't want to admit they make those kinds of bets. If I did, I'd also stay anonymous, and it's much better that way, Betfury attracts clients with a lot of potential.



5. Post 66068037 (unedited backup) (by Synchronice) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 14:21:19 CET 2025) in 🔄 Changeum.io - Lightning-Fast Instant Crypto Exchange | No KYC:

Quote from: examplens on November 17, 2025, 12:52:18 PM
2) Regarding the KYC, there's no KYC on the website. We're not some kind of agency that verifies user data. However, the website does have an AML check to prevent money laundering. In that case, the user will simply be refunded without any deductions.
This requires a separate address for each transaction, without any relation to your wallet. Otherwise, your complete service will be marked as money laundering-friendly.
This is an interesting subject. Do they need separate address for each transactions or the money that they'll return should be the same UTXO that they received? I mean, if X wallet (that receives many transactions) received money from Y wallet, and X returns back the UTXO that it received from Y, is that still labeled as money laundering?

Quote from: examplens on November 17, 2025, 12:52:18 PM
Most often, however, KYC services, if they have a license, are from offshore zones, and it is difficult to determine the true ownership. Given the high likelihood of the regulator targeting such services, it seems like the only option.
If they have a license in offshores and regulators are targeting such services, then most likely they don't care whether they are licensed or have an offshore license, they'll take it as having no license, right? So, logically, it's not an option. eXch also had an offshore license but they got caught.



6. Post 66067963 (unedited backup) (by AHOYBRAUSE) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 14:02:20 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: examplens on November 18, 2025, 08:49:56 PM

Please show me 1 or even 2 people in this forum that are level 10 or higher. I am eager to see if there is someone crazy enough to wager 1 million (requirement for level 10 and "VIP" status) or more on this site.  Grin I was level 8 and regret every cent I wagered on betfury, and I have seen many shitty sites over the years. Funny they even dare to promote with posts like this in here, they really don't know their customer base.
As far as I know, Betfury has gone well beyond this forum. There are certainly Betfury users eligible for similar bonuses, and they don't necessarily have to be present on Bitcointalk.
Finally, there are users who have wagered several million on Betfury, but there are many reasons why they don't talk about it in public.

Hmm, your reply doesn't really make too much sense. Their post was made IN THIS FORUM, so it addresses FORUM MEMBERS, doesn't it? Why else post it here? Of course they have gone well beyond this forum, there is no question about that. Yet the promote something in their ANN that most likely not 1 or 2 people in here would or could take advantage of or part in, that's what I meant with my original post.



7. Post 66067253 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 10:22:14 CET 2025) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:

Its time for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, this time for October 2025. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet.



Post activity per local board during October 2025

During October, 14463 posts were written across local boards that are part of this overview, which is a solid increase compared to September's 12612 posts. All the most active boards had better numbers than in September, with Nigerian boatrd reaching yet another all time high number of posts.




Active members per local board during October 2025

During the last month, 1466 forum members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards, which is an increase compared to month before (1292). This is actually quite a big increase, because number of active members don't change much from month to month and its a good sign that members are reactivating now that summer is behind us.

Nigerian board just keeps increasing their lead on this chart, while Russian is far behind on the 2nd spot and will unlikely regain the top spot in the near future.



Local board members per amount of posts during October 2025

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during October, leader is Arabic board with 59% of such members, while at the same bracket Greek board had only 11% of members.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Romanian board with 67% of the members while Portuguese had the lowest percentage, only 21%.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Croatian board is the leader with 62% of the members, while at the bottom is Romanian board that didn't have any members who wrote 10+ posts.




Merit shared per local board during October 2025

During the above mentioned period, 8427 merit was shared across local boards, which is a drop compared to September's numbers (8922 merit).

While Nigerian board remained the most merited board, their number of shared merit went down significantly, and the same thing can be said about German board that went even more down percebtage wise. Overall drop would be even bigger if Russian board didn't have an increase compared to month before.



Merit/Post ratio per local board during October 2025

In October, average merit per post ratio across local boards was 0.58, which is an decrease compared to September's 0.7 merit per post. Once again Romanian board had the highest ratio, followed by Polish and Spanish locals, while Greek board remained the the one with the lowest merit per post ratio, wuite below their 12 month average.



Merit senders and receivers per local board during October 2025

In October, 654 members sent while 685 received merit in one of the local boards, which is an increase compared to September (582 senders and 656 receivers).

Nigerian board is naturally at the top, with the difference from the others  that hasn't been seen before when it comes to this chart.




Merit per transaction across local boards during October 2025

After some time Arabic local is at the top, while Polish is at the very high 2nd spot which is not surprise given their high merit per post ratio.




The most active members per local board during October 2025

And for the end of the overview, list of the most active local board members. joker_josue from Portuguese local board remained the most active one with 149 posts, while 2nd and 3rd spots are reserved for 2 members from Russian local board, Julien_Olynpic with 132  and klarki with 130 posts.

Russian |German |Turkish |Italian |Portuguese |Spanish |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. Julien_Olynpic [132] |1. MaxMueller [75] |1. execijutiere [98] |1. conilmionome [55] |1. joker_josue [149] |1. darxiaomi [51] |
2. klarki [130] |2. mole0815 [69] |2. mandown [98] |2. fillippone [45] |2. sabotag3x [69] |2. famososMuertos [37] |
3. zasad@ [98] |3. MinoRaiola [55] |3. ajanwalker [80] |3. Ale88 [42] |3. bitmover [61] |3. Porfirii [36] |
4. Numeral [93] |4. cygan [55] |4. yenerbatmaz [74] |4. babo [38] |4. TryNinja [59] |4. danadc [26] |
5. Alex077 [81] |5. Soonandwaite [51] |5. Mustang Shelby [61] |5. *Ace* [35] |5. alegotardo [58] |5. Hispo [23] |
6. safar1980 [45] |6. Real-Duke [47] |6. kriminall [60] |6. Plutosky [33] |6. Forsyth Jones [44] |6. Don Pedro Dinero [21] |
7. KTChampions [41] |7. Koal-84 [46] |7. xzone [57] |7. ubaldo81 [32] |7. Paredao [37] |7. Filicius [8] |
8. eisen33 [41] |8. Unknown01 [38] |8. blomen [56] |8. dollyamo [30] |8. mikel_012 [34] |8. d5000 [6] |
9. PerfectumR [37] |9. bct_ail [36] |9. Phoenix Anka [55] |9. Lillominato89 [29] |9. rdluffy [28] |9. darbitmobilerecovery [5] |
10. hedgeh0g [37] |10. Lakai01 [27] |10. Silence Scream [49] |10. gbianchi [28] |10. Pumared [26] |10. btc-marty [4] |

Indonesian |French |Pilipinas |Croatian |Nigerian |Arabic |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. traderethereum [33] |1. patrickus [18] |1. blockman [60] |1. slackovic [62] |1. Jubilee58 [80] |1. khaled0111 [30] |
2. Rashlyowl [25] |2. winspiral [14] |2. gunhell16 [53] |2. katanic97 [39] |2. Floxynice [69] |2. yhiaali3 [30] |
3. jcojci [25] |3. Danydee [13] |3. tech30338 [46] |3. Rikafip [33] |3. Charles-Tim [64] |3. Kavelj22 [27] |
4. joniboini [25] |4. G.Seed [4] |4. cryptoaddictchie [38] |4. paco92x [26] |4. Karl_3000 [56] |4. Ochan_yazo_tochant [13] |
5. @nn@_pen9 [24] |5. GrosWesh [4] |5. technicalguy83 [33] |5. cryptofrka [23] |5. TrialBitcoin [56] |5. GxSTxV [6] |
6. Nahl [24] |6. -Fana- [3] |6. GreatArkansas [29] |6. Pmalek [22] |6. Mr_Brilliant$ [49] |6. Sebastian Michaelis [6] |
7. Gaza13 [23] |7. Saint-loup [3] |7. arwin100 [29] |7. ovcijisir [22] |7. Donk1 [47] |7. Jaksonhard [3] |
8. maydna [23] |8. paid2 [3] |8. Peanutswar [24] |8. Trofo [21] |8. Sammye3 [46] |8. OmegaStarScream [3] |
9. woez [22] |9. Rocou [2] |9. rbynxx [23] |9. examplens [14] |9. PremiumcryptoHub [44] |9. arabspaceship123 [3] |
10. Juse14 [21] |10. TryNinja [2] |10. Fredomago [22] |10. dkbit98 [10] |10. Yablee0 [41] |10. hugeblack [3] |

Polish |Indian |Greek |Romanian |Pakistan* |Bengali* |
_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|_________________|
1. cygan [11] |1. Bitcoin Smith [35] |1. cryptosize [40] |1. GazetaBitcoin [8] |1. qurbanshah02 [76] |1. Bd officer [22] |
2. pawel7777 [3] |2. pawanjain [22] |2. BlackHatCoiner [23] |2. NeuroticFish [4] |2. JunaidAzizi [37] |2. Crypto Library [17] |
3. TryNinja [2] |3. TheUltraElite [12] |3. alani123 [14] |3. TryNinja [2] |3. AgriTrack [35] |3. Review Master [15] |
4. ertil [2] |4. JSRAW [10] |4. Ultegra134 [11] |4. othell_rogue [2] |4. Jaweria parveen [33] |4. DYING_S0UL [14] |
5. EXMON [1] |5. henmark [6] |5. Makis Kotzampasis [8] |5. jedaite [1] |5. Doll2233 [32] |5. God Of Thunder [10] |
6. Xal0lex [1] |6. LucyFurr [4] |6. apogio [5] |6. vul777 [1] |6. BTC FutureKing [31] |6. Hridyansh Labs [5] |
7. pbies [1] |7. M47AK16 [4] |7. Dimitris [3] | |7. ZAINmalik75 [29] |7. Mahiyammahi [5] |
8. szaksy [1] |8. TSen [4] |8. siderisng [2] | |8. MusaPk [26] |8. Z_MBFM [5] |
|9. mustapha67 [4] |9. smilodon [1] | |9. Cheema02 [24] |9. Ricardo11 [3] |
|10. IIrik11 [3] | | |10. Compromise me [22] |10. Royal Cap [3] |












8. Post 66067076 (unedited backup) (by iv4n) (scraped on Wed Nov 19 09:34:37 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: examplens on November 18, 2025, 08:49:56 PM

Please show me 1 or even 2 people in this forum that are level 10 or higher. I am eager to see if there is someone crazy enough to wager 1 million (requirement for level 10 and "VIP" status) or more on this site.  Grin I was level 8 and regret every cent I wagered on betfury, and I have seen many shitty sites over the years. Funny they even dare to promote with posts like this in here, they really don't know their customer base.
As far as I know, Betfury has gone well beyond this forum. There are certainly Betfury users eligible for similar bonuses, and they don't necessarily have to be present on Bitcointalk.
Finally, there are users who have wagered several million on Betfury, but there are many reasons why they don't talk about it in public.

Most of their promotions suck, and some of them have unfair rules, but I would definitely participate if Betfury & Royse do that 10-week challenge again... I'm not sure how likely it is to happen, but it was interesting & exciting while it lasted.

Well, until that happens, I will just keep passing on all the other offers...





9. Post 66065521 (unedited backup) (by gunhell16) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 21:42:08 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: serjent05 on November 17, 2025, 10:39:04 PM
60% APY is unrealistic in any industry, unless you are dealing with illegal business. I think every serious investor is aware of that.
I fully agree, even APY over 10% to 20% sounds unrealistic when it comes to full legality and investors who're huge investors would love to steal any safe deal if it offers them 10% APY. In most realistic cases 5% APY is normal and more than that sounds unrealistic. Most tokens won't perform that good and that's why even investing in them won't be as profitable.

10% -20% APY is easily achievable and can be given with ease by any financial institution, it is that most financial institution wanted to rake all the profit and give the investors the least amount possible.  You can see this by looking at how much financial institutions setting interest on their loan programs.  Their interest ranges from 6% to 15% monthly. 

So with a platform that holds the source of the token, they can easily give out even 100% APY annually.  But obviously, for the token economic reason, the platform acts reserve because they need to maintain the market supply in check.

So what it means is that if this is really how crypto casinos that have their own token operate, they really create these kinds of systems to maintain the liquidity they have?
That's why most crypto coins that have this kind of system offer something like this.

And of course, they also tell the coin holders that they still have benefits they can get from it, which I think there's nothing wrong with, especially if it's been existing
in this crypto space industry for several years already.



10. Post 66063344 (unedited backup) (by SmartGold01) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 09:19:55 CET 2025) in Trying to scam [rakebit]:

Quote from: examplens on November 17, 2025, 11:40:26 PM
Any projects that is managed by this way without them hiring a campaign manager is always tends to be redflag for me because I know that there are things involved which could either be bad acts, and wanting to scam people.
Hiring a manager or running a campaign independently is not necessarily a red signal. We've seen some very successful campaigns and services, where they ran the campaign by themselves, and we've also seen some campaigns that had managers and turned into shit.
That is very possible, but to where I am referring to is; if the campaign is being managed by any manager then he would make sure to secure the funds for the participants, or if he wasn't holding any fund he would make it clear to the applicants to know that he is not holding any fund and anyone who is join is on his own risk.. Something like this do exist, than the project running it independently without applicants knowing what is in their mind about their payments.



11. Post 66062325 (unedited backup) (by serjent05) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 23:39:07 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: SamReomo on Today at 06:17:22 AM
60% APY is unrealistic in any industry, unless you are dealing with illegal business. I think every serious investor is aware of that.
I fully agree, even APY over 10% to 20% sounds unrealistic when it comes to full legality and investors who're huge investors would love to steal any safe deal if it offers them 10% APY. In most realistic cases 5% APY is normal and more than that sounds unrealistic. Most tokens won't perform that good and that's why even investing in them won't be as profitable.

10% -20% APY is easily achievable and can be given with ease by any financial institution, it is that most financial institution wanted to rake all the profit and give the investors the least amount possible.  You can see this by looking at how much financial institutions setting interest on their loan programs.  Their interest ranges from 6% to 15% monthly. 

So with a platform that holds the source of the token, they can easily give out even 100% APY annually.  But obviously, for the token economic reason, the platform acts reserve because they need to maintain the market supply in check.



12. Post 66060777 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 17:20:44 CET 2025) in Jobs that pay with $btc:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:13:43 PM
That's in an ideal scenario.
Imagine, for example, a situation where someone has been saving his salary for the last 6 months, and in one period, Bitcoin reached its ATH. However, for specific reasons, today he wants to buy a house or a car, or even medical treatment with his bitcoin, and that's where we run into the reality of up to a 20% loss. Or, to put it more simply, he worked for free for one month because today he has so much less value than he earned under the contract.
Due to excessive volatility, Bitcoin is still not an ideal solution for basic needs such as salaries.
Bitcoin's volatility works in both ways. That's why it's not an advantage or disadvantage. It's a feature of the ecosystem. It's great when it works in your favor, but not so good when it doesn't. Relying exclusively on bitcoin and doing so all the time isn't smart. You gave one reason why. However, diversifying and taking a percentage of your salary in BTC is a good investment in the medium to long term. No one who held bitcoin for 3 years or longer has ever lost money. Their purchasing power improved drastically. At the same time, the purchasing power of their fiat fell.



13. Post 66060343 (unedited backup) (by Tręvoid) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 15:53:20 CET 2025) in █ Guaranteed No KYC / AML Checks █ Tręvoid's Swap Service █ CRYPTO ⇄ CRYPTO █:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:05:40 PM
@Tręvoid, based on the logs from earlier or at least the time of execution of transactions, can you make some kind of statistics and share them here?
For example, it might be interesting to know what is the average time of realisation of a swap on your service. Possibly how long everything took, from the first contact to the last transaction.
For using a p2p swap, response time is quite an important condition, and it could be useful for your potential users to know what to expect.

Hello examplens, and good day.

Thank you for reaching out and asking. For operational security reasons, we can’t share too many details about swaps, but we’re pleased to say that our service is running very smoothly. We have a strong and loyal client base, and many of them return regularly for swaps. So far, we haven’t encountered a single issue.

We currently operate two pools and deliver XMR according to client requests.

BTC > XMR
ETH > XMR
SOL > XMR
LTC(MWEB) > XMR

XMR > BTC
XMR > USDT
XMR > ETH

These pairs are the most chosen ones.

Each transaction is executed in under two minutes to five mins. Since we maintain our own reserves, there’s no waiting period or dependency on external funding. We are active on SimpleX for about 10 hours each day.

We also have a slogan that represents our mission well.

Quote
Simply you come, you swap and you leave.

Additionally, we’re proud to announce that we’ve been accepted and confirmed for listing on KNM.





14. Post 66060077 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 14:52:13 CET 2025) in EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED:

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 10:04:56 AM
I think in crypto things are just going way too far...
Exchanges fear regulators, not their users. So they stay on the safe side for their own interests.

Because regulations do not protect uses as they should. They worry just about AML, and dont care if innocent people lose their money in this war against money laundry...

This is a wrong approach.

Regulations should be protecting users as well. As examplens mentioned, period of times to release funds, what documents they can ask, etc..



15. Post 66059945 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 14:21:01 CET 2025) in EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:16:10 PM
If funds are already frozen, the regulator must prescribe the exact procedure for what happens with such coins.
That's where the shady part begins. Ironic, isn't it? I've seen many anonymous exchanges use regulations as an excuse to freeze funds, without even specififying which regulator of which country that would be.



16. Post 66059048 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 09:39:07 CET 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:

Quote from: examplens on November 16, 2025, 10:20:47 PM
Po sigurnosti smo mislim drugi, prvi je Island, snip
Pa normalno da je Island prvi kad je tamo -40 po noći, ne da se ni kriminalcima smrzavat a kamoli da se ljudi još šetaju  Grin

To ne računam, vrijede samo zemlje di se ljudi stvarno druže po vani i okupljaju u noćnim satima.
Ne treba sve posmatrati po sebi ili nekom svom slicnom okruzenju, jer tek kad malo zaceprkas saznas da ima dosta onih koji tesko zive i nose ozbiljne probleme svakodnevno. Ostao sam prilicno zatecen kada sam saznao da neke osobe iz mog okruzenja tesko sastavljaju kraj s krajem, mada su uvek dobro raspolozeni kada kontaktiramo.
Osim plata i kriminala, ima tu jos raznih faktora koji uticu na kvalitet zivota, zdravstvena zastita, kvalitet svih servisa koje drzava pruza, nepotizam, korupcija (bas aktuelno kod nas) i takve stvari saznas tek kad ih dozivis.

Ne tvrdim da je kod vas ovako ili onako, vi svi odavde ste predstavili jednu prilicno pozitivnu sliku, ali sam isto tako video nekoliko diskusija na Redditu gde sam prepoznao odredjene simptome i ljude koji zele pobeci od toga.

Dosta ljudi danas zivi tesko i jedva se sklapa kraj sa krajem,a na ulicama se voze automobili od prosecne cene jednog stana. Zdravstvo je dosta kod nas dostupno ali nije besplatno,i ako ne zelis da cekas uvek imas drugo resenje da odes privatno da se lecis,ali 80% ljudi ne moze to da priusti. Korupcija je glavni problem i to ce se jako tesko iskoreniti pogotovo na ovim prostorima. Uglavnom od drzava bivse SFRJ Hrvatska i Slovenija se isticu po platama , turizmu i generalno zivotu.



17. Post 66058977 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 09:13:49 CET 2025) in EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED:

Quote from: examplens on November 16, 2025, 09:18:59 PM
And that can be interpreted in different ways. For example, a friend of mine bought a mobile phone, which was later found to be stolen. The epilogue is that he returned the phone when the investigation came to that, but he did not get his money back. Yes, when he bought the device, he didn't know it was stolen.
Phones aren't fungible, that's the difference. If I borrow your phone, you'd want your own phone back, not another phone. If I borrow dollars (or Bitcoin), you don't expect the same coins back.

Quote
I believe that crypto regulators also adhere to this model.
It appears so.

Quote from: bitmover on November 16, 2025, 09:44:09 PM
But if a terrorist makes a SWIFT deposit to your account, you will face problems and your fiat money will be frozen.
Let's say you're a restaurant owner, and a terrorist had a meal. He pays with his debit card, and you receive his money. I don't think your account will be frozen for that. If it's a bigger amount, say for buying a car, it's still totally fine as long as it goes through the banking system. If they want to freeze it, they should freeze it at an earlier stage, not when it reaches your account. And that's part of the problem with crypto: some services freeze funds, others do not.

Quote
I believe the authorities acted too late in this situation, and if the OP can prove all those events since Exolix deposit, he should be fine. The problem is that some crypto exchanges are shady...
The next problem is the definition of the word "shady", this will vary from person to person, and from government to government. One activist's freedom fight can be some government worker's terrorism.



18. Post 66058901 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 08:48:14 CET 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:

Quote from: examplens on November 16, 2025, 10:20:47 PM
Ne treba sve posmatrati po sebi ili nekom svom slicnom okruzenju, jer tek kad malo zaceprkas saznas da ima dosta onih koji tesko zive i nose ozbiljne probleme svakodnevno. Ostao sam prilicno zatecen kada sam saznao da neke osobe iz mog okruzenja tesko sastavljaju kraj s krajem, mada su uvek dobro raspolozeni kada kontaktiramo.
Osim plata i kriminala, ima tu jos raznih faktora koji uticu na kvalitet zivota, zdravstvena zastita, kvalitet svih servisa koje drzava pruza, nepotizam, korupcija (bas aktuelno kod nas) i takve stvari saznas tek kad ih dozivis.

Ne tvrdim da je kod vas ovako ili onako, vi svi odavde ste predstavili jednu prilicno pozitivnu sliku, ali sam isto tako video nekoliko diskusija na Redditu gde sam prepoznao odredjene simptome i ljude koji zele pobeci od toga.

Nekako imam osjećaj da valjda 90% ljudi u Hrvatskoj u drugim državama vide samo med i mlijeko, a zapravo ne vide kako je kod nas dobro. Nikad neću zaboraviti kad prije 30 godina mamin bratić iz Berlina svoju kćer (koja je tad imala 13-14 godina) nije htio pustiti dalje od kuće u kojoj su boravili kod u Hrvatskoj. Nama svima je to bilo baš jako čudno ali ako je tada takva situacija bila u Berlinu, mogu si samo zamisliti kako je sad. Znam nekoliko ljudi koji su otišli raditi u Njemačku nakon što smo ušli u EU i na kraju su se vratili jer su shvatili da je kod nas ipak bolje.



19. Post 66058702 (unedited backup) (by SamReomo) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 07:17:25 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: examplens on November 16, 2025, 09:33:55 PM
60% APY is unrealistic in any industry, unless you are dealing with illegal business. I think every serious investor is aware of that.
I fully agree, even APY over 10% to 20% sounds unrealistic when it comes to full legality and investors who're huge investors would love to steal any safe deal if it offers them 10% APY. In most realistic cases 5% APY is normal and more than that sounds unrealistic. Most tokens won't perform that good and that's why even investing in them won't be as profitable.



20. Post 66057706 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 22:56:02 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on Today at 06:57:03 AM
...
Finally someone that sees this for what it is, a sketchy deal. They advertise those 60% like it's so easy to get but reading through the actual rules tells a different story. Also, I would never stake coins on a site like betfury. I rather take much less % but at least have it safe so to speak. Casinos can always restrict your account for whatever reason, even if they have to make up some just not to pay. Places like this are not for investments, they are just for entertainment.
honestly, i would not stake my coins on any site. remeber how things ended with luna UST and celsius? it's just too risky. and most "legit" places today will have your coins locked for a set amount of time, and if you ever need the coins for an emergency or something, good luck getting your money before the term ends.
if you are lucky, you will only have to forfeit your profit and pay a small penalty %, otherwise, you are out of luck.

but to be kinda fair to betfury, they did have a good staking plan at 27% APY with no sketchy terms other than locking your coins for 1 year, but they removed it a few months ago probably because it was bleeding them money (and we are talking about a casino here, they make a shit amount of money and still could not afford it).

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:33:55 PM
60% APY is technically good in the ear but the terms that comes along with it will be the major set back for investors who want to take the bankroll investment seriously,
60% APY is unrealistic in any industry, unless you are dealing with illegal business. I think every serious investor is aware of that.
60% APY are rookie numbers if we are talking about doing something illegal.



21. Post 66057649 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 22:44:13 CET 2025) in EXOLIX SENT ME STOLEN COINS, AND MY FUNDS ARE BLOCKED:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:18:59 PM
It’s 100% stolen coins from a phishing attack. Do you think any exchange would accept that?
That's where fungibility comes in play: I bet I have euro bills in my wallet that have been used by criminals at some point in the past. But none of that is my problem, as long as I'm not involved in the crimes, and nobody would blame me for having received those bills.
And that can be interpreted in different ways. For example, a friend of mine bought a mobile phone, which was later found to be stolen. The epilogue is that he returned the phone when the investigation came to that, but he did not get his money back. Yes, when he bought the device, he didn't know it was stolen.
I believe that crypto regulators also adhere to this model.

I agree with examplens, things are not that simple.

I think those concepts of "tainted coins" are going to  evolve.

Certainly a dollar bill isn't a problem, as LoyceV pointed out.
But if a terrorist makes a SWIFT deposit to your account, you will face problems and your fiat money will be frozen. I think this is a similar situation... The point is that the thief made already many transactions (to Exolix, from Exolix to OP, and from OP to the CEX), and the authorities just got the last one.



22. Post 66057527 (unedited backup) (by Ojima-ojo) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 22:17:43 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:11:43 PM
nope, i would say less than 1% of people staking any crypto on betfury are going with the 60% APY plan.
go check the terms and what you have to do to get that 60% APY and come back to tell me if you still think it's good... spoiler alert, it's shit.
I think it's like that with any staking. I followed it for a while, and even invested in similar options, but in the end I very rarely remained even positive. Inflation was always higher than real profit.
Yes, you get an increased amount in the token, but also its value has dropped by the same amount or more. Staking and locking coins for a long period is a benefit only for the owner and reduces the risk of dumping.
60% APY is technically good in the ear but the terms that comes along with it will be the major set back for investors who want to take the bankroll investment seriously, and couple with the low value of those staked coins, example like those staking and getting rewarded with betfury tokens have the challenges of the low value of the token and how it have become almost impossible for the price to recover for whatever reason.

Most casinos tokens are like that, and this frustrates investors who get rewarded with those worthless tokens that are casino native tokens.



23. Post 66051368 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 12:52:38 CET 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (55) 13711 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9051 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2349 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4251 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2666 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 9764 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3201 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (1) 8751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 5866 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 112493: Pmalek (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 8224 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1608 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1612 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 5983 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6316 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (36) 1836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2142 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2585 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 12324 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5930 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6510 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +31 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3133 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 9188 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 672 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4026 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3454 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11027 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2291 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 19311 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 8463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2038 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3776 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 958 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 441 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1458 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3542 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1089 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 986781: imhoneer (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 1350 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +93 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4010 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1782 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2117 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5116 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4231 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14811 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2110 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3065 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 11015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1290 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2145 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 8943 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2387 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3060 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 7034 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3144 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2241 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 5134 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1473 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +39 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1834 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1102 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5272 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 7390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1707 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9080 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1514 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 8888 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1132 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2869 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6611 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1344 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8033 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)



24. Post 66051175 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 11:40:55 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:

Quote from: Bridgoro on November 12, 2025, 11:50:13 AM
We would especially like to thank one of our community members [ examplens ] for his exceptional help. While we faced multiple bans trying to access Reddit, he managed to post and maintain our Bridgoro subreddit there, as well as on Altcoinstalks, which has been a huge help for our visibility.

I am happy to see examplens managed to maintain your bridgoro subreddit. I believe this is the best way to go on Reddit. Just maintain your own subreddit, and try to make incentives for people to post there!

I already joined the community, upvoted a few posts and made a question here about how to get testnet tokens to make a few tests.

Does any of you have some bitcoin testnet coins? Or ethereum.
Thanks  Smiley



25. Post 66047432 (unedited backup) (by Darkex.com) (scraped on Fri Nov 14 14:14:07 CET 2025) in [ANN] Darkex Exchange | Global Trading Platform | Earn 5% Withdrawable Bonus:

Quote from: examplens on November 13, 2025, 09:46:20 AM
@Darkex.com, is there an official Darkex team member behind this account?
I find it strange that officials leave a referral link in ANN

If you already oblige your users to pass KYC, then you too would have to publicly publish information about who is behind the project, the license under which you are registered, and under which jurisdiction you are registered. I didn't find anything about it on the website.

You refer to the regulations, probably based on that you would lock users' accounts and coins, and at the same time you yourself are illegal

Many members of Bitcointalk are reluctant to perform KYC verification even on the most popular centralized exchanges out there. Why? Because ultimately that data gets abused, hacked, leaked, and sold online. It comes back to bite you in the ass. I doubt you will find many people interested in undergoing KYC at your exchange just to receive a small percentage of profit as a cashback bonus or whatever you want to call it.
The only good thing is that they at least emphasized right away that KYC is mandatory.




Hello,

Thank you for your feedback and for raising these points.

The referral link in the ANN is used purely for tracking community engagement and measuring the effectiveness of our campaigns. It does not affect users’ funds or access in any way and is not intended for personal gain by team members.

Regarding transparency, we fully understand the importance of disclosing information about the team, registration, and licensing. Our company is officially registered in Dubai, and we are preparing verified corporate documents to provide the community with clear and reliable information. All operations are fully compliant with applicable regulations.

We value the community’s attention to security and compliance and remain committed to building trust through transparency and professional conduct.



26. Post 66045848 (unedited backup) (by GeerieErik) (scraped on Fri Nov 14 02:22:01 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:

Quote from: @Whale on November 06, 2025, 02:27:29 PM
I agree with what Lakai01 says. You abruptly stopped all activities here. I understand that it is necessary to do an evaluation and look at the effects of the promotion here on the forum, but if you plan a long-term presence in crypto gambling, at least the basic activity is desirable.
We're still here!

Yes, we stopped the campaign and several other things at the same time and for the same reason as some of the most famous casinos here.

But we're still here, and we'll even be adding some raffles soon.

A few moments ago i was having some problems reaching the site, some 500 internal error was displayed, i was the only one having the issue? Now seems like its working again.
If the problem persists, please note that the navigation bar in this thread (post 1) contains links to official mirrors!  Kiss

Hi Whale!

Are you a VPN-friendly casino if I may ask? There is some confusion here because nothing against VPN is listed in your terms, apart from one more general line which says "24.12.3.2 Any attempt to bypass these restrictions (e.g. multiple accounts, VPNs, temporary emails) may result in disqualification or account suspension"

Does this mean the use of VPN is absolutely forbidden, or does it just mean that only if VPN is used to bypass country restrictions it is forbidden?
My country is not on the forbidden countries list but I often have a VPN turned on (for a multitude of reasons, such as downloading movies and using VPN on other casinos at the same time) and I don't want any future problems. So please let me know Smiley



27. Post 66044148 (unedited backup) (by MotoLM) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 18:09:56 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:47:15 AM
When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.
It's me, losing 13 bets at a row. If I can remember I didn't place anymore bets for a while back then lol.



28. Post 66044127 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 18:04:55 CET 2025) in Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts. :

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:35:09 AM
As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before.
I sure hope that he looks and something more other than IP address, as babo pointed out there are many reason why you could share IP address with someone. For example, I am always using VPN when logging on altcointalk, and I am sure many more are doing the same.



29. Post 66043759 (unedited backup) (by Sir_Garry55) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 16:37:31 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: Emikoyumi on Today at 11:59:41 AM
Very different from each individual, I will admit that I do play and bet more when I'm stress out from jobs and other facets of life. But I'm not that addicted, I have self control and regardless of the outcome, at the end of the day, it's me whose going to face it again tomorrow.
This is actually the difference between a gambling addiction and a professional gambler. 'Professional' doesn't mean this is your profession, but the strategy and everything related to gambling should move professionally. Probably gambling addicts don't care whether they are in stress or in relax mode. They will gamble without strategy and without any proper plans; they really don't have self-control, or they don't control themselves.
When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.
Althought, gambling is associated with uncertainty because it's a game of win or loose and as such I don't tink if there is fixed percentage of wine rate but the percentage of win rate may likely depend on the smartness of the person and the ability to make a good forecast using the present performance and strength of the club. However, for one to be consider a professional gambler the percentage of winning should be at least between 45% to 70%.
Just having intelligence is not enough. If it is not in your luck you won’t win even if you play well. This has happened to me many times. I have played on Betpanda.io several times and made a good amount of profit from there as well. Gambling is very uncertain. If you don’t get good cards in hand, no matter how well you try to play  you would not be able to win. And on betting sites choosing strong teams often increases your chances of winning. You can play these on Betpanda.io too.
In many other betting sites, is still same, or almost same as no difference is still known. The game of gambling is fix in that way and knowledge can not almost comprehend it, as it is see as something that can come and can not, if it is for it will be, so better still, the game is typically a lucky one and this is something we need to understand, whether on Betpanda.io too, so it is up to you to understand and not to over expect too much.



30. Post 66043396 (unedited backup) (by s1lverbox) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 15:10:19 CET 2025) in [ANN] Reclaimr.info - Scam databse, claim/frzoen funds tracker and knowledgebase:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:55:55 AM
As of now its slow and site is up for 2 weeks.
I welcome the idea, any action against scams is a good thing.
However, I have to ask. Considering the site is only two weeks old, how did it make a result so quickly and report $3,855,000 Total Amount Recovered? Where can we see cases in which some amount was recovered?


You have a typo in the subject, frozen, not frzoen

Each claim was added manually based on report from X for example. If you open reclaimr.info and move to claim tracker you will be presented with already added claims. Some can have just x.com post as source , some will have tx id as source. End game is to add and update when there is something to update.


With frozen funds there is option of recovery while with rug and scams funds are marked as LOST.
Why there is over 122m already reported? This report : https://reclaimr.info/claim-tracker#claim=-Od8jxT0VCs85i_K7qIo is done for latest balancer 100m loss due to hacking. Most important is that all reported funds are stay as REPORTED regardless if recovered or not. RECOVERED shows only when this happens and post is updated with this info. 

If you go to claim tracker website you can see for example ThEWhiteWhale case where he got his money back and openly updated the case. That way 3m was recovered and marked. If you follow update link or share button you can see post where OP saying he got his money back.

Please do not consider this site as some kind tracker which helps recovering funds in any way. Its purely directory like website where even small lost funds can be seen by community.

Title has been fixed. Thanks for the heads up.




31. Post 66043038 (unedited backup) (by babo) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 13:24:56 CET 2025) in Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts. :

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 12:14:50 PM
It is up to you to say whatever you want. As DS quoted some posts and pointed out, they do not add a tag only for simple rule violations. They are not required to declare their alternative accounts if it is not participate in signature campaigns or do not violate the major rules. Additionally, the admin does not apply the red dot solely based on a single IP connection. Each time you post on the forum, the post includes your IP address, and you can see that under your post in the bottom right corner.

If you use Tor or a VPN, your IP address would be different each session (At least each day). However, when your IP address matches every day you post, it is clear that you are using alternative accounts. I am making this assumption based on my understanding. examplens is Senator there while I am just a Junior Mod, and he knows more information.


ah if it is considered on a daily basis then it is not a problem
I thought it was used on a long-term basis, in this case it is appropriate

if user x matches ip address with user y TODAY then it makes sense
if it is considered for a long time then no, since the IPs of the exit nodes are always the same


in any case you have to stay calm, I didn't say something banal or here we use same approach.. but we dont use because many use TOR



32. Post 66043007 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 13:14:55 CET 2025) in Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts. :

Quote from: babo on Today at 08:57:10 AM
As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before. It is not allowed to have more than one independent account on this forum. You can have more than one, but they must be clearly linked, and only one has the right to participate in campaigns, awards, contests, etc.
The search function there is quite unusable, so it is a bit complicated to find a direct quote for these claims by the admin.

It's a pretty stupid decision for many reasons.
many connect from tor, and from tor you often have the same exit nodes, so it makes no sense to rely on the ip
same, they could use the VPN, so same story

as a basis for associating accounts it is a very stupid system
how stupid it is that he decided to put cloud flare in front, boasting about a ddos ​​that doesn't exist

It is up to you to say whatever you want. As DS quoted some posts and pointed out, they do not add a tag only for simple rule violations. They are not required to declare their alternative accounts if it is not participate in signature campaigns or do not violate the major rules. Additionally, the admin does not apply the red dot solely based on a single IP connection. Each time you post on the forum, the post includes your IP address, and you can see that under your post in the bottom right corner.

If you use Tor or a VPN, your IP address would be different each session (At least each day). However, when your IP address matches every day you post, it is clear that you are using alternative accounts. I am making this assumption based on my understanding. examplens is Senator there while I am just a Junior Mod, and he knows more information.



33. Post 66042998 (unedited backup) (by Faazs) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 13:13:01 CET 2025) in A worries of sport fans who don't gamble :

Quote from: examplens on October 29, 2025, 02:44:50 PM
Don't look at this only and exclusively from the gambler's point of view. There is a large number of sports fans who are not at all interested in betting in any sense, but follow sports only for enjoyment.

I know a lot of people who are regulars at the stadiums, follow every game of their favorite club, without ever opening a single bet. I also know those who don't even know all the rules of football, but are regulars in betting

If sports betting were to be abolished, gamblers would find their new place, and not much would change.
So, there is nothing to worry about.
Yeah I have alot of friends too who are not into gambling and don't find it interesting too, I feel their are always going to be people that gamble and those that don't,, these relationship is always balanced out, i don't feel their is going to be any major changes in the nearest future, though the number of new people gambling has been on a steady increase on a daily basis, we have to also note that others are also quitting gambling, so their is al kinetic relationship between them and going to continue for a very long time.



34. Post 66042951 (unedited backup) (by Emikoyumi) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 12:59:43 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: bestcandy on Today at 09:27:30 AM
Very different from each individual, I will admit that I do play and bet more when I'm stress out from jobs and other facets of life. But I'm not that addicted, I have self control and regardless of the outcome, at the end of the day, it's me whose going to face it again tomorrow.
This is actually the difference between a gambling addiction and a professional gambler. 'Professional' doesn't mean this is your profession, but the strategy and everything related to gambling should move professionally. Probably gambling addicts don't care whether they are in stress or in relax mode. They will gamble without strategy and without any proper plans; they really don't have self-control, or they don't control themselves.
When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.
Althought, gambling is associated with uncertainty because it's a game of win or loose and as such I don't tink if there is fixed percentage of wine rate but the percentage of win rate may likely depend on the smartness of the person and the ability to make a good forecast using the present performance and strength of the club. However, for one to be consider a professional gambler the percentage of winning should be at least between 45% to 70%.
Just having intelligence is not enough. If it is not in your luck you won’t win even if you play well. This has happened to me many times. I have played on Betpanda.io several times and made a good amount of profit from there as well. Gambling is very uncertain. If you don’t get good cards in hand, no matter how well you try to play  you would not be able to win. And on betting sites choosing strong teams often increases your chances of winning. You can play these on Betpanda.io too.



35. Post 66042798 (unedited backup) (by romero121) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 12:07:31 CET 2025) in Removal of trust feedback - Request (The Pharmacist & Darkstar_):

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:27:34 AM
There are two more as far as I can see: ranochigo and NeuroticFish. Darkstar_ won't remove the tag because he's been AWOL for long, and ranochigo hasn't been very active lately. If you want the tags of people who remain active to change, I don't know why you keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result.
Nothing will happen here, he just risks getting more 'spammer' tags. I don't know what kind of change he's talking about or if he's corrected his posts here, but the last few pages of his post history are mostly useless spam in the gambling discussions section.

Given that romero121 is making a request in this thread to remove tags while suggesting a review of his posts, it seems that he doesn't even understand what spam is.
Maybe in most of the users view, I may be a spammer. My personal view, forum is for discussion and knowledge sharing. I have put forward my views and maybe that can be wrong in someone's view. So, it's upto them and even in our forum everything is taking place with group formation. Even merits are shared within them and person who try their best too doesn't get rewarded for what they deserve. I made a thread and seeked users to participate in the conversation. Maybe the thread and contents were spam, JollyGood is one among to receive the DM. He should've responded or he should have notified me, this isn't the way to make users get into discussion. What he does, he keeps finding connected accounts to receive merits. What better he had done to the forum. So, everyone are for some purpose.



36. Post 66042632 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 11:18:56 CET 2025) in Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:54:56 AM
A sto da ne, rekao bih solidna odluka? Za relativno mali novac, mozes dobiti prilicnu dominaciju na forumu. Gledam mega threade u gambling discussion, cisto sumnjam da to bilo ko cita i da nekog interesuje, mozda zadnjih par postova se koristi, tek toliko da se ima na osnovu cega pisati reply + quote jos bolje. Kad vec malo ko cita, a opet su poseceni threads, makar slika Betpanda signature da dominira.
Neki mladji Member rank clanovi ce se mozda truditi da upadnu u oko menadzeru, pa jednog dana mogu imati vise sansi u boljoj kampanji sa boljom isplatom, opet plus.
Na kraju, signature je jednako vidljiv, bez obzira dolazi li od member rank ili legendary.

Ja bi ipak rekao da je potpis vidljiviji ako ga nosi korisnik koji piše u "normalnim" threadovima gdje netko stvarno i čita to što piše. Ako korisnik samo štanca postove u spam threadovima, onda nema baš neke svrhe. Ali opet, s druge strane je super što se daje prilika nižim rangovima da sudjeluju u kampanji i zarade nešto BTC-a. Samo pitanje je koliko trenutno ima stvarnih Member korisnika, a koliko su samo alt računi postojećih korisnika.



37. Post 66042591 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 11:07:20 CET 2025) in Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts. :

Quote from: babo on Today at 08:57:10 AM
As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before. It is not allowed to have more than one independent account on this forum. You can have more than one, but they must be clearly linked, and only one has the right to participate in campaigns, awards, contests, etc.
The search function there is quite unusable, so it is a bit complicated to find a direct quote for these claims by the admin.

It's a pretty stupid decision for many reasons.
many connect from tor, and from tor you often have the same exit nodes, so it makes no sense to rely on the ip
same, they could use the VPN, so same story

as a basis for associating accounts it is a very stupid system
how stupid it is that he decided to put cloud flare in front, boasting about a ddos ​​that doesn't exist

FYI:

here are some the direct quotes, one from admin, one from Freemind.

Quote from: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=321705.msg1925445#msg1925445
Any user who does not comply with the rules (at least the strictest ones, such as not cheating in signature campaigns) will be flagged and added to the zoom group without exception.

Quote from: Freemind link=https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=329747.msg1764898#msg1764898
Users are not required to declare multiple accounts, but if they are found to be violating forum rules by using multiple accounts or participating in signature campaigns, for example, they will receive a red dot for the reasons mentioned above. You might be wondering, if they're not required to declare their accounts, why do they receive a red dot? It's simply to ensure that all users have the same opportunities.



38. Post 66042469 (unedited backup) (by bestcandy) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 10:27:32 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:47:15 AM
Very different from each individual, I will admit that I do play and bet more when I'm stress out from jobs and other facets of life. But I'm not that addicted, I have self control and regardless of the outcome, at the end of the day, it's me whose going to face it again tomorrow.
This is actually the difference between a gambling addiction and a professional gambler. 'Professional' doesn't mean this is your profession, but the strategy and everything related to gambling should move professionally. Probably gambling addicts don't care whether they are in stress or in relax mode. They will gamble without strategy and without any proper plans; they really don't have self-control, or they don't control themselves.
When we talk about a professional gambler, what percentage of win rate is considered normal for such players? Are there any usual frameworks in which this moves? 5%, 10% or more?
I'm primarily thinking about sports betting.
Althought, gambling is associated with uncertainty because it's a game of win or loose and as such I don't tink if there is fixed percentage of wine rate but the percentage of win rate may likely depend on the smartness of the person and the ability to make a good forecast using the present performance and strength of the club. However, for one to be consider a professional gambler the percentage of winning should be at least between 45% to 70%.



39. Post 66042455 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 10:22:44 CET 2025) in eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:13:15 AM
The final conclusion is that it is impossible to blame anyone in this case, and the end user bears the greatest damage.
This is what happens when some services treat fungible coins as non-fungible. Governments wouldn't allow this to happen to their fiat money, as it destroys trust in the currency. Which is exactly the reason they apply it to crypto.



40. Post 66042373 (unedited backup) (by babo) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 09:57:13 CET 2025) in Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts. :

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:35:09 AM
As I understand it, on the AltcoinsTalks forum, the admin decides to flag alternate accounts based on direct access to users' IP address logs, as has been the case in similar situations before. It is not allowed to have more than one independent account on this forum. You can have more than one, but they must be clearly linked, and only one has the right to participate in campaigns, awards, contests, etc.
The search function there is quite unusable, so it is a bit complicated to find a direct quote for these claims by the admin.

It's a pretty stupid decision for many reasons.
many connect from tor, and from tor you often have the same exit nodes, so it makes no sense to rely on the ip
same, they could use the VPN, so same story

as a basis for associating accounts it is a very stupid system
how stupid it is that he decided to put cloud flare in front, boasting about a ddos ​​that doesn't exist



41. Post 66039212 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 15:24:31 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:08:26 PM
From what I see now on the Bridgoro platform, 1 BRGX = 1 USD. Is that the correct rate?
Also, if the BRGX token is only and exclusively for internal use, I assume that this means that its rate will not change, because it will not be exposed to external influence and pump/dump risk?
Correct.



Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:08:26 PM
btw. What exactly is the reason for this update, and setting the minimum exchange amount to $60
Quote
Exchange Features 
Minimum exchange amount: ~$60 (USD equivalent)[UPDATED]
The reason is related to the Dead Wallet Amount. If the price of crypto assets drops significantly, as it did on October 10, funds may get stuck because the remaining balance might be lower than the required network fee. During such price fluctuations, network fees can rise sharply, making small amounts effectively unspendable.



42. Post 66039046 (unedited backup) (by MotoLM) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 14:39:20 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:16:54 AM
Is there anybody else experiencing a painfully slow loading time when trying to access the sportsbook section?
My internet is pretty good right now, and I have tried through different browsers, but the part where the games and the odds are supposed to be displaced is just blank.
I just checked it now to see. Loading the main page and logging in is fast. So is navigating the home page. When I click on the sports section, it does slow down a bit. For a few seconds I only see the blue background before the page loads and displays content. It's not painfully slow on my end but it could be faster. It's not the first sportsbook that I have seen that is a bit slower, though, considering the amount of events and how much information is available on-page.
I just wanted to confirm the same thing based on my experience with Betpanda yesterday. I just checked, and it seems to be working within normal limits for the site's loading speed (sportsbet section). Maybe they improved something in the meantime.  Smiley Of course, it would be desirable if the site would speed up a bit, but it seems to me that it is currently common what we see on all similar platforms. Some are even significantly slower to load.
betpandacasino.io is their official mirror. You can try out the site when the main has issues.