Last update: 2025-12-13_Sat_12.00h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

examplens receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. examplens
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none

Username "examplens" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66166976 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Dec 13 11:57:25 CET 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:
DT 1
     1. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2360 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1724 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2666 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9956 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 3232 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 8920 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8322 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1662 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6086 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1879 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1838 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 12549 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5960 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 6533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 3207 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 9240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +138 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 699 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3490 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11067 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11230 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 525 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4497 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2366 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 4170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (57) 19559 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2895 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1324 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 987 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 442 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3569 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1239 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6468 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1805 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2131 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4273 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14921 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2138 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3091 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +77 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 11054 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1302 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2180 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1981 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9020 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3131 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (7) 1354 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3677 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3150 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19478 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2257 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2404 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 5215 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5156 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1485 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +43 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 3225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1872 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3785 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 803 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1544 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1103 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5327 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1750 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9125 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1524 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5056 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9031 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6095 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2947 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6633 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1360 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (13754 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 203: HostFat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


2. Post 66166408 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Sat Dec 13 07:45:02 CET 2025) in Novosti:
Quote from: ovcijisir on December 12, 2025, 01:12:32 PM
Sto je taj zakon vec uveden? Mislio sam da ce to vrijediti tek od nove godine ... Ja imam sredstva na MEXC-u koji trazi KYCsamo ako se napravi povlacenje sredstava vece od 1000 USD unutar 24h, tako da sam vecinom prilikom trgovanja povlacio kripto u vrijednosti po 900 USD.

Da li znas da li ce davati svu povijest trgovanja retroaktivno ili se daje stanje nakon datuma uvodenja?

Tako piše na portalima. Ne sjećam se gdje sam pročitao tu vijest, ali sad sam malo tražio i pronašao primjerice ovu vijest. Zanimljivo kako u tekstu članka na jednom mjestu pišu da je umirovljenica iz Dubrovnika ostala bez više od pola milijuna eura jer je nasjela na priču o ulaganju u kriptovalute. Kao da su kriptovalute krive za to ili da će ovaj zakon onemogućiti takve prijevare. Roll Eyes

Quote from: examplens on December 12, 2025, 04:48:32 PM
Znaci li ovo da ce CEX-ovi redovno slati informacije ili ce to raditi samo na zahtev poreskih uprava?

Piše da će CEX-ovi koji djeluju na području EU (zapravo nisam siguran radi li se o CEX-ovima kojima je sjedište u EU ili koji djeluju na području EU) morati automatski podatke dostavljati Poreznoj upravi države u kojoj djeluju, a onda ta Porezna uprava automatski šalje podatke Poreznoj upravi zemlje iz koje je korisnik. Ali iako je zakon stupio na snagu u četvrtak, u članku piše da će sustavno izvještavanje (što god to bilo) početi tek 2027. godine.

Quote from: examplens on December 12, 2025, 04:48:32 PM
Malo po malo, od najavljene finansijske slobode uz Bitkoin, dolazimo do toga da imamo vecu kontrolu nego sa fiat novcem.

Izgleda da je tako. Ali to se zapravo moglo i očekivati. Čim je Bitcoin postao poznat i kad su se uključili ETF-ovi i razne drugi "veliki igrači", bilo je pitanje vremena kad će države shvatiti koliki novac gube na neprijavljenim porezima u kriptovalutama. Ali opet, nije sve tako crno. Oni kojima se da malo istražiti mogu i dalje sve obavljati preko non-KYC CEX-ova, DEX-ova i slično. Čak sam čitao neki dan članak da uopće nije potrebno koristiti mikser za zaštitu privatnosti transakcija. Dovoljno je nekoliko puta napraviti cross-chain bridge i to značajno otežava praćenje transakcija. Nisam siguran koliko je to istina, ali eto... Možda tema o kojoj bi se dalo raspravljati.


3. Post 66165949 (unedited backup) (by Peanutswar) (scraped on Sat Dec 13 02:58:26 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Quote from: examplens on December 12, 2025, 04:31:11 PM
Quote from: Peanutswar on December 12, 2025, 01:05:27 PM
Does anyone experiencing this kind of error in sportsbook or just my side.

Are you using the Chrome browser? They had some strange updates these days, some of the browser addons don't work for me after the last update.
Now, when I wanted to test if I had an error like yours, my Chrome crashed. However, after restartin,g everything is normal. At least that's what it seems

Seems the browser issue again I tried after into different profile with the betpanda and seems same error and afterwards I tried to test it out with the Microsoft edge and it seems works fine without problem in loading, I cleared my cache now.

After I opened my account now I got a message received from the betpanda I thought a cashback instead I got this free spins!



4. Post 66165841 (unedited backup) (by logfiles) (scraped on Sat Dec 13 00:59:25 CET 2025) in Forget about exchanger search! Use BestChange!:
Quote from: hugeblack on December 09, 2025, 07:07:05 AM
UI has changed drastically. I thought the directexchange was happening within the site, but it still redirects you with a referral link.
I think direct exchange means exchange one asset directly to another, like BTC to USDT
While multistage exchange while from let say BTC to XRP and then to USDT. Apparently, a user can even earn some "profit" from this.

Quote from: examplens on December 10, 2025, 02:06:39 PM
I saw this, and I was expecting an announcement by the BC team. For some reason, they completely abandoned this thread.
I think they made updates specifically in the Russian board.


5. Post 66165211 (unedited backup) (by Plaguedeath) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 22:22:25 CET 2025) in trust rating issue :
Quote from: examplens on Today at 04:40:19 PM
The OP does not understand the trust rating on this forum. The way his deals look like, it seems like an attempt to raise trust with the help of fake feedback. On November 11, he reset the password, so that after two days, he had some successful trades, of course, without references, but just to take his word for it.
I do not claim that it is so, but I would rather set off a red alarm than believe that real trades are behind those feedbacks.
I think it's a real trade, the one who left him positive feedback is an old user.

But, the way @OP take the positive feedback seriously seems like he has a hidden purpose why he did these trades. If the reason is the buyer can't trust @OP because @OP has no successful trading, it's make sense. However, I didn't find someone complain for @OP didn't have any positive feedback/trade history.


6. Post 66165155 (unedited backup) (by Amphenomenon) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 22:05:13 CET 2025) in trust rating issue :
Quote from: examplens on Today at 04:40:19 PM
Quote from: Zoomic on Today at 04:31:00 PM
Quote from: Mrsats1987 on Today at 02:24:27 AM
Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??
Why you guys keep sending and recieving feedbacks without reference link?
The OP does not understand the trust rating on this forum. The way his deals look like, it seems like an attempt to raise trust with the help of fake feedback. On November 11, he reset the password, so that after two days, he had some successful trades, of course, without references, but just to take his word for it.
I do not claim that it is so, but I would rather set off a red alarm than believe that real trades are behind those feedbacks.
The fact that Op specializes in collectibles, looking at his post history, this makes his trust more questionable with none with a references.

It is better to be cautious when doing business with Op especially currently.


7. Post 66164821 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 20:39:32 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 04:31:11 PM
Quote from: Peanutswar on Today at 01:05:27 PM
Does anyone experiencing this kind of error in sportsbook or just my side.

Are you using the Chrome browser? They had some strange updates these days, some of the browser addons don't work for me after the last update.
Now, when I wanted to test if I had an error like yours, my Chrome crashed. However, after restartin,g everything is normal. At least that's what it seems

Tried logging in using chrome (desktop), firefox (mobile), as well as some other browsers including TOR, no issue from my end! It's probably a user sided bug!
Anyway, in most of the cases, the most simplest fastest and easiest solution for me was a quick restart and clearing the cache! Works every time!


8. Post 66164706 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 20:13:19 CET 2025) in [ LIST] Scam Accusation Cases Against Casino Platform on The Forum:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:14:45 AM
A list like this requires regular updates (like any similar list), especially if it deals with the reputation of other services. It can be a demanding job and it all depends on the OP and how much time he have to keep it updated.
As far as I can see, there is a gap of 6 months of inactivity here, so that only confirms my conclusion.

I umm... actually update them weekly, during Sunday [initially], but I am well aware that my next update is about one month overdue. Life just currently take the better of me and [though it doesn't justify my lack of weekly update for other "real" cases] most of the cases on SA are currently about BC and INR of which I don't consider as a SA and thus won't add to the list [TBH, it's because if I add those cases that resolves in days after escalated, I'll run out of space very very quickly].

The gap of 6 months inactivity is because an update doesn't bump the thread. And [if I may be honest and didn't mean any offense] I don't want to post a "bump" just to bring this thread to the first page because I don't feel like posting meaningless post and the "bump" post itself is [in my very personal opinion] sounds very narcisisstic.


9. Post 66163594 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 15:43:55 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:11:59 PM
Quote from: NotATether on Today at 11:11:07 AM
That mixer was a scam, and under conventional moderation it would've been banned from the forum ages ago. So it's not really representative of the full situation tbh.
That's exactly what it is. The fact that that mixer was a scam, you know that because you edit the list of active mixers, because you regularly follow many of them (and a certain number of people from here). Bitcointalk is still one of the more reliable sources of information, and the limited discussion about mixers doesn't help.

And that's exactly what i meant in my last reply. It's fully understandable that forum policy can cut with advertisements for mixers in all its kinds, however discussions about a particular mixer whether it's scam or legitimate shouldn't be banned or limited. A stick thread notice can help introducing the limits to general discussions in specific boards such as Scam and Accusations board or Service Discussion board. Just my two cents.


10. Post 66162854 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 12:11:08 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:04:53 AM
Recently, a one mixer was seized, before that, there were a couple of complaints about it, where users reported delays or not receiving Bitcoin at all. We cannot know whether a more open discussion would help in these cases, but it is certainly necessary to discuss it freely. At least for prevention. However, it is not even possible to mention most mixers due to word filtering.

It has been discussed many times in this thread as well. I believe that no excuse is good enough for someone who lost money, and perhaps he could have received useful warning information here.

That mixer was a scam, and under conventional moderation it would've been banned from the forum ages ago. So it's not really representative of the full situation tbh.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on December 11, 2025, 06:59:33 PM
Not that I want to push things into any direction, but isn't it hypocritical that services like Wasabi coordinators, Whirlpool servers, or Joinmarket are allowed to be advertised? From a legal point of view, these services are treated equally with mixers, and the arrest of the Samourai developers in the name of money laundering clears this out further. The fact that mixers require to forfeit custody of coins does not amplify their legal exposure.

I just don't see how being custodial is a requirement to consider it illicit in the eyes of the government. Either all privacy enhancing services can be used to launder money, custodial or not, and thus must be discriminated in this forum, or they mustn't.

I am convinced that if Monero was a service, it's developers would've been arrested and charged by now. (Not for tax evasion a la fluffypony but for MSB voliation charges)

But I don't think feds are particularly interested in coinjoin software. Samourai only got seized because they were loudmouths, and if they had managed to control their indignation then none of this would've happened.


11. Post 66161687 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 02:00:43 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
I think cases where innocent people losing money to fake mixers is something that will continue. People will always stumble across fake websites using similar names and designs to existing mixers. There will always be scamming and phishing websites regardless of what might be posted in the forum.

It is however prudent to have an easily accessible list about the websites to avoid as it just might help save an innocent person from getting scammed. Whether that list would be available in the forum or elsewhere, having one does make sense.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 12:04:53 AM
Recently, a one mixer was seized, before that, there were a couple of complaints about it, where users reported delays or not receiving Bitcoin at all. We cannot know whether a more open discussion would help in these cases, but it is certainly necessary to discuss it freely. At least for prevention. However, it is not even possible to mention most mixers due to word filtering.

It has been discussed many times in this thread as well. I believe that no excuse is good enough for someone who lost money, and perhaps he could have received useful warning information here.


12. Post 66161597 (unedited backup) (by Husna QA) (scraped on Fri Dec 12 00:57:25 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:22:50 PM
Quote from: Husna QA on Today at 10:06:43 PM
As far as I know, the Bridgoro Beta Test period ended on December 7. However, even several days afterward, when I visited the Bridgoro website, the information about the beta test was still being displayed.

The test period was extended because at some point, they took a break in order to resolve all the deficiencies identified up to that point. Beta testing was officially completed yesterday, and rewards were paid out today.
Given that the team currently has a lot of things to fix bugs, replacing this banner is probably not their priority. Finally, the project is still in the beta phase, and the official start is only expected in January.

Previously, I also tried to answer it based on the information I found in the Bitgoro Telegram channel;

Quote from: Husna QA on December 09, 2025, 11:53:40 AM
Quote from: joniboini on December 09, 2025, 11:04:31 AM
Tadi ane mengunjungi website buat lihat web ini, tapi ane masih dapat notice kalau websitenya masih dalam beta om? Apakah maksudnya disini program beta test di forum dengan hadiah itu sudah selesai tapi webnya masih dalam kondisi beta? Soalnya kalau dibaca dinoticenya kesannya user masih bisa kontribusi di periode testing ini dan dapat reward.

Berdasarkan informasi yang saya dapatkan per 8 Desember 2025 kemarin dari channel telegrammnya, ringkasnya Bridgoro masih dalam tahap perbaikan setelah mendapatkan banyak input dari para penguji selama masa Beta test tersebut. Perilisan Bridgoro ke publik kemungkinan tertunda untuk keperluan tersebut (perbaikan bug, dll.), dan diperkirakan jadwal peluncurannya pada Januari 2026. Kedepannya project Bridgoro juga kemungkinan akan dikembangkan tidak hanya pada P2P exchange - no-KYC.

Untuk informasi lebih detail mengenai hal tersebut diatas bisa dilihat di:
https://t.me/bridgoro_exchange/20
---
Based on the information I obtained on December 8, 2025 from their Telegram channel, in summary, Bridgoro is still undergoing improvements after receiving a lot of feedback from testers during the Beta Test period. The public release of Bridgoro is likely delayed for this purpose (bug fixes, etc.), and the launch is expected to take place in January 2026. Going forward, the Bridgoro project may also be developed beyond just a no-KYC P2P exchange.

For more detailed information regarding the above, you can refer to:
https://t.me/bridgoro_exchange/20


13. Post 66158342 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 10:12:32 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
Quote from: bitmover on December 10, 2025, 10:46:18 PM
Quote from: examplens on December 10, 2025, 08:29:13 PM
Quote from: LoyceV on December 10, 2025, 06:51:10 PM
A new mixer from the Seychelles announced itself on Bitcointalk 4 days ago, and started a signature campaign today. It's pretending to be an "exchange" that can split deposits into multiple wallets "100% private without KYC":


This is a clear violation of the mixer ban.
I suspect that theymos will be ruthless with this service, although I would prefer to see customization, and Splitnow to remove the part of the service that is considered a mixer.

Although when they explain it, it is unclear to me how we got into a problem with mixers and where the narrative of "money laundering" in some crypto transactions came from.
Quote from: splitnow on December 08, 2025, 07:44:35 PM
Our service is not a mixer - it's designed to make it easier for users, specifically businesses, to keep BTC and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets while remaining flexible with payments. With SplitNOW you can pay out any cryptocurrency to up to 100 people at once, in a single transaction. This is payment infrastructure, not a mixer service. The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.

I don't think this is exactly a mixer. Certainly it is good to call theymos attention to it, so he can decide to be more flexible or not about this ban. And take a closer look at the service.

But I think that soon all exchange without KYC may be consider a mixer if there is no flexibility in the mixer ban.
This service did not strike me as a mixer too. However, sending coin type x to get the same coin type x is considered as a mixer according to theymos description somewhere where x = Bitcoin. When we think of a mixer we consider a single service, a service provider that take your Bitcoin and after a given time of delay it gives you your Bitcoin back after taking some fees. But in service like SplitNOW you are not only restricted to a single service. You are:
1. Using it to process a multi payment for you by staying anonymous. Yes, you can anonymize your own coins too. Depending how you are using it when it's same coin.
2. You are using it as an exchange with an option to receive multiple other currency.
3. You are using it as an aggregator
There are many other purpose can be served by SplitNOW where with a mixing service that we have in mind only serve a single purpose.


14. Post 66158192 (unedited backup) (by GazetaBitcoin) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 09:26:49 CET 2025) in LoyceV's Avatar for Rent [first 🦊YEAR🦊 (84 weeks) rented out]:
Quote from: apogio on December 06, 2025, 08:26:44 PM
December 6th, 2023 I wore the Foxpup's merit cycling club avatar for the first time. I'm celebrating 2 years today. I'm happy to be a member of this club.

Habby birthday, padawan!!!

Quote from: apogio on December 06, 2025, 08:26:44 PM
@GazetaBitcoin, do you remember how you frightened me?

Loooooooooool! How could I forget that?

Quote from: NeuroticFish on December 08, 2025, 09:07:47 PM
I have the feeling that I've offended somebody with my avatar stunt.

Now you did to NF what I did to you. See? Smiley You scared him!


Quote from: examplens on December 05, 2025, 12:50:40 PM
What did I just see?  Embarrassed

Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=459836
Satofan44    2025-11-22    Reference    Alt account of LauraV.

This reminded me of wolwoo, for some reason Smiley



15. Post 66158151 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 09:14:56 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
Quote from: examplens on December 10, 2025, 08:29:13 PM
Although when they explain it, it is unclear to me how we got into a problem with mixers and where the narrative of "money laundering" in some crypto transactions came from.
Quote from: splitnow on December 08, 2025, 07:44:35 PM
Our service is not a mixer -~ The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.
It's not the first mixer that claims not to be a mixer. But theymos' defition in the OP says otherwise.
Let's say you're a business and want to make a "send to many" transaction like my screenshot above. You have 1 Bitcoin and want to send it to 3 addresses. Which option would you choose:

Quote from: Ambatman on December 10, 2025, 09:04:47 PM
The truth is privacy is just a fairytale dream.
Real privacy is more challenging than paying someone $1200 to split your Bitcoin into 3 parts.

Quote from: bitmover on December 10, 2025, 10:46:18 PM
I don't think this is exactly a mixer.
In that case you can tell me which one of 3 points in theymos' OP doesn't fit this website Wink

Quote
But I think that soon all exchange without KYC may be consider a mixer if there is no flexibility in the mixer ban.
Normal exchanges don't fit this criterion:
Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 11:15:25 AM
Something is considered a mixer if it meets all of these requirements:
 1. It has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property.

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 07:46:26 AM
I am not at all happy that people are now doing witch-hunts to enforce the ban.
What exactly are we accomplishing here?
I'd say this goes back to the reason mixers were banned in the first place:
Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 11:15:25 AM
Bitcointalk.org aims to allow about as much freedom as is reasonably possible. But this is not a darknet forum, and with mixers looking "grayer and grayer", it's no longer reasonably possible to allow linking to mixers. Even though "a cryptocurrency mixing service is not necessarily illegal," a clear pattern has emerged where mixers pop up, last for a little while, and then get taken down by law enforcement once they get too big. Allowing mixers to be posted on bitcointalk.org before they seemingly-inevitably get declared illegal and seized is not sustainable. Therefore, promoting mixers will no longer be allowed, similarly to how darknet sites are already disallowed.

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 07:46:26 AM
It is an open secret that everyone uses Binance, KuCoin, Bybit and other large exchanges for money laundering now, as evidenced by the fact that investigators can do fuck-all once they trace funds to an exchange deposit address. They advertise everywhere, including here indirectly via users who advise via word of mouth.

Even the mixers themselves are largely relying on exchange accounts now. They know the governments do not care (re: Trump's CZ pardon). Yet government only goes after mixer sites.

I wonder why nobody is holding them accountable for their (in)actions?
Those are valid questions. Just like banks are still laundering money and get away with a fine.
The Dutch BNR Crypto Update just compared the massive prison sentences in crypto to the complete lack punishment when banks fucked up big time in 2008. It's almost as if governments are protecting their based-on-nothing fiat money.


16. Post 66158022 (unedited backup) (by Lakai01) (scraped on Thu Dec 11 08:20:14 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: examplens on December 10, 2025, 01:07:16 PM
There's no way this could happen. At least two teams are better than Liverpool, and probably four. A crazy bet has a better chance of Aston Villa winning the PL than Liverpool. It will be very difficult for Liverpool to reach the top 5 this season, because their problems are not just a few bad games. The current L'pool team has never looked good on the field, and I think the team with Isak, Wirtz...
Unfortunately (as a Liverpool-fan) I have to agree.

It's looking tough for Liverpool this season. As defending champions, they're surprisingly sitting 10th after 15 games with 23 points and a 0 goal difference (!). You are right, structural issues seem evident, and without key additions like Isak or Wirtz (both are not "present" anymore), climbing back will be challenging. Of course, it is still mid-season and there is room for turnaround, but title odds are long and I am not sure if they can manage to perform this turnaround ...



17. Post 66157233 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 23:46:19 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:29:13 PM
Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 06:51:10 PM
A new mixer from the Seychelles announced itself on Bitcointalk 4 days ago, and started a signature campaign today. It's pretending to be an "exchange" that can split deposits into multiple wallets "100% private without KYC":


This is a clear violation of the mixer ban.
I suspect that theymos will be ruthless with this service, although I would prefer to see customization, and Splitnow to remove the part of the service that is considered a mixer.

Although when they explain it, it is unclear to me how we got into a problem with mixers and where the narrative of "money laundering" in some crypto transactions came from.
Quote from: splitnow on December 08, 2025, 07:44:35 PM
Our service is not a mixer - it's designed to make it easier for users, specifically businesses, to keep BTC and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets while remaining flexible with payments. With SplitNOW you can pay out any cryptocurrency to up to 100 people at once, in a single transaction. This is payment infrastructure, not a mixer service. The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.

I don't think this is exactly a mixer. Certainly it is good to call theymos attention to it, so he can decide to be more flexible or not about this ban.

But splitting UTXO in different wallets isn't a mixer neither a coinjoin. As far as I understand this service, you won't receive other people coins, only when exchanging.


18. Post 66157031 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 22:48:14 CET 2025) in [ANN] SplitNOW.io | Swap to 1-100 wallets | Binance & 40+ CEXs | Zero KYC:
Quote from: splitnow on December 09, 2025, 07:44:56 PM
Quote from: coupable on December 08, 2025, 11:38:26 PM
Quote from: splitnow on December 08, 2025, 07:44:35 PM
Quote from: examplens on December 08, 2025, 11:03:22 AM
Quote from: NotATether on December 08, 2025, 08:26:22 AM
No, not remotely.

A mixer would be if you send the service BTC and you get another grade of BTC back.

But exchanges swap one crypto for another, so they don't qualify.
SplitNOW has the ability to "swap" BTC for BTC or ETH for ETH for a fee. This is a mixing feature, so this service can be considered a combination of mixer-swap.
I remember that eXch disabled such an option in order not to be subject to banning from this forum.

Our service is not a mixer - it's designed to make it easier for users, specifically businesses, to keep BTC and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets while remaining flexible with payments. With SplitNOW you can pay out any cryptocurrency to up to 100 people at once, in a single transaction. This is payment infrastructure, not a mixer service. The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.
This is still can be considered a mixing service as well. Let's say I have 100 XMR from unknown source and i want to swap them for USDT without being exposed. I can use a VPN to access your service and receive clean USDT without my identity being exposed. And even be more anonymous by splitting the amount between multiple addresses. I doubt the authorities would accept let you run such a service without enforcing KYC, otherwise you can find yourself involved in accusations of supporting frauds.

If I understood you well, you will act as intermediary between the user and the exchanger. Apart from this, anybody can split his funds manually or by using some tools to send to multiple addresses available online.

What you are describing is a swap between one cryptocurrency to another. Any privacy or anonymity from this action is a result of one of the assets (XMR) being a privacy token, not from our exchange service. If you replace XMR with BTC in your example, the transaction is no longer private - therefore, the anonymity in your example comes entirely from XMR. It is legally permissible to provide swaps between privacy tokens, and it is not considered a mixer - merely an exchange.
It still has a touch of a mixer as no account creation is required. In the same example let's change XMR with BTC. If I send you BTC and then swap it to ETH, then send the ETH again and swap it to BTC again. Doesn't this mean I get fresh BTC considering always that the first deposit was from a stolen funds and I use VPN to access the service and no accouts or KYC are required.

And if one of the addresses is flagged later after completing the swap, what you plan to do with authorities?

I am not against privacy and I wish there are many exchanges offering privacy swaps, but some questions are worth the answer.


19. Post 66156892 (unedited backup) (by Ambatman) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 22:04:49 CET 2025) in Mixers to be banned:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:29:13 PM

A new mixer from the Seychelles
Although when they explain it, it is unclear to me how we got into a problem with mixers and where the narrative of "money laundering" in some crypto transactions came from.

From what have garner and been sticking with is that the forum is against anything that improves privacy
And promotes Non KYC policy for all customers.
I know some may argue with my usage of anything but that's how I am really picturing it.
The truth is privacy is just a fairytale dream.


20. Post 66156756 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 21:22:13 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:30:03 AM
Even if you send directly from a private wallet, without any checks (when we are talking about Bitcoin), it usually takes at least 10 minutes for the transaction to be processed in the next block.
yeah, but the 27 minutes here is not time waiting for a nrtwork confirmatoin, it's just how long it took for them to send it, and i don't think they would need to manually verfty such a small amount for a rank 10 player.

maybe the hot wallet was empty or something, who knows.
but one thing for sure, the withdrawals are not instant, but they are usually very fast, i have a few withdrawals before, and all were sent within 5 minutes.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:30:03 AM
Yes, I saw a quick withdrawal, but 27 minutes is certainly not something to worry about.
i would only start worying if it's +24 hours and nothing has been sent.


21. Post 66155803 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 17:11:43 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:44:57 AM
Quote from: katanic97 on December 09, 2025, 10:16:48 PM
Quote from: mitchr4 on December 09, 2025, 01:25:53 PM
Considering that Inter and PSV are both playing at home and their recent performances really solid, it would be interesting to combine them in a multi bet with odds of x6.
Real Madrid always faces difficulties when playing against England teams, whether it's a curse or something else. However, I believe they can still easily get 3 points against Man City, even though they just lost heavily to Celta Vigo. Hopefully, Real Madrid can bounce back from that defeat.

I skipped Inter, i played a straight win on PSV and of course they lost. I underestimated Alvarez and the team, but still, PSV put up good resistance. Real Madrid should be able to recover from the defeat, but City is not an easy opponent. It seems to me that both teams could score, because i really don’t know who could win that match, but i do expect goals. Tomorrow i need to bet smartly , hopefully a lot smarter than today.
The latter phase of LS often brought "unexpected" results. Many bigger teams don't even make a special effort, because they don't want the risk of injury, the most important players are often saved for currently more important games in the national league. I would not be surprised if Real-City is a tactical and boring game, because they are sure that they will collect a sufficient number of points against outsiders.
This is the stage when all predictions are very uncertain, because many teams simply do not have a "must-win" motive.
What you’re saying makes sense, but when you look at the table you realize that City and Real aren’t in such a good position at all. Real are 6th, City are 12th. The goal is to be in the top 8, so in my opinion this match should be open and full of chances. The new champions league format is better for me, because when there was a group stage, teams could calculate more and play tactically. Here, the "big" clubs still aim to qualify for the top 8


22. Post 66155534 (unedited backup) (by Hulk990) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 16:01:37 CET 2025) in Warning: Cloudbet Review Campaign Started Aug 12 - I Still Haven’t Been Paid:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 02:54:06 PM
Quote from: Hulk990 on Today at 02:29:47 PM
Where is the transparency of Cloudbet Review Campaign?
Scammer @Cloudbet and Scammer @Hhampuz
Why you guys are hiding? Why are you guys afraid to come forward and talk about this publicly? If you guys are not scammers then why are not you guys giving a clear explanation about the contest?

Stop trolling. The crap you wrote is not a review, nor is it worth a single cent. If you don't understand why it's like that, then obviously it's not worth explaining to you, you simply don't have enough capacity to understand.
If you were paid for the crap you wrote, both Cloudbet and Hhampuz would risk their reputation for buying shitty feedback.

You Stop defending scammers. Stop supporting them. They won’t pay you for flattering them, you fool.


23. Post 66155350 (unedited backup) (by Fivestar4everMVP) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 15:01:37 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:36:39 AM
Quote from: The Cryptovator on Today at 08:15:31 AM
OP seems inactive for a month; I hope everything is fine, or I'm not sure if the BC team is active with any other accounts. I want to ask, have you noticed another fiat withdrawal issue on the scam accusation board? If not, then you must notice that and move forward to solve the fiat issues. The withdrawal seems successful on your user dashboard, but the user hasn't received it in his bank account. That means it's your local fiat agent has issues like before. You have to cross-check the issue with the local fiat agent and solve this.
I confirm this, and it can be said that it is not accidental.
For some other reasons, I have been following their sub on Reddit for a while. It is quite neglected, plus there are regularly accusations of withdrawal marked as successful even though it is not, or even of not adding a deposit.
Support seems to be nonexistent.
A friend of mine had this same issue with this casino some weeks back, though it was later resolved, but my friend had to borrow money to sort out the issue he intended sorting out with the money he was withdrawing from this casino..

He requested a withdrawal in Fiat, the withdrawal was marked as successful but he waited several hours and the money did not arrive on his account, he later contacted customer care and it took them over 4 hours to respond, long story short, the matter was later resolved in 4 days and this left my guys absolutely disappointed that he swore never to gamble on this casino again, according to him, the casino disappointed him at a crucial time and if not that he had a means of borrowing, a lot of things could have gone wrong with what he urgently needed that money to sort.


24. Post 66155228 (unedited backup) (by Fivestar4everMVP) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 14:20:55 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 01:07:16 PM
Quote from: icopress on December 09, 2025, 04:00:45 PM
Quote from: rammy2k2 on December 09, 2025, 03:52:13 PM
Liverpool always been my favourite from Premier League ,  their power and determination to come back from any negative score is amazing
Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about!

They still have a fantastic roster. If you look at any period of time when Iskak was in form, you'll see that he was brutally dominant against any team. He's just a little lacking in confidence, but with more minutes on the court, I think he'll get it back.
There's no way this could happen. At least two teams are better than Liverpool, and probably four. A crazy bet has a better chance of Aston Villa winning the PL than Liverpool. It will be very difficult for Liverpool to reach the top 5 this season, because their problems are not just a few bad games. The current L'pool team has never looked good on the field, and I think the team with Isak, Wirtz...
I honestly have to agree with you completely because even if Liverpool end up waking up now to start dominating every game they play, it will still be very difficult, like as good as impossible for the to win that Premier league this season due to the number of games and points they've lost in this season already, the best they can do Is achieve a higher ranking on the league table, which I still believe that reachinf the 5th place may as well be difficult cus no matter how good they become, they can't possibly win every match from now to the finish of this season.

Anyways, I would add that currently, I can't tell which team has the better chance of winning the league title this season, because I was believing would have started messing around and it's very disappointing.


25. Post 66154745 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Wed Dec 10 11:32:50 CET 2025) in 🎲 BetFury.io|⚡️ Free BTC|⚡️ $3mln Dividends paid|⚡️ $200K Jackpots|⚡️ $1mln Cas:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:30:03 AM
Even if you send directly from a private wallet, without any checks (when we are talking about Bitcoin), it usually takes at least 10 minutes for the transaction to be processed in the next block.
Yes, I saw a quick withdrawal, but 27 minutes is certainly not something to worry about.

Yeah, for Bitcoin it takes about 10 minutes, but sometimes you get a stuck transaction and then you wait for half an hour or even more. It's not that common, but it happens. I never used Litecoin so I'm not sure how often there is a stuck transaction on their blockchain, but I'm sure it happens from time to time.


26. Post 66152722 (unedited backup) (by splitnow) (scraped on Tue Dec 9 20:45:01 CET 2025) in [ANN] SplitNOW.io | Swap to 1-100 wallets | Binance & 40+ CEXs | Zero KYC:
Quote from: coupable on December 08, 2025, 11:38:26 PM
Quote from: splitnow on December 08, 2025, 07:44:35 PM
Quote from: examplens on December 08, 2025, 11:03:22 AM
Quote from: NotATether on December 08, 2025, 08:26:22 AM
No, not remotely.

A mixer would be if you send the service BTC and you get another grade of BTC back.

But exchanges swap one crypto for another, so they don't qualify.
SplitNOW has the ability to "swap" BTC for BTC or ETH for ETH for a fee. This is a mixing feature, so this service can be considered a combination of mixer-swap.
I remember that eXch disabled such an option in order not to be subject to banning from this forum.

Our service is not a mixer - it's designed to make it easier for users, specifically businesses, to keep BTC and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets while remaining flexible with payments. With SplitNOW you can pay out any cryptocurrency to up to 100 people at once, in a single transaction. This is payment infrastructure, not a mixer service. The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.
This is still can be considered a mixing service as well. Let's say I have 100 XMR from unknown source and i want to swap them for USDT without being exposed. I can use a VPN to access your service and receive clean USDT without my identity being exposed. And even be more anonymous by splitting the amount between multiple addresses. I doubt the authorities would accept let you run such a service without enforcing KYC, otherwise you can find yourself involved in accusations of supporting frauds.

If I understood you well, you will act as intermediary between the user and the exchanger. Apart from this, anybody can split his funds manually or by using some tools to send to multiple addresses available online.

What you are describing is a swap between one cryptocurrency to another. Any privacy or anonymity from this action is a result of one of the assets (XMR) being a privacy token, not from our exchange service. If you replace XMR with BTC in your example, the transaction is no longer private - therefore, the anonymity in your example comes entirely from XMR. It is legally permissible to provide swaps between privacy tokens, and it is not considered a mixer - merely an exchange.


27. Post 66149550 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Tue Dec 9 00:38:31 CET 2025) in [ANN] SplitNOW.io | Swap to 1-100 wallets | Binance & 40+ CEXs | Zero KYC:
Quote from: splitnow on Today at 07:44:35 PM
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:03:22 AM
Quote from: NotATether on Today at 08:26:22 AM
No, not remotely.

A mixer would be if you send the service BTC and you get another grade of BTC back.

But exchanges swap one crypto for another, so they don't qualify.
SplitNOW has the ability to "swap" BTC for BTC or ETH for ETH for a fee. This is a mixing feature, so this service can be considered a combination of mixer-swap.
I remember that eXch disabled such an option in order not to be subject to banning from this forum.

Our service is not a mixer - it's designed to make it easier for users, specifically businesses, to keep BTC and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets while remaining flexible with payments. With SplitNOW you can pay out any cryptocurrency to up to 100 people at once, in a single transaction. This is payment infrastructure, not a mixer service. The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.
This is still can be considered a mixing service as well. Let's say I have 100 XMR from unknown source and i want to swap them for USDT without being exposed. I can use a VPN to access your service and receive clean USDT without my identity being exposed. And even be more anonymous by splitting the amount between multiple addresses. I doubt the authorities would accept let you run such a service without enforcing KYC, otherwise you can find yourself involved in accusations of supporting frauds.

If I understood you well, you will act as intermediary between the user and the exchanger. Apart from this, anybody can split his funds manually or by using some tools to send to multiple addresses available online.


28. Post 66148753 (unedited backup) (by splitnow) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 20:44:37 CET 2025) in [ANN] SplitNOW.io | Swap to 1-100 wallets | Binance & 40+ CEXs | Zero KYC:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:03:22 AM
Quote from: NotATether on Today at 08:26:22 AM
No, not remotely.

A mixer would be if you send the service BTC and you get another grade of BTC back.

But exchanges swap one crypto for another, so they don't qualify.
SplitNOW has the ability to "swap" BTC for BTC or ETH for ETH for a fee. This is a mixing feature, so this service can be considered a combination of mixer-swap.
I remember that eXch disabled such an option in order not to be subject to banning from this forum.

Our service is not a mixer - it's designed to make it easier for users, specifically businesses, to keep BTC and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets while remaining flexible with payments. With SplitNOW you can pay out any cryptocurrency to up to 100 people at once, in a single transaction. This is payment infrastructure, not a mixer service. The in-kind asset swaps are designed to make our multi-sending feature as versatile as possible.


29. Post 66148531 (unedited backup) (by icopress) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 19:32:43 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: examplens on December 07, 2025, 02:52:43 PM
Tottenham won yesterday, I hope you took some money there.
I think Tottenham, Man United are the worst bets right now. They can beat anyone, and they can also lose to anyone. Probably the most unstable teams, maybe Liverpool can be added to them, although it's no longer a surprise for them when they don't win.
All my bets where I picked Man United ended up as losses. So the decision is that I no longer consider them as an option in any direction.
I did it! 🎅🎅🎅

It was stupid to miss this game, considering Kudus was back and Tottenham were playing at home!

Quote


30. Post 66148046 (unedited backup) (by Pieq) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 17:52:43 CET 2025) in [ANN] Fully Private, No-KYC/AML Crypto Swaps | BITCOIN ⇄ MONERO:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:12:16 AM
@Pieq, Considering that you are a total newbie here and you don't have any reliable references, using the escrow service is mandatory. Without it, expect to be considered high risk.

Quote from: Pieq on December 07, 2025, 05:34:09 PM
Quote from: NotATether on December 07, 2025, 12:23:53 PM
What are your liquidity reserves for XMR and BTC?

Since this is a small and new service liquidity is limited, but I plan on increasing it as needed.
If someone needs a swap that requires more liquidity than I currently have available, I'm always open to discussing it.
It's possible I can still handle the request by securing the needed liquidity within a few days, if the user agrees to wait.
You gave a rather incomplete answer. It would be very useful if you could provide information range in which you can provide the service. What is the minimum, and what is the maximum that you can process in one swap?
Today is 2025, with an unstable market, waiting a few days for a swap is pointless, to say the least.

I agree with you, I should've given numbers, I apologize for the oversight.

Basically, my liquidity for this service is tied to my personal holdings, which can fluctuate quite a bit on a daily basis.
To ensure I have enough on hand, I've set aside $2k in dedicated wallets for swaps, as I don't expect larger trades at this point, given my new status here.
However, I am able to handle larger transactions once the need arises.

When I mentioned that users may need to wait a few days for larger trades, I was referring to high 5 figure to low 6 figure transactions, which is the upper limit of what I can access for swaps.

There’s no minimum. Users are welcome to come to me for swaps as small as they need.


31. Post 66147847 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 17:15:20 CET 2025) in Mempool Observer Topic:
Quote from: FeeBuddy on Today at 04:11:11 PM
     

Hey guys, I was finally able to update FeeBuddy to the more precise estimations, now supporting less than 1 sat/vB estimations of fees.

I will quote users who are active here in the thread:
@examplens @nutildah @stompix @BlackHatCoiner @LoyceV

Maybe I missed someone.


32. Post 66147696 (unedited backup) (by igebotz) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 16:41:02 CET 2025) in JollyGood English Premier League Season: 2020/2021:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:51:47 AM
The title is won by winning "small" games even when the team is not in ideal shape. It is much easier for a manager to motivate a team against a big name than against a team where you are the favourite and victory is mandatory. That is the manager's job and if Arsenal fails, it will be Arteta's fault alone. Such things happen much less often to Pep or Klopp earlier, because they have enough experience to maintain the team.
Probably the best example ever is Sir Alex Ferguson, who very rarely lost to teams outside the top 4, that's why he won titles, even with very average players.

You made a great point except for the last sentence - I need to remind you that he Had Hobb Webb and the entire FA under his Web. He was Late Queen Elizabeth favourite manager and every ref wanted to see the Queen happy. He was a great manager no doubts but.....

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 03:28:01 PM
Maresca has to rotate the squad according to the players he has available. All managers have the same problem, they have to adapt when they are faced with injury problems. On occasion, maybe a mass rotation is required to freshen the team (and maybe the manger will take that action depending on the opposition). We should assess Maresca at the season alongside Guardiola and Arteta. Maybe he is exploring tactics?

Agreed but in our case we didn't have any injuries crisis - Caicedo was the only unavailable player from Barcelona and Arsenal fixtures, he had the entire team and decided to be funny.

Exploring tactics since last season?


33. Post 66147647 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 16:28:01 CET 2025) in JollyGood English Premier League Season: 2020/2021:
Quote from: igebotz on December 07, 2025, 09:26:42 PM
How often have we seen Arteta or Pep rotate more than 10% of their lineups in league games?  You can't develop stability through massive rotation every weekend. That's our major problem.
Maresca has to rotate the squad according to the players he has available. All managers have the same problem, they have to adapt when they are faced with injury problems. On occasion, maybe a mass rotation is required to freshen the team (and maybe the manger will take that action depending on the opposition). We should assess Maresca at the season alongside Guardiola and Arteta. Maybe he is exploring tactics?

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:51:47 AM
The title is won by winning "small" games even when the team is not in ideal shape. It is much easier for a manager to motivate a team against a big name than against a team where you are the favourite and victory is mandatory. That is the manager's job and if Arsenal fails, it will be Arteta's fault alone. Such things happen much less often to Pep or Klopp earlier, because they have enough experience to maintain the team.
Probably the best example ever is Sir Alex Ferguson, who very rarely lost to teams outside the top 4, that's why he won titles, even with very average players.
Arteta and Maresca have not won the Premier League whereas Guardiola has won the Premier League six times. They will have to find their way as they search for their first title. For last few season when Arsenal were challenging for the title, they seemed to have run out of steam towards the latter part of the season and Arteta was (rightly) blamed.

Chelsea were doing well under Maresca last season until they started to drop too many points. It seems as though Chelsea have already started doing the same thing therefore they could be out of the race if they do not start winning games again.


34. Post 66147246 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 14:59:43 CET 2025) in Mempool Observer Topic:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:20:56 AM
What awaits us here? Will the miners pay us to perform transactions?  Grin



@bitmover, is it maybe time to update this algorithm? It doesn't seem to show below 1 sat/vB, unlike what we see on Mempool

I will see what I can do

For now, I am using this API from mempool.space, which wasn`t updated yet

https://mempool.space/api/v1/fees/recommended
Code:
{
  "fastestFee": 2,
  "halfHourFee": 1,
  "hourFee": 1,
  "economyFee": 1,
  "minimumFee": 1
}

I think mempool.space uses the websocket to get this more precise data in their website. I will try to use it later on....


35. Post 66147192 (unedited backup) (by Rruchi man) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 14:48:31 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on Today at 11:35:04 AM
Wolves win win a game at some point in the PL but I don’t think that will be tonight. Wolves are in terrible shape, really terrible team.
If Amorim underrates Wolves and chooses to rotate the team, thinking they must be able to win against Wolves, they may just get the shocker tonight and lose like Chelsea did to Leeds.

It may be too late for him to put his best players back if Wolves score like a goal and grow in confidence in the game.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:42:47 AM
I won't be surprised if Wolves turn into Barca's prime tonight.
Hahaaha Cheesy

It is football, of course; anything can happen. If Grimsby could do it to Manchester United, Wolves can do it.

The odds for Wolves to do it look good.



36. Post 66147140 (unedited backup) (by NotATether) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 14:35:01 CET 2025) in Test:
Quote from: icopress on December 06, 2025, 02:22:51 AM
Quote from: examplens on December 05, 2025, 10:11:20 AM
What a mess with Bitlist threads and the red circle icon. Suddenly, it's everywhere,  Grin It's getting harder and harder to know which one is for what. A small change on the icon adapted to the discussion would be useful, a different colour or maybe not complete the whole circle for discussions about development.
It sounds reasonable, but of those that could be used across various topics, I only see a few worthy emoji. But if we look at it through the lens of social identity, a single symbol for all threads + including the full domain name ... would ultimately benefit the project as a whole.

I think it would make the threads a lot more clearer if you put a one-word subject inside brackets, like this:

Code:
[SIG] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
Code:
[NINJASTIC] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Code:
[TELEGRAM BOT] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Code:
[ANN] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

or some variation of that.

Keep it short and simple, so it doesn't get cut off in the browser HTML.


37. Post 66146945 (unedited backup) (by liuka) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 13:31:49 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on Today at 11:35:04 AM
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:42:47 AM
Wolves are in a desperate shape, perhaps the worst team that has played in the Premier League, they have a desperate series of defeats. But when it comes to Man United, anything is possible. I won't be surprised if Wolves turn into Barca's prime tonight.
Man United has knocked me down some very interesting wins more than once, so even when it should be obvious that they will win, I will not take them into account.

Wolves win win a game at some point in the PL but I don’t think that will be tonight. Wolves are in terrible shape, really terrible team. Man Utd are far from their former glories but surely they will do what is required tonight to get the 3 points.
But the question is whether the surprise point for Wolves to win tonight will be shown to Manchester United? Indeed, it is unlikely that the away team will lose because if they win by grabbing 3 points tonight, they will be level again with Chelsea 25 points, so the advantage for Manchester United to win.
Still, your doubts must be where this team is also not very good, sometimes against low teams also play badly usually.


38. Post 66146804 (unedited backup) (by LFC_Bitcoin) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 12:35:07 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:
Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:42:47 AM
Wolves are in a desperate shape, perhaps the worst team that has played in the Premier League, they have a desperate series of defeats. But when it comes to Man United, anything is possible. I won't be surprised if Wolves turn into Barca's prime tonight.
Man United has knocked me down some very interesting wins more than once, so even when it should be obvious that they will win, I will not take them into account.

Wolves win win a game at some point in the PL but I don’t think that will be tonight. Wolves are in terrible shape, really terrible team. Man Utd are far from their former glories but surely they will do what is required tonight to get the 3 points.


39. Post 66140181 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 18:59:07 CET 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:
DT 1
     1. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2357 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4315 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1724 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2666 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9933 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 3203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 8882 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5895 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8303 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1658 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6050 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1869 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6339 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1837 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1366 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 12454 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5953 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 6532 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6444 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 3196 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 9222 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +138 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3120 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 677 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3479 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11056 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11196 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 525 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4481 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2365 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 4162 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (57) 19471 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2888 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1312 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 442 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3567 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1107 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3269 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6466 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1801 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4267 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14918 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3074 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +76 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 11029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1298 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1978 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 8992 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3120 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7116 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11206 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1350 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3673 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3149 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19448 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2254 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2389 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2416 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 5180 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5148 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1485 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +41 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 3216 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1870 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1005 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3784 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1543 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1102 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5307 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7454 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1747 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1522 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5053 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 8993 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6069 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2925 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6615 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (13753 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 203: HostFat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9082 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


40. Post 66139520 (unedited backup) (by DiMarxist) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 15:54:55 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: icopress on Today at 02:33:26 AM
Quote from: examplens on December 03, 2025, 08:42:37 PM
Also, I got free bet from a raffle contest
I'm a little surprised that the odds on Arsenal against VIlla is even 1.93, it seems to me a solid chance.
I'd prefer another option... There are several teams from the top leagues (one of them is Tottenham) that are very well-known and generally strong, but they haven't won many matches in a row. They have games again tomorrow, and I'm thinking about making a big bet.

I'm hesitant yet... as I'm left with a bad taste in my mouth from their last game, when I bet and lost about $1,000.  Roll Eyes
Hey manager icopress, sorry for the loss. That is not a small amount and if that amount was loss by some kind of gamblers, there would be a loud cry but I believed you have a thick skin to over such big loss. If you are talking about Tottenham Hotspur vs Brentford match. From the recent matches between the two teams, Tottenham Hotspur has won tremendously against Brentford so if you are supporting them to win it might be a good bet for you. And I wish you all the best to win that game.


41. Post 66139189 (unedited backup) (by virasog) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 14:25:25 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: Lakai01 on Today at 01:18:58 PM
Quote from: mitchr4 on Today at 03:52:29 AM
Quote from: examplens on December 03, 2025, 08:42:37 PM
Also, I got free bet from a raffle contest
I'm a little surprised that the odds on Arsenal against VIlla is even 1.93, it seems to me a solid chance.
A minimum odds requirement of 1.3x for a free bet is pretty low. Most other sportsbooks usually set the minimum at around 1.5-1.8x. Having a free bet that stays active for almost a month is also a big advantage. With that duration, we can wait for our favorite sport to place a bet, especially since some sports are only played at certain times.
This is actually a very useful feature that greatly benefits customers who have won a free bet.

I have also won free bets on other sites, but either they have very high odds requirements (sometimes even over 1.Cool or you have to place the bets within 3 days, which is quite difficult during the week if you specialize in certain sports. This forces you to bet on leagues you don't know anything about or to switch sports completely, both of which are more like gambling and have little to do with "sensible" sports betting.

Well in that case, you can place the bets on the low odds team to win as low odds suggest that the chances for that bet to end up winning are greater.

Also if I was at your place, I would have randomly bet on any team without analysing (if that sports was new to me) because it is a free bet and it's better to try your luck. Three days are enough to place bets, as there are so many match bets available every day and even every hour.


42. Post 66139174 (unedited backup) (by Lakai01) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 14:19:02 CET 2025) in 🐳 @Whale 🐳 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰 #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin:
Quote from: mitchr4 on Today at 03:52:29 AM
Quote from: examplens on December 03, 2025, 08:42:37 PM
Also, I got free bet from a raffle contest
I'm a little surprised that the odds on Arsenal against VIlla is even 1.93, it seems to me a solid chance.
A minimum odds requirement of 1.3x for a free bet is pretty low. Most other sportsbooks usually set the minimum at around 1.5-1.8x. Having a free bet that stays active for almost a month is also a big advantage. With that duration, we can wait for our favorite sport to place a bet, especially since some sports are only played at certain times.
This is actually a very useful feature that greatly benefits customers who have won a free bet.

I have also won free bets on other sites, but either they have very high odds requirements (sometimes even over 1.Cool or you have to place the bets within 3 days, which is quite difficult during the week if you specialize in certain sports. This forces you to bet on leagues you don't know anything about or to switch sports completely, both of which are more like gambling and have little to do with “sensible” sports betting.