Da, zapravo nije bilo većeg pada, cijena je pala nekih 4-5 % što nije ništa u odnosu na neke puno veće padove u prošlosti.
Priopćenje Binance-a da će nadoknaditi sve gubitke i nastaviti s poslovanjem je očito umirilo tržište.
Ovo je sada postala glavna vijest u svim medijima, i domaćim i stranim i crypto skeptici su upravo dobili još 1 dokaz da je crypto jedna velika prevara i da je dobro da nisu ušli u tu priču  
Vidim da valjda u 95 % vijesti svi spominju kao gotovu i potvrđenu činjenicu da iza ovoga stoji TraderTraitor, hakerska grupa povezana sa Sjevernom Korejom.
Izgleda da je najjači dokaz za to činjenica, koju su otkrili istražitelji Chainalysisa, kako se sredstva ukradena s Binancea miješaju sa sredstvima ukradenim prošlomjesečnim iskorištavanjem Bitgeta, a to je bilo pripisano sjevernokorejancima.
Dakle, ako je to točno, sjevernokorejski lider Kim je upravo dobio najljepši božićni poklon, i još love za razvijanje njihovog nuklearnog programa.

Looking at some questions that were not responded to by the ComCASH team, it seems that there is indeed a problem related to the site, as said by @examplens .

And I think @icopress need to know about this if it is not notified by the ComCASH team, because ANN campaigns and signatures still use the comcash.exchange link and comcash.cc.
while the link in ANN has changed to comcash.dev and comcash.app.

If we look more closely, there are the following peculiarities:

• link comcash.exchange and comcash.cc. does not have a favicon
• link comcash.dev and comcash.app have favicons

Note this Logo also on the site:

Looking at the logo on the site: comcash.exchange & comcash.cc looks like it was hacked because there is an extra letter R (edited logo)

Since Yobit has been running continuously since 2014, its strange ppsition has been discussed over the past ten years. In my opinion, there are two main reasons this platform continues to function despite the criticism it received due to its lack of transparency and unavailable support channels:
- Yobit is an ideal nokyc exchanger for users prefer to remain anonymous. Users may find it appropriate in a centralized market.
- Some reviews [1] reveal that Yobit is the biggest cryptocurrency market ever, supporting over 9000 trading pairs.

[1] https://www.bitdegree.org/crypto/yobit-review

Ma ja mislim da osim ovog sinoćnjeg dumpa neće biti nekog pretjeranog utjecaja na tržište. Mislim da ni nakon ByBit hacka nije bilo nekog utjecaja. Naravno da sad razni influenceri pokušavaju uloviti koji lajk pišući o tome kako Binance sad mora kupiti BTC za milijardu dolara ali naravno da nitko neće lupiti market buy BTC za milijardu dolara.

Baš sam danas na Coingecko gledao koliki je dnevni promet na Binance. Naravno, to je ono što burza prijavi. Ali ajmo se praviti da je točno. Nisam gledao zadnja 24 sata jer je zbog hacka bio malo veći promet nego inače. Ovo je graf prometa za zadnja 3 mjeseca:


Ako uzmemo neki odokativni prosjek od 9 milijardi dolara tjedno, uz 0.1%, ispada da Binance dnevno samo od trading fee-eva zaradi 9 milijuna dolara. To je samo dnevna zarada od fee-a, a gdje je još naplata listinga i ostale stvari za koje ne znamo. Naravno, ovo je samo gruba procjena jer niti trading fee nije isti za sve korisnike. Ali mislim da je po tome vidljivo da zarađuju stvarno veliku lovu i nije ni čudo da mogu pokriti 6 milijardi dolara štete iz vlastitih izvora.

A što se tiče većine drugih burzi, naravno da bi krađa 6 milijardi dolara bio kraj. Ali mislim da kod drugih burzi nije moguće napraviti takvu krađu jer jednostavno nemaju toliko kripta u hot walletima.

I thought they didn't even exist anymore; given the many scam allegations against them, I assumed the owner would fear arrest and simply vanish. It seems they are quite bold though I must confess, I’m truly shocked to see that they currently hold the 145th position on CoinMarketCap, with a trading volume of $79,542,897.45 over the last 24 hours. I’d prefer to believe this volume is fake, because if it’s real, it just goes to show that many people place no value on their own money. So, I decided to check their website to see if there really are people who don't value their money and to my surprise:



Unfortunately, they still have customers. I can’t believe the big scam exchange in the world still has users. how can anyone in this world use YoBit? The last time I used it many years ago,  I submitted a support ticket that only got a response years later, I had already left the exchange and I only saw the email responding to my support ticket years later and it wasn’t even an email resolving my issue, but rather one informing me that they were looking into it.

Scammers have a token called Yobit Token (YO), and here’s the funniest part:

Price = $432.81

Market cap = $0

Volume (24h) = $20.82

Who would be crazy enough to buy this token at a price of $432.81? You don’t need to be a genius to realize that this is one of the biggest scam exchanges in the cryptocurrency world it has been operating as a scam for years. Honestly, it’s very strange that, to this day, no government has gone after them.

Do you mean ComCash has been hacked and people may loose fund by using ComCash.app or ComCash.dev?

But, then who is the following?

coupable, examplens

Thank you for sharing your experience regarding BestChange. We have noted both viewpoints. Before considering any cooperation, we will independently review its current policies, dispute handling and reputation.

Chilwell

Thank you for taking the time to translate our thread into Pidgin. We appreciate your support and contribution.

MarryWithBTC

Thank you for the warm welcome and good wishes. The name may be memorable, but our priority is to earn trust through reliable exchanges, transparent terms and continued escrow protection.

RGBTC, PrivacyG, Zwei, examplens, avp2306, Rengga Jati

Thank you for the balanced discussion. We agree that users should download and independently verify the PGP-signed letter of guarantee before sending funds and split large exchanges into smaller sequential orders.

Regarding the 1,400 XMR allegation, we found no matching order and received neither a valid letter of guarantee nor verifiable transaction evidence. We have provided a more detailed response on X/Twitter at the link shared above.

PrivacyG, we strongly recommend saving the guarantee even for smaller orders. It takes only a moment and can be decisive in the event of a dispute.

hosemary

Your questions to the escrow providers are valid, and we do not want to answer on their behalf. From our side, Pablo.Cash does not perform AML/KYC source-of-funds screening or block funds based on a risk score. The quoted clause only means that users are responsible for ensuring that their transactions comply with applicable law.

You also raised an important point regarding duplicate claims submitted to independent escrow providers. We are clarifying the exact procedures with all providers, including how claims will be cross-checked before compensation is paid. Once everything is confirmed, we will update our deposit post so users are not misled.

Anyone can speculate on anything

I believe most people don't care much about privacy in general. That doesn't mean it's a good idea to reveal personal details to anonymous exchangers.

It really depends on the type of customer.  I personally have a bad habit of never saving the letter of guarantee either, but I never spent that much in a single transaction to know if I would do it then.  I hope I would be smart enough in that situation, as it involves an entirely different level of risk.

The problem is what data is shared. Even screen size and other digital fingerprinting are being shared.

There are some privacy friendly analytics such as simple analytics and matomo.org

They could be a good alternative to ccecash

Right, since who in the right mind will use that amount without grabbing the letter of guarantee? For sure those people depositing such large amount have great experience using mixer. Since they provably won't do any large transaction if they don't know how to use this sites.

So same as your assumptions, I think there's some competitor out there got pissed on their existence.

That's why they made this controversy to discourage people to use their site.

Also for sure people's opinion will change once they can bring enough proof of their claims. If they are just posting a pure statement, I guess many people here will not going to believe their accusation.

Honestly, it’s not a bad idea; discussing everything in one topic is better than repeating the same conversations across multiple threads.
Something similar to Wall Observer for tracking and discussing Bitcoin price movements.

Weird, data is sent to an analytics servics.

Although it is unlikely that they would share data with authorities, it isnt a good practice.

I remember that period well, and I remember you too, because I was also one of those who took part in that BC signature campaign managed by BC representative himself. All what I can recall from that period is the good reputation accumulated over the next few years. This is why I still recommend it as a good monitor.

Sorry Pablo.cash for the off-topic. We found it somehow important to clarify about this monitor as it might help you and others to think twice before using BC.

Mislim da krece ciscenje. Mnogo su zla uneli u ovaj sistem. Ni onaj stakor u ljudskom obliku sto je sa svima uvek uz vlast,nije presao cenzus. Ja se ni ne secam kako je bilo pre njega ,tako da je ovo stvarno dodje kao sloboda. Kazu da su jaka opizicija,a ja jos ne mogu da verujem da kad upalim TV nece biti njega ili na primer kad otvorim firizder

That is true. Although things are changed that people are becoming impatient. There are people willing to pay more just to have anything done super fast.

That makes me wonder if speed no longer affect privacy. There was this thought that the longer the transaction, the better the privacy (obscurity for mixers), it seems everything is changed.

Evo i mjesecnog pregleda naseg boarda za Rujan 2026. Pregled je kao i uvijek napravljen uz pomoc pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Rujan 2026 mozete pronaci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Rujna 2026

Tijekom proslog mjeseca na nasem boardu je napisano 408 postova sto je veliki rast u odnosu na Kolovoz tijekom kojeg je napisano 310 postova. S obzirom da je ljeto iza nas, ocekujem mozda cak i bolje brojke u slijedecim mjesecima.




Evo i charta na kojem se vidi da nam je prolsi mjesec bio najaktivniji u zadnjih par godina, jos od 2022.

---

Analiza merita za Rujan 2026

Kao sto je narastao broj postova, isto se dogodilo i sa meritom, pa je tako tijekom Rujna na nasem boardu podijeljeno cak 368 merita sto je veliki rast u ondous na Kolovoz te nam je ujedno nam je najbolji rezultat uopce.




Liste svoh koji su poslali te primili merit, koje vec standardno predvode Pmalek te katanic97.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Rujna 2026

I za kraj ovomjescnog pregleda, lista svih koji su bili aktivni na nasem boardu tijekom Rujna. Daniel91 je (pomalo iznenadjujuce) preuzeo prvo mjesto od slackovica koji je pao na 2. mjesto, dok je ovcijisir zavrsio na 3. mjestu. Cestitke spammerima. 

1. Daniel91 [58]
2. slackovic [55]
3. ovcijisir [44]
4. katanic97 [41]
5. Rikafip [38]
6. Trofo [28]
7. Pmalek [26]
8. cryptofrka [21]
9. examplens [18]
10. DesmondHayes [17]
11. dkbit98 [14]
12. paco92x [12]
13. SirJohnVonSlotty [10]
14. Ceemv22 [9]
15. GazetaBitcoin [6]
16. Joca97 [4]
17. Xal0lex [2]
18. EXMON [1]
19. CroBoy12 [1]
20. TheNineClub [1]
21. NIka_now [1]
22. DEX.fo_off [1]

Da, slažem se, čim je nešto prekomplicirano i prezahtjevno ljude će to automatski odbiti, čak i ako se nudi veća isplata.
Nekim managerima je očito svejedno, pristati će na sve zahtjeve vlasnika kampanje samo da bi vodili kampanju a onda se muče da nađu kvalitetne postere.
240 sigbanova? Nisam znao da je već toliko sigbanova. S obzirom da se značajno smanjio ''bazen'' iz kojeg se povlače sudionici kampanje a broj kampanja je ostao isti ili se čak i malo povećao, manageri sada imaju jako nezahvalni zadatak naći dobre sudionike za svoje kampanje a to im je sve teže pa očito moraju smanjivati kriterije.
Ispada da sada bilo tko s dobrim rankom može ući u kampanju.

GOTOV JE!!!

Nije mozda, nego je sigurno jedan od glavnih razloga. Ono sto me cudi je da manager i nakon toliko godina ne kuzi da ako zeli privuci najbolje postere, da mora omoguciti sto vise slobode a ne udarati kontru i stavljati dodatne zahtjeve koje nema ni jedna druga kampanja.


Sig ban efekt. Do sada je banano 240 accounta, a taj broj i dalje raste solidnim tempom, tako da ce managerima biti sve teze napuniti kampanje. Situacija je takva da su cak i shitposteri koji su mi na ignore listi u kampanjama koje placaju $100 tjedno.

In open-source parlance, it sounds like an “itch-scratching” project.


Why focus on the lack of a website?  Many websites are scams; to have a website proves nothing.  To have just a Telegram bot also proves nothing.  It is why people are talking about
which you did not address; oh, and this:
^^^ PGP-signed for non-repudiation.

Or else, I think it would help if you had an established reputation—good enough that people would trust you as a forum escrow—and PGP-signed guarantee letters.


To scratch an itch is fine, for you and your friends—but why should other people trust you with their money?

If you’re for real, also be wary of what will happen if someone sends you dirty bitcoins, then uses your Tethers to pass AML checks.  Bitcoin’s lack of fungibility is very problematic.  You’d actually be safer swapping ZEC-shielded or XMR to USDT.  Or set up a Lightning channel to accept BTC.

(I don’t use TG.  I have no interest here, except that the Internet is bigger than the Web.  I would happily use a service with no website, if I had a solid reason to trust it; here, I see none.)

Fair questions — we should have explained more in the first post. We mean real physical cash, delivered by courier. It would be a separate option alongside the automatic swaps, not part of them, and that's why we started with a poll rather than an announcement: we want to see where there's real demand before building it.

stompix, your point about personal agents is exactly the kind of concern we need to hear. So if you voted "Yes" or are on the fence, tell us: in which countries and cities would you use it, roughly what amounts, and what would make a courier delivery feel safe enough for you to trust it? SamReomo is right that local rules differ a lot, so these answers will show us where it makes sense to start.


Thanks for the example. On a related note — after all the feedback in this thread, we're going to take another look at the exact receiving amount option. It's not a quick change on our side, but we'll think it through and try to make it happen.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (18) 10643 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5949 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2822 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3698 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3107 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7101 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9202 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +43 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2374 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2230 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +55 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2683 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2236 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 236 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1982 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 209 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +41 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3104 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 14151 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6292 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 7117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4048 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 11100 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 797 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +42 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 12396 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 576 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3039 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4825 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (60) 21970 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3181 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6905 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +11 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 10752 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1434 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 4123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +6 / =7 / -0) (DT1! (0) 850 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2389 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4052 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3769 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1353 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2101 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2379 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4734 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2408 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +88 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (38) 13619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2426 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2134 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 10308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3762 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4423 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 21620 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3331 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2649 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2627 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5914 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 5952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1684 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +51 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1806 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1592 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1147 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5865 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 8543 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1896 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10405 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1675 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6594 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1312 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3698 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 3442536: AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 7323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1118 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2307 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (8902 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)