Hello !

FixedFloat monthly volume around 500 Millions USD$. Do the math about all that complaints that you showed us, there is around 200k and all these complaints in last 5 years. It's around 0.0001% chance being "frozen" (if these complaints are even real). And FixedFloat has a "KYC: Minimal Risk" , not "KYC: None" .

If you not agree with our KYC policy, just skip our service. Thank you 😊
We did a really cool and helpful service.

Hello !

KYC: NONE
Minimal AML and data screening. KYC is never requested. High-risk transactions are refunded.

KYC: MINIMAL RISK
Standard AML and data screening. High-risk transactions are refunded. In very rare cases (e.g. the wallet address appears on FBI / Interpol lists as fraudulent or sanctioned) additional data may be requested.

KYC: RISK-TRIGGERED
Standard AML and data screening. On AML risk — the transaction may be frozen pending further document review.

We compare information from our providers and personal database. The rates depend on that. For additional information about our KYC rate policy, visit https://privataswap.com/#/legal/terms

Really, this pump has put some energy back into us, even if we knew there would be a recovery but every single time it feels like new haha. Time plays a vital role, because the last pump was in 2025. Since then we have been in a bear market and still it is early for us to think of a bull run again because BTC hit a new ATH in October and a few days after, the market dumped and we saw a black swan event.

It happened to me as well, the pages kept on loading once I tried to open the link in other tab, but it was fine when I was exchanging from start to end. But I still gave the link, as I thought maybe it was not opening in my browser (tor), but kycnot could verify somehow, because they confirmed the feedback.

Fair concern. Simplest fix on your end: take a screenshot of the order page right when the swap completes, before that short window closes. That screenshot serves as your proof for the raffle regardless of whether the live page or the KYCNOT review catches up in time.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15033 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 10465 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5722 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2810 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11368 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4790 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 10060 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6900 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +46 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2238 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2182 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 6277 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2184 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (11) 6804 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1951 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2389 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 13885 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6272 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6794 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6958 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3909 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10711 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4481 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3988 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 11472 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 12149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2934 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4707 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (62) 21505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3153 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6727 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3708 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1325 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4236 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2033 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2337 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15655 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3695 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (39) 13344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2387 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2110 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2659 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3684 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7684 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 21334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2616 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2610 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5826 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5802 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3795 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1910 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1652 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4179 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 859 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5753 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (28) 8251 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10166 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 10049 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6503 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    96. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1022 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8880 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

That's expected behavior, not a bug — we don't retain order data beyond a short window after completion. What does persist is the PGP-signed confirmation for that order, which is what actually proves the swap happened and its terms — that's the piece that matters for any dispute, not the live order page.

Always save your PGP confirmation at the time of the swap; the order ID page itself isn't meant to be a long-term record.

We'd love for you to take part.

It seems it’s been clearly added to the FAQ. Since they have an option, it must be working. I am not sure how their tracking links or order IDs work. But after entering your order page, you can add a refund address. I also have a question: if someone gets your order ID where you haven’t entered a refund address previously, then someone might add it and request refunds. Also, someone would try with a random order ID as well.

I believe the refund address must be added before proceeding with the swap. It’s better to avoid unnecessary hassle for both exchanges and users. When something goes wrong, then users have to talk with support, etc. Refund address should be mandatory, not optional anyway.

Appreciate all three of you catching this — genuinely useful pushback. The intent was never to add a mixing feature; the idea was to let users avoid the extra network fee/spread from routing USDT through BTC and back when all they actually need is the same asset on a different chain. That's a network-switch use case, not a mixing one — but we can see how the wording read otherwise.

To be clear: there's no mixer coming. We'll stick to what examplens suggested — framing this properly as USDT network conversion (ERC-20 ↔ TRC-20), not same-network round-tripping. Thanks for keeping us out of trouble on this one.

And what's the difference between showing % fee and clicking the “GET RATE” button to see how much you'll get?

Our fee isn’t fixed and depends on many factors, and since we DON’T use JavaScript, you’d have to click a button similar to the current “GET RATE” anyway to get the % fee we’re currently charging.

The fee changes every 10 seconds; if you enter 1 BTC > XMR and click “GET RATE" wait 10 seconds, and then click again, you’ll see a different amount in your output.

It's not just that
- the guy was a merit source so some still feel like they're indebted to him for ranking up
- they themselves didn't lose a thing so they have nothing to complain about
- sometimes in most boards, pride and nationalism take over, it's not the only board that has done so
And there is an extra thing
- as a board user when you see someone who has had at least 6 accounts there, the logic is that he might still have some others and he might grow 6 again and maybe pull some strings and become a merit source again, so, is it worth it for the average user to make a so-called enemy of this guy? nope!

Can't you just press "get rate" and see how much you will receive after the fees? There is definitely no need to generate an order.

Yep, some members don't want themselves to associate with gambling brands so they only prefer other signature campaigns or have priority when there is an open slot and the same way some might be an active bettor and regularly engage in sports related threads that force them to pick gambling campaigns.

And there is an important one, working with a certain manager might be comfortable for them.

I think it is safer to remain as an exchange to avoid scrutiny from the authorities as well.
You can offer a great private gain from swapping coins already

Forcing the user to make usdt > btc and then btc > usdt back already increases his privacy and makes your service stay as an exchange

I will release the local boards overview tomorrow (I've been traveling the whole month, hence the delay), but from what I can see, there has been a slight decrease in both the number of posts and the number of active users.

Having said that, it's naive to think that those who got banned haven't already started working on "leveling up" new accounts, seeing how easy it is to farm merit nowadays. So who knows, maybe it will even increase the activity in the long run. 

Thanks for sending this! We missed that!

Da, to je jedan dosta veliki nedostatak, zato sam i prestao dijeliti collectibles tombole ovdje u threadu (prije sam i znao podijeliti) a i sudjelovati u njima. Ali ako postoji interes i ako sudionici procijene rizik nije mi problem podijeliti i te tombole.

BTW. Mislim da znam o cemu je rijec, ali nisam znao da je to doslo do twittera. Ista osoba je dosla do moje mail adrese koju sam koristio na forumu i jos hrpu mjesta i svasta mi slao dok ga nisam blokirao. Takoder mislim da mi je slao i poruke na TG ali nemam dokaze.

To je dogadaj nakon kojeg sam "pocistio" tragove e mail adrese na internetu i prestao se prijavljivati na Collectibles nagradne igre. Ali ako se netko ne planira sukobljavati sa scammerima mozda im ne smeta da salju adresu ukoliko osvoje nagradu, pogotovo ako nagradnu igru vodi netko od povjerenja.

Well, as the examplens said, the moment you implement that, Theymos is going to ban you and delete all the topics here.
Plus, just from the pure business side, I don't see why you would try to expand that way, especially with USDT, which is somewhat of a hot coin now eyed by all the sactions, it's just adding a lot of trouble to be honest.

Not only B1exch but every other exchange should have something like that so users won't be able to send less than minimum even by mistake. I think B1exch has done a great job on their website and I think every other service should implement something similar so the users won't face any issue when it comes to minimum deposit.

Majority of users already read such minimum deposit thing and always set values fixed to minimum deposit needed for the swap or higher values so they won't face any issue but there are some users who make such mistakes but again a useful feature that gives such message is useful for every user.

He claims to be a 27 year old housewife 

I find that absolutely strange. If a scandal on such a scale were to happen in a local board, you would imagine that the members would post about to discuss the matter in detail. If what you discovered is true, it means in this particular case it seems as though the members are avoiding mentioning it. An account farm that included a merit source have left their board yet they have remained silent?

This is the part that seems strange. If they are posting in order to meet their signature campaign quota rather than discuss the scandal in their board then there is something seriously wrong in that board.

I mean first and third prizes. They are more than likely operated by the same account farmer rather than be part of two different account farms. Also, the similarities in the pizza contest entries were more than incredible, well more than enough to be a coincidence 

As far as i've seen, there are quite a lot of active members in the Pakistani section of the forum. They are active even without that account farm, but i agree that it would be very embarrassing. We'll see the statistics in a few days, the end of the month is coming soon

They do already.  If I enter an amount less Monero than minimum, it says 'Please select a value that is no less than 0.25.'  I do not use Java Script so I suppose it works the same way for the rest of the people who do.

I am buying for profit, it's doubtful that 10-20k can be earned back in a short time plus risk of losing the account

I know these are the minimum account requirements to join the revenue share program. But forget about buying such an account for $70. As I wrote earlier, even an account boosted by bots to achieve these numbers will cost three times more, and the risk of Twitter's algorithms detecting bots is very high.

I saw interactive accounts with 10k–20k followers for sale. Female accounts. So if you are interested let me know.

Those are the requirements to join revenue share program, that's the purpose of purchase.

,@twitter was purchased and operates at a loss since then to but getting @elonmusks ,@tesla money should be worth the grinding

You don't understand what you're talking about!
To get 5 million views in a few months, you need at least tens of thousands of followers and top-tier content. The numbers you provided - 500 followers and 5 million impressions - have nothing in common and make absolutely no sense together. Unless these impressions are filled with bots.
For $70, you could buy a basic account with 500 followers, depending on its age. However, if you want an account with 5 million impressions, you will either need to look for significantly lower stats or pay much, much more. Even an account farmed with bots to 5 million impressions in 3 months will be two or three times more expensive.

It said within 3 month the 5 million impressions, it gives nothing unless it's approved for revenue share. When it is than perhaps it does give more than 70$ but work has to be maintained after

Thanks everyone for your patience. Following users received $90 to their bitcoin account:
Congratulations! You are our reviewers.

Review deadline 31st August

Review deadline 7th September

Review dealine 15th September

1. Please follow that you must make a successful exchange
2. Please share your experience, suggestion, feeling with screenshot where it is necessary
3. Please make the review useful for the management in this topic.
4. Save the successful order ID and screenshots of the steps you went though. You need to give these information in the verification field when you are submitting your feeedback on WeLive Crypto Zeto listing.
5. Do not miss your deadline

Cheers,

Note: WeLive Crypto are working on improving their feedback system and they informed me that any review that is positive and negative - without a valid verification information, they will remove it soon. So do not post a Positive or Negative review without proper verification information. This does not applicable to neutral review.

The question now remains, how will the victims prove that their bitcoin was stolen?
Since there is no kyc to be able to identify owners?

It's not just the design, but also the hosting. I tried visiting the domain and got hosting-related errors.

---

The most difficult thing is the news selection algorithm. 90% of cryptocurrency-related sites recycle the same content (which might be rumors), so unless your algorithm is good enough, your site will be worthless.

But this is practically inevitable.
Whatever rules or norms are created, there will always be someone trying to overcome.

So our concern is not the scheme that will emerge, but rather creating something that minimizes what we know can happen.

Now that they already traced the hacker, its good to see what other action they made. Because many people are so curious about this case, they want those people involve in this hacking issue to get captured.

Maybe this is also the reason why the funds stolen has left unmoved? https://crypto.news/coldcard-hackers-leave-87-of-stolen-bitcoin-unmoved-after-114m-theft they are maybe afraid to do transaction because it can create fresh traces to the authorities.

They should act fast, so they can still recover the funds and return it back to those proven victims.

I don’t think it would be better to meet them in person. Also, it wouldn’t be ChangeNOW directly just someone from their Business Development team. He will most likely tell you to contact the support or compliance team, and he probably isn’t authorized to handle frozen aml kyc matters. Their plan is just to be to advertise more and scam more users.

I’m sorry for the OP. He even created a thread in Currency Exchange. I wanted to help him about his exchange, but they said he found someone. I hope he won’t get scammed again and that everything goes smoothly on his side.

Best regards,
— Tręvoid

Hvala, budem probao. Ma stvar je u tome da sam si u Claude različite poslove podijelio u više projekata pa mi to dobro dođe. Moram vidjeti postoji li mogućnost prebacivanja razgovora između različitih AI usluga.


Ja sam neko vrijeme koristio besplatni ChatGPT. To je bilo sranje i onda sam počeo plaćati pretplatu. To je bilo negdje prije godinu dana. Ne znam kako je sad, ali nakon što sam s ChatGPT prešao na Claude, preporodio sam se. Baš mi je puno bolji. Na poslu imam i plaćeni Gemini ali njega koristim samo za neke osnovne stvari tipa prijevod dužeg teksta na engleski. Probao sam ga koristiti za posao, ali uopće mi nije dobar.

Što se tiče pretplate, donosi ti puno toga. Osim toga što imaš puno veći limit za upite, Claude omogućava da dijeliš razgovore u različite projekte gdje onda za svaki projekt možeš napisati upute posebne za taj projekt. Dodatno, svaki projekt ima svoju memoriju koju AI puni prema razgovoru u tom projektu.

Naravno da AI ne možeš koristiti bez razmišljanja, odnosno na način "pitat ću ga i napraviti kako kaže". Meni je uštedio jako puno vremena, ali ipak kod odgovora treba malo "mućnuti glavom" jer nekad baš zna zabrljati i otići u krivom smjeru. Mislim da se to puno više osjeti kod free verzija.

There is no fake SageSwap website, but there is a website that instructs users to connect their wallet. This also depends on the scam and which group is behind it, because from what we can see, several people or groups are involved.

PHISHING URL: https://dappsolutionfix.com/ (DO NOT CLICK, OR CONNECT YOUR WALLET)


We'll definitely do something about it in the near future, maybe add some warnings, but we're still thinking it over, and right now we have a lot of work to do because we're working on something cool.

The longest campaign i participate in reddit required posts in an specific subreddit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4236484.msg38445950#msg38445950
BITCORE BTX Reddit Campaign - Full Members+ - Earn $20/Week 

Their Reddit became quite active for some time, and we had no problems of accounts suspended.

Doing in a way that government won't have complete track is getting difficult, people used Noones for p2p trading but it is shutting down and there is group which uses automated escrows but prices will be higher such as 10% more than the market price while buying which is due to the effect of high taxes and people take other routes.

But most of the Indians use traditional exchanges so they may not take KYC less methods such as Bisq or other such platforms.

Thank you. I understand your point, and I have seriously considered simply accepting the 12,712.84 USDT and moving on.

But before doing that, I decided to try a different approach, and I would genuinely like your opinion on whether you think it is worth continuing.

Since normal support has not produced a resolution that I can independently verify, I have been documenting the dispute publicly.

I created a dedicated website where I am organizing the chronology, compensation figures, communications and technical evidence from the case. I am trying to make it possible for anyone interested to examine what happened rather than simply relying on my accusations.

I have also been discussing the case publicly on X.

One particularly important part of the public record is that I contacted Bitget CEO Gracy Chen directly on X, and on August 18 she publicly replied to me:

“Got it, will resolve the problem for you.”

I preserved that public reply.

Unfortunately, despite that statement and the subsequent escalation, I still do not have what I consider a technically verifiable resolution of the dispute.

Because of this, I have started using X to document the progression of the case and to show the difference between what was publicly promised and what subsequently happened.

I have posted screenshots, updates and explanations under Bitget-related discussions so that other users can see that this dispute exists and examine the evidence themselves.

I am also producing visual material and AI-assisted videos explaining the timeline in a simpler format. The intention is not to fabricate evidence — the underlying screenshots, API records and communications remain the actual evidence. The videos are only a way of presenting the documented chronology to a wider audience.

At the same time, I created a website dedicated to the case where the amounts, chronology and supporting material can be organized in one place rather than scattered across social media.

I am also considering contacting cryptocurrency journalists, financial journalists, YouTube channels and potentially television/news organizations to see whether anyone is interested in independently examining the case.

My approach would be to provide them with the documentation and let them reach their own conclusions.

I am deliberately trying to distinguish between:

what I can prove,

what I calculated,

what Bitget has stated,

and what remains unanswered.

I also continue commenting publicly on Bitget's X posts about my unresolved case. However, I am beginning to question whether posting repeatedly under many of their posts is actually helping.

Perhaps a smaller number of well-documented posts, combined with the website, this Bitcointalk thread and contact with journalists, would be more credible and effective than continuously posting comments.

That is actually something I would appreciate your opinion about.

Do you think continuing this public documentation campaign makes sense?

Or, given that Bitget has already declared the 12,712.84 USDT compensation “final,” do you think I am simply wasting more time and should accept it and move on?

I am reluctant to abandon the case because this involves a significant amount of money for me, and I now have a considerable amount of technical documentation preserved.

At the same time, I don't want this to become an emotional campaign that damages the credibility of the technical case.

My objective is to make the evidence visible enough that Bitget either provides a reproducible explanation of the compensation calculation or that independent people can examine the dispute and reach their own conclusions.

I appreciate your candid opinion, even if your advice is that I should stop.

From what I understand, that $12,712.84 is compensation and it was a final decision made by Bitget. So, if it's a final decision, the OP can only appeal to the courts, because I highly doubt that Bitget will reverse this decision. That's why I said they already have many scam accusations against them. It will also be much more expensive to hire a lawyer in Singapore, and it's possible that with the CEO's influence, the OP won't even be able to report them in Singapore. My advice to the OP is to accept the $12,712.84 and move on with their life, use another exchange instead of chasing explanations they won't receive because Bitget made a final decision.

Thanks. This is a fair criticism, and I agree that I need to make this clearer.

12,712.84 USDT is not a number calculated or requested by me. It is the compensation amount determined by Bitget.

The money affected was mine, across the accounts involved in the TUTUSDT/BICOUSDT incident that I am reconstructing from Bitget API records.

The reason I dispute the 12,712.84 USDT figure is that I have not been able to reproduce how Bitget arrived at it.

From the API-derived records, I identified SYS-classified activity. Aggregating the realized PnL associated with those records currently gives:

MAIN: -30,107.61857092 USDT
SUB: -12,838.32027004 USDT
ELITE: -1,994.72 USDT
LINKED_KEY2: -1,082.30625 USDT

However, I want to emphasize something important:

I am NOT claiming that the sum of those SYS realized-PnL figures is automatically the amount Bitget owes me.

That is precisely what I am trying to determine.

To calculate a defensible compensation amount, I believe we need to distinguish normal trading losses from losses attributable to the incident, understand what the SYS records represent, reconstruct the affected cross-margin positions, account for any relevant BICO/TUT interactions, and then subtract any amount already compensated.

So if you ask me today, “How much should Bitget have compensated you?”, my answer is:

I do not want to invent a number before the reconstruction is complete.

What I can say is that Bitget determined 12,712.84 USDT, called that determination “final,” and I currently cannot reproduce that figure from the records available to me.

If their number is correct, I want to understand the calculation that produces exactly 12,712.84 USDT.

If my reconstruction is wrong, I want someone here to identify where it fails.

My next post will therefore contain the actual redacted SYS event table, including timestamps, account, symbol, side, size, price, realized PnL and relevant API fields.

That should give everyone something concrete to audit rather than relying on my interpretation.

I appreciate you challenging this point because this is exactly the kind of scrutiny I came here for.

Yes there is 30% income tax with no offset on losses as well as 1% TDS every time we purchase or sell crypto. The laws are vague at best and some traders do follow all guidelines but most dont as for regular transaction it can be very messy and costly to keep track as well as file everything

I believe there are, but like said [and I got this explanation from Bitcoin Smith, so, he, as a native Indian can probably explain your curiosity better], crypto transactions are cut by heavy tax, 30% if google is reliable.

And yes, though I agree with you that the tax is still cheaper than having the risk of getting the entire amount taken away, I guess some Indians still prefer to "gamble" with this matter.

I've, in fact, actually tried to redirect those who had cases with INR fiat to try P2P in our marketplace's section. I guess some listened to this as the amount of complainants of BC stuck fiat transactions revolves around same people and some never returned with same case.

Gambling is legal in India but they banned online gambling, and states have their own policies when it comes to offline casinos which allows them to have some which is completely legal to operate.

Indian exchanges took weird method to discourage the use of cryptos, they tried banning it but court removed that ban so they are forcing the exchange to not let the users to withdraw their cryptos to their own address means they can buy any crypto in FIU regulated exchange but they can't withdraw to our wallet, we can only sell them later.

That includes Coinbase as well but Binance lets users to withdraw crypto after entering details about the receiving address and the user behind it.

And then there is 1% flat fee applied called TDS for every conversion followed by 30% gains that is why people avoid cryptos and uses INR.

Indian Govt. imposes heavy tax on crypto transactions [consider it as their way to prevent crypto domination and people to keep on using FIAT, just like CBDC and other govt. intervention], so it is very pricey for those who want to buy and deposit crypto to casinos, and much easier and cheaper alternatives to use these "merchants" to directly deposit fiat to casinos.

India make gambling illegal is a separate issue of why people use fiat, if I may rely on my logic, because if any, it will encourage Indian to heavily rely on crypto, due to its pseudoanonimity. Less chance of detection and bank-account freezing. But I guess what seemed illegal by countries' law in some ME and SEA are just semi-illegal.

Means, you can still play, govt. won't actively seek and monitor any gambling activities, and only block access to gambling sites that can easily bypassed by VPN. And this "leniency", brings us to a situation why gambling addicts from countries who prohibit gambling [not just India] to still gamble.

@logfiles Thanks for pointing that out. The old thread was for the previous version of KYCLESS before the redesign, and it is already locked.

@examplens I agree that KYCLESS is not trying to reinvent directories. There are already several good projects in this space, and users will naturally choose what they prefer. We are simply developing ours step by step. The rate monitor is still there and working.

Regarding listed services, if something in our ANN violates forum rules, it can be reported and moderators can review it. The directory itself is independent and available to everyone.

@hugeblack Maybe I know the forum well, maybe not I don't think that really changes anything about the service itself.

As for missing services, anyone can submit a project and we will review it. The directory will continue to grow.

@avp2306 I think the BitList comparison is a bit unfair. KYCnot.me, BitList and many other directories naturally share similar layouts and concepts. That does not mean one copied another.

Yes, I like BitList's design and I think they are doing a good job. Some visual similarities are obvious, but a dark theme, tables, filters and service cards are fairly standard for this type of project.

We are simply building KYCLESS in our own way and improving it over time.

Phantom i ja imam već dugo, još iz vremena kad je bio wallet samo za Solanu. Ali moram priznati da ga nisam koristio već poprilično dugo. Što se tiče upozorenja, to isto ima i MetaMask. Dogodilo mi se nekoliko puta da mi MM javi upozorenje iako znam da je website čist. Ne znam koliko dugo im treba da nešto maknu s black liste.

Truly understand what you are saying here, but many people truly expect that he became pro on Bitcoin. After he discuss and drop lots of promises during campaign period.

But unfortunately, he's actions actually seems like didn't show any genuine support for Bitcoin. Most of his actions and past statements seems like for short term only on which his circle is the one gaining the benefits.

So maybe its good to threat him not fully interested with the principle of Bitcoin. He only work with it because he knows he can benefit on both financially and also on political side.

Thanks. That's a fair point. I realize that my original post focused too much on the final compensation discussion without first explaining the underlying incident.

The compensation relates to futures trading activity on my Bitget account involving TUTUSDT/BICOUSDT under cross margin.

I have preserved the relevant API/trading records, orders, fills, screenshots and communications with Bitget. My goal is to reconstruct what actually happened from those records and allow experienced members here to examine the evidence independently.

I will provide the backstory chronologically: the positions before the incident, what happened, the relevant orders and fills, the cross-margin impact, what Bitget considered affected activity, and how the compensation process eventually resulted in the 12,712.84 USDT figure.

I am not asking anyone to assume my interpretation is correct. If my reconstruction or calculations are wrong, I want that identified as well.

So I agree with your criticism. Before asking whether the compensation amount is correct, I need to show exactly what happened and what the compensation was intended to cover. I will provide that evidence and chronology next.

With how Donald J. Trump talked about bitcoin during the presidential campaign of the United States of America I was thinking if he wins Biden he will support bitcoin and implement policies that will increase more mass adoption for bitcoin which will see bitcoin hit new all the time high, that will make people talk about bitcoin but after I have seen several tweets made by Trump just to manipulate the market for his own gain and his family has made me totally agree with you that Trump has no special interest in bitcoin.