What was the essence of returning the $10;
Any clue from anyone?

So, it is normal to just suspect every new project until it is proven otherwise.
Could it be that they didn't actually want much scrutiny, the reason why they could easily give up on this forum?

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan Juni 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 103 user (berkurang 2 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS stompix hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 BitcoinPenny yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 BitcoinGirl.Club holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Vispilio hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 1miau Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder memehunter

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS hybridsole stompix hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner Real-Duke klarki LoyceV The Sceptical Chymist TryNinja BitcoinGirl.Club holydarkness Lafu tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 hosemary krogothmanhattan JollyGood igebotz hugeblack El duderino_ KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 Husna QA fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist n0nce YodasRedRocket God Of Thunder

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana Husna QA YOSHIE

Sumber: DT update log Juni 2026

This month 103 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

@MarryWithBTC
Thank you for the continued patience and constructive feedback! Yes, we will absolutely update here once the reserve display and BTC/USD reference value issues are fixed. The dev team is on it. Looking forward to earning that remaining 1.5 points. 🙂

@AHOYBRAUSE
Thank you for testing! Glad to hear the swap went smoothly.

Regarding upcoming coins — Native ETH, USDC (ERC-20), Solana and BSC/BNB are all on our roadmap. **USDT on BEP-20 is confirmed to be added** — we agree the lower BSC network fees will benefit users especially on smaller amounts. We will announce here as soon as each goes live.

On fees — exactly. Our goal is to keep them honest and competitive. $11 on a $1,000 swap reflects platform + network costs combined, and we work to keep that ratio fair.

@Daniel91 @examplens
Thank you both for sharing the context on kycnot.me. The wait is understandable — we respect that they manually verify every service personally, which is exactly why their listing carries weight in the privacy community. We are patient and will wait our turn just like everyone else.

@FP91G
Spot on observation! You are correct — the larger the swap, the lower the effective fee percentage, because the fixed network cost becomes a smaller share of the total. Thank you for documenting this so clearly with real numbers — this kind of data helps the whole community understand how the pricing actually works.

---

📢 **Update for everyone**

⚡ **Fast mode (1.5%) is back online!**

Fine-tuning is complete. Both modes are now fully available:
— ⚡ Fast — 1.5% · instant after network confirmation
— 🔗 Chain — 0.8% · up to 60 min · lower fee

Thank you for your patience! 🙏

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Yeah, and sometimes it can be hard to process how a service can go from 'very good' to a scam in a short time.
It is bad enough that their customers are unable to withdraw the funds they have stuck in the site, but to allow deposits from newly registered accounts just shows it is a brazen scam at this point and they are trying to take as much money as they can before they disappear.

OK thank you for this information.
I also shared my review of Dex.fo on kycnot a week ago, but I still see the same message: ''Listed, but not yet reviewed by the team.'' and ''No review checks have been published yet''.
I didn't know that their review check takes so long.
My account verification on kycnot took much less time, only 1 day and after that my kycnot account was linked to my btc account and verified so I thought my review of Dex would be resolved by now.

They said that over 6 months ago. However, what happens now is that if you try to withdraw you won't be able to get your money whereas if you try to deposit you will be able to.

They seem to have different minimum deposit for different pairs. I observed this when they first listed in this forum. Things must have changed, but let's wait and see what they'll say about it.

Thank you, this means a lot. The community feedback here
has been genuinely valuable — it pushed us to be more
transparent than we initially were.

Still a lot of work ahead, but we're building for the
long term.

I have noticed their sincere efforts in following the community recommendation. I applaud IronySwapy for being professional and swiftly following the community recommendations without resistance. That is a sign that a project is willing to grow and building for a long time.

This is how to build trust, unlike one exchange I saw that is not ready to lock $50k in escrow. Depositing security fund does not mean instance acceptance by the community, but following recommendations smoothen relation.

I also appreciate those who pointed out the liquidity risk, especially examplens for following up till result was gotten.

@joniboini

Yes, the currently displayed reserve values are reasonably close to the actual reserves — the difference is not 90% off, just minor fluctuations from the refresh bug. Once we fix it, the display will reflect the real reserve status accurately and stably. Thank you for asking the clarifying question.

@logfiles
Thank you for letting us know. Regarding **DAI — it has been removed from our supported pairs and will not be returning.** This is why you saw the loading issues and changing limits. We are focusing on assets with higher liquidity and demand. New coins are coming soon — just need a little patience. 🙏

Regarding kycnot.me listing — we are aware and we are waiting in the queue like everyone else. As examplens and hugeblack mentioned, the team there reviews each service manually and they are a small team. We respect their process and will wait our turn.

@aoluain @crwth
Thank you for reporting the LTC issue. We just checked and **LTC is working normally on our side.** Could you try again? If you still see EXCHANGE UNAVAILABLE — please let us know which pair exactly (LTC to what?), the approximate amount, and ideally a screenshot. We will investigate immediately.

@hugeblack @examplens
Thank you both for the context on kycnot.me listings. Patience is exactly the right approach. We are building for the long term and a few weeks of waiting will not change our plans.

Yes they dont offer big Fee but its good starting point for me atleast until i get my own liquidity provider just need to get some funds up

Edge as in the open source wallet? am I missing something here, how come they are responsible for most of the volume and transactions from this list?


Chain Analyasis companies are going to have a great time with this one.

That jump is not random, because this is how those regulators flag those coins especially if they made a transaction on those sanctioned wallets.

If the platform got blacklisted just like what happen to HTX, any coin interact with them will also get a high risk ratings, but this one does not mean at all that all coins who made transaction with them is a scam. But its really unfortunate that those regulators what to shortcut everything then generalize for the sake of compliance matters. The problem here is the clean project has been included and been punish by those regulators by giving high risk ratings.

That promise that they would return the funds one day, isn't something to trust on, as they have been scamming people for over a year now and even now they have deposits enabled and withdrawals disabled. This action alone shows that they still want to scam as many people as they can.

Since this domain is so old and it has a trusted name for so many years, someone finding them through Google or social media may still be tempted to deposit there as they don't know the current situation of FreeBitco. 

That's true. If a service only resells another it's value to our users, and its rates, won't be particularly good.

---

Our SimpleX group is an increasingly popular venue for people to argue with each other
Join here: link, and argue with frens

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (56) 14471 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 9781 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 30747: Vod (Trust: +30 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2663 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 5180 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1761 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2788 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 10918 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2800 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3469 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2682 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (4) 9712 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8755 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1985 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2021 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6222 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2494 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 1894 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2341 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2974 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 13460 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6203 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6737 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +35 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (21) 6801 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3659 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 9952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 733 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: #  +51 / =3 / -5) (DT1! (0) 1338 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +37 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4360 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3739 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 369212: zazarb (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4524 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2748 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4524 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (59) 20869 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 6329 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4057 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 451 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1873 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1490 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3757 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3490 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 6738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +97 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 4192 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1954 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 5134 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4556 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 15530 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2246 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3436 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +82 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (34) 12548 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1418 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2279 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2051 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9797 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2581 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4129 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3391 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 20635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2476 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2577 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 5640 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 5682 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +7 / =9 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7613 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +45 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3643 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 1894 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1404 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4049 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 837 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1558 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1144 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5596 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 7971 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1871 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1583 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5289 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1250 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3425 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3629575: memehunter (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1115 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (8652 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 11275: wariner (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 12089: piotr_n (Trust:  neutral) (461 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

I tried generating transaction graph yesterday and it worked perfectly fine for me with the entire exercise completed in about 5 minutes. It is possible that the wallet you used has so many transactions because I noticed that the higher the number the transaction of the wallet, the longer it takes to generate a transaction graph. Maybe you can try a wallet with few transactions to confirm my observation. I tried another wallet of over 47 transactions but the JS graph returned an error below

Q: Why is it not possible to choose a BTC to ERC20 (ETH, USDT, USDC) pair, while, for example, it is possible to swap XMR to ERC20 tokens?
A: It is, the site won’t let you swap amounts that are bigger than our current liquidity. All assets we support are swappable between each other (afaik, if there are bugs with some assets, please let us know).

Q: Does the system recognize online transactions before the first confirmation […]
A: Yes, a swap “locks” instantly when the transaction is detected in the blockchain. Since this might be the next question, the rate is updated a few times during TX confirmation and once instantly before payout.

Sure, we’ll add a letter of guarantee as well.

Evo i mjesecnog pregleda stanja domaceg boarda za Travanj 2026, koji je napravljen uz pomoc DdmrDdmr Bitcointalk Merit Dashboarda te BitList.

Chartove sa usporedbama svih lokalnih boardova za Travanj 2026 mozete naci na Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity threadu.

---

Analiza broja postova tijekom Travnja 2026

Tijekom Travnja na nasem boardu je napisano 265 postova sto je lagani rast u odnosu na ozujskih 248 postova a ovako odokativnom metodom rekao bih da ce pregled za Svibanj biti jos bolji jer smo osjetno aktivniji.

---

Analiza merita za Travanj 2026

Unatoc laganom porastu broja postova, broj podijeljenih merita je pao sa 251 u Ozujku na 198 u Travnju. Unatoc padu, to su i dalje odlicne brojke koje smo do prije koju godinu mogli samo sanjati.




Kad je u pitanju lista onih koji su podijelili te primili merit, nema iznenadjenja: na vrhu liste su naravno Pmalek te katanic97.

---

Lista aktivnih clanova tijekom Travnja 2026

Na kraju pregleda, lista svih koji su bili ktivni na nasem boardu tijekom proslog mjeseca. Na vrhu je naravno slackovic, ali mu se opasno priblizio Danijel91 te bi vrlo lako mogao izgubiti titulu ako se malo ne razbudi, dok je katanic97 zavrsio na za njega niskom 3. mjestu.

1. slackovic [42]
2. Daniel91 [37]
3. katanic97 [33]
4. ovcijisir [27]
5. Pmalek [23]
6. Trofo [22]
7. Rikafip [22]
8. examplens [18]
9. cryptofrka [18]
10. dkbit98 [8]
11. SirJohnVonSlotty [5]
12. paco92x [3]
13. Joca97 [1]
14. EXMON [1]
15. laurenB7742 [1]
16. CroBoy12 [1]
17. BitGoba [1]
18. ETZ-Swap [1]
19. morenojess71 [1]

We understand the skepticism and respect your right
to that opinion.

We are not affiliated with GhostSwap beyond using their
API — same as many developers who build on third-party
APIs without being part of that company.

We have not scammed anyone. Every transaction either
completes or funds are returned. If that ever changes,
we will shut the service down rather than harm users.

Time will show our intentions better than words can.
Thank you for pointing this out with the actual source —
this is exactly the kind of feedback we needed.

You are correct. GhostSwap's own Terms allow KYC in
certain cases, which contradicts what we have been
telling users. We should not have stated "no KYC ever"
if our LP reserves that right.

We are removing "no-KYC" claims from our platform until
we switch to a provider whose Terms genuinely guarantee
no KYC.

We apologize for the misleading information. We are
actively looking for an alternative LP and will announce
it in this thread as soon as we have a solution.

You make valid points and I appreciate the direct feedback.

You're right that "standard practice" was the wrong phrase —
trust has to be earned, not assumed.

Our liquidity provider is GhostSwap. We use their API
to execute swaps. We chose them because they don't require
KYC from users at any stage.

We understand the concerns around them. If our provider
ever changes terms, we will announce it publicly in this
thread before it affects any users.

Yes, this is our first project on Bitcointalk. Still learning.You're right, and I won't insult your intelligence further.

Yes, we use GhostSwap's API as our liquidity provider.
The logos came from their CDN because that's what their
API returns. We should have been upfront about this
from the start instead of being evasive.

This is our first project and we chose GhostSwap without
fully researching their reputation in this community.
That was a mistake on our part.

We are now actively looking at alternative providers.
We'll announce any changes publicly in this thread.You make a fair point. In our case, we initially hid it
out of inexperience rather than bad intent — we've since
confirmed that we use GhostSwap's API.

Lesson learned: transparency builds more trust than
trying to appear independent. We'll be more upfront
going forward.

Hey, I am working towards it, this is just an MVP. I am hiring content writers and experts who would like to work with me on this. Thank you so much for reviewing it and your feedback

A very thoughtful question you have asked.

I seem not to understand why some exchanges hide their LP. If an exchange is promising us privacy, they should be sincere enough to tell us their LP if they don't have their own liquidity. Is the reason for hiding it related to competitors not knowing?

Mixers partnering jambler are always proud of mentioning them, but in exchanges, it's totally different for some.

The widget design is based on an open-source template,
not copied from any specific exchange i think alot of sites use same design.

Regarding the logos — we initially used the first available
CDN source we found for coin icons. We've since moved them
to our own proxy. Your browser now only connects to ironswaps.org.

Like most swap interfaces, we aggregate liquidity from
multiple sources. We don't publicly disclose our providers
as this is commercially sensitive — same as any business.

If you have any issue with a swap, contact us on Telegram
and we'll assist directly
We don't publicly disclose our liquidity providers for
commercial reasons — this is standard practice.

You're right that if a provider ever requested KYC,
users would face a difficult choice. This is why our
ToS explicitly states the only outcomes are completion
or refund — no KYC request at any stage. If that ever
changed, we would switch providers immediately.

No swap service using third-party liquidity can give
a 100% guarantee forever — but we commit to transparency
if anything changes.

So, you mean that it's an advantage to have the same IP when you want to appear as the same person every time? This can be beneficial when you visit casinos and exchanges and there is a solution for that. You don't need an IP that has been used by multiple users before, this can flag you on some services. In this case, it's best to buy a dedicated IP from a VPN provider that offers this service but the disadvantage of this is that your anonymity isn't high and the IP is associated with you (but it's still through VPN and your ISP doesn't see it).

If you choose the same server and country, you are most likely doing enough. For my personal connection, my IP changes all the time because of NAT and limited IP addresses for my internet provider. But the IP is close enough and from the same region so this is enough for exchanges to not sound alarms as a unknown and suspicious login attempt.

As of now, Mullvad applied the new mitigation for servers:

@SpongeS
Thank you for the kind words! Yes — more coins and blockchain networks are coming. On our roadmap: native ETH, USDC (ERC-20), Solana, BSC/BNB and more. We will announce each addition here as they go live. Stay tuned!
@examplens
Great questions! Here is our current roadmap with expected timelines:
Coming soon:
— Native ETH — in development, launching shortly
— USDC (ERC-20) — in development
— Solana — planned Q3 2026
— BSC/BNB — planned Q3 2026
— Fast mode (1.5%) — temporarily offline for fine-tuning, launching very soon
The main bottleneck for expanding pairs is liquidity — we want to ensure stable reserves for each new direction before going live. We do not want to list a pair and then have it fail during an exchange. Technical integration also takes time to test properly. We prefer to launch fewer pairs that work flawlessly rather than many that are unstable.
@dwyane36
Great question about API key generation. We agree that self-service key generation directly on the website is the better approach — no emails, no waiting, instant access. That is exactly the direction we are planning to go. Users will be able to generate and manage their API keys independently through a dedicated section on the site. More details will be shared when the API documentation is ready.
@mikel_012
Thank you for the kind words! You are right — instant quote without requiring a wallet address first is something we designed intentionally. No friction, no commitment just to see a rate. We look forward to your first swap this week. Let us know how it goes! 🙂
DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Thank you for the additional context
on AMLBot and eXch — very useful
for understanding how these ratings
can be misleading.

And noted on Swapuz support explicitly
mentioning KYC — that confirms the
rating should reflect conditional
status more clearly.

Will update the interface accordingly.

null_route

Its time for yet another brief monthly overview of local boards activity, this time for October 2025. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and BitList

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet.

---

Post activity per local board during April 2026

During April, 13283 posts were written across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, which is a slight decrease compared to March (13524). Nigerian remained the most active board, followed by Russian and Turkish and all the other far behind,  while the bottom few remained the same like in the previous months.

---

Active members per local board during April 2026

During the last month, 1276 members wrote at least 1 post in one of the local boards, which is an expected decrease compared to March, during which 1305 members were active. Once again Nigerian remained the most active one, but this by not so big difference compared to Russian, while all other local boards are far behind.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during April 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during October, leader is Polish board that had 57% of such members, while Pakistan had only 11%, lowest among all local boards.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is once again Romanian board with 71%, while Croatian local board had only 16% of such members.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Turkish board with 48%, while at the bottom is Polish that had no members who wrote 10+ posts during last month.

---

Merit shared per local board during April 2026

Last month, 7462 merit was shared across local boards, which is an increase compared to March (7089 merit). This increase is shared among the few boards, while the most merited one (Nigerian) had a small decrease compared to the March.

More observant members might notice that French local board is missing from this chart, and that's because they didn't send a single merit in their local board during April. I don't know what's going on there, but its definitely not good.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during April 2026

The average merit per post ratio across local boards during April was 0.56, which is am increase compared to March (0.52 merit per post) and was epxcted due drop in the amount of posts written and increase of merit shared.

Spanish board is back at the top, followed closely by Romanian while Italian and Croatian close the group of those with more than 1 merit per post. At the same time, Greek board is down at only 0.05 merit per post, but its good to see that Pilipinas numbers are slowly improving.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during April 2026

In April, 530 members sent while 601 received merit in one of the local boards, and is an increase compared to month before (517 senders, 602 receivers).

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during April 2026

Once again Romanian board is at the top, and once again with 60% of merited posts, but Italian is also not that far away with 49% which is even more impressive considering how much more active they are than Romanian board.

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during April 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habit of local boards.

---

The most active members per local board during April 2026

The last but not the least, the list of the most active local board members. joker_josue from Portuguese board was once again the most active one with 134 posts (1 less than month before), while 2 members of Russian local board, safar1980 (128 posts) and klarki (127 posts) are right behind him. GG guys, keep it up!

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. safar1980 [128]	|	1. Lakai01 [77]	|	1. mandown [122]	|	1. Ale88 [47]	|	1. joker_josue [134]	|	1. famososMuertos [44]	|
2. klarki [127]	|	2. mole0815 [76]	|	2. yenerbatmaz [85]	|	2. fillippone [44]	|	2. sabotag3x [79]	|	2. Porfirii [40]	|
3. jokers10 [125]	|	3. Soonandwaite [69]	|	3. kriminall [58]	|	3. babo [43]	|	3. TryNinja [50]	|	3. Hispo [25]	|
4. Numeral [108]	|	4. MaxMueller [58]	|	4. Yabani [58]	|	4. Italian Panic [40]	|	4. alegotardo [44]	|	4. Artemis3 [24]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [96]	|	5. cygan [51]	|	5. kizilhare [55]	|	5. Niekko [37]	|	5. criptoevangelista [42]	|	5. Don Pedro Dinero [21]	|
6. zasad@ [85]	|	6. Koal-84 [49]	|	6. Phoenix Anka [53]	|	6. Plutosky [30]	|	6. bitmover [39]	|	6. danadc [18]	|
7. hostm [77]	|	7. Real-Duke [46]	|	7. Hvdv [53]	|	7. Cassius55 [21]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [36]	|	7. darxiaomi [14]	|
8. internetional [74]	|	8. MinoRaiola [43]	|	8. Xyloo [52]	|	8. gbianchi [20]	|	8. rdluffy [24]	|	8. Axent.Exchange [12]	|
9. xandry [72]	|	9. Unknown01 [34]	|	9. Balmain [48]	|	9. Paolo.Demidov [19]	|	9. Pumared [23]	|	9. Marmeladka.cc [12]	|
10. mak013 [71]	|	10. 5tift [31]	|	10. Mustang Shelby [48]	|	10. alexrossi [18]	|	10. mikel_012 [23]	|	10. Crystal-Trade.org [11]	|

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [94]	|	1. winspiral [10]	|	1. cryptoaddictchie [45]	|	1. slackovic [42]	|	1. Biirakedee [148]	|	1. khaled0111 [37]	|
2. Husna QA [38]	|	2. G.Seed [5]	|	2. arwin100 [31]	|	2. Daniel91 [37]	|	2. Floxynice [106]	|	2. Kavelj22 [32]	|
3. Luzin [38]	|	3. tuxo [4]	|	3. Peanutswar [30]	|	3. katanic97 [33]	|	3. Africolo [52]	|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	|
4. mu_enrico [33]	|	4. DenisDenis [3]	|	4. GreatArkansas [29]	|	4. ovcijisir [27]	|	4. Agbamoni [51]	|	4. Ochan_yazo_tochant [16]	|
5. AakZaki [32]	|	5. Rocou [3]	|	5. SatsPH [28]	|	5. Pmalek [23]	|	5. Crakryptvest [51]	|	5. OmegaStarScream [15]	|
6. taufik123 [27]	|	6. TryNinja [3]	|	6. PX-Z [27]	|	6. Trofo [22]	|	6. Charles-Tim [38]	|	6. hugeblack [8]	|
7. masulum [27]	|	7. fpelu [3]	|	7. tech30338 [26]	|	7. Rikafip [22]	|	7. PremiumcryptoHub [38]	|	7. RedFlix [7]	|
8. kawetsriyanto [25]	|	8. Delaforetnoire [2]	|	8. Mr. Magkaisa [24]	|	8. examplens [18]	|	8. Mr Reporter [37]	|	8. GxSTxV [4]	|
9. TedMosby [24]	|	9. patrickus [2]	|	9. bhadz [21]	|	9. cryptofrka [18]	|	9. Sammysmart001 [37]	|	9. Mikasa mei [4]	|
10. joniboini [23]	|	10. oscar2000 [2]	|	10. blockman [21]	|	10. dkbit98 [8]	|	10. Jubilee58 [35]	|	10. AnisEverRise [2]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan*	|	Bengali*	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [9]	|	1. JSRAW [32]	|	1. cryptosize [17]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [13]	|	1. qurbanshah02 [75]	|	1. Bd officer [23]	|
2. pawel7777 [4]	|	2. pawanjain [24]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [14]	|	2. NeuroticFish [9]	|	2. JunaidAzizi [43]	|	2. DYING_S0UL [17]	|
3. TryNinja [3]	|	3. Cointikka [24]	|	3. Ultegra134 [7]	|	3. IonCreanga [4]	|	3. Rustam Meraj [27]	|	3. Crypto Library [8]	|
4. EXMON [1]	|	4. Bitcoin Smith [20]	|	4. alani123 [2]	|	4. TryNinja [3]	|	4. HustleZ [27]	|	4. Z_MBFM [7]	|
5. GazetaBitcoin [1]	|	5. Jimmymoriarty [17]	|	5. BitcoinsGreece [1]	|	5. Faazs [2]	|	5. Shussainshah [26]	|	5. Nothingtodo [5]	|
6. ertil [1]	|	6. vivekdhyani1 [15]	|		|	6. Botchain [2]	|	6. snowpega [26]	|	6. Mahiyammahi [4]	|
7. Heiwabitnull [1]	|	7. henmark [14]	|		|	7. antimonycoin [1]	|	7. MusaPk [23]	|	7. Shishir99 [2]	|
	|	8. TheUltraElite [7]	|		|		|	8. Gladitorcomeback [22]	|	8. Negotiation [2]	|
	|	9. eaLiTy [2]	|		|		|	9. Junii [21]	|	9. arzuo [2]	|
	|	10. IIrik11 [2]	|		|		|	10. Noorooo [21]	|	10. Royal Cap [2]	|

You're very welcome

• Quote from: marto25 on Today at 12:22:59 PM
  This context is useful — the rating
  is conditional, not absolute. I will
  look into displaying this distinction
  more clearly in the interface.
  
  Please do so ^{[thank you]}

IIRC, any platform that was relying on AMLBot at that time gave false positive results ^{[due to an ulterior motive]} for eXch-related funds, so the outcome always depends on which AML software they're using ^{[unfortunately, some of them don't even mention the name of the software used for automated checks]}.
^{- Their support has also explicitly mentioned "KYC procedures are sometimes required".}

Thank you both for the valuable input.

I contacted Trocador directly regarding
Swapuz after SFR10's comment.

Their explanation: Swapuz receives an A
rating only when using their own liquidity
for specific coins and under a certain
amount. Otherwise the rating is B.
Trocador monitors exchanges continuously
and downgrades or suspends them when
AML block rates increase.

This context is useful — the rating
is conditional, not absolute. I will
look into displaying this distinction
more clearly in the interface.

examplens — your approach of contacting
exchange support for an AML pre-check
before swapping is excellent advice
for users dealing with funds that may
have touched flagged services.

null_route
cetoc.org/zero/zerotrace.html

This fingerprinting vulnerability is about changing to a dofferent VPN server:
If you want a website to think you're the same person, you wouldn't be moving to a different server.

I am happy to share about Xapo as I genuinely think it is a great bank, and am very happy about their services. Even if I got absolutely no referral revenue from them, I would still talk positively and share my experience about this bank.

Anyways, I can get some of you are suspicious as this is common in this "industry".

Cheers

I think at start yeah we can say way back before that he's independent blockchain investigator, but now that he's accepting donations from those companies this one give stain on his reputation and obviously I think make them not an independent investigator anymore.

Some argue that he's still an independent since he disclose all the donations he receive and he's transparent with that. But the question there is he going to give fair investigation result if the subject is one of those companies donates huge funds to him?

Yeah, that’s kinda where I’m at too. People on X throw around “on-chain evidence” nonstop, but half the time it’s selective screenshots and giant assumption chains.

That said, the optics definitely look bad if someone is publicly presenting themselves as fully independent while also receiving money from major industry figures and protocols they cover. Even if the donations were legit and transparent, people are naturally gonna question whether it affects what gets investigated and what doesn’t.

The Hyperliquid point is probably the most interesting part honestly — if he was heavily critical before and then suddenly stopped after funding came in, people are gonna connect dots whether it’s fair or not. But correlation alone still isn’t proof of corruption.

The token manipulation accusations are another level though. Those would need actual wallet tracking + receipts, not just “trust me bro” threads. Crypto Twitter loves building narratives fast.

Do you think this turns into a real credibility problem for Zach long term, or just another week of crypto drama before everyone moves on?