Let’s just remember that all casinos operate strictly for business purposes nothing more, nothing less. So, in all honesty,

if anyone is going to benefit first, it’s definitely the casino platform before the players. If a crypto casino has a lot of gamblers, it means many people trust that casino, and it’s obvious that profit is coming in. It’s really that simple to understand.

Yes they provably gonna use that until they could see many people availing those bonuses they offer. Maybe there are several people didn't use it, but there's provably lot more people try their luck to acquire those bonus offers they get from here.

Well for sure their intention is to make people think not to go to other casino because they have lots of bonuses to get from this casino. Also for sure casino itself would continue to do it as long as they can convince people to stay and that promotion will yield more profits to their platform.

I guess the casino still wants to make use of this promotion to stay in the marketing path, either used by many or not the bonus offer remains valid for anyone to enjoy only after meeting the requirement. The requirement is the only thing stopping many from participating and it’s obvious the casino will not offer anything free without getting a good return so it’s left for anyone to ignore or use besides casino bonus is not a mandatory offer.

Second to last update before the final results.
To sum it up, we are 4 (maybe 5) for 3 places. I think this is the first time it's been this close.

Pos	Users	16/12/2025
1	internetional	1 261,71
2	paid2	1 233,44
3	LoyceV	1 199,97
4	Halab	1 167,06
5	GazetaBitcoin	1 050,44
6	sompitonov	932,24
	Bitcoin	877,82
7	DireWolfM14	826,06
8	memehunter	806,89
9	examplens	756,79
10	ajiz138	685,28
11	icopress	611,27
12	n0nce	547,05
	Average	490,63
13	FinneysTrueVision	489,82
14	rat03gopoh	489,65
15	B1g4udge	489,49
16	shahzadafzal	471,12
17	DYING_S0UL	469,77
18	Smartprofit	444,01
19	GrosWesh	418,51
20	Rikafip	404,22
21	Despairo	348,86
22	LogitechMouse	346,09
23	Saint-loup	345,07
24	jokers10	338,27
25	SamReomo	335,08
26	Taskford	304,69
27	tokeweed	302,69
	Random_but_balanced	299,56
28	xandry	290,26
29	Woodie	257,92
30	cryptofrka	254,80
31	klarki	230,60
32	Buchi-88	209,62
33	bitmover	207,15
34	famososMuertos	205,14
35	worldofcoins	200,48
36	libert19	183,72
37	arallmuus	172,77
38	Koal-84	136,74
39	xLays	106,83
40	slackovic	93,60

                  

Line chart race : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/
LCR without Woodie  : https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/24269401/

---

You may be wondering where is the thread for 2026. I haven't created one because I don't plan to organise it for next year. This ocntest will be the last, at least in this format. I want to do another game, but finding a sponsor is more complicated than I thought. If it happens, I will let you know here.

Exolix je mjenačnica koja je jednom liku na forumu poslala ether koji potiče od nekog hacka ili krađe, priznali da je njihova greška i rekli da mu ne mogu pomoći. To bi prekrižio.
Za Swapuz sam čuo ali ih nisam nikad koristio niti sam čitao negdje iskustva o njima. Poznati su mi sa KYCnot stranice gdje nemaju baš dobru ocjenu, ali to se ne može ni očekivati kad ponekak traže da se uradi KYC i AML provjera. U svakom slučaju, dobro i korisno za znati. Čak i ako je sustav spor bolje i spor a siguran nego brz pa problemi.

That’s really all there is to it,  it’s simple to understand. If we just use common sense: why would we stop something we clearly see is widely embraced, when so many people actively enjoy and take advantage of the offerings? Clearly, it’s fulfilling a real desire among users.

Just imagine if this were suddenly removed, wouldn’t countless gamblers be frustrated or deeply disappointed? Obviously.  So naturally, if a casino values its players, it will keep these features—and likely even expand them because they know it keeps their users happy and engaged.

We don't have a tracker, but I can tell you which services are currently disabled. Aside from services that have shut down (for instance AgoraDesk) and excluding services which were found to be scams (VigorSwap, CoreSwap, etc.), the following services are currently disabled:

• CoinCraddle - for either not getting any traffic or lying about the traffic they were getting.
• Flyp.me - for lack of communication.

Additionally CCE is currently enabled on our end, but in long-term maintenance on theirs, so they don't appear.

Finally the following services are enabled, but only appear on the results page (and not in the table on the homepage) due to very low review scores:

• NeverKYC
• OctoSwap

I agree since they provably won't let this continue if there's no people used it. But since maybe they see that there are lots of people claim those offers then play that maybe give them him to continue what they are doing.

Also for sure they are monitoring this closely, since if this is been truly ignore for sure they will start abandoning giving free bonuses and might think about giving attractive offer.

So since those things exist that really shows those actions they show is effective enough to justify those offering they did.

Is it possible that because there are some people who use these free bonuses, that is the reason the casino has continued offering them? Or don't you think that if the offers were generally ignored, the casino would have made some improvement to make it enticing?

I think so, what do you think?

Ah, glad that worked! Happens when there's some issue with the cache and it has to be properly cleared.

That same thing flashed briefly before the correct contents eventually loaded.



Perhaps try a CTRL+F5?

This is a difference between Rainbet and Stake:

Rainbet
No, sir. Rainbet has the largest weekly payment allocation, around $9,060 for its 174 participants.
However, Rainbet has a selective manager team.

Rainbet only pays for 20 posts per week, which minimizes spam from each participant.
The manager does not maintain participants who have financial misconduct RedTrust, especially those proven to have committed fraud in signature campaigns or bounties.

---

Stake
Their weekly payment allocation is around $5,000 for 65 participants.
Stake pays up to 60–70 posts for all participants, which creates a lot of spam from a single participant who makes posts within less than a 10 minute interval.
The manager is less selective, even cow, chicken and buffalo farms with RedTrust tags are still being used, possibly for that spam.

From these differences, we actually already know which one is better.
This data was taken from both spreadsheets for comparison.

The topics button indicates how many topics you selected (if any):



Maybe if I add a border around the button, idk?

What do you mean?

You select the topic the way you're doing, then you close this dialog, and search normally.

That literally does not do anything, so fuck off scamming pajeet.

Counting the number of posts it not equal to "managing" something, therefore this junk campaign does not have any managers. Nevertheless, indulge me. Who are these users? Can you you post their profiles?

you might be right on that, but at least for the bonus roulette i think it got to be random based on some odds to make it more intresting (i could be wrong).

so far, on the 1st day i got a $15 no risk bet.
2nd day it was free spins requiring a $30 depo with 40x wager, 1.5x claim (i just canceled it)
today i got another no risk bet, but only $5 this time.



maybe i just got lucky with the bonuses, but so far i'm happy with what i got, and there are still many more chances to get more good stuff (12 days to be exact).

that should be obvious, but sometimes some of those "free bonuses" are so bad, the casino would have been better off not having them at all.

I understand that, which is why I decided to ask this question and get an answer. Thanks everyone for your answers. I'll check out this service a little later and check the prices.

I thought the exchange would initially act as a marker maker until it gained enough users.

To je istina. Ali ne sjećam se da sam igdje vidio da državljani neke članice EU ne mogu koristiti neki CEX. Viđao sam tako nešto za USA ali ne za EU. Želim reći da neki CEX zaboli za pravila EU ako im je sjedište na nekom egzotičnom mjestu gdje im EU ne može ništa. Ili sam možda u krivu? U svakom slučaju, ja nastavljam koristiti Blofin dokle god nema obavezan KYC.

Update:
DT 1
     1. 30747: Vod (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2360 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 51173: mprep (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 1724 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2666 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9956 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2396 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 3232 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 8920 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 8322 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 120837: vizique (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1662 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (18) 6086 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1879 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (10) 6341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (31) 1838 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1385 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 12549 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5960 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 6533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 314792: examplens (Trust: +9 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (22) 3207 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (28) 9240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +138 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 699 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3490 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 11067 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11230 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 525 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4497 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2366 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 4170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (57) 19559 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2895 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1324 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 987 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +35 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 442 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3569 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1108 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +52 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1239 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6468 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4015 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (15) 1805 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2131 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1906 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 5119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4273 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 14921 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2138 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 3091 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +77 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 11054 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1302 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2180 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1981 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9020 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1291828: TheBeardedBaby (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3310 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3131 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 7124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +41 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (7) 1354 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3677 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3150 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 19478 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2257 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2404 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2425 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 5215 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 5156 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1485 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +43 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (8) 3225 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1872 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3785 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 803 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1544 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1103 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5327 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7464 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1750 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9125 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1524 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5056 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 9031 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6095 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1170 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2947 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6633 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3506304: God Of Thunder (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1360 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (8136 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (13754 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 203: HostFat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (9109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Tako piše na portalima. Ne sjećam se gdje sam pročitao tu vijest, ali sad sam malo tražio i pronašao primjerice ovu vijest. Zanimljivo kako u tekstu članka na jednom mjestu pišu da je umirovljenica iz Dubrovnika ostala bez više od pola milijuna eura jer je nasjela na priču o ulaganju u kriptovalute. Kao da su kriptovalute krive za to ili da će ovaj zakon onemogućiti takve prijevare.


Piše da će CEX-ovi koji djeluju na području EU (zapravo nisam siguran radi li se o CEX-ovima kojima je sjedište u EU ili koji djeluju na području EU) morati automatski podatke dostavljati Poreznoj upravi države u kojoj djeluju, a onda ta Porezna uprava automatski šalje podatke Poreznoj upravi zemlje iz koje je korisnik. Ali iako je zakon stupio na snagu u četvrtak, u članku piše da će sustavno izvještavanje (što god to bilo) početi tek 2027. godine.


Izgleda da je tako. Ali to se zapravo moglo i očekivati. Čim je Bitcoin postao poznat i kad su se uključili ETF-ovi i razne drugi "veliki igrači", bilo je pitanje vremena kad će države shvatiti koliki novac gube na neprijavljenim porezima u kriptovalutama. Ali opet, nije sve tako crno. Oni kojima se da malo istražiti mogu i dalje sve obavljati preko non-KYC CEX-ova, DEX-ova i slično. Čak sam čitao neki dan članak da uopće nije potrebno koristiti mikser za zaštitu privatnosti transakcija. Dovoljno je nekoliko puta napraviti cross-chain bridge i to značajno otežava praćenje transakcija. Nisam siguran koliko je to istina, ali eto... Možda tema o kojoj bi se dalo raspravljati.

Seems the browser issue again I tried after into different profile with the betpanda and seems same error and afterwards I tried to test it out with the Microsoft edge and it seems works fine without problem in loading, I cleared my cache now.

After I opened my account now I got a message received from the betpanda I thought a cashback instead I got this free spins!

I think direct exchange means exchange one asset directly to another, like BTC to USDT
While multistage exchange while from let say BTC to XRP and then to USDT. Apparently, a user can even earn some "profit" from this.

I think they made updates specifically in the Russian board.

I think it's a real trade, the one who left him positive feedback is an old user.

But, the way @OP take the positive feedback seriously seems like he has a hidden purpose why he did these trades. If the reason is the buyer can't trust @OP because @OP has no successful trading, it's make sense. However, I didn't find someone complain for @OP didn't have any positive feedback/trade history.

The fact that Op specializes in collectibles, looking at his post history, this makes his trust more questionable with none with a references.

It is better to be cautious when doing business with Op especially currently.

Tried logging in using chrome (desktop), firefox (mobile), as well as some other browsers including TOR, no issue from my end! It's probably a user sided bug!
Anyway, in most of the cases, the most simplest fastest and easiest solution for me was a quick restart and clearing the cache! Works every time!

I umm... actually update them weekly, during Sunday [initially], but I am well aware that my next update is about one month overdue. Life just currently take the better of me and [though it doesn't justify my lack of weekly update for other "real" cases] most of the cases on SA are currently about BC and INR of which I don't consider as a SA and thus won't add to the list [TBH, it's because if I add those cases that resolves in days after escalated, I'll run out of space very very quickly].

The gap of 6 months inactivity is because an update doesn't bump the thread. And [if I may be honest and didn't mean any offense] I don't want to post a "bump" just to bring this thread to the first page because I don't feel like posting meaningless post and the "bump" post itself is [in my very personal opinion] sounds very narcisisstic.

And that's exactly what i meant in my last reply. It's fully understandable that forum policy can cut with advertisements for mixers in all its kinds, however discussions about a particular mixer whether it's scam or legitimate shouldn't be banned or limited. A stick thread notice can help introducing the limits to general discussions in specific boards such as Scam and Accusations board or Service Discussion board. Just my two cents.

That mixer was a scam, and under conventional moderation it would've been banned from the forum ages ago. So it's not really representative of the full situation tbh.


I am convinced that if Monero was a service, it's developers would've been arrested and charged by now. (Not for tax evasion a la fluffypony but for MSB voliation charges)

But I don't think feds are particularly interested in coinjoin software. Samourai only got seized because they were loudmouths, and if they had managed to control their indignation then none of this would've happened.

I think cases where innocent people losing money to fake mixers is something that will continue. People will always stumble across fake websites using similar names and designs to existing mixers. There will always be scamming and phishing websites regardless of what might be posted in the forum.

It is however prudent to have an easily accessible list about the websites to avoid as it just might help save an innocent person from getting scammed. Whether that list would be available in the forum or elsewhere, having one does make sense.

Previously, I also tried to answer it based on the information I found in the Bitgoro Telegram channel;

---
Based on the information I obtained on December 8, 2025 from their Telegram channel, in summary, Bridgoro is still undergoing improvements after receiving a lot of feedback from testers during the Beta Test period. The public release of Bridgoro is likely delayed for this purpose (bug fixes, etc.), and the launch is expected to take place in January 2026. Going forward, the Bridgoro project may also be developed beyond just a no-KYC P2P exchange.

For more detailed information regarding the above, you can refer to:
https://t.me/bridgoro_exchange/20

This service did not strike me as a mixer too. However, sending coin type x to get the same coin type x is considered as a mixer according to theymos description somewhere where x = Bitcoin. When we think of a mixer we consider a single service, a service provider that take your Bitcoin and after a given time of delay it gives you your Bitcoin back after taking some fees. But in service like SplitNOW you are not only restricted to a single service. You are:
1. Using it to process a multi payment for you by staying anonymous. Yes, you can anonymize your own coins too. Depending how you are using it when it's same coin.
2. You are using it as an exchange with an option to receive multiple other currency.
3. You are using it as an aggregator
There are many other purpose can be served by SplitNOW where with a mixing service that we have in mind only serve a single purpose.

Habby birthday, padawan!!!


Loooooooooool! How could I forget that?


Now you did to NF what I did to you. See? You scared him!

---

This reminded me of wolwoo, for some reason

It's not the first mixer that claims not to be a mixer. But theymos' defition in the OP says otherwise.
Let's say you're a business and want to make a "send to many" transaction like my screenshot above. You have 1 Bitcoin and want to send it to 3 addresses. Which option would you choose:

• Get your spreadsheet, copy a CSV, paste it into Electrum, pay $0.05 in on-chain transaction fees, and be done.
• Get your spreadsheet, copy the first address, copy the first amount, copy the second address, copy the second amount, copy the third address, copy the third amount, and paste all of this into a brand new website where you send and risk 1 Bitcoin and pay a $1200 fee to get coins withdrawn from 3 different exchanges while giving an unknown website the chance to exit scam you.

Real privacy is more challenging than paying someone $1200 to split your Bitcoin into 3 parts.

In that case you can tell me which one of 3 points in theymos' OP doesn't fit this website

Normal exchanges don't fit this criterion:

I'd say this goes back to the reason mixers were banned in the first place:

Those are valid questions. Just like banks are still laundering money and get away with a fine.
The Dutch BNR Crypto Update just compared the massive prison sentences in crypto to the complete lack punishment when banks fucked up big time in 2008. It's almost as if governments are protecting their based-on-nothing fiat money.

Unfortunately (as a Liverpool-fan) I have to agree.

It's looking tough for Liverpool this season. As defending champions, they're surprisingly sitting 10th after 15 games with 23 points and a 0 goal difference (!). You are right, structural issues seem evident, and without key additions like Isak or Wirtz (both are not "present" anymore), climbing back will be challenging. Of course, it is still mid-season and there is room for turnaround, but title odds are long and I am not sure if they can manage to perform this turnaround ...

I don't think this is exactly a mixer. Certainly it is good to call theymos attention to it, so he can decide to be more flexible or not about this ban.

But splitting UTXO in different wallets isn't a mixer neither a coinjoin. As far as I understand this service, you won't receive other people coins, only when exchanging.

It still has a touch of a mixer as no account creation is required. In the same example let's change XMR with BTC. If I send you BTC and then swap it to ETH, then send the ETH again and swap it to BTC again. Doesn't this mean I get fresh BTC considering always that the first deposit was from a stolen funds and I use VPN to access the service and no accouts or KYC are required.

And if one of the addresses is flagged later after completing the swap, what you plan to do with authorities?

I am not against privacy and I wish there are many exchanges offering privacy swaps, but some questions are worth the answer.

From what have garner and been sticking with is that the forum is against anything that improves privacy
And promotes Non KYC policy for all customers.
I know some may argue with my usage of anything but that's how I am really picturing it.
The truth is privacy is just a fairytale dream.

yeah, but the 27 minutes here is not time waiting for a nrtwork confirmatoin, it's just how long it took for them to send it, and i don't think they would need to manually verfty such a small amount for a rank 10 player.

maybe the hot wallet was empty or something, who knows.
but one thing for sure, the withdrawals are not instant, but they are usually very fast, i have a few withdrawals before, and all were sent within 5 minutes.

i would only start worying if it's +24 hours and nothing has been sent.