BTC: $64,557
💞 examplens

The discussions were supposed to be about denying/proving b1ack's connection to darknet activities or denying/proving that the platform was funded by darknet carding and stolen VCCs. But it moved on to whoever deserved $100.

The funny thing is, if you go back to page 2, you'll find the same accusations against the campaign members; neither of them helps in reaching a conclusion.

But will it be a honeypot made from that sweet delicious honey comb from hives in the apple growing areas of NY?

Seriously, I did not know about this thread until someone pointed it out to me since I am wearing their sig at the moment.
There are a lot more exchanges / services like this all over. Just not advertised here.

Coming out and picking on just one shows it be more of an attack on them then anything else.

There are large(ish) exchanges that you can move $10k a day / $50k a month w/o KYC out there.
All you need is a VPN and an email address. It's not like services like this are hard to find.

-Dave

It's the same argument that was often used against ChipMixer and the participants of their campaign.  And as in those arguments, lots of accusations with little substance, and no evidence.  It's just a matter of time before we see an accusation claiming that b1exh is an NSA honeypot.

da unser Lafu momentan leider nicht die zeit hat, uns hier in diesem thema aktuell zu halten, möchte ich ihn etwas unter die arme greifen und euch das update für den monat februar veröffentlichen
im februar waren 113 user berechtigt in die dt-liste mit aufgenommen zu werden:

alte dt1-liste:

neue dt1-liste:

aus unserem deutschsprachigen bereich sind insgesamt 10 leute vertreten: Buchi-88, willi9974, Real-Duke, Lafu, polymerbit, Kryptowerk, mole0815, Lakai01, efialtis und bullrun2024bro
hier ist nochmal der original beitrag von theymos: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg66361122#msg66361122

wer genau rausgeflogen ist und wer dafür neu aufgenommen wurde, dies könnt ihr aus dieser liste entnehmen:

Round 2 is now over.

With the withdrawal of 5 players, your chances of winning have just skyrocketed. Thank them.

Here are the results of Round 2 :

Closing price on 11/02/2026 : 66 938$

Name	Prediction	Block	B/M	Min	Max	Final prediction	Difference
TryNinja	69 119,16	935867	0,50	68 773,56	69 464,76	68 773,56	1 836
examplens	68 999,00	935899	0,25	68 826,50	69 171,50	68 826,50	1 889
promise444c5	68 500,00	935948	-0,50	68 157,50	68 842,50	68 842,50	1 905
cryptofrka	69 755,00	935901	0,75	69 231,84	70 278,16	69 231,84	2 294
Becassine	69 438,67	935855	0,25	69 265,07	69 612,27	69 265,07	2 327
Pmalek	69 318,00	935856	-0,50	68 971,41	69 664,59	69 664,59	2 727
mv1986	70 333,33	935953	0,75	69 805,83	70 860,83	69 805,83	2 868
Leahized	70 527,00	935951	0,75	69 998,05	71 055,95	69 998,05	3 060
GazetaBitcoin	69 923,00	935923	-0,50	69 573,39	70 272,62	70 272,62	3 335
LoyceV	69 949,13	935949	-0,50	69 599,38	70 298,88	70 298,88	3 361
Hypnotizer	70 208,40	935875	-0,25	70 032,88	70 383,92	70 383,92	3 446
ESG	63 300,00	935888	-0,75	62 825,25	63 774,75	62 825,25	4 113
Doan9269	72 600,00	935934	-0,25	72 418,50	72 781,50	72 781,50	5 844
BABY SHOES	72 938,00	935933	-0,50	72 573,31	73 302,69	73 302,69	6 365
Danydee	72 950,00	935948	-0,50	72 585,25	73 314,75	73 314,75	6 377
LogitechMouse	73 696,69	935866	0,50	73 328,21	74 065,17	73 328,21	6 390
xLays	73 594,00	935948	-0,50	73 226,03	73 961,97	73 961,97	7 024
Mr. Magkaisa	77 777,00	935950	-0,50	77 388,12	78 165,89	78 165,89	11 228

                                                

You had the opportunity to rob me, but you didn't. I can't stop you from being bad predictors. There has to be a winner, and that winner is you : TryNinja. You will be pleasantly surprised to see 50BTC in your account.
Sorry Mr. Magkaisa, I advise you to destroy the '7' key on your keyboard. You lose one life.

For the round 3… Errr wait, do you smell that ?? What is that smell ??
Aaaaah yes, it’s the smell of love. Saturday is Valentine’s Day. Even here, you won’t escape it. I feel like spreading love.
I know that in 2026 consent is important, but not in this game. You must "love" someone !
Be careful, love is like marriage, it's for better or for worse. I won’t say more.

---

Round 3 : The round of love

What will be the price of Bitcoin at February 17, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 16/02/2026)?
Submit your predictions before February 15, 2026, 12:00:00 AM

Cash shop: OPEN

Special rules :
In addition to Bitcoin’s price, you must choose your “Valentine” among the participants still in the game.
If you don’t choose your Valentine, your prediction will not be valid.
A person can be chosen by several people.

---

We can say that for this round, these are the first interactions between players.

Yeah possible even Aai generated post...

I think hiring a professional campagin manager is the ideal way to promote a new brand in bitcointalk. Community support is very important.

I advice you to create an ANN in altcoinstalks.com as well.

I believe that might happened due to absence of a block for such long duration but what @examplens said about Ethereum chain halt might be another reason why it took so long time for completion of the swap. At least,the ETH arrived, and it's good to hear that reverse swapping didn't take much time and was done quickly. I believe the issue might not be b1exch's end but it most likely happened due to Bitcoin block delay or Ethereum blockchain halting.

That's correct. In addition we often have more access through the various dashboards the services we list use.

If you run into any issue contact us via the live chat on the site or email or on SimpleX with the order ID.

It's possible for a service to modify its site to confirm their story, but that we've only ever seen happen with exit scams. In those cases we see multiple negative reports per hour and they're all clearly written by different people.

Good afternoon.

The wording regarding the alleged seizure of user funds is incorrect. If a user’s funds are flagged as high risk based on the AML check, an additional verification is initiated. If the user successfully passes this verification and confirms the legal origin of the funds, the transaction will either be returned or processed accordingly.

If the legal origin of the funds is not confirmed, further actions are carried out strictly in accordance with applicable laws and suspicious transaction reporting requirements. In all cases, neither the exchange service nor the exchange itself appropriates user funds or uses them for its own purposes.

At this moment, we have agreed with KuCoin on the possibility of checking client wallets before an order is created. This functionality has already been implemented on our website. However, this is a temporary measure, and we plan to discontinue it in the future.

I saw that review and found it odd, but not surprising.  It would have been nice if AccountsLegend had left a meaning reference link, but it doesn't look like he bothered to write a post about it.  I can't find any mention of the accusation in either account's post history.  AccountsLegend's own list of red-tags notwithstanding, without any proof of his accusation it's just hearsay.

Is he? He's not in gambling that much so I'd never say.
If true, that surely puts Croatia on top in user quality/total users metrics.

_______________________

Svi znamo eng, ako kome smeta tužite me adminima

In both sinbad and cm campagins I received everything it was due, as a participant.

It is probably that the managers could have some funds left after making all payments .. but what would they do with that money? As the service is gone, money cant even be given back to services...

Yes the 0$ depicts the deposit made by those exchanges to antikyc, it does not reflect our guarantee.


Once again, tainted funds will be refunded by the exchanges that have the appropriate tag if the swap was created through antikyc. 

We are not familiar with the case you linked, but thanks for the feedback.

As far as I remember, there was no discussion on this topic, nor did DS receive any feedback regarding it. We can only guess what happened to the remaining funds, but if I had to guess personally, I would say that he donated those funds because he never seemed to me like a person who would keep something that does not belong to him. What I would do is distribute them in equal amounts to each campaign participant and thus prevent these kinds of discussions from even happening.

Yes, thanks for the advice.
A few years ago I participated in a lot of signature campaigns on this forum, but then, due to personal circumstances, I had to take a break from this forum for a while.
Now I simply don't want to put too much expectation and pressure on myself.
I want to write here when I have free time and when I have some inspiration or desire to participate in a discussion that interests me, and not because of the pressure that I have to write a certain number of posts for some signature campaign.
I signed up for your campaign because the conditions suit me and because there is not as much pressure as with some other signature campaigns. I have no intention of creating any additional pressure for myself, but I want to write and participate in forum discussions as before, freely and naturally.
Thank you for your understanding.

Personally ever since the CoinTor exit scam, I have always tested new mixers/exchanges before adding them to the site. Unless Royse or ico recommended them to me. So no. The bolts have just been tightened, that's all.

There's a lot of services who don't really use Bitcointalk as you can see, so sometimes, outreach is required.

You can ask examplens how to become the top 1 most desired poster on the forum. 

I did some more research and found that the BitcoinvVN exchanger has been positively commented from the Best_change's official Bitcointalk forum account. However, this does not mean that they are saying that we are 100% safe with big amounts here.

However, after your comment, I'm a little afraid that if I withdraw directly from Binance here, I will face any problems later. 

---

By the way, I would like to draw NotATether attention because I see on their bitmixlist website that the BitcoinVN platform was founded in 2014, but unexpectedly when I check their website whois.com, I see that their platform was registered on 2018-03-21. I will request NotATether to check and verify this, and put the correct time in the Founded cell.

Ofc I like to be paid in my own wallet.

However  , I think k some of the best paid campagins i ever joined were paid in their website
Particularly yolodice and Blackjack.

After a few months I got used to the payment method and it was good that I kept the money in the lending system of the platforms and I only made  withdrawals after a month or two.

But those services already had a reputation here, they were in the forum for many ma years years already when I joined their campagins

Thank you for the constructive feedback, we really appreciate it.

Just to clarify how access currently works on our platform:

• UTXO analysis is available without login, with up to 5 free address scans per day.
• Explorer features (address, transaction, block, mempool data) are fully free and unlimited, no account required.
• The only feature that is restricted without an account is TX Simulation, as it is resource-intensive and designed primarily for advanced use cases.
• API access is also limited to registered users.

That said, anyone can create an account and start a 7-day Pro trial:
• No payment required 
• No credit card or billing details 
• All features fully unlocked during the trial period 

Our goal is to let users properly test the platform before making any decision, while still protecting infrastructure from abuse.

We’re continuously evaluating the balance between open access and sustainability, and feedback like yours helps us improve that balance.

Thanks again for taking the time to share your thoughts.

Described the situation more better - Slot has been poor in in-game management this season. This is not the first or second time they're losing from a winning position this season. He needs to fix up and I think England still have the 5 slots for next season CL.


They won in the first half and had the game under control. Wow what's happening Emery- they've lost 6 points in the last two games, which isn't looking good..

Na žalost, činjenica je da kriptovalute koriste i ovakvi tipovi za pranje novca a i obični kriminalci.
Kada prosječni ljudi čitaju takve vijesti i čuju da je netko oteo nekoga i traži otkupninu u kriptovalutama, ili slično, javna percepcija je onda da se kriptovalute koriste samo za kriminalne aktivnosti.
Na žalost, tu nema pomoći i predviđam još stroža pravila koje će države uvoditi radi kontrole tokova kriptovaluta.
U političkom prostoru javna percepcija i dojam da se nešto radi su uvijek važniji od konkretnih učinaka neke mjere.

A very good addition to the project. I am seeing the project is being improved and polished the right way day by day. Good work, Ninja.


Haha, what a clever answer. By the way, Talkimg is also a quite active website and has a good count of traffic, and as far as I remember, I have seen its promotion ads off-forum, but I don't remember clearly where I saw that.


Thank you, mate, for bringing users' attention back to the on-topic discussion.

Although I'll say I a kinda appreciate that the reason for my post deletion and pointing out my flaws was brought to my notice by leaving a comment in my trust, at least it made me pick up on my lapses and to make the appropriate corrections moving forward, with that being said, I have left a neutral comment on your profile, thanks again.

I'm not moderator or admin, so i never delete any of your post.

---

It's up to debate and i'm aware some people disagree with how i use trust system. Here's my past reply to other member who asked similar question.

---

See what i stated on this thread.

---

User: aysha9853

Additional information (optional):
* This account received at least 2 accusation of spamming with AI/chatbot, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66206496#msg66206496 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66187359#msg66187359.
* This account may be hacked, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506921.msg66212584#msg66212584.
* This account is part of sockpuppet/account farm who spam with AI/chatbot, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573695.0.

List of post:


Another user explain what's wrong with post on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5572683.msg66384473#msg66384473.


1. Many points already estate by other member.
2. While people use term SegWit for so many things, SegWit wallet is stukk valid term since it usually refer to wallet that support creating wallet with SegWit address.

Yes, it's a another fee to consider after the withdrawal from cex to your wallet when you want to send it back to another platform. It's just usdt on trx is cheaper to withdraw from cex, at least $1.5 or something. But just like any tokens from these network, eth, trx and binance you need to have a balance for another fee/gas which needs at least $5 since some tx failed due whatever reasons. Tbh i only store usdt in cex to avoid higher fees.

I posted my review on kycnot just a day after the transaction, but it wasn't validated right away. I’m not sure how the KYCnot team handles the validation process for incoming reviews—whether it’s done manually by a dedicated team or automatically, even if it takes a relatively long time.

---

Honestly, I don't really mind whether the 'Valid ID' label shows up or not. I actually agree that transaction history should have an expiration date and get deleted for privacy reasons.
But here’s the thing: if transaction logs can still be disclosed up just by contacting support, that implies the data is still sitting there and can be recovered.

Sorry about this. I noticed a few days ago, but didn't have the time to fix until now.

Good point about the site ending up looking sketchy, because of this.

Our scoring system works close to what you described insofar as every "happy" swap increases an exchange's rating. That's why, although some exchanges have a few negative reviews, they still often have a score of 10.

We only remove negative reviews if they are either untrue, we can't verify them or the user who posted the review removes it. Likely soon we'll add a way to leave a note under a review from the exchange and/or from us.

Negative reviews are only approved after we verify them. A competitor can write a negative review, but they must prove actual wrongdoing.

I also experienced the same thing. I couldn't even change the currency; only the browser would reload. Trying to refresh the page again, I managed to change the currency, but it took at least 1 minute. However, after refreshing several times, the process of changing the currency became faster, although it still required some loading time.

You're right about that, and even now, most gamblers still act that way. That’s why some people who win millions of dollars stop playing as much; they focus more on how to grow their winnings by putting it into a business instead.

On the other hand, there are winners who don't think that way. After winning a huge amount, they keep playing and even become more aggressive because they probably feel like they’ll never run out of money. But it doesn't work like that as you said, gamblers in this industry are often unlucky in the long run.

Update:b]DT 1[/b]
     1. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 301 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (17) 9361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 4651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1729 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2675 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10345 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2462 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 85033: d5000 (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (3) 9191 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6055 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +49 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1635 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 123824: albon (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1789 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +57 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6152 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2384 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 140584: EFS (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1980 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 466 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 164749: stompix (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (9) 6399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1853 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1509 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2293 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2765 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6014 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6589 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 9484 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +133 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 3185 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +36 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11213 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 11487 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2507 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 407174: klarki (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (58) 20037 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 6244 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2959 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +11 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9184 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1345 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3866 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1398 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3604 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1121 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6581 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4101 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2190 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 15108 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2175 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3170 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +78 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (35) 11553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1347 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2216 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2002 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 9106 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2437 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3227 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11250 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3192 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3791 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1836948: Bthd (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2603 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 19845 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2307 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2462 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 2469 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 5311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +40 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3415 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3869 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1551 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1108 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5425 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 7673 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1808 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +7 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9298 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1545 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1219 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 646 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 6877 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    95. 3540187: apogio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2376 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (8339 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 35: theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (13959 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2252: laanwj (Trust:  neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (196 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Who said they bought at $60k?

The article linked on the topic says, on the first paragraph:


They are not in profit.

Hello everyone,

Round 1 has delivered its verdict. Here are the results :

Closing price on 06/02/2026 : 70524$

Name	Difference
LogitechMouse	827
ESG	1 716
Danydee	2 851
LoyceV	3 880
Leahized	4 195
xLays	4 476
Pmalek	4 780
examplens	5 250
GazetaBitcoin	5 999
BABY SHOES	6 265
Mr. Magkaisa	7 253
promise444c5	8 576
cryptofrka	8 976
TryNinja	10 445
Hypnotizer	11 475
Doan9269	12 126
Becassine	13 218

            

Congratulations LogitechMouse, the rebound in recent hours has been good for you. You win this first round and your wallet has been credited with 50 BTC.
Aaah dear Becassine, many people dreamed of taking your ♥, but I will just take one life from you. You now only have one left. Don't be sad. It’s time for you to switch to survivor mode.

Now let's talk about Round 2.
If I understand correctly, you like Bitcoin here. You eat Bitcoin, you dream Bitcoin, you shit Bitcoin. The Bitcoin blockchain have no secrets for you. So let’s spice things up a bit with this blockchain.
In addition to the Bitcoin price, you will have to submit a block number that will determine your bonus or… your malus.
You thought that just avoiding risks would be enough to survive. Well, it’s going to be a bit more complicated than that. And you will only know your bonus or malus after the topic lock (normally).
But you're going to say "It’s not fair !!!". That's true. Don’t blame me. Blame the blockchain and your own choice.
I promised you surprises, I hope you are not disappointed.

---

Round 2 : The blockchain-lottery

What will be the price of Bitcoin at February 12, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 11/02/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before February 09, 2026, 07:00:00 PM

Cash shop: OPEN

In addition to the Bitcoin price, you must specify a block number between 935850 and 935950.
Each block has a block hash, and the last character of this hash will determine the bonus or malus you get, according to the following table :

0-6-C-I-O-U	0,25% bonus
1-7-D-J-P-V	0,25% malus
2-8-E-K-Q-W	0,50% bonus
3-9-F-L-R-X	0,50% malus
4-A-G-M-S-Y	0,75% bonus
5-B-H-N-T-Z	0,75% malus

            

For example:
If you had chosen block 935266, the block hash is 00000000000000000000adee26d2d23098b46a248856f729e5607e959750df45. The last character is 5, so you would have received a 0.75% bonus.
If you had chosen block 935265, the block hash is 00000000000000000001b884074997c02a156312d1df2cbf46781f0a82a2666d. The last character is D, so you would have received a 0.25% malus.

If you do not provide a block number, your prediction will be invalid.

Yeah, but put yourself in their shoes: they don't know anything about the forum, so they can't even assess if the campaign is performing as expected as they have nothing to compare it to. It would make sense to see which manager's strategy brings the best results. That's assuming they have a way to accurately measure the results. They could do it with tracker links, but there's a risk that could be abused by creating fake sign ups etc, so it's not perfect.
It could also be that they didn't want to overload one manager with too much work, or it could be a risk management tactic to mitigate risk of handing too much funds to one person (which they might not be familiar with at all).
My first reaction was also that it's not a very elegant move towards managers and creates a bit of a low-trust environment, but, at the end of the day, it's their money and their choice.

I think its because the site don't work with javascript for dom manipulation for easier load of data, so every changes comes from the server side and needs always a refresh for the page's changes to show.

A few changes regarding the service uptime:

- Added a legend that explains each color.
- Changed the logic so a >= 95% uptime on the daily is enough to show as "up".
- Changed to only shows the latest 30 days of uptime (less clutter).
- Changed "partial" wording to "occasionally unavailable".

---

Changed to that, thanks.

Yes, that was already there before.

This is one good reason why knowledge on bankroll management is highly needed.  Although it is debatable whether a gambler will lose in the long run I am incline to believing it because of the house edge.  Witht he house edge, chance game with 50-50 chance will become 51-49 chance in favor of the casino.  That 2% gap is huge enough to make a tremendous impact on the bankroll and on chance of winning in the long run.


For me, no matter the reason, whether it be for fun or profit, one must never forget to gamble responsibly.

Nothing new about this and people already know that facts and this is the reason why we have seen people says they gamble just to have fun. Maybe some of them tells the truth and other may just say that word to condition their mind not to get hurt when they lose.

In game of chance chances to lose is high since house always win in long run, that's why in this case those irresponsible gamblers will provably end up losing.

Although there's still no guarantee on sports betting, but if you are familiar with sports this and frequently watching it this will give those bettors advantage to win on their placed bets.

This thing you said has absolutely nothing to do with a gambler being lucky and winning in a game of chance or being unlucky and losing.
It is already a known fact that when it comes to game of chance, losing is more guaranteed in the long term than winning, you can gamble and win a million dollars today and be in massive profit, but as long as you keep gambling, you will end up losing all of this money in the course of the months or years depending on how responsible or irresponsible you Gamble.

This is why myself always treat game of chance as game of fun where I do not play them and anticipate to make profit, but I play simply to have fun and that's it, when ever I want to gamble to make profit, I go for sports betting where I have some level of control even though chance still has its way as well.

Withdrawals already stopped working before the announced that they were closing, so for any one who gambled with the balance on their account and luckily won, there still won't be anyway for them to withdraw the money, and concerning their Announcement about allowing their honest users withdraw their money before the site is shut down finally, there is no guarantee there even going to pay back anybody at all, they could come back to announce that they have allowed all their honest users to withdraw meanwhile in reality, no body is able to withdraw their money.

Anyways, you gambling with the balance you had on your account is exactly the same thing I would have done as well, since it's impossible to withdraw, but think about it, gambling with that fund, and allowing the fund to remain as it is, I do not think there is any difference since withdrawal is not possible.