examplens's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned examplens in the past 7 days

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (57) 14369 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (14) 9540 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4913 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10725 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3409 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9550 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 8618 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1965 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1952 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +16 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6192 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2470 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2105 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6536 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1879 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 757 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2905 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6136 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +33 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6718 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3574 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 9768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 715 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4294 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3657 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4436 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 20586 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +32 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6318 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3031 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9559 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1690 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1488 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3705 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3444 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1942 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2238 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4449 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 15339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2218 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3303 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +83 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 12162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1383 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2258 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9636 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2523 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3418 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 7381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11289 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3198 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1417 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4013 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3370 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2474 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2538 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5553 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 5641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1546 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +50 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3508 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1890 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1283 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 829 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5515 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 7888 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9611 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1552 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 9665 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1242 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 7006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +46 / =0 / -0) (8488 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:01:09 AM

Quote from: dkbit98 on April 16, 2026, 07:00:59 PM

I honestly don't care what stupid metamask wallet is doing, but it might be a good idea to ask them for removal.
There is no way anyone is going to be protected from phishing just because of metamask, and it's silly to have it enabled all the time because they have a bunch of false positives.

The idea was excellent as a prevention against phishing, but it came down to the fact that most often, the competition makes such reports. Almost every smaller exchanger or mixer goes through this.

A few months ago there was a false report of a mixer with strong altcoinstalks presence.

I opened an issue in github and was able to remove the "false positive " in metamask

A few weeks later, that same mixer made an exit scam.

I do t know if metamask was "lucky " but reporting it correctly or if they have some good algorithm that catch a high probability of scam

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:30:23 AM

As for the escrow deposit, I don't know what prompted you to add another $5k, but maybe they rushed you with it. As far as I can see, the current reserves are $22k, so practically over 50% is in your escrow reserves. I think that it would be better if you have larger reserves at this moment, because practically the swap of any coin (except XMR) cannot exceed the escrow reserves. This is good for users, but it limits your offer quite a bit.
It limits you and limits potential growth. Add to that the problem of 3/4 of your reserves being in one currency (XMR).

He edited his post but right from the start, $10K in escrow was the plan. However, he wasn't sure whether to distribute that to 5 people or just one. It appears, he just went with the latter and added the rest to Little Mouse.

I agree with the reserves. It should be their priority at this point.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:30:23 AM

Honestly, both KycNotList and AntiKYC are still quite minor, so the decision to deposit with them in escrow is a bit surprising.

OrangeFren.com would have been a better candidate. Been running for years, and has a solid reputation. Though they could be cautious on listing newly launched exchanges.

Here is their ANN thread if OP is interested: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409616.0

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:05:13 PM

It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.

I am using Firefox and I am getting the same message so I guess its not only restricted to Chrome and Opera.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:05:13 PM

@splashed, you need an urgent reaction.
Someone reported the Metamask splash.tf domain as harmful. It is necessary to request a delisting from the blocklist
It appears on Chrome and Opera, while Firefox and Brave open the site normally.

Code:

[img height=304]https://talkimg.com/images/2026/04/16/UfIIBv.png[/img]

I think it would be better for splashed to be more active on the forum, even though this ANN has been inactive for about ~1 Month without activity, things like this can happen and and also to let forum users know that everything is fine.

Since they don't have a CM representative, I think it would be better if they logged into BTT every 5 days. They haven't accessed the forum since April 5th.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:05:13 PM

I honestly don't care what stupid metamask wallet is doing, but it might be a good idea to ask for removal.
There is no way anyone is going to be protected from phishing just because of metamask, and it's silly to have it enabled all the time because they have a bunch of false positives.

Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 05:45:10 PM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:05:13 PM

Perhaps it would be best to remove MetaMask. Wink

removing from that list is slow and the accuracy of MetaMask blocklist has become poor.

It is possible to open an issue on github about it

https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues

It is common to see people requesting unblocking websites.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 03:05:13 PM

Perhaps it would be best to remove MetaMask. Wink

removing from that list is slow and the accuracy of MetaMask blocklist has become poor.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:53:13 AM

Uzmimo primer ove review kampanje. Nisam siguran sta je target ovde i kako ce se evaluirati rezultat kampanje

Quote from: katanic97 on April 14, 2026, 08:53:18 AM

Nagrade
- Predlozi: ($0.00, ali kvalitetni predlozi mogu biti nagradjeni)
- Manji problemi: $0.50 - $1.00 po prijavi
- Veci problemi: $5.00 - $10.00 po prijavi
- Totalni bugovi: $20.00 - $50.00 po prijavi

Dva poluaktivna ucesnika, uzece po $2-$3. Niti ce vlasnik dobiti realan review, niti ce ucesnici biti zadovoljni nagradom za trud. Posle ce da dodju do zakljucka kako Bitcointalk vise nije vredan ulaganja, protracili su vreme i 'novac'.
O onoj kampanji gde je potrebno rezervisati hotel i avion, sve to koristiti pa napisati recenziju i u konkurenciji si da dobijes par desetina usd kao nagradu, ne treba trositi reci.

Ovo sam vidio, pa ko normalan postavi takva plaćanja po kampanji. �ta da nekome prijavljujem tipfelere za 50 centi? Pa radije bi ga poslao negdje nego čitao njegovu stranicu i tra�io ih za tu lovu. Da ne spominjem da valjda svaki program u kojeg danas ubaci� tekst ima i nekakav autocorrect. A čak i ako nema, chat gpt to rije�i s jednim copy paste. Uopće ne znam kako nastane takva kampanja i kako netko misli da ne�to dobiva od toga.

Pa dovraga, za ovaj post ću dobit 5$ a nisam morao gledati stranicu projekta koji me uopće ne interesira.

�ta se tiče biranja managera, po meni manageri s lo�im trustom mogu jedino do posla ako oni kontaktiraju projekt i prodaju im priču. Ako netko �alje PM vi�e managera ipak je napravio minimalni reserch pa vjerojatno i vidi razliku. Ili će barem poslu�ati savjet nekog drugog.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 11:07:08 AM

Quote from: iqbal26 on Today at 10:58:21 AM

There is no anonymity involved here. Escrow0 operates under PT Digital Smart Service, which is a legally registered company in Indonesia with an official Business Identification Number / NIB.

How exactly is someone from the EU, from Poland, for example, protected? All trade and agreements are conducted via Telegram, right?
Do you issue any contracts or anything legally binding?

btw. Can you share legal documents and links where we can check your claim?

Most of our community is from Asia and Indonesia. Even though many of you are anonymous since we're building on Telegram, we still track transaction amounts and fees to make sure we're all set for tax requirements.

I have sent the DM, but I censored the email and tax ID

Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:34:30 AM

The irony in everything is that, considering that you are anonymous, without a built-up trust, you would have to deposit some money in the 'fourth' party escrow. Why would anyone trust you more than someone from a direct deal?

The fact that you have two negative feedback related to cheating further complicates the matter. So, you have a tendency to do that. How do you expect someone to entrust you with money for safekeeping.

There is no anonymity involved here. Escrow0 operates under PT Digital Smart Service, which is a legally registered company in Indonesia with an official Business Identification Number / NIB.

Quote from: qidafei on Today at 07:37:54 AM

Is anyone here? I want to know how long it usually takes to withdraw funds. I've been using this website for a long time, about a year, but I've never withdrawn any funds before. Today I deposited some money and won some in Baccarat. I tried to withdraw, but several hours have passed and my withdrawal order hasn't arrived. What happened? How long does it usually take to withdraw funds?

Answers from posts in the past.

Quote from: bitmover on February 09, 2025, 06:08:32 PM

Quote from: examplens on February 09, 2025, 05:28:25 PM

And yes, after the withdrawal request, I recognized the pending income transaction in my wallet almost immediately. I don't remember seeing such a fast withdrawal at any casino.

I agree, my Withdrawal was very fast too.

I had problems at first , but once it worked my withdrawal was completed in very few seconds.

But I think they should improve their error messages, because just a 406 error means nothing to me..

If your withdrawal request has issues, you can contact their support for help.

Round 14 is now over, here are the results :

Closing price on 15/04/2026 : 74 834$

Name	Prediction	Difference
xLays	75 067,00	233,00
ESG	72 088,08	2 745,92
cryptofrka	72 000,00	2 834,00
LoyceV	71 641,62	3 192,38
Pmalek	71 248,00	3 586,00
Hypnotizer	71 199,50	3 634,50
Leahized	70 998,00	3 836,00
Doan9269	70 550,00	4 284,00
promise444c5	70 325,00	4 509,00

Sorry, xLays, you sold your soul by joining this game, you can't just leave it that easily. To help you get back into the game, here's 50BTC for taking the first place.

I thought this round was going to be brutal, but not this bad.
Examplens, by not participating in this round, you lose a life.
Sorry, promise444c5 and Doan9269, this round is fatal for you. You have lost your last lives, so you are out of the game. It�s not your fault, blame LoyceV for failing to protect you.

For round 15, it's the same old story. Try to survive.

Round 15 : The Bloody round strikes back
What will be the price of Bitcoin at April 21, 2026, 12:00:00 AM (BTC closing price on 20/04/2026) ?
Submit your predictions before April 18, 2026, 06:00:00 PM.

Cash shop: OPEN

Special rules :
The two players with the worst predictions will lose a life.
LoyceV has to protect someone.

Sorry to interrupt, just thought I'd try clarify the following off topic misinformation. I forgot how people write shit here without a source and hope others will believe it Roll Eyes

Quote from: Xiestar on April 14, 2026, 12:51:18 AM

There�s a case about user Wiwo cheating on altcoinstalk but ignored since fellow local member defending the user.

Nope, it wasn't ignored there were 2 Judges and myself who reviewed the case and it was closed due to lack of evidence, hoods were peaked under etc.
They were defended by LuckyDigger and examplens over there, neither of which are active in Nigerian section.

Quote from: hugeblack on April 14, 2026, 06:45:34 AM

Can you add a link to this topic?

Since no-one appeared to be able to find it this is the original topic over there that was quoted over here.
As Karl_3000 said, no user was red tagged regarding this.

Quote from: Xiestar on April 14, 2026, 12:33:00 PM

Lmao, You�re exactly one of them. Are you kidding me.

I guess I must be part of the grand conspiracy as well.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 10:36:49 AM

Quote from: tomboi on April 14, 2026, 09:28:55 PM

Quote from: hugeblack on April 14, 2026, 09:43:55 AM

Was this account purchased? Huh

You haven't been active since 2019, so can you sign a message from this address?

Thank you for raising the concern.

I understand why this question may come up, and I respect the caution of forum members when reviewing a new service thread. That said, I would prefer not to turn this topic into a discussion of private or historical account matters.

I believe it is more useful and fair for the thread to stay focused on the service itself, how we operate, and what public guarantees we are prepared to provide.

I think what hugeblack asked is completely understandable and not a deviation from the topic. An honest answer to this is part of the discussion process about your "service itself, how we operate,". Only a direct and honest answer can close the discussion on this.
Now you are focused on building trust, and in the near future, the previous owner of the account may show up, or someone may accuse you of anything related to your account in the past.
All your efforts may become worthless because you have not cleared up the unclear history today.

I understand the concern, and I�ll clarify this directly.

Yes, I am the current owner of this account.

The reason I chose to use an existing account was mainly practical � to be able to properly present the service (including signature and formatting), since new accounts have strict limitations in that regard.

At the same time, I fully understand that account history alone should not be used as a basis for trust, especially in the context of a service like this.

That�s exactly why I am not relying on the account itself for credibility and instead focusing on verifiable guarantees:
� $10,000 escrow has been publicly deposited and confirmed
� the service is actively maintained and improved
� we are working on increasing transparency (guarantee letter, clearer terms, etc.)

I agree that trust should come from actions, not from account age or rank, and I�m prepared to build that trust over time through consistent operation.

I�m open to any service-related questions.

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 07:55:17 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on April 14, 2026, 03:29:11 PM

Ali nije nikom obećana ta maksimalna isplata. Napisano je da svaki učesnik, Sr. Member i vi�i rangovi, mogu zaraditi od $1.2 do $5 po postu. A zatim pi�e da će svaki primljeni učesnik dobiti PM sa predlo�enom isplatom po napisanom postu. Vjerovatno se tih $5 po postu čuva za sami creme de la creme ovog forumu po menad�erovom mi�ljenju. Vrlo spretno se igra sa riječima ali se ne mo�e reči da je promijenio pravila. I ja sam bio primljen u kampanju sa prijedlogom isplate $4 po postu do 25 postova tjedno ali sam dan prije toga primljen u Earnbet i zato sam odbio.

Ma to da isplata $5 po postu nije nikome obećana je totalna glupost po meni. Tako je isto mogao napisati da je isplata $10 po postu ali da on odlučuje o tome tko će dobiti tu isplatu. Naravno, ne radi se o promjeni pravila nego o tome da velikim iznosima privlači korisnike da se prijave kako bi mogao napisati da za svaku kampanju ima na stotine prijavljenih.

Quote from: examplens on April 14, 2026, 06:30:33 PM

/snip

Pre 6-7 godina bi tu sevali red tagovi.

Pa upravo to mi je bilo čudno. Nitko nije niti riječi na forumu napisao o tome da je broj postova u tom jednom tjednu bio smanjen. OK, moguće stvarno da se potkrala gre�ka ali ne mogu vjerovati da nitko nije reagirao.

Čini mi se da bi bilo po�tenije da je jednostavno napisao da se po postu plaća toliko i toliko a da će on, po osobnoj prosudbi kvalitete postova svih sudionika kampanje, svakog tjedna odabrati 1 sudionika kampanje i nagraditi ga posebnom novčanim bonusom.
Ovako to izgleda kao neka mulja�a da izgleda da je kampanja bolje plaćena nego �to zapravo je.
A za�to se nitko ne buni? Pa s obzirom da je broj kampanja ograničen očito se nitko ne �eli zamjerati i većina je sretna da dobije to �to dobije.

Quote from: Pmalek on April 14, 2026, 03:29:11 PM

Quote from: examplens on April 14, 2026, 06:30:33 PM

/snip

Pre 6-7 godina bi tu sevali red tagovi.

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 10:17:45 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:05:04 AM

/snip

edit: @Trofo, izgleda da je ipak u pitanju greska: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5516469.msg66613936#msg66613936

Lijepo da je ispravio gre�ku. Moguće da mu je netko u Telegram grupi spomenuo da je krivo izbrojao postove.

Ali opet ostaje činjenica da nitko ne prima maksimalnu isplatu koja je obećana u prvom postu signature kampanje. To je isto u redu ako je pravilo za maksimalnu isplatu transparentno napisano među pravilima kampanje, a znamo da nije.

Komunicirali smo prije ispravka. Tako da na �alost �ta se mene tiče to je priseljeni ispravak, kada te netko ulovi u mutnum. A mislim i ja vodim kampanju pa neću nakon 50+ tjedana odjednom platiti 20% manje. Gre�ke se događaju ali takve mi je malo nevjerojatno. Kopira� tablicu od prija�njeg tjedna svaki put, tamo ti je zalokano 25 postova i mora� fizički promjeniti na 20.

At first I want to formally apologize to those whom I have gave neutral feedback, which is lovesmayfamilies and FinneysTrueVision, I acted this due to how I was emotionally unstable and drained. It is shocking to see that such a thing just came up and I was also surprised they way everything where happening, after some thought I noticed that I was too biased on my judgement by misusing the trust system which I shouldn't. Although, there is no one which this would happened to they would be happy for the allegation which knowing too well that I have never involved in merit abuse.

It was heart broken, in fact it was @examplens comment which gave me the courage to come out to speak as being silent could be that bad. I am a merit source and I distribute merit accordingly and to how I found any profile worthy of meriting. I could remembered a topic like that, where people talks about how merit should be distributed. Many people said lot of things about what actually attracted them to distribute merit which everyone has their own ways of reviewing and analyzing profiles. However, I am saying that I do not abuse merits and even theymos already explained everything in pm on the day he made me source, hence I can't compromise with his words and I sticked to his directives how it should be..

Therefore, apologize to everyone here, that if I have misused or abused the trust system, I deem it necessary to say that I am very sorry for the way I have used the trust system and feedback. Hence, I have reversed my feedback from both two, which is FinneysTrueVision and lovesmayfamilies.

To Everyone who has showed interest on this case, I also in one way apologize to you all including yahoo62278, and hugeblack for the misused of the Trust system.

Thank you

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:05:04 AM

/snip

edit: @Trofo, izgleda da je ipak u pitanju greska: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5516469.msg66613936#msg66613936

Here are your predictions for Round 14 :

Name	Prediction
promise444c5	70 325,00
Doan9269	70 550,00
Leahized	70 998,00
Hypnotizer	71 199,50
Pmalek	71 248,00
LoyceV	71 641,62
cryptofrka	72 000,00
ESG	72 088,08
xLays	75 067,00
examplens	DNP

And the user protected by LoyceV is... oh, that's so cute... you helped me, so I'm protecting you... So the lucky one is Hypnotizer.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:51:48 AM

Dude, the domain is only 5 days old, how do you expect to be listed right away with some other reputable services that have been proven and have been operating for a long time. It is necessary for your service to be operational for a while, for real people who have used your service to appear and give feedback.

[/quote]

More than fair, we just responded about the Monerica comment. Witch is false and the admin acts like a tyrant instead of trying to solve the issues he has with us. Monerica has many scams listed as admitted, however we got a label for absolute no reason. If you would read the email chain with him, you will be socked how he responds.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:13:47 AM

[...]
Looking at it from the point of view of purpose, although I'm not too much of a fan of such changes, switching to USDS is not a bad choice in this case. Somehow, everyone accepted that the ticker USD"something" is reserved for stable coins and as such it more directly explains the purpose of the token. I noticed that a lot of users don't even know about DAI as an alternative to the most popular stablecoins.

I second this.

The renaming of DAI to USDS as part of the transition from MakerDAO to Sky (as part of the Endgame plan) was imo a smart strategic move. USDS introduced powerful new incentives like the Sky Savings Rate for passive returns and SKY token rewards for holders ... The upgrade also added a lock-up feature for enhanced security (e.g., in the event of errors). So this move is far more than a simple rebranding!

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:07:07 AM

Quote from: haircombint on April 09, 2026, 01:26:03 PM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 09, 2026, 01:09:39 PM

You didn't win any battle, cause otherwise you would already be silent.

What kind of piss-poor logic is that? A victor has to be silent? By that reasoning, the betpanda shills lost the battle too, as evidenced by your reply. But fuck that. To the victor, belongs the glory.

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 09, 2026, 01:09:39 PM

And the reason for people removing Betpanda's signature is that the campaign ended and everybody was released from their partnership. Roll Eyes

And like the pests they are, they scurried away from their master without looking back. Absolutely zero loyalty. Men without country.

Luckily for you, this forum has enough privacy, so you can openly write your nonsense, without anyone saying to your face, "hey man, you're embarrassing yourself, just stop".
I know, to you trolls, it's pretty irrelevant, but man, take care of yourself

This is the bitcointalk forums. Why would I feel threatened to say these things to bitcointalk users' face? The things I am saying are not lies and Bitcoiners are scrawny nerds.

Quote from: examplens on Today at 07:13:47 AM

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 06:11:50 AM

I don't like using rebranded coins because it is just too easy to keep using the old contract address by mistake unless the wallet is good enough to automatically show the new token and hide the old one.

I guess the best example where this was handled cleanly was when Polygon automatically migrated the MATIC tokens to POL tokens, but I barely noticed that change at all.

If there's going to be 'old DAI' and 'new DAI', perhaps it will be too confusing for people to understand.

If I understood correctly, there was a change of ownership in the company behind DAI even earlier, and this has been planned for a long time.

Looking at it from the point of view of purpose, although I'm not too much of a fan of such changes, switching to USDS is not a bad choice in this case. Somehow, everyone accepted that the ticker USD"something" is reserved for stable coins and as such it more directly explains the purpose of the token. I noticed that a lot of users don't even know about DAI as an alternative to the most popular stablecoins.

USDS is now as unsafe as USDC, I don't know why I should use it if I have USDC

Code:

DAI and "New DAI" (USDS)
Classic DAI: Is an immutable smart contract. Its code does not contain blacklisting or the ability to freeze funds by MakerDAO. It is considered more censorship-resistant.
New USDS (formerly NewStable): In August 2024, the MakerDAO protocol rebranded as Sky and introduced the USDS token. Unlike the old DAI, USDS adds a[b] freeze function[/b] to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Migrating from DAI to USDS is voluntary.

Quote from: examplens on April 07, 2026, 01:46:01 PM

Today, I noticed that the current rebranding of the DAI token is the new USDS. It was announced earlier https://forum.skyeco.com/t/sky-has-arrived/24959 but it's actually happening right now on Binance. Deposit and withdrawal of DAI are suspended, 1:1 conversion will be automatic.
Binance announcement: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/df2ce9c43b1d406ca2c4b14e4e34610a
As they announced this, or maybe it is already in the process with other major CEX, it would probably be recommended for b1exch to adapt to this change and include USDS in their listing.
It will still be possible to convert DAI to USDS on Sky, but it is an extra step for those who want to send their tokens to a third service.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (57) 14368 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 308 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (14) 9516 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2606 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4897 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 10706 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2743 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 3408 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2622 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9505 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (1) 8604 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1955 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1927 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +15 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6189 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2459 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2078 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 158444: hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 480 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (11) 6531 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1879 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 757 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2902 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6119 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 6676 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 6703 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 314792: examplens (Trust: +8 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (26) 3568 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 9734 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 713 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +38 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (23) 4279 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 3619 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 11695 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2662 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 407174: klarki (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 4427 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (61) 20520 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +31 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (30) 6317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3023 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 9504 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1363 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 4001 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 450 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1488 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3700 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1149 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3435 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6641 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +94 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 4162 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 1887 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2232 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 4439 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15309 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2213 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +82 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (36) 12156 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1171 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1379 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2255 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2043 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 9623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2513 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3412 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 7372 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11289 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3193 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1416 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4010 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3362 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 20237 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2596 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2473 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +30 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 5625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +48 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 3479 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1889 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1270 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3946 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 828 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5512 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 7874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 9606 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1552 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 9628 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6287 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1242 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3324 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 647 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 7006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (8488 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (191 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3318: Luke-Jr (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)