Last update: 2026-01-25_Sun_18.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Crypto Library receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Crypto Library
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Crypto Library" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66334095 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 18:04:01 CET 2026) in Why Trump is a threat to world peace today.:
That's what I said, the two-faced policies of Western civilization are being revealed to the whole world, at least for Trump. When America-Israel creates unrest in the Middle East, they support it, whether it is ethical or unethical, but now that the gun is pointed at them, they have started to open their mouths.
Anyway, I would still say that in this time the European countries might not be do the same mistake they do during World War II that they go agianst the hitler lately but here we saw, But we can already see that Europe is able to somewhat restrain the Americans by exerting economic pressure, I think they will intensify these measures if Donald Trump doesn't turn his attention to Greenland.
Yeah, on this point I am in full agreement with you and this happens rarely with members of the Stake campaign -- most are completely braindead spammers that don't read anything. Maybe you are not like that, which would be a good thing.

Whether someone is going to behave in good or evil ways is entirely up to the person or entity. It is their decision and they have to live with the consequences that come as a result of said decision. However, what is worse than even being a honest evil actor is being a deceptive actor. Speaking in manipulative ways, being a hypocrite and everything that comes with this behavior is a representation of worst kind of people. If you are evil, man up and live it. Europe is a shithole and it deserves everything that is going to happen to it, and so do other allies, for their hypocritical behavior. This was known and clear to those that pay attention, but Trump merely exaggerated the process of exposing hypocrisy. To make this even ridiculous, Trump is very old and obviously he is not able to act in his prime -- he will make all sorts of mistakes, and yet he has been able to do this and play most Europeans like a fiddle. How many times they got upset since he got into office, we could make a reality show off of it.

Trump turns a threat to some countries because they cannot compete with how powerful Trump is. So instead of liking and appreciating him, these countries have seen him as a threat and might as well planning some silent attacks.
But personally, Trump is just trying to lead his country on what he thinks he's right. And if he sees his country is being taken advantage of, he will not let it pass but will sanction those will try to do so.
He is not a threat to a world peace, but the reactions he get from other leaders are definitely the threat to peace. And Trump is highly aware of that.
Yes, but you kind of got this wrong and backwards. Countries that are weak and small have been mostly ungrateful parasites towards the USA. Instead of obeying and doing what needs to be done for our side, they have been ungrateful and causing unnecessary problems for the US. This is why Trump does not like them at all. Look at the recent statements about NATO, he claimed accurately that mostly other countries NATO soldiers stayed back out of the action -- some countries got upset because a few of their soldiers died. What a joke,
besides the UK and Canada the other countries had fewer than 100 deaths and this is what they consider their great contribution. Fuck these countries, the US should withdraw from NATO and let them fend for themselves. The US can defend itself and even invade others, the other NATO countries without the US are useless. Enough ingratitude, let them reap the consequences of their own stupidity.
2. Post 66333685 (unedited backup) (by Doll2233) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 15:49:08 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
In fact, with the T20 World Cup just around the corner, England are being tested by their ODI performance against Sri Lanka, where we thought they would win without any competition. But today, England are facing a do or die match to win the series.
Anyway, Sri Lanka have opted to bat after today's toss. Now let's see how England's bowling performance is today. I hope they will try to restrict Sri Lanka to around 250 runs today and secure an easy win.
English team doing well in second ODI, in 34 overs SL score is 148 and four wickets have gone down. Kusal Mendis who remained not out on 93 in first ODI was out after scoring 26 runs. English bowlers will try there best to not allow SL batters to make it to 250 today. Still 16 overs left in SL innings and if SL want to remain in the game then they must try to score 100 runs in remaining 16 overs. It's a must win game for English team as they have lost the first ODI and if they lose today the series will be over for them.
By playing first Sri Lanka team scored 219 in ODI format. It was not good total for chasing because recently India scored 200 plus in T20 format so they should scored more runs such as 270 plus then it considered good runs. The highest run from the Sri Lanka team was 45 which was scored by Charith Asalanka he played with 70.30 strike rate and it is not good strike rate. If we talk about partnership building then only one partnership they built which was 66 runs in 93 balls but this was not good partnership because in which many balls beated.
On the other hand NZ team bowled well but in batting line they played slow because the total was not tough for chasing they should chase total in 30 to 35 overs. In batting side they built partnership of 81 runs in 126 balls. This was also too slow partnership as compared to Sri Lanka team. Anyways congratulations for winning the match.
3. Post 66332450 (unedited backup) (by As-Soon-As) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 05:50:02 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
As I actually expected, England's bowling performance was a bit better than I expected. Where I expected Sri Lanka to be all out for around 250 runs, they managed to bowl Sri Lanka out for just 219 runs.
And they managed to recover by winning the do or die match of this series today. However, the biggest credit today will go to Joe Root, who bowled just as well as he batted and took two catches in his excellent fielding. However, I think we will see this kind of performance from England in the next match as well and the Citizens will see them as the victors.
England team tried 9 different bowlers and that strategy worked for them. Sri Lankan team batting performance was not good today as it was in first ODI, the team got out in last over of their innings after scoring 219 runs. On same track, we saw England team struggled to chase 272 runs in first ODI but today target was just 220 runs and England team won the match quite easily. Joe Root took 2 wickets and also scored 75 runs with the bat, he was given man of the match award. Third ODI will be played on Jan 27, 2026 and that will decide result of the series.
England have recovered their form and responded well in the second ODI. England's bowling and batting lines have been able to attack from both sides, Root took two wickets and put an end to the Sri Lankan team. Root's good performance has levelled the ODI series by winning the match 1-1, but England's chances of winning the third match are looking more likely. Because they won the second match by a wide margin, I believe that England can be aggressive at any time and play a significant role in helping the team win.
4. Post 66332222 (unedited backup) (by noormcs5) (scraped on Sun Jan 25 01:03:49 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
In fact, with the T20 World Cup just around the corner, England are being tested by their ODI performance against Sri Lanka, where we thought they would win without any competition. But today, England are facing a do or die match to win the series.
Anyway, Sri Lanka have opted to bat after today's toss. Now let's see how England's bowling performance is today. I hope they will try to restrict Sri Lanka to around 250 runs today and secure an easy win.
England with the win in the second game and this is good to see making comeback in the tournament. Hopefully, England wins the next game and saves them from losing the series against Sri Lanka. It was very shameful for England that they accidentally lost the first game, but at the same time, if you think from a different perspective, it proves that Sri Lanka is slowly ranking up and making good progress.
Joe Root's wonderful innings helped the England team to score a victory, scoring 75 in 90 balls. Also Harry Brook made a good 42 runs and the batting from the England team in this match was top-notch.
5. Post 66331255 (unedited backup) (by WatChe) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 20:23:55 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
As I actually expected, England's bowling performance was a bit better than I expected. Where I expected Sri Lanka to be all out for around 250 runs, they managed to bowl Sri Lanka out for just 219 runs.
And they managed to recover by winning the do or die match of this series today. However, the biggest credit today will go to Joe Root, who bowled just as well as he batted and took two catches in his excellent fielding. However, I think we will see this kind of performance from England in the next match as well and the Citizens will see them as the victors.
England team tried 9 different bowlers and that strategy worked for them. Sri Lankan team batting performance was not good today as it was in first ODI, the team got out in last over of their innings after scoring 219 runs. On same track, we saw England team struggled to chase 272 runs in first ODI but today target was just 220 runs and England team won the match quite easily. Joe Root took 2 wickets and also scored 75 runs with the bat, he was given man of the match award. Third ODI will be played on Jan 27, 2026 and that will decide result of the series.
6. Post 66330811 (unedited backup) (by ZAINmalik75) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 18:12:20 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
In fact, with the T20 World Cup just around the corner, England are being tested by their ODI performance against Sri Lanka, where we thought they would win without any competition. But today, England are facing a do or die match to win the series.
Anyway, Sri Lanka have opted to bat after today's toss. Now let's see how England's bowling performance is today. I hope they will try to restrict Sri Lanka to around 250 runs today and secure an easy win.
Yeh that's victory really mean for English team as it's the only rare opportunity with them to avoid series defeat and get back into it to keep the things interesting, Sirilankan after toss opt bat and try to recreate the previous match situation, but English bowling lineup set trap led by spinners got successfully restricted Sirilankan below huge target. Although middle order of them and rest try to keep scoreboard blow up but early collapse keep them below mounting pressure. While from English side Crawley after few collapse got dropped and try Rehan Ahmad the tail under as a surprise entry in opening slot, later heroic innings from Root and well as brook and buttler finally get some positive results for team.
7. Post 66329871 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 12:52:38 CET 2026) in Why Trump is a threat to world peace today.:
All I know is, he is doing it all for his country, and I think it's not a bad kind of action. He is a patriot, and a lot of Americans do support him because of that.
Hitler, too, was a patriot, and everything he did was for his country.
The fact that a person is a patriot doesn't mean whatever he does for his country is the right thing. A person may want what is best for his country, but what he wants is not actually best for his country. The same person might be patriotic, but the way he carries out his actions may not be what is best for his country. In his own view, he is doing what is best.
Talking about a lot of Americans supporting him. There will always be people who will support a person as long as you can get them to love you, and support you as long as you say what they want to hear. People still support Kim Jong-un in North Korea. People support Ali Khamenei in Iran, and people supported and died for Hitler.
The point is, the fact that a person has a lot of supporters doesn't mean he is right.
Nobody has claimed this, and what you are using as an argumentation line here is correct -- but it is entirely useless. It can be used for anything and everything. If the politician is a not patriot, it does not mean whatever he does for his country is the wrong/right thing. If the politician is a patriot/republican/democrat it does not mean whatever he does for his country is the right thing. These generic counter-arguments are pointless, as they are missing the point. When looking at it from a complete perspective, any politician that is a patriot is better than a politician who is not -- those who aren't, shouldn't even be allowed to serve the public office and should be executed as traitor. The government of a country has one primary duty, and that is its duty to the citizens in accordance with the constitutions and all laws that derive from that. Any politician that puts other people first, such as immigrants or worse, illegals, is a malicious individual -- no amount of virtue signalling will change that. You have many such corrupt example, such as that deranged Ilhan Omar in the US.
If things continue this way, and they don't get resolve with sanity -- then extreme measures must be applied. A constitutional amendment that requires a prioritization of its own citizens, and everything else is punishable by speedy execution. That should be the starting trick. If you look at the EU, most of the leading parties and politicians are working against the native population of that continent. It seems to me, that not being patriotic, tends to be much more correlated with doing things that are not right for the country.

Trump has a positive role, which is that he has shown that there are no "rules" (and there never were). Now it should be clear to any leader of any country what to focus on in foreign policy - only on strength. Because Trump will take away more and more of the conditional "Greenlands" over time, even from his "allies."
Well said, Trump has a positive role, and that is, he is exposing the double-standard character of modern imperialism.
Europe has always supported the imperialist character of America, but they have not been attacked so far. Now, when America has its eyes on Greenland i.e. Donald Trump has its eyes on it, they themselves are calling Donald Trump a threat to world peace.
They don't mind it if he does it to someone who they don't like as long as it is not them. If it involves them, then suddenly there is an issue. This is the classic hypocrisy of the idiots that run most European countries. They do deserve to lose their sovereignty and a dose of freedom. That would, however, have a very negative impact on the markets.

8. Post 66329792 (unedited backup) (by MusaPk) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 12:19:25 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
In fact, with the T20 World Cup just around the corner, England are being tested by their ODI performance against Sri Lanka, where we thought they would win without any competition. But today, England are facing a do or die match to win the series.
Anyway, Sri Lanka have opted to bat after today's toss. Now let's see how England's bowling performance is today. I hope they will try to restrict Sri Lanka to around 250 runs today and secure an easy win.
English team doing well in second ODI, in 34 overs SL score is 148 and four wickets have gone down. Kusal Mendis who remained not out on 93 in first ODI was out after scoring 26 runs. English bowlers will try there best to not allow SL batters to make it to 250 today. Still 16 overs left in SL innings and if SL want to remain in the game then they must try to score 100 runs in remaining 16 overs. It's a must win game for English team as they have lost the first ODI and if they lose today the series will be over for them.
9. Post 66329308 (unedited backup) (by noormcs5) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 08:26:31 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
I will say here that England could not start their batting well in this match they were performing poorly from the start, I am actually talking about their run rate, where the Sri Lankan team's run rate was above six and around five, while the England team's run rate was seen at four and below.
Which basically forced the batsmen to score later, and what actually happens is that the batsmen try to hit long shots and are more likely to get out by mistake. This mainly happened in the case of middle-order batsmen to lower order batsmen. As a result England team had to lose to a weak team like Sri Lanka team
Yeah, England lost to a weaker team Sri Lanka in the first ODI but that was one of that match where we had an upset. I don't think England will let Sri Lanka win today and let the series go away from their hand. This makes today's match very important as it is a do or die for the England team if they are not to lose the series.
From Sri Lanka point of view, they have a golden opportunity to win the series by winning today game. Last time it was 2014 when Sri Lanka won the ODI series against England and it was a 5-2 win in a seven match contest but that was when Sri Lanka has players like Kumar Sangakkara and Angelo Mathews.
10. Post 66329239 (unedited backup) (by laspol65) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 07:44:07 CET 2026) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
Actually, when India started their batting, I checked the score and after seeing their first two wickets fall, I thought that India might be going in the same direction as in the ODI series, that is, they will lose to New Zealand in the second match.
But Kishan and Suryakumar, with their completely responsible batting performance, lifted the Indian team out of that pressure and put pressure on the New Zealand team. And later, Ishan Kishan was out for 76 runs, but Shivam Dube filled his positon by taking 36 runs from 18 balls.
Exactly I also just thought like you. But India has changed the direction. Their every player is the match winner. When Abhishek Sharma got out on the first ball I was thinking that it has made much of pressure on India but Ishan Kishan and Suryakumar Yadav made a great partnership. The way they were playing they could easily chase 250+ runs target too. That was great and exciting match and with this winning India has won the series too. Congratulations to India.
5 T20 matches will be played between India and New Zealand, where India has already won two matches, but is not yet sure of winning the series. However, India is very good in the T20 format, and every player is capable of winning at any time. In this match, when Abhishek Sharma and Samson got out early in the game, many people in the Indian team were under pressure. But Ishan Kishan and Suraya Kumar Jadhav played the biggest role in ensuring the victory of India.
11. Post 66328842 (unedited backup) (by ThemePen) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 01:20:02 CET 2026) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
Actually, when India started their batting, I checked the score and after seeing their first two wickets fall, I thought that India might be going in the same direction as in the ODI series, that is, they will lose to New Zealand in the second match.
But Kishan and Suryakumar, with their completely responsible batting performance, lifted the Indian team out of that pressure and put pressure on the New Zealand team. And later, Ishan Kishan was out for 76 runs, but Shivam Dube filled his positon by taking 36 runs from 18 balls.
Exactly I also just thought like you. But India has changed the direction. Their every player is the match winner. When Abhishek Sharma got out on the first ball I was thinking that it has made much of pressure on India but Ishan Kishan and Suryakumar Yadav made a great partnership. The way they were playing they could easily chase 250+ runs target too. That was great and exciting match and with this winning India has won the series too. Congratulations to India.
12. Post 66328822 (unedited backup) (by Bd officer) (scraped on Sat Jan 24 01:05:20 CET 2026) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
আজকের বিপিএল খেলা দেখেছেন নাকি? তানজিদ তামিম এর ইনিংস টা সত্যি দেখার মতো ছিলো। এই বিপিএল জুরে কিছু প্লেয়ার এর দুর্দান্ত উন্নতি হয়েছে বলা চলে।
তানজিদ তামিম ফাইনালে ভালো করেছে, এটা ২য় বাংলাদেশী হিসেবে ফাইনাল ম্যাচে সেঞ্চুরি করেছেন, আর বিপিএল ইতিহাসে বাংলাদেশীদের মধ্যে সর্বোচ্চ সেঞ্চুরি করেছেন, তার সেঞ্চুরি ৩ টা হয়েছে। হ্যাঁ, কিছু খেলোয়াড়ের উন্নতি হয়েছে, নাজমুল শান্ত যাকে লর্ড শান্ত বলা হতো তিনি এবার ভালো করেছে। পারভেস ইমন তিনিও ভালো করেছেন সর্বোচ্চ স্কোরার ছিলো, কিন্তু টি-২০ বিশ্বকাপে যাকে ভাইস ক্যাপ্টেন করা হয়েছিলো তার পারফরম্যান্স দেখেছেন? সাইফ হাসান নিজ্রক্র হারিয়ে ফেলেছে, ভাগ্যিস বাংলাদেশের ওয়াল্ড কাপ অনিশ্চিত রয়েছে না হলে এদের দিয়ে কিছুই হতো না, শুধু বকাবকি করা লাগতো।
আমার মতে বাংলাদেশ এর ইন্ডিয়া তে খেলতে না যাওয়াই বেটার। যেখানে খেলা হোস্ট হলে বাংলাদেশের কোনো সাপোর্টার এ যেতে পারবেনা তার উপর নিরাপত্তার ঝুকি, এতকিছুর জন্য স্কিপ করাই বেটার। পাকিস্তান কিন্তু ভারতের মাটি তে ক্রিকেট খেলে না শুধু এই ইস্যুর জন্যই। বাংলাদেশের জন্যও যদি এমন হয়, ভবিষ্যতে আমাদের আলাদা ভেন্যু দিতে হবে৷ হয়তো এইবার এর ডিসিশন টা শেষ সময়ে নেয়া হয়েছে দেখে কিছু করার নেই, তবুও নিজেদের স্ট্যান্ড থেকে না সরে আসার জন্য আমি সাধুবাদ জানাই।
শুধু পাকিস্তান ভারতের মাটিতে না বরং ইন্ডিয়াও পাকিস্তানের মাটিতে শুধুমাত্র এই একই নিরাপত্তা ইস্যু দেখিয়ে খেলতে যায় না এক্ষেত্রে যদি আমি আমার পার্সোনাল ওপিনিয়ন প্রকাশ করি তাহলে সিকিউরিটির দিক থেকে ইন্ডিয়ার চাইতে ১০০ গুন বেটার পাকিস্তান এটা শুধু আমরা বাংলাদেশী না ইন্ডিয়ানদের জন্যও।
যাই হোক তবে এখানে যদি আমরা দেখি আইসিসি স্টেটমেন্ট দিচ্ছে যে এইখানে তারা তাদের নিয়ম অনুযায়ী টুর্নামেন্ট চলমান রাখবে কোনো বিশেষ দলের জন্য এক্সট্রা প্রিভিলেজ ফেভার করা হবে না, কিন্তু এই বিষয়টা পাকিস্তান এবং ইন্ডিয়ার ক্ষেত্রে কেন প্রয়োগ করা হয় না এইটা আমার প্রশ্ন?
শুরুতে শুরুতে তো পাকিস্তানের ম্যাচ গুলোও ইন্ডিয়াতে ফোর্স করে ফেলানো হত পরবর্তীতে পাকিস্তান বেঁকে বসলে তাদের অনুরোধকেউ মেনে নিয়ে নিউট্রাল একটা ভেনুতে ফেলানো হয়েছে।
ভাই আইসিসি চলে ইন্ডিয়ার কথায়, প্রায় আইসিসিতে কর্মরত কর্মকর্তার মধ্যে ৭০% ইন্ডিয়ার বলা যায়, তাহলে তো এখানে দাদারা দাদাগিরি দেখাবেই। আর বাংলাদেশ এখানে একটু দুর্বল যে তারা অনেক দেরিতে এমন সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছে, তাই আইসিসি নানান অযুহাত দেখাতে পারছে। তবুও যদি ভারত পাকিস্তানের ক্ষেত্রে নিরপেক্ষ ভেনুতে ম্যাচ আয়োজন করা হয় তাহলে বাংলাদেশের ক্ষেত্রে তাদের দাবি মানবে না কেন? এটা আমাদের সবার প্রশ্ন। আর নিউজে শুনলাম এই ইস্যু নিয়ে BCB আন্তর্জাতিক ক্রিয়া আদালতে মামলা করতে পারে, এছাড়া তো উপায় নেই।
একটা দলের কত স্বপ্ন থাকে ওয়াল্ড কাপ খেলবে, যেখানে আমরা সুযোগ পেয়েও সুযোগ হাতছাড়া হওয়ার মতো অবস্থা হয়েছে। বাংলাদেশের পরিবর্তে অন্য দল নেওয়ার পরিকল্পনাও করা হয়েছে। যদি এই ঘটনা ইন্ডিয়ার সাথে হতো তাহলে এতদিনে টুর্নামেন্ট পিছিয়ে দিতো, আমরা জানি ক্ষমতা চিরকাল থাকে না অবশ্যই কোন সময় ভারতের আইসিসিতে এতটা প্রভাব থাকবে না।
যাইহোক রাজশাহী দল জিতবে এটা আগে থেকে অনুমান করতে পেরেছিলাম তাদের দেশীয় এবং বিদেশিও উভয় প্লেয়ার গুলোই শক্তিশালী প্লেয়ার বোলারের দিক থেকে পুরো টুর্নামেন্ট জুড়ে বিনুরা ফার্নান্দ অসাধারণ পারফরমেন্স করেছে লাস্ট ম্যাচে এসেও বোলিং এর ক্ষেত্রে মাত্র নয় রান দিয়ে চারটি উইকেট পেয়েছে
এবারের ফাইনাল নিয়ে আমি এতটা সন্তুষ্ট নই, যদি সিলেট ফাইনালে উঠতে পারত তাহলে খুশি হতাম। বিনুরা শেষ দুই ম্যাচে জয়ের নায়ক ছিলো, আর নিউজ শুনলাম কেউ কি জানেন? বিপিএল এ ফিক্সিং এর অভিযোগ করা হয়েছে। যাইহোক, রাজশাহীকে অভিনন্দন।
13. Post 66328477 (unedited backup) (by Y3shot) (scraped on Fri Jan 23 23:19:19 CET 2026) in Do you people with hard luck quit gambling?:
And at the moment, I would also say that in the case of gambling, we should always keep the staking amount or the gambling bankroll small, so that even if we lose that amount, it does not have a big impact on us. Even if we are unlucky in this case, we can at least console ourselves with the fact that our amount is within our ability to lose.
I follow the rules in my own case, because I am also an unlucky person, so I also face losses most of the time when I gamble, but I take these measures to prevent that.
In gambling you can avoid the loses, it will definitely take place. Even as gambling has an outcome of win and lose some people believe that they can never lose in gambling and because of this mentality, many with this mindset dont have any plan for bankroll, they just stake with the amount they have just believing that they can succeed in winning. In gambling lose even occurs more, and this is suppose to be a lesson their is no way one will be able to escape gambling loses.
14. Post 66327698 (unedited backup) (by Mahiyammahi) (scraped on Fri Jan 23 19:58:55 CET 2026) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
হ্যাঁ প্লেয়াররা সুরক্ষিত থাকবে তবে এখানে বিনোদন যে জিনিসটার জন্য ক্রিকেট খেলা সেটারই কিছু থাকবে না সবাই সব সময় ভয়ে ভয়ে গিয়ে খেলা দেখতে যাবে। তাই বাংলাদেশ ক্রিকেট বোর্ড এর ডিসিশনকে আমি স্বাগতম জানাই সেই সাথে সাথে এ ডিসিশনটা গৌরবের যদি এমন হতো বাংলাদেশ ডিসিশন চেঞ্জ করে এখন ভারতে খেলতে যাচ্ছে তাহলে পুরোটাই একেবারে নাকে খদ দেওয়ার মতন হয়ে যেত।
আমার মতে বাংলাদেশ এর ইন্ডিয়া তে খেলতে না যাওয়াই বেটার। যেখানে খেলা হোস্ট হলে বাংলাদেশের কোনো সাপোর্টার এ যেতে পারবেনা তার উপর নিরাপত্তার ঝুকি, এতকিছুর জন্য স্কিপ করাই বেটার। পাকিস্তান কিন্তু ভারতের মাটি তে ক্রিকেট খেলে না শুধু এই ইস্যুর জন্যই। বাংলাদেশের জন্যও যদি এমন হয়, ভবিষ্যতে আমাদের আলাদা ভেন্যু দিতে হবে৷ হয়তো এইবার এর ডিসিশন টা শেষ সময়ে নেয়া হয়েছে দেখে কিছু করার নেই, তবুও নিজেদের স্ট্যান্ড থেকে না সরে আসার জন্য আমি সাধুবাদ জানাই।
আজকের বিপিএল খেলা দেখেছেন নাকি? তানজিদ তামিম এর ইনিংস টা সত্যি দেখার মতো ছিলো। এই বিপিএল জুরে কিছু প্লেয়ার এর দুর্দান্ত উন্নতি হয়েছে বলা চলে।
15. Post 66326095 (unedited backup) (by Doll2233) (scraped on Fri Jan 23 13:06:13 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
Tomorrow Pakistan U19s team will play game against Zimbabwe U19s team and lets see who will win this game. England U19s vs Scotland U19s game, Scotland U19s team won toss and they got chance to choose bat and fielding lineup first and they selected field first. England U19s from Group C is one of strong and they won all 3 games and in past, they beated Pakistan U19s team. England U19s batsmen set big target 404 runs in 50 overs by losing 6 wickets. Joseph and Ben batsmen helped a lot team to win this game and Joseph scored 81 runs in 65 balls and hitted five 4s and four 6s. Ben made brilliant century 191 runs in 117 balls and hitted eighteen 4s and eight 6s. Scotland U19s also played very poor game against Pakistan U19s team and today they failed to win this game and they chased down 152 runs and lost game by 252 runs. Caleb also helped team in bowling side and took down 3 wickets in 4.5 overs and gave 19 runs.
It seems that making a prediction here will not be too difficult because Pakistan U-19 team is a stronger team than Zimbabwe U-19 team. It is not only in batting but in both batting and bowling, Pakistan U-19 team is doing much better than Zimbabwe U-19 team and besides, in most of the matches that have been played against Zimbabwe U-19 team, Pakistan U-19 team has been seen to have a very terrible batting performance and in terms of bowling too, we have seen in the ODI series that Zimbabwe U-19 team was all out for just 158 runs.
So I can believe with a lot of certainty that Pakistan U-19 team is going to beat Zimbabwe U-19 team in this match.
Zimbabwe Under-19s today showed very poor performance. Too much batting today they played. Only one player could make well runs, remaining other players gave back to back wickets. They scored just 128 runs in 35.5. No partnership no performance very disappointed batting by Zimbabwe team. But credit goes to Pakistani bowlers they bowled very well today. Ali Raza bowled very good as he bowled before. He gave 16 run and took 3 wickets in 8 overs only. Also Abdul shuban contribution was well, he gave 14 runs in 7 overs and got 2 wickets.
On the other hand Pakistan team runs chased in 26.2 overs in the loss of 2 wickets. Sameer Minhas played great inning he scored 74 runs in which 3 sixes and 6 fours included, and he stayed on the crease till end. Anyways congratulations to the Pakistan team for a great victory.
16. Post 66324647 (unedited backup) (by Bd officer) (scraped on Fri Jan 23 00:07:43 CET 2026) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
বাংলাদেশের ক্রিকেট নিয়ে আপনাদের কার কি মতামত? এখানে তো দেখি এটা নিয়ে কোন আলাপ-আলোচনাই হচ্ছে না?
।
ভাই ক্রিকেট নিয়ে আমি পোস্ট দিয়েছিলাম। যাইহোক নিউজে দেখলাম আইসিসি তে বাংলাদেশের ভেনু চেঞ্জ নিয়ে ভোটাভোটি হয়েছিলো সম্ভবত ১৪ টা মধ্যে বাংলাদেশ ২ টা ভোট পেয়েছিলো, যার কারণে বাংলাদেশের ভেনু চেঞ্জ করার আবেদন বাতিল করা হয়েছিলো এবং বাংলাদেশকে বিশ্বকাপ খেলতে হলে ভারতে যাওয়ার কথা বলা হয়েছিলো। তবে সম্ভবত বাংলাদেশকে ২৪ ঘন্টা সময় দেওয়া হয়েছিলো এবং বাংলাদেশ ক্রিকেট বোর্ড খেলোয়াড়দের নিয়ে মিটিং করেছিলো এবং বাংলাদেশ ভারতে যেতে ইচ্ছুক নয়। এখানে আমার মতামত ভারতে যাওয়া উচিত নয়, ভারতে কোন নিরাপত্তা নেই, বাংলাদেশী কোন দর্শক খেলা দেখতে গেলে সেখানেই হামলা করতে পারে এবং খেলোয়াড়দের নিরাপত্তার গ্যারান্টি নেই, গোমুত্র খোররা হামলা করবে না এর কোন গ্যারান্টি নেই।
তবে অবশ্যই যদি বাংলাদেশ বিশ্বকাপে অংশগ্রহণ না করে তাহলে ক্রিকেটের ক্ষতি হয়ে যাবে, টি-২০ তে ২১ নাম্বার দল হয়ে যাবে, যার ফলে পরবর্তী টি-২০ বিশ্বকাপ খেলতে হলে বাছাই পর্ব খেলতে হবে, এখানেই ক্ষতি হবে। আর আপনি ঠিকই বলেছেন, বাংগালীরা আজ পর্যন্ত কোন চায়ের কাপ আনতে পারে নাই, ক্ষতি হলেই বা কী?
যাইহোক, আমার প্রশ্ন যদি পাকিস্তানের ভেনু চেঞ্জ করে দিতে পারে তাহলে আইসিসি বাংলাদেশের ক্ষেত্রে কেন এমন সিদ্ধান্ত নিলো? নাকী পাকিস্তানে পারমাণবিক অস্ত্র রয়েছে, ঝানেলা বাধাতে পারে এর জন্য নাকী? তারা জানে বাংলাদেশকে বাদ দিলে কিছুই হবে না? আসলে আইসিসির উচিত ছিলো বাংলাদেশের ভেনু পরিবর্তন করা।
17. Post 66324042 (unedited backup) (by Joy_learns_crypto) (scraped on Thu Jan 22 21:09:01 CET 2026) in Crypto or stocks investment which is do you prefer?:
I am not very experienced in the stock market and I am not very interested in investing in it.
However, on the other hand, if I mean Bitcoin by crypto, then I am aware of its market and I know that Bitcoin has no competitors. At the same time, the maximum supply of Bitcoin is only 21 million, which is allocated for unlimited peoples, instead of unlimited I could say 8 billion but the human population is not stopping, it is increasing over time.
So the demand for Bitcoin will definitely be higher in the future, so I will choose Bitcoin as my investment, especially in the long term. If we invest in Bitcoin, it is possible to earn more than double the profit from here, even though the guarantee is minimal.
The demand for stocks will definitely go up and with companies like Nvidia and other that could just spring out the demand for stocks will definitely increase very rapidly.
I don’t prefer stock to bitcoin because I will invest in bitcoin but someone could invest in Nvidia and do better than me. And in stock there are many companies you can look at but in cryptocurrency the risk is higher when you spin away from bitcoin.
18. Post 66323870 (unedited backup) (by HelliumZ) (scraped on Thu Jan 22 20:13:55 CET 2026) in Bangladesh Premier League 2025 Discussion thread:
And if we count from the other side then in that number we will see that Rajshahi warriors team has won eight out of their ten matches and on the other hand Chittagong Royals has won six out of their ten matches and lost four matches yes it is true that Chittagong Royals has won twice against Rajshahi team on the other hand Rajshahi team has won only once against Chittagong but as a team strong performance has been coming from Rajshahi warriors throughout the tournament. So in this song I will put Rajshahi warriors slightly ahead of Chittagong Royals in terms of strength.
However, we won't be able to understand the ultimate result until the match is played on the field because both teams have reached this final match through their competitive performance.
Yes, it may be that Rajshahi's overall performance was not bad, but in the final match, some of Rajshahi's batsmen like Sahebzada Farhan, New Zealand's Kane Williamson, Bangladesh's Mushfiqur Rahim, James Nessham, all of them are quite aggressive and can change the pace of the match at any time. Rajshahi has the highest balance of foreign players, so Rajshahi is more likely to become the champion, but Chittagong has a very high domestic balance. So it is very difficult to predict which team will win the final match.
19. Post 66321531 (unedited backup) (by Bd officer) (scraped on Thu Jan 22 07:34:01 CET 2026) in Bangladesh Premier League 2025 Discussion thread:
Good effort from the Sylhet Titans, but Binura Fernando stood in their way as he alone took four wickets and gave away only 19 runs, which left Sylhet Titans behind in terms of scoring and this is where they could basically balance the required runrate and their current runrate and gradually fell behind and the result started towards the last and they lost to Rajshahi Warriors by just 12 runs.
Now tomorrow we will see Rajshahi Warriors in the final against Chattogram Royals. Which team do you think will win this match?
Yes, Sylhet's effort was not bad but it could not reach the target of victory. Here I can see the failure of some of Sylhet's batsmen. Ariful Islam wasted 6 balls and Zakir Hasan wasted 3 balls, if both of them had scored 9 runs in these 9 balls, then Sylhet would not have been under so much pressure towards the last. Also, was Mehidy Hasan Miraz perfect for playing T20? Both batting and bowling were not good. Mehidy Hasan Miraz batted at a strike rate below 100 in most of the matches. Yesterday he scored 9 runs in 13 balls, he should have scored at least 20 runs. When Emon got out, I thought Sylhet would not be able to win and in the end, that is what happened.
If you talk about the final match, then I think the final match can be competitive, because the top two teams in the points table have made it to the final. However, there were 3 matches between these two teams where Chattogram Royals won two matches. Now I want to put Rajshahi ahead in the final match.
20. Post 66321359 (unedited backup) (by Mandoy) (scraped on Thu Jan 22 05:15:02 CET 2026) in Do new casino accounts really get better winning chances?:
I don't think there's any chance of anything like that happening because no strategy or skill works in gambling, and if that were true, most people would be opening accounts at new casinos and becoming very rich by winning.
In my own case, it has happened many times that I have lost on my first wager while gambling at a new casino, and besides, in the case of sports bookies, the result is not in my hands and as well not in the hands of the casino. on that point what do you think?
The assumption that the winning odds of new casino accounts are higher is largely a myth. It do not alter the hand that casinos do not change them because the account is new; the games are based on RNG or predetermined odds, and none of them is beneficial in the long run. As you mentioned, were new accounts to actually have an advantage then people would go ahead and open as many accounts as they wanted, and just have accounts that generate profits all the time, which plainly is not the case. A lot of players including me have lost their first bets in new casinos. In sportsbooks particularly, it is not the desire of the casino but the actual happening. Promotions can be desirable but they do not alter the underlying chances.
21. Post 66320810 (unedited backup) (by Onyeeze) (scraped on Wed Jan 21 23:29:32 CET 2026) in Do new casino accounts really get better winning chances?:
I don't think there's any chance of anything like that happening because no strategy or skill works in gambling, and if that were true, most people would be opening accounts at new casinos and becoming very rich by winning.
In my own case, it has happened many times that I have lost on my first wager while gambling at a new casino, and besides, in the case of sports bookies, the result is not in my hands and as well not in the hands of the casino. on that point what do you think?
That's pure luck I could think of, nothing about gambling is based on strategy, knowledge or analysis, no matter how smart a gambler feels he or she is, it doesn't count to winning in gambling, it only adds to your additional knowledge and boosts confidence in the society.
winning in gambling is all about luck not by what you know because what you analyze in gambling cannot leave you constant to winning if analysis gives winning and gambling that means many people wouldn't have experience any loss in gambling so there is no gambling that is sure that the gambler will win but if we are strategies at that point is good or fit the match that means you have the chances of winning but if your strategies all your predictions is not in line with the match you can lose the match at any time that is why gambling cannot give you Assurance of winning every time
22. Post 66320779 (unedited backup) (by Odogwu-Blockchain) (scraped on Wed Jan 21 23:18:38 CET 2026) in Do new casino accounts really get better winning chances?:
I don't think there's any chance of anything like that happening because no strategy or skill works in gambling, and if that were true, most people would be opening accounts at new casinos and becoming very rich by winning.
In my own case, it has happened many times that I have lost on my first wager while gambling at a new casino, and besides, in the case of sports bookies, the result is not in my hands and as well not in the hands of the casino. on that point what do you think?
That's pure luck I could think of, nothing about gambling is based on strategy, knowledge or analysis, no matter how smart a gambler feels he or she is, it doesn't count to winning in gambling, it only adds to your additional knowledge and boosts confidence in the society.
23. Post 66315671 (unedited backup) (by ChocolateBitcoinK) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 16:56:56 CET 2026) in Are we working to live, or living to work? :
Yes it is,due to inflation people are force to work hard. But I think it is the media influence that create hype of everything about luxurious lifestyle,about success about lot of money about powerfull status. It mends the minds of all that non stop working is the only way to get higher standard life style. The craze to get higher standard everybody run for it. I think people become materialistic . I felt that people now too much busy in their life that they even don't know about their relatives about their neighbors. They just become machine. infact Human relationship are losing value The elements of Contenment is lack now. People now not prefer to lead simple life. I feel that real peace of mind is missing now. Hence giving blame only to inflation for too much work is not right. Other factors also play driving role behind it.
Actually, you are right, our daily working life has completely turned our lives into robotic lives. We cannot blame inflation entirely for this because the busyness is mainly created by people generating extra money.
And in this case, we often forget to live a normal life and turn ourselves into robots. If we talk about Japan, then the number of old people in Japan is now high and the number of young people is low. This is because of the excessive pressure from the corporate world there, due to which young people refrain from getting married or having children.
That's true, but we can also make a change. Don't just go along with the flow because, in my opinion, we are free to make choices in our lives. However, many people are not ready for the risks, so they just work and follow life's rules without any progress because they do not do more to grow in the future. For us who still have freedom, we can create change within ourselves. Even though it's difficult and full of risks, I think it's worth trying.
Change is determined by effort, if you have effort, your change is sure, but without any effort, no matter how much research or planning we do, we will not be able to succeed in anything if we do not give our best effort. Everyone can make decisions, but it is not possible for many to work towards that decision and goal by making efforts towards it, or they cannot do it, and this is why they fail to achieve their goals. Basically, we have to achieve everything with risk, we cannot achieve anything without risk, we have to accept everything in whatever work we do, only then will our success come to us.
24. Post 66315300 (unedited backup) (by Bd officer) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 15:20:19 CET 2026) in Bangladesh Premier League 2025 Discussion thread:
And as we know, the T20 format is an easy target for any team, and the result was exactly as it was supposed to be. The Sylhet team finally organized, although it was a tight performance because with zero balls remaining, Sylhet managed to keep three wickets in hand.
Although the target was very small which was very easy to score 112 runs in 120 balls but Sylhet batsmen made it difficult. Some of Sylhet batsmen had very bad strike rates, Afif Hossain scored 3 runs in 9 balls and Moeen Ali scored 5 runs in 9 balls. However, the last over was very exciting. Sylhet needed 9 runs in the last over to win, where they took 3 runs in 5 balls and needed 6 runs in the last ball, then I thought Sylhet would lose, but Chris Woakes managed to hit a six in the last ball. Actually Chris Woakes has proved that the team needs an all-rounder like him. I was not satisfied with Sam Billings' performance, he should have done a little better.
Now we can see that Rangpur performed well in the beginning of the last season but could not do well towards the end, this season was no exception.
25. Post 66315190 (unedited backup) (by Zadicar) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 14:51:37 CET 2026) in Do casinos release big wins instantly?:
Have you ever heard of KYC levels? If so, I guess some casinos might require customers who win big to pass the next level of KYC in order to withdraw their winnings. I don't know which casinos implement that kind of KYC level - but it seems to exist because usually the lowest KYC level doesn't require personal documents and so on. The situation would be different if the customer was detected to have multiple accounts - the casino would likely handle that issue in a different way.
As far as I have explored in most of the casinos, what I find is that even if the lower kyc verification, like KYC verification level-1 or level-2, most of them ask for personal data for verification.
There, we often don't have to provide face verification, but we definitely have to verify with our ID card, and verifying with an ID card means doing KYC verification with our personal information. To be honest, I don't know if there is such a KYC verification where we don't have to verify with our personal data.
It is understandable that casinos did not announce huge wins immediately. A large win most likely results in additional checking even at lower KYC levels. Even the majority of the casinos will require ID, address confirmation, or even a self-portrait in order to be sure that everything is fair. This is not a matter of retaining your money but to avoid fraud, money laundering or various accounts. Small amounts can be canceled in a short time but larger sums may require a brief check clearing period. When this is done, the finances are disbursed without problem.
We would be able to understand that once a huge amount win happens then you would definitely be making up some checks specially if there's some bug involved or whatever issues even on some violation of terms and conditions on which they could put it as a reason for them not to payout the win but of course if you are that dealing up with some legit casinos or known as credible on which you do at least having the confidence that you would be able to be paid up. Once the casino had verified and sees nothing then they would be that releasing those wins without further questions. It would be that normal that they will be having some checks but if you are dealing with some shady casino then expect that there would be those alibis on which it turned out to be absurd and just obviously trying out to hold your winnings.
26. Post 66315022 (unedited backup) (by Mandoy) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 13:58:37 CET 2026) in Do casinos release big wins instantly?:
Have you ever heard of KYC levels? If so, I guess some casinos might require customers who win big to pass the next level of KYC in order to withdraw their winnings. I don't know which casinos implement that kind of KYC level - but it seems to exist because usually the lowest KYC level doesn't require personal documents and so on. The situation would be different if the customer was detected to have multiple accounts - the casino would likely handle that issue in a different way.
As far as I have explored in most of the casinos, what I find is that even if the lower kyc verification, like KYC verification level-1 or level-2, most of them ask for personal data for verification.
There, we often don't have to provide face verification, but we definitely have to verify with our ID card, and verifying with an ID card means doing KYC verification with our personal information. To be honest, I don't know if there is such a KYC verification where we don't have to verify with our personal data.
It is understandable that casinos did not announce huge wins immediately. A large win most likely results in additional checking even at lower KYC levels. Even the majority of the casinos will require ID, address confirmation, or even a self-portrait in order to be sure that everything is fair. This is not a matter of retaining your money but to avoid fraud, money laundering or various accounts. Small amounts can be canceled in a short time but larger sums may require a brief check clearing period. When this is done, the finances are disbursed without problem.
27. Post 66314717 (unedited backup) (by barisbilgili) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 11:55:07 CET 2026) in Are we working to live, or living to work? :
Yes it is,due to inflation people are force to work hard. But I think it is the media influence that create hype of everything about luxurious lifestyle,about success about lot of money about powerfull status. It mends the minds of all that non stop working is the only way to get higher standard life style. The craze to get higher standard everybody run for it. I think people become materialistic . I felt that people now too much busy in their life that they even don't know about their relatives about their neighbors. They just become machine. infact Human relationship are losing value The elements of Contenment is lack now. People now not prefer to lead simple life. I feel that real peace of mind is missing now. Hence giving blame only to inflation for too much work is not right. Other factors also play driving role behind it.
Actually, you are right, our daily working life has completely turned our lives into robotic lives. We cannot blame inflation entirely for this because the busyness is mainly created by people generating extra money.
And in this case, we often forget to live a normal life and turn ourselves into robots. If we talk about Japan, then the number of old people in Japan is now high and the number of young people is low. This is because of the excessive pressure from the corporate world there, due to which young people refrain from getting married or having children.
That's true, but we can also make a change. Don't just go along with the flow because, in my opinion, we are free to make choices in our lives. However, many people are not ready for the risks, so they just work and follow life's rules without any progress because they do not do more to grow in the future. For us who still have freedom, we can create change within ourselves. Even though it's difficult and full of risks, I think it's worth trying.
28. Post 66313554 (unedited backup) (by Nanga Parbat) (scraped on Tue Jan 20 00:02:31 CET 2026) in Are we working to live, or living to work? :
Inflation is making human life miserable. People are running for money and are turning into machines day by day.
The rise in the price of everything is making public life dangerous. People are now living for work. People are not able to keep up with life and money. Life has become a battlefield. However, we should break out of this cycle and enjoy life a little. Bring life back to normal, because after all We ourselves do not know when we will die and therefore we should earn an income not just for money but to enjoy our lives and spend quality time with our family.
Yes it is,due to inflation people are force to work hard. But I think it is the media influence that create hype of everything about luxurious lifestyle,about success about lot of money about powerfull status. It mends the minds of all that non stop working is the only way to get higher standard life style. The craze to get higher standard everybody run for it. I think people become materialistic . I felt that people now too much busy in their life that they even don't know about their relatives about their neighbors. They just become machine. infact Human relationship are losing value The elements of Contenment is lack now. People now not prefer to lead simple life. I feel that real peace of mind is missing now. Hence giving blame only to inflation for too much work is not right. Other factors also play driving role behind it.
29. Post 66312499 (unedited backup) (by Mahdirakib) (scraped on Mon Jan 19 18:29:50 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
However, it is unfortunate that despite Virat Kohli's brilliant performance of 124 runs today, India lost this match due to a lack of teamwork.
Yeah, Kohli needed support from another top order batsman to do something exceptional yesterday. None of the top order batsmen showed responsibility to chase the big target except Kohli. Nitish Reddy and Harshit Rana had given some support to Kohli to build a decent partnership. But those weren't enough.
30. Post 66309276 (unedited backup) (by _BlackStar) (scraped on Sun Jan 18 21:39:44 CET 2026) in Do casinos release big wins instantly?:
-snip-
You have largely restated the language I expressed in your own language, in fact, according to my experience, those who do KYC verification at a reputable casino and then win a big amount are not asked for KYC verification a second time. However, those who have opened multiple accounts through the same IP or suspicious activity is basically what you said, KYC verification is asked again.
Finally, I would like to say that it is not enough to just have a licensed casino, but to be on the list, you have to verify the company that issued the license and find out about their reputation, and at the same time, you have to find out about the reputation of that casino in different communities, then basically we will be able to play fair.
Have you ever heard of KYC levels? If so, I guess some casinos might require customers who win big to pass the next level of KYC in order to withdraw their winnings. I don't know which casinos implement that kind of KYC level - but it seems to exist because usually the lowest KYC level doesn't require personal documents and so on. The situation would be different if the customer was detected to have multiple accounts - the casino would likely handle that issue in a different way.
31. Post 66308870 (unedited backup) (by virasog) (scraped on Sun Jan 18 19:32:01 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
~ But even then, the question remains: Can New Zealand repeat the good batting performance that secured the victory in the third match like the second ODI? My answer to this is that they have that ability.
And since the pitch conditions are batting-friendly, and toss could play a big role here, like in the previous matches, so I still think there is a 50/50 chance for both teams.
Well, you were right. New Zealand has given a big target today, where India is struggling to chase the target. There was a big partnership between Phillips and Mitchell, which helped NZ to give a target of 338 runs. India has already lost 4 wickets. Everything will depend on Virat Kohli now. India will have a little chance to win the match if Kohli can play a very big innings.
Well, New Zealand have managed to win the ODI series, and this is more important as they did it in India's home ground. We know that beating India at home isn't anything easy but the New Zealand team has created history today at Indore, they won the series by 2-1.
Just looking at the history, the Indian team have lost the ODI series at home just four times since 2010. That pretty much means how strong they are at home. Prior to today's loss, they lost an ODI to Australia in 2023 and also in 2019. The other two occasions where they lost were in 2015 against South Africa and way back in 2012 against Pakistan.
32. Post 66307997 (unedited backup) (by Mahdirakib) (scraped on Sun Jan 18 14:57:37 CET 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
~ But even then, the question remains: Can New Zealand repeat the good batting performance that secured the victory in the third match like the second ODI? My answer to this is that they have that ability.
And since the pitch conditions are batting-friendly, and toss could play a big role here, like in the previous matches, so I still think there is a 50/50 chance for both teams.
Well, you were right. New Zealand has given a big target today, where India is struggling to chase the target. There was a big partnership between Phillips and Mitchell, which helped NZ to give a target of 338 runs. India has already lost 4 wickets. Everything will depend on Virat Kohli now. India will have a little chance to win the match if Kohli can play a very big innings.