Unfortunately, these are the state of affairs in the gambling world. Not only did AI made things innovative in some games, but it also affected some of the dealers where it created AI-generated human figures and models to act as dealers.

In our world where AI has started to take precedence at least over anything in our lives, this is one of those moments where I wished that gambling companies should have chosen otherwise. Nothing beats the human element (and touch) and seeing real-life dealers in a gambling game. It made things more "humanly" in our perspective given that almost everything is being controlled either by machine or process in our computers.

Will this concept survive? I think it will only get worse from here- gambling companies would develop AI dealers and closely resemble them to humans as much as possible in order to cut costs and savings on their part.

If AI can play the role of a human and do it accurately, then I think people will be happy using AI and it will no longer require humans or pay them the same as humans. Moreover, the way AI is improving and doing some things so accurately, I think AI will be able to continue to work like live dealers. If this AI can continue to play like live dealers and solve them accurately, then of course people will be happy using AI.

Some individuals may like it and some may not, but does it really matter to them ?
In a society were everyone doesn't support one thing they will just do what is best for them, and of cause they will want to reduce cost as a result welcoming AI. On tables

First, what Scout Gaming is doing is big shift. I just read that they are preparing to launch Scout AI Casino commercially. Whereas Blackjack and Roulette will have AI dealer. They also offer direct integration with operators own wallet, KYC and responsible gambling system. Just like their fantasy sport product do. So what you said operator can set their own brand and dealer personality is their main selling point.

But right now this trend is going on in entire industry. BetHog claims in their Sentient Studios project that their AI dealer Sunnynhas been 10 time more popular than live dealer in testing. This is  new venture from founders of FanDuel. As surprising as it may sound, I have doubt about this claim.

Normally, I don't play casinos games, let alone dealer games or table games, I just want to air my own view. First of all, the world is advancing and new technologies are being developed every day, therefore, I believe it is only normal for the gambling industry to embrace these advancements and explore how they can improve player's experience.  However,  some players may not find this new technology appealing because they are more comfortable with the traditional ways of playing casino games.

I really don't think it might matter to most gamblers because what matters the most is if they can win. AI dealers or live dealers on an online platform are both suseptible to mechanical lapses or lagging or technical issues and what gamblers would look out for is if they can fund as well as withdraw their funds without hitches and if support is responsive in the end Incase complications arise.
If the casino is licensed then I see no reason why gamblers won't opt to try it out to have a feel of how AI dealers respond. It actually makes no reasonable difference to me.

For me personally it's a tough sell to replace real live dealers. People play live casino games specifically for the human element and trust. Once you swap the real person for an AI avatar, players are going to suspect it's just another pre rendered RNG game. I would rather play at  a live casino than at an online casino with AI dealers.

Well, if people are talking with their AI girlfriends and boyfriends, i don't see why this wouldn't catch up. People might even enjoy trying to break them with weird requests and try prompts on them.

Personally i hate the whole idea of talking to AI, but if there needs to be a human or humanoid that's seen talking with people, i prefer knowing it's AI then wondering about their poor work conditions.

Except the casino owners hide who is behind the dealings, if the players are going to be communicated properly and as usual without any obstruction, that wouldn't be an issue, at least players gets what they ask for.

It's up to the task of the casino to deliver what works best for the players, either live or AI, whatever works better should be implemented and it's not the job of the players to look into that.

Different people will have different thoughts about this, because a lot of gamblers might not care whether the operator is a real human or an artificial intelligence because the only thing they care about is playing their game and going away after that. However, there are also gamblers who might not like it if the operator is not a real human but an artificial intelligence because they want actual humans to be dealing the table because human dealers are obviously more interactive with the game and gamblers, they might read chats, talk to people, answer their questions at times, etc.

However, it doesn't really matter much, because in the future, these things are going to happen regardless of the fact that some gamblers might not like it, and I'm sure AI agents and operators will also be improved over time and they will become more interactive and compete pretty well with humans in this area as well. Casinos might also give gamblers the choice to either play with human operators or with AI, but this will cost them more, so they will probably just choose one option, they might ask their customers what they would like more and then go with that option.

I can't say how trustworthy and popular AI dealers will be with gamblers, but if I were to speak for myself, I would never trust them and would avoid games where AI is used instead of humans for live games. Even after serving cards from human dealers, sometimes I feel that there is corruption and irregularities. When I lose frequently, how can a programmed AI dealer gain trust that there is no corruption? I have not yet prepared myself to accept AI dealers as my gambling partners.

I think the link is hidden because I spent some time searching but couldn't find it. Thanks for the link.

Now back to the casino, the cga certification has spincrypto.com, which is not reachable (it is down, I don't know since when) at the time of creating this post, while the one in this thread is spincrypto1/com, which is different from what the cert have and we don't know if this is a mirror site or a phishing site.

I also saw @Crypto Library with "spincrypto.org", which is also using the same licence but a completely different UI.

---

I am starting to think that there is a scheme behind this license. I might be wrong, but it is becoming suspicious.

However, there is a bright side to this as well. That cannot be ignored.
As you said, main advantage of these AI dealer is customization. Operator can launch table in local language ​​or even create dealer avatar based on clone of brand ambassador. For instance, if any player want to play while conversing in local language or prefer any specific, personalized vibe then this could be quite appealing. But at the end of the day any casino experience is all about fun and human interaction. element that are difficult for cold code or algorithm to fully replicate.

I completely agree with you that people will prefer real human dealer. First of all Scout Gaming Group or Sentient Studio is planning to use AI avatar in live casino, thereby reducing reliance on real dealers. They primarily want to cut cost and avoid extra hassle of logistic. Managing physical studio and assigning duty to dealer handling all this is by no means easy.

But question is will gambler ever actually trust any AI dealer? To be honest gamblers are incredibly superstitious by nature. When sitting at real table seeing physical card being shuffled or wheel spinning right in front of them instill sense of trust and satisfaction. Can playing against AI avatar really replicate that feeling? I don't think so.

Given how advanced AI-assisted tools have become, I think that after just a few minutes of conversation with an AI dealer, most gamblers will either forget it's not human or genuinely enjoy the funny conversations, so this new concept might become the gold standard in a few years.

Something about this doesn’t sit well with me right away. I prefer live gambling. And here, I don’t see any fundamental difference compared to slots or some other algorithms. In general, the desire to save on salaries (by replacing everything and everyone with AI) is already starting to cross all reasonable boundaries. The quality of the final service is already starting to suffer, as in this example. Of course, there are gamblers who don’t care, but the rest will most likely prefer to play gambling on another platform.

Some casinos will definitely try to implement AI dealers on their tables, some will look like real people while others will look like fantasy characters, very similar to those Virtual YouTubers which have become so popular among young people.

I think eventually, people won't be able to see the different between real people and virtual characters, so I think the future is going to be full of virtual characters and AIs which will be part of the gambling industry.

I have been seeing AI dealers in live casinos on the Blackjack and Baccarat machines for a few years now. Not really a fan of them TBH. As far as online goes, people already feel the games are rigged sometimes, I think they better try to stick to live dealers just to keep assumptions down.

Players uses live games to get somewhat realistic experience of going to a real casino but to be honest, live dealer don't care about you and they don't even care whether you win or lose so it is a huge different from the actual casino. And if that is their jobs then AI can do it better and if that is supposed to happen then it will, no matter how many people lose their live dealer jobs.

And even if the entire crypto gambling industry adopted AI, I guess the number of people who lose their jobs will be still in hundreds.

Even when they offer us a live dealer, we already feel like we're being cheated. And now they offer us AI dealers, which I think would make the live experience really bad and could lower gamblers' trust in the casino.

One of the reasons people play live casino games at online casinos is to get the same experience they could get when playing in a land based casino. We socialize with humans, not AI. For me, I don't see many good reasons for using AI dealers in casinos. I feel like it's more for the casinos, not the players. It's mostly for cost efficiency.

The best use of these AI live dealers I can imagine is when the AI dealer characters are based on popular characters that many people like, such as idols, anime characters, etc. I think there's a market for it. It would be good if we could choose/customize our own AI dealers. But in that PR, it says the operators are the ones who can set the personality.

If it works better then there is no problem, I don't mind gambling on a casino that's been operated by AI, if it doesn't feel like a whacked job then I am good, for me it's all about my gambling experience.

If AI can do it then there is no problem, although I will like to experience it first because I don't believe that AI can do it better than human, I believe it's not yet the time, I will accept this information with a grain of salt for now.

When the time comes I believe that AI will be ready to become a manager and operator at the same time.

The tool now works though the data seems to be a little off. Earlier on i thought the mempool was nearly empty but in reality it is not thanks to what Cricktor pointed out. Maybe it could be related to the error NotATether talked about yesterday.

As for me, I don't care. I want to play, not chat. If it doesn't give the casino any advantage, fine, so be it. If it just talks to me in my language, that's fine too.

I go to a land-based casino for the excitement of the experience. An online casino can't compare to that, in my opinion. So let it be an AI bot - it doesn't matter.

If the reaction of AI to audience is seamless then I would prefer AI dealers coz they can be created to be pleasing to the  eyes, this is my personal statement because I am somehow biased and like AI imaging because they look more beautiful.  But if the interaction of AI feels off, I'd rather have real people because of the real interaction between two person.


It is normal, because human like same specie interaction.


I think it can, first saves the platform some maintenance costs.  Second, probably most gambler won't mind because they are more focused on the game,

Now, it's a question of what players will want later and not actually what they prefer right now, there could be a lot of players that prefer a live dealer  right now but if the AI dealer goes live, it could be appealing to a lot of players too and that their choice bet a human dealer and AI is going to change, that's why I said that it's more about what players will later want. Before things like this are being developed, I believe that the developers and operators must have already done some background check to know that it's something that people will find very likeable and relevant to use. Personally, I would prefer to play with my follow human  but if AI can as well do the same thing, I would want to try it out and if it feel same way as dealing with the live person, I could continue using the AI, although there's something very much important to think of, if this AI dealer goes live, can human win against it?

That's why I prefer live casino rather than dealing with Ai dealers, since interaction is truly different.

We don't know if everything is fair with Ai thing out there and can't afford to trust that kind of set up knowing that everything with them is questionable, since this is new for now.

Sooner or later it became a main thing in online scene, but since we are still enjoy things with human touches. I think many casino continue to use their Ai dealers, especially if there's still huge demand to their players.

Let’s be honest here, AI is gradually replacing different types of human jobs, and that’s something I would never want to see happen because it could affect so many people. The truth is, we don’t really know what the future holds. What if AI ends up replacing us in our current jobs? That would be a nightmare for many of us.

When it comes to replacing human dealers with AI, I believe it could have a big impact on the players’ experience. AI may be able to imitate human facial expressions and actions but we know the fact that it cannot express genuine emotions or the kind of personal connection that a  human dealers can offer to the players. If that replacements happens, It would be boring or it will give less enjoyable feeling to us.

I think that at this stage of development people do not really trust AI, so the choice will be towards live dealers. But in the future everything may change, so what may seem unacceptable now will be the norm in the future. And for casinos it is clear that this will be more profitable, because they will not need to pay salaries to dealers, because their work will be performed by AI. Among my friends, I sometimes hear how, thanks to AI, the number of jobs in different companies is being reduced.

I think many gamblers choose live casinos specifically because of the human interaction, real emotions, and the atmosphere of a real casino.
On the other hand, AI technology looks very attractive for casino operators themselves.  Plus, they could run gaming tables around the clock in different languages and customize them for specific audiences. That’s where I see the biggest commercial advantage of this technology.

But there’s another interesting point. According to Scout Gaming, AI will only handle interactions with players, while game outcomes will be determined by a separate certified random number generator.

Personally, I think this concept will find its audience, especially among younger gamblers who are already used to interacting with AI. However, I’m not convinced that most live casino fans will want to give up real dealers.

Considering from the angle of physical gambling and locate games it's a leap but do I fancy it? Nahhh it definitely might be a selling point for live casinos especially with proper marketing key words that scream provably fair since they assume the randomisation of an AI is believed to be mathematically better.

On the other hand if the dealing is done via AI on online sites still well it's like an unnecessary selling point if you ask me besides before now the dealings were algorithm based and AI too is algorithm based.

AI with the realistic view can be a smart ove, no need to keep paying the actual humans but it is going to make a huge difference, I am not sure because live games got customers but it is not that compared to the simple casino games, maybe in future things will change?

B2B gaming provider is now directly into the casino is kind of another interesting, what they will do better than existing ones?

This is why when I want to upload an image to Bitcointalk, I explicitly go to talkimg.com and select the file or just Ctrl-V paste it.

By the way, I haven't found any GOOD way to share files on a forum.

All of the image hosts either have expiration dates or dubious privacy and security standards.

ভাই রিটার্ন কমই পাবেন ডাবল প্রফিট করতে পারলেই যথেষ্ট মনে করতে হবে, কিন্তু যদি ৫৭কে তে বেশি বেশি ক্রয় করে রাখতে পারতাম তাহলে কিন্তু বুলরানে ৩ গুন প্রফিট নেওয়া আশা করা যেতো কারণে পরবর্তী বুলরানে ১৮০কে বা ২০০কে মতো আশা করা যেতে পারে।
যাক ভাই তাইলে দাম বাড়ালেন হা হা। আবার জানি এই প্রাইসও মিসিং না হয়ে যায়, আপনি তো বেশি বেশি জাম্পিয়ের আশায় থাকেন। তাই আবার পতন হলে দেরি না করে কিনে ফেলবেন, যদি এভাবে সুযোগ হাতছাড়া হয়ে যায় তাইলে আবার আফসোস করতে হবে।

ভাই এখানে কথা আছে যদি হরমুজ প্রণালী আবার বন্ধ করে দেয় তাইলে তো হয়ে গেলো। ইউরেনিয়াম নিয়ে যত সমস্যা কিন্তু নিউজে শুনলাম ইরানের পরমানু সংস্থার মোহাম্মদ এসলামি ঘোষণা দিয়েছে তারা ইউরেনিয়ামের কার্যক্রম বন্ধ করবে না আরও মজুদ চালিয়ে যাবে। তাহলে তো ইরান যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের মধ্যে উত্তেজনা সহজেই শেষ হচ্ছে না।

---

আসলে বাংগালী চোরের জাতি তা জার্মান পর্যটক হারে হারে টের পেয়েছে। আসলে আমরা মানুষ হবো কবে? একজন বিদেশি নাগরিক তাকে সাহায্য করার পরিবর্তে তার সরলতার সুযোগ নিয়ে তার সাথে প্রতারণা করতে হবে। আমাদের দেশে জার্মান থেকে পর্যটক আছে এটা আমাদের জন্য গর্বের বিষয় কিন্তু আমরা এমন কাজ করি যা তিনি তো বাংলাদেশের কথা শুনাম করবে দুরের কথা, তার সাথে যার দেখা হবে তাদের বাংলাদেশে না আসার জন্য সতর্ক করে দিবে।
ইউটিউব

I have been testing BPIP usersctipt made by member Crypto Library and his AI buddy, and so far it looks like everything is working exactly the same as with extension.
It would be good if other members could do the same thing, so we can find any potential bugs quicker.
For download links please check few posts above, or use this link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224821.msg67212908#msg67212908

Translated Topic in Pidgin Language; Complete Tutorial to use di ShareX with TalkImg/others for Newbie.  
Original Topic: Complete Tutorial for using ShareX with TalkImg/others for Newbie
Author: Crypto Library

---

---

I know say dey don already getsome tutorial but dem dey separate from each other. And na why I wan try to make dis tutorial as di complete guideline for whr e go dey possible to upload screenshot/GIF directly to Image Host(talkIMG/and other).

di most important part for dis tutorial no go be just to install ShareX but to take full advantage of em features, wey go make our process to take screenshots and upload dem manually much faster.

For long time now me sef no use ShareX even as I install am for my pc because I no see di better guidelines for am as first install am. Even my local mate dey for dis kind situation so I think I go make di tutorial about am as my local mate suggest.

First of all, make i tell you wetin we go fit do after we do dis tutorial-

• We no go need to take di screenshot manually, save or copy am and den go to di image uploader and upload am.
      *We fit directly take di screenshot and upload am.
• And for di same time, we fit edit am after we take di screenshot.
• We fit upload di screen record as di GIF through di ShareX
• e dey make everything easier with di right hot key setup

1. First, you go need to install ShareX from di official source.

2. Den, wetin I go suggest make you do be say na to set up di TalkImg API or any other image host wey you wan use.( For having di TalkIMG API you need to an account for di talkimg by PM joker_josue)
    I dey quote from RickDeckard post-
    
-*den you go need to copy di code from TryNinja's posts

3. Now na di time to get di full benefit of em feature with proper setting and di hotkeys. And for dad I go like to suggest make you set all di hot keys like dis or you fit set am as you wish.
  


4. Den Click di After Capture Tasks> den select Open di Image Editor, Save Image for di file^{remember say di highlight option na dem be di ones wey dey select} , So dat when you go capture di screenshot em go take you to di editor interface where you fit edit di image and also to upload am directly.

- Image Editor Interface


5. Now click on di After Upload tasks den select di Show"After Upload" winodw and "Copy URL to di clipboard", So dat e go bring dis interface to copy di image link or image or save di image etc


6. For GIF hotkey settings, follow di screenshots-

 
Now, when you go press your Hotkeys^{(like- shift+ prt scr)} for GIF capture, em go capture your screen and also automatically to di TalkImg


Now ShareX+TalkImg don dey ready to use.


"N.B.- Definitely, I believe say, ShareX fit be set up more professionally dan dis process wey I do, but I do dis tutorial for people wey dey new for basic and common use purposes. And for di same time, more tricks and suggestions dey welcome  ."

Other Languages-

• বাংলা

Yes I do agree with you but then again there are different stuff to weigh here before are user eventually makes a decision. First off is privacy and use of third party softwares and second is convenience. For someone like me I would barely wanna use it as a usual get go because I generally find third party softwares inconvenient most times.

That reminds me, wasn't there an extension that allowed you just hit the add image button like you were uploading from an app? I'd appreciate if you had the link.

Well, I would guess that it has been discussed already; we have a simple explanation. A casino is where you play, and game provider is the one who sold the casino software to the casino you are gambling. It is as simple as that. But I might have to remind you all something that was not discussed here at all. The gambling in the crytpo world started off with no game provider, we had on-chain gambling with SatoshiDice first, then with primedice and JustDice. We had off-chain gambling that was provably fair as well; you could actually check.

These days, because of game providers, every single casino has a bunch of games that we can never check to see if they are fair or not; we might be getting scammed, and we would have no idea, maybe the games are rigged, and we do not have a clue. You want to know why sports betting is as big as it is?

Because while there could be match fixing there too, at big enough level teams wants to win, you can't pay Real Madrid enough to make them lose, they will want to win, and maybe they will fail, but not because of any fixing. So sports betting is played a lot because people do not trust these game providers, no matter if they have a license or not.

Kudos for effort, BUT I think a huge warning is in place: I would not want to have a shortcut to upload the content of my screen to a third-party website! One mistake and you risk hurting your privacy!

I always thought that if a casino had a license, there was no need to worry about the games it offered, because a licensed casino would make sure that all its games were tested and verified. But now you're talking about licensing for game providers, which is something new to me. To be honest I don't even always check whether a casino has a license. I simply play at casinos with a good reputation, so I've never really gone that deep into researching casinos, their licenses, and the licenses of their game providers.

So Trust Wallet calls it Secret Phrase?
If so, it's just a different term for the term "BIP39 Seed". Wallets can call it "Seed phrase", "mnemonic" seed, "backup phrase", anything synonymous with "phrase" as long as it's established as BIP39 compliant.

The only weird thing is calling it as "Seed" (Binary Seed) since it implies that it's not a group of words but the data where the master private key is derived from.
Some wallet still use that term since its the encoded entropy of where the private keys are based from anyways.

It's weird that you're not aware of the difference between private and public keys.
Let's say both your keys of a padlock, but your private key can unlock it and public key can only watch what's in it.
In a bitcoin UTXO, it can be only be unlocked by its private key you can only check it by anyone who knows your public key or its hash.

Now for master private key, see that derivation path in some of your wallet's advanced settings? Like m/84h/0h/0h?
That "m" is your master private key, usually encoded as xprv key.
You haven't asked but if it's the xprv or xpub of any of the level you see in the derivation path, you call it "extended private key" or "extended public key".

Change to new signature and avatar

Ignore the tag if you have...

Where did you see the term "secret phrase"? It should be the same thing as seed phrase.


Your private key represents a random 256 bit number. You have a private key for each of your Bitcoin addresses.


Your public key is derived from your private key, and your master public key is derived from your master private key.
Your master private key generates all your private keys, and your master public key generates all your public keys.


This is true if you have a 2 of 3 multi-signature wallet.

No worries, I'm quite sure I've stated somewhere in this thread that anyone is free to do anything they want with the extension.

As long as it doesn't hammer our server with excessive requests.

Then it is better to invest in Bitcoin instead to not get rugged by such type of tail risk. If someone has to invest in alt coins then one should only choose those alt coins that have been doing well in market for many years to be on the safe end.

I personally invest in Bitcoin and trade it and sometimes I invest in alt coins that have been in the market for years and so far I have never faced such kind of issues. But for better safety one should prefer to invest in Bitcoin, it is not worth it to take such type of risk at all.

I'd also like to address this question:
Essentially, all these recovery methods involve the person restoring access obtaining the minimum number of keys needed to sign a transaction. For example, with a 2-of-3 wallet, recovery means getting hold of two keys.

The wallet itself continues to work exactly as before. But since only two keys remain available, it loses its most important feature: the ability to function without one of them.

What pressures the prices actually isn't the hacks that happened, but the fears that way more hacks are coming with the development of AI.

Now there's particularly a lot of fear mongering about that on Twitter and in some way it feels at least partially orchestrated.

We've been through worse periods without this much FUD and with better price action.

Aside that of bitgets hack, I see a number of investors that have been evicting of network liquidation as well, which is disheartening because the number of them couldn't maximize the opportunity to trade and be profitable, instead there have been countless occurrence of trading loss due to liquidation by those that think they are more of a professional traders and other inexperienced traders that all constitutes the losses that we have in network liquidation and so on.

Judging by the fact that one quarter of the loss happened in September 24th when bitget was hacked, I feel it's safe to say that the market will recover quite fine. Although Bitcoin price was arguably meant to hit $98k or so, this is a minor setback and would face out naturally. No need to panick.

First of all, are you trying to gather informations on how to become a bookie/ game provider? If that's the case, good luck with your endeavors.
Like Moreno said, both parties must get licensed, although it differs because casinos are dealing directly with the "consumers", so they get Business-to-Consumer license (B2C), while the providers get Business-to-Business--- it's more like the same thing that applies to the supply chain. Manufactures---- warehousers--- wholesalers--- retailers--- consumers.

You should be fine if you add proper credits in github and greasyfork pages.
I didn't know what vide coding was, but I suspected it was connected with AI in some way

বহু দিন/মাস/বছর ট্রাস্টলিস্টে হাত দেইনি। যখন প্রথম প্রথম হাত দিছিলাম তখন তেমন কিছুই বুঝতাম না, জানতাম না এই ডিটি ফিটি জিনিস কি। ফলে আনইনটেশন্যালি হয়তো দুই একটা শত্রু বানায় ফেলছি। আবার কারন ছাড়াও অনেকের ডিস-ট্রাস্টে ঢুকে গেছি কেমনে জানি। আর যখন বুঝলাম ডিটি জিনিসটা কি, তখন আর এটা নিয়ে ভাবতে ইচ্ছা হয়নি। রেপুটেশন বোর্ডের মারামারি কামড়াকামড়ি, নিজেদের বোর্ডের যত তত ব্যাড রেপু, সব মিলায়ে ডিসেপয়েন্টেড হয়ে যাই। এজন্য আমার লিস্ট বহুবছর থেকেই ভার্জিন পরে আছে। আপনার মতো আমার নিজেরও পার্টিসিপেন্ট করতে ইচ্ছা করে না। ইমনিই রিয়েল লাইফের সোদনে মানসিক অবস্থা তামাতামা হয়ে গেছে, তার মধ্যে কার আবার ইচ্ছা করে ইন্টারনেটে বসে কারোর সাথে ঝগড়া করার?

এনিওয়ে, আনঅফিসিয়্যালি, ফোরাম জগতের "সালমান মুক্তাদির" হিসেবে আপনাকে আমি মনে করি।

---

না থাকবে গ্যাসের চুলা, না থাকবে ২৫০০ টাকা দিয়ে গ্যাস কেনার ঝামেলা। ২৫০০ কেন, ৫০০০ করুক, তাতে আমার কোনো যায় আসে না, কারন আমি সিলিন্ডার কিনিনা ৬ মাস প্লাস। খড়ি, আর ইলেকট্রিক চুলায় বেঁচে আছি।

---

ঘর দিয়ে বের করে দিবে!

রেপুটেশন এমন বানাও যে, ইনোসেন্ট হলেও জায়গায় জায়গায় জানি গালি খাওয়া লাগে। আমাদের বর্তমান অবস্খা হইছে এমন। কিছু না করেও আওয়ামী/ছাত্রলীগ/শিবির/গুপ্ত/শাহাবাগী/বটবাহিনি ট্যাগ খাইতে হয়। এই হলো রিয়েলিটি।

So I did my quick research and it will cost around $5k to $6k for a bingo game license, if that's a lot I guess yes for an individual pricing. But for these casinos, it won't be that much.

I think that this has been discussed for so many times and many of the forum members said that it is part of gaining trust to the community. Because if they can buy a license for themselves, that means that they are into serious business. Although there are casinos which doesn't have a license but maintained a good reputation for years up to present.

Gaming providers like pragamtic play also need to get a license but not for the gambling but they get a different one for B2B from the same Malta Gaming Authority and it is called MGA B2B Critical Supply Licence. And there are also invidual testing labs which is responsible to test the fairness of the results provided by their game which doesn't mean they can operate a casino but they can provide games to the casinos or anyone who needs it.

From what I remember researching once... they also need a gaming software license issued by competent regulator, and actually, there are two different things.... one license that authorize they to operate as a software provider (a type of permit) and another one that is the technical certification of everything it produces and that verifies yours games, one does not replace the other. At least, from what I remember, that os how it should work, but in our "perfect world"....

Why it is no so evident to us? Because this is a bigger concern for the cassino than for us, players.
And there is no "worldwide license" that automatically authorizes a provider for any market... each country has its own laws and requirements and sometimes the same provider needs several certifications to be able to operate in different regions.

Here's one example, Pragmatic play provider how much to spend to get this license with API integration.
[1] https://www.orioninfosolutions.com/blog/pragmatic-play-api

Don't all of these games earn your trust? Since this is B2B people already know about this game, now live casino how it should be done, because a gambling player still believes in the casino instead of its provider.

Nice work and I will test it, but maybe you should first asked permission from suchmoon and BPIP extension guys for doing this, even though code is not closed source for extension.
And if you used any AI tools in making this, you should post also that and give credits for that.

Many gamblers do not consider the game provider's license but rather consider the casino's license first because a casino will not put an unlicensed game on their platform that is licensed to avoid some legal implications of doing so.

Gamblers are concerned themselves with casino licenses, while casinos are concerned themselves with game provider licenses.

If you observe closely you'll discover that alot of casinos are actually having similar games and infact what separates most of them is their originals. Those game providers require licenses to operate and similarly they give permission to these casinos to use them too.

Casinos themselves on the other hand have their own licences they need most times from the government of that region to operate sadly a lot of them don't acquire these licences.

In casino industry, B2B licenses and RNG certification are absolutely essential.
Without these, no reputable casino site will host any provider's game on its platform.

So, how do providers build this trust and credibility?
They obtain publicly verified RNG certificate from third party auditor. These are secured from company like eCOGRA or GLI. As a result, player can be certain that game are not rigged and are completely fair. Holding top-tier license, such as those from Malta or UKGC indicate that provider is legitimate and regulated. So providers demonstrate fairness through third-party audits. And showcase their legitimacy through toptier license!

On the other hand, some smaller provider build trust solely by using Provably Fair technology, which allow player to verify on blockchain whether result have been manipulated. Additionally, trust level increase manifold when major casino like Bitz, Earnbet, Stake, Sportsbet integrate these games.

There's also a chain of government that governs licensing companies and authorities, and  as they maybe ranked according to their possessions and influence.
I can't be a specific jurisdiction that takes the charge of licensing game providers, but it wouldn't be other than the same regulatory authorities.



I guess license fee is rated according to the scales and production of the casino.
If the casino is covering a wide range and long duration, it may cost them more on the license fee just as the revenue taxes.



License also proves how legitimate the casino is and from its term's of services with user's determines if it can be trusted or not.
Perhaps all licensed casino's worth trusted. Some breaks the legal agreements.

Yes! Cost incurred by provider are by no mean lower than those of casino themselve.
In many cases, they are actually higher!

Obtaining and annually renewing B2B license from MGA or UKGC involve paying fees amounting to thousands of euro or pound. Even in Curacao, separate B2B fee has been introduced under new LOK legislation.

However license fees aren't the only or even primary expense for game provider. Their real financial hit come from lab testing. Auditing every new game or slot release through agency like eCOGRA or GLI cost thousands of dollar. Furthermore, to offer game to player in regulated market such as UK, Sweden, Ontario or Germany, provider must obtain specific local B2B license. That entails massive expense!

As far as I understand, licenses for game providers are issued by the same organization that issues licenses to online casinos. 🙋

Licenses are quite expensive, but the main costs for game providers aren't related to licensing. Game providers must have their games certified by independent labs. And that's very expensive... Therefore, games from licensed providers are considered fair and verified gambling (even if a particular player has long losing streaks).

As for the interaction between licensed casinos and licensed game providers, it's not a matter of trust... These two organizations report to the same regulator. Therefore, licensed casinos only cooperate with licensed game providers (and vice versa). Otherwise, they risk losing their license. In other words, it's a closed system.

Therefore, if someone wants to open their own online casino or create their own gambling games, they need to decide in advance whether to operate within the license or in a "gray area." There is no other way.💁

A lot of us would prefer to stick with centralized exchanges because of multiple reasons. I think centralized exchanges are way better when it comes to useful features like SL limit. CEXs actually keeps reinvesting and bring new features. I feel that DEXs stop their development at some point because the contract is already live and people are already using the platform. They do not feel any changes are required once the platform goes live which actually keeps DEXs stagnant from growth.

CEXs have huge competition so they have to advance on technology and their resources and features. These CEXs would always bring in new features which would be useful to both, the trader and the exchange. Only a handful of people would still prefer DEXs over CEXs.

The relevant workflow may be even easier if the given multisig wallet is coordinated by  descriptor-based wallet, ^{for example by Sparrow}. In this case

Back up 1: Seed A (+seed phrase for A if any), multisig descriptor,
Back up 2: Seed B (+seed phrase for B if any), multisig descriptor.
Back up 3: Seed C (+seed phrase for C if any), multisig descriptor.

You meant this backup method?:


That is to ensure that even if the owner lost one backup, any of the two can still recover the wallet since those contain two different Seed Phrases and the third cosigner's xpub.
In case of theft, even one backup is compromised, the hacker still can't spend from the wallet.

I think that has nothing to do with it.


If that happened in the early years, such an event could have had a significant impact on the Bitcoin market. But the market now is more mature, so even if bad events like that happen, they don't affect the market that badly. On top of that, positive news from institutions continuing to increase their accumulation and improving Bitcoin regulations, positive news like this has helped maintain confidence in the market.

তাই তো দেখেছিলাম ভাই এবং সেখানেও ছোট করে একটি রিপ্লে করেছিলাম। তবে এখানেও একই কথা বলবো, যখন হ্যাক হওয়ার ঘটনা ঘটেছিলো তখনই বাজারে কোন নেগেটিভ প্রভাব পড়ে নাই তাই Q3 এর হ্যাকিং হওয়ার ঘটনার প্রভাব Q4 এ পড়বে বলে আমার মনে হয় না। তবে টানা তিন মাস ধরে মার্কেটে পজিটিভ দেখলাম কিন্তু শেষ ৩ মাস কেমন হবে তা আমরা বলতে পারবো না। আমি অক্টোবর মাসকে পজিটিভ ভাবে দেখবো এবং নবেম্বর বা ডিসেম্বরে মার্কেট ডাউন হতে পারে।
যদি মিটারের নাম্বার ভিন্ন থাকে তাহলে তো সেটা আপনার লাগে দুইনাম্বারি করা হয়েছে। অহেতুক অন্যের বিল আপনি দিবেন কেনো? ভাই কারেন্টের বিলের রিডিং লেখে তারা মাদারবোর্ড তারা ভালোকরে দেখেও না, আন্দাজে বিল লিখে নিয়ে যায়। এছাড়াও বাসার মালিক আপনার সাথে চিটিং করতে পারে যেমন অন্যের বিল আপনার উপর চাপায় দিছে? এই বিষয় আপনার খাতিয়ে দেখা উচিত। হঠাৎ করে এক মাসে এত বিল বেশি হওয়া কখনই স্বাভাবিক ঘটনা হতে পারে না।

Seriously I don’t understand what you mean by proper set up for back up. But one thing I know is that for a standard M -of- N multisig wallet like a 2-of-3 wallet which I think it’s what you mean you must have access to the M number of keys to able to sign transaction from that wallet and if there is no access to that required number of co-signers you will be permanently locked out of that wallet.

The recovery works like this:

To recover the wallet first seed phrase: you need its seed phrase plus the master public keys (xpubs) for both the second seed phrase and the third seed phrase

Then to recover the second seed phrase: you need its seed phrase plus the xpubs of the other two seed phrases (first and third in this cases) 

Their seed phrase recovery: you need its seed phrase and then the xpubs of the other two seed phrase (first and second in this case)

And then you the script type, derivation Path and address scripts too; in this case 2-of-3 multi sig with the correct
 address scripts type.

That’s why you need to have each other XPUBs backed up with the seed phrases you’re backing up.

If you cannot recover the minimum number of signers for that wallet like In this set up 2 seed phrase recovered then you cannot sign and broadcast transactions from that wallet

As I wrote earlier:


In other words Playw3.com is a White Label provider. You go to: https://playw3.com/partners you choose the casino name and in a minute you have a ready casino - the name you chose is the subdomain. Yes, that's it, the casino is ready.

Since Playw3.com is a White Label provider, I understand that all casinos under them (as subdomains) operate under their license. I'm just not sure whether Playw3.com also provides the bankroll for them, but it seems so.

This is the old template and I will make sure it will be updated today!
We are no KYC ofcourse, never asked for identification before and never will.

Did anybody expected that the losses this quarter will increase by 53.9%? Nobody, and that's what will happen next quarter. I mean nobody will know if this quarter's losses will have an effect on the market for this 4th quarter.

Well, it seems like investors are now more intelligent nowadays that they aren't getting affected negatively by these kind of news. We've seen hacks from Bitget, Liquid Network and others, but the market barely moved at all. It's not like what's happening years ago where investors are reacting whenever they see news like these. I don't know if it will go up though, but if it will, it's not because of these hacks. It's counter-intuitive if it works like that.

$1.26 Billion? Yes, it's huge money, but it doesn't have any effect at all, and it not having any effect towards the market doesn't mean that we will go bullish already. It's just that, the market isn't reacting to it, and if it reacts, it will be for different reasons and not because of these hacks or whatever it is.

I wouldn't want to hit my hand in the chest that we've seen the bottom of bitcoin price whether for the rest of the year or for the rest of the countdown of this cycle.
And perhaps this last quarter of the market is very much hopeful that price will rise further with after the $75,000 support level in September and how Price's had been dangling around the horizon of $80,000 with an average that's likely to break the resistance for a new level of $90,000.
I see that price may definitely fall but in due time at its uncertainty because, rise and fall is part of its volatility attributes which is being manipulated by demands and supplies.

I don't think you will find it anywhere, the problem is that DEXs use liquidity from individuals who put funds in limited liquidity pools.
For some altcoins, there is indeed high liquidity, but it can also be drained or removed.

Even if you could make it through the coding you mentioned, I think it's still ineffective because of the factors I mentioned above.

For example, there is the following scenario: When you manage to create the feature with the coding you intended. Then you set a stop-loss at a certain price, but it turns out that the liquidity cannot support your volume, then your tool will be useless.

---

---

Huh... do you want to predict the future? Lol

You're right, we have crossed that stage where the market will react negatively and cause any FUD. Investors are no longer bothered about whether there's any negative news because if we look at recent months, there hasn't be so much liquidation from big investors. The market holds strong support so I don't think we will see another bottom that will fall below the previous bottom. The bear season is not intense like it was during the beginning when the market was continuously reacting negatively. The market has been positive at least in the past one month which mean that the bear season could be heading towards the end since there is no much selling pressure that would have caused the price to start another bearish movement.

Stop loss had been working for CEX perfectly. But I don’t believe it’s possible to implement stop loss like CEX. Based on liquidity and sell pressure, the DEX token price depended. So there needs to be something that will work as a middle decider when dumping that will help to sell, like, smart contract.

But it won't be an easy process, and probably that’s why DEX hasn’t been implemented by developers. At least I am not aware of any such system there. On the other hand, how about the holders who have been holding funds in a non-custodial wallet?

The question why is there no major crash after this in fact this same quarter has been the best for the past one year now with a bitcoin price increase of over 40% in last quarter alone. The reason why there is no significant drop of price even with crisis like this can be said to be based on two factors

1. The market is used to all this kind of news and investors are no longer panic when situations like arises again, for example the totality of this losses is not even more than the $1.5B loss in bybit hack last year and the market still didn’t make any major reaction.

2. Second reason could be that because the incidents do not happen at once at least it had a day interval for someone incident and week for major ones which might have actually contributed to less panic that could have affected the market

You could look at this from a different angle.

In plain numbers, these losses won't have a significant impact on the market as a whole. It is all still relatively small compared to the total crypto market cap.

If we assume that $1.26 billion get dumped, the effect should be very small, absorption of those coins be quick and prices probably don't really move.

But what about the message that every single successful hack sends to the broader public? Those who have been full of skepticism are less likely to change their mind about a technology that seems to be getting hacked frequently. I know it is not the "technology" and banks get hacked too, but I am talking about those who have a blurry picture of crypto and overevaluate negative news while denying to go down the rabbit hole at least a little bit. These news are "evidence" enough for them to stay away. When banks get hacked, it usually isn't made public because the affected bank prefers to compensate for the financial being done instead of suffering from reputational damage when those incidents are made public.

It doesn't work the same way for those crypto exchange hacks because people quickly notice large movements on the blockchain.

Haven't we already pass that stage? If there was any FUD spread in course of these hacks, the shake off has already happened and the market has already eaten up the volume that the weak hands have sold. I doubt there's going to be any after effect, the price of Bitcoin will not still go below the supposed all time low of this bear season. If the market will dump again to the previous low, it might be caused by something else but not these hacks again.