Last update: 2026-06-27_Sat_22.18h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

Crypto Library receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Crypto Library
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "Crypto Library" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66883244 (unedited backup) (by BTC FutureKing) (scraped on Sat Jun 27 22:15:19 CEST 2026) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:

Quote from: Bityar on Today at 09:38:59 AM
Historical win for Ireland and it wasn't their full strength team, guess 5 regular were missing which makes it more memorable win.

For India, don't mind losing them in bilateral as long as they are working with their combination and experimenting. Although I do feel they were bit complacent yesterday when chasing.
Definitely it was a historical wind for the Ireland team no one has expected that the Ireland team will going to win in this match because we know that the Indian team is the strongest team right now especially in T20 format.
But unfortunately we didn't see any good performance from  the Indian bowlers and as well the better did the worst performance and that is why we saw the disaster situation of the Indian team in this match. And I think there is lots of people that also the lost in their betting on this match. Now I am being more confused about the next match that the Indian would be able to recovery ? Or lose the series?
India bowling was very weak in the match and especially their death bowling was failed completely especially as krishna give 27 runs in a single over anyways if we see which is the leadership or the captaincy of Indian team. No doubt shreyas iyer is good player and a best captain as if see his performances in ipl but why the management remove surya from the captaincy  as he have recently win more trophies for the team yes up and down came in the cricket but removing from captaincy was unbelievable anyhow India will have next match on 28 and I think they will easily win the match if they utilize the players according to their role .
This time India defeat surprised everyone, that too against Ireland because Ireland is a minor team in front of a strong team like India but India lost by a big margin.India has the ability to cross the target of 182 but they showed weakness in both batting and bowling.Opening batsman Abhishek Sharma from India did his duty well but due to the weak partnership of the rest of the batsmen they will fail to collect 182 runs. You are absolutely right.Sometimes even the strong teams can face defeat.If that is the case it does not seem appropriate to change the captain.let see whether India shows its strength in the next match or not.



2. Post 66881371 (unedited backup) (by Bityar) (scraped on Sat Jun 27 11:39:01 CEST 2026) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 06:46:26 AM
Historical win for Ireland and it wasn't their full strength team, guess 5 regular were missing which makes it more memorable win.

For India, don't mind losing them in bilateral as long as they are working with their combination and experimenting. Although I do feel they were bit complacent yesterday when chasing.
Definitely it was a historical wind for the Ireland team no one has expected that the Ireland team will going to win in this match because we know that the Indian team is the strongest team right now especially in T20 format.
But unfortunately we didn't see any good performance from  the Indian bowlers and as well the better did the worst performance and that is why we saw the disaster situation of the Indian team in this match. And I think there is lots of people that also the lost in their betting on this match. Now I am being more confused about the next match that the Indian would be able to recovery ? Or lose the series?
India bowling was very weak in the match and especially their death bowling was failed completely especially as krishna give 27 runs in a single over anyways if we see which is the leadership or the captaincy of Indian team. No doubt shreyas iyer is good player and a best captain as if see his performances in ipl but why the management remove surya from the captaincy  as he have recently win more trophies for the team yes up and down came in the cricket but removing from captaincy was unbelievable anyhow India will have next match on 28 and I think they will easily win the match if they utilize the players according to their role .



3. Post 66881174 (unedited backup) (by Publictalk792) (scraped on Sat Jun 27 09:53:31 CEST 2026) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 06:46:26 AM
Definitely it was a historical wind for the Ireland team no one has expected that the Ireland team will going to win in this match because we know that the Indian team is the strongest team right now especially in T20 format.
But unfortunately we didn't see any good performance from  the Indian bowlers and as well the better did the worst performance and that is why we saw the disaster situation of the Indian team in this match. And I think there is lots of people that also the lost in their betting on this match. Now I am being more confused about the next match that the Indian would be able to recovery ? Or lose the series?
This loss hurts more due to the situation. For the first time in international cricket Ireland defeated India with five of their main spinners fit. For India, it is even more difficult to swallow. The bowling was in a mess. Prasidh Krishna gave away 27 runs in one over and ended up at 0 for 57, it is unacceptable at this stage. Decision of giving Rana and Arshdeep front start in powerplay resulted in India not having right end of innings bowlers later. 2nd T20I at June 28 could be a comeback, but it will require some changes in the Indian bowling lineup.



4. Post 66881117 (unedited backup) (by Bigjoe33) (scraped on Sat Jun 27 09:08:25 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 06:35:57 AM
Cape Verde… they qualified for the knockout stage. This is truly a big achievement for them and they did this by holding all the matches they played to a draw. Uruguay are out of the World Cup after they lost to Spain, they only manage to get two points in this tournament after two draws against Cape Verde and Saudi Arabia.
Unfortunately, I think that Cape Verde's World Cup journey will be limited to the next round because Cape Verde's next opponent is Argentina, whom we know as the defending champions. And besides, Argentina is in another good form in their history, so it is almost impossible for Cape Verde to achieve a victory against Argentina or take advantage of the opportunity.

However, Argentina will have to overcome some struggles to achieve this against Cape Verde because their goalkeeper is performing exceptionally well, which is why they have been able to do so even against strong teams.

At least, you realize that it's not gonna be a work over match for Argentina. According to you, if they draw together, I believe Argentina wouldn't see the match as easy as you are seen it. Like you said, cape Verde is a good side, at least in this world cup tournament, they have done really well. Of course, that doesn't match there strength to the defending champions of the tournament, buy at least, they would fight for the next round.

I just like looking at football from the angle of fighting for your win. I don't see any match ot team as a complete win over any before the game. So, I still feel it's a match that can be contested, and if cape Verde pulls off a strange performance, then it's a normal thing that happens I'm football



5. Post 66881112 (unedited backup) (by rojan) (scraped on Sat Jun 27 09:06:49 CEST 2026) in How to beat wagering bonus in casinos? Any strategy?:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 07:01:43 AM
In fact, where the result depends on luck, how can you beat the wagering requirement? That too where the wagering requirement ranges from 15x up to 40x.

So I think that fulfilling the wagering requirement, even in the case of a bonus, will only be possible if we have good luck while gambling. Moreover, I don't think it will ever be possible through any strategy or trick to make it possible to wager up to 15x or 40x and still have some funds left. It's only possible when your luck is extremely good, so there is no  way to beat that.
I mostly agree. Luck is a big factor because there's no strategy that can eliminate the house edge and that can guarantee that you'll survive a wagering requirement of 15x–40x. I wouldn't say there is no chance of improving one's odds, however. Playing the games with high RTP. Playing a game that has 100% of your wagering, avoiding high volatility games. And playing with small, consistent bet sizes can make your bankroll last longer. These do not count towards the wagering requirement. But can make it more achievable. However. Ultimately it is still a matter of luck whether you make a profit from the rollover or not.



6. Post 66877557 (unedited backup) (by Webetcoins) (scraped on Fri Jun 26 09:14:08 CEST 2026) in Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod]:

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 25, 2026, 08:13:47 PM
The way Sri Lankan team started losing wickets from the beginning, I thought they would not be able to go very far, but Dinesh Chandimal and Dhananjaya de Silva were able to create resistance there and because of them I would say that Sri Lankan team is currently close to 250 runs, now let's see how far Sri Lankan team can go with the remaining four wickets. My personal opinion here is that Sri Lankan team will finish their first innings within 320 runs in this match, I don't think they will be able to go much further than that. On the other hand, since this is not their home ground, they will not be able to take extra chances here.
The beginning of the match was completely favourable for WI, but 4th and 6th wicket partnerships brought SL to make a strong comeback in this first day's play. Now WI, who are playing without Shai Hope, needs to keep things on balance.

SL got a good bowling attack, this can restrict WI, but today the first session could be interesting.

Sri Lankan captain Dhananjaya led his team from the front and scored a century with good support from Chandimal and Dinusha.



7. Post 66873818 (unedited backup) (by eaLiTy) (scraped on Thu Jun 25 08:53:49 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 23, 2026, 06:47:39 PM
~
But I would have been happiest until the last minute if Ronaldo had scored a hat-trick today. I hope he can score another in the remaining 10 to 15 minutes.
I also wished to see Cristiano Ronaldo scoring a hat-trick in that match. In the final few minutes, Rafael Leão who came on as a substitute could have passed the ball to Cristiano Ronaldo, but he went for the goal himself. There were other opportunities as well to complete the hat-trick but most of the time, the ball was passed too wide to make a good connection. Overall, it was a good performance by Portugal, and if they perform like this, CR7 fans will be happy as well.  Smiley

Quote from: Fivestar4everMVP on Today at 03:30:49 AM
~
I am not surprised anyway because south Korea isn't known to be a great football playing nation though I was expecting them to at least score a goal against South Africa, but maybe the reason they didn't score was because too many goals didn't come to the match and the only one that came had already been taken by South Africa.
South Korea is a footballing powerhouse in Asia. They are ranked 25th in the world while South Africa is ranked 60th, so thinking that South Korea is not a great football playing nation is just strange. Players like Son Heung-min who played for Tottenham and Kim Min-jae who plays for Bayern Munich, are in this team.

There were tactical blunders by South Korea, as they benched Son Heung-min, who was not even in the playing eleven. South Africa scored the goal through a counter-attack, which was expected since South Korea dominated the possession and left their defense open whenever they attack.

Quote from: Fivestar4everMVP on Today at 03:30:49 AM
So this win for South Africa simply means they have qualified for round of 32 while south Korea lost that qualification. So south Africa will be playing against Canada next, can they beat Canada? Well, definitely possible but I don't think it will happen.
South Korea is not technically out of the tournament. The 8 best third-place teams out of 12 will advance for the next round, so they must wait for the remaining group matches to finish to see if they qualify.



8. Post 66869209 (unedited backup) (by Hypnotizer) (scraped on Tue Jun 23 23:13:55 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 08:38:18 PM
Alright a satisfying match has been ended and there was another match has to go right now.

Ronaldo also gave a cool reply to his critics that thinks he’s finish and he’s the problem of the Portuguese national team…

Quote
The match between England and the Ghana already started and after 35 minutes currently we don't see any score from the England even they were trying again and again with the aggressive mode of their attacking form but unfortunately at the last moment they were failing to score.

With the way England has been attacking and playing I’m really surprised England wasn’t able to score any goal yet and none in the first half, because it’s a Really disappointing thing for the Ghanaians even though we know the English team is better than the Ghanaian team but zero shots in an entire first half? That’s very poor.

Quote
But I think if they can continue like this then they will definitely be able to score in the first half or the second half and go ahead. I understand that Ghana will not be able to do anything other than play defense in this match. Ghana's attacking form is bad but their defense form is good, which is mainly why England is not able to score.

Unfortunately for them they couldn’t score in the first half but I think the second half would be kinda exciting and England would probably score to win this match but Ghana’s defense has been good in the first half and if they should defend this good in the second half this game might take a different turn…




9. Post 66865286 (unedited backup) (by abaeze) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 21:37:01 CEST 2026) in Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?:

Quote from: Brizi5000 on Today at 05:41:37 PM
Even this is true that for the DCA investment you have to be a sufficient income where you will also easily run your living expenses and then a short portion from that you could also invest in DCA investment.

However, having sufficient income does not mean that we have to earn five or four thousand a month. Even if someone's income is $400 a month and if he wants to, after deducting all his expenses, then he can invest in Bitcoin as DCA, that is also possible because in my country, those who earn $400 a month also have savings of five thousand taka at the end of the month and from that they make a fixed deposit in the bank. I think it is much better to invest in Bitcoin with a long-term strategy, at least for four years, rather than making a fixed deposit in the bank. And even if he invests $30 to $40 in Bitcoin on a weekly or monthly basis, I think that small amounts will eventually turn into very large amounts.
You have good point sufficient income never been mean your earning is in 4 figures or more in many cases peoples are have enough chance of doing good with small earning because they understand their requirements and also able to stay into good system which keep them to have done savings for long run.
I personally know few peoples those are not in crypto or Bitcoin but they done good job with small earnings and now lviing good life while here in Bitcoin its surely needed good strategy for having saving in DCA becasue in some cases peoples needs emergency funds this always pain but if they can manage this could be good and helpful in long run but always needs to understand how this will works.
What you need as a Bitcoin investor is discretionary funds and to know how to buy, if you don't have a sufficient income but you can manage to squeeze out some discretionary funds to buy Bitcoin that is a smart strategy. No doubt money is very important to buy Bitcoin but you don't need to have sufficient money to start and buy, you can buy with amount that you are comfortable to give away so that you wouldn't put yourself under pressure. Having sufficient income is not all that you need as a Bitcoin investor, you need to have determination to do DCA strategy so that you can be encouraged to be accumulating when the discretionary funds is available. If you have sufficient income and discretionary funds but you are not determined to do DCA strategy even with your available funds you will not priotize buying Bitcoin.

If your income isn’t sufficient enough to a point where you cannot be able to sort out your basic needs first can you still go ahead and buy bitcoin? The answer is simply No. let’s not forget that this discretionary income is the money left with us after we are done sorting out our basic needs. An individual who is struggling to meet up with his day to day basic needs probably as a result of insufficient funds would you still advise such person to invest In bitcoin, the advise should be for him to find a way to improve his income so that he can sort out his basic needs and then have a left over cash to invest comfortably.
Since Bitcoin is more effective as a long term investment, meeting your basic needs like foods, clothes, shelter, good health and education should always come first. Investing in a volatile asset like Bitcoin before securing those necessities is not a sensible decision. Another thing I would add is that the same rules do not apply to everyone when it comes to investing in Bitcoin. Some people have an extra income of $200 per month, some have $2,000. Therefore, the amount of investment in Bitcoin should also be determined according to the person's income, risk taking ability and financial goals. It is more important to invest consistently by maintaining a balance between your income and expenses than to invest a lot of money. Also, to be successful in the long run, it is more important to maintain your financial discipline than to invest a lot of money.



10. Post 66865177 (unedited backup) (by BTC FutureKing) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 21:07:38 CEST 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:

Quote from: Publictalk792 on Today at 08:27:00 AM
I am not expecting many changes in the next 15 months. There can be some unexpected inclusions because of excellent domestic/IPL stats but most of them are set till the next ODI WC. The Indian talent pool is so big that they can even have different teams for different formats as we have discussed over and over, thanks to IPL to bring unknown talents into the picture.
It is actually true that the Indian cricket team is currently the strongest team even if we talk about all formats, they will remain the best team. As you said, the Indian talent pool is actually very large, like the total population. And in this regard, a popular tournament like the IPL has played a major role in helping India select their best squad.

Previously, we did not expect any other team to stand against Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, but now it has become so that when all the other teams including the above three teams face the Indian team, it becomes difficult to win. Even in most cases, we have seen them lose. So I think next world cup would be also very good experience for Indian
Comparisons of Australia, however, are interesting. For decades Australia was the standard and still are in Test cricket but it is clear that India have passed them in white ball cricket. That change took place over time, and IPL played big role in the change. But one thing I would state about next ODI World Cup tournament cricket is not two team cricket. On paper India can win without sweat but there is much of knock out pressure. They have been lucky with good teams and an early return home before. Being at bottom is their best chance, but that is not promise.
Australia and India are considered to be the strongest teams in cricket formats.India has no competition because only Australia is stronger than India in Test matches while India is number 1 in both T20 and ODI.I always praise the Indian team because it is a team that neither comes under pressure from anyone nor is easily defeated.In my opinion India is the only team that wins even impossible matches which is India's specialty.After that if anyone can beat India it is the Australian team.Their performance is also amazing.And let me tell you that India is considered the strongest team in the T20 format.



11. Post 66864987 (unedited backup) (by Cgrexp) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 20:06:25 CEST 2026) in Trading is like more like gambling if...:

Quote from: Findingnemo on Today at 02:37:21 PM
One may not possess excessive analytical skills and still can trade like not a gambler, they just need a common sense and strong with the basics of trading, which is buy low and sell high. Learning about trading skills and strategies are good and you can always watch others not to do what they are doing but to learn from their mistakes because those are the lessons that keep us from loss while learning the valuable lessons about trading.
In my personal opinion those people who are doing the trading even they don't know about the analysis like the technical analysis and the fundamental analysis still doing trading by following others their actually doing the gambling not the trading and these are the people who were saying that trading is also like the gambling.

Just as in other sectors like graphic designing and web designing, web development, and software development, you have to grow your skills over time and then become successful through experience, similarly in trading, it takes a lot of time to acquire analysis skills. Those who can give this time can basically express themselves as real traders and can remain profitable, and in their case, trading can basically be considered as a career, which is definitely not gambling.

I am just saying one can be profitable in trading with just buy and sell high strategy and obviously it is not going to work for someone who is looking for short term profits, but for the long term it should work and with higher capital for trading they can make a decent amount of returns just by setting the goal price and execute the trade when it met.

However if one started pursuing trading as a career then it is mandatory to learn everything that is there for them to give better picture of the market movement.
Consistent profits from trading are not guaranteed. The market may fall or rise more than we expect. Therefore, capital management and risk control are important. Choosing trading as a profession is very risky. Therefore, if someone trades only with the hope of profit without knowing about risk management and strategies, then the possibility of loss is high. Even an experienced trader can be damaged due to a small mistake. Therefore, considering these aspects, long-term investment is a relatively easy and realistic strategy for everyone compared to trading.



12. Post 66864928 (unedited backup) (by disbil) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 19:52:31 CEST 2026) in Holding is better than trading:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 11:17:35 AM
When we invest in Bitcoin, we can make a profit most of the time if we hold it for the long term, this is the main truth, but if we do not take our strategy correctly and invest in Bitcoin, then it is possible to face a loss here too. Even many people I know have faced losses, in their case, the matter is that a major part of their income was invested in Bitcoin, but later when the price of Bitcoin decreased and due to lack of backup funds, the emergency situation had to be handled by selling the amount invested in Bitcoin at a loss.
So even if we are investing on the bitcoin we should make a solid strategy for the long term investment it shouldn't like be that because of the bitcoin is the most trusted coin we should invest all of our fund in this, Remind that popular says don't put your all eggs in one basket.
I am not fully agree with your opinion about possibility we can make profit for long term investment in bitcoin, you need hard patience waiting for bitcoin raise up to higher price and require year by year exactly if investment during bitcoin reach highest price. For me trading most worth it accumulate much profitable than long term holding because you can't predicting yet how many years ago must waiting for bitcoin will raise higher price.

Better take profit as much as possibility around 2 until 5% in short moment probably for daily day or weekly than you must waiting for several years later, if comparison with daily day profitable earn trough trading and keep accumulate months by month I believe without one years you can earn up to 100% until 300% profit than have to be long term holder but not guarantee with how many years require waiting for.



13. Post 66864886 (unedited backup) (by Brizi5000) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 19:41:38 CEST 2026) in Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?:

Quote from: Ishicryptic on Today at 01:14:12 PM
Even this is true that for the DCA investment you have to be a sufficient income where you will also easily run your living expenses and then a short portion from that you could also invest in DCA investment.

However, having sufficient income does not mean that we have to earn five or four thousand a month. Even if someone's income is $400 a month and if he wants to, after deducting all his expenses, then he can invest in Bitcoin as DCA, that is also possible because in my country, those who earn $400 a month also have savings of five thousand taka at the end of the month and from that they make a fixed deposit in the bank. I think it is much better to invest in Bitcoin with a long-term strategy, at least for four years, rather than making a fixed deposit in the bank. And even if he invests $30 to $40 in Bitcoin on a weekly or monthly basis, I think that small amounts will eventually turn into very large amounts.
You have good point sufficient income never been mean your earning is in 4 figures or more in many cases peoples are have enough chance of doing good with small earning because they understand their requirements and also able to stay into good system which keep them to have done savings for long run.
I personally know few peoples those are not in crypto or Bitcoin but they done good job with small earnings and now lviing good life while here in Bitcoin its surely needed good strategy for having saving in DCA becasue in some cases peoples needs emergency funds this always pain but if they can manage this could be good and helpful in long run but always needs to understand how this will works.
What you need as a Bitcoin investor is discretionary funds and to know how to buy, if you don't have a sufficient income but you can manage to squeeze out some discretionary funds to buy Bitcoin that is a smart strategy. No doubt money is very important to buy Bitcoin but you don't need to have sufficient money to start and buy, you can buy with amount that you are comfortable to give away so that you wouldn't put yourself under pressure. Having sufficient income is not all that you need as a Bitcoin investor, you need to have determination to do DCA strategy so that you can be encouraged to be accumulating when the discretionary funds is available. If you have sufficient income and discretionary funds but you are not determined to do DCA strategy even with your available funds you will not priotize buying Bitcoin.

If your income isn’t sufficient enough to a point where you cannot be able to sort out your basic needs first can you still go ahead and buy bitcoin? The answer is simply No. let’s not forget that this discretionary income is the money left with us after we are done sorting out our basic needs. An individual who is struggling to meet up with his day to day basic needs probably as a result of insufficient funds would you still advise such person to invest In bitcoin, the advise should be for him to find a way to improve his income so that he can sort out his basic needs and then have a left over cash to invest comfortably.



14. Post 66864430 (unedited backup) (by BigTarget) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 17:40:20 CEST 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 21, 2026, 08:43:11 PM
It is actually true that the Indian cricket team is currently the strongest team even if we talk about all formats, they will remain the best team. As you said, the Indian talent pool is actually very large, like the total population. And in this regard, a popular tournament like the IPL has played a major role in helping India select their best squad.

Previously, we did not expect any other team to stand against Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, but now it has become so that when all the other teams including the above three teams face the Indian team, it becomes difficult to win. Even in most cases, we have seen them lose. So I think next world cup would be also very good experience for Indian
Indian white-ball format is having drastic internal challenges too many skilled and technically superior batsmen are appearing in domestic level this also increasing problems for selectors because they need only 15 players things are getting interesting for future but surely it's going to be great competition for having spot in national teams.

But, now they needed to be have some changes in mindset as well because having only batting pitches are not going to be helpful for them needed good supporting pitches as well because these will help them in SENA countries with things are still not good for them to have consistent performance like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma in all conditions.



15. Post 66864204 (unedited backup) (by Findingnemo) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 16:37:25 CEST 2026) in Trading is like more like gambling if...:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 01:48:54 PM
One may not possess excessive analytical skills and still can trade like not a gambler, they just need a common sense and strong with the basics of trading, which is buy low and sell high. Learning about trading skills and strategies are good and you can always watch others not to do what they are doing but to learn from their mistakes because those are the lessons that keep us from loss while learning the valuable lessons about trading.
In my personal opinion those people who are doing the trading even they don't know about the analysis like the technical analysis and the fundamental analysis still doing trading by following others their actually doing the gambling not the trading and these are the people who were saying that trading is also like the gambling.

Just as in other sectors like graphic designing and web designing, web development, and software development, you have to grow your skills over time and then become successful through experience, similarly in trading, it takes a lot of time to acquire analysis skills. Those who can give this time can basically express themselves as real traders and can remain profitable, and in their case, trading can basically be considered as a career, which is definitely not gambling.

I am just saying one can be profitable in trading with just buy and sell high strategy and obviously it is not going to work for someone who is looking for short term profits, but for the long term it should work and with higher capital for trading they can make a decent amount of returns just by setting the goal price and execute the trade when it met.

However if one started pursuing trading as a career then it is mandatory to learn everything that is there for them to give better picture of the market movement.



16. Post 66863886 (unedited backup) (by Ishicryptic) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 15:14:14 CEST 2026) in Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?:

Quote from: Bitcoin_Budha on Today at 10:13:33 AM
Even this is true that for the DCA investment you have to be a sufficient income where you will also easily run your living expenses and then a short portion from that you could also invest in DCA investment.

However, having sufficient income does not mean that we have to earn five or four thousand a month. Even if someone's income is $400 a month and if he wants to, after deducting all his expenses, then he can invest in Bitcoin as DCA, that is also possible because in my country, those who earn $400 a month also have savings of five thousand taka at the end of the month and from that they make a fixed deposit in the bank. I think it is much better to invest in Bitcoin with a long-term strategy, at least for four years, rather than making a fixed deposit in the bank. And even if he invests $30 to $40 in Bitcoin on a weekly or monthly basis, I think that small amounts will eventually turn into very large amounts.
You have good point sufficient income never been mean your earning is in 4 figures or more in many cases peoples are have enough chance of doing good with small earning because they understand their requirements and also able to stay into good system which keep them to have done savings for long run.
I personally know few peoples those are not in crypto or Bitcoin but they done good job with small earnings and now lviing good life while here in Bitcoin its surely needed good strategy for having saving in DCA becasue in some cases peoples needs emergency funds this always pain but if they can manage this could be good and helpful in long run but always needs to understand how this will works.
What you need as a Bitcoin investor is discretionary funds and to know how to buy, if you don't have a sufficient income but you can manage to squeeze out some discretionary funds to buy Bitcoin that is a smart strategy. No doubt money is very important to buy Bitcoin but you don't need to have sufficient money to start and buy, you can buy with amount that you are comfortable to give away so that you wouldn't put yourself under pressure. Having sufficient income is not all that you need as a Bitcoin investor, you need to have determination to do DCA strategy so that you can be encouraged to be accumulating when the discretionary funds is available. If you have sufficient income and discretionary funds but you are not determined to do DCA strategy even with your available funds you will not priotize buying Bitcoin.



17. Post 66863353 (unedited backup) (by welovebit) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 12:28:49 CEST 2026) in WPL Prediction & Discussion Season -1(2023):

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 21, 2026, 10:12:30 PM
To be honest because of the continuous poor performance of the Bangladesh women team accept the first match I thought that they will also lose against the Pakistan women team, and that become more when I saw the Bangladesh women team score is only 122run and I thought that the Pakistani women batters will easily chase this score but unfortunately we so more disaster performance from the Pakistani women team.
In this regard, two players from the Bangladesh women's team played an extraordinary role, and credit goes to them the most today one is Sanjida Akter Meghla and another is Nahida Akter
Politics brings Pakistani cricket on lowest level I am not expecting any improvement from them because they are falling down badly with this lost against Bangladesh w now most chances they will be also lost against Netherlands w as well because their batting is crap just Fatema Sana giving her 100%.
Peoples those are taking care never have skills of coaching at any level but they are enjoying in England with Pakistan w team and watching their worst Bangladesh w have good improvement with needs more work to be done because now changes are happening and they needs to work on increasing players skills and consistency this will give them good success in the future.



18. Post 66863303 (unedited backup) (by Bitcoin_Budha) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 12:13:38 CEST 2026) in Does the DCA strategy inspire newbies to invest?:

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 21, 2026, 09:35:52 PM
Even this is true that for the DCA investment you have to be a sufficient income where you will also easily run your living expenses and then a short portion from that you could also invest in DCA investment.

However, having sufficient income does not mean that we have to earn five or four thousand a month. Even if someone's income is $400 a month and if he wants to, after deducting all his expenses, then he can invest in Bitcoin as DCA, that is also possible because in my country, those who earn $400 a month also have savings of five thousand taka at the end of the month and from that they make a fixed deposit in the bank. I think it is much better to invest in Bitcoin with a long-term strategy, at least for four years, rather than making a fixed deposit in the bank. And even if he invests $30 to $40 in Bitcoin on a weekly or monthly basis, I think that small amounts will eventually turn into very large amounts.
You have good point sufficient income never been mean your earning is in 4 figures or more in many cases peoples are have enough chance of doing good with small earning because they understand their requirements and also able to stay into good system which keep them to have done savings for long run.
I personally know few peoples those are not in crypto or Bitcoin but they done good job with small earnings and now lviing good life while here in Bitcoin its surely needed good strategy for having saving in DCA becasue in some cases peoples needs emergency funds this always pain but if they can manage this could be good and helpful in long run but always needs to understand how this will works.



19. Post 66863011 (unedited backup) (by Publictalk792) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 10:27:01 CEST 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 21, 2026, 08:43:11 PM
I am not expecting many changes in the next 15 months. There can be some unexpected inclusions because of excellent domestic/IPL stats but most of them are set till the next ODI WC. The Indian talent pool is so big that they can even have different teams for different formats as we have discussed over and over, thanks to IPL to bring unknown talents into the picture.
It is actually true that the Indian cricket team is currently the strongest team even if we talk about all formats, they will remain the best team. As you said, the Indian talent pool is actually very large, like the total population. And in this regard, a popular tournament like the IPL has played a major role in helping India select their best squad.

Previously, we did not expect any other team to stand against Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, but now it has become so that when all the other teams including the above three teams face the Indian team, it becomes difficult to win. Even in most cases, we have seen them lose. So I think next world cup would be also very good experience for Indian
Comparisons of Australia, however, are interesting. For decades Australia was the standard and still are in Test cricket but it is clear that India have passed them in white ball cricket. That change took place over time, and IPL played big role in the change. But one thing I would state about next ODI World Cup tournament cricket is not two team cricket. On paper India can win without sweat but there is much of knock out pressure. They have been lucky with good teams and an early return home before. Being at bottom is their best chance, but that is not promise.



20. Post 66862436 (unedited backup) (by Furious 7) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 03:53:25 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Crypto Library on June 21, 2026, 09:00:50 PM
Time was running out and the score was still unchanged. I think it's going to be goalless until the end because apart from Belgium not being able to find their stride at the moment Iran are also struggling to make the most of the numbers on the pitch at the moment.

It's a hard thing to accept because I thought being in an almost easy group Belgium had a greater chance of qualifying but 2 games and 2 draws is really a downfall for the current Belgian squad.
Even though this is one of the leading teams but it seems that for now Belgium's performance is decreasing even though their squad cannot be said to be ordinary for player material.
Exactly as I said, it is going to happen, after three minutes have passed, now the remaining 5 minutes have been added and more than half of that time has passed, still no team is showing the expected performance, but Belgium is trying to attack again and again, but here again, Iran's defense is performing very well, due to which they are failing again and again. However, in the end, Iran played defensively but played amazingly today, especially the Iranian goalkeeper who was there, worked as an amazing savior for Iran.

But in the end, I will say that this match was full of excitement, and when there is excitement, the match is enjoyable.
But I don't really agree with your words for the previous post because for me Iran was not really able to take advantage of the momentum even when superior in number of players so the draw was very good but not if this ended up for Iran's victory because they were even difficult to keep up and only focused on defense even though it was very worthy of appreciation.

This match is very interesting but as a bettor and looking at Belgium's probabilities I am actually disappointed with what they did in these 2 matches but their chance to stay in the next phase can still be obtained in the last match.

The other match in Group B is happening right now and New Zeland is ahead at half time thanks to Fin Surman's 1 goal in the first 15 minutes.
If New Zeland can keep this up then they could be one of the clubs that qualify for the next phase but I think this match will most likely end in a draw.



21. Post 66861909 (unedited backup) (by taufik123) (scraped on Sun Jun 21 23:54:31 CEST 2026) in When gambling addiction has become tougher than drug addiction.:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 09:12:53 PM
-snip-
Even I know people who were not addicted to drugs, but later, when they got involved in gambling and lost a lot of money, they went from depression to drug addiction.
Drugs only become an outlet when they lose gambling, to relieve depression and hope they can control everything.
Even though this will be a heavier addiction phase.

Gambling depends on the player himself, if the goal is to make money with a small capital and continue to bet and play intensely endlessly,
this would be a bad indication that gambling will eventually get rid of people like this and become heavy addicts without any strategy.

Especially when dealing with illegal casinos that are unclear how their Audits are conducted and the RTP is unfair and is even set up for the defeat of the user, with no winnings at all.

Many real examples occur that initially just because gambling turns into a drug addict, this will have worse side effects if you don't have control and a clear purpose why gambling,
just want instant riches from gambling is the goal of a lazy person.



22. Post 66861872 (unedited backup) (by Furious 7) (scraped on Sun Jun 21 23:46:07 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 09:00:50 PM
Time was running out and the score was still unchanged. I think it's going to be goalless until the end because apart from Belgium not being able to find their stride at the moment Iran are also struggling to make the most of the numbers on the pitch at the moment.

It's a hard thing to accept because I thought being in an almost easy group Belgium had a greater chance of qualifying but 2 games and 2 draws is really a downfall for the current Belgian squad.
Even though this is one of the leading teams but it seems that for now Belgium's performance is decreasing even though their squad cannot be said to be ordinary for player material.
Exactly as I said, it is going to happen, after three minutes have passed, now the remaining 5 minutes have been added and more than half of that time has passed, still no team is showing the expected performance, but Belgium is trying to attack again and again, but here again, Iran's defense is performing very well, due to which they are failing again and again. However, in the end, Iran played defensively but played amazingly today, especially the Iranian goalkeeper who was there, worked as an amazing savior for Iran.

But in the end, I will say that this match was full of excitement, and when there is excitement, the match is enjoyable.
The match did become very interesting despite Belgium being down to 10 men but no goals were scored in this match making the result not as good as I expected from a bet.
Belgium had a lot of chances in this match but Iran were quite focused in their defensive scheme from the start.
With this result the chances of Belgium and Iran still remain especially for now the world cup format is quite favorable even though they are in 3rd place so hope still remains.

But Beiranvard worked hard in this match and I think he will be the MOTM because with the onslaught of Belgium he remained calm under the bar and there were even some good saves he made in this match.



23. Post 66861697 (unedited backup) (by Furious 7) (scraped on Sun Jun 21 22:57:25 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Merit.s on Today at 08:43:29 PM
And currently another negative news for the Belgium team and that is Nathan Ngoy one of their good defencer receive the record from the referee. I think now it's going to more harder for the Belgium to win even I think this match could be also a draw.
IfIran plays their card very well, they should be able to win the game instead, of ending it as draw. This is because short one is a good advantage for the Iranians but Belgium has immediately, made a substitute and bring in a defender in other for them to play a defensive game to stop Iran from penetrating their defense for a goal.
Time was running out and the score was still unchanged. I think it's going to be goalless until the end because apart from Belgium not being able to find their stride at the moment Iran are also struggling to make the most of the numbers on the pitch at the moment.

It's a hard thing to accept because I thought being in an almost easy group Belgium had a greater chance of qualifying but 2 games and 2 draws is really a downfall for the current Belgian squad.
Even though this is one of the leading teams but it seems that for now Belgium's performance is decreasing even though their squad cannot be said to be ordinary for player material.



24. Post 66861644 (unedited backup) (by Merit.s) (scraped on Sun Jun 21 22:43:32 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: Crypto Library on Today at 08:35:50 PM
And currently another negative news for the Belgium team and that is Nathan Ngoy one of their good defencer receive the record from the referee. I think now it's going to more harder for the Belgium to win even I think this match could be also a draw.
IfIran plays their card very well, they should be able to win the game instead, of ending it as draw. This is because short one is a good advantage for the Iranians but Belgium has immediately, made a substitute and bring in a defender in other for them to play a defensive game to stop Iran from penetrating their defense for a goal.