Hi!

Indeed, this is not a but issue, more important than the ticker is the name of the project, which Aurcoin you ask me even the name is too generic and also "coin" in the name is outdated, we are in 2025. For a strong project you need an unique, easy to remember name, and last a ticker which is not taken, as @psycodad suggested is a good move, will denote professionalism, meaning you guys did at least a bit of research.

This is my two cents. Anyways, good luck with your project!

I don't think its a big problem. Anyways ticker can be finalized later.

This is excellente and I like your craft to have pulled this out of the tin air.

Your expression is absolutely on the path of the greeny land...sope pur!

"Do your own research" this is the summary of everything and it's so concise!

I am not opposed to some paper bitcoin for either beginners and/or for those who have most of their investments in various kinds of products (such as retirement funds) that might not allow for self-custody.  Also, some institutions and/or governments might have difficulties self-custodying, so paper bitcoin might be mostly acceptable for them, even if they might have to figure out ways to attempt to transition into having some control and/or oversight over the ways that the coins are custodied - perhaps even trying to custody with custodians who engaging in some kinds of credible auditing (proof of reserves), and even having abilities to move coins between custodians could keep a decent number of the custodians honest (to the extent that we can have any confidence in quite a few aspect of our smoke and mirror status quo financial institutions and systems that seem to operate on spin, convolution and obscurity).


I had just glossed over the ICD code part, and so yeah, since you are emphasizing it, I had to look it up...  I asked the internet, what is ICD code, and I got the answer that it relates to International classification of disease.. wow!!!..

It is starting to become more and more known that the fiat and even the debt systems are problematic for society as a whole, yet there might not be ways to completely divorce ourselves from such already existing systems, since even in current times, we have debt systems being built up around bitcoin, so there are attempts to build the same problematic and abusive systems around bitcoin, which may or may not end well for various folks, and bitcoin was likely built to withstand some of these kinds of attacks, yet at the same time, the resolution and even the victory of bitcoin remains far from certain.

Even worse, I had to look up: ICD-10 code C80.1, and I got this:

"ICD-10 code C80.1 - stands for "Malignant (primary) neoplasm, unspecified," which is used when a cancerous tumor is diagnosed but the primary site cannot be determined."


That is true.

It seems that previously, the more obvious assessment would have had been that the ETF participants would move directionally the same as the BTC price, but instead, it seems that we have one class of bitcoin newbies taking value from another class of bitcoiners.

I am not sure if that is a proper assessment, even though surely, it does seem that certain folks are becoming more interested in bitcoin, whether they intend to dump on us later down the road or not, they are still seeming to garner more and more of the bitcoin wealth, and it is not direct ownership of bitcoin, either.


hahahahaha.

Without context, that reminded me of the old commercial from the 70s. 

https://www.facebook.com/theflyervaults/videos/life-cereals-mikey-likes-it-commercial-from-1974/159445322176606/

"paper btc" lolz

ICD10 code C80.1

I've been a staunch supporter of post parity for quite a while now