Last update: 2025-05-08_Thu_22.54h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
coupable receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. coupable
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "coupable" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 65357253 (unedited backup) (by Mahanton) (scraped on Wed May 7 23:59:01 CEST 2025) in Financial education begins from home.:
As a child, no one explained to me how to properly deal with the income that came in. That you should not spend it all within a certain period of time. You should put aside some part or, better yet, invest this money.
That's why it's considered a privilege for a child to learn the tools and skills to manage a budget, no matter how small. These methods are supposed to be learned theoretically in the early years of school, and then learned practically by observing family members (parents and siblings) and performing tasks using small amounts.
Indeed. Teaching them at their young age may not be appreciated by them for now, but when they grow old, they will know how to value such a thing. That is why I don't make my kids' lives too easy. I give them enough money only for their basic needs. It's up to them if they will save some or not. Guiding our kids is not just making them suffer difficulties, but it is a way of helping them to become responsible in the future. They may not understand it, but soon they realized how important it was.
You shouldn't make the task difficult for you as parents and for your child as well, in a way that might deprive him of enjoying the best times of his life (childhood without responsibilities). Your role as a parent is to teach your child to take some responsibility, not to force it on him. Your idea of motivating the child to save from his daily poketmoney is very good, and I am sure that you will see positive results in the short term. In other words, you don't have to wait for him to grow up to see the results of your support. I encourage you to continue your support and you will see the results happen in front of your eyes like magic. Don't forget to make the mother aware of this as well, so that the task becomes a shared responsibility.
There are many rich poor who want the success of their child but company matters a lot because every person consume good and bad things from society and if they will spend more time with financially educated people then they will be more successful in life ans also execution matters a lot because you can face challenges in life. There are point of view about rich and poor person and every person has different perspective.Parents want big position of their child because child need money to survive but they should start work at early age and should be independent before 18 age then our country will grow more . Because new entrepreneurs will take advantage from the market.
There's no parent that would be wanting for their kids to be struggling in terms of financial aspects and this is why we do thrive and doing our very best on establishing and making our current business to become bigger, not only just that we can give out the good life that they do deserve but rather having something on which they could inherit at the time that you do pass away. We parents had nothing to wish for other than on having our kids to have a progressive and successful life. Each parent will be having their own ways on how they will be handling or teaching up their kids on which there are those who are strict on implementing and there are ones who are just that too loose. Speaking about Financial education then this is something that starts or begins from home but with those just simply basic principles on how its being handled or managed out but of course it will be still basing up on the age of your kids because if they cant be able to understand because they arent matured enough then it will be that pointless on doing so. Therefore, as a parent then you should be that watchful on whats happening or the current condition whether its already the right time to make out such lessons into their kids or will be waiting up for the right time to come through.
2. Post 65357215 (unedited backup) (by hafiztalha) (scraped on Wed May 7 23:44:31 CEST 2025) in Financial education begins from home.:
As a child, no one explained to me how to properly deal with the income that came in. That you should not spend it all within a certain period of time. You should put aside some part or, better yet, invest this money.
That's why it's considered a privilege for a child to learn the tools and skills to manage a budget, no matter how small. These methods are supposed to be learned theoretically in the early years of school, and then learned practically by observing family members (parents and siblings) and performing tasks using small amounts.
Indeed. Teaching them at their young age may not be appreciated by them for now, but when they grow old, they will know how to value such a thing. That is why I don't make my kids' lives too easy. I give them enough money only for their basic needs. It's up to them if they will save some or not. Guiding our kids is not just making them suffer difficulties, but it is a way of helping them to become responsible in the future. They may not understand it, but soon they realized how important it was.
You shouldn't make the task difficult for you as parents and for your child as well, in a way that might deprive him of enjoying the best times of his life (childhood without responsibilities). Your role as a parent is to teach your child to take some responsibility, not to force it on him. Your idea of motivating the child to save from his daily poketmoney is very good, and I am sure that you will see positive results in the short term. In other words, you don't have to wait for him to grow up to see the results of your support. I encourage you to continue your support and you will see the results happen in front of your eyes like magic. Don't forget to make the mother aware of this as well, so that the task becomes a shared responsibility.
There are many rich poor who want the success of their child but company matters a lot because every person consume good and bad things from society and if they will spend more time with financially educated people then they will be more successful in life ans also execution matters a lot because you can face challenges in life. There are point of view about rich and poor person and every person has different perspective.Parents want big position of their child because child need money to survive but they should start work at early age and should be independent before 18 age then our country will grow more . Because new entrepreneurs will take advantage from the market.
3. Post 65355626 (unedited backup) (by G.Seed) (scraped on Wed May 7 15:27:49 CEST 2025) in C'soir à Barbès un bal y est donné La Zoubida voudrait bien y aller!:
Il n'y a pas d'intellectuel dans ma liste.
- BHL : a fait fortune dans le bois africain (exploiteur, fauteur de guerre)
- Julien Dray : payé avec mes impôts (parasite)
- Zemmour : journaliste payé par des médias subventionnés, donc avec mes impôts, puis politicien financé par des mafieux juifs (source : Marco Mouly lui même escroc juif qui nous a volé des milliards) et directement par mes impôts.
- Fabius : politicien payé par mes impôts (responsable mais pas coupable, comme il dit)
- Finkielkraut : payé par des médias subventionnés donc par mes impôts pour cracher sur la France.
Des gens payés des fortunes, et qui n'apportent rien à la France, sinon "se tromper", d'après toi.
Et d'après moi, oeuvrer aux intérêts de leur "Israël" et contre le Christ (comme l'a dit Zemmour).
Tu veux des intellectuels qui défendent nos intérêts :
_ Laurent Ozon
_ Hervé Ryssen
_ Alain Soral
_ Vincent Reynouard
...
4. Post 65350911 (unedited backup) (by BitHodlers) (scraped on Tue May 6 03:28:55 CEST 2025) in $243M bitcoin scam that led to kidnapping and chaos:
A fool and his money are soon parted, justice seems to be served in this case. It is clear to me that the majority of people are incapable of handling the amount that they have regardless of whether they are poor or rich. What makes this worse, is that easy money tends to make weak people even worse.
The best kind of money, is one that is gained through hard work and appreciated by a smart and thoughtful person.
The mistakes these kids made were extremely naive and somewhat stupid, and perhaps if there was a senior person among them capable of managing them, they would not have been exposed in such a ridiculous way.
It is disappointing that they managed to execute this theft, when their skills are low and their stupidity is very high.
5. Post 65350456 (unedited backup) (by dunfida) (scraped on Mon May 5 23:15:37 CEST 2025) in People don't want to hear truth but you are poor :
There are people who lives With the three thousand and those people are not poor for the countries you mentioned, because of the way they manage themselves, and they are some people who will live under poor with that, so therefor everything that happens is base on our management in our house hold, maintenance is the most important something so far, because once you maintain your life and manage it too well you will not get poor when you are receiving 3k dollars
As for OP, he didn't define poverty as he intended. I still can't understand how $3,000 can represent the level of poverty in European countries, as he indicated in his example. Europe's economies are considered prosperous compared to most countries in the world, but doesn't that mean this amount doesn't provide a good life far from poverty? In a country like Ukraine (before the war), $3,000 a month is considered very good and provides a life of semi-luxury, closer to wealth. The same amount in Switzerland represents less than the average salary, given that the GDP per capita is very high.
Making up some examples without even trying out to tie up on whats the actual numbers on real time happening is just that a bad example but to assume out that context on what OP is trying to say in regardless about on which country that we are talking into then it all pertains about into those who are recieving that salary on which it includes into the poverty side on which it makes someones life status to be that sitting on the harder side. We do know that each person is different when it comes into their life conditions in regarding on their job and side income on which living will be that very challenging getting in line on affected by inflation on which it do make things even more harder.
For the word about having that contentment then it will be that up to you whether you do look for things to make yourself be more better in terms on making income or you would be that just contented on where you are now.
6. Post 65345079 (unedited backup) (by AB de Royse777) (scraped on Sun May 4 15:29:31 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] 1Win International Sig. Campaign | Instant Payout | Fair & Transparent:
Week#26 post count has been completed and you will get paid soon. BTC rate @ $96,170.00 (it's the opening rate today on Binance)
"Forum
User" "New Posts
on ANN" "Historical
Posts" "Total
Posts"
vd309 552 1
sana54210 1 8,019 23
robelneo 2 15,045 24
Mate2237 4 4,951 39
coupable 2 4,916 25
Josefjix 2 3,849 25
Shinpako09 1 4,740 26
darxiaomi 1 4,028 33
batang_bitcoin 5 18,629 30
Mr. Magkaisa 2 3,361 32
bitzizzix 4 8,023 38
24 76,113 296
On the
🔵1win discussion topic, we had 24 new contribution. We were able to crate 296 new Signature banners for 1Win and total 76,113 signature banners were displayed all over the forum.
Cheers,
7. Post 65344655 (unedited backup) (by Swordsoffreedom) (scraped on Sun May 4 13:16:50 CEST 2025) in Trump 100 Day Mark: Voters Disappointed on Economy:
While some people are saying that it's too early to start analyzing and criticizing Trump's 100 days in office, i find it worthy of criticism because when a government starts badly, there is every tendency they can also end badly. Not just even up to a year and complains and regrets are already flying at every angle and contrary to things he promised during his campaign speeches, everything is just becoming clear that he deceived voters and they have every right to be angry towards the way things are going. What was even his plans for causing a tariff war that also worstened the economy, he didn't do well in his 100days in office and that is just the obvious.
All politicians who use the 100-day plan to embarrass their opponents in power. I don't recall any politician who came to power achieving anything during their first 100 days. Discussing this period aims to embarrass the authorities, not to draw logical conclusions necessary to resolve the current crises. This is why i find it useless to judge any president in this period.
Biden has been praised more in his first 100 days in office for his achievements in controlling the pandemic , economic recovery and a more open foreign policy...According to some reports at the time, more than 50% of Americans supported him. Meanwhile , Trump's approval rating is at a record low due to his tougher and more aggressive policies.
I don't know what the tradition of giving a review after 100 days means for the US and they do this every year with new presidents . But I agree that these assessments are quite useless because each presidential term lasts up to 4 years and there is still a lot of time, the current assessments are more political .
8. Post 65344004 (unedited backup) (by pooya87) (scraped on Sun May 4 08:04:43 CEST 2025) in India vs Pakistan:
The reading could be completely reversed. That is, it can be concluded that China is pushing for this war to weaken India's capabilities so that it does not become a competitor, enabling it to become an alternative. I also do not believe that China will sacrifice its position as the world's factory just to preserve its friend Pakistan, which it supports to limit India's capabilities in the region.
It would be true if it were India versus anybody else like Bangladesh (which they do have conflicts with). But when it is Pakistan it becomes less likely (not impossible though).
Apologies to people of these two countries, I'm just analyzing not justifying but as a matter of fact Bangladesh would be the perfect choice for China because despite good relations and investments, it is not as strategically important. On top of that with Myanmar a mess filled with various terrorist groups, it would be easy to inject weapons and militia into Bangladesh border with India and cause similar border clashes that have happened in the past.
Not to mention because unlike Pakistan, Bangladesh doesn't have nukes such conflict can indeed escalate and be prolonged. In contrast, any clash with Pakistan has a higher chance of being short because they both have nukes.
As for the new trade route, I have heard about it for some time, which calls for trade to take a route through the Arabian Gulf, passing through Israel and Turkey, to reach Europe. None of the countries along the route would object to being placed on the global trade route, including Iran itself, whose influence would expand as a result, given its control of the Arabian Sea. This would also facilitate its access to global markets.
Just some clarification:
The Persian Gulf (the southern shores of Iran on the other side of which are a handful of teeny tiny Arab dictatorships) is what Iran fully controls.
The Arabian Sea (basically west of Indian Ocean) is what Iranian allies like Yemen would exert their control over specially when it enters Gulf of Aden.
As for Arab-Med, its incentive was trade but its objective was legitimizing the occupation of Palestine and the terrorist regime occupying it. The route was also basically from India to Arabian Sea then entered Oman Sea to reach UAE, then from land entered Saudi usurped Arabia then Jordan then occupied Palestine to enter Mediterranean sea to enter Europe.
Turkey and other Arab dictatorships was actually in no part of that plan nor was the Persian Gulf.
As I said that plan is completely dead because it had Israel in it and it was the only reason why it existed in firs place; and most importantly it needed to go through Gaza. The Zionist occupiers of Palestine not only were incapable of taking over Gaza despite the destruction and genocide but are now globally despised making such "normalization" moves impossible.
Not to mention that Israel project is already over and this organization's days are numbered. We are witnessing the last years of the Zionist regime.
9. Post 65341543 (unedited backup) (by laijsica) (scraped on Sat May 3 17:17:07 CEST 2025) in Bitcoin critics weren't wrong:
Ultimately, the broader question may be whether Bitcoin’s value proposition as a store of value or hedge against inflation outweighs the issues it faces in terms of practical adoption for everyday transactions. Perhaps, for Bitcoin to truly fulfill its original vision, it needs to tackle its scalability issues, improve usability for everyday consumers, and address the environmental impact — but those are big hurdles to clear.
In my opinion, using Bitcoin solely as an investment product, making it more of a speculative instrument than a store of value, has harmed the concept of Bitcoin as defined by the Satoshi Protocol more than it has helped it spread. With the increasing difficulty of mining, which has become a costly industry, and the rise of alternative currencies, the use of Bitcoin as a payment system has declined, and its use has been limited to a few specific tasks. Without overcoming some obstacles, bitcoin may remain a mere investment asset far from becoming the practical everyday currency that satoshi has initially envisioned.
The balance between maintaining decentralization and security on the one hand, and improving efficiency and adaptability to daily needs on the other, remains a significant challenge that may determine Bitcoin's future as a leading cryptocurrency, or simply as a store of value.
If you are here in this market, it is up to you how you will look at this investment. If you can still gain profit or not, because let us admit the fact that bitcoin is a digital currency where volatility factor is still a major consideration in going to this market. There are pros and cons like any other investment, now, it is on you if you can bear those pros and cons and use it to your advantage. Up until now, the volatility factor is the major reason why many satoshi holders are considering it as investment. Once stability is achieved, I believe, we will see more of btc in the payment sector.
Is Bitcoin price stability really necessary? If someone were to ask me this question in the context of Bitcoin, I would say that the beauty of accumulation and holding Bitcoin is its volatile value. You may disagree with me and want to compare it to other investments, but I consider Bitcoin investment differently and a store of value as one likes to think of it. Yes, Satoshi considered Bitcoin as an investment and at the same time he took a stand against fiat dependence and Bitcoin has become a store of value. Despite being a digital currency, Bitcoin can be considered more than that because many countries have moved ahead in terms of adoption and also to hold Bitcoin as a strategic reserve.
Various companies in Russia are already utilizing Bitcoin to pay for international trade. Other countries of the world may also start utilizing Bitcoin to pay for international trade in the same way, in which case the volatility of Bitcoin may not have any effect.
10. Post 65341127 (unedited backup) (by pooya87) (scraped on Sat May 3 15:12:37 CEST 2025) in India vs Pakistan:
Trump wants to transform India into the world's factory as an alternative to China. Therefore, the United States clearly supports India, and within this plan, it will change the global trade map by establishing a new trade route through the Gulf region to Europe, as an alternative to the maritime route through the Red Sea (Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Suez Canal).
If that's the plan, it won't work if US regime manages to start a war between India and Pakistan. The moment that war begins, capital will start fleeing India. All the investment, the manufacturing, etc. will be at risk and the oligarchs will start moving their capital to "safety". Meaning US won't be able to turn India (aka the country at war in that scenario) into world's factory to replace China.
China also don't want that because they are investing in Pakistan and their investment will be at risk if war were to break out. And most importantly, armed conflict would prevent their BRI plans.
As for the trade routes, all US plans have already failed. To be specific they failed on October 7, 2023 because of Operation al-Aqsa Storm. The trade route plans (commonly known as Arab-Med) was completely canceled after that.
Not to mention that US has no power or control in any of the sea routes you named. The Persian Gulf is in full control of Persia aka Iran (that includes Makraan sea leading to Indian ocean) and the rest which is Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, Bab al-Mandeb strait and Suez Canal is controlled by Iranian allies namely Yemen. They won't be able to establish any form of trade route while simultaneously threatening Iran.
My understanding is that the US regime's plan is not war but only destabilization of Pakistan.
My reason is the increased terrorist attacks in Pakistan over the past couple of months. For example just today the separatists attacked Kalat town in Pakistan's Balochistan province and took 10 hostages.
Last month the Pakistan's Masroor Airbase thwarted a terrorist attack. If I'm not mistaken some nukes are stored in this base.
Before that the terrorist group named Balochistan Liberation Army attacked a train, took 214 hostages and they executed them all in one day.
... and so on.
This is a destabilizing trend.
11. Post 65340301 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 10:01:07 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
It's just a hypothesis and a 'what if' question. The address I shared in my previous post is an actual address that the exchange generated for me where I should deposit my bitcoin if I wanted to do a swap. I am asking OP where would I get the keys to that address.
When you exchanged on EXCH, did they also give you the private key of your deposit address?
eXch has nothing to do with CCE.Cash or this discussion. I know why I am asking the questions I am asking. eXch didn't claim it was a non-custodial and decentralized exchange. CCE.Cash says it is. I am asking OP to explain how it works. If it's non-custodial, I am asking where the keys are to the deposit addresses. If it's decentralized, I am asking how to perform swaps when the website is offline and how to connect P2P to other market participants. According to OP, transactions are conducted directly between two parties. Meaning, I (the buyer) am connected directly to the seller. I want the OP to explain how that connection works if the CCE.Cash service is down?
This is what I asked fixedfloat, and their answer is decentralized trading! According to your understanding of decentralization, do you think they are? They are all exchanges, not centralized or decentralized. So the question you asked the original poster is meaningless, because it is obviously not a decentralized exchange, nor centralized, and all exchanges on the market are just exchanges. Any exchange on the market can say that it is decentralized or centralized, but you don’t think so, because this is an obvious mistake! ! They are just an exchange, there are a lot of them on bestchange!
12. Post 65340124 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Sat May 3 08:54:25 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
It's just a hypothesis and a 'what if' question. The address I shared in my previous post is an actual address that the exchange generated for me where I should deposit my bitcoin if I wanted to do a swap. I am asking OP where would I get the keys to that address.
When you exchanged on EXCH, did they also give you the private key of your deposit address?
eXch has nothing to do with CCE.Cash or this discussion. I know why I am asking the questions I am asking. eXch didn't claim it was a non-custodial and decentralized exchange. CCE.Cash says it is. I am asking OP to explain how it works. If it's non-custodial, I am asking where the keys are to the deposit addresses. If it's decentralized, I am asking how to perform swaps when the website is offline and how to connect P2P to other market participants. According to OP, transactions are conducted directly between two parties. Meaning, I (the buyer) am connected directly to the seller. I want the OP to explain how that connection works if the CCE.Cash service is down?
13. Post 65340063 (unedited backup) (by asarfiar) (scraped on Sat May 3 08:23:19 CEST 2025) in India vs Pakistan:
Sorry, I've mixed up some information. I provided information from an unreliable and inaccurate source. I did a quick search to find different information, and there isn't consistent data across all sources. This
source states that Pakistan is the 12th largest power in the world, but all sites agree that India is militarily ahead of Pakistan.
Those lists mean absolutely nothing, the data they use is just too raw and the "strength" they talk about is just on paper. In reality things are very different. Take the situation in the Red Sea, Yemen is not even in the list and yet they've already defeated US military there!
Take airforces of India and Pakistan.
On paper Pakistan has a smaller number of aircrafts and is counted as weaker. In reality is is actually stronger compared to the Indian airforce. Pakistan has better pilots and the PL-15 beyond visual range air-to-air missiles would do wonders in air-to-air fights. And that's just one of the factors. With better trained pilots that PAF has actually invested in a lot over the years, they will have an easier time gaining air superiority.
You're right. However, this approach can make doubt on all statistics, as the numbers can be easily manipulated, significantly impacting the true ranking of a country's military capabilities. This ranking is compiled according to precise criteria, but it is practically inaccurate, as whoever has the largest number of tanks does not necessarily mean they will win a tank battle against a smaller force.
I remember the Vietnam War, when resistance militias, armed with simple traditional weapons, succeeded in defeating Japan, France, and the United States, relying on combat experience and individual skills.
If we consider it overall, then some of the most polluted political leaders in India give the war the beginning of the war between the two countries. In India, Hindus are torturing the Muslim people of India, Hindu religions are demolishing mosques. Some states are killing Muslims in some states And IndianLeaders of political parties say we will destroy Muslims like Gaza In an independent country, the small community is not yet able to live with security, I think it is a shameful event now.
In terms of harmony and sectarianism, I think China will support Pakistan because India is the cause of political, economic and Indian border abuse. In order to overcome this violence, India and Pakistan must be bound by establishing the foundation of a compromise and a peace within the borderThe medium of the contract must be created.
14. Post 65339767 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 05:03:01 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
Either you're part of the service team or you just want to spread nonsense. Although your writing style is very similar to OP's, I'll assume good intentions and invite you to re-read OP's comments, as he is an official representative of the platform and confirms that the service is decentralized and doesn't require KYC. I don't know how you compared it to Exch, but be assured that Exch didn't gain credibility overnight and don't attack community members who express their thoughts and honest opinions about the service. I also think it's better to help OP provide answers to community questions if you're convinced about the service rather than attacking those with ideas you don't like.
Don’t you think it’s ridiculous to give the private key of the deposit address? Has EXCH done this?
I am just a spectator, and I have also been defrauded by platforms that require KYC. I have posted about it in scam posts, you can go and have a look. I have no reason to help anyone or not, I just think your attack and difficulty are a bit bullshit, purely commenting and adding experience everywhere
Or have you, the so-called advanced forum users, never used exchange services? I have never seen any exchange service provider on the market that requires the private key to be given to the user. Whether it is EXCH, changenow, fixedfloat, changelly, "easybit that cheated me out of money", or any exchange provider on bestchange
15. Post 65339758 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 04:57:25 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
Either you're part of the service team or you just want to spread nonsense. Although your writing style is very similar to OP's, I'll assume good intentions and invite you to re-read OP's comments, as he is an official representative of the platform and confirms that the service is decentralized and doesn't require KYC. I don't know how you compared it to Exch, but be assured that Exch didn't gain credibility overnight and don't attack community members who express their thoughts and honest opinions about the service. I also think it's better to help OP provide answers to community questions if you're convinced about the service rather than attacking those with ideas you don't like.
Don’t you think it’s ridiculous to give the private key of the deposit address? Has EXCH done this?
I am just a spectator, and I have also been defrauded by platforms that require KYC. I have posted about it in scam posts, you can go and have a look. I have no reason to help anyone or not, I just think your attack and difficulty are a bit bullshit, purely commenting and adding experience everywhere
16. Post 65339653 (unedited backup) (by Cryptocurrency hipsters) (scraped on Sat May 3 03:13:31 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?
Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.
Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.
I don't know if you are posting nonsense or playing dumb? This website is just a simple exchange. There is no centralization or decentralization. It is just a simple exchange. The exchange with a good reputation in the whole forum is EXCH. Isn't it just an exchange? You deposit money to EXCH, and EXCH sends you the coins you need. You said that EXCH will give you the private key for the deposit? It is also ridiculous to ask who to contact for exchange when some websites are offline. It means that a website will close down and run away immediately after collecting your money. Do they really need to do this? Wouldn't EXCH be like this when it just started? How did they guarantee it?
17. Post 65339565 (unedited backup) (by hafiztalha) (scraped on Sat May 3 01:51:01 CEST 2025) in India vs Pakistan:
Sorry, I've mixed up some information. I provided information from an unreliable and inaccurate source. I did a quick search to find different information, and there isn't consistent data across all sources. This
source states that Pakistan is the 12th largest power in the world, but all sites agree that India is militarily ahead of Pakistan.
Those lists mean absolutely nothing, the data they use is just too raw and the "strength" they talk about is just on paper. In reality things are very different. Take the situation in the Red Sea, Yemen is not even in the list and yet they've already defeated US military there!
Take airforces of India and Pakistan.
On paper Pakistan has a smaller number of aircrafts and is counted as weaker. In reality is is actually stronger compared to the Indian airforce. Pakistan has better pilots and the PL-15 beyond visual range air-to-air missiles would do wonders in air-to-air fights. And that's just one of the factors. With better trained pilots that PAF has actually invested in a lot over the years, they will have an easier time gaining air superiority.
You're right. However, this approach can make doubt on all statistics, as the numbers can be easily manipulated, significantly impacting the true ranking of a country's military capabilities. This ranking is compiled according to precise criteria, but it is practically inaccurate, as whoever has the largest number of tanks does not necessarily mean they will win a tank battle against a smaller force.
I remember the Vietnam War, when resistance militias, armed with simple traditional weapons, succeeded in defeating Japan, France, and the United States, relying on combat experience and individual skills.
I think there will be no War because that is not time of War because India want to make their economy strong but if War happens then both countries will face many challenges. India is proudy country because that country has big population and they are giving taxes . Indian Prime Minister want to be dominant on Pakistan but Pak army is best army of the World and Indian government tried to defeat Pakistan in the past and that could could not be successful in their mission. If War happens then we will see big crash in the market and people will sell their stocks and stock market will go down.But market is not in control of any person and it could go up but most of the chances that market will go down .
18. Post 65337196 (unedited backup) (by viljy) (scraped on Fri May 2 12:18:31 CEST 2025) in What happened to BRICS nations?:
~
This isn't as easy as you might think. Let me give you an example to help you understand. Take the example of trade between India and Russia, where Russia needs Indian products more than it exports to India. If we try to apply your theory, Russia will either pay in Russian rubles, which will accumulate in Indian banks and leave India with nothing to do with them because no one in the global market would prefer to buy rubles or use ruble in trade. Or it will pay in Indian rupees, which will force it to buy them from the market for dollars. This example actually happened during the initial period of the Ukraine war after international sanctions were imposed on Russia and its exclusion from the Wire system.
It is not entirely true that Russia needs Indian goods more than India needs Russian ones. The first thing that comes to mind is goods that Russia imports from India, probably such as tea or medicines, whereas India buys very cheaply the resources needed by industry. Resources, especially energy, are necessary for any economy. So trading in national currencies is quite viable.
By the way, the role of the dollar is gradually beginning to be reduced to a universal unit of measurement of value, rather than an indispensable unit of account international trade. At the same time, the share of the yuan in the calculations is increasing.
19. Post 65336304 (unedited backup) (by CCECash) (scraped on Fri May 2 04:57:49 CEST 2025) in CCE.Cash is an instant, low-fee, no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanger:
Please note. We have made it clear that if the client does not want to reveal his identity for any reason and refuses to provide documents, the KYC/AML process will be considered a failed transaction and the deposited funds will be returned to the deposit address within 24 hours, minus the network fee. CCE Cash reserves the right to blacklist this address, thereby disqualifying it from online deposits.
I think this is almost fair. I suggest you clarify about this detail in all your channels and even send notifications to already registered users.
Another point worth mentioning which is about refund to the deposit address; i think you should consider ask user for refund address instead of refund directly to the known deposit address. You know that users don't always use their personal wallets to deposit to exchangers. In most cases tgey either send directly from another platform (exchanger,casino,..) which means that they don't own those address and the refund will be sent to the platform's address not user personal address. Some other ask clients to deposit directly to his exchanger address which is the deposited address you gave him. Also the idea won't be practical if the transaction has more than one inputs so you can't know which address you can use for refund.
First of all, CCECash does not support user registration. Registration will expose user information. If the customer does not want to return to the original address, he can contact the online customer service to confirm and return the amount to the user's other address.
Okay, I understand the concept better now.
Regarding the refund address, it's not enough for your explanation to be in the form of an answer to my suggestion here in a forum post. These details are important, and as I've previously explained the risk of refunds directly to the deposit address, they should be clearly stated in the terms of service TOS. This will be helpful to ensure greater transparency and prevent anyone from manipulating the process later.
Personally, I'm still not entirely convinced by your service and still consider your approach to communicating with the community unprofessional. Overall, I hope I'm wrong in my assumptions and that I'm dealing with an honest service. Good luck with all your honest endeavors for the community.
Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to share your concerns. We value transparency and accountability, and your input helps us improve our services and communication.
Great that you value transparency and the good communication with community in different channels. Getting feedback direct from community is a must for any project whose target is to run for long time. In this context, i can ask you again about the name of the domain you used since 2018 and explain how CCECash is a decentralized exchange.
CCECash operates as a decentralized exchange (DEX), and its key features are consistent with the principles of decentralization, but its mechanism is also very different from the traditional DEX model. Here is a breakdown of its decentralization:
1. Non-custodial nature
No fund control required: CCECash does not hold user assets and does not require user deposits. Transactions are conducted directly between users' wallets, ensuring that users have full control over their private keys.
2. Privacy and permissionlessness
No KYC required: Unlike centralized exchanges, CCECash does not require KYC verification, thereby protecting the anonymity of users.
Permissionless access: Users can trade without creating an account, which is in line with the open access principle of DEX.
3. Cross-chain functionality
Direct exchange between wallets: Support cross-chain transactions (e.g., Bitcoin to Ethereum) in a decentralized manner without the use of asset packaging or centralized intermediaries.
4. Hybrid model considerations
Centralized front-end, decentralized back-end: While the user interface (website) may be centralized, the actual exchange process relies on a decentralized protocol to ensure that funds do not pass through CCECash's control.
Main differences from traditional DEXs
No liquidity pool: Unlike Uniswap-style DEXs, CCECash does not use liquidity pools or automated market makers (AMMs). Instead, it routes orders through a decentralized network.
Instant settlement: Focusing on speed and simplicity, instant exchange is usually prioritized over complex order book systems.
20. Post 65335330 (unedited backup) (by yahoo62278) (scraped on Thu May 1 21:22:37 CEST 2025) in CHILE : Need users from Chile to promote the Signature campaign :
Is the casino only available to people from Chile? I don't think I have ever heard of a casino that only allows 1 region to play, not saying it cannot be true just never seen it. Let's assume that's the case though, as coupable just said this is a public forum without a dedicated local board to that specific region. That most likely means that there are not enough users from that region to justify a local board, which could likely mean that your search for users from that region is going to turn up a super small number.
The casino would likely be wasting their money if only looking for users from that area. If more areas are able to play, then it might not be a waste of money with a competent manager.