I don't believe that taxation is the main obstacle to legalize Bitcoin in many countries because some countries have successfully set legislation to tax Bitcoin holdings and daily use with countries recognized bitcoin as a tender asset. In other words, any example can be followed and applied by the government willing to legalizing bitcoin use.
Governments always looking for new activities to apply taxation, but with bitcoin it can't apply taxation because they don't recognize it. Why they delay recognition despite it will generate more revenues from taxation? Simple because of decentralized nature of the blockchain which doesn't allow them to controle everything as they used with Fiat money.

None, unfortunately. I am still with three last cases on batch #2 and all three of them have one or two things missing from their side that need me to reinquire from them, so my contact on BC can handle the transaction. I'll move to your batch next.

Or perhaps you can ask coupable to try and handle your case. He was present in your thread too and he seemed to show a very great interest in questioning my capability and intent in handling BC's fiat cases. He probably can finally get a chance to put words into his mouth and prove his contribution to this section of the forum.

Is there any news..?

[...]

I didn't know you were volunteering out of your good will to help with pending cases because I see you contributing to all the discussions about bc game, so I assumed you were a professional mediator affiliated with the casino team or even a team member.

OP, Sankar02 know that I am doing all of these activities on SA with BC's stuck transaction out of my free time, my good will, and expect exactly nothing in return. Just as I don't expect an unnecessary headache and noises from sources that has zero contribution or relation and importance to the case, who seemingly only add headache to me.

So... I am dropping your case off of my plate. Feel free to find someone who's interested to solve cases out of their own time, with drama included. That said, may I suggest you to get coupable to try to take a look into your matter and perhaps give his best to get your situation resolved? Given he looks very interested in your matter.

The point I am trying to say is, I believe, very much clear. Repeating the same situation while the previous one is still in progress feels like "Let me just try and if I screw up again, I can just use the forum to clear the issue." is it not?

And no, I am not blaming him for his poor choice, though there are other means of withdrawal he can take, fully knowing this one method is problematic. I help so many others who are unfortunate enough to choose this transaction method, and I know and mentioned that batch #3 [OP's batch] will be a special headache given the numbers of stuck transactions each players have and the narrow window we have. Thus, what I have in mind is a question of intent, knowing that there is a chance that his transaction might get stuck due to the merchant issue, yet he's still attempting it. And the last thing I need is most definitely someone adding another transaction on their pile, all while their previous problematic transaction is still unhandled.

But it shall no longer be an issue, I believe.

---

OP, Sankar02 know that I am doing all of these activities on SA with BC's stuck transaction out of my free time, my good will, and expect exactly nothing in return. Just as I don't expect an unnecessary headache and noises from sources that has zero contribution or relation and importance to the case, who seemingly only add headache to me.

So... I am dropping your case off of my plate. Feel free to find someone who's interested to solve cases out of their own time, with drama included. That said, may I suggest you to get coupable to try to take a look into your matter and perhaps give his best to get your situation resolved? Given he looks very interested in your matter.

What do you want to say exactly sir? Do you blame him for not taking a lesson from what happened and chose to withdraw to his bank again? Don't you think that bc game is the one to blame in this situation after credits the OP's account then prevents him from withdrawing using the method he wants and which is supposedly available to him? Is the problem here with bc game system or with the methods OP is trying to use?

The majority of users, including crypto users, has no clue how the AI can be used for illegal purposes. There is no way to stop bad use but to rise awarness about scam methods designed by AI and how much dangerous they can be. Opened discussions like this one is a favor for the community to realize what can Ai be used for, and that the only solution is to be cautious dealing with shady offers.

Good luck sir
And thanku so much for your help i got my money credited in bc game
God bless you and your family 🖤

Ahh, dully noted. Thank you for bringing the deadline to my attention, though I am already very well aware of that, of which I am somewhat sure batch #3 will require me to get a prescription for ergotamine [not joking, I am prone to severe chronic migraine that can only be "fixed" with that prescription-only meds once it occured] as they're full of near-deadline-window.

So... wish me luck.

Iguess it's a mistake made by the dev who wrote 10$ instead of 30€, or their changed the minimum withdrawal value in the Tos without updating the system, or another possibility that they use a template not in accordance with the Tos;

Well, I thought my thoughts were clear. Ok let me explain again; the case of OP is in your queue list of cases which you managed to handle them in batches with your contact from bc game. This means OP has to wait for more time until you reach the batch where his case in.
For disputes with bc game, time counts. In another unsolved case, the user was asked to wait for 60+ days. After waiting for two months, they told him the case becomes too old and that they can't handle it.

My apology, but what exactly the point you're trying to say here or on the other thread? I can't find any that's directed to me nor requiring my response and/or something that I can do beyond my control. If you mind to articulate your post better?

As you are talking about time OP has to wait until his case will be looked, please keep in mind my note that in another accusation thread against bc game, the victim was told to wait many days after providing all document proofs, and already two months passed with no solutions. After 60 days they said that they can't processed with the support because the transaction becomes too old. We become familiar with this kind of bahaviors from bc game. The SA board is already crowded with accusations against it.

These are the kinds of casinos to avoid. At 30 euros, it's already so high for a minimum withdrawal requirement. Judging from what @coupable mentioned, it looks like either the support staff has no idea about what they are talking about or they are just trying to fool around with you.
If they have any profile in this forum, then I will also red tag it once identified.