Time: 57'

Time: 53'

You are right there is no need of worrying yourself when it comes to 1win because 1win Casino is one Casino that has a track record of proven integrity. 1win will not run away with your money so be rest assured that winning prices from other contest from 1win will be surely settled .

Next year promises to be better from 1win because there are allot of contest, games and giveaways that 1win customers will be enjoying.

I think this is a useless requirement because I can fill the page with whatever info about an unknown sender. How would they come to verify those info? It's pathetic that a cryptocurrency exchanger interact with cryptocurrencies like they are a bank using fiat money.

It's clear that those exchangers are very few and that they lost a large base because of those bullshits. I doubt that any licensing providers will require such a dumb thing.

You have nothing to worry about with 1win. maybe a delay of few days but things will take how much time it needs to be done. The contest is continuing and there will be more winners each week.
About the GEO requirement, I guess because of the contest rules. To join the contest, all you are required to do is create a 1win account and you can participate with the ID in the apply post. Some participants had no previous accounts which means they are not 1win active users. They can create an account in 1 minute without completing identity verification process. If one of them wins the contest, the team has to verify if he isn't from a restricted country. This is my explanation and I am not sure if it's the right one or not.

Another important point is that there is no spreadsheet link in the main campaign topic nor in any post later. We, as a community, can't verify anything about how things work in this campaign (number of participants, payout structure, number of posts...). Manager has the right to hide the spreadsheet for whatever reasons, but campaign participants themselves can't follow their activity within the campaign unless manager gave them limited access. This does raise many questions about the promotion model stake wants to persist.

Once the deposit is AML flagged, the user can choose tge option to recieve clean funds besides paying higher fees.
This is a mixing service. Only mixers don't ask for the source of funds. It's even better than the mixing platforms where you send btc and recieve btc which can be traced by blockchain analysis tools. In your platform, the user can receive a completely clean funds in another different assets. I told you those are great news for many thiefs.

I don't blame you how you run your service as you don't offer a method to scam users. But you seems to be ignorant that mixing services aren't allowed to advertise in bitcointalk forum. I think i am not mistaken in my understanding of your concept and waiting for opinions from other members.

Another important point is that there is no spreadsheet link in the main campaign topic nor in any post later. We, as a community, can't verify anything about how things work in this campaign (number of participants, payout structure, number of posts...). Manager has the right to hide the spreadsheet for whatever reasons, but campaign participants themselves can't follow their activity within the campaign unless manager gave them limited access. This does raise many questions about the promotion model stake wants to persist.

Another important point is that there is no spreadsheet link in the main campaign topic nor in any post later. We, as a community, can't verify anything about how things work in this campaign (number of participants, payout structure, number of posts...). Manager has the right to hide the spreadsheet for whatever reasons, but campaign participants themselves can't follow their activity within the campaign unless manager gave them limited access. This does raise many questions about the promotion model stake wants to persist.

Once the deposit is AML flagged, the user can choose tge option to recieve clean funds besides paying higher fees.
This is a mixing service. Only mixers don't ask for the source of funds. It's even better than the mixing platforms where you send btc and recieve btc which can be traced by blockchain analysis tools. In your platform, the user can receive a completely clean funds in another different assets. I told you those are great news for many thiefs.

I don't blame you how you run your service as you don't offer a method to scam users. But you seems to be ignorant that mixing services aren't allowed to advertise in bitcointalk forum. I think i am not mistaken in my understanding of your concept and waiting for opinions from other members.



We would like to clarify that Darken.biz is a currency exchange service, not a mixing service. As mentioned earlier, our platform does not launder funds and does not promote illegal activity. It seems there has been a misunderstanding. We operate as a regulated exchange service and work with exchange infrastructure. In the normal course of operations, clients receive exchanged assets without AML flags, since withdrawals are executed through exchange accounts. This is a standard practice for exchange services and does not constitute mixing. When a transaction is flagged as higher risk, clients are informed in advance of the available options. In some cases, completing the exchange may require additional steps on our side and may involve a higher service fee. The final decision always remains with the client. We do not obscure the source of funds, do not mix user deposits, and do not provide anonymization services. Our goal is to offer clients a transparent, safe, and user-focused exchange process with clear conditions and without freezing funds.
We hope this clarifies the principles and operation of our service.

If I understood well your sentence, when a deposit is flagged as AML suspicions, you offer to exchange it with clean assets. This is even worse than blocking those funds.
This is a great news for everybodies having dirty money to use your service for clean assets. Are the authorities in Russia aware about this gtreat offer?

There are no needs to share with community the name of the bot you are using for AML chacks since it's only for interne management and user deposits are always safe whether they are AML flagged or not.

Go to your profile > Modify Profile > Ignore Boards Preferences > Uncheck "Oбмeнники" > Click the change profile button.

@Darken.Cash
For exchanges that require identity verification, your minimum limits seem very high! Would you mind mentioning the name of the software that's being used for AML checks?

Sorry Bro, when i clic this link, i can see the topic in Russian board. But when i check the post history in OP profile, i can see only this topic here. Is the topic in Russian was moved to Off-topic or whatever? Or they are two different accounts or am I missing something!!
I still can't figure out why he deleted all his post history unless they were all pumping posts. I noticed in the Russian thread that nobody quoted one of his replies ever which means he didn't react at all comments. However he has 17 activities shown in his profile.

I can see this one - Darken.Cash - Cepвиc быcтpoгo и бeзoпacнoгo oбмeнa

Has however had most of his posts deleted. I don't know if they were bumps or other Announcement topics. Also after checking the Russian board, ANN. I think they decided to make a comeback after a couple of years of inactivity.

Adding more languages is not a big deal since they can be added using a free AI tool. If they are targeting only Russian users, why to post this thread at first place? OP seems not to be responsive with feedback.

It's also strange that OP deleted all his previous posts and left only this new thread. Can anyone confirm if the original ANN thread for Darken is still published in the Russian board?

It's Ok with reporting to moderators, but what the reason behind reporting to manager? The manager of stake campaign seems to count posts without checking its quality and this is what makes the campaign a mess of spam.

What makes me doubt about stake managing many accounts in the signature campaign is that they can run a quality campaign with the same set of rules and same budget. However they prefer running the campaign with few good posters and a bunch of spammers. The manager is involved in this scheme but I can't blame him alone.