Last update: 2025-09-13_Sat_18.36h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

coupable receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. coupable
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "coupable" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 65801618 (unedited backup) (by iBaba) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 16:02:37 CEST 2025) in Economic Importance of Cannabis Sativa:

Quote from: coupable on September 11, 2025, 08:28:39 PM
Between that the state need to play a Major role in it production and usage, to avoid illegal use of the cannabis itself.
I doubt that any state can manage this sector perfectly without collateral damages. See the examples of any country producing Sativa, they are all fighting gangs who produce real Cannabis in paralel. You can't control what people plant in their own lands especially if they a get a licence to produce Sativa, they will think about it as the safest way to produce cannabis. Government can't count every leaf in every plant. This is almost impossible

This was proposed in my own country at a point but it never got any good executive or legislative support because their arguments are closely related to what you just mentioned. Cannabis is said to have different economic importance eg. Because of its medicinal value which is used as pain relief, treatment for epilepsy and other cancer treatment supports, it's industrial use in textile, building material, ropes and other biofuels, it can immediately bring about a boost in the revenue generation and attract both local and foreign investor but when you look at the negative effects of it basef of what you already mentioned, my country is already suffering from issues of proper enforcement of public policies and regulations, the abuse of it as hard drugs will immediately increase significantly and the bad eggs in the government especially within the law enforcements agencies will take advantage of that to increase the cost of governance in the name of curbing its misuse. I think its wisdom for the government not have allowed the legalization of Cannabis in my country.



2. Post 65801233 (unedited backup) (by Roseline492) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 14:25:43 CEST 2025) in Economic Importance of Cannabis Sativa:

Quote from: coupable on September 11, 2025, 08:28:39 PM
I doubt that any state can manage this sector perfectly without collateral damages. See the examples of any country producing Sativa, they are all fighting gangs who produce real Cannabis in paralel.

Since is going to become very common the management of it is going be less effective because so many would be using it for different things, is actually because of regulations some countries do not want it because they don't trust the compliance of the people they're ruling in terms conforming to the regulations they would give, so is actually what you had said about Sativa regarding how a place usually results if they allowed it because with gang stars reproducing it, it will from there and results another thing that would lead to more problem in the country, actually if not for the negativity in might cause it would have been a good thing since a lot of people consider it helpful in terms of herbs



3. Post 65800773 (unedited backup) (by Dunamisx) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 11:47:55 CEST 2025) in Economic Importance of Cannabis Sativa:

Quote from: Ojima-ojo on September 11, 2025, 08:36:05 PM
Between that the state need to play a Major role in it production and usage, to avoid illegal use of the cannabis itself.
I doubt that any state can manage this sector perfectly without collateral damages. See the examples of any country producing Sativa, they are all fighting gangs who produce real Cannabis in paralel. You can't control what people plant in their own lands especially if they a get a licence to produce Sativa, they will think about it as the safest way to produce cannabis. Government can't count every leaf in every plant. This is almost impossible
that is the reason we see that some countries avoid legalizing cannabis for whatever uses, despite it multiple importance role as raw material for medical and other material production, alot of times what the government is borderd about is not the revenue generation of cannabis but the abuse that will come from it processing just like you mentioned.

But despite all these regulations, ban and uses of cannabis, are the common men on the street not taking it, are the production industries not utilizing for manufacturing purposes, are government themselves not making cool money from the seizures of those selling it without their approval, things like this will always happened, because they know how it has been beneficial upon them to boost the economy underground.

Quote from: Ojima-ojo on September 11, 2025, 08:36:05 PM
Over here cannabis abuse have been said to be responsible for several crimes, so the government treat it like every other drugs, so banned outrightly.

What of alcohol, is it not intoxicating, they wouldn't have allowed for the people to sell and buy liquor as well, isn't alcohol used in the production of some drugs, are people not drinking to stupor, maybe they only want to be in control of how cannabis is being run, both the buying and selling and also restrict the poor from buying, while the rich are getting access to all these in large quantity because they can afford to.



4. Post 65800723 (unedited backup) (by Ojima-ojo) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 11:24:37 CEST 2025) in Economic Importance of Cannabis Sativa:

Quote from: coupable on September 12, 2025, 07:48:15 PM
Merely looking up Cannabis sativa shows clearly that it has application around a broader scope like textures, building materials, food and medicine. It was funny but yet inspiring seeing that some houses were built using hempcrete from cannabis. Now the question arises as to why countries like mine declare cannabis completely illegal  instead of regulating it's abuse because honestly cannabis doesn't look illegal here as people consume it very well and freely while bribing officials to evade arrest.
I guess you are talking about the condition in your country. Which country it is? Do locals grow cannabis? I understood that your government declred the sector completely illegal, so how the traffic is running? If you have borders with one of the countries producing cannabis, i assume its price is cheapper so the consumption can be that large.
Except for Europe, in every continent we find a country specialized in growing cannabis for drug industry. Just like Afghanistan in Asia and Morroco in Africe. While most of the exports go to Europe because of the quality of consumers.
Regardless of what the approach the government is taking, declaring that sector as total illegal is somewhat not worth, and we should avoid taking such step as developing country, since by so doing we are denying the citizens of the right to quality products that could be generated from cannabis, and not as if if they ban it, that will solve the issues of illegals supply and usage.


You still fine alot of citizens from this countries that ban cannabis consuming and abusing the drug at large scale level, so what exactly is the government banning then?



5. Post 65798863 (unedited backup) (by libert19) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 21:24:31 CEST 2025) in To have kids or not to? Your opinion from economy perspective:

Quote from: coupable on Today at 07:05:21 PM
I like your comment, it's wild to me how much some people are brainwashed by their religions/cultures, you can see some comments in this thread too, I must add, I am no exception to this, but existence of Internet has kept me somewhat open minded.
In eastern societies, and almost in all third tier world countries, we suffered from family agression in a way or another.

Yes, my family too was extremely toxic for my mental health, I am glad for crypto which allowed me to move away from them. Never been more happier.

Quote
...And they give born to children for two main reasons; one is to help for labor work (agriculture and construction) in addition to the security role. Two is as a part of their retirement plan, as children are required to take care of their parents when they will become older until their last moments. Even if this looks normal and logic, but it limits a lot of someone capabilities and ambitions to live independant to his family.

Such parents destroy children's lives, I pity children of such people.

Quote
In our societies, it's shameful for somebody to leave family home and move to another city.

Mine too but it's the only way. I advise people to be self-sufficient, independent, and RUN! You'll be glad you did.

Quote
Girls are in much worse condition than boys, they can't chose but to live with their families brutalities from the house of her father to the house of her husband.

Yes, I do understand that situation that very well, I am male but yes I do understand what you talking about.



6. Post 65796952 (unedited backup) (by Marvell1) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 11:31:31 CEST 2025) in higher profitability vs stability and security:

Quote from: coupable on September 11, 2025, 06:28:47 PM
However, at the moment, I've been making much higher income but I can say that the kind of job I have is never stable and secured, and any time I'll be losing my source of income. And since I am a breadwinner, this got me thinking if I'm actually still on the right track or I should be applying again for a quite stable job despite of low compensation. Now my question is, what really matters, unstable higher income or a stable and secured yet lower income?
It depends on your personal situation. If you are a younger ambitious person whose only responsability is to feed himself and build for a better future, you would definetly choose unstable higher income and take all the risks that come with. While if you have more responsabilities especially people at a certain age range with a family to feed, you don't have better options than to chose a stable secure income even if it's not that higher.

I was going to say the same thing, it will all depend on personal circumstances. We should not give advice carelessly or ask others for advice when we are not in the same situation.

If OP is married and the main breadwinner, advising him to choose a high paying but unstable job that could result in loss of income at any time would not be wise advice. Because think about it, if he is unemployed for months and doesn't have enough money to cover living expenses, how will his family survive? Conversely, that advice is only appropriate if OP is single and willing to make trade-offs for a better future.



7. Post 65796866 (unedited backup) (by libert19) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 10:55:31 CEST 2025) in To have kids or not to? Your opinion from economy perspective:

Quote from: coupable on September 11, 2025, 11:14:15 PM
Alot of criminal who has become a problem to society is as a result of frustration because the people who have birth to them were not fit to take care of their parental duties.
In most countries in the world filled with traditional societies, parents have no limits to treat their children in anyway they think it's right. Some of them think that humiliation, violence, are legit treaties with their children. I love in Islamic culture society and the Islam gave a lot of rules for children to well tteat their parents, but in the opposite there are nothing to garantee the good care. In some holy texts, the prophet advised fathers to hit his children who refuse to pray starting from the age of 10. We today in 21th century living in modern societies should produce strict laws to prevent parents from abusing their powers to manipulate the willings of their children to be independant, including forcing them to satisfy all their needs and only give birth to children he can take care of.

I like your comment, it's wild to me how much some people are brainwashed by their religions/cultures, you can see some comments in this thread too, I must add, I am no exception to this, but existence of Internet has kept me somewhat open minded.



8. Post 65795509 (unedited backup) (by Ojima-ojo) (scraped on Thu Sep 11 22:36:07 CEST 2025) in Economic Importance of Cannabis Sativa:

Quote from: coupable on Today at 08:28:39 PM
Between that the state need to play a Major role in it production and usage, to avoid illegal use of the cannabis itself.
I doubt that any state can manage this sector perfectly without collateral damages. See the examples of any country producing Sativa, they are all fighting gangs who produce real Cannabis in paralel. You can't control what people plant in their own lands especially if they a get a licence to produce Sativa, they will think about it as the safest way to produce cannabis. Government can't count every leaf in every plant. This is almost impossible
that is the reason we see that some countries avoid legalizing cannabis for whatever uses, despite it multiple importance role as raw material for medical and other material production, alot of times what the government is borderd about is not the revenue generation of cannabis but the abuse that will come from it processing just like you mentioned.


Over here cannabis abuse have been said to be responsible for several crimes, so the government treat it like every other drugs, so banned outrightly.



9. Post 65781381 (unedited backup) (by shasan) (scraped on Mon Sep 8 03:25:25 CEST 2025) in Lending Service Started! (BTC/LTC/ETH/DOGE/ETC)!:

Quote from: Dzwaafu11 on September 07, 2025, 08:34:12 PM
45.73 usdt sent.
Received and your repayment schedule should be as mentioned below:
263$: 2025-10-05 (Repayment weekly) Extended for a month by charging 30%
187$: 2025-09-16 (Repayment weekly)
Next weekly repayment should be made on or before 14th August, a minimum 40$.

Quote from: coupable on September 07, 2025, 09:04:32 PM
I sent 28$ interest fee for another month extension which was confirmed via telegram. Rest of due amount remains the same 280$ Will be sent on or before September 28th. I was late posting because waiting for your confirmation in telegram discussion and was in emergency since yesterday. Thank you for understanding.
Our agreement was weekly repayment, but you are not sending weekly, and it is your 3rd extension. So, if you need any more extensions, then you will be charged 30% per month from 29th September.



10. Post 65779932 (unedited backup) (by Fivestar4everMVP) (scraped on Sun Sep 7 19:10:07 CEST 2025) in 🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵:

Quote from: Shinpako09 on September 06, 2025, 09:40:09 PM
Today, it becomes a trend for some brands in the crypto gambling industry to block accounts and suspend withdrawals under the umbrella of delayed/incompleted verification procedures. This would never happen with 1win Global.
Is there? I haven’t been checking scam accusations lately, so I don’t know about this. Maybe those cases are from illegitimate sites that just don’t want to pay out winnings, especially big ones. Of course, that won’t happen with 1win since they’re already one of the reputable and well-known casinos here in the forum. Also, you don’t have to worry about your KYC because it’s protected by 1win, and besides, KYC is a normal requirement nowadays in online gambling.
Different casinos end up having different sorts and types of issues with different customers for various reasons, this does not make the casino less of being reputable most especially when it's not been verified and concluded that the casino is the one that fault or trying to steal from their user..

Some users get angry at a casino after losing badly while playing on that casino, they try to get a refund of their money which is not possible, and as way to get back at the casino, they come up with false accusations against the casino..
There is a dude who does this alot of times though not on this forum but on one local forum here in my country, I advised him a couple of times to stop but he refused, saying he enjoys doing it, this is why not a scam accusations should be taken seriously, especially those without any evidence to prove the case being complained about.



11. Post 65778289 (unedited backup) (by EarnOnVictor) (scraped on Sun Sep 7 10:23:13 CEST 2025) in Coinmarketcap promoting shitcoins:

Quote from: coupable on September 05, 2025, 08:22:42 PM


As you can see from the above image, this is no big deal whether one is set at default or not, you can change yours to what you prefer. This is why it's good to know what you are dealing with before dealing with it. Fine, this could be an agenda, and of course, it could be for money. Still, we can't verify that, and we can't teach anyone how to run their websites.
While you think it's not a big deal, i found it a dangerous tool to promote scams. Afaik binance is the company owner of the cmc website, and this tool would help her promote any shitcoin she accept to list either as a real trending one or as a paid service which is more dangerous. Now i can create a shitcoin and pay unknown exchangers to list it even for a determined period of time let's say not more than five months, then pay cmc to trend it in top trending tab.
Allegation of inaccuracies and doubts in CMC didn't start today. As I said earlier, it's a choice to use coinmarketcap, there are alternatives out there. But if you would be sincere, there is a reason why many people are rushing to it, and I tell you, this "Trending" feature is one of them.

I don't trust any websites, so Coinmarketcap can't be an exception. But is their data useful to me, oh yes, especially this "Trending" feature. This feature helped me discovered $SOMI despite my busy schedule last week. You see, many people will continue to complain, while many others will benefits from what others supposedly called manipulation. This is a fast filtering feature for me, and I won't blame CMC if people do not DYOR after seeing data from them.

Everyone dealing with crypto should learn it first and know the possible propaganda that may happen, otherwise, do not involve in crypto. If you are experienced in crypto, you would know that to know the top and best performing coins/tokens, you need to consider the "Top" feature on CMC and trading volumes elsewhere on the website. "Trending" is not a feature to consider here, it's just a popularity, which lapses in a short time.



12. Post 65777184 (unedited backup) (by Shinpako09) (scraped on Sat Sep 6 23:40:14 CEST 2025) in 🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵:

Quote from: coupable on September 05, 2025, 10:53:20 PM
Today, it becomes a trend for some brands in the crypto gambling industry to block accounts and suspend withdrawals under the umbrella of delayed/incompleted verification procedures. This would never happen with 1win Global.
Is there? I haven’t been checking scam accusations lately, so I don’t know about this. Maybe those cases are from illegitimate sites that just don’t want to pay out winnings, especially big ones. Of course, that won’t happen with 1win since they’re already one of the reputable and well-known casinos here in the forum. Also, you don’t have to worry about your KYC because it’s protected by 1win, and besides, KYC is a normal requirement nowadays in online gambling.



13. Post 65776916 (unedited backup) (by robelneo) (scraped on Sat Sep 6 22:21:13 CEST 2025) in 🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵:

Quote from: coupable on September 05, 2025, 10:53:20 PM
Today, it becomes a trend for some brands in the crypto gambling industry to block accounts and suspend withdrawals under the umbrella of delayed/incompleted verification procedures. This would never happen with 1win Global.

There are topics like that in the scam section. When it comes to KYC, it's better to do it in a more stable and reputable casino I'm not against new or small casinos. Still, they are the ones that are very strict when it comes to implementing KYC, I just forgot the name of the new casino, but they asked their player to stand in front of the street sign where he lived, something that top casinos would not ask of their players.



14. Post 65776783 (unedited backup) (by Charles-Tim) (scraped on Sat Sep 6 21:41:25 CEST 2025) in Coinmarketcap promoting shitcoins:

Quote from: Z-tight on September 05, 2025, 08:44:31 PM
Afaik binance is the company owner of the cmc website, and this tool would help her promote any shitcoin she accept to list either as a real trending one or as a paid service which is more dangerous.
I do not agree. The tokens that purchased the CMC boost are displayed in a different color, i believe that is enough 'warning' to anyone interested in it that the token is not organically visible at the top, but is being boosted to the top through payments made to CMC. I know that some greedy people would ignore common knowledge like this, but it should otherwise be easy to understand.
A lot of newbies will not know what you know. I will agree with the people that says Binance will use Coinmarketcap to do something like promoting shit coins. Top coins was the default before on Coinmarketcap but now trending coins. That is kind of shady. They want people to more exposed to shit coins that are full of bump and dump.



15. Post 65776282 (unedited backup) (by bangjoe) (scraped on Sat Sep 6 19:02:43 CEST 2025) in ETFs the silent transaction killer:

Quote from: coupable on Today at 03:50:44 PM
It sounds plausible, I’m a bit stuck on the a holder is a holder no matter where they are self custody or third party,
If a third party cannot be considered the sole holder, those who store it with a third party, a buyer can say so and admit that he is the holder, but on the other hand, it cannot be said that if the trusted third party goes bankrupt and the liquidity of bitcoin is lost due to fraud or anything else, then you will only laugh with tears because you claim to hold bitcoin, when in fact you only entrust it without owning it.

Bitcoin stored with a third party is just a number; the actual Bitcoin is held and owned by them, not you.



16. Post 65776115 (unedited backup) (by hd49728) (scraped on Sat Sep 6 18:03:55 CEST 2025) in ETFs the silent transaction killer:

Quote from: coupable on Today at 03:50:44 PM
I totally disagree with your opinion. It's not the same measures as FIAT money because if you want to save that money you need a bank account since you cannot store cash in a personal vault at home. In the other hands, bitcoin can be stored in an offline wallet encrypted with complex algorithms installed in our personal devices or even without an active wallet, you just need the private keys who can be stored in a writtable metal or even a small piece of paper.
You can store your cash, gold at home in personal vaults or basements, anywhere you think secure and safe, but it's what you think and I agree that storing those things at home is very risky. Your home can be damaged by water, fire, explosion or natural catastrophe which can knock your house anytime. Storing them in banks is even not completely secure as there are reported bank heists in history.

Generally, one more thing to say no with this method, it is too cumbersome.

In contrast, storing bitcoin is not cumbersome and it is truly easy, flexible, portable and more.

The bullish case for Bitcoin.



17. Post 65775740 (unedited backup) (by abhiseshakana) (scraped on Sat Sep 6 16:01:14 CEST 2025) in The struggle for rare earth metals.:

Quote from: coupable on September 05, 2025, 07:45:31 PM
From the start, it was USA who pushed toward this war. The goal is to minimize powers of Russia. The solution is to sacrifice the whole region to fight in proxy for her. What to do? Invite Ukraine to join NATO which Russia wouldn't accept enemy armies on its frontieres. Behind the scenes, Europe found itself forced to support Ukraine to forbid Russia from expanding the invasion and to curb its expanding powers as well. The whole situation is strategic based till now. The rare metals appeard later when talking about solutions to stop the war after USA and europe got convainced that it's an expensive war that no one would benefit from except the east camp. What to do? Let's arrange with Russia and blackmail Ukraine.

The United States never pushed Ukraine into war with Russia, nor did it invite Ukraine to participate in NATO expansion. Ukraine's domestic initiative was the primary driver of its desire to join NATO. Political support from the United States and certain NATO allies facilitated and legitimized Ukraine's desire. This, of course, met with strong opposition from Russia. Russia's reaction changed Ukraine's security dynamics and strengthened Ukraine's resolve to seek Western protection.

The large-scale invasion remained Russia's sole decision. Even before 2022, Russia had demanded legal guarantees that Ukraine would never join NATO, a demand rejected by the US and Europe as a violation of the principle of state sovereignty. The US was a key actor in supporting Ukraine after the Russian aggression, but it did not instigate the war. The narrative that the US encouraged the war was used more by Russia and its allies, including China, to justify their military action.