Even if the source of the funds is suspicious, the platform has no right to retain them. Legally, the funds must be returned to the same address from which it came (this is why it's dangerous to deposit directly as a withdraw from another platform, should always use personal addresses), or the authorities must be notified to open an investigation about the user and the suspicious funds.

It looks like you are only targeting men by your questions because frequently women aren't the side that opens topics about financial management before the mariage. Personally, I will suggest a financial plan to manage family budget from both incomes me and her because I refuse to marry a jobless woman for several reasons.

This is can be considered a small amount of money to go through juridiction process. First, I don't think a wealthy company such as stake casino wouldn't risk its breputation fpr this small amount and you can see they pay bigger amount for a promotional campaign here in bitcointalk. second, it will cost you more than the held amount to go through a juridiction process.
I don't advice you to let go your case even after three years, but better continue making noises everywhere about your situation with stake. The casino has representatives here in the forum and they are reputed members who can help.

Meanwhile, Iran has a diversified economy that has withstood decennies of sanctions and economic embargoes.

Government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani announced on state television that every citizen will receive for the next four months, one million tomans (approximately $7) monthly through direct deposit payments in the form of credit rather than cash, which will allow the purchase of basic necessities

as suggested by Julerz, I see you started a topic in Games and Rounds board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=71.0 but you just quote your post here. Participants will have to come back here to read terms and this will add much more confusions. I suggest you paste all your previous post in the new giveaway thread.

What's even stranger about OP is that, looking at his post history, we can see he was active in mining and presumably knew exactly how it worked (was active in mining and hardware board since 2018 when he first joined the forum). So, his years of experience didn't teach him the absurdity of cloud mining and that it's nothing but a scam? I can't really find a valid explanation.

I think you are taking this very personally or that you are overly sensitive. I appreciate all your efforts to help people, and I apologize again if my stance ever offended you. I explained that I was mistaken in my assumptions about you that was based on my ignorance about you are volunteering offering to help. You are a real asset to this forum.
Please let it go and stop the sarcasm and mockery, that we are not kids.

I don't believe that taxation is the main obstacle to legalize Bitcoin in many countries because some countries have successfully set legislation to tax Bitcoin holdings and daily use with countries recognized bitcoin as a tender asset. In other words, any example can be followed and applied by the government willing to legalizing bitcoin use.
Governments always looking for new activities to apply taxation, but with bitcoin it can't apply taxation because they don't recognize it. Why they delay recognition despite it will generate more revenues from taxation? Simple because of decentralized nature of the blockchain which doesn't allow them to controle everything as they used with Fiat money.

None, unfortunately. I am still with three last cases on batch #2 and all three of them have one or two things missing from their side that need me to reinquire from them, so my contact on BC can handle the transaction. I'll move to your batch next.

Or perhaps you can ask coupable to try and handle your case. He was present in your thread too and he seemed to show a very great interest in questioning my capability and intent in handling BC's fiat cases. He probably can finally get a chance to put words into his mouth and prove his contribution to this section of the forum.

Is there any news..?

[...]

I didn't know you were volunteering out of your good will to help with pending cases because I see you contributing to all the discussions about bc game, so I assumed you were a professional mediator affiliated with the casino team or even a team member.

OP, Sankar02 know that I am doing all of these activities on SA with BC's stuck transaction out of my free time, my good will, and expect exactly nothing in return. Just as I don't expect an unnecessary headache and noises from sources that has zero contribution or relation and importance to the case, who seemingly only add headache to me.

So... I am dropping your case off of my plate. Feel free to find someone who's interested to solve cases out of their own time, with drama included. That said, may I suggest you to get coupable to try to take a look into your matter and perhaps give his best to get your situation resolved? Given he looks very interested in your matter.

The point I am trying to say is, I believe, very much clear. Repeating the same situation while the previous one is still in progress feels like "Let me just try and if I screw up again, I can just use the forum to clear the issue." is it not?

And no, I am not blaming him for his poor choice, though there are other means of withdrawal he can take, fully knowing this one method is problematic. I help so many others who are unfortunate enough to choose this transaction method, and I know and mentioned that batch #3 [OP's batch] will be a special headache given the numbers of stuck transactions each players have and the narrow window we have. Thus, what I have in mind is a question of intent, knowing that there is a chance that his transaction might get stuck due to the merchant issue, yet he's still attempting it. And the last thing I need is most definitely someone adding another transaction on their pile, all while their previous problematic transaction is still unhandled.

But it shall no longer be an issue, I believe.

---

OP, Sankar02 know that I am doing all of these activities on SA with BC's stuck transaction out of my free time, my good will, and expect exactly nothing in return. Just as I don't expect an unnecessary headache and noises from sources that has zero contribution or relation and importance to the case, who seemingly only add headache to me.

So... I am dropping your case off of my plate. Feel free to find someone who's interested to solve cases out of their own time, with drama included. That said, may I suggest you to get coupable to try to take a look into your matter and perhaps give his best to get your situation resolved? Given he looks very interested in your matter.