Is that information official? It might be the case of buying a casino by the new owner. There is another possibility of changing the brand name to represent the wide array of gambling options other than blackjack (which IMO is too narrow).

May be the new management will revisit the ongoing/past issues and try to resolve them.

Hal may have inherited the privkey and the bitcoins inside, but unfortunately he didn't inherit the knowledge as well, esp. how the wallets should be treated. I'm sure his keys have been exposed to multiple parties.

Thats right.  There has been much discussion among policymakers and national media about "Ukraines mineral resources" being one of the main reasons for the US interest in Ukraine, not just as some conspiracy theory.  The US is working very hard to decrease reliance on China for rare minerals, so controlling Ukraines mineral resources will provide America with a reliable supply chain that bypass Beijing.

Hello sir it is 2026…?

Now, there is a thought among many that everything can be done with AI to make quick money. Because there is so much discussion around AI that it seems credible to many. And scammers are taking advantage of this by creating fake bots to scam people. So crypto users should be careful and always keep themselves updated about new technologies.Because we see that scammers are constantly coming up with new scamming techniques, which often creates a confusing situation for crypto users and they fall into the scammers' trap.

It should be, or must be since these are investors or old token holders on which if they would be making up some migration then it is just that right that they will be having that compensation rather than having no intention on doing so. Once that they would be doing it then it would definitely affect them out into their new branding and thats not good for the business.,

Speaking about on ethicality, then it is just that right that they should be doing it rather than on having no announcement at all.

Their old thread are not locked and some members replied there. Yeah, we need their representative comes here or in their old thread so they can explaining the changes of their site. I also tried to visit their Telegram channel and also RollHub channel to check what is on there.

Hopefully, their old token holders can get compensation of the changing and they converted it to their new token, that will be good news for the holders.

As far as I know, in their old Telegram group, they had already informed members to switch to the new Telegram group. It seems their gambling site is already operating under a new brand or rebrand, as previously announced.
If there were any cases in the past, you should be able to contact support for the new casino site. If they haven't updated their ANN, it seems they don't want to run promotions for their business here. But in any case, it is still the same brand.

However, I am wondering about their old token holders, whether they will be automatically converted to their new token or not.

Even cheap AI can transform someone who was once just a text message scammer into an attacker with malicious code or verbal and visual impersonators. If they can use AI as a tool for crime, ordinary users whenever possible should be able to use it as a means of protection as well.
Technology is truly evolving rapidly these days.

I am confirming the receipt and the new repayment amount is also correct, thank you.

---

Received and the new repayment amount should be 378$. If you need more extension, then you will be charged 15% for the rest of the amount. Thanks.

---

Confirmed and accepted your offer.

---

Repayment confirmed in full, thank you.

As long as we keep trying, I'm sure we can see the end & conclusion of this problem. Grab everything you can get at the bottom, don't just give up at the surface. He last actively posted in July last year, which doesn't mean he's not active on the forum, he could still be looking around. If he is not actively monitoring, @OP can contact him via Telegram, here is his handle: https://t.me/sujonali1918

I've seen that with other casinos whenever a contest of their user why they have been banned. They don't usually disclose the reason on why it happened. Because that's true that it's possible by next time, they're going to find ways of avoiding it if ever they'd cheat again so that the casino won't find it out. It's for their security and I think a business standard for most casinos. But I do agree that at least give them a valid reason for which the others are starting to give the reason why.

They do have the right to know, but the casino will not go so far as to explain how its tracking system works, because cheaters might find ways to cheat the system.
The security team has all the evidence and will only send it to a third party they trust, or to arbitrators both parties trust, if the user goes so far as to request arbitration.
A casino will not ban a regular player even if he wins because he knows that gamblers will return to try to duplicate their success, and the casino knows it's not every day that you are in luck.

Your statement is incorrect and misrepresents how our service operates.
We do not offer the exchange of “dirty” funds, nor do we promote or facilitate money laundering in any form.
However, as an exchange service, we also do not confiscate or unlawfully retain user funds if a client independently sends assets that are later flagged as higher risk. This is a fundamental distinction that you continue to ignore.
Our process has been clearly described from the beginning:
1-We do not accept funds for the purpose of laundering or anonymization.
2-We do not mix deposits, obscure transaction history, or provide any form of anonymization.
3-If an incoming transaction is flagged, the client is informed immediately.
4-The client is then given a lawful choice: either proceed with the exchange under revised conditions and additional costs, or receive a refund.
5-No KYC is imposed retroactively, and no funds are frozen.
This approach is fully aligned with standard exchange practices and does not make our service comparable to a mixer. A mixer’s core function is to deliberately obfuscate the origin of funds — which we explicitly do not do.
Claiming that any non-custodial exchange which does not seize user funds is “similar to a mixer” is both technically and legally incorrect. If that logic were applied consistently, a significant portion of the regulated exchange industry would fall under the same accusation, which is obviously not the case.
Our licensing, compliance framework, and operational model are transparent. We have already explained this multiple times. Continuing to frame our service as something it is not appears less like a genuine inquiry and more like an attempt to discredit or remove us from the forum.
We consider the matter sufficiently clarified and expect further discussion to be based on factual understanding of how exchange services actually operate.

Close, but they're actually about INR, Indian Rupee, not NRN, Nigerian Naira. But, yes, the pile is so crazy that I would love to suggest my BC contact to consider finding a better merchant. I'll need my contact in high floor who's currently went under the radar while handling long-project, though.

India put a heavy tax on crypto purchase, that's why many INR-user prefer to use fiat. I would suggest INR-user who want to try to use crypto to visit marketplace and find p2p [and the trustworthiness of them based on their trust rating] instead.

---

Umm... you're on third batch, I'm currently crossing everyone on batch #2, with someone from other department of BC who volunteered to help while they get me a new fiat contact. Please wait a little bit more. As in... early 2026, if you don't mind.