Last update: 2026-03-28_Sat_15.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
coupable receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. coupable
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "coupable" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66550193 (unedited backup) (by JeromeTash) (scraped on Thu Mar 26 22:22:20 CET 2026) in [SCAM/WARNING] MyNitro.io 57mBTC 9 months delay:
What is worse is that the complaints that come up here are never resolved. it's like they don't care about their reputaion anymore.
OP thinks that they didn't process his withdrawal because they don't have enough funds, so either they have to pay him his withdrawal or they should shut down. Poor guy.
OP, don't expect a casino can't pay 57mBTC. It is a very small amount at the point they even dumb scammers would pay it to encourage you return and keep playing. They are are scammers ready to steal all the deposits even few cents. As you can see, their strategy is to change the branding domain, and it seems their scam strategy is generating some profits. Forget about your money and dyor next time. Some lessons in life are a little bit expensive. Sorry for your loss bro.
Maybe they want to pull off a Freebitco.in kind of exit strategy. Deny users withdrawals but keep accepting deposits until the website one day goes offline. In other words, any money that you deposit never comes out regardless of the outcome of your bets (wins or losses).
Update
At the moment, the processing of my withdrawal request has been put on hold because they are “investigating suspicious betting patterns,” and since I have no idea which account I’m supposedly linked to, they can’t complete the process.
It looks like my wait is finally over after 9 months, I’ll find out that I’ve been scammed, I suppose.
So they keep shifting from one excuse to another? Tried AskGamblers?
2. Post 66545807 (unedited backup) (by albon) (scraped on Wed Mar 25 17:25:01 CET 2026) in Winvest.com - Ponzi scheme:
Do you have any idea how they can purchase those old domains? The Winvest domain is 20+ years age and has a recorded history in wayback machine (hundreds of captures) but can't access them because of set parameters. Such domain should cost a big price. Or the original owner is the one behind this current attempt for scam.
I've known about this site for years; it's expireddomains.net. Through it, you can snatch old, expired, or deleted domains, or domains with high backlinks and Domain Authority. They can also purchase old domains through other platforms that list them.
I don’t know the exact prices of these domains, but I expect that most of them are penalized by Google and abandoned by their owners. Not all old or expired domains are cheap, their price depends on several factors, including the domain’s reputation. Through these domains and the scam schemes they run on them, they can earn significant illegal money, which can compensate for the cost of purchasing the domains. However, not every old domain that is bought is used for fraud, it can also be used for other legitimate purposes.
3. Post 66544634 (unedited backup) (by jacksonq716) (scraped on Wed Mar 25 10:08:43 CET 2026) in [SCAM/WARNING] Coinsgame unjustified seizure of my 222000CAD:
Their rating on CasinoGuru dropped to 1.2 because of my complaint. When I first checked their reviews, they had a score of 8.5 and were rated as 'Excellent,' being recommended for most players. Below is the link to my complaint thread on CasinoGuru
https://casino.guru/complaints/coins-game-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closed-6
4. Post 66543947 (unedited backup) (by tvplus006) (scraped on Wed Mar 25 01:15:25 CET 2026) in Winvest.com - Ponzi scheme:
Scammers use these very old domains to appear as if they have been in the industry for many years and possess enough experience to run their operations. In reality, most of these domains are newly set up this year. Therefore, everyone should be cautious and avoid platforms that promise fixed and guaranteed profits over short periods.
Do you have any idea how they can purchase those old domains? The Winvest domain is 20+ years age and has a recorded history in wayback machine (hundreds of captures) but can't access them because of set parameters. Such domain should cost a big price. Or the original owner is the one behind this current attempt for scam.
This domain belonged to different owners, and this is confirmed by the data from the web archive dated June 19, 2010, according to which this domain was put up for auction by GoDaddy (see the screenshot). If the domain is sold through an auction before it is deleted, then its age remains. I wrote about the reasons why the Wayback Machine cannot save this site here -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577856.msg66527175#msg66527175
5. Post 66542449 (unedited backup) (by albon) (scraped on Tue Mar 24 17:17:55 CET 2026) in Winvest.com - Ponzi scheme:
Their website is fully designed with AI. A naive user can detect this in the videos displayed in main page. Without checking further, each time you find a daily fixed profit return even by 0,10%, it is definetly a scam.
What I find a little bit strange is that the domain name was really registered since 1998. If someone can use the wayback machine to check historical archive for this domain. I failed to do so.
This is absolutely true. Artificial intelligence has become a tool in the hands of scammers to make their traps more convincing and to add a sense of legitimacy to them, along with deepfakes as well. However, I am completely certain that if someone takes the time to investigate, verify, and do proper research, they can quickly uncover the truth behind these schemes.
Scammers use these very old domains to appear as if they have been in the industry for many years and possess enough experience to run their operations. In reality, most of these domains are newly set up this year. Therefore, everyone should be cautious and avoid platforms that promise fixed and guaranteed profits over short periods.
6. Post 66539138 (unedited backup) (by uneng) (scraped on Mon Mar 23 17:54:31 CET 2026) in Biggest problem now not just earning good income but where to hold wealt :
Accumulate funds until you reach an enough amount of money to acquire a piece of land or house. Properties are still the best investment, as you can make passive income from this, besides the fact they always go up in value. You can rent, you can produce something from the land, you can resell or you can simply live on it. I guess that is the safe path to follow, although there are others, like for an example, predicting which asset or bond is going to be the next thing.
This is what most of investors residing in Ukraine thought about after the 2022 Russian invasion. Many of them should have been moving to the Arabic Gulf especially UAE and Qatar and bought real estates as a safe investment because of the encouraging climate of investment there. After just 4 years, another war has started to reach the Gulf territories despite those countries are not part of it. I am sure those investments coming from Ukraine lost part of their investments value because real estate prices should have been significantly decreased, and nonody wants to invest in those territories anymore. This just a simple example to prove the fragility of real estate investments in large scale.
Of course the location must be analyzed before making the investment. To invest in Arabic Gulf was a bad move, but it could have worked if they had gone for a more historically peaceful region... Even inside my country, for an example, I have to be careful where to acquire a portion of land, because there are dangerous areas controlled by criminal factions. So, if I purchase something there encouraged by the cheap prices, I'm going to have a lot of problems later.
There are many variables, and risks are still present like in any other investment, but if you are careful on you analysys, it's still going to be much safer compared to investments where you have to hold currencies, assets and bonds.
7. Post 66538278 (unedited backup) (by Halabaku) (scraped on Mon Mar 23 14:03:14 CET 2026) in [SCAM] Bitz.io – Unjustified seizure of winnings – WinSector N.V.:
Update: Bitz.io management reached out to me via email (
manager@bitz.io) after my review on Trustpilot. They have reviewed the case, admitted that the previous decision was a mistake, and reinstated my winnings.
I have successfully withdrawn my funds. I want to thank the members here (especially Mahdirakib and coupable) for their insights. The matter is now resolved, and I consider this case closed. I will keep the thread here as a record for others who might face similar issues.
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/03/23/Uvt2Vv.png
8. Post 66536901 (unedited backup) (by Halabaku) (scraped on Mon Mar 23 01:44:44 CET 2026) in [SCAM] Bitz.io – Unjustified seizure of winnings – WinSector N.V.:
Since they refund you your initial deposit, there are no intentions to scam you, as the confiscated winning amount is not that big. There must be something unusual with your activity.
Are you resident in any of the following countries; Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Botswana, Belgium, Bulgaria, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ecuador, Ethiopia, France, Ghana, Guyana, Hungary, Hong Kong, Italy, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Namibia, Nicaragua, North Korea, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Romania, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Sudan, Syria, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, United States of America, Yemen, Zimbabwe or other restricted jurisdictions? This is the list of restricted countries to use bitz as stipulated in their TOS [1].
Or if you reside in a country in which access to online gambling to its residents or to any person within is prohibited? It's also mentioned that if so, you are not allowed to use this casino.
[1]
https://bitz.io/termsThe restricted countries list is a red herring in this specific case for three critical reasons:
1. Lack of Enforcement during Deposit: The casino’s system allowed me to register from my region without a VPN, accepted my deposit, and permitted me to place multiple bets. If a region is truly restricted, the technical burden is on the operator to block IP access or registration at the 'front door.'
2. The 'Freeroll' Logic: If a casino allows a player from a 'restricted' region to lose their money without intervention, but only invokes the
TOS to void winnings when that player wins, it is a predatory practice. They take 100% of the profit when I lose, but 0% of the risk when I win. This is the definition of a 'freeroll' scam and is not a legitimate application of terms.
3. The Casino's Own Statement: Most importantly, the support team (Agents Jesse and Sam) did not cite my residency as the reason for the closure. They specifically alleged 'unscrupulous play' under their betting rules. By their own admission, my location was not the trigger for this action—my winning was.
They are hiding behind 'internal investigations' to avoid paying out a mere €85 in profit ( imagine what they can do to 8k winnings) If they can’t provide evidence of a rule breach for such a small amount, their 'final decision' is nothing more than an arbitrary seizure of funds.
I am not saying they have a valid reason to seize your winnings because they didn't provide the exact reason to do so. And even if you are residing in one of the restricted regions, they should stop you from the beginning to access the platform. I just try to make an assumption about what could be the explanation of such a decision considering it's a very small amount. In your post, you didn't mention if you have completed KYC verification procedures before this incident, and if it's your first time using bitz casino. And you didn't also reply yo my question if you are resident from one of the restricted countries. In my opinion, since they refunded your initial deposit, it cannot be because of betting abuse suspicions. Using the sentence "unscrupulous play" is so vague and might be a canned message or an automated reply. I don't also neglige the possibility of a system glitch, however I find it hard to believe it could be an act of scam.
I appreciate the objective follow-up.
On Residency: I am residing in a region where the site was fully accessible without any technical workarounds (no VPN). As I mentioned, if they are accepting deposits and bets from a region, they cannot retroactively enforce a restriction only when a withdrawal is requested. That is the core of the 'freeroll' issue.
On KYC: My account was in good standing, i uploaded the the documents for verification in settings without them even asking and I was not asked for further KYC documents prior to this incident. They processed the return of my deposit without requiring additional identity verification, which suggests that identity/documentation was not the bottleneck—their refusal to pay the profit was.
At this point, we agree that 'unscrupulous play' is a canned, vague response. By refusing to provide a technical explanation for a mere €85 win, the casino is admitting they have no solid evidence. I have provided my ID to the manager as requested on Trustpilot, but I remain skeptical given their earlier 'final decision.'
I will keep the thread updated if they actually provide a real explanation or release the funds, but for now, the 'SCAM' tag stands based on the lack of transparency and the bad-faith seizure of winnings.
9. Post 66536855 (unedited backup) (by Halabaku) (scraped on Mon Mar 23 00:59:08 CET 2026) in [SCAM] Bitz.io – Unjustified seizure of winnings – WinSector N.V.:
Since they refund you your initial deposit, there are no intentions to scam you, as the confiscated winning amount is not that big. There must be something unusual with your activity.
Are you resident in any of the following countries; Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Botswana, Belgium, Bulgaria, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ecuador, Ethiopia, France, Ghana, Guyana, Hungary, Hong Kong, Italy, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Namibia, Nicaragua, North Korea, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Romania, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Sudan, Syria, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, United States of America, Yemen, Zimbabwe or other restricted jurisdictions? This is the list of restricted countries to use bitz as stipulated in their TOS [1].
Or if you reside in a country in which access to online gambling to its residents or to any person within is prohibited? It's also mentioned that if so, you are not allowed to use this casino.
[1]
https://bitz.io/termsThe restricted countries list is a red herring in this specific case for three critical reasons:
1. Lack of Enforcement during Deposit: The casino’s system allowed me to register from my region without a VPN, accepted my deposit, and permitted me to place multiple bets. If a region is truly restricted, the technical burden is on the operator to block IP access or registration at the 'front door.'
2. The 'Freeroll' Logic: If a casino allows a player from a 'restricted' region to lose their money without intervention, but only invokes the
TOS to void winnings when that player wins, it is a predatory practice. They take 100% of the profit when I lose, but 0% of the risk when I win. This is the definition of a 'freeroll' scam and is not a legitimate application of terms.
3. The Casino's Own Statement: Most importantly, the support team (Agents Jesse and Sam) did not cite my residency as the reason for the closure. They specifically alleged 'unscrupulous play' under their betting rules. By their own admission, my location was not the trigger for this action—my winning was.
They are hiding behind 'internal investigations' to avoid paying out a mere €85 in profit ( imagine what they can do to 8k winnings) If they can’t provide evidence of a rule breach for such a small amount, their 'final decision' is nothing more than an arbitrary seizure of funds.
10. Post 66534228 (unedited backup) (by ArielRod20) (scraped on Sun Mar 22 07:38:49 CET 2026) in BlueWallet or Trust Wallet?:
To start with a beginner-friendly app wallet which do you recommend?
If I have to chose one of the two suggestions, I will definetly chose BlueWallet. But keep in mind this is an only-bitcoin wallet. I would recommend Electrum Wallet as a better alternative. Just be sure to download it from a trusted source.
As for a wallet supporting altcoins, I will definetly avoid Trust Wallet for threasons explained in previous replies. I would recommend a hardware wallet like Trezor Wallet or Ledger Wallet. Always make sure to buy it from a reliable source.
yes it was only for bitcoin wallet. For altcoins i can not buy trezor or ledger wallet im looking like a software wallet same as Cake wallet alternative.
11. Post 66533145 (unedited backup) (by Zee12) (scraped on Sat Mar 21 21:21:19 CET 2026) in [SCAM ALERT]ECOS.amWithholding $1,696Net Evidence of 11Ignored Emails&208BTCBug:
First of all, why do you think I'm using AI? Is it because my arguments are too organized for a 'scammer' to handle? 😂 Maybe it’s just the result of staying calm and focusing on the facts!
I suspected you because you are not defending any argument here but talking about an imaginary scenario without any valid reason to do so.
it seems that I am not mistaken about you using AI to create those well organized replies. Let's take one of your replies:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577664.msg66526545#msg66526545I appreciate your input, but we must look at the facts. Many platforms start honestly and later face financial trouble or insolvency, leading them to delay customer withdrawals and manipulate balances. My goal here is two-fold:
1- To Recover my Funds: By using their own official admissions and the threat of a Registrar report as direct leverage.
2- To Create a Roadmap for Others: I am documenting every step of my strategy so that anyone facing the same 'stalling' tactics can learn how to apply pressure effectively.
I am updating this thread with every development. If they think they can 'scam' more money or hide behind a grayed-out withdrawal button, they are mistaken. The global crypto community is watching, and the evidence is solid. I’m not just 'reporting'—I’m fighting for my rights.
GPTZero: 100% AI content
Link:
https://app.gptzero.me/documents/23e405b5-72be-450b-adb7-1a8eeb7500f6copyleaks: 100% AI content
quillbot: 58% AI / 48% Human
Now let's take another one (your last reply):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577664.msg66530929#msg66530929First of all, why do you think I'm using AI? Is it because my arguments are too organized for a 'scammer' to handle? 😂 Maybe it’s just the result of staying calm and focusing on the facts!
Now, let’s look at the results of this 'AI-style' pressure:
Admission of Funds: After constant pressure, they officially admitted the debt and credited my account with the funds.
The Stalling: When I tried to withdraw, they initially blocked the button. After I escalated again, they 'activated' it but deducted a portion of the balance.
Current Status: They have now acknowledged the deduction, and I have successfully submitted a withdrawal request to my wallet for the available amount.
I am not 'running after ghosts.' I am managing a recovery process. Once the transfer is complete and I have recovered the full amount, I will update this thread with all the evidence and screenshots to show everyone exactly how to deal with such platforms.
Stay tuned for the final update!
GPTZero: 99% AI content
Link:
https://app.gptzero.me/documents/23e405b5-72be-450b-adb7-1a8eeb7500f6copyleaks: 100% AI content
quillbot: 63% AI / 37% Human
Honestly, I can't understand why you're doing this or what exactly you're trying to prove by posting replies here using AI. Please close this thread and go find a job.
It’s fascinating that you’re spending your time running my posts through AI detectors instead of focusing on the actual results.
As a legal professional, I am trained to be precise, organized, and persistent. If my arguments are too structured for you to handle, that's a 'you' problem, not an AI problem. In these forums, we are used to seeing people post 'Scam Alerts,' cry over their lost money, and then just walk away without taking any real action. I am not one of them. Here is a reality check:
While you were busy 'investigating' my writing style, I successfully forced a scam platform to activate my withdrawal button and admit to a $1,696.80 debt.
While you told me to 'give up and move on,' I recovered $1,357.30 which is currently in the final stage of withdrawal.
If being 'human' means staying silent and losing money, then I’d rather be 'organized and efficient.'
I am here to share a masterclass on the recovery process, not to pass your literature test. Whether I use tools to organize my thoughts or not is irrelevant the results are real. If you're not here to help, maybe you’re the one who should 'move on' and find a job instead of playing detective with my posts.
I will post the final proof of the full transfer soon. Stay tuned for the update!