I agree with you, if analytical skills were the key to profitability then many traders would have become very rich.

Trading is not as easy as turning your palm, the market is not as good as you think, having skills in analyzing it does not mean you will always be right in predicting the market, there will always be moments where your entry misses due to market fluctuations that occur unexpectedly.

Not to mention the problem of emotions that are not easy to control, so actually there are still many things that trigger losses even though for example you feel you have enough skills in analyzing the market.

It is true that KYC information must be secure but if everyone goes to a non KYC casino, problems can arise elsewhere. Because there are other risks with non KYC sites. For example if someone loses their account or their money is frozen, they cannot get help because they cannot show proper proof. Some non KYC sites are not trustworthy at all. I think security does not just mean hiding information. Rather it is about choosing casinos that handle data responsibly and follow the rules, that is I am talking about large and reputable gambling platforms.

Yes, criminals use fiat money the most because it is very easy to hide cash money and it cannot be tracked. Many criminals still do not know how Bitcoin or other crypto coins work. Cash money is the largest money laundering method in the world. So those who now blame Bitcoin do not know the concept of Bitcoin. They only know that anonymous transactions can be made through Bitcoin, so they make such comments. Although Bitcoin can be transacted anonymously, every transaction can be tracked due to its fixed supply and open source, so not all criminals will consider Bitcoin as a potential medium.

They can be good on analyzing on each situation happening in trading, but actually it doesn't guarantee any passive profits to them.

Since as always no one can predict the flow or movement of the market that's why even if they are good analyst as what they claim we cannot assume that they are passively earning on each trades they execute.

But somehow its good that they have knowledge since they can manage everything well on each action they want to do. Also usually they can do great decision towards what they do on each situations they are facing on the market.

West Indies are 32 for 2 and still 41 runs behind so they need a big fightback. No one even scored a fifty in their first innings, so they’ll need much better batting this time. If they want a real chance, they probably need around 250-300 runs from here. Since the pitch has been tough and no team has reached 300 yet. A couple of strong partnerships could keep them in the game but another quick wicket would hand New Zealand the match.

It doesn't work that way, even if that's the expectation. It's like saying every good football analyst is a great footballer. Nah! Theory isn't the same as practical, you and I know it. In trading, analysing trades and having strategies is even less than 50% of what it takes to trade. People can be extremely good at analysing trades but can't execute that and profit from their entries because emotions will mess their analyses up. Trading is more of an emotional control thing than analyses.

Actually, there are other things that a trader must master in order to become a good trader besides good analysis. Namely, emotional management and risk management. Even an analyst can still fall into losses if he gets carried away by emotions in market trends. Such as getting carried away by hype in the market. Or he becomes greedy and deviates from the well-thought-out plan that has been carefully prepared.

Or if an analyst does not regularly update the news they need to know about the fundamental conditions of the market. Sometimes the market can suddenly reverse direction and not match the technical analysis.

So, we often see even large traders suffer losses because their positions are liquidated in the futures market, even with values of millions of dollars.

A good analyst is supposed to be a good trader because if you can analyze well you can avoid unnecessary emotions and mistakes but there is no perfect analysts because whatever they come up with is based on their predictions. To be a good analyst you need to have the knowledge of a good trader and that is deep knowledge in technical analysis and fundamental analysis. The point is that if you are good in analysis doesn't mean that you cannot lose in trading, the best professional traders experience loses because trading is risky. Unfortunately there are people who claim to be trading analysts but in actual fact they are just like every regular traders without deep understanding and that is why they are not be good traders.

usdt are regularly freezing people's assets, how it’s can be trustworthy now,
but usdt is much popular from other stable coins, it’s widely using stable coins not specific region,
considering it’s millions of users, usdt is top stable coin,
however, it’s not safe to restore in your wallet, i just swap to my altcoins to usdt and sell it.
dai is popular decentralized coin but it’s not much using stable coin.

I'm sure there are other options, including USDT and USDC. Liquidity for other options will be limited, so I don't even know about many. I split my holdings between USDT and USDC. Choosing just one doesn't feel right. I don't believe any stablecoin is completely reliable. So, for me, they're the same. There's some debate about transparency for USDT, it doesn't matter to me. I just split it in half and don't think much about it.

Stable coins as they're called are preferred by investors to use and maintain the value of their funds when they' ain't sure of the market behaviour to what direction the market would go. Hence they change their coins to stablecoin. Though stablecoins ain't that immutable, they still have their risk since they're centralized the company can fold along the process or have your funds frozen for certain unclear reasons. All am saying is this stablecoins USDT and USDC can do you dirty despite being some of the top secured stablecoins.

Among centralized stable coins, USDT and USDC seem comfortable to me. Although one is more known, popular and used than the other depending on the location in Asia, Europe and America. USDT is more popular and used in Asia, USDC is more popular and used in Europe. Since stable coins have been tested for a long time, it can be assumed that they are usable and reliable in terms of security as time has passed. However, if we talk about decentralized coins, DAI is the safest for me.

However, in my opinion, these three elements are interconnected in gambling. Strategy, skill & luck are closely intertwined. I believe that luck is impossible to achieve without a solid strategy & skill. When gambling is done haphazardly without a solid strategy & skill, the chance of getting lucky still exists, but it's very small. Therefore, the best skills & strategies are needed to maximize the chances of getting lucky in gambling.

Secure in terms of what and from whom? They are both secure enough, but these days you might have more issues changing USDT to EUR for example.
But you might want to explain what properties you need for a stablecoin, as it also could be pegged to other things then dollars.

And anything in this space is experimental and risky. If not by shady reserves, then just via 0d exploits and noobs vulnerabilities to social engineering.

Personally i trust way less to tether after they decided not to comply with EU regulations or be more transparent.

Absolutely true. It's unfair to say that Bitcoin is a haven for criminals. Even in fiat there's a lot of crime, but why is the focus solely on Bitcoin? Bitcoin is a highly transparent blockchain technology.

It's important to emphasize that every developing technology has both positive and negative sides, and this applies to all technologies, whether email, social media, crypto, or even fiat, which can be used for criminal purposes by certain individuals. So let's look at it fairly: Bitcoin offers many benefits for all of us. We can't avoid criminals exploiting Bitcoin, but what's certain is that Bitcoin provides many benefits to society.

These two stable big industry coins are not safe to hold but majority might not be aware of this. You are only holding them for the sake of shifting away from the volatility market to maintain value but they are not that safe to hold. You coin can be frozen at any time without your consent. Don't argue with me cost you can always do your finding. I am not immuned to this because I am also holding it lol.
Who is going to safe us now?

Bitcoin is a global asset, which allows criminals to easily transact with it. It can only identify the wallet but not the person, so criminals can transact anonymously. Bitcoin has become a potential source for global asset transactions. Due to the depreciation of fiat or the limitations of regional monetary systems, the demand and acceptance of this digital asset is increasing across regional boundaries.

Every positive impact will have a negative impact, so you need to learn about each issue and accept only the positive side. Anyone involved in crime can commit a crime in any way if given the opportunity. Focusing on a specific issue is purposeful.

The USDT has had enough trouble of its own for years. However, being a stablecoin linked to the crypto world, I believe it will not be affected, as it has held the number 1 spot for so long. As for USDC, it has passed virtually all government clearances and regional acceptance, so it's technically safer. What I do is hold my assets in two of them in case of unforeseen circumstances, and I do it 50:50 now.

What I won't do is hold my crypto assets in other stablecoins. I view them as riskier than the two (USDT & USDC).

To be honest, the West Indies team did not perform very well in the first Test match, getting all out for just 167 runs. Because of this, most people thought that they would not be able to bat well against New Zealand in the second innings against the target of 531 runs. But the West Indies batsmen batted very responsibly in the second innings. The West Indies batsmen batted very responsibly from the beginning against the target of 531 runs given by New Zealand. The West Indies batsmen batted very responsibly and they were able to draw the Test match against New Zealand. Shai Hope and Justin Greaves are the two batsmen who helped the West Indies team draw the match against New Zealand. New Zealand is undoubtedly a stronger team than the West Indies. But the West Indies team was able to draw the Test match because of their responsible performance in the second innings.

In the northern part of Nigeria, where bandits are kidnaping people everyday I've never heard that they have demanded for cryptocurrency as ransom, not even for once, maybe because they are bunch of illiterates that are illegally armed with AK-47. The point that I'm making is that there are countless crimes that have been committed with fiat yet some group of people will intentionally or ignorantly be giving Bitcoin a bad name.

Criminals are looking for easy tools to perfect their crimes and they will use any means that suits their type of crimes. It could be through cryptocurrency, fiat, weapons or physical combat, all the things I mentioned have always been in existence before cryptocurrency. Maybe that is why much concentration is on crypto being the latest tool for criminal acts. Bitcoin haters should know that it has far more benefits than what criminals are using it for.

Even a few years ago, things weren't like this! But now there is literally no control over what adults should see and what minors can see! Even if one doesn't gamble, they are bound to see these gambling ads eventually! Not to mention how big sports/movie figures are involved in these promotions, well teenagers can't help following their idols. What I really hate is the easy accessibility to these sites despite being illegal! And I'm not talking only about gambling! For example take po*n sites, they would just ask whether we are 18+ or not, there aren't any actual checks happening, you just click yes and you are able to access it! No need to bypass, use vpn proxy, hide your location or anything, just search it, visit the link, and have quick access.

That's what I exactly thinking about English side that Atleast they will try to draw things if failed to take dominance over Aussies as it will somehow safe thier team dignity at such big Ashes rivalry, it's true that currently Aussies were dominating and I taught they will struggle like English at thier innings, but surprisingly from top to bottom rest of player contribute enough to total score and while still having handosme number of wicket definitely indicate thier upper hand over situation, but let's wait for next day as it will somehow clear things.

Yes, Australia has done that, so far Australia has a lead of 44 runs. Australia ended the first day of their first innings on 378 runs, which means if they can take a few more runs lead tomorrow for the next four wickets, that will be a bonus for the second innings. However, it seems that if England cannot bat in the second innings like they did in the first, the amount of lead Australia takes in their first innings will become dangerous for England. England's batting average was very poor, especially two to three batsmen who played well enough, which allowed England to score 334 runs. If England cannot score runs in the second innings like they did in the first innings, then England will definitely lose and there is no chance of a draw.

KYC may be mandatory in majority of the places. But in my opinion, where I live, it has lots of gray areas to consider. First of all, gambling is illegal at my place (but people still do gamble without any problems most of the time), so you see they ones that run here doesn't operate legally. Also many of them are straight forward, don't have to worry about license or even KYC, just register, deposit and play! That's how it's been here! That's what attracted the young mass to start gambling to these sites!