Last update: 2025-11-18_Tue_16.00h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
|MINER| receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. |MINER|
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "|MINER|" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66062940 (unedited backup) (by noormcs5) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 05:57:13 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
To be honest I didn't really expect that the Afghanistani A team will going to be all out in only 78 run. Because in reality, when we watch the International matches, the Afghanistan team is not in this condition, but the Bangladeshi team is in a bad condition.
From that perspective, I thought that the Afghanistan team would be able to beat the Bangladeshi team today, but they couldn't hold their own against the Bangladeshi team's bowlers.
Why couldn't anyone have predicted that Afghanistan would be all out for just 78 runs against Bangladesh? The way Afghanistan defeated Sri Lanka in their first match made it look like they would have a very tough competition against Bangladesh. But Bangladesh's Ripon Mondal's three consecutive hits at the start caused a complete batting disaster for Afghanistan. Then Afghanistan's Rasooli tried a bit but even then Afghanistan could not score more than 78 runs. As a result, Bangladesh scored 78 runs for the loss of just four wickets and defeated them by a big margin of eight wickets. Now Bangladesh is at the bottom of the points table with four points and is on the verge of becoming the group champion.
BAN-A won an easy game against the Afghanistan A team yesterday. Afghanistan A team could only manage 79 runs in their 20 overs. With these small runs, you can expect the bowlers to defend this low total.
They lost 5 wickets for 35 runs and it was the worst possible start. Captain Darwish Rasooli was the highest scorer in this innings with only 27 runs. This was their first loss in the Group A match While Bangladesh A sits right at top winning both the matches played so far.
2. Post 66062897 (unedited backup) (by Sithara007) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 05:23:32 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
To be honest I didn't really expect that the Afghanistani A team will going to be all out in only 78 run. Because in reality, when we watch the International matches, the Afghanistan team is not in this condition, but the Bangladeshi team is in a bad condition.
From that perspective, I thought that the Afghanistan team would be able to beat the Bangladeshi team today, but they couldn't hold their own against the Bangladeshi team's bowlers.
This actually hinsts about the lack of player pool in Afghanistan and availability of that in Bangladesh. 'A' series typically involve players who are usually kept in bench. During yesterday's match, captain Darwish Rasooli was the only Afghan player who could offer some resistance with the bat. Ripon Mondol, Rakibul Hasan and Meherob Hasan hardly found any difficulty in picking wickets. And during the chase, AM Ghazanfar with his leg breaks troubled the Bangladeshi batsmen are returned figures of 4-1-8-2.
3. Post 66062514 (unedited backup) (by Nothingtodo) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 00:54:13 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
To be honest I didn't really expect that the Afghanistani A team will going to be all out in only 78 run. Because in reality, when we watch the International matches, the Afghanistan team is not in this condition, but the Bangladeshi team is in a bad condition.
From that perspective, I thought that the Afghanistan team would be able to beat the Bangladeshi team today, but they couldn't hold their own against the Bangladeshi team's bowlers.
Why couldn't anyone have predicted that Afghanistan would be all out for just 78 runs against Bangladesh? The way Afghanistan defeated Sri Lanka in their first match made it look like they would have a very tough competition against Bangladesh. But Bangladesh's Ripon Mondal's three consecutive hits at the start caused a complete batting disaster for Afghanistan. Then Afghanistan's Rasooli tried a bit but even then Afghanistan could not score more than 78 runs. As a result, Bangladesh scored 78 runs for the loss of just four wickets and defeated them by a big margin of eight wickets. Now Bangladesh is at the bottom of the points table with four points and is on the verge of becoming the group champion.
4. Post 66061726 (unedited backup) (by Dickiy) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 20:43:49 CET 2025) in Do you bet against the public? let’s talk about it:
Obviously, the statistically stronger team certainly has a greater chance of winning. Above, I only spoke from a rational perspective, and using statistics as a reference for decision-making isn't always entirely accurate. This means that luck also plays a role. When a stronger team loses to a weaker team due to a small, inadvertent mistake on the field, it means they and those betting on them are unlucky.
But ultimately, the most important thing, in my opinion, is to bet responsibly, regardless of whether you follow the hype or analyze it yourself.
Yes, the last main point is that when we bet on a match, we use our brains and then bet. It is not that we bet on a team because most people are betting on it or that we will always lose because a team is behind in weak banking.
Because the result of a match is based on many factors and then comes the outcome. When a strong team has their main players out of the squad due to injury or any other reason, then it can be seen that even the strongest team has a chance of losing. So, considering everything, we should do our own analysis and then place bets.
Yes, the point is, anything can happen on the field, and this can lead to different outcomes, regardless of whether you support the stronger team or not. The tragedy of a player suffering an injury on the field can certainly have a negative impact on a team, which in most cases usually causes the team to lose its balance, especially if the player is a key player.
The point is, bet according to your own beliefs. If you know how to read statistics, use that skill to analyze. But it's also free. I mean, you're free to make your own predictions or follow the public's perspective, as long as you don't regret the results.
5. Post 66056971 (unedited backup) (by Dickiy) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 19:53:55 CET 2025) in Do you bet against the public? let’s talk about it:
Most people will naturally favor the team that's statistically favored, but one thing we must remember is that this isn't a guarantee of victory. This means betting based on hype, according to the public's bets, can be wrong. The reason is that I often see favored teams lose to weaker teams, even when they're playing at home.
The ball is round, and anything can happen on the field, and it doesn't always depend on statistics. Sometimes small mistakes on the field can have major consequences, such as defeat. Therefore, when I bet, I don't let the public's decisions influence me.
Actually I want to agree with you and at the same time I want to say that the majority public bets on the side of the team that they think is stronger in terms of strength and that is why the opposing team basically gets high odds. And in most cases it is seen that in such games the stronger team wins and the majority public wins the bet.
However, there are some exceptional matches where the underdog team wins, in which case it can be seen that maturity can also be achieved by betting against the people, but this is very relative, so I would say that I always consider it better to bet based on my own analysis.
Obviously, the statistically stronger team certainly has a greater chance of winning. Above, I only spoke from a rational perspective, and using statistics as a reference for decision-making isn't always entirely accurate. This means that luck also plays a role. When a stronger team loses to a weaker team due to a small, inadvertent mistake on the field, it means they and those betting on them are unlucky.
But ultimately, the most important thing, in my opinion, is to bet responsibly, regardless of whether you follow the hype or analyze it yourself.
6. Post 66052704 (unedited backup) (by Hewlet) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 19:00:56 CET 2025) in Do you bet against the public? let’s talk about it:
Most people will naturally favor the team that's statistically favored, but one thing we must remember is that this isn't a guarantee of victory. This means betting based on hype, according to the public's bets, can be wrong. The reason is that I often see favored teams lose to weaker teams, even when they're playing at home.
The ball is round, and anything can happen on the field, and it doesn't always depend on statistics. Sometimes small mistakes on the field can have major consequences, such as defeat. Therefore, when I bet, I don't let the public's decisions influence me.
Actually I want to agree with you and at the same time I want to say that the majority public bets on the side of the team that they think is stronger in terms of strength .
It's just a normal thing if you ask me because you don't leave out on teams that have an higher potential of winning to bet on the ones that have a lower potential of winning. What people work with is statistics and for the most part, it's the team that has the highest chance of likely winning that gets people attention the most. That's why people gamble more on teams that see stronger
7. Post 66051127 (unedited backup) (by xenomorfo) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 11:17:13 CET 2025) in Have you ever lost big and thought about quitting betting?:
There may be a simple reason for this too and that is our human instinct, meaning that since we are human we can lose our emotional control at any time even if we try to control it and in all those cases when people gamble they sometimes make irresponsible decisions and that is when they basically face big losses.
But if you are doing this, we should all remember this because if we make a wrong decision once or twice and face loss, it may be possible to recover from it, but if this happens to us constantly, we will become addicted to it and as a result, we will fall behind in all stages of life, starting from financial crisis.
I've always said it ad nauseum, the problem of dealing with loss, in my opinion, comes from the fact that you've bet or gambled too much money. The fundamental problem is not the loss, the problem is why did you gamble money that you couldn't gamble? That is the question we must try to answer, because it is called gambling, not gambling.
8. Post 66038991 (unedited backup) (by Cossyblack) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 14:23:32 CET 2025) in JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas:
I would not presume that building up emergency funds that are three months of your expenses is easy. It could take a year or two.
I also do not recommend building up an emergency fund prior to getting started investing into bitcoin.
There surely has to be some back up funds that are present when investing into bitcoin, and guys have to figure out how much they are going to need while engaging in such build up, and if they screw up they are going to be the one to pay in the event that they failed/refused to build up and keep sufficient back up funds.
I also hypothesized that a lot of people already are in the practice of keeping some level of back up funds, even before they get to bitcoin, so they might already be starting with 2-6 weeks of back up funds yet when they get started with bitcoin, they likely need to start thinking abut their back up funds in a context of protecting their bitcoin, while at the same time building up the bitcoin, and we can even suggest that back up funds would not need to be as large in the first place until the bitcoin investment grows and grows and grows (presumptively growing from both adding to it and from price appreciations, even though price appreciation is not guaranteed to happen), so then the more and more that bitcoin is growing, the more that there will be a need to protect it from accidentally or purposefully getting tapped into, so back up funds should help with that.. and yeah sometimes cashflow situations can become extreme where the income does not cover all of the expenses, and so in those situations having some cash on hand can end up being quite empowering in terms of giving options and options that include not beign forced to tap into the bitcoin investment at a time that is not completely at your own choosing..
I personally always prefer to balance bitcoin investments with as other investments or assets as you can hold, actually we can divide our income in some parts.
For example, if we divide our income into three parts, and 30% is for investing in Bitcoin and 30% is for stable currency holding (or investing on gold) and as well as others 40% could be used for the expenses. I don't know if this strategy will work for others, but if I follow this approach based on my income, I won't have to face any extra hassle.
Because I have seen many people, and it happened to me in the beginning, who, seeing the potential of Bitcoin, forgot about its volatility and invested most of their income in it. Later, when the market crashes or the price drops and they need their own money, they have to sell the invested holding Bitcoin at a loss and provide a backup to the situation.
So I think if someone invests strategically based on their income with long-term DCA plan, they will be able to successfully execute their investment.
With the mindset you have,I doubt if you will make it to Over-accumulation in Bitcoin because you're busy sorting out Discretional incomes to invest in Gold when you haven't accumulated Bitcoin substantially or come close to Over-accumulation. Diversification to other assets like Gold,Stock & Bond or Real estate isn't bad but since you haven't come close Over-accumulation,i think your Discretional income when available should be used to buy Bitcoin consistently for the next 4-10 years until you have attain Over-accumulation before Diversifying.
9. Post 66038338 (unedited backup) (by Loyang) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 10:34:19 CET 2025) in JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas:
I personally always prefer to balance bitcoin investments with as other investments or assets as you can hold, actually we can divide our income in some parts.
For example, if we divide our income into three parts, and 30% is for investing in Bitcoin and 30% is for stable currency holding (or investing on gold) and as well as others 40% could be used for the expenses.
Your comment is very meaningless and through this comment of yours a new person can create a wrong idea in him. Because a person first needs to meet his personal needs or family expenses. If a person divides his income like this then it will never be the right method. We need discretionary income to invest. If a person spends almost the entire amount of his income to meet his family expenses or personal expenses and at the end if he has $10 discretionary income then he can invest. First a person should focus on his family expenses or personal expenses.
A person should not divide his income like this. A person should divide his discretionary income. Where to invest is completely his personal matter but we think a person should never invest in any other type of currency except Bitcoin. All these currencies are very risky and the risk of losing money is very high
But I don't see anything wrong with the way @MINERI said someone can divide their money. The 30% that he dedicated to bitcoin investment can be considered as the discretionary income. He made provision for holding in stablecoins which I believe is almost the same thing as someone having reserve funds or emergency funds in fiat but this one is digital dollar, which can be used to settle problems that may arise. He also allocated percentage for family needs. He didn't advocate for altcoins investment, so I don't see any reason why you should talk down on what he said.
Gost's comment may be a bit confusing, but I think that what @|MINER| said may not be the right approach to me. Because first we have to find out our expenses. If after spending we get some discretionary income then maybe we can invest with that. |MINER| He mentioned investing with his income which will never be the right approach in terms of investment. Many, many more money is spent than the amount of expenses that can be estimated in a month or week. If we invest in advance then if we need more money in a week or month then maybe we will have to break the investment or if we have an emergency fund then we will have to take money from the emergency fund. This will never be the right approach
What will be best for a person is that first of all a person should have the importance of proper financial management. From his income, he should find discretionary income through proper financial management and invest with that discretionary income. This will be the best investment method for an investor and will be very low risk.
10. Post 66037433 (unedited backup) (by 7juju) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 01:00:25 CET 2025) in JJG’s Outline of Bitcoin Investment Ideas:
I personally always prefer to balance bitcoin investments with as other investments or assets as you can hold, actually we can divide our income in some parts.
For example, if we divide our income into three parts, and 30% is for investing in Bitcoin and 30% is for stable currency holding (or investing on gold) and as well as others 40% could be used for the expenses.
Your comment is very meaningless and through this comment of yours a new person can create a wrong idea in him. Because a person first needs to meet his personal needs or family expenses. If a person divides his income like this then it will never be the right method. We need discretionary income to invest. If a person spends almost the entire amount of his income to meet his family expenses or personal expenses and at the end if he has $10 discretionary income then he can invest. First a person should focus on his family expenses or personal expenses.
A person should not divide his income like this. A person should divide his discretionary income. Where to invest is completely his personal matter but we think a person should never invest in any other type of currency except Bitcoin. All these currencies are very risky and the risk of losing money is very high
But I don't see anything wrong with the way @MINERI said someone can divide their money. The 30% that he dedicated to bitcoin investment can be considered as the discretionary income. He made provision for holding in stablecoins which I believe is almost the same thing as someone having reserve funds or emergency funds in fiat but this one is digital dollar, which can be used to settle problems that may arise. He also allocated percentage for family needs. He didn't advocate for altcoins investment, so I don't see any reason why you should talk down on what he said.