Yes, if we match the equation by winning from the first match of this game, then of course the Indian women team is most likely to win in the fifth match. Because since this fourth match, the Indian women's team gave a very big target, but the Sri Lanka women team was moving forward with a win but the rapid fall of wickets put more pressure on the Sri Lanka women team. As a result, the Sri Lanka team lost because even though the top order batsmen could have performed normally, if the pair of Imesha Dulani and Harshitha could have lasted for a long time, then the Sri Lanka women team could have survived by winning and it was possible to make up for the 30-run deficit at the last minute. But here is the weak point, the loss of the Sri Lanka women team in the fourth match.

India women outstanding performance in 4th match of series winning back to back four consistent matches and lead the 5 matches series with 4-0. Indian score huge runs on board in this match. While chasing down the huge 200 plus total Sri Lanka women only managed to score 191 runs and lost the match by 30 runs short. The man of The Match is Smriti Mandhana scored a well deserved half century and out after scoring 80 runs from just 48 balls and Indian women to win this match easily. I think indian women will whitewashed Sri lanka women by winning the fifth match of series because india women chance of winning the match is high.

Today Smriti Mandhana provide an amazing start to the team India, played the innings of 80 runs close to her century and that was she hitting shots that was wonderful and with the help of these hits, she becomes the forth women to score 10,000 International runs. And she became the second Indian women to have this record.

 In past the first Indian women to score was Mithali Raj, leading the chart with  10,868 runs. However, if we talk about today's game so Shafali Verma also provide an essential support, making 79 important runs.

This fourth T20 match was quite interesting and it was also quite important because the two teams between which it took place were India Women and Sri Lanka Women. The special thing about this match is that the Sri Lankan team should have won this match in any case because the previous matches before this were all in the name of India Women. The story of this match is that the Indian team got to bat first in which their player scored 221 runs in this 20 over match with a very relaxed mind in which only two of their player were out.

Smriti Mandhana who is the player of the match scored 80 run off 48  ball. Apart from this the rest of their players also showed a good response together. If Sri Lanka were to be batted, they also tried their best to win this match because they have faced failure in the previous matches. In this match, they tried to win, which made their start look quite good, in which Chamari  Athapaththu scored 52 runs but despite this, he faced failure in the fourth match as well, which resulted in him not winning any of the four T20 matches.

Yeah, In a T20 game between India Women defeated Sri Lanka Women by 30 runs. India Women opens inning first with Smriti Mandhana and Shafli Verma and both the openers give a very positive start to the team and Smriti Mandhana played a memorable inning of 80 runs and also Shafali played a well knock of 79 runs and in middle order Richa Ghosh played a well inning of 40 runs and also Harmanpreet Kaur scores 16 runs and remain not out and at the end of the innings India set a huge target of 222 runs for Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka Women opens inning with Hasini Perera and Chamari Athapaththu and both the openers give a very positive start to the team and Hasini played a well inning of 33 runs and also Chamari played a well inning of 52 runs and after that Imesha Dulani continued the game with the well inning of 29 runs and also Nilakshika Silva scores 23 runs but after putting great efforts Sri Lanka don't succeed to chase the huge target of 222 runs and scores only 191 runs at the end of the innings and India won the game by 30 runs.

Now with the win in this fourth match of series India w leading by 4–0 but Sri Lankan w done good resistance and have good total on board 191 for 6 is good improvement from them after having worst batting in early matches they are doing good for losing cause.

412 runs in match by both teams with Smirit Mandhana and Shafali Verma have their names in record books while Smirit Mandhana is now fourth women cricketer to cross 10,000 runs in all formats it's amazing stuff from these women in blue which making things proud able for every Indian from start till end Indian w were in complete control of game and series.

Well, it is obvious that Indian women were to give a better performance, but what surprised me was the Sri Lankan batting in this match. Even though they lost the match but still they made 191 runs and it was a good batting display.

The opening pair had a partnership of over a 50 runs where Chamari Athapaththu also completed his half century. After that the rest of the batsmen also spend good time on the wickets and make a good runs in the region of 20s and it was good overall team. However 221 runs target was too much asking for them.

Outcome of today match was also same as everyone expected. India is now leading T20 format competition with four victories. In first three matches, India begun with bowling first while in today match, they started with batting first. In this match, Sri Lanka played much better than previous three matches and I thought Sri Lanka women squads would defeat India women squad but target score was quite high. Shafali Verma and Smriti Mandhana batters both were top supporter of this match and both built long lasting batting partnership and both collected 80 and 79 scores respectively. Sri Lanka batters were reached almost 200 scores and their bottom order displayed weak support and Sri Lanka women squad faced another defeat by 30 scores. Vaishnavi Sharma and Arundhati Reddy also played key role in victory and both picked up 2 and 2 wickets.

India with another victory, they scored 200+ in their innings and of course it is impossible for Sri Lanka as we can see based on the previous games and their performances, we can analyse that if they can't reach to 130 in previous games so how could they chase this big total ?

These were the thoughts before their innings but then they really surprised us all. Their players were doing power hitting, not standing for long time on pitch like Indian players and focus on partnership, their motive was to do power hitting and then back to the Pavilion, somehow they played well today.

If anyone click on a gambling site and just gamble all his money at once instead of using it little by little, definitely the person will only spend short period of time on the gambling site. In fact, the person will not use up to 5 to 10 minutes bit use around 1 to 2 minutes. But some people said it is fun but I think if they win money like 2 or 3 times of the money they use to gamble, it can be fun for them. But if they lose, it can not be fun but they will accept their losses.

The more smoothly a website functions, the more load it will put on the server. So it can also create a problem for a gambling site, so gambling sites do not launch Apps. And with the amount of gambling apps constantly coming into the market, even if you install gambling apps frequently, you may face malware attacks. Because of the weakness of people towards gambling, many scammers will create such scamming funnels. So it is better not to download any apps for gambling.

Each government has their ways they take money from citizens. The least place I think government are lenient with tax is gambling, even some developed countries don't tax their people from gambling profit but the casinos are heavily tax because they make money from gambling, instead of squeezing their citizens they does that to the casino instead but if they notices people makes money from gambling, they change the rules to tax their people. Sometimes isn't about the tax but to control money in circulation to reduce inflation.

I don't see problem with tax if the government are using it for the cause, tax are way the people give back to the society so everyone cans have a collective benefit through social and basic amenities. It's when the government decide to steal public funds and money meant for development of the country I don't like to see, sadly that's what Nigerian country is trying to enforce but the house of assembly are kicking against the implementation of the bill.

Australia’s captain has already made it clear that the job is done after winning thrid test match and their focus is on winning the fourth Test as well, where Australia look to have a very strong chance given their dominance performance. England are under huge pressure because winning the remaining Tests is absolutely necessary if they want to avoid whitewash and ben stokes surely make some changes. Australia controlling most phases of the series and England struggling for consistency, the momentum is clearly if England continue to play under pressure then they will lose it. Australia also have a great opportunity to maintain a strong position at the top of the World Test Championship standings.

Just look at the market cap of both USDT and USDC, and you will know how many people are invested in which stablecoin. While you will see many controversies about USDT on social media but why when you compare the marketcap of both, the USDC market cap is not even half of the USDT market cap 

What does that analysis tell us? People consider USDT more safer than the USDC but if you ask my personal opinion I would say that if you're  holding stablecoins, better hold half in USDT and half in USDC. That's the safest option.

Many people believe that USDC is safer and better than USDT, but I disagree with that.

As we know, rumors about USDT are nothing new and have been circulating for the past decade. But as we can see, despite those rumors, USDT remains the largest and most widely trusted stablecoin to date.

If USDC is safer and better, why hasn't it gained more market trust and surpassed USDT? USDT dominance in the stablecoin market is no accident, and there are no signs that its leading position is threatened as the gap between it and other stablecoins remains very large. Think about that.

If our goal is only for the short term then USDT is certainly a good choice and more flexible so that it can make it easier for us when we want to do trading especially USDT is widely used in various Crypto exchanges and makes USDT have high liquidity compared to other stablecoins, but if we want to be safer and more transparent then choose USDC especially USDC has clear regulations and they also often audit USDC reserves so it will be safer if we make USDC as our personal reserves in the long term, both stablecoins each have their own advantages but their goals are the same to maintain value to remain stable.