Last update: 2025-07-30_Wed_17.00h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
|MINER| receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. |MINER|
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "|MINER|" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 65638910 (unedited backup) (by Fuso.hp) (scraped on Wed Jul 30 16:58:19 CEST 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
Here, rather than the balancing issue of the West Indies team, the main reason behind their defeat is that they are currently far behind the Australian team in both batting and bowling.
Yes, there was a time when the West Indies team used to perform competitively with all the teams in the T20 format. I would call that time the Golden Age of the West Indies, especially when legendary players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were in their team. However, I wouldn't say that the West Indies team played very badly in this series. They tried their best to keep their batting lineup good, although there were some shortcomings in their bowling performance.
You are right main problem for West Indies is not just about balancing their team but more about how much better Australia is at both hitting and throwing ball right now which is why they are losing.
It is true that the West Indies had Golden Age in T20 cricket when amazing players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were playing and they could beat almost anyone. But even though they tried hard with their batting in this series their bowling was not very good. This shows how hard it is for team to get back to being top level after their best players retire.
When they failed to win any of the match against Australia in this tour, it is no longer understood that the team is in a bad state. The aspects that seem weak to me as the reason for the poor performance of the West Indies team at the moment are their lack of experience, especially the lack of consistency of player in the team. If the top order of the team fails, it creates pressure on the middle order. If the wicket is uncertain, then there is no possibility of the team scoring high. Another big problem is that the bowling unit is weak, due to which the West team has not been able to secure a win against Australia.
Australia created a batting-friendly wicket, which gave the batsmen of both teams a good advantage and we saw big runs in every match. As Australia has quality batsmen, so it is difficult for any team to win against this team. West Indies tried but could not win any match. Since it was a five-match T20 series, West Indies should have won at least one of them. However, even though West Indies lost every match by a big margin against Australia, they must have learned something from this series and when they announce their team against Australia in the future, they must think about it and announce the team with their best players.
The T20 World Cup is ahead, so if West Indies do not prepare well from now, then their chances of doing well in the T20 World Cup are low.
2. Post 65637834 (unedited backup) (by GigaBit) (scraped on Wed Jul 30 09:36:55 CEST 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
Here, rather than the balancing issue of the West Indies team, the main reason behind their defeat is that they are currently far behind the Australian team in both batting and bowling.
Yes, there was a time when the West Indies team used to perform competitively with all the teams in the T20 format. I would call that time the Golden Age of the West Indies, especially when legendary players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were in their team. However, I wouldn't say that the West Indies team played very badly in this series. They tried their best to keep their batting lineup good, although there were some shortcomings in their bowling performance.
You are right main problem for West Indies is not just about balancing their team but more about how much better Australia is at both hitting and throwing ball right now which is why they are losing.
It is true that the West Indies had Golden Age in T20 cricket when amazing players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were playing and they could beat almost anyone. But even though they tried hard with their batting in this series their bowling was not very good. This shows how hard it is for team to get back to being top level after their best players retire.
When they failed to win any of the match against Australia in this tour, it is no longer understood that the team is in a bad state. The aspects that seem weak to me as the reason for the poor performance of the West Indies team at the moment are their lack of experience, especially the lack of consistency of player in the team. If the top order of the team fails, it creates pressure on the middle order. If the wicket is uncertain, then there is no possibility of the team scoring high. Another big problem is that the bowling unit is weak, due to which the West team has not been able to secure a win against Australia.
3. Post 65637659 (unedited backup) (by Publictalk792) (scraped on Wed Jul 30 08:18:13 CEST 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
Here, rather than the balancing issue of the West Indies team, the main reason behind their defeat is that they are currently far behind the Australian team in both batting and bowling.
Yes, there was a time when the West Indies team used to perform competitively with all the teams in the T20 format. I would call that time the Golden Age of the West Indies, especially when legendary players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were in their team. However, I wouldn't say that the West Indies team played very badly in this series. They tried their best to keep their batting lineup good, although there were some shortcomings in their bowling performance.
You are right main problem for West Indies is not just about balancing their team but more about how much better Australia is at both hitting and throwing ball right now which is why they are losing.
It is true that the West Indies had Golden Age in T20 cricket when amazing players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were playing and they could beat almost anyone. But even though they tried hard with their batting in this series their bowling was not very good. This shows how hard it is for team to get back to being top level after their best players retire.
4. Post 65637364 (unedited backup) (by laijsica) (scraped on Wed Jul 30 04:09:07 CEST 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
At the beginning I will prove you wrong, the series was hosted in West Indies and it was West Indies' home ground. In this case Australia did not play with home ground advantage but their opposite team West Indies played with home ground advantage. Still they could not win a single match in the series.
The main problem of West Indies team is the lack of balance in the team. We know or have realized that West Indies batting lineup is quite strong but their bowling lineup is very weak. You can plan any kind of plan against their bowlers and you will be successful in the plan. They have been whitewashed at home against Bangladesh before and now by Australia. This proves that West Indies' dominance is now over in the cricket world, especially in T20 cricket.
Here, rather than the balancing issue of the West Indies team, the main reason behind their defeat is that they are currently far behind the Australian team in both batting and bowling.
Yes, there was a time when the West Indies team used to perform competitively with all the teams in the T20 format. I would call that time the Golden Age of the West Indies, especially when legendary players like Chris Gayle and Daren Sammy were in their team. However, I wouldn't say that the West Indies team played very badly in this series. They tried their best to keep their batting lineup good, although there were some shortcomings in their bowling performance.
Yes, I miss those days when legendary players like Chris Gayle, Dwayne Bravo, Kieron Pollard and Darren Sammy had a great time for the West Indies team and their feats were appreciated all over the world. You have compared that time with the golden era. Yes, I agree with you and their efforts to take the players and the team to a strong position in those days took their cricket to a better level. The next generation of players are more hardworking but the number of star players among them is gradually decreasing and the team is failing to give the best performance compared to that time.
Currently the strength of the players and the batting line of the West Indies team is performing good but they have played much better against a great team like Australia. Although West Indies did not win despite coming very close to winning, they are improving in both bowling and batting.
5. Post 65637008 (unedited backup) (by stadus) (scraped on Wed Jul 30 00:21:25 CEST 2025) in What makes casinos necessary to be regulated? :
Yeap, and this is why most of we always choose to those casino's which have beem regualated I mean which have a good certificate from the top license provider in gambling. Even, to be honest, I prefer playing games in non-kyc verification and decentralized casinos, but at the same time I consider it risky to that extent because they have no liability and can vanish at any time.
At the same time, if we notice that regulated casinos have many more features and games to enjoy than non-regulated or decentralized casinos.
They’re fun to play with because we get to enjoy the main reason why we prefer crypto over fiat when gambling , no KYC requirements. But of course, the risk is high. If one day we get lucky, win big, and the casino decides to freeze our winnings, there’s nothing much we can do. The government won’t help since these sites aren’t under their jurisdiction. That’s the only real danger I see. The best way to minimize it is by playing on highly reputable casinos, even if they’re unregulated, because reputation matters more than a license. Once a casino ruins its name, it’s basically out of business.
6. Post 65631966 (unedited backup) (by TheUltraElite) (scraped on Mon Jul 28 18:00:14 CEST 2025) in What makes casinos necessary to be regulated? :
I think casinos are not regulated just to retain fiat payment methods or those users, but rather to prevent money laundering. Sometimes we see issues of money laundering even against regulated casinos, so at least the government may be regulating casinos as necessary to prevent money laundering.
Yes, it is possible to remain non-certified and non-regulated, but ask yourself how many uncertified casinos do you feel comfortable gambling at without any hesitation? This is why casinos are currently being regulated as necessary.
Actually an unregulated casino has more chances of getting into an exit scam than a regulated casino, from what I feel. But this might not always be true.
We can understand that the objective is to control money laundering but often people who are looking for anonymity are flocking in crypto based casinos and thus their effort is counter-productive.
There is also the question of many casinos being used for offshore trading and there are fiat based casinos who are involved in it but everyone gives it no attention.
7. Post 65627659 (unedited backup) (by MarangoZ) (scraped on Sun Jul 27 13:37:07 CEST 2025) in Are online Casinos more rigged than physical Casinos like in Las Vegas?:
Honestly, you'll find many more scam casinos online than you would in Las Vegas, but I think it's much easier to stay away from them.
Here online you will find many scams as well as many reputable casinos whose legit reviews are available online. If you talk about stake, jackclub, dueltbit, rollbit etc casinos then most of them are licensed by good companies and are well reputable.
And besides, another simple thing here is that before you gamble, you should pay attention to which games provider the game is from. Because most casinos use games from companies like Pragmatic Play and Evolution, which are not actually manipulated.
yeah that makes sense there’s definitely more scam sites online but like you said it’s easier to avoid them if you do a bit of research
checking for legit licenses game providers like pragmatic or evolution and reading real reviews can go a long way.
8. Post 65627389 (unedited backup) (by God Of Thunder) (scraped on Sun Jul 27 11:19:37 CEST 2025) in 🔥 Sunfirecasino.com — 🎰 Slot Multiplier Contest 💥 | 💵 $300 Prize Pool:
Courtesy tag to regular players.
Coppied from Little Mouse
xLays
Beparanf
Bitinity
oant
iv4n
Patikno
Maddd
mv1986
roycilik
dyingatheist
jayce
hillowner45
xGennady
TravelMug
rafaloko
Jating
hopenotlate
Ammar M. A.
Little Mouse
Odohu
Faizan Zen
BossJumong
freedomgo
Baofeng
Dump3er
|MINER|
PX-Z
memehunter
Unknown Op
dimonstration
Mr. Magkaisa
Potato Chips
9. Post 65621548 (unedited backup) (by Swordsoffreedom) (scraped on Fri Jul 25 17:11:43 CEST 2025) in Can Bitcoin kill other crypto?:
Bitcoin dominance has recovered but now it is at 60.8%. Now I am not really sure how the Altcoin season will come with this. But yes, I will agree with you that if Bitcoin dominance falls below forty percent then the altcoin season will rule the market.
Many altcoins saw a significant price increase as BTC.D dropped from 64% to 59%, so it is understandable that they corrected and bitcoin dominance increased slightly.
I really only believe that altcoin season won't come if bitcoin dominance can rise back up to 65% again. Otherwise, sooner or later it will have to drop below 50% and altcoin season will explode.
Actually, you are making a wrong assumption here. Because I never said that altcoin season should not come. What I want to say here is that the situation in the altcoin market makes it unlikely that there will be an altcoin season this season. And this is mainly as a warning because people will invest for FOMO and end up facing losses.
But I would definitely be happy if the altcoin season comes because I have some tiny investments in altcoins and I am optimistic that a good profit can be made during the altcoin season.
Many people make the mistake of relying on the past (market cycles), thinking that everything needs to be repeated exactly to the last detail. Just one small change, they immediately assume that history has changed, it is no longer true...bla...bla..bla..And that is exactly what is happening. Just because altcoins haven't been growing with bitcoin all this time, or altcoin season hasn't arrived yet when the bull season is about to end...they immediately conclude that it won't arrive. But for me, and I said this many times in the 2022 bear market, when something keeps repeating itself and becomes too predictable, it needs to change.
I believe altcoin season will come but there will be a certain delay and it will only come when not too many people believe in it anymore.
10. Post 65616779 (unedited backup) (by Swordsoffreedom) (scraped on Thu Jul 24 11:05:37 CEST 2025) in Can Bitcoin kill other crypto?:
Currently, I can see that Bitcoin has a dominance of 59.7% .
And at the same time I do not think that the altcoin season will come in the market due to the decrease in Bitcoin's dominance by only around 4.69%.
Because before this, when the market created its first bull market in December 2024, Bitcoin's dominance in the market was around 54%. Even then, we did not see a very good performance of altcoins in the market.
And now those who are saying that a alt season will come even it is after bear trap, this seems ridiculous to me. I would say it's just a FOMO of the market.
Bitcoin dominance has dropped more than 4% but also brought ETH to $3k8, 3x higher since the 2024 low, or many meme coins like Pengu have increased 10x since their lowest bottom. What happens if DOM drops below 54% or below 40%?
If you study money flows in previous cycles, you will see that money always flows into bitcoin first. So comparing DOM of December 2024 with now is not accurate, because at that time money was pouring into bitcoin. So it is no surprise that altcoin prices are unlikely to rise at that time. But if BTC.D drops from 64% to 54% from now, that's a different story.
Since you're only investing in bitcoin, it's not hard to see why you don't want altcoin season to come. But the market does not move according to our thoughts and desires. Just because we believe and hope it won't happen, doesn't mean it definitely won't happen. Let time tell.
11. Post 65615926 (unedited backup) (by CryptoYar) (scraped on Thu Jul 24 03:15:49 CEST 2025) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
Actually, I expected the result of this match to be that the Indian women's team would win because they have performed well in terms of batting and bowling throughout the series.
And many thought that maybe the Indian women's team would lose to the England women's team because of the loss in the second match. But what actually happened in the second match was that due to rain, the match was changed from an ODI format to a T20 format by applying the DLS method and here the England women's team got the full benefit and that is why they were able to win the second match. But luckily the weather was good in this match and the Indian women's team was able to give their best performance. Even though the match was a close one, the Indian women's team still gave a great match.
I also expected Indian women team to win because they had been playing so well and they really delivered. That second match where rain and DLS method changed it to T20 seems to have given England women team unfair advantage showing how much outside factors can mess with game true outcome. Luckily weather was good for this deciding match letting India women team play their best and even though it was close game their win really showed how skilled and tough they are.
12. Post 65615357 (unedited backup) (by terrific) (scraped on Wed Jul 23 23:05:13 CEST 2025) in How can you enjoy the game when you are losing?:
Me either, I don't like when I am losing. But we can always hide in that reasoning that we're learning something new just to justify and flee from that disappointing moment.
Actually, I want to say here that this is not only your case, but also the same in my case and I also believe that there are many more people here who feel this way when they lose while gambling and at the same time the next expression is also the same.
That is a big possibility that many others are also feeling the same way.
That doesn't happen to all of us but we have to enjoy still even if we're on the losing side and we can move on from that.
Accepting the reality that sometimes we win and many times we'll lose is hard but, you'll get used to it.
Actually, it would be wrong to say that it doesn't happen to all of us. Because I think most people in gambling even though their total loss amount will be much higher, they still win in some cases. Personally, I think no one has worse luck than me because I face losses most of the time, but even then, the occasional win that comes through gives me the motivation to move forward.
We can tell that our losses are worse than the others. Because that's what we feel when we're on that.
And so, that's the reason they are not too hyped with the wins that they get back. Because if it's about breaking even, they're not even close that.
With your case that it gives you motivation to go on and keep doing it, then that's better for me.
13. Post 65615199 (unedited backup) (by Raflesia) (scraped on Wed Jul 23 22:22:43 CEST 2025) in How can you enjoy the game when you are losing?:
That doesn't happen to all of us but we have to enjoy still even if we're on the losing side and we can move on from that.
Accepting the reality that sometimes we win and many times we'll lose is hard but, you'll get used to it.
Actually, it would be wrong to say that it doesn't happen to all of us. Because I think most people in gambling even though their total loss amount will be much higher, they still win in some cases. Personally, I think no one has worse luck than me because I face losses most of the time, but even then, the occasional win that comes through gives me the motivation to move forward.
True, but ultimately, I feel it's a bit inaccurate to say this doesn't happen to everyone. The fact is, all gamblers will experience losses, even if the amount may vary. Still, the standard for losing is clearly felt in this case, and it can become a situation that continues to occur and is considered normal because it's a certainty.
Gambling carries the risk of losing, and it's undeniable that this is the reality. So, I don't think it's about whether we enjoy it or not. We certainly don't expect to lose, even though it's a certainty. We should try to accept it as a risk.
This would seem better than saying we enjoy gambling even though we lose.
14. Post 65613812 (unedited backup) (by Smack That Ace) (scraped on Wed Jul 23 15:06:55 CEST 2025) in Can Bitcoin kill other crypto?:
And I don't really think we'll see an altcoin season this season. If we really did see an altcoin season, we would already have some signals going on, like the price of Ethereum maybe crossing its previous all-time high.
And have you checked ETH price, or have you followed ETH ETF and BTC ETF flows in recent days? I just checked them this morning and if I remember correctly BTC ETF inflows are -68 million while ETH ETF inflows are +533 million and Sol is +12 million. Another thing you should know is this has been going on for over a week, not just today. What do you think about this?
Not to mention, BNB also hit a new ATH today after almost 4 years although that's still not a good growth, or XRP also recovered above $3.6.
Agreed that this year's bull season is quite different than every other year but that doesn't mean altcoin season won't come and the market is dedicated to bitcoin. Contrary to you, I never believed in it and never doubted the altcoin season because the crypto industry cannot survive with just bitcoin and bitcoin maximalists.
By the way, I'm quite happy that until now there are still many people who doubt and even don't believe in alt season, the more people who don't believe, the better sign it is for alt season.