Secure in terms of what and from whom? They are both secure enough, but these days you might have more issues changing USDT to EUR for example.
But you might want to explain what properties you need for a stablecoin, as it also could be pegged to other things then dollars.

And anything in this space is experimental and risky. If not by shady reserves, then just via 0d exploits and noobs vulnerabilities to social engineering.

Personally i trust way less to tether after they decided not to comply with EU regulations or be more transparent.

Absolutely true. It's unfair to say that Bitcoin is a haven for criminals. Even in fiat there's a lot of crime, but why is the focus solely on Bitcoin? Bitcoin is a highly transparent blockchain technology.

It's important to emphasize that every developing technology has both positive and negative sides, and this applies to all technologies, whether email, social media, crypto, or even fiat, which can be used for criminal purposes by certain individuals. So let's look at it fairly: Bitcoin offers many benefits for all of us. We can't avoid criminals exploiting Bitcoin, but what's certain is that Bitcoin provides many benefits to society.

These two stable big industry coins are not safe to hold but majority might not be aware of this. You are only holding them for the sake of shifting away from the volatility market to maintain value but they are not that safe to hold. You coin can be frozen at any time without your consent. Don't argue with me cost you can always do your finding. I am not immuned to this because I am also holding it lol.
Who is going to safe us now?

Bitcoin is a global asset, which allows criminals to easily transact with it. It can only identify the wallet but not the person, so criminals can transact anonymously. Bitcoin has become a potential source for global asset transactions. Due to the depreciation of fiat or the limitations of regional monetary systems, the demand and acceptance of this digital asset is increasing across regional boundaries.

Every positive impact will have a negative impact, so you need to learn about each issue and accept only the positive side. Anyone involved in crime can commit a crime in any way if given the opportunity. Focusing on a specific issue is purposeful.

The USDT has had enough trouble of its own for years. However, being a stablecoin linked to the crypto world, I believe it will not be affected, as it has held the number 1 spot for so long. As for USDC, it has passed virtually all government clearances and regional acceptance, so it's technically safer. What I do is hold my assets in two of them in case of unforeseen circumstances, and I do it 50:50 now.

What I won't do is hold my crypto assets in other stablecoins. I view them as riskier than the two (USDT & USDC).

To be honest, the West Indies team did not perform very well in the first Test match, getting all out for just 167 runs. Because of this, most people thought that they would not be able to bat well against New Zealand in the second innings against the target of 531 runs. But the West Indies batsmen batted very responsibly in the second innings. The West Indies batsmen batted very responsibly from the beginning against the target of 531 runs given by New Zealand. The West Indies batsmen batted very responsibly and they were able to draw the Test match against New Zealand. Shai Hope and Justin Greaves are the two batsmen who helped the West Indies team draw the match against New Zealand. New Zealand is undoubtedly a stronger team than the West Indies. But the West Indies team was able to draw the Test match because of their responsible performance in the second innings.

In the northern part of Nigeria, where bandits are kidnaping people everyday I've never heard that they have demanded for cryptocurrency as ransom, not even for once, maybe because they are bunch of illiterates that are illegally armed with AK-47. The point that I'm making is that there are countless crimes that have been committed with fiat yet some group of people will intentionally or ignorantly be giving Bitcoin a bad name.

Criminals are looking for easy tools to perfect their crimes and they will use any means that suits their type of crimes. It could be through cryptocurrency, fiat, weapons or physical combat, all the things I mentioned have always been in existence before cryptocurrency. Maybe that is why much concentration is on crypto being the latest tool for criminal acts. Bitcoin haters should know that it has far more benefits than what criminals are using it for.

Even a few years ago, things weren't like this! But now there is literally no control over what adults should see and what minors can see! Even if one doesn't gamble, they are bound to see these gambling ads eventually! Not to mention how big sports/movie figures are involved in these promotions, well teenagers can't help following their idols. What I really hate is the easy accessibility to these sites despite being illegal! And I'm not talking only about gambling! For example take po*n sites, they would just ask whether we are 18+ or not, there aren't any actual checks happening, you just click yes and you are able to access it! No need to bypass, use vpn proxy, hide your location or anything, just search it, visit the link, and have quick access.

That's what I exactly thinking about English side that Atleast they will try to draw things if failed to take dominance over Aussies as it will somehow safe thier team dignity at such big Ashes rivalry, it's true that currently Aussies were dominating and I taught they will struggle like English at thier innings, but surprisingly from top to bottom rest of player contribute enough to total score and while still having handosme number of wicket definitely indicate thier upper hand over situation, but let's wait for next day as it will somehow clear things.

Yes, Australia has done that, so far Australia has a lead of 44 runs. Australia ended the first day of their first innings on 378 runs, which means if they can take a few more runs lead tomorrow for the next four wickets, that will be a bonus for the second innings. However, it seems that if England cannot bat in the second innings like they did in the first, the amount of lead Australia takes in their first innings will become dangerous for England. England's batting average was very poor, especially two to three batsmen who played well enough, which allowed England to score 334 runs. If England cannot score runs in the second innings like they did in the first innings, then England will definitely lose and there is no chance of a draw.

KYC may be mandatory in majority of the places. But in my opinion, where I live, it has lots of gray areas to consider. First of all, gambling is illegal at my place (but people still do gamble without any problems most of the time), so you see they ones that run here doesn't operate legally. Also many of them are straight forward, don't have to worry about license or even KYC, just register, deposit and play! That's how it's been here! That's what attracted the young mass to start gambling to these sites!

Why do you think that gambling strategy does not work there are so many testimonies of people using these strategies and making profits from it. Luck is what will make your strategy makes a lot of sense and without it, everything we might have been doing can become a waste of time. People are making money from gambling but the idea of trying to get everything that had been lost in gambling can become a problem for gamblers that don't understand what they will do that will be profitable for them. Luck is the major and what will make anybody to be profitable.