In sports betting, who do you really trust? The tipsters who show profit for a while, or yourself believing that in the long run you can be profitable if you keep learning.
Many bettors just follow tipsters blindly. If they see a winning streak, they assume the tipster really knows what he’s doing. But most of the time those results don’t last long. A few bad weeks and the profit disappears. So I’m curious how others see this. Is it better to trust someone else’s picks, or focus on developing your own analysis even if it takes longer to become profitable?
I actually bet on those games or sports that I have basic knowledge about, such as cricket and football, and I have knowledge about both of these and I can explore them, and I think that by analyzing some simple facts, especially how a team's previous performances were and also knowing whether all their players are fit or whether any players are injured or which players have returned from injury, it is actually easier to make predictions and you can rely on your own predictions.
And what I basically do is that I give more priority to my own analysis when placing a bet, and sometimes if I feel in doubt,
I compare it with the analysis of some analysts.
What happens when you look at other analysts and their analysts go against your pick? Do you skip the bet or do you try to make a logical choice based on your own reasoning? Imagine you’re in doubt and end up choosing the opposite because the tipster seems to have better analysis, so you follow their pick. But in the end, your original pick actually wins. This has happened to me before and when it does, I feel a lot of regret for not trusting myself especially in sports where I have knowledge.
Especially with the sport that you have better understanding but because someone or you read somewhere that the tipster is good then you choose to follow his lead then lose, that's regretful which leave a mark with your emotions, if you follow your own understanding the outcome for your gambling is for your favor but still an experienced to let go if you would choose to move forward and continue with your gambling.
Actually, I don't see anything bad here. As far as I can tell, when a team makes bad comments, it's natural for them to hear criticism from fans, but it's better if it's constructive and not a personal attack.
But the responsibility of the players is to perform well and if they fail from there, it is natural that they will have to listen to criticism. And most people will have to do more with big teams, it is also natural because big teams are more successful, with more win.
Players should already be used to this type of behaviour and learn how to deal with it, even personal attacks in terms of a player underperforming below what fans were expecting from him. Some take bullying down to their level on social media, and it lasts for a couple of days before it calms down. I just see all those types of reactions as what have been normalised in events like football; it's indeed no longer new.
In sports betting, who do you really trust? The tipsters who show profit for a while, or yourself believing that in the long run you can be profitable if you keep learning.
Many bettors just follow tipsters blindly. If they see a winning streak, they assume the tipster really knows what he’s doing. But most of the time those results don’t last long. A few bad weeks and the profit disappears. So I’m curious how others see this. Is it better to trust someone else’s picks, or focus on developing your own analysis even if it takes longer to become profitable?
I actually bet on those games or sports that I have basic knowledge about, such as cricket and football, and I have knowledge about both of these and I can explore them, and I think that by analyzing some simple facts, especially how a team's previous performances were and also knowing whether all their players are fit or whether any players are injured or which players have returned from injury, it is actually easier to make predictions and you can rely on your own predictions.
And what I basically do is that I give more priority to my own analysis when placing a bet, and sometimes if I feel in doubt,
I compare it with the analysis of some analysts.
What happens when you look at other analysts and their analysts go against your pick? Do you skip the bet or do you try to make a logical choice based on your own reasoning? Imagine you’re in doubt and end up choosing the opposite because the tipster seems to have better analysis, so you follow their pick. But in the end, your original pick actually wins. This has happened to me before and when it does, I feel a lot of regret for not trusting myself especially in sports where I have knowledge.
Gambling is something to enjoy. So I deposit a small amount and test the games and learn about them. Because it would be a waste of time to learn about those games from YouTube or any other medium, at that time I can enjoy the fun of playing the game, even though I will not know the rules of the game completely at first. If any of my friends know about this without searching for it on social media, I can certainly ask them, but I don't have the patience to learn about the game through various researches.
I will not directly say this all will be waste of time because in some cases I found like this if I didn't get the games function fully then I couldn't enjoy much on the games so that I think even in the beginning time if we put some time to understand about the games that will not be much waste but yes that will be must waste of time if we put our time for seeking strategies or the trick for the wining in the games. Becuase there is no strategy or tricks which will helps us to win in gambling as because we know gambling is fully depends on the luck.
I believe it is a good move to take a little bit of research on a new casino game, particularly when one is playing with a real money. It does not imply spending hours on watching videos and reading extensive manuals, but at least knowledge of the rules, functions, and rewarding style would help to avoid some unnecessary errors. The game can also be tested with a little amount that can also be learned in the process of enjoying the game. I also concur with that as there is no use in pursuing so-called winning tricks, since gambling remains just as much of a luck game, but one should never squander time learning about the game itself.
The hardest reality in the world is that we all get so busy with our own business that we don't have time to know where our friends are and how they are doing in their life.
In some cases it is better to accept them and in some cases we should maintain bonding with friends. For example, in many cases it is seen that the situation between friends becomes worse due to excessive gambling, then I think it is better to stay away from such friends. And in many cases it is seen that if you teach a friend how to gamble, when that friend loses the gambling game due to his carelessness, he blames the other person.
That’s actually a very good point, I would never involve my friends in gambling. It should always be a personal decision, made independently without anyone’s influence. If you want to involve your friends in something, it should be something like sports or other positive activities they’ll be grateful for. But under no circumstances should you involve them in something risky where they could lose money, because that could genuinely lead to them blaming you for it.
Of course, anyone that's no longer enjoying the fun in gambling should quit because it shows that he's gambling for profit and that will lead to wrong decisions that will incur big losses for me. I gamble for fun making it difficult for me to chase my losses or feel emotional towards the outcome of my bet.
Personally, I think that those who should actually quit gambling are those who gamble beyond their ability to lose and are addicted to gambling, as well as those who gamble within their ability to lose in terms of amount but cannot entertain themselves from gambling, but instead feel stressed when they face losses.
The fun in gambling lies in gambling with the amount you can avoid to lose. Immediately you are going beyond this then gambling has started to become a problem for you. This is where most people have problem with gambling as they join gambling to make profit and this is why it difficult for them to quit after much loses.
In this case, I also ask them to take a break from gambling because they are not able to do the purpose for which gambling is originally supposed to be played
Taking break in gambling is necessary as this help to curb becoming an addict. It help to regulate the pressure placed on you after loses. Even when you have consistent winning, it is still advisable to take break after a while so you won't be over carried away by your winning and later change your mindset about gambling from fun to profit making.
Of course, anyone that's no longer enjoying the fun in gambling should quit because it shows that he's gambling for profit and that will lead to wrong decisions that will incur big losses for me. I gamble for fun making it difficult for me to chase my losses or feel emotional towards the outcome of my bet.
Personally, I think that those who should actually quit gambling are those who gamble beyond their ability to lose and are addicted to gambling, as well as those who gamble within their ability to lose in terms of amount but cannot entertain themselves from gambling, but instead feel stressed when they face losses.
The fun in gambling lies in gambling with the amount you can avoid to lose. Immediately you are going beyond this them gambling has started to become a problem for you. Although most people join gambling to make profit and this is why it difficult for them to quit after much loses.
In this case, I also ask them to take a break from gambling because they are not able to do the purpose for which gambling is originally supposed to be played, so there is no point in unnecessarily increasing their stress here.
[/quote]
To me, sometimes I feel it even makes you more smarter. We all know the artificial intelligence is just a tool to assist us, so most times there are some things we don’t have ideas about and easiest thing to do is to use the artificial intelligence and it quickly gives us information on what we are trying to know and at the same time enhancing our knowledge about information we are trying to get. There are so many people that has learnt a lot through artificial intelligence not just making the brain ineffective.
Actually, what I wanted to say is that what you are doing should be the correct use of artificial intelligence where artificial intelligence is increasing our efficiency. Where we used to have to explore and spend a lot of time to know specific information, if we can give the right prompt to artificial intelligence, it is possible to get that information within a minute.
But here, if we cannot give the right prompt again, then the matter will actually work the other way around because if we do not give the right prompt, artificial intelligence can give us wrong information. So of course, we have to learn prompt engineering well when using artificial intelligence. And of course, artificial intelligence must be used in a way that doesn't cripple us mentally.
Definitely true, but you know in life, everything has advantages and disadvantages. Ai adds value but when it’s been misused can reduce its benefits. Humans most times are fund of misusing things when they find out it of advantage and it then later turn to affect us negatively.
Good point, As long as you know how to handle things the right way there's advantage that you can gain, though if you treat things in the wrong way then expect that there's an after effect after, like your sentiment if you use AI in everything and not to use your own knowledge thinking that it's already providing answers, there's instances that AI can't produce and you may lead to a wrong direction, better to keep the advantage but still sort things the way you understand it.