Last update: 2026-07-17_Fri_09.48h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

|MINER| receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. |MINER|
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "|MINER|" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66949636 (unedited backup) (by Findingnemo) (scraped on Fri Jul 17 09:44:43 CEST 2026) in Crypto gambling platforms have better cash out systems than the local ones.:

Quote from: |MINER| on July 16, 2026, 06:03:06 PM
It is not just better cashout system but the wide range of deposit methods too, many crypto casinos supports fiat payment too so you can still enjoy the gambling experience to the fullest even with your fiat but I recommend using crypto for seamless UX because it is often reported that there will be delays in deposits and withdrawal of fiat because it is mostly processed through the third party payment processors.
I also have the same opinion that people are not shifting online just for the cash out system, rather in physical casinos you can see that there are limited games within a limitation, but on the other hand the number of games in the online space is huge where people can taste the variety.
At the same time, it is easy to access, allowing you to gamble anytime, anywhere, just by using the internet, without having to travel to a physical casino store. And in terms of trust, online casinos have come a long way, so here too a large amount of people are shifting from physical platforms to online platforms.

Trust factor maybe a thing for the reason for some to stick with physical casinos but not just gambling we are doing almost everything online now so the new generation people used to it, the only thing is they might end up on a scam site that can be avoid if they educate themselves about basic internet security.



2. Post 66948360 (unedited backup) (by 7788bitcoin) (scraped on Thu Jul 16 22:09:19 CEST 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 06:17:16 PM
233 is certainly small target in 44 overs but game of cricket is unpredictable. Situation is changed completely when England lose two wickets early, pressure mounts quickly when the early wickets go. When Indian bowlers have target to defend, particularly in middle overs, they can be deadly.
Well, 233 is toss up to be honest. With India bowlers continuing to pick wickets at regular intervals and not allowing England to build any big partnership, this target is easily defendable. But chocolaty play from England in beginning of the match and Kohli and Iyer's performance ensured that India are still not out.
Actually it is a very small target but the way England team was performing initially it seemed that they might not be able to win this match but now England team is somewhat pressure free even though they have lost four important wickets.

However England still have Joe Root and Jos Buttler and I think if these two can survive then these two can finish this match. England team only need 117 from 26.5 overs which is going to be very easy but England team cannot afford to lose their wickets.
It looked like an easy chase for England, but the pitch was difficult to bat. When England started their chase, Jasprit Bumrah and Prasidh Krishna started by picking early wickets, putting pressure back onto England. Joe Root played an innings of a lifetime, even though Gus Atkinson denied his well deserved century. It is one of the best innings he played this year.



3. Post 66946917 (unedited backup) (by Ahli38) (scraped on Thu Jul 16 14:23:13 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 09:22:47 AM
I don't see how Argentina is the favorite from what I watched in the first half. England got a shot on target and Argentina didn't. Secondly, Argentina played roughly in the first half because they're not able to tactically get the ball from England players.

The second half will produce at least one goal and I expect to see a higher game tempo from England when Saka and Rashford steps into the field. It's still 50/50 for both teams to advance to the finals.
Unfortunately, England were able to play a little bit in the first half but could not maintain it in the second half. Even after they scored the first goal, they were very weak in front of the Argentine attackers.
And the Argentine players did not let go of that weakness, but instead, taking advantage of that weakness, the Argentine team made a remarkable comeback at the very last moment and immediately took the lead. And Argentina's performance basically proves that they are the most favorite team in this World Cup and have the highest chance of winning the World Cup trophy.

As I’ve said before, where I predicted that Argentina would fight very hard under any circumstances. And I suspected that Argentina might put up a very strong fight if they fell behind just as they did against Egypt some time ago. Argentina’s position as the top-ranked team according to FIFA makes me confident that they cannot be underestimated at all given that they have a squad with a steely resolve and exceptional individual skills. England might have felt they had the upper hand after scoring in the 55th minute which briefly put them ahead. But Argentina managed an epic comeback as the match neared its end. And Lionel Messi was a pivotal player in Argentina’s victory in that match. It’s no surprise that he received the highest rating and was named man of the match. Next I’m confident that Argentina will most likely defeat Spain. But we need to keep an eye on how both teams develop to make a more accurate prediction.



4. Post 66946720 (unedited backup) (by Razmirraz) (scraped on Thu Jul 16 13:15:07 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 09:22:47 AM
I don't see how Argentina is the favorite from what I watched in the first half. England got a shot on target and Argentina didn't. Secondly, Argentina played roughly in the first half because they're not able to tactically get the ball from England players.

The second half will produce at least one goal and I expect to see a higher game tempo from England when Saka and Rashford steps into the field. It's still 50/50 for both teams to advance to the finals.
Unfortunately, England were able to play a little bit in the first half but could not maintain it in the second half. Even after they scored the first goal, they were very weak in front of the Argentine attackers.
And the Argentine players did not let go of that weakness, but instead, taking advantage of that weakness, the Argentine team made a remarkable comeback at the very last moment and immediately took the lead. And Argentina's performance basically proves that they are the most favorite team in this World Cup and have the highest chance of winning the World Cup trophy.
It must be admitted, England played very well in the first half, they also managed to create several chances and the peak was when entering the second half, precisely in the 55th minute they took a 1-0 lead after Anthony Gordon managed to capitalize on Morgan Rogers crossing. Following this, Tuchel made a blunder when replacing a forward with a defender, which significantly impacted their attacking creativity. Argentina managed to exploit the gaps in England's defense so that they managed to make a 2-1 comeback which prevented England from advancing to the final.
Previously, Tuchel decision to call up Jordan Henderson, Dan Burns, and Noni Madueke was also considered controversial, while experienced players such as Phil Foden, Cole Palmer, Morgan Gibbs-White, Luke Shaw, TAA, and Maguire were not included in the squad. Tuchel decision to play defensively and field players with minimal experience came at a high price.



5. Post 66946433 (unedited backup) (by Swordsoffreedom) (scraped on Thu Jul 16 11:30:49 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 09:22:47 AM
Unfortunately, England were able to play a little bit in the first half but could not maintain it in the second half. Even after they scored the first goal, they were very weak in front of the Argentine attackers.
And the Argentine players did not let go of that weakness, but instead, taking advantage of that weakness, the Argentine team made a remarkable comeback at the very last moment and immediately took the lead. And Argentina's performance basically proves that they are the most favorite team in this World Cup and have the highest chance of winning the World Cup trophy.

England performed well at the beginning of the match. Their overall performance was also very organized. And they were able to create attacking opportunities. We have seen such gameplay of England in the past matches.

But after securing a 1-0 lead, Tuchel changed his strategy. Suddenly England started playing completely defensively. We have not seen such a strategy in any of England's matches in this World Cup. On the other hand, Scalono went completely attacking. As a result, the pressure on the England players increased. And in the end, England could not survive in the match.

Argentina equalized the match by scoring their first goal in the 85th minute, but even then we thought the match would end in 1-1 in the 90th minute. But the Argentine players did not think of anything other than victory. They secured a 2-1 victory in the 90th minute.



6. Post 66944851 (unedited backup) (by Ruttoshi) (scraped on Wed Jul 15 22:02:07 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 07:53:30 PM
I don't think it's difficult to choose which team is the favorite between England and Argentina because it's actually as clear as day that Argentina's defense and attacking formation are stronger than England's and more importantly, the understanding between the players of Argentina's team is a little higher than that of other teams and that's why they always have a tendency to win and where there is a world's best finisher then there is no question.
So in my opinion, today's favorite team is Argentina. I wouldn't call England a weak team because they have also performed many great matches in a row and that's probably why Argentina has not scored a single goal even after half time.
I don't see how Argentina is the favorite from what I watched in the first half. England got a shot on target and Argentina didn't. Secondly, Argentina played roughly in the first half because they're not able to tactically get the ball from England players.

The second half will produce at least one goal and I expect to see a higher game tempo from England when Saka and Rashford steps into the field. It's still 50/50 for both teams to advance to the finals.



7. Post 66939753 (unedited backup) (by Sithara007) (scraped on Tue Jul 14 13:28:13 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 10:59:03 AM
From my point of view, I would not say that Norway lacked counter-attacks against England, rather I would say that Norway counter-attacked a lot but the attackers of Norway could not finish well, as a result of which they could not score goals even though they counter-attacked many times.

Moreover, England was a much stronger team than them, especially England has many good players who performed in their full form, as a result of which they dominated the match and won the match in the end.

I will tell you the exact moment when Norway lost the game. It happened during the 44th minute of the match. Martin Ødegaard made a brilliant pass to Alexander Sørloth and Sørloth made it to the penalty area. Only one England defender and the goalkeeper was standing in front of Sørloth. By that time, Erling Braut Håland had reached the other side of the box. All Sørloth had to do was to pass the ball on towards Håland, as the later was unmarked. But Sørloth refused to do that and tried to score the goal for himself. The first shot was blocked by the England defender John Stones. slowed down and this allowed Declan Rice and Nico O’Reilly to reach the area. In the end, Norway was unable to score.




8. Post 66932020 (unedited backup) (by hyudien) (scraped on Sun Jul 12 00:36:55 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 10:23:47 PM

But I don't think either team will play safe in the second half, rather I think both teams will play more attacking football. We can already see that even Norway scored another goal, but unfortunately the referee cancelled the goal after a VAR review due to a foul by Hooland.

I think this kind of situation frustrates the flow of a team's match and at the same time weakens them. It remains to be seen whether the Norwegian team can do something similar again.

However, in reality, nothing changed in terms of the game in the second half, both teams still seemed to play safely. England did slowly regain control of the game, but only in terms of ball possession, they had quite a hard time breaking through the Norwegian defense. In contrast, Norway, every opportunity given to them, they turned it into a fairly dangerous opportunity. This match is difficult and whoever scores in this second half, they will likely be able to maintain it until the end of the match.



9. Post 66931969 (unedited backup) (by Nheer) (scraped on Sun Jul 12 00:18:07 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 10:04:09 PM
Norway is a team full of fighters and their victory over Brazil showed that anything is possible. That’s why I also think that the odds on a Norway win are very high and it’s definitely worth taking a chance on them. While the chances aren’t very high, the odds make it worth risking money.

A good position would be enough for Haaland. Wink
No matter what you say, the England team's squad is stronger than the Norwegian team because there are more good players here, I mean star players who are performing in good clubs in European leagues. Harry Kane is not alone here.

So like the way Norway team have full of fighters there the England team also have full of destroyer. And we saw how they recovered themselves with a great goal even after that we saw that multiple time attack. But unfortunately Harry Kane's last goal was offside. Now it's a matter of which team can score more until the end. I can't really say which team will win this match until the end of 90 minutes, at least from this situation.
It's not only about the number of quality players alone but also the teams spirit is very important, how well these players understand one another and play together as a team. England has a very strong squad but they don't really have a strong understanding among the players. Norway has a bit of that and they know they are playing for the attackers and that's how they have been surviving so far.

England is still very much the favorites but they really need to play their best football because Norway is a very stubborn team that can't be underrated at all. The score line already says it, it's 1-1 so it shows that England needs to be careful in this game.



10. Post 66928674 (unedited backup) (by Hazink) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 23:58:43 CEST 2026) in How about casino's implements feature to track past loses & profits sum overtime:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 06:24:54 PM
Obviously, casinos that have these types of features will send a message to people that that casino or platform has high transfer rates and that conscious gamblers will choose such platforms for their gambling.
Some casinos have already been listed which have similar features and I don't think they will want to send out such an email unless, when the member requests it, their mailing are more active when it comes to promotion and security. Anything other than that is' always in rare cases, at least that's what I have observed.



11. Post 66928348 (unedited backup) (by WatChe) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 22:17:25 CEST 2026) in WPL Prediction & Discussion Season -1(2023):

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 07:53:27 PM
It was a really good performance from the West Indies women team although I was expected this kind of performance from the West Indies women team because If we just visit the head to head performance between the Ireland women team and the West Indies momentum then we will saw that the West Indies women team is much ahead from the Ireland women team. And as well we saw that kind of performance from the West Indies momentum especially their batting was outstanding in this match which was more than the expectation.
And I think that West Indies West Indies women team will also win the rest match in this series and as well there is a high chance to make white wash to the Ireland women team.

The way West Indies women team won the first ODI, it looks very obvious that they will easily win rest of the two ODIs matches. Ireland women team were all out in 49 overs after scoring 269 runs. Amy Hunter was highest runs scorer from Ireland side as she scored 96 runs while Afy Fletcher picked 4 wickets for West Indies side. West Indies got an opening of 258 runs and they lost the wicket of Realeanna Grimmond when they were just 12 runs away from winning the game. Hayley Matthews was player of the match for playing a knock of 159 runs.



12. Post 66928329 (unedited backup) (by virasog) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 22:12:07 CEST 2026) in FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread:

Quote from: |MINER| on Today at 07:38:36 PM
I was just going to post something like this: Spain is playing well enough against Belgium but they are not performing at the level that would allow them to win. But then I saw that Spain scored their first goal. Although the Belgian goalkeeper saved the first shot, he couldn't stop the second shot. So I will call it a magnificent goal.

I want to also say that the way they were performing there could also score more goal even we saw some counter attack from the Belgium team but that wouldn't gonna be workout in front of the strong defence of Spain.

The 2nd half is going to be very interesting. I know both teams will be defensive a bit in the 2nd half as soon as one teams scores, it will be all out attack by the other team.

Overall, Spain is dominating the match but the problem is that they aren't in lead. The lead that Spain took when Ruiz scored for them in the 31 minute, it looked that they will now play safe but soon after De Ketelaere scored an equalizer with an incredible header and it was something too good. Whether we will have a result in this half or will we go into extra time, we will get to know this in the next 45 minutes  Wink



13. Post 66927780 (unedited backup) (by welovebit) (scraped on Fri Jul 10 19:40:25 CEST 2026) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:

Quote from: HelliumZ on July 09, 2026, 10:18:39 PM
In the first inning I didn't expect that the Bangladesh team would not be able to cross that easy target and also in case of this match I was thought that maybe Bangladesh would win this match and as well also there were on that tract but in the main time there fall there wicket one by one so quickly
Like in the first match, in the second match, you will notice that the contribution of Bangladesh's top order batsmen was not as great as the failure of the lower order batsmen. This match was one of the main reasons for the defeat. But in the case of Zimbabwe, you can see that the good performance of Zimbabwe's lower order batsmen saved them from defeat in every match.Today,I thought that Bangladesh might be able to win, but unfortunately, Bangladesh lost today's match by 13 runs. This means that Bangladesh will be whitewashed in all three formats of the Zimbabwe tour, including Tests, ODIs and T20s.
After losing the first ODI, now their morale is down, and they are under pressure because in this second ODI they played better, but their selection of shots was not good their main batsmen failed to keep themselves on the crease. This was also their failure during the chase a few good chances came to them, but they failed and lost this match and series.
This could be big below for them because now things are getting worse with these defeats they have to accept their mistakes and learn from them; otherwise, they are going to be down and out in the last ODI of this series, which is going to be played tomorrow.
Zimbabwe is doing a good job at home even though they are also lacking good batting technique, but home conditions favor them, and they are taking good advantage of them.