Last update: 2025-11-22_Sat_22.36h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
|MINER| receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. |MINER|
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "|MINER|" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66082866 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Sat Nov 22 22:35:37 CET 2025) in Eternidade Stealer - targets Banking apps/Crypto Wallets/Exhanges:
Thanks I looked it up here too, and I got zero results for data leaks! Seems like I'm safe (for now)
It only shows up if your email is in one of their catalogued breaches. Sometimes they don’t have the full data set since hackers just trade them (or sell) between each other.
have I been pwned is also a great tool to check if any other data was leaked. On my phone right now, but look it up.
Used this site before and I can confirm all of my accounts are fine.
We live in a society, where every system is digitalised, and that's a reality we cannot escape. From birth to death, we are trapped in this loop of technology. One way or another, if not all many of us will eventually fall victim to these data leaks. Even countries with the strongest technology are failing to safeguard users data, so how can we expect a third world country to do any better? We are basically helpless, and we have already seen some examples of it. Things like our personal info, retinal scans, fingerprints are out there for sales in Telegram (not even darkweb but TG..)! Yes I am talking about NID (National Identification Document) leak!
Only one thing I can say, these info stealer poses serious risk, sometimes it's unavoidable but I hope we do not come to see that day.

2. Post 66081701 (unedited backup) (by Mahdirakib) (scraped on Sat Nov 22 18:18:07 CET 2025) in ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]:
But in this match, the West Indies team had a very bad batting performance; in other words, the New Zealand team won this match with zero competitive performance. Although it was an expected performance.
Yeah, West Indies batting performance was too bad in today's match. The target was low there. Still, New Zealand had lost 6 wickets to chase the target. The pitch condition was a bit difficult to bat. New Zealand was also under pressure after losing the first 3 wickets quickly. But the 5th wicket partnership between Mark Chapman and Michael Bracewell has made it easy for NZ. West is doing too bad on this tour.
3. Post 66080837 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Sat Nov 22 14:57:07 CET 2025) in Eternidade Stealer - targets Banking apps/Crypto Wallets/Exhanges:
So if I understand correctly, it steals data from your pc and being distributed through whatsapp? But one thing I don't get how the system gets infected. Surely it cannot be done automatically right? User has to execute the payload/script/the executable file? I checked the article but it was a massive one, and I couldn't find the things I wanted to know. In short, apart from those technical stuff, how this Stealer works? Can you explain it from a non technical perspective.
How reliable is this site? I'm not familiar with this platform. I just tried searching some of my oldest emails and number, and all of them came out as "safe for now". But if my memory serves me right, among the mails one of them was exposed in the past. And upon logging in, it would say my password was exposed or found in a data breach (something like that). So I'm confused a little. Anyway I'm happy none came as red.
4. Post 66078172 (unedited backup) (by ZAINmalik75) (scraped on Fri Nov 21 21:32:55 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
While in the semi-final I assumed that India A would win, Bangladesh A surprised me first with their batting performance of 194 runs, that too against a strong team like India A, it was extraordinary. Then again, even though they didn't do very well in terms of bowling, they played well in the Super Over, where luck was on their side as Bangladesh A team.
Bangladesh played out of the box performance, honestly everyone were sure about indopak final, but Bangladesh unexpected entry truly surprised them by demolishing one of strong contender for final, I think not just through bat but done phenomenal through ball which push indian to struggle while chased even having such big name. While on the other hand pakistani Shaheen done thier job and make it through the final by continuing thier win streak and most likely to beat Bangladesh A too but yeh things will not be that eats just like we expect from Pakistan. So Let's wait for 23 Nov to get the one and only try champion.
5. Post 66062940 (unedited backup) (by noormcs5) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 05:57:13 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
To be honest I didn't really expect that the Afghanistani A team will going to be all out in only 78 run. Because in reality, when we watch the International matches, the Afghanistan team is not in this condition, but the Bangladeshi team is in a bad condition.
From that perspective, I thought that the Afghanistan team would be able to beat the Bangladeshi team today, but they couldn't hold their own against the Bangladeshi team's bowlers.
Why couldn't anyone have predicted that Afghanistan would be all out for just 78 runs against Bangladesh? The way Afghanistan defeated Sri Lanka in their first match made it look like they would have a very tough competition against Bangladesh. But Bangladesh's Ripon Mondal's three consecutive hits at the start caused a complete batting disaster for Afghanistan. Then Afghanistan's Rasooli tried a bit but even then Afghanistan could not score more than 78 runs. As a result, Bangladesh scored 78 runs for the loss of just four wickets and defeated them by a big margin of eight wickets. Now Bangladesh is at the bottom of the points table with four points and is on the verge of becoming the group champion.
BAN-A won an easy game against the Afghanistan A team yesterday. Afghanistan A team could only manage 79 runs in their 20 overs. With these small runs, you can expect the bowlers to defend this low total.
They lost 5 wickets for 35 runs and it was the worst possible start. Captain Darwish Rasooli was the highest scorer in this innings with only 27 runs. This was their first loss in the Group A match While Bangladesh A sits right at top winning both the matches played so far.
6. Post 66062897 (unedited backup) (by Sithara007) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 05:23:32 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
To be honest I didn't really expect that the Afghanistani A team will going to be all out in only 78 run. Because in reality, when we watch the International matches, the Afghanistan team is not in this condition, but the Bangladeshi team is in a bad condition.
From that perspective, I thought that the Afghanistan team would be able to beat the Bangladeshi team today, but they couldn't hold their own against the Bangladeshi team's bowlers.
This actually hinsts about the lack of player pool in Afghanistan and availability of that in Bangladesh. 'A' series typically involve players who are usually kept in bench. During yesterday's match, captain Darwish Rasooli was the only Afghan player who could offer some resistance with the bat. Ripon Mondol, Rakibul Hasan and Meherob Hasan hardly found any difficulty in picking wickets. And during the chase, AM Ghazanfar with his leg breaks troubled the Bangladeshi batsmen are returned figures of 4-1-8-2.
7. Post 66062514 (unedited backup) (by Nothingtodo) (scraped on Tue Nov 18 00:54:13 CET 2025) in T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion:
To be honest I didn't really expect that the Afghanistani A team will going to be all out in only 78 run. Because in reality, when we watch the International matches, the Afghanistan team is not in this condition, but the Bangladeshi team is in a bad condition.
From that perspective, I thought that the Afghanistan team would be able to beat the Bangladeshi team today, but they couldn't hold their own against the Bangladeshi team's bowlers.
Why couldn't anyone have predicted that Afghanistan would be all out for just 78 runs against Bangladesh? The way Afghanistan defeated Sri Lanka in their first match made it look like they would have a very tough competition against Bangladesh. But Bangladesh's Ripon Mondal's three consecutive hits at the start caused a complete batting disaster for Afghanistan. Then Afghanistan's Rasooli tried a bit but even then Afghanistan could not score more than 78 runs. As a result, Bangladesh scored 78 runs for the loss of just four wickets and defeated them by a big margin of eight wickets. Now Bangladesh is at the bottom of the points table with four points and is on the verge of becoming the group champion.
8. Post 66061726 (unedited backup) (by Dickiy) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 20:43:49 CET 2025) in Do you bet against the public? let’s talk about it:
Obviously, the statistically stronger team certainly has a greater chance of winning. Above, I only spoke from a rational perspective, and using statistics as a reference for decision-making isn't always entirely accurate. This means that luck also plays a role. When a stronger team loses to a weaker team due to a small, inadvertent mistake on the field, it means they and those betting on them are unlucky.
But ultimately, the most important thing, in my opinion, is to bet responsibly, regardless of whether you follow the hype or analyze it yourself.
Yes, the last main point is that when we bet on a match, we use our brains and then bet. It is not that we bet on a team because most people are betting on it or that we will always lose because a team is behind in weak banking.
Because the result of a match is based on many factors and then comes the outcome. When a strong team has their main players out of the squad due to injury or any other reason, then it can be seen that even the strongest team has a chance of losing. So, considering everything, we should do our own analysis and then place bets.
Yes, the point is, anything can happen on the field, and this can lead to different outcomes, regardless of whether you support the stronger team or not. The tragedy of a player suffering an injury on the field can certainly have a negative impact on a team, which in most cases usually causes the team to lose its balance, especially if the player is a key player.
The point is, bet according to your own beliefs. If you know how to read statistics, use that skill to analyze. But it's also free. I mean, you're free to make your own predictions or follow the public's perspective, as long as you don't regret the results.
9. Post 66056971 (unedited backup) (by Dickiy) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 19:53:55 CET 2025) in Do you bet against the public? let’s talk about it:
Most people will naturally favor the team that's statistically favored, but one thing we must remember is that this isn't a guarantee of victory. This means betting based on hype, according to the public's bets, can be wrong. The reason is that I often see favored teams lose to weaker teams, even when they're playing at home.
The ball is round, and anything can happen on the field, and it doesn't always depend on statistics. Sometimes small mistakes on the field can have major consequences, such as defeat. Therefore, when I bet, I don't let the public's decisions influence me.
Actually I want to agree with you and at the same time I want to say that the majority public bets on the side of the team that they think is stronger in terms of strength and that is why the opposing team basically gets high odds. And in most cases it is seen that in such games the stronger team wins and the majority public wins the bet.
However, there are some exceptional matches where the underdog team wins, in which case it can be seen that maturity can also be achieved by betting against the people, but this is very relative, so I would say that I always consider it better to bet based on my own analysis.
Obviously, the statistically stronger team certainly has a greater chance of winning. Above, I only spoke from a rational perspective, and using statistics as a reference for decision-making isn't always entirely accurate. This means that luck also plays a role. When a stronger team loses to a weaker team due to a small, inadvertent mistake on the field, it means they and those betting on them are unlucky.
But ultimately, the most important thing, in my opinion, is to bet responsibly, regardless of whether you follow the hype or analyze it yourself.