Last update: 2026-02-09_Mon_15.36h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

Darker45 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Darker45
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "Darker45" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66389361 (unedited backup) (by julerz12) (scraped on Mon Feb 9 15:34:31 CET 2026) in [OPEN] Bet25.com ⚽ Smart Crypto Casino 🎰 Signature Campaign:

Just an update, I've received the additional funds for this campaign. All previously enrolled participants may retain their respective slots.
Kindly respond to this thread if you want to keep your slot.

WEEK 9 starts on 02/11.

Thank you.

Courtesy tag on previous participants:

odunybiz
rezakurnia66
shawonngp
JoyMarsha
DiMarxist
barbara44
nimogsm
CryptoYar
Darker45
SquallLeonhart



2. Post 66385279 (unedited backup) (by ColdLava40) (scraped on Sun Feb 8 12:06:44 CET 2026) in Bitcoin is going to ZERO:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 03:18:33 AM
what makes you think doctored emails would bring it down today?

More critics looking for ways to make bitcoin look stupid in the eyes of many. They just don't give up and bitcoin won't do same.

Since the release of this Epstein file,many rumours have been flying around. But I guess this is yet another false claim, to the government and opportunity to exploit bitcoin.

They failed and will continue to. They couldn't stop bitcoin in the early days of it's creation. Though they criticised it, but failed at several attempts. They still won't be able to do it now. Even if these fake rumors suddenly seems to impact price negatively, bitcoin will still stand strong. It will just take a little bitty time..



3. Post 66370283 (unedited backup) (by dwyane36) (scraped on Wed Feb 4 13:28:13 CET 2026) in BTC Sentiment Poll for February :

Quote from: Ayers on Today at 09:27:27 AM
Bitcoin had not only 4 red monthly candles in a row before, it had more. There were even 5 consecutive red months in the past, so if this month ends in red, it wouldn't be the first time. As a matter of fact, there were even 6 successive months of red. So, even if March closes in red too, we shouldn't be surprised, either.

If I remember correctly, Bitcoin once had a streak of 7 consecutive green candles during the bull market in 2025. Therefore, we should not be surprised if it has 7 consecutive red candles in a bear market

If we're talking about a monthly timeframe, then no, there weren't seven green candles in a row in 2025. The last time something like this happened on the market was at the end of 2023 and the beginning of 2024.
Overall, yes, there is a possibility that the current bearish trend could have the same number of red candles in a row. In this case, we should expect the bearish trend to end no earlier than April and the BTC price to fall below $60k. To be honest, it would be nice not to see such a scenario.



4. Post 66369737 (unedited backup) (by Ayers) (scraped on Wed Feb 4 10:27:31 CET 2026) in BTC Sentiment Poll for February :

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 06:49:31 AM
Bitcoin had not only 4 red monthly candles in a row before, it had more. There were even 5 consecutive red months in the past, so if this month ends in red, it wouldn't be the first time. As a matter of fact, there were even 6 successive months of red. So, even if March closes in red too, we shouldn't be surprised, either.

If I remember correctly, Bitcoin once had a streak of 7 consecutive green candles during the bull market in 2025. Therefore, we should not be surprised if it has 7 consecutive red candles in a bear market


Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 06:49:31 AM
I'm looking at a red February. We're still less than 40% down from the ATH. There's still a lot of room below. But I'd say let it come! Let everybody enjoy the sale season!

There was a time when bitcoin fell below $73k and if the ATH is $126k, bitcoin has fallen by about 40%. However, I agree that the bear market has only just begun and there is still plenty of room for decline.  And this is clearly an opportunity we should seize because it only happens once every 4 year. So instead of panicking, take advantage of this rare opportunity.



5. Post 66365728 (unedited backup) (by m2017) (scraped on Tue Feb 3 08:45:49 CET 2026) in The most legit 21st century robbery:

Quote from: Darker45 on January 31, 2026, 02:41:24 AM
That's what governments always do. "Hey, that's wrong! Give it to me." And then it's theirs. "Hey, that's dirty money! I've got to seize it!" And then they're keeping it. If it's money they label dirty, it shouldn't be in the hands of anybody else but theirs.
And you're waiting for governments to start buying bitcoin. You're making me laugh. As I've said many times before, they don't need to buy it, because they'll take it by force and for free. At first, the hunt is for the "big fish", but later, the "small fish" will get their turn. So, talk more about your bitcoin holdings and show who you are with your KYCs on centralized exchanges. Smiley

Quote from: Darker45 on January 31, 2026, 02:41:24 AM
They can do whatever they want with dirty Bitcoin. They can use it as a reserve asset. They can even auction it off back to the public. Doesn't it reek with double standard?
That's right.

Quote from: Darker45 on January 31, 2026, 02:41:24 AM
If somebody who's not a criminal or involved in any illegal transaction is keeping what's labeled as dirty coins, the coins will be confiscated. But the owner could have them back if he's buying it from the very government that seized them for being dirty. Isn't that a joke?
No, it's not funny. Those are the rules of the game. Get used to it. The "strongest" one dictates the rules and ensures they are followed.


Quote from: Darker45 on January 31, 2026, 02:41:24 AM
Tell me how this is not a robbing method in a robinhood outfits by these governments.
This is just robbery, but there is nothing "noble" about it like Robin Hood - the "sheriff" will take all the money taken from Robin Hood.

How about this: one guy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Zhong) withdrew bitcoins (over 50,000) from "silk road" (the so-called villains) using the "magic" of 2nd click, after which the government confiscated his bitcoins?

By law, these bitcoins should have been returned to their owners, right? Smiley



6. Post 66362952 (unedited backup) (by Oshosondy) (scraped on Mon Feb 2 15:17:49 CET 2026) in Does anyone here actually use self-exclusion in casinos?:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 02:03:19 PM
I don't think the feature is entirely useless. To somebody who is aware of his worsening situation, he/she could take advantage of it to divert his/her focus on something else.
I was addicted to gambling before, I know all the stages. I will let you know that the feature can not help, who is going to later become addicted to gambling will later become addicted to gambling. The person can go for self-exclusion but he will be the one that will make use of another gambling site. This will only make him use more gambling sites instead.