Last update: 2025-11-14_Fri_07.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Darker45 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Darker45
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Darker45" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66046275 (unedited backup) (by MarjorieZimmermanGinger) (scraped on Fri Nov 14 07:05:44 CET 2025) in Flawless Bitcoin payment experience :
Make no mistake, I have nothing against the pizza guy. He's a legend, an OG. He's brilliant. He contributed so much both in Bitcoin's early technical development and Bitcoin's practical adoption as a real-world money. I'm a big fan. I didn't mention him to make an insult. I don't agree that he didn't believe in Bitcoin. To a certain extent, we should thank him for our "flawless Bitcoin payment" experiences today. He started the ball rolling.
If he didn't believe in Bitcoin, he probably wouldn't accept Bitcoin payments, or he might have felt sorry for the person who bought the pizza with Bitcoin because he didn't have cash. Beyond that, we'll never know how it all turned out, because logically, people accept payments using anything other than trust, probably because they feel sorry for the person. This story has become legendary, and even among those familiar with Bitcoin, almost everyone has heard it. Perhaps we should thank him for being the first person to embrace a direct Bitcoin trading system as at that time, Bitcoin was worthless and he was the only crazy person willing to accept Bitcoin payments.
2. Post 66046003 (unedited backup) (by Oshio-man) (scraped on Fri Nov 14 04:22:55 CET 2025) in What should you know before recommending Bitcoin to a friend?:
We may discuss about Bitcoin with friends, relatives, workmates, and others if we must. We may provide them a long list of dos and don'ts, very basic things, reminders to always keep in mind should they decide to go into Bitcoin, but I guess we should never exhort them to buy.
Basic thing like not your key not your coin, some of them need to know the best wallet to use to hold their coin for long term, using exchange wallet to hold for your coins for long term is not safe for newbies because the owner of the exchange have right to have access to your coins if anything happen that will make the team to withdraw your coins from the exchange, Some of the users that survived here apple patience to become who they are today, which I know newbies can also do the same thing to over any challenge that may come their way, for your to recommend anyone to bitcoin make sure you have seen good results or you have benefited from bitcoin because some people need to see evidence from you before they will believe that you have the knowledge of bitcoin.
3. Post 66045525 (unedited backup) (by Sandra_hakeem) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 23:57:56 CET 2025) in If you just want to have fun, bet small and go for parlays.:
I agree. If it's only excitement and fun that you're after, why not go for small bets on parlay? Difficult to win, but high rewards.
I used to be following a local casting channel. They eventually promoted a betting site. I remember majority of the bets they publicly shared were parlays. It seems they're having fun. They're betting small amounts. No big deal if lost. I can't even remember they celebrated for a win. They must have lost most of the time. But they seem happy. They're already enjoying at almost making it.
Some petty things like this can be of great excitement to the better part of every man that roams this earth.. How that really works for them, IDK.. but I'm curious about who has ever been so Lucky to pull the jackpot after several dozens of tries? You're right, the parlays are just suitable for them since they don't even care how much they lose at the end. For some, fun isn't trying to minimize your wager limit to go many more times (which would increase the possibility of an outcome).. They don't care about what you think-- Just a single game on a ticket, with say $800. So they don't have to wait for too many outcomes since they're only expecting one of all.
4. Post 66043493 (unedited backup) (by DubemIfedigbo001) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 15:31:02 CET 2025) in How do evaluate that you're still gambling responsibly?:
Do you think it's right to reference to others as a yardstick to evaluate your level of responsible gambling?
How do you measure yours?
If You ask me I will say no, because sometimes people feel so pumpus and arugant about how they feel about themselves, they even go as far as referring to others as a yardstick. But however they don't even consider themselves and the people they reffearing to. I have actualy met or seen this kind of people and trust me, they are almost everywhere lolz.
He doesn't want to take responsibility of his actions, it's normal for people to find an escape route from accepting the truth about themselves, maybe he was afraid of losing face so I would not start seeing him as irresponsible since I'm his superior even though I cleared him that it was not my intent, but he remained adamant and I had to let him be.
I admit I sometimes gamble more than I should, but I'm aware that it's beyond moderation. I always go back to gambling what I can afford to lose.
This is the point that my junior is refusing to admit, that he is being excessive and in denial so he is not prepared to take an inventory of himself and his financial life to see reasons to cut down on his gambling, maybe a bad financial condition is the only situation would force someone like him to be more diligent in handling his cashflow, that is if he would be willing to learn from his mistakes and not find yet another thing to blame.
5. Post 66043158 (unedited backup) (by Outhue) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 14:01:49 CET 2025) in Flawless Bitcoin payment experience :
I haven't bought anything from Newegg. But it seems it's not a Black Friday thing. I doubt they won't offer Black Friday discounts to fiat payments, which is certainly how most of their stuff are bought. It must be Newegg's way of incentivizing Bitcoin payments, so props to them for going the extra mile in pushing for Bitcoin adoption!
OP, I have an idea. Print the Transaction image and put it some where like in a drawer you only check every few years or a time capsule. It will be a very interesting thing to find in a matter of years after you forget about it.
It would be OP's personal version of Laszlo's pizza. 10 years from now, he/she'll remember he/she once bought a $100,000 PC. But that's not going to be a big deal. All of us will have or already have our fair share of similar experience. That's going to be the story of a currency that gains value over time rather than loses it.
It is not a $100,000 PC, I guess that's a typo error, in 10years to this time I would have more than the Bitcoin I spent right now, I still run few Bitcoin miners in my home and I also accept Bitcoin as means of payment still even while I am not been patronised all the time that a customer would want to pay me with Bitcoin, all my life is now about Bitcoin, no regrets using Bitcoin to buy a PC that I have so much wanted.
If I am still alive in 10 years to this time I bet I would have a lot more Bitcoin, it is only those who fail to plan that such thing would happen to, if the Pizza guy spent 10,000 BTC for pizza he choose to let go totally, if not why wouldn't he buy the 10,000 Bitcoin back after a month or two? What happened to pizza guy happened because he doesn't believe in Bitcoin, not because he spent the Bitcoin, while you are spending you should be gathering back up again.
Let me explain this to you, I sold this Bitcoin for a PC at @100k, I can accumulate aggressively at @50k BTC. I am not Pizza Guy.
6. Post 66042226 (unedited backup) (by john_egbert) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 09:13:37 CET 2025) in Flawless Bitcoin payment experience :
It would be OP's personal version of Laszlo's pizza. 10 years from now, he/she'll remember he/she once bought a $100,000 PC. But that's not going to be a big deal. All of us will have or already have our fair share of similar experience. That's going to be the story of a currency that gains value over time rather than loses it.
I agree.
We can do as many "capsules" like that as we want, but we would still want to use BTC as an alternative to using fiat, and this kind of perception cannot and shouldn't stop us from doing so.
7. Post 66041618 (unedited backup) (by PrivacyG) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 04:58:02 CET 2025) in Flawless Bitcoin payment experience :
It would be OP's personal version of Laszlo's pizza. 10 years from now, he/she'll remember he/she once bought a $100,000 PC. But that's not going to be a big deal. All of us will have or already have our fair share of similar experience. That's going to be the story of a currency that gains value over time rather than loses it.
10 MILLION Dollars per Bitcoin would be simply crazy. While I would be happy about the price, it would say something very very bad about the Economy.
8. Post 66041391 (unedited backup) (by Marvell1) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 02:44:08 CET 2025) in Flawless Bitcoin payment experience :
OP, I have an idea. Print the Transaction image and put it some where like in a drawer you only check every few years or a time capsule. It will be a very interesting thing to find in a matter of years after you forget about it.
It would be OP's personal version of Laszlo's pizza. 10 years from now, he/she'll remember he/she once bought a $100,000 PC. But that's not going to be a big deal. All of us will have or already have our fair share of similar experience. That's going to be the story of a currency that gains value over time rather than loses it.
Fiat money loses value over time, while investment assets like gold, bitcoin or even stocks appreciate over time. So not only with bitcoin, if we sell gold, stocks to buy PC or pizza. 10 years later we’ll probably look back and feel the same kind of regret.
But that’s life, sometimes selling is necessary because the purpose of investing is to improve and serve life, not to hold on forever until death, while our current life is full of difficulties. Exchanging future value for present needs is a normal thing.
9. Post 66040590 (unedited backup) (by DrBeer) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 21:42:13 CET 2025) in Cryptocurrencies in the hands of rogue countries—risks for cryptocurrencies? :
I think countries will keep a close eye on transactions to try to collect taxes from citizens and have greater control over money, because money is a way of enslaving people. But deep down, I think those who hold Bitcoin do not care much about that, transactions will continue to happen whether the state likes it or not.
Of course. That's expected, especially now that crypto is already starting to become a mainstream technology. The price to pay for adoption is regulation. Regulation is associated with control. Although Bitcoin itself can't be controlled by the government, it's use, conversion, access, and whatnot could easily be made inconvenient by the government.
This is the reason why sometimes it's confusing which should be preferred: adoption, getting into the mainstream, or remaining as an underground currency.
Meanwhile,
the socialist republic of brazil has launched three bizarre, poorly drafted resolutions that will practically kill national exchanges, as they will no longer be viable to use.
One example of the absurd regulations they want to impose on their citizens is reporting all withdrawals from self-custody wallets, requiring the user to identify the destination address (similar to AOPP).
With this, the brazilian government wants to keep all data centralized in its hands: name, identity, transactions, and other data. All it takes is for this data to leak and end up in the hands of criminals.
The pretext is the same as always: to combat money laundering and terrorism, but the real intention is to have absolute control and collect increasingly more taxes.
But how will they ensure compliance with these rules? Given that the user can report true data and then easily clear the KYC using privacy services?
The funny thing is that there's no way they can guarantee the law will be enforced, because naturally people will opt for more privacy; after all, that's what we use Bitcoin for.
I will not condemn Brazilian laws; I have not studied their decisions in depth, but I know one thing. The paradox of our lives is that in trying to make our world better and safer, we have to take a lot of steps that look very bad and create a lot of inconvenience, including restrictions on freedoms. At the same time, criminals continue to “improve their skills,” innocent citizens continue to suffer, and governments continue to “tighten the screws” for the greater good, but in reality, the situation only gets worse. I see the reason for this in the fact that criminals never play by the rules or laws, while innocent citizens are often very law-abiding.
10. Post 66039471 (unedited backup) (by vanhalendlrband) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 16:40:02 CET 2025) in Anyone ever able to withdraw from Ascendex?:
they rejected my withdraw this morning after 3 days may have been a timeout tho
Which means the funds are once again in your wallet? Or are they held hostage?
If the funds are already in your account and you want to withdraw them, you might consider withdrawing them in varying small amounts and not with fixed intervals. Don't attract unnecessary attention or set off certain triggers. You mentioned it's a large amount of withdrawal. Surely, you don't want to undergo another manual review for your transaction. Don't even make the impression that you're leaving Ascendex for good. They seem a shady exchange.
Also, are you withdrawing in ZEC? If yes, is it possible you can withdraw in BTC or stablecoins? I'm not sure how friendly regulators in your country are but ZCash is widely treated as a privacy coin. And it has been highly scrutinized, even delisted in some areas. It's better to err on the side of caution.
yeah all back in my wallet rejected 3 times. I am now trying a smaller amount but thats also under review. They say they review every new address so doesnt matter how large it seems. They take high withdraw fees so multiple transactions will cost a lot of money too if they even let me take out anything at all
11. Post 66037639 (unedited backup) (by OcTradism) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 04:52:49 CET 2025) in Strategy and psychology :
When it comes to Bitcoin investment, I guess most diamond hands are made, not born. I have a bit of experience, and I'd say the more you're exposed to the market, the more you become more or less indifferent to the short-term ups and downs. It's natural to feel strong emotions whenever there's a big movement on the charts when you're a newbie. But you'll get to a point when everything becomes familiar. You've seen it all.
However, as always, invest according to your risk appetite. If you're losing too much sleep, then perhaps you've invested more than you can afford to lose. But if your investment is minimal yet you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Perhaps Bitcoin isn't for you. Bitcoin is volatile, and it will remain so for the next several years.
Nobody was born as Bitcoin investor or even investor in other markets.
To become investors, people must learn about investment, the market, the possible assets they are considering for investment portfolio. Then they must have finance and use their discretionary income for investment portfolio, it's all time- and money-consuming.
Even people have good finance, have discretionary income for investment, the pathway with investment is long, requires a lot of time for gainig personal experience, to become a master in this market.
Fortunately, if people have good preparation from knowledge to finance, and have strong hands for holding bitcoins they bought, they can get profit even they just started as newbie investors. With time, they get more experience, and together with profit and success they have, they will understand this market more, become master investors without spending expensive cost for learning and practicing for loss. So investment is risky, but if you begin well, you can have good profit like senior investors.
12. Post 66036566 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 20:34:55 CET 2025) in Cryptocurrencies in the hands of rogue countries—risks for cryptocurrencies? :
I think countries will keep a close eye on transactions to try to collect taxes from citizens and have greater control over money, because money is a way of enslaving people. But deep down, I think those who hold Bitcoin do not care much about that, transactions will continue to happen whether the state likes it or not.
Of course. That's expected, especially now that crypto is already starting to become a mainstream technology. The price to pay for adoption is regulation. Regulation is associated with control. Although Bitcoin itself can't be controlled by the government, it's use, conversion, access, and whatnot could easily be made inconvenient by the government.
This is the reason why sometimes it's confusing which should be preferred: adoption, getting into the mainstream, or remaining as an underground currency.
Meanwhile,
the socialist republic of brazil has launched three bizarre, poorly drafted resolutions that will practically kill national exchanges, as they will no longer be viable to use.
One example of the absurd regulations they want to impose on their citizens is reporting all withdrawals from self-custody wallets, requiring the user to identify the destination address (similar to AOPP).
With this, the brazilian government wants to keep all data centralized in its hands: name, identity, transactions, and other data. All it takes is for this data to leak and end up in the hands of criminals.
The pretext is the same as always: to combat money laundering and terrorism, but the real intention is to have absolute control and collect increasingly more taxes.
But how will they ensure compliance with these rules? Given that the user can report true data and then easily clear the KYC using privacy services?
The funny thing is that there's no way they can guarantee the law will be enforced, because naturally people will opt for more privacy; after all, that's what we use Bitcoin for.
13. Post 66034017 (unedited backup) (by vanhalendlrband) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 07:13:25 CET 2025) in Anyone ever able to withdraw from Ascendex?:
yeah see what happens about 12 and a half hours to go
I don't think it's wise to be too literal when it comes to the timelines provided by exchanges' support. When they mention 48 to 72 hours, it could actually easily go 96, 120 hours, even weeks and months. There's actually no point trusting the words of exchanges. If even their guarantee of users' safety of funds they can't keep, what more about hourly timelines? I hope I'll be proven wrong within hours.
Anyway, I also doubt Ascendex is registered in Canada. I doubt they're regulated under FINTRAC or CSA, or at least I couldn't find their name in the official sites.
I know its on their list of allowed countries on Ascendex and i had verified with my Canadian ID selecting Canada from their drop down menu and passed the verification fine.
How long do you think i should wait and are there any other steps to take?
14. Post 66033421 (unedited backup) (by slapper) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 00:27:49 CET 2025) in Concentrate on Financial education rather than Wealth.:
While I won't say books and workshops and seminars are entirely worthless, I'd say anybody who truly desires to be financially responsible doesn't have to have all those things. For me, it's all a matter of common sense, character, values, responsibility.
Living life beyond your means isn't a matter of ignorance. It's a matter of discipline. Moreover, you don't have to attend a seminar to learn how to save. You only have to have the right mindset. If you always buy the latest iPhone at its first release but you're buried in debt, that's not because you missed reading a book. That's because you missed developing in yourself a sense of responsibility.
I disagree that "Bitcoin is one good way through which an individual can liberate their self from from poverty". You always have to go back to step one. Otherwise, you'll sell it after a little profit to book a ticket and a hotel for a nice vacation.
Systemic malfunction cannot be corrected by individual discipline. I have seen people spend their money like it was their last, go without meals to afford them, work to death, and still be worse off since rent went up 40 percent and their pay went up 3 percent.
The "right mindset" framing bothers me because it places all the weight on personal responsibility and ignores the fact that responsibility requires agency. When you are facing a decision between bad and worse, then that is constrained optimization. A buyer who purchases an iphone in debt may be making the only decision that does not seem like utter failure. We are social animals; our obvious poverty has actual expenses in terms of employment, relationships, psyche.
What strikes me about your Bitcoin point, is you've identified that financial windfalls fail without foundation, but then blamed the person, rather than ask why they lack foundation. When one has been in survival mode over years, his/her relationship with money is distorted. The research on poverty is obvious: the scarcity alters the decision because it must. It is impossible to think long-term when short-term is always burning. Character develops under conditions that allow its development.
15. Post 66029806 (unedited backup) (by Alpen) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 08:37:25 CET 2025) in Crypto Payments Made Easy with Cryptomus: One Platform to Stake, Trade, and Stay:
Isn't it unfair for anybody who's done everything right to have his/her wallet blacklisted because the current mechanism or tools can't exactly tell whether a user is a good or bad actor? Isn't it shameful for a platform like yours not to allow a transaction to proceed because the report shows high risk despite the user not doing anything wrong?
Cryptomus operates as a crypto payment gateway, which means the company is required to strictly follow KYC/AML procedures in line with the obligations set by its regulatory licenses.
At the same time, any user whose transaction or wallet has been flagged or temporarily blocked has the right to appeal this decision in accordance with applicable laws and regulatory procedures.
16. Post 66022867 (unedited backup) (by The Cryptovator) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 14:37:02 CET 2025) in How Bitcoin can create true financial freedom for countries with bank.:
Another thing is that access to Bitcoin mostly requires a bank account or at least an online banking account. Having money doesn't automatically mean you can save them in Bitcoin. Even in urban areas, it isn't that easy to convert your cold cash into Bitcoin. Most of the time, you'd have to go through traditional financial channels.
No, I won't agree with you regarding having a bank account to acquire Bitcoin. You just need a strong intention to acquire Bitcoin. I have a couple of friends; I give them Bitcoin and crypto. They pay me in cash, though I am not a reseller, but I can't manage it for them. They really don't make bank transactions or any other MFS services; that's called mobile banking. In my country even people in rural areas have mobile banking, so even if they want to buy Bitcoin, they don't need a bank account.
Based on the topic, rural area people even struggle to have bank accounts, so using Bitcoin would be quite hard for them. As I said above, having Bitcoin doesn't mean you should have a bank account, but the question is about how smart the people are there. Definitely only smart people could use Bitcoin who have a proper knowledge about internet and Bitcoin. Bitcoin won't fill the lack of a banking system. Because Bitcoin isn't legal tender there, and you can't purchase goods for daily needs with Bitcoin. So everything depends on the circumstances.
17. Post 66017790 (unedited backup) (by Hashura) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 08:38:49 CET 2025) in Need help for wallet:
I saw the recommended wallets and decided to go with Electrum. When I made a new wallet, there are so many addresses. Which one should I use to transfer bitcoin?
You have to understand about wallet and address.
A wallet is like your house.
Your addresses are like rooms inside your house.
Imagine your Bitcoin transaction sent to your wallet is like a letter sent to your house. It can come to any room of your house but it still belongs to you. The same with bitcoins sent to any addresses in your wallet, these coins belong to you.
Some recommendations to use Electrum wallet safely.
[GUIDE] How to Safely Download and Verify Electrum.The paranoid user's security guide for using Electrum safely.I like your analogy. Thanks man, this made it easier for me to understand. I just learned how to quote and I edited my previous post to reply to Darker45.
18. Post 66017173 (unedited backup) (by bisdak40) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 02:20:20 CET 2025) in [Boxing] Donaire vs Tsutsumi for WBA Bantamweight Title Dec. 17:
Donaire has high ring IQ. He's an intelligent boxer, one who can take advantage of aggressive pressures. He can counter very well. And his counter punches aren't without power. The big problem now is the execution. At his age, speed, reflexes, quick movements, ability to sustain them for many rounds must have already waned significantly.
If the younger Japanese fighter maintains the level of pressure all throughout the fight and Donaire won't be able to land a hook that makes the opponent respect him, it'll be hard for Donaire to survive. Donaire isn't a boxer who makes the most of clinching. He often maintains a certain distance. Perhaps he should try learning that art because he's already an old veteran fighting against a young and hungry opponent.
Good observation—Donaire isn't the clinching type and might opt to slug it out early, much like he did in his rematch with Inoue. I just hope he can land some of those lethal left hooks to keep Tsutsumi at bay. Otherwise, he could be in serious trouble against Tsutsumi's relentless pressure. Donaire showed clear signs of decline in his bout with Campos; had that fight gone the full twelve rounds, the outcome might have swung the other way. For this match, he needs to make an impact early—or better yet, score a knockout—because if it drags on, things could get rough for him.