True, but neither are funds stored in centralized exchanges insured. The exchange can make a mistake that would cost their customers and they end up getting nothing. If people actually want their funds insured up to a certain amount, then they should keep them in fiat and store it in the bank. To be honest, i would rather leave my funds in fiat and keep it in the bank, than buy crypto and store it in an exchange.

The elderly have more health problems like dementia that are parts of reasons they dislike new technologies and innovative things like Bitcoin and blockchain. They will have to figure out which things are best and safest for their finance, with their lifespan counts down to the end, and along the way there will be more effects from ageing. There are third party companies and services that can help the elderly but if possible, they still have to consider about non custodial wallets to use and store funds by themselves. In addition, inheritance plan is another thing they must consider when they are old enough.

Self-custody is very important for everyone, at any age if they can take care of it by themselves. This fund storage method is not limited to people who have big fund, large amount of bitcoin, but also is helpful for people with small funds. People who are not rich can see small funds as their real fortunes and surely they are not ready to lose their fortunes.

There's so much sense in your input, because it's not about information or following the whales, it is more about how much you have to lose and still remain buoyant, because whether we like to agree or not, smart money investors also make loss but they don't get affected financially because they have money in surplus.
Big players have massive cash reserves, and can survive the harsh reality if the market longer than a retail investor who is barely afloat ever could.

Bitcoin has very good ROIs in past years and previous market cycles, while in the future Bitcoin has very good potential of having better ROIs than traditional assets.

Let's emphasize that better ROI is not the only reason to make Bitcoin more attractive than other assets. With Bitcoin, people can completely control their fund, their wealth and no longer have to feel uncertain and fearful about freeze or seizure of their funds by any central banks, commercial banks or companies.

It's simply as "It's their Bitcoin private key, it's their bitcoin."

People can lose their bitcoins with physical damages, water, fire, acid, erosion, earthquake and others which are all possible with wars. If people have bitcoin, they must store their coins in non custodial wallets, and do proper wallet storage and back up storage.

How to back up a seed phrase?
How to burry a Bitcoin seed phrase backup?
How to lose all your bitcoin investments.
Thoughts on secure storage of bitcoins and other crypto assets.

Yeah the juice is just the cost of using sportsbooks so it makes sense to focus on picking the right side.
They want to make money too, but for most of bettors, this small thing is not relevant anymore, especially if big guys, they don't mind it anymore or maybe they won't even notice it.

Still shopping different books for better odds can chip away at that missing 0.10 and it adds up long term.

Yes that sounds very viable. The US treasury kickstarting Whales into buying Bitcoin, or at
least kickstarting like minded people into taking action to counter the Treasury's next FIAT
debasement move.

I guess a lot of Whales might have been expecting a market drop below $60k?

Its interesting that traders would liquidate their short trades to just stack Bitcoin instead,
I guess its the ones who acted fast are the ones not getting liquidated by force.

I think OP was specifically searching for ways to gamble and not giving his personal information to the casino in the process, that is pretty much it, he found a casino which he thought he would not need to give any documents to, but from the very beginning he was asked to give his real name and phone number, so instead of getting away from that casino, he went and provided false information, in order to access it services.

Honestly, if I was him I would stop gambling there, withdraw whatever the has left on that account and move to a different casino which is not that shady.  Or at least some which is actually free from KYC if that is so important to him.

This is a brilliant idea, the transaction can also take place in an ATM stand nearby to or in a banking hall, though buyers who would claim not to store cash in the bank won't follow this routine or idea, and not everybody who refuse to withdraw directly from the bank are malicious, it's just a way to bypass the problem of fake notes, but the seller would have limitations from buyers who wouldn't abide to this method of transaction.

Bitcoin has been treated as a scarce and valuable asset by many reasons, not only because it has a fixed and limited total supply capped at 21 millions. Some important components that combine together and make high value for Bitcoin are: Proof of Work, Decentralization, No-Censorship, The strongest and most secure blockchain.

There are altcoins with same or lower total supplies than Bitcoin has but their coin values are lower or $0. There are many altcoins with names like Bitcoin forks, with Proof of Work too, with 21M total supplies but they are either dead or very weak on the market in both trading volumes and prices.

This is what I've been saying. It's not like the US debt just jumped from $20 trillion to $40 trillion in 2 days. I can remember even reading on this forum when the debt was $38 trillion, so if something has reached 38 trillion, how shocked will people be if it gets to 40 trillion? So shocked that they lose all confidence in the USD and start looking for Bitcoin as an alternative? 
If people are to lose confidence in the dollar, the US debt is not something people will use to lose confidence. The debt has been high for as long as I can remember. If anything, we should be discussing how quickly the debt rose from $30 trillion to $40 trillion in 5 years, instead of talking about confidence in the USD.


And I believe it will drop soon. I just hope it doesn't fall below $70k when it does. We've seen this pattern with Bitcoin a lot of times. When the price rises too quickly, it falls even faster. When the price lingers at 77k-78k for a while, short term investors will start taking profit.

Thank you for the suggestions; let me clarify a few points: I am not trying to make it appear as though this isn't mine—after all, I couldn't do that... My username matches the platform's name, and as I mentioned, I am testing this to offer a service that meets users' interests. Additional information about each asset, as well as the price, can be accessed with a simple click on the box. The ranking is currently in ascending order, and I don't believe it needs to be changed. If you have any other observations, I would be happy for you to share them so that the platform can grow.

This deserves more than being scrolled past.


The $40 trillion figure wasn't news to anyone watching, as it was reported by pooya87. Treasury releases the balance every day, to the penny, at https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/debt-to-the-penny/ and any interested he could have seen which week it would break the months barrier there. Markets do not reprice on scheduled arithmetic they have got surprise inflation.
If four assets have four different holders and four different stories and they're all moving on the same days, it's a dollar liquidity move, it is not four separate moves to safety that just so happened to occur on the same days.
There is a method to identify which one it is, and it doesn't require a chart of debts. If people start liquidating treasuries then the yields on longterm instruments will rise, as debt panic sets in. The buyback liquidity that @Darker45 mentioned it is just the opposite. Where was the 30 year these 3 days?

You're right, I typed that wrong, what I mean is his been dropped or knocked down a lot of times. Note that even on the knockdown still able to win it.

So it already shows that he can get dropped but could recover and continue fighting, so for sure it will be a good fight. I mean, Joshua's style was just too straightforward for me, it was just textbook combinations but still effective. Fury has the range if Joshua doesn't do anything about that, he might get punished by Fury's Jab. Joshua needs more of a close fight to actually get to punch Fury with power.

I like to think of this Russia's approval of crypto as a workaround to the SWIFT ban which resulted in difficulty doing international business and actually that makes sense.

Despite the risk of blacklisting, USDT have the most liquidity and usage for international remittance, which also rule out the reason why they don't really use rubble-pegged stablecoin because it barely has any liquidity and not really used for international trades.

USDT also have large chunk of liquidity and volume in Tron blockchain which founder also operates HTX, the ones recently sanctioned by the EU as well. I guess easier remittance and P2P for them since that is the case.

Since they both lost to Oleksandr Usyk twice, I'm not sure how the odds are calculated either, but from what I understand, sports odds used by bookmakers are based on where fans put their money to make sure the sportsbook has a chance of making a profit; that's why the odds change sometimes. They also assess physical characteristics, previous defeats, defensive prowess, and recent performance.

I am also very much surprised that Joshua is an underdog. If I look on Fury and Joshua latest opponents, then for me Joshua fought (does not matter won or lost) stronger guys. Just ignore Jake Paul in his record. Joshua KOed, won or lost to boxers in prime or in their perfect age for boxing. Fury wasnt as active as Joshua, went full distance with average Makhmudov, it took him 7 rounds to finish beaten veteran Wach. Fury isnt mentally stable with his retirements and returns. And he is a favorite? I look like AJ is going to be first to knockout Fury

This is good question, Tether definitely have history of blacklisting Russia linked sanctioned exchange like Garantex at the amount of $25 millions or so, but they approved USDT.

But, since Tether doesn't seem to want to operate within EU and comply to the MiCA and already got removed from EU accordingly. They might think, any EU sanction won't result in USDT blacklisting.

For context, the Garantex wallet freezing was requested by the U.S. Secret Service (USSS).

I think they've taken into account that unless the sanction is coming from the U.S., they could still use USDT as a workaround.

I anticipate that Joshua will be viewed as the underdog in this matchup because of his earlier performance against Usyk, among other factors. However, I see him emerging victorious in this upcoming fight against Tyson Fury following his emotional win over Kristian Prenga in Riyadh; I’m convinced he’ll be a formidable force in the ring the next time he faces another opponent.

Yeah it does, Joshua is considered the underdog in this fight and i am a bit surprised by that. In the bookie i use, right now a win for Joshua is at 2.46 odds, while a Tyson Fury victory is at 1.44 odds. Honestly, i expected the odds to be much more closer than this. Though there would still be changes in the odds from now up until the fight happens, but clearly more people are backing Fury to come out on top in this fight, maybe i need to rethink my pick, lol.

Once of common reason on why there are people choose to use those manageable wallets and try to use strong passphrase.

Those wallet could actually handle those complex actions, but somehow the true cost of this is there are several people can't handle the changes and also the stress that might get.

So somehow a great lesson to get from them. Also best set up is the one they mentioned. but they should consider to use those things which they can able to operate then handle consistently, since its not good to look only cool in papers.

The first thing i will teach a beginner about bitcoin is how be a good patient investor, and not to see bitcoin as a way of making quick money. This is the the best thing we can teach the new investors, because most of them all think about how to get rich when they invest in bitcoin. If they put all their mind into getting rich quickly in bitcoin, it will lead them to be an impatient investors who can not hold bitcoin for a long time, and for a person to become a successful investor you have to be able to hold for long term.

Although the first that step every beginner should know is how to buy bitcoin and store it, before teaching any beginner how to buy bitcoin, i will first give them good advice to see if they are ready, there are some people who only want to start investing just to make a profit, so it would be a good idea to explain to them before they start blaming you after they have invested.

No, you aree wrong.

Make sure you do not do the arbitrage betting on the same gambling site and you are very fine. I have been betting since 2014 and I was an addict before.

I do not just post theory about this.

It was later I did not gamble as I was gambling before.

I have tried different strategies before including arbitrage betting.

The gambling sites are also making sure their owns do not give arbitrage opportunity.

As some people will try it, they will lose far more.

It is not something that easy.