Last update: 2026-02-21_Sat_03.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Darker45 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Darker45
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Darker45" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66431372 (unedited backup) (by Oluwa-btc) (scraped on Sat Feb 21 03:22:25 CET 2026) in Seeking Insights on Effective Online Betting Strategies:
I think the most effective way to navigate the "treacherous waters of online betting" is not to look for the most effective gambling strategies to make profit but to behave according to the fact that gambling generally takes your money away rather than give you more.
Siding with reason, accepting the statistics that "99% of people end up losing money in the long run", will make you an effective online bettor, which means you'll spend money on gambling moderately and enjoy the games without expecting returns.
In fact to an extent,the quest for a better strategy becomes addictive and often becomes a problem.If it's to build something that could last more than just seeking a good strategy.You can still be doing this and attract yourself more losses
After all,the whole reason behind this is to make quick/fast wins early.
2. Post 66430826 (unedited backup) (by Furball808) (scraped on Fri Feb 20 23:23:25 CET 2026) in If War Comes Tomorrow: How Will Bitcoin React?:
Still, Bitcoin could actually rip higher—
Learning from venezuela...
Perhaps that's an altogether different scenario. It wasn't even a war. There was just a quick kidnapping, and that's it. If there was any resistance, it could be likened to a toddler trying to stop Mike Tyson.
We might learn something from Israel and US' attack on Iran last year, though. That was a serious one. Key political and military leaders, even nuclear scientists, were killed. The supreme leader was even targeted. Bombs on nuclear facilities were dropped. Facilities were destroyed. Iran even retaliated against the US by firing missiles at the US military base in Qatar.
That didn't affect the market, though. Bitcoin didn't care. It continued to rise and even hit an ATH a few months later. It might just be the same this time around, especially because sellers have already done their thing.
That’s what I’m thinking too. The ones left holding are mostly those who don’t believe in FUD and are in this in the long run. Unless they are directly affected by the war itself, they might not see any reason to take out their money from bitcoin. If anything this should be a time to put more money in.
3. Post 66429685 (unedited backup) (by Cheema02) (scraped on Fri Feb 20 18:30:01 CET 2026) in Savers are losing purchasing power quietly!:
That's why it's best to make use of your money than let it sleep in the bank. I don't mean to just spend it on whatever comes to mind. I mean, make it productive. It isn't easy, of course. It takes a lot of research, analysis, effort, time, discipline, and so on. But that's what it takes if you want your money to bear fruits.
However, that doesn't mean we totally avoid keeping money in the banks. We must always have to set aside a certain amount for emergencies and other unforeseen expenses. This amount we surrender, in a way, to slow death by inflation.
Your point about use money to make money is based on reality and its true that many individual thinks that to keep their savings in banks is safe but they don't know after a period of time due to inflation their money can lost its worth gradually. So if they invest thier money wisely instead of to take it in banks then money grows gradually with time and its becomes a source of income. But its not easy to investing money because its requires proper knowledge and planning and patience because in investing also there is a chance of loss. So maintain money in banks is also have importance because it help out in emergency. No doubt inflation can affects its value with time but its a useful way to stay stronger in panicked situation. So there for we should go in balanced situation like out of savings some money can be put in banks and the other is investing in good companies in this way we have financial security in the form of savings in banks and also our money keep growing through investment.
4. Post 66428296 (unedited backup) (by Smartvirus) (scraped on Fri Feb 20 10:51:49 CET 2026) in If War Comes Tomorrow: How Will Bitcoin React?:
That didn't affect the market, though. Bitcoin didn't care. It continued to rise and even hit an ATH a few months later. It might just be the same this time around, especially because sellers have already done their thing.
Bitcoin went from around $110k down to $98k (-10%) so I wouldn't say "bitcoin didn't care". Similarly oil went up roughly 10% IIRC back in June 2025. And that was minimal effect because Iran only focused on heavily battering Israel and only a handful of US bases in Syria and their Central Command in Qatar.
The fire exchange between Iran and NATO only lasted 13 days too, so it was short. Not enough time to devastate the global economy.
Obviously, there is always going to be a slight drop before it would find a way to bounce back should any war endure more than anticipated and I say this due to the fact that, it’s not uncommon that Bitcoin has being associated as a conflict resonate currency where, certain individuals try to fuel the conflict through Bitcoin donations to conflicting nations and as well, raise funds for arms giving using Bitcoin in conflicting nations which would in turn, increase its demand and price as well in these sad times.
5. Post 66428130 (unedited backup) (by pooya87) (scraped on Fri Feb 20 09:47:07 CET 2026) in If War Comes Tomorrow: How Will Bitcoin React?:
That didn't affect the market, though. Bitcoin didn't care. It continued to rise and even hit an ATH a few months later. It might just be the same this time around, especially because sellers have already done their thing.
Bitcoin went from around $110k down to $98k (-10%) so I wouldn't say "bitcoin didn't care". Similarly oil went up roughly 10% IIRC back in June 2025. And that was minimal effect because Iran only focused on heavily battering Israel and only a handful of US bases in Syria and their Central Command in Qatar.
The fire exchange between Iran and NATO only lasted 13 days too, so it was short.
What Iran did NOT do during those 13 days back in June were to:
- Shut down Strait of Hormuz and the rest of the sea routs I mentioned earlier
- Horizontally expanding the conflict that would affect the energy market
- Destroying the bulk of US military bases in the region
- Destroy or capture oil and gas fields under dictatorship tribes in the Persian Gulf
This time things will be different though and in retaliation, Iran will do all of the above and more which would affect the global economy harshly.
6. Post 66426962 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Thu Feb 19 22:58:07 CET 2026) in X to launch crypto trading in a couple of weeks:
So, not only is it convenient for clueless would-be victims Twitter users to access all kinds of information from a single platform, or arrive at any exchange's sign-up page, they also get to enjoy exclusive bait deals.
can't wait for all the things that will go wrong with this and to see people complaining about losing their money after they joined a pump and dump, etc... or however investing/trading grifters on twitter gonna abuse it. it's going to be a real shitshow.
Grok thinks that eToro could become X's partner for the Smart Cashtag transactions, but that's only speculation at this point.
i'm sure twitter users are going to love that considering where eToro is based.
7. Post 66424670 (unedited backup) (by Sandra_hakeem) (scraped on Thu Feb 19 12:14:55 CET 2026) in Steak 'n Shake comment after accepting bitcoin for payment 9 months ago:
I think EL MOHA is referring to regulatory policies, specifically the lack of recognition of Bitcoin as a currency. There must be businesses in some countries like Vietnam, Bangladesh, and others which would've otherwise wanted to publicly announce that they accept Bitcoin payments if not for Bitcoin's illegal status as a direct mode of payment or payment method for goods and services.
Some powerful people just don't want to have a channel of decentralized transactions that doesn't necessarily need to go through their corrupt protocols. That's how greedy they can be-- every medium is an opportunity to implement their taxation policies, and if they're not given a percentage or two, they
whine around and extend their sanctions. I think I see where this is going.
"Scared" to publicly declare that they accept bitcoin? Pardon my ignorance, but why? Is there a deeper secret that I don't know?
Businesses will be closed, and business owners will be arrested and subject to criminal and economic sanctions
(*). This is, at the very least, a threat to our country, especially in key tourist destinations. This news became a major local headline at the time, and no business dared to openly accept crypto to this day.
*)
https://coinvestasi.com/berita/kafe-di-bali-gunakan-kripto-sebagai-metode-pembayaranI read through the link, and I fear that this is not just mere threats anymore... Investors now have to deal with retributions for investing on what they think has a stronger growth pace, with their own money? I can't even make my choices anymore... Damn!!
But, why's the case different with Steak 'n Shake?
8. Post 66424232 (unedited backup) (by Curious T) (scraped on Thu Feb 19 10:05:55 CET 2026) in X to launch crypto trading in a couple of weeks:
With hundreds of millions of users, many of whom gullible, combined with all kinds of promotions, analyses, experts' signals, influencers, hype, charts, predictions, and whatnot posted and shared 24/7, it's certainly easier for Twitter to haul new users to partner brokers/exchanges. Which likely means these brokers/exchanges will, in turn, also be generous in terms of exclusive bonuses and other benefits.
With their lord and personal saviour, Elon, leading the campaign, it would be very easy to fool them. Twitter has been moving towards a certain way since he took over the app, and even though this is a long shot, I am not surprised that something like this is a possibility.
9. Post 66420112 (unedited backup) (by m2017) (scraped on Wed Feb 18 04:56:37 CET 2026) in BTC below $67K: temporary correlation or macro warning?:
As to "macro warning", of what particularly? I hope it isn't Bitcoin's impending death. Otherwise, it's the same old FUD recycled all over again.
I believe OP is referring to a further price decline. The desire (and expectation) of most people for an imminent rebound in bitcoin is still in the air, while, in my opinion, a further decline is clearly inevitable. Considering that bearish season has only just begun.
Since then, it hasn't reclaimed the 6-digit price. But this correction was somehow anticipated. It's in the cycle.
Yes, that's true. So why is everyone so confused about bitcoin falling under bearish pressure?

What's happening is normal in the current situation.
This bear market may be long, you can see that people are not ready to push bitcoin above $70000.
Of course, it will be long if it has always been like this.
The bear market will later be over but it may take few months.
A few months? You're just being optimistic.

Fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a long, drawn-out dive into the depths of bitcoin's price.

10. Post 66419699 (unedited backup) (by aioc) (scraped on Tue Feb 17 23:52:43 CET 2026) in Wardley - Dubois WBO Heavyweight Championship May 9 Manchester:
This is going to be explosive. It seems they can do away with judges with this one. And it could be anybody's fight, but I'm leaning more on Wardley. Dubois disappoints.
When two fighters with a combined knock-out average of 90% collide in the ring, we should not blink because anyone could knock out the other and end the fight.
This is what fights like to see: two fighters who have power and only know how to move forward, especially if it's a title fight. I'm leaning on Wardley, but I never ignore Dubois' power problem. With him, it's his motivation. It's bad for a boxer's reputation if they are a known quitter.
11. Post 66418293 (unedited backup) (by 0xredhot) (scraped on Tue Feb 17 16:58:31 CET 2026) in Singleplayer casino games vs multiplayer gambling games:
Casinos have options. There are games you can play alone, games you can play against other players, and games you play against the house. You can hop from one game to another depending on your preference or mood.
In plinko, flip, or wheel, would it really matter if you're playing against other players or the house? What makes the difference? Either way, it isn't a skill-based game, you're just relying entirely on luck to win. The results are random and you playing against other players doesn't involve any kind of strategy or any competitive edge.
I think you explained it the best i meant pvp only from fairness point, whereas whole pot is between you and other players and house takes small cut but things are completely random "luck based" so there is really still no need for pvp since it is not skill based.
12. Post 66418098 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Tue Feb 17 16:04:25 CET 2026) in The reality of Bitcoin and why you shouldn't be scared :
So in the image below, you could see that;
- In 2018-2019 Bear Run, it lasted for 365 days, while falling in value at 84%
- In 2019-2022 Bull Run, it lasted for 1065 days, while rising in value at 2000%
- In 2022-2023 Bear Run, it lasted for 365 days, while falling in value at 77%
- In 2023-2025 Bull Run, it lasted for 1066 days, while rising in value at 715%
Instead of copying superficial information from the image, next time include dates when you are referring to something like this otherwise it is quite an incomplete view of the situation.
-In 2025-2026 Bear Run, Bitcoin have just fallen more than 73% to 100% of it's previous All Time High (i.e from $126,200) and it is expected to last for another 365 days.
Expected by idiots. If you believe in this, then stake your whole net worth and take out loans to make the most profitable trade in your life. Of course you like most of these idiots won't do it, because you don't believe this.
-In 2026-2028 Bull Run, Bitcoin is expected to rise by 817%. Which also implies that by end of 2028/2029, the price of Bitcoin is expected to hit approximately $400,000 per BTC.
Complete nonsense. It is not expected to rise 817%, terrible example here and completely wrong. Fuck diminishing returns right, it is not as if it was already an established fact. Let's introduce a completely random expected increase in % that makes no sense whatsoever?

What are you saying? Bitcoin hasn't even fallen more than 50% yet.
It does not need to fall more than 50%, check your numbers and don't shitpost.
You are misinterpreting the chart again. They are speculating the 817% rise from the bottom of the crash ($30k-ish) which means they expect it to reach somewhere around $250k not $400k.
It is a terrible chart and the whole premise here is stupid. A crash to 30k would be a bad sign as it shows that decreases are not diminishing, but the upside is diminishing. $125k to $30k would be a 75% decrease.
13. Post 66413071 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Mon Feb 16 09:25:25 CET 2026) in Monitex: Monitoring with 80% Cashback in USDT:
Both the OP in this thread and the Swapwatch thread, linked to above in Darker45 reply, behave similarly. They have no intention to engage with Bitcointalk users, answer questions, or dispel any doubts voiced by people. Their bot-like activity is very suspicious. I wouldn't trust their monitoring services or the unknown exchanges they advertise.
Stay safe and don't get scammed!
14. Post 66412517 (unedited backup) (by Alpen) (scraped on Mon Feb 16 02:43:55 CET 2026) in Bitcoin Failed Its Ultimate Test:
So what if Trump was wrongly called the "first crypto president"? Does that mean he can "save BTC from closing the year in the red"? What makes you think he has that power?
If you come to assess Bitcoin's safe haven label when it's at the bottom, it surely failed. If you do it some other time, it easily passes the test with flying colors. To be fair, perhaps we should take a few steps back and take a look at Bitcoin's overall performance, not just short time frames.
Okay first of all bitcoin don't depends on title or controlled by politicians so you saying or they call trump crypto president, that do not mean that one person can control bitcoin, it's all about how demands , supply and also confidence on the way the global market or events goes.
And again this safe heaven label this don't mean that the price of bitcoin won't drop even when it comes to gold the price still fall sometimes, the thing is that even if it drops can the assets recover from it and holds value as the years pass by because instead of you focusing it if bitcoin is on red or green in a year it's just okay to ask because with this alone it has proven that no matter how the market seems it can still survive and in the terms of a long run bitcoin still holds its value or bitcoin is makes sense as an asset and solid reason to stand strong.
It takes very little for one person to tank Bitcoin by 60% if that person is the head of a major global power. Just look at the Chinese mining ban; those miners only survived because they found a safe haven in the US.
What happens if they are kicked out of the States by a Trump executive order? Or if the DOJ, under presidential direction, goes after Tether again? Remember 2018: Bitcoin plummeted 50% simply because Tether was caught up in US legal proceedings. Political decisions have massive consequences.
15. Post 66412487 (unedited backup) (by Alpen) (scraped on Mon Feb 16 02:16:01 CET 2026) in Bitcoin Failed Its Ultimate Test:
So what if Trump was wrongly called the "first crypto president"? Does that mean he can "save BTC from closing the year in the red"? What makes you think he has that power?
If you come to assess Bitcoin's safe haven label when it's at the bottom, it surely failed. If you do it some other time, it easily passes the test with flying colors. To be fair, perhaps we should take a few steps back and take a look at Bitcoin's overall performance, not just short time frames.
The mistake wasn’t calling Trump the "crypto president"—the real mistake was the crypto industry backing him in the election. He used crypto for personal enrichment, and now the Democrats are gearing up for investigations. We’re likely to see a wave of anti-crypto legislation framed as a crackdown on "political bribery." None of this is going to end well for the market.
16. Post 66412075 (unedited backup) (by SUPERSAIAN) (scraped on Sun Feb 15 23:01:49 CET 2026) in How long would you stay before gambling?:
Of course. The longer you stay in the casino, the more you're hooked on it, and the harder it would be to leave. I think it would be best to set a definite length of time when gambling rather than keep it open.
The risk isn't that you'd be having so much fun you'd completely forget about the time; it's that you'd continue gambling despite not enjoying it anymore. There are many gamblers who aren't excited anymore, already bored, but continue on betting, can't seem to detach themselves from it even if it's supposed to be over.
A person without a plan, someone who doesn't have a strategy, is always adrift, so setting a timer and leaving when the time is up is the best approach. I think even if you're addicted, you can maintain this discipline; it's necessary to do this to feel good about yourself. If you leave when the time is up, you'll feel really good because you've kept your promise to yourself. I bet on sports, and I set different limits for myself there and try not to exceed them.
17. Post 66412061 (unedited backup) (by Odohu) (scraped on Sun Feb 15 22:59:25 CET 2026) in How long would you stay before gambling?:
Of course. The longer you stay in the casino, the more you're hooked on it, and the harder it would be to leave. I think it would be best to set a definite length of time when gambling rather than keep it open.
You might be right about that but our intention is what determines how the end will look like, if your intention is to have fun with it trust me you can gamble as much as you like even though you would want to spend the whole of your day and you won't regret it that's if your mind is fixed to have fun but it's advised to set a limit while gambling just as we also have limit in other things we do which gambling is even more dangerous than most of the things we set limit while doing it so it is good for us to also apply that same method in gambling, by so doing it shows that we are gambling responsibly.
No matter your intention you must always
18. Post 66411806 (unedited backup) (by Versatile_choice) (scraped on Sun Feb 15 21:39:31 CET 2026) in How long would you stay before gambling?:
Of course. The longer you stay in the casino, the more you're hooked on it, and the harder it would be to leave. I think it would be best to set a definite length of time when gambling rather than keep it open.
You might be right about that but our intention is what determines, if your intention is to have fun with it trust me you can gamble as much as you like even though you would want to spend the whole of your day and you won't regret it that's if your mind is fixed to have fun but it's advised to set a limit while gambling just as we also have limit in other things we do which gambling is even more dangerous than most of the things we set limit while doing it so it is good for us to also apply that same method in gambling, by so doing it shows that we are gambling responsibly.
19. Post 66411641 (unedited backup) (by ETZ-Swap) (scraped on Sun Feb 15 20:48:25 CET 2026) in ETZ-Swap anonymous cryptocurrency exchange:
Hello Darker45,
First of all, apologies for the long silence on this thread.
Over the past few months, we had very limited direct access to Bitcointalk. At the same time, our team was heavily focused on strengthening the core of ETZ-Swap — improving user anonymity and security mechanisms, expanding our liquidity pool, and resolving several structural matters with partners and integrations.
These upgrades required significant internal resources, and we chose to prioritize infrastructure and product stability before returning to public communication.
We’re now fully back online here and ready to actively maintain and develop this topic again.
Regarding your previous points:
1. Fee competitiveness — yes, that’s something we’ve been actively optimizing. Liquidity expansion was one of the key steps to improve execution quality and rates.
2. KYCnot.me — we appreciate the suggestion. We are open to pursuing verified/approved listing status and will follow up accordingly.
We’re here to stay and ready to continue the discussion.
20. Post 66410855 (unedited backup) (by Mhizlove) (scraped on Sun Feb 15 17:36:13 CET 2026) in Bitcoin Failed Its Ultimate Test:
So what if Trump was wrongly called the "first crypto president"? Does that mean he can "save BTC from closing the year in the red"? What makes you think he has that power?
If you come to assess Bitcoin's safe haven label when it's at the bottom, it surely failed. If you do it some other time, it easily passes the test with flying colors. To be fair, perhaps we should take a few steps back and take a look at Bitcoin's overall performance, not just short time frames.
Okay first of all bitcoin don't depends on title or controlled by politicians so you saying or they call trump crypto president, that do not mean that one person can control bitcoin, it's all about how demands , supply and also confidence on the way the global market or events goes.
And again this safe heaven label this don't mean that the price of bitcoin won't drop even when it comes to gold the price still fall sometimes, the thing is that even if it drops can the assets recover from it and holds value as the years pass by because instead of you focusing it if bitcoin is on red or green in a year it's just okay to ask because with this alone it has proven that no matter how the market seems it can still survive and in the terms of a long run bitcoin still holds its value or bitcoin is makes sense as an asset and solid reason to stand strong.
21. Post 66409669 (unedited backup) (by Jaweria parveen) (scraped on Sun Feb 15 09:06:20 CET 2026) in Bitcoin Failed Its Ultimate Test:
So what if Trump was wrongly called the "first crypto president"? Does that mean he can "save BTC from closing the year in the red"? What makes you think he has that power?
If you come to assess Bitcoin's safe haven label when it's at the bottom, it surely failed. If you do it some other time, it easily passes the test with flying colors. To be fair, perhaps we should take a few steps back and take a look at Bitcoin's overall performance, not just short time frames.
While he has not been performing very well in this, which is why we do not consider him to be very good. He promised to make crypto big, but he has not fulfilled it yet, which is why he is not using this power properly, while he is using this power well in his country. Bitcoin has fallen below its price for some time, this does not mean that Bitcoin or its growth has stopped, but it has the potential to rise this year with many big predictions. It is absolutely okay to do so because at this time everyone's eyes are on Bitcoin, if we do not make any changes in Bitcoin for a while, maybe it will seem to go up, so we should not invest in Bitcoin right now, although this time is good, but sometimes profitable investments have to be abandoned.
22. Post 66408769 (unedited backup) (by Hypnosis00) (scraped on Sat Feb 14 22:54:49 CET 2026) in How long would you stay before gambling?:
Of course. The longer you stay in the casino, the more you're hooked on it, and the harder it would be to leave. I think it would be best to set a definite length of time when gambling rather than keep it open.
The risk isn't that you'd be having so much fun you'd completely forget about the time; it's that you'd continue gambling despite not enjoying it anymore. There are many gamblers who aren't excited anymore, already bored, but continue on betting, can't seem to detach themselves from it even if it's supposed to be over.
As long as there is greed, even the games have become boring, these gamblers can't stop themselves from gambling especially if they have been losing already a huge amount. And most of them are gambling addicts, so they don't just gamble for their greed for money, but they gamble its because their mind can no longer stop them from satisfying their gambling addiction.
At the end of the day, gambling is just all about time management and responsible gambling, if you can't do it, you'll definitely fall into gambling addiction.
23. Post 66407486 (unedited backup) (by tbct_mt2) (scraped on Sat Feb 14 16:19:43 CET 2026) in Question about BTC fork:
Bitcoin fork isn't just a possibility, it's a necessity. Bitcoin has to upgrade. Otherwise, it would get stuck and grow obsolete. Surely, Bitcoin at its current state isn't its best version at all times, forever, especially taking into consideration technological developments. For example, when quantum computers finally become a thing in the future, Bitcoin has to adjust. There's most likely a fork.
However, you have to take note that there isn't just one type of fork. There's soft fork--backward compatible upgrades, doesn't require a blockchain split. There's hard fork--non-backward compatible, results into two separate networks. There's even a kind of fork which simply involves just copying Bitcoin's code like Litecoin, although some don't consider it as such.
Bitcoin forks are necessary things for Bitcoin technical improvements, upgrades to make it stronger, better and more convenient as well as feasible with time so generally it's good. It's only bad if scammers try to use forks for creating their shitcoins as their easy tools to scam people, steal money of people in the market while they don't actually have any technical capability of developments their "projects" after forking from Bitcoin source codes and Bitcoin chain.
Bitcoin fork is a technical feature that is either good or bad depends on people behind each fork but Bitcoin is only one, the longest Bitcoin chain, while other chains are weaker and most of them are useless too.