Last update: 2025-09-17_Wed_04.48h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

Darker45 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Darker45
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "Darker45" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 65814769 (unedited backup) (by Bluedrem) (scraped on Wed Sep 17 04:19:01 CEST 2025) in Time Preference Change for Bitcoin:

Quote from: Darker45 on September 16, 2025, 03:26:18 AM
People's high time preference isn't only founded upon the fiat system. A continuously decaying fiat doesn't stop many from saving in it. In the same manner that an asset that can very well protect one's worth for generations doesn't necessarily encourage many to save. Delayed gratification isn't everybody's cup of tea. There are people who abide by the 'eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow you will perish' principle.
There are many people who, before they became aware of Bitcoin, did not give much importance to saving money despite having high discretionary income. They used it for fun or for other unnecessary purposes. Because they thought that inflation would reduce the value of their money and its purchasing power. That is, they could buy less things with the same amount of money at that time than they could buy with the same amount of money later. As a result, they preferred to use their money instead of saving. But when Bitcoin came to the market, it started showing more effectiveness against inflation than gold. As a result, people started getting attracted to saving because they now have the safest and most profitable asset to deposit any amount of money in the future, and that is Bitcoin. Honestly, the more Bitcoin they have instead of fiat currency, the stronger their economy will be in the future.



2. Post 65814317 (unedited backup) (by The Cryptovator) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 23:15:26 CEST 2025) in Should I trade back again with Binance? :

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 05:46:35 AM
The restriction was lifted just a few weeks ago? So, it took them almost a year to resolve your issue? Or did I get it right? If yes, don't you think it took them too long to decide on your concern, therefore, it's goodbye to them?

But if it's Binance where you can find all that you're looking for in a centralized exchange, they may deserve a second chance. At the end of the day, what you went through with Binance you may also experience in other centralized exchanges, perhaps even worse considering that Binance is one of the most trusted and reliable in the market.

As for my personal experience, I ditched Binance for good and moved to another popular platform. They're almost similar, anyway.
You are right; it's been almost a year since I had the issues with Binance. In the meantime I have been using another exchange like Bybit. It's also been a smooth exchange so far from my experience. Binance was my first choice, to be honest, and I was quite disappointed due to restrictions. For security reasons I don't store funds in an exchange after the issue with Binance. So when I need to sell or buy coins, I like to move them on multiple exchanges. Because I really don't want to rely on the single exchange.

However, I have been using Binance again right now and don't have any issues yet. Hopefully they lifted my restrictions after a deep investigation. So there shouldn't be an issue with them unless I made mistakes again. The funds I have been dealing with are fully clean and come from Bybit. So there won't be an issue like a mixer or something else. I will be very careful when dealing with the CEX.



3. Post 65811898 (unedited backup) (by Don Pedro Dinero) (scraped on Tue Sep 16 10:32:14 CEST 2025) in Time Preference Change for Bitcoin:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 03:26:18 AM
People's high time preference isn't only founded upon the fiat system. A continuously decaying fiat doesn't stop many from saving in it.

Those who save in fiat currency do not have much understanding of economics and finance.

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 03:26:18 AM
In the same manner that an asset that can very well protect one's worth for generations doesn't necessarily encourage many to save. Delayed gratification isn't everybody's cup of tea. There are people who abide by the 'eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow you will perish' principle.

Yes, but that's like the story of the cicada and the ant. Who will be better off in 10 years, someone who does DCA bitcoin or someone who spends everything on Carpe Diem?

What I do see a lot, and something that is mentioned in the OP, is that people are becoming increasingly aware of inflation as theft, and I think Bitcoin has played an important role in that.



4. Post 65805390 (unedited backup) (by Mpamaegbu) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 15:41:14 CEST 2025) in Share How to Keep Crypto Safe While Connected to Public Wifi:

Quote from: Darker45 on September 13, 2025, 12:58:55 AM
If it's possible, you limit the use of public Wi-Fi to your devices where sensitive information aren't stored, important accounts aren't logged in, and so on. You also limit your transactions to ones that don't involve opening your wallet or sending funds.
Doing all that, trying to be cautious of what sites to open and what not to open, sounds like stress on its own. That's why I don't even bother connecting to any public WiFi. I rather wait out the period I'm not able to connect to mine than do that and jeopardize my security. I bet it's because people don't pay to use public WiFi that makes it tempting to use. If people were to be charged for using it, a lot of people won't use it. They will stick to their own data. People should be careful of freebies.



5. Post 65804021 (unedited backup) (by Marvell1) (scraped on Sun Sep 14 06:32:20 CEST 2025) in Do you see Bitcoin overshadowing the relevance of dollar in the future?:

Quote from: Darker45 on September 13, 2025, 12:02:15 AM
Bitcoin doesn't "secure our assets from malware attacks".

Bitcoin can only help us take full control of our assets, reducing our dependence on third parties. It cannot guarantee that our assets are immune to attacks and completely safe if we are careless. The safety of our assets depends entirely on us.

Quote
It's not simply knowledge that hinders people from using Bitcoin for payments. Even those who thoroughly understand Bitcoin are somewhat hindered by its price volatility, limited acceptance, regulations, even price appreciation, and so on.

There are many reasons why people don't want to use bitcoin as a currency or payment method. One of them is bitcoin investors themselves do not want to spend, most of them want to hold bitcoin to get rich.
That is why I disagree with those who blame the government and claim that it is the only reason why bitcoin is not used as a payment method.

Quote
For as long as the fiat standard remains in place, fiat will rule mainstream finance.
I think it is the government that decides this. As long as they still want to use fiat, no asset/currency can replace the role of fiat.



6. Post 65802109 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 18:12:07 CEST 2025) in Places where you can travel with Bitcoin in 2025:

Quote from: Darker45 on June 30, 2025, 01:49:56 AM
Bitcoin-accepting restaurants, accommodation, spa, stores, and others are sparsely found across the country, but if you want a specific place where you can easily spend your Bitcoin on pretty much everything, it's gonna be Boracay Island or what they're now calling the Bitcoin Island.
---
I was there 2 or 3 years ago and, indeed, you can easily find 'Bitcoin accepted here' stickers all over the place. You can find a place to stay, eat, get a tattoo, have a haircut, grab a drink, get a massage, and everything else using Bitcoin.
~snip~


I watched a few videos on YT and what I had the opportunity to see was that the payment processor through which the payment was made had closed its business and most of the several hundred stores, hotels, etc. had stopped accepting BTC. I think I saw that news a year or maybe even more ago, so I don't know if anything has changed since then.

I remember watching a couple of videos of tourists walking around the island and trying to pay something with BTC, but unfortunately only BTC stickers remained.



7. Post 65801704 (unedited backup) (by TypoTonic) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 16:26:49 CEST 2025) in The economic activity of waiting in line.:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 01:36:21 AM
Yeah, that's so true. Opportunity, money, time, and so on are wasted in traffic, may it be on the roads, banks, malls, airports, and so on. Yeah, the solution is to be able to make transactions without physically appearing. You don't have to fall in line because you can pay your bills, for example, or request something online or from a phone, from wherever you are.

The problem, I agree, is that traffic is now experienced online as well. As a matter of fact, there are situations where it's better for you to appear physically than keep on waiting online or on the phone.

How many times have we been frustrated because a site has crashed? How many times have wasted so much time refreshing a page because it can't handle the traffic anymore? How many times have we made transactions over the phone and asked to wait because everybody's busy in the office. There are moments when the solution becomes more problematic than the problem.
I was going to bring up traffic as well before I read this reply. It's the form of waiting in line that I hate the most. Tongue

Quote from: CTO114 on September 12, 2025, 12:27:31 PM
The concern of this writer is, could we see an overcrowding in the digital space, and start to wait in line, as a result of network issues or variables like that.
The thing is, there will always be some sort of downtime in whatever solution we come up with. Just like how accidents can occur anytime in physical traffic, there can also be unexpected jams in digital traffic.​

Quote from: CTO114 on September 12, 2025, 12:27:31 PM
Something to factor in when thinking of the next economic breakthrough!
Technology is getting more and more advanced everyday. Could AI potentially help in the next big breakthrough? Or will it only make it worse?



8. Post 65800559 (unedited backup) (by Zlantann) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 10:14:01 CEST 2025) in The economic activity of waiting in line.:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 01:36:21 AM
Yeah, that's so true. Opportunity, money, time, and so on are wasted in traffic, may it be on the roads, banks, malls, airports, and so on. Yeah, the solution is to be able to make transactions without physically appearing. You don't have to fall in line because you can pay your bills, for example, or request something online or from a phone, from wherever you are.

The problem, I agree, is that traffic is now experienced online as well. As a matter of fact, there are situations where it's better for you to appear physically than keep on waiting online or on the phone.

How many times have we been frustrated because a site has crashed? How many times have wasted so much time refreshing a page because it can't handle the traffic anymore? How many times have we made transactions over the phone and asked to wait because everybody's busy in the office. There are moments when the solution becomes more problematic than the problem.

Everything that has an advantage also has its disadvantages. You would have been expected to drive to the bank if you wanted to make some transactions but online banking has helped to alleviate that burden. It has saved us time and the resources that are needed to appear physically in banks. 

Online activities have also given rise to scams and hacks. You wouldn't worry much about losing your money to scammers if you have to appear in banks for transactions. The worst part about these network issues caused by overcrowding is that it halts the entire operations of the bank. I also remember how transaction fees skyrocketed during the attack on the mempool by Ordinals because of network congestion.       



9. Post 65799997 (unedited backup) (by tbct_mt2) (scraped on Sat Sep 13 05:51:55 CEST 2025) in Do you see Bitcoin overshadowing the relevance of dollar in the future?:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 12:02:15 AM
Bitcoin doesn't "secure our assets from malware attacks". Neither does Bitcoin require "face verification, 2FA, email verification, and the likes." Those that offer security for your assets, those that require all types of KYC and verification are services that don't represent Bitcoin at the very least. On the contrary, they're an antithesis to what Bitcoin stands for
Bitcoin blockchain is what secure your bitcoin with its very good Proof of Work network that is high in hashrate, decentralized enough so that it is impossible for 51% attack. Even there are some "friend" mining pools that can cooperate with each other and are able to do 51% attacks, they have no reasons and achievable benefits for doing such attacks.

Bitcoin private keys are unbreakable, not possible for brute-forced and they are all contributors for your fund security with Bitcoin blockchain and bitcoins.

Quote from: https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook/blob/develop/ch04_keys.adoc
The size of Bitcoin’s private key space (2256) is an unfathomably large number. It is approximately 1077 in decimal. For comparison, the visible universe is estimated to contain 1080 atoms.



10. Post 65799050 (unedited backup) (by eightdots) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 22:14:55 CEST 2025) in Earning salary or owning a business which is better :

Quote from: rachael9385 on Today at 06:56:16 PM
If it's possible to have both, that's better. You'd have a safety net. Your business could go south. Your job could grow unbearably toxic. At least you have a continuous source of income if you lose either.

But if I were to choose only one, I'd certainly be choosing business, but it's not because the salary earners are spending their money on me. I'm also spending my money on other businesses and services they got their salaries from. The reasons are mainly freedom and being your own boss. Those are priceless.

There's a possibility to that but it all depends on that type of business that you are running, it's going to be hard to stay focused on keeping your business moving and being a worker that earns salary. No matter how we view this business will always remain superior. Being a salary earner will only keep you limited. The people you work for wouldn't want you to rise above them, they will keep paying you peanuts so you can keep working

Having both resources is a significant advantage, but it's rarely possible. Many people dream of starting a business while still working a salaried job, but it's important to understand and evaluate the market's challenges. We can take the risk of leaving our jobs and becoming a business owner, and the outcome can be exactly what we want. My point here is that we need to carefully evaluate all the circumstances and make informed decisions. If we have sufficient capital, owning a business isn't difficult. The most important thing is to ensure the continuity of the business and generate profits.

Owning your own business and earning the income you desire is a wonderful feeling. In business, even with a good salary, you can often improve your circumstances to a certain extent. Furthermore, making the right investments can help a salaried employee achieve their goals.



11. Post 65798760 (unedited backup) (by rachael9385) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 20:56:19 CEST 2025) in Earning salary or owning a business which is better :

Quote from: Darker45 on August 23, 2025, 12:56:51 AM
If it's possible to have both, that's better. You'd have a safety net. Your business could go south. Your job could grow unbearably toxic. At least you have a continuous source of income if you lose either.

But if I were to choose only one, I'd certainly be choosing business, but it's not because the salary earners are spending their money on me. I'm also spending my money on other businesses and services they got their salaries from. The reasons are mainly freedom and being your own boss. Those are priceless.

There's a possibility to that but it all depends on that type of business that you are running, it's going to be hard to stay focused on keeping your business moving and being a worker that earns salary. No matter how we view this business will always remain superior. Being a salary earner will only keep you limited. The people you work for wouldn't want you to rise above them, they will keep paying you peanuts so you can keep working



12. Post 65798289 (unedited backup) (by Figerland Shamrock) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 18:39:14 CEST 2025) in No bet is a waste :

Quote from: Darker45 on March 10, 2023, 12:55:21 AM
There is actually such a thing as a waste bet. I once placed bets before on matches and leagues that I knew nothing of. I only made those bets because of a stranger like you who recommended to bet on this and that. The same with yours, the advice was also to bet only small amounts. I lost almost all of those bets. I consider them all as waste bets.

But, yeah, please do your thing. Dropping daily odds here is probably not in violation of any forum rule. So you have the chance to build your reputation. I will probably copy your bets someday if you've proven that your odds are winning.
I agree with your way of thinking. The point is, we must first understand how to play the game, because if we don't understand it well, we will regret it in the end.
If we try it just because someone else suggested it, without knowing how to play it, we will be the ones who lose out.



13. Post 65796418 (unedited backup) (by danadc) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 07:34:01 CEST 2025) in What is your perspective on the increasing number of casinos?:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 03:54:59 AM
But that's not necessarily saying there are many gamblers therefore the number of casinos rise. It's true that if casinos are pretty much everywhere, that there's a 24/7 access to it anytime anywhere, that ads are shown on tv, aired on radio, printed on newspapers, displayed on billboards, and so on, the tendency that non-gamblers are attracted is high.

It is a reality because from our phones we can play whenever we like, it is a convenience, because no matter what the weather is like we can have access and we do not have to wait to go to a place for this type of fun, but the risk will always be the same, and Growth will increase, that is why casinos have more publicity and much more reach to those areas that do have internet can enjoy it, it is also an Advantage.



14. Post 65796157 (unedited backup) (by MusaMohamed) (scraped on Fri Sep 12 04:15:49 CEST 2025) in Dealing with the bear market season of Bitcoin :

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 01:51:27 AM
If only I have the money, I'd be buying every bear season. That's the only time one can buy Bitcoin at a bargained price. Once Bitcoin starts to recover, you'd say goodbye to discounted prices. Although there are always dips along the way, the price won't be as cheap. You'd be waiting for the next Bitcoin winter for the best deals. It may take years. So, yeah, I certainly consider a bear market a good time for buying, an opportunity to fill my wallet.
Dollar Cost Averaging strategy can help you to invest your money in bitcoin with time, gradually but very regularly over time. The invesment money for each purchase with DCA strategy can be small but over time like 1 year, 2 years, 4 years or 8 years, it will sum up to a very big investment capital.

This DCA calculator shows that if you invest $100 monthly in Bitcoin, and have done it for four years since 12 September 2021 so far, total investment capital you have invested is $4,900 which is big enough or even impossible for you to spend in one purchase.
https://costavg.com/



15. Post 65795171 (unedited backup) (by Dogedegen) (scraped on Thu Sep 11 20:43:31 CEST 2025) in Will the under developed nations come out of its under development?:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 12:25:15 AM
There's probably corruption everywhere. There's corruption in both developed and underdeveloped nations. It's just that in most underdeveloped nations corruption is so rampant that what goes into public services is what little left after every politician fills his/her pocket.
Yes but also no, you understand it wrongly. If there are 10 thieves and there is a $100 budget, they may steal $90 or even $99 because each gets a small portion. If there are 10 thieves and there is a $100 000 budget, they may steal only 10% and be satisfied from this single plunder. Corruption is rampant in developed nations, but there are 2 key differences. First is that it is much smarter, involving NGOs, kickbacks, board membership and other deals. Second is that there is a much larger pile of money from which you can steal. As I have demonstrated 2 cases, the theft will be much more obvious in the first one than in the second one.

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 12:25:15 AM
No, it's not the government; it's the people. The government can only be as good as the people. The government is a reflection of the people. It doesn't have a soul of its own. It's the people that form the government.
I am not sure that I can agree with this. Maybe a majority of the people in a country? I am not sure even about that. The most consistent complaint that I hear about governments everywhere is corruption.



16. Post 65792897 (unedited backup) (by bitwalhr) (scraped on Thu Sep 11 07:27:07 CEST 2025) in Will the under developed nations come out of its under development?:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 12:25:15 AM

Most under developed nations have their corruption problem, the reason why it is very hard for them to move forward. The government itself is the problem not the people. There are so many small countries with very limited resources and yet they are already progressive countries. And that means, any country can get out of like being in the third world depending on the officials that will handle their country.

There's probably corruption everywhere. There's corruption in both developed and underdeveloped nations. It's just that in most underdeveloped nations corruption is so rampant that what goes into public services is what little left after every politician fills his/her pocket.

No, it's not the government; it's the people. The government can only be as good as the people. The government is a reflection of the people. It doesn't have a soul of its own. It's the people that form the government.
[/quote]
 Corruption and weak structures are the biggest problems in developing countries which fail to achieve long-term success despite having essential resources and a skilled workforce.
Most countries struggle to bring about changes to their education systems as they recognize its importance for success few countries in Africa have sufficient resources to support good development but internal issues hinder their progress these nations have never been on track to achieve success.
Awareness is crucial as developing countries that fail to utilize their resources effectively will be vulnerable to exploitation by developed countries which can limit their ability to succeed in the long run.*



17. Post 65792648 (unedited backup) (by BlackBoss_) (scraped on Thu Sep 11 04:19:25 CEST 2025) in Blockchain use:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 01:35:15 AM
It's not about the use of Bitcoin. This is more of taking advantage of a technology also used by Bitcoin for something else. The blockchain technology can be used outside Bitcoin or without necessarily integrating cryptocurrency.
Bitcoin is not a first ever cryptocurrency but it is a first ever successful one and it plays very big role of pioneering blockchain technology to a new era which is massively developed and accepted by business, governments and people. The blockchain technology can be applied for all industries and areas so it's a world-changing technology and it's good as Bitcoin is a leader of this technological innovation.

Bitcoin prehistory.



18. Post 65792156 (unedited backup) (by AmoreJaz) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 23:49:19 CEST 2025) in Will the under developed nations come out of its under development?:

Quote from: Darker45 on September 09, 2025, 12:36:09 AM
Overall, I think they will. But it takes a lot of time for them. Many underdeveloped nations don't have consistent and continuous progress. Their development is feeble. It may happen that a decade of gains after tiny forward steps could be quickly erased after electing a wrong leader. Then, they will have to go back to square one.

There might come a time when they'll improve and get out of their abject condition, but they might remain as underdeveloped because by the time they've started, say, providing books for each pupil, the developed countries have already switched to something more advance.

Most under developed nations have their corruption problem, the reason why it is very hard for them to move forward. The government itself is the problem not the people. There are so many small countries with very limited resources and yet they are already progressive countries. And that means, any country can get out of like being in the third world depending on the officials that will handle their country.



19. Post 65790814 (unedited backup) (by Juicyhome) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 16:47:43 CEST 2025) in 🏆 If You're New to Crypto Here's Some Stuff I Wish Someone Told Me Early On:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 12:23:46 AM
I don't see the advice that I, and probably the majority, wished someone would have given me early on, better yet with an assurance that it could be one of the best things I can do in a lifetime. And that's to buy as much as I can and hodl it. The rest like avoiding keeping altcoins or investing in NFTs, taking note of the dos and don'ts, learning other technicalities, and others may only come as secondary.

To those who got it and didn't take heed of it, I guess this is easily their topmost regret.
What i get from your advice that is new to me is never to keep altcoins, its very strange to me. The person that introduced me to crypto advised me to buy more promising  altcoins and hodl because bitcoin is very high to buy and i wont make good profit from bitcoin since what i have to invest was not much. I bought some altcoins and during the altcoin bull run i made some cool cash.

I only sold the profit and left my capital, as a write all my capital has gone to zero, i regret keeping my altcoin now, i wish i knew about this long ago. I do not want to sell them, i believe it will rise again then i will sell everything.



20. Post 65790108 (unedited backup) (by xenomorfo) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 13:03:55 CEST 2025) in India Bans All Money-Based Online Games:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 01:29:46 AM
I'm not affected by the ban because I'm not from India, but there seem to be similarities with what's happening in my country right now.

Lately, my government has also taken an aggressive step against online gambling, and even more aggressive proposals. Those who are against it are saying the same thing: that gamblers would only resort to illegal gambling, that the government would lose revenue, that gambling operations would be outside the oversight of authorities, that there'd be no more safeguards and protection for gamblers, and so on.

For me, it's all about serious implementation of regulations. Otherwise, an outright ban is better.

yes ok, I'm not taken into consideration either, I'm not even Indian and I don't even gamble
banning things, as I was saying before, doesn't work
We need to educate people, make them understand that it's okay to give space to their interests and hobbies but without exaggerating.



21. Post 65789759 (unedited backup) (by Die_empty) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 10:56:26 CEST 2025) in How Long Should You Hold Bitcoin for a Passive Income:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 02:15:16 AM
I'm afraid you're being too optimistic to the point that you seem detached from reality. If you plot your predictions on a graph, it would look far from the graph that contains Bitcoin's actual performance in the past. You seem to have even completely disregarded bear seasons. Annual growths are also too high. It's simply unrealistic.

I guess it's enough for us to stack as much Sats as possible and avoid setting timelines. We're in an uncertain market. We stack Sats, hodl, and take profit at the best possible time. Also, let's have our main sources of income outside Bitcoin investment. It doesn't seem prudent to assume a generous annual yield from it.
Good advice, mate.
Nothing is certain in the crypto industry. Most people didn't predict that the SEC would approve Bitcoin Spot ETF last year. But the approval had a great impact on the market. Who knew that Donald Trump would campaign with cryptocurrency? Every Bitcoin circle comes with a different experience, making the unpredictable. Invest the amount you can afford to live without and don't expect too much.     



22. Post 65789557 (unedited backup) (by Publictalk792) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 09:40:49 CEST 2025) in How Long Should You Hold Bitcoin for a Passive Income:

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 02:15:16 AM
I'm afraid you're being too optimistic to the point that you seem detached from reality. If you plot your predictions on a graph, it would look far from the graph that contains Bitcoin's actual performance in the past. You seem to have even completely disregarded bear seasons. Annual growths are also too high. It's simply unrealistic.

I guess it's enough for us to stack as much Sats as possible and avoid setting timelines. We're in an uncertain market. We stack Sats, hodl, and take profit at the best possible time. Also, let's have our main sources of income outside Bitcoin investment. It doesn't seem prudent to assume a generous annual yield from it.
You are right that it is good to be realistic and not overly optimistic with Bitcoin predictions especially since market has ups and downs. Good strategy is to simply buy and hold Bitcoin for long term and sell when time is right other than trying to perfectly time market. It is also good idea to have other ways of making money means diversifying your money and not rely on Bitcoin as your main source of income as this is much safer way to manage your finances.



23. Post 65789103 (unedited backup) (by MusaMohamed) (scraped on Wed Sep 10 04:49:55 CEST 2025) in Money need reasons to move :

Quote from: Darker45 on Today at 01:08:27 AM
In reality, however, it's the ordinary people who find it hard to move money. You go to a remittance center, you're asked forms to fill in, questions to answer, and so on. You bring money via plane, you have to make reports, satisfy power-tripping staff's questions, erase their suspicions, and so on. In the banks, you have to prove your financial capacity, your source of funds, and so forth.

Meanwhile, from where I am, government officials are moving billions not just within the country but also across international borders. Their stolen wealth easily reach their offshore accounts.
With Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, you can bring your wallets and wallet backups around easily as they are more easily portable than gold, cash for example, and you can control your wallets, coins, transactions (with non custodial wallets) without dependence on any bank to broadcast transactions.

This is an interesting discussion on how to get through customs at airports with your bitcoins.
What would be the best way to get through customs at an airport with your Btc?

It's also necessarily to share another article.
How to back up a seed phrase?