Those situation will continue to became questionable, because the problem is lots of people blindly trust those institution then believe that what information is true and backed by deep research. The problem is there are some unfair articles they released just like that Bitcoin carbon footprint and its really unfair since their articles have many flaws. Seems they are biased with it and just want to throw some bad shade against Bitcoin.

That's why we should not trust all information released by prestigious schools but rather its good to verify the datas they released so people can fact check it. Those situations is need to be carefully check by Ai bot creators. So they can avoid adding unfair reviews which affect the integrity not only with Bitcoin also with other subjects out there.

I agree with @Darker45 that "the only way to completely avoid the addictive pleasure of gambling is to avoid it completely."

I can agree with you @nimogsm that playing demo games at a casino or playing poker with friends might be somewhat safe if it's without real money, but very few people play without real money because they don't find the real fun they find in gambling with real money and being exposed to winning and excitement.

Gambling can be completely safe. For example, a demo mode at a casino or a game of poker with friends-why not? The thrill is there. It's all about the price of the game and how much someone is willing to spend and lose. If a player is disciplined, minimum bets aren't a problem, and they'll spend the equivalent of two cups of cappuccino during a gaming session and then go about their business.

If the government will successfully take the control of Bitcoin, it will totally lose the whole point of its decentralize in nature. Also even if they force that situation to happen. For sure the community will not allow and reject that to happen since people would like Bitcoin to be in current condition.

Well the hardfork will provably preserves its decentralized version. Also we could see it on history that the support will continue to flow on Bitcoins original principles. So that means government cannot change its current status since this is somehow protected by its concensus.

Good question.
My guess is that the creators had a reason to add those particular institutions and sources to the database. Each study, research paper, or article used to feed this AI bot was most probably checked beforehand to ensure it isn't FUD itself. They say that they would apply the same method to each new contribution and addition to the site. Therefore, it would be weird if they didn't stick to doing that from the very beginning.

The bolded part is very correct. If every manager pay posts there, that board will be a spam fest. This is because you don't need any special knowledge or skill to post there. Any body can engage in every thread there because they are topics of general knowledge.


O no! is this not much for them?

Because it's a pain in the ass to do it!

The whole system is already stretched with the delays on bets, the odds on live games, now you're adding a few more variables on top of that, which would again reflect in the odds bookies put out, to make it work flawlessly, you will need to invest a ton in it, same as trading websites do, but with the extra difficulty of tying it to live events not just trade settlements.

Nice in theory, I would definitely use it but probably not worth taking for most bookies.


Sorry, but you could not be further away from the truth.
I've been cashing out bets early for a decade, it never happened that one would not be available unless it was 2 -3 seconds for the finish!

The AI has improved a lot in past few years that now it can do many of the tasks that in past were done by teams. Since, each new model or model update brings improvement to many scores of AI thus now many companies find human employees as burden and that's why they're firing their employees.

This is time for those who're good at AI because it's the new tech and learning it is important for everyone if they want to survive. I believe AI hasn't reduced opportunists but it has increased opportunists for many of those who previously lack skills.

By using AI and doing prompting in the right way, skill less people can also make some money.  Companies can now use AI agents to automate many tasks and that's another reason why they're removing their current human employees.