No, you aree wrong.

Make sure you do not do the arbitrage betting on the same gambling site and you are very fine. I have been betting since 2014 and I was an addict before.

I do not just post theory about this.

It was later I did not gamble as I was gambling before.

I have tried different strategies before including arbitrage betting.

The gambling sites are also making sure their owns do not give arbitrage opportunity.

As some people will try it, they will lose far more.

It is not something that easy.

Thank you for adding this, that is a huge point. The fact that other major aggregators like AskGamblers and Casino Guru also have them rated low proves that this isn’t just a random issue with Trustpilot. It’s a clear pattern across the entire industry.

And the situation is getting even more interesting right now. While the official support chooses to stay completely silent here on the forum, the info about this red banner is already leaking directly into their own casino platform chat.

I just saw regular players sharing the Trustpilot link right in the live chat on Shuffle.com, warning others about the fraud metrics. When a multi-million dollar business tries to ignore a serious transparency issue on Bitcointalk while their own active players are spamming links about it in their live chat, it shows that corporate damage control is completely failing.

People are starting to look past the flashy marketing and five-star numbers, and they want real answers. Let's see how long the team can keep pretending that everything is fine when their own community is bringing up these flags everywhere.

You can see many third party audits here:
https://tether.to/en/transparency/?tab=reports


They have been making such third party reports for quite some time. I don't quite why would those reports made by Independent Auditors wouldn't count.

Thank you both for keeping this discussion objective and analytical.

@Cointxz, to clarify my intentions: as a crypto user, my intention is simply to look at structural data and transparency. Calling systematic review fraud just a "wrong marketing decision" minimizes the core issue. Marketing decisions reflect management's ethics. If management approves buying bot farms to fake public trust, it sets a dangerous precedent.

@Darker45, thank you for bringing those critical numbers into the spotlight. That completely shifts the perspective. The fact that 55% of their organic reviews are 1-star explains exactly WHY they resorted to fraud—they desperately needed to drown out real user complaints with fake 5-star bot reviews. When a casino faces fraud accusations on Reddit and has to hide a wave of 1-star complaints using bot networks, it crosses the line from a "marketing mistake" into a systematic cover-up.

A reputable platform builds trust through fair gaming and solid support, not by buying bot farms to mask a 55% negative rating.

First thing came up on my mind is this case https://financefeeds.com/france-logged-77-crypto-abduction-and-extortion-cases-tax-data-may-explain-why when you said about kidnapping and other crimes.

This is really the big risk of those data leaking, because we don't know what are the other things those criminals have our data could do to us.

If cases like this happened and we know our data is compromised, better to prepare for any possible scams and maybe other more worse situation that might happen to us.

Accepted. Please update your profile and post your last post count.

If Bivol isn't training to be better than his previous fight, his warm-up fight and multiple fights with Beterbiev shouldn't be used as evidence that he knows how to be ready for him.
Second, a boxer's or any fighter's silence should not be used to assess their level of preparation or likelihood of winning the fight because some fighters deliberately choose to remain silent during the most challenging preparation while making the biggest preparation through training.

On the contrary, Beterbiev is very quiet, as I check his X account,



https://x.com/ABeterbiev/status/2062602644737155476

I think but now he should be ready for a comeback fight. But so far, from what I see, he might not be ready for the trilogy while Bivol is already having another fight in Callum Smith.

Bivol already had a warm up fight against Michael Eifert. He has fought Beterbiev enough times to know how to prepare for him. At this point, he might be trying to wait for Beterbiev to age out so that he can have the upper hand. That is why he’s been dragging his feet with making the trilogy happen. It’s the same strategy that Canelo used on GGG.

Not really.  The Coldcard victims were in actual full control of their own very low security Seed.  I mean.  I could create a really simplistic Brain Wallet right now and only because my Bitcoin gets sweeped in a couple of seconds it does not mean I did not have full control.

You have full control over the Seed you have.  If you generate a low security one or put it in a website telling you to give them your Seed to upgrade to post Quantum security, that is something else.  It is not becoming a myth at all.

If the banned players feel that they were unjustly punished for a crime they did not commit, they can take the legal route to sort things out or request that the case be looked into through whatever means they deem fit for the case. I have not heard or read much about this case, but I am expecting to hear news where those affected will spoke up about the injustice and unfair treatment. Seems nothing as such has come up yet.


I don't think that those players will be given such ban consequences if the game fixing claim wasn't so obvious for everyone to have noticed. I do not support actions without proper investigation, but sometimes when the offence is so obvious, there are little or no need at all for further investigations, not when there were witnesses on the spot.

What they need to find out is who is actually behind fixed like this. Players are just the smallest wheel in the whole situation, sometimes you can't even blame them 100% since you don't know if they might have been threatened to do what they did. Things like this surely happened before (thread wise), may it be debt to a bookie or any other situation where you don't really have control over your future. If a syndicate is coming to you saying do this or that or else, it's not easy. In many countries even going to the police is not really an option since we all know some syndicates have ties basically everywhere. Sad sad situation.

That's a solid set up. Which newbies could follow, since really better to keep a small amount on exchange. Somehow doing that make sense knowing that you need funds when you want to buy at right time if there's some solid changes in the market.

Also putting small funds on mobile wallet is good option, so that you can also do quick transaction on important matters if you are far away from your house.

But another thing need to do or consider. better put small amount on exchange then treat this up as what you can afford to let go, then their funds intended to hold should go on their cold storage for better protection.

If there is an affiliate model then the review is automatically dishonest, this is also not right. You have to see how they are disclosing conflict of interest and how they are creating their ranking. Some review sites give same visibility to negative cases as positive experiences.


A site can be useful even if it has affiliate model. For this, they must follow transparent methodology. For example no casino ranking can be changed due to commission rate. Sponsored placement must be clearly marked and there must be objective criteria in review. Personally, when I read casino review, I don't decide by looking at who the review site said was the best.. Rather, I look more at how they scored.

So yeah, there can be money making motive. But transparency is what let us judge whether that motive is corrupting the review or not.