It's natural to more badly want to watch a match on which you have a bet. It's easier to pass on watching a game when you've got no money at stake, unless perhaps it's a game which represents your city, town, or country against another in an important tournament.

In your industry, even in this specific board here on the forum, scammers abound. Therefore, skepticism is a must. Especially with an unknown and newly-launched exchange with zero reputation but with big claims, prudence and funds security demand that it be deemed a scam until proven otherwise. You aren't even registered, are you?

It's actually you who are difficult to understand. It's you who claimed "We don't use centralized exchanges" but it's also you who claimed "We pay out cryptocurrency directly from centralized exchanges".

It's you who specified maximum amounts of transaction but it's also you who mentioned "We can exchange any amount".

You said "We work directly with our own wallets" but also said "We do not pay out from our own addresses."

You said you don't want to compromise anonymity when asked to provide proof of reserve and yet you're exchanging cryptocurrencies on Binance, ByBit, and others where KYC is mandatory.

You're choosing the right name because at the very least you're shadowy.

He has just been through a really difficult time and that was his first fight since, I can understand the rustiness he showed in the first round. I am happy that he was able to find himself again within the break and come back really strong in the 2nd round to knockout Prenga.
Had Joshua not been able to win this fight, it would have been a really more difficulty place for him, because he would have the thought that he may never be able to recover fully to be fit enough to win a fight.
He needs more preparation for his next fight with Fury because unlike Prenga, Fury will not sit back and not fight back in the second round after just having a good first round.

According to the commentary,  that was one of the worst first round for Anthony Joshua in this history of his boxing career. We could see him laughing and giggling, but that was all psychological. ( deep down he was disappointed as shit).

What happened to Prenga after an explosive opening round? He was supposed to dictate the fight. After flooring Joshua two times, he wasn't throwing those punches anymore. Why was he suddenly on the defensive? Prenga's corner is probably aware Joshua legs are already giving up, but it seems they aren't taking advantage. Prenga himself seemed to be clueless how to continue moving forward and looked to his corner.

Anyway, great comeback for Joshua. The man has the punch. But it seems he doesn't have the legs. I doubt he could survive Fury's weight.

This would have been a shocker if AJ couldn't find his feets back after an early first round defeat, going down twice. My guess on the press would have been that he was still not over the trauma of the accident he had in Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, Sagamu axis last year. But he got back stronger in second round and did the magic with his right punch. He surely has good punch with his right hand. However, the fight to watch is that of him and Tyson fury who is a resilient fighter. It is going to be an heavyweight cracker. I searched to see if they have had a fight in the past and what I got was a lighter fight decade ago, not professional at this stage. So this victory against Prenga is going to get him back to confidence after the incident of the accident.

Anyway, great comeback for Joshua. The man has the punch. But it seems he doesn't have the legs. I doubt he could survive Fury's weight.

Simply because it can't. Trump's executive order establishing the country's strategic Bitcoin reserve is only allowed to make use of seized coins. Directly buying Bitcoin using taxpayers' money would have to be approved by congress. And I don't think congress is inclined to support such proposal. Case in point was Senator Lummis' BITCOIN Act. It didn't get enough support. A watered-down version, the ARMA Act, is still pending, but I reckon it will suffer the same fate.

The next government can still continue accumulating the bitcoin without actively supporting it. Why I said that is because crime, money laundering, and other illegal activities will continue regardless of who is the president, and law enforcement agencies will continue seizing bitcoin and other digital assets, so basically the government will inevitably still end up holding bitcoin from criminals forfeitures.

The best approach would be to secretly buy smaller amounts of BTC every day. Anyway, Bitcoin should not be held by governments as a "strategic reserve". It should be held and used by the people.

We plan to make deposits on trusted platforms in the near future. The letter of guarantee is sent to the email address provided, and that same email needs to be entered during the exchange – you can use a temporary email or any email you like. We will not provide proof of reserves, as it would compromise anonymity, and we have already explained in the messages above that we do not store all currencies in reserve. Instead, we keep reserve funds in the currency used for conversion in order to pay out clients. We do not use liquidity providers; we simply exchange the intermediate currency on centralized exchanges such as Binance, Bybit, and others, and then pay out the client in the net currency from those exchanges. The client's transfer and the one they do not receive are completely unrelated.


We are telling you that you send us cryptocurrency from any sources, and in return you receive absolutely clean cryptocurrency from a centralized exchange. What more do you want? For us to tell you where we then put the users' cryptocurrency? That is a trade secret. If everyone knew how to do this, then such exchange services wouldn't even be needed.

And now you're increasing it to "any amount". Those are big words. The more reason your potential customers, especially those with large transactions in mind, would want to get some kind of assurance. Surely, you don't just depend on the user's deposit for his/her own payout, or do you?

How exactly does disclosing a wallet address from which you send payments amount to "all anonymity would be compromised"? That's a public address, to begin with, right? Which means it's meant to be shared, or at least known?

Since you claim to handle 'any amount,' will you provide a signed message from your cold wallet to prove you control the funds you claim to hold, or provide a third-party audit?

Since you are asking users to send funds first, can you provide a verifiable Letter of Guarantee and a cryptographic signature for the reserves you claim to hold? If not, how do you expect users to trust that the funds will be returned?

A letter of guarantee does not reveal your 'secret' process; it only confirms your ability to pay. If you cannot provide one, you are asking for blind trust.

Seems you appear to be highly evasive?

If you think that a phrase like "exchange without KYC and AML" is sufficient, then you need to learn more. Without a page of terms of use and the user's acknowledgment that he has read them before depositing, all these phrases are useless.

1- Deposit isn’t just for directory listings. We require a deposit so users can use your service smoothly without any issues. I hope your English proficiency is good enough for you to understand it.
2- Where is letter of guarantee for swaps?
3- Are you aware that many people have been scammed due to newly launched exchange services because making fake-misleading claims. Have you taken a moment to read the scam accusation thread?
4- You can also make deposits to other trusted users, it's not limited to me. As I mentioned, my difference is that, based on deposits, I allow my clients to use that service.
5- Show proof that your reserve?
6- Which liquidity provider you are using?
7- What warranty? my email address is required?

Pretty words, promises, and a "trust me bro" mentality isn't going to work in this community. I can't speak for everyone, but I am sure that 9/10 people aren't going to trust you with a dime. It's up to you to convince users here that you have what it takes. Telling us that it's none of our business how you perform the swap operations and where your liquidity comes from isn't even close to enough. What I am trying to say is you need to do better.

And now you're increasing it to "any amount". Those are big words. The more reason your potential customers, especially those with large transactions in mind, would want to get some kind of assurance. Surely, you don't just depend on the user's deposit for his/her own payout, or do you?

How exactly does disclosing a wallet address from which you send payments amount to "all anonymity would be compromised"? That's a public address, to begin with, right? Which means it's meant to be shared, or at least known?

Since you claim to handle 'any amount,' will you provide a signed message from your cold wallet to prove you control the funds you claim to hold, or provide a third-party audit?

Since you are asking users to send funds first, can you provide a verifiable Letter of Guarantee and a cryptographic signature for the reserves you claim to hold? If not, how do you expect users to trust that the funds will be returned?

A letter of guarantee does not reveal your 'secret' process; it only confirms your ability to pay. If you cannot provide one, you are asking for blind trust.

Seems you appear to be highly evasive?

If you think that a phrase like "exchange without KYC and AML" is sufficient, then you need to learn more. Without a page of terms of use and the user's acknowledgment that he has read them before depositing, all these phrases are useless.

We can exchange any amount, and this does not mean that we have to hold reserves in specific currencies; for this purpose, we hold reserve currencies which we use for conversion and payments to customers. We do not disclose our wallet addresses, as we make payments in pure cryptocurrency; if we were to disclose them, all anonymity would be compromised.



How our exchange works is a trade secret; the basic principle is simple: you send cryptocurrency from any source and receive cryptocurrency that is completely clean – in no way linked to the cryptocurrency you sent. How this happens is our business, not the customer’s.



Your email address is required solely for warranty correspondence


We can exchange any amount, and this does not mean that we have to hold reserves in specific currencies; for this purpose, we hold reserve currencies which we use for conversion and payments to customers. We do not disclose our wallet addresses, as we make payments in pure cryptocurrency; if we were to disclose them, all anonymity would be compromised.


What kind of errors are you referring to?
The website clearly states that there is no KYC/AML, and the rules are written in the simplest and most straightforward language to make it clear that there is no KYC/AML


The exchange is carried out entirely manually by an operator, as the nature of the exchange means it can only be done manually; payments are made from the exchange’s net pools, and it is technically impossible to automate this. Regarding your commercial proposal: if the administration has not yet contacted you, it means they were not interested in your proposal or will get in touch later. As for deposits, these will be made to popular platforms shortly.

As for the website you're suggesting for making a deposit, it's only been up for 12 days—how can there even be talk of a deposit on this site if it's only been around for 12 days?
https://kycnone.com/ Registered: 2026-07-12

Another day, another Russian exchange offering services all over the world but with specific business hours.

Since you're claiming to "work directly with our own wallets", you must be able to provide proof of reserve. For BTC, you can cater up to 15.68BTC. That's more than a million USD. Is it possible you can show proofs that you have indeed such capacity?

Also, since you're supporting BTC to BTC swap, could your "Transaction link breaking" feature which accordingly means "Incoming and outgoing payments come from different liquidity pools" reliably serve as a mixer?

How is that possible? If you don't keep any records and don't check the source of incoming funds, then where does all this huge amount of clean liquidity come from to pay your users?
---------------------
Also, how do you claim that your exchange is fast and secure when your system even allows swaps of the same coin? What is the actual technical process behind these swaps? Where does the swap happen, and what actually happens in the background?

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/07/23/UhkBXI.png

That’s not really true. An email address is required to complete a swap. I don’t understand the purpose of this. If we want to know the status of our transaction we can just check a block explorer. If it’s to contact customers in case a refund is necessary, it would just be easier to ask for a refund address upfront like other instant exchanges.

For being privacy focused, I would be less likely to trust somewhere that has the potential for data harvesting. Even if it is just an email address, this is a common vector used in phishing scams.

It sounds good when you read about it, but the question is how will it perform in action. If you are only working with your own reserves, would you mind signing a message proving you control the +15 BTC that is currently the maximum exchange amount? You also claim to possess 558 ETH, 1 mil USDT per network, etc. Pretty bold claims.

Btw, you should fix the link in OP. This https://shadowswap.top/en/ takes us to an empty FAQ page. https://shadowswap.top/en goes to the homepage.

The name of the service and the description of the service are impressive, but when we visit the domain we find that it is a duplicate script with many errors and missing pages.

- There is no page explaining the terms of service or that no KYC is guaranteed.
- There is no guarantee that you have a reserve of 15 Bitcoin.

https://shadowswap.top/en/order/29543366


Is the process manually execute?

Where is letter of guarantee for swaps?

I asked about security deposits a few days ago, and you replied.

"If the administrator is interested, they will get in touch with you."

are you aware that many people have been scammed due to newly launched exchange services because making fake-misleading claims.

Details are still pending so there is some room for speculation and we will see exactly in practice what it is, but from what it seems now this is more like a low-latency news feed, which is not a new concept. This is common in financial markets where entities pay for speed...

Loans can only be good if the money is used for something productive. Unfortunately here in my country, most are taking loans for the sake of things that aren't really important. And, as you've observed, it's driven by easy access.

Here in my country, mobile banking can be accessed by anybody who has a phone. There are several mobile banking apps here, all of which offer users the opportunity to borrow money.

But not only this, lending businesses have also grown in numbers. So, even those who don't have phones could easily buy stuff they can't otherwise afford. Young students could easily buy a trending expensive pair of sneakers even if they don't have the money because of these lending companies.

Yes, a lot. The problem, however, is that the community is far from being a solid group of like-minded individuals. On the contrary, I'd even say the majority are superficial supporters. In other words, not really supporters of Bitcoin in the strict sense, but simply people who have heard of an internet money that accordingly grows in dollar price quite fast.

Honestly, if I had a hundred dollars or two in Bitcoin, I guess I won't be buying a storage device for it.

If I had extra dollars which could afford me a hardware wallet, I might just decide to buy Sats with it and make my portfolio a bit bigger. That sounds more worth it.

Hot wallets like Electrum or Bluewallet are fine with me for Bitcoin worth a few hundred dollars.

Although I don't join often, I remember joining a free raffle by the old blackjack.fun. Strictly speaking, it wasn't actually a raffle. I think it was a prediction contest. Regardless, I won. So, yeah, the prize was credited to my blackjack.fun account.

I'm not sure if there was any wagering requirement before I could withdraw it. There's probably none. But I didn't withdraw it right away. I used the money to bet on their classic blackjack. I think I managed to grow it, was even able to withdraw a portion, and left some for more blackjack games.

I agree. btcoin's security comes from its cryptography and decentralized design which is safe eversince not with the help of AI. This AI can only help our developers  to review codes or spot the potential bugs and issues, but any changes still require careful community review to avoid any further problems... The bigger risk is AI making scams like phishing and fake websites more convincing... So following basic security practices, such as verifying links and keeping your recovery phrase offline remains the best protection for everyone.

From a layman's point of view, it seems AI isn't making Bitcoin safer. Bitcoin itself is safe now, and it's not because of AI but because of its design. However, I'm clueless as to how much contribution AI makes in the proposals of Bitcoin developers for its continuous upgrade.  

On the other hand, I don't think AI poses any danger to Bitcoin currently. AI-generated fake websites, phishing emails, deepfake videos, and all aren't threats to Bitcoin itself. They're threats to coin owners, though. But I believe the basics in terms of protecting one's Sats remain effective to this day regardless of the advance of AI. The classic dos and don'ts such as not clicking on unverified links or not keeping wallet backups online remain solid protections against such threats.

It seems gamblers can easily fall for fallacies because they badly want to win. Anything that makes their odds a little better, whether true or false, is worth believing or trying.

I'm from a country where gambling is somehow cultural. I can easily observe how fallacies and superstitions turn into something serious because of their strong desire to go home profitable. The main argument it seems is that "there's no harm in trying". For example, they'd lose nothing if they put their lottery ticket inside the pages of the bible or underneath a statue of a saint.

It seems gamblers can easily fall for fallacies because they badly want to win. Anything that makes their odds a little better, whether true or false, is worth believing or trying.

I'm from a country where gambling is somehow cultural. I can easily observe how fallacies and superstitions turn into something serious because of their strong desire to go home profitable. The main argument it seems is that "there's no harm in trying". For example, they'd lose nothing if they put their lottery ticket inside the pages of the bible or underneath a statue of a saint.

Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency. And, yeah, as you've put it, "just like everything else". However, the quoted phrase is exactly the reason why some won't call Bitcoin a cryptocurrency. There's danger in lumping Bitcoin together with the rest.

While cryptocurrency is divided between Bitcoin and altcoins, to casually group them together as if they're the same is to seemingly disregard the world of differences--serious, fundamental, core--between Bitcoin and altcoins. To a great extent, it's risky and misleading to find Bitcoin on a list which includes Fartcoin, Trump Coin, Boobcoin, and countless others.