This is also one of those things that I don’t want to get normalized. Seeing a lot of gambling ads will not only harm us but most particularly those who are still minors and have still unclear knowledge about gambling. Instead of educating them on how to avoid gambling, or controlling their gambling urges, they would even resort into thinking that gambling is widely accepted so there’s no wrong even if you maximize gambling in your whole life.

Gambling is becoming unstoppable right now, and this gambling ads will eventually make it worst. So at least we should be more responsible and practice proper thinking when it comes to gambling.

He does not. If you would sell because Satoshi said or did something after a decade, you have joined Bitcoin for the wrong reason. You never cared or believed in its ideals. It is as simple as that. 

Thank you for your inquiry and feedback.

If you haveany doubts before making an exchange for a large amount, you can always place
test orders for smaller amounts. We guarantee that every order will beprocessed as quickly as possible, regardless of its size. For additional
security, we recommend sending the address for verification in advance — thiswill completely eliminate any potential delays.

Regarding contacting our website chat: entering a phone number is not required.
We strive to be as customer-oriented as possible, so we have removed themention of needing to provide a mobile number in order to avoid
misunderstandings.

Thank you for helpingus get better!

Best regards,
The CryptoZeus Team.

Satoshi Nakamoto did not create Bitcoin to become an influencer, he simply did what he is good at and he found happiness from his works. His big decision for Bitcoin project and Bitcoin community, leaving the community many years ago and has never returned until now, was not made by any reason of becoming an influencer.

It's hilarious that he did not chase influence but his influence in Bitcoin project, the community, the market and even at wider scale around the world, will stay forever.

No he does not have that kind of influence anymore. If such a comment came by "Satoshi" most would doubt his identity and reject the comment. You think of this in foolish way. Even assuming it were the real satoshi, it could be easily possible that he's compromised or that he has a mental disease. In those cases, any comments can be dismissed. Bitcoin is not about trusting in authorities. This is not a shitcoin like Ethereum.

Satoshi has a great influence in the Bitcoin space. A single negative comment by Satoshi about Bitcoin will be a big blow to the market. Apart from the coin he holds, his personality is dominant.

In the first place, ^BTCStrategy and BlackRock don't own their companies' Bitcoin. Unlike Satoshi, they don't have complete power and control over those assets. On the other hand, Satoshi could freely decide to dump everything at once.
[/quote]
Indeed, these institutions don't own the Bitcoin they hold. But the management of Strategy and BlackRock has great influence over these investors. Saylor's actions or inactions can make investors in his company sell off.   

The government would have to give these miners time to switch to solar. In some countries, solar batteries could be charged so that they could work around the clock. But it will be very expensive.


The government can make such laws when power generation is less than the demand in a country.  A few years ago, Kazakhstan had to reduce electric supply to miners because it was believed that they were the cause of power outages in the city of Almaty. The government can decide to cut miners out of the power grid because of other important sectors.

Most likely, mining Bitcoin will become more difficult, and not everyone will be able to do it. This right will mainly belong to large organizations, since small miners simply won’t have the ability to create the necessary conditions for mining. And even more likely, the price of bitcoin will rise significantly.

If Thurman comes into this fight in good condition, I think he can win because he’s a smart boxer. Fundora may have beaten Tszyu, but in that fight Tszyu didn’t really make the right adjustments, which shows he doesn’t have the same ring IQ. Thurman on the other hand only lost to Pacquiao, and that was a pretty controversial one in my opinion.

I don’t care if he’s older, age is just a number, and Pacquiao already proved that in his fight against Barrios, and even though it ended in a draw, it was still a great fight.

Simply put, the forum is open for everyone but there are always strict rules and regulations to follow. And if you think you can’t do them, everyone is free to move out. There is always freedom in the forum, but what is highly valued is our freedom to speak and let other people hear your personal and valid views on certain topics or threads that are related about bitcoin and the crypto market.

Welcome to the forum. But just a friendly advice, don’t jump into posting. Study first, and make the most of it reading and exploring the whole concept of the forum. Acquire knowledge first, because posting requires if not experience, at least you should have stocked knowledge and values to make the forum more interesting.

Great job
Your writings are the bitter truth which just have to be said and yes op the forum isn’t open to everyone especially for those who have any negative intentions and thoughts for joining.
Adding to what Darker45 has already said, I think there is a proxyban on some countries in here and this is to help cum the rate of illegal or criminal (scams and scammers) on the forum.

But on the other hand, the forum is open to everyone who wants to learn and explore the world of digital assets, hence if you’re typically here to learn about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general then you’re highly welcome.

I didn’t check through your profile and I didn’t notice your country but I would advise that you try to identify with your local board(country), so it will be more easier to assist you and teach you more better how to best navigate the forum.

Welcome.

No, that statement does not apply to this forum, which is open to anyone. The analogy remains the same: it is open to anyone, but the forum has rules and regulations for users. Anyone who enters here is allowed to do so, but they must follow the rules. There is no intimidation based on race, ethnicity, culture, nationality, or other backgrounds.

Regarding Mixer, it is only prohibited from being promoted on the forum. If we discuss it for the purpose of gaining knowledge, it is still permitted, provided it aligns with the prohibition statement, but it must not be associated with a specific project. If I recall correctly, and again, Mixer is not an individual.

As long as people can adhere to the existing forum rules, feel free to join and explore the forum.

In my country, a few decades ago, there was exactly the same situation. There was nothing. Not even TVs. Time to read books and other literature. People are much smarter than the current generation, which is not able to cope with basic things and everyday affairs. You look at these zoomers and you become afraid for future generations. What will they get? Well, it's all complicated. If we do not move to a new level of development, it will be very difficult for our descendants.

The primary driver would be of course profit by short selling Bitcoin and the stocks of these companies. Not "just to bring them down". Just to clarify. Basically how short squeezes work, but the opposite. Or take Michael Burry, the guy who predicted the 2007/2008 financial crash since 2005 or so and made fortunes with his small hedge fond.

Of course there has to be a weakness in the business model, and a chance to exploit it, i.e. when some of these stocks lose demand. I personally am not too convinced of their business model being sustainable forever. But I don't expect neither a crash being 100% sure for the next 25 years or so (I think 50/50) neither do I expect the crash to happen in the next bear already, but there is a small possibility.

I agree. Even if Saylor falls this would not be the death of Bitcoin. But my dreams of a volatility reduction would have to wait then a few years more

And imo if some thought is too "prevailing" or popular this could generate a certain risk: if contrarian traders (think those who dumped Terra/Luna and BTC when they were aware of the vulnerabilities of their algorithm) see a chance to bring one of the treasury companies into problems, then this could generate such a "huge name dump" via a chain reaction. I consider this relatively unlikely but not impossible: say they attack the weakest of the treasury companies while also shorting BTC, and then distributing the narrative that "Bitcoin Treasuries don't work", bringing also bigger treasury companies into problems (maybe not Saylor but the second tier).

Volatility "disappearing" is also not what I expect. And yes, the "riding the waves" pattern, be it short terme spikes or our beloved 4-year-cycle, is still prevailing among Bitcoin traders I think. But I expect that the ups and downs could become simply less extreme if there is less potential to panic because you fear to "lose everything" when "Bitcoin goes to zero".

But still with 50% of the current volatility there would be enough profit to be made with trading.

BTC has a cap of trillion sizes - what millions are to it, if we are talking only about buys and sells?

So I totally agree with you.

Those who are long enough in the space will just sway his words off, as it should be done in case he would FUD BTC all the way.

These sorts of people will never admit they are wrong in anything and even though the caption makes it's look like he's made a U-turn from his earlier stance, what you just said says different.
There are lots of individuals like him and I'm sure that there would still be those who would value his inputs and assertions concerning Bitcoin so it's really not a shocker to me.

People like that are too stubborn to admit their mistakes, unfortunately..And it's highly unlikely that would change in the future