Last update: 2026-06-22_Mon_13.36h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Darker45 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Darker45
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Darker45" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66863553 (unedited backup) (by Fivestar4everMVP) (scraped on Mon Jun 22 13:33:55 CEST 2026) in Bettors: the Cash Cow for authorities & Investors in the industry:
Here in my country, there's a lot of smart play involved in the gambling industry, whether legal or illegal. On the side of the legal, there's the huge taxes. On the side of the illegal, there's protection money and a significant share of the revenue.
But it seems to me law enforcers and regulators are helpless when it comes to huge resort casinos that are owned by the richest elites. They can't just watch their day-to-day operation and wait for them to commit a single mistake before meting out big fines. No, the powerful elites here are untouchable.
It is the same almost in every country of the world except for the few countries that have managed to deal and win the war against corruption a bit..
It seems to me that laws and taxes are only for the poor and vulnerable in the country and society, the rich and the elite can choose to disobey, those in politics can even steal taxpayers money and law enforcement agencies can't do anything about except for the few that for one reason or the other lost their protection and immunity from whoever their godfather is it were.
So, in terms of running a casino or any other business, people In the above class can run a business like this not minding whether it's legal or illegal and regulators will be completely helpless, doest matter how the treat gamblers or bettors who use the site, so the casino users, it's best to avoid such casinos except it's a non kyc casino where every other casinos are kyc, then this means you are ready to bear whatever comes.
2. Post 66860326 (unedited backup) (by jvanname) (scraped on Sun Jun 21 16:01:32 CEST 2026) in What makes you think a Bitcoin site might be a scam?:
It's reviews and reputation for me more than the domain name. Some just want to be creative, innovative, even funny with their domains. Also, age matters more than the name, not to mention that the longer the site has been operating, the more reviews, feedbacks, stories, comments you could find about it online that you could peruse.
Perhaps the only exception is when I send Sats to try a new, unknown, and unproven gambling platform. But the condition is that it's being promoted here with escrowed payment. That's not a guarantee that it isn't a scam, but it makes a small amount worth risking.
Reputation itself is a scam. I just assume everyone is a moron unless they can sign their statements with a digital signature using a cryptocurrency with a mining algorithm that was designed to advance science.
3. Post 66854553 (unedited backup) (by lionheart78) (scraped on Fri Jun 19 22:03:55 CEST 2026) in Spence vs Tszyu in Australia - July 26:
Although Spence is the favorite here, I'm thinking, with all other factors considered, that Tim could be worth the risk. Errol is old, hasn't been in the ring for 3 years, but rarely had fights in the past 5 years actually. And I remembered how he looked so easy against Crawford in his last fight despite the hype that the match was between 2 of the best fighters.
Tim isn't coming from a devastating defeat. I think he's recovered well after defeating Velazquez and Nurja. Spence, on the other hand, is. And it was a humiliating TKO. This must add to his ring rust. I hope he's in perfect shape, though.
Ring rust can be fixed by training, but the question is whether Spence has seen his shortcomings from his previous fight. We see that Spence got hit whenever he became aggressive against Crawford, which is a lack of defense during an aggressive move. If Spence had fixed that, he might have had a higher possibility of winning this match, but Tszyu, being naturally bigger, might put Spence in a very difficult situation.
4. Post 66849258 (unedited backup) (by acroman08) (scraped on Thu Jun 18 13:52:01 CEST 2026) in [NEWS]Kentucky Sues Prediction Markets for Illegal Gambling.:
I wonder why Polymarket and Kalshi are still insisting that what they're offering isn't gambling. For me, it's not rocket science. It's gambling through and through. What they consider shares are just bets. What they consider trade is just another way of labeling cash-out.
Why don't both of these platforms not obtain gambling licenses when they could easily do it? It saves them all the hassles and the legal cases and costs and all the confusions that actually prevent them from going full swing without reservations.
Because, in their point of view, they aren't providing gambling services, and if they did get a gambling license to get those states off of their back, it means that they are admitting that they are a gambling platform and would need to acquire a gambling license in order to operate in the country and follow gambling regulations. It would also heavily restrict their operation, which is what they are trying so hard to avoid, that's why they are insisting that they are not a gambling platform and not offering gambling services.
5. Post 66848018 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Thu Jun 18 01:38:43 CEST 2026) in A quick note on my recent P2P trading experience:
Supposing you stumbled on it somewhere, why did you choose a service that's pretty much unheard of over other options that aren't unknown and have long track records, say, RoboSats?
No doubts that he is part of the team or someone paid to shill the platform. In both cases, he is a liar who should never be trusted, and his forum profile deserves a natural tag to alert others about the potential scam attempt. Despite being an old bitcointalk user, I have never encountered marketing groups or agencies that explicitly advertise their bitcointalk shilling services elsewhere on the internet. This is why I think this account belongs to the scam team itself that was just created to shill the service.
6. Post 66847880 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Thu Jun 18 00:43:50 CEST 2026) in A quick note on my recent P2P trading experience:
Supposing you're not a shill, it's a curious case how you ended up using a service that's less than a week old, one that's not aggressively promoted or even visible on popular social media platforms. Even their social media links aren't working. You can't even check reviews on them anywhere.
Supposing you stumbled on it somewhere, why did you choose a service that's pretty much unheard of over other options that aren't unknown and have long track records, say, RoboSats?
and look at this:
https://cryptosnearby.com/?trader=user_080how can there be someone who is a member since March, when the platform is 7 days old, lol.
and of course with 146 completed trades with 5 star reviews.
but on the same page it's showing "no reviews yet":
i guess OP forgot to say "make no mistakes" at the end of his prompts when he was vibe coding the site
7. Post 66847218 (unedited backup) (by amagra11) (scraped on Wed Jun 17 21:14:14 CEST 2026) in On Bots, And Their Effects On The Markets:
It's easy to conclude from your premise that the movements would eventually grow more and more predictable. Would it turn me into a trader? I don't think so.
In reality, it's easier said than done. If the US bombs Iran tomorrow, the immediate expectation is that the market would go down. Will it? By how much? Until when? If Russia and Ukraine agree to stop the war in Europe, the assumption is that the market would rise. Will it?
In the end, timing the market isn't easy despite general observations that Bitcoin follows macro-economic trends, that it correlates with tech stocks, that it reacts this way and that to changes in interest rates, and so on and so forth.
Trading remains hard and, I believe, most often not profitable, whereas hodling is almost a guarantee that you'd be rewarded in the end.
That's probably true about what's happening in the news. But I think the charts themselves are more likely to follow the patterns traders already think they do, because some bots will trade just from the charts, not from world events, causing the very patterns they expect. The bots expect the crypto to rise based on the chart, so they buy in, so it rises. The bots expect a crypto to fall based on the chart, they sell, so it falls. In that way, the charts will grow more predictable. But you have a point--it's hard to predict what cryptos and even stocks will do based on real-world events. The thing is, some bots ignore world events completely, and just look at the charts, and it's those bots that will expect and cause more "predictable" outcomes in the charts.