Last update: 2026-08-11_Tue_02.30h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Darker45 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Darker45
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Darker45" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67031823 (unedited backup) (by Hispo) (scraped on Tue Aug 11 02:27:31 CEST 2026) in How Profitable Are Casino Affiliate Sites?:
Very profitable if we keep in mind how online gambling has grown in recent years and how cryptocurrency has become a major player on casinos and bookies nowadays.
As the number of gamblers increases, so does the profitability margin of those affiliate websites.
While it is true AI is taking a good slice of the pie from affiliate websites, there are still room for competition and growth.
There is a good reason why there are so many people here on the forum and outside of it seeking to create their own affiliate website and get enough traffic to get hundreds or thousands of dollars per month. It is a good business.
Can be "very profitable".
Can be "a good business". But profitability won't be served to you on a silver platter, except perhaps if you're not entirely starting from scratch.
If you're already popular, a celebrity of some kind, or a trusted gambling critic, for example, your affiliate site could easily get visitors and even translate those visitors into players and deposits.
But if you're starting from step 1, it will certainly be challenging, and could end up not profitable at all. It would help if you have the money to spend on SEO specialists, ads, and the like.
I mean, success is never guaranteed in the world of business, not matter which kind of business we talk about. The fact there are so many affiliate websites on the internet, it means there is much competition and only those who offer the best information and ranking on casinos will eventually stay in business and attract enough clicks from potential gamblers.
Obviously, this ecosystem is made for the best ones to succeed, and the mecriodre businesses will eventually left behind if they don't adapt. That is how a healthy market works.
2. Post 67031081 (unedited backup) (by Rgram) (scraped on Mon Aug 10 22:03:19 CEST 2026) in Sorry everyone, Bitcoin is headed down to $43,500: Michael Terpin:
If it's only the Coldcard issue that's bugging the market, I don't think the price will fall below $50,000. It may be a fundamental issue that shakes a significant number of solid supporters and hodlers to the core, but I don't think that's enough to affect the price to the extremes.
I don’t really consider that news enough to cause a significant change in the market direction of Bitcoin. At most, we can find people move coins between wallets while preparing a more safe means that they would be confident in and not necessarily having to liquidate their asset. It was a wallet issue and not really a problem of Bitcoin.
When I read the OP, I had to check the charts real quick and price at the time of writing is around $63.9k that’s actually stable, considering how the market has faired between last month and now.
3. Post 67030087 (unedited backup) (by MarryWithBTC) (scraped on Mon Aug 10 17:05:49 CEST 2026) in StormRate.io — Next-Generation Crypto Exchange:
It's funny how confident resellers are in claiming a lot of things when in fact they only have minimal control.
Me: I have an exchange, write me a sales promotion post to market my reseller exchange
Chatgpt: Since it is a reseller exchange, it will be right to mention the main project that performs the transaction.
Me: No, pass it like I own everything.
Chatgpt: Say no more...
That's why it says 'Next-Generation' in their name.
I was curious to see what this was all about and what features this exchange brings, the reality being that it's just another reseller trying to come up with a powerful name.
Me: Suggest me a powerful name/slogan for my exchange that will make people patronize me.
Chatgpt: Say no more...
4. Post 67029028 (unedited backup) (by Zaguru12) (scraped on Mon Aug 10 10:55:55 CEST 2026) in Some questions about dust transactions:
I think this is heavily dependent on if one of those addresses have actually been linked with any KYC platform because if none of the addresses hasn’t been linked with any of the platforms then it’s only your privacy that will actually be affected as all the addresses containing those UTXO will be associated to one entity because of the consolidation but you yourself you will remain anonymous since your personal details are hidden.
Not necessarily. Even if those addresses that are confirmed to be yours aren't linked with any platform that requires KYC, it could still be highly possible that your identity is known.
This forum, for example, is non-KYC, but some accounts here could be traced to actual persons. The same is true with social media platforms. Facebook, for example, doesn't require mandatory KYC to each and every user, but once an address is linked to a Facebook account, it becomes so much easier to find out who owns it.
We are still saying the same thing here, your address must be connected to something, you perfectly mentioned social media and it’s actually a platform too where you leave your footprints that can get linked to you. Like addresses on social media, profile picture and many more on your bio which exposes you, this is not actually different from a KYC platform because the exception is a government ID that the exchanges requires as more than the social media.
Even on this forum you can remain anonymous until you reveal certain details that exposes you identity and it’s what I was actually pointing at, if you have an address already associated with your social media accounts and you consolidate UTXO that includes this addresses then it signals that it’s yours
5. Post 67028232 (unedited backup) (by Hazink) (scraped on Mon Aug 10 01:00:01 CEST 2026) in Obvious Game Fixing on Philippines MPBL Basketball League:
Here comes another case of game fixing. I'm worried of the possible repercussions. As I'm afraid no investigation and subsequent decisions are perfect, there might be innocent players whose name will be dragged together with the dirty ones.
This is about someone's career here, so I don't think they can just give out punishment to random players, including the ones who are fully involved in the game-fixing. They will need to conduct a serious investigation before they can confirm and punish only those who commit the crime, unless the entire team somehow indirectly participated.
6. Post 67028211 (unedited backup) (by Japinat) (scraped on Mon Aug 10 00:54:25 CEST 2026) in perception of Bitcoin in mainstream-discussions and -media:
Your perception and mine are practically the same.
But perhaps we differ in our reactions. I don't even care to ask "how to make a change?" It seems to me it's enough that Bitcoin is there on the sidelines waiting for anybody to finally mature and realize there's something terribly wrong with the system and they need a way out.
For me it's best for Bitcoin supporters to be passive. They could switch into active mode once somebody comes and asks questions. Outside of it, the change that we think is necessary might even sound ridiculous to somebody else, and so it's better not to kind of indoctrinate them or impose our own philosophies on them however logical they may seem.
And no matter how we try to stick with bitcoin logic, people will always have their final say so I think let's not pour too much effort on that. People will appreciate bitcoin when its time to, just like those bitcoin critics that are now supporting bitcoin that best way they can.
We should learn to accept the fact that we all have different philosophies with bitcoin, theirs are not wrong, they just see bitcoin the other way around.
7. Post 67026549 (unedited backup) (by Zaguru12) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 15:33:43 CEST 2026) in Some questions about dust transactions:
It could possibly link your identity because once you send those dust amounts together with your other UTXOs, your other addresses or main wallet might be uncovered. Once they're known, it's possible they could link one or two of them to a name or address or phone number or email or an account here. That's where they could start their next move. You could be subjected to phishing attacks, for example.
I think this is heavily dependent on if one of those addresses have actually been linked with any KYC platform because if none of the addresses hasn’t been linked with any of the platforms then it’s only your privacy that will actually be affected as all the addresses containing those UTXO will be associated to one entity because of the consolidation but you yourself you will remain anonymous since your personal details are hidden.
Then the only way again you reveal more of your identity is through the nodes you connect to, if your IP isn’t hidden the node will connect those addresses together and eventually finds out that it’s coming from the owner of that IP address
8. Post 67026025 (unedited backup) (by angrybirdy) (scraped on Sun Aug 9 11:25:55 CEST 2026) in How Profitable Are Casino Affiliate Sites?:
I think there's no single answer to the question of profitability. It's basically a game of traffic. While popular sites could attract thousands of visitors daily, an unknown one that failed to climb through the search ranks could only get a few hundreds or even tens within a month. And it's even possible that out of those few visitors, no one would sign up using your link. And if there are they aren't the high roller type that could provide you a stable revenue share.
So, I guess it's all a matter of establishing reputation of your affiliate site.
Yasss, you have a point. Traffic is probably the biggest factor but i think it is not just about getting a lot of visitors. the quality of that traffic matters the most. a smaller site with the right audiences can sometimes gain more profit and do better than a bigger site but most visitors aren’t interested in signing up...you have to build a trust and getting consistent in what you need to do even though it takes time. Once the site has an outstanding reputation and starts ranking for the right keywords, the affiliate side becomes a lot more worthy... I think that it is mostly about building the site and audiences than expecting higher revenue at the beginning.
9. Post 67023663 (unedited backup) (by arwin100) (scraped on Sat Aug 8 16:18:31 CEST 2026) in Events made you scare about custodial wallets, centralized exchanges.:
Exchanges or ETF providers do indeed benefit from this, as they appear to be a safe haven for holders to store their assets since they have the liquidity and regulatory framework to compensate users if their platforms are hacked. However, this is misleading, as self-custody remains the best and safest option for holding.. while it won't provide any compensation if you lose your assets, you can at least add a passphrase and multi-signature to prevent your assets from being compromised.
Let me play the devil's advocate here. You're not putting forward any argument.
If it's misleading for exchanges to claim to be a safe haven for hodlers despite their liquidity, regulatory compliance, and ability to compensate customers if the platform's hacked, why?
And isn't it also misleading to generalize that self-custody is the "best and safest option" for hodling when somebody who's keeping his funds on a hardware wallet has lost them while another hodling his on YoBit still has it?
I think there's some confusion towards your answer in his statement, because maybe you are confused with the bolded text he mentioned.
But try to proceed reading because he also said that self custody is the best, which I also agree because. We cannot rely those exchange the safety of out funds, since they are most riskier place or platform to store our wallet.
So yeah hardware wallet is the best if we compare on the exchange you use as example or maybe any other one even if we say they are big or successful now.
10. Post 67019738 (unedited backup) (by Iranus) (scraped on Fri Aug 7 11:03:37 CEST 2026) in Sorry everyone, Bitcoin is headed down to $43,500: Michael Terpin:
If it's only the Coldcard issue that's bugging the market, I don't think the price will fall below $50,000. It may be a fundamental issue that shakes a significant number of solid supporters and hodlers to the core, but I don't think that's enough to affect the price to the extremes.
If it's just part of the bear market or the 4-year cycle, the more reason I don't think Bitcoin could go as low as $43,000 as Terpin predicted.
I think the market needs a bigger reason for it to shed more than 30% further, possibly hitting the bottom in October to November, which is just 2-3 months from now.
In reality, not that many people use Coldcard or even noncustodial wallet. I agree that this is not a big enough issue to shake the market or cause a serious Bitcoin sell off.
Regarding bear market, Bitcoin is currently down around 48-50% from its ATH, which is a relatively modest drop compared to previous cycle. So if history repeats itself, it could still drop below $50k.
Lastly, sometime Bitcoin does not need a specific reason to go down. Just look at what happened in late 2025 and early 2026. Bitcoin reached $126k and then quickly fell to $60k, without any major event causing the drop.
11. Post 67017122 (unedited backup) (by Son Of Blockchain (SOB)) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 15:31:13 CEST 2026) in Possible all Bitcoin Hardware Wallets be hacked due to 'Trust in Device Entropy?:
To a great extent, I'm with you. But did Satoshi really say Bitcoin is for everyone? It made me remember the "I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry" statement.
"For everyone" is equivocal. In a sense, Bitcoin is for everyone because everybody's welcome to take advantage of it. In another sense, it isn't because even the slogan 'don't trust, verify' is obviously exclusive to those few who are capable.
If a Bitcoin layman like me buys a hardware wallet, there's no way I can verify the true random ability of the generator the hardware company is using, the true randomness of the words generated, and so on. Moreover, there's no way I can verify that the chip used inside the device can be trusted. Software updates, firmware updates, and the like are also things beyond my capacity to scrutinize detail by detail. In the end, I usually rely on so-called experts. Some of them recommended Coldcard.
The fact that everyone can do whatever they want with Bitcoin is the reason why some chose to do illegals with it by stealing from others, well it's not Satoshi's fault, that's not the reason for creating Bitcoin, his intentions was for a good cause but some decided to use it as a tool for crime, that's why some feel it supports criminals activities but "you don't blame the gun but the man behind the gun" and anyone that's not truely convinced about it should go for other options they feel is better.
For someone to verify a hardware before using, cryptography is supposed to be understood by the person to a great extent so it could be audited properly but those who ain't capable of doing that should just go for extra security with an open source wallet that's non custodial and can be strengthened with passphrase.
12. Post 67016222 (unedited backup) (by OsaiEmma) (scraped on Thu Aug 6 08:46:55 CEST 2026) in perception of Bitcoin in mainstream-discussions and -media:
It seems to me it's enough that Bitcoin is there on the sidelines waiting for anybody to finally mature and realize there's something terribly wrong with the system and they need a way out.
Speaking strictly from my own experience, a lot of people (those around me) have already figured out the system is messed up, but the issue is on how to actually escape through Bitcoin. Bitcoin can't provide you your daily or monthly income, you basic and secondary needs, you have to be under the system to get that (speaking for someone who recently wants to get into Bitcoin); the only ones who can live comfortably with Bitcoin are the OG's those that have started accumulating or mining for up to or more than a decade ago, and they even need to be within the confines of the system to do that.
So I don't think there is any escaping the system with Bitcoin, you just have to exist with it while reducing its impact and effect with Bitcoin. Bitcoin is more like a shield than an escape.
/begin discussion of: is my perception way off?
- if yes, what's yours?
- if no, what could be the reasons and how to make a change? is just another decade needed? that's what I though about 7 years ago... now I'm not so sure anymore.[/b]
Well, from my POV, it's way off

On a more serious note, those around me really do want to invest in Bitcoin, but they do have the issue of patience and capital. If I tell an average earner to invest in Bitcoin, after explaining it all, the mechanism, the potential etc, there response will be to hold on until they've made enough capital to invest. Meanwhile, the well to do are already pouring in a lot into it, at this point it seems the rich are just getting richer.
13. Post 67009267 (unedited backup) (by DabsPoorVersion) (scraped on Tue Aug 4 06:01:55 CEST 2026) in How the economies of nations, has turned the youths to be useless.:
This is true. However, this shouldn't define the kind of life of any youth. I'm living in a developing country myself. My government is incompetent. My country's economy is in shambles. My leaders are nincompoops as they are callous. My culture is rotten and stuck in the old ages.
Regardless, any youth with a sound mind and strong ambition should try as best as he/she can to transcend all these limitations and create his/her own destiny.
That would be very hard. That would be easier said than done. From where I am, the majority of the youth are underdogs in life. They have to beat all odds to achieve something. But it's always a test of character. If they prove wanting, they'll be sorry victims of systems and structures and institutions that are beyond his/her control.
That sounds so inspiring that any ambitious youth should try to transcend a broken system and create his/her own destiny. I know it's harsh to say but, there's no individual talent can overcome a deeply flawed system, and a corrupt leadership resulting to a collapsing economy. Especially if there's a limited or inaccessibility for education, healthcare, and jobs, even if the person is determined will be constrained by these forces which is far beyond their control.
In this kind of situation, it will be hard for the youths to pave their own path. Unless they focus on having a small but powerful circles. They can use their personal growth to collective progress, by using each and every step forward to strengthen each other. This includes having to provide mentorship and where they can exchange resources. I know this might not immediately fix the broken system, but it means that progress is no longer defined by what the government allows. The youths can slowly build alternate routes through shared effort.