Lol, exactly my thoughts too, side bets are finished math that needed no strategy, it's already against the gambler, I don't know why people don't see things this way, something was already designed to put you in an unfair place and you think you are going to fight your way out, it's not you on the ring throwing hands where you can outperform, the system is already against the gamblers and it's why I don't think about making some money via gambling.

Everything is set out that way for a reason, it's never a mistake. You are the target, it was made so you can chose to fall into what clearly seems to be a trap or move on to something smaller. Some can't ignore that big payout, what exactly are they on it for? Their faith strongly holds a belief that there's always a possibility to win, just like when you decide to wager on bigger odds on virtual games, but how?

Yep and actually bybit had made important notice regarding enforcement of the sanction back in 27 may 2026 as it turns out https://x.com/Bybit_Official/status/2059578789613699478, using this as a precedent, they'll likely to enforce platform wide screening to the deposit that are connected to the 17 platforms above as well if anyone ever made one.

The supervising of MiCA authorization is also happening on an ongoing basis, the EU has made a good example of KuCoin by prohibiting it from fully operating because the exchange let thefew roles required by MiCA were left empty.

Really? I've seen a few stories like these about the Philippines. In every country, there are problematic gambling behaviors, but the percentage of people who fall into them is low. That said, those who do can ruin their lives very quickly. I don't know what specifically happens in the Philippines to make it worse there. I suppose it has to do with a combination of limited financial resources and a lack of financial knowledge.

I agree verily with you because I've had similar experiences where the dealer seems to reshuffle the dashboard of the game like it's refreshed to reload system for fairness outcome.
I've always believed that the dealer does that to clean any form of skepticism that players may feel cheated with the certain ball. Th dealer too may not trust you fully so he'd interwove it to convince both sides but it's always like the dealer knows all he's doing that's why we can't beat the house edge.

Agreed.

However, I believe they are both trading and gambling at the same time considering what kind of contract they are offering which is the main goal is to gamble on sports.

It’s a gray area for now when it comes to classification but I’m later on they will be required to seek gambling license just like sportsbook since they are almost with the same category. 

How many people will spend money on a $500 toothbrush? The brush is just a mouth camera with a sensor and rinsers. Those who buy it might also have their dental data given out.

Robots don't have feelings or emotions, and many jobs require this feature. Patients will always want to be attended to by human nurses. People will always prefer to interact with humans and not robots.

I think more jobs will be lost than the ones AI will create.

They brought back the human engineers due to poor performance of these AI tools. However, they were also rehired to train the AI agents.

You are mistaken. Machine learning diagnosis was already better than most doctors and that was many years ago. So if the machine can do better diagnosis and better suggestion of medicine and treatments than doctors, why would we need the doctor? Machines or AI do not need to be perfect, they just need to be better than humans and we are going fast into that direction. Nobody can say when exactly this is going to be, but any kind of denial of this process is just wrong. Those jobs are not hard at all to replace correctly.

You are mistaking AI-enabled tools from the current generations with actual AI and robots. An AI tool such as an AI toothbrush will not replace a dentist, but a robot that does dentistry better than most dentist will. Once we have robots that are skilled like that we are going to see emerge new business models of how services are provided, but in those cases there will be almost no new jobs created it will only be about replacing jobs.

That is how they are going to do it in the last stage of this, robots fixing and making more robots. As these technologies advance I do not see a need for most humans in that production process, it will be mostly just the owners and some managers that own the whole operation. But this kind of future is dangerous and we need to see how we can change the current way of life into a compatible way so that humans don't suffer, but instead thrive.

All this leverage Polymarket could take advantage of, unfortunately to them, has an expiration date. The day Trump is removed from the presidency and a democrat government is moved in to replace him.
After a democrat administration is in, then the power balance of Trump family will be broken and they will have to use their money the best way they can in order to face a Democrat government, which would be very difficult.

That is why this incoming midterm elections are so important, they serve as a thermometer in order to see who bad Trump and Republicans are doing in the eyes of the common people of the United States.

I don't know which input everyone is talking about if i know correctly every unspent UTXO become input when it's send to another address. If two UTXO is being used it become two input once those UTXOs send using single transection it become 1 output.

In OPs case it's two input and two output which mean transection fee would be even higher because more input and output equal more vbytes and more vbytes mean higher transection fee.

Why do you mean by "there's actually no such thing as input in the Bitcoin blockchain"?
Every non-coinbase bitcoin transaction has inputs, and even Satoshi has used the word "input" in Bitcoin whitepaper.