Since Moneytree.games is no longer accessible, there is no way to check how similar the two platforms really are and nobody really knows why it went down or if it's gone for good. Having a similar UI to a casino that already closed is enough reason for people to ask questions. That does not mean Lucky.fun is doing something wrong, but people here have become more careful with new platforms because there have been cases where casinos ran off with user funds even after building a good reputation.

I see some people easily judge a casino because of some similarities. But as long as this casino is not guilty of this accusation, that will be okay. Besides, most casinos look the same per se. the games, developers, designs, etc.

Until there are no concerning issues about Lucky.fun, trust of the gambling community remains certain.

Are you serious?
Lol, I just hope you continue to develop lucky.fun casino and actively market it here so we can get real feedback. Honestly, I'm really looking forward to the sports betting launch. If there's a deadline, I'm getting impatient.

I have never heard of this casino, and the team is unrelated. I'm the (only) founder of lucky.fun and I'm fully doxxed. You guys can search up my name on Youtube to see what I did before I started Lucky, you'll see I don't come from this industry, but was actually a very good customer haha

Bangladesh is performing consistently well against Pakistan. Pakistan needs 437 runs to win the match, which is an impossible task on this pitch and the batting will get more difficult in the last two days.

If Pakistan manages to survive the entire day tomorrow, it will be a miracle. Bangladesh has all the time in the world to take all their wickets and clean sweep the series for the second time in a row.

Pakistan already conceded the match when they fell behind in the first innings. Just curious to see how long they will bat and how many runs they will be scoring.

Although I too never got banned anywhere and I too have played in more than hundred casinos, I would suggest taking a screenshot if for that you have to just push one and then it's automatically saved in a folder(that's how it is on my computer). You can clean that folder once in a year, reflecting on the deposits you made in the process if you delete the screenshots one by one. It can give an idea on how much you spend on gambling, and that's a useful thing.

I dont think this is the right way to interpret this. In fact, casinos want to offer their services to every single human being as the larger the player base is the more the wagering and the more the rake. But despite this, casinos also have to deal with local regulations and license conditions.


Exactly.

I don't believe they don't know what a forum is and I don't think the problem is with the forum and cryptocurrencies, but rather that the ban is the result of very high gambling activity on the forum. However, as you already wrote, the forum can still be accessed with a VPN or Tor, and if everyone used one of those (and they should), this topic wouldn't even exist.

It honestly surprises me how few people on this forum have a sense of privacy as if we were on a forum for growing flowers and ornamental plants.

No, absolutely not. In a way, I am ready to practice your religion for the peace it teaches🤗🙏. Every  person should understand that a joke is applicable in this case. If you read carefully, here is the direction to the account itself, which clearly changed hands and shamefully ran away after attracting the attention of many for its inconsistency.
But again, if I offended someone, the irony lies with the one who wanted to impersonate the real owner.

Wrong choice of words, I guess, sorry for that.
What I meant is, they ruined our chance to access the website. That is more appropriate.
I didn’t mean that they destroyed everything completely, just that their actions affected other users who only wanted normal access.

I guess it depends on what kind of government you have. if hey are corrupt, then you are correct.
https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/philippines

Banning half of the countries in the world as an international casino doesn't make sense. Even if restrictions are make, it should be few countries and not such a large number. If a casino know that large number is not trustworthy to participate in their casinos then it is good they make it a local casino for the local people to Play as an offline casinos.

Yes, you are right, this industry has many restrictions, so every brand must take into account many factors.

That is actually the worst situation happening here and this is unacceptable for those people still have stuck funds on their casino.

This action would actually tell that they don't have plans to pay those stuck withdrawals and those promises to buy time then escape with their obligations. If they are serious they will not allow to make those withdrawals to get stuck for long time, but situation happening is different and actually they are totally abandoning people here and no plans to do a refund.

And the saddest part is that they haven't processed any withdrawals for around 10 months despite making promises and they continued allowing users to make deposits for four months after they completely stopped processing withdrawals.

Your point is really valid, because those big casinos usually want to protect the reputation they build. One or multiple cases like selective scamming can possibly wipe out the trust they earned also those huge revenues they are getting to their players.

Although I still remember those bad incidents made by 1xbet since if we talk about selective scamming they are famous for doing that actions before. Also what happen to this casino is also surprising and for sure no one expect that they became like this because they are so successful.  Those small casino have more chance to do those scams because they have nothing to lose, while those big casinos has a lot to risk.

I think that among the big casinos, scams like the one that happened with Freebitcoin are more of an exception. What I mean is that if a casino has become large and popular enough, it will be more concerned about its reputation, because one wrong move could cause its audience to lose trust, which in turn would lead to huge losses in revenue.

Some users are still able to access the website, though. So preventing users from accessing their accounts makes no sense.

A better way could have been completely disabling the sign-in and sign-up options. Like the user in the reply said, maybe there is something they are working on, and it has led to some errors on the website.

While the Pakistani team is playing cricket in any format, you never need to be surprised by their performance because now it's their trademark, they are always bringing themselves into situations like this and have a hobby of losing matches without giving any serious trouble to their opponents. In this game, their decisions and their performance were worse, just because of this, having a third defeat against Bangladesh in the last three test matches.

Now in the upcoming match, pressure could be on Pakistan, and they can lose another match because Bangladesh already has secured a win and draw for this series, and Pakistan needed to fight back after this level performance. Now, who is going out and who is coming in is also watchful.

Abdullah Fazal was standing alone and scored 66 runs, but Imam Ul Haq and Azan Awais lost wickets early, that's why he was struggling to carry the momentum. On the other hand, Nahid Rana, with an extreme kind of pace and wonderful swing, knows how to trick batsmen, got five wickets and helped the team Bangladesh. By the way, Bangladesh really found an extraordinary bowler, one and only Nahid Rana.

where there is easy money to be made, scammers are bound to show up. but what makes this different, is that compared to the scam betmoco and betmanor pulled off, this wasn't some amateur.
they went through all the trouble of setting up a company, getting a license, paying people to promote the website (not just on the forum).

my guess is someone deposited a large amount that the owner could not resist not scamming, or they were working with a limited bankroll with shitty bankroll management, and were hoping people would lose, but the house ended up in the red and decided to just take everyone money instead of dealing with that, or it's as simple as they were planning this from the start, it's honestly one of the weirdest cases i've seen, the only similar case i can think of is betnomi.

having or not having a license is worthless nowadays in terms of vetting crypto casinos, i would avoid any casino without a real solid reputation tbh, unless you only play with small amounts, so even if you get scammed it won't hurt that much.

only if everyone would think that way, but 1k, 10k, 50k is considered small amounts to some people.

Nowadays there are just too many casinos which looks similar one to another and about its connection to Moneytree.games, it can be a coincidence but of course we have the right to ask but not to judge.
Whether they are indeed managed by the same person or not, it will be nice if they can say something about it although it is not mandatory.
As long as this one is operating normally and serving all their players professionally, this is the most important thing.