I re-applied again cause my previous application was old (1 week ago), that slot was filled.
then the campaign manager opened new slot next week that's why i applied again.


Mate, if you look closely normally I delete my old application if not getting accepted into campaign to reduce unnecessary post from my account.
Not only here, I do it every time.

That old application I deleted when the campaign slot filled, But after some moment one participant left the campaign and manager opened new slot.
I copied what I found in front of me, this is an honest mistake.

When a loan is given to an account in the forum, the account becomes the collateral. So, if someone has two accounts and borrows from a particular lender with it, it therefore means that the person has their two accounts at stake.
How sure are you that if the lender knows the two accounts belong to one person he will not happily still give out loan to both of them and take his interest?

If you give negative tags often for something you feel is unethical, it will water down the effects of negative tag.
A negative tag isn't something you give and people will start debating about it. If you are not so sure, use the neutral tag.

I can't see any rules against it on DarkStar's Loans thread or lending board guidelines.
If you repaid correctly and until you break any rules negative tag should not be applied, in my opinion.

With full collateral it is fine, not optimal but it is fine. With no collateral loans it is absolutely wrong and they should receive negative trust just for that.

If you check correctly I just copied my above post and forgotten to edit it and posted it without edit. and instantly I edited it with my info.

I don't know if you remember a user named Ratimov, but he started out as a newbie reporter, cleaning up the Russian-language section...

https://ninjastic.space/post/52131782

He later earned a large number of merits from the local merit source, specifically for his work. I'm saying this because the trust of the moderators is earned not only by rank but also by the accuracy of reports. Sometimes, newbies can be very helpful by reading and simultaneously reporting posts they consider useless. The great thing about the forum is that it's open to everyone's input.

It is not just the U-19 team. The BCB also ignores their A and domestic teams. As a result of this, the player pool is limited and therefore the BCB is forced to experiment with the same players again and again. For the emerging players, the only avenue is to play domestic cricket in countries such as England or Australia, if they want to improve their skillset. No other gateways are available for them. Look at the recently concluded test match between Ireland and Bangladesh. Once again, it was the senior players who starred in that win. And what will happen if they are unavailable for selection?

Scam Accusation board turned into help center for BC game for a while and holydarkness is trying his best to resolve everything in the favor of the affected party but as you said these guys are not learning anything from the previous mistakes and I can't understand how they managed to go upto three deposits if their first one itself got stuck.

You are also right, but from my point of view I think to be a strong team in every format their is kust need the team work but unfortunately in current day when we saw the Bangladesh squad there is only few players are doing a little bit good performance and on the others hand when the poncho Pnadyop were in the team I am talking about Musfiq, Mahmudullah, Mashrafi, Tamim, Shakib when they were in team Bangladesh team was in good form but in current day we couldn't find any player like that squad where we saw the team work and that's why we are facing the worst situation.

Since you have been in bitcoin since atleast 2017 the year you registered on a forum related to it, you probably have more intelligence on this topic than he does.
I have heard of this cryptocurrency influencer you had mentioned since they've been successful in some of their predictions or else they would of left the scene along time ago. They do rely on the number of followers or they simply do not become relevant and don't see a reason to continue if no one is listening to what they have to say.
These are some very good points you have made and it shows they are based from experience, inwhich I believe this self-proclaimed high IQ individual obviously seems to lack.

Actually, I made the same mistake that we common Bangladeshi fans do, we often forget that format plays a big role in a team's performance. For example, I compared the T20 series or format with the Test series and that's where I was wrong.
I thought that since the Bangladesh team did exceptionally well in the Test series, maybe they will perform similarly in the T20 or ODI format, but the fact that format is a big factor has been proven again. We also saw the Bangladesh team play well in the West Indies series in the ODI format but were whitewashed in the T20 format.

The participants i selected made very good posts when I read them, I will definitely select some of them for any campaign I manage, I feel some deserved it.

I will let everyone know in the if I hold the funds or not so it will the communication gap if there may be any regarding it in my future campaigns too, I will also want to run campaign by some rules of mine and try to be as much transparent as I can be.

Thank you.
Reaver

Speaking of people speculating on the Bitcoin price reaching a certain range. I believe most of them just want to be the topic in the news, especially in the crypto space, where Bitcoin is prioritized because even a baby Bitcoiner can easily understand that BTC can't reach such a price range within the days he (the highest IQ record holder) stated, based on the market correction that always happens after the BTC halving effect market.

Associating having a high IQ one would think he came to this conclusion while doing some sort of calculation while looking at charts and spending extensive time doing research.
But he could just be one of those who just have a channel on youtube and giving their price predictions on bitcoin.
There are thousands of these type of people doing this already and most of the time they are completely wrong.

Wow, we have a "modest" malware here, instead of it draining the entire balance of the wallet, it diverts a certain amount through the fees, lol.

That is why I avoid using Bitcoin/crypto-related extensions on chrome/brave, as you are much more likely to contract malware with a crypto extension than an non-crypto-related.


A good way to avoid falling victim to malicious software and extensions is by carefully checking the permissions that the App requests before downloading it, a calculator doesn't need to have access to your contacts and microphone and so on.
Thank you for reporting this.

Dude, you were actually right, I actually had high hopes for the Bangladesh team that since they did well in the Test series, they would be able to do well in the T20 series as well, but unfortunately they did the opposite here.
While I had hoped that Bangladesh openers Tanzid Hasan and Litton Das would at least perform well, the top four, including these two, could only score ten runs together, which is a big shame. However, if Towhid Hridoy had not saved Bangladesh from a bigger embarrassment by scoring 83 runs off 50 balls, Bangladesh would have been all out before they could have scored more than 50 runs. 

Bitcoin might not have control over who is going to use it. But I remember some attempts from mining pools to censor OFAC-sanctioned transactions. It turned out to be a failure later on, but the thing is, mining pools can decide whenever to include transactions on the Blockchain or not. So if a transaction is deemed "illegal", the community will probably give the "green light" for miners to do their thing.

Technically, criminals are crooked with Bitcoin. They're better off using Fiat as they've been doing until now. Once cash (coins and paper money) is phased out of existence, criminals will simply switch to physical Gold and/or Silver coins. Or they will move to privacy coins instead. Thank goodness Bitcoin is transparent. It's more of a feature than a bug to help detect malicious actors on-chain. With BTC now getting institutionalized, the days of the "wild west" are officially over.

Shouldn't this guy do his research before deciding to post a review? As long as he didn't know it's ok according to you?

I advised him that making a separate thread for each site was likely not the best route to go and he failed to listen or even acknowledge the post. If you look at all his reviews of each site he has posted, they are mostly the same also. He is not giving fair reviews, he is giving 100% positive reviews without caring for you or any other potential customer. You really think this guy should be allowed to continue?

As far as the negative trust goes, you might be correct and negative might not be the correct way to go about this. I will revise to a neutral for now, but 1 more positive review for a shit site and I will return my tag to a negative and not look back. @memehunter and The Cryptovator feel free to do as you wish with your feedbacks, but consider changing to neutral for now.

@casinoresearchernorth do as your name states and actually research casinos before you post a review here, and consider my advice to make 1 dedicated thread.

It makes no sense that they start to ask the gambler to provide the source of funds if they prefer to deposit through privacy coins. If they have any intention they should explicitly write it on the site that deposit with certain crypto will lead to further investigations etc.


Can you share the link to the scam accusation, and also which exchange has done this? It is not good if the crypto exchanges and casinos start asking for deposits, they should only be concerned that people's deposit and use their platform.

If WolfBet is going to tighten the KYC process, why add this privacy coin? If players know that they are depositing a large amount of privacy coins, and then the casino asks about the source of funds, they will be reluctant to make another deposit.

But maybe it could be that WolfBet will not record KYC, we don't know how much they do, with the policies in their ToS it is possible that if there is suspicion the casino will be the same as the exchange does by asking where the source of funds is.

Privacy coins will be most favorite targets of governments after they massively attack mixers. Any company includes online gambling company has to obey to law and regulations as well as adapt to latest legal changes. If governments tighten their policies against privacy coins, business companies must follow that new regulation changes and Wolf.bet as a licensed company will not be an exception.

Privacy is important, so let's enjoy it whenever you can until there are something enforced to tighten our access to privacy coins and platforms accept privacy coins drop in numbers.

Criminals could use privacy coins, but they will often face many obstacles that would make their life harder (such as reduced liquidity, higher volatility, and limited Fiat trading pairs). Since criminals prefer convenience, they will continue to use Fiat for illegal activities. It's stable, can be used offline, and in a completely anonymous way (sort of).

Of course, that doesn't mean all criminals will avoid Bitcoin. Some of them will use it as "Digital Gold" to store their wealth for the long-term. Especially if we're talking about tech-savvy criminals. Just like any other tech, Bitcoin is a "double-edged" sword. Use it responsibly, and there should be nothing to worry about.

There is the link

---

The App or extension appeared to be so active about 10 months ago and looking at the transaction history, there are no recent ones which mean either people abandoned using it or they changed the deposit address

Here is the transaction history of the hacker's address - https://solscan.io/account/Bjeida13AjgPaUEU9xrh1iQMwxZC7QDdvSfg73oxQff7