Last update: 2025-11-17_Mon_14.54h (Amsterdam time)

Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.

Shishir99 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned

Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
nobody
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none


Username "Shishir99" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):


1. Post 66060066 (unedited backup) (by Revolution2025) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 14:49:43 CET 2025) in JollyGood, my bad, JollyBad deserves to be removed from DT:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 10:46:03 AM
<snip>

<snip>
Incredible! finally, seen people who are coming up with the truth that JollyGood gives most of his tags based on guts feeling and not because of strong evidence. So what will it profit him to tag numerous accounts wrongly without concrete evidence. It's high time his tags should not be taken seriously! and thanks to him for the role he played in bursting scams and cheaters which were actually correct in the past.



2. Post 66059611 (unedited backup) (by lovesmayfamilis) (scraped on Mon Nov 17 12:59:37 CET 2025) in JollyGood, my bad, JollyBad deserves to be removed from DT:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 10:46:03 AM
That is irony, mate, because you leave feedback based on your gut and not any evidence.

In a way, I also want to support you here, Shishir99. When I asked JollyGood a question in this thread, I was ignored, and I think it was because he didn't have any compelling evidence to accuse the two accounts of being alternative accounts.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on November 15, 2025, 01:55:51 PM

Hmm. I'd like to ask you, JollyGood, to check these two accounts. Can you confirm that these wallets belong to alternative accounts?
https://ninjastic.space/address/bc1qq8fy0hlc4ahyeejyyammc0fzfn82r23djw2xt2

I see a lot of similarities. However, I'd really like to hear your opinion.
It is important for me not to make mistakes and to try to provide evidence. Smiley



 I don't know if he can conduct such an analysis or not, but the point where JollyGood is considering tagging someone, regardless of whether there's a specific reason for the tag, was made in this thread recently. I'll quote it. They said something like, "We need to leave the tag, no matter who the  @Cryptomultiplie account is linked to. The main thing is that the tag is needed!"Huh Roll Eyes Grin
Quote from: JollyGood on November 15, 2025, 01:23:23 PM
Look at the post history of Cryptomultiplier account and you will see this is not his only account therefore anything is possible. Unless something changes, I think for now at least a neutral tag with a reference link regarding the possibility of it being an alt-account (of "coaltin")  should more than suffice.


Yes, many of JollyGood's tags have subsequently been confirmed, but in any case, I don't think they should be applied to everyone who seems suspicious. I'm not sure this is how the trust system is supposed to work. Managers should rely on tags, but leaving tags with suspicions that this account isn't a newbie, or that another account isn't a newbie and has a farm, won't give them confidence. And that, in turn, devalues ​​the tag itself. After all, we have a lot of alternative accounts in many sections that don't post like newbies from their first posts, but without linking them to someone, it's simply pointless to mention.


That's why I asked if JollyGood could comment on the link I provided. Because the tag he left,  @Cryptomultiplier, is practically a mirror image of this link.
https://ninjastic.space/address/bc1qq8fy0hlc4ahyeejyyammc0fzfn82r23djw2xt2

Furthermore, I would like those who leave tags to also carefully check everything that is posted in the discussion of the topics started, and not rely on the first post without reading and conducting additional evidence.
I apologize for the links being provided from another thread, simply because the discussion concerns one person.



3. Post 66056040 (unedited backup) (by pusaka) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 15:45:13 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 11:53:21 AM
I don't have a good internet connection, and I am not a big fan of live games. I sometimes play slot games when I participate in contests or when I feel lucky, but I mostly prefer playing in-house games. I liked how Betpanda Mines games actually work. If you click on one cell and move your cursor over the other cells, they open automatically, so you don't need to click again and again to open those cells.
Internet connections can sometimes be disruptive, disrupting what should be an exciting game, ultimately leading to frustration. So, when my internet connection is problematic, I usually pause the game until it's back up (where I live, internet outages are common).

Have you ever experienced a slot machine where the reels never stop because of a poor internet connection?  Grin It's incredibly frustrating. I've experienced this, and I've ended up abandoning my gambling plans and returning the next day.



4. Post 66055626 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Sun Nov 16 13:42:32 CET 2025) in JollyGood, my bad, JollyBad deserves to be removed from DT:

Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on November 15, 2025, 03:26:05 PM
He is one of those who understands trust from the “aggressive” side, perhaps the most aggressive of all
Not true, it is just a story people fabricated  Grin

Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on November 15, 2025, 04:43:42 PM
With the decline in testosterone over the last 50 years, if people call me aggressive, I wear it as a badge of honor.
One tag here or there that could be deemed contentious does not constitute "aggressive".

Sometimes a member that takes a dislike to you starts a campaign against you in the hope of trying to get others. You know, say a lie and repeat it and then hope others start believing it.

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 11:35:52 AM
I don't want to go through all those hundreds of tags and point out which one you should revisit.
This is the exact reply I expected from you. No substance, just rubbish.

Stop playing with semantics, stop twisting words to suit your ridiculous agenda.

I am not revisiting any tags, I am standing by each and every neutral and negative tag I left for others.

You unilaterally stated my tags were "too aggressive" therefore I challenged you to point out the tags you deemed were "too aggressive". Furthermore, I clearly stated if you read the reference link and feedback context and then provide your justification for why the tags are wrong, I will gladly consider revising the tag/tags. You failed to provide an iota of a reason yet you made the claim.

You made a statement about me that you cannot back up. Forget about providing any evidence to back up your nonsense, you now claim you will not read through the negative tags. I suspect you already did and found nothing at all therefore you posted the expected nonsense reply.

You were the one claiming my tags were "too aggressive" but you failed to provide any evidence. Instead you opted for the coward excuse of "I will not go through the tags..."

If you cannot be bothered to point out any of the negative tags that you deem to be "too aggressive" then do not make statements you cannot back up by presenting evidence.

Stop spouting nonsense about me and forget your obsession with me. Move on and focus your attention back to the possible account farm you created your thread about.



5. Post 66053556 (unedited backup) (by bhadz) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 22:42:07 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 12:18:54 PM
the fact that many people prefer no KYC (Know Your Customer) policies, and this is something you’ve also implemented on your casino platform,
is another positive step. I think this is a great decision you’ve made, so I hope you’ll continue to do even more for your gamblers in the future.

Did I miss something? Where did they actually mention that they are no KYC? I can clearly see that they noted that the withdrawals are now instant and the withdrawal fees are now zero until the end of this year, which we should all appreciate. But where did you find the information about no KYC requirements? As far as I know, they are a KYC casino that can request a KYC verification at any time.

I played there, but I did not have to submit my KYC. Has anyone from this thread actually triggered KYC on Spinly? Even if the answer is no, still they are not a no KYC casino since they reserve the rights to ask for KYC whenever they want.
You are right, I haven't been asked for KYC but I am aware that it can trigger anytime. But as long as the amounts won't be that much, I guess that it won't trigger for any follow up KYC and I can still enjoy to play some sugar rush without having any problems at all thinking of that to be subjected to kyc and what you've said about they have the rights to do it any moment is true.



6. Post 66052260 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 17:02:31 CET 2025) in JollyGood, my bad, JollyBad deserves to be removed from DT:

Show me one negative tag that is too aggressive or unjustified: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855

If you manage to find one negative tag that you disagree, then try to find another. If somehow you manage to find a second one then proceed to see if you can find a third. List any negative feedback you think is "too aggressive", I would like to see it/them.

Let us first see if you find any aggressive negative tags and if you do, provide an explanation why that/those negative tags were too aggressive in order to compare with the reference link and justification I gave for the negative tag in question. If you can show me I was wrong, I will gladly consider revising the negative tag/tags.

I am waiting, where are these "too aggressive" negative tags you refer to?

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 11:53:33 AM
It is known that he is too aggressive in handing out negative tags. But in most cases, he was proved right.



7. Post 66052161 (unedited backup) (by Fivestar4everMVP) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 16:41:07 CET 2025) in Spinly.io 🎰✨ - Next-gen Crypto iGaming Platform 🚀💸:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 12:18:54 PM
the fact that many people prefer no KYC (Know Your Customer) policies, and this is something you’ve also implemented on your casino platform,
is another positive step. I think this is a great decision you’ve made, so I hope you’ll continue to do even more for your gamblers in the future.

Did I miss something? Where did they actually mention that they are no KYC? I can clearly see that they noted that the withdrawals are now instant and the withdrawal fees are now zero until the end of this year, which we should all appreciate. But where did you find the information about no KYC requirements? As far as I know, they are a KYC casino that can request a KYC verification at any time.

I played there, but I did not have to submit my KYC. Has anyone from this thread actually triggered KYC on Spinly? Even if the answer is no, still they are not a no KYC casino since they reserve the rights to ask for KYC whenever they want.
Exactly bud, some person mistakenly assume a casino is a no kyc casino because they haven't demanded kyc verification from any user which they saw, they forget anything that has to do with KYC isn't really about what the casino does but more about what is written in their terms of service/conditions..

It is very hard to find a serious online casino that has plans of going and becoming big in the gambling industry that won't be complaint to the regulators through kyc, except the casino is a decentralized one, of which we all can agree that there hasn't been any decentralized casino so far that can match any of the big centralized casinos..



8. Post 66051753 (unedited backup) (by mitchr4) (scraped on Sat Nov 15 14:52:02 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:18:22 PM


This was pretty quick, right?

If I remember correctly, it was LFC_Bitcoin who said that Betpanda will take it back in the long run. Well, I agree with that, but for your information, I am still positive about Betpanda, and I did it again within 10 minutes. I love playing Betpanda originals, and I made a $30 deposit, won another $20 in ten minutes, and decided to withdraw it all. I am pretty surprised by the withdrawal release speed. Each time I request a withdrawal, it gets released within a minute. Just look at the transaction time; everything happened too fast.
From your transaction history, everything looks really fast the deposit and the withdrawal. Betpanda Originals are good choice for people who like quick games and instant wins. I also prefer those games over other casino games, especially Live Casino which sometimes needs a stable and fast internet connection to play smoothly and comfy.



9. Post 66047692 (unedited backup) (by ibuddy122505) (scraped on Fri Nov 14 15:35:01 CET 2025) in Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod]:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:06:59 PM
As predicted, Bangladesh won by an innings already. Not everyone performs in the same way. So Mushies' failure will be overlooked because the team already scored almost 600 runs, which is a big score anywhere in the world. Bangladesh needs to play on wickets like this one in Sylhet. Bangladesh should avoid hosting matches in Mirpur, as the wickets there are notoriously poor. Even Bangladeshi cricketers criticized the BCB dozens of times for such a wicket. 

I would be pretty happy if they could have won the match against any good team like Pakistan, India, or even Sri Lanka. I feel like winning against Ireland is a must. Losing a match against them will confirm the downfall of Bangladesh cricket.
Bangladesh pulled off a convincing innings win over Ireland. It was a complete, defining performance as their bowlers dominated in both innings, while the batters built a solid foundation with strong scores. That puts Bangladesh 1-0 up in the series. Wins like this definitely lift up their confidence, but as you said, beating a stronger team would bring even more joy to them and fans like us. For now, we can only hope they keep the momentum going.



10. Post 66047518 (unedited backup) (by DdmrDdmr) (scraped on Fri Nov 14 14:45:31 CET 2025) in Bitcointalk Ranking-up pipeline - Those that are close to their next rank:

Data as of 14/11/2025

Updated the lists in the OP (and subsequent post) to reflect the forum members that still qualify in each of those lists.

Currently, on those lists there are, lacking <= 20% merits to rank-up (activity may not be met though):

-  112 Heroes (on their way to Legendries)
-  119 Sr. Members (on their way to Heroes)
-    92 Full Members (on their way to Sr. Members)
-    89 Members (on their way to Full Members)
-  261 Jr. Members (on their way to Members)

Added this week (9):
Code:
user_id        name                               Status         posts     activity  activity_Met   merit     rank           ProbableInitialRank trust               url
971544         Shishir99                          Active         2938      1176      Y*             818       Hero Member    Sr. Member          =+1 / =0 / -0       https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971544
3629575        memehunter                         Active         3188      560       N              803       Hero Member    New Era Newbie      =+5 / =0 / -0       https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3629575
3491210        Mrbluntzy                          Active         1686      700       Y              206       Full Member    New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0       https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3491210
3701137        Rgram                              Active         409       210       N              203       Full Member    New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0       https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3701137
3709095        Guccho                             Active         139       139       Y              89        Member         New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0       https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3709095
2034734        mumang siat                        Active         536       536       Y              84        Member         New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2034734
1027389        asUHWEceyc                         Active         63        63        N              80        Member         New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1027389
3730852        Big Dirams                         Active         57        56        N              9         Jr. Member     New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3730852
3700842        melinoe                            Active         449       238       Y              8         Jr. Member     New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3700842

Removed (*) this week (9):
Code:
user_id        name                               Status         posts     activity  activity_Met   merit     rank           ProbableInitialRank trust               url
3587264        Cryptoprincess101                  Active         2385      770       N              500       Hero Member    New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3587264
3570336        Su-asa                             Active         2735      826       Y*             500       Hero Member    New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3570336
3492563        tech30338                          Active         1487      952       Y              253       Sr. Member     Member              =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3492563
3517454        Pablo-wood                         Active         865       616       Y              252       Sr. Member     New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3517454
3697623        Jostern                            Active         915       252       N              250       Sr. Member     New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3697623
3688663        Creeper0                           Active         131       131       N              100       Full Member    New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3688663
3598529        Boy_chef                           Active         65        65        N              23        Member         New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3598529
3659547        Crytohillss                        Active         85        85        N              23        Member         New Era Newbie      =+0 / =0 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3659547
3682456        Barrykbest                         Active         85        84        N              10        Member         New Era Newbie      =+0 / =1 / -0  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3682456
(*) Due to enough merits for the next rank, or being banned.



11. Post 66044929 (unedited backup) (by dezoel) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 21:23:13 CET 2025) in Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod]:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 02:35:42 PM
It seems Bangladesh is going to win the match by an innings.
Bangladesh has a history of losing test matches against Zimbabwe. I almost forgot that Bangladesh can actually win a test match. I am unsure if Bangladesh will gain any confidence from this match. Nahid Rana seems to have bowled pretty well in the first innings and got a fifer. Can he get another fifer in the 2nd innings as well? Ireland has already lost five wickets, and Nahid Rana got one of them. This guy has some potential. BCB needs to utilize him.
At home Bangladesh doing good job with bat and ball which is good sign but they still needed good development for having better results against top teams because their record against top teams has never been ideal in this test match from start they are in good control.

Bangladeshi top order done good job as all score 50+ Mushi was one of who fail to produce good knock after having huge bundle of runs in second inning Ireland gone badly which is worst for them because most chances they are going to lose this match by huge deficit as their top order badly fail to produce runs. Mahmudul Hasan Joy fail to score double century still his inning was important for home team as they scored 587 runs and took lead of 300 which is vital for their win on fourth day of first test match.



12. Post 66043948 (unedited backup) (by bobstone) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 17:20:43 CET 2025) in Deposit stolen by Duckdice.io:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 02:15:14 PM
It is good to know that the matter is now solved. OP, please confirm once you return and update the thread title as well.

Welcome back bobstone. It is nice to see you around again. I think someone posted a link to a Duckdice forum post about you, where I saw that you were not working for DD at that moment. It is nice to see you again. Since you are here again, can we expect some promotional campaigns from Duckdice again? Duckdice is not that active anymore in the community.

Hi,

Yes there was a bit of a situation of my own making mixed with a big scare to my health, however all is now well and i'm back under a new role,

as to what to expect here with bitcointalk, we will see, there are no immediate plans, it's fair to say we have had a rocky relationship with this community, some our fault, some well organised bad actors, some just people quick to judge (again some of this is probably our fault), but i will try to maintain a much more active presence around here Smiley May i suggest if you wish to further discuss anything related to us, you find our main thread and ask me there.

Kind Regards,
Bobstone, Community Head, DuckDice.



13. Post 66043578 (unedited backup) (by noorman0) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 15:51:38 CET 2025) in [Finding] The Same Wallet Was Used by Two Different Accounts:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:40:32 PM
-snip-
How can both addresses be in the same transaction as inputs if it does not belong to the same seed phrases?
@Satofan44 is correct about his theory. Binance and other centralized exchanges will regularly consolidate all or some user deposits into hot wallets, depending on how they configure their consolidation triggers. The primary function of an exchange's hot wallet is to "pull" users' coins directly from their respective deposit addresses. It's not always because they have the same key or seed, but rather, Binance has all the keys generated from users' deposit addresses, and their system somehow creates bulk transactions that can be collectively signed and broadcasted.

Because in a single payment schedule, those two addresses are highly likely to be consolidated at the same time.



14. Post 66043564 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 15:48:01 CET 2025) in [Finding] The Same Wallet Was Used by Two Different Accounts:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:54:43 PM
Read my post, unless you think that this signature participant is extremely rich this theory does not make sense.
This signature participant owns more than 10 accounts in this forum and probably earns a good amount of money. But I am not saying he owns that receiver wallet. That wallet surely belongs to Binance Exchange.
Enough of this Dunning Kruger bullshit. If you want to become an experienced hunter as some here are, you need to listen to feedback and learn how Bitcoin works. I don't have any experience hunting, but I am well versed with the latter. Much more than 99.999% of the users of this forum. If I am telling you to reconsider and that you are wrong, then use your brain to ask questions instead of repeating the same shit over and over again.

Here is some GPT magic.
Code:
                            +----------------------------------------------------+
                            |       Binance Consolidation Address                |
                            |  bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp        |
                            +------------------------+---------------------------+
                                                     ^
                                                     |
                                    (BINANCE SPENDING — internal sweep)
                                                     |
        +--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
        |                                                                                         |
+------------------------------------+                                       +------------------------------------+
| Binance Deposit Address (User 1)   |                                       | Binance Deposit Address (User 2)   |
| (User 1 UTXOs)                     |                                       | (User 2 UTXOs)                     |
|------------------------------------|                                       |------------------------------------|
| bc1qu9tl7ng322hduq0uytjjvhnqmv2erccxx9r9uk |                              | bc1q58dvavj470736793g8dwalm8ejt3uku0vs9ye3 |
+----------------------+---------------+                                       +---------------+------------------+
                       ^                                                                       ^
                       |                                                                       |
                       |                                                                       |
          (External deposit from user 1)                                         (External deposit from user 2)
                       |                                                                       |
                       v                                                                       v
           +---------------------------+                                       +---------------------------+
           | Campaign / Source          |                                       | Campaign / Source          |
           +---------------------------+                                       +---------------------------+



What is not clear?



15. Post 66043344 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 14:54:43 CET 2025) in [Finding] The Same Wallet Was Used by Two Different Accounts:

Quote from: Satofan44 on Today at 01:42:59 PM
Read my post, unless you think that this signature participant is extremely rich this theory does not make sense.
This signature participant owns more than 10 accounts in this forum and probably earns a good amount of money. But I am not saying he owns that receiver wallet. That wallet surely belongs to Binance Exchange.

Quote
In this case, we can see that the transaction has 7 inputs from 6 different addresses, and all those inputs belong to the same wallet owner.
Which is Binance.


Stop spamming shit both of you and go back to the basics, learn how UTXO consolidation works.

What about going back to where you belong? Be a regular forum member instead of insulting people over trivial matters. I always notice that you are being jerky with each forum member. Just don't cross my path next time, or I will be a Jerk as well. I understand that you are not mentally stable and a frustrated kid who grew up in a slum fighting others, but that's not how the entire world works. Asshole.



16. Post 66043301 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 14:43:02 CET 2025) in [Finding] The Same Wallet Was Used by Two Different Accounts:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:40:32 PM
How can both addresses be in the same transaction as inputs if it does not belong to the same seed phrases? It is only possible when you send all funds from the wallet, consolidate all your address inputs, and then send the funds to a receiver's address.
Read my post, unless you think that this signature participant is extremely rich this theory does not make sense.

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:40:32 PM
bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp
This is not a deposit address, it has received over 27 thousand Bitcoin.



17. Post 66041122 (unedited backup) (by coupable) (scraped on Thu Nov 13 00:12:03 CET 2025) in I didn’t receive my deposit in bc game account money has been debited from bank:

Quote from: Shishir99 on November 09, 2025, 01:05:02 PM
Did you delete the post from October 28th quoted by holydark in above reply? In that post you didn't say anything about your friend who asked you to post in his behalf. I want to know what should be his reason to do so. From this point, your chance to get your case resolved is reduced to zero even by providing all the deposit proof. At best scenarios you may ask for a refund but this is more complex.

I valid the advice posted above; avoid deposit FIAT if you are a crypto gambler fan.

We need to wait for a little so holydarkness can come up with a result. He said that he will ask his contact to run a first check on the UID to see if there are any multiple account issues. If everything comes clean, then holydarkness promised to help him with this case. We no longer have to believe him, as holydarkness can verify it with the BC game. I think you've already noticed that several new accounts are popping up here and making accusations against casinos. It is alarming that all those people know who is holydarkness. Some of them even admitted that they are running some mediator services with the help of this forum. LOL.
If the multi accounting is proven, you have no options to defend your case whatever henest you may be. In addition to that the deposit was made via bank transfer which complicated things more.

Already 4 days passed and there are no updates either from OP or from holydark. I don't expect them kept contact in private so i wish Op post some updates.



18. Post 66040334 (unedited backup) (by Rating Place) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 20:24:31 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io confiscated all my winnings:

Quote from: Betpanda on Today at 01:51:17 PM
Hello,

Happy to elaborate on the matter.

I assume they flagged your account for doing arbitrage betting or value betting.

We do not flag accounts, this is all initiated and carried out by our sportsbook provider who simply inform us of the outcome of their investigation. We assess the situation and take action depending on the outcome of the investigation. Furthermore, they do not provide us with any further information about what caused the investigation, such as specific bets for example.

As mentioned earlier in the thread, their notes tell us that the user had, as per their investigation, engaged in value betting and/or arbitrage betting. The part of our terms which was breached was mentioned in the email thread we had with user.

However, they may not return your last deposit as well for having unfriendly terms related to deposit confiscation.

The player in question was informed at the time that they are able to withdraw the net value of their latest deposit, but the player decided to not to do so and after some time, the account was closed permanently.

Hence we would strongly disagree with the notion that we are a "scam", as we are merely following the information provided to us by our Sportsbook provider and subsequently our Terms and Conditions.

If you have any further questions, we are happy to answer them but this is pretty much all the information which we have available.
Most books besides Betpanda, XYes and Winna limit for value betting. A player doesn't know he is value betting since know one knows value until the line closes. If a player makes a bet a day before the match, we don't know if it's a value bet until one day later. 



19. Post 66039410 (unedited backup) (by JollyGood) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 16:19:19 CET 2025) in Massive alt farm of my country - 10+ accounts. :

Most of the names are identical to those mentioned in other threads therefore there is some substance and reason to discuss these accounts. Most (if not all) of these accounts should never have been enrolled in campaigns. Hopefully, they will all be removed the campaigns they seem to be currently enrolled in.


Quote from: Shishir99 on November 09, 2025, 06:59:47 AM
LDL
Popkon6
2Pizza410000BTC
HelliumZ
Fuso.hp
cryptoWODL
Lidger
synchronym
AirtelBuzz



20. Post 66039229 (unedited backup) (by lovesmayfamilis) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 15:28:02 CET 2025) in User beveryu778 spamming on the Landing section.:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:33:37 PM

Do you think people are foolish enough to believe you?
You just made a mistake and edited it several times. Once you notice that you are fucked up, you just come up with an idea and pretend like you did it intentionally. No, you did not do it intentionally. People are not that stupid to do something intentionally stupid. If I ever plan to do something crazy, I would write a message with a PGP encryption, and then do it, so I can prove it later. However, the reality is that you made a mistake already and are pretending like you did it intentionally. Unfortunately, I am not a member of the DT. I would leave negative feedback on your profile for being a liar.

It's no wonder these people make mistakes. They can't figure out which account they're writing from. Not only do they have to put effort into posting, but they also have to manage five or more accounts to avoid confusion (we should feel sorry for them Grin). I once read somewhere that mental work tires a person more than physical work.

Why can't these people manage their profiles? Don't they clear their cookies when switching accounts or even change their IP addresses, let alone their writing style? Simply because the forum is doing a disservice by allowing dozens of accounts to be registered.



21. Post 66039087 (unedited backup) (by Betpanda) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 14:51:20 CET 2025) in Betpanda.io confiscated all my winnings:

Hello,

Happy to elaborate on the matter.

Quote from: Shishir99 on November 05, 2025, 01:02:21 PM
I assume they flagged your account for doing arbitrage betting or value betting.

We do not flag accounts, this is all initiated and carried out by our sportsbook provider who simply inform us of the outcome of their investigation. We assess the situation and take action depending on the outcome of the investigation. Furthermore, they do not provide us with any further information about what caused the investigation, such as specific bets for example.

As mentioned earlier in the thread, their notes tell us that the user had, as per their investigation, engaged in value betting and/or arbitrage betting. The part of our terms which was breached was mentioned in the email thread we had with user.

Quote from: Mahdirakib on November 05, 2025, 05:22:25 PM
However, they may not return your last deposit as well for having unfriendly terms related to deposit confiscation.

The player in question was informed at the time that they are able to withdraw the net value of their latest deposit, but the player decided to not to do so and after some time, the account was closed permanently.

Hence we would strongly disagree with the notion that we are a "scam", as we are merely following the information provided to us by our Sportsbook provider and subsequently our Terms and Conditions.

If you have any further questions, we are happy to answer them but this is pretty much all the information which we have available.



22. Post 66036390 (unedited backup) (by beveryu778) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 19:47:14 CET 2025) in User beveryu778 spamming on the Landing section.:

Quote from: Z_MBFM on Today at 05:12:18 PM
snip
I didn't reply to you but why did you pull it towards yourself like a magnet. You may have forgotten that you posted from another ID again to give some logical answers. When you made your post, I was reading it on my PC screen. But when I was going to reply to you, you edited your post so quickly, And you did it so fast that ninjastic.space couldn't archive your edit. I later returned to the back from the PC browser and I took a screenshot of your post. What do you say about this? Will you say it yourself or shall I explain it? But my explanation will be bitter.
Do you think you are so clever? A person can make a mistake and post something later and then correct it. Some big members like you can bully small users, and when the small ones try to do something good, bastards like you stop them. You use DT power as you wish without any valid reason. Don't you have any work? Why are you getting in the way of other people's income? I used to get $40 a week. Will those who gave me the Red Tag give me this money?


Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 05:58:31 PM
Z_MBFM You are a scammer. I will provide proof of your scamming. I know of many scammers on this forum. I will expose them all soon. Fuck you and also fuck JollyGood. He gave me an unfair Red Tag. I didn't do anything wrong here, but I was given a Red Tag.

Fuck you Linda at the front desk too (What?)
Guy in the mailroom, fuck you
You are a bigger scammer; don't cross your limit. I'll fuck every scammer very quickly with strong proof. Just wait and see.



23. Post 66036367 (unedited backup) (by Moreno233) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 19:39:56 CET 2025) in User beveryu778 spamming on the Landing section.:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 05:58:31 PM
Z_MBFM You are a scammer. I will provide proof of your scamming. I know of many scammers on this forum. I will expose them all soon. Fuck you and also fuck JollyGood. He gave me an unfair Red Tag. I didn't do anything wrong here, but I was given a Red Tag.

Fuck you Linda at the front desk too (What?)
Guy in the mailroom, fuck you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd6YLdtf37E

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Lost control?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Vw9x1vuZC8





I think I wasn't wrong in my first comment. You're so excited to getting Merit that you don't even realize when you're posting with which account. You tell yourself what you deserve, Merit or anything else  Cool


I also took a picture of this with my phone so you can't claim the screenshot as an fake edited  Grin

Edit
This could be another good proof that you edited the post.

Well, the Nigerian gang rejoice with their fellow Bengali alt farm gang.
I can smell the disaster  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
You just confirmed the point that judgement here have become biased. I just did exactly what beveryu778 did in that lending thread but it was waved off because of the person involved. Assuming a small user do that, immediately conclusion would have been reached that they are the same person. 

To be clear once again, I did that intentionally to prove a point. When Justinlamode made his post, it was waved off as inconsequential because a reputable member was involved. I intentionally wrote in similar pattern as the topic being discussed in the thread which is someone forgetting to login with his other account to see how fast the judgement will be passed since a non reputable member is now involved. You did not waste time to prove me right,You did not even noticed that I edited the post many times with different opinions which I expected you to bring using Ninjastic and LoyceV too so that the forum will take note that judgement have become opinion and suspicion and not based on fact. We are not the same person if that will satisfy your taste for blood.



24. Post 66036153 (unedited backup) (by Bitcoin Smith) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 18:36:13 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 02:18:29 PM
~
I see you are from India. The number of fiat transaction issues for Indian users increased a lot and you should stop playing on BC game till they solve it. BC game is one of the worst casino when it comes to customer support. You are unlikely to get any help from their support team. But no worries, we have a special man here @holydarkness who can help you with your case. So, consider creating a scam accusation thread first.

I just want to add that it is not only the case with BC, the stake users also had similar kind of issues from time to time. So, like I and many others suggested, avoid using INR for gambling for very serious reason that bank can freeze an account if they suspect the funds came from gambling source as per the new bill passed a couple of months back.

And also no crypto casino process the fiat payments by themselves due to regulatory issues so they are using middle men as payment processor which creates almost all the problems here.



25. Post 66035504 (unedited backup) (by Kavelj22) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 15:50:13 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:

Quote from: MusaMohamed on Today at 02:37:05 PM
Hey man, I see you have posted a couple of times already here, but no luck. I will ask you to consider creating a scam accusation thread on the scam accusation board. Link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
On top of Scam accusation board, this sticky thread is about Scam Report Format (Use it to make scam reports properly). Posters must follow this format for their scam reports against any casinos or companies in order to save time of them and also readers who want to support their scam accusations.

Posting a thread without a proper format only wastes more time for asking and asnwering questions before changing it to a right given format for more easily follow up.

Unfortunetly, most of times someone posts in the Scam accusation board, he is a newbie or a brand new account created by someone to report the unsolved case without being himself a forum user in origin. You can check any page in that board and notice that newbies are the large base of post starters.

About the format, it's the right way to post the case in a clear detailed manner. However, it's not always a mast to use the exact format if someone can already tell the story in a well organized article, containing all the necessary elements for a concrete narrative.



26. Post 66035450 (unedited backup) (by MusaMohamed) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 15:37:07 CET 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 02:18:29 PM
Hey man, I see you have posted a couple of times already here, but no luck. I will ask you to consider creating a scam accusation thread on the scam accusation board. Link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
On top of Scam accusation board, this sticky thread is about Scam Report Format (Use it to make scam reports properly). Posters must follow this format for their scam reports against any casinos or companies in order to save time of them and also readers who want to support their scam accusations.

Posting a thread without a proper format only wastes more time for asking and asnwering questions before changing it to a right given format for more easily follow up.