I’m glad I posted the outcome of my dispute with Bitz if it bothers people like you and brings you to using profanity.

You seem unable to distinguish between choice and duty. A business still has obligations even when a customer participates voluntarily. Your comment treats gambling as if it removes all operator obligations and reduces a casino’s only duty to paying winners. Under your logic, any attempt by a player to hold a casino accountable is automatically a “scheme.”

The casino industry does not support that position. Independent mediators do not support it. Casinos that take responsible gambling seriously do not support it.

Consider a simple example. A person walks into a bar already intoxicated and asks for another drink. Yes, the person chose to walk in. Yes, the person chose to order alcohol. The bartender still has a duty to refuse service. If the bartender keeps serving and harm results, the bar is liable. The customer’s choice does not erase the bar’s regulatory duty.

At the end of the day you can think whatever you want. You do not write the rules, interpret them, or enforce them. You are simply another forum user with an opinion. In this case, an opinion that was rejected by the documented record and by two independent mediators.

You and others repeat the tired line that a player would not complain if they made “handsome profits.” That argument misunderstands the entire issue. A casino’s obligations do not fluctuate based on the outcome of bets. The duty to enforce self-exclusion is triggered by written notice, not by whether wagers later win or lose. That is exactly why the mediators focused on the timeline rather than speculation about motives.

If you think the rule should be different, you are free to open a casino and try running it that way.

---

---

আসসালামু আলাইকুম আশা করি সবাই ভাল আছেন,  আবারো চলে আসলাম আর একটি নতুন মাসের একটিভিটি রিপোর্ট নিয়ে, তবে দুঃখজনকভাবে বলতে হয় যে এই ফেব্রুয়ারি মাসে আমাদের লোকাল  থ্রেডে ২০২২ সাল অক্টোবর মাসের পরে তিন বছরেরও বেশি সময় পর আবার আমাদের এই লোকাল থ্রেডের মেরিট অ্যাক্টিভিটি সবচাইতে কম দেখা গেল।
একটা সময় যেখানে বাংলাদেশ এবং পাকিস্তান এই দুই লোকাল থ্রেডকে লোকাল বোর্ড দেওয়া নিয়ে তুমুল আলোচনা হতো সেখানে এখন শুধুমাত্র পাকিস্তানকে নিয়েই আলাপ আলোচনা হয়। বাংলাদেশ অনেক পিছিয়ে গিয়েছে।

যাইহোক তারপরও আশা রাখতেছি যে আমাদের এই লোকাল থ্রেডে নতুন মানুষদের আবির্ভাব ঘটবে যারা এই লোকাল কমিউনিটির জন্য ভালো অবদান রাখবে যেমনটা আমরা দেখেছি ২০২৩ সালে।

সবশেষে যারা এ মাসে সর্বোচ্চ অ্যাক্টিভিটি করে বাংলা থ্রেডকে টিকিয়ে রেখেছেন তাদেরকে ধন্যবাদ জানিয়ে নিচে বিস্তারিত ডাটা গুলো চার্টের মাধ্যমে তুলে ধরা হলো।

---

ফেব্রুয়ারি মাসের  টোটাল পোস্ট হয়েছে           = 54টি

এবং  মেরিট ট্রানজেকশন হয়েছে                = 8টি


প্রথম তিনজন সর্বোচ্চ মেরিট অর্জনকারীঃ
Crypto Library   4
Review Master   2
Bd officer   1
Z_MBFM   1


প্রথম তিনজন সর্বোচ্চ মেরিট  সেন্ডারঃ
Xal0lex        3
Bd officer         2
Crypto Library  2
B2Z                 1

---

জানুয়ারি মাসের  টোটাল পোস্ট হয়েছে           = 79টি

এবং  মেরিট ট্রানজেকশন হয়েছে                = 53টি



প্রথম দশজন পোস্টদাতা
1. Bd officer: [17]
2. DYING_S0UL: [11]
3. Crypto Library: [7]
4. Shishir99: [7]
5. B2Z: [3]
6. Hridyansh Labs: [2]
7. Mahiyammahi: [2]
8. Btcloop: [1]
9. Comando65: [1]
10. Morshedbns: [1]



আজ পর্যন্ত বাংলাদেশ থ্রেডের সর্বোচ্চ ১০ জন পোস্টদাতাঃ

1. Crypto Library: [654]
2. Bd officer: [581] ⬆
3. God Of Thunder: [569] ⬇
4. DYING_S0UL: [540]
5. Little Mouse: [532]
6. Review Master: [389]
7. LDL: [367]
8. Z_MBFM: [263]
9. shasan: [245]
10. Shishir99: [235]

---

বাংলা থ্রেড এর একটিভিটি ওভার ভিউ
২০১৪ সাল থেকে শুরু করে ২০২৫ সালের অ্যাক্টিভিটি ওভারভিউ



জানুয়ারি মাসের অ্যাক্টিভিটি ২০২৬
ফেব্রুয়ারি মাসের একটিভিটি ২০২৬

এনাদের ক্রেডিট না দিলেই নয়
Ninjastic.Space -> TryNinja
Merit Dashboard -> DdmrDdmr  

---

---

---

It is pretty funny how you try to seem right while having an obvious criminal mentality.  Let me clarify something. The casino did not force you to make a deposit,  each and every deposit you made is something you did willingly and voluntarily. You know the nature of the game,  you know it is a gamble. If you decide to continue to throw large sums of money into a casino, it is a personal choice and a risk you decided to take.

I mean,  the casino was absolutely generous enough to give you some of your money back,  and you have to understand a casino giving you back some of your money does not mean they did something illegal.

It really does not make sense to come here complaining right after you took a very big risk.  If this is a repeated pattern of behavior across multiple casinos,  then it is intentional. Stop blaming the casino,  you should be responsible for your actions. You know the risks and you are taking advantage of gambling platforms.

The $11,500 USD I’ve been refunded in two legitimate complaints involving operators failing at their responsible gambling obligations is 0.002875% of the total deposits I’ve made across online casinos 2022-2026. Hope that helps with your unsubstantiated pattern/scheme theory.  You hope karma catches up to me sometime? Lol! This forum has so many 🤡’s.

Trust me if this is true then the user truly knows what he or she doing.  This might be a mistake if it happens once,  but if it keeps happening at a bunch of different casinos,  there's something fishy going on and there is nothing anyone can say to defend this kind of behavior and it's a criminal behavior.

Some of this tools in casinos are designed to be used in a way to try to keep yourself in control when a person is showing signs of gambling problems,  and not to just to create a “bet risk free” place.  If you are trying to take advantage of the system, on purpose by doing high odd bets,  and went to lay complain after you have lost the bet,  that raises serious questions about intent. Oh so if you had won the bet then you have withdraw your money quietly without making noise.  Some humans are very funny.

@ptaylor78 you say the mediators came to a decision in your favor which is fine. But that does not take away the pattern that people are referring to. If the system is working and you win,  then everything is fine.  If the system does not work and causes you to lose, then you go for it.  At some point,  people just need to take responsibility for their own actions.

Of course casinos have to try to protect their own and implement the measures properly.  But players should not be trying to use those measures in their favor.  I just hope that karma catches up with you one day.

This was not a dispute about losing bets. Self-exclusion was requested before any deposits were made.

This situation would not exist had the casino honored the initial written self-exclusion requests. The mediators reviewed those requests and rejected the casino’s stated reasons for denying them.

It concerned written responsible gambling requests that were not enforced. Two independent mediators reviewed the full record and ruled against the casino. A refund was issued.

Other dispute you referenced was also reviewed independently and resolved. They are separate matters and do not change the documented findings here.

My current gambling activity is not relevant to whether written self-exclusion requests were denied in this case.

If you believe the mediators were wrong, feel free to address their findings directly.

Speculation about motives does not change documented facts.

I usually place sports bets mainly on matches of my favorite team, despite winning most of the time, I place few bets, I also place some bets on random teams and take the odds into consideration, I mostly bet on the brazilian championship (brasileirão, paulista...) and other championships in my country, because I have a little more knowledge.

The only sport I follow regularly is football, but I'm getting a little interested in MMA, I recently made a double bet at another casino betting very little and I won a lot with that bet, it was a balance of dust I had. This bothers us, doesn't it? I wanted to get into MMA and follow along, because I had the first impression that I might have a certain skill in it, but we'll see...

In fact, their thoughts are quite strange. From the outside, they may seem random or incoherent. But if you observe them closely, you can guess what they want to do. When you can catch their stupidity, you will often laugh at their stupidity.

Yes, this was cleared up for me yesterday because I made a wager using that SATS yesterday. It was probably around 0.36 cents.
But unfortunately I couldn't make any big profit with it. I played chicken cross games and was able to go up to 3x and then my chicken  got mashed by car lol.
Still, I like the bonus that, it's real 0.36 cents and  it's free. 

They have had months to fix issues with their merchants or find new merchants to complete INR deposits for Indian users yet the drag their feet and are solving nothing, meanwhile more and more cases are piling up. How many other cases are there that we don't have a clue about?

So yes it is the merchants fault for not completing the transaction, but BC is still at fault for continuing to deal with the incompetent merchants they are using IMO. If the system they have isn't working and their customers are being scammed, why wouldn't they want to fix it?

May I beg to differ due to the reason I mentioned on my previous post?

IF a flag is from INR user, then it's quite likely due to FIAT transaction, one of which doesn't have a direct influence from BC, thus, unless the INR-user worded their thread very specifically, the one "being flagged" should be the merchant and flagging BC for INR FIAT depo [again, depending on the circumstances and how the thread conveyed] will be a wrong act.

If the flag was for cases that's internally and directly under BC's control like [urlhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573555.0]this[/url] or this, then yes, maybe it's time to get a red banner to fly high, with hope that it'll be a waking slap to BC's management.

Thanks for the information, each casino has its peculiarities, but the attraction of offering the lowest possible house edge is very good. I haven't created an account yet, how does the multi boost work in sports betting?

I'm testing new strategies, usually in sports betting, where I place small amount in bets with a good multiplier...

People are delusional if they invest in Bitcoin to get rich, because the time is gone for one to be able to potentially make life-changing profits from a Bitcoin investment, that was only possible for investors before 2015 or so, because only those who invested back then managed to get very high returns on their investments if they kept holding, but those who invest now or after this point onwards, they should only expect good profits, and good profit I mean like investing $500, and expecting maybe $2,000 or a bit higher than that in about 5 years or so, because is not at a price point where it can go 10x or 20x because that would require Bitcoin to have a valuation above $1m, which isn't a joke.

So, I think it is unrealistic for people to actually think that they can get rich from their Bitcoin investments, and this is the main reason why so many people go towards altcoins because they know Bitcoin is not going to make them significant profits, so they choose altcoins so that they can make good money from them, but we all know that most altcoins end up making everyone lose money, so it's better to just stick to Bitcoin and happy with whatever profits we make from it.

I think we need to consider to start tagging them as an unreliable business TBH. I have been trying to refrain from tagging them, but it's getting really close to that happening. At the very least some affected users from India region need to create a flag and it will get support.

Does anyone think BC cares about the forum at this point? Their rep seems to do nothing but twiddle his thumbs.

I agree with you, i also have come across some casinos where the smaller or decimal unit of bitcoin is referred to as bits and are often written in a whole number value, that is without any decimals and it's does confuse me at times, I usually will think it's an altcoin totally different from bitcoin, I will think it's the casinos own cryptocurrency.

But on casinos where the smaller or decimal unit of bitcoin which we all know and refer to as Satoshi is listed as Sats, such confusion as the above does not arise because we all are very familiar with sats, we know that any amount of bitcoin that is less than 1.0 is generally referred to as satoshi.

Fortunately or unfortunately, such people simply have nothing to think with; this forum sometimes observes a lack of gray matter.

Bitcoin cannot make anyone rich quickly, Investing with the intention of getting rich quickly is completely foolish. To be successful by investing Bitcoin, it is very important to first gain proper knowledge about Bitcoin, as well as to have knowledge about the existence of the market and to choose prudent money for investment. When we acquire proper knowledge, use prudent money and have knowledge about the volatility of the market, we will not be disappointed quickly by the existence of the market after investing, we will be able to buy Bitcoin with confidence and hold it, as a result of which we can expect profit in the long term in the future. Investing with the hope of quick profit can double the risk of losing money.

I think this quick funds is what is making some investors to make a wrong decision because I don't see any reason that will make some investors to think bitcoin risk is not good to take either long term holding or short term holding, if truly the investors have the knowledge of bitcoin and what it can bring out in the future, it will make majority of investors to invest more on bitcoin in this bearish season,  for those looking for quick way to make funds always fall victim to scammers in the community, and there is nothing you can use to stop them not to take the risk of what scammers has introduced to them because you will not have that time to convince them.

I was curious to visit this ANN and the duel.com website.

Does Duel.com offer any kind of weekly or monthly promotion, a type of betting tournament or anything like that?

The problem starts when the rounds or spins become unfavorable to your bet. Then you start betting double the amount of your initial bet to recover the lost amount and reset the bet on wins, in the case of a 50% or 55% probability of winning in some games with a high RTP.

Generally, when I bet a lot on games like dice, I always started well, but then, after a few negative bets, I see that I finished the game with a much lower value than I started with. 

Not really. Yes, it could happen, but on 1,000 spins that result, 55-45, is 0,017% likely (AI calculated). But I agree with the idea you express.

All of our games are fully operational and regulated by rtp and maxwin. You can log into our demo bot yourself and see for yourself. I can answer it, and it's not a problem for me, I'll send you a link to the demo bot in the telegram. https://t.me/ragespin_bot

They would respond only if such matter would be brought to mediators and the silence would be treated as something that would lower their score down

Some people know and some don't. There are also MLM (Multi Level Marketing) schemes where users are first asked to buy a package, and then invite other users to increase their own earnings. I have seen so many of such projects, and people invest so much money in them and also keep referring others to it. The majority among these users are internet illiterates who have joined the internet only to use social media platforms like Facebook so that they can upload their pictures daily and like and comment on others' pictures, but now they have heard people say that online earning is a thing, so they are always looking for opportunities, and when they are pitched such projects, they start imagining the good life they are going to have after they join.

So, a good number of people who get into such schemes and projects are the ones who are basically guided into them and they don't even know what they are. I have come across so many people who can't even answer the question that what does the project actually do to produce the profits that they share with you, because they know nothing about it, and they have just been told that they are going to make money if they invest, so they did it.

No, man.
Anyone trying to reach over 100k dollars and only with games which do not allow to aim for small multipliers is going to have their balance pretty much drained in less than a couple of hours.

Slots and third party casino games are supposed to force people to gamble as little as possible for the sake of making their session to last long enough so it can be enjoyable, there is no way to make all this OP plan viable if there are not games like plinko or dices available for people to try.

I would not be surprised it was not the case though, casinos are not in this business to provide easy money to gamblers, they are a business and they need to get their profits from somewhere, logically.