Last update: 2025-10-13_Mon_20.24h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Shishir99 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
nobody
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Shishir99" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 65918012 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 20:20:49 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
his claim of owning 0.63 btc is very likely an understatement.
1 - 1/e ≈ 0.63
If you know, you know.
I don't know

And it feels like I'm missing out on something good. What's with saying someone owns less than 1-1/e Bitcoins?
This should be interesting if e ~ [-0.01, -0.005]. If on the contrary, e = exp(1) (positive), then it's the same old boring 0.63 we've been reading about from way back.
I'm still lost

You're not supposed to use e as a variable with a different meaning in math. But I
still have no idea what this is about. I thought it could be an inside thing, I'm just not seeing it.
You casuals.

I use φ = (1+ Sqrt 5)/2 as the measurement tool for my lies about the quantities of my Bitcoin holdings.
Edit: I just got the joke. Lol. Clever.
@LoyceV:
It is a well known constant in math and his post was just a reference to that number.
Your accidental 80x never happened either, just like my "mistake" from a couple of years ago that caused a certain amount of bonus funzies based on my coincidentally being in the right place (a seemingly illiquid exchange) at the right time.
Edit: I just got the joke. Lol. Clever.
@LoyceV:
It is a well known constant in math and his post was just a reference to that number.
I know the math, but the joke still passes me.
If you had not realized, bots are challenged when it comes to jokes.
115k is better than 106k
maybe 125 by Thursday.
I think this time the price will go up to maybe $130k, but I have no doubt that some new bombastic announcement will do the same thing it did a few days ago. In addition, it is necessary to monitor what will happen in the event that the US approves the sending of Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine - there has been a lot of talk about this in recent weeks, and if it really happens, the situation will be quite aggravated in the relationship between the US and Russia.
If you had not noticed, in bitcoin, surprise price moves can happen to the upside or to the downside.
We never expect such death; nobody should commit suicide because of the crypto market movement.
A Ukrainian crypto trader has been found dead in Kyiv in the wake of a market crash, with officials now treating the incident as a possible suicide, according to local police. Konstantin Galich (better known as Kostya Kudo) was found inside a Lamborghini Urus in the Obolonskyi district of Kyiv Oct. 11 with a gunshot wound to the head. According to police reports, a firearm registered to him was also at the scene. A statement shared on the Kyiv Police Department’s Telegram channel said the focus was on establishing if the act was self-inflicted or involved foul play.
The statement said that a day before his death, “the man told relatives that he was feeling depressed due to financial difficulties and also sent them a farewell message.”

Read:
https://nypost.com/2025/10/12/world-news/ukrainian-crypto-trader-konstantin-galich-found-dead-inside-lamborghini-as-market-plunges/At the point he felt depressed and he was telling members of his family, they would have swinged into action to call him to order and give him some counsel and encouragement to calm him down, knowing fully well that his finances was affected due to the market crash. I think it was that tip off he told his family about him being depressed was how the police came to the conclusion that it was suicide the young man committed. He should have been familiar with the ups and downs of the market, the move he took was too extremely, he could still be alive and recover those money, hence there is life, there is hope.
I am not suggesting that suicide is the right answer, yet sometimes the level of debt could be quite insurmountable, when folks are using leverage they get wiped out and then perhaps they even keep trying to bet it and they get wiped out several times... Guys here have probably gone through some version of loss and/or extreme loss, and maybe they could recognize if one or two other things would have had happened, they would have had been in even a worse situation.. so in that regard, sometimes there can be some paths forward.
Edit: I just got the joke. Lol. Clever.
@LoyceV:
It is a well known constant in math and his post was just a reference to that number.
I know the math, but the joke still passes me.
I was just adding to the noise

Perhaps there was no joke. It still eludes you and me both...
i thought i had it figured. then i did an actual check of my theory and.. well, uh no. so i dont get it either now lol
edit
like, ever go to bed thinking how clever you were. then wake up and find out how unclever you were?
yes? ... then bitcoin is for YOU!
no?... then bitcoin is for YOU TOO!
In my very early years of bitcoin, there was one or two times, that I sold some bitcoin with the expectation of buying it back cheaper, and even though it should not be any kind of BIG deal, those were actually the most stressful times for me, so largely I stopped doing it. I concluded that there is no reason to sell bitcoin with an expectation of buying back lower.
At the same time, there are folks who lean towards being able to sleep better in cash and others who sleep better in bitcoin. Of course, there is a balance in regards to how much in bitcoin and how much in cash, and those who are newer to bitcoin might find it more challenging to get used to being able to sleep by having a certain amount of their value in bitcoin (and being able to "let it ride.").
[Edited out]
You are all Bitcoiners. You are clever by definition!
It was not really a joke (although you could call it that), but a guess. I postulated that Jay's "0.63 BTC" number may have come about after doing some price data calculations involving e (in a direct, or indirect way), so that's why the value of 0.63. Any one involved in electronics and/or applied math would likely have come across this number, which usually appears as 0.632 (with 3 decimals).
Gemini's quick response:
The value 0.632 (or 63.2%) is significant in the transient response of a first-order system, such as an RC or RL circuit, because it is the point in time where the system's output reaches approximately 63.2% of its final steady-state value. This time is equal to one time constant (τ) of the circuit.
Jay's recent comment on this suggests that I was wrong though, so, my apologies for twisting your brains with my math conundrums.
Your description was better, though.
We never expect such death; nobody should commit suicide because of the crypto market movement.
There were many in the last cycle. People tend to forget. Anyway you won't read about most of these cases are they would be unknown people.
My view...if 'reality' finally hits the stock market and it dumps say 25% in the next month as a cluster....k and the recession hits (as it should with all
the chaos in the world imho) then BTC will go down probably more than that at least initially. A recession means everyone is over extended...on cc and the 2nd
It is not gonna happen now maybe in a few years, they still have different ways of preventing this. Interest rates are coming down too. There is also a very good theory that this massive crash was an orchestrated attack on Binance.
https://www.cryptopolitan.com/hackers-used-binance-to-crash-crypto-market/Don't play with dangerous tools and you will be fine.
It's a good read. I will stay off binance.us for the time being.
I think that various aspects of the degeneracy have been happening on the regular Binance, and not on BinanceUS.. even though they are connected, regular Binance has more products - and also over the years, there have been decent amounts of attacks on Binance - including that matters around the FTX fiascos were framed as if Binance had caused and/or contributed to those fiascos, and the story is far from clear in regards to the various overlaps. Many of us likely realize that since around the time of CZ's incarceration, there were agreements that would allow more US government (whether dark government of not) to place its tentacles within various aspects of the Binance apparatus .. so that Binance would not necessarily seem as much of a threat as some of the various decentralized exchanges that are currently in the space and suffered quite a bit in the October 10 crashening.
A couple of days ago
Laura Shin interviewed a guy named Diogenes Casares, and he had a lot of decent insight regarding some of the craziness of the October 10 crashening.
2. Post 65917925 (unedited backup) (by Fortify) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 19:55:37 CEST 2025) in A Ukrainian crypto trader has been found dead in Kyiv:
Well, I have posted this in the WO thread, but I believe this case deserves a dedicated thread. People should never commit suicide doesn't matter the situation. It won't be hard for a grown man to make a few million dollars especially when he is esbalished already. We never expect such death; nobody should commit suicide because of the crypto market movement.
A Ukrainian crypto trader has been found dead in Kyiv in the wake of a market crash, with officials now treating the incident as a possible suicide, according to local police. Konstantin Galich (better known as Kostya Kudo) was found inside a Lamborghini Urus in the Obolonskyi district of Kyiv Oct. 11 with a gunshot wound to the head. According to police reports, a firearm registered to him was also at the scene. A statement shared on the Kyiv Police Department’s Telegram channel said the focus was on establishing if the act was self-inflicted or involved foul play.
The statement said that a day before his death, “the man told relatives that he was feeling depressed due to financial difficulties and also sent them a farewell message.”
Anyone who has control of vast amounts of crypto is going to be a target, even more so as the price creeps upwards and unless he did something particularly foolish with it - I wonder why he felt there was no reason to live. I know nothing about his circumstances or whether he was successful, but trading can be an extremely dangerous area so it's possible that he lost all his money. Anyone who can create a Binance account can call themselves a trader, so lets not act like it is some special skill to spend money on that activity, there will be very few people who are able to pull it off successfully and consistently. In this case there is no reason to think foul play was involved, unless someone can say that he had lots of crypto that has since disappeared.
3. Post 65917840 (unedited backup) (by philipma1957) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 19:33:43 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
We never expect such death; nobody should commit suicide because of the crypto market movement.
There were many in the last cycle. People tend to forget. Anyway you won't read about most of these cases are they would be unknown people.
My view...if 'reality' finally hits the stock market and it dumps say 25% in the next month as a cluster....k and the recession hits (as it should with all
the chaos in the world imho) then BTC will go down probably more than that at least initially. A recession means everyone is over extended...on cc and the 2nd
It is not gonna happen now maybe in a few years, they still have different ways of preventing this. Interest rates are coming down too. There is also a very good theory that this massive crash was an orchestrated attack on Binance.
https://www.cryptopolitan.com/hackers-used-binance-to-crash-crypto-market/Don't play with dangerous tools and you will be fine.
It's a good read. I will stay off binance.us for the time being.
4. Post 65917722 (unedited backup) (by BitHodlers) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 19:03:14 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
We never expect such death; nobody should commit suicide because of the crypto market movement.
There were many in the last cycle. People tend to forget.
My view...if 'reality' finally hits the stock market and it dumps say 25% in the next month as a cluster....k and the recession hits (as it should with all
the chaos in the world imho) then BTC will go down probably more than that at least initially. A recession means everyone is over extended...on cc and the 2nd
It is not gonna happen now maybe in a few years, they still have different ways of preventing this. Interest rates are coming down too. There is also a very good theory that this massive crash was an orchestrated attack btw.
https://www.cryptopolitan.com/hackers-used-binance-to-crash-crypto-market/Don't play with dangerous tools and you will be fine.
5. Post 65917339 (unedited backup) (by Review Master) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 17:45:13 CEST 2025) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
কিন্তু তার ২ ঘন্টা পরে যখন আমি আমার বন্ধুকে কল করি তখন সে বলে তোর নম্বরে স্প্যাম লেখা আসছে কেন ? আমি কিছু বুঝতে না পেরে আমার সেই সিমটি খুলে রেখেছি আর আমার সম্পূর্ণ ফোন ফ্ল্যাশ করে সবকিছু আবার নতুন করে শুরু করেছি। কিন্তু এর পরেও কি আর কোনো সমস্যা হওয়ার সম্ভবনা আছে ? আমি বুঝতেছি না এরপর আমি কি করবো ? আমার সম্পূর্ণ ফোন কি হ্যাকারের / স্প্যামারের নিয়ন্ত্রণে চলে গেছে ?
খুব সম্ভবত আপনি স্কামারের নাম্বারটির কল যেহুতু ধরেছেন, তাই স্কামার কিংবা স্প্যাম নাম্বারের লিস্টে হইতো আপনার নাম্বারটিকেও এন্ডরয়েড সিস্টেম থেকে স্প্যাম নাম্বার হিসাবে লিস্ট করেছে। কেননা এন্ডরয়েড সিস্টেম একটি থার্ড পার্টি কিংবা নির্দিষ্ট ডাটাবেস ব্যাবহার করে, ব্যাবহারকারীকে স্প্যাম নাম্বার সম্পর্কে অবহিত করে থাকে।
আবারও বলতেছি, কেমন প্রজেক্ট Binance Alpha তে আসবে সেটির উপরই নির্ভর করবে এয়ারড্রপ ভালো পাবেন কি নাহ। কিন্তু আমার কাছে mainnet এর যেকোনো প্রজেক্টের এয়ারড্রপই ভালো লাগে, যদিও এখন এয়ারড্রপের narrative পরিবর্তন হয়েছে। তবে আগামীতে কিছু প্রজেক্ট থেকে ভালো কিছু পাওয়ার অপেক্ষায় রয়েছি। আর Binance Alpha এর এয়ারড্রপের জন্য আপনার এবং বাকিদের শুভকামনা রঈলো।

আমি ভাই পারসোনালি ৩-৪ জনকে দেখেছি যে ১৫০ থেকে ২৫০ ডলার পর্যন্ত এয়ার ড্রপ ক্লেইম করেছে, এবং তারপর থেকেই তারা মাল্টি করাও শুরু করেছে এমনকি গ্রুপে দেখলাম অনেকে মাল্টি করার জন্য আলাদা ডিভাইস হিসেবে মোবাইল ক্রয় করে ফেলেছে।
ওমন সবাই করছে এবং অনেকে গত ২ মাসের প্রোজেক্টগুলো থেকে ভালো এয়ারড্রপ পেয়েছে যেমনটা বললাম Perp dex narrative এর জন্য এবং ওমন প্রোজেক্টগুলো লিস্ট হওয়ার কারণে। যাইহোক ভালো প্রোজেক্ট লিস্ট হইলে এয়ারড্রপ ভালো পাবেন, নইলে ওমন একটা ভালো এয়ারড্রপের আশা করা যাবে নাহ।
এখানে টেকনিক্যালি আমি কয়েকটা বিষয় দেখেছি যে-
ধরেন আপনার ব্যালেন্স ১কে এর ওপরে তাহলে আপনি ডেইলি দুই পয়েন্ট করে পাবেন 15 দিনে 30 পয়েন্ট এমনিই পাবেন।
আর তাছাড়া 15 দিনের যদি আপনি প্রতিদিন ৬৫ হাজার ৫৩৬ ডলারের উপরে ভলিউম রাখতে পারেন তাহলে ১৬ পয়েন্ট করে পাবেন।
তাহলে টোটাল 15 দিনে আপনার পয়েন্ট হবে ৩০+(১৬*১৫)= ২৭০ পয়েন্ট।
আর এটা দিয়ে আপনি যেকোনো একটি ভালো এয়ারড্রপ ক্লেম করতে পারবেন। দেখা যাক এখন আমার অবস্থা কি হয়।
টেকনিক্যালি এমন অনেক পরিকল্পনা আমিও করি, কিন্তু প্রোজেক্ট কিংবা মার্কেট পরিকল্পনার বারটা বাজাই দেয়। যাইহোক আবারও শুভকামনা সকলের জন্য যারা Binance Alpha এর চেষ্টা করতেছেন।
আপনি কি ভাই বাইনান্সের lauchpool এর কথা বলছেন?
নাহ, launchpool তো আলাদা । Binance Alpha এর জনপ্রিয়তার পর ওমন এয়ারড্রপও কিছু দিয়েছে, আমি যদি ভুল নাহ হয়ে থাকি। যাইহোক আমি বিষয়টা দেখেই জানাবো পরবর্তীতে।
আমার ক্ষেত্রে কয়েক বছর আগে এমনটা হয়েছিল যেখানে আমি একটি ক্র্যাক ডাউনলোড করতে গিয়ে হ্যাকিং এর শিকার হয়েছিলাম এবং সে ক্ষেত্রে আমার একটি গেমিং প্ল্যাটফর্মের অনেকগুলো একাউন্ট হ্যাকাররা এইভাবে বাইপাস করে তাদের এক্সেস এ নিয়ে গিয়েছে এখনো পর্যন্ত আর রিকভারি পারিনি।
আপনার পরিস্থিতি এবং ওনার পরিস্থিতিটা সম্পূর্ণ ভিন্ন। কারণ আপনি ক্র্যাক সফটওয়্যার ডাউনলোড করেছিলেন যেগুলোতে malware আগে থেকে থাকে এবং আপনি যখনে ওই ক্র্যাক সফটওয়্যার ইন্সটল করবেন। মেলওয়ারটা প্রথমে আপনার সিস্টেমের anti-malware কে বন্ধ করে আর আপনার সিস্টেম থেকে সব তথ্য নিয়ে নেয়।
আজকে একটা নিউজ দেখে অনেক বেশি হতাশ হলাম। ইউক্রেনের একজন ক্রিপ্টো ট্রেডার তার নিজের ল্যাম্বোরগিনির ভেতরে নিজের বন্ধুক দিয়েই আত্মহত্যা করেছে।
এটা পুরাতন খবর , কেননা এই ঘটনাটা মার্কেট ক্রাশের দিনে হয়েছে বলা যায় এবং আমি এটি
আগের পোস্টেই আপনাদের সাথে শেয়ার করেছিলাম।
6. Post 65916771 (unedited backup) (by coin-investor) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 15:29:49 CEST 2025) in A Ukrainian crypto trader has been found dead in Kyiv:
I hope this makes some sense. If people think it's not, then I will lock the thread. So your opinion is welcomed.
Some members or traders are not visiting the beginners and help sections, so I support the thread, but I respect other members' opinions if they think it should be locked.
On the discussion, if this is a suicide, I'm surprised that he would commit this terrible act based on the article
He co-founded the Cryptology Key trading academy and was an active influencer and strategist in digital asset markets.
He should understand the market movement, as this is not something new, and the community has seen this before; it's not the end of the market, it will eventually recover. We should just be patient. I guess this needs a deep investigation, as there are other causes that lead to his action.
7. Post 65916720 (unedited backup) (by Spaceman1000$) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 15:17:25 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
We never expect such death; nobody should commit suicide because of the crypto market movement.
A Ukrainian crypto trader has been found dead in Kyiv in the wake of a market crash, with officials now treating the incident as a possible suicide, according to local police. Konstantin Galich (better known as Kostya Kudo) was found inside a Lamborghini Urus in the Obolonskyi district of Kyiv Oct. 11 with a gunshot wound to the head. According to police reports, a firearm registered to him was also at the scene. A statement shared on the Kyiv Police Department’s Telegram channel said the focus was on establishing if the act was self-inflicted or involved foul play.
The statement said that a day before his death, “the man told relatives that he was feeling depressed due to financial difficulties and also sent them a farewell message.”

Read:
https://nypost.com/2025/10/12/world-news/ukrainian-crypto-trader-konstantin-galich-found-dead-inside-lamborghini-as-market-plunges/At the point he felt depressed and he was telling members of his family, they would have swinged into action to call him to order and give him some counsel and encouragement to calm him down, knowing fully well that his finances was affected due to the market crash. I think it was that tip off he told his family about him being depressed was how the police came to the conclusion that it was suicide the young man committed. He should have been familiar with the ups and downs of the market, the move he took was too extremely, he could still be alive and recover those money, hence there is life, there is hope.
8. Post 65916701 (unedited backup) (by Bd officer) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 15:12:49 CEST 2025) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
আজকে একটা নিউজ দেখে অনেক বেশি হতাশ হলাম। ইউক্রেনের একজন ক্রিপ্টো ট্রেডার তার নিজের ল্যাম্বোরগিনির ভেতরে নিজের বন্ধুক দিয়েই আত্মহত্যা করেছে। পরিস্থিতি যাই হোক না কেন, মানুষের কখনোই আত্মহত্যা করা উচিত না। একজন প্রাপ্তবয়স্ক মানুষের পক্ষে কয়েক মিলিয়ন ডলার আয় করা কঠিন হবে না, বিশেষ করে যখন সে অলরেডি নিজের পায়ে দাঁড়িয়ে গেছে। আমরা কখনই এমন মৃত্যু আশা করি না; ক্রিপ্টো মার্কেটের আপ ডাউনের কারণে কারো আত্মহত্যা করা উচিত না। নিউইয়র্ক পোস্ট এর তথ্য অনুযায়ীঃ
আসলে ভাই কেউ সহজে আত্নহত্যা করতে চায় না, কিন্তু হয়তো এমন পরিস্থিতির শিকার হয় তখন তাদের আত্নহত্যা করা ছাড়া কোন উপায় থাকে না। আমরা জানি আত্নহত্যা মহাপাপ, যা আল্লাহ মাফ করবে না।
হয়তো তিনি এমন মুদ্রায় বিনিয়োগ করেছিলো যা বিশাল ডাম্পিং হয়েছিলো, যার কারনে কোন উপায় না পেয়ে নিজেকে শেষ করে দিয়েছে। তাই ক্রিপ্টো ঝুকিপূর্ণ সম্পদ, তাই এখানে হারানোর সামর্থ্যর চেয়ে বেশি অর্থ বিনিয়োগ করা উচিত নয়, হয়তো তিনি তার সম্পদের বড় একটা এমাউন্ট বিনিয়োগ করে ফেলেছিলেন। যাইহোক, তার এই কাজটা করা মোটেও করা উচিত হয় নাই, তিনি অবশ্যই বেচে থাকলে যা হারিয়েছিলো তার চেয়ে বেশি ইনকাম করতে পারতেন। আল্লাহ সবাইকে বোঝার তৌফিক দান করুক, বিষয়টি খুবই দুঃখজনক ছিলো।
যাইহোক, ভাই এই ধরনের নিউজ কিন্তু আমাদের দেশের জন্য খারাপ দিক, কারন আমাদের দেশে এমনেতে ক্রিপ্টো নিষিদ্ধ করে রাখা হয়েছে, তাই যদি তারা এই ধরনের নিউজ দেখতে পায় তাহলে আরও কয়েক ধাপ পিছিয়ে হাটা শুরু করবে।
9. Post 65915893 (unedited backup) (by holydarkness) (scraped on Mon Oct 13 11:32:25 CEST 2025) in BC GAME SIX DEPOSITS AND ONE WITHDRAWAL STUCK:
I see that you've make your new thread instead. So... please lock the other one on top of marking it as resolved. The button to lock a thread is at the bottom left of
that thread.
I'll look into the details of your situation and reach my contact later, I have to get ready for IRL. Please wait a little
Once again, another case with fiat deposit and withdrawal stuck, and no help from the support. Another new case for holydarkness. I think I saw your previous case where holydarkness politely asked you not to make any more deposits while he was talking to BC game regarding your previous two deposits. [...]
That was other person, lol. I believe you're mistaken this one with
this one.
10. Post 65913912 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Sun Oct 12 22:02:55 CEST 2025) in Google showing fake Sponsored links before real Bitcointalk site:
Google automatically detected his location and suggested his local language, but he forgot to remove that part from the screenshot. Mate, why not search in Bangla? Creating mutiple account is allowed. So why are you trying to hide your identity?
Maybe he is actually from Nigeria and just chose Bangladesh serer on his VPN, therefore having Bengali on that screenshot.

Joke aside, he is obviosuly a merit farmer, but not a very good one since he didn't manage to farm a lot of merit before being exposed.
11. Post 65913852 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Sun Oct 12 21:47:25 CEST 2025) in Google showing fake Sponsored links before real Bitcointalk site:
I'll just add that the OP can think about trying the Tor browser, there are no such things there, so when you search for something through the search engine, you won't get some nonsense at the top of the search.
As you say, Google doesn't care too much about what kind of ads it shows as long as they make money that way. To me, it was always at least unethical behavior of such a large company, but then you realize that for them we are just ordinary numbers on which they profit.
I believe, for normal browsing TOR isn't the best choice. Because I do need my previous search history to search for relevant information when I visit the next time. But with TOR, I won't be able do achieve that. As you already know I use TOR, but for causal works, regular surfing I have been using Chrome, Mises, Firefox.
I would rather use an adblocker and be done with the sponsored ads.
Sorry for off-topic
snip....
Google automatically detected his location and suggested his local language, but he forgot to remove that part from the screenshot. Mate, why not search in Bangla? Creating mutiple account is allowed. So why are you trying to hide your identity?
He probably knew that Nigerian local is one of the most active locals and it has tons of active users. So it would be the perfect ground to fish for merit!
Lastly whenever I'm seeing something like this, I can definitely tell that its an alt account.

12. Post 65913078 (unedited backup) (by BitWinz) (scraped on Sun Oct 12 18:40:37 CEST 2025) in Bit Winz (Beta) - Free Faucet + 12 Provably Fair Games:
Welcome to the forum!
I must admit, the casino gives a Primedice vibe. It is suitable for you since Primedice is no longer operational, and its website is no longer functional. Check if you can grab the primedice domain. I am sure you will get some players from that domain. I see the website already has a chat feature. Do you have an auto-reply feature for rain in your chat? I think the auto rain bot, which runs every few minutes, keeps your community active.
Interestingly, you have an in-house slot game. I don't recall ever seeing any in-house slot games. The casinos mostly add third-party slot providers, such as Pragmatic Play slots, BGaming, and others. Do you plan to run any kind of promotion on the forum?
Hey Shishir99, thank you so much for the positive comments! We've worked very hard on this project and look forward to growing our community

We want to be unique and grow our own brand so we probably won't peruse buying the now defunct PrimeDice domain.

Rain had some minor bugs but we are fixing those bugs and will re-enable it very soon!

We aren't opposed to 3rd party slot providers but for now we need to grow a little. I think all 3rd party slot providers would laugh at us if we requested partnership with any of them.

Have a great day!
P.S. If you want 15 tokens (1,500/sats) @admin in our chat and I will hook you up!
13. Post 65911804 (unedited backup) (by Odinas1) (scraped on Sun Oct 12 12:55:31 CEST 2025) in Winna.com scam accusation - over 380k EUR of withdrawals declined:
Not sure what kind of "risk-free" gambling attempt do you see here, have you even read the accusation and proofs? Your comments make no sense at all, we are talking about multiple serious violations on casino side that have been proved, even them *partly* agreeing that they were at fault, and still I'm considered at blame for trying to gamble "risk-free"? Read my previous comments, I had no control over these declined withdrawals.
Do you think I am stupid?
Don't play over smart here. You know what I am talking about. You had no control over these declined withdrawals, and I agree with that. This is why the casino shares the blame. But you had complete control over your gameplay, where you gambled and lost the funds. Now, you are blaming the casino just because you lost the funds by gambling. You are not an innocent kid who doesn't understand anything.
The casino agrees that they were at fault, which is why they promised you some bonuses as an apology, but you already refused to receive them. So, they actually offered what they had to offer. Wear their shoes and you will understand what was your fault.
Well now as you said it, yes I do think so. Casino offered 75k locked under 100x wager requirement, if you think its them "offering what they had to offer", you either didn't read the thread or are stupid indeed. Please refrain from posting further useless comments.
It doesn't even matter if the maintenance was real or not at the end, it is not an excuse to return my withdrawals back to balance. Cool off period doesn't make sense with 0 balance and pending withdrawals (that were already confirmed).
But you
just said the withdrawals were returned to your balance.
And I'm not even sure how to react to you saying that them "operating illegally" (which was already confirmed) is non substantial or relevant - this alone has ground for a legal battle, and as history shows multiple casinos had to reimburse/pay fines because of just that - a quick google search will prove this if you don't believe my word.
What do you gain personally by launching a lawsuit against Winna over jurisdictional issues?
As per once again being attacked on my gambling habits, I will repeat for the last time, my accusations do not include the money that was lost when withdrawals were cancelled by me, I do take responsibility for my actions.
Fair enough. I think you're absolutely right that they shouldn't have put the funds back in your account during the maintenance period. However, you did gamble them away instead of waiting for the maintenance period to be over. So its gonna be real hard to convince anybody that you are entitled to these funds, because you could have had this happen to you instead:
Exact same boat as you, I had my withdrawals blocked, I gambled it all the way to $80k and now they refuse to pay out what I rightfully won.
Will be following this case to see what happens as there doesn't seem to be a valid reason why a payout would be rejected, at least not so far.
In the cases before, the fines paid by casinos that were operating ilegally were used to reimburse the affected people. Additionally, if it helps even one more person to avoid dealing with this Im more than happy. Winna.com is now blocked and unreachable from any ISP provider in Lithuania, but it is just the first steps that we are taking.
When trying to deal in a friendly manner with Winna, I had offered them a 50/50 split. However, instead of friendly negotiations, I was asked to do a kyc and then threatened to sue if I go public, therefore we will have to do this the hard way and I will go for a full reimbursement+legal fees.
Exact same boat as you, I had my withdrawals blocked, I gambled it all the way to $80k and now they refuse to pay out what I rightfully won.
I won the money in Mines.
Sad to hear this, I do recommend not listening to people here and instead seeking legal help, as the amount is significant enough, and we do start to see a pattern with Winna here. I have personally received messages from other people in the same boat as well.
14. Post 65909978 (unedited backup) (by Odinas1) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 22:21:43 CEST 2025) in Winna.com scam accusation - over 380k EUR of withdrawals declined:
That question has been answred multiple times with all the supporting evidences provided that were requested, at this point it is even uncanny how would one consider this a "non-scam" or "my own fault". It is crazy how the "fake" maintenance is the only violation that you see here, but choose to completely ignore all the other stuff.
You might be right about the fake maintenance, but you don't know for sure if it was fake or not. You don't have proof it was fake, thus that's not really grounds for anything here. I'm surprised you didn't ask for a self-exclusion or cooloff period.
https://winna.com/rgTo activate a cool-off period, please contact our customer support with your personal details and preferred time frame.
At some point you have to assume some personal responsibility for your actions. If I were you, I would just stay away from crypto casinos from hereon out.
Also, when complainants tack on stuff like "they operated illegally in Lithuania" its because the merits of their case aren't very strong to begin with. Pick one issue, hammer that issue by presenting solid evidence in your favor, and don't deviate from it until it is resolved, or you can't go any further with it. Too many complainants muddy the water of their case by bringing in tangential stuff not related to their actual issue.
It is actually the players' responsibility to control their own gambling habits.
It doesn't even matter if the maintenance was real or not at the end, it is not an excuse to return my withdrawals back to balance. Cool off period doesn't make sense with 0 balance and pending withdrawals (that were already confirmed). And I'm not even sure how to react to you saying that them "operating illegally" (which was already confirmed) is non substantial or relevant - this alone has ground for a legal battle, and as history shows multiple casinos had to reimburse/pay fines because of just that - a quick google search will prove this if you don't believe my word.
As per once again being attacked on my gambling habits, I will repeat for the last time, my accusations
do not include the money that was lost when withdrawals were cancelled by me, I do take responsibility for
my actions.
It's some obvious proof they denied withdrawals till OP lose the funds ain't some of you get to the point? A maintenance would stop also deposits. Do not blame OP for irresponsible gambling , they should let them withdraw then if OP is irresponsible, depo all back and lose is his problem.
As I said, the casino shares the blame here, of course. The casino isn't innocent, which is why they should send the player some compensation. But the player isn't innocent here either. If I had such a huge balance on my account, I would wait for weeks or even months to get my withdrawal and play somewhere else if I want. You can blame both parties here. But as I said, I see this as an attempt to risk-free gambling where the player makes a deposit, plays, and blames the casino if they lose it. While they will take the win happily without any complaint. Do you agree the fact that the player would never come here if he had a winning session?
Not sure what kind of "risk-free" gambling attempt do you see here, have you even read the accusation and proofs? Your comments make no sense at all, we are talking about multiple serious violations on casino side that have been proved, even them *partly* agreeing that they were at fault, and still I'm considered at blame for trying to gamble "risk-free"? Read my previous comments, I had no control over these declined withdrawals.
15. Post 65909506 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 20:13:14 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[...]I am very disappointed.
You are very greedy.
Will you still be very disappointed when Bitcoin dips to $1.0M from $1.4M in 2030?
Perhaps some people can never get enough, no matter what.
I know that you don't completely agree with the idea of luck, yet as long as we are not dead (or perhaps if we have (or had) at least a 4 year investment horizon when we got started), we are so damned fortunate to have had come across bitcoin and come to the realization that it was a place in which we could put value, and yeah, we did not know for sure that it was going to go up, but we considered it as a potentially promising place.
There are so many folks who either don't hear about bitcoin or if they hear about it, they do not recognize and appreciate it as an opportunity, which continues to be true to this day.
Some of us who have been in bitcoin for a while start to believe that the bitcoin trade is obvious, even if it may well be obvious to some of us, since even if there were advantages in being aggressive in our investments, those folks who were moderate and/or even conservative in their bitcoin investment, were still able to profit quite extensively, as long as they stayed somewhat consistent in their buying of bitcoin and erroring on the side of buying and HODLing it.
Sure, there are some guys who have been in bitcoin more than 6 years and still have costs in the $30ks to $50ks, so they might ONLY have 2.5x to 4x profits in their bitcoin holdings, yet there are quite a few of us who have costs per BTC that are quite a bit below $30k, even below $10k per BTC - which surely should have had allowed us to offset the debasement of the dollar and various other fiat currencies.
I suppose some of us have figured out various ways to maintain cashflow in our lives so that we don't feel any urgency to be cashing out much if any of our BTC, and I don't have any problem if guys want to make somewhat radical upgrades to their lifestyle - yet at the same time, it is probably healthier to try to figure out ways to gradually upgrade your lifestyle rather than radically upgrading, even if you are able to radically upgrade. Not everyone is going to agree with my viewpoint, that is for sure, and surely various aspects of a person's situation - even their age, might cause them to shoot for high aspirations that may well be contributing to extra stresses that may well not be necessary... but hey, to each their own.
Lucky I feel.. .
Hopefully no observers got liquidated during that flash crash.
It is problematic to be playing with leverage, even though surely, there are guys, even in these here parts, who choose to use leverage of some sort or another in their ways of dealing with bitcoin... and sometimes even more leverage than they can handle financially and/or psychologically.. and therefore, small dips can sometimes end up with fairly high magnifying effects.
Historically, it seems that we had much more volatility and even emotions. I recall a lot of time that "stay calm" used to be quite a common theme in these here parts.

You seem to think that the solution is to sell in order that you have more money in case the price falls..
Yet if you are merely investing within your income then you just keep investing no matter what, whether the BTC price falls or not.
sure, you could hold back some of your buys, so that you are only buying with half of your income, so if the price goes down, you have some money saved up, yet you might end up saving up way more than you need, and then the price does not end up going down, and so you end up with too much fiat when you should have had been buying bitcoin all along.. which seems to be your issue already, if you had not been buying steady since early 2017, so you still have not figured out your mistake and you keep repeating it by failing/refusing to ongoingly, regularly, persistently, consistently and perhaps even aggressively buy (of course, within your already existing discretionary income, whatever that might be). Another thing is trying to figure out ways to increase your discretionary income by increasing your income and/or by cutting your expenses, and maybe trying to reach an accumulation rate that is greater than 15% of your income. or some other kind of large number that is also reasonable.
Everything started making sense, LOL.
Hopefully. You are still in a good place, even if it is taking you a long time to figure out that the key to bitcoin is to keep stacking until you reach some acceptable version of overaccumulation status. There are surely a lot of guys who prematurely conclude that they have reached overaccumulation status based on concerns that the prices are continuing to go up... Yet, part of our recognition should still be that so many normies still don't know what the fuck bitcoin is, even though some of them think that they do based on their having had heard the word, "bitcoin."
Well, FYI - I am not investing all my income in Bitcoin.
You are reading me (my post) wrong. I was merely trying to suggest that some guys can ONLY invest from their income since they either do not have anything saved (and/or they do not have liquid places in which they could draw upon to invest in bitcoin), so they can only invest from their income as their income comes in.. .. and they might not even be able to draw from their income in advance because they either have bad credit, no collateral and/or insufficient credibility in terms of their ongoing income continuing to come in (not that I consider borrowing against your future income to be a good idea, especially for people who are already with questionable credit worthiness or questionable future cashflow and/or back up ways to pay the loan in case the investment goes to zero or does not adequately perform).
I actually cannot afford to do that. I mainly save my signature earnings from the forum and keep that in Bitcoin. I sell some portions from here to cover my pocket expenses, and I have a real-life job to cover my family expenses. That is how I have been doing so far. But I sometimes sell more from my holdings to buy new gadgets and devices. Probably, I am doing it wrong because I am following these trends. I could save them if I wanted.
You are in the best position to judge any places in which you are able to increase your income and/or cut your expenses, and so surely it is good that you have figured out various ways to earn bitcoin and to transact with bitcoin, and so that puts you at a certain advantage over folks who still have not yet learn those kinds of aspects of bitcoin.
You likely have had a bit of a problematic mentality when it comes to bitcoin, in terms of your inclinations to spend it without replacing it, and sure, I understand if some of your income is coming from bitcoin, there may well be times in which your various basic expenses exceed your income, so you have to figure out from some places in which to draw from various resources that you have in order to cover the various basic expenses, which is part of the reason that guys will keep various back up funds so that they have cash cushions to cover their expenses when things are not going well or maybe even in times that they might have made some mistakes in their calculating of their income versus their expenses.
No one can really tell you how to manage your funds and/or how much to emphasize accumulating bitcoin, since level of aggressiveness (or priorities) and/or levels of whimpiness are within your own choices including your putting some efforts in to identifying the value of bitcoin as an asset and/or as a vehicle to both present and future empowerment (empowerment with the potential of having of more options).
We all got rekt again

I wish I had some fiat to buy back again.
A so far 13% correction is hardly anything to pay attention to, and sure guys are in different phases of their bitcoin investment journey, and so you have to figure out where you are on the spectrum of accumulation, maintenance, liquidation or some combination of those and perhaps some priority to one or another depending.. and guys who are in their earliest years into bitcoin will be at various stages of accumulation, so as their bitcoin stash grows they may well find themselves to start to transition into some aspect of the next stage up, yet it still can take guys well over 10 years to get through their accumulation stage, especially if they are building their bitcoin ONLY from their income and they don't have other places in which they can reallocate into bitcoin or other ways to front load their bitcoin without engaging in unnecessary risks.
Maybe I am a bit too conservative, sometimes, yet it seems to me that there are ways to invest that are mostly focused on building and not taking too many chances of a lot of things potentially going wrong and/or devolving into trading and/or gambling rather than investing. There are a lot of guys who seem to mix up trading and investing, and sure there are ways in which trading/investing overlap, yet at the same time, some guys seem to wrongly conclude that with bitcoin they need to transition between buying and selling their bitcoin in order to hopefully build their bitcoin stash in a more rapid way... yet frequently trying to rush an investment (like bitcoin) might either contribute to opposite results or even hinder the building process in unnecessary ways.
It seems that you might need to just ongoingly focus on building your bitcoin, and if you sell any bitcoin that you have, then spend and replace them in a fairly short period of time, yet you likely have to rethink what targets you are trying to reach.. so for example, if your current income is $20k to $30k, yet you were shooting for something like a $40k per year income that could be completely supported by bitcoin, then from my point of view,
right now you would need right around 7.455 BTC or more to reach that threshold of being able to perpetually draw $40k per year and with a 7% per year optional income increase.
Even if you currently do not have 7.455 BTC, and maybe you ONLY have 1.5 BTC (which it seems that you don't even have that much, even though you have been in registered on this forum since early 2017)... but let's say that you were to either have 1.5 BTC or able to accumulate that amount by 2031, then perhaps
by 2031, 1.5 BTC would be enough to support a perpetual income of $40k per year with 7% annual increases.
Of course, projections of future prices are not guaranteed, yet it still can be helpful to have some ballpark ideas about where we are at (how did we get here should be more concrete) and where we think that we might be able to go. None of this is guaranteed. We do our best based on our circumstances as they are and what we realistically might consider to be within our capabilities, and sometimes we will end up in a better situation than we had expected ourselves to be, which has been the case with quite a few folks who have been in bitcoin for a long time and who have stayed focused on accumulating and mostly holding their bitcoin.
16. Post 65909469 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 20:02:43 CEST 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
i agree, if someone is gonna gamble on a crypto casino, they should stick to using crypto.
They should.
But in reality, people use crypto casinos as they like. I don't have anything against them. But there is a possibility of getting scammed by those merchants. In most cases, the players cannot even report it properly to the casinos. Usually, casinos do not believe the customers. They believe their merchants. I have seen cases where the fiat withdrawal was marked as paid, but the user didn't receive their withdrawal.
The player reaches out for support, but the support team is unable to assist them, stating that it was released from their casino and they cannot take any further action. These issues can be escalated with the help of third-party mediators only. So, I would always avoid using fiat if possible.
besides the selective scams, it can get really ugly for both the users and the merchants.
if i remember correctly, there was a case in turkey where they arrested a bunch of people and the CEO of one of the biggest online payment platforms there for facilitating illegal gambling operations and payments.
i think they were using thousands of regular people accounts without their knowledge to move all the money around, it was a huge case.
For example - see this post.
This is unfair i deposit 50k INR
Money has debited from my bank but I didn’t received in my bc game account
I raise a ticket but they ask me for verification I tried but verification failed
I try many times contact to
recovery@bcgame.comBut there has no response i want my deposit and kyc completed please
Ticket id of my deposit: 9005131
My game id : 16010528
Please solve my problem
you can't make this shit up, right as we are talking about it, it happened to someone (again).
17. Post 65909133 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 18:46:43 CEST 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
Hey TryNinja,
I've been checking your web notification for a while. I appreciate your tool. I have been using the other one for a year or so, but moved to Ninjastic because of your web notification feature. I think it was perfect last week, but the arrow button on the screenshot no longer opens in a new tab. I'm not sure if I was using the control button all the time. But I think the link should open in a new tab so we don't have to keep pressing the control button.

It used to open in a new tab by default, but @LoyceV evangelized me on the art of "let the user decide".
Same tab = just click
New tab = middle mouse button OR ctrl + click
New window = shift + click
And I think I agree with him.

18. Post 65908019 (unedited backup) (by leo996) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 13:54:13 CEST 2025) in Winna.com scam accusation - over 380k EUR of withdrawals declined:
It's some obvious proof they denied withdrawals till OP lose the funds ain't some of you get to the point? A maintenance would stop also deposits. Do not blame OP for irresponsible gambling , they should let them withdraw then if OP is irresponsible, depo all back and lose is his problem.
As I said, the casino shares the blame here, of course. The casino isn't innocent, which is why they should send the player some compensation. But the player isn't innocent here either. If I had such a huge balance on my account, I would wait for weeks or even months to get my withdrawal and play somewhere else if I want. You can blame both parties here. But as I said, I see this as an attempt to risk-free gambling where the player makes a deposit, plays, and blames the casino if they lose it. While they will take the win happily without any complaint. Do you agree the fact that the player would never come here if he had a winning session?
I 100% agree on that. But that's not a excuse for the casino.
19. Post 65907939 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 13:22:43 CEST 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
I think the link should open in a new tab so we don't have to keep pressing the control button.
That's what your middle mouse button is for (or both at once on a touchpad): "open in new tab".
20. Post 65907045 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sat Oct 11 07:38:49 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:

A great chart I came across on X. Author listed on the image. I think this is what we’re all expecting to see…
I am expecting something like this below -

Seems a bit bearish, but sure, it could happen.
And, if you end up being wrong? and there is more upside than what you are expecting, then is your bitcoin stash going to still be o.k. ? meaning that you had not going to have regrets that you sold too much too soon.
And, golly gee whiz, I am nearly ready to propher a bet that you are not correct, especially the bottom.
Right now, I am willing to do a 50/50 bet that we will never see sub $80k ever again (meaning until the end of 2027).. and your bottom seems to be bringing us into the lower $70ks or the upper $60ks.. which seems problematic.
It also seems problematic to have so much of a down without first having a blow off top, and you are ONLY expecting a blow off top in the ballpark of $150k - perhaps with a bit of leeway to allow up to $200k, and imagine if we ONLY get a blow off top of $200k, how are you going to get below $80k or even below $100k with those kinds of whimpy blow off tops... You seem to be expecting blow-off tops for ants.. which there might be something wrong with your thinking if that's all you are perceiving to be likely from my lil precious.
I understand that we have BIGGER players coming into the scenes and using financial tools to manipulate bitcoin, yet we also cannot be sure that their attempts to manipulate bitcoin might not come flying into their faces.. and then they are stuck trying to figure out which kinds of injustices to perpetuate regarding who will be getting bail outs and who not? but that does not necessarily mean that we get down without up..
When (...)
.. and I believe that this probability of bitcoin hitting 100k can reach zero
You are saying that bitcoin will never reach $100k ever again?
That is a bit bold.
Does that mean that you would be willing to give 99% odds in a bet?
_In all existing markets on exchanges around the world, the only one that has 24/24 hour trading, and with fans for both the price to rise and the price to fall, is Bitcoin!
I still don't know any market that has this crowd... if you know, you can tell me..
So, based on this crowd, I see this... people hoping for the price to fall while others, the majority, hoping and waiting for the price to increase... This is the one that is always getting it right, because no matter how much the price falls, it always recovers, rises, and shatters the expectations of both those who were hoping to rise and those who were hoping to fall, and then, it no longer returns to that lower price that it was and maintained for a period.
So, I'm not saying that the price will never reach 100k again, just saying that the odds decrease every time the price moves away from 100k, which was different when it was below 100k, those who hoped for it to reach 100k were rewarded, and those who hoped to come back to 10k were disappointed, and these are the same ones who are now hoping for the price to return to 100k.
and these may be deceptioned again. And the funniest thing, that those who now hope for the price to reach 100k now, are the same ones who said that the price would not reach 100k.
-No, I wouldn't bet on 99% of this happening, but I see the chances of him reaching 1M starting to be higher as the price doesn't reach 100k, and if he reaches and or even loses 100k, it's getting harder and harder, and when he recovers, the chances of him not coming back at 100k will practically double, thus increasing the probabilities of it reaching 1m in five, 6 years, since the proportion of the spread of the price scale is exponentially increasing, since the last ATH are with less volatility than the previous ones.
Historically, we have experienced 70% to 90% corrections in bitcoin, yet those level of corrections have tended to have some kind of a blow off top prior to the correction, and perhaps the 2021 blow off top might have had been the smallest with only around 16.5x, if we count from $4,200 in April 2019 to its November 2021 top at $69k.
I understand that even I pick somewhat random numbers as what I consider to be the base starting out price.
For this cycle, I am considering our starting off point to have had been around $27k in October 2023, and so if we use $27k as our starting out point, so far we have ONLY had right around a 4.7x price appreciation (up to our so far top of $126,272). Personally, I can hardly imagine getting a 70% correction from that so far level of a blow off top, so in some sense, it seems to me that we are needing much more blow-off-toppedness in order to get some kind of a meaningful correction, yet $100k, and even $80k are stil potentially in jeopardy, so I am not really disagreeing with your thesis that sub-$100k becomes much less likely the further above $100k that we get, yet we have to get a whole hell of a lot more distance above $100k before it we can start to rule out the testing of $100k or even sub $100k.. and historically, we have had all kinds of corrections that have been 50% or greater.. so it is probably better that you don't start counting your chickens (from your eggs) too soon in regards to our being safe from going below $100k, until perhaps we get at least to $200k.
Sure, you might be correct. Maybe we are getting enough of a price cushion above $100k and sub $100k will never be reached, again, yet it just seems way too presumptuous and premature to to be proposing that we are getting safer and safer from having $100k to be tested.
And think about it.
we don't get to a point in which a 70% no longer touches $100k until we get to $333k, so you also seem to be being too presumptuous if you are saying that we are not going to have anymore 70% (or more) corrections until after we go above $333k. Can you see how you are just overly wishing when you seem to be writing off sub $100k before the BTC prices at least get into the upper $200ks?
You still might end up being correct, and we never see sub $100k again and/or we don't have $100k tested, yet that seems to be to pie in the sky hopeful, even if I am ongoingly telling people to be preparing for up and not be waiting for down before they buy (and stack up on) BTC.
You're missing the point: you asked if you should sell now and buy back later. My point is: nobody can tell you that.
Well, it makes sense.
I was asking what OG people do in such a situation. I understand that I will have to make my own decision based on what I think. But opinions from others actually help me understand what I should avoid. I am not planning to sell all my Bitcoin at this moment since I hold a very tiny amount of Bitcoin. I just want to make sure I have some fiat to invest during the bear market, or at least when the market goes down.
I hope this cycle won't end before we reach 150K. So I am not afraid of bearish market at this moment.
You seem to think that the solution is to sell in order that you have more money in case the price falls..
Yet if you are merely investing within your income then you just keep investing no matter what, whether the BTC price falls or not.
sure, you could hold back some of your buys, so that you are only buying with half of your income, so if the price goes down, you have some money saved up, yet you might end up saving up way more than you need, and then the price does not end up going down, and so you end up with too much fiat when you should have had been buying bitcoin all along.. which seems to be your issue already, if you had not been buying steady since early 2017, so you still have not figured out your mistake and you keep repeating it by failing/refusing to ongoingly, regularly, persistently, consistently and perhaps even aggressively buy (of course, within your already existing discretionary income, whatever that might be). Another thing is trying to figure out ways to increase your discretionary income by increasing your income and/or by cutting your expenses, and maybe trying to reach an accumulation rate that is greater than 15% of your income. or some other kind of large number that is also reasonable.
21. Post 65904584 (unedited backup) (by leo996) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 17:31:08 CEST 2025) in Winna.com scam accusation - over 380k EUR of withdrawals declined:
There's no reason why both things can't be true at the same time. The player has a responsibility to control themselves and the casino has a responsibility to adhere to the standards of their license.
I agree.
However, when I see a scam accusation like this, where the player used the money to gamble at a casino and then blames the casino after losing the money, I feel like they are trying to scam the casino. Yes, the casino shares some blame here, but the players aren't entirely innocent victims. They chose how to use their funds, and it is their own responsibility. The player would never come to this forum with a complaint if they were able to multiply their balance by gambling successfully. I hope my point makes sense.
In such cases, I expect the casinos to offer some kind of bonus as an apology. However, if they send the funds to the player, he would create another account and repeat the same thing. So, this will turn out to be a risk free gambling. Make a deposit, withdraw if you win. In case you lose, blame the casino for it. Repeat the same again. This is bullshit in my opinion.
There's no excuse for the casino rejecting 400+ withdrawal. It's some obvious proof they voided it till OP lose the funds ain't you get to the point?
22. Post 65904440 (unedited backup) (by Zwei) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 16:58:19 CEST 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
~ and as far as i know, online gambling got banned in india some time ago, so why would anyone from there even withdraw money linked to gambling to their bank account, you are just asking for trouble doing that.
i also have no idea why bc.game still supports indian fiat withdrawals, it's in their best interest and their users if they just remove it.
This isn't about BCgame only. Most of the casinos haven't taken any action to restrict Indian users from playing on their platform. Many of them still accept the fiat deposits from Indian users. You know it very well that gamblers don't really care much about the law as long as they get the opportunity to play on a platform without any difficulties. And it is hard for them to avoid the habits of gambling. In that case, casinos should take the steps here to prevent users from India.
i think the gambling ban is stupid tbh. like you said, people are gonna gamble anyway, and it's clear most of those casinos have no plans of exiting the indian market (there's a lot of money to be made there).
so maybe not restrict indian players outright, but they should at least disable fiat deposits and withdrawals.
I really liked the steps of Yolo Group casinos, they have disabled the accounts of Indian users already. BCgame and Stake will lose a large number of users if they take such steps.
apparently they are exiting gray markets preparing to target licenses in the middle east, at least that's what i saw in a tweet by noah from shuffle, and it does make sense.
As for fiat withdrawal, I think everything is fine as long as you are not the victim. But you never know who is next. I have seen a couple of cases and I want to avoid fiat transactions.
i agree, if someone is gonna gamble on a crypto casino, they should stick to using crypto.
23. Post 65904206 (unedited backup) (by acroman08) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 15:54:31 CEST 2025) in sportbet.one has scammed me of 3000USDT:
It is sad that they do not respond to you.
Since their forum account is banned here, they couldn't respond to you here. It is good to see that they have created a new account and an unban appeal thread on Meta -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5561913.0, Unfortunately, the moderators take long time to verify the data and to recover the account. So nobody knows when they are going to get back their account. Unfortunately, they are not allowed to response you here or post anywhere with their new account since it will be considered as ban evasion.
I just saw this. Sadly, it looks like their account got compromised and posted a malware/suspicious link, which got their account banned. I don't even know if the account will be restored.
Instead of asking for their compromised account to be restored, they should ask if another representative of their casino could create another account for their casino's ANN thread and tackle the issue involving their casino.
24. Post 65903700 (unedited backup) (by noormcs5) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 14:00:19 CEST 2025) in ⚽️ SportBet.one - decentralized sports-betting platform ⚽️:
It's very good that this scammer was blocked and disappeared from this forum, I hope he never comes back here and the topic of his fraudulent casino should also be banned because the casino is 100% scam, and it would be best if this company was completely closed down and the owner went where he belongs, i.e. it's prison.
They got banned for a different reason. Their account got hacked, and the hacker was spreading malware on the forum, which is why the moderators banned their account. For your kind information, they have now created a ban appeal thread on the forum, and there is a possibility they will get unbanned soon. You should not celebrate their ban because this will not benefit anyone, not the players, nor the sportsbook.
This is a forum with freedom of speech, and you can say anything about their platform. They cannot delete your opinion. If players come and post complaints, they will be able to address the scam accusations and probably solve them as well.
If the account got block because he was spreading malware then I don't think it should get unbanned even if there is in a appeal thread. Yeah I understand that anyone can operate any scam service and make an ann thread and they won't get blocked on Bitcointalk but spreading virus is against the policy and let's see what comes the outcome of this ban account.
25. Post 65901941 (unedited backup) (by nutildah) (scraped on Fri Oct 10 01:44:55 CEST 2025) in Winna.com scam accusation - over 380k EUR of withdrawals declined:
That question has been answred multiple times with all the supporting evidences provided that were requested, at this point it is even uncanny how would one consider this a "non-scam" or "my own fault". It is crazy how the "fake" maintenance is the only violation that you see here, but choose to completely ignore all the other stuff.
You might be right about the fake maintenance, but you don't know for sure if it was fake or not. You don't have proof it was fake, thus that's not really grounds for anything here. I'm surprised you didn't ask for a self-exclusion or cooloff period.
https://winna.com/rgTo activate a cool-off period, please contact our customer support with your personal details and preferred time frame.
At some point you have to assume some personal responsibility for your actions. If I were you, I would just stay away from crypto casinos from hereon out.
Also, when complainants tack on stuff like "they operated illegally in Lithuania" its because the merits of their case aren't very strong to begin with. Pick one issue, hammer that issue by presenting solid evidence in your favor, and don't deviate from it until it is resolved, or you can't go any further with it.
It is actually the players' responsibility to control their own gambling habits.
FALSE the house has a direct duty and depending on which license they hold will depend on which responsibilities they have.
There's no reason why both things can't be true at the same time. The player has a responsibility to control themselves
and the casino has a responsibility to adhere to the standards of their license.
26. Post 65901282 (unedited backup) (by SupItsJTTV) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 22:30:25 CEST 2025) in Winna.com scam accusation - over 380k EUR of withdrawals declined:
It is actually the players' responsibility to control their own gambling habits.
FALSE the house has a direct duty and depending on which license they hold will depend on which responsibilities they have.
In addition to these Safe Gambling restrictions, they also almost always contain clauses where errors and bugs almost always will void all bets. If a cashout is requested and then is delayed due to any reason, there is no reason to return the requested transfer to the players account. The request is still a valid one in any instance and should remain in review until fulfilled or the players account is restricted from logging in. If the player is awaiting further document verification they also should not be allowed to conduct any more bets.
But as you can see, OP already declined to receive the compensation. I assume it is because OP wants full refund of the funds, which he lost by gambling himself.
You assumed correct because the player is entitled to the full amount. Any admission of error voids all bets.
27. Post 65900603 (unedited backup) (by Little Mouse) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 19:06:50 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] Gamblr.io Casino Review Campaign | $40 Reward:
New accepted paerticipants
UserU
Shishir99
Deadline for you- 10/15/25
We are CFNP now.
Payment will be made together soon.
28. Post 65900546 (unedited backup) (by hyudien) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 18:53:38 CEST 2025) in BC.Game-🔴🔴🔴BET RED IN CRASH!🔴🔴🔴 Find More Unique Games!:
Dang man,
I don't know how much they are worth when converted into USD, but they look good. I mean, I love seeing the big numbers. They always amaze me, which is why I also enjoy playing games in RUB and other currencies, if available. But when it comes to making deposits and withdrawals in fiat, I am out. I don't like doing transactions in fiat at any casinos. There are a lot of problems with the merchants of the casinos, which you can see if you frequent the scam accusation board. BC game happens to have some scammer merchants and I don't want to fall in these scams.
It's quite a decent amount, around $233 if converted to USD, even that amount is enough to support your family (wife + children) for one month if you live in my country, and if we talk about deposits and withdrawals in local currency, from my experience playing at BC I didn't encounter any problems, even the withdrawal time was very fast compared to local sites that I often use, maybe because the withdrawal amount is not too much so there are no obstacles.
29. Post 65900541 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 18:51:43 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] Gamblr.io Casino Review Campaign | $40 Reward:
Gamblr.io Username- Shishir99
Merit Earned(lifetime)- 515
BTC Segwit Addy- bc1qzttaatxpk60dtxex7g830tea3m9uq3fuvknmrh
30. Post 65900482 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 18:36:25 CEST 2025) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
I've been slacking with these overviews for quite some time, publishing them at the end of the month, so this time I've decided to do it a bit earlier for a change. As always, all charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr
Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja
Ninjastic Space.
Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards.
Post activity per local board during September 2025Increase of activity in Nigerian board continues, from 3812 posts in August to 4255 in September, making it their new all time high. At the same time, majority of the other very active local boards had decreased activity, and that's something that is going on for a while.
Generally speaking, no surprise that total amount of posts written across local boards dropped from 13107 in August to 12612 in September.
Active members per local board during September 2025During the last month, 1292 members wrote at least one post in one of the local boards, which is a decrease compared to August (1344).
While in August Russian board still had more active members than Nigerian board, this changed in September and now Nigerian is finally topping this chart as well, and the difference will probably keep increasing. All the other local boards are far behind the others, with mostly decreased number of active members compared to month before.
Local board members per amount of posts during September 2025When it comes to the members who wrote only 1 post, Spanish is the leader with 54% of such members, while Pakistan local had only 12% members in that bracket.
In the 2-9 posts bracket, Polish the leader with 60%, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage of such members (21%)
Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, Nigerian and Portuguese local boards ahsred the 1st spot with 47%, while French had only 6% of members in that group.
Merit shared per local board during September 2025During September, 8922 merit was shared acorss local boards, which is a decrease compared to month before (9258). Even the record high 2964 merit that was shared in Nigerian board didn't help, which is due the fact that many of the other active local boards had decrease of merit in that period. It will be inreersting to see whether Nigerian local breaks the 3k merit shared mark, something that hasn't been broken in local boards since the early merit days, back in 2018 in Russian board.
Merit/Post ratio per local board during September 2025 The average merit per post across local boards was 0.7, the exactly the same as in August. Once again Romanian is at the top, and this time with even higher ratio than month before, and again followed by German board while this time Italian board is 3rd instead of Spanish.
Merit senders and receivers per local board during September 2025During September, 582 members sent while 656 received merit. Nigerian local board dominates this board as well, with the diference that hasn't been seen in a long time.
Percentage of merited posts across local boards during September 2025I thought that 100% of merited posts in Romanian board was just an anomaly, but they almost managed to achieve that 2 months in a row while Polish board also had a very high percentage, but its no so weird given their amount of posts. What is a surprise though is Italian board, given their pretty good overall activity (that was lower than usual in the last few months).
Merit per transaction across local boards during September 2025This month German board is at the top having which is not the surprise given their high merit per post ratio, but French and Greek definitely are.
The most active members per local board during September 2025Last but not the list in this monthly overview, list of the most active members per local board. joker_josue from Portuguese board remained at the top with 144 posts, while executijere and mandown from Turkish board are at the 2nd and 3rd spot with also respectable 140 and 124 posts. GG guys, keep it up!
31. Post 65898439 (unedited backup) (by Searing) (scraped on Thu Oct 9 08:29:37 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
You're missing the point: you asked if you should sell now and buy back later. My point is: nobody can tell you that.
He should sell it all and see if he is the new mindrust. Or if he was smart
Frankly I would not sell any large amount/percentage of my coin right now.
I will only sell when I really need to because I learned a long time ago that being your own bank is a great advantage, not a disadvantage, as at least 95% of people in the world apparently think.
Another reason (as if we needed one)to dump apple products. Fucking uk government
https://cryptoslate.com/will-apple-allow-government-access-to-bitcoin-private-key-backups-via-80m-icloud-backdoor/"The United Kingdom is weighing measures that could compel Apple to provide access to some iCloud data, raising a precise question for crypto users who keep wallets on iPhones and Macs.
If device backups and common file stores lose end-to-end protections in the UK, seed phrases and private key material can more easily move from a user’s device into locations where lawful process, or a Technical Capability Notice, can reach them."
Disclaimer: I have never owned any apple shit,only for work 😑
I have multiple core wallets on various macminis I do not use the cloud for backups.
I do not have any phone wallets or tablet wallets. So I think that my shit is safe.
also very little coin on the wallets.
It never occurred to me to use clouds, emails or similar things to store my backups - most of my coins are on air-gapped wallets with the seed/s and passphrase/s separated in different locations.
trezors and seeds are good.
I do have a decent amount on PayPI
as I want some simple easy pain free kyc coin in case of an emergency
ttr
I HODL mostly...but had a Trezor like 5 years ago or more.....it was empty and would not do the software upload and hung....I contacted Trezor...told them I had an
Alienware Laptop and they said 'high end' laptops of that type had an issue with too much voltage or some such with the usb ports (odd but specific error to high end laptops of the
time I remember he said ) I said where is the fix...he said it two few in number and was not often enough a bug to make a look into a fix so I should just use the Trezor
and re-do it all on a different laptop without the usb issue in that
it was empty. What if it was not empty was never addressed. I HODL anyway ..went back to paper wallets the next day ...hell btc dust is safer IMHO on PayPal or Coinbase
with that attitude...Trezor support aware of this but and not even gonna try to fix the bug? It was told not worth their time....maybe my view is extreme but was btc
dust so a non-issue. Actually, MAYBE by NOT having
a handy Trezor around kept me more in HODL mode anyway....as a habit these last 5 years on btc dust. Cumbersome paper wallets would be helpful in that regard.
Also I figure if Coinbase chokes on my btc dust the btc ecosystem has way more problems.

I'll have all my time crying on such a backlash on the large stuff.
32. Post 65895949 (unedited backup) (by philipma1957) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 16:29:38 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
You're missing the point: you asked if you should sell now and buy back later. My point is: nobody can tell you that.
He should sell it all and see if he is the new mindrust. Or if he was smart
Frankly I would not sell any large amount/percentage of my coin right now.
I will only sell when I really need to because I learned a long time ago that being your own bank is a great advantage, not a disadvantage, as at least 95% of people in the world apparently think.
Another reason (as if we needed one)to dump apple products. Fucking uk government
https://cryptoslate.com/will-apple-allow-government-access-to-bitcoin-private-key-backups-via-80m-icloud-backdoor/"The United Kingdom is weighing measures that could compel Apple to provide access to some iCloud data, raising a precise question for crypto users who keep wallets on iPhones and Macs.
If device backups and common file stores lose end-to-end protections in the UK, seed phrases and private key material can more easily move from a user’s device into locations where lawful process, or a Technical Capability Notice, can reach them."
Disclaimer: I have never owned any apple shit,only for work 😑
I have multiple core wallets on various macminis I do not use the cloud for backups.
I do not have any phone wallets or tablet wallets. So I think that my shit is safe.
also very little coin on the wallets.
It never occurred to me to use clouds, emails or similar things to store my backups - most of my coins are on air-gapped wallets with the seed/s and passphrase/s separated in different locations.
trezors and seeds are good.
33. Post 65895916 (unedited backup) (by LonelyEcho) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 16:20:02 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I personally consider selling as a bad way to accumulate bitcoin, so it is best to keep buying, especially if you are a newbie.
It is difficult to know whether you consider yourself as a newbie or an OG, Shishir99, since you have been registered here since early 2017, so surely it could have had been possible that you have accumulated enough or more than enough BTC.
I am not a newcomer to the forum. However, when it comes to having faith in Bitcoin and starting to accumulate it, I am relatively new to the concept. I actually didn't accumulate Bitcoin. I earned some Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies from various campaigns, projects, and websites, but I mostly spend them on buying gadgets, shirts, and that's it. I didn't make thousands of dollars at that time. But I am sure I could have had thousands of dollars if I had saved them in a wallet. I started accumulating Bitcoin for the last two years, maybe? However, I also sold some portions to buy things.
I am still holding some sats, and I am getting paid in Bitcoin from the signature campaign. I saved a portion of the payment. I am now in confusion because I don't know what to do in the current market. I know the market won't continue to grow; it will likely decline again. Shouldn't I sell some portion again and hold some fiat so I can buy back when the market goes down?
I regret it, oh how painful!
If I had been on the forum then and understood the importance of Bitcoin earlier. Then I would have been in a position to be proud of myself today.
Anyway, I am learning, understanding and slowly progressing. Although I am late, the game is not over yet.
Just Chill Bro...
34. Post 65895894 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 16:12:55 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
You're missing the point: you asked if you should sell now and buy back later. My point is: nobody can tell you that.
He should sell it all and see if he is the new mindrust. Or if he was smart
Frankly I would not sell any large amount/percentage of my coin right now.
I will only sell when I really need to because I learned a long time ago that being your own bank is a great advantage, not a disadvantage, as at least 95% of people in the world apparently think.
Another reason (as if we needed one)to dump apple products. Fucking uk government
https://cryptoslate.com/will-apple-allow-government-access-to-bitcoin-private-key-backups-via-80m-icloud-backdoor/"The United Kingdom is weighing measures that could compel Apple to provide access to some iCloud data, raising a precise question for crypto users who keep wallets on iPhones and Macs.
If device backups and common file stores lose end-to-end protections in the UK, seed phrases and private key material can more easily move from a user’s device into locations where lawful process, or a Technical Capability Notice, can reach them."
Disclaimer: I have never owned any apple shit,only for work 😑
I have multiple core wallets on various macminis I do not use the cloud for backups.
I do not have any phone wallets or tablet wallets. So I think that my shit is safe.
also very little coin on the wallets.
It never occurred to me to use clouds, emails or similar things to store my backups - most of my coins are on air-gapped wallets with the seed/s and passphrase/s separated in different locations.
35. Post 65895810 (unedited backup) (by philipma1957) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 15:49:25 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
You're missing the point: you asked if you should sell now and buy back later. My point is: nobody can tell you that.
He should sell it all and see if he is the new mindrust. Or if he was smart
Frankly I would not sell any large amount/percentage of my coin right now.
36. Post 65895285 (unedited backup) (by willydav91) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 13:26:01 CEST 2025) in sportbet.one has scammed me of 3000USDT:
I would also like to mention that I also tried contacting them via telegram since they have a telegram group listed on their website (
https://t.me/+ThXUpUG9AYLlgHs4). I said the same thing there that I said here, and they told me to use the live chat. I replied and explained that I seem to have been blocked from using their live chat. After I did that I was kicked out of the group and can longer join it. It also appears as though most of my messages I sent there were deleted too (I can still view the messages in the group but I can't join it again). I have not been aggressive or rude at all in any of my communications, but I am either blocked or ignored for every different way I try to communicate with them. I really have tried every possibility to communicate my issue to them.
This doesn't look good at all. No legitimate casinos would block players just for trying to reach them and discuss why they were blocked on other channels. The legitimate casinos would hear your words, and they would tell you the reasons. Usually, they kick out players and ban them only if they do not have any logical explanation and they are guilty. So, I assume they are running some kind of scam, and when people reach them, they block the players.
You seem good with your thread so far, but we know for a fact that people don't always tell the whole story. They only present it as if they are the victim. So, we need to hear from both sides to come to a conclusion. I hope you will be able to communicate with them somehow.
Do you mind sending the links to this thread?
The link to their Telegram group, taken directly from their website, is
https://t.me/+ThXUpUG9AYLlgHs4. In the chat, if you scroll back, you will see some of my messages that were not deleted (at least at the time of writing this).
I seem to have been blocked from using their live chat. When I click on it, nothing happens. I am not the only one experiencing this. Someone else in their Telegram group also complained that the live chat is not working (one of the latest messages there). I am sure they are aware of the issue, but they have not addressed it, as they later posted a promotional video without responding to this person’s complaint. My theory is that they block access to the live chat whenever a complaint is made.
They also do not respond to emails sent to their support address (
support@sportbet.one).
At this time, I unfortunately have no way to communicate with them.
37. Post 65895228 (unedited backup) (by Franklyn-wood) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 13:04:14 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Well, you are one of the OG, and I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
Even if you didn't had, it wouldn't be hard for you to accumulate since you are one of the Foxpup gang member

You know what I mean

He should definitely own some Bitcoin still because his activities and contribution in the forum suggest that he is still in the game. As for the Foxpup, it seems it is not only merit they are cycling but they also have a lot of Bitcoin to go round the privileged members.
There are people here that only come to check on this thread while holding huge portfolio of Bitcoin.
You can't tell who is holding and who is not.
Smart people are catching cruise here while they are multi Bitcoin millionaires.
38. Post 65895191 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 12:53:37 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
You're missing the point: you asked if you should sell now and buy back later. My point is: nobody can tell you that.
39. Post 65895178 (unedited backup) (by Odohu) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 12:49:02 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I remember selling 0.5 BTC for €200 when I started in Bitcoin, thinking I'd buy it back cheaper later. I'm still waiting for that moment....
Well, you are one of the OG, and I want to believe you still have a couple of Bitcoin.
Even if you didn't had, it wouldn't be hard for you to accumulate since you are one of the Foxpup gang member

You know what I mean

He should definitely own some Bitcoin still because his activities and contribution in the forum suggest that he is still in the game. As for the Foxpup, it seems it is not only merit they are cycling but they also have a lot of Bitcoin to go round the privileged members.
40. Post 65894111 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Wed Oct 8 02:58:43 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I personally consider selling as a bad way to accumulate bitcoin, so it is best to keep buying, especially if you are a newbie.
It is difficult to know whether you consider yourself as a newbie or an OG, Shishir99, since you have been registered here since early 2017, so surely it could have had been possible that you have accumulated enough or more than enough BTC.
I am not a newcomer to the forum. However, when it comes to having faith in Bitcoin and starting to accumulate it, I am relatively new to the concept. I actually didn't accumulate Bitcoin. I earned some Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies from various campaigns, projects, and websites, but I mostly spend them on buying gadgets, shirts, and that's it. I didn't make thousands of dollars at that time. But I am sure I could have had thousands of dollars if I had saved them in a wallet. I started accumulating Bitcoin for the last two years, maybe? However, I also sold some portions to buy things.
You surely have an advantage over folks who don't know about bitcoin, even if you seem to have had been making mistakes in the past and not recognizing the importance in accumulating bitcoin.
Perhaps you are able to correct your ways of thinking, and at some point start to think about bitcoin differently, since many of us likely recognize and appreciate that any and all people who have discretionary income can be advantaged by accumulating bitcoin in a focused way for perhaps one or two cycles or more, and surely the amount of discretionary income that a person has and also the amount that they are able to prioritize bitcoin investing and/or perhaps front load their investment, then they can get to a status where it becomes reasonable to spend their bitcoin.
Of course, I am not against spend and replace, and I also recognize that guys who earn income in bitcoin might be more forced to sell some of their bitcoin to cover their regular expenses, so calculations might be somewhat different for guys who are earning in bitcoin or maybe engaged in activities where they are spending and replacing bitcoin, yet at the same time, we seem to be in the midst of perhaps the largest peaceful wealth transfer known to mankind from the no coiners and low coiners and over to the coiners, so each of us who has coins or obtains coins are likely going to benefit more directly from such wealth transfer as contrasted to those who either do not have coins or are lackadaisical in regards to how many coins they choose to have (especially when they have way fewer coins than what they could have had). In the end, its totally up to you to figure out how much importance you want to place on bitcoin accumulation to attempt to do it sooner rather than later.
I am still holding some sats, and I am getting paid in Bitcoin from the signature campaign. I saved a portion of the payment. I am now in confusion because I don't know what to do in the current market. I know the market won't continue to grow; it will likely decline again. Shouldn't I sell some portion again and hold some fiat so I can buy back when the market goes down?
Of course, you can do whatever you like, yet personally, I don't recommend selling any bitcoin until you reach overaccumulation status, even if you perceive the BTC price to be high. If you have not been spending the past-ish years accumulating bitcoin, then you better get started.
You may or may not be able to get bitcoin cheaper than today's prices, and since you don't know it is best to be accumulating bitcoin through buying in a way that is persistent, consistent, regular, ongoing and perhaps even aggressive.. it can take 4-10 years or longer to really accumulate a decently good sized bitcoin stash..
Let's say that in the past 8-ish years, you had an income that had largely been between $30k and $50k per year, and you had largely been investing around $100 per week into bitcoin, so then you
would have had invested right around $42k and you would have had accumulated right around 4.3 BTC. If your goal was to be able to live off of your investment and to have right around an $80k per year income, you would still be in the process of building up your bitcoin to that goal.
From my perspective,
right now 4.3 BTC would merely be capable of generating a sustainable income of about $23k per year, it also seems to me that whether you continued to add to that stash or not,
by 2028, if your BTC stash were to be anywhere between 4.3 and 5 BTC, you would be in a position to be able to sustainably (meaning forever and ever) generate an income of at least $80k per year.. .including with annual increases in your income of 7%. I think that would be a good place to build towards, yet each person creates and builds towards his own goals.
@CryptoJelleNLThis cycle - on average, a weekly stochastic RSI cross results in a 35% gain.
So far, we're up just 6% from where the cross happened.
Lots more room to grow for #Bitcoin.
Target remains $150k. 📈
https://x.com/cryptojellenl/status/1975575120182976747Seems we’re having a little cool off at the moment. Down to $122,000 from $126,000 ATH. I’d like to see $120,000 hold, it’s just a little cool off then.
Eyes still on >$150,000 though boys. Come on man, just one more leg up 🙏🏻
We have not had a whole hell of a lot of blow off UP, yet our corrections have not been very great either. Ever since about October 2023, we probably have only had 1 or 2 corrections that might have gotten into the mid-20% territory or greater, with the correction from $109k to $74k being right about 30%. Other corrections have largely been in the 5% to 15% territory, and surely nothing to write home about if they cannot at least get to double digits (not that I am rooting for down).. I surely would prefer to keep grinding up, and I expect that at some point the amount of up is going to "be allowed" to run a bit more (not that bears really have a choice).
I bet what is going on is that the bearwhales are reading your posts, and they are purposefully slowing down our move to $150k, just to fuck with you, LFC... Since from reading your posts, they surely would know which OG bullwhale to fuck with... hahahahahaha.. wouldn't have had imagined that having right around 7x entry level fuck you status would have had put you at bullwhale status... by the way, it could be the case that you ONLY have around 5x entry-level fuck you status if you might have had been selling a wee bit more cornz along the way without saying anything... .. yet either way.. it is not a bad place to be...and yeah, no need to confirm or deny, since we have a decently wide range of variables that affect how we might choose to deal with our coins.
Shouldn't I sell some portion again and hold some fiat so I can buy back when the market goes down?
I remember selling 0.5 BTC for €200 when I started in Bitcoin, thinking I'd buy it back cheaper later. I'm still waiting for that moment....
It will be less painful if you did this and still have some Bitcoin now, you won't feel it much but will just see it as part of the process. Those sells are not entirely mistakes because buying and selling is what Bitcoin should do and those transactions makes the network stronger.
However, it would have been terribly bad if you sold those Bitcoin and don't have anyone now. The regrets would have been intense and renewed anytime Bitcoin creates a new ATH

. There were times I also sold some of my Bitcoins for reasons I don't know but then it was part of the business and what is most important is never to run out of Bitcoin.
I think that it makes a pretty big difference if you are merely selling some bitcoin from time to time, and accounting for your having enough or more than enough so you are merely reallocating into other assets or just making sure that you are not overly weighted in bitcoin.
It seems that part of the problem that Loyce is highlighting is that his goal in selling the coins was to buy them back at a lower price, which frequently I consider that to be the wrong mindset for anyone who is still early in his bitcoin journey and still building up his bitcoin stash, so in those circumstances, his goal would be to continue to increase the bitcoin quantity.
One of the problems in our early years in bitcoin we might not be sure exactly what we are accumulating or even consider that bitcoin's value proposition is so great that if we are not in it at the right time or when it does a staircase step upwards, then we are in a worse position because we lost our focus on accumulating..
Another thing that selling does is that it puts us into a waiting mindset, and so we are waiting around for the BTC price to go down rather than ongoingly buying, so we end up with fewer coins both because we sold too much too early expecting to be able to buy them back, and also we compound our problem by failing/refusing to continue to buy because we have it in our head that the BTC price has to come back down sooner or later, yet there are times in bitcoin's history when it never comes back down again... so then by the time we figure out that the BTC price is not coming back down, it may well be 30% to 60% higher, and we are still having a dilemma about whether or not we should buy some more. A lot of guys go through such issue in bitcoin, so it is likely not even a matter of smart or dumb, but just getting caught up in our own attempts to figure things out, when we likely would be better off just buying at any price for a decently long period of time before we start to think about prices and the extent to which our holdings are in profits or not.
Don't get me wrong, there still could be ways to ongoingly, consistently, persistently, regularly and even aggressively buy bitcoin while at the same time playing around with trying to buy more on dips or having systems of holding a certain amount of the buy authorized for dips that may or may not end up happening.
$125k per BTC. Cool.
But I'm afraid. For now, it's better for me if the market goes down.
Frequently for newbies, it is way better to stop thinking about bitcoin as a trade but instead a lifetime investment, and so therefore just keep buying regularly for at least 4-10 years or longer... but hey, whatever. You do you.
But I'm afraid.
bitcoin can sense your fear.. NEVER let btc see your fear. it will crush you.
fear is the mind killer etcOngoing buying helps that, especially for newbies... yet figuring out the amount to buy might well be another story.. $100 per week? $10 per week? or some other amount that is reasonably within your budget and of course within your discretionary funds.
$125k per BTC. Cool.
Good to see you back. You were one of the most inspiring technical guy that I have silently been following. Sincerely, I was scared you will carry those knowledge and abandon the forum that is like home.
I was also scared for a moment that I'll abandon the forum, but it turns out you cannot abandon it. You can only take breaks. Thanks for the compliment, btw. Back to game.
But I'm afraid. For now, it's better for me if the market goes down.
Bitcoin has an addressable market cap of $300T, which means you're buying it with a 99% discount. You're already in a long dip. More buying, less fear.
Thanks for your attention in this matter.
I think that right now, as I type this post, bitcoin's addressable market is close to $1 quadrillion in today's dollars (that is about a 500x), and of course, by the time bitcoin gets to $1 quadrillion in its market cap, the addressable market may well become $10 quadrillion (in real terms, rather than today's dollars) based on the ongoing debasement of the dollar.
In regards to addressable market, I am partially referring to some of the work of Jesse Meyers
https://www.onceinaspecies.com/p/bitcoins-full-potential-valuation
41. Post 65893192 (unedited backup) (by Zoomic) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 20:59:43 CEST 2025) in Please what is happening to AB de Royse777:
You did not interpret my post very well, I said I wish you to come online and you came online. I do not mean any harm but just for you to come online. You came online and explained what happened. Just that it was unusual of you but all have been solved now. Do not see this annoying. CoinTor scam in coincidence with your weeks break caused it.
I don't think he is alone who thinks it was stupid to create a thread just because he wasn't here on this forum. I have even taken a year break from the forum, and I think I am not alone in doing that. Do you really check all the campaign managers' forum accounts if they are online? You just didn't know that he was in the Saturday and Sunday Poker event, that is your failure. Most of his campaign participants (who played the poker tournament) know he hosted the tournament.
You created this thread yesterday, and he came back online in a few hours, posting an update on his Telegram channel/group. You could have locked this thread since you were proven wrong. Do you think it is still worth keeping this thread open?
I think it wasn't act that started the post about Royse, it was one whywhy account that started the speculation that a know manager could be exiting the forum or something like that. This was when information came from Altcoinstalk about a campaign managed by Royse being a scam and Royse locked the thread immediately after the scam without giving people the opportunity to talk about the scam. This was thr genesis of the whole matter, I do not see a direct accusation by act, although he created the post.
Royse will not exit the forum because of one scam. No matter how much is involved in the scam, Royse can still make such amount of money in few years working here in the forum.
42. Post 65892592 (unedited backup) (by justinlamode) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 18:12:44 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Shouldn't I sell some portion again and hold some fiat so I can buy back when the market goes down?
I remember selling 0.5 BTC for €200 when I started in Bitcoin, thinking I'd buy it back cheaper later. I'm still waiting for that moment....
It will be less painful if you did this and still have some Bitcoin now, you won't feel much but will just see it as part of the process. Those sells are not entirely mistakes because buying and selling is what Bitcoin should do and those transactions makes the network stronger.
However, it would have been terribly bad if you sold those Bitcoin and don't have anyone now. The regrets would have been intense and renewed anytime Bitcoin creates a new ATH

. There were times I also sold some of my Bitcoins for reasons I don't know but then it was part of the business and what is most important is never to run out of Bitcoin.
43. Post 65892474 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 17:42:38 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Shouldn't I sell some portion again and hold some fiat so I can buy back when the market goes down?
I remember selling 0.5 BTC for €200 when I started in Bitcoin, thinking I'd buy it back cheaper later. I'm still waiting for that moment....
44. Post 65892029 (unedited backup) (by willydav91) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 15:37:37 CEST 2025) in sportbet.one has scammed me of 3000USDT:
For the formatting, are you saying to put all my information into that formatting as a reply in this thread? Or should I create a new thread formatted in that way?
Thank you for the advice, I will try creating a complaint there.
As AHOYBRAUSE already said, you can edit the original post and update it according to the format. Just scroll up to the opening post, and you will see the edit button. You can make the necessary changes from there.
Unfortunately sportbet.one are not a listed operator on Askgambler.com, so I don't think they would be able to help.
This is really unfortunate. I'm not sure how else you can get a response from them, since they've been banned here as well. I think the only way you can push them is by sending emails and trying to reach them via live support.
I have updated my post to include that formatting. Thank you for advising how to do so.
I have unfortunately been blocked from their live chat. I was instantly blocked once I questioned why they think I have multiple accounts.
I have tried them via email too. I got an initial reply (as you can now see in my original post), but no follow-up since then.
45. Post 65892017 (unedited backup) (by _act_) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 15:33:19 CEST 2025) in Please what is happening to AB de Royse777:
You created this thread yesterday, and he came back online in a few hours, posting an update on his Telegram channel/group. You could have locked this thread since you were proven wrong.
Did I miss _act_ accusing Royse of something?
Do not mind him, I did not accuse Royse that he was involved in a scam. I only said if Royse did not come back online, but he came back online but many people are misinterpreting me.
Did I miss _act_ accusing Royse of something?
Just take a look at the OP.
If Royse does not come online again, that means he might be the one that owns the mixing site and see no reason to be on these forums anymore when he has scammed someone that sent million of dollar to the scam mixer. Or maybe Royse knows the people that owns the site, work together to do the scam.
I wish Royse not to be like this. I wish he is innocent but he is not coming online. Also he is not paying his campaign participants which makes it more of red falg. I mean not just CoinTor campaign participants that are now not paid, but people in all his other campaigns, he is not paying them. He is not even coming online.
Look, anyone can be anything. We never know who is behind which project. Royse has been managing the signature campaign on another forum, and that mixer was exit scammed. Mr _act_ think, it could be Royse who owned the mixer, or he knows the owner, and they did the scam together. It's all just because Royse did not come online on the other forum and here for a few days (Even though he was active on Telegram and even hosted some Poker Tournaments).
Shouldn't we understand that people have personal lives and they can be unavailable on the forum for many reasons? You have been offline here for a long time. Not only you, but a lot of reputed forum members were offline for a long time. We shouldn't speculate this and that just because someone went offline for a three or four days.
You are wrong, that is not an accusation.
a charge or claim that someone has done something illegal or wrong.
The accusation would be if Royse did not come online.
46. Post 65892013 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 15:31:49 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
I personally consider selling as a bad way to accumulate bitcoin, so it is best to keep buying, especially if you are a newbie.
It is difficult to know whether you consider yourself as a newbie or an OG, Shishir99, since you have been registered here since early 2017, so surely it could have had been possible that you have accumulated enough or more than enough BTC.
I am not a newcomer to the forum. However, when it comes to having faith in Bitcoin and starting to accumulate it, I am relatively new to the concept. I actually didn't accumulate Bitcoin. I earned some Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies from various campaigns, projects, and websites, but I mostly spend them on buying gadgets, shirts, and that's it. I didn't make thousands of dollars at that time. But I am sure I could have had thousands of dollars if I had saved them in a wallet. I started accumulating Bitcoin for the last two years, maybe? However, I also sold some portions to buy things.
I am still holding some sats, and I am getting paid in Bitcoin from the signature campaign. I saved a portion of the payment. I am now in confusion because I don't know what to do in the current market. I know the market won't continue to grow; it will likely decline again. Shouldn't I sell some portion again and hold some fiat so I can buy back when the market goes down?
47. Post 65892001 (unedited backup) (by Vod) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 15:28:55 CEST 2025) in Please what is happening to AB de Royse777:
Shouldn't we understand that people have personal lives and they can be unavailable on the forum for many reasons? You have been offline here for a long time. Not only you, but a lot of reputed forum members were offline for a long time. We shouldn't speculate this and that just because someone went offline for a three or four days.
Oh I agree with you. I'm just trying to reduce the anger towards _act_, who I can understand why he did what he did. It's a scary time out there and unless you have stolen thousands of bitcoin, many people need the signature income. Royse has a right to be offended if he/she wants, but hopefully this doesn't turn into a mob over a worried post.
Now, if _act_ had a lot of influence here, and if the accusation cost Royse income, there would be an avenue for legal compensation. But hopefully everyone knows Royse is a trustworthy person and we can move on.

48. Post 65891845 (unedited backup) (by Vod) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 14:47:07 CEST 2025) in Please what is happening to AB de Royse777:
You created this thread yesterday, and he came back online in a few hours, posting an update on his Telegram channel/group. You could have locked this thread since you were proven wrong.
Did I miss _act_ accusing Royse of something?
49. Post 65891005 (unedited backup) (by AHOYBRAUSE) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 10:20:49 CEST 2025) in sportbet.one has scammed me of 3000USDT:
I am sorry to hear that, OP.
I already see that you explained everything well. However, I would request that you follow the format below, so that community members can understand what we are discussing.
[b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Sportbet.one is no longer active in this forum because they got banned a few days ago from the forum for spreading malware. Their account was hacked, and the hacker was using their account to spread malware, which is why they got banned. I can see several complaints on their announcement thread which you can find here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5177893.480 and I want to believe this is typical behaviour of this sportsbook.
I will recommend you to create a complain on Askgambler.com and see if they come to solve your case.
For the formatting, are you saying to put all my information into that formatting as a reply in this thread? Or should I create a new thread formatted in that way?
Thank you for the advice, I will try creating a complaint there.
It's just a draft for opening posts (you can just edit yours, no need to make a new one). This makes it easier for everyone to see what the case is about and sometimes safes some time one might waste reading through a long post. Some people just write a lot without saying anything.
It's just a basic information overview in the end, easy to write in some minutes,
50. Post 65890513 (unedited backup) (by Little Mouse) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 06:12:07 CEST 2025) in [OPEN] Betpanda.io Crypto Casino | Signature Campaign | Sr Member+:
Week#40 payment has been processed- 92971de01cc27f62d260909698788be5429989b9dfc6341389f9ba4e3afb9f10
Please have everyone review the spreadsheet and ensure the respective BTC address is correct. Since we made a lot of changes, I may likely make a mistake.
Trofo
Mitchell
mv1986
notblox1
Oshosondy
Porfirii
slaman29
buwaytress
Rikafip
nutildah
MaxMueller
_BlackStar
Ultegra134
khaled0111
logfiles
PX-Z
LogitechMouse
ryzaadit
BitMaxz
bitbollo
Smartvirus
Darker45
stompix
Peanutswar
Rruchi man
dwyane36
stadus
examplens
The Cryptovator
crwth
hosemary
hd49728
cryptoaddictchie
joniboini
cryptofrka
Wiwo
memehunter
dimonstration
Harkorede
DYING_S0UL
Shishir99
EarnOnVictor
Botnake
armanda90
criptoevangelista
Questat
Perfectbaby
Uruhara
BALIK
Toro iskandar
Mallampue
topbitcoin
Dave1
rat03gopoh
liuka
BIT-BENDER
MystPhysX
indah rezqi
Promocodeudo
tabas
katanic97
yudi09
Alpha Marine
pusaka
ginsan
CryptoYar
coolcoinz
Mr. Magkaisa
jems
Joy- maker
Richbased
Gaza13
Tungbulu
Zoomic
Versatile_choice
Mahiyammahi
henmark
qurbanshah02
Juse14
mcdouglasx
wakier
Hazink
Renampun
arabspaceship123
Z_MBFM
bettercrypto
mikel_012
Out of mind
Cossyblack
Issa56
Sanitough
sheenshane
Asiska02
SuperBitMan
Z-tight
vanesha
rodskee
Finebone
jcojci
Localhostspeed
Mrbluntzy
ruykeri
Mindyspace
@nn@_pen9
Cryptohygenic
DYOR+BTC
atookz
MorganaX
Byebyebtc
UchihaSarada
tech30338
Hardyrobust
macson
osasshem
martinom
Ronsbit
cxtreenal
51. Post 65890473 (unedited backup) (by willydav91) (scraped on Tue Oct 7 05:49:02 CEST 2025) in sportbet.one has scammed me of 3000USDT:
I am sorry to hear that, OP.
I already see that you explained everything well. However, I would request that you follow the format below, so that community members can understand what we are discussing.
[b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Sportbet.one is no longer active in this forum because they got banned a few days ago from the forum for spreading malware. Their account was hacked, and the hacker was using their account to spread malware, which is why they got banned. I can see several complaints on their announcement thread which you can find here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5177893.480 and I want to believe this is typical behaviour of this sportsbook.
I will recommend you to create a complain on Askgambler.com and see if they come to solve your case.
For the formatting, are you saying to put all my information into that formatting as a reply in this thread? Or should I create a new thread formatted in that way?
Thank you for the advice, I will try creating a complaint there.
52. Post 65889186 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Mon Oct 6 20:09:31 CEST 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
[edited out]
Bitcoin really needs to give us a good ATH, not the DON’T get your hopes up kind, let’s pump to $130 - $150K.
Let’s have a new series of ATH.
$130k to $150k are fairly modest expectations.
@charliebilello
Gold (+48%) and Bitcoin (+31%) are the top performing major assets so far in 2025. We’ve never seen these two in the #1/#2 spots for any calendar year. $GLD $BTC
xGold is a bit of a distraction (in terms of what to invest into), even though gold is providing a bit of a market signal of worry/concern in regards to soundness of money and/or current likely precarious status of money/debt systems..
In other words, don't be putting (or keeping) any more than 10% of the size of your bitcoin holdings into gold, and even that might be too much.
Please BTC, this time make a real new ATH. With a massive green candles, not another ATH for ants...

How many more fake ATHs do we need in this cycle?

Doesn't seem fake to me, even though surely I will concede that we have been having a bit of a crawling and grinding of all time highs, and isn't that what people want. So many guys call for stability, and so this grinding up creates a bit of actual real world stability, in contrast to the blow off tops that might have had been our alternative way of BTC prices playing out.
Everyone on the train? Next stop 135K.

HEARD I just longed 80x for the farm!!!
K
You really have been lurking here for a while, Hottiek. Or did some scrupulous homework.
I have been here almost since the beginning. I also have a weird photographic memory... The name changed for "reasons," but yeah, I am glad to be back. I luv to shitpost. And even more, I am really looking forward to using some of these cornz! Now just to figure out what to upgrade first!
I do have to admit these are all endgame plans, and I have moved the goalposts a few times already as stated, but again, maybe I am not orange-pilled enough myself. As really we are still early, and even if I can't honestly fathom the fact that we still have 10x just to match gold, and that was always just a stepping stone to the true endgame... I feel like I am holding on to a full city block in the prime location of Manhattan... I sold a few low-end bodegas for pennies on the dollar just to afford to eat, but that's the real question I am asking... I have no trust to create, no family to take care of... If I can't possibly spend it all already, what am I holding onto it for? I really need to figure out how to not be so cheap, as... well... I can't take it with me!!
Definitely good problems to have tho!
K
There are so many of us who seem to be laddering on the way up, so in that way we are not getting too excited about selling very much at any given price. It seems to me that ladders can be created in ways that are mostly comfortable, but they are not completely comfortable, since there can still be regrets when the BTC price ends up correcting and then maybe thoughts about not having had sold enough.. which is part of the point of the ladder in order to shave off some level of satisfaction that allows for being happy whether the price goes up or down... it is difficult to find any exact level of satisfaction, even with ladder sales it could take more than a cycle or two for the cash from the ladder sales to really start to pile up.
OK that does it.
Getting even peaceful OOM to go berserk is a little masterpiece.
Diagnosis: 16 YO troll living in granny's basement, cause the parents have already had enough.
Plonk.
@d_eddie - OOM is anything but peaceful - he's a scumbag bully and I think you know he is - you having told me to tell him 'fuck you' when I was new here when the SOB was dishing out his shit... Remember? I sure do!
You're off on age by a factor of 4.

Yeah, if you were to be ONLY 16 years old, then how could you be a "seasoned" and "well-endowed" investor?
I actually sold some Friday night @ $121,000 and I will continue to dump some throughout Q4. Next sell hopefully over $130,000.
I am curious to know what old-timers actually do. Do they always sell their shares while the market is going up? I am curious if they buy back. I joined the rally late and am unsure whether I should sell my shares, despite being currently in profit. Probably, I would be able to buy back again during the bearish market. However, I am concerned because my investment is not substantial, and if I sell it and the market doesn't recover soon, I will regret the decision.
I want to believe that I am not the only one in this situation. What do you do, OG's?
Edit: By mentioning share, I meant my share of Bitcoin, which I am holding.
I personally consider selling as a bad way to accumulate bitcoin, so it is best to keep buying, especially if you are a newbie.
It is difficult to know whether you consider yourself as a newbie or an OG, Shishir99, since you have been registered here since early 2017, so surely it could have had been possible that you have accumulated enough or more than enough BTC.
In the end, it is up to you to figure out if you have reached a status of having enough or more than enough bitcoin and the extent to which you consider selling to be a good accumulation strategy in the even that you might have had determined that you don't have enough bitcoin, yet.
A lot of OGs make mistakes by selling too much too soon, and also they make mistakes by failing/refusing to continue to accumulate bitcoin and/or considering themselves an OG prior to their having had accumulated enough bitcoin to be categorized as such.
I am pretty sure that LFC has reached overaccumulation status within his own assessment, yet I am also thinking that he is under-estimating the top and giving too much credit to our up and coming dip.. yet I think that he is somewhat prepared (psychologically and financially) in case our dip does not end up going as low as he had expected... .. So yeah, of course, each of us come to our own assessments based on
our personal factors.
Will he ever learn?
ETFs are not Bitcoin.
They're meant for sissies!
#7wodigestsundayhaikus
this sissie whimpy has much
idle cash in his IRAs
ETF improves them# a friendly retort haiku 
FTFY hahahahahaha
[edited out]
Nice one.
I don't play any song like you, but a lyric starts tuning in my head when I see my Bitcoin goes up, which is,
You could be the greatest
You can be the best
You can be the king kong banging on your chestI am not a native English speaker, and I used to understand only a few lines without subtitles.
Here is my favorite one -
https://youtu.be/3Kxf2dHlDpQ?si=yHAEcW1_X7Vcoi-bThis is kind of a fantasy kind of a song... which does not seem to be a good mindset for an investor. There are needs to take emotions out of investment decisions, especially with something so volatile and crazy like bitcoin, which I doubt any of bitcoin's wildness and/or volatility is going to be going away the near future, even though some folks have been lulled into our recent crawling (grinding) up of the BTC price and perhaps concluding that this crawling (grinding) up is bitcoin's new norm.
I am curious to know what old-timers actually do. Do they always sell their shares while the market is going up? I am curious if they buy back. I joined the rally late and am unsure whether I should sell my shares, despite being currently in profit. Probably, I would be able to buy back again during the bearish market. However, I am concerned because my investment is not substantial, and if I sell it and the market doesn't recover soon, I will regret the decision.
I want to believe that I am not the only one in this situation. What do you do, OG's?
Edit: By mentioning share, I meant my share of Bitcoin, which I am holding.
For a newbie now, I would recommend buy as much as you can afford to every month for literally 15 but preferably 20 years.
It’s not late to get into Bitcoin now but it’s not early. We are now seeing diminishing returns but it’s still better than most, if not everything else.
I would tell a newbie to look at Bitcoin as a long term investment plan, it’s the perfect pension plan really. So long term, regular buying and you will make a lot of money. You’re not going to get rich quickly but you could set yourself up for life by dollar cost average buying every month for 20 years.
I guess the big target for people getting into Bitcoin now is to stack one Bitcoin which is a tough but still attainable target. One Bitcoin in 20 years will probably make you very comfortable, financially in most parts of the world.
The thing with Shishir99 is that he might have had already been stacking bitcoin for 8-ish years, which truly would give him advantages over someone just starting, yet the idea is still similar in which there is a need to get to a certain level of holding bitcoin before starting to consider selling, especially if a person has not reached overaccumulation status yet.
Regarding your use of 1 BTC as an example. My own charts project around 1 BTC to be enough for default entry-level fuck you status by around late 2037, yet of course when projecting out 12-ish years, there can be a variety of factors.. and surely in some locations, there might be some ability to have a standard of living that is much lower than my default entry-level status, which I consider to be $80k per year in today's dollars.