That is exactly how it is supposed to work. But Betpanda original games keep nonce 0 and change the server seed every bet.

আমি যতদুর জানি , যেহেতু ২১ মিলিয়ন মাইন করা শেষ হয়ে গেলে নতুন বিটকয়েন তৈরি হবে না, তাই মাইনাররা ব্লক রিওয়ার্ড পাবে না। যেমন আপনি বলেছেন, আসলে ট্রানজেকশন ফি মাইনারদের এক মাত্র আয়ের উৎস হবে। যেহেতু ১১৪ বছর পর বিটকয়েনের দাম অনেক বেড়ে যাবে, মেবি কয়েক মিলিয়ন ডলার হতে পারে। বর্তমানে বিশ্বের ১-৪% মানুষ বিটকয়েন সম্পর্কে জানে বা এর মধ্যেই কিন্তু বিনিয়োগ করেছে, যখন এটি বৃদ্ধি পাবে এবং বিটকয়েনের চাহিদা বেড়ে যাবে এতে ট্রানজেকশন ভলিউম বেড়ে যাবে যার ফলে ফি বেশি দিয়ে লেনদেন করার প্রয়োজন হতে পারে, এভাবেই ট্রানজেকশন ফি থেকেই একভাবে তাদের খরচ উঠে প্রফিট নিতে পারবে।

IMO, gamblers should always be able to afford to lose their bankroll otherwise, don't depo or lessen your depo especially with slot games since these games can be ruthless even if you're playing a low volatility game.

Although volatility matters as well, at the end of the day it's all about luck. One could get a good run and a dry run. Many people had good wins on these slots even at small bank roll.

Are you thinking of me among the others? Only a crazy person can have a good opinion about the one who wishes you death and destruction. Besides, those who whine the most are those who will miss his merits, and those who have a very bad opinion of the West but will never write it publicly.

This is a Reputation board, so it is logical that someone says something about the reputation of the person in question. To talk about the fact that everyone in the West is a pedophile and satan while at the same time in Iran legally marrying girls aged 13 (or even younger) is hypocrisy.

Have you been reading what many people are posting? Most people are wishing Pooya87 well and to my surprise many people also posted good about Iran. I think it is you that is now taking it to a harsh level like an off topic to what we are discussing. If you are referring to what people like PrimeNumber7 posted, you do not need to bring something about the war up. This thread is about Pooya87 and not fit in Politics and society. But maybe I should have made it self-moderated but just do not be harsh but discuss about Pooya87 if you have something good to talk about him.

It is very possible I will lock this thread if this is going only towards the Iran war discussion which I will see an an off topic.

I read some of the cases but never actually taught it would get to the point when they will just ignore all pending issues just because of the lack of communication or should I say they were probably just ignorant of the cases. Bc game is one of the few casino I still use till date though and haven't gotten any issues but if they can handle such cases in a market space that is very broad in gambling then it most certainly will resurface again anytime soon in the future.

Sadly, the withdrawal speed over here is slow(couple of hours average) even after passing KYC which is its biggest issue. This makes it seem like a FIAT site more than a crypto site. They don't have a VIP program for all customers(Only specific ones) too.

Their odds don't have crazy low vig like pinnacle etc either. It's a decent sportsbook overall, but they 100% will require KYC at some point or another and withdrawals aren't instant.

If a player has already passed KYC, there should be no reason for withdrawals to still take that long. But in reality, the processing time seems just as slow, especially for first-time withdrawals which is even more frustrating. I personally rarely play here anymore because the rules felt too strict and not very player-friendly.

USA wants the Oil, Israelwants to capture more lands in the middle east while the rest of the world got no clue about what is happening and they said this is to stop the nuclear weapons but what really happened was they just did the enrichment of Uranium not near the nuclear missile and even if we assume that they are building their weapon how other country can say no you can't do that?

Imagine China telling USA, you can sell oil anymore? What would be the response...

I have read where someone pointed out that the reason some casino representatives don't come out readily to defend allegations/accusations against them is because when a thread is opened against them, some over zealous campaign participants who doesn't posses skill in investigating matters will immediately attack the complainant and when the casino sees that people are defending them already, they will remain mute.

For the case of BC.Game, I remember somewhere last year when majority of the complaints in the scam board was about them, some community users argued the following:
1. BC.Game was growing massively, that it wasn't strange for them to lead in the statistics of complaints, because they receive most traffic.
2. Some said the attack might be from alleged competitors.
It has been long I followed up the scam accusation board, I don't have a fair knowledge of what is happening there now.

Perhaps they feel that they don't need to respond, but I would agree that if you stay and keep silent then there will be suspicions on their part. Nevertheless, we've seen multiple scams on a certain casinos, specially new one and most of them, haven't a proof and it looks like there are entity behind to demolished their competition.

So the community is still divided, unless that there are enough proof that casino blatantly not allowing someone to withdraw because they've won too big. And if this evidence sticks then the reputation of that casino is ruined and it might take some time before they can recover or not.

Like I always say, it is one thing to build a casino but it's completely another thing entirely to market it in a way gamblers will discover and use the casino, marketing is expensive and i think most casinos spend far more money on marketing than they actually spent on building the casino to stand and become usable.

No form of marketing will generate results in the first and even second and third and some times and in some situations, the fourth week as well, this is not something that is peculiar to this forum alone, even when running ads through Google adsense and other ad management platforms, it takes some weeks before an ad will begin to generate any results that will be considered good by the team, so what every team needs while running ads is patience and the zeal to keep building and improving their platform so that coming customers won't find a reason to leave, with time, every penny spent on ads usually pay off big..

This problem makes scam accusation board hard to follow most of the time since most of the complainants are abusers that manipulating their story to create a fake scam story against the casino.

People with less experience on checking evidence can easily give support to a narrative that casino scamming user. I’m glad that we have many users that is good on detective works and active fighting scam for the community.

Forum exposure creates a huge impact. However, if running a signature campaign doesn't contribute much to their company, they don't have a reason to continue, even though they think they can afford it. In fact, many casinos end their promotions here, not because of money problems but because of the results.

We can't just say that everything works here. Gamblers won't care a lot about whether the casino is running signature campaigns or not. They look deeper, especially at their reputation.

- Thanks for the kind words and the suggestion! Spribe has some great titles, and we'll definitely keep them in mind as we expand our game library. We'll share more updates as we get closer to adding new content, so stay tuned!


- You're right, the link is broken on our end. We're already on it and working to get it fixed ASAP. Sorry for the hassle, and thanks for flagging it!


- Thanks for the screenshots, that's really helpful. I'm checking with the team right now to figure out what's going on. I'll get back to you with an update as soon as we have one. Sorry for the confusion!

Agree with you but we don't know what plan they have and what they will do next. Running a signature campaign for a few weeks is not enough to gain reputations but for them maybe that is just a start to see how the market reacts and check the temporary result.

If that gives a nice result, they will make another plan running more campaign and not just signature campaigns but also other campaigns. That big brands such as you mention are running the campaign for a long time so that gives more good results for their business.

I don't think they have small budget for marketing as they revealed that this casino is only one of other casinos belong to a company. Perhaps they simply want to try with other marketing types and continue building up this casino from products to other things while who knows they will launch another signature campaign in the future.

If they already run it in the past, one or two times, what will prevent them running another one in the future?
Especially their company still run signature campaigns for other casinos in the same forum. It's only matter of time and product development, when time is right, they will run a next one.

Unfortunately, there are still a lot of people in this community who still wanted to take advantage of any casino. Meaning exploiting them as much as possible with their dubious schemes. I have seen a lot of scam accusations on almost all casinos. But majority of them are not surprised by that kind of attacks as casinos knows what their motivation are. And when asked for proved, those individuals can't proved anything except their words against the casino, and in the end, the community knows the real intention of this entities - to just have a smear campaign.

Thank you for identifying that guy for who he really is. Its such a shame that there are people deliberating looking for casino to exploit and when their scheme fails the come to the forum to make baseless accusations. People in his category are many, they usually pop up everywhere on the forum with new accounts to make their claims and they are very knowledgeable about the casino business which is why they go about trying to blackmail casinos into allowing them free pass with their cheating.

- we don't have any original games yet, but we're planning to add a few in the future. Stay tuned!


- Hey! The $1 email verification quest is always active, not random. Once you verify your email, head to the Quests section and claim it manually. It won't credit automatically without the claim step.

If you did that and still didn't get it, share your account ID and we'll look into it.


- Everything works on our end. Could you share a screenshot?


- Thanks. We'll definitely do that.


- Good question. KYC is not required to make a withdrawal. You can cash out without going through verification. That said, we may request it in certain cases, for example if there's unusual account activity or for larger transactions. It's standard AML compliance, not a default requirement.

This guy has over 600 posts, and didn't earn a single Merit. I expect 600+ "bounty applications", but he doesn't have those. I don't think I've ever seen an account with that many "normal" posts without Merit. His plagiarism is no doubt meant to earn Merit.
Too bad he's not banned

I’m glad I posted the outcome of my dispute with Bitz if it bothers people like you and brings you to using profanity.

You seem unable to distinguish between choice and duty. A business still has obligations even when a customer participates voluntarily. Your comment treats gambling as if it removes all operator obligations and reduces a casino’s only duty to paying winners. Under your logic, any attempt by a player to hold a casino accountable is automatically a “scheme.”

The casino industry does not support that position. Independent mediators do not support it. Casinos that take responsible gambling seriously do not support it.

Consider a simple example. A person walks into a bar already intoxicated and asks for another drink. Yes, the person chose to walk in. Yes, the person chose to order alcohol. The bartender still has a duty to refuse service. If the bartender keeps serving and harm results, the bar is liable. The customer’s choice does not erase the bar’s regulatory duty.

At the end of the day you can think whatever you want. You do not write the rules, interpret them, or enforce them. You are simply another forum user with an opinion. In this case, an opinion that was rejected by the documented record and by two independent mediators.

You and others repeat the tired line that a player would not complain if they made “handsome profits.” That argument misunderstands the entire issue. A casino’s obligations do not fluctuate based on the outcome of bets. The duty to enforce self-exclusion is triggered by written notice, not by whether wagers later win or lose. That is exactly why the mediators focused on the timeline rather than speculation about motives.

If you think the rule should be different, you are free to open a casino and try running it that way.