I don't think this is the case. I believe most members do not care unless the scam is proven. BC game had dozens of scam accusations, and a lot of forum members participated in their signature campaign during that time. I can speak for myself: the payout of Biggerz is tempting, and I would have applied there as well. But I think this campaign is kind of complicated. I don't want to force myself to post on other forums, which is a mandatory rule to join this campaign. I think many people won't apply because of this rule.

You look too confident about it. How? The manager said their weekly budget is $3K to $4K a week and they are planning a long-term campaign, but you are sure that it won't last long. Isn't it too much confidence?

Anyway, their safety index is terrible, which I mentioned in my last post. I believe it's because they did not solve the cases in a timely manner.

You're welcome.
FYI - Your responses seem AI-generated as well. It is okay to use AI to fix grammar or make the wording better since you are not making money from campaigns with these posts. However, people prefer human-written replies instead of AI-written responses. Your replies look totally AI-generated, and you know the best. I would recommend that you spend some time reading the posts and then write the response yourself.

I usually report the AI-generated post if it was posted by a forum member who is on a signature campaign, or has the intention to make money, or earn merits with their AI-generated posts. But I am not going to report yours because you are a casino representative. I would appreciate if you post the responses yourself.

User oneadvocate

So, I don't understand why the same post was deleted once and never again. Did it turn into human text just because that user pasted it again as new content? The evidence suggests this user is using AI to create these posts, but the moderators are ignoring the reports. Not sure why.

...
I am not talking about him
...

I don't understand why the mod deleted one post and won't delete the other, even though it was pure copy-paste. I believe the moderators often check who reported the post. They probably think I am not worthy enough. I would expect some DT members to report these posts for me.

The evidence suggests this user is using AI to create these posts, but the moderators are ignoring the reports. Not sure why.

The entire UI seems AI-generated, to be honest. I have not played there, so I don't know about the game UI yet. The first thing a player notices is the landing page, which looks AI-generated with one command. You should consider creating a brand logo rather than using a generic icon. Your brand logo represents you. Please don't rely on just an icon, which anyone can copy and paste; this looks like a low-effort design.

Consider minimalist design. You don't have to explain everything on the landing page. Create a custom theme for your website.
FYI - Behance.net is one of the platforms that you can use to hire a professional UI designer. Consider checking the designs from Behance

Thanks!
But I am not sure if I would continue to play here. As you may know, most online gamblers have their favourite casino, and I have mine as well. I try to stick with that and often play on different platforms if I see something unique or there are bonuses and promotions. Rizzy still has many rooms for improvement, and I hope they will improve the user experience to improve their platform. Adding a sportsbook should be their main priority at this point.

This is the 3rd time I spun the daily Wheel. My luck was not good enough to win anything from the daily wheel so far. 3 out of 3 landed in the Try Again slot, and I did not win anything. Good luck to you as well, Knuckey

Surely the Rizzy team are going to integrate the sport betting feature into their platform, am not sure if its due to some inability for them but probably looks like they just want to begin with casino games before looking into sports market. Perhaps you guys are sport bettors but in the meantime you could test out some of original inhouse games from Rizzy, am sure your enthusiast for casino games would be sparked as you probably get glued

Also, I know some Indian fake slot aggregator companies that actually supply fake casino games with go servers. I assume these scammers might use such services to display the 3rd party games on their website.

I did this once, and most of these accounts became inactive. Some of these accounts got negative feedback, some neutrals, and they chose to leave the forum since there was no more money with these accounts. Also, our local thread lost a lot of accounts, and our activity has reduced a lot since then. I know that I also created some enemies doing this, and I was attacked by them several times. The fun fact is, they are still around under different names, and sometimes I feel like I can detect them based on their writing pattern. This is not enough to prove the connection. nutildah did some extraordinary work this time, as he always does. I don't want to create more enemies here. I got a few DT1 exclusion doing these things instead of earning inclusion. LOL.

I believe the moderators often check who reported the post. They probably think I am not worthy enough. I would expect some DT members to report these posts for me.

Oh wow. It seems you have been around for a couple of months already, but I noticed you guys today only. I checked the website, and if you want me to share my honest opinion, I feel like the website UI is AI-generated, which is why it does not look professional to me. So, some players may think it's not a serious platform because of the UI. There are not many dedicated poker platforms there, so if you stay around and do proper promotion, there is a chance you would get some traffic from the forum.

Even though I do not play poker, I saw a few poker tournament threads, and I can say that the poker community is kind of big here. Sometimes more than hundred players participate in the poker tournament. So, good luck with the business.

User oneadvocate

This account was created to support bitbollo reputation thread, and since then, they have been only on the Reputation board. They are targeting users like DireWolfM14 and  owlcatz. They have been writing using AI and then using some kind of AI humanizer tool, which helps them bypass regular AI detector tools. So, I checked some of his post with Pangram and Originality, and here is the result.

বাংলাদেশে ব্যাংক এর পরিমাণ এমনিতেই অনেক বেশি। যাদের কিছু টাকা পয়সা আছে, তারা নিজেরাই একটা ব্যাংক ওপেন করে, তারপর গ্রাহকদের জমানো টাকা গুলো মালিক পক্ষ নিজেরাই লোণ নিয়ে সেই টাকা আর ফেরত দেয় না। এস আলম, বেক্সিমকো সহ আরো বেশ কিছু প্রতিষ্ঠান এই কাজ গুলো করে যাচ্ছে। বাংলাদেশে খেলাপি লনের পরিমাণ ৩৫% ছাড়িয়ে গেছে। ১ কোটি টাকা লোণের বিপরীতে ৩৫ লাখ টাকা খেলাপি, আর এই টাকা কখনো আসবে কি না, তার কোন গ্যারান্টি নেই। এই টাকা সাধারণ গ্রাহকরা লোণ নিলে ব্যাংক সেটা আদায় করতে পারে। জমি বা অন্যান্য সম্পদ নিলামে তুলে ব্যাংক টাকা আদায় করে থাকে।

বাংলাদেশে ব্যাংক এর পরিমাণ এমনিতেই অনেক বেশি। যাদের কিছু টাকা পয়সা আছে, তারা নিজেরাই একটা ব্যাংক ওপেন করে, তারপর গ্রাহকদের জমানো টাকা গুলো মালিক পক্ষ নিজেরাই লোণ নিয়ে সেই টাকা আর ফেরত দেয় না। এস আলম, বেক্সিমকো সহ আরো বেশ কিছু প্রতিষ্ঠান এই কাজ গুলো করে যাচ্ছে। বাংলাদেশে খেলাপি লনের পরিমাণ ৩৫% ছাড়িয়ে গেছে। ১ কোটি টাকা লোণের বিপরীতে ৩৫ লাখ টাকা খেলাপি, আর এই টাকা কখনো আসবে কি না, তার কোন গ্যারান্টি নেই। এই টাকা সাধারণ গ্রাহকরা লোণ নিলে ব্যাংক সেটা আদায় করতে পারে। জমি বা অন্যান্য সম্পদ নিলামে তুলে ব্যাংক টাকা আদায় করে থাকে।

কিন্তু যখন ব্যাংক মালিকের নিজের প্রতিষ্ঠান লোণ নিয়ে খেলাপি হয়, তখন সেই টাকা ব্যাংক কীভাবে আদায় করবে? ব্যাংক কি নিজের মালিকের বিরুদ্ধে একশন নিবে? এটা বাংলাদেশে কখনো হয়নি। ভারতের ছোটো একটা সিদ্ধান্ত ব্যাংকিং সেক্টর বদলে দিয়েছে, আর সেটা হলো, কোন ব্যাবসায়ী ব্যাংক মালিক হতে পারবে না। একজন ব্যক্তি ম্যাক্সিমাম ১০% শেয়ারের মালিক হতে পারবেন।

কিন্তু বাংলাদেশে রাজনীতিবীদ, ব্যাবসায়ী, অভিনেতা, অমুক তমুক ব্যাংকের মালিক। আর এরা নিজের ব্যাংক থেকে নিজেরাই লোণ নেয়, তারপর গ্রাহকের টাকা খেলাপি করে বসে থাকে। তাহলে আমাকে বলেন, এই ব্যাংক আগের মতো অবস্থায় কীভাবে ফিরে যাবে?

404. https://loyce.club/trust/2026-10-10_Sat_05.18h

Week 404 (2026-10-10_Sat_05.18h)
NEW 903702: Potato Chips (Trust:  neutral) (874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
NEW 971544: Shishir99 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (831 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

This is bad, actually.
If the casino is not releasing your withdrawal for that long, and you are unable to request new withdrawals, then you should stop making deposits and stop playing there until they process all your withdrawals. The casino should explain what is going on and why users have to wait for this long. Their withdrawal page shows that withdrawals usually take 1-6 hours to be processed. I assume they do not have enough bankroll to pay the winnings; this is the main problem with brand-new casinos. They have been there for only a few weeks. I would suggest the players not to make a deposit at this point and wait for update from the players who has pending withdrawals.

Legendary has been with us since April 12, 2014. The profile (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=313016) shows a bit more than 9,000 posts and about 2,000 in merit, with activity this month as well. There is no bio. What you see here is the thread rules, the auctions, and the trading. In your opening post, you made it plain you have never scammed anyone and that you are for a clean house, even going so far as to tell others to lock down their accounts. Some have said they will hold you to that.

Yet you made an issue of the admin.

Take Dec 2, 2021. You put in writing that Theymos would have saved a lot of money from scammers had he implemented 2FA years ago. Hardly a subtle way to call him out. The day before, you told bidders not to bid unless they secured their account, and certainly not to look for reimbursement in the event of an account takeover or MITM. You were clear you wouldn’t cover a loss from an unsecured account. So why is the bidder in one instance and on Theymos in the next?

In that same vein, you decried the new forum software as a scam and the SMF setup as a joke, directed at him since he commissioned the work. I have to ask why you used that word.

You also took pity on those with Donator status, saying if you held the rank you would want it to read “Scammed By the Forum.” That is a rank he bestows. He has gone out of his way to point out that donations are general support, not a guarantee of new software. Why put it in those terms?

You still do business here, and in the opening post you called it a well-known scamming forum while professing to want none of the nonsense. Why target Theymos and the donors on a site you continue to use? Do you stand by what you wrote and the call-out, or should an apology be forthcoming?

Been going through the late-September threads instead of the quote walls. Putting down what the posts actually contain, point by point.

Bitbollo (Legendary, joined August 2014, activity around 4130, merit around 5106, about 12,800 posts) opened topic 5594694 on 21 September about frogbet and the campaign run by Little Mouse. Public version of that dispute: a deposit on 14 September got converted into a bonus with heavy wagering after a free spin, the review reward was not paid on the stated schedule, he was told 24 hours, a week passed, escrow that had been held for the campaign was sent back, and the casino side later said roughly $100 had been credited on the site. He filed flags and left negative trust over the handling and the continued promotion. Amount was small. That part is a campaign and deposit argument, written up in 5594694 and 5594724.

Seven days later, 28 September, topic 5595318 opens under the title that he is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater and abuser. The arguments under that title do not hold up. Here is why.

1. Timing. The heavy title only shows up after he filed the frogbet complaint and the flags. The address overlap those posts rely on was already public in December 2016 (Avirunes note naming bitbollo, Cs87kxy and Cearea11). Nothing stuck to the Legendary account then. It gets reused now, a week after the campaign dispute.

2. One old address is not control of another account. The load-bearing link is 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2. Cs87kxy posted it on 19 June 2015 in a signature-campaign signup. Bitbollo posted the same string on 12 August 2015 next to 1BoSH7RisUAPpGfNbX8scSB43YP6Tx3g7M and 1JwLxS3za2s9gFVzn4SKk6xpgg24bxxh9d. In 2015 addresses were pasted into contests, quoted, and reused in giveaways. Posting a string someone else already posted does not show who held the key in 2016 or 2017, when the other account picked up its negative trust.

3. Exchange hot wallets are shared. Later posts point at both sides sending toward a cex.io hot wallet. A hot wallet receives deposits from thousands of customers. Shared traffic into an exchange wallet is not proof the keys are controlled by one person. Deposit addresses and hot wallets get mixed traffic all the time.

4. No proceeds TXID. Bitbollo has said in the thread that 1BoSH7RisUAPpGfNbX8scSB43YP6Tx3g7M is a long-used address he can sign for, that those addresses have years of ordinary exchange activity, and that he wants a TXID of scheme proceeds hitting them. Across the pages of 5595318 that TXID is not produced. What gets shown is old posts, co-spending into exchange infrastructure, and a list of DirectBet tipster addresses. Negative feedback for the boostcrypto thread (exit in about a week, trust note March 2017, “ponzi scammer”) and for account sales sits on Cs87kxy, not on the Legendary account.

5. DirectBet and account sales do not carry the title. The tipster rules linked in the accusation allowed a few entries per player. Account buying and selling was ordinary marketplace traffic on this board in 2015–2016. Neither of those, on the posts cited, turned into a red tag on bitbollo at the time.

6. Record after the old posts. Merit and activity accumulated across the decade after 2015. He has run the Bitcoin collectibles meetups (Milan, Catania, Tokyo, Seoul dates in topic 5503159), free drinks and open invite, merited by long-standing members. That is the visible activity, not a hidden scheme tied to a satoshi trace.

I went through the cited posts, the June and August 2015 address dates, the 2016 note, the trust entries on the other account, and the transaction claims in 5595318. No post in that thread shows scheme proceeds entering an address Bitbollo has used in the open for more than ten years. The charges in the title are not established by the material that was posted.

Shishir99 only started digging after Bitbollo left him a negative on the 21st. He said that himself on the 30th. The frogbet thing was a missed reward and a deposit, about a hundred bucks. Hours later, he opens 5594724 quoting the trust note. A week later, 5595318 shows up with the long title, and under it is a 2015 address plus a note from 2016 that never got bitbollo a tag. No tx of bad coins hitting an address he has used in the open for ten years. That is a reply to the feedback, not a new case. Bitbollo is innocent. Not a scammer, not a ponzi promoter, not an account trader, not a cheater, not an abuser. Bitbollo is innocent of the accusations that he is a scammer, a ponzi promoter, an account trader, a cheater, or an abuser.

A review of DireWolfM14’s https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859 public record shows he has made use of “retard,” “retarded” and the like as an insult repeatedly. He has been a member since April 4, 2018, and his profile contains 6,856 posts spread across 344 pages. I didn't include “retort” or any quotes from others because private messages and anything he deleted don't show up on the profile.

I reviewed his history to determine whether his use of those words was an isolated error or part of a pattern. The answer is obvious; it is a pattern.

That is significant. We are not talking about mere antiquated vocabulary here. Educators, the medical community, disability groups, and society at large have put aside this kind of terminology for good reason, having found it offensive and stigmatizing to those with intellectual disabilities.

Members of Bitcointalk may have their differences. One can denounce an argument as wrong, dishonest, or ridiculous without having to degrade people with intellectual disabilities.

Examine the dates and the repetition in his posts and form your own opinion: is it right to humiliate fellow members with slurs?

Well, sorry for being kinda rude. I probably worded it pretty badly. Which I edited out now, and I expect you to remove it from your quote as well.