In fact, their thoughts are quite strange. From the outside, they may seem random or incoherent. But if you observe them closely, you can guess what they want to do. When you can catch their stupidity, you will often laugh at their stupidity.

Yes, this was cleared up for me yesterday because I made a wager using that SATS yesterday. It was probably around 0.36 cents.
But unfortunately I couldn't make any big profit with it. I played chicken cross games and was able to go up to 3x and then my chicken  got mashed by car lol.
Still, I like the bonus that, it's real 0.36 cents and  it's free. 

They have had months to fix issues with their merchants or find new merchants to complete INR deposits for Indian users yet the drag their feet and are solving nothing, meanwhile more and more cases are piling up. How many other cases are there that we don't have a clue about?

So yes it is the merchants fault for not completing the transaction, but BC is still at fault for continuing to deal with the incompetent merchants they are using IMO. If the system they have isn't working and their customers are being scammed, why wouldn't they want to fix it?

May I beg to differ due to the reason I mentioned on my previous post?

IF a flag is from INR user, then it's quite likely due to FIAT transaction, one of which doesn't have a direct influence from BC, thus, unless the INR-user worded their thread very specifically, the one "being flagged" should be the merchant and flagging BC for INR FIAT depo [again, depending on the circumstances and how the thread conveyed] will be a wrong act.

If the flag was for cases that's internally and directly under BC's control like [urlhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573555.0]this[/url] or this, then yes, maybe it's time to get a red banner to fly high, with hope that it'll be a waking slap to BC's management.

Thanks for the information, each casino has its peculiarities, but the attraction of offering the lowest possible house edge is very good. I haven't created an account yet, how does the multi boost work in sports betting?

I'm testing new strategies, usually in sports betting, where I place small amount in bets with a good multiplier...

People are delusional if they invest in Bitcoin to get rich, because the time is gone for one to be able to potentially make life-changing profits from a Bitcoin investment, that was only possible for investors before 2015 or so, because only those who invested back then managed to get very high returns on their investments if they kept holding, but those who invest now or after this point onwards, they should only expect good profits, and good profit I mean like investing $500, and expecting maybe $2,000 or a bit higher than that in about 5 years or so, because is not at a price point where it can go 10x or 20x because that would require Bitcoin to have a valuation above $1m, which isn't a joke.

So, I think it is unrealistic for people to actually think that they can get rich from their Bitcoin investments, and this is the main reason why so many people go towards altcoins because they know Bitcoin is not going to make them significant profits, so they choose altcoins so that they can make good money from them, but we all know that most altcoins end up making everyone lose money, so it's better to just stick to Bitcoin and happy with whatever profits we make from it.

I think we need to consider to start tagging them as an unreliable business TBH. I have been trying to refrain from tagging them, but it's getting really close to that happening. At the very least some affected users from India region need to create a flag and it will get support.

Does anyone think BC cares about the forum at this point? Their rep seems to do nothing but twiddle his thumbs.

I agree with you, i also have come across some casinos where the smaller or decimal unit of bitcoin is referred to as bits and are often written in a whole number value, that is without any decimals and it's does confuse me at times, I usually will think it's an altcoin totally different from bitcoin, I will think it's the casinos own cryptocurrency.

But on casinos where the smaller or decimal unit of bitcoin which we all know and refer to as Satoshi is listed as Sats, such confusion as the above does not arise because we all are very familiar with sats, we know that any amount of bitcoin that is less than 1.0 is generally referred to as satoshi.

Fortunately or unfortunately, such people simply have nothing to think with; this forum sometimes observes a lack of gray matter.

Bitcoin cannot make anyone rich quickly, Investing with the intention of getting rich quickly is completely foolish. To be successful by investing Bitcoin, it is very important to first gain proper knowledge about Bitcoin, as well as to have knowledge about the existence of the market and to choose prudent money for investment. When we acquire proper knowledge, use prudent money and have knowledge about the volatility of the market, we will not be disappointed quickly by the existence of the market after investing, we will be able to buy Bitcoin with confidence and hold it, as a result of which we can expect profit in the long term in the future. Investing with the hope of quick profit can double the risk of losing money.

I think this quick funds is what is making some investors to make a wrong decision because I don't see any reason that will make some investors to think bitcoin risk is not good to take either long term holding or short term holding, if truly the investors have the knowledge of bitcoin and what it can bring out in the future, it will make majority of investors to invest more on bitcoin in this bearish season,  for those looking for quick way to make funds always fall victim to scammers in the community, and there is nothing you can use to stop them not to take the risk of what scammers has introduced to them because you will not have that time to convince them.

I was curious to visit this ANN and the duel.com website.

Does Duel.com offer any kind of weekly or monthly promotion, a type of betting tournament or anything like that?

The problem starts when the rounds or spins become unfavorable to your bet. Then you start betting double the amount of your initial bet to recover the lost amount and reset the bet on wins, in the case of a 50% or 55% probability of winning in some games with a high RTP.

Generally, when I bet a lot on games like dice, I always started well, but then, after a few negative bets, I see that I finished the game with a much lower value than I started with. 

Not really. Yes, it could happen, but on 1,000 spins that result, 55-45, is 0,017% likely (AI calculated). But I agree with the idea you express.

All of our games are fully operational and regulated by rtp and maxwin. You can log into our demo bot yourself and see for yourself. I can answer it, and it's not a problem for me, I'll send you a link to the demo bot in the telegram. https://t.me/ragespin_bot

They would respond only if such matter would be brought to mediators and the silence would be treated as something that would lower their score down

Some people know and some don't. There are also MLM (Multi Level Marketing) schemes where users are first asked to buy a package, and then invite other users to increase their own earnings. I have seen so many of such projects, and people invest so much money in them and also keep referring others to it. The majority among these users are internet illiterates who have joined the internet only to use social media platforms like Facebook so that they can upload their pictures daily and like and comment on others' pictures, but now they have heard people say that online earning is a thing, so they are always looking for opportunities, and when they are pitched such projects, they start imagining the good life they are going to have after they join.

So, a good number of people who get into such schemes and projects are the ones who are basically guided into them and they don't even know what they are. I have come across so many people who can't even answer the question that what does the project actually do to produce the profits that they share with you, because they know nothing about it, and they have just been told that they are going to make money if they invest, so they did it.

No, man.
Anyone trying to reach over 100k dollars and only with games which do not allow to aim for small multipliers is going to have their balance pretty much drained in less than a couple of hours.

Slots and third party casino games are supposed to force people to gamble as little as possible for the sake of making their session to last long enough so it can be enjoyable, there is no way to make all this OP plan viable if there are not games like plinko or dices available for people to try.

I would not be surprised it was not the case though, casinos are not in this business to provide easy money to gamblers, they are a business and they need to get their profits from somewhere, logically.

They really have to be smart if they think they can cheat a casino. If not, they’re just fooling themselves, thinking they can outsmart the system.

Casinos are always upgrading their security and systems to protect their platforms from abuse. They’re dealing with thousands of users and sometimes millions in bets, so of course they have to protect their business.

Even if casinos are profitable, without a good system for detecting fraud, they won’t survive in the long run. Too many losses and abuse will kill them.
So I agree with you. Not everyone is smart enough to realize that, and your point makes sense.

More than two years after he had to leave the forum, his posts still earn more Merit than most users. His legacy will help forum users for many years to come. He definitely left an indelible legacy.

Still the best candidate for this category, and not only because of his name. He's made finding older posts much more accessible, and I still use his site at least weekly.

The users above are #2-4 on my Sent Merit list, and I've seen their posts everywhere during the year. I often find myself unable to send more Merit because of the 50 per month limit. Those users are truely Bitcoin Geeks.

This, of course. Although I always feel like I can't do everyone justice because I'm terrible with names and don't have the time to re-read everything I've read in the past year. Last year I said I should take notes this year, unfortunately I slacked off and had to improvise again.

Last year I decided to call this member a "Project", and I'll do it again this year. I'm talking about his contributions on improving the forum. He announced he's stepping down, so this is my last chance to nominate him as Best Project.
You've made it to #1 on my Sent Merit list again, which is quite an accomplishment with 294 well-deserved Merits.

Although not technically a Newbie, stwenhao made most of his contributions in 2025 and stood out this year. He thoroughly understands how Bitcoin works on a technical level.

Since I hate AI chatbot diarrhea with a passion, I'm nominating these users for their contributions to the AI Spam Report Reference Thread. In order of appearance above, they've contributed 224, 222 and 164 posts to that topic.

I'm still thinking about this one.

I'm only fluent in one local language, and that board is almost completely abandoned.

Year after year after year

I partially (largely) based this list on my votes from last year.

I made a Top 50 of my sent Merit in 2025, to help me find back the right users:

She is working for both Stake and Primedice, she also has direct contact with the support staff of Stake. But you would have said the same thing as me if you closely followed all the accusations against Stake in this forum. 'Symphonized' had said this a long time ago,


But I have never seen any engagement from Stake representatives in the scam accusation board. Users come here with their complaints, then disappear after a few days, weeks or months without getting any help. Where the users are directly getting help on the mediators like Askgamblers and CasinoGuru with the direct involvement of Stake representative.

If the name already appears, it means the account is already existing, so the user should be able to proceed using that same username when creating the account.
I don’t think there’s much problem with the account creation process itself. That’s usually not where the real issue is.

KYC is just basic information. It doesn’t really change the fact if a gambler is cheating or not.

Honestly, this is just my opinion, but I don’t understand why when an account becomes suspicious, casinos suddenly require KYC. That’s where many players fail, not because they’re cheating, but because they can’t pass the KYC for some reason.The real issue was never KYC, it was the suspicion of cheating. But once it stops at the KYC stage, the casino already wins. Sometimes it feels like this system is being abused, in my opinion.

If they change everything, device, routers and IP address, they can cheat the casino and system will show a new identity.

Well, you are right, in a case where a user was found guilty of breaking a casinos terms and conditions, and the users account have to be blocked and fund confiscated, it's absolutely the users right to know exactly what the did that lead to their account being blocked and their funds confiscated, atleast this will help the user know for sure if the casino is right or wrong in their judgememt, this should be a priority for casinos especially the ones that claim to be transparent in their dealing with customers.

But in this particular case though, I may not want to believe that the user in question commited any offense, the blockage of his account maybe a system error that is due to the failed utility bill verification.
Lets not forget that most advanced casinos use automatic kyc verification system, and in a situation where the users document fails to meets the system's requirement for the verification to pass, the system may be programmed to automatically block such account and stop any form or withdrawal pending when a real human comes around to take care of the situation..

This is just my assumption.

There's no better evidence anyone can give here to either justify this claim or counter it. What really matters is that the benefits of daily pushups is personal and would always remain personal. Anyone can fake it if he feels like but then what would you gain claiming to be fit when actually you are like a waving feather. We push regardless.

100k,Tonimez,419,52942,2026-02-22