I can't remember the name of any specific slot game as I haven't played the slots game for wagering purposes since so long. I used to play different slots game of Betsoft, NetEnt and 1Spin4Win providers. Always choose a game with low to medium volatility that has a higher hit ratio. BCgame shows those information for some games in the description.

Even the highest RTP from NetEnt still hard to get a x20 wager of your bankroll due to slot games volatility.

And some casino even excludes specific slot games on their bonus wager count that makes it very hard to complete a wager requirements. Relying on hitting a huge multiplier on the process is the only way to possibly beat the bonus wagering requirements which we all know very to do.

Participating on casino tournaments such as multiplier or wagering contests is much worth it chasing.

But some of the NetEnt slot games offers high multiplier above 98%.

You are right bc.game live support sucks. However, I have recieved the refund to my bcgame count, thanks to the twitter admin of bcgame. I have again given withdrawal request and I will inform you if I don't receive the funds again to my bank account. Thank you very much for your support everyone

I feel like you just used AI and copied and pasted my response, and asked the AI to generate a response agreeing with my point. I don't see anything else in your response. You essentially said the same thing I posted, but you changed the wording slightly. Solo miners aren't mining just because they want to keep the network alive; they also mine for profit and passion. Even if they stop mining Bitcoin, the network will still stay alive. How many solo miners can mine a block today? Almost all the blocks are mined by the large farms.

The economic realities split the mining world in two, The farms follow the money globally, which secures the chain but centralizes risk, the solo miners, even with a tiny slice, keep the dream of permissionless mining alive the network's health depends on both existing.

"The merchant confirmed that this order still has no return.Please be informed that this withdrawal has been successful and there is no return, please see reference. UTR: 535704781007"

This was the response from bc.game twitter handle

I have checked the statement again and I confirmed with my bank and they said there hasn't been any payment with that amount/UTR number to my account and they also said that they can't check if it's fake or if it's failed or not because it has to be done by sender and it needs to be checked with Sender bank.

The INR Merchants are clearly robbing Indian players and BC.GAME isn't helping us

Trump is US president and it's natural for a head of state to say such thing that his country will be number one. He also has a political slogan, "Make America Great Again MAGA". But if we look at actions of Trump since he took over US presidency then they are very disappointing. In last one year, he tried to impose trade tariff on China twice but has to back off because of China strong retaliation. We saw biggest crypto liquidation on 10th Oct 2025 because of Trump statement on imposing 100% trade tariff on China. This is true that his family is involved in crypto and they are getting huge profit because of Trump statements and policies.

Yes individual miners usually do so as they wish to keep network alive and have their coins in long run, despite increasing electricity costs going above current value of Bitcoin. However, professional mining farms are more like large corporations, as they move to locations where electricity is cheapest in world and take advantage of special offers to make their costs as low as possible. These large farms tend to hold on to their Bitcoin until new high and then sell their coins making profit and buying better equipment. Although solo miners contribute to decentralization of Bitcoin, mining farms supply enormous amount of power to make network safe.

for real, u nailed it. big farms are just spreadsheets and cashflow. they gotta pay the insane electric bill lol.
the solo miners though? thats pure passion. runnin a rig in the garage like a digital gold panner. they're in it for the revolution, not just the profit. two diff worlds.

I also supported him in the last election, not because I believed his promises, but because I thought he would have been a better candidate than Harris.

But no, most of us made a mistake in supporting him. Not only is the cryptocurrency market getting worse, but the global economy is also falling into chaos under his leadership. 
We had hoped to see significant improvements in the overall economy under his leadership. But instead, the current Trump administration's economic decisions and policies have only made things worse.

This is why political hype is dangerous it's all narrative manipulation the family's direct involvement in a token scam is the ultimate contradiction, until there's a verifiable, positive policy shift it's all just noise to capture votes, stay focused on the tech, not the politician

Makes sense the big operations treat mined coins like inventory, not a belief system they'll sell to cover costs or lock in gains. The solo guys are like collectors, mining for the love of the game
two completely different motives under the same activity

Fair criticism — and I agree that staff talking to the official rep account looks bad and can easily be interpreted as “bumping” or fake interest.

That said, to clear this up:

Raisero is new here and is still learning how this forum works (and how strict the reputation culture is — for good reasons).

Yes, he’s working with/for SunFireCasino and he was trying to help keep the ANN thread active and answer/engage, not pretend to be a random gambler.

There was no intention to mislead, but intent doesn’t matter much when the optics are this poor — so we’re correcting it.

Going forward we’ll do it properly:

Staff accounts will clearly state they are staff (no ambiguity).

We’ll stop staff-to-staff “conversation” in the ANN. If there’s nothing to reply to from real users, we won’t “manufacture activity”.

Merits will not be sent between internal accounts just to “decorate” posts — if something is genuinely merit-worthy, the community can decide that naturally.

We’ll focus on what actually matters: transparent updates, answering questions, and letting the product speak for itself.

Bitcointalk has specific norms and people protect them for a reason. So instead of jumping straight to “scam/shill” accusations, it’s also fair to help new users understand the culture — especially when they’re not hiding who they are.

To be fair we are all new here and we are still learning how things work around =) We don't need weird techniques to show how good our product is just trying to give more visibility =)

Point taken, lesson learned, and we’ll keep things clean from here.

I also do not believe in gambling as a form of entertainment. Of course, there is an element of entertainment present in the process, but it is definitely not a complete description of gambling as a phenomenon. Most people play because they hope to win, and to win big, so that the amount means more to them than what they are usually able to earn. And it is this hope of having a chance to win several times their monthly or even yearly salary that keeps people tied to gambling. It is hardly something that can be called purely entertainment.

Yeah, it sounds insane. This was a multi-national engineering firm and they had all the processes that you are talking about. The employee that got scammed knew the protocols. And they still approved fifteen separate transfers on five different bank accounts because they SAW their colleagues on video that it was legitimate.

Critically, the scam utilised exact the legal processes. The deepfakes were good enough that the employee thought they were following proper authorization procedures. They believed that they were being careful in demanding the video call.

Caller ID can be faked. Video can be faked. Even if the call is coming from the right number and you see the right face, you don't still know whether it is real.

You're not wrong smaller amounts are more common. And as the technology is becoming cheaper, what's preventing these syndicates from doing hundreds of smaller scams, instead of one big one? The barrier to entry is coming down quickly.



The Turkey case is interesting because it shows how fast this was to move, right? Anyway, they caught the person. Security forces arrested them. There was accountability. But I wonder how many times there were attempts that we didn't hear. How many worked. How many government officials or companies got fooled but never say anything like it's embarrassing.

Voice to video is a huge leap. With voice you can be suspicious anyway. But video? That's where our brains just... accept it. We tend to believe what we see rather than what we hear.

Do you think that the institutional targets (governments, high-ranking officials) are rather more or less vulnerable than the regular people? Because on the one hand, they have security teams and protocols. On the other hand, they're high value targets worth the effort.

Like, the individual who tried to impersonate Erdogan probably spent a lot of time and money to do so because the payoff would be massive. But now that the technology is getting cheaper, are those economics changing in terms of who gets targeted?



The social media deepfakes are pretty obvious. But, the deepfakes that you see on the social media are created for fun or low-effort scams. They're not targeting you specifically. They don't have to be perfect because they're casting a wide net.

This was a targeted attack on a specific company with preparation time. The scammers knew who the CFO was, what he looked like, how he talked. They probably scraped hours of video from company presentations, earnings calls, public appearances. Then they created the deepfake - specifically for that employee. And they impersonated several executives during a real-time video conferencing.


Click to the image for fast transfering to google

The privacy angle is interesting though. You're correct, if a third party has your data, then something went wrong. But in this case, the data they needed was in the public domain. Company website. LinkedIn. Earnings calls. Press conferences. All public information. They didn't have to hack anything. So they just had to scrape out what was already out there. And moreover, He is CFO

The employee in this case did everything right by traditional security standards. They were suspicious about the email. They demanded video verification. They still got destroyed. So what's the standard now? Never trust video? Never trust voice? Only perform financial transactions in person?



Who pays for it? Because if the solution is "buy software to detect fakes", then we're just creating another problem from our own advancement. People who have money get protection. Everyone else continues to be vulnerable.

The economics of this arms race do not favor detection. Generating deepfakes is becoming less and less expensive by the month. Detection requires constant updating, constant investment. The attacker does not have to win all the time. The defender must win each and every time.

I've been thinking about this a lot since I wrote the post. The limitation of AI that you're talking about, yeah, it exists now. But it's shrinking. Every time detection gets better, generation gets better too. And generation's always gonna be cheaper because you're creating something, you're not analyzing something.

So even if anti-AI software becomes big, I don't know if it solves the underlying issue. Which is: trust used to be free. Now it costs money. And that cost is going to continue to increase.