It's been discussed for the last 6 pages of this thread.  You appear to have more time to invest in this drama than I do, so feel free to do your own research.  Curb your bias, and it'll stare you in the face.


I don't disagree that there are some DT members who love nothing more than to see their names plastered on every rando trust wall.  If you think I'm one of them, or you find inconsistencies in my feedback, please point them.  I'd love to remedy that.

Please report them here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158452.0

---

---

আসসালামু আলাইকুম আশা করি সবাই ভাল আছেন, আগস্ট মাসের একটিভিটি তে ভালো ফলাফল দেখে ভেবেছিলাম সেপ্টেম্বর মাসেও আমরা আরও বেশি অগ্রসর হতে পারবো কিন্তু এই মাসে পূর্বের মাসের তুলনায় কিছুটা অবনতি হয়েছে।

পারসেন্টেন্সের হিসাব যদি আমরা করি তাহলে আমাদের এই সেপ্টেম্বর মাসে পোস্ট একটিভিটি -33.55% এবং মেরিট আর্নিং -42.86% কমে গিয়েছে আগস্ট মাসের তুলনায়। তারপরও আবারও সেই একই প্রত্যাশা থাকবে যে সামনের মাসগুলোতে আমরা ভালো করব।

 নিচে বিস্তারিত ডাটা গুলো চার্টের মাধ্যমে তুলে ধরা হলো।

---

সেপ্টেম্বর মাসের  টোটাল পোস্ট হয়েছে           = 101টি

এবং  মেরিট ট্রানজেকশন হয়েছে                = 20টি

প্রথম তিনজন সর্বোচ্চ মেরিট অর্জনকারীঃ
Crypto Library   8
Royal Cap   5
DYING_S0UL   4


প্রথম তিনজন সর্বোচ্চ মেরিট  সেন্ডারঃ
Mahiyammahi   7
Xal0lex   5
Bd officer   2

---

আগস্ট মাসের  টোটাল পোস্ট হয়েছে           = 152টি

এবং  মেরিট ট্রানজেকশন হয়েছে                = 35টি


প্রথম দশজন পোস্টদাতা
1. Bd officer: [21]
2. Crypto Library: [17]
3. DYING_S0UL: [16]
4. Review Master: [15]
5. Shishir99: [10]
6. Z_MBFM: [7]
7. Nothingtodo: [6]
8. NNRR: [2]
9. ChainPilot: [2]
10. Li Yuan Fangs: [2]


আজ পর্যন্ত বাংলাদেশ থ্রেডের সর্বোচ্চ ১০ জন পোস্টদাতাঃ
1. Crypto Library: [752]
2. Bd officer: [728]
3. God Of Thunder: [678]
4. DYING_S0UL: [648]
5. Little Mouse: [532]
6. Review Master: [459]
7. LDL: [367]
8. Z_MBFM: [314]
9. Shishir99: [290]
10. shasan: [247]

---

বাংলা থ্রেড এর একটিভিটি ওভার ভিউ
২০১৪ সাল থেকে শুরু করে ২০২৫ সালের অ্যাক্টিভিটি ওভারভিউ



জানুয়ারি মাসের অ্যাক্টিভিটি ২০২৬
ফেব্রুয়ারি মাসের একটিভিটি ২০২৬
মার্চ মাসের একটিভিটি ২০২৬
এপ্রিল মাসের একটিভিটি ২০২৬
মে মাসের একটিভিটি ২০২৬
জুন মাসের এক্টিভিটি ২০২৬
জুলাই মাসের এক্টিভিটি ২০২৬
আগস্ট মাসের এক্টিভিটি ২০২৬
সেপ্টেম্বর মাসের একটিভিট

এনাদের ক্রেডিট না দিলেই নয়
Ninjastic.Space -> TryNinja
Merit Dashboard -> DdmrDdmr  

---

---

---

I am pretty sure, if it was some random user, the account would have gotten stained by now but then again one could argue, reputation has it's perks.

With due respect, could you please help me find that evidence? Is it the password change?

I looked at the BRDB profile. Yes, there was a password change. But he changed his password several times over those two years. A password change alone doesn't prove a takeover, not without an email change. Remember: there was no 2FA back then. And ask yourself honestly, if his account had really been hacked, don’t you think he would have screamed it from the rooftops? He still holds the keys. He still controls that Bitcoin address himself. That isn’t "lost control." That's still his wallet. He can sign a message and recover anytime.

Well… if you can prove the account changed hands, then fine, blame the next owner. But did he ever say someone else took it over? Did he ever come clean and say "I was hacked" or "I sold it"?

Look at what is actually on the table

• Both accounts used Italian wording.
• Both accounts posted the same address.
  
• There was no email change.
  
• He never claimed the account was hacked or traded.
• His story is that a "friend" posted his address.

Doesn't "my friend used the account / the address" sound painfully familiar when multi-accounts get caught?

I have said this before, and I will say it again from the heart. You can trust him for the last few years of good behaviour if that's what you choose. That doesn't wash away what came before. Nobody has to red-tag him today for a scam from eight years ago. I am not asking for a witch hunt. I am asking for honesty. He is not some angel who never dirtied his hands. He's a bully this forum's DT network has covered for, year after year, while the rest of us were expected to look away.


All you need to check is what was quoted by OP from my thread.
The addition is this one - Look at the transaction below; both addresses from bitbollo and Cs87kxy are in the same input. There is no way he could say he doesn't own it.

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/87141eade85e9c7b669a6c15563b800cf3e4fd1bf84a8cec4c1fe8d24a878281

As for what the rest of the community thinks, this is not what you think.
The community is afraid of the consequences after the negative feedback. He is attacking anyone who doesn't agree with him.

bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts lovesmayfamilis DT1
bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts DireWolfM14 DT1
bitbollo DT1 distrusts nutildah DT1
bitbollo DT1 distrusts AB de Royse777 DT2
bitbollo DT1 distrusts Shishir99 DT2
bitbollo DT1 distrusts Little Mouse DT1
bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts DefaultTrust DT2

Time to unwatch this thread. This is my last post here (unless something of substance is brought to my attention and I might take a look).

I will not leave positive, neutral or negative trusts on any account because it is your demand. Likewise, I will never change my trust list to add nor exclude members because it is your demand.

What cannot be overlooked here is that you (rightly or wrongly) received negative tags from bitbollo and that severely hurt your ego and damaged your pride. You were driven by revenge and created this thread (after locking the previous one) but it seems to have not really helped your agenda at all.

For that reason, I am beginning to feel somewhat sorry for you. Take a break from the forum before you have a nervous breakdown. Or if you feel it is necessary to meet your post quota in order to be paid, then maybe post in different threads at least until you regain your (already very limited) cognitive abilities before posting here in future.

The only problem is that exact opposite of what you claim; he hasn't admitted that he was once in control of the Cs87kxy account.  However, there is evidence suggesting that he was not in control of that account when it went on to promote a ponzi.  So, in reality, it's a good thing that no DT member has tagged him, because that would only be demonstrating poor use of the red-tags. 

Worst case scenario, some one might want to neutral-tag him with that tidbit of information, but what would that really accomplish?
There's no evidence of account trading since a time when that was acceptable, and there's no evidence bitbollo himself was involved any attempt to scam.

Another ramble, another reply that is quite a fitting wall of text for a member of your post quality standard. What else was to be expected?

I already stated I cannot recall engaging with him before, we are not friends, we do not know each other. Keep your conspiracy theories to yourself.

There are phenomenal amounts of walls of text by both protagonists, it makes reading through the thread quite tedious. In your case, I have had you on my ignore list for a long time therefore it helps until I have to toggle the link in order to see what you are posting. Whether any member asked for a summary or otherwise, I will post here just as other members are free to post here too.

You created this thread in order to attack bitbollo because he gave you a negative tag. You did not care and do not care about the thread title (bitbollo is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser) other than you hope that he receives multiple tags because you have a problem with the negative tag he gave you. Digging up something from over a decade ago that he claims was already explained may or may not show him in a bad light but it certainly demonstrates desperation on your part.

Who are you, JollyGood?
Aren't you the same person who has been obsessed with AB de Royse for years? Aren't you the same person having double standards in every case? Aren't you the guy who gave scammer pakhitheboss a green pass? Aren't you the same guy who was defending BC game when you were in their campaign and later went against them once they switched the campaign manager? What have you done, Mr Almighty JollyGood?

It is obvious that I have started looking at his account once he left the negative tag on my account, which I posted myself here-
So, what new did you add in this thread? Did anyone ask you to write an overall summary?

Your own statement is contradictory. You admit that he needs to explain this, yet you demand to lock this thread.

Logic left the chat

Believe me, I have seen worse reputation threads created by you. You have been creating threads to expose newbies, Jr. Members, Members, and you have been hunting ghosts. The heavyweight forum members are participating in this thread, and it's far better than yours. You are just busy trying to save your buddy.

Failed?

Take a look at this - the true colour of a DT member.

bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts lovesmayfamilis DT1
bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts DireWolfM14 DT1
bitbollo DT1 distrusts nutildah DT1
bitbollo DT1 distrusts AB de Royse777 DT2
bitbollo DT1 distrusts Shishir99 DT2
bitbollo DT1 distrusts Little Mouse DT1
bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts DefaultTrust DT2

Frogbet.com - Little Mouse - Unpaid Review Reward - Stolen Deposit - FAIL ESCROW
September 21, 2026, 05:19:45 AM

2015 topic about spotify accounts right? And this is pertinent once there are a dozens of casino endorsed by the same campaign manager/group of users that ended with scam?
I don't see any death already, what did you mean exactly "condolences"?

Another proof about scam behaviour/support (likewise the whole threating topics are not another reason)
I have opened the scam accusation topic on September 21, 2026, 05:19:45 AM
Despite many comments, and a clear evidences they have never even come online @OP has the great idea to post a normal comment about wagering OF A SCAM WEBTITE


It was just not as "mediator" he has tried to hide this as an accident. It's not the only.

Frogbet has continued to scam EVEN after "they solved" with 100 USD. Yeah sure they scammed another 248 usd !
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594949.0
Still looking for "better contest idea" to promote a scammer

Look, I'll show you a similar situation that happened to you a few years ago.
There's an announcement about the sale of Spotify accounts.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=940800.0





You were the one who defended the seller very fiercely, while someone else accused him of being a fraud. But time has shown that you were protecting a scammer, and as soon as you learned this from your own experience, you left him a tag.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=411974

Why are you leaving the Shishir99 tag for the same thing? He participated in the feedback collection and was paid. Don't you see any similarities? You bought 20 accounts, and they all worked. Isn't that right? Is it worth putting a negative tag here for someone who had a different experience?


I don't want to go into other details, but if you want justice, then look at the situation more soberly. Should we condemn mediators?


Shishir99 acted as nothing more than a mediator.🤷‍♀️

That's right, I didn't write, but I tried to read, but these long quotes, and not following rule 32, which we, the old participants, ask newbies to follow, is simply maddening.

It all started with a rather stupid accusation, which was also not proven that you were an accomplice or someone else for the most ordinary offer to calm down. Anyone could get a similar tag if they accidentally fell under the "hot hand" of this DT. There is no direct evidence for leaving a tag; at the same time, there are those coincidences of addresses where hundreds of cheaters were caught on the forum.  Wasn't that how we went looking for all the cheaters? bitbollo was also keen on hunting down alts at one point.

The greatest sinner was once also innocent. There would be no problem admitting your mistakes. At the same time, in my country they say, "Tell me who your friend is, and I'll tell you who you are," if you take into account that he gave his account to a friend.. We are all human beings, and what happened ten years ago would not have been taken into account by many, simply because during that time the person showed himself on the good side.

But this man's hysteria is clearly present in both topics; I'm just drawing conclusions by removing him from the list of those who can be trusted.

I don't know if it's age🤷‍♀️. Many elderly people want to consider themselves infallible, giving lessons to the young, believing in their correctness so much that their mistakes are simply erased from their memory. I'm just guessing, nothing personal.

Definetely. That's why I have spent around 140 messages exposing a scam and getting harassed in public.

Frogbet has continued to scam EVEN after "they solved" with 100 USD. Yeah sure they scammed another 248 usd !
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594949.0

What is the sense to make transactions for thousands of dollars and can't open a scam accusation such evident?

It's evident you find funny many scams have been promoted here on forum and asking the same would not be seeing as productive
What has changed trying to offend my reputation posting a fabricated accuse using a full known address still used since 13 years?
NOTHING. These scam accusations about all of these scams advertised are still valid AND LIVE RIGHT NOW!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 NEW scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

You can just read all of my explanations, I give you too much importance replying all the time.

Why would someone use their known address, which they posted publicly, to receive funds from scams? You are an old-timer scammer, and you know how to escape the connection. You are asking people to show that your address received funds from a scam; this is a stupid demand. Bitcoin wallet is free; anyone can create a wallet, use it once to scam, and abandon it. You did the same.

However, you have been doing well in the last eight years. There is nothing to be afraid. No one is going to tag you for your scams, which you did a long time ago. So, it would be better to answer directly instead of writing thousands of off-topic words that don't carry any weight.

After being in this forum for all of these years, I don't see anything wrong on my profile to have the honor to receive such treatment

You are a liar. I never supported Frogbet or its scam. You were offended by this post and left negative feedback. I would ask the entire community to find how and where I supported Frogbet. If the majority agrees that I supported the scam with this post, I will leave the forum. Do you dare to do the same if they disagree?


Yeah, nothing really changed except for this.

bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts lovesmayfamilis DT1
bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts DireWolfM14 DT1
bitbollo DT1 distrusts nutildah DT1
bitbollo DT1 distrusts AB de Royse777 DT2
bitbollo DT1 distrusts Shishir99 DT2
bitbollo DT1 distrusts Little Mouse DT1
bitbollo DT1 no longer trusts DefaultTrust DT2

You are basically insulting the entire DT network for not doing anything against you. You are showing that they will be punished if anyone dares to speak against you. LOL.

Its time for another brief overview of local boards activity, and this time for August 2026.  All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and Bitlist.

Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet, but are part of this overview nevertheless.

---

Post activity per local board during August 2026

During August, 15130 posts were written across local boards, which is an increase compared to July's numbers (13938 posts). Majority of this increase happened on three most active boards, but some others like Spanish had noticeable increase compared to previous month. French unfortunately continued declining and now its maybe at all time low numbers, or very close to it.

---

Active members per local board during August 2026

Despite the increase in number of posts, active members went down from 1298 in July to 1265 in August. Nigerian boards keeps dominating this chart, with only Russian being somewhat close to them.

---

Local board members per amount of posts during August 2026

When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only 1 post in their board during last month, leader is French board with 80% of such members, while at the same time Croatian had the lowest percentage, only 11%.

At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is Greek board with 56% while French had only 13% of such members.

Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, leader is Croatian board with 56% while French had only 7%.

---

Merit shared per local board during August 2026

During August, 7218 merit was sent across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, and is a big increase compared to July's numbers (5818). Majority of this increase happened on Germna board, that went from 612 merit sent in July to 1510 in August, almost beating Nigerians at the top.

---

Merit/Post ratio per local board during August 2026

In May, an average merit per post across local boards was 0.48, which is an increase compared to July's 0.42 merit per post. This time we have Polish board sticking out, but as seen from their last 12 month ratio, last month's was just an exception, and such a big difference can happen on less active boards.

---

Merit senders and receivers per local board during August 2026

During last month, 562 members sent while 598 received merit which is an expected increase compared to July (509 senders, 588 receivers). Needless to say which local boards dominates this chart as well.

---

Percentage of merited posts across local boards during August 2026

Romanian board remained at the top of this chart with very high 58% of merited posts, but Italian also has a high number, especially considering the fact that its one of the more active local boards on the forum.

---

---

Merit per transaction across local boards during August 2026

And for the end of this series of charts, the one that shows meriting habits of local boards, which (as you can see) differs from board to board.

---

The most active members per local board during August 2026

This time top 3 most active local boards members all come from the same board, Russian. klarki is at the top with 162, while jokers10 and numberal both wrote 135 posts.  GG.

Russian	|	German	|	Turkish	|	Italian	|	Portuguese	|	Spanish	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. klarki [162]	|	1. cygan [74]	|	1. mandown [113]	|	1. Italian Panic [48]	|	1. joker_josue [127]	|	1. famososMuertos [58]	|
2. jokers10 [135]	|	2. Soonandwaite [70]	|	2. MK-74 [69]	|	2. Ale88 [44]	|	2. sabotag3x [109]	|	2. darbitmobilerecovery [52]	|
3. Numeral [135]	|	3. 5tift [60]	|	3. yenerbatmaz [67]	|	3. babo [43]	|	3. bitmover [79]	|	3. Don Pedro Dinero [40]	|
4. safar1980 [123]	|	4. mole0815 [59]	|	4. Hvdv [67]	|	4. fillippone [43]	|	4. TryNinja [67]	|	4. Porfirii [33]	|
5. Julien_Olynpic [90]	|	5. MinoRaiola [58]	|	5. kriminall [63]	|	5. Plutosky [34]	|	5. rdluffy [42]	|	5. Filicius [27]	|
6. internetional [87]	|	6. MaxMueller [58]	|	6. Phoenix Anka [62]	|	6. Ultimo2 [26]	|	6. alegotardo [42]	|	6. airbin [22]	|
7. mak013 [78]	|	7. jahead [56]	|	7. Xyloo [62]	|	7. bitbollo [25]	|	7. Forsyth Jones [41]	|	7. danadc [18]	|
8. tvplus006 [78]	|	8. Lakai01 [52]	|	8. emrecemsan [60]	|	8. alexrossi [22]	|	8. mikel_012 [40]	|	8. darxiaomi [13]	|
9. zasad@ [68]	|	9. Unknown01 [42]	|	9. Mustang Shelby [60]	|	9. gbianchi [18]	|	9. diggler [27]	|	9. RobertCG1990 [7]	|
10. klarki_mobile [55]	|	10. Real-Duke [36]	|	10. RaltcoinsB [59]	|	10. bitcoiner180 [16]	|	10. r_victory [27]	|	10. Artemis3 [6]	|

[/table[

```

Indonesian	|	French	|	Pilipinas	|	Croatian	|	Nigerian	|	Arabic	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. Chikito [105]	|	1. winspiral [13]	|	1. blockman [57]	|	1. slackovic [53]	|	1. Floxynice [78]	|	1. khaled0111 [39]	|
2. joniboini [55]	|	2. Benhouse [5]	|	2. Peanutswar [36]	|	2. Daniel91 [45]	|	2. Karl_3000 [77]	|	2. Kavelj22 [33]	|
3. mu_enrico [48]	|	3. TryNinja [4]	|	3. rbynxx [33]	|	3. katanic97 [41]	|	3. Africolo [54]	|	3. yhiaali3 [27]	|
4. taufik123 [44]	|	4. Danydee [1]	|	4. tech30338 [31]	|	4. ovcijisir [31]	|	4. TrialBitcoin [48]	|	4. OmegaStarScream [14]	|
5. masulum [42]	|	5. Delaforetnoire [1]	|	5. coin-investor [29]	|	5. Rikafip [29]	|	5. CryptopreneurBrainboss [47]	|	5. hugeblack [12]	|
6. Husna QA [40]	|	6. Halab [1]	|	6. GreatArkansas [28]	|	6. Pmalek [24]	|	6. PremiumcryptoHub [47]	|	6. ObeyKnock [6]	|
7. Luzin [36]	|	7. EXMON [1]	|	7. PX-Z [27]	|	7. cryptofrka [16]	|	7. Qhunman [47]	|	7. aseemhamza [3]	|
8. abhiseshakana [33]	|	8. G.Seed [1]	|	8. arwin100 [26]	|	8. examplens [14]	|	8. Samuel47 [47]	|	8. GxSTxV [2]	|
9. ryzaadit [30]	|	9. fagsosugym7314 [1]	|	9. cryptoaddictchie [26]	|	9. Trofo [13]	|	9. Hypnotizer [45]	|	9. Danydee [1]	|
10. AakZaki [28]	|	10. AL1CE M [1]	|	10. bhadz [23]	|	10. dkbit98 [10]	|	10. Mayor of ogba [44]	|	10. ajmnt [1]	|

Polish	|	Indian	|	Greek	|	Romanian	|	Pakistan	|	Bengali	|
_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|	_________________	|
1. cygan [13]	|	1. Bitcoin Smith [43]	|	1. cryptosize [35]	|	1. GazetaBitcoin [25]	|	1. Fragrance1122 [56]	|	1. Review Master [25]	|
2. TryNinja [4]	|	2. JSRAW [42]	|	2. BlackHatCoiner [30]	|	2. TryNinja [4]	|	2. qurbanshah02 [47]	|	2. Crypto Library [25]	|
3. pawel7777 [3]	|	3. Cointikka [42]	|	3. alani123 [7]	|	3. fillippone [4]	|	3. JunaidAzizi [43]	|	3. Bd officer [25]	|
4. EXMON [1]	|	4. eaLiTy [24]	|	4. Ultegra134 [3]	|	4. NeuroticFish [1]	|	4. HustleZ [34]	|	4. DYING_S0UL [16]	|
	|	5. pawanjain [18]	|	5. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|	5. jedaite [1]	|	5. Junii [33]	|	5. Shishir99 [12]	|
	|	6. hasan5jan7 [18]	|	6. BitcoinsGreece [2]	|	6. snaz3d [1]	|	6. AgriTrack [33]	|	6. Nothingtodo [11]	|
	|	7. Nrcewker [8]	|	7. Conqueror777 [2]	|	7. Zeeloth [1]	|	7. Abdul Sami786 [33]	|	7. Z_MBFM [11]	|
	|	8. TheUltraElite [5]	|	8. mastercryptogr [1]	|	8. BimboDev [1]	|	8. Cheema02 [29]	|	8. Royal Cap [7]	|
	|	9. M47AK16 [5]	|	9. dracarysvlr [1]	|		|	9. Nmjut [27]	|	9. NNRR [5]	|
	|	10. GazetaBitcoin [3]	|		|		|	10. GbitG [25]	|	10. God Of Thunder [4]	|

Exactly. The account wasn't hacked, and it did not change hands either. The seclog doesn't show anything like that.

---

Interesting. If I am not wrong, lovesmayfamilis did not post in any of these threads. Since she removed him from her trust list, bitbollo removed her as well.



This proved that he is willing to retaliate against anyone who doesn't agree with him.

It would have easier if he did agreed with this that he owns that account and later he sold it or changed hands. But there is no incident like this , if happens he would have agree with it. You're basically giving him the idea of a scope.


Ring any bell? This type of incident not new on this forum.
Let's assume the account has changed the hands why tf this dumb head is refusing every single words anyone has to say. I even provided the on chain data, he is refusing that he did not do any transactions.

Maybe as a pharmacist he needs therapy for forgetting important stuff like this.

Shishir99 just wanted a clear answer for that reason I found something yet he denied every word by word and you guys are defending just because the incident was 8 year's ago , lol  hypocrisy.

[he]

A simple statement he took it to 5 page .

What a gentleman, you insult me when I didn't insult you. Only people in trouble insult me.

In fact, I have a red tag. I'm not complaining, I deserved this. You deserve red tags too.

And wasn't it said that trusts are for trades? Why did you ever red-tag Shishir99? Did you make trades or did you red-tag him just because you didn't like him! You're an abuser and you should be punished like all abusers, just like I was.

So you want txid , you would have said it first. Unfortunately I've turned off my PC. Even if I provided the txid you would have denied it lol. That's why thought any reputated member would provide it Since it's a serious allegation.

Now tell me there is no one , but no one has been connected to that user  who is accused for ponzi scam but you're connected. Why all these co incidents are happening today?

---

Don't worry I will provide txid tomorrow if no one had done it.


Some are left lol, step bro , step sis, step mom. Friends wife .

Obviously he's talking bullshit, guys.
People have been red-tagged for this reason. Now if the DTs are honest people, they should tag this guy.
Otherwise the trust system only works when people like it.

We need to demonstrate that it works always and for everyone.

Lets be clear. You are not showing that these address have been used for a scam or have received funds related to scam.
This is an impressive serious allegation that has no sense ahd even 10 years ago it was evident it wasn't me.
If you can prove I have received or used one of this address for cheating someone please share it here.
if in the last 12 years no one has ever commented about ANY connection with scam it was just because I was never involved and the evidence... is here
You can't post any transaction just make a pure speculation based on nothing.
Without a valid txid proving I have received a single satoshi for a scam we can consider for another time Shishir99 a completely liar and totally untrusted user.

It's still a bullshit a totally lie and even if you are trying to use fucking event old 10 years old that was posted by Avirunes!
This address have never received any fund related any of these scam.
If you are not proving this you are just continue to defame my person for have exposing a scam.

Can you show only 1 transaction of some users has received funds? 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2 has received scam funds?
Ok prove it. You are a liar thats all.

Can you post just one single satoshi received as scam from one of my address?
Or the connection with 29 alt accounts?
Or the connection with secondstrade.com?

Or it was a change address that has just provided to a friend on 2015 for registering on forum and then he has never posted again?
Have you verified those fucking liar and bullshit man?
If those shit you're saying to me was true, this address was posted also once they was making the scam just to answer to @Rifakip
I have always supported other users this not means that having one address without transaction of scams - means I am scammer! It's a complete retard accusation.

You continue to defame my username just to prove my theory.
You are just taking two different arguments, after 10 years, trying to defaming my account.
None of my address have ever received any funds of any scam or ponzi. Still you can't show any real transaction but you're inventing transaction.
I haven't nothing to explain more, this is a fucking serious infamous allegation completely forged and even using no real transaction from any scam website.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month


This will be my last message on the forum on the argument.
Can you post just one single satoshi received as scam from one of my address?
Or the connection with 29 alt accounts?
Or the connection with secondstrade.com?
How many time I need to defend alone my self from all these blatant non sense rage accuse?
At this point anyone can decide to trust your comments based on 0 evidences of fraudolent transaction or 3 topics of proof I have just exposed a scam and scammers!

I have already answered and I continue to point about the evidence of retard accuse



Stop to say bullshit. I continue to wonder what is the level this defamation has reached.
$7.2k is not small amount. --> [ On 2018, the value of Bitcoin was approximately $8,269.81 ] --- this is the value of today!

This is just a fabricated accusation and this qualify the level of the accuser. If it was true that this address has received ever only 1 cent of any ponzi or scam it was also evident it was quoted 10 years ago and not now (using randomly the last transaction it has)

None of my address has been ever used for a scam or receiving funds. These are fucking serious allegation completely unproven.
Come on another attempt to harass me but ANYONE can verify that you have fabricated a scam proof.

Including the use of 29 alt accounts and to be the operators of secondstrade I think you have reached the top level of bullshitter for this year.

You can continue to post all of these fake accuses because these connections are all fake https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5595318.msg67187983#msg67187983
and I have posted here evidence of my effort in DirectBet competition. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5595318.msg67187998#msg67187998
Strangely I arrive 2nd as top better with bitbollo account it would be hard to follow a competition with 29 accounts

Even if you are trying to harass me posting fake connections old 11 years, including the accuse to being the operator of secondstrade, anyone could just verify in your profile why you have such interest to bring (a complete off topic with a non - scam accusation topic) in reputation section.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

Please don't try to force your opinion on me. I’ve examined the information regarding Directbet in detail and see it as a fabrication—a set of data that, in your view, might pass for the truth. As for citing addresses, I’ve already stated my position clearly and unequivocally. But if you want to talk about the past, Lauda would have flagged your account too.

My point is that mentioning suchmoon - or Lauda, ​​for that matter - is completely pointless and adds absolutely no weight to words.

secondstrade.com
Are we seriously talking ? So I am also secondstrade.com right? But anyone has a minimum sense on supporting these accuse?

"bitbollo probably owns more than a hundred accounts"
since one hundreds was too heavy they have updated to "a dozen" - 29 to be exactly.

At a certain point, the only way for derail from these scam accusatin is always the same.
Harrass me and continue to not answer to scam accusation:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

We worked togheter before for your project and we were in contact in the private messages plus telegram messages so i think you know that im legit and that you can confirm it. I was even in your signature campaigns before.

Im shocked that im connected to other accounts and i have been on the forum for so long

We had may private message exchanged between us for Casino Critique project. You had hard time finding your seed and it took a long time to settle the things. I have good feeling about you.

The connection obviously came from here:
And I would like to believe you are not a part of the farm. Maybe you can tell the story better if you remember or maybe at least something so that everyone can conclude it was a mistake.

Thanks Joca97. They are just trying to find a way to defame my username after I have opened a scam accusation.

Moreover, 28 guys of the forum, did you remember the beautiful years / competition of Direct bet?
These "users" are accusing that I have used all of you for "defrauding and abuse" Directbet competition.
the accuse is irrilevant and retard, I would hope that some of you can directly confirm that we have never had any kind of interaction before.

This confirm 100% the accusation/red trust on @OP. He has posted another compeltely non sense topic, he is not a reliable user. He has FORGED fake information - create fake connections only to discret my username, only as retiliation activity after I have exposed a scam.


bump - 29 alt accounts connected to me - just to see the quality of accuse they are using!
scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser ! What a shit that has become bitcointalk lets be honest also with "OG GUYS".

[/quote]

bump - 29 alt accounts connected to me - just to see the quality of accuse they are using!
scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser ! What a shit that has become bitcointalk lets be honest also with "OG GUYS".

I see this as a defence strategy which, as we have already seen in other cases, involves focusing on the least important issues.

Perhaps a few of the 28 guys aren’t his alts, but the most serious accusation is this:

Listen, anyone with a minimum of brain would see as completely stupid bringing an accuse that I have 29 altaccounts including Joca97.
If you would have another topic for harassing me go ahead but I would not waste time replying to these messages already quoted.
Yes this was already posted, it's evident you have no idea how it was bitcoin and that time.

@LoyceV
Yes sure, you can see how these are completely untrusted users, just check "List of the accounts that bitbollo used to abuse the Directbet.eu tipster competition."

By the way, Shishir99, I think you should lock the other thread, so he doesn't keep posting his rubbish there.

He can reopen his flag thread if he wants to keep posting there.

Here he keeps posting off-topic, and if he is going to keep that way without addressing the concrete accusations, I am going to report him. But I am afraid, knowing how moderation works here, that reports are going to remain unhandled.

Shishir99 lol that something interesting you dig up.

bitbollo what's ur excuse now? Tell me . Now let me tell u what was the excuse here. You forget to change the wallet and copied your alt account wallet.

There's no way you can convince me that someone had just copied wrong wallet after 2months.

Now don't put a blind eye on this and judge according to rule , unless you have some favorism towards your guy.

I don't understand what's the big deal about red trust ratings anyway.

If most DT members don't agree with the trust rating, it doesn't affect anything anyway. I mean what difference does it make if 9 out of 10 campaign managers don't a problem with hiring Shishir99 in their campaigns? That rating effectively becomes a note from some guy. Yes that guy is a DT member too and it is worth reading but since many people (probably most) don't agree with it, it is practically ineffective and we can see that in the recent change of trust lists.

It is the heavy bombarding of red trust ratings (and flags with heavy support) on a profile that moves something.

I am not forum staff. I'm just a guy hired to do a job who doesn't like seeing your red trust on Shishir99. Even if I was staff, it wouldn't make a difference. I'd still disagree with your use of the trust system, and it would be wrong not to do anything about it.

I really don't understand what you think you're accomplishing here. You've tangled too many pieces and they're only held together by rage. If you want to fight corruption or whatever, you'd be much more effective if your message was delivered calmly and rationally.

Just to have a look, this is another guy they are "defending" - pay attention there is forum staff involved on harsh defense including distrust !
YEAH here there is a scam, here there is support made by the scammer, and the untrusted guy has become me


I don't know how it's possible to trust someone that say so much bullshit!
You posted in the frogbet thread and in the scam accusation both after 1 week they have stolen the funds and after there was a full page of proof posted!


AGAIN other proof

What great message has posted "Shisir99" ? Continue to shill the casino!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.msg67164618#msg67164618
Sockpappet continue to ask the same and the same!

If I have balls
I have quitted elementary school, I would not say to some one "if you have the balls".
Since you have already proved to have not you must address your bet of 5K USD. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177548#msg67177548
It's evident that your words have no value. Literally.  It's all explained in the same post you're quoting.

Your last post has defined a well known scam site as "doing terribly" yeah maybe now they will improve the reputation so can scam more!
He has continued to search "better idea for the contest" . Yeah a contest of scammers

What does LM have to do with them? Write clearly. Frogbet is a scam; what now? What should LM do now? The campaign has ended, and he is not working for them once the scam is confirmed. What now?

Quote the post instead of pasting links. What is he supposed to address in public? What evidence are you talking about? Scam? Yes, let's say they are a scam now. But was the site a scam before he started the campaign? Please answer straight instead of writing a bunch of bullshit arguments.


What do I have to do with the frogbet? Am I forced to talk about the frogbet fake traffic? Why? Did I promoted them in my sigature? Do I work for them? Answer the questions straight if you have balls.

LOL now I am trolling.
After we have reached 11 pages of evidences this user has the courage to write:

LOL Coldcard too, yogg too, FTX, Mtgox dozens of these site can be listed and they have been all related a scam.
They are not just doing terribly they are just scammers and continue to depict this as an error confirm that this a support of the scam.
As mentioned here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67181937#msg67181937


As been already proved, it's like 10 days they have avoid to address this in public. Here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67182111#msg67182111 again last proof.
You continue to not see evidences but writing non-sense to justify your stupid defense of this scam.

LOL Trolling? Why not comment on fake traffic of the site "that is doing terribly" ?
You have never replied to my accusation but just trying to offend me in all way possible. Thats again another more confirmation my red trust has been definetely appropriate.

This is a petty reason to leave a red tag on somebody. He didn't even say what you're claiming he said. You misunderstood the context of Shishir99's metaphor and are using your misconception as the grounds for a red trust. Your interpretation of his behaviors is not shared by anybody else.

These are not good reasons to leave a red trust on an otherwise productive forum member. Its an overblown response based more in emotion than reason. The first point is a non-issue. You are blowing things out of proportion by equating it with non-trustworthiness. The second point can happen to anybody. Its a continuance of promoting a scam after clear warning signs have been established that should matter. I do not consider Shishir99's actions to be indications of untrustworthiness, nor do most others who have bothered to chime in so far.

I'm not going to ask you to consider removing the red trust on that account in particular. You should want to do it because its the right thing to do.

Sure. Don't trust verify. I have provided dozens of proofs and explained clearly why these users deserve a red trust. If you don't trust me it's ok but you cannot pretend we have to not warning users before they read other suggestions about "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"


I can continue to quote endless the same and same answers that definetely explain why there is a specific trust rating.
Bitcoin is based on evidences, opinions are worth zero But it's more easy provide OPINIONS and SKIPS EVIDENCE AND FACTS.

We have just reached 10 pages of the scam. Despite an entire topic to harrass and defame my person - and not to address the scam accusation - same users involved continue to have "better idea on how to works with scammers".

What is a better, a selection of scam of the pasts, or wait a few weeks for the next scam?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

While the other tags and flags are debatable, the red tag on Shishir99 is clearly a reactive overreach. Its not necessary; thus it is still a problem.


I just read the whole thread and it appears to be a case of attacking the messenger, who had a very valid message... even if it was delivered annoyingly, and perhaps in direct contradiction with a prior moral stance. Maybe you're right, but the evidence at this point is mostly anecdotal.

Can I read some evidences and not just "in my opinion"?  I have explained why all of these red tag are appropriate. Read just the proofs, after 9 pages of "it's all true" what is "sufficient for you"?

Insufficient you mean that I need to post another 5 scam of the last 12 months and you have also evaluated this scam "live right now" ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67174787#msg67174787  

Just Asking because I can understand that maybe once there 10 scams "that can be recognized in 2 minutes" someone will say "insufficient" ... why not 15 scams to be scammer? or 20? Or I don't know, how many cards has to peel @yogg to be a scammer? Or cold card, how many hardware need to fail? LOL I love double standards.

Matthew Breetzke is in the team to replace Dewald Brevis and he has performed well whenever he got the opportunity as he scored his second ODI century today and they are building a good bench strength.

Australia is currently batting as if they are targeting well over 350 runs. They just lost their second wicket, and if they play sensible cricket without losing many wickets, then they will easily chase this score with the way they are batting.

I agree with the views expressed; the reasons cited previously are insufficient to support that flag. LM did not intend to breach or harm the contract (the issue arose from negligence) so I oppose that flag.

The same applies to @Shishir99's situation. I do not know @bitbollo, but I would kindly ask him to remove that negative rating.

---

Regarding LM, this is the second case where hasty decision-making has led to such a situation; a "neutral" or "negative" trust rating might be warranted. However, changing your projects management approach—such as delaying release escrow until you have verified that everything is correct—is the right way to shift that negative trust to neutral.

If you had to create a thread to discuss your negative feedback, it would have been more appropriate to focus on that rather than the sarcasm. It seems as though you only created this thread because your feelings and/or ego was hurt by what bitbollo wrote. As for the matter of the tag, if it were me I would have left a neutral at most. Having said that, if bitbollo sees you as a shill for a scammer and has left a negative tag that is his decision and if he faces any consequences in return (trust exclusion or tags) then that is a matter I am sure and he has already contemplated.

I cannot recall engaging with you before (except maybe once or twice very briefly) but keeping that aside, you deserve a lot of credit for creating this thread even though you probably knew you would have to defend yourself against two campaign managers that are well known for helping/supporting each other whenever the need arises.

You had a principle regardless of the amounts of money involved and you took action even though you knew you were going to get some pushback from other members in this thread. I think you deserve a lot of credit for taking action and then for standing by what you believe in regardless of what possible drama were to unfold.

As the situation currently stands, certain campaign managers are taking on any project for the sake of adding it to their portfolio. Clearly Hhampuz and icopress apply due-diligence in ways that others do not, their standard is probably far too high for some others to compete with.

We are not perfect, mistakes can be made and scams might inadvertently be promoted too but strict due-diligence should be applied by campaign managers. Royse777 continued to promote the Sinbad mixer even after I created a thread stating that it was going to be shutdown as authorities had traced millions from another money laundering mixer was used to launch it by the same owner. After Sinbad was seized, mixers were banned from the forum. Had Royse777 cancelled the campaign, maybe mixers would not have been banned at that time. It remains possible that mixers could have been banned at a later date but that does not account for the incompetence and gross negligence shown by Royse777 at the time.

Over 99% of the accounts posting in this forum are only here because want to monetise their accounts via signature campaigns. If other opportunities arose from bounties, contests, competitions and free lucky draws as well as paid participation threads then that would be deemed as a bonus. The vast majority of those campaign participants would not care if they were promoting a scam or not (and would not even stop promoting it even if they were convinced it was a scam). Also, we have no idea how many are farmed accounts and how they are affecting the forum.

Let us not avoid one obvious fact, Royse777 and Little Mouse have nothing bad to state about each other and they seem to aid each other when questions against either one of them are raised. From what it seems,