Last update: 2026-10-23_Fri_11.36h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
Shishir99 receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
nobody
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "Shishir99" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67268078 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Fri Oct 23 11:33:13 CEST 2026) in My own reputation thread regarding my loans on the forum:
Come on, guys,
Don't be like Shishir99. Shishir99 has been creating many threads lately over nothing and has been called out by other forum members. Shishir99 has been told to shut up and ignore some specific forum members.
Now I see you guys don't follow the same suggestion. Please don't fight over nothing. I was just a nobody and spoke against a forum elite, while both of you are somewhat heavyweight forum members.
Personally, I would be curious about the status of the loan as well. I don't think someone has to be a spammer to ask if the loan was repaid or if it is still unpaid.
2. Post 67267503 (unedited backup) (by Little Mouse) (scraped on Fri Oct 23 06:15:25 CEST 2026) in [OPEN] Shuffle.com | Next Generation Crypto Casino | Signature Campaign:
Week#162 payment has been processed- 2236081d5e2a629109bfc9bdc9273692731d3882d4e35b0297bfa722d81b70dc
Rank- Legendary
Segwit BTC address- bc1qzttaatxpk60dtxex7g830tea3m9uq3fuvknmrh
Accepted. Please wear signature, avatar and DM me your post count.
3. Post 67264225 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Thu Oct 22 11:53:55 CEST 2026) in Brief monthly overview of the local board activity:
Here comes another brief overview of the local board activity, this time for September 2026. All charts and table are made using data from @DdmrDdmr
Merit Dashboard and BitList.
Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Bengali) don't have their own local boards yet.
Post activity per local board during September 2026In the above mentioned period, 14365 posts were made across local boards, which is a decrease compared to August numbers (15130). Nigerian remained by far the most active board, followed by Russian and Turkish. On the other side of the chart, french is slowly decreasing and its only the matter of the before they end up at the bottom.
Active members per local board during September 2026During September 1250 members were active on local boards, which is an decrease compared to month before numbers (1265). I kinda expected it to incrase since summer is over, but maybe these recent sig bans have something to do with it.
Local board members per amount of posts during September 2026 When it comes to the percentage of members who wrote only one post in their board during February, leader is French local board with 47%, while at the same time Nigerian had only 10% of such members.
At the 2-9 posts bracket leader is again French local with 53% while Croatian board had only 18%.
Regarding the 10+ posts bracket, the leader is Pakistan with 64% while French board had no members that wrote 10+ posts during last month.
Merit shared per local board during September 2026During September, 6008 merit was shared across 18 local boards that are part of this overview, which is a noticeable drop compared to August number (7218). Vast majority of this drop happened on German local, that went from 1510 merit sent in August to only 482 in September. They are known for these amplitudes and I expect their number to be much different next month.
Merit/Post ratio per local board during September 2026An average merit per post ratio for all local boards during September was 0.42 which is an expected drop compared to August 0.48. This time Spanish is at the top with a very high 1.67 merit per post, but Romanian is not that far behind with 1.48. On the other side of the chart French unfortunately keeps decreasing and is at the bottom.
Merit senders and receivers per local board during September 2026543 members sent while 588 received merit, which is a small decrease compared to month before (562 senders, 598 receivers).
Percentage of merited posts across local boards during September 2026Romanian board remained at the top as usual with an extremely high 70% of merited posts, with everyone else being far behind.
Merit per transaction across local boards during September 2026And the last in this series of charts, merit per transaction, that shows meriting habits of local boards. Interestingly, French is at the top here.
The most active members per local board during September 2026Last but not the least in this monthly overview, the list of the most active members per local board. klarki and jokers10 from Russian local are at the first two spots, while mandown from Turkish is at the 3rd spot. GG guys!
4. Post 67263630 (unedited backup) (by [btc]) (scraped on Thu Oct 22 08:45:13 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's reputation thread:
But I am sure you did not dig that much when you picked that name, right?
Let me put it this way: if I would have known I'd still be using the same name more than 11 years later, I would have put a bit more thought into it
I think that 10 years ago, many of us didn't think much about it. Now, it's about moving forward and continuing.
What's in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name, would smell as sweet.
5. Post 67263576 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Thu Oct 22 08:28:55 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's reputation thread:
But I am sure you did not dig that much when you picked that name, right?
Let me put it this way: if I would have known I'd still be using the same name more than 11 years later, I would have put a bit more thought into it
I think that 10 years ago, many of us didn't think much about it. Now, it's about moving forward and continuing.
I think that to this day, the best person who knew how to choose a good nickname was Satoshi, congratulations to him.
6. Post 67262072 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Wed Oct 21 10:10:07 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's reputation thread:
But I am sure you did not dig that much when you picked that name, right?
Let me put it this way: if I would have known I'd still be using the same name more than 11 years later, I would have put a bit more thought into it
7. Post 67261941 (unedited backup) (by libert19) (scraped on Wed Oct 21 09:08:37 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's reputation thread:
This is my revelation and I hesitantly present you all, in case you had this curiosity too.
In case you already knew, good for you. Feel free to scroll past. Thank you.
I think this is the first time I am reading it correctly. I always read it as LoyceVenezuela.
First time I read it, I also read it as if it's, 'Venezuela', then I double checked.
I don't know if LoyceV chose his username from the email address, but I think he somewhere explained how he chose his username.
I remember he somewhere mentioned, he generated random name from some random name generator website, so he must have created email based upon it and not the other way around.
8. Post 67261420 (unedited backup) (by libert19) (scraped on Wed Oct 21 01:18:43 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Some of the moderators' actions really convinced me to think that they care about who reported the posts. They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
FWIW, I have reported 390 posts, except 3 recent reports (which were marked as, 'good') all were made ages ago, back when my account was absolute nobody and stats are following:
https://talkimg.com/image/UxeSzmThis leads me to say, mods aren't partial towards
who makes the report. Now, fair disclaimer, this is my personal experience and doesn't reflect that same may be case for everybody.
I am even of the opinion that moderators shouldn't know who reported a post. They should only see the report and judge based on that particular post reported such that there won't be an accusation of bias.
Sounds good. But, what are chances that malicious people will bombard the mods with unnecessary reports? Having username to the side may be helps a bit with that?
In the additional idea to curb spam thread, someone suggested that a user should be sig banned when an x number of DT members report their post. But I disagreed that it should be when an x number of reports are made, irrespective of who reported.
I am not sure if DT members report posts in first place but yeah not fan of this idea. Agreed with the emphasized part though.
However, I wouldn't feel bad if a moderator's decision favour's an OG who has made over 1000 good reports over me. It is expected that he that made thousands of good reports should be right 90% times they report. So, moderators can quickly agree with established members and quality posters than they will do with a random poster.
Nah, they should solely take action based on each individual report and context provided.
9. Post 67260332 (unedited backup) (by MarryWithBTC) (scraped on Tue Oct 20 19:55:49 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Some of the moderators' actions really convinced me to think that they care about who reported the posts. They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
FWIW, I have reported 390 posts, except 3 recent reports (which were marked as, 'good') all were made ages ago, back when my account was absolute nobody and stats are following:
https://talkimg.com/image/UxeSzmThis leads me to say, mods aren't partial towards
who makes the report. Now, fair disclaimer, this is my personal experience and doesn't reflect that same may be case for everybody.
I am even of the opinion that moderators shouldn't know who reported a post. They should only see the report and judge based on that particular post reported such that there won't be an accusation of bias.
In the additional idea to curb spam thread, someone suggested that a user should be sig banned when an x number of DT members report their post. But I disagreed that it should be when an x number of reports are made, irrespective of who reported.
However, I wouldn't feel bad if a moderator's decision favour's an OG who has made over 1000 good reports over me. It is expected that he that made thousands of good reports should be right 90% times they report. So, moderators can quickly agree with established members and quality posters than they will do with a random poster.
10. Post 67259144 (unedited backup) (by libert19) (scraped on Tue Oct 20 14:24:19 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Some of the moderators' actions really convinced me to think that they care about who reported the posts. They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
FWIW, I have reported 390 posts, except 3 recent reports (which were marked as, 'good') all were made ages ago, back when my account was absolute nobody and stats are following:
https://talkimg.com/image/UxeSzmThis leads me to say, mods aren't partial towards
who makes the report. Now, fair disclaimer, this is my personal experience and doesn't reflect that same may be case for everybody.
11. Post 67258879 (unedited backup) (by Xiestar) (scraped on Tue Oct 20 12:59:55 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
If you consider his posts on-topic, then my replies to his posts are supposed to be on-topic as well. If he was addressing the main topic, so am I. The Moderators are deleting my replies to his posts while his posts are still there. I feel like they are just telling me to shut up. If you delete my posts because it was off-topic, then how are his posts addressing the main topic?
Bitbollo is just using his experience on other casinos on Biggerz existing scam issue too although elaborating it on detailed manner is already a bit exaggerated and spammy but still on topic.
Discussing around that premise is a different matter because it will derail the original topic of that thread, hence off-topic.
Ignoring him is the right call here. It will save you so much energy that you are using rn to this negativity. FYI, I had a conflict with Bitbollo a long time ago. I just ignore him since no one can remove his trust feedback except him. No amount of distrust can remove his negative feedback regardless if he is not a DT anymore.
12. Post 67257291 (unedited backup) (by AVE5) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 23:36:08 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Some of the moderators' actions really convinced me to think that they care about who reported the posts. They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
To support my claim, I am giving you some examples.
Also believe it that your prove according to the claims might probably not be enough to convince everyone, especially those that may be of the same views as those set of moderator's you think that are not doing the forum moderating duties properly.
If we come to think of it in the right order, I doubt if there was to be necessity of the moderators haven to check user's level in the forum before attending to their report's.
Don't be surprised that some of those members who hadn't really been participanting on discussions in the forum could claim that they've built experiences on reading more than making Post's which is determined by their activity counts in the forum.
When such members make some post, you're probably seeing their rank still low but their posts are being constructive with good qualities.
So I'll say that checking the contents and informations of the user's reports should be more important than considering the user's activity counts, rank rate or visibilities.
13. Post 67257076 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 22:28:43 CEST 2026) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
আমার কাছে একাধিক এড্রেস হ্যান্ডেল করা প্যারা লাগে ভাই। আমি জন্মের পর থেকে সেই সেইম এড্রেসই ব্যবহার করে আসতেছি। বিষয়টা একটু সারকাস্টিক টোনে বল্লাম বাট এটাই রিয়েলিটি। ইভেন আমি সেকেন্ড এড্রেসও ইউজ করিনা। অনেকে হয়তো এড্রেস A - এড্রেস B - তারপর সেন্ট্রালাইজ এক্সচেঞ্জে পার করে। বাট আমি অলওয়েজ প্রাইমারি এড্রেস টু এক্সচেঞ্জে পার করি। যত তত পেমেন্ট আছে সবই ঐ সেইম জায়গাতেই জমা হয়। বারবার সেইম এড্রেস ব্যবহার করলে প্রাইভেসির হোগামারা হয়ে যায়, জানি, বাট তারপরও করি। আমি আসলে অলস কিসিমের মানুষ। আবার নতুন এড্রেস, নতুন সিডফ্রেস, নতুন ব্যাকআপ, কি এক জ্বালা।
আমার ধারণা আপনি একা এটা করেন না, ফোরামের প্রায় বেশিরভাগ মানুষ এভাবেই ব্যাবহার করে। অনেকে তো সরাসরি এক্সচেঞ্জ এর এড্রেস ব্যাবহার করে, যেটা আসলে খুবই রিস্কি কারবার। এটা করলে আজকে বা কালকে যদি এক্সচেঞ্জ আপনার একাউন্ট ফ্ল্যাগ করে বলে সোর্স অফ ফান্ড এর প্রুফ দিতে, তখন ধরা খেয়ে যাবেন। যদিও সেইফ থাকার জন্য এড্রেস A থেকে এড্রেস B তে নেয়া সবচাইতে ভালো প্র্যাকটিস, তবে মিক্সার রিলেটেড পেমেন্ট না থাকলে একটা এড্রেসে রিসিভ করে তারপর এক্সচেঞ্জ এ সেন্ড করলেও তেমন সমস্যা সাধারণত হয় না। এভাবেই অনেকে ব্যাবহার করে আসছে।
ফোরাম মেম্বারদের সাথে আগে টুকিটাকি লেনদেন করতাম, তবে এখন আর কারো সাথে লেনদেন করি না। কারণ কোথা থেকে কখন কি বের হয়ে আসবে, আর কে মারা খেয়ে যাবে কেউ জানি না। তারপর সেই লেনদেন ধরে একে একে সবাইরে ট্যাগাইতে থাকবে। আর আমার সাথে ব্যাক্তিগত ভাবে অনেকের ঝামেলা আছে, যত চাই ঝামেলা কমাইতে, ঝামেলা খালি বাড়তে থাকে। এখন মডারেটর অব্দি আমার সাথে লেগে গেছে। যদিও আমি এটা পারসোনালি নেই নাই।
ভাই এতো ছোট ছোট এমাউন্টের জন্যও যে ব্লক করে দেয় এটা আমি জানতাম না। আমি বেশ কয়েকটা AML চেকার দিয়ে আমার এড্রেস চেক করাইছি, এন্ড বেশিরভাগ ক্ষেত্রেই, ৫-১০% এর নিচে কিছু questionable সোর্স থাকে (লাইক unlicensed, pools, mixers, casino ইত্যাদি)। আর বাকি ৮৫-৯০%, নো প্রোবলেম (licensed CEX ইত্যাদি)। এখন এই সামান্য পার্সেনটেজের জন্য, মিডিয়াম রিস্কের কাতারে বসায় দেয়। অবিয়াসলি, ১০০ জনের মধ্যে ৫-৭ জন দুষ্টু গরু থাকবে এটাই তো স্বাভাবিক।
CL, এন্ড BD, এর কথা শুনে একটু অবাক হলাম আমি। আমরা এমন না যে হাজার হাজার লাখ লাখ ডলার ট্রানজেকশনের ইউজার। যে সামান্য ৫০-১০০ ডলার পেমেন্ট ঢোকে তার উপরও রেসট্রিকশন খাওয়া ব্যাপারটা কেমন জানি দেখায় না? মিক্সার, ম্যানি লন্ডারিং এসব কথা যখন ইউজ করি তখন লাখ লাখ ডলারের কথা মাথায় ঘুরপাক খায়। কোথায় ৫-১০ টাকার কয়েন আর কোথায় ১০০০ টাকার কচকচা নোট। রেফারেন্স হয়তো বুঝছেন।
লেনদেনের বিষয়ে বল্লে আমি নিজেও এটা নিয়ে হেজিটেন্ট। তাই সকল প্রকার লেনদেন থেকে বাহিরে আমি, হোক সেটা টাকা পয়সা বা ফোরামেও কোনো কিছু। আর যদি করেও থাকি, তাহলে ভালোভাবে ডকুমেন্ট করে থ্রেড খুলে করি। নয়তো ১ বছর পর আইসা বলবে এটা তো তোমারই একাউন্ট, এই ধরো রেড ট্যাগ। আর ততদিনে আমার মনেও থাকবেনা, এই লেনদেন আসলে কার সাথে ঘটছিলো।
ঝামেলার বিষয়টা আমি দেখছি। জোর যার মুল্লুক তার টাইপ সিচুয়েশন পুরাই।
এটার সলিউশন আসলে আমিও প্রপারলি জানিনা এখন তো আমি ডিসেন্ট্রালাইজ ওয়ালেটে টাকা ডিপোজিট করি এবং সেখান থেকে সেন্ট্রালাইস ওয়ালেটে নেই। তারপর সেখান থেকে সেল দিয়ে থাকি।
তবে কে জানে কোন দিন আবার আমার এই একাউন্টও ফ্রিজ হয়ে যায়।
আমি এইখানে মেইন একটা সেন্ট্রালাইজ এক্সচেঞ্জার ব্যবহার করি সেটা হচ্ছে বাইনান্স আর বাকিগুলা হচ্ছে এমনি ইউজ করার জন্য যেখানে সিগনেচার পেমেন্ট পাঠাই, আর সকল এক্সপেরিমেন্টাল বিষয় যত আছে ওইসব cex অ্যাকাউন্ট দিয়ে করে থাকি। এতে করে মেইন যে একটা সেটার ঝুঁকি কমে যায়।
ভাই ক্রিপ্টো লাইব্রেরি ভাইয়ের মতো একই কৌশলে আমিও মারা খেয়েছি। আমিও ট্রানজেকশন ফি বাচাতে গিয়ে বাংলাদেশী টাকায় ২০k প্লাস মারা খাওয়া হয়ে গেছে। আমার এক্সচেঞ্জে সব হয় শুধু উইথড্র দিতে পারি না।
আপনাদের দুই জনের জন্য দুই বালতি সমবেদনা। এতো বড় মারা খাইলেন। আপনাদের দুই জনের অসিলায় আমরা বাকিরা কিছু শিখতে পারলাম। লোভে পাপ, পাপে টাকা ফ্রিজ।
হেই মিয়া আপনি কাউকে ব্লু ওয়ালেট নিয়ে পরামর্শ দিয়েছিলেন, এটা কি ইলেক্ট্রাম ওয়ালেটের মতোই নাকি,? ব্যবহার করেন নাকী কেউ?
ইউজ করতাম, আপাতত করতেছিনা। ডিফারেন্স যদি বলি ব্লু ওয়ালেট, কেক ওয়ালেট এগুলো মর্ডান কিসিমের। আর একেকটাই এক এক রকম ফিচারস, কোনোটাই LN সাপোর্ট করে, আবার কোনো টা প্রাইভেসি কেন্দ্রিক (Silent Payment) ইত্যাদি।
14. Post 67256364 (unedited backup) (by theymos) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 18:32:43 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
That's not true.
I looked into that post around when it was first reported, a few days ago. It
seems to me like he's mostly addressing the main topic, though it's a very difficult-to-understand post, especially without thoroughly reading the whole thread, so I'm not 100% sure. I left it unhandled to see if any other mods understood the full context enough to make a decision on it, but it remained unhandled, so I guess not. If no moderator has strong conviction that a post should be deleted or should not be deleted, such that the report remains unhandled, then our collective decision is that it's an edge case where's it's better to err on the side of leaving it.
Also, this isn't the case with that particular post, but speaking generally: seemingly-contradictory moderator decisions can sometimes be made if the reports are handled by multiple independent mods who didn't see what the other mod did or was looking at.
none of them mention the main account received ban.
Third-party services only know about bans which appear on the public moderation log, and not all bans appear there. Temporary bans are intentionally not publicly logged, and a small number of permanent bans also end up not being publicly logged due to the way they're created (often due to a temporary ban being made permanent).
15. Post 67256010 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 16:59:38 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
I did not provoke him anywhere or mention his name since I locked the reputation thread. But he has been attacking me everywhere and the moderators are not allowing me to answer him.
It is true, in that case where both yours and his posts were deleted (I reported them, but probably there were more who are also annoyed AF with that drama) he started it, but you joined in that offtopic. In the end, it doesn't really matter who started when you are both derailing the thread from its initial purpose.
Free Market Capitalist gave you a good advice: put him on ignore and forget about it. And he should do the same.
16. Post 67255872 (unedited backup) (by snipie) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 16:18:02 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Shishir99, I believe the misunderstanding between you and bitbollo got to an end...
Bitbollo didn't delete the negative feedback, but lost their DT-status from DT1 Strength (7) to DT1 Strength (-3) in 3 weeks:
Yes, I am aware about that part and this topic isn't the solution to solve it. It is up to DT members here to judge about the situation and take action accordingly. That negative trust was the origin of the chaos that happened and it is unfortunate to stay that long.
When I saw the locked topics, I thought everything is fine but I didn't pay attention about the possibility of his return to DT1. It is unfortunate that no one was able to fix it.
17. Post 67255439 (unedited backup) (by doggywin) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 14:20:19 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Some of the moderators' actions really convinced me to think that they care about who reported the posts. They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
That have always been the case.
Prestige Bias: A specific form of in-group bias where individuals favor those who hold high social standing or respect, often leading to preferential treatment in hiring, social interactions, and decision-making.
Affinity Bias: While broader, this often overlaps when the "respected members" share similar backgrounds or traits with the observer, leading to unconscious favoritism toward those who are socially validated.
18. Post 67255390 (unedited backup) (by TypoTonic) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 14:03:43 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
I don't think I misunderstood anyone.
-snip- Even a Global Mod admitted that he deleted one of my posts because he thinks it is an attack against bitbollo.
I think you misunderstood Mitchell. He only deleted your
post because it was off-topic and added nothing new to the discussion. Whether or not it was an attack against bitbollo was irrelevant in his decision, he was just pointing out that your assumption
(that oneadvocate is bitbollo's alt) was wrong.
This was an incorrect and thinly veiled attack on bitbollo, which was proven wrong, so ignoring that part, it added nothing (new) to the oneadvocate discussion (who was howard). That is why I removed it.
Maybe you're just overthinking things. A wise man once said
:
Take a break, come back with fresh mind and I am sure that will help.
19. Post 67255169 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 12:35:01 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Shishir99, I believe the misunderstanding between you and bitbollo got to an end...
This topic wouldn't help to prove anything against mods. You need to collect systematic trend favouring your opponent so the administrators could take an action which I believe it is not the case here.
Please lock the topic to avoid unnecessary escalation here. We had enough in the other board.
I don't think I misunderstood anyone.
I know this topic won't restore the deleted posts; I don't care about it either. But I am just showing you guys how fair they are. Even a Global Mod admitted that he deleted one of my posts because he thinks it is an attack against bitbollo. I am just curious if this is within the Mod's responsibility to defend someone personally and delete the posts. The moderation can't be fair if they remove posts because they think one user is attacking others. I can say the same thing. Do you think he would delete posts for me?
Even after locking the Reputation thread, bitbollo has been provoking me in other topics, posting off-topic, and the moderators are not handling the reports. They are deleting my posts, and I think they are not allowing me to post a reply against him.
Bitbollo didn't delete the negative feedback, but lost their DT-status from DT1 Strength (7) to DT1 Strength (-3) in 3 weeks:
He didn't delete it because he knows he will be on the DT network again after the DT reshuffle.
The good thing is, I can see one of his posts was removed after I created this topic. Do I really need to create a thread to get a fair judgment from the Mods?
20. Post 67254806 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Mon Oct 19 10:01:01 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Shishir99, I believe the misunderstanding between you and bitbollo got to an end...
Bitbollo didn't delete the negative feedback, but lost their DT-status from DT1 (Strength 7) to DT1 (Strength -3) in 3 weeks:
21. Post 67253854 (unedited backup) (by Sandra_hakeem) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 23:59:07 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
But please check the context and check who provoked whom. I did not provoke him anywhere or mention his name since I locked the reputation thread. But he has been attacking me everywhere and the moderators are not allowing me to answer him.
Moderators don't have the right to interfere in y'all personal vendetta, but at the same time, the whole drama has to end somehow. Shirshir could decide to end it by simply ignoring all notifications from the other guy and, it won't take long before everyone gets over it.
Op, I can tell you're hyper-vigilant and that's OK. Remember how you weren't getting the desired responses from the same user after you brought up an accusation which was later overturned? I assume you don't want to deal with any of that again. Just thinking out loud.
22. Post 67253349 (unedited backup) (by snipie) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 21:22:31 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Shishir99, I believe the misunderstanding between you and bitbollo got to an end...
This topic wouldn't help to prove anything against mods. You need to collect systematic trend favouring your opponent so the administrators could take an action which I believe it is not the case here.
23. Post 67253333 (unedited backup) (by Z_MBFM) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 21:17:19 CEST 2026) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
আপনার যে ব্রান্স এ একাউন্ট খোলা সেই ব্রাঞ্চে যাবেন সেখানে কথা বলবেন যে আপনি টাকা তুলবেন আপনাকে একটা এপ্লিকেশন ফর্ম দিবে সেই ফরম ফিলাপ করবেন আপনার চাহিদা জানাবেন যে আপনার কত টাকা প্রয়োজন। টাকার পরিমাণ কম হলে তখনই টাকা পেতে পারেন আর যদি টাকার পরিমাণ বেশি হয় তাহলে ২-৩ দিন সময় নিবে আপনার টাকা দিয়ে দিবে।
আরেকটা বিষয় হচ্ছে আপনি আপনার সেভিংস একাউন্ট এর টাকা তুলতে পারবেন কিন্তু যদি FDR থাকে তাহলে সেগুলো সম্ভবত এখন ভাঙতে পারবেন না খুব বেশি ইমারজেন্সি রিজন দেখাতে না পারলে। আপনি আপনার সেভিংস এর টাকা আর আপনার FDR এর লাভ সবগুলো তুলতে পারবেন একবারে একদিনেই। আমি আজকে আমার এক পরিচিত ভাই এর সাথে কথা বলছি সে NBL এর হেড অফিসে আছে। বললো যে ধীরে ধীরে সব স্বাভাবিক হবে পর্যাপ্ত টাকা নিয়ে ব্যাংক নামছে টাকা দিতে। তবে মানুষ প্যানিক আছে তাই শুরুতে একটু প্রবলেম থাকতে পারে। তবে বললো আশা করা যায় ২-৩ মাসের মধ্যে সব একবারে স্বাভাবিক হবে।
ভাই শুনলাম ১ লক্ষ্য টাকার বেশি উঠালে আবেদন জমাদিতে হবে এবং ২-১ দিন পর টাকা উঠানো যাবে। কিন্তু এক লাখ টাকার নিচে হলে আবেদন করার প্রয়োজন হয় না।
আর আমার মনে হয় না যে FDR ভাঙতে দিবে, কারণ বহু মানুষ এই ব্যাংকের উপর খেপে আছে, সুযোগ পাইলেই সব উঠাইয়া ফালাইবে। সঞ্চয়ের টাকা গুলো উঠানো যায় আরকী, কিন্তু প্রচুর ভিড়।
ব্যাংক আসলে মানুষের চাহিদা বুইঝা ব্রাঞ্চে টাকা আনতেছে। ছোট অ্যামাউন্ট হলে সেগুলো টেকেল দিতে পারবে কিন্তু বড় এমাউন্ট করলে অবশ্যই আগে থেকে এপ্লিকেশন নিয়ে তারপরে সেই ব্রাঞ্চের সেই পরিমাণে টাকা আনতে হবে। ব্যাংকের অথরিটি যথেষ্ট প্রেসার এর মধ্যে আছে একবার মানুষ প্যানিক হইয়া সব টাকা তুইলা খেলতে শুরু করছিল তারপরে তারা টোটালি টাকা দিতে পারে নাই। সরকার থেকে বাংলাদেশ ব্যাংক থেকে এখন আবার সাপোর্ট পাইছে আর এই সময় যদি তারা ঠিকভাবে ম্যানেজমেন্ট করতে না পারে তাইলে এরপরে তারা মনে হয় না বাংলাদেশ ব্যাংক থেকে কোন ধরনের সহযোগিতা পাবে। পদ্মা ব্যাংক পুরোপুরি শেষ এখন এই ব্যাংক দেওলিয়া ঘোষণা করবে অলরেডি এই সিদ্ধান্ত নিতেছে আর সেই ব্যাংকে যারা টাকা রাখছিল তারা বিমা আইন অনুযায়ী সর্বোচ্চ ২ লাখ টাকা করে পাবে আমানতকারীরা। এই হচ্ছে বাংলাদেশের ব্যাংকিং সেক্টরের অবস্থা। তার বিষয়টা হইতেছে বাংলাদেশের মানুষ তাড়াতাড়ি প্যানিক হয়ে। একসাথে টাকা তুলতে শুরু করলে যত শক্তিশালী ব্যাংক হোক না কেন সেই ব্যাংকও দেউলিয়া হয়ে যাবে।
এনিওয়ে আমি কয়েকটা ফ্রি চেকার (black & Bitcoin AML bot) দিয়ে আমার এড্রেস চেক দিছিলাম কয়েকবার। রেজাল্ট আছে মিডিয়াম রিস্ক, যেখানে বেশিরভাগ বিটিসি ঢুকছে সিগ্নেচার পেমেন্ট থেকে, এন্ড কিছু ফোরাম মেম্বারদের থেকে। এটা নিয়ে কি চিন্তা করবো?
আসলে আমরা আলসেমি করে একই এড্রেস বার বার ব্যাবহার করি। আর ক্যাম্পেইন পেমেন্ট রিসিভ করার জন্য তো আর প্রতি সপ্তাহে চেঞ্জ করা সম্ভব না।
আপনি যদি একই এড্রেস এ একাধিকবার বিভিন্ন সোর্স থেকে পেমেন্ট রিসিভ করেন, তাহলে এগুলা এমনিতেই মিডিয়াম রিস্ক দেখায়। ফোরামে অনেক মেম্বার আছে যারা প্রতিবার এপ্লিকেশন বা কোথাও পারটিসিপেট করলে নতুন নতুন এড্রেস দিয়ে এপ্লাই করে। সবচাইতে ভালো হবে ভালো জানাশোনা কোন ইনস্ট্যান্ট এক্সচেঞ্জ থেকে সোয়াপ করে নিয়ে তারপর সেন্ট্রালাইজড এক্সচেঞ্জ এ ফান্ড মুভ করা। আর সেন্ট্রালাইজড এক্সচেঞ্জ অভয়েড করতে চাইলে বাইরের লোকাল এক্সচেঞ্জারে সেল করা, যদিও লোকাল গুলূতে ডলার রেট অনেক খারাপ। তবে লোকাল সাইট আছে, যেখানে আপনি চাইলে সেল করতে পারবেন। আবার স্ক্যাম ও হয়ে যায় মাঝে মাঝে।
আমিও তো ভাই এক এড্রেস বারবার ব্যবহার করি। এড্রেস পরিবর্তন করা ঝামেলা লাগে তয় এখন পর্যন্ত কোন ঝামেলার সম্মুখীন হই নাই। তবে সিগনেচার ক্যাম্পেইনের পেমেন্টগুলা যেহেতু ক্যাসিনো ফান্ড থেকে আসছে বেশিরভাগ সময় তাই এই ফান্ড নিয়ে ঝুঁকিতেই থাকতে হয় কোন সময় সেন্ট্রালাইজ এক্সচেঞ্জ এ ডিপোজিট করলে অ্যাকাউন্ট ফ্রিজও করতে পারে। বিশেষ কইরা যারা মিক্সচার এর ফান্ড এক্সচেঞ্জ এ ডিপোজিট করে তারা সবচাইতে বেশি ঝুঁকিতে থাকে। CL এর অ্যাকাউন্ট ফ্রিজ করছিল শুনছিলাম মিক্সার এর বিটকয়েনের ডিপোজিট করার কারণে।
24. Post 67253109 (unedited backup) (by DYING_S0UL) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 19:58:37 CEST 2026) in বাংলাদেশ (Bangladesh):
এনিওয়ে আমি কয়েকটা ফ্রি চেকার (black & Bitcoin AML bot) দিয়ে আমার এড্রেস চেক দিছিলাম কয়েকবার। রেজাল্ট আছে মিডিয়াম রিস্ক, যেখানে বেশিরভাগ বিটিসি ঢুকছে সিগ্নেচার পেমেন্ট থেকে, এন্ড কিছু ফোরাম মেম্বারদের থেকে। এটা নিয়ে কি চিন্তা করবো?
আসলে আমরা আলসেমি করে একই এড্রেস বার বার ব্যাবহার করি। আর ক্যাম্পেইন পেমেন্ট রিসিভ করার জন্য তো আর প্রতি সপ্তাহে চেঞ্জ করা সম্ভব না।
আপনি যদি একই এড্রেস এ একাধিকবার বিভিন্ন সোর্স থেকে পেমেন্ট রিসিভ করেন, তাহলে এগুলা এমনিতেই মিডিয়াম রিস্ক দেখায়। ফোরামে অনেক মেম্বার আছে যারা প্রতিবার এপ্লিকেশন বা কোথাও পারটিসিপেট করলে নতুন নতুন এড্রেস দিয়ে এপ্লাই করে। সবচাইতে ভালো হবে ভালো জানাশোনা কোন ইনস্ট্যান্ট এক্সচেঞ্জ থেকে সোয়াপ করে নিয়ে তারপর সেন্ট্রালাইজড এক্সচেঞ্জ এ ফান্ড মুভ করা। আর সেন্ট্রালাইজড এক্সচেঞ্জ অভয়েড করতে চাইলে বাইরের লোকাল এক্সচেঞ্জারে সেল করা, যদিও লোকাল গুলূতে ডলার রেট অনেক খারাপ। তবে লোকাল সাইট আছে, যেখানে আপনি চাইলে সেল করতে পারবেন। আবার স্ক্যাম ও হয়ে যায় মাঝে মাঝে।
আমার কাছে একাধিক এড্রেস হ্যান্ডেল করা প্যারা লাগে ভাই। আমি জন্মের পর থেকে সেই সেইম এড্রেসই ব্যবহার করে আসতেছি। বিষয়টা একটু সারকাস্টিক টোনে বল্লাম বাট এটাই রিয়েলিটি। ইভেন আমি সেকেন্ড এড্রেসও ইউজ করিনা। অনেকে হয়তো এড্রেস A - এড্রেস B - তারপর সেন্ট্রালাইজ এক্সচেঞ্জে পার করে। বাট আমি অলওয়েজ প্রাইমারি এড্রেস টু এক্সচেঞ্জে পার করি। যত তত পেমেন্ট আছে সবই ঐ সেইম জায়গাতেই জমা হয়। বারবার সেইম এড্রেস ব্যবহার করলে প্রাইভেসির হোগামারা হয়ে যায়, জানি, বাট তারপরও করি। আমি আসলে অলস কিসিমের মানুষ। আবার নতুন এড্রেস, নতুন সিডফ্রেস, নতুন ব্যাকআপ, কি এক জ্বালা।
হ্যাঁ একটা ভয় আছে যে ঠাস করে একাউন্ট ফ্রিজ করে দেয় কিনা, যেমনটা ক্রিপ্টো লাইব্রেরী ভাইয়ের সাথে ঘটছিলো, এজন্য হয়তো বেশি এমাউন্ট ডিপোজিটও করিনা বা রাখিও না। এমনকি পিটুপি মাধ্যমে যখন ডলার সেল দেই সেখানেও ছোট এমাউন্টে দেই, ভেঙে ভেঙে দেই, যাতে বিকাশ ওয়ালারা আবার ঝামেলা না করে।
আমি ভালো রেটের জন্য কুকয়েন থেকে বাইনান্সে গেলাম আর আপনি কন বাহিরের এক্সচেন্জার ইউজ করতে। লল। থাক, দেখি কবে মারা খাই। খাইলে সবাইরে জানাবো নি।
25. Post 67252619 (unedited backup) (by hugeblack) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 17:12:31 CEST 2026) in [Warning] Stealthex.top is scam website. A clone of stealthex.io:
So yes, the website is already down. Whoever reported it did a very good job. Or maybe the scam website owner has decided to close the website, seeing it was exposed already. Good catch logfiles.
It might be a policy adopted by the website owner to avoid having the service reported; they simply wait quietly until users forget about it, at which point they reactivate it.
flag has been supported.
26. Post 67252333 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 15:25:31 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Yes, I am not saying this. It's because I think it was fair since both parties' replies were deleted, and I agree that it was kind of off-topic. But please check the context and check who provoked whom. I did not provoke him anywhere or mention his name since I locked the reputation thread. But he has been attacking me everywhere and the moderators are not allowing me to answer him.
Lol. That happens to you because you haven't done this.
27. Post 67252301 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 15:12:02 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
You were very kind to send a message while you deleted my responses. Since you already posted your part, I would also love to share the message I sent to you, so the community can check and let me know if I am overreacting.
I appreciate your response.
However, I am more curious why you are deleting my posts and not bitbollo who is constantly posting off-topic.
You are not allowing me to answer him. He provokes me first, and then I reply to him.
My posts are being deleted, while his posts are there. Is it because he is a heavyweight forum member?
Apologies if there was a misunderstanding. Since you handled the reputation board reply, I thought you handled the scam accusation board replies as well. I see you removed two posts - not ONE.
I do not have any complaints about the last one, which was about being off-topic, and I admitted this in my post myself. Sometimes Topic A brings Topic B. I really think the moderators care more about the heavyweight forum members. You should read the context before you delete a post. I did not posted that out of nowhere. But, I would let it go because I also think it is kind of off-topic.
As for the other post
As FinneysTrueVision pointed out already, he got banned.
However, I am now curious if the ban should be extended to his other accounts if it is exposed somehow. It is pretty clear that the account owner is not someone new. He knows a lot of things about the forum members. I strongly suspect it is an alt account of bollo, who has been attacking the people who have excluded him or removed him from their trust list. The first post of this account was in bollo's reputation thread and supported him, while this account attacked the people who did not support Bollo. Even though I locked the reputation thread already, Bollo quoted me and mentioned me in other threads and tried to provoke me to speak again. I view this as an attack. But I hope he won't use AI with his main account.
Even if I am wrong with my assumption, this was not Off-topic since we are talking about the user oneadvocate, he used AI, and I am the one who reported his posts. These AI posts are still there, which was not handled. So, I don't get why you would delete this post.
As for the scam accusation board replies, if it's not you, then another Moderator deleted my post but kept bitbollo's posts, which I clearly mentioned in that post.
I am going to create a thread in META soon.
Thanks for your responses.
Since when have the moderators injected themselves into personal things between the forum members?
Since when are the moderators allowed to delete posts because someone is incorrect?
Even if I am incorrect, does your power really allow you to remove the posts?
As for the attack, I said I suspect, not confirmed. How do you think it is an attack?
Even if it is an attack, does your Mod responsibility force you to protect someone from attack? If so, would you protect me from his attacks? He has posted dozens of nonsense so far. Would you be kind enough to check the posts I said are off-topic?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.msg67248195#msg67248195https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.msg67249525#msg67249525I was attacked in these two posts. These are off-topic too.
The moderators deleted my responses to these posts. But bitbollo's posts are there. Would you protect me from his attack?
28. Post 67252291 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 15:09:50 CEST 2026) in How fair BitcoinTalk moderators are? :
Some of the moderators' actions really convinced me to think that they care about who reported the posts. They don't care if the report is from an average forum member.
Leaving aside what Mitchell has said, O think they are just humans, and they won't act so quickly if the report is made by a newbie instead of a Legendary member. But at your level, I don't think they are looking at trust feedback or anything to handle reports.
Probably a mistake or not checking the context, as you say. What you are not saying here is that both your reply and bitbollo's one were deleted
from this thread. In his case two replies were deleted.
29. Post 67251680 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 10:33:43 CEST 2026) in User snuffman8 spread false/fake information on technical board:
I am just curious to know: was it his intention to spread the false information? Or is there a possibility that he does not know how these things actually work, and he probably does not know enough? Personally, I sometimes think that I know a lot of things about Bitcoin. But when it comes to technical things, I might be wrong in some cases, and I might write something wrong without knowing that I am actually wrong. In such cases, I would expect someone who knows better than me to correct me. Isn't that how a community is supposed to work?
I'm not sure you missed this part of my post or you disagree with it.
--snip--
Honestly, what else can I do to show my regret OP. 😁 Give me a chance
pick one,
1. wait for 1 year passed since the tag created and re-ask me to consider.
2. give proof for at least 2 out of 4 of your statement (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg66154246#msg66154246) is factually correct/accurate enough. by proof, it could be source code, BIP, or other credible source.
30. Post 67251639 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sun Oct 18 10:10:08 CEST 2026) in AI Spam Report Reference Thread:
Sorry, this might be a little off-topic here
~
A heavyweight forum member posted some off-topic things
~
Then I posted a reply, which was deleted by the moderators - probably because of off-topic
~
which is also off-topic
~
I am sorry for being a little off-topic here
Don't you see the irony of posting off-topic to complain about off-topic posts? If you want to complain moderation, you should do so in
Meta.
31. Post 67249647 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Sat Oct 17 17:02:38 CEST 2026) in Mixers to be banned:
The mixer signature is visible on
AdolfinWolf's account
@Theymos
I was reading the feedback on LoyceV's profile, and noticed he once helped a member get his Bitcoin back by sweeping the address; that guy exposed his private keys in the forum. I was reading that thread and noticed that the forum account of
Chipmixer was actually using their signature. So I came here to see if anyone reported this before and found this post. Since the domain is no longer a mixer, I don't think theymos would wipe out the signatures on these accounts. But I am sure some members would often notice this and come here to report it. LOL.
If such accounts are already being cleaned,
betkarma also has a link to an active mixer in its website link and signature.
They should not be drastically blamed for this, because the service has both an exchange and casino function on the site (in addition to mixer possibilities), and they themselves said that they planned to announce exchange services here, but later gave up because of the mixer ban rules.
32. Post 67249525 (unedited backup) (by bitbollo) (scraped on Sat Oct 17 16:15:37 CEST 2026) in biggerz scam casino. closed account without any reason to steal winnings 6.75btc:
losing DT voting
This means I need to be harassed if I get scammed by little mouse and his "partners"?
This means I have no freedom of speech and talk about dozens of similar scams?
Who cares about this "power" at this point?
Anyone can verify what I have posted - open the reference and the proofs posted.
Meanwhile except a long list of insults you have provided only the proof to be completely untrustworthy.
None of my accusation has been proved not true and you have trolled me 200 times with a retard accusation old 10 years.
At this point you have missed the clue that you had to refrain to insults me so heavily and call these accusations as barely true.
The over reaction for having exposed all these scammers is just the latest confirmation that was needed about this scam farms.
As you may seen I would continue to posts about these scams and these users involved all the time that would be needed.
33. Post 67248652 (unedited backup) (by aleks86) (scraped on Sat Oct 17 09:53:07 CEST 2026) in biggerz scam casino. closed account without any reason to steal winnings 6.75btc:
Since you mentioned Lizex, I want to point out that Ab de Royse777 himself left negative feedback on Lizex's profile and supported the flag himself.
We must say thank you because they are "in contact with scammers?" Also your friend
Little Mouse was seeking for "better contest idea" for a site "knowing as managed by the same scammer"
Luckyanon aka Frogbet
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.msg67225261#msg67225261I appreciate their effort because, these "campaign managers" are bringing well known scammer sites in bitcointalk - despite the evidence they just don't care to verify nothing.
It's not easy spend all this time to harass users, and wasting time continuing to promote and defend a scam every month.
It's evident that you are able to defend only people that send you few coins sometimes with these ridicolous theft.
This scam accusation about LIZEX was created on 19th Septemeber and despite all evidences it has been added this red trust only on 05 October 2026 - without supporting flag and leaving the site able to continue to scam!
Did you have missed that first there was others scam accusations on forum not evaluated of a few months ago? Right?
Come on, you invented shit with 13 years old address in my possess, you can verify other complaints posted here about Lizex.
They take care of "the community" once they need to get pay by the sponsor.
It's a evidence that there are the same "campaign manager" in most all of SCAM ACCUSATIONS TOPIC!
...
September 19, 2026, 12:19:28 PM
...
...
5 October 2026
...
How many times we are seeing the same shows - did you really think that since there are a bunch of coackroaches promoting scam now the whole forum must change name to "SCAMTALK"?
This topic by OP was opened on 08 Septemeber meanwhile the scam "campaign manager" has decided to promote here and AFTER decide to take care of this complaint.
...
13th Ocotber 2026
...
Have you see the strategy "he is not surprised this time"? The same scheme or "lets find your error" with OP.
They have verified ALL of your post in bitcointalk and trustpilot just to move the accusation on HIM and stop to look for the real issue.
They are saying this very clear. They don't care to find evidence and avoid people get scammed.
They are wasting energy and resources only for defend the scammer. Same scheme for promoting, harassing users - defend scammers.
I would be worried for "the real" consequences of these shitty actions/scam promotion. It's not anymore a game for a keyboard warrior.
edit
Just to mention about data and statistics - for people that are not mini0ns paid by these scams.
Think about your playing style - read slowly "the consistent method" and be honest - would this work as proof for a scam?
Did we can define this a "pattern" after has been dismissed also by a third party?
here there is another confirmation they are absolutely untrustable to help bitcointalk community:
They are trying to use a profit obtained by OP of 131,4% - since he plays with an highstake.
Meanwhile he has won "Only" 101,7% with low stake.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.msg67247091#msg67247091If he has won more with high stakes why should be not pay? It is the proof to have a scam?
"• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game."
Consistent method:
You repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €x, €y or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.
- if you have a profit higher once you play bigger you would confirmed as scammer.
- if you change your stake you will be a scammer
- if you deposit after losing and then you win you will be a scammer.
That is the whole point of what they are saying. He writes a long, empty text, framing the fact that I made a deposit after a loss as some sort of serious act of malice. And if I happened to win after a deposit—well, that’s also presented as a fact and, supposedly, an act of malice. And then, as yet another act of malice, I actually wanted to withdraw that amount.
This is nice proof that Biggerz is absolute scam.
This man think if he generated full wall of text, which do not have any sense, but the weight will be significant, and people might get the impression that he is actually saying something meaningful. But the reality is simply that the player played a slot machine and wanted to withdraw their winnings.
34. Post 67248234 (unedited backup) (by bitbollo) (scraped on Sat Oct 17 03:38:56 CEST 2026) in A Probable Account Farm From the Italian Board:
...
These two posts are off-topic, and we've already exhausted this discussion in two other threads. Please stop derailing this one.
Wait a moment.
He has started again to spread fake and totally not real non sense mentioning me first in the off topic.
I am not talking about him
I would not get called scammer and moron by this disturbed user that harassed me for few weeks.
He has posted invented accusation and he has no any right to calling me SCAMMER and MORON.
He has just FABRICATED AND COMPLETELY FAKE ACCUSATION - using keys in my possess since 13 years and used also with KYC CEX.
The blockchain transactions cannot be fabricated. The Bitlist archive and Loyce archives are not fabricated either. You are just a scammer who came up with a new mask and claims to be an Angel. I don't want to unlock that thread again, you moron.
There are no transactions linked about my person and any fraud committed he has no sense to repeat this LIE big like an house and crazy offensive to an user that has being here for 13 years.
At this point you're accusing of a REAL CRIME in REAL LIFE, since I am already well known by many users with my name and surname - I would ask you to refrain or if you are really sure there are transactions linked to any CRIME you had to go to INTERPOL otherwise you to stop immediately to spread this lies in public clear defamatory
35. Post 67248195 (unedited backup) (by bitbollo) (scraped on Sat Oct 17 02:34:01 CEST 2026) in biggerz scam casino. closed account without any reason to steal winnings 6.75btc:
We must say thank you because they are "in contact with scammers?" Also your friend little mouse was seeking for "better contest idea" for a site "knowing as managed by the same scammer"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.msg67225261#msg67225261 I appreciate their effort because, these "campaign managers" are bringing well known scammer sites in bitcointalk - despite the evidence they just don't care to verify nothing.
It's not easy spend all this time to harass users, and wasting time continuing to promote and defend a scam every month.
Since you mentioned Lizex, I want to point out that Ab de Royse777 himself left negative feedback on Lizex's profile and supported the flag himself.
It's evident that you are able to defend only people that send you few coins sometimes with these ridicolous theft. What about these users?
Did you have missed that first there was others scam accusations on forum not evaluated of a few months ago? Right?
Come on, you invented shit with 13 years old address in my possess, you can verify other complaints posted here in Lizex.
Also this scam accusation was created on 19th Septemeber and despite all evidences it has been added this red trust only on 05 October 2026 - without supporting flag and leaving the site able to continue to scam!
...
September 19, 2026, 12:19:28 PM
...
...
5 October 2026
...
How many times we are seeing the same shows - did you really think that since there are a bunch of coackroaches promoting scam now the whole forum must change name to "SCAMTALK"?
This topic by OP was opened on 08 Septemeber meanwhile the scam "campaign manager" has decided to promote here and AFTER decide to take care of this complaint.
Have you see the strategy "he is not surprised this time"? The same scheme or "lets find your error".
I would be worried for "the real" consequences of these shitty actions/scam promotion. It's not anymore a game for a keyboard warrior.
36. Post 67246979 (unedited backup) (by acroman08) (scraped on Fri Oct 16 19:38:55 CEST 2026) in [WARNING / SCAM ALERT] theoriginals.io locked my account with large funds inside:
I have attached screenshots of the restriction prompt and proof of my attempts to contact support. Until this issue is resolved, I strongly advise everyone in the crypto community to STAY AWAY from this platform.
I think you forgot to include the screenshot that you supposedly have to support your claims against theoriginals.io.
Also, it looks like Shishir99 already mentioned your case on their ANN thread. Their representative seems to be active(they posted multiple times on Oct 15th), so they might respond here soon.
37. Post 67246696 (unedited backup) (by DireWolfM14) (scraped on Fri Oct 16 18:04:38 CEST 2026) in A Probable Account Farm From the Italian Board:
~
~
These two posts are off-topic, and we've already exhausted this discussion in two other threads. Please stop derailing this one.
