We’re currently updating our KYC/AML page to include a dedicated section where this will be explained clearly in detail — specifically outlining that KYC requirements apply to fiat users, while crypto users can operate without mandatory verification unless triggered by risk factors.

This should remove any confusion and make everything fully transparent going forward.

-----------------


The reason for this is that certain mini games (like dice) can be used with very low-risk strategies to cycle large volume and meet requirements with minimal loss, which can be used to exploit bonuses or promotions.

For example, some players repeatedly bet at very low multipliers (like 1.01), where losses are rare, allowing them to farm wagering, VIP points, or promotions while avoiding real risk.

That said, we’re actively working on improving this and adding more games to the allowed group, including mini games, to keep a better balance between fairness and user experience.

---------------------


Thanks for your kind words , we are preparing exclusive bonus for bitcointalk


----------------


Just to clarify, we’re not saying that playing original/mini games is fraudulent by itself. The issue comes from how certain players use them — for example, repeatedly depositing, playing very low-risk strategies (like 1.01 bets), cycling volume, and withdrawing with minimal exposure. When this is done systematically, it can be used to bypass wagering logic, farm VIP systems, or in some cases raise AML concerns.

That’s the main reason behind the current setup — it’s more about preventing this type of behavior than limiting normal gameplay.

That said, we’re already reviewing this and working on adjustments, including allowing more contribution from these games, so the system feels more balanced for regular players.

--------------


Thanks for suggestion , we will take it in consideration


------------------



Yes, we’re currently preparing a special bonus specifically for Bitcointalk users so they can test the platform properly.

We’ve seen some concerns here, and honestly, we want to change that perception. Casinok is very focused on rewarding active players we regularly provide different types of bonuses such as no-wager free cash, free spins, and other promos, through multiple channels.

The goal is to give users a fair chance to try the platform and see how it performs over time.

They are already working on updating their ToS with more details and you can see their working plan with the reply.

Casinos can have similar theme colors as there are many casinos and it's not too strange if they have similar favorite color themes for their websites.

Nothing like that is available at the promotion page https://casinok.com/promotions

But CasinOK has some contests for Bitcointalk community and there is still time for you to join these contests.
CasinOK Bounty Hunter Poker | $400 Guaranteed + $Huge KO Bounties| 3rd May
Casinok Multi-bet/Parlay Challenge | $100 Prize pool | 4 Places Paid | 30/04
Casinok Predict the Minute of 1st Goal | $100 Prize pool | 4 Winners | 30/04

Any time you park your crypto on a custodial betting site to earn a few extra percent in yield, you are taking on a massive risk and effectively giving them an unsecured loan and casino tokens should be viewed as digital arcade tickets they really are fine to hold temporarily to get a lower house edge, cashback, or some free spins, but treating an unregulated casino's native utility token as a long term investment is a recipe for getting rekt

I've exhausted my last attempt [I think it is safe to say that after three knocks, if a door stays shut, it's because the door doesn't want to be opened] just now, and all I can do is wait and see if the last knock opened the door. I'll try with the other contact I have, if this one reach a dead-end, but I do think it's useless to try to reach that contact as they'll generally powerless to make any call.

Yes, the main beneficiary of the casino token is the casino itself, as they have free tokens with them and they need to create its value, and the more valuable the token is, the more profitable the casino can benefit from that token.

There are two schemes that most of the token creators use to provide value to the token, the first is staking, and the other is the buy-back scheme. Freebitco was involved in providing staking of Fun token and that was the only platform where gamblers could keep their FUN token and earn rewards. Sadly, Freebitco was first to stop the withdrawal of FUN tokens and a lot of investors were left empty handed as they couldn't withdraw.

Hello,

Thank you for your interest.

The issue we are currently facing is related to Trustpilot’s strict policies regarding how businesses invite users to leave reviews. Trustpilot requires that all review invitations are sent directly through their platform to ensure compliance with their guidelines.

We had been in discussions with them and had already started the integration process. However, during this period, we independently sent an email to our users inviting them to rate their experience with the casino. Unfortunately, this approach did not align with their policies, and as a result, a warning notice was placed on our profile.

Since then, we have been working to address the situation and ensure full compliance with their requirements moving forward.

Please let us know if you need any additional details.


--------------------------



We are a Hybrid brand , as you can see there are fiat payment options too, that's why there is a verification requirement, but i can assure you it's fully no KYC on crypto as mentioned. This rule about verification is only for visa/Mastercard users .


-------------------------


We’re here and actively working on everything. There’s a lot more coming in terms of campaigns and updates, and we’ll keep things moving on our side.

All threads will be answered and handled accordingly.

-------------------------



We are here from now on and everything will be alright , just got everything up and now we will work with you guys to make CasinOK better place for users


-----------------------------------

We understand your concern. We’ve only recently set everything up on the forum, so it took us a bit of time to get fully organized here.

That said, we’re now actively monitoring and from this point on all questions and threads will be answered.


----------------------------------




We understand your point, and just to clarify — this rule is not there to limit regular players, but to prevent fraudulent activity.

We’ve seen cases where certain games (like dice or similar low-risk/high-frequency games) are used to bypass requirements or gain unfair advantage. Because of that, some restrictions are applied specifically to protect the system and keep things fair for everyone.

That said, we’re always reviewing these rules and trying to keep the balance between security and a good player experience.

Good catch.

I made a test. I created an account without my phone number, didn't even verify my e-mail, and tried to make a deposit:

I was able to generate a bitcoin address to deposit:



So it is clearly possible to make a deposit without any KYC.

ToS are wrong. They are outdated, or just copied from somewhere else. They need to reflect the real casino terms of use and procedures.

By the way, it’s strange that there is still a registration form for new users, considering that it’s been several months since they announced their plans to shut down the site. What’s more, it’s amusing that the counters on the Freebitcoin homepage, showing the total number of registered users and the total number of games played, are still active. To be honest, I don’t believe these counters are displaying accurate information at this point.

Not "some people" but nobody is able to withdraw BTC or FUN tokens back. It is one company.
I strongly advise to file a legal complaint: (https://ois.fincen.gov/contact/) – you can verify the site via Google.
You will receive a reply within a few day or weeks. It is the best and only way how to get your money back.

To be completely fair to them, if we look back at the landscape when this transition happened you have to give credit where credit is due and it was a brilliant business idea at the time and it worked flawlessly for years
Even if the chart looks grim today or the tokenomics feel heavy handed now, the initial integration of FUN was a masterstroke

Is this just for popularity? because some casinos do not apply KYC in the thread title but in the ToS/AML they say to ask for KYC at any time this is often only for the needs of license regulation in the proof that casinos do not ask for KYC as long as there are no suspected cases.
Casinok needs clarification whether KYC in this casino is mandatory or not? Or this rule can only be relaxed?

There can be many theories on what actually happen between Fun token and those who were behind Freebitcoin. What I think it makes more sense is imagining Fun started as a very small project which actually caught the attention of millions within both the world of gambling and also alt-coin investing, Freebitcoin realized how much potential and attention this project had, so they associated with them secretly and got stakes on the developing team and the direction of the project.

As part of this deal (which the general public had no idea about), Freebitcoin has bestowed with a very substantial amount of Fun tokens, so they could be distributed and integrated within the system of the casino. All this story does not have any sense if Freebitcoin did not have any involvement within the development and direction of Fun, because a casino as big as FB would not pay attention to a token if they did not have something to get out of them, they were a business after all, before they turned into the scam we all witness today unfolding before our very own eyes.

It's getting a bit old. Pharmacists weren't skeptical back in 2018. That's where it all started : https://archive.is/g0Gid#selection-7990.2-8045.194, but the photo had been forgotten.
In 2021, I needed that photo for a quizz, and an orange AI came to my rescue. And since that photo pops up from time to time.

That's the problem: I don't. I hit a wall upon contacting one from two that I get. They left me on read through two nudges I gave them. I'll try once again to send another nudge on Monday before considering that bridge as burned and move to the other, less steady, bridge.

Uhh, OP, Proller, post above will serve as my reply to your DM too, about the inactivities.

Now this has become a classical marketing method for every casino. They always present themselves as NO KYC casino, only to end up as a KYC casino later on.
Shishir, I don't think there is much to clarify. Everything is as clear as the blue sky.

Some casinos still say they have to put certain terms inside their T&C because of licensing and will only ask for KYC under certain unavoidable circumstances.
But for casinok, they will straight out ask you to do KYC.


When you say MUST, there is nothing else that needs saying. 

Most online casinos on this forum that advertise themselves as not having KYC simply mean that they don't require KYC from the get go or by default but they reserve the right to request from players to undergo identity verification at any point in time. However, the thing you found is significantly different and isn't the same thing as 'we don't request KYC by default'. Those terms state that you can't even play, deposit or withdraw without undergoing KYC first. Very contradicting indeed!

This is technical question which we can't just say yes or no but it would come from the two side. Since they were not the original owners of the token, they manipulated the market price to have gain.
Based on discussions on the thread when the hi started. I was thinking that the FUN Token was theirs but coming to know this is a surprise to me too but it is possible. And it is business probably they stroke a deal with the token company to market it in their casino site and have their share.

so i looked around a bit, and this is the oldest post with the picture i could find.


what really confuses me is whether these people were photographed with this forum open on their computers, or if they were busy with something else. it looks like this forum is open on the screen in front of the woman with the yellow scarf.

if that’s the case, it must be a photo with a really interesting story behind it, because i don’t think anyone would let themselves be photographed while browsing the forum. especially such a strange photo 

Thats a red flag if I have ever seen one.
Promote "No KYC" while KYC is MANDATORY for ALL users according to their terms.

Not a good look.

I think Bitz is doing something that most casino can not. They have combined great promotion with a comfortable user experience. I have always been satisfied with the ease of use of their platform. Especially the instant deposit and withdrawal system with crypto is great and the interface is also very clean. Here Bitz is ahead of all the other laggy or messy sites in the market

Okay, no casino is a clean slate. But the way Bitz listen to the forum user and rubs itself in show that they are not just here for a quick thrill. Rather they want to be a long distance racehorse. In such a competitive market action is worth more than word. And Bitz is clearly taking the lead in that direction

Bitcointalk Account name: Shishir99
Reson why you are eligible to joine here: I am not sure how much practical it will be. But I do not like the way some people treat others. This forum is full of people with double standards, and I would be happy to speak out against them, knowing I have someone to back me. There are people who run after others just to get some merits or to satisfy their ego. I have been speaking against them for a while, and now I would like to represent the alliance.

As for the rules, yes, I do think you need to write some rules. Not everyone should be able to be part of the alliance. If someone is found guilty, the Alliance members should be the first to tag them.

Exactly, the competition is too high. Players no longer stay loyal to a single casino. They look for better alternatives every day. If a player does not get good treatment from one casino, they won't think twice to move to another casino. So, the casino has to be legit with its offers, generous when it comes to giveaways and bonuses. The players no longer care about the regular promotions with their huge rollover requirements.

As for bitz, I think they are on the right path. I will appreciate a casino any day if they keep their promises. If a casino does regular giveaways and allows people to withdraw without making a deposit, I can that they are here to stay in the market.

The competition in the industry is very tough so they have to raise their standards high, gain trust and build better reputation to be among the best or the best if possible i guess that's why they're giving those offers Shishir99 mentioned so people would see more reasons why they should patronize their services.
 If you think about it, they're doing great cause you can't compete well in an industry where the competition is very tough by doing regular thngs, customers would always look out for the best or patronise platforms that offer something fair enough so I think they should keep up with the "contest, giveaways and good services they offer".

I think I know what casino you might be referring, as there are a lot of gamblers who really complained about it. And they started with a huge Free Spin for the community but you can't simply withdraw it because you have to meet the wagering requirements.


Yes, we understand that it is all about the promotion. But sometimes they might be really putting up huge wagering requirements that is impossible to meet for some average joe gamblers like the rest of us.

Casino platforms give bonuses to users, this is just a promotion because if they give high wagering requirements, then the maximum gamblers will not be able to meet them and therefore the platforms do not have to give that money to the users. The amount they show on their platform is just a number text. However, some platforms really give very attractive bonuses and they give very small wagering requirements which can be easily met. However, you cannot expect the same bonuses from all platforms because each platform operates according to their own business model.

I feel another unfair behavior from a casino is offering giveaway and setting the wagering requirement very high to meet. Bonuses from giveaway are supposed to be set easy for withdrawal, a maximum of X2 wagering for possible withdrawal, anything more may seem.

I understand too, why casinos make wagering a must for bonus giveaway, multiplier wagering contest doesn't drag the same participation compared to when it is a free one, totally fine with wagering but it should be paid after meeting requirements.

There are many ways for fake casinos to appear live and display logs of numerous bets per second. I think they're more skilled at this than real casinos.

Running a real casino is more complicated than one might think, not just marketing, but also technical aspects (responsiveness, reliability of gaming machines), liquidity, and so on. Scammers often operate solo, which clearly doesn't meet the criteria for a full-fledged casino company even if they planned to.

Additionally, we must see all this effort as being intended to ensure that gamblers have a reason to have an opportunity of using a casino to play, even at the worst condition whereby they don't have anything to start with, but at least meeting up with the conditions for some of the promotions they made by the bonus given could go a long way in ensuring that there have every means to gamble and also earn as the case may be.

This is exactly the reason why casinos give bonuses, promotions, even giveaways for free. Because if you gamble somewhere, and like it, then even if you lose all that you were given, there is a huge chance that you will want to play some more and this time you will deposit. This is why there are so many people saying that they made money from free spins and free bets, because bitz knows that if they do this, then those people will be able to actually come back and gamble with their own money next time they want to gamble.