You are just helping him prove what they said. It appears that both of their accounts were hacked, and the hacker managed to take a loan from Peanutswar's account, but was unsuccessful with Woodie's account. It appears that the person who accessed their account is the same person, and they sent coins to their other wallet. No one posted about any wallet connections back then, but Woodie already said that it wasn't him who requested the loan.

I think you will find a couple more addresses from different accounts that hackers used in this forum to request loans. I could be wrong assuming they are innocent, but I would give them the benefit of the doubt and won't judge them if there is no concrete evidence.

That is true, an owner who's not around is where his employees might play around some ideas on their mind that they could the business in trouble. And that's why if they're not paying attention to details like this, there is a chance that an owner will be fooled by his employees and will find them stealing their customers, their resources and almost everything. So, guarding it should still be done even if the owner feels that his employees are trustworthy. It's a business and even if you trust your employees, never remove an eye to them.

Notice again, If I don't do a compair in the layer capture below, maybe people will be confused about the link being shared.
In this screenshot, although the writing is different, it seems to show the same incident.


For the post in this screenshot above, the original post is still here ^Archives


As for the post in this screenshot, the original post has been deleted but the archive is still here

---

History Wallet is connected here
https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/18b4608bae300833416689160c4e64a574585f656ff2ff74896484450cfa5f2b

---

Suspicious Merit Distribution here^Archives

---

If you just want to show a different IP, it's pretty easy to use a VPN. So I don't think the statement about sharing IP makes any sense.
After all, so far they have not been able to provide convincing evidence. 

You can insult people because they are addicted to gambling he can be not there force because is naturally for some people they thought gambling is a way of getting more money and they turn it to a place of source of income, so any funds they have to spend it all in gambling thinking that they can get rich through gambling and is always unpredictable is a lucky game, gamblers always get believe that they will get a win one day so anytime they play and lose they will try again for another day thinking they will win one day and gambling is not like that we shouldn't be putting our faith in it because no guarantee is just a fun game. We just need to think wisely and know what place we put our money because we always take risk always to get money.

Another way of saying "if people do not learn from their mistakes, their mistakes will turn around to turn their life into a mess", yeah, but let's face reality and agree that it's actually possible to hit it big from gambling, right? Yeah, it's possible but not easy.

Many people have made life changing wins from gambling, and when I say life changing wins, I mean winning money in hundred of thousands of dollar, which could be running into tens to hundreds of millions, even billions when converted to our respective local currencies, what this means for the poor and average man in terms of financial status is that he has become rich, rich in money and wealthy later if they will invest the money well..
But the thing is that those who win money like this don't false it, it just comes, but gamblers who end up addicted always try to false themselves to win like this which is part of the mistake they make..

all businesses have good days and bad days but one should just push through the bad days by determination and consistency that is what it will take to make your business sustainable remember that bad days are inevitable you just have to be prepared for it

Week#54 payment has been processed- 61400b39415435e12651bcdd38a27d44ed6c84f3038c851ebbaef94e72563e44

New participants list:
Please take a look at the sheet and make sure your BTC addy is correct. DM me if anything changes.

To all whom I had to remove-
As I announced earlier, due to the budget cut, I had no choice left.

Thank you for your feedback! Indeed it's a placeholder for now. After our beta phase ends we will update everything accordingly. Our platform offers fixed odds like a sportsbook and is not peer to peer. We focus more on games, creators and crypto, not sports (for now at least). As we grow, we will be adding a lot more markets. 

It's so disappointing that casino's would pretend to offer false services just to get more customers, I wonder if they think that potential customers are idiots and won't figure out on the long run. Imagine winning and trying to withdraw then the casinos ask for my personal details before collecting my reward, I'll be so pissed. That's why I mostly check the features of new casino before making deposit and with this act, i think they'll lose lots of potential customers who would be willing to deposit and entertain themselves with their platform. To every gambler out there be sure to review a casino before rushing to make deposit.

Response to the discussion:

First, I want to thank Coyster and coupable for highlighting the core issue here. It is not about my transaction history—it is about the illegal precedent Binance is trying to set.

To Shishir99: You are asking me to prove my innocence to you or to Binance. That is not how the law works. If Binance has evidence of a crime, they are legally required to report it to law enforcement. It has been 37 days, and they have provided ZERO police case numbers or court orders. Instead of following the law, they are trying to "negotiate" a ransom.

The "Bazaar" Logic:

 >   If I am a "scammer," why did Binance offer to release my funds if I pay them $5,000?

 >   Since when does a global exchange offer a 60% discount on fraud (dropping the demand from $12.5k to $5k)?

  >  Why is the money being sent to a manual external wallet instead of a verified original source through a legal reversal?

As coupable correctly noted, this is a financial penalty acting as a ransom. Binance is acting as the accuser, the judge, and the beneficiary of the funds. This is a total breakdown of VASP regulations.

Update on legal actions: > I am no longer waiting for Binance's "permission" to access my own property. I have officially filed complaints with the following authorities today:

 1  Seychelles FSA (Nest Services Limited's primary regulator).

 2   ADGM FSRA (Abu Dhabi, where Binance holds its latest 2026 license).

 3  Financial Ombudsman.

I have provided all logs, the "negotiation" screenshots, and the demand for external wallet transfers. If Binance believes they are right, they can now explain their "ransomware-style" compliance to the ADGM regulators.

To aioc: I include influencers because a multi-billion dollar corporation only fears one thing: reputational damage. When the law is ignored, the only tool left is the light of the community.

I will keep everyone updated on the response from the regulators.

Nuclear bombs shortened ww2 considerately, wouldn't you agree?
Hitler's scientist were working on the same thing at the same time, or shortly before.
Obviously the longer the US can avoid the every countries nuclear bombs they'll do so for self preservation.
 

Regardless of the situation of OP about the sources of his deposits, Binance is not entitled to take action outside its own ecosystem. In this case, the platform issued a financial penalty like, or something like the ransom. I wished OP asked the support about which exact rule in their TOS he broke and why they froze his deposit at first place. Note that deposits from mixers are automatically flagged but never blocked until paying an insane amount as ransom.

I know about many kinds of disputes especially in the peer to peer market because users are using local payment methods that binance mignt find it hard to verify, but this is the first time I see a case like this.

The one that I can remember is freebitco.in, but I do not know if it the site is now licensed. In the past, it was unlicensed, also according to some sources, it is not yet a licensed gambling site. I do not trust such gambling sites and I can not use the site after it has done issues on this forum.

But anonymous gambling sites are gambling sites that people do not need to provide any identity information to the gambling sites. So, literally, gambling sites that do not request for KYC are anonymous gambling sites..

Thanks for posting it.
I appreciate that you took the time to take a screenshot and post it here. I have already posted my feelings about it in another thread in the reputation board. As I mentioned earlier, it was too challenging for me to earn the first few merits. I didn't even know how I could earn merits. I even asked for tips and tricks from forum members about how I can earn some merits and probably join the signature campaign.

I will probably be able to reach my next rank in this forum within a couple of months and I am too excited about it. However, I do not even dream about 8888 merits. That is not for ordinary people like me.

Yeah, the majority of USDT come from that. When you don't play you can simply stake your balance in the staking wallet for 15% APY, making it attractive to accumulate it.

The VIP manager R.Roland is not answering other messages other than asking me to make a 500 USDT withdrawal:


I've been waiting as well for an answer from @sujonali1819 before taking further action.

@Shishir99, congratulations for your triple 8 merit combination.
I wanted to celebrate seeing a great merit888 combination on your profile. I hope to be able to present your merit combination in a bigger 8888 size in the future.

According to their official representative, the 2nd statement is correct. As for the first one, their platform is completely a new product. This is what found in their pervious replies.

---

Thank you for the honest answer, I really liked how you are responding to each users one by one, ignoring none. Users really appreciate active supports when it comes to casinos.
As for the T&C part, it should be understandable for the users. Right now it's kind of messy to me, hard to read and remember all that. There can be a general terms and conditions with clear sets of instruction. What can do, what cannot do and so on. I hope you understood the point.

Bitcointalk has its own rhythm, and we chose to return with substance rather than fragmented replies. We’ve been reviewing all questions carefully and addressing them in a structured way.


By Gamblers for Gamblers” isn’t a marketing invention, it’s a positioning. Many platforms claim it, few actually build decision-making around player behavior, risk, UX, and payout realities.
We’ve operated in crypto and gambling roles for over a decade, as players, operators, risk managers, and platform builders.
 Running a casino isn’t about slogans, it’s about execution. That’s where we differentiate.


Region restrictions are not arbitrary, they’re enforced to stay compliant with licensing and risk frameworks. Being offshore does not mean being careless.
Sportsbook is planned and will be rolled out, it just was not a priority for the initial launch.
Restrictions may relax over time, but compliance always comes first.


VPN usage is not encouraged where it masks jurisdictional restrictions. Users must comply with local laws and our licensing requirements.
We agree that T&Cs should be readable, we’re already working on simplifying and clarifying key sections without removing legal accuracy.
Clear rules protect both players and operators.


Appreciate that, thank you!
A clean, fast UI is intentional. We’ll keep refining it as we scale.


KYC is not triggered by “winning big” alone. It’s applied only where legally required or in cases of fraud, AML risk, or account abuse.
We’re reviewing our ToS wording to make this even clearer. Transparency is non-negotiable.


Exactly.
No legitimate platform can operate without safeguards. “Non KYC” does not mean “no controls” it means proportional controls.

Didn't they make it clear that they will ask for the KYC at the first withdrawal? This means that they are a KYC-compliant casino, with the only difference being that you can make a deposit, play (as I understand this), but cannot withdraw unless you have done the KYC. The best thing to do with such casinos is to deposit after doing the KYC, so there aren't any withdrawal problems.

However, think of someone who wants to gamble only to enjoy and also does not care about the withdrawals and does not want to do KYC. He may deposit and keep the winnings inside the casino. He uses that money to keep on gambling and also do not do KYC. Interesting 

Congratulations. It is always difficult for low rank members to survive in this community but since you came so far, you are adopting well. Continue the journey until the Full Member rank. Good luck.

You will be soon a legendary member until then enjoy your Hero status. You have more responsibility now. This 888 reminds me a casino 😊

Apart from PrimeDice, one of the oldest crypto casino I know was pocketdice.io. As far as I know, they closed because the owner suddenly disappeared, leaving their gamblers hanging, unable to withdraw/process their funds out of the casino.

I remember reading that they also scammed their players on their new casino.