Baofeng's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned Baofeng in the past 7 days

Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 03:14:57 AM

It's sad to see they are secretly enrolling alts in my campaign. Many other campaigns exist these days, and almost all have the same payment structure. Why enroll in the same campaign?

Since there's no concrete proof of Kemarit being an alt (although likely they are), I'll process his payment, while I'll hold both Jating and Baofeng's payment until they give an explanation that proves they aren't alt. In addition, I'll ask for all the payments that have been ripped from this campaign. Otherwise, red tag + flag will be created.

Have sent DM to all of them.

Edit-
Coincidence that both Jating and Kemarit haven't posted the required number of posts last week. I can't remember if I have ever seen Kemarit miss the post requirements.

These kinds of scammers need to be called out. It's the reputation of the campaign manager on the line. That is not cool. Undecided

Sorry that happened to you, Little Mouse.

It's sad to see they are secretly enrolling alts in my campaign. Many other campaigns exist these days, and almost all have the same payment structure. Why enroll in the same campaign?

Since there's no concrete proof of Kemarit being an alt (although likely they are), I'll process his payment, while I'll hold both Jating and Baofeng's payment until they give an explanation that proves they aren't alt. In addition, I'll ask for all the payments that have been ripped from this campaign. Otherwise, red tag + flag will be created.

Have sent DM to all of them.

I suspect the real reason OP is using an alt account is because he is a cheater as well and doesn't want to draw more attention to his main account(s). This and the need to shittalk are the two primary reasons why people create these kinds of alt accounts.

Setting OP's poor attitude aside, the shared address between Jating and Baofeng is pretty damning.

Quote from: nayib bukkake on April 27, 2025, 11:23:48 PM

In the next block, these addresses, along with Jating's signature campaign address bc1qx6qxfksg38jmhjwp0tmdgg3krqtjyw80gcaujz, are included in consolidation transaction
418ce5b28d388e6b3be0f385b5051e5f954953e3982d0c0ecb4c5e4a10d54c88
Looking at the history of the addresses in this transaction suggests they might belong to an exchange, which might explain the commingling of Baofeng and Kemarit's transfers with Jating's funds. Perhaps Jating is not an alt account and just happens to use the same exchange.

Yes, you are looking at a consolidation on an exchange. So its not enough to say that all 3 accounts belong to the same person. However, I have a hard time believing that Jating and Baofeng are not alts based on the shared use of 0xfa5f27e61d409fe72c5fdcdbc3392d365f1ecf00. As they are both rather established accounts I'd like to see them offer some kind of explanation before tagging them. Although I honestly can't think of what it would be.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 12:10:40 AM

... but I do want to point out that you should have some balls and use your main account when accusing people of wrongdoings. Don't be a coward, it's not like you will get into trouble for posting things like this.

I don't know what your problem is with this. I know you repeat it a lot in these cases but precisely the alts are allowed for things like this. In the original quote from theymos he was referring to alts to say controversial things in politics matters but I think it applies equally here. If it is legitimate to create an alt to say political opinions that you don't want to say with your main account it is also legitimate to try to reveal cheaters.

As for the evidence presented in the OP I find this more relevant:

Quote from: nayib bukkake on April 27, 2025, 11:23:48 PM

However, there are these bounty applications where Jating and Baofeng use the same address:

Than this:

Quote from: nayib bukkake on April 27, 2025, 11:23:48 PM

On February 25, the payment for the Betpanda signature campaign was made in transaction e754321bbd2b4049c3ae2462c048e4fae52c846b16ebcf6015d38289747b9a4b
Kemarit sends his payment to address bc1qnfg74ycx774tkk9d82vh9900t25xjgv08l7kn4
Baofeng sends his payment to address bc1qhp6hq70za7yle52gpnssvekyj9p9vmxnrre8qv
Both of these transfers use the same feerate and are included in the same block.

In the next block, these addresses, along with Jating's signature campaign address bc1qx6qxfksg38jmhjwp0tmdgg3krqtjyw80gcaujz, are included in consolidation transaction
418ce5b28d388e6b3be0f385b5051e5f954953e3982d0c0ecb4c5e4a10d54c88
Looking at the history of the addresses in this transaction suggests they might belong to an exchange,

Quote from: Baofeng on April 27, 2025, 09:00:38 AM

Good for you mate, I finally won the first price in the last game with that 696x. Although there is some tough competition as usual as there are entries that hit 500x. But I guess luck is on my side winning this week's tournament.

Congrats, bro! Honestly, when you’re one of the first to submit in that thread, it really gives you a lot of hope that you might end up as one of the winners, or even grab the first prize.
But then, someone always sneaks in with their huge multiplier entry right in the final minutes before the contest ends, lol.

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 10:22:24 PM

Quote from: Russlenat on April 20, 2025, 11:05:37 AM

Nagbabasa nga ako ng discussions, mukhang maganda ang feedback. kung babalik ang mixers, mas beneficial rin sa forum kasi maraming mag advertise ng mixers nila, at dadami na rin ang maging active dito sa forum. Let's just wait for the update, hopefully meron ng final update this year ang admin.

Yes, tama ka dyan, alam din ng mga crypto mixers na ito talaga ang pinakamalaking community pag dating sa pag promote nila so sana bumalik nga rin. Pero nasa Admin pari nang desisyon nito. Siguro pinag iisipan nya talaga ang magiging complication nito satin at sa kanya personally.

At kung napansin nyo, isa sa campaign na isang crypto mixer na na take down ng authorities ay halos isang taon na hindi active.

For sure kung babalik na naman ang crypto mixing campaign dito, tiyak ako magiging active na naman to.

Malaki ang possibly na bumalik. Sobrang active nga nila sa altcointalk what if pa kaya kung iallow ulit ang mixer dito sa bitcointalk syempre magsisibalikan nyan dito kasi alam nila na mas madaming user dito at maraming possible customer dito.

Ang pinaka problema lang talaga nila ngayon is maghintay na iallow ni Theymos ang bitcoin mixing service dito sa bitcointalk kasi sigurado naman na papayagan ulit sila dito mag advertise..

The following three accounts currently enrolled in the Betpanda signature campaign seem to be connected. It's possible that I am mistaken but I don't believe these suspicions are entirely unfounded.

The three accounts are: Baofeng, Kemarit, and Jating. I have interacted with them many times over the years and I have noticed their writing has many similarities. All these users also have the same merit fishing tactic of making scam/malware warning threads. This isn't a smoking gun necessarily because people can pick up on certain habits and mannerisms from each other when you are from the same region, share many of the same interests and always visit the same forum boards so I decided to look a bit further.

On February 25, the payment for the Betpanda signature campaign was made in transaction e754321bbd2b4049c3ae2462c048e4fae52c846b16ebcf6015d38289747b9a4b
Kemarit sends his payment to address bc1qnfg74ycx774tkk9d82vh9900t25xjgv08l7kn4
Baofeng sends his payment to address bc1qhp6hq70za7yle52gpnssvekyj9p9vmxnrre8qv
Both of these transfers use the same feerate and are included in the same block.

In the next block, these addresses, along with Jating's signature campaign address bc1qx6qxfksg38jmhjwp0tmdgg3krqtjyw80gcaujz, are included in consolidation transaction
418ce5b28d388e6b3be0f385b5051e5f954953e3982d0c0ecb4c5e4a10d54c88
Looking at the history of the addresses in this transaction suggests they might belong to an exchange, which might explain the commingling of Baofeng and Kemarit's transfers with Jating's funds. Perhaps Jating is not an alt account and just happens to use the same exchange.

However, there are these bounty applications where Jating and Baofeng use the same address:

Quote from: Jating on August 13, 2024, 01:45:11 PM

Bitcointalk Username: Jating
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=763588
Forum Rank: Hero Member
USDT Address (ARB USDT): 0xfa5f27e61d409fe72c5fdcdbc3392d365f1ecf00
Merits gained in 180 days: 56

Quote from: Baofeng on July 25, 2024, 07:12:49 AM

Bitcointalk Username: Baofeng
BSC wallet address: 0xfa5f27e61d409fe72c5fdcdbc3392d365f1ecf00

I do not have any negative feeling against these users and hope there is a reasonable explanation for all of this. I only shared these details to get some clarification about these suspicions I had and determine if there was indeed cheating or if I am actually mistaken.

Quote from: _BlackStar on Today at 10:09:03 PM

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 09:00:38 AM

Quote from: dimonstration on April 23, 2025, 12:39:41 PM

-snip-

Good for you mate, I finally won the first price in the last game with that 696x. Although there is some tough competition as usual as there are entries that hit 500x. But I guess luck is on my side winning this week's tournament.

If so - then I really hope that this will be a lucky week for you. You win a multiplier of 696x - that seems rare and it's certainly a lucky win. I've never had that much - of course because I don't play slots much, whether it's tournaments or regular games.

But for you - may this be your lucky week, mate.

Big winning you have there alot of slot players are hoping to hit such big multipliers to increase their prize, but yeah yours was quite a big luck that is hard to come by all the time, so let celebrate this one, I know that when you saw that user coming close with the 500x multipliers you weren't so touched since you had quite a Large gap, so no one can easily beat your multipliers luck.

Quote from: _BlackStar on Today at 10:09:03 PM

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 09:00:38 AM

Quote from: dimonstration on April 23, 2025, 12:39:41 PM

-snip-

Good for you mate, I finally won the first price in the last game with that 696x. Although there is some tough competition as usual as there are entries that hit 500x. But I guess luck is on my side winning this week's tournament.

If so - then I really hope that this will be a lucky week for you. You win a multiplier of 696x - that seems rare and it's certainly a lucky win. I've never had that much - of course because I don't play slots much, whether it's tournaments or regular games.

But for you - may this be your lucky week, mate.

And it just shows the luck really play a big roll in slot game competitions. I have seen those who hit even close to 1000x but didn't win the competition as others have hit higher. And then some who might be along that like 500x but good enough as others didn't have that luck to hit a big multiplier.

So congrats to those who are that lucky for this weeks competition. As new one opens up, let's see those familiar names trying to beat each other.

In any case for those sports bettors out there, it's Monday so just check out this one:

https://betpanda.io/en/promo/monday-freebet

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 09:00:38 AM

Quote from: dimonstration on April 23, 2025, 12:39:41 PM

-snip-

Good for you mate, I finally won the first price in the last game with that 696x. Although there is some tough competition as usual as there are entries that hit 500x. But I guess luck is on my side winning this week's tournament.

If so - then I really hope that this will be a lucky week for you. You win a multiplier of 696x - that seems rare and it's certainly a lucky win. I've never had that much - of course because I don't play slots much, whether it's tournaments or regular games.

But for you - may this be your lucky week, mate.

Quote from: AmoreJaz on April 26, 2025, 11:51:24 PM

Quote from: Baofeng on April 24, 2025, 10:45:06 PM

For those who wants to hear some Manny Pacquiao news:

Quote

WBN received information from sources close to Pacquiao and Barrios that no world title fight is currently being discussed.

https://www.worldboxingnews.com/manny-pacquiao-wbc-return-hold/

So there you have it, there is no title fight being discussed right now, although we have heard that Manny wants to make a comeback at the 147 lbs and challenge which they think is the weakiest amongst them which is Barrios.

Maybe for Pacquiao, the proceeds will be for charitable purposes. Just testing the waters if he has still juice on this sports. His passion is really showing here as Pacquiao still wants to try if he has still some power left. However, based from the article, there's no solid statement from Pacquiao's camp that they will push thru this match as he is focus on the upcoming election right now. I believe, it is better for him to really hang his gloves and just enjoy his retirement. Better get away from politics as well. He will only suffer headache in this arena.

Maybe, but still though, he is not young anymore, his age is already showing, and even in his last exhibition fight, Manny was just a shade of himself. If he wanted to help charitable institutions then he could do like fun raising.

Itself of fighting again in the ring that he might regret later. In any case, he is running for the Senate and I think if he wins then this whole comeback fight is not going to happen anymore as he will be busy again.

Mentioning all the previous participants

Code:

freedomgo
Baofeng
Little Mouse
Bitinity
iv4n
xLays
xGennady
hopenotlate
rafaloko
Ammar M. A.
Dump3er
|MINER|
jayce
PX-Z
memehunter
Patikno
Unknown Op
dimonstration
Mr. Magkaisa
Potato Chips

Quote from: Baofeng on April 24, 2025, 10:45:06 PM

For those who wants to hear some Manny Pacquiao news:

Quote

WBN received information from sources close to Pacquiao and Barrios that no world title fight is currently being discussed.

https://www.worldboxingnews.com/manny-pacquiao-wbc-return-hold/

So there you have it, there is no title fight being discussed right now, although we have heard that Manny wants to make a comeback at the 147 lbs and challenge which they think is the weakiest amongst them which is Barrios.

Maybe for Pacquiao, the proceeds will be for charitable purposes. Just testing the waters if he has still juice on this sports. His passion is really showing here as Pacquiao still wants to try if he has still some power left.

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 08:23:10 PM

-snip-
I agree though as what others have said, discipline is very important. So just stick to your budget as well and not go overboard with it.

That's a point that needs to be noted, because he feels that his team will continue to win and raise the bet beyond the limit he has,
even the amount of money used is still less, this is more like being too greedy before the victory happens because he wants to force a bigger bet.

And he asked for advice on the bets he was going to make, I don't think any advice would be the way out.
You just need to improve your mindset about how much profit you will make and bet with enough money.

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 11:24:38 AM

Quote from: dwyane36 on Today at 10:04:28 AM

Quote from: Dave1 on Today at 08:13:35 AM

For this game? Luka was more of a liability in both ends of the court, he just scored 17 points, a far dismay from his average. And then the Wolves decided to go physical and it's their homecourt so the Lakers was not able to steal this one.

The Lakers-Wolves series isn't progressing the way I expected. LeBron didn't score much in the first two games, and now Luka is having trouble with his field goal percentage. If in the first two games, Randle and ANT were the main difficulties for the Lakers, now McDaniels has also joined in, unexpectedly scoring 30 points in the third game.

Luka has struggled in his game because it was reported that he had stomach illness, so it really affected his performance. So that is a big factor for them to lose the game tonight because their top scorer is not feeling well. Although Lebron and Reaves try their best to really fought all the way, but when you have the likes of McDaniels who suddenly scores that kind of points, it's hard to bet the Wolves.

Imagine if Luka is healthy all throughout the game. This could've been a blowout at least, and it would be the same as what happened in Game 2. Well, it is what it is. I believe that Luka's healthy, and Lebron and Reaves plays and scores like this, they can defeat the Wolves easily. In this game, they didn't gave Robert that much minutes because the Lakers are hunting him because of how awful he is of a defender especially if he got switched with Luka. They're just toying with him, and the adjustment that the Wolves made somewhat made them better.

Also, I like the respect of ANT towards Lebron and in this game. He also said that Lebron is shooting from "Yucatan" which some might not know that place. If you can find it in Google Map, please share it here. Grin

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 11:24:38 AM

Great game as well between the Magic and the Celtics, Magic escape with a win. Also the Bucks stops the trash talking Pacers as they beat them, as Gary Trent exploding with 9 three point shots setting a record for the Bucks with 37 big points.

Magic only escape the win because the ball bounced at the back of the rim and it took around 2.6 seconds before somebody got the ball. It was only 0.3 seconds left when the Celtics called a timeout hence, the victory of the Magic. I'm not saying that the bounce of the ball made the Magic won, but if that ball bounced in a different way, the Celtics might have a higher chance of winning it still. We know the capabilities of the Celtics. The Magic won and now it's 2-1.

As for the Bucks-Pacers, it's a must win for them, and they got it. In the absence of Lillard who only scored 7 points, Trent stepped up making 9 3-pt FG which tied for the most in a game in playoff history. The question now is, will he be a consistent shooter all throughout the series? Can he step up if Lillard's having a bad night obviously because of the injury because Giannis needs help from other teammates in terms of offense. If only they didn't trade Middleton. Huh

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 11:24:38 AM

Quote from: dwyane36 on Today at 10:04:28 AM

Quote from: Dave1 on Today at 08:13:35 AM

For this game? Luka was more of a liability in both ends of the court, he just scored 17 points, a far dismay from his average. And then the Wolves decided to go physical and it's their homecourt so the Lakers was not able to steal this one.

The Lakers-Wolves series isn't progressing the way I expected. LeBron didn't score much in the first two games, and now Luka is having trouble with his field goal percentage. If in the first two games, Randle and ANT were the main difficulties for the Lakers, now McDaniels has also joined in, unexpectedly scoring 30 points in the third game.

Luka has struggled in his game because it was reported that he had stomach illness, so it really affected his performance. So that is a big factor for them to lose the game tonight because their top scorer is not feeling well. Although Lebron and Reaves try their best to really fought all the way, but when you have the likes of McDaniels who suddenly scores that kind of points, it's hard to bet the Wolves.

Great game as well between the Magic and the Celtics, Magic escape with a win. Also the Bucks stops the trash talking Pacers as they beat them, as Gary Trent exploding with 9 three point shots setting a record for the Bucks with 37 big points.

Luka also had one of his "complaining about everything" days. And that's always a bad sign because of shows that his focus is not in the right place. In games like these this is crucial for the lakers since they aren't really deep so to speak. Still of course he is a walking bucket but in game 3 even Gobert got the best of him in a 1vs1 scenario. And this means something since Luka loves to put moves on big guys like Gobert.

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 11:24:38 AM

Quote from: dwyane36 on Today at 10:04:28 AM

Quote from: Dave1 on Today at 08:13:35 AM

For this game? Luka was more of a liability in both ends of the court, he just scored 17 points, a far dismay from his average. And then the Wolves decided to go physical and it's their homecourt so the Lakers was not able to steal this one.

The Lakers-Wolves series isn't progressing the way I expected. LeBron didn't score much in the first two games, and now Luka is having trouble with his field goal percentage. If in the first two games, Randle and ANT were the main difficulties for the Lakers, now McDaniels has also joined in, unexpectedly scoring 30 points in the third game.

Luka has struggled in his game because it was reported that he had stomach illness, so it really affected his performance. So that is a big factor for them to lose the game tonight because their top scorer is not feeling well. Although Lebron and Reaves try their best to really fought all the way, but when you have the likes of McDaniels who suddenly scores that kind of points, it's hard to bet the Wolves.

Great game as well between the Magic and the Celtics, Magic escape with a win. Also the Bucks stops the trash talking Pacers as they beat them, as Gary Trent exploding with 9 three point shots setting a record for the Bucks with 37 big points.

We could see that he's really suffering from his illness also Reddick had an interview about it https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AoK_hUdyNWc

So with that Luka is not 100% but still he manage to play and contribute for Lakers. To bad for them that Wolves see some good opportunity to outscored them and take the win on Game 3. For sure there would be a good revenge game for Lakers in Game 4 since they provably want to take the win so bad or else they will be in trouble and get home early. Lakers would really struggle especially that Wolves roster is complete and they are also performing good in this series.

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +31 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (59) 13193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 8131 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 18321: OgNasty (Trust: +75 / =3 / -7) (DT1! (5) 4279 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 24140: qwk (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2528 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 30747: Vod (Trust: +30 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (15) 2249 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2549 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 8633 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3859 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2352 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2267 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (3) 7479 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (0) 7477 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +51 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 1392 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 123824: albon (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1384 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1507 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +55 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (19) 5288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1344 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (8) 6200 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (32) 1766 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2268 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 11049 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5849 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6008 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +35 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (15) 6327 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 314792: examplens (Trust: +7 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2828 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 346731: minerjones (Trust: +145 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2982 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3739 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 3174 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 10530 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 10295 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 400366: sandy-is-fine (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 230 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4380 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1813 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 405889: SyGambler (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 804 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2687 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 7511 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 698159: Jet Cash (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1979 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 740502: condoras (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 614 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 811213: polymerbit (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 953 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +38 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 413 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1403 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3327 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1040 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 984384: Baofeng (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 986781: imhoneer (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 1343 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5747 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +102 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 3682 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1673 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1045971: Igebotz (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1891 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1900 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 13954 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1902 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2734 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1133335: Coin-1 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 2365 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +64 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 10253 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1164368: GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1321 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1200 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1934 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1285450: Agrawas (Trust: +63 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 579 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 8135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1339716: coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1509 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2809 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 6539 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11138 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 3129 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3235 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2157 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3098 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 18009 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1998 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2293 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 1894120: madnessteat (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2530 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2274 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4910 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1360 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2143453: 1miau (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 7251 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1807 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3586 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 752 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1503 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1098 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2718725: Lachrymose (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1128 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 8288 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1450 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4881 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5477 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 930 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2502 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 624 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (7500 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (752 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (25 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (192 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6347: Maged (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (427 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 13813: smooth (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (198 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 15510: Mousepotato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 16248: SolarSilver (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 18312: phantastisch (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (363 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: dimonstration on Today at 11:05:41 AM

Quote from: Maslate on Today at 11:01:34 AM

Good news that it’s coming from him .. he knows what he’s talking about. But of course, they still need an MRI to confirm everything. Based on how it looks though, it seems like Butler might be able to return this season. I’m really hoping for that, especially since I bet on the Warriors to win the series.

But honestly, even if he doesn’t come back, I’m still confident. Maybe they’ll finally start using Kuminga again.

Jimmy Butler is way better than Kuminga but they don’t have choice than to use him if Butler will be out for this playoffs.

Kuminga has no defense and play a lot of error especially on crucial on time in contrary with Butler that is reliable when needed on crucial time.

I’m not putting hope that GSW will advance many rounds on this playoffs without Jimmy because it’s proven that they are not playing well during regular season with this same line-up.

But Kerr needs Kuminga right now since Butler will be out for a couple of games. If I remember correctly, Curry has this similar fall before the end of the regular season and he has missed multiple games. So now it's about time that Kuminga needs to see some action to help the Warriors.

The good thing is that they are going to play in their homecourt so they needed that. Fans behind them and egging them to win again. And just like what others have said, we can only hope that Jimmy will be alright and just needed some time to rest.

I think it’s time for Buddy Hield to step up his game again! Grin

Kerr is indeed no choice than to use Kuminga as substitute to Butler. Besides, The only reason why Kuminga put on the non active role is because of conflict with Butler game.

Kuminga needs to become versatile and key role player in able to sync with Butler and Warriors.

Quote from: Yaunfitda on April 23, 2025, 11:48:07 PM

Quote from: Sanitough on April 23, 2025, 10:46:28 PM

Quote from: Baofeng on April 23, 2025, 09:19:08 PM

I do not think that they we will see a comeback from them. Lillard did play in their last game but they still fell short. Maybe they can win some games against the Pacers, but that's it. It could be 4-2 in the end.

Lillard did struggle with his shot (4-13 FG), but he’ll likely bounce back at home. Remember what the Bucks did in the 2021 Finals? They were down 0-2 but won four straight to claim the title. To all Bucks backers here ... keep the faith. As long as Giannis plays at MVP level, this team always has comeback potential. Cheesy

Definitely we can't compare that version of the Bucks as compare to today, Buddy Hield is no longer with them, he is a good defender and can lock up any PG or SG and then they have the prime Khris Middleton (pre-injury) and is clutch and then have a good defensive mindset under coach Mike Budenholzer. Now, they only have Giannis, Lillard is no longer at his prime, they swap Middleton to a young Kyle Kuzma who is still a non-factor and probably just another player in the league. While the Pacers have built this team for years, have been gone on a playoff run last season so they improved a lot and that's why they are the favorite in this series. So I do agree that the Pacers will win this series and another frustrating year for Giannis to exit in the first round.

Indeed that's a different lineup which composed of 2-way players like Jrue Holiday and PJ Tucker both players gave Giannis aid to Giannis as they really good in defending stars, I used to remember how Tucker defend KD when they meet in the second round, those kinds of defense helps them to reched and earn the title.

Though let see how Dame will respond with that poor performance knowing him there's always a surprise with Giannis putting everything and trying to win it will be a different situation when playing at home.

Quote from: Baofeng on April 23, 2025, 12:03:46 PM

We have seen a lot of Bitcoin influencers in the past though, and they only have that kind of impact to a certain extent like Elon. And then market gets tired of him and we forget what he had done.

So same here, although he is going to serve for the next 4 year, but then again there will be a time that everything he says will backfire and if there is a influence in the market then it will all be good.

Trump's influence is completely different and much greater than anyone else's, even Elon's. He is the president of the United States, his economic policies will have a strong impact on the world economy while Bitcoin is a part of the economy as well as depends too much on the macro and geopolitical situation. So I don't think Bitcoin is immune to Trump or the US government.

Quote from: Baofeng on April 23, 2025, 12:03:46 PM

Because if we believed that he can really influence then next year we will have a bear market, so imagine what will be price movement by that time.

It would be ridiculous if next year bitcoin goes into a bear market, gets dumped, and everyone starts blaming Trump. That's not fair because we all know that markets are cyclical. If this cycle repeats, 2026 will be the year we enter bear season and in every bear season, bitcoin always gets dumped hard.

Quote from: Sanitough on Today at 10:46:28 PM

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 09:19:08 PM

I do not think that they we will see a comeback from them. Lillard did play in their last game but they still fell short. Maybe they can win some games against the Pacers, but that's it. It could be 4-2 in the end.

Lillard did struggle with his shot (4-13 FG), but he’ll likely bounce back at home. Remember what the Bucks did in the 2021 Finals? They were down 0-2 but won four straight to claim the title. To all Bucks backers here ... keep the faith. As long as Giannis plays at MVP level, this team always has comeback potential. Cheesy

Definitely we can't compare that version of the Bucks as compare to today, Buddy Hield is no longer with them, he is a good defender and can lock up any PG or SG and then they have the prime Khris Middleton (pre-injury) and is clutch and then have a good defensive mindset under coach Mike Budenholzer. Now, they only have Giannis, Lillard is no longer at his prime, they swap Middleton to a young Kyle Kuzma who is still a non-factor and probably just another player in the league. While the Pacers have built this team for years, have been gone on a playoff run last season so they improved a lot and that's why they are the favorite in this series. So I do agree that the Pacers will win this series and another frustrating year for Giannis to exit in the first round.

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 09:19:08 PM

I do not think that they we will see a comeback from them. Lillard did play in their last game but they still fell short. Maybe they can win some games against the Pacers, but that's it. It could be 4-2 in the end.

Lillard did struggle with his shot (4-13 FG), but he’ll likely bounce back at home. Remember what the Bucks did in the 2021 Finals? They were down 0-2 but won four straight to claim the title. To all Bucks backers here ... keep the faith. As long as Giannis plays at MVP level, this team always has comeback potential. Cheesy

Quote from: Baofeng on April 22, 2025, 08:23:25 PM

Quote from: dimonstration on April 21, 2025, 03:06:28 PM

Quote from: Little Mouse on April 21, 2025, 07:12:38 AM

I spent $100 last week only manage to win an ~170x, which I didn't submitted either.

This time, I manage to hit x279 using only 34USDT bankroll that comes from the previous contest.

I can’t believe that hit the bonus round when my balance is already down to 6$ only and manage to come back by keep risking my profit for a chance spin on bonus.

This proves that even only small balance can hit a high multiplier when luck hits us hard. Finally, I experienced the luck on this slot game.

Sorry mate, I finally got back luck back with a good 696x hit. Grin

I lost above half of my capital and then suddenly I hit a bonus round and hit that multiplier. At least I have something to join the slot multiplier again as I have said, my luck was not that good in the last couple of months after hitting almost 1000x, but that was just good enough for second place.

No worries bro. I’m happy that you manage to win and compete this week. I do experience a huge win when I made a bonus buy purchase so I’m not really aiming now to win any place on the tournament.

I think most of us now is on luck mode. Much better if we capitalize on this luck now.

This is my big win and final balance from that 34$ bankroll.

Quote from: Baofeng on Today at 08:23:25 PM

Sorry mate, I finally got back luck back with a good 696x hit. Grin

I lost above half of my capital and then suddenly I hit a bonus round and hit that multiplier. At least I have something to join the slot multiplier again as I have said, my luck was not that good in the last couple of months after hitting almost 1000x, but that was just good enough for second place.

That's awesome to hear,congrats! Hitting a multiplier like that is definitely a rare moment in slot games, not something you experience every day. Now choose your reward wisely and make the most out of that lucky win!

Quote from: Baofeng on April 21, 2025, 10:42:33 PM

At siguro obvious naman kasi na kung kaya magbigay ng $100.00 sa Legendary he kaya rin ng campaign na ibigay na mas mataas sa manager.

Siguro malaki pa dito at deserve nila kasi mahirap din mag convince ng mga project na mag launch ng signature campaign dito lalo pat hindi sila familiar sa marketing set up ng Bitcointalk, bukod dun pagpili ng mga participants, at paglatag ng spreadsheet at pag basa ng mga posts ng mga participants.
Kaya masasabi ko na ma trabaho ang trabaho ng mga campaign managers kaya deserve nila ng malaking rates, yung mga campaign managers sila ang tumutulong sa atin para kumita din dito sa Bitcointalk.