hosemary's Bitcointalk Notifications: all posts that quoted or mentioned hosemary in the past 7 days

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 10:02:04 AM

Quote from: Yurkov on Today at 09:57:23 AM

As I wrote, I post in this sections because I enjoy this topics. What is wrong in that?

There is nothing wrong with that.
You can continue posting in "Gambling" and "Gambling Discussion" boards and enjoy them. Is there anything preventing you from posting in those boards that I am unaware of?

Happy to hear that and I hope nothing will prevent me from that.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 09:48:54 AM

Quote from: Yurkov on Today at 09:35:35 AM

I'm in a Kikabet campaign, where the requirement is to write at least 10 posts in the Gambling or Gambling Discussion sections. I often write over 20 a week. If I were posting in these sections just to get paid, I'd probably write the bare minimum.

You wouldn't get paid, if you made only 10 posts.
According to Kikabet signature campaign rules, participants are required to make a minimum of 20 posts to get paid, and at least 10 of them must be in "Gambling" or "Gambling Discussion" boards.

You made all your 20 posts in "Gambling" and "Gambling Discussion", because it was easier for you to post in those boards.
Should we be grateful that you didn't spam the other boards?

As I wrote, I post in this sections because I enjoy this topics. What is wrong in that?

Quote from: DEX.fo_off on July 20, 2026, 05:56:14 PM

Real quick, separate from everything above — a straight explanation, no spin.

Over the last couple of weeks, replying to a lot of people in a single post led to names getting crossed. A few of you got quoted or thanked for suggestions you never actually made, and a few — Kryptowerk, pooya87, xtraelv — got tagged despite never having posted in this thread at all. Ultegra134 and hosemary flagged the same thing earlier too.

That's on us, not on any of you. It happened because whoever was drafting these batch replies was going through a lot of messages at once and mixed up who said what. Human error — someone moving too fast through a long thread and pairing the wrong name to the wrong point. Not any kind of automated system doing this on its own.

Kryptowerk — understand the reaction completely. Getting tagged out of nowhere by a "No KYC" service, with no context, is a legitimate reason to be suspicious. There's nothing else behind it — no data pull, no targeting, just a mistake in how the replies were put together. Sorry for the confusion.

pooya87, xtraelv — same apology. You didn't say what was attributed to you, that's on us.

Going forward we're dropping the habit of tagging specific names in batch replies — clearly error-prone once there's more than a couple of people to respond to in one post. Replies from here address topics without pinning them to individuals.

Thanks for calling it out plainly. Better to hear it straight than have it fester.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

First of, I appreciate the reply. Meaning getting any reply at all at least. However, I don't see an explanation that makes any sense.
How should my name appear out of nowhere in any of your spreadsheets / whatever you are using to create these reples.
I marked the part that gives an explanation without an explanation actually in red. Quote "Mixed up who said what" - Sure, that would make sense, if anything was said at all (by me). There are no messages from my side in any of the relevant threads, how in the first place could it appear in the "drafting" of anything on your side?

It really does not make sense.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 07:07:47 PM

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 06:55:21 PM

and for established forum members.

None of the users who were sigbanned recently were stablished members.

Signature bans used to be a "soft ban" for established members: when an established member got caught with plagiarism, their ban could be replaced for a signature ban (which could last several years).
Now it's a more frequent solution for signature spammers.

Quote from: hosemary on July 20, 2026, 06:51:18 PM

Quote from: TokenTikas on July 20, 2026, 06:46:21 PM

I'm trying to use the Dex.Fo exchange but it's showing this. My internet is working fine and I also tried refreshing but I can't click to go to the next step for the exchange. Has anyone used the Dex.Fo exchange today? Is anyone else facing this problem? I'm entering everything correctly, but I still can't move to the next step in any way.

Unless you were trying to swap Monero, the issue is probably on your end. I just tried it and I was able to place a swap order without any issues.
Try again with a VPN or a different browser and see if it works.

Dex.Fo doesn't work on my Google Browser VPN, but after launching a second free Bowser VPN, the site opens.
Try Windscribe's free VPN, it might be better.

Fellas, a lot of you still waiting to submit. Yeah, tennis is being played - just be careful not to forget.
Last tag, the deadline is in little over 3 hours..

Code:

arallmuus
Bitcoin Smith
buwaytress
chi20
cls63
cryptofrka
darxiaomi
Dump3er
el che
entebah
famososMuertos
Heyshbosh
Hhampuz
HomieAllDay
hosemary
jeremypwr
Koal-84
mitchr4
mv1986
Nheer
notblox1
Note3
Ozymandias_DZ
pina_pino
ralle14
Renato297
Rikafip
Saint-loup
slaman29
Spack17
Trofo
un_rank
vd309
welovebit

Quote from: hosemary on July 20, 2026, 07:08:07 PM

When it comes to countries where cryptocurrencies are banned, people probably can't buy coins easily. But if you are talking about people from restricted countries, they should still be able to buy coins through their local exchanges.

It's not all that clear-cut. The only reason restrictions are being introduced is because the system fears capital flight and the violation of their tax monopoly.

Imagine a situation where there are no banks in your country, and those that are available are either available to the wealthy or sell banking services (or cryptocurrency at huge margins).

For millions of people, digital property is a breath of fresh air after decades of lack of prospects. Therefore, people don't care about restrictions when they have no alternative.

Quote from: LoyceV

May I suggest to just quote a small relevant part of each post? That makes it clear who you're replying to, and you can't really go wrong if you copy/paste the complete quote (but don't make the quote too large).

Good suggestion, and honestly overdue given the mess we made with tags. Switching to this from here — a short quote of the actual line being answered instead of a name tag. Removes the ambiguity completely, since the quote itself shows who said what.

Quote from: hosemary

Try again with a VPN or a different browser and see if it works.

Thanks for jumping in on this one before we even saw it — good call, and turned out to be a stuck session rather than anything on our end. Appreciate you helping TokenTikas get sorted.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Quote from: hmbdofficial on Today at 09:46:49 AM

well, the reason why i will consider it to be unwise to trust the wallet's safety solely on the custom words is the silent wrong wallet issue it might poses, this can be like a possible typo, or capitalization of some words, or sometimes the auto correct from the keyboard also can actually create an entirely different valid wallet with No funds in it.

Hmm I do get your point but what if the words were properly written and the user has a clear image of what he wrote? I think that should mitigate the problem you are trying to explain. Plus I have tested it few times and it seems it is also case sensitive too but I'll do more research.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 10:09:27 AM

If your passphrase provides enough entropy, no one will be able to access your funds, even if they have access to your seed phrase. But this doesn't mean it's wise to rely solely on your passphrase and not protect your seed phrase.
To make your passphrase have high entropy, you have to make it complex, which may introduce some other risks such as writing it down incorrectly. So, I would prefer to have a secure seed phrase, and if I want to have a passphrase, I wouldn't need to make it too complex.

I see.... What if a standard Electrum seed is used and then just a word or two added nothing too complex but simply words unique to the user actually that should cover this issue right?

Quote from: promise444c5 on July 20, 2026, 11:21:11 PM

Will that include answers to the questions being asked on the thread so far, that does not relate to what method you’re using ?

I guess people want answers now, so OK I will answer all the questions already asked, and updated the thread title to fit. In the future this thread will be locked to prevent it from ironically becoming a spam megathread, at which point sigban appeals will have to be individual threads, but for now let's answer some Qs.

Quote from: SuperBitMan on July 20, 2026, 12:28:17 PM

What actually make or determine a post to be a low effort reply.

A few different things. Is the post saying anything of substance or relevance? Does it constitute an attempt to add to discussion, or is just there to occupy space?

Quote from: SuperBitMan on July 20, 2026, 12:28:17 PM

What are the measures used to determine if members are posting in principle for signature campaign payment and not for the sake of contributing actual discussion?

This is actually based on a combination of all the other factors, and the picture they paint of the account's overall behavior.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 20, 2026, 12:57:20 PM

If it's the former only, are you going to make another thread where users can request accounts be looked into or would that be too much drama in your opinion?

For now that might not be a good idea, but in the future maybe.

Quote from: LoyceV on July 20, 2026, 01:30:47 PM

Serious question: do you also have the ability to "undo" those bans? As far as I know most "normal" Mods can only ban, not unban.

Yes, I do... I can also extend them or lessen them.

Quote from: MarryWithBTC on July 20, 2026, 01:42:30 PM

Will you sig ban users based on previously left AI tags by individuals, or this thread marks a new beginning for all.

No, I'm not issuing any retroactive sig bans. Its a "new beginning" alright, but I'm not sure we're thinking the same thing.

Quote from: MarryWithBTC on July 20, 2026, 01:42:30 PM

If you will sig ban users posting previously expressed ideas, this will leave many people banned after the 5th page of every thread.

I'm not being that strict. 5th page is still pretty fresh and young compared to the 1765th page.

Quote from: bangjoe on July 20, 2026, 01:52:13 PM

But I have a little question about the points to focus on in the violations that are made, I think this should be clearer, such as if Bob violate only one of all that is prohibited, then how long the punishment will be given, we need clearer criteria about any law in the forum, or maybe it depends on the subjectivity of the assessor?

You will never be sigbanned for only a single violation or a single weakness. I'm looking at a bunch of different things all put together.

Quote from: PrivacyG on July 20, 2026, 07:58:25 PM

Do you decide on your own analysis whether someone should have their signature banned?

Yes, but using guidelines given by theymos.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 12:23:33 AM

I still would like to see a transparent process with a clear criteria. Otherwise, every signature ban can lead to a never ending debate.

That's understandable. Coming up.

Quote from: Rikafip on July 20, 2026, 05:21:23 PM

Quote from: bangjoe on July 20, 2026, 01:52:13 PM

How about not doing any of those things, and that way not having to worry about getting signature ban?

Of course it's better and that's what we all hope for, but people's perspectives may be different and we need clearer criteria and transparency, as hosemary said, because otherwise there will be a lot of questions about the same thing going forward in the appeal.
Looks like the OP will update it in the coming days on this.

Quote from: Rikafip on July 20, 2026, 05:21:23 PM

Quote from: eternalgloom on July 20, 2026, 04:55:50 PM

So far I've seen 4 banned members:

Why I am not surprised that 3/4 are Stake members. Tongue

Anyway, I am glad that theymos decided to try something new to fight the spam, and most importantly he couldn't chose the better person to do it.

That's a good first step.
I also welcome it very much, as it will change over 90% of how people make posts on forums (if they read this thread).

BTW I've created a thread about this on my local forum so that it becomes a special attention as important information that needs to be spread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5588955.msg66962618#msg66962618
I hope other local forums do as well, as it's rare for people to come to read what's on Meta.

Update on members whose signatures were banned, I hope nothing was missed.

No	\|	User Names	\|	Rank Forum	\|	Last Signature	\|	Ban Expiration Date	\|
1	\|	virasog	\|	Hero Member	\|	Stake Campaign	\|	January 16, 2027, 07:46:00 AM	\|
2	\|	Akbarkoe	\|	Legendary	\|	Stake Campaign	\|	July 15, 2027, 07:33:04 AM	\|
3	\|	fuguebtc	\|	Hero Member	\|	Stake Campaign	\|	January 16, 2027, 07:30:09 AM	\|
4	\|	topbitcoin	\|	Hero Member	\|	Kikabet Campagin	\|	January 16, 2027, 07:31:02 AM	\|
5	\|	tygeade	\|	Legendary	\|	Bitz.io Campaign	\|	January 16, 2027, 11:58:40 PM	\|
6	\|	FanEagle	\|	Legendary	\|	Bitz.io Campaign	\|	January 16, 2027, 11:59:55 PM	\|
7	\|	Danica22	\|	Full Member	\|	Stake Campaign	\|	January 17, 2027, 12:01:00 AM	\|
8	\|	Farhan99	\|	Hero Member	\|	Rainbet Campaign	\|	July 16, 2027, 12:02:07 AM	\|
9	\|	bitgolden	\|	Legendary	\|	Stake Campaign	\|	January 17, 2027, 12:02:58 AM	\|
10	\|	livingfree	\|	Hero Member	\|	Bitlist Campaign	\|	July 16, 2027, 12:04:40 AM	\|
11	\|	Jody.Drummer	\|	Hero Member	\|	-	\|	January 16, 2027, 07:32:34 AM	\|
12	\|		\|		\|		\|		\|

Looks like there will be more...

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 06:51:18 PM

Try again with a VPN or a different browser and see if it works.

Yes, Dex.Fo working now. I was trying for a long time but I couldn't get to the next step, so came to the last step and asked here if anyone is having this problem. I tried using VPN but it still didn't work but later I closed everything on the computer and opened it again and tried without VPN, now it's processing without any problems. Thanks for your quicks response and for your suggestion.

Real quick, separate from everything above — a straight explanation, no spin.

Over the last couple of weeks, replying to a lot of people in a single post led to names getting crossed. A few of you got quoted or thanked for suggestions you never actually made, and a few — Kryptowerk, pooya87, xtraelv — got tagged despite never having posted in this thread at all. Ultegra134 and hosemary flagged the same thing earlier too.

That's on us, not on any of you. It happened because whoever was drafting these batch replies was going through a lot of messages at once and mixed up who said what. Human error — someone moving too fast through a long thread and pairing the wrong name to the wrong point. Not any kind of automated system doing this on its own.

Kryptowerk — understand the reaction completely. Getting tagged out of nowhere by a "No KYC" service, with no context, is a legitimate reason to be suspicious. There's nothing else behind it — no data pull, no targeting, just a mistake in how the replies were put together. Sorry for the confusion.

pooya87, xtraelv — same apology. You didn't say what was attributed to you, that's on us.

Going forward we're dropping the habit of tagging specific names in batch replies — clearly error-prone once there's more than a couple of people to respond to in one post. Replies from here address topics without pinning them to individuals.

Thanks for calling it out plainly. Better to hear it straight than have it fester.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 07:44:51 AM

DEX.fo_off, it's really strange how you keep tagging the wrong users.
You tagged me and responded as if I had suggested adding Arabic language, even though I never made such a suggestion.

You even tagged users who have never posted in this thread.
pooya87, xtraelv and Kryptowerk haven't made a single post in this thread, but they were all tagged by you.

when he started, he was tagging accurately and was responding to every suggestions, it was cool to be honest.

But recently, I discovered I have been tagged twice to posts or suggestions i didn't make. My last post here was in response to Loyce's review and not about FAQs.

DEX.fo, I'll appreciate if you reverse to what you have been doing before now, or simply not respond to everyone that writes in your thread. Reply only when necessary and this will reduce your workload and make you respond naturally.

Quote from: DEX.fo_off on Today at 07:23:10 AM

@Peanutswar

Thanks for wrapping up the previous contest and launching the next one. 🎯 Consistent activity is what keeps the thread alive.

@bitmover

Exactly right — the CEX withdrawal scenario is the one situation where the refund field genuinely matters. Most experienced users like yourself know to fill it in for exactly that case. Making it optional was the right call for the majority, but the safety net stays available for the edge cases where it counts.

@AmnesiaHaze

Thanks for the test report. Quick clarification though — USDT (BEP20) isn't currently on our supported list. Our current USDT support is ERC-20 and TRC-20 only. If your swap went through a bridge or router that converted BEP20 to a supported network on the way in, that would explain the experience — but that's third-party handling, not our native support.

BEP20 support is on the roadmap along with the broader BSC/BNB integration coming after Solana. When it's live, you'll see it directly in the selector.

Could you double-check which network you used? Want to make sure there's no confusion about supported assets.

@GreatArkansas

Sorry to hear about the delay. Please reach out via SimpleX support directly with your Order ID (8f3xzz001) — the support team can look at the specific order and see what's holding it. Public thread isn't the fastest channel for individual case resolution.

If for some reason you can't reach SimpleX support, let us know and we'll help route it. We don't want any user stuck without a resolution.

@hosemary

Both suggestions are solid.

On Arabic — the Middle East interest in crypto (especially UAE and Saudi retail flows) is real and growing, and coverage there would be meaningful. Adding it to the language priority queue.

On the FAQ page needing an update to reflect recent changes and adding a "recent changes" section — 100% agreed, that's on the near-term list. The refund address update alone requires FAQ correction (as noted earlier by another user), and grouping recent changes helps returning users catch up without re-reading everything.

@MarryWithBTC

Compact FAQ in the OP itself — that's the natural next step. This thread has generated more actual useful Q&A content than any FAQ we could write from scratch. Distilling it into a proper OP section is a much better source than starting from zero.

On Portuguese — good addition to the list. Brazilian no-KYC demand is significant and growing, and Portuguese also covers a broader Portuguese-speaking market (Portugal, Angola, Mozambique). Noted alongside Arabic.

@Ultegra134

Thanks — noting the effort on the German translation means a lot. We deliberately went with human translators rather than machine output for exactly the reason you mentioned. Non-native quality shows immediately in a financial interface and undermines trust in a way no cost-saving justifies.

@xtraelv

Welcome to the thread and appreciate the observation. Consistent engagement with the forum after the initial launch is one of the things we specifically decided to prioritize — because you're right, "post, disappear, occasionally reappear" is unfortunately the norm in this space.

On the FAQ — you and others are pointing at the same real problem. New users shouldn't need to trawl through 20 pages to find answers already given. That's on us to consolidate. Working on it.

@Kryptowerk

Fair — SimpleX setup is one of those things that's simple once you know how, but opaque if you're seeing it for the first time. A short "how to reach our support in 3 steps" guide (with the SimpleX link, how to open it, and what to expect) would help new users considerably. Adding to the near-term content list.

@pooya87

That's a clean solution — one contextual warning line handles the CEX edge case without pushing extra friction on users depositing from self-custody. We'll implement that as part of the refund field UI update we're preparing:

"If depositing from a centralized exchange (Binance, Coinbase, etc.), we strongly recommend providing a refund address."

Simple. Direct. Solves the actual problem. Thanks for the practical framing.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

wtf, why are you tagging me? I have a suspicion and it doesn't look good for a "No KYC" exchange. (NO, I never used their service and most likely never will)

Explain yourself, and better without AI written bullshit.
I have my hand on the trigger for negative trust here.
Good luck.

Quote from: cryptofrka on July 19, 2026, 10:26:15 PM

4th-5th - 100$ freebet - hosemary, xGennady
6th-10th - 50$ freebet - mv1986, slaman29, tiCeR, xLays, el che

Fellas, these should be on your accounts. You know the drill - 24h claim window so go claim them ASAP.

BTC prizes will be sent out tonight.

Division 1

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	cryptofrka	13	9	0	4	55	50	5	27
2	Rikafip	13	8	2	3	57	43	14	26
3	hosemary	13	6	5	2	58	48	10	23
4	el che	13	6	4	3	56	48	8	22
5	vd309	13	6	4	3	51	46	5	22
6	ulven	13	6	3	4	58	52	6	21
7	cls63	13	7	0	6	53	50	3	21
8	darxiaomi	13	6	2	5	52	52	0	20
9	jayce	13	6	2	5	45	46	-1	20
10	slaman29	13	6	0	7	52	48	4	18
11	Trofo	13	5	3	5	57	55	2	18
12	ralle14	13	5	3	5	43	48	-5	18
13	strongkored	13	5	2	6	44	47	-3	17
14	Harkorede	13	5	1	7	43	47	-4	16
15	Renato297	13	5	0	8	53	54	-1	15
16	Saint-loup	13	4	3	6	48	51	-3	15
17	mv1986	13	5	0	8	45	43	2	14
18	Slissy	13	0	0	13	0	39	-39	0

Division 2

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	Da_Silva	13	9	1	3	58	43	15	28
2	goodpunt	13	8	1	4	62	48	14	25
3	Jinetics1111	13	8	1	4	53	48	5	25
4	notblox1	13	8	1	4	55	51	4	25
5	Spack17	13	8	0	5	54	51	3	24
6	vivekdkhyani	13	6	3	4	51	44	7	21
7	arallmuus	13	6	2	5	54	48	6	20
8	leea-1334	13	6	1	6	53	57	-4	19
9	Hhampuz	13	6	1	6	55	64	-9	19
10	VashaUdacha777	13	6	0	7	57	48	9	17
11	paco92x	13	5	2	6	57	50	7	17
12	LTU_btc	13	5	2	6	44	43	1	17
13	Igebotz	13	4	2	7	43	48	-5	14
14	Ozymandias_DZ	13	4	2	7	50	58	-8	14
15	Dittoup	13	4	2	7	47	55	-8	14
16	MAAManda	13	4	1	8	51	59	-8	13
17	buwaytress	13	4	1	8	45	58	-13	13
18	B1g4udge	13	4	1	8	40	56	-16	12

Division 3

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	HomieAllDay	13	10	3	0	59	43	16	33
2	chi20	13	9	0	4	55	45	10	27
3	slackovic	13	9	0	4	55	46	9	27
4	LFC_Bitcoin	13	8	2	3	49	31	18	25
5	famososMuertos	13	8	1	4	52	42	10	25
6	imarios	13	7	4	2	56	47	9	25
7	mitchr4	13	6	3	4	45	42	3	20
8	Ochan_yazo_tochant	13	6	1	6	51	49	2	19
9	ILuckyGuyI	13	5	3	5	49	52	-3	17
10	Kokee44	13	5	2	6	46	46	0	16
11	ajanwalker	13	4	2	7	47	55	-8	14
12	Smartvirus	13	4	2	7	42	51	-9	14
13	Koal-84	13	4	1	8	36	40	-4	13
14	hakan2217	13	3	4	6	48	53	-5	13
15	russeras	13	3	4	6	42	48	-6	11
16	un_rank	13	3	1	9	41	50	-9	8
17	cygan	13	1	5	7	40	51	-11	7
18	yassinmanai	13	2	2	9	39	61	-22	6

Division 4

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	welovebit	13	8	1	4	54	48	6	25
2	Heyshbosh	13	7	2	4	59	45	14	23
3	Daniel91	13	7	2	4	52	46	6	23
4	jeremypwr	13	7	1	5	52	46	6	22
5	entebah	13	7	1	5	51	45	6	22
6	pina_pino	13	7	1	5	45	43	2	22
7	General_Bitcoin	13	7	1	5	56	57	-1	22
8	BABY SHOES	13	5	5	3	51	44	7	20
9	Bitcoin Smith	13	6	2	5	52	49	3	20
10	EarnOnVictor	13	6	2	5	54	52	2	20
11	xLays	13	6	1	6	52	49	3	19
12	Nheer	13	6	2	5	49	47	2	19
13	Dump3er	13	6	2	5	47	44	3	18
14	execijutiere	13	5	2	6	43	46	-3	17
15	ovcijisir	13	5	1	7	48	51	-3	16
16	Note3	13	4	2	7	37	43	-6	12
17	Bitcoin_Budha	13	3	2	8	52	60	-8	11
18	knuckey	13	0	0	13	0	39	-39	0

W - Games Won, L - Games Lost, D - Games Drawn
POS - League Position, SD - Score Difference, SF - Score For
SA - Score Against, PLD - Games Played, PTS - Points Earned

Round 13- Results

_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________
Division 1 slaman29 2-3 Harkorede ralle14 1-0 strongkored cryptofrka 4-2 cls63 mv1986 2-4 Rikafip ulven 3-3 vd309 Slissy 0-3 Renato297 Saint-loup 1-2 jayce el che 2-2 Trofo hosemary 3-3 darxiaomi	Division 2 notblox1 4-3 Ozymandias_DZ Spack17 3-1 leea-1334 VashaUdacha777 5-2 Hhampuz Da_Silva 3-2 MAAManda vivekdkhyani 3-3 B1g4udge LTU_btc 4-1 arallmuus Jinetics1111 1-5 paco92x goodpunt 3-0 Igebotz buwaytress 1-4 Dittoup	Division 3 HomieAllDay 3-1 un_rank slackovic 4-2 imarios Smartvirus 1-3 chi20 russeras 1-3 mitchr4 yassinmanai 1-5 LFC_Bitcoin famososMuertos 3-0 ILuckyGuyI hakan2217 2-3 Ochan_yazo_tochant ajanwalker 3-1 Kokee44 cygan 1-2 Koal-84	Division 4 xLays 2-3 pina_pino Bitcoin_Budha 4-2 Nheer Note3 0-3 welovebit BABY SHOES 0-3 ovcijisir Bitcoin Smith 1-3 Heyshbosh Dump3er 5-2 Daniel91 EarnOnVictor 2-4 General_Bitcoin jeremypwr 1-1 execijutiere entebah 3-0 knuckey

[/list]

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

General note - every contest is finishing today so all results are unofficial until tomorrow afternoon.

We have the final results of the Jackpotter’s World Cup 2026 Event Marathon!
It was exciting until the end, Trofo defending his first spot on the tiebreaker.

That means that the rewards are the following:

1st - 4.75 mBTC - Trofo
2nd - 3.25 mBTC - slackovic
3rd - 1.5 mBTC - paco92x
4th-5th - 100$ freebet - hosemary, xGennady
6th-10th - 50$ freebet - mv1986, slaman29, tiCeR, xLays, el che

el che wins the last spot on the tiebreaker ahead of Dump3er and buwaytress.

slackovic, paco92x - your wallets please. Croatian Mafia takes all the rewards here.

Hope you liked the Marathon fellas, and hopefully see you in the next one!

Wow, fellas - let us introduce you to one of the weirdest BSFL rounds of all time. Sports fanatics will have real fun with this one - and some others will scratch their heads in disbelief.
It is what it is - we're scraping the bottom of the barrel now. Still, BSFL marches on Cool

We'll have the Round 13 results ready tonight or tomorrow morning - depending how tired we'll be after the final game.

____________________________________________________________

The questions for Round 14 are here!

The deadline is Tuesday July 21st, 17:00 GMT (forum time).

European qualifiers, badminton, Formula 1, cycling, waterpolo and tennis. Bloody hell Grin

Round 14 - Scheduling

_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________
Division 1 strongkored ^vs slaman29 cls63 ^vs Harkorede Rikafip ^vs ralle14 vd309 ^vs cryptofrka Renato297 ^vs mv1986 jayce ^vs ulven Trofo ^vs Slissy darxiaomi ^vs Saint-loup hosemary ^vs el che	Division 2 leea-1334 ^vs notblox1 Hhampuz ^vs Ozymandias_DZ MAAManda ^vs Spack17 B1g4udge ^vs VashaUdacha777 arallmuus ^vs Da_Silva paco92x ^vs vivekdkhyani Igebotz ^vs LTU_btc Dittoup ^vs Jinetics1111 buwaytress ^vs goodpunt	Division 3 imarios ^vs HomieAllDay chi20 ^vs un_rank mitchr4 ^vs slackovic LFC_Bitcoin ^vs Smartvirus ILuckyGuyI ^vs russeras Ochan_yazo_tochant ^vs yassinmanai Kokee44 ^vs famososMuertos Koal-84 ^vs hakan2217 cygan ^vs ajanwalker	Division 4 Nheer ^vs xLays welovebit ^vs pina_pino ovcijisir ^vs Bitcoin_Budha Heyshbosh ^vs Note3 Daniel91 ^vs BABY SHOES General_Bitcoin ^vs Bitcoin Smith execijutiere ^vs Dump3er knuckey ^vs EarnOnVictor entebah ^vs jeremypwr

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on Today at 01:35:00 PM

I think you would both deserve some sort of booby prize if it’s 0-0. I think it’s as hard to score 0 as it is to score 10 in a round Grin

I think somebody got 10/10 a few years ago though.

Yeah, 0-0 would be the first I think. Seems almost statistically impossible Grin

hosemary had the best 10/10, if I recall almost perfect, because it was also 5/5 in one of the H2H questions and 4/5 in the other one?

__________________________________

Antonelli overtook Leclerc and is just 3 laps away from victory that would be huge both in my title hunt and in LMS. Come on dude, you got this.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 11:36:08 AM

Quote from: examplens on Today at 09:34:49 AM

They may be planned to be added, but until then, there is no need to see them in the interface.

I may be wrong, but I guess that's just a temporary issue.
According to the information provided on their website, they are holding 1703 XMR in reserve and I don't see any reason, other than a temporary issue, why Monero swaps aren't available.

It's a known issue that has been happening for a while now. Last time, the representative said that they are carrying out some maintenance which affects the availability of XMR for swapping in particular at at specific times. I don't know if the specific overnight window applies even right now, but I think this will soon be rectified.

Quote from: DEX.fo_off on July 13, 2026, 12:11:29 PM

Confirming on our side — XMR is currently being fine-tuned and is temporarily unavailable during a specific overnight window, roughly 21:00–07:00 UTC (window is variable, give or take).

This is a temporary phase. Soon XMR will be running 24/7 without interruptions. A bit more patience — we're wrapping up the last adjustments.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 07:27:51 AM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on Today at 06:42:46 AM

I tried to make a test swap from Monero to Bitcoin, but the platform doesn't seem to want to work for me with Tor browser.
After I select the source (you send) to XMR, the target coin related area (you receive) remains forever in a loading mode.

It's not because you were using the TOR browser. I just tried it in another browser and had the same issue as you.
It seems that it's not possible to swap Monero at the moment.

It's also impossible to receive Monero, since it's not listed in the "You receive" menu.

You are not the first to notice this, and the "infinite loading" look seems to be confusing. I assume that a better solution is to disable the selection of pairs that cannot be swapped on this exchange.
They may be planned to be added, but until then, there is no need to see them in the interface.

THE FINALS: 3rd Place & World Cup Final Specials

We have officially reached the final two games of the tournament!
The bookies are pushing out their latest promos for the 3rd place playoff and the Grand Final.
Below are the best active specials you can take advantage of right now.

Epicbet EXCLUSIVE Bitcointalk Community Contest ($300 Pool)
Epicbet has launched a special free-play prediction contest just for forum members based on the official FIFA WC Fantasy points.

Deadline for submission: July 18th 2026, 19:00 UTC (Forum Time)
Link to Official Contest Thread: Join the Epicbet BTT Contest Here

Prize Breakdown (Paid as Epicbet Bonus Balance):
1st place: $120 | 2nd place: $70 | 3rd place: $40 | 4th-5th: $20 | 6th-8th: $10

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS:

Deposit Rule: You must have an active Epicbet account and have made at least one deposit within the last 30 days to claim a prize.
Wager Terms: Any bonus won carries a 6x wagering requirement on selections with minimum odds of 1.60 before you can withdraw.
KYC Notice: Epicbet requires KYC verification. If you do not want to complete KYC, do not enter. If you don't mind, they easily have the best UI and most competitive odds in the business right now.

How to Enter:
Head to the linked thread and reply using the exact template below. DO NOT edit your post after submitting or you will be automatically disqualified.

Code:

Epicbet username: YOUR_USERNAME
1. [Yes/No]
2. [Yes/No]
3. [Yes/No]
4. [Yes/No]
5. [Yes/No]
6. [Yes/No]
7. [Yes/No]
8. [Your Number prediction for highest scoring player]

The 8 Contest Questions:
1. Kane to outscore Dembele in 3rd place play off game? (Yes/No)
2. Mbappe to score 8 points or more in game against England? (Yes/No)
3. Any goalkeeper to get 6 points or more in the 3rd place playoff game? (Yes/No)
4. Bellingham and Mbappe over 12 points combined in 3rd place playoff game? (Yes/No)
5. Messi to be highest scoring player in the final? (Yes/No)
6. Yamal to have an attacking return against Argentina in the final? (Yes/No)
7. Oyarzabal to outscore both Alvarez and Lautaro Martinez (individually, not combined)? (Yes/No)
8. [TIEBREAKER]: How many points will highest scoring player from either of these games have? (Closest answer wins ties. If still tied, earlier post timestamp wins).

Rainbet Finals Specials

1. 100% Boost For Every Goal (Argentina vs Spain)

How it works: Back Argentina to win on the 1x2 market. For every goal Messi scores, you get an extra 100% profit boost (1 goal = 100%, 2 goals = 200%, 3 goals = 300% extra!).
Terms: Issued as a Freebet from your highest betslip, up to $1,000 max. Parlays and live bets are excluded.

2. Get Your Double Profit! (France vs England)

How it works: Place a pre-match bet on any player to score at any time in the France vs England match. If your chosen player scores the first goal of the game, your profit is doubled!
Terms: Valid only for the "Anytime goalscorer" market. Issued as a Freebet up to $1,000. Parlays and live bets are excluded.

3. Get The 100% Lossback!

How it works: Place a regular-time bet on the "Correct Score" market. If the match ends in a 0-0 draw, all losing bets on this market get a full 100% refund.
Terms: Issued as a Freebet from your highest betslip up to $1,000. Valid for the semi-finals and final matches only. Parlays and live bets are excluded.

Promotion Link: Rainbet Sportsbook

Jackpotter - World Cup Final Live Rain & Tips

How it works: Join the On-Site Community Chat during the World Cup 2026 Grand Final match. Stay active to catch regular cash rain triggers and win extra free bets by answering live-timed prediction questions in real-time.
Rain Triggers: Goal Rain, Penalty Rain, 1st Yellow Card, Red Card/VAR chaos, 1st Substitution, Extra Time (7 mins+), Half-Time, Water Breaks, Penalty Shootout, and Full-Time whistle.
Live Tip Challenges: Guess who takes a penalty, guess the exact minute of the 1st goal, and guess if a penalty will be missed.
Requirements: You must deposit a minimum of $10+ during the promotional window to be eligible to claim any chat drops or tip rewards.

Promotion Link: Jackpotter Live Rain & Tips

Epicbet 5,000 USDT On-Site Final Prediction

How it works: Correctly predict the First Goal Scorer AND the Correct Score of the Grand Final before July 19th at 22:00 EEST.
To Qualify: You must place a real money pre-match bet of at least 5 USDT at minimum odds of 2.00 on the tournament, and make sure to manually select the “FWC Final” campaign inside your betslip. Correct entries split the 5,000 USDT pool.

Promotion Link: Epicbet Final Prediction

Stake - Score First, You Win (Upgraded Finals Insurance)

How it works: Place a pre-match single bet on the 1x2 market (90 mins + stoppage time) for the final matches. If your backed team scores the first goal of the match but goes on to draw or lose the game, Stake will still settle your bet as a full winner.
Terms: Maximum qualifying stake is $100 USD. Applies strictly to the first bet placed per match, per household. Extra time and penalty shootouts are completely excluded. Cashed out or voided slips will not qualify. Winnings are processed within 24 hours.

Promotion Link: Stake Score First, You Win

Duelbits Showdown (Matchday 8 Finale - $4,000 Cash Pool)

How to Play: Free to enter. Predict the correct scores for the 3rd Place Playoff and the Grand Final before the first kickoff locks.
Prizes: The top 10 predictors for this final block split a $4,000 cash pool. Points accumulate as: Exact Score (5 pts) | Winner + Team Goals (3 pts) | Basic Outcome (1 pt). Ties split via dead-heat rules.
Requirements: Must be a verified Rookie 1 member and have deposited a minimum of $20 during this Matchday period to claim prizes. Scores count for 90 mins of standard play only.

Promotion Link: Duelbits World Cup Showdown

FortuneJack - Every Goal Minute Pays (Spain vs Argentina)

How it works: Place a single or combo bet of $50+ on the 1X2 market for the Spain vs Argentina Grand Final.
Prizes: The exact match minutes your backed team scores become your Freebet currency value (Goal Minute = $ Freebet value).
Example: If your team scores in the 35th and 62nd minutes, you get a $97 Freebet ($35 + $62). If your team fails to score a single goal, you still walk away with a guaranteed $20 safety Freebet. Max total payout is capped at $100.

Promotion Link: FortuneJack Finals Special

Which way are your final predictions leaning? Make your bets and let's cash out big on the final weekend!

Monitored Platforms for Promotions
These are the platforms I am actively tracking daily for official World Cup campaigns and bonuses:

Code:

1win - 2UP.io - ACEBET - BC.GAME - bet25.com - Betcoin.AG - BetFury.com - BetHog - Betpanda.io - Bets.io - Bitz.io - BK8.io - Chips.gg - Cloudbet - CoinRoyale - DoSi - DuckDice.io - duelbits - Dustbit - EarnBet.io - Epicbet - FortuneJack - Jackpotter - JacksClub - Lucky.fun - MetaWin - Owl.games - Polymarket - Punkz - Rainbet - Razed - Rollbit - Roobet - Shuffle - sportsbet.io - Stake - SunFire.bet - Vave - Whale - wild.io - Winna - WolfBet

Bookmaker Representatives & Forum Managers
The following community handles and official promotional accounts represent our monitored betting platforms. Feel free to share your campaign updates directly here:

Code:

@Whale - AB de Royse777 - alexchenn - bennettwinna - Bets.io_Nikita - BK8.Official - contesthunters.com - CR_Anders - Dustbit Official - EOSBet - EpicCharles - God Of Thunder - Hhampuz - icopress - inspace - JackpotterCasino - jeremypwr - julerz12 - Little Mouse - memehunter - MetaWin_Official - N1N4A - owlgames - paco92x - Rollbitcom - shanz - Stunna - SunFire Casino - waltrazed - wildcasino - xandry

Active Sports Bettors & Contest Participants
The following community members have an established history of participating in sports prediction contests, leaderboard pools or actively engaging with tournament betting threads:

Code:

1grindwhale - Agbamoni - ajiz138 - Altryist - arallmuus - avp2306 - B1g4udge - BABY SHOES - barcode - Betwrong - Bitbollo - Bitcoin Smith - Bitcoin_Budha - BitcoinGirl.Club - BitcoinHunt3r - brooksby - bullrun2024bro - buwaytress - Charaf_chenina - Charles-Tim - chi20 - CLS63 - CryptoBuds - cryptofrka - CryptopreneurBrainboss - crwth - Da_Silva - Danydee - darxiaomi - Distraction - Dittoup - Dump3er - EarnOnVictor - eisen33 - entebah - execijutiere - famososMuertos - fruy8 - General_Bitcoin - goodpunt - hahay - Harkorede - Heyshbosh - hilariousandco - holydarkness - HomieAllDay - hosemary - ILuckyGuyI - imarios - Jayce - Jinetics1111 - Joca97 - joker_josue - JollyGood - kanapka - klarki - knuckey - koal-84 - kokee44 - KTChampions - Learn Bitcoin - leea-1334 - LFC_Bitcoin - logfiles - lolojones - M1cha3lM - MAAManda - Mahdirakib - mitchr4 - mole0815 - morvillz7z - mv1986 - NavidArt - NeuroticFish - NotATether - notblox1 - Note3 - Obim34 - Omikifuse - ovcijisir - Ozymandias_DZ - Patrick6549 - pina_pino - Pmalek - Porfirii - Pulsar77 - ralle14 - rdbase - Renato297 - Rikafip - rohang - Rruchi man - russeras - Saint-loup - SATWAT - seek3r - shogun47 - skevica22 - slackovic - slaman29 - Slissy - Smartvirus - snipie - Spack17 - Strongkored - swogerino - Text - tiCeR - tokeweed - Trofo - Ulven - un_rank - VashaUdacha777 - vivekdhyani1 - welovebit - Woodie - yassinmanai02 - Z-tight - Zwei

Update:
DT 1
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (61) 14654 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 203: HostFat (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 311 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (15) 10005 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 5478 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 51173: mprep (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 11183 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 65636: babo (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4721 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 2874 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (25) 3595 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2774 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 85033: d5000 (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 9867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6756 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 8849 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2089 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 123824: albon (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 6259 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2557 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 140584: EFS (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2165 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 164749: stompix (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (13) 6651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 1933 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 170072: arulbero (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1547 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 195 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2377 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 13723 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6266 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (24) 3745 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +21 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 10245 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 744 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +39 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4418 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3956 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11365 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11978 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4532 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 2836 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (1) 4598 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (66) 21249 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. 487418: The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (33) 6361 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 3111 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +12 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (12) 10130 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1394 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 4117 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. 830967: tweetious (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 454 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2017 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3858 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1359 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3594 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6800 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. 1000199: krogothmanhattan (Trust: +88 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 4208 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1961 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2309 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 4617 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. 1067333: El duderino_ (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (13) 15601 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2302 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. 1099980: Trofo (Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3576 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +87 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (38) 12908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. 1190631: JeromeTash (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1464 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2348 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 9931 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. 1311641: tvplus006 (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2625 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7615 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
65. 1582324: DdmrDdmr (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 11371 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
66. 1634314: shahzadafzal (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 3382 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
67. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4215 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
68. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2201 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
69. 1827294: Husna QA (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3442 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
70. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 20973 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
71. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2938 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
72. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2564 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
73. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 2597 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
74. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (30) 5719 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
75. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 5747 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
76. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1605 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
77. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +49 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3738 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
78. 2363935: YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1898 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
79. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1524 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
80. 2497429: jokers10 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4133 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
81. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 848 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
82. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
83. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
84. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (26) 8150 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
85. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1884 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
86. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 9862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
87. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1594 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
88. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5346 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
89. 2775483: BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 9934 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
90. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6440 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
91. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1287 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
92. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 3560 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
93. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 650 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
94. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7207 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
95. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1010 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (8773 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 2252: laanwj (Trust: neutral) (50 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 3380: Vladimir (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 4171: Raize (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 6347: Maged (Trust: neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 10354: JJG (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 10502: SgtSpike (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 11275: wariner (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 11671: Kluge (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 12089: piotr_n (Trust: neutral) (467 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 12459: CydeWeys (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 13813: smooth (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 14001: MiningBuddy (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: MarryWithBTC on July 17, 2026, 10:20:11 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on July 17, 2026, 08:48:50 PM

edit the amount in the "YOU RECEIVE" field: I type how much of a certain coin I need, and the site should tell me how much to send.

I was wowed by this suggestion. I don't think any service has done it this way before.

It's how every ATM in every country works: you enter the amount you want in the local currency.

Quote

explaining to users that the "YOU RECEIVE" field is actually editable could be the problem.

If someone wants to use this feature, they'll just try. It's not that hard to explain.

Quote

Someone visiting the exploit forum to claim escrow will consider the $200 lost because after receiving the escrow

If you don't know the site, it feels a lot like a recovery scam.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 04:15:01 AM

Unless I misunderstood you, "BTC" and "ETH" are reversed in the sentence you wrote inside the parentheses.

Thanks, I fixed it.

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 06:30:10 AM

Quote from: buwaytress on July 16, 2026, 09:11:04 PM

Have you not learnt enough about Trofo to know what's involved? But good job Trofo man, raking in from Jackpotter on Marathon and Rainbet from Beat the Bookie. Pretty decent turnout from slackovic, paco and hosemary too. Impressed.

World Cup has been kind to many of us, and I can't complain either, it's been fun and in general, losses have been offset by modest wins in events like this.

Actually, one win and two 2nd places in events I got in this competition made me like it even more than the BSFL. With three event wins and one second-place finish, Trofo has already accumulated as much in prizes (counting only BTC) as he will receive if he wins the competition (paco92x, we're rooting for you Grin

).

On the other hand, if I was in cryptofrka's shoes, I would probably want to forget the competition as soon as possible Grin

Thank you guys for the support. I will definitely do everything in my power to not let the Mafia boys win first place. And it is not about the money, it is about the bragging that will follow if he manages to win it. cryptofrka, did you let Trofo win this one? Grin

They definitely have some arrangement between them Grin

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 07:19:58 AM

I may be missing something, but I don't really understand why you posted this topic.

I created this topic to warn everyone that this member currently has an active loan with shasan.
If he tries to take any loan from you outside the forum, I suggest you don't lend him anything.
We have seen many cases recently where people take loan on the forum, then secretly ask for more via telegram or inbox, and then disappear.

vivekdhyani1 - this guy was in good campaign and two weeks ago Hhampuz removed him from campaign. I haven't noticed any activity from him on the forum since then.

Quote from: buwaytress on July 16, 2026, 09:11:04 PM

Actually, the two wins I got in this competition made me like it even more than the BSFL. With three event wins and one second-place finish, Trofo has already accumulated as much in prizes (counting only BTC) as he will receive if he wins the competition (paco92x, we're rooting for you Grin

).

On the other hand, if I was in cryptofrka's shoes, I would probably want to forget the competition as soon as possible Grin

Quote from: slackovic on Today at 02:09:07 PM

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 02:01:38 PM

Only paco92x can take first place away from Trofo.
Neither you nor I can finish the Marathon above Trofo. Either of us who wins the first place in the last event will have the same leaderboard points as Trofo, but will lose the tie-breaker to him.

Oh, right... I forgot to check out the tie-breakers. Well, what can I say. I'm not sure if Trofo is just lucky or there is some knowledge involved. It's probably combination of both, but good work!

Quote from: SeriouslyGiveaway on Today at 04:08:38 PM

Quote from: hosemary on July 15, 2026, 10:29:46 PM

This link shows your IP logs only for the past 30 days, not 6 months.
According to Forum's "About privacy" page (which you yourself shared), users' IP logs are kept for a longer period, but only admins can see them.

I explained it to OP too.

Quote from: SeriouslyGiveaway on July 15, 2026, 03:49:30 PM

You can get your account IP only up to 6 months that is impossible now because your account was last active in 2023, about 3 years ago.
https://bitcointalk.org/myips.php

With normal retention, your city geolocations will be recorded for 6 years and admin can provide you that information. You can not have that information now but admin has it, and it can be part of information you need to prove for your account recovery.

I told him that if he can prove his identity, only from Bitcoin signed message, admin can check it like city geolocations as part of his account recovery. Likely it is for important accounts like VIP and donator accounts but it is still a possibility.

I am ready to donate to get back my account + the only proof i have is an email that is on an old post of me it prouves that it is my identity.

Where to find admins ? I have to email i guess ...no reply until now!

Quote from: hosemary on July 15, 2026, 10:29:46 PM

I explained it to OP too.

Quote from: SeriouslyGiveaway on July 15, 2026, 03:49:30 PM

Weekly update (2026-07-10_Fri_05.18h)

theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)
Sample

Code:

1783651823 2 4657305.msg66925025 1724800 1041310
1783651420 1 5583520.msg66924272 1237156 7811
1783650362 1 5587999.msg66925364 3570710 1045971
1783649438 1 5579256.msg66925155 3752555 1190631
1783648143 1 178336.msg66923967 252510 198573
1783648035 1 178336.msg66923919 252510 1634314
1783647622 1 178336.msg66923656 252510 533583
1783647479 1 5587136.msg66923796 1269701 221727
1783647466 1 178336.msg66923627 252510 33156
1783647378 1 178336.msg66923399 252510 963784
1783646594 1 5587805.msg66921623 995810 3434176
1783646583 1 5587805.msg66921475 995810 2004043
1783646462 1 178336.msg66923177 252510 64507
1783646346 1 178336.msg66923148 252510 33156
1783646305 1 178336.msg66922880 252510 2755547
1783646154 1 178336.msg66922707 252510 2755547
1783645783 1 178336.msg66922590 252510 1634314
1783644676 1 5376945.msg66925568 252510 3724979
1783644195 1 5587709.msg66918765 1593137 753396
1783642731 1 5445282.msg66924550 1554927 97582
1783642227 1 5587703.msg66925507 3442536 137185
1783642040 1 5376945.msg66924564 252510 3752453
1783641608 1 5376945.msg66924386 252510 3367218
1783641526 1 5376945.msg66924171 252510 3525056
1783641131 1 5376945.msg66924068 252510 3670744
1783641085 1 5376945.msg66924040 252510 3733747
1783641043 1 5376945.msg66923992 252510 3570979
1783640441 1 5451044.msg66905679 1827294 392207
1783639302 1 5376945.msg66923590 252510 3614991
1783638645 1 5376945.msg66923542 252510 3508007
1783638386 1 5549699.msg66330731 3559419 3607450
1783638327 1 5587824.msg66918353 3559419 3534730
1783637475 2 5587999.msg66924985 1045971 3663803
1783637353 1 5479271.msg66925250 3528115 2015418
1783637342 1 5479271.msg66925092 3528115 1593137
1783636885 1 5587786.msg66924407 97582 1031572
1783636367 1 5538211.msg66922496 941526 112493
1783636280 2 5587991.msg66924881 184231 317618
1783636240 2 5587991.msg66924902 184231 163641
1783636079 1 5376945.msg66923381 252510 3732496
1783635719 1 232519.msg66924601 2872248 3594134
1783635680 3 5587864.msg66919604 407174 3761530
1783635123 5 5544695.msg65425359 113670 3082389
1783635115 1 5544695.msg66522282 113670 857604
1783635061 1 5544695.msg66923645 113670 857604
1783634986 1 5587575.msg66913976 407174 1365271
1783633131 1 5587312.msg66924662 3639584 149135
1783632882 2 5451159.msg66922957 407174 2654005
1783632697 1 4850385.msg66914397 407174 2843153
1783632363 3 5587954.msg66922802 407174 366632
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396

Full list^* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2319 Merit transactions added since my previous update).

theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)
Sample
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:50:23 AM CEST, Lakai01 (history) sent 2 Merit to Unknown01 (history) for Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... .
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:43:40 AM CEST, nc50lc (history) sent 1 Merit to goatpig (history) for Re: 0.97 RC1.
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:26:02 AM CEST, promise444c5 (history) sent 1 Merit to igehhh (history) for Re: OKX is back in Nigeria .
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 04:10:38 AM CEST, KycNotList (history) sent 1 Merit to JeromeTash (history) for Re: 🔎 [ANN] KycNotList.com — No KYC / No AML Crypto Exchange Monitor.
On Fri 10 Jul 2026 03:49:03 AM CEST, JayJuanGee (history) sent 1 Merit to Hueristic (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET, AdolfinWolf (history) sent 1 Merit to Lutpin (history) for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET, Dahman El_Harrachi (history) sent 1 Merit to theymos (history) for Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET, Tyrantt (history) sent 5 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET, Last of the V8s (history) sent 2 Merit to Rosewater Foundation (history) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET, theymos (history) sent 1 Merit to AdolfinWolf (history) for What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (602 MB)

Usernames to go with theymos' data
Sample
0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (history) earned: 0 Merit.
3: satoshi (history) earned: 8773 Merit.
4: sirius (history) earned: 935 Merit.
10: Xunie (history) earned: 1 Merit.
11: madhatter (history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3761538: Benedesuuuk (history) earned: 9 Merit.
3761676: Lytvynets1 (history) earned: 2 Merit.
3761774: scoorched (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner) (history) earned: 1 Merit.
3761992: Diceftw (history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list^* (10 MB)

Usernames machine readable
Sample

Code:

0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3758666: ChrisOfTheOT
3758716: abdulcelildibo
3758816: WurstTrader
3758829: options4good
3758929: SubGenius.Finance
3758969: Ghostswap.io
3759033: Fash33
3759071: standardnepo
3759079: Parveziqbal123
3759272: WhatareYou
3759370: ArkonSwap
3759379: Crypto gbeegbe
3759389: Antidote47k
3759454: Nwaswago
3759482: Ribust
3759517: satsinesat
3759555: DroidDesk
3759560: hellowaza
3759674: VarJames
3759725: godisreal
3759766: KingVesting
3759808: Kannibal Hektor
3760211: 0xHashRaptor
3760228: lll555
3760243: proofra
3760275: Neha2399
3760276: DragonBites
3760305: redtrusts
3760506: smf24
3760625: gijane
3760686: legendo
3760707: aodrbxo
3760791: swedoc
3760817: lastpixellive
3760902: borrowonbitcoin
3760961: Ethereum1
3761001: buffetto
3761071: Droppies
3761141: paidfully
3761153: mickpaoli
3761170: Soulistic
3761237: IsItMiCACompliant
3761238: xmrbro
3761348: Gmax98005
3761530: Priamex.com
3761538: Benedesuuuk
3761676: Lytvynets1
3761774: scoorched
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw

Full list (2 MB)

UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readable
Sample

Code:

0:569:0
3:0:8773
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:1
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14428:14654
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1491
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3758666:0:1
3758716:0:1
3758816:0:1
3758829:0:1
3758929:0:1
3758969:1:3
3759033:0:3
3759071:3:7
3759079:0:1
3759272:0:2
3759370:0:1
3759379:0:1
3759389:0:9
3759454:0:1
3759482:4:19
3759517:0:2
3759555:0:1
3759560:0:2
3759674:0:3
3759725:0:1
3759766:0:4
3759808:9:37
3760211:0:4
3760228:0:1
3760243:0:5
3760275:0:2
3760276:0:2
3760305:0:3
3760506:0:1
3760625:0:1
3760686:0:2
3760707:0:3
3760791:0:1
3760817:0:5
3760902:0:3
3760961:0:2
3761001:0:2
3761071:0:1
3761141:0:1
3761153:0:1
3761170:1:4
3761237:0:3
3761238:0:4
3761348:0:1
3761530:0:4
3761538:0:9
3761676:0:2
3761774:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1

Full list (1 MB)

Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51574
Sample

Code:

1. 21249 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1116 unique users in 12300 transactions
2. 20973 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 764 unique users in 11486 transactions
3. 18897 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9988 transactions
4. 15601 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8956 transactions
5. 14654 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1225 unique users in 5304 transactions
6. 13723 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 731 unique users in 9043 transactions
7. 12908 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 604 unique users in 4843 transactions
8. 11978 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 500 unique users in 6598 transactions
9. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
10. 11789 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 527 unique users in 6068 transactions
11. 11371 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6470 transactions
12. 11365 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 611 unique users in 6611 transactions
13. 11183 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 587 unique users in 6438 transactions
14. 10376 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5308 transactions
15. 10245 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 659 unique users in 5548 transactions
16. 10130 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 558 unique users in 4520 transactions
17. 10005 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 341 unique users in 3675 transactions
18. 9934 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 469 unique users in 4972 transactions
19. 9931 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 402 unique users in 3457 transactions
20. 9867 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 453 unique users in 5393 transactions
21. 9862 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 534 unique users in 4544 transactions
22. 9186 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 4966 transactions
23. 8898 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 410 unique users in 4587 transactions
24. 8849 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 584 unique users in 5235 transactions
25. 8773 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 411 unique users in 930 transactions
26. 8755 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 456 unique users in 5188 transactions
27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
28. 8150 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 460 unique users in 4467 transactions
29. 7615 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 592 unique users in 4514 transactions
30. 7613 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4137 transactions
31. 7238 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4170 transactions
32. 7207 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 234 unique users in 1853 transactions
33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
34. 6885 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3488 transactions
35. 6881 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 229 unique users in 3939 transactions
36. 6800 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 398 unique users in 3736 transactions
37. 6756 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 345 unique users in 3167 transactions
38. 6755 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3037 transactions
39. 6723 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 955 unique users in 4373 transactions
40. 6651 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 487 unique users in 3694 transactions
41. 6590 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 529 unique users in 3811 transactions
42. 6451 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 429 unique users in 3529 transactions
43. 6440 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 435 unique users in 3762 transactions
44. 6425 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 206 unique users in 3716 transactions
45. 6361 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 625 unique users in 3580 transactions
46. 6266 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 461 unique users in 3490 transactions
47. 6259 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 221 unique users in 3640 transactions
48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
49. 5747 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2723 transactions
50. 5719 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 458 unique users in 4018 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51525. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51526. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51527. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51528. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51529. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51530. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51531. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51532. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51533. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51534. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51535. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51536. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51537. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51538. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51539. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51540. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51541. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51542. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51543. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51544. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51545. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51546. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51547. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51548. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51549. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51550. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51551. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51552. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51553. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51554. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51555. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51556. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51557. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51558. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51559. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51560. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51561. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51562. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51563. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51564. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51565. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51566. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51567. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51568. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51569. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51570. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51571. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51572. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51573. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51574. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

Full list (5 MB)

Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26704
Sample

Code:

1. 76324 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 909 unique users in 13018 transactions
2. 71451 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2294 unique users in 31288 transactions
3. 68773 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3345 unique users in 18007 transactions
4. 61962 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3648 unique users in 59726 transactions
5. 60127 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4722 unique users in 34432 transactions
6. 53377 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3768 unique users in 36778 transactions
7. 45232 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2918 unique users in 16014 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 38792 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2540 unique users in 14447 transactions
10. 38321 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2964 unique users in 31046 transactions
11. 35648 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1597 unique users in 14164 transactions
12. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
13. 33037 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2192 unique users in 11324 transactions
14. 32774 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1490 unique users in 10447 transactions
15. 29777 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1460 unique users in 7781 transactions
16. 29202 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1729 unique users in 6836 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
20. 23224 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1382 unique users in 9530 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18027 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1770 unique users in 4070 transactions
23. 16955 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 568 unique users in 7967 transactions
24. 16781 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 753 unique users in 6231 transactions
25. 16515 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1748 unique users in 7569 transactions
26. 16274 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1201 unique users in 9324 transactions
27. 16240 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2004 unique users in 6602 transactions
28. 15275 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 642 unique users in 5489 transactions
29. 15056 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1331 unique users in 8470 transactions
30. 14561 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1689 unique users in 7614 transactions
31. 14428 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1107 unique users in 1766 transactions
32. 14365 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3162 unique users in 7556 transactions
33. 13571 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 663 unique users in 3635 transactions
34. 13421 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1151 unique users in 8206 transactions
35. 13393 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5907 transactions
36. 13372 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1354 unique users in 7420 transactions
37. 13366 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6273 transactions
38. 13204 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 848 unique users in 4295 transactions
39. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
40. 11888 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1193 unique users in 6509 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
43. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
44. 8606 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 585 unique users in 7331 transactions
45. 8547 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1063 unique users in 3708 transactions
46. 8532 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 757 unique users in 7392 transactions
47. 8368 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 332 unique users in 3370 transactions
48. 8364 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 522 unique users in 6616 transactions
49. 8204 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 958 unique users in 3580 transactions
50. 7953 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 667 unique users in 2476 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26655. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26656. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26657. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26658. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26659. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26660. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26661. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26662. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26663. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26664. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26665. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26666. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26667. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26668. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26669. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26670. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26671. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26672. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26673. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26674. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26675. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26676. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26677. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26678. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26679. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26680. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26681. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26682. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26683. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26684. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26685. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26686. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26687. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26688. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26689. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26690. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26691. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26692. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26693. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26694. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26695. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26696. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26697. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26698. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26699. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26700. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26701. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26702. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26703. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions

Full list (3 MB)

Merit per day of the week
Monday 338473 (14.38%)
Tuesday 338172 (14.36%)
Wednesday 337826 (14.35%)
Thursday 358516 (15.23%)
Friday 355997 (15.12%)
Saturday 310214 (13.18%)
Sunday 314372 (13.35%)
Total: 2353570

^* This file will be overwritten by newer versions

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 02:01:38 PM

Oh, right... I forgot to check out the tie-breakers. Well, what can I say. I'm not sure if Trofo is just lucky or there is some knowledge involved. It's probably combination of both, but good work!

Quote from: paco92x on Today at 01:01:08 PM

The last event is here. I'm still in a superb second position, but I could fall really hard if I don't manage to win the ticket and bad luck strikes. All in all, it's been a superb event from the start. I hope we'll see a similar kind of competition in the months ahead.

I'm patiently waiting for you to slip up to climb up to the 2nd place. I don't think that anyone can beat Trofo. The only way for him to lose his 1st place is that he doesn't get any points, while hosemary, you or me wins the Event 15.

@Ultegra134

You captured the actual issue perfectly — the first automated acknowledgment ("we got your message, working on it") does more for user experience than a fast final answer with no interim response. Silence during waiting is what generates panic, not the wait itself. We're looking at automating that first-touch acknowledgment so it lands consistently regardless of team load. Thanks for continuing to push on this.

Also — appreciate the second review below. Chain mode running smoothly under load is exactly what we design for. Fast mode availability for USDT-BTC depends on reserves in the moment; when Fast is back consistently across all pairs, that limitation goes away. Working on it.

@hosemary

On the on-chain proof-of-reserves — you're right, at our scale it's genuinely hard to implement cleanly. The moment we publish a set of addresses claiming "this is our reserves," we've published targeting information plus the aforementioned honeypot risk. Services that do full on-chain proof-of-reserves usually either aggregate into fewer wallets (concentrating risk) or use zero-knowledge proofs (which are technically expensive to set up and verify). Both are on the horizon for our roadmap but not something we can flip on this quarter.

The trade-off in the meantime — forum escrow + PGP-signed guarantees from independent parties + operational track record over time. Not perfect, but a reasonable stack.

@MarryWithBTC

Fair take across the board. The prize scaling from $30 to $50 to $100 mirrors the thread's activity growth honestly — more engagement, better contests. Credit to Peanutswar for driving that consistently.

On the escrow suggestion — Trévoid's response below covers the practical side. Their escrow is a limited-capacity arrangement they extend selectively, not a service they scale up. That's actually a feature, not a bug: if they took on every request, the guarantee would mean less. We're grateful they extended it to us; adding more services would dilute what makes their word carry weight.

@bitmover

Well-summarized on the Exploit escrow dynamic — it's basically the forum administration acting as a trusted third party specifically because their reputation is worth far more than the escrow itself. Skin in the game at multiple layers.

On PGP-signed statements as a general reputation feature on sites — noted. Something we can look at implementing on our /reputation page: rotating PGP-signed status updates that any user can verify with our public key. Would make ongoing status claims (like "site status normal," "no outstanding disputes," etc.) independently verifiable rather than just published text.

@hosemary (post 361)

Both points are constructive and both are on our list. The OP does need refreshing — the asset list is outdated (still shows DAI which we removed), and there's no compact summary of the discussion topics that keep repeating. We'll batch these updates:

— Updated coin list: BTC, ETH, XMR, LTC, USDT, USDC
— Escrow summary (1 BTC on Exploit.in + 6.2 XMR via Trévoid)
— PGP infrastructure (support signing + per-order signing)
— Refund address explanation with the "same coin you send FROM" framing
— Chain vs Fast mode mechanics
— Coming soon: Solana, BSC/BNB
— FAQ links for the most-repeated questions

The idea is exactly what you said — new users read the OP first and if it's comprehensive, they don't need to trawl 20+ pages to find answers already given. Should reduce the repetitive questions and let the thread focus on actual new discussion.

@MarryWithBTC (post 362)

"Set reminder, don't miss unless the operator says no" 😅 — sound approach.

@Trévoid

Fully understand the position. Extending guarantees is a limited resource that only carries weight because it's used carefully. We appreciate the trust you extended to us — and respect the boundary you keep for it. Both matter.

@dwyane36

Understood on the exotic/underserved pair interest. RUNE-BTC and similar emerging Layer 1 pairs are interesting from a demand standpoint, but the liquidity constraints on smaller L1 assets make them tricky to route reliably in Chain mode without wide spreads. We evaluate them individually as their liquidity ecosystem matures.

The general logic — we'll add pairs when we can offer them cleanly (reasonable spread, reliable settlement, no dead-ends on refund). Not just when they're asked for. Better to say "not yet" than to add a pair that quietly fails 30% of the time.

@AnybodyElse

Thanks for the swap report and the honest $150 first test — 27 minutes on Chain mode USDT (ERC-20) → BTC is a solid result. Glad the experience landed well.

On Fast mode for USDT → BTC specifically — it comes and goes depending on our BTC reserves at that specific moment. When Fast is available for that pair, the swap is instant post-confirmation. Right now Fast is in a broader rework to make it consistent across pairs — when that lands, "sometimes available, sometimes not" won't be the answer anymore.

@Ultegra134 (post 366)

Fair on the status messaging inside the UI during longer swaps — this ties directly to the point in your earlier post. A "currently routing through liquidity pool, expected 15-20 min remaining" indicator (or similar) during longer flows would help users understand what's happening instead of just watching a spinner. Adding to the UX list along with the refund field improvements.

Thanks again for the multi-angle feedback — you're pointing at real friction, not hypothetical.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Quote from: cryptofrka on Today at 08:26:37 AM

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 07:11:30 AM

I just tried it and was able to place a swap order and see the deposit address without any issues. It seems that something is preventing the page from loading properly for you. Did you try visiting the website with a VPN or a different browser?
The very large value displayed as "ordered amount" in your screenshot also looks weird. In my order, that field shows both the amount and the currency.

Yeah, managed to do it now. Not sure what was the case but it was happening to me on multiple occasions in a span of 1-2 hours.

I did the needed swap from a different PC/browser now so will retry the one that caused me issues later when I get home. The important thing is that it works Grin

It seems to me that the problem is with the ordered amount, which is unrealistic for any currency.
Maybe it can be considered as a bug because the system does not show the error and the reason why it happened, so it looks stuck

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 07:11:30 AM

Quote from: xLays on July 15, 2026, 10:18:13 PM

I don't know what the final round will be like, but I'm hoping there will be a way for those who are behind on the leaderboard to still have a chance to comeback. For example, a perfect prediction could double or even triple your points for the current round (leaderboard points only for Event 15). Something like that would make it much more exciting and encourage everyone to keep participating until the final round.

It is a bit stupid when I say from the top of the leaderboard but something like that is not fair to those on top of the leaderboard. If we thought about it before we started and had it in the rules....Then it would be another thing. We could have gone with some kind of koeficient which rises as tournament progress but then you would have a problem of people missing earlier events if your logic for everyone playing holds water. I don't think it matters at all since individual event rewards are high enough on its own. No way I would skip event 15 even if nobody could catch me on leaderboard.

With that, new event is out, GL guys and let's end this on a bang Grin

🏆⚽🏆Event #15 of Jackpotter’s World Cup 2026 Event Marathon🏆⚽🏆

Code:

arallmuus
Audrey Simmons
B1g4udge
BABY SHOES
buwaytress
cryptofrka
darxiaomi
doggywin
Dump3er
EarnOnVictor
el che
Etiquette.exe
goodpunt
Harkorede
hosemary
igebotz
igoremr
leea-1334
LFC_Bitcoin
Mahdirakib
mitchr4
mv1986
notblox1
Ozymandias_DZ
paco92x
ralle14
russeras
slackovic
slaman29
Teethow
tiCeR
Trofo
vivekdhyani1
vladu89
Woodie
xaspero
xGennady
xLays

It's really late and there were a lot of betslips with corners, cards etc, so the winners will be confirmed tomorrow after another round of checks.

However, barring some big mistakes, here are the winners of Event 14:

1st - 1.25 mBTC + 5 leaderboard points - slaman29
2nd - 0.75 mBTC + 4 leaderboard points - darbitmobilerecovery - points added to darxiaomi
3rd - 50$ freebet + 3 leaderboard points - hosemary
4th - 30$ freebet + 2 leaderboard points - Teethow
5th - 20$ freebet + 1 leaderboard point - leea-1334

slaman29, darbitmobilerecovery - please send us your BTC wallets.

We'll let you know once the rewards are sent/credited.

@hosemary

Thanks for the continued engagement — pushing us toward better verification standards is exactly what benefits the whole community, not just this thread.

On the on-chain address question — TryNinja explained it correctly below 👇. The escrow at Exploit.in isn't a smart contract with an isolated address; it's a deposit into the forum's operational wallet as part of their vendor registration. That wallet handles many transactions daily from services and advertisers, so pointing to a single address wouldn't cleanly identify our 1 BTC specifically. The escrow itself is tracked by the forum administration internally, not on-chain.

We understand this is less transparent than a public smart-contract escrow would be — that's a trade-off of using a forum-administered arrangement. What it does provide instead is dispute resolution through a real human authority with skin in the game (the forum's reputation is worth far more than 1 BTC).

For fully on-chain verifiable proof-of-reserves in the future, that's on the roadmap. Not something we can retrofit onto the Exploit escrow, but worth building separately.

@Peanutswar

Thanks for wrapping up the previous contest and launching a fresh one. 🎯 Consistent prediction contests are exactly what keeps this thread lively and engaged. Congrats to Trévoid on the win — good week for them across multiple angles apparently.

@MarryWithBTC

Ha, "booked the guess and then forgot" — classic. The alarm-while-driving pattern earlier in this thread is basically the same category. Some things you can't automate around.

And you're right about Trévoid's position — running their own no-KYC exchange gives them a real market read that a passive predictor doesn't have. Fair play winning it. Also fair that this pattern of overlapping trust arrangements between reputable services strengthens the whole niche — when established players vouch for each other with actual capital on the line, that's a stronger signal than any marketing claim.

@TryNinja

Thanks again for the clarification on how the Exploit escrow works structurally. You explained it more clearly than we would have — and that matters when the question is coming from a Legendary user with 7k+ merits who's genuinely trying to understand the mechanism.

Also correct on the assumption: user funds aren't at risk from the forum's operational wallet activity. The escrow is an internal accounting commitment on the forum's side, not a locked contract address. If anything went wrong with the operational wallet, the escrow claim would still be valid — that's the point of holding it through an administered process rather than a self-executing contract. Two different trust models, each with strengths and weaknesses.

DEX.fo — No KYC. No AML. No registration.

Quote from: hosemary on July 14, 2026, 11:43:02 PM

Quote from: DEX.fo_off on July 14, 2026, 08:44:58 AM

On the /reputation page — we've checked it from our side and it's working normally, with or without VPN. The page loads and displays all the reputation info as intended. Please try again — could be a temporary caching or DNS hiccup on your end.

I can see all the information shared on the reputation page without any issues. Every page on your website has been accessible every single time I tried to visit it.
The issue I reported earlier was with Exploit.in, not with your website.

Yes, that's true, all parts of the website are available, however, not all parts of the website are finished yet.
The API page and the Affiliation Program are still under construction.
Of course, the most important pages, such as the transaction page, contact page, QA, System status, etc. are active and operational and that's what matters most to users, but I, for one, would be interested in learning more about that Affiliation Program.
I assume that's still in the preparation phase.