Last update: 2026-08-26_Wed_12.42h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
hosemary receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. hosemary
Posts in these topics are ignored:
none
Username "hosemary" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 67082738 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Wed Aug 26 12:40:08 CEST 2026) in Import Private Keys: why is this feature so misused in wallets that support it?:
You don't have to calculate the change amount manually.
Just fill the "Pay to many" field in this way:
Address A, 0.1
Address B, 0.2
Address C, !
This sends 0.1 BTC to address A, 0.2 BTC to address B, and the remaining amount to address C.
Thanks for clarifying this for me, however, as I said, using pay to many just to manually specify the change output is a workaround. I would prefer a built-in feature specifically designed to handle the change amount.
Something like the "advanced wallet" proposed by SomberNight struck me as a great idea.
I would not consider this a workaround. This is a basic wallet feature, which people use everyday.
It is the native way of the wallet to solve the problem you mentioned, the address reuse in case of change.
The wallet doesn't force you to reuse the address, even when you import a private key.
I think one important thing to remember is that the change address is not a random address in your receiving addresses. Change addresses have a different derivation path in HD wallets
I made a small research in their github and found a discussion about this, and they said in the end that only advanced users would import private keys
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/5353 (Imported wallets send change back to "from address". address-reuse)
I think Electrum could add a warning that if you do not manually add the change address destination, the address will be reused.
2. Post 67082391 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Wed Aug 26 10:12:02 CEST 2026) in Import Private Keys: why is this feature so misused in wallets that support it?:
When creating a transaction and before submitting it to nodes, developers could add a + sign in the gui or "Advanced sending options." When you click on that, you would get a pop-up or a drop-down menu. One of the options could be "Select your own change address" with a warning that this is only for advanced users who know what they are doing, entering an address you don't have the keys to will result in the loss of bitcoin, etc., etc.
Whatever happens from that point on is the user's responsibility. Specify any address you want your change to go to. It can be from the HD wallet where you imported your private key(s), a different, unopened HD wallet, or an address not associated with that software. I am sure we would get complaints with time that people who didn't know what they were doing used this advanced feature and now they don't know what wallet the change went to. However, that's their fault. They shouldn't have played around with an advanced option.
You don't have to calculate the change amount manually.
Just fill the "Pay to many" field in this way:
Address A, 0.1
Address B, 0.2
Address C, !
This sends 0.1 BTC to address A, 0.2 BTC to address B, and the remaining amount to address C.
Great recommendation! I never thought about using the 'Pay to Many' feature as a way to control where my change goes.
3. Post 67081177 (unedited backup) (by el che) (scraped on Tue Aug 25 22:42:26 CEST 2026) in Duelbits.com | Instant BTC & ETH deposits & withdrawals! | Live Games & Slots! :
I just did a search to see what their terms say, but I couldn't get a clear answer.
I haven’t encountered this situation myself, but I don’t think you should create a new account, especially if support explicitly told you that it’s not allowed. Duelbits may have an internal policy regarding changing your email address or creating a new account. It’s strange that you can’t at least close the old account and use your new email address. If I were you, I’d ask support to explain the reason for the refusal and clarify whether there’s any way to resolve the issue.
Thanks to both of you for trying to help! Since I’ve already completed their KYC I would prefer to keep my current account and simply update the email address. While I’d be willing to close this account and open a new one, support warned me against doing that and I don't want to break any rules.
There should be an option to change your email, especially for verified users. The support agent initially asked me why I wanted to change it but after I explained my reasoning, he just said no, not possible.
Hopefully the official Duelbits rep here can shed some light on this. Most platforms let you change your email but not your username, whereas Duelbits allows username changes while locking down your email
4. Post 67081169 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Tue Aug 25 22:39:43 CEST 2026) in Import Private Keys: why is this feature so misused in wallets that support it?:
You don't have to calculate the change amount manually.
Just fill the "Pay to many" field in this way:
Address A, 0.1
Address B, 0.2
Address C, !
This sends 0.1 BTC to address A, 0.2 BTC to address B, and the remaining amount to address C.
Thanks for clarifying this for me, however, as I said, using pay to many just to manually specify the change output is a workaround. I would prefer a built-in feature specifically designed to handle the change amount.
Something like the "advanced wallet" proposed by SomberNight struck me as a great idea.
I think it would be really nice if there was an option to create an advanced wallet; a power user feature.
This wallet could not be restored from seed.
It would allow importing xprvs/xpubs: so the user could have multiple of these. Importing could even be allowed for existing wallets (not just in wizard at creation time). These could have differing script types associated with them.
I think even single privkeys/addresses could be allowed to be imported.
Perhaps the user could mark certain paths to be preferred to be given out as receive addresses, and others as preferred change.
5. Post 67081045 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Tue Aug 25 22:08:37 CEST 2026) in Import Private Keys: why is this feature so misused in wallets that support it?:
...
- Allowing users to send the change to a differet wallet of their choice (or a different keystore as you said)
It wouldn't be ideal, but it would make things easier for those who don't want to reuse the address, still, it's a workaround, so it's not ideal.
- Allowing users to import private keys and addresses into a single imported wallet
Better than the current setup, though I still view it as a workaround.
I'm against the first solution due to the obvious reasons.
I'm not against the two other solutions, but the problem is that even if they are implemented, they will be used only by advanced users, and advanced users already know how to send the change to a different address, and they don't need any new feature at all.
Even advanced users feel the need for a ready-made, more professional feature for their use cases. In the current scenario, Electrum limits key import for all users out of fear that careless users might lose their change balance (if it were moved to an HD account or the imported HD keystore). Yet, I don't see any real difference, because the same user can check
use change address and delete the imported-only keystore after made the transaction, thinking the imported spent private key still holds the balance (when in fact the funds went to a change address within the imported set). You see how there's room for user error in this case, too? And yet, I haven't seen anyone on Reddit report losing funds because of that.
In the current scenario, the imported keystore with use change address enabled is even worse: because it doesn't show which address the change goes to (unless they click on the preview transaction), further increasing the margin for error.
If you have a single private key and you want the change to be sent to a differet address, one method is use the pay-to-many feature. This is already available in Electrum.
You can also create a watch-only wallet containing two addresses. One should be the one you want to spend the funds from and the other one should be the unused address which you want the change to be sent to. In this method you have to create an unsigned transaction first and then sign it in another wallet.
Using "pay-to-many" just to specify a change address is a hacky, the user would have to manually subtract the exact change amount from the transaction to send it to their designated address. I've tried doing this, and it's a pain,
I wish the wallet handled this internally without requiring any user interation (unless the user specifically wanted to).
Again, I didn't say I don't agree with your proposal. My point is that I don't see any big issue with how Electrum currently works.
Creating 2 keystores, one just for private keys and another with watch-only addresses just to specify a change address by copying and pasting into the imported private key keystore... again, this is a workaround, and workarounds create room for errors that can lead to lost funds (like copying the wrong address, one for which the user doesn't hold the private key).
A more professional solution, such as an official wallet feature accompanied by appropriate warnings, is the best approach, but limiting features due to potential errors by a small fraction of users (likely less than 1% of the user base) is a mistake and punishes average/advanced users who already know how to use these features responsibly.
As an advanced user, I can already do this in Bitcoin Core: it imports directly into the current wallet.dat (or one chosen via the console tab), the change address goes to the existing wallet.dat, and everything is recorded in the transaction history. Unfortunately, however, not everyone can run a full node (or even a pruned node) due to storage space limitations.
I myself use Bitcoin Core as my main wallet because it meets my needs almost perfectly, but, I won't always have Bitcoin Core at my disposal, so a mobile wallet with similar functionality would be very helpful.
As SomberNight suggested, an "advanced wallet" option for power users, incorporating the features he proposed, would be ideal, or simply enabling the specific function, like importing a private key into an HD wallet's keystore (or into an HD wallet specified by the user via command) would sufficient.
6. Post 67080908 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Tue Aug 25 21:29:13 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
The time has come, here is a rewards sheet for Season 9.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PvErv5t712jEabbn-0EeDoRCMszf2JaFkrbsP8voEgA/edit?usp=sharingBy now you should know the drill but I will repeat some things anyway:
*check your BTC addressees and let me know if you need change, this is a combination of last year and sign up thread. If it is ok, no need to say anything.
*some league places and cup places are not final, that will be settled after the games this week. Numbers for those still playing could be wrong
*Season 10 buy ins are auto deducted. If you plan to leave BSFL (you receive full reward then) now is the moment to tell me. After rewards go out it will not be possible anymore.
Tagging everyone with special request for new members.
Ryu_Ar1
Asiska02
Zaguru12
red4slash
I want each of you to confirm you will be playing next season. This season we have one team too many in Div4 and it will give us quite a lot of work to accommodate it. We will let you all play but I don't want one of you just not playing after we do that
Happened to us in the past. People sign up and than forget about it.
vd309
Rikafip
cls63
cryptofrka
hosemary
jayce
ulven
Saint-loup
ralle14
slaman29
darxiaomi
Renato297
Trofo
el che
strongkored
Harkorede
mv1986
Slissy
Jinetics1111
goodpunt
Spack17
Da_Silva
notblox1
MAAManda
VashaUdacha777
vivekdkhyani
arallmuus
LTU_btc
leea-1334
Hhampuz
paco92x
Igebotz
buwaytress
Ozymandias_DZ
Dittoup
B1g4udge
HomieAllDay
imarios
chi20
slackovic
famososMuertos
LFC_Bitcoin
Ochan_yazo_tochant
Kokee44
mitchr4
Smartvirus
Koal-84
ILuckyGuyI
ajanwalker
russeras
cygan
hakan2217
un_rank
yassinmanai
Heyshbosh
entebah
General_Bitcoin
EarnOnVictor
Bitcoin Smith
Dump3er
ovcijisir
welovebit
Daniel91
pina_pino
BABY SHOES
xLays
Nheer
jeremypwr
execijutiere
Bitcoin_Budha
Note3
knuckey
7. Post 67080524 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Tue Aug 25 19:35:19 CEST 2026) in Import Private Keys: why is this feature so misused in wallets that support it?:
I’m very disappointed that you think this way, but let's move on. I’ll try to answer each of you.
I agree that considering a new wallet for each imported private key isnt a good solution
One alternative for the change address is to fully spend the recovered coins to a HD wallet.
When you say "recovered", you're referring to importing, right? If so, yes, e.g:
HD Account #0 (default) – Change from imported keys goes here.
HD Account #1
HD Account #2
Imported – whatever is spent from this keystore, the remaining balance (change) is sent to one of the keystores above or some keystore chosen by the user, it’s a sort of wallet creation feature within advanced options. SomberNight (one of Electrum's main devs) has already hinted at something like this:
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6016That already solves part of the problem.
But the days of saving private keys are gone. Since bip 39 and hd wallets (2013!) There is no reason to save private keys individually. Sometimes you might want to do that to recover forked coins or some other very specific usage.
bitmover, just because "no one" uses isolated keys anymore doesn't mean we have to kill the feature at all. If we followed that logic, we would kill the sweep feature too, since no one prints paper wallets anymore. Yet you still see a large number of wallets supporting that feature. That’s not how things are solved.
Self-custody is also about maintaining legacy restoration and handling methods. As I’ve said, there will always, always, be use cases different from yours or the majority of users.
I hardly think wallets will try to improve user experience in importing private keys individually. Bip 39 seeds are way better for 99% of the situations
If no one flags it to them, they certainly won't do it. BIP39 seed phrases are great, but that’s not the discussion here.
The wallets like Electrum are deterministic which means when you create a wallet all the keys inside that wallet are supposed to be derived from a seed.
I know that wallets generated by Electrum are deterministic. I mentioned "HD" 03 times in the OP.
If they allow you to import a separate key into that same wallet file, then it will contain a single key that cannot be derived from that seed and cannot be recovered by it either. It also creates complications for other parts of the code which need to take that into consideration.
That’s not true, as I said, Electrum had this feature before v2.0, watch this
video, and Bitcoin Core works exactly the way I described, so it is possible to implement it without breaking other parts of the code.
So it is easier to force the user to create a separate wallet that consists of all imported keys and has no seed.
With the design I explained above, the wallet without a seed cannot "derive" any new keys to be used for change. So you have 2 options: (1) manually select a change address (2) use your wallet with seed and sweep the key instead of importing it. After that each spend will create a change address.
No, nothing forced is acceptable in a self-custody environment, so such a thing shouldn't be acceptable. If at least the imported wallet keystore worked in a way that let the user choose where the change goes (like the scenario I suggested above to bitmover) or specify an output address... but no, it works in a completely lousy way, ended up reusing addresses.
Reusing address is not recommended but it is not as terrible as you think. Specially from a security perspective, as long as the wallet you are using is not broken there is no reason to attack your keys just because you revealed the public key and if it is broken then you should not be using it for anything let alone for this.
Just because something is not as terrible as I think it is, that doesn't mean we should just give up and not follow security best practices. I’m not worried about being attacked, I just wish the wallet I’m using offered at least the options I mentioned. That’s all. Is that too much to ask?
I’m not asking Electrum to create isolated keys the way Core used to, I’m just asking for at least an "advanced wallet" option in Electrum that allows for importing private keys and addresses, and gives the user 100% control over where the change goes (or, by default, sends it to an HD account pre-selected by the software). SomberNight has already expressed interest in this:
implement advanced wallet option: multiple xpubs, mixed script types, and similar (maybe with output script descriptors)They did. In early versions, each key was created randomly therefore the wallet file had to be backed up again after each key generation (it generated multiple at a time though).
In later versions, they made it deterministic meaning new keys were still generated using that original seed (seed is the entropy used for child key derivation, not to me confused with mnemonic).
And exactly because in bitcoin core you have to create a file-backup of your wallet (it doesn't support mnemonic) the approach can be different.
Actually no, Bitcoin Core doesn't need to back up the wallet file repeatedly anymore, it doesn't generate "a bunch of keys" in batches. Bitcoin Core uses BIP32, and keys are generated from the BIP32 root key (the xpriv), so it creates deterministic wallets. I explain this further in my thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5498210.0
As you know, Electrum doesn't allow users to generate a single private key, and whenever you want to generate a new wallet, it only allows them to generate a HD wallet.
That's not what I expressed interest in. I didn't ask Electrum to provide an option to create isolated keys, I’m referring to the existing key import feature, and whether the software would provide an "advanced wallet" option where the user can choose which account/keystore the change goes to, or if an imported key is added to the current HD keystore it was imported into, exactly like it worked prior to version 2.0 (that last scenario I mentioned).
Therefore most of Electrum users (including almost all non-techincal users) have a HD wallet with seed phrase and since the "Use change address" option is enabled by default, they always use change addresses for their transactions.
The import private key feature in Electrum is mostly used by technical users and those who have very old wallets created before seed phrase were introduced.
The
use change address option only works well for standard Electrum wallets or imported HD wallets, but not for imported keys and addresses. Test it yourself with testnet coins: import a few private keys into an "imported" wallet, check the "use change address" option, and you'll see what I mean. You'll find that with imported key keystores:
- use change address doesn't work as well as it does in HD wallets, there is no control.
- You have to keep importing new private keys so that new change outputs go to new imported keys, following the order in which they were imported (as they appear in the Addresses tab, respecting the queue).
- You cannot import public addresses into a keystore where you initially imported private keys and vice-versa during creation. Why? What is the logic behind that?
Run this test, and you should reach the same conclusion.
The Electrum developer himself has pointed out that Electrum's current architecture (especially for imported keystores) is "severely limited." He proposes creating an advanced wallet with features for advanced users, one that would allow importing xprivs/xpubs and even private keys/addresses (exactly how it currently works in Bitcoin Core). See here:
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6016I think it would be really nice if there was an option to create an advanced wallet; a power user feature.
This wallet could not be restored from seed.
It would allow importing xprvs/xpubs: so the user could have multiple of these. Importing could even be allowed for existing wallets (not just in wizard at creation time). These could have differing script types associated with them.
I think even single privkeys/addresses could be allowed to be imported.
Perhaps the user could mark certain paths to be preferred to be given out as receive addresses, and others as preferred change.
8. Post 67075453 (unedited backup) (by ralle14) (scraped on Mon Aug 24 04:15:13 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Congratulations ralle14, but your stay in the first division has cost me 4 mBTC so far.
If Newcastle doesn't lose and their match has over 2.5 goals, I will lose 1.5 mBTC more.
I wasn't expecting the damage of the round loss to pile that much, but hey, there's always the next one.
On the other hand, the win catapulted me from 14th to 9th. The goal was only to avoid relegation, and I surprisingly gained 1.5mbtc more after the final standings were out.
9. Post 67075350 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Mon Aug 24 01:59:19 CEST 2026) in Paper wallet the only option left?:
You don't need an internet connection to
import a private key, but in
your previous post, you said "
sweep", not "
import".
Sweeping a private key is different from importing a private key. You need an internet connection to sweep a private key.
The thing is, some wallets like Sparrow only allow sweap the privkey/paperwallet balance, creating an on-chain transaction, while other wallets like Bitcoin Core only import (this one, works both online and offline).
Yes, thinking about it, what you said makes sense, the sweeping only happens when the wallet software is online (I hadn't thought about that). And yes, it's insecure if the machine has some kind of infostealer that detects privkeys or a bot that scans any key for balances almost instantly.
Electrum allows both importing (new keystore only) and sweeping (balance goes to the HD account, the key is not incorporated). Electrum used to allow a private key to be imported into the same keystore wallet file, so it would work offline, with the change going to the HD account balance (correct me if I'm wrong).
This was the case until version 2.0 in 2014 or '15, but they removed this feature due to user errors where they would lose balances (now it's only allowed to import keys in isolation, in a single keystore for imported keys). The users would discard the entire wallet (to which the key was imported and incorporated into the HD account keystore) thinking that the change balance "remained" in the paper wallet after spending, but the change was returned to the HD account.
I think this import approach is better than simply importing, and that's why Bitcoin Core is the only wallet that still works this way: after the private key is imported, it is incorporated into the wallet.dat keystore along with other HD accounts/descriptors. I think it's better because the approach of importing the key allows the user to set up the transaction offline if they want.
I hope that clarifies everything.
10. Post 67074406 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 20:09:26 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Division 1
Division 2
Division 3
Division 4| •POS• | ••Username•••• | •PLD• | •W• | •D• | •L• | •SF• | •SA• | •SD• | •PTS• |
1 |  Heyshbosh | 17 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 74 | 51 | 23 | 32 |
2 |  entebah | 17 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 69 | 56 | 13 | 32 |
3 | General_Bitcoin | 17 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 67 | 65 | 2 | 31 |
4 | EarnOnVictor | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 68 | 58 | 10 | 30 |
5 | Bitcoin Smith | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 64 | 53 | 11 | 29 |
6 |  Dump3er | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 66 | 51 | 15 | 28 |
7 |  ovcijisir | 17 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 62 | 54 | 8 | 28 |
8 | welovebit | 17 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 64 | 62 | 2 | 28 |
9 |  Daniel91 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 65 | 62 | 3 | 27 |
10 | pina_pino | 17 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 53 | 54 | -1 | 27 |
11 | BABY SHOES | 17 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 59 | 7 | 26 |
12 |  xLays | 17 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 65 | 59 | 6 | 26 |
13 | Nheer | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 59 | 54 | 5 | 26 |
14 |  jeremypwr | 17 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 59 | 56 | 3 | 24 |
15 | execijutiere | 17 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 53 | 53 | 0 | 23 |
16 | Bitcoin_Budha | 17 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 63 | 74 | -11 | 15 |
17 | Note3 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 48 | -48 | 0 |
18 | knuckey | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 48 | -48 | 0 |
W - Games Won, L - Games Lost, D - Games Drawn
POS - League Position, SD - Score Difference, SF - Score For
SA - Score Against, PLD - Games Played, PTS - Points Earned
Round 17 - Results| _______________________________ | _______________________________ | _______________________________ | _______________________________ |
Division 1
 slaman29 3-6  vd309 Rikafip 3-0  Renato297 cls63 3-4  jayce strongkored 4-4  Trofo Harkorede 5-3  darxiaomi ralle14 6-3  hosemary cryptofrka 4-4  el che mv1986 4-4  Saint-loup ulven 3-0  Slissy
| Division 2
 notblox1 6-5  B1g4udge MAAManda 6-4  arallmuus Hhampuz 5-6  paco92x leea-1334 2-4  Igebotz Ozymandias_DZ 5-5  Dittoup Spack17 3-2  buwaytress VashaUdacha777 4-3  goodpunt Da_Silva 2-4  Jinetics1111 vivekdkhyani 5-7  LTU_btc
| Division 3
 HomieAllDay 3-0  LFC_Bitcoin mitchr4 5-5  ILuckyGuyI chi20 5-5  Ochan_yazo_tochant imarios 3-5  Kokee44 un_rank 6-3  Koal-84 slackovic 3-6  cygan Smartvirus 6-5  ajanwalker russeras 6-3  hakan2217 yassinmanai 6-4  famososMuertos
| Division 4
- xLays 4-3 Heyshbosh
- ovcijisir 3-4 Daniel91
- welovebit 3-4 General_Bitcoin
- Nheer 4-3 execijutiere
- pina_pino 3-0 knuckey
- Bitcoin_Budha 4-6 entebah
- Note3 0-3 jeremypwr
- BABY SHOES 5-5 EarnOnVictor
- Bitcoin Smith 5-5 Dump3er
|
[/list]
11. Post 67074119 (unedited backup) (by Rainbet) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 18:25:01 CEST 2026) in 🟢 Rainbet.com | ⚽ Serie A ⚽ Inter vs Monza ⚽ August 22:
Congrats to the winners
LFC_Bitcoin
hosemary
12. Post 67073334 (unedited backup) (by arallmuus) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 13:04:07 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Hosemary on the other hand is under pressure from Ralle as well, If Real Madrid wins then hosemary gonna lose his round. gonna get draw at the best possible scenario so vd would still win the div1 trophy
Why did you cross out that part of your post? It was correct.
Yeah it was correct but I figured since vd won his round already and the best case scenario for you would be a draw which wasnt enough to win the trophy
Vd started posting again after mafia triggered him then he show them by winning the league
Let's go Spirit then! Finishing 2nd generally sucks imho, but better to win 12.5 mBTC than 11. That 1.5 mBTC difference will be a nice amount once bitcoin goes to 1 million USD.
What a luck. While others are struggling to win their last game, your opponent didnt submit then you somehow made it to 2nd spot. Best possible case that you could hope for
13. Post 67073086 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 11:09:56 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :
My bad, I should have written the full form. LOG meant to say Letter of Guarantee (thanks hosemary, for your reply). In it, we can see when our deal is going to expire, although if a timer is mentioned on the deal page as well, then that would be a lot better, really. But still, what I meant to say is, when a deal is about to end, like if its time is 35 minutes or whatever, then maybe a normal practice exchange has a script for rechecking whether the TX even took place or not. So after the window is cleared, the exchange's backup script checks that, and that was the one that confirmed your TX instead of the main process or script which was supposed to.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I now understand that you meant the Letter of Guarantee, which I downloaded and verified. The expiry time wasn't 35 minutes; it was three hours. But the tx appeared in 35 minutes and took around 50 minutes, or maybe an hour, to reach 10 confirmations. There was no problem with the exchange, as I said, except for the delay. I don't know how other exchanges check the transaction, but MoBit detected my deposit within a minute, I guess. But then, I had to wait this long, and it was showing as filling the order, if I am not wrong. As for the failed exchange, I provided my refund address when I initiated the swap. So, I guess I would have received the USDT back to my address if the swap failed.
14. Post 67072874 (unedited backup) (by slackovic) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 08:47:55 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
/snip
Spirit has already beaten Yandex in the lower bracket final. This means that vd309 has officially won the first division, you finished second, and CLS63 finished third.
Congratulations to vd309 and you, but I don't think CLS63 is very happy with third place.
If this is correct, then congratulations to vd309! Winning this competition with so many participants is a feat in itself. But winning it 4 times in 9 seasons is a truly admirable achievement. If only we knew your secret...
unfortunately, i haven't secured my 5-3 lead over you yet...
there are still the last 3 questions left, and we've given different answers to all 3 of them
in the worst case, i could still lose this round against you... so it's still completely open...
No, no. You got it wrong. That's not a worst case scenario. It's the best case scenario
15. Post 67072781 (unedited backup) (by Rikafip) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 07:47:43 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Good for Rikafip. He will finish third at the worst. If Spirit wins, Rikafip will finish second.
Let's go Spirit then! Finishing 2nd generally sucks imho, but better to win 12.5 mBTC than 11. That 1.5 mBTC difference will be a nice amount once bitcoin goes to 1 million USD.
16. Post 67072639 (unedited backup) (by ralle14) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 05:02:38 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
I'd like to thank hosemary for sacrificing this round and helping us secure our stay in Div 1.
I only expected to win at least one point at the start of the second half, but ended up grabbing both for the early win.
Also, congrats to el che for bagging his second LMS win, and that's one chunky prize pot to walk away with.
17. Post 67072295 (unedited backup) (by Harkorede) (scraped on Sun Aug 23 00:33:32 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Hosemary on the other hand is under pressure from Ralle as well, If Real Madrid wins then hosemary gonna lose his round. gonna get draw at the best possible scenario so vd would still win the div1 trophy
Why did you cross out that part of your post? It was correct.
Real Madrid won, and I lost this round. I was very hopeful about winning the first division until the 90th minute of Real's match, but now I can finish fourth at the best. If crpytofrka gets a point from the last question, I will finish fifth.
Good for Rikafip. He will finish third at the worst. If Spirit wins, Rikafip will finish second.
And the winner of the first division will be either CLS63 or vd309. If Spirit wins tomorrow, the winner will be vd309, and if they don't, the winner will be CLS63.
CLS doing Fenerbahçe does best, choke when you think they’ve got an easy ride… What a way to end the season, though, with the title still yet to be decided at this stage. I really needed Real Madrid to win with a clean sheet for me to finish in the 15th position, but Real Madrid ensuring they won means that Trofo still keeps is 1 point lead, and if Spirit does fail to reach the grand finals, or lose in the grand finals to PARIVISION, then both Strongkored and mv would be the ones on the chopping block, while I get to live to fight another day.
As for my sidebet against uncle Bubu buwaytress, it’s a wrap already for me, I’m now leading in this round by 3 points, and just one question left between us, which means at worse, I’ll win by a point, defeating him in mid table division 2, while I’m battling relegation in division 1 is still pretty much surprising.
18. Post 67071797 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Sat Aug 22 21:48:19 CEST 2026) in Paper wallet the only option left?:
You shouldn't swap your private key, if it belongs to a paper wallet.
Note that the swap feature works only if the device is online, and if you use your private key on an online device, you would defeat the purpose of a paper wallet.
In Bitcoin Core, it's possible to import the privkey using importprivkey /
importdescriptors depending on the Bitcoin Core version. Such features work offline, allowing users to sign a PSBT and transmit it securely to a device with an online software wallet. Electrum is also capable of this, and perhaps Sparrow as well, it would be helpful if someone could confirm this.
19. Post 67070856 (unedited backup) (by slaman29) (scraped on Sat Aug 22 16:45:25 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Congrats @el che! Have you won LMS before? I never came close but I have to try and inspect the buyin system next season maybe to play a bit more risk than I usually did
And well done @hosemary for keeping the title away from mafia hands
I was kidding.
CLS63 has a much higher chance to win the first division.
I know you were! But who knows if we kept up the joke it would have become a mafia truth
20. Post 67070622 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Aug 22 15:31:07 CEST 2026) in LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days):
Weekly update (2026-08-14_Fri_05.18h)theymos' raw data (format: time amount msg user_from user_to)Sample1786675109 1 5591151.msg67040701 289817 3729214
1786674915 2 5591180.msg67041620 3419471 846936
1786673284 1 5546384.msg67041285 252510 3661617
1786673157 1 5546384.msg67041181 252510 3691552
1786673155 1 5457330.msg62663608 3719408 3486361
1786671732 1 5487753.msg67040244 252510 3750180
1786671654 1 5173493.msg67039636 1174868 3575638
1786671247 1 178336.msg67040877 120694 2755547
1786671216 1 178336.msg67040593 120694 198573
1786668871 5 232519.msg67041145 1068464 3736572
1786668092 1 178336.msg67042135 33156 198573
1786667953 1 178336.msg67042133 198573 33156
1786667944 6 5561071.msg65875208 1554927 314792
1786667884 1 26136.msg67040632 3527653 85033
1786667874 1 5589927.msg67041072 33156 3322606
1786667871 1 5589966.msg67041816 33156 949248
1786666346 1 5224503.msg67041019 2003859 1825672
1786666222 5 5409125.msg67040985 140584 894012
1786666010 1 5224503.msg67040937 537028 2003859
1786665987 1 5590049.msg67007631 1593137 2850161
1786665969 1 5590049.msg67010729 1593137 1107222
1786665965 1 5590049.msg67011024 1593137 1414197
1786665962 1 5590049.msg67014816 1593137 3532447
1786665954 1 5590049.msg67033375 1593137 1414197
1786665949 1 5590049.msg67028414 1593137 2850161
1786665946 1 5590049.msg67017036 1593137 1107222
1786665065 1 5583197.msg66887159 350580 3322606
1786665035 1 5589158.msg67007131 3516832 3508793
1786664958 1 5479271.msg67041897 3528115 2015418
1786664918 1 5479271.msg67038836 3528115 335088
1786664909 1 5479271.msg67038534 3528115 1593137
1786663295 2 5590691.msg67023331 3611603 3283582
1786663180 3 5588819.msg67013080 3611603 3743297
1786662703 2 232519.msg67041794 1634314 2811340
1786662662 1 232519.msg67041330 1634314 350580
1786662484 1 5590834.msg67028491 1247226 1360301
1786662445 1 5590834.msg67030599 1247226 1053119
1786662232 5 5588367.msg66938596 3664701 3698024
1786661556 1 5582628.msg66840235 3723796 1093578
1786661340 1 5588886.msg67041555 97582 317618
1786660704 2 5588886.msg67041555 881377 317618
1786660572 1 5589927.msg67041072 252510 3322606
1786660353 1 5588886.msg67041555 397633 317618
1786660179 1 5224503.msg67041019 317618 1825672
1786659970 2 5588606.msg66946995 407174 3762667
1786659770 1 5590251.msg67007337 949248 1000199
1786659033 1 178336.msg67040480 33156 35501
1786659030 1 178336.msg67040529 33156 120694
1786659028 1 5591154.msg67041206 33156 3570710
1786659025 1 5589075.msg66967398 33156 3254306
.......
.......
.......
1516833930 7 2228.msg29479 135920 3
1516833833 1 178336.msg28855702 479624 1130992
1516833813 1 2817737.msg28849540 1001644 990403
1516833798 21 5.msg28 520313 3
1516833796 1 2808926.msg28728384 140584 35
1516833779 1 178336.msg28853916 479624 33156
1516833756 20 2482937.msg25417254 101872 135920
1516833713 21 5.msg28 169515 3
1516833686 1 2818179.msg28855276 994466 1196028
1516833610 49 1545652.msg15536651 206143 520313
1516833593 1 2818066.msg28855136 260067 520313
1516833592 2 2806168.msg28855427 520313 355846
1516833591 49 1545652.msg15536651 881377 520313
1516833523 1 2818066.msg28855343 539826 340795
1516833521 1 2818066.msg28855136 514126 520313
1516833478 1 2818066.msg28855136 482980 520313
1516833460 1 2818066.msg28854596 93844 520313
1516833451 1 2816214.msg28845827 1083353 1520388
1516833430 50 178608.msg28854963 884600 520313
1516833349 1 178336.msg28852898 479624 1521711
1516833346 1 2812863.msg28785611 303315 1707287
1516833329 1 2818066.msg28854596 206143 520313
1516833326 1 178336.msg28852768 479624 181806
1516833304 1 2818066.msg28853325 340795 877396
1516833289 1 2716104.msg28846824 1239985 1739247
1516833281 1 2818066.msg28853686 206143 136484
1516833252 1 2816647.msg28837916 169515 1701092
1516833251 1 178336.msg28849600 479624 172400
1516833237 1 2677441.msg28778318 123412 1090430
1516833230 1 2814078.msg28796083 520313 881377
1516833207 1 2772292.msg28837085 1189487 1028592
1516833203 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833199 1 2818066.msg28853325 926641 877396
1516833148 1 2808926.msg28793321 78147 35
1516833148 1 2634042.msg28672219 123412 1094601
1516833111 1 2818066.msg28855136 535215 520313
1516833078 45 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516833070 1 2818066.msg28855136 881377 520313
1516833049 1 2677441.msg28848945 88254 903139
1516833048 1 2818066.msg28855136 101872 520313
1516833044 5 2818066.msg28855019 135920 688810
1516833001 5 2813828.msg28801076 135920 101872
1516832978 1 2384335.msg28854772 1344962 1101839
1516832969 1 2818066.msg28855136 881564 520313
1516832953 1 2818066.msg28854621 520313 101872
1516832934 1 2818066.msg28855136 877396 520313
1516832874 1 178608.msg28792130 884600 35
1516832842 5 2818066.msg28853325 688810 877396
1516832833 2 178336.msg28852079 479624 1257516
1516831941 1 2818066.msg28853325 35 877396
Full list* (57 MB) (not limited to 120 days, 2660 Merit transactions added since my previous update).
theymos' data (human readable format, including usernames and post titles)SampleOn Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:38:29 AM CEST,
NotFuzzyWarm (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Supreme Donvic (
history) for
Re: Cultisms in the society who are to be blame: parents, government or environment .
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:35:15 AM CEST,
non fungible anxiety (
history) sent 2 Merit to
sabotag3x (
history) for
Tokens de graça no ChatGPT.
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:08:04 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Gost ms (
history) for
Re: Balancing Financial security and Bitcoin Accumulation .
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:05:57 AM CEST,
JayJuanGee (
history) sent 1 Merit to
ASloveapg (
history) for
Re: Balancing Financial security and Bitcoin Accumulation .
On Fri 14 Aug 2026 04:05:55 AM CEST,
TypoTonic (
history) sent 1 Merit to
PowerGlove (
history) for
Re: A concise 2FA/TOTP implementation (SMF patch).
.......
.......
.......
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:28:54 PM CET,
AdolfinWolf (
history) sent 1 Merit to
Lutpin (
history) for
Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:54 PM CET,
Dahman El_Harrachi (
history) sent 1 Merit to
theymos (
history) for
Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?).
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:22 PM CET,
Tyrantt (
history) sent 5 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:27:13 PM CET,
Last of the V8s (
history) sent 2 Merit to
Rosewater Foundation (
history) for
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 11:12:21 PM CET,
theymos (
history) sent 1 Merit to
AdolfinWolf (
history) for
What is the function of the "Merit" score?.
Full list (608 MB)
Usernames to go with theymos' dataSample0:
deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) (
history) earned: 0 Merit.
3:
satoshi (
history) earned: 8877 Merit.
4:
sirius (
history) earned: 935 Merit.
10:
Xunie (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
11:
madhatter (
history) earned: 16 Merit.
.......
.......
.......
3764227:
Zeto Cash (
history) earned: 71 Merit.
3764700:
rajashek41 (
history) earned: 2 Merit.
3764752:
truedevil (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
3765001:
nipperk (
history) earned: 19 Merit.
3765116:
nico01 (
history) earned: 1 Merit.
Full list* (10 MB)
Usernames machine readableSample0: deMerit (Bitcoin Forum)
3: satoshi
4: sirius
10: Xunie
11: madhatter
12: nanaimogold
13: SmokeTooMuch
14: The Madhatter
21: AgoraMutual
23: 1 currency now
24: dwdollar
26: NewLibertyStandard
27: riX
28: Sabunir
29: giik
30: BitcoinFX
31: Suggester
33: m0mchil
34: BlueSky
35: theymos
37: soultcer
40: xc
42: ec
49: Cdecker
51: DannyM
97: dsg
101: Goldstein
143: laszlo
145: ducki2p
146: Brandon
163: Karmicads
182: Derrick
183: hugolp
198: allinvain
203: HostFat
206: teppy
217: SirArthur
224: Gavin Andresen
237: lachesis
241: QuantumMechanic
244: nixoid
251: wobber
262: chaord
267: virtualcoin
269: Bitcoiner
270: llama
271: Timo Y
274: limikael
284: joey.rich
288: Stone Man
.......
.......
.......
3761774: scoorched
3761866: Otomato
3761923: Korvane.io
3761990: Alex_Yann(Hammer Miner)
3761992: Diceftw
3762146: Cinexa
3762178: Bamskki
3762182: Aliikhanii
3762184: xiaoyu1222006
3762229: lattica-core
3762275: DigitalDonkeyBlocks
3762314: apide01
3762360: Midisk
3762413: Ndnx1
3762435: exWhale
3762536: DurakCrypto
3762577: Sowat
3762578: sidrabtc
3762667: Luckiest
3762721: Fire_man
3762738: Prince patrick
3762844: monerica
3762860: PolarCrypto
3762899: Akos26
3763135: Geould
3763168: jaxx.bet
3763191: greysonz
3763248: xxxmourn
3763270: swapsslol
3763276: MegRewards
3763338: omenswap
3763404: Rmun1217
3763459: ohio_jaunt
3763560: paygate-love
3763611: Hazebet.co
3763618: rice_cooker
3763696: Gerdino
3763797: SCORAS
3763826: puzzle_72_worker
3763872: Danish Ali
3763895: Papa_Mojet
3764024: ColdcardVictim
3764049: OLDBOY 003
3764119: IntervalWalker
3764157: MrGambler531
3764227: Zeto Cash
3764700: rajashek41
3764752: truedevil
3765001: nipperk
3765116: nico01
Full list (2 MB)
UserIDs, sent Merit and earned Merit machine readableSample0:569:0
3:0:8877
4:0:935
10:0:1
11:0:16
12:0:2
13:3:96
14:0:13
21:0:2
23:0:1
24:0:9
26:0:19
27:0:54
28:0:13
29:0:4
30:380:800
31:0:1
33:0:27
34:0:4
35:14557:15027
37:0:6
40:0:4
42:0:69
49:0:5
51:0:2
97:0:2
101:0:2
143:0:2742
145:0:2
146:0:4
163:0:21
182:1:0
183:9:1
198:2:87
203:68:311
206:0:14
217:3:36
224:0:1494
237:0:6
241:0:9
244:0:1
251:0:1
262:0:1
267:0:2
269:0:2
270:0:57
271:0:1
274:0:42
284:0:6
288:0:11
.......
.......
.......
3761774:0:1
3761866:0:1
3761923:0:1
3761990:0:1
3761992:0:1
3762146:1:15
3762178:0:8
3762182:0:1
3762184:0:1
3762229:0:1
3762275:0:2
3762314:0:3
3762360:0:1
3762413:0:1
3762435:0:1
3762536:0:2
3762577:0:1
3762578:0:2
3762667:0:6
3762721:0:1
3762738:0:1
3762844:0:2
3762860:0:32
3762899:0:6
3763135:0:2
3763168:0:1
3763191:0:3
3763248:0:1
3763270:0:1
3763276:0:4
3763338:0:1
3763404:0:3
3763459:0:2
3763560:0:1
3763611:0:1
3763618:0:1
3763696:0:1
3763797:0:15
3763826:0:15
3763872:2:14
3763895:0:1
3764024:40:119
3764049:0:22
3764119:0:1
3764157:0:1
3764227:0:71
3764700:0:2
3764752:0:1
3765001:0:19
3765116:0:1
Full list (1 MB)
Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 51686Sample 1. 21468 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 1121 unique users in 12445 transactions
2. 21297 Merit received by fillippone (#1852120) from 772 unique users in 11633 transactions
3. 18912 Merit received by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) from 801 unique users in 9991 transactions
4. 15628 Merit received by El duderino_ (#1067333) from 480 unique users in 8971 transactions
5. 15027 Merit received by theymos (#35) from 1230 unique users in 5455 transactions
6. 13868 Merit received by JayJuanGee (#252510) from 741 unique users in 9127 transactions
7. 13285 Merit received by icopress (#1137579) from 620 unique users in 4978 transactions
8. 12132 Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) from 505 unique users in 6660 transactions
9. 12085 Merit received by cygan (#27470) from 536 unique users in 6187 transactions
10. 11957 Merit received by Symmetrick (#2627711) from 773 unique users in 6854 transactions
11. 11430 Merit received by pooya87 (#379147) from 618 unique users in 6662 transactions
12. 11374 Merit received by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) from 655 unique users in 6472 transactions
13. 11342 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 588 unique users in 6518 transactions
14. 10654 Merit received by nutildah (#317618) from 676 unique users in 5744 transactions
15. 10506 Merit received by xhomerx10 (#120694) from 331 unique users in 5364 transactions
16. 10442 Merit received by gmaxwell (#11425) from 347 unique users in 3801 transactions
17. 10415 Merit received by TryNinja (#557798) from 567 unique users in 4616 transactions
18. 10119 Merit received by NotATether (#2739424) from 543 unique users in 4669 transactions
19. 10112 Merit received by GazetaBitcoin (#1285797) from 406 unique users in 3518 transactions
20. 10025 Merit received by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) from 474 unique users in 5023 transactions
21. 9993 Merit received by d5000 (#85033) from 462 unique users in 5467 transactions
22. 9303 Merit received by ABCbits (#359716) from 543 unique users in 5028 transactions
23. 8967 Merit received by nc50lc (#1237156) from 412 unique users in 4631 transactions
24. 8955 Merit received by Pmalek (#112493) from 587 unique users in 5316 transactions
25. 8877 Merit received by satoshi (#3) from 413 unique users in 936 transactions
26. 8812 Merit received by dkbit98 (#1410401) from 458 unique users in 5222 transactions
27. 8542 Merit received by suchmoon (#234771) from 573 unique users in 4859 transactions
28. 8249 Merit received by Rikafip (#2658890) from 465 unique users in 4526 transactions
29. 7665 Merit received by bitmover (#1554927) from 594 unique users in 4559 transactions
30. 7614 Merit received by 1miau (#2143453) from 496 unique users in 4138 transactions
31. 7420 Merit received by AlcoHoDL (#998490) from 202 unique users in 4246 transactions
32. 7316 Merit received by PowerGlove (#3486361) from 235 unique users in 1874 transactions
33. 7198 Merit received by mikeywith (#2033515) from 405 unique users in 3671 transactions
34. 7071 Merit received by cAPSLOCK (#35501) from 230 unique users in 4033 transactions
35. 6947 Merit received by hosemary (#995810) from 406 unique users in 3830 transactions
36. 6937 Merit received by DaveF (#300014) from 386 unique users in 3527 transactions
37. 6878 Merit received by joker_josue (#97582) from 350 unique users in 3235 transactions
38. 6793 Merit received by stompix (#164749) from 494 unique users in 3774 transactions
39. 6791 Merit received by achow101 (#290195) from 278 unique users in 3043 transactions
40. 6775 Merit received by Hhampuz (#881377) from 959 unique users in 4412 transactions
41. 6711 Merit received by Lucius (#533583) from 533 unique users in 3878 transactions
42. 6591 Merit received by Hueristic (#198573) from 208 unique users in 3813 transactions
43. 6549 Merit received by OmegaStarScream (#375981) from 433 unique users in 3587 transactions
44. 6493 Merit received by Charles-Tim (#2776678) from 437 unique users in 3796 transactions
45. 6367 Merit received by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) from 626 unique users in 3586 transactions
46. 6272 Merit received by NeuroticFish (#257071) from 462 unique users in 3495 transactions
47. 6272 Merit received by jeremypwr (#137185) from 222 unique users in 3649 transactions
48. 6086 Merit received by n0nce (#3373858) from 196 unique users in 2648 transactions
49. 5792 Merit received by lovesmayfamilis (#1982152) from 460 unique users in 4071 transactions
50. 5772 Merit received by DireWolfM14 (#2003859) from 396 unique users in 2736 transactions
.......
.......
.......
51637. 1 Merit received by 1ceStorm (#2342907) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51638. 1 Merit received by 1ce (#1019784) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51639. 1 Merit received by 1camtron (#1236351) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51640. 1 Merit received by 1apayment (#1855631) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51641. 1 Merit received by 1907KFY (#1935217) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51642. 1 Merit received by 16xypjnxlrew (#2705665) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51643. 1 Merit received by 16tonn (#3560052) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51644. 1 Merit received by 15horses1donkey (#560958) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51645. 1 Merit received by 15519028115Q (#3575647) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51646. 1 Merit received by 15262kk (#291561) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51647. 1 Merit received by 14z4rus (#3669471) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51648. 1 Merit received by 1453ist (#1431126) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51649. 1 Merit received by 1453eko (#1431103) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51650. 1 Merit received by 13Winter13 (#919666) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51651. 1 Merit received by 13ex07 (#1207068) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51652. 1 Merit received by 13dizel (#1208678) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51653. 1 Merit received by 1357924680 (#333305) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51654. 1 Merit received by 12tribes (#1221082) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51655. 1 Merit received by 12assa34 (#1729394) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51656. 1 Merit received by 123tm (#848549) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51657. 1 Merit received by 123pogi123 (#2252156) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51658. 1 Merit received by 123exo123 (#1919155) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51659. 1 Merit received by 112_blockchain (#2081987) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51660. 1 Merit received by 11:11pas (#1306783) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51661. 1 Merit received by 1083ivangod (#1952712) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51662. 1 Merit received by 101Crypta (#1287691) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51663. 1 Merit received by 100x (#80115) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51664. 1 Merit received by 100steeze (#3637720) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51665. 1 Merit received by 100%_Shared_FreeBitco.in (#2531436) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51666. 1 Merit received by 100monet (#323057) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51667. 1 Merit received by 1000x (#3509491) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51668. 1 Merit received by 1000usdforwife (#1547718) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51669. 1 Merit received by 1000alasan (#2458354) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51670. 1 Merit received by 0xMuted (#3713926) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51671. 1 Merit received by 0xBrian (#2625170) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51672. 1 Merit received by 0xb100d (#1342964) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51673. 1 Merit received by 0x77 (#3316521) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51674. 1 Merit received by 0x1Knowledge (#2000899) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51675. 1 Merit received by 0vx (#2805438) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51676. 1 Merit received by 0RajA0 (#1151527) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51677. 1 Merit received by 0nion (#3614135) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51678. 1 Merit received by 0bit (#493268) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51679. 1 Merit received by 063Myxa (#1432563) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51680. 1 Merit received by 05btc (#2050202) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51681. 1 Merit received by 00RedBlack00 (#2527578) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51682. 1 Merit received by 00hello (#2471124) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51683. 1 Merit received by $--Perfect. Exchange-$. (#1140007) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51684. 1 Merit received by $imple$imon (#2060672) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51685. 1 Merit received by $BitMakeR$ (#1166812) from 1 unique users in 1 transactions
51686. 0 Merit received by gwsukabokepjepang (#2536607) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions
Full list (5 MB)
Total number of users who gave away 1 or more sMerit: 26738Sample 1. 77452 Merit sent by El duderino_ (#1067333) to 912 unique users in 13120 transactions
2. 72021 Merit sent by fillippone (#1852120) to 2302 unique users in 31449 transactions
3. 69496 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 3353 unique users in 18172 transactions
4. 62829 Merit sent by JayJuanGee (#252510) to 3675 unique users in 60585 transactions
5. 60639 Merit sent by ABCbits (#359716) to 4747 unique users in 34721 transactions
6. 54638 Merit sent by vapourminer (#33156) to 3804 unique users in 37726 transactions
7. 45699 Merit sent by hugeblack (#1059082) to 2937 unique users in 16177 transactions
8. 41808 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 2887 unique users in 9159 transactions
9. 39412 Merit sent by xandry (#382413) to 2547 unique users in 14582 transactions
10. 38350 Merit sent by DdmrDdmr (#1582324) to 2965 unique users in 31060 transactions
11. 36044 Merit sent by LFC_Bitcoin (#379487) to 1601 unique users in 14243 transactions
12. 33984 Merit sent by klarki (#407174) to 2217 unique users in 11540 transactions
13. 33333 Merit sent by Symmetrick (#2627711) to 2254 unique users in 16803 transactions
14. 32897 Merit sent by The Sceptical Chymist (#487418) to 1495 unique users in 10468 transactions
15. 30049 Merit sent by EFS (#140584) to 1467 unique users in 7869 transactions
16. 29539 Merit sent by Welsh (#84521) to 1742 unique users in 6902 transactions
17. 26646 Merit sent by o_e_l_e_o (#1188543) to 2510 unique users in 9360 transactions
18. 25901 Merit sent by 1miau (#2143453) to 1317 unique users in 11630 transactions
19. 25072 Merit sent by qwk (#24140) to 603 unique users in 6491 transactions
20. 23536 Merit sent by pooya87 (#379147) to 1393 unique users in 9588 transactions
21. 22424 Merit sent by dbshck (#153634) to 1314 unique users in 6442 transactions
22. 18490 Merit sent by NotATether (#2739424) to 1800 unique users in 4155 transactions
23. 17127 Merit sent by Julien_Olynpic (#1166480) to 570 unique users in 8056 transactions
24. 16891 Merit sent by Vispilio (#982288) to 754 unique users in 6293 transactions
25. 16791 Merit sent by nutildah (#317618) to 1760 unique users in 7679 transactions
26. 16666 Merit sent by Pmalek (#112493) to 1206 unique users in 9454 transactions
27. 16264 Merit sent by Halab (#1053119) to 2009 unique users in 6612 transactions
28. 15384 Merit sent by Foxpup (#55384) to 647 unique users in 5513 transactions
29. 15237 Merit sent by bitmover (#1554927) to 1336 unique users in 8558 transactions
30. 14703 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 1696 unique users in 7680 transactions
31. 14557 Merit sent by theymos (#35) to 1113 unique users in 1790 transactions
32. 14448 Merit sent by OgNasty (#18321) to 3166 unique users in 7581 transactions
33. 13685 Merit sent by krogothmanhattan (#1000199) to 667 unique users in 3650 transactions
34. 13561 Merit sent by paxmao (#1192397) to 1307 unique users in 5936 transactions
35. 13555 Merit sent by CryptopreneurBrainboss (#1052091) to 1366 unique users in 7501 transactions
36. 13541 Merit sent by dkbit98 (#1410401) to 1158 unique users in 8287 transactions
37. 13434 Merit sent by NeuroticFish (#257071) to 834 unique users in 6301 transactions
38. 13422 Merit sent by BlackHatCoiner (#2775483) to 855 unique users in 4321 transactions
39. 12129 Merit sent by d5000 (#85033) to 1209 unique users in 6615 transactions
40. 12114 Merit sent by chimk (#1202061) to 757 unique users in 4369 transactions
41. 10800 Merit sent by mikeywith (#2033515) to 548 unique users in 3984 transactions
42. 8877 Merit sent by Hueristic (#198573) to 591 unique users in 7512 transactions
43. 8734 Merit sent by DarkStar_ (#507936) to 971 unique users in 2196 transactions
44. 8712 Merit sent by bones261 (#452769) to 1032 unique users in 4239 transactions
45. 8645 Merit sent by Buchi-88 (#204821) to 764 unique users in 7454 transactions
46. 8635 Merit sent by Coolcryptovator (#1980983) to 1065 unique users in 3737 transactions
47. 8602 Merit sent by babo (#65636) to 525 unique users in 6768 transactions
48. 8430 Merit sent by BobLawblaw (#569455) to 333 unique users in 3397 transactions
49. 8271 Merit sent by OmegaStarScream (#375981) to 963 unique users in 3607 transactions
50. 8260 Merit sent by Xal0lex (#1068464) to 678 unique users in 2545 transactions
.......
.......
.......
26689. 1 Merit sent by 3acaga (#1232502) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26690. 1 Merit sent by 360llqzc (#1300924) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26691. 1 Merit sent by 333btc (#3450760) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26692. 1 Merit sent by 3227jw (#2592839) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26693. 1 Merit sent by 2x2coindwarf (#2686612) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26694. 1 Merit sent by 2x25BT (#990097) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26695. 1 Merit sent by 2drive (#1304704) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26696. 1 Merit sent by 2andahalfBTC (#1142164) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26697. 1 Merit sent by 27QVUTZj8rgZP1 (#662730) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26698. 1 Merit sent by 27aume (#1001865) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26699. 1 Merit sent by 2342q6tegw (#1212678) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26700. 1 Merit sent by 214missy (#1285563) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26701. 1 Merit sent by 212fox (#1342293) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26702. 1 Merit sent by 1xbitpatnar (#3475604) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26703. 1 Merit sent by 1r0n (#1252002) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26704. 1 Merit sent by 1pool Ltd. (#2062862) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26705. 1 Merit sent by 1melyun (#543052) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26706. 1 Merit sent by 1cyrax00 (#964210) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26707. 1 Merit sent by 1CryptoSmurf (#1352746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26708. 1 Merit sent by 1chempion123 (#1346880) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26709. 1 Merit sent by 1cak (#1136856) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26710. 1 Merit sent by 1amCrypt0 (#933826) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26711. 1 Merit sent by 19Nov16 (#921267) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26712. 1 Merit sent by 19nataliya12 (#1873934) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26713. 1 Merit sent by 19dimasik77 (#881779) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26714. 1 Merit sent by 1971ECPT (#3553473) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26715. 1 Merit sent by 17buratin (#1187494) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26716. 1 Merit sent by 13ex07 (#1207068) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26717. 1 Merit sent by 13Charlie (#76987) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26718. 1 Merit sent by 12retepnat34 (#1053271) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26719. 1 Merit sent by 10yearsolder (#1094878) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26720. 1 Merit sent by 10sat (#1162504) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26721. 1 Merit sent by 10casproj (#3515598) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26722. 1 Merit sent by 10BTCaDay (#396522) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26723. 1 Merit sent by 100kk (#1316426) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26724. 1 Merit sent by 100eth (#1324600) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26725. 1 Merit sent by 0xBitcoins (#2205183) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26726. 1 Merit sent by 0xBet (#3572636) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26727. 1 Merit sent by 0x0333 (#1913654) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26728. 1 Merit sent by 0vn1 (#1216048) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26729. 1 Merit sent by 0virtual (#1244555) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26730. 1 Merit sent by 0id1d (#3600764) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26731. 1 Merit sent by 0Alvaren0 (#2020991) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26732. 1 Merit sent by 01BTC (#1756786) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26733. 1 Merit sent by 01bits (#1629161) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26734. 1 Merit sent by 00HasH (#841746) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26735. 1 Merit sent by 00DKM@ (#1311705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26736. 1 Merit sent by 00.00WIB (#3392171) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26737. 1 Merit sent by $@to$h! (#1183184) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
26738. 1 Merit sent by $Talker (#1043705) to 1 unique users in 1 transactions
Full list (3 MB)
Merit per day of the weekMonday 342177 (14.39%)
Tuesday 341331 (14.35%)
Wednesday 341301 (14.35%)
Thursday 361733 (15.21%)
Friday 359810 (15.13%)
Saturday 313455 (13.18%)
Sunday 317599 (13.35%)
Total: 2377406
* This file will be overwritten by newer versions
21. Post 67070612 (unedited backup) (by LoyceV) (scraped on Sat Aug 22 15:29:25 CEST 2026) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Update:DT 1 1. 35:
theymos (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (58) 15027 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 11425:
gmaxwell (
Trust: +12 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (16) 10442 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 33156:
vapourminer (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5696 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 55384:
Foxpup (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 2799 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 64507:
philipma1957 (
Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 11342 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 65636:
babo (
Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4781 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 78147:
Cyrus (
Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (21) 2887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 84866:
ibminer (
Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2791 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 85033:
d5000 (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (4) 9993 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 97582:
joker_josue (
Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 6878 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 112493:
Pmalek (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 8955 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 113670:
Mitchell (
Trust: +47 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 2222 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 123824:
albon (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2174 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 131333:
wwzsocki (
Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1526 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 137185:
jeremypwr (
Trust: +58 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (13) 6272 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
16. 140582:
gbianchi (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2610 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
17. 140584:
EFS (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 2179 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
18. 158444:
hybridsole (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 513 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
19. 164749:
stompix (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (11) 6793 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
20. 164822:
hilariousandco (
Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (30) 1950 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
21. 189967:
buckrogers (
Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 196 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. 204821:
Buchi-88 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 2387 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
23. 206143:
Lesbian Cow (
Trust: +45 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 758 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
24. 252510:
JayJuanGee (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 13868 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
25. 257071:
NeuroticFish (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (10) 6272 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
26. 290195:
achow101 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 6791 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
27. 300014:
DaveF (
Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (18) 6937 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
28. 314792:
examplens (
Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (
DT1! (24) 3896 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
29. 317618:
nutildah (
Trust: +21 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (33) 10654 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
30. 350580:
irfan_pak10 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 747 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
31. 355846:
yahoo62278 (
Trust: +40 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (23) 4453 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
32. 364070:
bitbollo (
Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 3978 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
33. 369212:
zazarb (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 548 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
34. 379147:
pooya87 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 11430 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
35. 379487:
LFC_Bitcoin (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 12132 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
36. 395806:
o_solo_miner (
Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 540 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
37. 405464:
mocacinno (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 4540 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
38. 405482:
Real-Duke (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2884 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
39. 407174:
klarki (
Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 4688 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
40. 459836:
LoyceV (
Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (62) 21468 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
41. 521899:
SFR10 (
Trust: +16 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3152 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
42. 533583:
Lucius (
Trust: neutral) (
DT1! (2) 6711 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
43. 805820:
Lafu (
Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 4122 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
44. 830967:
tweetious (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 459 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
45. 839568:
AakZaki (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 2168 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
46. 889300:
giammangiato (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1501 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
47. 901859:
buwaytress (
Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3934 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
48. 914465:
crwth (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (0) 1361 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
49. 932931:
Ale88 (
Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 3688 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
50. 949248:
Kryptowerk (
Trust: +49 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1321 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
51. 995810:
hosemary (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 6947 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
52. 1000199:
krogothmanhattan (
Trust: +96 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 4214 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
53. 1016855:
JollyGood (
Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 2027 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
54. 1045971:
igebotz (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 2332 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
55. 1051955:
roycilik (
Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (
DT1! (1) 1908 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
56. 1052091:
CryptopreneurBrainboss (
Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 5150 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
57. 1059082:
hugeblack (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 4648 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
58. 1067333:
El duderino_ (
Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 15628 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
59. 1097370:
KTChampions (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2346 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
60. 1099980:
Trofo (
Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (14) 3667 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
61. 1137579:
icopress (
Trust: +90 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (39) 13285 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
62. 1190631:
JeromeTash (
Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 1487 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
63. 1247226:
logfiles (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (12) 2386 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
64. 1269497:
Bitcoin_Arena (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 2106 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
65. 1285797:
GazetaBitcoin (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 10112 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
66. 1311641:
tvplus006 (
Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (15) 2657 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
67. 1424178:
mole0815 (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 3628 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
68. 1554927:
bitmover (
Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 7665 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
69. 1582324:
DdmrDdmr (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 11374 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
70. 1827294:
Husna QA (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (5) 3506 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
71. 1836948:
Bthd (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 2626 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
72. 1852120:
fillippone (
Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 21297 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
73. 1862043:
cryptofrka (
Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3058 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
74. 1878246:
abhiseshakana (
Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 2616 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
75. 1980983:
The Cryptovator (
Trust: +20 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (22) 2610 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
76. 1982152:
lovesmayfamilis (
Trust: +28 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (31) 5792 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
77. 2003859:
DireWolfM14 (
Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (17) 5772 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
78. 2015418:
notblox1 (
Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1610 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
79. 2344286:
Little Mouse (
Trust: +52 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 3794 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
80. 2363935:
YOSHIE (
Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (20) 1910 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
81. 2477002:
inspace (
Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1629 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
82. 2497429:
jokers10 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 4166 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
83. 2519096:
Awaklara (
Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 856 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
84. 2652924:
geophphreigh (
Trust: +33 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 1146 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
85. 2654005:
zasad@ (
Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 5747 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
86. 2658890:
Rikafip (
Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (28) 8249 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
87. 2709122:
Etranger (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 1887 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
88. 2739424:
NotATether (
Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 10119 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
89. 2739454:
Stalker22 (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (9) 1637 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
90. 2745549:
decodx (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (8) 963 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
91. 2775483:
BlackHatCoiner (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (6) 10025 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
92. 2776678:
Charles-Tim (
Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (7) 6493 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
93. 2796662:
Lillominato89 (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (4) 1290 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
94. 2836461:
Free Market Capitalist (
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (
DT1! (11) 3613 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
95. 3442614:
YodasRedRocket (
Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (2) 651 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
96. 3519432:
SirJohnVonSlotty (
Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (
DT1! (3) 1022 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
DT 2 1. 3:
satoshi (
Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (
8877 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
2. 4:
sirius (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
935 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
3. 1268:
nanotube (
Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
4. 2252:
laanwj (
Trust: neutral) (
50 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
5. 2676:
casascius (
Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (
193 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
6. 2759:
midnightmagic (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
27 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
7. 2786:
Pieter Wuille (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
203 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
8. 3380:
Vladimir (
Trust: neutral) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
9. 3420:
dooglus (
Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (
335 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
10. 4171:
Raize (
Trust: neutral) (
24 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
11. 4528:
Matt Corallo (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
15 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
12. 6347:
Maged (
Trust: neutral) (
17 Merit earned) (
Custom Trust list) (
BPIP)
13. 6447:
forrestv (
Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (
143 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
14. 7351:
EPiSKiNG (
Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit
earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
15. 10354:
JJG (
Trust: neutral) (
10 Merit earned) (
Trust list) (
BPIP)
22. Post 67069270 (unedited backup) (by jayce) (scraped on Sat Aug 22 02:32:07 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
I was kidding.
CLS63 has a much higher chance to win the first division.
I was also joking. jayce still has a serious chance to get at least 1 point in this round. Therefore I'm going to keep calm until the referee blows the final whistle. Congratulations to the LMS champion el che! It is really a great work to have this achievement 2 times.
Meh, this is not what I expected after wasting sgd 50 on those encyclopedias
sorry guys it's almost impossible to stop cls. And congrats to el che for claiming the lms title over the mafias.
23. Post 67068338 (unedited backup) (by CLS63) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 21:38:31 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
I was kidding.
CLS63 has a much higher chance to win the first division.
I was also joking. jayce still has a serious chance to get at least 1 point in this round. Therefore I'm going to keep calm until the referee blows the final whistle. Congratulations to the LMS champion el che! It is really a great work to have this achievement 2 times.
24. Post 67068279 (unedited backup) (by joker_josue) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 21:26:37 CEST 2026) in Sigbanned user impulse709 owns at least four other accounts. :
they are private name tags to make it easy to keep track of who's who. it's a pretty handy feature on bscscan.
This is on bscscan:
I wish there was a way to export these to Arkham, which is superior as it combines all major blockchains.
From what I know, it's also possible to create tags to identify addresses in Arkham. You have to create an account there.
I don't know if this information will be public or just private.
I get what you mean. I am only showing screenshot evidence without proof of address ownership for each account.
Some of the accounts hosemary spilled, as listed, sent BNB and USDT to the same address 0x12590130142d986539Ed0E7005Fbd98fC94f5571. Same for the two accounts I mentioned.
But how do you know that this address doesn't belong to some external service?
Yes, as a rule, services assign an address to each user and don't always use the same one.
25. Post 67067522 (unedited backup) (by Pmalek) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 17:40:43 CEST 2026) in Paper wallet the only option left?:
Today, you can generate a seed phrase instead of a single private key and write it down on a piece of paper, and I believe this is still a paper wallet.
Any seed generated on an offline computer/device and stored on a piece of paper, metal, or similar surface can be called a paper wallet. If it's generated properly, there is nothing wrong with that. You can even print them as seedQR codes, for example. If the seed never touches an internet-connected device and software than it's a good cold storage example.
26. Post 67067282 (unedited backup) (by slaman29) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 16:27:07 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Great, @vd309, you have a perfect 3 out of 3 and I only managed 1.
vd309 has also secured a point from the fifth question and actually leads you 4-1. This means that the best result you can get this round is a draw.
Yeah, bad round, bad days, bad picks. But at least I survive another season at the top. GG @vd309, a draw is not enough for me to do anything
And well done @hosemary for keeping the title away from mafia hands
27. Post 67067158 (unedited backup) (by CLS63) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 15:47:13 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
What does the AI say about my chances to win the Division title?
Zero.
hosemary will lift the first division trophy.
The funniest post I have seen on the forum in a long time could be this one.
There is a very short time left for me to become the champion officially. In case of seeing over 3.5 goals in the German Super Cup match I will be the champion. After relegating in Season 5 completing Division 1 as the champion in Season 9 will be a great achievement for my team.
28. Post 67067098 (unedited backup) (by Faisal2202) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 15:22:55 CEST 2026) in MoBit.Exchange — NO KYC/AML Crypto Swap| Fast | Secure | 0.25 BTC Escrow :
What LOG are you talking about? I see they claim not to have logs, but if it's true, how does the track order work then? Of course they have the logs of the orders. I can still enter my order ID and see my order, tx has, deposit address, the letter of the guarantee, etc. So, the no logs is actually "not" no logs. Or I failed to understand what they meant by no logs. Nothing happened, as I said before. There was some delay from their part, but I received my XMR. The tx showed up after 35 minutes.
My bad, I should have written the full form. LOG meant to say Letter of Guarantee (thanks hosemary, for your reply). In it, we can see when our deal is going to expire, although if a timer is mentioned on the deal page as well, then that would be a lot better, really. But still, what I meant to say is, when a deal is about to end, like if its time is 35 minutes or whatever, then maybe a normal practice exchange has a script for rechecking whether the TX even took place or not. So after the window is cleared, the exchange's backup script checks that, and that was the one that confirmed your TX instead of the main process or script which was supposed to.
Which is my assumption on the basis of what I learned. There is still some room for improvements, and the openness of the MobitExchange toward such suggestions and clearance of confusion of the customer is going to take them to new heights very soon. BTW, their traffic is already improving.
29. Post 67066289 (unedited backup) (by Awaklara) (scraped on Fri Aug 21 09:30:37 CEST 2026) in Sigbanned user impulse709 owns at least four other accounts. :
How did you manage to connect those addresses to those users?
When I click on the link, I don't see their names...
I get what you mean. I am only showing screenshot evidence without proof of address ownership for each account.
Some of the accounts hosemary spilled, as listed, sent BNB and USDT to the same address 0x12590130142d986539Ed0E7005Fbd98fC94f5571. Same for the two accounts I mentioned.
BEP-20 Wallet Address. 0xFFA6097E3Bbe793F82115D3d2E344CbcE0BeB476
BSC Wallet Address: 0xEc0a7D526819ef1D998C4Dca0e5a6e9846480F67
Wallet AdAddress : 0x98faf60382D30bB72512D90Cb96EF7FB97791552
Wallet Address: 0x23B1045494C6A15fd8b6894Fb77489d5592B24f9
Did Mamun74 get past the SCORAS detection system?
30. Post 67065285 (unedited backup) (by Awaklara) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 23:24:13 CEST 2026) in Sigbanned user impulse709 owns at least four other accounts. :
Is the
Mamun74 account also part of this farm? That account woke up a few days ago and then applied in the SCORAS thread. I tracked the address and connected it to some of the accounts you found.
https://bscscan.com/txs?a=0x12590130142d986539ed0e7005fbd98fc94f5571
The account
tami40 also woke up today. That account is connected with the account
tamim60.
https://bscscan.com/tx/0x6a61d7b7c177361b3fe949a0c7852127fe096a393bb5b961b73d938a522d52c3
See how that account got 9 Merits from the bounty report post.
This farm is pretty big, some low ranking accounts are inactive.
31. Post 67065069 (unedited backup) (by cryptofrka) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 22:21:32 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
@cryptofrka
You will win the LMS if Corinthians doesn't win, Mercedes doesn't get the most constructor points, Newcastle doesn't lose, their match has over 2.5 goals, and one of the following scenarios happens.
- Anderlecht wins, both teams score in the LDU vs Mirassol match, Falcons reaches the grand final and Liquid doesn't.
- Kairat wins, both teams score in the LDU vs Mirassol match, Neither Falcons nor Liquid reach the grand final.
- Kairat wins, both teams don't score in the LDU vs Mirassol match, Spirit reaches the grand final, both Falcons and Liquid fail.
In all scenrios, you will share the first prize with someone else.
Came home after a few beers, already started to hedge the Corinthians win and then you lost me somewhere along the way
I'll still do it just for fun but not for huge stakes.
What does the AI say about my chances to win the title? If even possible odds must be insanely high but then again..
32. Post 67063938 (unedited backup) (by Trofo) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 16:20:07 CEST 2026) in Italian Serie A Football Pool Discussion Thread:
Tagging past participants for this
Don't send money just yet, join if you are interested, if there is 10+ people we are paying. If not we will let it rest for a season. But if you join, I am expecting you to pay if we go on.
Link are in the op.
cryptofrka
morvillz7z
LTU_btc
darxiaomi
slaman29
paco92x
Renato297
hosemary
CLS63
jeremypwr
Leea-1334
Harkorede
Kanapka
KTChampions
Spack17
buwaytress
bitgrudge
strongkored
SaintLoup
ovcijisir
brooksby
mitchr4
slissy
el che
33. Post 67062430 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Thu Aug 20 03:11:49 CEST 2026) in Sigbanned user impulse709 owns at least four other accounts. :
[----]
Looking at these names, it looks like real Bengali names like mine. I have mistakenly used a name, and I cannot change it anymore. But looking at the list you prepared, it seems they have used their nephews, brothers, and children's names to register accounts. What a dumb way to ruin the accounts. I assume they were making money with some of these accounts by participating in signature campaigns, but they were not happy with the amount and decided to cheat in the casinos and make some extra bucks.
It is good that they ended up being caught and their accounts do not have any value anymore. I have started to think that at least 25% of active forum accounts operate from my country
34. Post 67062013 (unedited backup) (by el che) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 23:56:55 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
I wrote some python codes (without any help from AI), and did some calculations for LMS.
According to my calculations, Trofo now has no chance of winning the LMS.
If Anderlecht wins, el che and Heyshbosh will have no chance of winning the LMS.
If Anderlecht's match ends in a draw, crpytofrka and goodpunt will have no chance of winning the LMS.
Can you confirm these, el che?
As of now, this is how things stand. You're right about Trofo, but I'm not so sure about the other possibilities. I picked Anderlecht to win, so I'm not sure how that outcome would eliminate me.
I'll refresh the thread with an updated probability breakdown for every player after tonight's Libertadores matches.
| Player | Current Pts | Outright Win % (Odds) | Tied 1st % | Total 1st % (Win or Tie) | Decimal Odds |
| el che | 71 | 49.15% (2.03) | 16.15% | 65.30% | 1.53 |
| Heyshbosh | 70 | 23.81% (4.20) | 12.78% | 36.59% | 2.73 |
| vd309 | 69 | 4.56% (21.93) | 8.20% | 12.76% | 7.84 |
| cryptofrka | 68 | 1.69% (59.17) | 2.21% | 3.91% | 25.60 |
| goodpunt | 69 | 0.72% (138.89) | 1.11% | 1.82% | 54.86 |
| leea-1334 | 65 | 0.46% (217.39) | 0.00% | 0.46% | 219.43 |
| Trofo | 68 | 0.00% (Eliminated) | 0.00% | 0.00% | N/A |
35. Post 67060991 (unedited backup) (by arallmuus) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 18:46:13 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
arallmuus does have a chance to qualify for the first divsion.
There will be a play-off match between the 4th place player in Division 2 and 15th place player in Division 1.
Atleast hosemary AI helps out on this, we can really count you on answering questions regarding rules and such
So, he's going to the play-off, but before that happens, the captain must first defeat our team in the final round which is not something easy. So, @arallmuus, don't get your hopes up that your team will even make it to the play-off.
On top of winning against you, I need the 3 other players to either lose or draw on their rounds which was why I stated that my chances are
super slim. Probably less than 2% to get all the conditions right then even so its still better than having no chance at all
BTW, I was surprised to see that we gave the same answer for the Fenerbahçe match question
Lyon is pretty good on dragging their games so it was obvious choice to go with No there. We got 2 games tonight, I hedged them just in case
36. Post 67060826 (unedited backup) (by SCORAS) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 18:03:02 CEST 2026) in Sigbanned user impulse709 owns at least four other accounts. :
End of the day, you definitely will make some mistakes and be punished as well.
He did make the mistake by multi-accounting in Scoras casino.
According to
SCORAS' report in another thread, one of the alts is
rojan.
I tried to find more of alts by linking them to rojan, and found out the farm is very very big. Many have already been caught, and there are probably many accounts that haven't been identified yet.
A farm consisting of 18 accounts was found by FatFork around five years ago, and
another farm consisting of 14 accounts was found by PrivacyG around four years ago.
Those two farms and the one I reported in the OP are actually the same farm, and the following accounts should be added to the list as well.
Proof:preikaler and shawon01 both used the address bc1q38gr6x0wds4h2yfcta9f2cnv8x6qahlzyae8kv, and the sent funds to 3AJEiMusrAX5vb4Mj7JbTrVjTPZ1XRpCGP (a deposit address in a custodial service) in
this transaction.
rojan owns bc1qfn677dkq05w5q4cpeard8a8w4tgv4x5896cl09 and sent funds to the same deposit address in
this transaction.
BTC Address: bc1q38gr6x0wds4h2yfcta9f2cnv8x6qahlzyae8kv
Btc Address: bc1q38gr6x0wds4h2yfcta9f2cnv8x6qahlzyae8kv
Bech32 BTC address: bc1qfn677dkq05w5q4cpeard8a8w4tgv4x5896cl09
preikaler, CPNpr, vpn@675 and ssakil all both used the address bc1qejv7j7hha9q6cx67u6zhuywxdxx84enduqv8tc.
BTC Address: bc1qejv7j7hha9q6cx67u6zhuywxdxx84enduqv8tc
Btc Address: bc1qejv7j7hha9q6cx67u6zhuywxdxx84enduqv8tc
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qejv7j7hha9q6cx67u6zhuywxdxx84enduqv8tc
Your correct BTC Address: bc1qejv7j7hha9q6cx67u6zhuywxdxx84enduqv8tc
preikaler and tamim60 both used the address 0xAe4caCdD96475d3C764ed91423E7eB98A4372fC2.
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0xAe4caCdD96475d3C764ed91423E7eB98A4372fC2
ETH Wallet Address : 0xAe4caCdD96475d3C764ed91423E7eB98A4372fC2
preikaler, mafoja1 and rosiia all used the address 1ANLjELCzZb1Px7UWYi8UE5uChpBNVPHfB.
Btc Address: 1ANLjELCzZb1Px7UWYi8UE5uChpBNVPHfB
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 1ANLjELCzZb1Px7UWYi8UE5uChpBNVPHfB
Your correct BTC Address: 1ANLjELCzZb1Px7UWYi8UE5uChpBNVPHfB
shawon01 owns 0x5B6E5D2c2296B450582B400ffee3c9535a5e2B9d, and made a
transaction to 0xAC98ca0b9f8d329D166Cf4fdC8205795F6f06E03 which is owned by sifat08.
BSC Address: 0x5B6E5D2c2296B450582B400ffee3c9535a5e2B9d
Bep-20 address: 0xAC98ca0b9f8d329D166Cf4fdC8205795F6f06E03
Alamin9884 owns 0x660c37A41998F153AF40c0BEbeF8A0473A449fD5 and made a transaction to 0xEc0a7D526819ef1D998C4Dca0e5a6e9846480F67 which is owned by tamim60.
BSC address : 0x660c37A41998F153AF40c0BEbeF8A0473A449fD5
BSC Wallet Address: 0xEc0a7D526819ef1D998C4Dca0e5a6e9846480F67
aslam86, aslam120 and aslam121 all used the address 0x5aBE1452bC50518B45d0bA0C3c62b5539c7D8A81 and sent funds to 0xEc0a7D526819ef1D998C4Dca0e5a6e9846480F67 which is owned by tamim60.
- ETH address. 0x5aBE1452bC50518B45d0bA0C3c62b5539c7D8A81
ETH Address: 0x5aBE1452bC50518B45d0bA0C3c62b5539c7D8A81
ETH Address: 0x5aBE1452bC50518B45d0bA0C3c62b5539c7D8A81
Thank you for taking the time to dig into this and connect the accounts. We will always have your back when it comes to exposing this kind of abuse.
We actually have a couple of additional cases involving other users that came up during bonus disputes. Until now, I honestly didn't feel like posting every single case publicly, because I didn't want to turn everything into accusations and drama.
However, I'm starting to think that documenting these cases properly may be the right thing to do.
At the end of the day, multi-accounting and account farming have a real cost. It costs us money through promotions, bonuses, and campaigns, and I'm sure the same applies to many other casinos and advertisers operating on BitcoinTalk.
Campaigns and promotions should benefit real, individual users who genuinely participate in the community and use the platforms—not farms of accounts controlled by the same people repeatedly collecting rewards.
We are happy to reward genuine players, and we expect bonus abuse from time to time; that's part of operating a casino. But organized multi-accounting is different. It doesn't only affect SCORAS—it takes opportunities and campaign funds away from legitimate members of the community.
So going forward, when we have strong and properly documented evidence of this type of abuse, I think it makes sense for us to share it with the community rather than simply keeping it internally.
Again, thank you for putting the time into investigating this. It is genuinely helpful for us and, I believe, for other casinos and campaign managers as well.
37. Post 67060762 (unedited backup) (by MAAManda) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 17:44:37 CEST 2026) in ⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 5000+$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐:
Guys, the sponsorship fee for season 10 hasw been received. Therefore, all buyins and prizes for Season 10 will be calculated according to BTC price at time of receiving the funds.
The budget is 9200$ (141.6 mBTC), with an additional ~3700$ in freebets. We'll make the calculations at the end of the season because the penalties are also a part of the budget.
LFG!!!
arallmuus does have a chance to qualify for the first divsion.
There will be a play-off match between the 4th place player in Division 2 and 15th place player in Division 1.
Yeah, It turns out I really did miss something. So, he's going to the play-off, but before that happens, the captain must first defeat our team in the final round which is not something easy. So, @arallmuus, don't get your hopes up that your team will even make it to the play-off.
38. Post 67059322 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Wed Aug 19 09:23:37 CEST 2026) in Paper wallet the only option left?:
This guy is now talking about using a separate iPhone for hardware wallet only use case, do you think that he has a point here?
I'm surprised nobody mention "price" or "cost" of iPhone, which is more expensive than hardware wallet or basic computer/laptop. Other already argue why hardware wallet is still better, but basic computer/laptop are also have more configurable for security purpose.
Bitaddress generates the keys through javascript, and I don't recommed it.
Read
gmaxwell's post on another thread. It explains why it's not a good idea to use Javascript to generate a private key.
As reminder, Bitaddress also use text you entered and mouse movement as inputs. The non-obvious part is how those inputs used or processed.
On side note, does anyone know modern or non-JS alternative of bitaddress.org that are popular enough? While you can easily find newer website or code, it's hard to tell how secure or popular is it.