If you expand it to 1 year, he is the 13th most active poster on the Gambling board but 54th in merits earned on that board. To me that suggests his posts (in general) aren't particularly informative or interesting to most readers.


Because this account is particularly lacking in certain areas. They use the same words to describe the same or similar concepts, repeatedly -- for years now, living almost entirely in threads where not many people appear to be reading much of anything.

Nobody should be "free to spam." If you'd like, PM me some examples of accounts you think are clearly spammers that haven't been sigbanned yet.


Here's a list of the top 60 merit earners on the Gambling board over the last 365 days so people can evaluate the data themselves:

1 - JackpotterCasino: 195 merits
2 - Zwei: 136 merits
3 - Rainbet: 134 merits
4 - sportsbet.io: 124 merits
5 - notblox1: 105 merits
6 - SirJohnVonSlotty: 93 merits
7 - buwaytress: 91 merits
8 - memehunter: 81 merits
9 - goodpunt: 78 merits
10 - Mahdirakib: 75 merits
11 - Pmalek: 72 merits
12 - SamReomo: 66 merits
13 - Harkorede: 63 merits
14 - @Whale: 59 merits
15 - Betpanda: 54 merits
16 - TheOriginals: 54 merits
17 - jeremypwr: 54 merits
18 - BetFury.io: 53 merits
19 - Betwrong: 53 merits
20 - Bitz_Casino: 51 merits
21 - SpongeS: 50 merits
22 - panjul07: 50 merits
23 - AB de Royse777: 49 merits
24 - bitmover: 48 merits
25 - Spinly: 45 merits
26 - yahoo62278: 45 merits
27 - 1win.global: 42 merits
28 - BABY SHOES: 42 merits
29 - AHOYBRAUSE: 37 merits
30 - slaman29: 37 merits
31 - Haunebu: 35 merits
32 - dewez: 34 merits
33 - salad daging: 34 merits
34 - 2UP.io: 32 merits
35 - hosemary: 31 merits
36 - EOSBet: 30 merits
37 - victorhing: 30 merits
38 - Bspin_io: 29 merits
39 - EarnOnVictor: 28 merits
40 - Monarch-: 28 merits
41 - iv4n: 28 merits
42 - xLays: 28 merits
43 - efialtis: 26 merits
44 - leea-1334: 26 merits
45 - Allstars.io Team: 25 merits
46 - Free Market Capitalist: 25 merits
47 - Little Mouse: 25 merits
48 - Slissy: 25 merits
49 - julerz12: 25 merits
50 - rohang: 25 merits
51 - LFC_Bitcoin: 24 merits
52 - famososMuertos: 24 merits
53 - 96OFFICIAL: 23 merits
54 - Bitinity: 23 merits
55 - Upgrade00: 23 merits
56 - duelbits: 23 merits
57 - Potato Chips: 22 merits
58 - xandry: 22 merits
59 - Pseudo-Random: 21 merits
60 - Trofo: 21 merits

Yes, I think you're right

Yep exactly, I think OP need to know that just because instant swap doesn't require KYC, doesn't mean they're as decentralized as AMM based swap that purely runs on code. Some instant swap out there are processed through their centralized service, the service itself become market maker unlike AMM pool where everybody can create one and supply liquidity.

Few example of swaps that runs on code are Uniswap, curve, and Thorchain swap. They can't freeze anything and swap happen instantly.

Have seen several cases of scams that filed his on the forums, after they did instant swaps in large quantities... suddenly stuck waiting for weeks and even months, I think other reasons have been mentioned by some people here.

Or what is meant by exchanges such as Binance, Kucoin, OKX as recipients of these funds must be careful, these exchanges are now strict against deposits from instant swaps.

How does an instant exchange in requesting KYC to its customers? Is it done through the platform or requested by email to send it?
So far I have not been, but would like to know just the mechanism.

Damn.. I did think about this but I just felt it wasn't the case even if I thought it probably had something to do with the servers and yeah you are correct it can broadcast less than a sat/vbyte but funnily although I've been using it quite long now I've barely made any broadcast less than a sat/vbyte mostly because the fees are still way small.

I'll try switching to see if there's really a difference in the sync time.

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

Courtesy tag for those who love free bets

I got one recently and decided to try it and yeah I dont mind waiting I guess



No guarantee they are going to win but why not. Atleast now we know it can be used on outrights, I was always wondering this then somehow I forgot to test it out when I got one


Confirmed this on my latest free bets. 1.8x minimum and 3.5x maximum and 700 days to use it. Im thinking of starting to pile it up for the whole year to see how many I will get in the end


ATP and even WTA huh somehow this reminds me of how cro2 mafia bet, they seems fond betting on that weird women tennis. Imagine that your bet ruined by the WTA 1.15x odds game

Yeah i actually did made the last statement that the OP needs two seed phrases and the master public keys to able to recover the wallet which will be enough to spend from the 2 -of - 3 multi sig wallet.

The reason why I actually did go round for the three wallet is just to tell the OP how to recover all the three wallet if there need be but it’s not a necessity while trying to spend from this multi sig type of wallet.

While I added that he need three public keys was because we don’t know which seed phrase was lost. But you have corrected that mistake that it’s not all necessary having all three available. Since the master public key can be generated from the seed phrase, although I do think it’s best to actually back up everyone still along side the seed phrases.

da es von Lafu leider für die monate juli, august und september keine updates gab, aber dieses thema doch aktuell bleiben sollte, möchte ich ihn etwas unter die arme greifen und euch wenigstens das update für den monat oktober veröffentlichen
im oktober waren 116 user berechtigt in die dt-liste mit aufgenommen zu werden:

alte dt1-liste:

neue dt1-liste:

aus unserem deutschsprachigen bereich sind insgesamt 10 leute vertreten: Buchi-88, willi9974, o_solo_miner, Real-Duke, Lafu, mole0815, Lakai01, efialtis, bullrun2024bro und AHOYBRAUSE
hier ist nochmal der original beitrag von theymos: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg67198109#msg67198109

wer genau rausgeflogen ist und wer dafür neu aufgenommen wurde, dies könnt ihr aus dieser liste entnehmen - hier hat es leider qwk und d5000 getroffen:

That's a good guess actually.

Since he mentioned "sometimes" and Electrum always flag its transactions as replaceable, so no need for full-rbf enabled servers.
It must be Electrum's rbf fee calculation issue (that is limited by its SPV design):
Electrum just fails to calculate the correct additional fee in instances where the transaction has more than one descendants, it can only count the fees of the to-be-evicted transactions that it knows.
So during broadcast to server, it'll fail to satisfy condition 3 even though the user used its suggested new fee rate.

I think 30 days is going to work fine for me, but more months would be better.

This is one thing I would like to see improved in Jackpotter, but I don't think they are process withdrawals in the same speed for all customers.
I think I talked with one member with account in Jackpotter and he told me withdrawals are always very fast for him.
Being patient is always good, and talking with support can sometimes speed things up.

Free bets have been credited to your Rainbet accounts   

Good luck guys!

Oops, overlooked telegram ping, yes, received, valid until October 8th!

If AI does't lie, Freebitco.in is blocked in Australia too, while from posts here we know that they're blocked in Netherlands in Germany. Usually I'm against such blocking, but maybe this time it saved at least several people from falling into this scam.

But in general I don't agree with words ''Lucky are those residing in countries where everything online should be locally regulated.'' Nope, they just force me to change DNS, use VPn and use other things to bypass stupid restrictions.

Well, I know Netherland is not the only exception. What I wanted to say is that users from countries where online gambling activities are regulated by some authorities will see a message according to the reaction of their authorities over the site status. And as the website is shut down, users from other countries where nothing is regulated, they will see that host error from cloudflare.

Thank you for detailed explanation.

By the way, I'd like to ask you one question about Replace By Fee. Sometimes, I can bump the fee rate of my pending transactions. Some other times, I can not bump the fee. I don't remember the exact message from Electrum but it's like the server does not allow me to bump fee, something like this.

Is it like Bitcoin nodes can customize their node settings and allow Bitcoin users to bump fee rate or don't allow it?

My mistake, it should be while recovering first wallet, second wallet and third wallet each with there respective seed phrases

These should now be on your accounts. Sorry for the delay and let us know in case there are some issues with the freebets.

Quick suggestion - check these soonish, they usually have short expiration dates.

Probably mentioned it here a couple of times but can't find it unless some guy like @hosemary digs up my posts but yes, there is a slight delay here compared to others. I'm usually using BEP for the low cost.

IIRC even once over 24 hours despite approval, but they admitted it was a technical issue and I got it right after support spoke.

I don't find this a problem, but I can see people are starting to get annoyed at the wait. Might actually be better if JP publishes a timeframe for withdrawal.

Quite a low scoring round for the Nations League goalfest promo, I should have predicted that since usually the first few games are a blast and then the next are not. England helping themselves to 7 goals was the only big blowout, a lot of others didn't even score in the 3rd round.

BTW I was rubbing my eyes in disbelief reading that Haiti and Curacao are in QFs of Nations League, but found out that was CONCACAF Nations League lol



Thank you I wish I had someone like you to manage my life, a few weeks ago I had to dig so hard to find out which pool it was I didn't pay for, because I didn't even keep my own records, in the end found it, but took me way longer than I needed to!

That's great to know and thanks for pointing it out. I didn't know Electrum made that change and simplified the sending of sub 1 sat/vByte transactions. I will edit my OP and mention it. Charles-Tim's post isn't clear. Do you know if sub 1 sat/vByte transactions are supported on Electrum's mobile app or not?

I think he's just adding a note about when it's implement on the Android version of Electrum
but somehow made his post look like going against yours due to the words that he's used, specially that first part.

It is because you are using desktop Electrum for transactions will be the reason you did not know early. It was also not possible on mobile Electrum before, but version 4.7.0 supported it, the time it also supported fee customization. So far you connected to the node that is supporting it, the transaction will be sent.

That's great, if only the newer versions of Electrum didn't have minimum system requirements above what some of us actually have.

That's great, if only the newer versions of Electrum didn't have minimum system requirements above what we actually have.

That manual intervention though might come from them and they'll still do the swap although it's not specified if it's from the user who wants to continue the process or not if given the option to proceed or not. But I guess the main point is to send only exact amount and manually calculate everything on our side including the fees so that there won't be any delays or problems.

Thanks! I thought that they're like the other swaps that the exchange will go on and will adjust automatically. This is a good clarification and a reminder to everyone to just send exact amounts when doing a swap with baltex. I am not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing but it make us more responsible to look at the transaction before proceeding so that no exceeding or lacking with the amount to be sent.

Well i waited 12-13 hours and cancelled it and lost.

Dont think ill play here again, IMO there is no point of using crypto in 2026 and still half a day or more for withdraws. When almost every other legit crypto site will do that in few mins

For me right now there are very few reasons to continue here

10 consecutive daily login huh, I just got them today



Imagine getting the cosmic box


The same guy that listed $50 free bet for $46 offer is still there though, scroll down abit on the free bet marketplace tab




I doubt that you wont be getting new daily boxes after you start depositing but even if you dont then perhaps start few wager with your deposit then you should get them. One of the way to get the boxes are from betting / wagering

Nations league is finally ending and as a Croat, it will be the one to forget as soon as possible.
BSFL moves on, luckily with some proper football to look forward to.

____________________________________________________________

The questions for Round 5 are here!

The deadline is Tuesday October 6th, 17:00 GMT (forum time).

Final round of the Nations League, regular football, WTA tennis and that computer scam of a sport.

Round 5 - Scheduling

_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________
Division 1 crowolf vs Trofo slaman29 vs Spack17 Renato297 vs goodpunt icopress vs cryptofrka Saint-loup vs vd309 ralle14 vs el che jayce vs darxiaomi Jinetics1111 vs hosemary ulven vs Rikafip	Division 2 leea-1334 vs Igebotz VashaUdacha777 vs MAAManda Harkorede vs slackovic arallmuus vs Hhampuz paco92x vs notblox1 mv1986 vs LTU_btc HomieAllDay vs chi20 vivekdkhyani vs buwaytress strongkored vs imarios	Division 3 Ozymandias_DZ vs mitchr4 Kokee44 vs Heyshbosh Dittoup vs Nheer LFC_Bitcoin vs entebah Smartvirus vs russeras B1g4udge vs cygan Ochan_yazo_tochant vs General_Bitcoin hakan2217 vs EarnOnVictor ajanwalker vs Koal-84	Division 4 Asiska02 vs Bitcoin Smith BABY SHOES vs Zaguru12 pina_pino vs Daniel91 Rruchi man vs yassinmanai jeremypwr vs Da_Silva welovebit vs red4slash xLays vs Bitcoin_Budha un_rank vs Dump3er ovcijisir vs Ryu_Ar1

Div 4 news
jeremypwr and yassinmanai are out, all their previous results have been recorded as 3:0 wins for their opponents and their negative points have been removed. This season I will not add future results at this moment, they will be added as 3:0 when every round comes. The way I was doing it before gives AI a lot of problems and even though our original site is back up, I want to have it error proof for the future in case it is needed.

You don't have to submit when playing against people removed from BSFL, you are auto gettign 3:0 result. You do have to submit if you are still in LMS or want to fight for round free bets

Div 1 news
Someone could be mystified by a draw shown in the table for icopress and Spack17. No other way for us to track it and to offset that one point earned from draw they have both gotten another penalty point in addition to the one proscribed by the rules. It has always been done like this in the past, just not that recently so refreshing your memories a bit In other words, table is perfect, they just 1 more match logged as draw instead of loss, but points are correct.

---

In other news it sure is nice to be the only team that didn't drop points this season, and having 5 points gap on top of the LMS. Come on opposition, do something  

---

Division 1

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	Trofo	4	4	0	0	25	14	11	12
2	slaman29	4	3	1	0	18	12	6	10
3	goodpunt	4	3	1	0	16	12	4	10
4	cryptofrka	4	3	0	1	16	15	1	9
5	hosemary	4	2	1	1	14	13	1	7
6	el che	4	2	1	1	17	17	0	7
7	Saint-loup	4	2	1	1	18	20	-2	7
8	darxiaomi	4	2	0	2	18	14	4	6
9	ralle14	4	2	0	2	16	16	0	6
10	Jinetics1111	4	1	2	1	17	15	2	5
11	vd309	4	1	1	2	18	18	0	4
12	Rikafip	4	1	1	2	16	18	-2	4
13	crowolf	4	1	1	2	17	20	-3	4
14	Renato297	4	1	0	3	18	18	0	3
15	jayce	4	1	0	3	15	20	-5	3
16	ulven	4	0	1	3	12	22	-10	1
17	Spack17	4	0	2	2	11	14	-3	0
18	icopress	4	0	1	3	10	14	-4	-1

---

Division 2

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	mv1986	4	3	1	0	19	15	4	10
2	buwaytress	4	3	0	1	17	13	4	9
3	Harkorede	4	2	2	0	19	15	4	8
4	chi20	4	2	1	1	20	11	9	7
5	notblox1	4	2	1	1	14	10	4	7
6	LTU_btc	4	2	1	1	14	14	0	7
7	Igebotz	4	1	3	0	18	16	2	6
8	arallmuus	4	2	0	2	15	13	2	6
9	imarios	4	2	0	2	15	13	2	6
10	vivekdkhyani	4	2	0	2	18	18	0	6
11	MAAManda	4	2	0	2	15	17	-2	6
12	leea-1334	4	1	2	1	15	13	2	5
13	VashaUdacha777	4	1	2	1	19	18	1	5
14	slackovic	4	1	1	2	14	17	-3	4
15	paco92x	4	0	2	2	13	18	-5	2
16	HomieAllDay	4	1	0	3	12	17	-5	2
17	Hhampuz	4	0	1	3	11	17	-6	1
18	strongkored	4	0	1	3	11	24	-13	1

---

Division 3

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	Koal-84	4	3	1	0	19	13	6	10
2	Ozymandias_DZ	4	3	0	1	17	11	6	9
3	LFC_Bitcoin	4	3	0	1	18	13	5	9
4	russeras	4	3	0	1	17	13	4	9
5	Heyshbosh	4	2	1	1	19	15	4	7
6	General_Bitcoin	4	2	1	1	17	15	2	7
7	Nheer	4	2	1	1	17	15	2	7
8	B1g4udge	4	2	0	2	17	21	-4	6
9	hakan2217	4	1	2	1	16	15	1	5
10	ajanwalker	4	1	2	1	15	15	0	5
11	mitchr4	4	1	2	1	11	14	-3	5
12	Smartvirus	4	1	1	2	13	11	2	4
13	cygan	4	1	1	2	14	15	-1	4
14	Kokee44	4	1	1	2	14	18	-4	4
15	EarnOnVictor	4	1	0	3	16	17	-1	3
16	Dittoup	4	1	1	2	11	12	-1	3
17	entebah	4	0	1	3	14	21	-7	1
18	Ochan_yazo_tochant	4	0	1	3	9	20	-11	1

---

Division 4

•POS•	••Username••••	•PLD•	•W•	•D•	•L•	•SF•	•SA•	•SD•	•PTS•
1	Da_Silva	4	3	1	0	21	12	9	10
2	Bitcoin_Budha	4	3	1	0	17	8	9	10
3	pina_pino	4	3	1	0	16	9	7	10
4	welovebit	4	3	1	0	17	11	6	10
5	BABY SHOES	4	3	0	1	16	11	5	9
6	Bitcoin Smith	4	2	1	1	13	8	5	7
7	red4slash	4	2	1	1	17	14	3	7
8	Zaguru12	4	2	1	1	15	12	3	7
9	Asiska02	4	2	0	2	14	13	1	6
10	Daniel91	4	2	0	2	15	16	-1	6
11	xLays	4	1	2	1	17	14	3	5
12	Ryu_Ar1	4	1	2	1	14	13	1	5
13	Dump3er	4	1	2	1	16	17	-1	4
14	un_rank	4	1	0	3	11	16	-5	3
15	ovcijisir	4	0	0	4	9	21	-12	0
16	jeremypwr	4	0	0	4	0	12	-12	0
17	yassinmanai	4	0	0	4	0	12	-12	0
18	Rruchi man	4	0	1	3	6	15	-9	-1

---

W - Games Won, L - Games Lost, D - Games Drawn
POS - League Position, SD - Score Difference, SF - Score For
SA - Score Against, PLD - Games Played, PTS - Points Earned

---

---

Round 4 - Results

_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________	_______________________________
Division 1 slaman29 5-5 crowolf Trofo 6-5 Renato297 Spack17 0-0 icopress goodpunt 6-6 Saint-loup cryptofrka 5-3 ralle14 vd309 7-4 jayce el che 4-4 Jinetics1111 darxiaomi 7-3 ulven hosemary 3-3 Rikafip	Division 2 VashaUdacha777 5-5 leea-1334 Igebotz 4-4 Harkorede MAAManda 5-4 arallmuus slackovic 4-4 paco92x Hhampuz 2-4 mv1986 notblox1 3-0 HomieAllDay LTU_btc 3-5 vivekdkhyani chi20 7-1 strongkored buwaytress 6-4 imarios	Division 3 Kokee44 4-7 Ozymandias_DZ mitchr4 5-4 Dittoup Heyshbosh 4-5 LFC_Bitcoin Nheer 3-2 Smartvirus entebah 4-6 B1g4udge russeras 6-2 Ochan_yazo_tochant cygan 3-5 hakan2217 General_Bitcoin 4-6 ajanwalker EarnOnVictor 3-4 Koal-84	Division 4 BABY SHOES 5-3 Asiska02 Bitcoin Smith 3-4 pina_pino Zaguru12 3-0 Rruchi man Daniel91 3-0 jeremypwr yassinmanai 0-3 welovebit Da_Silva 6-5 xLays red4slash 7-2 un_rank Bitcoin_Budha 4-2 ovcijisir Dump3er 5-5 Ryu_Ar1

[/list]

BaltEX.io, please check and correct the icon of Robinhood's network. It is the same as Ethereum, while it should be a feather kind. Like a green feather.



Thanks for the correction, I was reading them all but failed to see where I am at haha, as this exchange has so many features/pages unlike others.

I do that with default settings and the lowest I can go is 1 sat/vb but I am on a pretty old version of Electrum, so maybe I can if I update it to the latest one, I guess. But if it is just one click like the usual, then it is great.

Making Bitcoin transactions with fee rate under 1 sat/vbyte requires a little bit technical practice and there are guides on it. If don't do some technical steps, Electrum wallet only accept fee rates from 1 sat.vbyte and above.

How to make a bitcoin transaction and pay less than 1 sat/vByte
LoyceV's 0.1 sat/vbyte Electrum Server Adventure

Yeah, almost every mining pool accepts tx less than 1sat/vb but we still don't have any wallet that allows user to send tx less than 1sat/vb by default, if I am not wrong and we have work a little bit to send 0.3sat/vb txs, good for consolidations but still 1sat is a lot cheaper than how much we used to pay even with less congestion.

I concluded that the message also informing us that we are required to have at least a deposit in the last 30 days in order to be eligible for the mystery box, I can be wrong ofc.
I made a new deposit (bigger amount than the min amount in the message) some time ago, lets see whether or not there will be new mystery boxes for me starting from tomorrow.
Lets say there will be no new mystery boxes for me, means that my conclusion is wrong and it will be another question about how to get/activate the mystery boxes from daily login?

So it is actually the answer why we do not receive mystery boxes again, my last deposit was on August 4th while the my last mystery box was on September 4th (exact 30days).
It is reasonable to add this rule indeed because maybe there were too many abuse with the mystery boxes as it was too easy to earn the mystery boxes for free and maybe some users managed to take an advantage from the free mystery boxes so they have to add a new rule.

Your link isn't the most recent block now. It points to block #969766 and this was the chaintip at the time of your post. Things from the past don't necessarily work to predict the nearest future.

While it may be interesting to look at some of the last mined blocks, I look at the current candidate block and the transaction fee histogram of it to make an assessment what feerate I have to choose for a rather fast confirmation.

If a transaction isn't that urgent, I will look at a few more candidate blocks in the queue of pending to be mined blocks, like 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th or 5^th block in queue.

Before sub-1sat/vB feerates became "normal" there were times with some really heavy mempool congestion and painfully high feerates for modestly quick tx confirmation. I don't like to have to pay more than say 10sat/vB or even beyond 100sat/vB, but those high feerate times were rare and ususally didn't last too long.

Nowadays we have a mild congestion of around 80k transactions pending, worth of around 40-41 blocks space. Currently the majority of ~44k transactions are in the feerate band of 0.10-0.21 sat/vB, ~15.3k transactions in the feerate band of 0.21-0.25 sat/vB, that's roughly 75% of all pending transactions at 0.25 and below sat/vB.

Right now at the moment paying a feerate of 0.33-0.35 sat/vB gets your tx almost certainly confirmed in the next block. But this can change, the mempool is dynamic and block production time is random and only on average over longer sample counts it's near the 10minute interval.

I think for people like you, or trusted players, no real expiration date, as long as its the JP basic fb rules (I think its something like a few days and small min wager).

Marketplace empty again


Its 30 days as @hosemary said, I remember it, and $10 deposit is quite reasonable actually, but that's only a small problem, I think its not such an unreasonable time, but of course, I do wish it was a bit longer. 3 months seems very fair

The last I noticed during a particular transaction is an increase in the fee rate to about 2 Sats/vbyte and that wasn't as it was before. What I can't explain or even bother to ask is if it happened automatically or it has always been like that. It makes more sense to understand that high traffic causes high fee rate but I doubt it would be as high if I didn't send a small amount instead of a large transaction amount that wouldn't have made the fee rate noticeable.

And these wanna be bitcoin investors don't have a clue about how cheap bitcoin transactions are these days. Even if they have been here since the ordinals, then they will realize how blessed they are to make a TX with 1-2sat/vb and that too included in the next block itself most of the day.

And these stories, like a friend or a colleague, are rapidly increasing with the new threads.

Congrats to the winners!

hosemary
LFC_Bitcoin
jeremypwr
notblox1
arallmuus
Harkorede

The only thing I believe will lead to what the OP colleague experienced is either the transaction is something that happened during the previous Bitcoin network congestion season or the OP colleague is one of the BTC investors that don't understand transaction fee, and overpaid for his/her transaction fee.
https://x.com/f2pool/status/1702600488963940669

Update:
DT 1
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 15148 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 11425: gmaxwell (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (18) 10544 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 33156: vapourminer (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5856 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 51173: mprep (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1772 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 55384: Foxpup (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2810 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 64507: philipma1957 (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (21) 11518 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 78147: Cyrus (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2904 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 84521: Welsh (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 3690 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 84866: ibminer (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 2867 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 97582: joker_josue (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7015 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 112493: Pmalek (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 9072 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 113670: Mitchell (Trust: +44 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (21) 2342 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 123824: albon (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2211 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 131333: wwzsocki (Trust: +14 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1529 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 137185: jeremypwr (Trust: +56 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 140582: gbianchi (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2667 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 140584: EFS (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2214 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 145841: Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    19. 164822: hilariousandco (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1957 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    20. 189967: buckrogers (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 209 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    21. 204821: Buchi-88 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2392 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    22. 206143: Lesbian Cow (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 758 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    23. 216582: willi9974 (Trust: +48 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 2990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    24. 252510: JayJuanGee (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 14034 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    25. 257071: NeuroticFish (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6280 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    26. 290195: achow101 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 6823 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    27. 300014: DaveF (Trust: +29 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (16) 7056 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    28. 314792: examplens (Trust: +10 / =5 / -0) (DT1! (25) 4006 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    29. 317618: nutildah (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (28) 10944 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    30. 350580: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +14 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 787 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    31. 355846: yahoo62278 (Trust: +42 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (26) 4531 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    32. 364070: bitbollo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 4077 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    33. 379147: pooya87 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 11571 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    34. 379487: LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 12317 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    35. 395806: o_solo_miner (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 542 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    36. 405464: mocacinno (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4541 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    37. 405482: Real-Duke (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2966 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    38. 407174: klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 4768 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    39. 459836: LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (60) 21792 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    40. 521899: SFR10 (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3169 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    41. 533583: Lucius (Trust:  neutral) (DT1! (2) 6814 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    42. 557798: TryNinja (Trust: +11 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 10651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    43. 754818: holydarkness (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1430 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    44. 805820: Lafu (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (18) 4123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    45. 807453: Cointxz (Trust: +6 / =7 / -0) (DT1! (0) 841 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    46. 839568: AakZaki (Trust: +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (5) 2304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    47. 889300: giammangiato (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1536 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    48. 901859: buwaytress (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4017 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    49. 914465: crwth (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 1375 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    50. 932931: Ale88 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3755 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    51. 949248: Kryptowerk (Trust: +44 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1350 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    52. 995810: hosemary (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 7090 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    53. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 2083 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    54. 1045971: igebotz (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2364 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    55. 1051955: roycilik (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1908 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    56. 1052091: CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 5197 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    57. 1059082: hugeblack (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4698 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    58. 1097370: KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2388 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    59. 1137579: icopress (Trust: +89 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (40) 13468 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    60. 1179651: sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    61. 1247226: logfiles (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2415 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    62. 1269497: Bitcoin_Arena (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2120 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    63. 1285797: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (19) 10225 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    64. 1424178: mole0815 (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 3702 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    65. 1554927: bitmover (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 7777 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    66. 1724800: Lakai01 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 4349 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    67. 1825672: morvillz7z (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2224 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    68. 1852120: fillippone (Trust: +11 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (19) 21519 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    69. 1862043: cryptofrka (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3256 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    70. 1878246: abhiseshakana (Trust: +2 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 2645 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    71. 1980983: The Cryptovator (Trust: +21 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 2621 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    72. 1982152: lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (27) 5868 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    73. 2003859: DireWolfM14 (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 5873 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    74. 2015418: notblox1 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1664 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    75. 2344286: Little Mouse (Trust: +51 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (4) 3830 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    76. 2477002: inspace (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1753 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    77. 2519096: Awaklara (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    78. 2597426: efialtis (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1591 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    79. 2652924: geophphreigh (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 1146 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    80. 2654005: zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 5839 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    81. 2658890: Rikafip (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 8399 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    82. 2709122: Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1892 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    83. 2739424: NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10341 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    84. 2739454: Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1659 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    85. 2744352: bullrun2024bro (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 5396 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    86. 2745549: decodx (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1000 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    87. 2776678: Charles-Tim (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 6561 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    88. 2796662: Lillominato89 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1305 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    89. 2836461: Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3663 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    90. 3442536: AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (6) 2047 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    91. 3442614: YodasRedRocket (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (1) 651 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    92. 3486361: PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 7322 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    93. 3519432: SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1082 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    94. 3558380: Mia Chloe (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 2300 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

DT 2
     1. 3: satoshi (Trust: +39 / =0 / -0) (8901 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 4: sirius (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 1268: nanotube (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 2676: casascius (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 2759: midnightmagic (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (27 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 2786: Pieter Wuille (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 3380: Vladimir (Trust:  neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 3420: dooglus (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (335 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 4171: Raize (Trust:  neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 4528: Matt Corallo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 6347: Maged (Trust:  neutral) (17 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 6447: forrestv (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (143 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 7351: EPiSKiNG (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 10354: JJG (Trust:  neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Thanks, hosemary, for answering this. I also wanted to know about it. As I agree with zasad@ that manual intervention should be removed and the deal should adjust itself automatically according to the amount we send, but if it's lower, then they can add manual intervention. But still, it's not a problem for me as well.

Many platforms have shown the minimum amount only and allowed people to send more than that, and that can be any amount but should be less than maximum ofc. But I kind of have an opinion for such platforms that they should not do it. Anyway, sophistication is in what Batlex already did, but adding an automatic adjusting feature would have smoothen the experience too.

But I have a question according to the following terms. Do we have to contact the team every time (if that's what manual intervention is) when we send higher or lower funds, or will funds be reversed/refunded automatically if we have added the refund address?

@hosemary considering how we both suck this round, I think a draw is the fair outcome. Having said that, at one point last night situation looked very bad for me, as France was leading 1-0 (which was exactly what you needed), and Sweden had an identical lead against BiH, which was again what you needed.

Considering everything, I should be satisfied with a draw. My hedge ticket somehow passed as well, so I even made a little bit of money. Surviving LMS would be the cherry on top. 


Having seen our lineup, I will be very surprised if the game stays under 2.5 goals. Even though, last time we played vs England at the same stadium (back in 2018, few months after WC) game ended 0-0.

It is better as the difference is usually $1-$3, which may be withdrawal fees or blockchain fees. differs significantly may mean that the slight difference will be handled automatically.

Same bro! Looking forward very much to Champions League and RTG,,, to remove bad memories of BSFL where you can 'blame' your teammates for helping your team to lose their game  


700 days I confirm. Once I activate them I see the timer is 699 days plus 23 hours 59 minutes and counting

That is almost 2 whole years to use them, best site ever  

I am still receiving 2 every day but I did not check these notifications until I saw your posts, it does seem it is daily,,, I cannot really remember the days I did not deposit either but will try to keep notice from now on.

In fact I will not log in today and see tomorrow if I get it, thanks for the feedback guys!

Nope as it has been pointed out, only things purchased from marketplace could be listed there so he bought it from the house on 2% discount then listed it there for 8% discount. Pretty weird if you ask me


This actually makes sense.



This was on 1st September and before that I cleared out my boxes on 18th May so thats just like 3 months for $30+. It just make sense now that they probably stop gifting those boxes if people stop depositing regularly onto the site.

Imagine collecting only daily boxes and deposit $10 every 3 months to get $30+, JP would lose money on this

I cant really remember but I think they give other boxes as well aside from just daily login. I used to get alot more than just the daily 2 boxes

Sorry guys, our contact inside SB has been super busy this week and I believe these aren't paid. They will probably be credited next week, together with Week 3 bunch.

Yes is strange because the only i know is they didnt let you open the boxes if you dont have a deposit in the last 10 days or something like that if im not rememering it bad. Maybe it was more days, but i dont know about you stop receiving boxes, but somehow it have some logic, since for sure they dont want to have people collecting it like crazy and after a few months entering a single deposit and withdrawing without playing at all and taking home all the rewards.

Wrong final lol I went to the official website and saw 2025 final, which was won by Barcelona,,, lucky me here! I won a point 


I saw the odds was slightly in favor of Barcelona like 1.85 and Vezprem was 1.95 but without knowing how they played I just went for the 'funnier' sounding name.

I just realised my mistake (I was incorrectly counting h2h) and logged in to edit my post, only to see that you already corrected me. 


Imo, that's the worst type of question as you need shit luck to win it (I am also not happy with my answer). What also sucks is that you can't even properly hedge in our current situation to get something out if it in the case of a loss.

True, it doesn't make much sense to research in those kind of situations, but sometimes I simply have to try find an edge (which I usually don't, like in this case  ).

---

At one point, situation tonight looked really good, as besides Greece comfortably leading 2-0, Denmark had a draw. In the end, Portugal scored two more goals, and I had to sweat until the last minute, hoping that Greece wouldn't concede another one.

In the end it was ok as now I have 1-1, which is quite a poor result after 6 questions. The good thing is that there are 3 different answers left between me and hosemary, so it could be interesting until the end and who knows, maybe even gonna be enough to survive LMS.
.

We should likely be seeing it that a lot of patronage happens in DEX.of which exhausts their reserve so fast and throw the fast and white offline after it appears online briefly.

I noticed the mistake, but I didn't correct it, it was a test to see if my favourite user in this thread will jump on it He pays attention to details and I like him.

Here he comes...
I left the mistake that way to see your reaction and you reacted exactly as I expected

The raffle is $30k in dollars, I'll win it this weekend and by next week I'll go pay bride price with BTC

I give DEX all their flowers. The person behind the account is determined and he understands the power of availability and active support.

Yeah, we write them up earlier than that. Sometimes on Saturday, sometimes on Sunday morning. We only do last minute changes when it really matters or something important happens. We each write 5 questions and that one was from cryptofrka, I didn't even know anything about it until Tuesday when I did my research to post answers

There will definitely be plenty of new coins, but it's a gradual process, not a one-day job. First we get the service itself fully polished, then we start adding coins. Requests from this thread are one of the inputs — SOL is clearly at the top. And examplens put it well: for Fast & White every new coin needs its own reserves, so expansion goes hand in hand with liquidity, not just a listing.



The Fast & White pauses are scheduled technical work on our side. We usually do it at night, roughly from 20:00–21:00 UTC until about 05:00 UTC, so the mode may be unavailable during those hours — logfiles, that may be why you've kept missing it. Today was an exception: the work took longer and Fast & White was offline for most of the day. It's finished now and the mode is up and running again. Chain works around the clock in the meantime, and our goal is still to get Fast & White to 24/7.


Glad it went smoothly for you — and good luck in the raffle.

If anyone has other wishes or suggestions about how the service works, we're happy to hear them.

When questions were posted, yes, but they probably started writing the questions much before that. I can only assume how much time they spend each time to make those 10 questions, and to make all outcomes as equal as possible.

But yeah, gotta expected curve ball every once in a while from mafia. 

Info terbaru - DT Member bulan Oktober 2026
DT1 Member periode kali ini berjumlah 116 user (bertambah 5 DT1 dari periode sebelumnya)

Daftar lama: Code: HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty qwk Vod vapourminer mprep philipma1957 babo Cyrus Welsh ibminer d5000 joker_josue Pmalek albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hybridsole stompix hilariousandco Buchi-88 willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo zazarb pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki The Sceptical Chymist SFR10 Lucius TryNinja holydarkness tweetious AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk hosemary JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack KTChampions Trofo icopress JeromeTash logfiles Bitcoin_Arena tvplus006 mole0815 bitmover DdmrDdmr shahzadafzal Lakai01 morvillz7z Husna QA Bthd fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 Little Mouse YOSHIE inspace jokers10 Awaklara geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro decodx BlackHatCoiner Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist YodasRedRocket Mia Chloe

-----

Daftar Baru: Code: theymos HostFat gmaxwell OgNasty Vod vapourminer mprep Foxpup philipma1957 Cyrus Welsh ibminer joker_josue Pmalek Mitchell albon wwzsocki Timelord2067 jeremypwr gbianchi EFS Swordsoffreedom hilariousandco buckrogers Buchi-88 Lesbian Cow willi9974 JayJuanGee NeuroticFish achow101 DaveF examplens nutildah irfan_pak10 yahoo62278 bitbollo pooya87 LFC_Bitcoin o_solo_miner mocacinno Real-Duke klarki LoyceV SFR10 Lucius TryNinja holydarkness Lafu Cointxz AakZaki giammangiato buwaytress crwth Ale88 Kryptowerk Vispilio hosemary JollyGood igebotz roycilik CryptopreneurBrainboss hugeblack KTChampions icopress sheenshane logfiles Bitcoin_Arena GazetaBitcoin mole0815 bitmover Lakai01 morvillz7z fillippone cryptofrka abhiseshakana The Cryptovator lovesmayfamilis DireWolfM14 notblox1 Little Mouse inspace Awaklara efialtis geophphreigh zasad@ Rikafip Etranger NotATether Stalker22 bullrun2024bro decodx Charles-Tim Lillominato89 Free Market Capitalist ZAINmalik75 AHOYBRAUSE YodasRedRocket PowerGlove SirJohnVonSlotty Mia Chloe

-----

DT1 dari Indonesia: Code: AakZaki abhiseshakana roycilik

Sumber: DT update log Oktober 2026

This month 116 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

I think so, I logged in to my account in the past few days but no mystery box is given into my account so high possibility that daily login is no longer giving mystery boxes out.
Based on what I can see in the notifications tab, the last time I received mystery box was on September 2nd, no other mystery boxes after that while also I played (not much as I played with my remaining balance only) last week but I did not receive any mystery boxes as well.
If it is true that there is a change in how to earn mystery boxes, Jackpotter need to update the information under the mystery boxes page.

Whenever I have used this platform to perform a swap, I have not chanced to use it with the "Fast & White" mode or Fast mode as it was before is active so I have never had the opportunity to experience it.
On the other hand, the chain mode seems reliable and have not experience any issue so far. The swap speed isn't bad either.

Sometimes Fast & White mode may not work either because of high volume of transactions where reserves might be the issue or because of some fixes to make that mode more stable.

At most times the mode is active and works, some users mostly prefer that mode while rest are okay with the Chain mode.

I noticed Chain mode is always in working state so in times when someone can't use the Fast & White mode then one should use Chain mode at such times.

Yes, that’s correct. The key point is that the fee is based on withdrawal series, not the number of individual withdrawals. Multiple consecutive withdrawals without a deposit in between count as one series.
So if you make one deposit and then several withdrawals, those withdrawals are still part of the same series. Thanks for helping clarify this.