Last update: 2025-12-08_Mon_20.12h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
LoyceV receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Timelord2067
2. LoyceV
3. wolwoo
4. Bitcoin SV
5. The-One-Above-All
6. Excimer
7. truth or dare
8. bonesjonesreturns
9. KaneVWE
10. Laudanum
11. Quantum_Resolve7987V
Posts in these topics are ignored:
1. [ТОП-200] Щедрые пользователи, дающие мериты
2. [TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks!
3. [TOП-200] Пoльзoвaтeли, пoддepживaющиe нoвичкoв - Cпacибo!
4. Time Series Analysis on Distributed Merits in the forum (daily, weekly, monthly)
5. [CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs
6. Interquartile range of intra-day merits with time series plot
7. Timelord2067's Timely Test and Main-neT LighTning Loans to a "T"
8. Weekly earned merits (median) of top 100 merited users
9. The active levels of sent/earned merits of users , excludes autobanned/ nuked
10. Bitcointalk Merit Dashboard
Username "LoyceV" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66148665 (unedited backup) (by nutildah) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 20:10:49 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
What other solution is there apart from killing the monetary incentive in the first place?
I'd say enforcing this
9 years old guidelines would be a good start.
Ha. What was described there 9 years ago is exactly what is happening now, except on a much greater scale:
Due to the unacceptable level of spam and low-quality posts signature campaigns generate we have decided to offer some guidelines of what is and isn't acceptable and an explanation of the punishments for users who continually make low quality contributions and the campaigns that continue to pay them to do so. Signature campaigns should be a way to reward users for quality contributions and only those that do should be paid, but at the moment it has become a way for many campaign operators to lazily and cheaply advertise their business by paying greedy users to spam whatever unsubstantial rubbish they can be bothered putting the minimal amount of effort in to and this will no longer be tolerated.
It is stunning how much of a mirror this description is to our current situation. I don't want to say "nothing has changed" because I think what happened was we all got complacent again. But the reintroduction of regular sig and temp bans for continual production of low-quality content would be a good start in helping to correct things.
2. Post 66148050 (unedited backup) (by coinlary) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 17:52:55 CET 2025) in How to make sure your bitcoin reaches the next generation:
I don't know about the time lock mentioned above, but it is way safer if you let your loved ones know your backup but keep it in a safety vault.
With a locktime, you can still let them know your backups, wherever you store them. But instead, it will be that of the wallet they would be inheriting from the time locked transaction. You are keeping the seed safe for them this way, in case they might not do it properly, but they know where it is. That way, you can teach them how to broadcast the locked transaction, keep some copies safe, and also give them some copies of the transaction to keep safe.
The only thing is that they can't inherit it until whenever you want, so you can just set a time you think it's enough to inherit it, Dead or Alive.
I made a guide using Electrum (nLockTime ):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5566222.msg66081539#msg66081539LoyceV locktime discussion thread :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5180850.0~
What I would consider a better way is locking the UXTO totally with CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. It is an advanced feature and which you must be familiar with writing scripts since you would be required to write a lock script that would lock the UTXO until the required time or block Height has been met when it would be available for spending.
~
You can go through this thread :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2415595.0
3. Post 66147847 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 17:15:20 CET 2025) in Mempool Observer Topic:
- fastestFee: 2.512 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 1.333 sat/vB
- hourFee: 0.613 sat/vB
- economyFee: 0.2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 0.1 sat/vB
Hey guys, I was finally able to update FeeBuddy to the more precise estimations, now supporting less than 1 sat/vB estimations of fees.
I will quote users who are active here in the thread:
@examplens @nutildah @stompix @BlackHatCoiner @LoyceV
Maybe I missed someone.
4. Post 66147276 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 15:05:01 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
OPEN BETA is overWe want to thank all testers who took the time to explore and stress-test Bridgoro.
Thanks to your efforts, the platform has already improved significantly since the first Beta, and it will continue to evolve.
We especially want to highlight Bitcointalk member
[LoyceV], who identified several critical issues that we wouldn't have discovered on our own. And special thanks to users
Cyberczar,
German Sniper, and
Tin Tiger from the Telegram channel. These guys joined the OPEN BETA on day one and tested everything from start to finish.
The last few weeks were tough for us as we worked to fix bugs while staying active with the community, but we are happy with the outcome. Please give us a few days to review all bug reports, evaluate their quality, and filter out duplicates. After that, we will announce the
TOP 10 most active testers. We will also request
BTC wallets (
or XMR wallets if preferred) from the winners so we can send out the rewards. All reward transfers will be published on our
Telegram channel and the
Bitcointalk thread for transparency.
Even though the Beta has ended, we hope you will stay with us as we have several important announcements coming about the future of Bridgoro.
Let's just say that once
eXch inspired us to create Bridgoro, now Bridgoro is inspiring us to expand the project and go far beyond a no-KYC P2P exchange.
One more update: the public release of Bridgoro will likely be delayed due to ongoing bug fixes. We want to ensure everything is solid before going live, so the new estimated release window is around
January 2026.
As always, we will keep you informed.
5. Post 66147266 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 15:03:31 CET 2025) in More cloudflare issues?:
My take:
There are millions of websites out there, and millions of compromised (mostly Windows) computers that form botnets which can be rented. Those botnets are cheap to rent and can DDoS a few servers at a time for any reason (let's call it extortion or just hurting competitors), after which the owners show a Pavlov response and run towards Cloudflare. That makes them more or less immune to DDoS, because Cloudflare is big enough to be able to stop that entire botnet. But the botnet still exists, and moves on to the next target that's not behind "DDoS protection" yet.
~snip~
Unfortunately, the most damage is done by those who are not even aware of it, and I have always wondered how to warn all those users who have been hacked, so to speak, and whose computers are practically used for such attacks. I recently read an article that mentioned a free online version for checking IP addresses in the context of malicious activity. I don't know how much sense this check makes, considering that IP addresses are mostly dynamic these days.
https://check.labs.greynoise.io
6. Post 66147145 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 14:35:49 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
This sounds like a problem in your implementation. When I take one UTXO (with non-rounded value) and send it to another address, there is no change address necessary. See
9a8e9bbe51c37c229eb5d9922a719af841e99cd3cffe8f6a2986a7f3f4ac0924 for example.
Maybe you're trying to calculate the amount to send by assuming a fee and subtracting it from the total, instead of doing "send all minus fee", as I did in the transaction above.
We did a small round of research regarding UTXOs, and we agree that the case where a transaction splits into two outputs with one of them being 311 sats, does happen. Our current method for handling Bitcoin blockchain data isn't perfect, and we definitely have room for improvement. Thank you for pointing this out, because honestly, we probably wouldn't have noticed it ourselves. Previously, we had noticed similar transactions, but since they were just UTXOs worth around 0.1-0.3 cents, we simply ignored that part.
Press the info icon (i) next to the Deal Details popup header.
Thanks, that's all I was looking for. It's amazing how blind I am to such obvious things.... I really searched for something!
It's not because you didn't see it, it's because our UX/UI wasn't done well in that part.
We will think it through and hopefully come up with a more intuitive UX solution.
I was alarmed for a different reason; acception isn't even a word that's used anymore. This isn't trivial, because any native English speaking customers are going to see that and probably jump to a quick conclusion that Bridgoro is another fly-by-night foreign exchange that's trying to attract English speaking traders (for whatever reason) but doesn't know the language themselves. Exception or acceptance would be what you're going for here.
That's constructive criticism, by the way. Hopefully I did not misinterpret something, lest I look like the entire rear end of a donkey.
Thank you for the thoughtful criticism.
Honestly, we didn't expect it to spark any discussion at all.
In any case, we genuinely appreciate the time you’ve invested in contributing to our project and for going through several, if not all, pages in this thread. Now, let me address your feedback. We accept your criticism, but we’d like to clarify a few points to avoid any misunderstandings.
First, we never claimed to be native English speakers. Yes, we speak English fluently, I'm fluent in three languages, and my teammate is fluent in two. So we don't see any issue with running the project in English, especially considering that it's an international language and roughly 99% of all projects use it as their primary communication medium.
Regarding the specific word you pointed out, I'd like to emphasize an important distinction: writing frontend text in English and writing the backend underlying code, including developer-mode error messages, are essentially two different English languages.
Also, if that RBF option can be abused successfully, you'll have a line of scammers ten thousand long just waiting to rip you off. I wish you luck and hope something like that doesn't happen.
RBF won't be abused in any way, because this part will be improved and properly fixed before launch.
And yes, we fully agree that a lot of scammers will try to target Bridgoro, that's exactly why we decided to run two Beta tests instead of pushing out a buggy release like many big companies do.
We care about what we are building, and before going live, we want to deliver something that may not be perfect, but as close to it as possible.
Whitepaper
Link:
https://bridgoro.gitbook.io/bridgoro-docs/terms-and-privacy/terms-and-conditionsCapital letters instead of small caps:
7. Intellectual Property
Bridgoro doesn't claim ownership of any intellectual property at this stage.
The project is not open source for now, as the core functionality (Cross-chain Bridge) is under active development.
core functionality (cross-chain bridge) is under active development.
In our case, we used Cross-Chain Bridge as an acronym. An acronym formed from the first letters of each word.
8. Data Collection and Privacy
Bridgoro exchange respects users' privacy. The only user data collected is the email address used for account registration and login. This data is:
'is' removal
The Data Collection and Privacy paragraph was fully rewritten because certain parts changed during the BETA phase, so we added an exception regarding our use of Cloudflare.
Fixed.
The amount descriptions were rewritten to make them clearer for users.
[Amount you sent] shows how much of the asset you submitted for the exchange.
[Amount you get] shows how much of the exchanged asset you will receive or have already received.
Page:
https://bridgoro.gitbook.io/bridgoro-docs/system-architecture/whitepaperBridgoro is a semi-decentralized exchange because it combines two worlds into one and takes the best parts. An automated escrow system using blockchain adapters and smart contracts ensures secure, trustless swaps come from the decentralized part, and user-friendly matchmaking and rate modules make the platform intuitive and smooth for all users is from the centralized world.
all users from
This paragraph has been fully revised and rewritten.
Bridgoro is a semi-decentralized exchange because it combines two worlds into one and takes the best of both. The automated escrow system, powered by blockchain adapters and smart contracts, delivers secure and trustless swaps from the decentralized side, while user-friendly matchmaking and rate modules provide the intuitive and smooth experience typical of centralized platforms.
Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) adds an additional layer of security to user accounts by requiring a secondary verification step after entering the password. Users can enable 2FA via their account settings. Need to implement Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) via authenticator apps (e.g., Google Authenticator, Authy).If 2FA enabled, After successfully entering their password, users are prompted to complete 2FA.The system should also allow the user to save the recovery code so that they can restore 2FA in case they lose their phone. Additionally, there should be an option for administrators to disable 2FA if the user loses access.
is missing and after successfully
Fixed.
ETH Contract addresses bug:
Upon putting contract address instead of goto regular address, the XMR-ETH offer in the explore offers section is getting submitted without going through any address validity checker.
Contract Eth address used: 0x5AbFEc25f74Cd88437631a7731906932776356f9
=This should be prevented for causing loss of funds.
SOL token creator address or Mint address bug:
Offer creation is possible with a dummy mint address on the BTC-SOL pair
Mint address used: pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn
TRon smart contract address:
BTC-TRX
Thanks for testing the address validation using contract addresses.
But if a user submits a contract address instead of their own standard wallet address, the resulting loss will be categorized as Dumb Loss.
As we mentioned earlier, if a user can't complete two basic steps like depositing the required amount into the designated wallet and confirming the deposit, then that user really shouldn't be handling crypto at all.
Tradingview Cookie:
Page: Homepage bridgoro.com
Cookie
tradingview-widget.sessions
Source: tradingview-widget.com
Site writes analytical or trading tool related aren't stored and session only
We have rewritten the T&C section in GitBook and will update the in-site version shortly.
8. Data Collection and Privacy
Bridgoro exchange respects users' privacy. The only user data collected is the email address used for account registration and login. Our data practices ensure the following:
Stored securely
Not used for tracking, marketing, or profiling
Never shared with third parties
Exception: We use Cloudflare, which may collect certain technical data for its own operational and security purposes. Unfortunately, we cannot restrict this collection, as Cloudflare is essential for protecting Bridgoro from DDoS attacks, intrusion attempts, and potential data leaks (including IP address exposure).
Users can view the Privacy Policy for more information.
7. Post 66146470 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 10:55:07 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
Read it again, it doesn't ask that.
It seems to me that rather than me rereading it, you're the one who's going to need glasses:
Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?
I couldn't care less about your chatbot response.
The fact that someone as rational as you does those things indicates that it is your emotional side that is kicking in every time you see the word AI.
But I see that this is turning into a mega thread, originating from a two-part question, the correct answers to which I will now provide:
Is BCT dead
No.most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?
No.Go ahead, keep arguing about campaigns and moderators and SEO and all that stuff, but this whole thread is based on blatant false premises.
8. Post 66146325 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Mon Dec 8 10:17:31 CET 2025) in User snuffman8 spread false/fake information on technical board:
User:
alani123Additional information (optional):
* While i only list 2 posts, this user actually created more posts containing false information about Taproot, SegWit and OP_RETURN.
List of post:
Is taproot important? Not in any functional way. Although, in terms of adoption, many thousands of NFT users abused exploits introduced by taproot soft forks to pump useless data like images into bitcoin. The so called ordinals and inscriptions had a huge impact on the bitcoin Blockchain. So although very far from the envisioned use, taproot did receive a lot of use just because it introduced these colours that wouldn't have let BTC to otherwise support this ridiculous NFT tulip mania.
Taproot actually have 2 main technical benefit,
1. Schnorr Signature. It aggregate signature, which reduce signature size then Taproot address require N-of-M signature for spending.
2. Tapscript. When you spend Bitcoin from Taproot address with multiple spending condition, Tapscript only reveal part of the script which reduce overall TX size and slightly improve privacy.
NFT and token actually can be "created" on Bitcoin network without using SegWit or Taproot. Counterparty (exist since 2014) and Runes (which use OP_RETURN) prove that.
I read it, and I read it again. I can't see why anyone would want this. When syncing Bitcoin Core, you sync everything. When using an API, I assume you're looking for specific parts, and the parts you're looking for shouldn't be altered. So I see absolutely no use for this.
When bitcoin core 30 is implemented (it's already scheduled to) the OP_RETURN limit being turned off will result to unlimited amounts of data being added in a block and utilizing the witness discount.
Ordinals become obsolete. There will be no more need for stitching together 40 byte inputs through third party tools and external implementations. This means that anyone storing the Blockchain in full could potential have entire images or files of whatever has been uploaded. And yes it's no lie that this can result in harmful files which many parties would be interested to filter.
As if everyone hadn't been warned before this being implementation on core 30. This makes bitcoin prone to sabotage and nodes even more centralised.
1. OP_RETURN doesn't benefit from witness discount, because OP_RETURN isn't categorized as witness data.
2. If spammer switch from Ordinal (or other approach that use witness data) to OP_RETURN, the negative impact would be lower since OP_RETURN isn't added to chainstate/UTXO set and maximum block size (in bytes) would be lower.
9. Post 66144308 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 20:44:31 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
You found time to test even on the last day of the BETA, so I decided to make time to respond to your reports while the Beta is still running.
1. Dumb Fee term is not defined in the Glossary, as it was added later after masulum pointed out roll back mechanism is not working, so you defined it in the “ how-do-buffer-wallets-work” page but did not add anything about Dumb fee in the Whitepaper’s Glossary and other parts where it should be written and it is also not been updated in the
https://bridgoro.gitbook.io/bridgoro-docs/system-architecture/glossary-of-terms page.
Status: [Fixed]
2. On the Whitepaper Page, we scroll down the body, like we scroll down from Glossary to the bottom but the TOC (Table of Content) in the right is not moving (syncing) it suppose to move with the body scrolling down, it is not a bug but a UI suggestion, if you like, it feels more sophisticated.
GitBook doesn't belong to us.
And if you look closely, the right-side panel moves as you scroll down and even highlights the paragraph you are currently viewing.
Note: I was checking grammatical and spelling mistakes on the Bridgoro Docs Page and found a few grammatical mistakes that need changes and a lot of suggestions to make the content more sophisticated and trouble-free for you and for the users. I will mention the mistakes that need to be corrected and will gather the suggestions one by one.
3.On the whitepaper page in the last, (System Architecture → Whitepaper → 4.6 Long-Term Vision), a line is written "The roadmap's ultimate trajectory leads toward Brodgoro's self-sustaining ecosystem" The project name is not correct.
Status: [Fixed]
4. On the Explore offers page: the first line is correct, but the same line is written on the My offers page in the Docs. As can be seen in the images below, the line should be different like: "On this page, you can view and manage your own exchange offers that you’ve created on Bridgoro."
Status: [Fixed]
5. This word is missing an apostrophe, it is necassary as it should be written as "platform’s".
Status: [Fixed]
6. Need space here: I know not a major bug but as I defined earlier some grammatical mistakes and contradictions in the whitepaper can cause trouble later even from legal point of view as users might get the wrong idea.
Status: [Fixed]
7. The highlighted line in the image below is very troublesome for you, because here you are being good from your perception but if someone copies your code, you might not be able to claim later just because you have said this in your policy as in easy words: it suggests that Bridgoro is not asserting any IP rights over its code, branding, documentation, or design, which directly contradicts the platform’s closed-source and "classified" stance mention below this point. I hope you understand this. It needs to be removed or modified.
We already answered to this question
here.
Yes, we are certain that we will not claim ownership.
The reason is simple: once we start claiming ownership, we immediately run into problems because Bridgoro has no KYC or AML policies.
8. The highlighted line is very conflicting with the Dumb fee explained just below it. As in the Dumb Fee section, you said
If the transferred funds exceed the required amount, we classify the difference as a Dumb Fee. The exceeding amount remains in the Buffer Wallet until the collector module retrieves it. A user can recover this exceeded Dumb Fee by contacting the support team after a short investigation.
Dumb Fee applies only to the excess amount during DEAL acceptance. But if you send an excess amount during OFFER creation, your offer will be recalculated instead.
To avoid any double interpretation, I added the following clarification under the sentence you highlighted:
But when sending a larger amount while accepting DEALS (offers created by other users), the excess amount is counted as a DUMB FEE and remains in the Buffer Wallet.Status: [Fixed]
Those two descriptions clash:
One says: extra amount → user gets more, offer recalculated.
The other says: extra amount → treated as Dumb Fee, stays in buffer, only recoverable via support.
Status: [Fixed]
9. In the image below, on the Glossary of Terms page, which is dedicated to the terms so writing an incomplete term on this page will conflict with the purpose of its existence. Like in the image, the first heading shows the amount as a dead asset amount but when written in the dead wallet definition, it is written as dead amount instead of dead asset amount.
Status: [Fixed]
10. In the "How to start earning" Page, nothing is mentioned. If it is coming soon, then it should be mentioned as well, because not writing anything can confuse the viewer into thinking maybe this page is not reloading on my side, so let's reload it. But in reality, there is nothing there. If it is pending, then add a note there.
Status: [Fixed]
11. The Table header row is not fixed when we scroll down to the last order, so when we are at the last and confirming the information along the row, we can't know what the data is about like what YES or NO is about so the user has to go all the up to the header row to check the heading of that colume. It's a suggestion that can make the usage more easy if that works for you.
We will make the table header sticky, so it stays visible as you scroll down through the content.
Status: [Added to backlog]
12. While enterning the amount while creating the offer, their should be mentioned how much should I at least chose to avoid the buffer wallet issue, As I tried entering amount two times and I did not get any notification about the amount should be more than X. I just got the notification that the entered amount is less than the dead wallet amount but how much is that is not mentioned a some idea displayed there for a new member is a good choice.
We will evaluate how to improve this part after the release.
Thanks for the suggestion.
13. QR code integration is also good for those using smartphones for sending funds, nobody wants to waste time on copying and pasting the wallet address here and there, qr code can fasten the process (just a suggestion).
The QR suggestion was submitted to us during the first Beta, and we will implement it after the release.
14. On the main page where we explore offers, now unlike before the total pages are four and in all those pages the amount available to open the trade is different like th trade in first place has less available amount and the second has more and the third might have lower the point is, we should be allowed to arrange this columne of available by clicking, like one click all the offers are arranged from higher available amount to lower and another click will reverse that.
It will be implemented after the release.
15. At the end of the explore offer page where it says "Showing 1 to 20 of 41 offers" Most of the platforms have show lines options like if we want to see 20 lines or 50 line or 100 lines that feature would be great to see all the lines/offers in one go for a person in hurry. Although Filter feature is for them but still it can be helpful.
This UX feature will be also added after release.
I created offers and made deals, tested profile, faced no issue like really everything was smooth, due to high number of offers testing the platform was easier. I tested with wrong receiving address, tried to make trade with wrong level offers, tried huge and negative numbers while making deals, tested 2fa, checked notification system and I tested few other things that normally a users will do, but I found no error, no bugs, till now. Everything was working very smooth and sophistically. Great work really appreciatable.
Thanks, buddy for putting in the effort to test so many important areas that needed verification. We are glad that in Beta 2 we've seen fewer bugs than in the first round, and the exchange feature is performing much better than it did during the initial Beta. But thanks to LoyceV, we identified several critical issues, and we are actively working on them now.
10. Post 66144103 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 19:40:49 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
UI/UX overlap and z-index hierarchy problem
On mobile devices, the user profile dropdown menu is overlapping the primary CTA buttons "Start Exchange" and "Start Earn".
Yeah, I see it.
Fun fact: the menu overlaps with the two buttons only on the homepage. We will get that fixed.
Status: [Added to backlog]
Overlay Modal Exceeds Viewport and Overlaps Browser UI
The beta notification modal does not show fully on mobile devices. The title above is not fully visible. A scrollbar needs to be placed here.
The popup size will be adjusted, and its ratio will scale properly based on the screen size.
Status: [Added to backlog]
I'll test this later, December 5 is kids-day here
Family should always come first
That would make sense, but it's not what happened. See
my Rollback Transaction:
The transaction fee was 141 sats, and 311 sats (0.1%) was sent to tb1q7nqts63qz0w8j5k97jwprsupsaxwg8q3j9sndv, which I assume is Bridgoro's address.
Follow-up (a day later): someone took one of my Offers, and sent a payment:
4789745x8x0 tb1q52rktesraglsm5kq7wzthshm7v7vy2csxnth22 0.02000254
4789745x8x1 tb1qf8zs6nmfxec2ert5rzakkpmnjz9m3d986d0lp2 0.00000311
Here, there's 311 sats going to another address again. I expected the fee to be a percentage, and I've seen different values for some transactions, but most of them end up sending exactly 311 sats to another address.
Bridgoro is fee-free during testing and will remain fee-free at release.
What you are seeing isn't a fee, it's a UTXO (unspent transaction output).
This behavior is related to Bitcoin's architecture, not to us.
A tiny leftover like 0.00000311 BTC (311 satoshis) appears when:
- The UTXO used as input had a non-rounded value
- The necessary transaction fee was deducted
- The remaining amount wasn't large enough to be useful, but was still above the wallet's dust threshold
- The wallet decided to create a small change UTXO instead of discarding it
TCP Timestamps Information or Session expirybridgoro.comTCP timestamp is enabled (default setting)
set tcp-option disable <-- Default value is enable
It was detected that the host implements RFC1323/RFC7323.
The following timestamps were retrieved with a delay of 1 seconds in-between:
Packet 1: 1386648869
Packet 2: 1867871899
There was a delay of 1 seconds in-between packets
This can cause a time-based authentication protocol to lose therefore allowing to compute the uptime
In general, this isn't dangerous.
Knowing system uptime can help attackers:
- Infer reboot times
- Determine whether a system was recently patched
- Coordinate certain blind timing attacks
- Correlate hosts behind NAT or load balancers
But it doesn't provide access, expose credentials, or compromise authentication directly.
The reference to [ time-based authentication ] loss relates to a theoretical weakness in protocols that rely on precise timing, but this isn't a practical attack vector just because of timestamps.
I tried RBF on BTC, while creating an offer to trade BTC for XMR. There's a blockstorm on testnet at the moment, so I only have a few seconds for RBF.
I tried 4 times:
1. Offer ID: fd9a8340-498d-4c69-b74d-64dbe98fb312: RBF failed, the initial transaction confirmed. This Offer is Active.
2. Offer ID: c4f9b59e-0173-4be8-8d00-4d9d26770dd9: RBF succeeded, the initial transaction was replaced. This Offer is stuck as "Partially Confirmed". Interesting detail: I entered amount 0.0006, and sent 0.0006. BUT: My Offer Details now shows Amount to be deposited: 0.00059999. How did this happen?
3. Offer ID: 4d06b394-798a-4938-959e-52d6e90d4b9c: RBF failed, the initial transaction confirmed. BUT: This Offer is stuck as "Partially Confirmed". I think Bridgoro may have picked up on the RBF transaction (the one with higher fee) before it saw the first lower-fee transaction, and got stuck when the low-fee transaction got confirmed. I'm just guessing what happened here.
4. Offer ID: c01e3649-73ba-467f-ab57-dc72ee96780d: RBF succeeded, the initial transaction was replaced. This Offer is stuck as "Partially Confirmed".
I think the RBF implementation needs some work
Appreciate you testing RBF.
We are already investigating the stuck transaction case (because of RBF) and are conducting a deep analysis to determine the proper fix.
Status: [Added to backlog]
Today I decided to complete the tasks again and check the bonus accrual. So far, everything is working as expected. The bonuses have been credited to my account. However, when I click the "Claim" button again, I'm a bit alarmed by the pop-up message in the lower right corner. The idea is really good. It will help keep the audience on the site.
The Claim Task bug was already
reported, and we are actively working on it as well.
It will be resolved in our next upcoming patch.
Status: [Already added to backlog]
A good option would be to move this status to a button to avoid confusion for users. It's not very visually convenient to check it in a separate block.
There's no need to move the status field because the Claim Task bug is still present.
Once it's fixed, recurring tasks will show as [Available], and claimed tasks will automatically move to the [Claimed] tab.
It's been 5 days ago from this case, my sol stuck on buffer address, waiting for 7 days will be too long iguess, I don't think 0.6 SOL will counted as dumb fee in the mainet
i just want to see where I can collect this without contacting support manually, but it not available yet.
I suggest to add a feature to claim the amount from buffer address that not used for transactions such as overpayments or in case buyer not press the confirm button or even in case have another issue happened, this feature can be useful and can be integrated with rollback functions for the actions.
Just an idea of the feature
after 1 or 2 hours from last confirmations needed, if not used to exchange, that asset will be shown in profile pages maybe on balance or statistics feature. Only assets that able to be claimed after deducted fees (if needed).
Unfortunately, stuck amounts can only be recovered by contacting the support team.
Providing users with direct access to the buffer wallet recovery would introduce new attack vectors. For security reasons, the Buffer Wallet logic follows simple but strict rules.
The Collector Module scans wallets with stuck funds once per week to avoid interfering with active offers.
Dumb Fee remains Dumb Fee. We will introduce a threshold where some Dumb Fee may be returned to the user, but a significant commission will apply since this requires manual processing on our side.
Suggestion: when an Offer is Completed, stop auto-refreshing the Deals page every few seconds, this makes it difficult to read the details:
Yeah, we will fix that as well.
Status: [Already added to backlog]
Username bug:
Two different accounts got the same username
My account in test 2
Referral's account participated in Test 1
In fact, it can change into any username who participated in Test1.
It's not a bug.
We wiped the entire database when deploying the
hotfix, so all data (including user accounts and usernames) was deleted.
Not sure what you mean by "you can change into any username that participated in test1"
For starters, according to Bridgoro on TG the whole database was wiped clean after hotfix patch 1 and that includes accounts that registered in the beta test 1, so any of us trying to take part in beta test 2 are required to
re-register If it's not the case, it would be nice to have steps to replicate this bug 🐛 so that the Bridgoro team can pinpoint this bug:)
Thanks for helping clarify the user database wipe situation.
Username bug(2nd part):
e.g. 'nm9' is accepted as username but '9nm' isn't accepted.
'nm9' sometimes appear Status code 400
This is a bug.
Thanks for reporting it.
Status: [Added to backlog]
This is what My Offers looks like now:
This list will quickly become very long. I know there are Filters, but it would be nice if I can click "Hide" on the entries I no longer need to see. This "Hide" feature shouldn't be available on Active Offers, but for Completed (or "rollback completed") Offers.
We will implement the feature to hide inactive offers and deals (completed, deposit timeout, aborted) after the release.
When one of My Deals is completed, it looks like this:
What I'm missing is my withdrawal data: which address did the withdrawal go to? Especially when creating multiple deals, showing the withdrawal address makes it easier to keep track.
Press the info icon
(i) next to the Deal Details popup header.
We intentionally didn't pack too much data into a single popup to avoid overwhelming the user and shifting the focus.
Test: does it work to Cancel an Offer after selling part of it? My 115 XMR > BTC transaction sold 5 XMR, and had about 110 XMR remaining. I clicked Cancel: this worked as expected.
I've created a new 100 XMR > BTC offer in case someone wants to test buying them.
Thanks for testing this feature.
Test: what happens if I deposit 30 seconds before "Time Left to Deposit" runs out, and click "Confirm Deposit" 20 seconds before the timer runs out but also before my deposit is confirmed? Result: Deposit timeout. I think this is a concern: if the deposit needs to be confirmed within the hour, many deposits will timeout when on-chain transaction fees rise. I've seen Bitcoin transactions take days or even weeks.
In most cases, 30 minutes is enough for BTC to receive at least one blockchain confirmation.
I think this part will naturally improve based on user feedback after release if any issues arise.
Test: What happens if I send the transaction AFTER clicking "Confirm Deposit"? Deposit timeout.
Is there no way to automate this part? If users have to manually confirm their deposit, I kinda expect that to go wrong quite a lot.
If a user can't complete two simple steps:
1. Deposit the required funds into the designated buffer wallet, and
2. Press the Confirm Deposit button
then this user probably shouldn't be on our platform.
I accepted BTC > XMR Offer ID: 3e413b21-f07f-4ab8-ab39-2bcbf71eb2ef. I sent BTC, and after 1 confirmation I received my XMR!
I tried again:
I accepted BTC > XMR Offer ID: cd94c64f-3456-40c0-a816-99f1631dc4d0. I sent BTC, and with 4 confirmations, it's still "PARTIALLY CONFIRMED" and I haven't received XMR yet. Until now, when I funded My Offers, it would require 7 confirmations for BTC, so I assume that's the case again. But why did the previous Offer need only 1 confirmation?
We will reduce the required BTC confirmations to 2 or 3. I will finalize this with my teammate after we finish fixing the current bugs.
11. Post 66142822 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 13:33:01 CET 2025) in User snuffman8 spread false/fake information on technical board:
This post belongs in this topic:
Are you really afraid of quantum computers? And do you think using a fresh address would prevent you from being compromised through quantum computers? I don't think so
Yeah I already tagged him. He's shitposting and spreading FUD in many places, it is not just limited to that board.
12. Post 66142276 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Sun Dec 7 10:03:19 CET 2025) in Question about alts: same payout address = automatic tag?:
There are also some instant exchanges and other services which reuse deposit addresses for multiple users.
I can confirm this. I've seen it a couple of years ago on an instant exchange, and they could very well still be doing this. I don't use them very often anymore to know for sure.
Can anyone give example exchange that actually does such thing? I don't expect any exchange would do it since it complicate their deposit and refund system, unless they process deposit and refund manually.
13. Post 66139540 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 16:00:19 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
Yeah, but you rant about AI on a thread caused by shitposts out of human asses. Overwhelming logic.
Have you seen the topic title?
Yes, not only have I seen the topic title, but I've also taken it apart, as well as posting an AI-generated response in this thread that is objectively of much higher quality than the responses out of human asses that the OP thinks are AI. But since you lose all your rationality when the word AI appears, and you have a lot of it, it seems that you haven't noticed.
Apart from the fact that the other part of the title asks whether Bitcoin is dead. Coming from someone who has been on the forum since 2011, it sounds like trolling. Come on, if you tell me that account has been taken over by an AI bot to generate traffic with absurd controversies, I'll believe you.
14. Post 66137548 (unedited backup) (by Xiestar) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 02:56:37 CET 2025) in Seeking Opinions on Multi Account Cases Across Different Signature Campaigns:
It only means that you should start improving your own post quality instead of blaming them for taking spot on different signature campaign.
I already raised this issue before concerning multiple account. If multiple account user taking more spot against other user only means that post quality of other user is in low quality.
For example, if LoyceV, Nutildah and other constructive poster own 5 accounts each, even on their worst they still have deeper knowledge to create constructive post than most of shit poster in the forum.
Who do you think is much better to choose? Shit poster just because they own only 1 account or multiple account that create much better post?
Instead of wasting time on envying them why not improve our own post. Manager is partially at fault here if they are enrolling alt farming account just by relying on merit count instead of post quality. They are being paid to check the quality of each poster instead of relying to “alt buster”.
15. Post 66137546 (unedited backup) (by Xiestar) (scraped on Sat Dec 6 02:55:43 CET 2025) in Alt farm or what?:
It only means that you should start improving your own post quality instead of blaming them for taking spot on different signature campaign.
I already raised this issue before concerning multiple account. If multiple account user taking more spot against other user only means that post quality of other user is in low quality.
For example, if LoyceV, Nutildah and other constructive poster own 5 accounts each, even on their worst they still have deeper knowledge to create constructive poster own than most of shit poster in the forum.
Who do you think is much better to choose? Shit poster just because they own only 1 account or multiple account that create much better post?
Instead of wasting time on envying them why not improve our own post. Manager is partially at fault here if they are enrolling alt farming account just by relying on merit count instead of post quality. They are being paid to check the quality of each poster instead of relying to “alt buster”.
16. Post 66136794 (unedited backup) (by KingsDen) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 22:06:19 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
and the replies that follow then convince me that the forum isn't mostly populated by mindless bots now.
I'm not going to convince you, and already had 2 of the users that responded on Ignore. I've been "complaining" about the lack of punishment for plagiarism and AI for years now, and largely gave up reporting them. If it takes more effort to report a chatbot spammer than it takes for him to spam, it's a lost cause if they don't get banned on sight. If Mods just delete the reported posts but let the user continue, I just click Ignore and move on. This may very well destroy Bitcointalk as we know it.
I don't know how things changed so fast. I mean when I joined the forum 2021, not quite long. There was this great fear of being banned. The fastest way to get yourself banned is;
- Plagerism
- Spamming
- Spreading malware
But these days, I don't think that people are even banned anymore because I don't seem to see much ban appeal threads in the meta board. The forum has become so lenient.
17. Post 66136580 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 21:09:19 CET 2025) in Security flaws of this setup:
How is that possible? Are you comparing brand new top of the line laptops to very old cars?
I'll try to give an example: I just went to the apple.com website
~
I searched for a very popular random car in Brazil, it's from 2008 if I'm not mistaken.
So you do actually compare an expensive new laptop to a 17 years old car.
I think I can do that here too:
the first Apple laptop I found costs €1829. For less than that, I can buy a 2008
Opel Astra,
Volvo V30,
Peugeot 308 or
Citroen C4 Picasso. But I'm not buying either one of those: I wouldn't want an Apple laptop, and those cars are cheap to buy because they're expensive to own (taxes, insurance, fuel consumption and maintenance). In reality, I've bought recent model good quality second hand laptops for less than a full tank of gas. Not Apple, but IBM, Dell, Lenovo or HP. I can recommend anyone involved in Bitcoin to gain some experience with offline signing or just separating insecure software from your real system.
I think the problem is that you are comparing to an apple laptop.
Why use apple ? You will pay 10x the price of the same hardware...
You can get cheap laptop in amazon for like 250 usd.l here in Brazil.
https://a.co/d/fOJagvUI never had an apple product. Even if I had 10mi in cash .. just not worth it imo
18. Post 66136202 (unedited backup) (by Forsyth Jones) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 19:28:07 CET 2025) in Security flaws of this setup:
How is that possible? Are you comparing brand new top of the line laptops to very old cars?
I'll try to give an example: I just went to the apple.com website and I'll use the following products as a basis:
MacBook Pro 14 M5 | $1,599.00 | R$ 8620.21 - converting to the rrazilian national currency (R$ - Real) R$ 8620.21 (Without taxes, because if we import from the USA, the risk of being taxed is very high, possibly up to 60% of the product value plus other taxes).
Out of curiosity, do you mind tell of you example of the laptop and popular car? You don't need to disclose where you live.
And when you say top-tier laptop, do you mean something like
Apple laptop with most expensive option that cost $7000+?
The current minimum wage here is R$1,518 ($281), yes, that's the ridiculous minimum wage in brazil that the average brazilian earns at the end of the month (usually, most people receive their salaries once a month).
Here, the same product sold internally costs ~R$15,000 ($2782) on the most famous marketplaces (buying from the Apple Store Brazil website, the same product can easily cost 70% or even double the price).
For a Brazilian to buy this product, they would have to work for about 10 months just to buy a premium notebook like this (that's if they don't spend on anything else, not even food, meaning you can add more months).
Since the M4 isn't available on Apple Store, I went to Ebay.com and these are the prices:
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/05/UTaO1m.png ,
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/05/UTaWWW.png - To avoid making the post too long and taking up even more of your screen, I've only included the links.
Here in Brazil, Apple products like iPhones and laptops cost on average about 40% - 60% more than products from other brands, even if they are used. A regular non-Apple laptop is a little cheaper than the examples I mentioned, but it doesn't change much.
Here in brazil, a used car, somewhat modern and well-maintained, can easily cost R$15,000 ($2782) if the person is in a hurry to sell it.
As you can see in the
image below, I searched for a very popular random car in Brazil, it's from 2008 if I'm not mistaken. You can see that it costs a little over R$15,000.
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/12/05/UTX2Av.pngFor Brazilians, a popular car like this isn't seen as an antique; the majority of the population owns cars from between 2005 and 2013, especially in smaller cities. You can ask bitmover and he'll tell you the same.
Sorry for going off-topic, but it's thanks to BTC that I now have more intermediate-to-premium laptops. Just this week I bought a used, but well-maintained laptop for my mother, and I'm going to try to teach her the basics to navigate on Linux.
19. Post 66135831 (unedited backup) (by philipma1957) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 17:47:50 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
and the replies that follow then convince me that the forum isn't mostly populated by mindless bots now.
I'm not going to convince you, and already had 2 of the users that responded on Ignore. I've been "complaining" about the lack of punishment for plagiarism and AI for years now, and largely gave up reporting them. If it takes more effort to report a chatbot spammer than it takes for him to spam, it's a lost cause if they don't get banned on sight. If Mods just delete the reported posts but let the user continue, I just click Ignore and move on. This may very well destroy Bitcointalk as we know it.
bitcointalk is old.
btc is old.
wtf well 2009 to 2026 = 17 years
and in the digital world 17 years is old.
What is new?
1) stand alone wallets nope
2) software wallets nope
3) governments attacking BTC nope
4) governments praising BTC nope
5) mining at home nope
6) mining with space heating in mind nope
7) hacks nope
8 ) btc encryption may be hacked by ai nope
9) fees raised nope
10) fees lowered nope
11) new laws this could be new as there are more laws every year
fast list above and there are more things to be added to it.
but the fact is crypto is not that new.
the best hope for bct is a real new happens to talk about.
how about this four year cycles are dead?
20. Post 66135820 (unedited backup) (by OutOfMemory) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 17:45:13 CET 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Spain wants to ban encryption entirely.
SOURCE?!
I've seen brainfarts like that before, usually from politicians who think "encryption is used by criminals" and don't understand we'd be in the dark ages without encryption.
Politicians usually aren't experts. Most times they are depending on the latter, and sometimes those are dumb or corrupted, but the harm done by decisions without relying on expertise is generally worse. Spain did get in the headlines with questionable measures and statements lately, so i would not doubt the statement itself.
Call me oldfashioned (*insert old-fart-behind-computer-screen-meme here*), but i'd like to know sources which tell me more about origins and backgrounds.
Last not least: More often than not, context is key.
This seems to be from the video that told the guy who feels free inside his house, who faithfully believes in the government, and he didn't want to know about it, so I feel obliged to put the source here.
I did a quick search, and the source was from Wired, but other outlets resonated...
Leaked Government Document Shows Spain Wants to Ban End-to-End Encryption
In response to an EU proposal to scan private messages for illegal material, the country's officials said it is “imperative that we have access to the data.”
Spain has advocated banning encryption for hundreds of millions of people within the European Union, according to a leaked document obtained by WIRED that reveals strong support among EU member states for proposals to scan private messages for illegal content
.In the video I posted, which is recent, things like this are being discussed, but the news is from 2023... context really explains more in itself than the news.
.Other sources also commented on Wired's news>
Spain Calls for Total EU Ban on Encrypted Messaging
. Fifteen member states are in favor of extending the EU’s upcoming surveillance law to end-to-end encryption, while Spain would outright ban it in the entire EU.
Spain’s position on the EU’s proposed Chat Control regulation is even more extreme than the Commission’s, as the country has been calling for a complete EU-wide ban on end-to-end encryption technology used by popular messaging apps, according to a document leaked to Wired earlier this month.
The so-called Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR), dubbed Chat Control by critics, would force service providers to scan the private messages of Europeans, both texts and pictures, in an effort to clamp down on the dissemination of illicit content linked to child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). Messages and media, including audio and video files, that draw suspicion of the automated scanning system would be flagged and then sent to a central database for further investigation.
Naturally, the proposal prompted waves of backlash directed at the Commission, with critics (including human rights NGOs and watchdogs dealing with digital freedom) calling Chat Control a clear violation of the fundamental right to privacy, raising serious doubts about its efficacy in achieving what it set out to, and even pointing out its ambiguous support among stakeholders who were consulted, such as child protection agencies and the teenagers themselves.
According to the Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer, perhaps the loudest opponent of the proposal in Brussels (with whom we had a detailed interview), the main problem is that there is still not enough awareness of this legislation among the general population to put up a meaningful resistance. “If [European] citizens were aware of Chat Control, the debate would be tremendous,” he told The European Conservative.
To add another layer, the draft proposal also includes the scanning of messages protected by end-to-end encryption, which is deployed by many popular messaging apps and is used by millions every day, including WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram, which is the primary subject of the leaked document obtained by Wired.
For his part, Breyer believes that this amendment will be dropped during EU negotiations, but it’s still interesting to see where countries stand with the idea. Or, rather, where they stood in mid-April, when the survey, sent out by the European Council, was dated.
The document detailing the position of 20 EU member states revealed that the majority are in favor of scanning the private correspondence of European citizens, and most of them support extending the measure to encrypted communication as well. Among them, the Spanish socialist government appears to be the one that would like to go one step further in dealing with encrypted information, proposing to ban the whole technology in the EU.
“Ideally, in our view, it would be desirable to legislatively prevent EU-based service providers from implementing end-to-end encryption,” the Spanish position in the document says, later adding that “It is imperative that we have access to the data … and it is equally imperative that we have the capacity to analyze them, no matter how large the volume.”
Of the 20 countries whose views have been compiled in the document, 15 also favor including encrypted communication under the scope of the law. Many of them identified encrypted messaging services as the primary channel for dissemination of CSEM and recommended that the final law should include clear wording to make sure companies comply.
Some countries, including Denmark, Ireland, and the Netherlands, signaled support for scanning encrypted messages, but would also add further measures to protect the end-to-end encryption of these apps from weakening. This a noble sentiment, but cybersecurity experts say it’s technically impossible to do both.
“They want to keep the security of encryption whilst being able to circumvent it … they want privacy but they also want to indiscriminately scan encrypted communications,” Ella Jakubowska, a senior policy advisor at the European Digital Rights (EDRi) said, adding that she is “unsurprised but nevertheless shocked” at some EU member states’ “really shallow understanding” of the technology they would like to regulate.
Others, such as Germany, Italy, Finland, and Estonia, were not as convinced as the majority that the benefits of being able to scan encrypted messages outweigh the potential harm of weakening the entire system and putting the user at risk of being hacked by malicious actors or prompting service providers to leave the European market.
These responses “demonstrate a more comprehensive understanding of the stakes in the CSA regulation discussions,” said Riana Pfefferkorn, a research scholar at Stanford University’s Internet Observatory. “The regulation will not only affect criminal investigations for a specific set of offenses; it affects governments’ own data security, national security, and the privacy and data protection rights of their citizens, as well as innovation and economic development.”
Incredibly stupid.
So they would open Spain's industry to espionage. Not even to speak about putting an end to democracy, because they could spy on every oppositional politician. This ban will never get through. Even if it would, masses of intellectuals would leave the EU. The same mess that happened when the Nazis started to mess around in Germany.
The EU is quite aware about member states going the Nazi route, with Hungary being it's recent blind spot, but the majority of states are actually moving to the right slowly.
However, that's how things go when you got too much Rioja in your blood...
21. Post 66135566 (unedited backup) (by OsaiEmma) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 16:39:01 CET 2025) in Sorry but why are newbies prohibited from the serious discussion board?:
There is also nothing there for you to discuss, varieties of Boards that will help newbies, why so interested in that Board?
I don't think you're the right person to decide what and where is there for me to discuss or not. To be clear, I don't think there is anyone who can ever decide it except for myself.
Instead of forcing it, just try and earn 1 merit and you will be okay to post in the serious discussion board. So, it's all in your hands now.
This is the most funny thing I've heard today, how do u earn merits? Someone can post engage and all for over a year and still won't be able to earn a single merit.
What are the importance of being a so called "leader" here in the forum, what responsibilities do they have towards the junior members, ever since I joined, I haven't benefited any single tyn from any "senior member", except for some like fillippone (that created a merit thread to give out merit to help newbies), NotATether(who did the same by running nodes), LoyceV(who allows u to post merit worthy post to be merited).
At least, these guys encourages newbies and help them grow in the forum
22. Post 66135362 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 15:46:07 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
This will make it less likely, but not impossible to occur: my transaction must have had about 145 inputs, and it's possible for a user to have collected more small inputs.
Everything is possible, which is why we need more time for a deeper investigation.
I won't claim I know much about Monero's internal workings, but I found this:
So the transaction splitting function is not an anonymity thing, it's due to the dynamic block size limiter. Right now testnet is on the block median, and you're trying to create a transaction that is much larger than that block limit.
-- fluffyponyza, Dec 14, 2016
Based on the above, it could be this is much less likely to occur on real Monero than on testnet.
We also assume that the Monero GUI splits transactions more frequently on testnets than on mainnet, but we want to verify this. Even after the Beta ends, we will publish our research here and make sure to mention you.
I've Cancelled Offer ID: cafac829-b0fc-4fc2-a2a3-5863eaff6204, and received a return payment:
Inputs:
4783950x24x1 tb1q4dnrml9y4czawmgvjyvf7gp34gups4fwel72m7 0.003117
Outputs:
358cac89d9:0 tb1q6hlep3yytgv6q0dl8uuj932y9hvhwnqqzvhza5 0.00311248
358cac89d9:1 tb1q7nqts63qz0w8j5k97jwprsupsaxwg8q3j9sndv 0.00000311
So the refund went to the first address I sent from. If I would have sent this from an exchange, the rollback would be lost for me.
We will figure out where to place a warning message advising users not to send funds directly from an exchange and to use a native wallet temporarily.
When I Canceled my Offer, Bridgoro took a fee. Is that as intended? If so: Let's say a user creates an Offer, and nobody buys it. After a few days, he Cancels his offer to get his money back (and try elsewhere). If he still has to pay a fee for an Offer that wasn't sold, he's going to be very disappointed and probably won't return.
The fee that was deducted is used strictly for the network fee.
I tried underfunding a transaction again. Now I receive this email:
Dear Seller,
We have detected an underpayment for your offer. The partially confirmed deposit amount is less than the required amount.
~
Your transaction will be refunded shortly once we receive all the confirmations. Next time, please make sure to send the exact amount you specified when creating the offer.
Works fine now
Yeah, we prioritize fixing minor bugs first since they take less time to resolve.
Have you tried how the platform behaves in case of RBF use?
If you mean Replace-by-Fee, then yeah that's a good point!
This also needs to be tested.
What happens if the Bridgoro platform recognises a transaction on the blockchain, which is later replaced by a new one?
Is the order ID linked to the TX ID, or to the amount of deposited coins after 1st confirmation?
As I say, I didn't test, I don't even have testnet coins now, I see that LoyceV a.k.a. LauraV is in the process of testing.
Just ignore if this has already been discussed.
The confirmed amount on the blockchain cannot be replaced.
23. Post 66135276 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 15:21:07 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
I tried underfunding a transaction again. Now I receive this email:
Dear Seller,
We have detected an underpayment for your offer. The partially confirmed deposit amount is less than the required amount.
~
Your transaction will be refunded shortly once we receive all the confirmations. Next time, please make sure to send the exact amount you specified when creating the offer.
Works fine now
Have you tried how the platform behaves in case of RBF use? What happens if the Bridgoro platform recognises a transaction on the blockchain, which is later replaced by a new one?
Is the order ID linked to the TX ID, or to the amount of deposited coins after 1st confirmation?
As I say, I didn't test, I don't even have testnet coins now, I see that LoyceV a.k.a. LauraV is in the process of testing.
Just ignore if this has already been discussed.
24. Post 66135208 (unedited backup) (by PostQuantumBTC) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 14:59:55 CET 2025) in running a Bitcoin Node is a huge benefit for Bitcoin and us.:
I guess the thread suggest the benefits of running bitcoin node, which is very important, however, this also may require some little of more of technical procedures, but not too complicated to run, once the process is followed strictly, also, another demand is the kind of device to be used, the space it requires and the internet connectivity it may also demanded form us, which i see all as gain if one can understand how to run it.
These are the starting requirements, you still need constant internet to run a node, the megabyte needed to receiving and sending blockchain information like valid new blocks and transactions is not high. See what some users posted about the bytes that full node is consuming
My full node used to upload about 2 TB per month. There's no fixed number for this.
Current specs since August 23:
"totalbytesrecv": 44973468250,
"totalbytessent": 1827279238373
I can provide two more data points of two of my full nodes that run 24/7 and are only restarted when an OS update needs a reboot which is not often required on Ubuntu and Raspian (derived from Debian). Both nodes have no restrictions on amount of uploaded data, i.e.
maxuploadtarget=0
Both nodes connect only via Tor and .onion addresses to other nodes.
Node A (older ThinkPad laptop with 16GiB RAM and two SSDs as storage media)
Uptime (taken a few seconds after querying
getnettotals): 1,899,532 seconds (almost 22 days)
"totalbytesrecv": 11772103012,
"totalbytessent": 137906099190
Node B (Raspi 4B, 8GiB RAM, uses a HDD as storage media)
Uptime: 24,713,930 seconds (~286.0409 days)
"totalbytesrecv": 162439719241,
"totalbytessent": 547966652842
My internet connection has ~106MBit downstream and ~44MBit upstream, very stable, commonly no disconnects/reconnects for months. Throughput capacity is also stable, only tested with downloads and uploads of max. few hundreds of GiB though, but those were able to saturate my line limits at my line's max. With enough download or upload parallel streams my line saturated at my max. values without noticeable fluctuations. TL;DR stable internet connection that provides its max capacities without ups and downs.
My monthly Internet is limited, having a full node may not be for everyone but if able to have it, it is a very good thing as I will not have to depend on centralized servers.
25. Post 66135018 (unedited backup) (by ESG) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 14:08:19 CET 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Spain wants to ban encryption entirely.
SOURCE?!
I've seen brainfarts like that before, usually from politicians who think "encryption is used by criminals" and don't understand we'd be in the dark ages without encryption.
Politicians usually aren't experts. Most times they are depending on the latter, and sometimes those are dumb or corrupted, but the harm done by decisions without relying on expertise is generally worse. Spain did get in the headlines with questionable measures and statements lately, so i would not doubt the statement itself.
Call me oldfashioned (*insert old-fart-behind-computer-screen-meme here*), but i'd like to know sources which tell me more about origins and backgrounds.
Last not least: More often than not, context is key.
This seems to be from the video that told the guy who feels free inside his house, who faithfully believes in the government, and he didn't want to know about it, so I feel obliged to put the source here.
I did a quick search, and the source was from Wired, but other outlets resonated...
Leaked Government Document Shows Spain Wants to Ban End-to-End Encryption
In response to an EU proposal to scan private messages for illegal material, the country's officials said it is “imperative that we have access to the data.”
Spain has advocated banning encryption for hundreds of millions of people within the European Union, according to a leaked document obtained by WIRED that reveals strong support among EU member states for proposals to scan private messages for illegal content
.In the video I posted, which is recent, things like this are being discussed, but the news is from 2023... context really explains more in itself than the news.
.Other sources also commented on Wired's news>
Spain Calls for Total EU Ban on Encrypted Messaging
. Fifteen member states are in favor of extending the EU’s upcoming surveillance law to end-to-end encryption, while Spain would outright ban it in the entire EU.
Spain’s position on the EU’s proposed Chat Control regulation is even more extreme than the Commission’s, as the country has been calling for a complete EU-wide ban on end-to-end encryption technology used by popular messaging apps, according to a document leaked to Wired earlier this month.
The so-called Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR), dubbed Chat Control by critics, would force service providers to scan the private messages of Europeans, both texts and pictures, in an effort to clamp down on the dissemination of illicit content linked to child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). Messages and media, including audio and video files, that draw suspicion of the automated scanning system would be flagged and then sent to a central database for further investigation.
Naturally, the proposal prompted waves of backlash directed at the Commission, with critics (including human rights NGOs and watchdogs dealing with digital freedom) calling Chat Control a clear violation of the fundamental right to privacy, raising serious doubts about its efficacy in achieving what it set out to, and even pointing out its ambiguous support among stakeholders who were consulted, such as child protection agencies and the teenagers themselves.
According to the Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer, perhaps the loudest opponent of the proposal in Brussels (with whom we had a detailed interview), the main problem is that there is still not enough awareness of this legislation among the general population to put up a meaningful resistance. “If [European] citizens were aware of Chat Control, the debate would be tremendous,” he told The European Conservative.
To add another layer, the draft proposal also includes the scanning of messages protected by end-to-end encryption, which is deployed by many popular messaging apps and is used by millions every day, including WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram, which is the primary subject of the leaked document obtained by Wired.
For his part, Breyer believes that this amendment will be dropped during EU negotiations, but it’s still interesting to see where countries stand with the idea. Or, rather, where they stood in mid-April, when the survey, sent out by the European Council, was dated.
The document detailing the position of 20 EU member states revealed that the majority are in favor of scanning the private correspondence of European citizens, and most of them support extending the measure to encrypted communication as well. Among them, the Spanish socialist government appears to be the one that would like to go one step further in dealing with encrypted information, proposing to ban the whole technology in the EU.
“Ideally, in our view, it would be desirable to legislatively prevent EU-based service providers from implementing end-to-end encryption,” the Spanish position in the document says, later adding that “It is imperative that we have access to the data … and it is equally imperative that we have the capacity to analyze them, no matter how large the volume.”
Of the 20 countries whose views have been compiled in the document, 15 also favor including encrypted communication under the scope of the law. Many of them identified encrypted messaging services as the primary channel for dissemination of CSEM and recommended that the final law should include clear wording to make sure companies comply.
Some countries, including Denmark, Ireland, and the Netherlands, signaled support for scanning encrypted messages, but would also add further measures to protect the end-to-end encryption of these apps from weakening. This a noble sentiment, but cybersecurity experts say it’s technically impossible to do both.
“They want to keep the security of encryption whilst being able to circumvent it … they want privacy but they also want to indiscriminately scan encrypted communications,” Ella Jakubowska, a senior policy advisor at the European Digital Rights (EDRi) said, adding that she is “unsurprised but nevertheless shocked” at some EU member states’ “really shallow understanding” of the technology they would like to regulate.
Others, such as Germany, Italy, Finland, and Estonia, were not as convinced as the majority that the benefits of being able to scan encrypted messages outweigh the potential harm of weakening the entire system and putting the user at risk of being hacked by malicious actors or prompting service providers to leave the European market.
These responses “demonstrate a more comprehensive understanding of the stakes in the CSA regulation discussions,” said Riana Pfefferkorn, a research scholar at Stanford University’s Internet Observatory. “The regulation will not only affect criminal investigations for a specific set of offenses; it affects governments’ own data security, national security, and the privacy and data protection rights of their citizens, as well as innovation and economic development.”
26. Post 66134999 (unedited backup) (by apogio) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 14:03:19 CET 2025) in LoyceV's Avatar for Rent [first 🦊YEAR🦊 (84 weeks) rented out]:
What did I just see?
Hey, am I the only one who didn't catch that?
27. Post 66134955 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 13:50:43 CET 2025) in LoyceV's Avatar for Rent [first 🦊YEAR🦊 (84 weeks) rented out]:
What did I just see?
28. Post 66134859 (unedited backup) (by OutOfMemory) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 13:19:07 CET 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
Spain wants to ban encryption entirely.
SOURCE?!
I've seen brainfarts like that before, usually from politicians who think "encryption is used by criminals" and don't understand we'd be in the dark ages without encryption.
Politicians usually aren't experts. Most times they are depending on the latter, and sometimes those are dumb or corrupted, but the harm done by decisions without relying on expertise is generally worse. Spain did get in the headlines with questionable measures and statements lately, so i would not doubt the statement itself.
Call me oldfashioned (*insert old-fart-behind-computer-screen-meme here*), but i'd like to know sources which tell me more about origins and backgrounds.
Last not least: More often than not, context is key.
29. Post 66134628 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 11:47:50 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
Thanks, I'm LEVEL 4 now. Let's test what happens if I deposit 250 XMR from Monero GUI Wallet, which I mined in chunks of about 0.7925 XMR each. When I send 250 XMR (in 1 transaction), my wallet splits it into 3 transactions:
Unfortunately, Bridgoro only picks up one deposit:
I did not receive an "Offer Underpaid" email.
Considering Bridgoro didn't pick up on the full amount, I expected it to return the 115.093352523206 XMR (based on the following quote), but that didn't happen:
My offer for 115.09~ XMR is now available on Bridgoro. This looks like a bug: when it's fixed, I can test it again.
So, we are still investigating this issue, but as promised, we want to share some preliminary details about what we have uncovered so far and briefly explain how the system works and how we plan to address it.The exchange mechanism is designed so that the buffer wallet counts only one incoming transaction and compares it against the on-chain balance. It's also hardcoded to calculate fees based on just two operations: the recipient's transaction and the network fee. As we've seen, Monero has the peculiarity of splitting a single transfer into multiple outputs. The same situation will occur during the reverse payout: the recipient's fee will also be split into several outputs, but our system calculates the fee for only one outgoing transaction, not for multiple outputs.
Right now, rewriting the internal exchange logic would take several months, including extensive local testing. We initially considered adding support for crediting multiple outputs, but that approach introduces the risk of recognizing fake tokens embedded within the native coin. To avoid this, the system intentionally counts only the first transaction that will be confirmed on-chain. There are many possible solutions, and the debate can go on forever, especially around creating Monero-specific workarounds. But Bridgoro will manage real user funds, and we don't want to rely on duct tape. The system must be designed cleanly around predictable, controlled functionality.
Why did your 250 XMR offer still process but end up counting only 115 XMR instead of a rollback?
The problem is that the system confirmed the balance on the blockchain, which reflected the full 250 XMR, but it only counted the first input of 115 XMR. Because of that, there was no rollback of the 115 XMR and the remaining inputs went into the Dumb Fee category. This is a temporary solution, and any exceeded amount can be retrieved through the Collector Module after a short investigation.
The solution we've decided on for now:
We will update the logic so that the system validates the exact transaction amount, rather than relying on the total wallet balance. With this update, the transaction will be canceled when there's a mismatch, and the user will receive only the amount from the first output. Any additional inputs (second, third, etc.) will remain in the buffer as Dumb Fee, and can later be recovered through the Collector Module.
To prevent this situation in the meantime, the system will temporarily limit XMR amounts to avoid triggering multiple inputs/outputs. As a result, during the launch phase, users won't be able to exchange more than $5,000 worth of XMR at once.
If someone intentionally attempts to exploit this behavior and sends a larger transaction anyway (as you demonstrated), any resulting loss of XMR will be the user's own responsibility, since they actively bypassed the system's constraints.
Overall, everything here is still preliminary. We are continuing to research and evaluate different solutions to ensure the behavior is handled reliably and securely.
I haven't tested it, so if this has already been discussed, just ignore my comment.
For a refund, it must be possible to add another address, not the same one from which the coins were sent. Users will often send a deposit to Bridgoro directly from another exchange, where it is most often an operational hot wallet, and the refund to such an address will not end up with a specific user.
We will review this and likely implement it as well.However, since many parts of the exchange feature were hardcoded, this update will need to be addressed after the release. Rewriting and testing it locally will require additional development time.
Let's test:
When selling Monero, it asks for a "Monero Rollback Address". But when selling Bitcoin, it doesn't ask for a return address.
I've created a new Order, and sent (test) Bitcoin from these addresses:
4783615x18x0 tb1q6hlep3yytgv6q0dl8uuj932y9hvhwnqqzvhza5 0.00031652
4783799x37x0 tb1qxjlzu5vsgudzhrl7fzfngm604cntwjt848lwkr 0.00100239
4783604x18x1 tb1qy2pjce6er89ruymwcp25xyggw8pz623z54xgvh 0.00149947
4783801x31x0 tb1qt0e3gd4zzm5zxtu0taathmnr0efpjhy8m2kn3j 0.00022149
4783604x4x0 tb1qqd2zx6lcfd98pnpzn5drls780s2s46x6sxek7s 0.00014469
I'll see what happens when I Cancel my transaction when it's confirmed (which will probably take 2 hours).
I want to emphasize that your tests are currently among the most important ones for us.
30. Post 66134258 (unedited backup) (by nutildah) (scraped on Fri Dec 5 09:43:25 CET 2025) in Nutildah's Resume:
Nutildah
aka "Nutildah the Hungry”
Bitcointalk Legendary Member | Joined April 20, 2014 | Member ID: 317618
| Posts | 13,691 |
| Earned Merit | 9,240 |
| Sent Merit | 15,244 |
| BPIP Most Recognized Rank | #16 |
| Current DefaultTrust Score | +21 |
| DT1 Election Ranking | #11 (included by 92 users with 250+ merit & 15 users with 10–249 merit) |
Bitcointalk Community Awards2024 – HelpBuster (Winner)
2023 – ScamBuster (Winner)
2023 – SpamBuster (Runner-up)
Professional Experience on Bitcointalk (2014 – Present)Premier Scam Investigator & Community Protector• Recognized as one of the forum’s top “scam busters”
• Exposed hundreds of fraudulent altcoins, phishing sites, plagiarized ICOs, high-premine scams, fake exchange listings, and malicious wallets
• Directly prevented financial losses for countless members through evidence-based investigations
Pioneer & Lead Maintainer – AI-Generated Spam Combat• Created and actively maintains the
AI Spam Report Reference Thread (2023–present)
• Primary resource used by moderators and the community to fight AI spam
• Helped shape forum-wide anti-spam policies
Trusted Dispute Resolution & Flag Support Contributor• Consistently ranked in top tier of DefaultTrust (DT1)
• Trusted by major community figures (LoyceV and many others)
• Regularly assists in trust flag reviews, disputes, and scam mediations
Notable & Most Impactful Threads•
SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) – fake team member & plagiarized white paper (May 2019)
•
Long-time sig campaign farm ID’d via single wallet transaction (Feb 2021)
•
AI Spam Report Reference Thread (Jun 2023 – ongoing)
•
Old Accounts That Have Likely Been Hacked/Traded (Aug 2024 – ongoing)
•
Nutildah’s bounty cheaters & ban evaders thread (May 2021 – ongoing)
•
10,000th Post Special: 10 of my Favorite Bitcoin Forum Moments (Apr 2021)
Core Strengths• Exceptional investigative research & pattern recognition
• Meticulous evidence presentation
• Impartial and high ethical standards
• One of the most generous merit senders on the forum
• Balance of serious scam-busting and fun community engagement
31. Post 66132546 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 20:57:02 CET 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
-Yeah.. You are surely seeming like a waste of time.
... -How come I feel that I am totally wasting my time interacting with you? Perhaps wasting the time of other members in these here parts, too?
-The world in which we live are daily produced and lived by human beings, through the choices in which he makes daily, and you continue to choose to waste time, provoking what you want and at the same time complaining about what you have obtained through your choice, you need to decide my dear.
I don't have to decide. If the conditions have not been sufficiently met, then I don't have to confirm. You are really irritating.. which causes me reluctance.. Sorry to say, but that is the current status... Unconfirmed.. .and yeah, at the same time, I have wasted a decent amount of time on you, so in that sense, you have already won some aspect of your already confirmed troll objective(s).
>-I would like you to know that here on my side, to make a post like this that I usually do here, I spend a minute, and to answer you, I end up spending a little more time, about five minutes, so I have no problems with time spending, when, I have time to spend,
Yes... part of the reason that bots put out crappy and contradictory content is that they are still not advanced enough to capture some even basic aspects of human interaction nuances.
Ain't I the luckiest thing since slice-bread?
-The intention to interact with me was yours, I could very well, didnt answer u, and have done just the blablabla-post, and be posting here again whwn i dont know when..., but you chose that, what fault do I have?
Of course. You posted a bunch of crap, yet at the same time, you are completely innocent.
From my perspective, you don't really come off as innocent, so I am not going to accept your proclamation of innocence.
Below $1,000? That makes no sense. At some point, I might be willing to concede that we have transitioned into a bear market. From my perspective, we are not there yet.
-OW My MasterTroll, I Love you!! hahaha!!!
.. Yes, I see. The pig loves it.
-Well, enough blablabla, and now let's talk about something serious, it could be that I win, and it could also be that you lose, anyway, I didn't say 69.999,99, I said 70.000,00...
We disagree on another one of the terms then, so we cannot have a bet unless we agree on all of the terms. Below $70k is $69,999 (Bitstamp does not have cents.. Their trades are rounded to dollars).
and in the rest that you said is right, and thank you for being very nice to me, because as you said, the value is low, and I said it would be a symbolic value,
It is so low as to border on a waste of time...especially given the ongoing trollish and unserious way that you are conducting yourself.
anyway, thank you very much for being very good to me, I'm happy, especially coming from a guy who threatens people who make meaningless posts to negative them in the
TRUST 'System',
Feedback ,,, <<<feel free to use this link here<<<---Or, alternatively, you can open a thread to talk about me and my blablabla posts on,
reputation boardThe forum and even this thread has a high tolerance - even for a lot of shitty posts and posts that tend towards non-substantive nonsense like yours.
I am a little surprised that your profile has not been tagged yet.. so sometimes posters who might not be breaking forum rules, their profile will still end up getting tagged for the pattern of drivel that is coming from them.. Sometimes the tags are red and other times they are neutral.
Yes. Your posting style does incentivize both threatening and even a following through with threatening.
It would be better to rename trust to "trading feedback" since "trust" implies some sort of personal and mostly subjective experience.
I think we want to eliminate subjectivity entirely from this system and have it be as objective as people. If someone has bad feedback, it should be backed up with solid proof of their wrongdoing (screenshots, transaction IDs, chat logs, etc). You shouldn't be able to mess with someone's profile just because of some vague feeling of shadiness. Renaming to trading feedback shifts the focus more to one's commercial relations with a user. Accounts with no feedback can have a small and not as dramatic warning like "This user has no feedback" associated with their threads.
Yes. Of course, there is a subjective angle to both the trust system and the merit system that this forum has in place, and even if Cøbra would prefer such subjectivity to not exist in a forum like this, an absence of subjectivity is not the system that the forum currently has in place. It seems that some aspect of the subjectivity is a feature and not a bug, which might be one of the reasons that members will get annoyed with other members if they either suspect or confirm them to be bots.
Default Trust Changes>
So my question is if it is allowed to tag a person just because you don't like him? Is it allowed to tag someone because of your vendetta or something?
It's not forbidden, but it's not really the best thing to do
(unless you like dramas).The best answer is given here in the LoyceV guide :
Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility (
source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.
If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them. I think that so far in my forum history I have been pretty tolerant of even quite annoying members.. and some members consider me to be too nice. I cannot guarantee that you or your level of annoyingness might not cross over my tolerance level.
...and I doubt that whatever you are doing is even close to that level of performance.
-----....I would imagine that with your ways of assessing bitcoin, you have had a lot of times that you have been wrong in the past 7-ish years, yet you still want to be arrogant about the matter?
Maybe you have a gambling problem?....
-->you have to review this business of yours of thinking you be
guesser and know about what you don't know, you'll end up being like me... c|={D ..... maybe I've got sunshine, on a cloudy day, because, since before yestarday, are rainning here on my city, and, the bitcoin price is growing since before yestarday, it's seem like the rain dont interact with the btc price, and yhis is good, because is not need include thesses factors on maths... lol.....heheheee...
I doubt that the weather is a good excuse for your frequently deviating into stream of consciousness posting choices.
>it has nothing of Nostradammus, but proportion.
Sure. Probability and certainty are not the same thing, so having some humility in regards to the future is likely a better way of communicating with others, to the extent that you would like to be treated seriously.
----...or maybe you need to go to some kind of a school to learn maths and sciences (statistics and probabilities)?
_Maybe you could think that maybe I'm being like you are, and maybe you don't like yourself?
Maybe.
NOT. Well, I guess I'm talking about extravagant prices to you, maybe thinking you're going to get mad and act like you're acting? maybe, it could be....Perhaps or no perhaps?
- Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps...
[/b][/size]
´Perhaps , You may need to know what the difference is between>
Proportion.(Ratio) and
Probabilities - Statistics (odds).maybe u need, i dont know, perhaps?...
---
You know how to turn meaningful ideas into garble. That's what bots tend to do (at least current versions).
... I suppose that we could go on word, even though I find you to be a bit irritating and confusing and even an admitted purveyor of posts that hardly have any value.. in other words, frequently junk and even portraying yourself as unreliable.
Well, I've already proposed to you to keep my share in advance, and it would save time and money, But you insist on making it difficult.., for my part, I have my word, since you don't want to keep my part in advance, so let's get my word, and who knows if you would even use the trust system to give me positive feedback? maybe, maybe if it was a higher value... but it doesn't need to... Now if you insist on giving me feedback, whether negative or neutral, that's okay too, it's up to you.
At this point, I have lost confidence in interacting with you on this topic.
Although you find me annoying, I'm not killing you with my song, am I? Even though sometimes you can be very 'irritating' too, I don't troll you or trying to kill you with my song...
-
Well, in any case, you don't want to accept to be with my side ahead, and even though you proposed that we go to the word, to the beard hair, and suddenly you went back, I don't know, maybe...
I am not inspired by your flip-flopping stream of consciousness and your all-over-the-placedness in regards to all the irrelevant topics that you raise, and also I don't like the idea of entering a bet with an annoying bot. Yeah, I know that you are not the ONLY bot on this thread, but still.. there are limits.
...I can send you a PM, if of course you allow it, suggesting a person from here on this topic, that i believe be a good person, who I believe is trustworthy, and I believe he can accept to stay with our part and deliver it to the winner on March 1st, can it be if you don't want to go on the word?...
There is no reason to force this whole betting matter. We have already gone off the topic sufficiently in my even entertaining your various stream of consciousness tangents, and I cannot see any reason to keep going down this particular entering into a bet "waste of time" path..
32. Post 66131682 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 17:21:49 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
Pota-toes po-tatoes.
I prefer onions.
I couldn't care less if shitposts come from a chatbot or just someone's ass.
Yeah, but you rant about AI on a thread caused by shitposts out of human asses. Overwhelming logic.
Posts coming from assGPT would probably be better than 90% of the shitposts that we see here.
The ChatGPT post I quoted is objectively of much higher quality than those criticized by the OP, for starters because it replies on topic unlike the human replies. But you also have to know how to use it; a shitposter using ChatGPT will get lower quality responses than someone who knows how to use it.
33. Post 66131490 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 16:40:32 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
Thanks, I'm LEVEL 4 now. Let's test what happens if I deposit 250 XMR from Monero GUI Wallet, which I mined in chunks of about 0.7925 XMR each. When I send 250 XMR (in 1 transaction), my wallet splits it into 3 transactions:
Unfortunately, Bridgoro only picks up one deposit:
I did not receive an "Offer Underpaid" email.
Considering Bridgoro didn't pick up on the full amount, I expected it to return the 115.093352523206 XMR (based on the following quote), but that didn't happen:
My offer for 115.09~ XMR is now available on Bridgoro. This looks like a bug: when it's fixed, I can test it again.
LoyceV, you did a great job testing this issue!
Otherwise, we would have never known that such transaction splitting could occur.
I clearly see the problem now, and we need some time to conduct our own investigation on this side.
We will definitely share the results of our research and report back to everyone here once it’s completed.
34. Post 66131403 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 16:19:49 CET 2025) in Cryptomixer has been taken down:
My theory about these really strange BTC seizures when it comes to mixers is that they (the owners) are doing it on purpose.
A gentlemen's agreement to buy their way out of prison? I like your theory, but don't think it's very likely.Unless one of them admits that this is the reason, we can't know for sure - but it makes sense if we look back at all cases of mixer seizures. Those who make seizures always brag about two things, the amount of Bitcoins and the size of the data, but do you know of any mixer owner who was caught and convicted?
it also suggests to me that a very small number of individuals are behind the mixer business.
That's probably true. Why put all your eggs in one basket, if you can run multiple "independent" mixers?Given that I am active on another forum where mixers are actively advertised, I cannot escape the impression that they are all owned by a maximum of 3 to 4 different people. In the vast majority of cases, for one mix you will pay 3-5% of the amount + a fixed 70 000 satoshi on account of the miners' fee. Given that we know that the price for which you can send a BTC transaction is less than $1, the conclusion is self-evident if most mixers force such a large fee.
By the way, the most successful mixer did not have any mandatory fee, but no mixer today has chosen that option.
35. Post 66131355 (unedited backup) (by SquirrelJulietGarden) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 16:07:07 CET 2025) in Option to sort recent post by topic?:
There are quite a number of boards, which you can choose to go for, that is why they all appear in sections, it one does not suit you, then go for another x same applies to the threads as well, if you come across an unpleasing thread to you, just scroll up and look away, if all these are not enough for you, revert to the first reply from LoyceV, if that is not enough, then revert to the last one below here and click on the button you see showing this minus sign (-) highlighted, it makes you see less of the undesired board for you
It is like a temporary visual / display solution to hide some boards you dislike, but you will still receive replies to your posts in those boards. I guess it is not like you click on the - , you will ignore that board forever and all topics, posts in it.
I believe it is like you click on the - for hiding your avatar at top of a page, later you log out, log in your account again, you will see your avatar on the top of page again. Even you click on a post, after your are directed to a new page, the avatar will show again.
The solution when you want to ignore a board is tick to that board in Board Ignore Preferences.
36. Post 66131217 (unedited backup) (by Lucius) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 15:31:55 CET 2025) in Cryptomixer has been taken down:
let's forget about the 25 million in bitcoin they stole for a sec.
Let's not: this has happened so many times, and each time I'm surprised about the amount of money in their hot wallet. Are they that rich, do they care that little, or do they fund their hot wallet with coins that are so "hot" they don't care about losing it?
~snip~My theory about these really strange BTC seizures when it comes to mixers is that they (the owners) are doing it on purpose. If you're wondering what the purpose is, it seems to me that they want to avoid pressure for their possible arrest by allowing the authorities to boast that they seized a huge amount of coins, and then finding the person behind it all falls into the background.
The fact that this happens constantly may give my theory a chance, but it also suggests to me that a very small number of individuals are behind the mixer business.
37. Post 66130895 (unedited backup) (by _act_) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 14:00:49 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
I've been "complaining" about the lack of punishment for plagiarism and AI for years now, and largely gave up reporting them.
AI is the worst, I have stopped complaining on the AI thread because I noticed the post will only be deleted but there is nothing that would be done. If it is 7 days ban, it will be better. This will help in discouraging the use of AI on this forum.
If Mods just delete the reported posts but let the user continue, I just click Ignore and move on. This may very well destroy Bitcointalk as we know it.
A good example is
HomoHerectus
38. Post 66130862 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 13:52:02 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
None of those users are using AI
Pota-toes po-tatoes. I couldn't care less if shitposts come from a chatbot or just someone's ass.
Posts coming from assGPT would probably be better than 90% of the shitposts that we see here.
39. Post 66130798 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 13:29:37 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
and the replies that follow then convince me that the forum isn't mostly populated by mindless bots now.
I'm not going to convince you, and already had 2 of the users that responded on Ignore. I've been "complaining" about the lack of punishment for plagiarism and AI for years now, and largely gave up reporting them. If it takes more effort to report a chatbot spammer than it takes for him to spam, it's a lost cause if they don't get banned on sight. If Mods just delete the reported posts but let the user continue, I just click Ignore and move on. This may very well destroy Bitcointalk as we know it.
Have you even visited the thread linked in the OP? None of those users are using AI and actually my quoted AI reply is much better that what they are saying.
I don't know, man, my impression is that you're so blinded by this issue that that every time AI is discussed, all your rationality disappears.
He doesn't need to. Both issues are happening on this forum simultaneously. There are plenty of cases where AI people were let to continue their spam. Here is my
last report. It is 100% confirmed, and the user is still active and posting. I don't think I will report like that again unless I am really bored, it is a waste of time.
40. Post 66130785 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 13:24:13 CET 2025) in Is BCT dead and most of the traffic just mindless AI zombies now?:
and the replies that follow then convince me that the forum isn't mostly populated by mindless bots now.
I'm not going to convince you, and already had 2 of the users that responded on Ignore. I've been "complaining" about the lack of punishment for plagiarism and AI for years now, and largely gave up reporting them. If it takes more effort to report a chatbot spammer than it takes for him to spam, it's a lost cause if they don't get banned on sight. If Mods just delete the reported posts but let the user continue, I just click Ignore and move on. This may very well destroy Bitcointalk as we know it.
Have you even visited the thread linked in the OP? None of those users are using AI and actually my quoted AI reply is much better that what they are saying.
I don't know, man, my impression is that you're so blinded by this issue that that every time AI is discussed, all your rationality disappears.
41. Post 66130574 (unedited backup) (by Doan9269) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 12:15:49 CET 2025) in Option to sort recent post by topic?:
There are quite a number of boards, which you can choose to go for, that is why they all appear in sections, it one does not suit you, then go for another x same applies to the threads as well, if you come across an unpleasing thread to you, just scroll up and look away, if all these are not enough for you, revert to the first reply from LoyceV, if that is not enough, then revert to the last one below here and click on the button you see showing this minus sign (-) highlighted, it makes you see less of the undesired board for you.
42. Post 66129943 (unedited backup) (by ESG) (scraped on Thu Dec 4 08:51:49 CET 2025) in Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion:
_BuddY, on last tueday two, you open the day on 86290, then you gor for high92330, letting the lower on 86190 and closing the day on 91300, yestarday, you open on 91303, reaching 94172 highs, when you close on 93472, and today you open in93460, with the max on 94086 going to the lower up to now, in 92696, if in this latest twodays you did beautys high-pivots, why not today you can reach a new high like 96800, then up to sunday U Could climbing up to 103?, good idea to last day of the full-moon?, but, u can give i bite on the moon, and keep climbing more andmore?, ... ow, do what u want, your service here is of the best!!! Thanks Buddy...from the deep of my heart!
-Yeah.. You are surely seeming like a waste of time.
...
-How come I feel that I am totally wasting my time interacting with you? Perhaps wasting the time of other members in these here parts, too?
-The world in which we live are daily produced and lived by human beings, through the choices in which he makes daily, and you continue to choose to waste time, provoking what you want and at the same time complaining about what you have obtained through your choice, you need to decide my dear.
>
-I would like you to know that here on my side, to make a post like this that I usually do here, I spend a minute, and to answer you, I end up spending a little more time, about five minutes, so I have no problems with time spending, when, I have time to spend, enjoy, I'm out of time, but I decided to spend a little more than five minutes with you today.
-The intention to interact with me was yours, I could very well, didnt answer u, and have done just the blablabla-post, and be posting here again whwn i dont know when..., but you chose that, what fault do I have? To answer you? don't come with this blame on me when you were the one who chose to waste your time, and still make the other members here also waste time, and the worst, because of your waste of time, we are putting the people who read this that both you and I are writing, in doubt, but I can guarantee you that the bitcoin price trend is up, Unless the price goes below 1000 USD, then I might think we're in a bear market!!
-
-OW My MasterTroll, I Love you!! hahaha!!!
.
==============================#==============================
-Well, enough blablabla, and now let's talk about something serious, it could be that I win, and it could also be that you lose, anyway, I didn't say 69,000.00, I said 70,000.00...and in the rest that you said is right, and thank you for being very nice to me, because as you said, the value is low, and I said it would be a symbolic value, anyway, thank you very much for being very good to me, I'm happy, especially coming from a guy who threatens people who make meaningless posts to negative them in the
TRUST 'System',
Feedback ,,, <<<feel free to use this link here<<<---Or, alternatively, you can open a thread to talk about me and my blablabla posts on,
reputation board>>>
The forum and even this thread has a high tolerance - even for a lot of shitty posts and posts that tend towards non-substantive nonsense like yours.
I am a little surprised that your profile has not been tagged yet.. so sometimes posters who might not be breaking forum rules, their profile will still end up getting tagged for the pattern of drivel that is coming from them.. Sometimes the tags are red and other times they are neutral.
>>>
It would be better to rename trust to "trading feedback" since "trust" implies some sort of personal and mostly subjective experience.
I think we want to eliminate subjectivity entirely from this system and have it be as objective as people. If someone has bad feedback, it should be backed up with solid proof of their wrongdoing (screenshots, transaction IDs, chat logs, etc). You shouldn't be able to mess with someone's profile just because of some vague feeling of shadiness. Renaming to trading feedback shifts the focus more to one's commercial relations with a user. Accounts with no feedback can have a small and not as dramatic warning like "This user has no feedback" associated with their threads.
Default Trust Changes>
So my question is if it is allowed to tag a person just because you don't like him? Is it allowed to tag someone because of your vendetta or something?
It's not forbidden, but it's not really the best thing to do
(unless you like dramas).The best answer is given here in the LoyceV guide :
Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility (
source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.
If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.
...and I doubt that whatever you are doing is even close to that level of performance.
-----
....I would imagine that with your ways of assessing bitcoin, you have had a lot of times that you have been wrong in the past 7-ish years, yet you still want to be arrogant about the matter?
Maybe you have a gambling problem?....
-->you have to review this business of yours of thinking you be
guesser and know about what you don't know, you'll end up being like me... c|={D ..... maybe I've got sunshine, on a cloudy day, because, since before yestarday, are rainning here on my city, and, the bitcoin price is growing since before yestarday, it's seem like the rain dont interact with the btc price, and yhis is good, because is not need include thesses factors on maths... lol.....heheheee...
>it has nothing of Nostradammus, but proportion.
Sure. Probability and certainty are not the same thing, so having some humility in regards to the future is likely a better way of communicating with others, to the extent that you would like to be treated seriously.
----
...or maybe you need to go to some kind of a school to learn maths and sciences (statistics and probabilities)?
.
-
_Maybe you could think that maybe I'm being like you are, and maybe you don't like yourself? Well, I guess I'm talking about extravagant prices to you, maybe thinking you're going to get mad and act like you're acting? maybe, it could be....Perhaps or no perhaps?
- Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps...
´Perhaps , You may need to know what the difference is between>
.maybe u need, i dont know, perhaps?...
---
---
...
I suppose that we could go on word, even though I find you to be a bit irritating and confusing and even an admitted purveyor of posts that hardly have any value.. in other words, frequently junk and even portraying yourself as unreliable.
-
Well, I've already proposed to you to keep my share in advance, and it would save time and money, but you insist on dificul.tar..., for my part, I have my word, since you don't want to keep my part in advance, so let's get my word, and who knows if you would even use the trust system to give me positive feedback? maybe, maybe if it was a higher value... but it doesn't need to... Now if you insist on giving me feedback, whether negative or neutral, that's okay too, it's up to you.
-
Although you find me annoying, I'm not killing you with my song, am I? Even though sometimes you can be very 'irritating' too, I don't troll you or trying to kill you with my song...
-
Well, in any case, you don't want to accept to be with my side ahead, and even though you proposed that we go to the word, to the beard hair, and suddenly you went back, I don't know, maybe...
...I can send you a PM, if of course you allow it, suggesting a person from here on this topic, that i believe be a good person, who I believe is trustworthy, and I believe he can accept to stay with our part and deliver it to the winner on March 1st, can it be if you don't want to go on the word?...
-
Strumming my pain with her fingers
Singing my life with her words
Killing me softly with her song
Killing me softly with her song
Telling my whole life with her words
Killing me softly with her song
I felt all flushed with fever, embarrassed by the crowd
I felt she found my letters and read each one out loud
I prayed that she would finish
But she just kept right on
Strumming my pain with her fingers
Singing my life with her words
Killing me softly with her song
Killing me softly with her song
Telling my whole life with her words
Killing me softly with her song
(Written by: Norman Gimbel, Charles Fox
Album: And I Love You So
Released: 1973)
********∞********
-Well, for you, who wasted your time reading so far, could you spend a little more of your time to answer a poll about the future of bitcoin?...I found this topic interesting because the subject is current, but the date is not that current,...
Please give it some thought before voting and discussing, so as to avoid simply stating your political and philosophical biases instead of providing a realistic, sober analysis.
Many people on this forum presume that bitcoin will eventually come under serious attack. Most often it's stated that "a government" is expected to attack bitcoin for some reason, or for no reason at all. Other culprits might include certain corporations, or unintended consequences of actions of users or groups of users (for example, the doomsday scenarios discussed in relation to ASIC mining).
On the other hand, perhaps you think that some or all of the above entities might actually find reasons to embrace bitcoin rather than destroy it.
.
....
Doomsday was the day I lost some bitcoins on Hashnest, because it was from Bitmain, I never saw them again... I liked to trade with hash power... it was more profitable than leaving dammm mining, the day came that they said that they, the s13 if I don't remember, and they would send it to me... hahaha, how would I declare a bunch of old and used S13?.... Among many losses, this was one of them... I accumulated a lot of BTC in the negative hehehe... >>>
" On an island in the sun
We'll be playing and having fun
And it makes me feel so fine
I can't control my brain"
43. Post 66129132 (unedited backup) (by icopress) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 23:57:13 CET 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
The challenge for icopress has just been announced. I guess the marketing part is his concern, and he has to change the fact that members like LoyceV don't know much about bitlist.co
Loyce is well acquainted with BitList, but he must have forgotten.
I think he even turned down my request to wear a BitList signature a few months ago, so he's definitely visited the site.
44. Post 66128689 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 22:08:19 CET 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
Ninjastic.space is now BitList Archive
I saw that you announced significant changes on bitlist.co, but I did not expect this at all.
Is this your first time hearing about BitList?
I honestly don't know anymore, I think I always considered "BitList" and "BitMixList" to be the same thing. Don't tell me nobody else was confused by those names
Just clearing things up...
NotATether created
BitMixListI created (coded)
BitList with icopress
The challenge for icopress has just been announced. I guess the marketing part is his concern, and he has to change the fact that members like LoyceV don't know much about bitlist.co
45. Post 66128158 (unedited backup) (by Halab) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 19:35:43 CET 2025) in [Registration] Best Altcoins Portfolio 2025:
The youngest children start counting down the nights until Christmas.
Some have to start counting down the days until the end of this contest (I confess, I'm one of them).
Here is the latest update :
| Pos | Users | 02/12/2025 |
| 1 | paid2 | 1 290,33 |
| 2 | internetional | 1 242,10 |
| 3 | Halab | 1 157,30 |
| 4 | LoyceV | 1 146,39 |
| 5 | GazetaBitcoin | 1 053,78 |
| 6 | sompitonov | 939,67 |
| | Bitcoin | 913,04 |
| 7 | memehunter | 805,23 |
| 8 | DireWolfM14 | 804,01 |
| 9 | ajiz138 | 798,81 |
| 10 | examplens | 738,15 |
| 11 | icopress | 649,60 |
| 12 | rat03gopoh | 610,27 |
| 13 | n0nce | 567,21 |
| 14 | GrosWesh | 521,60 |
| 15 | shahzadafzal | 518,72 |
| | Average | 518,46 |
| 16 | FinneysTrueVision | 514,26 |
| 17 | Smartprofit | 510,69 |
| 18 | B1g4udge | 508,62 |
| 19 | DYING_S0UL | 495,70 |
| 20 | Rikafip | 425,85 |
| 21 | tokeweed | 384,99 |
| 22 | Despairo | 379,55 |
| 23 | Saint-loup | 378,34 |
| 24 | LogitechMouse | 367,11 |
| 25 | SamReomo | 361,92 |
| 26 | jokers10 | 360,50 |
| 27 | Taskford | 336,99 |
| 28 | xandry | 321,84 |
| | Random_but_balanced | 311,97 |
| 29 | Woodie | 300,05 |
| 30 | cryptofrka | 292,34 |
| 31 | bitmover | 255,75 |
| 32 | famososMuertos | 255,15 |
| 33 | klarki | 231,89 |
| 34 | Buchi-88 | 231,80 |
| 35 | worldofcoins | 217,23 |
| 36 | libert19 | 210,70 |
| 37 | arallmuus | 182,53 |
| 38 | Koal-84 | 154,61 |
| 39 | xLays | 120,15 |
| 40 | slackovic | 96,67 |
Line chart race :
https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/23486883/LCR without Woodie :
https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/24269401/Next upodates : 17/12 and 23/12.
46. Post 66128144 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 19:31:37 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
Suggestion: can you add a progress indicator? Say: "23% Completed"? I can imagine it becomes harder to keep track when someone creates many offers and they're all partially completed. Even better if the user can sort by the Completed percentage column.
Very good suggestion!It's similar to the order-fill percentage indicator on CEX platforms.
We will definitely add this feature, but a bit later, as we are still working through the remaining minor bugs.
Status: [Added to backlog]
When I create an Offer, I receive confirmation emails that address me as "Dear Seller,". This is correct.
When someone accepts my Offer, I receive several emails with subjects "Deal Release Initiated" and "Deal Completed Successfully". Both emails address me as "Dear Buyer,", which I assume is a bug.
This is a bug related to the email logic.
We will fix it soon.
Status: [Added to backlog]
Inside the email:
- Input: 100000 BITCOIN_SATOSHI
- Output: 229872241326 MONERO_PICONERO
- Status: Completed
Suggestion: switch to more useful units: it's much easier to see the value when you write 0.229872241326 XMR. For Bitcoin, both 0.001 BTC or 100000 sat aren't ideal. Maybe this should depend on the amount being sent: if it's large, use BTC, if it's small, use sats. But considering all of Bridgoro uses the full units, it's probably best to do the same in the confirmation email: use BTC and XMR.
Many people are already confused by "milli", I don't think they'll get "pico". Google tells me piconero is cheese.I understand your frustration, we left it in this form for testing purposes only.
But soon, as we get closer to the end of the Beta, we will switch it to normal human-readable data.
Status: [Not a bug]
I'd like to have more informative email headers: if I rely on emails to keep track of the status of my trades, I'd prefer to see which Offer is involved without opening the email, especially since Bridgoro quickly sends many emails. Maybe add the trading pair to the title, or give each one of My Offers a number (a short number, so start at 1) so I can quickly identify which Offer it's about.
We will add the
Offer ID to the notification emails along with the rest of the data.
Status: [Added to backlog]
Error
Maximum amount per offer reached for user level
Can you increase my User Level so I can create a test transaction to sell 200 XMR for BTC? I'm
user4117083827.
Suggestion: show the maximum amount on the Create Offer page. Now I can only see it when I fill in my addresses and click "Create".
Please accept the task on the Earnings page titled
[ Task for LV4 (Bitcointalk) ]and submit the code I sent you via PM.
Once your submission is approved, you will receive enough XP to upgrade to a Level 4 account.
And your suggestion noted.
Status: [Added to backlog]
1. What happens if a buyer sends too much? Let's test: I sent 1 XMR for a 0.034990116953 XMR Offer.
Result: I paid a huge dumb fee and received the coins I bought as expected.
I kinda like the idea of making the user responsible for their own stupidity
But once the site becomes very active, I wouldn't be surprised if Support gets overloaded with refund requests. Yep, I have high confidence in human stupidity.
That's exactly why we named that fee the
Dumb Fee.
2. What happens if a user sends too much while creating an Offer? Let's test: I created an offer to trade 1 XMR, and deposited 10 XMR.
Result: Now this gets interesting: My Offer for 10 XMR is created! Even though Bridgoro told me my user level is too low, I can just deposit more and create it anyway. I expected a 9 XMR "Dump Fee" in this case!
Follow-up test: Cancel this offer: I get 10 XMR (minus fee) returned.
This isn't a bug, but it seems we missed this part, and now a Level 0 account can create an Exchange Offer using any amount, essentially an exploit.
We will fix this or come up with a new idea to prevent such amount increases.
Status: [Added to backlog]
After clicking Cancel, I found a typo (2x), and I assume this should be "initiated":
Cancel Rollback Inited
It means the cancel rollback has been inited.
is the past tense and past participle of the verb
"init" which is used in computing to mean
"initialized".
3. Can a Level 0 user create a Level 4 Offer? Let's test: I ticked "LEVEL 4" and sent 50 XMR to create a "1" XMR Offer. Just whale things.
Result: I, a LEVEL 0 n00b, can create a 50 XMR Offer that's only available for LEVEL 4 users:
I assume this is an unintended "feature", after all, the system tells me I can't even create a 5 XMR Offer.
We already responded above, and we will fix this part.
Status: [Already added to backlog]
Now I'm curious to test the opposite of #2:
4. What happens if a user Creates and Offer for 1 XMR, but deposits only 0.9 XMR?
Result: "Partially confirmed underpayment". Followed by an automated refund (minus transaction fee).
Question: is this the intended behaviour? Why not still create the offer? I'm asking, because most instant exchanges allow for a slight variation in deposit and adjust the trade accordingly, so many users will be used to not paying attention to exact values.
Yes, this intended behaviour and the same must be when you send exceeding amount when you create offer.
Status: [Not a bug]
I think the emails about this can be improved:
We have detected an underpayment for your offer. The partially confirmed deposit amount is less than the required amount.
~
Please contact support or make an additional deposit to complete your offer.
Followed by:
Your deposit for offer has been confirmed, but the amount received is less than required.
~
Please make an additional deposit or contact our support team for assistance.
Missing:
<an email telling me I received a refund>
It would make sense if the first (unconfirmed) email tells me to make an addition deposit, but the second email arrives around the time of the refund, so by then it would be more useful to tell me to wait for my refund, and create a new Offer.
This is going to suck when Bitcoin transaction fees are high. I suggest to remove the "or contact our support team" from emails related to underpayments.
There should probably be a limit to how many deposits a user can make to fund one Offer: if an abuser would make for instance 1000 dust transactions to fund an Offer, the buyer will see the majority of his buy spent on transaction fees.
Its a bug and we will fix it soon.
Status: [Already added to backlog]
Today, I only had to log in once and could do all my testing without being kicked out again.
Session Expiration bug is still exists and we are working on fixing it and temporary turned of in some scenarios.
We will notify all users when session expiration will work correctly.
Status: [In progress]
47. Post 66127896 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 18:25:07 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:
I just wanted to ask if your service has any safeguards in place that will assure that users don't receive "tainted" coins.
By receiving such coins your users could face issues with CEX-es down the line if they decide to send funds there later on.
Sorry, buddy, my fault. I skimmed your message and replied too quickly, so I misunderstood it.
At this stage, we can't guarantee whether a user might send "tainted" or "stolen" coins. However, after the release, we are considering implementing a coin-checking mechanism on buffer wallets. In cases where "dirty" coins are detected, the Exchange Offer would simply roll back those funds.
We will include this important information in the T&C and also display it in a popup screen when the user opens Bridgoro.
Ovcijisir is referring to
the notion of taint, which is not only an attack on Bitcoin's fungibility, it's also fundamentally flawed as
taint is in the eye of the beholder.
Yeah, I got it!
Thanks for pointing it out. I just didn't read that message carefully
I guess that's a lot of work to make a log every single day, but you are right this can help us from duplication or we can do it easily, as my way is to write down all the bugs and reports mentioned there and here in a doc file, and whenever I find a bug, I search for similar terms if they are mentioned and relevant then we should avoid investingating it more.
Or if you think doc file is not what you want to do, you can just copy everything and give it to chatgpt haha and then after finding a bug you can ask chatgpt if anyone has already reported it. Work smart.
We are glad that you are taking the time to double-check your previously reported bugs. This effort really helps us.
I red the post you included and I agree that flagging some coins as tainted could lead to users view BTC as less fungible. Seizing coins because they were stolen 5 years ago and exchanged 20 owners in meantime should not be option, and sadly I also believe some exchanges see it as a way to get some more funds. Also what happens to coins that were used in crimes and seized by government and later used as BTC reserve? They were "dirty" to the moment they got in hands of government, and from that moment on they are "clean"?
That being said, using "tainted" coins can still carry the risk of losing them (for example I may exchange BTC for USDC) and most users would like to avoid that uncomfortable situation.
Totally agree with you.
We had a discussion about this exact situation with LoyceV during the first Beta.
Of course, we will do our best to improve Bridgoro and add new features, including additional security measures. But since our team consists of only two developers with a very limited budget, we can't cover everything or implement all ideas and suggestions before the release.
48. Post 66127647 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 17:16:37 CET 2025) in [ANN] Bridgoro Exchange - Participate in Beta Test and Earn up to 300 USDT:
I just wanted to ask if your service has any safeguards in place that will assure that users don't receive "tainted" coins.
By receiving such coins your users could face issues with CEX-es down the line if they decide to send funds there later on.
Buffer wallets accept only the native coins of the specific blockchains selected for the exchange. Moreover, all transactions must be confirmed by the blockchain, so there is absolutely no chance that a user will receive anything other than real crypto.
Ovcijisir is referring to
the notion of taint, which is not only an attack on Bitcoin's fungibility, it's also fundamentally flawed as
taint is in the eye of the beholder.
I red the post you included and I agree that flagging some coins as tainted could lead to users view BTC as less fungible. Seizing coins because they were stolen 5 years ago and exchanged 20 owners in meantime should not be option, and sadly I also believe some exchanges see it as a way to get some more funds. Also what happens to coins that were used in crimes and seized by government and later used as BTC reserve? They were "dirty" to the moment they got in hands of government, and from that moment on they are "clean"?
That being said, using "tainted" coins can still carry the risk of losing them (for example I may exchange BTC for USDC) and most users would like to avoid that uncomfortable situation.
49. Post 66127185 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 14:50:31 CET 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
Is this your first time hearing about BitList?
I honestly don't know anymore, I think I always considered "BitList" and "BitMixList" to be the same thing. Don't tell me nobody else was confused by those names
Just clearing things up...
NotATether created
BitMixListI created (coded)
BitList with icopress
50. Post 66127135 (unedited backup) (by AakZaki) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 14:35:07 CET 2025) in Top Daily Merit Senders (Live Updates):
If you keep up daily updates with daily notifications for anyone that uses a notification bot, I expect many people (including myself) to quickly add this topic to their notification-ignore-list.
Honestly I made this not without reason, before this became a thread here. I personally used it as my detector tool, to find out the distribution of Merit in my Broard Local, because I saw that there was a merit distribution that was massively abused.
That's why I was able to find a connected account like the one I wrote here
=>
A Comprehensive Analysis Identifying NINE Connected Accounts =>
From SIX accounts it has now increased to THIRTEEN connected accounts.=>
4 Hero Members and 1 Sr. Member are connected and 2 of them are in EpicbetAll of this was possible thanks to my tool, because I process the merit data and notice anomalies in the merit distribution itself.
On the other hand, there are several Merit Sources who seem to oppose this thread for some reason. My initial assumption is that maybe they are worried about being discovered if their merit was distributed to the wrong posts.
That's just an assumption, because I don't really care if they distribute it to anyone.
As I mentioned in the OP, I was inspired by you. If you’re willing, I’m open to any feedback or suggestions from you.
It’s actually easy for me to change anything in this thread. the format, the update schedule, the title, or even having it locked if necessary.
This is my first tool for the forum, and I’m trying to contribute as much as possible so that I won’t be told that I don’t contribute anything here, as Don Pedro Dinero once said to others.
(...) and writing a looong post that has something to do with what is being discussed but doesn't really contribute anything. I suppose it works as advertising for the casinos they are promoting, but they don't contribute anything to the forum.
Other Suggestions and Inputs I welcome with pleasure.
51. Post 66127125 (unedited backup) (by TryNinja) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 14:31:43 CET 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
Ninjastic.space is now BitList Archive
I'm confused
I had to look it up, as this name reminded me of
BitMixList, but it's not.
or the bitlist.co website by icopress.
So does this mean Ninjastic joined forces with icopress?
Is this your first time hearing about BitList?
I've coded it more than 1 year ago.
This is great!
But you should make everything automatically redirect so that no links break.
It would be quite the PITA for all the extensions and scripts to change their links to the new URL.
All links will remain functional so nothing breaks. And they will redirect automatically later on.
In practice, I made sure
every ninjastic.space link will keep working since it would be bad if an archive link suddenly dies. Report if anything is wrong and I'll fix it.
No, no, I already have the total count of posts on the boards and child boards. What I was interested in was this
https://api.ninjastic.space/posts?board=28&child_boards=true&after_date=2025-11-01T00:00:00&before_date=2025-11-30T23:59:59&limit=1000
On this endpoint, I find all the posts written on the Italian board, including the child boards, but unfortunately, I only find 200 posts in the JSON, when in reality there are more than 600.
My question was whether there was a specific endpoint to obtain all the data I need. In this case, I used the thread title and counted how many times this title appeared and compiled a table of the top 10 threads that had received the most replies during the month, regardless of who wrote the post.
Hey, for now since it's sorted by post_id (from highest to lowest), you can paginate by using the
last parameter.
Results:
post 1100
post 1099
post 1098
...
post 1000 (last item)
Then you query again adding ?last=1000
And it will return from there:
post 999
post 998
...
If there are no more posts returned or the API returns < 200 posts (limit), it means there are no new pages.
52. Post 66126880 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 13:19:19 CET 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
I guess this means we are finally out of Ninjastic beta to main release, but I am a bit sad to see Ninjastic name going extinct
It will take some time to get used to new design and new name, but it's finally time to move forward.
So does this mean Ninjastic joined forces with icopress?
I think they are already working together for while now
53. Post 66126803 (unedited backup) (by TokenTikas) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 12:48:37 CET 2025) in Top Daily Merit Senders (Live Updates):
Moreover, daily publishing will one day be impossible, as, unfortunately, everyone faces various problems (I certainly don't wish them on the OP) that prevent us from regularly visiting the forum. Furthermore, the OP could suggest opening a different topic for comments and closing this one, to avoid turning it into a mega-topic, which is bound to happen one day. Daily analysis in a closed topic, and viewing it without other comments, is much more convenient than scrolling and searching for the right day.
I would constructively suggest to the OP that he changes the updates to weekly, to be consistent with other threads that are updated in the section. I suppose that if he leaves it as it is, it will be allowed, but making daily updates will soon end up in a megathread, as you say, which he may not be able to update at some point, and I personally don't see the point, but maybe I'm missing something, given the merits of the OP. There are a lot of stat lovers around here.
If we calculate a demo, it will become a megathread in less than a month.
Example: Post per day (1*30=30Post), Weekly post (1*4=4Post), Monthly post (1*1=1Post).
If every thread of the forum becomes 15 pages plus and 20 pages plus, then it is called a megathread. However, no matter how AakZaki does it, it will become a megathread in all aspects, Day/Weekly/Monthly. If it updates daily, it will become a megathread in a short time. If it is weekly, it will become a megathread a little later. However, if it is not posted every day, but posted weekly according to your feedback, it will be nice. It will become a little difficult to create and post reports every day.
If you keep up daily updates with daily notifications for anyone that uses a notification bot, I expect many people (including myself) to quickly add this topic to their notification-ignore-list.
It is normal to keep the notification on the ignore list because in this way, the update of the same type of report every day will actually be annoying. Although everyone appreciates it at first, it will be added to the ignore list in a short time.
54. Post 66126647 (unedited backup) (by katanic97) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 11:48:56 CET 2025) in Top Daily Merit Senders (Live Updates):
If you keep up daily updates with daily notifications for anyone that uses a notification bot, I expect many people (including myself) to quickly add this topic to their notification-ignore-list.
I agree, i support the analysis regarding the daily sending of merits, but maybe a weekly update with analyses would be better. For example, like the weekly overview for signature campaigns
55. Post 66125565 (unedited backup) (by AakZaki) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 01:45:25 CET 2025) in Top Daily Merit Senders (Live Updates):
Top Daily Merit Senders (2 December 2025)"+------+------------------------------+--------------+
| No | User | Total Merit |
+------+------------------------------+--------------+
| 1 | vapourminer | 69 |
| 2 | klarki | 61 |
| 3 | JayJuanGee | 30 |
| 4 | El duderino_ | 24 |
| 5 | d5000 | 22 |
| 6 | Pmalek | 21 |
| 7 | hugeblack | 19 |
| 8 | pooya87 | 17 |
| 9 | Julien_Olynpic | 16 |
| 10 | LFC_Bitcoin | 15 |
| 11 | lovesmayfamilis | 13 |
| 12 | ABCbits | 9 |
| 12 | AakZaki | 9 |
| 12 | Africolo | 9 |
| 12 | Xal0lex | 9 |
| 12 | fillippone | 9 |
| 17 | Big Dirams | 8 |
| 17 | Porfirii | 8 |
| 17 | The Sceptical Chymist | 8 |
| 17 | nutildah | 8 |
| 21 | Tungbulu | 7 |
| 22 | Donk1 | 6 |
| 22 | LoyceV | 6 |
| 22 | Welsh | 6 |
| 22 | babo | 6 |
| 22 | rdbase | 6 |
| 22 | xandry | 6 |
| 28 | Bridgoro | 5 |
| 28 | Don Pedro Dinero | 5 |
| 28 | d_eddie | 5 |
| 28 | dkbit98 | 5 |
| 28 | hedgeh0g | 5 |
| 28 | igebotz | 5 |
| 28 | joker_josue | 5 |
| 28 | philipma1957 | 5 |
| 28 | xzone | 5 |
| 37 | BattleDog | 4 |
| 37 | CLS63 | 4 |
| 37 | Emeraldo | 4 |
| 37 | Outhue | 4 |
| 37 | Plutosky | 4 |
| 37 | TheUltraElite | 4 |
| 37 | Wake Up | 4 |
| 37 | buwaytress | 4 |
| 37 | internetional | 4 |
| 46 | Abdulzuruku01 | 3 |
| 46 | Agbam | 3 |
| 46 | Ayebabara | 3 |
| 46 | Biodom | 3 |
| 46 | Buchi-88 | 3 |
| 46 | EFS | 3 |
| 46 | Fiasem20 | 3 |
| 46 | GazetaBitcoin | 3 |
| 46 | Hueristic | 3 |
| 46 | Hvdv | 3 |
| 46 | SuperBitMan | 3 |
| 46 | TypoTonic | 3 |
| 46 | blomen | 3 |
| 46 | gbianchi | 3 |
| 46 | giorgione | 3 |
| 46 | jeremypwr | 3 |
| 46 | yhiaali3 | 3 |
| 63 | $crypto$ | 2 |
| 63 | *Ace* | 2 |
| 63 | Balmain | 2 |
| 63 | BobLawblaw | 2 |
| 63 | EluguHcman | 2 |
| 63 | Free Market Capitalist | 2 |
| 63 | Hypnotizer | 2 |
| 63 | ITExpert | 2 |
| 63 | JimboToronto | 2 |
| 63 | MaxMueller | 2 |
| 63 | Nwada001 | 2 |
| 63 | OcTradism | 2 |
| 63 | OgNasty | 2 |
| 63 | Polkeins | 2 |
| 63 | RealNoblee | 2 |
| 63 | TryNinja | 2 |
| 63 | anonymousminer | 2 |
| 63 | apogio | 2 |
| 63 | asUHWEceyc | 2 |
| 63 | examplens | 2 |
| 63 | execijutiere | 2 |
| 63 | goodpunt | 2 |
| 63 | irfan_pak10 | 2 |
| 63 | mole0815 | 2 |
| 87 | AHOYBRAUSE | 1 |
| 87 | Ab de villiers | 1 |
| 87 | Agbe | 1 |
| 87 | AlcoHoDL | 1 |
| 87 | Alex077 | 1 |
| 87 | Ambatman | 1 |
| 87 | Awaklara | 1 |
| 87 | Bitcoin Smith | 1 |
| 87 | Bluedrem | 1 |
| 87 | Charles-Tim | 1 |
| 87 | CryptSafe | 1 |
| 87 | Daniel91 | 1 |
| 87 | Emitdama | 1 |
| 87 | Findingnemo | 1 |
| 87 | Finebone | 1 |
| 87 | Grace333 | 1 |
| 87 | Hottiek | 1 |
| 87 | Inwestour | 1 |
| 87 | JSRAW | 1 |
| 87 | Jaweria parveen | 1 |
| 87 | JeromeTash | 1 |
| 87 | Lillominato89 | 1 |
| 87 | Mitchell | 1 |
| 87 | Mrbluntzy | 1 |
| 87 | Numeral | 1 |
| 87 | OrangeFren | 1 |
| 87 | OutOfMemory | 1 |
| 87 | Phoenix Anka | 1 |
| 87 | RewFrew | 1 |
| 87 | Rikafip | 1 |
| 87 | SFR10 | 1 |
| 87 | SUPERSAIAN | 1 |
| 87 | Smartprofit | 1 |
| 87 | Su-asa | 1 |
| 87 | Synchronice | 1 |
| 87 | Task | 1 |
| 87 | Tetu100 | 1 |
| 87 | Tonimez | 1 |
| 87 | Trofo | 1 |
| 87 | Unknown Op | 1 |
| 87 | Yaunfitda | 1 |
| 87 | Zaka1221 | 1 |
| 87 | acroman08 | 1 |
| 87 | aipercoin | 1 |
| 87 | ajanwalker | 1 |
| 87 | albon | 1 |
| 87 | alegotardo | 1 |
| 87 | avp2306 | 1 |
| 87 | banana33 | 1 |
| 87 | bbc.reporter | 1 |
| 87 | bitmover | 1 |
| 87 | crwth | 1 |
| 87 | darxiaomi | 1 |
| 87 | eightdots | 1 |
| 87 | katanic97 | 1 |
| 87 | kriminall | 1 |
| 87 | m2017 | 1 |
| 87 | mak013 | 1 |
| 87 | mp3.Maniac | 1 |
| 87 | nathmaroal | 1 |
| 87 | ovcijisir | 1 |
| 87 | paco92x | 1 |
| 87 | serveria.com | 1 |
| 87 | stwenhao | 1 |
| 87 | taufik123 | 1 |
| 87 | tbct_mt2 | 1 |
| 87 | trendcoin | 1 |
| 87 | ultrloa | 1 |
| 87 | wachtwoord | 1 |
| 87 | xhomerx10 | 1 |
| 87 | yenerbatmaz | 1 |
| 87 | yixichloro2xx | 1 |
| 87 | yslyv | 1 |
+------+------------------------------+--------------+"
Summary:Total Users: 159
Total Merit Sent: 680
Average Merit per User: 4.27
Minimum – Maximum Merit: 1 – 69
Top 10 Merit Share: 43.23%
(Top 10 users sent 294 out of 680 total merit)
Top 10 Merit Senders:
56. Post 66125483 (unedited backup) (by KarmaHODL) (scraped on Wed Dec 3 00:43:25 CET 2025) in [ANN] Satoshi Chat - An AI Simulation based on 2009-2010 Historical Data:
Why doesn't it just say "I am Japanese" if it is supposed to emulate him? Satoshi is/was a real person and the AI should answer as if it were a real person, if the goal is to pretend to be him.
Satoshi created 575 posts, of which about 55 topics were related to posting updates on the Bitcoin network. This means that the posts available for analyzing Satoshi's style are less than 500 posts, which is a small number to build a conversation model similar to Satoshi's writing style.
If the bot worked properly, it would answer "I don't know" or "体何の話をしているの？"
a lot. OP - it is a great idea, and if you want to PM me I can give you some additional ideas to promote it, but you should get involved with @LoyceV or @TryNinja, allow a user to select a profile here and then query based on their posts. (ex: Please list times this user has contradicted themselves" or "List threads where this user acts as a collateral agent".) In the legal field thousands are paid to clerks and experts to manually parse andf flag details like this and while the larger firms hgave their own AI tools by now, you could usher in a new service for scammed people to prove their case without involving lawyers.
Thank you very much for the great idea! I’ve sent you a PM with a link to the PoC project “Legal Lens Forensics.”
Regarding Satoshi – you know, the bot works as best as it can. Simply impersonating people using AI isn’t entirely legal, which is why the model we’re using has certain limitations we can’t bypass. The current database of 539 posts allows it to analyze what Satoshi wrote, and our instructions guide its responses – but of course, it will never be the real Satoshi.
Thank you so much for your help in providing this data! It’s incredibly useful and interesting!
I’ll add both sources for the model to analyze in order to enrich its personality – I’ll try to do this by the weekend when I can take a break from my paid work.
I’ll also add all available emails and posts from the P2P Foundation – they’re nicely collected on this page:
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.orgOnce again, thank you all for your ideas and for showing respect for my work. I haven’t been this happy programming in a long time, and I’ve been doing it for almost two decades.
I’ll get back to you with a bot update in a few days! In the meantime, best regards, and I encourage you to continue playing with the bot and sharing your feedback. Thank you!
57. Post 66125244 (unedited backup) (by KingsDen) (scraped on Tue Dec 2 23:25:19 CET 2025) in Does this count as a death threat?:
I know this feedback was left a while back by
OlegChernenkov who is not on DT on
JohnGalt's profile, but I found it unpleasant, though it had no reference link
| | OlegChernenkov | | 2025-07-02 | | | | Calling poor people losers. I hope you get robbed, raped and killed for your beastly behavior...bastard. |
Could this be considered a death threat that can be reported to the mods for action?
Generally, these are not pleasant words to be used at anyone.
If it were to be offline, I will consider it a threat, but here in the forum, I would call it evil wishes and it will not bother me a bit, especially if it's coming from a random unestablished member.
I had always seen LoyceV remember Tman in situations like this. I want to know if Tman does similar things like things in different ways.
Although, the person that left the feedback is an unhappy and bittered soul, which was not the case with Tman
58. Post 66123886 (unedited backup) (by *Ace*) (scraped on Tue Dec 2 17:29:07 CET 2025) in [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana:
Intento theymos ha pubblicato la nuova DT1.
Aspettiamo l'aggiornamento di babo (una volta lo facevo io) per sapere cosa è successo questo mese.
Intanto rinnovo l'invito a tutti a completare la vostra trust list personale.
Dicembre 2025Lista New Users:
OgNasty (CONFIRMED)
Vod (CONFIRMED)
vapourminer (CONFIRMED)
mprep (CONFIRMED)
Foxpup (CONFIRMED)
philipma1957 (CONFIRMED)
Cyrus (CONFIRMED)
Welsh (CONFIRMED)
d5000 (CONFIRMED)
joker_josue (CONFIRMED)
Pmalek (CONFIRMED)
vizique
albon (CONFIRMED)
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr (CONFIRMED)
EFS
stompix (CONFIRMED)
hilariousandco (CONFIRMED)
arulbero
buckrogers (CONFIRMED)
Buchi-88 (CONFIRMED)
JayJuanGee (CONFIRMED)
NeuroticFish (CONFIRMED)
achow101 (CONFIRMED)
DaveF (CONFIRMED)
examplens (CONFIRMED)
nutildah (CONFIRMED)
minerjones
irfan_pak10 (CONFIRMED)
bitbollo (CONFIRMED)
pooya87 (CONFIRMED)
LFC_Bitcoin (CONFIRMED)
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke (CONFIRMED)
klarki (CONFIRMED)
LoyceV (CONFIRMED)
SFR10 (CONFIRMED)
holydarkness (CONFIRMED)
polymerbit (CONFIRMED)
tweetious (CONFIRMED)
giammangiato (CONFIRMED)
buwaytress (CONFIRMED)
crwth (CONFIRMED)
Ale88 (CONFIRMED)
Kryptowerk (CONFIRMED)
Vispilio (CONFIRMED)
hosemary (CONFIRMED)
krogothmanhattan (CONFIRMED)
JollyGood (CONFIRMED)
RaltcoinsB (CONFIRMED)
igebotz (CONFIRMED)
roycilik (CONFIRMED)
CryptopreneurBrainboss (CONFIRMED)
hugeblack (CONFIRMED)
El duderino_ (CONFIRMED)
KTChampions (CONFIRMED)
Trofo (CONFIRMED)
icopress (CONFIRMED)
JeromeTash (CONFIRMED)
logfiles (CONFIRMED)
Bitcoin_Arena (CONFIRMED)
MinoRaiola (CONFIRMED)
GazetaBitcoin (CONFIRMED)
TheBeardedBaby (CONFIRMED)
mole0815 (CONFIRMED)
bitmover (CONFIRMED)
DdmrDdmr (CONFIRMED)
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
Husna QA (CONFIRMED)
fillippone (CONFIRMED)
cryptofrka (CONFIRMED)
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator (CONFIRMED)
lovesmayfamilis (CONFIRMED)
DireWolfM14 (CONFIRMED)
notblox1 (CONFIRMED)
Little Mouse (CONFIRMED)
YOSHIE (CONFIRMED)
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara (CONFIRMED)
efialtis (CONFIRMED)
geophphreigh (CONFIRMED)
zasad@ (CONFIRMED)
Rikafip (CONFIRMED)
Etranger (CONFIRMED)
NotATether (CONFIRMED)
Stalker22 (CONFIRMED)
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner (CONFIRMED)
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89 (CONFIRMED)
Free Market Capitalist (CONFIRMED)
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove (CONFIRMED)
God Of Thunder (CONFIRMED)
| . . . . | Lista Utenti Italiani:
|
Link Utili:Bella babo, sempre sul pezzo ed efficente!
Io ho già tirato giù i dati del mese passato e anche le tabelle, scritto il post, manca soltanto che fillippone produca il suo report!
Ho anche aggiunto una nuova statistica per la board italiana.
Inoltre vorrei chiedere se qualcuno dei nostri utenti abbia idea di una nuova statistica che possa completare il report, tenendo conto che posso utilizzare solo dati per post e Merit.
Forza ragazzi! Via con le idee
59. Post 66123069 (unedited backup) (by Bridgoro) (scraped on Tue Dec 2 14:04:25 CET 2025) in [BOUNTY] Beta Test & Earn: $1,300 Reward Pool for Top Testers!:
#7 Status Info MismatchI try to cancel my created offer, and in the cancelation detail it say "CANCEL_ROLLBACK_PARTIALLY_CONFIRMED"
while the transaction still unconfirmed yet
To make sure I'm not make a mistake, so i checked the docs and it say
Partial Confirmation - Initial confirmation level (e.g., 1 for BTC).
So, the info message for partial confirmation becomes the default message even if there's no transaction confirmation on the chain? If it becomes the default, I think the message is inconsistent with the documentation.
We will double-check this part.
I believe now that the system switches to
PARTIALLY_CONFIRMED as soon as it detects your transaction on the blockchain, and the
Release Ready status appears after a certain number of confirmations.
But we will verify this issue regardless.
Maybe you can look into why I get 1 hour even though I ticked "Remember me". Since it used to work when it was 365 days, it should be 48 hours now and not just 1. One hour isn't even enough for 6 confirmations, which means a user has to login again even before his transaction is completed.
Yeah, some users are seeing the
Session Expiration work properly, while others are not.
One of our own testing accounts isn't behaving correctly either, so we will continue working on fixing this issue.
How about reducing it for low amounts? Anything under 1% of the block reward shouldn't really be at risk, and I think that's a conservatively low amount (but enough to make many transactions faster).
The thing is, when we start creating and implementing different scenarios and rules for certain amount thresholds, more bugs begin to appear. Of course, we will continue working on constant upgrades and improvements for the project, but these changes will be implemented only after the release. Otherwise, adding such logic now would require launching another Beta test all over again.
I'll send you 100 Stagenet XMR when I have 10 confirmations in Feather
Done!
Thanks a lot. We received
100 XMR.
I've never before sent such large XMR amounts before, nor used the GUI wallet, nor had that many inputs. When I sent my entire GUI balance at once to Feather, I received 2 transactions: 115 + 53 XMR. That means somehow it was split up into 2 transactions without me asking for it, and I guess that's because of the large number of inputs. If I would have sent that transaction to Bridgoro, and it would have received 2 instead of 1 incoming transaction, would system be able to handle that properly? Since this is an automatic "feature" of Monero's GUI wallet, I think it's kinda important that this is handled correctly. I'll test this after mining another 150+ coins
We never encountered anything like this during our tests and planning, but now we need to verify it. Thanks for reporting it.
We will test an Exchange Offer by sending two separate transactions and will update you with the results.
60. Post 66122086 (unedited backup) (by babo) (scraped on Tue Dec 2 08:28:01 CET 2025) in [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana:
Intento theymos ha pubblicato la nuova DT1.
Aspettiamo l'aggiornamento di babo (una volta lo facevo io) per sapere cosa è successo questo mese.
Intanto rinnovo l'invito a tutti a completare la vostra trust list personale.
Dicembre 2025Lista New Users:
OgNasty (CONFIRMED)
Vod (CONFIRMED)
vapourminer (CONFIRMED)
mprep (CONFIRMED)
Foxpup (CONFIRMED)
philipma1957 (CONFIRMED)
Cyrus (CONFIRMED)
Welsh (CONFIRMED)
d5000 (CONFIRMED)
joker_josue (CONFIRMED)
Pmalek (CONFIRMED)
vizique
albon (CONFIRMED)
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr (CONFIRMED)
EFS
stompix (CONFIRMED)
hilariousandco (CONFIRMED)
arulbero
buckrogers (CONFIRMED)
Buchi-88 (CONFIRMED)
JayJuanGee (CONFIRMED)
NeuroticFish (CONFIRMED)
achow101 (CONFIRMED)
DaveF (CONFIRMED)
examplens (CONFIRMED)
nutildah (CONFIRMED)
minerjones
irfan_pak10 (CONFIRMED)
bitbollo (CONFIRMED)
pooya87 (CONFIRMED)
LFC_Bitcoin (CONFIRMED)
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke (CONFIRMED)
klarki (CONFIRMED)
LoyceV (CONFIRMED)
SFR10 (CONFIRMED)
holydarkness (CONFIRMED)
polymerbit (CONFIRMED)
tweetious (CONFIRMED)
giammangiato (CONFIRMED)
buwaytress (CONFIRMED)
crwth (CONFIRMED)
Ale88 (CONFIRMED)
Kryptowerk (CONFIRMED)
Vispilio (CONFIRMED)
hosemary (CONFIRMED)
krogothmanhattan (CONFIRMED)
JollyGood (CONFIRMED)
RaltcoinsB (CONFIRMED)
igebotz (CONFIRMED)
roycilik (CONFIRMED)
CryptopreneurBrainboss (CONFIRMED)
hugeblack (CONFIRMED)
El duderino_ (CONFIRMED)
KTChampions (CONFIRMED)
Trofo (CONFIRMED)
icopress (CONFIRMED)
JeromeTash (CONFIRMED)
logfiles (CONFIRMED)
Bitcoin_Arena (CONFIRMED)
MinoRaiola (CONFIRMED)
GazetaBitcoin (CONFIRMED)
TheBeardedBaby (CONFIRMED)
mole0815 (CONFIRMED)
bitmover (CONFIRMED)
DdmrDdmr (CONFIRMED)
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
Husna QA (CONFIRMED)
fillippone (CONFIRMED)
cryptofrka (CONFIRMED)
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator (CONFIRMED)
lovesmayfamilis (CONFIRMED)
DireWolfM14 (CONFIRMED)
notblox1 (CONFIRMED)
Little Mouse (CONFIRMED)
YOSHIE (CONFIRMED)
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara (CONFIRMED)
efialtis (CONFIRMED)
geophphreigh (CONFIRMED)
zasad@ (CONFIRMED)
Rikafip (CONFIRMED)
Etranger (CONFIRMED)
NotATether (CONFIRMED)
Stalker22 (CONFIRMED)
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner (CONFIRMED)
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89 (CONFIRMED)
Free Market Capitalist (CONFIRMED)
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove (CONFIRMED)
God Of Thunder (CONFIRMED)
| . . . . | Lista Utenti Italiani:
|
Link Utili:
61. Post 66121511 (unedited backup) (by Vod) (scraped on Tue Dec 2 03:07:25 CET 2025) in [ANN] Satoshi Chat - An AI Simulation based on 2009-2010 Historical Data:
I asked "what race are you?"
Satoshi said "I am an artificial intelligence model..."
That was a
terrible job at simulating what Satoshi would write.
I have removed the mandatory "I am an AI" disclosure for personal questions. If you ask about his race, age, or location now, he will respond evasively or dismissively, prioritizing privacy just as a cypherpunk from 2010 would.
Why doesn't it just say "I am Japanese" if it is supposed to emulate him? Satoshi is/was a real person and the AI should answer as if it were a real person, if the goal is to pretend to be him.
Satoshi created 575 posts, of which about 55 topics were related to posting updates on the Bitcoin network. This means that the posts available for analyzing Satoshi's style are less than 500 posts, which is a small number to build a conversation model similar to Satoshi's writing style.
If the bot worked properly, it would answer "I don't know" or "体何の話をしているの？"
a lot. OP - it is a great idea, and if you want to PM me I can give you some additional ideas to promote it, but you should get involved with @LoyceV or @TryNinja, allow a user to select a profile here and then query based on their posts. (ex: Please list times this user has contradicted themselves" or "List threads where this user acts as a collateral agent".) In the legal field thousands are paid to clerks and experts to manually parse andf flag details like this and while the larger firms hgave their own AI tools by now, you could usher in a new service for scammed people to prove their case without involving lawyers.
62. Post 66121500 (unedited backup) (by AakZaki) (scraped on Tue Dec 2 02:55:19 CET 2025) in Top Daily Merit Senders (Live Updates):
Top Daily Merit Senders (1 December 2025)"+------+------------------------------+--------------+
| No | User | Total Merit |
+------+------------------------------+--------------+
| 1 | LFC_Bitcoin | 92 |
| 2 | fillippone | 42 |
| 3 | The Sceptical Chymist | 32 |
| 4 | El duderino_ | 31 |
| 5 | vapourminer | 27 |
| 6 | EFS | 26 |
| 7 | hugeblack | 15 |
| 7 | pooya87 | 15 |
| 9 | Julien_Olynpic | 14 |
| 10 | LoyceV | 12 |
| 10 | Slot Kid | 12 |
| 12 | BobLawblaw | 10 |
| 12 | Don Pedro Dinero | 10 |
| 12 | Xal0lex | 10 |
| 12 | dkbit98 | 10 |
| 16 | Black Mbaye | 8 |
| 16 | BlackHatCoiner | 8 |
| 16 | Emeraldo | 8 |
| 16 | internetional | 8 |
| 16 | klarki | 8 |
| 16 | nutildah | 8 |
| 16 | somac. | 8 |
| 23 | ABCbits | 7 |
| 23 | Hueristic | 7 |
| 23 | JayJuanGee | 7 |
| 26 | AlcoHoDL | 6 |
| 26 | Alex077 | 6 |
| 26 | Joy_learns_crypto | 6 |
| 26 | joker_josue | 6 |
| 26 | logfiles | 6 |
| 26 | xLays | 6 |
| 26 | xandry | 6 |
| 33 | BillyCoiner | 5 |
| 33 | GazetaBitcoin | 5 |
| 33 | Italian Panic | 5 |
| 33 | Itz-prisigold | 5 |
| 33 | Merit.s | 5 |
| 33 | Publictalk792 | 5 |
| 33 | Rgram | 5 |
| 33 | arulbero | 5 |
| 33 | mole0815 | 5 |
| 42 | AHOYBRAUSE | 4 |
| 42 | Bitcoin.com97 | 4 |
| 42 | Chilwell | 4 |
| 42 | Crypt0Gore | 4 |
| 42 | Forsyth Jones | 4 |
| 42 | Mhizlove | 4 |
| 42 | Ronsbit | 4 |
| 42 | mv1986 | 4 |
| 42 | stwenhao | 4 |
| 51 | Agbam | 3 |
| 51 | BitBakerr1 | 3 |
| 51 | CLS63 | 3 |
| 51 | Charles-Tim | 3 |
| 51 | Cricktor | 3 |
| 51 | Crytohillss | 3 |
| 51 | Dr.Bitcoin_Strange | 3 |
| 51 | Dunamisx | 3 |
| 51 | Lillominato89 | 3 |
| 51 | Lucius | 3 |
| 51 | TryNinja | 3 |
| 51 | babo | 3 |
| 51 | bitmover | 3 |
| 51 | cAPSLOCK | 3 |
| 51 | famososMuertos | 3 |
| 51 | irfan_pak10 | 3 |
| 51 | jeremypwr | 3 |
| 51 | lovesmayfamilis | 3 |
| 51 | mrust_mobile | 3 |
| 51 | ovcijisir | 3 |
| 71 | 348Judah | 2 |
| 71 | AakZaki | 2 |
| 71 | Adbitco | 2 |
| 71 | Daniel91 | 2 |
| 71 | Doan9269 | 2 |
| 71 | Dreadboost | 2 |
| 71 | Ever-young | 2 |
| 71 | Little Mouse | 2 |
| 71 | Localhostspeed | 2 |
| 71 | Loyang | 2 |
| 71 | MaxMueller | 2 |
| 71 | NotATether | 2 |
| 71 | Pjcr7 | 2 |
| 71 | SFR10 | 2 |
| 71 | SuperBitMan | 2 |
| 71 | The Cryptovator | 2 |
| 71 | TypoTonic | 2 |
| 71 | VB1001 | 2 |
| 71 | albon | 2 |
| 71 | anonymousminer | 2 |
| 71 | buwaytress | 2 |
| 71 | julerz12 | 2 |
| 71 | ozgr | 2 |
| 71 | philipma1957 | 2 |
| 71 | psycodad | 2 |
| 71 | zasad@ | 2 |
| 97 | Agbe | 1 |
| 97 | Akbarkoe | 1 |
| 97 | Alvin_talk | 1 |
| 97 | Biodom | 1 |
| 97 | Bluedrem | 1 |
| 97 | Cointikka | 1 |
| 97 | Danydee | 1 |
| 97 | Distinctin | 1 |
| 97 | EarnOnVictor | 1 |
| 97 | EmVi | 1 |
| 97 | EpicCharles | 1 |
| 97 | Floczy | 1 |
| 97 | Grace333 | 1 |
| 97 | Harkorede | 1 |
| 97 | Hatchy | 1 |
| 97 | Husna QA | 1 |
| 97 | Inwestour | 1 |
| 97 | Jaweria parveen | 1 |
| 97 | JimboToronto | 1 |
| 97 | Kryptowerk | 1 |
| 97 | Lakai01 | 1 |
| 97 | Mitchell | 1 |
| 97 | Moreno233 | 1 |
| 97 | Mr_Brilliant$ | 1 |
| 97 | NeuroticFish | 1 |
| 97 | Ochan_yazo_tochant | 1 |
| 97 | OgNasty | 1 |
| 97 | OutOfMemory | 1 |
| 97 | PX-Z | 1 |
| 97 | Peanutswar | 1 |
| 97 | PowerGlove | 1 |
| 97 | SmartGold01 | 1 |
| 97 | Steeley | 1 |
| 97 | Task | 1 |
| 97 | Vod | 1 |
| 97 | Wiwo | 1 |
| 97 | Zoomic | 1 |
| 97 | _act_ | 1 |
| 97 | arthurbonora | 1 |
| 97 | bastisisca | 1 |
| 97 | bisdak40 | 1 |
| 97 | bubilas | 1 |
| 97 | chronicsky | 1 |
| 97 | coolcoinz | 1 |
| 97 | d_eddie | 1 |
| 97 | eightdots | 1 |
| 97 | epomis | 1 |
| 97 | examplens | 1 |
| 97 | giorgione | 1 |
| 97 | goldkingcoiner | 1 |
| 97 | icopress | 1 |
| 97 | kennycryptoitalia | 1 |
| 97 | retaur | 1 |
| 97 | robelneo | 1 |
| 97 | salad daging | 1 |
| 97 | satscraper | 1 |
| 97 | taufik123 | 1 |
| 97 | tread93 | 1 |
| 97 | vanesha | 1 |
| 97 | xhomerx10 | 1 |
| 97 | xzone | 1 |
| 97 | yslyv | 1 |
+------+------------------------------+--------------+"
Summary:Total Users: 158
Total Merit Sent: 732
Average Merit per User: 4.63
Minimum – Maximum Merit: 1 – 92
Top 10 Merit Share: 43.44%
(Top 10 users sent 318 out of 732 total merit)
Top 10 Merit Senders:
63. Post 66120891 (unedited backup) (by theymos) (scraped on Mon Dec 1 22:41:38 CET 2025) in DT update log:
This month 112 users were eligible.
Old:
theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
Mitchell
albon
jeremypwr
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TryNinja
Jet Cash
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
imhoneer
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
TheBeardedBaby
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
morvillz7z
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
BlackHatCoiner
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
New:
OgNasty
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
d5000
joker_josue
Pmalek
vizique
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
bitbollo
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
mocacinno
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
holydarkness
polymerbit
tweetious
giammangiato
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
hosemary
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
TheBeardedBaby
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
notblox1
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
inspace
jokers10
Awaklara
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Etranger
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Free Market Capitalist
YodasRedRocket
PowerGlove
God Of Thunder
