Last update: 2025-11-12_Wed_22.06h (Amsterdam time)
Change your preferences in LoyceV's notification bot.
See Notifications for others.
LoyceV receives Notifications when he's quoted or mentioned
Ignore list:
Posts from these users are ignored:
1. Timelord2067
2. LoyceV
3. wolwoo
4. Bitcoin SV
5. The-One-Above-All
6. Excimer
7. truth or dare
8. bonesjonesreturns
9. KaneVWE
10. Laudanum
11. Quantum_Resolve7987V
Posts in these topics are ignored:
1. [ТОП-200] Щедрые пользователи, дающие мериты
2. [TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks!
3. [TOП-200] Пoльзoвaтeли, пoддepживaющиe нoвичкoв - Cпacибo!
4. Time Series Analysis on Distributed Merits in the forum (daily, weekly, monthly)
5. [CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs
6. Interquartile range of intra-day merits with time series plot
7. Timelord2067's Timely Test and Main-neT LighTning Loans to a "T"
8. Weekly earned merits (median) of top 100 merited users
9. The active levels of sent/earned merits of users , excludes autobanned/ nuked
10. Bitcointalk Merit Dashboard
Username "LoyceV" occurred in the following posts (quoted and/or mentioned):
1. Post 66040689 (unedited backup) (by promise444c5) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 22:05:13 CET 2025) in Stay alert even your ledger wallet can be compromised!:
I noticed most didn’t go through the link I posted earlier in the thread, so I’ll clear up how OP got scammed and save you guys the stress of having to click it.
OP (the victim) got an email from Ledger impersonators, could be as a result of random spam, data breach, insider… but that’s still a misery to OP.
In short, OP clicked the bait and got phished, the rest was a story…
IjawMan Peanutswar .
From the comments a user asked if OP entered his seed anywhere online and he replied “Yes”
…
[FTFY]
I'll never understand how people spend money to buy a hardware wallet, but don't spend some time to understand what they're doing before doing it.
Trend… Hardware wallets are trending.Once i have it, i don’t need to worry about losing my funds
2. Post 66039025 (unedited backup) (by Shishir99) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 14:33:38 CET 2025) in User beveryu778 spamming on the Landing section.:
To be clear once again, I did that intentionally to prove a point. When Justinlamode made his post, it was waved off as inconsequential because a reputable member was involved. I intentionally wrote in similar pattern as the topic being discussed in the thread which is someone forgetting to login with his other account to see how fast the judgement will be passed since a non reputable member is now involved. You did not waste time to prove me right,You did not even noticed that I edited the post many times with different opinions which I expected you to bring using Ninjastic and LoyceV too so that the forum will take note that judgement have become opinion and suspicion and not based on fact. We are not the same person if that will satisfy your taste for blood.
Do you think people are foolish enough to believe you?
You just made a mistake and edited it several times. Once you notice that you are fucked up, you just come up with an idea and pretend like you did it intentionally. No, you did not do it intentionally. People are not that stupid to do something intentionally stupid. If I ever plan to do something crazy, I would write a message with a PGP encryption, and they would do it, so I can prove it later. However, the reality is that you made a mistake already and are pretending like you did it intentionally. Unfortunately, I am not a member of the DT. I would leave negative feedback for being a liar.
3. Post 66038582 (unedited backup) (by Free Market Capitalist) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 12:11:26 CET 2025) in Merit tarrif:
That's rich (pun intended!), coming from someone who belongs to the top 0.01% of Merit earners!
As a good part-time Regulated Market Socialist I only consider rich those who are wealthier than me.
4. Post 66038167 (unedited backup) (by PaperWallet) (scraped on Wed Nov 12 09:28:55 CET 2025) in Fortunejack changing island and owner:
@nutildah thank you for keeping the promise
Congratulations PaperWallet. Your victory is almost complete, just FortuneJack paying you what you are owed as per the Court ruling is what remains.
Your conduct throughout the years of your struggles when you were cheated by FortuneJack has been exemplary. Your endeavours have brought you success you deserved. If FortuneJack switch licences again or refuse to pay what you are owed, you will always have won the moral victory even if you are left out of pocket.
Having said that, I hope they pay they you as soon as possible because they have put you through enough already and for that reason they should pay you and then both parties should move on.
Congratulations again. These are the main parts that stood out for me:
2.10. Conclusion
"■■■■■ claims are granted. Nexus and Antillephone are jointly and severally liable to pay EUR87,750.50, plus statutory interest from the filing date until full payment.
Extrajudicial collection costs
2.11. Since it has been shown that attempts were made to collect the debt amicably, the requested reimbursement of collection costs is granted—calculated according to the Court’s standard of 1.5 points of the applicable fee scale—resulting in ANG 3,000, jointly payable by Nexus and Antillephone
Legal costs
2.12.
"Nexus and Antillephone are ordered, as the largely unsuccessful parties, to pay ■■■■■’s legal costs, totaling: - Service costs: ANG 783.28 - Court fee: ANG 2,100.00 - Attorney’s fee: ANG7,000.00 (3.5 points x tariff 7) Total: ANG 9,883.283.
Decision
The Court:
3.1. Orders Nexus and Antillephone jointly and severally, such that payment by one releases theother, to pay ■■■■■ EUR 87,750.50, plus statutory interest from the filing date until full payment.
3.2. Orders Nexus and Antillephone jointly and severally to pay ■■■■■ ANG 3,000 in extrajudicial collection costs.
3.3. Orders Nexus and Antillephone to pay ■■■■■’s legal costs, amounting to ANG 9,883.28."This is a monumental victory for you. I wonder how FortuneJack will proceed after the judgement. It was inevitable they were always going to dispute how the Court came to conclusions on specific points but the Court stood firm and dismissed their arguments.
The judgement includes service costs, Court fees, your legal fees and your initial win. That total is around $109,000 (€94,000).
Regardless of whether FortuneJack appeal and prolong the inevitable, congratulations on your win Paper Wallet.
Thank you! Thank you as well for making the summary. Can you support my flag and pin LoyceV about this?
I have 2 legendary members supporting it but still not enough for it to be active (and no one opposing it)
@shield132 @GxSTxV @notblox1 @zwei @wapfika @´Rating Place’ you’ve commented here can you please support the flag
5. Post 66037089 (unedited backup) (by DrBeer) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 23:03:13 CET 2025) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
If we are talking about truly random number generation, then in the range from 0 to 10,000, over a long period of time we should get a virtually uniform distribution of “random” numbers. In summary, if these were truly “random” numbers, then we would get, for example, by making 50,000 rolls (as in the example given here), an approximately uniform distribution.
You are completely right.
I am sure they are using the same algorithm to generate the random number, but something makes 10,000 be generated less frequently than expected.
As I already said, LoyceV's experience may explain the reason.
From what I've read, and experienced myself a few times (many years ago): their "fraucet" freerolls sometimes got "stuck", and after reloading the server seed was replaced. I can only assume that's the moment you should have won.
The other thing that comes to my mind is that the server seed may not be generated randomly.
I am sure a very big percentage of users roll without changing the client seed and this allows freebitco to generate any number they want by adjusting the server seed.
But in the algorithm, we have a rounding mechanism that “cuts off” the extreme values, which means that 9994-10000 are not actually “spun.” That is, if we assume that everything works according to the algorithm, then the algorithm itself greatly reduces the probability of obtaining the most winning range. If I have time, I will try to show the mathematical model of the distribution of this algorithm.
It's only the number 10,000 that has a lower probability of being generated. The probability of hitting 10,000 is 1 in 20,000.
In fact, there is enormous scope for mathematical manipulation here. Mathematics, the “queen of sciences,” can perform many clever tricks with numbers.
I will express my personal opinion once again: if the generation were based on a real random number algorithm, the platform would hardly take the risk, knowing that in this case they would get a sufficiently “uniform distribution,” which is what distinguishes true random algorithms from “controlled” ones. As I wrote earlier, I will try to analyze this algorithm to understand what its “features” are. These features are not very noticeable and are “cleverly disguised,” aiming to minimize the probability of “extreme” values in the range.
And most importantly, all this is provided that there is no manipulation of “starting values” on the server side, which we cannot verify.
6. Post 66037083 (unedited backup) (by FinneysTrueVision) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 23:01:49 CET 2025) in User beveryu778 spamming on the Landing section.:
You just confirmed the point that judgement here have become biased. I just did exactly what beveryu778 did in that lending thread but it was waved off because of the person involved. Assuming a small user do that, immediately conclusion would have been reached that they are the same person.
To be clear once again, I did that intentionally to prove a point. When Justinlamode made his post, it was waved off as inconsequential because a reputable member was involved. I intentionally wrote in similar pattern as the topic being discussed in the thread which is someone forgetting to login with his other account to see how fast the judgement will be passed since a non reputable member is now involved. You did not waste time to prove me right,You did not even noticed that I edited the post many times with different opinions which I expected you to bring using Ninjastic and LoyceV too so that the forum will take note that judgement have become opinion and suspicion and not based on fact. We are not the same person if that will satisfy your taste for blood.
This has nothing to do with rank. beveryu778 is impersonating other users, interfering in threads where money is being exchanged. If this does not raise red flags for you, there is something seriously wrong.
By trying to copy their behavior to prove a point, you’ve just made yourself look suspicious and dragged another user into it. justinlamode was waved off because their comment was clearly wrong. They could have been fishing for merit or it might have been a genuine mistake. You didn’t need to get so defensive about it and make everyone believe you are their alt.
7. Post 66036917 (unedited backup) (by dkbit98) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 22:15:43 CET 2025) in Unstoppable wallet {User experiences}:
Unstoppable wallet doesn't support hardware wallets, and my only other experience is with Electrum for Bitcoin. How do I rid of Eth from a Ledger hardware wallet?
This is correct, Unstoppable wallet is not supporting hardware wallets, but latest version of Cake wallet does support Trezor HW, and other hardware wallets including ledger crap.
I think Cake wallet have support for ethereum and few other altcoins, so you c<n try using that, but their mobile app is better than desktop wallet.
I don't know why unstoppable is unable to solve this issue.
I don't have issues with syncing monero on unstopable wallet, but one of the issues could be if Tor is enabled or some node settings.
8. Post 66036367 (unedited backup) (by Moreno233) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 19:39:56 CET 2025) in User beveryu778 spamming on the Landing section.:
Z_MBFM You are a scammer. I will provide proof of your scamming. I know of many scammers on this forum. I will expose them all soon. Fuck you and also fuck JollyGood. He gave me an unfair Red Tag. I didn't do anything wrong here, but I was given a Red Tag.
Fuck you Linda at the front desk too (What?)
Guy in the mailroom, fuck you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd6YLdtf37E 
Lost control?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Vw9x1vuZC8
Well, the Nigerian gang rejoice with their fellow Bengali alt farm gang.
I can smell the disaster
You just confirmed the point that judgement here have become biased. I just did exactly what beveryu778 did in that lending thread but it was waved off because of the person involved. Assuming a small user do that, immediately conclusion would have been reached that they are the same person.
To be clear once again, I did that intentionally to prove a point. When Justinlamode made his post, it was waved off as inconsequential because a reputable member was involved. I intentionally wrote in similar pattern as the topic being discussed in the thread which is someone forgetting to login with his other account to see how fast the judgement will be passed since a non reputable member is now involved.
You did not waste time to prove me right,You did not even noticed that I edited the post many times with different opinions which I expected you to bring using Ninjastic and LoyceV too so that the forum will take note that judgement have become opinion and suspicion and not based on fact. We are not the same person if that will satisfy your taste for blood.
9. Post 66036190 (unedited backup) (by PaperWallet) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 18:48:49 CET 2025) in Fortunejack changing island and owner:
Lots of reputable accounts read the evidence and still not supported the flag (and that is, only talking about those who commented here). Maybe they’re waiting for the final order to pay by the court and see if they’ll pay or not. Nonetheless, these are still unpaid winnings from 3 years ago and deserve a flag…
OK, I'm inclined to agree with you at this point. One of your bets was incorrectly voided and you should have been paid for it. Plus them leaving Curacao for some country nobody has ever heard of is a big red flag. Once the final court order has been made, post it here (please don't alter the text except for blacking out your personal information) and I will support your flag. You will need a net 3 DT members to support the flag for it to be visible on their threads.
@nutildah you can find the final judgement in my initial post at the end, can you please now support my flag?:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3385@JollyGood would you also do the same? Would you also kindly pin LoyceV about this. In the past he checked my subject, didn’t oppose the flag, but neither supported it, and said it would be interesting to see what a judge says. Well, there you have it. I wouldn’t do it because he expressed to be annoyed by me at some point so I’ll respect his privacy.
10. Post 66036086 (unedited backup) (by The Cryptovator) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 18:16:08 CET 2025) in Two alternative accounts, one of which forgot to re-login.:
ObariThe story is trivial. Two alt accounts, one of which was cited in a plagiarism thread, began actively seeking
the truth and defending themselves. Everything can be verified in the thread. One claims they didn't copy, after which the second appears, forgetting to change their usernames, and writes the same apology under the first name. They then edit the post, using some obscure phrases, but LoyceV's archive remembers everything.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6601/66013623.htmlAs a result, two accounts violate the company's signature rules by participating with their alt accounts.
I don't know why these guys abuse the system with alt accounts when they could use their alts legally just by participating in different campaigns. And bad evasion is against forum rules that should raise concern on the Meta, so the moderator would take a deep look and take decisions. I have tagged both accounts because I feel they are abusing the signature campaign besides evading the ban.
So far I've noticed alt accounts have been exposed even after years. But still we aren't learning; also, we should follow the forum rules as well. If you do something wrong, it means you have to pay for that. I really don't want to destroy a higher-rank account since I know how hard it is to build an account. But in some cases, an abuser should take a hard lesson.
11. Post 66035580 (unedited backup) (by vapourminer) (scraped on Tue Nov 11 16:10:01 CET 2025) in How long did it take you to really “get” how Bitcointalk works?:
I'm still learning new things after 10+ years.
same
and i grew up on dial up BBS
12. Post 66032726 (unedited backup) (by ovcijisir) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 21:13:07 CET 2025) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
If we are talking about truly random number generation, then in the range from 0 to 10,000, over a long period of time we should get a virtually uniform distribution of “random” numbers. In summary, if these were truly “random” numbers, then we would get, for example, by making 50,000 rolls (as in the example given here), an approximately uniform distribution.
You are completely right.
I am sure they are using the same algorithm to generate the random number, but something makes 10,000 be generated less frequently than expected.
As I already said, LoyceV's experience may explain the reason.
From what I've read, and experienced myself a few times (many years ago): their "fraucet" freerolls sometimes got "stuck", and after reloading the server seed was replaced. I can only assume that's the moment you should have won.
The other thing that comes to my mind is that the server seed may not be generated randomly.
I am sure a very big percentage of users roll without changing the client seed and this allows freebitco to generate any number they want by adjusting the server seed.
~
I think that not only free spins are rigged but also that their dice is manipulated too. I had strange experience where I tried to wager my funds using Martingdale system and got almost impossible losing spee where I lost most of my funds there.
Unfortunately I don't know how to check if server seed of dice roll is correct, so I contributed it to bad luck.
13. Post 66032225 (unedited backup) (by Synchronice) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 18:41:43 CET 2025) in How long did it take you to really “get” how Bitcointalk works?:
Been around here for a bit now and I kinda get how things work, but still trying to get more familiar with all the different boards and where everything actually fits.
At the start I didn’t really understand the whole merit and ranking thing, or how some boards are way more active than others. Slowly getting there though, just takes some time I guess.
How long did it take you guys to actually feel like you fully understood how the forum works?
It's a very simply forum with simple setting and simple rules. There is not really much to learn, everything feels natural, at least this was the case for me. At first ranking up needed to be figured out a little bit but with small Google search I gained access to thread that explains what is ranking and how it works. To be honest, I misunderstood how trust was working and I added many people into trust without really acknowledging how important trust system is on this forum but later I understood my mistake and corrected it.
At the start I didn’t really understand the whole merit and ranking thing, or how some boards are way more active than others.
Oh really? You're
a chatbot spammer. Do you do that on other forums on the internet too, or only here because you're hoping to rank up to monetize your spam?
I'm still learning new things after 10+ years.
That was very funny
14. Post 66032189 (unedited backup) (by hosemary) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 18:34:19 CET 2025) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
If we are talking about truly random number generation, then in the range from 0 to 10,000, over a long period of time we should get a virtually uniform distribution of “random” numbers. In summary, if these were truly “random” numbers, then we would get, for example, by making 50,000 rolls (as in the example given here), an approximately uniform distribution.
You are completely right.
I still believe they are using the same algorithm to generate the random number, but something makes 10,000 be generated less frequently than expected.
As I already said, LoyceV's experience may explain the reason.
From what I've read, and experienced myself a few times (many years ago): their "fraucet" freerolls sometimes got "stuck", and after reloading the server seed was replaced. I can only assume that's the moment you should have won.
The other thing that comes to my mind is that the server seed may not be generated randomly.
I am sure a very biy percentage of users roll without changing the client seed and this allows freebitco to generate any number they want by adjusting the server seed.
But in the algorithm, we have a rounding mechanism that “cuts off” the extreme values, which means that 9994-10000 are not actually “spun.” That is, if we assume that everything works according to the algorithm, then the algorithm itself greatly reduces the probability of obtaining the most winning range. If I have time, I will try to show the mathematical model of the distribution of this algorithm.
It's only the number 10,000 that has a lower probability of being generated. The probability of hitting 10,000 is 1 in 20,000.
15. Post 66031619 (unedited backup) (by Ultegra134) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 16:35:25 CET 2025) in How long did it take you to really “get” how Bitcointalk works?:
Oh really? You're
a chatbot spammer. Do you do that on other forums on the internet too, or only here because you're hoping to rank up to monetize your spam?
I'm still learning new things after 10+ years.
I bet he grasped the idea of how ChatGPT works quite fast! This is one of the cases that deserve to be nuked, although the latest 3-4 posts look like absolute crap to be written by AI, he still has posts on 4th or 5th of November that are pure AI diarrhea, with this post being an attempt to indirectly gain merit.
Anyway, the forum is quite easy to navigate, activity and ranking up is quite straightforward if you spend 10 minutes to read how it works (but I'm guessing OP didn't, he might have asked ChatGPT though). Only the trust system is a little more complicated and it's something I recently learned how it works and navigates.
16. Post 66029952 (unedited backup) (by hopenotlate) (scraped on Mon Nov 10 09:22:19 CET 2025) in Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings:
Sorry to clutter your thread, but I'm curious. It's not a big deal, just a simple question: your report shows that I have earned 272 merits, while my profile, as well as my profile on bpip, shows 273.
I'm wondering what's causing this discrepancy: perhaps I received a merit in a thread that was later deleted? Or was the one I received on November 6th not counted because the "snapshot" that generated your report was taken earlier? Or maybe there's another reason.
17. Post 66026353 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sun Nov 9 12:04:49 CET 2025) in Unstoppable wallet {User experiences}:
I think I'll have to cave in, upgrade the firmware, and consider the device bricked afterwards. That's unfortunate, as I would have wanted to keep using it with it's current firmware and Electrum. I just don't trust new Ledger's new firmware.
Try metamask. It is a browser extension maybe it will recognize your device.
If it doesn't, you just uninstall it.
I don't think it needs ledger live..
18. Post 66025032 (unedited backup) (by Ultegra134) (scraped on Sun Nov 9 00:34:13 CET 2025) in What you have to do if you want to use AI as a translator and not get tagged:
Although I understand the OP's point, to provide a way for non-English speakers to write well-constructed posts. However, I do tend to agree with LoyceV and Satofan44 in this one. ChatGPT and AI platforms in general won't only translate your text but also polish it. I highly doubt that if you write a post in whatever language and it's not properly written, the AI translation will be. You're still pretending to be someone you're not.
You're not able to communicate with others in English; thus, you're going to use AI to do it? Either stick to your local board or do what you can with whatever English knowledge you have; I'll only accept if you use a service to correct a few mistakes, not to change the text entirely.
19. Post 66024806 (unedited backup) (by logfiles) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 23:28:38 CET 2025) in DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned):
<...>
This list has significantly shrunk over time?
What are we looking at here? A couple of members decided to become sane to removed their negative feedbacks or a couple of them just got removed from DT membership?
I don't even remember if there was a time when it (the list) was this small
20. Post 66024740 (unedited backup) (by FinneysTrueVision) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 23:09:56 CET 2025) in How to check if website has a crypto drainer:
I've never used "Metamask" and I never will, but why would you "connect your wallet" to a website if that gives the site access to drain your wallet? Just don't "connect" it, and even better: don't use wallets that offer this "functionality"!
What happened to the general precaution: don't use web wallets!
You need to connect to an interface to be able to interact with smart contracts. Using web apps is the most convenient and straightforward way to do that. Browser extensions are fine for holding a small amount of funds. For anything above $1k in value, then a hardware wallet is recommended. At that point, as long as your seed backup is offline and in a secure place, the safety of your funds comes down to not signing anything malicious.
21. Post 66024303 (unedited backup) (by JayJuanGee) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 21:17:38 CET 2025) in Unstoppable wallet {User experiences}:
You probably own an old ledger model.
Yep, it's the Nano S.
As your screen is very small and the device is old, you need to enable blind sign. New Ledger models wont need to enable blind sign, they will show all transaction details. You just use blind because your device is old.
Even Bitcoin addresses don't fit the screen, but I can scroll through them to verify. I don't see why an Ethereum transaction wouldn't be able to show the address. I don't need smart contracts, just a regular transaction. From your link:
Enabling blind signing is an advanced feature that is only required for signing transactions involving smart contracts (e.g. swapping tokens via a decentralized exchange).
The fact that Myetherwallet asks for access it's not supposed to need makes me doubt it even more.
Also, as your device is old, you can safely update your firmware as it doesn't support that seed online feature.
I'm still hoping the hardware isn't compromised and (physically) doesn't allow seed phrase extraction, but I can't be sure about this.
Actually, using an updated firmware is safer .
I'm not so sure about that.
This sounds like a terrible, TERRIBLE idea:
When you enable blind signing, you enable your signer to approve a smart contract transaction, even though it hasn’t been able to display full contract data to you. In other words, you’re agreeing to trust, instead of verify, the transaction.
If this sounds like more of a risk, that’s because it is. Blind signing by definition lacks vital transparency – but with the dApp and DeFi ecosystem expanding so rapidly, it’s a process that sometimes cannot be avoided.
In these cases, you are the gatekeeper for your crypto: that means doing some due diligence to ensure things check out before you sign.
So you'll basically have to TRUST that the website or app you're using isn't going to take all your funds. That's like giving your bank account details to a stranger, hoping he won't take drain your account.
I found another option:
Myetherwallet offline signing. It's going to be a lot of work to extract my private keys and figure out how to do this, which is
very annoying as one of the main reasons to buy a hardware wallet is to be able to conveniently sign transactions in a safe environment. Face palm!
If you are interacting with questionable devices, then are you working to transfer to some device that is more comfortable? Of course, shitcoins will tend to have more ways that you end up having to rely upon closed source and therefore questionable third party involvement, so then if there is some other way to either move the value and/or to use that seed in some other device and then move the value upon getting access to the coins.. for these one time transactions into some place that you have more confidence.
For sure, some of us feel that we are even less technically astute and then trying to figure out which sources we might be able to trust based on the discussions of others - and maybe sometimes we end up relying on wrong information.. so then yeah, how much value to keep in various shitcoins whether it is potentially to use them for some purpose, if the purpose is not trading them? I do admit to holding a few shitcoins, but I largely don't do anything with them, yet I still sometimes have difficulties figuring out where and how to store them and potentially compromising myself in the process, but if it might ONLY be less than 1% of my total portfolio value (referring to bitcoin) then maybe it is not as BIG of a deal - not that any of us want to lose money - especially if we suspect that there might be some malicious actors involved in potentially separating us from our coins (even if they have relatively small value).
Anyhow.. it looks like you guys have got this worked out.. to the extent that you are dabbling with shitcoins and wasting your time, energy and money in those endeavors, even though sure, I might concede that arguably there could be some value in playing around with some of that and personally experiencing (witnessing) some of the happenings with various other ways that shitcoins and shitcoin services interact (work to scam people out of their value - with a potential end goal of taking your bitcoin.. or converting their shitcoin and shitcoin related products into king daddy bitcoin ...hahahahaha)
22. Post 66024241 (unedited backup) (by Vod) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 20:54:49 CET 2025) in DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned):
I'm glad to see this list is much shorter now.
Just a month ago there were 35 users with negative feedback on DT.
Enjoy it for the next week or so until you-know-who gets back into DT1.
, we finally have a stable DT system.
23. Post 66023808 (unedited backup) (by Solosanz) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 18:51:49 CET 2025) in How to check if website has a crypto drainer:
I've never used "Metamask" and I never will, but why would you "connect your wallet" to a website if that gives the site access to drain your wallet? Just don't "connect" it, and even better: don't use wallets that offer this "functionality"!
Because it doesn't cost money and offer convenience, most people like those two thing. I don't think people will consider to completely stop using a wallet that have function to connect to other website, just like how people hold their coins in CEX and think nothing bad will happen to them.
I just checked metamask[dot]io out of curiosity (on Tor), but this entire site reminds me of the typical ICO scam from around 2017: animations, no information, just "get it". It doesn't even tell me what it is, just flashy and "add it". How can millions of users add this addon to their browser?
People aren't interested to read if they can just click it, the ending is same, if they read + click they would spend more effort and time.
24. Post 66023113 (unedited backup) (by hosemary) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 15:52:19 CET 2025) in Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API:
You have shared a wrong link. It shows trust inclusions and exclusions.
You probably meant to share
this link.
That doesn't explain why Merit sent to deleted posts doesn't show up, but I'm not familiar enough with the Merit Dashboard to reproduce it either.
Just a guess:
DdmrDdmr's merit dashboard records which board the merited post has been made in.
If a post has been deleted, his tool can't acess it to see which board it was located on and then it ignores it completely.
25. Post 66023014 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 15:29:26 CET 2025) in Unstoppable wallet {User experiences}:
Maybe you will need to update your firmware for metamask to recognize your device...
It reminds me how easy Bitcoin is
[/quote
You wont be able to use electrum with ledger nano with a very old firmware too....
Unless you use a very old electrum as well.
You can try with an old metamask. It may work
26. Post 66022839 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 14:30:19 CET 2025) in Unstoppable wallet {User experiences}:
I found another option:
Myetherwallet offline signing. It's going to be a lot of work to extract my private keys and figure out how to do this, which is
very annoying as one of the main reasons to buy a hardware wallet is to be able to conveniently sign transactions in a safe environment. Face palm!
You only have ETH, right? No need to use any smartcontrqct for that.
No need for blind sign.
You can just install metamask (if ledger live is not working) and try to send the ETH from metamask. Metamask works very well with ledger nano (I use it a lot for eth and tokens).
Maybe you will need to update your firmware for metamask to recognize your device...
But certainly there is not need for blind signing to send eth.
27. Post 66022578 (unedited backup) (by bitmover) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 13:19:37 CET 2025) in Unstoppable wallet {User experiences}:
Anyway, good hardware wallets such as Ledger Nano and Trezor support Zcash.
I wouldn't call a Ledger "good": they
upload seed phrases. But that brings me to my problem: I still have a Ledger (from before they proudly announced they broadcast seed phrases), on which I received an Ethereum donation. I want to use it to pay for hosting, but Ledger Live tells me to update my firmware, which I don't want to do because of the link above. I tried myetherwallet[dot]com, but it tells me to enable "Blind Signing". A quick search tells me that means I don't have to confirm anything on the hardware wallet's screen, and the web wallet can just do whatever it wants. I honestly don't understand why anyone would want that, or why a hardware wallet would even implement it. It's the one reason to use a hardware wallet: confirm everything on it's own screen.
At the risk of going off-topic, but not daring to join the spam on the altcoin board, I'll post it here: any idea how to securely sign this transaction? Unstoppable wallet doesn't support hardware wallets, and my only other experience is with Electrum for Bitcoin. How do I rid of Eth from a Ledger hardware wallet?
You probably own an old ledger model.
As your screen is very small and the device is old, you need to enable blind sign. New Ledger models wont need to enable blind sign, they will show all transaction details. You just use blind because your device is old.
Also, as your device is old, you can safely update your firmware as it doesn't support that seed online feature. Actually, using an updated firmware is safer .
Also, support says that updating firmware may even allow you to complete transactions without blind sign
https://support.ledger.com/article/4405481324433-zd
28. Post 66022428 (unedited backup) (by LOCKACO) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 12:31:31 CET 2025) in Remove Proxyban (evil fees) - get whitelisted for free:
Can you please unban user
Mr. K. Black?
He's my brother, I wanted to help him create an account and he got banned
Lol, an AI spammer with a "brother". Nice try. No.
i didn't initially know it wasn't legit to use Ai, but since I got to know I've not used it again, i just started knowing more about the platform of recent
29. Post 66022154 (unedited backup) (by ABCbits) (scraped on Sat Nov 8 10:53:38 CET 2025) in Signature campaigns must be TAXED for redistribution:
But to those who think that, I say you are fascists. No human being is illegal. Therefore, the forum must remain open so that anyone can register and benefit from this redistribution.
Typical government: tax middle class, but not the ultra rich. This shouldn't be implemented on Bitcointalk alone, this should be implemented in Bitcoin on a protocol level! I propose BIP666: Capital gains can instantly be taxed when funds are moved, so if someone moves 80,000 Bitcoin from 2011, 60% of that should automatically be redistributed to all poorer addresses on the blockchain.
Bring socialism to Bitcoin now!
Yeah, let's distribute 80000
BTC to 57 million poorer address[1]. I would get nice extra money since i have some address with non-zero balance.
[1]
https://app.blockunity.io/charts/on_chain/bitcoin_non_zero_addresses
30. Post 66020690 (unedited backup) (by fillippone) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 23:03:56 CET 2025) in [Meta] Andamento sezione italiana:
Amici della board, fellow bitcoiners, rieccoci, questo mese l'attesa per il report è stata spasmodica.
Oramai la sorpresa è stata spoilerata, abbiamo un nuovo giocatore nel campo delle statistiche.
Abbiamo deciso che io continuerò a fare il mio report "classico", mentre il nostro nuovo aiutante si sbizzarrirà con nuove e mirabolanti analisi. Poi vedremo come adeguare il format nei prossimi mesi.
Intanto sento una pressione altissima alla puntualità.
Archiviamo quindi il peggior Uptober da sette anni a questa parte divertendoci ad anlizzare i numeri della board di questo mese.
[Meta] Andamento sezione italiana: ottobre 2025
| 
|
| Fig. 1. Andamento del mercato |
Situazione posts:
Fig. 2.[Local Board Post Count Evolution]Continuano le "grandi pulizie" fatte da qualche moderatore. @hostfat se ci sei, batti un colpo!
Il sito di TryNinja però ci dice che il numero di post della board nel mese è di 600. Considereremo questo numero per il proseguo del post.
|  |
| Fig. 3. Variazione dei post rispetto alla variazione del prezzo. |
RIKAFIP: Post activity per local board during October 2025
Fig. 4. [Received Merits Subsection II]
| 
|
| Fig. 5. Andamento dei Posts e dei Merits. Comparazione Board Italiana e Forum |
RIKAFIP: Merit shared per local board during October 2025
Giorno con più merits: 16/10/25 (62)
Giorno con meno merits:25/10/25 (2)
Record: 134 30 settembre 2023
Fig. 6.[Merit Senders/Receivers]
| TOP 10 MERITS RECEIVERS | | TOP10 MERIT SENDERS |
| | | |
| TOP Merit Receivers | | TOP Merit Senders |
| Sent Merits | | Received Merits |
Fig. 9.[Merit flows nella board italiana]
| 
|
| Fig. 10. [Most Merited Post/Thread] |
1.
[Meta] Andamento sezione italiana - RECAP SETTEMBRE 26 Merits
2.
Re: BITCOIN PUMP! 12 Merits
3.
Re: ARK - ARKADE la possibile soluzione di scaling perfetta8 Merits
| 
|
| Fig. 11. [Most Merited Post/Thread] |
TOP 50
Strumenti usati per l'analisi di questo mese:
@Tryninja ha implementato alcune nuove dashboard davvero fighe! Vi consiglio di guardarle.
Vi invito a curiosare un po' sui vari siti e thread: ognuno di loro fornisce informazioni diverse ed interessanti, anzi, se vedete qualcosa di interessante, e che vorreste vedere replicato in questa sede, fatemelo sapere. Proverò ad implementarlo.
Ovviamente ringrazio tutti coloro che hanno contribuito, direttamente ed indirettamente, alla stesura di questo thread. Chiaramente gli errori sono miei, ed è incredibile la quantità di errori, typo ed incongruenze che trovo ogni mese (questo mese le correzioni che ho dovuto fare sono torante ad aumentare: ben 3). Vi prego di segnalarmele anche in questa, dato che per quanto mi impegni, trovo sempre qualcosa che è sfuggita.
Mi raccomando, discutete e date feedback!
Benvenuto *Ace*
Ed anche questo mese te l'ho fatta, @Rikafip!
31. Post 66020200 (unedited backup) (by mv1986) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 21:02:26 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
the fact that someone trusts you with $500 doesn't mean you should trust him with the same amount.
I did not mention that you should deal with him or trust him for x amount of money. As I said it was all about a reference with carefully selected words. If you look at my feed back to other lenders, I added some words of appreciation because of the way they handled the loan agreement.
I understand that after some point of time people will take your trust feedback in a general manner ignoring localized/particular instances/references and applying brains, that is where I am ok with changing it.
Thanks a lot this discussion is really helpful and informative, I am confident we will have similar in future as well, but I will rest it here from my side.
Again, @LoyceV took the one line that counts. I will say this in public: I vouch for your good heart because I know you from many interactions and I see why you could possibly do this. You should not! Don't vouch for something where there is nothing to vouch for. Full stop!
Again, and by the way @LoyceV, do we all use the trust system the wrong way - you included -?
I read your guide and I get it, but the reality of how it is perceived turned out to be different than what it was supposed to be. I am too lazy to check your trust tags. Would you say you applied it correctly all the time? This is really just out of interest on a lazy evening. Cheers bros!
32. Post 66020019 (unedited backup) (by memehunter) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 20:12:08 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
the fact that someone trusts you with $500 doesn't mean you should trust him with the same amount.
I did not mention that you should deal with him or trust him for x amount of money. As I said it was all about a reference with carefully selected words. If you look at my feed back to other lenders, I added some words of appreciation because of the way they handled the loan agreement.
I understand that after some point of time people will take your trust feedback in a general manner ignoring localized/particular instances/references and applying brains, that is where I am ok with changing it.
Thanks a lot this discussion is really helpful and informative, I am confident we will have similar in future as well, but I will rest it here from my side.
33. Post 66019381 (unedited backup) (by memehunter) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 17:11:02 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
That's a very risky thing to do, even in real life.
I don't miss the opportunity to learn from you...
Since you are talking about 'real life' (life here is also real IMO though),
Trust has manyfold variations (at least two in this forum itself). There is some fundamental essence which is there in all variations. Someone trusted you with a hefty (subjective) amount (at a very short notice) because he trusted you, now how could you not trust him for that specific instance, it is a fact that he is trustworthy for that instance. Now he could gain trust and do much bigger scam in future but that's what he did (rest is speculation as of now).
Why would I trust someone in IRL (not talking about trust system here) if I know he will not keep the trust? Either I have to be totally innocent of his previous actions (neutral trust) or I have to have this belief that he is trustworthy in order to trust him. In real life also localized instances matters. I will not even trust a particular Doctor (not Doctors in general) if I believe he is not trustworthy.
Another concern is I can give a positive feedback to a particular instance where someone who had a bad record in various fields but did one thing good.
34. Post 66019277 (unedited backup) (by DrBeer) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 16:40:43 CET 2025) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
3.If n falls within the “prohibited” range of 9998–10000, repeat the generation until a number less than 9998 is obtained.
The random number they generate is a function of server seed, client seed and nonce.
The client seed, nonce and the hash of the server seed are all known before the roll.
If they generate a random number they don't like and they want to repeat the number generation so that a different number is generated, they have to change one of the above parameters.
LoyceV's experience with freebitco's free rolls may explain how they cheat users.
From what I've read, and experienced myself a few times (many years ago): their "fraucet" freerolls sometimes got "stuck", and after reloading the server seed was replaced. I can only assume that's the moment you should have won.
My algorithm is more efficient and does not allow looping, since it does not have a “pseudo-random number” to initialize the random number generator. My algorithm will ALWAYS give the “desired result”
I don't quite understand, if they initially laid down a fraudulent scheme, why did they make such a complex implementation, especially with the possibility of “freezing” and exposing their shortcomings for all to see?
If they did not plan to cheat and used a real random distribution of numbers in the range, then the number of wins should have been greater, since, in theory, pseudo-random numbers have a fairly linear distribution, unless, again, another idea or method of influencing the result was built into it.
35. Post 66019164 (unedited backup) (by memehunter) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 16:07:26 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
Ok I get the point that people can use this as an opportunity. I find merit in this argument, and I have changed the nature of my feedback. I did not include him in my trust network though.
It was like I trusted him because he trusted me but I get the point.
it look like he's using the Trust system to get loans. Repaying a loan might deserve positive feedback, giving a loan doesn't mean the user can be trusted the other way around:
Positive - You think that this person is unlikely to scam anyone.
Hard to ensure what anybody would do in future all I can do is to give a reference of what someone did at a local point.
36. Post 66019083 (unedited backup) (by mv1986) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 15:43:13 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
Minor Miner now received
DT2 positive feedback from
memehunter for:
Provided me a 0.005 BTC no collateral loan.
Memehunter gave positive feedback to others for similar reasons, that makes it look like he's using the Trust system to get loans. Repaying a loan might deserve positive feedback, giving a loan doesn't mean the user can be trusted the other way around:
Positive - You think that this person is unlikely to scam anyone.
Is the nature of my feedback wrong?
Yes, it is wrong. I will admit that hardly anyone here applies the trust system correctly (myself included) and I see your motivation, but it was wrong.
Whether someone gives you a credit line or not, nobody cares, paying back is a different pair of shoes. Positivity is not what we want. Reliable evidence for future actions. That is the way to go.
37. Post 66019082 (unedited backup) (by Satofan44) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 15:42:56 CET 2025) in AI Spam Report Reference Thread:
Gheka Banned from displaying signatures until March 21, 2026, 02:00:08 AM This account stopped posting on March 20 this year, which is no doubt the day he received a signature ban. That just means one of his accounts got a 1 year break. I don't think signature bans should be lifted if users just disappear until they can get paid again.
Perhaps you should make a thread in Meta? Change signature ban time to logged in time instead of a fixed date. That would be much better even if it can be cheated too. It would be relatively easy to do that even though I'd prefer actual time active, but that would be considerably more complex to implement.
38. Post 66019053 (unedited backup) (by memehunter) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 15:36:19 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
Minor Miner now received
DT2 positive feedback from
memehunter for:
Provided me a 0.005 BTC no collateral loan.
Memehunter gave positive feedback to others for similar reasons, that makes it look like he's using the Trust system to get loans. Repaying a loan might deserve positive feedback, giving a loan doesn't mean the user can be trusted the other way around:
Positive - You think that this person is unlikely to scam anyone.
Is the nature of my feedback wrong?
39. Post 66018987 (unedited backup) (by hopenotlate) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 15:15:19 CET 2025) in Suspicious loans given by "Minor Miner" and "gordonics.com" to "₿itcoin":
I wouldn't be surprised if they're all owned by the same person, to fake being trustworthy.
It is definitely a possibility that they are part of the same farm.
I wouldn't be surprised if they're all owned by the same person, to fake being trustworthy.
I have opened a lending service since I noticed one of our most loving lenders, @condoras passed away.
Since the demand for loans on the forum is high and the number of lenders is unusually low, I raised some funds to provide this service for the good of all.
Of all the ways a member could contribute to the forum, you decided to raise funds to reinvent yourself as a loan provider because you noticed
one of our most loving lenders passed away.
You have gone down even further in the gutter with the comment you just made. For me, it is a red line when people (such as you) that are without morals use the name of deceased members in an attempt to either save their accounts from getting tagged or try to receive merits.
It would be impossible for you to make that statement without interacting with him. How close were you to the one you refer to as
one of our most loving lenders?
How many posts did you make in the Lending board before your reinvention from a hacked/traded account to Lender? And why offer to provide that loans service rather than contribute in another way?
You might have noticed that @Bitcoin first sent his loan request to @shasan, and he politely rejected him. Then he came to my thread. I also rejected his loan request and gave him a chance to prove his loan repayment ability, then he sent me the following message. I hide those casino names cause he is my customer and I should not reveal his personal info to others. Then I asked him to provide data by which I could verify his words are true, and then he shared his payment history, which he received from those casinos for which he worked. I manually verified those data by forum representative and got to know he is telling the truth and he could repay the loan.
Although he politely convinced me that he was capable of repaying the loan, I still didn't have the courage to lend him such an amount, so I refused his request and told him that, since he was my first client, I could only give him a maximum of 300 USD.
All drama and theatrics in an attempt to misdirect from the truth.
I had bitten my tongue at the time, after the departure of Condoras which touched me particularly and I did not want to create a drama that was truly unnecessary at the time, when I saw that after only 3/4 days Minor Miner had created his lending thread using a graphic format completely similar to that of Condoras: let me say it seemed to me a move in truly bad taste to say the least ... leaving aside all the other considerations made in this thread before me
40. Post 66017184 (unedited backup) (by Darker45) (scraped on Fri Nov 7 02:31:44 CET 2025) in TRUSTED MIDDLEMAN WITH MERIT NEEDED:
Judging by you're post history, you're dealing with old ethereum wallets and funded credit cards. These trades have risks that no escrow can protect you from.
Based on his post history, it doesn't seem to me that he is looking for escrow here at all. He probably needs a trusted & aged account to add authority to some kind of offer or scheme. The fact that he included merit as a condition in this case only shows that he does not know this forum very well.
But he/she also mentioned about willingness to use "a trusted middleman or escrow" for his/her transactions. I'm with your suspicion, though. OP is probably looking for a reputable account for something else, probably to appear credible, to give more weight to offers.
Including merit as a condition shows OP knows how things work here very well. Although I don't necessarily agree, merit is probably perceived as the new measurement of reputation, at least more than rank, length of stay, activity, even trust.
Anyway, I hope you aren't a scammer, OP. But if you want to deal with the real account owners, I suggest you communicate with them here and not on Telegram. You might end up dealing with an impersonator.
41. Post 66015562 (unedited backup) (by UserU) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 17:56:49 CET 2025) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
LoyceV's experience with freebitco's free rolls may explain how they cheat users.
From what I've read, and experienced myself a few times (many years ago): their "fraucet" freerolls sometimes got "stuck", and after reloading the server seed was replaced. I can only assume that's the moment you should have won.
Damn, it happened to me multiple times as well. I used to shrug them off as connectivity issues since refreshing usually did the trick...
42. Post 66015519 (unedited backup) (by hosemary) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 17:47:07 CET 2025) in FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest:
3.If n falls within the “prohibited” range of 9998–10000, repeat the generation until a number less than 9998 is obtained.
The random number they generate is a function of server seed, client seed and nonce.
The client seed, nonce and the hash of the server seed are all known before the roll.
If they generate a random that they don't like and they want to repeat the generation so that a different number is generated, they have to change one of the above parameters.
LoyceV's experience with freebitco's free rolls may explain how they cheat users.
From what I've read, and experienced myself a few times (many years ago): their "fraucet" freerolls sometimes got "stuck", and after reloading the server seed was replaced. I can only assume that's the moment you should have won.
43. Post 66014440 (unedited backup) (by examplens) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 12:56:19 CET 2025) in TRUSTED MIDDLEMAN WITH MERIT NEEDED:
Judging by you're post history, you're dealing with old ethereum wallets and funded credit cards. These trades have risks that no escrow can protect you from.
Based on his post history, it doesn't seem to me that he is looking for escrow here at all. He probably needs a trusted & aged account to add authority to some kind of offer or scheme. The fact that he included merit as a condition in this case only shows that he does not know this forum very well.
44. Post 66013671 (unedited backup) (by lovesmayfamilis) (scraped on Thu Nov 6 08:06:19 CET 2025) in Two alternative accounts, one of which forgot to re-login.:
The story is trivial. Two alt accounts, one of which was cited in a plagiarism thread, began actively seeking the truth and defending themselves. Everything can be verified in the thread. One claims they didn't copy, after which the second appears, forgetting to change their usernames, and writes the same apology under the first name. They then edit the post, using some obscure phrases, but LoyceV's archive remembers everything.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6601/66013623.htmlAs a result, two accounts violate the company's signature rules by participating with their alt accounts.
This was just a one mistake and sincerely I didn’t find the link else I would have added the link as I do not intend to take credit for another’s work and I even stated previously that not all works where from me and I couldn’t find the links to the works as it took me some time to draft the topic.
All I beg is that you tender justice with mercy as it was something I also acknowledged before now that I didn’t find the link and I didn’t expect it to called plagiarism since I added a disclaimer to the post. Thank you.
Just copy this and send for your clarity @ojinga. Added after realizing the mistakeThis was just a one mistake and sincerely I didn’t find the link else I would have added the link as I do not intend to take credit for another’s work and I even stated previously that not all works where from me and I couldn’t find the links to the works as it took me some time to draft the topic.
All I beg is that you tender justice with mercy as it was something I also acknowledged before now that I didn’t find the link and I didn’t expect it to called plagiarism since I added a disclaimer to the post. Thank you.
Now it's also an alternate account that forgot to re-login. Bravo!
I managed to quote the first post.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6601/66013623.html
45. Post 66012476 (unedited backup) (by Hazink) (scraped on Wed Nov 5 22:07:14 CET 2025) in AI Spam Report Reference Thread:
My conclusion is that probably all posts contain a certain percentage of AI content, the only question is how much which detector can detect the same, given that the user probably uses a humanizer after generating the text.
Have you tried using
Undetectable AI tool to scan through the rest of the post which was not marked as AI either due to using humanized AI tools? I just checked the rest of the post and the results for two: 70%+ AI probability and 64% AI probability. The other two are showing above 50% humanly written.
What's the verdict on Member
Jaksonhard?
That is a very clear explanation of how soft-forks actually rely on hashrate support. If the majority of miners do not back it, the chain risks splitting and becoming a minority fork with very low activity. Just as you said, examples like BCH or BSV show how vulnerable the smaller chains could be if bigger miners ever decided to interfere. In the final instance, it is much better for communities to seek consensus rather than race toward forks, since every disagreement that turns into a split just creates another altcoin and more division in space.
Yah sure I get your point completely. People are free to create new chains or make changes as they deem desirable, but doing so doesn't make much sense when simpler, forkless solutions exist. Just creating unnecessary hard or soft forks splits the community and results in more altcoins that fix nothing at all. If something can be fixed with improvements such as adjusting the Initial Blockchain Download, then it's smarter and cleaner than dividing the chain for no good reason.
If a soft-fork changes how these are treated, it could easily feel like confiscation to the original owner. Another concern is that temporary soft-forks have never really been tested on a large scale, so no one can say for sure if those rules would ever be safely lifted. In some cases, what starts as a soft-fork might later become a hard-fork, especially if different miner groups choose to stick with different rule sets.
74% AI detected
You made a very good point. many people still prefer short-term trading because they want quick profits, while they usually don't pay too much attention to the risks involved. It is never easy to time the market, and at the worst, waiting for a dip that may never materialize can result in missed opportunities. The movement of Bitcoin's price is unpredictable, and those who depend on a short-term strategy usually end up being stressed or make emotional decisions. Unfortunately, some people still maintain that Bitcoin is going to fail someday. They tend to remain unaware of how much changes have taken place in the technology, adoption, and trust of Bitcoin. Only those who remain patient, believing in the long-term potential, get a chance to benefit as the market continues to mature.
61% Ai detected
46. Post 66012336 (unedited backup) (by Zoomic) (scraped on Wed Nov 5 21:22:37 CET 2025) in Did I lose my money forever doing this swap?:
. Does anyone know what happened and if there is anything I can do? The website has no customer support or anyway to contact them.
If website has no support, no forum presence, no telegram presence, it should already be a red flag. I know that some projects have customer support and even telegram presence and yet still scam and go free. But atleast, you should have made sure there's a support system for your after sales services.
Just try and see if there's a way to contact the support. This looks like selective scamming as LoyceV had noted. No where to tell your story and they'll continue having new victims.
47. Post 66012331 (unedited backup) (by Zoomic) (scraped on Wed Nov 5 21:21:55 CET 2025) in Did I lose my money forever doing this swap?:
. Does anyone know what happened and if there is anything I can do? The website has no customer support or anyway to contact them.
If website has no support, no forum presence, no telegram presence, it should already be a red flag. I know that some projects have customer support and even telegram presence and yet still scam and go free. But atleast, you should have made sure there's a support system for your after sales services.
Just try and see if there's a way to contact the support. This looks like selective scamming as LoyceV had noted. No where to tell your story and they'll continue having new victims.
48. Post 66012107 (unedited backup) (by Vod) (scraped on Wed Nov 5 20:01:49 CET 2025) in TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk:
The "alt" text is what shows on the page when the image can't be loaded. It's a relic from old times, kinda like SMF is.
Not true! From ChatGPT:
Here’s what it’s used for:
Accessibility – Screen readers read the alt text aloud, allowing visually impaired users to understand what the image shows.
Fallback content – If the image fails to load (e.g., due to a broken link), the browser displays the alt text instead.
SEO (Search Engine Optimization) – Search engines use alt text to understand what an image is about, improving your page’s visibility in image search results.
Context clarity – It provides context to the image within the page’s content, especially when the image conveys essential information.
Alt tags are so important that pages may not be indexed fully by some engines.
