You need to start it after a long period of inactivity, so that CPU miner Bob has reorged another CPU miner Charlie (the chain of which you were following) and an ASIC miner mined on top of Bob instead of Charlie.

Try stopping it, and starting it tomorrow at the current time. It has to be definitely this, because the error clearly says that another block header was expected, which signifies the chain was reorged, and now my chain, and therefore my index is questioned.

I do not know how moderators handle reports, but if could  there be a way to have a list of fixed quotes( something like what you have up here or other suggestions) which can be selected by a mod to replace the deleted post. The post would still be deleted as usual, but its content would eventually be replaced with a selected format in existing quotes made by other users.

In other words, a report could list every identifier of posts that quoted the deleted one, and then the quoted content could be updated using an option chosen by a moderator.

Another constraint is that mods aren't allow to update a post. Is it?

If you never declare and never claim the prize, you will never pay anything, nor logically receive anything. That's because without a ticket, there's no proof that the prize is yours.

Having the ticket and claiming the prize is one thing. Even if you haven't received the money yet, you'll still have to pay the tax.
Another thing is that if you don't claim the prize, even if you keep the ticket in a safe, no one from the government will know you have it. If years later (I think there's a deadline to claim the prize), you go and claim the prize, logically you'll have to pay the tax.

Either way, it's a problem I'll never experience because I simply don't participate in those things.





This situation always has to involve very high values.

Now, when a person wants to make a move through the legal system, so to speak, they have to file a declaration. Then, they just need proof of the origin. The problem is never at the entrance, it's at the exit. When you leave, you have to prove the origin. Whether you should have paid something beforehand or not is another question, but as long as the person pays, everything is fine.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual to act based on the information and evidence they have.

A drop in the ocean, that I wouldn't like to spill myself.


Exactly! Everyone's lives are different, so in my case, it isn't worth the risk. Life's brought things that way that I have to account for multiple lives now, not only mine, so I'm de-risking every possible issue.


Honestly, the only thing I want in my life is simplicity. I want to have the minimum amount of interaction with the State that's possible.

---

Food for thought again, with a hypothetical scenario (or not so hypothetical).

1. The forum is monitored by the authorities.
2. A company has scammed people, or wants to launder money and they launch a signature campaign in the forum.
3. The authorities know about the existence of this company and they monitor the transactions (users, amounts, blockchain data etc).
4. The authotities search for a specific user and find their real-life data (not very difficult to do - trust me).
5. Now, they simply keep track of the user's actions.

Would this user prefer to have declared all of their income, showing that they got it simply for advertising reasons or would he prefer to keep everything in the shadows?
Would this user be able to spend easily (or cash out) his stash after 10 years of being paid? Would he be bothered by the authorities if he tried to cash out a significant amount of money? Or buy a car for example.

I changed my mind. It was pretty much his entire history. It seems his remaining post was deleted also, so looks like another staff users deleted that. I've nuked the account. I try to be lenient, but I also don't want to do a disservice to the existing community, because users are reporting these types of users, and while the reported posts might get dealt with, they might slip under the radar in the future and that's when the community starts losing faith in us moderators.

So, I revisited it, and nuked the account. They've been caught before, they got caught this time, and will likely continue in the future as none of their posts remained on their profile so at that point there's not a lot of benefit of the doubt to be given.

Thanks for everyone that does report these, as well as post here highlighting these types of users.

Now I don't understand. If you never claim the prize, nobody knows who won. Buying a lottery ticket remains anonymous (or am I mistaken? I don't play, so I don't know). If you never claim the prize, you'll never pay anything, because in the end nobody knows who won.

Generally speaking, I understand that things are already complicated with Bitcoin in some countries.

Fortunately, in Portugal – not yet – it's not complicated; you just need to know how to manage it well. But you never know what the authorities will come up with tomorrow.

There are also no guarantees that the forum will even exist in 10 years. The world is changing day by day, technologies are evolving very quickly, and especially online communication platforms. Forums mostly exist for those who don’t find this format too outdated or strange, or for those who have already gotten used to it. And it’s clear that those who are used to it have already had time to grow into meaningful ranks. But newbies who register today won’t be motivated by a high rank that takes 10 years to reach, without knowing what will happen in a year or two, let alone in a decade.

This is because a lot of Indians have their coins on exchanges like Binance which basically pools the users' funds into their own address instead of holding their funds in individual addresses.
This consolidates the users' holdings into just a few addresses. Thus millions of peoples' funds are basically stored in a few addresses only.
The above funded bitcoin addresses are just taken into count when balance is greater than zero.

For exchange deposit addresses, the funds are moved into exchange addresses thus keeping individual deposit addresses to zero and thus skipping those addresses.
May be this is why the number of bitcoin funded addresses on-chain is far lower than actual number of Indian bitcoin owners.
But yeah, it is true that India has the highest number of bitcoin owners as posted by multiple sites.

I think its AI, and have removed the posts that were reported. Obviously, they have a history of using AI pointed out by ABCbits above. Although, that wasn't the only contributing factor. I find the AI tends to:

- Add a lot of 'fluff' without actually nailing the point. Which BitadzZ typically did a lot in those posts.
- Uses weird words at certain points, because it hallucinates. BitadzZ did do this quite a lot, so its either being word spinned or ran through a translator a few times
- AI is overly polite and follows a sort of standard I agree with you on these x,y,z but....then goes onto explain what you can do better etc. BitadzZ did that a lot in those posts.

I think they are trying to mask the fact they are using AI though. Adding certain imperfections, usually not through misspellings or anything like that, but rather changing words which results in less natural way of writing text sometimes it does hallucinate. AI usually is good at flow of a sentence, which humans aren't. Also, generally users have a sort of consistent way of speaking, but every post came across different.

Also, their posts were grammatically correct almost every single time without a single mistake. I don't know what you, but I tend to edit my posts a lot due to mistakes.

So, when combining all of these factors, plus their use of AI in the past which also demonstrated a little of the above points. Deleted posts, and will be keeping an eye on them.

Fun you say. I think Theymos messing with people’s rank on April fool’s days is enough fun already (which I don’t find amusing enough) rather than messing with the ranking system for fun, I think it’ll more appropriate to try something else. Cos tinkering with the ranking system for no other reason but fun feels a bit unnecessary. I don’t know about others but I think the ranking system is meant to predictable, consistent and earned, and not something people have to second guess. It works better when they’re stable, boring and fair, not something someone can just wake up one morning and alter cos they wanna have fun. I mean fun’s cool but not when it comes at the expense of people’s trust in the system. My 1 cent opinion.

But this case is correct. The player received the money.
If he never reports the ticket fraud, even though he won, he will never receive the money.

Either way, I think you understood the idea I wanted to convey. 

A new rank might not be a bad idea.. Maybe activity of 3,000 and merit of 6,000 (2x the activity)

or

maybe even better activity of 3,000 and merit of 4,500 (1.5x the activity).

A higher than Legendary rank necessary or not?  I am not sure, even though several times over the years, I have seen proposals for a higher than Legendary rank.

I checked his writing. But AI was not detected.

Copyleaks: No AI Detected
Sapling: 3% AI
Quillbot: No AI Detected
Zerogpt: No AI Detected
Originality: 99% Original

---

I am unable to use the Stealthwriter AI detector site. I am facing this problem when I try to check any text. Are you facing the same problem?

Theymos has been doing a pretty good job keeping data on the forum intact so far. But it ain't bad idea to have backup plan for something important. Hopefully I'll be here long enough to have so much PM's I'll be bothered if I lost them all suddenly. I would suggest something like LoyceV archive but it won't be feasible because of privacy issues.

Probably you don't have that much PM or I'm quoting wrongly via my reference to the view all button on normal boards we post.

Very true... A newbie can confidently set the goal of becoming a legendary member and it will damn happen. But if a rank that takes upto a decade to be achieved is introduced, no newbie will want to set the goal to make it to that rank.
Meanwhile, before that 10 years, there will be call for another rank.

I think I am used to this legendary as the highest rank. Last year when I was active in the Altcoinstalks forum, I didn't care or even regard ranks higher than legendary. I always treated legendary as the highest rank. Meanwhile, here in the forum, I don't fail to recognise and respect people with higher merits, activity and post count. Then TBH, men like LoyceV, fillippone, etc deserve another rank lol.

@LoyceV trying to make things right, would like to double the prize and send it please confirm if its the same address you want it to be sent to

Are boating accidents with bitcoin a common thing in the Netherlands? If they aren't, they should be. I hope more and more Dutch bitcoin holders will have boating accidents. The government deserves it. After all, why don't they use the taxpayer money to better protect their coastline on the North Sea against such accidents? it's dangerous to take your crypto out on the boat.

I don't know where you're from, but if it wasn't a pain in the ass here and such a lengthy process, perhaps I would consider declaring them as well. The current legislation makes it unprofitable to earn an X sum of money through campaigns, just to spend a Y fixed amount on taxes every month. I haven't considered how I'm going to move my funds when the time comes, but I remember I had asked for suggestions a while ago in the forum and maybe I'll be able to pull it off with P2P transactions in person perhaps.

Unfortunately,  aprt from one extra quote, the OP of the thread also quoted it, not sure if it would be regard as offtopic with the context of the quote body.

True, didn't  even think about this.
Oops, that's another view. The more I think about it, the deeper it gets.
The main blocker now is what you've mentioned in the first quote, that the quotes can be edited. If not for that, then editing manually by a mod using this:....could have worked, but then persistence across existing quotes (the affected post) and maybe the introduction of new complications is also another thing to consider..

Yes, you're right, but the issue is that no one knows the reason it might have been deleted when it's being clicked and nothing shows up, as long as it's a single post and not a thread. Unless it could just redirect them to the page showing the reason why the post was deleted. So even if anyone already quoted it and they try to see that particular quote, it redirects to that page (I am not sure every user will like this either, apart from those who won't even bother to narrow down to the post).

I noticed last day regarding your quote, and that was missing. Implementing your suggestion won't solve anything at all; you can just add or edit if the quote is deleted as @LoyceV suggested. But from the forum end, a message could be added for the deleted quote. For example, if a thread is deleted, we can see a message like the one below:


For deleting a quote or reply, they would use another message just for formalities;

"The replies/quote you are looking for appear to be deleted by a mod or user."

But I don't think it's helpful to verify the quote, because it's easy to manipulate the quote. Rather simply, you can archive the quote and post the link as well, besides quoting someone's post. So we can verify whether the quote is authentic or not. Your suggestion would just increase developers' jobs and not help forum users, though it could be simply implemented by a line of code about return page.

Even though I read slowly and tried to understand what he meant, I still didn't get the point.   

Originality: 100% Confident That's AI
Copyleaks: 100 AI
ZeroGPT: 87.06%
QuillBot: 100 AI
undetectable: 99% AI Probability
Sapling: 100% Fake

It depends on what shape Bitcoin will be trying to imitate physically, because if it is trying to imitate the form of a drawing, painting or craft, then it's qualified to be regarded as an art. But in a nutshell, if it tries to imitate the shape and form of a random object like book, pen or possibly hard drive, then such can't be regarded as an art. Because the truth of the fact is that what makes a piece of art more is simply because of the environment the art finds itself, and what the people thinks the art represents. Because an art that worth €100M in Europe Auction sales might get to Africa, and people who doesn't know what it stands for or represent might price it at less than $1000, simply because they don't know it's original worth. And when it comes to the case of Bitcoin, it's worth it different, simply because it's current price value is tagged to it, and no matter where you go in the entire world, it can still be sold at it's exact price value. Hence, if I'm to choose between an artwork worth €100M and Bitcoin worth €1M, I will definitely go for the €1M in Bitcoin, reason been that it can easily be traded anywhere around the world at the same value. Unlike the €100M art that it will be very hard to see someone willing to buy it at it's exact same value anywhere around the world.

Pohlepnim parazitima želim samo najgore i nadam se da će ovom planiranom izmjenom zakona mnogo manje novca ubaciti u svoje kase nego što bi imali da nisu ništa dirali. Mislim da je LoyceV iz Nizozemske. On bi sigurno imao više informacija o ovoj tematici. Koliko se sjećam, on je prestao učestvovati u signature kampanjama online kasina/kladionica jer su nizozemci već uveli neki čudan zakon koji to reguliše. Ima neke veze sa starosti korisnika online kasina, gdje kasino mora da vodi i prikazuje tu statistiku ili tako nešto. Objašnjenje mi nema smisla ali boljeg se ne mogu sjetiti. @LoyceV možeš li pojasniti?

If it's sealed and you don't know its private key, you only have a physical asset that gives you access to a digital asset, but you don't yet possess the digital asset itself.

If you have a winning scratch-off ticket but never scratch it, you never receive the prize even though technically it's yours. 

It's been two years since o_e_l_e_o has left the forum. Leo was a guaranteed presence in the technical discussions about Bitcoin and one of the best individuals to turn to when you had Bitcoin-related problems. May he rest in peace.
I am not sure what happened to 1miau and why they left but it's always sad to lose a valuable member in a place like Bitcointalk.

The word "ninja" is already in his username, so why shouldn't he get the award? Besides the name, he has built one of the most useful websites for Bitcointalk users.
If LoyceV isn't a ninja, then I don't know who is. Always active and reliable if you need him.

All three are very knowledgeable about Bitcoin. If there is a tough problem that needs solving, chances are high they will know how. igor72 isn't as active as the other two, but his posts caught my eye.

I will only nominate one in this category. These guys fought long and hard to get their own local board. Ever since they did, it's been one of the most active local forums on Bitcointalk. Congrats.

BitList because I like the idea of a collection of no-KYC exchanges and mixers. Plus, it's also where Ninjastic.Space is now located.
Talkimg because it filled a void that was left after Imgur stopped working.

Howard seems like a passionate collector and nice bloke. I took part in one of his raffles and won.

His profile says he is an asshole but I never got that impression. Those active in Scam Accusations know the work that holydarkness provides there. I know there are others, but his name is the most common occurrence.

Three very different people. PowerGlove is the dev, working quietly in the background. I like seeing the regular stats that LoyceV and Rikafip produce each month.

I will vote for myself, for the fun of it and not because of my ego. I think we have one of the best local boards on the forum, even it it's not as active as some of the bigger ones. I am often there, making quality posts. Those bastards better appreciate it or else I won't give them any merits. Rikafip is another very active and quality member in the CRO local. But I am still better.

I never know who to vote for in this category. None of the alleged Bitcointalk women have ever sent me nudes as proof, so I don't know who they are. Only men have. I am voting for Mia Chloe because 'Mia' is a women's name. @Mia Chloe, if you are not female, dude you got a female username.

Most merit users in Bitcointalk includes initial merit. The list has only 70 users with 5000+ merits now and there are only 17 users with 10000+ merits.
https://bpip.org/Report?r=mostmerit

Still in progress.
Format of user Kingsden used here

He is my mentor in cryptographer. Forever in my heart Hal.

LoyceV: Active in the technical board

JayJuanGee: He is someone who knows the true value of Bitcoin

First bitcointalk.org event I am participating

I have been transformed ever since I joined this forum

Obim34: Help to clean the lb from spammers
Mia Chloe: Help to clean the lb from spammers

Being into Reddit, bitcoin blogs, and many forums online, never knew a place like Bitcointalk.org exist until now.

I don't know him much, but after making my research, he has held many art contest in the forum. I commend his work.

The oldest and respected member of the Nigerian Local board.

She has the most active lending thread in the local board. Many members can say good of her service, though I haven't patronized her.

But that can easily be abused by someone, and than they can continue attacking the website by bypassing the captchas.
I don't think bridgoro exchange can't be compared with bitcointalk forum, since two websites are working in a different way and use different software.

That’s crazy, I haven’t moved any Bitcoin since October. It wasn’t long ago that even 1 sat/vbyte seemed a dream.
The price of Bitcoin has been disappointing, to me at least but you can’t deny that nothing else beats it. Where else could you move $5bn across the world on a Sunday night for less than $100 fee?

I remember the moment when you announced that news in our local board, and I can't believe so much times passed since you came back in forum, but I am glad you are back.

I heard Netherlands is planning to introduce new annual tax on unrealized bitcoin gains, but that also includes stocks, bonds, and other assets.
It's going to be much ''fun'' living in EU in next few years 
https://cryptotale.org/netherlands-plans-annual-tax-on-unrealized-bitcoin-gains/

You know this about other wallet right? The desktop version

This is just an accusation. And the only one out there (ledger trezor etc have way more acusations)
I dont think the user lost funds for this reason. Much more likely his own fault.

 he probably was careless  (a person who put a life saving in his mobile wallet cant be trusted about security practices imo).


I also tried cake and unstoppable.  They are not crap, but they arent as good as coinomi.

Just being open source doesnt mean the source code and the app are good. Just mean that anyone can see it.

Sure, but using old outdated crap wallet is more risky, and Cake can also be installed on computer.
Monero have dynamic fee algorithm, it's not fixed, but it's usually few cents per transaction,

That coinimi crap is literally not working, but you can do whatever you like.

What the heck are you talking abouuz and why do you need to lie?!
I used coinomi, and that is why I can say it's big crap.
With all due respect I stopped listening to your questionable wallet recommendations long time ago.

To clarify: I never intended to create a flag or cause any financial harm to this member. I’m fully aware that negative trust can affect someone’s ability to borrow or trade on the forum, and that wasn’t my goal at all.

I’m relatively new to how flags, the reputation system, and support mechanics work here. I mostly post in the Scam Accusations section when I come across casinos that ignore responsible gambling practices. My focus has always been on helping victims stand up to crypto casinos that operate with little to no accountability or regulatory oversight. This forum is one of the few places where they can actually be challenged, since most of them originated here and still care about their reputation on Bitcointalk.

That's a weak argument. If that would be true, you could win by picking the opposite outcome.
[/quote]

Look, about that "pick the opposite" thing – it only really works if the casino is stuck using a strict nonce that goes 0,1,2,3... no skips, and they can't simulate stuff ahead of time. But in a lot of these shady setups, they have full control over when to rotate seeds or how the nonce moves, so they can run simulations, toss out the ones where players win big, and just publish the losing sequence. You betting opposite wouldn't do because you're already seeing the rigged result – the verifier just checks it matches, not if it was fairly picked.

Honestly, I think with bigger bets, yeah, some places probably have extra "checks" in the backend to tilt things their way without making it obvious across all games. That's how they protect the house on high stakes.

To actually get some trust going, these casinos should just open up and share real aggregated stats – like overall RTP numbers from massive sample sizes, or even full public histories for their in-house games so anyone can crunch the numbers. Most of 'em don't even give you proper verifiable history beyond your own recent bets, which makes it impossible for us to properly audit if it's fair over the long run.

If they did that kinda transparency, it'd separate the legit ones from those hiding behind "provably fair" as some kinda of marketing shield. Right now it's too easy for doubts to stick around. I'm no iGaming dev, I don't know anyone on the inside, and I've got no axe to grind beyond this: my opinion comes purely from playing thousands upon thousands of hands on original blackjack games (and other in-house titles) across a bunch of different crypto casinos over the years. The patterns I've seen with my own eyes are what make me skeptical, nothing more complicated than that.

I am with LoyceV here, I dont like installing new software.
I tried cake and it is not as good as coinomi.

I think you are too harsh in your opinion about coinomi dkbit98

Coinomi isn't crap. There is a bug in transaction history monero wallet, but the wallet is working to send and receive and set fees. Better than 90% of monero wallets.

Coinomi is working since 2014. It supports basically all coins in existence,  they offer some exchanges integration, good UI and many advamced feafures for each blockchain.

You can use coinomi just alone in your phone instead of one wallet for each blockchain

I want to clarify something, because this keeps getting framed as retaliation or an attempt to harm someone’s livelihood — that is not the intent.

The goal here is to bring attention to a recurring issue that keeps getting dismissed in this forum: the blind trust placed in “provably fair” claims, especially when it comes to in-house / original casino games.

I did not create a flag deliberately. A flag directly impacts revenue and turns the discussion into defense mode instead of analysis. The intention here is to highlight behavior and technical risk so it does not continue unchecked, particularly when people expose scams or questionable practices.

The problem is that this community often treats crypto casinos as if they are inherently trustworthy, while many members have never:
- tested edge cases,
- audited implementations,
- or experienced how easily original games can be manipulated behind a “provably fair” label.

To add technical context, I’m quoting a post from a developer with long-term iGaming experience. This is not emotional speculation — it’s how poorly implemented systems are actually abused.


This is the core issue.

Provably fair is not a guarantee of fairness.
It is a deterministic verification system that depends entirely on honest implementation.

The question isn’t whether casinos can do this — they can.
The question is whether the forum should keep dismissing these concerns just because verification passes.

This is about awareness and accountability, not revenge.

Actually the model does change, but the taxes increase It's almost as the system is trying to make it look easier and better for someone who earns really a small amount of money, to try to hide it. I mean, financially, if someone earns such small amounts from here and there, it's almost as the system tells them to hide it or stop it, instead of finding a solution for these people.

---

If I get paid, in any form of money, I need to declare it and pay taxes upon it, regardless of whether I sold or used the money. Think of it this way, we're in EU, so we have Euros. If I was paid in Euros, keeping it in my bank account and not using it for 10 years, would that be tax free? Of course not! It doesn't matter that it's bitcoin. The investment tax will come when I sell and get a profit, but the income tax comes instantly when you get paid.

---

Yeah, this is my conclusion as well. I'm using it for fun and as I said above, I'm using it as much as I want, not as much as I can.

---

Wow, we're proving our age here or what? Incredible piece and it must have been long before 1991, but can't really say how old it may be. (lazy to look for details - but the internet says 1983)

Penulis: Upgrade00
Topik Original: [GUIDE] Overview of the trust flags

---

---

(Upgrade00) mutusin buat ngelakuin riset singkat soal sistem trust baru, biar user bisa paham semuanya dalam satu thread.

Semua akun yang disebut di sini hanya contoh, dan TS tidak mendukung ataupun menentang tuduhan apa pun.

Apa itu Trust Flag?

Trust flag diperkenalkan buat ngembangin sistem trust yang lama.
Thread resminya: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.0
Fungsinya buat peringatan ke member bahwa seseorang diduga scammer atau melanggar kontrak.
Sistem trust lama cuma nunjukin histori kepercayaan user secara umum (positif, netral, negatif). Sedangkan trust flag cuma buat feedback negatif. Trust biasa bisa dihapus tapi Trust flag TIDAK bisa dihapus kalau sudah aktif

Supaya aktif, sebuah flag butuh minimal 3 support lebih banyak daripada oposisi. Yang dihitung cuma support dari trust group kamu. Untuk warga biasa kek kita, sistem pakai Default Trust (DT).

Tipe dari flags
- Newbie warning flags: Flag ini diberikan berdasarkan bukti dari pihak lain, bukan kejadian yang langsung melibatkan kamu.

Biasanya muncul sebagai peringatan buat newbie, guest, dan member dengan waktu login < 7 hari. User lain cuma lihat tanda # di skor trust.
Kita ambil contoh kasus si , The-One-Above-All. Akun ini dapet newbie warning flag yang muncul di atas topik & profilnya.

---

-: Contract-violation flags: Flag ini dipakai kalau kejadian langsung melibatkan kamu. Contohnya, user NLNico mengaktifkan sebuah flag kepada user SafeDice dan dapet support lebih banyak dari oposisi (>3). The flag akhirnya terdisplay di user' (Terduga penipu) ringkasan kepercayaan dan juga topik-topiknya di atas (yang terlihat oleh semua anggota).

---

Kalian juga dapat mengaksesnya melalui umpan balik/feedback yang telah dikirim. NLNico

User yang belum login (logged-out) juga bakal dapet peringatan.

• Flag aktif → warna kuning.
• Contract violation flag + red trust → warna merah → otomatis munculin "Warning: Trade with extreme caution" berdasarkan skor kepercayaan pengguna
• Newbie warning flag juga bisa tampil kuning atau merah
• Satu user bisa kena dua jenis flag sekaligus
• Kalian tidak dapat membuat laporan menggunakan thread yang dimoderasi sendiri sebagai linkutama. Sebaiknya juga jangan menggunakan unggahan dari terduga penipu, melainkan arsipkan bukti-bukti tersebut, buat unggahan baru, dan tautkan semua bukti di sana.

Siapa yang Bisa Bikin Flag?

Siapa pun bisa bikin Newbie Warning Flag → Asal support > oposisi

User yang jadi korban scam bisa bikin Contract Violation Flag → Hanya terlihat di trust network kamu → Butuh minimal 3 support lebih banyak dari oposisi
Flag bisa dibuat lewat link di profil user.
Tapi inget, pastikan bukti kuat sebelum bikin atau support flag;

Berapa Lama Flag Aktif?

Batasan Membuat Flag:

Apakah Flag Menghapus Negative Trust Lama?

Jawabannya: tidak.
Negative trust sebelum sistem flag tidak otomatis dikonversi jadi flag. Namun

Sampaikan saran, tambahan, dan koreksi bila ada.

---

Useful links -

• LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates]
• DefaultTrust changes
• LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

---

---

Terjemahan ini di buat atas inisiasi:

LoyceV has his own server and I trust him enough to believe he is not tracking anyone.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5554840.0

You can also send transactions with sub 1 sat/vByte fees, so a plus…

I don't know about coinomi but all other wallets I used have the option to manually choose fees for monero.
Honestly I would never use coinomi crap when there is very good Cake wallet, and all other options.
Unlike coinomi they actively work on code all the time I post regular updates.

I kept thinking about those words...


If you don't have it... you can't use it. If you have it, and you don't use it... it's the same for now.

So why not just hold it and decide when to use it when you feel it's most appropriate, with the least possible complications?

It's similar to people who say they don't invest because they have to pay taxes. But if they don't invest, they're losing money. If they invest and make a profit, they'll earn more than you had, even after paying taxes.


Now, of course, everyone knows the reality of their own country and their own life. Therefore, they should act wisely based on that knowledge, doing what is best for themselves and their loved ones.


It was merely a reflection, with no intention of questioning or criticizing motives or decisions. Like any investment, one should only risk what one is willing to lose.

Man, what year was that? 1991?

I honestly barely even touch a regular computer these days. I go weeks at a time without sitting down at one. If it wasn’t for mobile phones with dictation, I would probably struggle to make one post per day here…

Last respect to the departed Heros

LoyceV: Everywhere you go
Vapourminer: Shows up when you think no one is watching.

JayJuanGee: He is here for bitcoin and not for the few bucks.
Charles-Tim: Gives alot and open to learning more.

Now bitcoin is officially both a currency and an asset.

Credit to who created and to who is maintaining the bitcointalk.org domain.

igebotz: Always with a solution when approached for succour.
Pmalek: Follows up a question/problem till it's solved.

Good knowledge of bitcoin, thinks he is more intelligent than everyone in the forum and ended up showing that you can use the feedback system as you want and not as the forum requires.

Hhampuz: For his consistency
Little Mouse: From little to a big brand, it's hard work and not a miracle.

The name that rings when Nigeria Local Board is remembered.

Floxynice: A woman serving her community in the best possible way. Floxynice Quick Naira Loan
lovesmayfamilis: Can ask the reason a lamb is led to the slaughter, even as a woman.

What do you think?
I tried my best! Obviously, I had to slow down the tool to avoid getting banned.

i lugged around a TRS-80 4P "luggable"" computer back in the day. i can do it again.

Anything you need to know about bitcoins strategic most reserve, The US government  sign to establish  a strategic bitcoin reserve like that others companies are doing, but considering that this is there first act of making a purpose but the value of bitcoins it self, this regulation is part of government to be able to monitor under president Donald thump signed and executive order  in the march of 2025 to establish  a strategic reserve, government just need to be protected it because there’s no protection for users.

Crypto capital of the world, this reserve will consist Of bitcoins forfeited by federal agencies
There’s a bipartisan Collings of the text of billing which will need more discussion before approval. And again there’s are some people that are still doubting about bitcoins strategic but most of them there are illiterate.

Sorry mate, but today I noticed that the version I had installed is no longer running, it crashed again! Unfortunately, I wasn't able to see what kind of error the console was giving.
I'll try the new version now and see if the problem persists, hoping that this time I'll be able to get some data from the console.

I can't disagree that our taxes are a total waste in Greece, but doing things legally is a must for me 

---

No, it's per transaction nature. Meaning if I sell 4 paintings in my lifetime, it's considered a business. If I get paid 4 times for advertising, it's considered a business etc.

I can't say how much I agree on the comment about "social media".

---

Haha, it's funny because I'm the exact opposite. I type faster than I write, but I type too slowly. Imagine how slowly I write. 

---

Sure, but I still think you can spot them and ignore them easily I must have ignored users who aren't AI though lol

 Too much to say about this user but I fear there'd not be enough space to fill it, but all I know, his impact would remain indelible. Rest on champ!..This other user took out time to impact in areas and places that seemed out of his jurisdiction but still we felt the impact nonetheless.


This users tend to keep the forum in check, always cooking up new ideas to make this place more unique and different from other social platforms.



Their knowledge about everything in the forum and Bitcoin related topics in particular is exceptional. Such valuable materials the forum has.


One thing this forum is peculiar for is it's ability to make room for users to display their talents: be it to show their talent with art tools or displaying their skill in the kitchen, the forum doesn't disappoint. This event was one of them that allowed users showcase their different delicacies and it's fun to be able to display this to the community.






These two have put it upon themselves to be the forum police, fighting to keep the place free of scammers, and not doing it just for the acknowledgements alone but to maintain a clean environment safe enough for people to use.


They've managed to maintain a great reputation for themselves as the top campaign managers and for Hhampuz, it only takes genius to be able to handle the number of campaigns he has and still find time to bring other educational and recreational activities to help the users maximize their skills.


Without CB, there wouldn't have been room for others to come in, he made it possible, along with others to ensure that those from the Nigerian board can have a place where people can have a home far from home. Mia's creative ideas has also helped to balance the local board.


Oh, I just love these two for their fearlessness and bravery. It's not everyday you'd see a woman campaigning to be a merit source tmfor the gambling board but this user has kept on proving her worth and showing up. Same as Lovesmayfamilis, ever vigilant and well commended for her knack for fishing out treacherous behaviors.

You need to wait your transactions to "received" not "not processed" to spend. I think 



I also clicked "processes transactions " in the send tab.

 Yes, I understood very well, rules are rules, and I understand that if you postpone and or 
 even cancel a round because of delays in answers, in a way
 you would be breaking your rules,
 maybe the right thing would be a punishment?

 Thank you, now I'm much more thoughtful hehehe...


-No.

Thanks. I was able to send you 0.01 usd .I think it worked.

Monero is now more expensive than bitcoin. That's unexpected.


I think you are right. Similar to unconfirmed transaction

Even transactions paying 0.14 sat/vByte have been confirmed in several blocks mined in the last 24 hours and perhaps even before that. According to the data on mempool.space, transactions paying 0.14 sat/vByte are only two or three blocks away right now. It's been a long time since I have seen such a great opportunity to consolidate inputs as in the last couple of days. Too bad that I already did mine in the past.

Somewhat new user here...

Several of my posts have received merit, and I do think the system works mostly fine, however I do think more users could be generous with their sendable merit.  Just me 2 cents.

Here is some food for thought derived straight from the subject raised by apogio.

The way Bitcoin Talk users change their habit based on incentive or the lack thereof is in my opinion pretty strong proof why Nodes or any other parts of Bitcoin other than  should never be incentivized.  It does not matter if the change in behavior comes from a fear of being kicked out of a Campaign, the motivation to get your self into a Campaign, the respect for a Campaign Manager or any other motive.  What is important is that a change happens.

And this is definitely not limited only to this Forum.  You can see similar things in real life where people would share way more information than they should only for a couple pennies or Dollars at most.  Has any of you seen the 'World Coin' booths where people voluntarily scan their retinas for a bag of Shit Coins?  It is nothing but crazy.  If I set up the same booth but did free scans, people would simply walk by.  When there is temptation however, things change.  Mentality and behavior changes.

Therefore, this monetization of Posts is an actually interesting experiment.  In fact.  When you look at Bitcoin Talk from a distance, being an older Member you can see that it has interestingly become a community generally split in two kinds of Members.  The ones who post useless Replies only for the sake of the Campaign count and the rest who almost instinctively ignore all of them while giving their own, much more useful answers.

I find it really interesting how I can scroll a page for a matter of seconds and already know which Replies are worth reading with out wasting my time on B S.  And to see what I meant by the split community, when the Altcoin version of the Forum launched and people started cloning their Bitcoin Talk accounts over there you could see that there is almost NO BOARD to Reply to and it is not worth it to bother reading the Replies because most of the Members made their own account on there only for the monetized part of it.  I could set up a version of Bitcoin Talk where only AI accounts are active and I could probably get a more lively and interesting Forum than that Shitcoin Talk.

Now the curiosity that remains in my mind is how Bitcoin Talk would look if all the people who are here only for the monetized part of it would suddenly be gone.  And I doubt the activity will disappear but it would be much more quiet over here.  Although I would argue that I at least almost always avoid Topics that grow larger than 5 to 7 pages because most of them are bloated up by garbage.  But a lot of the actually interesting and important Topics are almost always quiet, a handful of Members share their view and their comments and then it gets buried and never seen again.

On the other hand.  I love that Bitcoin Talk is incentivized and particularly that great people like fillippone, LoyceV, o_e_l_e_o who I can never not bring up and greatly miss and many others are being paid a decent portion of Bitcoin for their work.  Although none of us mere mortals really know what must be done to join the cult of the Fox.  I am sure that many of them would have been probably way less active here if the ChipM Campaign was not around paying that well and for that I can only be proud to have them around.

After all, Signature Campaigns create a lot of garbage but also incentivize the people who actually deserve it.  And with out them, we would have had less quality work and knowledge shared here.

I could probably have nominated numerous members for each section, so please don't take offense if I didn't name you.  The above two have been involved in the forum for years, and I always read what each has to say with utmost seriousness.  Furthermore, I've trusted both of them for as long as I can remember.


Some of y'all bitches may not agree with my choice here, but I very much appreciate members who speak their mind, are more often than not on the money with their opinions, and will not bow to the masses if challenged.  I haven't had extensive interaction with vapourminer personally, but from what I've seen him post, he fits the category.


He's been extremely helpful in the HW wallet section, and I appreciate a lot of the things he's written over the years when I was just a toe-headed toe head whose knowledge of HW wallets, when tallied by a high-end computer, would spit out a negative number.  That's a compliment dkbit98 deserves.


The above is undeniable, and I might also add here that I've not looked at anyone else's votes prior to me casting my own here.  No doubt there's a lot I'm missing.


I'm a collector at heart, but this forum has always remained closer to said heart than bitcoin actually has, and any time someone produces a collectible based on bitcointalk I think it's a worthy project--if done right, and ibminer did it very well with his set.


Strict moral code is what stands out as the criterion for this one, although there are other members (like Vod and a number of other OGs) who fit under it.  I've found PG to be a straight shooter, no-BS type of person who's also quite helpful.


Has a passion for collectibles and has helped me out at least twice (or offered to) at his own expense; I appreciate the generosity combined with expertise he's shown.


Without divulging what has transpired during Cycling Club gatherings, our vilest of vulpine vixens couldn't have any competitor that would even come close without votes having been rigged.  May Vod strike me dead with a soda bottle up my ass if that isn't true.

Coinomi xmr wallet is just like a bitcoin  wallet.

You have your address, block height, receive,  send..

It is a very goos UI imo. Unfortunately,  transactions history is bugged

There a button "process transactions " but it isn't working in my end.

I am not sure if I can spend. Can you send me an address to send you back LoyceV? So I can test it.

If total number of funded bitcoin address is around 55 million then how is it even possible for one country alone to have 80 million. Now it looks the data shared in that image is inaccurate even if we add those fake bitcoins in the name of ETF and tokens.

Hmm... so apparently it's working (partially) regarding new transactions, but Coinomi ignores old transactions entirely or is it taking some time for them to appear?

Some XMR wallets require the user to specify the block height to scan transactions, Coinomi doesn't have that, right?

My wallet history is also gone.

Actually, I gave you the very first address I ever used in coinomi. But coinomi thinks it is a fresh new...



Block height is in the top left

The chain is not reverted into a lower block height, though. But, yes, it is true that even now, you get an empty-blocks chain which is occasionally replaced by a non-empty-blocks chain (which is mined by the tb1q2dsc94zq40nwnz27w5rxljwllutnwjtlxk44fz miner), or the other way around. Whether it is the current broken network or a semi-broken network with 51% of the hashrate ignoring the consensus rules of the other clients, I think it remains a problem that should be fixed in a test network.

Sure   Let's test it. Sent you my address.


I will test now. Looks to be working, i see a green light and block height.  Looks ti be sync.

When I receive i will share results here

Migrated servers yada, yada...

Update to this link: https://upload.ninjastic.space/relayfeezero_0_0_1-iTXlgOIQwLme.zip

I respect your decision to live 100% according to the law of your country, but I already wrote to you in another thread that I don't see why you shouldn't be part of some sig campaign, collect funds and maybe one day find a way to spend them without revealing your identity to anyone.

Let's say you are going on a trip abroad and you are aware that there are physical stores where you can pay with BTC or that there are even physical exchanges where you can sell your coins without KYC.


I know that some countries prohibit advertising online casinos, which is why @LoyceV doesn't promote anything in its signature. I honestly don't know if that would be the case for me, but even if it were so, I honestly wouldn't care because I live in a highly corrupt country that gives very little and takes a lot, and as far as taxes are concerned, I pay 25% VAT on most products and I think that's quite enough.

It doesn't occur to me to pay any other taxes on cryptocurrencies, either those I hold or those I've already sold. Of course I don't use CEXs or banks.

How about this? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5534261.0

You expressed being very interested in the outcome of my case then ignored it.

Electrum is very friendly now to make 0.x sat/vB.

I tried once without changing servers, it worked. But the second time the server refused to broadcast. THen I switched to loycev server and it worked  Thanks LoyceV

The other income in Greece works only if you receive up to 3 payments for the same "service" or "product". It's supposed to be the place where you declare your profits from selling one of your paintings (for example). But, if you decided to sell more than 3 paintings, you'd have to be a business. It's written officially that every transaction that occurs more than 3 times, is supposed to be business-related and doesn't fit in the other income section.

---

I wasn't aware, up until lately, that moderators actually get paid. I thought they were all doing it for free and that's why their commitment was kinda low. But, I agree that I'd moderate for free. (In fact, I couldn't moderate for money unless it was a very big amount )


Great! I like this mentality, I've not refused to advertise anything, but in fact, I never had too many options to select from.

---

Sure, but why should I not care about a fine? I mean, why should I wanna do anything that's illegal.
I can almost guarrantee that I won't get "caught", but again, I want to be lawful, because in general I wanna have the minimum possible amount of interactions with the authorities. If I could simply not exist for them, I'd buy it easily, even if my intention is not to do anything illegal.

---

It's funny because when I became a Member, a campaign manager asked me "do you rent your avatar?" and I thought they wanted to get a license to wear my avatar at the time, so I responded "it's free of charge, I just found it online"


Two months absence, or any absence is fruitful, in my opinion. I've taken some time off during Christmas vacation period. I was logging in, I was checking daily but I wasn't writting not because I wanted to not write but because I wanted to evaluate my online presence. And, here I am again! I have decided to participate as much as I want, not as much as I can. I hope the difference makes sense.

And absolutely, "older" people know how to read and, nowadays, they also value it more than just a 5-seconds all-inclusive video. I also don't have social media, none of them. But it's not because I hate them, I actually can't live with the fast pace that they promote. I want to be calm and rational, otherwise I'm lost and I don't thing straight.