theymos hat heute wieder das neue Update für die Default Trust 1 Liste raus gebracht für den Monat Juni !
Hier waren dafür wieder 120 Benutzer berechtigt.

Original Beitrag von theymos : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg65441616#msg65441616

Alte Default Trust 1 Liste :

Neue Default Trust 1 Liste :

Wieder mit dabei und am Start aus dem Deutschen Bereich sind dieses mal : bullrun2024bro , 1miau , Lakai01 , Kryptowerk , Real-Duke , Buchi-88 , willi9974 , d5000 und meine wenigkeit.
Hoffentlich habe nicht wieder jemanden vergessen oder übersehen !


Hier das genaue Update und Übersicht von LoyceV:

Thank you for this, Husna and mindrust! I announced LV and d5000 about the new translations.

---

It sound like good rules. Maybe we should include them in the link where we say what translators we are looking for...?

@OP could be targeted with the same way, probably he also own alt accounts or there were few of his merited posts are questionable. Honestly this thread isn't worth for discussion, I mean like, yeah it's merit abuse, then what?

Either the sender and receiver won't get red tag just because of merit abuse, it's different if @OP bring something like a connection of two accounts and evidence if they're cheating.

Creating alts just for the sake of an attack, to keep your main account out of the way and be cool has always come with mixed feelings with me. The forum is filled with these kind of accounts and it highlights just how several accounts are created and dumped after a short purposeful theme. You’ll be sure to find them create another just when the need arises and then, they dump them yet again.

However, 5merits to an application, that doesn’t just highlight the application but, raises a lot of eyebrows as their are many same sane applications that got nothing.

This month 120 users were eligible.

Old:
New:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5545509.0

> LoyceV's topic is translated to Turkish

> Topic's stat pics updated and uploaded to github.

---

---

Yazar: LoyceV
Orjinal Konu: [May 2025]Mempool empty, Consolidate your small inputs @1.00 sat/vbyte NOW!

---

---

Moderatörlerin Dikkatine: Bu konunun teknik destek sorusu olmadığının farkındayım fakat konunun içeriği geçmişteki birçok destek talebinin ana sebebini oluşturuyor ve ilerideki destek taleplerinin azaltılmasında etkili olması oldukça muhtemeldir.  O yüzden konuyu burada açmayı uygun gördüm.

Arkaplan
Bitcoin ağı transfer yoğunluğu yaşadığında transfer ücretleri de bu yoğunluk ölçüsünde artış eğilimi gösterir. Çoğu cüzdan "dinamik ücretlendirme" ile transferleri fiyatlar ve bu da cüzdanların, transferleri daha hızlı gerçekleştirmek adına birbirleri ile yarıştığı anlamına geliyor. Bunun sonucunda ise transfer ücretleri yukarıya doğru ivmelenmektedir. Uzak olmayan bir geçmişte, hızlı bir transferi gerçekleştirme şansınızın olabilmesi için bile 600 satoshi/byte gibi bir ücreti ödemek gerekliydi.
Sonuç: Forumda "param 2 haftadır karşıya ulaşmadı, yardım"  başlıklı yardım isteyen bir sürü konu açıldı. Şu an bu konular artık yok ve tam da bu yüzden bu "karşıt" konuyu açıyorum.


Örnek
18 gün önce birisi, bu 4909 byte'lık, 33 girdili ve 510 sat/byte ile ücretlendirilmiş transferi gerçekleştirdi. Transfer ücretini ödedikten sonra, 0.033BTC olan ödemesi 0.0079539BTC'ye düştü. Eğer aynı transferi şu anki 20 sat/byte ile ücretlendirilseydi, 0.024BTC cebinde kalacaktı. Şimdi ise eline geçen miktar 0.0079539BTC, aradaki fark tam 4 katı!


Fırsat
Aşağı yukarı bir haftadır transfer ücretleri yeniden uygun hale geldi. Aylardır 1 Satoshi/byte'lık transferler bile 1 saat içinde onaylanır durumda.
Eğer ki geçmişte faucet (çok ufak miktarlarda bedava btc dağıtan web siteleri) üzerinden btc topladıysanız, adresinizde 0.000xBTC gibi ufak miktarlarda bir sürü girdi bulunması oldukça olası. Birkaç hafta önce 0.001BTC bile gerekli transfer ücretini ödemek için yeterli değilken, şimdilerde 2000 satoshi (0.00002BTC) gibi çok düşük bir ücret ödeyerek bu girdileri birleştirebilirsiniz.


Herkes için iyi bir şey
Eğer ki ağ kalabalık iken yüksek ücretli bir transfer gerçekleştirirseniz, zaten kısıtlı olan blok alanının çoğunu işgal ediyor olacaksınız. Bu da ağdaki sıkışıklığı iyice kötüleştirecektir.
Büyük ölçekli transferleri ağ trafiği düşük iken yaparsanız, ağ yeniden kalabalıklaştığında gerçekleştireceğiniz transfer ağda çok daha az yer kaplayacaktır.

Ufak girdileri birleştirme
Eğer ki çok sayıda küçük girdiniz varsa, şu an hepsini yeni bir girdi altında birleştirmek için mükemmel bir zaman! Doğrulama almak için aceleniz yoksa, çok düşük bir transfer ücreti ödemeyi seçtikten sonra sadece bekleyin. Doğrulama gerçekleştiğinde bir sonraki transferiniz çok daha ufak bir işlem olarak gerçekleşecektir ve bu da transfer ücreti olarak çok daha azını ödeyeceğiniz anlamına geliyor. Eğer yeterli sayıda küçük girdiniz var ise, transfer ücretinden yüzde 95'e kadar tasarruf etmeniz mümkün!


Nasıl
Şimdi işin ince noktasına gelelim: Bahsettiğim şeylerin gerçekleşmesi tamamen kullandığınız cüzdan yazılımına bağlı! İzlenecek en kolay yol tüm bakiyenizi cüzdanınızdaki yeni bir adrese göndermek olurdu. Transfer ücretini kendinizin seçtiğinden emin olun!
Ben genellikle Bitcoin Core üzerindeki "coin kontrolünü etkinleştir" seçeneğini tercih ediyorum. Bunu Electrum ile de yapmanız mümkün. Çok çok ufak olanlar hariç (örnek 0.00001BTC, bunları seçerseniz gönderime harcayacağınız ücret girdinin kendisinden fazla olacaktır.) hangi girdileri kullanacağınızı seçin ve tüm girdileri seçeceğiniz kendinize ait yeni adrese gönderin.
Eğer çok sayıda farklı girdiniz var ise, hepsini tek seferde birleştirmek yerine aşama aşama ilerleminizi tavsiye ederim. 100,000 byte'lık ve 500 girdili bir işlem yapmak yerine, ~20'şer girdili birkaç işlem oluşturun.


Eğer kullanmakta olduğunuz cüzdan yazılımı transfer ücreti tanımlamanıza ve/veya coin kontrol kullanımına izin vermiyor ise; özel anahtarlarınızı dışa aktardıktan sonra bu özellikleri sunan başka bir cüzdan yazılımında içe aktarmak suretiyle işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirebilirsiniz. Bu konuya ait ayrıntılar ise malesef başka bir başlık altında tartışılmalıdır.

Gizlilik
Girdilerinizi birleştirmek demek, onları blok zinciri üzerinde birbirine bağlamak demektir. Bu girdilere ait bakiyeleri başka herhangi bir transfer işleminde kullanmak, bu başlık altında anlatılan işlemden farklı bir işlem değildir ama yine de işleme başlamadan önce ne ile karşı karşıya olduğunuzu dikkate almanızda fayda var.

SegWit
Wind_FURY'in açtığı Transfer ücretlerini düşürme teknikleri isimli başlıkta, SegWit adreslerinin kullanımı da dahil olmak üzere bu konu hakkında kapsamlı bir genel bakış mevcuttur.

Transfer ücreti tahmincileri

• https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,1w (pooya87'ye teşekkürler)
• https://coinb.in/#fees Bu site, girdileri ve çıktıları el ile seçmenize ve gerçekleştireceğiniz işlemin byte cinsinden boyutunu önceden görebilmenizi sağlıyor.
• https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx
• https://estimatefee.com (İşleminizin hangi süre zarfında, kaç blok sonra onaylanmasını istiyorsanız ona göre işlem ücreti tavsiyesi veriyor. (Güncelleme Nisan 6, 2019: Bu sitenin önerdiği işlem ücretleri Bitcoin Core'un önerdiğinin 3 kat fazlası.) -- teşekkürler lite)

Spam'e Hayır
Başlığın altı imza çöplüğüne dönmesin diye açtığım tüm konuların moderasyonunu kendim yapıyorum. Alakasız mesajları sileceğim. Eğer ki oldu da ilk mesajın tamamını alıntılarsanız mesajınız silinecektir.
Arasıra atılan mesajların genel bir özetini geçip başlığın altını temizleyeceğim.

Feragatname
Bu bilgilerden faydalanırken fayda/zarar hesabınızı kendiniz yapın. Her işlemden önce ne yaptığınızı mutlaka bir düşünün. Özellikle özel anahtarlarınız ile ilgili bir işlem yapıyorsanız çok dikkatli olun. Kararsız kaldığınız bir an olursa o işlemi yapmaktan vazgeçin.
Ben de bir insanım ve zaman zaman hatalar yapıyorum. Eğer hatalı olduğum bir nokta var ise beni bilgilendirebilirsiniz.

---

You did just reply to a post from 11 years ago. So.....


What happens when you try to send?
Null is the proper response.

https://bitcoincore.org/en/doc/0.20.0/rpc/wallet/walletpassphrase/

-Dave

I agree that most people who understand Bitcoin keep their coins off exchanges and view it more as a form of savings than something to use for everyday spending.A lot of transactions are now moving to the Lightning Network and other L2 solutions, so we don’t see them directly on the blockchain. That doesn’t mean people aren’t using Bitcoin it’s just that the technology has advanced a bit, and some things are happening more "behind the scenes."As for the idea of a Bitcoin standard if it ever actually happens i believe many people will start by saving in BTC, but over time, the moment will come when it starts getting used for payments too, especially for bigger purchases.

I also ran the pywallet --recover directly with drive instead of the disk image input, and after it ran, it outputs:


This output seems to indicate that it does find something, but for some reason crashes at the very end.

The json files that it outputs are 30+ KB in size, they contain things like mkey: [xxxx,zzzz], and ckey: [xxxx,zzzz] etc.

To me, the mkey sounds like it is a reference to the wallet's master key and ckey sounds like the encrypted private keys.

People who save in bitcoin, and who understand what it is, do not store them in exchanges.  The reason there's less on-chain volume is due to the inevitable nature of bitcoin; it solves a much bigger problem as a store of value than as medium of exchange.  Protecting yourself against central bank inflation is a much bigger problem to the world than transacting peer-to-peer. I would bet that the more we move towards a bitcoin standard, the more people will save in it and the volume will increase more or less linearly. 

I'd be satisfied seeing people competing on who would fill it first.  I guess it is bitcoin's fate to have a variable mempool.

I ran it with the --recov_device pointing to the path that contains the dd created disk image file. It ran and created a "pywallet_partial_recovery_xxxx.json" file. It didn't create a new wallet.dat file, as it said it would.

Any tips what should I do now?

I'm just glad he didn't try to read too much into my username, which at this point can only be considered yet another joke nobody will get anymore. It definitely isn't an indicator of my age, which I'm sure OP will be relieved to learn is well above the age of consent to produce pornography in my jurisdiction.

I wonder how OP will react to term "slave/master" and "whitelist/blacklist" without knowing the context.

P.S. The context is digital computing.


All of us know it's inverse of child support .

A slight correction, changing the password of an already-encrypted wallet wont set a new keypool.
Or was it different in the first implementation of wallet encryption in version 0.4.0?

You can also try to paste a copy of that corrupted wallet.dat to a small partition that you'll set as --recov-device and see if pywalet --recover can find private keys in it.

At least there was no instant error message when trying to do that, so I now have pywallet with the recover option running, with --recov_device pointing to the image file from the dedicated Linux laptop that hopefully contains some private keys. The image file is about 1 TB in size, so this will take a moment to run. I will report back when it has completed.

Thank you very much for your help so far.

Indeed, this is as much as I learned after I started to figure out what could be the reason why my balance was showing almost zero. And I have not made many transactions with the wallet to begin with. But nevertheless, Bitcoin-cli shows almost zero balance. I tried to do "bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet=legacy rescanblockchain 0" as well, to see if that would somehow fix the situation, but it didn't help.

Running bitcoind on the original wallet.dat says:



I have not tried that. Does the pywallet's --recov_device parameter accept a path to the disk image, or do I do something with the disk image first, such as mount it?

I know wetin I dey tok. Dip Pidgin dey veri difiren 4rm simple english. And wetin mk sum of us di try mk am get small touch of simple english inside na BCOS pipol de here wen no go fit de read am for di dip pidgin registers. Port Harcourt pidgin dey, Edo/Delta kind of pidgin dey, if we start to di write am exactly Di way we di speak am even sum of una no go undastand am. And dis whyte guys no no sef.

And about di one u say if no bodi dey here wey no di undastand english. To me dat question jxt be lik say der no nid 4 d Naija local board since it's assume say we all dey fit translate english for here. But my own question be say, is english our original language? No. Na mk we di use pidgin as the central one coin by us wich dey dey difiren from di actual simple english.

You made me curious, turns out there is also a [html] tag (no cute coloring though?).


<input type="text" name="subject" value="Re: Hidden pages/ features on the forum" tabindex="1" size="80" maxlength="80">


And here is a actually good one:

[nobbc]xxx[/nobbc]

So you can write the bbcode tag as it is:

bold here
[b]no bold here[/b]

Actually, you've got it backwards. Nearly everyone wearing that avatar is being paid to do so, and only a few have ever worn simply to promote whatever it represents. Even though all it represents is a practical joke that got way out of hand. It's just a friendly jab at those who accuse high-ranking forum members of merit cycling, that's all.

Of course it's true. All that porno with my name on it didn't graph itself, after all.

While altersex furry pornography isn't outright promoted by my avatar (except on a few special occasions), everyone in the club understands that I have a reputation to maintain and is supportive of my work.

Be honest, did you ever notice a fox that didn't?

Don't forget The Sceptical Chymist.

A few months ago I was engaged in a debate with one individual who wore this avatar:



Then I started noticing others wearing it, but didn't really think anything of it; it must be some club I'm not invited to join.  Then I stumbled onto two old-timers hurling insults at each other in the Reputation section, which lead me to this topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.0  I noticed that several high ranking members are wearing that avatar.

I believe that at least one high ranking individual is being paid to wear that avatar, but apparently others are wearing it to promote whatever this represents.  Based on the discussion between Foxpup and BayAreaCoins I concluded that Foxpup is a pornographer.  Is this true?  Is that what's being promoted by the avatar?  After learning this I did notice that the fox in the graphic does look sexualized,  I'm asking out of curiosity, and I'm anxious to hear from the people wearing the avatar.  What is it you're promoting?

Foxpup
LoyceV
suchmoon
GazetaBitcoin
apogio
fillippone

Do not post what you did not know about. I tried to find the thread or post but I was not able to see it. Probably it has been deleted. I think it was about a translated post that someone translated LoyceV post so that he can receive merits as usual but LoyceV posted that Pidgin is very similar to English that he does not think it is worth the translation. LoyceV never rated Pidgin language and has not involved himself in anything we are discussing related to Pidgin.

Is there anyone reading the translation contents that did not understand English? That was the reason I suggested it in the past that they should not have a single thread for it as having a new topic for each might let more people see it and visit the original thread. Although, it is now pinned.

Wait oh, so LoyceV don turn who done the approve proper Naija pidgin or what? Omoor no vex oh, but this talk sound to me  like someone way the talk with low self esteem. When last any of our local board snr men like Cryptopreneur Brainboss, Igebotz or Charles-Tim don go other countries local board come the rate their local language as being proper or not?

We be Nigerians and we no need anyone outside our local to be the one to rate our pidgin. It's just like the fallacy we were taught in primary school say nah Mungo Park discover River Niger and Benue, as if people been no the love there before him arrive the place.

My bad, thanks Loyce, 2026*.

Evo jedne situacije sto je @LoyceV postavio danas

Realno situacija idealna za one koji hoce da prebace vece iznose bez nekih visokih naknada. Zanimljivo mi je sto su blokovi satima izlazili poluprazni,sto ukazuje na pad aktivnosti. Trebalo bi iskoristiti ovaj miran period jer generalno ne traje dugo

I just  asked them in their reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/COINOMI/s/YFzsy6Eyw9

Let's see of they respond

Yeah  that would be good lol but impossible to do..

They have many relationships with China and Russia,  and they would always be sharing data. .

I can second that statement about Racknerd, running a kvm vps there since ~3yrs and no single problem so far.
But I concede that I am a few inches days short in the uptime-dick-swinging-contest (damn them friggin kernel update reboots..): 

Though unfortunately Racknerd accepts some crypto but not Monero:

$15 (fifteen dollars) in BTC))

Latest Bitcoin Block 899,205

Soon we will see result)

It's only enough to know if they support Monero payments or not. If so, then no transaction screening on any coins since XMR is untraceable anyway.

Looks like I'm going to be scouring LowEndTalk for a while.

Some specs I'm looking for to make searching easier:

- 512GB SSD
- At least 16GB of memory - more is obviously good, I want indexing to be instantaneous this time, instead of taking months.
- A regular Intel/AMD processor will do (Apparently, I don't need a GPU. w00t!)
- 1 Gbps Ethernet

I'm fine with spending $100/month on this, but deals are obviously nice.

My brother am talking about the bold words in your write up, the opinion of loycev no matter for our community, and no body send am if him see am in a good way or not, am a proud African and a Nigerian, his opinion about our pikin no matter as I don talk already because everyone can not see things the same way.

Then going back to the topic of discussion, truly to write and relate with pikin dy more relaxing than using English, even though say to write with English dy more easier, the major problem is that most people pigin no dy readable, you fit  bite ur tongue in the process of reading their write up, if not, na him for make sense pass, but anyhow sha, I still fancy the both of them because no be everybody Sabi relate well in using both of them, so in my own opinion, make things stay as e dy now.

It's great that you took initiative not too long after it's addressed and it helped many of such unmerited ones still it doesn't makes it fair which is my point.

I am not a fan of judging which of my posts deserves to be merited because I feel each one of them does.

What I was talking is some replies those are very generic and mostly in broken english manages to get more just because they're at the right local board as well as got generous active merit sources which creates bias in the system.

Now, just a few days to go before year’s end we need to remember a year of centralized mixer fails. First, ChipMixer’s downfall, later Whirlwind’s downfall and now Sinbad.io’s downfall are truly lessons to be learned from.
We need to draw conclusions and it is important for us to learn from it to avoid repeating similar mistakes.

While all cases are different, a basic problem is boiling down to being centralized services. We have learned from Bitcoin why decentralization is important. Centralized mixers is exactly what a decentralization maximalist needs to be critical of.


Disadvantages of centralized services

We know it very well from Bitcoin: decentralization is king. Bitcoin is so famous because it’s decentralized. By decentralizing it, important attack vectors against it won’t work.

In opposite, mixers like Whirlwind, Sinbad.io or ChipMixer are centralized. It is run by an operator / CEO and he can do mistakes, get caught and steal funds. We have to trust him and how he is running his service.
Whirlwind outright scammed everyone, where developers just decided to abandon Whirlwind and as a logical result from centralized services, customers received financial loss. Maybe all data will be sold on Darket marketplaces to increase owner profits.
It is all about avoiding a middleman, trustless.
Bitcoin is legit, Bitcoin has no CEO.

Decentralized is king!


ChipMixer’s case


Let's have a closer look at ChipMixer:

Are ChipMixer operators really well educated and honest?

In a centralized service, we depend on its operators to be honest and well educated. We don’t know it if ChipMixer’s developers are honest and well educated but what we heard from some research, ChipMixer’s founder was not someone who was extremely educated, as flaws in his operations were revealed. Yes, he was able to set up a website and code mixing operations, also in DarkNet but after all, he can also have hired a coder to set it up and maintain it. We don’t now much about ChipMixer’s development team size and experience. It is unknown.
Once again, we need to trust some internet strangers.


Centralized services need an income – not unlike Bitcoin

As every centralized service, also ChipMixer needed an income. ChipMixer didn’t charge any fees for mixing, only dust, which didn’t fit in Chips was charged, which is not much after all. ChipMixer also had a gambling part, where customers can bet a Bitcoin amount and double it – or lose it. 47% chance of success. A part of it was ChipMixer’s revenue.
To generate revenue for it’s operations, every centralized service needs an income and most likely ChipMixer’s income was to launder criminal funds and even being involved in DarkNet operations.
It’s not a surprise. Sinbad.io is even worse involved in criminal syndicate businesss, it is shocking, but later more about it.
Conclusion: Such money needs to have an origin and it’s likely to be from criminal origin (hacked funds, stolen funds, extorted funds), where ChipMixer participated in deals to obtain income from.


ChipMixer’s involvement in DarkNet markets

After ChipMixer was operating for a long time, it suffered to be a target for criminals to launder stolen or hacked Bitcoins. It is quite likely, more and more hackers and criminals found out about ChipMixer over time.
In addition, ChipMixer seemed to be operating a DarkNet activities itself but it is still not known to which degree ChipMixer has been involved in DarkNet markets.
After ChipMixer never provided any statement, not from employees as well, it seems to be a very centralized service and a very small team. We don’t know how many employees ChipMixer had. Most likely ChipMixer was run by few people close to DarkNet markets and didn’t apply valid security measures, like deleting old private keys from customers because data was found later and keys emptied.


Sinbad.io’s case

Let's have a closer look at Sinbad.io:

While most points are already covered and apply for Sinbad.io like it does for ChipMixer, Sinbad.io is one step more shocking and more tied to crime. Because from all information available, seachable for anyone to do a quick internet research, Sinbad.io was already tied to massive criminals when it started.
Sinbad.io started as a re-branded, already busted mixer, blender.io, known for funneling funds from big hacks and criminal syndicates before it got busted:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sanctioned-mixer-blender-launched-sinbad-183621428.html
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/02/13/sanctioned-mixer-blender-re-launched-as-sinbad-elliptic-says/
https://decrypt.co/208160/sanctioned-bitcoin-mixer-blender-relaunch-sinbad-sanctioned-again
https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/14/blender_crypto_mixer_sinbad/
https://decrypt.co/121222/new-sinbad-bitcoin-mixer-is-sanctioned-blender
https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-mixer-blender-has-been-rebranded-to-sinbad-says-elliptic
https://www.theblock.co/post/211225/sinbad-crypto-mixing-service-may-be-blender-in-disguise-elliptic
https://dailycoin.com/elliptic-reports-that-blender-rebranded-as-sinbad/

While people here now complain about Royse777 remaining funds are difficult to process, many funds going into blender.io previously, going into Sinbad.io after blender.io got busted, are 100% identical. It’s also stolen and hacked funds.
Sinbad.io funds were not just from DarkNet markets like ChipMixer, funds were even from organized crime syndicates.

Sinbad.io abused Bitcointalk to attract clean coins, to get volumes for mixing Sinbad.io’s extremely tainted coins. Bitcointalk members were abused like exit liquidity from shitcoin pump and dumps.
It’s a real shame, what Sinbad.io pulled of.
We need to spot such scum next time.



Final conclusions

While mixers like ChipMixer or Sinbad.io have been very famous, it’s now clear how ChipMixer clearly missed solid standards in terms of operation, transparency and security, how Sinbad was already guilty when it started and what Sinbad.io pulled off against Bitcointalk.
While ChipMixer was tied to DarkNet marketc, Sinbad.io funds were even from big organized crime syndicates.
We don’t know yet, which fallouts are still upcoming because for ChipMixer, 7 TB of data are a lot. For Sinbad.io a similar outcome of sized data might be up and people need to be aware how tainted coins from Sinbad.io really are. It’s coins from criminal syndicates.  
Possibly, many transactions can get unmixed, which is good to catch scammers, criminals and syndicates but everyone who used such a mixer legitimately, can possibly get identified as well.
In Whirlwind, many people lost funds but just because of luck, an escrow still held money for refunds. In future cases, such refunds might not be available.
In ChipMixer, many people lost funds because private keys, which serves as "chips" were not deleted by ChipMixer.
According to LoyceV’s research many chip-sized funded addresses were emptied, indicating funds from Chips were moved at once in a sudden action. We can draw a conclusion from it: ChipMixer didn’t delete private keys after a session expired. According to ChipMixer, deleted sessions can’t be restored, where we can expect also deleting keys to prevent any malicious actor from obtaining it.
Because imagine it is also possible for a hacker to obtain such private keys.

Because of being a centralized service, ChipMixer's, Whirlwind's and Sinbad.io's downfall was no surprise.

Hello LoyceV,

Thank you for your generosity)) and for sharing the topic link. I have received and thoroughly checked the information you provided. I will make sure to warn our campaign users about this.

Thanks again for your help!

yes ok I understood what LoyceV said
but I still don't understand the rotation proposal, it seems to me with too much effort
maybe I'm a little limited in my imagination, this could be it, I don't rule it out at all
In my opinion it would be an effort that is not rewarded

That's fine. I already managed to lose access to my telegram account. Guess I'll hodl lol. Wasn't planning on redeeming the prize anyway 

I'd expect it can be done with node.js, but it's only some things I've heard and some dots I've connected, I also don't actually know how.
Nowadays I would not be surprised if an AI can do this for you, but it still requires time.


Indeed!

Good luck and make sure you check some of the obtained seeds with the official wallet to avoid surprises.

From your perspective it will be a good thing to do but Loycev explained it better, the merits are not scarce so no point in reducing one to increase another unless the admin want to keep the merit distribution to a certain number for some reason. But 45? That's too low, theymos should review them once in a while and whoever exhausts their merits should get a 10% increase after a cycle, which can be 3 months or 6 months, and it can keep on going.

As I said, being active doesn't necessarily mean posting more, it is about how much time they spend on reading others' post and able to make a judgment whether it will be helpful for others too and encourage such posts with merits. Posting frequency is their preference and no one should force change their posting habit just because they are in signature campaign.

I just tried that and it worked.

To OP:
If you mistakenly sent bitcoin to legacy address generated by your bitpay wallet, here is how you can recover your fund.

• Install electrum from its official website.
• Select "Standard wallet" and then "I already have a seed".
• If you are on dekstop, click on "options" and check "BIP39 seed" and if you are on mobile, select "BIP39" from the drop-down menu.
  
• Enter your seed phrase and proceed to the next level.
• Select "legacy (p2pkh)" as the type of your addresses and change the derivation path to m/44'/145'/0'

I have made a similar argument in the past and honestly the fact is they have their upsides and down sides. I understand where your point is actually headed and the thing is both languages are feasible but have their needs sometimes. Although the Nigerian pidgin doesn't really have strict writing rules like English, it can still be understandable a majority of the time. The problem is most Nigerians make low quality pidgin post especially when translating.

When most translate they are so much in a rush that they fail to make sure every grammar in that translation is broken down to basic understandable pidgin it's the reason you see people of the likes of LoyceV don't see pidgin as a proper language.

Noted on the remaining, will be processed by this upcoming weekend.

No worries, Porf, we are all humans (although there are high doubts regarding LV being AI  ; but apart from him, we are all humans for sure)

Well, let me add a small heads-up regarding the 2 remaining topics in progress:

• [May 2025]Fees are low, think about Consolidating your small inputs @1.00 sat/vb by LoyceV: [POR] [RUS] [GER] [POL] [SPA] [UKR] [PID] [ROM]

This thread has 8 translations, thus only 2 more are needed. The available languages are: [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [TUR] [UKR] [FIL] [BAN] [URD] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus, mindrust / mela65, DrBeer, Peanutswar, DS, Adiljutt156 and M47AK16.

• Fees are low? Make your coins more private and (almost) quantum safe! by d5000: [POR] [UKR] [GER] [ROM] [PID] [URD] [POL]

This thread has 7 translations, thus 3 more are needed. The available languages are: [RUS] [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [SPA] [TUR] [FIL] [PID] [BAN] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of zasad@ / DrBeer, paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus, Porf, mindrust / mela65, Peanutswar, DS, Adiljutt156 and M47AK16.

---

Okay!

I just installed Bitpay wallet on my mobile to see how it works.

Bitpay generates a segwit wallet for bitcoin and it displayes each bitcoin cash address in two formats. Legacy format which starts with 1 and CashAddr format which starts with q.
So, it's possible that OP made a bitcoin transaction to the address generated by Bitpay for bitcoin cash in legacy format.

Bitpay gives a BIP39 seed phrase for the wallet and it should be possible to recover the fund, but I couldn't generate the same addresses in electrum. Maybe, Bitpay uses a non-standard derivation path.

sarcasm
I hope I guessed right this time 

Ohhhh, I just noticed that. That is so cooool! Bravooo


(Now I hope we will not hear each other again (in this topic, that is) at end of 2026 )

It is amusing me to see that In fact I was wondering if this may become the longest unfinished raffle ever. Maybe it will last until 2030...? (Smileeeeee!)


I believe the same... I agree with you here. At least we are sure that its hardware integrity is intact...

(Side note: I was living with the impression you are not frequenting Collectibles board...? )

After some months of reading thread on this board, you'll get vague feeling whether someone looking for help probably have been scammed. Anyway, it's not first time that Bitcoin address mentioned by someone who probably got scammed. For example,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5274302.0
https://ninjastic.space/topic/5431054

i am an exchanger my friend i just want to earn some profit all i want is some trades so that i can earn some profit

I wouldn't trust a thing from that shitcoin site.

How do you see the Trust score, it depends on your Trust list and settings. Check this thread from LoyceV, it's very explanatory.


This user is over from back then. No matter who gets the ownership of this account, this feedback will never change. Especially Lauda's...

However, you have only USDT available...
And if/ when you buy the BTC, you will sell them here for +7%.
What an idea...


Probably, he isn't satisfied with the current number of buyers that he has.

It's still a work in progress

If you would like, I can emulate the altcoin experience by adding a function which slashes your funds in half every time Bitcoin goes down by 2%

Well, bitcoin was worth a few cents, then it reached a single-digit dollar value, then two, and so on. Currently, it's at six-digit figures, so it makes sense, right?

I bet OP already lost some money, which is why he is asking for the location with the hope he can get back his money. Good Luck, buddy!

Yeah, right. But does the daily volume on CMC usually means only spot trading on all exchanges? and sometimes it might include futures or other stuff too. Like perpetual futures making up to 60% + of all crypto trading volume. Still, 510,000 BTC moving daily is a lot compared to what’s left on exchanges, but a big/huge buy like 22,000 BTC still isn’t something you can just buy without the market noticing…

I thought it was you. I might be mistaken but you somewhere wrote about it that when you registered your intention was something else then later your interest grew for Bitcoin and the technology.

There was a user I can not remember his name. He was banned for spamming but later he earned a good name. I am not regular so I can't remember the name clearly. In fact, I don't know if I will recognize the user if I see him in a discussion.

How did you find out what the question was?
Anyway, it's very fun that you even had to say that nobody will give OP a wallet with 3 billion dollars. I thought they would, but now that you clarified it, I will be more hesitant.

yes ok but I'm really not against the day towards these workers who do the oldest job in the world
I don't care even if it was done
I really don't know about this nonsense about the day of the sandwich with ham or the day of the child with almond eyes or other nonsense like that

I said I am like sheldon cooper, I dont understand sarcasm, lol bazinga

It was brainboss LoyceV!
I have seen you mentioned that somewhere else and I remember that pretty well. You were talking about Brainboss who is a campaign manager right now. This is not his username, but his service name is Brain boss Management. His username is kinda hard, I am not surprised that you couldn’t remember his username.

@babo, sarcasm lose the power if that needed explanation.

ah now I get it, I consider these things of the days of things a nuance of woke culture, which I hate because it's stupid
we are at the twilight of intelligence with woke culture, do not support these brainless men

IIRC, it was in a Reddit comment from their representative replying to a user who claimed they got banned recently. I think the user stated that they did use a lot of data in a month, but never explicitly stated the number of it, then the Windscribe representative claimed it was 60 PB/month. Other reports claimed the users only use 10 TB or less,s so I'm not sure the exact limit for their "unlimited" plan. I guess I'll look for other services if they keep being hush hush about it.

I don't think flags generally carry date or timestamps. Probably some other extensions by LoyceV could have data on that but based on the forum's interface alone I don't think flags come with dates. Normal trust tags come with dates even if you don't add a reference link. LoyceV also has a data collection on that and it's pretty much why I guessed he should probably have one on this too.
However generally the flags are usually created shortly after what happens on a thread so it's usually within same date window.

Excellent work. Thank you very much.

By the way, I take this opportunity to ask. Are you able to easily make backups of TalkImg images?
The model I implemented is working well?

I don't think he is necessarily talking about today. As currently the mempool is empty for some time, previously it was full for many months all the time. I remember all the fuss about ordinals, and then runes and so on during the last year. I'm not sure whether it will come back as the wider market of these things suffered massive losses after this period of activity and spam.

Anyway the point stands that there is no reason to do everything on chain.

If only all major services always paid attention to this. 

The fee rate recommendation is below text "Transaction Fees". As for which recommendation, you can hover your cursor (on desktop) or touch (on mobile) the priority text to see their defnition of high, medium, low and no priority.


As stated by @LoyceV, it should be depends on OP needs since mempool.space shows fee rate recommendation.


Some wallet also have preview feature where you can see transaction size before the TX is signed/broadcasted.

What spam?
Bitcoin mempool is empty for months and number of transactions is slowly but surely decreasing.
People who want to crate spam moved on new altcoin blockchains, so I think even ethereum fees are now much lower.

First, the local community has to unite and apply for a local board, right? I know there was an application, but it is too old. As far as I understand, the admins know the real size of the community. It may look like we have 30+ active posters, but I think admins know how many of them operate alternative accounts. I think he would smile and stay silent when he sees the application again.

Why would I remove that? Isn't that obvious why they are posting these things? You should blame the abuser instead of someone else.

Look like he is getting a lot of positive energy from his brother
Cryptoddler




Copleaks: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%



Copleaks: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%



Copleaks: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%

Also, this scam could be post here  Crypto Scam Tracker along with the whole story

OP created the scam accustion thread, link is at the bottom of his post.

Anwyay, flag supported. And yeah, it's unbelievable how reckless people are with their money.